Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA7591	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndirect the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.0 billion as of december 31 , 2014 . 17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 included $ 2454 million , net of $ 1210 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2486 million , net of $ 1092 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2014 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 508</td><td>$ 253</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>484</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>429</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>356</td><td>224</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019</td><td>323</td><td>210</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1625</td><td>745</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 3725</td><td>$ 1927</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-407 ( 407 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1520</td></tr></table> approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 593 million in 2014 , $ 618 million in 2013 , and $ 631 million in 2012 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 7% ( 7 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2014 . because of the uncertainty .\nQuestion: what are minimum payments of operating leases?\nAnswer: 3725.0\nQuestion: what are minimum payments of capital leases?\nAnswer: 1927.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 5652.0\nQuestion: what is the value of capital leases?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1927.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5168	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npositions and collateral of the defaulting firm at each respective clearing organization , and taking into account any cross-margining loss sharing payments , any of the participating clearing organizations has a remaining liquidating surplus , and any other participating clearing organization has a remaining liquidating deficit , any additional surplus from the liquidation would be shared with the other clearing house to the extent that it has a remaining liquidating deficit . any remaining surplus funds would be passed to the bankruptcy trustee . mf global bankruptcy trust . the company provided a $ 550.0 million financial guarantee to the bankruptcy trustee of mf global to accelerate the distribution of funds to mf global customers . in the event that the trustee distributed more property in the second or third interim distributions than was permitted by the bankruptcy code and cftc regulations , the company will make a cash payment to the trustee for the amount of the erroneous distribution or distributions up to $ 550.0 million in the aggregate . a payment will only be made after the trustee makes reasonable efforts to collect the property erroneously distributed to the customer ( s ) . if a payment is made by the company , the company may have the right to seek reimbursement of the erroneously distributed property from the applicable customer ( s ) . the guarantee does not cover distributions made by the trustee to customers on the basis of their claims filed in the bankruptcy . because the trustee has now made payments to nearly all customers on the basis of their claims , the company believes that the likelihood of payment to the trustee is very remote . as a result , the guarantee liability is estimated to be immaterial at december 31 , 2012 . family farmer and rancher protection fund . in april 2012 , the company established the family farmer and rancher protection fund ( the fund ) . the fund is designed to provide payments , up to certain maximum levels , to family farmers , ranchers and other agricultural industry participants who use cme group agricultural products and who suffer losses to their segregated account balances due to their cme clearing member becoming insolvent . under the terms of the fund , farmers and ranchers are eligible for up to $ 25000 per participant . farming and ranching cooperatives are eligible for up to $ 100000 per cooperative . the fund has an aggregate maximum payment amount of $ 100.0 million . if payments to participants were to exceed this amount , payments would be pro-rated . clearing members and customers must register in advance with the company and provide certain documentation in order to substantiate their eligibility . peregrine financial group , inc . ( pfg ) filed for bankruptcy protection on july 10 , 2012 . pfg was not one of cme 2019s clearing members and its customers had not registered for the fund . accordingly , they were not technically eligible for payments from the fund . however , because the fund was newly implemented and because pfg 2019s customers included many agricultural industry participants for whom the program was designed , the company decided to waive certain terms and conditions of the fund , solely in connection with the pfg bankruptcy , so that otherwise eligible family farmers , ranchers and agricultural cooperatives could apply for and receive benefits from cme . based on the number of such pfg customers who applied and the estimated size of their claims , the company has recorded a liability in the amount of $ 2.1 million at december 31 , 2012 . 16 . redeemable non-controlling interest the following summarizes the changes in redeemable non-controlling interest for the years presented . non- controlling interests that do not contain redemption features are presented in the statements of equity. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contribution by dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>675.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>distribution to dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-607.5 ( 607.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allocation of stock-based compensation</td><td>2014</td><td>0.1</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>10.5</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td></tr></table> contribution by dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 675.0 distribution to dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 ( 607.5 ) allocation of stock- compensation . . . . 2014 0.1 2014 total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non- controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . 10.5 2.1 0.6 balance at december 31 . . . . . . . . . $ 80.8 $ 70.3 $ 68.1 .\nQuestion: what is the net change in balance of non-controlling interests from 2011 to 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "10.5" } ]
CONVFINQA2555	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 . redeemable noncontrolling interests - continued redeemable noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets are recorded at the greater of their carrying amount or redemption value at the end of each reporting period . changes in the value from period to period are charged to 201cadditional capital 201d in our consolidated statements of changes in equity . below is a table summarizing the activity of redeemable noncontrolling interests . ( amounts in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>$ 1251628</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>55228</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>distributions</td><td>-53515 ( 53515 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>conversion of class a units into common shares at redemption value</td><td>-126764 ( 126764 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjustment to carry redeemable class a units at redemption value</td><td>191826</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>redemption of series d-12 redeemable units</td><td>-13000 ( 13000 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other net</td><td>22571</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>1327974</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net income</td><td>55912</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>distributions</td><td>-50865 ( 50865 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>conversion of class a units into common shares at redemption value</td><td>-64830 ( 64830 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>adjustment to carry redeemable class a units at redemption value</td><td>-98092 ( 98092 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>redemption of series d-11 redeemable units</td><td>-28000 ( 28000 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other net</td><td>18578</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 1160677</td></tr></table> redeemable noncontrolling interests exclude our series g convertible preferred units and series d-13 cumulative redeemable preferred units , as they are accounted for as liabilities in accordance with asc 480 , distinguishing liabilities and equity , because of their possible settlement by issuing a variable number of vornado common shares . accordingly , the fair value of these units is included as a component of 201cother liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets and aggregated $ 54865000 and $ 55097000 as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of redeemable noncontrolling interests from 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: 76346.0\nQuestion: what was that change over the 2009 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.061" } ]
CONVFINQA196	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nleveraged performance units during the year ended may 31 , 2015 , certain executives were granted performance units that we refer to as 201cleveraged performance units , 201d or 201clpus . 201d lpus contain a market condition based on our relative stock price growth over a three-year performance period . the lpus contain a minimum threshold performance which , if not met , would result in no payout . the lpus also contain a maximum award opportunity set as a fixed dollar and fixed number of shares . after the three-year performance period , which concluded in october 2017 , one-third of the earned units converted to unrestricted common stock . the remaining two-thirds converted to restricted stock that will vest in equal installments on each of the first two anniversaries of the conversion date . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the lpus , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the lpu award . the following table summarizes the changes in unvested restricted stock and performance awards for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period and for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested at may 31 2014</td><td>1754</td><td>$ 22.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>954</td><td>36.21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-648 ( 648 )</td><td>23.17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>27.03</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested at may 31 2015</td><td>1848</td><td>28.97</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>461</td><td>57.04</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-633 ( 633 )</td><td>27.55</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td><td>34.69</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested at may 31 2016</td><td>1606</td><td>37.25</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>348</td><td>74.26</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested</td><td>-639 ( 639 )</td><td>31.38</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>45.27</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>unvested at december 31 2016</td><td>1263</td><td>49.55</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>granted</td><td>899</td><td>79.79</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>vested</td><td>-858 ( 858 )</td><td>39.26</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-78 ( 78 )</td><td>59.56</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>unvested at december 31 2017</td><td>1226</td><td>$ 78.29</td></tr></table> the total fair value of restricted stock and performance awards vested was $ 33.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , $ 20.0 million for the 2016 fiscal transition period and $ 17.4 million and $ 15.0 million , respectively , for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 . for restricted stock and performance awards , we recognized compensation expense of $ 35.2 million for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , $ 17.2 million for the 2016 fiscal transition period and $ 28.8 million and $ 19.8 million , respectively , for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was $ 46.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock and performance awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years . our restricted stock and performance award plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . stock options stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and have a term of ten years . stock options granted before the year ended may 31 , 2015 vest in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . stock options granted during the year ended may 31 , 2015 and thereafter vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date . our stock option plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . global payments inc . \| 2017 form 10-k annual report 2013 91 .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the total fair value of restricted stock and performance awards vested between 2016 and 2017?\nAnswer: 13.7\nQuestion: now as a percentage of the original value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.685" } ]
CONVFINQA1157	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n58\| \| duke realty corporation annual report 2009 we recognized a loss of $ 1.1 million upon acquisition , which represents the difference between the fair value of the recognized assets and the carrying value of our pre-existing equity interest . the acquisition date fair value of the net recognized assets as compared to the acquisition date carrying value of our outstanding advances and accrued interest , as well as the acquisition date carrying value of our pre-existing equity interests , is shown as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>net fair value of acquired assets and liabilities</td><td>$ 206852</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>less advances to acquired entities eliminated upon consolidation</td><td>-173006 ( 173006 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less acquisition date carrying value of equity in acquired entities</td><td>-34908 ( 34908 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loss on business combination</td><td>$ -1062 ( 1062 )</td></tr></table> since april 1 , 2009 , the results of operations for both acquired entities have been included in continuing operations in our consolidated financial statements . due to our significant pre-existing ownership and financing positions in the two acquired entities , the inclusion of their results of operations did not have a material effect on our operating income . acquisitions we acquired income producing real estate related assets of $ 32.1 million , $ 60.5 million and $ 219.9 million in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . in december 2007 , in order to further establish our property positions around strategic port locations , we purchased a portfolio of five industrial buildings in seattle , virginia and houston , as well as approximately 161 acres of undeveloped land and a 12-acre container storage facility in houston . the total price was $ 89.7 million and was financed in part through assumption of secured debt that had a fair value of $ 34.3 million . of the total purchase price , $ 64.1 million was allocated to in-service real estate assets , $ 20.0 million was allocated to undeveloped land and the container storage facility , $ 5.4 million was allocated to lease related intangible assets , and the remaining amount was allocated to acquired working capital related assets and liabilities . the results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements . all other acquisitions were not individually material . dispositions we disposed of income producing real estate related assets with gross proceeds of $ 267.0 million , $ 426.2 million and $ 590.4 million in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we sold five properties in 2009 and seven properties in 2008 to an unconsolidated joint venture . the gross proceeds totaled $ 84.3 million and $ 226.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . in march 2007 , as part of our capital recycling program , we sold a portfolio of eight suburban office properties totaling 894000 square feet in the cleveland market . the sales price totaled $ 140.4 million , of which we received net proceeds of $ 139.3 million . we also sold a portfolio of twelve flex and light industrial properties in july 2007 , totaling 865000 square feet in the st . louis market , for a sales price of $ 65.0 million , of which we received net proceeds of $ 64.2 million . all other dispositions were not individually material . ( 4 ) related party transactions we provide property management , leasing , construction and other tenant related services to unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , we earned management fees of $ 8.4 million , $ 7.8 million and $ 7.1 million , leasing fees of $ 4.2 million , $ 2.8 million and $ 4.2 million and construction and development fees of $ 10.2 million , $ 12.7 million and $ 13.1 million from these companies . we recorded these fees based on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of .\nQuestion: what was the value of advances to acquired entities eliminated upon consolidation?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "173006.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1190	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nissuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 8895570 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 385.1 million pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 1 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2007</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 43.30</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 449.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2007</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 44.16</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 322.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2007</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 44.20</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total fourth quarter</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 43.27</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) issuer repurchases pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 . under this program , our management was authorized through february 2008 to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we typically made purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allow us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . subsequent to december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 4.3 million shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 163.7 million pursuant to this program . in february 2008 , our board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program , pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to an additional $ 1.5 billion of our class a common stock . purchases under this stock repurchase program are subject to us having available cash to fund repurchases , as further described in item 1a of this annual report under the caption 201crisk factors 2014we anticipate that we may need additional financing to fund our stock repurchase programs , to refinance our existing indebtedness and to fund future growth and expansion initiatives 201d and item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources . 201d .\nQuestion: what is the aggregate value of shares repurchased, in millions?\nAnswer: 163700000.0\nQuestion: what is the amount of shares repurchased that quarter, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4300000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA809	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company granted 1020 performance shares . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2009</td><td>116677</td><td>$ 280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>134245</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-34630 ( 34630 )</td><td>257</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-19830 ( 19830 )</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2010</td><td>196462</td><td>283</td></tr></table> the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the expense of class a common stock issued to non-executive directors in 2010?\nAnswer: 2.4\nQuestion: what is that times 1000000?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2400000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6659	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) note 17 . commitments at december 31 , 2008 , the company had the following future minimum payments due under non-cancelable agreements : capital leases operating leases sponsorship , licensing & . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td><td>capital leases</td><td>operating leases</td><td>sponsorship licensing & other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 372320</td><td>$ 8435</td><td>$ 40327</td><td>$ 323558</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>140659</td><td>2758</td><td>18403</td><td>119498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>80823</td><td>1978</td><td>11555</td><td>67290</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>50099</td><td>1819</td><td>9271</td><td>39009</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>50012</td><td>36837</td><td>7062</td><td>6113</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21292</td><td>2014</td><td>19380</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 715205</td><td>$ 51827</td><td>$ 105998</td><td>$ 557380</td></tr></table> included in the table above are capital leases with imputed interest expense of $ 9483 and a net present value of minimum lease payments of $ 42343 . in addition , at december 31 , 2008 , $ 92300 of the future minimum payments in the table above for leases , sponsorship , licensing and other agreements was accrued . consolidated rental expense for the company 2019s office space , which is recognized on a straight line basis over the life of the lease , was approximately $ 42905 , $ 35614 and $ 31467 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . consolidated lease expense for automobiles , computer equipment and office equipment was $ 7694 , $ 7679 and $ 8419 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . in january 2003 , mastercard purchased a building in kansas city , missouri for approximately $ 23572 . the building is a co-processing data center which replaced a back-up data center in lake success , new york . during 2003 , mastercard entered into agreements with the city of kansas city for ( i ) the sale-leaseback of the building and related equipment which totaled $ 36382 and ( ii ) the purchase of municipal bonds for the same amount which have been classified as municipal bonds held-to-maturity . the agreements enabled mastercard to secure state and local financial benefits . no gain or loss was recorded in connection with the agreements . the leaseback has been accounted for as a capital lease as the agreement contains a bargain purchase option at the end of the ten-year lease term on april 1 , 2013 . the building and related equipment are being depreciated over their estimated economic life in accordance with the company 2019s policy . rent of $ 1819 is due annually and is equal to the interest due on the municipal bonds . the future minimum lease payments are $ 45781 and are included in the table above . a portion of the building was subleased to the original building owner for a five-year term with a renewal option . as of december 31 , 2008 , the future minimum sublease rental income is $ 4416 . note 18 . obligations under litigation settlements on october 27 , 2008 , mastercard and visa inc . ( 201cvisa 201d ) entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201cdiscover settlement 201d ) with discover financial services , inc . ( 201cdiscover 201d ) relating to the u.s . federal antitrust litigation amongst the parties . the discover settlement ended all litigation between the parties for a total of $ 2750000 . in july 2008 , mastercard and visa had entered into a judgment sharing agreement that allocated responsibility for any judgment or settlement of the discover action between the parties . accordingly , the mastercard share of the discover settlement was $ 862500 , which was paid to discover in november 2008 . in addition , in connection with the discover settlement , morgan stanley , discover 2019s former parent company , paid mastercard $ 35000 in november 2008 , pursuant to a separate agreement . the net impact of $ 827500 is included in litigation settlements for the year ended december 31 , 2008. .\nQuestion: what portion of total future minimum payments for capital leases is due in 2011?\nAnswer: 0.02447\nQuestion: what is the total rent expense for 2007 and 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "78519.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2192	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 2010</td><td>september 2011</td><td>september 2012</td><td>september 2013</td><td>september 2014</td><td>september 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 229</td><td>$ 170</td><td>$ 254</td><td>$ 294</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p information technology index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ 194</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones u.s . technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 134</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 183</td><td>$ 183</td></tr></table> apple inc . \| 2015 form 10-k \| 21 .\nQuestion: what was the value of apple inc in 2014?\nAnswer: 254.0\nQuestion: what was the initial investment amount?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "154.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8633	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( percents )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.00% ( 2.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.31</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>22.26</td><td>22.91</td><td>21.68</td></tr></table> pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and .\nQuestion: what was the value of shares repurchased in 2017?\nAnswer: 359.8\nQuestion: and in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "540.1" } ]
CONVFINQA4834	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2015 and 2014 was $ 1.5 billion and $ 1.3 billion . the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding foreign currency hedges at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 4.1 billion and $ 804 million . derivative instruments did not have a material impact on net earnings and comprehensive income during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . substantially all of our derivatives are designated for hedge accounting . see note 16 for more information on the fair value measurements related to our derivative instruments . recent accounting pronouncements 2013 in may 2014 , the fasb issued a new standard that will change the way we recognize revenue and significantly expand the disclosure requirements for revenue arrangements . on july 9 , 2015 , the fasb approved a one-year deferral of the effective date of the standard to 2018 for public companies , with an option that would permit companies to adopt the standard in 2017 . early adoption prior to 2017 is not permitted . the new standard may be adopted either retrospectively or on a modified retrospective basis whereby the new standard would be applied to new contracts and existing contracts with remaining performance obligations as of the effective date , with a cumulative catch-up adjustment recorded to beginning retained earnings at the effective date for existing contracts with remaining performance obligations . in addition , the fasb is contemplating making additional changes to certain elements of the new standard . we are currently evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by the new standard and the effect the standard is expected to have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures . as the new standard will supersede substantially all existing revenue guidance affecting us under gaap , it could impact revenue and cost recognition on thousands of contracts across all our business segments , in addition to our business processes and our information technology systems . as a result , our evaluation of the effect of the new standard will extend over future periods . in september 2015 , the fasb issued a new standard that simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to preliminary amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments . instead , adjustments will be recognized in the period in which the adjustments are determined , including the effect on earnings of any amounts that would have been recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date . we adopted the standard on january 1 , 2016 and will prospectively apply the standard to business combination adjustments identified after the date of adoption . in november 2015 , the fasb issued a new standard that simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities , as well as any related valuation allowance , be classified as noncurrent in our consolidated balance sheets . the standard is effective january 1 , 2017 , with early adoption permitted . the standard may be applied either prospectively from the date of adoption or retrospectively to all prior periods presented . we are currently evaluating when we will adopt the standard and the method of adoption . note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>310.3</td><td>316.8</td><td>320.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>4.4</td><td>5.6</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations</td><td>314.7</td><td>322.4</td><td>326.5</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 2.4 million stock options for the year ended december 31 , 2013 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market prices of our common stock during the respective periods . there were no anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014. .\nQuestion: what was the total weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2015, in millions?\nAnswer: 314.7\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014, also in millions?\nAnswer: 322.4\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-7.7" } ]
CONVFINQA10134	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see \"state and local rate regulation\" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see \"critical accounting estimates\" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see \"state and local rate regulation\" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .\nQuestion: what is the net revenue in 2007?\nAnswer: 991.1\nQuestion: what about in 2006?\nAnswer: 942.1\nQuestion: what is the net increase in net revenue from 2006 to 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "49.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10063	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis other income ( deductions ) changed from $ 47.6 million in 2002 to ( $ 36.0 million ) in 2003 primarily due to a decrease in \"miscellaneous - net\" as a result of a $ 107.7 million accrual in the second quarter of 2003 for the loss that would be associated with a final , non-appealable decision disallowing abeyed river bend plant costs . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more details regarding the river bend abeyed plant costs . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest and dividend income as a result of the implementation of sfas 143 . interest on long-term debt decreased from $ 462.0 million in 2002 to $ 433.5 million in 2003 primarily due to the redemption and refinancing of long-term debt . non-utility nuclear following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>4058</td><td>4001</td><td>3955</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average realized price per mwh</td><td>$ 41.26</td><td>$ 39.38</td><td>$ 40.07</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>32524</td><td>32379</td><td>29953</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td></tr></table> 2004 compared to 2003 the decrease in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 300.8 million to $ 245.0 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle that increased earnings in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . earnings before the cumulative effect of accounting change increased by $ 98.7 million primarily due to the following : 2022 lower operation and maintenance expenses , which decreased from $ 681.8 million in 2003 to $ 595.7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2003 in connection with the voluntary severance program ; 2022 higher revenues , which increased from $ 1.275 billion in 2003 to $ 1.342 billion in 2004 , primarily resulting from higher contract pricing . the addition of a support services contract for the cooper nuclear station and increased generation in 2004 due to power uprates completed in 2003 and fewer planned and unplanned outages in 2004 also contributed to the higher revenues ; and 2022 miscellaneous income resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant , as discussed in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . partially offsetting this increase were the following : 2022 higher income taxes , which increased from $ 88.6 million in 2003 to $ 142.6 million in 2004 ; and 2022 higher depreciation expense , which increased from $ 34.3 million in 2003 to $ 48.9 million in 2004 , due to additions to plant in service . 2003 compared to 2002 the increase in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 200.5 million to $ 300.8 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recognized in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . income before the cumulative effect of accounting change decreased by $ 54.2 million . the decrease was primarily due to $ 83.0 million ( $ 50.6 million net-of-tax ) of charges recorded in connection with the voluntary severance program . except for the effect of the voluntary severance program , operation and maintenance expenses in 2003 per mwh of generation were in line with 2002 operation and maintenance expenses. .\nQuestion: what is the change in earnings for non-utility nuclear from 2003 to 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-55.8" } ]
CONVFINQA3089	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncustomary conditions . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture . as of december 31 , 2008 , the joint venture has acquired seven properties from us and we received year-to-date net sale proceeds and financing distributions of approximately $ 251.6 million . in january 2008 , we sold a tract of land to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we hold a 50% ( 50 % ) equity interest and received a distribution , commensurate to our partner 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership interest , of approximately $ 38.3 million . in november 2008 , that unconsolidated joint venture entered a loan agreement with a consortium of banks and distributed a portion of the loan proceeds to us and our partner , with our share of the distribution totaling $ 20.4 million . uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 property investment ; 2022 recurring leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; 2022 opportunistic repurchases of outstanding debt ; and 2022 other contractual obligations . property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and we are limiting new development expenditures . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>recurring tenant improvements</td><td>$ 36885</td><td>$ 45296</td><td>$ 41895</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>recurring leasing costs</td><td>28205</td><td>32238</td><td>32983</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>9724</td><td>8402</td><td>8122</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>totals</td><td>$ 74814</td><td>$ 85936</td><td>$ 83000</td></tr></table> dividends and distributions in order to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes , we must currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our taxable income to shareholders . because depreciation is a non-cash expense , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 1.93 , $ 1.91 and $ 1.89 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute taxable earnings to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status . however , distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . in january 2009 , our board of directors resolved to decrease our annual dividend from $ 1.94 per share to $ 1.00 per share in order to retain additional cash to help meet our capital needs . we anticipate retaining additional cash of approximately $ 145.2 million per year , when compared to an annual dividend of $ 1.94 per share , as the result of this action . at december 31 , 2008 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. .\nQuestion: as of 2008, what percentage of the total recurring capital expenditures were associated with leasing costs?\nAnswer: 0.377\nQuestion: and in that same year, what was the dividend per share paid?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.93" } ]
CONVFINQA6908	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsystem energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; debt issuances ; and bank financing under new or existing facilities . system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . in february 2012 , system energy vie issued $ 50 million of 4.02% ( 4.02 % ) series h notes due february 2017 . system energy used the proceeds to purchase additional nuclear fuel . system energy has obtained a short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow , through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 200 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits . system energy has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long-term authorization extends through july 2013 . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 120424</td><td>$ 97948</td><td>$ 90507</td><td>$ 42915</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . nuclear matters system energy owns and operates grand gulf . system energy is , therefore , subject to the risks related to owning and operating a nuclear plant . these include risks from the use , storage , handling and disposal of high- level and low-level radioactive materials , regulatory requirement changes , including changes resulting from events at other plants , limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available for losses in connection with nuclear operations , and technological and financial uncertainties related to decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives , including the sufficiency of funds in decommissioning trusts . in the event of an unanticipated early shutdown of grand gulf , system energy may be required to provide additional funds or credit support to satisfy regulatory requirements for decommissioning . after the nuclear incident in japan resulting from the march 2011 earthquake and tsunami , the nrc established a task force to conduct a review of processes and regulations relating to nuclear facilities in the united states . the task force issued a near term ( 90-day ) report in july 2011 that has made recommendations , which are currently being evaluated by the nrc . it is anticipated that the nrc will issue certain orders and requests for information to nuclear plant licensees by the end of the first quarter 2012 that will begin to implement the task force 2019s recommendations . these orders may require u.s . nuclear operators , including entergy , to undertake plant modifications or perform additional analyses that could , among other things , result in increased costs and capital requirements associated with operating entergy 2019s nuclear plants. .\nQuestion: what is the system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "120424.0" } ]
CONVFINQA309	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthrough current cash balances and cash from oper- ations . additionally , the company has existing credit facilities totaling $ 2.5 billion . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2012 . the company 2019s financial covenants require the maintenance of a minimum net worth of $ 9 billion and a total debt-to- capital ratio of less than 60% ( 60 % ) . net worth is defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock plus any cumulative goodwill impairment charges . the calcu- lation also excludes accumulated other compre- hensive income/loss and nonrecourse financial liabilities of special purpose entities . the total debt- to-capital ratio is defined as total debt divided by the sum of total debt plus net worth . at december 31 , 2012 , international paper 2019s net worth was $ 13.9 bil- lion , and the total-debt-to-capital ratio was 42% ( 42 % ) . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capi- tal structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2012 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by s&p and moody 2019s , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2012 , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>maturities of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 444</td><td>$ 708</td><td>$ 479</td><td>$ 571</td><td>$ 216</td><td>$ 7722</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt obligations with right of offset ( b )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>5173</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>198</td><td>136</td><td>106</td><td>70</td><td>50</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>3213</td><td>828</td><td>722</td><td>620</td><td>808</td><td>2654</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ( d )</td><td>$ 3855</td><td>$ 1672</td><td>$ 1307</td><td>$ 6434</td><td>$ 1074</td><td>$ 10517</td></tr></table> ( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to effect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its con- solidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2012 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.2 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.2 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 11 variable interest entities and preferred securities of subsidiaries on pages 69 through 72 in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data ) . ( c ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . ( d ) not included in the above table due to the uncertainty as to the amount and timing of the payment are unrecognized tax bene- fits of approximately $ 620 million . we consider the undistributed earnings of our for- eign subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2012 , to be indefinitely reinvested and , accordingly , no u.s . income taxes have been provided thereon . as of december 31 , 2012 , the amount of cash associated with indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings was approximately $ 840 million . we do not anticipate the need to repatriate funds to the united states to sat- isfy domestic liquidity needs arising in the ordinary course of business , including liquidity needs asso- ciated with our domestic debt service requirements . pension obligations and funding at december 31 , 2012 , the projected benefit obliga- tion for the company 2019s u.s . defined benefit plans determined under u.s . gaap was approximately $ 4.1 billion higher than the fair value of plan assets . approximately $ 3.7 billion of this amount relates to plans that are subject to minimum funding require- ments . under current irs funding rules , the calcu- lation of minimum funding requirements differs from the calculation of the present value of plan benefits ( the projected benefit obligation ) for accounting purposes . in december 2008 , the worker , retiree and employer recovery act of 2008 ( wera ) was passed by the u.s . congress which provided for pension funding relief and technical corrections . funding contributions depend on the funding method selected by the company , and the timing of its implementation , as well as on actual demo- graphic data and the targeted funding level . the company continually reassesses the amount and timing of any discretionary contributions and elected to make voluntary contributions totaling $ 44 million and $ 300 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . at this time , we expect that required contributions to its plans in 2013 will be approximately $ 31 million , although the company may elect to make future voluntary contributions . the timing and amount of future contributions , which could be material , will depend on a number of factors , including the actual earnings and changes in values of plan assets and changes in interest rates . ilim holding s.a . shareholder 2019s agreement in october 2007 , in connection with the for- mation of the ilim holding s.a . joint venture , international paper entered into a share- holder 2019s agreement that includes provisions relating to the reconciliation of disputes among the partners . this agreement provides that at .\nQuestion: what amount of obligations is due within 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "964.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7141	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n28 , 35 , or 90 days . the funds associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs or a buyer is found outside of the auction process . based on broker- dealer valuation models and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment factors , auction rate securities with an original par value of approximately $ 34 million were written-down to an estimated fair value of $ 16 million as of december 31 , 2007 . this write-down resulted in an 201cother-than-temporary 201d impairment charge of approximately $ 8 million ( pre-tax ) included in net income and a temporary impairment charge of $ 10 million ( pre-tax ) reflected as an unrealized loss within other comprehensive income for 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , these investments in auction rate securities have been in a loss position for less than six months . these auction rate securities are classified as non-current marketable securities as of december 31 , 2007 as indicated in the preceding table . 3m reviews impairments associated with the above in accordance with emerging issues task force ( eitf ) 03-1 and fsp sfas 115-1 and 124-1 , 201cthe meaning of other-than-temporary-impairment and its application to certain investments , 201d to determine the classification of the impairment as 201ctemporary 201d or 201cother-than-temporary . 201d a temporary impairment charge results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive income component of stockholders 2019 equity . such an unrealized loss does not reduce net income for the applicable accounting period because the loss is not viewed as other-than-temporary . the company believes that a portion of the impairment of its auction rate securities investments is temporary and a portion is other-than-temporary . the factors evaluated to differentiate between temporary and other-than-temporary include the projected future cash flows , credit ratings actions , and assessment of the credit quality of the underlying collateral . the balance at december 31 , 2007 for marketable securities and short-term investments by contractual maturity are shown below . actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties . dec . 31 , ( millions ) 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>dec . 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>due in one year or less</td><td>$ 231</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>due after one year through three years</td><td>545</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>due after three years through five years</td><td>221</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>due after five years</td><td>62</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total marketable securities</td><td>$ 1059</td></tr></table> predetermined intervals , usually every 7 .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2007, what was the impact of the adjustement on the auction rate securities?\nAnswer: 18.0\nQuestion: and what is this impact as a portion of those original securities?\nAnswer: 0.52941\nQuestion: in that same year, what percentage did the securities due in one year or less represent in relation to the total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.21813" } ]
CONVFINQA1954	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure there were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure during the last two years . item 9a . controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report , an evaluation was carried out by goldman sachs 2019 management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in rule 13a-15 ( e ) under the exchange act ) . based upon that evaluation , our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report . in addition , no change in our internal control over financial reporting ( as defined in rule 13a-15 ( f ) under the exchange act ) occurred during the fourth quarter of our year ended december 31 , 2018 that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting and the report of independent registered public accounting firm are set forth in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 9b . other information not applicable . part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance information relating to our executive officers is included on page 20 of this form 10-k . information relating to our directors , including our audit committee and audit committee financial experts and the procedures by which shareholders can recommend director nominees , and our executive officers will be in our definitive proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of shareholders , which will be filed within 120 days of the end of 2018 ( 2019 proxy statement ) and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . information relating to our code of business conduct and ethics , which applies to our senior financial officers , is included in 201cbusiness 2014 available information 201d in part i , item 1 of this form 10-k . item 11 . executive compensation information relating to our executive officer and director compensation and the compensation committee of the board will be in the 2019 proxy statement and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters information relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners of our common stock and information relating to the security ownership of our management will be in the 2019 proxy statement and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . the table below presents information as of december 31 , 2018 regarding securities to be issued pursuant to outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) and securities remaining available for issuance under our equity compensation plans that were in effect during 2018 . plan category securities to be issued exercise of outstanding options and rights ( a ) weighted average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 17176475 n/a 68211649 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 2013 2013 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted average exercise price of outstanding options ( b )</td><td>securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>17176475</td><td>n/a</td><td>68211649</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>17176475</td><td>-</td><td>68211649</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights includes 17176475 shares that may be issued pursuant to outstanding rsus . these awards are subject to vesting and other conditions to the extent set forth in the respective award agreements , and the underlying shares will be delivered net of any required tax withholding . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no outstanding options . 2030 shares underlying rsus are deliverable without the payment of any consideration , and therefore these awards have not been taken into account in calculating the weighted average exercise price . 196 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what is the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights?\nAnswer: 17176475.0\nQuestion: what is the number of securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "68211649.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6529	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsynopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) and other electronic applications markets . the company believes the acquisition will expand its technology portfolio , channel reach and total addressable market by adding complementary products and expertise for fpga solutions and rapid asic prototyping . purchase price . synopsys paid $ 8.00 per share for all outstanding shares including certain vested options of synplicity for an aggregate cash payment of $ 223.3 million . additionally , synopsys assumed certain employee stock options and restricted stock units , collectively called 201cstock awards . 201d the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 180618</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of assumed vested or earned stock awards</td><td>4169</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition related costs</td><td>8016</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price consideration</td><td>$ 192803</td></tr></table> acquisition related costs consist primarily of professional services , severance and employee related costs and facilities closure costs of which $ 6.8 million have been paid as of october 31 , 2009 . fair value of stock awards assumed . an aggregate of 4.7 million shares of synplicity stock options and restricted stock units were exchanged for synopsys stock options and restricted stock units at an exchange ratio of 0.3392 per share . the fair value of stock options assumed was determined using a black-scholes valuation model . the fair value of stock awards vested or earned of $ 4.2 million was included as part of the purchase price . the fair value of unvested awards of $ 5.0 million will be recorded as operating expense over the remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . purchase price allocation . the company allocated $ 80.0 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets to be amortized over two to seven years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 4.8 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired , was $ 120.3 million and will not be amortized . goodwill primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of cost synergies and sales growth from the integration of synplicity 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations to provide an expansion of products and market reach . fiscal 2007 acquisitions during fiscal year 2007 , the company completed certain purchase acquisitions for cash . the company allocated the total purchase considerations of $ 54.8 million ( which included acquisition related costs of $ 1.4 million ) to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 36.6 million . acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 14.3 million are being amortized over two to nine years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 3.2 million. .\nQuestion: what amount was allocated to identifiable intangible assets, in thousands?\nAnswer: 80000.0\nQuestion: what is the total purchase price?\nAnswer: 192803.0\nQuestion: what portion does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.41493" } ]
CONVFINQA9447	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwestrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) the following table summarizes the weighted average life and the allocation to intangible assets recognized in the mps acquisition , excluding goodwill ( in millions ) : weighted avg . amounts recognized as the acquisition . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted avg.life</td><td>amountsrecognized as ofthe acquisitiondate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>14.6</td><td>$ 1008.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademarks and tradenames</td><td>3.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>photo library</td><td>10.0</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14.4</td><td>$ 1026.4</td></tr></table> none of the intangibles has significant residual value . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 13 to 16 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . star pizza acquisition on march 13 , 2017 , we completed the star pizza acquisition . the transaction provided us with a leadership position in the fast growing small-run pizza box market and increases our vertical integration . the purchase price was $ 34.6 million , net of a $ 0.7 million working capital settlement . we have fully integrated the approximately 22000 tons of containerboard used by star pizza annually . we have included the financial results of the acquired assets since the date of the acquisition in our corrugated packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 24.8 million of customer relationship intangible assets and $ 2.2 million of goodwill . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over 10 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles are amortizable for income tax purposes . packaging acquisition on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . the purchase price was $ 94.1 million , net of cash received of $ 1.7 million , a working capital settlement and a $ 3.5 million escrow receipt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the transaction is subject to an election under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the code that increases the u.s . tax basis in the acquired u.s . entities . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities since the date of the acquisition in our consumer packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 55.0 million of property , plant and equipment , $ 10.5 million of customer relationship intangible assets , $ 9.3 million of goodwill and $ 25.8 million of liabilities , including $ 1.3 million of debt . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 9 to 15 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles of the u.s . entities are amortizable for income tax purposes . sp fiber on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition in a stock purchase . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in gps . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . the purchase price was $ 278.8 million , net of cash received of $ 9.2 million and a working capital .\nQuestion: combined, what was the purchase price allocation for the acquisition and customer relationship intangible assets?\nAnswer: 27.0\nQuestion: and what was the purchase price?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "34.6" } ]
CONVFINQA1239	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nadvance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 30 , 2006 , december 31 , 2005 and january 1 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 8 . inventories , net inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , cost being determined using the last-in , first-out ( \"lifo\" ) method for approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of inventories at both december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . under the lifo method , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most currently purchased inventories while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs relating to prices paid in prior years . the company 2019s costs to acquire inventory have been generally decreasing in recent years as a result of its significant growth . accordingly , the cost to replace inventory is less than the lifo balances carried for similar product . as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , which consist of the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries and are valued under the first-in , first-out ( \"fifo\" ) method . core values are included as part of our merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . additionally , these products are not subject to the frequent cost changes like our other merchandise inventory , thus , there is no material difference from applying either the lifo or fifo valuation methods . the company capitalizes certain purchasing and warehousing costs into inventory . purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , were $ 95576 and $ 92833 , respectively . inventories consist of the following : december 30 , december 31 , 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 30 2006</td><td>december 31 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 1380573</td><td>$ 1294310</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>82767</td><td>72789</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 1463340</td><td>$ 1367099</td></tr></table> replacement cost approximated fifo cost at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company uses a cycle counting program in all distribution centers , parts delivered quickly warehouses , or pdqs , local area warehouses , or laws , and retail stores to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory . the company establishes reserves for estimated shrink based on historical accuracy and effectiveness of the cycle counting program . the company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels and the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions . the nature of the company 2019s inventory is such that the risk of obsolescence is minimal and excess inventory has historically been returned to the company 2019s vendors for credit . the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . 9 . property and equipment : property and equipment are stated at cost , less accumulated depreciation . expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged directly to expense when incurred ; major improvements are capitalized . when items are sold or retired , the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts , with any gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations . depreciation of land improvements , buildings , furniture , fixtures and equipment , and vehicles is provided over the estimated useful lives , which range from 2 to 40 years , of the respective assets using the straight-line method. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in reserves against inventory from 2005 to 2006?\nAnswer: 8551.0\nQuestion: what were the value of reserves in 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22825.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2009	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2001</td><td>667085793</td><td>-94361099 ( 94361099 )</td><td>572724694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>1752833</td><td>1752833</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>4800</td><td>4800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>8385</td><td>1399686</td><td>1408071</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2001</td><td>667094178</td><td>-91203780 ( 91203780 )</td><td>575890398</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2677842</td><td>2677842</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>10490</td><td>2243400</td><td>2253890</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition of technoguide</td><td>2013</td><td>1347485</td><td>1347485</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance december 31 2002</td><td>667104668</td><td>-84931553 ( 84931553 )</td><td>582173115</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2464088</td><td>2464088</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>1320</td><td>1306305</td><td>1307625</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>667105988</td><td>-81157660 ( 81157660 )</td><td>585948328</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what were the number of shares issued to directors in 2001?\nAnswer: 4800.0\nQuestion: what was the number in 2002?\nAnswer: 3500.0\nQuestion: what is the sum number of shares?\nAnswer: 8300.0\nQuestion: what was the number of issued shares in 2003?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3500.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5119	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii , item 8 schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>1178</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>14</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>18</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what is the balance of shares outstanding at the end of 2009?\nAnswer: 1195.0\nQuestion: what about 2008?\nAnswer: 1194.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 1.0\nQuestion: what about if this change was added to the 2009's balance, in millions?\nAnswer: 1196.0\nQuestion: what about in total number of shares?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1196000000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6977	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.84</td><td>$ 152.16</td><td>$ 165.35</td><td>$ 154.61</td><td>$ 189.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.99</td><td>$ 153.54</td><td>$ 174.54</td><td>$ 176.94</td><td>$ 198.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.07</td><td>$ 158.22</td><td>$ 192.80</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the ups share price from 2011 to 2016?\nAnswer: 89.72\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\nAnswer: 0.8972\nQuestion: what is the net change in the s&p 500 index from 2011 to 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "98.09" } ]
CONVFINQA4336	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwere more than offset by higher raw material and energy costs ( $ 312 million ) , increased market related downtime ( $ 187 million ) and other items ( $ 30 million ) . com- pared with 2003 , higher 2005 earnings in the brazilian papers , u.s . coated papers and u.s . market pulp busi- nesses were offset by lower earnings in the u.s . un- coated papers and the european papers businesses . the printing papers segment took 995000 tons of downtime in 2005 , including 540000 tons of lack-of-order down- time to align production with customer demand . this compared with 525000 tons of downtime in 2004 , of which 65000 tons related to lack-of-orders . printing papers in millions 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 7860</td><td>$ 7670</td><td>$ 7280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 552</td><td>$ 581</td><td>$ 464</td></tr></table> uncoated papers sales totaled $ 4.8 billion in 2005 compared with $ 5.0 billion in 2004 and 2003 . sales price realizations in the united states averaged 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , and 4.6% ( 4.6 % ) higher than 2003 . favorable pricing momentum which began in 2004 carried over into the beginning of 2005 . demand , however , began to weaken across all grades as the year progressed , resulting in lower price realizations in the second and third quarters . however , prices stabilized as the year ended . total shipments for the year were 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) lower than in 2004 and 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) lower than in 2003 . to continue matching our productive capacity with customer demand , the business announced the perma- nent closure of three uncoated freesheet machines and took significant lack-of-order downtime during the period . demand showed some improvement toward the end of the year , bolstered by the introduction our new line of vision innovation paper products ( vip technologiestm ) , with improved brightness and white- ness . mill operations were favorable compared to last year , and the rebuild of the no . 1 machine at the east- over , south carolina mill was completed as planned in the fourth quarter . however , the favorable impacts of improved mill operations and lower overhead costs were more than offset by record high input costs for energy and wood and higher transportation costs compared to 2004 . the earnings decline in 2005 compared with 2003 was principally due to lower shipments , higher down- time and increased costs for wood , energy and trans- portation , partially offset by lower overhead costs and favorable mill operations . average sales price realizations for our european operations remained relatively stable during 2005 , but averaged 1% ( 1 % ) lower than in 2004 , and 6% ( 6 % ) below 2003 levels . sales volumes rose slightly , up 1% ( 1 % ) in 2005 com- pared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) compared to 2003 . earnings were lower than in 2004 , reflecting higher wood and energy costs and a compression of margins due to un- favorable foreign currency exchange movements . earn- ings were also adversely affected by downtime related to the rebuild of three paper machines during the year . coated papers sales in the united states were $ 1.6 bil- lion in 2005 , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2004 and $ 1.3 billion in 2003 . the business reported an operating profit in 2005 versus a small operating loss in 2004 . the earnings improvement was driven by higher average sales prices and improved mill operations . price realiza- tions in 2005 averaged 13% ( 13 % ) higher than 2004 . higher input costs for raw materials and energy partially offset the benefits from improved prices and operations . sales volumes were about 1% ( 1 % ) lower in 2005 versus 2004 . market pulp sales from our u.s . and european facilities totaled $ 757 million in 2005 compared with $ 661 mil- lion and $ 571 million in 2004 and 2003 , respectively . operating profits in 2005 were up 86% ( 86 % ) from 2004 . an operating loss had been reported in 2003 . higher aver- age prices and sales volumes , lower overhead costs and improved mill operations in 2005 more than offset in- creases in raw material , energy and chemical costs . u.s . softwood and hardwood pulp prices improved through the 2005 first and second quarters , then declined during the third quarter , but recovered somewhat toward year end . softwood pulp prices ended the year about 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2004 , but were 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2003 , while hardwood pulp prices ended the year about 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2004 and 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2003 . u.s . pulp sales volumes were 12% ( 12 % ) higher than in 2004 and 19% ( 19 % ) higher than in 2003 , reflecting increased global demand . euro- pean pulp volumes increased 15% ( 15 % ) and 2% ( 2 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively , while average sales prices increased 4% ( 4 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively . brazilian paper sales were $ 684 million in 2005 com- pared with $ 592 million in 2004 and $ 540 million in 2003 . sales volumes for uncoated freesheet paper , coated paper and wood chips were down from 2004 , but average price realizations improved for exported un- coated freesheet and coated groundwood paper grades . favorable currency translation , as yearly average real exchange rates versus the u.s . dollar were 17% ( 17 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , positively impacted reported sales in u.s . dollars . average sales prices for domestic un- coated paper declined 4% ( 4 % ) in local currency versus 2004 , while domestic coated paper prices were down 3% ( 3 % ) . operating profits in 2005 were down 9% ( 9 % ) from 2004 , but were up 2% ( 2 % ) from 2003 . earnings in 2005 were neg- atively impacted by a weaker product and geographic sales mix for both uncoated and coated papers , reflecting increased competition and softer demand , particularly in the printing , commercial and editorial market segments. .\nQuestion: what is 5 times 1000?\nAnswer: 5000.0\nQuestion: what is that divided 2004 sales?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.65189" } ]
CONVFINQA182	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmill in the fourth quarter of 2008 . this compares with 635000 tons of total downtime in 2008 of which 305000 tons were lack-of-order downtime . printing papers in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 5680</td><td>$ 6810</td><td>$ 6530</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1091</td><td>474</td><td>839</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales in 2009 were $ 2.8 billion compared with $ 3.4 billion in 2008 and $ 3.5 billion in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 746 million ( $ 307 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with $ 405 million ( $ 435 million excluding shutdown costs for a paper machine ) in 2008 and $ 415 million in 2007 . sales volumes decreased sig- nificantly in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weak customer demand and reduced production capacity resulting from the shutdown of a paper machine at the franklin mill in december 2008 and the conversion of the bastrop mill to pulp production in june 2008 . average sales price realizations were lower reflecting slight declines for uncoated freesheet paper in domestic markets and significant declines in export markets . margins were also unfavorably affected by a higher proportion of shipments to lower-margin export markets . input costs , however , were favorable due to lower wood and chemical costs and sig- nificantly lower energy costs . freight costs were also lower . planned maintenance downtime costs in 2009 were comparable with 2008 . operating costs were favorable , reflecting cost control efforts and strong machine performance . lack-of-order downtime increased to 525000 tons in 2009 , including 120000 tons related to the shutdown of a paper machine at our franklin mill in the 2008 fourth quarter , from 135000 tons in 2008 . operating earnings in 2009 included $ 671 million of alternative fuel mixture cred- its , $ 223 million of costs associated with the shutdown of our franklin mill and $ 9 million of other shutdown costs , while operating earnings in 2008 included $ 30 million of costs for the shutdown of a paper machine at our franklin mill . looking ahead to 2010 , first-quarter sales volumes are expected to increase slightly from fourth-quarter 2009 levels . average sales price realizations should be higher , reflecting the full-quarter impact of sales price increases announced in the fourth quarter for converting and envelope grades of uncoated free- sheet paper and an increase in prices to export markets . however , input costs for wood , energy and chemicals are expected to continue to increase . planned maintenance downtime costs should be lower and operating costs should be favorable . brazil ian papers net sales for 2009 of $ 960 mil- lion increased from $ 950 million in 2008 and $ 850 million in 2007 . operating profits for 2009 were $ 112 million compared with $ 186 million in 2008 and $ 174 million in 2007 . sales volumes increased in 2009 compared with 2008 for both paper and pulp reflect- ing higher export shipments . average sales price realizations were lower due to strong competitive pressures in the brazilian domestic market in the second half of the year , lower export prices and unfavorable foreign exchange rates . margins were unfavorably affected by a higher proportion of lower margin export sales . input costs for wood and chem- icals were favorable , but these benefits were partially offset by higher energy costs . planned maintenance downtime costs were lower , and operating costs were also favorable . earnings in 2009 were adversely impacted by unfavorable foreign exchange effects . entering 2010 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower compared with the fourth quarter of 2009 . profit margins are expected to be slightly higher reflecting a more favorable geographic sales mix and improving sales price realizations in export markets , partially offset by higher planned main- tenance outage costs . european papers net sales in 2009 were $ 1.3 bil- lion compared with $ 1.7 billion in 2008 and $ 1.5 bil- lion in 2007 . operating profits in 2009 of $ 92 million ( $ 115 million excluding expenses associated with the closure of the inverurie mill ) compared with $ 39 mil- lion ( $ 146 million excluding a charge to reduce the carrying value of the fixed assets at the inverurie , scotland mill to their estimated realizable value ) in 2008 and $ 171 million in 2007 . sales volumes in 2009 were lower than in 2008 primarily due to reduced sales of uncoated freesheet paper following the closure of the inverurie mill in 2009 . average sales price realizations decreased significantly in 2009 across most of western europe , but margins increased in poland and russia reflecting the effect of local currency devaluations . input costs were favorable as lower wood costs , particularly in russia , were only partially offset by higher energy costs in poland and higher chemical costs . planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher in 2009 than in 2008 , while manufacturing operating costs were lower . operating profits in 2009 also reflect favorable foreign exchange impacts . looking ahead to 2010 , sales volumes are expected to decline from strong 2009 fourth-quarter levels despite solid customer demand . average sales price realizations are expected to increase over the quar- ter , primarily in eastern europe , as price increases .\nQuestion: what was the north american printing papers net sales in 2009?\nAnswer: 2.8\nQuestion: and converted to the thousands?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2800.0" } ]
CONVFINQA158	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( \"s&p 500 retail index\" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( \"s&p 500\" ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2010</td><td>december 31 , 2011</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o'reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 213</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 419</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>103</td><td>128</td><td>185</td><td>203</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in o'reilly automotive from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: 32.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "100.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3274	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .\nQuestion: what was the value of accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis as of 1/1/07?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "65.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8406	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued during 2012 , the albertsons joint venture distributed $ 50.3 million of which the company received $ 6.9 million , which was recognized as income from cash received in excess of the company 2019s investment , before income tax , and is included in equity in income from other real estate investments , net on the company 2019s consolidated statements of income . in january 2015 , the company invested an additional $ 85.3 million of new equity in the company 2019s albertsons joint venture to facilitate the acquisition of safeway inc . by the cerberus lead consortium . as a result , kimco now holds a 9.8% ( 9.8 % ) ownership interest in the combined company which operates 2230 stores across 34 states . leveraged lease - during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with the fasb 2019s lease guidance . as of december 31 , 2014 , 19 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down $ 32.3 million in mortgage debt and the remaining 11 properties remain encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of $ 11.2 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 8.3</td><td>$ 15.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>30.3</td><td>30.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-10.1 ( 10.1 )</td><td>-16.1 ( 16.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-12.9 ( 12.9 )</td><td>-19.9 ( 19.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 15.6</td><td>$ 10.2</td></tr></table> 9 . variable interest entities : consolidated ground-up development projects included within the company 2019s ground-up development projects at december 31 , 2014 , is an entity that is a vie , for which the company is the primary beneficiary . this entity was established to develop real estate property to hold as a long-term investment . the company 2019s involvement with this entity is through its majority ownership and management of the property . this entity was deemed a vie primarily based on the fact that the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support . the initial equity contributed to this entity was not sufficient to fully finance the real estate construction as development costs are funded by the partners throughout the construction period . the company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of this vie as a result of its controlling financial interest . at december 31 , 2014 , total assets of this ground-up development vie were $ 77.7 million and total liabilities were $ 0.1 million . the classification of these assets is primarily within real estate under development in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets and the classifications of liabilities are primarily within accounts payable and accrued expenses on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets . substantially all of the projected development costs to be funded for this ground-up development vie , aggregating $ 32.8 million , will be funded with capital contributions from the company and by the outside partners , when contractually obligated . the company has not provided financial support to this vie that it was not previously contractually required to provide. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of net rentals in 2013 and 2014?\nAnswer: 24.2\nQuestion: what is the average per year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12.1" } ]
CONVFINQA7108	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nadditions to property , plant and equipment are our most significant use of cash and cash equivalents . the following table shows capital expenditures related to continuing operations by segment and reconciles to additions to property , plant and equipment as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows for 2014 , 2013 and 2012: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>north america e&p</td><td>$ 4698</td><td>$ 3649</td><td>$ 3988</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international e&p</td><td>534</td><td>456</td><td>235</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>oil sands mining</td><td>212</td><td>286</td><td>188</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>corporate</td><td>51</td><td>58</td><td>115</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total capital expenditures</td><td>5495</td><td>4449</td><td>4526</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>change in capital expenditure accrual</td><td>-335 ( 335 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-165 ( 165 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions to property plant and equipment</td><td>$ 5160</td><td>$ 4443</td><td>$ 4361</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2014 , we had repurchased a total of 121 million common shares at a cost of $ 4.7 billion , including 29 million shares at a cost of $ 1 billion in the first six months of 2014 and 14 million shares at a cost of $ 500 million in the third quarter of 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for discussion of purchases of common stock . liquidity and capital resources our main sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents , internally generated cash flow from operations , continued access to capital markets , our committed revolving credit facility and sales of non-strategic assets . our working capital requirements are supported by these sources and we may issue commercial paper backed by our $ 2.5 billion revolving credit facility to meet short-term cash requirements . because of the alternatives available to us as discussed above and access to capital markets through the shelf registration discussed below , we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund not only our current operations , but also our near-term and long-term funding requirements including our capital spending programs , dividend payments , defined benefit plan contributions , repayment of debt maturities and other amounts that may ultimately be paid in connection with contingencies . at december 31 , 2014 , we had approximately $ 4.9 billion of liquidity consisting of $ 2.4 billion in cash and cash equivalents and $ 2.5 billion availability under our revolving credit facility . as discussed in more detail below in 201coutlook 201d , we are targeting a $ 3.5 billion budget for 2015 . based on our projected 2015 cash outlays for our capital program and dividends , we expect to outspend our cash flows from operations for the year . we will be constantly monitoring our available liquidity during 2015 and we have the flexibility to adjust our budget throughout the year in response to the commodity price environment . we will also continue to drive the fundamentals of expense management , including organizational capacity and operational reliability . capital resources credit arrangements and borrowings in may 2014 , we amended our $ 2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility and extended the maturity to may 2019 . see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for additional terms and rates . at december 31 , 2014 , we had no borrowings against our revolving credit facility and no amounts outstanding under our u.s . commercial paper program that is backed by the revolving credit facility . at december 31 , 2014 , we had $ 6391 million in long-term debt outstanding , and $ 1068 million is due within one year , of which the majority is due in the fourth quarter of 2015 . we do not have any triggers on any of our corporate debt that would cause an event of default in the case of a downgrade of our credit ratings . shelf registration we have a universal shelf registration statement filed with the sec , under which we , as \"well-known seasoned issuer\" for purposes of sec rules , have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities from time to time. .\nQuestion: what was the total capital expenditures in 2014?\nAnswer: 5495.0\nQuestion: and for 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4449.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8535	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncontributions and future benefit payments we expect to make contributions of $ 28.1 million to our defined benefit , other postretirement , and postemployment benefits plans in fiscal 2009 . actual 2009 contributions could exceed our current projections , as influenced by our decision to undertake discretionary funding of our benefit trusts versus other competing investment priorities and future changes in government requirements . estimated benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid from fiscal 2009-2018 as follows : in millions defined benefit pension postretirement benefit plans gross payments medicare subsidy receipts postemployment benefit ......................................................................................................................................................................................... . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>defined benefit pension plans</td><td>other postretirement benefit plans gross payments</td><td>medicare subsidy receipts</td><td>postemployment benefit plans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 176.3</td><td>$ 56.0</td><td>$ -6.1 ( 6.1 )</td><td>$ 16.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>182.5</td><td>59.9</td><td>-6.7 ( 6.7 )</td><td>17.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>189.8</td><td>63.3</td><td>-7.3 ( 7.3 )</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>197.5</td><td>67.0</td><td>-8.0 ( 8.0 )</td><td>18.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>206.6</td><td>71.7</td><td>-8.7 ( 8.7 )</td><td>19.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2014 2013 2018</td><td>1187.3</td><td>406.8</td><td>-55.3 ( 55.3 )</td><td>106.3</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans the general mills savings plan is a defined contribution plan that covers salaried and nonunion employees . it had net assets of $ 2309.9 million as of may 25 , 2008 and $ 2303.0 million as of may 27 , 2007.this plan is a 401 ( k ) savings plan that includes a number of investment funds and an employee stock ownership plan ( esop ) . we sponsor another savings plan for certain hourly employees with net assets of $ 16.0 million as of may 25 , 2008 . our total recognized expense related to defined contribution plans was $ 61.9 million in fiscal 2008 , $ 48.3 million in fiscal 2007 , and $ 45.5 million in fiscal 2006 . the esop originally purchased our common stock principally with funds borrowed from third parties and guaranteed by us.the esop shares are included in net shares outstanding for the purposes of calculating eps . the esop 2019s third-party debt was repaid on june 30 , 2007 . the esop 2019s only assets are our common stock and temporary cash balances.the esop 2019s share of the total defined contribution expense was $ 52.3 million in fiscal 2008 , $ 40.1 million in fiscal 2007 , and $ 37.6 million in fiscal 2006 . the esop 2019s expensewas calculated by the 201cshares allocated 201dmethod . the esop used our common stock to convey benefits to employees and , through increased stock ownership , to further align employee interests with those of stockholders.wematched a percentage of employee contributions to the general mills savings plan with a base match plus a variable year end match that depended on annual results . employees received our match in the form of common stock . our cash contribution to the esop was calculated so as to pay off enough debt to release sufficient shares to make our match . the esop used our cash contributions to the plan , plus the dividends received on the esop 2019s leveraged shares , to make principal and interest payments on the esop 2019s debt . as loan payments were made , shares became unencumbered by debt and were committed to be allocated . the esop allocated shares to individual employee accounts on the basis of the match of employee payroll savings ( contributions ) , plus reinvested dividends received on previously allocated shares . the esop incurred net interest of less than $ 1.0 million in each of fiscal 2007 and 2006 . the esop used dividends of $ 2.5 million in fiscal 2007 and $ 3.9 million in 2006 , along with our contributions of less than $ 1.0 million in each of fiscal 2007 and 2006 to make interest and principal payments . the number of shares of our common stock allocated to participants in the esop was 5.2 million as of may 25 , 2008 , and 5.4 million as of may 27 , 2007 . annual report 2008 81 .\nQuestion: what was the total of net assets in 2008?\nAnswer: 2309.9\nQuestion: and what was it in 2007?\nAnswer: 2303.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 6.9\nQuestion: and for the two years prior to 2008, what was the total recognized expense related to defined contribution plans?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "110.2" } ]
CONVFINQA8705	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nalexion pharmaceuticals , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) in 2006 , we completed a final phase iii trial of pexelizumab . after reviewing results from that trial , we along with p&g , determined not to pursue further development of pexelizumab . effective march 30 , 2007 , we and p&g mutually agreed to terminate the collaboration agreement . as the relevant agreement has been terminated in march 2007 , the remaining portion of the $ 10000 non-refundable up-front license fee , or $ 5343 , was recognized as revenue in the year ended december 31 , 2007 and is included in contract research revenues . license and research and development agreements we have entered into a number of license , research and development and manufacturing development agreements since our inception . these agreements have been made with various research institutions , universities , contractors , collaborators , and government agencies in order to advance and obtain technologies and services related to our business . license agreements generally provide for an initial fee followed by annual minimum royalty payments . additionally , certain agreements call for future payments upon the attainment of agreed upon milestones , such as , but not limited to , investigational new drug , or ind , application or approval of biologics license application . these agreements require minimum royalty payments based on sales of products developed from the applicable technologies , if any . clinical and manufacturing development agreements generally provide for us to fund manufacturing development and on-going clinical trials . clinical trial and development agreements include contract services and outside contractor services including contracted clinical site services related to patient enrolment for our clinical trials . manufacturing development agreements include clinical manufacturing and manufacturing development and scale-up . we have executed a large-scale product supply agreement with lonza sales ag for the long-term commercial manufacture of soliris ( see note 9 ) . in order to maintain our rights under these agreements , we may be required to provide a minimum level of funding or support . we may elect to terminate these arrangements . accordingly , we recognize the expense and related obligation related to these arrangements over the period of performance . the minimum fixed payments ( assuming non-termination of the above agreements ) as of december 31 , 2007 , for each of the next five years are as follows : years ending december 31 , license agreements clinical and manufacturing development agreements . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ending december 31,</td><td>license agreements</td><td>clinical and manufacturing development agreements</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 707</td><td>$ 2860</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>552</td><td>3750</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>322</td><td>7500</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>300</td><td>7500</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>300</td><td>7500</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in license agreements from 2008 to 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-155.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10410	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nair mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .\nQuestion: what is the backlog at the end of 2006?\nAnswer: 19700.0\nQuestion: what about 2005?\nAnswer: 18600.0\nQuestion: what is the difference\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1100.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6056	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrepublic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) high quality financial institutions . such balances may be in excess of fdic insured limits . to manage the related credit exposure , we continually monitor the credit worthiness of the financial institutions where we have deposits . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we provide services , as well as the dispersion of our operations across many geographic areas . we provide services to small-container , large-container , municipal and residential , and energy services customers in the united states and puerto rico . we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers , but generally do not require collateral to support customer receivables . we establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors including the credit risk of specific customers , age of receivables outstanding , historical trends , economic conditions and other information . accounts receivable , net accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal , energy services and other services . our receivables are recorded when billed or when the related revenue is earned , if earlier , and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash . the carrying value of our receivables , net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , represents their estimated net realizable value . provisions for doubtful accounts are evaluated on a monthly basis and are recorded based on our historical collection experience , the age of the receivables , specific customer information and economic conditions . we also review outstanding balances on an account-specific basis . in general , reserves are provided for accounts receivable in excess of 90 days outstanding . past due receivable balances are written-off when our collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting amounts due . the following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td><td>$ 38.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions charged to expense</td><td>30.6</td><td>20.4</td><td>22.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accounts written-off</td><td>-35.7 ( 35.7 )</td><td>-23.1 ( 23.1 )</td><td>-14.9 ( 14.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 38.9</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td></tr></table> restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 141.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities of which $ 71.4 million supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability . additionally , we obtain funds through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds for the purpose of financing qualifying expenditures at our landfills , transfer stations , collection and recycling centers . the funds are deposited directly into trust accounts by the bonding authorities at the time of issuance . as the use of these funds is contractually restricted , and we do not have the ability to use these funds for general operating purposes , they are classified as restricted cash and marketable securities in our consolidated balance sheets . in the normal course of business , we may be required to provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities in connection with municipal residential collection contracts , closure or post- closure of landfills , environmental remediation , environmental permits , and business licenses and permits as a financial guarantee of our performance . at several of our landfills , we satisfy financial assurance requirements by depositing cash into restricted trust funds or escrow accounts . property and equipment we record property and equipment at cost . expenditures for major additions and improvements to facilities are capitalized , while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred . when property is retired or .\nQuestion: what was the change in the account balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2016 to 2017?\nAnswer: -2.7\nQuestion: and what was this change as a percentage of that account balance in 2016?\nAnswer: -0.05782\nQuestion: and as of december 31 of the last year of that period, what was the amount from restricted cash and marketable securities for the supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability?\nAnswer: 71.4\nQuestion: what was the total of that restricted cash and marketable securities?\nAnswer: 141.1\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total, did that amount represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.50602" } ]
CONVFINQA9111	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsee note 10 goodwill and other intangible assets for further discussion of the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets . the estimated amount of rbc bank ( usa ) revenue and net income ( excluding integration costs ) included in pnc 2019s consolidated income statement for 2012 was $ 1.0 billion and $ 273 million , respectively . upon closing and conversion of the rbc bank ( usa ) transaction , subsequent to march 2 , 2012 , separate records for rbc bank ( usa ) as a stand-alone business have not been maintained as the operations of rbc bank ( usa ) have been fully integrated into pnc . rbc bank ( usa ) revenue and earnings disclosed above reflect management 2019s best estimate , based on information available at the reporting date . the following table presents certain unaudited pro forma information for illustrative purposes only , for 2012 and 2011 as if rbc bank ( usa ) had been acquired on january 1 , 2011 . the unaudited estimated pro forma information combines the historical results of rbc bank ( usa ) with the company 2019s consolidated historical results and includes certain adjustments reflecting the estimated impact of certain fair value adjustments for the respective periods . the pro forma information is not indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition taken place on january 1 , 2011 . in particular , no adjustments have been made to eliminate the impact of other-than-temporary impairment losses and losses recognized on the sale of securities that may not have been necessary had the investment securities been recorded at fair value as of january 1 , 2011 . the unaudited pro forma information does not consider any changes to the provision for credit losses resulting from recording loan assets at fair value . additionally , the pro forma financial information does not include the impact of possible business model changes and does not reflect pro forma adjustments to conform accounting policies between rbc bank ( usa ) and pnc . additionally , pnc expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other business synergies , including revenue growth , as a result of the acquisition that are not reflected in the pro forma amounts that follow . as a result , actual results will differ from the unaudited pro forma information presented . table 57 : rbc bank ( usa ) and pnc unaudited pro forma results . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>for the year ended december 31 2012</td><td>for the year ended december 31 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total revenues</td><td>$ 15721</td><td>$ 15421</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>2989</td><td>2911</td></tr></table> in connection with the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition and other prior acquisitions , pnc recognized $ 267 million of integration charges in 2012 . pnc recognized $ 42 million of integration charges in 2011 in connection with prior acquisitions . the integration charges are included in the table above . sale of smartstreet effective october 26 , 2012 , pnc divested certain deposits and assets of the smartstreet business unit , which was acquired by pnc as part of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition , to union bank , n.a . smartstreet is a nationwide business focused on homeowner or community association managers and had approximately $ 1 billion of assets and deposits as of september 30 , 2012 . the gain on sale was immaterial and resulted in a reduction of goodwill and core deposit intangibles of $ 46 million and $ 13 million , respectively . results from operations of smartstreet from march 2 , 2012 through october 26 , 2012 are included in our consolidated income statement . flagstar branch acquisition effective december 9 , 2011 , pnc acquired 27 branches in the northern metropolitan atlanta , georgia area from flagstar bank , fsb , a subsidiary of flagstar bancorp , inc . the fair value of the assets acquired totaled approximately $ 211.8 million , including $ 169.3 million in cash , $ 24.3 million in fixed assets and $ 18.2 million of goodwill and intangible assets . we also assumed approximately $ 210.5 million of deposits associated with these branches . no deposit premium was paid and no loans were acquired in the transaction . our consolidated income statement includes the impact of the branch activity subsequent to our december 9 , 2011 acquisition . bankatlantic branch acquisition effective june 6 , 2011 , we acquired 19 branches in the greater tampa , florida area from bankatlantic , a subsidiary of bankatlantic bancorp , inc . the fair value of the assets acquired totaled $ 324.9 million , including $ 256.9 million in cash , $ 26.0 million in fixed assets and $ 42.0 million of goodwill and intangible assets . we also assumed approximately $ 324.5 million of deposits associated with these branches . a $ 39.0 million deposit premium was paid and no loans were acquired in the transaction . our consolidated income statement includes the impact of the branch activity subsequent to our june 6 , 2011 acquisition . sale of pnc global investment servicing on july 1 , 2010 , we sold pnc global investment servicing inc . ( gis ) , a leading provider of processing , technology and business intelligence services to asset managers , broker- dealers and financial advisors worldwide , for $ 2.3 billion in cash pursuant to a definitive agreement entered into on february 2 , 2010 . this transaction resulted in a pretax gain of $ 639 million , net of transaction costs , in the third quarter of 2010 . this gain and results of operations of gis through june 30 , 2010 are presented as income from discontinued operations , net of income taxes , on our consolidated income statement . as part of the sale agreement , pnc has agreed to provide certain transitional services on behalf of gis until completion of related systems conversion activities . 138 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what would be the net income in 2011 if integration charges were not included?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2953.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4951	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunconditional purchase obligations approximately $ 390 of our long-term unconditional purchase obligations relate to feedstock supply for numerous hyco ( hydrogen , carbon monoxide , and syngas ) facilities . the price of feedstock supply is principally related to the price of natural gas . however , long-term take-or-pay sales contracts to hyco customers are generally matched to the term of the feedstock supply obligations and provide recovery of price increases in the feedstock supply . due to the matching of most long-term feedstock supply obligations to customer sales contracts , we do not believe these purchase obligations would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations . refer to note 17 , commitments and contingencies , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on our unconditional purchase obligations . the unconditional purchase obligations also include other product supply and purchase commitments and electric power and natural gas supply purchase obligations , which are primarily pass-through contracts with our customers . in addition , purchase commitments to spend approximately $ 540 for additional plant and equipment are included in the unconditional purchase obligations in 2016 . we also purchase materials , energy , capital equipment , supplies , and services as part of the ordinary course of business under arrangements that are not unconditional purchase obligations . the majority of such purchases are for raw materials and energy , which are obtained under requirements-type contracts at market prices . obligation for future contribution to an equity affiliate on 19 april 2015 , a joint venture between air products and acwa holding entered into a 20-year oxygen and nitrogen supply agreement to supply saudi aramco 2019s oil refinery and power plant being built in jazan , saudi arabia . air products owns 25% ( 25 % ) of the joint venture and guarantees the repayment of its share of an equity bridge loan . in total , we expect to invest approximately $ 100 in this joint venture . as of 30 september 2015 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 67.5 for our obligation to make future equity contributions based on advances received by the joint venture under the loan . income tax liabilities noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities as of 30 september 2015 were $ 903.3 . tax liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits as of 30 september 2015 were $ 97.5 . these tax liabilities were excluded from the contractual obligations table , as it is impractical to determine a cash impact by year given that payments will vary according to changes in tax laws , tax rates , and our operating results . in addition , there are uncertainties in timing of the effective settlement of our uncertain tax positions with respective taxing authorities . refer to note 23 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . pension benefits the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans that cover a substantial portion of its worldwide employees . the principal defined benefit pension plans 2014the u.s . salaried pension plan and the u.k . pension plan 2014were closed to new participants in 2005 and were replaced with defined contribution plans . over the long run , the shift to defined contribution plans is expected to reduce volatility of both plan expense and contributions . the fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2015 measurement date decreased to $ 3916.4 from $ 4114.6 at the end of fiscal year 2014 . the projected benefit obligation for these plans was $ 4787.8 and $ 4738.6 at the end of the fiscal years 2015 and 2014 , respectively . refer to note 16 , retirement benefits , to the consolidated financial statements for comprehensive and detailed disclosures on our postretirement benefits . pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 135.9</td><td>$ 169.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above )</td><td>35.2</td><td>5.8</td><td>19.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td><td>4.6% ( 4.6 % )</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>7.4% ( 7.4 % )</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.9% ( 3.9 % )</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the fair market value of plan assets of the benefit pension plans in 2015?\nAnswer: 3916.4\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\nAnswer: 4114.6\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: -198.2\nQuestion: what was the fair market value of plan assets of the benefit pension plans in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4114.6" } ]
CONVFINQA5302	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsystem energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . a0 a0system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 111667</td><td>$ 33809</td><td>$ 39926</td><td>$ 2373</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 17.8 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 50 million in loans were outstanding under the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits . system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis federal regulation see the 201crate , cost-recovery , and other regulation 2013 federal regulation 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of federal regulation . complaint against system energy in january 2017 the apsc and mpsc filed a complaint with the ferc against system energy . the complaint seeks a reduction in the return on equity component of the unit power sales agreement pursuant to which system energy sells its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans . entergy arkansas also sells some of its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans under separate agreements . the current return on equity under the unit power sales agreement is 10.94% ( 10.94 % ) . the complaint alleges that the return on equity is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive . the complaint requests the ferc to institute proceedings to investigate the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity , and also requests that the ferc establish january 23 , 2017 as a refund effective date . the complaint includes return on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity for system energy is between 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) and 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) . system energy answered the complaint in february 2017 and disputes that a return on equity of 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) to 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) is just and reasonable . the lpsc and the city council intervened in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint . system energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding . in september 2017 the ferc established a refund effective date of january 23 , 2017 , consolidated the return on equity complaint with the proceeding described in unit power sales agreement below , and directed the parties to engage in settlement .\nQuestion: what was the value of receivables in 2017?\nAnswer: 111667.0\nQuestion: and in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2373.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1813	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndevon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2011</td><td>403</td><td>379</td><td>782</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>134</td><td>68</td><td>202</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>9</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-90 ( 90 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2012 , devon had 840 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 7 percent increase as compared to 2011 and represents 28 percent of its total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 203 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 90 mmboe , or 12 percent , of the 2011 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.3 billion for 2012 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 16 mmboe primarily due to its evaluation of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which it does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas at carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2012 largely related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 429 mmboe and 367 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2012 - reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 - reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . 2010 - reserves increased 72 mmboe due to higher gas prices , partially offset by the effect of higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . of the 72 mmboe price revisions , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 22 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions noted in the proved undeveloped reserves discussion above . total revisions other than price for 2010 primarily related to devon 2019s drilling and development in the barnett shale. .\nQuestion: what were proved undeveloped reserved in canada for 2011?\nAnswer: 379.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2012?\nAnswer: 433.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 812.0\nQuestion: what was the canadian value in 2011?\nAnswer: 379.0\nQuestion: what is that value over the sum value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.46675" } ]
CONVFINQA7853	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis results of reportable business segments net sales segment income ( millions ) 2008 2007 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions ) performance coatings</td><td>net sales 2008 $ 4716</td><td>2007 $ 3811</td><td>segment income 2008 $ 582</td><td>2007 $ 563</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial coatings</td><td>3999</td><td>3646</td><td>212</td><td>370</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>architectural coatings 2013 emea</td><td>2249</td><td>2014</td><td>141</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>optical and specialty materials</td><td>1134</td><td>1029</td><td>244</td><td>235</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodity chemicals</td><td>1837</td><td>1539</td><td>340</td><td>243</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>glass</td><td>1914</td><td>2195</td><td>70</td><td>138</td></tr></table> performance coatings sales increased $ 905 million or 24% ( 24 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 21% ( 21 % ) due to acquisitions , largely due to the impact of the sigmakalon protective and marine coatings business . sales also grew by 3% ( 3 % ) due to higher selling prices and 2% ( 2 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation . sales volumes declined 2% ( 2 % ) as reduced volumes in architectural coatings 2013 americas and asia pacific and automotive refinish were not fully offset by improved volumes in the aerospace and protective and marine businesses . volume growth in the aerospace businesses occurred throughout the world , while the volume growth in protective and marine coatings occurred primarily in asia . segment income increased $ 19 million in 2008 . factors increasing segment income were the positive impact of acquisitions , lower overhead costs and the positive impact of foreign currency translation . the benefit of higher selling prices more than offset the negative impact of inflation , including higher raw materials and benefit costs . segment income was reduced by the impact of the lower sales volumes in architectural coatings and automotive refinish , which more than offset the benefit of volume gains in the aerospace and protective and marine coatings businesses . industrial coatings sales increased $ 353 million or 10% ( 10 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 11% ( 11 % ) due to acquisitions , including the impact of the sigmakalon industrial coatings business . sales also grew 3% ( 3 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation , and 1% ( 1 % ) from higher selling prices . sales volumes declined 5% ( 5 % ) as reduced volumes were experienced in all three businesses , reflecting the substantial declines in global demand . volume declines in the automotive and industrial businesses were primarily in the u.s . and canada . additional volume declines in the european and asian regions were experienced by the industrial coatings business . in packaging coatings , volume declines in europe were only partially offset by gains in asia and north america . segment income declined $ 158 million in 2008 due to the lower volumes and inflation , including higher raw material and freight costs , the impact of which was only partially mitigated by the increased selling prices . segment income also declined due to higher selling and distribution costs , including higher bad debt expense . factors increasing segment income were the earnings of acquired businesses , the positive impact of foreign currency translation and lower manufacturing costs . architectural coatings - emea sales for the year were $ 2249 million . this business was acquired in the sigmakalon acquisition . segment income was $ 141 million , which included amortization expense of $ 63 million related to acquired intangible assets and depreciation expense of $ 58 million . optical and specialty materials sales increased $ 105 million or 10% ( 10 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 5% ( 5 % ) due to higher volumes in our optical products business resulting from the launch of transitions optical 2019s next generation lens product , 3% ( 3 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation and 2% ( 2 % ) due to increased selling prices . segment income increased $ 9 million in 2008 . the increase in segment income was the result of increased sales volumes and the favorable impact of currency partially offset by increased selling and marketing costs in the optical products business related to the transitions optical product launch mentioned above . increased selling prices only partially offset higher raw material costs , primarily in our silicas business . commodity chemicals sales increased $ 298 million or 19% ( 19 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 18% ( 18 % ) due to higher selling prices and 1% ( 1 % ) due to improved sales volumes . segment income increased $ 97 million in 2008 . segment income increased in large part due to higher selling prices , which more than offset the negative impact of inflation , primarily higher raw material and energy costs . segment income also improved due to lower manufacturing costs , while lower margin mix and equity earnings reduced segment income . glass sales decreased $ 281 million or 13% ( 13 % ) in 2008 . sales decreased 11% ( 11 % ) due to the divestiture of the automotive glass and services business in september 2008 and 4% ( 4 % ) due to lower sales volumes . sales increased 2% ( 2 % ) due to higher selling prices . segment income decreased $ 68 million in 2008 . segment income decreased due to the divestiture of the automotive glass and services business , lower volumes , the negative impact of inflation and lower equity earnings from our asian fiber glass joint ventures . factors increasing segment income were lower manufacturing costs , higher selling prices and stronger foreign currency . outlook overall global economic activity was volatile in 2008 with an overall downward trend . the north american economy continued a slowing trend which began during the second half of 2006 and continued all of 2007 . the impact of the weakening u.s . economy was particularly 2008 ppg annual report and form 10-k 17 .\nQuestion: what was the foreign currency translation gain in 2008?\nAnswer: 76.22\nQuestion: without this gain, what would have been, in millions, the total of sales in the performance coatings segment in that year?\nAnswer: 4639.78\nQuestion: and in this same year, what was the change in the revenue of the glass segment caused by higher selling prices, in millions of dollars?\nAnswer: 43.9\nQuestion: how much is that in dollars?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "43900000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5415	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2014 to 2013 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013 net revenue</td><td>$ 5524</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>miso deferral</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 5735</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2013 and july 2014 . energy efficiency revenues are offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have minimal effect on net income ; 2022 the effect of the apsc 2019s order in entergy arkansas 2019s 2013 rate case , including an annual base rate increase effective january 2014 offset by a miso rider to provide customers credits in rates for transmission revenue received through miso ; 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mspc , effective september 2013 ; 2022 an increase in entergy mississippi 2019s storm damage rider , as approved by the mpsc , effective october 2013 . the increase in the storm damage rider is offset by other operation and maintenance expenses and has no effect on net income ; 2022 an annual base rate increase at entergy texas , effective april 2014 , as a result of the puct 2019s order in the september 2013 rate case ; and 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate proceedings . the asset retirement obligation affects net revenue because entergy records a regulatory debit or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation- related costs collected in revenue . the variance is primarily caused by increases in regulatory credits because of decreases in decommissioning trust earnings and increases in depreciation and accretion expenses and increases in regulatory credits to realign the asset retirement obligation regulatory assets with regulatory treatment . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 3129 gwh , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in billed electricity usage primarily due to an increase in sales to industrial customers and the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansions , recovery of a major refining customer from an unplanned outage in 2013 , and continued moderate growth in the manufacturing sector . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of the non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc , partially offset by the deferral in april 2013 , as approved by the apsc , of costs incurred from march 2010 through december 2012 related to the transition and implementation of joining the miso .\nQuestion: what was the difference in net revenue between 2013 and 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "211.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7663	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncompared to earlier levels . the pre-tax non-cash impairments of certain mineral rights and real estate discussed above under the caption fffdland and development impairments fffd are not included in segment income . liquidity and capital resources on january 29 , 2018 , we announced that a definitive agreement had been signed for us to acquire all of the outstanding shares of kapstone for $ 35.00 per share and the assumption of approximately $ 1.36 billion in net debt , for a total enterprise value of approximately $ 4.9 billion . in contemplation of the transaction , on march 6 , 2018 , we issued $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% ( 3.75 % ) senior notes due 2025 and $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) senior notes due 2028 in an unregistered offering pursuant to rule 144a and regulation s under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the fffdsecurities act fffd ) . in addition , on march 7 , 2018 , we entered into the delayed draw credit facilities ( as hereinafter defined ) that provide for $ 3.8 billion of senior unsecured term loans . on november 2 , 2018 , in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition , we drew upon the facility in full . the proceeds of the delayed draw credit facilities ( as hereinafter defined ) and other sources of cash were used to pay the consideration for the kapstone acquisition , to repay certain existing indebtedness of kapstone and to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the kapstone acquisition . we fund our working capital requirements , capital expenditures , mergers , acquisitions and investments , restructuring activities , dividends and stock repurchases from net cash provided by operating activities , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our new a/r sales agreement ( as hereinafter defined ) , proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment removed from service and proceeds received in connection with the issuance of debt and equity securities . see fffdnote 13 . debt fffdtt of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . funding for our domestic operations in the foreseeable future is expected to come from sources of liquidity within our domestic operations , including cash and cash equivalents , and available borrowings under our credit facilities . as such , our foreign cash and cash equivalents are not expected to be a key source of liquidity to our domestic operations . at september 30 , 2018 , excluding the delayed draw credit facilities , we had approximately $ 3.2 billion of availability under our committed credit facilities , primarily under our revolving credit facility , the majority of which matures on july 1 , 2022 . this liquidity may be used to provide for ongoing working capital needs and for other general corporate purposes , including acquisitions , dividends and stock repurchases . certain restrictive covenants govern our maximum availability under the credit facilities . we test and report our compliance with these covenants as required and we were in compliance with all of these covenants at september 30 , 2018 . at september 30 , 2018 , we had $ 104.9 million of outstanding letters of credit not drawn cash and cash equivalents were $ 636.8 million at september 30 , 2018 and $ 298.1 million at september 30 , 2017 . we used a significant portion of the cash and cash equivalents on hand at september 30 , 2018 in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition . approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of the cash and cash equivalents at september 30 , 2018 were held outside of the u.s . at september 30 , 2018 , total debt was $ 6415.2 million , $ 740.7 million of which was current . at september 30 , 2017 , total debt was $ 6554.8 million , $ 608.7 million of which was current . cash flow activityy . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2018</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2017</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2420.9</td><td>$ 1900.5</td><td>$ 1688.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>$ -1298.9 ( 1298.9 )</td><td>$ -1285.8 ( 1285.8 )</td><td>$ -1351.4 ( 1351.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>$ -755.1 ( 755.1 )</td><td>$ -655.4 ( 655.4 )</td><td>$ -231.0 ( 231.0 )</td></tr></table> net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2018 increased $ 520.4 million from fiscal 2017 primarily due to higher cash earnings and lower cash taxes due to the impact of the tax act . net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2017 increased $ 212.1 million from fiscal 2016 primarily due to a $ 111.6 million net increase in cash flow from working capital changes plus higher after-tax cash proceeds from our land and development segment fffds accelerated monetization . the changes in working capital in fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included a .\nQuestion: what was the net cash used for investing activities for the year ended 9/30/18?\nAnswer: 1298.9\nQuestion: and the net cash used for financing activities during that year?\nAnswer: 755.1\nQuestion: combining these two values, what is the total net cash used?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2054.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3962	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naverage revenue per car 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>average revenue per car</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 3286</td><td>$ 3080</td><td>$ 3352</td><td>7% ( 7 % )</td><td>( 8 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>2082</td><td>1838</td><td>2017</td><td>13</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2874</td><td>2761</td><td>2818</td><td>4</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy</td><td>1697</td><td>1543</td><td>1622</td><td>10</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>2461</td><td>2388</td><td>2620</td><td>3</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>974</td><td>896</td><td>955</td><td>9</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average</td><td>$ 1823</td><td>$ 1718</td><td>$ 1848</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>( 7 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> agricultural products 2013 higher volume , fuel surcharges , and price improvements increased agricultural freight revenue in 2010 versus 2009 . increased shipments from the midwest to export ports in the pacific northwest combined with heightened demand in mexico drove higher corn and feed grain shipments in 2010 . increased corn and feed grain shipments into ethanol plants in california and idaho and continued growth in ethanol shipments also contributed to this increase . in 2009 , some ethanol plants temporarily ceased operations due to lower ethanol margins , which contributed to the favorable year-over-year comparison . in addition , strong export demand for u.s . wheat via the gulf ports increased shipments of wheat and food grains compared to 2009 . declines in domestic wheat and food shipments partially offset the growth in export shipments . new business in feed and animal protein shipments also increased agricultural shipments in 2010 compared to 2009 . lower volume and fuel surcharges decreased agricultural freight revenue in 2009 versus 2008 . price improvements partially offset these declines . lower demand in both export and domestic markets led to fewer shipments of corn and feed grains , down 11% ( 11 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . weaker worldwide demand also reduced export shipments of wheat and food grains in 2009 versus 2008 . automotive 2013 37% ( 37 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) increases in shipments of finished vehicles and automotive parts in 2010 , respectively , combined with core pricing gains and fuel surcharges , improved automotive freight revenue from relatively weak 2009 levels . economic conditions in 2009 led to poor auto sales and reduced vehicle production , which in turn reduced shipments of finished vehicles and parts during the declines in shipments of finished vehicles and auto parts and lower fuel surcharges reduced freight revenue in 2009 compared to 2008 . vehicle shipments were down 35% ( 35 % ) and parts were down 24% ( 24 % ) . core pricing gains partially offset these declines . these volume declines resulted from economic conditions that reduced sales and vehicle production . in addition , two major domestic automotive manufacturers declared bankruptcy in the second quarter of 2009 , affecting production levels . although the federal car allowance rebate system ( the 201ccash for clunkers 201d program ) helped stimulate vehicle sales and shipments in the third quarter of 2009 , production cuts and soft demand throughout the year more than offset the program 2019s benefits . 2010 agricultural revenue 2010 automotive revenue .\nQuestion: what is the sum of revenue in agriculture in 2009 and 2010?\nAnswer: 6366.0\nQuestion: what is the revenue in 2008?\nAnswer: 3352.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum?\nAnswer: 9718.0\nQuestion: what is the average value per year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3239.33333" } ]
CONVFINQA7624	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nloss on the contract may be recorded , if necessary , and any remaining deferred implementation revenues would typically be recognized over the remaining service period through the termination date . in connection with our long-term outsourcing service agreements , highly customized implementation efforts are often necessary to set up clients and their human resource or benefit programs on our systems and operating processes . for outsourcing services sold separately or accounted for as a separate unit of accounting , specific , incremental and direct costs of implementation incurred prior to the services commencing are generally deferred and amortized over the period that the related ongoing services revenue is recognized . deferred costs are assessed for recoverability on a periodic basis to the extent the deferred cost exceeds related deferred revenue . pensions we sponsor defined benefit pension plans throughout the world . our most significant plans are located in the u.s. , the u.k. , the netherlands and canada . our significant u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants . we have ceased crediting future benefits relating to salary and service for our u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canadian plans to the extent statutorily permitted . in 2016 , we estimate pension and post-retirement net periodic benefit cost for major plans to increase by $ 15 million to a benefit of approximately $ 54 million . the increase in the benefit is primarily due to a change in our approach to measuring service and interest cost . effective december 31 , 2015 and for 2016 expense , we have elected to utilize a full yield curve approach in the estimation of the service and interest cost components of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost for our major pension and other post-retirement benefit plans by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows . in 2015 and prior years , we estimated these components of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost by applying a single weighted-average discount rate , derived from the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period . we have made this change to improve the correlation between projected benefit cash flows and the corresponding yield curve spot rates and to provide a more precise measurement of service and interest costs . this change does not affect the measurement of the projected benefit obligation as the change in the service cost and interest cost is completely offset in the actuarial ( gain ) loss recorded in other comprehensive income . we accounted for this change as a change in estimate and , accordingly , will account for it prospectively . recognition of gains and losses and prior service certain changes in the value of the obligation and in the value of plan assets , which may occur due to various factors such as changes in the discount rate and actuarial assumptions , actual demographic experience and/or plan asset performance are not immediately recognized in net income . such changes are recognized in other comprehensive income and are amortized into net income as part of the net periodic benefit cost . unrecognized gains and losses that have been deferred in other comprehensive income , as previously described , are amortized into compensation and benefits expense as a component of periodic pension expense based on the average life expectancy of the u.s. , the netherlands , canada , and u.k . plan members . we amortize any prior service expense or credits that arise as a result of plan changes over a period consistent with the amortization of gains and losses . as of december 31 , 2015 , our pension plans have deferred losses that have not yet been recognized through income in the consolidated financial statements . we amortize unrecognized actuarial losses outside of a corridor , which is defined as 10% ( 10 % ) of the greater of market-related value of plan assets or projected benefit obligation . to the extent not offset by future gains , incremental amortization as calculated above will continue to affect future pension expense similarly until fully amortized . the following table discloses our unrecognized actuarial gains and losses , the number of years over which we are amortizing the experience loss , and the estimated 2016 amortization of loss by country ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.k .</td><td>u.s .</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrecognized actuarial gains and losses</td><td>$ 1511</td><td>$ 1732</td><td>$ 382</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization period ( in years )</td><td>10 - 32</td><td>7 - 28</td><td>15 - 41</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>estimated 2016 amortization of loss</td><td>$ 37</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 10</td></tr></table> the unrecognized prior service cost ( income ) at december 31 , 2015 was $ 9 million , $ 46 million , and $ ( 7 ) million in the u.s. , u.k . and other plans , respectively . for the u.s . pension plans we use a market-related valuation of assets approach to determine the expected return on assets , which is a component of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income . this approach .\nQuestion: what was the total estimated amortization loss in the us and uk?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "89.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6627	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 18 2013 earnings per share ( eps ) basic eps is calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to allegion plc by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the applicable period . diluted eps is calculated after adjusting the denominator of the basic eps calculation for the effect of all potentially dilutive ordinary shares , which in the company 2019s case , includes shares issuable under share-based compensation plans . the following table summarizes the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average number of basic shares</td><td>95.1</td><td>95.8</td><td>95.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issuable under incentive stock plans</td><td>0.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average number of diluted shares</td><td>96.0</td><td>96.9</td><td>96.9</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2017 , 0.1 million stock options were excluded from the computation of weighted average diluted shares outstanding because the effect of including these shares would have been anti-dilutive . note 19 2013 commitments and contingencies the company is involved in various litigations , claims and administrative proceedings , including those related to environmental and product warranty matters . amounts recorded for identified contingent liabilities are estimates , which are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect additional information when it becomes available . subject to the uncertainties inherent in estimating future costs for contingent liabilities , except as expressly set forth in this note , management believes that any liability which may result from these legal matters would not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition , results of operations , liquidity or cash flows of the company . environmental matters the company is dedicated to an environmental program to reduce the utilization and generation of hazardous materials during the manufacturing process and to remediate identified environmental concerns . as to the latter , the company is currently engaged in site investigations and remediation activities to address environmental cleanup from past operations at current and former production facilities . the company regularly evaluates its remediation programs and considers alternative remediation methods that are in addition to , or in replacement of , those currently utilized by the company based upon enhanced technology and regulatory changes . changes to the company's remediation programs may result in increased expenses and increased environmental reserves . the company is sometimes a party to environmental lawsuits and claims and has received notices of potential violations of environmental laws and regulations from the u.s . environmental protection agency and similar state authorities . it has also been identified as a potentially responsible party ( \"prp\" ) for cleanup costs associated with off-site waste disposal at federal superfund and state remediation sites . for all such sites , there are other prps and , in most instances , the company 2019s involvement is minimal . in estimating its liability , the company has assumed it will not bear the entire cost of remediation of any site to the exclusion of other prps who may be jointly and severally liable . the ability of other prps to participate has been taken into account , based on our understanding of the parties 2019 financial condition and probable contributions on a per site basis . additional lawsuits and claims involving environmental matters are likely to arise from time to time in the future . the company incurred $ 3.2 million , $ 23.3 million , and $ 4.4 million of expenses during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , for environmental remediation at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by the company . in the fourth-quarter of 2016 , with the collaboration and approval of state regulators , the company launched a proactive , alternative approach to remediate two sites in the united states . this approach will allow the company to more aggressively address environmental conditions at these sites and reduce the impact of potential changes in regulatory requirements . as a result , the company recorded a $ 15 million charge for environmental remediation in the fourth quarter of 2016 . environmental remediation costs are recorded in costs of goods sold within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company has recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 28.9 million and $ 30.6 million . the total reserve at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 included $ 8.9 million and $ 9.6 million related to remediation of sites previously disposed by the company . environmental reserves are classified as accrued expenses and other current liabilities or other noncurrent liabilities based on their expected term . the company's total current environmental reserve at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 was $ 12.6 million and $ 6.1 million and the remainder is classified as noncurrent . given the evolving nature of environmental laws , regulations and technology , the ultimate cost of future compliance is uncertain. .\nQuestion: what is the total expense for environmental remediation at sites 2016 and 2017?\nAnswer: 26.5\nQuestion: what about if the expense from 2015 is included?\nAnswer: 30.9\nQuestion: what is the average for these three years?\nAnswer: 10.3\nQuestion: what is the expense for environmental remediation in 2017?\nAnswer: 28.9\nQuestion: what about in 2016?\nAnswer: 30.6\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-1.7" } ]
CONVFINQA8573	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i item 1 entergy corporation , domestic utility companies , and system energy employment litigation ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , and system energy ) entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are defendants in numerous lawsuits that have been filed by former employees alleging that they were wrongfully terminated and/or discriminated against on the basis of age , race , sex , and/or other protected characteristics . entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are vigorously defending these suits and deny any liability to the plaintiffs . however , no assurance can be given as to the outcome of these cases , and at this time management cannot estimate the total amount of damages sought . included in the employment litigation are two cases filed in state court in claiborne county , mississippi in december 2002 . the two cases were filed by former employees of entergy operations who were based at grand gulf . entergy operations and entergy employees are named as defendants . the cases make employment-related claims , and seek in total $ 53 million in alleged actual damages and $ 168 million in punitive damages . entergy subsequently removed both proceedings to the federal district in jackson , mississippi . entergy cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this proceeding . research spending entergy is a member of the electric power research institute ( epri ) . epri conducts a broad range of research in major technical fields related to the electric utility industry . entergy participates in various epri projects based on entergy's needs and available resources . the domestic utility companies contributed $ 1.6 million in 2004 , $ 1.5 million in 2003 , and $ 2.1 million in 2002 to epri . the non-utility nuclear business contributed $ 3.2 million in 2004 and $ 3 million in both 2003 and 2002 to epri . employees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers . as of december 31 , 2004 , entergy employed 14425 people . u.s . utility: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>1494</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy gulf states</td><td>1641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>943</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>793</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>403</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>system energy</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>entergy operations</td><td>2735</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>entergy services</td><td>2704</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>entergy nuclear operations</td><td>3245</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other subsidiaries</td><td>277</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total full-time</td><td>14235</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>part-time</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total entergy</td><td>14425</td></tr></table> approximately 4900 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , and the international brotherhood of teamsters union. .\nQuestion: what percentage of full-time employees are in entergy nuclear operations?\nAnswer: 0.22796\nQuestion: and what percentage are in entergy gulf states?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.11528" } ]
CONVFINQA8683	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe realize synergies from consolidating businesses into our existing operations , whether through acquisitions or public-private partnerships , which allow us to reduce capital and expense requirements associated with truck routing , personnel , fleet maintenance , inventories and back-office administration . operating model the goal of our operating model pillar is to deliver a consistent , high quality service to all of our customers through the republic way : one way . everywhere . every day . this approach of developing standardized processes with rigorous controls and tracking allows us to leverage our scale and deliver durable operational excellence . the republic way is the key to harnessing the best of what we do as operators and translating that across all facets of our business . a key enabler of the republic way is our organizational structure that fosters a high performance culture by maintaining 360 degree accountability and full profit and loss responsibility with general management , supported by a functional structure to provide subject matter expertise . this structure allows us to take advantage of our scale by coordinating functionally across all of our markets , while empowering local management to respond to unique market dynamics . we have rolled out several productivity and cost control initiatives designed to deliver the best service possible to our customers in the most efficient and environmentally sound way . fleet automation approximately 72% ( 72 % ) of our residential routes have been converted to automated single driver trucks . by converting our residential routes to automated service , we reduce labor costs , improve driver productivity , decrease emissions and create a safer work environment for our employees . additionally , communities using automated vehicles have higher participation rates in recycling programs , thereby complementing our initiative to expand our recycling capabilities . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 16% ( 16 % ) of our fleet operates on cng . we expect to continue our gradual fleet conversion to cng , our preferred alternative fuel technology , as part of our ordinary annual fleet replacement process . we believe a gradual fleet conversion is most prudent to realize the full value of our previous fleet investments . approximately 33% ( 33 % ) of our replacement vehicle purchases during 2015 were cng vehicles . we believe using cng vehicles provides us a competitive advantage in communities with strict clean emission initiatives that focus on protecting the environment . although upfront costs are higher , using cng reduces our overall fleet operating costs through lower fuel expenses . as of december 31 , 2015 , we operated 38 cng fueling stations . standardized maintenance based on an industry trade publication , we operate the ninth largest vocational fleet in the united states . as of december 31 , 2015 , our average fleet age in years , by line of business , was as follows : approximate number of vehicles approximate average age . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>approximate number of vehicles</td><td>approximate average age</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>residential</td><td>7200</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>small-container commercial</td><td>4400</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>large-container industrial</td><td>4000</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>15600</td><td>7.5</td></tr></table> onefleet , our standardized vehicle maintenance program , enables us to use best practices for fleet management , truck care and maintenance . through standardization of core functions , we believe we can minimize variability .\nQuestion: what is the percentage of vehicles that have already been converted to natural gas?\nAnswer: 0.16\nQuestion: and what is the amount equivalent to this percentage?\nAnswer: 2496.0\nQuestion: and as of 2015, what was the total of vehicles for residential?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7200.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6795	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\non december 19 , 2011 , we redeemed the remaining $ 175 million of our 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) notes due april 15 , 2012 , and all $ 300 million of our outstanding 6.125% ( 6.125 % ) notes due january 15 , 2012 . the redemptions resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $ 5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 . receivables securitization facility 2013 as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded $ 0 and $ 100 million , respectively , as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10 ) . 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities , including our headquarters building ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.3 billion as of december 31 , 2013 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 included $ 2486 million , net of $ 1092 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2467 million , net of $ 966 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2013 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 512</td><td>$ 272</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>477</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>438</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>400</td><td>247</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>332</td><td>225</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1907</td><td>957</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 4066</td><td>$ 2200</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-498 ( 498 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1702</td></tr></table> approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 618 million in 2013 , $ 631 million in 2012 , and $ 637 million in 2011 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .\nQuestion: what is the value of the remaining non-cancelable operating leases that is due in 2015?\nAnswer: 477.0\nQuestion: what is the total minimum lease payments for operating leases?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4066.0" } ]
CONVFINQA807	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/25/2009</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>97.43</td><td>101.85</td><td>88.54</td><td>151.43</td><td>183.29</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>116.52</td><td>125.94</td><td>145.09</td><td>184.52</td><td>216.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>121.00</td><td>132.42</td><td>124.95</td><td>163.20</td><td>207.93</td></tr></table> dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .\nQuestion: what is the yearly dividend per share in 2014?\nAnswer: 0.4\nQuestion: how many shares received that amount of dividend?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1217.5" } ]
CONVFINQA1384	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nto determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2011</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>465</td><td>60.70</td><td>1534</td><td>60.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>64.21</td><td>-831 ( 831 )</td><td>45.47</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>60.27</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>60.51</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>1119</td><td>$ 61.14</td><td>3061</td><td>$ 60.04</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 .\nQuestion: what was the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012?\nAnswer: 60.68\nQuestion: and what was it for 2011?\nAnswer: 63.25\nQuestion: what was, then, the total of that fair value for both years combined?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "123.93" } ]
CONVFINQA331	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 161 fifth third bancorp as of december 31 , 2012 ( $ in millions ) significant unobservable ranges of financial instrument fair value valuation technique inputs inputs weighted-average commercial loans held for sale $ 9 appraised value appraised value nm nm cost to sell nm 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) commercial and industrial loans 83 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm commercial mortgage loans 46 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm commercial construction loans 4 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm msrs 697 discounted cash flow prepayment speed 0 - 100% ( 100 % ) ( fixed ) 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ( adjustable ) 26.9% ( 26.9 % ) discount rates 9.4 - 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) ( fixed ) 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) ( adjustable ) 11.7% ( 11.7 % ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>financial instrument</td><td>fair value</td><td>valuation technique</td><td>significant unobservableinputs</td><td>ranges ofinputs</td><td>weighted-average</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commercial loans held for sale</td><td>$ 9</td><td>appraised value</td><td>appraised valuecost to sell</td><td>nmnm</td><td>nm10.0% ( nm10.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>commercial and industrial loans</td><td>83</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commercial mortgage loans</td><td>46</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commercial construction loans</td><td>4</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>msrs</td><td>697</td><td>discounted cash flow</td><td>prepayment speeddiscount rates</td><td>0 - 100%9.4 - 18.0% ( 18.0 % )</td><td>( fixed ) 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ( adjustable ) 26.9% ( 26.9 % ) ( fixed ) 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) ( adjustable ) 11.7% ( 11.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>oreo</td><td>165</td><td>appraised value</td><td>appraised value</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr></table> commercial loans held for sale during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp transferred $ 5 million and $ 16 million , respectively , of commercial loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale that upon transfer were measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs . these loans had fair value adjustments in 2013 and 2012 totaling $ 4 million and $ 1 million , respectively , and were generally based on appraisals of the underlying collateral and were therefore , classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . additionally , during 2013 and 2012 there were fair value adjustments on existing commercial loans held for sale of $ 3 million and $ 12 million , respectively . the fair value adjustments were also based on appraisals of the underlying collateral and were therefore classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . an adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement . the accounting department determines the procedures for valuation of commercial hfs loans which may include a comparison to recently executed transactions of similar type loans . a monthly review of the portfolio is performed for reasonableness . quarterly , appraisals approaching a year old are updated and the real estate valuation group , which reports to the chief risk and credit officer , in conjunction with the commercial line of business review the third party appraisals for reasonableness . additionally , the commercial line of business finance department , which reports to the bancorp chief financial officer , in conjunction with accounting review all loan appraisal values , carrying values and vintages . commercial loans held for investment during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp recorded nonrecurring impairment adjustments to certain commercial and industrial , commercial mortgage and commercial construction loans held for investment . larger commercial loans included within aggregate borrower relationship balances exceeding $ 1 million that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review for impairment . the bancorp considers the current value of collateral , credit quality of any guarantees , the guarantor 2019s liquidity and willingness to cooperate , the loan structure and other factors when evaluating whether an individual loan is impaired . when the loan is collateral dependent , the fair value of the loan is generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan and therefore these loans were classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . in cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value , an impairment loss is recognized . an adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement . the fair values and recognized impairment losses are reflected in the previous table . commercial credit risk , which reports to the chief risk and credit officer , is responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates for commercial loans held for investment . mortgage interest rates increased during the year ended december 31 , 2013 and the bancorp recognized a recovery of temporary impairment on servicing rights . the bancorp recognized temporary impairments in certain classes of the msr portfolio during the year ended december 31 , 2012 and the carrying value was adjusted to the fair value . msrs do not trade in an active , open market with readily observable prices . while sales of msrs do occur , the precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available . accordingly , the bancorp estimates the fair value of msrs using internal discounted cash flow models with certain unobservable inputs , primarily prepayment speed assumptions , discount rates and weighted average lives , resulting in a classification within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . refer to note 11 for further information on the assumptions used in the valuation of the bancorp 2019s msrs . the secondary marketing department and treasury department are responsible for determining the valuation methodology for msrs . representatives from secondary marketing , treasury , accounting and risk management are responsible for reviewing key assumptions used in the internal discounted cash flow model . two external valuations of the msr portfolio are obtained from third parties that use valuation models in order to assess the reasonableness of the internal discounted cash flow model . additionally , the bancorp participates in peer surveys that provide additional confirmation of the reasonableness of key assumptions utilized in the msr valuation process and the resulting msr prices . during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp recorded nonrecurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as oreo and measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value . these nonrecurring losses are primarily due to declines in real estate values of the properties recorded in oreo . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , these losses include $ 19 million and $ 17 million , respectively , recorded as charge-offs , on new oreo properties transferred from loans during the respective periods and $ 26 million and $ 57 million , respectively , recorded as negative fair value adjustments on oreo in other noninterest income subsequent to their transfer from loans . as discussed in the following paragraphs , the fair value amounts are generally based on appraisals of the property values , resulting in a .\nQuestion: what were the nonrecurring losses in 2013?\nAnswer: 19.0\nQuestion: and in 2012?\nAnswer: 17.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?\nAnswer: 2.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change for this period?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.11765" } ]
CONVFINQA8701	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ngoodwill is reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment . in addition , the company performs an impairment analysis of other intangible assets based on the occurrence of other factors . such factors include , but are not limited to , signifi- cant changes in membership , state funding , medical contracts and provider networks and contracts . an impairment loss is rec- ognized if the carrying value of intangible assets exceeds the implied fair value . the company did not recognize any impair- ment losses for the periods presented . medical claims liabilities medical services costs include claims paid , claims reported but not yet paid ( inventory ) , estimates for claims incurred but not yet received ( ibnr ) and estimates for the costs necessary to process unpaid claims . the estimates of medical claims liabilities are developed using standard actuarial methods based upon historical data for payment patterns , cost trends , product mix , seasonality , utiliza- tion of healthcare services and other relevant factors including product changes . these estimates are continually reviewed and adjustments , if necessary , are reflected in the period known . management did not change actuarial methods during the years presented . management believes the amount of medical claims payable is reasonable and adequate to cover the company 2019s liabil- ity for unpaid claims as of december 31 , 2005 ; however , actual claim payments may differ from established estimates . revenue recognition the majority of the company 2019s medicaid managed care premi- um revenue is received monthly based on fixed rates per member as determined by state contracts . some contracts allow for addi- tional premium related to certain supplemental services provided such as maternity deliveries . revenue is recognized as earned over the covered period of services . revenues are recorded based on membership and eligibility data provided by the states , which may be adjusted by the states for updates to this membership and eligibility data . these adjustments are immaterial in relation to total revenue recorded and are reflected in the period known . premiums collected in advance are recorded as unearned revenue . the specialty services segment generates revenue under con- tracts with state and local government entities , our health plans and third-party customers . revenues for services are recognized when the services are provided or as ratably earned over the cov- ered period of services . for performance-based contracts , the company does not recognize revenue subject to refund until data is sufficient to measure performance . such amounts are recorded as unearned revenue . revenues due to the company are recorded as premium and related receivables and recorded net of an allowance for uncol- lectible accounts based on historical trends and management 2019s judgment on the collectibility of these accounts . activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowances beginning of year</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 219</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>80</td><td>407</td><td>472</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs of uncollectible receivables</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>-552 ( 552 )</td><td>-84 ( 84 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allowances end of year</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td></tr></table> significant customers centene receives the majority of its revenues under contracts or subcontracts with state medicaid managed care programs . the contracts , which expire on various dates between june 30 , 2006 and august 31 , 2008 , are expected to be renewed . contracts with the states of indiana , kansas , texas and wisconsin each accounted for 18% ( 18 % ) , 12% ( 12 % ) , 22% ( 22 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , of the company 2019s revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . reinsurance centene has purchased reinsurance from third parties to cover eligible healthcare services . the current reinsurance program covers 90% ( 90 % ) of inpatient healthcare expenses in excess of annual deductibles of $ 300 per member , up to a lifetime maximum of $ 2000 . centene 2019s medicaid managed care subsidiaries are respon- sible for inpatient charges in excess of an average daily per diem . reinsurance recoveries were $ 4014 , $ 3730 , and $ 5345 , in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4105 , $ 6724 , and $ 6185 in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance recoveries , net of expenses , are included in medical costs . other income ( expense ) other income ( expense ) consists principally of investment income and interest expense . investment income is derived from the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , restricted deposits and investments . interest expense relates to borrowings under our credit facility , mortgage interest , interest on capital leases and credit facility fees . income taxes deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases . deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled . the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of the tax rate change . valuation allowances are provided when it is considered more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized . in determining if a deductible temporary difference or net operating loss can be realized , the company considers future reversals of .\nQuestion: what were the allowances at the beginning of the year in 2005?\nAnswer: 462.0\nQuestion: and in 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "607.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7593	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 32452</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>35138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>50421</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>39067</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>26301</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>137858</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>321237</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>73512</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 247725</td></tr></table> grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2008, what was the full amount representing interest?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "73512.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8544	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements recognizing customer revenue , the company must assess the collectability of both the amounts billed and the portion recognized on a straight-line basis . this assessment takes customer credit risk and business and industry conditions into consideration to ultimately determine the collectability of the amounts billed . to the extent the amounts , based on management 2019s estimates , may not be collectible , recognition is deferred until such point as the uncertainty is resolved . any amounts which were previously recognized as revenue and subsequently determined to be uncollectible are charged to bad debt expense . accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts related to estimated losses resulting from a customer 2019s inability to make required payments and reserves for amounts invoiced whose collectability is not reasonably assured . these allowances are generally estimated based on payment patterns , days past due and collection history , and incorporate changes in economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical trends , such as customers in bankruptcy , liquidation or reorganization . receivables are written-off against the allowances when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1,</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td><td>$ 8850</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>16219</td><td>26771</td><td>12059</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recoveries and other</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td><td>-9733 ( 9733 )</td><td>-9427 ( 9427 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31,</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td></tr></table> the company 2019s largest international customer is iusacell , which is the brand name under which a group of companies controlled by grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201cgrupo iusacell 201d ) operates . iusacell represented approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the company 2019s total revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2010 . grupo iusacell has been engaged in a refinancing of a majority of its u.s . dollar denominated debt , and in connection with this process , two of the legal entities of the group , including grupo iusacell , voluntarily filed for a pre-packaged concurso mercantil ( a process substantially equivalent to chapter 11 of u.s . bankruptcy law ) with the backing of a majority of their financial creditors in december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , iusacell notes receivable , net , and related assets ( which include financing lease commitments and a deferred rent asset that are primarily long-term in nature ) were $ 19.7 million and $ 51.2 million , respectively . functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with its largest international customer , iusacell , which included , among other changes , converting all of iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company has determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional .\nQuestion: what is the balance of allowances at the end of 2010?\nAnswer: 22505.0\nQuestion: what about in 2009?\nAnswer: 28520.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: -6015.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.2109" } ]
CONVFINQA6206	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 166137 )</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2018 . a0 a0the $ 150 million credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against $ 5 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . a0 a0as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 50 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 24.9 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc , and the current authorization extends through december 2018 . entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery retail rates 2015 base rate filing in april 2015 , entergy arkansas filed with the apsc for a general change in rates , charges , and tariffs . the filing notified the apsc of entergy arkansas 2019s intent to implement a forward test year formula rate plan pursuant to arkansas legislation passed in 2015 , and requested a retail rate increase of $ 268.4 million , with a net increase in revenue of $ 167 million . the filing requested a 10.2% ( 10.2 % ) return on common equity . in september 2015 the apsc staff and intervenors filed direct testimony , with the apsc staff recommending a revenue requirement of $ 217.9 million and a 9.65% ( 9.65 % ) return on common equity . in december 2015 , entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and certain of the intervenors in the rate case filed with the apsc a joint motion for approval of a settlement of the case that proposed a retail rate increase of approximately $ 225 million with a net increase in revenue of approximately $ 133 million ; an authorized return on common equity of 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) ; and a formula rate plan tariff that provides a +/- 50 basis point band around the 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) allowed return on common equity . a significant portion of the rate increase is related to entergy arkansas 2019s acquisition in march 2016 of union power station power block 2 for a base purchase price of $ 237 million . the settlement agreement also provided for amortization over a 10-year period of $ 7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano post-fukushima compliance and $ 9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano flood barrier compliance . a settlement hearing was held in january 2016 . in february 2016 the apsc approved the settlement with one exception that reduced the retail rate increase proposed in the settlement by $ 5 million . the settling parties agreed to the apsc modifications in february 2016 . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . in march 2016 , entergy arkansas made a compliance filing regarding the .\nQuestion: what was the total of the entergy arkansas 2019s payables in 2017, in millions?\nAnswer: 166137.0\nQuestion: and what was it for 2016?\nAnswer: 51232.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total of payables for both years?\nAnswer: 217369.0\nQuestion: including 2015, what becomes this total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "270111.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5907	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations . the company believes that adequate provisions have been made for income taxes for all periods through december 31 , 2010 . 12 . stock-based compensation the company recognized stock-based compensation of $ 52.6 million , $ 60.7 million and $ 54.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 included $ 6.9 million related to the modification of the vesting and exercise terms for certain employee 2019s equity awards . the company did not capitalize any stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . summary of stock-based compensation plans 2014the company maintains equity incentive plans that provide for the grant of stock-based awards to its directors , officers and employees . under the 2007 equity incentive plan ( 201c2007 plan 201d ) , which provides for the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options , as well as restricted stock units , restricted stock and other stock-based awards , exercise prices in the case of non-qualified and incentive stock options are not less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant . equity awards typically vest ratably over various periods , generally four years , and generally expire ten years from the date of grant . stock options 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , the company had the ability to grant stock-based awards with respect to an aggregate of 22.0 million shares of common stock under the 2007 plan . the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the table below . the risk-free treasury rate is based on the u.s . treasury yield in effect at the accounting measurement date . the expected life ( estimated period of time outstanding ) was estimated using the vesting term and historical exercise behavior of company employees . the expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the expected life of the stock options . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.39% ( 2.39 % )</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.04% ( 2.04 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % ) 2013 3.05% ( 3.05 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.35% ( 2.35 % )</td><td>1.71% ( 1.71 % )</td><td>1.89% ( 1.89 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4.60 years</td><td>4.00 years</td><td>4.00 years</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.11% ( 37.11 % ) 2013 37.48% ( 37.48 % )</td><td>36.00% ( 36.00 % ) 2013 36.63% ( 36.63 % )</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % ) 2013 35.30% ( 35.30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.14% ( 37.14 % )</td><td>36.23% ( 36.23 % )</td><td>29.10% ( 29.10 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant date fair value per share during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 15.03 , $ 8.90 and $ 9.55 , respectively . the intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 62.7 million , $ 40.1 million and $ 99.1 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was approximately $ 27.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $ 129.1 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company realized approximately $ 0.3 million of state tax benefits from the exercise of stock options. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the intrinsic value of stock options from 2007 to 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-59.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1871	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portu- guese and latin american markets and although pullmantur has diversified its passenger sourcing over the past few years , spain still represents pullmantur 2019s largest market . as previously disclosed , during 2012 european economies continued to demonstrate insta- bility in light of heightened concerns over sovereign debt issues as well as the impact of proposed auster- ity measures on certain markets . the spanish econ- omy was more severely impacted than many other economies and there is significant uncertainty as to when it will recover . in addition , the impact of the costa concordia incident has had a more lingering effect than expected and the impact in future years is uncertain . these factors were identified in the past as significant risks which could lead to the impairment of pullmantur 2019s goodwill . more recently , the spanish economy has progressively worsened and forecasts suggest the challenging operating environment will continue for an extended period of time . the unemployment rate in spain reached 26% ( 26 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is expected to rise further in 2013 . the international monetary fund , which had projected gdp growth of 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) a year ago , revised its 2013 gdp projections downward for spain to a contraction of 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and further reduced it to a contraction of 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) in january of 2013 . during the latter half of 2012 new austerity measures , such as increases to the value added tax , cuts to benefits , the phasing out of exemptions and the suspension of government bonuses , were implemented by the spanish government . we believe these austerity measures are having a larger impact on consumer confidence and discretionary spending than previously anticipated . as a result , there has been a significant deterioration in bookings from guests sourced from spain during the 2013 wave season . the combination of all of these factors has caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the expectations regarding future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined the implied fair value of goodwill for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 million and rec- ognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . there have been no goodwill impairment charges related to the pullmantur reporting unit in prior periods . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) perform worse than contemplated in our discounted cash flow model , or if there are material changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impair- ment analyses , especially in net yields , an additional impairment charge of the pullmantur reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 218883</td><td>$ 225679</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>impairment charge</td><td>-17356 ( 17356 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>3339</td><td>-6796 ( 6796 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 204866</td><td>$ 218883</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of our trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . these trademarks and trade names relate to pullmantur and we have used a discount rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . as described in note 3 . goodwill , the continued deterioration of the spanish economy caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections for the pullmantur reporting unit , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the timing of future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined that the fair value of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names no longer exceeded their carrying value . accordingly , we recog- nized an impairment charge of approximately $ 17.4 million to write down trademarks and trade names to their fair value of $ 204.9 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) 0494.indd 76 3/27/13 12:53 pm .\nQuestion: what was the change in the value of intangible assets from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: -14017.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change during this time?\nAnswer: -0.06404\nQuestion: what was the total value of intangible assets in 2011 and 2012?\nAnswer: 423749.0\nQuestion: and the average during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "211874.5" } ]
CONVFINQA8699	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nissuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2012 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) amount available for future share repurchases the program ( b ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a )</td><td>amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012</td><td>842445</td><td>$ 93.38</td><td>842445</td><td>$ 2522</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012</td><td>872973</td><td>90.86</td><td>872973</td><td>2443</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012</td><td>1395288</td><td>92.02</td><td>1395288</td><td>2315</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>3110706</td><td>$ 92.07</td><td>3110706</td><td>$ 2315</td></tr></table> ( a ) we repurchased a total of 3.1 million shares of our common stock for $ 286 million during the quarter ended december 31 , 2012 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2010 . ( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , authorizing an amount available for share repurchases of $ 6.5 billion . under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . the program does not have an expiration date . as of december 31 , 2012 , we had repurchased a total of 54.3 million shares under the program for $ 4.2 billion. .\nQuestion: what portion of total stock purchases occurred in october 2012?\nAnswer: 0.27082\nQuestion: how many shares were purchased during november 26 - december 31, 2012?\nAnswer: 1395288.0\nQuestion: at that average price?\nAnswer: 92.02\nQuestion: what is the total value of these purchases?\nAnswer: 128394401.76\nQuestion: what about in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "128.3944" } ]
CONVFINQA7029	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the units consisted of ( i ) approximately 81.8 million preferred a units par value $ 1.00 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the preferred a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after one year or callable by the company any time after six months and contain a promote feature based upon an increase in net operating income of the properties capped at a 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) increase , ( ii ) 2000 class a preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to libor plus 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) per annum on the class a preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , ( iii ) 2627 class b-1 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-1 preferred par value and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock , equal to the cash redemption amount , as defined , ( iv ) 5673 class b-2 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-2 preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , and ( v ) 640001 class c downreit units , valued at an issuance price of $ 30.52 per unit which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock equal to the class c cash amount , as defined . the following units have been redeemed as of december 31 , 2010 : redeemed par value redeemed ( in millions ) redemption type . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>units redeemed</td><td>par value redeemed ( in millions )</td><td>redemption type</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>preferred a units</td><td>2200000</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a preferred units</td><td>2000</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 preferred units</td><td>2438</td><td>$ 24.4</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 preferred units</td><td>5576</td><td>$ 55.8</td><td>cash/charitable contribution</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class c downreit units</td><td>61804</td><td>$ 1.9</td><td>cash</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $ 110.4 million and $ 113.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2006 , the company acquired two shopping center properties located in bay shore and centereach , ny . included in noncontrolling interests was approximately $ 41.6 million , including a discount of $ 0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $ 3.8 million , in redeemable units ( the 201credeemable units 201d ) , issued by the company in connection with these transactions . the prop- erties were acquired through the issuance of $ 24.2 million of redeemable units , which are redeemable at the option of the holder ; approximately $ 14.0 million of fixed rate redeemable units and the assumption of approximately $ 23.4 million of non-recourse debt . the redeemable units consist of ( i ) 13963 class a units , par value $ 1000 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 5% ( 5 % ) per annum of the class a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2011 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2016 , and ( ii ) 647758 class b units , valued at an issuance price of $ 37.24 per unit , which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2007 , for cash or at the option of the company for common stock at a ratio of 1:1 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2026 . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until april 2016 and april 2026 for the centereach , ny , and bay shore , ny , assets , respectively . during 2007 , 30000 units , or $ 1.1 million par value , of theclass bunits were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the company . noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $ 40.4 million and $ 40.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . noncontrolling interests also includes 138015 convertible units issued during 2006 , by the company , which were valued at approxi- mately $ 5.3 million , including a fair market value adjustment of $ 0.3 million , related to an interest acquired in an office building located in albany , ny . these units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the company for the company 2019s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 . the holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the company 2019s common stock . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until january 2017. .\nQuestion: what was the value of noncontrolling interests relating to the remaining units in 2010?\nAnswer: 110.4\nQuestion: what was the value in 2009?\nAnswer: 113.1\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-2.7" } ]
CONVFINQA9278	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndevelopment of prior year incurred losses was $ 135.6 million unfavorable in 2006 , $ 26.4 million favorable in 2005 and $ 249.4 million unfavorable in 2004 . such losses were the result of the reserve development noted above , as well as inher- ent uncertainty in establishing loss and lae reserves . reserves for asbestos and environmental losses and loss adjustment expenses as of year end 2006 , 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) of reserves reflect an estimate for the company 2019s ultimate liability for a&e claims for which ulti- mate value cannot be estimated using traditional reserving techniques . the company 2019s a&e liabilities stem from mt . mckinley 2019s direct insurance business and everest re 2019s assumed reinsurance business . there are significant uncertainties in estimating the amount of the company 2019s potential losses from a&e claims . see item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014asbestos and environmental exposures 201d and note 3 of notes to consolidated financial statements . mt . mckinley 2019s book of direct a&e exposed insurance is relatively small and homogenous . it also arises from a limited period , effective 1978 to 1984 . the book is based principally on excess liability policies , thereby limiting exposure analysis to a lim- ited number of policies and forms . as a result of this focused structure , the company believes that it is able to comprehen- sively analyze its exposures , allowing it to identify , analyze and actively monitor those claims which have unusual exposure , including policies in which it may be exposed to pay expenses in addition to policy limits or non-products asbestos claims . the company endeavors to be actively engaged with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing eight sip agreements , three of which were executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to exe- cute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders , including those that may not have reported significant a&e losses . everest re 2019s book of assumed reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a modest number of a&e exposed relationships . it also arises from a limited period , effectively 1977 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeli- ness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 125.2</td><td>$ 148.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>152.1</td><td>157.6</td><td>151.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>213.7</td><td>243.5</td><td>272.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>148.7</td><td>123.3</td><td>156.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>650.1</td><td>649.6</td><td>728.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-138.7 ( 138.7 )</td><td>-199.1 ( 199.1 )</td><td>-221.6 ( 221.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 511.4</td><td>$ 450.5</td><td>$ 506.7</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves determined by the company to be needed over and above those reported by the ceding company . 81790fin_a 4/13/07 11:08 am page 15 .\nQuestion: what were net reserves in 2006?\nAnswer: 511.4\nQuestion: what were net reserves in 2005?\nAnswer: 450.5\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "60.9" } ]
CONVFINQA6089	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n38 2015 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 324 million , $ 297 million and $ 235 million in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 505</td><td>$ 509</td><td>$ 479</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>19</td><td>17</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 486</td><td>$ 492</td><td>$ 463</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .\nQuestion: what was the value for research and development in 2014?\nAnswer: 509.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2013?\nAnswer: 479.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\nAnswer: 30.0\nQuestion: what was the 2013 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "479.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5375	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n3 . dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>subsidiaries</td><td>$ 807</td><td>$ 771</td><td>$ 1038</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>affiliates</td><td>43</td><td>44</td><td>21</td></tr></table> 4 . guarantees and letters of credit guarantees 2014in connection with certain of its project financing , acquisition , and power purchase agreements , the company has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments , most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events . these obligations and commitments , excluding those collateralized by letter of credit and other obligations discussed below , were limited as of december 31 , 2003 , by the terms of the agreements , to an aggregate of approximately $ 515 million representing 55 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 100 million . of this amount , $ 147 million represents credit enhancements for non-recourse debt , and $ 38 million commitments to fund its equity in projects currently under development or in construction . letters of credit 2014at december 31 , 2003 , the company had $ 89 million in letters of credit outstanding representing 9 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 36 million , which operate to guarantee performance relating to certain project development and construction activities and subsidiary operations . the company pays a letter of credit fee ranging from 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) to 5.00% ( 5.00 % ) per annum on the outstanding amounts . in addition , the company had $ 4 million in surety bonds outstanding at december 31 , 2003. .\nQuestion: what was the high end of the range of exposures for the outstanding letters of credit?\nAnswer: 36.0\nQuestion: what was the low end?\nAnswer: 1.0\nQuestion: what is the difference?\nAnswer: 35.0\nQuestion: what is the number times 1000000?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "35000000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7221	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nroyal caribbean cruises ltd . notes to the consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 9 . stock-based employee compensation we have four stock-based compensation plans , which provide for awards to our officers , directors and key employees . the plans consist of a 1990 employee stock option plan , a 1995 incentive stock option plan , a 2000 stock award plan , and a 2008 equity plan . the 1990 stock option plan and the 1995 incentive stock option plan terminated by their terms in march 2000 and february 2005 , respectively . the 2000 stock award plan , as amended , and the 2008 equity plan provide for the issuance of ( i ) incentive and non-qualified stock options , ( ii ) stock appreciation rights , ( iii ) restricted stock , ( iv ) restricted stock units and ( v ) up to 13000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2000 stock award plan and up to 5000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2008 equity plan . during any calendar year , no one individual shall be granted awards of more than 500000 shares . options and restricted stock units outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 vest in equal installments over four to five years from the date of grant . generally , options and restricted stock units are forfeited if the recipient ceases to be a director or employee before the shares vest . options are granted at a price not less than the fair value of the shares on the date of grant and expire not later than ten years after the date of grant . we also provide an employee stock purchase plan to facilitate the purchase by employees of up to 800000 shares of common stock in the aggregate . offerings to employees are made on a quarterly basis . subject to certain limitations , the purchase price for each share of common stock is equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the average of the market prices of the common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange on the first business day of the purchase period and the last business day of each month of the purchase period . shares of common stock of 65005 , 36836 and 20759 were issued under the espp at a weighted-average price of $ 12.78 , $ 20.97 and $ 37.25 during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . under the chief executive officer 2019s employment agreement we contributed 10086 shares of our common stock quarterly , to a maximum of 806880 shares , to a trust on his behalf . in january 2009 , the employment agreement and related trust agreement were amended . consequently , 768018 shares were distributed from the trust and future quarterly share distributions are issued directly to the chief executive officer . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 was $ 16.8 million . of this amount , $ 16.2 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 0.6 million was included within payroll and related expenses . total compensation expense recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2008 was $ 5.7 million . of this amount , $ 6.4 million , which included a benefit of approximately $ 8.2 million due to a change in the employee forfeiture rate assumption was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and income of $ 0.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses which also included a benefit of approximately $ 1.0 million due to the change in the forfeiture rate . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2007 was $ 19.0 million . of this amount , $ 16.3 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 2.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses . the fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the estimated fair value of stock options , less estimated forfeitures , is amortized over the vesting period using the graded-vesting method . the assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model are as follows : expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and implied volatilities . the risk-free interest rate is based on united states treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected option life assumed at the date of grant . the expected term was calculated based on historical experience and represents the time period options actually remain outstanding . we estimate forfeitures based on historical pre-vesting forfeiture rates and revise those estimates as appropriate to reflect actual experience . in 2008 , we increased our estimated forfeiture rate from 4% ( 4 % ) for options and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) for restricted stock units to 20% ( 20 % ) to reflect changes in employee retention rates. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected stock price volatility</td><td>55.0% ( 55.0 % )</td><td>31.4% ( 31.4 % )</td><td>28.0% ( 28.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.8% ( 1.8 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td><td>4.8% ( 4.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option life</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: combined, what was the risk-free interest rate in 2008 and 2009?\nAnswer: 4.6\nQuestion: and in 2007?\nAnswer: 4.8\nQuestion: what was the total for all three years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9.4" } ]
CONVFINQA1948	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconnection with this matter could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated cash flows and results of operations . item 4 . submission of matters to a vote of security holders on november 14 , 2008 , our stockholders voted to approve our merger with allied waste industries , inc . at a special meeting held for that purpose . results of the voting at that meeting are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>affirmative</td><td>against</td><td>abstentions</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( 1 ) to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of republic common stock contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger dated as of june 22 2008 as amended july 31 2008 among republic rs merger wedge inc a wholly owned subsidiary of republic formed for the purpose of the merger and allied waste industries inc .</td><td>141728743</td><td>297976</td><td>156165</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( 2 ) to adjourn the special meeting if necessary to solicit additional proxies in favor of the foregoing proposal</td><td>134081897</td><td>8068370</td><td>32617</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of republic common stock , contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger , dated as of june 22 , 2008 , as amended july 31 , 2008 , among republic , rs merger wedge , inc , a wholly owned subsidiary of republic , formed for the purpose of the merger , and allied waste industries , inc . . . 141728743 297976 156165 ( 2 ) to adjourn the special meeting , if necessary , to solicit additional proxies in favor of the foregoing proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134081897 8068370 32617 %%transmsg* transmitting job : p14076 pcn : 035000000 *%%pcmsg\|33 \|00022\|yes\|no\|02/28/2009 17:08\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what was the total number of votes affirmative to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "141728743.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6860	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are an international energy company with operations in the u.s. , canada , africa , the middle east and europe . our operations are organized into three reportable segments : 2022 e&p which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis . 2022 osm which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil . 2022 ig which produces and markets products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in eg . certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business . these statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain . in accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements . for additional risk factors affecting our business , see item 1a . risk factors in this annual report on form 10-k . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 . business , item 1a . risk factors and item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data found in this annual report on form 10-k . spin-off downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , the spin-off of marathon 2019s downstream business was completed , creating two independent energy companies : marathon oil and mpc . marathon shareholders at the close of business on the record date of june 27 , 2011 received one share of mpc common stock for every two shares of marathon common stock held . fractional shares of mpc common stock were not distributed and any fractional share of mpc common stock otherwise issuable to a marathon shareholder was sold in the open market on such shareholder 2019s behalf , and such shareholder received a cash payment with respect to that fractional share . a private letter tax ruling received in june 2011 from the irs affirmed the tax-free nature of the spin-off . activities related to the downstream business have been treated as discontinued operations in all periods presented in this annual report on form 10-k ( see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2014note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information ) . overview 2013 market conditions exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows . prices of crude oil have been volatile in recent years . in 2011 , crude prices increased over 2010 levels , with increases in brent averages outstripping those in wti . during much of 2010 , both wti and brent crude oil monthly average prices remained in the $ 75 to $ 85 per barrel range . crude oil prices reached a low of $ 33.98 in february 2009 , following global demand declines in an economic recession , but recovered quickly ending 2009 at $ 79.36 . the following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price annual averages for the past three years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 95.11</td><td>$ 79.61</td><td>$ 62.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>111.26</td><td>79.51</td><td>61.49</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a )</td><td>$ 4.04</td><td>$ 4.39</td><td>$ 3.99</td></tr></table> wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) $ 95.11 $ 79.61 $ 62.09 brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) 111.26 79.51 61.49 henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) $ 4.04 $ 4.39 $ 3.99 ( a ) settlement date average . our u.s . crude oil production was approximately 58 percent sour in 2011 and 68 percent in 2010 . sour crude contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does . sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values . our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude benchmark . the differential between wti and brent average prices widened significantly in 2011 to $ 16.15 in comparison to differentials of less than $ 1.00 in 2010 and 2009. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the wti crude oil benchmark from 2009 to 2011?\nAnswer: 33.02\nQuestion: what is the wti crude oil benchmark in 2009?\nAnswer: 62.09\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.53181\nQuestion: what is the brent crude oil benchmark in 2011?\nAnswer: 111.26\nQuestion: what about in 2010?\nAnswer: 79.51\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "31.75" } ]
CONVFINQA571	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncelanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 2022 amend certain material agreements governing bcp crystal 2019s indebtedness ; 2022 change the business conducted by celanese holdings and its subsidiaries ; and 2022 enter into hedging agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2005 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . the maturation of the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total ( in$ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2007</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2008</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2009</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2010</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter ( 1 )</td><td>3163</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>3437</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . defined benefit pension plans exist at certain locations in north america and europe . as of december 31 , 2005 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 85% ( 85 % ) and 75% ( 75 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . actuarial valuations for these plans are prepared annually . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in europe and north america covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . contributions to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and they aggregated $ 12 million for the year ended decem- ber 31 , 2005 , $ 8 million for the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 , $ 3 million for the three months ended march 31 , 2004 and $ 11 million for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in connection with the acquisition of cag , the purchaser agreed to pre-fund $ 463 million of certain pension obligations . during the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 , $ 409 million was pre-funded to the company 2019s pension plans . the company contributed an additional $ 54 million to the non-qualified pension plan 2019s rabbi trusts in february 2005 . in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of vinamul and acetex , the company assumed certain assets and obligations related to the acquired pension plans . the company recorded liabilities of $ 128 million for these pension plans . total pension assets acquired amounted to $ 85 million. .\nQuestion: what percentage of the maturation of the company 2019s debt, including short-term borrowings that will occur after 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.92028" } ]
CONVFINQA6047	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis operating activities cash flow from operations increased $ 8.8 million in 2004 compared to 2003 primarily due to income tax benefits received in 2004 , and increased recovery of deferred fuel costs . this increase was substantially offset by money pool activity . in 2003 , the domestic utility companies and system energy filed , with the irs , a change in tax accounting method notification for their respective calculations of cost of goods sold . the adjustment implemented a simplified method of allocation of overhead to the production of electricity , which is provided under the irs capitalization regulations . the cumulative adjustment placing these companies on the new methodology resulted in a $ 1.171 billion deduction for entergy arkansas on entergy's 2003 income tax return . there was no cash benefit from the method change in 2003 . in 2004 , entergy arkansas realized $ 173 million in cash tax benefit from the method change . this tax accounting method change is an issue across the utility industry and will likely be challenged by the irs on audit . as of december 31 , 2004 , entergy arkansas has a net operating loss ( nol ) carryforward for tax purposes of $ 766.9 million , principally resulting from the change in tax accounting method related to cost of goods sold . if the tax accounting method change is sustained , entergy arkansas expects to utilize the nol carryforward through 2006 . cash flow from operations increased $ 80.1 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to income taxes paid of $ 2.2 million in 2003 compared to income taxes paid of $ 83.9 million in 2002 , and money pool activity . this increase was partially offset by decreased recovery of deferred fuel costs in 2003 . entergy arkansas' receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 23561</td><td>( $ 69153 )</td><td>$ 4279</td><td>$ 23794</td></tr></table> money pool activity used $ 92.7 million of entergy arkansas' operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 73.4 million in 2003 , and provided $ 19.5 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities the decrease of $ 68.1 million in net cash used in investing activities in 2004 compared to 2003 was primarily due to a decrease in construction expenditures resulting from less transmission upgrade work requested by merchant generators in 2004 combined with lower spending on customer support projects in 2004 . the increase of $ 88.1 million in net cash used in investing activities in 2003 compared to 2002 was primarily due to an increase in construction expenditures of $ 57.4 million and the maturity of $ 38.4 million of other temporary investments in the first quarter of 2002 . construction expenditures increased in 2003 primarily due to the following : 2022 a ferc ruling that shifted responsibility for transmission upgrade work performed for independent power producers to entergy arkansas ; and 2022 the ano 1 steam generator , reactor vessel head , and transformer replacement project . financing activities the decrease of $ 90.7 million in net cash used in financing activities in 2004 compared to 2003 was primarily due to the net redemption of $ 2.4 million of long-term debt in 2004 compared to $ 109.3 million in 2003 , partially offset by the payment of $ 16.2 million more in common stock dividends during the same period. .\nQuestion: what is the difference in receivables from the money pool between 2001 and 2022?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "19515.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6214	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o 2019reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 215</td><td>$ 283</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 269</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>144</td><td>158</td><td>197</td><td>206</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 187</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the change in value of an investment in s&p500 from 2016 to 2017?\nAnswer: 30.0\nQuestion: what is the value of the investment in s&p500 at the end of 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "157.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10041	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npotentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site- specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us with measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . annual expenses for personal injury-related events were $ 240 million in 2006 , $ 247 million in 2005 , and $ 288 million in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had accrued liabilities of $ 631 million and $ 619 million for future personal injury costs , respectively , of which $ 233 million and $ 274 million was recorded in current liabilities as accrued casualty costs , respectively . our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 87% ( 87 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 13% ( 13 % ) related to unasserted claims . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation . our personal injury claims activity was as follows : claims activity 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>claims activity</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>open claims beginning balance</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td><td>4085</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new claims</td><td>4190</td><td>4584</td><td>4366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>settled or dismissed claims</td><td>-4261 ( 4261 )</td><td>-4415 ( 4415 )</td><td>-4423 ( 4423 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>open claims ending balance at december 31</td><td>4126</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td></tr></table> depreciation 2013 the railroad industry is capital intensive . properties are carried at cost . provisions for depreciation are computed principally on the straight-line method based on estimated service lives of depreciable property . the lives are calculated using a separate composite annual percentage rate for each depreciable property group , based on the results of internal depreciation studies . we are required to submit a report on depreciation studies and proposed depreciation rates to the stb for review and approval every three years for equipment property and every six years for road property . the cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable railroad property retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation , and no gain or loss is recognized . a gain or loss is recognized in other income for all other property upon disposition because the gain or loss is not part of rail operations . the cost of internally developed software is capitalized and amortized over a five-year period . significant capital spending in recent years increased the total value of our depreciable assets . cash capital spending totaled $ 2.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , depreciation expense was $ 1.2 billion . we use various methods to estimate useful lives for each group of depreciable property . due to the capital intensive nature of the business and the large base of depreciable assets , variances to those estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . if the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year , annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $ 43 million . if the estimated useful lives of all assets to be depreciated were decreased by one year , annual depreciation expense would increase by approximately $ 45 million . income taxes 2013 as required under fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , we account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns . these .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of the open claims ending balance from 2005 to 2006?\nAnswer: -71.0\nQuestion: was was the 2005 balance?\nAnswer: 4197.0\nQuestion: what is the net change over the 2005 balance?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.01692" } ]
CONVFINQA10096	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 . acquisitions ( continued ) transaction closed on january 23 , 2017 , and the consideration paid included the issuance of approximately 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock ( fair value of $ 266.5 million ) and cash of $ 86.2 million . the company recognized in 201ccontingent consideration liabilities 201d a $ 162.9 million liability for the estimated fair value of the contingent milestone payments . the fair value of the contingent milestone payments will be remeasured each quarter , with changes in the fair value recognized within operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations . for further information on the fair value of the contingent milestone payments , see note 10 . in connection with the acquisition , the company placed $ 27.6 million of the purchase price into escrow to satisfy any claims for indemnification made in accordance with the merger agreement . any funds remaining 15 months after the acquisition date will be disbursed to valtech 2019s former shareholders . acquisition-related costs of $ 0.6 million and $ 4.1 million were recorded in 201cselling , general , and administrative expenses 201d during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . prior to the close of the transaction , valtech spun off its early- stage transseptal mitral valve replacement technology program . concurrent with the closing , the company entered into an agreement for an exclusive option to acquire that program and its associated intellectual property for approximately $ 200.0 million , subject to certain adjustments , plus an additional $ 50.0 million if a certain european regulatory approval is obtained within 10 years of the acquisition closing date . the option expires two years after the closing date of the transaction , but can be extended by up to one year depending on the results of certain clinical trials . valtech is a developer of a transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve repair system . the company plans to add this technology to its portfolio of mitral and tricuspid repair products . the acquisition was accounted for as a business combination . tangible and intangible assets acquired were recorded based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date . the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded to goodwill . the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 22.7</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property and equipment net</td><td>1.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill</td><td>316.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>developed technology</td><td>109.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ipr&d</td><td>87.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities assumed</td><td>-5.1 ( 5.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-17.6 ( 17.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>515.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less : cash acquired</td><td>-4.3 ( 4.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total purchase price net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 511.3</td></tr></table> goodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition . goodwill was assigned to the company 2019s rest of world segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . ipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods . the fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach . this approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return . the discount rates used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d ranged from 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) to 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) . completion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies .\nQuestion: what was the total of acquisition-related costs recorded in 201cselling, general, and administrative expenses 201d in 2017?\nAnswer: 0.6\nQuestion: and what was that in 2016?\nAnswer: 4.1\nQuestion: what was, then, the combined total of acquisition-related costs recorded in 201cselling, general, and administrative expenses 201d for the two years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.7" } ]
CONVFINQA10587	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis other income ( deductions ) changed from $ 47.6 million in 2002 to ( $ 36.0 million ) in 2003 primarily due to a decrease in \"miscellaneous - net\" as a result of a $ 107.7 million accrual in the second quarter of 2003 for the loss that would be associated with a final , non-appealable decision disallowing abeyed river bend plant costs . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more details regarding the river bend abeyed plant costs . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest and dividend income as a result of the implementation of sfas 143 . interest on long-term debt decreased from $ 462.0 million in 2002 to $ 433.5 million in 2003 primarily due to the redemption and refinancing of long-term debt . non-utility nuclear following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>4058</td><td>4001</td><td>3955</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average realized price per mwh</td><td>$ 41.26</td><td>$ 39.38</td><td>$ 40.07</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>32524</td><td>32379</td><td>29953</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td></tr></table> 2004 compared to 2003 the decrease in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 300.8 million to $ 245.0 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle that increased earnings in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . earnings before the cumulative effect of accounting change increased by $ 98.7 million primarily due to the following : 2022 lower operation and maintenance expenses , which decreased from $ 681.8 million in 2003 to $ 595.7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2003 in connection with the voluntary severance program ; 2022 higher revenues , which increased from $ 1.275 billion in 2003 to $ 1.342 billion in 2004 , primarily resulting from higher contract pricing . the addition of a support services contract for the cooper nuclear station and increased generation in 2004 due to power uprates completed in 2003 and fewer planned and unplanned outages in 2004 also contributed to the higher revenues ; and 2022 miscellaneous income resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant , as discussed in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . partially offsetting this increase were the following : 2022 higher income taxes , which increased from $ 88.6 million in 2003 to $ 142.6 million in 2004 ; and 2022 higher depreciation expense , which increased from $ 34.3 million in 2003 to $ 48.9 million in 2004 , due to additions to plant in service . 2003 compared to 2002 the increase in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 200.5 million to $ 300.8 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recognized in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . income before the cumulative effect of accounting change decreased by $ 54.2 million . the decrease was primarily due to $ 83.0 million ( $ 50.6 million net-of-tax ) of charges recorded in connection with the voluntary severance program . except for the effect of the voluntary severance program , operation and maintenance expenses in 2003 per mwh of generation were in line with 2002 operation and maintenance expenses. .\nQuestion: what value of gwh was generated in 2004?\nAnswer: 32524.0\nQuestion: what about in 2003?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "32379.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9393	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 2 . properties . we conduct our primary operations at the owned and leased facilities described below . location operations conducted approximate square feet expiration new haven , connecticut corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices 514000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>operations conducted</td><td>approximatesquare feet</td><td>leaseexpirationdates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>new haven connecticut</td><td>corporate headquarters and executive sales research and development offices</td><td>514000</td><td>2030</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dublin ireland</td><td>global supply chain distribution and administration offices</td><td>215000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lexington massachusetts</td><td>research and development offices</td><td>81000</td><td>2019</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>bogart georgia</td><td>commercial research and development manufacturing</td><td>70000</td><td>2024</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>smithfield rhode island</td><td>commercial research and development manufacturing</td><td>67000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>zurich switzerland</td><td>regional executive and sales offices</td><td>69000</td><td>2025</td></tr></table> we believe that our administrative office space is adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future . we also believe that our research and development facilities and our manufacturing facility , together with third party manufacturing facilities , will be adequate for our on-going activities . in addition to the locations above , we also lease space in other u.s . locations and in foreign countries to support our operations as a global organization . as of december 31 , 2015 , we also leased approximately 254000 square feet in cheshire , connecticut , which was the previous location of our corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices . in december 2015 , we entered into an early termination of this lease and will occupy this space through may 2016 . in april 2014 , we purchased a fill/finish facility in athlone , ireland . following refurbishment of the facility , and after successful completion of the appropriate validation processes and regulatory approvals , the facility will become our first company-owned fill/finish and packaging facility for our commercial and clinical products . in may 2015 , we announced plans to construct a new biologics manufacturing facility on our existing property in dublin ireland , which is expected to be completed by 2020 . item 3 . legal proceedings . in may 2015 , we received a subpoena in connection with an investigation by the enforcement division of the sec requesting information related to our grant-making activities and compliance with the fcpa in various countries . the sec also seeks information related to alexion 2019s recalls of specific lots of soliris and related securities disclosures . in addition , in october 2015 , alexion received a request from the doj for the voluntary production of documents and other information pertaining to alexion's compliance with the fcpa . alexion is cooperating with these investigations . at this time , alexion is unable to predict the duration , scope or outcome of these investigations . given the ongoing nature of these investigations , management does not currently believe a loss related to these matters is probable or that the potential magnitude of such loss or range of loss , if any , can be reasonably estimated . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of square footage for the new haven and lexington properties?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "595000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9312	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) sales of businesses and investments 2013 primarily includes realized gains and losses relating to the sales of businesses , cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of entities and sales of marketable securities and investments in publicly traded and privately held companies in our rabbi trusts . during 2009 , we realized a gain of $ 15.2 related to the sale of an investment in our rabbi trusts , which was partially offset by losses realized from the sale of various businesses . losses in 2007 primarily related to the sale of several businesses within draftfcb for a loss of $ 9.3 and charges at lowe of $ 7.8 as a result of the realization of cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of several businesses . vendor discounts and credit adjustments 2013 we are in the process of settling our liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits established during the restatement we presented in our 2004 annual report on form 10-k . these adjustments reflect the reversal of certain of these liabilities as a result of settlements with clients or vendors or where the statute of limitations has lapsed . litigation settlement 2013 during may 2008 , the sec concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices , resulting in a settlement charge of $ 12.0 . investment impairments 2013 in 2007 we realized an other-than-temporary charge of $ 5.8 relating to a $ 12.5 investment in auction rate securities , representing our total investment in auction rate securities . see note 12 for further information . note 5 : intangible assets goodwill goodwill is the excess purchase price remaining from an acquisition after an allocation of purchase price has been made to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values . the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for our segments , integrated agency networks ( 201cian 201d ) and constituency management group ( 201ccmg 201d ) , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 are listed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ian</td><td>cmg</td><td>total 1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 2789.7</td><td>$ 441.9</td><td>$ 3231.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year acquisitions</td><td>99.5</td><td>1.8</td><td>101.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>28.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>30.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>-128.1 ( 128.1 )</td><td>-13.9 ( 13.9 )</td><td>-142.0 ( 142.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>$ 2790.0</td><td>$ 430.9</td><td>$ 3220.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current year acquisitions2</td><td>5.2</td><td>2014</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>14.2</td><td>2014</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>76.2</td><td>4.5</td><td>80.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 2885.6</td><td>$ 435.4</td><td>$ 3321.0</td></tr></table> 1 for all periods presented we have not recorded a goodwill impairment charge . 2 for acquisitions completed after january 1 , 2009 , amount includes contingent and deferred payments , which are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date . see note 6 for further information . see note 1 for further information regarding our annual impairment methodology . other intangible assets included in other intangible assets are assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and assets with definite lives subject to amortization . other intangible assets primarily include customer lists and trade names . intangible assets with definitive lives subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated useful lives generally between 7 and 15 years . amortization expense for other intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 19.3 , $ 14.4 and $ 8.5 , respectively . the following table provides a summary of other intangible assets , which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. .\nQuestion: what was the amortization expense for other intangible assets in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "19.3" } ]
CONVFINQA7611	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nreasonably possible that such matters will be resolved in the next twelve months , but we do not anticipate that the resolution of these matters would result in any material impact on our results of operations or financial position . foreign jurisdictions have statutes of limitations generally ranging from 3 to 5 years . years still open to examination by foreign tax authorities in major jurisdictions include australia ( 2003 onward ) , canada ( 2002 onward ) , france ( 2006 onward ) , germany ( 2005 onward ) , italy ( 2005 onward ) , japan ( 2002 onward ) , puerto rico ( 2005 onward ) , singapore ( 2003 onward ) , switzerland ( 2006 onward ) and the united kingdom ( 2006 onward ) . our tax returns are currently under examination in various foreign jurisdictions . the most significant foreign tax jurisdiction under examination is the united kingdom . it is reasonably possible that such audits will be resolved in the next twelve months , but we do not anticipate that the resolution of these audits would result in any material impact on our results of operations or financial position . 13 . capital stock and earnings per share we are authorized to issue 250 million shares of preferred stock , none of which were issued or outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 . the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net earnings available to common stockholders . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the denominator for diluted earnings per share is weighted average shares outstanding adjusted for the effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards . the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations for the years ending december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share</td><td>227.3</td><td>235.5</td><td>243.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards</td><td>1.0</td><td>2.0</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share</td><td>228.3</td><td>237.5</td><td>245.4</td></tr></table> weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share 227.3 235.5 243.0 effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards 1.0 2.0 2.4 weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share 228.3 237.5 245.4 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , an average of 11.2 million options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common stock . for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , an average of 3.1 million and 7.6 million options , respectively , were not included . during 2008 , we repurchased approximately 10.8 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 68.72 per share for a total cash outlay of $ 737.0 million , including commissions . in april 2008 , we announced that our board of directors authorized a $ 1.25 billion share repurchase program which expires december 31 , 2009 . approximately $ 1.13 billion remains authorized under this plan . 14 . segment data we design , develop , manufacture and market orthopaedic and dental reconstructive implants , spinal implants , trauma products and related surgical products which include surgical supplies and instruments designed to aid in orthopaedic surgical procedures and post-operation rehabilitation . we also provide other healthcare-related services . revenue related to these services currently represents less than 1 percent of our total net sales . we manage operations through three major geographic segments 2013 the americas , which is comprised principally of the united states and includes other north , central and south american markets ; europe , which is comprised principally of europe and includes the middle east and africa ; and asia pacific , which is comprised primarily of japan and includes other asian and pacific markets . this structure is the basis for our reportable segment information discussed below . management evaluates operating segment performance based upon segment operating profit exclusive of operating expenses pertaining to global operations and corporate expenses , share-based compensation expense , settlement , certain claims , acquisition , integration and other expenses , inventory step-up , in-process research and development write-offs and intangible asset amortization expense . global operations include research , development engineering , medical education , brand management , corporate legal , finance , and human resource functions , and u.s . and puerto rico-based manufacturing operations and logistics . intercompany transactions have been eliminated from segment operating profit . management reviews accounts receivable , inventory , property , plant and equipment , goodwill and intangible assets by reportable segment exclusive of u.s and puerto rico-based manufacturing operations and logistics and corporate assets . z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg* transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 058000000 *%%pcmsg\|58 \|00011\|yes\|no\|02/24/2009 19:25\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what is weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share\t in 2007?\nAnswer: 237.5\nQuestion: what about in 2006?\nAnswer: 245.4\nQuestion: what is the ent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-7.9" } ]
CONVFINQA10057	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest net of capitalized interest</td><td>$ 275305</td><td>$ 252030</td><td>$ 222088</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income taxes net of refunds received</td><td>$ 188946</td><td>$ -39293 ( 39293 )</td><td>$ 41108</td></tr></table> eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2017 included non-cash additions of $ 282 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .\nQuestion: what was the interest net of capitalized interest in 2017?\nAnswer: 275305.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\nAnswer: 252030.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the 2017 amount as a portion of the 2016?\nAnswer: 1.09235\nQuestion: and what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2016 amount?\nAnswer: 0.09235\nQuestion: and concerning the subsequent year, what was the total of accrued capital expenditures in 2018 as a portion of that total in 2017?\nAnswer: 1.22423\nQuestion: and what becomes this value excluding the part representing to the 2017 total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.22423" } ]
CONVFINQA11043	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\noperating expenses millions 2012 2011 2010 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011</td><td>% ( % ) change 2011 v 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4685</td><td>$ 4681</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>-% ( - % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>3608</td><td>3581</td><td>2486</td><td>1</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>2143</td><td>2005</td><td>1836</td><td>7</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1760</td><td>1617</td><td>1487</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1197</td><td>1167</td><td>1142</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>788</td><td>782</td><td>719</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14181</td><td>$ 13833</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>15% ( 15 % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 348 million in 2012 versus 2011 . depreciation , wage and benefit inflation , higher fuel prices and volume- related trucking services purchased by our logistics subsidiaries , contributed to higher expenses during the year . efficiency gains , volume related fuel savings ( 2% ( 2 % ) fewer gallons of fuel consumed ) and $ 38 million of weather related expenses in 2011 , which favorably affects the comparison , partially offset the cost increase . operating expenses increased $ 1.8 billion in 2011 versus 2010 . our fuel price per gallon rose 36% ( 36 % ) during 2011 , accounting for $ 922 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , volume-related costs , depreciation , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses . expenses increased $ 20 million for costs related to the flooding in the midwest and $ 18 million due to the impact of severe heat and drought in the south , primarily texas . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . a $ 45 million one-time payment relating to a transaction with csx intermodal , inc ( csxi ) increased operating expenses during the first quarter of 2010 , which favorably affects the comparison of operating expenses in 2011 to those in 2010 . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . expenses in 2012 were essentially flat versus 2011 as operational improvements and cost reductions offset general wage and benefit inflation and higher pension and other postretirement benefits . in addition , weather related costs increased these expenses in 2011 . a combination of general wage and benefit inflation , volume-related expenses , higher training costs associated with new hires , additional crew costs due to speed restrictions caused by the midwest flooding and heat and drought in the south , and higher pension expense drove the increase during 2011 compared to 2010 . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.22 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2012 , compared to $ 3.12 in 2011 , increased expenses by $ 105 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2012 versus 2011 , driving expense down . the fuel consumption rate was flat year-over-year . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.12 ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2011 , compared to $ 2.29 per gallon in 2010 , increased expenses by $ 922 million . in addition , higher gasoline prices for highway and non-highway vehicles also increased year-over-year . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 5% ( 5 % ) in 2011 versus 2010 , driving expense up by $ 122 million . purchased services and materials 2013 expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers ( including equipment 2012 operating expenses .\nQuestion: what was the change in the equipment and other rents segment from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: 30.0\nQuestion: and what was the change in the total expense in that same period?\nAnswer: 348.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total expense change was due to the change in that segment?\nAnswer: 0.08621\nQuestion: and in that same two year period, what was the change in the higher locomotive diesel fuel prices?\nAnswer: 0.1\nQuestion: and how much did the increase in the expenses, in millions of dollars, represent in relation to this change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1050.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2848	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n$ 43.3 million in 2011 compared to $ 34.1 million in 2010 . the retail segment represented 13% ( 13 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of the company 2019s total net sales in 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the retail segment 2019s operating income was $ 4.7 billion , $ 3.2 billion , and $ 2.3 billion during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 respectively . these year-over-year increases in retail operating income were primarily attributable to higher overall net sales that resulted in significantly higher average revenue per store during the respective years . gross margin gross margin for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 156508</td><td>$ 108249</td><td>$ 65225</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>87846</td><td>64431</td><td>39541</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 68662</td><td>$ 43818</td><td>$ 25684</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>43.9% ( 43.9 % )</td><td>40.5% ( 40.5 % )</td><td>39.4% ( 39.4 % )</td></tr></table> the gross margin percentage in 2012 was 43.9% ( 43.9 % ) , compared to 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) in 2011 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs , a higher mix of iphone sales , and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . the increase in gross margin was partially offset by the impact of a stronger u.s . dollar . the gross margin percentage during the first half of 2012 was 45.9% ( 45.9 % ) compared to 41.4% ( 41.4 % ) during the second half of 2012 . the primary drivers of higher gross margin in the first half of 2012 compared to the second half are a higher mix of iphone sales and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . additionally , gross margin in the second half of 2012 was also affected by the introduction of new products with flat pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers , price reductions on certain existing products , higher transition costs associated with product launches , and continued strengthening of the u.s . dollar ; partially offset by lower commodity costs . the gross margin percentage in 2011 was 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) , compared to 39.4% ( 39.4 % ) in 2010 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs . the company expects to experience decreases in its gross margin percentage in future periods , as compared to levels achieved during 2012 , and the company anticipates gross margin of about 36% ( 36 % ) during the first quarter of 2013 . expected future declines in gross margin are largely due to a higher mix of new and innovative products with flat or reduced pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers and anticipated component cost and other cost increases . future strengthening of the u.s . dollar could further negatively impact gross margin . the foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin percentage in future periods , including the first quarter of 2013 , are forward-looking and could differ from actual results because of several factors including , but not limited to those set forth above in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors 201d and those described in this paragraph . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global product pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , product transitions and potential increases in the cost of components , as well as potential increases in the costs of outside manufacturing services and a potential shift in the company 2019s sales mix towards products with lower gross margins . in response to competitive pressures , the company expects it will continue to take product pricing actions , which would adversely affect gross margins . gross margins could also be affected by the company 2019s ability to manage product quality and warranty costs effectively and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . due to the company 2019s significant international operations , financial results can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates. .\nQuestion: what was the difference between the net sales of 2011 and 2010, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "43024.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9441	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( c ) effective january 1 , 2019 , these assets were transferred from the products pipelines business segment to the natural gas pipelines business segment . ( d ) effective january 1 , 2019 , a small number of terminals were transferred between the products pipelines and terminals business segments . competition our products pipelines 2019 pipeline operations compete against proprietary pipelines owned and operated by major oil companies , other independent products pipelines , trucking and marine transportation firms ( for short-haul movements of products ) and railcars . our products pipelines 2019 terminal operations compete with proprietary terminals owned and operated by major oil companies and other independent terminal operators , and our transmix operations compete with refineries owned by major oil companies and independent transmix facilities . terminals our terminals business segment includes the operations of our refined petroleum product , crude oil , chemical , ethanol and other liquid terminal facilities ( other than those included in the products pipelines business segment ) and all of our petroleum coke , metal and ores facilities . our terminals are located throughout the u.s . and in portions of canada . we believe the location of our facilities and our ability to provide flexibility to customers help attract new and retain existing customers at our terminals and provide expansion opportunities . we often classify our terminal operations based on the handling of either liquids or dry-bulk material products . in addition , terminals 2019 marine operations include jones act-qualified product tankers that provide marine transportation of crude oil , condensate and refined petroleum products between u.s . ports . the following summarizes our terminals business segment assets , as of december 31 , 2018 : number capacity ( mmbbl ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number</td><td>capacity ( mmbbl )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>liquids terminals ( a )</td><td>52</td><td>89.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>bulk terminals</td><td>34</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>jones act tankers</td><td>16</td><td>5.3</td></tr></table> _______ ( a ) effective january 1 , 2019 , a small number of terminals were transferred between the terminals and products pipelines business segments . competition we are one of the largest independent operators of liquids terminals in north america , based on barrels of liquids terminaling capacity . our liquids terminals compete with other publicly or privately held independent liquids terminals , and terminals owned by oil , chemical , pipeline , and refining companies . our bulk terminals compete with numerous independent terminal operators , terminals owned by producers and distributors of bulk commodities , stevedoring companies and other industrial companies opting not to outsource terminaling services . in some locations , competitors are smaller , independent operators with lower cost structures . our jones act-qualified product tankers compete with other jones act qualified vessel fleets . our co2 business segment produces , transports , and markets co2 for use in enhanced oil recovery projects as a flooding medium for recovering crude oil from mature oil fields . our co2 pipelines and related assets allow us to market a complete package of co2 supply and transportation services to our customers . we also hold ownership interests in several oil-producing fields and own a crude oil pipeline , all located in the permian basin region of west texas. .\nQuestion: what is the number of liquid terminals?\nAnswer: 52.0\nQuestion: what is number of bulk terminals?\nAnswer: 34.0\nQuestion: what is the sum of those terminals?\nAnswer: 86.0\nQuestion: what is the number of jones act tankers?\nAnswer: 16.0\nQuestion: what is the total number of terminals and jones act tankers?\nAnswer: 102.0\nQuestion: what is the number of bulk terminals divided by the total number of terminals and jones act tankers?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.5098" } ]
CONVFINQA2241	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of united parcel service inc. in 2019?\nAnswer: 75.95\nQuestion: what is the change in value assuming a $100 initial investment?\nAnswer: -24.05\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.2405" } ]
CONVFINQA1405	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc performance stock units : in january 2017 , altria group , inc . granted an aggregate of 187886 performance stock units to eligible employees . the payout of the performance stock units requires the achievement of certain performance measures , which were predetermined at the time of grant , over a three-year performance cycle . these performance measures consist of altria group , inc . 2019s adjusted diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) compounded annual growth rate and altria group , inc . 2019s total shareholder return relative to a predetermined peer group . the performance stock units are also subject to forfeiture if certain employment conditions are not met . at december 31 , 2017 , altria group , inc . had 170755 performance stock units remaining , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 70.39 per performance stock unit . the fair value of the performance stock units at the date of grant , net of estimated forfeitures , is amortized to expense over the performance period . altria group , inc . recorded pre-tax compensation expense related to performance stock units for the year ended december 31 , 2017 of $ 6 million . the unamortized compensation expense related to altria group , inc . 2019s performance stock units was $ 7 million at december 31 , 2017 . altria group , inc . did not grant any performance stock units during 2016 and 2015 . note 12 . earnings per share basic and diluted eps were calculated using the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to altria group inc .</td><td>$ 10222</td><td>$ 14239</td><td>$ 5241</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings for basic and diluted eps</td><td>$ 10208</td><td>$ 14215</td><td>$ 5231</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps</td><td>1921</td><td>1952</td><td>1961</td></tr></table> net earnings attributable to altria group , inc . $ 10222 $ 14239 $ 5241 less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards ( 14 ) ( 24 ) ( 10 ) earnings for basic and diluted eps $ 10208 $ 14215 $ 5231 weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps 1921 1952 1961 .\nQuestion: what is the net change in earnings attributable to altria group from 2016 to 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-4017.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5884	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2011 compared to 2010 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2011 decreased $ 540 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease primarily was attributable to lower volume of approximately $ 665 million due to the absence of the dris program that supported the 2010 u.s . census and a decline in activities on the jtrs program . this decrease partially was offset by increased net sales on numerous programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 60 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2010 . operating profit increased approximately $ 180 million due to volume and the retirement of risks in 2011 and the absence of reserves recognized in 2010 on numerous programs ( including among others , odin ( about $ 60 million ) and twic and automated flight service station programs ) . the increases in operating profit partially were offset by the absence of the dris program and a decline in activities on the jtrs program of about $ 120 million . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 130 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the substantial completion of various programs in 2011 ( primarily odin , u.k . census , and jtrs ) . the decrease in backlog during 2011 compared to 2010 mainly was due to declining activities on the jtrs program and several other smaller programs . trends we expect is&gs 2019 net sales to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 primarily due to the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . operating profit is expected to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range consistent with the expected decline in net sales , resulting in margins that are comparable with 2012 results . missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support , and integration services ; logistics and other technical services ; and manned and unmanned ground vehicles . mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system ( mlrs ) , hellfire , javelin , joint air-to-surface standoff missile ( jassm ) , apache fire control system ( apache ) , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) , and sof clss . mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7457</td><td>$ 7463</td><td>$ 6930</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1256</td><td>1069</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>16.8% ( 16.8 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>14.0% ( 14.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>14700</td><td>14400</td><td>12800</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .\nQuestion: what was the change in net sales for mfc from 2010 to 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "533.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8847	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1100.6</td><td>$ 1509.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 85.7</td><td>$ 132.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>323.9</td><td>1.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1280.7</td><td>1610.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1690.3</td><td>$ 1745.1</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes and debt service . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests . notable funding requirements include : 2022 debt service 2013 our 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) senior notes in aggregate principal amount of $ 300.0 mature on november 15 , 2017 , and a $ 22.6 note classified within our other notes payable is due on june 30 , 2017 . we expect to use available cash to fund the retirement of the outstanding notes upon maturity . the remainder of our debt is primarily long-term , with maturities scheduled through 2024 . see the table below for the maturity schedule of our long-term debt . 2022 acquisitions 2013 we paid cash of $ 52.1 , net of cash acquired of $ 13.6 , for acquisitions completed in 2016 . we also paid $ 0.5 in up-front payments and $ 59.3 in deferred payments for prior-year acquisitions as well as ownership increases in our consolidated subsidiaries . in addition to potential cash expenditures for new acquisitions , we expect to pay approximately $ 77.0 in 2017 related to prior-year acquisitions . we may also be required to pay approximately $ 31.0 in 2017 related to put options held by minority shareholders if exercised . we will continue to evaluate strategic opportunities to grow and continue to strengthen our market position , particularly in our digital and marketing services offerings , and to expand our presence in high-growth and key strategic world markets . 2022 dividends 2013 during 2016 , we paid four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.15 per share on our common stock , which corresponded to aggregate dividend payments of $ 238.4 . on february 10 , 2017 , we announced that our board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) had declared a common stock cash dividend of $ 0.18 per share , payable on march 15 , 2017 to holders of record as of the close of business on march 1 , 2017 . assuming we pay a quarterly dividend of $ 0.18 per share and there is no significant change in the number of outstanding shares as of december 31 , 2016 , we would expect to pay approximately $ 280.0 over the next twelve months. .\nQuestion: what was the full amount of cash equivalents and marketable securities in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1665.8" } ]
CONVFINQA5815	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .\nQuestion: what was the change in gross reserves from 2011 to 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-57.1" } ]
CONVFINQA4929	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npackaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2005 9 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) stockholder received proceeds , net of the underwriting discount , of $ 20.69 per share . the company did not sell any shares in , or receive any proceeds from , the secondary offering . concurrent with the closing of the secondary offering on december 21 , 2005 , the company entered into a common stock repurchase agreement with pca holdings llc . pursuant to the repurchase agreement , the company purchased 4500000 shares of common stock directly from pca holdings llc at the initial price to the public net of the underwriting discount or $ 20.69 per share , the same net price per share received by pca holdings llc in the secondary offering . these shares were retired on december 21 , 2005 . 10 . commitments and contingencies capital commitments the company had authorized capital expenditures of approximately $ 33.1 million and $ 55.2 million as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in connection with the expansion and replacement of existing facilities and equipment . operating leases pca leases space for certain of its facilities and cutting rights to approximately 108000 acres of timberland under long-term leases . the company also leases equipment , primarily vehicles and rolling stock , and other assets under long-term leases of a duration generally of three years . the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 24569</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>21086</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>14716</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>9801</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>6670</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>37130</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 113972</td></tr></table> capital lease obligations were not significant to the accompanying financial statements . total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 35.8 million , $ 33.0 million and $ 31.6 million , respectively . these costs are included in cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses. .\nQuestion: what was the value of lease expense, including base rent on all leases and executory costs, such as insurance, taxes, and maintenance in 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "33.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9804	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninstitutions . international paper continually monitors its positions with and the credit quality of these financial institutions and does not expect non- performance by the counterparties . note 14 capital stock the authorized capital stock at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , consisted of 990850000 shares of common stock , $ 1 par value ; 400000 shares of cumulative $ 4 preferred stock , without par value ( stated value $ 100 per share ) ; and 8750000 shares of serial preferred stock , $ 1 par value . the serial preferred stock is issuable in one or more series by the board of directors without further shareholder action . in july 2006 , in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the company 2019s trans- formation plan , international paper 2019s board of direc- tors authorized a share repurchase program to acquire up to $ 3.0 billion of the company 2019s stock . in a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer completed in september 2006 , international paper purchased 38465260 shares of its common stock at a price of $ 36.00 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 1.4 billion . in addition , in december 2006 , the company purchased an addi- tional 1220558 shares of its common stock in the open market at an average price of $ 33.84 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 41 million . following the completion of these share repurchases , international paper had approximately 454 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding . note 15 retirement plans u.s . defined benefit plans international paper maintains pension plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially all domestic employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 . these employees generally are eligible to participate in the plans upon completion of one year of service and attainment of age 21 . employees hired after june 30 , 2004 , who are not eligible for these pension plans receive an additional company contribution to their savings plan ( see 201cother plans 201d on page 83 ) . the plans provide defined benefits based on years of credited service and either final average earnings ( salaried employees ) , hourly job rates or specified benefit rates ( hourly and union employees ) . for its qualified defined benefit pension plan , interna- tional paper makes contributions that are sufficient to fully fund its actuarially determined costs , gen- erally equal to the minimum amounts required by the employee retirement income security act ( erisa ) . in addition , international paper made volun- tary contributions of $ 1.0 billion to the qualified defined benefit plan in 2006 , and does not expect to make any contributions in 2007 . the company also has two unfunded nonqualified defined benefit pension plans : a pension restoration plan available to employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 that provides retirement benefits based on eligible compensation in excess of limits set by the internal revenue service , and a supplemental retirement plan for senior managers ( serp ) , which is an alternative retirement plan for senior vice presi- dents and above who are designated by the chief executive officer as participants . these nonqualified plans are only funded to the extent of benefits paid , which are expected to be $ 41 million in 2007 . net periodic pension expense service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the plans 2019 benefit formula to services rendered by employees during the year . interest cost represents the increase in the projected benefit obli- gation , which is a discounted amount , due to the passage of time . the expected return on plan assets reflects the computed amount of current year earn- ings from the investment of plan assets using an estimated long-term rate of return . net periodic pension expense for qualified and nonqualified u.s . defined benefit plans comprised the following : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>506</td><td>474</td><td>467</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-540 ( 540 )</td><td>-556 ( 556 )</td><td>-592 ( 592 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>actuarial loss</td><td>243</td><td>167</td><td>94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of prior service cost</td><td>27</td><td>29</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net periodic pension expense ( a )</td><td>$ 377</td><td>$ 243</td><td>$ 111</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 9.1 million , $ 6.5 million and $ 3.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 8.7 million , $ 3.6 million and $ 1.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , of termination benefits , in connection with cost reduction programs and facility rationalizations that were recorded in restructuring and other charges in the con- solidated statement of operations . also excludes $ 77.2 million and $ 14.3 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 18.6 million and $ 7.6 million of termination bene- fits in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , related to certain divest- itures recorded in net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the consolidated statement of oper- ations. .\nQuestion: what was the net periodic pension expense in 2005?\nAnswer: 243.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2004?\nAnswer: 111.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 132.0\nQuestion: how much does this change represent in relation to the net periodic pension expense in 2004, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.18919" } ]
CONVFINQA886	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbanking ) . the results of the first step of the impairment test showed no indication of impairment in any of the reporting units at any of the periods except december 31 , 2008 and , accordingly , the company did not perform the second step of the impairment test , except for the test performed as of december 31 , 2008 . as of december 31 , 2008 , there was an indication of impairment in the north america consumer banking , latin america consumer banking and emea consumer banking reporting units and , accordingly , the second step of testing was performed on these reporting units . based on the results of the second step of testing , the company recorded a $ 9.6 billion pretax ( $ 8.7 billion after tax ) goodwill impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2008 , representing the entire amount of goodwill allocated to these reporting units . the primary cause for the goodwill impairment in the above reporting units was the rapid deterioration in the financial markets , as well as in the global economic outlook particularly during the period beginning mid-november through year end 2008 . this deterioration further weakened the near-term prospects for the financial services industry . these and other factors , including the increased possibility of further government intervention , also resulted in the decline in the company 2019s market capitalization from approximately $ 90 billion at july 1 , 2008 and approximately $ 74 billion at october 31 , 2008 to approximately $ 36 billion at december 31 , 2008 . the more significant fair-value adjustments in the pro forma purchase price allocation in the second step of testing were to fair-value loans and debt and were made to identify and value identifiable intangibles . the adjustments to measure the assets , liabilities and intangibles were for the purpose of measuring the implied fair value of goodwill and such adjustments are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheet . the following table shows reporting units with goodwill balances and the excess of fair value of allocated book value as of december 31 , 2008 . reporting unit ( $ in millions ) fair value as a % ( % ) of allocated book value goodwill ( post-impairment ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>reporting unit ( $ inmillions )</td><td>fair value as a % ( % ) of allocated book value</td><td>goodwill ( post-impairment )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>north america cards</td><td>139% ( 139 % )</td><td>6765</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international cards</td><td>218% ( 218 % )</td><td>4066</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asia consumer banking</td><td>293% ( 293 % )</td><td>3106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities & banking</td><td>109% ( 109 % )</td><td>9774</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>global transaction services</td><td>994% ( 994 % )</td><td>1570</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>north america gwm</td><td>386% ( 386 % )</td><td>1259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>international gwm</td><td>171% ( 171 % )</td><td>592</td></tr></table> while no impairment was noted in step one of our securities and banking reporting unit impairment test at october 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2008 , goodwill present in that reporting unit may be particularly sensitive to further deterioration in economic conditions . under the market approach for valuing this reporting unit , the earnings multiples and transaction multiples were selected from multiples obtained using data from guideline companies and acquisitions . the selection of the actual multiple considers operating performance and financial condition such as return on equity and net income growth of securities and banking as compared to the guideline companies and acquisitions . for the valuation under the income approach , the company utilized a discount rate which it believes reflects the risk and uncertainty related to the projected cash flows , and selected 2013 as the terminal year . in 2013 , the value was derived assuming a return to historical levels of core-business profitability for the reporting unit , despite the significant losses experienced in 2008 . this assumption is based on management 2019s view that this recovery will occur based upon various macro- economic factors such as the recent u.s . government stimulus actions , restoring marketplace confidence and improved risk-management practices on an industry-wide basis . furthermore , company-specific actions such as its recently announced realignment of its businesses to optimize its global businesses for future profitable growth , will also be a factor in returning the company 2019s core securities and banking business to historical levels . small deterioration in the assumptions used in the valuations , in particular the discount rate and growth rate assumptions used in the net income projections , could significantly affect the company 2019s impairment evaluation and , hence , results . if the future were to differ adversely from management 2019s best estimate of key economic assumptions and associated cash flows were to decrease by a small margin , the company could potentially experience future material impairment charges with respect to the goodwill remaining in our securities and banking reporting unit . any such charges by themselves would not negatively affect the company 2019s tier 1 and total regulatory capital ratios , tangible capital or the company 2019s liquidity position. .\nQuestion: what was the goodwill impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2008?\nAnswer: 9.6\nQuestion: what was the value after tax?\nAnswer: 8.7\nQuestion: what is the difference?\nAnswer: 0.9\nQuestion: what was the after tax amount?\nAnswer: 8.7\nQuestion: what is the difference divided by the after tax amount?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.10345" } ]
CONVFINQA1857	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes receivable in 2014 , we entered into a $ 3.0 million promissory note with a privately held company which was recorded at cost . the interest rate on the promissory note is 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and is payable quarterly . all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the promissory note is due and payable on the earlier of august 26 , 2017 , or upon default . 5 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we lease various operating spaces in north america , europe , asia and australia under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements that expire on various dates through 2024 . these arrangements require us to pay certain operating expenses , such as taxes , repairs , and insurance and contain renewal and escalation clauses . we recognize rent expense under these arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease . as of december 31 , 2015 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 6306</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>6678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>6260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>5809</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>5580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21450</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 52083</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 6.7 million , $ 3.3 million and $ 3.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction such as our financial involvement in structural elements of asset construction , making decisions related to tenant improvement costs and purchasing insurance not reimbursable by the buyer-lessor ( the landlord ) , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction completion and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . due to our continued involvement in the property and lack of transferability of related risks and rewards of ownership to the landlord post construction , we account for the building and related improvements as a lease financing obligation . accordingly , as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 42.5 million and $ 43.6 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.3 million and $ 41.2 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation included in rent expense above , amounted to $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . there was no land lease expense for the year ended december 31 , 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the minimum payment for operating leases in 2016, converted to single digits?\nAnswer: 6.306\nQuestion: and the difference between this value and the rent expense for all operating leases in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.394" } ]
CONVFINQA1541	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 net derivative losses of $ 13 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 6817</td><td>$ 6423</td><td>$ 6305</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1314</td><td>1194</td><td>900</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>19.3% ( 19.3 % )</td><td>18.6% ( 18.6 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is closely correlated with employment levels , corporate revenue and asset values . during 2011 we began to see some improvement in pricing ; however , we would still consider this to be a 2018 2018soft market , 2019 2019 which began in 2007 . in a soft market , premium rates flatten or decrease , along with commission revenues , due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity . changes in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry , as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds . in 2011 , pricing showed signs of stabilization and improvement in both our retail and reinsurance brokerage product lines and we expect this trend to slowly continue into 2012 . additionally , beginning in late 2008 and continuing through 2011 , we faced difficult conditions as a result of unprecedented disruptions in the global economy , the repricing of credit risk and the deterioration of the financial markets . weak global economic conditions have reduced our customers 2019 demand for our brokerage products , which have had a negative impact on our operational results . risk solutions generated approximately 60% ( 60 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2011 . revenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients , commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies , and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients . our revenues vary from quarter to quarter throughout the year as a result of the timing of our clients 2019 policy renewals , the net effect of new and lost business , the timing of services provided to our clients , and the income we earn on investments , which is heavily influenced by short-term interest rates . we operate in a highly competitive industry and compete with many retail insurance brokerage and agency firms , as well as with individual brokers , agents , and direct writers of insurance coverage . specifically , we address the highly specialized product development and risk management needs of commercial enterprises , professional groups , insurance companies , governments , health care providers , and non-profit groups , among others ; provide affinity products for professional liability , life , disability .\nQuestion: what was the operating income in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1314.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9327	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndevelopment of prior year incurred losses was $ 135.6 million unfavorable in 2006 , $ 26.4 million favorable in 2005 and $ 249.4 million unfavorable in 2004 . such losses were the result of the reserve development noted above , as well as inher- ent uncertainty in establishing loss and lae reserves . reserves for asbestos and environmental losses and loss adjustment expenses as of year end 2006 , 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) of reserves reflect an estimate for the company 2019s ultimate liability for a&e claims for which ulti- mate value cannot be estimated using traditional reserving techniques . the company 2019s a&e liabilities stem from mt . mckinley 2019s direct insurance business and everest re 2019s assumed reinsurance business . there are significant uncertainties in estimating the amount of the company 2019s potential losses from a&e claims . see item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014asbestos and environmental exposures 201d and note 3 of notes to consolidated financial statements . mt . mckinley 2019s book of direct a&e exposed insurance is relatively small and homogenous . it also arises from a limited period , effective 1978 to 1984 . the book is based principally on excess liability policies , thereby limiting exposure analysis to a lim- ited number of policies and forms . as a result of this focused structure , the company believes that it is able to comprehen- sively analyze its exposures , allowing it to identify , analyze and actively monitor those claims which have unusual exposure , including policies in which it may be exposed to pay expenses in addition to policy limits or non-products asbestos claims . the company endeavors to be actively engaged with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing eight sip agreements , three of which were executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to exe- cute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders , including those that may not have reported significant a&e losses . everest re 2019s book of assumed reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a modest number of a&e exposed relationships . it also arises from a limited period , effectively 1977 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeli- ness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 125.2</td><td>$ 148.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>152.1</td><td>157.6</td><td>151.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>213.7</td><td>243.5</td><td>272.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>148.7</td><td>123.3</td><td>156.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>650.1</td><td>649.6</td><td>728.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-138.7 ( 138.7 )</td><td>-199.1 ( 199.1 )</td><td>-221.6 ( 221.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 511.4</td><td>$ 450.5</td><td>$ 506.7</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves determined by the company to be needed over and above those reported by the ceding company . 81790fin_a 4/13/07 11:08 am page 15 .\nQuestion: what was the change in net reserves from 2004 to 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-56.2" } ]
CONVFINQA5922	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhollyfrontier corporation notes to consolidated financial statements continued . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 148716</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>132547</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>119639</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>107400</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>102884</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>857454</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1468640</td></tr></table> transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements totaled $ 140.5 million , $ 135.1 million and $ 137.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts do not include contractual commitments under our long-term transportation agreements with hep , as all transactions with hep are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements . we have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract . for the contract year ended august 31 , 2017 , the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels , and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $ 26.0 million during this period . in september 2017 , the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in october 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration . we offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to august 31 , 2017 , which is permitted under the supply contract . we believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit . in march , 2006 , a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of montana refining company under an asset purchase agreement ( 201capa 201d ) . calumet montana refining llc , the current owner of the assets , has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $ 20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the apa for various costs incurred , as well as additional claims related to environmental matters . we have rejected most of the claims for payment , and this matter is scheduled for arbitration beginning in july 2018 . we have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the apa , and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material . note 20 : segment information effective fourth quarter of 2017 , we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business . accordingly , our tulsa refineries 2019 lubricants operations , previously reported in the refining segment , are now combined with the operations of our petro-canada lubricants business ( acquired february 1 , 2017 ) and reported in the lubricants and specialty products segment . our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation . our operations are organized into three reportable segments , refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep . our operations that are not included in the refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep segments are included in corporate and other . intersegment transactions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in eliminations . corporate and other and eliminations are aggregated and presented under corporate , other and eliminations column . the refining segment represents the operations of the el dorado , tulsa , navajo , cheyenne and woods cross refineries and hfc asphalt ( aggregated as a reportable segment ) . refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined products , such as gasoline , diesel fuel and jet fuel . these petroleum products are primarily marketed in the mid-continent , southwest and rocky mountain regions of the united states . hfc asphalt operates various asphalt terminals in arizona , new mexico and oklahoma. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements for the years of 2016 and 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "275.6" } ]
CONVFINQA307	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring fiscal 2013 , we entered into an asr with a financial institution to repurchase an aggregate of $ 125 million of our common stock . in exchange for an up-front payment of $ 125 million , the financial institution committed to deliver a number of shares during the asr 2019s purchase period , which ended on march 30 , 2013 . the total number of shares delivered under this asr was 2.5 million at an average price of $ 49.13 per share . during fiscal 2013 , in addition to shares repurchased under the asr , we repurchased and retired 1.1 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 50.3 million , or an average of $ 44.55 per share , including commissions . note 10 2014share-based awards and options non-qualified stock options and restricted stock have been granted to officers , key employees and directors under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan ( the 201c2005 plan 201d ) , the amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . there were no further grants made under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . there will be no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 7.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for stock options , restricted stock , performance units , tsr units , and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan ( each as described below ) . 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 21.1</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ 18.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ -6.9 ( 6.9 )</td><td>$ -7.1 ( 7.1 )</td><td>$ -5.6 ( 5.6 )</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock and restricted stock units we grant restricted stock and restricted stock units . restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 will either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted up to three types of performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . 80 2013 global payments inc . \| 2015 form 10-k annual report .\nQuestion: what is the share-based compensation expense in 2015?\nAnswer: 21.1\nQuestion: and in 2014?\nAnswer: 29.8\nQuestion: so what was the difference between these two years?\nAnswer: -8.7\nQuestion: and the value for 2014 again?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "29.8" } ]
CONVFINQA561	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td><td>10/30/2016</td><td>10/29/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>171.03</td><td>207.01</td><td>165.34</td><td>293.64</td><td>586.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.18</td><td>149.14</td><td>156.89</td><td>163.97</td><td>202.72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>131.94</td><td>167.25</td><td>160.80</td><td>193.36</td><td>288.96</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of an $100 investment in applied materials from 2012 to 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "65.34" } ]
CONVFINQA9765	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2005 and 2004. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2005</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 19.28</td><td>$ 17.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>21.16</td><td>16.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>25.20</td><td>20.70</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>28.33</td><td>22.73</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2004</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 13.12</td><td>$ 9.89</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>16.00</td><td>11.13</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>15.85</td><td>13.10</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>18.75</td><td>15.19</td></tr></table> on march 9 , 2006 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 29.83 per share as reported on the nyse . as of march 9 , 2006 , we had 419677495 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 687 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . in august 2005 , we amended and restated our charter to , among other things , eliminate our class b common stock and class c common stock . the information under 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 201d from the definitive proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference into item 12 of this annual report . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our credit facilities and the indentures governing the terms of our debt securities contain covenants that may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests . under our credit facilities , the borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the applicable credit facility only if no default exists or would be created thereby . the indenture governing the terms of the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes due 2011 ( ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes ) prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes also contain certain restrictive covenants , which prohibit the restricted subsidiaries under these indentures from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under our credit facilities and our notes indentures , see note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report and the section entitled 201cmanagement 2019s .\nQuestion: what was the high price of class a common stock in the quarter ended june 30, 2005?\nAnswer: 21.16\nQuestion: what was the low price?\nAnswer: 16.28\nQuestion: what is the net change in price?\nAnswer: 4.88\nQuestion: what was the low price?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "16.28" } ]
CONVFINQA5914	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement ( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes 201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period . the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8 million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively . the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was reflected in the \"other\" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 550</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>397</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>300</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>1017</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>497</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: as of january 2016, what was the amount equivalent to an annual interest rate of to the 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) note issued, in millions?\nAnswer: 13.0\nQuestion: and what was that amount for the 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) note issued?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1974	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbhge 2017 form 10-k \| 27 the short term . we do , however , view the long term economics of the lng industry as positive given our outlook for supply and demand . 2022 refinery , petrochemical and industrial projects : in refining , we believe large , complex refineries should gain advantage in a more competitive , oversupplied landscape in 2018 as the industry globalizes and refiners position to meet local demand and secure export potential . in petrochemicals , we continue to see healthy demand and cost-advantaged supply driving projects forward in 2018 . the industrial market continues to grow as outdated infrastructure is replaced , policy changes come into effect and power is decentralized . we continue to see growing demand across these markets in 2018 . we have other segments in our portfolio that are more correlated with different industrial metrics such as our digital solutions business . overall , we believe our portfolio is uniquely positioned to compete across the value chain , and deliver unique solutions for our customers . we remain optimistic about the long-term economics of the industry , but are continuing to operate with flexibility given our expectations for volatility and changing assumptions in the near term . in 2016 , solar and wind net additions exceeded coal and gas for the first time and it continued throughout 2017 . governments may change or may not continue incentives for renewable energy additions . in the long term , renewables' cost decline may accelerate to compete with new-built fossil capacity , however , we do not anticipate any significant impacts to our business in the foreseeable future . despite the near-term volatility , the long-term outlook for our industry remains strong . we believe the world 2019s demand for energy will continue to rise , and the supply of energy will continue to increase in complexity , requiring greater service intensity and more advanced technology from oilfield service companies . as such , we remain focused on delivering innovative cost-efficient solutions that deliver step changes in operating and economic performance for our customers . business environment the following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations , financial condition and liquidity position as of and for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes of the company . amounts reported in millions in graphs within this report are computed based on the amounts in hundreds . as a result , the sum of the components reported in millions may not equal the total amount reported in millions due to rounding . we operate in more than 120 countries helping customers find , evaluate , drill , produce , transport and process hydrocarbon resources . our revenue is predominately generated from the sale of products and services to major , national , and independent oil and natural gas companies worldwide , and is dependent on spending by our customers for oil and natural gas exploration , field development and production . this spending is driven by a number of factors , including our customers' forecasts of future energy demand and supply , their access to resources to develop and produce oil and natural gas , their ability to fund their capital programs , the impact of new government regulations and most importantly , their expectations for oil and natural gas prices as a key driver of their cash flows . oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 )</td><td>$ 54.12</td><td>$ 43.64</td><td>$ 52.32</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 )</td><td>50.80</td><td>43.29</td><td>48.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 )</td><td>2.99</td><td>2.52</td><td>2.62</td></tr></table> brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 ) $ 54.12 $ 43.64 $ 52.32 wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) 50.80 43.29 48.66 natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) 2.99 2.52 2.62 ( 1 ) energy information administration ( eia ) europe brent spot price per barrel .\nQuestion: what was the value of brent oil prices in 2017?\nAnswer: 54.12\nQuestion: what was the value in 2016?\nAnswer: 43.64\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\nAnswer: 10.48\nQuestion: what was the 2016 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "43.64" } ]
CONVFINQA2303	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncompared with $ 6.2 billion in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were significantly higher than in both 2014 and 2013 . excluding facility closure costs , impairment costs and other special items , operating profits in 2015 were 3% ( 3 % ) lower than in 2014 and 4% ( 4 % ) higher than in 2013 . benefits from lower input costs ( $ 18 million ) , lower costs associated with the closure of our courtland , alabama mill ( $ 44 million ) and favorable foreign exchange ( $ 33 million ) were offset by lower average sales price realizations and mix ( $ 52 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 16 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 18 million ) and higher planned maintenance downtime costs ( $ 26 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2014 include special items costs of $ 554 million associated with the closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . in the first quarter of 2014 , we completed our evaluation and concluded that there were no alternative uses for these assets . we recognized approximately $ 464 million of accelerated depreciation related to these assets in 2014 . operating profits in 2014 also include a charge of $ 32 million associated with a foreign tax amnesty program , and a gain of $ 20 million for the resolution of a legal contingency in india , while operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill and a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 5031</td><td>$ 5720</td><td>$ 6205</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit ( loss )</td><td>533</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>271</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 , $ 2.1 billion in 2014 and $ 2.6 billion in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were $ 179 million compared with a loss of $ 398 million ( a gain of $ 156 million excluding costs associated with the shutdown of our courtland , alabama mill ) in 2014 and a gain of $ 36 million ( $ 154 million excluding costs associated with the courtland mill shutdown ) in 2013 . sales volumes in 2015 decreased compared with 2014 primarily due to the closure of our courtland mill in 2014 . shipments to the domestic market increased , but export shipments declined . average sales price realizations decreased , primarily in the domestic market . input costs were lower , mainly for energy . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 12 million higher in 2015 . operating profits in 2014 were negatively impacted by costs associated with the shutdown of our courtland , alabama mill . entering the first quarter of 2016 , sales volumes are expected to be up slightly compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 . average sales margins should be about flat reflecting lower average sales price realizations offset by a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be stable . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 14 million lower with an outage scheduled in the 2016 first quarter at our georgetown mill compared with outages at our eastover and riverdale mills in the 2015 fourth quarter . in january 2015 , the united steelworkers , domtar corporation , packaging corporation of america , finch paper llc and p . h . glatfelter company ( the petitioners ) filed an anti-dumping petition before the united states international trade commission ( itc ) and the united states department of commerce ( doc ) alleging that paper producers in china , indonesia , australia , brazil , and portugal are selling uncoated free sheet paper in sheet form ( the products ) in violation of international trade rules . the petitioners also filed a countervailing-duties petition with these agencies regarding imports of the products from china and indonesia . in january 2016 , the doc announced its final countervailing duty rates on imports of the products to the united states from certain producers from china and indonesia . also , in january 2016 , the doc announced its final anti-dumping duty rates on imports of the products to the united states from certain producers from australia , brazil , china , indonesia and portugal . in february 2016 , the itc concluded its anti- dumping and countervailing duties investigations and made a final determination that the u.s . market had been injured by imports of the products . accordingly , the doc 2019s previously announced countervailing duty rates and anti-dumping duty rates will be in effect for a minimum of five years . we do not believe the impact of these rates will have a material , adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements . brazilian papers net sales for 2015 were $ 878 million compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 . operating profits for 2015 were $ 186 million compared with $ 177 million ( $ 209 million excluding costs associated with a tax amnesty program ) in 2014 and $ 210 million in 2013 . sales volumes in 2015 were lower compared with 2014 reflecting weak economic conditions and the absence of 2014 one-time events . average sales price realizations improved for domestic uncoated freesheet paper due to the realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2015 . margins were unfavorably affected by an increased proportion of sales to the lower-margin export markets . raw material costs increased for energy and wood . operating costs were higher than in 2014 , while planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 4 million lower. .\nQuestion: what were operating profits in 2015?\nAnswer: 186.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "177.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5944	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe increase in property operating expenses from our large market same store group is primarily the result of increases in real estate taxes of $ 3.2 million , personnel expenses of $ 1.9 million , water expenses of approximately $ 1.0 million , cable expenses of $ 0.5 million , and waste removal expenses of $ 0.2 million . the increase in property operating expenses from our secondary market same store group is primarily a result of increases in other operating expenses of $ 1.5 million , real estate taxes of $ 1.1 million , and personnel expenses of $ 1.2 million . the decrease in property operating expenses from our non-same store and other group is primarily the result of decreases in personnel expenses of $ 2.4 million and utility expenses of $ 1.7 million . depreciation and amortization the following table shows our depreciation and amortization expense by segment for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 ( dollars in thousands ) : year ended december 31 , 2015 year ended december 31 , 2014 increase percentage increase . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2015</td><td>year ended december 31 2014</td><td>increase</td><td>percentage increase</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>large market same store</td><td>$ 168872</td><td>$ 174957</td><td>$ -6085 ( 6085 )</td><td>( 3.5 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>secondary market same store</td><td>85008</td><td>86058</td><td>-1050 ( 1050 )</td><td>( 1.2 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>same store portfolio</td><td>253880</td><td>261015</td><td>-7135 ( 7135 )</td><td>( 2.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-same store and other</td><td>40640</td><td>40797</td><td>-157 ( 157 )</td><td>( 0.4 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 294520</td><td>$ 301812</td><td>$ -7292 ( 7292 )</td><td>( 2.4 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> the decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is primarily due to a decrease of $ 19.4 million related to the amortization of the fair value of in-place leases and resident relationships acquired as a result of the merger from the year ended december 31 , 2014 to the year ended december 31 , 2015 . this decrease was partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense of $ 11.7 million driven by an increase in gross real estate assets from the year ended december 31 , 2014 to the year ended december 31 , 2015 . property management expenses property management expenses for the year ended december 31 , 2015 were approximately $ 31.0 million , a decrease of $ 1.1 million from the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the majority of the decrease was related to a decrease in state franchise taxes of $ 2.1 million , partially offset by an increase in insurance expense of $ 0.6 million , an increase in payroll expense of $ 0.3 million , and an increase in incentive expense $ 0.3 million . general and administrative expenses general and administrative expenses for the year ended december 31 , 2015 were approximately $ 25.7 million , an increase of $ 4.8 million from the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the majority of the increase was related to increases in legal fees of $ 2.7 million and stock option expenses of $ 1.6 million . merger and integration related expenses there were no merger or integration related expenses for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , as these expenses related primarily to severance , legal , professional , temporary systems , staffing , and facilities costs incurred for the acquisition and integration of colonial . for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , merger and integration related expenses were approximately $ 3.2 million and $ 8.4 million , respectively . interest expense interest expense for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was approximately $ 122.3 million , a decrease of $ 1.6 million from the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in amortization of deferred financing cost from the year ended december 31 , 2014 to the year ended december 31 , 2015 of approximately $ 0.9 million . also , the overall debt balance decreased from $ 3.5 billion to $ 3.4 billion , a decrease of $ 85.1 million . the average effective interest rate remained at 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and the average years to rate maturity increased from 4.4 years to 4.8 years . job title mid-america apartment 10-k revision 1 serial <12345678> date sunday , march 20 , 2016 job number 304352-1 type page no . 50 operator abigaels .\nQuestion: in 2015, how much did the depreciation and amortization in the large market same store represent in relation to the one for the secondary market same store?\nAnswer: 1.98654\nQuestion: and between that year and the one before, what was the variation in the percentual decrease of those large market same-store and secondary market same-store?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.3" } ]
CONVFINQA2675	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years . stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives . the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria . annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached . a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td><td>2728290</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>192563</td><td>92729</td><td>185333</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-3267 ( 3267 )</td><td>-200284 ( 200284 )</td><td>-1167 ( 1167 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>2994197</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vested during the year</td><td>21074</td><td>408800</td><td>66299</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>compensation expense recorded</td><td>$ 6713155</td><td>$ 6930381</td><td>$ 17365401</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year</td><td>$ 17386949</td><td>$ 7023942</td><td>$ 21768084</td></tr></table> weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options . we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 . a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price . the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years . during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan . the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year . in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) . the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively . substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .\nQuestion: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?\nAnswer: 27.3\nQuestion: and for 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12.6" } ]
CONVFINQA10433	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nguaranteed by the company with guarantees from the joint venture partners for their proportionate amounts of any guaranty payment the company is obligated to make ( see guarantee table above ) . non-recourse mortgage debt is generally defined as debt whereby the lenders 2019 sole recourse with respect to borrower defaults is limited to the value of the property collateralized by the mortgage . the lender generally does not have recourse against any other assets owned by the borrower or any of the constituent members of the borrower , except for certain specified exceptions listed in the particular loan documents ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . these investments include the following joint ventures : venture ownership interest number of properties total gla thousands ) recourse mortgage payable ( in millions ) number of encumbered properties average interest weighted average ( months ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>venture</td><td>kimco ownership interest</td><td>number of properties</td><td>total gla ( in thousands )</td><td>non- recourse mortgage payable ( in millions )</td><td>number of encumbered properties</td><td>average interest rate</td><td>weighted average term ( months )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kimpru ( a )</td><td>15.0% ( 15.0 % )</td><td>60</td><td>10573</td><td>$ 920.4</td><td>39</td><td>5.53% ( 5.53 % )</td><td>23.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>riocan venture ( b )</td><td>50.0% ( 50.0 % )</td><td>45</td><td>9307</td><td>$ 642.6</td><td>28</td><td>4.29% ( 4.29 % )</td><td>39.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kir ( c )</td><td>48.6% ( 48.6 % )</td><td>54</td><td>11519</td><td>$ 866.4</td><td>46</td><td>5.04% ( 5.04 % )</td><td>61.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>big shopping centers ( d )</td><td>50.1% ( 50.1 % )</td><td>6</td><td>1029</td><td>$ 144.6</td><td>6</td><td>5.52% ( 5.52 % )</td><td>22.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>kimstone ( e ) ( g )</td><td>33.3% ( 33.3 % )</td><td>39</td><td>5595</td><td>$ 704.4</td><td>38</td><td>4.45% ( 4.45 % )</td><td>28.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cpp ( f )</td><td>55.0% ( 55.0 % )</td><td>7</td><td>2425</td><td>$ 112.1</td><td>2</td><td>5.05% ( 5.05 % )</td><td>10.1</td></tr></table> ( a ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with prudential real estate investors . ( b ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with riocan real estate investment trust . ( c ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with certain institutional investors . ( d ) represents the company 2019s remaining joint venture with big shopping centers ( tlv:big ) , an israeli public company ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . ( e ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with blackstone . ( f ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with the canadian pension plan investment board ( cppib ) . ( g ) on february 2 , 2015 , the company purchased the remaining 66.7% ( 66.7 % ) interest in the 39-property kimstone portfolio for a gross purchase price of $ 1.4 billion , including the assumption of $ 638.0 million in mortgage debt ( see footnote 26 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . the company has various other unconsolidated real estate joint ventures with varying structures . as of december 31 , 2014 , these other unconsolidated joint ventures had individual non-recourse mortgage loans aggregating $ 1.2 billion . the aggregate debt as of december 31 , 2014 , of all of the company 2019s unconsolidated real estate joint ventures is $ 4.6 billion , of which the company 2019s proportionate share of this debt is $ 1.8 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , these loans had scheduled maturities ranging from one month to 19 years and bear interest at rates ranging from 1.92% ( 1.92 % ) to 8.39% ( 8.39 % ) . approximately $ 525.7 million of the aggregate outstanding loan balance matures in 2015 , of which the company 2019s proportionate share is $ 206.0 million . these maturing loans are anticipated to be repaid with operating cash flows , debt refinancing and partner capital contributions , as deemed appropriate ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2014, what was the company 2019s proportionate share of debt from the aggregate debt of all unconsolidated real estate joint ventures?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.8" } ]
CONVFINQA485	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n18 . allowance for credit losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008 ( 1 )</td><td>2007 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowance for loan losses at beginning of year</td><td>$ 29616</td><td>$ 16117</td><td>$ 8940</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross credit losses</td><td>-32784 ( 32784 )</td><td>-20760 ( 20760 )</td><td>-11864 ( 11864 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross recoveries</td><td>2043</td><td>1749</td><td>1938</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net credit ( losses ) recoveries ( ncls )</td><td>$ -30741 ( 30741 )</td><td>$ -19011 ( 19011 )</td><td>$ -9926 ( 9926 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ncls</td><td>$ 30741</td><td>$ 19011</td><td>$ 9926</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net reserve builds ( releases )</td><td>5741</td><td>11297</td><td>6550</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net specific reserve builds ( releases )</td><td>2278</td><td>3366</td><td>356</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total provision for credit losses</td><td>$ 38760</td><td>$ 33674</td><td>$ 16832</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other net ( 2 )</td><td>-1602 ( 1602 )</td><td>-1164 ( 1164 )</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>allowance for loan losses at end of year</td><td>$ 36033</td><td>$ 29616</td><td>$ 16117</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at beginning of year ( 3 )</td><td>$ 887</td><td>$ 1250</td><td>$ 1100</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>provision for unfunded lending commitments</td><td>244</td><td>-363 ( 363 )</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at end of year ( 3 )</td><td>$ 1157</td><td>$ 887</td><td>$ 1250</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>total allowance for loans leases and unfunded lending commitments</td><td>$ 37190</td><td>$ 30503</td><td>$ 17367</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) reclassified to conform to the current period 2019s presentation . ( 2 ) 2009 primarily includes reductions to the loan loss reserve of approximately $ 543 million related to securitizations , approximately $ 402 million related to the sale or transfers to held-for-sale of u.s . real estate lending loans , and $ 562 million related to the transfer of the u.k . cards portfolio to held-for-sale . 2008 primarily includes reductions to the loan loss reserve of approximately $ 800 million related to fx translation , $ 102 million related to securitizations , $ 244 million for the sale of the german retail banking operation , $ 156 million for the sale of citicapital , partially offset by additions of $ 106 million related to the cuscatl e1n and bank of overseas chinese acquisitions . 2007 primarily includes reductions to the loan loss reserve of $ 475 million related to securitizations and transfers to loans held-for-sale , and reductions of $ 83 million related to the transfer of the u.k . citifinancial portfolio to held-for-sale , offset by additions of $ 610 million related to the acquisitions of egg , nikko cordial , grupo cuscatl e1n and grupo financiero uno . ( 3 ) represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded corporate lending commitments and letters of credit recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of allowance for loan losses from 2007 to 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7177.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5968	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .\nQuestion: what was the interest expense net in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "34.5" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.