text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
"::::::::As many illustrious folks once said, ""An apology is the super glue of life. It can repair just about anything"" (Lynn Johnston). Ad rem, what I am attempting to express is that I, one of the many individuals residing in this online community and battleground we call Wikipedia, wish to do just that. I apperceive that too much has gone wrong in my short weeks here. I would like to propose that you and I both are at fault to some degree. We both have broken the rules, one time or another, in our uncontrollable rage. Ab initio, my presence has never been welcomed. As I have come to comprehend that more clearly, I realize that we both must apologize in order for mutual respect and amendment of our differences to thrive. Conclusively, we both have played a part in spawning the havoc of the original incident. Fair enough?
Ex animo, I extend my apologies for the distress, anger, and uneasiness I've unkindly bestowed upon you. Please understand that I did not understand the significance of my actions and I had not fathomed how I should comport myself in such a new unexplored territory. Please accept my apologies, and I hope that we will come to develop a good sense of camaraderie. I will endeavor to start de novo and consign to oblivion any past discombobulating episodes. Please inform me if I err, and God be with you.
Are you proud of me? I made my first edit outside of talk mainspace.
" | 0 |
Yep, it's a shared IP. | 0 |
now im trying to delete the Cape Verdeans in the Netherlands Page and make the French in the Netherlands page france is much closer ( ) | 0 |
"
UAA report
Why did you report ? It's not a violation that I can see, and all you said was it was ""misleading"". // talk // // " | 0 |
" (the so-called ""subjective factor"")" | 0 |
3RR Violation
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. | 0 |
. I'll assume good faith for now but be warned, if you edit in a way that is disruptive to existing articles and not constructive you will be blocked sooner or later you have my word | 0 |
I like the term Eastern Eurasian better than Mongoloid. | 0 |
"
Yes, when I said that Wikipedia was the wrong forum, I meant that Wikipedia was the wrong forum. Wikipedia-mail though is just ordinary email, so that works well. Or we can pick a discussion forum. I just googled for ""economic discussion forum"" and found this: http://www.econpoint.com/forum.php That could work as well. " | 0 |
this article better for deletion cause of no new stories on the page the actor doesnt even work
on his old studio anymore and there where no real stories of the person only TUFF things there are still other better actors that make good stories of there media and really explain their real life | 0 |
":Oh, I thought you wrote the part I pooh-poohed because you messed up the indent. Honestly. Drugs are tested on rich people? WTF? Mark Cartmill is an anatomist isn't he? Anyway, his refutation of ""geographically delimited conspecific populations characterized by distinctive regional phenotypes"" is not at odds with any notions of race I know of. Does this mean race is ""meaningless"", no.
" | 0 |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Brooks, Maine. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. // Talk // Contribs " | 0 |
More advice.
I'd highly recommend reading our plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Among other things, it recommends that you disclose your financial conflict of interest, use drafts, seek other editors' opinions, make sure articles are neutral and well-referenced, and take extra care to write without bias. You're going to be under much greater scrutiny from now on, and I'd suggest you view it as a learning opportunity to make your content even better. There are editors who are available to help you, but you'll have to seek them out through the thicket of those who may make your life difficult in the interest of protecting the encyclopedia. t | c | 0 |
Sorry, NPOV is non-negotiable. And you know that. And you know you're violating it. You are editing in bad faith. | 0 |
"
Jawohl, mein Führer. Yeah like your an expert . You're very opinionated and think pretty highly of yourself. I'm sure you read what I wrote on the talk page. To put it euphemistically that article on anorexia nervosa um.. sucks. I'm going to rewrite the WHOLE thing, with lots of pretty pictures and ""coloured boxes"" and post it all in one shot.
cheers " | 0 |
"
Cream was confirmed like, a week ago. I'm prety sure that G-Mel is the final one. " | 0 |
Ah, I didn't realise the problem was not realising pieces could move back from board B to board A. Now I look at it, I see the article wasn't clear about this. I'll try to edit it further so there can be no mistake. As for the rest: I think there's a general need for more diagrams. The game is, indeed, quite tricky, so it's hardly possible to provide too many for the newcomer. I'll make some more now. See what you think. | 0 |
"
""Corroborating evidence"" is unclear and is in actually just another way of saying ""I don't want this information on the web-page because I am opposed to it."" As I stated before, the information should be on the page, particularly since it is biographical information that the person about whom the biography was written has stated publicly, both in the Google Video and under testimony during Charles Calderon's proposal of the porn tax bill before the California State Assembly. I am not deleting any of your information, but you are deleting mine. If you don't approve of facts that have been stated by an individual - and they are biographical facts - then you may create an entire separate section on Lubben on this webpage. Please refrain from deleting sources and citations. Veritas, Semper " | 0 |
What's up
What's your problem. I am conservative as well. Why do you keep reverting my edits even though I have been in service for over a decade? Don't bother to reply. I won't read it, and I won't revert your edits, as I have mutual respect for another. Sincerely, | 0 |
"
Most of the last edit seems to belong to the talk page rather than in the article, so I have moved it so I can be discussed.
Broader context
Use of the term ""psychoanalytic theory"" implies that there is a core theory which is complete by itself. This view is not common even among practicing analysts, who in large part recognise that the mind is a function of the brain, so that any full theory of the psyche needs to refer to the brain. An excellent review of this is Kandel ER (1999) ""Biology and the future of psychoanalysis"", Am.J.Psychiat 156:505.
Psychoanalytic thinking is inseparably bound also to clinical treatment of patients. Some purists claim that achieving insight is the only goal of psychoanalysis; but health insurers generally require more concrete goals such as reduced mental illness or increased time at work. Both of these clinical perspectives assume that the effect on actual patients is important so they should be included in this article. An excellent review of the clinical benefits of psychoanalysis is Fonagy, Roth & Higgitt (2005), Bull.Menninger Clinic 69(1):1-58.
This article would not be complete without consideration of substantial attacks on psychoanalysis and its theory, which have reshaped psychiatric practice in the UK and USA over the past 20-30 years. These attacks can be classified as empirical (Gabbard, Gunderson & Fonagy 2002); financial (Detre & McDonald 1997); theoretical (Meehl 1998 calculates that there are many psychoanalytical explanations possible for any single clinical problem); and circumstantial (e.g. past failures with respect to homosexuality and childhood abuse, and the antipathy of many analysts to quantitative research: Gabbard, Gunderson & Fonagy 2002).
Psychoanalytic theorists may have over-reached themselves in attempting to account for all troublesome psychic phenomena. However, their concerted efforts to address more circumscribed areas have produced widely acknowledged, influential advances in the areas of defense mechanisms, attachment, the unconscious, transference and counter-transference, and the treatment of borderline personalities, among others. Each of these advances has been accompanied by individual theories.
Suggestions for the peer-review
The article should not require a paragraph to describe what it is about; instead, its scope should simply be theories to do with psychoanalysis. It should include subsections on the question of whether (and how) psychoanalysis can be studied objectively, whether it is disproveable in whole or part (and whether this matters), the informal ""theory"" of the manners in which analysis can be conducted (e.g. bare room unlike Freud; methods of interpretation), and the relationships with behavioural, cognitive, and psychiatric theories. It would be useful to have an explanation of why psychoanalysis has resisted decline so much more successfully in France than in anglophone countries. Rather than complicated sentences with complicated words, we should be treated to simple descriptions of the differences between Freudian, Jungian, and Adlerian thinking. Possibly in lists if that helps to simplify the sentences." | 0 |
You assume I care. Stop spamming M'era Luna links. - 22:14, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
" I respect your rationale,but if a topic is so talked about and has references whats the need for a wiki entry. I need to rethink using wiki at all, if not contributing to it (cause its not better than google search for consolidation of information) —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)
" | 0 |
deleted entry
Hi Kurykh- I'm a reporter with the Allentown Morning Call hoping to interview you for a story about a deleted Wikipedia entry. Can I e-mail you somewhere so we can correspond today? Thanks. | 0 |
"
undent WLU, I am proposing that the page speak neutrally about BHRT, the hormones and the treatment. Currently there is no information about some aspects of BHRT treatment on the page, such as the use of testosterone, DHEA, and who knows what else as part of the compounded products. Also, no mention of biest and triest, the original compounds. This article should first be ""encyclopedic"", and as such needs to explain what the treatment is. As the page currently is, there is little indication for the reader to know what is being criticized, except for the fragmented claims for BHRT which are strewn throughout the article. " | 0 |
Thank you for experimenting with the page Nintendo NSider Forums on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | 0 |
I simply redirected, there was nothing to be saved. | 0 |
notices are for the people who created the article, not the decliners of a speedy deletion. The page is a perfectly good candidate for speedy deletion as a test page (due to the way editnotices work); however, it was not a redirect, and thus it didn't fall under the R2 criterion. Have a good one too! Talk Contributions | 0 |
"
The infamous block
Veritas: do not get Wikinoid yet. The policy is on my side: it was a totally unjust block and I am appealing. I still trust Wikipedia. I don't trust so much certain wikipedians and administrators but I have faith that in the end truth, justice and NPOV shall prevail. If not in the ANI, where admins seem to behave like a wolfpack, at least in first instance, in ArbCom. Policy is very clear and Shell Kinney simply broke all rules.
In my appeal I also ask for Shell to be recused from further cases against me or related to the controversial article due to bias and misuse of admin privileges.
I won't go back to that article at least in a looooong while. I've reached my personal limit with it and after all non-existent races are not my primary interest. I believe though that all this conflict will help to raise awareness about what is going on in that battlefield... (oops! article) and specially about Thulean's wikilawyerist attitude. Besides it may also raise awareness about misuse of policy by certain admins that never admit any error nor fulfill their duties.
Ironically Shell Kinney is running for ArbCom herself. Guess that her campaign is something like ""Wikipedia needs an iron man and that's me"" of Thatcher. I don't know. I'm voting a more promising candidate.
Enjoy, " | 0 |
The Capital Hill Blue only covers unmentioned stories, and it's not a tabloid newsprint, like The National Enquirer, at all. | 0 |
Prayer of The Heart
Have made an edit to the introduction explaining - according to St Theophan's teaching - that the Jesus Prayer and the Prayer of the Heart are not synonymous but the Jesus prayer can bring about Prayer of the Heart. 81.106.115.153 | 0 |
All this is Very Unfair. | 0 |
"
I think that what you are doing is responding to two move request discussions, which is great. The problem is that you have repeatedly move-warred and repeatedly refused to request any of the moves you seek, and you protest heatedly against requests to do so. (talk) • (contribs) " | 0 |
Importen material for the articel
Director of the International Crisis Group in Serbia-Montenegro, James Lion, said that if Montenegro wants to enter the European Union in a shorter period of time, it should do so without Serbia.
The Montenegrin Police Administration has accused Predrag Bulatovic and his supporters of cursing at and insulting police officers who were working as security at the promotional conference of the supporters of the preservation of the federal union of Serbia-Montenegro held in Mojkovac yesterday. | 0 |
Sango123? another question
I went to the pages you requested, but I still don't know how to get to the newbie person's talk page. Help? sorry for all the questions, | 0 |
Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Offspringheadaroundyoucover.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Offspringheadaroundyoucover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. | 0 |
You do the same, with what other people you relate them?. It was to prove that Dorians who came from the Epir were in reality a Pelasgic group and other Pelasgic group lived in pocket inside Greece so they were not Greek . At “Homer, Herodotus, and Thucydides, and were said to have inhabited various areas, such as Thrace, Argos, Crete, and Chalcidice. In the 5th century BC the surviving villages apparently preserved a common non-Greek language.” www.britannica.com/eb/article-9058989/Pelasgi.Dodona | 0 |
")
(Talk if you want) Okay, KDB! Thank you for your kind help so far! I just had one sincere curiosity though, and I invite you to answer that because I think you can, How in the wiki does one become ""administrator""? Does wikipedia have ""employment council"", Placements and stuff for appointing someone as administrator? or, Is there some other way like ""elections""? (No pun Intended" | 0 |
hey
IM not vandalize in here
because Kubigula.
is delete my work for no reason after i did request dont
delete my work
IM am really angry with Kubigula
IM not Vandalize in here.
please trust me
from aiden2009 | 0 |
Thanks
Thanks. Could use your help here and there. Also note that the Bahais are using sundry wiki articles for gratuitous self-promotion. Maitreya is one. | 0 |
ITS A DRAFT I PUT THAT IN AS A PLACEHOLDER FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF | 0 |
HI
you say that im being a meanie or whatever. I dont see how? | 0 |
"
No extra autonomy given Canada 1867
Referenced sources given in response to request for citations clearly indicate that no extra autonomy was passed from Britain to Canada. Some editors deny this.
Forsey
""By the time of Confederation in 1867, this system had been operating in most of what is now central and eastern Canada for almost 20 years. The Fathers of Confederation simply continued the system they knew, the system that was already working, and working well.""
The system Forsey is referring to is [responsible government] which was attained in the 1840s. Fathers of Confederation adopted the same system. Some powers already assumed by Legislative Assembly were passed to the federal level of government. No new powers came from Britain.
Heard
At its inception in 1867, Canada's colonial status was marked by political and legal subjugation to British Imperial supremacy in all aspects of government - legislative, judicial, and executive. The Imperial Parliament at Westminster could legislate on any matter to do with Canada and could override any local legislation, the final court of appeal for Canadian litigation lay with the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London, the Governor General had a substantive role as a representative of the British government, and ultimate executive power was vested in the British Monarch - who was advised only by British Ministers in its exercise. Canada's independence came about as each of these subordinations was eventually removed.
What part of ""colonial status"" and ""political and legal subjugation to British Imperial supremacy in all aspects of government"" is ambiguous? Where is the ""dominion status"" here? ""Dominion"" clearly implied subjugation to the Imperial government in 1867.
((reflist}}" | 0 |
Photos
Seven of the eight main photos pertain to events in or concerning the United States and Americans. Anyone else think this is disproportionate? | 0 |
Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2016
Please change Amelia Baggs to Amanda Baggs as there is are reliable sources to confirm her name change from Amanda to Amelia. The page itself was moved back some time ago. | 0 |
No way merging with Windows article.
Although its a stub, it can be expanded. This is a distinct network topic, there's no question of it being merged with a general article on Windows. | 0 |
It's been discussed at the top of this talk page. | 0 |
the article had no references as per WP:VERIFY and WP:RS, i could not find any mention of the person anywhere on google. | 0 |
"::::Hi. Can you please re-assess ""I Miss You (Beyoncé Knowles song)""? • Talk2Me
" | 0 |
If I had known that you would read and archive my post within a matter of minutes, I would not have posted other copies. I honestly thought they were lost in the posting process.
You do not otherwise wish to respond to my request? | 0 |
You seem to be only contacting people located in Houston. Why is that? So they can stand on your side? | 0 |
Listen to them...
...children of the night. What music they make. 62.216.118.84
Hihihihi... 62.216.118.84
I'm unstoppable! Superhuman ich bin! Nih. 62.216.118.84 | 0 |
"
Interesting...not quite the route I would have taken re: shuffling, but I like it. T • @ • C " | 0 |
"
Unfair, Unbalanced, and Non-neutral VERSION 2 - TWO MUCH ACCENT ON ""DE FACTO""
What ""de facto""? This region has little time to live, its time has passed. " | 0 |
"
US R&B; Songs
For clarity, there is a page at WP:USCHARTS which explains how to use Billboard Charts. Per that article, Hot R&B; Songs and Hot Rap Songs are 25-song charts which are distillations (a.k.a component charts) of the Hot R&B;/Hip-Hop Songs chart. — [talk] " | 0 |
Your userboxes
I've removed two of your userboxes which claim, apparently falsely, that 1) you are female and that 2) you serve in the British Army. 67.170.87.223
Per your reversion, will you kindly address this inquiry.67.170.87.223 | 0 |
"==Image source problem with Image:Visuel2.jpg==
Thanks for uploading Image:Visuel2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (Talk, ) " | 0 |
", 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Actually, if you read my comment on the ""XL"" section above, I favor removing most of those trivia points, including that one. (Talk) 23:09" | 0 |
"
i suyppose the concept of ""star-crossed lovers"" is vague to you if you havne't read Shakespeare lately " | 0 |
Hello
Please see the Justin Bieber talk page to discuss the matter. Do not go to my talk page to intimidate me. Be civil. CG | 0 |
"
Evans Lake (British Columbia)
I have boldly removed your speedy delete tag. Please see edit history and article talk page. Thhanks. '''Cheers, ) Dlohcierekim''' " | 0 |
Please do not accuse me of being a vandal as that is something I am obviously not. Please try to be civil, I appreciate that you've now started a talk page discussion on the matter, as I requested you to do, instead of reverting without a summary Thank you.
How would you name someone whou would remove content while referring to a non-existent sectiuon of the article, after he had been told that no such section does exist? Thank you. ja_62 | 0 |
Oops forgot my tildes | 0 |
"*:well... now that I look at the article more closely I can at least see where this movereq is coming from, and it's not as tendentious as I thought. This article is a mess... I still don't support renaming it though, as the ""provide a worldwide view"" within this article is a mistake. As I mentioned above there are plenty of articles that can and should provide a worldwide view of Gun control issues, but the subject of this article is a US centric subject and should be re-factored in order to be presented as such. Rather then worrying about the name just get to work copy editing the article.
You seem to be arguing that there should be an article split, one article for the global and a split out article for the USA centric views. Right? If so, the problem still remains that the title of the global half of the split should have a global viewpoint. And, the ""keep and"" portion of the article title (taken from the US Bill of Rights) is decidedly USA centric. Explain how ""keep and"" is global.
Or perhaps the article could take an approach as describing purely the concept of RKBA, and maybe the cultures and/nations where it exists, and other subjects as necessary (although I suspect the same debates will come up in those areas). Perhaps altering the general approach and method of the article could be an alternative to renaming/moving it. I'd be willing to give it a shot if everyone else would. " | 0 |
The Reference Desk is probably the place you want
Hello! welcome to Wikipedia! If you'd like to ask a question, you can do so at the Wikipedia reference desk, which is a better place than creating an article containing your question. | 0 |
Why?
Why did u delete Roberto De Niroes (spanish) thats valid info | 0 |
germany took over most of it and | 0 |
Edit to ISOC (Islamic Society) - your own article
{{blank]} | 0 |
Edit Wars Warning
I have clearly declared my thesis in talk page, I do not receive any response even I ve directed the user reverting my contrb. to talk page section. It is not an edit war, I am trying to solve a NPOV issue. OnlyTheTruth | 0 |
) 86.22.33.61
As above 19:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC | 0 |
The inappropriate caption to the photo was added unilaterally and without any discussion. I herewith revert the changes, with the ff rationale: THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT TWINK (GAY SLANG), AND NOT CORRIGAN'S CAREER ACHIEVEMENTS.72.68.115.204 | 0 |
Not enough edits for Angela
Unfortunately we never even dove into the consolation prizes. 50,000 edits wow thats impressive someone is a little preoccupied. So fo playing so hard but giving so little you will be given an official barn award the sequel. Sorry but we accept winners not losers try harder to be a winner not a loser. Sorry but red links don't give happiness they take away. | 0 |
, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
But it is right for differential ECL where the emitter voltage is really fixed, isn't it? 21:36 | 0 |
. Most ethnic groups have problems assimilating, however, well documented Danish intolerance makes it virtually impossible. If we are to document these issues in detail, the facts must be known | 0 |
"
I did not set that the proportion justifies any killing. I am just interested in accentuate that for the whole WW II and every result of the hell in first palace responsible is Nazi Germany. There was no organized killing like concentrations lagers for civilians with purpose to murder etc at the time of expulsion. Also there would not be mob revenges and criminal activity out of government control. To clarify, even 3 years after war the government and country organization was very limited. Many people were demoralized by war and easily ready to revenge. When you take for consideration that every one of fifth Polish citizen was killed you can imagine how many people can be at end of his tether. Now I hear some impersonal blames without actual proofs. Uncertainly numbers of deaths and uncertain reasons of those. Feely it is juggle with numbers and accusations.
With accusation you must be very specific. I understand and accepted the consideration about what happen, but be specific. Be very specific, and do not forget that ""first thing must be put first"". The story is regarding nations rather then individuals. In this case you judge Polish people etc. versus German people. One can picture a hell for innocents and compare it with crime against humanity. However imagine how can feel an individual in proportional situation. He was attacked, bitten almost killed. He lost his eye and arm. And now his neighbor says: the other guy lost his finger and got serious blow into his nose so you are equal.
The guy says, but I was attacked and I lost his arm and my eye. Never mine the neighbor says: this is a crime to hit somebody. _ I know that it is somewhat strange to compare nation to individuals, but for member of nation which lost so much is no acceptable to say about subject ""B"" arrogantly forgetting about the subject ""A"". Simplifying you can not separate result from cause. This why I protest. Intentional or not the action can be considered as magnification a part of object which is indivisible. AS> " | 0 |
"
The true censorship is coming from that tiny, vocal and politicised minority who wish to remove the term from the language. coll " | 0 |
Done, Side effects section added. | 0 |
Who's Cool?
Nathaniel's cool. Great stuff you put together. Sorry i couldn't help out more. Don't forget to visit the new shop Jan1. CNC Centrump, Clausing Coulchester and TIG up the wazo. Erin | 0 |
"
Mentioning it on the page isn't going to happen without a reliable source covering it. Why? Original research. If you start interpreting the site, and explaining things on it, with no reliable source to back you up, then it's OR. You cannot explain the treasure hunt, because there would be no way to verify it took place. Wiki isn't a how-to guide, so you can't post passwords and the lot so that people can play the game themselves. We need reliable coverage of the event. Someone will talk about it eventually. This isn't a scooper site; we don't have to be update by the minute. (Contact me)
" | 0 |
Politically it can be argued that the UK government strongly supports the construction of wind farms projects to the detriment of much better alternatives. The underlying reason for this is to protect the treasury from potential large losses in tax revenue. Significantly, alternatives such as energy efficiency initiatives, home based micro-generation and solar thermal power installations would reduce VAT revenue from energy bills. Moreover, these alternatives would cause considerable loss in tax revenue from the profits of energy supply companies that correspond to the reduced amount of energy these companies would
otherwise supply. | 0 |
Just wanted to change the red into blue.
Feel free to talk to me here. | 0 |
merge as per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/RulesStandards. Our intent is not to delete anyone's work or to minimize the importance of any article that already exists on the Wikipedia. Instead our goal is to tighten the information, to make it more relevant and useful for the general Wikipedian. This article will be absorbed in its entirety to the larger state Scouting article. The newer article will encompass OA lodges, Councils, early nonBSA Scouting organizations like Campfire or Woodcraft, Girl Scouting where applicable, and other ideas as they come up. | 0 |
Thats from a speech by LK Advani. Not NPOV at all, and not a reliable source. 05:06, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
"
BARB URLs
All the BARB sources for viewing figures seem to have the second half cut off. Anyone know what the exact URLs should be?
Cheers, propaganda " | 0 |
IIRC the ar format was chosen simply because it was sufficient and simpler to implement in dpkg ) 10:42, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
"
In the News
In Culver City, Calif., Art and Food Turn a Nowhere Into a Somewhere By JANELLE BROWN (print version) NY Times. Verse " | 0 |
"Bio: Jibran Mangi born on march 3, 1995 & he is new face on social media.
JM Said: Your birth may be normal, but your death should be History, like all, trust few, follow none, but learn from everyone..!! Never change your ""originality"" for the sake of others, because you are the best no mater what colour or race u belong to!
Love, Peace, Harmony, Tolerance, Equality & Brotherhood really HELPS!..I'm friendly & greatfull to those who respect me!, Ignore the hate, accept the love, GIVE & TAKE...Ya Ali (a.s) Madad!" | 0 |
MacKenzie McHale
Your edit on MacKenzie McHale has been reverted as unconstructive. The content has been used as a prank recently but this edit was simply out of place and with no context. When the article is expanded it could mention the particular plot event you edited into the stub, but right now there is no reason to add that. | 0 |
is what he's been, just frankly speaking...accusing me of what he has BLATANTLY done himself!! | 0 |
"
Regarding edits made during August 9 2006 (UTC) to Episodes of Lost (season 3)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (Talk | Contribs) " | 0 |
"
some advice
hi Hboetes. You are new here and you don't understand the rules very well, much less the spirit that informs them - it is very very unwise to jump straight into a heated dispute as you are doing on the Michael Greger article. Per the notice above you are edit warring, and if you continue doing that you are going to drive right over a cliff and get blocked. So really my advice to you is slow down and learn how we operate (and really learn!). Ask questions about the relevant wikipedia policies and guidelines that govern our content.
I am sorry about this, but if you really want to get involved, it turns out that Wikipedia is a pretty complex place. Being an ""encyclopedia that anyone can edit"" means that over the years, Wikipedia has developed lots of policies and guidelines (PAG) to help provide a ""body of law"" as it were, that form a foundation for rational discussion. Without that foundation, this place would be a wild west - a truly ugly place, where people would just make shit up, about why some content should or should not be in an article, and it would devolve into a bar room brawl. But with the foundation, there are ways to rationally work things out - if, and only if, all the parties involved accept that foundation and work within it. One of the hardest things for new people, is to understand not only that this foundation exists, but what its letter and spirit is. (I keep emphasizing the spirit, because too often people fall prey to what we call ""wikilawyering"") The more I have learned about how things are set up here - not just the letter of PAG and the various drama boards and administrative tools, but their spirit - the more impressed I have become at how, well ... beautiful this place is. It takes time to learn both the spirit and the letter of PAG, and to really get aligned with Wikipedia's mission to crowdsource a reliable, NPOV source of information for the public (as ""reliable"" and ""NPOV"" are defined in PAG!). People come edit for many reasons, but one of the main ones is that they are passionate about something. That passion is a double-edged sword. It drives people to contribute which has the potential for productive construction, but it can also lead to WP:TENDENTIOUS editing, which is really destructive. WP:ADVOCACY is one of our biggest bedevilments.
So don't edit war - discuss on the talk page. Ask authentic questions, not rhetorical ones, about what policies and guidelines are relevant to the content you care about. good luck. " | 0 |
"
Problems with article
I really don't think that the words ""bloody supression"" belong to an article. Also the claims of a spy ring should remain an allegation, as it was never proven. " | 0 |
This and Democratic Kampuchea should be merged, but Khmer Rouge should have it's own article. | 0 |
They are deletionists. | 0 |
"create an account]] and log in 'Due to persistent vandalism (), anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.
If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. Or you may use the form here. An account will be created for you. Please check on [ this list] that the username you choose has not already been taken.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|" | 0 |
"
When you say ""sorcery"", does it really mean ""Magic Tricks""? 202.156.9.3 " | 0 |
How is it this person won't leave me alone and I repeatedly ask to be left alone and I get blocked? She's stalking me and won't get off my page. Is she blocked? | 0 |
Agreed. The national statistics will be removed since they use completely uncomparable methodologies/definitions from different statistics agencies in different countries. I moved the ILO list to the top since the UN data unfortunately excludes many Asian countries like China or Japan and is less comprehensive than the ILO list. Also note that the UN is not a labour focused organization - The ILO is by far the most authoritative and relevant organization we have on this article. | 0 |
Give me and hour and I'll see the refs in the previously said sections turn blue. • (Click here to collect your price!) | 0 |
I concur with Mr. Geist. The long-standing version more accurately reflects the structure of the film and is far more aesthetically elegant. No compelling case has been made for changing it. And it's unimpressive to call out others for reverting when you're doing exactly the same thing yourself, M. TRTX. | 0 |
someting random
MMMMMMM yes........ | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.