text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
New Orleans
15. “During this period, Oswald began to consider returning to the Soviet Union or going to Cuba.” There is a no source cited here because it is impossible to know Oswald’s considerations. We can hypothesize but it is better to present the facts and let the reader do their own thinking. The statement is not fair because it grasps at the bounds of the imagination by assuming that the Mexico trip took place. Since that entire incident was even questioned by the Warren Commission’s own investigator into the incident, Wesley Liebeler, the alleged Mexico trip cannot be used as basis for the conclusion that Oswald wanted to move to Russia or Cuba.
16. “The [pamphlet] trial got news media attention…” There was no trial. Oswald pled guilty to disturbing the peace and paid a $10 fine. (Warren Report vol. XXV p.117 Exhibit 2216.) The “ARREST” go media attention. Notably absent from the wikipedia paragraph is his strange relationship with FBI Agent John Lester Quigley, the first person to visit Oswald in jail.
17. “…Jim Garrison in his unsuccessful attempt to link Oswald to wealthy local businessman Clay Shaw.” His attempt was very successful. HSCA noted the credibility of Garrison’s link from Shaw to Oswald. It called the Clinton witnesses whom saw the two together. “The Committee found that the Clinton witnesses were credible and significant.” (HSCA Report page 171.)
18. Concerning Oswald and David Ferrie, “However, there is no credible evidence they had any significant contact when Oswald was a teenager.” The source cited is footnote #72, HSCA vol. IX p.103-115. While it would be correct to quote HSCA’s conclusion it is an outright lie to state this as a fact. In addition to the photo of Ferrie and Oswald together the Warren Commission took the testimony of Oswald’s high school classmates Fredrick O’ Sullivan (WC vol. VIII p. 27) and Edward Vobel (WC vol. VIII p.1) whom both testified to 15 year old Oswald and Ferrie meeting. Why would the Warren Commission be asking specifically about Ferrie if there was “no credible evidence”? There is also no mention of Ferrie’s motive for being with the teenage CAP. He would attempt to recruit teenage boys to molest. Both pro and anti conspiracy researchers including the Warren Commission have questioned Oswald’s sexuality due to his association with gay men in New Orleans.
19. “… [The Clinton witnesses] contained numerous contradictions to their testimony at the Clay Shaw trial in 1969, and to their testimony to the Committee in 1978.” Wikipedia editors hypocritically claim there is not enough space to include all facts and theories yet there is plenty of space to attack the Clinton LA witnesses again and again and again and again and again. Worse yet this statement is NOT in quotations as a conclusion of Gerald Posner as cited in Footnote #73. It is written in the article as an objective fact. If you are going to use statements from Posner then put them in quotations as HIS conclusions NOT facts.
Return to Dallas
20. “Oswald was last seen by a co-worker alone on the sixth floor of the Depository about 35 minutes before the assassination.” Another outright lie. Footnote #84 has cited the Warren Commission testimony of Charles Givens. The last witness to affirmatively see Oswald before the assassination was Carolyn Arnold in the lunch room at 12:15. (WC vol. XXII p. 635.) She was also interviewed by reporter Anthony Summers in ‘Conspiracy’ page 108. This lie speaks volumes as to Wikipedia’s intentions. They would rather mention a less significant witness simply to get in the statement of a “brown bag.”
In ‘Crossfire’ Jim Marrs attempts to present an even more detailed hypothesis for Oswald’s movements before the assassination but much of this is based on loose interpretations of witness statements.
It is very significant that Oswald was the ONLY employee whom did not eat their lunch outside or by a window in anticipation of the motorcade. Instead he stuck deep inside the depository in the 2nd floor lunchroom by the only accessible phone. The same room he was found in only 90 seconds after the assassination by Roy Truly and ML Baker. In ‘The Day Kennedy Was Shot’ Jim Bishop claimed Oswald salivated for 30 minutes by the sixth floor window awaiting the motorcade. This is obviously contradicted by both Carolyn Arnold and Bonnie Ray Williams whom ate his lunch by the assassination window until 12:15 or 12:20 before joining his friends on the 5th floor. His chicken bones were later found by police. (CWC) | 0 |
The statement above is symptomatic of the hoaxer's insecurity at being revealed and is basic psychological projection as is made abundantly clear by reading everything the hoaxer has posted, and I might add by following my IP# trail on wikipedia, which has never been associated with perpetuating any of this hoax, on the contrary, I have been trying to expose it from the beginning. hyper_individualist@yahoo.com | 0 |
"
Bilingual education in Scandinavia
Added links to the two main websites for bilingual education in Scandinavia (Norway and Sweden). Actually I am very surprised that there is no section about multilingual education in those two countries, because bilingual education is very common in those two states for over 100 languages! Will add these two sections when I get some time. " | 0 |
Why not put back the MegaSociety article?
Hi!
I read your article.
Why don't you put it back where it belongs?
It seems to have been a while since it was deleted, so maybe it's time to let it have another go... | 0 |
"
The problem is that there already is another ""Planet X"" out there in the media, one which is predicted by delusional freaks who think they have chips in their heads to collide with Earth in 2012. That Planet X has its own article, Zetatalk, so having one article for Lowell's Planet X, one article for other objects called Planet X, and another for the loony Planet X seems impractical. podous " | 0 |
"
Not going to participate in the discussion?
I asked you a question, you didn't respond. ""And why is this more notable than an article about a couple of folks saying Africans are dumber? I'm asking a question to question the validity of this article. Why is this important? Why are positive physical attributes more notable than negative ones? Assuming all other factors are equal (citations are just as valid for an article on Africans being dumber), how is this more notable?"" Slrubenstein also brought up some points, you didn't address them either. Are you going to contribute to this article, or are you just concerned with making sure no one deletes it? " | 0 |
"
Mainstream science ignores the research because (i) mainstream scientists are not, with very few exceptions, doing any research on TM. The overwhelming majority of this research is being done by a handful of people all with ties to MUM and the M Org. and (ii) virtually none of it ever gets cited in any other research other than again, by the same small circle of TM-sponsored researchers. Reread WP:SET because is specifically warns that Google News and Google Scholar are not appropriate for what you propose - trying to weigh the relative prominence of one. I have proposed a metric for the research portion of this article: use only the studies which per WP:MEDRS are regarded as the most reliable - and that would be the handful of metastudies published in peer-reviewed jounals which have done the job that the editors here are frankly incapable of doing - determining which of the ""hundreds"" of ""peer reviewed"" studies on meditation were properly conducted and appropriately documented, and then assess whether or not they show anything significant. And, I am happy to stand by my edits and my history of achieving consensus whereever and whenever other editors are actually interested in consensus. " | 0 |
Guernsey City and New Guernsey are still probably based off New Jersey and Jersey City so it should stay. - | 0 |
Ref to Great Ape rights law in Ethics
I agree with Crum375. A major issue is that the laws on animal testing by representative governments can be used as a metric of the majority ethics on animal testing. The lead of the ethics section puts forth the majority view on ethics. This caveat is an important exception. Most of the world does not perform invasive testing on Great Apes, or allow it.m OTOH, I thought Crum375's revert was an excessive use of reversion when simply correcting the reference would have been adequate (and I further disagree that the reference does not support the statement), | 0 |
"
Fort Marion article
I just noticed a Fort Marion article (no categories, only 2 articles link to it). It seems to me this is good candidate for merging into Castillo de San Marcos and setting as an . — talk " | 0 |
"
Why are you persisting on creating these. You have made no edits to update them at all. Scot " | 0 |
Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article and Removed the accurately cited statistics I added
His references do not say what he says they say. He is unable to produce a quoted citation showing the 33 million figure. He is making it up. If you want to have an encyclopedia with made up facts, where someone can add a figure of 33 million that they invented and which isn't in the article, please go ahead. But I don't think that's an encyclopedia anymore. As for me, I added a cited , with inline citations reference showing that there are only 1600 verified DGUs yearly. Not only that, Gaijins claim is not logically possible. Any elementary logic shows that what he is claiming is impossible. Think about what you are doing in allowing a vandal like Gaijin to insert fake statistics into articles to suit a political agenda when he has already been topic banned from this area and was just reinstated. He is indeed committing fraud by inserting statistics that aren't in the reference. Also, his reference is 20 years old and is intellectually discredited years ago. You might as well replace the Period Table page with Phlogiston theory. | 0 |
The fight aint over Ante!!!
She is not a Croat. She is a BosnianCroat.
She is from the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Not Kurvatska.
She is a ethnic Croat and nationality Bosnian. That you understand also! | 0 |
TERROR IS NOT NPOV
GET REAL - 20 MILLION PEOPLE DEPORTED AT GUNPOINT AGAINST THEIR WILL TO REMOTE REGIONS TO BUILD SOCIALISM, MOST SURVIVE TO TELL THEIR GRANDCHILDREN. TO CALL THIS TERRORISM IS NOT NPOV. BS COMRADE | 0 |
You can use coord with DMS values - that's oe of its benefits - input in any format; display in user's preferred format. | Talk to Andy Mabbett | 0 |
"
Lets just wait and see what some other Editors have to say about this matter that don't live in Cairns before you change it back, I ask this because when I used a newspaper as a reliable source to show the population of Thuringowa as 63,000 people, it was changed back and I was told that we have to use the ABS website and the 2006 Census figures, I was also told this on the Townsville and Thuringowa Region population figures, that I have at over 163,000 if I use the source from the Townsville Bully and again when I made the change to the 163,000 figure it got changed back within a few minutes and was told that I need to use the current Census stats, and this is what I have done for years, but now it seems that because it is for Cairns it is ok to use some story from a Cairns based newspaper and I think that this is wrong, if you want to add the 140,000+ to the Cairns page, that is fine but don't have it in the main infobox, just add it in here ""The city is rapidly expanding, with a population of 127,438 (as of Feb, 2006),[4] and is reliant on the sugar and tourism industries.""
Change the 127,438 to the 140,000+ put as of Sept 2007 add your ref and I'm sure this would be fine.
But I would like to here what other editors have to say on this.
Thanks " | 0 |
Aerial photography is PUBLIC DOMAIN by virtue of Law. (the space above you is considered public space as such photos are public domain. I have never asked or offered to be paid for my aerial photos or anything that I contributed here. | 0 |
"
Comment
I have stayed away from this discussion for a couple of days, minded to retire from Wikipedia. I'll postpone that idea a while. There is an important issue here.
Does anyone wonder why this page suddenly became the focus of attention? From 2003 until July 17 2011 the length of this talk page grew to 17,726 bytes. Since August 29 it has grown by 74,997 bytes (before this post). Meanwhile the List of castles in Wales remains rather neglected, and there is no sign of new individual county pages of castles in England getting extra attention.
A glance up this talk page to see what was written here before August 29 2011 will reveal unfailingly polite discussion. Here is a sample of what has been written recently:
""The professional attitude towards the current article has been lost to ego... As this is a shameful topic opened by Paravane... Paravane, you are ignorant and I'm tired of your possessive behaviour, against ownership guidelines... Clearly you are not competent in terms of reasonably developing an article to support the wider community... This article is a sham - a bloated mess, with weak keys, many images, and shoddy management. You have done nothing in terms of AGF of those making edits, or suggestions and continue to pursue your own mis-guided approach... As for FLC - they wouldn't touch this with a barge pole... splitting... removes the current possessive ownership attitudes which haunt the article...""
Two points in particular deserve consideration:
Some editors, faced with what appears very plainly to be a personal campaign against them, will opt to retire from Wikipedia, and especially if personal attacks are seen to achieve their purpose.
If reason is not the sole - or even the principal - mechanism of advancing a campaign, it cannot be depended upon that reason will ever be sufficient to counter it. If the campaign is obsessive, every line of reasoning will be dismissed by every possible means, and the campaign may be carried for no better reason than its opponents weary of arguing.
A practice of ignoring the breakdown of mutual respect, as a basis for cooperation in the community, can hardly fail to be damaging to Wikipedia. " | 0 |
"
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar I see you on fighting vandalism constantly, so if anyone deserves it, it's you. Cheers. " | 0 |
the numbers cant be for six months thats impossible because the participating fronts are already listed in the kursk defence operation , lol... | 0 |
"
OK. Then don't )Although I resent your suggestion that I removed your comment to ""shield [...] the complete discussion,"" especially since I just explained why I deleted it and the reason was completely different. I also agree with Kingpin, and think it somewhat inappropriate that you would be prepared to unblock an editor in exchange for concessions over a completely different issue to the one for which they were blocked. ╟─Tag►senator─╢ " | 0 |
Your email did not mention the GDFL. It doesn't have to be this complicated. Just write an article in your own words and list the website as a source. Larf 00:08, August 16, 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
"
My view on this is probably similar (but probably not identical) to Cirt's. Speaking for myself, I have two problems with the use of ""Calvinist"" on this basis: (i) there are multiple ways that calling a website 'The Calvinist Corner' the most obvious is that Slick is writing from a Calvinist perspective. Another might be that he is writing about Calvinism. To take the former as true, and draw the the conclusion that Slick is a Calvinist is an inference and thus WP:Synthesis. It's most probably true, but not the sort of thing we're meant to be doing on Wikipedia. (ii) There's a fairly strong Calvinist thread through much (most?) of conservative evangelical Christianity. There are probably dozens of articles where we could find a similar level of evidence for applying the word 'Calvinist'. We don't, and to my mind shouldn't, unless a WP:SECONDARY source feels it sufficiently relevant/important a description to make use of it. This means that such articles aren't 'loaded up' with true-but-of-doubtful-relevance WP:IINFO descriptions. I suspect that part of the problem is that much of the secondary-source writing concentrates on CARM rather than Slick personally. However this simply means that, per WP:DUE, we should follow suit. ''TalkStalk''(P) " | 0 |
Paul Gondjout GA review
Hey, it looks like you've already started a GA review on Paul Gondjout at Talk:Paul_Gondjout/GA1, however you have not noted so on the WP:GAN page. Your comment makes it seem as if you would fail it (I was about to review it myself and I probably would have done the same thing), but could you please go through and do all the proper steps for failing the article (such as removing it from the GAN page and changing the discussion page). Thanks, it would make things clearer for other reviewers! If you have any questions let me know. | 0 |
. By the way I like how you have the 9/11 page completely rigged and threaten removal of privileges of editing because somebody says the article's neutrality is way off | 0 |
'd hate to see this blow up into something bigger | 0 |
"
gija edits
according to WP:NPOV, the majority view should be referenced to ""commonly accepted reference texts."" i can't find any english reference texts that discuss this detail, but the most reputable korean-language encyclopedias clearly show the korean scholarship consensus. the theory that gija joseon was a separate entity adjacent gojoseon is described, if at all, as a minority view. describes in detail that the consensus today is that gija was likely a real figure in chinese history, but his connection to ancient joseon was a later embellishment. given treatments like , it seems to me we need less on gija joseon in this summary article, and more on the details of various current theories in the gija joseon article. of course, if there are english sources that indicate that the current scholarly consensus is something else, i'd love to see them. " | 0 |
"
Done DT. '''' - Wiki me up ® " | 0 |
"
User talk:108.25.118.37
Hi Materialscientist, please revoke his talk page access. Thanks. Kangaroo " | 0 |
I think that because of the constant attacks on some Polish editors which still continue some just assumed that these edits are yet another provocation and they did not give to much thoughts on this one. Sorry qp10qp and you uwill be able to work together for sure. | 0 |
Hi Priscilla0213, If your article is deleted before you get back to it, feel free to recreate it—hopefully with a space in the title before the parenthesis. It might be a good idea to create it in a Wikipedia:User draft like t c | 0 |
I hope so too, thanks for your help and support (in both realms). Man, would I have been pissed if he had won and I couldn't be the one to say so in his article because of Valenciano's block! I have the word doc from last night, and I'll see what I can uncover later and re-add it when I have some more time again. Thanks again, take care. | 0 |
"
User:Ian.thomson, it appears that you don't actually know the meaning of the word ""consensus""; you use it interchangeably with ""majority"". Anyway, the issue is unresolved both here and on the administrators' noticeboard, so it's totally inappropriate for you to be ramming changes through in the meantime.
As I said before, I innocently and helpfully fixed a consistency issue; it was )" | 0 |
"
How to list on AfD
Earlier today you declined a speedy delete for the Greg Caton article, so I wanted to list it as an AfD. The instructions said I had to create an account to do that, so I did. Then I placed the template at the top of the page, but I get a message in red that says, ""This template is being used in the wrong namespace. To nominate this talk page for deletion, go to Miscellany for deletion."" However, the Miscellany category seems to be for material other than articles. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks.
" | 0 |
I added Sam Malone because he was the reason to be introduced. Also, he was introduced to help Sam Malone. Then Sam Malone became his friend because... well, no one else other than Sam and Diane can pull him out of the dark hole after the wedding disaster. As for Bennett Ludlow, I don't know why I added it, but he was his mentor. Well, both shows didn't explore Frasier's relationship with Ludlow very well. | 0 |
"
Copyright status of Image:NAA6.png
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or from printed material.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:NAA6.png with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Image:NAA6.png with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. " | 0 |
b) How/why is this of relevance? | 0 |
The Taliban are a far right racist Nazi organisation. The Talibans' policies are the same as far right groups in th USA like the Republican Party and Fox News. | 0 |
Hello Salvio,
While this article about an Indian Politician from the Southern Part of India is India based however the edit warring with User Sitush was more based on what he deems right or what I deem right.
My intent is not to stop anyone from editing that page but he has substantially removed most of my contributions - some of which is genuine and majority is not.
I rest my case- you are the best judges spending more time on Wikipedia however the caution is about assumptions that only some people understand WP guidelines and others don't.
SR | 0 |
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Craig duff) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | 0 |
"
Question
Do u use Firefox Mozilla? communicator/kills " | 0 |
Will it be ever released for public use? | 0 |
I-Train
how does any of those refs prove he was on the Berlin thunder, he was never on it | 0 |
" Plus, there are way too many ""feelings"" in it, NPOV." | 0 |
Wikipedia also has a claim that it is secular. You are constantly vandalizing the pages that do not subscribe to your own narrow view of Islam. Islam is not Wahhabi terrorism, it is Shia, it is Sufi, and it is much more. You people are a mere few percent and can not claim the entire Islam. | 0 |
"
Sure you are most welcome to remove the http://ip address no problem, but why do you call that ""promotional"", with all the respect, it links to a page with much higher page rank... maybe it is WP-my personal page that is being promoted? " | 0 |
Why did you insult me?!!?!??!?! | 0 |
Your opinion on Future Sport template
As is being utilised here. While there have been some periods of rapid editting that has mostly passed apart from the addition and removal of speculations from non-registerred edittors. | 0 |
"
wish it would mention the hardships of founding and keeping the city alive, and the burning of the capital building, how the 1st burned to the ground, and how hard it was to build such a building in the 1930's. I wish it would describe Bismarck today but then again that should be in the culture section.) As you scroll down you see ugly pictures that are sparingly used and a wreck that is supposed to be describing the climate of Bismarck
I'm sorry, but this is what would be called ""unencyclopedic"" here. We don't want emotive descriptions of places. We want neutral ones - see WP:NPOV - as if written by someone who neither likes nor dislikes the place. Imagine Bismarck as a city in Siberia you have no interest in. You have no opinion about its culture or its climate, or how hard anyone might have worked to build it. Write about it from that viewpoint. " | 0 |
block evasion and disruptive editing | 0 |
gen xer here
-
to me everyone is gonna have an oppinon on this subject so here is mine people born from 1964 to 1981 are gen xers gen y starts in 1982.it just seems logical to me. me im born in 1977 i definetly consider myself a gen xer because all my teen years were spend in the early and mid ninties when grunge and alternative music ruled the music scene.i mean when i started high school people were still listening to winger and warrant for god sake by my second year everybody had flannel shirts and riped jeans and were listening to pearl jam and gangster rap.if you were gonna snip a couple of years off the gen i would not snip 80 or 81 i would snip 64 and 65. | 0 |
Hey would you like to bearback...with me...hmm... | 0 |
"
Parody account
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Reaped_Eternally&action;=edit&redlink;=1 Emperor " | 0 |
"
Mr.Z-man did reply about toolserver migration issues a while back, by linking an email thread. I'm not sure where things stand now. Maybe the content of that thread is still up-to-date in Mr.Z-man's mind. I've asked about this to Maggie on how to ""escalate"" to receive more support. " | 0 |
Pretty sure that's you saying it's not your fault. Additionally, had you fully read my comment, you would have noticed that I only reverted one of your two reverts since the other was already buried too deep in the history to recover. | 0 |
"
Bot acting in a way that confuses me
Mr.Z-bot just reported at AIV because he ""Tripped filter 139 (details)."" Not sure how this is a problem, since the user wasn't able to do anything of vandalism or otherwise problematic, because he was prevented from so doing by the filter. Is there a good reason why this would be reported? Not challenging you: I just don't know what this is, so I'd like to understand. " | 0 |
"
Juniors
Thanks for the kind words. Your own work is much appreciated. Hope you and your family had a great Christmas.
Notability
Hi Dudesleeper,
thaught you may be able to help me with this, i need to know if a player for example playing for Hyde F.C. has never played a fully professional game and he then appears in the FA Cup 1st round proper for Hyde FC, does he deserve a page because he has made an appearence in a fully professional competition.
Cheers Taylor
I believe that's enough to establish notability, yes, unless something has changed that I don't know about. - talk
Categories
Hi again Dudesleeper,
Sorry to bother you again but there is another thing i need to ask you......
I have the Category Category:Hyde United F.C. players
, but the club has changed its name at the start of the season to Hyde F.C. so i want to know how can i make a new category called Hyde F.C. players and make the Hyde United players category non existant.
Cheers
Taylor
The out on loan bit of Blackpool FC
Hi Dudesleeper, i'm sure danny Coids loan to Rotherham has expired 12 days ago, heres proof http://www.themillers.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10360~2267801,00.html which is why I deleted that line out of the section.
Ron_Davies_(footballer_born_1942)
Hi, I've seen your NPOV tag from May 2010 on the above article. You were 100% right in my opinion, and no-one else had challeneged. So I have done a massive cutting job on it. If you have the time then please could you review it and see if the NPOV tag can now be removed. I'm about to add a citations tag! Thanks -
Howie Carr Show
I had created a section to discuss 'Notable guests' on the Talk Page - wish you could have used that rather than engage in a potential 3R.
Burnley
I've reverted your change to Burnley as it was obvious vandalism, which seems odd for a user of your experience. Are we in a bad mood today?
Thanks for reverting that back again. FYI I’ve not decided that all geographic articles should list any football clubs in the area in the lead section. However, it does seem to be customary to mention the most notable things about the place. As far as I am aware the only reason the average person alive today would even know of Burnley’s existence is Burnley FC. It was in a nice sentence about what the town was probably most famous for, but someone decided to ‘improve’ it.
Notification: changes to ""Mark my edits as minor by default"" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled ""Mark all edits minor by default"", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.
For well-established users such as yourself there is '''[[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_78#Preference_to_mark_all_edits_minor_by_def | 0 |
i didn't say that you don't have the right to call yourself Macedonian, I just say that this creates lifetime problems with the non-
Macedonian (nation) Macedonians (state) populations within your country and causes them to be called minorities and causes problems
with Macedonian (region) Greeks who also are taught in their (rewritten?) history that are Macedonians (ancient nation), just because they are speaking the same language (I'm not sure about that, but if we still don't know the language of Alexander then it is very dangarous to fight over whether the name of his nation, at least Hitler we know that was German). Don't you understand that you will always have an enemy (Greece) and one inside your country (non Macedonian nation minorities) and all the consiquenses of that for a new country? Why don't you chose a non-nation name for your state and keep the Macedonian nationality. Is nationalism the flag for your new country? GO and make HISTORY MACEDONIANS you have all your future ahead, show to all stupid nationalist Greeks, Bulgarians and Albanians what a conemporary county is and how much you have learned from your recent past about how old-fashioned and stupid
nationalism is. Conquer the world culturaly and wellcome whoever wants to join you. Be a prototype for the world, havbev your golden era ahead and forthcoming instead of 2000 years ago, take the example of Italy (no reference to Romans) and Greece (reference to Hellens), most people would love to move to advanced Italy , none to corrupted and underdeveloped Greece. | 0 |
|listas = Gough, Kelly | 0 |
"
Nope. This content edit to the article was not merely ""aggressive biased editing"", it was in fact nothing short of POV-driven vandalism. Sarah777, when making that edit, clearly knew she was falsifying the contents of the page. She knew that the term ""B.I."" in fact does include Ireland, in the usage of the English-speaking world at large, and that this meaning is the topic of that article. Of course, she doesn't want the world to be that way, but she know that it actually is that way. Changing an article in order to make it conform to the way you want the world to be rather than to the way you know the world actually is, is vandalism, period.
This together with on the associated talk page, which clearly is biased, aggressive rhetoric. ☼ " | 0 |
It IS true, so shut up and watch the show, why don't ya? Bakutrix | 0 |
nobody knows if its true they just did a thing on the history channel and they thought it was true so I dont know. | 0 |
So yeah, I've been like banned or something for 2 days. ( You take editing too seriously. What is it with you people? You're all facts, no heart. So when was the last time you went outside and contributed to the real world? | 0 |
(And how would you know what I've been writing elsewhere if you are NOT trolling?) | 0 |
Old AfD multi|page=List of San Francisco Ballet 2012 repertory|date=24 January 2012|result=keep}}
{{ | 0 |
Obsessed with trying to degrade people
Elonka Dunin obviously has some personal vendetta and is obsessed with trying to degrade the image of Antonia Bennett. Very Childish! Steve P. | 0 |
Wolfpuss
I think her most recent comment is pretty much 100% sarcasm; she doesn't really want suggestions as far as I can tell. - | 0 |
I created the Article. | 0 |
"
I do not defend the present title. I think that it would be more accurate as ""Prince Ernst August of Hanover (born 1954)"". I do not feel strongly enough about the matter to make a fuss. " | 0 |
Ny Teknik is reliable until provent it is non reliable. You must ask about its reliability. Until then, it is reliable.79.6.145.208 | 0 |
"
You can't have it both ways. You're either an encyclopedic website that seeks to be factual and informative while minimizing speculation or you're a fansite. Either way, it's not suitable for inclusion. For example, if your site is a community run information site, then it should not be included under the In general, any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article here would have once it becomes an example of brilliant prose guideline. Your Wiki won't provide information we don't already have or will have in the future if its just a community info site. However, if it trades in information that we won't be adding, such as speculation, theories, spoilers, because of Wikipedia guidelines on such material, then we should not be posting your sites for the reasons discussed above. It is not the case of making a link between encyclopedias, but between an encyclopedia and one particular fansite.
Further, the two Wikis you mention aren't even major fansites, when the guideline specifically states: Fan sites: On articles about topics with many fansites, including a link to one major fansite is appropriate, marking the link as such. In extreme cases, a link to a web directory of fansites can replace this link. We already have the major AND official forum: The Fuselage. If you'd like to add a link to a directory of Lost fansites, be my guest... but inclusion of either Wiki alone (instead of a list) is preferential treatment of minor fansites, since there are certainly other, larger, more popular fansites (Lost-media, Lost-tv, for example). Certainly, if we were to start adding fansites at random, we'd have to begin there and with others, like a link to TWOP's reviews and forums. The best course of action if you believe these sites simply must be linked to is for you to make a list of fansites and include a link to that directory, which is how WP:EL says to proceed.
As for removing the disclaimer, its not going anywhere. The disclaimer was put there specifically because we'd have people posting each and every fansite they dreamed up as official sites when they weren't. Lost is an example of a show wherein Wikipedia guidelines and policies are repeatedly ignored by the editing community, so the long-term editors have had to be very diligent in monitoring this page. This is an outgrowth of that, and has for the most part helped a lot. Moreover, there is no ""freebie"" section for links. All links listed there are official sources except IMDB, which is used almost without exception. The same list of reasons I mentioned above for IMDB, including the fact that IMDB is a featured part of the standard TV Infobox, clearly do not apply to these Wikis nor any other site people have been trying to add (Mr. Clucks, 4815162342, etc.)
Finally, I will agree with you that the list of links for all the individual networks is redundant, and should be chopped down or moved to Airdates of Lost as a link for the country/network listed there. " | 0 |
"
Where I say ""the provided rationale is not actionnable."" " | 0 |
so
So with all this hectic anti-assyrianism going on, I was just randomly wondering whats up with you? Last I heard you were in Greece, right? You said that you wanted to work in diplomacy between the US and the Greeks so I heard, or something like that. Hows that going? Do u live in the US? | 0 |
"
Peter Blaise says: As of 2007-01-15, http://www.simplica.eu/ seems to be gone, with no tool download, only last referenced in Google cache as of 2007-12. If someone else has references to tools that build, analyze, repair, and report on LDPA databases, please report on them and add them to a new section on the article page, perhaps called ""Tools and Utilities"" Peter Blaise
" | 0 |
What then of the almanac function of lists? I know I have seen reference to some such role wikipedia plays in that manner. | 0 |
Well i don't know what or unfortanetly i know where i got it, its from here: | 0 |
"
Facts box""in office""?
Okay, seriously, why does this article have a facts box in the style of a politician? ""Succeeded by"", ""incumbent"", andmost notably""in office""...that doesn't feel right for this article. Leno is a comedian and talk-show host, not a senator. I vote for changing this to something more suitable and commonly-used, like those seen on the majority of show biz folks' pages." | 0 |
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (talk) | 0 |
Question Mark?
I'm Very Sorry.
I didn't know that i was being disruptive, I thought that you had vandalised.
I'm sorry!
Soory -(
xxx | 0 |
I love this LIBERALS DELIBERATELY leave info out about their heroes, but rush to judgement about conservatives.This DarkGray dufas is trying to BLOCKADE the truth.
And the person who was FOOLISH enough to actually find a reliable source doesn't realize wiki has NO intention of posting anything harmful to their icons...reliable sources or not.
The liberals that control wikipedia are like the Old Soviet Style MOBSTERS.162.216.14.26 | 0 |
"
On http://www.meanspeed.com, under the side bar ""Graphs"" there are sets of examples: Under BPM List, there are over 10,000 examples of the precise speeds of popular music pieces from every genre. Under Charts, there are 144 visual examples in histogram form.
Moreover, on the sidebar, if you choose ""Blog,"" the archived materialseasily navigableyield over 1,000 examples. Methodology is included in detail for testing yourself, which is *most* encouraged.
Keep in mind, I am aware that the navigation system on meanspeed.com is not the best-so I hired the besta webmaster from Seattle who began work on a much friendlier, easy to navigate and understand sitea project he begun on Thanksgiving and will be up in a month. The meanspeed.com that appears now is a considerable improvement over the original August 2004 version, as many have noted. What I am calling Meanspeed 2.0 will be that much better.
And OF COURSE, love to hook up with iTunes. So said, the site is well, documented, I have letters from Dr. Manfred Clynes calling what a did a ""GOLD MINE OF DATA."" I want others to use it to control speed when they want. I'd like to get credit for the discovery. So said, it is a pattern in natureI did not invent it, did not make a gadget out of itit simply is. I long for the day when people see that the ""theory"" is as try as ""water is wet"" or ""the sun rises in the east.""
Again, thank you for your consideration, and please send any suggestions to meanspeed@gmail.com.
Sincerely
Ian Andrew Schneider" | 0 |
Be advised that one of the plot edits you made was also incorrect. If you look at the scene closely where the elder survivor gives Dr. Oakes one of his supplies, it's not bread but an orange. This is how it is mentioned in the script, which I'd love to cite online, but is only available in my hands at the moment. And no, I'm not going to scan it in and put it online so you can link to it, because that's illegal. | 0 |
Is dat sum fried chickens? | 0 |
"
""Original research""
Ref this removal, this does not constitute original research. I did not say that the first article was created then (I have no access to any proof one existed before or not, and am not assuming anything so far). I stated that this article was created then, with the appropriate proof. We surely do not need third party sourcing for interpreting our own software?. If the apparent need for this piece of article text to exist is to refute claims made against Wikipedia, then including the date of this article being created is going to be quite pertinent to the reader, don't you think? " | 0 |
You're not paying attention. The court in Malnak stated all of this. There is absolutely no question that this is the authentic text. And if you looked at the link, you would see that it not only sets forth the text, it includes a scan of the actual pamphlet. This is a baseless reversion of reliably sourced material. | 0 |
I could not disagree more with the above assertion as it is made without benefit of factual evidence or an understanding of the community. | 0 |
The article had a great deal of work in the first place! As far as I am able to determine, it appears to have been deleted by a British editor out of national arrogance or political hostility. | 0 |
"
Take your time
Please take your time. Just one more pshyco communard off of wikipedia. I know you will revert this though. But why do you revert? To hide the truth? To censor stuff you don't want people to think? Go ahead, keep up the Totalitarian spirit. But Bishonen, please take your time on your ""Wiki-break"". Crack open a book. Drink some ""fabulous"" coffee. But feel free not to express your Communistic Ideas on Wikipedia for a while. I am afraid to say however, that you can say whatever you want, because I am a strong believer in Democracy.
" | 0 |
Hm.. can we wave this? | 0 |
.
I completely agree with the guy that says homophobia describes something different, fear of gays. Even though the dictionary defines it as something different, it's silly to categorize every type of notion against gay people into one word | 0 |
GOOD FOR YOU
I was hoping to find an email for you, but couldn't. Thus, I will comment here. You look pretty young for being so sharp (just kidding). I am an EE, as well as an attorney, but am an old fart. I was banished from Wiki as a result of Ted Frank's false statements and relentless (and false) attacks on me for what? Because he disagreed with my edits. He also defamed me on WIkipedia, and threatened my husband and me with litigation outside of Wikipedia - the threat was wholly frivolous and a bully tactic. We told him to go for it, and we would make him look like a fool.
We never heard from him again. For a right wing nutcase so against litigation, he surely is quick to make bogus threats of litigation. Interesting.
I tried to explain to the Wiki clique what actually happened, but got nowhere. That was shortly before the corporate shills editing Wikipedia were discovered.
Anyway, I am very glad to see someone held Frank to account, and protested his unbelievably biased edits. I had never before encountered an AEI staff, and dont ever want to again.
He is a pompous jerk, ruthless, mean and stoops to any level to smear anyone who does not promote his agenda. My experience with Wikipedia was such that I would never want to edit again. Not worth it. But good for you and some who are able to expose those kind of editors for who they are.
Maybe there is hope for Wikipedia, but I would not hold my breath. | 0 |
To reiterate, please use edit summaries. Cheers! | 0 |
I know that, I mean the three characters shown in Bobobo's assumption. | 0 |
consume your own curry scented salty lassie. Thank you please! | 0 |
Thanks for the Barnstar! It's great when people make comments about my username! ) | 0 |
I'm back!
It's been MONTHS since you posted on my talk page, Free Dixiercat!....well my block was temporary but after that, I had trouble with wikipedia...I could log in, but I couldn't make it past 1 page before the internet went all screwy...But I'm back! And I'm back (almost) full force! I plan to abide by wiki rules as much as I can and the person(s) who had a problem with my articles back in February has been revealed to be a sock puppet...
Peace out! | 0 |
I did try to assume good faith to begin with here, but the users history of wikilawyering (as listed above), culminating with the proof - in the creation of M I A - that their desperation to delete/rename this album is purely rooted in the fact that the article could possibly be confused with an article they have an interest in, caused me to lose it.
Ironically, changing the title of this article to MIA will immediately cause separate confusion - with another band, called MIA.. | 0 |
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - | 0 |
Oh my god, some genres on pages don't have sources. I've seen it w/ my own 2 eyes. Have u? | 0 |
(Diamonds being used to fuel my Kreblakistani laser beam to extertiminate the white house) | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.