text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
Hello ViolinGirl
Hey there, this is Daniel, lurking about as an IP as I have been doing more and more often these days, the next step would be a proper return from break. ) How are you doing? What is the current exam situation? I noticed that I failed to answer a question of yours in your last message... Yes I have been to the US, in fall 2000, really beautiful. I spent most of my time in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, and in New York state, visiting NYC was really incredible...I also had the oppurtunity to go sightseeing in DC, Smithsonian and all ). Anyway, I hope your weekend has been great and that all is well with you. Cheers | 0 |
Hi Canoe, simple copyediting doesn't require going to the sources at hand for something high level like this, and I am already familiar with the incident. Best regards. | 0 |
August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. It is my gradual work, but sourcing was going to be the last thing I did after I got around to redoing the modern history, but I havent had much time recently (not that Ièm the only one who could do it *cough*), so sourcing has suffered as well. Its the least fun part, lol going back and citing census figures, or the historie of travaile in Virginia, or the other documents, but I have been archiving the stuff for when I do get a chance, maybe in another week or so. 00:54, 14 | 0 |
"
Yes, indeed. I see that some date insertions by RjwilmsiBot are not in yyyy-mm-dd format, and I'm wondering how it's done. BTW, there are now over 100 thousand articles tagged with and 10 thousand with . I'm sure these tags can be detected and dates formatted accordingly. ¡digame! " | 0 |
the physical person is not clearly dying in a painful way - he seems clearly happy and well, which is why he says his physical body should be treated as a Universal Monarchs. | 0 |
Is there any way to dispute a sources reliabillity? Especially in a case like this where it seems everyone is re-reporting what the Dail Mail reported and the Daily Mail cite an un-named photographer as their source. Also with the Daily Mail being a tory newspaper and porter coming under anti tory comments it would be in the Daily Mail's best intreast to paint the crowd in the most negative light they can and by throwing around claims of anti semetic abuse that is exactly what they have done. They cannot be considered reliable in any sense of the word in this case and i think there should be someway for us to object to their reliabillity, everyone else who re-reported what the Daily Mail should not be considered a source at all because they are not94.168.210.8 | 0 |
April 2011 (UTC)
sockpuppet notice
TAB+TAB
I'm sick and tired of you putting those sockpuppet notices on my page. Why don't you stay off of the St. John's page and stay off of my page as well! This is harassment! I'm gonna be off the block really soon and there isn't anything you can do about it! After that.. we'll see who is gonna win this edit war! 198.83.120.99 19:45, 27 | 0 |
Umair Ashraf ('Flores hymn') is the Departmental anthem of Flores, (Flores Department) which is an Administrative Division of the country of Uruguay.
Cultural note
Uruguay is notable that as well as its national anthem, various of its departments have also adopted their own anthems in an effort to promote civic identity and responsibility.
Writer and composer
The words and music of the anthem are written by Danilo Pallares Echeverría.
Description
The hymn consists of three stanzas, two of eight lines and one of nine lines.
They describe and celebrate the Flores Department's beauty and the achievements of its people. These are linked to the patriotic values of the Uruguayan nation.
Beyond Uruguay, universal values of humanity are evoked as being encapsulated in the Flores Department.
References
See also
Music of Uruguay
National Anthem of Uruguay
Category:Uruguayan music | 0 |
"*Looks much better. Kudos. The wording is much better. ♠ 16:27, April 16, 2008 (UTC)
" | 0 |
"
Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Wikipedia is one of the world's fastest growing internet sites. We aim to build the biggest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world. To date we have over four million articles in a host of languages. The English language Wikipedia alone has over one million articles! But we still need more! Please feel free to contribute your knowledge and expertise to our site.
If you need help see:
Help contents - the main help page.
Cheatsheet - a listing of the main editing commands.
Here are a few more good links for newcomers:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Category:WelcomeBotResearch
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using three tildes (~~~), or four (~~~~) if you want date stamp; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! " | 0 |
"
One other thing: stop calling it ""stealing"" or ""theft."" That's a BLP violation. No charges were filed against Moncrief. Her version is that she believed the credit card charges had been authorized, and she was paying them back, which strongly suggests that there was no intent to steal or defraud. Employ the very same ""give them the benefit of the doubt"" you've employed when contemplating the accusations against ACORN. It is not our place to make judgments about such things. We just report verifiable, notable facts. " | 0 |
"
@Moesian: I didn't miss anything. Just because it uses the word doesn't mean squat. It says the Codex Zographensis is from Western Bulgaria. With suitability I was referring to whether or not it sourced what you claim, which it doesn't. Again, this isn't an issue of ethnicity. Your saying the Ohrid Literary School was Bulgarian is not needed in this article. Don't make this an issue of whether or not there was a Macedonian ethnicity in the middle ages.
@Laveol: The term is used in a purely geographic sense (being from this or that region, etc.). From the absence of any sources, the term West Bulgarian recension does not appear to be in current use. On the contrary, I would actually like to see term explained.
@Gligan: It doesn't matter what ""Macedonian"" meant back then, we're discussing modern terminology. A reader may also associate the Bulgarian recension with the modern Bulgarian state or even the Bulgars. " | 0 |
"
This article should be named ""Mega Drive""
The name ""Genesis"" was only used in North America and isn't the common name for the system. 80.192.85.232 " | 0 |
The article Mudbug band has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 |
No-one really knows, DavidArthur it's shrouded in mystery to those outside the railway industry | 0 |
"
I sent an email to Kevin Foley at Philipstown.info. Hopefully he can clear it up. Yours, " | 0 |
Editor at Large have done very nice work! | 0 |
Note: the above warning is baseless and the user appeared to have given it based on a content dispute. Thank you. |heru|nar | 0 |
"
As could be clearly read here, I wasnt asking for any unblock, but to talk to Tawker, so unless you had the intention to contact him for me, or to contact me directly I dont see why you have put your finger in it.
Please any other admi coming here, do not remake the same mistake and give my smoke signals further to the rigth target: Tawker.
I dont care about being unblock, I do care about being treated as a person and been given acomment and else that outsiders dont mingle in a case that they do not know a single thing about.
Being reverted for not adering 100% to all mormons theories is in my view a direct attack to the first amendement.
Here are some proove for what I have advanced in some of my edits (I have edited from the 10th of june 2006 in the evening to the 14th of june 2006 in the afternoon, with being subject ton unfounded personal attacks and reverts without explainations from my first edits. Both from other editors (all mormons) and from administrators who were also mormons.
As you are not an administrator and not the one this edit VERY VISUALLY is adressed to, so you should have step away or contact the person himself to ask him to take a look here.
your actions in that case are counter productiv Pgk and waist my time and place in wikipedia.
Try to bode for this or use it as a learning stuff for future times.
Do not make the mistake of using your previous type of experiences in vandalism as a stonehenge model for all situations.
Take into account the basis and what actually occured in the case at hand and that the people who generated personnals attacks against me did it without having been subject to such on my part, and only by assuming things about me who werent true.
Even when confronted with that fact they pursued their personal attacks in form of racism and accusing me of lying and calling me a troll, and all their edits stating those have not been removed nor do those editors have been sanctioned nor even warned.
Most probably because they appeal to mormon administrators to begin with.
I have written contributions in only 2 days, before all were reverted without explainations. That i was blocked on the basis of NPA is a cynical joke, as I thad tried for days to make the other editors to stop agressing me ´by answering my edits with personal attacks and to instead adrees the content of those edits.
I have in all my answers to them specifically and always adress the contain of their edits directly and accuratly, that it had contain also similarity with personal attacks has to be seen in the ligth that their edits were made of 90% of personal attacks and false allegations about my motives and source of informations, thought i had clearly stated what those were several times, and even was falsly citated on words and sentences I had never uttered!
The feeling of being done wrong was growing for each of those unfounded attacks, and instead of getting clear and founded and logical responses, I was confronted with further illigetimates handling as a pseudo archiving of the talk page where all edits, incl the 4 th last, had been removed, and the talk page was left blanck, and was officialy choosen to dont reply to my first edit, who was never adressed, meaning its contain and not me as a person.
The last edit written by me had been deleeted from the archive and the historic, which I didnt accept, as I know it was against wiki rules. No explainations nor warning were given nor the possibility to contact the admi who had done so as on his talk page he pretended to be on holyday until the end of june wich I found odd as he had done those actions a couple of hours ago.
Nobody being there to can talk that matter through with, nor any others being named to take over, and no plausible explanations being given for doing those hidden reverting of the page, I took the initiative to reinteger the last 4 edits in the actual empty talk page, as mean to pursue the communication and arrived at a propper reaction regarding the contain of my contribution and not personal attacks against me nor disuasiv terror actions being made against me.
I argued about it and explained my actions abundently both before I did it, and at the end of those, with a clear stand point concerning my worries about the freedom of expression being severely enfringe in wikipedia and the danger of letting this type of actions going on without control, as well as seeing wikipedia getting too onesided on a relevant amount of articles.
I hope this clarified some point and i didnt appreciate being bulled nor sanctioned by an admi who officially recognised not having read the edits he removed and reverted and archived, nor having read my explaination for reinserting some of those from the archive to the talk page, and also being warned and threatened and banned from an admi, the same, who didnt look at all at the contain | 0 |
I personally don't think Ivan belongs here at all. It's just that it's big news so everyone wants to mention it. |✎ 01:39, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
Possibly it is true, but I for one am questioning this statement - where's the proof that he's the most widely publicized humpback whale in history? | 0 |
"
Talkbalk
follow on to our discussion on Fowler's tp —Spiff " | 0 |
I won't remove the sock-puppet, but just let me edit the page one more time. And may I ask why the hell I'd continue contributing positively if I cant even reference to my own work? And I hope you have taken heed of my final coment | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of Ciaran keenan
A tag has been placed on Ciaran keenan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. (talk) " | 0 |
"
Hmm, let's see. Wiki is a community-based consensus driven entity, theoretically at least. Now if Raul refuses to engage and won't step down (and there are OBVIOUS serious concerns regarding him and his FA kingdom), then wouldn't that be counter to the core wiki philosophy? Methinks so. talk " | 0 |
"
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diplomacy You are the McDaddy of peaceful resolution, and I envy you your patience and persistence. " | 0 |
"
Blocked for vandalism of Wikipedia
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. " | 0 |
Response: As I stated above, these were not bad faith nominations. I truly believe these are non-notable artists in a non-notable band. They don't meet a single point of the 12 set forth in WP:MUSIC. If they do, and that reference can be verified. Feel free to add it and I'll publicly change my opinion. Additionally, the pages were created my the band's webmaster. The article speak for themselves, there were not a single reference or source in any of the four articles asserting any kind of notability at all. Not one. WebHamster's mere assertion without any cited sources does not establish notability. This is not Hamster-pedia. If the discussions had been left open, I suspect the consensus would have agreed with me. | 0 |
That's Absander's prose, condensed by me into the draft I proposed above. I'm a little confused by what happened here - I posted a draft for comments so that editors could come to consensus on it before putting it in the main article space, you commented on it, I made changes based on your comments, and I posted the result to the main article space. It turned out you had a lot of additional corrections and concerns, and I disagree with some of your edits so far. The section as it stands now has a number of new problems - grammar, level of detail, warning tags, etc. It actually looks like the best idea would be to move the whole section back to the talk page and discuss it more thoroughly - does that sound like a good idea? | 0 |
"Nothing of the kind==
I sought a considered determination, not a defensive, opinionated and punitive reflexive response from this immature cult of wikipedia ""geeks"".
The ""processes"" of Wikipedia seem to me so much rubbish. So it's good luck to you all.
==" | 0 |
I figure you were probably monitoring the article and noticed by now, but I wanted to let you know that I posted a section about Hamzah in the Syrian Uprising article a day and a half ago or so. When I finished, I had a splitting headache and had to log off but I wanted to be sure and let you know. If this does take the situation there to the next level, and people there are still demonstrating in his name in a couple of weeks, or stage a continuing demonstration as they did in Tahrir Square, we can expand it into its own article.
The day after I wrote you last, I woke to the news that Will Norton's body had been found, after six days. The whole week his family had been appealing for any word about him, and they kept showing his photo on the news. He had been driving home from school with his father in the car and his mother had taken her own car. They were only a few blocks from home when the Joplin tornado hit. It picked the vehicle up and rolled it several times and his father, in the passenger seat, had held onto him until his arm was torn from its socket as Will was sucked out of the vehicle through the sunroof.
Two hours earlier he had graduated high school. | 0 |
Ladin
Here are some interesting links for you to read. So, this professor mentions Nones as a Ladin language . This article discusses things some too . | 0 |
, Reactivity, Transition state, Activated complex, Rate-determining_step, Baeyer strain theory, Dynamic stereochemistry, Kinetic_isotope_effect, Catalyst, Rate_of_enzyme_mediated_reactions, Michaelis-Menten kinetics, [[Enzyme | 0 |
"
Here is what you have written about this peer reviewed journal and I quote ""Just because a journal is peer-reviewed etc does not implicitly give it the kudos to be used by us"". So before removing any article/source, read it and get it reviewed from others and then decide whether to remove it or not. No matter even if the study is old ABO blood grouping still exists and this study was based upon very sound scientfic experiment of ABO blood grouping. I do not see any reason that why a scientific study which provides info about the link of Sainis had to be removed." | 0 |
", 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Those ""different amounts of charge"" are still charge density, not eg Q(x,y,z) = 1.6*10^-6 Coulombs. Typically dopant density is measured in atoms per cc. 23:46" | 0 |
Light my fire
Thanks for being thorough. I have now added more specific refs for Larry Knechtel. | 0 |
Namures:
Regarding editing of page Quasicrystal:
Hello. Please explain your revertation to my editing. I have included a link as reference. But if you need another please add reference to this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Lu , as he's the person who publish the discovery. Thanks. | 0 |
Changes==
Hi,I have made the changes to the article. What I ended up with is slightly different than what I submitted below. I welcome your input. I tried to maintain the core and format of the orginal article. I thought that the original article only gave the insurance industry point of view, so I retained that and added the health insurance reformers or consumers point of view. I didn't want to get too technical or statistically, is that a word?, since this is a general interest encyclopedia.
I learned about the wik from an article in the Atlanta Journal Constitution. April 17.
I have created an account. Since I'm new, I'm not sure about procedures, so feel free to tell me if I mess up.
Jim—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) .
== | 0 |
" May 2005 (UTC)
Dear Flamekeeper,
I did not censor your ""entry""! I only moved it into the archive since
a) the talk page is quite long
b) your ""question"" hadn't been discussed here for some time
c) your ""question"" neither has anything to do with Benedict XVI himself nor with editing the wiki page (as can be seen by your absence from the history.
If you want to discuss this, you should do so on the pages of Kaas, Pius XI and Pius XII, but it'd best to concentrate on one page to concentrate the discussion (if it is that what you want)
For my part I will address your post in time on the Pius XII talk page and nowhere else.
09:51, 9" | 0 |
Why do you make films? | 0 |
I just wanted to ask, why doesn't this say anything about the arrest or abuse that took place at WMA? Several arrest were made amongst those in the adminstration of this school. People ended up in the witness protection program as a result of some of the crimes that took place at this school. How is there nothing mentioning the drug trafficing, solicitation of prostitution, and physical abuse and neglect that took place at this school? I wish scars were a resource because I still have those left over from Wentworth even though it is seven years later. | 0 |
I think the protests deserve their own table and its important to keep impartial. A section on violence, intimidation (i.e. the death threats that have been posted in the article) needs to seperate the two. There are hard facts to be laid out statistically and there are important events and actions that need to expanded upon. Need to go through the whole activities section seperating wheat from chaff as there is a lot of un-necessary repetition. The chanting could be summed up in a quick paragraph about the protests. Violence needs expanded upon. | 0 |
No Anome, what matters is the correct matching up of the maths to physical reality, and the polar coordinate system is the one that is tailor made to deal with concepts such as centrifugal force and Coriolis force.
The centrifugal force is a radial effect and the Coriolis force is a tangential effect.
But before we can use the expressions in polar coordinates we must construct a physical model of a real situation and then construct a differential equation around it, usually in the scalar variable of radial distance.
If you were in the slightest genuine about this topic, you would have read the section which I added to the main article yesterday. You would have blocked PeR for vandalism and wikistalking for having erased it on specious grounds.
It hardly needed sourced since it is standard planetary orbital theory which obviously none of you know anything about. In fact I did mention Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
The picture that I am getting here is that the article has been hi-jacked by a group who have had a basic introduction to circular motion but who would be incapable of handling elliptical or hyperbolic motion and so they will all make sure that no such generalizations appear in the main article.
Your group has indulged in a number of deceitful tactics which I will now list.
(1) Making arguments in polar coordinates but jumping into Cartesian coordinates to conceal the flaws. The main example is circular motion, which is all that you seem to be capable of considering. You accept one moment that there is a radially outward centrifugal force balancing a radially inward centripetal force. But as soon as the centrifugal force becomes inconvenient for you, you claim that it vanishes in the inertial frame, even though the centripetal force remains. That is just a nonsense.
(2) Trying to drag in the three body problem while totally sweeping the two body problem under the carpet. This is because you feel more comfortable in a field that nobody can understand. It is good cover for talking nonsense.
(3) Introducing Lagrangian mechanics.
(4) Introducing Hamiltonian mechanics.
(5) Introducing matrix algebra.
(6) Quoting Feynam.
We have seen all these tactics used in a pathetic attempt to deny the fact that centrifugal force only occurs when a particle actually possesses an angular velocity relative to a point.
The section which I put in yesterday contained partically all hat you need to know about centrifugal force. But that was too good for you. You much prefer that big mindless waffle of an introduction that tells us absolutely nothing about centrifugal force. | 0 |
"
| style=""padding: 0.1em"" |
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
Autoblock of 4.224.150.217 lifted or expired.
Request handled by: AJ
|}" | 0 |
Haha, thanks.. Yes, basically... an important point is that information needs to be verifiable by independent sources. Otherwise, it is considered original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. If you can show coverage by independent sources, you are well on your way to showing it is notable. (talk) | 0 |
to achieve a false consensus | 0 |
"""free source"" train, keep safety in mind. And finally the reminder. It is not a threat. Officials truly are watching the page and planning to take appropriate action." | 0 |
(1948 film)|Red River]]'' | 0 |
"
Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Policy on neutral point of view
Guideline on external links
Guideline on conflict of interest
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! talk " | 0 |
"
Poor formating
Somebody should move in to improve the format of this article; especially the paragraphs and sections. '''''''''' Msg " | 0 |
Why not? Some dirty c2c, maybe? Or a dirty story? 95.247.163.50 | 0 |
In that case, I started one ) | 0 |
Ans. Non-rotating Skyhook. | 0 |
"
There is already a brief mention of Ihsan in the last line of the Etymology section (too brief). It would be great if you can expand that sentence and start a new section for the general meaning of islam. This should also serve as a general introduction to the Articles and Pillars concepts. So Just be bold and start editing the article. (55) " | 0 |
Did you intend to remove all the content about West's possible 2nd marriage? | 0 |
"
Non-feminist directors mentioned... why?
Why is it that Kathyrine Bigelow and Catherine Hardwicke are mentioned as examples of ""women's cinema"" directors? In the article on Male Gaze ""Twilight"" is represented as a modern example of objectifying material, and Bigelow directed ""Point Break"" which has us in the seat gazing at Lori Petty.
Hardly feminist, is all.
" | 0 |
Yes, it's still being used, but nowadays usually not as monotherapy, and in smaller doses than in the Concorde study. The main finding of the Concorde study was, that they could find no benefit in taking the drug before the symptoms appear, ie. the progression to advanced disease wasn't affected.
I wouldn't call the difference in death rate (176/171) statistically higher (bad luck?). After all that was just one study, there are others that contradict. Here's a couple of sites on AZT safety: a WHO study, NIAID site and AEGiS. 18:22, Jul 27, 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
A tag has been placed on Hillsboro Aviation, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 |
"
needs correction as follows: # Zaidi (Shia) AND # Ibadi (Khawarij)
Amman Message
In the modern era, Sadiq al-Mahdi, the former Prime Minister of Sudan, defined the recognized schools of Muslim jurisprudence as eight specific schools.Hassan Ahmed Ibrahim, ""An Overview of al-Sadiq al-Madhi's Islamic Discourse."" Taken from The Blackwell Companion to Contemporary Islamic Thought, p. 172. Ed. Ibrahim Abu-Rabi'. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. ISBN 978-1-4051-7848-8 The Amman Message, a three-point ruling issued by 200 Islamic scholars from over 50 countries, officially recognizes those eight legal schools of thought.The Three Points of The Amman Message V.1
Hanafi (Sunni)
Maliki (Sunni)
Shafi'i (Sunni)
Hanbali (Sunni)
Ja'fari (Shia) (including Mustaali-Taiyabi Ismaili)
Zaidi (Shia)
Ibadi (Khawarij)
Zahiri" | 0 |
Okay, you got me there. I hope you can appreciate my frustration with
all of this noise, and see the need to get some facts straight.
as long as i am here;
I did have a link so that people could find it. (Archive) It was deleted.
Not my fault. Sorry bout the capitalization. By the way, merecat
unarchived it all, so theres no point right now. | 0 |
this seems to be an excellent online resource. | 0 |
I know perfectly well what 'typical' means, thank you very much. | 0 |
sites making a mocery | 0 |
I got a better idea
stfu and stop spreading lies and misinformation on wikipedia. you think you can handle that? | 0 |
Mikalah Gordon
I think that was her, she was about Eurasian (mixed ancestry), selective mutism, and January 14, 1988. | 0 |
Hello, Bigace00028, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on . Again, welcome! | 0 |
How is that offensive? Jews are using it all the time. | 0 |
"
You can do a ""See also"" within a footnote to accommodate a note in a note. And you certainly can have expository footnotes that explain the text more. I just read through the article again, and I think it may have gone too far in the whitewash direction: for example, it's ok to say that she clarified her educational background and have a footnote, but the footnote ought to say what was being clarified - this way is too vague and not at all clear that there was some obfuscating going on. Similarly, saying her ""role in a potential Giuliani administration"" and not saying (even in footnote) what was controversial, I think is misleading. There may be a few other places too. I'm all for NPOV and not suggesting that this be an attack article, but I think, as I said, it's gone too far over toward a whitewash. |talk " | 0 |
G13
I've removed and postponed G13 on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Margaret Bartholomew because it may have promise. Also, you should notify the page creator when nominating G13. Tagging G13 without checking the contents of the article is rather pointless, because of the existence of Category:G13 eligible AfC submissions; tagging G13 should only be done to save sysop time by reviewing the plausibility of there being an article about the subject and deciding there's little chance, otherwise you should make an edit to postpone G13 using . Thanks. '''''' (t / c / ) | 0 |
"
mistakes like italicizing half of guardian ad litem, but not all of it.
Hey, if that's all you want to do, have at it. But what I read was seriously out of whack with the ""copyediting"" approach that you insist on describing. " | 0 |
Actually, I was wondering if it would be possible to have an extra picture: of a fully ripened one. We currently only have pictures of young and half ripened mushrooms. | 0 |
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/CCI/article.asp?ID=1296 shows that for most of the last thirty years, inflation in the UK has hovered between 2 and 5 per cent. Even at the uppermost figure, you wouldn't have expected prices to increase more than 125 per cent between 1983 and 2008, when in fact they've increased 667 per cent. If we could find a published quote referring to price complaints, this would be ironclad, but even if we can't I still feel it's decent content. After all, it's much better supported than most of the stuff in the article and people are only objecting to it because it's criticism. | 0 |
Samuel Luo= Yueyuen, Kent888, Mr. He
how could you have been so naive? | 0 |
"
Images (different sources, same image)
I was talking to Tsuyoshi Kato, who wrote ""Images of Colonial Cities in Early Indonesian Novels"" in this book. He has told me that the scans included in his paper are from the first editions, which for some would allow use on Wikipedia ().
However, I've noticed that several of the same etchings seem to have been reused in my copy of Sitti Nurbaya; my edition was published in 2008. Would the republishing extend the date of copyright or no? " | 0 |
I guess we can leave it as it is, then, but this hotel seems like a pipe dream at this point; it was first scheduled for 2006, and 2008 is almost over. My own informal hearsay indicates that Concorde has dropped out entirely, and they are seeking a new developer. | 0 |
The word is mentioned in one of the parts of The Sandman graphic novel. | 0 |
October 2007
`'Míkka | 0 |
New Photographs
Hey Matt, I just want to take the time to comment on the latest round of Riverina photographs you have taken (I'm even slightly envious because I just haven't had the time to get out there recently) but getting such a big lot of them including Mairjimmy whose page was deleted by another editor because it had no image is fantastic. However then when I was about to post this message I saw the link to your Darwin Station photos and they are brilliant also. (I assume you must be travelling with work and not driving yourself up the centre?) talk | 0 |
I likewise misunderstood yours. Let us forget all about it. Here he is! Best wishes! | 0 |
"
No, it doesn't, Wikipedia will remain a honeypot for Nazis with superior powers of hypocrisy and tedium, however much ""sport"" i ""go and do"". As a law student I was interested in how Wikipedia policies work in principle and in practice - I found out what I needed to know. They don't work. Returning to edit that page after some ""sport"" would just be pissing in the wind. I patiently discussed and collaborated with Nazis (irony) on editing Wikipedia and it didn't improve Wikipedia at all.
I hear from your grammar you are quite likely to be Eastern European or Very Eastern European, and if you are, I suggest you patrol illogical antisemitic arguments over your homeland instead of rattling the swearbox in support of Nazis. I assumed good faith with Tataral (as i do with you) and it got Wikipedia nowhere. " | 0 |
Talkback
Identifying the helmets | 0 |
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Pondolea) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | 0 |
I think you aren’t a bit interested in improving Wikipedia with facts because if you were interested you would also realize the wonderful things my scientific report points out. Wikipedias rules are the following “it´s ok to use your own work if it´s benefits others.”
You must prove my report and explanation about acceleration in plastic deformation false, then it doesn’t benefit anyone and my report can be deleted as a reference.
Please prove me wrong, I’m interested in you ability to match mathematical models and the reality. | 0 |
Juffo-Wup is All... omni-existent, spreading and changing the Non into Juffo-Wup. You are the Non, who must become Juffo-Wup or Void. 4.240.244.226 | 0 |
"
Black comedy-drama
The show uses black comedy for language and situations that encounter (*Note it's rated ""M""), and its also a drama. I'm adding the genre back and anyone has any questions please respond here and/or my talk page. . Talk " | 0 |
"This article is a grammatical mess. The first two paragraphs are full of redundancies and little useful information. I would use SlimVirgin’s suggestion for the first paragraph:
“Ali Sina is the founder of Faith Freedom International, a site set up to help Muslims leave Islam. According to the website, Sina is himself a former Muslim, now a secular humanist of Iranian-Canadian nationality.""
And for the second paragraph I suggest the following:
The name Ali Sina may be a pseudonym. (This is fact! Nowhere has he said Ali Sina is not his real name. If he has, I never saw it. Has anyone? I read somewhere he wrote that his mother named him Ali because of some Shiite credence) Sina says because of the death threats he does not wish to be filmed. Some of his opponents claim he hides his real identity because he is not an ex-Muslim. OceanSplash 11 Dec.2005 08:57
" | 0 |
or at least block him too
}} | 0 |
This is overwith and I reverted the offending comment. , Monday March 6 2006 at 05:36 | 0 |
"
Well, the languages are similar as Portugese and Spanish, I hope you've noticed the differences between this languages. But to say that a language is intensiosly developed just for ""so"", it is wrong. every language developes spontaniously by its speakers, as the way of thinking changes so and the voice form, here are some examples: the word Macedonian:вреден (vreden) in macedonian means a person who is working hard in the positive sence, or something which we can make some use of, but inBulgarian:вреден (vreden) it hase the opposite meaning than the macedonian, literaly it means ofending'.- " | 0 |
"
Excellent option, thank you. come howl! " | 0 |
Well it looks like you're completely determined. I guess there's no stopping you, given that you waited all of 23 hours for further discussion, before reverting my reversion (did someone mention an edit war?). It's a pity you aren't prepared to engage with other editors or even familiarise yourself with the concept of consensus. I was about to make some points, but frankly I can't be bothered. It's a small article, there are few other editors interested, and in cases like this, deletionists always get their way. Good luck with your future endeavours. | 0 |
PAUL WOLFOWITZ JEWED AMERICA | 0 |
FrankTobia, I am sorry to say, but when you say the debt can be paid off you are, in fact wrong, because of one and only one thing, the application of interest by the federal reserve that is applied to the only money printed and in circulation. So that fact being true in all terms, The debt will never be able to be repaid to that which is the Federal Reserve Bank. If the debt were repaid, the money would cease to exist leaving no value in the monetary system. Frank, im sorry to say that the only banking book that is a valued resource is the book Modern Money Mechanics written in 1913 by the Federal Reserve Bank. Also, if you look at the shareholders of each Fed Bank they will all lead back to the same people, mostly located in Europe. By saying that the federal reserve bank/system does not work for profit, yet they apply interest to all loans derived from them as a source is really denying that you are credible in any way, and im not saying this as an insult, but the only reason of interest to be applied IS to make a PROFIT. Feel free to reply to this at any time or email me at randomrd@gmail.com, I will be copying this and reposting it daily to prevent editing. 71.55.122.30 Sam Gelman | 0 |
"
Not sure what you mean. I deleted nothing sourced to Russia Profile. , talk to me " | 0 |
Vandal
Dear WP Sysop Stifle,
, an ordained teacher of the Hamsa Yoga Sangh cult has been creating havoc for the past weeks by relentlessly inserting the name of his guru, his guru's book, quotes from his guru's book, and external link to their website on the following articles Kriya yoga, Mahavatar Babaji, Nath, and Adi Nath when the majority of the editors (actually all of them) who are experts on the subject agree that his guru is illegitimate, his inserts does not enrich (add anything substantial) the already existing articles, and only aims to promore the personal interest of their organization.
This wants to turn WP into a propaganda material for a highly questionable (possibly harmful) pseudo-Hindu cult while pretending to be an impartial concerned Wikipedian who only wants to enrich it. The situation is really bad. He has just been banned but as soon as he gets unbanned he begins to relentlessly vandalize the pages with irrelevant and immaterial cult propaganda once again.
It is futile to try and protect the integrity of an article when someone like this person , like the Energizer Bunny, keeps on reverting them and gets away with it without being taught a lesson.
To see for yourself that Hamsacharya dan is really an ordained teacher of the cult he keeps on inserting to the articles and not just a concerned Wikipedian with no alterior motive, please see the following website [List of Authorized Teachers] and scroll down a bit for Hamsacharya Dan Kogan.
Please help us. Will you help us?
Thanking you in advance, | 0 |
"
Critias. Harmonia recruited you while saying he would not engage in discussion. Obviously implying you should not discuss things also. On the other hand you wrote this: ""I support 2 separate pages leaving the current page title non-lethal only."" " | 0 |
Hey, your response to my statements in the Discussion Page for the Montreal Expos was obnoxious. Apologize. | 0 |
Do you know anything about the postulated Venetic language, 'Old European' hydonymy and their possible role in shedding light on the Venethi | 0 |
translation
The misuse of definite and lack of indefinite articles shows that this is a translation. Please provide a link to the original so somebody can correct the translation.
108.18.136.147 | 0 |
problem with english?
You have problem with english? See ruled => rulled. | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.