Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Prime.Lemmas
/-!
# Theory of degrees of polynomials
Some of the main results include
- `natDegree_comp_le` : The degree of the composition is at most the product of degrees
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finsupp Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {ι : Type w} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section Degree
theorem natDegree_comp_le : natDegree (p.comp q) ≤ natDegree p * natDegree q :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : p.comp q = 0 then by rw [h0, natDegree_zero]; exact Nat.zero_le _
else
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
↑(natDegree (p.comp q)) = degree (p.comp q) := (degree_eq_natDegree h0).symm
_ = _ := congr_arg degree comp_eq_sum_left
_ ≤ _ := degree_sum_le _ _
_ ≤ _ :=
Finset.sup_le fun n hn =>
calc
degree (C (coeff p n) * q ^ n) ≤ degree (C (coeff p n)) + degree (q ^ n) :=
degree_mul_le _ _
_ ≤ natDegree (C (coeff p n)) + n • degree q :=
(add_le_add degree_le_natDegree (degree_pow_le _ _))
_ ≤ natDegree (C (coeff p n)) + n • ↑(natDegree q) :=
(add_le_add_left (nsmul_le_nsmul_right (@degree_le_natDegree _ _ q) n) _)
_ = (n * natDegree q : ℕ) := by
rw [natDegree_C, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, nsmul_eq_mul]
simp
_ ≤ (natDegree p * natDegree q : ℕ) :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <|
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (mem_support_iff.1 hn))
(Nat.zero_le _)
theorem natDegree_comp_eq_of_mul_ne_zero (h : p.leadingCoeff * q.leadingCoeff ^ p.natDegree ≠ 0) :
natDegree (p.comp q) = natDegree p * natDegree q := by
by_cases hq : natDegree q = 0
· exact le_antisymm natDegree_comp_le (by simp [hq])
apply natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero natDegree_comp_le
rwa [coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree hq]
theorem degree_pos_of_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (h : IsRoot p a) : 0 < degree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hlt => by
have := eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hlt
rw [IsRoot, this, eval_C] at h
simp only [h, RingHom.map_zero] at this
exact hp this
theorem natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero : p.natDegree ≤ n ↔ ∀ N : ℕ, n < N → p.coeff N = 0 := by
simp_rw [natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, Nat.cast_lt]
theorem natDegree_add_le_iff_left {n : ℕ} (p q : R[X]) (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p + q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ p.natDegree ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le h qn⟩
refine natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mpr fun m hm => ?_
convert natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mp h m hm using 1
rw [coeff_add, natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mp qn _ hm, add_zero]
theorem natDegree_add_le_iff_right {n : ℕ} (p q : R[X]) (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p + q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ q.natDegree ≤ n := by
rw [add_comm]
exact natDegree_add_le_iff_left _ _ pn
-- TODO: Do we really want the following two lemmas? They are straightforward consequences of a
-- more atomic lemma
theorem natDegree_C_mul_le (a : R) (f : R[X]) : (C a * f).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
simpa using natDegree_mul_le (p := C a)
theorem natDegree_mul_C_le (f : R[X]) (a : R) : (f * C a).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
simpa using natDegree_mul_le (q := C a)
|
theorem eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) (ns : n ∈ p.support) :
p.natDegree = n :=
le_antisymm pn (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ ns)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Lemmas.lean | 98 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Submonoid.Center
/-!
# Centers of subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Multiset
variable {G : Type*} [Group G]
namespace Subgroup
variable (G)
/-- The center of a group `G` is the set of elements that commute with everything in `G` -/
@[to_additive
"The center of an additive group `G` is the set of elements that commute with
everything in `G`"]
def center : Subgroup G :=
{ Submonoid.center G with
carrier := Set.center G
inv_mem' := Set.inv_mem_center }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_center : ↑(center G) = Set.center G :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem center_toSubmonoid : (center G).toSubmonoid = Submonoid.center G :=
rfl
instance center.isMulCommutative : IsMulCommutative (center G) :=
⟨⟨fun a b => Subtype.ext (b.2.comm a).symm⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")] alias center.isCommutative := Subgroup.center.isMulCommutative
variable {G} in
/-- The center of isomorphic groups are isomorphic. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!) "The center of isomorphic additive groups are isomorphic."]
def centerCongr {H} [Group H] (e : G ≃* H) : center G ≃* center H := Submonoid.centerCongr e
/-- The center of a group is isomorphic to the center of its opposite. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!)
"The center of an additive group is isomorphic to the center of its opposite."]
def centerToMulOpposite : center G ≃* center Gᵐᵒᵖ := Submonoid.centerToMulOpposite
variable {G}
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_center_iff {z : G} : z ∈ center G ↔ ∀ g, g * z = z * g := by
rw [← Semigroup.mem_center_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
instance decidableMemCenter (z : G) [Decidable (∀ g, g * z = z * g)] : Decidable (z ∈ center G) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ mem_center_iff
@[to_additive]
instance centerCharacteristic : (center G).Characteristic := by
refine characteristic_iff_comap_le.mpr fun ϕ g hg => ?_
rw [mem_center_iff]
intro h
rw [← ϕ.injective.eq_iff, map_mul, map_mul]
exact (hg.comm (ϕ h)).symm
theorem _root_.CommGroup.center_eq_top {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] : center G = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff']
intro x
rw [Subgroup.mem_center_iff]
intro y
exact mul_comm y x
/-- A group is commutative if the center is the whole group -/
def _root_.Group.commGroupOfCenterEqTop (h : center G = ⊤) : CommGroup G :=
{ ‹Group G› with
mul_comm := by
rw [eq_top_iff'] at h
intro x y
apply Subgroup.mem_center_iff.mp _ x
exact h y
}
variable {H : Subgroup G}
section Normalizer
@[to_additive]
| theorem center_le_normalizer : center G ≤ H.normalizer := fun x hx y => by
simp [← mem_center_iff.mp hx y, mul_assoc]
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Center.lean | 94 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
/-!
# Order intervals
This file defines (nonempty) closed intervals in an order (see `Set.Icc`). This is a prototype for
interval arithmetic.
## Main declarations
* `NonemptyInterval`: Nonempty intervals. Pairs where the second element is greater than the first.
* `Interval`: Intervals. Either `∅` or a nonempty interval.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
/-- The nonempty closed intervals in an order.
We define intervals by the pair of endpoints `fst`, `snd`. To convert intervals to the set of
elements between these endpoints, use the coercion `NonemptyInterval α → Set α`. -/
@[ext (flat := false)]
structure NonemptyInterval (α : Type*) [LE α] extends Prod α α where
/-- The starting point of an interval is smaller than the endpoint. -/
fst_le_snd : fst ≤ snd
namespace NonemptyInterval
section LE
variable [LE α] {s t : NonemptyInterval α}
theorem toProd_injective : Injective (toProd : NonemptyInterval α → α × α) :=
fun s t h => by cases s; cases t; congr
/-- The injection that induces the order on intervals. -/
def toDualProd : NonemptyInterval α → αᵒᵈ × α :=
toProd
@[simp]
theorem toDualProd_apply (s : NonemptyInterval α) : s.toDualProd = (toDual s.fst, s.snd) :=
rfl
theorem toDualProd_injective : Injective (toDualProd : NonemptyInterval α → αᵒᵈ × α) :=
toProd_injective
instance [IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (NonemptyInterval α) :=
⟨fun s => isEmptyElim s.fst⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton (NonemptyInterval α) :=
toDualProd_injective.subsingleton
instance le : LE (NonemptyInterval α) :=
⟨fun s t => t.fst ≤ s.fst ∧ s.snd ≤ t.snd⟩
theorem le_def : s ≤ t ↔ t.fst ≤ s.fst ∧ s.snd ≤ t.snd :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `toDualProd` as an order embedding. -/
@[simps]
def toDualProdHom : NonemptyInterval α ↪o αᵒᵈ × α where
toFun := toDualProd
inj' := toDualProd_injective
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- Turn an interval into an interval in the dual order. -/
def dual : NonemptyInterval α ≃ NonemptyInterval αᵒᵈ where
toFun s := ⟨s.toProd.swap, s.fst_le_snd⟩
invFun s := ⟨s.toProd.swap, s.fst_le_snd⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_dual (s : NonemptyInterval α) : s.dual.fst = toDual s.snd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_dual (s : NonemptyInterval α) : s.dual.snd = toDual s.fst :=
rfl
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] {s : NonemptyInterval α} {x : α × α} {a : α}
instance : Preorder (NonemptyInterval α) :=
Preorder.lift toDualProd
instance : Coe (NonemptyInterval α) (Set α) :=
⟨fun s => Icc s.fst s.snd⟩
instance (priority := 100) : Membership α (NonemptyInterval α) :=
⟨fun s a => a ∈ (s : Set α)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {hx : x.1 ≤ x.2} : a ∈ mk x hx ↔ x.1 ≤ a ∧ a ≤ x.2 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_def : a ∈ s ↔ s.fst ≤ a ∧ a ≤ s.snd :=
Iff.rfl
theorem coe_nonempty (s : NonemptyInterval α) : (s : Set α).Nonempty :=
nonempty_Icc.2 s.fst_le_snd
/-- `{a}` as an interval. -/
@[simps]
def pure (a : α) : NonemptyInterval α :=
⟨⟨a, a⟩, le_rfl⟩
theorem mem_pure_self (a : α) : a ∈ pure a :=
⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩
theorem pure_injective : Injective (pure : α → NonemptyInterval α) := fun _ _ =>
congr_arg <| Prod.fst ∘ toProd
@[simp]
theorem dual_pure (a : α) : dual (pure a) = pure (toDual a) :=
rfl
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (NonemptyInterval α) :=
⟨pure default⟩
instance [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (NonemptyInterval α) :=
Nonempty.map pure (by infer_instance)
instance [Nontrivial α] : Nontrivial (NonemptyInterval α) :=
pure_injective.nontrivial
/-- Pushforward of nonempty intervals. -/
@[simps!]
def map (f : α →o β) (a : NonemptyInterval α) : NonemptyInterval β :=
⟨a.toProd.map f f, f.mono a.fst_le_snd⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α →o β) (a : α) : (pure a).map f = pure (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β →o γ) (f : α →o β) (a : NonemptyInterval α) :
(a.map f).map g = a.map (g.comp f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_map (f : α →o β) (a : NonemptyInterval α) :
dual (a.map f) = a.dual.map f.dual :=
rfl
/-- Binary pushforward of nonempty intervals. -/
@[simps]
def map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (h₀ : ∀ b, Monotone fun a => f a b) (h₁ : ∀ a, Monotone (f a)) :
NonemptyInterval α → NonemptyInterval β → NonemptyInterval γ := fun s t =>
⟨(f s.fst t.fst, f s.snd t.snd), (h₀ _ s.fst_le_snd).trans <| h₁ _ t.fst_le_snd⟩
@[simp]
theorem map₂_pure (f : α → β → γ) (h₀ h₁) (a : α) (b : β) :
map₂ f h₀ h₁ (pure a) (pure b) = pure (f a b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (h₀ h₁ s t) :
dual (map₂ f h₀ h₁ s t) =
map₂ (fun a b => toDual <| f (ofDual a) <| ofDual b) (fun _ => (h₀ _).dual)
(fun _ => (h₁ _).dual) (dual s) (dual t) :=
rfl
variable [BoundedOrder α]
instance : OrderTop (NonemptyInterval α) where
top := ⟨⟨⊥, ⊤⟩, bot_le⟩
le_top _ := ⟨bot_le, le_top⟩
@[simp]
theorem dual_top : dual (⊤ : NonemptyInterval α) = ⊤ :=
rfl
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] {s t : NonemptyInterval α} {a b : α}
instance : PartialOrder (NonemptyInterval α) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ toDualProd_injective
/-- Consider a nonempty interval `[a, b]` as the set `[a, b]`. -/
def coeHom : NonemptyInterval α ↪o Set α :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (fun s => Icc s.fst s.snd) fun s _ => Icc_subset_Icc_iff s.fst_le_snd
instance setLike : SetLike (NonemptyInterval α) α where
coe s := Icc s.fst s.snd
coe_injective' := coeHom.injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊆ t ↔ (s : NonemptyInterval α) ≤ t :=
(@coeHom α _).le_iff_le
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ssubset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊂ t ↔ s < t :=
(@coeHom α _).lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : NonemptyInterval α → Set α) = ((↑) : NonemptyInterval α → Set α) :=
rfl
theorem coe_def (s : NonemptyInterval α) : (s : Set α) = Set.Icc s.toProd.1 s.toProd.2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pure (a : α) : (pure a : Set α) = {a} :=
Icc_self _
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure : b ∈ pure a ↔ b = a := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_pure, mem_singleton_iff]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top [BoundedOrder α] : ((⊤ : NonemptyInterval α) : Set α) = univ :=
Icc_bot_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_dual (s : NonemptyInterval α) : (dual s : Set αᵒᵈ) = ofDual ⁻¹' s :=
Icc_toDual
theorem subset_coe_map (f : α →o β) (s : NonemptyInterval α) : f '' s ⊆ s.map f :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ ha => ⟨f.mono ha.1, f.mono ha.2⟩
end PartialOrder
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α]
instance : Max (NonemptyInterval α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨⟨s.fst ⊓ t.fst, s.snd ⊔ t.snd⟩, inf_le_left.trans <| s.fst_le_snd.trans le_sup_left⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeSup (NonemptyInterval α) :=
toDualProd_injective.semilatticeSup _ fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sup (s t : NonemptyInterval α) : (s ⊔ t).fst = s.fst ⊓ t.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sup (s t : NonemptyInterval α) : (s ⊔ t).snd = s.snd ⊔ t.snd :=
rfl
end Lattice
end NonemptyInterval
/-- The closed intervals in an order.
We represent intervals either as `⊥` or a nonempty interval given by its endpoints `fst`, `snd`.
To convert intervals to the set of elements between these endpoints, use the coercion
`Interval α → Set α`. -/
abbrev Interval (α : Type*) [LE α] :=
WithBot (NonemptyInterval α)
namespace Interval
section LE
variable [LE α]
-- The `Inhabited, LE, OrderBot` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : Inhabited (Interval α) := WithBot.inhabited
instance : LE (Interval α) := WithBot.le
instance : OrderBot (Interval α) := WithBot.orderBot
instance : Coe (NonemptyInterval α) (Interval α) :=
WithBot.coe
instance canLift : CanLift (Interval α) (NonemptyInterval α) (↑) fun r => r ≠ ⊥ :=
WithBot.canLift
/-- Recursor for `Interval` using the preferred forms `⊥` and `↑a`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator, cases_eliminator]
def recBotCoe {C : Interval α → Sort*} (bot : C ⊥) (coe : ∀ a : NonemptyInterval α, C a) :
∀ n : Interval α, C n :=
WithBot.recBotCoe bot coe
theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : NonemptyInterval α → Interval α) :=
WithBot.coe_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {s t : NonemptyInterval α} : (s : Interval α) = t ↔ s = t :=
WithBot.coe_inj
protected
theorem «forall» {p : Interval α → Prop} : (∀ s, p s) ↔ p ⊥ ∧ ∀ s : NonemptyInterval α, p s :=
Option.forall
protected
theorem «exists» {p : Interval α → Prop} : (∃ s, p s) ↔ p ⊥ ∨ ∃ s : NonemptyInterval α, p s :=
Option.exists
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Interval α) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Unique (Option _)
/-- Turn an interval into an interval in the dual order. -/
def dual : Interval α ≃ Interval αᵒᵈ :=
NonemptyInterval.dual.optionCongr
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ]
instance : Preorder (Interval α) :=
WithBot.preorder
/-- `{a}` as an interval. -/
def pure (a : α) : Interval α :=
NonemptyInterval.pure a
theorem pure_injective : Injective (pure : α → Interval α) :=
coe_injective.comp NonemptyInterval.pure_injective
@[simp]
theorem dual_pure (a : α) : dual (pure a) = pure (toDual a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_bot : dual (⊥ : Interval α) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_ne_bot {a : α} : pure a ≠ ⊥ :=
WithBot.coe_ne_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_ne_pure {a : α} : ⊥ ≠ pure a :=
WithBot.bot_ne_coe
instance [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Interval α) :=
Option.nontrivial
/-- Pushforward of intervals. -/
def map (f : α →o β) : Interval α → Interval β :=
WithBot.map (NonemptyInterval.map f)
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α →o β) (a : α) : (pure a).map f = pure (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β →o γ) (f : α →o β) (s : Interval α) : (s.map f).map g = s.map (g.comp f) :=
Option.map_map _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem dual_map (f : α →o β) (s : Interval α) : dual (s.map f) = s.dual.map f.dual := by
cases s
· rfl
· exact WithBot.map_comm rfl _
variable [BoundedOrder α]
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder (Interval α) :=
WithBot.instBoundedOrder
@[simp]
theorem dual_top : dual (⊤ : Interval α) = ⊤ :=
rfl
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] {s t : Interval α} {a b : α}
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Interval α) :=
WithBot.partialOrder
/-- Consider an interval `[a, b]` as the set `[a, b]`. -/
def coeHom : Interval α ↪o Set α :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff
(fun s =>
match s with
| ⊥ => ∅
| some s => s)
fun s t =>
match s, t with
| ⊥, _ => iff_of_true bot_le bot_le
| some s, ⊥ =>
iff_of_false (fun h => s.coe_nonempty.ne_empty <| le_bot_iff.1 h) (WithBot.not_coe_le_bot _)
| some _, some _ => (@NonemptyInterval.coeHom α _).le_iff_le.trans WithBot.coe_le_coe.symm
instance setLike : SetLike (Interval α) α where
coe := coeHom
coe_injective' := coeHom.injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊆ t ↔ s ≤ t :=
(@coeHom α _).le_iff_le
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSubset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊂ t ↔ s < t :=
(@coeHom α _).lt_iff_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pure (a : α) : (pure a : Set α) = {a} :=
Icc_self _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_coe (s : NonemptyInterval α) : ((s : Interval α) : Set α) = s :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
| theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Interval α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Basic.lean | 420 | 423 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn, Antoine Labelle, Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Quiver.Path
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Quiver.Push
/-!
## Symmetric quivers and arrow reversal
This file contains constructions related to symmetric quivers:
* `Symmetrify V` adds formal inverses to each arrow of `V`.
* `HasReverse` is the class of quivers where each arrow has an assigned formal inverse.
* `HasInvolutiveReverse` extends `HasReverse` by requiring that the reverse of the reverse
is equal to the original arrow.
* `Prefunctor.PreserveReverse` is the class of prefunctors mapping reverses to reverses.
* `Symmetrify.of`, `Symmetrify.lift`, and the associated lemmas witness the universal property
of `Symmetrify`.
-/
universe v u w v'
namespace Quiver
/-- A type synonym for the symmetrized quiver (with an arrow both ways for each original arrow).
NB: this does not work for `Prop`-valued quivers. It requires `[Quiver.{v+1} V]`. -/
def Symmetrify (V : Type*) := V
instance symmetrifyQuiver (V : Type u) [Quiver V] : Quiver (Symmetrify V) :=
⟨fun a b : V ↦ (a ⟶ b) ⊕ (b ⟶ a)⟩
variable (U V W : Type*) [Quiver.{u + 1} U] [Quiver.{v + 1} V] [Quiver.{w + 1} W]
/-- A quiver `HasReverse` if we can reverse an arrow `p` from `a` to `b` to get an arrow
`p.reverse` from `b` to `a`. -/
class HasReverse where
/-- the map which sends an arrow to its reverse -/
reverse' : ∀ {a b : V}, (a ⟶ b) → (b ⟶ a)
/-- Reverse the direction of an arrow. -/
def reverse {V} [Quiver.{v + 1} V] [HasReverse V] {a b : V} : (a ⟶ b) → (b ⟶ a) :=
HasReverse.reverse'
/-- A quiver `HasInvolutiveReverse` if reversing twice is the identity. -/
class HasInvolutiveReverse extends HasReverse V where
/-- `reverse` is involutive -/
inv' : ∀ {a b : V} (f : a ⟶ b), reverse (reverse f) = f
variable {U V W}
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse [h : HasInvolutiveReverse V] {a b : V} (f : a ⟶ b) :
reverse (reverse f) = f := by apply h.inv'
@[simp]
theorem reverse_inj [h : HasInvolutiveReverse V] {a b : V}
(f g : a ⟶ b) : reverse f = reverse g ↔ f = g := by
constructor
· rintro h
simpa using congr_arg Quiver.reverse h
· rintro h
congr
theorem eq_reverse_iff [h : HasInvolutiveReverse V] {a b : V} (f : a ⟶ b)
(g : b ⟶ a) : f = reverse g ↔ reverse f = g := by
rw [← reverse_inj, reverse_reverse]
section MapReverse
variable [HasReverse U] [HasReverse V] [HasReverse W]
/-- A prefunctor preserving reversal of arrows -/
class _root_.Prefunctor.MapReverse (φ : U ⥤q V) : Prop where
/-- The image of a reverse is the reverse of the image. -/
map_reverse' : ∀ {u v : U} (e : u ⟶ v), φ.map (reverse e) = reverse (φ.map e)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prefunctor.map_reverse (φ : U ⥤q V) [φ.MapReverse]
{u v : U} (e : u ⟶ v) : φ.map (reverse e) = reverse (φ.map e) :=
Prefunctor.MapReverse.map_reverse' e
instance _root_.Prefunctor.mapReverseComp
(φ : U ⥤q V) (ψ : V ⥤q W) [φ.MapReverse] [ψ.MapReverse] :
(φ ⋙q ψ).MapReverse where
map_reverse' e := by
simp only [Prefunctor.comp_map, Prefunctor.MapReverse.map_reverse']
instance _root_.Prefunctor.mapReverseId :
(Prefunctor.id U).MapReverse where
map_reverse' _ := rfl
end MapReverse
instance : HasReverse (Symmetrify V) :=
⟨fun e => e.swap⟩
instance :
HasInvolutiveReverse
(Symmetrify V) where
toHasReverse := ⟨fun e ↦ e.swap⟩
inv' e := congr_fun Sum.swap_swap_eq e
@[simp]
theorem symmetrify_reverse {a b : Symmetrify V} (e : a ⟶ b) : reverse e = e.swap :=
rfl
section Paths
/-- Shorthand for the "forward" arrow corresponding to `f` in `symmetrify V` -/
abbrev Hom.toPos {X Y : V} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (Quiver.symmetrifyQuiver V).Hom X Y :=
Sum.inl f
/-- Shorthand for the "backward" arrow corresponding to `f` in `symmetrify V` -/
abbrev Hom.toNeg {X Y : V} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (Quiver.symmetrifyQuiver V).Hom Y X :=
Sum.inr f
/-- Reverse the direction of a path. -/
@[simp]
def Path.reverse [HasReverse V] {a : V} : ∀ {b}, Path a b → Path b a
| _, Path.nil => Path.nil
| _, Path.cons p e => (Quiver.reverse e).toPath.comp p.reverse
@[simp]
theorem Path.reverse_toPath [HasReverse V] {a b : V} (f : a ⟶ b) :
f.toPath.reverse = (Quiver.reverse f).toPath :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Path.reverse_comp [HasReverse V] {a b c : V} (p : Path a b) (q : Path b c) :
(p.comp q).reverse = q.reverse.comp p.reverse := by
induction q with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ h => simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem Path.reverse_reverse [h : HasInvolutiveReverse V] {a b : V} (p : Path a b) :
p.reverse.reverse = p := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ h =>
rw [Path.reverse, Path.reverse_comp, h, Path.reverse_toPath, Quiver.reverse_reverse]
rfl
end Paths
namespace Symmetrify
/-- The inclusion of a quiver in its symmetrification -/
@[simps]
def of : Prefunctor V (Symmetrify V) where
obj := id
map := Sum.inl
variable {V' : Type*} [Quiver.{v' + 1} V']
/-- Given a quiver `V'` with reversible arrows, a prefunctor to `V'` can be lifted to one from
`Symmetrify V` to `V'` -/
def lift [HasReverse V'] (φ : Prefunctor V V') :
Prefunctor (Symmetrify V) V' where
obj := φ.obj
map
| Sum.inl g => φ.map g
| Sum.inr g => reverse (φ.map g)
theorem lift_spec [HasReverse V'] (φ : Prefunctor V V') :
Symmetrify.of.comp (Symmetrify.lift φ) = φ := by
fapply Prefunctor.ext
· rintro X
rfl
· rintro X Y f
rfl
theorem lift_reverse [h : HasInvolutiveReverse V']
(φ : Prefunctor V V') {X Y : Symmetrify V} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(Symmetrify.lift φ).map (Quiver.reverse f) = Quiver.reverse ((Symmetrify.lift φ).map f) := by
dsimp [Symmetrify.lift]; cases f
· simp only
rfl
· simp only [reverse_reverse]
rfl
/-- `lift φ` is the only prefunctor extending `φ` and preserving reverses. -/
theorem lift_unique [HasReverse V'] (φ : V ⥤q V') (Φ : Symmetrify V ⥤q V') (hΦ : (of ⋙q Φ) = φ)
(hΦinv : ∀ {X Y : Symmetrify V} (f : X ⟶ Y),
Φ.map (Quiver.reverse f) = Quiver.reverse (Φ.map f)) :
Φ = Symmetrify.lift φ := by
subst_vars
fapply Prefunctor.ext
· rintro X
rfl
· rintro X Y f
cases f
· rfl
· exact hΦinv (Sum.inl _)
|
/-- A prefunctor canonically defines a prefunctor of the symmetrifications. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.Prefunctor.symmetrify (φ : U ⥤q V) : Symmetrify U ⥤q Symmetrify V where
obj := φ.obj
map := Sum.map φ.map φ.map
instance _root_.Prefunctor.symmetrify_mapReverse (φ : U ⥤q V) :
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Quiver/Symmetric.lean | 197 | 204 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kenny Lau, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Chain
/-!
# Ranges of naturals as lists
This file shows basic results about `List.iota`, `List.range`, `List.range'`
and defines `List.finRange`.
`finRange n` is the list of elements of `Fin n`.
`iota n = [n, n - 1, ..., 1]` and `range n = [0, ..., n - 1]` are basic list constructions used for
tactics. `range' a b = [a, ..., a + b - 1]` is there to help prove properties about them.
Actual maths should use `List.Ico` instead.
-/
universe u
open Nat
namespace List
variable {α : Type u}
theorem getElem_range'_1 {n m} (i) (H : i < (range' n m).length) :
(range' n m)[i] = n + i := by simp
theorem chain'_range_succ (r : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) :
Chain' r (range n.succ) ↔ ∀ m < n, r m m.succ := by
rw [range_succ]
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· rw [range_succ]
simp only [append_assoc, singleton_append, chain'_append_cons_cons, chain'_singleton, and_true]
rw [hn, forall_lt_succ]
theorem chain_range_succ (r : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) (n a : ℕ) :
Chain r a (range n.succ) ↔ r a 0 ∧ ∀ m < n, r m m.succ := by
rw [range_succ_eq_map, chain_cons, and_congr_right_iff, ← chain'_range_succ, range_succ_eq_map]
exact fun _ => Iff.rfl
section Ranges
/-- From `l : List ℕ`, construct `l.ranges : List (List ℕ)` such that
`l.ranges.map List.length = l` and `l.ranges.join = range l.sum`
* Example: `[1,2,3].ranges = [[0],[1,2],[3,4,5]]` -/
def ranges : List ℕ → List (List ℕ)
| [] => nil
| a::l => range a::(ranges l).map (map (a + ·))
/-- The members of `l.ranges` are pairwise disjoint -/
theorem ranges_disjoint (l : List ℕ) :
Pairwise Disjoint (ranges l) := by
induction l with
| nil => exact Pairwise.nil
| cons a l hl =>
simp only [ranges, pairwise_cons]
constructor
· intro s hs
obtain ⟨s', _, rfl⟩ := mem_map.mp hs
intro u hu
rw [mem_map]
rintro ⟨v, _, rfl⟩
rw [mem_range] at hu
omega
· rw [pairwise_map]
apply Pairwise.imp _ hl
intro u v
apply disjoint_map
exact fun u v => Nat.add_left_cancel
/-- The lengths of the members of `l.ranges` are those given by `l` -/
theorem ranges_length (l : List ℕ) :
l.ranges.map length = l := by
induction l with
| nil => simp only [ranges, map_nil]
| cons a l hl => -- (a :: l)
simp only [ranges, map_cons, length_range, map_map, cons.injEq, true_and]
conv_rhs => rw [← hl]
apply map_congr_left
intro s _
simp only [Function.comp_apply, length_map]
end Ranges
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Range.lean | 104 | 112 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Convex
/-!
# Sides of affine subspaces
This file defines notions of two points being on the same or opposite sides of an affine subspace.
## Main definitions
* `s.WSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.WOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
-/
variable {R V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
namespace AffineSubspace
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of `s`. -/
def WSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of `s`. -/
def SSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WSameSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def WOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def SOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WOppSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
theorem WSameSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
simp_rw [SSameSide, hf.wSameSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wSameSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sSameSide_map_iff
theorem WOppSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
simp_rw [SOppSide, hf.wOppSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wOppSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sOppSide_map_iff
theorem WSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem WOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SSameSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SSameSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem SOppSide.wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SOppSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SOppSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem wSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WSameSide x y ↔ s.WSameSide y x :=
⟨fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩,
fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩⟩
alias ⟨WSameSide.symm, _⟩ := wSameSide_comm
theorem sSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SSameSide x y ↔ s.SSameSide y x := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SSameSide.symm, _⟩ := sSameSide_comm
theorem wOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WOppSide x y ↔ s.WOppSide y x := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
alias ⟨WOppSide.symm, _⟩ := wOppSide_comm
theorem sOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SOppSide x y ↔ s.SOppSide y x := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SOppSide.symm, _⟩ := sOppSide_comm
theorem not_wSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WSameSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SSameSide x y :=
fun h => not_wSameSide_bot x y h.wSameSide
theorem not_wOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WOppSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SOppSide x y :=
fun h => not_wOppSide_bot x y h.wOppSide
@[simp]
theorem wSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.WSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => h.nonempty, fun ⟨p, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp, p, hp, SameRay.rfl⟩⟩
theorem sSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.SSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty ∧ x ∉ s :=
⟨fun ⟨h, hx, _⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.1 h, hx⟩, fun ⟨h, hx⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.2 h, hx, hx⟩⟩
theorem wSameSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wSameSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
(wSameSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wOppSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wOppSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
(wOppSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wSameSide_comm]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sSameSide_comm]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
| refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Side.lean | 260 | 264 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
/-!
# Linearity of the L-series of `f` as a function of `f`
We show that the `LSeries` of `f : ℕ → ℂ` is a linear function of `f` (assuming convergence
of both L-series when adding two functions).
-/
/-!
### Addition
-/
open LSeries
lemma LSeries.term_add (f g : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) : term (f + g) s = term f s + term g s := by
ext ⟨- | n⟩ <;>
simp [add_div]
lemma LSeries.term_add_apply (f g : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
term (f + g) s n = term f s n + term g s n := by
simp [term_add]
lemma LSeriesHasSum.add {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s a b : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesHasSum f s a)
(hg : LSeriesHasSum g s b) :
LSeriesHasSum (f + g) s (a + b) := by
simpa [LSeriesHasSum, term_add] using HasSum.add hf hg
lemma LSeriesSummable.add {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s)
(hg : LSeriesSummable g s) :
LSeriesSummable (f + g) s := by
simpa [LSeriesSummable, ← term_add_apply] using Summable.add hf hg
@[simp]
lemma LSeries_add {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s) (hg : LSeriesSummable g s) :
LSeries (f + g) s = LSeries f s + LSeries g s := by
simpa [LSeries, term_add] using hf.tsum_add hg
/-!
### Negation
-/
lemma LSeries.term_neg (f : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) : term (-f) s = -term f s := by
ext ⟨- | n⟩ <;>
simp [neg_div]
lemma LSeries.term_neg_apply (f : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : term (-f) s n = -term f s n := by
simp [term_neg]
lemma LSeriesHasSum.neg {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s a : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesHasSum f s a) :
LSeriesHasSum (-f) s (-a) := by
simpa [LSeriesHasSum, term_neg] using HasSum.neg hf
lemma LSeriesSummable.neg {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s) :
LSeriesSummable (-f) s := by
simpa [LSeriesSummable, term_neg] using Summable.neg hf
@[simp]
lemma LSeriesSummable.neg_iff {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} :
LSeriesSummable (-f) s ↔ LSeriesSummable f s :=
⟨fun H ↦ neg_neg f ▸ H.neg, .neg⟩
@[simp]
lemma LSeries_neg (f : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) : LSeries (-f) s = -LSeries f s := by
simp [LSeries, term_neg_apply, tsum_neg]
/-!
### Subtraction
-/
lemma LSeries.term_sub (f g : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) : term (f - g) s = term f s - term g s := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, term_add, term_neg]
lemma LSeries.term_sub_apply (f g : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
term (f - g) s n = term f s n - term g s n := by
rw [term_sub, Pi.sub_apply]
lemma LSeriesHasSum.sub {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s a b : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesHasSum f s a)
(hg : LSeriesHasSum g s b) :
LSeriesHasSum (f - g) s (a - b) := by
simpa [LSeriesHasSum, term_sub] using HasSum.sub hf hg
lemma LSeriesSummable.sub {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s)
(hg : LSeriesSummable g s) :
LSeriesSummable (f - g) s := by
simpa [LSeriesSummable, ← term_sub_apply] using Summable.sub hf hg
@[simp]
lemma LSeries_sub {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s) (hg : LSeriesSummable g s) :
LSeries (f - g) s = LSeries f s - LSeries g s := by
simpa [LSeries, term_sub] using hf.tsum_sub hg
/-!
### Scalar multiplication
-/
lemma LSeries.term_smul (f : ℕ → ℂ) (c s : ℂ) : term (c • f) s = c • term f s := by
ext ⟨- | n⟩ <;>
simp [mul_div_assoc]
lemma LSeries.term_smul_apply (f : ℕ → ℂ) (c s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
term (c • f) s n = c * term f s n := by
simp [term_smul]
lemma LSeriesHasSum.smul {f : ℕ → ℂ} (c : ℂ) {s a : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesHasSum f s a) :
LSeriesHasSum (c • f) s (c * a) := by
simpa [LSeriesHasSum, term_smul] using hf.const_smul c
lemma LSeriesSummable.smul {f : ℕ → ℂ} (c : ℂ) {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s) :
LSeriesSummable (c • f) s := by
simpa [LSeriesSummable, term_smul] using hf.const_smul c
lemma LSeriesSummable.of_smul {f : ℕ → ℂ} {c s : ℂ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (hf : LSeriesSummable (c • f) s) :
LSeriesSummable f s := by
simpa [hc] using hf.smul (c⁻¹)
lemma LSeriesSummable.smul_iff {f : ℕ → ℂ} {c s : ℂ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
LSeriesSummable (c • f) s ↔ LSeriesSummable f s :=
| ⟨of_smul hc, smul c⟩
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Linearity.lean | 125 | 127 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Submonoid
/-!
# Direct sum
This file defines the direct sum of abelian groups, indexed by a discrete type.
## Notation
`⨁ i, β i` is the n-ary direct sum `DirectSum`.
This notation is in the `DirectSum` locale, accessible after `open DirectSum`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_sum
-/
open Function
universe u v w u₁
variable (ι : Type v) (β : ι → Type w)
/-- `DirectSum ι β` is the direct sum of a family of additive commutative monoids `β i`.
Note: `open DirectSum` will enable the notation `⨁ i, β i` for `DirectSum ι β`. -/
def DirectSum [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : Type _ :=
Π₀ i, β i
-- The `AddCommMonoid, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : Inhabited (DirectSum ι β) :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (Π₀ i, β i))
instance [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : AddCommMonoid (DirectSum ι β) :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (Π₀ i, β i))
instance [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : DFunLike (DirectSum ι β) _ fun i : ι => β i :=
inferInstanceAs (DFunLike (Π₀ i, β i) _ _)
instance [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : CoeFun (DirectSum ι β) fun _ => ∀ i : ι, β i :=
inferInstanceAs (CoeFun (Π₀ i, β i) fun _ => ∀ i : ι, β i)
/-- `⨁ i, f i` is notation for `DirectSum _ f` and equals the direct sum of `fun i ↦ f i`.
Taking the direct sum over multiple arguments is possible, e.g. `⨁ (i) (j), f i j`. -/
scoped[DirectSum] notation3 "⨁ "(...)", "r:(scoped f => DirectSum _ f) => r
-- Porting note: The below recreates some of the lean3 notation, not fully yet
-- section
-- open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
-- syntax (name := bigdirectsum) "⨁ " extBinders ", " term : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigdirectsum)
-- | `(⨁ $_:ident, $y:ident → $z:ident) => `(DirectSum _ (fun $y ↦ $z))
-- | `(⨁ $x:ident, $p) => `(DirectSum _ (fun $x ↦ $p))
-- | `(⨁ $_:ident : $t:ident, $p) => `(DirectSum _ (fun $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(⨁ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) => `(DirectSum _ (fun $x ↦ fun $y ↦ $p))
-- end
instance [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DecidableEq (β i)] :
DecidableEq (DirectSum ι β) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableEq (Π₀ i, β i)
namespace DirectSum
variable {ι}
/-- Coercion from a `DirectSum` to a pi type is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coeFnAddMonoidHom [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : (⨁ i, β i) →+ (Π i, β i) where
toFun x := x
__ := DFinsupp.coeFnAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
lemma coeFnAddMonoidHom_apply [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] (v : ⨁ i, β i) :
coeFnAddMonoidHom β v = v :=
rfl
section AddCommGroup
variable [∀ i, AddCommGroup (β i)]
instance : AddCommGroup (DirectSum ι β) :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (Π₀ i, β i))
variable {β}
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (g₁ g₂ : ⨁ i, β i) (i : ι) : (g₁ - g₂) i = g₁ i - g₂ i :=
rfl
end AddCommGroup
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)]
@[ext] theorem ext {x y : DirectSum ι β} (w : ∀ i, x i = y i) : x = y :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ w
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (i : ι) : (0 : ⨁ i, β i) i = 0 :=
rfl
variable {β}
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : ⨁ i, β i) (i : ι) : (g₁ + g₂) i = g₁ i + g₂ i :=
rfl
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq ι]
variable (β)
/-- `mk β s x` is the element of `⨁ i, β i` that is zero outside `s`
and has coefficient `x i` for `i` in `s`. -/
def mk (s : Finset ι) : (∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), β i.1) →+ ⨁ i, β i where
toFun := DFinsupp.mk s
map_add' _ _ := DFinsupp.mk_add
map_zero' := DFinsupp.mk_zero
/-- `of i` is the natural inclusion map from `β i` to `⨁ i, β i`. -/
def of (i : ι) : β i →+ ⨁ i, β i :=
DFinsupp.singleAddHom β i
variable {β}
@[simp]
theorem of_eq_same (i : ι) (x : β i) : (of _ i x) i = x :=
DFinsupp.single_eq_same
theorem of_eq_of_ne (i j : ι) (x : β i) (h : i ≠ j) : (of _ i x) j = 0 :=
DFinsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
lemma of_apply {i : ι} (j : ι) (x : β i) : of β i x j = if h : i = j then Eq.recOn h x else 0 :=
DFinsupp.single_apply
theorem mk_apply_of_mem {s : Finset ι} {f : ∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), β i.val} {n : ι} (hn : n ∈ s) :
mk β s f n = f ⟨n, hn⟩ := by
dsimp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, mk, AddMonoidHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, DFinsupp.mk_apply]
rw [dif_pos hn]
theorem mk_apply_of_not_mem {s : Finset ι} {f : ∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), β i.val} {n : ι} (hn : n ∉ s) :
mk β s f n = 0 := by
dsimp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, mk, AddMonoidHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, DFinsupp.mk_apply]
rw [dif_neg hn]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero [∀ (i : ι) (x : β i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] : (0 : ⨁ i, β i).support = ∅ :=
| DFinsupp.support_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_of [∀ (i : ι) (x : β i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (i : ι) (x : β i) (h : x ≠ 0) :
(of _ i x).support = {i} :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/DirectSum/Basic.lean | 155 | 159 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Interval
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ConditionallyCompleteOrder
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Discrete
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Bounded
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
/-!
# Topology on the integers
The structure of a metric space on `ℤ` is introduced in this file, induced from `ℝ`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Metric Set Topology
namespace Int
instance : Dist ℤ :=
⟨fun x y => dist (x : ℝ) y⟩
theorem dist_eq (x y : ℤ) : dist x y = |(x : ℝ) - y| := rfl
theorem dist_eq' (m n : ℤ) : dist m n = |m - n| := by rw [dist_eq]; norm_cast
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem dist_cast_real (x y : ℤ) : dist (x : ℝ) y = dist x y :=
rfl
theorem pairwise_one_le_dist : Pairwise fun m n : ℤ => 1 ≤ dist m n := by
intro m n hne
rw [dist_eq]; norm_cast; rwa [← zero_add (1 : ℤ), Int.add_one_le_iff, abs_pos, sub_ne_zero]
theorem isUniformEmbedding_coe_real : IsUniformEmbedding ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ) :=
isUniformEmbedding_bot_of_pairwise_le_dist zero_lt_one pairwise_one_le_dist
theorem isClosedEmbedding_coe_real : IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ) :=
isClosedEmbedding_of_pairwise_le_dist zero_lt_one pairwise_one_le_dist
instance : MetricSpace ℤ := Int.isUniformEmbedding_coe_real.comapMetricSpace _
theorem preimage_ball (x : ℤ) (r : ℝ) : (↑) ⁻¹' ball (x : ℝ) r = ball x r := rfl
theorem preimage_closedBall (x : ℤ) (r : ℝ) : (↑) ⁻¹' closedBall (x : ℝ) r = closedBall x r := rfl
theorem ball_eq_Ioo (x : ℤ) (r : ℝ) : ball x r = Ioo ⌊↑x - r⌋ ⌈↑x + r⌉ := by
rw [← preimage_ball, Real.ball_eq_Ioo, preimage_Ioo]
theorem closedBall_eq_Icc (x : ℤ) (r : ℝ) : closedBall x r = Icc ⌈↑x - r⌉ ⌊↑x + r⌋ := by
rw [← preimage_closedBall, Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, preimage_Icc]
instance : ProperSpace ℤ :=
⟨fun x r => by
rw [closedBall_eq_Icc]
exact (Set.finite_Icc _ _).isCompact⟩
@[simp]
theorem cobounded_eq : Bornology.cobounded ℤ = atBot ⊔ atTop := by
simp_rw [← comap_dist_right_atTop (0 : ℤ), dist_eq', sub_zero,
← comap_abs_atTop, ← @Int.comap_cast_atTop ℝ, comap_comap]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem cofinite_eq : (cofinite : Filter ℤ) = atBot ⊔ atTop := by
rw [← cocompact_eq_cofinite, cocompact_eq_atBot_atTop]
end Int
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/Int.lean | 77 | 79 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Slope
/-!
# Line derivatives
We define the line derivative of a function `f : E → F`, at a point `x : E` along a vector `v : E`,
as the element `f' : F` such that `f (x + t • v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` as `t` tends to `0` in
the scalar field `𝕜`, if it exists. It is denoted by `lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v`.
This notion is generally less well behaved than the full Fréchet derivative (for instance, the
composition of functions which are line-differentiable is not line-differentiable in general).
The Fréchet derivative should therefore be favored over this one in general, although the line
derivative may sometimes prove handy.
The line derivative in direction `v` is also called the Gateaux derivative in direction `v`,
although the term "Gateaux derivative" is sometimes reserved for the situation where there is
such a derivative in all directions, for the map `v ↦ lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v` (which doesn't have to be
linear in general).
## Main definition and results
We mimic the definitions and statements for the Fréchet derivative and the one-dimensional
derivative. We define in particular the following objects:
* `LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v`
* `LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v`
* `HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v`
* `HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f s x v`
* `lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v`
* `lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v`
and develop about them a basic API inspired by the one for the Fréchet derivative.
We depart from the Fréchet derivative in two places, as the dependence of the following predicates
on the direction would make them barely usable:
* We do not define an analogue of the predicate `UniqueDiffOn`;
* We do not define `LineDifferentiableOn` nor `LineDifferentiable`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
section Module
/-!
Results that do not rely on a topological structure on `E`
-/
variable (𝕜)
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` along the direction `v` in the set `s`.
That is, `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0` and `x + t v ∈ s`.
Note that this definition is less well behaved than the total Fréchet derivative, which
should generally be favored over this one. -/
def HasLineDerivWithinAt (f : E → F) (f' : F) (s : Set E) (x : E) (v : E) :=
HasDerivWithinAt (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) f' ((fun t ↦ x + t • v) ⁻¹' s) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` along the direction `v`.
That is, `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0`.
Note that this definition is less well behaved than the total Fréchet derivative, which
should generally be favored over this one. -/
def HasLineDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : F) (x : E) (v : E) :=
HasDerivAt (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) f' (0 : 𝕜)
/-- `f` is line-differentiable at the point `x` in the direction `v` in the set `s` if there
exists `f'` such that `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0` and `x + t v ∈ s`.
-/
def LineDifferentiableWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) (v : E) : Prop :=
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) ((fun t ↦ x + t • v) ⁻¹' s) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- `f` is line-differentiable at the point `x` in the direction `v` if there
exists `f'` such that `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0`. -/
def LineDifferentiableAt (f : E → F) (x : E) (v : E) : Prop :=
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- Line derivative of `f` at the point `x` in the direction `v` within the set `s`, if it exists.
Zero otherwise.
If the line derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v`), then
`f (x + t v) = f x + t lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0` and `x + t v ∈ s`.
-/
def lineDerivWithin (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) (v : E) : F :=
derivWithin (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) ((fun t ↦ x + t • v) ⁻¹' s) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- Line derivative of `f` at the point `x` in the direction `v`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the line derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v`), then
`f (x + t v) = f x + t lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0`.
-/
def lineDeriv (f : E → F) (x : E) (v : E) : F :=
deriv (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) (0 : 𝕜)
variable {𝕜}
variable {f f₁ : E → F} {f' f₀' f₁' : F} {s t : Set E} {x v : E}
lemma HasLineDerivWithinAt.mono (hf : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' t x v :=
HasDerivWithinAt.mono hf (preimage_mono hst)
lemma HasLineDerivAt.hasLineDerivWithinAt (hf : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) (s : Set E) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v :=
HasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt hf
lemma HasLineDerivWithinAt.lineDifferentiableWithinAt (hf : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v :=
HasDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt hf
theorem HasLineDerivAt.lineDifferentiableAt (hf : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) :
LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v :=
HasDerivAt.differentiableAt hf
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.hasLineDerivWithinAt (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f (lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v) s x v :=
DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt h
theorem LineDifferentiableAt.hasLineDerivAt (h : LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v) :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f (lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v) x v :=
DifferentiableAt.hasDerivAt h
@[simp] lemma hasLineDerivWithinAt_univ :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' univ x v ↔ HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v := by
simp only [HasLineDerivWithinAt, HasLineDerivAt, preimage_univ, hasDerivWithinAt_univ]
theorem lineDerivWithin_zero_of_not_lineDifferentiableWithinAt
(h : ¬LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v = 0 :=
derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h
theorem lineDeriv_zero_of_not_lineDifferentiableAt (h : ¬LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v) :
lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v = 0 :=
deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h
theorem hasLineDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v ↔
(fun t : 𝕜 => f (x + t • v) - f x - t • f') =o[𝓝 0] fun t => t := by
simp only [HasLineDerivAt, hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero, zero_add, zero_smul, add_zero]
theorem HasLineDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f₀' x v) (h₁ : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f₁' x v) :
f₀' = f₁' :=
HasDerivAt.unique h₀ h₁
protected theorem HasLineDerivAt.lineDeriv (h : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) :
lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v = f' := by
rw [h.unique h.lineDifferentiableAt.hasLineDerivAt]
theorem lineDifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x v ↔ LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v := by
simp only [LineDifferentiableWithinAt, LineDifferentiableAt, preimage_univ,
differentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem LineDifferentiableAt.lineDifferentiableWithinAt (h : LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v :=
(differentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem lineDerivWithin_univ : lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f univ x v = lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v := by
simp [lineDerivWithin, lineDeriv]
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x v) (st : s ⊆ t) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v :=
(h.hasLineDerivWithinAt.mono st).lineDifferentiableWithinAt
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.congr_mono (h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) (ht : EqOn f₁ f t)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ f' t x v :=
HasDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h (fun _ hy ↦ ht hy) (by simpa using hx) (preimage_mono h₁)
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.congr (h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) (hs : EqOn f₁ f s)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ f' s x v :=
h.congr_mono hs hx (Subset.refl _)
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.congr' (h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v)
(hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ f' s x v :=
h.congr hs (hs hx)
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_mono (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v)
(ht : EqOn f₁ f t) (hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ t x v :=
(HasLineDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h.hasLineDerivWithinAt ht hx h₁).differentiableWithinAt
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.congr (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v)
(ht : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x v :=
LineDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_mono h ht hx (Subset.refl _)
theorem lineDerivWithin_congr (hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x v = lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v :=
derivWithin_congr (fun _ hy ↦ hs hy) (by simpa using hx)
theorem lineDerivWithin_congr' (hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x v = lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v :=
lineDerivWithin_congr hs (hs hx)
theorem hasLineDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope_zero :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v ↔
Tendsto (fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x)) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 f') := by
simp only [HasLineDerivAt, hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope_zero, zero_add,
zero_smul, add_zero]
alias ⟨HasLineDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero, _⟩ := hasLineDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope_zero
theorem HasLineDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero_right [Preorder 𝕜] (h : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) :
Tendsto (fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 f') :=
h.tendsto_slope_zero.mono_left (nhdsGT_le_nhdsNE 0)
theorem HasLineDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero_left [Preorder 𝕜] (h : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) :
Tendsto (fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x)) (𝓝[<] 0) (𝓝 f') :=
h.tendsto_slope_zero.mono_left (nhdsLT_le_nhdsNE 0)
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.hasLineDerivAt'
(h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) (hs : ∀ᶠ t : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, x + t • v ∈ s) :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v :=
h.hasDerivAt hs
end Module
section NormedSpace
/-!
Results that need a normed space structure on `E`
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{f f₀ f₁ : E → F} {f' : F} {s t : Set E} {x v : E} {L : E →L[𝕜] F}
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' t x v) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v := by
apply HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin h
apply ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' _ hst (by simp)
apply Continuous.continuousWithinAt; fun_prop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasLineDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasLineDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.hasLineDerivAt
(h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v :=
h.hasLineDerivAt' <| (Continuous.tendsto' (by fun_prop) 0 _ (by simp)).eventually hs
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.lineDifferentiableAt (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v :=
(h.hasLineDerivWithinAt.hasLineDerivAt hs).lineDifferentiableAt
lemma HasFDerivWithinAt.hasLineDerivWithinAt (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f L s x) (v : E) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f (L v) s x v := by
let F := fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v
rw [show x = F (0 : 𝕜) by simp [F]] at hf
have A : HasDerivWithinAt F (0 + (1 : 𝕜) • v) (F ⁻¹' s) 0 :=
((hasDerivAt_const (0 : 𝕜) x).add ((hasDerivAt_id' (0 : 𝕜)).smul_const v)).hasDerivWithinAt
simp only [one_smul, zero_add] at A
exact hf.comp_hasDerivWithinAt (x := (0 : 𝕜)) A (mapsTo_preimage F s)
lemma HasFDerivAt.hasLineDerivAt (hf : HasFDerivAt f L x) (v : E) :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f (L v) x v := by
rw [← hasLineDerivWithinAt_univ]
exact hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasLineDerivWithinAt v
lemma DifferentiableAt.lineDeriv_eq_fderiv (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v = fderiv 𝕜 f x v :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.hasLineDerivAt v).lineDeriv
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v)
(hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x v :=
(h.hasLineDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hst).lineDifferentiableWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias LineDifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem := LineDifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem lineDerivWithin_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v = lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v := by
apply derivWithin_of_mem_nhds
apply (Continuous.continuousAt _).preimage_mem_nhds (by simpa using h)
fun_prop
theorem lineDerivWithin_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v = lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v :=
lineDerivWithin_of_mem_nhds (hs.mem_nhds hx)
theorem hasLineDerivWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v ↔ HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' t x v := by
apply hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set
let F := fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v
have B : ContinuousAt F 0 := by apply Continuous.continuousAt; fun_prop
have : s =ᶠ[𝓝 (F 0)] t := by convert h; simp [F]
exact B.preimage_mem_nhds this
theorem lineDifferentiableWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v ↔ LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x v :=
⟨fun h' ↦ ((hasLineDerivWithinAt_congr_set h).1
h'.hasLineDerivWithinAt).lineDifferentiableWithinAt,
fun h' ↦ ((hasLineDerivWithinAt_congr_set h.symm).1
h'.hasLineDerivWithinAt).lineDifferentiableWithinAt⟩
|
theorem lineDerivWithin_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v = lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f t x v := by
apply derivWithin_congr_set
let F := fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v
have B : ContinuousAt F 0 := by apply Continuous.continuousAt; fun_prop
have : s =ᶠ[𝓝 (F 0)] t := by convert h; simp [F]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/LineDeriv/Basic.lean | 308 | 314 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
/-!
# Products of subalgebras
In this file we define the product of two subalgebras as a subalgebra of the product algebra.
## Main definitions
* `Subalgebra.prod`: the product of two subalgebras.
-/
namespace Subalgebra
open Algebra
variable {R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable (S : Subalgebra R A) (S₁ : Subalgebra R B)
/-- The product of two subalgebras is a subalgebra. -/
def prod : Subalgebra R (A × B) :=
{ S.toSubsemiring.prod S₁.toSubsemiring with
carrier := S ×ˢ S₁
algebraMap_mem' := fun _ => ⟨algebraMap_mem _ _, algebraMap_mem _ _⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem coe_prod : (prod S S₁ : Set (A × B)) = (S : Set A) ×ˢ (S₁ : Set B) :=
rfl
open Subalgebra in
theorem prod_toSubmodule : toSubmodule (S.prod S₁) = (toSubmodule S).prod (toSubmodule S₁) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_prod {S : Subalgebra R A} {S₁ : Subalgebra R B} {x : A × B} :
x ∈ prod S S₁ ↔ x.1 ∈ S ∧ x.2 ∈ S₁ := Set.mem_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_top : (prod ⊤ ⊤ : Subalgebra R (A × B)) = ⊤ := by ext; simp
theorem prod_mono {S T : Subalgebra R A} {S₁ T₁ : Subalgebra R B} :
S ≤ T → S₁ ≤ T₁ → prod S S₁ ≤ prod T T₁ :=
Set.prod_mono
| @[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Subalgebra/Prod.lean | 51 | 51 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SetFamily.Shadow
/-!
# UV-compressions
This file defines UV-compression. It is an operation on a set family that reduces its shadow.
UV-compressing `a : α` along `u v : α` means replacing `a` by `(a ⊔ u) \ v` if `a` and `u` are
disjoint and `v ≤ a`. In some sense, it's moving `a` from `v` to `u`.
UV-compressions are immensely useful to prove the Kruskal-Katona theorem. The idea is that
compressing a set family might decrease the size of its shadow, so iterated compressions hopefully
minimise the shadow.
## Main declarations
* `UV.compress`: `compress u v a` is `a` compressed along `u` and `v`.
* `UV.compression`: `compression u v s` is the compression of the set family `s` along `u` and `v`.
It is the compressions of the elements of `s` whose compression is not already in `s` along with
the element whose compression is already in `s`. This way of splitting into what moves and what
does not ensures the compression doesn't squash the set family, which is proved by
`UV.card_compression`.
* `UV.card_shadow_compression_le`: Compressing reduces the size of the shadow. This is a key fact in
the proof of Kruskal-Katona.
## Notation
`𝓒` (typed with `\MCC`) is notation for `UV.compression` in locale `FinsetFamily`.
## Notes
Even though our emphasis is on `Finset α`, we define UV-compressions more generally in a generalized
boolean algebra, so that one can use it for `Set α`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
compression, UV-compression, shadow
-/
open Finset
variable {α : Type*}
/-- UV-compression is injective on the elements it moves. See `UV.compress`. -/
theorem sup_sdiff_injOn [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (u v : α) :
{ x | Disjoint u x ∧ v ≤ x }.InjOn fun x => (x ⊔ u) \ v := by
rintro a ha b hb hab
have h : ((a ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v = ((b ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v := by
dsimp at hab
rw [hab]
rwa [sdiff_sdiff_comm, ha.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sdiff_comm,
hb.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sup_cancel ha.2, sdiff_sup_cancel hb.2] at h
-- The namespace is here to distinguish from other compressions.
namespace UV
/-! ### UV-compression in generalized boolean algebras -/
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [DecidableRel (@Disjoint α _ _)]
[DecidableLE α] {s : Finset α} {u v a : α}
/-- UV-compressing `a` means removing `v` from it and adding `u` if `a` and `u` are disjoint and
`v ≤ a` (it replaces the `v` part of `a` by the `u` part). Else, UV-compressing `a` doesn't do
anything. This is most useful when `u` and `v` are disjoint finsets of the same size. -/
def compress (u v a : α) : α :=
if Disjoint u a ∧ v ≤ a then (a ⊔ u) \ v else a
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le (hua : Disjoint u a) (hva : v ≤ a) :
compress u v a = (a ⊔ u) \ v :=
if_pos ⟨hua, hva⟩
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le' (hva : Disjoint v a) (hua : u ≤ a) :
compress u v ((a ⊔ v) \ u) = a := by
rw [compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_right
(le_sdiff.2 ⟨(le_sup_right : v ≤ a ⊔ v), hva.mono_right hua⟩),
sdiff_sup_cancel (le_sup_of_le_left hua), hva.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right]
@[simp]
theorem compress_self (u a : α) : compress u u a = a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h
· exact h.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
· rfl
/-- An element can be compressed to any other element by removing/adding the differences. -/
@[simp]
theorem compress_sdiff_sdiff (a b : α) : compress (a \ b) (b \ a) b = a := by
refine (compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_left sdiff_le).trans ?_
rw [sup_sdiff_self_right, sup_sdiff, disjoint_sdiff_self_right.sdiff_eq_left, sup_eq_right]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le
/-- Compressing an element is idempotent. -/
@[simp]
theorem compress_idem (u v a : α) : compress u v (compress u v a) = compress u v a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h h'
· rw [le_sdiff_right.1 h'.2, sdiff_bot, sdiff_bot, sup_assoc, sup_idem]
· rfl
· rfl
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- To UV-compress a set family, we compress each of its elements, except that we don't want to
reduce the cardinality, so we keep all elements whose compression is already present. -/
def compression (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
{a ∈ s | compress u v a ∈ s} ∪ {a ∈ s.image <| compress u v | a ∉ s}
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] notation "𝓒 " => UV.compression
open scoped FinsetFamily
/-- `IsCompressed u v s` expresses that `s` is UV-compressed. -/
def IsCompressed (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
𝓒 u v s = s
/-- UV-compression is injective on the sets that are not UV-compressed. -/
theorem compress_injOn : Set.InjOn (compress u v) ↑{a ∈ s | compress u v a ∉ s} := by
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [mem_coe, mem_filter] at ha hb
rw [compress] at ha hab
split_ifs at ha hab with has
· rw [compress] at hb hab
split_ifs at hb hab with hbs
· exact sup_sdiff_injOn u v has hbs hab
· exact (hb.2 hb.1).elim
· exact (ha.2 ha.1).elim
/-- `a` is in the UV-compressed family iff it's in the original and its compression is in the
original, or it's not in the original but it's the compression of something in the original. -/
theorem mem_compression :
a ∈ 𝓒 u v s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ compress u v a ∈ s ∨ a ∉ s ∧ ∃ b ∈ s, compress u v b = a := by
simp_rw [compression, mem_union, mem_filter, mem_image, and_comm]
protected theorem IsCompressed.eq (h : IsCompressed u v s) : 𝓒 u v s = s := h
@[simp]
theorem compression_self (u : α) (s : Finset α) : 𝓒 u u s = s := by
unfold compression
convert union_empty s
· ext a
rw [mem_filter, compress_self, and_self_iff]
· refine eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun a ha ↦ ?_
simp_rw [mem_filter, mem_image, compress_self] at ha
obtain ⟨⟨b, hb, rfl⟩, hb'⟩ := ha
exact hb' hb
/-- Any family is compressed along two identical elements. -/
theorem isCompressed_self (u : α) (s : Finset α) : IsCompressed u u s := compression_self u s
theorem compress_disjoint :
Disjoint {a ∈ s | compress u v a ∈ s} {a ∈ s.image <| compress u v | a ∉ s} :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha₁ ha₂ ↦ (mem_filter.1 ha₂).2 (mem_filter.1 ha₁).1
theorem compress_mem_compression (ha : a ∈ s) : compress u v a ∈ 𝓒 u v s := by
rw [mem_compression]
by_cases h : compress u v a ∈ s
· rw [compress_idem]
exact Or.inl ⟨h, h⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨h, a, ha, rfl⟩
-- This is a special case of `compress_mem_compression` once we have `compression_idem`.
theorem compress_mem_compression_of_mem_compression (ha : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) :
compress u v a ∈ 𝓒 u v s := by
rw [mem_compression] at ha ⊢
simp only [compress_idem, exists_prop]
obtain ⟨_, ha⟩ | ⟨_, b, hb, rfl⟩ := ha
· exact Or.inl ⟨ha, ha⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨by rwa [compress_idem], b, hb, (compress_idem _ _ _).symm⟩
/-- Compressing a family is idempotent. -/
@[simp]
theorem compression_idem (u v : α) (s : Finset α) : 𝓒 u v (𝓒 u v s) = 𝓒 u v s := by
have h : {a ∈ 𝓒 u v s | compress u v a ∉ 𝓒 u v s} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun a ha h ↦ h <| compress_mem_compression_of_mem_compression ha
rw [compression, filter_image, h, image_empty, ← h]
exact filter_union_filter_neg_eq _ (compression u v s)
/-- Compressing a family doesn't change its size. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_compression (u v : α) (s : Finset α) : #(𝓒 u v s) = #s := by
rw [compression, card_union_of_disjoint compress_disjoint, filter_image,
card_image_of_injOn compress_injOn, ← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_filter_filter_neg s _ _),
filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
theorem le_of_mem_compression_of_not_mem (h : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) (ha : a ∉ s) : u ≤ a := by
rw [mem_compression] at h
obtain h | ⟨-, b, hb, hba⟩ := h
· cases ha h.1
unfold compress at hba
split_ifs at hba with h
| · rw [← hba, le_sdiff]
exact ⟨le_sup_right, h.1.mono_right h.2⟩
· cases ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha hba
theorem disjoint_of_mem_compression_of_not_mem (h : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint v a := by
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/UV.lean | 205 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inl α β)) = lift.{v} #α := by
rw [← lift_id'.{u, v} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInl α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{u, v}]
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inr α β)) = lift.{u} #β := by
rw [← lift_id'.{v, u} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInr α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{v, u}]
theorem two_le_iff : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, nat_succ, succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_one, one_lt_iff_nontrivial, nontrivial_iff]
theorem two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ y : α, y ≠ x := by
rw [two_le_iff, ← nontrivial_iff, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x]
theorem mk_eq_two_iff : #α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ ({x, y} : Set α) = univ := by
classical
simp only [← @Nat.cast_two Cardinal, mk_eq_nat_iff_finset, Finset.card_eq_two]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne, by simpa using ht⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hne, h⟩
exact ⟨{x, y}, by simpa using h, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
theorem mk_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : #α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x := by
rw [mk_eq_two_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, hne, h⟩
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at h
rcases h x with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨b, hne.symm, fun z => (h z).resolve_left⟩, ⟨a, hne, fun z => (h z).resolve_right⟩]
· rintro ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne.symm, eq_univ_of_forall fun z => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (hy z)⟩
theorem exists_not_mem_of_length_lt {α : Type*} (l : List α) (h : ↑l.length < #α) :
∃ z : α, z ∉ l := by
classical
contrapose! h
calc
#α = #(Set.univ : Set α) := mk_univ.symm
_ ≤ #l.toFinset := mk_le_mk_of_subset fun x _ => List.mem_toFinset.mpr (h x)
_ = l.toFinset.card := Cardinal.mk_coe_finset
_ ≤ l.length := Nat.cast_le.mpr (List.toFinset_card_le l)
theorem three_le {α : Type*} (h : 3 ≤ #α) (x : α) (y : α) : ∃ z : α, z ≠ x ∧ z ≠ y := by
have : ↑(3 : ℕ) ≤ #α := by simpa using h
have : ↑(2 : ℕ) < #α := by rwa [← succ_le_iff, ← Cardinal.nat_succ]
have := exists_not_mem_of_length_lt [x, y] this
simpa [not_or] using this
/-! ### `powerlt` operation -/
/-- The function `a ^< b`, defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`. -/
def powerlt (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
⨆ c : Iio b, a ^ (c : Cardinal)
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:80 " ^< " => powerlt
theorem le_powerlt {b c : Cardinal.{u}} (a) (h : c < b) : (a^c) ≤ a ^< b := by
refine le_ciSup (f := fun y : Iio b => a ^ (y : Cardinal)) ?_ ⟨c, h⟩
rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le {a b c : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^< b ≤ c ↔ ∀ x < b, a ^ x ≤ c := by
rw [powerlt, ciSup_le_iff']
· simp
· rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
powerlt_le.2 fun _ hx => le_powerlt a <| hx.trans_le h
theorem powerlt_mono_left (a) : Monotone fun c => a ^< c := fun _ _ => powerlt_le_powerlt_left
theorem powerlt_succ {a b : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^< succ b = a ^ b :=
(powerlt_le.2 fun _ h' => power_le_power_left h <| le_of_lt_succ h').antisymm <|
le_powerlt a (lt_succ b)
theorem powerlt_min {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< min b c = min (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_min
theorem powerlt_max {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< max b c = max (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_max
theorem zero_powerlt {a : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 := by
apply (powerlt_le.2 fun c _ => zero_power_le _).antisymm
rw [← power_zero]
exact le_powerlt 0 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem powerlt_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 := by
convert Cardinal.iSup_of_empty _
exact Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun x => mem_Iio.not.mpr (Cardinal.zero_le x).not_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 2,229 | 2,230 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Defs
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Sub
/-!
# Basic theorems about ℒp space
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology ComplexConjugate
variable {α ε ε' E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [ENorm ε] [ENorm ε']
namespace MeasureTheory
section Lp
section Top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ :=
hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_lt_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_ne_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hq0_lt : 0 < q)
(hfq : eLpNorm' f q μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ q ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_rpow_enorm_eq_rpow_eLpNorm' hq0_lt]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hq0_lt) (ne_of_lt hfq)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top' :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hfp : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ := by
apply lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
· exact ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
· simpa [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using hfp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ ↔ ∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖ₑ) ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ :=
⟨lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, by
intro h
have hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
have : 0 < 1 / p.toReal := div_pos zero_lt_one hp'
simpa [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt this) (ne_of_lt h)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-04")] alias
eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top := eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top
end Top
section Zero
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 μ = 1 := by
rw [eLpNorm', div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f 0 μ = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm]
@[simp]
theorem memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} :
MemLp f 0 μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by simp [MemLp, eLpNorm_exponent_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable := memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
section ENormedAddMonoid
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ENormedAddMonoid ε]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero (hp0_lt : 0 < q) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, hp0_lt]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 q with hq0 | hq_neg
· exact eLpNorm'_zero (lt_of_le_of_ne hq0 hq0_ne.symm)
· simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, hq_neg]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_zero : eLpNormEssSup (0 : α → ε) μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup, ← bot_eq_zero', essSup_const_bot]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero : eLpNorm (0 : α → ε) p μ = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp only [h_top, eLpNorm_exponent_top, eLpNormEssSup_zero]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero' : eLpNorm (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ = 0 := eLpNorm_zero
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero : MemLp (0 : α → ε) p μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero, by rw [eLpNorm_zero]; exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero' : MemLp (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.zero' := MemLp.zero'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_memℒp := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_mem_ℒp := MemLp.zero'
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_pos {f : α → ε} (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_pos]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 (0 : Measure α) = 1 := by
simp [eLpNorm']
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_neg {f : α → ε} (hq_neg : q < 0) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = ∞ := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_neg]
end ENormedAddMonoid
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNormEssSup f (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f p (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm', ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
section ContinuousENorm
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ContinuousENorm ε]
@[simp] lemma memLp_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : MemLp f p (0 : Measure α) := by
simp [MemLp]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_measure_zero := memLp_measure_zero
end ContinuousENorm
end Zero
section Neg
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_neg (f : α → F) (q : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm' (-f) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_neg (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm (-f) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top]
lemma eLpNorm_sub_comm (f g : α → E) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
eLpNorm (f - g) p μ = eLpNorm (g - f) p μ := by simp [← eLpNorm_neg (f := f - g)]
theorem MemLp.neg {f : α → E} (hf : MemLp f p μ) : MemLp (-f) p μ :=
⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.neg hf.1, by simp [hf.right]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.neg := MemLp.neg
theorem memLp_neg_iff {f : α → E} : MemLp (-f) p μ ↔ MemLp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, MemLp.neg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_neg_iff := memLp_neg_iff
end Neg
section Const
variable {ε' ε'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε'] [ContinuousENorm ε']
[TopologicalSpace ε''] [ENormedAddMonoid ε'']
theorem eLpNorm'_const (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q)]
congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hq_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hq_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ (ne_of_lt hq_pos).symm]
-- Generalising this to ENormedAddMonoid requires a case analysis whether ‖c‖ₑ = ⊤,
-- and will happen in a future PR.
theorem eLpNorm'_const' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : F) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hq_ne_zero : q ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top _ (measure_ne_top μ Set.univ)]
· congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hp_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hp_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ hq_ne_zero]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, not_or, not_and_or, not_and_or]
simp [hc_ne_zero]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_const (c : ε) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNormEssSup (fun _ : α => c) μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by
rw [eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm, essSup_const _ hμ]
theorem eLpNorm'_const_of_isProbabilityMeasure (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by simp [eLpNorm'_const c hq_pos, measure_univ]
theorem eLpNorm_const (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_const c hμ]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
theorem eLpNorm_const' (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (h_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
-- NB. If ‖c‖ₑ = ∞ and μ is finite, this claim is false: the right has side is true,
-- but the left hand side is false (as the norm is infinite).
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm {c : ε''} (hc' : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ∞)
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
have hp : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp only [hμ, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, or_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top,
eLpNorm_measure_zero]
by_cases hc : c = 0
· simp only [hc, true_or, eq_self_iff_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top, eLpNorm_zero']
rw [eLpNorm_const' c hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
obtain hμ_top | hμ_ne_top := eq_or_ne (μ .univ) ∞
· simp [hc, hμ_top, hp]
rw [ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
simpa [hμ, hc, hμ_ne_top, hμ_ne_top.lt_top, hc, hc'.lt_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.mpr hp.le) hμ_ne_top
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ :=
eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm enorm_ne_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
theorem memLp_const_enorm {c : ε'} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ := by
refine ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp [hμ]
rw [eLpNorm_const c h0 hμ]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc.lt_top (ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by simp)
(measure_ne_top μ Set.univ))
theorem memLp_const (c : E) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : MemLp (fun _ : α => c) p μ :=
memLp_const_enorm enorm_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_const := memLp_const
theorem memLp_top_const_enorm {c : ε'} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) ∞ μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, by by_cases h : μ = 0 <;> simp [eLpNorm_const _, h, hc.lt_top]⟩
theorem memLp_top_const (c : E) : MemLp (fun _ : α => c) ∞ μ :=
memLp_top_const_enorm enorm_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_top_const := memLp_top_const
theorem memLp_const_iff_enorm
{p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : ε''} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
simp_all [MemLp, aestronglyMeasurable_const,
eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm hc hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
theorem memLp_const_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : E} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
MemLp (fun _ : α => c) p μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ :=
| memLp_const_iff_enorm enorm_ne_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/Basic.lean | 308 | 309 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Eric Wieser, Jeremy Avigad, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Invertible
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.PosDef
/-! # 2×2 block matrices and the Schur complement
This file proves properties of 2×2 block matrices `[A B; C D]` that relate to the Schur complement
`D - C*A⁻¹*B`.
Some of the results here generalize to 2×2 matrices in a category, rather than just a ring. A few
results in this direction can be found in the file `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Biproducts`,
especially the declarations `CategoryTheory.Biprod.gaussian` and `CategoryTheory.Biprod.isoElim`.
Compare with `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible`.
## Main results
* `Matrix.det_fromBlocks₁₁`, `Matrix.det_fromBlocks₂₂`: determinant of a block matrix in terms of
the Schur complement.
* `Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_eq`, `Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_eq`: the inverse of a
block triangular matrix.
* `Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₂₁`, `Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₁₂`: invertibility of a
block triangular matrix.
* `Matrix.det_one_add_mul_comm`: the **Weinstein–Aronszajn identity**.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef.fromBlocks₁₁` and `Matrix.PosSemidef.fromBlocks₂₂`: If a matrix `A` is
positive definite, then `[A B; Bᴴ D]` is positive semidefinite if and only if `D - Bᴴ A⁻¹ B` is
positive semidefinite.
-/
variable {l m n α : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open scoped Matrix
section CommRing
variable [Fintype l] [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommRing α]
/-- LDU decomposition of a block matrix with an invertible top-left corner, using the
Schur complement. -/
theorem fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix l m α)
(D : Matrix l n α) [Invertible A] :
fromBlocks A B C D =
fromBlocks 1 0 (C * ⅟ A) 1 * fromBlocks A 0 0 (D - C * ⅟ A * B) *
fromBlocks 1 (⅟ A * B) 0 1 := by
simp only [fromBlocks_multiply, Matrix.mul_zero, Matrix.zero_mul, add_zero, zero_add,
Matrix.one_mul, Matrix.mul_one, invOf_mul_self, Matrix.mul_invOf_cancel_left,
Matrix.invOf_mul_cancel_right, Matrix.mul_assoc, add_sub_cancel]
/-- LDU decomposition of a block matrix with an invertible bottom-right corner, using the
Schur complement. -/
theorem fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix l n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] :
fromBlocks A B C D =
fromBlocks 1 (B * ⅟ D) 0 1 * fromBlocks (A - B * ⅟ D * C) 0 0 D *
fromBlocks 1 0 (⅟ D * C) 1 :=
(Matrix.reindex (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _)).injective <| by
simpa [reindex_apply, Equiv.sumComm_symm, ← submatrix_mul_equiv _ _ _ (Equiv.sumComm n m), ←
submatrix_mul_equiv _ _ _ (Equiv.sumComm n l), Equiv.sumComm_apply,
fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap] using fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ D C B A
section Triangular
/-! #### Block triangular matrices -/
/-- An upper-block-triangular matrix is invertible if its diagonal is. -/
def fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] : Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D) :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _ (fromBlocks (⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ D)) 0 (⅟ D)) <| by
simp_rw [fromBlocks_multiply, Matrix.mul_zero, Matrix.zero_mul, zero_add, add_zero,
Matrix.neg_mul, invOf_mul_self, Matrix.invOf_mul_cancel_right, add_neg_cancel,
fromBlocks_one]
/-- A lower-block-triangular matrix is invertible if its diagonal is. -/
def fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] : Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D) :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _
(fromBlocks (⅟ A) 0 (-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ A))
(⅟ D)) <| by -- a symmetry argument is more work than just copying the proof
simp_rw [fromBlocks_multiply, Matrix.mul_zero, Matrix.zero_mul, zero_add, add_zero,
Matrix.neg_mul, invOf_mul_self, Matrix.invOf_mul_cancel_right, neg_add_cancel,
fromBlocks_one]
theorem invOf_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] [Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D) = fromBlocks (⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ D)) 0 (⅟ D) := by
letI := fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D) = _)
theorem invOf_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] [Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D) = fromBlocks (⅟ A) 0 (-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ A)) (⅟ D) := by
letI := fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D) = _)
/-- Both diagonal entries of an invertible upper-block-triangular matrix are invertible (by reading
off the diagonal entries of the inverse). -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D)] : Invertible A × Invertible D where
fst :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)).toBlocks₁₁ <| by
have := invOf_mul_self (fromBlocks A B 0 D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₁₁ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₁, Matrix.mul_zero, add_zero, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
snd :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)).toBlocks₂₂ <| by
have := mul_invOf_self (fromBlocks A B 0 D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₂₂ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₂, Matrix.zero_mul, zero_add, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
/-- Both diagonal entries of an invertible lower-block-triangular matrix are invertible (by reading
off the diagonal entries of the inverse). -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D)] : Invertible A × Invertible D where
fst :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)).toBlocks₁₁ <| by
have := mul_invOf_self (fromBlocks A 0 C D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₁₁ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₁, Matrix.zero_mul, add_zero, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
snd :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)).toBlocks₂₂ <| by
have := invOf_mul_self (fromBlocks A 0 C D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₂₂ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₂, Matrix.mul_zero, zero_add, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
/-- `invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible` form
an equivalence. -/
def fromBlocksZero₂₁InvertibleEquiv (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α) :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D) ≃ Invertible A × Invertible D where
toFun _ := invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
invFun i := by
letI := i.1
letI := i.2
exact fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- `invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible` form
an equivalence. -/
def fromBlocksZero₁₂InvertibleEquiv (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α) :
Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D) ≃ Invertible A × Invertible D where
toFun _ := invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
invFun i := by
letI := i.1
letI := i.2
exact fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- An upper block-triangular matrix is invertible iff both elements of its diagonal are.
This is a propositional form of `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₂₁InvertibleEquiv`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₂₁ {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α} {D : Matrix n n α} :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A B 0 D) ↔ IsUnit A ∧ IsUnit D := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, ← nonempty_prod,
(fromBlocksZero₂₁InvertibleEquiv _ _ _).nonempty_congr]
/-- A lower block-triangular matrix is invertible iff both elements of its diagonal are.
This is a propositional form of `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₁₂InvertibleEquiv` forms an `iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₁₂ {A : Matrix m m α} {C : Matrix n m α} {D : Matrix n n α} :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A 0 C D) ↔ IsUnit A ∧ IsUnit D := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, ← nonempty_prod,
(fromBlocksZero₁₂InvertibleEquiv _ _ _).nonempty_congr]
/-- An expression for the inverse of an upper block-triangular matrix, when either both elements of
diagonal are invertible, or both are not. -/
theorem inv_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_of_isUnit_iff (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
(hAD : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit D) :
(fromBlocks A B 0 D)⁻¹ = fromBlocks A⁻¹ (-(A⁻¹ * B * D⁻¹)) 0 D⁻¹ := by
by_cases hA : IsUnit A
· have hD := hAD.mp hA
cases hA.nonempty_invertible
cases hD.nonempty_invertible
letI := fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
simp_rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_eq]
· have hD := hAD.not.mp hA
have : ¬IsUnit (fromBlocks A B 0 D) :=
isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₂₁.not.mpr (not_and'.mpr fun _ => hA)
simp_rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hA, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hD,
Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this, Matrix.zero_mul, neg_zero, fromBlocks_zero]
/-- An expression for the inverse of a lower block-triangular matrix, when either both elements of
diagonal are invertible, or both are not. -/
theorem inv_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_of_isUnit_iff (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
(hAD : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit D) :
(fromBlocks A 0 C D)⁻¹ = fromBlocks A⁻¹ 0 (-(D⁻¹ * C * A⁻¹)) D⁻¹ := by
by_cases hA : IsUnit A
· have hD := hAD.mp hA
cases hA.nonempty_invertible
cases hD.nonempty_invertible
letI := fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
simp_rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_eq]
· have hD := hAD.not.mp hA
have : ¬IsUnit (fromBlocks A 0 C D) :=
isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₁₂.not.mpr (not_and'.mpr fun _ => hA)
simp_rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hA, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hD,
Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this, Matrix.zero_mul, neg_zero, fromBlocks_zero]
end Triangular
/-! ### 2×2 block matrices -/
section Block
/-! #### General 2×2 block matrices -/
/-- A block matrix is invertible if the bottom right corner and the corresponding schur complement
is. -/
def fromBlocks₂₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] [Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C)] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) := by
-- factor `fromBlocks` via `fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂`, and state the inverse we expect
convert Invertible.copy' _ _ (fromBlocks (⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C)) (-(⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D))
(-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C))) (⅟ D + ⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D))
(fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ _ _ _ _) _
· -- the product is invertible because all the factors are
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix n n α) := invertibleOne
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix m m α) := invertibleOne
refine Invertible.mul ?_ (fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible _ _ _)
exact
Invertible.mul (fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible _ _ _)
(fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible _ _ _)
· -- unfold the `Invertible` instances to get the raw factors
show
_ =
fromBlocks 1 0 (-(1 * (⅟ D * C) * 1)) 1 *
(fromBlocks (⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C)) (-(⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * 0 * ⅟ D)) 0 (⅟ D) *
fromBlocks 1 (-(1 * (B * ⅟ D) * 1)) 0 1)
-- combine into a single block matrix
simp only [fromBlocks_multiply, invOf_one, Matrix.one_mul, Matrix.mul_one, Matrix.zero_mul,
Matrix.mul_zero, add_zero, zero_add, neg_zero, Matrix.mul_neg, Matrix.neg_mul, neg_neg, ←
Matrix.mul_assoc, add_comm (⅟D)]
/-- A block matrix is invertible if the top left corner and the corresponding schur complement
is. -/
def fromBlocks₁₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] [Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B)] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) := by
-- we argue by symmetry
letI := fromBlocks₂₂Invertible D C B A
letI iDCBA :=
submatrixEquivInvertible (fromBlocks D C B A) (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _)
exact
iDCBA.copy' _
(fromBlocks (⅟ A + ⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)))
(-(⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A)) (⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)))
(fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap _ _ _ _).symm
(fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap _ _ _ _).symm
theorem invOf_fromBlocks₂₂_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] [Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C)]
[Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) =
fromBlocks (⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C)) (-(⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D))
(-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C))) (⅟ D + ⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D) := by
letI := fromBlocks₂₂Invertible A B C D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) = _)
theorem invOf_fromBlocks₁₁_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] [Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B)]
[Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) =
fromBlocks (⅟ A + ⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)))
(-(⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A)) (⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)) := by
letI := fromBlocks₁₁Invertible A B C D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) = _)
/-- If a block matrix is invertible and so is its bottom left element, then so is the corresponding
Schur complement. -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] [Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C) := by
suffices Invertible (fromBlocks (A - B * ⅟ D * C) 0 0 D) by
exact (invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C) 0 D).1
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix n n α) := invertibleOne
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix m m α) := invertibleOne
letI iDC : Invertible (fromBlocks 1 0 (⅟ D * C) 1 : Matrix (m ⊕ n) (m ⊕ n) α) :=
fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible _ _ _
letI iBD : Invertible (fromBlocks 1 (B * ⅟ D) 0 1 : Matrix (m ⊕ n) (m ⊕ n) α) :=
fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible _ _ _
letI iBDC := Invertible.copy ‹_› _ (fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ A B C D).symm
refine (iBD.mulLeft _).symm ?_
exact (iDC.mulRight _).symm iBDC
/-- If a block matrix is invertible and so is its bottom left element, then so is the corresponding
Schur complement. -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] [Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B) := by
-- another symmetry argument
letI iABCD' :=
submatrixEquivInvertible (fromBlocks A B C D) (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _)
letI iDCBA := iABCD'.copy _ (fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap _ _ _ _).symm
exact invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible D C B A
/-- `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocks₂₂Invertible` as an
equivalence. -/
def invertibleEquivFromBlocks₂₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) ≃ Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C) where
toFun _iABCD := invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible _ _ _ _
invFun _i_schur := fromBlocks₂₂Invertible _ _ _ _
left_inv _iABCD := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _i_schur := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocks₁₁Invertible` as an
equivalence. -/
def invertibleEquivFromBlocks₁₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) ≃ Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B) where
toFun _iABCD := invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible _ _ _ _
invFun _i_schur := fromBlocks₁₁Invertible _ _ _ _
left_inv _iABCD := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _i_schur := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- If the bottom-left element of a block matrix is invertible, then the whole matrix is invertible
iff the corresponding schur complement is. -/
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_iff_of_invertible₂₂ {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α}
{C : Matrix n m α} {D : Matrix n n α} [Invertible D] :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A B C D) ↔ IsUnit (A - B * ⅟ D * C) := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(invertibleEquivFromBlocks₂₂Invertible A B C D).nonempty_congr]
/-- If the top-right element of a block matrix is invertible, then the whole matrix is invertible
iff the corresponding schur complement is. -/
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_iff_of_invertible₁₁ {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α}
{C : Matrix n m α} {D : Matrix n n α} [Invertible A] :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A B C D) ↔ IsUnit (D - C * ⅟ A * B) := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(invertibleEquivFromBlocks₁₁Invertible A B C D).nonempty_congr]
end Block
/-! ### Lemmas about `Matrix.det` -/
section Det
/-- Determinant of a 2×2 block matrix, expanded around an invertible top left element in terms of
the Schur complement. -/
theorem det_fromBlocks₁₁ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B C D).det = det A * det (D - C * ⅟ A * B) := by
rw [fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ (A := A), det_mul, det_mul, det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁,
det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁, det_fromBlocks_zero₁₂, det_one, det_one, one_mul, one_mul, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem det_fromBlocks_one₁₁ (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α) :
(Matrix.fromBlocks 1 B C D).det = det (D - C * B) := by
haveI : Invertible (1 : Matrix m m α) := invertibleOne
rw [det_fromBlocks₁₁, invOf_one, Matrix.mul_one, det_one, one_mul]
/-- Determinant of a 2×2 block matrix, expanded around an invertible bottom right element in terms
of the Schur complement. -/
theorem det_fromBlocks₂₂ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B C D).det = det D * det (A - B * ⅟ D * C) := by
have : fromBlocks A B C D =
(fromBlocks D C B A).submatrix (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _) := by
ext (i j)
cases i <;> cases j <;> rfl
rw [this, det_submatrix_equiv_self, det_fromBlocks₁₁]
@[simp]
theorem det_fromBlocks_one₂₂ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α) :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B C 1).det = det (A - B * C) := by
haveI : Invertible (1 : Matrix n n α) := invertibleOne
rw [det_fromBlocks₂₂, invOf_one, Matrix.mul_one, det_one, one_mul]
/-- The **Weinstein–Aronszajn identity**. Note the `1` on the LHS is of shape m×m, while the `1` on
the RHS is of shape n×n. -/
theorem det_one_add_mul_comm (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) :
det (1 + A * B) = det (1 + B * A) :=
calc
det (1 + A * B) = det (fromBlocks 1 (-A) B 1) := by
rw [det_fromBlocks_one₂₂, Matrix.neg_mul, sub_neg_eq_add]
_ = det (1 + B * A) := by rw [det_fromBlocks_one₁₁, Matrix.mul_neg, sub_neg_eq_add]
/-- Alternate statement of the **Weinstein–Aronszajn identity** -/
theorem det_mul_add_one_comm (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) :
det (A * B + 1) = det (B * A + 1) := by rw [add_comm, det_one_add_mul_comm, add_comm]
theorem det_one_sub_mul_comm (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) :
det (1 - A * B) = det (1 - B * A) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← Matrix.neg_mul, det_one_add_mul_comm, Matrix.mul_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
/-- A special case of the **Matrix determinant lemma** for when `A = I`. -/
theorem det_one_add_replicateCol_mul_replicateRow {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] (u v : m → α) :
det (1 + replicateCol ι u * replicateRow ι v) = 1 + v ⬝ᵥ u := by
rw [det_one_add_mul_comm, det_unique, Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, Matrix.one_apply_eq,
Matrix.replicateRow_mul_replicateCol_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias
det_one_add_col_mul_row := det_one_add_replicateCol_mul_replicateRow
/-- The **Matrix determinant lemma**
TODO: show the more general version without `hA : IsUnit A.det` as
`(A + replicateCol u * replicateRow v).det = A.det + v ⬝ᵥ (adjugate A) *ᵥ u`.
-/
theorem det_add_replicateCol_mul_replicateRow {ι : Type*} [Unique ι]
{A : Matrix m m α} (hA : IsUnit A.det) (u v : m → α) :
(A + replicateCol ι u * replicateRow ι v).det =
A.det * (1 + replicateRow ι v * A⁻¹ * replicateCol ι u).det := by
nth_rewrite 1 [← Matrix.mul_one A]
rwa [← Matrix.mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A (replicateCol ι u * replicateRow ι v),
← Matrix.mul_add, det_mul, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_one_add_mul_comm, ← Matrix.mul_assoc]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias
det_add_col_mul_row := det_add_replicateCol_mul_replicateRow
/-- A generalization of the **Matrix determinant lemma** -/
theorem det_add_mul {A : Matrix m m α} (U : Matrix m n α)
(V : Matrix n m α) (hA : IsUnit A.det) :
(A + U * V).det = A.det * (1 + V * A⁻¹ * U).det := by
nth_rewrite 1 [← Matrix.mul_one A]
rwa [← Matrix.mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A (U * V), ← Matrix.mul_add,
det_mul, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_one_add_mul_comm, ← Matrix.mul_assoc]
| end Det
end CommRing
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/SchurComplement.lean | 444 | 447 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Reverse
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.SMul
/-!
# Theory of monic polynomials
We give several tools for proving that polynomials are monic, e.g.
`Monic.mul`, `Monic.map`, `Monic.pow`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ} {ι : Type y}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton : Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ Subsingleton R :=
subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
theorem not_monic_zero_iff : ¬Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (0 : R) ≠ 1 :=
(monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one.symm).not
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton' :
Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ∧ ∀ a b : R, a = b :=
Polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans
⟨by
intro
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton], fun h => subsingleton_iff.mpr h.2⟩
theorem Monic.as_sum (hp : p.Monic) :
p = X ^ p.natDegree + ∑ i ∈ range p.natDegree, C (p.coeff i) * X ^ i := by
conv_lhs => rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ_comm]
suffices C (p.coeff p.natDegree) = 1 by rw [this, one_mul]
exact congr_arg C hp
theorem ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : Monic q) : q ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_zero] at hq
rw [← mul_one p, ← C_1, ← hq, C_0, mul_zero] at hp
exact hp rfl
theorem Monic.map [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : Monic p) : Monic (p.map f) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
have : f p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
rw [show _ = _ from hp, f.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, coeff_map]
suffices p.coeff (p.map f).natDegree = 1 by simp [this]
rwa [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f this)]
theorem monic_C_mul_of_mul_leadingCoeff_eq_one {b : R} (hp : b * p.leadingCoeff = 1) :
Monic (C b * p) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
theorem monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one {b : R} (hp : p.leadingCoeff * b = 1) :
Monic (p * C b) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
theorem monic_of_degree_le (n : ℕ) (H1 : degree p ≤ n) (H2 : coeff p n = 1) : Monic p :=
Decidable.byCases
(fun H : degree p < n => eq_of_zero_eq_one (H2 ▸ (coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H).symm) _ _)
fun H : ¬degree p < n => by
rwa [Monic, Polynomial.leadingCoeff, natDegree, (lt_or_eq_of_le H1).resolve_left H]
theorem monic_X_pow_add {n : ℕ} (H : degree p < n) : Monic (X ^ n + p) :=
monic_of_degree_le n
(le_trans (degree_add_le _ _) (max_le (degree_X_pow_le _) (le_of_lt H)))
(by rw [coeff_add, coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H, add_zero])
variable (a) in
theorem monic_X_pow_add_C {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (X ^ n + C a).Monic :=
monic_X_pow_add <| (lt_of_le_of_lt degree_C_le
(by simp only [Nat.cast_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, ne_eq, h, not_false_eq_true]))
theorem monic_X_add_C (x : R) : Monic (X + C x) :=
pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ monic_X_pow_add_C x one_ne_zero
theorem Monic.mul (hp : Monic p) (hq : Monic q) : Monic (p * q) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : (0 : R) = 1 then
haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h0
Subsingleton.elim _ _
else by
have : p.leadingCoeff * q.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
simp [Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, Ne.symm h0]
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul' this, Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, one_mul]
theorem Monic.pow (hp : Monic p) : ∀ n : ℕ, Monic (p ^ n)
| 0 => monic_one
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact (Monic.pow hp n).mul hp
theorem Monic.add_of_left (hp : Monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, add_comm, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
theorem Monic.add_of_right (hq : Monic q) (hpq : degree p < degree q) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_left (hp : p.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : q.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_monic_mul hp]
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_right (hq : q.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : p.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_mul_monic hq]
namespace Monic
lemma comp (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) (h : q.natDegree ≠ 0) : (p.comp q).Monic := by
nontriviality R
have : (p.comp q).natDegree = p.natDegree * q.natDegree :=
natDegree_comp_eq_of_mul_ne_zero <| by simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff]
rw [Monic.def, Polynomial.leadingCoeff, this, coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree h, hp.leadingCoeff,
hq.leadingCoeff, one_pow, mul_one]
lemma comp_X_add_C (hp : p.Monic) (r : R) : (p.comp (X + C r)).Monic := by
nontriviality R
refine hp.comp (monic_X_add_C _) fun ha ↦ ?_
rw [natDegree_X_add_C] at ha
exact one_ne_zero ha
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
constructor <;> intro h
swap
· rw [h]
exact natDegree_one
have : p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
rw [← Polynomial.degree_le_zero_iff]
rwa [Polynomial.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero] at h
rw [this]
rw [← h, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff, Monic.def.1 hp, C_1]
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.degree ≤ 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
rw [← hp.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one, natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero]
theorem natDegree_mul (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
nontriviality R
apply natDegree_mul'
simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff]
theorem degree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).degree = (q * p).degree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [degree_mul', hp.degree_mul]
· exact add_comm _ _
· rwa [hp.leadingCoeff, one_mul, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
nonrec theorem natDegree_mul' (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_mul']
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
theorem natDegree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).natDegree = (q * p).natDegree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' h, Polynomial.natDegree_mul', add_comm]
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
theorem not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
¬p ∣ q := by
rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' <| right_ne_zero_of_mul h0] at hl
exact hl.not_le (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
theorem not_dvd_of_degree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : degree q < degree p) : ¬p ∣ q :=
Monic.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt hp h0 <| natDegree_lt_natDegree h0 hl
theorem nextCoeff_mul (hp : Monic p) (hq : Monic q) :
nextCoeff (p * q) = nextCoeff p + nextCoeff q := by
nontriviality
simp only [← coeff_one_reverse]
rw [reverse_mul] <;> simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff, mul_coeff_one, add_comm]
theorem nextCoeff_pow (hp : p.Monic) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).nextCoeff = n • p.nextCoeff := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, zero_smul, ← map_one (f := C), nextCoeff_C_eq_zero]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, (hp.pow n).nextCoeff_mul hp, ih, succ_nsmul]
theorem eq_one_of_map_eq_one {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : p.Monic)
(map_eq : p.map f = 1) : p = 1 := by
nontriviality R
have hdeg : p.degree = 0 := by
rw [← degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f _, map_eq, degree_one]
· rw [hp.leadingCoeff, f.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
have hndeg : p.natDegree = 0 :=
WithBot.coe_eq_coe.mp ((degree_eq_natDegree hp.ne_zero).symm.trans hdeg)
convert eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero hdeg
rw [← hndeg, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff, hp.leadingCoeff, C.map_one]
theorem natDegree_pow (hp : p.Monic) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).natDegree = n * p.natDegree := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, (hp.pow n).natDegree_mul hp, hn, Nat.succ_mul, add_comm]
end Monic
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_pow_X_add_C [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) (r : R) : ((X + C r) ^ n).natDegree = n := by
rw [(monic_X_add_C r).natDegree_pow, natDegree_X_add_C, mul_one]
theorem Monic.eq_one_of_isUnit (hm : Monic p) (hpu : IsUnit p) : p = 1 := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨q, h⟩ := hpu.exists_right_inv
have := hm.natDegree_mul' (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h)
rw [h, natDegree_one, eq_comm, add_eq_zero] at this
exact hm.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one.mp this.1
theorem Monic.isUnit_iff (hm : p.Monic) : IsUnit p ↔ p = 1 :=
⟨hm.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun h => h.symm ▸ isUnit_one⟩
theorem eq_of_monic_of_associated (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) (hpq : Associated p q) : p = q := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := hpq
rw [(hp.of_mul_monic_left hq).eq_one_of_isUnit u.isUnit, mul_one]
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem monic_multiset_prod_of_monic (t : Multiset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (ht : ∀ i ∈ t, Monic (f i)) :
| Monic (t.map f).prod := by
revert ht
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Monic.lean | 250 | 251 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inl α β)) = lift.{v} #α := by
rw [← lift_id'.{u, v} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInl α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{u, v}]
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inr α β)) = lift.{u} #β := by
rw [← lift_id'.{v, u} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInr α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{v, u}]
theorem two_le_iff : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, nat_succ, succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_one, one_lt_iff_nontrivial, nontrivial_iff]
theorem two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ y : α, y ≠ x := by
rw [two_le_iff, ← nontrivial_iff, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x]
theorem mk_eq_two_iff : #α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ ({x, y} : Set α) = univ := by
classical
simp only [← @Nat.cast_two Cardinal, mk_eq_nat_iff_finset, Finset.card_eq_two]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne, by simpa using ht⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hne, h⟩
exact ⟨{x, y}, by simpa using h, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
theorem mk_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : #α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x := by
rw [mk_eq_two_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, hne, h⟩
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at h
rcases h x with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨b, hne.symm, fun z => (h z).resolve_left⟩, ⟨a, hne, fun z => (h z).resolve_right⟩]
· rintro ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne.symm, eq_univ_of_forall fun z => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (hy z)⟩
theorem exists_not_mem_of_length_lt {α : Type*} (l : List α) (h : ↑l.length < #α) :
∃ z : α, z ∉ l := by
classical
contrapose! h
calc
#α = #(Set.univ : Set α) := mk_univ.symm
_ ≤ #l.toFinset := mk_le_mk_of_subset fun x _ => List.mem_toFinset.mpr (h x)
_ = l.toFinset.card := Cardinal.mk_coe_finset
_ ≤ l.length := Nat.cast_le.mpr (List.toFinset_card_le l)
theorem three_le {α : Type*} (h : 3 ≤ #α) (x : α) (y : α) : ∃ z : α, z ≠ x ∧ z ≠ y := by
have : ↑(3 : ℕ) ≤ #α := by simpa using h
have : ↑(2 : ℕ) < #α := by rwa [← succ_le_iff, ← Cardinal.nat_succ]
have := exists_not_mem_of_length_lt [x, y] this
simpa [not_or] using this
/-! ### `powerlt` operation -/
/-- The function `a ^< b`, defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`. -/
def powerlt (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
⨆ c : Iio b, a ^ (c : Cardinal)
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:80 " ^< " => powerlt
theorem le_powerlt {b c : Cardinal.{u}} (a) (h : c < b) : (a^c) ≤ a ^< b := by
refine le_ciSup (f := fun y : Iio b => a ^ (y : Cardinal)) ?_ ⟨c, h⟩
rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le {a b c : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^< b ≤ c ↔ ∀ x < b, a ^ x ≤ c := by
rw [powerlt, ciSup_le_iff']
· simp
· rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
powerlt_le.2 fun _ hx => le_powerlt a <| hx.trans_le h
theorem powerlt_mono_left (a) : Monotone fun c => a ^< c := fun _ _ => powerlt_le_powerlt_left
theorem powerlt_succ {a b : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^< succ b = a ^ b :=
(powerlt_le.2 fun _ h' => power_le_power_left h <| le_of_lt_succ h').antisymm <|
le_powerlt a (lt_succ b)
theorem powerlt_min {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< min b c = min (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_min
theorem powerlt_max {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< max b c = max (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_max
theorem zero_powerlt {a : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 := by
apply (powerlt_le.2 fun c _ => zero_power_le _).antisymm
rw [← power_zero]
exact le_powerlt 0 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem powerlt_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 := by
convert Cardinal.iSup_of_empty _
exact Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun x => mem_Iio.not.mpr (Cardinal.zero_le x).not_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 1,503 | 1,506 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 373 | 375 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
/-!
# N-ary images of finsets
This file defines `Finset.image₂`, the binary image of finsets. This is the finset version of
`Set.image2`. This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Set.NAry`, `Order.Filter.NAry` and `Data.Option.NAry`. Please
keep them in sync.
We do not define `Finset.image₃` as its only purpose would be to prove properties of `Finset.image₂`
and `Set.image2` already fulfills this task.
-/
open Function Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable [DecidableEq α'] [DecidableEq β'] [DecidableEq γ] [DecidableEq γ']
[DecidableEq δ'] [DecidableEq ε] [DecidableEq ε'] {f f' : α → β → γ} {g g' : α → β → γ → δ}
{s s' : Finset α} {t t' : Finset β} {u u' : Finset γ} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : γ}
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function `Finset α → Finset β → Finset γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset γ :=
(s ×ˢ t).image <| uncurry f
@[simp]
theorem mem_image₂ : c ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, f a b = c := by
simp [image₂, and_assoc]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(image₂ f s t : Set γ) = Set.image2 f s t :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_image₂
theorem card_image₂_le (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(image₂ f s t) ≤ #s * #t :=
card_image_le.trans_eq <| card_product _ _
theorem card_image₂_iff :
#(image₂ f s t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).InjOn fun x => f x.1 x.2 := by
rw [← card_product, ← coe_product]
exact card_image_iff
theorem card_image₂ (hf : Injective2 f) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(image₂ f s t) = #s * #t :=
(card_image_of_injective _ hf.uncurry).trans <| card_product _ _
theorem mem_image₂_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t :=
mem_image₂.2 ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
theorem mem_image₂_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, mem_image2_iff hf, mem_coe, mem_coe]
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t' := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_image₂, coe_image₂]
exact image2_subset hs ht
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s t' :=
image₂_subset Subset.rfl ht
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t :=
image₂_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem image_subset_image₂_left (hb : b ∈ t) : s.image (fun a => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ ha => mem_image₂_of_mem ha hb
theorem image_subset_image₂_right (ha : a ∈ s) : t.image (fun b => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => mem_image₂_of_mem ha
lemma forall_mem_image₂ {p : γ → Prop} :
(∀ z ∈ image₂ f s t, p z) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by
simp_rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, forall_mem_image2]
lemma exists_mem_image₂ {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ z ∈ image₂ f s t, p z) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by
simp_rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, exists_mem_image2]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias forall_image₂_iff := forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem image₂_subset_iff : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y ∈ u :=
forall_mem_image₂
theorem image₂_subset_iff_left : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, (t.image fun b => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff]
theorem image₂_subset_iff_right : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ b ∈ t, (s.image fun a => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, @forall₂_swap α]
@[simp]
theorem image₂_nonempty_iff : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_image₂]
exact image2_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.image₂ (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_left (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).1
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_right (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).2
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_left : image₂ f ∅ t = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_right : image₂ f s ∅ = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_eq_empty_iff : image₂ f s t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp_rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, image₂_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem image₂_singleton_left : image₂ f {a} t = t.image fun b => f a b :=
ext fun x => by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_singleton_right : image₂ f s {b} = s.image fun a => f a b :=
ext fun x => by simp
theorem image₂_singleton_left' : image₂ f {a} t = t.image (f a) :=
image₂_singleton_left
theorem image₂_singleton : image₂ f {a} {b} = {f a b} := by simp
theorem image₂_union_left [DecidableEq α] : image₂ f (s ∪ s') t = image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_left
theorem image₂_union_right [DecidableEq β] : image₂ f s (t ∪ t') = image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_right
@[simp]
theorem image₂_insert_left [DecidableEq α] :
image₂ f (insert a s) t = (t.image fun b => f a b) ∪ image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem image₂_insert_right [DecidableEq β] :
image₂ f s (insert b t) = (s.image fun a => f a b) ∪ image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_insert_right
theorem image₂_inter_left [DecidableEq α] (hf : Injective2 f) :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') t = image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_left hf
theorem image₂_inter_right [DecidableEq β] (hf : Injective2 f) :
image₂ f s (t ∩ t') = image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_right hf
theorem image₂_inter_subset_left [DecidableEq α] :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') t ⊆ image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_subset_left
theorem image₂_inter_subset_right [DecidableEq β] :
image₂ f s (t ∩ t') ⊆ image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_subset_right
theorem image₂_congr (h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b = f' a b) : image₂ f s t = image₂ f' s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_congr h
/-- A common special case of `image₂_congr` -/
theorem image₂_congr' (h : ∀ a b, f a b = f' a b) : image₂ f s t = image₂ f' s t :=
image₂_congr fun a _ b _ => h a b
variable (s t)
theorem card_image₂_singleton_left (hf : Injective (f a)) : #(image₂ f {a} t) = #t := by
rw [image₂_singleton_left, card_image_of_injective _ hf]
theorem card_image₂_singleton_right (hf : Injective fun a => f a b) :
#(image₂ f s {b}) = #s := by rw [image₂_singleton_right, card_image_of_injective _ hf]
theorem image₂_singleton_inter [DecidableEq β] (t₁ t₂ : Finset β) (hf : Injective (f a)) :
image₂ f {a} (t₁ ∩ t₂) = image₂ f {a} t₁ ∩ image₂ f {a} t₂ := by
simp_rw [image₂_singleton_left, image_inter _ _ hf]
theorem image₂_inter_singleton [DecidableEq α] (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (hf : Injective fun a => f a b) :
image₂ f (s₁ ∩ s₂) {b} = image₂ f s₁ {b} ∩ image₂ f s₂ {b} := by
simp_rw [image₂_singleton_right, image_inter _ _ hf]
theorem card_le_card_image₂_left {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (hf : ∀ a, Injective (f a)) :
#t ≤ #(image₂ f s t) := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
rw [← card_image₂_singleton_left _ (hf a)]
exact card_le_card (image₂_subset_right <| singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)
theorem card_le_card_image₂_right {t : Finset β} (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hf : ∀ b, Injective fun a => f a b) : #s ≤ #(image₂ f s t) := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ht
rw [← card_image₂_singleton_right _ (hf b)]
exact card_le_card (image₂_subset_left <| singleton_subset_iff.2 hb)
variable {s t}
theorem biUnion_image_left : (s.biUnion fun a => t.image <| f a) = image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.iUnion_image_left _
theorem biUnion_image_right : (t.biUnion fun b => s.image fun a => f a b) = image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.iUnion_image_right _
/-!
### Algebraic replacement rules
A collection of lemmas to transfer associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of operations
to the associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of `Finset.image₂` of those operations.
The proof pattern is `image₂_lemma operation_lemma`. For example, `image₂_comm mul_comm` proves that
`image₂ (*) f g = image₂ (*) g f` in a `CommSemigroup`.
-/
section
variable [DecidableEq δ]
theorem image_image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ (fun a b => g (f a b)) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2 _ _
theorem image₂_image_left (f : γ → β → δ) (g : α → γ) :
image₂ f (s.image g) t = image₂ (fun a b => f (g a) b) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_image_left _ _
theorem image₂_image_right (f : α → γ → δ) (g : β → γ) :
image₂ f s (t.image g) = image₂ (fun a b => f a (g b)) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_image_right _ _
@[simp]
theorem image₂_mk_eq_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
image₂ Prod.mk s t = s ×ˢ t := by ext; simp [Prod.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem image₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
image₂ (curry f) s t = (s ×ˢ t).image f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem image_uncurry_product (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry f) = image₂ f s t := rfl
theorem image₂_swap (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
image₂ f s t = image₂ (fun a b => f b a) t s :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_swap _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem image₂_left [DecidableEq α] (h : t.Nonempty) : image₂ (fun x _ => x) s t = s :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_left h
@[simp]
theorem image₂_right [DecidableEq β] (h : s.Nonempty) : image₂ (fun _ y => y) s t = t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_right h
theorem image₂_assoc {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ}
{f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ} {f' : α → ε' → ε}
{g' : β → γ → ε'} (h_assoc : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = f' a (g' b c)) :
image₂ f (image₂ g s t) u = image₂ f' s (image₂ g' t u) :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_assoc h_assoc
theorem image₂_comm {g : β → α → γ} (h_comm : ∀ a b, f a b = g b a) : image₂ f s t = image₂ g t s :=
(image₂_swap _ _ _).trans <| by simp_rw [h_comm]
theorem image₂_left_comm {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {f : α → δ → ε} {g : β → γ → δ}
{f' : α → γ → δ'} {g' : β → δ' → ε} (h_left_comm : ∀ a b c, f a (g b c) = g' b (f' a c)) :
image₂ f s (image₂ g t u) = image₂ g' t (image₂ f' s u) :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_left_comm h_left_comm
theorem image₂_right_comm {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ}
{f' : α → γ → δ'} {g' : δ' → β → ε} (h_right_comm : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = g' (f' a c) b) :
image₂ f (image₂ g s t) u = image₂ g' (image₂ f' s u) t :=
coe_injective <| by
| push_cast
exact image2_right_comm h_right_comm
theorem image₂_image₂_image₂_comm {γ δ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {v : Finset δ} [DecidableEq ζ]
[DecidableEq ζ'] [DecidableEq ν] {f : ε → ζ → ν} {g : α → β → ε} {h : γ → δ → ζ}
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NAry.lean | 327 | 331 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Pi
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
/-!
# Integration with respect to a finite product of measures
On a finite product of measure spaces, we show that a product of integrable functions each
depending on a single coordinate is integrable, in `MeasureTheory.integrable_fintype_prod`, and
that its integral is the product of the individual integrals,
in `MeasureTheory.integral_fintype_prod_eq_prod`.
-/
open Fintype MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Integrable
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedCommRing 𝕜]
/-- On a finite product space in `n` variables, for a natural number `n`, a product of integrable
functions depending on each coordinate is integrable. -/
theorem fin_nat_prod {n : ℕ} {E : Fin n → Type*}
[∀ i, MeasureSpace (E i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (E i))]
{f : (i : Fin n) → E i → 𝕜} (hf : ∀ i, Integrable (f i)) :
Integrable (fun (x : (i : Fin n) → E i) ↦ ∏ i, f i (x i)) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [Finset.univ_eq_empty, Finset.prod_empty, volume_pi, isFiniteMeasure_iff,
integrable_const_iff, one_ne_zero, pi_empty_univ, ENNReal.one_lt_top, or_true]
| succ n n_ih =>
have := ((measurePreserving_piFinSuccAbove (fun i => (volume : Measure (E i))) 0).symm)
rw [volume_pi, ← this.integrable_comp_emb (MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding _)]
simp_rw [MeasurableEquiv.piFinSuccAbove_symm_apply, Fin.insertNthEquiv,
Fin.prod_univ_succ, Fin.insertNth_zero]
simp only [Fin.zero_succAbove, cast_eq, Function.comp_def, Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ]
have : Integrable (fun (x : (j : Fin n) → E (Fin.succ j)) ↦ ∏ j, f (Fin.succ j) (x j)) :=
n_ih (fun i ↦ hf _)
exact Integrable.mul_prod (hf 0) this
/-- On a finite product space, a product of integrable functions depending on each coordinate is
integrable. Version with dependent target. -/
theorem fintype_prod_dep {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {E : ι → Type*}
{f : (i : ι) → E i → 𝕜} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (E i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (E i))]
(hf : ∀ i, Integrable (f i)) :
Integrable (fun (x : (i : ι) → E i) ↦ ∏ i, f i (x i)) := by
let e := (equivFin ι).symm
simp_rw [← (volume_measurePreserving_piCongrLeft _ e).integrable_comp_emb
(MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding _),
← e.prod_comp, MeasurableEquiv.coe_piCongrLeft, Function.comp_def,
Equiv.piCongrLeft_apply_apply]
exact .fin_nat_prod (fun i ↦ hf _)
/-- On a finite product space, a product of integrable functions depending on each coordinate is
integrable. -/
theorem fintype_prod {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {E : Type*}
{f : ι → E → 𝕜} [MeasureSpace E] [SigmaFinite (volume : Measure E)]
(hf : ∀ i, Integrable (f i)) :
Integrable (fun (x : ι → E) ↦ ∏ i, f i (x i)) :=
Integrable.fintype_prod_dep hf
end Integrable
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
/-- A version of **Fubini's theorem** in `n` variables, for a natural number `n`. -/
theorem integral_fin_nat_prod_eq_prod {n : ℕ} {E : Fin n → Type*}
[∀ i, MeasureSpace (E i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (E i))]
(f : (i : Fin n) → E i → 𝕜) :
∫ x : (i : Fin n) → E i, ∏ i, f i (x i) = ∏ i, ∫ x, f i x := by
induction n with
| zero =>
simp [volume_pi, measureReal_def]
| succ n n_ih =>
calc
_ = ∫ x : E 0 × ((i : Fin n) → E (Fin.succ i)),
f 0 x.1 * ∏ i : Fin n, f (Fin.succ i) (x.2 i) := by
rw [volume_pi, ← ((measurePreserving_piFinSuccAbove
(fun i => (volume : Measure (E i))) 0).symm).integral_comp']
simp_rw [MeasurableEquiv.piFinSuccAbove_symm_apply, Fin.insertNthEquiv,
Fin.prod_univ_succ, Fin.insertNth_zero, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Fin.cons_succ, volume_eq_prod,
volume_pi, Fin.zero_succAbove, cast_eq, Fin.cons_zero]
_ = (∫ x, f 0 x) * ∏ i : Fin n, ∫ (x : E (Fin.succ i)), f (Fin.succ i) x := by
rw [← n_ih, ← integral_prod_mul, volume_eq_prod]
_ = ∏ i, ∫ x, f i x := by rw [Fin.prod_univ_succ]
/-- A version of **Fubini's theorem** with the variables indexed by a general finite type. -/
theorem integral_fintype_prod_eq_prod (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] {E : ι → Type*}
(f : (i : ι) → E i → 𝕜) [∀ i, MeasureSpace (E i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (E i))] :
∫ x : (i : ι) → E i, ∏ i, f i (x i) = ∏ i, ∫ x, f i x := by
| let e := (equivFin ι).symm
rw [← (volume_measurePreserving_piCongrLeft _ e).integral_comp']
simp_rw [← e.prod_comp, MeasurableEquiv.coe_piCongrLeft, Equiv.piCongrLeft_apply_apply,
MeasureTheory.integral_fin_nat_prod_eq_prod]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Pi.lean | 95 | 98 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
| · calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 68 | 70 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalComplexLimits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ShortExact
/-! # THe category of homological complexes is abelian
If `C` is an abelian category, then `HomologicalComplex C c` is an abelian
category for any complex shape `c : ComplexShape ι`.
We also obtain that a short complex in `HomologicalComplex C c`
is exact (resp. short exact) iff degreewise it is so.
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {C ι : Type*} {c : ComplexShape ι} [Category C] [Abelian C]
noncomputable instance : IsNormalEpiCategory (HomologicalComplex C c) := ⟨fun p _ =>
⟨NormalEpi.mk _ (kernel.ι p) (kernel.condition _)
(isColimitOfEval _ _ (fun _ =>
Abelian.isColimitMapCoconeOfCokernelCoforkOfπ _ _))⟩⟩
noncomputable instance : IsNormalMonoCategory (HomologicalComplex C c) := ⟨fun p _ =>
⟨NormalMono.mk _ (cokernel.π p) (cokernel.condition _)
(isLimitOfEval _ _ (fun _ =>
Abelian.isLimitMapConeOfKernelForkOfι _ _))⟩⟩
noncomputable instance : Abelian (HomologicalComplex C c) where
variable (S : ShortComplex (HomologicalComplex C c))
| lemma exact_of_degreewise_exact (hS : ∀ (i : ι), (S.map (eval C c i)).Exact) :
S.Exact := by
simp only [ShortComplex.exact_iff_isZero_homology] at hS ⊢
rw [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero]
ext i
apply (IsZero.of_iso (hS i) (S.mapHomologyIso (eval C c i)).symm).eq_of_src
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomologicalComplexAbelian.lean | 40 | 45 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Hall.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Rank
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Projectivization.Constructions
/-!
# Configurations of Points and lines
This file introduces abstract configurations of points and lines, and proves some basic properties.
## Main definitions
* `Configuration.Nondegenerate`: Excludes certain degenerate configurations,
and imposes uniqueness of intersection points.
* `Configuration.HasPoints`: A nondegenerate configuration in which
every pair of lines has an intersection point.
* `Configuration.HasLines`: A nondegenerate configuration in which
every pair of points has a line through them.
* `Configuration.lineCount`: The number of lines through a given point.
* `Configuration.pointCount`: The number of lines through a given line.
## Main statements
* `Configuration.HasLines.card_le`: `HasLines` implies `|P| ≤ |L|`.
* `Configuration.HasPoints.card_le`: `HasPoints` implies `|L| ≤ |P|`.
* `Configuration.HasLines.hasPoints`: `HasLines` and `|P| = |L|` implies `HasPoints`.
* `Configuration.HasPoints.hasLines`: `HasPoints` and `|P| = |L|` implies `HasLines`.
Together, these four statements say that any two of the following properties imply the third:
(a) `HasLines`, (b) `HasPoints`, (c) `|P| = |L|`.
-/
open Finset
namespace Configuration
variable (P L : Type*) [Membership P L]
/-- A type synonym. -/
def Dual :=
P
instance [h : Inhabited P] : Inhabited (Dual P) :=
h
instance [Finite P] : Finite (Dual P) :=
‹Finite P›
instance [h : Fintype P] : Fintype (Dual P) :=
h
set_option synthInstance.checkSynthOrder false in
instance : Membership (Dual L) (Dual P) :=
⟨Function.swap (Membership.mem : L → P → Prop)⟩
/-- A configuration is nondegenerate if:
1) there does not exist a line that passes through all of the points,
2) there does not exist a point that is on all of the lines,
3) there is at most one line through any two points,
4) any two lines have at most one intersection point.
Conditions 3 and 4 are equivalent. -/
class Nondegenerate : Prop where
exists_point : ∀ l : L, ∃ p, p ∉ l
exists_line : ∀ p, ∃ l : L, p ∉ l
eq_or_eq : ∀ {p₁ p₂ : P} {l₁ l₂ : L}, p₁ ∈ l₁ → p₂ ∈ l₁ → p₁ ∈ l₂ → p₂ ∈ l₂ → p₁ = p₂ ∨ l₁ = l₂
/-- A nondegenerate configuration in which every pair of lines has an intersection point. -/
class HasPoints extends Nondegenerate P L where
/-- Intersection of two lines -/
mkPoint : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : L}, l₁ ≠ l₂ → P
mkPoint_ax : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : L} (h : l₁ ≠ l₂), mkPoint h ∈ l₁ ∧ mkPoint h ∈ l₂
/-- A nondegenerate configuration in which every pair of points has a line through them. -/
class HasLines extends Nondegenerate P L where
/-- Line through two points -/
mkLine : ∀ {p₁ p₂ : P}, p₁ ≠ p₂ → L
mkLine_ax : ∀ {p₁ p₂ : P} (h : p₁ ≠ p₂), p₁ ∈ mkLine h ∧ p₂ ∈ mkLine h
open Nondegenerate
open HasPoints (mkPoint mkPoint_ax)
open HasLines (mkLine mkLine_ax)
instance Dual.Nondegenerate [Nondegenerate P L] : Nondegenerate (Dual L) (Dual P) where
exists_point := @exists_line P L _ _
exists_line := @exists_point P L _ _
eq_or_eq := @fun l₁ l₂ p₁ p₂ h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ => (@eq_or_eq P L _ _ p₁ p₂ l₁ l₂ h₁ h₃ h₂ h₄).symm
instance Dual.hasLines [HasPoints P L] : HasLines (Dual L) (Dual P) :=
{ Dual.Nondegenerate _ _ with
mkLine := @mkPoint P L _ _
mkLine_ax := @mkPoint_ax P L _ _ }
instance Dual.hasPoints [HasLines P L] : HasPoints (Dual L) (Dual P) :=
{ Dual.Nondegenerate _ _ with
mkPoint := @mkLine P L _ _
mkPoint_ax := @mkLine_ax P L _ _ }
theorem HasPoints.existsUnique_point [HasPoints P L] (l₁ l₂ : L) (hl : l₁ ≠ l₂) :
∃! p, p ∈ l₁ ∧ p ∈ l₂ :=
⟨mkPoint hl, mkPoint_ax hl, fun _ hp =>
(eq_or_eq hp.1 (mkPoint_ax hl).1 hp.2 (mkPoint_ax hl).2).resolve_right hl⟩
theorem HasLines.existsUnique_line [HasLines P L] (p₁ p₂ : P) (hp : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∃! l : L, p₁ ∈ l ∧ p₂ ∈ l :=
HasPoints.existsUnique_point (Dual L) (Dual P) p₁ p₂ hp
variable {P L}
/-- If a nondegenerate configuration has at least as many points as lines, then there exists
an injective function `f` from lines to points, such that `f l` does not lie on `l`. -/
theorem Nondegenerate.exists_injective_of_card_le [Nondegenerate P L] [Fintype P] [Fintype L]
(h : Fintype.card L ≤ Fintype.card P) : ∃ f : L → P, Function.Injective f ∧ ∀ l, f l ∉ l := by
classical
let t : L → Finset P := fun l => Set.toFinset { p | p ∉ l }
suffices ∀ s : Finset L, #s ≤ (s.biUnion t).card by
-- Hall's marriage theorem
obtain ⟨f, hf1, hf2⟩ := (Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective t).mp this
exact ⟨f, hf1, fun l => Set.mem_toFinset.mp (hf2 l)⟩
intro s
by_cases hs₀ : #s = 0
| -- If `s = ∅`, then `#s = 0 ≤ #(s.bUnion t)`
· simp_rw [hs₀, zero_le]
by_cases hs₁ : #s = 1
-- If `s = {l}`, then pick a point `p ∉ l`
· obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ := Finset.card_eq_one.mp hs₁
obtain ⟨p, hl⟩ := exists_point (P := P) l
rw [Finset.card_singleton, Finset.singleton_biUnion, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
exact Finset.card_ne_zero_of_mem (Set.mem_toFinset.mpr hl)
suffices #(s.biUnion t)ᶜ ≤ #sᶜ by
-- Rephrase in terms of complements (uses `h`)
rw [Finset.card_compl, Finset.card_compl, tsub_le_iff_left] at this
replace := h.trans this
rwa [← add_tsub_assoc_of_le s.card_le_univ, le_tsub_iff_left (le_add_left s.card_le_univ),
add_le_add_iff_right] at this
have hs₂ : #(s.biUnion t)ᶜ ≤ 1 := by
-- At most one line through two points of `s`
refine Finset.card_le_one_iff.mpr @fun p₁ p₂ hp₁ hp₂ => ?_
simp_rw [t, Finset.mem_compl, Finset.mem_biUnion, not_exists, not_and,
Set.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Classical.not_not] at hp₁ hp₂
obtain ⟨l₁, l₂, hl₁, hl₂, hl₃⟩ :=
Finset.one_lt_card_iff.mp (Nat.one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨hs₀, hs₁⟩)
exact (eq_or_eq (hp₁ l₁ hl₁) (hp₂ l₁ hl₁) (hp₁ l₂ hl₂) (hp₂ l₂ hl₂)).resolve_right hl₃
by_cases hs₃ : #sᶜ = 0
· rw [hs₃, Nat.le_zero]
rw [Finset.card_compl, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, LE.le.le_iff_eq (Finset.card_le_univ _), eq_comm,
Finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ] at hs₃ ⊢
rw [hs₃]
rw [Finset.eq_univ_iff_forall] at hs₃ ⊢
exact fun p =>
Exists.elim (exists_line p)-- If `s = univ`, then show `s.bUnion t = univ`
fun l hl => Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨l, Finset.mem_univ l, Set.mem_toFinset.mpr hl⟩
· exact hs₂.trans (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hs₃)
-- If `s < univ`, then consequence of `hs₂`
variable (L)
/-- Number of points on a given line. -/
noncomputable def lineCount (p : P) : ℕ :=
Nat.card { l : L // p ∈ l }
variable (P) {L}
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Configuration.lean | 125 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov, Hunter Monroe
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Sym2
/-!
# Simple graphs
This module defines simple graphs on a vertex type `V` as an irreflexive symmetric relation.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph` is a structure for symmetric, irreflexive relations.
* `SimpleGraph.neighborSet` is the `Set` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex.
* `SimpleGraph.commonNeighbors` is the intersection of the neighbor sets of two given vertices.
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceSet` is the `Set` of edges containing a given vertex.
* `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` instance: Under the subgraph relation, `SimpleGraph` forms a
`CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`. In other words, this is the complete lattice of spanning subgraphs
of the complete graph.
## TODO
* This is the simplest notion of an unoriented graph.
This should eventually fit into a more complete combinatorics hierarchy which includes
multigraphs and directed graphs.
We begin with simple graphs in order to start learning what the combinatorics hierarchy should
look like.
-/
attribute [aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Symmetric
attribute [aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Irreflexive
/--
A variant of the `aesop` tactic for use in the graph library. Changes relative
to standard `aesop`:
- We use the `SimpleGraph` rule set in addition to the default rule sets.
- We instruct Aesop's `intro` rule to unfold with `default` transparency.
- We instruct Aesop to fail if it can't fully solve the goal. This allows us to
use `aesop_graph` for auto-params.
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph) "aesop_graph" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
/--
Use `aesop_graph?` to pass along a `Try this` suggestion when using `aesop_graph`
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph?) "aesop_graph?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop? $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
/--
A variant of `aesop_graph` which does not fail if it is unable to solve the goal.
Use this only for exploration! Nonterminal Aesop is even worse than nonterminal `simp`.
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph_nonterminal) "aesop_graph_nonterminal" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, warnOnNonterminal := false })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
open Finset Function
universe u v w
/-- A simple graph is an irreflexive symmetric relation `Adj` on a vertex type `V`.
The relation describes which pairs of vertices are adjacent.
There is exactly one edge for every pair of adjacent vertices;
see `SimpleGraph.edgeSet` for the corresponding edge set.
-/
@[ext, aesop safe constructors (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])]
structure SimpleGraph (V : Type u) where
/-- The adjacency relation of a simple graph. -/
Adj : V → V → Prop
symm : Symmetric Adj := by aesop_graph
loopless : Irreflexive Adj := by aesop_graph
initialize_simps_projections SimpleGraph (Adj → adj)
/-- Constructor for simple graphs using a symmetric irreflexive boolean function. -/
@[simps]
def SimpleGraph.mk' {V : Type u} :
{adj : V → V → Bool // (∀ x y, adj x y = adj y x) ∧ (∀ x, ¬ adj x x)} ↪ SimpleGraph V where
toFun x := ⟨fun v w ↦ x.1 v w, fun v w ↦ by simp [x.2.1], fun v ↦ by simp [x.2.2]⟩
inj' := by
rintro ⟨adj, _⟩ ⟨adj', _⟩
simp only [mk.injEq, Subtype.mk.injEq]
intro h
funext v w
simpa [Bool.coe_iff_coe] using congr_fun₂ h v w
/-- We can enumerate simple graphs by enumerating all functions `V → V → Bool`
and filtering on whether they are symmetric and irreflexive. -/
instance {V : Type u} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (SimpleGraph V) where
elems := Finset.univ.map SimpleGraph.mk'
complete := by
classical
rintro ⟨Adj, hs, hi⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_univ, true_and, Subtype.exists, Bool.not_eq_true]
refine ⟨fun v w ↦ Adj v w, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· simp [hs.iff]
· intro v; simp [hi v]
· ext
simp
/-- There are finitely many simple graphs on a given finite type. -/
instance SimpleGraph.instFinite {V : Type u} [Finite V] : Finite (SimpleGraph V) :=
.of_injective SimpleGraph.Adj fun _ _ ↦ SimpleGraph.ext
/-- Construct the simple graph induced by the given relation. It
symmetrizes the relation and makes it irreflexive. -/
def SimpleGraph.fromRel {V : Type u} (r : V → V → Prop) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj a b := a ≠ b ∧ (r a b ∨ r b a)
symm := fun _ _ ⟨hn, hr⟩ => ⟨hn.symm, hr.symm⟩
loopless := fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn rfl
@[simp]
theorem SimpleGraph.fromRel_adj {V : Type u} (r : V → V → Prop) (v w : V) :
(SimpleGraph.fromRel r).Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ (r v w ∨ r w v) :=
Iff.rfl
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Ne.symm
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Ne.irrefl
/-- The complete graph on a type `V` is the simple graph with all pairs of distinct vertices
adjacent. In `Mathlib`, this is usually referred to as `⊤`. -/
def completeGraph (V : Type u) : SimpleGraph V where Adj := Ne
/-- The graph with no edges on a given vertex type `V`. `Mathlib` prefers the notation `⊥`. -/
def emptyGraph (V : Type u) : SimpleGraph V where Adj _ _ := False
/-- Two vertices are adjacent in the complete bipartite graph on two vertex types
if and only if they are not from the same side.
Any bipartite graph may be regarded as a subgraph of one of these. -/
@[simps]
def completeBipartiteGraph (V W : Type*) : SimpleGraph (V ⊕ W) where
Adj v w := v.isLeft ∧ w.isRight ∨ v.isRight ∧ w.isLeft
symm v w := by cases v <;> cases w <;> simp
loopless v := by cases v <;> simp
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {ι : Sort*} {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) {a b c u v w : V} {e : Sym2 V}
@[simp]
protected theorem irrefl {v : V} : ¬G.Adj v v :=
G.loopless v
theorem adj_comm (u v : V) : G.Adj u v ↔ G.Adj v u :=
⟨fun x => G.symm x, fun x => G.symm x⟩
@[symm]
theorem adj_symm (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Adj v u :=
G.symm h
theorem Adj.symm {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Adj v u :=
G.symm h
theorem ne_of_adj (h : G.Adj a b) : a ≠ b := by
rintro rfl
exact G.irrefl h
protected theorem Adj.ne {G : SimpleGraph V} {a b : V} (h : G.Adj a b) : a ≠ b :=
G.ne_of_adj h
protected theorem Adj.ne' {G : SimpleGraph V} {a b : V} (h : G.Adj a b) : b ≠ a :=
h.ne.symm
theorem ne_of_adj_of_not_adj {v w x : V} (h : G.Adj v x) (hn : ¬G.Adj w x) : v ≠ w := fun h' =>
hn (h' ▸ h)
theorem adj_injective : Injective (Adj : SimpleGraph V → V → V → Prop) :=
fun _ _ => SimpleGraph.ext
@[simp]
theorem adj_inj {G H : SimpleGraph V} : G.Adj = H.Adj ↔ G = H :=
adj_injective.eq_iff
theorem adj_congr_of_sym2 {u v w x : V} (h : s(u, v) = s(w, x)) : G.Adj u v ↔ G.Adj w x := by
simp only [Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.swap_prod_mk] at h
rcases h with hl | hr
· rw [hl.1, hl.2]
· rw [hr.1, hr.2, adj_comm]
section Order
/-- The relation that one `SimpleGraph` is a subgraph of another.
Note that this should be spelled `≤`. -/
def IsSubgraph (x y : SimpleGraph V) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃v w : V⦄, x.Adj v w → y.Adj v w
instance : LE (SimpleGraph V) :=
⟨IsSubgraph⟩
@[simp]
theorem isSubgraph_eq_le : (IsSubgraph : SimpleGraph V → SimpleGraph V → Prop) = (· ≤ ·) :=
rfl
/-- The supremum of two graphs `x ⊔ y` has edges where either `x` or `y` have edges. -/
instance : Max (SimpleGraph V) where
max x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj ⊔ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by rwa [Pi.sup_apply, Pi.sup_apply, x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem sup_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x ⊔ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∨ y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The infimum of two graphs `x ⊓ y` has edges where both `x` and `y` have edges. -/
instance : Min (SimpleGraph V) where
min x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj ⊓ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by rwa [Pi.inf_apply, Pi.inf_apply, x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x ⊓ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∧ y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
/-- We define `Gᶜ` to be the `SimpleGraph V` such that no two adjacent vertices in `G`
are adjacent in the complement, and every nonadjacent pair of vertices is adjacent
(still ensuring that vertices are not adjacent to themselves). -/
instance hasCompl : HasCompl (SimpleGraph V) where
compl G :=
{ Adj := fun v w => v ≠ w ∧ ¬G.Adj v w
symm := fun v w ⟨hne, _⟩ => ⟨hne.symm, by rwa [adj_comm]⟩
loopless := fun _ ⟨hne, _⟩ => (hne rfl).elim }
@[simp]
theorem compl_adj (G : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : Gᶜ.Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ ¬G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The difference of two graphs `x \ y` has the edges of `x` with the edges of `y` removed. -/
instance sdiff : SDiff (SimpleGraph V) where
sdiff x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj \ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by change x.Adj w v ∧ ¬y.Adj w v; rwa [x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x \ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∧ ¬y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
instance supSet : SupSet (SimpleGraph V) where
sSup s :=
{ Adj := fun a b => ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b
symm := fun _ _ => Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right Adj.symm
loopless := by
rintro a ⟨G, _, ha⟩
exact ha.ne rfl }
instance infSet : InfSet (SimpleGraph V) where
sInf s :=
{ Adj := fun a b => (∀ ⦃G⦄, G ∈ s → Adj G a b) ∧ a ≠ b
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp (forall₂_imp fun _ _ => Adj.symm) Ne.symm
loopless := fun _ h => h.2 rfl }
@[simp]
theorem sSup_adj {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} {a b : V} : (sSup s).Adj a b ↔ ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInf_adj {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} : (sInf s).Adj a b ↔ (∀ G ∈ s, Adj G a b) ∧ a ≠ b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem iSup_adj {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} : (⨆ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∃ i, (f i).Adj a b := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_adj {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} : (⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ (∀ i, (f i).Adj a b) ∧ a ≠ b := by
simp [iInf]
theorem sInf_adj_of_nonempty {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
(sInf s).Adj a b ↔ ∀ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
sInf_adj.trans <|
and_iff_left_of_imp <| by
obtain ⟨G, hG⟩ := hs
exact fun h => (h _ hG).ne
theorem iInf_adj_of_nonempty [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} :
(⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∀ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
rw [iInf, sInf_adj_of_nonempty (Set.range_nonempty _), Set.forall_mem_range]
/-- For graphs `G`, `H`, `G ≤ H` iff `∀ a b, G.Adj a b → H.Adj a b`. -/
instance distribLattice : DistribLattice (SimpleGraph V) :=
{ show DistribLattice (SimpleGraph V) from
adj_injective.distribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl with
le := fun G H => ∀ ⦃a b⦄, G.Adj a b → H.Adj a b }
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (SimpleGraph V) :=
{ SimpleGraph.distribLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
| sup := (· ⊔ ·)
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Basic.lean | 306 | 307 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearForm.Hom
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Finite
/-!
# The bilinear form on a tensor product
## Main definitions
* `LinearMap.BilinMap.tensorDistrib (B₁ ⊗ₜ B₂)`: the bilinear form on `M₁ ⊗ M₂` constructed by
applying `B₁` on `M₁` and `B₂` on `M₂`.
* `LinearMap.BilinMap.tensorDistribEquiv`: `BilinForm.tensorDistrib` as an equivalence on finite
free modules.
-/
suppress_compilation
universe u v w uR uA uM₁ uM₂ uN₁ uN₂
variable {R : Type uR} {A : Type uA} {M₁ : Type uM₁} {M₂ : Type uM₂} {N₁ : Type uN₁} {N₂ : Type uN₂}
open TensorProduct
namespace LinearMap
open LinearMap (BilinMap BilinForm)
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid N₁] [AddCommMonoid N₂]
variable [Algebra R A] [Module R M₁] [Module A M₁] [Module R N₁] [Module A N₁]
variable [SMulCommClass R A M₁] [IsScalarTower R A M₁]
variable [SMulCommClass R A N₁] [IsScalarTower R A N₁]
variable [Module R M₂] [Module R N₂]
namespace BilinMap
variable (R A) in
/-- The tensor product of two bilinear maps injects into bilinear maps on tensor products.
Note this is heterobasic; the bilinear map on the left can take values in a module over a
(commutative) algebra over the ring of the module in which the right bilinear map is valued. -/
def tensorDistrib :
(BilinMap A M₁ N₁ ⊗[R] BilinMap R M₂ N₂) →ₗ[A] BilinMap A (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) (N₁ ⊗[R] N₂) :=
(TensorProduct.lift.equiv A (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) (N₁ ⊗[R] N₂)).symm.toLinearMap ∘ₗ
((LinearMap.llcomp A _ _ _).flip
(TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.tensorTensorTensorComm R A M₁ M₂ M₁ M₂).toLinearMap)
∘ₗ TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.homTensorHomMap R _ _ _ _ _ _
∘ₗ (TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.congr
(TensorProduct.lift.equiv A M₁ M₁ N₁)
(TensorProduct.lift.equiv R _ _ _)).toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem tensorDistrib_tmul (B₁ : BilinMap A M₁ N₁) (B₂ : BilinMap R M₂ N₂) (m₁ : M₁) (m₂ : M₂)
(m₁' : M₁) (m₂' : M₂) :
tensorDistrib R A (B₁ ⊗ₜ B₂) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) (m₁' ⊗ₜ m₂')
= B₁ m₁ m₁' ⊗ₜ B₂ m₂ m₂' :=
rfl
/-- The tensor product of two bilinear forms, a shorthand for dot notation. -/
protected abbrev tmul (B₁ : BilinMap A M₁ N₁) (B₂ : BilinMap R M₂ N₂) :
BilinMap A (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) (N₁ ⊗[R] N₂) :=
tensorDistrib R A (B₁ ⊗ₜ[R] B₂)
attribute [local ext] TensorProduct.ext in
/-- A tensor product of symmetric bilinear maps is symmetric. -/
lemma tmul_isSymm {B₁ : BilinMap A M₁ N₁} {B₂ : BilinMap R M₂ N₂}
(hB₁ : ∀ x y, B₁ x y = B₁ y x) (hB₂ : ∀ x y, B₂ x y = B₂ y x)
(x y : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) :
B₁.tmul B₂ x y = B₁.tmul B₂ y x := by
revert x y
rw [isSymm_iff_eq_flip]
aesop
variable (A) in
/-- The base change of a bilinear map (also known as "extension of scalars"). -/
protected def baseChange (B : BilinMap R M₂ N₂) : BilinMap A (A ⊗[R] M₂) (A ⊗[R] N₂) :=
BilinMap.tmul (R := R) (A := A) (M₁ := A) (M₂ := M₂) (LinearMap.mul A A) B
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_tmul (B₂ : BilinMap R M₂ N₂) (a : A) (m₂ : M₂)
(a' : A) (m₂' : M₂) :
B₂.baseChange A (a ⊗ₜ m₂) (a' ⊗ₜ m₂') = (a * a') ⊗ₜ (B₂ m₂ m₂') :=
rfl
lemma baseChange_isSymm {B₂ : BilinMap R M₂ N₂} (hB₂ : ∀ x y, B₂ x y = B₂ y x) (x y : A ⊗[R] M₂) :
B₂.baseChange A x y = B₂.baseChange A y x :=
tmul_isSymm mul_comm hB₂ x y
end BilinMap
namespace BilinForm
variable (R A) in
/-- The tensor product of two bilinear forms injects into bilinear forms on tensor products.
Note this is heterobasic; the bilinear form on the left can take values in an (commutative) algebra
over the ring in which the right bilinear form is valued. -/
def tensorDistrib : BilinForm A M₁ ⊗[R] BilinForm R M₂ →ₗ[A] BilinForm A (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) :=
(AlgebraTensorModule.rid R A A).congrRight₂.toLinearMap ∘ₗ (BilinMap.tensorDistrib R A)
variable (R A) in
-- TODO: make the RHS `MulOpposite.op (B₂ m₂ m₂') • B₁ m₁ m₁'` so that this has a nicer defeq for
-- `R = A` of `B₁ m₁ m₁' * B₂ m₂ m₂'`, as it did before the generalization in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/6306.
@[simp]
theorem tensorDistrib_tmul (B₁ : BilinForm A M₁) (B₂ : BilinForm R M₂) (m₁ : M₁) (m₂ : M₂)
(m₁' : M₁) (m₂' : M₂) :
tensorDistrib R A (B₁ ⊗ₜ B₂) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) (m₁' ⊗ₜ m₂')
= B₂ m₂ m₂' • B₁ m₁ m₁' :=
rfl
/-- The tensor product of two bilinear forms, a shorthand for dot notation. -/
protected abbrev tmul (B₁ : BilinForm A M₁) (B₂ : BilinMap R M₂ R) : BilinMap A (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) A :=
tensorDistrib R A (B₁ ⊗ₜ[R] B₂)
attribute [local ext] TensorProduct.ext in
/-- A tensor product of symmetric bilinear forms is symmetric. -/
lemma _root_.LinearMap.IsSymm.tmul {B₁ : BilinForm A M₁} {B₂ : BilinForm R M₂}
(hB₁ : B₁.IsSymm) (hB₂ : B₂.IsSymm) : (B₁.tmul B₂).IsSymm := by
rw [LinearMap.isSymm_iff_eq_flip]
ext x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂
| exact congr_arg₂ (HSMul.hSMul) (hB₂ x₂ y₂) (hB₁ x₁ y₁)
variable (A) in
/-- The base change of a bilinear form. -/
protected def baseChange (B : BilinForm R M₂) : BilinForm A (A ⊗[R] M₂) :=
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/BilinearForm/TensorProduct.lean | 131 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Monotone
/-!
# Left and right limits
We define the (strict) left and right limits of a function.
* `leftLim f x` is the strict left limit of `f` at `x` (using `f x` as a garbage value if `x`
is isolated to its left).
* `rightLim f x` is the strict right limit of `f` at `x` (using `f x` as a garbage value if `x`
is isolated to its right).
We develop a comprehensive API for monotone functions. Notably,
* `Monotone.continuousAt_iff_leftLim_eq_rightLim` states that a monotone function is continuous
at a point if and only if its left and right limits coincide.
* `Monotone.countable_not_continuousAt` asserts that a monotone function taking values in a
second-countable space has at most countably many discontinuity points.
We also port the API to antitone functions.
## TODO
Prove corresponding stronger results for `StrictMono` and `StrictAnti` functions.
-/
open Set Filter
open Topology
section
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- Let `f : α → β` be a function from a linear order `α` to a topological space `β`, and
let `a : α`. The limit strictly to the left of `f` at `a`, denoted with `leftLim f a`, is defined
by using the order topology on `α`. If `a` is isolated to its left or the function has no left
limit, we use `f a` instead to guarantee a good behavior in most cases. -/
noncomputable def Function.leftLim (f : α → β) (a : α) : β := by
classical
haveI : Nonempty β := ⟨f a⟩
letI : TopologicalSpace α := Preorder.topology α
exact if 𝓝[<] a = ⊥ ∨ ¬∃ y, Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 y) then f a else limUnder (𝓝[<] a) f
/-- Let `f : α → β` be a function from a linear order `α` to a topological space `β`, and
let `a : α`. The limit strictly to the right of `f` at `a`, denoted with `rightLim f a`, is defined
by using the order topology on `α`. If `a` is isolated to its right or the function has no right
limit, , we use `f a` instead to guarantee a good behavior in most cases. -/
noncomputable def Function.rightLim (f : α → β) (a : α) : β :=
@Function.leftLim αᵒᵈ β _ _ f a
open Function
theorem leftLim_eq_of_tendsto [hα : TopologicalSpace α] [h'α : OrderTopology α] [T2Space β]
{f : α → β} {a : α} {y : β} (h : 𝓝[<] a ≠ ⊥) (h' : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 y)) :
leftLim f a = y := by
have h'' : ∃ y, Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 y) := ⟨y, h'⟩
| rw [h'α.topology_eq_generate_intervals] at h h' h''
simp only [leftLim, h, h'', not_true, or_self_iff, if_false]
haveI := neBot_iff.2 h
exact lim_eq h'
theorem leftLim_eq_of_eq_bot [hα : TopologicalSpace α] [h'α : OrderTopology α] (f : α → β) {a : α}
(h : 𝓝[<] a = ⊥) : leftLim f a = f a := by
rw [h'α.topology_eq_generate_intervals] at h
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/LeftRightLim.lean | 65 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Group
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.EllipticDivisibilitySequence
/-!
# Division polynomials of Weierstrass curves
This file defines certain polynomials associated to division polynomials of Weierstrass curves.
These are defined in terms of the auxiliary sequences for normalised elliptic divisibility sequences
(EDS) as defined in `Mathlib.NumberTheory.EllipticDivisibilitySequence`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a commutative ring `R`. The sequence of `n`-division polynomials
`ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` of `W` is the normalised EDS with initial values
* `ψ₀ := 0`,
* `ψ₁ := 1`,
* `ψ₂ := 2Y + a₁X + a₃`,
* `ψ₃ := 3X⁴ + b₂X³ + 3b₄X² + 3b₆X + b₈`, and
* `ψ₄ := ψ₂ ⬝ (2X⁶ + b₂X⁵ + 5b₄X⁴ + 10b₆X³ + 10b₈X² + (b₂b₈ - b₄b₆)X + (b₄b₈ - b₆²))`.
Furthermore, define the associated sequences `φₙ, ωₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` by
* `φₙ := Xψₙ² - ψₙ₊₁ ⬝ ψₙ₋₁`, and
* `ωₙ := (ψ₂ₙ / ψₙ - ψₙ ⬝ (a₁φₙ + a₃ψₙ²)) / 2`.
Note that `ωₙ` is always well-defined as a polynomial in `R[X, Y]`. As a start, it can be shown by
induction that `ψₙ` always divides `ψ₂ₙ` in `R[X, Y]`, so that `ψ₂ₙ / ψₙ` is always well-defined as
a polynomial, while division by `2` is well-defined when `R` has characteristic different from `2`.
In general, it can be shown that `2` always divides the polynomial `ψ₂ₙ / ψₙ - ψₙ ⬝ (a₁φₙ + a₃ψₙ²)`
in the characteristic `0` universal ring `𝓡[X, Y] := ℤ[A₁, A₂, A₃, A₄, A₆][X, Y]` of `W`, where the
`Aᵢ` are indeterminates. Then `ωₙ` can be equivalently defined as the image of this division under
the associated universal morphism `𝓡[X, Y] → R[X, Y]` mapping `Aᵢ` to `aᵢ`.
Now, in the coordinate ring `R[W]`, note that `ψ₂²` is congruent to the polynomial
`Ψ₂Sq := 4X³ + b₂X² + 2b₄X + b₆ ∈ R[X]`. As such, the recurrences of a normalised EDS show that
`ψₙ / ψ₂` are congruent to certain polynomials in `R[W]`. In particular, define `preΨₙ ∈ R[X]` as
the auxiliary sequence for a normalised EDS with extra parameter `Ψ₂Sq²` and initial values
* `preΨ₀ := 0`,
* `preΨ₁ := 1`,
* `preΨ₂ := 1`,
* `preΨ₃ := ψ₃`, and
* `preΨ₄ := ψ₄ / ψ₂`.
The corresponding normalised EDS `Ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` is then given by
* `Ψₙ := preΨₙ ⬝ ψ₂` if `n` is even, and
* `Ψₙ := preΨₙ` if `n` is odd.
Furthermore, define the associated sequences `ΨSqₙ, Φₙ ∈ R[X]` by
* `ΨSqₙ := preΨₙ² ⬝ Ψ₂Sq` if `n` is even,
* `ΨSqₙ := preΨₙ²` if `n` is odd,
* `Φₙ := XΨSqₙ - preΨₙ₊₁ ⬝ preΨₙ₋₁` if `n` is even, and
* `Φₙ := XΨSqₙ - preΨₙ₊₁ ⬝ preΨₙ₋₁ ⬝ Ψ₂Sq` if `n` is odd.
With these definitions, `ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` and `φₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` are congruent in `R[W]` to `Ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]`
and `Φₙ ∈ R[X]` respectively, which are defined in terms of `Ψ₂Sq ∈ R[X]` and `preΨₙ ∈ R[X]`.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.preΨ`: the univariate polynomials `preΨₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.ΨSq`: the univariate polynomials `ΨSqₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Ψ`: the bivariate polynomials `Ψₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Φ`: the univariate polynomials `Φₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.ψ`: the bivariate `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.φ`: the bivariate polynomials `φₙ`.
* TODO: the bivariate polynomials `ωₙ`.
## Implementation notes
Analogously to `Mathlib.NumberTheory.EllipticDivisibilitySequence`, the bivariate polynomials
`Ψₙ` are defined in terms of the univariate polynomials `preΨₙ`. This is done partially to avoid
ring division, but more crucially to allow the definition of `ΨSqₙ` and `Φₙ` as univariate
polynomials without needing to work under the coordinate ring, and to allow the computation of their
leading terms without ambiguity. Furthermore, evaluating these polynomials at a rational point on
`W` recovers their original definition up to linear combinations of the Weierstrass equation of `W`,
hence also avoiding the need to work in the coordinate ring.
TODO: implementation notes for the definition of `ωₙ`.
## References
[J Silverman, *The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves*][silverman2009]
## Tags
elliptic curve, division polynomial, torsion point
-/
open Polynomial
open scoped Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "map_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, map_neg, map_add, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow, map_div₀,
Polynomial.map_ofNat, Polynomial.map_one, map_C, map_X, Polynomial.map_neg, Polynomial.map_add,
Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_pow, Polynomial.map_div, coe_mapRingHom,
apply_ite <| mapRingHom _, WeierstrassCurve.map])
universe r s u v
namespace WeierstrassCurve
variable {R : Type r} {S : Type s} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (W : WeierstrassCurve R)
section Ψ₂Sq
/-! ### The univariate polynomial `Ψ₂Sq` -/
/-- The `2`-division polynomial `ψ₂ = Ψ₂`. -/
noncomputable def ψ₂ : R[X][Y] :=
W.toAffine.polynomialY
/-- The univariate polynomial `Ψ₂Sq` congruent to `ψ₂²`. -/
noncomputable def Ψ₂Sq : R[X] :=
C 4 * X ^ 3 + C W.b₂ * X ^ 2 + C (2 * W.b₄) * X + C W.b₆
lemma C_Ψ₂Sq : C W.Ψ₂Sq = W.ψ₂ ^ 2 - 4 * W.toAffine.polynomial := by
rw [Ψ₂Sq, ψ₂, b₂, b₄, b₆, Affine.polynomialY, Affine.polynomial]
C_simp
ring1
lemma ψ₂_sq : W.ψ₂ ^ 2 = C W.Ψ₂Sq + 4 * W.toAffine.polynomial := by
rw [C_Ψ₂Sq, sub_add_cancel]
lemma Affine.CoordinateRing.mk_ψ₂_sq : mk W W.ψ₂ ^ 2 = mk W (C W.Ψ₂Sq) := by
rw [C_Ψ₂Sq, map_sub, map_mul, AdjoinRoot.mk_self, mul_zero, sub_zero, map_pow]
-- TODO: remove `twoTorsionPolynomial` in favour of `Ψ₂Sq`
lemma Ψ₂Sq_eq : W.Ψ₂Sq = W.twoTorsionPolynomial.toPoly :=
rfl
end Ψ₂Sq
section preΨ'
/-! ### The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℕ` -/
/-- The `3`-division polynomial `ψ₃ = Ψ₃`. -/
noncomputable def Ψ₃ : R[X] :=
3 * X ^ 4 + C W.b₂ * X ^ 3 + 3 * C W.b₄ * X ^ 2 + 3 * C W.b₆ * X + C W.b₈
/-- The univariate polynomial `preΨ₄`, which is auxiliary to the 4-division polynomial
`ψ₄ = Ψ₄ = preΨ₄ψ₂`. -/
noncomputable def preΨ₄ : R[X] :=
2 * X ^ 6 + C W.b₂ * X ^ 5 + 5 * C W.b₄ * X ^ 4 + 10 * C W.b₆ * X ^ 3 + 10 * C W.b₈ * X ^ 2 +
C (W.b₂ * W.b₈ - W.b₄ * W.b₆) * X + C (W.b₄ * W.b₈ - W.b₆ ^ 2)
/-- The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℕ`, which are auxiliary to the bivariate polynomials
`Ψₙ` congruent to the bivariate `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`. -/
noncomputable def preΨ' (n : ℕ) : R[X] :=
preNormEDS' (W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) W.Ψ₃ W.preΨ₄ n
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_zero : W.preΨ' 0 = 0 :=
preNormEDS'_zero ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_one : W.preΨ' 1 = 1 :=
preNormEDS'_one ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_two : W.preΨ' 2 = 1 :=
preNormEDS'_two ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_three : W.preΨ' 3 = W.Ψ₃ :=
preNormEDS'_three ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_four : W.preΨ' 4 = W.preΨ₄ :=
preNormEDS'_four ..
lemma preΨ'_even (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ' (2 * (m + 3)) =
W.preΨ' (m + 2) ^ 2 * W.preΨ' (m + 3) * W.preΨ' (m + 5) -
W.preΨ' (m + 1) * W.preΨ' (m + 3) * W.preΨ' (m + 4) ^ 2 :=
preNormEDS'_even ..
lemma preΨ'_odd (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ' (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
W.preΨ' (m + 4) * W.preΨ' (m + 2) ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ' (m + 1) * W.preΨ' (m + 3) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) :=
preNormEDS'_odd ..
end preΨ'
section preΨ
/-! ### The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℤ` -/
/-- The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℤ`, which are auxiliary to the bivariate polynomials
`Ψₙ` congruent to the bivariate `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`. -/
noncomputable def preΨ (n : ℤ) : R[X] :=
preNormEDS (W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) W.Ψ₃ W.preΨ₄ n
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_ofNat (n : ℕ) : W.preΨ n = W.preΨ' n :=
preNormEDS_ofNat ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_zero : W.preΨ 0 = 0 :=
preNormEDS_zero ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_one : W.preΨ 1 = 1 :=
preNormEDS_one ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_two : W.preΨ 2 = 1 :=
preNormEDS_two ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_three : W.preΨ 3 = W.Ψ₃ :=
preNormEDS_three ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_four : W.preΨ 4 = W.preΨ₄ :=
preNormEDS_four ..
lemma preΨ_even_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ (2 * (m + 3)) =
W.preΨ (m + 2) ^ 2 * W.preΨ (m + 3) * W.preΨ (m + 5) -
W.preΨ (m + 1) * W.preΨ (m + 3) * W.preΨ (m + 4) ^ 2 :=
preNormEDS_even_ofNat ..
lemma preΨ_odd_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
W.preΨ (m + 4) * W.preΨ (m + 2) ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ (m + 1) * W.preΨ (m + 3) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) :=
preNormEDS_odd_ofNat ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_neg (n : ℤ) : W.preΨ (-n) = -W.preΨ n :=
preNormEDS_neg ..
lemma preΨ_even (m : ℤ) : W.preΨ (2 * m) =
W.preΨ (m - 1) ^ 2 * W.preΨ m * W.preΨ (m + 2) -
W.preΨ (m - 2) * W.preΨ m * W.preΨ (m + 1) ^ 2 :=
preNormEDS_even ..
lemma preΨ_odd (m : ℤ) : W.preΨ (2 * m + 1) =
W.preΨ (m + 2) * W.preΨ m ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ (m - 1) * W.preΨ (m + 1) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) :=
preNormEDS_odd ..
end preΨ
section ΨSq
/-! ### The univariate polynomials `ΨSqₙ` -/
/-- The univariate polynomials `ΨSqₙ` congruent to `ψₙ²`. -/
noncomputable def ΨSq (n : ℤ) : R[X] :=
W.preΨ n ^ 2 * if Even n then W.Ψ₂Sq else 1
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_ofNat (n : ℕ) : W.ΨSq n = W.preΨ' n ^ 2 * if Even n then W.Ψ₂Sq else 1 := by
| simp only [ΨSq, preΨ_ofNat, Int.even_coe_nat]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/DivisionPolynomial/Basic.lean | 259 | 261 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.RCLike
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Hausdorff
/-!
# Hausdorff dimension
The Hausdorff dimension of a set `X` in an (extended) metric space is the unique number
`dimH s : ℝ≥0∞` such that for any `d : ℝ≥0` we have
- `μH[d] s = 0` if `dimH s < d`, and
- `μH[d] s = ∞` if `d < dimH s`.
In this file we define `dimH s` to be the Hausdorff dimension of `s`, then prove some basic
properties of Hausdorff dimension.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.dimH`: the Hausdorff dimension of a set. For the Hausdorff dimension of the whole
space we use `MeasureTheory.dimH (Set.univ : Set X)`.
## Main results
### Basic properties of Hausdorff dimension
* `hausdorffMeasure_of_lt_dimH`, `dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top`,
`le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top`, `hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt`, `measure_zero_of_dimH_lt`,
`le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero`, `dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero_ne_top`: various forms
of the characteristic property of the Hausdorff dimension;
* `dimH_union`: the Hausdorff dimension of the union of two sets is the maximum of their Hausdorff
dimensions.
* `dimH_iUnion`, `dimH_bUnion`, `dimH_sUnion`: the Hausdorff dimension of a countable union of sets
is the supremum of their Hausdorff dimensions;
* `dimH_empty`, `dimH_singleton`, `Set.Subsingleton.dimH_zero`, `Set.Countable.dimH_zero` : `dimH s
= 0` whenever `s` is countable;
### (Pre)images under (anti)lipschitz and Hölder continuous maps
* `HolderWith.dimH_image_le` etc: if `f : X → Y` is Hölder continuous with exponent `r > 0`, then
for any `s`, `dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s / r`. We prove versions of this statement for `HolderWith`,
`HolderOnWith`, and locally Hölder maps, as well as for `Set.image` and `Set.range`.
* `LipschitzWith.dimH_image_le` etc: Lipschitz continuous maps do not increase the Hausdorff
dimension of sets.
* for a map that is known to be both Lipschitz and antilipschitz (e.g., for an `Isometry` or
a `ContinuousLinearEquiv`) we also prove `dimH (f '' s) = dimH s`.
### Hausdorff measure in `ℝⁿ`
* `Real.dimH_of_nonempty_interior`: if `s` is a set in a finite dimensional real vector space `E`
with nonempty interior, then the Hausdorff dimension of `s` is equal to the dimension of `E`.
* `dense_compl_of_dimH_lt_finrank`: if `s` is a set in a finite dimensional real vector space `E`
with Hausdorff dimension strictly less than the dimension of `E`, the `s` has a dense complement.
* `ContDiff.dense_compl_range_of_finrank_lt_finrank`: the complement to the range of a `C¹`
smooth map is dense provided that the dimension of the domain is strictly less than the dimension
of the codomain.
## Notations
We use the following notation localized in `MeasureTheory`. It is defined in
`MeasureTheory.Measure.Hausdorff`.
- `μH[d]` : `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure d`
## Implementation notes
* The definition of `dimH` explicitly uses `borel X` as a measurable space structure. This way we
can formulate lemmas about Hausdorff dimension without assuming that the environment has a
`[MeasurableSpace X]` instance that is equal but possibly not defeq to `borel X`.
Lemma `dimH_def` unfolds this definition using whatever `[MeasurableSpace X]` instance we have in
the environment (as long as it is equal to `borel X`).
* The definition `dimH` is irreducible; use API lemmas or `dimH_def` instead.
## Tags
Hausdorff measure, Hausdorff dimension, dimension
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal NNReal Topology
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set TopologicalSpace Module Filter
variable {ι X Y : Type*} [EMetricSpace X] [EMetricSpace Y]
/-- Hausdorff dimension of a set in an (e)metric space. -/
@[irreducible] noncomputable def dimH (s : Set X) : ℝ≥0∞ := by
borelize X; exact ⨆ (d : ℝ≥0) (_ : @hausdorffMeasure X _ _ ⟨rfl⟩ d s = ∞), d
/-!
### Basic properties
-/
section Measurable
variable [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X]
/-- Unfold the definition of `dimH` using `[MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X]` from the
environment. -/
theorem dimH_def (s : Set X) : dimH s = ⨆ (d : ℝ≥0) (_ : μH[d] s = ∞), (d : ℝ≥0∞) := by
borelize X; rw [dimH]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_of_lt_dimH {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : ↑d < dimH s) : μH[d] s = ∞ := by
simp only [dimH_def, lt_iSup_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨d', hsd', hdd'⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at hdd'
exact top_unique (hsd' ▸ hausdorffMeasure_mono hdd'.le _)
theorem dimH_le {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0∞} (H : ∀ d' : ℝ≥0, μH[d'] s = ∞ → ↑d' ≤ d) : dimH s ≤ d :=
(dimH_def s).trans_le <| iSup₂_le H
theorem dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μH[d] s ≠ ∞) : dimH s ≤ d :=
le_of_not_lt <| mt hausdorffMeasure_of_lt_dimH h
theorem le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μH[d] s = ∞) :
↑d ≤ dimH s := by
rw [dimH_def]; exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) d h
theorem hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : dimH s < d) : μH[d] s = 0 := by
rw [dimH_def] at h
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 h with ⟨d', hsd', hd'd⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at hd'd
exact (hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top hd'd s).resolve_right fun h₂ => hsd'.not_le <|
le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) d' h₂
theorem measure_zero_of_dimH_lt {μ : Measure X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μ ≪ μH[d]) {s : Set X}
(hd : dimH s < d) : μ s = 0 :=
h <| hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt hd
theorem le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μH[d] s ≠ 0) : ↑d ≤ dimH s :=
le_of_not_lt <| mt hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt h
theorem dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero_ne_top {d : ℝ≥0} {s : Set X} (h : μH[d] s ≠ 0)
(h' : μH[d] s ≠ ∞) : dimH s = d :=
le_antisymm (dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top h') (le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero h)
end Measurable
@[mono]
theorem dimH_mono {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : dimH s ≤ dimH t := by
borelize X
exact dimH_le fun d hd => le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top <| top_unique <| hd ▸ measure_mono h
theorem dimH_subsingleton {s : Set X} (h : s.Subsingleton) : dimH s = 0 := by
borelize X
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
refine dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top ?_
exact ((hausdorffMeasure_le_one_of_subsingleton h le_rfl).trans_lt ENNReal.one_lt_top).ne
alias Set.Subsingleton.dimH_zero := dimH_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem dimH_empty : dimH (∅ : Set X) = 0 :=
subsingleton_empty.dimH_zero
@[simp]
theorem dimH_singleton (x : X) : dimH ({x} : Set X) = 0 :=
subsingleton_singleton.dimH_zero
@[simp]
theorem dimH_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set X) :
dimH (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, dimH (s i) := by
borelize X
refine le_antisymm (dimH_le fun d hd => ?_) (iSup_le fun i => dimH_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
contrapose! hd
have : ∀ i, μH[d] (s i) = 0 := fun i =>
hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt ((le_iSup (fun i => dimH (s i)) i).trans_lt hd)
rw [measure_iUnion_null this]
exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem dimH_bUnion {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Countable) (t : ι → Set X) :
dimH (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, dimH (t i) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, dimH_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
@[simp]
theorem dimH_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Countable) : dimH (⋃₀ S) = ⨆ s ∈ S, dimH s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, dimH_bUnion hS]
@[simp]
theorem dimH_union (s t : Set X) : dimH (s ∪ t) = max (dimH s) (dimH t) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, dimH_iUnion, iSup_bool_eq, cond, cond]
theorem dimH_countable {s : Set X} (hs : s.Countable) : dimH s = 0 :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ by simp only [dimH_bUnion hs, dimH_singleton, ENNReal.iSup_zero]
alias Set.Countable.dimH_zero := dimH_countable
theorem dimH_finite {s : Set X} (hs : s.Finite) : dimH s = 0 :=
hs.countable.dimH_zero
alias Set.Finite.dimH_zero := dimH_finite
@[simp]
theorem dimH_coe_finset (s : Finset X) : dimH (s : Set X) = 0 :=
s.finite_toSet.dimH_zero
alias Finset.dimH_zero := dimH_coe_finset
/-!
### Hausdorff dimension as the supremum of local Hausdorff dimensions
-/
section
variable [SecondCountableTopology X]
/-- If `r` is less than the Hausdorff dimension of a set `s` in an (extended) metric space with
second countable topology, then there exists a point `x ∈ s` such that every neighborhood
`t` of `x` within `s` has Hausdorff dimension greater than `r`. -/
theorem exists_mem_nhdsWithin_lt_dimH_of_lt_dimH {s : Set X} {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r < dimH s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ∀ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, r < dimH t := by
contrapose! h; choose! t htx htr using h
rcases countable_cover_nhdsWithin htx with ⟨S, hSs, hSc, hSU⟩
calc
dimH s ≤ dimH (⋃ x ∈ S, t x) := dimH_mono hSU
_ = ⨆ x ∈ S, dimH (t x) := dimH_bUnion hSc _
_ ≤ r := iSup₂_le fun x hx => htr x <| hSs hx
/-- In an (extended) metric space with second countable topology, the Hausdorff dimension
of a set `s` is the supremum over `x ∈ s` of the limit superiors of `dimH t` along
`(𝓝[s] x).smallSets`. -/
theorem bsupr_limsup_dimH (s : Set X) : ⨆ x ∈ s, limsup dimH (𝓝[s] x).smallSets = dimH s := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun x _ => ?_) ?_
· refine limsup_le_of_le isCobounded_le_of_bot ?_
exact eventually_smallSets.2 ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, fun t => dimH_mono⟩
· refine le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense fun r hr => ?_
rcases exists_mem_nhdsWithin_lt_dimH_of_lt_dimH hr with ⟨x, hxs, hxr⟩
refine le_iSup₂_of_le x hxs ?_; rw [limsup_eq]; refine le_sInf fun b hb => ?_
rcases eventually_smallSets.1 hb with ⟨t, htx, ht⟩
exact (hxr t htx).le.trans (ht t Subset.rfl)
/-- In an (extended) metric space with second countable topology, the Hausdorff dimension
of a set `s` is the supremum over all `x` of the limit superiors of `dimH t` along
`(𝓝[s] x).smallSets`. -/
theorem iSup_limsup_dimH (s : Set X) : ⨆ x, limsup dimH (𝓝[s] x).smallSets = dimH s := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun x => ?_) ?_
· refine limsup_le_of_le isCobounded_le_of_bot ?_
exact eventually_smallSets.2 ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, fun t => dimH_mono⟩
· rw [← bsupr_limsup_dimH]; exact iSup₂_le_iSup _ _
end
/-!
### Hausdorff dimension and Hölder continuity
-/
variable {C K r : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y} {s : Set X}
/-- If `f` is a Hölder continuous map with exponent `r > 0`, then `dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s / r`. -/
theorem HolderOnWith.dimH_image_le (h : HolderOnWith C r f s) (hr : 0 < r) :
dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s / r := by
borelize X Y
refine dimH_le fun d hd => ?_
have := h.hausdorffMeasure_image_le hr d.coe_nonneg
rw [hd, ← ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ d.coe_nonneg, top_le_iff] at this
have Hrd : μH[(r * d : ℝ≥0)] s = ⊤ := by
contrapose this
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top this
rw [ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le, mul_comm, ← ENNReal.coe_mul]
exacts [le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top Hrd, Or.inl (mt ENNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 hr.ne'),
| Or.inl ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
namespace HolderWith
/-- If `f : X → Y` is Hölder continuous with a positive exponent `r`, then the Hausdorff dimension
of the image of a set `s` is at most `dimH s / r`. -/
theorem dimH_image_le (h : HolderWith C r f) (hr : 0 < r) (s : Set X) :
dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s / r :=
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/HausdorffDimension.lean | 271 | 278 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Nakayama
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Jacobson.Ideal
/-!
# Nakayama's lemma
This file contains some alternative statements of Nakayama's Lemma as found in
[Stacks: Nakayama's Lemma](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV).
## Main statements
* `Submodule.eq_smul_of_le_smul_of_le_jacobson` - A version of (2) in
[Stacks: Nakayama's Lemma](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV),
generalising to the Jacobson of any ideal.
* `Submodule.eq_bot_of_le_smul_of_le_jacobson_bot` - Statement (2) in
[Stacks: Nakayama's Lemma](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV).
* `Submodule.sup_smul_eq_sup_smul_of_le_smul_of_le_jacobson` - A version of (4) in
[Stacks: Nakayama's Lemma](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV),
generalising to the Jacobson of any ideal.
* `Submodule.smul_le_of_le_smul_of_le_jacobson_bot` - Statement (4) in
[Stacks: Nakayama's Lemma](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV).
Note that a version of Statement (1) in
[Stacks: Nakayama's Lemma](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) can be found in
`RingTheory.Finiteness` under the name
`Submodule.exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul`
## References
* [Stacks: Nakayama's Lemma](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV)
## Tags
Nakayama, Jacobson
-/
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
open Ideal
namespace Submodule
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma** - A slightly more general version of (2) in
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV).
See also `eq_bot_of_le_smul_of_le_jacobson_bot` for the special case when `J = ⊥`. -/
| @[stacks 00DV "(2)"]
theorem eq_smul_of_le_smul_of_le_jacobson {I J : Ideal R} {N : Submodule R M} (hN : N.FG)
(hIN : N ≤ I • N) (hIjac : I ≤ jacobson J) : N = J • N := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Submodule.smul_le.2 fun _ _ _ => Submodule.smul_mem _ _)
intro n hn
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := Submodule.exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul I N hN hIN
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_mul_sub_mem_of_sub_one_mem_jacobson r (hIjac hr.1)
have : n = -(s * r - 1) • n := by
rw [neg_sub, sub_smul, mul_smul, hr.2 n hn, one_smul, smul_zero, sub_zero]
rw [this]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Nakayama.lean | 52 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Basic lemmas on prime factorizations
-/
open Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-! ### Basic facts about factorization -/
/-! ## Lemmas characterising when `n.factorization p = 0` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero.1 hr0).2
/-- The only numbers with empty prime factorization are `0` and `1` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_primeFactorsList_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of products and powers -/
/-- A product over `n.factorization` can be written as a product over `n.primeFactors`; -/
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
/-- A product over `n.primeFactors` can be written as a product over `n.factorization`; -/
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of primes and prime powers -/
/-- The multiplicity of prime `p` in `p` is `1` -/
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
/-- If the factorization of `n` contains just one number `p` then `n` is a power of `p` -/
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h]
simp
/-- The only prime factor of prime `p` is `p` itself. -/
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
/-! ### Equivalence between `ℕ+` and `ℕ →₀ ℕ` with support in the primes. -/
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ordProj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordProj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_of_not_prime := ordProj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ordCompl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordCompl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_of_not_prime := ordCompl_of_not_prime
theorem ordCompl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_dvd := ordCompl_dvd
theorem ordProj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ordProj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_pos := ordProj_pos
theorem ordProj_le {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ordProj[p] n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_le := ordProj_le
theorem ordCompl_pos {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < ordCompl[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then
exact Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hn) (ordProj_pos n p)
else
simpa [Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_pos := ordCompl_pos
theorem ordCompl_le (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ≤ n :=
Nat.div_le_self _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_le := ordCompl_le
theorem ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self (n p : ℕ) : ordProj[p] n * ordCompl[p] n = n :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self := ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self
theorem ordProj_mul {a b : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
ordProj[p] (a * b) = ordProj[p] a * ordProj[p] b := by
simp [factorization_mul ha hb, pow_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_mul := ordProj_mul
theorem ordCompl_mul (a b p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] (a * b) = ordCompl[p] a * ordCompl[p] b := by
if ha : a = 0 then simp [ha] else
if hb : b = 0 then simp [hb] else
simp only [ordProj_mul p ha hb]
rw [div_mul_div_comm (ordProj_dvd a p) (ordProj_dvd b p)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_mul := ordCompl_mul
/-! ### Factorization and divisibility -/
/-- A crude upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_lt {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization p < n := by
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· exact (Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (ordProj_le p hn).trans_lt <|
Nat.lt_pow_self pp.one_lt
· simpa only [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
/-- An upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_le_of_le_pow {n p b : ℕ} (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) : n.factorization p ≤ b := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then
exact (Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 ((ordProj_le p hn).trans hb)
else
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp]
theorem factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → d.factorization p ≤ n.factorization p) ↔ d ∣ n := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
refine ⟨fun h p => (em p.Prime).elim (h p) fun hp => ?_, fun h p _ => h p⟩
simp_rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_left {a b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
rw [factorization_le_iff_dvd ha <| mul_ne_zero ha hb]
exact Dvd.intro b rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_right {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply factorization_le_factorization_mul_left ha
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ k ≤ n.factorization p := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos pp.pos k).ne' hn, pp.factorization_pow, single_le_iff]
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ p ^ k ∣ ordProj[p] n := by
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj := Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ 1 ≤ n.factorization p :=
Iff.trans (by simp) (pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn)
theorem exists_factorization_lt_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : a < b) :
∃ p : ℕ, a.factorization p < b.factorization p := by
have hb : b ≠ 0 := (ha.bot_lt.trans hab).ne'
contrapose! hab
rw [← Finsupp.le_def, factorization_le_iff_dvd hb ha] at hab
exact le_of_dvd ha.bot_lt hab
@[simp]
theorem factorization_div {d n : ℕ} (h : d ∣ n) :
(n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd); · simp [zero_dvd_iff.mp h]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · simp [tsub_eq_zero_of_le]
apply add_left_injective d.factorization
simp only
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| (Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn).mpr h, ←
Nat.factorization_mul (Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h) hd.bot_lt).ne' hd,
Nat.div_mul_cancel h]
theorem dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (pp : p.Prime) (h : p ∣ n) : p ∣ ordProj[p] n :=
dvd_pow_self p (Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd pp hn h).ne'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem not_dvd_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ¬p ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
rw [Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hp (ordCompl_pos p hn).ne']
rw [Nat.factorization_div (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [hp.factorization]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias not_dvd_ord_compl := not_dvd_ordCompl
theorem coprime_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : Coprime p (ordCompl[p] n) :=
(or_iff_left (not_dvd_ordCompl hp hn)).mp <| coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias coprime_ord_compl := coprime_ordCompl
theorem factorization_ordCompl (n p : ℕ) :
(ordCompl[p] n).factorization = n.factorization.erase p := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
simp [pp]
ext q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp only [Finsupp.erase_same, factorization_eq_zero_iff, not_dvd_ordCompl pp hn]
simp
· rw [Finsupp.erase_ne hqp, factorization_div (ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [pp.factorization, hqp.symm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias factorization_ord_compl := factorization_ordCompl
-- `ordCompl[p] n` is the largest divisor of `n` not divisible by `p`.
theorem dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd {p d n : ℕ} (hdn : d ∣ n) (hpd : ¬p ∣ d) :
d ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
if hn0 : n = 0 then simp [hn0] else
if hd0 : d = 0 then simp [hd0] at hpd else
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 (ordCompl_pos p hn0).ne', factorization_ordCompl]
intro q
if hqp : q = p then
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hqp, hpd]
else
simp [hqp, (factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 hn0).2 hdn q]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd := dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd
/-- If `n` is a nonzero natural number and `p ≠ 1`, then there are natural numbers `e`
and `n'` such that `n'` is not divisible by `p` and `n = p^e * n'`. -/
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 1) :
∃ e n' : ℕ, ¬p ∣ n' ∧ n = p ^ e * n' :=
let ⟨a', h₁, h₂⟩ :=
(Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff.mpr ⟨hp, Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn⟩).exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
⟨_, a', h₂, h₁⟩
/-- Any nonzero natural number is the product of an odd part `m` and a power of
two `2 ^ k`. -/
theorem exists_eq_two_pow_mul_odd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∃ k m : ℕ, Odd m ∧ n = 2 ^ k * m :=
let ⟨k, m, hm, hn⟩ := exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd hn 2 (succ_ne_self 1)
⟨k, m, not_even_iff_odd.1 (mt Even.two_dvd hm), hn⟩
theorem dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hdn : d ≤ n) :
d ∣ n ↔ (n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
refine ⟨factorization_div, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hdn with (rfl | hd_lt_n); · simp
have h1 : n / d ≠ 0 := by simp [*]
intro h
rw [dvd_iff_le_div_mul n d]
by_contra h2
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_factorization_lt_of_lt (mul_ne_zero h1 hd) (not_le.mp h2)
rwa [factorization_mul h1 hd, add_apply, ← lt_tsub_iff_right, h, tsub_apply,
lt_self_iff_false] at hp
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hb0 : b ≠ 0) (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp); · simp [pp]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0); · simp
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab p
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd {a b : ℕ} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hb0 : b ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd hb0 hab p⟩
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0]
intro q
rcases le_or_lt q 1 with (hq_le | hq1)
· interval_cases q <;> simp
exact (pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right hq1).1 (h q)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp)
· simp [pp, hab]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0)
· cases hb0 (zero_dvd_iff.1 hab)
have ha := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p ha0) (ordProj_pos a p)).ne'
have hb := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hb0) (ordProj_pos b p)).ne'
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha hb, factorization_ordCompl a p, factorization_ordCompl b p]
intro q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp
simp_rw [erase_ne hqp]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab q
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd hab p⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
if pa : a.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pa] using h a
if pb : b.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pb] using h b
rw [prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq pa pb]
by_contra hab
apply pa.ne_one
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hb0.bot_lt, mul_one]
simpa [Prime.factorization_self pb, Prime.factorization pa, hab] using h b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd (n d : ℕ) :
d ∣ n ↔ ∀ p k : ℕ, Prime p → p ^ k ∣ d → p ^ k ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff, hn, false_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨2, n, prime_two, dvd_zero _, mt (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt) (n.lt_two_pow_self).not_le⟩
refine ⟨fun h p k _ hpkd => dvd_trans hpkd h, ?_⟩
rw [← factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
intro h p pp
simp_rw [← pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
exact h p _ pp (ordProj_dvd _ _)
theorem prod_primeFactors_dvd (n : ℕ) : ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, p ∣ n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp
· simpa [prod_primeFactorsList hn] using (n.primeFactorsList : Multiset ℕ).toFinset_prod_dvd_prod
theorem factorization_gcd {a b : ℕ} (ha_pos : a ≠ 0) (hb_pos : b ≠ 0) :
(gcd a b).factorization = a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization := by
let dfac := a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization
let d := dfac.prod (· ^ ·)
have dfac_prime : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ dfac.support → Prime p := by
intro p hp
have : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList ∧ p ∈ b.primeFactorsList := by simpa [dfac] using hp
exact prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList this.1
have h1 : d.factorization = dfac := prod_pow_factorization_eq_self dfac_prime
have hd_pos : d ≠ 0 := (factorizationEquiv.invFun ⟨dfac, dfac_prime⟩).2.ne'
suffices d = gcd a b by rwa [← this]
| apply gcd_greatest
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos ha_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos hb_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_right
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 381 | 385 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Lu-Ming Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
/-!
# Hadamard product of matrices
This file defines the Hadamard product `Matrix.hadamard`
and contains basic properties about them.
## Main definition
- `Matrix.hadamard`: defines the Hadamard product,
which is the pointwise product of two matrices of the same size.
## Notation
* `⊙`: the Hadamard product `Matrix.hadamard`;
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/hadamard_product_(matrices)>
## Tags
hadamard product, hadamard
-/
variable {α m n R : Type*}
namespace Matrix
/-- `Matrix.hadamard` (denoted as `⊙` within the Matrix namespace) defines the Hadamard product,
which is the pointwise product of two matrices of the same size. -/
def hadamard [Mul α] (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix m n α) : Matrix m n α :=
of fun i j => A i j * B i j
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `hadamard`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem hadamard_apply [Mul α] (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix m n α) (i j) :
hadamard A B i j = A i j * B i j :=
rfl
@[inherit_doc] scoped infixl:100 " ⊙ " => Matrix.hadamard
section BasicProperties
variable (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix m n α)
-- commutativity
theorem hadamard_comm [CommMagma α] : A ⊙ B = B ⊙ A :=
ext fun _ _ => mul_comm _ _
-- associativity
theorem hadamard_assoc [Semigroup α] : A ⊙ B ⊙ C = A ⊙ (B ⊙ C) :=
ext fun _ _ => mul_assoc _ _ _
-- distributivity
theorem hadamard_add [Distrib α] : A ⊙ (B + C) = A ⊙ B + A ⊙ C :=
ext fun _ _ => left_distrib _ _ _
theorem add_hadamard [Distrib α] : (B + C) ⊙ A = B ⊙ A + C ⊙ A :=
ext fun _ _ => right_distrib _ _ _
-- scalar multiplication
section Scalar
@[simp]
theorem smul_hadamard [Mul α] [SMul R α] [IsScalarTower R α α] (k : R) : (k • A) ⊙ B = k • A ⊙ B :=
ext fun _ _ => smul_mul_assoc _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem hadamard_smul [Mul α] [SMul R α] [SMulCommClass R α α] (k : R) : A ⊙ (k • B) = k • A ⊙ B :=
ext fun _ _ => mul_smul_comm _ _ _
end Scalar
section Zero
variable [MulZeroClass α]
@[simp]
theorem hadamard_zero : A ⊙ (0 : Matrix m n α) = 0 :=
ext fun _ _ => mul_zero _
@[simp]
theorem zero_hadamard : (0 : Matrix m n α) ⊙ A = 0 :=
ext fun _ _ => zero_mul _
end Zero
section One
variable [DecidableEq n] [MulZeroOneClass α]
variable (M : Matrix n n α)
theorem hadamard_one : M ⊙ (1 : Matrix n n α) = diagonal fun i => M i i := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j <;> simp [h]
theorem one_hadamard : (1 : Matrix n n α) ⊙ M = diagonal fun i => M i i := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j <;> simp [h]
end One
section stdBasisMatrix
variable [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] [MulZeroClass α]
theorem stdBasisMatrix_hadamard_stdBasisMatrix_eq (i : m) (j : n) (a b : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j a ⊙ stdBasisMatrix i j b = stdBasisMatrix i j (a * b) :=
ext fun _ _ => (apply_ite₂ _ _ _ _ _ _).trans (congr_arg _ <| zero_mul 0)
theorem stdBasisMatrix_hadamard_stdBasisMatrix_of_ne
| {ia : m} {ja : n} {ib : m} {jb : n} (h : ¬(ia = ib ∧ ja = jb)) (a b : α) :
stdBasisMatrix ia ja a ⊙ stdBasisMatrix ib jb b = 0 := by
rw [not_and_or] at h
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Hadamard.lean | 121 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ f ≫ X ◁ inv f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ inv f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ inv f ≫ X ◁ f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
inv f ▷ Z ≫ f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) : X ⊗ Y ≅ X ⊗ Z where
hom := X ◁ f.hom
inv := X ◁ f.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : IsIso (X ◁ f) :=
(whiskerLeftIso X (asIso f)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
inv (X ◁ f) = X ◁ inv f := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_refl (W X : C) :
whiskerLeftIso W (Iso.refl X) = Iso.refl (W ⊗ X) :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_id W X)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_trans (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) :
whiskerLeftIso W (f ≪≫ g) = whiskerLeftIso W f ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso W g :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_comp W f.hom g.hom)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_symm (W : C) {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) :
(whiskerLeftIso W f).symm = whiskerLeftIso W f.symm := rfl
/-- The right whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) : X ⊗ Z ≅ Y ⊗ Z where
hom := f.hom ▷ Z
inv := f.inv ▷ Z
instance whiskerRight_isIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] : IsIso (f ▷ Z) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso f) Z).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] :
inv (f ▷ Z) = inv f ▷ Z := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_refl (X W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (Iso.refl X) W = Iso.refl (X ⊗ W) :=
Iso.ext (id_whiskerRight X W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_trans {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (f ≪≫ g) W = whiskerRightIso f W ≪≫ whiskerRightIso g W :=
Iso.ext (comp_whiskerRight f.hom g.hom W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (W : C) :
(whiskerRightIso f W).symm = whiskerRightIso f.symm W := rfl
/-- The tensor product of two isomorphisms is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def tensorIso {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y)
(g : X' ≅ Y') : X ⊗ X' ≅ Y ⊗ Y' where
hom := f.hom ⊗ g.hom
inv := f.inv ⊗ g.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id, Iso.hom_inv_id, ← tensor_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id, Iso.inv_hom_id, ← tensor_id]
/-- Notation for `tensorIso`, the tensor product of isomorphisms -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => tensorIso
theorem tensorIso_def {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerRightIso f X' ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso Y g :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def f.hom g.hom)
theorem tensorIso_def' {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerLeftIso X g ≪≫ whiskerRightIso f Y' :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def' f.hom g.hom)
instance tensor_isIso {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] : IsIso (f ⊗ g) :=
(asIso f ⊗ asIso g).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] :
inv (f ⊗ g) = inv f ⊗ inv g := by
simp [tensorHom_def ,whisker_exchange]
variable {W X Y Z : C}
theorem whiskerLeft_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
(X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : P → (Y ⟶ Z)) (f' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) :
X ◁ (if h : P then f h else f' h) = if h : P then X ◁ f h else X ◁ f' h := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_whiskerRight {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y : C} (f : P → (X ⟶ Y)) (f' : ¬P → (X ⟶ Y)) (Z : C) :
(if h : P then f h else f' h) ▷ Z = if h : P then f h ▷ Z else f' h ▷ Z := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem tensor_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (f ⊗ if h : P then g h else g' h) =
if h : P then f ⊗ g h else f ⊗ g' h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_tensor {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (if h : P then g h else g' h) ⊗ f =
if h : P then g h ⊗ f else g' h ⊗ f := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_eqToHom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y = Z) :
| X ◁ eqToHom f = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj rfl f) := by
cases f
simp only [whiskerLeft_id, eqToHom_refl]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 425 | 428 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Defs
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Sub
/-!
# Basic theorems about ℒp space
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology ComplexConjugate
variable {α ε ε' E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [ENorm ε] [ENorm ε']
namespace MeasureTheory
section Lp
section Top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ :=
hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_lt_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_ne_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hq0_lt : 0 < q)
(hfq : eLpNorm' f q μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ q ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_rpow_enorm_eq_rpow_eLpNorm' hq0_lt]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hq0_lt) (ne_of_lt hfq)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top' :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hfp : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ := by
apply lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
· exact ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
· simpa [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using hfp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ ↔ ∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖ₑ) ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ :=
⟨lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, by
intro h
have hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
have : 0 < 1 / p.toReal := div_pos zero_lt_one hp'
simpa [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt this) (ne_of_lt h)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-04")] alias
eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top := eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top
end Top
section Zero
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 μ = 1 := by
rw [eLpNorm', div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f 0 μ = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm]
@[simp]
theorem memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} :
MemLp f 0 μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by simp [MemLp, eLpNorm_exponent_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable := memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
section ENormedAddMonoid
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ENormedAddMonoid ε]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero (hp0_lt : 0 < q) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, hp0_lt]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 q with hq0 | hq_neg
· exact eLpNorm'_zero (lt_of_le_of_ne hq0 hq0_ne.symm)
· simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, hq_neg]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_zero : eLpNormEssSup (0 : α → ε) μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup, ← bot_eq_zero', essSup_const_bot]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero : eLpNorm (0 : α → ε) p μ = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp only [h_top, eLpNorm_exponent_top, eLpNormEssSup_zero]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero' : eLpNorm (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ = 0 := eLpNorm_zero
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero : MemLp (0 : α → ε) p μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero, by rw [eLpNorm_zero]; exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero' : MemLp (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.zero' := MemLp.zero'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_memℒp := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_mem_ℒp := MemLp.zero'
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_pos {f : α → ε} (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_pos]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 (0 : Measure α) = 1 := by
simp [eLpNorm']
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_neg {f : α → ε} (hq_neg : q < 0) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = ∞ := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_neg]
end ENormedAddMonoid
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNormEssSup f (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f p (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm', ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
section ContinuousENorm
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ContinuousENorm ε]
@[simp] lemma memLp_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : MemLp f p (0 : Measure α) := by
simp [MemLp]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_measure_zero := memLp_measure_zero
end ContinuousENorm
end Zero
section Neg
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_neg (f : α → F) (q : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm' (-f) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_neg (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm (-f) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top]
lemma eLpNorm_sub_comm (f g : α → E) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
eLpNorm (f - g) p μ = eLpNorm (g - f) p μ := by simp [← eLpNorm_neg (f := f - g)]
theorem MemLp.neg {f : α → E} (hf : MemLp f p μ) : MemLp (-f) p μ :=
⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.neg hf.1, by simp [hf.right]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.neg := MemLp.neg
theorem memLp_neg_iff {f : α → E} : MemLp (-f) p μ ↔ MemLp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, MemLp.neg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_neg_iff := memLp_neg_iff
end Neg
section Const
variable {ε' ε'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε'] [ContinuousENorm ε']
[TopologicalSpace ε''] [ENormedAddMonoid ε'']
theorem eLpNorm'_const (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q)]
congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hq_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hq_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ (ne_of_lt hq_pos).symm]
-- Generalising this to ENormedAddMonoid requires a case analysis whether ‖c‖ₑ = ⊤,
-- and will happen in a future PR.
theorem eLpNorm'_const' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : F) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hq_ne_zero : q ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top _ (measure_ne_top μ Set.univ)]
· congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hp_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hp_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ hq_ne_zero]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, not_or, not_and_or, not_and_or]
simp [hc_ne_zero]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_const (c : ε) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNormEssSup (fun _ : α => c) μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by
rw [eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm, essSup_const _ hμ]
theorem eLpNorm'_const_of_isProbabilityMeasure (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by simp [eLpNorm'_const c hq_pos, measure_univ]
theorem eLpNorm_const (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_const c hμ]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
theorem eLpNorm_const' (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (h_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
-- NB. If ‖c‖ₑ = ∞ and μ is finite, this claim is false: the right has side is true,
-- but the left hand side is false (as the norm is infinite).
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm {c : ε''} (hc' : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ∞)
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
have hp : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp only [hμ, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, or_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top,
eLpNorm_measure_zero]
by_cases hc : c = 0
| · simp only [hc, true_or, eq_self_iff_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top, eLpNorm_zero']
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/Basic.lean | 261 | 261 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Congruence.Defs
/-!
# Congruence relations on rings
This file contains basic results concerning congruence relations on rings,
which extend `Con` and `AddCon` on monoids and additive monoids.
Most of the time you likely want to use the `Ideal.Quotient` API that is built on top of this.
## Main Definitions
* `RingCon R`: the type of congruence relations respecting `+` and `*`.
* `RingConGen r`: the inductively defined smallest ring congruence relation containing a given
binary relation.
## TODO
* Use this for `RingQuot` too.
* Copy across more API from `Con` and `AddCon` in `GroupTheory/Congruence.lean`.
-/
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace RingCon
section Quotient
section Algebraic
/-! ### Scalar multiplication
The operation of scalar multiplication `•` descends naturally to the quotient.
-/
section SMul
variable [Add R] [MulOneClass R]
variable [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
variable [SMul β R] [IsScalarTower β R R]
variable (c : RingCon R)
instance : SMul α c.Quotient := inferInstanceAs (SMul α c.toCon.Quotient)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (a : α) (x : R) : (↑(a • x) : c.Quotient) = a • (x : c.Quotient) :=
rfl
instance [SMulCommClass α β R] : SMulCommClass α β c.Quotient :=
inferInstanceAs (SMulCommClass α β c.toCon.Quotient)
instance [SMul α β] [IsScalarTower α β R] : IsScalarTower α β c.Quotient :=
inferInstanceAs (IsScalarTower α β c.toCon.Quotient)
instance [SMul αᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar α R] : IsCentralScalar α c.Quotient :=
inferInstanceAs (IsCentralScalar α c.toCon.Quotient)
end SMul
instance isScalarTower_right [Add R] [MulOneClass R] [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
(c : RingCon R) : IsScalarTower α c.Quotient c.Quotient where
smul_assoc _ := Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| smul_mul_assoc _ _ _
instance smulCommClass [Add R] [MulOneClass R] [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
[SMulCommClass α R R] (c : RingCon R) : SMulCommClass α c.Quotient c.Quotient where
smul_comm _ := Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| (mul_smul_comm _ _ _).symm
instance smulCommClass' [Add R] [MulOneClass R] [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
[SMulCommClass R α R] (c : RingCon R) : SMulCommClass c.Quotient α c.Quotient :=
haveI := SMulCommClass.symm R α R
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
instance [Monoid α] [NonAssocSemiring R] [DistribMulAction α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
(c : RingCon R) : DistribMulAction α c.Quotient :=
{ c.toCon.mulAction with
smul_zero := fun _ => congr_arg toQuotient <| smul_zero _
smul_add := fun _ => Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg toQuotient <| smul_add _ _ _ }
instance [Monoid α] [Semiring R] [MulSemiringAction α R] [IsScalarTower α R R] (c : RingCon R) :
MulSemiringAction α c.Quotient :=
{ smul_one := fun _ => congr_arg toQuotient <| smul_one _
smul_mul := fun _ => Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg toQuotient <|
MulSemiringAction.smul_mul _ _ _ }
end Algebraic
end Quotient
/-! ### Lattice structure
The API in this section is copied from `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Congruence.lean`
-/
section Lattice
variable [Add R] [Mul R]
/-- For congruence relations `c, d` on a type `M` with multiplication and addition, `c ≤ d` iff
`∀ x y ∈ M`, `x` is related to `y` by `d` if `x` is related to `y` by `c`. -/
instance : LE (RingCon R) where
le c d := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, c x y → d x y
/-- Definition of `≤` for congruence relations. -/
theorem le_def {c d : RingCon R} : c ≤ d ↔ ∀ {x y}, c x y → d x y :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations on a given type with multiplication and
addition. -/
instance : InfSet (RingCon R) where
sInf S :=
{ r := fun x y => ∀ c : RingCon R, c ∈ S → c x y
iseqv :=
⟨fun x c _hc => c.refl x, fun h c hc => c.symm <| h c hc, fun h1 h2 c hc =>
c.trans (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc⟩
add' := fun h1 h2 c hc => c.add (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc
mul' := fun h1 h2 c hc => c.mul (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc }
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations is the same as the infimum of the set's image
under the map to the underlying equivalence relation. -/
theorem sInf_toSetoid (S : Set (RingCon R)) : (sInf S).toSetoid = sInf ((·.toSetoid) '' S) :=
Setoid.ext fun x y =>
⟨fun h r ⟨c, hS, hr⟩ => by rw [← hr]; exact h c hS, fun h c hS => h c.toSetoid ⟨c, hS, rfl⟩⟩
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations is the same as the infimum of the set's image
under the map to the underlying binary relation. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (RingCon R)) : ⇑(sInf S) = sInf ((⇑) '' S) := by
ext; simp only [sInf_image, iInf_apply, iInf_Prop_eq]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → RingCon R) : ⇑(iInf f) = ⨅ i, ⇑(f i) := by
rw [iInf, coe_sInf, ← Set.range_comp, sInf_range, Function.comp_def]
instance : PartialOrder (RingCon R) where
le_refl _c _ _ := id
le_trans _c1 _c2 _c3 h1 h2 _x _y h := h2 <| h1 h
le_antisymm _c _d hc hd := ext fun _x _y => ⟨fun h => hc h, fun h => hd h⟩
/-- The complete lattice of congruence relations on a given type with multiplication and
addition. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (RingCon R) where
__ := completeLatticeOfInf (RingCon R) fun s =>
⟨fun r hr x y h => (h : ∀ r ∈ s, (r : RingCon R) x y) r hr,
fun _r hr _x _y h _r' hr' => hr hr' h⟩
inf c d :=
{ toSetoid := c.toSetoid ⊓ d.toSetoid
mul' := fun h1 h2 => ⟨c.mul h1.1 h2.1, d.mul h1.2 h2.2⟩
add' := fun h1 h2 => ⟨c.add h1.1 h2.1, d.add h1.2 h2.2⟩ }
inf_le_left _ _ := fun _ _ h => h.1
inf_le_right _ _ := fun _ _ h => h.2
le_inf _ _ _ hb hc := fun _ _ h => ⟨hb h, hc h⟩
top :=
{ (⊤ : Setoid R) with
mul' := fun _ _ => trivial
add' := fun _ _ => trivial }
le_top _ := fun _ _ _h => trivial
bot :=
{ (⊥ : Setoid R) with
mul' := congr_arg₂ _
add' := congr_arg₂ _ }
bot_le c := fun x _y h => h ▸ c.refl x
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ⇑(⊤ : RingCon R) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : RingCon R) = Eq := rfl
/-- The infimum of two congruence relations equals the infimum of the underlying binary
operations. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf {c d : RingCon R} : ⇑(c ⊓ d) = ⇑c ⊓ ⇑d := rfl
/-- Definition of the infimum of two congruence relations. -/
theorem inf_iff_and {c d : RingCon R} {x y} : (c ⊓ d) x y ↔ c x y ∧ d x y :=
Iff.rfl
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (RingCon R) where
exists_pair_ne :=
let ⟨x, y, ne⟩ := exists_pair_ne R
⟨⊥, ⊤, ne_of_apply_ne (· x y) <| by simp [ne]⟩
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton (RingCon R) where
allEq c c' := ext fun r r' ↦ by simp_rw [Subsingleton.elim r' r, c.refl, c'.refl]
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial (RingCon R) ↔ Nontrivial R := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
on_goal 1 => simp_rw [← not_subsingleton_iff_nontrivial, not_iff_not]
all_goals exact iff_of_true inferInstance ‹_›
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton (RingCon R) ↔ Subsingleton R := by
simp_rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, nontrivial_iff]
/-- The inductively defined smallest congruence relation containing a binary relation `r` equals
the infimum of the set of congruence relations containing `r`. -/
theorem ringConGen_eq (r : R → R → Prop) :
ringConGen r = sInf {s : RingCon R | ∀ x y, r x y → s x y} :=
le_antisymm
(fun _x _y H =>
RingConGen.Rel.recOn H (fun _ _ h _ hs => hs _ _ h) (RingCon.refl _)
(fun _ => RingCon.symm _) (fun _ _ => RingCon.trans _)
(fun _ _ h1 h2 c hc => c.add (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc)
(fun _ _ h1 h2 c hc => c.mul (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc))
(sInf_le fun _ _ => RingConGen.Rel.of _ _)
/-- The smallest congruence relation containing a binary relation `r` is contained in any
congruence relation containing `r`. -/
theorem ringConGen_le {r : R → R → Prop} {c : RingCon R}
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → c x y) : ringConGen r ≤ c := by
rw [ringConGen_eq]; exact sInf_le h
/-- Given binary relations `r, s` with `r` contained in `s`, the smallest congruence relation
containing `s` contains the smallest congruence relation containing `r`. -/
theorem ringConGen_mono {r s : R → R → Prop} (h : ∀ x y, r x y → s x y) :
ringConGen r ≤ ringConGen s :=
ringConGen_le fun x y hr => RingConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| h x y hr
/-- Congruence relations equal the smallest congruence relation in which they are contained. -/
theorem ringConGen_of_ringCon (c : RingCon R) : ringConGen c = c :=
le_antisymm (by rw [ringConGen_eq]; exact sInf_le fun _ _ => id) RingConGen.Rel.of
/-- The map sending a binary relation to the smallest congruence relation in which it is
contained is idempotent. -/
theorem ringConGen_idem (r : R → R → Prop) : ringConGen (ringConGen r) = ringConGen r :=
ringConGen_of_ringCon _
/-- The supremum of congruence relations `c, d` equals the smallest congruence relation containing
the binary relation '`x` is related to `y` by `c` or `d`'. -/
theorem sup_eq_ringConGen (c d : RingCon R) : c ⊔ d = ringConGen fun x y => c x y ∨ d x y := by
rw [ringConGen_eq]
apply congr_arg sInf
simp only [le_def, or_imp, ← forall_and]
/-- The supremum of two congruence relations equals the smallest congruence relation containing
the supremum of the underlying binary operations. -/
theorem sup_def {c d : RingCon R} : c ⊔ d = ringConGen (⇑c ⊔ ⇑d) := by
rw [sup_eq_ringConGen]; rfl
/-- The supremum of a set of congruence relations `S` equals the smallest congruence relation
containing the binary relation 'there exists `c ∈ S` such that `x` is related to `y` by
`c`'. -/
theorem sSup_eq_ringConGen (S : Set (RingCon R)) :
sSup S = ringConGen fun x y => ∃ c : RingCon R, c ∈ S ∧ c x y := by
rw [ringConGen_eq]
apply congr_arg sInf
ext
exact ⟨fun h _ _ ⟨r, hr⟩ => h hr.1 hr.2, fun h r hS _ _ hr => h _ _ ⟨r, hS, hr⟩⟩
/-- The supremum of a set of congruence relations is the same as the smallest congruence relation
containing the supremum of the set's image under the map to the underlying binary relation. -/
theorem sSup_def {S : Set (RingCon R)} :
sSup S = ringConGen (sSup (@Set.image (RingCon R) (R → R → Prop) (⇑) S)) := by
rw [sSup_eq_ringConGen, sSup_image]
congr with (x y)
simp only [sSup_image, iSup_apply, iSup_Prop_eq, exists_prop, rel_eq_coe]
variable (R)
/-- There is a Galois insertion of congruence relations on a type with multiplication and addition
`R` into binary relations on `R`. -/
protected def gi : @GaloisInsertion (R → R → Prop) (RingCon R) _ _ ringConGen (⇑) where
choice r _h := ringConGen r
gc _r c :=
⟨fun H _ _ h => H <| RingConGen.Rel.of _ _ h, fun H =>
ringConGen_of_ringCon c ▸ ringConGen_mono H⟩
le_l_u x := (ringConGen_of_ringCon x).symm ▸ le_refl x
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
end Lattice
end RingCon
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Congruence/Basic.lean | 582 | 587 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Fold
/-!
# Down-compressions
This file defines down-compression.
Down-compressing `𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)` along `a : α` means removing `a` from the elements of `𝒜`,
when the resulting set is not already in `𝒜`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.nonMemberSubfamily`: `𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a` is the subfamily of sets not containing
`a`.
* `Finset.memberSubfamily`: `𝒜.memberSubfamily a` is the image of the subfamily of sets containing
`a` under removing `a`.
* `Down.compression`: Down-compression.
## Notation
`𝓓 a 𝒜` is notation for `Down.compress a 𝒜` in locale `SetFamily`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
compression, down-compression
-/
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {s : Finset α} {a : α}
namespace Finset
/-- Elements of `𝒜` that do not contain `a`. -/
def nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) := {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∉ s}
/-- Image of the elements of `𝒜` which contain `a` under removing `a`. Finsets that do not contain
`a` such that `insert a s ∈ 𝒜`. -/
def memberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) :=
{s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s}.image fun s => erase s a
@[simp]
theorem mem_nonMemberSubfamily : s ∈ 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ↔ s ∈ 𝒜 ∧ a ∉ s := by
simp [nonMemberSubfamily]
@[simp]
theorem mem_memberSubfamily : s ∈ 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ↔ insert a s ∈ 𝒜 ∧ a ∉ s := by
simp_rw [memberSubfamily, mem_image, mem_filter]
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨insert a s, ⟨h.1, by simp⟩, erase_insert h.2⟩⟩
rintro ⟨s, ⟨hs1, hs2⟩, rfl⟩
rw [insert_erase hs2]
exact ⟨hs1, not_mem_erase _ _⟩
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_inter (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∩ ℬ).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ∩ ℬ.nonMemberSubfamily a :=
filter_inter_distrib _ _ _
theorem memberSubfamily_inter (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∩ ℬ).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∩ ℬ.memberSubfamily a := by
unfold memberSubfamily
rw [filter_inter_distrib, image_inter_of_injOn _ _ ((erase_injOn' _).mono _)]
simp
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_union (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∪ ℬ).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ∪ ℬ.nonMemberSubfamily a :=
filter_union _ _ _
theorem memberSubfamily_union (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∪ ℬ).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∪ ℬ.memberSubfamily a := by
simp_rw [memberSubfamily, filter_union, image_union]
theorem card_memberSubfamily_add_card_nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) :
#(𝒜.memberSubfamily a) + #(𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a) = #𝒜 := by
rw [memberSubfamily, nonMemberSubfamily, card_image_of_injOn]
· conv_rhs => rw [← filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card (fun s => (a ∈ s))]
· apply (erase_injOn' _).mono
simp
theorem memberSubfamily_union_nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) :
𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∪ 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.image fun s => s.erase a := by
ext s
simp only [mem_union, mem_memberSubfamily, mem_nonMemberSubfamily, mem_image, exists_prop]
constructor
· rintro (h | h)
· exact ⟨_, h.1, erase_insert h.2⟩
· exact ⟨_, h.1, erase_eq_of_not_mem h.2⟩
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· exact Or.inl ⟨by rwa [insert_erase ha], not_mem_erase _ _⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨by rwa [erase_eq_of_not_mem ha], not_mem_erase _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem memberSubfamily_memberSubfamily : (𝒜.memberSubfamily a).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem memberSubfamily_nonMemberSubfamily : (𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_memberSubfamily :
(𝒜.memberSubfamily a).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_nonMemberSubfamily :
(𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a := by
ext
simp
lemma memberSubfamily_image_insert (h𝒜 : ∀ s ∈ 𝒜, a ∉ s) :
(𝒜.image <| insert a).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜 := by
ext s
simp only [mem_memberSubfamily, mem_image]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ ⟨⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, h𝒜 _ hs⟩⟩
rintro ⟨⟨t, ht, hts⟩, hs⟩
rwa [← insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn (h𝒜 _ ht) hs hts]
@[simp] lemma nonMemberSubfamily_image_insert : (𝒜.image <| insert a).nonMemberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] lemma memberSubfamily_image_erase : (𝒜.image (erase · a)).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
(ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' (mem_insert_self _ _) (not_mem_erase _ _)).symm]
lemma image_insert_memberSubfamily (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (a : α) :
(𝒜.memberSubfamily a).image (insert a) = {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s} := by
ext s
simp only [mem_memberSubfamily, mem_image, mem_filter]
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨hs, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨erase s a, ⟨?_, not_mem_erase _ _⟩, insert_erase ha⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨hs, -⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨hs, mem_insert_self _ _⟩
· rwa [insert_erase ha]
/-- Induction principle for finset families. To prove a statement for every finset family,
it suffices to prove it for
* the empty finset family.
* the finset family which only contains the empty finset.
* `ℬ ∪ {s ∪ {a} | s ∈ 𝒞}` assuming the property for `ℬ` and `𝒞`, where `a` is an element of the
ground type and `𝒜` and `ℬ` are families of finsets not containing `a`.
Note that instead of giving `ℬ` and `𝒞`, the `subfamily` case gives you
`𝒜 = ℬ ∪ {s ∪ {a} | s ∈ 𝒞}`, so that `ℬ = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily` and `𝒞 = 𝒜.memberSubfamily`.
This is a way of formalising induction on `n` where `𝒜` is a finset family on `n` elements.
See also `Finset.family_induction_on.` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
lemma memberFamily_induction_on {p : Finset (Finset α) → Prop}
(𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (empty : p ∅) (singleton_empty : p {∅})
(subfamily : ∀ (a : α) ⦃𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)⦄,
p (𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a) → p (𝒜.memberSubfamily a) → p 𝒜) : p 𝒜 := by
set u := 𝒜.sup id
have hu : ∀ s ∈ 𝒜, s ⊆ u := fun s ↦ le_sup (f := id)
clear_value u
induction u using Finset.induction generalizing 𝒜 with
| empty =>
simp_rw [subset_empty] at hu
rw [← subset_singleton_iff', subset_singleton_iff] at hu
obtain rfl | rfl := hu <;> assumption
| insert a u _ ih =>
refine subfamily a (ih _ ?_) (ih _ ?_)
· simp only [mem_nonMemberSubfamily, and_imp]
exact fun s hs has ↦ (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem has).1 <| hu _ hs
· simp only [mem_memberSubfamily, and_imp]
exact fun s hs ha ↦ (insert_subset_insert_iff ha).1 <| hu _ hs
/-- Induction principle for finset families. To prove a statement for every finset family,
it suffices to prove it for
* the empty finset family.
* the finset family which only contains the empty finset.
* `{s ∪ {a} | s ∈ 𝒜}` assuming the property for `𝒜` a family of finsets not containing `a`.
* `ℬ ∪ 𝒞` assuming the property for `ℬ` and `𝒞`, where `a` is an element of the ground type and
`ℬ`is a family of finsets not containing `a` and `𝒞` a family of finsets containing `a`.
Note that instead of giving `ℬ` and `𝒞`, the `subfamily` case gives you `𝒜 = ℬ ∪ 𝒞`, so that
`ℬ = {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∉ s}` and `𝒞 = {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s}`.
This is a way of formalising induction on `n` where `𝒜` is a finset family on `n` elements.
See also `Finset.memberFamily_induction_on.` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected lemma family_induction_on {p : Finset (Finset α) → Prop}
(𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (empty : p ∅) (singleton_empty : p {∅})
(image_insert : ∀ (a : α) ⦃𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)⦄,
(∀ s ∈ 𝒜, a ∉ s) → p 𝒜 → p (𝒜.image <| insert a))
(subfamily : ∀ (a : α) ⦃𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)⦄,
p {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∉ s} → p {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s} → p 𝒜) : p 𝒜 := by
refine memberFamily_induction_on 𝒜 empty singleton_empty fun a 𝒜 h𝒜₀ h𝒜₁ ↦ subfamily a h𝒜₀ ?_
rw [← image_insert_memberSubfamily]
exact image_insert _ (by simp) h𝒜₁
end Finset
open Finset
-- The namespace is here to distinguish from other compressions.
namespace Down
/-- `a`-down-compressing `𝒜` means removing `a` from the elements of `𝒜` that contain it, when the
resulting Finset is not already in `𝒜`. -/
def compression (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) :=
{s ∈ 𝒜 | erase s a ∈ 𝒜}.disjUnion {s ∈ 𝒜.image fun s ↦ erase s a | s ∉ 𝒜} <|
disjoint_left.2 fun _s h₁ h₂ ↦ (mem_filter.1 h₂).2 (mem_filter.1 h₁).1
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] notation "𝓓 " => Down.compression
open FinsetFamily
/-- `a` is in the down-compressed family iff it's in the original and its compression is in the
original, or it's not in the original but it's the compression of something in the original. -/
theorem mem_compression : s ∈ 𝓓 a 𝒜 ↔ s ∈ 𝒜 ∧ s.erase a ∈ 𝒜 ∨ s ∉ 𝒜 ∧ insert a s ∈ 𝒜 := by
simp_rw [compression, mem_disjUnion, mem_filter, mem_image, and_comm (a := (¬ s ∈ 𝒜))]
refine
or_congr_right
(and_congr_left fun hs =>
⟨?_, fun h => ⟨_, h, erase_insert <| insert_ne_self.1 <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h hs⟩⟩)
rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
rwa [insert_erase (erase_ne_self.1 (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem ht hs).symm)]
theorem erase_mem_compression (hs : s ∈ 𝒜) : s.erase a ∈ 𝓓 a 𝒜 := by
simp_rw [mem_compression, erase_idem, and_self_iff]
refine (em _).imp_right fun h => ⟨h, ?_⟩
rwa [insert_erase (erase_ne_self.1 (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hs h).symm)]
-- This is a special case of `erase_mem_compression` once we have `compression_idem`.
theorem erase_mem_compression_of_mem_compression : s ∈ 𝓓 a 𝒜 → s.erase a ∈ 𝓓 a 𝒜 := by
simp_rw [mem_compression, erase_idem]
refine Or.imp (fun h => ⟨h.2, h.2⟩) fun h => ?_
rwa [erase_eq_of_not_mem (insert_ne_self.1 <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h.2 h.1)]
theorem mem_compression_of_insert_mem_compression (h : insert a s ∈ 𝓓 a 𝒜) : s ∈ 𝓓 a 𝒜 := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· rwa [insert_eq_of_mem ha] at h
· rw [← erase_insert ha]
exact erase_mem_compression_of_mem_compression h
/-- Down-compressing a family is idempotent. -/
@[simp]
theorem compression_idem (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : 𝓓 a (𝓓 a 𝒜) = 𝓓 a 𝒜 := by
ext s
refine mem_compression.trans ⟨?_, fun h => Or.inl ⟨h, erase_mem_compression_of_mem_compression h⟩⟩
rintro (h | h)
· exact h.1
· cases h.1 (mem_compression_of_insert_mem_compression h.2)
/-- Down-compressing a family doesn't change its size. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_compression (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : #(𝓓 a 𝒜) = #𝒜 := by
rw [compression, card_disjUnion, filter_image,
card_image_of_injOn ((erase_injOn' _).mono fun s hs => _), ← card_union_of_disjoint]
· conv_rhs => rw [← filter_union_filter_neg_eq (fun s => (erase s a ∈ 𝒜)) 𝒜]
| · exact disjoint_filter_filter_neg 𝒜 𝒜 (fun s => (erase s a ∈ 𝒜))
intro s hs
rw [mem_coe, mem_filter] at hs
exact not_imp_comm.1 erase_eq_of_not_mem (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hs.1 hs.2).symm
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/Down.lean | 264 | 268 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.StdBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraTower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Linear maps and matrices
This file defines the maps to send matrices to a linear map,
and to send linear maps between modules with a finite bases
to matrices. This defines a linear equivalence between linear maps
between finite-dimensional vector spaces and matrices indexed by
the respective bases.
## Main definitions
In the list below, and in all this file, `R` is a commutative ring (semiring
is sometimes enough), `M` and its variations are `R`-modules, `ι`, `κ`, `n` and `m` are finite
types used for indexing.
* `LinearMap.toMatrix`: given bases `v₁ : ι → M₁` and `v₂ : κ → M₂`,
the `R`-linear equivalence from `M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂` to `Matrix κ ι R`
* `Matrix.toLin`: the inverse of `LinearMap.toMatrix`
* `LinearMap.toMatrix'`: the `R`-linear equivalence from `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`
to `Matrix m n R` (with the standard basis on `m → R` and `n → R`)
* `Matrix.toLin'`: the inverse of `LinearMap.toMatrix'`
* `algEquivMatrix`: given a basis indexed by `n`, the `R`-algebra equivalence between
`R`-endomorphisms of `M` and `Matrix n n R`
## Issues
This file was originally written without attention to non-commutative rings,
and so mostly only works in the commutative setting. This should be fixed.
In particular, `Matrix.mulVec` gives us a linear equivalence
`Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R)`
while `Matrix.vecMul` gives us a linear equivalence
`Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`.
At present, the first equivalence is developed in detail but only for commutative rings
(and we omit the distinction between `Rᵐᵒᵖ` and `R`),
while the second equivalence is developed only in brief, but for not-necessarily-commutative rings.
Naming is slightly inconsistent between the two developments.
In the original (commutative) development `linear` is abbreviated to `lin`,
although this is not consistent with the rest of mathlib.
In the new (non-commutative) development `linear` is not abbreviated, and declarations use `_right`
to indicate they use the right action of matrices on vectors (via `Matrix.vecMul`).
When the two developments are made uniform, the names should be made uniform, too,
by choosing between `linear` and `lin` consistently,
and (presumably) adding `_left` where necessary.
## Tags
linear_map, matrix, linear_equiv, diagonal, det, trace
-/
noncomputable section
open LinearMap Matrix Set Submodule
section ToMatrixRight
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*}
/-- `Matrix.vecMul M` is a linear map. -/
def Matrix.vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) : (m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R where
toFun x := x ᵥ* M
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ add_dotProduct _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ smul_dotProduct _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) (x : m → R) :
M.vecMulLinear x = x ᵥ* M := rfl
theorem Matrix.coe_vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) :
(M.vecMulLinear : _ → _) = M.vecMul := rfl
variable [Fintype m]
theorem range_vecMulLinear (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range M.vecMulLinear = span R (range M.row) := by
letI := Classical.decEq m
simp_rw [range_eq_map, ← iSup_range_single, Submodule.map_iSup, range_eq_map, ←
Ideal.span_singleton_one, Ideal.span, Submodule.map_span, image_image, image_singleton,
Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply, iSup_span, range_eq_iUnion, iUnion_singleton_eq_range,
LinearMap.single, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, row_def]
unfold vecMul
simp_rw [single_dotProduct, one_mul]
theorem Matrix.vecMul_injective_iff {R : Type*} [Ring R] {M : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Injective M.vecMul ↔ LinearIndependent R M.row := by
rw [← coe_vecMulLinear]
simp only [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, Fintype.linearIndependent_iff, Submodule.eq_bot_iff,
LinearMap.mem_ker, vecMulLinear_apply, row_def]
refine ⟨fun h c h0 ↦ congr_fun <| h c ?_, fun h c h0 ↦ funext <| h c ?_⟩
· rw [← h0]
ext i
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
· rw [← h0]
| ext j
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
lemma Matrix.linearIndependent_rows_of_isUnit {R : Type*} [Ring R] {A : Matrix m m R}
[DecidableEq m] (ha : IsUnit A) : LinearIndependent R A.row := by
rw [← Matrix.vecMul_injective_iff]
exact Matrix.vecMul_injective_of_isUnit ha
section
variable [DecidableEq m]
/-- Linear maps `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)` are linearly equivalent over `Rᵐᵒᵖ` to `Matrix m n R`,
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/ToLin.lean | 112 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.Egorov
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Complete
/-!
# Convergence in measure
We define convergence in measure which is one of the many notions of convergence in probability.
A sequence of functions `f` is said to converge in measure to some function `g`
if for all `ε > 0`, the measure of the set `{x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x)}` tends to 0 as `i`
converges along some given filter `l`.
Convergence in measure is most notably used in the formulation of the weak law of large numbers
and is also useful in theorems such as the Vitali convergence theorem. This file provides some
basic lemmas for working with convergence in measure and establishes some relations between
convergence in measure and other notions of convergence.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.TendstoInMeasure (μ : Measure α) (f : ι → α → E) (g : α → E)`: `f` converges
in `μ`-measure to `g`.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_ae`: convergence almost everywhere in a finite
measure space implies convergence in measure.
* `MeasureTheory.TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae`: if `f` is a sequence of functions
which converges in measure to `g`, then `f` has a subsequence which convergence almost
everywhere to `g`.
* `MeasureTheory.exists_seq_tendstoInMeasure_atTop_iff`: for a sequence of functions `f`,
convergence in measure is equivalent to the fact that every subsequence has another subsequence
that converges almost surely.
* `MeasureTheory.tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_eLpNorm`: convergence in Lp implies convergence
in measure.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α ι κ E : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- A sequence of functions `f` is said to converge in measure to some function `g` if for all
`ε > 0`, the measure of the set `{x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x)}` tends to 0 as `i` converges along
some given filter `l`. -/
def TendstoInMeasure [Dist E] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : ι → α → E) (l : Filter ι)
(g : α → E) : Prop :=
∀ ε, 0 < ε → Tendsto (fun i => μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) }) l (𝓝 0)
theorem tendstoInMeasure_iff_norm [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → α → E}
{g : α → E} :
TendstoInMeasure μ f l g ↔
∀ ε, 0 < ε → Tendsto (fun i => μ { x | ε ≤ ‖f i x - g x‖ }) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp_rw [TendstoInMeasure, dist_eq_norm]
theorem tendstoInMeasure_iff_tendsto_toNNReal [Dist E] [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{f : ι → α → E} {l : Filter ι} {g : α → E} :
TendstoInMeasure μ f l g ↔
∀ ε, 0 < ε → Tendsto (fun i => (μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) }).toNNReal) l (𝓝 0) := by
have hfin ε i : μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) } ≠ ⊤ :=
measure_ne_top μ {x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x)}
refine ⟨fun h ε hε ↦ ?_, fun h ε hε ↦ ?_⟩
· have hf : (fun i => (μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) }).toNNReal) =
ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ (fun i => (μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) })) := rfl
rw [hf, ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal_iff' (hfin ε)]
exact h ε hε
· rw [← ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal_iff ENNReal.zero_ne_top (hfin ε)]
exact h ε hε
lemma TendstoInMeasure.mono [Dist E] {f : ι → α → E} {g : α → E} {u v : Filter ι} (huv : v ≤ u)
(hg : TendstoInMeasure μ f u g) : TendstoInMeasure μ f v g :=
fun ε hε => (hg ε hε).mono_left huv
lemma TendstoInMeasure.comp [Dist E] {f : ι → α → E} {g : α → E} {u : Filter ι}
{v : Filter κ} {ns : κ → ι} (hg : TendstoInMeasure μ f u g) (hns : Tendsto ns v u) :
TendstoInMeasure μ (f ∘ ns) v g := fun ε hε ↦ (hg ε hε).comp hns
namespace TendstoInMeasure
variable [Dist E] {l : Filter ι} {f f' : ι → α → E} {g g' : α → E}
protected theorem congr' (h_left : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i =ᵐ[μ] f' i) (h_right : g =ᵐ[μ] g')
(h_tendsto : TendstoInMeasure μ f l g) : TendstoInMeasure μ f' l g' := by
intro ε hε
suffices
(fun i => μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f' i x) (g' x) }) =ᶠ[l] fun i => μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) } by
rw [tendsto_congr' this]
exact h_tendsto ε hε
filter_upwards [h_left] with i h_ae_eq
refine measure_congr ?_
filter_upwards [h_ae_eq, h_right] with x hxf hxg
rw [eq_iff_iff]
change ε ≤ dist (f' i x) (g' x) ↔ ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x)
rw [hxg, hxf]
protected theorem congr (h_left : ∀ i, f i =ᵐ[μ] f' i) (h_right : g =ᵐ[μ] g')
(h_tendsto : TendstoInMeasure μ f l g) : TendstoInMeasure μ f' l g' :=
TendstoInMeasure.congr' (Eventually.of_forall h_left) h_right h_tendsto
| theorem congr_left (h : ∀ i, f i =ᵐ[μ] f' i) (h_tendsto : TendstoInMeasure μ f l g) :
TendstoInMeasure μ f' l g :=
h_tendsto.congr h EventuallyEq.rfl
theorem congr_right (h : g =ᵐ[μ] g') (h_tendsto : TendstoInMeasure μ f l g) :
TendstoInMeasure μ f l g' :=
h_tendsto.congr (fun _ => EventuallyEq.rfl) h
end TendstoInMeasure
section ExistsSeqTendstoAe
variable [MetricSpace E]
variable {f : ℕ → α → E} {g : α → E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_ae`. -/
theorem tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_ae_of_stronglyMeasurable [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConvergenceInMeasure.lean | 107 | 124 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L1Space.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Complete
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Indicator
/-!
# Density of simple functions
Show that each `Lᵖ` Borel measurable function can be approximated in `Lᵖ` norm
by a sequence of simple functions.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Lp.simpleFunc`, the type of `Lp` simple functions
* `coeToLp`, the embedding of `Lp.simpleFunc E p μ` into `Lp E p μ`
## Main results
* `tendsto_approxOn_Lp_eLpNorm` (Lᵖ convergence): If `E` is a `NormedAddCommGroup` and `f` is
measurable and `MemLp` (for `p < ∞`), then the simple functions
`SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf s 0 h₀ n` may be considered as elements of `Lp E p μ`, and they tend
in Lᵖ to `f`.
* `Lp.simpleFunc.isDenseEmbedding`: the embedding `coeToLp` of the `Lp` simple functions into
`Lp` is dense.
* `Lp.simpleFunc.induction`, `Lp.induction`, `MemLp.induction`, `Integrable.induction`: to prove
a predicate for all elements of one of these classes of functions, it suffices to check that it
behaves correctly on simple functions.
## TODO
For `E` finite-dimensional, simple functions `α →ₛ E` are dense in L^∞ -- prove this.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ β` (local notation): the type of simple functions `α → β`.
* `α →₁ₛ[μ] E`: the type of `L1` simple functions `α → β`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric Finset
open scoped Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory
variable {α β ι E F 𝕜 : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
/-! ### Lp approximation by simple functions -/
section Lp
variable [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace E] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
{q : ℝ} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
theorem nnnorm_approxOn_le [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set E}
{y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (x : β) (n : ℕ) :
‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - f x‖₊ ≤ ‖f x - y₀‖₊ := by
have := edist_approxOn_le hf h₀ x n
rw [edist_comm y₀] at this
simp only [edist_nndist, nndist_eq_nnnorm] at this
exact mod_cast this
theorem norm_approxOn_y₀_le [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set E}
{y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (x : β) (n : ℕ) :
‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - y₀‖ ≤ ‖f x - y₀‖ + ‖f x - y₀‖ := by
simpa [enorm, edist_eq_enorm_sub, ← ENNReal.coe_add, norm_sub_rev]
using edist_approxOn_y0_le hf h₀ x n
theorem norm_approxOn_zero_le [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set E}
(h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (x : β) (n : ℕ) :
‖approxOn f hf s 0 h₀ n x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖ + ‖f x‖ := by
simpa [enorm, edist_eq_enorm_sub, ← ENNReal.coe_add, norm_sub_rev]
using edist_approxOn_y0_le hf h₀ x n
theorem tendsto_approxOn_Lp_eLpNorm [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f)
{s : Set E} {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {μ : Measure β}
(hμ : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closure s) (hi : eLpNorm (fun x => f x - y₀) p μ < ∞) :
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (⇑(approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n) - f) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· simpa only [hp_zero, eLpNorm_exponent_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds
have hp : 0 < p.toReal := toReal_pos hp_zero hp_ne_top
suffices Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, ‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - f x‖ₑ ^ p.toReal ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 0) by
simp only [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_zero hp_ne_top]
convert continuous_rpow_const.continuousAt.tendsto.comp this
simp [zero_rpow_of_pos (_root_.inv_pos.mpr hp)]
-- We simply check the conditions of the Dominated Convergence Theorem:
-- (1) The function "`p`-th power of distance between `f` and the approximation" is measurable
have hF_meas n : Measurable fun x => ‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - f x‖ₑ ^ p.toReal := by
simpa only [← edist_eq_enorm_sub] using
(approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n).measurable_bind (fun y x => edist y (f x) ^ p.toReal) fun y =>
(measurable_edist_right.comp hf).pow_const p.toReal
-- (2) The functions "`p`-th power of distance between `f` and the approximation" are uniformly
-- bounded, at any given point, by `fun x => ‖f x - y₀‖ ^ p.toReal`
have h_bound n :
(fun x ↦ ‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - f x‖ₑ ^ p.toReal) ≤ᵐ[μ] (‖f · - y₀‖ₑ ^ p.toReal) :=
.of_forall fun x => rpow_le_rpow (coe_mono (nnnorm_approxOn_le hf h₀ x n)) toReal_nonneg
-- (3) The bounding function `fun x => ‖f x - y₀‖ ^ p.toReal` has finite integral
have h_fin : (∫⁻ a : β, ‖f a - y₀‖ₑ ^ p.toReal ∂μ) ≠ ⊤ :=
(lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top hp_zero hp_ne_top hi).ne
-- (4) The functions "`p`-th power of distance between `f` and the approximation" tend pointwise
-- to zero
have h_lim :
∀ᵐ a : β ∂μ, Tendsto (‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ · a - f a‖ₑ ^ p.toReal) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
filter_upwards [hμ] with a ha
have : Tendsto (fun n => (approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n) a - f a) atTop (𝓝 (f a - f a)) :=
(tendsto_approxOn hf h₀ ha).sub tendsto_const_nhds
convert continuous_rpow_const.continuousAt.tendsto.comp (tendsto_coe.mpr this.nnnorm)
simp [zero_rpow_of_pos hp]
-- Then we apply the Dominated Convergence Theorem
simpa using tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence _ hF_meas h_bound h_fin h_lim
theorem memLp_approxOn [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f)
(hf : MemLp f p μ) {s : Set E} {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s]
(hi₀ : MemLp (fun _ => y₀) p μ) (n : ℕ) : MemLp (approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n) p μ := by
refine ⟨(approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n).aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
suffices eLpNorm (fun x => approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n x - y₀) p μ < ⊤ by
have : MemLp (fun x => approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n x - y₀) p μ :=
⟨(approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n - const β y₀).aestronglyMeasurable, this⟩
convert eLpNorm_add_lt_top this hi₀
ext x
simp
have hf' : MemLp (fun x => ‖f x - y₀‖) p μ := by
have h_meas : Measurable fun x => ‖f x - y₀‖ := by
simp only [← dist_eq_norm]
exact (continuous_id.dist continuous_const).measurable.comp fmeas
refine ⟨h_meas.aemeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [eLpNorm_norm]
convert eLpNorm_add_lt_top hf hi₀.neg with x
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n x - y₀‖ ≤ ‖‖f x - y₀‖ + ‖f x - y₀‖‖ := by
filter_upwards with x
convert norm_approxOn_y₀_le fmeas h₀ x n using 1
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg]
positivity
calc
eLpNorm (fun x => approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n x - y₀) p μ ≤
eLpNorm (fun x => ‖f x - y₀‖ + ‖f x - y₀‖) p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_ae this
_ < ⊤ := eLpNorm_add_lt_top hf' hf'
theorem tendsto_approxOn_range_Lp_eLpNorm [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞)
{μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f) [SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)]
(hf : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞) :
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (⇑(approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n) - f) p μ)
atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_approxOn_Lp_eLpNorm fmeas _ hp_ne_top ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards with x using subset_closure (by simp)
· simpa using hf
theorem memLp_approxOn_range [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f)
[SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)] (hf : MemLp f p μ) (n : ℕ) :
MemLp (approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n) p μ :=
memLp_approxOn fmeas hf (y₀ := 0) (by simp) MemLp.zero n
theorem tendsto_approxOn_range_Lp [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞)
{μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f) [SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)]
(hf : MemLp f p μ) :
Tendsto
(fun n =>
(memLp_approxOn_range fmeas hf n).toLp (approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n))
atTop (𝓝 (hf.toLp f)) := by
simpa only [Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_eLpNorm''] using
tendsto_approxOn_range_Lp_eLpNorm hp_ne_top fmeas hf.2
/-- Any function in `ℒp` can be approximated by a simple function if `p < ∞`. -/
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.MemLp.exists_simpleFunc_eLpNorm_sub_lt {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ g : β →ₛ E, eLpNorm (f - ⇑g) p μ < ε ∧ MemLp g p μ := by
borelize E
let f' := hf.1.mk f
rsuffices ⟨g, hg, g_mem⟩ : ∃ g : β →ₛ E, eLpNorm (f' - ⇑g) p μ < ε ∧ MemLp g p μ
· refine ⟨g, ?_, g_mem⟩
suffices eLpNorm (f - ⇑g) p μ = eLpNorm (f' - ⇑g) p μ by rwa [this]
apply eLpNorm_congr_ae
filter_upwards [hf.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx
simpa only [Pi.sub_apply, sub_left_inj] using hx
have hf' : MemLp f' p μ := hf.ae_eq hf.1.ae_eq_mk
have f'meas : Measurable f' := hf.1.measurable_mk
have : SeparableSpace (range f' ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
StronglyMeasurable.separableSpace_range_union_singleton hf.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk
rcases ((tendsto_approxOn_range_Lp_eLpNorm hp_ne_top f'meas hf'.2).eventually <|
gt_mem_nhds hε.bot_lt).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
rw [← eLpNorm_neg, neg_sub] at hn
exact ⟨_, hn, memLp_approxOn_range f'meas hf' _⟩
end Lp
/-! ### L1 approximation by simple functions -/
section Integrable
variable [MeasurableSpace β]
variable [MeasurableSpace E] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem tendsto_approxOn_L1_enorm [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f)
{s : Set E} {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] {μ : Measure β}
(hμ : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closure s) (hi : HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => f x - y₀) μ) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, ‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa [eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm] using
tendsto_approxOn_Lp_eLpNorm hf h₀ one_ne_top hμ
(by simpa [eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm] using hi)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias tendsto_approxOn_L1_nnnorm := tendsto_approxOn_L1_enorm
theorem integrable_approxOn [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f)
(hf : Integrable f μ) {s : Set E} {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s]
(hi₀ : Integrable (fun _ => y₀) μ) (n : ℕ) : Integrable (approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n) μ := by
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hf hi₀ ⊢
exact memLp_approxOn fmeas hf h₀ hi₀ n
theorem tendsto_approxOn_range_L1_enorm [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β}
[SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)] (fmeas : Measurable f) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, ‖approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n x - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) atTop
(𝓝 0) := by
apply tendsto_approxOn_L1_enorm fmeas
· filter_upwards with x using subset_closure (by simp)
· simpa using hf.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias tendsto_approxOn_range_L1_nnnorm := tendsto_approxOn_range_L1_enorm
theorem integrable_approxOn_range [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f)
[SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)] (hf : Integrable f μ) (n : ℕ) :
Integrable (approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n) μ :=
integrable_approxOn fmeas hf _ (integrable_zero _ _ _) n
end Integrable
section SimpleFuncProperties
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
variable {μ : Measure α} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
/-!
### Properties of simple functions in `Lp` spaces
A simple function `f : α →ₛ E` into a normed group `E` verifies, for a measure `μ`:
- `MemLp f 0 μ` and `MemLp f ∞ μ`, since `f` is a.e.-measurable and bounded,
- for `0 < p < ∞`,
`MemLp f p μ ↔ Integrable f μ ↔ f.FinMeasSupp μ ↔ ∀ y, y ≠ 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' {y}) < ∞`.
-/
theorem exists_forall_norm_le (f : α →ₛ F) : ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
exists_forall_le (f.map fun x => ‖x‖)
theorem memLp_zero (f : α →ₛ E) (μ : Measure α) : MemLp f 0 μ :=
memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable.mpr f.aestronglyMeasurable
theorem memLp_top (f : α →ₛ E) (μ : Measure α) : MemLp f ∞ μ :=
let ⟨C, hfC⟩ := f.exists_forall_norm_le
memLp_top_of_bound f.aestronglyMeasurable C <| Eventually.of_forall hfC
protected theorem eLpNorm'_eq {p : ℝ} (f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) :
eLpNorm' f p μ = (∑ y ∈ f.range, ‖y‖ₑ ^ p * μ (f ⁻¹' {y})) ^ (1 / p) := by
have h_map : (‖f ·‖ₑ ^ p) = f.map (‖·‖ₑ ^ p) := by simp; rfl
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, h_map, lintegral_eq_lintegral, map_lintegral]
theorem measure_preimage_lt_top_of_memLp (hp_pos : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (f : α →ₛ E)
(hf : MemLp f p μ) (y : E) (hy_ne : y ≠ 0) : μ (f ⁻¹' {y}) < ∞ := by
have hp_pos_real : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_pos hp_ne_top
have hf_eLpNorm := MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top hf
rw [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp_pos hp_ne_top, f.eLpNorm'_eq, one_div,
← @ENNReal.lt_rpow_inv_iff _ _ p.toReal⁻¹ (by simp [hp_pos_real]),
@ENNReal.top_rpow_of_pos p.toReal⁻¹⁻¹ (by simp [hp_pos_real]),
ENNReal.sum_lt_top] at hf_eLpNorm
by_cases hyf : y ∈ f.range
swap
· suffices h_empty : f ⁻¹' {y} = ∅ by
rw [h_empty, measure_empty]; exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top
ext1 x
rw [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
refine fun hxy => hyf ?_
rw [mem_range, Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨x, hxy⟩
| specialize hf_eLpNorm y hyf
rw [ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff] at hf_eLpNorm
cases hf_eLpNorm with
| inl hf_eLpNorm => exact hf_eLpNorm.2
| inr hf_eLpNorm =>
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SimpleFuncDenseLp.lean | 289 | 293 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Embedding
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Finite intervals of integers
This file proves that `ℤ` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as finsets and fintypes.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Finset Int
namespace Int
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder ℤ where
finsetIcc a b :=
(Finset.range (b + 1 - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a
finsetIco a b := (Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a
finsetIoc a b :=
(Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)
finsetIoo a b :=
(Finset.range (b - a - 1).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [lt_sub_iff_add_lt, Int.lt_add_one_iff, add_comm] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - a).toNat
rw [← lt_add_one_iff] at hb
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.mp h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - a).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [← add_one_le_iff, le_sub_iff_add_le', add_comm _ (1 : ℤ), ← add_assoc] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - (a + 1)).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha, ← add_one_le_iff, sub_add, add_sub_cancel_right]
exact ⟨sub_le_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [sub_sub, lt_sub_iff_add_lt'] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - (a + 1)).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha, sub_sub]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
variable (a b : ℤ)
theorem Icc_eq_finset_map :
Icc a b =
(Finset.range (b + 1 - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a) :=
rfl
theorem Ico_eq_finset_map :
Ico a b = (Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a) :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_eq_finset_map :
Ioc a b =
(Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)) :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_eq_finset_map :
Ioo a b =
(Finset.range (b - a - 1).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)) :=
rfl
theorem uIcc_eq_finset_map :
uIcc a b = (range (max a b + 1 - min a b).toNat).map
(Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding <| min a b) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_Icc : #(Icc a b) = (b + 1 - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
@[simp]
theorem card_Ico : #(Ico a b) = (b - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioc : #(Ioc a b) = (b - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioo : #(Ioo a b) = (b - a - 1).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
@[simp]
theorem card_uIcc : #(uIcc a b) = (b - a).natAbs + 1 :=
(card_map _).trans <|
(Nat.cast_inj (R := ℤ)).mp <| by
rw [card_range,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le <| le_add_one min_le_max), Int.natCast_add,
Int.natCast_natAbs, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, max_sub_min_eq_abs, add_comm, Int.ofNat_one]
theorem card_Icc_of_le (h : a ≤ b + 1) : (#(Icc a b) : ℤ) = b + 1 - a := by
rw [card_Icc, toNat_sub_of_le h]
theorem card_Ico_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : (#(Ico a b) : ℤ) = b - a := by
rw [card_Ico, toNat_sub_of_le h]
theorem card_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : (#(Ioc a b) : ℤ) = b - a := by
rw [card_Ioc, toNat_sub_of_le h]
theorem card_Ioo_of_lt (h : a < b) : (#(Ioo a b) : ℤ) = b - a - 1 := by
rw [card_Ioo, sub_sub, toNat_sub_of_le h]
theorem Icc_eq_pair : Finset.Icc a (a + 1) = {a, a + 1} := by
ext
simp
omega
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Icc (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintype_Icc : Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) = (b + 1 - a).toNat := by
simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Ico (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintype_Ico : Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) = (b - a).toNat := by
simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Ioc (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintype_Ioc : Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) = (b - a).toNat := by
simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Ioo (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintype_Ioo : Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) = (b - a - 1).toNat := by
simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_uIcc (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintype_uIcc : Fintype.card (Set.uIcc a b) = (b - a).natAbs + 1 := by
simp
theorem card_fintype_Icc_of_le (h : a ≤ b + 1) : (Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) : ℤ) = b + 1 - a := by
simp [h]
theorem card_fintype_Ico_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : (Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) : ℤ) = b - a := by
simp [h]
theorem card_fintype_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : (Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) : ℤ) = b - a := by
simp [h]
theorem card_fintype_Ioo_of_lt (h : a < b) : (Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) : ℤ) = b - a - 1 := by
simp [h, h.le]
theorem image_Ico_emod (n a : ℤ) (h : 0 ≤ a) : (Ico n (n + a)).image (· % a) = Ico 0 a := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_lt_of_le h
· simp
ext i
simp only [mem_image, mem_range, mem_Ico]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨emod_nonneg i ha.ne', emod_lt_of_pos i ha⟩
intro hia
have hn := Int.emod_add_ediv n a
| obtain hi | hi := lt_or_le i (n % a)
· refine ⟨i + a * (n / a + 1), ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Interval.lean | 181 | 182 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
theorem insert_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) :
insert x (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union]
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem insert_iInter (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) : insert x (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iInter_union]
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
lemma iUnion_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋃ x, s x = (⋃ x, s (.inl x)) ∪ ⋃ x, s (.inr x) := iSup_sum
lemma iInter_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋂ x, s x = (⋂ x, s (.inl x)) ∩ ⋂ x, s (.inr x) := iInf_sum
theorem iUnion_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iUnion_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iUnion_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_psigma' _
theorem iInter_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iInter_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iInter_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_psigma' _
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun i _ => u i) x xs
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
lemma biInter_subset_biUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {t : α → Set β} :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := biInf_le_biSup hs
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
@[simp] lemma biUnion_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biSup_const hs
@[simp] lemma biInter_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋂ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biInf_const hs
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_sSup tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnionPowersetGI :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias sUnion_powerset_gi := sUnionPowersetGI
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀ S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀ s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀ s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀ s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, f a :=
sSup_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, f a :=
sInf_image
@[simp]
lemma sUnion_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋃₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sSup_image2
@[simp]
lemma sInter_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋂ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sInf_image2
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀ range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀ S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := x
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
alias sInter_mono := sInter_subset_sInter
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
theorem iUnion_insert_eq_range_union_iUnion {ι : Type*} (x : ι → β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, insert (x i) (t i) = range x ∪ ⋃ i, t i := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union_distrib, union_comm, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀ s ∩ ⋃₀ t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀ s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀ C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf i ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
lemma biUnion_lt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_lt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_le_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_le_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_lt_eq_iInter [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_lt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_le_eq_iInter [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_le_eq_iInf
lemma biUnion_gt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_gt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_ge_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_ge_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_gt_eq_iInf [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_gt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_ge_eq_iInf [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_ge_eq_iInf
section le
variable {ι : Type*} [PartialOrder ι] (s : ι → Set α) (i : ι)
theorem biUnion_le : (⋃ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋃ j < i, s j) ∪ s i :=
biSup_le_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_le : (⋂ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋂ j < i, s j) ∩ s i :=
biInf_le_eq_inf s i
theorem biUnion_ge : (⋃ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∪ ⋃ j > i, s j :=
biSup_ge_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_ge : (⋂ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∩ ⋂ j > i, s j :=
biInf_ge_eq_inf s i
end le
section Pi
variable {π : α → Type*}
theorem pi_def (i : Set α) (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) : pi i s = ⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a := by
ext
simp
theorem univ_pi_eq_iInter (t : ∀ i, Set (π i)) : pi univ t = ⋂ i, eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
simp only [pi_def, iInter_true, mem_univ]
theorem pi_diff_pi_subset (i : Set α) (s t : ∀ a, Set (π a)) :
pi i s \ pi i t ⊆ ⋃ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' (s a \ t a) := by
refine diff_subset_comm.2 fun x hx a ha => ?_
simp only [mem_diff, mem_pi, mem_iUnion, not_exists, mem_preimage, not_and, not_not,
eval_apply] at hx
exact hx.2 _ ha (hx.1 _ ha)
theorem iUnion_univ_pi {ι : α → Type*} (t : (a : α) → ι a → Set (π a)) :
⋃ x : (a : α) → ι a, pi univ (fun a => t a (x a)) = pi univ fun a => ⋃ j : ι a, t a j := by
ext
simp [Classical.skolem]
end Pi
section Directed
theorem directedOn_iUnion {r} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) f)
(h : ∀ x, DirectedOn r (f x)) : DirectedOn r (⋃ x, f x) := by
simp only [DirectedOn, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂ =>
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂
let ⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂)
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
theorem directedOn_sUnion {r} {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(h : ∀ x ∈ S, DirectedOn r x) : DirectedOn r (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact directedOn_iUnion (directedOn_iff_directed.mp hd) (fun i ↦ h i.1 i.2)
theorem pairwise_iUnion₂ {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s ∈ S, s.Pairwise r) : (⋃ s ∈ S, s).Pairwise r := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro x S hS hx y T hT hy hne
obtain ⟨U, hU, hSU, hTU⟩ := hd S hS T hT
exact h U hU (hSU hx) (hTU hy) hne
end Directed
end Set
namespace Function
namespace Surjective
theorem iUnion_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋃ x, g (f x) = ⋃ y, g y :=
hf.iSup_comp g
theorem iInter_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋂ x, g (f x) = ⋂ y, g y :=
hf.iInf_comp g
end Surjective
end Function
/-!
### Disjoint sets
-/
section Disjoint
variable {s t : Set α}
namespace Set
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_left {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (s i) t :=
iSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_right {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint t (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint t (s i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_left {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (s i j) t :=
iSup₂_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_right {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
Disjoint s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint s (t i j) :=
disjoint_iSup₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_left {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
sSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_right {s : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} :
Disjoint s (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_sSup_iff
lemma biUnion_compl_eq_of_pairwise_disjoint_of_iUnion_eq_univ {ι : Type*} {Es : ι → Set α}
(Es_union : ⋃ i, Es i = univ) (Es_disj : Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (Es i) (Es j))
(I : Set ι) :
(⋃ i ∈ I, Es i)ᶜ = ⋃ i ∈ Iᶜ, Es i := by
ext x
obtain ⟨i, hix⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ Es i := by simp [← mem_iUnion, Es_union]
have obs : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ ⋃ j ∈ J, Es j ↔ i ∈ J := by
refine fun J ↦ ⟨?_, fun i_in_J ↦ by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using ⟨i, i_in_J, hix⟩⟩
intro x_in_U
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at x_in_U
obtain ⟨j, j_in_J, hjx⟩ := x_in_U
rwa [show i = j by by_contra i_ne_j; exact Disjoint.ne_of_mem (Es_disj i_ne_j) hix hjx rfl]
have obs' : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ (⋃ j ∈ J, Es j)ᶜ ↔ i ∉ J :=
fun J ↦ by simpa only [mem_compl_iff, not_iff_not] using obs J
rw [obs, obs', mem_compl_iff]
end Set
end Disjoint
/-! ### Intervals -/
namespace Set
lemma nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Iic (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddBelow (range f) := by
have : (⋂ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = lowerBounds (range f) := by
ext c; simp [lowerBounds]
simp [this, BddBelow]
lemma nonempty_iInter_Ici_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Ici (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddAbove (range f) :=
nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
variable [CompleteLattice α]
theorem Ici_iSup (f : ι → α) : Ici (⨆ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Ici (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Ici, iSup_le_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Iic_iInf (f : ι → α) : Iic (⨅ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Iic (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Iic, le_iInf_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Ici_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Ici (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Ici (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Ici_iSup]
theorem Iic_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Iic (⨅ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Iic (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Iic_iInf]
theorem Ici_sSup (s : Set α) : Ici (sSup s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Ici a := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup, Ici_iSup₂]
theorem Iic_sInf (s : Set α) : Iic (sInf s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Iic a := by rw [sInf_eq_iInf, Iic_iInf₂]
end Set
namespace Set
variable (t : α → Set β)
theorem biUnion_diff_biUnion_subset (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
((⋃ x ∈ s₁, t x) \ ⋃ x ∈ s₂, t x) ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, t x := by
simp only [diff_subset_iff, ← biUnion_union]
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
rw [union_diff_self]
apply subset_union_right
/-- If `t` is an indexed family of sets, then there is a natural map from `Σ i, t i` to `⋃ i, t i`
sending `⟨i, x⟩` to `x`. -/
def sigmaToiUnion (x : Σi, t i) : ⋃ i, t i :=
⟨x.2, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x.1, x.2.2⟩⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_surjective : Surjective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
have : ∃ a, b ∈ t a := by simpa using hb
let ⟨a, hb⟩ := this
⟨⟨a, b, hb⟩, rfl⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_injective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Injective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨a₁, b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, b₂, h₂⟩, eq =>
have b_eq : b₁ = b₂ := congr_arg Subtype.val eq
have a_eq : a₁ = a₂ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
have : b₁ ∈ t a₁ ∩ t a₂ := ⟨h₁, b_eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩
(h ne).le_bot this
Sigma.eq a_eq <| Subtype.eq <| by subst b_eq; subst a_eq; rfl
theorem sigmaToiUnion_bijective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Bijective (sigmaToiUnion t) :=
⟨sigmaToiUnion_injective t h, sigmaToiUnion_surjective t⟩
/-- Equivalence from the disjoint union of a family of sets forming a partition of `β`, to `β`
itself. -/
noncomputable def sigmaEquiv (s : α → Set β) (hs : ∀ b, ∃! i, b ∈ s i) :
(Σ i, s i) ≃ β where
toFun | ⟨_, b⟩ => b
invFun b := ⟨(hs b).choose, b, (hs b).choose_spec.1⟩
left_inv | ⟨i, b, hb⟩ => Sigma.subtype_ext ((hs b).choose_spec.2 i hb).symm rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- Equivalence between a disjoint union and a dependent sum. -/
noncomputable def unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint {t : α → Set β}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
(⋃ i, t i) ≃ Σi, t i :=
(Equiv.ofBijective _ <| sigmaToiUnion_bijective t h).symm
theorem iUnion_ge_eq_iUnion_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋃ i ≥ n, u i = ⋃ i, u (i + n) :=
iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add u n
theorem iInter_ge_eq_iInter_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋂ i ≥ n, u i = ⋂ i, u (i + n) :=
iInf_ge_eq_iInf_nat_add u n
theorem _root_.Monotone.iUnion_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Monotone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, f (n + k) = ⋃ n, f n :=
hf.iSup_nat_add k
theorem _root_.Antitone.iInter_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Antitone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋂ n, f (n + k) = ⋂ n, f n :=
hf.iInf_nat_add k
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iInter_ge_nat_add (f : ℕ → Set α) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f (i + k) = ⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f i :=
iSup_iInf_ge_nat_add f k
theorem union_iUnion_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∪ ⋃ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋃ i, u i :=
sup_iSup_nat_succ u
theorem inter_iInter_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∩ ⋂ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋂ i, u i :=
inf_iInf_nat_succ u
end Set
open Set
variable [CompleteLattice β]
theorem iSup_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨆ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨆ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a := by
rw [iSup_comm]
simp_rw [mem_iUnion, iSup_exists]
theorem iInf_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨅ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨅ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a :=
iSup_iUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s f
theorem sSup_iUnion (t : ι → Set β) : sSup (⋃ i, t i) = ⨆ i, sSup (t i) := by
simp_rw [sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sSup_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sSup (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ t ∈ s, sSup t := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sInf_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sInf (⋃₀ s) = ⨅ t ∈ s, sInf t :=
sSup_sUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s
lemma iSup_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨆ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨆ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iSup_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
lemma iInf_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨅ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨅ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iInf_iUnion, ← iInf_subtype'']
lemma forall_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← iInf_Prop_eq, iInf_sUnion]
lemma exists_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, ∃ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← exists_prop, ← iSup_Prop_eq, iSup_sUnion]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,855 | 1,856 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.InnerProductSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
/-!
# Basic properties of Haar measures on real vector spaces
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Filter Inv MeasureTheory.Measure Module Set TopologicalSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Pointwise Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
/- The instance `MeasureTheory.Measure.IsAddHaarMeasure.noAtoms` applies in particular to show that
an additive Haar measure on a nontrivial finite-dimensional real vector space has no atom. -/
example {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [Nontrivial E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] : NoAtoms μ := by
infer_instance
section LinearEquiv
variable {𝕜 G H : Type*} [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableSpace H] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace G] [TopologicalSpace H] [AddCommGroup G] [AddCommGroup H]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [IsTopologicalAddGroup H] [Module 𝕜 G] [Module 𝕜 H] (μ : Measure G)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] [BorelSpace G] [BorelSpace H]
[CompleteSpace 𝕜] [T2Space G] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 G] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 G]
[ContinuousSMul 𝕜 H] [T2Space H]
instance MapLinearEquiv.isAddHaarMeasure (e : G ≃ₗ[𝕜] H) : IsAddHaarMeasure (μ.map e) :=
e.toContinuousLinearEquiv.isAddHaarMeasure_map _
end LinearEquiv
section SeminormedGroup
variable {G H : Type*} [MeasurableSpace G] [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[IsTopologicalGroup G] [BorelSpace G] [LocallyCompactSpace G]
[MeasurableSpace H] [SeminormedGroup H] [OpensMeasurableSpace H]
-- TODO: This could be streamlined by proving that inner regular measures always exist
open Metric Bornology in
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.MonoidHom.exists_nhds_isBounded (f : G →* H) (hf : Measurable f) (x : G) :
∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, IsBounded (f '' s) := by
let K : PositiveCompacts G := Classical.arbitrary _
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < haar (interior K ∩ f ⁻¹' ball 1 n) := by
by_contra!
simp_rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, ← measure_iUnion_null_iff, ← inter_iUnion, ← preimage_iUnion,
iUnion_ball_nat, preimage_univ, inter_univ] at this
exact this.not_gt <| isOpen_interior.measure_pos _ K.interior_nonempty
rw [← one_mul x, ← op_smul_eq_mul]
refine ⟨_, smul_mem_nhds_smul _ <| div_mem_nhds_one_of_haar_pos_ne_top haar _
(isOpen_interior.measurableSet.inter <| hf measurableSet_ball) hn <|
mt (measure_mono_top <| inter_subset_left.trans interior_subset) K.isCompact.measure_ne_top,
| ?_⟩
have : Bornology.IsBounded (f '' (interior K ∩ f ⁻¹' ball 1 n)) :=
isBounded_ball.subset <| (image_mono inter_subset_right).trans <| image_preimage_subset _ _
rw [image_op_smul_distrib, image_div]
exact (this.div this).smul _
end SeminormedGroup
/-- A Borel-measurable group hom from a locally compact normed group to a real normed space is
continuous. -/
lemma AddMonoidHom.continuous_of_measurable {G H : Type*}
[SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G] [LocallyCompactSpace G]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup H] [MeasurableSpace H] [OpensMeasurableSpace H] [NormedSpace ℝ H]
(f : G →+ H) (hf : Measurable f) : Continuous f :=
let ⟨_s, hs, hbdd⟩ := f.exists_nhds_isBounded hf 0; f.continuous_of_isBounded_nhds_zero hs hbdd
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/NormedSpace.lean | 64 | 83 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.WithBot
/-!
# Successors and predecessors of naturals
In this file, we show that `ℕ` is both an archimedean `succOrder` and an archimedean `predOrder`.
-/
open Function Order
namespace Nat
variable {m n : ℕ}
-- so that Lean reads `Nat.succ` through `succ_order.succ`
@[instance] abbrev instSuccOrder : SuccOrder ℕ :=
SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff succ Nat.succ_le
instance instSuccAddOrder : SuccAddOrder ℕ := ⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
-- so that Lean reads `Nat.pred` through `pred_order.pred`
@[instance] abbrev instPredOrder : PredOrder ℕ where
pred := pred
pred_le := pred_le
min_of_le_pred {a} ha := by
cases a
· exact isMin_bot
· exact (not_succ_le_self _ ha).elim
le_pred_of_lt {a} {b} h := by
cases b
· exact (a.not_lt_zero h).elim
· exact le_of_succ_le_succ h
instance instPredSubOrder : PredSubOrder ℕ := ⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem succ_eq_succ : Order.succ = succ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred_eq_pred : Order.pred = pred :=
rfl
protected theorem succ_iterate (a : ℕ) : ∀ n, succ^[n] a = a + n :=
Order.succ_iterate a
protected theorem pred_iterate (a : ℕ) : ∀ n, pred^[n] a = a - n
| 0 => rfl
| | n + 1 => by
rw [Function.iterate_succ', sub_succ]
exact congr_arg _ (Nat.pred_iterate a n)
lemma le_succ_iff_eq_or_le : m ≤ n.succ ↔ m = n.succ ∨ m ≤ n := Order.le_succ_iff_eq_or_le
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/SuccPred.lean | 62 | 66 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IsBounded
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the liminf/limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `limsSup f` (`limsInf f`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `limsSup f` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`limsInf f`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `limsSup (map u f)`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `inf (sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `inf_n (sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `limsup (fun x ↦ 1/x)` on ℝ.
Then there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `sup`
beforehand is not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything.
So one can not use this `inf sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has
to use a less tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s : Set α} {u : β → α}
/-- The `limsSup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def limsSup (f : Filter α) : α :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
/-- The `limsInf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def limsInf (f : Filter α) : α :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsSup (map u f)
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsInf (map u f)
/-- The `blimsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the infimum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `u x ≤ a` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def blimsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a }
/-- The `bliminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the supremum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `a ≤ u x` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def bliminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x }
section
variable {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop}
theorem limsup_eq : limsup u f = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem liminf_eq : liminf u f = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n } :=
rfl
theorem blimsup_eq : blimsup u f p = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem bliminf_eq : bliminf u f p = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x } :=
rfl
lemma liminf_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
liminf (u ∘ v) f = liminf u (map v f) := rfl
lemma limsup_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
limsup (u ∘ v) f = limsup u (map v f) := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (blimsup u f fun _ => True) = limsup u f := by
simp [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (bliminf u f fun _ => True) = liminf u f := by
simp [bliminf_eq, liminf_eq]
lemma blimsup_eq_limsup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq, eventually_inf_principal, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma bliminf_eq_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) := by
rw [blimsup_eq_limsup, limsup, limsup, ← map_map, map_comap_setCoe_val]
theorem bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsSup_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_limsInf_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) : a ≤ limsInf f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem limsup_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a) : limsup u f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_liminf_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n) : a ≤ liminf u f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem le_limsSup_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsSup f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem limsInf_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ n) → b ≤ a) : limsInf f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem le_limsup_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsup u f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem liminf_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ u n) → b ≤ a) : liminf u f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem limsInf_le_limsSup {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(h₁ : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsSup f :=
liminf_le_of_le h₂ fun a₀ ha₀ =>
le_limsup_of_le h₁ fun a₁ ha₁ =>
show a₀ ≤ a₁ from
let ⟨_, hb₀, hb₁⟩ := (ha₀.and ha₁).exists
le_trans hb₀ hb₁
theorem liminf_le_limsup {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] {u : β → α}
(h : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h' : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ limsup u f :=
limsInf_le_limsSup h h'
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in g, n ≤ a) → ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
csInf_le_csInf hf hg h
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) → ∀ᶠ n in g, a ≤ n) : limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
csSup_le_csSup hg hf h
theorem limsup_le_limsup {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : u ≤ᶠ[f] v)
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup v f :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hu hv fun _ => h.trans
theorem liminf_le_liminf {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ v a)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf v f :=
limsup_le_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) h hv hu
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsup_le_limsup_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup u g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
theorem liminf_le_liminf_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf u g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simp only [limsSup, eventually_principal]; exact csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup h hs
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s :=
limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
lemma limsup_top_eq_ciSup [Nonempty β] (hu : BddAbove (range u)) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sSup_range]
lemma liminf_top_eq_ciInf [Nonempty β] (hu : BddBelow (range u)) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sInf_range]
theorem limsup_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : limsup u f = limsup v f := by
rw [limsup_eq]
congr with b
exact eventually_congr (h.mono fun x hx => by simp [hx])
theorem blimsup_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
blimsup u f p = blimsup v f p := by
simpa only [blimsup_eq_limsup] using limsup_congr <| eventually_inf_principal.2 h
theorem bliminf_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
bliminf u f p = bliminf v f p :=
blimsup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem liminf_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : liminf u f = liminf v f :=
limsup_congr (β := βᵒᵈ) h
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : limsup (fun _ => b) f = b := by
simpa only [limsup_eq, eventually_const] using csInf_Ici
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : liminf (fun _ => b) f = b :=
limsup_const (β := βᵒᵈ) b
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
liminf f v = sSup (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i)) := by
simp_rw [liminf_eq, hv.eventually_iff]
congr
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, iInter_coe_set, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, mem_Iic, Subtype.exists,
exists_prop]
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
liminf f v = sSup univ := by
simp [hv.eq_bot_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, h'i⟩, liminf_eq]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
limsup f v = sInf (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Ici (f i)) :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter (α := αᵒᵈ) hv
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
limsup f v = sInf univ :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty (α := αᵒᵈ) hv i hi h'i
@[simp]
theorem liminf_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
liminf (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop := by
rw [← Function.comp_def, liminf, liminf, ← map_map, map_add_atTop_eq_nat]
@[simp]
theorem limsup_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) : limsup (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = limsup f atTop :=
@liminf_nat_add αᵒᵈ _ f k
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_bot : limsSup (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sInf_le <| by simp
@[simp] theorem limsup_bot (f : β → α) : limsup f ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp [limsup]
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_bot : limsInf (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sSup <| by simp
@[simp] theorem liminf_bot (f : β → α) : liminf f ⊥ = ⊤ := by simp [liminf]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_top : limsSup (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sInf <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => top_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_top : limsInf (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sSup_le <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => bot_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (blimsup u f fun _ => False) = ⊥ := by
simp [blimsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (bliminf u f fun _ => False) = ⊤ := by
simp [bliminf_eq]
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊥` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const_bot {f : Filter β} : limsup (fun _ : β => (⊥ : α)) f = (⊥ : α) := by
rw [limsup_eq, eq_bot_iff]
exact sInf_le (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => le_rfl)
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊤` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const_top {f : Filter β} : liminf (fun _ : β => (⊤ : α)) f = (⊤ : α) :=
limsup_const_bot (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s} {f : Filter α} (h : f.HasBasis p s) :
limsSup f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), sSup (s i) :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun i hi => sInf_le <| h.eventually_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
(le_sInf fun _ ha =>
let ⟨_, hi, ha⟩ := h.eventually_iff.1 ha
iInf₂_le_of_le _ hi <| sSup_le ha)
theorem HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {f : Filter α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsInf f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), sInf (s i) :=
HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {f : Filter α} : limsSup f = ⨅ s ∈ f, sSup s :=
f.basis_sets.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {f : Filter α} : limsInf f = ⨆ s ∈ f, sInf s :=
limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsup_le_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f ≤ ⨆ n, u n :=
limsup_le_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (le_iSup u))
theorem iInf_le_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : ⨅ n, u n ≤ liminf u f :=
le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (iInf_le u))
/-- In a complete lattice, the limsup of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ a ∈ s, u a :=
(f.basis_sets.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, u i :=
(atTop_basis.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, iInf_const]; rfl
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i : ℕ, u (i + n) := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat, iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsup u f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, u a :=
(h.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_sSup (s : Set α) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simpa only [limsSup, eventually_principal] using sInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup s
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_sInf (s : Set α) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s := by
simpa only [limsInf, eventually_principal] using sSup_lowerBounds_eq_sInf s
@[simp] lemma limsup_top_eq_iSup (u : β → α) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_sSup, sSup_range]
@[simp] lemma liminf_top_eq_iInf (u : β → α) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_sInf, sInf_range]
theorem blimsup_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊥ → (p x ↔ q x)) : blimsup u f p = blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq]
congr with a
refine eventually_congr (h.mono fun b hb => ?_)
rcases eq_or_ne (u b) ⊥ with hu | hu; · simp [hu]
rw [hb hu]
theorem bliminf_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊤ → (p x ↔ q x)) : bliminf u f p = bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_congr' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
lemma HasBasis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(hf : f.HasBasis p s) {q : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f q = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, ⨆ (_ : q a), u a := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, (hf.inf_principal _).limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, mem_inter_iff, iSup_and,
mem_setOf_eq]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
blimsup u f p = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b := by
simp only [f.basis_sets.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_and', id, and_comm]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
blimsup u atTop p = ⨅ i, ⨆ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j := by
simp only [atTop_basis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, @and_comm (p _), iSup_and, mem_Ici, iInf_true]
/-- In a complete lattice, the liminf of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : liminf u f = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ a ∈ s, u a :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, u i :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ u
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i : ℕ, u (i + n) :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : liminf u f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), ⨅ a ∈ s i, u a :=
HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
bliminf u f p = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup αᵒᵈ β _ f p u
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
bliminf u atTop p = ⨆ i, ⨅ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ p u
theorem limsup_eq_sInf_sSup {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
limsup a F = sInf ((fun I => sSup (a '' I)) '' F.sets) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [limsup_eq]
refine sInf_le_sInf fun x hx => ?_
rcases (mem_image _ F.sets x).mp hx with ⟨I, ⟨I_mem_F, hI⟩⟩
filter_upwards [I_mem_F] with i hi
exact hI ▸ le_sSup (mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
· refine le_sInf fun b hb => sInf_le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem _ hb) <| sSup_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
exact h
theorem liminf_eq_sSup_sInf {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
liminf a F = sSup ((fun I => sInf (a '' I)) '' F.sets) :=
@Filter.limsup_eq_sInf_sSup ι (OrderDual R) _ _ a
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ x) : liminf u f ≤ x := by
rw [liminf_eq]
refine sSup_le fun b hb => ?_
have hbx : ∃ᶠ _ in f, b ≤ x := by
revert h
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently, not_frequently]
exact fun h => hb.mp (h.mono fun a hbx hba hax => hbx (hba.trans hax))
exact hbx.exists.choose_spec
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, x ≤ u a) : x ≤ limsup u f :=
liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (β := βᵒᵈ) h
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the limsup of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop := by
rw [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', map_iInf]
simp_rw [_root_.map_iSup, ← Function.comp_apply (f := f), ← Function.iterate_succ' f,
← Nat.add_succ]
conv_rhs => rw [iInf_split _ (0 < ·)]
simp only [not_lt, Nat.le_zero, iInf_iInf_eq_left, add_zero, iInf_nat_gt_zero_eq, left_eq_inf]
refine (iInf_le (fun i => ⨆ j, f^[j + (i + 1)] a) 0).trans ?_
simp only [zero_add, Function.comp_apply, iSup_le_iff]
exact fun i => le_iSup (fun i => f^[i] a) (i + 1)
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the liminf of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_liminf_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop :=
(CompleteLatticeHom.dual f).apply_limsup_iterate _
variable {f g : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u v : β → α}
theorem blimsup_mono (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f q :=
sInf_le_sInf fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem bliminf_antitone (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem mono_blimsup' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.2 hx').trans (hx.1 hx')
theorem mono_blimsup (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
mono_blimsup' <| Eventually.of_forall h
theorem mono_bliminf' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.1 hx').trans (hx.2 hx')
theorem mono_bliminf (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
mono_bliminf' <| Eventually.of_forall h
theorem bliminf_antitone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : bliminf u g p ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
theorem blimsup_monotone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u g p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
theorem blimsup_and_le_inf : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p ⊓ blimsup u f q :=
le_inf (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_left :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_right :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f q :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and : bliminf u f p ⊔ bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
blimsup_and_le_inf (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_left : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_right : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
/-- See also `Filter.blimsup_or_eq_sup`. -/
theorem blimsup_sup_le_or : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
sup_le (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_left : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_right : blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
/-- See also `Filter.bliminf_or_eq_inf`. -/
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_sup_le_or (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_left : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_right : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f q :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
theorem _root_.OrderIso.apply_blimsup [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (blimsup u f p) = blimsup (e ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, map_sInf, Function.comp_apply, e.image_eq_preimage,
Set.preimage_setOf_eq, e.le_symm_apply]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (bliminf u f p) = bliminf (e ∘ u) f p :=
e.dual.apply_blimsup
theorem _root_.sSupHom.apply_blimsup_le [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sSupHom α γ) :
g (blimsup u f p) ≤ blimsup (g ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup, Function.comp]
refine ((OrderHomClass.mono g).map_iInf₂_le _).trans ?_
simp only [_root_.map_iSup, le_refl]
theorem _root_.sInfHom.le_apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sInfHom α γ) :
bliminf (g ∘ u) f p ≤ g (bliminf u f p) :=
(sInfHom.dual g).apply_blimsup_le
end CompleteLattice
section CompleteDistribLattice
variable [CompleteDistribLattice α] {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
lemma limsup_sup_filter {g} : limsup u (f ⊔ g) = limsup u f ⊔ limsup u g := by
refine le_antisymm ?_
(sup_le (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_left) (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_right))
simp_rw [limsup_eq, sInf_sup_eq, sup_sInf_eq, mem_setOf_eq, le_iInf₂_iff]
intro a ha b hb
exact sInf_le ⟨ha.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_left, hb.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_right⟩
lemma liminf_sup_filter {g} : liminf u (f ⊔ g) = liminf u f ⊓ liminf u g :=
limsup_sup_filter (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_or_eq_sup : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, ← limsup_sup_filter, ← inf_sup_left, sup_principal, setOf_or]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_eq_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_or_eq_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_sup_not : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f (¬p ·) = limsup u f := by
simp_rw [← blimsup_or_eq_sup, or_not, blimsup_true]
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_inf_not : bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f (¬p ·) = liminf u f :=
blimsup_sup_not (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_not_sup : blimsup u f (¬p ·) ⊔ blimsup u f p = limsup u f := by
simpa only [not_not] using blimsup_sup_not (p := (¬p ·))
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_not_inf : bliminf u f (¬p ·) ⊓ bliminf u f p = liminf u f :=
blimsup_not_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
lemma limsup_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
limsup (s.piecewise u v) f = blimsup u f (· ∈ s) ⊔ blimsup v f (· ∉ s) := by
rw [← blimsup_sup_not (p := (· ∈ s))]
refine congr_arg₂ _ (blimsup_congr ?_) (blimsup_congr ?_) <;>
filter_upwards with _ h using by simp [h]
lemma liminf_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
liminf (s.piecewise u v) f = bliminf u f (· ∈ s) ⊓ bliminf v f (· ∉ s) :=
limsup_piecewise (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem sup_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊔ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_sup_eq, sup_iInf₂_eq]
congr; ext s; congr; ext hs; congr
exact (biSup_const (nonempty_of_mem hs)).symm
theorem inf_liminf [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊓ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ) a
theorem sup_liminf (a : α) : a ⊔ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf]
rw [sup_comm, biSup_sup (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [iInf₂_sup_eq, sup_comm (a := a)]
theorem inf_limsup (a : α) : a ⊓ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_liminf (α := αᵒᵈ) a
end CompleteDistribLattice
section CompleteBooleanAlgebra
variable [CompleteBooleanAlgebra α] (f : Filter β) (u : β → α)
theorem limsup_compl : (limsup u f)ᶜ = liminf (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
theorem liminf_compl : (liminf u f)ᶜ = limsup (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
theorem limsup_sdiff (a : α) : limsup u f \ a = limsup (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, sdiff_eq]
rw [biInf_inf (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [inf_comm, inf_iSup₂_eq, inf_comm]
theorem liminf_sdiff [NeBot f] (a : α) : liminf u f \ a = liminf (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [sdiff_eq, inf_comm _ aᶜ, inf_liminf]
theorem sdiff_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a \ limsup u f = liminf (fun b => a \ u b) f := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, liminf_compl, comp_def, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_limsup]
theorem sdiff_liminf (a : α) : a \ liminf u f = limsup (fun b => a \ u b) f := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, limsup_compl, comp_def, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_liminf]
end CompleteBooleanAlgebra
section SetLattice
variable {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {𝓕 : Filter ι} {a : α}
lemma mem_liminf_iff_eventually_mem : (a ∈ liminf s 𝓕) ↔ (∀ᶠ i in 𝓕, a ∈ s i) := by
simpa only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, iSup_eq_iUnion, iInf_eq_iInter, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter]
using ⟨fun ⟨S, hS, hS'⟩ ↦ mem_of_superset hS (by tauto), fun h ↦ ⟨{i | a ∈ s i}, h, by tauto⟩⟩
lemma mem_limsup_iff_frequently_mem : (a ∈ limsup s 𝓕) ↔ (∃ᶠ i in 𝓕, a ∈ s i) := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, iff_not_comm, ← mem_compl_iff, limsup_compl, comp_apply,
mem_liminf_iff_eventually_mem]
theorem cofinite.blimsup_set_eq :
blimsup s cofinite p = { x | { n | p n ∧ x ∈ s n }.Infinite } := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, le_eq_subset, eventually_cofinite, not_forall, sInf_eq_sInter, exists_prop]
ext x
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hx t h => ?_⟩ <;> contrapose! h
· simp only [mem_sInter, mem_setOf_eq, not_forall, exists_prop]
exact ⟨{x}ᶜ, by simpa using h, by simp⟩
· exact hx.mono fun i hi => ⟨hi.1, fun hit => h (hit hi.2)⟩
theorem cofinite.bliminf_set_eq : bliminf s cofinite p = { x | { n | p n ∧ x ∉ s n }.Finite } := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, ← blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup,
cofinite.blimsup_set_eq]
rfl
/-- In other words, `limsup cofinite s` is the set of elements lying inside the family `s`
infinitely often. -/
theorem cofinite.limsup_set_eq : limsup s cofinite = { x | { n | x ∈ s n }.Infinite } := by
simp only [← cofinite.blimsup_true s, cofinite.blimsup_set_eq, true_and]
/-- In other words, `liminf cofinite s` is the set of elements lying outside the family `s`
finitely often. -/
theorem cofinite.liminf_set_eq : liminf s cofinite = { x | { n | x ∉ s n }.Finite } := by
simp only [← cofinite.bliminf_true s, cofinite.bliminf_set_eq, true_and]
theorem exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup {l : Filter β} {b : ι → Set β} {q : ι → Prop}
(hl : l.HasBasis q b) {u : β → Set α} {p : β → Prop} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ blimsup u l p) :
∃ f : { i | q i } → β, ∀ i, x ∈ u (f i) ∧ p (f i) ∧ f i ∈ b i := by
rw [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup] at hx
simp only [iSup_eq_iUnion, iInf_eq_iInter, mem_iInter, mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
choose g hg hg' using hx
refine ⟨fun i : { i | q i } => g (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2), fun i => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact hg' (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2)
· exact hg (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2)
theorem exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup' {l : Filter β} {b : ι → Set β}
(hl : l.HasBasis (fun _ => True) b) {u : β → Set α} {p : β → Prop} {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ blimsup u l p) : ∃ f : ι → β, ∀ i, x ∈ u (f i) ∧ p (f i) ∧ f i ∈ b i := by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup hl hx
exact ⟨fun i => f ⟨i, trivial⟩, fun i => hf ⟨i, trivial⟩⟩
end SetLattice
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
theorem frequently_lt_of_lt_limsSup {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {a : α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : a < limsSup f) : ∃ᶠ n in f, a < n := by
contrapose! h
simp only [not_frequently, not_lt] at h
exact limsSup_le_of_le hf h
theorem frequently_lt_of_limsInf_lt {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {a : α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : limsInf f < a) : ∃ᶠ n in f, n < a :=
frequently_lt_of_lt_limsSup (α := OrderDual α) hf h
theorem eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {u : α → β}
{b : β} (h : b < liminf u f)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
∀ᶠ a in f, b < u a := by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ : ∃ (c : β) (_ : c ∈ { c : β | ∀ᶠ n : α in f, c ≤ u n }), b < c := by
simp_rw [exists_prop]
exact exists_lt_of_lt_csSup hu h
exact hc.mono fun x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hbc hx
theorem eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {u : α → β}
{b : β} (h : limsup u f < b)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
∀ᶠ a in f, u a < b :=
eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (β := βᵒᵈ) h hu
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α]
/-- If `Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x`, then for all `ε > 0`, eventually we have `u b < x + ε`. -/
theorem eventually_lt_add_pos_of_limsup_le [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α]
{x ε : α} {u : β → α} (hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder LE.le atTop u) (hu : Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x)
(hε : 0 < ε) :
∀ᶠ b : β in atTop, u b < x + ε :=
eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hu (lt_add_of_pos_right x hε)) hu_bdd
/-- If `x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop`, then for all `ε < 0`, eventually we have `x + ε < u b`. -/
theorem eventually_add_neg_lt_of_le_liminf [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α]
{x ε : α} {u : β → α} (hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder GE.ge atTop u) (hu : x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop)
(hε : ε < 0) :
∀ᶠ b : β in atTop, x + ε < u b :=
eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_of_neg_right x hε) hu) hu_bdd
/-- If `Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x`, then for all `ε > 0`, there exists a positive natural
number `n` such that `u n < x + ε`. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_limsup_le [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α] {x ε : α} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder LE.le atTop u) (hu : Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x) (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ n : PNat, u n < x + ε := by
have h : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, u n < x + ε := eventually_lt_add_pos_of_limsup_le hu_bdd hu hε
simp only [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos _⟩, hn (n + 1) (Nat.le_succ _)⟩
/-- If `x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop`, then for all `ε < 0`, there exists a positive natural
number `n` such that ` x + ε < u n`. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_le_liminf [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α] {x ε : α} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder GE.ge atTop u) (hu : x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop) (hε : ε < 0) :
∃ n : PNat, x + ε < u n := by
have h : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, x + ε < u n := eventually_add_neg_lt_of_le_liminf hu_bdd hu hε
simp only [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos _⟩, hn (n + 1) (Nat.le_succ _)⟩
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β}
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le {b : β} (hu_le : ∃ᶠ x in f, b ≤ u x)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
b ≤ limsup u f := by
revert hu_le
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently]
simp_rw [← lt_iff_not_ge]
exact fun h => eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt h hu
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le {b : β} (hu_le : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ b)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ b :=
le_limsup_of_frequently_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hu_le hu
theorem frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup {b : β}
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : b < limsup u f) : ∃ᶠ x in f, b < u x := by
contrapose! h
apply limsSup_le_of_le hu
simpa using h
theorem frequently_lt_of_liminf_lt {b : β}
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : liminf u f < b) : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x < b :=
frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) hu h
theorem limsup_le_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∀ᶠ a in f, u a < y := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (h.trans_lt h') h₂, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
--Two cases: Either `x` is a cluster point from above, or it is not.
--In the first case, we use `forall_lt_iff_le'` and split an interval.
--In the second case, the function `u` must eventually be smaller or equal to `x`.
| by_cases h' : ∀ y > x, ∃ z, x < z ∧ z < y
· rw [← forall_lt_iff_le']
intro y x_y
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 847 | 849 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
/-!
# Matrices
This file contains basic results on matrices including bundled versions of matrix operators.
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
universe u u' v w
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
section
variable (R)
/-- This is `Matrix.of` bundled as a linear equivalence. -/
def ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α where
__ := ofAddEquiv
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑(ofLinearEquiv _ : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α) = of := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑((ofLinearEquiv _).symm : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] (m → n → α)) = of.symm := rfl
end
theorem sum_apply [AddCommMonoid α] (i : m) (j : n) (s : Finset β) (g : β → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ c ∈ s, g c) i j = ∑ c ∈ s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
variable {n α R}
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
lemma zero_le_one_elem [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i j : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i j := by
by_cases hi : i = j
· subst hi
simp
· simp [hi]
lemma zero_le_one_row [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i :=
zero_le_one_elem i
end One
end Diagonal
section Diag
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : Matrix n n α →+ n → α where
toFun := diag
map_zero' := diag_zero
map_add' := diag_add
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Matrix n n α →ₗ[R] n → α :=
{ diagAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diag_smul }
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diag_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix n n α)) : diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) l
@[simp]
theorem diag_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) s
@[simp]
theorem diag_sum {ι} [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) f s
end Diag
open Matrix
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
end AddCommMonoid
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
variable (α n)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalRingHom [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] : (n → α) →+* Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
map_one' := diagonal_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ => (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem diagonal_pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonalRingHom n α) v k).symm
/-- The ring homomorphism `α →+* Matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] : α →+* Matrix n n α :=
(diagonalRingHom n α).comp <| Pi.constRingHom n α
section Scalar
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem scalar_apply (a : α) : scalar n a = diagonal fun _ => a :=
rfl
theorem scalar_inj [Nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
(diagonal_injective.comp Function.const_injective).eq_iff
theorem scalar_commute_iff {r : α} {M : Matrix n n α} :
Commute (scalar n r) M ↔ r • M = MulOpposite.op r • M := by
simp_rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, scalar_apply, ← smul_eq_diagonal_mul, ← op_smul_eq_mul_diagonal]
theorem scalar_commute (r : α) (hr : ∀ r', Commute r r') (M : Matrix n n α) :
Commute (scalar n r) M := scalar_commute_iff.2 <| ext fun _ _ => hr _
end Scalar
end Semiring
section Algebra
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β]
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (Matrix n n α) where
algebraMap := (Matrix.scalar n).comp (algebraMap R α)
commutes' _ _ := scalar_commute _ (fun _ => Algebra.commutes _ _) _
smul_def' r x := by ext; simp [Matrix.scalar, Algebra.smul_def r]
theorem algebraMap_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebraMap R α r else 0 := by
dsimp [algebraMap, Algebra.algebraMap, Matrix.scalar]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, Matrix.one_apply_ne]
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebraMap R (n → α) r) := rfl
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonalRingHom :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) = (diagonalRingHom n α).comp (algebraMap R _) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_algebraMap (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebraMap R α r) = algebraMap R β r) :
(algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r).map f = algebraMap R (Matrix n n β) r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf]
simp [hf₂]
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAlgHom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalRingHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
commutes' := fun r => (algebraMap_eq_diagonal r).symm }
end Algebra
section AddHom
variable [Add α]
variable (R α) in
/-- Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def entryAddHom (i : m) (j : n) : AddHom (Matrix m n α) α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddHom _ i)).comp
(AddHomClass.toAddHom ofAddEquiv.symm) :=
rfl
end AddHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive monoid homomorphism. Note this cannot be upgraded to
a ring homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryAddMonoidHom (i : m) (j : n) : Matrix m n α →+ α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddMonoidHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddMonoidHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i)).comp
(AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom ofAddEquiv.symm) := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma evalAddMonoidHom_comp_diagAddMonoidHom (i : m) :
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i).comp (diagAddMonoidHom m α) = entryAddMonoidHom α i i := by
simp [AddMonoidHom.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryAddMonoidHom α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as a linear map. Note this cannot be upgraded to an algebra
homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryLinearMap (i : m) (j : n) :
Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryLinearMap_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryLinearMap R α i j =
LinearMap.proj j ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ (ofLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_comp_diagLinearMap (i : m) :
LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ diagLinearMap m R α = entryLinearMap R α i i := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddMonoidHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : _ →+ _) = entryAddMonoidHom α i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end LinearMap
end Matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `Matrix.map`
-/
namespace Equiv
/-- The `Equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `Equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ β) : Matrix m n α ≃ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
invFun M := M.map f.symm
left_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (Equiv.refl α).mapMatrix = Equiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α] [AddZeroClass β] [AddZeroClass γ]
/-- The `AddMonoidHom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddMonoidHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) : Matrix m n α →+ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_zero' := Matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AddMonoidHom.id α).mapMatrix = AddMonoidHom.id (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddMonoidHom β i j).comp f.mapMatrix = f.comp (entryAddMonoidHom α i j) := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
namespace AddEquiv
variable [Add α] [Add β] [Add γ]
/-- The `AddEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f (map_add f) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (AddEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = AddEquiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+ β) (g : β ≃+ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddHom β i j).comp (AddHomClass.toAddHom f.mapMatrix) =
(f : AddHom α β).comp (entryAddHom _ i j) := rfl
end AddEquiv
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearMap` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearMap` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
map_smul' r := Matrix.map_smul f r (f.map_smul r)
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : LinearMap.id.mapMatrix = (LinearMap.id : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₗ[R] γ) (g : α →ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix = f ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix,
f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (LinearEquiv.refl R α).mapMatrix = LinearEquiv.refl R (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₗ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mapMatrix_toLinearMap (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
(f.mapMatrix : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β).toLinearMap = f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix.toLinearMap =
f.toLinearMap ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := by
simp only [mapMatrix_toLinearMap, LinearMap.entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix]
end LinearEquiv
namespace RingHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+* β) : Matrix m m α →+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Matrix.map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (RingHom.id α).mapMatrix = RingHom.id (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+* γ) (g : α →+* β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →+* _) :=
rfl
end RingHom
namespace RingEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+* β) : Matrix m m α ≃+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix,
f.toAddEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (RingEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = RingEquiv.refl (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+* β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃+* _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+* β) (g : β ≃+* γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃+* _) :=
rfl
open MulOpposite in
/--
For any ring `R`, we have ring isomorphism `Matₙₓₙ(Rᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose.
-/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun M := op (M.transpose.map unop)
invFun M := M.unop.transpose.map op
left_inv _ := by aesop
right_inv _ := by aesop
map_mul' _ _ := unop_injective <| by ext; simp [transpose, mul_apply]
map_add' _ _ := by aesop
end RingEquiv
namespace AlgHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
commutes' := fun r => Matrix.map_algebraMap r f (map_zero _) (f.commutes r) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AlgHom.id R α).mapMatrix = AlgHom.id R (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₐ[R] γ) (g : α →ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAlgHom.mapMatrix,
f.toRingEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : AlgEquiv.refl.mapMatrix = (AlgEquiv.refl : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₐ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
/-- For any algebra `α` over a ring `R`, we have an `R`-algebra isomorphism
`Matₙₓₙ(αᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose. If `α` is commutative,
we can get rid of the `ᵒᵖ` in the left-hand side, see `Matrix.transposeAlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!] def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
__ := RingEquiv.mopMatrix
commutes' _ := MulOpposite.unop_injective <| by
ext; simp [algebraMap_matrix_apply, eq_comm, apply_ite MulOpposite.unop]
end AlgEquiv
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Transpose
open Matrix
variable (m n α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AddEquiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeAddEquiv [Add α] : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix n m α where
toFun := transpose
invFun := transpose
left_inv := transpose_transpose
right_inv := transpose_transpose
map_add' := transpose_add
@[simp]
theorem transposeAddEquiv_symm [Add α] : (transposeAddEquiv m n α).symm = transposeAddEquiv n m α :=
rfl
variable {m n α}
theorem transpose_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᵀ = (l.map transpose).sum :=
map_list_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) l
theorem transpose_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᵀ = (s.map transpose).sum :=
(transposeAddEquiv m n α).toAddMonoidHom.map_multiset_sum s
theorem transpose_sum [AddCommMonoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (M : ι → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ i ∈ s, M i)ᵀ = ∑ i ∈ s, (M i)ᵀ :=
map_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) _ s
variable (m n R α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m α :=
{ transposeAddEquiv m n α with map_smul' := transpose_smul }
@[simp]
theorem transposeLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
(transposeLinearEquiv m n R α).symm = transposeLinearEquiv n m R α :=
rfl
variable {m n R α}
variable (m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `RingEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeRingEquiv [AddCommMonoid α] [CommSemigroup α] [Fintype m] :
Matrix m m α ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
invFun := fun M => M.unopᵀ
map_mul' := fun M N =>
(congr_arg MulOpposite.op (transpose_mul M N)).trans (MulOpposite.op_mul _ _)
left_inv := fun M => transpose_transpose M
right_inv := fun M => MulOpposite.unop_injective <| transpose_transpose M.unop }
variable {m α}
@[simp]
theorem transpose_pow [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix m m α) (k : ℕ) :
(M ^ k)ᵀ = Mᵀ ^ k :=
MulOpposite.op_injective <| map_pow (transposeRingEquiv m α) M k
theorem transpose_list_prod [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (l : List (Matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᵀ = (l.map transpose).reverse.prod :=
(transposeRingEquiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
variable (R m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeAlgEquiv [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Algebra R α] :
Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv,
transposeRingEquiv m α with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
commutes' := fun r => by
simp only [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_transpose, MulOpposite.algebraMap_apply] }
variable {R m α}
end Transpose
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 1,918 | 1,920 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Coeff
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
/-!
# Formal power series in one variable - Truncation
`PowerSeries.trunc n φ` truncates a (univariate) formal power series
to the polynomial that has the same coefficients as `φ`, for all `m < n`,
and `0` otherwise.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section Trunc
variable [Semiring R]
open Finset Nat
/-- The `n`th truncation of a formal power series to a polynomial -/
def trunc (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : R[X] :=
∑ m ∈ Ico 0 n, Polynomial.monomial m (coeff R m φ)
theorem coeff_trunc (m) (n) (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
(trunc n φ).coeff m = if m < n then coeff R m φ else 0 := by
simp [trunc, Polynomial.coeff_sum, Polynomial.coeff_monomial, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
@[simp]
theorem trunc_zero (n) : trunc n (0 : R⟦X⟧) = 0 :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, LinearMap.map_zero, Polynomial.coeff_zero]
split_ifs <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem trunc_one (n) : trunc (n + 1) (1 : R⟦X⟧) = 1 :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_one, Polynomial.coeff_one]
split_ifs with h _ h'
· rfl
· rfl
· subst h'; simp at h
· rfl
@[simp]
theorem trunc_C (n) (a : R) : trunc (n + 1) (C R a) = Polynomial.C a :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_C, Polynomial.coeff_C]
split_ifs with H <;> first |rfl|try simp_all
@[simp]
theorem trunc_add (n) (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) : trunc n (φ + ψ) = trunc n φ + trunc n ψ :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
simp only [coeff_trunc, AddMonoidHom.map_add, Polynomial.coeff_add]
split_ifs with H
· rfl
· rw [zero_add]
theorem trunc_succ (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
trunc n.succ f = trunc n f + Polynomial.monomial n (coeff R n f) := by
rw [trunc, Ico_zero_eq_range, sum_range_succ, trunc, Ico_zero_eq_range]
theorem natDegree_trunc_lt (f : R⟦X⟧) (n) : (trunc (n + 1) f).natDegree < n + 1 := by
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff, natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero]
intros
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [lt_succ, ← not_lt] at h
contradiction
· rfl
@[simp] lemma trunc_zero' {f : R⟦X⟧} : trunc 0 f = 0 := rfl
theorem degree_trunc_lt (f : R⟦X⟧) (n) : (trunc n f).degree < n := by
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero]
intros
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [← not_le] at h
contradiction
· rfl
theorem eval₂_trunc_eq_sum_range {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (s : S) (G : R →+* S) (n) (f : R⟦X⟧) :
(trunc n f).eval₂ G s = ∑ i ∈ range n, G (coeff R i f) * s ^ i := by
cases n with
| zero =>
rw [trunc_zero', range_zero, sum_empty, eval₂_zero]
| succ n =>
have := natDegree_trunc_lt f n
rw [eval₂_eq_sum_range' (hn := this)]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro _ h
rw [mem_range] at h
congr
rw [coeff_trunc, if_pos h]
@[simp] theorem trunc_X (n) : trunc (n + 2) X = (Polynomial.X : R[X]) := by
ext d
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_X]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [h₂, coeff_X_one]
· rw [coeff_X_of_ne_one h₂]
· rw [coeff_X_of_ne_one]
intro hd
apply h₁
rw [hd]
| exact n.one_lt_succ_succ
lemma trunc_X_of {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : trunc n X = (Polynomial.X : R[X]) := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n =>
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact trunc_X n
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Trunc.lean | 122 | 132 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Praneeth Kolichala. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Praneeth Kolichala
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.BinaryRec
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
import Mathlib.Tactic.GeneralizeProofs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
/-!
# Additional properties of binary recursion on `Nat`
This file documents additional properties of binary recursion,
which allows us to more easily work with operations which do depend
on the number of leading zeros in the binary representation of `n`.
For example, we can more easily work with `Nat.bits` and `Nat.size`.
See also: `Nat.bitwise`, `Nat.pow` (for various lemmas about `size` and `shiftLeft`/`shiftRight`),
and `Nat.digits`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
-- Once we're in the `Nat` namespace, `xor` will inconveniently resolve to `Nat.xor`.
/-- `bxor` denotes the `xor` function i.e. the exclusive-or function on type `Bool`. -/
local notation "bxor" => xor
namespace Nat
universe u
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- `boddDiv2 n` returns a 2-tuple of type `(Bool, Nat)` where the `Bool` value indicates whether
`n` is odd or not and the `Nat` value returns `⌊n/2⌋` -/
def boddDiv2 : ℕ → Bool × ℕ
| 0 => (false, 0)
| succ n =>
match boddDiv2 n with
| (false, m) => (true, m)
| (true, m) => (false, succ m)
/-- `div2 n = ⌊n/2⌋` the greatest integer smaller than `n/2` -/
def div2 (n : ℕ) : ℕ := (boddDiv2 n).2
/-- `bodd n` returns `true` if `n` is odd -/
def bodd (n : ℕ) : Bool := (boddDiv2 n).1
@[simp] lemma bodd_zero : bodd 0 = false := rfl
@[simp] lemma bodd_one : bodd 1 = true := rfl
lemma bodd_two : bodd 2 = false := rfl
@[simp]
lemma bodd_succ (n : ℕ) : bodd (succ n) = not (bodd n) := by
simp only [bodd, boddDiv2]
let ⟨b,m⟩ := boddDiv2 n
cases b <;> rfl
@[simp]
lemma bodd_add (m n : ℕ) : bodd (m + n) = bxor (bodd m) (bodd n) := by
induction n
case zero => simp
case succ n ih => simp [← Nat.add_assoc, Bool.xor_not, ih]
@[simp]
lemma bodd_mul (m n : ℕ) : bodd (m * n) = (bodd m && bodd n) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n IH =>
simp only [mul_succ, bodd_add, IH, bodd_succ]
cases bodd m <;> cases bodd n <;> rfl
lemma mod_two_of_bodd (n : ℕ) : n % 2 = (bodd n).toNat := by
have := congr_arg bodd (mod_add_div n 2)
simp? [not] at this says
simp only [bodd_add, bodd_mul, bodd_succ, not, bodd_zero, Bool.false_and, Bool.bne_false]
at this
have _ : ∀ b, and false b = false := by
intro b
cases b <;> rfl
have _ : ∀ b, bxor b false = b := by
intro b
cases b <;> rfl
rw [← this]
rcases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with h | h <;> rw [h] <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma div2_zero : div2 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma div2_one : div2 1 = 0 := rfl
lemma div2_two : div2 2 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma div2_succ (n : ℕ) : div2 (n + 1) = cond (bodd n) (succ (div2 n)) (div2 n) := by
simp only [bodd, boddDiv2, div2]
rcases boddDiv2 n with ⟨_|_, _⟩ <;> simp
attribute [local simp] Nat.add_comm Nat.add_assoc Nat.add_left_comm Nat.mul_comm Nat.mul_assoc
lemma bodd_add_div2 : ∀ n, (bodd n).toNat + 2 * div2 n = n
| 0 => rfl
| succ n => by
simp only [bodd_succ, Bool.cond_not, div2_succ, Nat.mul_comm]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (congr_arg succ (bodd_add_div2 n))
cases bodd n
· simp
· simp; omega
lemma div2_val (n) : div2 n = n / 2 := by
refine Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left (by decide)
(Nat.add_left_cancel (Eq.trans ?_ (Nat.mod_add_div n 2).symm))
rw [mod_two_of_bodd, bodd_add_div2]
lemma bit_decomp (n : Nat) : bit (bodd n) (div2 n) = n :=
(bit_val _ _).trans <| (Nat.add_comm _ _).trans <| bodd_add_div2 _
lemma bit_zero : bit false 0 = 0 :=
rfl
/-- `shiftLeft' b m n` performs a left shift of `m` `n` times
and adds the bit `b` as the least significant bit each time.
Returns the corresponding natural number -/
def shiftLeft' (b : Bool) (m : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => m
| n + 1 => bit b (shiftLeft' b m n)
@[simp]
lemma shiftLeft'_false : ∀ n, shiftLeft' false m n = m <<< n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
have : 2 * (m * 2^n) = 2^(n+1)*m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_assoc, ← Nat.pow_succ]; simp
simp [shiftLeft_eq, shiftLeft', bit_val, shiftLeft'_false, this]
/-- Lean takes the unprimed name for `Nat.shiftLeft_eq m n : m <<< n = m * 2 ^ n`. -/
@[simp] lemma shiftLeft_eq' (m n : Nat) : shiftLeft m n = m <<< n := rfl
@[simp] lemma shiftRight_eq (m n : Nat) : shiftRight m n = m >>> n := rfl
lemma binaryRec_decreasing (h : n ≠ 0) : div2 n < n := by
rw [div2_val]
apply (div_lt_iff_lt_mul <| succ_pos 1).2
have := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ_self 1)
(lt_of_le_of_ne n.zero_le h.symm)
rwa [Nat.mul_one] at this
/-- `size n` : Returns the size of a natural number in
bits i.e. the length of its binary representation -/
def size : ℕ → ℕ :=
binaryRec 0 fun _ _ => succ
/-- `bits n` returns a list of Bools which correspond to the binary representation of n, where
the head of the list represents the least significant bit -/
def bits : ℕ → List Bool :=
binaryRec [] fun b _ IH => b :: IH
/-- `ldiff a b` performs bitwise set difference. For each corresponding
pair of bits taken as booleans, say `aᵢ` and `bᵢ`, it applies the
boolean operation `aᵢ ∧ ¬bᵢ` to obtain the `iᵗʰ` bit of the result. -/
def ldiff : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ :=
bitwise fun a b => a && not b
/-! bitwise ops -/
lemma bodd_bit (b n) : bodd (bit b n) = b := by
rw [bit_val]
simp only [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.add_comm, bodd_add, bodd_mul, bodd_succ, bodd_zero, Bool.not_false,
Bool.not_true, Bool.and_false, Bool.xor_false]
cases b <;> cases bodd n <;> rfl
lemma div2_bit (b n) : div2 (bit b n) = n := by
rw [bit_val, div2_val, Nat.add_comm, add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt, Nat.zero_add]
<;> cases b
<;> decide
lemma shiftLeft'_add (b m n) : ∀ k, shiftLeft' b m (n + k) = shiftLeft' b (shiftLeft' b m n) k
| 0 => rfl
| k + 1 => congr_arg (bit b) (shiftLeft'_add b m n k)
lemma shiftLeft'_sub (b m) : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → shiftLeft' b m (n - k) = (shiftLeft' b m n) >>> k
| _, 0, _ => rfl
| n + 1, k + 1, h => by
rw [succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, shiftLeft', Nat.add_comm, shiftRight_add]
simp only [shiftLeft'_sub, Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h, shiftRight_succ, shiftRight_zero]
simp [← div2_val, div2_bit]
lemma shiftLeft_sub : ∀ (m : Nat) {n k}, k ≤ n → m <<< (n - k) = (m <<< n) >>> k :=
fun _ _ _ hk => by simp only [← shiftLeft'_false, shiftLeft'_sub false _ hk]
lemma bodd_eq_one_and_ne_zero : ∀ n, bodd n = (1 &&& n != 0)
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
| n + 2 => by simpa using bodd_eq_one_and_ne_zero n
lemma testBit_bit_succ (m b n) : testBit (bit b n) (succ m) = testBit n m := by
have : bodd (((bit b n) >>> 1) >>> m) = bodd (n >>> m) := by
simp only [shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
simp [← div2_val, div2_bit]
rw [← shiftRight_add, Nat.add_comm] at this
simp only [bodd_eq_one_and_ne_zero] at this
exact this
/-! ### `boddDiv2_eq` and `bodd` -/
@[simp]
theorem boddDiv2_eq (n : ℕ) : boddDiv2 n = (bodd n, div2 n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem div2_bit0 (n) : div2 (2 * n) = n :=
div2_bit false n
-- simp can prove this
theorem div2_bit1 (n) : div2 (2 * n + 1) = n :=
div2_bit true n
/-! ### `bit0` and `bit1` -/
theorem bit_add : ∀ (b : Bool) (n m : ℕ), bit b (n + m) = bit false n + bit b m
| true, _, _ => by dsimp [bit]; omega
| false, _, _ => by dsimp [bit]; omega
theorem bit_add' : ∀ (b : Bool) (n m : ℕ), bit b (n + m) = bit b n + bit false m
| true, _, _ => by dsimp [bit]; omega
| false, _, _ => by dsimp [bit]; omega
theorem bit_ne_zero (b) {n} (h : n ≠ 0) : bit b n ≠ 0 := by
cases b <;> dsimp [bit] <;> omega
@[simp]
theorem bitCasesOn_bit0 {motive : ℕ → Sort u} (H : ∀ b n, motive (bit b n)) (n : ℕ) :
bitCasesOn (2 * n) H = H false n :=
bitCasesOn_bit H false n
@[simp]
theorem bitCasesOn_bit1 {motive : ℕ → Sort u} (H : ∀ b n, motive (bit b n)) (n : ℕ) :
bitCasesOn (2 * n + 1) H = H true n :=
bitCasesOn_bit H true n
theorem bit_cases_on_injective {motive : ℕ → Sort u} :
Function.Injective fun H : ∀ b n, motive (bit b n) => fun n => bitCasesOn n H := by
intro H₁ H₂ h
ext b n
simpa only [bitCasesOn_bit] using congr_fun h (bit b n)
@[simp]
theorem bit_cases_on_inj {motive : ℕ → Sort u} (H₁ H₂ : ∀ b n, motive (bit b n)) :
((fun n => bitCasesOn n H₁) = fun n => bitCasesOn n H₂) ↔ H₁ = H₂ :=
bit_cases_on_injective.eq_iff
lemma bit_le : ∀ (b : Bool) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → bit b m ≤ bit b n
| true, _, _, h => by dsimp [bit]; omega
| false, _, _, h => by dsimp [bit]; omega
lemma bit_lt_bit (a b) (h : m < n) : bit a m < bit b n := calc
bit a m < 2 * n := by cases a <;> dsimp [bit] <;> omega
_ ≤ bit b n := by cases b <;> dsimp [bit] <;> omega
@[simp]
theorem zero_bits : bits 0 = [] := by simp [Nat.bits]
@[simp]
theorem bits_append_bit (n : ℕ) (b : Bool) (hn : n = 0 → b = true) :
(bit b n).bits = b :: n.bits := by
rw [Nat.bits, Nat.bits, binaryRec_eq]
simpa
@[simp]
theorem bit0_bits (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (2 * n).bits = false :: n.bits :=
bits_append_bit n false fun hn' => absurd hn' hn
@[simp]
theorem bit1_bits (n : ℕ) : (2 * n + 1).bits = true :: n.bits :=
bits_append_bit n true fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_bits : Nat.bits 1 = [true] := by
convert bit1_bits 0
simp
-- TODO Find somewhere this can live.
-- example : bits 3423 = [true, true, true, true, true, false, true, false, true, false, true, true]
-- := by norm_num
theorem bodd_eq_bits_head (n : ℕ) : n.bodd = n.bits.headI := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec' with
| z => simp
| f _ _ h _ => simp [bodd_bit, bits_append_bit _ _ h]
theorem div2_bits_eq_tail (n : ℕ) : n.div2.bits = n.bits.tail := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec' with
| z => simp
| f _ _ h _ => simp [div2_bit, bits_append_bit _ _ h]
end Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Bits.lean | 617 | 619 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Basic properties of holors
Holors are indexed collections of tensor coefficients. Confusingly,
they are often called tensors in physics and in the neural network
community.
A holor is simply a multidimensional array of values. The size of a
holor is specified by a `List ℕ`, whose length is called the dimension
of the holor.
The tensor product of `x₁ : Holor α ds₁` and `x₂ : Holor α ds₂` is the
holor given by `(x₁ ⊗ x₂) (i₁ ++ i₂) = x₁ i₁ * x₂ i₂`. A holor is "of
rank at most 1" if it is a tensor product of one-dimensional holors.
The CP rank of a holor `x` is the smallest N such that `x` is the sum
of N holors of rank at most 1.
Based on the tensor library found in <https://www.isa-afp.org/entries/Deep_Learning.html>
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor_rank_decomposition>
-/
universe u
open List
/-- `HolorIndex ds` is the type of valid index tuples used to identify an entry of a holor
of dimensions `ds`. -/
def HolorIndex (ds : List ℕ) : Type :=
{ is : List ℕ // Forall₂ (· < ·) is ds }
namespace HolorIndex
variable {ds₁ ds₂ ds₃ : List ℕ}
/-- Take the first elements of a `HolorIndex`. -/
def take : ∀ {ds₁ : List ℕ}, HolorIndex (ds₁ ++ ds₂) → HolorIndex ds₁
| ds, is => ⟨List.take (length ds) is.1, forall₂_take_append is.1 ds ds₂ is.2⟩
/-- Drop the first elements of a `HolorIndex`. -/
def drop : ∀ {ds₁ : List ℕ}, HolorIndex (ds₁ ++ ds₂) → HolorIndex ds₂
| ds, is => ⟨List.drop (length ds) is.1, forall₂_drop_append is.1 ds ds₂ is.2⟩
theorem cast_type (is : List ℕ) (eq : ds₁ = ds₂) (h : Forall₂ (· < ·) is ds₁) :
(cast (congr_arg HolorIndex eq) ⟨is, h⟩).val = is := by subst eq; rfl
/-- Right associator for `HolorIndex` -/
def assocRight : HolorIndex (ds₁ ++ ds₂ ++ ds₃) → HolorIndex (ds₁ ++ (ds₂ ++ ds₃)) :=
cast (congr_arg HolorIndex (append_assoc ds₁ ds₂ ds₃))
/-- Left associator for `HolorIndex` -/
def assocLeft : HolorIndex (ds₁ ++ (ds₂ ++ ds₃)) → HolorIndex (ds₁ ++ ds₂ ++ ds₃) :=
cast (congr_arg HolorIndex (append_assoc ds₁ ds₂ ds₃).symm)
theorem take_take : ∀ t : HolorIndex (ds₁ ++ ds₂ ++ ds₃), t.assocRight.take = t.take.take
| ⟨is, h⟩ =>
Subtype.eq <| by
simp [assocRight, take, cast_type, List.take_take, Nat.le_add_right, min_eq_left]
theorem drop_take : ∀ t : HolorIndex (ds₁ ++ ds₂ ++ ds₃), t.assocRight.drop.take = t.take.drop
| ⟨is, h⟩ => Subtype.eq (by simp [assocRight, take, drop, cast_type, List.drop_take])
theorem drop_drop : ∀ t : HolorIndex (ds₁ ++ ds₂ ++ ds₃), t.assocRight.drop.drop = t.drop
| ⟨is, h⟩ => Subtype.eq (by simp [add_comm, assocRight, drop, cast_type, List.drop_drop])
end HolorIndex
/-- Holor (indexed collections of tensor coefficients) -/
def Holor (α : Type u) (ds : List ℕ) :=
HolorIndex ds → α
namespace Holor
variable {α : Type} {d : ℕ} {ds : List ℕ} {ds₁ : List ℕ} {ds₂ : List ℕ} {ds₃ : List ℕ}
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Holor α ds) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
instance [Zero α] : Zero (Holor α ds) :=
⟨fun _ => 0⟩
instance [Add α] : Add (Holor α ds) :=
⟨fun x y t => x t + y t⟩
instance [Neg α] : Neg (Holor α ds) :=
⟨fun a t => -a t⟩
instance [AddSemigroup α] : AddSemigroup (Holor α ds) := Pi.addSemigroup
instance [AddCommSemigroup α] : AddCommSemigroup (Holor α ds) := Pi.addCommSemigroup
instance [AddMonoid α] : AddMonoid (Holor α ds) := Pi.addMonoid
instance [AddCommMonoid α] : AddCommMonoid (Holor α ds) := Pi.addCommMonoid
instance [AddGroup α] : AddGroup (Holor α ds) := Pi.addGroup
instance [AddCommGroup α] : AddCommGroup (Holor α ds) := Pi.addCommGroup
-- scalar product
instance [Mul α] : SMul α (Holor α ds) :=
⟨fun a x => fun t => a * x t⟩
instance [Semiring α] : Module α (Holor α ds) := Pi.module _ _ _
/-- The tensor product of two holors. -/
def mul [Mul α] (x : Holor α ds₁) (y : Holor α ds₂) : Holor α (ds₁ ++ ds₂) := fun t =>
x t.take * y t.drop
local infixl:70 " ⊗ " => mul
theorem cast_type (eq : ds₁ = ds₂) (a : Holor α ds₁) :
cast (congr_arg (Holor α) eq) a = fun t => a (cast (congr_arg HolorIndex eq.symm) t) := by
subst eq; rfl
/-- Right associator for `Holor` -/
def assocRight : Holor α (ds₁ ++ ds₂ ++ ds₃) → Holor α (ds₁ ++ (ds₂ ++ ds₃)) :=
cast (congr_arg (Holor α) (append_assoc ds₁ ds₂ ds₃))
/-- Left associator for `Holor` -/
def assocLeft : Holor α (ds₁ ++ (ds₂ ++ ds₃)) → Holor α (ds₁ ++ ds₂ ++ ds₃) :=
cast (congr_arg (Holor α) (append_assoc ds₁ ds₂ ds₃).symm)
theorem mul_assoc0 [Semigroup α] (x : Holor α ds₁) (y : Holor α ds₂) (z : Holor α ds₃) :
x ⊗ y ⊗ z = (x ⊗ (y ⊗ z)).assocLeft :=
funext fun t : HolorIndex (ds₁ ++ ds₂ ++ ds₃) => by
rw [assocLeft]
unfold mul
rw [mul_assoc, ← HolorIndex.take_take, ← HolorIndex.drop_take, ← HolorIndex.drop_drop,
cast_type]
· rfl
rw [append_assoc]
theorem mul_assoc [Semigroup α] (x : Holor α ds₁) (y : Holor α ds₂) (z : Holor α ds₃) :
HEq (mul (mul x y) z) (mul x (mul y z)) := by simp [cast_heq, mul_assoc0, assocLeft]
theorem mul_left_distrib [Distrib α] (x : Holor α ds₁) (y : Holor α ds₂) (z : Holor α ds₂) :
x ⊗ (y + z) = x ⊗ y + x ⊗ z := funext fun t => left_distrib (x t.take) (y t.drop) (z t.drop)
theorem mul_right_distrib [Distrib α] (x : Holor α ds₁) (y : Holor α ds₁) (z : Holor α ds₂) :
(x + y) ⊗ z = x ⊗ z + y ⊗ z := funext fun t => add_mul (x t.take) (y t.take) (z t.drop)
@[simp]
nonrec theorem zero_mul {α : Type} [MulZeroClass α] (x : Holor α ds₂) : (0 : Holor α ds₁) ⊗ x = 0 :=
funext fun t => zero_mul (x (HolorIndex.drop t))
@[simp]
nonrec theorem mul_zero {α : Type} [MulZeroClass α] (x : Holor α ds₁) : x ⊗ (0 : Holor α ds₂) = 0 :=
funext fun t => mul_zero (x (HolorIndex.take t))
theorem mul_scalar_mul [Mul α] (x : Holor α []) (y : Holor α ds) :
x ⊗ y = x ⟨[], Forall₂.nil⟩ • y := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [mul, SMul.smul, HolorIndex.take, HolorIndex.drop,
HSMul.hSMul]
-- holor slices
/-- A slice is a subholor consisting of all entries with initial index i. -/
def slice (x : Holor α (d :: ds)) (i : ℕ) (h : i < d) : Holor α ds := fun is : HolorIndex ds =>
x ⟨i :: is.1, Forall₂.cons h is.2⟩
/-- The 1-dimensional "unit" holor with 1 in the `j`th position. -/
def unitVec [Monoid α] [AddMonoid α] (d : ℕ) (j : ℕ) : Holor α [d] := fun ti =>
if ti.1 = [j] then 1 else 0
theorem holor_index_cons_decomp (p : HolorIndex (d :: ds) → Prop) :
∀ t : HolorIndex (d :: ds),
(∀ i is, ∀ h : t.1 = i :: is, p ⟨i :: is, by rw [← h]; exact t.2⟩) → p t
| ⟨[], hforall₂⟩, _ => absurd (forall₂_nil_left_iff.1 hforall₂) (cons_ne_nil d ds)
| ⟨i :: is, _⟩, hp => hp i is rfl
/-- Two holors are equal if all their slices are equal. -/
theorem slice_eq (x : Holor α (d :: ds)) (y : Holor α (d :: ds)) (h : slice x = slice y) : x = y :=
funext fun t : HolorIndex (d :: ds) =>
holor_index_cons_decomp (fun t => x t = y t) t fun i is hiis =>
have hiisdds : Forall₂ (· < ·) (i :: is) (d :: ds) := by rw [← hiis]; exact t.2
have hid : i < d := (forall₂_cons.1 hiisdds).1
have hisds : Forall₂ (· < ·) is ds := (forall₂_cons.1 hiisdds).2
calc
x ⟨i :: is, _⟩ = slice x i hid ⟨is, hisds⟩ := congr_arg x (Subtype.eq rfl)
_ = slice y i hid ⟨is, hisds⟩ := by rw [h]
_ = y ⟨i :: is, _⟩ := congr_arg y (Subtype.eq rfl)
theorem slice_unitVec_mul [Semiring α] {i : ℕ} {j : ℕ} (hid : i < d) (x : Holor α ds) :
slice (unitVec d j ⊗ x) i hid = if i = j then x else 0 :=
funext fun t : HolorIndex ds =>
if h : i = j then by simp [slice, mul, HolorIndex.take, unitVec, HolorIndex.drop, h]
else by simp [slice, mul, HolorIndex.take, unitVec, HolorIndex.drop, h]; rfl
theorem slice_add [Add α] (i : ℕ) (hid : i < d) (x : Holor α (d :: ds)) (y : Holor α (d :: ds)) :
slice x i hid + slice y i hid = slice (x + y) i hid :=
funext fun t => by simp [slice, (· + ·), Add.add]
theorem slice_zero [Zero α] (i : ℕ) (hid : i < d) : slice (0 : Holor α (d :: ds)) i hid = 0 :=
rfl
theorem slice_sum [AddCommMonoid α] {β : Type} (i : ℕ) (hid : i < d) (s : Finset β)
(f : β → Holor α (d :: ds)) : (∑ x ∈ s, slice (f x) i hid) = slice (∑ x ∈ s, f x) i hid := by
letI := Classical.decEq β
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· simp [slice_zero]
· intro _ _ h_not_in ih
rw [Finset.sum_insert h_not_in, ih, slice_add, Finset.sum_insert h_not_in]
/-- The original holor can be recovered from its slices by multiplying with unit vectors and
summing up. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_unitVec_mul_slice [Semiring α] (x : Holor α (d :: ds)) :
(∑ i ∈ (Finset.range d).attach,
unitVec d i ⊗ slice x i (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (Finset.mem_range.1 i.prop))) =
x := by
apply slice_eq _ _ _
ext i hid
rw [← slice_sum]
simp only [slice_unitVec_mul hid]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (Subtype.mk i <| Finset.mem_range.2 hid)]
· simp
· intro (b : { x // x ∈ Finset.range d }) (_ : b ∈ (Finset.range d).attach) (hbi : b ≠ ⟨i, _⟩)
have hbi' : i ≠ b := by simpa only [Ne, Subtype.ext_iff, Subtype.coe_mk] using hbi.symm
simp [hbi']
· intro (hid' : Subtype.mk i _ ∉ Finset.attach (Finset.range d))
exfalso
exact absurd (Finset.mem_attach _ _) hid'
-- CP rank
/-- `CPRankMax1 x` means `x` has CP rank at most 1, that is,
it is the tensor product of 1-dimensional holors. -/
inductive CPRankMax1 [Mul α] : ∀ {ds}, Holor α ds → Prop
| nil (x : Holor α []) : CPRankMax1 x
| cons {d} {ds} (x : Holor α [d]) (y : Holor α ds) : CPRankMax1 y → CPRankMax1 (x ⊗ y)
/-- `CPRankMax N x` means `x` has CP rank at most `N`, that is,
it can be written as the sum of N holors of rank at most 1. -/
inductive CPRankMax [Mul α] [AddMonoid α] : ℕ → ∀ {ds}, Holor α ds → Prop
| zero {ds} : CPRankMax 0 (0 : Holor α ds)
| succ (n) {ds} (x : Holor α ds) (y : Holor α ds) :
CPRankMax1 x → CPRankMax n y → CPRankMax (n + 1) (x + y)
theorem cprankMax_nil [Mul α] [AddMonoid α] (x : Holor α nil) : CPRankMax 1 x := by
have h := CPRankMax.succ 0 x 0 (CPRankMax1.nil x) CPRankMax.zero
rwa [add_zero x, zero_add] at h
theorem cprankMax_1 [Mul α] [AddMonoid α] {x : Holor α ds} (h : CPRankMax1 x) :
CPRankMax 1 x := by
have h' := CPRankMax.succ 0 x 0 h CPRankMax.zero
rwa [zero_add, add_zero] at h'
theorem cprankMax_add [Mul α] [AddMonoid α] :
∀ {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ} {x : Holor α ds} {y : Holor α ds},
CPRankMax m x → CPRankMax n y → CPRankMax (m + n) (x + y)
| 0, n, x, y, hx, hy => by
match hx with
| CPRankMax.zero => simp only [zero_add, hy]
| m + 1, n, _, y, CPRankMax.succ _ x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂, hy => by
suffices CPRankMax (m + n + 1) (x₁ + (x₂ + y)) by
simpa only [add_comm, add_assoc, add_left_comm] using this
apply CPRankMax.succ
· assumption
· exact cprankMax_add hx₂ hy
theorem cprankMax_mul [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] :
∀ (n : ℕ) (x : Holor α [d]) (y : Holor α ds), CPRankMax n y → CPRankMax n (x ⊗ y)
| 0, x, _, CPRankMax.zero => by simp [mul_zero x, CPRankMax.zero]
| n + 1, x, _, CPRankMax.succ _ y₁ y₂ hy₁ hy₂ => by
rw [mul_left_distrib]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
apply cprankMax_add
· exact cprankMax_1 (CPRankMax1.cons _ _ hy₁)
· exact cprankMax_mul _ x y₂ hy₂
theorem cprankMax_sum [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] {β} {n : ℕ} (s : Finset β)
(f : β → Holor α ds) : (∀ x ∈ s, CPRankMax n (f x)) → CPRankMax (s.card * n) (∑ x ∈ s, f x) :=
letI := Classical.decEq β
Finset.induction_on s (by simp [CPRankMax.zero])
(by
intro x s (h_x_notin_s : x ∉ s) ih h_cprank
| simp only [Finset.sum_insert h_x_notin_s, Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem h_x_notin_s]
rw [Nat.right_distrib]
simp only [Nat.one_mul, Nat.add_comm]
have ih' : CPRankMax (Finset.card s * n) (∑ x ∈ s, f x) := by
apply ih
intro (x : β) (h_x_in_s : x ∈ s)
simp only [h_cprank, Finset.mem_insert_of_mem, h_x_in_s]
exact cprankMax_add (h_cprank x (Finset.mem_insert_self x s)) ih')
theorem cprankMax_upper_bound [Semiring α] : ∀ {ds}, ∀ x : Holor α ds, CPRankMax ds.prod x
| [], x => cprankMax_nil x
| d :: ds, x => by
have h_summands :
| Mathlib/Data/Holor.lean | 288 | 300 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
/-!
# Odd Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the analytic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaOdd a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, sgn (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`sinZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s`.
The term for `n = -a` in the first sum is understood as 0 if `a` is an integer, as is the term for
`n = 0` in the second sum (for all `a`). Note that these functions are differentiable everywhere,
unlike their even counterparts which have poles.
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
analytic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd`: the completed Hurwitz zeta function
* `completedSinZeta`: the completed cosine zeta function
* `differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd` and `differentiable_completedSinZeta`:
differentiability on `ℂ`
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = completedSinZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd` and `hasSum_nat_sinZeta`: relation between
the zeta functions and corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex hiding abs_of_nonneg
open CharZero Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Variant of `jacobiTheta₂'` which we introduce to simplify some formulae. -/
def jacobiTheta₂'' (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ :=
cexp (π * I * z ^ 2 * τ) * (jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ / (2 * π * I) + z * jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ)
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_conj (z τ : ℂ) :
conj (jacobiTheta₂'' z τ) = jacobiTheta₂'' (conj z) (-conj τ) := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← exp_conj, map_ofNat, div_neg,
neg_div, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left]
/-- Restatement of `jacobiTheta₂'_add_left'`: the function `jacobiTheta₂''` is 1-periodic in `z`. -/
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_add_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (z + 1) τ = jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp only [jacobiTheta₂'', add_mul z 1, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂'_add_left', jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
generalize jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ = J
generalize jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ = J'
-- clear denominator
simp_rw [div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc]
refine congr_arg (· / (2 * π * I)) ?_
-- get all exponential terms to left
rw [mul_left_comm _ (cexp _), ← mul_add, mul_assoc (cexp _), ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc (cexp _),
← Complex.exp_add]
congrm (cexp ?_ * ?_) <;> ring
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (-z) τ = -jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_div, -neg_add_rev, ← neg_add]
lemma jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation' (z τ : ℂ) :
jacobiTheta₂' z τ = (-2 * π) / (-I * τ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) * jacobiTheta₂'' z (-1 / τ) := by
| rcases eq_or_ne τ 0 with rfl | hτ
· rw [jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simp), mul_zero, zero_cpow (by norm_num), div_zero, zero_mul]
have aux1 : (-2 * π : ℂ) / (2 * π * I) = I := by
rw [div_eq_iff two_pi_I_ne_zero, mul_comm I, mul_assoc _ I I, I_mul_I, neg_mul, mul_neg,
mul_one]
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation, ← mul_one_div _ τ, mul_right_comm _ (cexp _),
(by rw [cpow_one, ← div_div, div_self (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero)] :
1 / τ = -I / (-I * τ) ^ (1 : ℂ)), div_mul_div_comm,
← cpow_add _ _ (mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero) hτ), ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 + 1 : ℂ) = 3 / 2), mul_assoc (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _),
← mul_one_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_comm _ (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _)]
congr 1
rw [jacobiTheta₂'', div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc,
← div_mul_eq_mul_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_assoc, aux1, mul_div z (-1), mul_neg_one, neg_div τ z,
jacobiTheta₂_neg_left, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_mul, ← mul_neg, ← mul_neg,
mul_div, mul_neg_one, neg_div, neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_div]
congr 2
rw [neg_sub, ← sub_eq_neg_add, mul_comm _ (_ * I), ← mul_assoc]
/-- Odd Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the odd part of the completed
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaOdd.lean | 83 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn, Joachim Breitner
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.FreeGroup.IsFreeGroup
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
/-!
# The coproduct (a.k.a. the free product) of groups or monoids
Given an `ι`-indexed family `M` of monoids,
we define their coproduct (a.k.a. free product) `Monoid.CoprodI M`.
As usual, we use the suffix `I` for an indexed (co)product,
leaving `Coprod` for the coproduct of two monoids.
When `ι` and all `M i` have decidable equality,
the free product bijects with the type `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` of reduced words.
This bijection is constructed
by defining an action of `Monoid.CoprodI M` on `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`.
When `M i` are all groups, `Monoid.CoprodI M` is also a group
(and the coproduct in the category of groups).
## Main definitions
- `Monoid.CoprodI M`: the free product, defined as a quotient of a free monoid.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.of {i} : M i →* Monoid.CoprodI M`.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.lift : (∀ {i}, M i →* N) ≃ (Monoid.CoprodI M →* N)`: the universal property.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`: the type of reduced words.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.Word.equiv M : Monoid.CoprodI M ≃ word M`.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.NeWord M i j`: an inductive description of non-empty words
with first letter from `M i` and last letter from `M j`,
together with an API (`singleton`, `append`, `head`, `tail`, `to_word`, `Prod`, `inv`).
Used in the proof of the Ping-Pong-lemma.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.lift_injective_of_ping_pong`: The Ping-Pong-lemma,
proving injectivity of the `lift`. See the documentation of that theorem for more information.
## Remarks
There are many answers to the question "what is the coproduct of a family `M` of monoids?",
and they are all equivalent but not obviously equivalent.
We provide two answers.
The first, almost tautological answer is given by `Monoid.CoprodI M`,
which is a quotient of the type of words in the alphabet `Σ i, M i`.
It's straightforward to define and easy to prove its universal property.
But this answer is not completely satisfactory,
because it's difficult to tell when two elements `x y : Monoid.CoprodI M` are distinct
since `Monoid.CoprodI M` is defined as a quotient.
The second, maximally efficient answer is given by `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`.
An element of `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` is a word in the alphabet `Σ i, M i`,
where the letter `⟨i, 1⟩` doesn't occur and no adjacent letters share an index `i`.
Since we only work with reduced words, there is no need for quotienting,
and it is easy to tell when two elements are distinct.
However it's not obvious that this is even a monoid!
We prove that every element of `Monoid.CoprodI M` can be represented by a unique reduced word,
i.e. `Monoid.CoprodI M` and `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` are equivalent types.
This means that `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` can be given a monoid structure,
and it lets us tell when two elements of `Monoid.CoprodI M` are distinct.
There is also a completely tautological, maximally inefficient answer
given by `MonCat.Colimits.ColimitType`.
Whereas `Monoid.CoprodI M` at least ensures that
(any instance of) associativity holds by reflexivity,
in this answer associativity holds because of quotienting.
Yet another answer, which is constructively more satisfying,
could be obtained by showing that `Monoid.CoprodI.Rel` is confluent.
## References
[van der Waerden, *Free products of groups*][MR25465]
-/
open Set
variable {ι : Type*} (M : ι → Type*) [∀ i, Monoid (M i)]
/-- A relation on the free monoid on alphabet `Σ i, M i`,
relating `⟨i, 1⟩` with `1` and `⟨i, x⟩ * ⟨i, y⟩` with `⟨i, x * y⟩`. -/
inductive Monoid.CoprodI.Rel : FreeMonoid (Σ i, M i) → FreeMonoid (Σ i, M i) → Prop
| of_one (i : ι) : Monoid.CoprodI.Rel (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, 1⟩) 1
| of_mul {i : ι} (x y : M i) :
Monoid.CoprodI.Rel (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, x⟩ * FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, y⟩) (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, x * y⟩)
/-- The free product (categorical coproduct) of an indexed family of monoids. -/
def Monoid.CoprodI : Type _ := (conGen (Monoid.CoprodI.Rel M)).Quotient
-- The `Monoid` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : Monoid (Monoid.CoprodI M) := by
delta Monoid.CoprodI; infer_instance
instance : Inhabited (Monoid.CoprodI M) :=
⟨1⟩
namespace Monoid.CoprodI
/-- The type of reduced words. A reduced word cannot contain a letter `1`, and no two adjacent
letters can come from the same summand. -/
@[ext]
structure Word where
/-- A `Word` is a `List (Σ i, M i)`, such that `1` is not in the list, and no
two adjacent letters are from the same summand -/
toList : List (Σi, M i)
/-- A reduced word does not contain `1` -/
ne_one : ∀ l ∈ toList, Sigma.snd l ≠ 1
/-- Adjacent letters are not from the same summand. -/
chain_ne : toList.Chain' fun l l' => Sigma.fst l ≠ Sigma.fst l'
variable {M}
/-- The inclusion of a summand into the free product. -/
def of {i : ι} : M i →* CoprodI M where
toFun x := Con.mk' _ (FreeMonoid.of <| Sigma.mk i x)
map_one' := (Con.eq _).mpr (ConGen.Rel.of _ _ (CoprodI.Rel.of_one i))
map_mul' x y := Eq.symm <| (Con.eq _).mpr (ConGen.Rel.of _ _ (CoprodI.Rel.of_mul x y))
theorem of_apply {i} (m : M i) : of m = Con.mk' _ (FreeMonoid.of <| Sigma.mk i m) :=
rfl
variable {N : Type*} [Monoid N]
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
-- Porting note: higher `ext` priority
@[ext 1100]
theorem ext_hom (f g : CoprodI M →* N) (h : ∀ i, f.comp (of : M i →* _) = g.comp of) : f = g :=
(MonoidHom.cancel_right Con.mk'_surjective).mp <|
FreeMonoid.hom_eq fun ⟨i, x⟩ => by
rw [MonoidHom.comp_apply, MonoidHom.comp_apply, ← of_apply]
unfold CoprodI
rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, ← MonoidHom.comp_apply, h]
/-- A map out of the free product corresponds to a family of maps out of the summands. This is the
universal property of the free product, characterizing it as a categorical coproduct. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def lift : (∀ i, M i →* N) ≃ (CoprodI M →* N) where
toFun fi :=
Con.lift _ (FreeMonoid.lift fun p : Σi, M i => fi p.fst p.snd) <|
Con.conGen_le <| by
simp_rw [Con.ker_rel]
rintro _ _ (i | ⟨x, y⟩) <;> simp
invFun f _ := f.comp of
left_inv := by
intro fi
ext i x
rfl
right_inv := by
intro f
ext i x
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_of {N} [Monoid N] (fi : ∀ i, M i →* N) i : (lift fi).comp of = fi i :=
congr_fun (lift.symm_apply_apply fi) i
@[simp]
theorem lift_of {N} [Monoid N] (fi : ∀ i, M i →* N) {i} (m : M i) : lift fi (of m) = fi i m :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift_comp_of ..) m
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_of' {N} [Monoid N] (f : CoprodI M →* N) :
lift (fun i ↦ f.comp (of (i := i))) = f :=
lift.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp]
theorem lift_of' : lift (fun i ↦ (of : M i →* CoprodI M)) = .id (CoprodI M) :=
lift_comp_of' (.id _)
theorem of_leftInverse [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Function.LeftInverse (lift <| Pi.mulSingle i (MonoidHom.id (M i))) of := fun x => by
simp only [lift_of, Pi.mulSingle_eq_same, MonoidHom.id_apply]
theorem of_injective (i : ι) : Function.Injective (of : M i →* _) := by
classical exact (of_leftInverse i).injective
theorem mrange_eq_iSup {N} [Monoid N] (f : ∀ i, M i →* N) :
MonoidHom.mrange (lift f) = ⨆ i, MonoidHom.mrange (f i) := by
rw [lift, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Con.lift_range, FreeMonoid.mrange_lift,
range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range, Submonoid.closure_iUnion]
simp only [MonoidHom.mclosure_range]
theorem lift_mrange_le {N} [Monoid N] (f : ∀ i, M i →* N) {s : Submonoid N} :
MonoidHom.mrange (lift f) ≤ s ↔ ∀ i, MonoidHom.mrange (f i) ≤ s := by
simp [mrange_eq_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_mrange_of : ⨆ i, MonoidHom.mrange (of : M i →* CoprodI M) = ⊤ := by
simp [← mrange_eq_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem mclosure_iUnion_range_of :
Submonoid.closure (⋃ i, Set.range (of : M i →* CoprodI M)) = ⊤ := by
simp [Submonoid.closure_iUnion]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_left {motive : CoprodI M → Prop} (m : CoprodI M) (one : motive 1)
(mul : ∀ {i} (m : M i) x, motive x → motive (of m * x)) : motive m := by
induction m using Submonoid.induction_of_closure_eq_top_left mclosure_iUnion_range_of with
| one => exact one
| mul x hx y ihy =>
obtain ⟨i, m, rfl⟩ : ∃ (i : ι) (m : M i), of m = x := by simpa using hx
exact mul m y ihy
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {motive : CoprodI M → Prop} (m : CoprodI M) (one : motive 1)
(of : ∀ (i) (m : M i), motive (of m))
(mul : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x * y)) : motive m := by
induction m using CoprodI.induction_left with
| one => exact one
| mul m x hx => exact mul _ _ (of _ _) hx
section Group
variable (G : ι → Type*) [∀ i, Group (G i)]
instance : Inv (CoprodI G) where
inv :=
MulOpposite.unop ∘ lift fun i => (of : G i →* _).op.comp (MulEquiv.inv' (G i)).toMonoidHom
theorem inv_def (x : CoprodI G) :
x⁻¹ =
MulOpposite.unop
(lift (fun i => (of : G i →* _).op.comp (MulEquiv.inv' (G i)).toMonoidHom) x) :=
rfl
instance : Group (CoprodI G) :=
{ inv_mul_cancel := by
intro m
rw [inv_def]
induction m using CoprodI.induction_on with
| one => rw [MonoidHom.map_one, MulOpposite.unop_one, one_mul]
| of m ih =>
change of _⁻¹ * of _ = 1
rw [← of.map_mul, inv_mul_cancel, of.map_one]
| mul x y ihx ihy =>
rw [MonoidHom.map_mul, MulOpposite.unop_mul, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc _ x y, ihx, one_mul,
ihy] }
theorem lift_range_le {N} [Group N] (f : ∀ i, G i →* N) {s : Subgroup N}
(h : ∀ i, (f i).range ≤ s) : (lift f).range ≤ s := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
induction x using CoprodI.induction_on with
| one => exact s.one_mem
| of i x =>
simp only [lift_of, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact h i (Set.mem_range_self x)
| mul x y hx hy =>
simp only [map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact s.mul_mem hx hy
theorem range_eq_iSup {N} [Group N] (f : ∀ i, G i →* N) : (lift f).range = ⨆ i, (f i).range := by
apply le_antisymm (lift_range_le _ f fun i => le_iSup (fun i => MonoidHom.range (f i)) i)
apply iSup_le _
rintro i _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨of x, by simp only [lift_of]⟩
end Group
namespace Word
/-- The empty reduced word. -/
@[simps]
def empty : Word M where
toList := []
ne_one := by simp
chain_ne := List.chain'_nil
instance : Inhabited (Word M) :=
⟨empty⟩
/-- A reduced word determines an element of the free product, given by multiplication. -/
def prod (w : Word M) : CoprodI M :=
List.prod (w.toList.map fun l => of l.snd)
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : prod (empty : Word M) = 1 :=
rfl
/-- `fstIdx w` is `some i` if the first letter of `w` is `⟨i, m⟩` with `m : M i`. If `w` is empty
then it's `none`. -/
def fstIdx (w : Word M) : Option ι :=
w.toList.head?.map Sigma.fst
theorem fstIdx_ne_iff {w : Word M} {i} :
fstIdx w ≠ some i ↔ ∀ l ∈ w.toList.head?, i ≠ Sigma.fst l :=
not_iff_not.mp <| by simp [fstIdx]
variable (M)
/-- Given an index `i : ι`, `Pair M i` is the type of pairs `(head, tail)` where `head : M i` and
`tail : Word M`, subject to the constraint that first letter of `tail` can't be `⟨i, m⟩`.
By prepending `head` to `tail`, one obtains a new word. We'll show that any word can be uniquely
obtained in this way. -/
@[ext]
structure Pair (i : ι) where
/-- An element of `M i`, the first letter of the word. -/
head : M i
/-- The remaining letters of the word, excluding the first letter -/
tail : Word M
/-- The index first letter of tail of a `Pair M i` is not equal to `i` -/
fstIdx_ne : fstIdx tail ≠ some i
instance (i : ι) : Inhabited (Pair M i) :=
⟨⟨1, empty, by tauto⟩⟩
variable {M}
/-- Construct a new `Word` without any reduction. The underlying list of
`cons m w _ _` is `⟨_, m⟩::w` -/
@[simps]
def cons {i} (m : M i) (w : Word M) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i) (h1 : m ≠ 1) : Word M :=
{ toList := ⟨i, m⟩ :: w.toList,
ne_one := by
simp only [List.mem_cons]
rintro l (rfl | hl)
· exact h1
· exact w.ne_one l hl
chain_ne := w.chain_ne.cons' (fstIdx_ne_iff.mp hmw) }
@[simp]
theorem fstIdx_cons {i} (m : M i) (w : Word M) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i) (h1 : m ≠ 1) :
fstIdx (cons m w hmw h1) = some i := by simp [cons, fstIdx]
@[simp]
theorem prod_cons (i) (m : M i) (w : Word M) (h1 : m ≠ 1) (h2 : w.fstIdx ≠ some i) :
prod (cons m w h2 h1) = of m * prod w := by
simp [cons, prod, List.map_cons, List.prod_cons]
section
variable [∀ i, DecidableEq (M i)]
/-- Given a pair `(head, tail)`, we can form a word by prepending `head` to `tail`, except if `head`
is `1 : M i` then we have to just return `Word` since we need the result to be reduced. -/
def rcons {i} (p : Pair M i) : Word M :=
if h : p.head = 1 then p.tail
else cons p.head p.tail p.fstIdx_ne h
@[simp]
theorem prod_rcons {i} (p : Pair M i) : prod (rcons p) = of p.head * prod p.tail :=
if hm : p.head = 1 then by rw [rcons, dif_pos hm, hm, MonoidHom.map_one, one_mul]
else by rw [rcons, dif_neg hm, cons, prod, List.map_cons, List.prod_cons, prod]
theorem rcons_inj {i} : Function.Injective (rcons : Pair M i → Word M) := by
rintro ⟨m, w, h⟩ ⟨m', w', h'⟩ he
by_cases hm : m = 1 <;> by_cases hm' : m' = 1
· simp only [rcons, dif_pos hm, dif_pos hm'] at he
aesop
· exfalso
simp only [rcons, dif_pos hm, dif_neg hm'] at he
rw [he] at h
exact h rfl
· exfalso
simp only [rcons, dif_pos hm', dif_neg hm] at he
rw [← he] at h'
exact h' rfl
· have : m = m' ∧ w.toList = w'.toList := by
simpa [cons, rcons, dif_neg hm, dif_neg hm', eq_self_iff_true, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
heq_iff_eq, ← Subtype.ext_iff_val] using he
rcases this with ⟨rfl, h⟩
congr
exact Word.ext h
theorem mem_rcons_iff {i j : ι} (p : Pair M i) (m : M j) :
⟨_, m⟩ ∈ (rcons p).toList ↔ ⟨_, m⟩ ∈ p.tail.toList ∨
m ≠ 1 ∧ (∃ h : i = j, m = h ▸ p.head) := by
simp only [rcons, cons, ne_eq]
by_cases hij : i = j
· subst i
by_cases hm : m = p.head
· subst m
split_ifs <;> simp_all
· split_ifs <;> simp_all
· split_ifs <;> simp_all [Ne.symm hij]
end
/-- Induct on a word by adding letters one at a time without reduction,
effectively inducting on the underlying `List`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consRecOn {motive : Word M → Sort*} (w : Word M) (empty : motive empty)
(cons : ∀ (i) (m : M i) (w) h1 h2, motive w → motive (cons m w h1 h2)) :
motive w := by
rcases w with ⟨w, h1, h2⟩
induction w with
| nil => exact empty
| cons m w ih =>
refine cons m.1 m.2 ⟨w, fun _ hl => h1 _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hl), h2.tail⟩ ?_ ?_ (ih _ _)
· rw [List.chain'_cons'] at h2
simp only [fstIdx, ne_eq, Option.map_eq_some_iff,
Sigma.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, not_exists]
intro m' hm'
exact h2.1 _ hm' rfl
· exact h1 _ List.mem_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem consRecOn_empty {motive : Word M → Sort*} (h_empty : motive empty)
(h_cons : ∀ (i) (m : M i) (w) h1 h2, motive w → motive (cons m w h1 h2)) :
consRecOn empty h_empty h_cons = h_empty := rfl
@[simp]
theorem consRecOn_cons {motive : Word M → Sort*} (i) (m : M i) (w : Word M) h1 h2
| (h_empty : motive empty)
(h_cons : ∀ (i) (m : M i) (w) h1 h2, motive w → motive (cons m w h1 h2)) :
consRecOn (cons m w h1 h2) h_empty h_cons = h_cons i m w h1 h2
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/CoprodI.lean | 410 | 412 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff, Set.Subsingleton]
tauto
theorem one_lt_encard_iff_nontrivial : 1 < s.encard ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Set.not_nontrivial_iff, ← encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_inj (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
rw [Finset.card_range]
end SmallSets
theorem Finite.eq_insert_of_subset_of_encard_eq_succ (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t)
(hst : t.encard = s.encard + 1) : ∃ a, t = insert a s := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h, add_comm, WithTop.add_left_inj hs.encard_lt_top.ne,
encard_eq_one] at hst
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hst; use x; rw [← diff_union_of_subset h, hx, singleton_union]
theorem exists_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞} (hk : k ≤ s.encard) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.encard = k := by
revert hk
refine ENat.nat_induction k (fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, empty_subset _, by simp⟩) (fun n IH hle ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨t₀, ht₀s, ht₀⟩ := IH (le_trans (by simp) hle)
simp only [Nat.cast_succ] at *
have hne : t₀ ≠ s := by
rintro rfl; rw [ht₀, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le] at hle; simp at hle
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (ht₀s.ssubset_of_ne hne)
exact ⟨insert x t₀, insert_subset hx.1 ht₀s, by rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hx.2, ht₀]⟩
simp only [top_le_iff, encard_eq_top_iff]
exact fun _ hi ↦ ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hi⟩
theorem exists_superset_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) (hsk : s.encard ≤ k) (hkt : k ≤ t.encard) :
∃ r, s ⊆ r ∧ r ⊆ t ∧ r.encard = k := by
obtain (hs | hs) := eq_or_ne s.encard ⊤
· rw [hs, top_le_iff] at hsk; subst hsk; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hst, hs⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hsk
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := exists_add_of_le hkt
have hk : k ≤ encard (t \ s) := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst, add_comm] at hkt
exact WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right hs hkt
obtain ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩ := exists_subset_encard_eq hk
refine ⟨s ∪ r', subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hr'.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rw [encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hr' disjoint_sdiff_right)]
section Function
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.encard_image (h : InjOn f s) : (f '' s).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_image_of_injOn h, encard]
theorem encard_congr (e : s ≃ t) : s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← encard_univ_coe t, encard_univ, encard_univ, ENat.card_congr e]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.encard_image (hf : f.Injective) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s).encard = s.encard :=
hf.injOn.encard_image
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.encard_le (e : s ↪ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← e.injective.encard_image, ← Subtype.coe_injective.encard_image]
exact encard_mono (by simp)
theorem encard_image_le (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : (f '' s).encard ≤ s.encard := by
obtain (h | h) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image]
apply encard_le_encard
exact f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s
theorem Finite.injOn_of_encard_image_eq (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).encard = s.encard) :
InjOn f s := by
obtain (h' | hne) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image] at h
rw [injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self]
exact hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s) h.symm.le
theorem encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range (hf : f.Injective) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard := by
rw [← hf.encard_image, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left ht]
lemma encard_preimage_of_bijective (hf : f.Bijective) (t : Set β) : (f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard :=
encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range hf.injective (by simp [hf.surjective.range_eq])
theorem encard_le_encard_of_injOn (hf : MapsTo f s t) (f_inj : InjOn f s) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← f_inj.encard_image]; apply encard_le_encard; rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact hf hx
theorem Finite.exists_injOn_of_encard_le [Nonempty β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(hle : s.encard ≤ t.encard) : ∃ (f : α → β), s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ∧ InjOn f s := by
classical
obtain (rfl | h | ⟨a, has, -⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· simp
· exact (encard_ne_top_iff.mpr hs h).elim
obtain ⟨b, hbt⟩ := encard_pos.1 ((encard_pos.2 ⟨_, has⟩).trans_le hle)
have hle' : (s \ {a}).encard ≤ (t \ {b}).encard := by
rwa [← WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right WithTop.one_ne_top,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one has, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hbt]
obtain ⟨f₀, hf₀s, hinj⟩ := exists_injOn_of_encard_le hs.diff hle'
simp only [preimage_diff, subset_def, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, and_imp] at hf₀s
use Function.update f₀ a b
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_diff_singleton, injOn_insert (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl)]
simp only [mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, not_true, and_false, insert_diff_singleton, subset_def,
mem_insert_iff, mem_preimage, ne_eq, Function.update_apply, forall_eq_or_imp, ite_true, and_imp,
mem_image, ite_eq_left_iff, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, and_iff_right hbt]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun x hxs hxa ↦ ⟨hxa, (hf₀s x hxs hxa).2⟩⟩
· rintro x hx; split_ifs with h
· assumption
· exact (hf₀s x hx h).1
exact InjOn.congr hinj (fun x ⟨_, hxa⟩ ↦ by rwa [Function.update_of_ne])
termination_by encard s
theorem Finite.exists_bijOn_of_encard_eq [Nonempty β] (hs : s.Finite) (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
∃ (f : α → β), BijOn f s t := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hinj⟩ := hs.exists_injOn_of_encard_le h.le; use f
convert hinj.bijOn_image
rw [(hs.image f).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (image_subset_iff.mpr hf)
(h.symm.trans hinj.encard_image.symm).le]
end Function
section ncard
open Nat
/-- A tactic (for use in default params) that applies `Set.toFinite` to synthesize a `Set.Finite`
term. -/
syntax "toFinite_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| toFinite_tac) => `(tactic| apply Set.toFinite)
/-- A tactic useful for transferring proofs for `encard` to their corresponding `card` statements -/
syntax "to_encard_tac" : tactic
|
macro_rules
| `(tactic| to_encard_tac) => `(tactic|
simp only [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one])
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 491 | 494 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.BigOperators
/-!
# Miscellaneous definitions, lemmas, and constructions using finsupp
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp.graph`: the finset of input and output pairs with non-zero outputs.
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`: `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv.
* `Finsupp.mapDomain`: maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by a function and by summing.
* `Finsupp.comapDomain`: postcomposition of a `Finsupp` with a function injective on the preimage
of its support.
* `Finsupp.some`: restrict a finitely supported function on `Option α` to a finitely supported
function on `α`.
* `Finsupp.filter`: `filter p f` is the finitely supported function that is `f a` if `p a` is true
and 0 otherwise.
* `Finsupp.frange`: the image of a finitely supported function on its support.
* `Finsupp.subtype_domain`: the restriction of a finitely supported function `f` to a subtype.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* This file is currently ~1600 lines long and is quite a miscellany of definitions and lemmas,
so it should be divided into smaller pieces.
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `graph` -/
section Graph
variable [Zero M]
/-- The graph of a finitely supported function over its support, i.e. the finset of input and output
pairs with non-zero outputs. -/
def graph (f : α →₀ M) : Finset (α × M) :=
f.support.map ⟨fun a => Prod.mk a (f a), fun _ _ h => (Prod.mk.inj h).1⟩
theorem mk_mem_graph_iff {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} : (a, m) ∈ f.graph ↔ f a = m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [graph, mem_map, mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨b, ha, rfl, -⟩
exact ⟨rfl, ha⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_graph_iff {c : α × M} {f : α →₀ M} : c ∈ f.graph ↔ f c.1 = c.2 ∧ c.2 ≠ 0 := by
cases c
exact mk_mem_graph_iff
theorem mk_mem_graph (f : α →₀ M) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ f.support) : (a, f a) ∈ f.graph :=
mk_mem_graph_iff.2 ⟨rfl, mem_support_iff.1 ha⟩
theorem apply_eq_of_mem_graph {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} (h : (a, m) ∈ f.graph) : f a = m :=
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).1
@[simp 1100] -- Higher priority shortcut instance for `mem_graph_iff`.
theorem not_mem_graph_snd_zero (a : α) (f : α →₀ M) : (a, (0 : M)) ∉ f.graph := fun h =>
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).2.irrefl
@[simp]
theorem image_fst_graph [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ M) : f.graph.image Prod.fst = f.support := by
classical
simp only [graph, map_eq_image, image_image, Embedding.coeFn_mk, Function.comp_def, image_id']
theorem graph_injective (α M) [Zero M] : Injective (@graph α M _) := by
intro f g h
classical
have hsup : f.support = g.support := by rw [← image_fst_graph, h, image_fst_graph]
refine ext_iff'.2 ⟨hsup, fun x hx => apply_eq_of_mem_graph <| h.symm ▸ ?_⟩
exact mk_mem_graph _ (hsup ▸ hx)
@[simp]
theorem graph_inj {f g : α →₀ M} : f.graph = g.graph ↔ f = g :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem graph_zero : graph (0 : α →₀ M) = ∅ := by simp [graph]
@[simp]
theorem graph_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.graph = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff' graph_zero
end Graph
end Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
namespace Finsupp
section Equiv
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf' : f.symm 0 = 0) : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f hf : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm hf' : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_refl : mapRange.equiv (Equiv.refl M) rfl rfl = Equiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
Equiv.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.equiv_trans (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf') (f₂ : N ≃ P) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (hf₂') :
(mapRange.equiv (f.trans f₂) (by rw [Equiv.trans_apply, hf, hf₂])
(by rw [Equiv.symm_trans_apply, hf₂', hf']) :
(α →₀ _) ≃ _) =
(mapRange.equiv f hf hf').trans (mapRange.equiv f₂ hf₂ hf₂') :=
Equiv.ext <| mapRange_comp f₂ hf₂ f hf ((congrArg f₂ hf).trans hf₂)
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_symm (f : M ≃ N) (hf hf') :
((mapRange.equiv f hf hf').symm : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) = mapRange.equiv f.symm hf' hf :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
end Equiv
section ZeroHom
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Composition with a fixed zero-preserving homomorphism is itself a zero-preserving homomorphism
on functions. -/
@[simps]
def mapRange.zeroHom (f : ZeroHom M N) : ZeroHom (α →₀ M) (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_id : mapRange.zeroHom (ZeroHom.id M) = ZeroHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
ZeroHom.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_comp (f : ZeroHom N P) (f₂ : ZeroHom M N) :
(mapRange.zeroHom (f.comp f₂) : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) =
(mapRange.zeroHom f).comp (mapRange.zeroHom f₂) :=
ZeroHom.ext <| mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
end ZeroHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [AddMonoidHomClass F M N]
/-- Composition with a fixed additive homomorphism is itself an additive homomorphism on functions.
-/
@[simps]
def mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ M) →+ α →₀ N where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
-- Porting note: need either `dsimp only` or to specify `hf`:
-- see also: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129
map_add' := mapRange_add (hf := f.map_zero) f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_id :
mapRange.addMonoidHom (AddMonoidHom.id M) = AddMonoidHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_comp (f : N →+ P) (f₂ : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f.comp f₂) : (α →₀ _) →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapRange.addMonoidHom f₂) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext <|
mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_toZeroHom (f : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).toZeroHom = (mapRange.zeroHom f.toZeroHom : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) :=
ZeroHom.ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_multiset_sum (f : F) (m : Multiset (α →₀ M)) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) m.sum = (m.map fun x => mapRange f (map_zero f) x).sum :=
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ _) →+ _).map_multiset_sum _
theorem mapRange_finset_sum (f : F) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (∑ x ∈ s, g x) = ∑ x ∈ s, mapRange f (map_zero f) (g x) :=
map_sum (mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N)) _ _
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange.AddMonoidHom` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.addEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ N) :=
{ mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl }
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_refl : mapRange.addEquiv (AddEquiv.refl M) = AddEquiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
AddEquiv.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_trans (f : M ≃+ N) (f₂ : N ≃+ P) :
(mapRange.addEquiv (f.trans f₂) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ P)) =
(mapRange.addEquiv f).trans (mapRange.addEquiv f₂) :=
AddEquiv.ext (mapRange_comp _ f₂.map_zero _ f.map_zero (by simp))
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_symm (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f).symm : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) = mapRange.addEquiv f.symm :=
AddEquiv.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toAddMonoidHom (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) : _ →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom : (α →₀ _) →+ _) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) :
↑(mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) =
(mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) f.map_zero f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
end AddMonoidHom
end Finsupp
end MapRange
| /-! ### Declarations about `equivCongrLeft` -/
section EquivCongrLeft
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean | 263 | 266 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Preorder
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Const
import Mathlib.Order.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.SuppressCompilation
/-!
# Composable arrows
If `C` is a category, the type of `n`-simplices in the nerve of `C` identifies
to the type of functors `Fin (n + 1) ⥤ C`, which can be thought as families of `n` composable
arrows in `C`. In this file, we introduce and study this category `ComposableArrows C n`
of `n` composable arrows in `C`.
If `F : ComposableArrows C n`, we define `F.left` as the leftmost object, `F.right` as the
rightmost object, and `F.hom : F.left ⟶ F.right` is the canonical map.
The most significant definition in this file is the constructor
`F.precomp f : ComposableArrows C (n + 1)` for `F : ComposableArrows C n` and `f : X ⟶ F.left`:
"it shifts `F` towards the right and inserts `f` on the left". This `precomp` has
good definitional properties.
In the namespace `CategoryTheory.ComposableArrows`, we provide constructors
like `mk₁ f`, `mk₂ f g`, `mk₃ f g h` for `ComposableArrows C n` for small `n`.
TODO (@joelriou):
* redefine `Arrow C` as `ComposableArrow C 1`?
* construct some elements in `ComposableArrows m (Fin (n + 1))` for small `n`
the precomposition with which shall induce functors
`ComposableArrows C n ⥤ ComposableArrows C m` which correspond to simplicial operations
(specifically faces) with good definitional properties (this might be necessary for
up to `n = 7` in order to formalize spectral sequences following Verdier)
-/
/-!
New `simprocs` that run even in `dsimp` have caused breakages in this file.
(e.g. `dsimp` can now simplify `2 + 3` to `5`)
For now, we just turn off simprocs in this file.
We'll soon provide finer grained options here, e.g. to turn off simprocs only in `dsimp`, etc.
*However*, hopefully it is possible to refactor the material here so that no backwards compatibility
`set_option`s are required at all
-/
set_option simprocs false
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
/-- `ComposableArrows C n` is the type of functors `Fin (n + 1) ⥤ C`. -/
abbrev ComposableArrows (n : ℕ) := Fin (n + 1) ⥤ C
namespace ComposableArrows
variable {C} {n m : ℕ}
variable (F G : ComposableArrows C n)
/-- A wrapper for `omega` which prefaces it with some quick and useful attempts -/
macro "valid" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first | assumption | apply zero_le | apply le_rfl | transitivity <;> assumption | omega)
/-- The `i`th object (with `i : ℕ` such that `i ≤ n`) of `F : ComposableArrows C n`. -/
@[simp]
abbrev obj' (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ n := by valid) : C := F.obj ⟨i, by omega⟩
/-- The map `F.obj' i ⟶ F.obj' j` when `F : ComposableArrows C n`, and `i` and `j`
are natural numbers such that `i ≤ j ≤ n`. -/
@[simp]
abbrev map' (i j : ℕ) (hij : i ≤ j := by valid) (hjn : j ≤ n := by valid) :
F.obj ⟨i, by omega⟩ ⟶ F.obj ⟨j, by omega⟩ := F.map (homOfLE (by
simp only [Fin.mk_le_mk]
valid))
lemma map'_self (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ n := by valid) :
F.map' i i = 𝟙 _ := F.map_id _
lemma map'_comp (i j k : ℕ) (hij : i ≤ j := by valid)
(hjk : j ≤ k := by valid) (hk : k ≤ n := by valid) :
F.map' i k = F.map' i j ≫ F.map' j k :=
F.map_comp _ _
/-- The leftmost object of `F : ComposableArrows C n`. -/
abbrev left := obj' F 0
/-- The rightmost object of `F : ComposableArrows C n`. -/
abbrev right := obj' F n
/-- The canonical map `F.left ⟶ F.right` for `F : ComposableArrows C n`. -/
abbrev hom : F.left ⟶ F.right := map' F 0 n
variable {F G}
/-- The map `F.obj' i ⟶ G.obj' i` induced on `i`th objects by a morphism `F ⟶ G`
in `ComposableArrows C n` when `i` is a natural number such that `i ≤ n`. -/
@[simp]
abbrev app' (φ : F ⟶ G) (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ n := by valid) :
F.obj' i ⟶ G.obj' i := φ.app _
@[reassoc]
lemma naturality' (φ : F ⟶ G) (i j : ℕ) (hij : i ≤ j := by valid)
(hj : j ≤ n := by valid) :
F.map' i j ≫ app' φ j = app' φ i ≫ G.map' i j :=
φ.naturality _
/-- Constructor for `ComposableArrows C 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def mk₀ (X : C) : ComposableArrows C 0 := (Functor.const (Fin 1)).obj X
namespace Mk₁
variable (X₀ X₁ : C)
/-- The map which sends `0 : Fin 2` to `X₀` and `1` to `X₁`. -/
@[simp]
def obj : Fin 2 → C
| ⟨0, _⟩ => X₀
| ⟨1, _⟩ => X₁
variable {X₀ X₁}
variable (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁)
/-- The obvious map `obj X₀ X₁ i ⟶ obj X₀ X₁ j` whenever `i j : Fin 2` satisfy `i ≤ j`. -/
@[simp]
def map : ∀ (i j : Fin 2) (_ : i ≤ j), obj X₀ X₁ i ⟶ obj X₀ X₁ j
| ⟨0, _⟩, ⟨0, _⟩, _ => 𝟙 _
| ⟨0, _⟩, ⟨1, _⟩, _ => f
| ⟨1, _⟩, ⟨1, _⟩, _ => 𝟙 _
lemma map_id (i : Fin 2) : map f i i (by simp) = 𝟙 _ :=
match i with
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
lemma map_comp {i j k : Fin 2} (hij : i ≤ j) (hjk : j ≤ k) :
map f i k (hij.trans hjk) = map f i j hij ≫ map f j k hjk := by
obtain rfl | rfl : i = j ∨ j = k := by omega
· rw [map_id, id_comp]
· rw [map_id, comp_id]
end Mk₁
/-- Constructor for `ComposableArrows C 1`. -/
@[simps]
def mk₁ {X₀ X₁ : C} (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁) : ComposableArrows C 1 where
obj := Mk₁.obj X₀ X₁
map g := Mk₁.map f _ _ (leOfHom g)
map_id := Mk₁.map_id f
map_comp g g' := Mk₁.map_comp f (leOfHom g) (leOfHom g')
/-- Constructor for morphisms `F ⟶ G` in `ComposableArrows C n` which takes as inputs
a family of morphisms `F.obj i ⟶ G.obj i` and the naturality condition only for the
maps in `Fin (n + 1)` given by inequalities of the form `i ≤ i + 1`. -/
@[simps]
def homMk {F G : ComposableArrows C n} (app : ∀ i, F.obj i ⟶ G.obj i)
(w : ∀ (i : ℕ) (hi : i < n), F.map' i (i + 1) ≫ app _ = app _ ≫ G.map' i (i + 1)) :
F ⟶ G where
app := app
naturality := by
suffices ∀ (k i j : ℕ) (hj : i + k = j) (hj' : j ≤ n),
F.map' i j ≫ app _ = app _ ≫ G.map' i j by
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ hij
have hij' := leOfHom hij
simp only [Fin.mk_le_mk] at hij'
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.le.dest hij'
exact this k i j hk (by valid)
intro k
induction' k with k hk
· intro i j hj hj'
simp only [add_zero] at hj
obtain rfl := hj
rw [F.map'_self i, G.map'_self i, id_comp, comp_id]
· intro i j hj hj'
rw [← add_assoc] at hj
subst hj
rw [F.map'_comp i (i + k) (i + k + 1), G.map'_comp i (i + k) (i + k + 1), assoc,
w (i + k) (by valid), reassoc_of% (hk i (i + k) rfl (by valid))]
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms `F ≅ G` in `ComposableArrows C n` which takes as inputs
a family of isomorphisms `F.obj i ≅ G.obj i` and the naturality condition only for the
maps in `Fin (n + 1)` given by inequalities of the form `i ≤ i + 1`. -/
@[simps]
def isoMk {F G : ComposableArrows C n} (app : ∀ i, F.obj i ≅ G.obj i)
(w : ∀ (i : ℕ) (hi : i < n),
F.map' i (i + 1) ≫ (app _).hom = (app _).hom ≫ G.map' i (i + 1)) :
F ≅ G where
hom := homMk (fun i => (app i).hom) w
inv := homMk (fun i => (app i).inv) (fun i hi => by
dsimp only
rw [← cancel_epi ((app _).hom), ← reassoc_of% (w i hi), Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id,
Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc])
lemma ext {F G : ComposableArrows C n} (h : ∀ i, F.obj i = G.obj i)
(w : ∀ (i : ℕ) (hi : i < n), F.map' i (i + 1) =
eqToHom (h _) ≫ G.map' i (i + 1) ≫ eqToHom (h _).symm) : F = G :=
Functor.ext_of_iso
(isoMk (fun i => eqToIso (h i)) (fun i hi => by simp [w i hi])) h (fun _ => rfl)
/-- Constructor for morphisms in `ComposableArrows C 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def homMk₀ {F G : ComposableArrows C 0} (f : F.obj' 0 ⟶ G.obj' 0) : F ⟶ G :=
homMk (fun i => match i with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => f) (fun i hi => by simp at hi)
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext₀ {F G : ComposableArrows C 0} {φ φ' : F ⟶ G}
(h : app' φ 0 = app' φ' 0) :
φ = φ' := by
ext i
fin_cases i
exact h
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms in `ComposableArrows C 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def isoMk₀ {F G : ComposableArrows C 0} (e : F.obj' 0 ≅ G.obj' 0) : F ≅ G where
hom := homMk₀ e.hom
inv := homMk₀ e.inv
lemma ext₀ {F G : ComposableArrows C 0} (h : F.obj' 0 = G.obj 0) : F = G :=
ext (fun i => match i with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => h) (fun i hi => by simp at hi)
lemma mk₀_surjective (F : ComposableArrows C 0) : ∃ (X : C), F = mk₀ X :=
⟨F.obj' 0, ext₀ rfl⟩
/-- Constructor for morphisms in `ComposableArrows C 1`. -/
@[simps!]
def homMk₁ {F G : ComposableArrows C 1}
(left : F.obj' 0 ⟶ G.obj' 0) (right : F.obj' 1 ⟶ G.obj' 1)
(w : F.map' 0 1 ≫ right = left ≫ G.map' 0 1 := by aesop_cat) :
F ⟶ G :=
homMk (fun i => match i with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => left
| ⟨1, _⟩ => right) (by
intro i hi
obtain rfl : i = 0 := by simpa using hi
exact w)
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext₁ {F G : ComposableArrows C 1} {φ φ' : F ⟶ G}
(h₀ : app' φ 0 = app' φ' 0) (h₁ : app' φ 1 = app' φ' 1) :
φ = φ' := by
ext i
match i with
| 0 => exact h₀
| 1 => exact h₁
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms in `ComposableArrows C 1`. -/
@[simps!]
def isoMk₁ {F G : ComposableArrows C 1}
(left : F.obj' 0 ≅ G.obj' 0) (right : F.obj' 1 ≅ G.obj' 1)
(w : F.map' 0 1 ≫ right.hom = left.hom ≫ G.map' 0 1 := by aesop_cat) :
F ≅ G where
hom := homMk₁ left.hom right.hom w
inv := homMk₁ left.inv right.inv (by
rw [← cancel_mono right.hom, assoc, assoc, w, right.inv_hom_id, left.inv_hom_id_assoc]
apply comp_id)
lemma map'_eq_hom₁ (F : ComposableArrows C 1) : F.map' 0 1 = F.hom := rfl
lemma ext₁ {F G : ComposableArrows C 1}
(left : F.left = G.left) (right : F.right = G.right)
(w : F.hom = eqToHom left ≫ G.hom ≫ eqToHom right.symm) : F = G :=
Functor.ext_of_iso (isoMk₁ (eqToIso left) (eqToIso right) (by simp [map'_eq_hom₁, w]))
(fun i => by fin_cases i <;> assumption)
(fun i => by fin_cases i <;> rfl)
lemma mk₁_surjective (X : ComposableArrows C 1) : ∃ (X₀ X₁ : C) (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁), X = mk₁ f :=
⟨_, _, X.map' 0 1, ext₁ rfl rfl (by simp)⟩
variable (F)
namespace Precomp
variable (X : C)
/-- The map `Fin (n + 1 + 1) → C` which "shifts" `F.obj'` to the right and inserts `X` in
the zeroth position. -/
def obj : Fin (n + 1 + 1) → C
| ⟨0, _⟩ => X
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ => F.obj' i
@[simp]
lemma obj_zero : obj F X 0 = X := rfl
@[simp]
lemma obj_one : obj F X 1 = F.obj' 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma obj_succ (i : ℕ) (hi : i + 1 < n + 1 + 1) : obj F X ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ = F.obj' i := rfl
variable {X} (f : X ⟶ F.left)
/-- Auxiliary definition for the action on maps of the functor `F.precomp f`.
It sends `0 ≤ 1` to `f` and `i + 1 ≤ j + 1` to `F.map' i j`. -/
def map : ∀ (i j : Fin (n + 1 + 1)) (_ : i ≤ j), obj F X i ⟶ obj F X j
| ⟨0, _⟩, ⟨0, _⟩, _ => 𝟙 X
| ⟨0, _⟩, ⟨1, _⟩, _ => f
| ⟨0, _⟩, ⟨j + 2, hj⟩, _ => f ≫ F.map' 0 (j + 1)
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩, ⟨j + 1, hj⟩, hij => F.map' i j (by simpa using hij)
@[simp]
lemma map_zero_zero : map F f 0 0 (by simp) = 𝟙 X := rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_one_one : map F f 1 1 (by simp) = F.map (𝟙 _) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_zero_one : map F f 0 1 (by simp) = f := rfl
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/ComposableArrows.lean | 321 | 322 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Lattice
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Submodule
lemma coe_span_smul {R' M' : Type*} [CommSemiring R'] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M']
(s : Set R') (N : Submodule R' M') :
(Ideal.span s : Set R') • N = s • N :=
set_smul_eq_of_le _ _ _
(by rintro r n hr hn
induction hr using Submodule.span_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem h hn
| zero => rw [zero_smul]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add _ _ _ _ ihr ihs => rw [add_smul]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ ihr ihs
| smul _ _ hr =>
rw [mem_span_set] at hr
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [Finsupp.sum, Finset.smul_sum, Finset.sum_smul]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => ?_
rw [← mul_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_smul]
exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem (hc hi) <| Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hn) <|
set_smul_mono_left _ Submodule.subset_span
lemma span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(span ℤ {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a := by
ext i
simp [Ideal.mem_span_singleton', AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff]
@[simp] lemma _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(Ideal.span {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a :=
Submodule.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples _
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} {M' F G : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- This duplicates the global `smul_eq_mul`, but doesn't have to unfold anywhere near as much to
apply. -/
protected theorem _root_.Ideal.smul_eq_mul (I J : Ideal R) : I • J = I * J :=
rfl
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N : Submodule R M}
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 fun r _ _ ↦ N.smul_mem r
theorem map_le_smul_top (I : Ideal R) (f : R →ₗ[R] M) :
Submodule.map f I ≤ I • (⊤ : Submodule R M) := by
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [← mul_one y, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smul]
exact smul_mem_smul hy mem_top
variable (I J N)
@[simp]
theorem top_smul : (⊤ : Ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right fun r hri => one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
protected theorem mul_smul : (I * J) • N = I • J • N :=
Submodule.smul_assoc _ _ _
theorem mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤) (x : M)
(H : ∀ r : s, (r : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
suffices LinearMap.range (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x) ≤ M' by
rw [← LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_one R M x]
exact this (LinearMap.mem_range_self _ 1)
rw [LinearMap.range_eq_map, ← hs, map_le_iff_le_comap, Ideal.span, span_le]
exact fun r hr ↦ H ⟨r, hr⟩
variable {M' : Type w} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
@[simp]
theorem map_smul'' (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (I • N).map f = I • N.map f :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr n hn =>
show f (r • n) ∈ I • N.map f from
(f.map_smul r n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (mem_map_of_mem hn)) <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr _ hn =>
let ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩ := mem_map.1 hn
hfp ▸ f.map_smul r p ▸ mem_map_of_mem (smul_mem_smul hr hp)
theorem mem_smul_top_iff (N : Submodule R M) (x : N) :
x ∈ I • (⊤ : Submodule R N) ↔ (x : M) ∈ I • N := by
have : Submodule.map N.subtype (I • ⊤) = I • N := by
rw [Submodule.map_smul'', Submodule.map_top, Submodule.range_subtype]
simp [← this, -map_smul'']
@[simp]
theorem smul_comap_le_comap_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (S : Submodule R M') (I : Ideal R) :
I • S.comap f ≤ (I • S).comap f := by
refine Submodule.smul_le.mpr fun r hr x hx => ?_
rw [Submodule.mem_comap] at hx ⊢
rw [f.map_smul]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hx
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
open Pointwise
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : Ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : Set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨fun hx =>
smul_induction_on hx
(fun r hri _ hnm =>
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm
⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right _ hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
fun m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩ =>
⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩,
fun ⟨_, hyi, hy⟩ => hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span <| Set.mem_singleton m)⟩
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N P : Submodule R M}
variable (S : Set R) (T : Set M)
theorem smul_eq_map₂ : I • N = Submodule.map₂ (LinearMap.lsmul R M) I N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ Submodule.apply_mem_map₂ _ hm)
(map₂_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ smul_mem_smul hm)
theorem span_smul_span : Ideal.span S • span R T = span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) := by
rw [smul_eq_map₂]
exact (map₂_span_span _ _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg _ <| Set.image2_eq_iUnion _ _ _
theorem ideal_span_singleton_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) :
(Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R) • N = r • N := by
have : span R (⋃ (t : M) (_ : t ∈ N), {r • t}) = r • N := by
convert span_eq (r • N)
exact (Set.image_eq_iUnion _ (N : Set M)).symm
conv_lhs => rw [← span_eq N, span_smul_span]
simpa
/-- Given `s`, a generating set of `R`, to check that an `x : M` falls in a
submodule `M'` of `x`, we only need to show that `r ^ n • x ∈ M'` for some `n` for each `r : s`. -/
theorem mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤)
(x : M) (H : ∀ r : s, ∃ n : ℕ, ((r : R) ^ n : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
choose f hf using H
apply M'.mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem _ (Ideal.span_range_pow_eq_top s hs f)
rintro ⟨_, r, hr, rfl⟩
exact hf r
open Pointwise in
@[simp]
theorem map_pointwise_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :
(r • N).map f = r • N.map f := by
simp_rw [← ideal_span_singleton_smul, map_smul'']
theorem mem_smul_span {s : Set M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • Submodule.span R s ↔ x ∈ Submodule.span R (⋃ (a ∈ I) (b ∈ s), ({a • b} : Set M)) := by
rw [← I.span_eq, Submodule.span_smul_span, I.span_eq]
simp
variable (I)
/-- If `x` is an `I`-multiple of the submodule spanned by `f '' s`,
then we can write `x` as an `I`-linear combination of the elements of `f '' s`. -/
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (Set.range f) ↔
∃ (a : ι →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
constructor; swap
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact Submodule.sum_mem _ fun c _ => smul_mem_smul (ha c) <| subset_span <| Set.mem_range_self _
refine fun hx => span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ (mem_smul_span.mp hx)
· simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
rintro x ⟨y, hy, x, ⟨i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Finsupp.single i y, fun j => ?_, ?_⟩
· letI := Classical.decEq ι
rw [Finsupp.single_apply]
split_ifs
· assumption
· exact I.zero_mem
refine @Finsupp.sum_single_index ι R M _ _ i _ (fun i y => y • f i) ?_
simp
· exact ⟨0, fun _ => I.zero_mem, Finsupp.sum_zero_index⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨ax, hax, rfl⟩ ⟨ay, hay, rfl⟩
refine ⟨ax + ay, fun i => I.add_mem (hax i) (hay i), Finsupp.sum_add_index' ?_ ?_⟩ <;>
intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, add_smul]
· rintro c x - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
refine ⟨c • a, fun i => I.mul_mem_left c (ha i), ?_⟩
rw [Finsupp.sum_smul_index, Finsupp.smul_sum] <;> intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, mul_smul]
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (f '' s) ↔
∃ (a : s →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
rw [← Submodule.mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum, ← Set.image_eq_range]
end CommSemiring
end Submodule
namespace Ideal
section Add
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup {I J : Ideal R} : I + J = I ⊔ J :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_bot : (0 : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum_eq_sup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Ideal R) : s.sum f = s.sup f :=
rfl
end Add
section Semiring
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {I J K L : Ideal R}
@[simp]
theorem one_eq_top : (1 : Ideal R) = ⊤ := by
rw [Submodule.one_eq_span, ← Ideal.span, Ideal.span_singleton_one]
theorem add_eq_one_iff : I + J = 1 ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [one_eq_top, eq_top_iff_one, add_eq_sup, Submodule.mem_sup]
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem pow_mem_pow {x : R} (hx : x ∈ I) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ I ^ n :=
Submodule.pow_mem_pow _ hx _
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ s ∈ J, r * s ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_le
theorem mul_le_left : I * J ≤ J :=
mul_le.2 fun _ _ _ => J.mul_mem_left _
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_left_self : I ⊔ J * I = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_self_sup : J * I ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_left
theorem mul_le_right [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ≤ I :=
mul_le.2 fun _ hr _ _ ↦ I.mul_mem_right _ hr
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_right_self [I.IsTwoSided] : I ⊔ I * J = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_self_sup [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_right
protected theorem mul_assoc : I * J * K = I * (J * K) :=
Submodule.smul_assoc I J K
variable (I)
theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
Submodule.top_smul I
variable {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
Submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
Submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
smul_mono_right I h
variable (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
Submodule.smul_sup I J K
theorem sup_mul : (I ⊔ J) * K = I * K ⊔ J * K :=
Submodule.sup_smul I J K
variable {I J K}
theorem pow_le_pow_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : I ^ n ≤ I ^ m := by
obtain _ | m := m
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; exact le_top
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, Submodule.pow_add _ m.add_one_ne_zero]
exact mul_le_left
theorem pow_le_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : I ^ n ≤ I :=
calc
I ^ n ≤ I ^ 1 := pow_le_pow_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
_ = I := Submodule.pow_one _
theorem pow_right_mono (e : I ≤ J) (n : ℕ) : I ^ n ≤ J ^ n := by
induction' n with _ hn
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, Submodule.pow_zero]
· rw [Submodule.pow_succ, Submodule.pow_succ]
exact Ideal.mul_mono hn e
namespace IsTwoSided
instance (priority := low) [J.IsTwoSided] : (I * J).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ Submodule.mul_induction_on ha
(fun i hi j hj ↦ by rw [mul_assoc]; exact mul_mem_mul hi (mul_mem_right _ _ hj))
fun x y hx hy ↦ by rw [right_distrib]; exact add_mem hx hy⟩
variable [I.IsTwoSided] (m n : ℕ)
instance (priority := low) : (I ^ n).IsTwoSided :=
n.rec
(by rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; infer_instance)
(fun _ _ ↦ by rw [Submodule.pow_succ]; infer_instance)
protected theorem mul_one : I * 1 = I :=
mul_le_right.antisymm
fun i hi ↦ mul_one i ▸ mul_mem_mul hi (one_eq_top (R := R) ▸ Submodule.mem_top)
protected theorem pow_add : I ^ (m + n) = I ^ m * I ^ n := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne n 0
· rw [add_zero, Submodule.pow_zero, IsTwoSided.mul_one]
· exact Submodule.pow_add _ h
protected theorem pow_succ : I ^ (n + 1) = I * I ^ n := by
rw [add_comm, IsTwoSided.pow_add, Submodule.pow_one]
end IsTwoSided
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_bot [NoZeroDivisors R] : I * J = ⊥ ↔ I = ⊥ ∨ J = ⊥ :=
⟨fun hij =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun I_ne_bot =>
J.eq_bot_iff.mpr fun j hj =>
let ⟨i, hi, ne0⟩ := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I_ne_bot
Or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.mp ((I * J).eq_bot_iff.mp hij _ (mul_mem_mul hi hj))) ne0,
fun h => by obtain rfl | rfl := h; exacts [bot_mul _, mul_bot _]⟩
instance [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors (Ideal R) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := mul_eq_bot.1
instance {S A : Type*} [Semiring S] [SMul R S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A]
[IsScalarTower R S A] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] {I : Submodule S A} : NoZeroSMulDivisors R I :=
Submodule.noZeroSMulDivisors (Submodule.restrictScalars R I)
theorem pow_eq_zero_of_mem {I : Ideal R} {n m : ℕ} (hnI : I ^ n = 0) (hmn : n ≤ m) {x : R}
(hx : x ∈ I) : x ^ m = 0 := by
simpa [hnI] using pow_le_pow_right hmn <| pow_mem_pow hx m
end Semiring
section MulAndRadical
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {I J K L : Ideal R}
theorem mul_mem_mul_rev {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : s * r ∈ I * J :=
mul_comm r s ▸ mul_mem_mul hr hs
theorem prod_mem_prod {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {I : ι → Ideal R} {x : ι → R} :
(∀ i ∈ s, x i ∈ I i) → (∏ i ∈ s, x i) ∈ ∏ i ∈ s, I i := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro
rw [Finset.prod_empty, Finset.prod_empty, one_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
· intro a s ha IH h
rw [Finset.prod_insert ha, Finset.prod_insert ha]
exact
mul_mem_mul (h a <| Finset.mem_insert_self a s)
(IH fun i hi => h i <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
lemma sup_pow_add_le_pow_sup_pow {n m : ℕ} : (I ⊔ J) ^ (n + m) ≤ I ^ n ⊔ J ^ m := by
rw [← Ideal.add_eq_sup, ← Ideal.add_eq_sup, add_pow, Ideal.sum_eq_sup]
apply Finset.sup_le
intros i hi
by_cases hn : n ≤ i
· exact (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hn).trans le_sup_left)))
· refine (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_left.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right ?_).trans le_sup_right)))
omega
variable (I J K)
protected theorem mul_comm : I * J = J * I :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.2 fun _ hrI _ hsJ => mul_mem_mul_rev hsJ hrI)
(mul_le.2 fun _ hrJ _ hsI => mul_mem_mul_rev hsI hrJ)
theorem span_mul_span (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s * t}) :=
Submodule.span_smul_span S T
variable {I J K}
theorem span_mul_span' (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (S * T) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span]
theorem span_singleton_mul_span_singleton (r s : R) :
span {r} * span {s} = (span {r * s} : Ideal R) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span, Set.singleton_mul_singleton]
theorem span_singleton_pow (s : R) (n : ℕ) : span {s} ^ n = (span {s ^ n} : Ideal R) := by
induction' n with n ih; · simp [Set.singleton_one]
simp only [pow_succ, ih, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
theorem mem_mul_span_singleton {x y : R} {I : Ideal R} : x ∈ I * span {y} ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, z * y = x :=
Submodule.mem_smul_span_singleton
theorem mem_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I : Ideal R} : x ∈ span {y} * I ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, y * z = x := by
simp only [mul_comm, mem_mul_span_singleton]
theorem le_span_singleton_mul_iff {x : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI :=
show (∀ {zI} (_ : zI ∈ I), zI ∈ span {x} * J) ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI by
simp only [mem_span_singleton_mul]
theorem span_singleton_mul_le_iff {x : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ J ↔ ∀ z ∈ I, x * z ∈ J := by
simp only [mul_le, mem_span_singleton_mul, mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· intro h zI hzI
exact h x (dvd_refl x) zI hzI
· rintro h _ ⟨z, rfl⟩ zI hzI
rw [mul_comm x z, mul_assoc]
exact J.mul_mem_left _ (h zI hzI)
theorem span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ span {y} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ := by
simp only [span_singleton_mul_le_iff, mem_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_mono [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
span {x} * I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ I ≤ J := by
simp_rw [span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, mul_right_inj' hx,
exists_eq_right', SetLike.le_def]
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_mono [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
I * span {x} ≤ J * span {x} ↔ I ≤ J := by
simpa only [mul_comm I, mul_comm J] using span_singleton_mul_right_mono hx
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_inj [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
span {x} * I = span {x} * J ↔ I = J := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_right_mono hx]
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_inj [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
I * span {x} = J * span {x} ↔ I = J := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_left_mono hx]
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_injective [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective ((span {x} : Ideal R) * ·) := fun _ _ =>
(span_singleton_mul_right_inj hx).mp
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_injective [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun I : Ideal R => I * span {x} := fun _ _ =>
(span_singleton_mul_left_inj hx).mp
theorem eq_span_singleton_mul {x : R} (I J : Ideal R) :
I = span {x} * J ↔ (∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI) ∧ ∀ z ∈ J, x * z ∈ I := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_span_singleton_mul_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_iff]
theorem span_singleton_mul_eq_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} (I J : Ideal R) :
span {x} * I = span {y} * J ↔
(∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ) ∧ ∀ zJ ∈ J, ∃ zI ∈ I, x * zI = y * zJ := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem prod_span {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → Set R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, Ideal.span (I i)) = Ideal.span (∏ i ∈ s, I i) :=
Submodule.prod_span s I
theorem prod_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, Ideal.span ({I i} : Set R)) = Ideal.span {∏ i ∈ s, I i} :=
Submodule.prod_span_singleton s I
@[simp]
theorem multiset_prod_span_singleton (m : Multiset R) :
(m.map fun x => Ideal.span {x}).prod = Ideal.span ({Multiset.prod m} : Set R) :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) fun a m ih => by
simp only [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, ih, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem finset_inf_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → R)
(hI : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (IsCoprime on I)) :
(s.inf fun i => Ideal.span ({I i} : Set R)) = Ideal.span {∏ i ∈ s, I i} := by
ext x
simp only [Submodule.mem_finset_inf, Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
exact ⟨Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime hI, fun h i hi => (Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem _ hi).trans h⟩
theorem iInf_span_singleton {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {I : ι → R}
(hI : ∀ (i j) (_ : i ≠ j), IsCoprime (I i) (I j)) :
⨅ i, span ({I i} : Set R) = span {∏ i, I i} := by
rw [← Finset.inf_univ_eq_iInf, finset_inf_span_singleton]
rwa [Finset.coe_univ, Set.pairwise_univ]
theorem iInf_span_singleton_natCast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
{I : ι → ℕ} (hI : Pairwise fun i j => (I i).Coprime (I j)) :
⨅ (i : ι), span {(I i : R)} = span {((∏ i : ι, I i : ℕ) : R)} := by
rw [iInf_span_singleton, Nat.cast_prod]
exact fun i j h ↦ (hI h).cast
theorem sup_eq_top_iff_isCoprime {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) :
span ({x} : Set R) ⊔ span {y} = ⊤ ↔ IsCoprime x y := by
rw [eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_sup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, hu, v, hv, h1⟩
rw [mem_span_singleton'] at hu hv
rw [← hu.choose_spec, ← hv.choose_spec] at h1
exact ⟨_, _, h1⟩
· exact fun ⟨u, v, h1⟩ =>
⟨_, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, _, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, h1⟩
theorem mul_le_inf : I * J ≤ I ⊓ J :=
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj => ⟨I.mul_mem_right s hri, J.mul_mem_left r hsj⟩
theorem multiset_prod_le_inf {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} : s.prod ≤ s.inf := by
classical
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· rw [Multiset.inf_zero]
exact le_top
intro a s ih
rw [Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.inf_cons]
exact le_trans mul_le_inf (inf_le_inf le_rfl ih)
theorem prod_le_inf {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} : s.prod f ≤ s.inf f :=
multiset_prod_le_inf
theorem mul_eq_inf_of_coprime (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * J = I ⊓ J :=
le_antisymm mul_le_inf fun r ⟨hri, hrj⟩ =>
let ⟨s, hsi, t, htj, hst⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 h)
mul_one r ▸
hst ▸
(mul_add r s t).symm ▸ Ideal.add_mem (I * J) (mul_mem_mul_rev hsi hrj) (mul_mem_mul hri htj)
theorem sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ⊔ J * K = I ⊔ K :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left mul_le_left _) fun i hi => by
rw [eq_top_iff_one] at h; rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at h hi ⊢
obtain ⟨i1, hi1, j, hj, h⟩ := h; obtain ⟨i', hi', k, hk, hi⟩ := hi
refine ⟨_, add_mem hi' (mul_mem_right k _ hi1), _, mul_mem_mul hj hk, ?_⟩
rw [add_assoc, ← add_mul, h, one_mul, hi]
theorem sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_right (h : I ⊔ K = ⊤) : I ⊔ J * K = I ⊔ J := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left h
theorem mul_sup_eq_of_coprime_left (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * K ⊔ J = K ⊔ J := by
rw [sup_comm] at h
rw [sup_comm, sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left h, sup_comm]
theorem mul_sup_eq_of_coprime_right (h : K ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * K ⊔ J = I ⊔ J := by
rw [sup_comm] at h
rw [sup_comm, sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_right h, sup_comm]
theorem sup_prod_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → I ⊔ J i = ⊤) :
(I ⊔ ∏ i ∈ s, J i) = ⊤ :=
Finset.prod_induction _ (fun J => I ⊔ J = ⊤)
(fun _ _ hJ hK => (sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left hJ).trans hK)
(by simp_rw [one_eq_top, sup_top_eq]) h
theorem sup_multiset_prod_eq_top {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} (h : ∀ p ∈ s, I ⊔ p = ⊤) :
I ⊔ Multiset.prod s = ⊤ :=
Multiset.prod_induction (I ⊔ · = ⊤) s (fun _ _ hp hq ↦ (sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left hp).trans hq)
(by simp only [one_eq_top, ge_iff_le, top_le_iff, le_top, sup_of_le_right]) h
theorem sup_iInf_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → I ⊔ J i = ⊤) :
(I ⊔ ⨅ i ∈ s, J i) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <|
le_of_eq_of_le (sup_prod_eq_top h).symm <|
sup_le_sup_left (le_of_le_of_eq prod_le_inf <| Finset.inf_eq_iInf _ _) _
theorem prod_sup_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → J i ⊔ I = ⊤) :
(∏ i ∈ s, J i) ⊔ I = ⊤ := by rw [sup_comm, sup_prod_eq_top]; intro i hi; rw [sup_comm, h i hi]
theorem iInf_sup_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → J i ⊔ I = ⊤) :
(⨅ i ∈ s, J i) ⊔ I = ⊤ := by rw [sup_comm, sup_iInf_eq_top]; intro i hi; rw [sup_comm, h i hi]
theorem sup_pow_eq_top {n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ⊔ J ^ n = ⊤ := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact sup_prod_eq_top fun _ _ => h
theorem pow_sup_eq_top {n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ^ n ⊔ J = ⊤ := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact prod_sup_eq_top fun _ _ => h
theorem pow_sup_pow_eq_top {m n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ^ m ⊔ J ^ n = ⊤ :=
sup_pow_eq_top (pow_sup_eq_top h)
variable (I) in
@[simp]
theorem mul_top : I * ⊤ = I :=
Ideal.mul_comm ⊤ I ▸ Submodule.top_smul I
/-- A product of ideals in an integral domain is zero if and only if one of the terms is zero. -/
@[simp]
lemma multiset_prod_eq_bot {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [IsDomain R] {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} :
s.prod = ⊥ ↔ ⊥ ∈ s :=
Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff
theorem span_pair_mul_span_pair (w x y z : R) :
(span {w, x} : Ideal R) * span {y, z} = span {w * y, w * z, x * y, x * z} := by
simp_rw [span_insert, sup_mul, mul_sup, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, sup_assoc]
theorem isCoprime_iff_codisjoint : IsCoprime I J ↔ Codisjoint I J := by
rw [IsCoprime, codisjoint_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
rw [eq_top_iff_one]
apply (show x * I + y * J ≤ I ⊔ J from
sup_le (mul_le_left.trans le_sup_left) (mul_le_left.trans le_sup_right))
rw [hxy]
simp only [one_eq_top, Submodule.mem_top]
· intro h
refine ⟨1, 1, ?_⟩
simpa only [one_eq_top, top_mul, Submodule.add_eq_sup]
theorem isCoprime_of_isMaximal [I.IsMaximal] [J.IsMaximal] (ne : I ≠ J) : IsCoprime I J := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, isMaximal_def] at *
exact IsCoatom.codisjoint_of_ne ‹_› ‹_› ne
theorem isCoprime_iff_add : IsCoprime I J ↔ I + J = 1 := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, add_eq_sup, one_eq_top]
theorem isCoprime_iff_exists : IsCoprime I J ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [← add_eq_one_iff, isCoprime_iff_add]
theorem isCoprime_iff_sup_eq : IsCoprime I J ↔ I ⊔ J = ⊤ := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff]
open List in
theorem isCoprime_tfae : TFAE [IsCoprime I J, Codisjoint I J, I + J = 1,
∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1, I ⊔ J = ⊤] := by
rw [← isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, ← isCoprime_iff_add, ← isCoprime_iff_exists,
← isCoprime_iff_sup_eq]
simp
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.codisjoint (h : IsCoprime I J) : Codisjoint I J :=
isCoprime_iff_codisjoint.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.add_eq (h : IsCoprime I J) : I + J = 1 := isCoprime_iff_add.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.exists (h : IsCoprime I J) : ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 :=
isCoprime_iff_exists.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.sup_eq (h : IsCoprime I J) : I ⊔ J = ⊤ := isCoprime_iff_sup_eq.mp h
theorem inf_eq_mul_of_isCoprime (coprime : IsCoprime I J) : I ⊓ J = I * J :=
(Ideal.mul_eq_inf_of_coprime coprime.sup_eq).symm
theorem isCoprime_span_singleton_iff (x y : R) :
IsCoprime (span <| singleton x) (span <| singleton y) ↔ IsCoprime x y := by
simp_rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, eq_top_iff_one, mem_span_singleton_sup,
mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, _, ⟨b, rfl⟩, e⟩; exact ⟨a, b, mul_comm b y ▸ e⟩
· rintro ⟨a, b, e⟩; exact ⟨a, _, ⟨b, rfl⟩, mul_comm y b ▸ e⟩
theorem isCoprime_biInf {J : ι → Ideal R} {s : Finset ι}
(hf : ∀ j ∈ s, IsCoprime I (J j)) : IsCoprime I (⨅ j ∈ s, J j) := by
classical
simp_rw [isCoprime_iff_add] at *
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty =>
simp
| insert i s _ hs =>
rw [Finset.iInf_insert, inf_comm, one_eq_top, eq_top_iff, ← one_eq_top]
set K := ⨅ j ∈ s, J j
calc
1 = I + K := (hs fun j hj ↦ hf j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)).symm
_ = I + K*(I + J i) := by rw [hf i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s), mul_one]
| _ = (1+K)*I + K*J i := by ring
_ ≤ I + K ⊓ J i := add_le_add mul_le_left mul_le_inf
/-- The radical of an ideal `I` consists of the elements `r` such that `r ^ n ∈ I` for some `n`. -/
def radical (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R where
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Operations.lean | 696 | 700 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Nat
/-!
# Properties of `Nat.gcd`, `Nat.lcm`, and `Nat.Coprime`
Definitions are provided in batteries.
Generalizations of these are provided in a later file as `GCDMonoid.gcd` and
`GCDMonoid.lcm`.
Note that the global `IsCoprime` is not a straightforward generalization of `Nat.Coprime`, see
`Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime` for the connection between the two.
Most of this file could be moved to batteries as well.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
namespace Nat
variable {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : ℕ}
/-! ### `gcd` -/
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℕ} (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : ℕ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
d = a.gcd b :=
(dvd_antisymm (hd _ (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b)) (dvd_gcd hda hdb)).symm
/-! Lemmas where one argument consists of addition of a multiple of the other -/
@[simp]
theorem pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one (a b c : ℕ) : (a ^ c - 1) % (a ^ b - 1) = a ^ (c % b) - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos a with rfl | ha0
· simp [zero_pow_eq]; split_ifs <;> simp
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ha0 with rfl | ha1
· simp
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with rfl | hb0
· simp
rcases lt_or_le c b with h | h
· rw [mod_eq_of_lt, mod_eq_of_lt h]
rwa [Nat.sub_lt_sub_iff_right (one_le_pow c a ha0), Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right ha1]
· suffices a ^ (c - b + b) - 1 = a ^ (c - b) * (a ^ b - 1) + (a ^ (c - b) - 1) by
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel h, add_mod_right, this, add_mod, mul_mod, mod_self,
mul_zero, zero_mod, zero_add, mod_mod, pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one]
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc (one_le_pow (c - b) a ha0), ← mul_add_one, pow_add,
Nat.sub_add_cancel (one_le_pow b a ha0)]
@[simp]
theorem pow_sub_one_gcd_pow_sub_one (a b c : ℕ) :
gcd (a ^ b - 1) (a ^ c - 1) = a ^ gcd b c - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with rfl | hb
· simp
replace hb : c % b < b := mod_lt c hb
rw [gcd_rec, pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one, pow_sub_one_gcd_pow_sub_one, ← gcd_rec]
/-! ### `lcm` -/
theorem lcm_dvd_mul (m n : ℕ) : lcm m n ∣ m * n :=
lcm_dvd (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {m n k : ℕ} : lcm m n ∣ k ↔ m ∣ k ∧ n ∣ k :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans h, (dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans h⟩, and_imp.2 lcm_dvd⟩
theorem lcm_pos {m n : ℕ} : 0 < m → 0 < n → 0 < m.lcm n := by
simp_rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact lcm_ne_zero
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = m * n.lcm k := by
apply dvd_antisymm
· exact lcm_dvd (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_left n k)) (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_right n k))
· have h : m ∣ lcm (m * n) (m * k) := (dvd_mul_right m n).trans (dvd_lcm_left (m * n) (m * k))
rw [← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h, lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h, dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h,
← lcm_dvd_iff]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * n := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm k n, lcm_mul_left, mul_comm]
/-!
### `Coprime`
See also `Nat.coprime_of_dvd` and `Nat.coprime_of_dvd'` to prove `Nat.Coprime m n`.
-/
theorem Coprime.lcm_eq_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : Coprime m n) : lcm m n = m * n := by
rw [← one_mul (lcm m n), ← h.gcd_eq_one, gcd_mul_lcm]
theorem Coprime.symmetric : Symmetric Coprime := fun _ _ => Coprime.symm
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k n) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ m :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_left h n⟩
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k m) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ n :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_right h m⟩
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_self_right {m n : ℕ} : Coprime m (n + m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_self_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_add_right {m n : ℕ} : Coprime m (m + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [add_comm, coprime_add_self_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_self_left {m n : ℕ} : Coprime (m + n) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_self_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_add_left {m n : ℕ} : Coprime (m + n) m ↔ Coprime n m := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_self_add_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (n + k * m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_right_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (n + m * k) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_left_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_right_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (k * m + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_right_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_left_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (m * k + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_left_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_right_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (m + k * n) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_right_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_left_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (m + n * k) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_left_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_right_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (k * n + m) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_right_add_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_left_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (n * k + m) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_left_add_left]
lemma add_coprime_iff_left (h : c ∣ b) : Coprime (a + b) c ↔ Coprime a c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
lemma add_coprime_iff_right (h : c ∣ a) : Coprime (a + b) c ↔ Coprime b c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
lemma coprime_add_iff_left (h : a ∣ c) : Coprime a (b + c) ↔ Coprime a b := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
lemma coprime_add_iff_right (h : a ∣ b) : Coprime a (b + c) ↔ Coprime a c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
-- TODO: Replace `Nat.Coprime.coprime_dvd_left`
lemma Coprime.of_dvd_left (ha : a₁ ∣ a₂) (h : Coprime a₂ b) : Coprime a₁ b := h.coprime_dvd_left ha
-- TODO: Replace `Nat.Coprime.coprime_dvd_right`
lemma Coprime.of_dvd_right (hb : b₁ ∣ b₂) (h : Coprime a b₂) : Coprime a b₁ :=
h.coprime_dvd_right hb
lemma Coprime.of_dvd (ha : a₁ ∣ a₂) (hb : b₁ ∣ b₂) (h : Coprime a₂ b₂) : Coprime a₁ b₁ :=
(h.of_dvd_left ha).of_dvd_right hb
@[simp]
theorem coprime_sub_self_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime (n - m) m ↔ Coprime n m := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_sub_self_left h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_sub_self_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime m (n - m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_sub_self_right h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_sub_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime (n - m) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_self_sub_left h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_sub_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime n (n - m) ↔ Coprime n m := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_self_sub_right h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_pow_left_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a b : ℕ) :
Nat.Coprime (a ^ n) b ↔ Nat.Coprime a b := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_of_gt hn)
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.coprime_mul_iff_left]
exact ⟨And.right, fun hab => ⟨hab.pow_left _, hab⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coprime_pow_right_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a b : ℕ) :
Nat.Coprime a (b ^ n) ↔ Nat.Coprime a b := by
rw [Nat.coprime_comm, coprime_pow_left_iff hn, Nat.coprime_comm]
theorem not_coprime_zero_zero : ¬Coprime 0 0 := by simp
theorem coprime_one_left_iff (n : ℕ) : Coprime 1 n ↔ True := by simp [Coprime]
theorem coprime_one_right_iff (n : ℕ) : Coprime n 1 ↔ True := by simp [Coprime]
theorem gcd_mul_of_coprime_of_dvd {a b c : ℕ} (hac : Coprime a c) (b_dvd_c : b ∣ c) :
gcd (a * b) c = b := by
rcases exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd b_dvd_c with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [gcd_mul_right]
convert one_mul b
exact Coprime.coprime_mul_right_right hac
theorem Coprime.eq_of_mul_eq_zero {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) (hmn : m * n = 0) :
m = 0 ∧ n = 1 ∨ m = 1 ∧ n = 0 :=
(Nat.mul_eq_zero.mp hmn).imp (fun hm => ⟨hm, n.coprime_zero_left.mp <| hm ▸ h⟩) fun hn =>
let eq := hn ▸ h.symm
⟨m.coprime_zero_left.mp <| eq, hn⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias prodDvdAndDvdOfDvdProd := dvdProdDvdOfDvdProd
theorem coprime_iff_isRelPrime {m n : ℕ} : m.Coprime n ↔ IsRelPrime m n := by
| simp_rw [coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, IsRelPrime, ← and_imp, ← dvd_gcd_iff, isUnit_iff_dvd_one]
exact ⟨fun h _ ↦ (h ▸ ·), (dvd_one.mp <| · dvd_rfl)⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/Basic.lean | 222 | 223 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Base
/-!
# Akra-Bazzi theorem: The polynomial growth condition
This file defines and develops an API for the polynomial growth condition that appears in the
statement of the Akra-Bazzi theorem: for the Akra-Bazzi theorem to hold, the function `g` must
satisfy the condition that `c₁ g(n) ≤ g(u) ≤ c₂ g(n)`, for u between b*n and n for any constant
`b ∈ (0,1)`.
## Implementation notes
Our definition states that the condition must hold for any `b ∈ (0,1)`. This is equivalent to
only requiring it for `b = 1/2` or any other particular value between 0 and 1. While this
could in principle make it harder to prove that a particular function grows polynomially,
this issue doesn't seem to arise in practice.
-/
open Finset Real Filter Asymptotics
open scoped Topology
namespace AkraBazziRecurrence
/-- The growth condition that the function `g` must satisfy for the Akra-Bazzi theorem to apply.
It roughly states that `c₁ g(n) ≤ g(u) ≤ c₂ g(n)`, for `u` between `b*n` and `n` for any
constant `b ∈ (0,1)`. -/
def GrowsPolynomially (f : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop :=
∀ b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1, ∃ c₁ > 0, ∃ c₂ > 0,
∀ᶠ x in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * (f x)) (c₂ * f x)
namespace GrowsPolynomially
lemma congr_of_eventuallyEq {f g : ℝ → ℝ} (hfg : f =ᶠ[atTop] g) (hg : GrowsPolynomially g) :
GrowsPolynomially f := by
intro b hb
have hg' := hg b hb
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, hg'⟩ := hg'
refine ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hg', (tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hfg, hfg]
with x hx₁ hx₂ hx₃
intro u hu
rw [hx₂ u hu.1, hx₃]
exact hx₁ u hu
lemma iff_eventuallyEq {f g : ℝ → ℝ} (h : f =ᶠ[atTop] g) :
GrowsPolynomially f ↔ GrowsPolynomially g :=
⟨fun hf => congr_of_eventuallyEq h.symm hf, fun hg => congr_of_eventuallyEq h hg⟩
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ}
lemma eventually_atTop_le {b : ℝ} (hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ≤ c * f x := by
obtain ⟨c₁, _, c₂, hc₂, h⟩ := hf b hb
refine ⟨c₂, hc₂, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [h]
exact fun _ H u hu => (H u hu).2
lemma eventually_atTop_le_nat {b : ℝ} (hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * n) n, f u ≤ c * f n := by
obtain ⟨c, hc_mem, hc⟩ := hf.eventually_atTop_le hb
exact ⟨c, hc_mem, hc.natCast_atTop⟩
lemma eventually_atTop_ge {b : ℝ} (hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, c * f x ≤ f u := by
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁, c₂, _, h⟩ := hf b hb
refine ⟨c₁, hc₁, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [h]
exact fun _ H u hu => (H u hu).1
lemma eventually_atTop_ge_nat {b : ℝ} (hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * n) n, c * f n ≤ f u := by
obtain ⟨c, hc_mem, hc⟩ := hf.eventually_atTop_ge hb
exact ⟨c, hc_mem, hc.natCast_atTop⟩
lemma eventually_zero_of_frequently_zero (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) (hf' : ∃ᶠ x in atTop, f x = 0) :
∀ᶠ x in atTop, f x = 0 := by
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, hf⟩ := hf (1/2) (by norm_num)
rw [frequently_atTop] at hf'
filter_upwards [eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr hf, eventually_gt_atTop 0] with x hx hx_pos
obtain ⟨x₀, hx₀_ge, hx₀⟩ := hf' (max x 1)
have x₀_pos := calc
0 < 1 := by norm_num
_ ≤ x₀ := le_of_max_le_right hx₀_ge
have hmain : ∀ (m : ℕ) (z : ℝ), x ≤ z →
z ∈ Set.Icc ((2 : ℝ)^(-(m : ℤ) -1) * x₀) ((2 : ℝ)^(-(m : ℤ)) * x₀) → f z = 0 := by
intro m
induction m with
| zero =>
simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, neg_zero, zero_sub, zpow_zero, one_mul] at *
specialize hx x₀ (le_of_max_le_left hx₀_ge)
simp only [hx₀, mul_zero, Set.Icc_self, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hx
refine fun z _ hz => hx _ ?_
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one] at hz
simp only [one_div, hz]
| succ k ih =>
intro z hxz hz
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at *
have hx' : x ≤ (2 : ℝ)^(-(k : ℤ) - 1) * x₀ := by
calc x ≤ z := hxz
_ ≤ _ := by simp only [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at hz; exact hz.2
specialize hx ((2 : ℝ)^(-(k : ℤ) - 1) * x₀) hx' z
specialize ih ((2 : ℝ)^(-(k : ℤ) - 1) * x₀) hx' ?ineq
case ineq =>
rw [Set.left_mem_Icc]
gcongr
· norm_num
· omega
simp only [ih, mul_zero, Set.Icc_self, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hx
refine hx ⟨?lb₁, ?ub₁⟩
case lb₁ =>
rw [one_div, ← zpow_neg_one, ← mul_assoc, ← zpow_add₀ (by norm_num)]
have h₁ : (-1 : ℤ) + (-k - 1) = -k - 2 := by ring
have h₂ : -(k + (1 : ℤ)) - 1 = -k - 2 := by ring
rw [h₁]
rw [h₂] at hz
exact hz.1
case ub₁ =>
have := hz.2
simp only [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at this
exact this
refine hmain ⌊-logb 2 (x / x₀)⌋₊ x le_rfl ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb =>
rw [← le_div_iff₀ x₀_pos]
refine (logb_le_logb (b := 2) (by norm_num) (zpow_pos (by norm_num) _)
(by positivity)).mp ?_
rw [← rpow_intCast, logb_rpow (by norm_num) (by norm_num), ← neg_le_neg_iff]
simp only [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_one, neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add]
calc -logb 2 (x/x₀) ≤ ⌈-logb 2 (x/x₀)⌉₊ := Nat.le_ceil (-logb 2 (x / x₀))
_ ≤ _ := by rw [add_comm]; exact_mod_cast Nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one _
case ub =>
rw [← div_le_iff₀ x₀_pos]
refine (logb_le_logb (b := 2) (by norm_num) (by positivity)
(zpow_pos (by norm_num) _)).mp ?_
rw [← rpow_intCast, logb_rpow (by norm_num) (by norm_num), ← neg_le_neg_iff]
simp only [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast, neg_neg]
have : 0 ≤ -logb 2 (x / x₀) := by
rw [neg_nonneg]
refine logb_nonpos (by norm_num) (by positivity) ?_
rw [div_le_one x₀_pos]
exact le_of_max_le_left hx₀_ge
exact_mod_cast Nat.floor_le this
lemma eventually_atTop_nonneg_or_nonpos (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
(∀ᶠ x in atTop, 0 ≤ f x) ∨ (∀ᶠ x in atTop, f x ≤ 0) := by
obtain ⟨c₁, _, c₂, _, h⟩ := hf (1/2) (by norm_num)
match lt_trichotomy c₁ c₂ with
| .inl hlt => -- c₁ < c₂
left
filter_upwards [h, eventually_ge_atTop 0] with x hx hx_nonneg
have h' : 3 / 4 * x ∈ Set.Icc (1 / 2 * x) x := by
rw [Set.mem_Icc]
exact ⟨by gcongr ?_ * x; norm_num, by linarith⟩
have hu := hx (3/4 * x) h'
have hu := Set.nonempty_of_mem hu
rw [Set.nonempty_Icc] at hu
have hu' : 0 ≤ (c₂ - c₁) * f x := by linarith
exact nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right hu' (by linarith)
| .inr (.inr hgt) => -- c₂ < c₁
right
filter_upwards [h, eventually_ge_atTop 0] with x hx hx_nonneg
have h' : 3 / 4 * x ∈ Set.Icc (1 / 2 * x) x := by
rw [Set.mem_Icc]
exact ⟨by gcongr ?_ * x; norm_num, by linarith⟩
have hu := hx (3/4 * x) h'
have hu := Set.nonempty_of_mem hu
rw [Set.nonempty_Icc] at hu
have hu' : (c₁ - c₂) * f x ≤ 0 := by linarith
exact nonpos_of_mul_nonpos_right hu' (by linarith)
| .inr (.inl heq) => -- c₁ = c₂
have hmain : ∃ c, ∀ᶠ x in atTop, f x = c := by
simp only [heq, Set.Icc_self, Set.mem_singleton_iff, one_mul] at h
rw [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n₀, hn₀⟩ := h
refine ⟨f (max n₀ 2), ?_⟩
rw [eventually_atTop]
refine ⟨max n₀ 2, ?_⟩
refine Real.induction_Ico_mul _ 2 (by norm_num) (by positivity) ?base ?step
case base =>
intro x ⟨hxlb, hxub⟩
have h₁ := calc n₀ ≤ 1 * max n₀ 2 := by simp
_ ≤ 2 * max n₀ 2 := by gcongr; norm_num
have h₂ := hn₀ (2 * max n₀ 2) h₁ (max n₀ 2) ⟨by simp [hxlb], by linarith⟩
rw [h₂]
exact hn₀ (2 * max n₀ 2) h₁ x ⟨by simp [hxlb], le_of_lt hxub⟩
case step =>
intro n hn hyp_ind z hz
have z_nonneg : 0 ≤ z := by
calc (0 : ℝ) ≤ (2 : ℝ)^n * max n₀ 2 := by
exact mul_nonneg (pow_nonneg (by norm_num) _) (by norm_num)
_ ≤ z := by exact_mod_cast hz.1
have le_2n : max n₀ 2 ≤ (2 : ℝ)^n * max n₀ 2 := by
nth_rewrite 1 [← one_mul (max n₀ 2)]
gcongr
exact one_le_pow₀ (by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) ≤ 2)
have n₀_le_z : n₀ ≤ z := by
calc n₀ ≤ max n₀ 2 := by simp
_ ≤ (2 : ℝ)^n * max n₀ 2 := le_2n
_ ≤ _ := by exact_mod_cast hz.1
have fz_eq_c₂fz : f z = c₂ * f z := hn₀ z n₀_le_z z ⟨by linarith, le_rfl⟩
have z_to_half_z' : f (1/2 * z) = c₂ * f z := hn₀ z n₀_le_z (1/2 * z) ⟨le_rfl, by linarith⟩
have z_to_half_z : f (1/2 * z) = f z := by rwa [← fz_eq_c₂fz] at z_to_half_z'
have half_z_to_base : f (1/2 * z) = f (max n₀ 2) := by
refine hyp_ind (1/2 * z) ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb =>
calc max n₀ 2 ≤ ((1 : ℝ)/(2 : ℝ)) * (2 : ℝ) ^ 1 * max n₀ 2 := by simp
_ ≤ ((1 : ℝ)/(2 : ℝ)) * (2 : ℝ) ^ n * max n₀ 2 := by gcongr; norm_num
_ ≤ _ := by rw [mul_assoc]; gcongr; exact_mod_cast hz.1
case ub =>
have h₁ : (2 : ℝ)^n = ((1 : ℝ)/(2 : ℝ)) * (2 : ℝ)^(n+1) := by
rw [one_div, pow_add, pow_one]
ring
rw [h₁, mul_assoc]
gcongr
exact_mod_cast hz.2
rw [← z_to_half_z, half_z_to_base]
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := hmain
cases le_or_lt 0 c with
| inl hpos =>
exact Or.inl <| by filter_upwards [hc] with _ hc; simpa only [hc]
| inr hneg =>
right
filter_upwards [hc] with x hc
exact le_of_lt <| by simpa only [hc]
lemma eventually_atTop_zero_or_pos_or_neg (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
(∀ᶠ x in atTop, f x = 0) ∨ (∀ᶠ x in atTop, 0 < f x) ∨ (∀ᶠ x in atTop, f x < 0) := by
if h : ∃ᶠ x in atTop, f x = 0 then
exact Or.inl <| eventually_zero_of_frequently_zero hf h
else
rw [not_frequently] at h
push_neg at h
cases eventually_atTop_nonneg_or_nonpos hf with
| inl h' =>
refine Or.inr (Or.inl ?_)
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [eventually_and]
exact ⟨h', by filter_upwards [h] with x hx; exact hx.symm⟩
| inr h' =>
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ?_)
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [eventually_and]
exact ⟨h', h⟩
protected lemma neg {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) : GrowsPolynomially (-f) := by
intro b hb
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, hf⟩ := hf b hb
refine ⟨c₂, hc₂_mem, c₁, hc₁_mem, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx
intro u hu
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, Set.neg_mem_Icc_iff, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, neg_neg]
exact hx u hu
| protected lemma neg_iff {f : ℝ → ℝ} : GrowsPolynomially f ↔ GrowsPolynomially (-f) :=
⟨fun hf => hf.neg, fun hf => by rw [← neg_neg f]; exact hf.neg⟩
| Mathlib/Computability/AkraBazzi/GrowsPolynomially.lean | 263 | 264 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Intervals as multisets
This file defines intervals as multisets.
## Main declarations
In a `LocallyFiniteOrder`,
* `Multiset.Icc`: Closed-closed interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ico`: Closed-open interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ioc`: Open-closed interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ioo`: Open-open interval as a multiset.
In a `LocallyFiniteOrderTop`,
* `Multiset.Ici`: Closed-infinite interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ioi`: Open-infinite interval as a multiset.
In a `LocallyFiniteOrderBot`,
* `Multiset.Iic`: Infinite-open interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Iio`: Infinite-closed interval as a multiset.
## TODO
Do we really need this file at all? (March 2024)
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Multiset
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b x : α}
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x` and `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Icc a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Icc (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Icc a b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x` and `x < b`. Basically `Set.Ico a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Ico (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ico a b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a < x` and `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Ioc a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Ioc (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ioc a b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a < x` and `x < b`. Basically `Set.Ioo a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Ioo (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ioo a b).val
@[simp] lemma mem_Icc : x ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b := by rw [Icc, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Icc]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ico : x ∈ Ico a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b := by rw [Ico, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ico]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioc : x ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b := by rw [Ioc, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ioc]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioo : x ∈ Ioo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b := by rw [Ioo, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ioo]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a x : α}
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x`. Basically `Set.Ici a` as a multiset. -/
def Ici (a : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ici a).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a < x`. Basically `Set.Ioi a` as a multiset. -/
def Ioi (a : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ioi a).val
@[simp] lemma mem_Ici : x ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ x := by rw [Ici, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ici]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioi : x ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < x := by rw [Ioi, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ioi]
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {b x : α}
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Iic b` as a multiset. -/
def Iic (b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Iic b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `x < b`. Basically `Set.Iio b` as a multiset. -/
def Iio (b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Iio b).val
@[simp] lemma mem_Iic : x ∈ Iic b ↔ x ≤ b := by rw [Iic, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Iic]
@[simp] lemma mem_Iio : x ∈ Iio b ↔ x < b := by rw [Iio, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Iio]
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem nodup_Icc : (Icc a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
theorem nodup_Ico : (Ico a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
theorem nodup_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
theorem nodup_Ioo : (Ioo a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_zero_iff : Icc a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [Icc, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_zero_iff : Ico a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [Ico, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_zero_iff : Ioc a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [Ioc, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_zero_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [Ioo, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_zero⟩ := Icc_eq_zero_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_zero⟩ := Ico_eq_zero_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_zero⟩ := Ioc_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_zero (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = 0 :=
eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _x hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_zero_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = 0 :=
Icc_eq_zero h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = 0 :=
Ico_eq_zero h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = 0 :=
Ioc_eq_zero h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = 0 :=
Ioo_eq_zero h.not_lt
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = 0 := by rw [Ico, Finset.Ico_self, Finset.empty_val]
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = 0 := by rw [Ioc, Finset.Ioc_self, Finset.empty_val]
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = 0 := by rw [Ioo, Finset.Ioo_self, Finset.empty_val]
variable {a}
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b :=
Finset.left_mem_Icc
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b :=
Finset.left_mem_Ico
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b :=
Finset.right_mem_Icc
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b :=
Finset.right_mem_Ioc
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b :=
Finset.left_not_mem_Ioc
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b :=
Finset.left_not_mem_Ioo
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b :=
Finset.right_not_mem_Ico
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b :=
Finset.right_not_mem_Ioo
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = ∅ := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left hca]
rfl
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = Ico a b := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le hbc]
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = Ico a c := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right hcb]
rfl
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => c ≤ x) = Ico a b := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_le_left hca]
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => b ≤ x) = ∅ := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_right_le]
rfl
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => c ≤ x) = Ico c b := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_left_le hac]
rfl
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [Icc, Finset.Icc_self, Finset.singleton_val]
theorem Ico_cons_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ::ₘ Ico a b = Icc a b := by
classical
rw [Ico, ← Finset.insert_val_of_not_mem right_not_mem_Ico, Finset.Ico_insert_right h]
rfl
theorem Ioo_cons_left (h : a < b) : a ::ₘ Ioo a b = Ico a b := by
classical
rw [Ioo, ← Finset.insert_val_of_not_mem left_not_mem_Ioo, Finset.Ioo_insert_left h]
rfl
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico {a b c d : α} (h : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico c d) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun hab hbc => by
rw [mem_Ico] at hab hbc
exact hab.2.not_le (h.trans hbc.1)
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_of_le [DecidableEq α] {a b c d : α} (h : b ≤ c) : Ico a b ∩ Ico c d = 0 :=
Multiset.inter_eq_zero_iff_disjoint.2 <| Ico_disjoint_Ico h
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x ≤ a) = {a} := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_left hab]
rfl
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : card (Ico a b) = card (Icc a b) - 1 :=
Finset.card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one _ _
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : card (Ioc a b) = card (Icc a b) - 1 :=
Finset.card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : card (Ioo a b) = card (Ico a b) - 1 :=
Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : card (Ioo a b) = card (Icc a b) - 2 :=
Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two _ _
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c d : α}
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_iff {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : α} (h : a₁ < b₁) :
Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_iff h
theorem Ico_add_Ico_eq_Ico {a b c : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
Ico a b + Ico b c = Ico a c := by
rw [add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.2 (Ico_disjoint_Ico le_rfl), Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.union_val,
Finset.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hab hbc]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico : Ico a b ∩ Ico c d = Ico (max a c) (min b d) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.inter_val, Finset.Ico_inter_Ico]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_lt (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = Ico a (min b c) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_le (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).filter fun x => c ≤ x) = Ico (max a c) b := by
rw [Ico, Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_sub_Ico_left (a b c : α) : Ico a b - Ico a c = Ico (max a c) b := by
rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.sdiff_val, Finset.Ico_diff_Ico_left]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_sub_Ico_right (a b c : α) : Ico a b - Ico c b = Ico a (min b c) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.sdiff_val, Finset.Ico_diff_Ico_right]
end LinearOrder
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Multiset.lean | 349 | 350 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Malo Jaffré
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# Slopes of convex functions
This file relates convexity/concavity of functions in a linearly ordered field and the monotonicity
of their slopes.
The main use is to show convexity/concavity from monotonicity of the derivative.
-/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] {s : Set 𝕜} {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜}
/-- If `f : 𝕜 → 𝕜` is convex, then for any three points `x < y < z` the slope of the secant line of
`f` on `[x, y]` is less than the slope of the secant line of `f` on `[y, z]`. -/
theorem ConvexOn.slope_mono_adjacent (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ s)
(hxy : x < y) (hyz : y < z) : (f y - f x) / (y - x) ≤ (f z - f y) / (z - y) := by
| have hxz := hxy.trans hyz
rw [← sub_pos] at hxy hxz hyz
suffices f y / (y - x) + f y / (z - y) ≤ f x / (y - x) + f z / (z - y) by
ring_nf at this ⊢
linarith
set a := (z - y) / (z - x)
set b := (y - x) / (z - x)
have hy : a • x + b • z = y := by field_simp [a, b]; ring
have key :=
hf.2 hx hz (show 0 ≤ a by apply div_nonneg <;> linarith)
(show 0 ≤ b by apply div_nonneg <;> linarith)
(show a + b = 1 by field_simp [a, b])
rw [hy] at key
replace key := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left key hxz.le
field_simp [a, b, mul_comm (z - x) _] at key ⊢
rw [div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right]
· linarith
· positivity
/-- If `f : 𝕜 → 𝕜` is concave, then for any three points `x < y < z` the slope of the secant line of
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Slope.lean | 26 | 45 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.MeasurableLIntegral
/-!
# Measurability of the integral against a kernel
The Bochner integral of a strongly measurable function against a kernel is strongly measurable.
## Main statements
* `MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right`: the function
`a ↦ ∫ b, f a b ∂(κ a)` is measurable, for an s-finite kernel `κ : Kernel α β` and a function
`f : α → β → E` such that `uncurry f` is measurable.
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Function Set Filter
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{κ : Kernel α β} {η : Kernel β γ} {a : α} {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem ProbabilityTheory.measurableSet_integrable ⦃f : β → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
MeasurableSet {a | Integrable f (κ a)} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and]
exact measurableSet_lt hf.enorm.lintegral_kernel measurable_const
variable [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {η : Kernel (α × β) γ} [IsSFiniteKernel η]
theorem ProbabilityTheory.measurableSet_kernel_integrable ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) :
MeasurableSet {x | Integrable (f x) (κ x)} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.of_uncurry_left.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and]
exact measurableSet_lt (Measurable.lintegral_kernel_prod_right hf.enorm) measurable_const
open ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
omit [IsSFiniteKernel κ] in
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel ⦃f : β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x ↦ ∫ y, f y ∂κ x := by
classical
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
have : TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc β E := SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let f' n : α → E := {x | Integrable f (κ x)}.indicator fun x ↦ (s n).integral (κ x)
refine stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto (f := f') atTop (fun n ↦ ?_) ?_
· refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_integrable hf)
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.integral_eq]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun _ _ ↦ ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
exact κ.measurable_coe ((s n).measurableSet_fiber _)
· rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable f (κ x)
· simp only [mem_setOf_eq, hfx, indicator_of_mem, f']
apply tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset _ hfx
exact subset_rfl
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f x y ∂κ x := by
classical
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
haveI : TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc (α × β) E :=
SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let s' : ℕ → α → SimpleFunc β E := fun n x => (s n).comp (Prod.mk x) measurable_prodMk_left
let f' : ℕ → α → E := fun n =>
{x | Integrable (f x) (κ x)}.indicator fun x => (s' n x).integral (κ x)
have hf' : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f' n) := by
intro n; refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_kernel_integrable hf)
have : ∀ x, ((s' n x).range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ (s n).range := by
intro x; refine Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.filter_subset _ _) ?_; intro y
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range]; rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩; exact ⟨(x, z), rfl⟩
simp only [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset (this _)]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun x _ => ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
simp only [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp, preimage_comp]
apply Kernel.measurable_kernel_prodMk_left
exact (s n).measurableSet_fiber x
have h2f' : Tendsto f' atTop (𝓝 fun x : α => ∫ y : β, f x y ∂κ x) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable (f x) (κ x)
· have (n) : Integrable (s' n x) (κ x) := by
apply (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm).mono' (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable
filter_upwards with y
simp_rw [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp]; exact SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
simp only [f', hfx, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral _ (this _), indicator_of_mem,
mem_setOf_eq]
refine
tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence (fun y => ‖f x y‖ + ‖f x y‖)
(fun n => (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable) (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm) ?_ ?_
· -- Porting note: was
-- exact fun n => Eventually.of_forall fun y =>
-- SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
exact fun n => Eventually.of_forall fun y =>
| SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le hf.measurable (by simp) (x, y) n
· refine Eventually.of_forall fun y => SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf.measurable (by simp) ?_
apply subset_closure
simp [-uncurry_apply_pair]
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
exact stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto _ hf' h2f'
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/MeasurableIntegral.lean | 113 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
/-!
# Adjoint of operators on Hilbert spaces
Given an operator `A : E →L[𝕜] F`, where `E` and `F` are Hilbert spaces, its adjoint
`adjoint A : F →L[𝕜] E` is the unique operator such that `⟪x, A y⟫ = ⟪adjoint A x, y⟫` for all
`x` and `y`.
We then use this to put a C⋆-algebra structure on `E →L[𝕜] E` with the adjoint as the star
operation.
This construction is used to define an adjoint for linear maps (i.e. not continuous) between
finite dimensional spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint : (E →L[𝕜] F) ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] (F →L[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a continuous
linear map, bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric equivalence.
* `LinearMap.adjoint : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ⋆[𝕜] (F →ₗ[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a linear map between
finite-dimensional spaces, this time only as a conjugate-linear equivalence, since there is no
norm defined on these maps.
## Implementation notes
* The continuous conjugate-linear version `adjointAux` is only an intermediate
definition and is not meant to be used outside this file.
## Tags
adjoint
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 G]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-! ### Adjoint operator -/
open InnerProductSpace
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace G]
-- Note: made noncomputable to stop excess compilation
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/7103
/-- The adjoint, as a continuous conjugate-linear map. This is only meant as an auxiliary
definition for the main definition `adjoint`, where this is bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric
equivalence. -/
noncomputable def adjointAux : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L⋆[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] E :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.compSL _ _ _ _ _ ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E →L⋆[𝕜] E)).comp
(toSesqForm : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L[𝕜] F →L⋆[𝕜] NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E)
@[simp]
theorem adjointAux_apply (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : F) :
adjointAux A x = ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E → E) ((toSesqForm A) x) :=
rfl
theorem adjointAux_inner_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪adjointAux A y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ := by
rw [adjointAux_apply, toDual_symm_apply, toSesqForm_apply_coe, coe_comp', innerSL_apply_coe,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem adjointAux_inner_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) :
⟪x, adjointAux A y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, adjointAux_inner_left, inner_conj_symm]
variable [CompleteSpace F]
theorem adjointAux_adjointAux (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : adjointAux (adjointAux A) = A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
rw [adjointAux_inner_right, adjointAux_inner_left]
@[simp]
theorem adjointAux_norm (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : ‖adjointAux A‖ = ‖A‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
rw [adjointAux_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
exact toSesqForm_apply_norm_le
· nth_rw 1 [← adjointAux_adjointAux A]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
rw [adjointAux_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
exact toSesqForm_apply_norm_le
/-- The adjoint of a bounded operator `A` from a Hilbert space `E` to another Hilbert space `F`,
denoted as `A†`. -/
def adjoint : (E →L[𝕜] F) ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofSurjective { adjointAux with norm_map' := adjointAux_norm } fun A =>
⟨adjointAux A, adjointAux_adjointAux A⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[InnerProduct] postfix:1000 "†" => ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint
open InnerProduct
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪(A†) y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ :=
adjointAux_inner_left A x y
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪x, (A†) y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ :=
adjointAux_inner_right A x y
/-- The adjoint is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_adjoint (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : A†† = A :=
adjointAux_adjointAux A
/-- The adjoint of the composition of two operators is the composition of the two adjoints
in reverse order. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_comp (A : F →L[𝕜] G) (B : E →L[𝕜] F) : (A ∘L B)† = B† ∘L A† := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
simp only [adjoint_inner_right, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Function.comp_apply]
theorem apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ ^ 2 = re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ := by
have h : ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ = ⟪A x, A x⟫ := by rw [← adjoint_inner_left]; rfl
rw [h, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq (𝕜 := 𝕜) _]
theorem apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫) := by
rw [← apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_left, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
theorem apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ ^ 2 = re ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫ := by
have h : ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫ = ⟪A x, A x⟫ := by rw [← adjoint_inner_right]; rfl
rw [h, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq (𝕜 := 𝕜) _]
theorem apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫) := by
rw [← apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_right, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (B : F →L[𝕜] E) : A = B† ↔ ∀ x y, ⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
ext x
exact ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => by simp only [adjoint_inner_left, h x y]
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_id :
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E) = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E := by
refine Eq.symm ?_
rw [eq_adjoint_iff]
simp
theorem _root_.Submodule.adjoint_subtypeL (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
U.subtypeL† = U.orthogonalProjection := by
symm
rw [eq_adjoint_iff]
intro x u
rw [U.coe_inner, U.inner_orthogonalProjection_left_eq_right,
U.orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self]
rfl
theorem _root_.Submodule.adjoint_orthogonalProjection (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
(U.orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] U)† = U.subtypeL := by
rw [← U.adjoint_subtypeL, adjoint_adjoint]
/-- `E →L[𝕜] E` is a star algebra with the adjoint as the star operation. -/
instance : Star (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint⟩
instance : InvolutiveStar (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_adjoint⟩
instance : StarMul (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_comp⟩
instance : StarRing (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearIsometryEquiv.map_add adjoint⟩
instance : StarModule 𝕜 (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smulₛₗ adjoint⟩
theorem star_eq_adjoint (A : E →L[𝕜] E) : star A = A† :=
rfl
/-- A continuous linear operator is self-adjoint iff it is equal to its adjoint. -/
theorem isSelfAdjoint_iff' {A : E →L[𝕜] E} : IsSelfAdjoint A ↔ ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A = A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem norm_adjoint_comp_self (A : E →L[𝕜] F) :
‖ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A ∘L A‖ = ‖A‖ * ‖A‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· calc
‖A† ∘L A‖ ≤ ‖A†‖ * ‖A‖ := opNorm_comp_le _ _
_ = ‖A‖ * ‖A‖ := by rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
· rw [← sq, ← Real.sqrt_le_sqrt_iff (norm_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
refine opNorm_le_bound _ (Real.sqrt_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
have :=
calc
re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ ≤ ‖(A† ∘L A) x‖ * ‖x‖ := re_inner_le_norm _ _
_ ≤ ‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_opNorm _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
calc
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫) := by rw [apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_left]
_ ≤ √(‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt this
_ = √‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc, Real.sqrt_mul (norm_nonneg _) (‖x‖ * ‖x‖),
Real.sqrt_mul_self (norm_nonneg x)]
/-- The C⋆-algebra instance when `𝕜 := ℂ` can be found in
`Analysis.CStarAlgebra.ContinuousLinearMap`. -/
instance : CStarRing (E →L[𝕜] E) where
norm_mul_self_le x := le_of_eq <| Eq.symm <| norm_adjoint_comp_self x
theorem isAdjointPair_inner (A : E →L[𝕜] F) :
LinearMap.IsAdjointPair (sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜)
(sesqFormOfInner : F →ₗ[𝕜] F →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜) A (A†) := by
intro x y
simp only [sesqFormOfInner_apply_apply, adjoint_inner_left, coe_coe]
end ContinuousLinearMap
/-! ### Self-adjoint operators -/
namespace IsSelfAdjoint
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace F]
theorem adjoint_eq {A : E →L[𝕜] E} (hA : IsSelfAdjoint A) : ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A = A :=
hA
/-- Every self-adjoint operator on an inner product space is symmetric. -/
theorem isSymmetric {A : E →L[𝕜] E} (hA : IsSelfAdjoint A) : (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric := by
intro x y
rw_mod_cast [← A.adjoint_inner_right, hA.adjoint_eq]
/-- Conjugating preserves self-adjointness. -/
theorem conj_adjoint {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (S : E →L[𝕜] F) :
IsSelfAdjoint (S ∘L T ∘L ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint S) := by
rw [isSelfAdjoint_iff'] at hT ⊢
simp only [hT, adjoint_comp, adjoint_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc _ _ _
/-- Conjugating preserves self-adjointness. -/
theorem adjoint_conj {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (S : F →L[𝕜] E) :
IsSelfAdjoint (ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint S ∘L T ∘L S) := by
rw [isSelfAdjoint_iff'] at hT ⊢
simp only [hT, adjoint_comp, adjoint_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc _ _ _
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric {A : E →L[𝕜] E} :
IsSelfAdjoint A ↔ (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric :=
⟨fun hA => hA.isSymmetric, fun hA =>
ext fun x => ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => (A.adjoint_inner_left y x).symm ▸ (hA x y).symm⟩
theorem _root_.LinearMap.IsSymmetric.isSelfAdjoint {A : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hA : (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric) : IsSelfAdjoint A := by
rwa [← ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric] at hA
/-- The orthogonal projection is self-adjoint. -/
theorem _root_.orthogonalProjection_isSelfAdjoint (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
IsSelfAdjoint (U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection) :=
U.orthogonalProjection_isSymmetric.isSelfAdjoint
theorem conj_orthogonalProjection {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (U : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[CompleteSpace U] :
IsSelfAdjoint
(U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection ∘L T ∘L U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection) := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc]
nth_rw 1 [← (orthogonalProjection_isSelfAdjoint U).adjoint_eq]
exact hT.adjoint_conj _
end IsSelfAdjoint
namespace LinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E]
variable {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E}
/-- The **Hellinger--Toeplitz theorem**: Construct a self-adjoint operator from an everywhere
defined symmetric operator. -/
def IsSymmetric.toSelfAdjoint (hT : IsSymmetric T) : selfAdjoint (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨⟨T, hT.continuous⟩, ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric.mpr hT⟩
theorem IsSymmetric.coe_toSelfAdjoint (hT : IsSymmetric T) : (hT.toSelfAdjoint : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) = T :=
rfl
theorem IsSymmetric.toSelfAdjoint_apply (hT : IsSymmetric T) {x : E} :
(hT.toSelfAdjoint : E → E) x = T x :=
rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearMap
variable [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 F] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 G]
/- Porting note: Lean can't use `FiniteDimensional.complete` since it was generalized to topological
vector spaces. Use local instances instead. -/
/-- The adjoint of an operator from the finite-dimensional inner product space `E` to the
finite-dimensional inner product space `F`. -/
def adjoint : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ⋆[𝕜] F →ₗ[𝕜] E :=
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
/- Note: Instead of the two instances above, the following works:
```
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜
```
But removing one of the `have`s makes it fail. The reason is that `E` and `F` don't live
in the same universe, so the first `have` can no longer be used for `F` after its universe
metavariable has been assigned to that of `E`!
-/
((LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] F).trans
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint.toLinearEquiv).trans
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap.symm
theorem adjoint_toContinuousLinearMap (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap (LinearMap.adjoint A) =
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap A) :=
rfl
theorem adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
LinearMap.adjoint A = ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap A) :=
rfl
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_left (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪adjoint A y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ := by
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
rw [← coe_toContinuousLinearMap A, adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint_inner_left _ x y
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_right (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪x, adjoint A y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ := by
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
rw [← coe_toContinuousLinearMap A, adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint_inner_right _ x y
/-- The adjoint is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_adjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) : LinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.adjoint A) = A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
rw [adjoint_inner_right, adjoint_inner_left]
/-- The adjoint of the composition of two operators is the composition of the two adjoints
in reverse order. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_comp (A : F →ₗ[𝕜] G) (B : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
LinearMap.adjoint (A ∘ₗ B) = LinearMap.adjoint B ∘ₗ LinearMap.adjoint A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
simp only [adjoint_inner_right, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ x y, ⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
ext x
exact ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => by simp only [adjoint_inner_left, h x y]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all basis vectors `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff_basis {ι₁ : Type*} {ι₂ : Type*} (b₁ : Basis ι₁ 𝕜 E) (b₂ : Basis ι₂ 𝕜 F)
(A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ (i₁ : ι₁) (i₂ : ι₂), ⟪A (b₁ i₁), b₂ i₂⟫ = ⟪b₁ i₁, B (b₂ i₂)⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
refine Basis.ext b₁ fun i₁ => ?_
exact ext_inner_right_basis b₂ fun i₂ => by simp only [adjoint_inner_left, h i₁ i₂]
theorem eq_adjoint_iff_basis_left {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ i y, ⟪A (b i), y⟫ = ⟪b i, B y⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => Basis.ext b fun i => ?_⟩
exact ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => by simp only [h i, adjoint_inner_left]
theorem eq_adjoint_iff_basis_right {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι 𝕜 F) (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ i x, ⟪A x, b i⟫ = ⟪x, B (b i)⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
ext x
exact ext_inner_right_basis b fun i => by simp only [h i, adjoint_inner_left]
/-- `E →ₗ[𝕜] E` is a star algebra with the adjoint as the star operation. -/
instance : Star (E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint⟩
instance : InvolutiveStar (E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_adjoint⟩
instance : StarMul (E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_comp⟩
instance : StarRing (E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearEquiv.map_add adjoint⟩
instance : StarModule 𝕜 (E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearEquiv.map_smulₛₗ adjoint⟩
theorem star_eq_adjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) : star A = LinearMap.adjoint A :=
rfl
/-- A continuous linear operator is self-adjoint iff it is equal to its adjoint. -/
theorem isSelfAdjoint_iff' {A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} : IsSelfAdjoint A ↔ LinearMap.adjoint A = A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isSymmetric_iff_isSelfAdjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) : IsSymmetric A ↔ IsSelfAdjoint A := by
rw [isSelfAdjoint_iff', IsSymmetric, ← LinearMap.eq_adjoint_iff]
exact eq_comm
theorem isAdjointPair_inner (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
IsAdjointPair (sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜) (sesqFormOfInner : F →ₗ[𝕜] F →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜) A
(LinearMap.adjoint A) := by
intro x y
simp only [sesqFormOfInner_apply_apply, adjoint_inner_left]
/-- The Gram operator T†T is symmetric. -/
theorem isSymmetric_adjoint_mul_self (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) : IsSymmetric (LinearMap.adjoint T * T) := by
intro x y
simp [adjoint_inner_left, adjoint_inner_right]
/-- The Gram operator T†T is a positive operator. -/
theorem re_inner_adjoint_mul_self_nonneg (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) (x : E) :
0 ≤ re ⟪x, (LinearMap.adjoint T * T) x⟫ := by
simp only [Module.End.mul_apply, adjoint_inner_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
norm_cast
exact sq_nonneg _
@[simp]
theorem im_inner_adjoint_mul_self_eq_zero (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) (x : E) :
im ⟪x, LinearMap.adjoint T (T x)⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [Module.End.mul_apply, adjoint_inner_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
norm_cast
end LinearMap
section Unitary
variable {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 H] [CompleteSpace H]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {K : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 K] [CompleteSpace K]
theorem inner_map_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self (u : H →L[𝕜] K) :
(∀ x y : H, ⟪u x, u y⟫_𝕜 = ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜) ↔ adjoint u ∘L u = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ext fun x ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· refine ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y ↦ ?_
simpa [star_eq_adjoint, adjoint_inner_left] using h x y
· simp [← adjoint_inner_left, ← comp_apply, h]
theorem norm_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self (u : H →L[𝕜] K) :
(∀ x : H, ‖u x‖ = ‖x‖) ↔ adjoint u ∘L u = 1 := by
rw [LinearMap.norm_map_iff_inner_map_map u, u.inner_map_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self]
@[simp]
lemma _root_.LinearIsometryEquiv.adjoint_eq_symm (e : H ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] K) :
adjoint (e : H →L[𝕜] K) = e.symm :=
let e' := (e : H →L[𝕜] K)
calc
adjoint e' = adjoint e' ∘L (e' ∘L e.symm) := by
convert (adjoint e').comp_id.symm
ext
simp [e']
_ = e.symm := by
rw [← comp_assoc, norm_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self e' |>.mp e.norm_map]
exact (e.symm : K →L[𝕜] H).id_comp
@[simp]
lemma _root_.LinearIsometryEquiv.star_eq_symm (e : H ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] H) :
star (e : H →L[𝕜] H) = e.symm :=
e.adjoint_eq_symm
theorem norm_map_of_mem_unitary {u : H →L[𝕜] H} (hu : u ∈ unitary (H →L[𝕜] H)) (x : H) :
‖u x‖ = ‖x‖ :=
-- Elaborates faster with this broken out https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11299
have := unitary.star_mul_self_of_mem hu
u.norm_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self.mpr this x
|
theorem inner_map_map_of_mem_unitary {u : H →L[𝕜] H} (hu : u ∈ unitary (H →L[𝕜] H)) (x y : H) :
⟪u x, u y⟫_𝕜 = ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 :=
-- Elaborates faster with this broken out https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11299
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Adjoint.lean | 498 | 501 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.EuclideanDist
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.NormPow
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Interval
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegralEqImproper
/-!
# Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality
In this file we prove the Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality.
This states that for compactly supported `C¹`-functions between finite dimensional vector spaces,
we can bound the `L^p`-norm of `u` by the `L^q` norm of the derivative of `u`.
The bound is up to a constant that is independent of the function `u`.
Let `n` be the dimension of the domain.
The main step in the proof, which we dubbed the "grid-lines lemma" below, is a complicated
inductive argument that involves manipulating an `n+1`-fold iterated integral and a product of
`n+2` factors. In each step, one pushes one of the integral inside (all but one of)
the factors of the product using Hölder's inequality. The precise formulation of the induction
hypothesis (`MeasureTheory.GridLines.T_insert_le_T_lmarginal_singleton`) is tricky,
and none of the 5 sources we referenced stated it.
In the formalization we use the operation `MeasureTheory.lmarginal` to work with the iterated
integrals, and use `MeasureTheory.lmarginal_insert'` to conveniently push one of the integrals
inside. The Hölder's inequality step is done using `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_prod_norm_pow_le`.
The conclusions of the main results below are an estimation up to a constant multiple.
We don't really care about this constant, other than that it only depends on some pieces of data,
typically `E`, `μ`, `p` and sometimes also the codomain of `u` or the support of `u`.
We state these constants as separate definitions.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_of_eq`:
The bound holds for `1 ≤ p`, `0 < n` and `q⁻¹ = p⁻¹ - n⁻¹`
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_of_le`:
The bound holds when `1 ≤ p < n`, `0 ≤ q` and `p⁻¹ - n⁻¹ ≤ q⁻¹`.
Note that in this case the constant depends on the support of `u`.
Potentially also useful:
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_one`: this is the inequality for `q = 1`.
In this version, the codomain can be an arbitrary Banach space.
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_of_eq_inner`: in this version,
the codomain is assumed to be a Hilbert space, without restrictions on its dimension.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open Set Function Finset MeasureTheory Measure Filter
noncomputable section
variable {ι : Type*}
local prefix:max "#" => Fintype.card
/-! ## The grid-lines lemma -/
variable {A : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (A i)]
(μ : ∀ i, Measure (A i))
namespace MeasureTheory
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq ι]
namespace GridLines
/-- The "grid-lines operation" (not a standard name) which is central in the inductive proof of the
Sobolev inequality.
For a finite dependent product `Π i : ι, A i` of sigma-finite measure spaces, a finite set `s` of
indices from `ι`, and a (later assumed nonnegative) real number `p`, this operation acts on a
function `f` from `Π i, A i` into the extended nonnegative reals. The operation is to partially
integrate, in the `s` co-ordinates, the function whose value at `x : Π i, A i` is obtained by
multiplying a certain power of `f` with the product, for each co-ordinate `i` in `s`, of a certain
power of the integral of `f` along the "grid line" in the `i` direction through `x`.
We are most interested in this operation when the set `s` is the universe in `ι`, but as a proxy for
"induction on dimension" we define it for a general set `s` of co-ordinates: the `s`-grid-lines
operation on a function `f` which is constant along the co-ordinates in `sᶜ` is morally (that is, up
to type-theoretic nonsense) the same thing as the universe-grid-lines operation on the associated
function on the "lower-dimensional" space `Π i : s, A i`. -/
def T (p : ℝ) (f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Finset ι) : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞ :=
∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ^ (1 - (s.card - 1 : ℝ) * p) * ∏ i ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) ^ p ∂μ
variable {p : ℝ}
@[simp] lemma T_univ [Fintype ι] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞) (x : ∀ i, A i) :
T μ p f univ x =
∫⁻ (x : ∀ i, A i), (f x ^ (1 - (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p)
* ∏ i : ι, (∫⁻ t : A i, f (update x i t) ∂(μ i)) ^ p) ∂(.pi μ) := by
simp [T, lmarginal_singleton]
@[simp] lemma T_empty (f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞) (x : ∀ i, A i) :
T μ p f ∅ x = f x ^ (1 + p) := by
simp [T]
/-- The main inductive step in the grid-lines lemma for the Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality.
The grid-lines operation `GridLines.T` on a nonnegative function on a finitary product type is
less than or equal to the grid-lines operation of its partial integral in one co-ordinate
(the latter intuitively considered as a function on a space "one dimension down"). -/
theorem T_insert_le_T_lmarginal_singleton [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (hp₀ : 0 ≤ p) (s : Finset ι)
(hp : (s.card : ℝ) * p ≤ 1)
(i : ι) (hi : i ∉ s) {f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
T μ p f (insert i s) ≤ T μ p (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) s := by
/- The proof is a tricky computation that relies on Hölder's inequality at its heart.
The left-hand-side is an `|s|+1`-times iterated integral. Let `xᵢ` denote the `i`-th variable.
We first push the integral over the `i`-th variable as the
innermost integral. This is done in a single step with `MeasureTheory.lmarginal_insert'`,
but in fact hides a repeated application of Fubini's theorem.
The integrand is a product of `|s|+2` factors, in `|s|+1` of them we integrate over one
additional variable. We split of the factor that integrates over `xᵢ`,
and apply Hölder's inequality to the remaining factors (whose powers sum exactly to 1).
After reordering factors, and combining two factors into one we obtain the right-hand side. -/
calc T μ p f (insert i s)
= ∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s,
f ^ (1 - (s.card : ℝ) * p) * ∏ j ∈ insert i s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) ^ p ∂μ := by
-- unfold `T` and reformulate the exponents
simp_rw [T, card_insert_of_not_mem hi]
congr!
push_cast
ring
_ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, (fun x ↦ ∫⁻ (t : A i),
(f (update x i t) ^ (1 - (s.card : ℝ) * p)
* ∏ j ∈ insert i s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (update x i t) ^ p) ∂ (μ i)) ∂μ := by
-- pull out the integral over `xᵢ`
rw [lmarginal_insert' _ _ hi]
· congr! with x t
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.pow_apply, Finset.prod_apply]
· change Measurable (fun x ↦ _)
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.pow_apply, Finset.prod_apply]
refine (hf.pow_const _).mul <| Finset.measurable_prod _ ?_
exact fun _ _ ↦ hf.lmarginal μ |>.pow_const _
_ ≤ T μ p (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) s := lmarginal_mono (s := s) (fun x ↦ ?_)
-- The remainder of the computation happens within an `|s|`-fold iterated integral
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.pow_apply, Finset.prod_apply]
set X := update x i
have hF₁ : ∀ {j : ι}, Measurable fun t ↦ (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) :=
fun {_} ↦ hf.lmarginal μ |>.comp <| measurable_update _
have hF₀ : Measurable fun t ↦ f (X t) := hf.comp <| measurable_update _
let k : ℝ := s.card
have hk' : 0 ≤ 1 - k * p := by linarith only [hp]
calc ∫⁻ t, f (X t) ^ (1 - k * p)
* ∏ j ∈ insert i s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) ^ p ∂ (μ i)
= ∫⁻ t, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) (X t) ^ p * (f (X t) ^ (1 - k * p)
* ∏ j ∈ s, ((∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) ^ p)) ∂(μ i) := by
-- rewrite integrand so that `(∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s, f ∂μ) ^ p` comes first
clear_value X
congr! 2 with t
simp_rw [prod_insert hi]
ring_nf
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ p *
∫⁻ t, f (X t) ^ (1 - k * p) * ∏ j ∈ s, ((∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t)) ^ p ∂(μ i) := by
-- pull out this constant factor
have : ∀ t, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) (X t) = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x := by
intro t
rw [lmarginal_update_of_mem]
exact Iff.mpr Finset.mem_singleton rfl
simp_rw [this]
rw [lintegral_const_mul]
exact (hF₀.pow_const _).mul <| Finset.measurable_prod _ fun _ _ ↦ hF₁.pow_const _
_ ≤ (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ p *
((∫⁻ t, f (X t) ∂μ i) ^ (1 - k * p)
* ∏ j ∈ s, (∫⁻ t, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) ∂μ i) ^ p) := by
-- apply Hölder's inequality
gcongr
apply ENNReal.lintegral_mul_prod_norm_pow_le
· exact hF₀.aemeasurable
· intros
exact hF₁.aemeasurable
· simp only [sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
ring
· exact hk'
· exact fun _ _ ↦ hp₀
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ p *
((∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ (1 - k * p) * ∏ j ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i, j}, f ∂μ) x ^ p) := by
-- absorb the newly-created integrals into `∫⋯∫`
congr! 2
· rw [lmarginal_singleton]
refine prod_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_
have hi' : i ∉ ({j} : Finset ι) := by
simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_compl] at hj ⊢
exact fun h ↦ hi (h ▸ hj)
rw [lmarginal_insert _ hf hi']
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ (p + (1 - k * p)) * ∏ j ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i, j}, f ∂μ) x ^ p := by
-- combine two `(∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s, f ∂μ) x` terms
rw [ENNReal.rpow_add_of_nonneg]
· ring
· exact hp₀
· exact hk'
_ ≤ (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ (1 - (s.card - 1 : ℝ) * p) *
∏ j ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) ∂μ) x ^ p := by
-- identify the result with the RHS integrand
congr! 2 with j hj
· ring
· congr! 1
rw [← lmarginal_union μ f hf]
· congr
rw [Finset.union_comm]
rfl
· rw [Finset.disjoint_singleton]
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_compl] at hj
exact fun h ↦ hi (h ▸ hj)
/-- Auxiliary result for the grid-lines lemma. Given a nonnegative function on a finitary product
type indexed by `ι`, and a set `s` in `ι`, consider partially integrating over the variables in
`sᶜ` and performing the "grid-lines operation" (see `GridLines.T`) to the resulting function in the
variables `s`. This theorem states that this operation decreases as the number of grid-lines taken
increases. -/
theorem T_lmarginal_antitone [Fintype ι] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
(hp₀ : 0 ≤ p) (hp : (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p ≤ 1) {f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
Antitone (fun s ↦ T μ p (∫⋯∫⁻_sᶜ, f ∂μ) s) := by
-- Reformulate (by induction): a function is decreasing on `Finset ι` if it decreases under the
-- insertion of any element to any set.
rw [Finset.antitone_iff_forall_insert_le]
intro s i hi
-- apply the lemma designed to encapsulate the inductive step
convert T_insert_le_T_lmarginal_singleton μ hp₀ s ?_ i hi (hf.lmarginal μ) using 2
· rw [← lmarginal_union μ f hf]
· rw [← insert_compl_insert hi]
rfl
rw [Finset.disjoint_singleton_left, not_mem_compl]
exact mem_insert_self i s
· -- the main nontrivial point is to check that an exponent `p` satisfying `0 ≤ p` and
-- `(#ι - 1) * p ≤ 1` is in the valid range for the inductive-step lemma
refine le_trans ?_ hp
gcongr
suffices (s.card : ℝ) + 1 ≤ #ι by linarith
rw [← card_add_card_compl s]
norm_cast
gcongr
have hi' : sᶜ.Nonempty := ⟨i, by rwa [Finset.mem_compl]⟩
rwa [← card_pos] at hi'
end GridLines
/-- The "grid-lines lemma" (not a standard name), stated with a general parameter `p` as the
exponent. Compare with `lintegral_prod_lintegral_pow_le`.
For any finite dependent product `Π i : ι, A i` of sigma-finite measure spaces, for any
nonnegative real number `p` such that `(#ι - 1) * p ≤ 1`, for any function `f` from `Π i, A i` into
the extended nonnegative reals, we consider an associated "grid-lines quantity", the integral of an
associated function from `Π i, A i` into the extended nonnegative reals. The value of this function
at `x : Π i, A i` is obtained by multiplying a certain power of `f` with the product, for each
co-ordinate `i`, of a certain power of the integral of `f` along the "grid line" in the `i`
direction through `x`.
This lemma bounds the Lebesgue integral of the grid-lines quantity by a power of the Lebesgue
integral of `f`. -/
theorem lintegral_mul_prod_lintegral_pow_le
[Fintype ι] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] {p : ℝ} (hp₀ : 0 ≤ p)
(hp : (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p ≤ 1) {f : (∀ i : ι, A i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, f x ^ (1 - (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p) * ∏ i, (∫⁻ xᵢ, f (update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i) ^ p ∂.pi μ
≤ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂.pi μ) ^ (1 + p) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty (∀ i, A i)
· simp_rw [lintegral_of_isEmpty]; refine zero_le _
inhabit ∀ i, A i
have H : (∅ : Finset ι) ≤ Finset.univ := Finset.empty_subset _
simpa [lmarginal_univ] using GridLines.T_lmarginal_antitone μ hp₀ hp hf H default
/-- Special case of the grid-lines lemma `lintegral_mul_prod_lintegral_pow_le`, taking the extremal
exponent `p = (#ι - 1)⁻¹`. -/
theorem lintegral_prod_lintegral_pow_le [Fintype ι] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
{p : ℝ} (hp : Real.HolderConjugate #ι p)
{f} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, ∏ i, (∫⁻ xᵢ, f (update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i) ^ ((1 : ℝ) / (#ι - 1 : ℝ)) ∂.pi μ
≤ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂.pi μ) ^ p := by
have : Nontrivial ι :=
Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.mp (by exact_mod_cast hp.lt)
have h0 : (1 : ℝ) < #ι := by norm_cast; exact Fintype.one_lt_card
have h1 : (0 : ℝ) < #ι - 1 := by linarith
have h2 : 0 ≤ ((1 : ℝ) / (#ι - 1 : ℝ)) := by positivity
have h3 : (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * ((1 : ℝ) / (#ι - 1 : ℝ)) ≤ 1 := by field_simp
have h4 : p = 1 + 1 / (↑#ι - 1) := by field_simp; rw [mul_comm, hp.sub_one_mul_conj]
rw [h4]
convert lintegral_mul_prod_lintegral_pow_le μ h2 h3 hf using 2
field_simp
end DecidableEq
/-! ## The Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality -/
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
/-- The **Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality**. Let `u` be a continuously differentiable
compactly-supported function `u` on `ℝⁿ`, for `n ≥ 2`. (More literally we encode `ℝⁿ` as
`ι → ℝ` where `n := #ι` is finite and at least 2.) Then the Lebesgue integral of the pointwise
expression `|u x| ^ (n / (n - 1))` is bounded above by the `n / (n - 1)`-th power of the Lebesgue
integral of the Fréchet derivative of `u`.
For a basis-free version, see `lintegral_pow_le_pow_lintegral_fderiv`. -/
theorem lintegral_pow_le_pow_lintegral_fderiv_aux [Fintype ι]
{p : ℝ} (hp : Real.HolderConjugate #ι p)
{u : (ι → ℝ) → F} (hu : ContDiff ℝ 1 u)
(h2u : HasCompactSupport u) :
∫⁻ x, ‖u x‖ₑ ^ p ≤ (∫⁻ x, ‖fderiv ℝ u x‖ₑ) ^ p := by
classical
/- For a function `f` in one variable and `t ∈ ℝ` we have
`|f(t)| = `|∫_{-∞}^t Df(s)∂s| ≤ ∫_ℝ |Df(s)| ∂s` where we use the fundamental theorem of calculus.
For each `x ∈ ℝⁿ` we let `u` vary in one of the `n` coordinates and apply the inequality above.
By taking the product over these `n` factors, raising them to the power `(n-1)⁻¹` and integrating,
we get the inequality `∫ |u| ^ (n/(n-1)) ≤ ∫ x, ∏ i, (∫ xᵢ, |Du(update x i xᵢ)|)^(n-1)⁻¹`.
The result then follows from the grid-lines lemma. -/
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ ↑#ι - 1 := by
have hι : (2 : ℝ) ≤ #ι := by exact_mod_cast hp.lt
linarith
calc ∫⁻ x, ‖u x‖ₑ ^ p
= ∫⁻ x, (‖u x‖ₑ ^ (1 / (#ι - 1 : ℝ))) ^ (#ι : ℝ) := by
-- a little algebraic manipulation of the exponent
congr! 2 with x
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, hp.conjugate_eq]
field_simp
_ = ∫⁻ x, ∏ _i : ι, ‖u x‖ₑ ^ (1 / (#ι - 1 : ℝ)) := by
-- express the left-hand integrand as a product of identical factors
congr! 2 with x
simp_rw [prod_const]
norm_cast
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, ∏ i, (∫⁻ xᵢ, ‖fderiv ℝ u (update x i xᵢ)‖ₑ) ^ ((1 : ℝ) / (#ι - 1 : ℝ)) := ?_
_ ≤ (∫⁻ x, ‖fderiv ℝ u x‖ₑ) ^ p := by
-- apply the grid-lines lemma
apply lintegral_prod_lintegral_pow_le _ hp
have : Continuous (fderiv ℝ u) := hu.continuous_fderiv le_rfl
fun_prop
-- we estimate |u x| using the fundamental theorem of calculus.
gcongr with x i
calc ‖u x‖ₑ
_ ≤ ∫⁻ xᵢ in Iic (x i), ‖deriv (u ∘ update x i) xᵢ‖ₑ := by
apply le_trans (by simp) (HasCompactSupport.enorm_le_lintegral_Ici_deriv _ _ _)
· exact hu.comp (by convert contDiff_update 1 x i)
· exact h2u.comp_isClosedEmbedding (isClosedEmbedding_update x i)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ xᵢ, ‖fderiv ℝ u (update x i xᵢ)‖ₑ := ?_
gcongr
· exact Measure.restrict_le_self
intro y
dsimp
-- bound the derivative which appears
calc ‖deriv (u ∘ update x i) y‖ₑ = ‖fderiv ℝ u (update x i y) (deriv (update x i) y)‖ₑ := by
rw [fderiv_comp_deriv _ (hu.differentiable le_rfl).differentiableAt
(hasDerivAt_update x i y).differentiableAt]
_ ≤ ‖fderiv ℝ u (update x i y)‖ₑ * ‖deriv (update x i) y‖ₑ := ContinuousLinearMap.le_opENorm _ _
_ ≤ ‖fderiv ℝ u (update x i y)‖ₑ := by simp [deriv_update, Pi.enorm_single]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
open Module
/-- The constant factor occurring in the conclusion of `lintegral_pow_le_pow_lintegral_fderiv`.
It only depends on `E`, `μ` and `p`.
It is determined by the ratio of the measures on `E` and `ℝⁿ` and
the operator norm of a chosen equivalence `E ≃ ℝⁿ` (raised to suitable powers involving `p`). -/
irreducible_def lintegralPowLePowLIntegralFDerivConst (p : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 := by
let ι := Fin (finrank ℝ E)
have : finrank ℝ E = finrank ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by
rw [finrank_fintype_fun_eq_card, Fintype.card_fin (finrank ℝ E)]
let e : E ≃L[ℝ] ι → ℝ := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq this
let c := addHaarScalarFactor μ ((volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)).map e.symm)
exact (c * ‖(e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ ^ p) * (c ^ p)⁻¹
/-- The **Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality**. Let `u` be a continuously differentiable
compactly-supported function `u` on a normed space `E` of finite dimension `n ≥ 2`, equipped
with Haar measure. Then the Lebesgue integral of the pointwise expression
`|u x| ^ (n / (n - 1))` is bounded above by a constant times the `n / (n - 1)`-th power of the
Lebesgue integral of the Fréchet derivative of `u`. -/
theorem lintegral_pow_le_pow_lintegral_fderiv {u : E → F}
(hu : ContDiff ℝ 1 u) (h2u : HasCompactSupport u)
{p : ℝ} (hp : Real.HolderConjugate (finrank ℝ E) p) :
∫⁻ x, ‖u x‖ₑ ^ p ∂μ ≤
lintegralPowLePowLIntegralFDerivConst μ p * (∫⁻ x, ‖fderiv ℝ u x‖ₑ ∂μ) ^ p := by
/- We reduce to the case where `E` is `ℝⁿ`, for which we have already proved the result using
an explicit basis in `MeasureTheory.lintegral_pow_le_pow_lintegral_fderiv_aux`.
This proof is not too hard, but takes quite some steps, reasoning about the equivalence
`e : E ≃ ℝⁿ`, relating the measures on each sides of the equivalence,
and estimating the derivative using the chain rule. -/
set C := lintegralPowLePowLIntegralFDerivConst μ p
let ι := Fin (finrank ℝ E)
have hιcard : #ι = finrank ℝ E := Fintype.card_fin (finrank ℝ E)
have : finrank ℝ E = finrank ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by simp [hιcard]
let e : E ≃L[ℝ] ι → ℝ := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq this
have : IsAddHaarMeasure ((volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)).map e.symm) :=
(e.symm : (ι → ℝ) ≃+ E).isAddHaarMeasure_map _ e.symm.continuous e.symm.symm.continuous
have hp : Real.HolderConjugate #ι p := by rwa [hιcard]
have h0p : 0 ≤ p := hp.symm.nonneg
let c := addHaarScalarFactor μ ((volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)).map e.symm)
have hc : 0 < c := addHaarScalarFactor_pos_of_isAddHaarMeasure ..
have h2c : μ = c • ((volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)).map e.symm) := isAddLeftInvariant_eq_smul ..
have h3c : (c : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simp_rw [ne_eq, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, hc.ne', not_false_eq_true]
have h0C : C = (c * ‖(e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ ^ p) * (c ^ p)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [c, ι, C, e, lintegralPowLePowLIntegralFDerivConst]
have hC : C * c ^ p = c * ‖(e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ ^ p := by
rw [h0C, inv_mul_cancel_right₀ (NNReal.rpow_pos hc).ne']
simp only [h2c, ENNReal.smul_def, lintegral_smul_measure, smul_eq_mul]
let v : (ι → ℝ) → F := u ∘ e.symm
have hv : ContDiff ℝ 1 v := hu.comp e.symm.contDiff
have h2v : HasCompactSupport v := h2u.comp_homeomorph e.symm.toHomeomorph
have :=
calc ∫⁻ x, ‖u x‖ₑ ^ p ∂(volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)).map e.symm
= ∫⁻ y, ‖v y‖ₑ ^ p := by
refine lintegral_map ?_ e.symm.continuous.measurable
borelize F
exact hu.continuous.measurable.nnnorm.coe_nnreal_ennreal.pow_const _
_ ≤ (∫⁻ y, ‖fderiv ℝ v y‖ₑ) ^ p := lintegral_pow_le_pow_lintegral_fderiv_aux hp hv h2v
_ = (∫⁻ y, ‖(fderiv ℝ u (e.symm y)).comp (fderiv ℝ e.symm y)‖ₑ) ^ p := by
congr! with y
apply fderiv_comp _ (hu.differentiable le_rfl _)
exact e.symm.differentiableAt
_ ≤ (∫⁻ y, ‖fderiv ℝ u (e.symm y)‖ₑ * ‖(e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →L[ℝ] E)‖ₑ) ^ p := by
gcongr with y
rw [e.symm.fderiv]
apply ContinuousLinearMap.opENorm_comp_le
_ = (‖(e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →L[ℝ] E)‖ₑ * ∫⁻ y, ‖fderiv ℝ u (e.symm y)‖ₑ) ^ p := by
rw [lintegral_mul_const, mul_comm]
refine (Continuous.nnnorm ?_).measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal
exact (hu.continuous_fderiv le_rfl).comp e.symm.continuous
_ = (‖(e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ ^ p : ℝ≥0) * (∫⁻ y, ‖fderiv ℝ u (e.symm y)‖ₑ) ^ p := by
rw [ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ h0p, enorm_eq_nnnorm, ← ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ h0p]
_ = (‖(e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ ^ p : ℝ≥0)
* (∫⁻ x, ‖fderiv ℝ u x‖ₑ ∂(volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)).map e.symm) ^ p := by
congr
rw [lintegral_map _ e.symm.continuous.measurable]
have : Continuous (fderiv ℝ u) := hu.continuous_fderiv le_rfl
fun_prop
rw [← ENNReal.mul_le_mul_left h3c ENNReal.coe_ne_top, ← mul_assoc, ← ENNReal.coe_mul, ← hC,
ENNReal.coe_mul] at this
rw [ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ h0p, ← mul_assoc, ← ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hc.ne']
exact this
/-- The constant factor occurring in the conclusion of `eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_one`.
| It only depends on `E`, `μ` and `p`. -/
irreducible_def eLpNormLESNormFDerivOneConst (p : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
lintegralPowLePowLIntegralFDerivConst μ p ^ p⁻¹
/-- The **Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality**. Let `u` be a continuously differentiable
compactly-supported function `u` on a normed space `E` of finite dimension `n ≥ 2`, equipped
with Haar measure. Then the `Lᵖ` norm of `u`, where `p := n / (n - 1)`, is bounded above by
a constant times the `L¹` norm of the Fréchet derivative of `u`. -/
theorem eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_one {u : E → F} (hu : ContDiff ℝ 1 u) (h2u : HasCompactSupport u)
{p : ℝ≥0} (hp : NNReal.HolderConjugate (finrank ℝ E) p) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/FunctionalSpaces/SobolevInequality.lean | 436 | 445 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Balance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.CStarAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# `RCLike`: a typeclass for ℝ or ℂ
This file defines the typeclass `RCLike` intended to have only two instances:
ℝ and ℂ. It is meant for definitions and theorems which hold for both the real and the complex case,
and in particular when the real case follows directly from the complex case by setting `re` to `id`,
`im` to zero and so on. Its API follows closely that of ℂ.
Applications include defining inner products and Hilbert spaces for both the real and
complex case. One typically produces the definitions and proof for an arbitrary field of this
typeclass, which basically amounts to doing the complex case, and the two cases then fall out
immediately from the two instances of the class.
The instance for `ℝ` is registered in this file.
The instance for `ℂ` is declared in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean`.
## Implementation notes
The coercion from reals into an `RCLike` field is done by registering `RCLike.ofReal` as
a `CoeTC`. For this to work, we must proceed carefully to avoid problems involving circular
coercions in the case `K=ℝ`; in particular, we cannot use the plain `Coe` and must set
priorities carefully. This problem was already solved for `ℕ`, and we copy the solution detailed
in `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean`. See also Note [coercion into rings] for more details.
In addition, several lemmas need to be set at priority 900 to make sure that they do not override
their counterparts in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean` (which causes linter errors).
A few lemmas requiring heavier imports are in `Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Lemmas.lean`.
-/
open Fintype
open scoped BigOperators ComplexConjugate
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
/--
This typeclass captures properties shared by ℝ and ℂ, with an API that closely matches that of ℂ.
-/
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
/-- The real part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
re : K →+ ℝ
/-- The imaginary part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
im : K →+ ℝ
/-- Imaginary unit in `K`. Meant to be set to `0` for `K = ℝ`. -/
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
/-- only an instance in the `ComplexOrder` locale -/
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
/-- Coercion from `ℝ` to an `RCLike` field. -/
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
/- The priority must be set at 900 to ensure that coercions are tried in the right order.
See Note [coercion into rings], or `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Basic.lean` for more details. -/
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
rfl
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem re_add_im (z : K) : (re z : K) + im z * I = z :=
RCLike.re_add_im_ax z
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_re : ∀ r : ℝ, re (r : K) = r :=
RCLike.ofReal_re_ax
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_im : ∀ r : ℝ, im (r : K) = 0 :=
RCLike.ofReal_im_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w :=
RCLike.mul_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w :=
RCLike.mul_im_ax
theorem ext_iff {z w : K} : z = w ↔ re z = re w ∧ im z = im w :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => re_add_im z ▸ re_add_im w ▸ h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
theorem ext {z w : K} (hre : re z = re w) (him : im z = im w) : z = w :=
ext_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : K) = 0 :=
algebraMap.coe_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem zero_re' : re (0 : K) = (0 : ℝ) :=
map_zero re
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : K) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap ℝ K)
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_re : re (1 : K) = 1 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_im : im (1 : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_im]
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → K) :=
(algebraMap ℝ K).injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : K) = (w : K) ↔ z = w :=
algebraMap.coe_inj
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_re`
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_im`
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
algebraMap.lift_map_eq_zero_iff x
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
ofReal_eq_zero.not
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : K) = r + s :=
algebraMap.coe_add _ _
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofReal_ofNat`
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : K) = -r :=
algebraMap.coe_neg r
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : K) = r - s :=
map_sub (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_sum {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.sum fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.sum fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppSum (algebraMap ℝ K) f g
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : K) = r * s :=
algebraMap.coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_prod (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsuppProd {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.prod fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.prod fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppProd _ f g
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias ofReal_finsupp_prod := ofReal_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem real_smul_ofReal (r x : ℝ) : r • (x : K) = (r : K) * (x : K) :=
real_smul_eq_coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (↑r * z) = r * re z := by
simp only [mul_re, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, sub_zero]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (↑r * z) = r * im z := by
simp only [add_zero, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_im]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_re (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (r • z) = r * re z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_im (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (r • z) = r * im z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_ofReal (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : K)‖ = |r| :=
norm_algebraMap' K r
/-! ### Characteristic zero -/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- ℝ and ℂ are both of characteristic zero. -/
instance (priority := 100) charZero_rclike : CharZero K :=
(RingHom.charZero_iff (algebraMap ℝ K).injective).1 inferInstance
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_expect {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_expect (algebraMap ..) ..
@[norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) (i : ι) :
((balance f i : ℝ) : K) = balance ((↑) ∘ f) i := map_balance (algebraMap ..) ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) :
ofReal ∘ balance f = balance (ofReal ∘ f : ι → K) := funext <| ofReal_balance _
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
/-- The imaginary unit. -/
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_re : re (I : K) = 0 :=
I_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im (z : K) : im z * im (I : K) = im z :=
mul_im_I_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im' (z : K) : im (I : K) * im z = im z := by rw [mul_comm, I_im]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem I_mul_re (z : K) : re (I * z) = -im z := by
simp only [I_re, zero_sub, I_im', zero_mul, mul_re]
theorem I_mul_I : (I : K) = 0 ∨ (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax
variable (𝕜) in
lemma I_eq_zero_or_im_I_eq_one : (I : K) = 0 ∨ im (I : K) = 1 :=
I_mul_I (K := K) |>.imp_right fun h ↦ by simpa [h] using (I_mul_re (I : K)).symm
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_re (z : K) : re (conj z) = re z :=
RCLike.conj_re_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_im (z : K) : im (conj z) = -im z :=
RCLike.conj_im_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_I : conj (I : K) = -I :=
RCLike.conj_I_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_ofReal (r : ℝ) : conj (r : K) = (r : K) := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp only [ofReal_im, conj_im, eq_self_iff_true, conj_re, and_self_iff, neg_zero]
-- replaced by `RCLike.conj_ofNat`
theorem conj_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : conj (n : K) = n := map_natCast _ _
theorem conj_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : conj (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
map_ofNat _ _
@[rclike_simps, simp]
theorem conj_neg_I : conj (-I) = (I : K) := by rw [map_neg, conj_I, neg_neg]
theorem conj_eq_re_sub_im (z : K) : conj z = re z - im z * I :=
(congr_arg conj (re_add_im z).symm).trans <| by
rw [map_add, map_mul, conj_I, conj_ofReal, conj_ofReal, mul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem sub_conj (z : K) : z - conj z = 2 * im z * I :=
calc
z - conj z = re z + im z * I - (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, ← conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * im z * I := by rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, mul_assoc]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem conj_smul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : conj (r • z) = r • conj z := by
rw [conj_eq_re_sub_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im, smul_re, smul_im, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul,
real_smul_eq_coe_mul r (_ - _), mul_sub, mul_assoc]
theorem add_conj (z : K) : z + conj z = 2 * re z :=
calc
z + conj z = re z + im z * I + (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * re z := by rw [add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
theorem re_eq_add_conj (z : K) : ↑(re z) = (z + conj z) / 2 := by
rw [add_conj, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (re z : K) two_ne_zero]
theorem im_eq_conj_sub (z : K) : ↑(im z) = I * (conj z - z) / 2 := by
rw [← neg_inj, ← ofReal_neg, ← I_mul_re, re_eq_add_conj, map_mul, conj_I, ← neg_div, ← mul_neg,
neg_sub, mul_sub, neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
open List in
/-- There are several equivalent ways to say that a number `z` is in fact a real number. -/
theorem is_real_TFAE (z : K) : TFAE [conj z = z, ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z, ↑(re z) = z, im z = 0] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [← @ofReal_inj K, im_eq_conj_sub, h, sub_self, mul_zero, zero_div,
ofReal_zero]
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
conv_rhs => rw [← re_add_im z, h, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := fun h => ⟨_, h⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun ⟨r, hr⟩ => hr ▸ conj_ofReal _
tfae_finish
theorem conj_eq_iff_real {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, z = (r : K) :=
calc
_ ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z := (is_real_TFAE z).out 0 1
_ ↔ _ := by simp only [eq_comm]
theorem conj_eq_iff_re {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ (re z : K) = z :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 2
theorem conj_eq_iff_im {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ im z = 0 :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 3
@[simp]
theorem star_def : (Star.star : K → K) = conj :=
rfl
variable (K)
/-- Conjugation as a ring equivalence. This is used to convert the inner product into a
sesquilinear product. -/
abbrev conjToRingEquiv : K ≃+* Kᵐᵒᵖ :=
starRingEquiv
variable {K} {z : K}
/-- The norm squared function. -/
def normSq : K →*₀ ℝ where
toFun z := re z * re z + im z * im z
map_zero' := by simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
map_one' := by simp only [one_im, add_zero, mul_one, one_re, mul_zero]
map_mul' z w := by
simp only [mul_im, mul_re]
ring
theorem normSq_apply (z : K) : normSq z = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
rfl
theorem norm_sq_eq_def {z : K} : ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z
theorem normSq_eq_def' (z : K) : normSq z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
norm_sq_eq_def.symm
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_zero : normSq (0 : K) = 0 :=
normSq.map_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_one : normSq (1 : K) = 1 :=
normSq.map_one
theorem normSq_nonneg (z : K) : 0 ≤ normSq z :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_eq_zero {z : K} : normSq z = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
map_eq_zero _
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_pos {z : K} : 0 < normSq z ↔ z ≠ 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, eq_comm]; simp [normSq_nonneg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_neg (z : K) : normSq (-z) = normSq z := by simp only [normSq_eq_def', norm_neg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_conj (z : K) : normSq (conj z) = normSq z := by
simp only [normSq_apply, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_mul (z w : K) : normSq (z * w) = normSq z * normSq w :=
map_mul _ z w
theorem normSq_add (z w : K) : normSq (z + w) = normSq z + normSq w + 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_apply, map_add, rclike_simps]
ring
theorem re_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : re z * re z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_right (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem im_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : im z * im z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem mul_conj (z : K) : z * conj z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
apply ext <;> simp [← ofReal_pow, norm_sq_eq_def, mul_comm]
theorem conj_mul (z : K) : conj z * z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_comm, mul_conj]
lemma inv_eq_conj (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z⁻¹ = conj z :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left <| by simp_rw [conj_mul, hz, algebraMap.coe_one, one_pow]
theorem normSq_sub (z w : K) : normSq (z - w) = normSq z + normSq w - 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_add, sub_eq_add_neg, map_neg, mul_neg, normSq_neg, map_neg]
theorem sqrt_normSq_eq_norm {z : K} : √(normSq z) = ‖z‖ := by
rw [normSq_eq_def', Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
/-! ### Inversion -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inv (r : ℝ) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ) : K) = (r : K)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ _ r
theorem inv_def (z : K) : z⁻¹ = conj z * ((‖z‖ ^ 2)⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· apply inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_conj, ofReal_inv, ofReal_pow, mul_inv_cancel₀]
simpa
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_re (z : K) : re z⁻¹ = re z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, re_ofReal_mul, conj_re, div_eq_inv_mul]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_im (z : K) : im z⁻¹ = -im z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, im_ofReal_mul, conj_im, div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem div_re (z w : K) : re (z / w) = re z * re w / normSq w + im z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
theorem div_im (z w : K) : im (z / w) = im z * re w / normSq w - re z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, neg_mul, mul_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem conj_inv (x : K) : conj x⁻¹ = (conj x)⁻¹ :=
star_inv₀ _
lemma conj_div (x y : K) : conj (x / y) = conj x / conj y := map_div' conj conj_inv _ _
--TODO: Do we rather want the map as an explicit definition?
lemma exists_norm_eq_mul_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ ↑‖x‖ = c * x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨‖x‖ / x, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
lemma exists_norm_mul_eq_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ c * ‖x‖ = x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨x / ‖x‖, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_div (r s : ℝ) : ((r / s : ℝ) : K) = r / s :=
map_div₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
theorem div_re_ofReal {z : K} {r : ℝ} : re (z / r) = re z / r := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_inv_mul, ← ofReal_inv, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zpow (r : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_zpow₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
theorem I_mul_I_of_nonzero : (I : K) ≠ 0 → (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax.resolve_left
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_I : (I : K)⁻¹ = -I := by
by_cases h : (I : K) = 0
· simp [h]
· field_simp [I_mul_I_of_nonzero h]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem div_I (z : K) : z / I = -(z * I) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_inv (z : K) : normSq z⁻¹ = (normSq z)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ normSq z
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_div (z w : K) : normSq (z / w) = normSq z / normSq w :=
map_div₀ normSq z w
@[simp 1100, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp only [← sqrt_normSq_eq_norm, normSq_conj]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma nnnorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖₊ = ‖z‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma enorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ₑ = ‖z‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
instance (priority := 100) : CStarRing K where
norm_mul_self_le x := le_of_eq <| ((norm_mul _ _).trans <| congr_arg (· * ‖x‖) (norm_conj _)).symm
instance : StarModule ℝ K where
star_smul r a := by
apply RCLike.ext <;> simp [RCLike.smul_re, RCLike.smul_im]
/-! ### Cast lemmas -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_natCast (algebraMap ℝ K) n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ((q : ℝ) : K) = q := map_nnratCast (algebraMap ℝ K) _
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_im]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : re (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
natCast_re n
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : im (ofNat(n) : K) = 0 :=
natCast_im n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ((ofNat(n) : ℝ) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
ofReal_natCast n
theorem ofNat_mul_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
re (ofNat(n) * z) = ofNat(n) * re z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, re_ofReal_mul]
theorem ofNat_mul_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
im (ofNat(n) * z) = ofNat(n) * im z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_intCast (n : ℤ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_intCast _ n
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_im]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ratCast (n : ℚ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_ratCast _ n
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem ratCast_re (q : ℚ) : re (q : K) = q := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ratCast_im (q : ℚ) : im (q : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_im]
/-! ### Norm -/
theorem norm_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : ‖(r : K)‖ = r :=
(norm_ofReal _).trans (abs_of_nonneg h)
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : K)‖ = n := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast]
exact norm_of_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg n)
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast] lemma nnnorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : K)‖₊ = n := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ‖(ofNat(n) : K)‖ = ofNat(n) :=
norm_natCast n
@[simp, rclike_simps]
lemma nnnorm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ‖(ofNat(n) : K)‖₊ = ofNat(n) :=
nnnorm_natCast n
lemma norm_two : ‖(2 : K)‖ = 2 := norm_ofNat 2
lemma nnnorm_two : ‖(2 : K)‖₊ = 2 := nnnorm_ofNat 2
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma norm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : K)‖ = q := by
rw [← ofReal_nnratCast]; exact norm_of_nonneg q.cast_nonneg
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma nnnorm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : K)‖₊ = q := by simp [nnnorm]
variable (K) in
lemma norm_nsmul [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E] (n : ℕ) (x : E) : ‖n • x‖ = n • ‖x‖ := by
simpa [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul] using norm_smul (n : K) x
variable (K) in
lemma nnnorm_nsmul [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E] (n : ℕ) (x : E) :
‖n • x‖₊ = n • ‖x‖₊ := by simpa [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul] using nnnorm_smul (n : K) x
section NormedField
variable [NormedField E] [CharZero E] [NormedSpace K E]
include K
variable (K) in
lemma norm_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (x : E) : ‖q • x‖ = q • ‖x‖ := by
simpa [NNRat.cast_smul_eq_nnqsmul] using norm_smul (q : K) x
variable (K) in
lemma nnnorm_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (x : E) : ‖q • x‖₊ = q • ‖x‖₊ := by
simpa [NNRat.cast_smul_eq_nnqsmul] using nnnorm_smul (q : K) x
@[bound]
lemma norm_expect_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → E} : ‖𝔼 i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ 𝔼 i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ :=
Finset.le_expect_of_subadditive norm_zero norm_add_le fun _ _ ↦ by rw [norm_nnqsmul K]
end NormedField
theorem mul_self_norm (z : K) : ‖z‖ * ‖z‖ = normSq z := by rw [normSq_eq_def', sq]
attribute [rclike_simps] norm_zero norm_one norm_eq_zero abs_norm norm_inv norm_div
theorem abs_re_le_norm (z : K) : |re z| ≤ ‖z‖ := by
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), abs_mul_abs_self, mul_self_norm]
apply re_sq_le_normSq
theorem abs_im_le_norm (z : K) : |im z| ≤ ‖z‖ := by
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), abs_mul_abs_self, mul_self_norm]
apply im_sq_le_normSq
theorem norm_re_le_norm (z : K) : ‖re z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ :=
abs_re_le_norm z
theorem norm_im_le_norm (z : K) : ‖im z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ :=
abs_im_le_norm z
theorem re_le_norm (z : K) : re z ≤ ‖z‖ :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_re_le_norm z)).2
theorem im_le_norm (z : K) : im z ≤ ‖z‖ :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_le_norm _)).2
theorem im_eq_zero_of_le {a : K} (h : ‖a‖ ≤ re a) : im a = 0 := by
simpa only [mul_self_norm a, normSq_apply, left_eq_add, mul_self_eq_zero]
using congr_arg (fun z => z * z) ((re_le_norm a).antisymm h)
theorem re_eq_self_of_le {a : K} (h : ‖a‖ ≤ re a) : (re a : K) = a := by
rw [← conj_eq_iff_re, conj_eq_iff_im, im_eq_zero_of_le h]
open IsAbsoluteValue
theorem abs_re_div_norm_le_one (z : K) : |re z / ‖z‖| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_re_le_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem abs_im_div_norm_le_one (z : K) : |im z / ‖z‖| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_im_le_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem norm_I_of_ne_zero (hI : (I : K) ≠ 0) : ‖(I : K)‖ = 1 := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg I) zero_le_one, one_mul, ← norm_mul,
I_mul_I_of_nonzero hI, norm_neg, norm_one]
theorem re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (x : K) : re (x * conj x) = ‖x * conj x‖ := by
rw [mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow]; simp [-map_pow]
theorem norm_sq_re_add_conj (x : K) : ‖x + conj x‖ ^ 2 = re (x + conj x) ^ 2 := by
rw [add_conj, ← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_mul, norm_ofReal, sq_abs, ofReal_re]
theorem norm_sq_re_conj_add (x : K) : ‖conj x + x‖ ^ 2 = re (conj x + x) ^ 2 := by
rw [add_comm, norm_sq_re_add_conj]
/-! ### Cauchy sequences -/
theorem isCauSeq_re (f : CauSeq K norm) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => re (f n) := fun _ ε0 =>
(f.cauchy ε0).imp fun i H j ij =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (by simpa only [map_sub] using abs_re_le_norm (f j - f i)) (H _ ij)
theorem isCauSeq_im (f : CauSeq K norm) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => im (f n) := fun _ ε0 =>
(f.cauchy ε0).imp fun i H j ij =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (by simpa only [map_sub] using abs_im_le_norm (f j - f i)) (H _ ij)
/-- The real part of a K Cauchy sequence, as a real Cauchy sequence. -/
noncomputable def cauSeqRe (f : CauSeq K norm) : CauSeq ℝ abs :=
⟨_, isCauSeq_re f⟩
/-- The imaginary part of a K Cauchy sequence, as a real Cauchy sequence. -/
noncomputable def cauSeqIm (f : CauSeq K norm) : CauSeq ℝ abs :=
⟨_, isCauSeq_im f⟩
theorem isCauSeq_norm {f : ℕ → K} (hf : IsCauSeq norm f) : IsCauSeq abs (norm ∘ f) := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf ε ε0
⟨i, fun j hj => lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_norm_sub_norm_le _ _) (hi j hj)⟩
end RCLike
section Instances
noncomputable instance Real.instRCLike : RCLike ℝ where
re := AddMonoidHom.id ℝ
im := 0
I := 0
I_re_ax := by simp only [AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
I_mul_I_ax := Or.intro_left _ rfl
re_add_im_ax z := by
simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, RingHom.id_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
ofReal_re_ax _ := rfl
ofReal_im_ax _ := rfl
mul_re_ax z w := by simp only [sub_zero, mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
mul_im_ax z w := by simp only [add_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
conj_re_ax z := by simp only [starRingEnd_apply, star_id_of_comm]
conj_im_ax _ := by simp only [neg_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
conj_I_ax := by simp only [RingHom.map_zero, neg_zero]
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z := by simp only [sq, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← abs_mul, abs_mul_self z, add_zero,
mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
mul_im_I_ax _ := by simp only [mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
le_iff_re_im := (and_iff_left rfl).symm
end Instances
namespace RCLike
section Order
open scoped ComplexOrder
variable {z w : K}
theorem lt_iff_re_im : z < w ↔ re z < re w ∧ im z = im w := by
simp_rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, @RCLike.le_iff_re_im K]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hr, hi⟩, heq⟩
exact ⟨⟨hr, mt (fun hreq => ext hreq hi) heq⟩, hi⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨hr, hrn⟩, hi⟩
exact ⟨⟨hr, hi⟩, ne_of_apply_ne _ hrn⟩
theorem nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero, eq_comm] using le_iff_re_im (z := 0) (w := z)
theorem pos_iff : 0 < z ↔ 0 < re z ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero, eq_comm] using lt_iff_re_im (z := 0) (w := z)
theorem nonpos_iff : z ≤ 0 ↔ re z ≤ 0 ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero] using le_iff_re_im (z := z) (w := 0)
theorem neg_iff : z < 0 ↔ re z < 0 ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero] using lt_iff_re_im (z := z) (w := 0)
lemma nonneg_iff_exists_ofReal : 0 ≤ z ↔ ∃ x ≥ (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
simp_rw [nonneg_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
lemma pos_iff_exists_ofReal : 0 < z ↔ ∃ x > (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
simp_rw [pos_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
lemma nonpos_iff_exists_ofReal : z ≤ 0 ↔ ∃ x ≤ (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
simp_rw [nonpos_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
lemma neg_iff_exists_ofReal : z < 0 ↔ ∃ x < (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
| simp_rw [neg_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 783 | 784 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace
/-! # The Mellin transform
We define the Mellin transform of a locally integrable function on `Ioi 0`, and show it is
differentiable in a suitable vertical strip.
## Main statements
- `mellin` : the Mellin transform `∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (s - 1) • f t`,
where `s` is a complex number.
- `HasMellin`: shorthand asserting that the Mellin transform exists and has a given value
(analogous to `HasSum`).
- `mellin_differentiableAt_of_isBigO_rpow` : if `f` is `O(x ^ (-a))` at infinity, and
`O(x ^ (-b))` at 0, then `mellin f` is holomorphic on the domain `b < re s < a`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter Asymptotics TopologicalSpace
open Real
open Complex hiding exp log abs_of_nonneg
open scoped Topology
noncomputable section
section Defs
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
/-- Predicate on `f` and `s` asserting that the Mellin integral is well-defined. -/
def MellinConvergent (f : ℝ → E) (s : ℂ) : Prop :=
IntegrableOn (fun t : ℝ => (t : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) • f t) (Ioi 0)
theorem MellinConvergent.const_smul {f : ℝ → E} {s : ℂ} (hf : MellinConvergent f s) {𝕜 : Type*}
[NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℂ 𝕜 E] (c : 𝕜) :
MellinConvergent (fun t => c • f t) s := by
simpa only [MellinConvergent, smul_comm] using hf.smul c
theorem MellinConvergent.cpow_smul {f : ℝ → E} {s a : ℂ} :
MellinConvergent (fun t => (t : ℂ) ^ a • f t) s ↔ MellinConvergent f (s + a) := by
refine integrableOn_congr_fun (fun t ht => ?_) measurableSet_Ioi
simp_rw [← sub_add_eq_add_sub, cpow_add _ _ (ofReal_ne_zero.2 <| ne_of_gt ht), mul_smul]
nonrec theorem MellinConvergent.div_const {f : ℝ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hf : MellinConvergent f s) (a : ℂ) :
MellinConvergent (fun t => f t / a) s := by
simpa only [MellinConvergent, smul_eq_mul, ← mul_div_assoc] using hf.div_const a
theorem MellinConvergent.comp_mul_left {f : ℝ → E} {s : ℂ} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) :
| MellinConvergent (fun t => f (a * t)) s ↔ MellinConvergent f s := by
have := integrableOn_Ioi_comp_mul_left_iff (fun t : ℝ => (t : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) • f t) 0 ha
rw [mul_zero] at this
| Mathlib/Analysis/MellinTransform.lean | 59 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Lex
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
/-!
# Variables of polynomials
This file establishes many results about the variable sets of a multivariate polynomial.
The *variable set* of a polynomial $P \in R[X]$ is a `Finset` containing each $x \in X$
that appears in a monomial in $P$.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.vars p` : the finset of variables occurring in `p`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `vars p = {x, y, z}`
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Vars
/-! ### `vars` -/
/-- `vars p` is the set of variables appearing in the polynomial `p` -/
def vars (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.degrees.toFinset
theorem vars_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.vars = p.degrees.toFinset := by
rw [vars]
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem vars_0 : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_zero, Multiset.toFinset_zero]
@[simp]
theorem vars_monomial (h : r ≠ 0) : (monomial s r).vars = s.support := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_monomial_eq _ _ h, Finsupp.toFinset_toMultiset]
@[simp]
theorem vars_C : (C r : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_C, Multiset.toFinset_zero]
@[simp]
theorem vars_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = {n} := by
rw [X, vars_monomial (one_ne_zero' R), Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ (one_ne_zero' ℕ)]
theorem mem_vars (i : σ) : i ∈ p.vars ↔ ∃ d ∈ p.support, i ∈ d.support := by
classical simp only [vars_def, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_degrees, mem_support_iff, exists_prop]
theorem mem_support_not_mem_vars_zero {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {x : σ →₀ ℕ} (H : x ∈ f.support)
{v : σ} (h : v ∉ vars f) : x v = 0 := by
contrapose! h
exact (mem_vars v).mpr ⟨x, H, Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mpr h⟩
theorem vars_add_subset [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p + q).vars ⊆ p.vars ∪ q.vars := by
intro x hx
simp only [vars_def, Finset.mem_union, Multiset.mem_toFinset] at hx ⊢
simpa using Multiset.mem_of_le degrees_add_le hx
theorem vars_add_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (h : Disjoint p.vars q.vars) :
(p + q).vars = p.vars ∪ q.vars := by
refine (vars_add_subset p q).antisymm fun x hx => ?_
simp only [vars_def, Multiset.disjoint_toFinset] at h hx ⊢
rwa [degrees_add_of_disjoint h, Multiset.toFinset_union]
section Mul
theorem vars_mul [DecidableEq σ] (φ ψ : MvPolynomial σ R) : (φ * ψ).vars ⊆ φ.vars ∪ ψ.vars := by
simp_rw [vars_def, ← Multiset.toFinset_add, Multiset.toFinset_subset]
exact Multiset.subset_of_le degrees_mul_le
@[simp]
theorem vars_one : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ :=
vars_C
theorem vars_pow (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ) : (φ ^ n).vars ⊆ φ.vars := by
classical
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ']
apply Finset.Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
exact Finset.union_subset (Finset.Subset.refl _) ih
/-- The variables of the product of a family of polynomials
are a subset of the union of the sets of variables of each polynomial.
-/
theorem vars_prod {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset ι} (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).vars ⊆ s.biUnion fun i => (f i).vars := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hs hsub =>
simp only [hs, Finset.biUnion_insert, Finset.prod_insert, not_false_iff]
apply Finset.Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
exact Finset.union_subset_union (Finset.Subset.refl _) hsub
section IsDomain
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [NoZeroDivisors A]
theorem vars_C_mul (a : A) (ha : a ≠ 0) (φ : MvPolynomial σ A) :
(C a * φ : MvPolynomial σ A).vars = φ.vars := by
ext1 i
simp only [mem_vars, exists_prop, mem_support_iff]
apply exists_congr
intro d
apply and_congr _ Iff.rfl
rw [coeff_C_mul, mul_ne_zero_iff, eq_true ha, true_and]
end IsDomain
end Mul
section Sum
variable {ι : Type*} (t : Finset ι) (φ : ι → MvPolynomial σ R)
|
theorem vars_sum_subset [DecidableEq σ] :
(∑ i ∈ t, φ i).vars ⊆ Finset.biUnion t fun i => (φ i).vars := by
classical
induction t using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has hsum =>
rw [Finset.biUnion_insert, Finset.sum_insert has]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Variables.lean | 161 | 168 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Minpoly
/-!
# Roots of cyclotomic polynomials.
We gather results about roots of cyclotomic polynomials. In particular we show in
`Polynomial.cyclotomic_eq_minpoly` that `cyclotomic n R` is the minimal polynomial of a primitive
root of unity.
## Main results
* `IsPrimitiveRoot.isRoot_cyclotomic` : Any `n`-th primitive root of unity is a root of
`cyclotomic n R`.
* `isRoot_cyclotomic_iff` : if `NeZero (n : R)`, then `μ` is a root of `cyclotomic n R`
if and only if `μ` is a primitive root of unity.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_eq_minpoly` : `cyclotomic n ℤ` is the minimal polynomial of a primitive
`n`-th root of unity `μ`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic.irreducible` : `cyclotomic n ℤ` is irreducible.
## Implementation details
To prove `Polynomial.cyclotomic.irreducible`, the irreducibility of `cyclotomic n ℤ`, we show in
`Polynomial.cyclotomic_eq_minpoly` that `cyclotomic n ℤ` is the minimal polynomial of any `n`-th
primitive root of unity `μ : K`, where `K` is a field of characteristic `0`.
-/
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {n : ℕ}
theorem isRoot_of_unity_of_root_cyclotomic {ζ : R} {i : ℕ} (hi : i ∈ n.divisors)
(h : (cyclotomic i R).IsRoot ζ) : ζ ^ n = 1 := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· exact pow_zero _
have := congr_arg (eval ζ) (prod_cyclotomic_eq_X_pow_sub_one hn R).symm
rw [eval_sub, eval_pow, eval_X, eval_one] at this
convert eq_add_of_sub_eq' this
convert (add_zero (M := R) _).symm
apply eval_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval_eq_zero _ h
exact Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem _ hi
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain R]
theorem _root_.isRoot_of_unity_iff (h : 0 < n) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {ζ : R} :
ζ ^ n = 1 ↔ ∃ i ∈ n.divisors, (cyclotomic i R).IsRoot ζ := by
rw [← mem_nthRoots h, nthRoots, mem_roots <| X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero h _, C_1, ←
prod_cyclotomic_eq_X_pow_sub_one h, isRoot_prod]
/-- Any `n`-th primitive root of unity is a root of `cyclotomic n R`. -/
theorem _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.isRoot_cyclotomic (hpos : 0 < n) {μ : R} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot μ n) :
IsRoot (cyclotomic n R) μ := by
rw [← mem_roots (cyclotomic_ne_zero n R), cyclotomic_eq_prod_X_sub_primitiveRoots h,
roots_prod_X_sub_C, ← Finset.mem_def]
rwa [← mem_primitiveRoots hpos] at h
private theorem isRoot_cyclotomic_iff' {n : ℕ} {K : Type*} [Field K] {μ : K} [NeZero (n : K)] :
IsRoot (cyclotomic n K) μ ↔ IsPrimitiveRoot μ n := by
-- in this proof, `o` stands for `orderOf μ`
have hnpos : 0 < n := (NeZero.of_neZero_natCast K).out.bot_lt
refine ⟨fun hμ => ?_, IsPrimitiveRoot.isRoot_cyclotomic hnpos⟩
| have hμn : μ ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isRoot_of_unity_iff hnpos _]
exact ⟨n, n.mem_divisors_self hnpos.ne', hμ⟩
by_contra hnμ
have ho : 0 < orderOf μ := (isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.2 <| ⟨n, hnpos, hμn⟩).orderOf_pos
have := pow_orderOf_eq_one μ
rw [isRoot_of_unity_iff ho] at this
obtain ⟨i, hio, hiμ⟩ := this
replace hio := Nat.dvd_of_mem_divisors hio
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.not_iff] at hnμ
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one] at hμn
have key : i < n := (Nat.le_of_dvd ho hio).trans_lt ((Nat.le_of_dvd hnpos hμn).lt_of_ne hnμ)
have key' : i ∣ n := hio.trans hμn
rw [← Polynomial.dvd_iff_isRoot] at hμ hiμ
have hni : {i, n} ⊆ n.divisors := by simpa [Finset.insert_subset_iff, key'] using hnpos.ne'
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hiμ
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := hμ
have := prod_cyclotomic_eq_X_pow_sub_one hnpos K
rw [← Finset.prod_sdiff hni, Finset.prod_pair key.ne, hk, hj] at this
have hn := (X_pow_sub_one_separable_iff.mpr <| NeZero.natCast_ne n K).squarefree
rw [← this, Squarefree] at hn
specialize hn (X - C μ) ⟨(∏ x ∈ n.divisors \ {i, n}, cyclotomic x K) * k * j, by ring⟩
simp [Polynomial.isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero] at hn
theorem isRoot_cyclotomic_iff [NeZero (n : R)] {μ : R} :
IsRoot (cyclotomic n R) μ ↔ IsPrimitiveRoot μ n := by
have hf : Function.Injective _ := IsFractionRing.injective R (FractionRing R)
haveI : NeZero (n : FractionRing R) := NeZero.nat_of_injective hf
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Cyclotomic/Roots.lean | 70 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functor
/-!
# Preadditive monoidal categories
A monoidal category is `MonoidalPreadditive` if it is preadditive and tensor product of morphisms
is linear in both factors.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C] [MonoidalCategory C]
/-- A category is `MonoidalPreadditive` if tensoring is additive in both factors.
Note we don't `extend Preadditive C` here, as `Abelian C` already extends it,
and we'll need to have both typeclasses sometimes.
-/
class MonoidalPreadditive : Prop where
whiskerLeft_zero : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, X ◁ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = 0 := by aesop_cat
zero_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, (0 : Y ⟶ Z) ▷ X = 0 := by aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_add : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), X ◁ (f + g) = X ◁ f + X ◁ g := by aesop_cat
add_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), (f + g) ▷ X = f ▷ X + g ▷ X := by aesop_cat
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_zero MonoidalPreadditive.zero_whiskerRight
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight
variable {C}
variable [MonoidalPreadditive C]
namespace MonoidalPreadditive
-- The priority setting will not be needed when we replace `𝟙 X ⊗ f` by `X ◁ f`.
@[simp (low)]
theorem tensor_zero {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) : f ⊗ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = 0 := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
-- The priority setting will not be needed when we replace `f ⊗ 𝟙 X` by `f ▷ X`.
@[simp (low)]
theorem zero_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) : (0 : W ⟶ X) ⊗ f = 0 := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
theorem tensor_add {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g h : Y ⟶ Z) : f ⊗ (g + h) = f ⊗ g + f ⊗ h := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
theorem add_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f g : W ⟶ X) (h : Y ⟶ Z) : (f + g) ⊗ h = f ⊗ h + g ⊗ h := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
end MonoidalPreadditive
instance tensorLeft_additive (X : C) : (tensorLeft X).Additive where
instance tensorRight_additive (X : C) : (tensorRight X).Additive where
instance tensoringLeft_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringLeft C).obj X).Additive where
instance tensoringRight_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringRight C).obj X).Additive where
/-- A faithful additive monoidal functor to a monoidal preadditive category
ensures that the domain is monoidal preadditive. -/
theorem monoidalPreadditive_of_faithful {D} [Category D] [Preadditive D] [MonoidalCategory D]
(F : D ⥤ C) [F.Monoidal] [F.Faithful] [F.Additive] :
MonoidalPreadditive D :=
{ whiskerLeft_zero := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
simp [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerLeft]
zero_whiskerRight := by
intros
| apply F.map_injective
simp [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerRight]
whiskerLeft_add := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
simp only [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerLeft, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add,
Preadditive.add_comp, MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add]
add_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
simp only [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerRight, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add,
Preadditive.add_comp, MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight] }
theorem whiskerLeft_sum (P : C) {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) :
P ◁ ∑ j ∈ s, g j = ∑ j ∈ s, P ◁ g j :=
map_sum ((tensoringLeft C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem sum_whiskerRight {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) (P : C) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ▷ P = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ▷ P :=
map_sum ((tensoringRight C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Preadditive.lean | 82 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Module
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Order
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Field
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.RealVectorSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ProperSpace.Real
/-!
# Normed space structure on `ℂ`.
This file gathers basic facts of analytic nature on the complex numbers.
## Main results
This file registers `ℂ` as a normed field, expresses basic properties of the norm, and gives tools
on the real vector space structure of `ℂ`. Notably, it defines the following functions in the
namespace `Complex`.
|Name |Type |Description |
|------------------|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|`equivRealProdCLM`|ℂ ≃L[ℝ] ℝ × ℝ|The natural `ContinuousLinearEquiv` from `ℂ` to `ℝ × ℝ` |
|`reCLM` |ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ |Real part function as a `ContinuousLinearMap` |
|`imCLM` |ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ |Imaginary part function as a `ContinuousLinearMap` |
|`ofRealCLM` |ℝ →L[ℝ] ℂ |Embedding of the reals as a `ContinuousLinearMap` |
|`ofRealLI` |ℝ →ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ |Embedding of the reals as a `LinearIsometry` |
|`conjCLE` |ℂ ≃L[ℝ] ℂ |Complex conjugation as a `ContinuousLinearEquiv` |
|`conjLIE` |ℂ ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ |Complex conjugation as a `LinearIsometryEquiv` |
We also register the fact that `ℂ` is an `RCLike` field.
-/
assert_not_exists Absorbs
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
variable {z : ℂ}
open ComplexConjugate Topology Filter
instance : NormedField ℂ where
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
norm_mul := Complex.norm_mul
instance : DenselyNormedField ℂ where
lt_norm_lt r₁ r₂ h₀ hr :=
let ⟨x, h⟩ := exists_between hr
⟨x, by rwa [norm_real, Real.norm_of_nonneg (h₀.trans_lt h.1).le]⟩
instance {R : Type*} [NormedField R] [NormedAlgebra R ℝ] : NormedAlgebra R ℂ where
norm_smul_le r x := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul ℝ r x, real_smul, norm_mul, norm_real, norm_algebraMap']
variable {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- The module structure from `Module.complexToReal` is a normed space. -/
instance (priority := 900) _root_.NormedSpace.complexToReal : NormedSpace ℝ E :=
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ ℂ E
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- The algebra structure from `Algebra.complexToReal` is a normed algebra. -/
instance (priority := 900) _root_.NormedAlgebra.complexToReal {A : Type*} [SeminormedRing A]
[NormedAlgebra ℂ A] : NormedAlgebra ℝ A :=
NormedAlgebra.restrictScalars ℝ ℂ A
-- This result cannot be moved to `Data/Complex/Norm` since `ℤ` gets its norm from its
-- normed ring structure and that file does not know about rings
@[simp 1100, norm_cast] lemma nnnorm_intCast (n : ℤ) : ‖(n : ℂ)‖₊ = ‖n‖₊ := by
ext; exact norm_intCast n
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias comap_abs_nhds_zero := comap_norm_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias continuous_abs := continuous_norm
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_normSq : Continuous normSq := by
simpa [← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq] using continuous_norm (E := ℂ).pow 2
theorem nnnorm_eq_one_of_pow_eq_one {ζ : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (h : ζ ^ n = 1) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ‖ζ‖₊ = 1 :=
(pow_left_inj₀ zero_le' zero_le' hn).1 <| by rw [← nnnorm_pow, h, nnnorm_one, one_pow]
theorem norm_eq_one_of_pow_eq_one {ζ : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (h : ζ ^ n = 1) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ‖ζ‖ = 1 :=
congr_arg Subtype.val (nnnorm_eq_one_of_pow_eq_one h hn)
lemma le_of_eq_sum_of_eq_sum_norm {ι : Type*} {a b : ℝ} (f : ι → ℂ) (s : Finset ι) (ha₀ : 0 ≤ a)
(ha : a = ∑ i ∈ s, f i) (hb : b = ∑ i ∈ s, (‖f i‖ : ℂ)) : a ≤ b := by
norm_cast at hb; rw [← Complex.norm_of_nonneg ha₀, ha, hb]; exact norm_sum_le s f
theorem equivRealProd_apply_le (z : ℂ) : ‖equivRealProd z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ := by
simp [Prod.norm_def, abs_re_le_norm, abs_im_le_norm]
theorem equivRealProd_apply_le' (z : ℂ) : ‖equivRealProd z‖ ≤ 1 * ‖z‖ := by
simpa using equivRealProd_apply_le z
theorem lipschitz_equivRealProd : LipschitzWith 1 equivRealProd := by
simpa using AddMonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound equivRealProdLm 1 equivRealProd_apply_le'
theorem antilipschitz_equivRealProd : AntilipschitzWith (NNReal.sqrt 2) equivRealProd :=
AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound equivRealProdLm fun z ↦ by
simpa only [Real.coe_sqrt, NNReal.coe_ofNat] using norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_max z
theorem isUniformEmbedding_equivRealProd : IsUniformEmbedding equivRealProd :=
antilipschitz_equivRealProd.isUniformEmbedding lipschitz_equivRealProd.uniformContinuous
instance : CompleteSpace ℂ :=
(completeSpace_congr isUniformEmbedding_equivRealProd).mpr inferInstance
instance instT2Space : T2Space ℂ := TopologicalSpace.t2Space_of_metrizableSpace
/-- The natural `ContinuousLinearEquiv` from `ℂ` to `ℝ × ℝ`. -/
@[simps! +simpRhs apply symm_apply_re symm_apply_im]
def equivRealProdCLM : ℂ ≃L[ℝ] ℝ × ℝ :=
equivRealProdLm.toContinuousLinearEquivOfBounds 1 (√2) equivRealProd_apply_le' fun p =>
norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_max (equivRealProd.symm p)
theorem equivRealProdCLM_symm_apply (p : ℝ × ℝ) :
Complex.equivRealProdCLM.symm p = p.1 + p.2 * Complex.I := Complex.equivRealProd_symm_apply p
instance : ProperSpace ℂ := lipschitz_equivRealProd.properSpace
equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph.isProperMap
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias tendsto_abs_cocompact_atTop :=
tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
/-- The `normSq` function on `ℂ` is proper. -/
theorem tendsto_normSq_cocompact_atTop : Tendsto normSq (cocompact ℂ) atTop := by
simpa [norm_mul_self_eq_normSq]
using tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop.atTop_mul_atTop₀ (tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop (E := ℂ))
open ContinuousLinearMap
/-- Continuous linear map version of the real part function, from `ℂ` to `ℝ`. -/
def reCLM : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ :=
reLm.mkContinuous 1 fun x => by simp [abs_re_le_norm]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_re : Continuous re :=
reCLM.continuous
lemma uniformlyContinuous_re : UniformContinuous re :=
reCLM.uniformContinuous
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-04")] alias uniformlyContinous_re := uniformlyContinuous_re
@[simp]
theorem reCLM_coe : (reCLM : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) = reLm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reCLM_apply (z : ℂ) : (reCLM : ℂ → ℝ) z = z.re :=
rfl
/-- Continuous linear map version of the imaginary part function, from `ℂ` to `ℝ`. -/
def imCLM : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ :=
imLm.mkContinuous 1 fun x => by simp [abs_im_le_norm]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_im : Continuous im :=
imCLM.continuous
lemma uniformlyContinuous_im : UniformContinuous im :=
imCLM.uniformContinuous
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-04")] alias uniformlyContinous_im := uniformlyContinuous_im
@[simp]
theorem imCLM_coe : (imCLM : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) = imLm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem imCLM_apply (z : ℂ) : (imCLM : ℂ → ℝ) z = z.im :=
rfl
theorem restrictScalars_one_smulRight' (x : E) :
ContinuousLinearMap.restrictScalars ℝ ((1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight x : ℂ →L[ℂ] E) =
reCLM.smulRight x + I • imCLM.smulRight x := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp [map_add, mk_eq_add_mul_I, mul_smul, smul_comm I b x]
theorem restrictScalars_one_smulRight (x : ℂ) :
ContinuousLinearMap.restrictScalars ℝ ((1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight x : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ) =
x • (1 : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ) := by
ext1 z
dsimp
apply mul_comm
/-- The complex-conjugation function from `ℂ` to itself is an isometric linear equivalence. -/
def conjLIE : ℂ ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ :=
⟨conjAe.toLinearEquiv, norm_conj⟩
@[simp]
theorem conjLIE_apply (z : ℂ) : conjLIE z = conj z :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem conjLIE_symm : conjLIE.symm = conjLIE :=
rfl
theorem isometry_conj : Isometry (conj : ℂ → ℂ) :=
conjLIE.isometry
@[simp]
theorem dist_conj_conj (z w : ℂ) : dist (conj z) (conj w) = dist z w :=
isometry_conj.dist_eq z w
@[simp]
theorem nndist_conj_conj (z w : ℂ) : nndist (conj z) (conj w) = nndist z w :=
isometry_conj.nndist_eq z w
theorem dist_conj_comm (z w : ℂ) : dist (conj z) w = dist z (conj w) := by
rw [← dist_conj_conj, conj_conj]
theorem nndist_conj_comm (z w : ℂ) : nndist (conj z) w = nndist z (conj w) :=
Subtype.ext <| dist_conj_comm _ _
instance : ContinuousStar ℂ :=
⟨conjLIE.continuous⟩
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_conj : Continuous (conj : ℂ → ℂ) :=
continuous_star
/-- The only continuous ring homomorphisms from `ℂ` to `ℂ` are the identity and the complex
conjugation. -/
theorem ringHom_eq_id_or_conj_of_continuous {f : ℂ →+* ℂ} (hf : Continuous f) :
f = RingHom.id ℂ ∨ f = conj := by
simpa only [DFunLike.ext_iff] using real_algHom_eq_id_or_conj (AlgHom.mk' f (map_real_smul f hf))
/-- Continuous linear equiv version of the conj function, from `ℂ` to `ℂ`. -/
def conjCLE : ℂ ≃L[ℝ] ℂ :=
conjLIE
@[simp]
theorem conjCLE_coe : conjCLE.toLinearEquiv = conjAe.toLinearEquiv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem conjCLE_apply (z : ℂ) : conjCLE z = conj z :=
rfl
/-- Linear isometry version of the canonical embedding of `ℝ` in `ℂ`. -/
def ofRealLI : ℝ →ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ :=
⟨ofRealAm.toLinearMap, norm_real⟩
theorem isometry_ofReal : Isometry ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) :=
ofRealLI.isometry
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_ofReal : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) :=
ofRealLI.continuous
theorem isUniformEmbedding_ofReal : IsUniformEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) :=
ofRealLI.isometry.isUniformEmbedding
lemma _root_.RCLike.isUniformEmbedding_ofReal {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] :
IsUniformEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ → 𝕜) :=
RCLike.ofRealLI.isometry.isUniformEmbedding
theorem _root_.Filter.tendsto_ofReal_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ} :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x : ℂ)) l (𝓝 (x : ℂ)) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
isUniformEmbedding_ofReal.isClosedEmbedding.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
lemma _root_.Filter.tendsto_ofReal_iff' {α 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
{l : Filter α} {f : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ} :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x : 𝕜)) l (𝓝 (x : 𝕜)) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
RCLike.isUniformEmbedding_ofReal.isClosedEmbedding.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
lemma _root_.Filter.Tendsto.ofReal {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x : ℂ)) l (𝓝 (x : ℂ)) :=
tendsto_ofReal_iff.mpr hf
/-- The only continuous ring homomorphism from `ℝ` to `ℂ` is the identity. -/
theorem ringHom_eq_ofReal_of_continuous {f : ℝ →+* ℂ} (h : Continuous f) : f = ofRealHom := by
convert congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom <| Subsingleton.elim (AlgHom.mk' f <| map_real_smul f h)
(Algebra.ofId ℝ ℂ)
/-- Continuous linear map version of the canonical embedding of `ℝ` in `ℂ`. -/
def ofRealCLM : ℝ →L[ℝ] ℂ :=
ofRealLI.toContinuousLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem ofRealCLM_coe : (ofRealCLM : ℝ →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ) = ofRealAm.toLinearMap :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofRealCLM_apply (x : ℝ) : ofRealCLM x = x :=
rfl
noncomputable instance : RCLike ℂ where
re := ⟨⟨Complex.re, Complex.zero_re⟩, Complex.add_re⟩
im := ⟨⟨Complex.im, Complex.zero_im⟩, Complex.add_im⟩
I := Complex.I
I_re_ax := I_re
I_mul_I_ax := .inr Complex.I_mul_I
re_add_im_ax := re_add_im
ofReal_re_ax := ofReal_re
ofReal_im_ax := ofReal_im
mul_re_ax := mul_re
mul_im_ax := mul_im
conj_re_ax _ := rfl
conj_im_ax _ := rfl
| conj_I_ax := conj_I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z := (normSq_eq_norm_sq z).symm
mul_im_I_ax _ := mul_one _
toPartialOrder := Complex.partialOrder
le_iff_re_im := Iff.rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean | 312 | 316 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Bounded.ArzelaAscoli
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Bounded.Normed
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Gluing
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# The Gromov-Hausdorff distance is realized
In this file, we construct of a good coupling between nonempty compact metric spaces, minimizing
their Hausdorff distance. This construction is instrumental to study the Gromov-Hausdorff
distance between nonempty compact metric spaces.
Given two nonempty compact metric spaces `X` and `Y`, we define `OptimalGHCoupling X Y` as a
compact metric space, together with two isometric embeddings `optimalGHInjl` and `optimalGHInjr`
respectively of `X` and `Y` into `OptimalGHCoupling X Y`. The main property of the optimal
coupling is that the Hausdorff distance between `X` and `Y` in `OptimalGHCoupling X Y` is smaller
than the corresponding distance in any other coupling. We do not prove completely this fact in this
file, but we show a good enough approximation of this fact in `hausdorffDist_optimal_le_HD`, that
will suffice to obtain the full statement once the Gromov-Hausdorff distance is properly defined,
in `hausdorffDist_optimal`.
The key point in the construction is that the set of possible distances coming from isometric
embeddings of `X` and `Y` in metric spaces is a set of equicontinuous functions. By Arzela-Ascoli,
it is compact, and one can find such a distance which is minimal. This distance defines a premetric
space structure on `X ⊕ Y`. The corresponding metric quotient is `OptimalGHCoupling X Y`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
open Topology NNReal Set Function TopologicalSpace Filter Metric Quotient BoundedContinuousFunction
open Sum (inl inr)
attribute [local instance] metricSpaceSum
namespace GromovHausdorff
section GromovHausdorffRealized
/-! This section shows that the Gromov-Hausdorff distance
is realized. For this, we consider candidate distances on the disjoint union
`X ⊕ Y` of two compact nonempty metric spaces, almost realizing the Gromov-Hausdorff
distance, and show that they form a compact family by applying Arzela-Ascoli
theorem. The existence of a minimizer follows. -/
section Definitions
variable (X : Type u) (Y : Type v) [MetricSpace X] [MetricSpace Y]
private abbrev ProdSpaceFun : Type _ :=
(X ⊕ Y) × (X ⊕ Y) → ℝ
private abbrev Cb : Type _ :=
BoundedContinuousFunction ((X ⊕ Y) × (X ⊕ Y)) ℝ
private def maxVar : ℝ≥0 :=
2 * ⟨diam (univ : Set X), diam_nonneg⟩ + 1 + 2 * ⟨diam (univ : Set Y), diam_nonneg⟩
private theorem one_le_maxVar : 1 ≤ maxVar X Y :=
calc
(1 : Real) = 2 * 0 + 1 + 2 * 0 := by simp
_ ≤ 2 * diam (univ : Set X) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : Set Y) := by gcongr <;> positivity
/-- The set of functions on `X ⊕ Y` that are candidates distances to realize the
minimum of the Hausdorff distances between `X` and `Y` in a coupling. -/
def candidates : Set (ProdSpaceFun X Y) :=
{ f | (((((∀ x y : X, f (Sum.inl x, Sum.inl y) = dist x y) ∧
∀ x y : Y, f (Sum.inr x, Sum.inr y) = dist x y) ∧
∀ x y, f (x, y) = f (y, x)) ∧
∀ x y z, f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z)) ∧
∀ x, f (x, x) = 0) ∧
∀ x y, f (x, y) ≤ maxVar X Y }
/-- Version of the set of candidates in bounded_continuous_functions, to apply Arzela-Ascoli. -/
private def candidatesB : Set (Cb X Y) :=
{ f : Cb X Y | (f : _ → ℝ) ∈ candidates X Y }
end Definitions
section Constructions
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} [MetricSpace X] [MetricSpace Y]
{f : ProdSpaceFun X Y} {x y z t : X ⊕ Y}
attribute [local instance 10] Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty'
private theorem maxVar_bound [CompactSpace X] [Nonempty X] [CompactSpace Y] [Nonempty Y] :
dist x y ≤ maxVar X Y :=
calc
dist x y ≤ diam (univ : Set (X ⊕ Y)) :=
dist_le_diam_of_mem isBounded_of_compactSpace (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _)
_ = diam (range inl ∪ range inr : Set (X ⊕ Y)) := by rw [range_inl_union_range_inr]
_ ≤ diam (range inl : Set (X ⊕ Y)) + dist (inl default) (inr default) +
diam (range inr : Set (X ⊕ Y)) :=
(diam_union (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _))
_ = diam (univ : Set X) + (dist (α := X) default default + 1 + dist (α := Y) default default) +
diam (univ : Set Y) := by
rw [isometry_inl.diam_range, isometry_inr.diam_range]
rfl
_ = 1 * diam (univ : Set X) + 1 + 1 * diam (univ : Set Y) := by simp
_ ≤ 2 * diam (univ : Set X) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : Set Y) := by gcongr <;> norm_num
private theorem candidates_symm (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) : f (x, y) = f (y, x) :=
fA.1.1.1.2 x y
private theorem candidates_triangle (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) : f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z) :=
fA.1.1.2 x y z
private theorem candidates_refl (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) : f (x, x) = 0 :=
fA.1.2 x
private theorem candidates_nonneg (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) : 0 ≤ f (x, y) := by
have : 0 ≤ 2 * f (x, y) :=
calc
0 = f (x, x) := (candidates_refl fA).symm
_ ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, x) := candidates_triangle fA
_ = f (x, y) + f (x, y) := by rw [candidates_symm fA]
_ = 2 * f (x, y) := by ring
linarith
private theorem candidates_dist_inl (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) (x y : X) :
f (inl x, inl y) = dist x y :=
fA.1.1.1.1.1 x y
private theorem candidates_dist_inr (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) (x y : Y) :
f (inr x, inr y) = dist x y :=
fA.1.1.1.1.2 x y
private theorem candidates_le_maxVar (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) : f (x, y) ≤ maxVar X Y :=
fA.2 x y
/-- candidates are bounded by `maxVar X Y` -/
private theorem candidates_dist_bound (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) :
∀ {x y : X ⊕ Y}, f (x, y) ≤ maxVar X Y * dist x y
| inl x, inl y =>
calc
f (inl x, inl y) = dist x y := candidates_dist_inl fA x y
_ = dist (α := X ⊕ Y) (inl x) (inl y) := by
rw [@Sum.dist_eq X Y]
rfl
_ = 1 * dist (α := X ⊕ Y) (inl x) (inl y) := by ring
_ ≤ maxVar X Y * dist (inl x) (inl y) := by gcongr; exact one_le_maxVar X Y
| inl x, inr y =>
calc
f (inl x, inr y) ≤ maxVar X Y := candidates_le_maxVar fA
_ = maxVar X Y * 1 := by simp
_ ≤ maxVar X Y * dist (inl x) (inr y) := by gcongr; apply Sum.one_le_dist_inl_inr
| inr x, inl y =>
calc
f (inr x, inl y) ≤ maxVar X Y := candidates_le_maxVar fA
_ = maxVar X Y * 1 := by simp
_ ≤ maxVar X Y * dist (inl x) (inr y) := by gcongr; apply Sum.one_le_dist_inl_inr
| inr x, inr y =>
calc
f (inr x, inr y) = dist x y := candidates_dist_inr fA x y
_ = dist (α := X ⊕ Y) (inr x) (inr y) := by
rw [@Sum.dist_eq X Y]
rfl
_ = 1 * dist (α := X ⊕ Y) (inr x) (inr y) := by ring
_ ≤ maxVar X Y * dist (inr x) (inr y) := by gcongr; exact one_le_maxVar X Y
/-- Technical lemma to prove that candidates are Lipschitz -/
private theorem candidates_lipschitz_aux (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) :
f (x, y) - f (z, t) ≤ 2 * maxVar X Y * dist (x, y) (z, t) :=
calc
f (x, y) - f (z, t) ≤ f (x, t) + f (t, y) - f (z, t) := by gcongr; exact candidates_triangle fA
_ ≤ f (x, z) + f (z, t) + f (t, y) - f (z, t) := by gcongr; exact candidates_triangle fA
_ = f (x, z) + f (t, y) := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
_ ≤ maxVar X Y * dist x z + maxVar X Y * dist t y := by
gcongr <;> apply candidates_dist_bound fA
_ ≤ maxVar X Y * max (dist x z) (dist t y) + maxVar X Y * max (dist x z) (dist t y) := by
gcongr
· apply le_max_left
· apply le_max_right
_ = 2 * maxVar X Y * max (dist x z) (dist y t) := by
rw [dist_comm t y]
ring
_ = 2 * maxVar X Y * dist (x, y) (z, t) := rfl
/-- Candidates are Lipschitz -/
private theorem candidates_lipschitz (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) :
LipschitzWith (2 * maxVar X Y) f := by
apply LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨z, t⟩
rw [Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff]
use candidates_lipschitz_aux fA
rw [dist_comm]
exact candidates_lipschitz_aux fA
/-- To apply Arzela-Ascoli, we need to check that the set of candidates is closed and
equicontinuous. Equicontinuity follows from the Lipschitz control, we check closedness. -/
private theorem closed_candidatesB : IsClosed (candidatesB X Y) := by
have I1 : ∀ x y, IsClosed { f : Cb X Y | f (inl x, inl y) = dist x y } := fun x y =>
isClosed_eq continuous_eval_const continuous_const
have I2 : ∀ x y, IsClosed { f : Cb X Y | f (inr x, inr y) = dist x y } := fun x y =>
isClosed_eq continuous_eval_const continuous_const
have I3 : ∀ x y, IsClosed { f : Cb X Y | f (x, y) = f (y, x) } := fun x y =>
isClosed_eq continuous_eval_const continuous_eval_const
have I4 : ∀ x y z, IsClosed { f : Cb X Y | f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z) } := fun x y z =>
isClosed_le continuous_eval_const (continuous_eval_const.add continuous_eval_const)
have I5 : ∀ x, IsClosed { f : Cb X Y | f (x, x) = 0 } := fun x =>
isClosed_eq continuous_eval_const continuous_const
have I6 : ∀ x y, IsClosed { f : Cb X Y | f (x, y) ≤ maxVar X Y } := fun x y =>
isClosed_le continuous_eval_const continuous_const
have : candidatesB X Y = (((((⋂ (x) (y), { f : Cb X Y | f (@inl X Y x, @inl X Y y) = dist x y }) ∩
⋂ (x) (y), { f : Cb X Y | f (@inr X Y x, @inr X Y y) = dist x y }) ∩
⋂ (x) (y), { f : Cb X Y | f (x, y) = f (y, x) }) ∩
⋂ (x) (y) (z), { f : Cb X Y | f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z) }) ∩
⋂ x, { f : Cb X Y | f (x, x) = 0 }) ∩
⋂ (x) (y), { f : Cb X Y | f (x, y) ≤ maxVar X Y } := by
ext
simp only [candidatesB, candidates, mem_inter_iff, mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq]
rw [this]
repeat'
first
|apply IsClosed.inter _ _
|apply isClosed_iInter _
|apply I1 _ _|apply I2 _ _|apply I3 _ _|apply I4 _ _ _|apply I5 _|apply I6 _ _|intro x
/-- We will then choose the candidate minimizing the Hausdorff distance. Except that we are not
in a metric space setting, so we need to define our custom version of Hausdorff distance,
called `HD`, and prove its basic properties. -/
def HD (f : Cb X Y) :=
max (⨆ x, ⨅ y, f (inl x, inr y)) (⨆ y, ⨅ x, f (inl x, inr y))
/- We will show that `HD` is continuous on `BoundedContinuousFunction`s, to deduce that its
minimum on the compact set `candidatesB` is attained. Since it is defined in terms of
infimum and supremum on `ℝ`, which is only conditionally complete, we will need all the time
to check that the defining sets are bounded below or above. This is done in the next few
technical lemmas. -/
theorem HD_below_aux1 {f : Cb X Y} (C : ℝ) {x : X} :
BddBelow (range fun y : Y => f (inl x, inr y) + C) :=
let ⟨cf, hcf⟩ := f.isBounded_range.bddBelow
⟨cf + C, forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => add_le_add_right ((fun x => hcf (mem_range_self x)) _) _⟩
private theorem HD_bound_aux1 [Nonempty Y] (f : Cb X Y) (C : ℝ) :
BddAbove (range fun x : X => ⨅ y, f (inl x, inr y) + C) := by
obtain ⟨Cf, hCf⟩ := f.isBounded_range.bddAbove
refine ⟨Cf + C, forall_mem_range.2 fun x => ?_⟩
calc
⨅ y, f (inl x, inr y) + C ≤ f (inl x, inr default) + C := ciInf_le (HD_below_aux1 C) default
_ ≤ Cf + C := add_le_add ((fun x => hCf (mem_range_self x)) _) le_rfl
theorem HD_below_aux2 {f : Cb X Y} (C : ℝ) {y : Y} :
BddBelow (range fun x : X => f (inl x, inr y) + C) :=
let ⟨cf, hcf⟩ := f.isBounded_range.bddBelow
⟨cf + C, forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => add_le_add_right ((fun x => hcf (mem_range_self x)) _) _⟩
private theorem HD_bound_aux2 [Nonempty X] (f : Cb X Y) (C : ℝ) :
BddAbove (range fun y : Y => ⨅ x, f (inl x, inr y) + C) := by
obtain ⟨Cf, hCf⟩ := f.isBounded_range.bddAbove
refine ⟨Cf + C, forall_mem_range.2 fun y => ?_⟩
calc
⨅ x, f (inl x, inr y) + C ≤ f (inl default, inr y) + C := ciInf_le (HD_below_aux2 C) default
_ ≤ Cf + C := add_le_add ((fun x => hCf (mem_range_self x)) _) le_rfl
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty X] [Nonempty Y]
/- To check that `HD` is continuous, we check that it is Lipschitz. As `HD` is a max, we
prove separately inequalities controlling the two terms (relying too heavily on copy-paste...) -/
private theorem HD_lipschitz_aux1 (f g : Cb X Y) :
(⨆ x, ⨅ y, f (inl x, inr y)) ≤ (⨆ x, ⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g := by
obtain ⟨cg, hcg⟩ := g.isBounded_range.bddBelow
have Hcg : ∀ x, cg ≤ g x := fun x => hcg (mem_range_self x)
obtain ⟨cf, hcf⟩ := f.isBounded_range.bddBelow
have Hcf : ∀ x, cf ≤ f x := fun x => hcf (mem_range_self x)
-- prove the inequality but with `dist f g` inside, by using inequalities comparing
-- iSup to iSup and iInf to iInf
have Z : (⨆ x, ⨅ y, f (inl x, inr y)) ≤ ⨆ x, ⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y) + dist f g :=
ciSup_mono (HD_bound_aux1 _ (dist f g)) fun x =>
ciInf_mono ⟨cf, forall_mem_range.2 fun i => Hcf _⟩ fun y => coe_le_coe_add_dist
-- move the `dist f g` out of the infimum and the supremum, arguing that continuous monotone maps
-- (here the addition of `dist f g`) preserve infimum and supremum
have E1 : ∀ x, (⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g = ⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y) + dist f g := by
intro x
refine Monotone.map_ciInf_of_continuousAt (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) ?_ ?_
· intro x y hx
simpa
· show BddBelow (range fun y : Y => g (inl x, inr y))
exact ⟨cg, forall_mem_range.2 fun i => Hcg _⟩
have E2 : (⨆ x, ⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g = ⨆ x, (⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g := by
refine Monotone.map_ciSup_of_continuousAt (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) ?_ ?_
· intro x y hx
simpa
· simpa using HD_bound_aux1 _ 0
-- deduce the result from the above two steps
simpa [E2, E1, Function.comp]
private theorem HD_lipschitz_aux2 (f g : Cb X Y) :
(⨆ y, ⨅ x, f (inl x, inr y)) ≤ (⨆ y, ⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g := by
obtain ⟨cg, hcg⟩ := g.isBounded_range.bddBelow
have Hcg : ∀ x, cg ≤ g x := fun x => hcg (mem_range_self x)
obtain ⟨cf, hcf⟩ := f.isBounded_range.bddBelow
have Hcf : ∀ x, cf ≤ f x := fun x => hcf (mem_range_self x)
-- prove the inequality but with `dist f g` inside, by using inequalities comparing
-- iSup to iSup and iInf to iInf
have Z : (⨆ y, ⨅ x, f (inl x, inr y)) ≤ ⨆ y, ⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y) + dist f g :=
ciSup_mono (HD_bound_aux2 _ (dist f g)) fun y =>
ciInf_mono ⟨cf, forall_mem_range.2 fun i => Hcf _⟩ fun y => coe_le_coe_add_dist
-- move the `dist f g` out of the infimum and the supremum, arguing that continuous monotone maps
-- (here the addition of `dist f g`) preserve infimum and supremum
have E1 : ∀ y, (⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g = ⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y) + dist f g := by
intro y
refine Monotone.map_ciInf_of_continuousAt (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) ?_ ?_
· intro x y hx
simpa
· show BddBelow (range fun x : X => g (inl x, inr y))
exact ⟨cg, forall_mem_range.2 fun i => Hcg _⟩
have E2 : (⨆ y, ⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g = ⨆ y, (⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g := by
refine Monotone.map_ciSup_of_continuousAt (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) ?_ ?_
· intro x y hx
simpa
· simpa using HD_bound_aux2 _ 0
| -- deduce the result from the above two steps
simpa [E2, E1]
private theorem HD_lipschitz_aux3 (f g : Cb X Y) :
HD f ≤ HD g + dist f g :=
max_le (le_trans (HD_lipschitz_aux1 f g) (add_le_add_right (le_max_left _ _) _))
(le_trans (HD_lipschitz_aux2 f g) (add_le_add_right (le_max_right _ _) _))
/-- Conclude that `HD`, being Lipschitz, is continuous -/
private theorem HD_continuous : Continuous (HD : Cb X Y → ℝ) :=
LipschitzWith.continuous (LipschitzWith.of_le_add HD_lipschitz_aux3)
end Nonempty
variable [CompactSpace X] [CompactSpace Y]
/-- Compactness of candidates (in `BoundedContinuousFunction`s) follows. -/
private theorem isCompact_candidatesB : IsCompact (candidatesB X Y) := by
refine arzela_ascoli₂
(Icc 0 (maxVar X Y) : Set ℝ) isCompact_Icc (candidatesB X Y) closed_candidatesB ?_ ?_
· rintro f ⟨x1, x2⟩ hf
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/GromovHausdorffRealized.lean | 323 | 343 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
/-!
# Power function on `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {x : ℝ≥0} {w y z : ℝ}
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) _ _
theorem rpow_add' (h : y + z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_add_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_sub_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg x.2 hy hz
/-- Variant of `NNReal.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) y z
theorem rpow_sub' (h : y - z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
lemma rpow_sub_one' (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
/-- `rpow` as a `MonoidHom` -/
@[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
/-- `rpow` variant of `List.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0` -/
theorem list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r :=
l.prod_hom (rpowMonoidHom r)
theorem list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← list_prod_map_rpow, List.map_map]; rfl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r :=
s.prod_hom' (rpowMonoidHom r) _
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma finset_prod_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
multiset_prod_map_rpow _ _ _
-- note: these don't really belong here, but they're much easier to prove in terms of the above
section Real
/-- `rpow` version of `List.prod_map_pow` for `Real`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r := by
lift l to List ℝ≥0 using hl
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.list_prod_map_rpow l r)
push_cast at this
rw [List.map_map] at this ⊢
exact mod_cast this
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l.map f) _ r, List.map_map]
· rfl
simpa using hl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r := by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with l
simpa using Real.list_prod_map_rpow' l f hs r
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.finset_prod_rpow
{ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow s.val f hs r
end Real
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^z < y := by
simp only [← not_le, rpow_inv_le_iff hz]
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z := by
simp only [← not_le, le_rpow_inv_iff hz]
section
variable {y : ℝ≥0}
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
end
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} (hx_pos : 0 < x) : 0 < x ^ p := by
have rpow_pos_of_nonneg : ∀ {p : ℝ}, 0 < p → 0 < x ^ p := by
intro p hp_pos
rw [← zero_rpow hp_pos.ne']
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) p with (hp_pos | rfl | hp_neg)
· exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hp_pos
· simp only [zero_lt_one, rpow_zero]
· rw [← neg_neg p, rpow_neg, inv_pos]
exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg (neg_pos.mpr hp_neg)
theorem rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one (coe_nonneg x) hx1 hz
theorem rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
theorem one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
theorem one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow h h₁
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z ≤ 0) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_le_self_of_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ x := by
rcases eq_bot_or_bot_lt x with (rfl | (h : 0 < x))
· have : z ≠ 0 := by linarith
simp [this]
nth_rw 2 [← NNReal.rpow_one x]
exact NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge h hx h_one_le
theorem rpow_left_injective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y z hyz => by simpa only [rpow_inv_rpow_self hx] using congr_arg (fun y => y ^ (1 / x)) hyz
theorem rpow_eq_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z = y ^ z ↔ x = y :=
(rpow_left_injective hz).eq_iff
theorem rpow_left_surjective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Surjective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y => ⟨y ^ x⁻¹, by simp_rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hx, rpow_one]⟩
theorem rpow_left_bijective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Bijective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
⟨rpow_left_injective hx, rpow_left_surjective hx⟩
theorem eq_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x = y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z = y := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
theorem rpow_inv_eq_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ = y ↔ x = y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, NNReal.coe_pow]
exact Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast x.2 hn
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, NNReal.coe_pow, coe_rpow]
exact Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow x.2 hn
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
Real.toNNReal (x ^ y) = Real.toNNReal x ^ y := by
nth_rw 1 [← Real.coe_toNNReal x hx]
rw [← NNReal.coe_rpow, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem strictMono_rpow_of_pos {z : ℝ} (h : 0 < z) : StrictMono fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
fun x y hxy => by simp only [NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow hxy h, coe_lt_coe]
theorem monotone_rpow_of_nonneg {z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ z) : Monotone fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
h.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h0 => h0 ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, monotone_const]) fun h0 =>
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos h0).monotone
/-- Bundles `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ y` into an order isomorphism when `y : ℝ` is positive,
where the inverse is `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ (1 / y)`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderIsoRpow (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) : ℝ≥0 ≃o ℝ≥0 :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hy).orderIsoOfRightInverse (fun x => x ^ y) (fun x => x ^ (1 / y))
fun x => by
dsimp
rw [← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hy.ne.symm, rpow_one]
theorem orderIsoRpow_symm_eq (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) :
(orderIsoRpow y hy).symm = orderIsoRpow (1 / y) (one_div_pos.2 hy) := by
simp only [orderIsoRpow, one_div_one_div]; rfl
theorem _root_.Real.nnnorm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ ^ y := by
ext; exact Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg hx
end NNReal
namespace ENNReal
/-- The real power function `x^y` on extended nonnegative reals, defined for `x : ℝ≥0∞` and
`y : ℝ` as the restriction of the real power function if `0 < x < ⊤`, and with the natural values
for `0` and `⊤` (i.e., `0 ^ x = 0` for `x > 0`, `1` for `x = 0` and `⊤` for `x < 0`, and
`⊤ ^ x = 1 / 0 ^ x`). -/
noncomputable def rpow : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ → ℝ≥0∞
| some x, y => if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0)
| none, y => if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by
cases x <;>
· dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem top_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by simp [top_rpow_def, h]
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
simp [top_rpow_def, asymm h, ne_of_lt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, asymm h, ne_of_gt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, ne_of_gt h]
theorem zero_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then 0 else if y = 0 then 1 else ⊤ := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) y with (H | rfl | H)
· simp [H, ne_of_gt, zero_rpow_of_pos, lt_irrefl]
· simp [lt_irrefl]
· simp [H, asymm H, ne_of_lt, zero_rpow_of_neg]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_mul_self (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y * (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
rw [zero_rpow_def]
split_ifs
exacts [zero_mul _, one_mul _, top_mul_top]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0} (h : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : (↑(x ^ y) : ℝ≥0∞) = x ^ y := by
rw [← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) : ↑(x ^ y) = (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with (H | H)
· simp [hx, H.symm]
· simp [hx, zero_rpow_of_pos H, NNReal.zero_rpow (ne_of_gt H)]
· exact coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx _
theorem coe_rpow_def (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else ↑(x ^ y) :=
rfl
theorem rpow_ofNNReal {M : ℝ≥0} {P : ℝ} (hP : 0 ≤ P) : (M : ℝ≥0∞) ^ P = ↑(M ^ P) := by
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hP, ← ENNReal.rpow_eq_pow]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by
cases x
· exact dif_pos zero_lt_one
· change ite _ _ _ = _
simp only [NNReal.rpow_one, some_eq_coe, ite_eq_right_iff, top_ne_coe, and_imp]
exact fun _ => zero_le_one.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [← coe_one, ← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero one_ne_zero]
simp
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ 0 < y ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y < 0 := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [hy, hy.not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = 0 ∧ y < 0 ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ 0 < y := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊤ := by
simp [rpow_eq_top_iff, hy, asymm hy]
lemma rpow_lt_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y < ∞ ↔ x < ∞ := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos hy]
theorem rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0∞) {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ y = ⊤ → x = ⊤ := by
rw [ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff]
rintro (h|h)
· exfalso
rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at h
exact h.right hy0
· exact h.left
theorem rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y ≠ ⊤ :=
mt (ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg x hy0) h
theorem rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y < ⊤ :=
| lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg hy0 h)
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 568 | 568 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Cubics and discriminants
This file defines cubic polynomials over a semiring and their discriminants over a splitting field.
## Main definitions
* `Cubic`: the structure representing a cubic polynomial.
* `Cubic.disc`: the discriminant of a cubic polynomial.
## Main statements
* `Cubic.disc_ne_zero_iff_roots_nodup`: the cubic discriminant is not equal to zero if and only if
the cubic has no duplicate roots.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_equation
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discriminant
## Tags
cubic, discriminant, polynomial, root
-/
noncomputable section
/-- The structure representing a cubic polynomial. -/
@[ext]
structure Cubic (R : Type*) where
/-- The degree-3 coefficient -/
a : R
/-- The degree-2 coefficient -/
b : R
/-- The degree-1 coefficient -/
c : R
/-- The degree-0 coefficient -/
d : R
namespace Cubic
open Polynomial
variable {R S F K : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨default, default, default, default⟩⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
section Basic
variable {P Q : Cubic R} {a b c d a' b' c' d' : R} [Semiring R]
/-- Convert a cubic polynomial to a polynomial. -/
def toPoly (P : Cubic R) : R[X] :=
C P.a * X ^ 3 + C P.b * X ^ 2 + C P.c * X + C P.d
theorem C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {w x y z : S} :
C w * (X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨w, w * -(x + y + z), w * (x * y + x * z + y * z), w * -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
simp only [toPoly, C_neg, C_add, C_mul]
ring1
theorem prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {x y z : S} :
(X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨1, -(x + y + z), x * y + x * z + y * z, -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
rw [← one_mul <| X - C x, ← C_1, C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq, one_mul, one_mul, one_mul]
/-! ### Coefficients -/
section Coeff
private theorem coeffs : (∀ n > 3, P.toPoly.coeff n = 0) ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a ∧
P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d := by
simp only [toPoly, coeff_add, coeff_C, coeff_C_mul_X, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
norm_num
intro n hn
repeat' rw [if_neg]
any_goals omega
repeat' rw [zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : 3 < n) : P.toPoly.coeff n = 0 :=
coeffs.1 n hn
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_a : P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a :=
coeffs.2.1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_b : P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b :=
coeffs.2.2.1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_c : P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c :=
coeffs.2.2.2.1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_d : P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d :=
coeffs.2.2.2.2
theorem a_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.a = Q.a := by rw [← coeff_eq_a, h, coeff_eq_a]
theorem b_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.b = Q.b := by rw [← coeff_eq_b, h, coeff_eq_b]
theorem c_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.c = Q.c := by rw [← coeff_eq_c, h, coeff_eq_c]
theorem d_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.d = Q.d := by rw [← coeff_eq_d, h, coeff_eq_d]
theorem toPoly_injective (P Q : Cubic R) : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly ↔ P = Q :=
⟨fun h ↦ Cubic.ext (a_of_eq h) (b_of_eq h) (c_of_eq h) (d_of_eq h), congr_arg toPoly⟩
theorem of_a_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.b * X ^ 2 + C P.c * X + C P.d := by
rw [toPoly, ha, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
theorem of_a_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩ = C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d :=
of_a_eq_zero rfl
theorem of_b_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.c * X + C P.d := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, hb, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
theorem of_b_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩ = C c * X + C d :=
of_b_eq_zero rfl rfl
theorem of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.d := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, hc, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
theorem of_c_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩ = C d :=
of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
theorem of_d_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d = 0) :
P.toPoly = 0 := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, hd, C_0]
theorem of_d_eq_zero' : (⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩ : Cubic R).toPoly = 0 :=
of_d_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl rfl
theorem zero : (0 : Cubic R).toPoly = 0 :=
of_d_eq_zero'
theorem toPoly_eq_zero_iff (P : Cubic R) : P.toPoly = 0 ↔ P = 0 := by
rw [← zero, toPoly_injective]
private theorem ne_zero (h0 : P.a ≠ 0 ∨ P.b ≠ 0 ∨ P.c ≠ 0 ∨ P.d ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h0
rw [(toPoly_eq_zero_iff P).mp h0]
exact ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp ne_zero).1 ha
theorem ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).1 hb
theorem ne_zero_of_c_ne_zero (hc : P.c ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).2).1 hc
theorem ne_zero_of_d_ne_zero (hd : P.d ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).2).2 hd
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.a :=
leadingCoeff_cubic ha
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero' (ha : a ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨a, b, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = a :=
leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero ha
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.b := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, leadingCoeff_quadratic hb]
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero' (hb : b ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = b :=
leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero rfl hb
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c ≠ 0) :
P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.c := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, leadingCoeff_linear hc]
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero' (hc : c ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = c :=
leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero rfl rfl hc
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) :
P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.d := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, leadingCoeff_C]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).leadingCoeff = d :=
leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
theorem monic_of_a_eq_one (ha : P.a = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero (ha ▸ one_ne_zero), ha]
theorem monic_of_a_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨1, b, c, d⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_a_eq_one rfl
theorem monic_of_b_eq_one (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero ha (hb ▸ one_ne_zero), hb]
theorem monic_of_b_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨0, 1, c, d⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_b_eq_one rfl rfl
| theorem monic_of_c_eq_one (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero ha hb (hc ▸ one_ne_zero), hc]
| Mathlib/Algebra/CubicDiscriminant.lean | 220 | 222 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Lemmas about linear ordered (semi)fields
-/
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [Semifield α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {a b c d e : α} {m n : ℤ}
/-!
### Relating two divisions.
-/
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ a ≤ b := div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c < b / c ↔ a < b := div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem div_lt_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b < a / c ↔ c < b :=
div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left ha hb hc
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ b :=
div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left ha hb hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d ↔ a * d < c * b :=
div_lt_div_iff₀ b0 d0
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b ≤ c / d ↔ a * d ≤ c * b :=
div_le_div_iff₀ b0 d0
@[deprecated div_le_div₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hac : a ≤ c) (hd : 0 < d) (hbd : d ≤ b) : a / b ≤ c / d :=
div_le_div₀ hc hac hd hbd
@[deprecated div_lt_div₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div (hac : a < c) (hbd : d ≤ b) (c0 : 0 ≤ c) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d :=
div_lt_div₀ hac hbd c0 d0
@[deprecated div_lt_div₀' (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div' (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : d < b) (c0 : 0 < c) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d :=
div_lt_div₀' hac hbd c0 d0
/-!
### Relating one division and involving `1`
-/
@[bound]
theorem div_le_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) : a / b ≤ a := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ha zero_lt_one hb
@[bound]
theorem div_lt_self (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 1 < b) : a / b < a := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_lt_div_of_pos_left ha zero_lt_one hb
@[bound]
theorem le_div_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb₀ : 0 < b) (hb₁ : b ≤ 1) : a ≤ a / b := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ha hb₀ hb₁
theorem one_le_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ a := by rw [le_div_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem div_le_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [div_le_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem one_lt_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 < a / b ↔ b < a := by rw [lt_div_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem div_lt_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 1 ↔ a < b := by rw [div_lt_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem one_div_le (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ b ↔ 1 / b ≤ a := by
simpa using inv_le_comm₀ ha hb
theorem one_div_lt (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < b ↔ 1 / b < a := by
simpa using inv_lt_comm₀ ha hb
theorem le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using le_inv_comm₀ ha hb
theorem lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a < 1 / b ↔ b < 1 / a := by
simpa using lt_inv_comm₀ ha hb
@[bound] lemma Bound.one_lt_div_of_pos_of_lt (b0 : 0 < b) : b < a → 1 < a / b := (one_lt_div b0).mpr
@[bound] lemma Bound.div_lt_one_of_pos_of_lt (b0 : 0 < b) : a < b → a / b < 1 := (div_lt_one b0).mpr
/-!
### Relating two divisions, involving `1`
-/
theorem one_div_le_one_div_of_le (ha : 0 < a) (h : a ≤ b) : 1 / b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using inv_anti₀ ha h
theorem one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt (ha : 0 < a) (h : a < b) : 1 / b < 1 / a := by
rwa [lt_div_iff₀' ha, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_lt_one (ha.trans h)]
theorem le_of_one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b) : b ≤ a :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt ha) h
theorem lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a < 1 / b) : b < a :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_le ha) h
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_le_one_div_of_le` and
`le_of_one_div_le_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ a :=
div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left zero_lt_one ha hb
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt` and
`lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < 1 / b ↔ b < a :=
div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left zero_lt_one ha hb
theorem one_lt_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a < 1) : 1 < 1 / a := by
rwa [lt_one_div (@zero_lt_one α _ _ _ _ _) h1, one_div_one]
theorem one_le_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a ≤ 1) : 1 ≤ 1 / a := by
rwa [le_one_div (@zero_lt_one α _ _ _ _ _) h1, one_div_one]
/-!
### Results about halving.
The equalities also hold in semifields of characteristic `0`.
-/
theorem half_pos (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / 2 :=
div_pos h zero_lt_two
theorem one_half_pos : (0 : α) < 1 / 2 :=
half_pos zero_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem half_le_self_iff : a / 2 ≤ a ↔ 0 ≤ a := by
rw [div_le_iff₀ (zero_lt_two' α), mul_two, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
@[simp]
theorem half_lt_self_iff : a / 2 < a ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [div_lt_iff₀ (zero_lt_two' α), mul_two, lt_add_iff_pos_left]
alias ⟨_, half_le_self⟩ := half_le_self_iff
alias ⟨_, half_lt_self⟩ := half_lt_self_iff
alias div_two_lt_of_pos := half_lt_self
theorem one_half_lt_one : (1 / 2 : α) < 1 :=
half_lt_self zero_lt_one
theorem two_inv_lt_one : (2⁻¹ : α) < 1 :=
(one_div _).symm.trans_lt one_half_lt_one
theorem left_lt_add_div_two : a < (a + b) / 2 ↔ a < b := by simp [lt_div_iff₀, mul_two]
theorem add_div_two_lt_right : (a + b) / 2 < b ↔ a < b := by simp [div_lt_iff₀, mul_two]
theorem add_thirds (a : α) : a / 3 + a / 3 + a / 3 = a := by
rw [div_add_div_same, div_add_div_same, ← two_mul, ← add_one_mul 2 a, two_add_one_eq_three,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ a three_ne_zero]
/-!
### Miscellaneous lemmas
-/
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff_of_pos_left (ha : 0 < a) : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pos_iff_of_pos_left ha, inv_pos]
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff_of_pos_right (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right (inv_pos.2 hb)]
theorem mul_le_mul_of_mul_div_le (h : a * (b / c) ≤ d) (hc : 0 < c) : b * a ≤ d * c := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc] at h
rwa [mul_comm b, ← div_le_iff₀ hc]
theorem div_mul_le_div_mul_of_div_le_div (h : a / b ≤ c / d) (he : 0 ≤ e) :
a / (b * e) ≤ c / (d * e) := by
rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_nonneg.2 he)
theorem exists_pos_mul_lt {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b * c < a := by
have : 0 < a / max (b + 1) 1 := div_pos h (lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inr zero_lt_one))
refine ⟨a / max (b + 1) 1, this, ?_⟩
rw [← lt_div_iff₀ this, div_div_cancel₀ h.ne']
exact lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl <| lt_add_one _)
theorem exists_pos_lt_mul {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b < c * a :=
let ⟨c, hc₀, hc⟩ := exists_pos_mul_lt h b;
⟨c⁻¹, inv_pos.2 hc₀, by rwa [← div_eq_inv_mul, lt_div_iff₀ hc₀]⟩
lemma monotone_div_right_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) : Monotone (· / a) :=
fun _b _c hbc ↦ div_le_div_of_nonneg_right hbc ha
lemma strictMono_div_right_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) : StrictMono (· / a) :=
fun _b _c hbc ↦ div_lt_div_of_pos_right hbc ha
theorem Monotone.div_const {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) {c : α}
(hc : 0 ≤ c) : Monotone fun x => f x / c := (monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).comp hf
theorem StrictMono.div_const {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : StrictMono f) {c : α}
(hc : 0 < c) : StrictMono fun x => f x / c := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul_const (inv_pos.2 hc)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedSemiField.toDenselyOrdered : DenselyOrdered α where
dense a₁ a₂ h :=
⟨(a₁ + a₂) / 2,
calc
a₁ = (a₁ + a₁) / 2 := (add_self_div_two a₁).symm
_ < (a₁ + a₂) / 2 := div_lt_div_of_pos_right (add_lt_add_left h _) zero_lt_two
,
calc
(a₁ + a₂) / 2 < (a₂ + a₂) / 2 := div_lt_div_of_pos_right (add_lt_add_right h _) zero_lt_two
_ = a₂ := add_self_div_two a₂
⟩
theorem min_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : min (a / c) (b / c) = min a b / c :=
(monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).map_min.symm
theorem max_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : max (a / c) (b / c) = max a b / c :=
(monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).map_max.symm
theorem one_div_strictAntiOn : StrictAntiOn (fun x : α => 1 / x) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ x1 _ y1 xy => (one_div_lt_one_div (Set.mem_Ioi.mp y1) (Set.mem_Ioi.mp x1)).mpr xy
theorem one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) :
1 / a ^ n ≤ 1 / a ^ m := by
refine (one_div_le_one_div ?_ ?_).mpr (pow_right_mono₀ a1 mn) <;>
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans_le a1) _
theorem one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) :
1 / a ^ n < 1 / a ^ m := by
refine (one_div_lt_one_div ?_ ?_).2 (pow_lt_pow_right₀ a1 mn) <;>
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans a1) _
theorem one_div_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : Antitone fun n : ℕ => 1 / a ^ n := fun _ _ =>
one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1
theorem one_div_pow_strictAnti (a1 : 1 < a) : StrictAnti fun n : ℕ => 1 / a ^ n := fun _ _ =>
one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1
theorem inv_strictAntiOn : StrictAntiOn (fun x : α => x⁻¹) (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ hy xy =>
(inv_lt_inv₀ hy hx).2 xy
theorem inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) : (a ^ n)⁻¹ ≤ (a ^ m)⁻¹ := by
convert one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1 mn using 1 <;> simp
theorem inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) : (a ^ n)⁻¹ < (a ^ m)⁻¹ := by
convert one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1 mn using 1 <;> simp
theorem inv_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : Antitone fun n : ℕ => (a ^ n)⁻¹ := fun _ _ =>
inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le a1
theorem inv_pow_strictAnti (a1 : 1 < a) : StrictAnti fun n : ℕ => (a ^ n)⁻¹ := fun _ _ =>
inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt a1
theorem le_iff_forall_one_lt_le_mul₀ {α : Type*}
[Semifield α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
{a b : α} (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ≤ b ↔ ∀ ε, 1 < ε → a ≤ b * ε := by
refine ⟨fun h _ hε ↦ h.trans <| le_mul_of_one_le_right hb hε.le, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
obtain rfl|hb := hb.eq_or_lt
· simp_rw [zero_mul] at h
exact h 2 one_lt_two
refine le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun x hbx => ?_
convert h (x / b) ((one_lt_div hb).mpr hbx)
rw [mul_div_cancel₀ _ hb.ne']
/-! ### Results about `IsGLB` -/
theorem IsGLB.mul_left {s : Set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB ((fun b => a * b) '' s) (a * b) := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le ha with (ha | rfl)
· exact (OrderIso.mulLeft₀ _ ha).isGLB_image'.2 hs
· simp_rw [zero_mul]
rw [hs.nonempty.image_const]
exact isGLB_singleton
theorem IsGLB.mul_right {s : Set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB ((fun b => b * a) '' s) (b * a) := by simpa [mul_comm] using hs.mul_left ha
end LinearOrderedSemifield
section
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {a b c d : α} {n : ℤ}
/-! ### Lemmas about pos, nonneg, nonpos, neg -/
theorem div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∨ a < 0 ∧ b < 0 := by
simp only [division_def, mul_pos_iff, inv_pos, inv_lt_zero]
theorem div_neg_iff : a / b < 0 ↔ 0 < a ∧ b < 0 ∨ a < 0 ∧ 0 < b := by
simp [division_def, mul_neg_iff]
theorem div_nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ a / b ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ 0 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 0 ∧ b ≤ 0 := by
simp [division_def, mul_nonneg_iff]
theorem div_nonpos_iff : a / b ≤ 0 ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ b ≤ 0 ∨ a ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ b := by
simp [division_def, mul_nonpos_iff]
theorem div_nonneg_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) : 0 ≤ a / b :=
div_nonneg_iff.2 <| Or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem div_pos_of_neg_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 0 < a / b :=
div_pos_iff.2 <| Or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (ha : a < 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 0 :=
div_neg_iff.2 <| Or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem div_neg_of_pos_of_neg (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a / b < 0 :=
div_neg_iff.2 <| Or.inl ⟨ha, hb⟩
/-! ### Relating one division with another term -/
theorem div_le_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : b / c ≤ a ↔ a * c ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => div_mul_cancel₀ b (ne_of_lt hc) ▸ mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right h hc.le, fun h =>
calc
a = a * c * (1 / c) := mul_mul_div a (ne_of_lt hc)
_ ≥ b * (1 / c) := mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right h (one_div_neg.2 hc).le
_ = b / c := (div_eq_mul_one_div b c).symm
⟩
theorem div_le_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : b / c ≤ a ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
rw [mul_comm, div_le_iff_of_neg hc]
theorem le_div_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ b ≤ a * c := by
rw [← neg_neg c, mul_neg, div_neg, le_neg, div_le_iff₀ (neg_pos.2 hc), neg_mul]
theorem le_div_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ b ≤ c * a := by
rw [mul_comm, le_div_iff_of_neg hc]
theorem div_lt_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : b / c < a ↔ a * c < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div_iff_of_neg hc
theorem div_lt_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : b / c < a ↔ c * a < b := by
rw [mul_comm, div_lt_iff_of_neg hc]
theorem lt_div_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a < b / c ↔ b < a * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| div_le_iff_of_neg hc
theorem lt_div_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : a < b / c ↔ b < c * a := by
rw [mul_comm, lt_div_iff_of_neg hc]
theorem div_le_one_of_ge (h : b ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a / b ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [neg_div_neg_eq] using div_le_one_of_le₀ (neg_le_neg h) (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos hb)
/-! ### Bi-implications of inequalities using inversions -/
theorem inv_le_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← one_div, div_le_iff_of_neg ha, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_le_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
theorem inv_le_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a := by
rw [← inv_le_inv_of_neg hb (inv_lt_zero.2 ha), inv_inv]
theorem le_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ := by
rw [← inv_le_inv_of_neg (inv_lt_zero.2 hb) ha, inv_inv]
theorem inv_lt_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (inv_le_inv_of_neg hb ha)
theorem inv_lt_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_inv_of_neg hb ha)
theorem lt_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (inv_le_of_neg hb ha)
/-!
### Monotonicity results involving inversion
-/
theorem sub_inv_antitoneOn_Ioi :
AntitoneOn (fun x ↦ (x-c)⁻¹) (Set.Ioi c) :=
antitoneOn_iff_forall_lt.mpr fun _ ha _ hb hab ↦
inv_le_inv₀ (sub_pos.mpr hb) (sub_pos.mpr ha) |>.mpr <| sub_le_sub (le_of_lt hab) le_rfl
theorem sub_inv_antitoneOn_Iio :
AntitoneOn (fun x ↦ (x-c)⁻¹) (Set.Iio c) :=
antitoneOn_iff_forall_lt.mpr fun _ ha _ hb hab ↦
inv_le_inv_of_neg (sub_neg.mpr hb) (sub_neg.mpr ha) |>.mpr <| sub_le_sub (le_of_lt hab) le_rfl
theorem sub_inv_antitoneOn_Icc_right (ha : c < a) :
AntitoneOn (fun x ↦ (x-c)⁻¹) (Set.Icc a b) := by
by_cases hab : a ≤ b
· exact sub_inv_antitoneOn_Ioi.mono <| (Set.Icc_subset_Ioi_iff hab).mpr ha
· simp [hab, Set.Subsingleton.antitoneOn]
theorem sub_inv_antitoneOn_Icc_left (ha : b < c) :
AntitoneOn (fun x ↦ (x-c)⁻¹) (Set.Icc a b) := by
by_cases hab : a ≤ b
· exact sub_inv_antitoneOn_Iio.mono <| (Set.Icc_subset_Iio_iff hab).mpr ha
· simp [hab, Set.Subsingleton.antitoneOn]
theorem inv_antitoneOn_Ioi :
AntitoneOn (fun x : α ↦ x⁻¹) (Set.Ioi 0) := by
convert sub_inv_antitoneOn_Ioi (α := α)
exact (sub_zero _).symm
theorem inv_antitoneOn_Iio :
AntitoneOn (fun x : α ↦ x⁻¹) (Set.Iio 0) := by
convert sub_inv_antitoneOn_Iio (α := α)
exact (sub_zero _).symm
theorem inv_antitoneOn_Icc_right (ha : 0 < a) :
AntitoneOn (fun x : α ↦ x⁻¹) (Set.Icc a b) := by
convert sub_inv_antitoneOn_Icc_right ha
exact (sub_zero _).symm
theorem inv_antitoneOn_Icc_left (hb : b < 0) :
AntitoneOn (fun x : α ↦ x⁻¹) (Set.Icc a b) := by
convert sub_inv_antitoneOn_Icc_left hb
exact (sub_zero _).symm
/-! ### Relating two divisions -/
theorem div_le_div_of_nonpos_of_le (hc : c ≤ 0) (h : b ≤ a) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_one_div a c, div_eq_mul_one_div b c]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right h (one_div_nonpos.2 hc)
theorem div_lt_div_of_neg_of_lt (hc : c < 0) (h : b < a) : a / c < b / c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_one_div a c, div_eq_mul_one_div b c]
exact mul_lt_mul_of_neg_right h (one_div_neg.2 hc)
theorem div_le_div_right_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt <| div_lt_div_of_neg_of_lt hc, div_le_div_of_nonpos_of_le <| hc.le⟩
theorem div_lt_div_right_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a / c < b / c ↔ b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| div_le_div_right_of_neg hc
/-! ### Relating one division and involving `1` -/
theorem one_le_div_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_div_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
theorem div_le_one_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ b ≤ a := by rw [div_le_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
theorem one_lt_div_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : 1 < a / b ↔ a < b := by rw [lt_div_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
theorem div_lt_one_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : a / b < 1 ↔ b < a := by rw [div_lt_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
theorem one_div_le_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a ≤ b ↔ 1 / b ≤ a := by
simpa using inv_le_of_neg ha hb
theorem one_div_lt_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a < b ↔ 1 / b < a := by
simpa using inv_lt_of_neg ha hb
theorem le_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using le_inv_of_neg ha hb
theorem lt_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a < 1 / b ↔ b < 1 / a := by
simpa using lt_inv_of_neg ha hb
theorem one_lt_div_iff : 1 < a / b ↔ 0 < b ∧ b < a ∨ b < 0 ∧ a < b := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb | rfl | hb)
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_lt_div_of_neg]
· simp [lt_irrefl, zero_le_one]
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_lt_div]
theorem one_le_div_iff : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ 0 < b ∧ b ≤ a ∨ b < 0 ∧ a ≤ b := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb | rfl | hb)
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_le_div_of_neg]
· simp [lt_irrefl, zero_lt_one.not_le, zero_lt_one]
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_le_div]
theorem div_lt_one_iff : a / b < 1 ↔ 0 < b ∧ a < b ∨ b = 0 ∨ b < 0 ∧ b < a := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb | rfl | hb)
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, hb.ne, div_lt_one_of_neg]
· simp [zero_lt_one]
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, div_lt_one, hb.ne.symm]
theorem div_le_one_iff : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ 0 < b ∧ a ≤ b ∨ b = 0 ∨ b < 0 ∧ b ≤ a := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb | rfl | hb)
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, hb.ne, div_le_one_of_neg]
· simp [zero_le_one]
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, div_le_one, hb.ne.symm]
/-! ### Relating two divisions, involving `1` -/
theorem one_div_le_one_div_of_neg_of_le (hb : b < 0) (h : a ≤ b) : 1 / b ≤ 1 / a := by
rwa [div_le_iff_of_neg' hb, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_le_one_of_neg (h.trans_lt hb)]
theorem one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg_of_lt (hb : b < 0) (h : a < b) : 1 / b < 1 / a := by
rwa [div_lt_iff_of_neg' hb, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_lt_one_of_neg (h.trans hb)]
theorem le_of_neg_of_one_div_le_one_div (hb : b < 0) (h : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b) : b ≤ a :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg_of_lt hb) h
theorem lt_of_neg_of_one_div_lt_one_div (hb : b < 0) (h : 1 / a < 1 / b) : b < a :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_neg_of_le hb) h
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg_of_lt` and
`lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_le_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simpa [one_div] using inv_le_inv_of_neg ha hb
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt` and
`lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a < 1 / b ↔ b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_neg hb ha)
theorem one_div_lt_neg_one (h1 : a < 0) (h2 : -1 < a) : 1 / a < -1 :=
suffices 1 / a < 1 / -1 by rwa [one_div_neg_one_eq_neg_one] at this
one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg_of_lt h1 h2
theorem one_div_le_neg_one (h1 : a < 0) (h2 : -1 ≤ a) : 1 / a ≤ -1 :=
suffices 1 / a ≤ 1 / -1 by rwa [one_div_neg_one_eq_neg_one] at this
one_div_le_one_div_of_neg_of_le h1 h2
/-! ### Results about halving -/
theorem sub_self_div_two (a : α) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 := by
suffices a / 2 + a / 2 - a / 2 = a / 2 by rwa [add_halves] at this
rw [add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem div_two_sub_self (a : α) : a / 2 - a = -(a / 2) := by
suffices a / 2 - (a / 2 + a / 2) = -(a / 2) by rwa [add_halves] at this
rw [sub_add_eq_sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub]
theorem add_sub_div_two_lt (h : a < b) : a + (b - a) / 2 < b := by
rwa [← div_sub_div_same, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm (b / 2), ← add_assoc, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ←
lt_sub_iff_add_lt, sub_self_div_two, sub_self_div_two,
div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (zero_lt_two' α)]
/-- An inequality involving `2`. -/
theorem sub_one_div_inv_le_two (a2 : 2 ≤ a) : (1 - 1 / a)⁻¹ ≤ 2 := by
-- Take inverses on both sides to obtain `2⁻¹ ≤ 1 - 1 / a`
refine (inv_anti₀ (inv_pos.2 <| zero_lt_two' α) ?_).trans_eq (inv_inv (2 : α))
-- move `1 / a` to the left and `2⁻¹` to the right.
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, add_comm, ← le_sub_iff_add_le]
-- take inverses on both sides and use the assumption `2 ≤ a`.
convert (one_div a).le.trans (inv_anti₀ zero_lt_two a2) using 1
-- show `1 - 1 / 2 = 1 / 2`.
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← two_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ two_ne_zero]
/-! ### Results about `IsLUB` -/
-- TODO: Generalize to `LinearOrderedSemifield`
theorem IsLUB.mul_left {s : Set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : IsLUB s b) :
IsLUB ((fun b => a * b) '' s) (a * b) := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le ha with (ha | rfl)
· exact (OrderIso.mulLeft₀ _ ha).isLUB_image'.2 hs
· simp_rw [zero_mul]
rw [hs.nonempty.image_const]
exact isLUB_singleton
-- TODO: Generalize to `LinearOrderedSemifield`
theorem IsLUB.mul_right {s : Set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : IsLUB s b) :
IsLUB ((fun b => b * a) '' s) (b * a) := by simpa [mul_comm] using hs.mul_left ha
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem mul_sub_mul_div_mul_neg_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) :
(a * d - b * c) / (c * d) < 0 ↔ a / c < b / d := by
rw [mul_comm b c, ← div_sub_div _ _ hc hd, sub_lt_zero]
theorem mul_sub_mul_div_mul_nonpos_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) :
(a * d - b * c) / (c * d) ≤ 0 ↔ a / c ≤ b / d := by
rw [mul_comm b c, ← div_sub_div _ _ hc hd, sub_nonpos]
alias ⟨div_lt_div_of_mul_sub_mul_div_neg, mul_sub_mul_div_mul_neg⟩ := mul_sub_mul_div_mul_neg_iff
alias ⟨div_le_div_of_mul_sub_mul_div_nonpos, mul_sub_mul_div_mul_nonpos⟩ :=
mul_sub_mul_div_mul_nonpos_iff
theorem exists_add_lt_and_pos_of_lt (h : b < a) : ∃ c, b + c < a ∧ 0 < c :=
⟨(a - b) / 2, add_sub_div_two_lt h, div_pos (sub_pos_of_lt h) zero_lt_two⟩
theorem le_of_forall_sub_le (h : ∀ ε > 0, b - ε ≤ a) : b ≤ a := by
contrapose! h
simpa only [@and_comm ((0 : α) < _), lt_sub_iff_add_lt, gt_iff_lt] using
exists_add_lt_and_pos_of_lt h
private lemma exists_lt_mul_left_of_nonneg {a b c : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (h : c < a * b) :
∃ a' ∈ Set.Ico 0 a, c < a' * b := by
have hb : 0 < b := pos_of_mul_pos_right (hc.trans_lt h) ha
obtain ⟨a', ha', a_a'⟩ := exists_between ((div_lt_iff₀ hb).2 h)
exact ⟨a', ⟨(div_nonneg hc hb.le).trans ha'.le, a_a'⟩, (div_lt_iff₀ hb).1 ha'⟩
private lemma exists_lt_mul_right_of_nonneg {a b c : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (h : c < a * b) :
∃ b' ∈ Set.Ico 0 b, c < a * b' := by
have hb : 0 < b := pos_of_mul_pos_right (hc.trans_lt h) ha
simp_rw [mul_comm a] at h ⊢
exact exists_lt_mul_left_of_nonneg hb.le hc h
private lemma exists_mul_left_lt₀ {a b c : α} (hc : a * b < c) : ∃ a' > a, a' * b < c := by
rcases le_or_lt b 0 with hb | hb
· obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := exists_gt a
exact ⟨a', ha', hc.trans_le' (antitone_mul_right hb ha'.le)⟩
· obtain ⟨a', ha', hc'⟩ := exists_between ((lt_div_iff₀ hb).2 hc)
exact ⟨a', ha', (lt_div_iff₀ hb).1 hc'⟩
private lemma exists_mul_right_lt₀ {a b c : α} (hc : a * b < c) : ∃ b' > b, a * b' < c := by
simp_rw [mul_comm a] at hc ⊢; exact exists_mul_left_lt₀ hc
lemma le_mul_of_forall_lt₀ {a b c : α} (h : ∀ a' > a, ∀ b' > b, c ≤ a' * b') : c ≤ a * b := by
refine le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun d hd ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨a', ha', hd⟩ := exists_mul_left_lt₀ hd
obtain ⟨b', hb', hd⟩ := exists_mul_right_lt₀ hd
exact (h a' ha' b' hb').trans hd.le
lemma mul_le_of_forall_lt_of_nonneg {a b c : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hc : 0 ≤ c)
(h : ∀ a' ≥ 0, a' < a → ∀ b' ≥ 0, b' < b → a' * b' ≤ c) : a * b ≤ c := by
refine le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense fun d d_ab ↦ ?_
rcases lt_or_le d 0 with hd | hd
| · exact hd.le.trans hc
obtain ⟨a', ha', d_ab⟩ := exists_lt_mul_left_of_nonneg ha hd d_ab
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Basic.lean | 629 | 630 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
/-!
# Big operators and `Fin`
Some results about products and sums over the type `Fin`.
The most important results are the induction formulas `Fin.prod_univ_castSucc`
and `Fin.prod_univ_succ`, and the formula `Fin.prod_const` for the product of a
constant function. These results have variants for sums instead of products.
## Main declarations
* `finFunctionFinEquiv`: An explicit equivalence between `Fin n → Fin m` and `Fin (m ^ n)`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Finset
variable {α M : Type*}
namespace Finset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → M) :
∏ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i = ∏ i : Fin n, f i :=
(Fin.prod_univ_eq_prod_range _ _).symm
end Finset
namespace Fin
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ofFn (f : Fin n → M) : (List.ofFn f).prod = ∏ i, f i := by
simp [prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_def (f : Fin n → M) : ∏ i, f i = ((List.finRange n).map f).prod := by
rw [← List.ofFn_eq_map, prod_ofFn]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `1` because `Fin 0` is empty -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `0` because `Fin 0` is empty"]
theorem prod_univ_zero (f : Fin 0 → M) : ∏ i, f i = 1 :=
rfl
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` times the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succAbove (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) (x : Fin (n + 1)) :
∏ i, f i = f x * ∏ i : Fin n, f (x.succAbove i) := by
rw [univ_succAbove n x, prod_cons, Finset.prod_map, coe_succAboveEmb]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f 0` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f 0` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succ (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * ∏ i : Fin n, f i.succ :=
prod_univ_succAbove f 0
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_castSucc (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = (∏ i : Fin n, f (Fin.castSucc i)) * f (last n) := by
simpa [mul_comm] using prod_univ_succAbove f (last n)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_getElem (l : List M) : ∏ i : Fin l.length, l[i.1] = l.prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get := sum_univ_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get := prod_univ_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_fun_getElem (l : List α) (f : α → M) :
∏ i : Fin l.length, f l[i.1] = (l.map f).prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get' := sum_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get' := prod_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (cons x f : Fin n.succ → M) i) = x * ∏ i : Fin n, f i := by
simp_rw [prod_univ_succ, cons_zero, cons_succ]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_snoc (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (snoc f x : Fin n.succ → M) i) = (∏ i : Fin n, f i) * x := by
simp [prod_univ_castSucc]
@[to_additive sum_univ_one]
theorem prod_univ_one (f : Fin 1 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_two (f : Fin 2 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 := by
simp [prod_univ_succ]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_two' (f : α → M) (a b : α) : ∏ i, f (![a, b] i) = f a * f b :=
prod_univ_two _
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_three (f : Fin 3 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_two]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_four (f : Fin 4 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_three]
rfl
| @[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_five (f : Fin 5 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_four]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Fin.lean | 136 | 138 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.AddAut
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Totient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Divisible
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.PathConnected
import Mathlib.Topology.IsLocalHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ZMultiples
/-!
# The additive circle
We define the additive circle `AddCircle p` as the quotient `𝕜 ⧸ (ℤ ∙ p)` for some period `p : 𝕜`.
See also `Circle` and `Real.angle`. For the normed group structure on `AddCircle`, see
`AddCircle.NormedAddCommGroup` in a later file.
## Main definitions and results:
* `AddCircle`: the additive circle `𝕜 ⧸ (ℤ ∙ p)` for some period `p : 𝕜`
* `UnitAddCircle`: the special case `ℝ ⧸ ℤ`
* `AddCircle.equivAddCircle`: the rescaling equivalence `AddCircle p ≃+ AddCircle q`
* `AddCircle.equivIco`: the natural equivalence `AddCircle p ≃ Ico a (a + p)`
* `AddCircle.addOrderOf_div_of_gcd_eq_one`: rational points have finite order
* `AddCircle.exists_gcd_eq_one_of_isOfFinAddOrder`: finite-order points are rational
* `AddCircle.homeoIccQuot`: the natural topological equivalence between `AddCircle p` and
`Icc a (a + p)` with its endpoints identified.
* `AddCircle.liftIco_continuous`: if `f : ℝ → B` is continuous, and `f a = f (a + p)` for
some `a`, then there is a continuous function `AddCircle p → B` which agrees with `f` on
`Icc a (a + p)`.
## Implementation notes:
Although the most important case is `𝕜 = ℝ` we wish to support other types of scalars, such as
the rational circle `AddCircle (1 : ℚ)`, and so we set things up more generally.
## TODO
* Link with periodicity
* Lie group structure
* Exponential equivalence to `Circle`
-/
noncomputable section
open AddCommGroup Set Function AddSubgroup TopologicalSpace
open Topology
variable {𝕜 B : Type*}
section Continuity
variable [AddCommGroup 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsOrderedAddMonoid 𝕜] [Archimedean 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜]
{p : 𝕜} (hp : 0 < p) (a x : 𝕜)
theorem continuous_right_toIcoMod : ContinuousWithinAt (toIcoMod hp a) (Ici x) x := by
intro s h
rw [Filter.mem_map, mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter]
haveI : Nontrivial 𝕜 := ⟨⟨0, p, hp.ne⟩⟩
simp_rw [mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨l, u, hxI, hIs⟩ := h
let d := toIcoDiv hp a x • p
have hd := toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a x
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨_, ⟨l + d, min (a + p) u + d, ?_, fun x => id⟩, fun y => ?_⟩ <;>
simp_rw [← sub_mem_Ioo_iff_left, mem_Ioo, lt_min_iff]
· exact ⟨hxI.1, hd.2, hxI.2⟩
· rintro ⟨h, h'⟩
apply hIs
rw [← toIcoMod_sub_zsmul, (toIcoMod_eq_self _).2]
exacts [⟨h.1, h.2.2⟩, ⟨hd.1.trans (sub_le_sub_right h' _), h.2.1⟩]
theorem continuous_left_toIocMod : ContinuousWithinAt (toIocMod hp a) (Iic x) x := by
rw [(funext fun y => Eq.trans (by rw [neg_neg]) <| toIocMod_neg _ _ _ :
toIocMod hp a = (fun x => p - x) ∘ toIcoMod hp (-a) ∘ Neg.neg)]
exact
(continuous_sub_left _).continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt <|
(continuous_right_toIcoMod _ _ _).comp continuous_neg.continuousWithinAt fun y => neg_le_neg
variable {x}
theorem toIcoMod_eventuallyEq_toIocMod (hx : (x : 𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p) ≠ a) :
toIcoMod hp a =ᶠ[𝓝 x] toIocMod hp a :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds
(by
rw [Ico_eq_locus_Ioc_eq_iUnion_Ioo]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_Ioo) <|
(not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).1 <| not_modEq_iff_ne_mod_zmultiples.2 hx
theorem continuousAt_toIcoMod (hx : (x : 𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p) ≠ a) : ContinuousAt (toIcoMod hp a) x :=
let h := toIcoMod_eventuallyEq_toIocMod hp a hx
continuousAt_iff_continuous_left_right.2 <|
⟨(continuous_left_toIocMod hp a x).congr_of_eventuallyEq (h.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
h.eq_of_nhds,
continuous_right_toIcoMod hp a x⟩
theorem continuousAt_toIocMod (hx : (x : 𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p) ≠ a) : ContinuousAt (toIocMod hp a) x :=
let h := toIcoMod_eventuallyEq_toIocMod hp a hx
continuousAt_iff_continuous_left_right.2 <|
⟨continuous_left_toIocMod hp a x,
(continuous_right_toIcoMod hp a x).congr_of_eventuallyEq
(h.symm.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds) h.symm.eq_of_nhds⟩
end Continuity
/-- The "additive circle": `𝕜 ⧸ (ℤ ∙ p)`. See also `Circle` and `Real.angle`. -/
abbrev AddCircle [AddCommGroup 𝕜] (p : 𝕜) :=
𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p
namespace AddCircle
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup 𝕜] (p : 𝕜)
theorem coe_nsmul {n : ℕ} {x : 𝕜} : (↑(n • x) : AddCircle p) = n • (x : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul {n : ℤ} {x : 𝕜} : (↑(n • x) : AddCircle p) = n • (x : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_add (x y : 𝕜) : (↑(x + y) : AddCircle p) = (x : AddCircle p) + (y : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_sub (x y : 𝕜) : (↑(x - y) : AddCircle p) = (x : AddCircle p) - (y : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_neg {x : 𝕜} : (↑(-x) : AddCircle p) = -(x : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : 𝕜) = (0 : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : 𝕜} : (x : AddCircle p) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • p = x := by
simp [AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff]
theorem coe_period : (p : AddCircle p) = 0 :=
(QuotientAddGroup.eq_zero_iff p).2 <| mem_zmultiples p
theorem coe_add_period (x : 𝕜) : ((x + p : 𝕜) : AddCircle p) = x := by
rw [coe_add, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', sub_self, coe_period]
@[continuity, nolint unusedArguments]
protected theorem continuous_mk' [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] :
Continuous (QuotientAddGroup.mk' (zmultiples p) : 𝕜 → AddCircle p) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
variable [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsOrderedAddMonoid 𝕜]
theorem coe_eq_zero_of_pos_iff (hp : 0 < p) {x : 𝕜} (hx : 0 < x) :
(x : AddCircle p) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, n • p = x := by
rw [coe_eq_zero_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
· replace hx : 0 < n := by
contrapose! hx
simpa only [← neg_nonneg, ← zsmul_neg, zsmul_neg'] using zsmul_nonneg hp.le (neg_nonneg.2 hx)
exact ⟨n.toNat, by rw [← natCast_zsmul, Int.toNat_of_nonneg hx.le]⟩
· exact ⟨(n : ℤ), by simp⟩
variable [hp : Fact (0 < p)] (a : 𝕜) [Archimedean 𝕜]
/-- The equivalence between `AddCircle p` and the half-open interval `[a, a + p)`, whose inverse
is the natural quotient map. -/
def equivIco : AddCircle p ≃ Ico a (a + p) :=
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp.out a
/-- The equivalence between `AddCircle p` and the half-open interval `(a, a + p]`, whose inverse
is the natural quotient map. -/
def equivIoc : AddCircle p ≃ Ioc a (a + p) :=
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp.out a
/-- Given a function on `𝕜`, return the unique function on `AddCircle p` agreeing with `f` on
`[a, a + p)`. -/
def liftIco (f : 𝕜 → B) : AddCircle p → B :=
restrict _ f ∘ AddCircle.equivIco p a
/-- Given a function on `𝕜`, return the unique function on `AddCircle p` agreeing with `f` on
`(a, a + p]`. -/
def liftIoc (f : 𝕜 → B) : AddCircle p → B :=
restrict _ f ∘ AddCircle.equivIoc p a
variable {p a}
theorem coe_eq_coe_iff_of_mem_Ico {x y : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ Ico a (a + p)) (hy : y ∈ Ico a (a + p)) :
(x : AddCircle p) = y ↔ x = y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, by tauto⟩
suffices (⟨x, hx⟩ : Ico a (a + p)) = ⟨y, hy⟩ by exact Subtype.mk.inj this
apply_fun equivIco p a at h
rw [← (equivIco p a).right_inv ⟨x, hx⟩, ← (equivIco p a).right_inv ⟨y, hy⟩]
exact h
theorem liftIco_coe_apply {f : 𝕜 → B} {x : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ Ico a (a + p)) :
liftIco p a f ↑x = f x := by
have : (equivIco p a) x = ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]
rfl
rw [liftIco, comp_apply, this]
rfl
theorem liftIoc_coe_apply {f : 𝕜 → B} {x : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ Ioc a (a + p)) :
liftIoc p a f ↑x = f x := by
have : (equivIoc p a) x = ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]
| rfl
rw [liftIoc, comp_apply, this]
rfl
lemma eq_coe_Ico (a : AddCircle p) : ∃ b, b ∈ Ico 0 p ∧ ↑b = a := by
let b := QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp.out 0 a
exact ⟨b.1, by simpa only [zero_add] using b.2,
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/AddCircle.lean | 213 | 219 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.oangle` is the oriented angle between two vectors with respect to an orientation.
## Implementation notes
The definitions here use the `Real.angle` type, angles modulo `2 * π`. For some purposes,
angles modulo `π` are more convenient, because results are true for such angles with less
configuration dependence. Results that are only equalities modulo `π` can be represented
modulo `2 * π` as equalities of `(2 : ℤ) • θ`.
## References
* Evan Chen, Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
/-- The oriented angle from `x` to `y`, modulo `2 * π`. If either vector is 0, this is 0.
See `InnerProductGeometry.angle` for the corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when the vectors involved are nonzero. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
/-- If the first vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the second vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the two vectors passed to `oangle` are the same, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- Swapping the two vectors passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
/-- Negating both vectors passed to `oangle` does not change the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
/-- Negating the first vector produces the same angle as negating the second vector. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
/-- The angle between the negation of a nonzero vector and that vector is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and its negation is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
/-- Twice the angle between the negation of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and its negation is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the first vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, neg_add_cancel]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the second vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_cancel]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- The angle between a nonnegative multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between a vector and a nonnegative multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between two nonnegative multiples of the same vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and a multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between two multiples of a vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the left are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the right are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two pairs of vectors are equal, twice angles between those vectors are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if they are on the same ray. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only they are nonzero and the first is
on the same ray as the negation of the second. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors are
not linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if the first vector is zero
or the second is a multiple of the first. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is not zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors
are linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x y ≠ π ↔ LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [← not_or, ← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not,
oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- Two vectors are equal if and only if they have equal norms and zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero (x y : V) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ o.oangle x y = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp; rfl
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h₂.exists_nonneg_right hy
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
obtain rfl : r = 1 := by
apply mul_right_cancel₀ this
simpa [norm_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr] using h₁
simp
/-- Two vectors with equal norms are equal if and only if they have zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) : x = y ↔ o.oangle x y = 0 :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).2, fun ha =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
/-- Two vectors with zero angle between them are equal if and only if they have equal norms. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = 0) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).1, fun hn =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨hn, h⟩⟩
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the second plus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z := by
simp_rw [oangle]
rw [← Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, o.kahler_mul y x z]
· congr 1
exact mod_cast Complex.arg_real_mul _ (by positivity : 0 < ‖y‖ ^ 2)
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hy hz
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the second and the third plus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle y z + o.oangle x y = o.oangle x z := by rw [add_comm, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y = o.oangle y z := by
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add_swap hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle y z = o.oangle x y := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x = 0 := by simp [hx, hy, hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the first
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) z + o.oangle (-z) x = π := by
rw [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy, o.oangle_neg_left hy hz, o.oangle_neg_left hz hx,
show o.oangle x y + π + (o.oangle y z + π) + (o.oangle z x + π) =
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x + (π + π + π : Real.Angle) by abel,
o.oangle_add_cyc3 hx hy hz, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, zero_add, zero_add]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the second
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-z) + o.oangle z (-x) = π := by
simp_rw [← oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left hx hy hz]
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle x (x - y) = o.oangle (y - x) y := by simp [oangle, h]
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (hn : x ≠ y) (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle y x = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) y := by
rw [two_zsmul]
nth_rw 1 [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← oangle_neg_neg, ← add_assoc]
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at h
exact hn h
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (h.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
convert o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right (neg_ne_zero.2 hy) hx (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hn.symm) using 1
simp
/-- The angle between two vectors, with respect to an orientation given by `Orientation.map`
with a linear isometric equivalence, equals the angle between those two vectors, transformed by
the inverse of that equivalence, with respect to the original orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_map (x y : V') (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V') :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o).oangle x y = o.oangle (f.symm x) (f.symm y) := by
simp [oangle, o.kahler_map]
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Complex.oangle (w z : ℂ) :
Complex.orientation.oangle w z = Complex.arg (conj w * z) := by
simp [oangle, mul_comm z]
/-- The oriented angle on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 can be evaluated in
terms of a complex-number representation of the space. -/
theorem oangle_map_complex (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ)
(hf : Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o = Complex.orientation) (x y : V) :
o.oangle x y = Complex.arg (conj (f x) * f y) := by
rw [← Complex.oangle, ← hf, o.oangle_map]
iterate 2 rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
/-- Negating the orientation negates the value of `oangle`. -/
theorem oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg (x y : V) : (-o).oangle x y = -o.oangle x y := by
simp [oangle]
/-- The inner product of two vectors is the product of the norms and the cosine of the oriented
angle between the vectors. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle (x y : V) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [oangle, Real.Angle.cos_coe, Complex.cos_arg, o.norm_kahler]
· simp only [kahler_apply_apply, real_smul, add_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, I_re, ofReal_im]
field_simp
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the inner product divided by
the product of the norms. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by
rw [o.inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle]
field_simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx, norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy]
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors equals that of the unoriented
angle. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = Real.cos (InnerProductGeometry.angle x y) := by
rw [o.cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm hx hy, InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle]
/-- The oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is plus or minus the unoriented angle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y = InnerProductGeometry.angle x y ∨
o.oangle x y = -InnerProductGeometry.angle x y :=
Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.1 <| o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle hx hy
/-- The unoriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the absolute value of the oriented angle,
converted to a real. -/
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = |(o.oangle x y).toReal| := by
have h0 := InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg x y
have hpi := InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi x y
rcases o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy with (h | h)
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
/-- If the sign of the oriented angle between two vectors is zero, either one of the vectors is
zero or the unoriented angle is 0 or π. -/
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V}
(h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 0) :
x = 0 ∨ y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = π := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy]
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with (h | h) <;> simp [h, Real.pi_pos.le]
/-- If two unoriented angles are equal, and the signs of the corresponding oriented angles are
equal, then the oriented angles are equal (even in degenerate cases). -/
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {w x y z : V}
(h : InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = InnerProductGeometry.angle y z)
(hs : (o.oangle w x).sign = (o.oangle y z).sign) : o.oangle w x = o.oangle y z := by
by_cases h0 : (w = 0 ∨ x = 0) ∨ y = 0 ∨ z = 0
· have hs' : (o.oangle w x).sign = 0 ∧ (o.oangle y z).sign = 0 := by
rcases h0 with ((rfl | rfl) | rfl | rfl)
· simpa using hs.symm
· simpa using hs.symm
· simpa using hs
· simpa using hs
rcases hs' with ⟨hswx, hsyz⟩
have h' : InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = π / 2 ∧ InnerProductGeometry.angle y z = π / 2 := by
rcases h0 with ((rfl | rfl) | rfl | rfl)
· simpa using h.symm
· simpa using h.symm
· simpa using h
· simpa using h
rcases h' with ⟨hwx, hyz⟩
have hpi : π / 2 ≠ π := by
intro hpi
rw [div_eq_iff, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, mul_two, add_sub_cancel_right] at hpi
· exact Real.pi_pos.ne.symm hpi
· exact two_ne_zero
have h0wx : w = 0 ∨ x = 0 := by
have h0' := o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero hswx
simpa [hwx, Real.pi_pos.ne.symm, hpi] using h0'
have h0yz : y = 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
have h0' := o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero hsyz
simpa [hyz, Real.pi_pos.ne.symm, hpi] using h0'
rcases h0wx with (h0wx | h0wx) <;> rcases h0yz with (h0yz | h0yz) <;> simp [h0wx, h0yz]
· push_neg at h0
rw [Real.Angle.eq_iff_abs_toReal_eq_of_sign_eq hs]
rwa [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal h0.1.1 h0.1.2,
o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal h0.2.1 h0.2.2] at h
/-- If the signs of two oriented angles between nonzero vectors are equal, the oriented angles are
equal if and only if the unoriented angles are equal. -/
theorem angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq {w x y z : V} (hw : w ≠ 0) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0)
(hz : z ≠ 0) (hs : (o.oangle w x).sign = (o.oangle y z).sign) :
InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = InnerProductGeometry.angle y z ↔
o.oangle w x = o.oangle y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => o.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq h hs, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hw hx, o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hy hz, h]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors equals the unoriented angle if the sign is positive. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) :
o.oangle x y = InnerProductGeometry.angle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · exfalso; simp [hx] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · exfalso; simp [hy] at h
refine (o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy).resolve_right ?_
intro hxy
rw [hxy, Real.Angle.sign_neg, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← SignType.neg_iff, ← not_le] at h
exact h (Real.Angle.sign_coe_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg _ _)
(InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi _ _))
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors equals minus the unoriented angle if the sign is
negative. -/
theorem oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) :
o.oangle x y = -InnerProductGeometry.angle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · exfalso; simp [hx] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · exfalso; simp [hy] at h
refine (o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy).resolve_left ?_
intro hxy
rw [hxy, ← SignType.neg_iff, ← not_le] at h
exact h (Real.Angle.sign_coe_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg _ _)
(InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi _ _))
/-- The oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is zero if and only if the unoriented angle
is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· simpa [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy]
· have ha := o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy
rw [h] at ha
simpa using ha
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the unoriented angle is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = π := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_eq_self₀, not_or,
Real.pi_ne_zero]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_eq_self₀, not_or,
Real.pi_ne_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy, h]
simp [Real.pi_pos.le]
· have ha := o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy
rw [h] at ha
| simpa using ha
/-- One of two vectors is zero or the oriented angle between them is plus or minus `π / 2` if
and only if the inner product of those vectors is zero. -/
theorem eq_zero_or_oangle_eq_iff_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} :
x = 0 ∨ y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, or_iff_right hx, or_iff_right hy]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rwa [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
· convert o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy using 2 <;> rw [h]
simp only [neg_div, Real.Angle.coe_neg]
/-- If the oriented angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the inner product of those vectors
is zero. -/
theorem inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 0 :=
o.eq_zero_or_oangle_eq_iff_inner_eq_zero.1 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl h
/-- If the oriented angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the inner product of those vectors
(reversed) is zero. -/
theorem inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [real_inner_comm, o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h]
/-- If the oriented angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the inner product of those vectors
is zero. -/
theorem inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 0 :=
o.eq_zero_or_oangle_eq_iff_inner_eq_zero.1 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr h
/-- If the oriented angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the inner product of those vectors
(reversed) is zero. -/
theorem inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 683 | 716 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
/-!
# Hausdorff distance
The Hausdorff distance on subsets of a metric (or emetric) space.
Given two subsets `s` and `t` of a metric space, their Hausdorff distance is the smallest `d`
such that any point `s` is within `d` of a point in `t`, and conversely. This quantity
is often infinite (think of `s` bounded and `t` unbounded), and therefore better
expressed in the setting of emetric spaces.
## Main definitions
This files introduces:
* `EMetric.infEdist x s`, the infimum edistance of a point `x` to a set `s` in an emetric space
* `EMetric.hausdorffEdist s t`, the Hausdorff edistance of two sets in an emetric space
* Versions of these notions on metric spaces, called respectively `Metric.infDist`
and `Metric.hausdorffDist`
## Main results
* `infEdist_closure`: the edistance to a set and its closure coincide
* `EMetric.mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero`: a point `x` belongs to the closure of `s` iff
`infEdist x s = 0`
* `IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist`: if `s` is compact and non-empty, there exists a point `y`
which attains this edistance
* `IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed`: every open set `U` can be written as the increasing union
of countably many closed subsets of `U`
* `hausdorffEdist_closure`: replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance
* `hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure`: two sets have Hausdorff edistance zero
iff their closures coincide
* the Hausdorff edistance is symmetric and satisfies the triangle inequality
* in particular, closed sets in an emetric space are an emetric space
(this is shown in `EMetricSpace.closeds.emetricspace`)
* versions of these notions on metric spaces
* `hausdorffEdist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded`: if two sets in a metric space
are nonempty and bounded in a metric space, they are at finite Hausdorff edistance.
## Tags
metric space, Hausdorff distance
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Pointwise Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace EMetric
section InfEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The minimal edistance of a point to a set -/
def infEdist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ y ∈ s, edist x y
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_empty : infEdist x ∅ = ∞ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem le_infEdist {d} : d ≤ infEdist x s ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, d ≤ edist x y := by
simp only [infEdist, le_iInf_iff]
/-- The edist to a union is the minimum of the edists -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_union : infEdist x (s ∪ t) = infEdist x s ⊓ infEdist x t :=
iInf_union
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_iUnion (f : ι → Set α) (x : α) : infEdist x (⋃ i, f i) = ⨅ i, infEdist x (f i) :=
iInf_iUnion f _
lemma infEdist_biUnion {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Set α) (I : Set ι) (x : α) :
infEdist x (⋃ i ∈ I, f i) = ⨅ i ∈ I, infEdist x (f i) := by simp only [infEdist_iUnion]
/-- The edist to a singleton is the edistance to the single point of this singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_singleton : infEdist x {y} = edist x y :=
iInf_singleton
/-- The edist to a set is bounded above by the edist to any of its points -/
theorem infEdist_le_edist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y :=
iInf₂_le y h
/-- If a point `x` belongs to `s`, then its edist to `s` vanishes -/
theorem infEdist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x s = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| @edist_self _ _ x ▸ infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h
/-- The edist is antitone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infEdist_anti (h : s ⊆ t) : infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s :=
iInf_le_iInf_of_subset h
/-- The edist to a set is `< r` iff there exists a point in the set at edistance `< r` -/
theorem infEdist_lt_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : infEdist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y < r := by
simp_rw [infEdist, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
/-- The edist of `x` to `s` is bounded by the sum of the edist of `y` to `s` and
the edist from `x` to `y` -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist : infEdist x s ≤ infEdist y s + edist x y :=
calc
⨅ z ∈ s, edist x z ≤ ⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z + edist x y :=
iInf₂_mono fun _ _ => (edist_triangle _ _ _).trans_eq (add_comm _ _)
_ = (⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z) + edist x y := by simp only [ENNReal.iInf_add]
theorem infEdist_le_edist_add_infEdist : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y + infEdist y s := by
rw [add_comm]
exact infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist
theorem edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam (hy : y ∈ s) : edist x y ≤ infEdist x s + diam s := by
simp_rw [infEdist, ENNReal.iInf_add]
refine le_iInf₂ fun i hi => ?_
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x i + edist i y := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ edist x i + diam s := add_le_add le_rfl (edist_le_diam_of_mem hi hy)
/-- The edist to a set depends continuously on the point -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_infEdist : Continuous fun x => infEdist x s :=
continuous_of_le_add_edist 1 (by simp) <| by
simp only [one_mul, infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist, forall₂_true_iff]
/-- The edist to a set and to its closure coincide -/
theorem infEdist_closure : infEdist x (closure s) = infEdist x s := by
refine le_antisymm (infEdist_anti subset_closure) ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => ?_
have ε0 : 0 < (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x (closure s) < infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right h.ne ε0.ne'
obtain ⟨y : α, ycs : y ∈ closure s, hy : edist x y < infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
obtain ⟨z : α, zs : z ∈ s, dyz : edist y z < ↑ε / 2⟩ := EMetric.mem_closure_iff.1 ycs (ε / 2) ε0
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zs
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_le_add (le_of_lt hy) (le_of_lt dyz)
_ = infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε := by rw [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
/-- A point belongs to the closure of `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero : x ∈ closure s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← infEdist_closure]
exact infEdist_zero_of_mem h,
fun h =>
EMetric.mem_closure_iff.2 fun ε εpos => infEdist_lt_iff.mp <| by rwa [h]⟩
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed (h : IsClosed s) : x ∈ s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 := by
rw [← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, h.closure_eq]
/-- The infimum edistance of a point to a set is positive if and only if the point is not in the
closure of the set. -/
theorem infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x E ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem infEdist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x (closure E) ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [infEdist_closure, infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure]
theorem exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ ENNReal.ofReal ε < infEdist x E := by
rw [← infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure, ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_real_btwn] at h
rcases h with ⟨ε, ⟨_, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩⟩
exact ⟨ε, ⟨ENNReal.ofReal_pos.mp ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩
theorem disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r < infEdist x s) :
Disjoint (closedBall x r) s := by
rw [disjoint_left]
intro y hy h'y
apply lt_irrefl (infEdist x s)
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x y := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h'y
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall, edist_comm] at hy
_ < infEdist x s := h
/-- The infimum edistance is invariant under isometries -/
theorem infEdist_image (hΦ : Isometry Φ) : infEdist (Φ x) (Φ '' t) = infEdist x t := by
simp only [infEdist, iInf_image, hΦ.edist_eq]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem infEdist_smul {M} [SMul M α] [IsIsometricSMul M α] (c : M) (x : α) (s : Set α) :
infEdist (c • x) (c • s) = infEdist x s :=
infEdist_image (isometry_smul _ _)
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed {U : Set α} (hU : IsOpen U) :
∃ F : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, IsClosed (F n)) ∧ (∀ n, F n ⊆ U) ∧ ⋃ n, F n = U ∧ Monotone F := by
obtain ⟨a, a_pos, a_lt_one⟩ : ∃ a : ℝ≥0∞, 0 < a ∧ a < 1 := exists_between zero_lt_one
let F := fun n : ℕ => (fun x => infEdist x Uᶜ) ⁻¹' Ici (a ^ n)
have F_subset : ∀ n, F n ⊆ U := fun n x hx ↦ by
by_contra h
have : infEdist x Uᶜ ≠ 0 := ((ENNReal.pow_pos a_pos _).trans_le hx).ne'
exact this (infEdist_zero_of_mem h)
refine ⟨F, fun n => IsClosed.preimage continuous_infEdist isClosed_Ici, F_subset, ?_, ?_⟩
· show ⋃ n, F n = U
refine Subset.antisymm (by simp only [iUnion_subset_iff, F_subset, forall_const]) fun x hx => ?_
have : ¬x ∈ Uᶜ := by simpa using hx
rw [mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed hU.isClosed_compl] at this
have B : 0 < infEdist x Uᶜ := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using this
have : Filter.Tendsto (fun n => a ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one a_lt_one
rcases ((tendsto_order.1 this).2 _ B).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Ici, mem_preimage]
exact ⟨n, hn.le⟩
show Monotone F
intro m n hmn x hx
simp only [F, mem_Ici, mem_preimage] at hx ⊢
apply le_trans (pow_le_pow_right_of_le_one' a_lt_one.le hmn) hx
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, infEdist x s = edist x y := by
have A : Continuous fun y => edist x y := continuous_const.edist continuous_id
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne A.continuousOn
exact ⟨y, ys, le_antisymm (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) (by rwa [le_infEdist])⟩
theorem exists_pos_forall_lt_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (hst : Disjoint s t) :
∃ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (r : ℝ≥0∞) < edist x y := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· use 1
simp
obtain ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne continuous_infEdist.continuousOn
have : 0 < infEdist x t :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun H => hst.le_bot ⟨hx, (mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed ht).mpr H⟩
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 this with ⟨r, h₀, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, ENNReal.coe_pos.mp h₀, fun y hy z hz => hr.trans_le <| le_infEdist.1 (h hy) z hz⟩
end InfEdist
/-! ### The Hausdorff distance as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between two sets is the smallest `r` such that each set
is contained in the `r`-neighborhood of the other one -/
irreducible_def hausdorffEdist {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (s t : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
(⨆ x ∈ s, infEdist x t) ⊔ ⨆ y ∈ t, infEdist y s
section HausdorffEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x : α} {s t u : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-- The Hausdorff edistance of a set to itself vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_self : hausdorffEdist s s = 0 := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_idem, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero]
exact fun x hx => infEdist_zero_of_mem hx
/-- The Haudorff edistances of `s` to `t` and of `t` to `s` coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_comm : hausdorffEdist s t = hausdorffEdist t s := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def]; apply sup_comm
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by bounding the edistance of any point
in each set to the other set -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, infEdist x t ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, infEdist x s ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff]
exact ⟨H1, H2⟩
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by exhibiting, for any point in each set,
another point in the other set at controlled distance -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, edist x y ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
refine hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist (fun x xs ↦ ?_) (fun x xt ↦ ?_)
· rcases H1 x xs with ⟨y, yt, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem yt) hy
· rcases H2 x xt with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) hy
/-- The distance to a set is controlled by the Hausdorff distance. -/
theorem infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x t ≤ hausdorffEdist s t := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_def]
refine le_trans ?_ le_sup_left
exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) x h
/-- If the Hausdorff distance is `< r`, then any point in one of the sets has
a corresponding point at distance `< r` in the other set. -/
theorem exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x ∈ s) (H : hausdorffEdist s t < r) :
∃ y ∈ t, edist x y < r :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp <|
calc
infEdist x t ≤ hausdorffEdist s t := infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem h
_ < r := H
/-- The distance from `x` to `s` or `t` is controlled in terms of the Hausdorff distance
between `s` and `t`. -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist :
infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s + hausdorffEdist s t :=
ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => by
have ε0 : (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x s < infEdist x s + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ENNReal.add_lt_top.1 h).1.ne ε0
obtain ⟨y : α, ys : y ∈ s, dxy : edist x y < infEdist x s + ↑ε / 2⟩ := infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
have : hausdorffEdist s t < hausdorffEdist s t + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ENNReal.add_lt_top.1 h).2.ne ε0
obtain ⟨z : α, zt : z ∈ t, dyz : edist y z < hausdorffEdist s t + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt ys this
calc
infEdist x t ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zt
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x s + ε / 2 + (hausdorffEdist s t + ε / 2) := add_le_add dxy.le dyz.le
_ = infEdist x s + hausdorffEdist s t + ε := by
simp [ENNReal.add_halves, add_comm, add_left_comm]
/-- The Hausdorff edistance is invariant under isometries. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_image (h : Isometry Φ) :
hausdorffEdist (Φ '' s) (Φ '' t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, iSup_image, infEdist_image h]
/-- The Hausdorff distance is controlled by the diameter of the union. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_ediam (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
hausdorffEdist s t ≤ diam (s ∪ t) := by
rcases hs with ⟨x, xs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨y, yt⟩
refine hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist ?_ ?_
· intro z hz
exact ⟨y, yt, edist_le_diam_of_mem (subset_union_left hz) (subset_union_right yt)⟩
· intro z hz
exact ⟨x, xs, edist_le_diam_of_mem (subset_union_right hz) (subset_union_left xs)⟩
/-- The Hausdorff distance satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_triangle : hausdorffEdist s u ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_def]
simp only [sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff]
constructor
· show ∀ x ∈ s, infEdist x u ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u
exact fun x xs =>
calc
infEdist x u ≤ infEdist x t + hausdorffEdist t u :=
infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u :=
add_le_add_right (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xs) _
· show ∀ x ∈ u, infEdist x s ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u
exact fun x xu =>
calc
infEdist x s ≤ infEdist x t + hausdorffEdist t s :=
infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist u t + hausdorffEdist t s :=
add_le_add_right (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xu) _
_ = hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u := by simp [hausdorffEdist_comm, add_comm]
/-- Two sets are at zero Hausdorff edistance if and only if they have the same closure. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure :
hausdorffEdist s t = 0 ↔ closure s = closure t := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, ENNReal.sup_eq_zero, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero, ← subset_def,
← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, subset_antisymm_iff, isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff]
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between a set and its closure vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_self_closure : hausdorffEdist s (closure s) = 0 := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure, closure_closure]
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure₁ : hausdorffEdist (closure s) t = hausdorffEdist s t := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· calc
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist (closure s) s + hausdorffEdist s t := hausdorffEdist_triangle
_ = hausdorffEdist s t := by simp [hausdorffEdist_comm]
· calc
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist s (closure s) + hausdorffEdist (closure s) t := hausdorffEdist_triangle
_ = hausdorffEdist (closure s) t := by simp
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure₂ : hausdorffEdist s (closure t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp [@hausdorffEdist_comm _ _ s _]
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between sets or their closures is the same. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure : hausdorffEdist (closure s) (closure t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp
/-- Two closed sets are at zero Hausdorff edistance if and only if they coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) :
hausdorffEdist s t = 0 ↔ s = t := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure, hs.closure_eq, ht.closure_eq]
/-- The Haudorff edistance to the empty set is infinite. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_empty (ne : s.Nonempty) : hausdorffEdist s ∅ = ∞ := by
rcases ne with ⟨x, xs⟩
have : infEdist x ∅ ≤ hausdorffEdist s ∅ := infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xs
simpa using this
/-- If a set is at finite Hausdorff edistance of a nonempty set, it is nonempty. -/
theorem nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top (hs : s.Nonempty) (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
t.Nonempty :=
t.eq_empty_or_nonempty.resolve_left fun ht ↦ fin (ht.symm ▸ hausdorffEdist_empty hs)
theorem empty_or_nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
(s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅) ∨ (s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with ht | ht
· exact Or.inl ⟨hs, ht⟩
· rw [hausdorffEdist_comm] at fin
exact Or.inr ⟨nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top ht fin, ht⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hs, nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top hs fin⟩
end HausdorffEdist
-- section
end EMetric
/-! Now, we turn to the same notions in metric spaces. To avoid the difficulties related to
`sInf` and `sSup` on `ℝ` (which is only conditionally complete), we use the notions in `ℝ≥0∞`
formulated in terms of the edistance, and coerce them to `ℝ`.
Then their properties follow readily from the corresponding properties in `ℝ≥0∞`,
modulo some tedious rewriting of inequalities from one to the other. -/
--namespace
namespace Metric
section
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {s t u : Set α} {x y : α} {Φ : α → β}
open EMetric
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ`. -/
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set -/
def infDist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
ENNReal.toReal (infEdist x s)
theorem infDist_eq_iInf : infDist x s = ⨅ y : s, dist x y := by
rw [infDist, infEdist, iInf_subtype', ENNReal.toReal_iInf]
· simp only [dist_edist]
· exact fun _ ↦ edist_ne_top _ _
/-- The minimal distance is always nonnegative -/
theorem infDist_nonneg : 0 ≤ infDist x s := toReal_nonneg
/-- The minimal distance to the empty set is 0 (if you want to have the more reasonable
value `∞` instead, use `EMetric.infEdist`, which takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`) -/
@[simp]
theorem infDist_empty : infDist x ∅ = 0 := by simp [infDist]
lemma isGLB_infDist (hs : s.Nonempty) : IsGLB ((dist x ·) '' s) (infDist x s) := by
simpa [infDist_eq_iInf, sInf_image']
using isGLB_csInf (hs.image _) ⟨0, by simp [lowerBounds, dist_nonneg]⟩
/-- In a metric space, the minimal edistance to a nonempty set is finite. -/
theorem infEdist_ne_top (h : s.Nonempty) : infEdist x s ≠ ⊤ := by
rcases h with ⟨y, hy⟩
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (edist_ne_top _ _) (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem hy)
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_eq_top_iff : infEdist x s = ∞ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs <;> simp [*, Nonempty.ne_empty, infEdist_ne_top]
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set containing it vanishes. -/
theorem infDist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infDist x s = 0 := by
simp [infEdist_zero_of_mem h, infDist]
/-- The minimal distance to a singleton is the distance to the unique point in this singleton. -/
@[simp]
theorem infDist_singleton : infDist x {y} = dist x y := by simp [infDist, dist_edist]
/-- The minimal distance to a set is bounded by the distance to any point in this set. -/
theorem infDist_le_dist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infDist x s ≤ dist x y := by
rw [dist_edist, infDist]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono (edist_ne_top _ _) (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h)
/-- The minimal distance is monotone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infDist_le_infDist_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : infDist x t ≤ infDist x s :=
ENNReal.toReal_mono (infEdist_ne_top hs) (infEdist_anti h)
lemma le_infDist {r : ℝ} (hs : s.Nonempty) : r ≤ infDist x s ↔ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → r ≤ dist x y := by
simp_rw [infDist, ← ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal (infEdist_ne_top hs), le_infEdist,
ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal (edist_ne_top _ _), ← dist_edist]
/-- The minimal distance to a set `s` is `< r` iff there exists a point in `s` at distance `< r`. -/
theorem infDist_lt_iff {r : ℝ} (hs : s.Nonempty) : infDist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < r := by
simp [← not_le, le_infDist hs]
/-- The minimal distance from `x` to `s` is bounded by the distance from `y` to `s`, modulo
the distance between `x` and `y`. -/
theorem infDist_le_infDist_add_dist : infDist x s ≤ infDist y s + dist x y := by
rw [infDist, infDist, dist_edist]
refine ENNReal.toReal_le_add' infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist ?_ (flip absurd (edist_ne_top _ _))
simp only [infEdist_eq_top_iff, imp_self]
theorem not_mem_of_dist_lt_infDist (h : dist x y < infDist x s) : y ∉ s := fun hy =>
h.not_le <| infDist_le_dist_of_mem hy
theorem disjoint_ball_infDist : Disjoint (ball x (infDist x s)) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _y hy => not_mem_of_dist_lt_infDist <| mem_ball'.1 hy
theorem ball_infDist_subset_compl : ball x (infDist x s) ⊆ sᶜ :=
(disjoint_ball_infDist (s := s)).subset_compl_right
theorem ball_infDist_compl_subset : ball x (infDist x sᶜ) ⊆ s :=
ball_infDist_subset_compl.trans_eq (compl_compl s)
theorem disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infDist {r : ℝ} (h : r < infDist x s) :
Disjoint (closedBall x r) s :=
disjoint_ball_infDist.mono_left <| closedBall_subset_ball h
theorem dist_le_infDist_add_diam (hs : IsBounded s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
dist x y ≤ infDist x s + diam s := by
rw [infDist, diam, dist_edist]
exact toReal_le_add (edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam hy) (infEdist_ne_top ⟨y, hy⟩) hs.ediam_ne_top
variable (s)
/-- The minimal distance to a set is Lipschitz in point with constant 1 -/
theorem lipschitz_infDist_pt : LipschitzWith 1 (infDist · s) :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => infDist_le_infDist_add_dist
/-- The minimal distance to a set is uniformly continuous in point -/
theorem uniformContinuous_infDist_pt : UniformContinuous (infDist · s) :=
(lipschitz_infDist_pt s).uniformContinuous
/-- The minimal distance to a set is continuous in point -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_infDist_pt : Continuous (infDist · s) :=
(uniformContinuous_infDist_pt s).continuous
variable {s}
/-- The minimal distances to a set and its closure coincide. -/
theorem infDist_closure : infDist x (closure s) = infDist x s := by
simp [infDist, infEdist_closure]
/-- If a point belongs to the closure of `s`, then its infimum distance to `s` equals zero.
The converse is true provided that `s` is nonempty, see `Metric.mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero`. -/
theorem infDist_zero_of_mem_closure (hx : x ∈ closure s) : infDist x s = 0 := by
rw [← infDist_closure]
exact infDist_zero_of_mem hx
/-- A point belongs to the closure of `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes. -/
theorem mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero (h : s.Nonempty) : x ∈ closure s ↔ infDist x s = 0 := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, infDist, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, infEdist_ne_top h]
theorem infDist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure (hs : s.Nonempty) :
x ∉ closure s ↔ 0 < infDist x s :=
(mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero hs).not.trans infDist_nonneg.gt_iff_ne.symm
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes -/
theorem _root_.IsClosed.mem_iff_infDist_zero (h : IsClosed s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
x ∈ s ↔ infDist x s = 0 := by rw [← mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero hs, h.closure_eq]
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes. -/
theorem _root_.IsClosed.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos (h : IsClosed s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
x ∉ s ↔ 0 < infDist x s := by
simp [h.mem_iff_infDist_zero hs, infDist_nonneg.gt_iff_ne]
theorem continuousAt_inv_infDist_pt (h : x ∉ closure s) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ (infDist x s)⁻¹) x := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hs)
· simp only [infDist_empty, continuousAt_const]
· refine (continuous_infDist_pt s).continuousAt.inv₀ ?_
rwa [Ne, ← mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero hs]
/-- The infimum distance is invariant under isometries. -/
theorem infDist_image (hΦ : Isometry Φ) : infDist (Φ x) (Φ '' t) = infDist x t := by
simp [infDist, infEdist_image hΦ]
theorem infDist_inter_closedBall_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) :
infDist x (s ∩ closedBall x (dist y x)) = infDist x s := by
replace h : y ∈ s ∩ closedBall x (dist y x) := ⟨h, mem_closedBall.2 le_rfl⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ (infDist_le_infDist_of_subset inter_subset_left ⟨y, h⟩)
refine not_lt.1 fun hlt => ?_
rcases (infDist_lt_iff ⟨y, h.1⟩).mp hlt with ⟨z, hzs, hz⟩
rcases le_or_lt (dist z x) (dist y x) with hle | hlt
· exact hz.not_le (infDist_le_dist_of_mem ⟨hzs, hle⟩)
· rw [dist_comm z, dist_comm y] at hlt
exact (hlt.trans hz).not_le (infDist_le_dist_of_mem h)
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_infDist_eq_dist (h : IsCompact s) (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, infDist x s = dist x y :=
let ⟨y, hys, hy⟩ := h.exists_infEdist_eq_edist hne x
⟨y, hys, by rw [infDist, dist_edist, hy]⟩
theorem _root_.IsClosed.exists_infDist_eq_dist [ProperSpace α] (h : IsClosed s) (hne : s.Nonempty)
(x : α) : ∃ y ∈ s, infDist x s = dist x y := by
rcases hne with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [← infDist_inter_closedBall_of_mem hz]
set t := s ∩ closedBall x (dist z x)
have htc : IsCompact t := (isCompact_closedBall x (dist z x)).inter_left h
have htne : t.Nonempty := ⟨z, hz, mem_closedBall.2 le_rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y, ⟨hys, -⟩, hyd⟩ : ∃ y ∈ t, infDist x t = dist x y := htc.exists_infDist_eq_dist htne x
exact ⟨y, hys, hyd⟩
theorem exists_mem_closure_infDist_eq_dist [ProperSpace α] (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ closure s, infDist x s = dist x y := by
simpa only [infDist_closure] using isClosed_closure.exists_infDist_eq_dist hne.closure x
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ≥0`. -/
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set as a `ℝ≥0` -/
def infNndist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0 :=
| ENNReal.toNNReal (infEdist x s)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/HausdorffDistance.lean | 603 | 605 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Sina Hazratpour
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Cat.AsSmall
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elements
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Over.Basic
/-!
# The Grothendieck construction
Given a functor `F : C ⥤ Cat`, the objects of `Grothendieck F`
consist of dependent pairs `(b, f)`, where `b : C` and `f : F.obj c`,
and a morphism `(b, f) ⟶ (b', f')` is a pair `β : b ⟶ b'` in `C`, and
`φ : (F.map β).obj f ⟶ f'`
`Grothendieck.functor` makes the Grothendieck construction into a functor from the functor category
`C ⥤ Cat` to the over category `Over C` in the category of categories.
Categories such as `PresheafedSpace` are in fact examples of this construction,
and it may be interesting to try to generalize some of the development there.
## Implementation notes
Really we should treat `Cat` as a 2-category, and allow `F` to be a 2-functor.
There is also a closely related construction starting with `G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Cat`,
where morphisms consists again of `β : b ⟶ b'` and `φ : f ⟶ (F.map (op β)).obj f'`.
## Notable constructions
- `Grothendieck F` is the Grothendieck construction.
- Elements of `Grothendieck F` whose base is `c : C` can be transported along `f : c ⟶ d` using
`transport`.
- A natural transformation `α : F ⟶ G` induces `map α : Grothendieck F ⥤ Grothendieck G`.
- The Grothendieck construction and `map` together form a functor (`functor`) from the functor
category `E ⥤ Cat` to the over category `Over E`.
- A functor `G : D ⥤ C` induces `pre F G : Grothendieck (G ⋙ F) ⥤ Grothendieck F`.
## References
See also `CategoryTheory.Functor.Elements` for the category of elements of functor `F : C ⥤ Type`.
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02XV
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Grothendieck+construction
-/
universe w u v u₁ v₁ u₂ v₂
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {D : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} D]
variable (F : C ⥤ Cat.{v₂, u₂})
/--
The Grothendieck construction (often written as `∫ F` in mathematics) for a functor `F : C ⥤ Cat`
gives a category whose
* objects `X` consist of `X.base : C` and `X.fiber : F.obj base`
* morphisms `f : X ⟶ Y` consist of
`base : X.base ⟶ Y.base` and
`f.fiber : (F.map base).obj X.fiber ⟶ Y.fiber`
-/
structure Grothendieck where
/-- The underlying object in `C` -/
base : C
/-- The object in the fiber of the base object. -/
fiber : F.obj base
namespace Grothendieck
variable {F}
/-- A morphism in the Grothendieck category `F : C ⥤ Cat` consists of
`base : X.base ⟶ Y.base` and `f.fiber : (F.map base).obj X.fiber ⟶ Y.fiber`.
-/
structure Hom (X Y : Grothendieck F) where
/-- The morphism between base objects. -/
base : X.base ⟶ Y.base
/-- The morphism from the pushforward to the source fiber object to the target fiber object. -/
fiber : (F.map base).obj X.fiber ⟶ Y.fiber
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem ext {X Y : Grothendieck F} (f g : Hom X Y) (w_base : f.base = g.base)
(w_fiber : eqToHom (by rw [w_base]) ≫ f.fiber = g.fiber) : f = g := by
cases f; cases g
congr
dsimp at w_base
aesop_cat
/-- The identity morphism in the Grothendieck category.
-/
def id (X : Grothendieck F) : Hom X X where
base := 𝟙 X.base
fiber := eqToHom (by simp)
instance (X : Grothendieck F) : Inhabited (Hom X X) :=
⟨id X⟩
/-- Composition of morphisms in the Grothendieck category.
-/
def comp {X Y Z : Grothendieck F} (f : Hom X Y) (g : Hom Y Z) : Hom X Z where
base := f.base ≫ g.base
fiber :=
eqToHom (by simp) ≫ (F.map g.base).map f.fiber ≫ g.fiber
attribute [local simp] eqToHom_map
instance : Category (Grothendieck F) where
Hom X Y := Grothendieck.Hom X Y
id X := Grothendieck.id X
comp f g := Grothendieck.comp f g
comp_id {X Y} f := by
ext
· simp [comp, id]
· dsimp [comp, id]
rw [← NatIso.naturality_2 (eqToIso (F.map_id Y.base)) f.fiber]
simp
id_comp f := by ext <;> simp [comp, id]
assoc f g h := by
ext
· simp [comp, id]
· dsimp [comp, id]
rw [← NatIso.naturality_2 (eqToIso (F.map_comp _ _)) f.fiber]
simp
@[simp]
theorem id_base (X : Grothendieck F) :
| Hom.base (𝟙 X) = 𝟙 X.base := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_fiber (X : Grothendieck F) :
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Grothendieck.lean | 132 | 136 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Charpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Prod
/-!
# Characteristic polynomial
## Main result
* `LinearMap.charpoly_toMatrix f` : `charpoly f` is the characteristic polynomial of the matrix
of `f` in any basis.
-/
universe u v w
variable {R M M₁ M₂ : Type*} [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M]
variable [AddCommGroup M₁] [Module R M₁] [Module.Finite R M₁] [Module.Free R M₁]
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [Module.Finite R M₂] [Module.Free R M₂]
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] M)
open Matrix
noncomputable section
open Module.Free Polynomial Matrix
namespace LinearMap
section Basic
/- These attribute tweaks save ~ 2000 heartbeats in `LinearMap.charpoly_toMatrix`. -/
attribute [-instance] instCoeOutOfCoeSort
attribute [local instance 2000] RingHomClass.toNonUnitalRingHomClass
attribute [local instance 2000] NonUnitalRingHomClass.toMulHomClass
/-- `charpoly f` is the characteristic polynomial of the matrix of `f` in any basis. -/
@[simp]
theorem charpoly_toMatrix {ι : Type w} [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M) :
| (toMatrix b b f).charpoly = f.charpoly := by
let A := toMatrix b b f
let b' := chooseBasis R M
let ι' := ChooseBasisIndex R M
let A' := toMatrix b' b' f
let e := Basis.indexEquiv b b'
let φ := reindexLinearEquiv R R e e
let φ₁ := reindexLinearEquiv R R e (Equiv.refl ι')
let φ₂ := reindexLinearEquiv R R (Equiv.refl ι') (Equiv.refl ι')
let φ₃ := reindexLinearEquiv R R (Equiv.refl ι') e
let P := b.toMatrix b'
let Q := b'.toMatrix b
have hPQ : C.mapMatrix (φ₁ P) * C.mapMatrix (φ₃ Q) = 1 := by
rw [RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, ← Matrix.map_mul,
reindexLinearEquiv_mul R R, Basis.toMatrix_mul_toMatrix_flip,
reindexLinearEquiv_one, ← RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, RingHom.map_one]
calc
A.charpoly = (reindex e e A).charpoly := (charpoly_reindex _ _).symm
_ = det (scalar ι' X - C.mapMatrix (φ A)) := rfl
_ = det (scalar ι' X - C.mapMatrix (φ (P * A' * Q))) := by
rw [basis_toMatrix_mul_linearMap_toMatrix_mul_basis_toMatrix]
_ = det (scalar ι' X - C.mapMatrix (φ₁ P * φ₂ A' * φ₃ Q)) := by
rw [reindexLinearEquiv_mul, reindexLinearEquiv_mul]
_ = det (scalar ι' X - C.mapMatrix (φ₁ P) * C.mapMatrix A' * C.mapMatrix (φ₃ Q)) := by
simp [φ₁, φ₂, φ₃, ι']
_ = det (scalar ι' X * C.mapMatrix (φ₁ P) * C.mapMatrix (φ₃ Q) -
C.mapMatrix (φ₁ P) * C.mapMatrix A' * C.mapMatrix (φ₃ Q)) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc ((scalar ι') X), hPQ, Matrix.mul_one]
_ = det (C.mapMatrix (φ₁ P) * scalar ι' X * C.mapMatrix (φ₃ Q) -
C.mapMatrix (φ₁ P) * C.mapMatrix A' * C.mapMatrix (φ₃ Q)) := by
rw [scalar_commute _ commute_X]
_ = det (C.mapMatrix (φ₁ P) * (scalar ι' X - C.mapMatrix A') * C.mapMatrix (φ₃ Q)) := by
rw [← Matrix.sub_mul, ← Matrix.mul_sub]
_ = det (C.mapMatrix (φ₁ P)) * det (scalar ι' X - C.mapMatrix A') * det (C.mapMatrix (φ₃ Q)) :=
by rw [det_mul, det_mul]
_ = det (C.mapMatrix (φ₁ P)) * det (C.mapMatrix (φ₃ Q)) * det (scalar ι' X - C.mapMatrix A') :=
by ring
_ = det (scalar ι' X - C.mapMatrix A') := by
rw [← det_mul, hPQ, det_one, one_mul]
_ = f.charpoly := rfl
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Charpoly/ToMatrix.lean | 48 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Tape
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
import Mathlib.Computability.PostTuringMachine
/-!
# Turing machines
The files `PostTuringMachine.lean` and `TuringMachine.lean` define
a sequence of simple machine languages, starting with Turing machines and working
up to more complex languages based on Wang B-machines.
`PostTuringMachine.lean` covers the TM0 model and TM1 model;
`TuringMachine.lean` adds the TM2 model.
## Naming conventions
Each model of computation in this file shares a naming convention for the elements of a model of
computation. These are the parameters for the language:
* `Γ` is the alphabet on the tape.
* `Λ` is the set of labels, or internal machine states.
* `σ` is the type of internal memory, not on the tape. This does not exist in the TM0 model, and
later models achieve this by mixing it into `Λ`.
* `K` is used in the TM2 model, which has multiple stacks, and denotes the number of such stacks.
All of these variables denote "essentially finite" types, but for technical reasons it is
convenient to allow them to be infinite anyway. When using an infinite type, we will be interested
to prove that only finitely many values of the type are ever interacted with.
Given these parameters, there are a few common structures for the model that arise:
* `Stmt` is the set of all actions that can be performed in one step. For the TM0 model this set is
finite, and for later models it is an infinite inductive type representing "possible program
texts".
* `Cfg` is the set of instantaneous configurations, that is, the state of the machine together with
its environment.
* `Machine` is the set of all machines in the model. Usually this is approximately a function
`Λ → Stmt`, although different models have different ways of halting and other actions.
* `step : Cfg → Option Cfg` is the function that describes how the state evolves over one step.
If `step c = none`, then `c` is a terminal state, and the result of the computation is read off
from `c`. Because of the type of `step`, these models are all deterministic by construction.
* `init : Input → Cfg` sets up the initial state. The type `Input` depends on the model;
in most cases it is `List Γ`.
* `eval : Machine → Input → Part Output`, given a machine `M` and input `i`, starts from
`init i`, runs `step` until it reaches an output, and then applies a function `Cfg → Output` to
the final state to obtain the result. The type `Output` depends on the model.
* `Supports : Machine → Finset Λ → Prop` asserts that a machine `M` starts in `S : Finset Λ`, and
can only ever jump to other states inside `S`. This implies that the behavior of `M` on any input
cannot depend on its values outside `S`. We use this to allow `Λ` to be an infinite set when
convenient, and prove that only finitely many of these states are actually accessible. This
formalizes "essentially finite" mentioned above.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open List (Vector)
open Relation
open Nat (iterate)
open Function (update iterate_succ iterate_succ_apply iterate_succ' iterate_succ_apply'
iterate_zero_apply)
namespace Turing
/-!
## The TM2 model
The TM2 model removes the tape entirely from the TM1 model, replacing it with an arbitrary (finite)
collection of stacks, each with elements of different types (the alphabet of stack `k : K` is
`Γ k`). The statements are:
* `push k (f : σ → Γ k) q` puts `f a` on the `k`-th stack, then does `q`.
* `pop k (f : σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) q` changes the state to `f a (S k).head`, where `S k` is the
value of the `k`-th stack, and removes this element from the stack, then does `q`.
* `peek k (f : σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) q` changes the state to `f a (S k).head`, where `S k` is the
value of the `k`-th stack, then does `q`.
* `load (f : σ → σ) q` reads nothing but applies `f` to the internal state, then does `q`.
* `branch (f : σ → Bool) qtrue qfalse` does `qtrue` or `qfalse` according to `f a`.
* `goto (f : σ → Λ)` jumps to label `f a`.
* `halt` halts on the next step.
The configuration is a tuple `(l, var, stk)` where `l : Option Λ` is the current label to run or
`none` for the halting state, `var : σ` is the (finite) internal state, and `stk : ∀ k, List (Γ k)`
is the collection of stacks. (Note that unlike the `TM0` and `TM1` models, these are not
`ListBlank`s, they have definite ends that can be detected by the `pop` command.)
Given a designated stack `k` and a value `L : List (Γ k)`, the initial configuration has all the
stacks empty except the designated "input" stack; in `eval` this designated stack also functions
as the output stack.
-/
namespace TM2
variable {K : Type*}
-- Index type of stacks
variable (Γ : K → Type*)
-- Type of stack elements
variable (Λ : Type*)
-- Type of function labels
variable (σ : Type*)
-- Type of variable settings
/-- The TM2 model removes the tape entirely from the TM1 model,
replacing it with an arbitrary (finite) collection of stacks.
The operation `push` puts an element on one of the stacks,
and `pop` removes an element from a stack (and modifying the
internal state based on the result). `peek` modifies the
internal state but does not remove an element. -/
inductive Stmt
| push : ∀ k, (σ → Γ k) → Stmt → Stmt
| peek : ∀ k, (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| pop : ∀ k, (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| load : (σ → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| branch : (σ → Bool) → Stmt → Stmt → Stmt
| goto : (σ → Λ) → Stmt
| halt : Stmt
open Stmt
instance Stmt.inhabited : Inhabited (Stmt Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨halt⟩
/-- A configuration in the TM2 model is a label (or `none` for the halt state), the state of
local variables, and the stacks. (Note that the stacks are not `ListBlank`s, they have a definite
size.) -/
structure Cfg where
/-- The current label to run (or `none` for the halting state) -/
l : Option Λ
/-- The internal state -/
var : σ
/-- The (finite) collection of internal stacks -/
stk : ∀ k, List (Γ k)
instance Cfg.inhabited [Inhabited σ] : Inhabited (Cfg Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨⟨default, default, default⟩⟩
variable {Γ Λ σ}
section
variable [DecidableEq K]
/-- The step function for the TM2 model. -/
def stepAux : Stmt Γ Λ σ → σ → (∀ k, List (Γ k)) → Cfg Γ Λ σ
| push k f q, v, S => stepAux q v (update S k (f v :: S k))
| peek k f q, v, S => stepAux q (f v (S k).head?) S
| pop k f q, v, S => stepAux q (f v (S k).head?) (update S k (S k).tail)
| load a q, v, S => stepAux q (a v) S
| branch f q₁ q₂, v, S => cond (f v) (stepAux q₁ v S) (stepAux q₂ v S)
| goto f, v, S => ⟨some (f v), v, S⟩
| halt, v, S => ⟨none, v, S⟩
/-- The step function for the TM2 model. -/
def step (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) : Cfg Γ Λ σ → Option (Cfg Γ Λ σ)
| ⟨none, _, _⟩ => none
| ⟨some l, v, S⟩ => some (stepAux (M l) v S)
attribute [simp] stepAux.eq_1 stepAux.eq_2 stepAux.eq_3
stepAux.eq_4 stepAux.eq_5 stepAux.eq_6 stepAux.eq_7 step.eq_1 step.eq_2
/-- The (reflexive) reachability relation for the TM2 model. -/
def Reaches (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) : Cfg Γ Λ σ → Cfg Γ Λ σ → Prop :=
ReflTransGen fun a b ↦ b ∈ step M a
end
/-- Given a set `S` of states, `SupportsStmt S q` means that `q` only jumps to states in `S`. -/
def SupportsStmt (S : Finset Λ) : Stmt Γ Λ σ → Prop
| push _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| peek _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| pop _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| load _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| branch _ q₁ q₂ => SupportsStmt S q₁ ∧ SupportsStmt S q₂
| goto l => ∀ v, l v ∈ S
| halt => True
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of subtree statements in a statement. -/
noncomputable def stmts₁ : Stmt Γ Λ σ → Finset (Stmt Γ Λ σ)
| Q@(push _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(peek _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(pop _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(load _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(branch _ q₁ q₂) => insert Q (stmts₁ q₁ ∪ stmts₁ q₂)
| Q@(goto _) => {Q}
| Q@halt => {Q}
theorem stmts₁_self {q : Stmt Γ Λ σ} : q ∈ stmts₁ q := by
cases q <;> simp only [Finset.mem_insert_self, Finset.mem_singleton_self, stmts₁]
theorem stmts₁_trans {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂ → stmts₁ q₁ ⊆ stmts₁ q₂ := by
classical
intro h₁₂ q₀ h₀₁
induction q₂ with (
simp only [stmts₁] at h₁₂ ⊢
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.mem_union] at h₁₂)
| branch f q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ =>
rcases h₁₂ with (rfl | h₁₂ | h₁₂)
· unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁
exact h₀₁
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_union_left _ (IH₁ h₁₂))
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_union_right _ (IH₂ h₁₂))
| goto l => subst h₁₂; exact h₀₁
| halt => subst h₁₂; exact h₀₁
| load _ q IH | _ _ _ q IH =>
rcases h₁₂ with (rfl | h₁₂)
· unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁
exact h₀₁
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (IH h₁₂)
theorem stmts₁_supportsStmt_mono {S : Finset Λ} {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} (h : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂)
(hs : SupportsStmt S q₂) : SupportsStmt S q₁ := by
induction q₂ with
simp only [stmts₁, SupportsStmt, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_union, Finset.mem_singleton]
at h hs
| branch f q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ => rcases h with (rfl | h | h); exacts [hs, IH₁ h hs.1, IH₂ h hs.2]
| goto l => subst h; exact hs
| halt => subst h; trivial
| load _ _ IH | _ _ _ _ IH => rcases h with (rfl | h) <;> [exact hs; exact IH h hs]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of statements accessible from initial set `S` of labels. -/
noncomputable def stmts (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (S : Finset Λ) : Finset (Option (Stmt Γ Λ σ)) :=
Finset.insertNone (S.biUnion fun q ↦ stmts₁ (M q))
theorem stmts_trans {M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ} {S : Finset Λ} {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} (h₁ : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂) :
some q₂ ∈ stmts M S → some q₁ ∈ stmts M S := by
simp only [stmts, Finset.mem_insertNone, Finset.mem_biUnion, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq,
forall_eq', exists_imp, and_imp]
exact fun l ls h₂ ↦ ⟨_, ls, stmts₁_trans h₂ h₁⟩
end
variable [Inhabited Λ]
/-- Given a TM2 machine `M` and a set `S` of states, `Supports M S` means that all states in
`S` jump only to other states in `S`. -/
def Supports (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (S : Finset Λ) :=
default ∈ S ∧ ∀ q ∈ S, SupportsStmt S (M q)
theorem stmts_supportsStmt {M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ} {S : Finset Λ} {q : Stmt Γ Λ σ}
(ss : Supports M S) : some q ∈ stmts M S → SupportsStmt S q := by
simp only [stmts, Finset.mem_insertNone, Finset.mem_biUnion, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq,
forall_eq', exists_imp, and_imp]
exact fun l ls h ↦ stmts₁_supportsStmt_mono h (ss.2 _ ls)
variable [DecidableEq K]
theorem step_supports (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) {S : Finset Λ} (ss : Supports M S) :
∀ {c c' : Cfg Γ Λ σ}, c' ∈ step M c → c.l ∈ Finset.insertNone S → c'.l ∈ Finset.insertNone S
| ⟨some l₁, v, T⟩, c', h₁, h₂ => by
replace h₂ := ss.2 _ (Finset.some_mem_insertNone.1 h₂)
simp only [step, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h₁; subst c'
revert h₂; induction M l₁ generalizing v T with intro hs
| branch p q₁' q₂' IH₁ IH₂ =>
unfold stepAux; cases p v
· exact IH₂ _ _ hs.2
· exact IH₁ _ _ hs.1
| goto => exact Finset.some_mem_insertNone.2 (hs _)
| halt => apply Multiset.mem_cons_self
| load _ _ IH | _ _ _ _ IH => exact IH _ _ hs
variable [Inhabited σ]
/-- The initial state of the TM2 model. The input is provided on a designated stack. -/
def init (k : K) (L : List (Γ k)) : Cfg Γ Λ σ :=
⟨some default, default, update (fun _ ↦ []) k L⟩
/-- Evaluates a TM2 program to completion, with the output on the same stack as the input. -/
def eval (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (k : K) (L : List (Γ k)) : Part (List (Γ k)) :=
(Turing.eval (step M) (init k L)).map fun c ↦ c.stk k
end TM2
/-!
## TM2 emulator in TM1
To prove that TM2 computable functions are TM1 computable, we need to reduce each TM2 program to a
TM1 program. So suppose a TM2 program is given. This program has to maintain a whole collection of
stacks, but we have only one tape, so we must "multiplex" them all together. Pictorially, if stack
1 contains `[a, b]` and stack 2 contains `[c, d, e, f]` then the tape looks like this:
```
bottom: ... | _ | T | _ | _ | _ | _ | ...
stack 1: ... | _ | b | a | _ | _ | _ | ...
stack 2: ... | _ | f | e | d | c | _ | ...
```
where a tape element is a vertical slice through the diagram. Here the alphabet is
`Γ' := Bool × ∀ k, Option (Γ k)`, where:
* `bottom : Bool` is marked only in one place, the initial position of the TM, and represents the
tail of all stacks. It is never modified.
* `stk k : Option (Γ k)` is the value of the `k`-th stack, if in range, otherwise `none` (which is
the blank value). Note that the head of the stack is at the far end; this is so that push and pop
don't have to do any shifting.
In "resting" position, the TM is sitting at the position marked `bottom`. For non-stack actions,
it operates in place, but for the stack actions `push`, `peek`, and `pop`, it must shuttle to the
end of the appropriate stack, make its changes, and then return to the bottom. So the states are:
* `normal (l : Λ)`: waiting at `bottom` to execute function `l`
* `go k (s : StAct k) (q : Stmt₂)`: travelling to the right to get to the end of stack `k` in
order to perform stack action `s`, and later continue with executing `q`
* `ret (q : Stmt₂)`: travelling to the left after having performed a stack action, and executing
`q` once we arrive
Because of the shuttling, emulation overhead is `O(n)`, where `n` is the current maximum of the
length of all stacks. Therefore a program that takes `k` steps to run in TM2 takes `O((m+k)k)`
steps to run when emulated in TM1, where `m` is the length of the input.
-/
namespace TM2to1
-- A displaced lemma proved in unnecessary generality
theorem stk_nth_val {K : Type*} {Γ : K → Type*} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))} {k S} (n)
(hL : ListBlank.map (proj k) L = ListBlank.mk (List.map some S).reverse) :
L.nth n k = S.reverse[n]? := by
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, ← List.map_reverse, ListBlank.nth_mk,
List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, List.getElem?_map]
cases S.reverse[n]? <;> rfl
variable (K : Type*)
variable (Γ : K → Type*)
variable {Λ σ : Type*}
/-- The alphabet of the TM2 simulator on TM1 is a marker for the stack bottom,
plus a vector of stack elements for each stack, or none if the stack does not extend this far. -/
def Γ' :=
Bool × ∀ k, Option (Γ k)
variable {K Γ}
instance Γ'.inhabited : Inhabited (Γ' K Γ) :=
⟨⟨false, fun _ ↦ none⟩⟩
instance Γ'.fintype [DecidableEq K] [Fintype K] [∀ k, Fintype (Γ k)] : Fintype (Γ' K Γ) :=
instFintypeProd _ _
/-- The bottom marker is fixed throughout the calculation, so we use the `addBottom` function
to express the program state in terms of a tape with only the stacks themselves. -/
def addBottom (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) : ListBlank (Γ' K Γ) :=
ListBlank.cons (true, L.head) (L.tail.map ⟨Prod.mk false, rfl⟩)
theorem addBottom_map (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) :
(addBottom L).map ⟨Prod.snd, by rfl⟩ = L := by
simp only [addBottom, ListBlank.map_cons]
convert ListBlank.cons_head_tail L
generalize ListBlank.tail L = L'
refine L'.induction_on fun l ↦ ?_; simp
theorem addBottom_modifyNth (f : (∀ k, Option (Γ k)) → ∀ k, Option (Γ k))
(L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
(addBottom L).modifyNth (fun a ↦ (a.1, f a.2)) n = addBottom (L.modifyNth f n) := by
cases n <;>
simp only [addBottom, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.modifyNth, ListBlank.tail_cons]
congr; symm; apply ListBlank.map_modifyNth; intro; rfl
theorem addBottom_nth_snd (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
((addBottom L).nth n).2 = L.nth n := by
conv => rhs; rw [← addBottom_map L, ListBlank.nth_map]
theorem addBottom_nth_succ_fst (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
((addBottom L).nth (n + 1)).1 = false := by
rw [ListBlank.nth_succ, addBottom, ListBlank.tail_cons, ListBlank.nth_map]
theorem addBottom_head_fst (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) : (addBottom L).head.1 = true := by
rw [addBottom, ListBlank.head_cons]
variable (K Γ σ) in
/-- A stack action is a command that interacts with the top of a stack. Our default position
is at the bottom of all the stacks, so we have to hold on to this action while going to the end
to modify the stack. -/
inductive StAct (k : K)
| push : (σ → Γ k) → StAct k
| peek : (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → StAct k
| pop : (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → StAct k
instance StAct.inhabited {k : K} : Inhabited (StAct K Γ σ k) :=
⟨StAct.peek fun s _ ↦ s⟩
section
open StAct
/-- The TM2 statement corresponding to a stack action. -/
def stRun {k : K} : StAct K Γ σ k → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ
| push f => TM2.Stmt.push k f
| peek f => TM2.Stmt.peek k f
| pop f => TM2.Stmt.pop k f
/-- The effect of a stack action on the local variables, given the value of the stack. -/
def stVar {k : K} (v : σ) (l : List (Γ k)) : StAct K Γ σ k → σ
| push _ => v
| peek f => f v l.head?
| pop f => f v l.head?
/-- The effect of a stack action on the stack. -/
def stWrite {k : K} (v : σ) (l : List (Γ k)) : StAct K Γ σ k → List (Γ k)
| push f => f v :: l
| peek _ => l
| pop _ => l.tail
/-- We have partitioned the TM2 statements into "stack actions", which require going to the end
of the stack, and all other actions, which do not. This is a modified recursor which lumps the
stack actions into one. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def stmtStRec.{l} {motive : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Sort l}
(run : ∀ (k) (s : StAct K Γ σ k) (q) (_ : motive q), motive (stRun s q))
(load : ∀ (a q) (_ : motive q), motive (TM2.Stmt.load a q))
(branch : ∀ (p q₁ q₂) (_ : motive q₁) (_ : motive q₂), motive (TM2.Stmt.branch p q₁ q₂))
(goto : ∀ l, motive (TM2.Stmt.goto l)) (halt : motive TM2.Stmt.halt) : ∀ n, motive n
| TM2.Stmt.push _ f q => run _ (push f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.peek _ f q => run _ (peek f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.pop _ f q => run _ (pop f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.load _ q => load _ _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.branch _ q₁ q₂ =>
branch _ _ _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q₁) (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q₂)
| TM2.Stmt.goto _ => goto _
| TM2.Stmt.halt => halt
theorem supports_run (S : Finset Λ) {k : K} (s : StAct K Γ σ k) (q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ) :
TM2.SupportsStmt S (stRun s q) ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S q := by
cases s <;> rfl
end
variable (K Γ Λ σ)
/-- The machine states of the TM2 emulator. We can either be in a normal state when waiting for the
next TM2 action, or we can be in the "go" and "return" states to go to the top of the stack and
return to the bottom, respectively. -/
inductive Λ'
| normal : Λ → Λ'
| go (k : K) : StAct K Γ σ k → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Λ'
| ret : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Λ'
variable {K Γ Λ σ}
open Λ'
instance Λ'.inhabited [Inhabited Λ] : Inhabited (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨normal default⟩
open TM1.Stmt
section
variable [DecidableEq K]
/-- The program corresponding to state transitions at the end of a stack. Here we start out just
after the top of the stack, and should end just after the new top of the stack. -/
def trStAct {k : K} (q : TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ) :
StAct K Γ σ k → TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ
| StAct.push f => (write fun a s ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k <| some <| f s)) <| move Dir.right q
| StAct.peek f => move Dir.left <| (load fun a s ↦ f s (a.2 k)) <| move Dir.right q
| StAct.pop f =>
branch (fun a _ ↦ a.1) (load (fun _ s ↦ f s none) q)
(move Dir.left <|
(load fun a s ↦ f s (a.2 k)) <| write (fun a _ ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k none)) q)
/-- The initial state for the TM2 emulator, given an initial TM2 state. All stacks start out empty
except for the input stack, and the stack bottom mark is set at the head. -/
def trInit (k : K) (L : List (Γ k)) : List (Γ' K Γ) :=
let L' : List (Γ' K Γ) := L.reverse.map fun a ↦ (false, update (fun _ ↦ none) k (some a))
(true, L'.headI.2) :: L'.tail
theorem step_run {k : K} (q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ) (v : σ) (S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)) : ∀ s : StAct K Γ σ k,
TM2.stepAux (stRun s q) v S = TM2.stepAux q (stVar v (S k) s) (update S k (stWrite v (S k) s))
| StAct.push _ => rfl
| StAct.peek f => by unfold stWrite; rw [Function.update_eq_self]; rfl
| StAct.pop _ => rfl
end
/-- The translation of TM2 statements to TM1 statements. regular actions have direct equivalents,
but stack actions are deferred by going to the corresponding `go` state, so that we can find the
appropriate stack top. -/
def trNormal : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ
| TM2.Stmt.push k f q => goto fun _ _ ↦ go k (StAct.push f) q
| TM2.Stmt.peek k f q => goto fun _ _ ↦ go k (StAct.peek f) q
| TM2.Stmt.pop k f q => goto fun _ _ ↦ go k (StAct.pop f) q
| TM2.Stmt.load a q => load (fun _ ↦ a) (trNormal q)
| TM2.Stmt.branch f q₁ q₂ => branch (fun _ ↦ f) (trNormal q₁) (trNormal q₂)
| TM2.Stmt.goto l => goto fun _ s ↦ normal (l s)
| TM2.Stmt.halt => halt
theorem trNormal_run {k : K} (s : StAct K Γ σ k) (q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ) :
trNormal (stRun s q) = goto fun _ _ ↦ go k s q := by
cases s <;> rfl
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of machine states accessible from an initial TM2 statement. -/
noncomputable def trStmts₁ : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Finset (Λ' K Γ Λ σ)
| TM2.Stmt.push k f q => {go k (StAct.push f) q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.peek k f q => {go k (StAct.peek f) q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.pop k f q => {go k (StAct.pop f) q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.load _ q => trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.branch _ q₁ q₂ => trStmts₁ q₁ ∪ trStmts₁ q₂
| _ => ∅
theorem trStmts₁_run {k : K} {s : StAct K Γ σ k} {q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ} :
open scoped Classical in
trStmts₁ (stRun s q) = {go k s q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q := by
cases s <;> simp only [trStmts₁, stRun]
theorem tr_respects_aux₂ [DecidableEq K] {k : K} {q : TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ} {v : σ}
{S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))}
(hL : ∀ k, L.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) (o : StAct K Γ σ k) :
let v' := stVar v (S k) o
let Sk' := stWrite v (S k) o
let S' := update S k Sk'
∃ L' : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k)),
(∀ k, L'.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S' k).map some).reverse) ∧
TM1.stepAux (trStAct q o) v
((Tape.move Dir.right)^[(S k).length] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L))) =
TM1.stepAux q v' ((Tape.move Dir.right)^[(S' k).length] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L'))) := by
simp only [Function.update_self]; cases o with simp only [stWrite, stVar, trStAct, TM1.stepAux]
| push f =>
have := Tape.write_move_right_n fun a : Γ' K Γ ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k (some (f v)))
refine
⟨_, fun k' ↦ ?_, by
-- Porting note: `rw [...]` to `erw [...]; rfl`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5164
rw [Tape.move_right_n_head, List.length, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, this]
erw [addBottom_modifyNth fun a ↦ update a k (some (f v))]
rw [Nat.add_one, iterate_succ']
rfl⟩
refine ListBlank.ext fun i ↦ ?_
rw [ListBlank.nth_map, ListBlank.nth_modifyNth, proj, PointedMap.mk_val]
by_cases h' : k' = k
· subst k'
split_ifs with h
<;> simp only [List.reverse_cons, Function.update_self, ListBlank.nth_mk, List.map]
· rw [List.getI_eq_getElem _, List.getElem_append_right] <;>
simp only [List.length_append, List.length_reverse, List.length_map, ← h,
Nat.sub_self, List.length_singleton, List.getElem_singleton,
le_refl, Nat.lt_succ_self]
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, ListBlank.nth_mk]
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne h with h | h
· rw [List.getI_append]
simpa only [List.length_map, List.length_reverse] using h
· rw [gt_iff_lt] at h
rw [List.getI_eq_default, List.getI_eq_default] <;>
simp only [Nat.add_one_le_iff, h, List.length, le_of_lt, List.length_reverse,
List.length_append, List.length_map]
· split_ifs <;> rw [Function.update_of_ne h', ← proj_map_nth, hL]
rw [Function.update_of_ne h']
| peek f =>
rw [Function.update_eq_self]
use L, hL; rw [Tape.move_left_right]; congr
cases e : S k; · rfl
rw [List.length_cons, iterate_succ', Function.comp, Tape.move_right_left,
Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, addBottom_nth_snd, stk_nth_val _ (hL k), e,
List.reverse_cons, ← List.length_reverse, List.getElem?_concat_length]
rfl
| pop f =>
rcases e : S k with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp only [Tape.mk'_head, ListBlank.head_cons, Tape.move_left_mk', List.length,
Tape.write_mk', List.head?, iterate_zero_apply, List.tail_nil]
rw [← e, Function.update_eq_self]
exact ⟨L, hL, by rw [addBottom_head_fst, cond]⟩
· refine
⟨_, fun k' ↦ ?_, by
erw [List.length_cons, Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, addBottom_nth_succ_fst,
cond_false, iterate_succ', Function.comp, Tape.move_right_left, Tape.move_right_n_head,
Tape.mk'_nth_nat, Tape.write_move_right_n fun a : Γ' K Γ ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k none),
addBottom_modifyNth fun a ↦ update a k none, addBottom_nth_snd,
stk_nth_val _ (hL k), e,
show (List.cons hd tl).reverse[tl.length]? = some hd by
rw [List.reverse_cons, ← List.length_reverse, List.getElem?_concat_length],
List.head?, List.tail]⟩
refine ListBlank.ext fun i ↦ ?_
rw [ListBlank.nth_map, ListBlank.nth_modifyNth, proj, PointedMap.mk_val]
by_cases h' : k' = k
· subst k'
split_ifs with h <;> simp only [Function.update_self, ListBlank.nth_mk, List.tail]
· rw [List.getI_eq_default]
· rfl
rw [h, List.length_reverse, List.length_map]
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, ListBlank.nth_mk, e, List.map, List.reverse_cons]
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne h with h | h
· rw [List.getI_append]
simpa only [List.length_map, List.length_reverse] using h
· rw [gt_iff_lt] at h
rw [List.getI_eq_default, List.getI_eq_default] <;>
simp only [Nat.add_one_le_iff, h, List.length, le_of_lt, List.length_reverse,
List.length_append, List.length_map]
· split_ifs <;> rw [Function.update_of_ne h', ← proj_map_nth, hL]
rw [Function.update_of_ne h']
end
variable [DecidableEq K]
variable (M : Λ → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ)
/-- The TM2 emulator machine states written as a TM1 program.
This handles the `go` and `ret` states, which shuttle to and from a stack top. -/
def tr : Λ' K Γ Λ σ → TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ
| normal q => trNormal (M q)
| go k s q =>
branch (fun a _ ↦ (a.2 k).isNone) (trStAct (goto fun _ _ ↦ ret q) s)
(move Dir.right <| goto fun _ _ ↦ go k s q)
| ret q => branch (fun a _ ↦ a.1) (trNormal q) (move Dir.left <| goto fun _ _ ↦ ret q)
/-- The relation between TM2 configurations and TM1 configurations of the TM2 emulator. -/
inductive TrCfg : TM2.Cfg Γ Λ σ → TM1.Cfg (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ → Prop
| mk {q : Option Λ} {v : σ} {S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)} (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) :
(∀ k, L.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) →
TrCfg ⟨q, v, S⟩ ⟨q.map normal, v, Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L)⟩
theorem tr_respects_aux₁ {k} (o q v) {S : List (Γ k)} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))}
(hL : L.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk (S.map some).reverse) (n) (H : n ≤ S.length) :
Reaches₀ (TM1.step (tr M)) ⟨some (go k o q), v, Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L)⟩
⟨some (go k o q), v, (Tape.move Dir.right)^[n] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L))⟩ := by
induction' n with n IH; · rfl
apply (IH (le_of_lt H)).tail
rw [iterate_succ_apply']
simp only [TM1.step, TM1.stepAux, tr, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, Tape.move_right_n_head,
addBottom_nth_snd, Option.mem_def]
rw [stk_nth_val _ hL, List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
· rfl
· rwa [List.length_reverse]
theorem tr_respects_aux₃ {q v} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))} (n) : Reaches₀ (TM1.step (tr M))
⟨some (ret q), v, (Tape.move Dir.right)^[n] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L))⟩
⟨some (ret q), v, Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L)⟩ := by
induction' n with n IH; · rfl
refine Reaches₀.head ?_ IH
simp only [Option.mem_def, TM1.step]
rw [Option.some_inj, tr, TM1.stepAux, Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat,
addBottom_nth_succ_fst, TM1.stepAux, iterate_succ', Function.comp_apply, Tape.move_right_left]
rfl
theorem tr_respects_aux {q v T k} {S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)}
(hT : ∀ k, ListBlank.map (proj k) T = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse)
(o : StAct K Γ σ k)
(IH : ∀ {v : σ} {S : ∀ k : K, List (Γ k)} {T : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))},
(∀ k, ListBlank.map (proj k) T = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) →
∃ b, TrCfg (TM2.stepAux q v S) b ∧
Reaches (TM1.step (tr M)) (TM1.stepAux (trNormal q) v (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom T))) b) :
∃ b, TrCfg (TM2.stepAux (stRun o q) v S) b ∧ Reaches (TM1.step (tr M))
(TM1.stepAux (trNormal (stRun o q)) v (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom T))) b := by
simp only [trNormal_run, step_run]
have hgo := tr_respects_aux₁ M o q v (hT k) _ le_rfl
obtain ⟨T', hT', hrun⟩ := tr_respects_aux₂ (Λ := Λ) hT o
have := hgo.tail' rfl
rw [tr, TM1.stepAux, Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, addBottom_nth_snd,
stk_nth_val _ (hT k), List.getElem?_eq_none (le_of_eq List.length_reverse),
Option.isNone, cond, hrun, TM1.stepAux] at this
obtain ⟨c, gc, rc⟩ := IH hT'
refine ⟨c, gc, (this.to₀.trans (tr_respects_aux₃ M _) c (TransGen.head' rfl ?_)).to_reflTransGen⟩
rw [tr, TM1.stepAux, Tape.mk'_head, addBottom_head_fst]
exact rc
attribute [local simp] Respects TM2.step TM2.stepAux trNormal
theorem tr_respects : Respects (TM2.step M) (TM1.step (tr M)) TrCfg := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
intro c₁ c₂ h
obtain @⟨- | l, v, S, L, hT⟩ := h; · constructor
rsuffices ⟨b, c, r⟩ : ∃ b, _ ∧ Reaches (TM1.step (tr M)) _ _
· exact ⟨b, c, TransGen.head' rfl r⟩
simp only [tr]
generalize M l = N
induction N using stmtStRec generalizing v S L hT with
| run k s q IH => exact tr_respects_aux M hT s @IH
| load a _ IH => exact IH _ hT
| branch p q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ =>
unfold TM2.stepAux trNormal TM1.stepAux
beta_reduce
cases p v <;> [exact IH₂ _ hT; exact IH₁ _ hT]
| goto => exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hT⟩, ReflTransGen.refl⟩
| halt => exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hT⟩, ReflTransGen.refl⟩
section
variable [Inhabited Λ] [Inhabited σ]
theorem trCfg_init (k) (L : List (Γ k)) : TrCfg (TM2.init k L)
(TM1.init (trInit k L) : TM1.Cfg (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ) := by
rw [(_ : TM1.init _ = _)]
· refine ⟨ListBlank.mk (L.reverse.map fun a ↦ update default k (some a)), fun k' ↦ ?_⟩
refine ListBlank.ext fun i ↦ ?_
rw [ListBlank.map_mk, ListBlank.nth_mk, List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, List.map_map]
have : ((proj k').f ∘ fun a => update (β := fun k => Option (Γ k)) default k (some a))
= fun a => (proj k').f (update (β := fun k => Option (Γ k)) default k (some a)) := rfl
rw [this, List.getElem?_map, proj, PointedMap.mk_val]
simp only []
by_cases h : k' = k
· subst k'
simp only [Function.update_self]
rw [ListBlank.nth_mk, List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, ← List.map_reverse, List.getElem?_map]
· simp only [Function.update_of_ne h]
rw [ListBlank.nth_mk, List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, List.map, List.reverse_nil]
cases L.reverse[i]? <;> rfl
· rw [trInit, TM1.init]
congr <;> cases L.reverse <;> try rfl
simp only [List.map_map, List.tail_cons, List.map]
rfl
theorem tr_eval_dom (k) (L : List (Γ k)) :
(TM1.eval (tr M) (trInit k L)).Dom ↔ (TM2.eval M k L).Dom :=
Turing.tr_eval_dom (tr_respects M) (trCfg_init k L)
theorem tr_eval (k) (L : List (Γ k)) {L₁ L₂} (H₁ : L₁ ∈ TM1.eval (tr M) (trInit k L))
(H₂ : L₂ ∈ TM2.eval M k L) :
∃ (S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)) (L' : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))),
addBottom L' = L₁ ∧
(∀ k, L'.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) ∧ S k = L₂ := by
obtain ⟨c₁, h₁, rfl⟩ := (Part.mem_map_iff _).1 H₁
obtain ⟨c₂, h₂, rfl⟩ := (Part.mem_map_iff _).1 H₂
obtain ⟨_, ⟨L', hT⟩, h₃⟩ := Turing.tr_eval (tr_respects M) (trCfg_init k L) h₂
cases Part.mem_unique h₁ h₃
exact ⟨_, L', by simp only [Tape.mk'_right₀], hT, rfl⟩
end
section
variable [Inhabited Λ]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The support of a set of TM2 states in the TM2 emulator. -/
noncomputable def trSupp (S : Finset Λ) : Finset (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) :=
S.biUnion fun l ↦ insert (normal l) (trStmts₁ (M l))
open scoped Classical in
theorem tr_supports {S} (ss : TM2.Supports M S) : TM1.Supports (tr M) (trSupp M S) :=
⟨Finset.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨_, ss.1, Finset.mem_insert.2 <| Or.inl rfl⟩, fun l' h ↦ by
suffices ∀ (q) (_ : TM2.SupportsStmt S q) (_ : ∀ x ∈ trStmts₁ q, x ∈ trSupp M S),
TM1.SupportsStmt (trSupp M S) (trNormal q) ∧
∀ l' ∈ trStmts₁ q, TM1.SupportsStmt (trSupp M S) (tr M l') by
rcases Finset.mem_biUnion.1 h with ⟨l, lS, h⟩
have :=
this _ (ss.2 l lS) fun x hx ↦ Finset.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨_, lS, Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hx⟩
rcases Finset.mem_insert.1 h with (rfl | h) <;> [exact this.1; exact this.2 _ h]
clear h l'
refine stmtStRec ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro _ s _ IH ss' sub -- stack op
rw [TM2to1.supports_run] at ss'
simp only [TM2to1.trStmts₁_run, Finset.mem_union, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
at sub
have hgo := sub _ (Or.inl <| Or.inl rfl)
have hret := sub _ (Or.inl <| Or.inr rfl)
obtain ⟨IH₁, IH₂⟩ := IH ss' fun x hx ↦ sub x <| Or.inr hx
refine ⟨by simp only [trNormal_run, TM1.SupportsStmt]; intros; exact hgo, fun l h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [trStmts₁_run] at h
simp only [TM2to1.trStmts₁_run, Finset.mem_union, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
at h
rcases h with (⟨rfl | rfl⟩ | h)
· cases s
· exact ⟨fun _ _ ↦ hret, fun _ _ ↦ hgo⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ _ ↦ hret, fun _ _ ↦ hgo⟩
· exact ⟨⟨fun _ _ ↦ hret, fun _ _ ↦ hret⟩, fun _ _ ↦ hgo⟩
· unfold TM1.SupportsStmt TM2to1.tr
exact ⟨IH₁, fun _ _ ↦ hret⟩
· exact IH₂ _ h
· intro _ _ IH ss' sub -- load
unfold TM2to1.trStmts₁ at sub ⊢
exact IH ss' sub
· intro _ _ _ IH₁ IH₂ ss' sub -- branch
unfold TM2to1.trStmts₁ at sub
obtain ⟨IH₁₁, IH₁₂⟩ := IH₁ ss'.1 fun x hx ↦ sub x <| Finset.mem_union_left _ hx
obtain ⟨IH₂₁, IH₂₂⟩ := IH₂ ss'.2 fun x hx ↦ sub x <| Finset.mem_union_right _ hx
refine ⟨⟨IH₁₁, IH₂₁⟩, fun l h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [trStmts₁] at h
rcases Finset.mem_union.1 h with (h | h) <;> [exact IH₁₂ _ h; exact IH₂₂ _ h]
· intro _ ss' _ -- goto
simp only [trStmts₁, Finset.not_mem_empty]; refine ⟨?_, fun _ ↦ False.elim⟩
exact fun _ v ↦ Finset.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨_, ss' v, Finset.mem_insert_self _ _⟩
· intro _ _ -- halt
simp only [trStmts₁, Finset.not_mem_empty]
exact ⟨trivial, fun _ ↦ False.elim⟩⟩
end
end TM2to1
end Turing
| Mathlib/Computability/TuringMachine.lean | 1,719 | 1,721 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
/-!
# Matrices
This file contains basic results on matrices including bundled versions of matrix operators.
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
universe u u' v w
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
section
variable (R)
/-- This is `Matrix.of` bundled as a linear equivalence. -/
def ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α where
__ := ofAddEquiv
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑(ofLinearEquiv _ : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α) = of := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑((ofLinearEquiv _).symm : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] (m → n → α)) = of.symm := rfl
end
theorem sum_apply [AddCommMonoid α] (i : m) (j : n) (s : Finset β) (g : β → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ c ∈ s, g c) i j = ∑ c ∈ s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
variable {n α R}
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
lemma zero_le_one_elem [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i j : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i j := by
by_cases hi : i = j
· subst hi
simp
· simp [hi]
lemma zero_le_one_row [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i :=
zero_le_one_elem i
end One
end Diagonal
section Diag
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : Matrix n n α →+ n → α where
toFun := diag
map_zero' := diag_zero
map_add' := diag_add
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Matrix n n α →ₗ[R] n → α :=
{ diagAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diag_smul }
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diag_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix n n α)) : diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) l
@[simp]
theorem diag_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) s
@[simp]
theorem diag_sum {ι} [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) f s
end Diag
open Matrix
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
end AddCommMonoid
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
variable (α n)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalRingHom [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] : (n → α) →+* Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
map_one' := diagonal_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ => (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem diagonal_pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonalRingHom n α) v k).symm
/-- The ring homomorphism `α →+* Matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] : α →+* Matrix n n α :=
(diagonalRingHom n α).comp <| Pi.constRingHom n α
section Scalar
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem scalar_apply (a : α) : scalar n a = diagonal fun _ => a :=
rfl
theorem scalar_inj [Nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
(diagonal_injective.comp Function.const_injective).eq_iff
theorem scalar_commute_iff {r : α} {M : Matrix n n α} :
Commute (scalar n r) M ↔ r • M = MulOpposite.op r • M := by
simp_rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, scalar_apply, ← smul_eq_diagonal_mul, ← op_smul_eq_mul_diagonal]
theorem scalar_commute (r : α) (hr : ∀ r', Commute r r') (M : Matrix n n α) :
Commute (scalar n r) M := scalar_commute_iff.2 <| ext fun _ _ => hr _
end Scalar
end Semiring
section Algebra
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β]
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (Matrix n n α) where
algebraMap := (Matrix.scalar n).comp (algebraMap R α)
commutes' _ _ := scalar_commute _ (fun _ => Algebra.commutes _ _) _
smul_def' r x := by ext; simp [Matrix.scalar, Algebra.smul_def r]
theorem algebraMap_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebraMap R α r else 0 := by
dsimp [algebraMap, Algebra.algebraMap, Matrix.scalar]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, Matrix.one_apply_ne]
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebraMap R (n → α) r) := rfl
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonalRingHom :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) = (diagonalRingHom n α).comp (algebraMap R _) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_algebraMap (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebraMap R α r) = algebraMap R β r) :
(algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r).map f = algebraMap R (Matrix n n β) r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf]
simp [hf₂]
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAlgHom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalRingHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
commutes' := fun r => (algebraMap_eq_diagonal r).symm }
end Algebra
section AddHom
variable [Add α]
variable (R α) in
/-- Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def entryAddHom (i : m) (j : n) : AddHom (Matrix m n α) α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddHom _ i)).comp
(AddHomClass.toAddHom ofAddEquiv.symm) :=
rfl
end AddHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive monoid homomorphism. Note this cannot be upgraded to
a ring homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryAddMonoidHom (i : m) (j : n) : Matrix m n α →+ α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddMonoidHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddMonoidHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i)).comp
(AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom ofAddEquiv.symm) := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma evalAddMonoidHom_comp_diagAddMonoidHom (i : m) :
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i).comp (diagAddMonoidHom m α) = entryAddMonoidHom α i i := by
simp [AddMonoidHom.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryAddMonoidHom α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as a linear map. Note this cannot be upgraded to an algebra
homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryLinearMap (i : m) (j : n) :
Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryLinearMap_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryLinearMap R α i j =
LinearMap.proj j ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ (ofLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_comp_diagLinearMap (i : m) :
LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ diagLinearMap m R α = entryLinearMap R α i i := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddMonoidHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : _ →+ _) = entryAddMonoidHom α i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end LinearMap
end Matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `Matrix.map`
-/
namespace Equiv
/-- The `Equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `Equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ β) : Matrix m n α ≃ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
invFun M := M.map f.symm
left_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (Equiv.refl α).mapMatrix = Equiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α] [AddZeroClass β] [AddZeroClass γ]
/-- The `AddMonoidHom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddMonoidHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) : Matrix m n α →+ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_zero' := Matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AddMonoidHom.id α).mapMatrix = AddMonoidHom.id (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddMonoidHom β i j).comp f.mapMatrix = f.comp (entryAddMonoidHom α i j) := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
namespace AddEquiv
variable [Add α] [Add β] [Add γ]
/-- The `AddEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f (map_add f) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (AddEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = AddEquiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+ β) (g : β ≃+ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddHom β i j).comp (AddHomClass.toAddHom f.mapMatrix) =
(f : AddHom α β).comp (entryAddHom _ i j) := rfl
end AddEquiv
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearMap` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearMap` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
map_smul' r := Matrix.map_smul f r (f.map_smul r)
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : LinearMap.id.mapMatrix = (LinearMap.id : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₗ[R] γ) (g : α →ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix = f ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix,
f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (LinearEquiv.refl R α).mapMatrix = LinearEquiv.refl R (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₗ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mapMatrix_toLinearMap (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
(f.mapMatrix : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β).toLinearMap = f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix.toLinearMap =
f.toLinearMap ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := by
simp only [mapMatrix_toLinearMap, LinearMap.entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix]
end LinearEquiv
namespace RingHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+* β) : Matrix m m α →+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Matrix.map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (RingHom.id α).mapMatrix = RingHom.id (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+* γ) (g : α →+* β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →+* _) :=
rfl
end RingHom
namespace RingEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+* β) : Matrix m m α ≃+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix,
f.toAddEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (RingEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = RingEquiv.refl (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+* β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃+* _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+* β) (g : β ≃+* γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃+* _) :=
rfl
open MulOpposite in
/--
For any ring `R`, we have ring isomorphism `Matₙₓₙ(Rᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose.
-/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun M := op (M.transpose.map unop)
invFun M := M.unop.transpose.map op
left_inv _ := by aesop
right_inv _ := by aesop
map_mul' _ _ := unop_injective <| by ext; simp [transpose, mul_apply]
map_add' _ _ := by aesop
end RingEquiv
namespace AlgHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
commutes' := fun r => Matrix.map_algebraMap r f (map_zero _) (f.commutes r) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AlgHom.id R α).mapMatrix = AlgHom.id R (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₐ[R] γ) (g : α →ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAlgHom.mapMatrix,
f.toRingEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : AlgEquiv.refl.mapMatrix = (AlgEquiv.refl : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₐ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
/-- For any algebra `α` over a ring `R`, we have an `R`-algebra isomorphism
`Matₙₓₙ(αᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose. If `α` is commutative,
we can get rid of the `ᵒᵖ` in the left-hand side, see `Matrix.transposeAlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!] def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
__ := RingEquiv.mopMatrix
commutes' _ := MulOpposite.unop_injective <| by
ext; simp [algebraMap_matrix_apply, eq_comm, apply_ite MulOpposite.unop]
end AlgEquiv
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Transpose
open Matrix
variable (m n α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AddEquiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeAddEquiv [Add α] : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix n m α where
toFun := transpose
invFun := transpose
left_inv := transpose_transpose
right_inv := transpose_transpose
map_add' := transpose_add
@[simp]
theorem transposeAddEquiv_symm [Add α] : (transposeAddEquiv m n α).symm = transposeAddEquiv n m α :=
rfl
variable {m n α}
theorem transpose_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᵀ = (l.map transpose).sum :=
map_list_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) l
theorem transpose_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᵀ = (s.map transpose).sum :=
(transposeAddEquiv m n α).toAddMonoidHom.map_multiset_sum s
theorem transpose_sum [AddCommMonoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (M : ι → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ i ∈ s, M i)ᵀ = ∑ i ∈ s, (M i)ᵀ :=
map_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) _ s
variable (m n R α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m α :=
{ transposeAddEquiv m n α with map_smul' := transpose_smul }
@[simp]
theorem transposeLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
(transposeLinearEquiv m n R α).symm = transposeLinearEquiv n m R α :=
rfl
variable {m n R α}
variable (m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `RingEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeRingEquiv [AddCommMonoid α] [CommSemigroup α] [Fintype m] :
Matrix m m α ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
invFun := fun M => M.unopᵀ
map_mul' := fun M N =>
(congr_arg MulOpposite.op (transpose_mul M N)).trans (MulOpposite.op_mul _ _)
left_inv := fun M => transpose_transpose M
right_inv := fun M => MulOpposite.unop_injective <| transpose_transpose M.unop }
variable {m α}
@[simp]
theorem transpose_pow [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix m m α) (k : ℕ) :
(M ^ k)ᵀ = Mᵀ ^ k :=
MulOpposite.op_injective <| map_pow (transposeRingEquiv m α) M k
theorem transpose_list_prod [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (l : List (Matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᵀ = (l.map transpose).reverse.prod :=
(transposeRingEquiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
variable (R m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeAlgEquiv [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Algebra R α] :
Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv,
transposeRingEquiv m α with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
commutes' := fun r => by
simp only [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_transpose, MulOpposite.algebraMap_apply] }
variable {R m α}
end Transpose
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 2,881 | 2,883 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.Constructors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalProperties.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RingHom.Locally
/-!
# Properties of morphisms from properties of ring homs.
We provide the basic framework for talking about properties of morphisms that come from properties
of ring homs. For `P` a property of ring homs, we have two ways of defining a property of scheme
morphisms:
Let `f : X ⟶ Y`,
- `targetAffineLocally (affineAnd P)`: the preimage of an affine open `U = Spec A` is affine
(`= Spec B`) and `A ⟶ B` satisfies `P`. (in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/AffineAnd.lean`)
- `affineLocally P`: For each pair of affine open `U = Spec A ⊆ X` and `V = Spec B ⊆ f ⁻¹' U`,
the ring hom `A ⟶ B` satisfies `P`.
For these notions to be well defined, we require `P` be a sufficient local property. For the former,
`P` should be local on the source (`RingHom.RespectsIso P`, `RingHom.LocalizationPreserves P`,
`RingHom.OfLocalizationSpan`), and `targetAffineLocally (affine_and P)` will be local on
the target.
For the latter `P` should be local on the target (`RingHom.PropertyIsLocal P`), and
`affineLocally P` will be local on both the source and the target.
We also provide the following interface:
## `HasRingHomProperty`
`HasRingHomProperty P Q` is a type class asserting that `P` is local at the target and the source,
and for `f : Spec B ⟶ Spec A`, it is equivalent to the ring hom property `Q` on `Γ(f)`.
For `HasRingHomProperty P Q` and `f : X ⟶ Y`, we provide these API lemmas:
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_appLE`:
`P f` if and only if `Q (f.appLE U V _)` for all affine `U : Opens Y` and `V : Opens X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_of_source_openCover`:
If `Y` is affine, `P f ↔ ∀ i, Q ((𝒰.map i ≫ f).appTop)` for an affine open cover `𝒰` of `X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_of_isAffine`:
If `X` and `Y` are affine, then `P f ↔ Q (f.appTop)`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.Spec_iff`:
`P (Spec.map φ) ↔ Q φ`
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_of_iSup_eq_top`:
If `Y` is affine, `P f ↔ ∀ i, Q (f.appLE ⊤ (U i) _)` for a family `U` of affine opens of `X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.of_isOpenImmersion`:
If `f` is an open immersion then `P f`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.isStableUnderBaseChange`:
If `Q` is stable under base change, then so is `P`.
We also provide the instances `P.IsMultiplicative`, `P.IsStableUnderComposition`,
`IsLocalAtTarget P`, `IsLocalAtSource P`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
universe u
open CategoryTheory Opposite TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory.Limits AlgebraicGeometry
namespace RingHom
variable (P : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop)
theorem IsStableUnderBaseChange.pullback_fst_appTop
(hP : IsStableUnderBaseChange P) (hP' : RespectsIso P)
{X Y S : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] [IsAffine S] (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S)
(H : P g.appTop.hom) : P (pullback.fst f g).appTop.hom := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11224): change `rw` to `erw`
erw [← PreservesPullback.iso_inv_fst AffineScheme.forgetToScheme (AffineScheme.ofHom f)
(AffineScheme.ofHom g)]
rw [Scheme.comp_appTop, CommRingCat.hom_comp, hP'.cancel_right_isIso,
AffineScheme.forgetToScheme_map]
have := congr_arg Quiver.Hom.unop
(PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst AffineScheme.Γ.rightOp (AffineScheme.ofHom f)
(AffineScheme.ofHom g))
simp only [AffineScheme.Γ, Functor.rightOp_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Functor.op_obj, unop_comp,
AffineScheme.forgetToScheme_obj, Scheme.Γ_obj, Functor.rightOp_map, Functor.comp_map,
Functor.op_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, AffineScheme.forgetToScheme_map, Scheme.Γ_map] at this
rw [← this, CommRingCat.hom_comp, hP'.cancel_right_isIso, ← pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inl_hom,
CommRingCat.hom_comp, hP'.cancel_right_isIso]
exact hP.pushout_inl _ hP' _ _ H
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")]
alias IsStableUnderBaseChange.pullback_fst_app_top :=
IsStableUnderBaseChange.pullback_fst_appTop
end RingHom
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
section affineLocally
variable (P : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop)
/-- For `P` a property of ring homomorphisms, `sourceAffineLocally P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y`
whenever `P` holds for the restriction of `f` on every affine open subset of `X`. -/
def sourceAffineLocally : AffineTargetMorphismProperty := fun X _ f _ =>
∀ U : X.affineOpens, P (f.appLE ⊤ U le_top).hom
/-- For `P` a property of ring homomorphisms, `affineLocally P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y` if for each
affine open `U = Spec A ⊆ Y` and `V = Spec B ⊆ f ⁻¹' U`, the ring hom `A ⟶ B` satisfies `P`.
Also see `affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le`. -/
abbrev affineLocally : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u} :=
targetAffineLocally (sourceAffineLocally P)
theorem sourceAffineLocally_respectsIso (h₁ : RingHom.RespectsIso P) :
(sourceAffineLocally P).toProperty.RespectsIso := by
apply AffineTargetMorphismProperty.respectsIso_mk
· introv H U
have : IsIso (e.hom.appLE (e.hom ''ᵁ U) U.1 (e.hom.preimage_image_eq _).ge) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsIso (e.hom.app _ ≫
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (e.hom.preimage_image_eq _).symm).op))
rw [← Scheme.appLE_comp_appLE _ _ ⊤ (e.hom ''ᵁ U) U.1 le_top (e.hom.preimage_image_eq _).ge,
CommRingCat.hom_comp, h₁.cancel_right_isIso]
exact H ⟨_, U.prop.image_of_isOpenImmersion e.hom⟩
· introv H U
rw [Scheme.comp_appLE, CommRingCat.hom_comp, h₁.cancel_left_isIso]
exact H U
theorem affineLocally_respectsIso (h : RingHom.RespectsIso P) : (affineLocally P).RespectsIso :=
letI := sourceAffineLocally_respectsIso P h
inferInstance
open Scheme in
theorem sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
(U : Y.Opens) (hU : IsAffineOpen U) :
@sourceAffineLocally P _ _ (f ∣_ U) hU ↔
∀ (V : X.affineOpens) (e : V.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U), P (f.appLE U V e).hom := by
dsimp only [sourceAffineLocally]
simp only [morphismRestrict_appLE]
rw [(affineOpensRestrict (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)).forall_congr_left, Subtype.forall]
refine forall₂_congr fun V h ↦ ?_
have := (affineOpensRestrict (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)).apply_symm_apply ⟨V, h⟩
exact f.appLE_congr _ (Opens.ι_image_top _) congr($(this).1.1) (fun f => P f.hom)
theorem affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
affineLocally.{u} P f ↔
∀ (U : Y.affineOpens) (V : X.affineOpens) (e : V.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U.1), P (f.appLE U V e).hom :=
forall_congr' fun U ↦ sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict P f U U.2
theorem sourceAffineLocally_isLocal (h₁ : RingHom.RespectsIso P)
(h₂ : RingHom.LocalizationAwayPreserves P) (h₃ : RingHom.OfLocalizationSpan P) :
(sourceAffineLocally P).IsLocal := by
constructor
· exact sourceAffineLocally_respectsIso P h₁
· intro X Y _ f r H
rw [sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict]
intro U hU
have : X.basicOpen (f.appLE ⊤ U (by simp) r) = U := by
simp only [Scheme.Hom.appLE, Opens.map_top, CommRingCat.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp,
Function.comp_apply]
rw [Scheme.basicOpen_res]
simpa using hU
rw [← f.appLE_congr _ rfl this (fun f => P f.hom),
IsAffineOpen.appLE_eq_away_map f (isAffineOpen_top Y) U.2 _ r]
simp only [CommRingCat.hom_ofHom]
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true }) h₂
exact H U
· introv hs hs' U
apply h₃ _ _ hs
intro r
simp_rw [sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict] at hs'
have := hs' r ⟨X.basicOpen (f.appLE ⊤ U le_top r.1), U.2.basicOpen (f.appLE ⊤ U le_top r.1)⟩
(by simp [Scheme.Hom.appLE])
rwa [IsAffineOpen.appLE_eq_away_map f (isAffineOpen_top Y) U.2, CommRingCat.hom_ofHom,
← h₁.isLocalization_away_iff] at this
variable {P}
lemma affineLocally_le {Q : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop}
(hPQ : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] {f : R →+* S}, P f → Q f) :
affineLocally P ≤ affineLocally Q :=
fun _ _ _ hf U V ↦ hPQ (hf U V)
open RingHom
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} {f : X ⟶ Y}
/-- If `P` holds for `f` over affine opens `U₂` of `Y` and `V₂` of `X` and `U₁` (resp. `V₁`) are
open affine neighborhoods of `x` (resp. `f.base x`), then `P` also holds for `f`
over some basic open of `U₁` (resp. `V₁`). -/
lemma exists_basicOpen_le_appLE_of_appLE_of_isAffine
(hPa : StableUnderCompositionWithLocalizationAwayTarget P) (hPl : LocalizationAwayPreserves P)
(x : X) (U₁ : Y.affineOpens) (U₂ : Y.affineOpens) (V₁ : X.affineOpens) (V₂ : X.affineOpens)
(hx₁ : x ∈ V₁.1) (hx₂ : x ∈ V₂.1) (e₂ : V₂.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U₂.1) (h₂ : P (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂).hom)
(hfx₁ : f.base x ∈ U₁.1) :
∃ (r : Γ(Y, U₁)) (s : Γ(X, V₁)) (_ : x ∈ X.basicOpen s)
(e : X.basicOpen s ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ Y.basicOpen r),
P (f.appLE (Y.basicOpen r) (X.basicOpen s) e).hom := by
obtain ⟨r, r', hBrr', hBfx⟩ := exists_basicOpen_le_affine_inter U₁.2 U₂.2 (f.base x)
⟨hfx₁, e₂ hx₂⟩
have ha : IsAffineOpen (X.basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r')) := V₂.2.basicOpen _
have hxa : x ∈ X.basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r') := by
simpa [Scheme.Hom.appLE, ← Scheme.preimage_basicOpen] using And.intro hx₂ (hBrr' ▸ hBfx)
obtain ⟨s, s', hBss', hBx⟩ := exists_basicOpen_le_affine_inter V₁.2 ha x ⟨hx₁, hxa⟩
haveI := V₂.2.isLocalization_basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r')
haveI := U₂.2.isLocalization_basicOpen r'
haveI := ha.isLocalization_basicOpen s'
have ers : X.basicOpen s ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ Y.basicOpen r := by
rw [hBss', hBrr']
apply le_trans (X.basicOpen_le _)
simp [Scheme.Hom.appLE]
have heq : f.appLE (Y.basicOpen r') (X.basicOpen s') (hBrr' ▸ hBss' ▸ ers) =
f.appLE (Y.basicOpen r') (X.basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r')) (by simp [Scheme.Hom.appLE]) ≫
CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap _ _) := by
simp only [Scheme.Hom.appLE, homOfLE_leOfHom, CommRingCat.comp_apply, Category.assoc]
congr
apply X.presheaf.map_comp
refine ⟨r, s, hBx, ers, ?_⟩
· rw [f.appLE_congr _ hBrr' hBss' (fun f => P f.hom), heq]
apply hPa _ s' _
rw [U₂.2.appLE_eq_away_map f V₂.2]
exact hPl _ _ _ _ h₂
/-- If `P` holds for `f` over affine opens `U₂` of `Y` and `V₂` of `X` and `U₁` (resp. `V₁`) are
open neighborhoods of `x` (resp. `f.base x`), then `P` also holds for `f` over some affine open
`U'` of `Y` (resp. `V'` of `X`) that is contained in `U₁` (resp. `V₁`). -/
lemma exists_affineOpens_le_appLE_of_appLE
(hPa : StableUnderCompositionWithLocalizationAwayTarget P) (hPl : LocalizationAwayPreserves P)
(x : X) (U₁ : Y.Opens) (U₂ : Y.affineOpens) (V₁ : X.Opens) (V₂ : X.affineOpens)
(hx₁ : x ∈ V₁) (hx₂ : x ∈ V₂.1) (e₂ : V₂.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U₂.1) (h₂ : P (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂).hom)
(hfx₁ : f.base x ∈ U₁.1) :
∃ (U' : Y.affineOpens) (V' : X.affineOpens) (_ : U'.1 ≤ U₁) (_ : V'.1 ≤ V₁) (_ : x ∈ V'.1)
(e : V'.1 ≤ f⁻¹ᵁ U'.1), P (f.appLE U' V' e).hom := by
obtain ⟨r, hBr, hBfx⟩ := U₂.2.exists_basicOpen_le ⟨f.base x, hfx₁⟩ (e₂ hx₂)
obtain ⟨s, hBs, hBx⟩ := V₂.2.exists_basicOpen_le ⟨x, hx₁⟩ hx₂
obtain ⟨r', s', hBx', e', hf'⟩ := exists_basicOpen_le_appLE_of_appLE_of_isAffine hPa hPl x
⟨Y.basicOpen r, U₂.2.basicOpen _⟩ U₂ ⟨X.basicOpen s, V₂.2.basicOpen _⟩ V₂ hBx hx₂ e₂ h₂ hBfx
exact ⟨⟨Y.basicOpen r', (U₂.2.basicOpen _).basicOpen _⟩,
⟨X.basicOpen s', (V₂.2.basicOpen _).basicOpen _⟩, le_trans (Y.basicOpen_le _) hBr,
le_trans (X.basicOpen_le _) hBs, hBx', e', hf'⟩
end affineLocally
/--
`HasRingHomProperty P Q` is a type class asserting that `P` is local at the target and the source,
and for `f : Spec B ⟶ Spec A`, it is equivalent to the ring hom property `Q`.
To make the proofs easier, we state it instead as
1. `Q` is local (See `RingHom.PropertyIsLocal`)
2. `P f` if and only if `Q` holds for every `Γ(Y, U) ⟶ Γ(X, V)` for all affine `U`, `V`.
See `HasRingHomProperty.iff_appLE`.
-/
class HasRingHomProperty (P : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u})
(Q : outParam (∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop)) : Prop where
isLocal_ringHomProperty : RingHom.PropertyIsLocal Q
eq_affineLocally' : P = affineLocally Q
namespace HasRingHomProperty
variable (P : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u}) {Q} [HasRingHomProperty P Q]
variable {X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
lemma copy {P' : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u}}
{Q' : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop}
(e : P = P') (e' : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S), Q f ↔ Q' f) :
HasRingHomProperty P' Q' := by
subst e
have heq : @Q = @Q' := by
ext R S _ _ f
exact (e' f)
rw [← heq]
infer_instance
lemma eq_affineLocally : P = affineLocally Q := eq_affineLocally'
@[local instance]
lemma HasAffineProperty : HasAffineProperty P (sourceAffineLocally Q) where
isLocal_affineProperty := sourceAffineLocally_isLocal _
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).localizationAwayPreserves
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).ofLocalizationSpan
eq_targetAffineLocally' := eq_affineLocally P
/- This is only `inferInstance` because of the `@[local instance]` on `HasAffineProperty` above. -/
instance (priority := 900) : IsLocalAtTarget P := inferInstance
theorem appLE (H : P f) (U : Y.affineOpens) (V : X.affineOpens) (e) : Q (f.appLE U V e).hom := by
rw [eq_affineLocally P, affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le] at H
exact H _ _ _
theorem appTop (H : P f) [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] : Q f.appTop.hom := by
rw [Scheme.Hom.appTop, Scheme.Hom.app_eq_appLE]
exact appLE P f H ⟨_, isAffineOpen_top _⟩ ⟨_, isAffineOpen_top _⟩ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias app_top := appTop
include Q in
theorem comp_of_isOpenImmersion [IsOpenImmersion f] (H : P g) :
P (f ≫ g) := by
rw [eq_affineLocally P, affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le] at H ⊢
intro U V e
have : IsIso (f.appLE (f ''ᵁ V) V.1 (f.preimage_image_eq _).ge) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsIso (f.app _ ≫
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (f.preimage_image_eq _).symm).op))
rw [← Scheme.appLE_comp_appLE _ _ _ (f ''ᵁ V) V.1
(Set.image_subset_iff.mpr e) (f.preimage_image_eq _).ge,
CommRingCat.hom_comp,
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso.cancel_right_isIso]
exact H _ ⟨_, V.2.image_of_isOpenImmersion _⟩ _
variable {P f}
lemma iff_appLE : P f ↔ ∀ (U : Y.affineOpens) (V : X.affineOpens) (e), Q (f.appLE U V e).hom := by
rw [eq_affineLocally P, affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le]
theorem of_source_openCover [IsAffine Y]
(𝒰 : X.OpenCover) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (H : ∀ i, Q ((𝒰.map i ≫ f).appTop.hom)) :
P f := by
rw [HasAffineProperty.iff_of_isAffine (P := P)]
intro U
let S i : X.affineOpens := ⟨_, isAffineOpen_opensRange (𝒰.map i)⟩
induction U using of_affine_open_cover S 𝒰.iSup_opensRange with
| basicOpen U r H =>
simp_rw [Scheme.affineBasicOpen_coe,
← f.appLE_map (U := ⊤) le_top (homOfLE (X.basicOpen_le r)).op]
have := U.2.isLocalization_basicOpen r
exact (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).StableUnderCompositionWithLocalizationAwayTarget _ r _ H
| openCover U s hs H =>
apply (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).ofLocalizationSpanTarget.ofIsLocalization
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso _ _ hs
rintro r
refine ⟨_, _, _, IsAffineOpen.isLocalization_basicOpen U.2 r, ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra, ← CommRingCat.hom_comp, Scheme.Hom.appLE_map]
exact H r
| hU i =>
specialize H i
rw [← (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso.cancel_right_isIso _
((IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq (𝒰.map i) (S i).1.ι
Subtype.range_coe.symm).inv.app _), ← CommRingCat.hom_comp, ← Scheme.comp_appTop,
IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq_inv_fac_assoc, Scheme.comp_appTop,
Scheme.Opens.ι_appTop, Scheme.Hom.appTop, Scheme.Hom.app_eq_appLE, Scheme.Hom.appLE_map] at H
exact (f.appLE_congr _ rfl (by simp) (fun f => Q f.hom)).mp H
theorem iff_of_source_openCover [IsAffine Y] (𝒰 : X.OpenCover) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] :
P f ↔ ∀ i, Q ((𝒰.map i ≫ f).appTop).hom :=
⟨fun H i ↦ appTop P _ (comp_of_isOpenImmersion P (𝒰.map i) f H), of_source_openCover 𝒰⟩
theorem iff_of_isAffine [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] :
P f ↔ Q (f.appTop).hom := by
rw [iff_of_source_openCover (P := P) (Scheme.coverOfIsIso.{u} (𝟙 _))]
simp
theorem Spec_iff {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} {φ : R ⟶ S} :
P (Spec.map φ) ↔ Q φ.hom := by
have H := (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso
rw [iff_of_isAffine (P := P), ← H.cancel_right_isIso _ (Scheme.ΓSpecIso _).hom,
← CommRingCat.hom_comp, Scheme.ΓSpecIso_naturality, CommRingCat.hom_comp, H.cancel_left_isIso]
theorem of_iSup_eq_top [IsAffine Y] {ι : Type*}
(U : ι → X.affineOpens) (hU : ⨆ i, (U i : Opens X) = ⊤)
(H : ∀ i, Q (f.appLE ⊤ (U i).1 le_top).hom) :
P f := by
have (i) : IsAffine ((X.openCoverOfISupEqTop _ hU).obj i) := (U i).2
refine of_source_openCover (X.openCoverOfISupEqTop _ hU) fun i ↦ ?_
simpa [Scheme.Hom.app_eq_appLE] using (f.appLE_congr _ rfl (by simp) (fun f => Q f.hom)).mp (H i)
theorem iff_of_iSup_eq_top [IsAffine Y] {ι : Type*}
(U : ι → X.affineOpens) (hU : ⨆ i, (U i : Opens X) = ⊤) :
P f ↔ ∀ i, Q (f.appLE ⊤ (U i).1 le_top).hom :=
⟨fun H _ ↦ appLE P f H ⟨_, isAffineOpen_top _⟩ _ le_top, of_iSup_eq_top U hU⟩
instance : IsLocalAtSource P := by
apply HasAffineProperty.isLocalAtSource
intros X Y f _ 𝒰
simp_rw [← HasAffineProperty.iff_of_isAffine (P := P),
iff_of_source_openCover 𝒰.affineRefinement.openCover,
fun i ↦ iff_of_source_openCover (P := P) (f := 𝒰.map i ≫ f) (𝒰.obj i).affineCover]
| simp [Scheme.OpenCover.affineRefinement, Sigma.forall]
lemma containsIdentities (hP : RingHom.ContainsIdentities Q) : P.ContainsIdentities where
id_mem X := by
rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _ (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top _)]
intro U
have : IsAffine (𝟙 X ⁻¹ᵁ U.1) := U.2
rw [morphismRestrict_id, iff_of_isAffine (P := P), Scheme.id_appTop]
apply hP
variable (P) in
open _root_.PrimeSpectrum in
lemma isLocal_ringHomProperty_of_isLocalAtSource_of_isLocalAtTarget
[IsLocalAtTarget P] [IsLocalAtSource P] :
RingHom.PropertyIsLocal fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f)) := by
have hP : RingHom.RespectsIso (fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f))) :=
RingHom.toMorphismProperty_respectsIso_iff.mpr
(inferInstanceAs (P.inverseImage Scheme.Spec).unop.RespectsIso)
constructor
· intro R S _ _ f r R' S' _ _ _ _ _ _ H
refine (RingHom.RespectsIso.isLocalization_away_iff hP ..).mp ?_
exact (MorphismProperty.arrow_mk_iso_iff P (SpecMapRestrictBasicOpenIso
(CommRingCat.ofHom f) r)).mp (IsLocalAtTarget.restrict H (basicOpen r))
· intros R S _ _ f s hs H
apply IsLocalAtSource.of_openCover (Scheme.affineOpenCoverOfSpanRangeEqTop
(fun i : s ↦ (i : S)) (by simpa)).openCover
intro i
simp only [CommRingCat.coe_of, Set.setOf_mem_eq, id_eq, eq_mpr_eq_cast,
Scheme.AffineOpenCover.openCover_obj, Scheme.affineOpenCoverOfSpanRangeEqTop_obj_carrier,
Scheme.AffineOpenCover.openCover_map, Scheme.affineOpenCoverOfSpanRangeEqTop_map,
← Spec.map_comp]
exact H i
· intro R S _ _ f s hs H
apply IsLocalAtTarget.of_iSup_eq_top _ (PrimeSpectrum.iSup_basicOpen_eq_top_iff
(f := fun i : s ↦ (i : R)).mpr (by simpa))
intro i
exact (MorphismProperty.arrow_mk_iso_iff P (SpecMapRestrictBasicOpenIso
(CommRingCat.ofHom f) i.1)).mpr (H i)
· intro R S T _ _ _ _ r _ f hf
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/RingHomProperties.lean | 373 | 411 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
|
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 278 | 280 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Iterate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
/-!
# Cycle factors of a permutation
Let `β` be a `Fintype` and `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleOf`: `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of `f` that `x` belongs to.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleFactors`: `f.cycleFactors` is a list of disjoint cyclic permutations
that multiply to `f`.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-!
### `cycleOf`
-/
section CycleOf
variable {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of the permutation `f` to which `x` belongs. -/
def cycleOf (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : Perm α :=
ofSubtype (subtypePerm f fun _ => sameCycle_apply_right.symm : Perm { y // SameCycle f x y })
theorem cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x y : α) :
cycleOf f x y = if SameCycle f x y then f y else y := by
dsimp only [cycleOf]
split_ifs with h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_mem
exact h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem
exact h
theorem cycleOf_inv (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
(cycleOf f x)⁻¹ = cycleOf f⁻¹ x :=
Equiv.ext fun y => by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, cycleOf_apply, cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [sameCycle_inv, sameCycle_inv_apply_right]
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_pow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℕ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro n
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n hn =>
rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, cycleOf_apply, hn, if_pos, pow_succ', mul_apply]
exact ⟨n, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_zpow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℤ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro z
cases z with
| ofNat z => exact cycleOf_pow_apply_self f x z
| negSucc z =>
rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_inv, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_pow_apply_self]
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_apply [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = f y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _
theorem cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
¬SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem _
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_eq [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
cycleOf f x = cycleOf f y := by
ext z
rw [Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs with hz
· exact (h.symm.trans hz).cycleOf_apply.symm
· exact (cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle (mt h.trans hz)).symm
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) (k : ℤ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
rw [SameCycle.cycleOf_apply]
· rw [add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_one, mul_apply]
· exact ⟨k, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) (k : ℕ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self f x k using 1
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf f x (f x) = f (f x) := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self f x 1 using 1
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : cycleOf f x x = f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply
theorem IsCycle.cycleOf_eq [DecidableRel f.SameCycle]
(hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) : cycleOf f x = f :=
Equiv.ext fun y =>
if h : SameCycle f x y then by rw [h.cycleOf_apply]
else by
rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle h,
Classical.not_not.1 (mt ((isCycle_iff_sameCycle hx).1 hf).2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_eq_one_iff (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] : cycleOf f x = 1 ↔ f x = x := by
simp_rw [Perm.ext_iff, cycleOf_apply, one_apply]
refine ⟨fun h => (if_pos (SameCycle.refl f x)).symm.trans (h x), fun h y => ?_⟩
by_cases hy : f y = y
· rw [hy, ite_self]
· exact if_neg (mt SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff (by tauto))
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf f (f x) = cycleOf f x :=
(sameCycle_apply_right.2 SameCycle.rfl).symm.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_pow (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.pow_left.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_zpow (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℤ) (x : α) :
cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.zpow_left.cycleOf_eq
protected theorem IsCycle.cycleOf [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] [DecidableEq α]
(hf : IsCycle f) : cycleOf f x = if f x = x then 1 else f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rwa [if_pos hx, cycleOf_eq_one_iff]
· rwa [if_neg hx, hf.cycleOf_eq]
theorem cycleOf_one [DecidableRel (1 : Perm α).SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf 1 x = 1 := (cycleOf_eq_one_iff 1).mpr rfl
theorem isCycle_cycleOf (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (hx : f x ≠ x) :
IsCycle (cycleOf f x) :=
have : cycleOf f x x ≠ x := by rwa [SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply]
(isCycle_iff_sameCycle this).2 @fun y =>
⟨fun h => mt h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 this, fun h =>
if hxy : SameCycle f x y then
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hxy
⟨i, by rw [cycleOf_zpow_apply_self, hi]⟩
else by
rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hxy] at h
exact (h rfl).elim⟩
theorem pow_mod_orderOf_cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
(f ^ (n % orderOf (cycleOf f x))) x = (f ^ n) x := by
rw [← cycleOf_pow_apply_self f, ← cycleOf_pow_apply_self f, pow_mod_orderOf]
theorem cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self [DecidableRel f.SameCycle]
[DecidableRel (f * g).SameCycle]
(h : Commute f g) (x : α) (hx : g x = x) : (f * g).cycleOf x = f.cycleOf x := by
ext y
by_cases hxy : (f * g).SameCycle x y
· obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hxy
rw [cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self]
simp [h.mul_zpow, zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx]
· rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hxy, cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle]
contrapose! hxy
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hxy
refine ⟨z, ?_⟩
simp [h.mul_zpow, zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx]
theorem Disjoint.cycleOf_mul_distrib [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] [DecidableRel g.SameCycle]
[DecidableRel (f * g).SameCycle] [DecidableRel (g * f).SameCycle] (h : f.Disjoint g) (x : α) :
(f * g).cycleOf x = f.cycleOf x * g.cycleOf x := by
rcases (disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq.mp h) x with hfx | hgx
· simp [h.commute.eq, cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self h.symm.commute, hfx]
· simp [cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self h.commute, hgx]
private theorem mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
y ∈ support (f.cycleOf x) ↔ SameCycle f x y ∧ x ∈ support f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [(cycleOf_eq_one_iff _).mpr hx]
simp [hx]
· rw [mem_support, cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs with hy
· simp only [hx, hy, Ne, not_false_iff, and_self_iff, mem_support]
rcases hy with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [← not_mem_support]
simpa using hx
· simpa [hx] using hy
private theorem mem_support_cycleOf_iff'_aux (hx : f x ≠ x)
[DecidableRel f.SameCycle] [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
y ∈ support (f.cycleOf x) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux, and_iff_left (mem_support.2 hx)]
/-- `x` is in the support of `f` iff `Equiv.Perm.cycle_of f x` is a cycle. -/
theorem isCycle_cycleOf_iff (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
IsCycle (cycleOf f x) ↔ f x ≠ x := by
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, f.isCycle_cycleOf⟩
rw [Ne, ← cycleOf_eq_one_iff f]
exact hx.ne_one
private theorem isCycleOn_support_cycleOf_aux [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (f : Perm α)
[DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : f.IsCycleOn (f.cycleOf x).support :=
⟨f.bijOn <| by
refine fun _ ↦
⟨fun h ↦ mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.2 ?_, fun h ↦ mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.2 ?_⟩
· exact ⟨sameCycle_apply_right.1 (mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.1 h).1,
(mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.1 h).2⟩
· exact ⟨sameCycle_apply_right.2 (mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.1 h).1,
(mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.1 h).2⟩
, fun a ha b hb =>
by
rw [mem_coe, mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux] at ha hb
exact ha.1.symm.trans hb.1⟩
private theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support_aux {f} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α]
[DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (h : SameCycle f x y) (hx : x ∈ f.support) :
∃ i < #(f.cycleOf x).support, (f ^ i) x = y := by
rw [mem_support] at hx
exact Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn.exists_pow_eq (b := y) (f.isCycleOn_support_cycleOf_aux x)
(by rw [mem_support_cycleOf_iff'_aux hx]) (by rwa [mem_support_cycleOf_iff'_aux hx])
instance instDecidableRelSameCycle [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (f : Perm α) :
DecidableRel (SameCycle f) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (y ∈ List.iterate f x (Fintype.card α)) <| by
simp only [List.mem_iterate, iterate_eq_pow, eq_comm (a := y)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, _, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, hn⟩
· intro hxy
by_cases hx : x ∈ f.support
case pos =>
-- we can't invoke the aux lemmas above without obtaining the decidable instance we are
-- already building; but now we've left the data, so we can do this non-constructively
-- without sacrificing computability.
let _inst (f : Perm α) : DecidableRel (SameCycle f) := Classical.decRel _
rcases hxy.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support_aux hx with ⟨i, hixy, hi⟩
refine ⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le hixy (card_le_univ _), hi⟩
case neg =>
haveI : Nonempty α := ⟨x⟩
rw [not_mem_support] at hx
exact ⟨0, Fintype.card_pos, hxy.eq_of_left hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem two_le_card_support_cycleOf_iff [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
2 ≤ #(cycleOf f x).support ↔ f x ≠ x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by simpa using (isCycle_cycleOf _ h).two_le_card_support⟩
contrapose! h
rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at h
simp [h]
@[simp] lemma support_cycleOf_nonempty [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
(cycleOf f x).support.Nonempty ↔ f x ≠ x := by
rw [← two_le_card_support_cycleOf_iff, ← card_pos, ← Nat.succ_le_iff]
exact ⟨fun h => Or.resolve_left h.eq_or_lt (card_support_ne_one _).symm, zero_lt_two.trans_le⟩
theorem mem_support_cycleOf_iff [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
y ∈ support (f.cycleOf x) ↔ SameCycle f x y ∧ x ∈ support f :=
mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux
theorem mem_support_cycleOf_iff' (hx : f x ≠ x) [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
y ∈ support (f.cycleOf x) ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
mem_support_cycleOf_iff'_aux hx
theorem sameCycle_iff_cycleOf_eq_of_mem_support [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α]
{g : Perm α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ g.support) (hy : y ∈ g.support) :
g.SameCycle x y ↔ g.cycleOf x = g.cycleOf y := by
refine ⟨SameCycle.cycleOf_eq, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← mem_support_cycleOf_iff' (mem_support.mp hx), h,
mem_support_cycleOf_iff' (mem_support.mp hy)]
theorem support_cycleOf_eq_nil_iff [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
(f.cycleOf x).support = ∅ ↔ x ∉ f.support := by simp
theorem isCycleOn_support_cycleOf [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (f : Perm α) (x : α) :
f.IsCycleOn (f.cycleOf x).support :=
isCycleOn_support_cycleOf_aux f x
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support {f} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (h : SameCycle f x y)
(hx : x ∈ f.support) : ∃ i < #(f.cycleOf x).support, (f ^ i) x = y :=
h.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support_aux hx
theorem support_cycleOf_le [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (f : Perm α) (x : α) :
support (f.cycleOf x) ≤ support f := by
intro y hy
rw [mem_support, cycleOf_apply] at hy
split_ifs at hy
· exact mem_support.mpr hy
· exact absurd rfl hy
theorem SameCycle.mem_support_iff {f} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
x ∈ support f ↔ y ∈ support f :=
⟨fun hx => support_cycleOf_le f x (mem_support_cycleOf_iff.mpr ⟨h, hx⟩), fun hy =>
support_cycleOf_le f y (mem_support_cycleOf_iff.mpr ⟨h.symm, hy⟩)⟩
theorem pow_mod_card_support_cycleOf_self_apply [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α]
(f : Perm α) (n : ℕ) (x : α) : (f ^ (n % #(f.cycleOf x).support)) x = (f ^ n) x := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx]
· rw [← cycleOf_pow_apply_self, ← cycleOf_pow_apply_self f, ← (isCycle_cycleOf f hx).orderOf,
pow_mod_orderOf]
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (f : Perm α) (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, 0 < i ∧ i ≤ #(f.cycleOf x).support + 1 ∧ (f ^ i) x = y := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ f.support
· obtain ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support hx
rcases k with - | k
· refine ⟨#(f.cycleOf x).support, ?_, self_le_add_right _ _, ?_⟩
· refine zero_lt_one.trans (one_lt_card_support_of_ne_one ?_)
simpa using hx
· simp only [pow_zero, coe_one, id_eq] at hk'
subst hk'
rw [← (isCycle_cycleOf _ <| mem_support.1 hx).orderOf, ← cycleOf_pow_apply_self,
pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_apply]
· exact ⟨k + 1, by simp, Nat.le_succ_of_le hk.le, hk'⟩
· refine ⟨1, zero_lt_one, by simp, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := h
rw [not_mem_support] at hx
rw [pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx, zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx]
theorem zpow_eq_zpow_on_iff [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α]
(g : Perm α) {m n : ℤ} {x : α} (hx : g x ≠ x) :
(g ^ m) x = (g ^ n) x ↔ m % #(g.cycleOf x).support = n % #(g.cycleOf x).support := by
rw [Int.emod_eq_emod_iff_emod_sub_eq_zero]
conv_lhs => rw [← Int.sub_add_cancel m n, Int.add_comm, zpow_add]
simp only [coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
rw [← Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero]
rw [← cycleOf_zpow_apply_self g x, cycle_zpow_mem_support_iff]
· rw [← Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero]
· exact isCycle_cycleOf g hx
· simp only [mem_support, cycleOf_apply_self]; exact hx
end CycleOf
/-!
### `cycleFactors`
-/
section cycleFactors
open scoped List in
/-- Given a list `l : List α` and a permutation `f : Perm α` whose nonfixed points are all in `l`,
recursively factors `f` into cycles. -/
def cycleFactorsAux [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α]
(l : List α) (f : Perm α) (h : ∀ {x}, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l) :
{ pl : List (Perm α) // pl.prod = f ∧ (∀ g ∈ pl, IsCycle g) ∧ pl.Pairwise Disjoint } :=
go l f h (fun _ => rfl)
where
/-- The auxiliary of `cycleFactorsAux`. This functions separates cycles from `f` instead of `g`
to prevent the process of a cycle gets complex. -/
go (l : List α) (g : Perm α) (hg : ∀ {x}, g x ≠ x → x ∈ l)
(hfg : ∀ {x}, g x ≠ x → cycleOf f x = cycleOf g x) :
{ pl : List (Perm α) // pl.prod = g ∧ (∀ g' ∈ pl, IsCycle g') ∧ pl.Pairwise Disjoint } :=
match l with
| [] => ⟨[], by
{ simp only [imp_false, List.Pairwise.nil, List.not_mem_nil, forall_const, and_true,
forall_prop_of_false, Classical.not_not, not_false_iff, List.prod_nil] at *
ext
simp [*]}⟩
| x :: l =>
if hx : g x = x then go l g (by
intro y hy; exact List.mem_of_ne_of_mem (fun h => hy (by rwa [h])) (hg hy)) hfg
else
let ⟨m, hm₁, hm₂, hm₃⟩ :=
go l ((cycleOf f x)⁻¹ * g) (by
rw [hfg hx]
intro y hy
exact List.mem_of_ne_of_mem
(fun h : y = x => by
rw [h, mul_apply, Ne, inv_eq_iff_eq, cycleOf_apply_self] at hy
exact hy rfl)
(hg fun h : g y = y => by
rw [mul_apply, h, Ne, inv_eq_iff_eq, cycleOf_apply] at hy
split_ifs at hy <;> tauto))
(by
rw [hfg hx]
intro y hy
simp [inv_eq_iff_eq, cycleOf_apply, eq_comm (a := g y)] at hy
rw [hfg (Ne.symm hy.right), ← mul_inv_eq_one (a := g.cycleOf y), cycleOf_inv]
simp_rw [mul_inv_rev]
rw [inv_inv, cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self, ← cycleOf_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
· rw [Commute.inv_left_iff, commute_iff_eq]
ext z; by_cases hz : SameCycle g x z
· simp [cycleOf_apply, hz]
· simp [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle, hz]
· exact cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hy.left)
⟨cycleOf f x :: m, by
rw [hfg hx] at hm₁ ⊢
constructor
· rw [List.prod_cons, hm₁]
simp
· exact
⟨fun g' hg' =>
((List.mem_cons).1 hg').elim (fun hg' => hg'.symm ▸ isCycle_cycleOf _ hx) (hm₂ g'),
List.pairwise_cons.2
⟨fun g' hg' y =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hgy =>
have hxy : SameCycle g x y :=
Classical.not_not.1 (mt cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hgy)
have hg'm : (g' :: m.erase g') ~ m :=
List.cons_perm_iff_perm_erase.2 ⟨hg', List.Perm.refl _⟩
have : ∀ h ∈ m.erase g', Disjoint g' h :=
(List.pairwise_cons.1 ((hg'm.pairwise_iff Disjoint.symm).2 hm₃)).1
by_cases id fun hg'y : g' y ≠ y =>
(disjoint_prod_right _ this y).resolve_right <| by
have hsc : SameCycle g⁻¹ x (g y) := by
rwa [sameCycle_inv, sameCycle_apply_right]
rw [disjoint_prod_perm hm₃ hg'm.symm, List.prod_cons,
← eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq] at hm₁
rwa [hm₁, mul_apply, mul_apply, cycleOf_inv, hsc.cycleOf_apply,
inv_apply_self, inv_eq_iff_eq, eq_comm],
hm₃⟩⟩⟩
theorem mem_list_cycles_iff {α : Type*} [Finite α] {l : List (Perm α)}
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) {σ : Perm α} :
σ ∈ l ↔ σ.IsCycle ∧ ∀ a, σ a ≠ a → σ a = l.prod a := by
suffices σ.IsCycle → (σ ∈ l ↔ ∀ a, σ a ≠ a → σ a = l.prod a) by
exact ⟨fun hσ => ⟨h1 σ hσ, (this (h1 σ hσ)).mp hσ⟩, fun hσ => (this hσ.1).mpr hσ.2⟩
intro h3
classical
cases nonempty_fintype α
constructor
· intro h a ha
exact eq_on_support_mem_disjoint h h2 _ (mem_support.mpr ha)
· intro h
have hσl : σ.support ⊆ l.prod.support := by
intro x hx
rw [mem_support] at hx
rwa [mem_support, ← h _ hx]
obtain ⟨a, ha, -⟩ := id h3
rw [← mem_support] at ha
obtain ⟨τ, hτ, hτa⟩ := exists_mem_support_of_mem_support_prod (hσl ha)
have hτl : ∀ x ∈ τ.support, τ x = l.prod x := eq_on_support_mem_disjoint hτ h2
have key : ∀ x ∈ σ.support ∩ τ.support, σ x = τ x := by
intro x hx
rw [h x (mem_support.mp (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx)), hτl x (mem_of_mem_inter_right hx)]
convert hτ
refine h3.eq_on_support_inter_nonempty_congr (h1 _ hτ) key ?_ ha
exact key a (mem_inter_of_mem ha hτa)
open scoped List in
theorem list_cycles_perm_list_cycles {α : Type*} [Finite α] {l₁ l₂ : List (Perm α)}
(h₀ : l₁.prod = l₂.prod) (h₁l₁ : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l₁ → σ.IsCycle)
(h₁l₂ : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l₂ → σ.IsCycle) (h₂l₁ : l₁.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h₂l₂ : l₂.Pairwise Disjoint) : l₁ ~ l₂ := by
classical
refine
(List.perm_ext_iff_of_nodup (nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h₁l₁ h₂l₁)
(nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h₁l₂ h₂l₂)).mpr
fun σ => ?_
by_cases hσ : σ.IsCycle
· obtain _ := not_forall.mp (mt ext hσ.ne_one)
rw [mem_list_cycles_iff h₁l₁ h₂l₁, mem_list_cycles_iff h₁l₂ h₂l₂, h₀]
· exact iff_of_false (mt (h₁l₁ σ) hσ) (mt (h₁l₂ σ) hσ)
/-- Factors a permutation `f` into a list of disjoint cyclic permutations that multiply to `f`. -/
def cycleFactors [Fintype α] [LinearOrder α] (f : Perm α) :
{ l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ (∀ g ∈ l, IsCycle g) ∧ l.Pairwise Disjoint } :=
cycleFactorsAux (sort (α := α) (· ≤ ·) univ) f (fun {_ _} ↦ (mem_sort _).2 (mem_univ _))
/-- Factors a permutation `f` into a list of disjoint cyclic permutations that multiply to `f`,
without a linear order. -/
def truncCycleFactors [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (f : Perm α) :
Trunc { l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ (∀ g ∈ l, IsCycle g) ∧ l.Pairwise Disjoint } :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (@univ α _).1 (fun l h => Trunc.mk (cycleFactorsAux l f (h _)))
(show ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ (@univ α _).1 from fun _ _ => mem_univ _)
section CycleFactorsFinset
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (f : Perm α)
/-- Factors a permutation `f` into a `Finset` of disjoint cyclic permutations that multiply to `f`.
-/
def cycleFactorsFinset : Finset (Perm α) :=
(truncCycleFactors f).lift
(fun l : { l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ (∀ g ∈ l, IsCycle g) ∧ l.Pairwise Disjoint } =>
l.val.toFinset)
fun ⟨_, hl⟩ ⟨_, hl'⟩ =>
List.toFinset_eq_of_perm _ _
(list_cycles_perm_list_cycles (hl'.left.symm ▸ hl.left) hl.right.left hl'.right.left
hl.right.right hl'.right.right)
open scoped List in
theorem cycleFactorsFinset_eq_list_toFinset {σ : Perm α} {l : List (Perm α)} (hn : l.Nodup) :
σ.cycleFactorsFinset = l.toFinset ↔
(∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ l → f.IsCycle) ∧ l.Pairwise Disjoint ∧ l.prod = σ := by
obtain ⟨⟨l', hp', hc', hd'⟩, hl⟩ := Trunc.exists_rep σ.truncCycleFactors
have ht : cycleFactorsFinset σ = l'.toFinset := by
rw [cycleFactorsFinset, ← hl, Trunc.lift_mk]
rw [ht]
constructor
· intro h
have hn' : l'.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles hc' hd'
have hperm : l ~ l' := List.perm_of_nodup_nodup_toFinset_eq hn hn' h.symm
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact fun _ h => hc' _ (hperm.subset h)
· have := List.Perm.pairwise_iff (@Disjoint.symmetric _) hperm
rwa [this]
· rw [← hp', hperm.symm.prod_eq']
refine hd'.imp ?_
exact Disjoint.commute
· rintro ⟨hc, hd, hp⟩
refine List.toFinset_eq_of_perm _ _ ?_
refine list_cycles_perm_list_cycles ?_ hc' hc hd' hd
rw [hp, hp']
theorem cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset {σ : Perm α} {s : Finset (Perm α)} :
σ.cycleFactorsFinset = s ↔
(∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle) ∧
∃ h : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint,
s.noncommProd id (h.mono' fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ := by
obtain ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩ := s.exists_list_nodup_eq
simp [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_list_toFinset, hl]
theorem cycleFactorsFinset_pairwise_disjoint :
(cycleFactorsFinset f : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint :=
(cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset.mp rfl).2.choose
/-- Two cycles of a permutation commute. -/
theorem cycleFactorsFinset_mem_commute : (cycleFactorsFinset f : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Commute :=
(cycleFactorsFinset_pairwise_disjoint _).mono' fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute
/-- Two cycles of a permutation commute. -/
theorem cycleFactorsFinset_mem_commute' {g1 g2 : Perm α}
(h1 : g1 ∈ f.cycleFactorsFinset) (h2 : g2 ∈ f.cycleFactorsFinset) :
Commute g1 g2 := by
rcases eq_or_ne g1 g2 with rfl | h
· apply Commute.refl
· exact Equiv.Perm.cycleFactorsFinset_mem_commute f h1 h2 h
/-- The product of cycle factors is equal to the original `f : perm α`. -/
theorem cycleFactorsFinset_noncommProd
(comm : (cycleFactorsFinset f : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Commute :=
| cycleFactorsFinset_mem_commute f) :
f.cycleFactorsFinset.noncommProd id comm = f :=
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Factors.lean | 546 | 547 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
/-!
# Oriented angles in right-angled triangles.
This file proves basic geometrical results about distances and oriented angles in (possibly
degenerate) right-angled triangles in real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Orientation
open Module
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y - x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y - x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, where one side is a multiple
of a rotation of another by `π / 2`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle x (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = Real.arctan r := by
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | rfl | hr)
· have ha : o.oangle x (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = -(π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [o.oangle_smul_right_of_neg _ _ hr, o.oangle_neg_right h, o.oangle_rotation_self_right h, ←
sub_eq_zero, add_comm, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Real.Angle.coe_add, ← Real.Angle.coe_add,
add_assoc, add_halves, ← two_mul, Real.Angle.coe_two_pi]
simpa using h
-- Porting note: if the type is not given in `neg_neg` then Lean "forgets" about the instance
-- `Neg (Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))`
| rw [← neg_inj, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, @neg_neg Real.Angle] at ha
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj, oangle_rev,
(-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two ha, norm_smul,
LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map, mul_div_assoc, div_self (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h), mul_one,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_neg hr, Real.arctan_neg, Real.Angle.coe_neg, neg_neg]
· rw [zero_smul, add_zero, oangle_self, Real.arctan_zero, Real.Angle.coe_zero]
· have ha : o.oangle x (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ hr, o.oangle_rotation_self_right h]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 456 | 463 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnectedComponent
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Regular
/-!
# Linear order is a completely normal Hausdorff topological space
In this file we prove that a linear order with order topology is a completely normal Hausdorff
topological space.
-/
open Filter Set Function OrderDual Topology Interval
variable {X : Type*} [LinearOrder X] [TopologicalSpace X] [OrderTopology X] {a : X} {s t : Set X}
namespace Set
@[simp]
theorem ordConnectedComponent_mem_nhds : ordConnectedComponent s a ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
refine ⟨fun h => mem_of_superset h ordConnectedComponent_subset, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhds h with ⟨b, c, ha, ha', hs⟩
exact mem_of_superset ha' (subset_ordConnectedComponent ha hs)
theorem compl_ordConnectedSection_ordSeparatingSet_mem_nhdsGE (hd : Disjoint s (closure t))
(ha : a ∈ s) : (ordConnectedSection (ordSeparatingSet s t))ᶜ ∈ 𝓝[≥] a := by
have hmem : tᶜ ∈ 𝓝[≥] a := by
refine mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ?_
rw [← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, interior_compl]
exact disjoint_left.1 hd ha
rcases exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhdsGE hmem with ⟨b, hab, hmem', hsub⟩
by_cases H : Disjoint (Icc a b) (ordConnectedSection <| ordSeparatingSet s t)
· exact mem_of_superset hmem' (disjoint_left.1 H)
· simp only [Set.disjoint_left, not_forall, Classical.not_not] at H
rcases H with ⟨c, ⟨hac, hcb⟩, hc⟩
have hsub' : Icc a b ⊆ ordConnectedComponent tᶜ a :=
subset_ordConnectedComponent (left_mem_Icc.2 hab) hsub
have hd : Disjoint s (ordConnectedSection (ordSeparatingSet s t)) :=
disjoint_left_ordSeparatingSet.mono_right ordConnectedSection_subset
replace hac : a < c := hac.lt_of_ne <| Ne.symm <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc <|
disjoint_left.1 hd ha
filter_upwards [Ico_mem_nhdsGE hac] with x hx hx'
refine hx.2.ne (eq_of_mem_ordConnectedSection_of_uIcc_subset hx' hc ?_)
refine subset_inter (subset_iUnion₂_of_subset a ha ?_) ?_
· exact OrdConnected.uIcc_subset inferInstance (hsub' ⟨hx.1, hx.2.le.trans hcb⟩)
(hsub' ⟨hac.le, hcb⟩)
· rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (ordConnectedSection_subset hx').2 with ⟨y, hyt, hxy⟩
refine subset_iUnion₂_of_subset y hyt (OrdConnected.uIcc_subset inferInstance hxy ?_)
refine subset_ordConnectedComponent left_mem_uIcc hxy ?_
suffices c < y by
rw [uIcc_of_ge (hx.2.trans this).le]
exact ⟨hx.2.le, this.le⟩
refine lt_of_not_le fun hyc => ?_
have hya : y < a := not_le.1 fun hay => hsub ⟨hay, hyc.trans hcb⟩ hyt
exact hxy (Icc_subset_uIcc ⟨hya.le, hx.1⟩) ha
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias compl_section_ordSeparatingSet_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici :=
compl_ordConnectedSection_ordSeparatingSet_mem_nhdsGE
theorem compl_ordConnectedSection_ordSeparatingSet_mem_nhdsLE (hd : Disjoint s (closure t))
(ha : a ∈ s) : (ordConnectedSection <| ordSeparatingSet s t)ᶜ ∈ 𝓝[≤] a := by
have hd' : Disjoint (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (closure <| ofDual ⁻¹' t) := hd
have ha' : toDual a ∈ ofDual ⁻¹' s := ha
simpa only [dual_ordSeparatingSet, dual_ordConnectedSection] using
compl_ordConnectedSection_ordSeparatingSet_mem_nhdsGE hd' ha'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
| alias compl_section_ordSeparatingSet_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic :=
compl_ordConnectedSection_ordSeparatingSet_mem_nhdsLE
theorem compl_ordConnectedSection_ordSeparatingSet_mem_nhds (hd : Disjoint s (closure t))
(ha : a ∈ s) : (ordConnectedSection <| ordSeparatingSet s t)ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsLE_sup_nhdsGE, mem_sup]
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/T5.lean | 74 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
/-!
# Perpendicular bisector of a segment
We define `AffineSubspace.perpBisector p₁ p₂` to be the perpendicular bisector of the segment
`[p₁, p₂]`, as a bundled affine subspace. We also prove that a point belongs to the perpendicular
bisector if and only if it is equidistant from `p₁` and `p₂`, as well as a few linear equations that
define this subspace.
## Keywords
euclidean geometry, perpendicular, perpendicular bisector, line segment bisector, equidistant
-/
open Set
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
noncomputable section
namespace AffineSubspace
variable {c p₁ p₂ : P}
/-- Perpendicular bisector of a segment in a Euclidean affine space. -/
def perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) : AffineSubspace ℝ P :=
mk' (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) (LinearMap.ker (innerₛₗ ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁)))
/-- A point `c` belongs the perpendicular bisector of `[p₁, p₂] iff `p₂ -ᵥ p₁` is orthogonal to
`c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂`. -/
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero' :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪p₂ -ᵥ p₁, c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂⟫ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A point `c` belongs the perpendicular bisector of `[p₁, p₂] iff `c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂` is
orthogonal to `p₂ -ᵥ p₁`. -/
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_eq_zero_symm
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_pointReflection_vsub_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪Equiv.pointReflection c p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, Equiv.pointReflection_apply,
vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, ← smul_add, real_inner_smul_left, vadd_vsub_assoc]
simp
theorem mem_perpBisector_pointReflection_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ (Equiv.pointReflection p₂ p₁) ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, midpoint_pointReflection_right,
Equiv.pointReflection_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, inner_add_right, add_self_eq_zero,
← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
theorem midpoint_mem_perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) :
midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ := by
simp [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero]
theorem perpBisector_nonempty : (perpBisector p₁ p₂ : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨_, midpoint_mem_perpBisector _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem direction_perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) :
(perpBisector p₁ p₂).direction = (ℝ ∙ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁))ᗮ := by
rw [perpBisector, direction_mk']
| ext x
exact Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right.symm
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = ⟪c -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ := by
rw [Iff.comm, mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, ← add_neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right,
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/PerpBisector.lean | 73 | 78 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Equiv
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid
/-!
# Topological group with zero
In this file we define `HasContinuousInv₀` to be a mixin typeclass a type with `Inv` and
`Zero` (e.g., a `GroupWithZero`) such that `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is continuous at all nonzero points. Any
normed (semi)field has this property. Currently the only example of `HasContinuousInv₀` in
`mathlib` which is not a normed field is the type `NNReal` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0`) of nonnegative real
numbers.
Then we prove lemmas about continuity of `x ↦ x⁻¹` and `f / g` providing dot-style `*.inv₀` and
`*.div` operations on `Filter.Tendsto`, `ContinuousAt`, `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn`,
and `Continuous`. As a special case, we provide `*.div_const` operations that require only
`DivInvMonoid` and `ContinuousMul` instances.
All lemmas about `(⁻¹)` use `inv₀` in their names because lemmas without `₀` are used for
`IsTopologicalGroup`s. We also use `'` in the typeclass name `HasContinuousInv₀` for the sake of
consistency of notation.
On a `GroupWithZero` with continuous multiplication, we also define left and right multiplication
as homeomorphisms.
-/
open Topology Filter Function
/-!
### A `DivInvMonoid` with continuous multiplication
If `G₀` is a `DivInvMonoid` with continuous `(*)`, then `(/y)` is continuous for any `y`. In this
section we prove lemmas that immediately follow from this fact providing `*.div_const` dot-style
operations on `Filter.Tendsto`, `ContinuousAt`, `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn`, and
`Continuous`.
-/
variable {α β G₀ : Type*}
section DivConst
variable [DivInvMonoid G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [ContinuousMul G₀] {f : α → G₀} {s : Set α}
{l : Filter α}
theorem Filter.Tendsto.div_const {x : G₀} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (y : G₀) :
Tendsto (fun a => f a / y) l (𝓝 (x / y)) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul tendsto_const_nhds
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.div_const {a : α} (hf : ContinuousAt f a) (y : G₀) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => f x / y) a :=
hf.div_const y
nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.div_const {a} (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) (y : G₀) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => f x / y) s a :=
hf.div_const _
theorem ContinuousOn.div_const (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (y : G₀) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => f x / y) s := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul continuousOn_const
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.div_const (hf : Continuous f) (y : G₀) : Continuous fun x => f x / y := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul continuous_const
end DivConst
/-- A type with `0` and `Inv` such that `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is continuous at all nonzero points. Any
normed (semi)field has this property. -/
class HasContinuousInv₀ (G₀ : Type*) [Zero G₀] [Inv G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] : Prop where
/-- The map `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is continuous at all nonzero points. -/
continuousAt_inv₀ : ∀ ⦃x : G₀⦄, x ≠ 0 → ContinuousAt Inv.inv x
export HasContinuousInv₀ (continuousAt_inv₀)
section Inv₀
variable [Zero G₀] [Inv G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [HasContinuousInv₀ G₀] {l : Filter α} {f : α → G₀}
{s : Set α} {a : α}
/-!
### Continuity of `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` at a non-zero point
We define `HasContinuousInv₀` to be a `GroupWithZero` such that the operation `x ↦ x⁻¹`
is continuous at all nonzero points. In this section we prove dot-style `*.inv₀` lemmas for
`Filter.Tendsto`, `ContinuousAt`, `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn`, and `Continuous`.
-/
theorem tendsto_inv₀ {x : G₀} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝 x) (𝓝 x⁻¹) :=
continuousAt_inv₀ hx
theorem continuousOn_inv₀ : ContinuousOn (Inv.inv : G₀ → G₀) {0}ᶜ := fun _x hx =>
(continuousAt_inv₀ hx).continuousWithinAt
/-- If a function converges to a nonzero value, its inverse converges to the inverse of this value.
We use the name `Filter.Tendsto.inv₀` as `Filter.Tendsto.inv` is already used in multiplicative
topological groups. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.inv₀ {a : G₀} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) l (𝓝 a⁻¹) :=
(tendsto_inv₀ ha).comp hf
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.inv₀ (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) (ha : f a ≠ 0) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s a :=
hf.inv₀ ha
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.inv₀ (hf : ContinuousAt f a) (ha : f a ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) a :=
hf.inv₀ ha
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.inv₀ (hf : Continuous f) (h0 : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) : Continuous fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (hf.tendsto x).inv₀ (h0 x)
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.inv₀ (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).inv₀ (h0 x hx)
end Inv₀
/-- If `G₀` is a group with zero with topology such that `x ↦ x⁻¹` is continuous at all nonzero
points. Then the coercion `G₀ˣ → G₀` is a topological embedding. -/
theorem Units.isEmbedding_val₀ [GroupWithZero G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [HasContinuousInv₀ G₀] :
IsEmbedding (val : G₀ˣ → G₀) :=
embedding_val_mk <| (continuousOn_inv₀ (G₀ := G₀)).mono fun _ ↦ IsUnit.ne_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Units.embedding_val₀ := Units.isEmbedding_val₀
section NhdsInv
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [HasContinuousInv₀ G₀] {x : G₀}
lemma nhds_inv₀ (hx : x ≠ 0) : 𝓝 x⁻¹ = (𝓝 x)⁻¹ := by
refine le_antisymm (inv_le_iff_le_inv.1 ?_) (tendsto_inv₀ hx)
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv₀ (inv_ne_zero hx)
lemma tendsto_inv_iff₀ {l : Filter α} {f : α → G₀} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) l (𝓝 x⁻¹) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) := by
simp only [nhds_inv₀ hx, ← Filter.comap_inv, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def, inv_inv]
end NhdsInv
/-!
### Continuity of division
If `G₀` is a `GroupWithZero` with `x ↦ x⁻¹` continuous at all nonzero points and `(*)`, then
division `(/)` is continuous at any point where the denominator is continuous.
-/
section Div
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [HasContinuousInv₀ G₀] [ContinuousMul G₀]
{f g : α → G₀}
theorem Filter.Tendsto.div {l : Filter α} {a b : G₀} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a))
(hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b)) (hy : b ≠ 0) : Tendsto (f / g) l (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ hy)
theorem Filter.tendsto_mul_iff_of_ne_zero [T1Space G₀] {f g : α → G₀} {l : Filter α} {x y : G₀}
(hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Tendsto (fun n => f n * g n) l (𝓝 <| x * y) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) := by
refine ⟨fun hfg => ?_, fun hf => hf.mul hg⟩
rw [← mul_div_cancel_right₀ x hy]
refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ (hfg.div hg hy)
exact (hg.eventually_ne hy).mono fun n hn => mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hn
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {a : α}
nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.div (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a)
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s a) (h₀ : g a ≠ 0) : ContinuousWithinAt (f / g) s a :=
hf.div hg h₀
theorem ContinuousOn.div (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₀ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0) :
ContinuousOn (f / g) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).div (hg x hx) (h₀ x hx)
/-- Continuity at a point of the result of dividing two functions continuous at that point, where
the denominator is nonzero. -/
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.div (hf : ContinuousAt f a) (hg : ContinuousAt g a) (h₀ : g a ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (f / g) a :=
hf.div hg h₀
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.div (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (h₀ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0) :
Continuous (f / g) := by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ h₀)
theorem continuousOn_div : ContinuousOn (fun p : G₀ × G₀ => p.1 / p.2) { p | p.2 ≠ 0 } :=
continuousOn_fst.div continuousOn_snd fun _ => id
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.div₀ (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (h₀ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0) :
Continuous (fun x => f x / g x) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ h₀)
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.div₀ (hf : ContinuousAt f a) (hg : ContinuousAt g a) (h₀ : g a ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => f x / g x) a := ContinuousAt.div hf hg h₀
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.div₀ (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₀ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => f x / g x) s := ContinuousOn.div hf hg h₀
/-- The function `f x / g x` is discontinuous when `g x = 0`. However, under appropriate
conditions, `h x (f x / g x)` is still continuous. The condition is that if `g a = 0` then `h x y`
must tend to `h a 0` when `x` tends to `a`, with no information about `y`. This is represented by
the `⊤` filter. Note: `tendsto_prod_top_iff` characterizes this convergence in uniform spaces. See
also `Filter.prod_top` and `Filter.mem_prod_top`. -/
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_div_cases {f g : α → G₀} (h : α → G₀ → β) (hf : ContinuousAt f a)
(hg : ContinuousAt g a) (hh : g a ≠ 0 → ContinuousAt (↿h) (a, f a / g a))
(h2h : g a = 0 → Tendsto (↿h) (𝓝 a ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓝 (h a 0))) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => h x (f x / g x)) a := by
show ContinuousAt (↿h ∘ fun x => (x, f x / g x)) a
by_cases hga : g a = 0
· rw [ContinuousAt]
simp_rw [comp_apply, hga, div_zero]
exact (h2h hga).comp (continuousAt_id.tendsto.prodMk tendsto_top)
· fun_prop (disch := assumption)
/-- `h x (f x / g x)` is continuous under certain conditions, even if the denominator is sometimes
`0`. See docstring of `ContinuousAt.comp_div_cases`. -/
theorem Continuous.comp_div_cases {f g : α → G₀} (h : α → G₀ → β) (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (hh : ∀ a, g a ≠ 0 → ContinuousAt (↿h) (a, f a / g a))
(h2h : ∀ a, g a = 0 → Tendsto (↿h) (𝓝 a ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓝 (h a 0))) :
Continuous fun x => h x (f x / g x) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun a =>
hf.continuousAt.comp_div_cases _ hg.continuousAt (hh a) (h2h a)
end Div
/-! ### Left and right multiplication as homeomorphisms -/
namespace Homeomorph
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [GroupWithZero α] [ContinuousMul α]
/-- Left multiplication by a nonzero element in a `GroupWithZero` with continuous multiplication
is a homeomorphism of the underlying type. -/
protected def mulLeft₀ (c : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) : α ≃ₜ α :=
{ Equiv.mulLeft₀ c hc with
continuous_toFun := continuous_mul_left _
continuous_invFun := continuous_mul_left _ }
/-- Right multiplication by a nonzero element in a `GroupWithZero` with continuous multiplication
is a homeomorphism of the underlying type. -/
protected def mulRight₀ (c : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) : α ≃ₜ α :=
{ Equiv.mulRight₀ c hc with
continuous_toFun := continuous_mul_right _
continuous_invFun := continuous_mul_right _ }
@[simp]
theorem coe_mulLeft₀ (c : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) : ⇑(Homeomorph.mulLeft₀ c hc) = (c * ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mulLeft₀_symm_apply (c : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
((Homeomorph.mulLeft₀ c hc).symm : α → α) = (c⁻¹ * ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mulRight₀ (c : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) : ⇑(Homeomorph.mulRight₀ c hc) = (· * c) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mulRight₀_symm_apply (c : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
((Homeomorph.mulRight₀ c hc).symm : α → α) = (· * c⁻¹) :=
rfl
end Homeomorph
section map_comap
variable [TopologicalSpace G₀] [GroupWithZero G₀] [ContinuousMul G₀] {a : G₀}
theorem map_mul_left_nhds₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (b : G₀) : map (a * ·) (𝓝 b) = 𝓝 (a * b) :=
(Homeomorph.mulLeft₀ a ha).map_nhds_eq b
theorem map_mul_left_nhds_one₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : map (a * ·) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 (a) := by
rw [map_mul_left_nhds₀ ha, mul_one]
theorem map_mul_right_nhds₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (b : G₀) : map (· * a) (𝓝 b) = 𝓝 (b * a) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight₀ a ha).map_nhds_eq b
theorem map_mul_right_nhds_one₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : map (· * a) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 (a) := by
rw [map_mul_right_nhds₀ ha, one_mul]
theorem nhds_translation_mul_inv₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : comap (· * a⁻¹) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 a :=
((Homeomorph.mulRight₀ a ha).symm.comap_nhds_eq 1).trans <| by simp
/-- If a group with zero has continuous multiplication and `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is continuous at one,
then it is continuous at any unit. -/
theorem HasContinuousInv₀.of_nhds_one (h : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝 (1 : G₀)) (𝓝 1)) :
HasContinuousInv₀ G₀ where
continuousAt_inv₀ x hx := by
have hx' := inv_ne_zero hx
rw [ContinuousAt, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one₀ hx, ← nhds_translation_mul_inv₀ hx',
tendsto_map'_iff, tendsto_comap_iff]
simpa only [Function.comp_def, mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ hx']
end map_comap
section ZPow
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [HasContinuousInv₀ G₀] [ContinuousMul G₀]
theorem continuousAt_zpow₀ (x : G₀) (m : ℤ) (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 ≤ m) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => x ^ m) x := by
rcases m with m | m
· simpa only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast] using continuousAt_pow x m
· simp only [zpow_negSucc]
have hx : x ≠ 0 := h.resolve_right (Int.negSucc_lt_zero m).not_le
| exact (continuousAt_pow x (m + 1)).inv₀ (pow_ne_zero _ hx)
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/GroupWithZero.lean | 320 | 321 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
/-!
# Functions functorial with respect to equivalences
An `EquivFunctor` is a function from `Type → Type` equipped with the additional data of
coherently mapping equivalences to equivalences.
In categorical language, it is an endofunctor of the "core" of the category `Type`.
-/
universe u₀ u₁ u₂ v₀ v₁ v₂
open Function
/-- An `EquivFunctor` is only functorial with respect to equivalences.
To construct an `EquivFunctor`, it suffices to supply just the function `f α → f β` from
an equivalence `α ≃ β`, and then prove the functor laws. It's then a consequence that
this function is part of an equivalence, provided by `EquivFunctor.mapEquiv`.
-/
class EquivFunctor (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) where
/-- The action of `f` on isomorphisms. -/
map : ∀ {α β}, α ≃ β → f α → f β
/-- `map` of `f` preserves the identity morphism. -/
map_refl' : ∀ α, map (Equiv.refl α) = @id (f α) := by rfl
/-- `map` is functorial on equivalences. -/
map_trans' : ∀ {α β γ} (k : α ≃ β) (h : β ≃ γ), map (k.trans h) = map h ∘ map k := by rfl
attribute [simp] EquivFunctor.map_refl'
namespace EquivFunctor
section
variable (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) [EquivFunctor f] {α β : Type u₀} (e : α ≃ β)
/-- An `EquivFunctor` in fact takes every equiv to an equiv. -/
def mapEquiv : f α ≃ f β where
toFun := EquivFunctor.map e
invFun := EquivFunctor.map e.symm
left_inv x := by
convert (congr_fun (EquivFunctor.map_trans' e e.symm) x).symm
simp
right_inv y := by
convert (congr_fun (EquivFunctor.map_trans' e.symm e) y).symm
simp
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_apply (x : f α) : mapEquiv f e x = EquivFunctor.map e x :=
rfl
theorem mapEquiv_symm_apply (y : f β) : (mapEquiv f e).symm y = EquivFunctor.map e.symm y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl (α) : mapEquiv f (Equiv.refl α) = Equiv.refl (f α) := by
ext; simp [mapEquiv]
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm : (mapEquiv f e).symm = mapEquiv f e.symm :=
Equiv.ext <| mapEquiv_symm_apply f e
/-- The composition of `mapEquiv`s is carried over the `EquivFunctor`.
For plain `Functor`s, this lemma is named `map_map` when applied
or `map_comp_map` when not applied.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_trans {γ : Type u₀} (ab : α ≃ β) (bc : β ≃ γ) :
(mapEquiv f ab).trans (mapEquiv f bc) = mapEquiv f (ab.trans bc) :=
Equiv.ext fun x => by simp [mapEquiv, map_trans']
end
instance (priority := 100) ofLawfulFunctor (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) [Functor f] [LawfulFunctor f] :
EquivFunctor f where
map {_ _} e := Functor.map e
map_refl' α := by
ext
apply LawfulFunctor.id_map
map_trans' {α β γ} k h := by
ext x
apply LawfulFunctor.comp_map k h x
theorem mapEquiv.injective (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁)
[Applicative f] [LawfulApplicative f] {α β : Type u₀}
(h : ∀ γ, Function.Injective (pure : γ → f γ)) :
Function.Injective (@EquivFunctor.mapEquiv f _ α β) :=
fun e₁ e₂ H =>
Equiv.ext fun x => h β (by simpa [EquivFunctor.map] using Equiv.congr_fun H (pure x))
end EquivFunctor
| Mathlib/Control/EquivFunctor.lean | 102 | 107 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Synonym
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Midpoint
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Slope
/-!
# Ordered modules as affine spaces
In this file we prove some theorems about `slope` and `lineMap` in the case when the module `E`
acting on the codomain `PE` of a function is an ordered module over its domain `k`. We also prove
inequalities that can be used to link convexity of a function on an interval to monotonicity of the
slope, see section docstring below for details.
## Implementation notes
We do not introduce the notion of ordered affine spaces (yet?). Instead, we prove various theorems
for an ordered module interpreted as an affine space.
## Tags
affine space, ordered module, slope
-/
open AffineMap
variable {k E PE : Type*}
/-!
### Monotonicity of `lineMap`
In this section we prove that `lineMap a b r` is monotone (strictly or not) in its arguments if
other arguments belong to specific domains.
-/
section OrderedRing
variable [Ring k] [PartialOrder k] [IsOrderedRing k]
[AddCommGroup E] [PartialOrder E] [IsOrderedAddMonoid E] [Module k E] [OrderedSMul k E]
variable {a a' b b' : E} {r r' : k}
theorem lineMap_mono_left (ha : a ≤ a') (hr : r ≤ 1) : lineMap a b r ≤ lineMap a' b r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
exact add_le_add_right (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left ha (sub_nonneg.2 hr)) _
theorem lineMap_strict_mono_left (ha : a < a') (hr : r < 1) : lineMap a b r < lineMap a' b r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
exact add_lt_add_right (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left ha (sub_pos.2 hr)) _
| omit [IsOrderedRing k] in
theorem lineMap_mono_right (hb : b ≤ b') (hr : 0 ≤ r) : lineMap a b r ≤ lineMap a b' r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Ordered.lean | 57 | 59 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PartialSups
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Fin
/-!
# Making a sequence disjoint
This file defines the way to make a sequence of sets - or, more generally, a map from a partially
ordered type `ι` into a (generalized) Boolean algebra `α` - into a *pairwise disjoint* sequence with
the same partial sups.
For a sequence `f : ℕ → α`, this new sequence will be `f 0`, `f 1 \ f 0`, `f 2 \ (f 0 ⊔ f 1) ⋯`.
It is actually unique, as `disjointed_unique` shows.
## Main declarations
* `disjointed f`: The map sending `i` to `f i \ (⨆ j < i, f j)`. We require the index type to be a
`LocallyFiniteOrderBot` to ensure that the supremum is well defined.
* `partialSups_disjointed`: `disjointed f` has the same partial sups as `f`.
* `disjoint_disjointed`: The elements of `disjointed f` are pairwise disjoint.
* `disjointed_unique`: `disjointed f` is the only pairwise disjoint sequence having the same partial
sups as `f`.
* `Fintype.sup_disjointed` (for finite `ι`) or `iSup_disjointed` (for complete `α`):
`disjointed f` has the same supremum as `f`. Limiting case of `partialSups_disjointed`.
* `Fintype.exists_disjointed_le`: for any finite family `f : ι → α`, there exists a pairwise
disjoint family `g : ι → α` which is bounded above by `f` and has the same supremum. This is
an analogue of `disjointed` for arbitrary finite index types (but without any uniqueness).
We also provide set notation variants of some lemmas.
-/
assert_not_exists SuccAddOrder
open Finset Order
variable {α ι : Type*}
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
section Preorder -- the *index type* is a preorder
variable [Preorder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι]
/-- The function mapping `i` to `f i \ (⨆ j < i, f j)`. When `ι` is a partial order, this is the
unique function `g` having the same `partialSups` as `f` and such that `g i` and `g j` are
disjoint whenever `i < j`. -/
def disjointed (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : α := f i \ (Iio i).sup f
lemma disjointed_apply (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : disjointed f i = f i \ (Iio i).sup f := rfl
lemma disjointed_of_isMin (f : ι → α) {i : ι} (hn : IsMin i) :
disjointed f i = f i := by
have : Iio i = ∅ := by rwa [← Finset.coe_eq_empty, coe_Iio, Set.Iio_eq_empty_iff]
simp only [disjointed_apply, this, sup_empty, sdiff_bot]
@[simp] lemma disjointed_bot [OrderBot ι] (f : ι → α) : disjointed f ⊥ = f ⊥ :=
disjointed_of_isMin _ isMin_bot
theorem disjointed_le_id : disjointed ≤ (id : (ι → α) → ι → α) :=
fun _ _ ↦ sdiff_le
theorem disjointed_le (f : ι → α) : disjointed f ≤ f :=
disjointed_le_id f
theorem disjoint_disjointed_of_lt (f : ι → α) {i j : ι} (h : i < j) :
Disjoint (disjointed f i) (disjointed f j) :=
(disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left <| le_sup (mem_Iio.mpr h)).mono_left (disjointed_le f i)
lemma disjointed_eq_self {f : ι → α} {i : ι} (hf : ∀ j < i, Disjoint (f j) (f i)) :
disjointed f i = f i := by
rw [disjointed_apply, sdiff_eq_left, disjoint_iff, sup_inf_distrib_left,
sup_congr rfl <| fun j hj ↦ disjoint_iff.mp <| (hf _ (mem_Iio.mp hj)).symm]
exact sup_bot _
/- NB: The original statement for `ι = ℕ` was a `def` and worked for `p : α → Sort*`. I couldn't
prove the `Sort*` version for general `ι`, but all instances of `disjointedRec` in the library are
for Prop anyway. -/
/--
An induction principle for `disjointed`. To prove something about `disjointed f i`, it's
enough to prove it for `f i` and being able to extend through diffs.
-/
lemma disjointedRec {f : ι → α} {p : α → Prop} (hdiff : ∀ ⦃t i⦄, p t → p (t \ f i)) :
∀ ⦃i⦄, p (f i) → p (disjointed f i) := by
classical
intro i hpi
rw [disjointed]
suffices ∀ (s : Finset ι), p (f i \ s.sup f) from this _
intro s
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simpa only [sup_empty, sdiff_bot] using hpi
| insert _ _ ht IH =>
rw [sup_insert, sup_comm, ← sdiff_sdiff]
exact hdiff IH
end Preorder
section PartialOrder -- the index type is a partial order
variable [PartialOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι]
@[simp]
theorem partialSups_disjointed (f : ι → α) :
partialSups (disjointed f) = partialSups f := by
-- This seems to be much more awkward than the case of linear orders, because the supremum
-- in the definition of `disjointed` can involve multiple "paths" through the poset.
classical
-- We argue by induction on the size of `Iio i`.
suffices ∀ r i (hi : #(Iio i) ≤ r), partialSups (disjointed f) i = partialSups f i from
OrderHom.ext _ _ (funext fun i ↦ this _ i le_rfl)
intro r i hi
induction r generalizing i with
| zero =>
-- Base case: `n` is minimal, so `partialSups f i = partialSups (disjointed f) n = f i`.
simp only [Nat.le_zero, card_eq_zero] at hi
simp only [partialSups_apply, Iic_eq_cons_Iio, hi, disjointed_apply, sup'_eq_sup, sup_cons,
sup_empty, sdiff_bot]
| succ n ih =>
-- Induction step: first WLOG arrange that `#(Iio i) = r + 1`
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hi with hn | hn
· exact ih _ <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ hn
simp only [partialSups_apply (disjointed f), Iic_eq_cons_Iio, sup'_eq_sup, sup_cons]
-- Key claim: we can write `Iio i` as a union of (finitely many) `Ici` intervals.
have hun : (Iio i).biUnion Iic = Iio i := by
ext r; simpa using ⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ha.2.trans_lt ha.1, fun hr ↦ ⟨r, hr, le_rfl⟩⟩
-- Use claim and `sup_biUnion` to rewrite the supremum in the definition of `disjointed f`
-- in terms of suprema over `Iic`'s. Then the RHS is a `sup` over `partialSups`, which we
-- can rewrite via the induction hypothesis.
rw [← hun, sup_biUnion, sup_congr rfl (g := partialSups f)]
· simp only [funext (partialSups_apply f), sup'_eq_sup, ← sup_biUnion, hun]
simp only [disjointed, sdiff_sup_self, Iic_eq_cons_Iio, sup_cons]
· simp only [partialSups, sup'_eq_sup, OrderHom.coe_mk] at ih ⊢
refine fun x hx ↦ ih x ?_
-- Remains to show `∀ x in Iio i, #(Iio x) ≤ r`.
rw [← Nat.lt_add_one_iff, ← hn]
apply lt_of_lt_of_le (b := #(Iic x))
· simpa only [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, card_cons] using Nat.lt_succ_self _
· refine card_le_card (fun r hr ↦ ?_)
simp only [mem_Iic, mem_Iio] at hx hr ⊢
exact hr.trans_lt hx
lemma Fintype.sup_disjointed [Fintype ι] (f : ι → α) :
univ.sup (disjointed f) = univ.sup f := by
classical
have hun : univ.biUnion Iic = (univ : Finset ι) := by
ext r; simpa only [mem_biUnion, mem_univ, mem_Iic, true_and, iff_true] using ⟨r, le_rfl⟩
rw [← hun, sup_biUnion, sup_biUnion, sup_congr rfl (fun i _ ↦ ?_)]
rw [← sup'_eq_sup nonempty_Iic, ← sup'_eq_sup nonempty_Iic,
← partialSups_apply, ← partialSups_apply, partialSups_disjointed]
lemma disjointed_partialSups (f : ι → α) :
disjointed (partialSups f) = disjointed f := by
classical
ext i
have step1 : f i \ (Iio i).sup f = partialSups f i \ (Iio i).sup f := by
rw [sdiff_eq_symm (sdiff_le.trans (le_partialSups f i))]
simp only [funext (partialSups_apply f), sup'_eq_sup]
rw [sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup (sup_mono Iio_subset_Iic_self), sup_eq_right]
simp only [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, sup_cons, sup_sdiff_left_self, sdiff_le_iff, le_sup_right]
simp only [disjointed_apply, step1, funext (partialSups_apply f), sup'_eq_sup, ← sup_biUnion]
congr 2 with r
simpa only [mem_biUnion, mem_Iio, mem_Iic] using
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ha.2.trans_lt ha.1, fun hr ↦ ⟨r, hr, le_rfl⟩⟩
/-- `disjointed f` is the unique map `d : ι → α` such that `d` has the same partial sups as `f`,
and `d i` and `d j` are disjoint whenever `i < j`. -/
theorem disjointed_unique {f d : ι → α} (hdisj : ∀ {i j : ι} (_ : i < j), Disjoint (d i) (d j))
(hsups : partialSups d = partialSups f) :
d = disjointed f := by
rw [← disjointed_partialSups, ← hsups, disjointed_partialSups]
| exact funext fun _ ↦ (disjointed_eq_self (fun _ hj ↦ hdisj hj)).symm
end PartialOrder
| Mathlib/Order/Disjointed.lean | 178 | 181 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
/-!
# Midpoint of a segment
## Main definitions
* `midpoint R x y`: midpoint of the segment `[x, y]`. We define it for `x` and `y`
in a module over a ring `R` with invertible `2`.
* `AddMonoidHom.ofMapMidpoint`: construct an `AddMonoidHom` given a map `f` such that
`f` sends zero to zero and midpoints to midpoints.
## Main theorems
* `midpoint_eq_iff`: `z` is the midpoint of `[x, y]` if and only if `x + y = z + z`,
* `midpoint_unique`: `midpoint R x y` does not depend on `R`;
* `midpoint x y` is linear both in `x` and `y`;
* `pointReflection_midpoint_left`, `pointReflection_midpoint_right`:
`Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)` swaps `x` and `y`.
We do not mark most lemmas as `@[simp]` because it is hard to tell which side is simpler.
## Tags
midpoint, AddMonoidHom
-/
open AffineMap AffineEquiv
section
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*} [Ring R] [Invertible (2 : R)] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module R V] [AddTorsor V P] [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- `midpoint x y` is the midpoint of the segment `[x, y]`. -/
def midpoint (x y : P) : P :=
lineMap x y (⅟ 2 : R)
variable {R} {x y z : P}
@[simp]
theorem AffineMap.map_midpoint (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (a b : P) :
f (midpoint R a b) = midpoint R (f a) (f b) :=
f.apply_lineMap a b _
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.map_midpoint (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') (a b : P) :
f (midpoint R a b) = midpoint R (f a) (f b) :=
f.apply_lineMap a b _
theorem AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left (x y : P) :
pointReflection R (midpoint R x y) x = y := by
rw [midpoint, pointReflection_apply, lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub, vadd_vadd, ← add_smul, ← two_mul,
mul_invOf_self, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left (x y : P) :
(Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)) x = y := by
rw [midpoint, pointReflection_apply, lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub, vadd_vadd, ← add_smul, ← two_mul,
mul_invOf_self, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
theorem midpoint_comm (x y : P) : midpoint R x y = midpoint R y x := by
rw [midpoint, ← lineMap_apply_one_sub, one_sub_invOf_two, midpoint]
theorem AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right (x y : P) :
pointReflection R (midpoint R x y) y = x := by
rw [midpoint_comm, AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left]
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right (x y : P) :
| (Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)) y = x := by
rw [midpoint_comm, Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Midpoint.lean | 77 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol
/-!
# A `norm_num` extension for Jacobi and Legendre symbols
We extend the `norm_num` tactic so that it can be used to provably compute
the value of the Jacobi symbol `J(a | b)` or the Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` when
the arguments are numerals.
## Implementation notes
We use the Law of Quadratic Reciprocity for the Jacobi symbol to compute the value of `J(a | b)`
efficiently, roughly comparable in effort with the euclidean algorithm for the computation
of the gcd of `a` and `b`. More precisely, the computation is done in the following steps.
* Use `J(a | 0) = 1` (an artifact of the definition) and `J(a | 1) = 1` to deal
with corner cases.
* Use `J(a | b) = J(a % b | b)` to reduce to the case that `a` is a natural number.
We define a version of the Jacobi symbol restricted to natural numbers for use in
the following steps; see `NormNum.jacobiSymNat`. (But we'll continue to write `J(a | b)`
in this description.)
* Remove powers of two from `b`. This is done via `J(2a | 2b) = 0` and
`J(2a+1 | 2b) = J(2a+1 | b)` (another artifact of the definition).
* Now `0 ≤ a < b` and `b` is odd. If `b = 1`, then the value is `1`.
If `a = 0` (and `b > 1`), then the value is `0`. Otherwise, we remove powers of two from `a`
via `J(4a | b) = J(a | b)` and `J(2a | b) = ±J(a | b)`, where the sign is determined
by the residue class of `b` mod 8, to reduce to `a` odd.
* Once `a` is odd, we use Quadratic Reciprocity (QR) in the form
`J(a | b) = ±J(b % a | a)`, where the sign is determined by the residue classes
of `a` and `b` mod 4. We are then back in the previous case.
We provide customized versions of these results for the various reduction steps,
where we encode the residue classes mod 2, mod 4, or mod 8 by using hypotheses like
`a % n = b`. In this way, the only divisions we have to compute and prove
are the ones occurring in the use of QR above.
-/
section Lemmas
namespace Mathlib.Meta.NormNum
/-- The Jacobi symbol restricted to natural numbers in both arguments. -/
def jacobiSymNat (a b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
jacobiSym a b
/-!
### API Lemmas
We repeat part of the API for `jacobiSym` with `NormNum.jacobiSymNat` and without implicit
arguments, in a form that is suitable for constructing proofs in `norm_num`.
-/
/-- Base cases: `b = 0`, `b = 1`, `a = 0`, `a = 1`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.zero_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 0 = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.zero_right]
theorem jacobiSymNat.one_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 1 = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.one_right]
theorem jacobiSymNat.zero_left (b : ℕ) (hb : Nat.beq (b / 2) 0 = false) : jacobiSymNat 0 b = 0 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, Nat.cast_zero, jacobiSym.zero_left ?_]
calc
1 < 2 * 1 := by decide
_ ≤ 2 * (b / 2) :=
Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.succ_le.mpr (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_of_beq_eq_false hb)))
_ ≤ b := Nat.mul_div_le b 2
theorem jacobiSymNat.one_left (b : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat 1 b = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, Nat.cast_one, jacobiSym.one_left]
/-- Turn a Legendre symbol into a Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem LegendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) (pp : Fact p.Prime) (a r : ℤ)
(hr : IsInt (jacobiSym a p) r) : IsInt (legendreSym p a) r := by
rwa [@jacobiSym.legendreSym.to_jacobiSym p pp a]
|
/-- The value depends only on the residue class of `a` mod `b`. -/
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean | 86 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Support
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
/-!
# Trailing degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `trailingDegree p`: the multiplicity of `X` in the polynomial `p`
* `natTrailingDegree`: a variant of `trailingDegree` that takes values in the natural numbers
* `trailingCoeff`: the coefficient at index `natTrailingDegree p`
Converts most results about `degree`, `natDegree` and `leadingCoeff` to results about the bottom
end of a polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `trailingDegree p` is the multiplicity of `x` in the polynomial `p`, i.e. the smallest
`X`-exponent in `p`.
`trailingDegree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the smallest power of `X` that appears
in `p`, otherwise
`trailingDegree 0 = ⊤`. -/
def trailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ∞ :=
p.support.min
theorem trailingDegree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q :=
InvImage.wf trailingDegree wellFounded_lt
/-- `natTrailingDegree p` forces `trailingDegree p` to `ℕ`, by defining
`natTrailingDegree ⊤ = 0`. -/
def natTrailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
ENat.toNat (trailingDegree p)
/-- `trailingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the smallest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def trailingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natTrailingDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `monic_at` if its trailing coefficient is 1 -/
def TrailingMonic (p : R[X]) :=
trailingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem TrailingMonic.def : TrailingMonic p ↔ trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance TrailingMonic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (TrailingMonic p) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (trailingCoeff p = (1 : R))
@[simp]
theorem TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.TrailingMonic) : trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_zero : trailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_zero : trailingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_zero : natTrailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_top : trailingDegree p = ⊤ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.min_eq_top.1 h), fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree p = (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) :=
.symm <| ENat.coe_toNat <| mt trailingDegree_eq_top.1 hp
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_inj]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, ENat.toNat_eq_iff hn]
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(h : trailingDegree p = n) : natTrailingDegree p = n := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, h]
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree : ↑(natTrailingDegree p) ≤ trailingDegree p :=
ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]}
(h : trailingDegree p = trailingDegree q) : natTrailingDegree p = natTrailingDegree q := by
unfold natTrailingDegree
rw [h]
theorem trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : trailingDegree p ≤ n :=
min_le (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree p ≤ n :=
ENat.toNat_le_of_le_coe <| trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
@[simp] lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro h
by_contra hp
obtain ⟨n, hpn, hn⟩ := by simpa using min_mem_image_coe <| support_nonempty.2 hp
obtain rfl := (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).1 hn.symm
exact hpn h
· rintro rfl
simp
lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
lemma trailingDegree_eq_zero : trailingDegree p = 0 ↔ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 :=
Finset.min_eq_bot.trans mem_support_iff
@[simp] lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : natTrailingDegree p = 0 ↔ p = 0 ∨ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, or_comm]
lemma natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : natTrailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not.trans <| by rw [not_or, not_ne_iff]
lemma trailingDegree_ne_zero : trailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
trailingDegree_eq_zero.not_left
@[simp] theorem trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree (h : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree q ≤ trailingDegree p :=
(trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h).trans natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne {n : ℕ} :
p.natTrailingDegree ≠ n → trailingDegree p ≠ n :=
mt fun h => by rw [natTrailingDegree, h, ENat.toNat_coe]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le {n : ℕ} {hp : p ≠ 0}
(H : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree p) : n ≤ natTrailingDegree p := by
rwa [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_le] at H
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree (hq : q ≠ 0)
(hpq : p.trailingDegree ≤ q.trailingDegree) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ q.natTrailingDegree :=
ENat.toNat_le_toNat hpq <| by simpa
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [trailingDegree, support_monomial n ha, min_singleton]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial_le : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (natTrailingDegree_monomial ha).le
theorem le_trailingDegree_monomial : ↑n ≤ trailingDegree (monomial n a) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (trailingDegree_monomial ha).ge
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
trailingDegree_monomial ha
theorem le_trailingDegree_C : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem trailingDegree_one_le : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (1 : R[X]) := by
rw [← C_1]
exact le_trailingDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_C (a : R) : natTrailingDegree (C a) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_one : natTrailingDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_C 1
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natTrailingDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natTrailingDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
theorem le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
exact le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree (h : (n : ℕ∞) < trailingDegree p) : coeff p n = 0 :=
Classical.not_not.1 (mt trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (not_le_of_gt h))
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : n < p.natTrailingDegree) :
p.coeff n = 0 := by
apply coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, trailingDegree_zero]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_top n
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_coe.2 h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natTrailingDegree_pred_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {hp : (0 : ℕ∞) < natTrailingDegree p} :
p.coeff (p.natTrailingDegree - 1) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree <|
Nat.sub_lt (WithTop.coe_pos.mp hp) Nat.one_pos
theorem le_trailingDegree_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X ^ n : R[X]) := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow n (1 : R)
theorem le_trailingDegree_X : (1 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X : R[X]) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natTrailingDegree ≤ 1 :=
natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_eq_zero : trailingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
_root_.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h)
(mem_of_min (trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
|
theorem trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero : trailingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/TrailingDegree.lean | 245 | 246 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.GaussianIntegral
/-! # Convexity properties of the Gamma function
In this file, we prove that `Gamma` and `log ∘ Gamma` are convex functions on the positive real
line. We then prove the Bohr-Mollerup theorem, which characterises `Gamma` as the *unique*
positive-real-valued, log-convex function on the positive reals satisfying `f (x + 1) = x f x` and
`f 1 = 1`.
The proof of the Bohr-Mollerup theorem is bound up with the proof of (a weak form of) the Euler
limit formula, `Real.BohrMollerup.tendsto_logGammaSeq`, stating that for positive
real `x` the sequence `x * log n + log n! - ∑ (m : ℕ) ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), log (x + m)`
tends to `log Γ(x)` as `n → ∞`. We prove that any function satisfying the hypotheses of the
Bohr-Mollerup theorem must agree with the limit in the Euler limit formula, so there is at most one
such function; then we show that `Γ` satisfies these conditions.
Since most of the auxiliary lemmas for the Bohr-Mollerup theorem are of no relevance outside the
context of this proof, we place them in a separate namespace `Real.BohrMollerup` to avoid clutter.
(This includes the logarithmic form of the Euler limit formula, since later we will prove a more
general form of the Euler limit formula valid for any real or complex `x`; see
`Real.Gamma_seq_tendsto_Gamma` and `Complex.Gamma_seq_tendsto_Gamma` in the file
`Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Beta.lean`.)
As an application of the Bohr-Mollerup theorem we prove the Legendre doubling formula for the
Gamma function for real positive `s` (which will be upgraded to a proof for all complex `s` in a
later file).
TODO: This argument can be extended to prove the general `k`-multiplication formula (at least up
to a constant, and it should be possible to deduce the value of this constant using Stirling's
formula).
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Set MeasureTheory
open scoped Nat ENNReal Topology Real
namespace Real
section Convexity
/-- Log-convexity of the Gamma function on the positive reals (stated in multiplicative form),
proved using the Hölder inequality applied to Euler's integral. -/
theorem Gamma_mul_add_mul_le_rpow_Gamma_mul_rpow_Gamma {s t a b : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) (ht : 0 < t)
(ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
Gamma (a * s + b * t) ≤ Gamma s ^ a * Gamma t ^ b := by
-- We will apply Hölder's inequality, for the conjugate exponents `p = 1 / a`
-- and `q = 1 / b`, to the functions `f a s` and `f b t`, where `f` is as follows:
let f : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ → ℝ := fun c u x => exp (-c * x) * x ^ (c * (u - 1))
have e : HolderConjugate (1 / a) (1 / b) := Real.holderConjugate_one_div ha hb hab
have hab' : b = 1 - a := by linarith
have hst : 0 < a * s + b * t := by positivity
-- some properties of f:
have posf : ∀ c u x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioi (0 : ℝ) → 0 ≤ f c u x := fun c u x hx =>
mul_nonneg (exp_pos _).le (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _).le
have posf' : ∀ c u : ℝ, ∀ᵐ x : ℝ ∂volume.restrict (Ioi 0), 0 ≤ f c u x := fun c u =>
(ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr (ae_of_all _ (posf c u))
have fpow :
∀ {c x : ℝ} (_ : 0 < c) (u : ℝ) (_ : 0 < x), exp (-x) * x ^ (u - 1) = f c u x ^ (1 / c) := by
intro c x hc u hx
dsimp only [f]
rw [mul_rpow (exp_pos _).le ((rpow_nonneg hx.le) _), ← exp_mul, ← rpow_mul hx.le]
congr 2 <;> field_simp [hc.ne']; ring
-- show `f c u` is in `ℒp` for `p = 1/c`:
have f_mem_Lp :
∀ {c u : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hu : 0 < u),
MemLp (f c u) (ENNReal.ofReal (1 / c)) (volume.restrict (Ioi 0)) := by
intro c u hc hu
have A : ENNReal.ofReal (1 / c) ≠ 0 := by
rwa [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le, one_div_pos]
have B : ENNReal.ofReal (1 / c) ≠ ∞ := ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
rw [← memLp_norm_rpow_iff _ A B, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (one_div_nonneg.mpr hc.le),
ENNReal.div_self A B, memLp_one_iff_integrable]
· apply Integrable.congr (GammaIntegral_convergent hu)
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (self_mem_ae_restrict measurableSet_Ioi) fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [fpow hc u hx]
congr 1
exact (norm_of_nonneg (posf _ _ x hx)).symm
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
refine (Continuous.continuousOn ?_).mul (continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun x hx => ?_)
· exact continuous_exp.comp (continuous_const.mul continuous_id')
· exact continuousAt_rpow_const _ _ (Or.inl (mem_Ioi.mp hx).ne')
-- now apply Hölder:
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs, Gamma_eq_integral ht, Gamma_eq_integral hst]
convert
MeasureTheory.integral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_nonneg e (posf' a s) (posf' b t) (f_mem_Lp ha hs)
(f_mem_Lp hb ht) using
1
· refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
have A : exp (-x) = exp (-a * x) * exp (-b * x) := by
rw [← exp_add, ← add_mul, ← neg_add, hab, neg_one_mul]
have B : x ^ (a * s + b * t - 1) = x ^ (a * (s - 1)) * x ^ (b * (t - 1)) := by
rw [← rpow_add hx, hab']; congr 1; ring
rw [A, B]
ring
· rw [one_div_one_div, one_div_one_div]
congr 2 <;> exact setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => fpow (by assumption) _ hx
theorem convexOn_log_Gamma : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) (log ∘ Gamma) := by
refine convexOn_iff_forall_pos.mpr ⟨convex_Ioi _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
have : b = 1 - a := by linarith
subst this
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, smul_eq_mul]
simp only [mem_Ioi] at hx hy
rw [← log_rpow, ← log_rpow, ← log_mul]
· gcongr
exact Gamma_mul_add_mul_le_rpow_Gamma_mul_rpow_Gamma hx hy ha hb hab
all_goals positivity
theorem convexOn_Gamma : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) Gamma := by
refine
((convexOn_exp.subset (subset_univ _) ?_).comp convexOn_log_Gamma
(exp_monotone.monotoneOn _)).congr
fun x hx => exp_log (Gamma_pos_of_pos hx)
rw [convex_iff_isPreconnected]
refine isPreconnected_Ioi.image _ fun x hx => ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt ?_
refine (differentiableAt_Gamma fun m => ?_).continuousAt.log (Gamma_pos_of_pos hx).ne'
exact (neg_lt_iff_pos_add.mpr (add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (mem_Ioi.mp hx) (Nat.cast_nonneg m))).ne'
end Convexity
section BohrMollerup
namespace BohrMollerup
/-- The function `n ↦ x log n + log n! - (log x + ... + log (x + n))`, which we will show tends to
`log (Gamma x)` as `n → ∞`. -/
def logGammaSeq (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
x * log n + log n ! - ∑ m ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), log (x + m)
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ}
theorem f_nat_eq (hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
f n = f 1 + log (n - 1)! := by
refine Nat.le_induction (by simp) (fun m hm IH => ?_) n (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn)
have A : 0 < (m : ℝ) := Nat.cast_pos.2 hm
simp only [hf_feq A, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero]
rw [IH, add_assoc, ← log_mul (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (Nat.factorial_ne_zero _)) A.ne', ←
Nat.cast_mul]
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hm, Nat.factorial_succ, mul_comm]
congr
exact (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hm).symm
theorem f_add_nat_eq (hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hx : 0 < x) (n : ℕ) :
f (x + n) = f x + ∑ m ∈ Finset.range n, log (x + m) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn =>
have : x + n.succ = x + n + 1 := by push_cast; ring
rw [this, hf_feq, hn]
· rw [Finset.range_succ, Finset.sum_insert Finset.not_mem_range_self]
abel
· linarith [(Nat.cast_nonneg n : 0 ≤ (n : ℝ))]
/-- Linear upper bound for `f (x + n)` on unit interval -/
theorem f_add_nat_le (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hn : n ≠ 0) (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x ≤ 1) :
f (n + x) ≤ f n + x * log n := by
have hn' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := Nat.cast_pos.mpr (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
have : f n + x * log n = (1 - x) * f n + x * f (n + 1) := by rw [hf_feq hn']; ring
rw [this, (by ring : (n : ℝ) + x = (1 - x) * n + x * (n + 1))]
simpa only [smul_eq_mul] using
hf_conv.2 hn' (by linarith : 0 < (n + 1 : ℝ)) (by linarith : 0 ≤ 1 - x) hx.le (by linarith)
/-- Linear lower bound for `f (x + n)` on unit interval -/
theorem f_add_nat_ge (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hn : 2 ≤ n) (hx : 0 < x) :
f n + x * log (n - 1) ≤ f (n + x) := by
have npos : 0 < (n : ℝ) - 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, sub_pos, Nat.cast_lt]; omega
have c :=
(convexOn_iff_slope_mono_adjacent.mp <| hf_conv).2 npos (by linarith : 0 < (n : ℝ) + x)
(by linarith : (n : ℝ) - 1 < (n : ℝ)) (by linarith)
rw [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_sub_cancel, div_one] at c
have : f (↑n - 1) = f n - log (↑n - 1) := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← hf_feq npos, sub_add_cancel]
rwa [this, le_div_iff₀ hx, sub_sub_cancel, le_sub_iff_add_le, mul_comm _ x, add_comm] at c
theorem logGammaSeq_add_one (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
logGammaSeq (x + 1) n = logGammaSeq x (n + 1) + log x - (x + 1) * (log (n + 1) - log n) := by
dsimp only [Nat.factorial_succ, logGammaSeq]
conv_rhs => rw [Finset.sum_range_succ', Nat.cast_zero, add_zero]
rw [Nat.cast_mul, log_mul]; rotate_left
· rw [Nat.cast_ne_zero]; exact Nat.succ_ne_zero n
· rw [Nat.cast_ne_zero]; exact Nat.factorial_ne_zero n
have :
∑ m ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), log (x + 1 + ↑m) =
∑ k ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), log (x + ↑(k + 1)) := by
congr! 2 with m
push_cast
abel
rw [← this, Nat.cast_add_one n]
ring
theorem le_logGammaSeq (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) :
f x ≤ f 1 + x * log (n + 1) - x * log n + logGammaSeq x n := by
rw [logGammaSeq, ← add_sub_assoc, le_sub_iff_add_le, ← f_add_nat_eq (@hf_feq) hx, add_comm x]
refine (f_add_nat_le hf_conv (@hf_feq) (Nat.add_one_ne_zero n) hx hx').trans (le_of_eq ?_)
rw [f_nat_eq @hf_feq (by omega : n + 1 ≠ 0), Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.cast_add_one]
ring
theorem ge_logGammaSeq (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hx : 0 < x) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
f 1 + logGammaSeq x n ≤ f x := by
dsimp [logGammaSeq]
rw [← add_sub_assoc, sub_le_iff_le_add, ← f_add_nat_eq (@hf_feq) hx, add_comm x _]
refine le_trans (le_of_eq ?_) (f_add_nat_ge hf_conv @hf_feq ?_ hx)
· rw [f_nat_eq @hf_feq, Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.cast_add_one, add_sub_cancel_right]
· ring
· exact Nat.succ_ne_zero _
· omega
theorem tendsto_logGammaSeq_of_le_one (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x ≤ 1) :
Tendsto (logGammaSeq x) atTop (𝓝 <| f x - f 1) := by
refine tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' (f := logGammaSeq x)
(g := fun n ↦ f x - f 1 - x * (log (n + 1) - log n)) ?_ tendsto_const_nhds ?_ ?_
· have : f x - f 1 = f x - f 1 - x * 0 := by ring
nth_rw 2 [this]
exact Tendsto.sub tendsto_const_nhds (tendsto_log_nat_add_one_sub_log.const_mul _)
· filter_upwards with n
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', sub_le_iff_le_add']
convert le_logGammaSeq hf_conv (@hf_feq) hx hx' n using 1
ring
· show ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, logGammaSeq x n ≤ f x - f 1
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with n hn using
le_sub_iff_add_le'.mpr (ge_logGammaSeq hf_conv hf_feq hx hn)
theorem tendsto_logGammaSeq (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hx : 0 < x) :
Tendsto (logGammaSeq x) atTop (𝓝 <| f x - f 1) := by
suffices ∀ m : ℕ, ↑m < x → x ≤ m + 1 → Tendsto (logGammaSeq x) atTop (𝓝 <| f x - f 1) by
refine this ⌈x - 1⌉₊ ?_ ?_
· rcases lt_or_le x 1 with ⟨⟩
· rwa [Nat.ceil_eq_zero.mpr (by linarith : x - 1 ≤ 0), Nat.cast_zero]
· convert Nat.ceil_lt_add_one (by linarith : 0 ≤ x - 1)
abel
· rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add]; exact Nat.le_ceil _
intro m
induction' m with m hm generalizing x
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_add]
exact fun _ hx' => tendsto_logGammaSeq_of_le_one hf_conv (@hf_feq) hx hx'
· intro hy hy'
rw [Nat.cast_succ, ← sub_le_iff_le_add] at hy'
rw [Nat.cast_succ, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt] at hy
specialize hm ((Nat.cast_nonneg _).trans_lt hy) hy hy'
-- now massage gauss_product n (x - 1) into gauss_product (n - 1) x
have :
∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop,
logGammaSeq (x - 1) n =
logGammaSeq x (n - 1) + x * (log (↑(n - 1) + 1) - log ↑(n - 1)) - log (x - 1) := by
refine Eventually.mp (eventually_ge_atTop 1) (Eventually.of_forall fun n hn => ?_)
have := logGammaSeq_add_one (x - 1) (n - 1)
rw [sub_add_cancel, Nat.sub_add_cancel hn] at this
rw [this]
ring
replace hm :=
((Tendsto.congr' this hm).add (tendsto_const_nhds : Tendsto (fun _ => log (x - 1)) _ _)).comp
(tendsto_add_atTop_nat 1)
have :
((fun x_1 : ℕ =>
(fun n : ℕ =>
logGammaSeq x (n - 1) + x * (log (↑(n - 1) + 1) - log ↑(n - 1)) - log (x - 1))
x_1 +
(fun b : ℕ => log (x - 1)) x_1) ∘
fun a : ℕ => a + 1) =
fun n => logGammaSeq x n + x * (log (↑n + 1) - log ↑n) := by
ext1 n
dsimp only [Function.comp_apply]
rw [sub_add_cancel, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
rw [this] at hm
convert hm.sub (tendsto_log_nat_add_one_sub_log.const_mul x) using 2
· ring
· have := hf_feq ((Nat.cast_nonneg m).trans_lt hy)
rw [sub_add_cancel] at this
rw [this]
ring
theorem tendsto_log_gamma {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) :
| Tendsto (logGammaSeq x) atTop (𝓝 <| log (Gamma x)) := by
have : log (Gamma x) = (log ∘ Gamma) x - (log ∘ Gamma) 1 := by
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, Gamma_one, log_one, sub_zero]
rw [this]
refine BohrMollerup.tendsto_logGammaSeq convexOn_log_Gamma (fun {y} hy => ?_) hx
rw [Function.comp_apply, Gamma_add_one hy.ne', log_mul hy.ne' (Gamma_pos_of_pos hy).ne', add_comm,
Function.comp_apply]
end BohrMollerup
-- (namespace)
/-- The **Bohr-Mollerup theorem**: the Gamma function is the *unique* log-convex, positive-valued
function on the positive reals which satisfies `f 1 = 1` and `f (x + 1) = x * f x` for all `x`. -/
theorem eq_Gamma_of_log_convex {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) (log ∘ f))
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = y * f y) (hf_pos : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → 0 < f y)
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/BohrMollerup.lean | 290 | 304 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Ultrafilter
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Ultrafilter
/-!
# Compact sets and compact spaces
## Main results
* `isCompact_univ_pi`: **Tychonov's theorem** - an arbitrary product of compact sets
is compact.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X} {f : X → Y}
-- compact sets
section Compact
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} [NeBot f] (hf : f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt {ι : Type*} (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter ι} [NeBot f]
{u : ι → X} (hf : Filter.map u f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x f u := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hl : ∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, ClusterPt a l :=
let ⟨a, has, ha⟩ := @hs _ (frequently_mem_iff_neBot.mp hl) inf_le_right
⟨a, has, ha.mono inf_le_left⟩
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, MapClusterPt a l f :=
hs.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently hf
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if it belongs to each filter
`𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t`
within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx => ?_
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a compact set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsCompact.induction_on (hs : IsCompact s) {p : Set X → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := comk p he (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht) (fun _s hs _t ht ↦ hunion hs ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a compact set and a closed set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_right (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_left))
have : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <|
hx.mono <| le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_right)
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, this⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_left (ht : IsCompact t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a compact set and an open set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.diff (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsCompact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsCompact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
theorem IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsCompact (f '' s) := by
intro l lne ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
theorem IsCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem IsCompact.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s)
(ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
Classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot fun (this : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥) =>
let ⟨x, hx, (hfx : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @hs _ ⟨this⟩ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (IsOpen.mem_nhds ht₁ this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine (forall_neBot_le_iff ?_).trans ?_
· rintro f g hle ⟨x, hxs, hxf⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxf.mono hle⟩
· simp only [Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds, _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds' :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds', _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'
/-- If a compact set belongs to a filter and this filter has a unique cluster point `y` in this set,
then the filter is less than or equal to `𝓝 y`. -/
lemma IsCompact.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(hmem : s ∈ l) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y := by
refine le_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf ↦ ?_
rcases hs.ultrafilter_le_nhds' f (hf hmem) with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩
convert ← hx
exact h x hxs (.mono (.of_le_nhds hx) hf)
/-- If values of `f : Y → X` belong to a compact set `s` eventually along a filter `l`
and `y` is a unique `MapClusterPt` for `f` along `l` in `s`,
then `f` tends to `𝓝 y` along `l`. -/
lemma IsCompact.tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt {Y} {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hmem : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
hs.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (mem_map.2 hmem) h
/-- For every open directed cover of a compact set, there exists a single element of the
cover which itself includes the set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_cover {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) (hdU : Directed (· ⊆ ·) U) :
∃ i, s ⊆ U i :=
hι.elim fun i₀ =>
IsCompact.induction_on hs ⟨i₀, empty_subset _⟩ (fun _ _ hs ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i, hs.trans hi⟩)
(fun _ _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩ := hdU i j
⟨k, union_subset (Subset.trans hi hki) (Subset.trans hj hkj)⟩)
fun _x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds (hUo i) hi), i, Subset.refl _⟩
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) : ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
hs.elim_directed_cover _ (fun _ => isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hUo i)
(iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset U ▸ hsU)
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h)
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x hx, U x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x.1 x.2) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩ with ⟨t, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hst hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hy⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hyt)
exact mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hy
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet (hs : IsCompact s) {U : X → Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (fun x _ => U x) hU
classical
exact ⟨t.image (↑), fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, _, hyx⟩ := Finset.mem_image.1 hx
hyx ▸ y.2,
by rwa [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]⟩
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' U hU).imp fun _ ↦ subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet hU).imp fun _ h ↦ h.imp_right subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x x.2 := by
choose V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover' V V_nhds).imp fun t ht =>
subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x _ => hV x x.2)
simpa [← iUnion_inter, ← iUnion_coe_set]
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
choose! V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover V V_nhds).imp fun t ⟨t_sub_s, ht⟩ =>
⟨t_sub_s, subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x hx => hV x (t_sub_s x hx))⟩
simpa [← iUnion_inter]
/-- The neighborhood filter of a compact set is disjoint with a filter `l` if and only if the
neighborhood filter of each point of this set is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H => ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx => (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx => (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx => hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂, biInter_finset_mem]
exact fun x hx => hUl x (hts x hx)
/-- A filter `l` is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of a compact set if and only if it is
disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point of this set. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every directed family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a single element of the family which itself avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅)
(hdt : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t) : ∃ i : ι, s ∩ t i = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
hs.elim_directed_cover (compl ∘ t) (fun i => (htc i).isOpen_compl)
(by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using hst)
(hdt.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => compl_subset_compl.mpr)
⟨t, by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using ht⟩
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
hs.elim_directed_family_closed _ (fun _ ↦ isClosed_biInter fun _ _ ↦ htc _)
(by rwa [← iInter_eq_iInter_finset])
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h ↦ biInter_subset_biInter_left h)
/-- To show that a compact set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every finite subfamily. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
exact hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed t htc hst
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `iInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set X) (htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t)
(htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i)) (htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) :
(⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
let i₀ := hι.some
suffices (t i₀ ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty by
rwa [inter_eq_right.mpr (iInter_subset _ i₀)] at this
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
apply mt ((htc i₀).elim_directed_family_closed t htcl)
push_neg
simp only [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
refine ⟨htd, fun i => ?_⟩
rcases htd i₀ i with ⟨j, hji₀, hji⟩
exact (htn j).mono (subset_inter hji₀ hji)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `sInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_sInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{S : Set (Set X)} [hS : Nonempty S] (hSd : DirectedOn (· ⊇ ·) S) (hSn : ∀ U ∈ S, U.Nonempty)
(hSc : ∀ U ∈ S, IsCompact U) (hScl : ∀ U ∈ S, IsClosed U) : (⋂₀ S).Nonempty := by
rw [sInter_eq_iInter]
exact IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _
(DirectedOn.directed_val hSd) (fun i ↦ hSn i i.2) (fun i ↦ hSc i i.2) (fun i ↦ hScl i i.2)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for sequences indexed by `ℕ`:
the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed (t : ℕ → Set X)
(htd : ∀ i, t (i + 1) ⊆ t i) (htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (ht0 : IsCompact (t 0))
(htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) : (⋂ i, t i).Nonempty :=
have tmono : Antitone t := antitone_nat_of_succ_le htd
have htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t := tmono.directed_ge
have : ∀ i, t i ⊆ t 0 := fun i => tmono <| Nat.zero_le i
have htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i) := fun i => ht0.of_isClosed_subset (htcl i) (this i)
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed t htd htn htc htcl
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Finite b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun i => c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d.toSet, ?_, d.finite_toSet.image _, ?_⟩
· simp
· rwa [biUnion_image]
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsCompact s := fun f hf hfs => by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x => (hU x).2, fun x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1⟩, fun t ht => ?_⟩
refine compl_not_mem (le_principal_iff.1 hfs) ?_
refine mem_of_superset ((biInter_finset_mem t).2 fun x _ => hUf x) ?_
rw [subset_compl_comm, compl_iInter₂]
simpa only [compl_compl]
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsCompact s :=
isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hsU => by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i => (U i)ᶜ) (fun i => (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subcover :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subcover, isCompact_of_finite_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ → ∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed, isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `𝓝 x ×ˢ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `t ∈ l` such that `U ×ˢ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall {K : Set X} {Y} {l : Filter Y} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ×ˢ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l := by
refine hK.induction_on (by simp) (fun t t' ht hs ↦ ?_) (fun t t' ht ht' ↦ ?_) fun x hx ↦ ?_
· exact prod_mono (nhdsSet_mono ht) le_rfl hs
· simp [sup_prod, *]
· rcases ((nhds_basis_opens _).prod l.basis_sets).mem_iff.1 (hs x hx)
with ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨⟨hx, huo⟩, hv⟩, hs⟩
refine ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (huo.mem_nhds hx), mem_of_superset ?_ hs⟩
exact prod_mem_prod (huo.mem_nhdsSet.2 Subset.rfl) hv
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) {Y} (l : Filter Y) :
(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l = ⨆ x ∈ K, 𝓝 x ×ˢ l :=
le_antisymm (fun s hs ↦ hK.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall <| by simpa using hs)
(iSup₂_le fun _ hx ↦ prod_mono (nhds_le_nhdsSet hx) le_rfl)
theorem IsCompact.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup {K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K) {X} (l : Filter X) :
l ×ˢ (𝓝ˢ K) = ⨆ y ∈ K, l ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by
simp only [prod_comm (f := l), hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup, map_iSup]
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `l ×ˢ 𝓝 y` for all `y` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `l ×ˢ (𝓝ˢ K)`,
i.e., there exist `t ∈ l` and an open `U ⊇ K` such that `t ×ˢ U ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_prod_nhdsSet_of_forall {K : Set Y} {X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ y ∈ K, s ∈ l ×ˢ 𝓝 y) : s ∈ l ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ K :=
(hK.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
-- TODO: Is there a way to prove directly the `inf` version and then deduce the `Prod` one ?
-- That would seem a bit more natural.
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
(𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l = ⨆ x ∈ K, 𝓝 x ⊓ l := by
have : ∀ f : Filter X, f ⊓ l = comap (fun x ↦ (x, x)) (f ×ˢ l) := fun f ↦ by
simpa only [comap_prod] using congrArg₂ (· ⊓ ·) comap_id.symm comap_id.symm
simp_rw [this, ← comap_iSup, hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup]
theorem IsCompact.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
l ⊓ (𝓝ˢ K) = ⨆ x ∈ K, l ⊓ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [inf_comm l, hK.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup]
/-- If `s : Set X` belongs to `𝓝 x ⊓ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `T ∈ l` such that `U ∩ T ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_inf_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l :=
(hK.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
/-- If `s : Set S` belongs to `l ⊓ 𝓝 x` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `l ⊓ (𝓝ˢ K)`,
i.e., there exist `T ∈ l` and an open `U ⊇ K` such that `T ∩ U ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_inf_nhdsSet_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ y ∈ K, s ∈ l ⊓ 𝓝 y) : s ∈ l ⊓ 𝓝ˢ K :=
(hK.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
/-- To show that `∀ y ∈ K, P x y` holds for `x` close enough to `x₀` when `K` is compact,
it is sufficient to show that for all `y₀ ∈ K` there `P x y` holds for `(x, y)` close enough
to `(x₀, y₀)`.
Provided for backwards compatibility,
see `IsCompact.mem_prod_nhdsSet_of_forall` for a stronger statement.
-/
theorem IsCompact.eventually_forall_of_forall_eventually {x₀ : X} {K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K)
{P : X → Y → Prop} (hP : ∀ y ∈ K, ∀ᶠ z : X × Y in 𝓝 (x₀, y), P z.1 z.2) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ y ∈ K, P x y := by
simp only [nhds_prod_eq, ← eventually_iSup, ← hK.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup] at hP
exact hP.curry.mono fun _ h ↦ h.self_of_nhdsSet
theorem isCompact_empty : IsCompact (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf hsf =>
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
theorem isCompact_singleton {x : X} : IsCompact ({x} : Set X) := fun _ hf hfa =>
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isCompact (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsCompact s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isCompact_empty fun _ => isCompact_singleton
theorem Set.Finite.isCompact_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsCompact (f i)) : IsCompact (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'.2 fun l hl => by
rw [Ultrafilter.finite_biUnion_mem_iff hs] at hl
rcases hl with ⟨i, his, hi⟩
rcases (hf i his).ultrafilter_le_nhds _ (le_principal_iff.2 hi) with ⟨x, hxi, hlx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, his, hxi⟩, hlx⟩
theorem Finset.isCompact_biUnion (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set X} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsCompact (f i)) :
IsCompact (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isCompact_biUnion hf
theorem isCompact_accumulate {K : ℕ → Set X} (hK : ∀ n, IsCompact (K n)) (n : ℕ) :
IsCompact (Accumulate K n) :=
(finite_le_nat n).isCompact_biUnion fun k _ => hK k
|
theorem Set.Finite.isCompact_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Finite) (hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsCompact s) :
IsCompact (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isCompact_biUnion hc
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Compact.lean | 455 | 459 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.SmoothSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.PoissonSummation
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.FiniteDimensional
/-!
# The two-variable Jacobi theta function
This file defines the two-variable Jacobi theta function
$$\theta(z, \tau) = \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} \exp (2 i \pi n z + i \pi n ^ 2 \tau),$$
and proves the functional equation relating the values at `(z, τ)` and `(z / τ, -1 / τ)`,
using Poisson's summation formula. We also show holomorphy (jointly in both variables).
Additionally, we show some analogous results about the derivative (in the `z`-variable)
$$\theta'(z, τ) = \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} 2 \pi i n \exp (2 i \pi n z + i \pi n ^ 2 \tau).$$
(Note that the Mellin transform of `θ` will give us functional equations for `L`-functions
of even Dirichlet characters, and that of `θ'` will do the same for odd Dirichlet characters.)
-/
open Complex Real Asymptotics Filter Topology
open scoped ComplexConjugate
noncomputable section
section term_defs
/-!
## Definitions of the summands
-/
/-- Summand in the series for the Jacobi theta function. -/
def jacobiTheta₂_term (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ := cexp (2 * π * I * n * z + π * I * n ^ 2 * τ)
/-- Summand in the series for the Fréchet derivative of the Jacobi theta function. -/
def jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ × ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ :=
cexp (2 * π * I * n * z + π * I * n ^ 2 * τ) •
((2 * π * I * n) • (ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ) +
(π * I * n ^ 2) • (ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ))
lemma hasFDerivAt_jacobiTheta₂_term (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) :
HasFDerivAt (fun p : ℂ × ℂ ↦ jacobiTheta₂_term n p.1 p.2)
(jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ) (z, τ) := by
let f : ℂ × ℂ → ℂ := fun p ↦ 2 * π * I * n * p.1 + π * I * n ^ 2 * p.2
suffices HasFDerivAt f ((2 * π * I * n) • (ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ)
+ (π * I * n ^ 2) • (ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ)) (z, τ) from this.cexp
exact (hasFDerivAt_fst.const_mul _).add (hasFDerivAt_snd.const_mul _)
/-- Summand in the series for the `z`-derivative of the Jacobi theta function. -/
def jacobiTheta₂'_term (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) := 2 * π * I * n * jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ
end term_defs
section term_bounds
/-!
## Bounds for the summands
We show that the sums of the three functions `jacobiTheta₂_term`, `jacobiTheta₂'_term` and
`jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv` are locally uniformly convergent in the domain `0 < im τ`, and diverge
everywhere else.
-/
lemma norm_jacobiTheta₂_term (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) :
‖jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ‖ = rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * τ.im - 2 * π * n * z.im) := by
rw [jacobiTheta₂_term, Complex.norm_exp, (by push_cast; ring :
(2 * π : ℂ) * I * n * z + π * I * n ^ 2 * τ = (π * (2 * n):) * z * I + (π * n ^ 2 :) * τ * I),
add_re, mul_I_re, im_ofReal_mul, mul_I_re, im_ofReal_mul]
ring_nf
/-- A uniform upper bound for `jacobiTheta₂_term` on compact subsets. -/
lemma norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_le {S T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) {z τ : ℂ}
(hz : |im z| ≤ S) (hτ : T ≤ im τ) (n : ℤ) :
‖jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ‖ ≤ rexp (-π * (T * n ^ 2 - 2 * S * |n|)) := by
simp_rw [norm_jacobiTheta₂_term, Real.exp_le_exp, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul, ← neg_add,
neg_le_neg_iff, mul_comm (2 : ℝ), mul_assoc π, ← mul_add, mul_le_mul_left pi_pos,
mul_comm T, mul_comm S]
refine add_le_add (mul_le_mul le_rfl hτ hT.le (sq_nonneg _)) ?_
rw [← mul_neg, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left two_pos, mul_comm, neg_mul, ← mul_neg]
refine le_trans ?_ (neg_abs_le _)
rw [mul_neg, neg_le_neg_iff, abs_mul, Int.cast_abs]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hz (abs_nonneg _)
/-- A uniform upper bound for `jacobiTheta₂'_term` on compact subsets. -/
lemma norm_jacobiTheta₂'_term_le {S T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) {z τ : ℂ}
(hz : |im z| ≤ S) (hτ : T ≤ im τ) (n : ℤ) :
‖jacobiTheta₂'_term n z τ‖ ≤ 2 * π * |n| * rexp (-π * (T * n ^ 2 - 2 * S * |n|)) := by
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, norm_mul]
refine mul_le_mul (le_of_eq ?_) (norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_le hT hz hτ n)
(norm_nonneg _) (by positivity)
simp only [norm_mul, Complex.norm_two, norm_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le,
norm_intCast, mul_one, Int.cast_abs]
/-- The uniform bound we have given is summable, and remains so after multiplying by any fixed
power of `|n|` (we shall need this for `k = 0, 1, 2`). -/
lemma summable_pow_mul_jacobiTheta₂_term_bound (S : ℝ) {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) (k : ℕ) :
Summable (fun n : ℤ ↦ (|n| ^ k : ℝ) * Real.exp (-π * (T * n ^ 2 - 2 * S * |n|))) := by
suffices Summable (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n ^ k : ℝ) * Real.exp (-π * (T * n ^ 2 - 2 * S * n))) by
apply Summable.of_nat_of_neg <;>
simpa only [Int.cast_neg, neg_sq, abs_neg, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.abs_cast]
apply summable_of_isBigO_nat (summable_pow_mul_exp_neg_nat_mul k zero_lt_one)
apply IsBigO.mul (isBigO_refl _ _)
refine Real.isBigO_exp_comp_exp_comp.mpr (Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_le_atBot ?_)
simp_rw [← tendsto_neg_atTop_iff, Pi.sub_apply]
conv =>
enter [1, n]
rw [show -(-π * (T * n ^ 2 - 2 * S * n) - -1 * n) = n * (π * T * n - (2 * π * S + 1)) by ring]
refine tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.atTop_mul_atTop₀ (tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ ?_)
exact tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.const_mul_atTop (mul_pos pi_pos hT)
/-- The series defining the theta function is summable if and only if `0 < im τ`. -/
lemma summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_iff (z τ : ℂ) : Summable (jacobiTheta₂_term · z τ) ↔ 0 < im τ := by
-- NB. This is a statement of no great mathematical interest; it is included largely to avoid
-- having to impose `0 < im τ` as a hypothesis on many later lemmas.
refine Iff.symm ⟨fun hτ ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩ -- do quicker implication first!
· refine (summable_pow_mul_jacobiTheta₂_term_bound |im z| hτ 0).of_norm_bounded _ ?_
simpa only [pow_zero, one_mul] using norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_le hτ le_rfl le_rfl
· by_contra! hτ
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hτ with hτ | hτ
· -- easy case `im τ < 0`
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖jacobiTheta₂_term ↑n z τ‖) atTop atTop by
replace h := (h.comp_injective (fun a b ↦ Int.ofNat_inj.mp)).tendsto_atTop_zero.norm
exact atTop_neBot.ne (disjoint_self.mp <| h.disjoint (disjoint_nhds_atTop _) this)
simp only [norm_zero, Function.comp_def, norm_jacobiTheta₂_term, Int.cast_natCast]
conv =>
enter [1, n]
rw [show -π * n ^ 2 * τ.im - 2 * π * n * z.im =
n * (n * (-π * τ.im) - 2 * π * z.im) by ring]
refine tendsto_exp_atTop.comp (tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.atTop_mul_atTop₀ ?_)
exact tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ (tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.atTop_mul_const
(mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg (neg_lt_zero.mpr pi_pos) hτ))
· -- case im τ = 0: 3-way split according to `im z`
simp_rw [← summable_norm_iff (E := ℂ), norm_jacobiTheta₂_term, hτ, mul_zero, zero_sub] at h
rcases lt_trichotomy (im z) 0 with hz | hz | hz
· replace h := (h.comp_injective (fun a b ↦ Int.ofNat_inj.mp)).tendsto_atTop_zero
simp_rw [Function.comp_def, Int.cast_natCast] at h
refine atTop_neBot.ne (disjoint_self.mp <| h.disjoint (disjoint_nhds_atTop 0) ?_)
refine tendsto_exp_atTop.comp ?_
simp only [tendsto_neg_atTop_iff, mul_assoc]
apply Filter.Tendsto.const_mul_atBot two_pos
exact (tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.atTop_mul_const_of_neg hz).const_mul_atBot pi_pos
· revert h
simpa only [hz, mul_zero, neg_zero, Real.exp_zero, summable_const_iff] using one_ne_zero
· have : ((-↑·) : ℕ → ℤ).Injective := fun _ _ ↦ by simp only [neg_inj, Nat.cast_inj, imp_self]
replace h := (h.comp_injective this).tendsto_atTop_zero
simp_rw [Function.comp_def, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast, mul_neg, neg_mul, neg_neg] at h
refine atTop_neBot.ne (disjoint_self.mp <| h.disjoint (disjoint_nhds_atTop 0) ?_)
exact tendsto_exp_atTop.comp ((tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.const_mul_atTop
(mul_pos two_pos pi_pos)).atTop_mul_const hz)
lemma norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_le (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) :
‖jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ‖ ≤ 3 * π * |n| ^ 2 * ‖jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ‖ := by
-- this is slow to elaborate so do it once and reuse:
have hns (a : ℂ) (f : (ℂ × ℂ) →L[ℂ] ℂ) : ‖a • f‖ = ‖a‖ * ‖f‖ := norm_smul a f
rw [jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv, jacobiTheta₂_term, hns,
mul_comm _ ‖cexp _‖, (by norm_num : (3 : ℝ) = 2 + 1), add_mul, add_mul]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ((norm_add_le _ _).trans (add_le_add ?_ ?_)) (norm_nonneg _)
· simp_rw [hns, norm_mul, ← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_intCast,
norm_real, norm_of_nonneg zero_le_two, Real.norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le, norm_I, mul_one,
Real.norm_eq_abs, Int.cast_abs, mul_assoc]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ pi_pos.le) two_pos.le
refine le_trans ?_ (?_ : |(n : ℝ)| ≤ |(n : ℝ)| ^ 2)
· exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (abs_nonneg _) (ContinuousLinearMap.norm_fst_le ..)
· exact_mod_cast Int.le_self_sq |n|
· simp_rw [hns, norm_mul, one_mul, norm_I, mul_one,
norm_real, norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le, ← ofReal_intCast, ← ofReal_pow, norm_real,
Real.norm_eq_abs, Int.cast_abs, abs_pow]
apply mul_le_of_le_one_right (mul_nonneg pi_pos.le (pow_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) _))
exact ContinuousLinearMap.norm_snd_le ..
lemma norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_ge (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) :
π * |n| ^ 2 * ‖jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ‖ ≤ ‖jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ‖ := by
have : ‖(jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ) (0, 1)‖ ≤ ‖jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ‖ := by
refine (ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Prod.norm_def, norm_one, norm_zero, max_eq_right zero_le_one, mul_one, le_refl]
refine le_trans ?_ this
simp_rw [jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv, jacobiTheta₂_term, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul',
Pi.smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul',
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_fst', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_snd', Pi.smul_apply, smul_zero, zero_add,
smul_eq_mul, mul_one, mul_comm _ ‖cexp _‖, norm_mul]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_of_eq ?_) (norm_nonneg _)
simp_rw [norm_real, norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le, norm_I, mul_one,
Int.cast_abs, ← norm_intCast, norm_pow]
lemma summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_iff (z τ : ℂ) :
Summable (jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv · z τ) ↔ 0 < im τ := by
constructor
· rw [← summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_iff (z := z)]
intro h
have := h.norm
refine this.of_norm_bounded_eventually _ ?_
have : ∀ᶠ (n : ℤ) in cofinite, n ≠ 0 :=
Int.cofinite_eq ▸ (mem_sup.mpr ⟨eventually_ne_atBot 0, eventually_ne_atTop 0⟩)
filter_upwards [this] with n hn
refine le_trans ?_ (norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_ge n z τ)
apply le_mul_of_one_le_left (norm_nonneg _)
refine one_le_pi_div_two.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ pi_pos.le)
refine (by norm_num : 2⁻¹ ≤ (1 : ℝ)).trans ?_
rw [one_le_sq_iff_one_le_abs, ← Int.cast_abs, abs_abs, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_le]
exact Int.one_le_abs hn
· intro hτ
refine ((summable_pow_mul_jacobiTheta₂_term_bound
|z.im| hτ 2).mul_left (3 * π)).of_norm_bounded _ (fun n ↦ ?_)
refine (norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_le n z τ).trans
(?_ : 3 * π * |n| ^ 2 * ‖jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ‖ ≤ _)
simp_rw [mul_assoc (3 * π)]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (mul_pos (by norm_num : 0 < (3 : ℝ)) pi_pos).le
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (pow_nonneg (Int.cast_nonneg.mpr (abs_nonneg _)) _)
exact norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_le hτ le_rfl le_rfl n
lemma summable_jacobiTheta₂'_term_iff (z τ : ℂ) :
Summable (jacobiTheta₂'_term · z τ) ↔ 0 < im τ := by
constructor
· rw [← summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_iff (z := z)]
refine fun h ↦ (h.norm.mul_left (2 * π)⁻¹).of_norm_bounded_eventually _ ?_
have : ∀ᶠ (n : ℤ) in cofinite, n ≠ 0 :=
Int.cofinite_eq ▸ (mem_sup.mpr ⟨eventually_ne_atBot 0, eventually_ne_atTop 0⟩)
filter_upwards [this] with n hn
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, norm_mul, ← mul_assoc]
refine le_mul_of_one_le_left (norm_nonneg _) ?_
simp_rw [norm_mul, norm_I, norm_real, mul_one, norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le,
← ofReal_ofNat, norm_real, norm_of_nonneg two_pos.le, ← ofReal_intCast, norm_real,
Real.norm_eq_abs, ← Int.cast_abs, ← mul_assoc _ (2 * π),
inv_mul_cancel₀ (mul_pos two_pos pi_pos).ne', one_mul]
rw [← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_le]
exact Int.one_le_abs hn
· refine fun hτ ↦ ((summable_pow_mul_jacobiTheta₂_term_bound
|z.im| hτ 1).mul_left (2 * π)).of_norm_bounded _ (fun n ↦ ?_)
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, norm_mul, ← mul_assoc, pow_one]
refine mul_le_mul (le_of_eq ?_) (norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_le hτ le_rfl le_rfl n)
(norm_nonneg _) (by positivity)
simp_rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_two, norm_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le,
norm_intCast, mul_one, Int.cast_abs]
end term_bounds
/-!
## Definitions of the functions
-/
/-- The two-variable Jacobi theta function,
`θ z τ = ∑' (n : ℤ), cexp (2 * π * I * n * z + π * I * n ^ 2 * τ)`.
-/
def jacobiTheta₂ (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ := ∑' n : ℤ, jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ
/-- Fréchet derivative of the two-variable Jacobi theta function. -/
def jacobiTheta₂_fderiv (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ × ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ := ∑' n : ℤ, jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ
/-- The `z`-derivative of the Jacobi theta function,
`θ' z τ = ∑' (n : ℤ), 2 * π * I * n * cexp (2 * π * I * n * z + π * I * n ^ 2 * τ)`.
-/
def jacobiTheta₂' (z τ : ℂ) := ∑' n : ℤ, jacobiTheta₂'_term n z τ
lemma hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term (z : ℂ) {τ : ℂ} (hτ : 0 < im τ) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ) (jacobiTheta₂ z τ) :=
((summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_iff z τ).mpr hτ).hasSum
lemma hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv (z : ℂ) {τ : ℂ} (hτ : 0 < im τ) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ) (jacobiTheta₂_fderiv z τ) :=
((summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_iff z τ).mpr hτ).hasSum
lemma hasSum_jacobiTheta₂'_term (z : ℂ) {τ : ℂ} (hτ : 0 < im τ) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ jacobiTheta₂'_term n z τ) (jacobiTheta₂' z τ) :=
((summable_jacobiTheta₂'_term_iff z τ).mpr hτ).hasSum
lemma jacobiTheta₂_undef (z : ℂ) {τ : ℂ} (hτ : im τ ≤ 0) : jacobiTheta₂ z τ = 0 := by
apply tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable
rw [summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_iff]
exact not_lt.mpr hτ
lemma jacobiTheta₂_fderiv_undef (z : ℂ) {τ : ℂ} (hτ : im τ ≤ 0) : jacobiTheta₂_fderiv z τ = 0 := by
apply tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable
rw [summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_iff]
exact not_lt.mpr hτ
|
lemma jacobiTheta₂'_undef (z : ℂ) {τ : ℂ} (hτ : im τ ≤ 0) : jacobiTheta₂' z τ = 0 := by
apply tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable
rw [summable_jacobiTheta₂'_term_iff]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/JacobiTheta/TwoVariable.lean | 282 | 285 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
(fun i => by positivity)
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a _ _ hab hac _ =>
le_ciInf fun _ => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- We define the supremum of an arbitrary subset of `Seminorm 𝕜 E` as follows:
* if `s` is `BddAbove` *as a set of functions `E → ℝ`* (that is, if `s` is pointwise bounded
above), we take the pointwise supremum of all elements of `s`, and we prove that it is indeed a
seminorm.
* otherwise, we take the zero seminorm `⊥`.
There are two things worth mentioning here:
* First, it is not trivial at first that `s` being bounded above *by a function* implies
being bounded above *as a seminorm*. We show this in `Seminorm.bddAbove_iff` by using
that the `Sup s` as defined here is then a bounding seminorm for `s`. So it is important to make
the case disjunction on `BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))` and not `BddAbove s`.
* Since the pointwise `Sup` already gives `0` at points where a family of functions is
not bounded above, one could hope that just using the pointwise `Sup` would work here, without the
need for an additional case disjunction. As discussed on Zulip, this doesn't work because this can
give a function which does *not* satisfy the seminorm axioms (typically sub-additivity).
-/
noncomputable instance instSupSet : SupSet (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sSup s :=
if h : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) then
{ toFun := ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ)
map_zero' := by
rw [iSup_apply, ← @Real.iSup_const_zero s]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact map_zero i.1
add_le' := fun x y => by
rcases h with ⟨q, hq⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
haveI : Nonempty ↑s := h.coe_sort
simp only [iSup_apply]
refine ciSup_le fun i =>
((i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).add_le' x y).trans <| add_le_add
-- Porting note: `f` is provided to force `Subtype.val` to appear.
-- A type ascription on `_` would have also worked, but would have been more verbose.
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun x) ⟨q x, ?_⟩ i)
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun y) ⟨q y, ?_⟩ i)
<;> rw [mem_upperBounds, forall_mem_range]
<;> exact fun j => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ j.2) _
neg' := fun x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
congr! 2
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.neg' _
smul' := fun a x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul,
Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a) fun i : s => (i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.smul' a x }
else ⊥
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq' {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hs : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))) : ↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_pos hs)
protected theorem bddAbove_iff {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove s ↔ BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨q, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hp => hq hp⟩, fun H =>
⟨sSup s, fun p hp x => by
dsimp
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' H, iSup_apply]
rcases H with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact
le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ i.2) x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩⟩⟩
protected theorem bddAbove_range_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove (range p) ↔ ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i ↦ p i x) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_iff, ← range_comp, bddAbove_range_pi]; rfl
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' (Seminorm.bddAbove_iff.mp hs)
protected theorem coe_iSup_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) :
↑(⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, ((p i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) := by
rw [← sSup_range, Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp]
exact iSup_range' (fun p : Seminorm 𝕜 E => (p : E → ℝ)) p
protected theorem sSup_apply {s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)} (hp : BddAbove s) {x : E} :
(sSup s) x = ⨆ p : s, (p : E → ℝ) x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem iSup_apply {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hp : BddAbove (range p)) {x : E} : (⨆ i, p i) x = ⨆ i, p i x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) = ⊥ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.sSup_apply bddAbove_empty, Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
rfl
private theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (hs₂ : s.Nonempty) :
IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
refine ⟨fun p hp x => ?_, fun p hp x => ?_⟩ <;> haveI : Nonempty ↑s := hs₂.coe_sort <;>
dsimp <;> rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hs₁, iSup_apply]
· rcases hs₁ with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq i.2 x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩
· exact ciSup_le fun q => hp q.2 x
/-- `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a conditionally complete lattice.
Note that, while `inf`, `sup` and `sSup` have good definitional properties (corresponding to
the instances given here for `Inf`, `Sup` and `SupSet` respectively), `sInf s` is just
defined as the supremum of the lower bounds of `s`, which is not really useful in practice. If you
need to use `sInf` on seminorms, then you should probably provide a more workable definition first,
but this is unlikely to happen so we keep the "bad" definition for now. -/
noncomputable instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
conditionallyCompleteLatticeOfLatticeOfsSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) Seminorm.isLUB_sSup
end Classical
end NormedField
/-! ### Seminorm ball -/
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- The ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y` with
`p (y - x) < r`. -/
def ball (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) < r }
/-- The closed ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y`
with `p (y - x) ≤ r`. -/
def closedBall (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) ≤ r }
variable {x y : E} {r : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball p x r ↔ p (y - x) < r :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall p x r ↔ p (y - x) ≤ r :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball_self (hr : 0 < r) : x ∈ ball p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_closedBall_self (hr : 0 ≤ r) : x ∈ closedBall p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_ball_zero : y ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ p y < r := by rw [mem_ball, sub_zero]
theorem mem_closedBall_zero : y ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ p y ≤ r := by rw [mem_closedBall, sub_zero]
theorem ball_zero_eq : ball p 0 r = { y : E | p y < r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_ball_zero
theorem closedBall_zero_eq : closedBall p 0 r = { y : E | p y ≤ r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_closedBall_zero
theorem ball_subset_closedBall (x r) : ball p x r ⊆ closedBall p x r := fun _ h =>
(mem_closedBall _).mpr ((mem_ball _).mp h).le
theorem closedBall_eq_biInter_ball (x r) : closedBall p x r = ⋂ ρ > r, ball p x ρ := by
ext y; simp_rw [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball, ← forall_lt_iff_le']
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ := by
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall, ball]
simp [hr]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
eq_univ_of_subset (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _) (ball_zero' x hr)
theorem ball_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).ball x r = p.ball x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_ball, mem_ball, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
lt_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem closedBall_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).closedBall x r = p.closedBall x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
le_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem ball_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (p ⊔ q) e r = ball p e r ∩ ball q e r := by
simp_rw [ball, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_lt_iff]
theorem closedBall_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall (p ⊔ q) e r = closedBall p e r ∩ closedBall q e r := by
simp_rw [closedBall, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_le_iff]
theorem ball_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => ball (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, ball_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E)
(r : ℝ) : closedBall (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => closedBall (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, closedBall_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem ball_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) : p.ball x r₁ ⊆ p.ball x r₂ :=
fun _ (hx : _ < _) => hx.trans_le h
theorem closedBall_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
p.closedBall x r₁ ⊆ p.closedBall x r₂ := fun _ (hx : _ ≤ _) => hx.trans h
theorem ball_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) : p.ball x r ⊆ q.ball x r := fun _ =>
(h _).trans_lt
theorem closedBall_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) :
p.closedBall x r ⊆ q.closedBall x r := fun _ => (h _).trans
theorem ball_add_ball_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.ball (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.ball (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.ball (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_ball, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem closedBall_add_closedBall_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.closedBall (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.closedBall (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_closedBall, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans (add_le_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem sub_mem_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.ball y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.ball (x₂ + y) r := by simp_rw [mem_ball, sub_sub]
theorem sub_mem_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.closedBall y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.closedBall (x₂ + y) r := by
simp_rw [mem_closedBall, sub_sub]
/-- The image of a ball under addition with a singleton is another ball. -/
theorem vadd_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.ball y r = p.ball (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_ball x y r
/-- The image of a closed ball under addition with a singleton is another closed ball. -/
theorem vadd_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_closedBall x y r
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
theorem ball_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).ball x r = f ⁻¹' p.ball (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [ball, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
theorem closedBall_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).closedBall x r = f ⁻¹' p.closedBall (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [closedBall, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
theorem preimage_metric_ball {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r = { x | p x < r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_ball_zero_iff, Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem preimage_metric_closedBall {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r = { x | p x ≤ r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_closedBall_zero_iff,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball {r : ℝ} : p.ball 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r := by
rw [ball_zero_eq, preimage_metric_ball]
theorem closedBall_zero_eq_preimage_closedBall {r : ℝ} :
p.closedBall 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r := by
rw [closedBall_zero_eq, preimage_metric_closedBall]
@[simp]
theorem ball_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
ball_zero' x hr
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) :
closedBall (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
closedBall_zero' x hr
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_ball_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (ball p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_ball_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ < r := by rwa [mem_ball_zero] at hy
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_closedBall_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (closedBall p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_closedBall_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
theorem ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 < r) : ball (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, ball (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr.le
simp_rw [ball, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe,
Finset.sup_lt_iff (show ⊥ < r from hr), ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 ≤ r) : closedBall (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, closedBall (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr
simp_rw [closedBall, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe, Finset.sup_le_iff, ←
NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ball_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
ball (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => ball (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
theorem closedBall_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
closedBall (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => closedBall (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) : p.ball x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_ball, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_lt]
exact hr.trans (apply_nonneg p _)
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
p.closedBall x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_le]
exact hr.trans_le (apply_nonneg _ _)
theorem closedBall_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ : ℝ} (hr₁ : r₁ ≠ 0) (r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
refine fun a ha b hb ↦ mul_lt_mul' ha hb (apply_nonneg _ _) ?_
exact hr₁.lt_or_lt.resolve_left <| ((norm_nonneg a).trans ha).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ : ℝ) {r₂ : ℝ} (hr₂ : r₂ ≠ 0) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_ball_zero_iff,
map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r₁]
refine mul_lt_mul' hb ha (norm_nonneg _) (hr₂.lt_or_lt.resolve_left ?_)
exact ((apply_nonneg p b).trans hb).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
rcases eq_or_ne r₂ 0 with rfl | hr₂
· simp
· exact (smul_subset_smul_left (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _)).trans
(ball_smul_closedBall _ _ hr₂)
theorem closedBall_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
gcongr
exact (norm_nonneg _).trans ha
theorem neg_mem_ball_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ x ∈ ball p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_ball_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
theorem neg_mem_closedBall_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ x ∈ closedBall p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_closedBall_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) : -ball p x r = ball p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_ball, mem_ball, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
-closedBall p x r = closedBall p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
end Module
end AddCommGroup
end SeminormedRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r : ℝ} {x : E}
theorem closedBall_iSup {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) (e : E)
{r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (⨆ i, p i) e r = ⋂ i, closedBall (p i) e r := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iSup_of_empty', iInter_of_empty, Seminorm.sSup_empty]
exact closedBall_bot _ hr
· ext x
have := Seminorm.bddAbove_range_iff.mp hp (x - e)
simp only [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter, Seminorm.iSup_apply hp, ciSup_le_iff this]
theorem ball_norm_mul_subset {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} :
p.ball 0 (‖k‖ * r) ⊆ k • p.ball 0 r := by
rcases eq_or_ne k 0 with (rfl | hk)
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, ball_eq_emptyset _ le_rfl]
exact empty_subset _
· intro x
rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Seminorm.mem_ball_zero]
refine fun hx => ⟨k⁻¹ • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Seminorm.mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul, norm_inv, ←
mul_lt_mul_left <| norm_pos_iff.mpr hk, ← mul_assoc, ← div_eq_mul_inv ‖k‖ ‖k‖,
div_self (ne_of_gt <| norm_pos_iff.mpr hk), one_mul]
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self hk, one_smul]
theorem smul_ball_zero {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} (hk : k ≠ 0) :
k • p.ball 0 r = p.ball 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
ext
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hk, p.mem_ball_zero, p.mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul,
norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.2 hk), mul_comm]
theorem smul_closedBall_subset {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} :
k • p.closedBall 0 r ⊆ p.closedBall 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hy, h⟩
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero, ← h, map_smul_eq_mul]
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
gcongr
theorem smul_closedBall_zero {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} (hk : 0 < ‖k‖) :
k • p.closedBall 0 r = p.closedBall 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
refine subset_antisymm smul_closedBall_subset ?_
intro x
rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero]
refine fun hx => ⟨k⁻¹ • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero, map_smul_eq_mul, norm_inv, ← mul_le_mul_left hk, ← mul_assoc,
← div_eq_mul_inv ‖k‖ ‖k‖, div_self (ne_of_gt hk), one_mul]
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self (norm_pos_iff.mp hk), one_smul]
theorem ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 < r₁) :
Absorbs 𝕜 (p.ball 0 r₁) (p.ball 0 r₂) := by
rcases exists_pos_lt_mul hr₁ r₂ with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
refine .of_norm ⟨r, fun a ha x hx => ?_⟩
rw [smul_ball_zero (norm_pos_iff.1 <| hr₀.trans_le ha), p.mem_ball_zero]
rw [p.mem_ball_zero] at hx
exact hx.trans (hr.trans_le <| by gcongr)
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_ball_zero (hr : 0 < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (ball p (0 : E) r) :=
absorbent_iff_forall_absorbs_singleton.2 fun _ =>
(p.ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero hr).mono_right <|
singleton_subset_iff.2 <| p.mem_ball_zero.2 <| lt_add_one _
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_closedBall_zero (hr : 0 < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (closedBall p (0 : E) r) :=
(p.absorbent_ball_zero hr).mono (p.ball_subset_closedBall _ _)
/-- Seminorm-balls containing the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_ball (hpr : p x < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (ball p x r) := by
refine (p.absorbent_ball_zero <| sub_pos.2 hpr).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [p.mem_ball_zero] at hy
exact p.mem_ball.2 ((map_sub_le_add p _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_of_lt_sub_right hy)
/-- Seminorm-balls containing the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_closedBall (hpr : p x < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (closedBall p x r) := by
refine (p.absorbent_closedBall_zero <| sub_pos.2 hpr).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [p.mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
exact p.mem_closedBall.2 ((map_sub_le_add p _ _).trans <| add_le_of_le_sub_right hy)
@[simp]
theorem smul_ball_preimage (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (y : E) (r : ℝ) (a : 𝕜) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • ·) ⁻¹' p.ball y r = p.ball (a⁻¹ • y) (r / ‖a‖) :=
Set.ext fun _ => by
rw [mem_preimage, mem_ball, mem_ball, lt_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr ha), mul_comm, ←
map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul₀ ha]
@[simp]
theorem smul_closedBall_preimage (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (y : E) (r : ℝ) (a : 𝕜) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • ·) ⁻¹' p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (a⁻¹ • y) (r / ‖a‖) :=
Set.ext fun _ => by
rw [mem_preimage, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr ha), mul_comm, ←
map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul₀ ha]
end NormedField
section Convex
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E]
section SMul
variable [SMul ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- A seminorm is convex. Also see `convexOn_norm`. -/
protected theorem convexOn : ConvexOn ℝ univ p := by
refine ⟨convex_univ, fun x _ y _ a b ha hb _ => ?_⟩
calc
p (a • x + b • y) ≤ p (a • x) + p (b • y) := map_add_le_add p _ _
_ = ‖a • (1 : 𝕜)‖ * p x + ‖b • (1 : 𝕜)‖ * p y := by
rw [← map_smul_eq_mul p, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_one_smul, smul_one_smul]
_ = a * p x + b * p y := by
rw [norm_smul, norm_smul, norm_one, mul_one, mul_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg ha,
Real.norm_of_nonneg hb]
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Seminorm-balls are convex. -/
theorem convex_ball : Convex ℝ (ball p x r) := by
convert (p.convexOn.translate_left (-x)).convex_lt r
ext y
rw [preimage_univ, sep_univ, p.mem_ball, sub_eq_add_neg]
rfl
/-- Closed seminorm-balls are convex. -/
theorem convex_closedBall : Convex ℝ (closedBall p x r) := by
rw [closedBall_eq_biInter_ball]
exact convex_iInter₂ fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _ _
end Module
end Convex
section RestrictScalars
variable (𝕜) {𝕜' : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [SeminormedRing 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜']
[NormOneClass 𝕜'] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜' E] [SMul 𝕜 E] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' E]
/-- Reinterpret a seminorm over a field `𝕜'` as a seminorm over a smaller field `𝕜`. This will
typically be used with `RCLike 𝕜'` and `𝕜 = ℝ`. -/
protected def restrictScalars (p : Seminorm 𝕜' E) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p with
smul' := fun a x => by rw [← smul_one_smul 𝕜' a x, p.smul', norm_smul, norm_one, mul_one] }
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (p : Seminorm 𝕜' E) : (p.restrictScalars 𝕜 : E → ℝ) = p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜' E) : (p.restrictScalars 𝕜).ball = p.ball :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜' E) :
(p.restrictScalars 𝕜).closedBall = p.closedBall :=
rfl
end RestrictScalars
/-! ### Continuity criterions for seminorms -/
section Continuity
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [SeminormedRing 𝕝] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [Module 𝕝 E]
| /-- A seminorm is continuous at `0` if `p.closedBall 0 r ∈ 𝓝 0` for *all* `r > 0`.
Over a `NontriviallyNormedField` it is actually enough to check that this is true
for *some* `r`, see `Seminorm.continuousAt_zero'`. -/
theorem continuousAt_zero_of_forall' [TopologicalSpace E] {p : Seminorm 𝕝 E}
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 1,047 | 1,050 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
import Mathlib.Tactic.Basic
import Batteries.Logic
import Batteries.Tactic.Trans
import Batteries.Util.LibraryNote
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Notation
/-!
# Basic logic properties
This file is one of the earliest imports in mathlib.
## Implementation notes
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace `Decidable`.
Classical versions are in the namespace `Classical`.
-/
open Function
section Miscellany
-- attribute [refl] HEq.refl -- FIXME This is still rejected after https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/857
attribute [trans] Iff.trans HEq.trans heq_of_eq_of_heq
attribute [simp] cast_heq
/-- An identity function with its main argument implicit. This will be printed as `hidden` even
if it is applied to a large term, so it can be used for elision,
as done in the `elide` and `unelide` tactics. -/
abbrev hidden {α : Sort*} {a : α} := a
variable {α : Sort*}
instance (priority := 10) decidableEq_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : DecidableEq α :=
fun a b ↦ isTrue (Subsingleton.elim a b)
instance [Subsingleton α] (p : α → Prop) : Subsingleton (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ ↦ by cases Subsingleton.elim x y; rfl⟩
theorem congr_heq {α β γ : Sort _} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} {x : α} {y : β}
(h₁ : HEq f g) (h₂ : HEq x y) : f x = g y := by
cases h₂; cases h₁; rfl
theorem congr_arg_heq {β : α → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, β a) :
∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ = a₂ → HEq (f a₁) (f a₂)
| _, _, rfl => HEq.rfl
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_left {b c : α} : (∀ {a}, a = b ↔ a = c) ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_right {a b : α} : (∀ {c}, a = c ↔ b = c) ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
lemma ne_and_eq_iff_right {a b c : α} (h : b ≠ c) : a ≠ b ∧ a = c ↔ a = c :=
and_iff_right_of_imp (fun h2 => h2.symm ▸ h.symm)
/-- Wrapper for adding elementary propositions to the type class systems.
Warning: this can easily be abused. See the rest of this docstring for details.
Certain propositions should not be treated as a class globally,
but sometimes it is very convenient to be able to use the type class system
in specific circumstances.
For example, `ZMod p` is a field if and only if `p` is a prime number.
In order to be able to find this field instance automatically by type class search,
we have to turn `p.prime` into an instance implicit assumption.
On the other hand, making `Nat.prime` a class would require a major refactoring of the library,
and it is questionable whether making `Nat.prime` a class is desirable at all.
The compromise is to add the assumption `[Fact p.prime]` to `ZMod.field`.
In particular, this class is not intended for turning the type class system
into an automated theorem prover for first order logic. -/
class Fact (p : Prop) : Prop where
/-- `Fact.out` contains the unwrapped witness for the fact represented by the instance of
`Fact p`. -/
out : p
library_note "fact non-instances"/--
In most cases, we should not have global instances of `Fact`; typeclass search only reads the head
symbol and then tries any instances, which means that adding any such instance will cause slowdowns
everywhere. We instead make them as lemmata and make them local instances as required.
-/
theorem Fact.elim {p : Prop} (h : Fact p) : p := h.1
theorem fact_iff {p : Prop} : Fact p ↔ p := ⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
instance {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : Decidable (Fact p) :=
decidable_of_iff _ fact_iff.symm
/-- Swaps two pairs of arguments to a function. -/
abbrev Function.swap₂ {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
{φ : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Sort*} (f : ∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂)
(i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) : φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂
end Miscellany
open Function
/-!
### Declarations about propositional connectives
-/
section Propositional
/-! ### Declarations about `implies` -/
alias Iff.imp := imp_congr
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.imp_iff_right_iff`. Deprecate?
theorem imp_iff_right_iff {a b : Prop} : (a → b ↔ b) ↔ a ∨ b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.and_or_imp`. Deprecate?
theorem and_or_imp {a b c : Prop} : a ∧ b ∨ (a → c) ↔ a → b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_or_imp
/-- Provide modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mt {a b : Prop} : (a → b) → ¬b → ¬a := mt
/-! ### Declarations about `not` -/
alias dec_em := Decidable.em
theorem dec_em' (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := (dec_em p).symm
alias em := Classical.em
theorem em' (p : Prop) : ¬p ∨ p := (em p).symm
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬p := em _
theorem Decidable.eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x = y ∨ x ≠ y :=
dec_em <| x = y
theorem Decidable.ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x ≠ y ∨ x = y :=
dec_em' <| x = y
theorem eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := em <| x = y
theorem ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := em' <| x = y
theorem by_contradiction {p : Prop} : (¬p → False) → p :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.byContradiction
theorem by_cases {p q : Prop} (hpq : p → q) (hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
open scoped Classical in if hp : p then hpq hp else hnpq hp
alias by_contra := by_contradiction
library_note "decidable namespace"/--
In most of mathlib, we use the law of excluded middle (LEM) and the axiom of choice (AC) freely.
The `Decidable` namespace contains versions of lemmas from the root namespace that explicitly
attempt to avoid the axiom of choice, usually by adding decidability assumptions on the inputs.
You can check if a lemma uses the axiom of choice by using `#print axioms foo` and seeing if
`Classical.choice` appears in the list.
-/
library_note "decidable arguments"/--
As mathlib is primarily classical,
if the type signature of a `def` or `lemma` does not require any `Decidable` instances to state,
it is preferable not to introduce any `Decidable` instances that are needed in the proof
as arguments, but rather to use the `classical` tactic as needed.
In the other direction, when `Decidable` instances do appear in the type signature,
it is better to use explicitly introduced ones rather than allowing Lean to automatically infer
classical ones, as these may cause instance mismatch errors later.
-/
export Classical (not_not)
attribute [simp] not_not
variable {a b : Prop}
theorem of_not_not {a : Prop} : ¬¬a → a := by_contra
theorem not_ne_iff {α : Sort*} {a b : α} : ¬a ≠ b ↔ a = b := not_not
theorem of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.of_not_imp
alias Not.decidable_imp_symm := Decidable.not_imp_symm
theorem Not.imp_symm : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Not.decidable_imp_symm
theorem not_imp_comm : ¬a → b ↔ ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem not_imp_self : ¬a → a ↔ a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_self
theorem Imp.swap {a b : Sort*} {c : Prop} : a → b → c ↔ b → a → c :=
⟨fun h x y ↦ h y x, fun h x y ↦ h y x⟩
alias Iff.not := not_congr
theorem Iff.not_left (h : a ↔ ¬b) : ¬a ↔ b := h.not.trans not_not
theorem Iff.not_right (h : ¬a ↔ b) : a ↔ ¬b := not_not.symm.trans h.not
protected lemma Iff.ne {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c = d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not
lemma Iff.ne_left {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) :=
Iff.not_left
lemma Iff.ne_right {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) → (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not_right
/-! ### Declarations about `Xor'` -/
/-- `Xor' a b` is the exclusive-or of propositions. -/
def Xor' (a b : Prop) := (a ∧ ¬b) ∨ (b ∧ ¬a)
instance [Decidable a] [Decidable b] : Decidable (Xor' a b) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (Or ..))
@[simp] theorem xor_true : Xor' True = Not := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_false : Xor' False = id := by ext; simp [Xor']
theorem xor_comm (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b = Xor' b a := by simp [Xor', and_comm, or_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative Xor' := ⟨xor_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem xor_self (a : Prop) : Xor' a a = False := by simp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_not_left : Xor' (¬a) b ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem xor_not_right : Xor' a (¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
theorem xor_not_not : Xor' (¬a) (¬b) ↔ Xor' a b := by simp [Xor', or_comm, and_comm]
protected theorem Xor'.or (h : Xor' a b) : a ∨ b := h.imp And.left And.left
/-! ### Declarations about `and` -/
alias Iff.and := and_congr
alias ⟨And.rotate, _⟩ := and_rotate
theorem and_symm_right {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : p ∧ a = b ↔ p ∧ b = a := by simp [eq_comm]
theorem and_symm_left {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : a = b ∧ p ↔ b = a ∧ p := by simp [eq_comm]
/-! ### Declarations about `or` -/
alias Iff.or := or_congr
alias ⟨Or.rotate, _⟩ := or_rotate
theorem Or.elim3 {c d : Prop} (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
Or.elim h ha fun h₂ ↦ Or.elim h₂ hb hc
theorem Or.imp3 {d e c f : Prop} (had : a → d) (hbe : b → e) (hcf : c → f) :
a ∨ b ∨ c → d ∨ e ∨ f :=
Or.imp had <| Or.imp hbe hcf
export Classical (or_iff_not_imp_left or_iff_not_imp_right)
theorem not_or_of_imp : (a → b) → ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_or_of_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.or_not_of_imp [Decidable a] (h : a → b) : b ∨ ¬a :=
dite _ (Or.inl ∘ h) Or.inr
theorem or_not_of_imp : (a → b) → b ∨ ¬a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_not_of_imp
theorem imp_iff_not_or : a → b ↔ ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_not_or
theorem imp_iff_or_not {b a : Prop} : b → a ↔ a ∨ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_or_not
theorem not_imp_not : ¬a → ¬b ↔ b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_not
theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p → q) ∧ (¬p → q) ↔ q := by simp
/-- Provide the reverse of modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mtr : (¬a → ¬b) → b → a := not_imp_not.mp
theorem or_congr_left' {c a b : Prop} (h : ¬c → (a ↔ b)) : a ∨ c ↔ b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_left' h
theorem or_congr_right' {c : Prop} (h : ¬a → (b ↔ c)) : a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_right' h
/-! ### Declarations about distributivity -/
/-! Declarations about `iff` -/
alias Iff.iff := iff_congr
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem iff_mpr_iff_true_intro {P : Prop} (h : P) : Iff.mpr (iff_true_intro h) True.intro = h := rfl
theorem imp_or {a b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or
theorem imp_or' {a : Sort*} {b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or'
theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.peirce _ _
theorem not_iff_not : (¬a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_not
theorem not_iff_comm : (¬a ↔ b) ↔ (¬b ↔ a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_comm
theorem not_iff : ¬(a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff
theorem iff_not_comm : (a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_not_comm
theorem iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ a ∧ b ∨ ¬a ∧ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not
theorem iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not
theorem not_and_not_right : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ a → b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_not_right
/-! ### De Morgan's laws -/
/-- One of **de Morgan's laws**: the negation of a conjunction is logically equivalent to the
disjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_and_or : ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_iff_not_or_not
theorem or_iff_not_and_not : a ∨ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_iff_not_not_and_not
theorem and_iff_not_or_not : a ∧ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_iff_not_not_or_not
@[simp] theorem not_xor (P Q : Prop) : ¬Xor' P Q ↔ (P ↔ Q) := by
simp only [not_and, Xor', not_or, not_not, ← iff_iff_implies_and_implies]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff (P Q : Prop) : Xor' P Q ↔ ¬ (P ↔ Q) := (not_xor P Q).not_right
theorem xor_iff_iff_not : Xor' a b ↔ (a ↔ ¬b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_right a, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff' : Xor' a b ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_left _ b, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_or_and_not_and (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b ↔ (a ∨ b) ∧ (¬ (a ∧ b)) := by
rw [Xor', or_and_right, not_and_or, and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, false_or,
and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, or_false]
end Propositional
/-! ### Membership -/
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem' := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem'
section Membership
variable {α β : Type*} [Membership α β] {p : Prop} [Decidable p]
theorem mem_dite {a : α} {s : p → β} {t : ¬p → β} :
(a ∈ if h : p then s h else t h) ↔ (∀ h, a ∈ s h) ∧ (∀ h, a ∈ t h) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem dite_mem {a : p → α} {b : ¬p → α} {s : β} :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ∈ s ↔ (∀ h, a h ∈ s) ∧ (∀ h, b h ∈ s) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem mem_ite {a : α} {s t : β} : (a ∈ if p then s else t) ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → a ∈ t) :=
mem_dite
theorem ite_mem {a b : α} {s : β} : (if p then a else b) ∈ s ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → b ∈ s) :=
dite_mem
end Membership
/-! ### Declarations about equality -/
section Equality
-- todo: change name
theorem forall_cond_comm {α} {s : α → Prop} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a, s a → ∀ b, s b → p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, s a → s b → p a b :=
⟨fun h a b ha hb ↦ h a ha b hb, fun h a ha b hb ↦ h a b ha hb⟩
theorem forall_mem_comm {α β} [Membership α β] {s : β} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a (_ : a ∈ s) b (_ : b ∈ s), p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → p a b :=
forall_cond_comm
lemma ne_of_eq_of_ne {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b ≠ c) : a ≠ c := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
lemma ne_of_ne_of_eq {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : b = c) : a ≠ c := h₂ ▸ h₁
alias Eq.trans_ne := ne_of_eq_of_ne
alias Ne.trans_eq := ne_of_ne_of_eq
theorem eq_equivalence {α : Sort*} : Equivalence (@Eq α) :=
⟨Eq.refl, @Eq.symm _, @Eq.trans _⟩
-- These were migrated to Batteries but the `@[simp]` attributes were (mysteriously?) removed.
attribute [simp] eq_mp_eq_cast eq_mpr_eq_cast
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_left {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {a b : α} (h : a = b) :
congr (Eq.refl f) h = congr_arg f h := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_right {α β : Sort*} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) (a : α) :
congr h (Eq.refl a) = congr_fun h a := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_arg_refl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_arg f (Eq.refl a) = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_rfl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) : congr_fun (Eq.refl f) a = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_congr_arg {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) {a a' : α} (p : a = a') (b : β) :
congr_fun (congr_arg f p) b = congr_arg (fun a ↦ f a b) p := rfl
theorem Eq.rec_eq_cast {α : Sort _} {P : α → Sort _} {x y : α} (h : x = y) (z : P x) :
h ▸ z = cast (congr_arg P h) z := by induction h; rfl
theorem eqRec_heq' {α : Sort*} {a' : α} {motive : (a : α) → a' = a → Sort*}
(p : motive a' (rfl : a' = a')) {a : α} (t : a' = a) :
HEq (@Eq.rec α a' motive p a t) p := by
subst t; rfl
theorem rec_heq_of_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β}
(e : a = b) (h : HEq x y) : HEq (e ▸ x) y := by subst e; exact h
theorem rec_heq_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β} {e : a = b} :
HEq (e ▸ x) y ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
theorem heq_rec_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : β} {y : C a} {e : a = b} :
HEq x (e ▸ y) ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_heq_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : α = β) (a : α) (c : γ) :
HEq (cast e a) c ↔ HEq a c := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem heq_cast_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : β = γ) (a : α) (b : β) :
HEq a (cast e b) ↔ HEq a b := by subst e; rfl
universe u
variable {α β : Sort u} {e : β = α} {a : α} {b : β}
lemma heq_of_eq_cast (e : β = α) : a = cast e b → HEq a b := by rintro rfl; simp
lemma eq_cast_iff_heq : a = cast e b ↔ HEq a b := ⟨heq_of_eq_cast _, fun h ↦ by cases h; rfl⟩
end Equality
/-! ### Declarations about quantifiers -/
section Quantifiers
section Dependent
variable {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*}
theorem forall₂_imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∀ a b, p a b) → ∀ a b, q a b :=
forall_imp fun i ↦ forall_imp <| h i
theorem forall₃_imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∀ a b c, p a b c) → ∀ a b c, q a b c :=
forall_imp fun a ↦ forall₂_imp <| h a
theorem Exists₂.imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∃ a b, p a b) → ∃ a b, q a b :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists.imp <| h a
theorem Exists₃.imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∃ a b c, p a b c) → ∃ a b c, q a b c :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists₂.imp <| h a
end Dependent
variable {α β : Sort*} {p : α → Prop}
theorem forall_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun f x y ↦ f y x, fun f x y ↦ f y x⟩
theorem forall₂_swap
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∀ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := ⟨swap₂, swap₂⟩
/-- We intentionally restrict the type of `α` in this lemma so that this is a safer to use in simp
than `forall_swap`. -/
theorem imp_forall_iff {α : Type*} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} : (p → ∀ x, q x) ↔ ∀ x, p → q x :=
forall_swap
lemma imp_forall_iff_forall (A : Prop) (B : A → Prop) :
(A → ∀ h : A, B h) ↔ ∀ h : A, B h := by by_cases h : A <;> simp [h]
theorem exists_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x y, p x y) ↔ ∃ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun ⟨x, y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨y, x, h⟩, fun ⟨y, x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
theorem exists_and_exists_comm {P : α → Prop} {Q : β → Prop} :
(∃ a, P a) ∧ (∃ b, Q b) ↔ ∃ a b, P a ∧ Q b :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩, fun ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩⟩
export Classical (not_forall)
theorem not_forall_not : (¬∀ x, ¬p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_forall_not
export Classical (not_exists_not)
lemma forall_or_exists_not (P : α → Prop) : (∀ a, P a) ∨ ∃ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_forall]; exact em _
lemma exists_or_forall_not (P : α → Prop) : (∃ a, P a) ∨ ∀ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_exists]; exact em _
theorem forall_imp_iff_exists_imp {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} [ha : Nonempty α] :
(∀ x, p x) → b ↔ ∃ x, p x → b := by
classical
let ⟨a⟩ := ha
refine ⟨fun h ↦ not_forall_not.1 fun h' ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ h ↦ hx (h x)⟩
exact if hb : b then h' a fun _ ↦ hb else hb <| h fun x ↦ (_root_.not_imp.1 (h' x)).1
@[mfld_simps]
theorem forall_true_iff : (α → True) ↔ True := imp_true_iff _
-- Unfortunately this causes simp to loop sometimes, so we
-- add the 2 and 3 cases as simp lemmas instead
theorem forall_true_iff' (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ True) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ ↦ of_iff_true (h _)
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₂_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} : (∀ a, β a → True) ↔ True := by simp
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₃_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*} :
(∀ (a) (b : β a), γ a b → True) ↔ True := by simp
theorem Decidable.and_forall_ne [DecidableEq α] (a : α) {p : α → Prop} :
(p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b := by
simp only [← @forall_eq _ p a, ← forall_and, ← or_imp, Decidable.em, forall_const]
theorem and_forall_ne (a : α) : (p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_forall_ne a
theorem Ne.ne_or_ne {x y : α} (z : α) (h : x ≠ y) : x ≠ z ∨ y ≠ z :=
not_and_or.1 <| mt (and_imp.2 (· ▸ ·)) h.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_apply_eq_apply' (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a' = f a := ⟨a', rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2 {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f x y = f a b :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2' {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f a b = f x y :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3 {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f x y z = f a b c :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3' {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f a b c = f x y z :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
/--
The constant function witnesses that
there exists a function sending a given term to a given term.
This is sometimes useful in `simp` to discharge side conditions.
-/
theorem exists_apply_eq (a : α) (b : β) : ∃ f : α → β, f a = b := ⟨fun _ ↦ b, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b) ∧ q b) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ q (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, hab⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, hab.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, hp, hq⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, hp, rfl⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, f a = b) ∧ p b) ↔ ∃ a, p (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, rfl⟩, ha⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_exists_and_eq_and {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ f a b = c) ∧ r c) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ r (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_exists_and_eq {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, ∃ b, f a b = c) ∧ p c) ↔ ∃ a, ∃ b, p (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, b, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, b, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, f a = b → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by simp
theorem forall_eq_apply_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, b = f a → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by simp
theorem exists₂_comm
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∃ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∃ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := by
simp only [@exists_comm (κ₁ _), @exists_comm ι₁]
theorem And.exists {p q : Prop} {f : p ∧ q → Prop} : (∃ h, f h) ↔ ∃ hp hq, f ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨h, H⟩ ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2, H⟩, fun ⟨hp, hq, H⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨hp, hq⟩, H⟩⟩
theorem forall_or_of_or_forall {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} (h : b ∨ ∀ x, p x) (x : α) :
b ∨ p x :=
h.imp_right fun h₂ ↦ h₂ x
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.forall_or_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} [Decidable q] :
(∀ x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ ∀ x, p x :=
⟨fun h ↦ if hq : q then Or.inl hq else
Or.inr fun x ↦ (h x).resolve_left hq, forall_or_of_or_forall⟩
theorem forall_or_left {q} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ ∀ x, p x :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.forall_or_left
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.forall_or_right {q} {p : α → Prop} [Decidable q] :
(∀ x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ q := by simp [or_comm, Decidable.forall_or_left]
theorem forall_or_right {q} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ q :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.forall_or_right
theorem Exists.fst {b : Prop} {p : b → Prop} : Exists p → b
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem Exists.snd {b : Prop} {p : b → Prop} : ∀ h : Exists p, p h.fst
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
theorem Prop.exists_iff {p : Prop → Prop} : (∃ h, p h) ↔ p False ∨ p True :=
⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ by_cases (fun H : h₁ ↦ .inr <| by simpa only [H] using h₂)
(fun H ↦ .inl <| by simpa only [H] using h₂), fun h ↦ h.elim (.intro _) (.intro _)⟩
theorem Prop.forall_iff {p : Prop → Prop} : (∀ h, p h) ↔ p False ∧ p True :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h ↦ by by_cases H : h <;> simpa only [H]⟩
theorem exists_iff_of_forall {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : ∀ h, q h) : (∃ h, q h) ↔ p :=
⟨Exists.fst, fun H ↦ ⟨H, h H⟩⟩
theorem exists_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} : ¬p → ¬∃ h' : p, q h' :=
mt Exists.fst
/- See `IsEmpty.exists_iff` for the `False` version of `exists_true_left`. -/
theorem forall_prop_congr {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop} (hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') :
(∀ h, q h) ↔ ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
⟨fun h1 h2 ↦ (hq _).1 (h1 (hp.2 h2)), fun h1 h2 ↦ (hq _).2 (h1 (hp.1 h2))⟩
theorem forall_prop_congr' {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop} (hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') :
(∀ h, q h) = ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
propext (forall_prop_congr hq hp)
lemma imp_congr_eq {a b c d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr h₁.to_iff h₂.to_iff)
lemma imp_congr_ctx_eq {a b c d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : c → b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr_ctx h₁.to_iff fun hc ↦ (h₂ hc).to_iff)
lemma eq_true_intro {a : Prop} (h : a) : a = True := propext (iff_true_intro h)
lemma eq_false_intro {a : Prop} (h : ¬a) : a = False := propext (iff_false_intro h)
-- FIXME: `alias` creates `def Iff.eq := propext` instead of `lemma Iff.eq := propext`
@[nolint defLemma] alias Iff.eq := propext
lemma iff_eq_eq {a b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) = (a = b) := propext ⟨propext, Eq.to_iff⟩
-- They were not used in Lean 3 and there are already lemmas with those names in Lean 4
/-- See `IsEmpty.forall_iff` for the `False` version. -/
@[simp] theorem forall_true_left (p : True → Prop) : (∀ x, p x) ↔ p True.intro :=
forall_prop_of_true _
end Quantifiers
/-! ### Classical lemmas -/
namespace Classical
-- use shortened names to avoid conflict when classical namespace is open.
/-- Any prop `p` is decidable classically. A shorthand for `Classical.propDecidable`. -/
noncomputable def dec (p : Prop) : Decidable p := by infer_instance
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Any predicate `p` is decidable classically. -/
noncomputable def decPred (p : α → Prop) : DecidablePred p := by infer_instance
/-- Any relation `p` is decidable classically. -/
noncomputable def decRel (p : α → α → Prop) : DecidableRel p := by infer_instance
/-- Any type `α` has decidable equality classically. -/
noncomputable def decEq (α : Sort*) : DecidableEq α := by infer_instance
/-- Construct a function from a default value `H0`, and a function to use if there exists a value
satisfying the predicate. -/
noncomputable def existsCases {α C : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (H0 : C) (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
if h : ∃ a, p a then H (Classical.choose h) (Classical.choose_spec h) else H0
theorem some_spec₂ {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {h : ∃ a, p a} (q : α → Prop)
(hpq : ∀ a, p a → q a) : q (choose h) := hpq _ <| choose_spec _
/-- A version of `byContradiction` that uses types instead of propositions. -/
protected noncomputable def byContradiction' {α : Sort*} (H : ¬(α → False)) : α :=
Classical.choice <| (peirce _ False) fun h ↦ (H fun a ↦ h ⟨a⟩).elim
/-- `Classical.byContradiction'` is equivalent to lean's axiom `Classical.choice`. -/
def choice_of_byContradiction' {α : Sort*} (contra : ¬(α → False) → α) : Nonempty α → α :=
fun H ↦ contra H.elim
@[simp] lemma choose_eq (a : α) : @Exists.choose _ (· = a) ⟨a, rfl⟩ = a := @choose_spec _ (· = a) _
@[simp]
lemma choose_eq' (a : α) : @Exists.choose _ (a = ·) ⟨a, rfl⟩ = a :=
(@choose_spec _ (a = ·) _).symm
alias axiom_of_choice := axiomOfChoice -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
alias by_cases := byCases -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
alias by_contradiction := byContradiction -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
-- The remaining theorems in this section were ported from Lean 3,
-- but are currently unused in Mathlib, so have been deprecated.
-- If any are being used downstream, please remove the deprecation.
alias prop_complete := propComplete -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
end Classical
/-- This function has the same type as `Exists.recOn`, and can be used to case on an equality,
but `Exists.recOn` can only eliminate into Prop, while this version eliminates into any universe
using the axiom of choice. -/
noncomputable def Exists.classicalRecOn {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃ a, p a)
{C : Sort*} (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
H (Classical.choose h) (Classical.choose_spec h)
/-! ### Declarations about bounded quantifiers -/
section BoundedQuantifiers
variable {α : Sort*} {r p q : α → Prop} {P Q : ∀ x, p x → Prop}
theorem bex_def : (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), q x) ↔ ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun ⟨x, px, qx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, fun ⟨x, px, qx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, px, qx⟩⟩
theorem BEx.elim {b : Prop} : (∃ x h, P x h) → (∀ a h, P a h → b) → b
| ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩, h' => h' a h₁ h₂
theorem BEx.intro (a : α) (h₁ : p a) (h₂ : P a h₁) : ∃ (x : _) (h : p x), P x h :=
⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
theorem BAll.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, P x h → Q x h) (h₁ : ∀ x h, P x h) (x h) : Q x h :=
H _ _ <| h₁ _ _
theorem BEx.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, P x h → Q x h) : (∃ x h, P x h) → ∃ x h, Q x h
| ⟨_, _, h'⟩ => ⟨_, _, H _ _ h'⟩
theorem BAll.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x) (h₁ : ∀ x, q x → r x) (x) (h : p x) : r x :=
h₁ _ <| H _ h
theorem BEx.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x) : (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), r x) → ∃ (x : _) (_ : q x), r x
| ⟨x, hp, hr⟩ => ⟨x, H _ hp, hr⟩
theorem exists_mem_of_exists (H : ∀ x, p x) : (∃ x, q x) → ∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), q x
| ⟨x, hq⟩ => ⟨x, H x, hq⟩
theorem exists_of_exists_mem : (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), q x) → ∃ x, q x
| ⟨x, _, hq⟩ => ⟨x, hq⟩
theorem not_exists_mem : (¬∃ x h, P x h) ↔ ∀ x h, ¬P x h := exists₂_imp
theorem not_forall₂_of_exists₂_not : (∃ x h, ¬P x h) → ¬∀ x h, P x h
| ⟨x, h, hp⟩, al => hp <| al x h
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.not_forall₂ [Decidable (∃ x h, ¬P x h)] [∀ x h, Decidable (P x h)] :
(¬∀ x h, P x h) ↔ ∃ x h, ¬P x h :=
⟨Not.decidable_imp_symm fun nx x h ↦ nx.decidable_imp_symm
fun h' ↦ ⟨x, h, h'⟩, not_forall₂_of_exists₂_not⟩
theorem not_forall₂ : (¬∀ x h, P x h) ↔ ∃ x h, ¬P x h :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_forall₂
theorem forall₂_and : (∀ x h, P x h ∧ Q x h) ↔ (∀ x h, P x h) ∧ ∀ x h, Q x h :=
Iff.trans (forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_and) forall_and
theorem forall_and_left [Nonempty α] (q : Prop) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, q ∧ p x) ↔ (q ∧ ∀ x, p x) := by rw [forall_and, forall_const]
theorem forall_and_right [Nonempty α] (p : α → Prop) (q : Prop) :
(∀ x, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∧ q := by rw [forall_and, forall_const]
theorem exists_mem_or : (∃ x h, P x h ∨ Q x h) ↔ (∃ x h, P x h) ∨ ∃ x h, Q x h :=
Iff.trans (exists_congr fun _ ↦ exists_or) exists_or
theorem forall₂_or_left : (∀ x, p x ∨ q x → r x) ↔ (∀ x, p x → r x) ∧ ∀ x, q x → r x :=
Iff.trans (forall_congr' fun _ ↦ or_imp) forall_and
theorem exists_mem_or_left :
(∃ (x : _) (_ : p x ∨ q x), r x) ↔ (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), r x) ∨ ∃ (x : _) (_ : q x), r x := by
simp only [exists_prop]
exact Iff.trans (exists_congr fun x ↦ or_and_right) exists_or
end BoundedQuantifiers
section ite
variable {α : Sort*} {σ : α → Sort*} {P Q R : Prop} [Decidable P]
{a b c : α} {A : P → α} {B : ¬P → α}
theorem dite_eq_iff : dite P A B = c ↔ (∃ h, A h = c) ∨ ∃ h, B h = c := by
by_cases P <;> simp [*, exists_prop_of_true, exists_prop_of_false]
theorem ite_eq_iff : ite P a b = c ↔ P ∧ a = c ∨ ¬P ∧ b = c :=
dite_eq_iff.trans <| by rw [exists_prop, exists_prop]
theorem eq_ite_iff : a = ite P b c ↔ P ∧ a = b ∨ ¬P ∧ a = c :=
eq_comm.trans <| ite_eq_iff.trans <| (Iff.rfl.and eq_comm).or (Iff.rfl.and eq_comm)
theorem dite_eq_iff' : dite P A B = c ↔ (∀ h, A h = c) ∧ ∀ h, B h = c :=
⟨fun he ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ (dif_pos h).symm.trans he, fun h ↦ (dif_neg h).symm.trans he⟩, fun he ↦
(em P).elim (fun h ↦ (dif_pos h).trans <| he.1 h) fun h ↦ (dif_neg h).trans <| he.2 h⟩
theorem ite_eq_iff' : ite P a b = c ↔ (P → a = c) ∧ (¬P → b = c) := dite_eq_iff'
theorem dite_ne_left_iff : dite P (fun _ ↦ a) B ≠ a ↔ ∃ h, a ≠ B h := by
rw [Ne, dite_eq_left_iff, not_forall]
exact exists_congr fun h ↦ by rw [ne_comm]
theorem dite_ne_right_iff : (dite P A fun _ ↦ b) ≠ b ↔ ∃ h, A h ≠ b := by
simp only [Ne, dite_eq_right_iff, not_forall]
theorem ite_ne_left_iff : ite P a b ≠ a ↔ ¬P ∧ a ≠ b :=
dite_ne_left_iff.trans <| by rw [exists_prop]
theorem ite_ne_right_iff : ite P a b ≠ b ↔ P ∧ a ≠ b :=
dite_ne_right_iff.trans <| by rw [exists_prop]
protected theorem Ne.dite_eq_left_iff (h : ∀ h, a ≠ B h) : dite P (fun _ ↦ a) B = a ↔ P :=
dite_eq_left_iff.trans ⟨fun H ↦ of_not_not fun h' ↦ h h' (H h').symm, fun h H ↦ (H h).elim⟩
protected theorem Ne.dite_eq_right_iff (h : ∀ h, A h ≠ b) : (dite P A fun _ ↦ b) = b ↔ ¬P :=
dite_eq_right_iff.trans ⟨fun H h' ↦ h h' (H h'), fun h' H ↦ (h' H).elim⟩
protected theorem Ne.ite_eq_left_iff (h : a ≠ b) : ite P a b = a ↔ P :=
Ne.dite_eq_left_iff fun _ ↦ h
protected theorem Ne.ite_eq_right_iff (h : a ≠ b) : ite P a b = b ↔ ¬P :=
Ne.dite_eq_right_iff fun _ ↦ h
protected theorem Ne.dite_ne_left_iff (h : ∀ h, a ≠ B h) : dite P (fun _ ↦ a) B ≠ a ↔ ¬P :=
dite_ne_left_iff.trans <| exists_iff_of_forall h
protected theorem Ne.dite_ne_right_iff (h : ∀ h, A h ≠ b) : (dite P A fun _ ↦ b) ≠ b ↔ P :=
dite_ne_right_iff.trans <| exists_iff_of_forall h
protected theorem Ne.ite_ne_left_iff (h : a ≠ b) : ite P a b ≠ a ↔ ¬P :=
Ne.dite_ne_left_iff fun _ ↦ h
protected theorem Ne.ite_ne_right_iff (h : a ≠ b) : ite P a b ≠ b ↔ P :=
Ne.dite_ne_right_iff fun _ ↦ h
variable (P Q a b)
theorem dite_eq_or_eq : (∃ h, dite P A B = A h) ∨ ∃ h, dite P A B = B h :=
if h : _ then .inl ⟨h, dif_pos h⟩ else .inr ⟨h, dif_neg h⟩
theorem ite_eq_or_eq : ite P a b = a ∨ ite P a b = b :=
if h : _ then .inl (if_pos h) else .inr (if_neg h)
/-- A two-argument function applied to two `dite`s is a `dite` of that two-argument function
applied to each of the branches. -/
| theorem apply_dite₂ {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) (P : Prop) [Decidable P]
| Mathlib/Logic/Basic.lean | 881 | 881 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Curry
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions.SumProd
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs pi types, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
open scoped Set.Notation
universe u v u' v'
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 x.toMul = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 x.toAdd = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance OrderDual.instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instDiscreteTopology [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
variable [Preorder X] {x : X}
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [(𝓝[<] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [(𝓝[>] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_nhdsWithin_range {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β) (y : β) :
comap f (𝓝[range f] y) = comap f (𝓝 y) := comap_inf_principal_range
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
lemma nhds_subtype_eq_comap_nhdsWithin (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝[s] (x : X)) := by
rw [nhds_subtype, ← comap_nhdsWithin_range, Subtype.range_val]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
theorem MapClusterPt.curry_prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la.curry lb) (.map f g) := by
rw [mapClusterPt_iff_frequently] at hf hg
rw [((𝓝 x).basis_sets.prod_nhds (𝓝 y).basis_sets).mapClusterPt_iff_frequently]
rintro ⟨s, t⟩ ⟨hs, ht⟩
rw [frequently_curry_iff]
exact (hf s hs).mono fun x hx ↦ (hg t ht).mono fun y hy ↦ ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem MapClusterPt.prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la ×ˢ lb) (.map f g) :=
(hf.curry_prodMap hg).mono <| map_mono curry_le_prod
end Prod
section Bool
lemma continuous_bool_rng [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → Bool} (b : Bool) :
Continuous f ↔ IsClopen (f ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [continuous_discrete_rng, Bool.forall_bool' b, IsClopen, ← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl,
Bool.compl_singleton, and_comm]
end Bool
section Subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {p : X → Prop}
lemma Topology.IsInducing.subtypeVal {t : Set Y} : IsInducing ((↑) : t → Y) := ⟨rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_subtype_val := IsInducing.subtypeVal
lemma Topology.IsInducing.of_codRestrict {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (ht : ∀ x, f x ∈ t)
(h : IsInducing (t.codRestrict f ht)) : IsInducing f := subtypeVal.comp h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.of_codRestrict := IsInducing.of_codRestrict
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.subtypeVal : IsEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, Subtype.coe_injective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")] alias embedding_subtype_val := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.subtypeVal (h : IsClosed {a | p a}) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, by rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_subtype_val : Continuous (@Subtype.val X p) :=
continuous_induced_dom
theorem Continuous.subtype_val {f : Y → Subtype p} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun x => (f x : X) :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp hf
theorem IsOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, (@Subtype.range_coe _ s).symm ▸ hs⟩
theorem IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpenMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpenMap
theorem IsOpenMap.restrict {f : X → Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrict f) :=
hf.comp hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) := .subtypeVal hs
theorem IsClosed.isClosedMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal.isClosedMap
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.subtype_mk {f : Y → X} (h : Continuous f) (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
Continuous fun x => (⟨f x, hp x⟩ : Subtype p) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 h
theorem Continuous.subtype_map {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) {q : Y → Prop}
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) : Continuous (Subtype.map f hpq) :=
(h.comp continuous_subtype_val).subtype_mk _
theorem continuous_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (inclusion h) :=
continuous_id.subtype_map h
theorem continuousAt_subtype_val {p : X → Prop} {x : Subtype p} :
ContinuousAt ((↑) : Subtype p → X) x :=
continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt
theorem Subtype.dense_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set s} : Dense t ↔ s ⊆ closure ((↑) '' t) := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, SetCoe.forall]
rfl
theorem map_nhds_subtype_val {s : Set X} (x : s) : map ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[s] ↑x := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.map_nhds_eq, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds {x : X} (hx : p x) (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) :
map ((↑) : Subtype p → X) (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
map_nhds_induced_of_mem <| by rw [Subtype.range_val]; exact h
theorem nhds_subtype_eq_comap {x : X} {h : p x} : 𝓝 (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) = comap (↑) (𝓝 x) :=
nhds_induced _ _
theorem tendsto_subtype_rng {Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → Subtype p} :
∀ {x : Subtype p}, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : X)) l (𝓝 (x : X))
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => by rw [nhds_subtype_eq_comap, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem closure_subtype {x : { a // p a }} {s : Set { a // p a }} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ (x : X) ∈ closure (((↑) : _ → X) '' s) :=
closure_induced
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_codRestrict_iff {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (h1 : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) {x : X} :
ContinuousAt (codRestrict f t h1) x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.continuousAt_iff
alias ⟨_, ContinuousAt.codRestrict⟩ := continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
theorem ContinuousAt.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t) {x : s}
(h2 : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (h1.restrict f s t) x :=
(h2.comp continuousAt_subtype_val).codRestrict _
theorem ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} {x : f ⁻¹' s} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (s.restrictPreimage f) x :=
h.restrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.codRestrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a, f a ∈ s) :
Continuous (s.codRestrict f hs) :=
hf.subtype_mk hs
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t)
(h2 : Continuous f) : Continuous (h1.restrict f s t) :=
(h2.comp continuous_subtype_val).codRestrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
h.restrict _
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) :
IsEmbedding H.restrict :=
.of_comp (hf.continuous.restrict H) continuous_subtype_val (hf.comp .subtypeVal)
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding H.restrict :=
⟨hf.isEmbedding.restrict H, (by
rw [MapsTo.range_restrict]
exact continuous_subtype_val.1 _ (hf.isOpenMap _ hs))⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsInducing e) {s : Set Y}
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsInducing (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.codRestrict := IsInducing.codRestrict
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsEmbedding e) (s : Set Y)
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsEmbedding (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.codRestrict := IsEmbedding.codRestrict
variable {s t : Set X}
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) :
IsEmbedding (inclusion h) := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.codRestrict _ _
protected lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsOpen (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsOpenEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isOpen_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
protected lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsClosed (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsClosedEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isClosed_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_inclusion := IsEmbedding.inclusion
/-- Let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets of a topological space `X`. If `t ⊆ s` and the topology induced
by `X`on `s` is discrete, then also the topology induces on `t` is discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_subset {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {s t : Set X}
(_ : DiscreteTopology s) (ts : t ⊆ s) : DiscreteTopology t :=
(IsEmbedding.inclusion ts).discreteTopology
/-- Let `s` be a discrete subset of a topological space. Then the preimage of `s` by
a continuous injective map is also discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.preimage_of_continuous_injective {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] (s : Set Y) [DiscreteTopology s] {f : X → Y} (hc : Continuous f)
(hinj : Function.Injective f) : DiscreteTopology (f ⁻¹' s) :=
DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective (β := s) (Continuous.restrict
(by exact fun _ x ↦ x) hc) ((MapsTo.restrict_inj _).mpr hinj.injOn)
/-- If `f : X → Y` is a quotient map,
then its restriction to the preimage of an open set is a quotient map too. -/
theorem Topology.IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen {f : X → Y} (hf : IsQuotientMap f)
{s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsQuotientMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
refine isQuotientMap_iff.2 ⟨hf.surjective.restrictPreimage _, fun U ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen, ← hf.isOpen_preimage,
(hs.preimage hf.continuous).isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen,
image_val_preimage_restrictPreimage]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias QuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen := IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen
open scoped Set.Notation in
lemma isClosed_preimage_val {s t : Set X} : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ s ∩ closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ t := by
rw [← closure_eq_iff_isClosed, IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image,
← Subtype.val_injective.image_injective.eq_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_coe,
Subtype.image_preimage_coe, subset_antisymm_iff, and_iff_left, Set.subset_inter_iff,
and_iff_right]
exacts [Set.inter_subset_left, Set.subset_inter Set.inter_subset_left subset_closure]
theorem frontier_inter_open_inter {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ∩ t = frontier s ∩ t := by
simp only [Set.inter_comm _ t, ← Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff,
ht.isOpenMap_subtype_val.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_subtype_val,
Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter]
section SetNotation
open scoped Set.Notation
lemma IsOpen.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
@[simp] lemma IsOpen.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsOpen (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
@[simp] lemma IsClosed.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsClosed (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isClosedMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
end SetNotation
end Subtype
section Quotient
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable {r : X → X → Prop} {s : Setoid X}
theorem isQuotientMap_quot_mk : IsQuotientMap (@Quot.mk X r) :=
⟨Quot.exists_rep, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quot_mk := isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_mk : Continuous (@Quot.mk X r) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_lift {f : X → Y} (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → f a = f b) (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (Quot.lift f hr : Quot r → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem isQuotientMap_quotient_mk' : IsQuotientMap (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quotient_mk' := isQuotientMap_quotient_mk'
theorem continuous_quotient_mk' : Continuous (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem Continuous.quotient_lift {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a b, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (Quotient.lift f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem Continuous.quotient_liftOn' {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f)
(hs : ∀ a b, s a b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (fun x => Quotient.liftOn' x f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
h.quotient_lift hs
open scoped Relator in
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.quotient_map' {t : Setoid Y} {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(H : (s.r ⇒ t.r) f f) : Continuous (Quotient.map' f H) :=
(continuous_quotient_mk'.comp hf).quotient_lift _
end Quotient
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} {κ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[T : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {f : X → ∀ i : ι, π i}
theorem continuous_pi_iff : Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i := by
simp only [continuous_iInf_rng, continuous_induced_rng, comp_def]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_pi (h : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i) : Continuous f :=
continuous_pi_iff.2 h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_apply (i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i :=
continuous_iInf_dom continuous_induced_dom
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_apply_apply {ρ : κ → ι → Type*} [∀ j i, TopologicalSpace (ρ j i)] (j : κ)
(i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ j, ∀ i, ρ j i => p j i :=
(continuous_apply i).comp (continuous_apply j)
theorem continuousAt_apply (i : ι) (x : ∀ i, π i) : ContinuousAt (fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i) x :=
(continuous_apply i).continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.apply_nhds {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) : Tendsto (fun a => f a i) l (𝓝 <| x i) :=
(continuousAt_apply i _).tendsto.comp h
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem Continuous.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous (f i)) : Continuous (Pi.map f) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuous_apply i)
theorem nhds_pi {a : ∀ i, π i} : 𝓝 a = pi fun i => 𝓝 (a i) := by
simp only [nhds_iInf, nhds_induced, Filter.pi]
protected theorem IsOpenMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)] {f : ∀ i, π i → Y i}
(hfo : ∀ i, IsOpenMap (f i)) (hsurj : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, Surjective (f i)) :
IsOpenMap (Pi.map f) := by
refine IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le fun x ↦ ?_
rw [nhds_pi, nhds_pi, map_piMap_pi hsurj]
exact Filter.pi_mono fun i ↦ (hfo i).nhds_le _
protected theorem IsOpenQuotientMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, IsOpenQuotientMap (f i)) : IsOpenQuotientMap (Pi.map f) :=
⟨.piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).1, .piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).2, .piMap (fun i ↦ (hf i).3) <|
.of_forall fun i ↦ (hf i).1⟩
theorem tendsto_pi_nhds {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {g : ∀ i, π i} {u : Filter Y} :
Tendsto f u (𝓝 g) ↔ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun i => f i x) u (𝓝 (g x)) := by
rw [nhds_pi, Filter.tendsto_pi]
theorem continuousAt_pi {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x :=
tendsto_pi_nhds
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_pi' {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 hf
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem ContinuousAt.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} {x : ∀ i, π i} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (f i) (x i)) :
ContinuousAt (Pi.map f) x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuousAt_apply i x)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) :=
continuous_pi fun j ↦ continuous_apply (φ j)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (· ∘ φ : (ι → X) → (ι' → X)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' φ
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp' {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
{g : ∀ i, π i → X i} (hg : ∀ i, Continuous (g i)) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (i : ι) ↦ g i (f i)) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hg i).comp <| continuous_apply i
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : X → Y} (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (g ∘ · : (ι → X) → (ι → Y)) :=
Pi.continuous_postcomp' fun _ ↦ hg
lemma Pi.induced_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) (T (φ i')) := by
simp [Pi.topologicalSpace, induced_iInf, induced_compose, comp_def]
lemma Pi.induced_precomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (· ∘ φ) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) ‹TopologicalSpace Y› :=
induced_precomp' φ
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict (S : Set ι) :
Continuous (S.restrict : (∀ i : ι, π i) → (∀ i : S, π i)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Set ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict (s : Finset ι) : Continuous (s.restrict (π := π)) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Finset ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) :
Continuous (Finset.restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
variable [TopologicalSpace Z]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Set X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Set X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Finset X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Finset X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
lemma Pi.induced_restrict (S : Set ι) :
induced (S.restrict) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i ∈ S, induced (eval i) (T i) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [← iInf_subtype'', ← induced_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι),
restrict]
lemma Pi.induced_restrict_sUnion (𝔖 : Set (Set ι)) :
induced (⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict (Pi.topologicalSpace (Y := fun i : (⋃₀ 𝔖) ↦ π i)) =
⨅ S ∈ 𝔖, induced S.restrict Pi.topologicalSpace := by
simp_rw [Pi.induced_restrict, iInf_sUnion]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.update [DecidableEq ι] {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) {g : Y → π i} {xi : π i} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 xi)) :
Tendsto (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) l (𝓝 <| update x i xi) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => by rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hj) <;> simp [*, hf.apply_nhds]
theorem ContinuousAt.update [DecidableEq ι] {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.update i hg
theorem Continuous.update [DecidableEq ι] (hf : Continuous f) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => update (f a) i (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.update i hg.continuousAt
/-- `Function.update f i x` is continuous in `(f, x)`. -/
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_update [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun f : (∀ j, π j) × π i => update f.1 i f.2 :=
continuous_fst.update i continuous_snd
/-- `Pi.mulSingle i x` is continuous in `x`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) "`Pi.single i x` is continuous in `x`."]
theorem continuous_mulSingle [∀ i, One (π i)] [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun x => (Pi.mulSingle i x : ∀ i, π i) :=
continuous_const.update _ continuous_id
section Fin
variable {n : ℕ} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finCons
{f : Y → π 0} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.succ} {l : Filter Y} {x : π 0} {y : ∀ j, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.cons x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.cases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finCons hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.matrixVecCons
{f : Y → Z} {g : Y → Fin n → Z} {l : Filter Y} {x : Z} {y : Fin n → Z}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Matrix.vecCons x y) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem ContinuousAt.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finSnoc
{f : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : Y → π (Fin.last _)}
{l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π (Fin.castSucc j)} {y : π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.snoc x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.lastCases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hf) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finSnoc hg
theorem Continuous.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finSnoc hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : Y → π i} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {l : Filter Y}
{x : π i} {y : ∀ j, π (i.succAbove j)} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| i.insertNth x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.succAboveCases i (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Filter.Tendsto.fin_insertNth := Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
theorem ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInsertNth i hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias ContinuousAt.fin_insertNth := ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
theorem Continuous.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finInsertNth i hg.continuousAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Continuous.fin_insertNth := Continuous.finInsertNth
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInit {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.init x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.castSucc
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInit
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finInit
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finTail {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.tail x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.succ
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finTail
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finTail
end Fin
theorem isOpen_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsOpen (s a)) : IsOpen (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact hi.isOpen_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
theorem isOpen_pi_iff {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ (I : Finset ι) (u : ∀ a, Set (π a)),
(∀ a, a ∈ I → IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ (I : Set ι).pi u ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine ⟨I, fun a => eval a '' (I : Set ι).pi fun a => (h1 a).choose, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [eval_image_pi (Finset.mem_coe.mpr hi)
(pi_nonempty_iff.mpr fun i => ⟨_, fun _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.2.2⟩)]
exact (h1 i).choose_spec.2
· exact Subset.trans
(pi_mono fun i hi => (eval_image_pi_subset hi).trans (h1 i).choose_spec.1) h2
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
classical
refine ⟨I, fun a => ite (a ∈ I) (t a) univ, fun i => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hi : i ∈ I
· use t i
simp_rw [if_pos hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, (h1 i) hi⟩
· use univ
simp_rw [if_neg hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, isOpen_univ, mem_univ _⟩
· rw [← univ_pi_ite]
simp only [← ite_and, ← Finset.mem_coe, and_self_iff, univ_pi_ite, h2]
theorem isOpen_pi_iff' [Finite ι] {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ u : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ univ.pi u ⊆ s := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose,
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose_spec.2,
(pi_mono fun i _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.1).trans (Subset.trans ?_ h2)⟩⟩
rw [← pi_inter_compl (I : Set ι)]
exact inter_subset_left
· exact fun ⟨u, ⟨h1, _⟩⟩ =>
⟨Finset.univ, u, ⟨fun i => ⟨u i, ⟨rfl.subset, h1 i⟩⟩, by rwa [Finset.coe_univ]⟩⟩
theorem isClosed_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsClosed (s a)) :
IsClosed (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact isClosed_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
theorem mem_nhds_of_pi_mem_nhds {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} (a : ∀ i, π i) (hs : I.pi s ∈ 𝓝 a)
{i : ι} (hi : i ∈ I) : s i ∈ 𝓝 (a i) := by
rw [nhds_pi] at hs; exact mem_of_pi_mem_pi hs hi
theorem set_pi_mem_nhds {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} {x : ∀ a, π a} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, s a ∈ 𝓝 (x a)) : pi i s ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [pi_def, biInter_mem hi]
exact fun a ha => (continuous_apply a).continuousAt (hs a ha)
theorem set_pi_mem_nhds_iff {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} (a : ∀ i, π i) :
I.pi s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∀ i : ι, i ∈ I → s i ∈ 𝓝 (a i) := by
rw [nhds_pi, pi_mem_pi_iff hI]
theorem interior_pi_set {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} :
interior (pi I s) = I.pi fun i => interior (s i) := by
ext a
simp only [Set.mem_pi, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, set_pi_mem_nhds_iff hI]
theorem exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds [DecidableEq ι] {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} {x : ∀ a, π a}
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (y : ∀ a, π a) : ∃ I : Finset ι, I.piecewise x y ∈ s := by
simp only [nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi'] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨I, t, htx, hts⟩
refine ⟨I, hts fun i hi => ?_⟩
simpa [Finset.mem_coe.1 hi] using mem_of_mem_nhds (htx i)
theorem pi_generateFrom_eq {π : ι → Type*} {g : ∀ a, Set (Set (π a))} :
(@Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun a => generateFrom (g a)) =
generateFrom
{ t | ∃ (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) (i : Finset ι), (∀ a ∈ i, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi (↑i) s } := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· apply le_generateFrom
rintro _ ⟨s, i, hi, rfl⟩
letI := fun a => generateFrom (g a)
exact isOpen_set_pi i.finite_toSet (fun a ha => GenerateOpen.basic _ (hi a ha))
· classical
refine le_iInf fun i => coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 <| le_generateFrom fun s hs => ?_
refine GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨update (fun i => univ) i s, {i}, ?_⟩
simp [hs]
theorem pi_eq_generateFrom :
Pi.topologicalSpace =
generateFrom
{ g | ∃ (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) (i : Finset ι), (∀ a ∈ i, IsOpen (s a)) ∧ g = pi (↑i) s } :=
calc Pi.topologicalSpace
_ = @Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun _ => generateFrom { s | IsOpen s } := by
simp only [generateFrom_setOf_isOpen]
_ = _ := pi_generateFrom_eq
theorem pi_generateFrom_eq_finite {π : ι → Type*} {g : ∀ a, Set (Set (π a))} [Finite ι]
(hg : ∀ a, ⋃₀ g a = univ) :
(@Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun a => generateFrom (g a)) =
generateFrom { t | ∃ s : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi univ s } := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [pi_generateFrom_eq]
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_anti ?_) (le_generateFrom ?_)
· exact fun s ⟨t, ht, Eq⟩ => ⟨t, Finset.univ, by simp [ht, Eq]⟩
· rintro s ⟨t, i, ht, rfl⟩
letI := generateFrom { t | ∃ s : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi univ s }
refine isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open.2 fun f hf => ?_
choose c hcg hfc using fun a => sUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (hg a) (f a)
refine ⟨pi i t ∩ pi ((↑i)ᶜ : Set ι) c, inter_subset_left, ?_, ⟨hf, fun a _ => hfc a⟩⟩
classical
rw [← univ_pi_piecewise]
refine GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, fun a => ?_, rfl⟩
by_cases a ∈ i <;> simp [*]
theorem induced_to_pi {X : Type*} (f : X → ∀ i, π i) :
induced f Pi.topologicalSpace = ⨅ i, induced (f · i) inferInstance := by
simp_rw [Pi.topologicalSpace, induced_iInf, induced_compose, Function.comp_def]
/-- Suppose `π i` is a family of topological spaces indexed by `i : ι`, and `X` is a type
endowed with a family of maps `f i : X → π i` for every `i : ι`, hence inducing a
map `g : X → Π i, π i`. This lemma shows that infimum of the topologies on `X` induced by
the `f i` as `i : ι` varies is simply the topology on `X` induced by `g : X → Π i, π i`
where `Π i, π i` is endowed with the usual product topology. -/
theorem inducing_iInf_to_pi {X : Type*} (f : ∀ i, X → π i) :
@IsInducing X (∀ i, π i) (⨅ i, induced (f i) inferInstance) _ fun x i => f i x :=
letI := ⨅ i, induced (f i) inferInstance; ⟨(induced_to_pi _).symm⟩
variable [Finite ι] [∀ i, DiscreteTopology (π i)]
/-- A finite product of discrete spaces is discrete. -/
instance Pi.discreteTopology : DiscreteTopology (∀ i, π i) :=
singletons_open_iff_discrete.mp fun x => by
rw [← univ_pi_singleton]
exact isOpen_set_pi finite_univ fun i _ => (isOpen_discrete {x i})
end Pi
section Sigma
variable {ι κ : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} {τ : κ → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (σ i)]
[∀ k, TopologicalSpace (τ k)] [TopologicalSpace X]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sigmaMk {i : ι} : Continuous (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
continuous_iSup_rng continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem isOpen_sigma_iff {s : Set (Sigma σ)} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [isOpen_iSup_iff]
rfl
theorem isClosed_sigma_iff {s : Set (Sigma σ)} : IsClosed s ↔ ∀ i, IsClosed (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_sigma_iff, preimage_compl]
theorem isOpenMap_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpenMap (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) := by
intro s hs
rw [isOpen_sigma_iff]
intro j
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [preimage_image_eq _ sigma_mk_injective]
· rw [preimage_image_sigmaMk_of_ne hne]
exact isOpen_empty
theorem isOpen_range_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpen (range (@Sigma.mk ι σ i)) :=
isOpenMap_sigmaMk.isOpen_range
theorem isClosedMap_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsClosedMap (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) := by
intro s hs
rw [isClosed_sigma_iff]
intro j
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [preimage_image_eq _ sigma_mk_injective]
· rw [preimage_image_sigmaMk_of_ne hne]
exact isClosed_empty
theorem isClosed_range_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsClosed (range (@Sigma.mk ι σ i)) :=
isClosedMap_sigmaMk.isClosed_range
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpenEmbedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
.of_continuous_injective_isOpenMap continuous_sigmaMk sigma_mk_injective isOpenMap_sigmaMk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")] alias isOpenEmbedding_sigmaMk := IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk
lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsClosedEmbedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
.of_continuous_injective_isClosedMap continuous_sigmaMk sigma_mk_injective isClosedMap_sigmaMk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")] alias isClosedEmbedding_sigmaMk := IsClosedEmbedding.sigmaMk
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsEmbedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
IsClosedEmbedding.sigmaMk.1
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_sigmaMk := IsEmbedding.sigmaMk
theorem Sigma.nhds_mk (i : ι) (x : σ i) : 𝓝 (⟨i, x⟩ : Sigma σ) = Filter.map (Sigma.mk i) (𝓝 x) :=
(IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk.map_nhds_eq x).symm
theorem Sigma.nhds_eq (x : Sigma σ) : 𝓝 x = Filter.map (Sigma.mk x.1) (𝓝 x.2) := by
cases x
apply Sigma.nhds_mk
theorem comap_sigmaMk_nhds (i : ι) (x : σ i) : comap (Sigma.mk i) (𝓝 ⟨i, x⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
(IsEmbedding.sigmaMk.nhds_eq_comap _).symm
theorem isOpen_sigma_fst_preimage (s : Set ι) : IsOpen (Sigma.fst ⁻¹' s : Set (Σ a, σ a)) := by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s, preimage_iUnion₂]
simp only [← range_sigmaMk]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_range_sigmaMk
/-- A map out of a sum type is continuous iff its restriction to each summand is. -/
@[simp]
theorem continuous_sigma_iff {f : Sigma σ → X} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩ := by
delta instTopologicalSpaceSigma
rw [continuous_iSup_dom]
exact forall_congr' fun _ => continuous_coinduced_dom
/-- A map out of a sum type is continuous if its restriction to each summand is. -/
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_sigma_iff.2 hf
/-- A map defined on a sigma type (a.k.a. the disjoint union of an indexed family of topological
spaces) is inducing iff its restriction to each component is inducing and each the image of each
component under `f` can be separated from the images of all other components by an open set. -/
theorem inducing_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} :
IsInducing f ↔ (∀ i, IsInducing (f ∘ Sigma.mk i)) ∧
(∀ i, ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ U ↔ x.1 = i) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun i ↦ h.comp IsEmbedding.sigmaMk.1, fun i ↦ ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rcases h.isOpen_iff.1 (isOpen_range_sigmaMk (i := i)) with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
refine ⟨U, hUo, ?_⟩
simpa [Set.ext_iff] using hU
· refine fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ isInducing_iff_nhds.2 fun ⟨i, x⟩ ↦ ?_
rw [Sigma.nhds_mk, (h₁ i).nhds_eq_comap, comp_apply, ← comap_comap, map_comap_of_mem]
rcases h₂ i with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap <| hUo.mem_nhds <| (hU _).2 rfl] with y hy
simpa [hU] using hy
@[simp 1100]
theorem continuous_sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} :
Continuous (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (f₂ i) :=
continuous_sigma_iff.trans <| by
simp only [Sigma.map, IsEmbedding.sigmaMk.continuous_iff, comp_def]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous (f₂ i)) :
Continuous (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) :=
continuous_sigma_map.2 hf
theorem isOpenMap_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} : IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenMap fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩ := by
simp only [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Sigma.forall, Sigma.nhds_eq, map_map, comp_def]
theorem isOpenMap_sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} :
IsOpenMap (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenMap (f₂ i) :=
isOpenMap_sigma.trans <|
forall_congr' fun i => (@IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk _ _ _ (f₁ i)).isOpenMap_iff.symm
lemma Topology.isInducing_sigmaMap {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)}
(h₁ : Injective f₁) : IsInducing (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsInducing (f₂ i) := by
simp only [isInducing_iff_nhds, Sigma.forall, Sigma.nhds_mk, Sigma.map_mk,
← map_sigma_mk_comap h₁, map_inj sigma_mk_injective]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_sigma_map := isInducing_sigmaMap
lemma Topology.isEmbedding_sigmaMap {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)}
(h : Injective f₁) : IsEmbedding (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsEmbedding (f₂ i) := by
simp only [isEmbedding_iff, Injective.sigma_map, isInducing_sigmaMap h, forall_and,
h.sigma_map_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_sigma_map := isEmbedding_sigmaMap
lemma Topology.isOpenEmbedding_sigmaMap {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} (h : Injective f₁) :
IsOpenEmbedding (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenEmbedding (f₂ i) := by
simp only [isOpenEmbedding_iff_isEmbedding_isOpenMap, isOpenMap_sigma_map, isEmbedding_sigmaMap h,
forall_and]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")] alias isOpenEmbedding_sigma_map := isOpenEmbedding_sigmaMap
end Sigma
section ULift
theorem ULift.isOpen_iff [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set (ULift.{v} X)} :
IsOpen s ↔ IsOpen (ULift.up ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [ULift.topologicalSpace, ← Equiv.ulift_apply, ← Equiv.ulift.coinduced_symm, ← isOpen_coinduced]
theorem ULift.isClosed_iff [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set (ULift.{v} X)} :
IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed (ULift.up ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, ← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff, preimage_compl]
|
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_uliftDown [TopologicalSpace X] : Continuous (ULift.down : ULift.{v, u} X → X) :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 1,149 | 1,151 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Lex
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
/-!
# Variables of polynomials
This file establishes many results about the variable sets of a multivariate polynomial.
The *variable set* of a polynomial $P \in R[X]$ is a `Finset` containing each $x \in X$
that appears in a monomial in $P$.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.vars p` : the finset of variables occurring in `p`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `vars p = {x, y, z}`
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Vars
/-! ### `vars` -/
/-- `vars p` is the set of variables appearing in the polynomial `p` -/
def vars (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.degrees.toFinset
theorem vars_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.vars = p.degrees.toFinset := by
rw [vars]
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem vars_0 : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_zero, Multiset.toFinset_zero]
@[simp]
theorem vars_monomial (h : r ≠ 0) : (monomial s r).vars = s.support := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_monomial_eq _ _ h, Finsupp.toFinset_toMultiset]
@[simp]
theorem vars_C : (C r : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_C, Multiset.toFinset_zero]
@[simp]
theorem vars_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = {n} := by
rw [X, vars_monomial (one_ne_zero' R), Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ (one_ne_zero' ℕ)]
theorem mem_vars (i : σ) : i ∈ p.vars ↔ ∃ d ∈ p.support, i ∈ d.support := by
classical simp only [vars_def, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_degrees, mem_support_iff, exists_prop]
theorem mem_support_not_mem_vars_zero {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {x : σ →₀ ℕ} (H : x ∈ f.support)
{v : σ} (h : v ∉ vars f) : x v = 0 := by
contrapose! h
exact (mem_vars v).mpr ⟨x, H, Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mpr h⟩
theorem vars_add_subset [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p + q).vars ⊆ p.vars ∪ q.vars := by
intro x hx
simp only [vars_def, Finset.mem_union, Multiset.mem_toFinset] at hx ⊢
simpa using Multiset.mem_of_le degrees_add_le hx
theorem vars_add_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (h : Disjoint p.vars q.vars) :
(p + q).vars = p.vars ∪ q.vars := by
refine (vars_add_subset p q).antisymm fun x hx => ?_
simp only [vars_def, Multiset.disjoint_toFinset] at h hx ⊢
rwa [degrees_add_of_disjoint h, Multiset.toFinset_union]
section Mul
theorem vars_mul [DecidableEq σ] (φ ψ : MvPolynomial σ R) : (φ * ψ).vars ⊆ φ.vars ∪ ψ.vars := by
simp_rw [vars_def, ← Multiset.toFinset_add, Multiset.toFinset_subset]
exact Multiset.subset_of_le degrees_mul_le
@[simp]
theorem vars_one : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ :=
vars_C
theorem vars_pow (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ) : (φ ^ n).vars ⊆ φ.vars := by
classical
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ']
apply Finset.Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
exact Finset.union_subset (Finset.Subset.refl _) ih
/-- The variables of the product of a family of polynomials
are a subset of the union of the sets of variables of each polynomial.
-/
theorem vars_prod {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset ι} (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).vars ⊆ s.biUnion fun i => (f i).vars := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hs hsub =>
simp only [hs, Finset.biUnion_insert, Finset.prod_insert, not_false_iff]
apply Finset.Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
exact Finset.union_subset_union (Finset.Subset.refl _) hsub
section IsDomain
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [NoZeroDivisors A]
theorem vars_C_mul (a : A) (ha : a ≠ 0) (φ : MvPolynomial σ A) :
(C a * φ : MvPolynomial σ A).vars = φ.vars := by
ext1 i
simp only [mem_vars, exists_prop, mem_support_iff]
apply exists_congr
intro d
apply and_congr _ Iff.rfl
rw [coeff_C_mul, mul_ne_zero_iff, eq_true ha, true_and]
end IsDomain
end Mul
section Sum
variable {ι : Type*} (t : Finset ι) (φ : ι → MvPolynomial σ R)
theorem vars_sum_subset [DecidableEq σ] :
(∑ i ∈ t, φ i).vars ⊆ Finset.biUnion t fun i => (φ i).vars := by
classical
induction t using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has hsum =>
rw [Finset.biUnion_insert, Finset.sum_insert has]
refine Finset.Subset.trans
(vars_add_subset _ _) (Finset.union_subset_union (Finset.Subset.refl _) ?_)
assumption
theorem vars_sum_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (h : Pairwise <| (Disjoint on fun i => (φ i).vars)) :
(∑ i ∈ t, φ i).vars = Finset.biUnion t fun i => (φ i).vars := by
classical
induction t using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has hsum =>
rw [Finset.biUnion_insert, Finset.sum_insert has, vars_add_of_disjoint, hsum]
unfold Pairwise onFun at h
rw [hsum]
simp only [Finset.disjoint_iff_ne] at h ⊢
intro v hv v2 hv2
rw [Finset.mem_biUnion] at hv2
rcases hv2 with ⟨i, his, hi⟩
refine h ?_ _ hv _ hi
rintro rfl
contradiction
end Sum
section Map
variable [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S)
variable (p)
theorem vars_map : (map f p).vars ⊆ p.vars := by
classical simp [vars_def, Multiset.subset_of_le degrees_map_le]
variable {f}
theorem vars_map_of_injective (hf : Injective f) : (map f p).vars = p.vars := by
simp [vars, degrees_map_of_injective _ hf]
theorem vars_monomial_single (i : σ) {e : ℕ} {r : R} (he : e ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(monomial (Finsupp.single i e) r).vars = {i} := by
rw [vars_monomial hr, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ he]
theorem vars_eq_support_biUnion_support [DecidableEq σ] :
p.vars = p.support.biUnion Finsupp.support := by
ext i
rw [mem_vars, Finset.mem_biUnion]
end Map
end Vars
section EvalVars
/-! ### `vars` and `eval` -/
variable [CommSemiring S]
theorem eval₂Hom_eq_constantCoeff_of_vars (f : R →+* S) {g : σ → S} {p : MvPolynomial σ R}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ p.vars, g i = 0) : eval₂Hom f g p = f (constantCoeff p) := by
conv_lhs => rw [p.as_sum]
simp only [map_sum, eval₂Hom_monomial]
by_cases h0 : constantCoeff p = 0
on_goal 1 =>
rw [h0, f.map_zero, Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro d hd
on_goal 2 =>
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (0 : σ →₀ ℕ)]
· rw [Finsupp.prod_zero_index, mul_one]
rfl
on_goal 1 => intro d hd hd0
on_goal 3 =>
rw [constantCoeff_eq, coeff, ← Ne, ← Finsupp.mem_support_iff] at h0
intro
contradiction
repeat'
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : Finset.Nonempty (Finsupp.support d) := by
rw [constantCoeff_eq, coeff, ← Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff] at h0
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, Finsupp.support_eq_empty]
rintro rfl
contradiction
rw [Finsupp.prod, Finset.prod_eq_zero hi, mul_zero]
rw [hp, zero_pow (Finsupp.mem_support_iff.1 hi)]
rw [mem_vars]
exact ⟨d, hd, hi⟩
theorem aeval_eq_constantCoeff_of_vars [Algebra R S] {g : σ → S} {p : MvPolynomial σ R}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ p.vars, g i = 0) : aeval g p = algebraMap _ _ (constantCoeff p) :=
eval₂Hom_eq_constantCoeff_of_vars _ hp
theorem eval₂Hom_congr' {f₁ f₂ : R →+* S} {g₁ g₂ : σ → S} {p₁ p₂ : MvPolynomial σ R} :
f₁ = f₂ →
(∀ i, i ∈ p₁.vars → i ∈ p₂.vars → g₁ i = g₂ i) →
p₁ = p₂ → eval₂Hom f₁ g₁ p₁ = eval₂Hom f₂ g₂ p₂ := by
rintro rfl h rfl
rw [p₁.as_sum]
simp only [map_sum, eval₂Hom_monomial]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro d hd
congr 1
simp only [Finsupp.prod]
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
intro i hi
have : i ∈ p₁.vars := by
rw [mem_vars]
exact ⟨d, hd, hi⟩
rw [h i this this]
/-- If `f₁` and `f₂` are ring homs out of the polynomial ring and `p₁` and `p₂` are polynomials,
then `f₁ p₁ = f₂ p₂` if `p₁ = p₂` and `f₁` and `f₂` are equal on `R` and on the variables
of `p₁`. -/
theorem hom_congr_vars {f₁ f₂ : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S} {p₁ p₂ : MvPolynomial σ R}
(hC : f₁.comp C = f₂.comp C) (hv : ∀ i, i ∈ p₁.vars → i ∈ p₂.vars → f₁ (X i) = f₂ (X i))
(hp : p₁ = p₂) : f₁ p₁ = f₂ p₂ :=
calc
f₁ p₁ = eval₂Hom (f₁.comp C) (f₁ ∘ X) p₁ := RingHom.congr_fun (by ext <;> simp) _
_ = eval₂Hom (f₂.comp C) (f₂ ∘ X) p₂ := eval₂Hom_congr' hC hv hp
_ = f₂ p₂ := RingHom.congr_fun (by ext <;> simp) _
theorem exists_rename_eq_of_vars_subset_range (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (f : τ → σ) (hfi : Injective f)
(hf : ↑p.vars ⊆ Set.range f) : ∃ q : MvPolynomial τ R, rename f q = p :=
⟨aeval (fun i : σ => Option.elim' 0 X <| partialInv f i) p,
by
show (rename f).toRingHom.comp _ p = RingHom.id _ p
refine hom_congr_vars ?_ ?_ ?_
· ext1
simp [algebraMap_eq]
· intro i hip _
rcases hf hip with ⟨i, rfl⟩
simp [partialInv_left hfi]
· rfl⟩
theorem vars_rename [DecidableEq τ] (f : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(rename f φ).vars ⊆ φ.vars.image f := by
classical
intro i hi
simp only [vars_def, exists_prop, Multiset.mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_image] at hi ⊢
simpa only [Multiset.mem_map] using degrees_rename _ _ hi
theorem mem_vars_rename (f : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) {j : τ} (h : j ∈ (rename f φ).vars) :
∃ i : σ, i ∈ φ.vars ∧ f i = j := by
classical
simpa only [exists_prop, Finset.mem_image] using vars_rename f φ h
lemma aeval_ite_mem_eq_self (q : MvPolynomial σ R) {s : Set σ} (hs : q.vars.toSet ⊆ s)
[∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ s)] :
MvPolynomial.aeval (fun i ↦ if i ∈ s then .X i else 0) q = q := by
rw [MvPolynomial.as_sum q, MvPolynomial.aeval_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun u hu ↦ ?_
rw [MvPolynomial.aeval_monomial, MvPolynomial.monomial_eq]
congr 1
exact Finsupp.prod_congr (fun i hi ↦ by simp [hs ((MvPolynomial.mem_vars _).mpr ⟨u, hu, hi⟩)])
end EvalVars
section Lex
variable [LinearOrder σ]
lemma leadingCoeff_toLex : p.leadingCoeff toLex = p.coeff (ofLex <| p.supDegree toLex) := by
| rw [leadingCoeff]
apply congr_arg p.coeff
apply toLex.injective
rw [Function.rightInverse_invFun toLex.surjective, toLex_ofLex]
lemma supDegree_toLex_C (r : R) : supDegree toLex (C (σ := σ) r) = 0 := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Variables.lean | 327 | 332 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Range
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.MulChar.Basic
/-!
# Quadratic characters on ℤ/nℤ
This file defines some quadratic characters on the rings ℤ/4ℤ and ℤ/8ℤ.
We set them up to be of type `MulChar (ZMod n) ℤ`, where `n` is `4` or `8`.
## Tags
quadratic character, zmod
-/
/-!
### Quadratic characters mod 4 and 8
We define the primitive quadratic characters `χ₄`on `ZMod 4`
and `χ₈`, `χ₈'` on `ZMod 8`.
-/
namespace ZMod
section QuadCharModP
/-- Define the nontrivial quadratic character on `ZMod 4`, `χ₄`.
It corresponds to the extension `ℚ(√-1)/ℚ`. -/
@[simps]
def χ₄ : MulChar (ZMod 4) ℤ where
toFun a :=
match a with
| 0 | 2 => 0
| 1 => 1
| 3 => -1
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by decide
map_nonunit' := by decide
/-- `χ₄` takes values in `{0, 1, -1}` -/
theorem isQuadratic_χ₄ : χ₄.IsQuadratic := by
unfold MulChar.IsQuadratic
decide
/-- The value of `χ₄ n`, for `n : ℕ`, depends only on `n % 4`. -/
theorem χ₄_nat_mod_four (n : ℕ) : χ₄ n = χ₄ (n % 4 : ℕ) := by
rw [← ZMod.natCast_mod n 4]
/-- The value of `χ₄ n`, for `n : ℤ`, depends only on `n % 4`. -/
theorem χ₄_int_mod_four (n : ℤ) : χ₄ n = χ₄ (n % 4 : ℤ) := by
rw [← ZMod.intCast_mod n 4, Nat.cast_ofNat]
/-- An explicit description of `χ₄` on integers / naturals -/
theorem χ₄_int_eq_if_mod_four (n : ℤ) :
| χ₄ n = if n % 2 = 0 then 0 else if n % 4 = 1 then 1 else -1 := by
have help : ∀ m : ℤ, 0 ≤ m → m < 4 → χ₄ m = if m % 2 = 0 then 0 else if m = 1 then 1 else -1 := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/ZModChar.lean | 63 | 64 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Newell Jensen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Newell Jensen
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SpecificGroups.Cyclic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SpecificGroups.Dihedral
/-!
# Klein Four Group
The Klein (Vierergruppe) four-group is a non-cyclic abelian group with four elements, in which
each element is self-inverse and in which composing any two of the three non-identity elements
produces the third one.
## Main definitions
* `IsKleinFour` : A mixin class which states that the group has order four and exponent two.
* `mulEquiv'` : An equivalence between a Klein four-group and a group of exponent two which
preserves the identity is in fact an isomorphism.
* `mulEquiv`: Any two Klein four-groups are isomorphic via any identity preserving equivalence.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein_four-group
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternating_group
## TODO
* Prove an `IsKleinFour` group is isomorphic to the normal subgroup of `alternatingGroup (Fin 4)`
with the permutation cycles `V = {(), (1 2)(3 4), (1 3)(2 4), (1 4)(2 3)}`. This is the kernel
of the surjection of `alternatingGroup (Fin 4)` onto `alternatingGroup (Fin 3) ≃ (ZMod 3)`.
In other words, we have the exact sequence `V → A₄ → A₃`.
* The outer automorphism group of `A₆` is the Klein four-group `V = (ZMod 2) × (ZMod 2)`,
and is related to the outer automorphism of `S₆`. The extra outer automorphism in `A₆`
swaps the 3-cycles (like `(1 2 3)`) with elements of shape `3²` (like `(1 2 3)(4 5 6)`).
## Tags
non-cyclic abelian group
-/
/-! # Klein four-groups as a mixin class -/
/-- An (additive) Klein four-group is an (additive) group of cardinality four and exponent two. -/
class IsAddKleinFour (G : Type*) [AddGroup G] : Prop where
card_four : Nat.card G = 4
exponent_two : AddMonoid.exponent G = 2
/-- A Klein four-group is a group of cardinality four and exponent two. -/
@[to_additive existing IsAddKleinFour]
class IsKleinFour (G : Type*) [Group G] : Prop where
card_four : Nat.card G = 4
exponent_two : Monoid.exponent G = 2
attribute [simp] IsKleinFour.card_four IsKleinFour.exponent_two
IsAddKleinFour.card_four IsAddKleinFour.exponent_two
instance : IsAddKleinFour (ZMod 2 × ZMod 2) where
card_four := by simp
exponent_two := by simp [AddMonoid.exponent_prod]
instance : IsKleinFour (DihedralGroup 2) where
card_four := by simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]; rfl
exponent_two := by simp [DihedralGroup.exponent]
instance {G : Type*} [Group G] [IsKleinFour G] : IsAddKleinFour (Additive G) where
card_four := by rw [← IsKleinFour.card_four (G := G)]; congr!
exponent_two := by simp
instance {G : Type*} [AddGroup G] [IsAddKleinFour G] : IsKleinFour (Multiplicative G) where
card_four := by rw [← IsAddKleinFour.card_four (G := G)]; congr!
exponent_two := by simp
namespace IsKleinFour
/-- This instance is scoped, because it always applies (which makes linting and typeclass inference
potentially *a lot* slower). -/
@[to_additive]
scoped instance instFinite {G : Type*} [Group G] [IsKleinFour G] : Finite G :=
Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero <| by norm_num [IsKleinFour.card_four]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma card_four' {G : Type*} [Group G] [Fintype G] [IsKleinFour G] :
Fintype.card G = 4 :=
Nat.card_eq_fintype_card (α := G).symm ▸ IsKleinFour.card_four
open Finset
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] [IsKleinFour G]
| @[to_additive]
lemma not_isCyclic : ¬IsCyclic G :=
fun h ↦ by simpa using h.exponent_eq_card
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/SpecificGroups/KleinFour.lean | 92 | 94 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.