Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA5093	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nequity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2014 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1955024 $ 36.06 4078093 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1955024</td><td>$ 36.06</td><td>4078093</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1955024</td><td>$ 36.06</td><td>4078093</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2012 plan\" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2011 plan\" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 644321 were subject to stock options , 539742 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , and 63022 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 33571 stock rights , 11046 restricted stock rights and 663322 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 644321 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . this proof is printed at 96% ( 96 % ) of original size this line represents final trim and will not print .\nQuestion: what was the number of outstanding options warrants and rights?\nAnswer: 1955024.0\nQuestion: what was the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4078093.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3840	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntransfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>2140511</td><td>$ 20.54</td><td>2139507</td><td>$ 227368014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1126378</td><td>$ 22.95</td><td>1124601</td><td>$ 201557625</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1881992</td><td>$ 22.97</td><td>1872650</td><td>$ 158553178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5148881</td><td>$ 21.96</td><td>5136758</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .\nQuestion: what were the total number of shares purchased in october?\nAnswer: 2140511.0\nQuestion: what was the total number of shares purchased in november?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1126378.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4164	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe city council 2019s advisors and entergy new orleans . in february 2018 the city council approved the settlement , which deferred cost recovery to the 2018 entergy new orleans rate case , but also stated that an adjustment for 2018-2019 ami costs can be filed in the rate case and that , for all subsequent ami costs , the mechanism to be approved in the 2018 rate case will allow for the timely recovery of such costs . sources of capital entergy new orleans 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt and preferred membership interest issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy new orleans may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest rates are favorable . entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 12723</td><td>$ 14215</td><td>$ 15794</td><td>$ 442</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $ 25 million scheduled to expire in november 2018 . the credit facility allows entergy new orleans to issue letters of credit against $ 10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility . in addition , entergy new orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . a0 as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 1.4 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy new orleans 2019s letter of credit a0facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy new orleans obtained authorization from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 150 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings and securities issuances . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized not only by the ferc , but also by the city council , and the current city council authorization extends through june 2018 . entergy new orleans , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy new orleans charges for electricity and natural gas significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy new orleans is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the city council , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . retail rates see 201calgiers asset transfer 201d below for discussion of the algiers asset transfer . as a provision of the settlement agreement approved by the city council in may 2015 providing for the algiers asset transfer , it was agreed that , with limited exceptions , no action may be taken with respect to entergy new orleans 2019s base rates until rates are implemented .\nQuestion: what was the 2017 value of receivables from the money pool?\nAnswer: 12723.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2016?\nAnswer: 14215.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "26938.0" } ]
CONVFINQA88	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>total cumulative return</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>edwards lifesciences</td><td>$ 127.54</td><td>$ 93.01</td><td>$ 180.17</td><td>$ 223.42</td><td>$ 265.06</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment index</td><td>117.42</td><td>150.28</td><td>181.96</td><td>194.37</td><td>207.46</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the value of an investment in edwards lifesciences in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "265.06" } ]
CONVFINQA7649	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\na significant portion of our natural gas production in the lower 48 states of the u.s . is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas . average settlement date henry hub natural gas prices have been relatively stable for the periods of this report ; however , a decline began in september 2011 which has continued in 2012 with february averaging $ 2.68 per mmbtu . should u.s . natural gas prices remain depressed , an impairment charge related to our natural gas assets may be necessary . our other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and eg . natural gas prices in europe have been significantly higher than in the u.s . in the case of eg our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices less volatile . the natural gas sales from eg are at fixed prices ; therefore , our worldwide reported average natural gas realized prices may not fully track market price movements . oil sands mining osm segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil we produce . roughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select . output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mines or the upgrader . the operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime . per-unit costs are sensitive to production rates . key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian alberta energy company ( 201caeco 201d ) natural gas sales index and crude oil prices , respectively . recently aeco prices have declined , much as henry hub prices have . we would expect a significant , continued declined in natural gas prices to have a favorable impact on osm operating costs . the table below shows average benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 95.11</td><td>$ 79.61</td><td>$ 62.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a )</td><td>77.97</td><td>65.31</td><td>52.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b )</td><td>$ 3.68</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 3.49</td></tr></table> wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) $ 95.11 $ 79.61 $ 62.09 western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a ) 77.97 65.31 52.13 aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b ) $ 3.68 $ 3.89 $ 3.49 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada . ( b ) monthly average day ahead index . integrated gas our integrated gas operations include production and marketing of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in eg . world lng trade in 2011 has been estimated to be 241 mmt . long-term , lng continues to be in demand as markets seek the benefits of clean burning natural gas . market prices for lng are not reported or posted . in general , lng delivered to the u.s . is tied to henry hub prices and will track with changes in u.s . natural gas prices , while lng sold in europe and asia is indexed to crude oil prices and will track the movement of those prices . we have a 60 percent ownership in an lng production facility in equatorial guinea , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . gross sales from the plant were 4.1 mmt , 3.7 mmt and 3.9 mmt in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . we own a 45 percent interest in a methanol plant located in equatorial guinea through our investment in ampco . gross sales of methanol from the plant totaled 1039657 , 850605 and 960374 metric tonnes in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . methanol demand has a direct impact on ampco 2019s earnings . because global demand for methanol is rather limited , changes in the supply-demand balance can have a significant impact on sales prices . world demand for methanol in 2011 has been estimated to be 55.4 mmt . our plant capacity of 1.1 mmt is about 2 percent of total demand . operating and financial highlights significant operating and financial highlights during 2011 include : 2022 completed the spin-off of our downstream business on june 30 , 2011 2022 acquired a significant operated position in the eagle ford shale play in south texas 2022 added net proved reserves , for the e&p and osm segments combined , of 307 mmboe , excluding dispositions , for a 212 percent reserve replacement ratio .\nQuestion: what was the price of wti crude oil in 2011?\nAnswer: 95.11\nQuestion: what was the price of wti crude oil in 2009?\nAnswer: 62.09\nQuestion: what is the difference between the price of wti crude oil from 2009 to 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "33.02" } ]
CONVFINQA2802	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naffiliated company . the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc . the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company . during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india . cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment . in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million . tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen . the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million . with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 . approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no . 142 and ceased amortization of goodwill . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million . the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 . songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas . the sale is expected to close in early 2003 . see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction . the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 6147</td><td>$ 6241</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>695</td><td>1717</td><td>1989</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>229</td><td>650</td><td>859</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>1097</td><td>3700</td><td>2423</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>6751</td><td>14942</td><td>13080</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>1418</td><td>3510</td><td>3370</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>3349</td><td>8297</td><td>5927</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>3081</td><td>6835</td><td>6206</td></tr></table> in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 . the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively . the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the value of revenues in 2002?\nAnswer: 2832.0\nQuestion: what was the value of revenues in 2001?\nAnswer: 6147.0\nQuestion: what is the net difference in revenues?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-3315.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7869	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe changes in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended december 29 , 2007 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 337226</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross amount of the decreases in unrecognized tax benefits of tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-31608 ( 31608 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross amount of the increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>7764</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amount of decreases in unrecognized tax benefits relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-6001 ( 6001 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions to unrecognized tax benefits resulting from the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-511 ( 511 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 29 2007</td><td>$ 306870</td></tr></table> as of december 29 , 2007 , $ 228.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits would , if recognized , reduce the effective tax rate , as compared to $ 232.1 million as of december 31 , 2006 , the first day of cadence 2019s fiscal year . the total amounts of interest and penalties recognized in the consolidated income statement for the year ended december 29 , 2007 resulted in net tax benefits of $ 11.1 million and $ 0.4 million , respectively , primarily due to the effective settlement of tax audits during the year . the total amounts of gross accrued interest and penalties recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of december 29 , 2007 , were $ 47.9 million and $ 9.7 million , respectively as compared to $ 65.8 million and $ 10.1 million , respectively as of december 31 , 2006 . note 9 . acquisitions for each of the acquisitions described below , the results of operations and the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been included in cadence 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition . comparative pro forma financial information for all 2007 , 2006 and 2005 acquisitions have not been presented because the results of operations were not material to cadence 2019s consolidated financial statements . 2007 acquisitions during 2007 , cadence acquired invarium , inc. , a san jose-based developer of advanced lithography-modeling and pattern-synthesis technology , and clear shape technologies , inc. , a san jose-based design for manufacturing technology company specializing in design-side solutions to minimize yield loss for advanced semiconductor integrated circuits . cadence acquired these two companies for an aggregate purchase price of $ 75.5 million , which included the payment of cash , the fair value of assumed options and acquisition costs . the $ 45.7 million of goodwill recorded in connection with these acquisitions is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes . prior to acquiring clear shape technologies , inc. , cadence had an investment of $ 2.0 million in the company , representing a 12% ( 12 % ) ownership interest , which had been accounted for under the cost method of accounting . in accordance with sfas no . 141 , 201cbusiness combinations , 201d cadence accounted for this acquisition as a step acquisition . subsequent adjustments to the purchase price of these acquired companies are included in the 201cother 201d line of the changes of goodwill table in note 10 below . 2006 acquisition in march 2006 , cadence acquired a company for an aggregate initial purchase price of $ 25.8 million , which included the payment of cash , the fair value of assumed options and acquisition costs . the preliminary allocation of the purchase price was recorded as $ 17.4 million of goodwill , $ 9.4 million of identifiable intangible assets and $ ( 1.0 ) million of net liabilities . the $ 17.4 million of goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes . subsequent adjustments to the purchase price of this acquired company are included in the 201cother 201d line of the changes of goodwill table in note 10 below. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the gross accrued interest from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: -17.9\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to the gross accrued interest in 2006, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.27204" } ]
CONVFINQA3911	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders . the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>pension and other postretirement items net of tax</td><td>effective financial derivatives net of tax</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2004</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ -126.3 ( 126.3 )</td><td>$ 10.6</td><td>$ 33.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005 change</td><td>-74.3 ( 74.3 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td><td>-16.0 ( 16.0 )</td><td>-133.9 ( 133.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2005</td><td>74.6</td><td>-169.9 ( 169.9 )</td><td>-5.4 ( 5.4 )</td><td>-100.7 ( 100.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2006 change</td><td>57.2</td><td>55.9</td><td>6.0</td><td>119.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>131.8</td><td>-161.9 ( 161.9 )</td><td>0.6</td><td>-29.5 ( 29.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 change</td><td>90.0</td><td>57.9</td><td>-11.5 ( 11.5 )</td><td>136.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 221.8</td><td>$ -104.0 ( 104.0 )</td><td>$ -10.9 ( 10.9 )</td><td>$ 106.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss . the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting . notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 . stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no . 123 and supersedes apb opinion no . 25 . the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants . the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings . upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .\nQuestion: what was the value of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) at the end of 2006?\nAnswer: -29.5\nQuestion: what was the value of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) at the end of 2005?\nAnswer: -100.7\nQuestion: what is the 2006 value less the 2005?\nAnswer: 71.2\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.70705" } ]
CONVFINQA5590	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nequity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2015 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1424356 $ 33.90 4281952 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1424356</td><td>$ 33.90</td><td>4281952</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1424356</td><td>$ 33.90</td><td>4281952</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2012 plan\" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2011 plan\" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 533397 were subject to stock options and 54191 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 35553 stock rights , 10279 restricted stock rights , and 790936 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 533397 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .\nQuestion: what is the total number of shares of equity compensation plans approved by security holders?\nAnswer: 5706308.0\nQuestion: what is the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?\nAnswer: 4281952.0\nQuestion: what proportion does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.75039" } ]
CONVFINQA3699	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncash and cash equivalents cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased . accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at the invoiced amounts , less an allowance for doubtful accounts , and generally do not bear interest . the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates . the company 2019s estimates include separately providing for customer receivables based on specific circumstances and credit conditions , and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible . account balances are written off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered . the company 2019s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of $ 15 million , $ 14 million and $ 15 million as of december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales as a reduction . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 67.6</td><td>$ 75.3</td><td>$ 77.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>bad debt expense</td><td>17.1</td><td>20.1</td><td>25.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs</td><td>-15.7 ( 15.7 )</td><td>-24.6 ( 24.6 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( a )</td><td>2.5</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td><td>-6.1 ( 6.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 71.5</td><td>$ 67.6</td><td>$ 75.3</td></tr></table> ( a ) other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits . inventory valuations inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value . certain u.s . inventory costs are determined on a last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) basis . lifo inventories represented 39% ( 39 % ) and 40% ( 40 % ) of consolidated inventories as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . all other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) methods . inventory values at fifo , as shown in note 5 , approximate replacement cost . property , plant and equipment property , plant and equipment assets are stated at cost . merchandising and customer equipment consists principally of various dispensing systems for the company 2019s cleaning and sanitizing products , dishwashing machines and process control and monitoring equipment . certain dispensing systems capitalized by the company are accounted for on a mass asset basis , whereby equipment is capitalized and depreciated as a group and written off when fully depreciated . the company capitalizes both internal and external costs of development or purchase of computer software for internal use . costs incurred for data conversion , training and maintenance associated with capitalized software are expensed as incurred . expenditures for major renewals and improvements , which significantly extend the useful lives of existing plant and equipment , are capitalized and depreciated . expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred . upon retirement or disposition of plant and equipment , the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in income . depreciation is charged to operations using the straight-line method over the assets 2019 estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 40 years for buildings and leasehold improvements , 3 to 20 years for machinery and equipment , 3 to 15 years for merchandising and customer equipment and 3 to 7 years for capitalized software . the straight-line method of depreciation reflects an appropriate allocation of the cost of the assets to earnings in proportion to the amount of economic benefits obtained by the company in each reporting period . depreciation expense was $ 586 million , $ 561 million and $ 560 million for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from 2016 to 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.9" } ]
CONVFINQA8466	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npackaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2006 4 . stock-based compensation ( continued ) same period was $ 1988000 lower , than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under apb no . 25 . basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended december 31 , 2006 were both $ 0.02 lower than if the company had continued to account for share-based compensation under apb no . 25 . prior to the adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the company presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from share-based payment arrangements as operating cash flows in the statements of cash flows . sfas no . 123 ( r ) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those share awards ( excess tax benefits ) to be classified as financing cash flows . the excess tax benefit of $ 2885000 classified as a financing cash inflow for the year ended december 31 , 2006 would have been classified as an operating cash inflow if the company had not adopted sfas no . 123 ( r ) . as a result of adopting sfas no 123 ( r ) , unearned compensation previously recorded in stockholders 2019 equity was reclassified against additional paid in capital on january 1 , 2006 . all stock-based compensation expense not recognized as of december 31 , 2005 and compensation expense related to post 2005 grants of stock options and amortization of restricted stock will be recorded directly to additional paid in capital . compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock recognized in the statements of income for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 was as follows : year ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2006</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2005</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>stock options</td><td>$ -3273 ( 3273 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restricted stock</td><td>-2789 ( 2789 )</td><td>-1677 ( 1677 )</td><td>-663 ( 663 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impact on income before income taxes</td><td>-6062 ( 6062 )</td><td>-1677 ( 1677 )</td><td>-663 ( 663 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>2382</td><td>661</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>impact on net income</td><td>$ -3680 ( 3680 )</td><td>$ -1016 ( 1016 )</td><td>$ -403 ( 403 )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: in the year of 2006, what was the stock options expense?\nAnswer: 3273.0\nQuestion: and what was the restricted stock expense?\nAnswer: 2789.0\nQuestion: which expense, then, was greater in that year?\nAnswer: yes\nQuestion: and in the previous year, what was the impact on net income due to those two expenses?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1016.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1791	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) operating income increased during 2017 when compared to 2016 , comprised of a decrease in revenue of $ 42.1 , as discussed above , a decrease in salaries and related expenses of $ 28.0 and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 16.9 . the decrease in salaries and related expenses was primarily due to lower discretionary bonuses and incentive expense as well as a decrease in base salaries , benefits and tax . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to decreases in adjustments to contingent acquisition obligations , as compared to the prior year . operating income increased during 2016 when compared to 2015 due to an increase in revenue of $ 58.8 , as discussed above , and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 3.7 , partially offset by an increase in salaries and related expenses of $ 38.8 . the increase in salaries and related expenses was attributable to an increase in base salaries , benefits and tax primarily due to increases in our workforce to support business growth over the last twelve months . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to lower production expenses related to pass-through costs , which are also reflected in revenue , for certain projects in which we acted as principal that decreased in size or did not recur during the current year . corporate and other certain corporate and other charges are reported as a separate line item within total segment operating income and include corporate office expenses , as well as shared service center and certain other centrally managed expenses that are not fully allocated to operating divisions . salaries and related expenses include salaries , long-term incentives , annual bonuses and other miscellaneous benefits for corporate office employees . office and general expenses primarily include professional fees related to internal control compliance , financial statement audits and legal , information technology and other consulting services that are engaged and managed through the corporate office . office and general expenses also include rental expense and depreciation of leasehold improvements for properties occupied by corporate office employees . a portion of centrally managed expenses are allocated to operating divisions based on a formula that uses the planned revenues of each of the operating units . amounts allocated also include specific charges for information technology-related projects , which are allocated based on utilization . corporate and other expenses decreased during 2017 by $ 20.6 to $ 126.6 compared to 2016 , primarily due to lower annual incentive expense . corporate and other expenses increased during 2016 by $ 5.4 to $ 147.2 compared to 2015 . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 887.3</td><td>$ 1023.2</td><td>$ 848.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital2</td><td>-29.9 ( 29.9 )</td><td>-414.9 ( 414.9 )</td><td>-99.9 ( 99.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities</td><td>24.4</td><td>-95.5 ( 95.5 )</td><td>-60.4 ( 60.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 881.8</td><td>$ 512.8</td><td>$ 688.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-196.2 ( 196.2 )</td><td>-263.9 ( 263.9 )</td><td>-199.7 ( 199.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-1004.9 ( 1004.9 )</td><td>-666.4 ( 666.4 )</td><td>-490.9 ( 490.9 )</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , net losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities due to the seasonality of our business , we typically use cash from working capital in the first nine months of a year , with the largest impact in the first quarter , and generate cash from working capital in the fourth quarter , driven by the seasonally strong media spending by our clients . quarterly and annual working capital results are impacted by the fluctuating annual media spending budgets of our clients as well as their changing media spending patterns throughout each year across various countries. .\nQuestion: what was the sum of cash provided by operating activities and cash used in investing activities?\nAnswer: 685.6\nQuestion: what was the value of cash used in financing activities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-1004.9" } ]
CONVFINQA1359	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe weighted average fair value of options granted during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was estimated to be $ 7.84 , $ 7.18 and $ 3.84 , respectively , using the black-scholes option pricing model with the assumptions below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free interest rate</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility</td><td>35.6% ( 35.6 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>26.0% ( 26.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected life ( years )</td><td>4.4</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.3</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards is $ 129.3 million and $ 93.5 million , respectively , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.7 years as of both year ends . the company granted a total of 1.5 million restricted stock awards at prices ranging from $ 25.76 to $ 28.15 on various dates in 2010 . these awards vest annually over three years . the company also granted 0.9 million performance restricted stock units during 2010 . these performance restricted stock units have been granted at the maximum achievable level and the number of shares that can vest is based on specific revenue and ebitda goals for periods from 2010 through 2012 . during 2009 , we granted 0.5 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 22.55 that vest annually over 3 years . on october 1 , 2009 , the company granted 0.4 million restricted stock units at a price of $ 24.85 per share that vested over six months . on march 20 , 2008 , we granted 0.4 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 38.75 that were to vest quarterly over 2 years . on july 2 , 2008 , 0.2 million of these shares were canceled and assumed by lps . the remaining unvested restricted shares were converted by the conversion factor of 1.7952 . these awards vested as of october 1 , 2009 , under the change in control provisions due to the metavante acquisition . on october 27 , 2008 , we granted 0.8 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 14.35 that vest annually over 3 years . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , we have approximately 2.2 million and 1.4 million unvested restricted shares remaining . as of december 31 , 2010 we also have 0.6 million of restricted stock units that have not vested . share repurchase plans on october 25 , 2006 , our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to $ 200.0 million worth of our common stock ( the 201cold plan 201d ) . on april 17 , 2008 , our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to an additional $ 250.0 million worth of our common stock ( the 201cnew plan 201d ) . under the new plan we repurchased 5.8 million shares of our stock for $ 226.2 million , at an average price of $ 38.97 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we also repurchased an additional 0.2 million shares of our stock for $ 10.0 million at an average price of $ 40.56 under the old plan . during 2007 , the company repurchased 1.6 million shares at an average price of $ 49.15 under the old plan . on february 4 , 2010 our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to 15.0 million shares of our common stock in the open market , at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions , through january 31 , 2013 . we repurchased 1.4 million shares of our common stock for $ 32.2 million , at an average price of $ 22.97 through march 31 , 2010 . no additional shares were repurchased under this plan during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . approximately 13.6 million shares of our common stock remain available to repurchase under this plan as of december 31 , 2010 . on may 25 , 2010 , our board of directors authorized a leveraged recapitalization plan to repurchase up to $ 2.5 billion of our common stock at a price range of $ 29.00 2014 $ 31.00 per share of common stock through a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer ( the 201ctender offer 201d ) . the tender offer commenced on july 6 , 2010 and expired on august 3 , 2010 . the tender offer was oversubscribed at $ 29.00 , resulting in the purchase of 86.2 million shares , including 6.4 million shares underlying previously unexercised stock options . the repurchased shares were added to treasury stock . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) %%transmsg* transmitting job : g26369 pcn : 087000000 *%%pcmsg\|87 \|00008\|yes\|no\|03/28/2011 17:32\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n\| .\nQuestion: what was the change in the fair value of the options from 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: 0.66\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of that fair value in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.09192" } ]
CONVFINQA2012	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother off-balance sheet commitments lease commitments the company leases various equipment and facilities , including retail space , under noncancelable operating lease arrangements . the company does not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements . the major facility leases are typically for terms not exceeding 10 years and generally provide renewal options for terms not exceeding five additional years . leases for retail space are for terms ranging from five to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 4.4 billion , of which $ 3.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 488 million , $ 338 million and $ 271 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2012 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 516</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>542</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>486</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1801</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 4414</td></tr></table> other commitments as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 21.1 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 988 million as of september 29 , 2012 , which were comprised mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated , certain of which are discussed in part i , item 3 of this form 10-k under the heading 201clegal proceedings 201d and in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors . 201d in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . vs samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment and may be subject to appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended september 29 , 2012. .\nQuestion: what was the rent expense for 2011?\nAnswer: 338.0\nQuestion: and in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "271.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9076	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2002</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>94.20</td><td>91.94</td><td>94.48</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>129.77</td><td>108.79</td><td>115.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>193.30</td><td>117.75</td><td>116.29</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>260.35</td><td>127.92</td><td>117.14</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>224.24</td><td>157.08</td><td>144.11</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of global payments from 2003 to 2004?\nAnswer: 35.57\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.3776" } ]
CONVFINQA10421	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 59 consolidated results of operations this following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . factors that related primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment . for a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations , see pages 149 2013 154 of this annual report . revenue year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment banking fees</td><td>$ 6190</td><td>$ 7087</td><td>$ 5526</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>principal transactions</td><td>10894</td><td>9796</td><td>-10699 ( 10699 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lending- and deposit-related fees</td><td>6340</td><td>7045</td><td>5088</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset management administrationand commissions</td><td>13499</td><td>12540</td><td>13943</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>securities gains</td><td>2965</td><td>1110</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>mortgage fees and related income</td><td>3870</td><td>3678</td><td>3467</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>credit card income</td><td>5891</td><td>7110</td><td>7419</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other income</td><td>2044</td><td>916</td><td>2169</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noninterest revenue</td><td>51693</td><td>49282</td><td>28473</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net interest income</td><td>51001</td><td>51152</td><td>38779</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net revenue</td><td>$ 102694</td><td>$ 100434</td><td>$ 67252</td></tr></table> 2010 compared with 2009 total net revenue for 2010 was $ 102.7 billion , up by $ 2.3 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from 2009 . results for 2010 were driven by a higher level of securities gains and private equity gains in corporate/private equity , higher asset management fees in am and administration fees in tss , and higher other income in several businesses , partially offset by lower credit card income . investment banking fees decreased from 2009 due to lower equity underwriting and advisory fees , partially offset by higher debt underwriting fees . competitive markets combined with flat industry-wide equity underwriting and completed m&a volumes , resulted in lower equity underwriting and advisory fees ; while strong industry-wide loan syndication and high-yield bond volumes drove record debt underwriting fees in ib . for additional information on investment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see ib segment results on pages 69 201371 of this annual report . principal transactions revenue , which consists of revenue from the firm 2019s trading and private equity investing activities , increased compared with 2009 . this was driven by the private equity business , which had significant private equity gains in 2010 , compared with a small loss in 2009 , reflecting improvements in market conditions . trading revenue decreased , reflecting lower results in corporate , offset by higher revenue in ib primarily reflecting gains from the widening of the firm 2019s credit spread on certain structured and derivative liabilities . for additional information on principal transactions revenue , see ib and corporate/private equity segment results on pages 69 201371 and 89 2013 90 , respectively , and note 7 on pages 199 2013200 of this annual report . lending- and deposit-related fees decreased in 2010 from 2009 levels , reflecting lower deposit-related fees in rfs associated , in part , with newly-enacted legislation related to non-sufficient funds and overdraft fees ; this was partially offset by higher lending- related service fees in ib , primarily from growth in business volume , and in cb , primarily from higher commitment and letter-of-credit fees . for additional information on lending- and deposit-related fees , which are mostly recorded in ib , rfs , cb and tss , see segment results for ib on pages 69 201371 , rfs on pages 72 201378 , cb on pages 82 201383 and tss on pages 84 201385 of this annual report . asset management , administration and commissions revenue increased from 2009 . the increase largely reflected higher asset management fees in am , driven by the effect of higher market levels , net inflows to products with higher margins and higher performance fees ; and higher administration fees in tss , reflecting the effects of higher market levels and net inflows of assets under custody . this increase was partially offset by lower brokerage commissions in ib , as a result of lower market volumes . for additional information on these fees and commissions , see the segment discussions for am on pages 86 201388 and tss on pages 84 201385 of this annual report . securities gains were significantly higher in 2010 compared with 2009 , resulting primarily from the repositioning of the portfolio in response to changes in the interest rate environment and to rebalance exposure . for additional information on securities gains , which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s corporate segment , see the corporate/private equity segment discussion on pages 89 201390 of this annual report . mortgage fees and related income increased in 2010 compared with 2009 , driven by higher mortgage production revenue , reflecting increased mortgage origination volumes in rfs and am , and wider margins , particularly in rfs . this increase was largely offset by higher repurchase losses in rfs ( recorded as contra- revenue ) , which were attributable to higher estimated losses related to repurchase demands , predominantly from gses . for additional information on mortgage fees and related income , which is recorded primarily in rfs , see rfs 2019s mortgage banking , auto & other consumer lending discussion on pages 74 201377 of this annual report . for additional information on repurchase losses , see the repurchase liability discussion on pages 98 2013101 and note 30 on pages 275 2013280 of this annual report . credit card income decreased during 2010 , predominantly due to the impact of the accounting guidance related to vies , effective january 1 , 2010 , that required the firm to consolidate the assets and liabilities of its firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts . adoption of the new guidance resulted in the elimination of all servicing fees received from firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts ( which was offset by related increases in net .\nQuestion: what portion ot total net revenue is generated by noninterest revenue\tin 2009?\nAnswer: 0.49069\nQuestion: what is the noninterest revenue in 2010?\nAnswer: 51693.0\nQuestion: what about the total net revenue?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "102694.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3186	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 30 , 2010 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 21871</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>12322</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>9078</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>6381</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>5422</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>30655</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 85729</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees in 2010?\nAnswer: 11.7\nQuestion: what was the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees in 2009?\nAnswer: 10.9\nQuestion: what is the net change for the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.8" } ]
CONVFINQA5509	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ngenerate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td><td>$ 6161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-1632 ( 1632 )</td><td>-1333 ( 1333 )</td><td>-1146 ( 1146 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 1504</td><td>$ 2085</td><td>$ 1382</td></tr></table> 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments . we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network . f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability . f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices . we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months . lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport . alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments . f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives . the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s . economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace . one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities . on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year . in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .\nQuestion: what was free cash flow in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1504.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1162	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .\nQuestion: what was the difference between the share price of ventas between 12/31/02 and 12/31/03?\nAnswer: 106.0\nQuestion: and the growth rate during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.06" } ]
CONVFINQA2831	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndecember 31 , 2018 . alcoa corporation will supply all required raw materials to arconic and arconic will process the raw materials into finished can sheet coils ready for shipment to the end customer . tolling revenue for the two months ended december 31 , 2016 was approximately $ 37 million . in 2017 , demand in the automotive end market is expected to continue to grow due to the growing demand for innovative products and aluminum-intensive vehicles . demand from the commercial airframe end market is expected to be flat in 2017 as the ramp up of new programs is offset by customer destocking and lower build rates for aluminum intensive wide-body programs . sales to the packaging market are expected to decline due to continuing pricing pressure within this market and the ramp-down of the north american packaging operations . net productivity improvements are anticipated to continue . engineered products and solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 5728</td><td>$ 5342</td><td>$ 4217</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 642</td><td>$ 595</td><td>$ 579</td></tr></table> the engineered products and solutions segment produces products that are used primarily in the aerospace ( commercial and defense ) , commercial transportation , and power generation end markets . such products include fastening systems ( titanium , steel , and nickel superalloys ) and seamless rolled rings ( mostly nickel superalloys ) ; investment castings ( nickel superalloys , titanium , and aluminum ) , including airfoils and forged jet engine components ( e.g. , jet engine disks ) , and extruded , machined and formed aircraft parts ( titanium and aluminum ) , all of which are sold directly to customers and through distributors . more than 75% ( 75 % ) of the third-party sales in this segment are from the aerospace end market . a small part of this segment also produces various forged , extruded , and machined metal products ( titanium , aluminum and steel ) for the oil and gas , industrial products , automotive , and land and sea defense end markets . seasonal decreases in sales are generally experienced in the third quarter of the year due to the european summer slowdown across all end markets . generally , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , british pound and the euro . in july 2015 , arconic completed the acquisition of rti , a global supplier of titanium and specialty metal products and services for the commercial aerospace , defense , energy , and medical device end markets . the purpose of the acquisition was to expand arconic 2019s range of titanium offerings and add advanced technologies and materials , primarily related to the aerospace end market . in 2014 , rti generated net sales of $ 794 and had approximately 2600 employees . the operating results and assets and liabilities of rti have been included within the engineered products and solutions segment since the date of acquisition . in march 2015 , arconic completed the acquisition of tital , a privately held aerospace castings company with approximately 650 employees based in germany . tital produces aluminum and titanium investment casting products for the aerospace and defense end markets . in 2014 , tital generated sales of approximately $ 100 . the purpose of the acquisition was to capture increasing demand for advanced jet engine components made of titanium , establish titanium- casting capabilities in europe , and expand existing aluminum casting capacity . the operating results and assets and liabilities of tital have been included within the engineered products and solutions segment since the date of acquisition . in november 2014 , arconic completed the acquisition of firth rixson , a global leader in aerospace jet engine components . firth rixson manufactures rings , forgings , and metal products for the aerospace end market , as well as other markets requiring highly-engineered material applications . the purpose of the acquisition was to strengthen arconic 2019s aerospace business and position the company to capture additional aerospace growth with a broader range of high-growth , value-add jet engine components . firth rixson generated sales of approximately $ 970 in 2014 and had 13 operating facilities in the united states , united kingdom , europe , and asia employing approximately 2400 people combined . the operating results and assets and liabilities of firth rixson have been included within the engineered products and solutions segment since the date of acquisition. .\nQuestion: what was the total of third-party sales in the engineered products and solutions segment in the year of 2015?\nAnswer: 5342.0\nQuestion: and what percentage of this total was from aerospace end market sales?\nAnswer: 0.75\nQuestion: what was, then, the amount of those market sales?\nAnswer: 4006.5\nQuestion: and in the previous year of that one, what was the total of sales generated from firth rixson?\nAnswer: 970.0\nQuestion: and what was it for tital?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: how much, then, do the firth rixson sales represent in relation to the tital ones?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9.7" } ]
CONVFINQA6801	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portu- guese and latin american markets and although pullmantur has diversified its passenger sourcing over the past few years , spain still represents pullmantur 2019s largest market . as previously disclosed , during 2012 european economies continued to demonstrate insta- bility in light of heightened concerns over sovereign debt issues as well as the impact of proposed auster- ity measures on certain markets . the spanish econ- omy was more severely impacted than many other economies and there is significant uncertainty as to when it will recover . in addition , the impact of the costa concordia incident has had a more lingering effect than expected and the impact in future years is uncertain . these factors were identified in the past as significant risks which could lead to the impairment of pullmantur 2019s goodwill . more recently , the spanish economy has progressively worsened and forecasts suggest the challenging operating environment will continue for an extended period of time . the unemployment rate in spain reached 26% ( 26 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is expected to rise further in 2013 . the international monetary fund , which had projected gdp growth of 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) a year ago , revised its 2013 gdp projections downward for spain to a contraction of 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and further reduced it to a contraction of 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) in january of 2013 . during the latter half of 2012 new austerity measures , such as increases to the value added tax , cuts to benefits , the phasing out of exemptions and the suspension of government bonuses , were implemented by the spanish government . we believe these austerity measures are having a larger impact on consumer confidence and discretionary spending than previously anticipated . as a result , there has been a significant deterioration in bookings from guests sourced from spain during the 2013 wave season . the combination of all of these factors has caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the expectations regarding future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined the implied fair value of goodwill for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 million and rec- ognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . there have been no goodwill impairment charges related to the pullmantur reporting unit in prior periods . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) perform worse than contemplated in our discounted cash flow model , or if there are material changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impair- ment analyses , especially in net yields , an additional impairment charge of the pullmantur reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 218883</td><td>$ 225679</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>impairment charge</td><td>-17356 ( 17356 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>3339</td><td>-6796 ( 6796 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 204866</td><td>$ 218883</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of our trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . these trademarks and trade names relate to pullmantur and we have used a discount rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . as described in note 3 . goodwill , the continued deterioration of the spanish economy caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections for the pullmantur reporting unit , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the timing of future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined that the fair value of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names no longer exceeded their carrying value . accordingly , we recog- nized an impairment charge of approximately $ 17.4 million to write down trademarks and trade names to their fair value of $ 204.9 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) 0494.indd 76 3/27/13 12:53 pm .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the recognized impairment charge and the fair value of trademarks and trade names?\nAnswer: 222.3\nQuestion: what was the impairment charge?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "17.4" } ]
CONVFINQA2076	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries ; and 2022 sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies . subject to certain exceptions , the indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes permit the issuers of the notes and their restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness , including secured indebtedness . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . principal payments scheduled to be made on the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total ( in $ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1485</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter ( 1 )</td><td>1590</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>3498</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans in north america , europe and asia . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 84% ( 84 % ) and 76% ( 76 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . pension costs under the company 2019s retirement plans are actuarially determined . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in north america , europe , and asia covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . the company 2019s matching contribution to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and aggregated $ 11 million , $ 12 million , $ 8 million and $ 3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 and the three months ended march 31 , 2004 , respectively . celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what portion of the total principal payments is due after 2011?\nAnswer: 0.45455\nQuestion: what is the total principal payments as of march 31,2006?\nAnswer: 3498.0\nQuestion: what is the amount of principal payments due after 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1590.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1591	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 164 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report firm ) is required to hold more than the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) . the tier i common equity standard is effective from the first quarter of 2015 . the following chart presents the basel iii minimum risk-based capital ratios during the transitional periods and on a fully phased-in basis . the chart also includes management 2019s target for the firm 2019s tier 1 common ratio . it is the firm 2019s current expectation that its basel iii tier 1 common ratio will exceed the regulatory minimums , both during the transition period and upon full implementation in 2019 and thereafter . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under the basel iii advanced approach on a fully phased-in basis would be 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 , achieving management 2019s previously stated objectives . the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non-gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under the advanced approach of the basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . key differences in the calculation of rwa between basel i and basel iii advanced approach include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk- weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; and ( 2 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . operational risk capital takes into consideration operational losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized , and the calculation generally incorporates such losses irrespective of whether the issues or business activity giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced . the firm 2019s operational risk capital model continues to be refined in conjunction with the firm 2019s basel iii advanced approach parallel run . as a result of model enhancements in 2013 , as well as taking into consideration the legal expenses incurred by the firm in 2013 , the firm 2019s operational risk capital increased substantially in 2013 over 2012 . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( 201caoci 201d ) related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . december 31 , 2013 ( in millions , except ratios ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tier 1 common under basel i rules</td><td>$ 148887</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add back of basel i deductions ( a )</td><td>1780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deduction for deferred tax asset related to net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards</td><td>-741 ( 741 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>-198 ( 198 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules</td><td>$ 151202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b )</td><td>$ 1590873</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c )</td><td>9.5% ( 9.5 % )</td></tr></table> estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b ) $ 1590873 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c ) 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) ( a ) certain exposures , which are deducted from capital under basel i , are risked-weighted under basel iii. .\nQuestion: in december, 2013, how much did the estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach represent in relation to the estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules?\nAnswer: 10.52151\nQuestion: and as of that same date, what was the total of adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans?\nAnswer: 1474.0\nQuestion: what was that total for the add back of basel i deductions?\nAnswer: 1780.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the combined total for both segments?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3254.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7794	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders . the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>pension and other postretirement items net of tax</td><td>effective financial derivatives net of tax</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2004</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ -126.3 ( 126.3 )</td><td>$ 10.6</td><td>$ 33.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005 change</td><td>-74.3 ( 74.3 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td><td>-16.0 ( 16.0 )</td><td>-133.9 ( 133.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2005</td><td>74.6</td><td>-169.9 ( 169.9 )</td><td>-5.4 ( 5.4 )</td><td>-100.7 ( 100.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2006 change</td><td>57.2</td><td>55.9</td><td>6.0</td><td>119.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>131.8</td><td>-161.9 ( 161.9 )</td><td>0.6</td><td>-29.5 ( 29.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 change</td><td>90.0</td><td>57.9</td><td>-11.5 ( 11.5 )</td><td>136.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 221.8</td><td>$ -104.0 ( 104.0 )</td><td>$ -10.9 ( 10.9 )</td><td>$ 106.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss . the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting . notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 . stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no . 123 and supersedes apb opinion no . 25 . the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants . the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings . upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .\nQuestion: what was net tax expense related to the change in the pension and other postretirement items in 2007?\nAnswer: 31.3\nQuestion: and in 2006?\nAnswer: 2.9\nQuestion: what was the total value for these two years combined?\nAnswer: 34.2\nQuestion: and in 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "27.3" } ]
CONVFINQA9917	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2012 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 39 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest product principal interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interestonlyproduct</td><td>principalandinterestproduct</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 1338</td><td>$ 221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>2048</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>2024</td><td>654</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1571</td><td>504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>3075</td><td>697</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 and thereafter</td><td>5497</td><td>4825</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>$ 15553</td><td>$ 7376</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes approximately $ 166 million , $ 208 million , $ 213 million , $ 61 million , $ 70 million and $ 526 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2012 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.86% ( 3.86 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.96% ( 5.96 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 91 .\nQuestion: what percentage of the total of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods is represented by the ones scheduled to end in 2017?\nAnswer: 0.19771\nQuestion: and what is the value of the interest only products home equity lines that are scheduled to end in 2015?\nAnswer: 1338.0\nQuestion: what is that for 2014?\nAnswer: 2048.0\nQuestion: what is, then, the total value of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods scheduled to end in both years combined?\nAnswer: 3386.0\nQuestion: including 2013, what then becomes this total value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5410.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6579	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsynopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued purchase price allocation . the company allocated the total purchase consideration of $ 316.6 million ( including $ 4.6 million related to stock awards assumed ) to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , including acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 96.7 million and ipr&d of $ 13.2 million , resulting in total goodwill of $ 210.1 million . acquisition-related costs , consisting of professional services , severance costs , contract terminations and facilities closure costs , totaling $ 13.0 million were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations . goodwill primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the integration of virage 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations to provide an expansion of products and market reach . identifiable intangible assets consisted of technology , customer relationships , contract rights and trademarks , were valued using the income method , and are being amortized over two to ten years . fair value of stock awards assumed . the company assumed unvested restricted stock units ( rsus ) and stock appreciation rights ( sars ) with a fair value of $ 21.7 million . of the total consideration , $ 4.6 million was allocated to the purchase consideration and $ 17.1 million was allocated to future services and expensed over their remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . other fiscal 2010 acquisitions during fiscal 2010 , the company completed seven other acquisitions for cash . the company allocated the total purchase consideration of $ 221.7 million to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in total goodwill of $ 110.8 million . acquired identifiable intangible assets totaling $ 92.8 million are being amortized over their respective useful lives ranging from one to ten years . acquisition-related costs totaling $ 10.6 million were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations . the purchase consideration for one of the acquisitions included contingent consideration up to $ 10.0 million payable upon the achievement of certain technology milestones over three years . the contingent consideration was recorded as a liability at its estimated fair value determined based on the net present value of estimated payments of $ 7.8 million on the acquisition date and is being remeasured at fair value quarterly during the three-year contingency period with changes in its fair value recorded in the company 2019s statements of operations . there is no contingent consideration liability as of the end of fiscal 2012 relating to this acquisition . note 4 . goodwill and intangible assets goodwill consists of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at october 31 2010</td><td>$ 1265843</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions</td><td>30717</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other adjustments ( 1 )</td><td>-7274 ( 7274 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at october 31 2011</td><td>$ 1289286</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>additions</td><td>687195</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other adjustments ( 1 )</td><td>506</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at october 31 2012</td><td>$ 1976987</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) adjustments primarily relate to changes in estimates for acquisitions that closed in the prior fiscal year for which the purchase price allocation was still preliminary , and achievement of certain milestones for an acquisition that closed prior to fiscal 2010. .\nQuestion: for the year ended october 31, 2011, what was the net change in the goodwill and intangible assets balance, in thousands?\nAnswer: 23443.0\nQuestion: and for the year exactly precedent to this one, what was that net change in the balance?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "687701.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9848	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i item 1 . business . general development of business general : altria group , inc . is a holding company incorporated in the commonwealth of virginia in 1985 . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . 2019s wholly-owned subsidiaries included philip morris usa inc . ( 201cpm usa 201d ) , which is engaged predominantly in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes in the united states ; john middleton co . ( 201cmiddleton 201d ) , which is engaged in the manufacture and sale of machine-made large cigars and pipe tobacco , and is a wholly- owned subsidiary of pm usa ; and ust llc ( 201cust 201d ) , which through its wholly-owned subsidiaries , including u.s . smokeless tobacco company llc ( 201cusstc 201d ) and ste . michelle wine estates ltd . ( 201cste . michelle 201d ) , is engaged in the manufacture and sale of smokeless tobacco products and wine . altria group , inc . 2019s other operating companies included nu mark llc ( 201cnu mark 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary that is engaged in the manufacture and sale of innovative tobacco products , and philip morris capital corporation ( 201cpmcc 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary that maintains a portfolio of finance assets , substantially all of which are leveraged leases . other altria group , inc . wholly-owned subsidiaries included altria group distribution company , which provides sales , distribution and consumer engagement services to certain altria group , inc . operating subsidiaries , and altria client services inc. , which provides various support services , such as legal , regulatory , finance , human resources and external affairs , to altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . also held approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of the economic and voting interest of sabmiller plc ( 201csabmiller 201d ) , which altria group , inc . accounts for under the equity method of accounting . source of funds : because altria group , inc . is a holding company , its access to the operating cash flows of its wholly- owned subsidiaries consists of cash received from the payment of dividends and distributions , and the payment of interest on intercompany loans by its subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . 2019s principal wholly-owned subsidiaries were not limited by long-term debt or other agreements in their ability to pay cash dividends or make other distributions with respect to their equity interests . in addition , altria group , inc . receives cash dividends on its interest in sabmiller if and when sabmiller pays such dividends . financial information about segments altria group , inc . 2019s reportable segments are smokeable products , smokeless products and wine . the financial services and the innovative tobacco products businesses are included in an all other category due to the continued reduction of the lease portfolio of pmcc and the relative financial contribution of altria group , inc . 2019s innovative tobacco products businesses to altria group , inc . 2019s consolidated results . altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker reviews operating companies income to evaluate the performance of , and allocate resources to , the segments . operating companies income for the segments is defined as operating income before amortization of intangibles and general corporate expenses . interest and other debt expense , net , and provision for income taxes are centrally managed at the corporate level and , accordingly , such items are not presented by segment since they are excluded from the measure of segment profitability reviewed by altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker . net revenues and operating companies income ( together with a reconciliation to earnings before income taxes ) attributable to each such segment for each of the last three years are set forth in note 15 . segment reporting to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data of this annual report on form 10-k ( 201citem 8 201d ) . information about total assets by segment is not disclosed because such information is not reported to or used by altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker . segment goodwill and other intangible assets , net , are disclosed in note 4 . goodwill and other intangible assets , net to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 4 201d ) . the accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in note 2 . summary of significant accounting policies to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 2 201d ) . the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment and the all other category were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>smokeable products</td><td>87.2% ( 87.2 % )</td><td>84.5% ( 84.5 % )</td><td>83.7% ( 83.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smokeless products</td><td>13.4</td><td>12.2</td><td>12.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>wine</td><td>1.7</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> for items affecting the comparability of the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment , see note 15 . segment reporting to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 15 201d ) . narrative description of business portions of the information called for by this item are included in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations - operating results by business segment of this annual report on form 10-k . tobacco space altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies include pm usa , usstc and other subsidiaries of ust , middleton and nu mark . altria group distribution company provides sales , distribution and consumer engagement services to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies . the products of altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco subsidiaries include smokeable tobacco products comprised of cigarettes manufactured and sold by pm usa and machine-made large altria_mdc_2014form10k_nolinks_crops.pdf 3 2/25/15 5:56 pm .\nQuestion: what is the net change in income for smokeless product, relative to total income, from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: -0.3\nQuestion: what was the 2012 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12.5" } ]
CONVFINQA9082	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nproperty investmentp yrr our overall strategy is to continue to increase our investment in quality industrial properties in both existing and select new markets and to continue to increase our investment in on-campus or hospital affiliated medical offf fice ff properties . pursuant to this strategy , we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon our market yy outlook , including general economic conditions , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon identifying suitable acquisition and development opportunities , and our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity , including issuances of debt or equity securities as well asyy generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . leasing/capital costsg p tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant tt space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within \"development of real estate investments\" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within \"other deferred leasing costs.\" cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within \"development of real estate investments\" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as tt second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant , but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties , are also second generation expenditures . one of the principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure , as well as capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments and for other deferred leasing costs ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second generation tenant improvements</td><td>$ 24622</td><td>$ 28681</td><td>$ 51699</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second generation leasing costs</td><td>27029</td><td>24471</td><td>37898</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>7698</td><td>8748</td><td>9224</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total second generation capital expenditures</td><td>$ 59349</td><td>$ 61900</td><td>$ 98821</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development of real estate investments</td><td>$ 401442</td><td>$ 370466</td><td>$ 446722</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other deferred leasing costs</td><td>$ 38410</td><td>$ 30790</td><td>$ 31503</td></tr></table> second generation capital expenditures were significantly lower during 2016 and 2015 , compared to 2014 , as the result of significant dispositions of office properties , which were more capital intensive to re-lease than industrial ff properties . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of ww $ 713.1 million at december 31 , 2016 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 599.8 million and $ 470.2 million at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the capital expenditures in the table above include the capitalization of internal overhead costs . we capitalized ww $ 24.0 million , $ 21.7 million and $ 23.9 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we ww capitalized $ 25.9 million , $ 23.8 million and $ 28.8 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including both development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 33.5% ( 33.5 % ) , 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) and 31.4% ( 31.4 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found in the year-to-year comparisons of general and administrative expenses and critical accounting policies sections of this item 7. .\nQuestion: what were the total costs associated with development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space in the year of 2016?\nAnswer: 25.9\nQuestion: and what were they in 2014?\nAnswer: 28.8\nQuestion: what is, then, the total value of those costs in 2014 and 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "54.7" } ]
CONVFINQA4264	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 15 . exhibits , financial statement schedules . ( continued ) kinder morgan , inc . form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>kinder morgan liquids terminals llc-n.j . development revenue bonds due january 15 2018 kinder morgan columbus llc-5.50% ( llc-5.50 % ) ms development revenue note due september 1 2022</td><td>25.0 8.2</td><td>25.0 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kinder morgan operating l.p . 201cb 201d-jackson-union cos . il revenue bonds due april 1 2024</td><td>23.7</td><td>23.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international marine terminals-plaquemines la revenue bonds due march 15 2025</td><td>40.0</td><td>40.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other miscellaneous subsidiary debt</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unamortized debt discount on long-term debt</td><td>-20.3 ( 20.3 )</td><td>-21.2 ( 21.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-1263.3 ( 1263.3 )</td><td>-596.6 ( 596.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt 2013 kmp</td><td>$ 10282.8</td><td>$ 10007.5</td></tr></table> ____________ ( a ) as a result of the implementation of asu 2009-17 , effective january 1 , 2010 , we ( i ) include the transactions and balances of our business trust , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , in our consolidated financial statements and ( ii ) no longer include our junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued to the capital trusts ( see note 18 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d ) . ( b ) kmp issued its $ 500 million in principal amount of 9.00% ( 9.00 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2019 in december 2008 . each holder of the notes has the right to require kmp to repurchase all or a portion of the notes owned by such holder on february 1 , 2012 at a purchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes tendered by the holder plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the repurchase date . on and after february 1 , 2012 , interest will cease to accrue on the notes tendered for repayment . a holder 2019s exercise of the repurchase option is irrevocable . kinder morgan kansas , inc . the 2028 and 2098 debentures and the 2012 and 2015 senior notes are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . the 2027 debentures are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option after november 1 , 2004 at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . on september 2 , 2010 , kinder morgan kansas , inc . paid the remaining $ 1.1 million principal balance outstanding on kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) series debentures , due 2013 . kinder morgan finance company , llc on december 20 , 2010 , kinder morgan finance company , llc , a wholly owned subsidiary of kinder morgan kansas , inc. , completed a public offering of senior notes . it issued a total of $ 750 million in principal amount of 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) senior notes due january 15 , 2018 . net proceeds received from the issuance of the notes , after underwriting discounts and commissions , were $ 744.2 million , which were used to retire the principal amount of the 5.35% ( 5.35 % ) senior notes that matured on january 5 , 2011 . the 2011 , 2016 , 2018 and 2036 senior notes issued by kinder morgan finance company , llc are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . each series of these notes is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by kinder morgan kansas , inc . on a senior unsecured basis as to principal , interest and any additional amounts required to be paid as a result of any withholding or deduction for canadian taxes . capital trust securities kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s business trusts , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , are obligated for $ 12.7 million of 8.56% ( 8.56 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2027 and $ 14.4 million of 7.63% ( 7.63 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2028 , respectively , which it guarantees . the 2028 securities are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices as defined in the associated prospectus . the 2027 securities are redeemable in whole or in part at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option and at any time in certain limited circumstances upon the occurrence of certain events and at prices , all defined in the associated prospectus supplements . upon redemption by kinder morgan kansas , inc . or at maturity of the junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures , it must use the proceeds to make redemptions of the capital trust securities on a pro rata basis. .\nQuestion: what was the amount of the current maturities of long-term debt?\nAnswer: -1263.3\nQuestion: and what was the total long-term debt for the first column?\nAnswer: 10282.8\nQuestion: what was, then, that amount as a portion of this long-term debt?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.12286" } ]
CONVFINQA4426	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour operating cash flows are significantly impacted by the seasonality of our businesses . we typically generate most of our operating cash flow in the third and fourth quarters of each year . in june 2015 , we issued $ 900 million of senior notes in a registered public offering . the senior notes consist of two tranches : $ 400 million of five-year notes due 2020 with a coupon of 3% ( 3 % ) and $ 500 million of ten-year notes due 2025 with a coupon of 4% ( 4 % ) . we used the proceeds from the senior notes offering to pay down our revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes . on december 31 , 2017 , the outstanding amount of the senior notes , net of underwriting commissions and price discounts , was $ 892.6 million . cash flows below is a summary of cash flows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 600.3</td><td>$ 650.5</td><td>$ 429.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-287.7 ( 287.7 )</td><td>-385.1 ( 385.1 )</td><td>-766.6 ( 766.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities</td><td>-250.1 ( 250.1 )</td><td>-250.4 ( 250.4 )</td><td>398.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash</td><td>9.0</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>-14.8 ( 14.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net increase in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 71.5</td><td>$ 13.0</td><td>$ 46.6</td></tr></table> net cash provided by operating activities was $ 600.3 million in 2017 compared to $ 650.5 million in 2016 and $ 429.2 million in 2015 . the $ 50.2 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities from 2017 to 2016 was primarily due to higher build in working capital , primarily driven by higher inventory purchases in 2017 , partially offset by a higher net income . the $ 221.3 million increase in cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016 was primarily due to a reduction in working capital in 2016 compared to 2015 and higher net income . net cash used in investing activities was $ 287.7 million in 2017 compared to $ 385.1 million in 2016 and $ 766.6 million in 2015 . the decrease of $ 97.4 million from 2016 to 2017 was primarily due lower cost of acquisitions of $ 115.1 million , partially offset by $ 15.7 million of higher capital expenditures . the decrease of $ 381.5 million from 2015 to 2016 was primarily due the decrease in cost of acquisitions of $ 413.1 million , partially offset by $ 20.8 million of higher capital spending . net cash used in financing activities was $ 250.1 million in 2017 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 250.4 million in 2016 and net cash provided by in financing activities of $ 398.8 million in 2015 . the change of $ 649.2 million in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to $ 372.8 million of higher share repurchases and lower net borrowings of $ 240.8 million . pension plans subsidiaries of fortune brands sponsor their respective defined benefit pension plans that are funded by a portfolio of investments maintained within our benefit plan trust . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , we contributed $ 28.4 million , zero and $ 2.3 million , respectively , to qualified pension plans . in 2018 , we expect to make pension contributions of approximately $ 12.8 million . as of december 31 , 2017 , the fair value of our total pension plan assets was $ 656.6 million , representing funding of 79% ( 79 % ) of the accumulated benefit obligation liability . for the foreseeable future , we believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet the minimum funding that may be required by the pension protection act of 2006 . foreign exchange we have operations in various foreign countries , principally canada , china , mexico , the united kingdom , france , australia and japan . therefore , changes in the value of the related currencies affect our financial statements when translated into u.s . dollars. .\nQuestion: in 6/15, what percentage of the five-year notes due in 2020 had a coupon of 3%?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.44444" } ]
CONVFINQA1308	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements recognizing customer revenue , the company must assess the collectability of both the amounts billed and the portion recognized on a straight-line basis . this assessment takes customer credit risk and business and industry conditions into consideration to ultimately determine the collectability of the amounts billed . to the extent the amounts , based on management 2019s estimates , may not be collectible , recognition is deferred until such point as the uncertainty is resolved . any amounts which were previously recognized as revenue and subsequently determined to be uncollectible are charged to bad debt expense . accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts related to estimated losses resulting from a customer 2019s inability to make required payments and reserves for amounts invoiced whose collectability is not reasonably assured . these allowances are generally estimated based on payment patterns , days past due and collection history , and incorporate changes in economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical trends , such as customers in bankruptcy , liquidation or reorganization . receivables are written-off against the allowances when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1,</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td><td>$ 8850</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>16219</td><td>26771</td><td>12059</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recoveries and other</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td><td>-9733 ( 9733 )</td><td>-9427 ( 9427 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31,</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td></tr></table> the company 2019s largest international customer is iusacell , which is the brand name under which a group of companies controlled by grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201cgrupo iusacell 201d ) operates . iusacell represented approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the company 2019s total revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2010 . grupo iusacell has been engaged in a refinancing of a majority of its u.s . dollar denominated debt , and in connection with this process , two of the legal entities of the group , including grupo iusacell , voluntarily filed for a pre-packaged concurso mercantil ( a process substantially equivalent to chapter 11 of u.s . bankruptcy law ) with the backing of a majority of their financial creditors in december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , iusacell notes receivable , net , and related assets ( which include financing lease commitments and a deferred rent asset that are primarily long-term in nature ) were $ 19.7 million and $ 51.2 million , respectively . functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with its largest international customer , iusacell , which included , among other changes , converting all of iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company has determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional .\nQuestion: what was the net difference in the balance of allowances from 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: -6015.0\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.2109" } ]
CONVFINQA10457	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nabiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . goodwill and in-process research and development ( continued ) the company has no accumulated impairment losses on goodwill . the company performed a step 0 qualitative assessment during the annual impairment review for fiscal 2015 as of october 31 , 2014 and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the company 2019s single reporting unit is less than its carrying amount . therefore , the two-step goodwill impairment test for the reporting unit was not necessary in fiscal 2015 . as described in note 3 . 201cacquisitions , 201d in july 2014 , the company acquired ecp and ais and recorded $ 18.5 million of ipr&d . the estimated fair value of the ipr&d was determined using a probability-weighted income approach , which discounts expected future cash flows to present value . the projected cash flows from the expandable catheter pump technology were based on certain key assumptions , including estimates of future revenue and expenses , taking into account the stage of development of the technology at the acquisition date and the time and resources needed to complete development . the company used a discount rate of 22.5% ( 22.5 % ) and cash flows that have been probability adjusted to reflect the risks of product commercialization , which the company believes are appropriate and representative of market participant assumptions . the carrying value of the company 2019s ipr&d assets and the change in the balance for the year ended march 31 , 2015 is as follows : march 31 , ( in $ 000 2019s ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>march 31 2015 ( in $ 000 2019s )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions</td><td>18500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation impact</td><td>-3789 ( 3789 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 14711</td></tr></table> note 9 . stockholders 2019 equity class b preferred stock the company has authorized 1000000 shares of class b preferred stock , $ .01 par value , of which the board of directors can set the designation , rights and privileges . no shares of class b preferred stock have been issued or are outstanding . stock repurchase program in november 2012 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $ 15.0 million of its common stock . the company financed the stock repurchase program with its available cash . during the year ended march 31 , 2013 , the company repurchased 1123587 shares for $ 15.0 million in open market purchases at an average cost of $ 13.39 per share , including commission expense . the company completed the purchase of common stock under this stock repurchase program in january 2013 . note 10 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation stock award plans the company grants stock options and restricted stock awards to employees and others . all outstanding stock options of the company as of march 31 , 2015 were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant . outstanding stock options , if not exercised , expire 10 years from the date of grant . the company 2019s 2008 stock incentive plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) authorizes the grant of a variety of equity awards to the company 2019s officers , directors , employees , consultants and advisers , including awards of unrestricted and restricted stock , restricted stock units , incentive and nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of common stock , performance share awards and stock appreciation rights . the plan provides that options may only be granted at the current market value on the date of grant . each share of stock issued pursuant to a stock option or stock appreciation right counts as one share against the maximum number of shares issuable under the plan , while each share of stock issued .\nQuestion: what was the ending balance of ipr&d assets as of 12/31/15?\nAnswer: 14711.0\nQuestion: and the foreign currency translation impact?\nAnswer: 3789.0\nQuestion: considering this impact, what was the value of assets?\nAnswer: 10922.0\nQuestion: and converted into the millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "10922000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1572	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net loss as reported</td><td>$ -1141879 ( 1141879 )</td><td>$ -450094 ( 450094 )</td><td>$ -194628 ( 194628 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect</td><td>-38126 ( 38126 )</td><td>-50540 ( 50540 )</td><td>-51186 ( 51186 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pro-forma net loss</td><td>$ -1180005 ( 1180005 )</td><td>$ -500634 ( 500634 )</td><td>$ -245814 ( 245814 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported</td><td>$ -5.84 ( 5.84 )</td><td>$ -2.35 ( 2.35 )</td><td>$ -1.15 ( 1.15 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma</td><td>$ -6.04 ( 6.04 )</td><td>$ -2.61 ( 2.61 )</td><td>$ -1.46 ( 1.46 )</td></tr></table> fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively . fair values were determined based on quoted market prices . the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation . the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no . 143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs . the requirements of sfas no . 143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 . the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations . in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no . 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no . 144 supersedes sfas no . 121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions . sfas no . 144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no . 121 . in addition , sfas no . 144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no . 30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d . however , sfas no . 144 retains the requirement in apb no . 30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions . the scope of sfas no . 144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no . 142 . the company implemented sfas no . 144 on january 1 , 2002 . accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .\nQuestion: what was the value of contributions in 2002?\nAnswer: 979000.0\nQuestion: what was the value of contributions in 2001?\nAnswer: 1540000.0\nQuestion: what was the difference?\nAnswer: -561000.0\nQuestion: what, again, was the value in 2001?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1540000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4751	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) failure of the company to develop new products and product enhancements on a timely basis or within budget could harm the company 2019s results of operations and financial condition . for additional risks that may affect the company 2019s business and prospects following completion of the merger , see 201crisk factors 201d in item 1a of the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 29 , 2007 . goodwill the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in goodwill of approximately $ 3895100 . the factors contributing to the recognition of this amount of goodwill are based upon several strategic and synergistic benefits that are expected to be realized from the combination . these benefits include the expectation that the company 2019s complementary products and technologies will create a leading women 2019s healthcare company with an enhanced presence in hospitals , private practices and healthcare organizations . the company also expects to realize substantial synergies through the use of cytyc 2019s ob/gyn and breast surgeon sales channel to cross-sell the company 2019s existing and future products . the merger provides the company broader channel coverage within the united states and expanded geographic reach internationally , as well as increased scale and scope for further expanding operations through product development and complementary strategic transactions . supplemental unaudited pro-forma information the following unaudited pro forma information presents the consolidated results of operations of the company and cytyc as if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2007 , with pro forma adjustments to give effect to amortization of intangible assets , an increase in interest expense on acquisition financing and certain other adjustments together with related tax effects: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( approximate amounts in thousands except per share data )</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 1472400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 62600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income per share 2014basic</td><td>$ 0.52</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net income per share 2014assuming dilution</td><td>$ 0.50</td></tr></table> the $ 368200 charge for acquired in-process research and development that was a direct result of the transaction is excluded from the unaudited pro forma information above . the unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results that the company would have attained had the acquisitions of cytyc occurred at the beginning of the periods presented . prior to the close of the merger the board of directors of both hologic and cytyc approved a modification to certain outstanding equity awards for cytyc employees . the modification provided for the acceleration of vesting upon the close of merger for those awards that did not provide for acceleration upon a change of control as part of the original terms of the award . this modification was made so that the company will not incur stock based compensation charges that it otherwise would have if the awards had continued to vest under their original terms . credit agreement on october 22 , 2007 , company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries , entered into a senior secured credit agreement with goldman sachs credit partners l.p . and certain other lenders , ( collectively , the 201clenders 201d ) . pursuant to the terms and conditions of the credit agreement , the lenders have committed to provide senior secured financing in an aggregate amount of up to $ 2550000 . as of the closing of the cytyc merger , the company borrowed $ 2350000 under the credit facilities. .\nQuestion: considering the acquisitions of the company and cytyc at the beginning of fiscal 2007, how much did the net income represent in relation to the net revenue in that year?\nAnswer: 0.04252\nQuestion: and considering that net income and the eps, what can be concluded to have been the number of outstanding shares in that year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "120384.61538" } ]
CONVFINQA9627	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our ordinary shares have been publicly traded since november 17 , 2011 when our ordinary shares were listed and began trading on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) under the symbol 201cdlph . 201d on december 4 , 2017 , following the spin-off of delphi technologies , the company changed its name to aptiv plc and its nyse symbol to 201captv . 201d as of january 25 , 2019 , there were 2 shareholders of record of our ordinary shares . the following graph reflects the comparative changes in the value from december 31 , 2013 through december 31 , 2018 , assuming an initial investment of $ 100 and the reinvestment of dividends , if any in ( 1 ) our ordinary shares , ( 2 ) the s&p 500 index and ( 3 ) the automotive peer group . historical share prices of our ordinary shares have been adjusted to reflect the separation . historical performance may not be indicative of future shareholder returns . stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2013 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2018 . ( 1 ) aptiv plc , adjusted for the distribution of delphi technologies on december 4 , 2017 ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive peer group 2013 adient plc , american axle & manufacturing holdings inc , aptiv plc , borgwarner inc , cooper tire & rubber co , cooper- standard holdings inc , dana inc , dorman products inc , ford motor co , garrett motion inc. , general motors co , gentex corp , gentherm inc , genuine parts co , goodyear tire & rubber co , lear corp , lkq corp , meritor inc , motorcar parts of america inc , standard motor products inc , stoneridge inc , superior industries international inc , tenneco inc , tesla inc , tower international inc , visteon corp , wabco holdings inc company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company index</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aptiv plc ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 122.75</td><td>$ 146.49</td><td>$ 117.11</td><td>$ 178.46</td><td>$ 130.80</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 ( 2 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>113.69</td><td>115.26</td><td>129.05</td><td>157.22</td><td>150.33</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automotive peer group ( 3 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>107.96</td><td>108.05</td><td>107.72</td><td>134.04</td><td>106.89</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of the aptiv plc in 2018?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "130.8" } ]
CONVFINQA7688	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents ( e ) other adjustments primarily include certain historical retention costs , unusual , non-recurring litigation matters , secondary-offering-related expenses and expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago . during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , we recorded ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses of $ 75.0 million . for additional information on the ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses , see note 10 ( stockholder 2019s equity ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . ( f ) includes the impact of consolidating five months for the year ended december 31 , 2015 of kelway 2019s financial results . ( 4 ) non-gaap net income excludes , among other things , charges related to the amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets , non-cash equity-based compensation , acquisition and integration expenses , and gains and losses from the extinguishment of long-term debt . non-gaap net income is considered a non-gaap financial measure . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that non-gaap net income provides meaningful information regarding our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . the following unaudited table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to non-gaap net income for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization of intangibles ( a )</td><td>173.9</td><td>161.2</td><td>161.2</td><td>163.7</td><td>165.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation related to equity investment ( b )</td><td>20.0</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net loss on extinguishments of long-term debt</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>3.7</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>61.2</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f )</td><td>-64.8 ( 64.8 )</td><td>-103.0 ( 103.0 )</td><td>-113.5 ( 113.5 )</td><td>-71.6 ( 71.6 )</td><td>-106.8 ( 106.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-gaap net income ( g )</td><td>$ 503.5</td><td>$ 409.9</td><td>$ 314.3</td><td>$ 247.1</td><td>$ 198.8</td></tr></table> acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 3.7 ( 0.3 ) 61.2 ( 3.3 ) ( 15.6 ) aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f ) ( 64.8 ) ( 103.0 ) ( 113.5 ) ( 71.6 ) ( 106.8 ) non-gaap net income ( g ) $ 503.5 $ 409.9 $ 314.3 $ 247.1 $ 198.8 ( a ) includes amortization expense for acquisition-related intangible assets , primarily customer relationships , customer contracts and trade names . ( b ) represents our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to our acquisition of kelway . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway . ( e ) primarily includes expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago and secondary- offering-related expenses . amount in 2013 primarily relates to ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses . ( f ) based on a normalized effective tax rate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) ( 39.0% ( 39.0 % ) prior to the kelway acquisition ) , except for the non- cash equity-based compensation from our equity investment and the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway , which were tax effected at a rate of 35.4% ( 35.4 % ) . the aggregate adjustment for income taxes also includes a $ 4.0 million deferred tax benefit recorded during the three months and year ended december 31 , 2015 as a result of a tax rate reduction in the united kingdom and additional tax expense during the year ended december 31 , 2015 of $ 3.3 million as a result of recording withholding tax on the unremitted earnings of our canadian subsidiary . additionally , note that certain acquisition costs are non-deductible. .\nQuestion: what is the non-gaap net income in 2013 if ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses is not inlcuded?\nAnswer: 389.3\nQuestion: what is the net income in 2015?\nAnswer: 403.1\nQuestion: what about the expense related to non-cash equity-based compensation?\nAnswer: 31.2\nQuestion: what would be the net income if this expense is not included, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "434.3" } ]
CONVFINQA5706	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes receivable in 2014 , we entered into a $ 3.0 million promissory note with a privately held company which was recorded at cost . the interest rate on the promissory note is 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and is payable quarterly . all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the promissory note is due and payable on the earlier of august 26 , 2017 , or upon default . 5 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we lease various operating spaces in north america , europe , asia and australia under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements that expire on various dates through 2024 . these arrangements require us to pay certain operating expenses , such as taxes , repairs , and insurance and contain renewal and escalation clauses . we recognize rent expense under these arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease . as of december 31 , 2015 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 6306</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>6678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>6260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>5809</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>5580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21450</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 52083</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 6.7 million , $ 3.3 million and $ 3.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction such as our financial involvement in structural elements of asset construction , making decisions related to tenant improvement costs and purchasing insurance not reimbursable by the buyer-lessor ( the landlord ) , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction completion and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . due to our continued involvement in the property and lack of transferability of related risks and rewards of ownership to the landlord post construction , we account for the building and related improvements as a lease financing obligation . accordingly , as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 42.5 million and $ 43.6 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.3 million and $ 41.2 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation included in rent expense above , amounted to $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . there was no land lease expense for the year ended december 31 , 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the rent expense for operating leases at the end of 2015?\nAnswer: 6.7\nQuestion: what was the expense in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.3" } ]
CONVFINQA754	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncash flows from operating activities can fluctuate significantly from period to period , as pension funding decisions , tax timing differences and other items can significantly impact cash flows . in both 2007 and 2006 , the company made discretionary contributions of $ 200 million to its u.s . qualified pension plan , and in 2005 made discretionary contributions totaling $ 500 million . in 2007 , cash flows provided by operating activities increased $ 436 million , including an increase in net income of $ 245 million . since the gain from sale of businesses is included in and increases net income , the pre-tax gain from the sale of the businesses must be subtracted , as shown above , to properly reflect operating cash flows . the cash proceeds from the sale of the pharmaceuticals business are shown as part of cash from investing activities ; however , when the related taxes are paid they are required to be shown as part of cash provided by operating activities . thus , operating cash flows for 2007 were penalized due to cash income tax payments of approximately $ 630 million in 2007 that related to the sale of the global branded pharmaceuticals business . non-pharmaceutical related cash income tax payments were approximately $ 475 million lower than 2006 due to normal timing differences in tax payments , which benefited cash flows . accounts receivable and inventory increases reduced cash flows in 2007 , but decreased cash flow less than in 2006 , resulting in a year-on-year benefit to cash flows of $ 323 million . the category 201cother-net 201d in the preceding table reflects changes in other asset and liability accounts , including the impact of cash payments made in connection with 3m 2019s restructuring actions ( note 4 ) . in 2006 , cash flows provided by operating activities decreased $ 365 million . this decrease was due in large part to an increase of approximately $ 600 million in tax payments in 2006 compared with 2005 . the higher tax payments in 2006 primarily related to the company 2019s repatriation of $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . the category 201cother-net 201d in the preceding table reflects changes in other asset and liability accounts , including outstanding liabilities at december 31 , 2006 , related to 3m 2019s restructuring actions ( note 4 ) . cash flows from investing activities : years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchases of property plant and equipment ( pp&e )</td><td>$ -1422 ( 1422 )</td><td>$ -1168 ( 1168 )</td><td>$ -943 ( 943 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>proceeds from sale of pp&e and other assets</td><td>103</td><td>49</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisitions net of cash acquired</td><td>-539 ( 539 )</td><td>-888 ( 888 )</td><td>-1293 ( 1293 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>proceeds from sale of businesses</td><td>897</td><td>1209</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchases and proceeds from sale or maturities of marketable securities and investments 2014 net</td><td>-406 ( 406 )</td><td>-662 ( 662 )</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>$ -1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>$ -1460 ( 1460 )</td><td>$ -2241 ( 2241 )</td></tr></table> investments in property , plant and equipment enable growth in diverse markets , helping to meet product demand and increasing manufacturing efficiency . in 2007 , numerous plants were opened or expanded internationally . this included two facilities in korea ( respirator manufacturing facility and optical plant ) , an optical plant in poland , industrial adhesives/tapes facilities in both brazil and the philippines , a plant in russia ( corrosion protection , industrial adhesive and tapes , and respirators ) , a plant in china ( optical systems , industrial adhesives and tapes , and personal care ) , an expansion in canada ( construction and home improvement business ) , in addition to investments in india , mexico and other countries . in addition , 3m expanded manufacturing capabilities in the u.s. , including investments in industrial adhesives/tapes and optical . 3m also exited several high-cost underutilized manufacturing facilities and streamlined several supply chains by relocating equipment from one facility to another . the streamlining work has primarily occurred inside the u.s . and is in addition to the streamlining achieved through plant construction . as a result of this increased activity , capital expenditures were $ 1.422 billion in 2007 , an increase of $ 254 million when compared to 2006 . the company expects capital expenditures to total approximately $ 1.3 billion to $ 1.4 billion in 2008 . refer to the preceding 201ccapital spending/net property , plant and equipment 201d section for more detail . refer to note 2 for information on 2007 , 2006 and 2005 acquisitions . note 2 also provides information on the proceeds from the sale of businesses . the company is actively considering additional acquisitions , investments and strategic alliances , and from time to time may also divest certain businesses . purchases of marketable securities and investments and proceeds from sale ( or maturities ) of marketable securities and investments are primarily attributable to asset-backed securities , agency securities , corporate medium-term note securities , auction rate securities and other securities , which are classified as available-for-sale . refer to note 9 for more details about 3m 2019s diversified marketable securities portfolio , which totaled $ 1.059 billion as of december 31 , 2007 . purchases of marketable securities , net of sales and maturities , totaled $ 429 million for 2007 and $ 637 million for 2006 . purchases of investments in 2005 include the purchase of 19% ( 19 % ) of ti&m beteiligungsgesellschaft mbh for .\nQuestion: what is the increase in tax payment in 2006?\nAnswer: 600.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in cash flows provided by operating activities in 2006?\nAnswer: 365.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of tax payment to the net change in cash flows provided by operating activities in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.64384" } ]
CONVFINQA5937	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2017 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................... . 39 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2017 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 )</td><td>27</td></tr></table> infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................ . 27 ______________________________ ( 1 ) see note 29 - subsequent events in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . amcel ae , aoplus ae , ateva ae , avicor ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx ae , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , dur- o-set ae , ecomid ae , ecovae ae , forflex ae , forprene ae , frianyl ae , fortron ae , ghr ae , gumfit ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , laprene ae , metalx ae , mowilith ae , mt ae , nilamid ae , nivionplast ae , nutrinova ae , nylfor ae , pibiflex ae , pibifor ae , pibiter ae , polifor ae , resyn ae , riteflex ae , slidex ae , sofprene ae , sofpur ae , sunett ae , talcoprene ae , tecnoprene ae , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vectra ae , vinac ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc . hostaform ae is a registered trademark of hoechst gmbh . mowilith ae and nilamid ae are registered trademarks of celanese in most european countries . we monitor competitive developments and defend against infringements on our intellectual property rights . neither celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent , trademark , copyright or trade secret . environmental and other regulation matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed in item 1a . risk factors , as well as note 2 - summary of accounting policies , note 16 - environmental and note 24 - commitments and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. .\nQuestion: what was the amount spent for r&d in 2016?\nAnswer: 78.0\nQuestion: what was the amount spent in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "119.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2771	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nresults of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 6179</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>91</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grand gulf recovery</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2017 net revenue</td><td>$ 6318</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\nQuestion: what is the net revenue in 2017?\nAnswer: 6318.0\nQuestion: what about in 2016?\nAnswer: 6179.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "139.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6787	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .\nQuestion: what was the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2011, multiplied by 1000?\nAnswer: 8600.0\nQuestion: what is that as a percent of total industrial packaging sales?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.82454" } ]
CONVFINQA11050	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrestricted unit awards in 2010 and 2009 , the hartford issued restricted units as part of the hartford 2019s 2005 stock plan . restricted stock unit awards under the plan have historically been settled in shares , but under this award will be settled in cash and are thus referred to as 201crestricted units 201d . the economic value recipients will ultimately realize will be identical to the value that would have been realized if the awards had been settled in shares , i.e. , upon settlement , recipients will receive cash equal to the hartford 2019s share price multiplied by the number of restricted units awarded . because restricted units will be settled in cash , the awards are remeasured at the end of each reporting period until settlement . awards granted in 2009 vested after a three year period . awards granted in 2010 include both graded and cliff vesting restricted units which vest over a three year period . the graded vesting attribution method is used to recognize the expense of the award over the requisite service period . for example , the graded vesting attribution method views one three-year grant with annual graded vesting as three separate sub-grants , each representing one third of the total number of awards granted . the first sub-grant vests over one year , the second sub-grant vests over two years and the third sub-grant vests over three years . there were no restricted units awarded for 2013 or 2012 . as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , 27 thousand and 832 thousand restricted units were outstanding , respectively . deferred stock unit plan effective july 31 , 2009 , the compensation and management development committee of the board authorized the hartford deferred stock unit plan ( 201cdeferred stock unit plan 201d ) , and , on october 22 , 2009 , it was amended . the deferred stock unit plan provides for contractual rights to receive cash payments based on the value of a specified number of shares of stock . the deferred stock unit plan provides for two award types , deferred units and restricted units . deferred units are earned ratably over a year , based on the number of regular pay periods occurring during such year . deferred units are credited to the participant's account on a quarterly basis based on the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant and are fully vested at all times . deferred units credited to employees prior to january 1 , 2010 ( other than senior executive officers hired on or after october 1 , 2009 ) are not paid until after two years from their grant date . deferred units credited on or after january 1 , 2010 ( and any credited to senior executive officers hired on or after october 1 , 2009 ) are paid in three equal installments after the first , second and third anniversaries of their grant date . restricted units are intended to be incentive compensation and , unlike deferred units , vest over time , generally three years , and are subject to forfeiture . the deferred stock unit plan is structured consistent with the limitations and restrictions on employee compensation arrangements imposed by the emergency economic stabilization act of 2008 and the tarp standards for compensation and corporate governance interim final rule issued by the u.s . department of treasury on june 10 , 2009 . there were no deferred stock units awarded in 2013 or 2012 . a summary of the status of the company 2019s non-vested awards under the deferred stock unit plan as of december 31 , 2013 , is presented below : non-vested units restricted units ( in thousands ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>non-vested units</td><td>restricted units ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at beginning of year</td><td>309</td><td>25.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-306 ( 306 )</td><td>25.04</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>28.99</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at end of year</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> subsidiary stock plan in 2013 the hartford established a subsidiary stock-based compensation plan similar to the hartford 2010 incentive stock plan except that it awards non-public subsidiary stock as compensation . the company recognized stock-based compensation plans expense of $ 1 in the year ended december 31 , 2013 for the subsidiary stock plan . upon employee vesting of subsidiary stock , the company will recognize a noncontrolling equity interest . employees will be restricted from selling vested subsidiary stock to other than the company and the company will have discretion on the amount of stock to repurchase . therefore the subsidiary stock will be classified as equity because it is not mandatorily redeemable . table of contents the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 19 . stock compensation plans ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the total value of vested units?\nAnswer: 7662.24\nQuestion: and of forfeited units?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "86.97" } ]
CONVFINQA7212	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunited parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above . these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 . the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively . these notes are not callable . the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2291</td><td>2291</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>285</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-990 ( 990 )</td><td>-896 ( 896 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1656</td><td>$ 1653</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the number of vehicles under capital lease in 2017?\nAnswer: 70.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\nAnswer: 68.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in that number over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.0" } ]
CONVFINQA49	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbaker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements bhge 2017 form 10-k \| 85 the total intrinsic value of rsus ( defined as the value of the shares awarded at the current market price ) vested and outstanding in 2017 was $ 17 million and $ 38 million , respectively . the total fair value of rsus vested in 2017 was $ 19 million . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was $ 98 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested rsus , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years . note 12 . equity common stock we are authorized to issue 2 billion shares of class a common stock , 1.25 billion shares of class b common stock and 50 million shares of preferred stock each of which have a par value of $ 0.0001 per share . on july 3 , 2017 , each share of baker hughes common stock was converted into one share of class a common stock in the company . the number of class a common stock and class b common stock shares outstanding at december 31 , 2017 is 422 million and 707 million , respectively . we have not issued any preferred stock . ge owns all the issued and outstanding class b common stock . each share of class a and class b common stock and the associated membership interest in bhge llc form a paired interest . while each share of class b common stock has equal voting rights to a share of class a common stock , it has no economic rights , meaning holders of class b common stock have no right to dividends and any assets in the event of liquidation of the company . former baker hughes stockholders immediately after the completion of the transactions received a special one-time cash dividend of $ 17.50 per share paid by the company to holders of record of the company's class a common stock . in addition , during 2017 the company declared and paid regular dividends of $ 0.17 per share and $ 0.18 per share to holders of record of the company's class a common stock during the quarters ended september 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively . the following table presents the changes in number of shares outstanding ( in thousands ) : class a common class b common . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>class a common stock</td><td>class b common stock</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2016</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issue of shares on business combination at july 3 2017</td><td>427709</td><td>717111</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>issue of shares upon vesting of restricted stock units ( 1 )</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>issue of shares on exercises of stock options ( 1 )</td><td>256</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock repurchase program ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>-6047 ( 6047 )</td><td>-10126 ( 10126 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2017</td><td>422208</td><td>706985</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) share amounts reflected above are net of shares withheld to satisfy the employee's tax withholding obligation . ( 2 ) on november 2 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized bhge llc to repurchase up to $ 3 billion of its common units from the company and ge . the proceeds of this repurchase are to be used by bhge to repurchase class a common stock of the company on the open market , which if fully implemented would result in the repurchase of approximately $ 1.1 billion of class a common stock . the class b common stock of the company , that is paired with repurchased common units , was repurchased by the company at par value . the $ 3 billion repurchase authorization is the aggregate authorization for repurchases of class a and class b common stock together with its paired unit . bhge llc had authorization remaining to repurchase up to approximately $ 2.5 billion of its common units from bhge and ge at december 31 , 2017 . ( 3 ) during 2017 , we repurchased and canceled 6046735 shares of class a common stock for a total of $ 187 million . we also repurchased and canceled 10126467 shares of class b common stock from ge which is paired together with common units of bhge llc for $ 314 million. .\nQuestion: what is the number of class b shares issued in 2017 times 1000?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1250.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8979	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 9 2014goodwill and other intangibles , net goodwill the following table outlines the activity in the carrying value of the company 2019s goodwill , which is all assigned to the company 2019s trading and investing segment ( dollars in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>trading & investing</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 1934232</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>activity</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>1934232</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impairment of goodwill</td><td>-142423 ( 142423 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 1791809</td></tr></table> goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis and when events or changes indicate the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value and the loss may not be recoverable . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company 2019s trading and investing segment had two reporting units ; market making and retail brokerage . at the end of june 2013 , the company decided to exit its market making business . based on this decision in the second quarter of 2013 , the company conducted an interim goodwill impairment test for the market making reporting unit , using the expected sale structure of the market making business . this structure assumed a shorter period of cash flows related to an order flow arrangement , compared to prior estimates of fair value . based on the results of the first step of the goodwill impairment test , the company determined that the carrying value of the market making reporting unit , including goodwill , exceeded the fair value for that reporting unit as of june 30 , 2013 . the company proceeded to the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of goodwill impairment . as a result of the evaluation , it was determined that the entire carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the market making reporting unit was impaired , and the company recognized a $ 142.4 million impairment of goodwill during the second quarter of 2013 . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , the company performed its annual goodwill assessment for the retail brokerage reporting unit , electing to qualitatively assess whether it was more likely than not that the fair value was less than the carrying value . as a result of this assessment , the company determined that the first step of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary , and concluded that goodwill was not impaired at december 31 , 2013 . at december 31 , 2013 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 142.4 million related to the trading and investing segment and $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment . at december 31 , 2012 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2013, what percentage did the impairment of goodwill represent in relation to the total goodwill balance?\nAnswer: 0.07949\nQuestion: and what was this impairment amount as a percentage of that balance as of december 31 of the previous year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.07363" } ]
CONVFINQA9478	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe breakdown of aes 2019s gross margin for the years ended december 31 , 2000 and 1999 , based on the geographic region in which they were earned , is set forth below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>north america</td><td>2000 $ 844 million</td><td>% ( % ) of revenue 25% ( 25 % )</td><td>1999 $ 649 million</td><td>% ( % ) of revenue 32% ( 32 % )</td><td>% ( % ) change 30% ( 30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>south america</td><td>$ 416 million</td><td>36% ( 36 % )</td><td>$ 232 million</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>79% ( 79 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>caribbean</td><td>$ 226 million</td><td>21% ( 21 % )</td><td>$ 75 million</td><td>24% ( 24 % )</td><td>201% ( 201 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>europe/africa</td><td>$ 371 million</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>$ 124 million</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>199% ( 199 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asia</td><td>$ 138 million</td><td>22% ( 22 % )</td><td>$ 183 million</td><td>37% ( 37 % )</td><td>( 26% ( 26 % ) )</td></tr></table> includes venezuela and colombia . selling , general and administrative expenses selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 11 million , or 15% ( 15 % ) , to $ 82 million in 2000 from $ 71 million in 1999 . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues remained constant at 1% ( 1 % ) in both 2000 and 1999 . the increase is due to an increase in business development activities . interest expense , net net interest expense increased $ 506 million , or 80% ( 80 % ) , to $ 1.1 billion in 2000 from $ 632 million in 1999 . interest expense as a percentage of revenues remained constant at 15% ( 15 % ) in both 2000 and 1999 . interest expense increased primarily due to the interest at new businesses , including drax , tiete , cilcorp and edc , as well as additional corporate interest costs resulting from the senior debt and convertible securities issued within the past two years . other income , net other income increased $ 16 million , or 107% ( 107 % ) , to $ 31 million in 2000 from $ 15 million in 1999 . other income includes foreign currency transaction gains and losses as well as other non-operating income . the increase in other income is due primarily to a favorable legal judgment and the sale of development projects . severance and transaction costs during the fourth quarter of 2000 , the company incurred approximately $ 79 million of transaction and contractual severance costs related to the acquisition of ipalco . gain on sale of assets during 2000 , ipalco sold certain assets ( 2018 2018thermal assets 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 162 million . the transaction resulted in a gain to the company of approximately $ 31 million . of the net proceeds , $ 88 million was used to retire debt specifically assignable to the thermal assets . during 1999 , the company recorded a $ 29 million gain ( before extraordinary loss ) from the buyout of its long-term power sales agreement at placerita . the company received gross proceeds of $ 110 million which were offset by transaction related costs of $ 19 million and an impairment loss of $ 62 million to reduce the carrying value of the electric generation assets to their estimated fair value after termination of the contract . the estimated fair value was determined by an independent appraisal . concurrent with the buyout of the power sales agreement , the company repaid the related non-recourse debt prior to its scheduled maturity and recorded an extraordinary loss of $ 11 million , net of income taxes. .\nQuestion: what is the south america percent of revenue 25%?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.36" } ]
CONVFINQA6481	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncelanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 )</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program</td><td>approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31 2014</td><td>192580</td><td>$ 58.02</td><td>164800</td><td>$ 490000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30 2014</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 59.25</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 463000000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31 2014</td><td>199796</td><td>$ 60.78</td><td>190259</td><td>$ 451000000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>860504</td><td>-</td><td>823187</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed \"soliciting material\" or to be \"filed\" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return .\nQuestion: what was the total number of shares purchased in december of 2014?\nAnswer: 199796.0\nQuestion: and what was the average price paid for each of those shares?\nAnswer: 60.78\nQuestion: what was, then, the total amount spent in the purchase of those shares?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12143600.88" } ]
CONVFINQA5599	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial conditionand results of operations d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 1 1 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t 2022 interest expense on the company 2019s secured debt decreased from $ 30.8 million in 2001 to $ 22.9 million in 2002 as the company paid off $ 13.5 million of secured debt throughout 2002 and experienced lower borrowings on its secured line of credit during 2002 compared to 2001 . additionally , the company paid off approximately $ 128.5 million of secured debt throughout 2001 . 2022 interest expense on the company 2019s $ 500 million unsecured line of credit decreased by approximately $ 1.1 million in 2002 compared to 2001 as the company maintained lower balances on the line throughout most of 2002 . as a result of the above-mentioned items , earnings from rental operations decreased $ 35.0 million from $ 254.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 219.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . service operations service operations primarily consist of leasing , management , construction and development services for joint venture properties and properties owned by third parties . service operations revenues decreased from $ 80.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 68.6 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . the prolonged effect of the slow economy has been the primary factor in the overall decrease in revenues . the company experienced a decrease of $ 12.7 million in net general contractor revenues because of a decrease in the volume of construction in 2002 , compared to 2001 , as well as slightly lower profit margins . property management , maintenance and leasing fee revenues decreased from $ 22.8 million in 2001 to $ 14.3 million in 2002 primarily because of a decrease in landscaping maintenance revenue resulting from the sale of the landscaping operations in the third quarter of 2001 . construction management and development activity income represents construction and development fees earned on projects where the company acts as the construction manager along with profits from the company 2019s held for sale program whereby the company develops a property for sale upon completion . the increase in revenues of $ 10.3 million in 2002 is primarily due to an increase in volume of the sale of properties from the held for sale program . service operations expenses decreased from $ 45.3 million in 2001 to $ 38.3 million in 2002 . the decrease is attributable to the decrease in construction and development activity and the reduced overhead costs as a result of the sale of the landscape business in 2001 . as a result of the above , earnings from service operations decreased from $ 35.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 30.3 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . general and administrative expense general and administrative expense increased from $ 15.6 million in 2001 to $ 25.4 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . the company has been successful reducing total operating and administration costs ; however , reduced construction and development activities have resulted in a greater amount of overhead being charged to general and administrative expense instead of being capitalized into development projects or charged to service operations . other income and expenses gain on sale of land and depreciable property dispositions , net of impairment adjustment , is comprised of the following amounts in 2002 and 2001 : gain on sales of depreciable properties represent sales of previously held for investment rental properties . beginning in 2000 and continuing into 2001 , the company pursued favorable opportunities to dispose of real estate assets that no longer met long-term investment objectives . in 2002 , the company significantly reduced this property sales program until the business climate improves and provides better investment opportunities for the sale proceeds . gain on land sales represents sales of undeveloped land owned by the company . the company pursues opportunities to dispose of land in markets with a high concentration of undeveloped land and those markets where the land no longer meets strategic development plans of the company . the company recorded a $ 9.4 million adjustment in 2002 associated with six properties determined to have an impairment of book value . the company has analyzed each of its in-service properties and has determined that there are no additional valuation adjustments that need to be made as of december 31 , 2002 . the company recorded an adjustment of $ 4.8 million in 2001 for one property that the company had contracted to sell for a price less than its book value . other revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2002 , includes $ 1.4 million of gain related to an interest rate swap that did not qualify for hedge accounting. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gain on sales of depreciable properties</td><td>$ 4491</td><td>$ 45428</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gain on land sales</td><td>4478</td><td>5080</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impairment adjustment</td><td>-9379 ( 9379 )</td><td>-4800 ( 4800 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ -410 ( 410 )</td><td>$ 45708</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of general and administrative expenses from 2001 to 2002?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9.8" } ]
CONVFINQA3647	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\non october 21 , 2004 , the hartford declared a dividend on its common stock of $ 0.29 per share payable on january 3 , 2005 to shareholders of record as of december 1 , 2004 . the hartford declared $ 331 and paid $ 325 in dividends to shareholders in 2004 , declared $ 300 and paid $ 291 in dividends to shareholders in 2003 , declared $ 262 and paid $ 257 in 2002 . aoci - aoci increased by $ 179 as of december 31 , 2004 compared with december 31 , 2003 . the increase in aoci is primarily the result of life 2019s adoption of sop 03-1 , which resulted in a $ 292 cumulative effect for unrealized gains on securities in the first quarter of 2004 related to the reclassification of investments from separate account assets to general account assets , partially offset by net unrealized losses on cash-flow hedging instruments . the funded status of the company 2019s pension and postretirement plans is dependent upon many factors , including returns on invested assets and the level of market interest rates . declines in the value of securities traded in equity markets coupled with declines in long- term interest rates have had a negative impact on the funded status of the plans . as a result , the company recorded a minimum pension liability as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , which resulted in an after-tax reduction of stockholders 2019 equity of $ 480 and $ 375 respectively . this minimum pension liability did not affect the company 2019s results of operations . for additional information on stockholders 2019 equity and aoci see notes 15 and 16 , respectively , of notes to consolidated financial statements . cash flow 2004 2003 2002 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2634</td><td>$ 3896</td><td>$ 2577</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>$ -2401 ( 2401 )</td><td>$ -8387 ( 8387 )</td><td>$ -6600 ( 6600 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by financing activities</td><td>$ 477</td><td>$ 4608</td><td>$ 4037</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash 2014 end of year</td><td>$ 1148</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 377</td></tr></table> 2004 compared to 2003 2014 cash from operating activities primarily reflects premium cash flows in excess of claim payments . the decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to the $ 1.15 billion settlement of the macarthur litigation in 2004 . cash provided by financing activities decreased primarily due to lower proceeds from investment and universal life-type contracts as a result of the adoption of sop 03-1 , decreased capital raising activities , repayment of commercial paper and early retirement of junior subordinated debentures in 2004 . the decrease in cash from financing activities and operating cash flows invested long-term accounted for the majority of the change in cash used for investing activities . 2003 compared to 2002 2014 the increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result of strong premium cash flows . financing activities increased primarily due to capital raising activities related to the 2003 asbestos reserve addition and decreased due to repayments on long-term debt and lower proceeds from investment and universal life-type contracts . the increase in cash from financing activities accounted for the majority of the change in cash used for investing activities . operating cash flows in each of the last three years have been adequate to meet liquidity requirements . equity markets for a discussion of the potential impact of the equity markets on capital and liquidity , see the capital markets risk management section under 201cmarket risk 201d . ratings ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position in the insurance and financial services marketplace . there can be no assurance that the company's ratings will continue for any given period of time or that they will not be changed . in the event the company's ratings are downgraded , the level of revenues or the persistency of the company's business may be adversely impacted . on august 4 , 2004 , moody 2019s affirmed the company 2019s and hartford life , inc . 2019s a3 senior debt ratings as well as the aa3 insurance financial strength ratings of both its property-casualty and life insurance operating subsidiaries . in addition , moody 2019s changed the outlook for all of these ratings from negative to stable . since the announcement of the suit filed by the new york attorney general 2019s office against marsh & mclennan companies , inc. , and marsh , inc . on october 14 , 2004 , the major independent ratings agencies have indicated that they continue to monitor developments relating to the suit . on october 22 , 2004 , standard & poor 2019s revised its outlook on the u.s . property/casualty commercial lines sector to negative from stable . on november 23 , 2004 , standard & poor 2019s revised its outlook on the financial strength and credit ratings of the property-casualty insurance subsidiaries to negative from stable . the outlook on the life insurance subsidiaries and corporate debt was unaffected. .\nQuestion: in 2014, what percentage of the hartford declared dividends was paid to shareholders?\nAnswer: 0.98187\nQuestion: and in that same year, what was the net cash provided by operating activities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2634.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4610	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin accordance with sfas no . 142 , goodwill and other intangible assets , the goodwill is not amortized , but will be subject to a periodic assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value-based test . none of this goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . the company performs its annual test for impairment of goodwill in may of each year . the company is required to perform a periodic assessment between annual tests in certain circumstances . the company has performed its annual test of goodwill as of may 1 , 2006 and has determined there was no impairment of goodwill during 2006 . the company allocated $ 15.8 million of the purchase price to in-process research and development projects . in-process research and development ( ipr&d ) represents the valuation of acquired , to-be- completed research projects . at the acquisition date , cyvera 2019s ongoing research and development initiatives were primarily involved with the development of its veracode technology and the beadxpress reader . these two projects were approximately 50% ( 50 % ) and 25% ( 25 % ) complete at the date of acquisition , respectively . as of december 31 , 2006 , these two projects were approximately 90% ( 90 % ) and 80% ( 80 % ) complete , respectively . the value assigned to purchased ipr&d was determined by estimating the costs to develop the acquired technology into commercially viable products , estimating the resulting net cash flows from the projects , and discounting the net cash flows to their present value . the revenue projections used to value the ipr&d were , in some cases , reduced based on the probability of developing a new technology , and considered the relevant market sizes and growth factors , expected trends in technology , and the nature and expected timing of new product introductions by the company and its competitors . the resulting net cash flows from such projects are based on the company 2019s estimates of cost of sales , operating expenses , and income taxes from such projects . the rates utilized to discount the net cash flows to their present value were based on estimated cost of capital calculations . due to the nature of the forecast and the risks associated with the projected growth and profitability of the developmental projects , discount rates of 30% ( 30 % ) were considered appropriate for the ipr&d . the company believes that these discount rates were commensurate with the projects 2019stage of development and the uncertainties in the economic estimates described above . if these projects are not successfully developed , the sales and profitability of the combined company may be adversely affected in future periods . the company believes that the foregoing assumptions used in the ipr&d analysis were reasonable at the time of the acquisition . no assurance can be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to estimate expected project sales , development costs or profitability , or the events associated with such projects , will transpire as estimated . at the date of acquisition , the development of these projects had not yet reached technological feasibility , and the research and development in progress had no alternative future uses . accordingly , these costs were charged to expense in the second quarter of 2005 . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the years ended january 1 , 2006 and january 2 , 2005 as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended january 1 , year ended january 2 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended january 1 2006</td><td>year ended january 2 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 73501</td><td>$ 50583</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net loss</td><td>-6234 ( 6234 )</td><td>-9965 ( 9965 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net loss per share basic and diluted</td><td>-0.15 ( 0.15 )</td><td>-0.27 ( 0.27 )</td></tr></table> illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the difference between the net loss of the year ended january 1 2006 and that of the year ended january 2 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3731.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10799	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nasset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .\nQuestion: what was the balance of level 3 in 2018?\nAnswer: 230.0\nQuestion: and as of 2017?\nAnswer: 140.0\nQuestion: so what was the change in value during these years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "90.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8771	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents statutory surplus the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries</td><td>$ 6410</td><td>$ 7388</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and casualty insurance subsidiaries</td><td>7645</td><td>7412</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14055</td><td>$ 14800</td></tr></table> statutory capital and surplus for the u.s . life insurance subsidiaries , including domestic captive insurance subsidiaries , decreased by $ 978 , primarily due to variable annuity surplus impacts of approximately $ 425 , a $ 200 increase in reserves on a change in valuation basis , $ 200 transfer of the mutual funds business from the u.s . life insurance companies to the life holding company , and an increase in the asset valuation reserve of $ 115 . as a result of the january 2013 statutory gain from the sale of the retirement plans and individual life businesses , the company's pro forma january 2 , 2013 u.s . life statutory surplus was estimated to be $ 8.1 billion , before approximately $ 1.5 billion in extraordinary dividends and return of capital to hfsg holding company . statutory capital and surplus for the property and casualty insurance subsidiaries increased by $ 233 , primarily due to statutory net income , after tax , of $ 727 , unrealized gains of $ 249 , and an increase in statutory admitted deferred tax assets of $ 77 , capital contributions of $ 14 , and an increase of statutory admitted assets of $ 7 , partially offset by dividends to the hfsg holding company of $ 841 . both net income and dividends are net of interest payments and dividends , respectively , on an intercompany note between hartford holdings , inc . and hartford fire insurance company . the company also holds regulatory capital and surplus for its operations in japan . under the accounting practices and procedures governed by japanese regulatory authorities , the company 2019s statutory capital and surplus was $ 1.1 billion and $ 1.3 billion as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . statutory capital the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity , as prepared using u.s . generally accepted accounting principles ( 201cu.s . gaap 201d ) was $ 22.4 billion as of december 31 , 2012 . the company 2019s estimated aggregate statutory capital and surplus , as prepared in accordance with the national association of insurance commissioners 2019 accounting practices and procedures manual ( 201cu.s . stat 201d ) was $ 14.1 billion as of december 31 , 2012 . significant differences between u.s . gaap stockholders 2019 equity and aggregate statutory capital and surplus prepared in accordance with u.s . stat include the following : 2022 u.s . stat excludes equity of non-insurance and foreign insurance subsidiaries not held by u.s . insurance subsidiaries . 2022 costs incurred by the company to acquire insurance policies are deferred under u.s . gaap while those costs are expensed immediately under u.s . 2022 temporary differences between the book and tax basis of an asset or liability which are recorded as deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability under u.s . gaap while those amounts deferred are subject to limitations under u.s . stat . 2022 the assumptions used in the determination of life benefit reserves is prescribed under u.s . stat , while the assumptions used under u.s . gaap are generally the company 2019s best estimates . the methodologies for determining life insurance reserve amounts may also be different . for example , reserving for living benefit reserves under u.s . stat is generally addressed by the commissioners 2019 annuity reserving valuation methodology and the related actuarial guidelines , while under u.s . gaap , those same living benefits may be considered embedded derivatives and recorded at fair value or they may be considered sop 03-1 reserves . the sensitivity of these life insurance reserves to changes in equity markets , as applicable , will be different between u.s . gaap and u.s . stat . 2022 the difference between the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity and other investments , net of tax , is recorded as an increase or decrease to the carrying value of the related asset and to equity under u.s . gaap , while u.s . stat only records certain securities at fair value , such as equity securities and certain lower rated bonds required by the naic to be recorded at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . 2022 u.s . stat for life insurance companies establishes a formula reserve for realized and unrealized losses due to default and equity risks associated with certain invested assets ( the asset valuation reserve ) , while u.s . gaap does not . also , for those realized gains and losses caused by changes in interest rates , u.s . stat for life insurance companies defers and amortizes the gains and losses , caused by changes in interest rates , into income over the original life to maturity of the asset sold ( the interest maintenance reserve ) while u.s . gaap does not . 2022 goodwill arising from the acquisition of a business is tested for recoverability on an annual basis ( or more frequently , as necessary ) for u.s . gaap , while under u.s . stat goodwill is amortized over a period not to exceed 10 years and the amount of goodwill is limited. .\nQuestion: in 2012, what percentage did the property and casualty insurance subsidiaries represent in relation to the total statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies?\nAnswer: 0.54393\nQuestion: and what was the change in the value of those property and casualty insurance subsidiaries since 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "233.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1592	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe also record an inventory obsolescence reserve , which represents the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value , based on various product sales projections . this reserve is calcu- lated using an estimated obsolescence percentage applied to the inventory based on age , historical trends and requirements to support forecasted sales . in addition , and as necessary , we may establish specific reserves for future known or anticipated events . pension and other post-retirement benefit costs we offer the following benefits to some or all of our employees : a domestic trust-based noncontributory qual- ified defined benefit pension plan ( 201cu.s . qualified plan 201d ) and an unfunded , non-qualified domestic noncon- tributory pension plan to provide benefits in excess of statutory limitations ( collectively with the u.s . qualified plan , the 201cdomestic plans 201d ) ; a domestic contributory defined contribution plan ; international pension plans , which vary by country , consisting of both defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans ; deferred compensation arrangements ; and certain other post- retirement benefit plans . the amounts needed to fund future payouts under our defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans are subject to numerous assumptions and variables . cer- tain significant variables require us to make assumptions that are within our control such as an anticipated discount rate , expected rate of return on plan assets and future compensation levels . we evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial advisors and select assumptions that we believe reflect the economics underlying our pension and post-retirement obligations . while we believe these assumptions are within accepted industry ranges , an increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control could have a direct impact on reported net earnings . the discount rate for each plan used for determining future net periodic benefit cost is based on a review of highly rated long-term bonds . for fiscal 2013 , we used a discount rate for our domestic plans of 3.90% ( 3.90 % ) and vary- ing rates on our international plans of between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) . the discount rate for our domestic plans is based on a bond portfolio that includes only long-term bonds with an aa rating , or equivalent , from a major rating agency . as of june 30 , 2013 , we used an above-mean yield curve , rather than the broad-based yield curve we used before , because we believe it represents a better estimate of an effective settlement rate of the obligation , and the timing and amount of cash flows related to the bonds included in this portfolio are expected to match the estimated defined benefit payment streams of our domestic plans . the benefit obligation of our domestic plans would have been higher by approximately $ 34 mil- lion at june 30 , 2013 had we not used the above-mean yield curve . for our international plans , the discount rate in a particular country was principally determined based on a yield curve constructed from high quality corporate bonds in each country , with the resulting portfolio having a duration matching that particular plan . for fiscal 2013 , we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for our u.s . qualified plan and varying rates of between 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for our international plans . in determining the long-term rate of return for a plan , we consider the historical rates of return , the nature of the plan 2019s investments and an expectation for the plan 2019s investment strategies . see 201cnote 12 2014 pension , deferred compensation and post-retirement benefit plans 201d of notes to consolidated financial statements for details regarding the nature of our pension and post-retirement plan invest- ments . the difference between actual and expected return on plan assets is reported as a component of accu- mulated other comprehensive income . those gains/losses that are subject to amortization over future periods will be recognized as a component of the net periodic benefit cost in such future periods . for fiscal 2013 , our pension plans had actual return on assets of approximately $ 74 million as compared with expected return on assets of approximately $ 64 million . the resulting net deferred gain of approximately $ 10 million , when combined with gains and losses from previous years , will be amortized over periods ranging from approximately 7 to 22 years . the actual return on plan assets from our international pen- sion plans exceeded expectations , primarily reflecting a strong performance from fixed income and equity invest- ments . the lower than expected return on assets from our u.s . qualified plan was primarily due to weakness in our fixed income investments , partially offset by our strong equity returns . a 25 basis-point change in the discount rate or the expected rate of return on plan assets would have had the following effect on fiscal 2013 pension expense : 25 basis-point 25 basis-point increase decrease ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>25 basis-point increase</td><td>25 basis-point decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discount rate</td><td>$ -3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>$ 3.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected return on assets</td><td>$ -2.5 ( 2.5 )</td><td>$ 2.7</td></tr></table> our post-retirement plans are comprised of health care plans that could be impacted by health care cost trend rates , which may have a significant effect on the amounts the est{e lauder companies inc . 115 .\nQuestion: what was the low rate for international plans?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.0225" } ]
CONVFINQA7536	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhii expects to incur higher costs to complete ships currently under construction in avondale due to anticipated reductions in productivity . as a result , in the second quarter of 2010 , the company increased the estimates to complete lpd-23 and lpd-25 by approximately $ 210 million . the company recognized a $ 113 million pre-tax charge to operating income for these contracts in the second quarter of 2010 . hii is exploring alternative uses of the avondale facility , including alternative opportunities for the workforce . in connection with and as a result of the decision to wind down shipbuilding operations at the avondale , louisiana facility , the company began incurring and paying related employee severance and incentive compensation liabilities and expenditures , asset retirement obligation liabilities that became reasonably estimable , and amounts owed for not meeting certain requirements under its cooperative endeavor agreement with the state of louisiana . the company anticipates that it will incur substantial other restructuring and facilities shutdown related costs , including , but not limited to , severance expense , relocation expense , and asset write-downs related to the avondale facilities . these costs are expected to be allowable expenses under government accounting standards and thus should be recoverable in future years 2019 overhead costs . these future costs could approximate $ 271 million , based on management 2019s current estimate . such costs should be recoverable under existing flexibly priced contracts or future negotiated contracts in accordance with federal acquisition regulation ( 201cfar 201d ) provisions relating to the treatment of restructuring and shutdown related costs . the company is currently in discussions with the u.s . navy regarding its cost submission to support the recoverability of these costs under the far and applicable contracts , and this submission is subject to review and acceptance by the u.s . navy . the defense contract audit agency ( 201cdcaa 201d ) , a dod agency , prepared an initial audit report on the company 2019s cost proposal for restructuring and shutdown related costs of $ 310 million , which stated that the proposal was not adequately supported for the dcaa to reach a conclusion and questioned approximately $ 25 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , of the costs submitted by the company . accordingly , the dcaa did not accept the proposal as submitted . the company has submitted a revised proposal to address the concerns of the dcaa and to reflect a revised estimated total cost of $ 271 million . should the company 2019s revised proposal be challenged by the u.s . navy , the company would likely pursue prescribed dispute resolution alternatives to resolve the challenge . that process , however , would create uncertainty as to the timing and eventual allowability of the costs related to the wind down of the avondale facility . ultimately , the company anticipates these discussions with the u.s . navy will result in an agreement that is substantially in accordance with management 2019s cost recovery expectations . accordingly , hii has treated these costs as allowable costs in determining the earnings performance on its contracts in process . the actual restructuring expenses related to the wind down may be greater than the company 2019s current estimate , and any inability to recover such costs could result in a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . the company also evaluated the effect that the wind down of the avondale facilities might have on the benefit plans in which hii employees participate . hii determined that the potential impact of a curtailment in these plans was not material to its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . the table below summarizes the company 2019s liability for restructuring and shutdown related costs associated with winding down the avondale facility . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , these costs are comprised primarily of employee severance and retention and incentive bonuses . these amounts were capitalized in inventoried costs , and will be recognized as expenses in cost of product sales beginning in 2014 . ( $ in millions ) employee compensation other accruals total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>employee compensation</td><td>other accruals</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2010</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrual established</td><td>27</td><td>39</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjustments</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 27</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 66</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accrual established</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>payments</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td><td>-60 ( 60 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>adjustments</td><td>47</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 50</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 50</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the absolute number of payments in employee compensation in 2011 with inverted sign?\nAnswer: -24.0\nQuestion: what is the sum between that and the adjustments in employee compensation in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "23.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5308	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncash and cash equivalents cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased . accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at the invoiced amounts , less an allowance for doubtful accounts , and generally do not bear interest . the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates . the company 2019s estimates include separately providing for customer receivables based on specific circumstances and credit conditions , and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible . account balances are written off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered . the company 2019s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of $ 15 million , $ 14 million and $ 15 million as of december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales as a reduction . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 67.6</td><td>$ 75.3</td><td>$ 77.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>bad debt expense</td><td>17.1</td><td>20.1</td><td>25.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs</td><td>-15.7 ( 15.7 )</td><td>-24.6 ( 24.6 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( a )</td><td>2.5</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td><td>-6.1 ( 6.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 71.5</td><td>$ 67.6</td><td>$ 75.3</td></tr></table> ( a ) other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits . inventory valuations inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value . certain u.s . inventory costs are determined on a last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) basis . lifo inventories represented 39% ( 39 % ) and 40% ( 40 % ) of consolidated inventories as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . all other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) methods . inventory values at fifo , as shown in note 5 , approximate replacement cost . property , plant and equipment property , plant and equipment assets are stated at cost . merchandising and customer equipment consists principally of various dispensing systems for the company 2019s cleaning and sanitizing products , dishwashing machines and process control and monitoring equipment . certain dispensing systems capitalized by the company are accounted for on a mass asset basis , whereby equipment is capitalized and depreciated as a group and written off when fully depreciated . the company capitalizes both internal and external costs of development or purchase of computer software for internal use . costs incurred for data conversion , training and maintenance associated with capitalized software are expensed as incurred . expenditures for major renewals and improvements , which significantly extend the useful lives of existing plant and equipment , are capitalized and depreciated . expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred . upon retirement or disposition of plant and equipment , the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in income . depreciation is charged to operations using the straight-line method over the assets 2019 estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 40 years for buildings and leasehold improvements , 3 to 20 years for machinery and equipment , 3 to 15 years for merchandising and customer equipment and 3 to 7 years for capitalized software . the straight-line method of depreciation reflects an appropriate allocation of the cost of the assets to earnings in proportion to the amount of economic benefits obtained by the company in each reporting period . depreciation expense was $ 586 million , $ 561 million and $ 560 million for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the percentage for lifo inventories of consolidated inventories in 2017?\nAnswer: 39.0\nQuestion: what was the percentage in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "40.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3519	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>155.99</td><td>215.10</td><td>270.83</td><td>350.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.32</td><td>164.84</td><td>167.06</td><td>187.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>151.58</td><td>198.02</td><td>174.88</td><td>201.26</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .\nQuestion: what was the performance price of the cadence design system in 2010?\nAnswer: 155.99\nQuestion: and what was the change in that price since 2009?\nAnswer: 55.99\nQuestion: how much does this change represent in relation to that 2009 performance price?\nAnswer: 0.5599\nQuestion: and what would be that change if 1000000 dollars were invested in 2009?\nAnswer: 559900.0\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the change in the performance price of the nasdaq composite?\nAnswer: 39.32\nQuestion: what is this change as a portion of the 2009 performance price?\nAnswer: 0.3932\nQuestion: if, in 2009, that same amount of 1000000 dollars had been invested in this stock, what would be that change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "393200.0" } ]
CONVFINQA479	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndecember 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/02</td><td>12/03</td><td>12/04</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>etrade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>260.29</td><td>307.61</td><td>429.22</td><td>461.32</td><td>73.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p super cap diversified financials</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.29</td><td>156.28</td><td>170.89</td><td>211.13</td><td>176.62</td></tr></table> 2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .\nQuestion: what was the value of etrade financial corp as of 12/07?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "73.05" } ]
CONVFINQA7197	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis the risk committee of the board and the risk governance committee ( through delegated authority from the firmwide risk committee ) approve market risk limits and sub-limits at firmwide , business and product levels , consistent with our risk appetite statement . in addition , market risk management ( through delegated authority from the risk governance committee ) sets market risk limits and sub-limits at certain product and desk levels . the purpose of the firmwide limits is to assist senior management in controlling our overall risk profile . sub-limits are set below the approved level of risk limits . sub-limits set the desired maximum amount of exposure that may be managed by any particular business on a day-to-day basis without additional levels of senior management approval , effectively leaving day-to-day decisions to individual desk managers and traders . accordingly , sub-limits are a management tool designed to ensure appropriate escalation rather than to establish maximum risk tolerance . sub-limits also distribute risk among various businesses in a manner that is consistent with their level of activity and client demand , taking into account the relative performance of each area . our market risk limits are monitored daily by market risk management , which is responsible for identifying and escalating , on a timely basis , instances where limits have been exceeded . when a risk limit has been exceeded ( e.g. , due to positional changes or changes in market conditions , such as increased volatilities or changes in correlations ) , it is escalated to senior managers in market risk management and/or the appropriate risk committee . such instances are remediated by an inventory reduction and/or a temporary or permanent increase to the risk limit . model review and validation our var and stress testing models are regularly reviewed by market risk management and enhanced in order to incorporate changes in the composition of positions included in our market risk measures , as well as variations in market conditions . prior to implementing significant changes to our assumptions and/or models , model risk management performs model validations . significant changes to our var and stress testing models are reviewed with our chief risk officer and chief financial officer , and approved by the firmwide risk committee . see 201cmodel risk management 201d for further information about the review and validation of these models . systems we have made a significant investment in technology to monitor market risk including : 2030 an independent calculation of var and stress measures ; 2030 risk measures calculated at individual position levels ; 2030 attribution of risk measures to individual risk factors of each position ; 2030 the ability to report many different views of the risk measures ( e.g. , by desk , business , product type or entity ) ; 2030 the ability to produce ad hoc analyses in a timely manner . metrics we analyze var at the firmwide level and a variety of more detailed levels , including by risk category , business , and region . the tables below present average daily var and period-end var , as well as the high and low var for the period . diversification effect in the tables below represents the difference between total var and the sum of the vars for the four risk categories . this effect arises because the four market risk categories are not perfectly correlated . the table below presents average daily var by risk category. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2017</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates</td><td>$ 40</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity prices</td><td>24</td><td>25</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currency rates</td><td>12</td><td>21</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodity prices</td><td>13</td><td>17</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>diversification effect</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-45 ( 45 )</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 76</td></tr></table> our average daily var decreased to $ 54 million in 2017 from $ 63 million in 2016 , due to reductions across all risk categories , partially offset by a decrease in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was primarily due to lower levels of volatility . our average daily var decreased to $ 63 million in 2016 from $ 76 million in 2015 , due to reductions across all risk categories , partially offset by a decrease in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was primarily due to reduced exposures . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 91 .\nQuestion: what was the average daily var in the currency rates risk category in 2017?\nAnswer: 12.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\nAnswer: 21.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: -9.0\nQuestion: what was the average daily var in the currency rates risk category in 2016?\nAnswer: 21.0\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation this 2016 average daily var, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.42857" } ]
CONVFINQA407	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .\nQuestion: what was the total amount of long-term debt in the years of 2013 and 2014, combined?\nAnswer: 2753.3\nQuestion: and what was the total amount of debt in that same period?\nAnswer: 3395.3\nQuestion: how much, then, does the total amount of long-term debt represent in relation to the total debt in this period?\nAnswer: 0.81092\nQuestion: and how much is that in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "81.09151" } ]
CONVFINQA347	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 17 . debt our debt as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : capital lease obligations total debt and capital lease obligations less : current portion debt and capital lease obligations $ 1494627 19681 1514308 $ 1505096 $ 1493969 28492 1522461 $ 1513662 in february 2010 , we issued $ 600.0 million of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 900.0 million of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d and , together with the 2015 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . our proceeds were approximately $ 1.5 billion and were net of an issuance discount of $ 6.6 million . the notes rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in addition , we incurred issuance costs of approximately $ 10.7 million . both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes using the effective interest method . the effective interest rate including the discount and issuance costs is 3.45% ( 3.45 % ) for the 2015 notes and 4.92% ( 4.92 % ) for the 2020 notes . interest is payable semi-annually , in arrears , on february 1 and august 1 , commencing on august 1 , 2010 . during fiscal 2011 interest payments totaled $ 62.3 million . the proceeds from the notes are available for general corporate purposes , including repayment of any balance outstanding on our credit facility . based on quoted market prices , the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 1.6 billion as of december 2 , 2011 . we may redeem the notes at any time , subject to a make whole premium . in addition , upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events , we may be required to repurchase the notes , at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the notes also include covenants that limit our ability to grant liens on assets and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions , subject to significant allowances . as of december 2 , 2011 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . credit agreement in august 2007 , we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement dated february 2007 ( the 201camendment 201d ) , which increased the total senior unsecured revolving facility from $ 500.0 million to $ 1.0 billion . the amendment also permits us to request one-year extensions effective on each anniversary of the closing date of the original agreement , subject to the majority consent of the lenders . we also retain an option to request an additional $ 500.0 million in commitments , for a maximum aggregate facility of $ 1.5 billion . in february 2008 , we entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement dated february 26 , 2008 , which extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to february 16 , 2013 . the facility would terminate at this date if no additional extensions have been requested and granted . all other terms and conditions remain the same . the facility contains a financial covenant requiring us not to exceed a certain maximum leverage ratio . at our option , borrowings under the facility accrue interest based on either the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) for one , two , three or six months , or longer periods with bank consent , plus a margin according to a pricing grid tied to this financial covenant , or a base rate . the margin is set at rates between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.475% ( 0.475 % ) . commitment fees are payable on the facility at rates between 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) and 0.15% ( 0.15 % ) per year based on the same pricing grid . the facility is available to provide loans to us and certain of our subsidiaries for general corporate purposes . on february 1 , 2010 , we paid the outstanding balance on our credit facility and the entire $ 1.0 billion credit line under this facility remains available for borrowing . capital lease obligation in june 2010 , we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement to sell equipment totaling $ 32.2 million and leaseback the same equipment over a period of 43 months . this transaction was classified as a capital lease obligation and recorded at fair value . as of december 2 , 2011 , our capital lease obligations of $ 19.7 million includes $ 9.2 million of current debt . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes</td><td>$ 1494627</td><td>$ 1493969</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>19681</td><td>28492</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>1514308</td><td>1522461</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>less : current portion</td><td>9212</td><td>8799</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 1505096</td><td>$ 1513662</td></tr></table> note 17 . debt our debt as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : capital lease obligations total debt and capital lease obligations less : current portion debt and capital lease obligations $ 1494627 19681 1514308 $ 1505096 $ 1493969 28492 1522461 $ 1513662 in february 2010 , we issued $ 600.0 million of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 900.0 million of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d and , together with the 2015 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . our proceeds were approximately $ 1.5 billion and were net of an issuance discount of $ 6.6 million . the notes rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in addition , we incurred issuance costs of approximately $ 10.7 million . both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes using the effective interest method . the effective interest rate including the discount and issuance costs is 3.45% ( 3.45 % ) for the 2015 notes and 4.92% ( 4.92 % ) for the 2020 notes . interest is payable semi-annually , in arrears , on february 1 and august 1 , commencing on august 1 , 2010 . during fiscal 2011 interest payments totaled $ 62.3 million . the proceeds from the notes are available for general corporate purposes , including repayment of any balance outstanding on our credit facility . based on quoted market prices , the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 1.6 billion as of december 2 , 2011 . we may redeem the notes at any time , subject to a make whole premium . in addition , upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events , we may be required to repurchase the notes , at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the notes also include covenants that limit our ability to grant liens on assets and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions , subject to significant allowances . as of december 2 , 2011 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . credit agreement in august 2007 , we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement dated february 2007 ( the 201camendment 201d ) , which increased the total senior unsecured revolving facility from $ 500.0 million to $ 1.0 billion . the amendment also permits us to request one-year extensions effective on each anniversary of the closing date of the original agreement , subject to the majority consent of the lenders . we also retain an option to request an additional $ 500.0 million in commitments , for a maximum aggregate facility of $ 1.5 billion . in february 2008 , we entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement dated february 26 , 2008 , which extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to february 16 , 2013 . the facility would terminate at this date if no additional extensions have been requested and granted . all other terms and conditions remain the same . the facility contains a financial covenant requiring us not to exceed a certain maximum leverage ratio . at our option , borrowings under the facility accrue interest based on either the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) for one , two , three or six months , or longer periods with bank consent , plus a margin according to a pricing grid tied to this financial covenant , or a base rate . the margin is set at rates between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.475% ( 0.475 % ) . commitment fees are payable on the facility at rates between 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) and 0.15% ( 0.15 % ) per year based on the same pricing grid . the facility is available to provide loans to us and certain of our subsidiaries for general corporate purposes . on february 1 , 2010 , we paid the outstanding balance on our credit facility and the entire $ 1.0 billion credit line under this facility remains available for borrowing . capital lease obligation in june 2010 , we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement to sell equipment totaling $ 32.2 million and leaseback the same equipment over a period of 43 months . this transaction was classified as a capital lease obligation and recorded at fair value . as of december 2 , 2011 , our capital lease obligations of $ 19.7 million includes $ 9.2 million of current debt . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .\nQuestion: in 2011, what was the amount from the total debt and capital lease obligations included in the section of current liabilities?\nAnswer: 9212.0\nQuestion: and what was that total of debt and obligations?\nAnswer: 1514308.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total was due to that amount?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.00608" } ]
CONVFINQA8435	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating working capital</td><td>$ 2739</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales</td><td>19.5% ( 19.5 % )</td><td>19.2</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr></table> liquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the change in trade receivables from customers between 2010 and 2011?\nAnswer: -0.2\nQuestion: assuming the same trends, what will the 2012 allowance be as a percentage of 4th quarter sales?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "18.1" } ]
CONVFINQA11	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment's operating expenses . results for this segment are dependent upon a number of risks and uncertainties , some of which are discussed below under the heading \"factors that may affect future results and financial condition.\" backlog in the company's experience , the actual amount of product backlog at any particular time is not a meaningful indication of its future business prospects . in particular , backlog often increases in anticipation of or immediately following new product introductions because of over- ordering by dealers anticipating shortages . backlog often is reduced once dealers and customers believe they can obtain sufficient supply . because of the foregoing , backlog cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the company's ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance . further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading \"factors that may affect future results and financial condition.\" gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 . as discussed below , gross margin in 2001 was unusually low resulting from negative gross margin of 2% ( 2 % ) experienced in the first quarter of 2001 . as a percentage of net sales , the company's quarterly gross margins declined during fiscal 2002 from 31% ( 31 % ) in the first quarter down to 26% ( 26 % ) in the fourth quarter . this decline resulted from several factors including a rise in component costs as the year progressed and aggressive pricing by the company across its products lines instituted as a result of continued pricing pressures in the personal computer industry . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2003 in light of weak economic conditions , flat demand for personal computers in general , and the resulting pressure on prices . the foregoing statements regarding anticipated gross margin in 2003 and the general demand for personal computers during 2003 are forward- looking . gross margin could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors , including certain of those set forth below in the subsection entitled \"factors that may affect future results and financial condition.\" there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and potential changes to the company's product mix , including higher unit sales of consumer products with lower average selling prices and lower gross margins . in response to these downward pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company's ability to effectively manage quality problems and warranty costs and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . the company's operating strategy and pricing take into account anticipated changes in foreign currency exchange rates over time ; however , the company's results of operations can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates . the company orders components for its products and builds inventory in advance of product shipments . because the company's markets are volatile and subject to rapid technology and price changes , there is a risk the company will forecast incorrectly and produce or order from third parties excess or insufficient inventories of particular products or components . the company's operating results and financial condition have been in the past and may in the future be materially adversely affected by the company's ability to manage its inventory levels and outstanding purchase commitments and to respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns . gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 . this decline resulted primarily from gross margin of negative 2% ( 2 % ) experienced during the first quarter of 2001 compared to 26% ( 26 % ) gross margin for the same quarter in 2000 . in addition to lower than normal net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5742</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 7983</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>4139</td><td>4128</td><td>5817</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 1603</td><td>$ 1235</td><td>$ 2166</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total of net sales in 2001?\nAnswer: 5363.0\nQuestion: and what was that in 2000?\nAnswer: 7983.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in the total of net sales over the year?\nAnswer: -2620.0\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to that total in 2000, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.3282" } ]
CONVFINQA6693	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 10 . commitments and contingencies credit-related commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments , which are off-balance sheet , include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential loss associated with indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit is equal to the total gross contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following table summarizes the total gross contractual amounts of credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 365251</td><td>$ 324590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asset purchase agreements ( 1 )</td><td>8211</td><td>31780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unfunded commitments to extend credit</td><td>18078</td><td>20981</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4784</td><td>6061</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount for 2009 excludes agreements related to the commercial paper conduits , which were consolidated in may 2009 ; see note 11 . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements . securities finance : on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . we generally indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . in this regard , we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 375.92 billion and $ 333.07 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , presented in the table above . the collateral held by us is invested on behalf of our customers in accordance with their guidelines . in certain cases , the collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the customer against loss of the principal invested . we require the repurchase agreement counterparty to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . of the collateral of $ 375.92 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 333.07 billion at december 31 , 2008 referenced above , $ 77.73 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 68.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements . we held , as agent , cash and securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 82.62 billion and $ 71.87 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 , respectively . legal proceedings : in the ordinary course of business , we and our subsidiaries are involved in disputes , litigation and regulatory inquiries and investigations , both pending and threatened . these matters , if resolved adversely against us , may result in monetary damages , fines and penalties or require changes in our business practices . the resolution of these proceedings is inherently difficult to predict . however , we do not believe that the amount of any judgment , settlement or other action arising from any pending proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , although the outcome of certain of the matters described below may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period in which such matter is resolved .\nQuestion: how much was kept as collateral in 2009?\nAnswer: 375.92\nQuestion: how much was kept as collateral in 2008?\nAnswer: 333.07\nQuestion: what is the difference in value between 2008 and 2009?\nAnswer: 42.85\nQuestion: how much was kept as collateral in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "333.07" } ]
CONVFINQA8006	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n5 . stock based compensation overview maa accounts for its stock based employee compensation plans in accordance with accounting standards governing stock based compensation . these standards require an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the award's fair value on the grant date and recognize the cost over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award , which is generally the vesting period . any liability awards issued are remeasured at each reporting period . maa 2019s stock compensation plans consist of a number of incentives provided to attract and retain independent directors , executive officers and key employees . incentives are currently granted under the second amended and restated 2013 stock incentive plan , or the stock plan , which was approved at the 2018 annual meeting of maa shareholders . the stock plan allows for the grant of restricted stock and stock options up to 2000000 shares . maa believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders . compensation expense is generally recognized for service based restricted stock awards using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the shares regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions . compensation expense for market and performance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in \"general and administrative expenses\" . total compensation expense under the stock plan was $ 12.9 million , $ 10.8 million and $ 12.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was $ 0.5 million , $ 0.2 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was $ 13.5 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.1 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 2.9 million , $ 4.8 million and $ 2.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is provided below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , was $ 71.85 , $ 84.53 and $ 73.20 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free rate</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % ) - 2.14% ( 2.14 % )</td><td>0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )</td><td>0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.884% ( 3.884 % )</td><td>3.573% ( 3.573 % )</td><td>3.634% ( 3.634 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>15.05% ( 15.05 % ) - 17.18% ( 17.18 % )</td><td>20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )</td><td>18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>requisite service period</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td></tr></table> the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the .\nQuestion: what was the change in the dividend yield from 2017 to 2018?\nAnswer: 0.311\nQuestion: and what was that dividend yield in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.573" } ]
CONVFINQA6163	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2006 , we had outstanding 53 mortgage loans that we assumed in connection with various acquisitions . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.6% ( 5.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except with respect to eight loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates , ranging from 3.6% ( 3.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum at of december 31 , 2006 . the fixed rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 7.06% ( 7.06 % ) and the variable rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans had a weighted average maturity of eight years as of december 31 , 2006 . the $ 114.4 variable mortgage debt was repaid in january 2007 . scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2006 , our indebtedness has the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 130206</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>33117</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>372725</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>265915</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>273761</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1261265</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total maturities</td><td>2336989</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less unamortized commission fees and discounts</td><td>-7936 ( 7936 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>senior notes payable and other debt</td><td>$ 2329053</td></tr></table> certain provisions of our long-term debt contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to , among other things : ( i ) incur debt ; ( ii ) make certain dividends , distributions and investments ; ( iii ) enter into certain transactions ; ( iv ) merge , consolidate or transfer certain assets ; and ( v ) sell assets . we and certain of our subsidiaries are also required to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% ( 150 % ) of this group 2019s unsecured debt . derivatives and hedging in the normal course of business , we are exposed to the effect of interest rate changes . we limit these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives . for interest rate exposures , derivatives are used primarily to fix the rate on debt based on floating-rate indices and to manage the cost of borrowing obligations . we currently have an interest rate swap to manage interest rate risk ( the 201cswap 201d ) . we prohibit the use of derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes . further , we have a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors . when viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivative is designed to hedge , we do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our net income or financial position in the future from the use of derivatives. .\nQuestion: what were the maturities in 2010?\nAnswer: 265915.0\nQuestion: and in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "372725.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8727	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nblackrock n 96 n notes in april 2009 , the company acquired $ 2 million of finite- lived management contracts with a five-year estimated useful life associated with the acquisition of the r3 capital partners funds . in december 2009 , in conjunction with the bgi trans- action , the company acquired $ 163 million of finite- lived management contracts with a weighted-average estimated useful life of approximately 10 years . estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is as follows : ( dollar amounts in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 160</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>157</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>156</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>149</td></tr></table> indefinite-lived acquired management contracts on september 29 , 2006 , in conjunction with the mlim transaction , the company acquired indefinite-lived man- agement contracts valued at $ 4477 million consisting of $ 4271 million for all retail mutual funds and $ 206 million for alternative investment products . on october 1 , 2007 , in conjunction with the quellos transaction , the company acquired $ 631 million in indefinite-lived management contracts associated with alternative investment products . on october 1 , 2007 , the company purchased the remain- ing 20% ( 20 % ) of an investment manager of a fund of hedge funds . in conjunction with this transaction , the company recorded $ 8 million in additional indefinite-lived management contracts associated with alternative investment products . on december 1 , 2009 , in conjunction with the bgi transaction , the company acquired $ 9785 million in indefinite-lived management contracts valued consisting primarily for exchange traded funds and common and collective trusts . indefinite-lived acquired trade names/trademarks on december 1 , 2009 , in conjunction with the bgi transaction , the company acquired trade names/ trademarks primarily related to ishares valued at $ 1402.5 million . the fair value was determined using a royalty rate based primarily on normalized marketing and promotion expenditures to develop and support the brands globally . 13 . borrowings short-term borrowings 2007 facility in august 2007 , the company entered into a five-year $ 2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility ( the 201c2007 facility 201d ) , which permits the company to request an additional $ 500 million of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , up to a maximum of $ 3.0 billion . the 2007 facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortiza- tion , where net debt equals total debt less domestic unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2009 . the 2007 facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities . at december 31 , 2009 , the company had $ 200 million outstanding under the 2007 facility with an interest rate of 0.44% ( 0.44 % ) and a maturity date during february 2010 . during february 2010 , the company rolled over $ 100 million in borrowings with an interest rate of 0.43% ( 0.43 % ) and a maturity date in may 2010 . lehman commercial paper inc . has a $ 140 million participation under the 2007 facility ; however blackrock does not expect that lehman commercial paper inc . will honor its commitment to fund additional amounts . bank of america , a related party , has a $ 140 million participation under the 2007 facility . in december 2007 , in order to support two enhanced cash funds that blackrock manages , blackrock elected to procure two letters of credit under the existing 2007 facility in an aggregate amount of $ 100 million . in decem- ber 2008 , the letters of credit were terminated . commercial paper program on october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a com- mercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company may issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3 billion . the proceeds of the commercial paper issuances were used for the financing of a portion of the bgi transaction . subsidiaries of bank of america and barclays , as well as other third parties , act as dealers under the cp program . the cp program is supported by the 2007 facility . the company began issuance of cp notes under the cp program on november 4 , 2009 . as of december 31 , 2009 , blackrock had approximately $ 2 billion of out- standing cp notes with a weighted average interest rate of 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and a weighted average maturity of 23 days . since december 31 , 2009 , the company repaid approxi- mately $ 1.4 billion of cp notes with proceeds from the long-term notes issued in december 2009 . as of march 5 , 2010 , blackrock had $ 596 million of outstanding cp notes with a weighted average interest rate of 0.18% ( 0.18 % ) and a weighted average maturity of 38 days . japan commitment-line in june 2008 , blackrock japan co. , ltd. , a wholly owned subsidiary of the company , entered into a five billion japanese yen commitment-line agreement with a bank- ing institution ( the 201cjapan commitment-line 201d ) . the term of the japan commitment-line was one year and interest accrued at the applicable japanese short-term prime rate . in june 2009 , blackrock japan co. , ltd . renewed the japan commitment-line for a term of one year . the japan commitment-line is intended to provide liquid- ity and flexibility for operating requirements in japan . at december 31 , 2009 , the company had no borrowings outstanding on the japan commitment-line . convertible debentures in february 2005 , the company issued $ 250 million aggregate principal amount of convertible debentures ( the 201cdebentures 201d ) , due in 2035 and bearing interest at a rate of 2.625% ( 2.625 % ) per annum . interest is payable semi- annually in arrears on february 15 and august 15 of each year , and commenced august 15 , 2005 . prior to february 15 , 2009 , the debentures could have been convertible at the option of the holder at a decem- ber 31 , 2008 conversion rate of 9.9639 shares of common stock per one dollar principal amount of debentures under certain circumstances . the debentures would have been convertible into cash and , in some situations as described below , additional shares of the company 2019s common stock , if during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period the trading price per debenture for each day of such period is less than 103% ( 103 % ) of the product of the last reported sales price of blackrock 2019s common stock and the conversion rate of the debentures on each such day or upon the occurrence of certain other corporate events , such as a distribution to the holders of blackrock common stock of certain rights , assets or debt securities , if the company becomes party to a merger , consolidation or transfer of all or substantially all of its assets or a change of control of the company . on february 15 , 2009 , the debentures became convertible into cash at any time prior to maturity at the option of the holder and , in some situations as described below , additional shares of the company 2019s common stock at the current conversion rate . at the time the debentures are tendered for conver- sion , for each one dollar principal amount of debentures converted , a holder shall be entitled to receive cash and shares of blackrock common stock , if any , the aggregate value of which ( the 201cconversion value 201d ) will be deter- mined by multiplying the applicable conversion rate by the average of the daily volume weighted average price of blackrock common stock for each of the ten consecutive trading days beginning on the second trading day imme- diately following the day the debentures are tendered for conversion ( the 201cten-day weighted average price 201d ) . the company will deliver the conversion value to holders as follows : ( 1 ) an amount in cash ( the 201cprincipal return 201d ) equal to the lesser of ( a ) the aggregate conversion value of the debentures to be converted and ( b ) the aggregate principal amount of the debentures to be converted , and ( 2 ) if the aggregate conversion value of the debentures to be converted is greater than the principal return , an amount in shares ( the 201cnet shares 201d ) , determined as set forth below , equal to such aggregate conversion value less the principal return ( the 201cnet share amount 201d ) . the number of net shares to be paid will be determined by dividing the net share amount by the ten-day weighted average price . in lieu of delivering fractional shares , the company will deliver cash based on the ten-day weighted average price . the conversion rate for the debentures is subject to adjustments upon the occurrence of certain corporate events , such as a change of control of the company , 193253ti_txt.indd 96 4/2/10 1:18 pm .\nQuestion: what was the change in estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets from 2010 to 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9019	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfuture payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes . 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes . 2017 notes . in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) . a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund-of-funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year . the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2017 notes . 13 . commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 . future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>112</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>404</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1038</td></tr></table> rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 134 million , $ 136 million and $ 132 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . investment commitments . at december 31 , 2016 , the company had $ 192 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . these funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds . this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds . in addition to the capital commitments of $ 192 million , the company had approximately $ 12 million of contingent commitments for certain funds which have investment periods that have expired . generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment . these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding . the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients . contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions . in connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products . the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2016 totaled $ 115 million and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial condition . other contingent payments . the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of derivative transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million between the company and counterparty . see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion . legal proceedings . from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s . federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with .\nQuestion: what portion of the future minimum commitments is due in 12 months?\nAnswer: 0.1368\nQuestion: what is the value of the fund for various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment?\nAnswer: 192.0\nQuestion: what is the total minimum future commitments as of 31 december 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1038.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8702	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ngoodwill is reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment . in addition , the company performs an impairment analysis of other intangible assets based on the occurrence of other factors . such factors include , but are not limited to , signifi- cant changes in membership , state funding , medical contracts and provider networks and contracts . an impairment loss is rec- ognized if the carrying value of intangible assets exceeds the implied fair value . the company did not recognize any impair- ment losses for the periods presented . medical claims liabilities medical services costs include claims paid , claims reported but not yet paid ( inventory ) , estimates for claims incurred but not yet received ( ibnr ) and estimates for the costs necessary to process unpaid claims . the estimates of medical claims liabilities are developed using standard actuarial methods based upon historical data for payment patterns , cost trends , product mix , seasonality , utiliza- tion of healthcare services and other relevant factors including product changes . these estimates are continually reviewed and adjustments , if necessary , are reflected in the period known . management did not change actuarial methods during the years presented . management believes the amount of medical claims payable is reasonable and adequate to cover the company 2019s liabil- ity for unpaid claims as of december 31 , 2005 ; however , actual claim payments may differ from established estimates . revenue recognition the majority of the company 2019s medicaid managed care premi- um revenue is received monthly based on fixed rates per member as determined by state contracts . some contracts allow for addi- tional premium related to certain supplemental services provided such as maternity deliveries . revenue is recognized as earned over the covered period of services . revenues are recorded based on membership and eligibility data provided by the states , which may be adjusted by the states for updates to this membership and eligibility data . these adjustments are immaterial in relation to total revenue recorded and are reflected in the period known . premiums collected in advance are recorded as unearned revenue . the specialty services segment generates revenue under con- tracts with state and local government entities , our health plans and third-party customers . revenues for services are recognized when the services are provided or as ratably earned over the cov- ered period of services . for performance-based contracts , the company does not recognize revenue subject to refund until data is sufficient to measure performance . such amounts are recorded as unearned revenue . revenues due to the company are recorded as premium and related receivables and recorded net of an allowance for uncol- lectible accounts based on historical trends and management 2019s judgment on the collectibility of these accounts . activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowances beginning of year</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 219</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>80</td><td>407</td><td>472</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs of uncollectible receivables</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>-552 ( 552 )</td><td>-84 ( 84 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allowances end of year</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td></tr></table> significant customers centene receives the majority of its revenues under contracts or subcontracts with state medicaid managed care programs . the contracts , which expire on various dates between june 30 , 2006 and august 31 , 2008 , are expected to be renewed . contracts with the states of indiana , kansas , texas and wisconsin each accounted for 18% ( 18 % ) , 12% ( 12 % ) , 22% ( 22 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , of the company 2019s revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . reinsurance centene has purchased reinsurance from third parties to cover eligible healthcare services . the current reinsurance program covers 90% ( 90 % ) of inpatient healthcare expenses in excess of annual deductibles of $ 300 per member , up to a lifetime maximum of $ 2000 . centene 2019s medicaid managed care subsidiaries are respon- sible for inpatient charges in excess of an average daily per diem . reinsurance recoveries were $ 4014 , $ 3730 , and $ 5345 , in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4105 , $ 6724 , and $ 6185 in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance recoveries , net of expenses , are included in medical costs . other income ( expense ) other income ( expense ) consists principally of investment income and interest expense . investment income is derived from the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , restricted deposits and investments . interest expense relates to borrowings under our credit facility , mortgage interest , interest on capital leases and credit facility fees . income taxes deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases . deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled . the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of the tax rate change . valuation allowances are provided when it is considered more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized . in determining if a deductible temporary difference or net operating loss can be realized , the company considers future reversals of .\nQuestion: what were the allowances at the beginning of the year in 2005?\nAnswer: 462.0\nQuestion: and in 2004?\nAnswer: 607.0\nQuestion: so what is the difference in this value between the two years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-145.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2962	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nareas exceeding 14.1 million acres ( 5.7 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods production , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of the temple-inland packaging operations from the date of acquisition in february 2012 and the results of the brazil packaging business from the date of acquisition in january 2013 . in addition , due to the acquisition of a majority share of olmuksa international paper sabanci ambalaj sanayi ve ticaret a.s. , ( now called olmuksan international paper or olmuksan ) net sales for our corrugated packaging business in turkey are included in the business segment totals beginning in the first quarter of 2013 and the operating profits reflect a higher ownership percentage than in previous years . net sales for 2013 increased 12% ( 12 % ) to $ 14.8 billion compared with $ 13.3 billion in 2012 , and 42% ( 42 % ) compared with $ 10.4 billion in 2011 . operating profits were 69% ( 69 % ) higher in 2013 than in 2012 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than in 2011 . excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , the divestiture of three containerboard mills and other special items , operating profits in 2013 were 36% ( 36 % ) higher than in 2012 and 59% ( 59 % ) higher than in 2011 . benefits from the net impact of higher average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix ( $ 749 million ) were offset by lower sales volumes ( $ 73 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 64 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 16 million ) and higher input costs ( $ 102 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2013 include costs of $ 62 million associated with the integration of temple-inland , a gain of $ 13 million related to a bargain purchase adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey , and a net gain of $ 1 million for other items , while operating profits in 2012 included costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging business of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 14810</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1801</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging net sales were $ 12.5 billion in 2013 compared with $ 11.6 billion in 2012 and $ 8.6 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 1.8 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with the integration of temple-inland and other special items ) compared with $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 . sales volumes decreased in 2013 compared with 2012 reflecting flat demand for boxes and the impact of commercial decisions . average sales price realizations were significantly higher mainly due to the realization of price increases for domestic containerboard and boxes . input costs were higher for wood , energy and recycled fiber . freight costs also increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2012 . manufacturing operating costs decreased , but were offset by inflation and higher overhead and distribution costs . the business took about 850000 tons of total downtime in 2013 of which about 450000 were market- related and 400000 were maintenance downtime . in 2012 , the business took about 945000 tons of total downtime of which about 580000 were market-related and about 365000 were maintenance downtime . operating profits in 2013 included $ 62 million of costs associated with the integration of temple-inland . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . looking ahead to 2014 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to increase for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days offset by the impact from the severe winter weather events impacting much of the u.s . input costs are expected to be higher for energy , recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime spending is expected to be about $ 51 million higher with outages scheduled at six mills compared with four mills in the 2013 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . however , operating profits will be negatively impacted by the adverse winter weather in the first quarter of 2014 . emea industrial packaging net sales in 2013 include the sales of our packaging operations in turkey which are now fully consolidated . net sales were $ 1.3 billion in 2013 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 43 million ( $ 32 .\nQuestion: what was the value of north american industrial packaging net sales in 2013?\nAnswer: 12.5\nQuestion: what is that value multiplied by 1000?\nAnswer: 12500.0\nQuestion: what were the sales in 2013?\nAnswer: 14810.0\nQuestion: what is the proportion of sales attributed to na industrial packaging?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.84402" } ]
CONVFINQA10536	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements lending commitments the firm 2019s lending commitments are agreements to lend with fixed termination dates and depend on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to borrowing . these commitments are presented net of amounts syndicated to third parties . the total commitment amount does not necessarily reflect actual future cash flows because the firm may syndicate all or substantial additional portions of these commitments . in addition , commitments can expire unused or be reduced or cancelled at the counterparty 2019s request . the table below presents information about lending commitments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>held for investment</td><td>$ 120997</td><td>$ 124504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>held for sale</td><td>8602</td><td>9838</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>at fair value</td><td>7983</td><td>9404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 137582</td><td>$ 143746</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 held for investment lending commitments are accounted for on an accrual basis . see note 9 for further information about such commitments . 2030 held for sale lending commitments are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value . 2030 gains or losses related to lending commitments at fair value , if any , are generally recorded , net of any fees in other principal transactions . 2030 substantially all lending commitments relates to the firm 2019s investing & lending segment . commercial lending . the firm 2019s commercial lending commitments were primarily extended to investment-grade corporate borrowers . such commitments included $ 93.99 billion as of december 2018 and $ 85.98 billion as of december 2017 , related to relationship lending activities ( principally used for operating and general corporate purposes ) and $ 27.92 billion as of december 2018 and $ 42.41 billion as of december 2017 , related to other investment banking activities ( generally extended for contingent acquisition financing and are often intended to be short-term in nature , as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources ) . the firm also extends lending commitments in connection with other types of corporate lending , as well as commercial real estate financing . see note 9 for further information about funded loans . sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 15.52 billion as of december 2018 and $ 25.70 billion as of december 2017 . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.0 billion , of which $ 550 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2018 and december 2017 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of consumer and corporate loans . contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements / forward starting collateralized financings forward starting collateralized agreements includes resale and securities borrowing agreements , and forward starting collateralized financings includes repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . letters of credit the firm has commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements . investment commitments investment commitments includes commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . investment commitments included $ 2.42 billion as of december 2018 and $ 2.09 billion as of december 2017 , related to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k 159 .\nQuestion: what is the commercial lending commitments in 2018?\nAnswer: 93.99\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\nAnswer: 85.98\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 8.01\nQuestion: what about the net change in the commercial lending commitments held for investment from 2017 to 2018?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-3507.0" } ]
CONVFINQA697	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2014 to 2013 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013 net revenue</td><td>$ 5524</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>miso deferral</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 5735</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2013 and july 2014 . energy efficiency revenues are offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have minimal effect on net income ; 2022 the effect of the apsc 2019s order in entergy arkansas 2019s 2013 rate case , including an annual base rate increase effective january 2014 offset by a miso rider to provide customers credits in rates for transmission revenue received through miso ; 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mspc , effective september 2013 ; 2022 an increase in entergy mississippi 2019s storm damage rider , as approved by the mpsc , effective october 2013 . the increase in the storm damage rider is offset by other operation and maintenance expenses and has no effect on net income ; 2022 an annual base rate increase at entergy texas , effective april 2014 , as a result of the puct 2019s order in the september 2013 rate case ; and 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate proceedings . the asset retirement obligation affects net revenue because entergy records a regulatory debit or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation- related costs collected in revenue . the variance is primarily caused by increases in regulatory credits because of decreases in decommissioning trust earnings and increases in depreciation and accretion expenses and increases in regulatory credits to realign the asset retirement obligation regulatory assets with regulatory treatment . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 3129 gwh , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in billed electricity usage primarily due to an increase in sales to industrial customers and the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansions , recovery of a major refining customer from an unplanned outage in 2013 , and continued moderate growth in the manufacturing sector . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of the non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc , partially offset by the deferral in april 2013 , as approved by the apsc , of costs incurred from march 2010 through december 2012 related to the transition and implementation of joining the miso .\nQuestion: what was the net revenue in 2014?\nAnswer: 5735.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013?\nAnswer: 5524.0\nQuestion: by how much, then, did it change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "211.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10980	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrepublic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) high quality financial institutions . such balances may be in excess of fdic insured limits . to manage the related credit exposure , we continually monitor the credit worthiness of the financial institutions where we have deposits . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we provide services , as well as the dispersion of our operations across many geographic areas . we provide services to small-container , large-container , municipal and residential , and energy services customers in the united states and puerto rico . we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers , but generally do not require collateral to support customer receivables . we establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors including the credit risk of specific customers , age of receivables outstanding , historical trends , economic conditions and other information . accounts receivable , net accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal , energy services and other services . our receivables are recorded when billed or when the related revenue is earned , if earlier , and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash . the carrying value of our receivables , net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , represents their estimated net realizable value . provisions for doubtful accounts are evaluated on a monthly basis and are recorded based on our historical collection experience , the age of the receivables , specific customer information and economic conditions . we also review outstanding balances on an account-specific basis . in general , reserves are provided for accounts receivable in excess of 90 days outstanding . past due receivable balances are written-off when our collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting amounts due . the following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td><td>$ 38.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions charged to expense</td><td>30.6</td><td>20.4</td><td>22.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accounts written-off</td><td>-35.7 ( 35.7 )</td><td>-23.1 ( 23.1 )</td><td>-14.9 ( 14.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 38.9</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td></tr></table> restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 141.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities of which $ 71.4 million supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability . additionally , we obtain funds through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds for the purpose of financing qualifying expenditures at our landfills , transfer stations , collection and recycling centers . the funds are deposited directly into trust accounts by the bonding authorities at the time of issuance . as the use of these funds is contractually restricted , and we do not have the ability to use these funds for general operating purposes , they are classified as restricted cash and marketable securities in our consolidated balance sheets . in the normal course of business , we may be required to provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities in connection with municipal residential collection contracts , closure or post- closure of landfills , environmental remediation , environmental permits , and business licenses and permits as a financial guarantee of our performance . at several of our landfills , we satisfy financial assurance requirements by depositing cash into restricted trust funds or escrow accounts . property and equipment we record property and equipment at cost . expenditures for major additions and improvements to facilities are capitalized , while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred . when property is retired or .\nQuestion: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2016?\nAnswer: 44.0\nQuestion: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2017?\nAnswer: 46.7\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-2.7" } ]
CONVFINQA1680	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the total current assets in 2007?\nAnswer: 1187.4\nQuestion: and for 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1113.2" } ]
CONVFINQA1109	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis the table below presents the operating results of our institutional client services segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td><td>year ended december 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fixed income currency and commodities client execution</td><td>$ 9914</td><td>$ 9018</td><td>$ 13707</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equities client execution1</td><td>3171</td><td>3031</td><td>3231</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commissions and fees</td><td>3053</td><td>3633</td><td>3426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities services</td><td>1986</td><td>1598</td><td>1432</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total equities</td><td>8210</td><td>8262</td><td>8089</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>18124</td><td>17280</td><td>21796</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>12480</td><td>12837</td><td>14994</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>pre-tax earnings</td><td>$ 5644</td><td>$ 4443</td><td>$ 6802</td></tr></table> 1 . includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively . 2012 versus 2011 . net revenues in institutional client services were $ 18.12 billion for 2012 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2011 . net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 9.91 billion for 2012 , 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2011 . these results reflected strong net revenues in mortgages , which were significantly higher compared with 2011 . in addition , net revenues in credit products and interest rate products were solid and higher compared with 2011 . these increases were partially offset by significantly lower net revenues in commodities and slightly lower net revenues in currencies . although broad market concerns persisted during 2012 , fixed income , currency and commodities client execution operated in a generally improved environment characterized by tighter credit spreads and less challenging market-making conditions compared with 2011 . net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . net revenues in securities services were significantly higher compared with 2011 , reflecting a gain of approximately $ 500 million on the sale of our hedge fund administration business . in addition , equities client execution net revenues were higher than 2011 , primarily reflecting significantly higher results in cash products , principally due to increased levels of client activity . these increases were offset by lower commissions and fees , reflecting lower market volumes . during 2012 , equities operated in an environment generally characterized by an increase in global equity prices and lower volatility levels . the net loss attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 714 million ( $ 433 million and $ 281 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2012 , compared with a net gain of $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 . during 2012 , institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by continued broad market concerns and uncertainties , although positive developments helped to improve market conditions . these developments included certain central bank actions to ease monetary policy and address funding risks for european financial institutions . in addition , the u.s . economy posted stable to improving economic data , including favorable developments in unemployment and housing . these improvements resulted in tighter credit spreads , higher global equity prices and lower levels of volatility . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and continued political uncertainty , particularly the political debate in the united states surrounding the fiscal cliff , generally resulted in client risk aversion and lower activity levels . also , uncertainty over financial regulatory reform persisted . if these concerns and uncertainties continue over the long term , net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 12.48 billion for 2012 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2011 , primarily due to lower brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , and lower impairment charges , partially offset by higher net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings . pre-tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 . 2011 versus 2010 . net revenues in institutional client services were $ 17.28 billion for 2011 , 21% ( 21 % ) lower than 2010 . net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 9.02 billion for 2011 , 34% ( 34 % ) lower than 2010 . although activity levels during 2011 were generally consistent with 2010 levels , and results were solid during the first quarter of 2011 , the environment during the remainder of 2011 was characterized by broad market concerns and uncertainty , resulting in volatile markets and significantly wider credit spreads , which contributed to difficult market-making conditions and led to reductions in risk by us and our clients . as a result of these conditions , net revenues across the franchise were lower , including significant declines in mortgages and credit products , compared with 2010 . 54 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .\nQuestion: what was the total of net revenues related to reinsurance in 2012, in billions of dollars?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.08" } ]
CONVFINQA2169	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents the company uses some custom components that are not commonly used by its competitors , and new products introduced by the company often utilize custom components available from only one source . when a component or product uses new technologies , initial capacity constraints may exist until the suppliers 2019 yields have matured or manufacturing capacity has increased . if the company 2019s supply of components for a new or existing product were delayed or constrained , or if an outsourcing partner delayed shipments of completed products to the company , the company 2019s financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected . the company 2019s business and financial performance could also be materially adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source , or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source . continued availability of these components at acceptable prices , or at all , may be affected if those suppliers concentrated on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the company 2019s requirements . the company has entered into agreements for the supply of many components ; however , there can be no guarantee that the company will be able to extend or renew these agreements on similar terms , or at all . therefore , the company remains subject to significant risks of supply shortages and price increases that could materially adversely affect its financial condition and operating results . substantially all of the company 2019s hardware products are manufactured by outsourcing partners that are located primarily in asia . a significant concentration of this manufacturing is currently performed by a small number of outsourcing partners , often in single locations . certain of these outsourcing partners are the sole- sourced suppliers of components and manufacturers for many of the company 2019s products . although the company works closely with its outsourcing partners on manufacturing schedules , the company 2019s operating results could be adversely affected if its outsourcing partners were unable to meet their production commitments . the company 2019s purchase commitments typically cover its requirements for periods up to 150 days . other off-balance sheet commitments operating leases the company leases various equipment and facilities , including retail space , under noncancelable operating lease arrangements . the company does not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements . the major facility leases are typically for terms not exceeding 10 years and generally contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 26 , 2015 , the company had a total of 463 retail stores . leases for retail space are for terms ranging from five to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 26 , 2015 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 6.3 billion , of which $ 3.6 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 794 million , $ 717 million and $ 645 million in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 26 , 2015 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 772</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>744</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>715</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>674</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2592</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 6271</td></tr></table> other commitments the company utilizes several outsourcing partners to manufacture sub-assemblies for the company 2019s products and to perform final assembly and testing of finished products . these outsourcing partners acquire components and build product based on demand information supplied by the company , which typically covers periods up to 150 days . the company also obtains individual components for its products from a wide variety of individual suppliers . consistent with industry practice , the company acquires components through a combination of purchase orders , supplier contracts and open orders based on projected demand information . where appropriate , the purchases are applied to inventory component prepayments that are outstanding with the respective supplier . as of september 26 , 2015 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 29.5 billion . apple inc . \| 2015 form 10-k \| 65 .\nQuestion: what was the sum of rent expense under all operating leases in 2015 and 2014?\nAnswer: 1511.0\nQuestion: what was the rent expense in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "645.0" } ]
CONVFINQA726	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .\nQuestion: what was the average value of de@r in 2002?\nAnswer: 10.8\nQuestion: what was the average value of de@r in 2001?\nAnswer: 6.4\nQuestion: what is the difference?\nAnswer: 4.4\nQuestion: what was the average value of de@r in 2001?\nAnswer: 6.4\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.6875" } ]
CONVFINQA842	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 105</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 198</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>126</td><td>146</td><td>149</td><td>172</td><td>228</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>132</td><td>109</td><td>141</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>98</td><td>121</td><td>93</td><td>122</td><td>168</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the state street corporation value in 2013?\nAnswer: 198.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "100.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8033	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndevon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2015 ( mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2014</td><td>305</td><td>384</td><td>689</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>13</td><td>11</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>-115 ( 115 )</td><td>80</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-80 ( 80 )</td><td>-120 ( 120 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-88 ( 88 )</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td><td>-182 ( 182 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2015</td><td>75</td><td>301</td><td>376</td></tr></table> proved undeveloped reserves decreased 45% ( 45 % ) from year-end 2014 to year-end 2015 , and the year-end 2015 balance represents 17% ( 17 % ) of total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 24 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 182 mmboe , or 26% ( 26 % ) , of the 2014 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred to develop and convert devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were approximately $ 2.2 billion for 2015 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 120 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain properties in the u.s . and canada . the largest revisions , which reduced reserves by 80 mmboe , relate to evaluations of jackfish bitumen reserves . of the 40 mmboe revisions recorded for u.s . properties , a reduction of approximately 27 mmboe represents reserves that devon now does not expect to develop in the next five years , including 20 mmboe attributable to the eagle ford . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2015 related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 301 mmboe and 384 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35 mbbl daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity and steam-oil ratios . furthermore , development of these projects involves the up-front construction of steam injection/distribution and bitumen processing facilities . due to the large up-front capital investments and large reserves required to provide economic returns , the project conditions meet the specific circumstances requiring a period greater than 5 years for conversion to developed reserves . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends through to 2030 . at the end of 2015 , approximately 184 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at jackfish have remained undeveloped for five years or more since the initial booking . no other projects have proved undeveloped reserves that have remained undeveloped more than five years from the initial booking of the reserves . furthermore , approximately 180 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at jackfish will require in excess of five years , from the date of this filing , to develop . price revisions 2015 2013 reserves decreased 302 mmboe primarily due to lower commodity prices across all products . the lower bitumen price increased canadian reserves due to the decline in royalties , which increases devon 2019s after- royalty volumes . 2014 2013 reserves increased 9 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices in the barnett shale and the anadarko basin , partially offset by higher bitumen prices , which result in lower after-royalty volumes , in canada. .\nQuestion: what percentage does the year-end 2015 balance represent in relation to the total proved reserves?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "17.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9941	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmutual and pooled funds shares of mutual funds are valued at the net asset value ( nav ) quoted on the exchange where the fund is traded and are classified as level 1 assets . units of pooled funds are valued at the per unit nav determined by the fund manager and are classified as level 2 assets . the investments are utilizing nav as a practical expedient for fair value . corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . mortgage and asset-backed securities mortgage and asset 2013backed securities are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields , credit ratings , and purpose of the underlying loan . real estate pooled funds real estate pooled funds are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying properties . estimated fair value is calculated utilizing a combination of key inputs , such as revenue and expense growth rates , terminal capitalization rates , and discount rates . these key inputs are consistent with practices prevailing within the real estate investment management industry . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying investments . the underlying investments are valued based on bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data , including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2015 were $ 137.5 . contributions resulted primarily from an assessment of long-term funding requirements of the plans and tax planning . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements and cost reduction actions . we anticipate contributing $ 100 to $ 120 to the defined benefit pension plans in 2016 . these contributions are driven primarily by benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements and actions to reorganize the business . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>international</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 129.0</td><td>$ 52.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>135.8</td><td>53.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>142.2</td><td>55.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>149.6</td><td>57.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>157.4</td><td>57.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2021 20132025</td><td>917.9</td><td>332.3</td></tr></table> these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates. .\nQuestion: what were the total projected benefit payments for the five year period ended in 2025?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "917.9" } ]
CONVFINQA8997	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nschlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>acquisition of smith international inc .</td><td>100</td><td>76</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>8</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1434</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>1361</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .\nQuestion: what is the sum of balances of outstanding shares for 2009 and 2010?\nAnswer: 2556.0\nQuestion: what is the average?\nAnswer: 1278.0\nQuestion: what about the sum of balances of outstanding shares for december 2008 and december 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2389.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7426	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncapitalized software : internally developed computer software costs and costs of product enhancements are capitalized subsequent to the determination of technological feasibility ; such capitalization continues until the product becomes available for commercial release . judgment is required in determining when technological feasibility of a product is established . the company has determined that technological feasibility is reached after all high-risk development issues have been resolved through coding and testing . generally , the time between the establishment of technological feasibility and commercial release of software is minimal , resulting in insignificant or no capitalization of internally developed software costs . amortization of capitalized software costs , both for internally developed as well as for purchased software products , is computed on a product-by-product basis over the estimated economic life of the product , which is generally three years . amortization is the greater of the amount computed using : ( i ) the ratio of the current year 2019s gross revenue to the total current and anticipated future gross revenue for that product or ( ii ) the straight-line method over the estimated life of the product . amortization expense related to capitalized and acquired software costs , including the related trademarks , was $ 40.9 million , $ 33.7 million and $ 32.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the company periodically reviews the carrying value of capitalized software . impairments are recognized in the results of operations when the expected future undiscounted operating cash flow derived from the capitalized costs of internally developed software is less than the carrying value . no impairment charges have been required to date . goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of net identifiable assets acquired . intangible assets consist of trademarks , customer lists , contract backlog , and acquired software and technology . the company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually by performing a qualitative assessment of whether there is sufficient evidence that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount . the application of a qualitative assessment requires the company to assess and make judgments regarding a variety of factors which potentially impact the fair value of a reporting unit , including general economic conditions , industry and market-specific conditions , customer behavior , cost factors , the company 2019s financial performance and trends , the company 2019s strategies and business plans , capital requirements , management and personnel issues , and the company 2019s stock price , among others . the company then considers the totality of these and other factors , placing more weight on the events and circumstances that are judged to most affect a reporting unit 2019s fair value or the carrying amount of its net assets , to reach a qualitative conclusion regarding whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount . if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value , no further analysis is necessary . if it is determined that it is more likely than not the reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value , a quantitative two-step analysis is performed where the fair value of the reporting unit is estimated and the impairment loss , if any , is recorded . the company tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually by comparing the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value . the company performs its annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment test on january 1 of each year unless there is an indicator that would require a test during the year . the company periodically reviews the carrying value of other intangible assets and will recognize impairments when events or circumstances indicate that such assets may be impaired . no impairment charges have been required to date for the company's goodwill and other intangible assets . concentrations of credit risk : the company has a concentration of credit risk with respect to revenue and trade receivables due to the use of certain significant channel partners to market and sell the company 2019s products . the company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers 2019 financial condition and generally does not require collateral . the following table outlines concentrations of risk with respect to the company 2019s revenue: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( as a % ( % ) of revenue except customer data )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue from channel partners</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>largest channel partner</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2ndlargest channel partner</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>direct sale customers exceeding 5% ( 5 % ) of revenue</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> table of contents .\nQuestion: what was amortization expense related to capitalized and acquired software costs, including the related trademarks in 2012?\nAnswer: 40.9\nQuestion: what was the cost in 2011?\nAnswer: 33.7\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 74.6\nQuestion: what is the sum including the costs from 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "107.4" } ]
CONVFINQA7720	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 116</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>inventory</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>2549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intangible assets 2014indefinite-lived</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>regulatory assets</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other noncurrent assets</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-401 ( 401 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-recourse debt</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>regulatory liabilities</td><td>-117 ( 117 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>redeemable preferred stock</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>net identifiable assets acquired</td><td>994</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>goodwill</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2011 , the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded at provisional amounts based on the preliminary purchase price allocation . the company is in the process of obtaining additional information to identify and measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition within the measurement period , which could be up to one year from the date of acquisition . such provisional amounts will be retrospectively adjusted to reflect any new information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that , if known , would have affected the measurement of these amounts . additionally , key input assumptions and their sensitivity to the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are currently being reviewed by management . it is likely that the value of the generation business related property , plant and equipment , the intangible asset related to the electric security plan with its regulated customers and long-term coal contracts , the 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) equity ownership interest in the ohio valley electric corporation , and deferred taxes could change as the valuation process is finalized . dpler , dpl 2019s wholly-owned competitive retail electric service ( 201ccres 201d ) provider , will also likely have changes in its initial purchase price allocation for the valuation of its intangible assets for the trade name , and customer relationships and contracts . as noted in the table above , the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in the recognition of $ 2.5 billion of goodwill . factors primarily contributing to a price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets include , but are not limited to : the ability to expand the u.s . utility platform in the mid-west market , the ability to capitalize on utility management experience gained from ipl , enhanced ability to negotiate with suppliers of fuel and energy , the ability to capture value associated with aes 2019 u.s . tax position , a well- positioned generating fleet , the ability of dpl to leverage its assembled workforce to take advantage of growth opportunities , etc . our ability to realize the benefit of dpl 2019s goodwill depends on the realization of expected benefits resulting from a successful integration of dpl into aes 2019 existing operations and our ability to respond to the changes in the ohio utility market . for example , utilities in ohio continue to face downward pressure on operating margins due to the evolving regulatory environment , which is moving towards a market-based competitive pricing mechanism . at the same time , the declining energy prices are also reducing operating .\nQuestion: what amount of the net assets acquired is from goodwill?\nAnswer: 2489.0\nQuestion: and what is the total of those net assets acquired?\nAnswer: 3483.0\nQuestion: what, then, is that amount as a percentage of this total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.71461" } ]
CONVFINQA8612	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe authorized costs of $ 76 are to be recovered via a surcharge over a twenty-year period beginning october 2012 . surcharges collected as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were $ 4 and $ 5 , respectively . in addition to the authorized costs , the company expects to incur additional costs totaling $ 34 , which will be recovered from contributions made by the california state coastal conservancy . contributions collected as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were $ 8 and $ 5 , respectively . regulatory balancing accounts accumulate differences between revenues recognized and authorized revenue requirements until they are collected from customers or are refunded . regulatory balancing accounts include low income programs and purchased power and water accounts . debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues . call premiums on the redemption of long- term debt , as well as unamortized debt expense , are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates . purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the company 2019s california subsidiary during 2002 , and acquisitions in 2007 by the company 2019s new jersey subsidiary . as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 . tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from five to fifteen years , as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service . other regulatory assets include certain deferred business transformation costs , construction costs for treatment facilities , property tax stabilization , employee-related costs , business services project expenses , coastal water project costs , rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others . these costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods . regulatory liabilities the regulatory liabilities generally represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts that are to be credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process . the following table summarizes the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>removal costs recovered through rates</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 301</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefitbalancing accounts</td><td>59</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>32</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total regulatory liabilities</td><td>$ 402</td><td>$ 392</td></tr></table> removal costs recovered through rates are estimated costs to retire assets at the end of their expected useful life that are recovered through customer rates over the life of the associated assets . in december 2008 , the company 2019s subsidiary in new jersey , at the direction of the new jersey puc , began to depreciate $ 48 of the total balance into depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated statements of operations via straight line amortization through november 2048 . pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts represent the difference between costs incurred and costs authorized by the puc 2019s that are expected to be refunded to customers. .\nQuestion: what was the total of removal costs in 2015?\nAnswer: 311.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "301.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9712	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n14 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 included $ 2754 million , net of $ 927 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2024 million , net of $ 869 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2009 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capital leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 576</td><td>$ 290</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>570</td><td>292</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>488</td><td>247</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>425</td><td>256</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>352</td><td>267</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>2901</td><td>1623</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5312</td><td>$ 2975</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-914 ( 914 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 2061</td></tr></table> the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 686 million in 2009 , $ 747 million in 2008 , and $ 810 million in 2007 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 15 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us in measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at .\nQuestion: in 2009, what was the amount of the current liabilities related to operating leases?\nAnswer: 576.0\nQuestion: and what was the full total of those leases?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5312.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4757	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company recorded equity earnings , net of taxes , related to ilim of $ 290 million in 2018 , compared with earnings of $ 183 million in 2017 , and $ 199 million in 2016 . operating results recorded in 2018 included an after-tax non-cash foreign exchange loss of $ 82 million , compared with an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 15 million in 2017 and an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 25 million in 2016 , primarily on the remeasurement of ilim's u.s . dollar denominated net debt . ilim delivered outstanding performance in 2018 , driven largely by higher price realization and strong demand . sales volumes for the joint venture increased year over year for shipments to china of softwood pulp and linerboard , but were offset by decreased sales of hardwood pulp to china . sales volumes in the russian market increased for softwood pulp and hardwood pulp , but decreased for linerboard . average sales price realizations were significantly higher in 2018 for sales of softwood pulp , hardwood pulp and linerboard to china and other export markets . average sales price realizations in russian markets increased year over year for all products . input costs were higher in 2018 , primarily for wood , fuel and chemicals . distribution costs were negatively impacted by tariffs and inflation . the company received cash dividends from the joint venture of $ 128 million in 2018 , $ 133 million in 2017 and $ 58 million in entering the first quarter of 2019 , sales volumes are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2018 , due to the seasonal slowdown in china and fewer trading days . based on pricing to date in the current quarter , average sales prices are expected to decrease for hardwood pulp , softwood pulp and linerboard to china . input costs are projected to be relatively flat , while distribution costs are expected to increase . equity earnings - gpip international paper recorded equity earnings of $ 46 million on its 20.5% ( 20.5 % ) ownership position in gpip in 2018 . the company received cash dividends from the investment of $ 25 million in 2018 . liquidity and capital resources overview a major factor in international paper 2019s liquidity and capital resource planning is its generation of operating cash flow , which is highly sensitive to changes in the pricing and demand for our major products . while changes in key cash operating costs , such as energy , raw material , mill outage and transportation costs , do have an effect on operating cash generation , we believe that our focus on pricing and cost controls has improved our cash flow generation over an operating cycle . cash uses during 2018 were primarily focused on working capital requirements , capital spending , debt reductions and returning cash to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases under the company's share repurchase program . cash provided by operating activities cash provided by operations , including discontinued operations , totaled $ 3.2 billion in 2018 , compared with $ 1.8 billion for 2017 , and $ 2.5 billion for 2016 . cash used by working capital components ( accounts receivable , contract assets and inventory less accounts payable and accrued liabilities , interest payable and other ) totaled $ 439 million in 2018 , compared with cash used by working capital components of $ 402 million in 2017 , and cash provided by working capital components of $ 71 million in 2016 . investment activities including discontinued operations , investment activities in 2018 increased from 2017 , as 2018 included higher capital spending . in 2016 , investment activity included the purchase of weyerhaeuser's pulp business for $ 2.2 billion in cash , the purchase of the holmen business for $ 57 million in cash , net of cash acquired , and proceeds from the sale of the asia packaging business of $ 108 million , net of cash divested . the company maintains an average capital spending target around depreciation and amortization levels , or modestly above , due to strategic plans over the course of an economic cycle . capital spending was $ 1.6 billion in 2018 , or 118% ( 118 % ) of depreciation and amortization , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2017 , or 98% ( 98 % ) of depreciation and amortization , and $ 1.3 billion , or 110% ( 110 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2016 . across our segments , capital spending as a percentage of depreciation and amortization ranged from 69.8% ( 69.8 % ) to 132.1% ( 132.1 % ) in 2018 . the following table shows capital spending for operations by business segment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , excluding amounts related to discontinued operations of $ 111 million in 2017 and $ 107 million in 2016. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial packaging</td><td>$ 1061</td><td>$ 836</td><td>$ 832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>global cellulose fibers</td><td>183</td><td>188</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>printing papers</td><td>303</td><td>235</td><td>215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>subtotal</td><td>1547</td><td>1259</td><td>1221</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>25</td><td>21</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>capital spending</td><td>$ 1572</td><td>$ 1280</td><td>$ 1241</td></tr></table> capital expenditures in 2019 are currently expected to be about $ 1.4 billion , or 104% ( 104 % ) of depreciation and amortization , including approximately $ 400 million of strategic investments. .\nQuestion: what is the ratio of industrial packaging in 2018 to 2017?\nAnswer: 1.26914\nQuestion: what is that less 1?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.26914" } ]
CONVFINQA3270	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of the s&p index in 2013?\nAnswer: 161.0\nQuestion: and what was the change in its value since 2008?\nAnswer: 61.0\nQuestion: in that same six year period, what was the change in the value of the apple inc . stock?\nAnswer: 331.0\nQuestion: and how much did this change represent in relation to that value in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.31" } ]
CONVFINQA1844	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock-based compensation 2013 we have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options , nonvested retention shares , and nonvested stock units . we refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as 201cretention awards 201d . we issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings , while new shares are issued when retention shares vest . we adopted fasb statement no . 123 ( r ) , share-based payment ( fas 123 ( r ) ) , on january 1 , 2006 . fas 123 ( r ) requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors , including stock options . compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards ( generally the vesting period ) . the fair value of retention awards is the stock price on the date of grant , while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . we elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by fas 123 ( r ) and did not restate financial results for prior periods . we did not make an adjustment for the cumulative effect of these estimated forfeitures , as the impact was not material . as a result of the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we recognized expense for stock options in 2006 , in addition to retention awards , which were expensed prior to 2006 . stock-based compensation expense for the year ended december 31 , 2006 was $ 22 million , after tax , or $ 0.08 per basic and diluted share . this includes $ 9 million for stock options and $ 13 million for retention awards for 2006 . before taxes , stock-based compensation expense included $ 14 million for stock options and $ 21 million for retention awards for 2006 . we recorded $ 29 million of excess tax benefits as an inflow of financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . prior to the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we applied the recognition and measurement principles of accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , accounting for stock issued to employees , and related interpretations . no stock- based employee compensation expense related to stock option grants was reflected in net income , as all options granted under those plans had a grant price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . stock-based compensation expense related to retention shares , stock units , and other incentive plans was reflected in net income . the following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense year ended december 31 , millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td><td>$ 604</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td><td>$ 582</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 2.33</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td><td>$ 2.25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td><td>$ 2.30</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td><td>$ 2.22</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the .\nQuestion: what was earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma in 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.25" } ]
CONVFINQA7005	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively . leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no . 13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) . from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million . as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 53.8</td><td>$ 55.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>31.7</td><td>36.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-38.5 ( 38.5 )</td><td>-43.9 ( 43.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-43.0 ( 43.0 )</td><td>-43.3 ( 43.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 4.0</td><td>$ 3.8</td></tr></table> 9 . mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company . for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k . reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: .\nQuestion: what was the difference in income from investment in the retail store leases between 2006 and 2007?\nAnswer: -0.1\nQuestion: and the growth rate during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.07692" } ]
CONVFINQA10919	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 4036</td><td>$ 4347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>-1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>643</td><td>987</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>8</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td><td>.73% ( .73 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.84</td><td>2.17</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td><td>$ -359 ( 359 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td><td>-930 ( 930 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>$ -1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td><td>.35% ( .35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>1.07</td><td>1.24</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the value in the allowance for loan and lease losses in 2013?\nAnswer: 3609.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2012?\nAnswer: 4036.0\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\nAnswer: -427.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4036.0" } ]
CONVFINQA994	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe cannot assure you that the gener restructuring will be completed or that the terms thereof will not be changed materially . in addition , gener is in the process of restructuring the debt of its subsidiaries , termoandes s.a . ( 2018 2018termoandes 2019 2019 ) and interandes , s.a . ( 2018 2018interandes 2019 2019 ) , and expects that the maturities of these obligations will be extended . under-performing businesses during 2003 we sold or discontinued under-performing businesses and construction projects that did not meet our investment criteria or did not provide reasonable opportunities to restructure . it is anticipated that there will be less ongoing activity related to write-offs of development or construction projects and impairment charges in the future . the businesses , which were affected in 2003 , are listed below . impairment project name project type date location ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>project name</td><td>project type</td><td>date</td><td>location</td><td>impairment ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ede este ( 1 )</td><td>operating</td><td>december 2003</td><td>dominican republic</td><td>$ 60</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wolf hollow</td><td>operating</td><td>december 2003</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 120</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>granite ridge</td><td>operating</td><td>december 2003</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 201</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>colombia i</td><td>operating</td><td>november 2003</td><td>colombia</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>zeg</td><td>construction</td><td>december 2003</td><td>poland</td><td>$ 23</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>bujagali</td><td>construction</td><td>august 2003</td><td>uganda</td><td>$ 76</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>el faro</td><td>construction</td><td>april 2003</td><td>honduras</td><td>$ 20</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) see note 4 2014discontinued operations . improving credit quality our de-leveraging efforts reduced parent level debt by $ 1.2 billion in 2003 ( including the secured equity-linked loan previously issued by aes new york funding l.l.c. ) . we refinanced and paid down near-term maturities by $ 3.5 billion and enhanced our year-end liquidity to over $ 1 billion . our average debt maturity was extended from 2009 to 2012 . at the subsidiary level we continue to pursue limited recourse financing to reduce parent credit risk . these factors resulted in an overall reduced cost of capital , improved credit statistics and expanded access to credit at both aes and our subsidiaries . liquidity at the aes parent level is an important factor for the rating agencies in determining whether the company 2019s credit quality should improve . currency and political risk tend to be biggest variables to sustaining predictable cash flow . the nature of our large contractual and concession-based cash flow from these businesses serves to mitigate these variables . in 2003 , over 81% ( 81 % ) of cash distributions to the parent company were from u.s . large utilities and worldwide contract generation . on february 4 , 2004 , we called for redemption of $ 155049000 aggregate principal amount of outstanding 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 , which represents the entire outstanding principal amount of the 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 , and $ 34174000 aggregate principal amount of outstanding 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 . the 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 and the 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 were redeemed on march 8 , 2004 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date . the mandatory redemption of the 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 was being made with a portion of our 2018 2018adjusted free cash flow 2019 2019 ( as defined in the indenture pursuant to which the notes were issued ) for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2003 as required by the indenture and was made on a pro rata basis . on february 13 , 2004 we issued $ 500 million of unsecured senior notes . the unsecured senior notes mature on march 1 , 2014 and are callable at our option at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the unsecured senior notes plus a make-whole premium . the unsecured senior notes were issued at a price of 98.288% ( 98.288 % ) and pay interest semi-annually at an annual .\nQuestion: what is the sum of impairment projects in the construction of zeg and bujagali?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "99.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1497	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share . our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt . information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter</td><td>dividends paid per share 2018</td><td>dividends paid per share 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first</td><td>$ 2.00</td><td>$ 1.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second</td><td>2.00</td><td>1.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third</td><td>2.00</td><td>1.82</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth</td><td>2.20</td><td>2.00</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>year</td><td>$ 8.20</td><td>$ 7.46</td></tr></table> stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index . the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation . the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. .\nQuestion: what is the total dividends paid per share during 2018?\nAnswer: 8.2\nQuestion: what about during 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7.46" } ]
CONVFINQA6069	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 selling costs increased $ 25.0 million to $ 94.6 million in 2010 from $ 69.6 million in 2009 . this increase was primarily due to higher personnel and other costs incurred for the continued expansion of our direct to consumer distribution channel and higher selling personnel costs , including increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , selling costs increased to 8.9% ( 8.9 % ) in 2010 from 8.1% ( 8.1 % ) in 2009 primarily due to higher personnel and other costs incurred for the continued expansion of our factory house stores . 2022 product innovation and supply chain costs increased $ 25.0 million to $ 96.8 million in 2010 from $ 71.8 million in 2009 primarily due to higher personnel costs for the design and sourcing of our expanding apparel , footwear and accessories lines and higher distribution facilities operating and personnel costs as compared to the prior year to support our growth in net revenues . in addition , we incurred higher expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , product innovation and supply chain costs increased to 9.1% ( 9.1 % ) in 2010 from 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) in 2009 primarily due to the items noted above . 2022 corporate services costs increased $ 24.0 million to $ 98.6 million in 2010 from $ 74.6 million in 2009 . this increase was attributable primarily to higher corporate facility costs , information technology initiatives and corporate personnel costs , including increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , corporate services costs increased to 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) in 2010 from 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) in 2009 primarily due to the items noted above . income from operations increased $ 27.1 million , or 31.8% ( 31.8 % ) , to $ 112.4 million in 2010 from $ 85.3 million in 2009 . income from operations as a percentage of net revenues increased to 10.6% ( 10.6 % ) in 2010 from 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) in 2009 . this increase was a result of the items discussed above . interest expense , net remained unchanged at $ 2.3 million in 2010 and 2009 . other expense , net increased $ 0.7 million to $ 1.2 million in 2010 from $ 0.5 million in 2009 . the increase in 2010 was due to higher net losses on the combined foreign currency exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in the euro and canadian dollar and our derivative financial instruments as compared to 2009 . provision for income taxes increased $ 4.8 million to $ 40.4 million in 2010 from $ 35.6 million in 2009 . our effective tax rate was 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) in 2010 compared to 43.2% ( 43.2 % ) in 2009 , primarily due to tax planning strategies and federal and state tax credits reducing the effective tax rate , partially offset by a valuation allowance recorded against our foreign net operating loss carryforward . segment results of operations year ended december 31 , 2011 compared to year ended december 31 , 2010 net revenues by geographic region are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>north america</td><td>$ 1383346</td><td>$ 997816</td><td>$ 385530</td><td>38.6% ( 38.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other foreign countries</td><td>89338</td><td>66111</td><td>23227</td><td>35.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 1472684</td><td>$ 1063927</td><td>$ 408757</td><td>38.4% ( 38.4 % )</td></tr></table> net revenues in our north american operating segment increased $ 385.5 million to $ 1383.3 million in 2011 from $ 997.8 million in 2010 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations . net revenues in other foreign countries increased by $ 23.2 million to $ 89.3 million in 2011 from $ 66.1 million in 2010 primarily due to footwear shipments to our dome licensee , as well as unit sales growth to our distributors in our latin american operating segment. .\nQuestion: what is the increase in provision for income taxes?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.8" } ]
CONVFINQA3825	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , due to ineffectiveness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness , was not significant . for contracts outstanding at december 31 , 2008 , we have an obligation to purchase u.s . dollars and sell euros , japanese yen , british pounds , canadian dollars , australian dollars and korean won and purchase swiss francs and sell u.s . dollars at set maturity dates ranging from january 2009 through june 2011 . the notional amounts of outstanding forward contracts entered into with third parties to purchase u.s . dollars at december 31 , 2008 were $ 1343.0 million . the notional amounts of outstanding forward contracts entered into with third parties to purchase swiss francs at december 31 , 2008 were $ 207.5 million . the fair value of outstanding derivative instruments recorded on the balance sheet at december 31 , 2008 , together with settled derivatives where the hedged item has not yet affected earnings , was a net unrealized gain of $ 32.7 million , or $ 33.0 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other comprehensive income , of which $ 16.4 million , or $ 17.9 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to earnings over the next twelve months . we also enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with terms of one month to manage currency exposures for assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than an entity 2019s functional currency . as a result , any foreign currency remeasurement gains/losses recognized in earnings under sfas no . 52 , 201cforeign currency translation , 201d are generally offset with gains/losses on the foreign currency forward exchange contracts in the same reporting period . other comprehensive income 2013 other comprehensive income refers to revenues , expenses , gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . other comprehensive income is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , unrealized foreign currency hedge gains and losses , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions . in 2006 we adopted sfas 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans 2013 an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) . 201d this statement required recognition of the funded status of our benefit plans in the statement of financial position and recognition of certain deferred gains or losses in other comprehensive income . we recorded an unrealized loss of $ 35.4 million in other comprehensive income during 2006 related to the adoption of sfas 158 . the components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows ( in millions ) : balance at december 31 , comprehensive income ( loss ) balance at december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>other comprehensive income ( loss )</td><td>balance at december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>$ 368.8</td><td>$ -49.4 ( 49.4 )</td><td>$ 319.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency hedges</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>78.4</td><td>33.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized gain/ ( loss ) on securities</td><td>-1.9 ( 1.9 )</td><td>0.6</td><td>-1.3 ( 1.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unrecognized prior service cost and unrecognized gain/ ( loss ) in actuarial assumptions</td><td>-31.2 ( 31.2 )</td><td>-79.9 ( 79.9 )</td><td>-111.1 ( 111.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive income</td><td>$ 290.3</td><td>$ -50.3 ( 50.3 )</td><td>$ 240.0</td></tr></table> during 2008 , we reclassified an investment previously accounted for under the equity method to an available-for-sale investment as we no longer exercised significant influence over the third-party investee . the investment was marked-to- market in accordance with sfas 115 , 201caccounting for certain investments in debt and equity securities , 201d resulting in a net unrealized gain of $ 23.8 million recorded in other comprehensive income for 2008 . this unrealized gain was reclassified to the income statement when we sold this investment in 2008 for total proceeds of $ 54.9 million and a gross realized gain of $ 38.8 million included in interest and other income . the basis of these securities was determined based on the consideration paid at the time of acquisition . treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of shareholders equity . we may reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes . accounting pronouncements 2013 in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , 201cfair value measurements , 201d which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . this statement does not require any new fair value measurements , but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information . sfas no . 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years . in february 2008 , the fasb issued fasb staff position ( fsp ) no . sfas 157-2 , which delays the effective date of certain provisions of sfas no . 157 relating to non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis until fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2008 . the full adoption of sfas no . 157 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg* transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 046000000 *%%pcmsg\|46 \|00009\|yes\|no\|02/24/2009 19:24\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what was unrecognized prior service cost and unrecognized gain/ ( loss ) in actuarial assumptions at the end of 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "111.1" } ]
CONVFINQA10620	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( \"ifs\" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .\nQuestion: what was the change in revenues generated by the fis segment from 2016 to 2017?\nAnswer: 105.0\nQuestion: and what is this change as a portion of those revenues in 2016?\nAnswer: 0.0232\nQuestion: in that year of 2017, what was the amount from the gfs segment?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4138.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8572	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i item 1 entergy corporation , domestic utility companies , and system energy employment litigation ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , and system energy ) entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are defendants in numerous lawsuits that have been filed by former employees alleging that they were wrongfully terminated and/or discriminated against on the basis of age , race , sex , and/or other protected characteristics . entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are vigorously defending these suits and deny any liability to the plaintiffs . however , no assurance can be given as to the outcome of these cases , and at this time management cannot estimate the total amount of damages sought . included in the employment litigation are two cases filed in state court in claiborne county , mississippi in december 2002 . the two cases were filed by former employees of entergy operations who were based at grand gulf . entergy operations and entergy employees are named as defendants . the cases make employment-related claims , and seek in total $ 53 million in alleged actual damages and $ 168 million in punitive damages . entergy subsequently removed both proceedings to the federal district in jackson , mississippi . entergy cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this proceeding . research spending entergy is a member of the electric power research institute ( epri ) . epri conducts a broad range of research in major technical fields related to the electric utility industry . entergy participates in various epri projects based on entergy's needs and available resources . the domestic utility companies contributed $ 1.6 million in 2004 , $ 1.5 million in 2003 , and $ 2.1 million in 2002 to epri . the non-utility nuclear business contributed $ 3.2 million in 2004 and $ 3 million in both 2003 and 2002 to epri . employees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers . as of december 31 , 2004 , entergy employed 14425 people . u.s . utility: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>1494</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy gulf states</td><td>1641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>943</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>793</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>403</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>system energy</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>entergy operations</td><td>2735</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>entergy services</td><td>2704</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>entergy nuclear operations</td><td>3245</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other subsidiaries</td><td>277</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total full-time</td><td>14235</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>part-time</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total entergy</td><td>14425</td></tr></table> approximately 4900 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , and the international brotherhood of teamsters union. .\nQuestion: what percentage of full-time employees are in entergy nuclear operations?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.22796" } ]
CONVFINQA341	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnike , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) such agreements in place . however , based on the company 2019s historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss , the company has determined that the fair value of such indemnifications is not material to the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . in the ordinary course of its business , the company is involved in various legal proceedings involving contractual and employment relationships , product liability claims , trademark rights , and a variety of other matters . the company does not believe there are any pending legal proceedings that will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . note 16 2014 restructuring charges during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company took necessary steps to streamline its management structure , enhance consumer focus , drive innovation more quickly to market and establish a more scalable , long-term cost structure . as a result , the company reduced its global workforce by approximately 5% ( 5 % ) and incurred pre-tax restructuring charges of $ 195 million , primarily consisting of severance costs related to the workforce reduction . as nearly all of the restructuring activities were completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company does not expect to recognize additional costs in future periods relating to these actions . the restructuring charge is reflected in the corporate expense line in the segment presentation of pre-tax income in note 19 2014 operating segments and related information . the activity in the restructuring accrual for the year ended may 31 , 2009 is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>restructuring accrual 2014 june 1 2008</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>severance and related costs</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash payments</td><td>-29.4 ( 29.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash stock option and restricted stock expense</td><td>-19.5 ( 19.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation and other</td><td>3.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restructuring accrual 2014 may 31 2009</td><td>$ 149.6</td></tr></table> the accrual balance as of may 31 , 2009 will be relieved throughout fiscal year 2010 and early 2011 , as severance payments are completed . the restructuring accrual is included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . as part of its restructuring activities , the company reorganized its nike brand operations geographic structure . in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , nike brand operations were organized into the following four geographic regions : u.s. , europe , middle east and africa ( collectively , 201cemea 201d ) , asia pacific , and americas . in the fourth quarter of 2009 , the company initiated a reorganization of the nike brand business into a new operating model . as a result of this reorganization , beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 , the nike brand operations will consist of the following six geographies : north america , western europe , central/eastern europe , greater china , japan , and emerging markets . note 17 2014 divestitures on december 17 , 2007 , the company completed the sale of the starter brand business to iconix brand group , inc . for $ 60.0 million in cash . this transaction resulted in a gain of $ 28.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008. .\nQuestion: what was the value of the sale of the starter brand?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "60.0" } ]
CONVFINQA298	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncontingencies we are exposed to certain known contingencies that are material to our investors . the facts and circumstances surrounding these contingencies and a discussion of their effect on us are in note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report on form 10-k . these contingencies may have a material effect on our liquidity , capital resources or results of operations . in addition , even where our reserves are adequate , the incurrence of any of these liabilities may have a material effect on our liquidity and the amount of cash available to us for other purposes . we believe that we have made appropriate arrangements in respect of the future effect on us of these known contingencies . we also believe that the amount of cash available to us from our operations , together with cash from financing , will be sufficient for us to pay any known contingencies as they become due without materially affecting our ability to conduct our operations and invest in the growth of our business . off-balance sheet arrangements we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements except for operating leases entered into in the normal course of business . contractual obligations and commitments below is a summary of our future payment commitments by year under contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2018: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2019</td><td>2020 - 2021</td><td>2022 - 2023</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt including interest ( 1 )</td><td>$ 508</td><td>$ 1287</td><td>$ 3257</td><td>$ 8167</td><td>$ 13219</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating leases</td><td>167</td><td>244</td><td>159</td><td>119</td><td>689</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>data acquisition</td><td>289</td><td>467</td><td>135</td><td>4</td><td>895</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( 2 )</td><td>17</td><td>22</td><td>15</td><td>8</td><td>62</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commitments to unconsolidated affiliates ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>benefit obligations ( 4 )</td><td>25</td><td>27</td><td>29</td><td>81</td><td>162</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>uncertain income tax positions ( 5 )</td><td>17</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1023</td><td>$ 2047</td><td>$ 3595</td><td>$ 8379</td><td>$ 15044</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) interest payments on our debt are based on the interest rates in effect on december 31 , 2018 . ( 2 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased , fixed , minimum or variable pricing provisions and the approximate timing of the transactions . ( 3 ) we are currently committed to invest $ 120 million in private equity funds . as of december 31 , 2018 , we have funded approximately $ 78 million of these commitments and we have approximately $ 42 million remaining to be funded which has not been included in the above table as we are unable to predict when these commitments will be paid . ( 4 ) amounts represent expected future benefit payments for our pension and postretirement benefit plans , as well as expected contributions for 2019 for our funded pension benefit plans . we made cash contributions totaling approximately $ 31 million to our defined benefit plans in 2018 , and we estimate that we will make contributions totaling approximately $ 25 million to our defined benefit plans in 2019 . due to the potential impact of future plan investment performance , changes in interest rates , changes in other economic and demographic assumptions and changes in legislation in foreign jurisdictions , we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing and amount of contributions that may be required to fund our defined benefit plans for periods beyond 2019 . ( 5 ) as of december 31 , 2018 , our liability related to uncertain income tax positions was approximately $ 106 million , $ 89 million of which has not been included in the above table as we are unable to predict when these liabilities will be paid due to the uncertainties in the timing of the settlement of the income tax positions. .\nQuestion: what was the change in benefits obligations from 2018 to 2019, in millions?\nAnswer: -6.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of benefits obligations in 2018, also in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "31.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10653	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nprojected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 980</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1185</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>978</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1022</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1425</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013 - 2017</td><td>$ 8147</td></tr></table> ( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the value of projected payments in 2009?\nAnswer: 1185.0\nQuestion: what is the value in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "980.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3630	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 21 . expenses during the fourth quarter of 2008 , we elected to provide support to certain investment accounts managed by ssga through the purchase of asset- and mortgage-backed securities and a cash infusion , which resulted in a charge of $ 450 million . ssga manages certain investment accounts , offered to retirement plans , that allow participants to purchase and redeem units at a constant net asset value regardless of volatility in the underlying value of the assets held by the account . the accounts enter into contractual arrangements with independent third-party financial institutions that agree to make up any shortfall in the account if all the units are redeemed at the constant net asset value . the financial institutions have the right , under certain circumstances , to terminate this guarantee with respect to future investments in the account . during 2008 , the liquidity and pricing issues in the fixed-income markets adversely affected the market value of the securities in these accounts to the point that the third-party guarantors considered terminating their financial guarantees with the accounts . although we were not statutorily or contractually obligated to do so , we elected to purchase approximately $ 2.49 billion of asset- and mortgage-backed securities from these accounts that had been identified as presenting increased risk in the current market environment and to contribute an aggregate of $ 450 million to the accounts to improve the ratio of the market value of the accounts 2019 portfolio holdings to the book value of the accounts . we have no ongoing commitment or intent to provide support to these accounts . the securities are carried in investment securities available for sale in our consolidated statement of condition . the components of other expenses were as follows for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer indemnification obligation</td><td>$ 200</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities processing</td><td>187</td><td>$ 79</td><td>$ 37</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>505</td><td>399</td><td>281</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total other expenses</td><td>$ 892</td><td>$ 478</td><td>$ 318</td></tr></table> in september and october 2008 , lehman brothers holdings inc. , or lehman brothers , and certain of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings . while we had no unsecured financial exposure to lehman brothers or its affiliates , we indemnified certain customers in connection with these and other collateralized repurchase agreements with lehman brothers entities . in the then current market environment , the market value of the underlying collateral had declined . during the third quarter of 2008 , to the extent these declines resulted in collateral value falling below the indemnification obligation , we recorded a reserve to provide for our estimated net exposure . the reserve , which totaled $ 200 million , was based on the cost of satisfying the indemnification obligation net of the fair value of the collateral , which we purchased during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the collateral , composed of commercial real estate loans which are discussed in note 5 , is recorded in loans and leases in our consolidated statement of condition. .\nQuestion: what is the customer indemnification obligation in 2008?\nAnswer: 200.0\nQuestion: what about the total other expenses?\nAnswer: 892.0\nQuestion: what portion of the total is related to customer indemnification obligation?\nAnswer: 0.22422\nQuestion: what about the expenses related to securities processing in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "79.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7784	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co . 162 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2007 annual report note 25 2013 accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) includes the after-tax change in sfas 115 unrealized gains and losses on afs securities , sfas 52 foreign currency translation adjustments ( including the impact of related derivatives ) , sfas 133 cash flow hedging activities and sfas 158 net loss and prior service cost ( credit ) related to the firm 2019s defined benefit pension and opeb plans . net loss and accumulated translation prior service ( credit ) of other unrealized gains ( losses ) adjustments , cash defined benefit pension comprehensive ( in millions ) on afs securities ( a ) net of hedges flow hedges and opeb plans ( e ) income ( loss ) balance at december 31 , 2004 $ ( 61 ) $ ( 8 ) $ ( 139 ) $ 2014 $ ( 208 ) net change ( 163 ) ( b ) 2014 ( 255 ) 2014 ( 418 ) balance at december 31 , 2005 ( 224 ) ( 8 ) ( 394 ) 2014 ( 626 ) net change 253 ( c ) 13 ( 95 ) 2014 171 adjustment to initially apply sfas 158 , net of taxes 2014 2014 2014 ( 1102 ) ( 1102 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>unrealized gains ( losses ) on afs securities ( a )</td><td>translation adjustments net of hedges</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>net loss andprior service ( credit ) of defined benefit pension and opeb plans ( e )</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2004</td><td>$ -61 ( 61 )</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ -139 ( 139 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -208 ( 208 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net change</td><td>( 163 ) ( b )</td><td>2014</td><td>-255 ( 255 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-418 ( 418 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2005</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-394 ( 394 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-626 ( 626 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change</td><td>253 ( c )</td><td>13</td><td>-95 ( 95 )</td><td>2014</td><td>171</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>adjustment to initially apply sfas 158 net of taxes</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>29</td><td>5</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1557 ( 1557 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles ( sfas 159 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at january 1 2007 adjusted</td><td>28</td><td>5</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1558 ( 1558 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net change</td><td>352 ( d )</td><td>3</td><td>-313 ( 313 )</td><td>599</td><td>641</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 380</td><td>$ 8</td><td>$ -802 ( 802 )</td><td>$ -503 ( 503 )</td><td>$ -917 ( 917 )</td></tr></table> net change 352 ( d ) 3 ( 313 ) 599 641 balance at december 31 , 2007 $ 380 $ 8 $ ( 802 ) $ ( 503 ) $ ( 917 ) ( a ) represents the after-tax difference between the fair value and amortized cost of the afs securities portfolio and retained interests in securitizations recorded in other assets . ( b ) the net change during 2005 was due primarily to higher interest rates , partially offset by the reversal of unrealized losses from securities sales . ( c ) the net change during 2006 was due primarily to the reversal of unrealized losses from securities sales . ( d ) the net change during 2007 was due primarily to a decline in interest rates . ( e ) for further discussion of sfas 158 , see note 9 on pages 124 2013130 of this annual report. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in unrealized gains on afs securities between 12/31/06 and 12/31/07?\nAnswer: 351.0\nQuestion: and the specific balance as of 12/31/06?\nAnswer: 29.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12.10345" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.