Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA10561	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of current assets from 2006 to 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "74.2" } ]
CONVFINQA1647	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntax benefits recognized for stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , were $ 16 million , $ 6 million and $ 5 million , respectively . the amount of northrop grumman shares issued before the spin-off to satisfy stock-based compensation awards are recorded by northrop grumman and , accordingly , are not reflected in hii 2019s consolidated financial statements . the company realized tax benefits during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , of $ 2 million from the exercise of stock options and $ 10 million from the issuance of stock in settlement of rpsrs and rsrs . unrecognized compensation expense at december 31 , 2011 there was $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years . in addition , at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 19 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rsrs , which will be recognized over a period of 2.2 years ; $ 10 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the rpsrs converted as part of the spin-off , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of one year ; and $ 18 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rpsrs which will be recognized over a period of 2.0 years . stock options the compensation expense for the outstanding converted stock options was determined at the time of grant by northrop grumman . there were no additional options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . the fair value of the stock option awards is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options . the fair value of each of the stock option award was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions : dividend yield 2014the dividend yield was based on northrop grumman 2019s historical dividend yield level . volatility 2014expected volatility was based on the average of the implied volatility from traded options and the historical volatility of northrop grumman 2019s stock . risk-free interest rate 2014the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the stock option award was based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon u.s . treasury bond on the date the award was granted with a maturity equal to the expected term of the award . expected term 2014the expected term of awards granted was derived from historical experience and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . a stratification of expected terms based on employee populations ( executive and non-executive ) was considered in the analysis . the following significant weighted-average assumptions were used to value stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.6% ( 3.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility rate</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option life ( years )</td><td>6</td><td>5 & 6</td></tr></table> the weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was $ 11 and $ 7 , per share , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the dividend yield for 2010?\nAnswer: 2.9\nQuestion: and for 2009?\nAnswer: 3.6\nQuestion: so what was the difference between these two values?\nAnswer: -0.7\nQuestion: and the value for 2009 again?\nAnswer: 3.6\nQuestion: so what was the percentage decline during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.19444" } ]
CONVFINQA5730	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndevon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2013 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 4067</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019 and thereafter</td><td>6600</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 12042</td></tr></table> credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion syndicated , unsecured revolving line of credit ( the 201csenior credit facility 201d ) that matures on october 24 , 2018 . however , prior to the maturity date , devon has the option to extend the maturity for up to one additional one-year period , subject to the approval of the lenders . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2013 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65 percent . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2013 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 25.7 percent . commercial paper devon has access to $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor , or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2013 , devon 2019s weighted average borrowing rate on its commercial paper borrowings was 0.30 percent . other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately .\nQuestion: what is the total debt maturities for 2016 and 2017?\nAnswer: 1250.0\nQuestion: what is the total debt maturities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12042.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4320	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nexchanged installment notes totaling approximately $ 4.8 billion and approximately $ 400 million of inter- national paper promissory notes for interests in enti- ties formed to monetize the notes . international paper determined that it was not the primary benefi- ciary of these entities , and therefore should not consolidate its investments in these entities . during 2006 , these entities acquired an additional $ 4.8 bil- lion of international paper debt securities for cash , resulting in a total of approximately $ 5.2 billion of international paper debt obligations held by these entities at december 31 , 2006 . since international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset its obligations under these debt instruments with its investments in the entities , international paper has offset $ 5.0 billion of interest in the entities against $ 5.0 billion of international paper debt obligations held by the entities as of december 31 , 2007 . international paper also holds variable interests in two financing entities that were used to monetize long-term notes received from sales of forestlands in 2002 and 2001 . see note 8 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for a further discussion of these transactions . capital resources outlook for 2008 international paper expects to be able to meet pro- jected capital expenditures , service existing debt and meet working capital and dividend requirements during 2008 through current cash balances and cash from operations , supplemented as required by its various existing credit facilities . international paper has approximately $ 2.5 billion of committed bank credit agreements , which management believes is adequate to cover expected operating cash flow variability during our industry 2019s economic cycles . the agreements generally provide for interest rates at a floating rate index plus a pre-determined margin dependent upon international paper 2019s credit rating . the agreements include a $ 1.5 billion fully commit- ted revolving bank credit agreement that expires in march 2011 and has a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) payable quarterly . these agreements also include up to $ 1.0 billion of available commercial paper-based financ- ings under a receivables securitization program that expires in october 2009 with a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) . at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings under either the bank credit agreements or receiv- ables securitization program . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capi- tal structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2007 . principal financial covenants include maintenance of a minimum net worth , defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock , plus any goodwill impairment charges , of $ 9 billion ; and a maximum total debt to capital ratio , defined as total debt divided by total debt plus net worth , of 60% ( 60 % ) . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2007 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) and moody 2019s investor services ( moody 2019s ) , respectively . the company currently has short-term credit ratings by s&p and moody 2019s of a-2 and p-3 , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2007 , were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter maturities of long-term debt ( a ) $ 267 $ 1300 $ 1069 $ 396 $ 532 $ 3056 debt obligations with right of offset ( b ) 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 5000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>maturities of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 1300</td><td>$ 1069</td><td>$ 396</td><td>$ 532</td><td>$ 3056</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt obligations with right of offset ( b )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>5000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>136</td><td>116</td><td>101</td><td>84</td><td>67</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>1953</td><td>294</td><td>261</td><td>235</td><td>212</td><td>1480</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ( d )</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1710</td><td>$ 1431</td><td>$ 715</td><td>$ 811</td><td>$ 9628</td></tr></table> ( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its con- solidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2007 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.0 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.0 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 8 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements ) . ( c ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales . ( d ) not included in the above table are unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $ 280 million. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2007, what was the amount of the maturities of long-term debt from the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations for 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "267.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9825	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n492010 annual report consolidation 2013 effective february 28 , 2010 , the company adopted the fasb amended guidance for con- solidation . this guidance clarifies that the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions applies to the follow- ing : ( i ) a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity ; ( ii ) a subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture ; and ( iii ) an exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activ- ity for a noncontrolling interest in an entity ( including an equity method investee or joint venture ) . this guidance also expands the disclosures about the deconsolidation of a subsidiary or derecognition of a group of assets within the scope of the guidance . the adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . acquisitions : acquisition of bwe 2013 on december 17 , 2007 , the company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of beam wine estates , inc . ( 201cbwe 201d ) , an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of fortune brands , inc. , together with bwe 2019s subsidiaries : atlas peak vineyards , inc. , buena vista winery , inc. , clos du bois , inc. , gary farrell wines , inc . and peak wines international , inc . ( the 201cbwe acquisition 201d ) . as a result of the bwe acquisition , the company acquired the u.s . wine portfolio of fortune brands , inc. , including certain wineries , vineyards or inter- ests therein in the state of california , as well as various super-premium and fine california wine brands including clos du bois and wild horse . the bwe acquisition sup- ports the company 2019s strategy of strengthening its portfolio with fast-growing super-premium and above wines . the bwe acquisition strengthens the company 2019s position as the leading wine company in the world and the leading premium wine company in the u.s . total consideration paid in cash was $ 877.3 million . in addition , the company incurred direct acquisition costs of $ 1.4 million . the purchase price was financed with the net proceeds from the company 2019s december 2007 senior notes ( as defined in note 11 ) and revolver borrowings under the company 2019s june 2006 credit agreement , as amended in february 2007 and november 2007 ( as defined in note 11 ) . in accordance with the purchase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition . the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of the bwe business , including the factors described above . in june 2008 , the company sold certain businesses consisting of several of the california wineries and wine brands acquired in the bwe acquisition , as well as certain wineries and wine brands from the states of washington and idaho ( collectively , the 201cpacific northwest business 201d ) ( see note 7 ) . the results of operations of the bwe business are reported in the constellation wines segment and are included in the consolidated results of operations of the company from the date of acquisition . the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the bwe acquisition at the date of acquisition . ( in millions ) current assets $ 288.4 property , plant and equipment 232.8 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 288.4</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>232.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill</td><td>334.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>97.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other assets</td><td>30.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>983.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>103.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>long-term liabilities</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>105.2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 878.7</td></tr></table> other assets 30.2 total assets acquired 983.9 current liabilities 103.9 long-term liabilities 1.3 total liabilities assumed 105.2 net assets acquired $ 878.7 the trademarks are not subject to amortization . all of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . acquisition of svedka 2013 on march 19 , 2007 , the company acquired the svedka vodka brand ( 201csvedka 201d ) in connection with the acquisition of spirits marque one llc and related business ( the 201csvedka acquisition 201d ) . svedka is a premium swedish vodka . at the time of the acquisition , the svedka acquisition supported the company 2019s strategy of expanding the company 2019s premium spirits business and provided a foundation from which the company looked to leverage its existing and future premium spirits portfolio for growth . in addition , svedka complemented the company 2019s then existing portfolio of super-premium and value vodka brands by adding a premium vodka brand . total consideration paid in cash for the svedka acquisition was $ 385.8 million . in addition , the company incurred direct acquisition costs of $ 1.3 million . the pur- chase price was financed with revolver borrowings under the company 2019s june 2006 credit agreement , as amended in february 2007 . in accordance with the purchase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition . the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of the svedka business , including the factors described above . the results of operations of the svedka business are reported in the constellation wines segment and are included in the consolidated results of operations of the company from the date of acquisition. .\nQuestion: what is the balance of current assets?\nAnswer: 288.4\nQuestion: what about current liabilities?\nAnswer: 103.9\nQuestion: what current ratio does this represent?\nAnswer: 2.77575\nQuestion: what is the goodwill related to this purchase?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "334.6" } ]
CONVFINQA6371	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\na valuation allowance has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to the impairment of investments . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2011 and 2010 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : beginning balance gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions settlements with taxing authorities lapse of statute of limitations foreign exchange gains and losses ending balance $ 156925 11901 ( 4154 ) 32420 ( 29101 ) ( 3825 ) $ 163607 $ 218040 ( 7104 ) 15108 ( 70484 ) ( 7896 ) $ 156925 as of december 2 , 2011 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 12.3 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2008 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examination . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in august 2011 , a canadian income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2008 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was approximately $ 35 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we reclassified approximately $ 17 million to short-term income taxes payable and decreased deferred tax assets by approximately $ 18 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . the $ 17 million balance in short-term income taxes payable is partially secured by a letter of credit and is expected to be paid by the first quarter of fiscal 2012 . in october 2010 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2007 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 59 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we paid $ 20 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . a net income statement tax benefit in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 of $ 39 million resulted . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . the company believes that before the end of fiscal 2012 , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 40 million . these amounts would decrease income tax expense under current gaap related to income taxes . note 11 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions of approximately 700 full-time positions worldwide and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 78.6 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the position eliminated . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 156925</td><td>$ 218040</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>11901</td><td>9580</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>-4154 ( 4154 )</td><td>-7104 ( 7104 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>32420</td><td>15108</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-29101 ( 29101 )</td><td>-70484 ( 70484 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-3825 ( 3825 )</td><td>-7896 ( 7896 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-559 ( 559 )</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 163607</td><td>$ 156925</td></tr></table> a valuation allowance has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to the impairment of investments . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2011 and 2010 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : beginning balance gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions settlements with taxing authorities lapse of statute of limitations foreign exchange gains and losses ending balance $ 156925 11901 ( 4154 ) 32420 ( 29101 ) ( 3825 ) $ 163607 $ 218040 ( 7104 ) 15108 ( 70484 ) ( 7896 ) $ 156925 as of december 2 , 2011 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 12.3 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2008 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examination . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in august 2011 , a canadian income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2008 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was approximately $ 35 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we reclassified approximately $ 17 million to short-term income taxes payable and decreased deferred tax assets by approximately $ 18 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . the $ 17 million balance in short-term income taxes payable is partially secured by a letter of credit and is expected to be paid by the first quarter of fiscal 2012 . in october 2010 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2007 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 59 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we paid $ 20 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . a net income statement tax benefit in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 of $ 39 million resulted . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . the company believes that before the end of fiscal 2012 , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 40 million . these amounts would decrease income tax expense under current gaap related to income taxes . note 11 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions of approximately 700 full-time positions worldwide and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 78.6 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the position eliminated . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the minimum unrecognized tax benefits?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8299	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\noperating expenses operating expenses were $ 2.9 billion , an increase of 8% ( 8 % ) over 2000 . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , operating expenses grew 10% ( 10 % ) . expense growth in 2001 of 10% ( 10 % ) is significantly lower than the comparable 20% ( 20 % ) expense growth for 2000 compared to 1999 . state street successfully reduced the growth rate of expenses as revenue growth slowed during the latter half of 2000 and early 2001 . the expense growth in 2001 reflects higher expenses for salaries and employee benefits , as well as information systems and communications . o p e r a t i n g e x p e n s e s ( dollars in millions ) 2001 2000 1999 change adjusted change 00-01 ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td><td>1999</td><td>change 00-01</td><td>adjusted change 00-01 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>salaries and employee benefits</td><td>$ 1663</td><td>$ 1524</td><td>$ 1313</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>information systems and communications</td><td>365</td><td>305</td><td>287</td><td>20</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>transaction processing services</td><td>247</td><td>268</td><td>237</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>occupancy</td><td>229</td><td>201</td><td>188</td><td>15</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>363</td><td>346</td><td>311</td><td>5</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 2867</td><td>$ 2644</td><td>$ 2336</td><td>8</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>number of employees</td><td>19753</td><td>17604</td><td>17213</td><td>12</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet expenses related to salaries and employee benefits increased $ 139million in 2001 , or $ 163millionwhen adjusted for the formation of citistreet . the adjusted increase reflects more than 2100 additional staff to support the large client wins and new business from existing clients and acquisitions . this expense increase was partially offset by lower incentive-based compensation . information systems and communications expense was $ 365 million in 2001 , up 20% ( 20 % ) from the prior year . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , information systems and communications expense increased 22% ( 22 % ) . this growth reflects both continuing investment in software and hardware , aswell as the technology costs associated with increased staffing levels . expenses related to transaction processing services were $ 247 million , down $ 21 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) . these expenses are volume related and include external contract services , subcustodian fees , brokerage services and fees related to securities settlement . lower mutual fund shareholder activities , and lower subcustodian fees resulting from both the decline in asset values and lower transaction volumes , drove the decline . occupancy expensewas $ 229million , up 15% ( 15 % ) . the increase is due to expenses necessary to support state street 2019s global growth , and expenses incurred for leasehold improvements and other operational costs . other expenses were $ 363 million , up $ 17 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) . these expenses include professional services , advertising and sales promotion , and internal operational expenses . the increase over prior year is due to a $ 21 million increase in the amortization of goodwill , primarily from acquisitions in 2001 . in accordance with recent accounting pronouncements , goodwill amortization expense will be eliminated in 2002 . state street recorded approximately $ 38 million , or $ .08 per share after tax , of goodwill amortization expense in 2001 . state street 2019s cost containment efforts , which reduced discretionary spending , partially offset the increase in other expenses . state street corporation 9 .\nQuestion: what was the total of salaries and employee benefits in 2000?\nAnswer: 1524.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 1999?\nAnswer: 1313.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "211.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7264	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nequity in net earnings of affiliated companies equity income from the m-i swaco joint venture in 2010 represents eight months of equity income through the closing of the smith transaction . interest expense interest expense of $ 298 million in 2011 increased by $ 91 million compared to 2010 primarily due to the $ 4.6 billion of long-term debt that schlumberger issued during 2011 . interest expense of $ 207 million in 2010 decreased by $ 14 million compared to 2009 primarily due to a decline in the weighted average borrowing rates , from 3.9% ( 3.9 % ) to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) . research & engineering and general & administrative expenses , as a percentage of revenue , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research & engineering</td><td>2.7% ( 2.7 % )</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>general & administrative</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr></table> although research & engineering decreased as a percentage of revenue in 2011 as compared to 2010 and in 2010 compared to 2009 , it has increased in absolute dollars by $ 154 million and $ 117 million , respectively . these increases in absolute dollars were driven in large part by the impact of the smith acquisition . income taxes the schlumberger effective tax rate was 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) in 2011 , 17.3% ( 17.3 % ) in 2010 , and 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) in 2009 . the schlumberger effective tax rate is sensitive to the geographic mix of earnings . when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america increases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally decrease . conversely , when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america decreases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally increase . the effective tax rate for both 2011 and 2010 was impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements . excluding the impact of these charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2011 was 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) compared to 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) in 2010 . this increase in the effective tax rate , excluding the impact of the charges and credits , was primarily attributable to the fact that schlumberger generated a larger proportion of its pretax earnings in north america in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a result of improved market conditions and the effect of a full year 2019s activity from the acquired smith businesses . the effective tax rate for 2009 was also impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements , but to a much lesser extent . excluding charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2010 was 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) compared to 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) in 2009 . this increase is largely attributable to the geographic mix of earnings as well as the inclusion of four months 2019 results from the acquisition of smith , which served to increase the schlumberger effective tax charges and credits schlumberger recorded significant charges and credits in continuing operations during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . these charges and credits , which are summarized below , are more fully described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the schlumberger interest expense from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: 207.0\nQuestion: and what is this change as a portion of that interest expense in 2010?\nAnswer: 0.43961\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the change in the research & engineering as a percent of revenue?\nAnswer: -0.6\nQuestion: what was that percent in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.3" } ]
CONVFINQA9695	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 20 of 100 segment sales were $ 100.7 million lower in 2009 than in 2008 , primarily as a result of the impact of lower aluminum prices partially offset by an increase in sales volumes . the higher sales volumes in 2009 were the result of incremental volumes from the four plants purchased from ab inbev , partially offset by certain plant closures and lower sales volumes in the existing business . segment earnings in 2010 were $ 122.3 million higher than in 2009 primarily due to a net $ 85 million impact related to the higher sales volumes and $ 45 million of product mix and improved manufacturing performance associated with higher production . also adding to the 2010 improvement was the effect of a $ 7 million out-of-period inventory charge in 2009 . the details of the out-of-period adjustment are included in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included within item 8 of this report . segment earnings in 2009 were higher than in 2008 due to $ 12 million of earnings contribution from the four acquired plants and approximately $ 21 million of savings associated with plant closures . partially offsetting these favorable impacts were lower carbonated soft drink and beer can sales volumes ( excluding the newly acquired plants ) and approximately $ 25 million related to higher cost inventories in the first half of 2009 . metal beverage packaging , europe . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1697.6</td><td>$ 1739.5</td><td>$ 1868.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment earnings</td><td>$ 212.9</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation costs ( a )</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total segment earnings</td><td>$ 209.7</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) further details of these items are included in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . the metal beverage packaging , europe , segment includes metal beverage packaging products manufactured in europe . ball packaging europe has manufacturing plants located in germany , the united kingdom , france , the netherlands , poland and serbia , and is the second largest metal beverage container business in europe . segment sales in 2010 decreased $ 41.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange effects of $ 93 million and price and mix changes , partially offset by higher sales volumes . segment sales in 2009 as compared to 2008 were $ 129.2 million lower due to $ 110 million of unfavorable foreign exchange effects , partially offset by better commercial terms . sales volumes in 2009 were essentially flat compared to those in the prior year . segment earnings in 2010 decreased $ 1.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily the result of a $ 28 million increase related to higher sales volumes , offset by $ 18 million of negative effects from foreign currency translation and $ 12 million of higher inventory and other costs . while 2009 sales volumes were consistent with the prior year , the adverse effects of foreign currency translation , both within europe and on the conversion of the euro to the u.s . dollar , reduced segment earnings by $ 8 million . also contributing to lower segment earnings were higher cost inventory carried into 2009 and a change in sales mix , partially offset by better commercial terms in some of our contracts . on january 18 , 2011 , ball acquired aerocan s.a.s . ( aerocan ) , a leading european supplier of aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , for 20ac222.4 million ( approximately $ 300 million ) in cash and assumed debt . aerocan manufactures extruded aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , and the aluminum slugs used to make them , for customers in the personal care , pharmaceutical , beverage and food industries . it operates three aerosol can manufacturing plants 2013 one each in the czech republic , france and the united kingdom 2013 and is a 51 percent owner of a joint venture aluminum slug plant in france . the four plants employ approximately 560 people . the acquisition of aerocan will allow ball to enter a growing part of the metal packaging industry and to broaden the company 2019s market development efforts into a new customer base. .\nQuestion: what was the increase in the segment earnings in 2010, in millions?\nAnswer: 122.3\nQuestion: and what amount from this increase was due to higher sales volumes?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "85.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7350	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndiscussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014 factors affecting sources of liquidity . 201d recent sales of unregistered securities during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we issued an aggregate of 4670335 shares of our class a common stock upon conversion of $ 57.1 million principal amount of our 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes . pursuant to the terms of the indenture , the holders of the 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes received 81.808 shares of class a common stock for every $ 1000 principal amount of notes converted . the shares were issued to the noteholders in reliance on the exemption from registration set forth in section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . no underwriters were engaged in connection with such issuances . in connection with the conversion , we paid such holders an aggregate of $ 4.9 million , calculated based on the accrued and unpaid interest on the notes and the discounted value of the future interest payments on the notes . subsequent to december 31 , 2005 , we issued shares of class a common stock upon conversions of additional 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes , as set forth in item 9b of this annual report under the caption 201cother information . 201d during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we issued an aggregate of 398412 shares of our class a common stock upon exercises of 55729 warrants assumed in our merger with spectrasite , inc . in august 2005 , in connection with our merger with spectrasite , inc. , we assumed approximately 1.0 million warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase 7.15 shares of class a common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . net proceeds from these warrant exercises were approximately $ 1.8 million . the shares of class a common stock issued to the warrantholders upon exercise of the warrants were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration set forth in section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . no underwriters were engaged in connection with such issuances . subsequent to december 31 , 2005 , we issued shares of class a common stock upon exercises of additional warrants , as set forth in item 9b of this annual report under the caption 201cother information . 201d issuer purchases of equity securities in november 2005 , we announced that our board of directors had approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we intend to repurchase up to $ 750.0 million of our class a common stock through december 2006 . during the fourth quarter of 2005 , we repurchased 2836519 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 76.6 million pursuant to our stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 1 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 )</td><td>approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>11/17/05 2013 11/30/05</td><td>874306</td><td>$ 26.25</td><td>874306</td><td>$ 727.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>12/1/05 2013 12/31/05</td><td>1962213</td><td>$ 27.29</td><td>1962213</td><td>$ 673.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total fourth quarter</td><td>2836519</td><td>$ 26.97</td><td>2836519</td><td>$ 673.4</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) all issuer repurchases were made pursuant to the stock repurchase program publicly announced in november 2005 . pursuant to the program , we intend to repurchase up to $ 750.0 million of our class a common stock during the period november 2005 through december 2006 . under the program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we entered into a trading plan under rule 10b5-1 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self- imposed trading blackout periods . the program may be discontinued at any time . since december 31 , 2005 , we have continued to repurchase shares of our class a common stock pursuant to our stock repurchase program . between january 1 , 2006 and march 9 , 2006 , we repurchased 3.9 million shares of class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 117.4 million pursuant to the stock repurchase program. .\nQuestion: what was the total number of shares purchased in december 2005?\nAnswer: 1962213.0\nQuestion: and what was the average price paid for each of those shares?\nAnswer: 27.29\nQuestion: what was, then, the total value spent in the purchase of those shares?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "53548792.77" } ]
CONVFINQA5270	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbusiness-related metrics as of or for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loan and lease receivables</td><td>$ 43.2</td><td>$ 37.4</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average loan and lease receivables</td><td>41.7</td><td>31.7</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automobile origination volume</td><td>27.8</td><td>25.3</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>automobile market share</td><td>6.1% ( 6.1 % )</td><td>5.7% ( 5.7 % )</td><td>40bp</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>30+ day delinquency rate</td><td>1.46</td><td>1.54</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net charge-off ratio</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.51</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>overhead ratio</td><td>35</td><td>36</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td></tr></table> crb is the no . 1 bank in the new york tri-state area and a top five bank in texas ( both ranked by retail deposits ) , providing payment , liquidity , investment , insurance and credit products and services to three primary customer segments : small busi- ness , affluent and retail . within these segments , crb serves 326000 small businesses , 433000 affluent consumers and 2.6 million mass-market consumers . crb 2019s continued focus on expanding customer relationships resulted in a 14% ( 14 % ) increase in core deposits ( for this purpose , core deposits are total deposits less time deposits ) from december 31 , 2002 , and a 77% ( 77 % ) increase in the cross-sell of chase credit products over 2002 . in 2003 , mortgage and home equity originations through crb 2019s distribution channels were $ 3.4 billion and $ 4.7 billion , respectively . branch-originated credit cards totaled 77000 , contributing to 23% ( 23 % ) of crb customers holding chase credit cards . crb is compensated by cfs 2019s credit businesses for the home finance and credit card loans it origi- nates and does not retain these balances . chase regional banking while crb continues to position itself for growth , decreased deposit spreads related to the low-rate environment and increased credit costs resulted in an 80% ( 80 % ) decline in crb operating earnings from 2002 . this decrease was partly offset by an 8% ( 8 % ) increase in total average deposits . operating revenue of $ 2.6 billion decreased by 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2002 . net interest income declined by 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 1.7 billion , primarily attributable to the lower interest rate environment . noninterest revenue decreased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 927 million due to lower deposit service fees , decreased debit card fees and one-time gains in 2002 . crb 2019s revenue does not include funding profits earned on its deposit base ; these amounts are included in the results of global treasury . operating expense of $ 2.4 billion increased by 7% ( 7 % ) from 2002 . the increase was primarily due to investments in technology within the branch network ; also contributing were higher compensation expenses related to increased staff levels and higher severance costs as a result of continued restructuring . this increase in operating caf is the largest u.s . bank originator of automobile loans and leases , with more than 2.9 million accounts . in 2003 , caf had a record number of automobile loan and lease originations , growing by 10% ( 10 % ) over 2002 to $ 27.8 billion . loan and lease receivables of $ 43.2 billion at december 31 , 2003 , were 16% ( 16 % ) higher than at the prior year-end . despite a challenging operating environment reflecting slightly declining new car sales in 2003 and increased competition , caf 2019s market share among automobile finance companies improved to 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) in 2003 from 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2002 . the increase in market share was the result of strong organic growth and an origination strategy that allies the business with manufac- turers and dealers . caf 2019s relationships with several major car manufacturers contributed to 2003 growth , as did caf 2019s dealer relationships , which increased from approximately 12700 dealers in 2002 to approximately 13700 dealers in 2003 . in 2003 , operating earnings were $ 205 million , 23% ( 23 % ) higher compared with 2002 . the increase in earnings was driven by continued revenue growth and improved operating efficiency . in 2003 , caf 2019s operating revenue grew by 23% ( 23 % ) to $ 842 million . net interest income grew by 33% ( 33 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase was driven by strong operating performance due to higher average loans and leases outstanding , reflecting continued strong origination volume and lower funding costs . operating expense of $ 292 million increased by 18% ( 18 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase in expenses was driven by higher average chase auto finance loans outstanding , higher origination volume and higher perform- ance-based incentives . caf 2019s overhead ratio improved from 36% ( 36 % ) in 2002 to 35% ( 35 % ) in 2003 , as a result of strong revenue growth , con- tinued productivity gains and disciplined expense management . credit costs increased 18% ( 18 % ) to $ 205 million , primarily reflecting a 32% ( 32 % ) increase in average loan and lease receivables . credit quality continued to be strong relative to 2002 , as evidenced by a lower net charge-off ratio and 30+ day delinquency rate . caf also comprises chase education finance , a top provider of government-guaranteed and private loans for higher education . loans are provided through a joint venture with sallie mae , a government-sponsored enterprise and the leader in funding and servicing education loans . chase education finance 2019s origination volume totaled $ 2.7 billion , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) from last year . management 2019s discussion and analysis j.p . morgan chase & co . 42 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report .\nQuestion: what was the change in 30+ day delinquency rate, as a percentage?\nAnswer: 0.08\nQuestion: when applied to the 2002 values, by how much did this rate improve in 2003?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.1232" } ]
CONVFINQA4703	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .\nQuestion: what is the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012, in millions?\nAnswer: 11600.0\nQuestion: what about the total sales?\nAnswer: 13280.0\nQuestion: what portion does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.87349\nQuestion: what about the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2011, in millions?\nAnswer: 8600.0\nQuestion: what portion is this from the total sales in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.82454" } ]
CONVFINQA1969	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) company 2019s financial statements and establishes guidelines for recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return . as a result of this adoption , we recorded a $ 1.5 million increase in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits , which was accounted for as a $ 1.0 million reduction to the june 1 , 2007 balance of retained earnings and a $ 0.5 million reduction to the june 1 , 2007 balance of additional paid-in capital . as of the adoption date , other long-term liabilities included liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits of $ 3.8 million and accrued interest and penalties of $ 0.7 million . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at june 1 2007</td><td>$ 3760</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>93</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-190 ( 190 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at may 31 2008</td><td>$ 3713</td></tr></table> as of may 31 , 2008 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate is $ 3.7 million . we recognize accrued interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in interest expense and accrued penalty expense related to unrecognized tax benefits in sales , general and administrative expenses . during fiscal 2008 , we recorded $ 0.3 million of accrued interest and penalty expense related to the unrecognized income tax benefits . we anticipate the total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits will decrease by $ 1.1 million net of interest and penalties from our foreign operations within the next 12 months as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations . we conduct business globally and file income tax returns in the united states federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions . in the normal course of business , we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world , including such major jurisdictions as the united states and canada . with few exceptions , we are no longer subject to income tax examinations for years ended may 31 , 2003 and prior . we are currently under audit by the internal revenue service of the united states for the 2004 to 2005 tax years . we expect that the examination phase of the audit for the years 2004 to 2005 will conclude in fiscal 2009 . note 8 2014shareholders 2019 equity on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors . under this authorization , we repurchased 2.3 million shares of our common stock during fiscal 2008 at a cost of $ 87.0 million , or an average of $ 37.85 per share , including commissions . as of may 31 , 2008 , we had $ 13.0 million remaining under our current share repurchase authorization . no amounts were repurchased during fiscal 2007 . note 9 2014share-based awards and options as of may 31 , 2008 , we had four share-based employee compensation plans . for all share-based awards granted after june 1 , 2006 , compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis . the fair value of share- based awards granted prior to june 1 , 2006 is amortized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis from the date of the grant . there was no share-based compensation capitalized during fiscal 2008 , 2007 , and 2006. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: -47.0\nQuestion: and as of may of that last year, what was the amount remaining under the current share repurchase authorization?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "13000000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9414	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntax benefits recognized for stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , were $ 16 million , $ 6 million and $ 5 million , respectively . the amount of northrop grumman shares issued before the spin-off to satisfy stock-based compensation awards are recorded by northrop grumman and , accordingly , are not reflected in hii 2019s consolidated financial statements . the company realized tax benefits during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , of $ 2 million from the exercise of stock options and $ 10 million from the issuance of stock in settlement of rpsrs and rsrs . unrecognized compensation expense at december 31 , 2011 there was $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years . in addition , at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 19 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rsrs , which will be recognized over a period of 2.2 years ; $ 10 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the rpsrs converted as part of the spin-off , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of one year ; and $ 18 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rpsrs which will be recognized over a period of 2.0 years . stock options the compensation expense for the outstanding converted stock options was determined at the time of grant by northrop grumman . there were no additional options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . the fair value of the stock option awards is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options . the fair value of each of the stock option award was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions : dividend yield 2014the dividend yield was based on northrop grumman 2019s historical dividend yield level . volatility 2014expected volatility was based on the average of the implied volatility from traded options and the historical volatility of northrop grumman 2019s stock . risk-free interest rate 2014the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the stock option award was based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon u.s . treasury bond on the date the award was granted with a maturity equal to the expected term of the award . expected term 2014the expected term of awards granted was derived from historical experience and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . a stratification of expected terms based on employee populations ( executive and non-executive ) was considered in the analysis . the following significant weighted-average assumptions were used to value stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.6% ( 3.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility rate</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option life ( years )</td><td>6</td><td>5 & 6</td></tr></table> the weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was $ 11 and $ 7 , per share , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5137	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npre-construction costs , interim dam safety measures and environmental costs and construction costs . the authorized costs were being recovered via a surcharge over a twenty-year period which began in october 2012 . the unrecovered balance of project costs incurred , including cost of capital , net of surcharges totaled $ 85 million and $ 89 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . surcharges collected were $ 8 million and $ 7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . pursuant to the general rate case approved in december 2018 , approval was granted to reset the twenty-year amortization period to begin january 1 , 2018 and to establish an annual revenue requirement of $ 8 million to be recovered through base rates . debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues . call premiums on the redemption of long- term debt , as well as unamortized debt expense , are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates . purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the company 2019s utility subsidiary in california during 2002 , and acquisitions in 2007 by the company 2019s utility subsidiary in new jersey . as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization on the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 . tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense on the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from five to fifteen years , as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service . as a result of the prepayment by american water capital corp. , the company 2019s wholly owned finance subsidiary ( 201cawcc 201d ) , of the 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series c senior notes due upon maturity on december 21 , 2018 ( the 201cseries c notes 201d ) , 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series e senior notes due march 29 , 2019 ( the 201cseries e notes 201d ) and 5.77% ( 5.77 % ) series f senior notes due december 21 , 2022 ( the 201cseries f notes , 201d and together with the series e notes , the 201cseries notes 201d ) , a make-whole premium of $ 10 million was paid to the holders of the series notes on september 11 , 2018 . substantially all of these early debt extinguishment costs were allocable to the company 2019s utility subsidiaries and recorded as regulatory assets , as the company believes they are probable of recovery in future rates . other regulatory assets include certain construction costs for treatment facilities , property tax stabilization , employee-related costs , deferred other postretirement benefit expense , business services project expenses , coastal water project costs , rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others . these costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods . regulatory liabilities regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are probable of being credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process . also , if costs expected to be incurred in the future are currently being recovered through rates , the company records those expected future costs as regulatory liabilities . the following table provides the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income taxes recovered through rates</td><td>$ 1279</td><td>$ 1242</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>removal costs recovered through rates</td><td>309</td><td>315</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>postretirement benefit liability</td><td>209</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts</td><td>46</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tcja reserve on revenue</td><td>36</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>28</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total regulatory liabilities</td><td>$ 1907</td><td>$ 1664</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in total regulatory liabilities from 2017 to 2018?\nAnswer: 243.0\nQuestion: and what were those total regulatory liabilities in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1664.0" } ]
CONVFINQA968	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 4 2014acquisitions ( continued ) acquisition of emagic gmbh during the fourth quarter of 2002 , the company acquired emagic gmbh ( emagic ) , a provider of professional software solutions for computer based music production , for approximately $ 30 million in cash ; $ 26 million of which was paid immediately upon closing of the deal and $ 4 million of which was held-back for future payment contingent on continued employment by certain employees that would be allocated to future compensation expense in the appropriate periods over the following 3 years . during fiscal 2003 , contingent consideration totaling $ 1.3 million was paid . the acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase . the portion of the purchase price allocated to purchased in-process research and development ( ipr&d ) was expensed immediately , and the portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired technology and to tradename will be amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 years . goodwill associated with the acquisition of emagic is not subject to amortization pursuant to the provisions of sfas no . 142 . total consideration was allocated as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>net tangible assets acquired</td><td>$ 2.3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tradename</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>in-process research and development</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>goodwill</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total consideration</td><td>$ 26.0</td></tr></table> the amount of the purchase price allocated to ipr&d was expensed upon acquisition , because the technological feasibility of products under development had not been established and no alternative future uses existed . the ipr&d relates primarily to emagic 2019s logic series technology and extensions . at the date of the acquisition , the products under development were between 43%-83% ( 43%-83 % ) complete , and it was expected that the remaining work would be completed during the company 2019s fiscal 2003 at a cost of approximately $ 415000 . the remaining efforts , which were completed in 2003 , included finalizing user interface design and development , and testing . the fair value of the ipr&d was determined using an income approach , which reflects the projected free cash flows that will be generated by the ipr&d projects and that are attributable to the acquired technology , and discounting the projected net cash flows back to their present value using a discount rate of 25% ( 25 % ) . acquisition of certain assets of zayante , inc. , prismo graphics , and silicon grail during fiscal 2002 the company acquired certain technology and patent rights of zayante , inc. , prismo graphics , and silicon grail corporation for a total of $ 20 million in cash . these transactions have been accounted for as asset acquisitions . the purchase price for these asset acquisitions , except for $ 1 million identified as contingent consideration which would be allocated to compensation expense over the following 3 years , has been allocated to acquired technology and would be amortized on a straight-line basis over 3 years , except for certain assets acquired from zayante associated with patent royalty streams that would be amortized over 10 years . acquisition of nothing real , llc during the second quarter of 2002 , the company acquired certain assets of nothing real , llc ( nothing real ) , a privately-held company that develops and markets high performance tools designed for the digital image creation market . of the $ 15 million purchase price , the company has allocated $ 7 million to acquired technology , which will be amortized over its estimated life of 5 years . the remaining $ 8 million , which has been identified as contingent consideration , rather than recorded as an additional component of .\nQuestion: what percentage did goodwill represent in relation to the total purchase price?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.71538" } ]
CONVFINQA1152	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis we believe our credit ratings are primarily based on the credit rating agencies 2019 assessment of : 2030 our liquidity , market , credit and operational risk management practices ; 2030 the level and variability of our earnings ; 2030 our capital base ; 2030 our franchise , reputation and management ; 2030 our corporate governance ; and 2030 the external operating environment , including , in some cases , the assumed level of government or other systemic support . certain of our derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings . we assess the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of us at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . we allocate a portion of our gcla to ensure we would be able to make the additional collateral or termination payments that may be required in the event of a two-notch reduction in our long-term credit ratings , as well as collateral that has not been called by counterparties , but is available to them . the table below presents the additional collateral or termination payments related to our net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in our credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>$ 1072</td><td>$ 911</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2815</td><td>2989</td></tr></table> $ in millions 2014 2013 additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade $ 1072 $ 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 cash flows as a global financial institution , our cash flows are complex and bear little relation to our net earnings and net assets . consequently , we believe that traditional cash flow analysis is less meaningful in evaluating our liquidity position than the liquidity and asset-liability management policies described above . cash flow analysis may , however , be helpful in highlighting certain macro trends and strategic initiatives in our businesses . year ended december 2014 . our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $ 3.53 billion to $ 57.60 billion at the end of 2014 . we used $ 22.53 billion in net cash for operating and investing activities , which reflects an initiative to reduce our balance sheet , and the funding of loans receivable . we generated $ 19.00 billion in net cash from financing activities from an increase in bank deposits and net proceeds from issuances of unsecured long-term borrowings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock . year ended december 2013 . our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $ 11.54 billion to $ 61.13 billion at the end of 2013 . we generated $ 4.54 billion in net cash from operating activities . we used net cash of $ 16.08 billion for investing and financing activities , primarily to fund loans receivable and repurchases of common stock . year ended december 2012 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 16.66 billion to $ 72.67 billion at the end of 2012 . we generated $ 9.14 billion in net cash from operating and investing activities . we generated $ 7.52 billion in net cash from financing activities from an increase in bank deposits , partially offset by net repayments of unsecured and secured long-term borrowings . 78 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .\nQuestion: what was the change in the required additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade in millions in 2014?\nAnswer: 1743.0\nQuestion: and in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2078.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1383	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nto determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2011</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>465</td><td>60.70</td><td>1534</td><td>60.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>64.21</td><td>-831 ( 831 )</td><td>45.47</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>60.27</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>60.51</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>1119</td><td>$ 61.14</td><td>3061</td><td>$ 60.04</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 .\nQuestion: what was the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012?\nAnswer: 60.68\nQuestion: and what was it for 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "63.25" } ]
CONVFINQA7213	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunited parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above . these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 . the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively . these notes are not callable . the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2291</td><td>2291</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>285</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-990 ( 990 )</td><td>-896 ( 896 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1656</td><td>$ 1653</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the number of vehicles under capital lease in 2017?\nAnswer: 70.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\nAnswer: 68.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in that number over the year?\nAnswer: 2.0\nQuestion: what was the number of vehicles under capital lease in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "68.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1320	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .\nQuestion: what was the net reserves as of 12/31/12?\nAnswer: 425.7\nQuestion: and for the period ended 12/31/11?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "480.2" } ]
CONVFINQA7210	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunited parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above . these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 . the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively . these notes are not callable . the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2291</td><td>2291</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>285</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-990 ( 990 )</td><td>-896 ( 896 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1656</td><td>$ 1653</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the number of vehicles under capital lease in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "70.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5477	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy entergy new orleans provides electric and gas service in the city of new orleans pursuant to indeterminate permits set forth in city ordinances ( except electric service in algiers , which is provided by entergy louisiana ) . these ordinances contain a continuing option for the city of new orleans to purchase entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas utility properties . entergy texas holds a certificate of convenience and necessity from the puct to provide electric service to areas within approximately 27 counties in eastern texas , and holds non-exclusive franchises to provide electric service in approximately 68 incorporated municipalities . entergy texas was typically granted 50-year franchises , but recently has been receiving 25-year franchises . entergy texas 2019s electric franchises expire during 2013-2058 . the business of system energy is limited to wholesale power sales . it has no distribution franchises . property and other generation resources generating stations the total capability of the generating stations owned and leased by the utility operating companies and system energy as of december 31 , 2011 , is indicated below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) total</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) gas/oil</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) nuclear</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) coal</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) hydro</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>4774</td><td>1668</td><td>1823</td><td>1209</td><td>74</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy gulf states louisiana</td><td>3317</td><td>1980</td><td>974</td><td>363</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>5424</td><td>4265</td><td>1159</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>3229</td><td>2809</td><td>-</td><td>420</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>764</td><td>764</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>2538</td><td>2269</td><td>-</td><td>269</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>system energy</td><td>1071</td><td>-</td><td>1071</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>21117</td><td>13755</td><td>5027</td><td>2261</td><td>74</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 201cowned and leased capability 201d is the dependable load carrying capability as demonstrated under actual operating conditions based on the primary fuel ( assuming no curtailments ) that each station was designed to utilize . the entergy system's load and capacity projections are reviewed periodically to assess the need and timing for additional generating capacity and interconnections . these reviews consider existing and projected demand , the availability and price of power , the location of new load , and the economy . summer peak load in the entergy system service territory has averaged 21246 mw from 2002-2011 . in the 2002 time period , the entergy system's long-term capacity resources , allowing for an adequate reserve margin , were approximately 3000 mw less than the total capacity required for peak period demands . in this time period the entergy system met its capacity shortages almost entirely through short-term power purchases in the wholesale spot market . in the fall of 2002 , the entergy system began a program to add new resources to its existing generation portfolio and began a process of issuing requests for proposals ( rfp ) to procure supply-side resources from sources other than the spot market to meet the unique regional needs of the utility operating companies . the entergy system has adopted a long-term resource strategy that calls for the bulk of capacity needs to be met through long-term resources , whether owned or contracted . entergy refers to this strategy as the \"portfolio transformation strategy\" . over the past nine years , portfolio transformation has resulted in the addition of about 4500 mw of new long-term resources . these figures do not include transactions currently pending as a result of the summer 2009 rfp . when the summer 2009 rfp transactions are included in the entergy system portfolio of long-term resources and adjusting for unit deactivations of older generation , the entergy system is approximately 500 mw short of its projected 2012 peak load plus reserve margin . this remaining need is expected to be met through a nuclear uprate at grand gulf and limited-term resources . the entergy system will continue to access the spot power market to economically .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2011 what was the amount from total capabilities that was generated from coal stations for entergy arkansas?\nAnswer: 1209.0\nQuestion: and what were those total capabilities?\nAnswer: 4774.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, did that amount represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.25325" } ]
CONVFINQA9986	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nanalog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 31 , 2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014</td><td>3188</td><td>$ 43.46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>818</td><td>$ 52.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-1151 ( 1151 )</td><td>$ 39.72</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-157 ( 157 )</td><td>$ 45.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015</td><td>2698</td><td>$ 47.59</td></tr></table> as of october 31 , 2015 , there was $ 108.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.3 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was approximately $ 65.6 million , $ 57.4 million and $ 63.9 million , respectively . common stock repurchase program the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors have authorized the company to repurchase $ 5.6 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . under the program , the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 31 , 2015 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 140.7 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.0 billion under this program . an additional $ 544.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance . 4 . industry , segment and geographic information the company operates and tracks its results in one reportable segment based on the aggregation of six operating segments . the company designs , develops , manufactures and markets a broad range of integrated circuits ( ics ) . the chief executive officer has been identified as the company's chief operating decision maker . the company has determined that all of the company's operating segments share the following similar economic characteristics , and therefore meet the criteria established for operating segments to be aggregated into one reportable segment , namely : 2022 the primary source of revenue for each operating segment is the sale of integrated circuits . 2022 the integrated circuits sold by each of the company's operating segments are manufactured using similar semiconductor manufacturing processes and raw materials in either the company 2019s own production facilities or by third-party wafer fabricators using proprietary processes . 2022 the company sells its products to tens of thousands of customers worldwide . many of these customers use products spanning all operating segments in a wide range of applications . 2022 the integrated circuits marketed by each of the company's operating segments are sold globally through a direct sales force , third-party distributors , independent sales representatives and via our website to the same types of customers . all of the company's operating segments share a similar long-term financial model as they have similar economic characteristics . the causes for variation in operating and financial performance are the same among the company's operating segments and include factors such as ( i ) life cycle and price and cost fluctuations , ( ii ) number of competitors , ( iii ) product .\nQuestion: what was the number of restricted stock units outstanding on november 1, 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3188.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4323	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nexchanged installment notes totaling approximately $ 4.8 billion and approximately $ 400 million of inter- national paper promissory notes for interests in enti- ties formed to monetize the notes . international paper determined that it was not the primary benefi- ciary of these entities , and therefore should not consolidate its investments in these entities . during 2006 , these entities acquired an additional $ 4.8 bil- lion of international paper debt securities for cash , resulting in a total of approximately $ 5.2 billion of international paper debt obligations held by these entities at december 31 , 2006 . since international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset its obligations under these debt instruments with its investments in the entities , international paper has offset $ 5.0 billion of interest in the entities against $ 5.0 billion of international paper debt obligations held by the entities as of december 31 , 2007 . international paper also holds variable interests in two financing entities that were used to monetize long-term notes received from sales of forestlands in 2002 and 2001 . see note 8 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for a further discussion of these transactions . capital resources outlook for 2008 international paper expects to be able to meet pro- jected capital expenditures , service existing debt and meet working capital and dividend requirements during 2008 through current cash balances and cash from operations , supplemented as required by its various existing credit facilities . international paper has approximately $ 2.5 billion of committed bank credit agreements , which management believes is adequate to cover expected operating cash flow variability during our industry 2019s economic cycles . the agreements generally provide for interest rates at a floating rate index plus a pre-determined margin dependent upon international paper 2019s credit rating . the agreements include a $ 1.5 billion fully commit- ted revolving bank credit agreement that expires in march 2011 and has a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) payable quarterly . these agreements also include up to $ 1.0 billion of available commercial paper-based financ- ings under a receivables securitization program that expires in october 2009 with a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) . at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings under either the bank credit agreements or receiv- ables securitization program . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capi- tal structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2007 . principal financial covenants include maintenance of a minimum net worth , defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock , plus any goodwill impairment charges , of $ 9 billion ; and a maximum total debt to capital ratio , defined as total debt divided by total debt plus net worth , of 60% ( 60 % ) . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2007 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) and moody 2019s investor services ( moody 2019s ) , respectively . the company currently has short-term credit ratings by s&p and moody 2019s of a-2 and p-3 , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2007 , were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter maturities of long-term debt ( a ) $ 267 $ 1300 $ 1069 $ 396 $ 532 $ 3056 debt obligations with right of offset ( b ) 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 5000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>maturities of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 1300</td><td>$ 1069</td><td>$ 396</td><td>$ 532</td><td>$ 3056</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt obligations with right of offset ( b )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>5000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>136</td><td>116</td><td>101</td><td>84</td><td>67</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>1953</td><td>294</td><td>261</td><td>235</td><td>212</td><td>1480</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ( d )</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1710</td><td>$ 1431</td><td>$ 715</td><td>$ 811</td><td>$ 9628</td></tr></table> ( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its con- solidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2007 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.0 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.0 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 8 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements ) . ( c ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales . ( d ) not included in the above table are unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $ 280 million. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2007, what was the amount of the maturities of long-term debt from the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations for 2008?\nAnswer: 267.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of those contractual obligations?\nAnswer: 2356.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?\nAnswer: 0.11333\nQuestion: and what was this percentage representation for the next year, of 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.76023" } ]
CONVFINQA9816	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2015 and 2014. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2015</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 101.88</td><td>$ 93.21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>98.64</td><td>91.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>101.54</td><td>86.83</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>104.12</td><td>87.23</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 84.90</td><td>$ 78.38</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>90.73</td><td>80.10</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>99.90</td><td>89.05</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>106.31</td><td>90.20</td></tr></table> on february 19 , 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 87.32 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 19 , 2016 , we had 423897556 outstanding shares of common stock and 159 registered holders . dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) . generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) . we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a , issued in may 2014 ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) . dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors . the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant . we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 2.3 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2016 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we declared the following cash distributions: .\nQuestion: what was the change in the price of shares from the highest value, during the quarter ended december 31 , 2015, to the closing price on february 19 , 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-16.8" } ]
CONVFINQA5563	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 included $ 1635 million , net of $ 953 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2017 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 398</td><td>$ 173</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>359</td><td>156</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>297</td><td>164</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>259</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>221</td><td>147</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1115</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 2649</td><td>$ 1079</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-187 ( 187 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 892</td></tr></table> approximately 97% ( 97 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 480 million in 2017 , $ 535 million in 2016 , and $ 590 million in 2015 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 5% ( 5 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2017 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 285 million to $ 310 million . we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .\nQuestion: what is the total value of operating leases?\nAnswer: 2649.0\nQuestion: what is the total value of capital leases?\nAnswer: 1079.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 3728.0\nQuestion: what is the value of operating leases divided by the total sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.71057" } ]
CONVFINQA6729	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense including special items noted below</td><td>$ 27.6</td><td>$ 91.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>settlements termination benefits and curtailments ( \"special items\" )</td><td>7.2</td><td>48.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 service cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td><td>6.9% ( 6.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr></table> pension expense decreased from the prior year due to lower pension settlements , lower loss amortization , primarily from favorable asset experience and the impact of higher discount rates , partially offset by lower expected returns on assets . special items ( settlements , termination benefits , and curtailments ) decreased from the prior year primarily due to lower pension settlement losses . in fiscal year 2019 , special items of $ 7.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , of which $ 5.0 was recorded during the second quarter and related to the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .8 of termination benefits . these amounts are reflected within \"other non- operating income ( expense ) , net\" on the consolidated income statements . in fiscal year 2018 , special items of $ 48.9 included a pension settlement loss of $ 43.7 primarily in connection with the transfer of certain pension assets and payment obligations for our u.s . salaried and hourly plans to an insurer during the fourth quarter , $ 4.8 of pension settlement losses related to lump sum payouts from the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .4 of termination benefits . u.k . lloyds equalization ruling on 26 october 2018 , the united kingdom high court issued a ruling related to the equalization of pension plan participants 2019 benefits for the gender effects of guaranteed minimum pensions . as a result of this ruling , we estimated the impact of retroactively increasing benefits in our u.k . plan in accordance with the high court ruling . we treated the additional benefits as a prior service cost , which resulted in an increase to our projected benefit obligation and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 4.7 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 . we are amortizing this cost over the average remaining life expectancy of the u.k . participants . 2020 outlook in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to be approximately $ 5 to $ 20 , which includes expected pension settlement losses of $ 5 to $ 10 , depending on the timing of retirements . the expected range reflects lower expected interest cost and higher total assets , partially offset by higher expected loss amortization primarily due to the impact of lower discount rates . in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 105 for amortization of actuarial losses . in fiscal year 2019 , pension expense included amortization of actuarial losses of $ 76.2 . net actuarial losses of $ 424.4 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in fiscal year 2019 . actuarial ( gains ) losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial ( gains ) losses and resulting amortization in years beyond fiscal year 2020 . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third-party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2019 and 2018 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 40.2 and $ 68.3 , respectively . for fiscal year 2020 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 30 to $ 40 . the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon the timing of retirements . actual future contributions will depend on future funding legislation , discount rates , investment performance , plan design , and various other factors . refer to the contractual obligations discussion on page 37 for a projection of future contributions. .\nQuestion: how much is the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 expected to represent in relation to that pension expense's amortization in 2019?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.37795" } ]
CONVFINQA11017	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother taxes decreased in 2001 because its utility operations in virginia became subject to state income taxes in lieu of gross receipts taxes effective january 2001 . in addition , dominion recognized higher effective rates for foreign earnings and higher pretax income in relation to non-conventional fuel tax credits realized . dominion energy 2002 2001 2000 ( millions , except per share amounts ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions except pershare amounts )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenue</td><td>$ 5940</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 4894</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>4520</td><td>4749</td><td>3939</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income contribution</td><td>770</td><td>723</td><td>489</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>earnings per share contribution</td><td>$ 2.72</td><td>$ 2.86</td><td>$ 2.07</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity supplied* ( million mwhrs )</td><td>101</td><td>95</td><td>83</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gas transmission throughput ( bcf )</td><td>597</td><td>553</td><td>567</td></tr></table> * amounts presented are for electricity supplied by utility and merchant generation operations . operating results 2014 2002 dominion energy contributed $ 2.72 per diluted share on net income of $ 770 million for 2002 , a net income increase of $ 47 million and an earnings per share decrease of $ 0.14 over 2001 . net income for 2002 reflected lower operating revenue ( $ 204 million ) , operating expenses ( $ 229 million ) and other income ( $ 27 million ) . interest expense and income taxes , which are discussed on a consolidated basis , decreased $ 50 million over 2001 . the earnings per share decrease reflected share dilution . regulated electric sales revenue increased $ 179 million . favorable weather conditions , reflecting increased cooling and heating degree-days , as well as customer growth , are estimated to have contributed $ 133 million and $ 41 million , respectively . fuel rate recoveries increased approximately $ 65 million for 2002 . these recoveries are generally offset by increases in elec- tric fuel expense and do not materially affect income . partially offsetting these increases was a net decrease of $ 60 million due to other factors not separately measurable , such as the impact of economic conditions on customer usage , as well as variations in seasonal rate premiums and discounts . nonregulated electric sales revenue increased $ 9 million . sales revenue from dominion 2019s merchant generation fleet decreased $ 21 million , reflecting a $ 201 million decline due to lower prices partially offset by sales from assets acquired and constructed in 2002 and the inclusion of millstone operations for all of 2002 . revenue from the wholesale marketing of utility generation decreased $ 74 million . due to the higher demand of utility service territory customers during 2002 , less production from utility plant generation was available for profitable sale in the wholesale market . revenue from retail energy sales increased $ 71 million , reflecting primarily customer growth over the prior year . net revenue from dominion 2019s electric trading activities increased $ 33 million , reflecting the effect of favorable price changes on unsettled contracts and higher trading margins . nonregulated gas sales revenue decreased $ 351 million . the decrease included a $ 239 million decrease in sales by dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing opera- tions , reflecting to a large extent declining prices . revenue associated with gas trading operations , net of related cost of sales , decreased $ 112 million . the decrease included $ 70 mil- lion of realized and unrealized losses on the economic hedges of natural gas production by the dominion exploration & pro- duction segment . as described below under selected information 2014 energy trading activities , sales of natural gas by the dominion exploration & production segment at market prices offset these financial losses , resulting in a range of prices contemplated by dominion 2019s overall risk management strategy . the remaining $ 42 million decrease was due to unfavorable price changes on unsettled contracts and lower overall trading margins . those losses were partially offset by contributions from higher trading volumes in gas and oil markets . gas transportation and storage revenue decreased $ 44 million , primarily reflecting lower rates . electric fuel and energy purchases expense increased $ 94 million which included an increase of $ 66 million associated with dominion 2019s energy marketing operations that are not sub- ject to cost-based rate regulation and an increase of $ 28 million associated with utility operations . substantially all of the increase associated with non-regulated energy marketing opera- tions related to higher volumes purchased during the year . for utility operations , energy costs increased $ 66 million for pur- chases subject to rate recovery , partially offset by a $ 38 million decrease in fuel expenses associated with lower wholesale mar- keting of utility plant generation . purchased gas expense decreased $ 245 million associated with dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing oper- ations . this decrease reflected approximately $ 162 million asso- ciated with declining prices and $ 83 million associated with lower purchased volumes . liquids , pipeline capacity and other purchases decreased $ 64 million , primarily reflecting comparably lower levels of rate recoveries of certain costs of transmission operations in the cur- rent year period . the difference between actual expenses and amounts recovered in the period are deferred pending future rate adjustments . other operations and maintenance expense decreased $ 14 million , primarily reflecting an $ 18 million decrease in outage costs due to fewer generation unit outages in the current year . depreciation expense decreased $ 11 million , reflecting decreases in depreciation associated with changes in the esti- mated useful lives of certain electric generation property , par- tially offset by increased depreciation associated with state line and millstone operations . other income decreased $ 27 million , including a $ 14 mil- lion decrease in net realized investment gains in the millstone 37d o m i n i o n 2019 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t .\nQuestion: what was operating revenue in 2001?\nAnswer: 6144.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2000?\nAnswer: 4894.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1250.0" } ]
CONVFINQA408	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2008 was $ 882 million and for 2007 was $ 1.467 billion . total revenue for 2008 increased 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2007 . we created positive operating leverage in the year-to-date comparison as total noninterest expense increased 3% ( 3 % ) in the comparison . net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 dollars in millions</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 3823</td><td>$ 2915</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.37% ( 3.37 % )</td><td>3.00% ( 3.00 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see statistical information 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest ( unaudited ) income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 of this report for additional information . the 31% ( 31 % ) increase in net interest income for 2008 compared with 2007 was favorably impacted by the $ 16.5 billion , or 17% ( 17 % ) , increase in average interest-earning assets and a decrease in funding costs . the 2008 net interest margin was positively affected by declining rates paid on deposits and borrowings compared with the prior year . the reasons driving the higher interest-earning assets in these comparisons are further discussed in the balance sheet highlights portion of the executive summary section of this item 7 . the net interest margin was 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) for 2008 and 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) for 2007 . the following factors impacted the comparison : 2022 a decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities of 140 basis points . the rate paid on interest-bearing deposits , the single largest component , decreased 123 basis points . 2022 these factors were partially offset by a 77 basis point decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets . the yield on loans , the single largest component , decreased 109 basis points . 2022 in addition , the impact of noninterest-bearing sources of funding decreased 26 basis points due to lower interest rates and a lower proportion of noninterest- bearing sources of funding to interest-earning assets . for comparing to the broader market , during 2008 the average federal funds rate was 1.94% ( 1.94 % ) compared with 5.03% ( 5.03 % ) for 2007 . we expect our full-year 2009 net interest income to benefit from the impact of interest accretion of discounts resulting from purchase accounting marks and deposit pricing alignment related to our national city acquisition . we also currently expect our 2009 net interest margin to improve on a year-over-year basis . noninterest income summary noninterest income was $ 3.367 billion for 2008 and $ 3.790 billion for 2007 . noninterest income for 2008 included the following : 2022 gains of $ 246 million related to the mark-to-market adjustment on our blackrock ltip shares obligation , 2022 losses related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale of $ 197 million , net of hedges , 2022 impairment and other losses related to alternative investments of $ 179 million , 2022 income from hilliard lyons totaling $ 164 million , including the first quarter gain of $ 114 million from the sale of this business , 2022 net securities losses of $ 206 million , 2022 a first quarter gain of $ 95 million related to the redemption of a portion of our visa class b common shares related to visa 2019s march 2008 initial public offering , 2022 a third quarter $ 61 million reversal of a legal contingency reserve established in connection with an acquisition due to a settlement , 2022 trading losses of $ 55 million , 2022 a $ 35 million impairment charge on commercial mortgage servicing rights , and 2022 equity management losses of $ 24 million . noninterest income for 2007 included the following : 2022 the impact of $ 82 million gain recognized in connection with our transfer of blackrock shares to satisfy a portion of pnc 2019s ltip obligation and a $ 209 million net loss on our ltip shares obligation , 2022 income from hilliard lyons totaling $ 227 million , 2022 trading income of $ 104 million , 2022 equity management gains of $ 102 million , and 2022 gains related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale of $ 3 million , net of hedges . apart from the impact of these items , noninterest income increased $ 16 million in 2008 compared with 2007 . additional analysis fund servicing fees increased $ 69 million in 2008 , to $ 904 million , compared with $ 835 million in 2007 . the impact of the december 2007 acquisition of albridge solutions inc . ( 201calbridge solutions 201d ) and growth in global investment servicing 2019s offshore operations were the primary drivers of this increase . global investment servicing provided fund accounting/ administration services for $ 839 billion of net fund investment assets and provided custody services for $ 379 billion of fund .\nQuestion: what is the sum of net interest margin in 2007 and 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6.37" } ]
CONVFINQA4820	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 27 of 100 other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases , purchase obligations and other commitments in effect at december 31 , 2010 , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) less than1 year</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) more than5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt including capital leases</td><td>$ 2750.1</td><td>$ 34.5</td><td>$ 188.3</td><td>$ 367.1</td><td>$ 2160.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( b )</td><td>1267.5</td><td>160.5</td><td>316.4</td><td>304.2</td><td>486.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>93.2</td><td>31.1</td><td>37.1</td><td>16.6</td><td>8.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>6586.9</td><td>2709.5</td><td>3779.4</td><td>98.0</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total payments on contractual obligations</td><td>$ 10697.7</td><td>$ 2935.6</td><td>$ 4321.2</td><td>$ 785.9</td><td>$ 2655.0</td></tr></table> total payments on contractual obligations $ 10697.7 $ 2935.6 $ 4321.2 $ 785.9 $ 2655.0 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end 2010 exchange rates . ( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end and do not contemplate the effects of hedging instruments . ( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel and other direct materials . also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items . in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used . depending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may or may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly . the table above does not include $ 60.1 million of uncertain tax positions , the timing of which is uncertain . contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be in the range of $ 30 million in 2011 . this estimate may change based on changes in the pension protection act and actual plan asset performance , among other factors . benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 71.4 million , $ 74.0 million , $ 77.1 million , $ 80.3 million and $ 84.9 million for the years ending december 31 , 2011 through 2015 , respectively , and a total of $ 483.1 million for the years 2016 through 2020 . payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be between $ 21.8 million ( 20ac16.5 million ) to $ 23.2 million ( 20ac17.5 million ) in each of the years 2011 through 2015 and a total of $ 102.7 million ( 20ac77.5 million ) for the years 2016 through 2020 . for the u.s . pension plans in 2011 , we changed our return on asset assumption to 8.00 percent ( from 8.25 percent in 2010 ) and our discount rate assumption to an average of 5.55 percent ( from 6.00 percent in 2010 ) . based on the changes in assumptions , pension expense in 2011 is anticipated to be relatively flat compared to 2010 . a reduction of the expected return on pension assets assumption by a quarter of a percentage point would result in an estimated $ 2.9 million increase in the 2011 global pension expense , while a quarter of a percentage point reduction in the discount rate applied to the pension liability would result in an estimated $ 3.5 million of additional pension expense in 2011 . additional information regarding the company 2019s pension plans is provided in note 14 accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 20 cents per share in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 . total dividends paid were $ 35.8 million in 2010 , $ 37.4 million in 2009 and $ 37.5 million in 2008 . on january 26 , 2011 , the company 2019s board of directors approved an increase in the quarterly dividends to 7 cents per share . share repurchases our share repurchases , net of issuances , totaled $ 506.7 million in 2010 , $ 5.1 million in 2009 and $ 299.6 million in 2008 . on november 2 , 2010 , we acquired 2775408 shares of our publicly held common stock in a private transaction for $ 88.8 million . on february 17 , 2010 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement to buy $ 125.0 million of our common shares using cash on hand and available borrowings . we advanced the $ 125.0 million on february 22 , 2010 , and received 4323598 shares , which represented 90 percent of the total shares as calculated using the previous day 2019s closing price . the agreement was settled on may 20 , 2010 , and the company received an additional 398206 shares . net repurchases in 2008 included a $ 31 million settlement on january 7 , 2008 , of a forward contract entered into in december 2007 for the repurchase of 1350000 shares . from january 1 through february 24 , 2011 , ball repurchased an additional $ 143.3 million of its common stock. .\nQuestion: what is the value of the settlement times 10000000?\nAnswer: 31000000.0\nQuestion: what were the number of shares under the repurchase settlement contract?\nAnswer: 1350000.0\nQuestion: what is the value divided by the number of shares?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22.96296" } ]
CONVFINQA7860	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncross-border outstandings cross-border outstandings , as defined by bank regulatory rules , are amounts payable to state street by residents of foreign countries , regardless of the currency in which the claim is denominated , and local country claims in excess of local country obligations . these cross-border outstandings consist primarily of deposits with banks , loan and lease financing and investment securities . in addition to credit risk , cross-border outstandings have the risk that , as a result of political or economic conditions in a country , borrowers may be unable to meet their contractual repayment obligations of principal and/or interest when due because of the unavailability of , or restrictions on , foreign exchange needed by borrowers to repay their obligations . cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united kingdom</td><td>$ 5836</td><td>$ 5951</td><td>$ 5531</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>australia</td><td>2044</td><td>3567</td><td>1519</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>canada</td><td>2014</td><td>4565</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>germany</td><td>2014</td><td>2944</td><td>2696</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total cross-border outstandings</td><td>$ 7880</td><td>$ 17027</td><td>$ 9746</td></tr></table> the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 5% ( 5 % ) , 12% ( 12 % ) and 9% ( 9 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2008 amounted to $ 3.45 billion ( canada and germany ) . there were no cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 . aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) . capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to assess whether our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives . regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors . we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements . our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt . our capital committee , working in conjunction with our asset and liability committee , referred to as alco , oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies . the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve . both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act .\nQuestion: what was the cross border outstandings for the united kingdom in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5836.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8218	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2009 levels , we returned a portion of these assets to active service . at the end of 2010 , we continued to maintain in storage approximately 17% ( 17 % ) of our multiple purpose locomotives and 14% ( 14 % ) of our freight car inventory , reflecting our ability to effectively leverage our assets as volumes return to our network . 2022 fuel prices 2013 fuel prices generally increased throughout 2010 as the economy improved . our average diesel fuel price per gallon increased nearly 20% ( 20 % ) from january to december of 2010 , driven by higher crude oil barrel prices and conversion spreads . compared to 2009 , our diesel fuel price per gallon consumed increased 31% ( 31 % ) , driving operating expenses up by $ 566 million ( excluding any impact from year-over-year volume increases ) . to partially offset the effect of higher fuel prices , we reduced our consumption rate by 3% ( 3 % ) during the year , saving approximately 27 million gallons of fuel . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; increased use of distributed locomotive power ( the practice of distributing locomotives throughout a train rather than positioning them all in the lead resulting in safer and more efficient train operations ) ; fuel conservation programs ; and efficient network operations and asset utilization all contributed to this improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities ( adjusted for the reclassification of our receivables securitization facility ) totaled $ 4.5 billion , yielding record free cash flow of $ 1.4 billion in 2010 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities ( adjusted for the reclassification of our receivables securitization facility ) , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 4105</td><td>$ 3204</td><td>$ 4044</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables securitization facility [a]</td><td>400</td><td>184</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash provided by operating activitiesadjusted for the receivables securitizationfacility</td><td>4505</td><td>3388</td><td>4060</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2488 ( 2488 )</td><td>-2145 ( 2145 )</td><td>-2738 ( 2738 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-602 ( 602 )</td><td>-544 ( 544 )</td><td>-481 ( 481 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 1415</td><td>$ 699</td><td>$ 841</td></tr></table> [a] effective january 1 , 2010 , a new accounting standard required us to account for receivables transferred under our receivables securitization facility as secured borrowings in our consolidated statements of financial position and as financing activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows . the receivables securitization facility is included in our free cash flow calculation to adjust cash provided by operating activities as though our receivables securitization facility had been accounted for under the new accounting standard for all periods presented . 2011 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training , and engaging our employees . we will continue implementing total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc is designed to establish , maintain , reinforce , and promote safe practices among co-workers . this process allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . reducing grade crossing incidents is a critical aspect of our safety programs , and we will continue our efforts to maintain and close crossings ; install video cameras on locomotives ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , various industry programs , and engaging local communities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 to build upon our success in recent years , we will continue evaluating traffic flows and network logistic patterns , which can be quite dynamic , to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations , remove network variability , and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to adjust manpower and our locomotive and rail car fleets to meet customer needs and put .\nQuestion: in 2010, what was the amount from the cash provided by operations that was from receivables securitization facility?\nAnswer: 400.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of that cash provided by operations?\nAnswer: 4505.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total cash is from receivables securitization facility?\nAnswer: 0.08879\nQuestion: in that same year, how much did the cash generated by operating activities represent in relation to the free cash flow?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.21429" } ]
CONVFINQA10330	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncondition are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted average grant date fair values of psus granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>17.23% ( 17.23 % )</td><td>17.40% ( 17.40 % )</td><td>15.90% ( 15.90 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.36% ( 2.36 % )</td><td>1.53% ( 1.53 % )</td><td>0.91% ( 0.91 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grant date fair value per share</td><td>$ 73.62</td><td>$ 72.81</td><td>$ 77.16</td></tr></table> the grant date fair value of psus that vest ratably and have market and/or performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus and psus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus and psus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus and psus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling $ 1 million , less than $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at a discount . prior to february 5 , 2019 , the purchase price of common stock acquired under the espp was the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three -month purchase period . on july 27 , 2018 , the espp was amended , effective february 5 , 2019 , to permit employee participants to acquire company common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at the end of the purchase period . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 1.9 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company issued 95 thousand , 93 thousand and 93 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .\nQuestion: in 2018, what was the total purchase price of the common stock acquired under the espp?\nAnswer: 66.258\nQuestion: and between that year and the previous one, what was the variation in the grant date fair value per share?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.81" } ]
CONVFINQA7634	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2011 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , our receivables securitization facility , and our revolving credit facility , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 1.8 billion of committed credit available under our credit facility , with no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 . we did not make any borrowings under this facility during 2011 . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the receivables securitization facility was $ 100 million as of december 31 , 2011 , and is included in our consolidated statements of financial position as debt due after one year . the receivables securitization facility obligates us to maintain an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper as well as other capital market financings is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to access capital markets as a source of liquidity . access to liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . we expect that we will continue to have access to liquidity by issuing bonds to public or private investors based on our assessment of the current condition of the credit markets . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we had a working capital surplus . this reflects a strong cash position , which provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment . in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2011 2010 2009 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 5873</td><td>$ 4105</td><td>$ 3204</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-3119 ( 3119 )</td><td>-2488 ( 2488 )</td><td>-2145 ( 2145 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-2623 ( 2623 )</td><td>-2381 ( 2381 )</td><td>-458 ( 458 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cashequivalents</td><td>$ 131</td><td>$ -764 ( 764 )</td><td>$ 601</td></tr></table> operating activities higher net income and lower cash income tax payments in 2011 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2010 . the tax relief , unemployment insurance reauthorization , and job creation act of 2010 , enacted in december 2010 , provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 , and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012 . as a result of the act , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011 income tax expense . this deferral decreased 2011 income tax payments , thereby contributing to the positive operating cash flow . in future years , however , additional cash will be used to pay income taxes that were previously deferred . in addition , the adoption of a new accounting standard in january of 2010 changed the accounting treatment for our receivables securitization facility from a sale of undivided interests ( recorded as an operating activity ) to a secured borrowing ( recorded as a financing activity ) , which decreased cash provided by operating activities by $ 400 million in 2010 . higher net income in 2010 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2009 . investing activities higher capital investments partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales in 2011 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2010 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales in 2010 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2009. .\nQuestion: what is the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2010?\nAnswer: 4105.0\nQuestion: what is the impact of adoption of a new accounting standard in cash flow from operation activities?\nAnswer: 400.0\nQuestion: what would be the total value of cash provided by operating activities if the net accounts standards were not adopted?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4505.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1396	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and credit facilities of certain subsidiaries . the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 857.3 and $ 619.4 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities was $ 395.6 and $ 336.5 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 76.9</td><td>$ 31.6</td><td>$ 25.1</td><td>$ 8.9</td><td>$ 26.9</td><td>$ 11.4</td><td>$ 180.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>34.7</td><td>76.5</td><td>32.9</td><td>3.9</td><td>3.1</td><td>4.2</td><td>155.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 111.6</td><td>$ 108.1</td><td>$ 58.0</td><td>$ 12.8</td><td>$ 30.0</td><td>$ 15.6</td><td>$ 336.1</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2016 . these estimated payments of $ 25.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2017 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2018 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 4 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters in the normal course of business , we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company is in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies . the company confirmed that one of its standalone domestic agencies has been contacted by the department of justice antitrust division for documents regarding video production practices and is cooperating with the government. .\nQuestion: what is the value of total redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates in?\nAnswer: 155.3\nQuestion: what about the total contingent acquisition payments?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "336.1" } ]
CONVFINQA8806	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 4273</td><td>$ 6392</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 136</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .\nQuestion: what the balance of carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4273.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7176	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( \"nsai\" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with 5 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( \"ryder scott\" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2014 , 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 101 mmboe from december 31 , 2013 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2014 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>627</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfers to proved developed</td><td>-103 ( 103 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>728</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 included 121 mmboe in the eagle ford and 61 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 67 mmboe in the eagle ford , 26 mmboe in the bakken and 1 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 3149 million , $ 2536 million and $ 1995 million . a total of 102 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2014 , 19 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled in the second quarter of 2015 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to develop , is executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region lead to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes and civil unrest in 2013-2014 have also extended the project duration . as of december 31 , 2014 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped crude oil and condensate , ngls , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2015 through 2019 are projected to be $ 2915 million , $ 2598 million , $ 2493 million , $ 2669 million and $ 2745 million. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of undeveloped reserves throughout 2014?\nAnswer: 101.0\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to that total in the beginning of the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.13874" } ]
CONVFINQA7327	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 2003 were $ 10.08 , $ 7.05 , and $ 6.32 per share , respectively . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows : july 1 , 2005 2013 december 31 , 2005 january 1 , 2005 2013 june 30 , 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>july 1 2005 2013 december 31 2005</td><td>january 1 2005 2013 june 30 2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>approximate risk-free interest rate</td><td>3.22% ( 3.22 % ) - 4.40% ( 4.40 % )</td><td>4.17% ( 4.17 % ) - 4.40% ( 4.40 % )</td><td>4.23% ( 4.23 % )</td><td>4.00% ( 4.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>6.25 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock</td><td>29.6% ( 29.6 % )</td><td>75.3% ( 75.3 % ) - 79.2% ( 79.2 % )</td><td>80.6% ( 80.6 % )</td><td>86.6% ( 86.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans )</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , pursuant to which the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase a total of 1831981 shares of its class a common stock having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , provided for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant atc mexico stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) . the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico . the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure . during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . as described in note 11 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 . no options under the atc mexico plan were outstanding as of december 31 , 2005 . ( see note 11. ) atc south america stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc south america subsidiary ( atc south america plan ) . the atc south america plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc south america . the atc south america plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 6144 shares , ( an approximate 10.3% ( 10.3 % ) interest on a fully-diluted basis ) , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc south america 2019s capital structure . during 2004 , atc south america granted options to purchase 6024 shares of atc south america common stock to officers and employees , including messrs . gearon and hess , who received options to purchase an approximate 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) and 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) interest , respectively . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 1349 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value on the date of issuance as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc south america plan options granted during 2004 were $ 79 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . options granted vest upon the earlier to occur of ( a ) the exercise by or on behalf of mr . gearon of his right to sell his interest in atc south america to the company , ( b ) the .\nQuestion: what was stock volatility in 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "80.6" } ]
CONVFINQA10768	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 , and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 net sales to increase in 2014 in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in net sales from f-35 production contracts . operating profit is expected to increase slightly from 2013 , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between the years due to program mix . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions , and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8367</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>759</td><td>808</td><td>874</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8300</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 479 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of about $ 495 million due to decreased volume on various programs ( command and control programs for classified customers , ngi , and eram programs ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to the completion of certain programs ( such as total information processing support services , the transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) , and odin ) . the decrease was partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 340 million due to the start-up of certain programs ( such as the disa gsm-o and the national science foundation antarctic support ) . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 49 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 55 million due to certain programs nearing the end of their lifecycles , partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 15 million due to the start-up of certain programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were comparable for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford; .\nQuestion: what was the overall total decline in net sales?\nAnswer: 815.0\nQuestion: and what was the offsetting increase to that decline due to the start-up of certain programs?\nAnswer: 340.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does this offsetting increase represent in relation to that overall decline, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.41718" } ]
CONVFINQA2543	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 8.26 billion for 2011 , 2% ( 2 % ) higher than 2010 . during 2011 , average volatility levels increased and equity prices in europe and asia declined significantly , particularly during the third quarter . the increase in net revenues reflected higher commissions and fees , primarily due to higher market volumes , particularly during the third quarter of 2011 . in addition , net revenues in securities services increased compared with 2010 , reflecting the impact of higher average customer balances . equities client execution net revenues were lower than 2010 , primarily reflecting significantly lower net revenues in shares . the net gain attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 , compared with a net gain of $ 198 million ( $ 188 million and $ 10 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2010 . institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by increased concerns regarding the weakened state of global economies , including heightened european sovereign debt risk , and its impact on the european banking system and global financial institutions . these conditions also impacted expectations for economic prospects in the united states and were reflected in equity and debt markets more broadly . in addition , the downgrade in credit ratings of the u.s . government and federal agencies and many financial institutions during the second half of 2011 contributed to further uncertainty in the markets . these concerns , as well as other broad market concerns , such as uncertainty over financial regulatory reform , continued to have a negative impact on our net revenues during 2011 . operating expenses were $ 12.84 billion for 2011 , 14% ( 14 % ) lower than 2010 , due to decreased compensation and benefits expenses , primarily resulting from lower net revenues , lower net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings ( 2010 included $ 550 million related to a settlement with the sec ) , the impact of the u.k . bank payroll tax during 2010 , as well as an impairment of our nyse dmm rights of $ 305 million during 2010 . these decreases were partially offset by higher brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , principally reflecting higher transaction volumes in equities . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.44 billion in 2011 , 35% ( 35 % ) lower than 2010 . investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , real estate , consolidated investment entities and power generation facilities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td><td>year ended december 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>icbc</td><td>$ 408</td><td>$ -517 ( 517 )</td><td>$ 747</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity securities ( excluding icbc )</td><td>2392</td><td>1120</td><td>2692</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt securities and loans</td><td>1850</td><td>96</td><td>2597</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>1241</td><td>1443</td><td>1505</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>5891</td><td>2142</td><td>7541</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>2666</td><td>2673</td><td>3361</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>pre-tax earnings/ ( loss )</td><td>$ 3225</td><td>$ -531 ( 531 )</td><td>$ 4180</td></tr></table> 2012 versus 2011 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 5.89 billion and $ 2.14 billion for 2012 and 2011 , respectively . during 2012 , investing & lending net revenues were positively impacted by tighter credit spreads and an increase in global equity prices . results for 2012 included a gain of $ 408 million from our investment in the ordinary shares of icbc , net gains of $ 2.39 billion from other investments in equities , primarily in private equities , net gains and net interest income of $ 1.85 billion from debt securities and loans , and other net revenues of $ 1.24 billion , principally related to our consolidated investment entities . if equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.67 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . pre-tax earnings were $ 3.23 billion in 2012 , compared with a pre-tax loss of $ 531 million in 2011 . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 55 .\nQuestion: in the year of 2012, what percentage of the total net revenues were due to equity securities ( excluding icbc ) revenues?\nAnswer: 0.40604\nQuestion: and what was that percentage representation in the previous year, in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.52288" } ]
CONVFINQA383	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ngrowth focused . for example , in december 2005 , 3m announced its intention to build an lcd optical film manufacturing facility in poland to support the fast-growing lcd-tv market in europe and to better serve its customers . the company expects 2006 capital expenditures to total approximately $ 1.1 billion , compared with $ 943 million in 2005 . in the third quarter of 2005 , 3m completed the acquisition of cuno . 3m acquired cuno for approximately $ 1.36 billion , including assumption of debt . this $ 1.36 billion included $ 1.27 billion of cash paid ( net of cash acquired ) and the assumption of $ 80 million of debt , most of which has been repaid . in 2005 , the company also entered into two additional business combinations for a total purchase price of $ 27 million . refer to note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on these 2005 business combinations , and for information concerning 2004 and 2003 business combinations . purchases of investments in 2005 include the purchase from ti&m beteiligungsgesellschaft mbh of 19 percent of i&t innovation technology ( discussed previously under the transportation business segment ) . the purchase price of approximately $ 55 million is reported as 201cinvestments 201d in the consolidated balance sheet and as 201cpurchases of investments 201d in the consolidated statement of cash flows . other 201cpurchases of investments 201d and 201cproceeds from sale of investments 201d in 2005 are primarily attributable to auction rate securities , which are classified as available-for-sale . prior to 2005 , purchases of and proceeds from the sale of auction rate securities were classified as cash and cash equivalents . at december 31 , 2004 , the amount of such securities taken as a whole was immaterial to cash and cash equivalents , and accordingly were not reclassified for 2004 and prior . proceeds from the sale of investments in 2003 include $ 26 million of cash received related to the sale of 3m 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership in durel corporation to rogers corporation . additional purchases of investments totaled $ 5 million in 2005 , $ 10 million in 2004 and $ 16 million in 2003 . these purchases include additional survivor benefit insurance and equity investments . the company is actively considering additional acquisitions , investments and strategic alliances . cash flows from financing activities : years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>change in short-term debt 2014 net</td><td>$ -258 ( 258 )</td><td>$ 399</td><td>$ -215 ( 215 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>repayment of debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>-656 ( 656 )</td><td>-868 ( 868 )</td><td>-719 ( 719 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>429</td><td>358</td><td>494</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total change in debt</td><td>$ -485 ( 485 )</td><td>$ -111 ( 111 )</td><td>$ -440 ( 440 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchases of treasury stock</td><td>-2377 ( 2377 )</td><td>-1791 ( 1791 )</td><td>-685 ( 685 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reissuances of treasury stock</td><td>545</td><td>508</td><td>555</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends paid to stockholders</td><td>-1286 ( 1286 )</td><td>-1125 ( 1125 )</td><td>-1034 ( 1034 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>distributions to minority interests and other 2014 net</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>$ -3679 ( 3679 )</td><td>$ -2534 ( 2534 )</td><td>$ -1627 ( 1627 )</td></tr></table> total debt at december 31 , 2005 , was $ 2.381 billion , down from $ 2.821 billion at year-end 2004 , with the decrease primarily attributable to the retirement of $ 400 million in medium-term notes . there were no new long- term debt issuances in 2005 . in 2005 , the cash flow decrease in net short-term debt of $ 258 million includes the portion of short-term debt with original maturities of 90 days or less . the repayment of debt of $ 656 million primarily related to the retirement of $ 400 million in medium-term notes and commercial paper retirements . proceeds from debt of $ 429 million primarily related to commercial paper issuances . total debt was 19% ( 19 % ) of total capital ( total capital is defined as debt plus equity ) , compared with 21% ( 21 % ) at year-end 2004 . debt securities , including the company 2019s shelf registration , its medium-term notes program , dealer remarketable securities and convertible note , are all discussed in more detail in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . 3m has a shelf registration and medium-term notes program through which $ 1.5 billion of medium- term notes may be offered . in 2004 , the company issued approximately $ 62 million in debt securities under its medium-term notes program . no debt was issued under this program in 2005 . the medium-term notes program and shelf registration have remaining capacity of approximately $ 1.438 billion . the company 2019s $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities ( classified as current portion of long-term debt ) were remarketed for one year in december 2005 . in addition , the company has convertible notes with a book value of $ 539 million at december 31 , 2005 . the next put option date for these convertible notes is november 2007 , thus at year-end 2005 this debt .\nQuestion: what was the change in net cash used in financing activities from the year of 2004 to 2005, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1145.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6822	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1509.7</td><td>$ 1667.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 150.1</td><td>$ 107.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1610.3</td><td>1612.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1762.3</td><td>$ 1722.2</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. .\nQuestion: what was the value of dividends paid for the year?\nAnswer: 195.5\nQuestion: how many shares were repurchased?\nAnswer: 13.6\nQuestion: what is the value of dividends paid over number of shares?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "14.375" } ]
CONVFINQA698	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2014 to 2013 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013 net revenue</td><td>$ 5524</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>miso deferral</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 5735</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2013 and july 2014 . energy efficiency revenues are offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have minimal effect on net income ; 2022 the effect of the apsc 2019s order in entergy arkansas 2019s 2013 rate case , including an annual base rate increase effective january 2014 offset by a miso rider to provide customers credits in rates for transmission revenue received through miso ; 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mspc , effective september 2013 ; 2022 an increase in entergy mississippi 2019s storm damage rider , as approved by the mpsc , effective october 2013 . the increase in the storm damage rider is offset by other operation and maintenance expenses and has no effect on net income ; 2022 an annual base rate increase at entergy texas , effective april 2014 , as a result of the puct 2019s order in the september 2013 rate case ; and 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate proceedings . the asset retirement obligation affects net revenue because entergy records a regulatory debit or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation- related costs collected in revenue . the variance is primarily caused by increases in regulatory credits because of decreases in decommissioning trust earnings and increases in depreciation and accretion expenses and increases in regulatory credits to realign the asset retirement obligation regulatory assets with regulatory treatment . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 3129 gwh , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in billed electricity usage primarily due to an increase in sales to industrial customers and the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansions , recovery of a major refining customer from an unplanned outage in 2013 , and continued moderate growth in the manufacturing sector . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of the non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc , partially offset by the deferral in april 2013 , as approved by the apsc , of costs incurred from march 2010 through december 2012 related to the transition and implementation of joining the miso .\nQuestion: what was the net revenue in 2014?\nAnswer: 5735.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013?\nAnswer: 5524.0\nQuestion: by how much, then, did it change over the year?\nAnswer: 211.0\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percent of the 2013 net revenue?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.0382" } ]
CONVFINQA2995	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nincreased over 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 , costs for trucking services provided by intermodal carriers remained flat as we substantially reduced expenses associated with network inefficiencies . higher diesel fuel prices increased sales and use taxes in 2005 , which resulted in higher state and local taxes . other contract expenses for equipment maintenance and other services increased in 2005 . the 2005 january west coast storm and hurricanes katrina and rita also contributed to higher expenses in 2005 ( net of insurance settlements received ) . partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in relocation expenses as we incurred higher relocation costs associated with moving support personnel to omaha , nebraska during 2004 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>% ( % ) change 2006 v 2005</td><td>% ( % ) change 2005 v 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td><td>( 19 ) % ( % )</td><td>65% ( 65 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td><td>-504 ( 504 )</td><td>-527 ( 527 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-919 ( 919 )</td><td>-410 ( 410 )</td><td>-252 ( 252 )</td><td>124</td><td>63</td></tr></table> other income 2013 lower net gains from non-operating asset sales and higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program resulted in a reduction in other income in 2006 , which was partially offset by higher rental income for the use of our right-of-way ( including 2006 settlements of rate disputes from prior years ) and cash investment returns due to higher interest rates . in 2005 , other income increased largely as a result of higher gains from real estate sales partially offset by higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program . interest expense 2013 lower interest expense in 2006 and 2005 was primarily due to declining weighted-average debt levels of $ 7.1 billion , $ 7.8 billion , and $ 8.1 billion in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . a higher effective interest rate of 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) in 2006 , compared to 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) in both 2005 and 2004 , partially offset the effects of the declining debt level . income taxes 2013 income tax expense was $ 509 million higher in 2006 than 2005 . higher pre-tax income resulted in additional taxes of $ 414 million and $ 118 million of the increase resulted from the one-time reduction in 2005 described below . our effective tax rate was 36.4% ( 36.4 % ) and 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . income taxes were greater in 2005 than 2004 due to higher pre-tax income partially offset by a previously reported reduction in income tax expense . in our quarterly report on form 10-q for the quarter ended june 30 , 2005 , we reported that the corporation analyzed the impact that final settlements of pre-1995 tax years had on previously recorded estimates of deferred tax assets and liabilities . the completed analysis of the final settlements for pre-1995 tax years , along with internal revenue service examination reports for tax years 1995 through 2002 were considered , among other things , in a review and re-evaluation of the corporation 2019s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of september 30 , 2005 , resulting in an income tax expense reduction of $ 118 million in .\nQuestion: what was the other income for 2006?\nAnswer: 118.0\nQuestion: and for 2005?\nAnswer: 145.0\nQuestion: combined, what is the total value for these years?\nAnswer: 263.0\nQuestion: and including 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "351.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1649	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued other 2014 in connection with the construction of its development projects and related infrastructure , certain public agencies require posting of performance and surety bonds to guarantee that the company 2019s obligations are satisfied . these bonds expire upon the completion of the improvements and infrastructure . as of december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately $ 45.3 million in performance and surety bonds outstanding . as of december 31 , 2010 , the company had accrued $ 3.8 million in connection with a legal claim related to a previously sold ground-up development project . the company is currently negotiating with the plaintiff to settle this claim and believes that the prob- able settlement amount will approximate the amount accrued . the company is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . management believes that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position , results of operations or liquidity of the company . 23 . incentive plans : the company maintains two equity participation plans , the second amended and restated 1998 equity participation plan ( the 201cprior plan 201d ) and the 2010 equity participation plan ( the 201c2010 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . the prior plan provides for a maxi- mum of 47000000 shares of the company 2019s common stock to be issued for qualified and non-qualified options and restricted stock grants . the 2010 plan provides for a maximum of 5000000 shares of the company 2019s common stock to be issued for qualified and non-qualified options , restricted stock , performance awards and other awards , plus the number of shares of common stock which are or become available for issuance under the prior plan and which are not thereafter issued under the prior plan , subject to certain conditions . unless otherwise determined by the board of directors at its sole discretion , options granted under the plans generally vest ratably over a range of three to five years , expire ten years from the date of grant and are exercisable at the market price on the date of grant . restricted stock grants generally vest ( i ) 100% ( 100 % ) on the fourth or fifth anniversary of the grant , ( ii ) ratably over three or four years or ( iii ) over three years at 50% ( 50 % ) after two years and 50% ( 50 % ) after the third year . performance share awards may provide a right to receive shares of restricted stock based on the company 2019s performance relative to its peers , as defined , or based on other performance criteria as determined by the board of directors . in addition , the plans provide for the granting of certain options and restricted stock to each of the company 2019s non-employee directors ( the 201cindependent directors 201d ) and permits such independent directors to elect to receive deferred stock awards in lieu of directors 2019 fees . the company accounts for stock options in accordance with fasb 2019s compensation 2014stock compensation guidance which requires that all share based payments to employees , including grants of employee stock options , be recognized in the statement of operations over the service period based on their fair values . the fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing formula . the assump- tion for expected volatility has a significant affect on the grant date fair value . volatility is determined based on the historical equity of common stock for the most recent historical period equal to the expected term of the options plus an implied volatility measure . the more significant assumptions underlying the determination of fair values for options granted during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were as follows : year ended december 31 , 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2010 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2010 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average fair value of options granted</td><td>$ 3.82</td><td>$ 3.16</td><td>$ 5.73</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rates</td><td>2.40% ( 2.40 % )</td><td>2.54% ( 2.54 % )</td><td>3.13% ( 3.13 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>6.25</td><td>6.25</td><td>6.38</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected volatility</td><td>37.98% ( 37.98 % )</td><td>45.81% ( 45.81 % )</td><td>26.16% ( 26.16 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected dividend yield</td><td>4.21% ( 4.21 % )</td><td>5.48% ( 5.48 % )</td><td>4.33% ( 4.33 % )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in the weighted average fair value of options granted throughout 2010?\nAnswer: 0.66\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to that weighted average fair value in the beginning of the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.20886" } ]
CONVFINQA8411	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe authorized costs of $ 76 are to be recovered via a surcharge over a twenty-year period beginning october 2012 . surcharges collected as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were $ 4 and $ 5 , respectively . in addition to the authorized costs , the company expects to incur additional costs totaling $ 34 , which will be recovered from contributions made by the california state coastal conservancy . contributions collected as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were $ 8 and $ 5 , respectively . regulatory balancing accounts accumulate differences between revenues recognized and authorized revenue requirements until they are collected from customers or are refunded . regulatory balancing accounts include low income programs and purchased power and water accounts . debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues . call premiums on the redemption of long- term debt , as well as unamortized debt expense , are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates . purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the company 2019s california subsidiary during 2002 , and acquisitions in 2007 by the company 2019s new jersey subsidiary . as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 . tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from five to fifteen years , as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service . other regulatory assets include certain deferred business transformation costs , construction costs for treatment facilities , property tax stabilization , employee-related costs , business services project expenses , coastal water project costs , rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others . these costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods . regulatory liabilities the regulatory liabilities generally represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts that are to be credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process . the following table summarizes the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>removal costs recovered through rates</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 301</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefitbalancing accounts</td><td>59</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>32</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total regulatory liabilities</td><td>$ 402</td><td>$ 392</td></tr></table> removal costs recovered through rates are estimated costs to retire assets at the end of their expected useful life that are recovered through customer rates over the life of the associated assets . in december 2008 , the company 2019s subsidiary in new jersey , at the direction of the new jersey puc , began to depreciate $ 48 of the total balance into depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated statements of operations via straight line amortization through november 2048 . pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts represent the difference between costs incurred and costs authorized by the puc 2019s that are expected to be refunded to customers. .\nQuestion: what was the total regulatory liabilities for 2015?\nAnswer: 402.0\nQuestion: and in 2014?\nAnswer: 392.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference between these two values?\nAnswer: 10.0\nQuestion: and what was the value for 2014 again?\nAnswer: 392.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.02551" } ]
CONVFINQA9750	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents the notional amounts for outstanding derivative instruments provide one measure of the transaction volume outstanding and do not represent the amount of the company 2019s exposure to credit or market loss . the credit risk amounts represent the company 2019s gross exposure to potential accounting loss on derivative instruments that are outstanding or unsettled if all counterparties failed to perform according to the terms of the contract , based on then-current currency or interest rates at each respective date . the company 2019s exposure to credit loss and market risk will vary over time as currency and interest rates change . although the table above reflects the notional and credit risk amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments , it does not reflect the gains or losses associated with the exposures and transactions that the instruments are intended to hedge . the amounts ultimately realized upon settlement of these financial instruments , together with the gains and losses on the underlying exposures , will depend on actual market conditions during the remaining life of the instruments . the company generally enters into master netting arrangements , which are designed to reduce credit risk by permitting net settlement of transactions with the same counterparty . to further limit credit risk , the company generally enters into collateral security arrangements that provide for collateral to be received or posted when the net fair value of certain financial instruments fluctuates from contractually established thresholds . the company presents its derivative assets and derivative liabilities at their gross fair values in its consolidated balance sheets . the net cash collateral received by the company related to derivative instruments under its collateral security arrangements was $ 1.0 billion as of september 26 , 2015 and $ 2.1 billion as of september 27 , 2014 . under master netting arrangements with the respective counterparties to the company 2019s derivative contracts , the company is allowed to net settle transactions with a single net amount payable by one party to the other . as of september 26 , 2015 and september 27 , 2014 , the potential effects of these rights of set-off associated with the company 2019s derivative contracts , including the effects of collateral , would be a reduction to both derivative assets and derivative liabilities of $ 2.2 billion and $ 1.6 billion , respectively , resulting in net derivative liabilities of $ 78 million and $ 549 million , respectively . accounts receivable receivables the company has considerable trade receivables outstanding with its third-party cellular network carriers , wholesalers , retailers , value-added resellers , small and mid-sized businesses and education , enterprise and government customers . the company generally does not require collateral from its customers ; however , the company will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk . in addition , when possible , the company attempts to limit credit risk on trade receivables with credit insurance for certain customers or by requiring third-party financing , loans or leases to support credit exposure . these credit-financing arrangements are directly between the third-party financing company and the end customer . as such , the company generally does not assume any recourse or credit risk sharing related to any of these arrangements . as of september 26 , 2015 , the company had one customer that represented 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total trade receivables , which accounted for 12% ( 12 % ) . as of september 27 , 2014 , the company had two customers that represented 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total trade receivables , one of which accounted for 16% ( 16 % ) and the other 13% ( 13 % ) . the company 2019s cellular network carriers accounted for 71% ( 71 % ) and 72% ( 72 % ) of trade receivables as of september 26 , 2015 and september 27 , 2014 , respectively . vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of components to these vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these components directly from suppliers . vendor non-trade receivables from three of the company 2019s vendors accounted for 38% ( 38 % ) , 18% ( 18 % ) and 14% ( 14 % ) of total vendor non-trade receivables as of september 26 , 2015 and three of the company 2019s vendors accounted for 51% ( 51 % ) , 16% ( 16 % ) and 14% ( 14 % ) of total vendor non-trade receivables as of september 27 , 2014 . note 3 2013 consolidated financial statement details the following tables show the company 2019s consolidated financial statement details as of september 26 , 2015 and september 27 , 2014 ( in millions ) : property , plant and equipment , net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>land and buildings</td><td>$ 6956</td><td>$ 4863</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>machinery equipment and internal-use software</td><td>37038</td><td>29639</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>leasehold improvements</td><td>5263</td><td>4513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross property plant and equipment</td><td>49257</td><td>39015</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>-26786 ( 26786 )</td><td>-18391 ( 18391 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total property plant and equipment net</td><td>$ 22471</td><td>$ 20624</td></tr></table> apple inc . \| 2015 form 10-k \| 53 .\nQuestion: what was the change in total property plant and equipment net from 2014 to 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1847.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2477	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . 2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2246.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>180.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>39.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision</td><td>-32.0 ( 32.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>miso deferral</td><td>-32.0 ( 32.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>7.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 2408.8</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 . entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "162.7" } ]
CONVFINQA5184	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\neog utilized average prices per acre from comparable market transactions and estimated discounted cash flows as the basis for determining the fair value of unproved and proved properties , respectively , received in non-cash property exchanges . see note 10 . fair value of debt . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , eog had outstanding $ 6040 million and $ 6390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes , which had estimated fair values of approximately $ 6027 million and $ 6602 million , respectively . the estimated fair value of debt was based upon quoted market prices and , where such prices were not available , other observable ( level 2 ) inputs regarding interest rates available to eog at year-end . 14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2018 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 139 million were written down to their fair value of $ 18 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 121 million . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . impairments in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 173 million , $ 211 million and $ 291 million during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount at beginning of period</td><td>$ 946848</td><td>$ 912926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred</td><td>79057</td><td>54764</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled ( 1 )</td><td>-70829 ( 70829 )</td><td>-61871 ( 61871 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>36622</td><td>34708</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions</td><td>-38932 ( 38932 )</td><td>-9818 ( 9818 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign currency translations</td><td>1611</td><td>16139</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>carrying amount at end of period</td><td>$ 954377</td><td>$ 946848</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>current portion</td><td>$ 26214</td><td>$ 19259</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noncurrent portion</td><td>$ 928163</td><td>$ 927589</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .\nQuestion: how much do the liabilities incurred in 2018 represent in relation to the ones incurred in 2017?\nAnswer: 1.44359\nQuestion: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.44359" } ]
CONVFINQA10153	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 164 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report firm ) is required to hold more than the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) . the tier i common equity standard is effective from the first quarter of 2015 . the following chart presents the basel iii minimum risk-based capital ratios during the transitional periods and on a fully phased-in basis . the chart also includes management 2019s target for the firm 2019s tier 1 common ratio . it is the firm 2019s current expectation that its basel iii tier 1 common ratio will exceed the regulatory minimums , both during the transition period and upon full implementation in 2019 and thereafter . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under the basel iii advanced approach on a fully phased-in basis would be 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 , achieving management 2019s previously stated objectives . the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non-gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under the advanced approach of the basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . key differences in the calculation of rwa between basel i and basel iii advanced approach include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk- weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; and ( 2 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . operational risk capital takes into consideration operational losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized , and the calculation generally incorporates such losses irrespective of whether the issues or business activity giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced . the firm 2019s operational risk capital model continues to be refined in conjunction with the firm 2019s basel iii advanced approach parallel run . as a result of model enhancements in 2013 , as well as taking into consideration the legal expenses incurred by the firm in 2013 , the firm 2019s operational risk capital increased substantially in 2013 over 2012 . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( 201caoci 201d ) related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . december 31 , 2013 ( in millions , except ratios ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tier 1 common under basel i rules</td><td>$ 148887</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add back of basel i deductions ( a )</td><td>1780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deduction for deferred tax asset related to net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards</td><td>-741 ( 741 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>-198 ( 198 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules</td><td>$ 151202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b )</td><td>$ 1590873</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c )</td><td>9.5% ( 9.5 % )</td></tr></table> estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b ) $ 1590873 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c ) 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) ( a ) certain exposures , which are deducted from capital under basel i , are risked-weighted under basel iii. .\nQuestion: what is the value of estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules?\nAnswer: 151202.0\nQuestion: what is the tier 1 common ratio as of 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.094" } ]
CONVFINQA2428	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services . as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds . as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies . we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits . for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year . as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances . table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>client deposits ( 1 )</td><td>$ 195276</td><td>$ 182268</td><td>$ 167470</td><td>$ 143043</td></tr></table> client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively . short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority . as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof . we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration . the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .\nQuestion: what was the value of deposits of clients in 2014?\nAnswer: 195276.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "182268.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7480	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n31mar201122064257 positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which we anticipate could change materially within the next twelve months . liquidity and capital resources . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>fiscal years ended october 1 2010</td><td>fiscal years ended october 2 2009</td><td>fiscal years ended october 3 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period</td><td>$ 364221</td><td>$ 225104</td><td>$ 241577</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>222962</td><td>218805</td><td>182673</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-95329 ( 95329 )</td><td>-49528 ( 49528 )</td><td>-94959 ( 94959 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-38597 ( 38597 )</td><td>-30160 ( 30160 )</td><td>-104187 ( 104187 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cash and cash equivalents at end of period ( 1 )</td><td>$ 453257</td><td>$ 364221</td><td>$ 225104</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include restricted cash balances cash flow from operating activities : cash provided from operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for fiscal year 2010 we generated $ 223.0 million in cash flow from operations , an increase of $ 4.2 million when compared to the $ 218.8 million generated in fiscal year 2009 . during fiscal year 2010 , net income increased by $ 42.3 million to $ 137.3 million when compared to fiscal year 2009 . despite the increase in net income , net cash provided by operating activities remained relatively consistent . this was primarily due to : 2022 fiscal year 2010 net income included a deferred tax expense of $ 38.5 million compared to a $ 24.9 million deferred tax benefit included in 2009 net income due to the release of the tax valuation allowance in fiscal year 2009 . 2022 during fiscal year 2010 , the company invested in working capital as result of higher business activity . compared to fiscal year 2009 , accounts receivable , inventory and accounts payable increased by $ 60.9 million , $ 38.8 million and $ 42.9 million , respectively . cash flow from investing activities : cash flow from investing activities consists primarily of capital expenditures and acquisitions . we had net cash outflows of $ 95.3 million in fiscal year 2010 , compared to $ 49.5 million in fiscal year 2009 . the increase is primarily due to an increase of $ 49.8 million in capital expenditures . we anticipate our capital spending to be consistent in fiscal year 2011 to maintain our projected growth rate . cash flow from financing activities : cash flows from financing activities consist primarily of cash transactions related to debt and equity . during fiscal year 2010 , we had net cash outflows of $ 38.6 million , compared to $ 30.2 million in fiscal year 2009 . during the year we had the following significant transactions : 2022 we retired $ 53.0 million in aggregate principal amount ( carrying value of $ 51.1 million ) of 2007 convertible notes for $ 80.7 million , which included a $ 29.6 million premium paid for the equity component of the instrument . 2022 we received net proceeds from employee stock option exercises of $ 40.5 million in fiscal year 2010 , compared to $ 38.7 million in fiscal year 2009 . skyworks / 2010 annual report 103 .\nQuestion: what was the value of cash outflows in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "95.3" } ]
CONVFINQA10195	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nchanges in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( thous. )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at january 1 2009</td><td>873</td><td>$ 50.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>449</td><td>47.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td><td>43.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>53.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1060</td><td>$ 50.88</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .\nQuestion: what was the amount of nonvested shares as of 12/31/09?\nAnswer: 1060.0\nQuestion: now converted to millions?\nAnswer: 1060000.0\nQuestion: and considering the amount of shares forfeited, in millions?\nAnswer: 22000000.0\nQuestion: so what was the remaining compensation expense per share for unvested awards?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "20.75472" } ]
CONVFINQA6142	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( 1 ) the cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends . ( 2 ) the total return is weighted according to market capitalization of each company at the beginning of each year . ( f ) purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers we have not repurchased any of our common stock since the company filed its initial registration statement on march 16 , ( g ) securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans a description of securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 6 . selected financial data . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td><td>year ended december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td><td>$ 5692</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>290</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>2490</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>110</td><td>248</td><td>211</td><td>-2354 ( 2354 )</td><td>447</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td><td>135</td><td>124</td><td>-2420 ( 2420 )</td><td>276</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6001</td><td>5203</td><td>5036</td><td>4760</td><td>7658</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>3757</td><td>1559</td><td>1645</td><td>1761</td><td>1790</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td><td>364</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .\nQuestion: what was the operating income in 2011?\nAnswer: 110.0\nQuestion: and the goodwill impairment for that year?\nAnswer: 290.0\nQuestion: combined, what is the total amount of these two values?\nAnswer: 400.0\nQuestion: and converted to the millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "400000000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5996	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npurchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>6091605</td><td>$ 158.20</td><td>6087727</td><td>32831024</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>3408467</td><td>147.91</td><td>3402190</td><td>29428834</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>3007951</td><td>148.40</td><td>3000715</td><td>26428119</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>12508023</td><td>$ 153.04</td><td>12490632</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .\nQuestion: what was the number of shares repurchased in the last quarter of 2018?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12508023.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7645	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( 2 ) for purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges , earnings consist of earnings before income taxes minus income from equity investees plus fixed charges . fixed charges consist of interest expense and the portion of rental expense we believe is representative of the interest component of rental expense . ( a ) for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , earnings available for fixed charges were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $ 37.0 million and $ 461.2 million , respectively . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income ( loss ) before interest expense , income tax expense ( benefit ) , depreciation , and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , is calculated by adjusting ebitda for certain items of income and expense including ( but not limited to ) the following : ( a ) non-cash equity-based compensation ; ( b ) goodwill impairment charges ; ( c ) sponsor fees ; ( d ) certain consulting fees ; ( e ) debt-related legal and accounting costs ; ( f ) equity investment income and losses ; ( g ) certain severance and retention costs ; ( h ) gains and losses from the early extinguishment of debt ; ( i ) gains and losses from asset dispositions outside the ordinary course of business ; and ( j ) non-recurring , extraordinary or unusual gains or losses or expenses . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by the company may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda also provides helpful information as it is the primary measure used in certain financial covenants contained in our credit agreements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income ( loss ) to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td><td>$ -29.2 ( 29.2 )</td><td>$ -373.4 ( 373.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>208.2</td><td>210.2</td><td>204.9</td><td>209.4</td><td>218.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax expense ( benefit )</td><td>62.7</td><td>67.1</td><td>11.2</td><td>-7.8 ( 7.8 )</td><td>-87.8 ( 87.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>250.1</td><td>307.4</td><td>324.2</td><td>391.9</td><td>431.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ebitda</td><td>653.8</td><td>703.7</td><td>557.4</td><td>564.3</td><td>188.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td><td>11.5</td><td>15.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>sponsor fees</td><td>2.5</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>consulting and debt-related professional fees</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.1</td><td>15.1</td><td>14.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>241.8</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net loss ( gain ) on extinguishments of long-term debt</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>litigation net ( i )</td><td>-4.1 ( 4.1 )</td><td>4.3</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses</td><td>75.0</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other adjustments ( ii )</td><td>8.6</td><td>13.7</td><td>11.4</td><td>7.9</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>adjusted ebitda</td><td>$ 808.5</td><td>$ 766.6</td><td>$ 717.3</td><td>$ 601.8</td><td>$ 465.4</td></tr></table> ( i ) relates to unusual , non-recurring litigation matters . ( ii ) includes certain retention costs and equity investment income , certain severance costs in 2009 and a gain related to the sale of the informacast software and equipment in 2009. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2003, what was the total of the net income and the income tax expense, combined?\nAnswer: 195.5\nQuestion: and how much did the income tax expense represent in relation to this total?\nAnswer: 0.32072\nQuestion: and in the previous year, what was that combined total, considering the same segments?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "186.1" } ]
CONVFINQA3522	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .\nQuestion: what was the fluctuation of the value of the cadence design system from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: -7.22\nQuestion: and what was that fluctuation as a portion of the value of that stock in 2006?\nAnswer: -0.0491\nQuestion: in that same period, what was that fluctuation for the s&p500?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9.53" } ]
CONVFINQA744	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20ac650 million revolving credit facility 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 2009</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 2009</td><td>24</td><td>158</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 24</td><td>$ 268</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 .\nQuestion: what was the total of interest payments in 2009?\nAnswer: 201.0\nQuestion: an what was it in 2008?\nAnswer: 228.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the variation over the year?\nAnswer: -27.0\nQuestion: and concerning these same payments, what was the ratio of the 2010 ones to the 2009 ones?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.9403" } ]
CONVFINQA10784	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .\nQuestion: what was the number of global cruise guests in 2011?\nAnswer: 20227000.0\nQuestion: and in 2007?\nAnswer: 16586000.0\nQuestion: so by how much did this value change between these years?\nAnswer: 3641000.0\nQuestion: and the value for 2007 again?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "16586000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1269	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbusiness-related metrics as of or for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loan and lease receivables</td><td>$ 43.2</td><td>$ 37.4</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average loan and lease receivables</td><td>41.7</td><td>31.7</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automobile origination volume</td><td>27.8</td><td>25.3</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>automobile market share</td><td>6.1% ( 6.1 % )</td><td>5.7% ( 5.7 % )</td><td>40bp</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>30+ day delinquency rate</td><td>1.46</td><td>1.54</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net charge-off ratio</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.51</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>overhead ratio</td><td>35</td><td>36</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td></tr></table> crb is the no . 1 bank in the new york tri-state area and a top five bank in texas ( both ranked by retail deposits ) , providing payment , liquidity , investment , insurance and credit products and services to three primary customer segments : small busi- ness , affluent and retail . within these segments , crb serves 326000 small businesses , 433000 affluent consumers and 2.6 million mass-market consumers . crb 2019s continued focus on expanding customer relationships resulted in a 14% ( 14 % ) increase in core deposits ( for this purpose , core deposits are total deposits less time deposits ) from december 31 , 2002 , and a 77% ( 77 % ) increase in the cross-sell of chase credit products over 2002 . in 2003 , mortgage and home equity originations through crb 2019s distribution channels were $ 3.4 billion and $ 4.7 billion , respectively . branch-originated credit cards totaled 77000 , contributing to 23% ( 23 % ) of crb customers holding chase credit cards . crb is compensated by cfs 2019s credit businesses for the home finance and credit card loans it origi- nates and does not retain these balances . chase regional banking while crb continues to position itself for growth , decreased deposit spreads related to the low-rate environment and increased credit costs resulted in an 80% ( 80 % ) decline in crb operating earnings from 2002 . this decrease was partly offset by an 8% ( 8 % ) increase in total average deposits . operating revenue of $ 2.6 billion decreased by 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2002 . net interest income declined by 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 1.7 billion , primarily attributable to the lower interest rate environment . noninterest revenue decreased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 927 million due to lower deposit service fees , decreased debit card fees and one-time gains in 2002 . crb 2019s revenue does not include funding profits earned on its deposit base ; these amounts are included in the results of global treasury . operating expense of $ 2.4 billion increased by 7% ( 7 % ) from 2002 . the increase was primarily due to investments in technology within the branch network ; also contributing were higher compensation expenses related to increased staff levels and higher severance costs as a result of continued restructuring . this increase in operating caf is the largest u.s . bank originator of automobile loans and leases , with more than 2.9 million accounts . in 2003 , caf had a record number of automobile loan and lease originations , growing by 10% ( 10 % ) over 2002 to $ 27.8 billion . loan and lease receivables of $ 43.2 billion at december 31 , 2003 , were 16% ( 16 % ) higher than at the prior year-end . despite a challenging operating environment reflecting slightly declining new car sales in 2003 and increased competition , caf 2019s market share among automobile finance companies improved to 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) in 2003 from 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2002 . the increase in market share was the result of strong organic growth and an origination strategy that allies the business with manufac- turers and dealers . caf 2019s relationships with several major car manufacturers contributed to 2003 growth , as did caf 2019s dealer relationships , which increased from approximately 12700 dealers in 2002 to approximately 13700 dealers in 2003 . in 2003 , operating earnings were $ 205 million , 23% ( 23 % ) higher compared with 2002 . the increase in earnings was driven by continued revenue growth and improved operating efficiency . in 2003 , caf 2019s operating revenue grew by 23% ( 23 % ) to $ 842 million . net interest income grew by 33% ( 33 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase was driven by strong operating performance due to higher average loans and leases outstanding , reflecting continued strong origination volume and lower funding costs . operating expense of $ 292 million increased by 18% ( 18 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase in expenses was driven by higher average chase auto finance loans outstanding , higher origination volume and higher perform- ance-based incentives . caf 2019s overhead ratio improved from 36% ( 36 % ) in 2002 to 35% ( 35 % ) in 2003 , as a result of strong revenue growth , con- tinued productivity gains and disciplined expense management . credit costs increased 18% ( 18 % ) to $ 205 million , primarily reflecting a 32% ( 32 % ) increase in average loan and lease receivables . credit quality continued to be strong relative to 2002 , as evidenced by a lower net charge-off ratio and 30+ day delinquency rate . caf also comprises chase education finance , a top provider of government-guaranteed and private loans for higher education . loans are provided through a joint venture with sallie mae , a government-sponsored enterprise and the leader in funding and servicing education loans . chase education finance 2019s origination volume totaled $ 2.7 billion , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) from last year . management 2019s discussion and analysis j.p . morgan chase & co . 42 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report .\nQuestion: what was the percentage growth of the operating earnings from 2002 to 2003?\nAnswer: 0.23\nQuestion: and what percentage did the 2002 earnings represent in relation to the 2003 ones?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "99.77" } ]
CONVFINQA7102	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nabiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation ( continued ) restricted stock and restricted stock units the following table summarizes restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2012 : number of shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at beginning of year</td><td>407</td><td>$ 9.84</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>607</td><td>18.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>10.88</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>13.72</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at end of year</td><td>871</td><td>$ 15.76</td></tr></table> the remaining unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units , including performance-based awards , as of march 31 , 2012 was $ 7.1 million and the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.2 years . the weighted average grant-date fair value for restricted stock and restricted stock units granted during the years ended march 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 18.13 , $ 10.00 and $ 7.67 per share , respectively . the total fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units vested in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 1.5 million , $ 1.0 million and $ 0.4 million , respectively . performance-based awards included in the restricted stock and restricted stock units activity discussed above are certain awards granted in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 and 2010 that vest subject to certain performance-based criteria . in june 2010 , 311000 shares of restricted stock and a performance-based award for the potential issuance of 45000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of senior management of the company , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and performance milestones by the company . during the year ended march 31 , 2011 , the company determined that it met the prescribed performance targets and a portion of these shares and stock options vested . the remaining shares will vest upon satisfaction of prescribed service conditions by the award recipients . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , the company determined that it should have been using the graded vesting method instead of the straight-line method to expense stock-based compensation for the performance-based awards issued in june 2010 . this resulted in additional stock based compensation expense of approximately $ 0.6 million being recorded during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 that should have been recorded during the year ended march 31 , 2011 . the company believes that the amount is not material to its march 31 , 2011 consolidated financial statements and therefore recorded the adjustment in the quarter ended june 30 , 2011 . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , performance-based awards of restricted stock units for the potential issuance of 284000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of the senior management , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and revenue performance milestones by the company . as of march 31 , 2012 , the company determined that it met the prescribed targets for 184000 shares underlying these awards and it believes it is probable that the prescribed performance targets will be met for the remaining 100000 shares , and the compensation expense is being recognized accordingly . during the year ended march 31 , 2012 , the company has recorded $ 3.3 million in stock-based compensation expense for equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones have been achieved or are probable of being achieved . the remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these equity awards at march 31 , 2012 is $ 3.6 million based on the company 2019s current assessment of probability of achieving the performance milestones . the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.1 years. .\nQuestion: what was the total value of the granted shares in 2012, in thousands of dollars?\nAnswer: 11004.91\nQuestion: and how much is that in dollars?\nAnswer: 11004910.0\nQuestion: in that same year, what was the amount of the equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones were achieved, also in dollars?\nAnswer: 3300000.0\nQuestion: which one, then, is greater: the value of these equity awards or of those granted shares?\nAnswer: yes\nQuestion: still in 2012, what was the full amount of equity awards where the performance criteria has been met, in dollars?\nAnswer: 3600000.0\nQuestion: and what is the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized, in years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.1" } ]
CONVFINQA7487	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2013 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company index</td><td>november 17 2011</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>december 31 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>delphi automotive plc ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.98</td><td>$ 179.33</td><td>$ 285.81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 ( 2 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.80</td><td>116.93</td><td>154.80</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>89.27</td><td>110.41</td><td>166.46</td></tr></table> dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares . the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 . in addition , in january 2014 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2014 . in october 2011 , the board of managers of delphi automotive llp approved a distribution of approximately $ 95 million , which was paid on december 5 , 2011 , principally in respect of taxes , to members of delphi automotive llp who held membership interests as of the close of business on october 31 , 2011. .\nQuestion: what was the regular quarterly cash dividend per ordinary share declared by the board of directors and payable on february 27 , 2014?\nAnswer: 0.25\nQuestion: and what was that regular quarterly cash dividend payable in each quarter of 2013?\nAnswer: 0.17\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in this regular quarterly cash dividend from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: 0.08\nQuestion: and what becomes this change when considering the entire year, or four quarters?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.32" } ]
CONVFINQA3230	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the \"2010 credit agreement\" ) which was subsequently terminated in july 2012 . the 2010 credit agreement provided for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into the 2010 credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the 2010 credit agreement was set to terminate on august 5 , 2013 . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 705 million of which $ 34 million was used as of december 31 , 2012 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 2.27% ( 2.27 % ) as of dec . 31 2012 and 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of december 31 2011</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2012 , total indebtedness was 42% ( 42 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 219 million , $ 212 million and $ 189 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . rental expense for operating leases was $ 233 million , $ 249 million and $ 233 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , are ( in millions ) $ 171 in 2013 , $ 135 in 2014 , $ 107 in 2015 , $ 83 in 2016 , $ 64 in 2017 and $ 135 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds of $ 119 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , guarantees outstanding were $ 96 million and $ 90 million , respectively . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 11 million and $ 13 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 11 million and $ 21 million , as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the fair value of each guarantee was estimated by comparing the net present value of two hypothetical cash flow streams , one based on ppg 2019s incremental borrowing rate and the other based on the borrower 2019s incremental borrowing rate , as of the effective date of the guarantee . both streams were discounted at a risk free rate of return . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit , surety bonds or guarantees is likely . 9 . fair value measurement the accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a hierarchy with three levels of inputs used to determine fair value . level 1 inputs are quoted prices ( unadjusted ) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities , are considered to be the most reliable evidence of fair value , and should be used whenever available . level 2 inputs are observable prices that are not quoted on active exchanges . level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs employed for measuring the fair value of assets or liabilities . table of contents notes to the consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2012, what was the remaining amount the company had in its restrictive covenant regarding debt to total capitalization?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.18" } ]
CONVFINQA10070	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2006</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 32.68</td><td>$ 26.66</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>35.75</td><td>27.35</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>36.92</td><td>29.98</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>38.74</td><td>35.21</td></tr></table> on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended 12/31/07 and the closing price on 2/29/08?\nAnswer: -8.09\nQuestion: and the growth rate during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.17387" } ]
CONVFINQA2870	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncorporate/other corporate/other includes global staff functions ( includes finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) and other corporate expense , global operations and technology ( o&t ) , residual corporate treasury and corporate items . at december 31 , 2009 , this segment had approximately $ 230 billion of assets , consisting primarily of the company 2019s liquidity portfolio , including $ 110 billion of cash and cash equivalents. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ -1663 ( 1663 )</td><td>$ -2680 ( 2680 )</td><td>$ -2008 ( 2008 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>-8893 ( 8893 )</td><td>422</td><td>-302 ( 302 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ -10556 ( 10556 )</td><td>$ -2258 ( 2258 )</td><td>$ -2310 ( 2310 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 1420</td><td>$ 510</td><td>$ 1813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ -11975 ( 11975 )</td><td>$ -2769 ( 2769 )</td><td>$ -4120 ( 4120 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income taxes ( benefits )</td><td>-4369 ( 4369 )</td><td>-587 ( 587 )</td><td>-1446 ( 1446 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ -7606 ( 7606 )</td><td>$ -2182 ( 2182 )</td><td>$ -2674 ( 2674 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes</td><td>-445 ( 445 )</td><td>4002</td><td>708</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ -8051 ( 8051 )</td><td>$ 1820</td><td>$ -1966 ( 1966 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>net income attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ -8051 ( 8051 )</td><td>$ 1820</td><td>$ -1968 ( 1968 )</td></tr></table> 2009 vs . 2008 revenues , net of interest expense declined , primarily due to the pretax loss on debt extinguishment related to the repayment of the $ 20 billion of tarp trust preferred securities and the pretax loss in connection with the exit from the loss-sharing agreement with the u.s . government . revenues also declined , due to the absence of the 2008 sale of citigroup global services limited recorded in o&t . this was partially offset by a pretax gain related to the exchange offers , revenues and higher intersegment eliminations . operating expenses increased , primarily due to intersegment eliminations and increases in compensation , partially offset by lower repositioning reserves . 2008 vs . 2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities . operating expenses declined , primarily due to lower restructuring charges in 2008 as well as reductions in incentive compensation and benefits expense. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in total operating expenses between 2008 and 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "910.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3235	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 32.41 billion and $ 31.94 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 300 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2012 and december 2011 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of commercial mortgage loans . contingent and forward starting resale and securities borrowing agreements/forward starting repurchase and secured lending agreements the firm enters into resale and securities borrowing agreements and repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . investment commitments the firm 2019s investment commitments consist of commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . these commitments include $ 872 million and $ 1.62 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to real estate private investments and $ 6.47 billion and $ 7.50 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to corporate and other private investments . of these amounts , $ 6.21 billion and $ 8.38 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , relate to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm , which will be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements , principally for office space , expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . in millions december 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 439</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>407</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>345</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>317</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>306</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 - thereafter</td><td>1375</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3189</td></tr></table> rent charged to operating expense for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 was $ 374 million , $ 475 million and $ 508 million , respectively . operating leases include office space held in excess of current requirements . rent expense relating to space held for growth is included in 201coccupancy . 201d the firm records a liability , based on the fair value of the remaining lease rentals reduced by any potential or existing sublease rentals , for leases where the firm has ceased using the space and management has concluded that the firm will not derive any future economic benefits . costs to terminate a lease before the end of its term are recognized and measured at fair value on termination . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 175 .\nQuestion: what was the total amount of commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm , which will be funded at market value on the date of investment in the years of 2011 and 2012, combined, in billions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "14.59" } ]
CONVFINQA10428	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .\nQuestion: what was the 2004 net revenue?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "239.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4599	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthird-party sales for the engineered products and solutions segment improved 7% ( 7 % ) in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily attributable to higher third-party sales of the two acquired businesses ( $ 457 ) , primarily related to the aerospace end market , and increased demand from the industrial gas turbine end market , partially offset by lower volumes in the oil and gas end market and commercial transportation end market as well as pricing pressures in aerospace . third-party sales for this segment improved 27% ( 27 % ) in 2015 compared with 2014 , largely attributable to the third-party sales ( $ 1310 ) of the three acquired businesses ( see above ) , and higher volumes in this segment 2019s legacy businesses , both of which were primarily related to the aerospace end market . these positive impacts were slightly offset by unfavorable foreign currency movements , principally driven by a weaker euro . atoi for the engineered products and solutions segment increased $ 47 , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily related to net productivity improvements across all businesses as well as the volume increase from both the rti acquisition and organic revenue growth , partially offset by a lower margin product mix and pricing pressures in the aerospace end market . atoi for this segment increased $ 16 , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2015 compared with 2014 , principally the result of net productivity improvements across most businesses , a positive contribution from acquisitions , and overall higher volumes in this segment 2019s legacy businesses . these positive impacts were partially offset by unfavorable price and product mix , higher costs related to growth projects , and net unfavorable foreign currency movements , primarily related to a weaker euro . in 2017 , demand in the commercial aerospace end market is expected to remain strong , driven by the ramp up of new aerospace engine platforms , somewhat offset by continued customer destocking and engine ramp-up challenges . demand in the defense end market is expected to grow due to the continuing ramp-up of certain aerospace programs . additionally , net productivity improvements are anticipated while pricing pressure across all markets is likely to continue . transportation and construction solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 1802</td><td>$ 1882</td><td>$ 2021</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 176</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 180</td></tr></table> the transportation and construction solutions segment produces products that are used mostly in the nonresidential building and construction and commercial transportation end markets . such products include integrated aluminum structural systems , architectural extrusions , and forged aluminum commercial vehicle wheels , which are sold both directly to customers and through distributors . a small part of this segment also produces aluminum products for the industrial products end market . generally , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are primarily the u.s . dollar , the euro , and the brazilian real . third-party sales for the transportation and construction solutions segment decreased 4% ( 4 % ) in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily driven by lower demand from the north american commercial transportation end market , which was partially offset by rising demand from the building and construction end market . third-party sales for this segment decreased 7% ( 7 % ) in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily driven by unfavorable foreign currency movements , principally caused by a weaker euro and brazilian real , and lower volume related to the building and construction end market , somewhat offset by higher volume related to the commercial transportation end market . atoi for the transportation and construction solutions segment increased $ 10 , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2016 compared with 2015 , principally driven by net productivity improvements across all businesses and growth in the building and construction segment , partially offset by lower demand in the north american heavy duty truck and brazilian markets. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in third-party sales for engineered product between 2015 and 2016?\nAnswer: -80.0\nQuestion: and as a percentage of the original value?\nAnswer: -0.04251\nQuestion: and by how much did the third-party sales for the transportation segment decrease in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.07" } ]
CONVFINQA4131	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock are listed and traded on the nasdaq global select market ( 201cnasdaq 201d ) under the symbols 201cdisca , 201d 201cdiscb 201d and 201cdisck , 201d respectively . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the range of high and low sales prices per share of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as reported on yahoo! finance ( finance.yahoo.com ) . series a common stock series b common stock series c common stock high low high low high low fourth quarter $ 23.73 $ 16.28 $ 26.80 $ 20.00 $ 22.47 $ 15.27 third quarter $ 27.18 $ 20.80 $ 27.90 $ 22.00 $ 26.21 $ 19.62 second quarter $ 29.40 $ 25.11 $ 29.55 $ 25.45 $ 28.90 $ 24.39 first quarter $ 29.62 $ 26.34 $ 29.65 $ 27.55 $ 28.87 $ 25.76 fourth quarter $ 29.55 $ 25.01 $ 30.50 $ 26.00 $ 28.66 $ 24.20 third quarter $ 26.97 $ 24.27 $ 28.00 $ 25.21 $ 26.31 $ 23.44 second quarter $ 29.31 $ 23.73 $ 29.34 $ 24.15 $ 28.48 $ 22.54 first quarter $ 29.42 $ 24.33 $ 29.34 $ 24.30 $ 28.00 $ 23.81 as of february 21 , 2018 , there were approximately 1308 , 75 and 1414 record holders of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , respectively . these amounts do not include the number of shareholders whose shares are held of record by banks , brokerage houses or other institutions , but include each such institution as one shareholder . we have not paid any cash dividends on our series a common stock , series b common stock or series c common stock , and we have no present intention to do so . payment of cash dividends , if any , will be determined by our board of directors after consideration of our earnings , financial condition and other relevant factors such as our credit facility's restrictions on our ability to declare dividends in certain situations . purchases of equity securities the following table presents information about our repurchases of common stock that were made through open market transactions during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 ( in millions , except per share amounts ) . period total number of series c shares purchased average paid per share : series c ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( b ) ( c ) approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( a ) ( b ) october 1 , 2017 - october 31 , 2017 2014 $ 2014 2014 $ 2014 november 1 , 2017 - november 30 , 2017 2014 $ 2014 2014 $ 2014 december 1 , 2017 - december 31 , 2017 2014 $ 2014 2014 $ 2014 total 2014 2014 $ 2014 ( a ) the amounts do not give effect to any fees , commissions or other costs associated with repurchases of shares . ( b ) under the stock repurchase program , management was authorized to purchase shares of the company's common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices or pursuant to one or more accelerated stock repurchase agreements or other derivative arrangements as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . the company's authorization under the program expired on october 8 , 2017 and we have not repurchased any shares of common stock since then . we historically have funded and in the future may fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations and the issuance of debt . in the future , if further authorization is provided , we may also choose to fund stock repurchases through borrowings under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during 2017 and no repurchases of series c common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . ( c ) we entered into an agreement with advance/newhouse to repurchase , on a quarterly basis , a number of shares of series c-1 convertible preferred stock convertible into a number of shares of series c common stock . we did not convert any any shares of series c-1 convertible preferred stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 . there are no planned repurchases of series c-1 convertible preferred stock for the first quarter of 2018 as there were no repurchases of series a or series c common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2012 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 and 2017 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td><td>december 312014</td><td>december 312015</td><td>december 312016</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 139.42</td><td>$ 106.23</td><td>$ 82.27</td><td>$ 84.53</td><td>$ 69.01</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 144.61</td><td>$ 116.45</td><td>$ 85.03</td><td>$ 91.70</td><td>$ 78.01</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 143.35</td><td>$ 115.28</td><td>$ 86.22</td><td>$ 91.56</td><td>$ 72.38</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 129.60</td><td>$ 144.36</td><td>$ 143.31</td><td>$ 156.98</td><td>$ 187.47</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 163.16</td><td>$ 186.87</td><td>$ 180.10</td><td>$ 200.65</td><td>$ 208.79</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total number of shareholders for the series a and b of common stock, combined?\nAnswer: 1383.0\nQuestion: including the series c common stock, what then becomes that total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2797.0" } ]
CONVFINQA666	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nf-80 www.thehartford.com the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 14 . commitments and contingencies ( continued ) future minimum lease commitments as of december 31 , 2016 operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 42</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments [1]</td><td>$ 163</td></tr></table> [1] excludes expected future minimum sublease income of approximately $ 2 , $ 2 , $ 2 , $ 2 , $ 0 and $ 0 in 2017 , 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , 2021 and thereafter respectively . the company 2019s lease commitments consist primarily of lease agreements for office space , automobiles , and office equipment that expire at various dates . unfunded commitments as of december 31 , 2016 , the company has outstanding commitments totaling $ 1.6 billion , of which $ 1.2 billion is committed to fund limited partnership and other alternative investments , which may be called by the partnership during the commitment period to fund the purchase of new investments and partnership expenses . additionally , $ 313 of the outstanding commitments relate to various funding obligations associated with private placement securities . the remaining outstanding commitments of $ 95 relate to mortgage loans the company is expecting to fund in the first half of 2017 . guaranty funds and other insurance-related assessments in all states , insurers licensed to transact certain classes of insurance are required to become members of a guaranty fund . in most states , in the event of the insolvency of an insurer writing any such class of insurance in the state , the guaranty funds may assess its members to pay covered claims of the insolvent insurers . assessments are based on each member 2019s proportionate share of written premiums in the state for the classes of insurance in which the insolvent insurer was engaged . assessments are generally limited for any year to one or two percent of the premiums written per year depending on the state . some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through surcharges on policyholders or through full or partial premium tax offsets , while other states permit recovery of assessments through the rate filing process . liabilities for guaranty fund and other insurance-related assessments are accrued when an assessment is probable , when it can be reasonably estimated , and when the event obligating the company to pay an imposed or probable assessment has occurred . liabilities for guaranty funds and other insurance- related assessments are not discounted and are included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 the liability balance was $ 134 and $ 138 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 amounts related to premium tax offsets of $ 34 and $ 44 , respectively , were included in other assets . derivative commitments certain of the company 2019s derivative agreements contain provisions that are tied to the financial strength ratings , as set by nationally recognized statistical agencies , of the individual legal entity that entered into the derivative agreement . if the legal entity 2019s financial strength were to fall below certain ratings , the counterparties to the derivative agreements could demand immediate and ongoing full collateralization and in certain instances enable the counterparties to terminate the agreements and demand immediate settlement of all outstanding derivative positions traded under each impacted bilateral agreement . the settlement amount is determined by netting the derivative positions transacted under each agreement . if the termination rights were to be exercised by the counterparties , it could impact the legal entity 2019s ability to conduct hedging activities by increasing the associated costs and decreasing the willingness of counterparties to transact with the legal entity . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position as of december 31 , 2016 was $ 1.4 billion . of this $ 1.4 billion , the legal entities have posted collateral of $ 1.7 billion in the normal course of business . in addition , the company has posted collateral of $ 31 associated with a customized gmwb derivative . based on derivative market values as of december 31 , 2016 , a downgrade of one level below the current financial strength ratings by either moody 2019s or s&p would not require additional assets to be posted as collateral . based on derivative market values as of december 31 , 2016 , a downgrade of two levels below the current financial strength ratings by either moody 2019s or s&p would require additional $ 10 of assets to be posted as collateral . these collateral amounts could change as derivative market values change , as a result of changes in our hedging activities or to the extent changes in contractual terms are negotiated . the nature of the collateral that we post , when required , is primarily in the form of u.s . treasury bills , u.s . treasury notes and government agency securities . guarantees in the ordinary course of selling businesses or entities to third parties , the company has agreed to indemnify purchasers for losses arising subsequent to the closing due to breaches of representations and warranties with respect to the business or entity being sold or with respect to covenants and obligations of the company and/or its subsidiaries . these obligations are typically subject to various time limitations , defined by the contract or by operation of law , such as statutes of limitation . in some cases , the maximum potential obligation is subject to contractual limitations , while in other cases such limitations are not specified or applicable . the company does not expect to make any payments on these guarantees and is not carrying any liabilities associated with these guarantees. .\nQuestion: in 2017, what was the net operating lease obligation excluding the expected future minimum sublease income?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "42.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9522	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nprovision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits</td><td>18</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in permanent reinvestment assertion</td><td>2014</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjustments to valuation allowances</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tax law changes</td><td>2014</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>effective income tax rate on continuing operations</td><td>74% ( 74 % )</td><td>61% ( 61 % )</td></tr></table> the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income . the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments . the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the \"corporate and other unallocated items\" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below . effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent . change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s . tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations . offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million . in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s . tax on previously undistributed earnings . adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s . benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes . discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .\nQuestion: what is the effective income tax rate on continuing operations in 2012?\nAnswer: 74.0\nQuestion: what about in 2011?\nAnswer: 61.0\nQuestion: what is the sum for these two years?\nAnswer: 135.0\nQuestion: what about the average?\nAnswer: 67.5\nQuestion: what is the amount adjustments to valuation allowances in 2012?\nAnswer: 21.0\nQuestion: what about in 2011?\nAnswer: 14.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 7.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.5" } ]
CONVFINQA9796	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii , item 8 fourth quarter of 2007 : 0160 schlumberger sold certain workover rigs for $ 32 million , resulting in a pretax gain of $ 24 million ( $ 17 million after-tax ) which is classified in interest and other income , net in the consolidated statement of income . 4 . acquisitions acquisition of eastern echo holding plc on december 10 , 2007 , schlumberger completed the acquisition of eastern echo holding plc ( 201ceastern echo 201d ) for $ 838 million in cash . eastern echo was a dubai-based marine seismic company that did not have any operations at the time of acquisition , but had signed contracts for the construction of six seismic vessels . the purchase price has been allocated to the net assets acquired based upon their estimated fair values as follows : ( stated in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash and short-term investments</td><td>$ 266</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other current assets</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fixed income investments held to maturity</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vessels under construction</td><td>694</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accounts payable and accrued liabilities</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>-182 ( 182 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 838</td></tr></table> other acquisitions schlumberger has made other acquisitions and minority interest investments , none of which were significant on an individual basis , for cash payments , net of cash acquired , of $ 514 million during 2009 , $ 345 million during 2008 , and $ 281 million during 2007 . pro forma results pertaining to the above acquisitions are not presented as the impact was not significant . 5 . drilling fluids joint venture the mi-swaco drilling fluids joint venture is owned 40% ( 40 % ) by schlumberger and 60% ( 60 % ) by smith international , inc . schlumberger records income relating to this venture using the equity method of accounting . the carrying value of schlumberger 2019s investment in the joint venture on december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.3 billion , respectively , and is included within investments in affiliated companies on the consolidated balance sheet . schlumberger 2019s equity income from this joint venture was $ 131 million in 2009 , $ 210 million in 2008 and $ 178 million in 2007 . schlumberger received cash distributions from the joint venture of $ 106 million in 2009 , $ 57 million in 2008 and $ 46 million in 2007 . the joint venture agreement contains a provision under which either party to the joint venture may offer to sell its entire interest in the venture to the other party at a cash purchase price per percentage interest specified in an offer notice . if the offer to sell is not accepted , the offering party will be obligated to purchase the entire interest of the other party at the same price per percentage interest as the prices specified in the offer notice. .\nQuestion: what percentage did the cash and short-term investments represent in relation to the total purchase price?\nAnswer: 0.31742\nQuestion: and what was the total debt?\nAnswer: 199.0\nQuestion: what was the total asset value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1037.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10354	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndevon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values in the tables above . fixed-income securities 2014 devon 2019s fixed-income securities consist of u.s . treasury obligations , bonds issued by investment-grade companies from diverse industries , and asset-backed securities . these fixed-income securities are actively traded securities that can be redeemed upon demand . the fair values of these level 1 securities are based upon quoted market prices . devon 2019s fixed income securities also include commingled funds that primarily invest in long-term bonds and u.s . treasury securities . these fixed income securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . equity securities 2014 devon 2019s equity securities include a commingled global equity fund that invests in large , mid and small capitalization stocks across the world 2019s developed and emerging markets . these equity securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . at december 31 , 2010 , devon 2019s equity securities consisted of investments in u.s . large and small capitalization companies and international large capitalization companies . these equity securities were actively traded securities that could be redeemed upon demand . the fair values of these level 1 securities are based upon quoted market prices . at december 31 , 2010 , devon 2019s equity securities also included a commingled fund that invested in large capitalization companies . these equity securities could be redeemed on demand but were not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . other securities 2014 devon 2019s other securities include commingled , short-term investment funds . these securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by investment managers . devon 2019s hedge fund and alternative investments include an investment in an actively traded global mutual fund that focuses on alternative investment strategies and a hedge fund of funds that invests both long and short using a variety of investment strategies . devon 2019s hedge fund of funds is not actively traded and devon is subject to redemption restrictions with regards to this investment . the fair value of this level 3 investment represents the fair value as determined by the hedge fund manager . included below is a summary of the changes in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets ( in millions ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchases</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment returns</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchases</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>investment returns</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>$ 90</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net value change in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets from 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: 7.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2009?\nAnswer: 51.0\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.13725" } ]
CONVFINQA131	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof . we have , as discussed previously , issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to the shelf registration . the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors . additional information about debt and equity securities issued pursuant to this shelf registration is provided in notes 9 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . we currently maintain a corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3 billion with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issue . at december 31 , 2011 , we had $ 2.38 billion of commercial paper outstanding , compared to $ 2.80 billion at december 31 , 2010 . additional information about our corporate commercial paper program is provided in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . state street bank had initial board authority to issue bank notes up to an aggregate of $ 5 billion , including up to $ 1 billion of subordinated bank notes . approximately $ 2.05 billion was available under this board authority as of december 31 , 2011 . in 2011 , $ 2.45 billion of senior notes , which were outstanding at december 31 , 2010 , matured . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 787 million as of december 31 , 2011 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2011 , no balance was outstanding on this line of credit . contractual cash obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31 2011 ( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period less than 1 year</td><td>payments due by period 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period 4-5 years</td><td>payments due by period over 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>$ 9276</td><td>$ 1973</td><td>$ 1169</td><td>$ 1944</td><td>$ 4190</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating leases</td><td>1129</td><td>237</td><td>389</td><td>228</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>989</td><td>68</td><td>136</td><td>138</td><td>647</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual cash obligations</td><td>$ 11394</td><td>$ 2278</td><td>$ 1694</td><td>$ 2310</td><td>$ 5112</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) long-term debt excludes capital lease obligations ( presented as a separate line item ) and the effect of interest-rate swaps . interest payments were calculated at the stated rate with the exception of floating-rate debt , for which payments were calculated using the indexed rate in effect as of december 31 , 2011 . the obligations presented in the table above are recorded in our consolidated statement of condition at december 31 , 2011 , except for interest on long-term debt and capital lease obligations . the table does not include obligations which will be settled in cash , primarily in less than one year , such as deposits , federal funds purchased , securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings . additional information about deposits , federal funds purchased , securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings is provided in notes 7 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the table does not include obligations related to derivative instruments , because the amounts included in our consolidated statement of condition at december 31 , 2011 related to derivatives do not represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid under the contracts upon settlement . additional information about derivative contracts is provided in note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . we have obligations under pension and other post-retirement benefit plans , more fully described in note 18 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 , which are not included in the above table . additional information about contractual cash obligations related to long-term debt and operating and capital leases is provided in notes 9 and 19 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the consolidated statement of cash flows , also included under item 8 , provides additional liquidity information. .\nQuestion: what was the value of commercial paper outstanding in 2011?\nAnswer: 2.8\nQuestion: what was the value in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.38" } ]
CONVFINQA1430	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2014 , the company closed on thirteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate purchase price of $ 9 . assets acquired , principally plant , totaled $ 17 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 8 , including $ 5 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 2 . during 2013 , the company closed on fifteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate net purchase price of $ 24 . assets acquired , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 67 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 43 , including $ 26 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 13 . included in these totals was the company 2019s november 14 , 2013 acquisition of all of the capital stock of dale service corporation ( 201cdale 201d ) , a regulated wastewater utility company , for a total cash purchase price of $ 5 ( net of cash acquired of $ 7 ) , plus assumed liabilities . the dale acquisition was accounted for as a business combination ; accordingly , operating results from november 14 , 2013 were included in the company 2019s results of operations . the purchase price was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets based upon their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company 2019s regulatory practice was followed whereby property , plant and equipment ( rate base ) was considered fair value for business combination purposes . similarly , regulatory assets and liabilities acquired were recorded at book value and are subject to regulatory approval where applicable . the acquired debt was valued in a manner consistent with the company 2019s level 3 debt . see note 17 2014fair value of financial instruments . non-cash assets acquired in the dale acquisition , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 41 ; liabilities assumed totaled $ 36 , including debt assumed of $ 13 and contributions of $ 19 . divestitures in november 2014 , the company completed the sale of terratec , previously included in the market-based businesses . after post-close adjustments , net proceeds from the sale totaled $ 1 , and the company recorded a pretax loss on sale of $ 1 . the following table summarizes the operating results of discontinued operations presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenues</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 23</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total operating expenses net</td><td>19</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loss from discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provision ( benefit ) for income taxes</td><td>1</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>loss from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ -7 ( 7 )</td><td>$ -2 ( 2 )</td></tr></table> the provision for income taxes of discontinued operations includes the recognition of tax expense related to the difference between the tax basis and book basis of assets upon the sales of terratec that resulted in taxable gains , since an election was made under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the internal revenue code to treat the sales as asset sales . there were no assets or liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014. .\nQuestion: what were total operating expenses net in 2014?\nAnswer: 19.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "26.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8257	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmorgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) lending commitments . primary lending commitments are those that are originated by the company whereas secondary lending commitments are purchased from third parties in the market . the commitments include lending commitments that are made to investment grade and non-investment grade companies in connection with corporate lending and other business activities . commitments for secured lending transactions . secured lending commitments are extended by the company to companies and are secured by real estate or other physical assets of the borrower . loans made under these arrangements typically are at variable rates and generally provide for over-collateralization based upon the creditworthiness of the borrower . forward starting reverse repurchase agreements . the company has entered into forward starting securities purchased under agreements to resell ( agreements that have a trade date at or prior to december 31 , 2013 and settle subsequent to period-end ) that are primarily secured by collateral from u.s . government agency securities and other sovereign government obligations . commercial and residential mortgage-related commitments . the company enters into forward purchase contracts involving residential mortgage loans , residential mortgage lending commitments to individuals and residential home equity lines of credit . in addition , the company enters into commitments to originate commercial and residential mortgage loans . underwriting commitments . the company provides underwriting commitments in connection with its capital raising sources to a diverse group of corporate and other institutional clients . other lending commitments . other commitments generally include commercial lending commitments to small businesses and commitments related to securities-based lending activities in connection with the company 2019s wealth management business segment . the company sponsors several non-consolidated investment funds for third-party investors where the company typically acts as general partner of , and investment advisor to , these funds and typically commits to invest a minority of the capital of such funds , with subscribing third-party investors contributing the majority . the company 2019s employees , including its senior officers , as well as the company 2019s directors , may participate on the same terms and conditions as other investors in certain of these funds that the company forms primarily for client investment , except that the company may waive or lower applicable fees and charges for its employees . the company has contractual capital commitments , guarantees , lending facilities and counterparty arrangements with respect to these investment funds . premises and equipment . the company has non-cancelable operating leases covering premises and equipment ( excluding commodities operating leases , shown separately ) . at december 31 , 2013 , future minimum rental commitments under such leases ( net of subleases , principally on office rentals ) were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : year ended operating premises leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended</td><td>operating premises leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>656</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>621</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>554</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>481</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2712</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total of future minimum rental commitments in 2016?\nAnswer: 621.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2015?\nAnswer: 656.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in the total of future minimum rental commitments over the year?\nAnswer: -35.0\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to that total in 2015, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.05335" } ]
CONVFINQA10453	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninvestments prior to our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , we held common shares of keystone , which were classified as an available-for-sale investment security . accordingly , the investment was included in other assets at its fair value , with the unrealized gain excluded from earnings and included in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes . upon our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , the unrealized gain was removed from accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes , and the original cost of the common shares was considered a component of the purchase price . fair value of financial instruments our debt is reflected on the balance sheet at cost . based on current market conditions , our interest rate margins are below the rate available in the market , which causes the fair value of our debt to fall below the carrying value . the fair value of our term loans ( see note 6 , 201clong-term obligations 201d ) is approximately $ 570 million at december 31 , 2009 , as compared to the carrying value of $ 596 million . we estimated the fair value of our term loans by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume our obligations . the upfront cash payment , excluding any issuance costs , is the amount that a market participant would be able to lend at december 31 , 2009 to an entity with a credit rating similar to ours and achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the scheduled cash outflows under our term loans . the carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents , net trade receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value . we apply the market approach to value our financial assets and liabilities , which include the cash surrender value of life insurance , deferred compensation liabilities and interest rate swaps . the market approach utilizes available market information to estimate fair value . required fair value disclosures are included in note 8 , 201cfair value measurements . 201d accrued expenses we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program . we purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure . we also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , workers 2019 compensation and property under deductible insurance programs . the insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods . a reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analyses of historical data . we monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves . self-insurance reserves on the consolidated balance sheets are net of claims deposits of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.8 million , at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . while we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claim experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions . product warranties some of our mechanical products are sold with a standard six-month warranty against defects . we record the estimated warranty costs at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses . the changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of january 1 2008</td><td>$ 580</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>3681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-3721 ( 3721 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>540</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>5033</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-4969 ( 4969 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 604</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in warranty reserve balance from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: 64.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2008?\nAnswer: 540.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.11852" } ]
CONVFINQA10484	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in connection with the firm 2019s prime brokerage and clearing businesses , the firm agrees to clear and settle on behalf of its clients the transactions entered into by them with other brokerage firms . the firm 2019s obligations in respect of such transactions are secured by the assets in the client 2019s account as well as any proceeds received from the transactions cleared and settled by the firm on behalf of the client . in connection with joint venture investments , the firm may issue loan guarantees under which it may be liable in the event of fraud , misappropriation , environmental liabilities and certain other matters involving the borrower . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these guarantees and indemnifications have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . other representations , warranties and indemnifications . the firm provides representations and warranties to counterparties in connection with a variety of commercial transactions and occasionally indemnifies them against potential losses caused by the breach of those representations and warranties . the firm may also provide indemnifications protecting against changes in or adverse application of certain u.s . tax laws in connection with ordinary-course transactions such as securities issuances , borrowings or derivatives . in addition , the firm may provide indemnifications to some counterparties to protect them in the event additional taxes are owed or payments are withheld , due either to a change in or an adverse application of certain non-u.s . tax laws . these indemnifications generally are standard contractual terms and are entered into in the ordinary course of business . generally , there are no stated or notional amounts included in these indemnifications , and the contingencies triggering the obligation to indemnify are not expected to occur . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these arrangements have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) and gs bank usa , subject to certain exceptions . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.60 in 2016 , $ 2.55 in 2015 and $ 2.25 in 2014 . on january 17 , 2017 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.65 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2017 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2017 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td><td>year ended december 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>36.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 165.88</td><td>$ 189.41</td><td>$ 171.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 6069</td><td>$ 4195</td><td>$ 5469</td></tr></table> 172 goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what is the common equity dividends declared per common share in 2016?\nAnswer: 2.6\nQuestion: what about in 2015?\nAnswer: 2.55\nQuestion: what is the total dividends declared in these two years?\nAnswer: 5.15\nQuestion: what about the total dividends declared from 2014 to 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7.4" } ]
CONVFINQA314	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents ( 2 ) includes capitalized lease obligations of $ 3.2 million and $ 0.1 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income before interest expense , income tax expense , depreciation and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , means ebitda adjusted for certain items which are described in the table below . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda is also the primary measure used in certain key covenants and definitions contained in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , including the excess cash flow payment provision , the restricted payment covenant and the net leverage ratio . these covenants and definitions are material components of the term loan as they are used in determining the interest rate applicable to the term loan , our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>227.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>208.2</td><td>210.2</td><td>204.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>243.9</td><td>142.8</td><td>62.7</td><td>67.1</td><td>11.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>159.5</td><td>197.3</td><td>250.1</td><td>307.4</td><td>324.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ebitda</td><td>1033.9</td><td>792.9</td><td>653.8</td><td>703.7</td><td>557.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b )</td><td>10.1</td><td>-2.2 ( 2.2 )</td><td>-0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>6.9</td><td>9.2</td><td>82.7</td><td>23.9</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>adjusted ebitda ( f )</td><td>$ 1018.5</td><td>$ 907.0</td><td>$ 808.5</td><td>$ 766.6</td><td>$ 717.3</td></tr></table> net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a ) 24.3 90.7 64.0 17.2 118.9 loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b ) 10.1 ( 2.2 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.1 ) acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 6.9 9.2 82.7 23.9 21.6 adjusted ebitda ( f ) $ 1018.5 $ 907.0 $ 808.5 $ 766.6 $ 717.3 ( a ) during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded net losses on extinguishments of long-term debt . the losses represented the difference between the amount paid upon extinguishment , including call premiums and expenses paid to the debt holders and agents , and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt , adjusted for a portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs . ( b ) represents our share of net income/loss from our equity investments . our 35% ( 35 % ) share of kelway 2019s net loss includes our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to the acquisition . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway. .\nQuestion: what was the adjusted ebitda in 2015?\nAnswer: 111.5\nQuestion: and unadjusted ebitda during that time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1033.9" } ]
CONVFINQA3874	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units . restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years . the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period . dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares . the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions . the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares</td><td>weightedaveragegrant datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2016</td><td>1820578</td><td>$ 98</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>650942</td><td>129</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-510590 ( 510590 )</td><td>87</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-401699 ( 401699 )</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2017</td><td>1559231</td><td>116</td></tr></table> the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively . under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .\nQuestion: in 2017, what was the number of granted performance shares?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "203298.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9214	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 15 . exhibits , financial statement schedules . ( continued ) kinder morgan , inc . form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>kinder morgan liquids terminals llc-n.j . development revenue bonds due january 15 2018 kinder morgan columbus llc-5.50% ( llc-5.50 % ) ms development revenue note due september 1 2022</td><td>25.0 8.2</td><td>25.0 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kinder morgan operating l.p . 201cb 201d-jackson-union cos . il revenue bonds due april 1 2024</td><td>23.7</td><td>23.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international marine terminals-plaquemines la revenue bonds due march 15 2025</td><td>40.0</td><td>40.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other miscellaneous subsidiary debt</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unamortized debt discount on long-term debt</td><td>-20.3 ( 20.3 )</td><td>-21.2 ( 21.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-1263.3 ( 1263.3 )</td><td>-596.6 ( 596.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt 2013 kmp</td><td>$ 10282.8</td><td>$ 10007.5</td></tr></table> ____________ ( a ) as a result of the implementation of asu 2009-17 , effective january 1 , 2010 , we ( i ) include the transactions and balances of our business trust , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , in our consolidated financial statements and ( ii ) no longer include our junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued to the capital trusts ( see note 18 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d ) . ( b ) kmp issued its $ 500 million in principal amount of 9.00% ( 9.00 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2019 in december 2008 . each holder of the notes has the right to require kmp to repurchase all or a portion of the notes owned by such holder on february 1 , 2012 at a purchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes tendered by the holder plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the repurchase date . on and after february 1 , 2012 , interest will cease to accrue on the notes tendered for repayment . a holder 2019s exercise of the repurchase option is irrevocable . kinder morgan kansas , inc . the 2028 and 2098 debentures and the 2012 and 2015 senior notes are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . the 2027 debentures are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option after november 1 , 2004 at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . on september 2 , 2010 , kinder morgan kansas , inc . paid the remaining $ 1.1 million principal balance outstanding on kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) series debentures , due 2013 . kinder morgan finance company , llc on december 20 , 2010 , kinder morgan finance company , llc , a wholly owned subsidiary of kinder morgan kansas , inc. , completed a public offering of senior notes . it issued a total of $ 750 million in principal amount of 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) senior notes due january 15 , 2018 . net proceeds received from the issuance of the notes , after underwriting discounts and commissions , were $ 744.2 million , which were used to retire the principal amount of the 5.35% ( 5.35 % ) senior notes that matured on january 5 , 2011 . the 2011 , 2016 , 2018 and 2036 senior notes issued by kinder morgan finance company , llc are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . each series of these notes is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by kinder morgan kansas , inc . on a senior unsecured basis as to principal , interest and any additional amounts required to be paid as a result of any withholding or deduction for canadian taxes . capital trust securities kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s business trusts , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , are obligated for $ 12.7 million of 8.56% ( 8.56 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2027 and $ 14.4 million of 7.63% ( 7.63 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2028 , respectively , which it guarantees . the 2028 securities are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices as defined in the associated prospectus . the 2027 securities are redeemable in whole or in part at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option and at any time in certain limited circumstances upon the occurrence of certain events and at prices , all defined in the associated prospectus supplements . upon redemption by kinder morgan kansas , inc . or at maturity of the junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures , it must use the proceeds to make redemptions of the capital trust securities on a pro rata basis. .\nQuestion: what is the value of total long-term debt 2013 kmp?\nAnswer: 10282.8\nQuestion: what is the current portion of long-term debt?\nAnswer: 1263.3\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11546.1" } ]
CONVFINQA5808	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the \"2010 credit agreement\" ) which was subsequently terminated in july 2012 . the 2010 credit agreement provided for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into the 2010 credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the 2010 credit agreement was set to terminate on august 5 , 2013 . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 705 million of which $ 34 million was used as of december 31 , 2012 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 2.27% ( 2.27 % ) as of dec . 31 2012 and 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of december 31 2011</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2012 , total indebtedness was 42% ( 42 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 219 million , $ 212 million and $ 189 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . rental expense for operating leases was $ 233 million , $ 249 million and $ 233 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , are ( in millions ) $ 171 in 2013 , $ 135 in 2014 , $ 107 in 2015 , $ 83 in 2016 , $ 64 in 2017 and $ 135 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds of $ 119 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , guarantees outstanding were $ 96 million and $ 90 million , respectively . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 11 million and $ 13 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 11 million and $ 21 million , as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the fair value of each guarantee was estimated by comparing the net present value of two hypothetical cash flow streams , one based on ppg 2019s incremental borrowing rate and the other based on the borrower 2019s incremental borrowing rate , as of the effective date of the guarantee . both streams were discounted at a risk free rate of return . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit , surety bonds or guarantees is likely . 9 . fair value measurement the accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a hierarchy with three levels of inputs used to determine fair value . level 1 inputs are quoted prices ( unadjusted ) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities , are considered to be the most reliable evidence of fair value , and should be used whenever available . level 2 inputs are observable prices that are not quoted on active exchanges . level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs employed for measuring the fair value of assets or liabilities . table of contents notes to the consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what was the sum outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds?\nAnswer: 119.0\nQuestion: what was the value of guarantees?\nAnswer: 96.0\nQuestion: what is the sum of the outstanding letters of credit, surety bonds and guarantees?\nAnswer: 215.0\nQuestion: what is the value in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "215000000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1166	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwhen the likelihood of clawback is considered mathematically improbable . the company records a deferred carried interest liability to the extent it receives cash or capital allocations related to carried interest prior to meeting the revenue recognition criteria . at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company had $ 219 million and $ 152 million , respectively , of deferred carried interest recorded in other liabilities/other liabilities of consolidated vies on the consolidated statements of financial condition . a portion of the deferred carried interest liability will be paid to certain employees . the ultimate timing of the recognition of performance fee revenue , if any , for these products is unknown . the following table presents changes in the deferred carried interest liability ( including the portion related to consolidated vies ) for 2017 and 2016: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 152</td><td>$ 143</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in unrealized allocations</td><td>75</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>performance fee revenue recognized</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-28 ( 28 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquisition</td><td>13</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 152</td></tr></table> for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , performance fee revenue ( which included recognized carried interest ) totaled $ 594 million , $ 295 million and $ 621 million , respectively . fees earned for technology and risk management revenue are recorded as services are performed and are generally determined using the value of positions on the aladdin platform or on a fixed-rate basis . for 2017 , 2016 and 2016 , technology and risk management revenue totaled $ 677 million , $ 595 million and $ 528 million , respectively . adjustments to revenue arising from initial estimates recorded historically have been immaterial since the majority of blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration revenue is calculated based on aum and since the company does not record performance fee revenue until performance thresholds have been exceeded and the likelihood of clawback is mathematically improbable . accounting developments recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted . revenue from contracts with customers . in may 2014 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued accounting standards update ( 201casu 201d ) 2014-09 , revenue from contracts with customers ( 201casu 2014-09 201d ) . asu 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance , including industry-specific guidance . the guidance also changes the accounting for certain contract costs and revises the criteria for determining if an entity is acting as a principal or agent in certain arrangements . the key changes in the standard that impact the company 2019s revenue recognition relate to the presentation of certain revenue contracts and associated contract costs . the most significant of these changes relates to the presentation of certain distribution costs , which are currently presented net against revenues ( contra-revenue ) and will be presented as an expense on a gross basis . the company adopted asu 2014-09 effective january 1 , 2018 on a full retrospective basis , which will require 2016 and 2017 to be restated in future filings . the cumulative effect adjustment to the 2016 opening retained earnings was not material . the company currently expects the net gross up to revenue to be approximately $ 1 billion with a corresponding gross up to expense for both 2016 and 2017 . consequently , the company expects its gaap operating margin to decline upon adoption due to the gross up of revenue . however , no material impact is expected on the company 2019s as adjusted operating margin . for accounting pronouncements that the company adopted during the year ended december 31 , 2017 and for additional recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted , see note 2 , significant accounting policies , in the consolidated financial statements contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk aum market price risk . blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration fees are primarily comprised of fees based on a percentage of the value of aum and , in some cases , performance fees expressed as a percentage of the returns realized on aum . at december 31 , 2017 , the majority of the company 2019s investment advisory and administration fees were based on average or period end aum of the applicable investment funds or separate accounts . movements in equity market prices , interest rates/credit spreads , foreign exchange rates or all three could cause the value of aum to decline , which would result in lower investment advisory and administration fees . corporate investments portfolio risks . as a leading investment management firm , blackrock devotes significant resources across all of its operations to identifying , measuring , monitoring , managing and analyzing market and operating risks , including the management and oversight of its own investment portfolio . the board of directors of the company has adopted guidelines for the review of investments to be made by the company , requiring , among other things , that investments be reviewed by certain senior officers of the company , and that certain investments may be referred to the audit committee or the board of directors , depending on the circumstances , for approval . in the normal course of its business , blackrock is exposed to equity market price risk , interest rate/credit spread risk and foreign exchange rate risk associated with its corporate investments . blackrock has investments primarily in sponsored investment products that invest in a variety of asset classes , including real assets , private equity and hedge funds . investments generally are made for co-investment purposes , to establish a performance track record , to hedge exposure to certain deferred compensation plans or for regulatory purposes . currently , the company has a seed capital hedging program in which it enters into swaps to hedge market and interest rate exposure to certain investments . at december 31 , 2017 , the company had outstanding total return swaps with an aggregate notional value of approximately $ 587 million . at december 31 , 2017 , there were no outstanding interest rate swaps. .\nQuestion: what is the revenue related technology and risk management in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "595.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3860	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) the following summarizes the aggregate maturities of our debt and capital leases on stated contractual maturities , excluding unamortized non-cash bond premiums and discounts net of $ 30 million as of december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 1045</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>1157</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>1546</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>705</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>4349</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total principal payments</td><td>8846</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>debt issuance costs net of accumulated amortization</td><td>-53 ( 53 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>$ 8793</td></tr></table> there are no mandatory principal payments on the revolving loan and any balance outstanding on the revolving loan will be due and payable at its scheduled maturity date , which occurs at august 10 , 2021 . fis may redeem the 2018 notes , 2020 notes , 2021 notes , 2021 euro notes , 2022 notes , 2022 gbp notes , 2023 notes , 2024 notes , 2024 euro notes , 2025 notes , 2026 notes , and 2046 notes at its option in whole or in part , at any time and from time to time , at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount to be redeemed and a make-whole amount calculated as described in the related indenture in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the date of redemption , provided no make-whole amount will be paid for redemptions of the 2020 notes , the 2021 notes , the 2021 euro notes and the 2022 gbp notes during the one month prior to their maturity , the 2022 notes during the two months prior to their maturity , the 2023 notes , the 2024 notes , the 2024 euro notes , the 2025 notes , and the 2026 notes during the three months prior to their maturity , and the 2046 notes during the six months prior to their maturity . debt issuance costs of $ 53 million , net of accumulated amortization , remain capitalized as of december 31 , 2017 , related to all of the above outstanding debt . we monitor the financial stability of our counterparties on an ongoing basis . the lender commitments under the undrawn portions of the revolving loan are comprised of a diversified set of financial institutions , both domestic and international . the failure of any single lender to perform its obligations under the revolving loan would not adversely impact our ability to fund operations . the fair value of the company 2019s long-term debt is estimated to be approximately $ 156 million higher than the carrying value as of december 31 , 2017 . this estimate is based on quoted prices of our senior notes and trades of our other debt in close proximity to december 31 , 2017 , which are considered level 2-type measurements . this estimate is subjective in nature and involves uncertainties and significant judgment in the interpretation of current market data . therefore , the values presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the company could realize or settle currently. .\nQuestion: what portion of total long-term deb is due in 12 months?\nAnswer: 0.11884\nQuestion: what is the value of long-term debt due in 2021?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1546.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6550	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n25feb201400255845 performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of five year cumulative total return 2008 2009 2010 2011 20132012 edwards lifesciences s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>total cumulative return</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>edwards lifesciences</td><td>$ 158.05</td><td>$ 294.23</td><td>$ 257.32</td><td>$ 328.19</td><td>$ 239.34</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>126.46</td><td>145.51</td><td>148.59</td><td>172.37</td><td>228.19</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment index</td><td>120.83</td><td>117.02</td><td>123.37</td><td>145.84</td><td>186.00</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of edwards lifesciences in 2013 less 100?\nAnswer: 139.34\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.3934" } ]
CONVFINQA5167	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncomparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31</td><td>citigroup</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>s&p financial index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>104.38</td><td>104.83</td><td>106.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>124.02</td><td>121.20</td><td>126.41</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>70.36</td><td>127.85</td><td>103.47</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>18.71</td><td>81.12</td><td>47.36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>9.26</td><td>102.15</td><td>55.27</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the value of an investment in citigroup in 2009?\nAnswer: 9.26\nQuestion: what about the initial value of the investment?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what is the change in value?\nAnswer: -90.74\nQuestion: what is the initial value of the investment?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what return rate does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.9074" } ]
CONVFINQA588	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .\nQuestion: what was the value of accumulated amortization in 2005?\nAnswer: 646560.0\nQuestion: what is that value divided by 1000?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "646.56" } ]
CONVFINQA6541	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n112 / sl green realty corp . 2017 annual report 20 . commitments and contingencies legal proceedings as of december a031 , 2017 , the company and the operating partnership were not involved in any material litigation nor , to management 2019s knowledge , was any material litigation threat- ened against us or our portfolio which if adversely determined could have a material adverse impact on us . environmental matters our management believes that the properties are in compliance in all material respects with applicable federal , state and local ordinances and regulations regarding environmental issues . management is not aware of any environmental liability that it believes would have a materially adverse impact on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . management is unaware of any instances in which it would incur significant envi- ronmental cost if any of our properties were sold . employment agreements we have entered into employment agreements with certain exec- utives , which expire between december a02018 and february a02020 . the minimum cash-based compensation , including base sal- ary and guaranteed bonus payments , associated with these employment agreements total $ 5.4 a0million for 2018 . in addition these employment agreements provide for deferred compen- sation awards based on our stock price and which were valued at $ 1.6 a0million on the grant date . the value of these awards may change based on fluctuations in our stock price . insurance we maintain 201call-risk 201d property and rental value coverage ( includ- ing coverage regarding the perils of flood , earthquake and terrorism , excluding nuclear , biological , chemical , and radiological terrorism ( 201cnbcr 201d ) ) , within three property insurance programs and liability insurance . separate property and liability coverage may be purchased on a stand-alone basis for certain assets , such as the development of one vanderbilt . additionally , our captive insurance company , belmont insurance company , or belmont , pro- vides coverage for nbcr terrorist acts above a specified trigger , although if belmont is required to pay a claim under our insur- ance policies , we would ultimately record the loss to the extent of belmont 2019s required payment . however , there is no assurance that in the future we will be able to procure coverage at a reasonable cost . further , if we experience losses that are uninsured or that exceed policy limits , we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those plan trustees adopted a rehabilitation plan consistent with this requirement . no surcharges have been paid to the pension plan as of december a031 , 2017 . for the pension plan years ended june a030 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , the plan received contributions from employers totaling $ 257.8 a0million , $ 249.5 a0million , and $ 221.9 a0million . our contributions to the pension plan represent less than 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) of total contributions to the plan . the health plan was established under the terms of collective bargaining agreements between the union , the realty advisory board on labor relations , inc . and certain other employees . the health plan provides health and other benefits to eligible participants employed in the building service industry who are covered under collective bargaining agreements , or other writ- ten agreements , with the union . the health plan is administered by a board of trustees with equal representation by the employ- ers and the union and operates under employer identification number a013-2928869 . the health plan receives contributions in accordance with collective bargaining agreements or participa- tion agreements . generally , these agreements provide that the employers contribute to the health plan at a fixed rate on behalf of each covered employee . for the health plan years ended , june a030 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , the plan received contributions from employers totaling $ 1.3 a0billion , $ 1.2 a0billion and $ 1.1 a0billion , respectively . our contributions to the health plan represent less than 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) of total contributions to the plan . contributions we made to the multi-employer plans for the years ended december a031 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are included in the table below ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benefit plan</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension plan</td><td>$ 3856</td><td>$ 3979</td><td>$ 2732</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>health plan</td><td>11426</td><td>11530</td><td>8736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other plans</td><td>1463</td><td>1583</td><td>5716</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total plan contributions</td><td>$ 16745</td><td>$ 17092</td><td>$ 17184</td></tr></table> 401 ( k ) plan in august a01997 , we implemented a 401 ( k ) a0savings/retirement plan , or the 401 ( k ) a0plan , to cover eligible employees of ours , and any designated affiliate . the 401 ( k ) a0plan permits eligible employees to defer up to 15% ( 15 % ) of their annual compensation , subject to certain limitations imposed by the code . the employees 2019 elective deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contribution to the 401 ( k ) a0plan . during a02003 , we amended our 401 ( k ) a0plan to pro- vide for discretionary matching contributions only . for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a matching contribution equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 6% ( 6 % ) of annual compensation was made . for the year ended december a031 , 2017 , we made a matching contribution of $ 728782 . for the years ended december a031 , 2016 and 2015 , we made matching contribu- tions of $ 566000 and $ 550000 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what portion of total plan contributions is related to pension plan in 2017?\nAnswer: 0.23028\nQuestion: what is the net change in the amount received contributions from employers from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer: 27.6\nQuestion: what about the amount received contributions from employers in 2015?\nAnswer: 221.9\nQuestion: what growth rate does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.12438" } ]
CONVFINQA9994	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table displays the expected benefit payments in the years indicated : ( dollars in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 117</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>203</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>next 5 years</td><td>2731</td></tr></table> 1 4 . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s a n d s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n a . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s under bermuda law , group is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities and its issued share capital and share premium ( addi- tional paid-in capital ) accounts . group 2019s ability to pay dividends and its operating expenses is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries . the payment of such dividends by insurer subsidiaries is limited under bermuda law and the laws of the var- ious u.s . states in which group 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled or deemed domiciled . the limitations are generally based upon net income and compliance with applicable policyholders 2019 surplus or minimum solvency margin and liquidity ratio requirements as determined in accordance with the relevant statutory accounting practices . under bermuda law , bermuda re is prohibited from declaring or making payment of a dividend if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin or minimum liquidity ratio . as a long-term insurer , bermuda re is also unable to declare or pay a dividend to anyone who is not a policyholder unless , after payment of the dividend , the value of the assets in its long-term business fund , as certified by its approved actuary , exceeds its liabilities for long-term business by at least the $ 250000 minimum solvency margin . prior approval of the bermuda monetary authority is required if bermuda re 2019s dividend payments would reduce its prior year-end total statutory capital by 15.0% ( 15.0 % ) or more . delaware law provides that an insurance company which is a member of an insurance holding company system and is domi- ciled in the state shall not pay dividends without giving prior notice to the insurance commissioner of delaware and may not pay dividends without the approval of the insurance commissioner if the value of the proposed dividend , together with all other dividends and distributions made in the preceding twelve months , exceeds the greater of ( 1 ) 10% ( 10 % ) of statutory surplus or ( 2 ) net income , not including realized capital gains , each as reported in the prior year 2019s statutory annual statement . in addition , no dividend may be paid in excess of unassigned earned surplus . at december 31 , 2006 , everest re had $ 270.4 million available for payment of dividends in 2007 without the need for prior regulatory approval . b . s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n everest re prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the national association of insurance commissioners ( 201cnaic 201d ) and the delaware insurance department . prescribed statutory accounting practices are set forth in the naic accounting practices and procedures manual . the capital and statutory surplus of everest re was $ 2704.1 million ( unaudited ) and $ 2327.6 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of everest re was $ 298.7 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 26.9 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income $ 175.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . bermuda re prepares its statutory financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles set forth in bermuda in the insurance act 1978 , amendments thereto and related regulations . the statutory capital and surplus of bermuda re was $ 1893.9 million ( unaudited ) and $ 1522.5 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of bermuda re was $ 409.8 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 220.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income was $ 248.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . 1 5 . c o n t i n g e n c i e s in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance , reinsur- ance and other contractual agreements . in some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it . in other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights . these disputes arise from time to time and as they arise are addressed , and ultimately resolved , through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation . in all such matters , the company believes that .\nQuestion: what were the expected benefit payments in 2007 and 2008 combined?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "257.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5154	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents marketaxess holdings inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of this standard had no material effect on the company 2019s consolidated statements of financial condition and consolidated statements of operations . reclassifications certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years 2019 financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation . such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income . on march 5 , 2008 , the company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of greenline financial technologies , inc . ( 201cgreenline 201d ) , an illinois-based provider of integration , testing and management solutions for fix-related products and services designed to optimize electronic trading of fixed-income , equity and other exchange-based products , and approximately ten percent of the outstanding capital stock of tradehelm , inc. , a delaware corporation that was spun-out from greenline immediately prior to the acquisition . the acquisition of greenline broadens the range of technology services that the company offers to institutional financial markets , provides an expansion of the company 2019s client base , including global exchanges and hedge funds , and further diversifies the company 2019s revenues beyond the core electronic credit trading products . the results of operations of greenline are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition . the aggregate consideration for the greenline acquisition was $ 41.1 million , comprised of $ 34.7 million in cash , 725923 shares of common stock valued at $ 5.8 million and $ 0.6 million of acquisition-related costs . in addition , the sellers were eligible to receive up to an aggregate of $ 3.0 million in cash , subject to greenline attaining certain earn- out targets in 2008 and 2009 . a total of $ 1.4 million was paid to the sellers in 2009 based on the 2008 earn-out target , bringing the aggregate consideration to $ 42.4 million . the 2009 earn-out target was not met . a total of $ 2.0 million of the purchase price , which had been deposited into escrow accounts to satisfy potential indemnity claims , was distributed to the sellers in march 2009 . the shares of common stock issued to each selling shareholder of greenline were released in two equal installments on december 20 , 2008 and december 20 , 2009 , respectively . the value ascribed to the shares was discounted from the market value to reflect the non-marketability of such shares during the restriction period . the purchase price allocation is as follows ( in thousands ) : the amortizable intangibles include $ 3.2 million of acquired technology , $ 3.3 million of customer relationships , $ 1.3 million of non-competition agreements and $ 0.5 million of tradenames . useful lives of ten years and five years have been assigned to the customer relationships intangible and all other amortizable intangibles , respectively . the identifiable intangible assets and goodwill are not deductible for tax purposes . the following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information reflects the results of operations of the company for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as if the acquisition of greenline had occurred as of the beginning of the period presented , after giving effect to certain purchase accounting adjustments . these pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what the company 2019s operating results would have been had the acquisition actually taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented . the pro forma financial information 3 . acquisitions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 6406</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>2139</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortizable intangibles</td><td>8330</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill</td><td>29405</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred tax assets net</td><td>3410</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets including investment in tradehelm</td><td>1429</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable accrued expenses and deferred revenue</td><td>-8701 ( 8701 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 42418</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: in 2009, what percentage of the total aggregate consideration for the greenline acquisition was paid to the sellers based on the 2008 earn-out target?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.03302" } ]
CONVFINQA3877	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units . restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years . the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period . dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares . the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions . the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares</td><td>weightedaveragegrant datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2016</td><td>1820578</td><td>$ 98</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>650942</td><td>129</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-510590 ( 510590 )</td><td>87</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-401699 ( 401699 )</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2017</td><td>1559231</td><td>116</td></tr></table> the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively . under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .\nQuestion: in 2017, what was the number of granted performance shares?\nAnswer: 203298.0\nQuestion: and what was the total number of granted shares?\nAnswer: 650942.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total did that performance shares number represent?\nAnswer: 0.31231\nQuestion: and from 2016 to that year, what was the total of compensation expense attributable to directors?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.9" } ]
CONVFINQA9370	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin june 2011 , the fasb issued asu no . 2011-05 201ccomprehensive income 2013 presentation of comprehensive income . 201d asu 2011-05 requires comprehensive income , the components of net income , and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements . in both choices , an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income , each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income , and a total amount for comprehensive income . this update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity . the amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income . the amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2011 . the company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2012 . the adoption of asu 2011-05 is for presentation purposes only and had no material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at both december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2012 and prior years . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 24087 and $ 29554 in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2010 , respectively . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 , due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products have generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( \"fifo\" ) method . product cores are included as part of the company's merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company's other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , were $ 134258 and $ 126840 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at the end of fiscal 2012 and 2011 were as follows : december 29 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 292012</td><td>december 312011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 2182419</td><td>$ 1941055</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>126190</td><td>102103</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 2308609</td><td>$ 2043158</td></tr></table> inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company completes physical inventories and other targeted inventory counts in its store locations to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory in these locations . in its distribution centers and pdq aes , the company uses a cycle counting program to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and product core inventory . reserves advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 29 , 2012 , december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 ( in thousands , except per share data ) .\nQuestion: what was the net change in inventories at lifo net between 2011 and 2012?\nAnswer: 265451.0\nQuestion: what is the net change over the 2011 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.12992" } ]
CONVFINQA6468	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) stock-based compensation 2014the company complies with the provisions of sfas no . 148 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation 2014transition and disclosure 2014an amendment of sfas no . 123 , 201d which provides optional transition guidance for those companies electing to voluntarily adopt the accounting provisions of sfas no . 123 . the company continues to use accounting principles board opinion no . 25 ( apb no . 25 ) , 201caccounting for stock issued to employees , 201d to account for equity grants and awards to employees , officers and directors and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 148 . in accordance with apb no . 25 , the company recognizes compensation expense based on the excess , if any , of the quoted stock price at the grant date of the award or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock . the company 2019s stock option plans are more fully described in note 13 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , 201cshare-based payment 201d ( sfas no . 123r ) , described below . the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 ( as amended ) to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net loss as reported</td><td>$ -247587 ( 247587 )</td><td>$ -325321 ( 325321 )</td><td>$ -1163540 ( 1163540 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : stock-based employee compensation expense associated with modifications net of related tax effect included in net loss asreported</td><td>2297</td><td>2077</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards net of related taxeffect</td><td>-23906 ( 23906 )</td><td>-31156 ( 31156 )</td><td>-38126 ( 38126 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pro-forma net loss</td><td>$ -269196 ( 269196 )</td><td>$ -354400 ( 354400 )</td><td>$ -1201666 ( 1201666 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported</td><td>$ -1.10 ( 1.10 )</td><td>$ -1.56 ( 1.56 )</td><td>$ -5.95 ( 5.95 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share pro-forma</td><td>$ -1.20 ( 1.20 )</td><td>$ -1.70 ( 1.70 )</td><td>$ -6.15 ( 6.15 )</td></tr></table> during the year ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , the company modified certain option awards to accelerate vesting and recorded charges of $ 3.0 million and $ 2.3 million , respectively , and corresponding increases to additional paid in capital in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . fair value of financial instruments 2014the carrying values of the company 2019s financial instruments , with the exception of long-term obligations , including current portion , reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 . as of december 31 , 2004 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.3 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . as of december 31 , 2003 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.4 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . fair values are based primarily on quoted market prices for those or similar instruments . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . under the plan , the company matching contribution for periods prior to june 30 , 2004 was 35% ( 35 % ) up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . effective july 1 , 2004 , the plan was amended to increase the company match to 50% ( 50 % ) up to a maximum 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . the company contributed approximately $ 533000 , $ 825000 and $ 979000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , which is a revision of sfas no . 123 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation , 201d and supersedes apb no . 25 , accounting for .\nQuestion: what was the amount of contributions in 2003?\nAnswer: 825000.0\nQuestion: and for 2002?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "979000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10155	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 164 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report firm ) is required to hold more than the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) . the tier i common equity standard is effective from the first quarter of 2015 . the following chart presents the basel iii minimum risk-based capital ratios during the transitional periods and on a fully phased-in basis . the chart also includes management 2019s target for the firm 2019s tier 1 common ratio . it is the firm 2019s current expectation that its basel iii tier 1 common ratio will exceed the regulatory minimums , both during the transition period and upon full implementation in 2019 and thereafter . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under the basel iii advanced approach on a fully phased-in basis would be 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 , achieving management 2019s previously stated objectives . the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non-gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under the advanced approach of the basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . key differences in the calculation of rwa between basel i and basel iii advanced approach include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk- weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; and ( 2 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . operational risk capital takes into consideration operational losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized , and the calculation generally incorporates such losses irrespective of whether the issues or business activity giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced . the firm 2019s operational risk capital model continues to be refined in conjunction with the firm 2019s basel iii advanced approach parallel run . as a result of model enhancements in 2013 , as well as taking into consideration the legal expenses incurred by the firm in 2013 , the firm 2019s operational risk capital increased substantially in 2013 over 2012 . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( 201caoci 201d ) related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . december 31 , 2013 ( in millions , except ratios ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tier 1 common under basel i rules</td><td>$ 148887</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add back of basel i deductions ( a )</td><td>1780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deduction for deferred tax asset related to net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards</td><td>-741 ( 741 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>-198 ( 198 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules</td><td>$ 151202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b )</td><td>$ 1590873</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c )</td><td>9.5% ( 9.5 % )</td></tr></table> estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b ) $ 1590873 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c ) 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) ( a ) certain exposures , which are deducted from capital under basel i , are risked-weighted under basel iii. .\nQuestion: what is the value of estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules?\nAnswer: 151202.0\nQuestion: what is the tier 1 common ratio as of 2013?\nAnswer: 0.094\nQuestion: what is the quotient of the value over the ratio?\nAnswer: 1608531.91489\nQuestion: what is that quotient multiplied by the 6.5% equity standard?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "104554.57447" } ]
CONVFINQA10780	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nas of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , our liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits are not material . we and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the statute of limitations is no longer open for u.s . federal or non-u.s . income tax examinations for the years before 2011 , other than with respect to refunds . u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on earnings of $ 291 million , $ 222 million and $ 211 million that have not been distributed by our non-u.s . companies as of december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . our intention is to permanently reinvest these earnings , thereby indefinitely postponing their remittance to the u.s . if these earnings had been remitted , we estimate that the additional income taxes after foreign tax credits would have been approximately $ 55 million in 2014 , $ 50 million in 2013 and $ 45 million in 2012 . our federal and foreign income tax payments , net of refunds received , were $ 1.5 billion in 2014 , $ 787 million in 2013 and $ 890 million in 2012 . our 2014 and 2013 net payments reflect a $ 200 million and $ 550 million refund from the irs primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions during the fourth quarters of 2013 and 2012 , and our 2012 net payments reflect a $ 153 million refund from the irs related to a 2011 capital loss carryback . note 8 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042</td><td>$ 5642</td><td>$ 5642</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2016 to 2036</td><td>916</td><td>916</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other debt</td><td>483</td><td>476</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>7041</td><td>7034</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less : unamortized discounts</td><td>-872 ( 872 )</td><td>-882 ( 882 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 6169</td><td>$ 6152</td></tr></table> in august 2014 , we entered into a new $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks and concurrently terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility which was scheduled to expire in august 2016 . the new credit facility expires august 2019 and we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the new credit facility of up to an additional $ 500 million . the credit facility also includes a sublimit of up to $ 300 million available for the issuance of letters of credit . there were no borrowings outstanding under the new facility through december 31 , 2014 . borrowings under the new credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the new credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the credit facility . the leverage ratio covenant excludes the adjustments recognized in stockholders 2019 equity related to postretirement benefit plans . as of december 31 , 2014 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the credit facility , as well as in our debt agreements . we have agreements in place with financial institutions to provide for the issuance of commercial paper . there were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding during 2014 or 2013 . if we were to issue commercial paper , the borrowings would be supported by the credit facility . in april 2013 , we repaid $ 150 million of long-term notes with a fixed interest rate of 7.38% ( 7.38 % ) due to their scheduled maturities . during the next five years , we have scheduled long-term debt maturities of $ 952 million due in 2016 and $ 900 million due in 2019 . interest payments were $ 326 million in 2014 , $ 340 million in 2013 and $ 378 million in 2012 . all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness rank equally in right of payment . note 9 2013 postretirement plans defined benefit pension plans and retiree medical and life insurance plans many of our employees are covered by qualified defined benefit pension plans and we provide certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retirees ( collectively , postretirement benefit plans ) . we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit pension plans to provide for benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . non-union represented employees hired after december 2005 do not participate in our qualified defined benefit pension plans , but are eligible to participate in a qualified .\nQuestion: what is the change in the balance of net total long-term debt from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: 17.0\nQuestion: what is the average balance for these years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.5" } ]
CONVFINQA3309	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nforeign currency exchange rate risk many of our non-u.s . companies maintain both assets and liabilities in local currencies . therefore , foreign exchange rate risk is generally limited to net assets denominated in those foreign currencies . foreign exchange rate risk is reviewed as part of our risk management process . locally required capital levels are invested in home currencies in order to satisfy regulatory require- ments and to support local insurance operations regardless of currency fluctuations . the principal currencies creating foreign exchange risk for us are the british pound sterling , the euro , and the canadian dollar . the following table provides more information on our exposure to foreign exchange rate risk at december 31 , 2008 and 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value of net assets denominated in foreign currencies</td><td>$ 1127</td><td>$ 1651</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>percentage of fair value of total net assets</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>9.9% ( 9.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pre-tax impact on equity of hypothetical 10 percent strengthening of the u.s . dollar</td><td>$ 84</td><td>$ 150</td></tr></table> reinsurance of gmdb and gmib guarantees our net income is directly impacted by changes in the reserves calculated in connection with the reinsurance of variable annuity guarantees , primarily gmdb and gmib . these reserves are calculated in accordance with sop 03-1 ( sop reserves ) and changes in these reserves are reflected as life and annuity benefit expense , which is included in life underwriting income . in addition , our net income is directly impacted by the change in the fair value of the gmib liability ( fvl ) , which is classified as a derivative according to fas 133 . the fair value liability established for a gmib reinsurance contract represents the differ- ence between the fair value of the contract and the sop 03-1 reserves . changes in the fair value of the gmib liability , net of associated changes in the calculated sop 03-1 reserve , are reflected as realized gains or losses . ace views our variable annuity reinsurance business as having a similar risk profile to that of catastrophe reinsurance , with the probability of long-term economic loss relatively small at the time of pricing . adverse changes in market factors and policyholder behavior will have an impact on both life underwriting income and net income . when evaluating these risks , we expect to be compensated for taking both the risk of a cumulative long-term economic net loss , as well as the short-term accounting variations caused by these market movements . therefore , we evaluate this business in terms of its long-term eco- nomic risk and reward . the ultimate risk to the variable annuity guaranty reinsurance business is a long-term underperformance of investment returns , which can be exacerbated by a long-term reduction in interest rates . following a market downturn , continued market underperformance over a period of five to seven years would eventually result in a higher level of paid claims as policyholders accessed their guarantees through death or annuitization . however , if market conditions improved following a downturn , sop 03-1 reserves and fair value liability would fall reflecting a decreased likelihood of future claims , which would result in an increase in both life underwriting income and net income . as of december 31 , 2008 , management established the sop 03-1 reserve based on the benefit ratio calculated using actual market values at december 31 , 2008 . management exercises judgment in determining the extent to which short-term market movements impact the sop 03-1 reserve . the sop 03-1 reserve is based on the calculation of a long-term benefit ratio ( or loss ratio ) for the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance . despite the long-term nature of the risk the benefit ratio calculation is impacted by short-term market movements that may be judged by management to be temporary or transient . management will , in keeping with the language in sop 03-1 , regularly examine both quantitative and qualitative analysis and management will determine if , in its judgment , the change in the calculated benefit ratio is of sufficient magnitude and has persisted for a sufficient duration to warrant a change in the benefit ratio used to establish the sop 03-1 reserve . this has no impact on either premium received or claims paid nor does it impact the long-term profit or loss of the variable annuity guaran- tee reinsurance . the sop 03-1 reserve and fair value liability calculations are directly affected by market factors , including equity levels , interest rate levels , credit risk and implied volatilities , as well as policyholder behaviors , such as annuitization and lapse rates . the table below shows the sensitivity , as of december 31 , 2008 , of the sop 03-1 reserves and fair value liability associated with the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance portfolio . in addition , the tables below show the sensitivity of the fair value of specific derivative instruments held ( hedge value ) , which includes instruments purchased in january 2009 , to partially offset the risk in the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance portfolio . although these derivatives do not receive hedge accounting treatment , some portion of the change in value may be used to offset changes in the sop 03-1 reserve. .\nQuestion: what was the fair value of net assets denominated in foreign currencies in the year of 2007?\nAnswer: 1127.0\nQuestion: and what was that of 2008?\nAnswer: 1651.0\nQuestion: what is, then, the difference between the fair value net assets denominated in foreign currencies of 2008 and 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-524.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7164	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 59 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 13 . debt and interest costs ( continued ) long-term debt obligations outstanding at december 31 , 2007 , have maturities of $ 127.1 million , $ 160 million , $ 388.4 million , $ 625.1 million and $ 550.3 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and $ 456.1 million thereafter . ball provides letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure liabilities recorded in connection with industrial development revenue bonds and certain self-insurance arrangements . letters of credit outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 41 million and $ 52.4 million , respectively . the notes payable and senior credit facilities are guaranteed on a full , unconditional and joint and several basis by certain of the company 2019s domestic wholly owned subsidiaries . certain foreign denominated tranches of the senior credit facilities are similarly guaranteed by certain of the company 2019s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries . note 22 contains further details as well as condensed , consolidating financial information for the company , segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments , share repurchases , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . on march 27 , 2006 , ball expanded its senior secured credit facilities with the addition of a $ 500 million term d loan facility due in installments through october 2011 . also on march 27 , 2006 , ball issued at a price of 99.799 percent $ 450 million of 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) senior notes ( effective yield to maturity of 6.65 percent ) due in march 2018 . the proceeds from these financings were used to refinance existing u.s . can debt with ball corporation debt at lower interest rates , acquire certain north american plastic container net assets from alcan and reduce seasonal working capital debt . ( see note 3 for further details of the acquisitions. ) on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities to extend debt maturities at lower interest rate spreads and provide the company with additional borrowing capacity for future growth . during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due in august 2006 . the refinancing and senior note redemptions resulted in a debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) for the related call premium and unamortized debt issuance costs . a summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest costs before refinancing costs</td><td>$ 155.8</td><td>$ 142.5</td><td>$ 102.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt refinancing costs</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>19.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total interest costs</td><td>155.8</td><td>142.5</td><td>121.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amounts capitalized</td><td>-6.4 ( 6.4 )</td><td>-8.1 ( 8.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>interest expense</td><td>$ 149.4</td><td>$ 134.4</td><td>$ 116.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest paid during the year ( a )</td><td>$ 153.9</td><td>$ 125.4</td><td>$ 138.5</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 6.6 million paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of the company 2019s senior and senior subordinated notes. .\nQuestion: what is the balance of letters of credit outstanding as of december 31, 2007?\nAnswer: 41.0\nQuestion: what about 2006?\nAnswer: 52.4\nQuestion: what is the total of letters of credit outstanding for 2006 and 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "93.4" } ]
CONVFINQA3735	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\napplication of specific accounting literature . for the nonconsolidated proprietary tob trusts and qspe tob trusts , the company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet . the following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to municipal bond securitizations for the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 : in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proceeds from new securitizations</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 10.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows</td><td>0.5</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows 0.5 2014 2014 municipal investments municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing . the company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership . client intermediation client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security , referenced asset or index . these transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes . in these transactions , the spe typically obtains exposure to the underlying security , referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument , such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap . in turn the spe issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security , referenced asset or index . the spe invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract ( gic ) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction . the company 2019s involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the spe 2019s derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the spe . in certain transactions , the investor 2019s maximum risk of loss is limited and the company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level . the company 2019s maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the spe and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the company through a separate instrument issued by the spe . the derivative instrument held by the company may generate a receivable from the spe ( for example , where the company purchases credit protection from the spe in connection with the spe 2019s issuance of a credit-linked note ) , which is collateralized by the assets owned by the spe . these derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under fin 46 ( r ) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the spe . structured investment vehicles structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) are spes that issue junior notes and senior debt ( medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper ) to fund the purchase of high quality assets . the junior notes are subject to the 201cfirst loss 201d risk of the sivs . the sivs provide a variable return to the junior note investors based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high quality assets . the company acts as manager for the sivs and , prior to december 13 , 2007 , was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the sivs . in response to the ratings review of the outstanding senior debt of the sivs for a possible downgrade announced by two ratings agencies and the continued reduction of liquidity in the siv-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets , on december 13 , 2007 , citigroup announced its commitment to provide support facilities that would support the sivs 2019 senior debt ratings . as a result of this commitment , citigroup became the sivs 2019 primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities . on february 12 , 2008 , citigroup finalized the terms of the support facilities , which took the form of a commitment to provide $ 3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the sivs in the event the market value of their junior notes approaches zero . the mezzanine capital facility was increased by $ 1 billion to $ 4.5 billion , with the additional commitment funded during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the facilities rank senior to the junior notes but junior to the commercial paper and medium-term notes . the facilities were at arm 2019s-length terms . interest was paid on the drawn amount of the facilities and a per annum fee was paid on the unused portion . during the period to november 18 , 2008 , the company wrote down $ 3.3 billion on siv assets . in order to complete the wind-down of the sivs , the company , in a nearly cashless transaction , purchased the remaining assets of the sivs at fair value , with a trade date of november 18 , 2008 . the company funded the purchase of the siv assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the sivs , as the medium-term notes mature . the net funding provided by the company to fund the purchase of the siv assets was $ 0.3 billion . as of december 31 , 2008 , the carrying amount of the purchased siv assets was $ 16.6 billion , of which $ 16.5 billion is classified as htm assets . investment funds the company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity , hedge funds , real estate , fixed income and infrastructure . the company earns a management fee , which is a percentage of capital under management , and may earn performance fees . in addition , for some of these funds the company has an ownership interest in the investment funds . the company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments . the company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees 2019 investment commitments. .\nQuestion: what are the proceeds from new securitizations in 2008?\nAnswer: 1.2\nQuestion: what about in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "10.5" } ]
CONVFINQA301	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )</td><td>$ 36.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>-26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>27.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .\nQuestion: what was the change in interest income from the year of 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: 2.7\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to the interest income in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.10931" } ]
CONVFINQA2050	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .\nQuestion: what is the value of the investment in ventas at the end of 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "512.0" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.