|
Download cases/case08/task.md from Tauben/PhysClosureBench: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 5.09 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case08/task.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/cases/case08/task.md
-
curl -L -o task.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case08/task.md
5.09 kB
| # Timing information in molecular photoionization | |
| ## Background | |
| Photoelectron wave packets emitted from the two regions of an aligned | |
| diatomic ion can interfere. When a short, high-energy pulse propagates across | |
| the molecule, relative emission timing may be encoded in the final | |
| molecule-frame signal. The same angular structure can also be reshaped by the | |
| state-dependent photoionization response, so a numerical shift is not by | |
| itself a timing measurement. | |
| ## Research problem | |
| Using the physical model below, determine what quantitative information about | |
| the relative birth time of the two emitted wave packets, if any, can be | |
| reliably inferred from the final photoelectron signal. Apply the investigation | |
| to the lowest symmetric and first antisymmetric initial states and determine | |
| whether the evidence supports an initial-state dependence. | |
| How the inference is constructed and substantiated is for you to decide. | |
| Establish its physical meaning and identifiability from the computed evidence | |
| rather than assuming in advance that a particular angular feature is a valid | |
| clock. | |
| ## Physical inputs | |
| Use atomic units and the two-dimensional soft-core $\mathrm H_2^+$ model below. | |
| Work in coordinates $(z,x)$ with nuclei at $z=\pm R/2$, the molecular and | |
| pulse-propagation axes along $\hat{\mathbf z}$, and pulse polarization along | |
| $\hat{\mathbf x}$. The field-free potential is | |
| $$ | |
| V(z,x)=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{(z-R/2)^2+x^2+a}} | |
| -\frac{1}{\sqrt{(z+R/2)^2+x^2+a}}. | |
| $$ | |
| Use $R=2$ and $a=4.33$. The two initial states are the lowest symmetric and | |
| first antisymmetric eigenstates of this same field-free Hamiltonian. | |
| Retain propagation of the pulse across the molecule. Its finite-support vector | |
| potential is | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{aligned} | |
| \mathbf A(z,t)={}&A_0 | |
| \sin^2\!\left[\frac{\omega_e}{c}(z+a_0)-\omega_e t\right] | |
| \sin\!\left[\frac{\omega}{c}(z-ct)\right]\hat{\mathbf x}\\ | |
| &\times\left[ | |
| \theta_H\!\left(z-ct+\frac{\pi c}{\omega_e}+a_0\right) | |
| -\theta_H(z-ct+a_0) | |
| \right], | |
| \end{aligned} | |
| $$ | |
| where $\omega_e=\omega/(2N_{\mathrm{cyc}})$. Use | |
| | Quantity | Value | | |
| |---|---:| | |
| | Peak intensity | $1.0\times10^{14}\ \mathrm{W\,cm^{-2}}$ | | |
| | Central wavelength | $5$ nm | | |
| | Pulse duration | $N_{\mathrm{cyc}}=30$ cycles | | |
| | Initial pulse displacement | $a_0=10$ a.u. | | |
| Determine $\omega$ and $A_0$ using conventions consistent with a standard | |
| velocity-gauge nondipole TDSE. State the Fourier, momentum-axis, angular and | |
| delay-sign conventions used. | |
| ## Method boundary | |
| A standard velocity-gauge nondipole TDSE treatment is required. All | |
| task-specific analytical, numerical and evidential constructions are yours. | |
| Any comparison between the two initial states must use the same operational | |
| definition or demonstrate that the definitions are equivalent. | |
| You are responsible for establishing that the computed evidence is | |
| sufficiently reliable and physically discriminating for the conclusion made. | |
| No numerical implementation, post-processing recipe, display convention or | |
| validation procedure is prescribed. Absolute photoelectron yield is not a | |
| grading target. | |
| ## Submission | |
| Submit one self-contained scientific report and an offline reproduction | |
| package containing the derivation, executable code, reconstructible final | |
| photoelectron data for both initial states, the data underlying any | |
| quantitative timing claim, a provenance note listing every offline source or software document actually consulted and the method basis for items supplied from general knowledge, and concise run and | |
| environment information. The choice and number of figures are yours. No fixed | |
| file tree, filename scheme, complete exploratory history or examiner-selected | |
| diagnostic is required. | |
| The active examination resources and limits are defined in the companion | |
| `resource_limits.json`. All retained production calculations must run | |
| within that fixed allocation and active wall time. More expensive modelling | |
| does not receive additional credit. | |
| ## Reference and integrity policy | |
| This examination is conducted without network access or live literature | |
| retrieval. You may rely on your existing general scientific knowledge and, if any are | |
| explicitly supplied with the examination, on those offline materials or | |
| software documentation. Record every such source actually consulted. For formulas, | |
| methods, constants, or conventions used from general knowledge rather than a | |
| consulted source, state enough of the method basis, definition, value, units, | |
| and convention to make the calculation auditable; do not invent a citation. | |
| You are not required to identify or prove a publication date or to retrieve | |
| literature during the examination. | |
| The hidden target article and its identifying metadata, figures or captions, | |
| supplementary material, author code or data, target-specific reproduction | |
| code, solution or scoring material, online solutions, and worked | |
| reproductions of this case must not be used. All submitted scientific figures | |
| and numerical data must be generated by your own implementation of the stated | |
| problem. | |
| See [submission requirements](../../submission_requirements.md) for the common submission entry points. | |