fix(assets): head-heavy mixed-material hammer + recalibrated nail

#15
by Everloom - opened
assets/local_hammer_nail/board_nail.urdf CHANGED
@@ -6,7 +6,17 @@
6
  (nail_drive). Used for RENDERING only (physics stays MuJoCo in the hybrid
7
  path); the joint must exist so metasim can mirror the nail's slide into the
8
  IsaacSim render each frame. Geometry matches the MJCF (board 0.14x0.14x0.03,
9
- nail shaft r0.003 len0.06 + head r0.009 len0.005, joint origin at board top). -->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10
  <robot name="board_nail">
11
  <link name="board">
12
  <visual>
 
6
  (nail_drive). Used for RENDERING only (physics stays MuJoCo in the hybrid
7
  path); the joint must exist so metasim can mirror the nail's slide into the
8
  IsaacSim render each frame. Geometry matches the MJCF (board 0.14x0.14x0.03,
9
+ nail shaft r0.003 len0.06 + head r0.009 len0.005, joint origin at board top).
10
+
11
+ The <dynamics> values below are INERT: nothing integrates this joint (metasim
12
+ mirrors the nail's MuJoCo slide into the render each frame), so they are stale
13
+ copies of the MJCF's pre-2026-07-29 numbers and are deliberately left alone —
14
+ the generated usd/board_nail.usd was converted from them, and changing one
15
+ without regenerating the other just splits the pair. board_nail.xml is the
16
+ authoritative nail model (now frictionloss=60 plus a stiffened friction
17
+ constraint); URDF has no solreffriction/solimpfriction equivalent at all, so a
18
+ real IsaacSim-*physics* run of this articulation would still show the
19
+ soft-constraint creep the MJCF fixes. Physics stays MuJoCo. -->
20
  <robot name="board_nail">
21
  <link name="board">
22
  <visual>
assets/local_hammer_nail/board_nail.xml CHANGED
@@ -2,23 +2,41 @@
2
  <!-- Board + nail for the hammer_insert_nail task. The nail is NOT a freejoint
3
  body: it hangs off the fixed board by a single vertical SLIDE joint with
4
  dry friction (frictionloss), the standard rigid-body "drive a nail into
5
- wood" trick (Adroit hammer task). Static friction (15 N) holds the nail
6
- against gravity; a hammer strike whose impulse exceeds it slides the nail
7
- down its axis a little — visually "driven in". Because the joint only
8
- translates along z, the nail can NOT be knocked flat, so this is a genuine
9
- vertical-insertion task (vs hammer_drive_peg's knock-flat).
10
 
11
  Modeling notes:
12
  - The nail SHAFT has collision off (contype=0/conaffinity=0): its going
13
  "into the wood" is faked by the slide joint, so it must not fight real
14
  contact with the board. Only the nail HEAD keeps collision — that is the
15
  surface the hammer strikes.
16
- - damping on the joint spreads the drive over several strikes (one blow
17
- does not bottom it out), matching a real hammering rhythm.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18
  - Loaded as ArticulationObjCfg(fix_base_link=True); the root body carries
19
  no pos/quat (set via the cfg default_position), as in desk_lamp.xml.
20
  - Success is read from the nail_drive joint position (insertion depth):
21
- qpos 0 = flush with the start, range floor -0.04 = fully driven. -->
 
22
  <compiler angle="radian"/>
23
  <worldbody>
24
  <body name="board">
@@ -26,7 +44,8 @@
26
  rgba="0.55 0.38 0.22 1" friction="0.9 0.05 0.001" density="500"/>
27
  <body name="nail" pos="0 0 0.03">
28
  <joint name="nail_drive" type="slide" axis="0 0 1" range="-0.04 0"
29
- frictionloss="15" damping="10" armature="0.05"/>
 
30
  <geom name="nail_shaft" type="cylinder" size="0.003 0.03" pos="0 0 0.0"
31
  density="7850" contype="0" conaffinity="0" rgba="0.72 0.72 0.75 1"/>
32
  <geom name="nail_head" type="cylinder" size="0.009 0.0025" pos="0 0 0.032"
 
2
  <!-- Board + nail for the hammer_insert_nail task. The nail is NOT a freejoint
3
  body: it hangs off the fixed board by a single vertical SLIDE joint with
4
  dry friction (frictionloss), the standard rigid-body "drive a nail into
5
+ wood" trick (Adroit hammer task). Static friction (60 N) holds the nail
6
+ against gravity and against being leaned on; a hammer strike whose impulse
7
+ exceeds it slides the nail down its axis a little — visually "driven in".
8
+ Because the joint only translates along z, the nail can NOT be knocked flat,
9
+ so this is a genuine vertical-insertion task (vs hammer_drive_peg's knock-flat).
10
 
11
  Modeling notes:
12
  - The nail SHAFT has collision off (contype=0/conaffinity=0): its going
13
  "into the wood" is faked by the slide joint, so it must not fight real
14
  contact with the board. Only the nail HEAD keeps collision — that is the
15
  surface the hammer strikes.
16
+ - damping on the joint spreads the drive over several strikes (one blow does
17
+ not bottom it out), matching a real hammering rhythm.
18
+ - solreffriction + solimpfriction stiffen the FRICTION constraint, and both
19
+ are load-bearing, not cosmetic. MuJoCo's frictionloss is a SOFT constraint:
20
+ a *sustained* load deforms it by an amount set by the constraint impedance
21
+ and NOT by the frictionloss magnitude, so the nail creeps down with no
22
+ strike at all. solreffriction's timeconst is already at its stability floor
23
+ (2*dt = 0.004 at the family's dt=0.002) and alone left ~5 mm of gravity sag
24
+ and ~30 mm under a 0.665 kg hammer simply laid on the nail head — i.e. past
25
+ the checker's 25 mm gate with no blow struck (measured 2026-07-29, after the
26
+ YCB hammer's head-heavy mass fix put the tool's real weight on the nail).
27
+ solimpfriction hardens it the rest of the way: gravity sag 0.05 mm, a laid-on
28
+ hammer 1.5 mm, a hard 30 N press 6.6 mm. Do NOT loosen either.
29
+ - frictionloss (60 N) is what a strike must beat to slide the nail, so it sets
30
+ the drive per blow. Calibrated against the corrected head-heavy hammer
31
+ (effective striking mass 599 g of 665 g): ~1 mm per 1.0 m/s tap (never
32
+ latches), 6.5 mm per 1.5 m/s swing (latches on blow 4), 12.8 mm per 2.0 m/s
33
+ blow (latches on blow 3). The pre-fix handle-heavy hammer only delivered
34
+ 331 g into the strike, which is why 15 N used to look right.
35
  - Loaded as ArticulationObjCfg(fix_base_link=True); the root body carries
36
  no pos/quat (set via the cfg default_position), as in desk_lamp.xml.
37
  - Success is read from the nail_drive joint position (insertion depth):
38
+ qpos 0 = flush with the start, range floor -0.04 = fully driven; the hammer
39
+ head bottoms out on the board at ~29.6 mm (the nail is then driven flush). -->
40
  <compiler angle="radian"/>
41
  <worldbody>
42
  <body name="board">
 
44
  rgba="0.55 0.38 0.22 1" friction="0.9 0.05 0.001" density="500"/>
45
  <body name="nail" pos="0 0 0.03">
46
  <joint name="nail_drive" type="slide" axis="0 0 1" range="-0.04 0"
47
+ frictionloss="60" damping="10" armature="0.05"
48
+ solreffriction="0.004 1" solimpfriction="0.999 0.9999 0.0001 0.5 2"/>
49
  <geom name="nail_shaft" type="cylinder" size="0.003 0.03" pos="0 0 0.0"
50
  density="7850" contype="0" conaffinity="0" rgba="0.72 0.72 0.75 1"/>
51
  <geom name="nail_head" type="cylinder" size="0.009 0.0025" pos="0 0 0.032"
assets/ycb/hammer/hammer.xml CHANGED
@@ -5,7 +5,12 @@
5
  textured.obj -> trimesh recenter (xy centered on AABB, base at z=0) -> visual mesh
6
  + CoACD convex-decomposed collision (7 parts, threshold=0.04) so the
7
  concave shape is collision-true (cavity preserved / tool silhouette kept).
8
- Density 1840.5 kg/m^3 over the summed part volume 0.000361 m^3 -> mass 0.665 kg.
 
 
 
 
 
9
  Recentered AABB (m): size=[0.1822, 0.3327, 0.0329].
10
  License: YCB CC BY 4.0.
11
  -->
@@ -28,25 +33,25 @@
28
  <geom name="hammer_visual" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_mesh" material="hammer_mat"
29
  group="2" contype="0" conaffinity="0" density="0" />
30
  <geom name="hammer_collision0" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col0"
31
- density="1840.5" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
32
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
33
  <geom name="hammer_collision1" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col1"
34
- density="1840.5" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
35
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
36
  <geom name="hammer_collision2" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col2"
37
- density="1840.5" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
38
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
39
  <geom name="hammer_collision3" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col3"
40
- density="1840.5" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
41
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
42
  <geom name="hammer_collision4" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col4"
43
- density="1840.5" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
44
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
45
  <geom name="hammer_collision5" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col5"
46
- density="1840.5" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
47
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
48
  <geom name="hammer_collision6" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col6"
49
- density="1840.5" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
50
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
51
  </body>
52
  </worldbody>
 
5
  textured.obj -> trimesh recenter (xy centered on AABB, base at z=0) -> visual mesh
6
  + CoACD convex-decomposed collision (7 parts, threshold=0.04) so the
7
  concave shape is collision-true (cavity preserved / tool silhouette kept).
8
+ Mixed-material mass (hammer is a two-material tool; a single density would put the
9
+ centre of mass at the volume centroid): 531 g dense (implied 6663 kg/m^3 over the 79.6 cm^3 the scan texture reads as
10
+ bare metal, vs 7850 for solid steel) + 134 g light (750 kg/m^3 x 179.3 cm^3) -> mass 0.665 kg,
11
+ CoM [-0.0223, 0.089, 0.0166]. Per-geom density is an EFFECTIVE density over the
12
+ convex-hull part volume (361.3 cm^3 vs the scan's 258.9 cm^3), so it
13
+ reads lower than the material it stands for — do not "correct" it back to 7850.
14
  Recentered AABB (m): size=[0.1822, 0.3327, 0.0329].
15
  License: YCB CC BY 4.0.
16
  -->
 
33
  <geom name="hammer_visual" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_mesh" material="hammer_mat"
34
  group="2" contype="0" conaffinity="0" density="0" />
35
  <geom name="hammer_collision0" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col0"
36
+ density="547.4" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
37
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
38
  <geom name="hammer_collision1" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col1"
39
+ density="4717.1" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
40
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
41
  <geom name="hammer_collision2" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col2"
42
+ density="2067.7" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
43
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
44
  <geom name="hammer_collision3" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col3"
45
+ density="4409.4" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
46
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
47
  <geom name="hammer_collision4" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col4"
48
+ density="4717.1" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
49
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
50
  <geom name="hammer_collision5" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col5"
51
+ density="4717.1" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
52
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
53
  <geom name="hammer_collision6" type="mesh" mesh="hammer_col6"
54
+ density="4717.1" friction="2.0 0.1 0.01" solref="0.01 1" priority="2"
55
  group="3" rgba="0 1 0 0" />
56
  </body>
57
  </worldbody>