text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
Whoa there
Do you think I actually care what you have to say? Go play out your powertrip on someone else. | 0 |
If by some kind of IDIOCY editing Chris Ferguson's page to include the fact that Christ is NOT an atheist is seen as an insignificant edit, then I deserve to live too. 76.88.36.113 | 0 |
Please leave
You have been abusing your right as an administrator when one writes something that you disagree with. It's about them you step now. | 0 |
"
I am still waiting to hear from the other parties active on this page. (Talk) " | 0 |
And it was a perfectly valid question as Brad has this habit of turning up, waving his wand and then disappearing without trace. This block is punitive and pointless. | 0 |
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedily deleted because the content is not copied from another source. Everything that is copied is quoted and cited with the references at the bottom. I am creating this page because there isn't a page for Joachim Pissarro and there should be, | 0 |
well no we can't drop it. the fear-of-conspiracy-theme is a very important part of RR and it comes straight out of the 1770s, as Wood, Davis and others say. | 0 |
You keep on sending me messages saying that I am disruptive, I am not sure what I have done, could you please explain that, and in advance if I have done anything wrong- sorry.
122.106.27.175 | 0 |
Anything intended to bring Wikipedia to a more ideal state is a contribution. The value of Wikipedia is not judged by total word count. | 0 |
"
So how long will it take this time until someone says ""Janet Dayton is (insert name)""? 16:03 Apr 30, 2003 (UTC)" | 0 |
, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Quoting you: . The article references two independent reviewers. Citations that reference the publisher are merely items of pure fact, such as this one:
…or citing a number like how there are 149,000 parts in the tool library. Anything that is descriptive as to how it works is cited to the published reviews. 15:13 | 0 |
stop changing nyanpire into a boy and leave my episodes. And then i'll stop.
WHY DO YOU KEEP BULLYING ME!? | 0 |
Thanks for the advice. I am seriously attempting to focus, as you suggest, on establishing consensus in the discussion on the talk page. However, I have yet to see any formal reason as to why the section in question is not encyclopedic. Is the onus on me and other editors to prove the section is encyclopedic or on others to show why it is not ? I guess I will have to go read the guidelines on this and reckon we will not arrive at consensus (given people's statements thus far) and either I will be snowballed or this will go into an escalated dispute. | 0 |
I'll add the link to the top of this page. | 0 |
also deserve to get blocked. | 0 |
It honestly seems like Christgau is simply trolling Radiohead material, and various other Alternative Rock musicians too. He is constantly giving out 1 star ratings, and his reviews are, to be honest, very amateurish. I highly suggest removing his reviews from not just this article, but all Wikipedia articles. Unless wikipedia considers any person on the Internet as a viable source. | 0 |
"
Intro needs urgent fixing
The last two sentences in the intro need rewording/or a strong citation:
""The situation surrounding his assasination continues to be murky, while he reportedly was assasinated by Nation of Islam officials, he also had many enemies in the United States government. It is widely believed that the government also had a role in the assasination.""
I am no expert on the man but I have checked several reliable sources (E.g. ""Malcolm X"" Encyclopedia Britannica. 1990 Ed.) and they don't say anything about a government role. I am not saying that the viewpoint is untenable, but I don't think 'widely believed' is correct.
If someone more knowledgeable on the subject doesn't do it in the next day or so then I will (I am hesitant to leap in as I imagine that this article can be controversial).
Also, it's spelt Assassination (unless us Aussies are out of step with the rest of the world on that one – happens occasionally.)
" | 0 |
"
I've said what to many people? What about answering the question I asked just above your evasive reply? Corbett " | 0 |
"
I’m guessing you did not read Pratchett? Rgds hugarheimur " | 0 |
"
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. talk
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices." | 0 |
The School is Beths Grammar School and I am currently trying to retrieve the book from the library as to attain these details for you, also I you post at 11.04 this morning claiming to no sources provided, some of us have school to go to, you obviously currently have nothing better to do. ) | 0 |
I did. I believe that you are in the wrong, and that more (non-pagan) admin eyes will agree with Jossi. I'm signing on to the mediation. (Talk) | 0 |
I would agree with WWGB, it is there to make it clear that they are related airlines but not actually the same operator. | 0 |
my your mood be as the weather.
you remember me? probably say no, no problem, i'll make you clear. | 0 |
"CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address has been used abusively;the address has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse.
If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please post on your talk page, with a notereferencing this message. Please be sure to include the IP address (which should appear at the bottom of the block message). Administrators should not undo any block that is specifically called a ""Checkuser"" block. Period. The Checkuser knows something that you don't. If the unblock template goes up you need to ask the Checkuser why the block is there. The Checkuser might not tell you, but they will review the situation and decide whether the block can be lifted. It may not be obvious why that block is in place, but there is a reason.[2] (see: block log • current autoblocks)" | 0 |
The sentence is OK for Latin America and the Canary Islands. | 0 |
"==regarding reverting of edit by Wiki guy752==
To the best of my knowledge, lightening is correct.
There is no such thing as ""digital lighting"". It's still lighting. Digital would only describe that the lighting is controlled digitally. This has absolutely no effect on the actual light and thus no effect on the image.
If I'm not mistaken, lightening would refer to processing to increase the brightness of shadows, which increases the noise as both noise and the signal is boosted (signal to noise ratio remains the same). I'm not sure if there could be a better word than ""lightening"" though. Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to explain where the original noise in the shadow comes from, and I'm not sure if this could be consider a ""true"" noise source as it looks like its simply boosting already present noise.
Unless if there another meaning for shadow noise?
202.156.11.10 " | 0 |
Pretty sure Aristotle predated Linneaus... aren't names prior to Systema Natura considered ineligible? I know the ICZN itself does not cover anything above the Family group but I've never seen a name cited to any author pre-dating the 18th century. | 0 |
"
Scotty, I don't want to see you leave either, but what you said (about ""my entire existence"") belittles my contributions in an unacceptable manner. I got fucking blocked for responding to your sneer, so eating some crow on your part is no more than fair, it seems to me. " | 0 |
" chauvin-0 This user chooses not to listen to ultra-nationalist rhetoric, of whatever nation.
" | 0 |
"
@POD. Maybe you are right. Okay, you win. I quit. I should be satisfied that the ""world's leading authority"" on the Maya, David Stuart included in his recent book mention of the ""galactic alignment"". This is the ""ASTROLOGICAL"" phrase I coined when first discussing the ""apparent"" alignment of the solstices with the galactic equator midway between the Harmonic Convergence in 1987 and 2012. Having so many people even consider for a moment that these two events belong in a ""galactic"" context is a job well done. Maybe, just maybe, if John Major Jenkins ever actually comes to understand this ""advanced astrological perspective"" he can explain it to everyone else on TV. Then maybe, just maybe, Wikipedia will get it right. Hahhahhahahahhahhahahahahhahahahahahaha. ~*~ Mardyks ~" | 0 |
And Jess and Mallexkion, yes I understand it not conclusive evidence, but you must understand its suggestive evidence, and our readers have a right to know about it and make up their own minds! | 0 |
Poyning or Poynings?
It is absolutely and without a doubt Sir Edward Poynings. See the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography entry by Steven G. Ellis, ‘Poynings, Sir Edward (1459–1521)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 accessed 2 March 2008. As such, the law 10 Henry VII c. 9 should be, and generally is, described as Poynings' law. For examples see, R. D. Edwards and T. W. Moody, 'The history of Poynings' law, part I, 1494-1615', Irish Historical Studies, II (1940-41): 415-16 or C. I. McGrath The Making of the Eighteenth-Century Irish Constitution. Government, Parliament and the Revenue, 1692-1714 (Dublin, 2000). That said, it is listed as Poynings's law in the index of David Dickson, New Foundations: Ireland 1660-1800 (Dublin, 1987), 246. | 0 |
"
""filthy"" has to be removed " | 0 |
POV = Point of View -Carl | 0 |
From the Sandbox...
Ger a load of this: Look at the left side. | 0 |
"
LawrenceOfPersia, please stop and discuss your edits. And please read the policies and guidelines linked. We are writing an encyclopedia here, not a linkfarm. Maybe you can help Wikipedia with actually uploading images .. T C " | 0 |
"
Thanks [[, you're right, sorry, I am indeed using the 2002 edition I was looking at the page listing all the editions and it looked like 1980 was the final edition. The 2002 is ISBN 0 300 09733 6. (talk) " | 0 |
"
Haha LOL. Well... But this girl.... Have a look at this. Hasn't she got the most beautiful lips and skin!! She's amazing! White cat " | 0 |
", 7 April 2010 (UTC)
I changed your edit to bring the link outside the ""ref"" tag to make it more visible. Soap— 00:43" | 0 |
Doctorisin, I too share your sentiments and have raised this issue as well. Regarding science rewrite I too agree a rewrite is in order and we should use the CCGPP sources as it provides the most comprehensive, evidence based review of scientific literature as it pertains to chiropractic clinical practice on UE, spinal, LE and non-NMS conditions.
http://www.ccgpp.org/lowbackliterature.pdf
http://www.ccgpp.org/upperextremity.pdf
http://www.ccgpp.org/2.pdf
http://www.ccgpp.org/softtissue.pdf
If someone can find a more comprehensive source and a review of chiropractic literature they should present it, otherwise these documents should suffice as the work has already been done for us. | 0 |
"
Weight
""The largest known species reached weights of 6 to 8 tons while exceptionally large males may have exceeded 12 tons."" I was intending to add a conversion table to this, but there is a lot of difference in the definition of a ton in different countries, and it's unclear what the author actually meant. Does anyone know what the estimated weight was in kilograms, so I can put in a table to clarfy for readers from different countries? " | 0 |
It'll be a few days before I can devote the time required to dig into this. Meantime it sounds like you should tag Capital Partners with . — | 0 |
I'm Portuguese. I Speak Portuguese. I Speak Galician. And it is in fact the same language. Altought numorous castilian words and castilian influence is present in galician.
Another error:
Portugal declared independence from Kingdom of Leon in 23 of June 1128.
Portugal was independent when the Count of Portugal turned to be the king of Portugal - the year was 1139 (Till today there are many countries that are independent and have a prince, for example, as the head of State.)
The king of Leon and Castille recognized Portugal as an independent country in 1143.
The pope recognized Portugal as a full independent and cristian nation in 1179.
So, declaration of Independence: 1128 Recognition: 1143
1139 and 1179 ?!?!?!?!?!?! What?????????????? Never even eard of that dates, not even at history classes! Only when reading some history books. | 0 |
in 1912, and only rescided (partially) that recognition in 1915 | 0 |
How long am I blocked for now? | 0 |
"
There is mistakes on this page ""Ад сэрца"" is not ""Hell 0f the heart"". Ад is hell in russian language , but it's not in belarussian. Hell in belarussian is pekla.""Ad"" is only a preposition like from . I don't know English so good to translate properly. Right translation is something like ""From the heart""." | 0 |
Also, look in any up to date history book, and it will confirm that it happened. | 0 |
"
I was looking at the US Airways 2006 annual report (it's 10-K form) and the lengthy company description lists Las Vegas as a secondary hub (like Pittsburgh), not a primary hub. The link for the annual report is http://library.corporate-ir.net/library/19/196/196799/items/192379/Annual%20Report%202005.pdf and the appropriate quote is found on page 20 of the .pdf file. The quote is ""The Company has primary hubs in Charlotte, Philadelphia and Phoenix and secondary hubs/focus cities in Pittsburgh, Las Vegas, New York, Washington, D.C. and Boston."" I made this change on the article page." | 0 |
got me an orange bar ;) | 0 |
Resume marketing services
It's a smart thought to take the time to compose a custom resume that particularly highlights the experience you have that is important to the occupation for which you're applying.
It certainly takes more opportunity to alter your resume, in any case, it's justified regardless of the exertion, particularly when applying for employments that are an impeccable match for your capabilities and experience.
To redo your resume, alter your resume so your abilities and experience are as close a match as could be allowed to the expected set of responsibilities or occupation promotion prerequisites. | 0 |
"
You'll have to my talk page if you want to continue it. But just look at something you wrote; The Bible itself even claims hundreds of times that what it says is true. 1. You wrote CLAIMS. Claims means to assert to be true without really even being proof. The bible should not claim anything is ture. It should assure us that stuff is true. 2. Of course if I wrote something I wanted you to believe, I would tell you it's true a couple of times or here's a better idea. I'll write everything and tell you and go 'oh by the way, I'm making this all up as I'm going along."" " | 0 |
I don´t understand, I´ve red in lots of books that they were equal in numbers. The european side were allied with many nstions, so they could have afford with at least 180,000 men! Only 10,000 during siege is a complete impossibility! | 0 |
May 2008
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Inuit. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. | 0 |
"
Stolen Earth
Hi, just dropping a note: I believe that the article is now eligible under the ""five-fold expansion"" DYK rule. Thanks! '''''' " | 0 |
"
The term ""national"" (referring to the Québecois or French Canadian nationality rather than to an independent country) has been in use for many decades or even centuries in Quebec. It is not challenged even by federalist Quebeckers. " | 0 |
"
[ec] He is elderly now, and semi-retired, but I suppose he could be referred to as the old fashioned Man of letters. Some more of his writings include: presented evidence to the House of Commons, UK more available. As for Pappe, he acknowledges he could care less about the facts he's a partisan. And as for another source for Mike Isaacson's quote maybe when we get another one for someone named ""Gideon""... " | 0 |
"
There is no need for the term ""militant"" in this context. There already exists satisfactory terminology for this sort of thing. Terrorists are civilians who attack civilians. Partisans are civilians who organize and fight soldiers. Soldiers are government employed fighters. 'Militant', honestly, could mean any of those things." | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Prisoner of War Medal 1940-1945 | 0 |
)
15:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC | 0 |
"We have no words for speaking of wisdom to the stupid. He who understands the wise is wise already."" Georg Christoph Lichtenberg
""" | 0 |
"
I was looking for an actual quote and I only found this: ""The Chechen leader has derided allegations that he dispatched militias to Ukraine"" Again, you don't seem to know what paramilitary means. Just because some rebels ""look like they come from North Caucasus"", does not mean there is a Chechen paramilitary force operating in Eastern Ukraine. You might want to read wiki page on Paramilitary. Educate yourself. " | 0 |
I never said it would happen. I just said that I wouldn't be suprsed if it does. I made that guess based on everything that's happened so far in Naruto, and the way Kishimoto creates plot twists of this kind. Now your comment is what seems fanboyish and unjustifiable. Kabuto already seemed to have a kind of kind of second nature back during the first part of the series where his eyes would change color when he got mad. Kishimoto wouldn't give him a similar state to Juugo, because it wouldn't be something that new and because he wouldn't want to have two characters be so similar. And as for my Orochimaru possesing Itachi theory, just because something happens at one point doesn't mean it will be the same story next time. By your logic, just because Kakashi needed the help of his students (look 2-3 people right there!) to bail him out of Zabuza's trap during their first meeting, that would mean Zazbuza could have easily killed him during their second meeting when they were fighting alone. Or just because even Gaara's own father, the Kazekage himself, feared Gaara's power, a genin like Naruto shouldn't have been able to beat him let alone after he transformed. Or how could the Uchiha, being the strongest clan of Konoha, be killed so easily by a single member of their village? See? You definetly chose the wrong story to bring up that kind of logic. Practically every single fight in Naruto craps all over it. Orochimaru COULD take over Kabuto, and go on to Itachi after Sasuke's team has weakened him. Perhaps they cause him to overuse his Sharingan eyes, who knows? Orochimaru could find him, make his move, steal his body, and seek vengeance on Sasuke. The point is just that neither of us knows whats gonna happen and we'll just have to read the story. | 0 |
"
What part SPECIFICALLY is inaccurate?!! It's all accurate! Secondly no just because a user disagrees he is not a vandal, but if he removes scientific information from a scientific-related article, then inserts on sided minority views posed as facts, that IS vandalism. DocHeuh " | 0 |
"
Still concerned about balance
I've put in a fair bit of time on the article, both in verifying/cleaning content and filling in material, enough that I think I can say I have gone over things in detail.
Look, for example, at Korea and the Caribbean/Cuba/Cuban missile crisis; those are a start on what I think is encyclopedic coverage. Just to say, with no other background, that the CIA trained police or set up an Operation Gladio network really doesn't give information; I'd recommend waiting for more background and context.
There are news reports from reputable journalists, but there are also quite a number from activists for varying positions. I'm afraid I don't give equal credit to a staff writer for the Washington Post and for the Revolutionary Worker.
The article is impossibly long, yet its covert operations section is full of fragments. It's going to have to break up so those fragmentary sections can be edited; it's taking a long time to save the file now. Note that I was able to put estimative/analytic material in for Korea and Cuba. Much data of that sort is available, often in the form of the actual declassified documents. Not to put in relevant reports, National Intelligence Estimates, etc., gives the impression that the agency is purely covert operations, since the reports were almost never mentioned for countries I sawjust controversial ""dirty tricks"". That's not NPOV.
Many sources are available for the report literature, including the George Washington University National Security Archives, the Avalon Project at Yale, the archives at Mount Holyoke, the military staff colleges and research institutes, the Foreign Relations of the United States series, and even the CIA FOIA Reading Room. There is, for example, a huge amount of reporting about Southeast Asia, including strong disagreements among the CIA, military, Office of the Secretary of Defense, and White House (Sam Adams' book, War of Numbers is excellent, but also see the Pentagon Papers).
I'd like to suggest that people editing this look at some of my articles on the process of intelligence, which may help understand things that aren't just covert destabilization. Start with Intelligence cycle management, which will take you through a hierarchy of articles. The HUMINT sections do deal with clandestine rather than covert activity; I'm actively working on them. The article on Clandestine HUMINT and Covert Action is particularly relevant both in history, and balance between clandestine and covert activities. Especially in WWII, there was often a conflict between operations and intelligence gathering.
Please let me help, but understand that my reaction is that things come across as very accusatory and unbalanced. Believe me, I am very aware of both improprieties and just plain incompetence in intelligence agencies, and they need to be brought out but in an encylopedic, not fragmentary and accusatory way. " | 0 |
UNPROTECT
Un protect my talk page so the new message ber will go away | 0 |
Unblock
Three users use my computer and Wikipedia account. The person who has been accused of vandalism will not use the account. Somebody please unblock. | 0 |
Alesana Tuilagi
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. | 0 |
Yes. They think it's blocked forever anyway. | 0 |
"
Thanks. I'm not crazy about the ""arbitration exemption"" either. Arbitrators can be given whatever they need by email. " | 0 |
"
Happy easter!
Open your card >> >> >> Happy easter you guys! Sorry if the picture looked crappy, but it's the best I could do on such short notice. Sincerely, BoL (Talk) Credits: This card was inspired by BoL, an administrator/bureaucrat and head designer of Codesnippets. Join the community today!" | 0 |
, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Looks good, that wasn't so hard. lol 02:38 | 0 |
habsburgs.. this SPANISH POSSESION | 0 |
"
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar Nicos Anastasiades - Well spotted, he created eight such articles before I could get a block in! '''''' (Talk) " | 0 |
. Signed, Anonymous for now | 0 |
Probably not the brightest idea to vandalize from RCN Corporation's computers either. | 0 |
"
209.122.104.163
Are you particularly enjoying reverting * 22:54, 2005 Jan 14 (UTC)" | 0 |
February 2006 (UTC))
If there are only 8 people in wiki that can check the ip then contact these 8 people, if you can not contact them then give me the names and I will contact them. This clear and obvoius atempt by to miss credit me must be invastigated. And that this if anything is a clear personal attack.
Ask the 8 what country my ip is from and that users ip is from also ask what country ip is from if that user and ip is from the same country then it could very possibly be who created that account just for the reason to misscredit me.
( 09:29, 21 | 0 |
she saved us all
hello boy and girl
she saved us from sinking in the titanic but she had a javalen stuck in her......................... they are coming | 0 |
"
Actually, brings up a good point; to clarify:
No, the word ""cunt"" was not used as a personal attack against the blocking admin, but yes, it was used out of frustration to refer to •talk• " | 0 |
Oh, I see someone has already identified you, Qwyrxian. Okay, onto your wikipediot friends. Have it your way! | 0 |
"
I don't think so that editing could fail any article. As I said, I'm done with the edits. Saw you reverted. It's not your article. I'm reverting it back. I'll not listen you everytime. That negative review could be there. Haha. You can't respect others work and their work. I'm throughout resolving issues and you are getting me down.—Prashant " | 0 |
He prabably in, don't worry. | 0 |
Generic fair use rationales are, by definition, impossible. | 0 |
I don't know, will you kill me if I say yes? | 0 |
"
TTN, Just merge it and do the best job you can, I've lost all hope, I can't even make a decent job of my namesake. talk " | 0 |
It would appear gabberfoxx that your edits are being not being made in good faith, as you knowingly alter the infobox information to be wrong. | 0 |
I'm a long-time WP user. And i absolutely know that nothing will happen if i start a discussion. Pure experience, dude. They revert, but they never discuss. | 0 |
Yeah, revert my edit, you conformist. | 0 |
Blocking
I blocked those two users. Am i not allowed to do that? | 0 |
I have no idea what it is. It was in the commemorative coin and trials cabinet. I thought it might be one side of a commemorative coin? I'll get it processed and uploaded... | 0 |
I would like to let you know that you have committed harassment against me. Nevertheless, I will not get indulged in such a violent fight. Please read the text and learn what an academic ranking is. Lack of success of a university is not your personal issue. Please stay calm. | 0 |
That's more or less finished now if you want to nominate it. | 0 |
" | decline=You are blocked directly -your unblock request above is the correct template to use. XMan " | 0 |
"Tell someone who cares, Fair Deal. =) Wikipedia isn't a place where people with more push can bully their way to the top of the pyramid. I've been told by non-Wiki Libs mods again and again that sources should be added to verify additions. You're negating the entire definition of positive research what you're saying, as I have stated civilly... you ADD sources to prove something. I was not aware that an encyclopedia was invented just to disprove rumors and heresy.
As early as November, Elizabeth Bathory confirmed that unless no sources for hard rock were added, it wasn't going to be added. And that was the end of it. Then Wiki Libs comes back around April and starts firing up the whole debate again out of his own amusement, after a resolution had been reached. I am unable to understand why Megadeth's mainstream discography can't be labeled as just primarily heavy metal. NWOBHM bands, which Megadeth has a major amount of influence from, are just generally labeled as ""heavy metal"", so why not Megadeth? A handful of radio-friendly songs from Risk and maybe Cryptic Writings do not justify the entire rehaul of Megadeth's genre.
" | 0 |
, some of which I have copied below | 0 |
"
Requested move 6 November 2015
:Enchanted (2007 film) → – This was the title until recently when the article was moved, presumably to accomodate the creation of Enchanted (1942 film). However, I found few if any sources indicating that the 1942 Czech picture was ever called ""Enchanted"", so I moved it to its original title, Okouzlená. That makes the date is unnecessary here, as there are no other articles for films titled ""Enchanted"". It seems vanishingly unlikely that this would cause any confusion, so policy would recommend we go with the more WP:CONCISE title for this much more prominent film. t/c " | 0 |
Stroking a cat
Why do humans enjoy stroking cats more so than any other animal? | 0 |
"
Priyanka Chopra
Could you please take a look at Priyanka Chopra and make any comments on the talk page? I am not sure if Dr. Bofeld is done with it yet, but I just gave it a copyediting. I am asking you now because of the interactions I saw between he and you over those recent GARs involving Prashant. I want you to be happy with the article before we take it back to FAC (not during or after). Thanks, | talk " | 0 |
, so I can't do much more myself. | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.