Conditional Breakdown Report
Scope
- Source analysis run:
20260526_v2_official20_plus_c2patch_plus_subgroupconditionalrepair_merged49 - Family analyzed:
conditional_dependency_structure - Excluded models:
cdtd, codi, goggle - Included models:
11from the frozen README roster - Deduplicated dataset-model panels:
510 - Conditional query rows used:
25108
Canonical and derived views
- Canonical score:
mean(dependency_strength_similarity, direction_consistency, slice_level_consistency) - Derived subgroup score:
mean(direction_consistency, slice_level_consistency) - The derived score is not a replacement for the frozen contract; it isolates the two subgroup-sensitive conditional branches for paper analysis.
Main findings
RealTabFormeris the strongest model on the subgroup-facing conditional view with mean derived subgroup score0.748.- Canonically,
RealTabFormerleads the full conditional family with mean conditional score0.671. TVAEis the most direction-heavy model (direction minus slice =0.167), whileRealTabFormeris the most slice-heavy (0.070).TVAEshows the largest strength-to-subgroup drop risk: its dependency-strength mean exceeds its subgroup-facing mean by-0.197.- Dataset difficulty is uneven:
n9is hardest on the subgroup-facing conditional view (0.000mean across models), whilen11is easiest (1.000).
Files to use first
figures/conditional_subgroup_tradeoff_scatter_main.pdffigures/conditional_strength_vs_subgroup_bridge.pdffigures/conditional_branch_dumbbell_main.pdftables/conditional_model_summary_generated.texdata/model_summary.csv
README compliance note
- All plotted models are restricted to the frozen README roster with fixed colors.
- Scatter plots now use legends instead of point-side model labels, matching the README figure annotation rule.
- Model order is fixed globally instead of being re-sorted by score.
Prefix note
- Prefix coverage summary rows:
33 - Prefix-level figures are exported for
c / m / nslice checks, but the paper-facing core keeps the full deduplicated panel.