Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA5194	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nlong-term product offerings include alpha-seeking active and index strategies . our alpha-seeking active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile , and leverage fundamental research and quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both alpha-seeking active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . net flows in institutional index products generally have a small impact on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2017 equity aum totaled $ 3.372 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 130.1 billion . net inflows included $ 174.4 billion into ishares etfs , driven by net inflows into core funds and broad developed and emerging market equities , partially offset by non-etf index and active net outflows of $ 25.7 billion and $ 18.5 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s equity revenues and effective fee rate . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2017 at $ 1.855 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 178.8 billion . in 2017 , active net inflows of $ 21.5 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows into municipal , unconstrained and total return bond funds . ishares etfs net inflows of $ 67.5 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and treasury bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 89.8 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2017 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312016</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fximpact</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 176675</td><td>$ -2502 ( 2502 )</td><td>$ 17387</td><td>$ 4985</td><td>$ 196545</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>149432</td><td>23925</td><td>24532</td><td>1577</td><td>199466</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>68395</td><td>-1047 ( 1047 )</td><td>7522</td><td>8819</td><td>83689</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>505</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td><td>119</td><td>2014</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 395007</td><td>$ 20330</td><td>$ 49560</td><td>$ 15381</td><td>$ 480278</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) futureadvisor amounts do not include aum held in ishares etfs . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 18.9 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 20.8 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2017 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 1.1 billion reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 5.8 billion in 2017 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 41% ( 41 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 16% ( 16 % ) organically in 2017 , with net inflows of $ 23.9 billion . institutional investors represented 93% ( 93 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 87% ( 87 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary active asset allocation overlay model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . underlying investments are primarily index products . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of investment management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .\nQuestion: what is the balance of total multi-asset aum in 2017?\nAnswer: 480278.0\nQuestion: what about in 2016?\nAnswer: 395007.0\nQuestion: what is the fraction of 2017 balance to 2016 balance?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.21587" } ]
CONVFINQA9998	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table displays the expected benefit payments in the years indicated : ( dollars in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 117</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>203</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>next 5 years</td><td>2731</td></tr></table> 1 4 . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s a n d s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n a . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s under bermuda law , group is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities and its issued share capital and share premium ( addi- tional paid-in capital ) accounts . group 2019s ability to pay dividends and its operating expenses is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries . the payment of such dividends by insurer subsidiaries is limited under bermuda law and the laws of the var- ious u.s . states in which group 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled or deemed domiciled . the limitations are generally based upon net income and compliance with applicable policyholders 2019 surplus or minimum solvency margin and liquidity ratio requirements as determined in accordance with the relevant statutory accounting practices . under bermuda law , bermuda re is prohibited from declaring or making payment of a dividend if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin or minimum liquidity ratio . as a long-term insurer , bermuda re is also unable to declare or pay a dividend to anyone who is not a policyholder unless , after payment of the dividend , the value of the assets in its long-term business fund , as certified by its approved actuary , exceeds its liabilities for long-term business by at least the $ 250000 minimum solvency margin . prior approval of the bermuda monetary authority is required if bermuda re 2019s dividend payments would reduce its prior year-end total statutory capital by 15.0% ( 15.0 % ) or more . delaware law provides that an insurance company which is a member of an insurance holding company system and is domi- ciled in the state shall not pay dividends without giving prior notice to the insurance commissioner of delaware and may not pay dividends without the approval of the insurance commissioner if the value of the proposed dividend , together with all other dividends and distributions made in the preceding twelve months , exceeds the greater of ( 1 ) 10% ( 10 % ) of statutory surplus or ( 2 ) net income , not including realized capital gains , each as reported in the prior year 2019s statutory annual statement . in addition , no dividend may be paid in excess of unassigned earned surplus . at december 31 , 2006 , everest re had $ 270.4 million available for payment of dividends in 2007 without the need for prior regulatory approval . b . s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n everest re prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the national association of insurance commissioners ( 201cnaic 201d ) and the delaware insurance department . prescribed statutory accounting practices are set forth in the naic accounting practices and procedures manual . the capital and statutory surplus of everest re was $ 2704.1 million ( unaudited ) and $ 2327.6 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of everest re was $ 298.7 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 26.9 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income $ 175.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . bermuda re prepares its statutory financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles set forth in bermuda in the insurance act 1978 , amendments thereto and related regulations . the statutory capital and surplus of bermuda re was $ 1893.9 million ( unaudited ) and $ 1522.5 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of bermuda re was $ 409.8 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 220.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income was $ 248.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . 1 5 . c o n t i n g e n c i e s in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance , reinsur- ance and other contractual agreements . in some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it . in other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights . these disputes arise from time to time and as they arise are addressed , and ultimately resolved , through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation . in all such matters , the company believes that .\nQuestion: what were the expected benefit payments in 2007 and 2008 combined?\nAnswer: 257.0\nQuestion: and the value for 2009 specifically?\nAnswer: 203.0\nQuestion: now combined with the other two years?\nAnswer: 460.0\nQuestion: and now including 2010?\nAnswer: 723.0\nQuestion: and also combined with 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1051.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4858	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries job title kimco realty ar revision 6 serial date / time tuesday , april 03 , 2007 /10:32 pm job number 142704 type current page no . 65 operator pm2 <12345678> at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the company 2019s net invest- ment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in mil- lions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 62.3</td><td>$ 68.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>40.5</td><td>43.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-48.4 ( 48.4 )</td><td>-52.8 ( 52.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-50.7 ( 50.7 )</td><td>-55.9 ( 55.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 3.7</td><td>$ 4.0</td></tr></table> 9 . mortgages and other financing receivables : during january 2006 , the company provided approximately $ 16.0 million as its share of a $ 50.0 million junior participation in a $ 700.0 million first mortgage loan , in connection with a private investment firm 2019s acquisition of a retailer . this loan participation bore interest at libor plus 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) per annum and had a two-year term with a one-year extension option and was collateralized by certain real estate interests of the retailer . during june 2006 , the borrower elected to pre-pay the outstanding loan balance of approximately $ 16.0 million in full satisfaction of this loan . additionally , during january 2006 , the company provided approximately $ 5.2 million as its share of an $ 11.5 million term loan to a real estate developer for the acquisition of a 59 acre land parcel located in san antonio , tx . this loan is interest only at a fixed rate of 11.0% ( 11.0 % ) for a term of two years payable monthly and collateralized by a first mortgage on the subject property . as of december 31 , 2006 , the outstanding balance on this loan was approximately $ 5.2 million . during february 2006 , the company committed to provide a one year $ 17.2 million credit facility at a fixed rate of 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) for a term of nine months and 9.0% ( 9.0 % ) for the remaining term to a real estate investor for the recapitalization of a discount and entertain- ment mall that it currently owns . during 2006 , this facility was fully paid and was terminated . during april 2006 , the company provided two separate mortgages aggregating $ 14.5 million on a property owned by a real estate investor . proceeds were used to payoff the existing first mortgage , buyout the existing partner and for redevelopment of the property . the mortgages bear interest at 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and mature in 2008 and 2013 . these mortgages are collateralized by the subject property . as of december 31 , 2006 , the aggregate outstanding balance on these mortgages was approximately $ 15.0 million , including $ 0.5 million of accrued interest . during may 2006 , the company provided a cad $ 23.5 million collateralized credit facility at a fixed rate of 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum for a term of two years to a real estate company for the execution of its property acquisitions program . the credit facility is guaranteed by the real estate company . the company was issued 9811 units , valued at approximately usd $ 0.1 million , and warrants to purchase up to 0.1 million shares of the real estate company as a loan origination fee . during august 2006 , the company increased the credit facility to cad $ 45.0 million and received an additional 9811 units , valued at approximately usd $ 0.1 million , and warrants to purchase up to 0.1 million shares of the real estate company . as of december 31 , 2006 , the outstand- ing balance on this credit facility was approximately cad $ 3.6 million ( approximately usd $ 3.1 million ) . during september 2005 , a newly formed joint venture , in which the company had an 80% ( 80 % ) interest , acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) interest in a $ 48.4 million mortgage receivable for a purchase price of approximately $ 34.2 million . this loan bore interest at a rate of three-month libor plus 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) per annum and was scheduled to mature on january 12 , 2010 . a 626-room hotel located in lake buena vista , fl collateralized the loan . the company had determined that this joint venture entity was a vie and had further determined that the company was the primary benefici- ary of this vie and had therefore consolidated it for financial reporting purposes . during march 2006 , the joint venture acquired the remaining 10% ( 10 % ) of this mortgage receivable for a purchase price of approximately $ 3.8 million . during june 2006 , the joint venture accepted a pre-payment of approximately $ 45.2 million from the borrower as full satisfaction of this loan . during august 2006 , the company provided $ 8.8 million as its share of a $ 13.2 million 12-month term loan to a retailer for general corporate purposes . this loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 12.50% ( 12.50 % ) with interest payable monthly and a balloon payment for the principal balance at maturity . the loan is collateralized by the underlying real estate of the retailer . additionally , the company funded $ 13.3 million as its share of a $ 20.0 million revolving debtor-in-possession facility to this retailer . the facility bears interest at libor plus 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) and has an unused line fee of 0.375% ( 0.375 % ) . this credit facility is collateralized by a first priority lien on all the retailer 2019s assets . as of december 31 , 2006 , the compa- ny 2019s share of the outstanding balance on this loan and credit facility was approximately $ 7.6 million and $ 4.9 million , respec- tively . during september 2006 , the company provided a mxp 57.3 million ( approximately usd $ 5.3 million ) loan to an owner of an operating property in mexico . the loan , which is collateralized by the property , bears interest at 12.0% ( 12.0 % ) per annum and matures in 2016 . the company is entitled to a participation feature of 25% ( 25 % ) of annual cash flows after debt service and 20% ( 20 % ) of the gain on sale of the property . as of december 31 , 2006 , the outstand- ing balance on this loan was approximately mxp 57.8 million ( approximately usd $ 5.3 million ) . during november 2006 , the company committed to provide a mxp 124.8 million ( approximately usd $ 11.5 million ) loan to an owner of a land parcel in acapulco , mexico . the loan , which is collateralized with an operating property owned by the bor- rower , bears interest at 10% ( 10 % ) per annum and matures in 2016 . the company is entitled to a participation feature of 20% ( 20 % ) of excess cash flows and gains on sale of the property . as of decem- ber 31 , 2006 , the outstanding balance on this loan was mxp 12.8 million ( approximately usd $ 1.2 million ) . .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2006, how much did the cad amount of the outstanding balance on the credit facility represent in relation to its equivalent in usd?\nAnswer: 1.16129\nQuestion: and during may of that year, what was the amount of the collateralized credit facility provided by the company, in millions of cad?\nAnswer: 23.5\nQuestion: and what was its fixed rate per annum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.085" } ]
CONVFINQA8870	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company 2019s stock performance the following graph compares cumulative total return of the company 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the nasdaq stock market-united states , and ( ii ) the nasdaq biotechnology index . the graph assumes ( a ) $ 100 was invested on july 31 , 2001 in each of the company 2019s common stock , the stocks comprising the nasdaq stock market-united states and the stocks comprising the nasdaq biotechnology index , and ( b ) the reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 65 month cumulative total return* among alexion pharmaceuticals , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq biotechnology index alexion pharmaceuticals , inc . nasdaq composite nasdaq biotechnology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>7/02</td><td>7/03</td><td>7/04</td><td>7/05</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alexion pharmaceuticals inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>108.38</td><td>102.64</td><td>167.89</td><td>130.56</td><td>260.41</td><td>483.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.98</td><td>142.51</td><td>164.85</td><td>168.24</td><td>187.43</td><td>204.78</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq biotechnology</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.29</td><td>146.51</td><td>176.75</td><td>186.10</td><td>183.89</td><td>187.04</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of the alexion pharmaceuticals inc . in march?\nAnswer: 108.38\nQuestion: and what was it in february?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "100.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9472	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n46 d e v o n e n e r g y a n n u a l r e p o r t 2 0 0 4 contents of gas produced , transportation availability and costs and demand for the various products derived from oil , natural gas and ngls . substantially all of devon 2019s revenues are attributable to sales , processing and transportation of these three commodities . consequently , our financial results and resources are highly influenced by price volatility . estimates for devon 2019s future production of oil , natural gas and ngls are based on the assumption that market demand and prices will continue at levels that allow for profitable production of these products . there can be no assurance of such stability . most of our canadian production is subject to government royalties that fluctuate with prices . thus , price fluctuations can affect reported production . also , our international production is governed by payout agreements with the governments of the countries in which we operate . if the payout under these agreements is attained earlier than projected , devon 2019s net production and proved reserves in such areas could be reduced . estimates for our future processing and transport of oil , natural gas and ngls are based on the assumption that market demand and prices will continue at levels that allow for profitable processing and transport of these products . there can be no assurance of such stability . the production , transportation , processing and marketing of oil , natural gas and ngls are complex processes which are subject to disruption from many causes . these causes include transportation and processing availability , mechanical failure , human error , meteorological events including , but not limited to , hurricanes , and numerous other factors . the following forward-looking statements were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for devon 2019s oil , natural gas and ngls during 2005 will be substantially similar to those of 2004 , unless otherwise noted . unless otherwise noted , all of the following dollar amounts are expressed in u.s . dollars . amounts related to canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using a projected average 2005 exchange rate of $ 0.82 u.s . to $ 1.00 canadian . the actual 2005 exchange rate may vary materially from this estimate . such variations could have a material effect on the following estimates . though we have completed several major property acquisitions and dispositions in recent years , these transactions are opportunity driven . thus , the following forward-looking data excludes the financial and operating effects of potential property acquisitions or divestitures , except as discussed in 201cproperty acquisitions and divestitures , 201d during the year 2005 . the timing and ultimate results of such acquisition and divestiture activity is difficult to predict , and may vary materially from that discussed in this report . geographic reporting areas for 2005 the following estimates of production , average price differentials and capital expenditures are provided separately for each of the following geographic areas : 2022 the united states onshore ; 2022 the united states offshore , which encompasses all oil and gas properties in the gulf of mexico ; 2022 canada ; and 2022 international , which encompasses all oil and gas properties that lie outside of the united states and canada . year 2005 potential operating items the estimates related to oil , gas and ngl production , operating costs and dd&a set forth in the following paragraphs are based on estimates for devon 2019s properties other than those that have been designated for possible sale ( see 201cproperty acquisitions and divestitures 201d ) . therefore , the following estimates exclude the results of the potential sale properties for the entire year . oil , gas and ngl production set forth in the following paragraphs are individual estimates of devon 2019s oil , gas and ngl production for 2005 . on a combined basis , devon estimates its 2005 oil , gas and ngl production will total 217 mmboe . of this total , approximately 92% ( 92 % ) is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31 , 2004 . oil production we expect our oil production in 2005 to total 60 mmbbls . of this total , approximately 95% ( 95 % ) is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31 , 2004 . the expected production by area is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( mmbbls )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states onshore</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>united states offshore</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>canada</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>international</td><td>26</td></tr></table> oil prices 2013 fixed through various price swaps , devon has fixed the price it will receive in 2005 on a portion of its oil production . the following table includes information on this fixed-price production by area . where necessary , the prices have been adjusted for certain transportation costs that are netted against the prices recorded by devon. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2005, what would have been the equivalent, in us dollars, of 20 canadian dollars?\nAnswer: 16.4\nQuestion: and in that same year, what percentage of the expected oil production was not estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31, 2004?\nAnswer: 1.05263\nQuestion: what is this percentage numerically, or as a portion of one?\nAnswer: 0.01053\nQuestion: and what was the amount of that oil production, in mmbbls?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "60.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3851	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\na summary of the company 2019s significant contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2015 , follows : contractual obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>total</td><td>payments due by year 2016</td><td>payments due by year 2017</td><td>payments due by year 2018</td><td>payments due by year 2019</td><td>payments due by year 2020</td><td>payments due by year after 2020</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt including current portion ( note 10 )</td><td>$ 9878</td><td>$ 1125</td><td>$ 744</td><td>$ 993</td><td>$ 622</td><td>$ 1203</td><td>$ 5191</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest on long-term debt</td><td>2244</td><td>174</td><td>157</td><td>153</td><td>149</td><td>146</td><td>1465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases ( note 14 )</td><td>943</td><td>234</td><td>191</td><td>134</td><td>86</td><td>72</td><td>226</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capital leases ( note 14 )</td><td>59</td><td>11</td><td>6</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unconditional purchase obligations and other</td><td>1631</td><td>1228</td><td>160</td><td>102</td><td>54</td><td>56</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total contractual cash obligations</td><td>$ 14755</td><td>$ 2772</td><td>$ 1258</td><td>$ 1386</td><td>$ 914</td><td>$ 1480</td><td>$ 6945</td></tr></table> long-term debt payments due in 2016 and 2017 include floating rate notes totaling $ 126 million ( classified as current portion of long-term debt ) , and $ 96 million ( included as a separate floating rate note in the long-term debt table ) , respectively , as a result of put provisions associated with these debt instruments . interest projections on both floating and fixed rate long-term debt , including the effects of interest rate swaps , are based on effective interest rates as of december 31 , 2015 . unconditional purchase obligations are defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding on the company . included in the unconditional purchase obligations category above are certain obligations related to take or pay contracts , capital commitments , service agreements and utilities . these estimates include both unconditional purchase obligations with terms in excess of one year and normal ongoing purchase obligations with terms of less than one year . many of these commitments relate to take or pay contracts , in which 3m guarantees payment to ensure availability of products or services that are sold to customers . the company expects to receive consideration ( products or services ) for these unconditional purchase obligations . contractual capital commitments are included in the preceding table , but these commitments represent a small part of the company 2019s expected capital spending in 2016 and beyond . the purchase obligation amounts do not represent the entire anticipated purchases in the future , but represent only those items for which the company is contractually obligated . the majority of 3m 2019s products and services are purchased as needed , with no unconditional commitment . for this reason , these amounts will not provide a reliable indicator of the company 2019s expected future cash outflows on a stand-alone basis . other obligations , included in the preceding table within the caption entitled 201cunconditional purchase obligations and other , 201d include the current portion of the liability for uncertain tax positions under asc 740 , which is expected to be paid out in cash in the next 12 months . the company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the long-term payments or the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time ; therefore , the long-term portion of the net tax liability of $ 208 million is excluded from the preceding table . refer to note 8 for further details . as discussed in note 11 , the company does not have a required minimum cash pension contribution obligation for its u.s . plans in 2016 and company contributions to its u.s . and international pension plans are expected to be largely discretionary in future years ; therefore , amounts related to these plans are not included in the preceding table . financial instruments the company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts , options and swaps to hedge against the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash flows denominated in foreign currencies and certain intercompany financing transactions . the company manages interest rate risks using a mix of fixed and floating rate debt . to help manage borrowing costs , the company may enter into interest rate swaps . under these arrangements , the company agrees to exchange , at specified intervals , the difference between fixed and floating interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount . the company manages commodity price risks through negotiated supply contracts , price protection agreements and forward contracts. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2015, what percentage did the total interest on long-term debt represent in relation to the total contractual cash obligations?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.15208" } ]
CONVFINQA9527	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-12.0 ( 12.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-7.4 ( 7.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 959.2</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to \"hurricane rita and hurricane katrina\" and \"state and local rate regulation\" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see \"state and local rate regulation\" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .\nQuestion: what was net revenue in 2008?\nAnswer: 959.2\nQuestion: what was it in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "991.1" } ]
CONVFINQA5634	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , \"would expect\" , \"would not expect\" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , \"provisional\" , \"plan\" , \"believe\" , \"probable\" , \"reasonably possible\" , \"may\" , \"could\" , \"should\" , \"intends\" , \"foreseeable future\" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . from 2012 to 2017?\nAnswer: 76.08\nQuestion: and what was that change for standard and poor's 500 index during the same period?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "108.14" } ]
CONVFINQA5754	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nlocal consumer lending local consumer lending ( lcl ) , which constituted approximately 70% ( 70 % ) of citi holdings by assets as of december 31 , 2010 , includes a portion of citigroup 2019s north american mortgage business , retail partner cards , western european cards and retail banking , citifinancial north america and other local consumer finance businesses globally . the student loan corporation is reported as discontinued operations within the corporate/other segment for the second half of 2010 only . at december 31 , 2010 , lcl had $ 252 billion of assets ( $ 226 billion in north america ) . approximately $ 129 billion of assets in lcl as of december 31 , 2010 consisted of u.s . mortgages in the company 2019s citimortgage and citifinancial operations . the north american assets consist of residential mortgage loans ( first and second mortgages ) , retail partner card loans , personal loans , commercial real estate ( cre ) , and other consumer loans and assets . in millions of dollars 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 vs . 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 vs . 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ 13831</td><td>$ 12995</td><td>$ 17136</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>( 24 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>1995</td><td>4770</td><td>6362</td><td>-58 ( 58 )</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ 15826</td><td>$ 17765</td><td>$ 23498</td><td>( 11 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 24 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 8064</td><td>$ 9799</td><td>$ 14238</td><td>( 18 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 31 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net credit losses</td><td>$ 17040</td><td>$ 19185</td><td>$ 13111</td><td>( 11 ) % ( % )</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>credit reserve build ( release )</td><td>-1771 ( 1771 )</td><td>5799</td><td>8573</td><td>nm</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>provision for benefits and claims</td><td>775</td><td>1054</td><td>1192</td><td>-26 ( 26 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>provision for unfunded lending commitments</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>$ 16044</td><td>$ 26038</td><td>$ 22876</td><td>( 38 ) % ( % )</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ -8282 ( 8282 )</td><td>$ -18072 ( 18072 )</td><td>$ -13616 ( 13616 )</td><td>54% ( 54 % )</td><td>( 33 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>benefits for income taxes</td><td>-3289 ( 3289 )</td><td>-7656 ( 7656 )</td><td>-5259 ( 5259 )</td><td>57</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ -4993 ( 4993 )</td><td>$ -10416 ( 10416 )</td><td>$ -8357 ( 8357 )</td><td>52% ( 52 % )</td><td>( 25 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>net income attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>8</td><td>33</td><td>12</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>net ( loss )</td><td>$ -5001 ( 5001 )</td><td>$ -10449 ( 10449 )</td><td>$ -8369 ( 8369 )</td><td>52% ( 52 % )</td><td>( 25 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>average assets ( in billions of dollars )</td><td>$ 324</td><td>$ 351</td><td>$ 420</td><td>( 8 ) % ( % )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>net credit losses as a percentage of average loans</td><td>6.20% ( 6.20 % )</td><td>6.38% ( 6.38 % )</td><td>3.80% ( 3.80 % )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></table> nm not meaningful 2010 vs . 2009 revenues , net of interest expense decreased 11% ( 11 % ) from the prior year . net interest revenue increased 6% ( 6 % ) due to the adoption of sfas 166/167 , partially offset by the impact of lower balances due to portfolio run-off and asset sales . non-interest revenue declined 58% ( 58 % ) , primarily due to the absence of the $ 1.1 billion gain on the sale of redecard in the first quarter of 2009 and a higher mortgage repurchase reserve charge . operating expenses decreased 18% ( 18 % ) , primarily due to the impact of divestitures , lower volumes , re-engineering actions and the absence of costs associated with the u.s . government loss-sharing agreement , which was exited in the fourth quarter of 2009 . provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 38% ( 38 % ) , reflecting a net $ 1.8 billion credit reserve release in 2010 compared to a $ 5.8 billion build in 2009 . lower net credit losses across most businesses were partially offset by the impact of the adoption of sfas 166/167 . on a comparable basis , net credit losses were lower year-over-year , driven by improvement in u.s . mortgages , international portfolios and retail partner cards . assets declined 21% ( 21 % ) from the prior year , primarily driven by portfolio run-off , higher loan loss reserve balances , and the impact of asset sales and divestitures , partially offset by an increase of $ 41 billion resulting from the adoption of sfas 166/167 . key divestitures in 2010 included the student loan corporation , primerica , auto loans , the canadian mastercard business and u.s . retail sales finance portfolios . 2009 vs . 2008 revenues , net of interest expense decreased 24% ( 24 % ) from the prior year . net interest revenue was 24% ( 24 % ) lower than the prior year , primarily due to lower balances , de-risking of the portfolio , and spread compression . non-interest revenue decreased $ 1.6 billion , mostly driven by the impact of higher credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts , partially offset by the $ 1.1 billion gain on the sale of redecard in the first quarter of 2009 . operating expenses declined 31% ( 31 % ) from the prior year , due to lower volumes and reductions from expense re-engineering actions , and the impact of goodwill write-offs of $ 3.0 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008 , partially offset by higher costs associated with delinquent loans . provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased 14% ( 14 % ) from the prior year , reflecting an increase in net credit losses of $ 6.1 billion , partially offset by lower reserve builds of $ 2.8 billion . higher net credit losses were primarily driven by higher losses of $ 3.6 billion in residential real estate lending , $ 1.0 billion in retail partner cards , and $ 0.7 billion in international . assets decreased $ 57 billion from the prior year , primarily driven by lower originations , wind-down of specific businesses , asset sales , divestitures , write- offs and higher loan loss reserve balances . key divestitures in 2009 included the fi credit card business , italy consumer finance , diners europe , portugal cards , norway consumer and diners club north america. .\nQuestion: in 2009, what percentage of the total revenues net of interest expense was due to net interest revenues?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.73149" } ]
CONVFINQA2545	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nreach in the united states , adding a 1400-person direct sales force , over 300000 merchants and $ 130 billion in annual payments volume . goodwill of $ 3.2 billion arising from the merger , included in the north america segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities , potential synergies from combining our existing businesses and an assembled workforce , and is not deductible for income tax purposes . due to the timing of our merger with heartland , we are still in the process of assigning goodwill to our reporting units . during the year ended may 31 , 2016 , we incurred transaction costs in connection with the merger of $ 24.4 million , which are recorded in selling , general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income . the following reflects the preliminary estimated fair values of the identified intangible assets ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>$ 977400</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>457000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademarks and trade names</td><td>176000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>covenants-not-to-compete</td><td>28640</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total estimated acquired intangible assets</td><td>$ 1639040</td></tr></table> the preliminary estimated fair value of customer-related intangible assets was determined using the income approach , which is based on projected cash flows discounted to their present value using discount rates that consider the timing and risk of the forecasted cash flows . the discount rate used is the average estimated value of a market participant 2019s cost of capital and debt , derived using customary market metrics . other significant assumptions include terminal value margin rates , future capital expenditures and future working capital requirements . acquired technology was valued using the replacement cost method , which required us to estimate the cost to construct an asset of equivalent utility at prices available at the time of the valuation analysis , with adjustments in value for physical deterioration and functional and economic obsolescence . trademarks and trade names were valued using the relief-from-royalty approach . this method assumes that trade marks and trade names have value to the extent that their owner is relieved of the obligation to pay royalties for the benefits received from them . this method required us to estimate the future revenue for the related brands , the appropriate royalty rate and the weighted-average cost of capital . the discount rate used is the average estimated value of a market participant 2019s cost of capital and debt , derived using customary market metrics . the weighted-average estimated amortization period for the total estimated acquired intangible assets is approximately 11 years . the customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period range of 7-20 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 5 years . the trademarks and trade names have an estimated amortization period of 7 years . covenants-not-to-compete have an estimated amortization period range of 1-4 years . heartland 2019s revenues and operating income represented approximately 4% ( 4 % ) and less than 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) of our total consolidated revenues and operating income , respectively , for the year ended may 31 , 2016 . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of our operations for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and may 31 , 2015 as if our merger with heartland had occurred on june 1 , 2014 . the unaudited pro forma information reflects the effects of applying our accounting policies and certain pro forma adjustments to the combined historical financial information of global payments and heartland . the pro forma adjustments include incremental amortization and depreciation expense , incremental interest expense associated with new long-term debt , a reduction of revenues and operating expenses associated with fair value adjustments made in applying the acquisition-method of accounting and the elimination of nonrecurring transaction costs directly related to the merger . global payments inc . \| 2016 form 10-k annual report 2013 67 .\nQuestion: what was the amount of the amortization of the trademarks and trade names segment?\nAnswer: 176000.0\nQuestion: considering the period of that amortization, what was the average yearly amortization expense?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "25142.85714" } ]
CONVFINQA4358	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 7426</td><td>$ 7834</td><td>$ 7789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1506</td><td>1648</td><td>1540</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>21.0% ( 21.0 % )</td><td>19.8% ( 19.8 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .\nQuestion: what is the net income in 2015, in billions?\nAnswer: 1.4\nQuestion: what about in millions?\nAnswer: 1400.0\nQuestion: what is the total revenue in 2015, in millions?\nAnswer: 7426.0\nQuestion: what profit margin does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.18853" } ]
CONVFINQA11010	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.75</td><td>$ 140.39</td><td>$ 145.84</td><td>$ 151.44</td><td>$ 221.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.45</td><td>$ 145.49</td><td>$ 148.55</td><td>$ 172.30</td><td>$ 228.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 118.59</td><td>$ 150.30</td><td>$ 150.31</td><td>$ 161.56</td><td>$ 228.42</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of united parcel service inc . in the year of 2013?\nAnswer: 221.91\nQuestion: and what is the difference between that value and the original investment made in 2008?\nAnswer: 121.91\nQuestion: how much does that difference represent, in percentage, in relation to the original investment?\nAnswer: 1.2191\nQuestion: what is the difference between the value of dow jones transportation average in 2013 and 2008?\nAnswer: 128.42\nQuestion: and how much does that difference represent, percentually, in relation to the 2008 value?\nAnswer: 1.2842\nQuestion: what is the difference, then, between the percentage difference of united parcel inc. and the one of dow jones transportation average?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.0651" } ]
CONVFINQA1052	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nworldwide wholesale distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location in which products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of april 2 , 2016: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>number of doors</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>the americas ( a )</td><td>7741</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>europe ( b )</td><td>5625</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asia ( c )</td><td>136</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>13502</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes the u.s. , canada , and latin america . ( b ) includes the middle east . ( c ) includes australia and new zealand . we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume . during fiscal 2016 , sales to our largest wholesale customer , macy's , inc . ( \"macy's\" ) , accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) and 25% ( 25 % ) of our total net revenues and total wholesale net revenues , respectively . further , during fiscal 2016 , sales to our three largest wholesale customers , including macy's , accounted for approximately 24% ( 24 % ) and 53% ( 53 % ) of our total net revenues and total wholesale net revenues , respectively . our products are sold primarily by our own sales forces . our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city . in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , stockholm , and panama . shop-within-shops . as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores , and to differentiate the presentation of our products . as of april 2 , 2016 , we had approximately 25000 shop-within-shops in our primary channels of distribution dedicated to our wholesale products worldwide . the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 100 to 9200 square feet . shop-within-shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases and components , decorative items , and flooring . we normally share in the cost of building out these shop-within-shops with our wholesale customers . basic stock replenishment program . basic products such as knit shirts , chino pants , oxford cloth shirts , select accessories , and home products can be ordered by our wholesale customers at any time through our basic stock replenishment program . we generally ship these products within two to five days of order receipt . our retail segment our retail segment sells directly to customers throughout the world via our 493 retail stores , totaling approximately 3.8 million square feet , and 583 concession-based shop-within-shops , as well as through our various e-commerce sites . the extension of our direct-to-consumer reach is one of our primary long-term strategic goals . we operate our retail business using an omni-channel retailing strategy that seeks to deliver an integrated shopping experience with a consistent message of our brands and products to our customers , regardless of whether they are shopping for our products in one of our physical stores or online . ralph lauren stores our ralph lauren stores feature a broad range of apparel , accessories , watch and jewelry , fragrance , and home product assortments in an atmosphere reflecting the distinctive attitude and image of the ralph lauren , polo , double rl , and denim & supply brands , including exclusive merchandise that is not sold in department stores . during fiscal 2016 , we opened 22 new ralph lauren stores and closed 21 stores . our ralph lauren stores are primarily situated in major upscale street locations and upscale regional malls , generally in large urban markets. .\nQuestion: as of april 2, 2016, what percentage of the total of doors in the wholesale segment were in europe?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.4166" } ]
CONVFINQA2306	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nf0b7 financial expectations 2013 we are cautious about the economic environment , but , assuming that industrial production grows approximately 3% ( 3 % ) as projected , volume should exceed 2013 levels . even with no volume growth , we expect earnings to exceed 2013 earnings , generated by core pricing gains , on-going network improvements and productivity initiatives . we expect that free cash flow for 2014 will be lower than 2013 as higher cash from operations will be more than offset by additional cash of approximately $ 400 million that will be used to pay income taxes that were previously deferred through bonus depreciation , increased capital spend and higher dividend payments . results of operations operating revenues millions 2013 2012 2011 % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>% ( % ) change 2013 v 2012</td><td>% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 20684</td><td>$ 19686</td><td>$ 18508</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>1279</td><td>1240</td><td>1049</td><td>3</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 21963</td><td>$ 20926</td><td>$ 19557</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td><td>7% ( 7 % )</td></tr></table> we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and arc . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 . revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 . arc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement . volume was essentially flat year over year as growth in automotives , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments . freight revenues from four of our six commodity groups increased during 2012 compared to 2011 . revenues from coal and agricultural products declined during the year . our franchise diversity allowed us to take advantage of growth from shale-related markets ( crude oil , frac sand and pipe ) and strong automotive manufacturing , which offset volume declines from coal and agricultural products . arc increased 7% ( 7 % ) , driven by core pricing gains and higher fuel cost recoveries . improved fuel recovery provisions and higher fuel prices , including the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) , combined to increase revenues from fuel surcharges . our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.6 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.2 billion in 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively . fuel surcharge in 2013 was essentially flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) . rising fuel prices and more shipments subject to fuel surcharges drove the increase from 2011 to 2012 . in 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services . in 2012 , other revenues increased from 2011 due primarily to higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services . assessorial revenues also increased in 2012 due to container revenue related to an increase in intermodal shipments. .\nQuestion: what was the value of the fuel surcharge revenue in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.6" } ]
CONVFINQA9575	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2011 compared to 2010 mfc 2019s net sales for 2011 increased $ 533 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase was attributable to higher volume of about $ 420 million on air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) ; and about $ 245 million from fire control systems programs primarily related to the sof clss program , which began late in the third quarter of 2010 . partially offsetting these increases were lower net sales due to decreased volume of approximately $ 75 million primarily from various services programs and approximately $ 20 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily mlrs and jassm ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2011 increased $ 96 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of about $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) as a result of increased volume and retirement of risks ; and approximately $ 25 million for various services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 35 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to increased orders on air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad ) . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales for 2013 will be comparable with 2012 . we expect low double digit percentage growth in air and missile defense programs , offset by an expected decline in volume on logistics services programs . operating profit and margin are expected to be comparable with 2012 results . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides surface ship and submarine combat systems ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; unmanned technologies and platforms ; ship systems integration ; and military and commercial training systems . mst 2019s major programs include aegis , mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) , tpq-53 radar system , mh-60 , lcs , and ptds . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7579</td><td>$ 7132</td><td>$ 7443</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>737</td><td>645</td><td>713</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>10700</td><td>10500</td><td>10600</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mst 2019s net sales for 2012 increased $ 447 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase in net sales for 2012 was attributable to higher volume and risk retirements of approximately $ 395 million from ship and aviation system programs ( primarily ptds ; lcs ; vls ; and mh-60 ) ; about $ 115 million for training and logistics solutions programs primarily due to net sales from sim industries , which was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and approximately $ 30 million as a result of increased volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 70 million from undersea systems programs due to lower volume on an international combat system program and towed array systems ; and about $ 25 million due to lower volume on various other programs . mst 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 92 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 175 million from ship and aviation system programs , which reflects higher volume and risk retirements on certain programs ( primarily vls ; ptds ; mh-60 ; and lcs ) and reserves of about $ 55 million for contract cost matters on ship and aviation system programs recorded in the fourth quarter of 2011 ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) . partially offsetting the increase was lower operating profit of approximately $ 40 million from undersea systems programs due to reduced profit booking rates on certain programs and lower volume on an international combat system program and towed array systems ; and about $ 40 million due to lower volume on various other programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 150 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .\nQuestion: what was the operating profit for mst in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "645.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10655	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nprojected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 980</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1185</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>978</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1022</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1425</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013 - 2017</td><td>$ 8147</td></tr></table> ( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the value of projected payments in 2009?\nAnswer: 1185.0\nQuestion: what is the value in 2008?\nAnswer: 980.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\nAnswer: 205.0\nQuestion: what was the 2008 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "980.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6265	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 7426</td><td>$ 7834</td><td>$ 7789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1506</td><td>1648</td><td>1540</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>21.0% ( 21.0 % )</td><td>19.8% ( 19.8 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .\nQuestion: what was the sum of working capital in 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: 1695.0\nQuestion: what was the average value over those 2 years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "847.5" } ]
CONVFINQA1168	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwhen the likelihood of clawback is considered mathematically improbable . the company records a deferred carried interest liability to the extent it receives cash or capital allocations related to carried interest prior to meeting the revenue recognition criteria . at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company had $ 219 million and $ 152 million , respectively , of deferred carried interest recorded in other liabilities/other liabilities of consolidated vies on the consolidated statements of financial condition . a portion of the deferred carried interest liability will be paid to certain employees . the ultimate timing of the recognition of performance fee revenue , if any , for these products is unknown . the following table presents changes in the deferred carried interest liability ( including the portion related to consolidated vies ) for 2017 and 2016: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 152</td><td>$ 143</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in unrealized allocations</td><td>75</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>performance fee revenue recognized</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-28 ( 28 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquisition</td><td>13</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 152</td></tr></table> for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , performance fee revenue ( which included recognized carried interest ) totaled $ 594 million , $ 295 million and $ 621 million , respectively . fees earned for technology and risk management revenue are recorded as services are performed and are generally determined using the value of positions on the aladdin platform or on a fixed-rate basis . for 2017 , 2016 and 2016 , technology and risk management revenue totaled $ 677 million , $ 595 million and $ 528 million , respectively . adjustments to revenue arising from initial estimates recorded historically have been immaterial since the majority of blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration revenue is calculated based on aum and since the company does not record performance fee revenue until performance thresholds have been exceeded and the likelihood of clawback is mathematically improbable . accounting developments recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted . revenue from contracts with customers . in may 2014 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued accounting standards update ( 201casu 201d ) 2014-09 , revenue from contracts with customers ( 201casu 2014-09 201d ) . asu 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance , including industry-specific guidance . the guidance also changes the accounting for certain contract costs and revises the criteria for determining if an entity is acting as a principal or agent in certain arrangements . the key changes in the standard that impact the company 2019s revenue recognition relate to the presentation of certain revenue contracts and associated contract costs . the most significant of these changes relates to the presentation of certain distribution costs , which are currently presented net against revenues ( contra-revenue ) and will be presented as an expense on a gross basis . the company adopted asu 2014-09 effective january 1 , 2018 on a full retrospective basis , which will require 2016 and 2017 to be restated in future filings . the cumulative effect adjustment to the 2016 opening retained earnings was not material . the company currently expects the net gross up to revenue to be approximately $ 1 billion with a corresponding gross up to expense for both 2016 and 2017 . consequently , the company expects its gaap operating margin to decline upon adoption due to the gross up of revenue . however , no material impact is expected on the company 2019s as adjusted operating margin . for accounting pronouncements that the company adopted during the year ended december 31 , 2017 and for additional recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted , see note 2 , significant accounting policies , in the consolidated financial statements contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk aum market price risk . blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration fees are primarily comprised of fees based on a percentage of the value of aum and , in some cases , performance fees expressed as a percentage of the returns realized on aum . at december 31 , 2017 , the majority of the company 2019s investment advisory and administration fees were based on average or period end aum of the applicable investment funds or separate accounts . movements in equity market prices , interest rates/credit spreads , foreign exchange rates or all three could cause the value of aum to decline , which would result in lower investment advisory and administration fees . corporate investments portfolio risks . as a leading investment management firm , blackrock devotes significant resources across all of its operations to identifying , measuring , monitoring , managing and analyzing market and operating risks , including the management and oversight of its own investment portfolio . the board of directors of the company has adopted guidelines for the review of investments to be made by the company , requiring , among other things , that investments be reviewed by certain senior officers of the company , and that certain investments may be referred to the audit committee or the board of directors , depending on the circumstances , for approval . in the normal course of its business , blackrock is exposed to equity market price risk , interest rate/credit spread risk and foreign exchange rate risk associated with its corporate investments . blackrock has investments primarily in sponsored investment products that invest in a variety of asset classes , including real assets , private equity and hedge funds . investments generally are made for co-investment purposes , to establish a performance track record , to hedge exposure to certain deferred compensation plans or for regulatory purposes . currently , the company has a seed capital hedging program in which it enters into swaps to hedge market and interest rate exposure to certain investments . at december 31 , 2017 , the company had outstanding total return swaps with an aggregate notional value of approximately $ 587 million . at december 31 , 2017 , there were no outstanding interest rate swaps. .\nQuestion: what is the revenue related technology and risk management in 2016?\nAnswer: 595.0\nQuestion: what was the revenues in 2015?\nAnswer: 528.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "67.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4577	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 130.29</td><td>$ 135.35</td><td>$ 140.54</td><td>$ 205.95</td><td>$ 223.79</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.06</td><td>$ 117.48</td><td>$ 136.26</td><td>$ 180.38</td><td>$ 205.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.74</td><td>$ 126.75</td><td>$ 136.24</td><td>$ 192.61</td><td>$ 240.91</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of the united parcel service inc . in 2014?\nAnswer: 223.79\nQuestion: and what was the change in its value from 2009 to 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "123.79" } ]
CONVFINQA10723	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the allocation of the purchase price was finalized during the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>final purchase price allocation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-current assets</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>3590</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>intangible assets ( 1 )</td><td>1062</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other non-current liabilities</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value of net assets acquired</td><td>$ 4563</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>goodwill ( 2 )</td><td>89</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 0.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 0.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . colombia 2014colombia movil acquisition 2014on july 17 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with colombia movil s.a . e.s.p . ( 201ccolombia movil 201d ) , whereby atc sitios infraco , s.a.s. , a colombian subsidiary of the company ( 201catc infraco 201d ) , would purchase up to 2126 communications sites from colombia movil for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 182.0 million . from december 21 , 2011 through the year ended december 31 , 2012 , atc infraco completed the purchase of 1526 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 136.2 million ( including contingent consideration of $ 17.3 million ) , subject to post-closing adjustments . through a subsidiary , millicom international cellular s.a . ( 201cmillicom 201d ) exercised its option to acquire an indirect , substantial non-controlling interest in atc infraco . under the terms of the agreement , the company is required to make additional payments upon the conversion of certain barter agreements with other wireless carriers to cash paying lease agreements . based on the company 2019s current estimates , the value of potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under the amended agreement is expected to be between zero and $ 32.8 million and is estimated to be $ 17.3 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes at december 31 , 2012 . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded a reduction in fair value of $ 1.2 million , which is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. .\nQuestion: on july 17, 2011, what was the aggregate purchase price of the communications sites acquired from colombia movil?\nAnswer: 182.0\nQuestion: and what was the number of those sites?\nAnswer: 2126.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the average purchase price per site?\nAnswer: 0.08561\nQuestion: and in the next year, concerning the total fair value of the net assets acquired, what percentage did the hard assets represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.78676" } ]
CONVFINQA4148	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) basis step-up from corporate restructuring represents the tax effects of increasing the basis for tax purposes of certain of the company 2019s assets in conjunction with its spin-off from american radio systems corporation , its former parent company . at december 31 , 2006 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $ 2.1 billion and $ 2.5 billion , respectively . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>federal</td><td>state</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 to 2011</td><td>-</td><td>$ 438967</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012 to 2016</td><td>-</td><td>478502</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017 to 2021</td><td>$ 617039</td><td>1001789</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022 to 2026</td><td>1476644</td><td>629354</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2093683</td><td>$ 2548612</td></tr></table> sfas no . 109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2006 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 308.2 million , including approximately $ 153.6 million attributable to spectrasite , primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards assumed as of the acquisition date . the balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred tax assets . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . valuation allowances may be reversed if related deferred tax assets are deemed realizable based on changes in facts and circumstances relevant to the assets 2019 recoverability . approximately $ 148.3 million of the spectrasite valuation allowances as of december 31 , 2006 will be recorded as a reduction to goodwill if the underlying deferred tax assets are utilized . the company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses . in june 2003 and october 2003 , the company filed federal income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $ 380.0 million of net operating losses generated prior to 2003 , of which the company initially anticipated receiving approximately $ 90.0 million . based on preliminary discussions with tax authorities , the company revised its estimate of the net realizable value of the federal income tax refund claims during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , and anticipates receiving a refund of approximately $ 65.0 million , plus interest . the company expects settlement of this matter in the first half of 2007 , however , there can be no assurances with respect to the timing of any refund . because of the uncertainty associated with the claim , the company has not recognized any amounts related to interest . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2006 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $ 1.4 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2007 to december 31 , 2026 . if the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future , or carry back losses , as described above , it .\nQuestion: on 12/31/06, what percentage of the total company nol was set to expire between 2017 and 2021?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.29471" } ]
CONVFINQA4369	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n57management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations facility include covenants relating to net interest coverage and total debt-to-book capitalization ratios . the company was in compliance with the terms of the 3-year credit facility at december 31 , 2005 . the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities . utilization of the non-u.s . credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested . contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2005 . payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2006</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 4033</td><td>$ 119</td><td>$ 1222</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 529</td><td>$ 1961</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>1150</td><td>438</td><td>190</td><td>134</td><td>109</td><td>84</td><td>195</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>992</td><td>418</td><td>28</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>539</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 975</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 337</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 615</td><td>$ 2695</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments . debt obligations : at december 31 , 2005 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.0 billion , as compared to $ 5.0 billion at december 31 , 2004 . a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , \"\"debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements . as previously discussed , the decrease in the long- term debt obligations as compared to december 31 , 2004 , was due to the redemptions and repurchases of $ 1.0 billion principal amount of outstanding securities during 2005 . also , as previously discussed , the remaining $ 118 million of 7.6% ( 7.6 % ) notes due january 1 , 2007 were reclassified to current maturities of long-term debt . lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases . at december 31 , 2005 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 1.2 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 254 million in 2005 , $ 217 million in 2004 and $ 223 million in 2003 . purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable . the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 . total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 992 million . commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers . most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) . however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) . if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders . the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than \"\"cause.'' in 2003 , the company entered into outsourcing contracts for certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology related services . these contracts generally extend for 10 years and are expected to expire in 2013 . the total payments under these contracts are approximately $ 3 billion over 10 years ; however , these contracts can be terminated . termination would result in a penalty substantially less than the annual contract payments . the company would also be required to find another source for these services , including the possibility of performing them in-house . as is customary in bidding for and completing network infrastructure projects and pursuant to a practice the company has followed for many years , the company has a number of performance/bid bonds and standby letters of credit outstanding , primarily relating to projects of government and enterprise mobility solutions segment and the networks segment . these instruments normally have maturities of up to three years and are standard in the .\nQuestion: what was the difference in total contractual obligations between 2006 and 2010?\nAnswer: 360.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.36923" } ]
CONVFINQA5848	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkinder morgan , inc . form 10-k indicate by check mark whether the registrant ( 1 ) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15 ( d ) of the securities exchange act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months ( or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports ) , and ( 2 ) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days . yes f06f no f0fe indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website , if any , every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to rule 405 of regulation s-t during the preceding 12 months ( or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files ) . yes f06f no f06f indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of regulation s-k is not contained herein , and will not be contained , to the best of registrant 2019s knowledge , in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in part iii of this form 10-k or any amendment to this form 10-k . f0fe indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer , an accelerated filer , a non-accelerated filer , or a smaller reporting company ( as defined in rule 12b-2 of the securities exchange act of 1934 ) . large accelerated filer f06f accelerated filer f06f non-accelerated filer f0fe smaller reporting company f06f indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company ( as defined in rule 12b-2 of the securities exchange act of 1934 ) . yes f06f no f0fe as of june 30 , 2010 , the registrant was a privately held company , and therefore the market value of its common equity held by nonaffiliates was zero . as of february 16 , 2011 , the registrant had the following number of shares of common stock outstanding: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>class a common stock</td><td>597213410</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>class b common stock</td><td>100000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class c common stock</td><td>2462927</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class p common stock</td><td>109786590</td></tr></table> explanatory note prior to the consummation of its february 2011 initial public offering , kinder morgan , inc. , was a delaware limited liability company named kinder morgan holdco llc whose unitholders became stockholders of kinder morgan , inc . upon the completion of its initial public offering . except as disclosed in the accompanying report , the consolidated financial statements and selected historical consolidated financial data and other historical financial information included in this report are those of kinder morgan holdco llc or its predecessor and their respective subsidiaries and do not give effect to the conversion . kinder morgan holdco llc 2019s wholly owned subsidiary , kinder morgan , inc. , who was not the registrant under our initial public offering , has changed its name to kinder morgan kansas , inc. .\nQuestion: what is the number of class a common stock?\nAnswer: 597213410.0\nQuestion: what is the number of class b stock?\nAnswer: 100000000.0\nQuestion: what is the sum of class a and b stock?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "697213410.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8607	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds . these awards vested in january 2015 . the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited . in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded . in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) . distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period . during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan . the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service . because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date . rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years . rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant . rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>14.93% ( 14.93 % )</td><td>17.78% ( 17.78 % )</td><td>19.37% ( 19.37 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.07% ( 1.07 % )</td><td>0.75% ( 0.75 % )</td><td>0.40% ( 0.40 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grant date fair value per share</td><td>$ 62.10</td><td>$ 45.45</td><td>$ 40.13</td></tr></table> the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years . the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the total grant date fair value of rsus vested in 2014?\nAnswer: 11.0\nQuestion: what is that less 9?\nAnswer: 2.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.22222" } ]
CONVFINQA451	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\navailable information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestregroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector during the fourth quarter of 2014 . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 62.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1300.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010</td><td>571.1</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .\nQuestion: what was the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2014?\nAnswer: 62.2\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013?\nAnswer: 195.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the combined total for both years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "257.2" } ]
CONVFINQA9455	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/25/2009</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>97.43</td><td>101.85</td><td>88.54</td><td>151.43</td><td>183.29</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>116.52</td><td>125.94</td><td>145.09</td><td>184.52</td><td>216.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>121.00</td><td>132.42</td><td>124.95</td><td>163.20</td><td>207.93</td></tr></table> dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .\nQuestion: what is the value of an investment in applied materials\t in 2012?\nAnswer: 88.54\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: -11.46\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.1146" } ]
CONVFINQA4945	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nan average of 7.1 in 2000 . the top 100 largest clients used an average of 11.3 products in 2001 , up from an average of 11.2 in 2000 . state street benefits significantly from its ability to derive revenue from the transaction flows of clients . this occurs through the management of cash positions , including deposit balances and other short-term investment activities , using state street 2019s balance sheet capacity . significant foreign currency transaction volumes provide potential for foreign exchange trading revenue as well . fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) . growth in servicing fees of $ 199million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , was the primary contributor to the increase in fee revenue . this growth primarily reflects several large client wins installed starting in the latter half of 2000 and continuing throughout 2001 , and strength in fee revenue from securities lending . declines in equity market values worldwide offset some of the growth in servicing fees . management fees were down 5% ( 5 % ) , adjusted for the formation of citistreet , reflecting the decline in theworldwide equitymarkets . foreign exchange trading revenue was down 5% ( 5 % ) , reflecting lower currency volatility , and processing fees and other revenue was up 21% ( 21 % ) , primarily due to gains on the sales of investment securities . servicing and management fees are a function of several factors , including the mix and volume of assets under custody and assets under management , securities positions held , and portfolio transactions , as well as types of products and services used by clients . state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) . if bond values were to increase or decrease by 10% ( 10 % ) , state street would anticipate a corresponding change of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) in its total revenue . securities lending revenue in 2001 increased approximately 40% ( 40 % ) over 2000 . securities lending revenue is reflected in both servicing fees and management fees . securities lending revenue is a function of the volume of securities lent and interest rate spreads . while volumes increased in 2001 , the year-over-year increase is primarily due to wider interest rate spreads resulting from the unusual occurrence of eleven reductions in the u.s . federal funds target rate during 2001 . f e e r e v e n u e ( dollars in millions ) 2001 ( 1 ) 2000 1999 ( 2 ) change adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td><td>2000</td><td>1999 ( 2 )</td><td>change 00-01</td><td>adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>servicing fees</td><td>$ 1624</td><td>$ 1425</td><td>$ 1170</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>management fees</td><td>511</td><td>581</td><td>600</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange trading</td><td>368</td><td>387</td><td>306</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>processing fees and other</td><td>329</td><td>272</td><td>236</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total fee revenue</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 2665</td><td>$ 2312</td><td>6</td><td>8</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 2001 results exclude the write-off of state street 2019s total investment in bridge of $ 50 million ( 2 ) 1999 results exclude the one-time charge of $ 57 million related to the repositioning of the investment portfolio ( 3 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet 4 state street corporation .\nQuestion: how much did the servicing fees change between 1999 and 2000?\nAnswer: 255.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change during this time?\nAnswer: 0.21795\nQuestion: how much did the fee revenue change between 2000 and 2001?\nAnswer: 167.0\nQuestion: so what was the growth rate during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.06266" } ]
CONVFINQA2507	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhas decreased during the period from 2002 to 2004 , principally due to the increase in earned premium and due to cost containment measures undertaken by management . in business insurance and personal lines , the expense ratio is expected to decrease further in 2005 , largely as a result of expected increases in earned premium . in specialty commercial , the expense ratio is expected to increase slightly in 2005 due to changes in the business mix , most notably the company 2019s decision in the fourth quarter of 2004 to exit the multi-peril crop insurance program which will eliminate significant expense reimbursements from the specialty commercial segment . policyholder dividend ratio : the policyholder dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholder dividends to earned premium . combined ratio : the combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio , the expense ratio and the policyholder dividend ratio . this ratio is a relative measurement that describes the related cost of losses and expense for every $ 100 of earned premiums . a combined ratio below 100.0 demonstrates underwriting profit ; a combined ratio above 100.0 demonstrates underwriting losses . the combined ratio has decreased from 2003 to 2004 primarily because of improvement in the expense ratio . the combined ratio in 2005 could be significantly higher or lower than the 2004 combined ratio depending on the level of catastrophe losses , but will also be impacted by changes in pricing and an expected moderation in favorable loss cost trends . catastrophe ratio : the catastrophe ratio ( a component of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio ) represents the ratio of catastrophe losses ( net of reinsurance ) to earned premiums . a catastrophe is an event that causes $ 25 or more in industry insured property losses and affects a significant number of property and casualty policyholders and insurers . by their nature , catastrophe losses vary dramatically from year to year . based on the mix and geographic dispersion of premium written and estimates derived from various catastrophe loss models , the company 2019s expected catastrophe ratio over the long-term is 3.0 points . before considering the reduction in ongoing operation 2019s catastrophe reserves related to september 11 of $ 298 in 2004 , the catastrophe ratio in 2004 was 5.3 points . see 201crisk management strategy 201d below for a discussion of the company 2019s property catastrophe risk management program that serves to mitigate the company 2019s net exposure to catastrophe losses . combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development : the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development represents the combined ratio for the current accident year , excluding the impact of catastrophes . the company believes this ratio is an important measure of the trend in profitability since it removes the impact of volatile and unpredictable catastrophe losses and prior accident year reserve development . before considering catastrophes , the combined ratio related to current accident year business has improved from 2002 to 2004 principally due to earned pricing increases and favorable claim frequency . other operations underwriting results : the other operations segment is responsible for managing operations of the hartford that have discontinued writing new or renewal business as well as managing the claims related to asbestos and environmental exposures . as such , neither earned premiums nor underwriting ratios are meaningful financial measures . instead , management believes that underwriting result is a more meaningful measure . the net underwriting loss for 2002 through 2004 is primarily due to prior accident year loss development , including $ 2.6 billion of net asbestos reserve strengthening in 2003 . reserve estimates within other operations , including estimates for asbestos and environmental claims , are inherently uncertain . refer to the other operations segment md&a for further discussion of other operation's underwriting results . total property & casualty investment earnings . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment yield after-tax</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>4.2% ( 4.2 % )</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized capital gains ( losses ) after-tax</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 165</td><td>$ -44 ( 44 )</td></tr></table> the investment return , or yield , on property & casualty 2019s invested assets is an important element of the company 2019s earnings since insurance products are priced with the assumption that premiums received can be invested for a period of time before loss and loss adjustment expenses are paid . for longer tail lines , such as workers 2019 compensation and general liability , claims are paid over several years and , therefore , the premiums received for these lines of business can generate significant investment income . him determines the appropriate allocation of investments by asset class and measures the investment yield performance for each asset class against market indices or other benchmarks . due to the emphasis on preservation of capital and the need to maintain sufficient liquidity to satisfy claim obligations , the vast majority of property and casualty 2019s invested assets have been held in fixed maturities , including , among other asset classes , corporate bonds , municipal bonds , government debt , short-term debt , mortgage- .\nQuestion: what is the net realized capital gain after tax in 2004?\nAnswer: 87.0\nQuestion: what about in 2003?\nAnswer: 165.0\nQuestion: what is the total gains for 2003 and 2004?\nAnswer: 252.0\nQuestion: what about if losses from 2002 are added?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "208.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3526	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npurchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>6091605</td><td>$ 158.20</td><td>6087727</td><td>32831024</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>3408467</td><td>147.91</td><td>3402190</td><td>29428834</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>3007951</td><td>148.40</td><td>3000715</td><td>26428119</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>12508023</td><td>$ 153.04</td><td>12490632</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .\nQuestion: what was the total number of shares repurchased in 2018, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "57.66975" } ]
CONVFINQA9566	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.03</td><td>$ 108.98</td><td>$ 148.98</td><td>$ 163.71</td><td>$ 177.40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>76.82</td><td>102.19</td><td>140.77</td><td>153.96</td><td>154.71</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>82.94</td><td>106.78</td><td>144.79</td><td>166.76</td><td>164.15</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.44</td><td>156.78</td><td>178.22</td><td>180.67</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) .\nQuestion: what was the price for the s&p financial index in 2015?\nAnswer: 164.15\nQuestion: what was the change in the 2015 price and the initial $100 investment?\nAnswer: 64.15\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.6415" } ]
CONVFINQA4106	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .\nQuestion: what was net revenues at the end of 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "239.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3073	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis the risk committee of the board and the risk governance committee ( through delegated authority from the firmwide risk committee ) approve market risk limits and sub-limits at firmwide , business and product levels , consistent with our risk appetite statement . in addition , market risk management ( through delegated authority from the risk governance committee ) sets market risk limits and sub-limits at certain product and desk levels . the purpose of the firmwide limits is to assist senior management in controlling our overall risk profile . sub-limits are set below the approved level of risk limits . sub-limits set the desired maximum amount of exposure that may be managed by any particular business on a day-to-day basis without additional levels of senior management approval , effectively leaving day-to-day decisions to individual desk managers and traders . accordingly , sub-limits are a management tool designed to ensure appropriate escalation rather than to establish maximum risk tolerance . sub-limits also distribute risk among various businesses in a manner that is consistent with their level of activity and client demand , taking into account the relative performance of each area . our market risk limits are monitored daily by market risk management , which is responsible for identifying and escalating , on a timely basis , instances where limits have been exceeded . when a risk limit has been exceeded ( e.g. , due to positional changes or changes in market conditions , such as increased volatilities or changes in correlations ) , it is escalated to senior managers in market risk management and/or the appropriate risk committee . such instances are remediated by an inventory reduction and/or a temporary or permanent increase to the risk limit . model review and validation our var and stress testing models are regularly reviewed by market risk management and enhanced in order to incorporate changes in the composition of positions included in our market risk measures , as well as variations in market conditions . prior to implementing significant changes to our assumptions and/or models , model risk management performs model validations . significant changes to our var and stress testing models are reviewed with our chief risk officer and chief financial officer , and approved by the firmwide risk committee . see 201cmodel risk management 201d for further information about the review and validation of these models . systems we have made a significant investment in technology to monitor market risk including : 2030 an independent calculation of var and stress measures ; 2030 risk measures calculated at individual position levels ; 2030 attribution of risk measures to individual risk factors of each position ; 2030 the ability to report many different views of the risk measures ( e.g. , by desk , business , product type or entity ) ; 2030 the ability to produce ad hoc analyses in a timely manner . metrics we analyze var at the firmwide level and a variety of more detailed levels , including by risk category , business , and region . the tables below present average daily var and period-end var , as well as the high and low var for the period . diversification effect in the tables below represents the difference between total var and the sum of the vars for the four risk categories . this effect arises because the four market risk categories are not perfectly correlated . the table below presents average daily var by risk category. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2017</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates</td><td>$ 40</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity prices</td><td>24</td><td>25</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currency rates</td><td>12</td><td>21</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodity prices</td><td>13</td><td>17</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>diversification effect</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-45 ( 45 )</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 76</td></tr></table> our average daily var decreased to $ 54 million in 2017 from $ 63 million in 2016 , due to reductions across all risk categories , partially offset by a decrease in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was primarily due to lower levels of volatility . our average daily var decreased to $ 63 million in 2016 from $ 76 million in 2015 , due to reductions across all risk categories , partially offset by a decrease in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was primarily due to reduced exposures . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 91 .\nQuestion: what was the change in interest rates from 2016 to 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-5.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1156	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 : market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities motorola 2019s common stock is listed on the new york and chicago stock exchanges . the number of stockholders of record of motorola common stock on january 31 , 2008 was 79907 . information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to the information under the caption 201cequity compensation plan information 201d of motorola 2019s proxy statement for the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders . the remainder of the response to this item incorporates by reference note 16 , 201cquarterly and other financial data ( unaudited ) 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements appearing under 201citem 8 : financial statements and supplementary data 201d . the following table provides information with respect to acquisitions by the company of shares of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 . issuer purchases of equity securities period ( a ) total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( b ) average price paid per share ( 1 ) ( 3 ) ( c ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 2 ) ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>( a ) total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) ( 2 )</td><td>( b ) average price paid per share ( 1 ) ( 3 )</td><td>( c ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 2 )</td><td>( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>9/30/07 to 10/26/07</td><td>2972951</td><td>$ 18.84</td><td>2964225</td><td>$ 4267375081</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>10/27/07 to 11/23/07</td><td>5709917</td><td>$ 17.23</td><td>5706600</td><td>$ 4169061854</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>11/24/07 to 12/31/07</td><td>25064045</td><td>$ 16.04</td><td>25064045</td><td>$ 3767061887</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>33746913</td><td>$ 16.49</td><td>33734870</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in addition to purchases under the 2006 stock repurchase program ( as defined below ) , included in this column are transactions under the company 2019s equity compensation plans involving the delivery to the company of 12043 shares of motorola common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to company employees . ( 2 ) through actions taken on july 24 , 2006 and march 21 , 2007 , the board of directors has authorized the company to repurchase an aggregate amount of up to $ 7.5 billion of its outstanding shares of common stock over a period ending in june 2009 , subject to market conditions ( the 201c2006 stock repurchase program 201d ) . ( 3 ) average price paid per share of common stock repurchased under the 2006 stock repurchase program is execution price , excluding commissions paid to brokers. .\nQuestion: in 2007, what was the number of shares purchased after november 24?\nAnswer: 25064045.0\nQuestion: and what was the total number of shares purchased between september 30 and december 31 of that year?\nAnswer: 33746913.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total did that november number represent?\nAnswer: 0.74271\nQuestion: and concerning only the period between september 30 and october 26, how many shares could still be bought under the plans or programs, considering the average price?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "226506108.33333" } ]
CONVFINQA5724	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nproceeds from the sale of equity securities . from time to time , we raise funds through public offerings of our equity securities . in addition , we receive proceeds from sales of our equity securities pursuant to our stock option and stock purchase plans . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we received approximately $ 40.6 million in proceeds from sales of shares of our class a common stock and the common stock of atc mexico pursuant to our stock option and stock purchase plans . financing activities during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we took several actions to increase our financial flexibility and reduce our interest costs . new credit facility . in may 2004 , we refinanced our previous credit facility with a new $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility . at closing , we received $ 685.5 million of net proceeds from the borrowings under the new facility , after deducting related expenses and fees , approximately $ 670.0 million of which we used to repay principal and interest under the previous credit facility . we used the remaining net proceeds of $ 15.5 million for general corporate purposes , including the repurchase of other outstanding debt securities . the new credit facility consists of the following : 2022 $ 400.0 million in undrawn revolving loan commitments , against which approximately $ 19.3 million of undrawn letters of credit were outstanding at december 31 , 2004 , maturing on february 28 , 2011 ; 2022 a $ 300.0 million term loan a , which is fully drawn , maturing on february 28 , 2011 ; and 2022 a $ 398.0 million term loan b , which is fully drawn , maturing on august 31 , 2011 . the new credit facility extends the previous credit facility maturity dates from 2007 to 2011 for a majority of the borrowings outstanding , subject to earlier maturity upon the occurrence of certain events described below , and allows us to use credit facility borrowings and internally generated funds to repurchase other indebtedness without additional lender approval . the new credit facility is guaranteed by us and is secured by a pledge of substantially all of our assets . the maturity date for term loan a and any outstanding revolving loans will be accelerated to august 15 , 2008 , and the maturity date for term loan b will be accelerated to october 31 , 2008 , if ( 1 ) on or prior to august 1 , 2008 , our 93 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior notes have not been ( a ) refinanced with parent company indebtedness having a maturity date of february 28 , 2012 or later or with loans under the new credit facility , or ( b ) repaid , prepaid , redeemed , repurchased or otherwise retired , and ( 2 ) our consolidated leverage ratio ( total parent company debt to annualized operating cash flow ) at june 30 , 2008 is greater than 4.50 to 1.00 . if this were to occur , the payments due in 2008 for term loan a and term loan b would be $ 225.0 million and $ 386.0 million , respectively . note offerings . during 2004 , we raised approximately $ 1.1 billion in net proceeds from the sale of debt securities through institutional private placements as follows ( in millions ) : debt security date of offering principal amount approximate net proceeds . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>debt security</td><td>date of offering</td><td>principal amount</td><td>approximate net proceeds</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012</td><td>february 2004</td><td>$ 225.0</td><td>$ 221.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>3.00% ( 3.00 % ) convertible notes due august 15 2012</td><td>august 2004</td><td>345.0</td><td>335.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012</td><td>october 2004</td><td>300.0</td><td>292.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012</td><td>december 2004</td><td>200.0</td><td>199.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>-</td><td>$ 1070.0</td><td>$ 1050.2</td></tr></table> 2022 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes offering . in february 2004 , we sold $ 225.0 million principal amount of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 through an institutional private placement . the 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes mature on may 1 , 2012 , and interest is payable semiannually in arrears on may 1 and november 1 of each year. .\nQuestion: what was the principal amount of the 7.5% senior notes issued february 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "225.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3437	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrepublic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 12 . share repurchases and dividends share repurchases share repurchase activity during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 follows ( in millions except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>number of shares repurchased</td><td>10.7</td><td>9.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amount paid</td><td>$ 736.9</td><td>$ 610.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average cost per share</td><td>$ 69.06</td><td>$ 63.84</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no repurchased shares pending settlement . in october 2017 , our board of directors added $ 2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31 , 2020 . share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws . while the board of directors has approved the program , the timing of any purchases , the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management , at its discretion , and will depend upon market conditions and other factors . the share repurchase program may be extended , suspended or discontinued at any time . as of december 31 , 2018 , the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $ 1.1 billion . dividends in october 2018 , our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $ 0.375 per share . cash dividends declared were $ 468.4 million , $ 446.3 million and $ 423.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $ 121.0 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2 , 2019 . 13 . earnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services , inc . by the weighted average number of common shares ( including vested but unissued rsus ) outstanding during the period . diluted earnings per share is based on the combined weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding , which include , where appropriate , the assumed exercise of employee stock options , unvested rsus and unvested psus at the expected attainment levels . we use the treasury stock method in computing diluted earnings per share. .\nQuestion: what is the amount of cash dividend declared in 2018?\nAnswer: 468.4\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "446.3" } ]
CONVFINQA2454	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 94417</td><td>$ 10258</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill acquired as part of acquisition</td><td>2014</td><td>84159</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>working capital settlement</td><td>-1225 ( 1225 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impairment loss</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 93192</td><td>$ 94417</td></tr></table> goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment . goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate . the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value . an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified . the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit . in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach . under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data . other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 . the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon . with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable . we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the company's goodwill balance between the beginning of 2016 and the end of 2017?\nAnswer: 82934.0\nQuestion: and what was the total value of the company's goodwill balance in the beginning of 2016?\nAnswer: 10258.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this total value, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.08481" } ]
CONVFINQA8938	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of a liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and political and economic conditions in certain countries . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company- specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons ( overnight , one week , two weeks , one month , three months , one year ) and over a variety of stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains a series of contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal measures that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . in december 2016 , the federal reserve board adopted final rules which require additional disclosures relating to the lcr of large financial institutions , including citi . among other things , the final rules require citi to disclose components of its average hqla , lcr and inflows and outflows each quarter . in addition , the final rules require disclosure of citi 2019s calculation of the maturity mismatch add-on as well as other qualitative disclosures . the effective date for these disclosures is april 1 , 2017 . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td><td>sept . 30 2016</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 403.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td><td>$ 389.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>332.5</td><td>335.3</td><td>344.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>113% ( 113 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 71.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 44.8</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased both year-over-year and sequentially . the increase year-over-year was driven by both an increase in hqla and a reduction in net outflows . sequentially , the increase was driven by a slight reduction in net outflows , as hqla remained largely unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in the second quarter of 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . standardized weightings would be required to be applied to the various asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2016 , it will need to evaluate any final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2017 . the proposed rules would require full implementation of the u.s . nsfr beginning january 1 , 2018. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the lcr from 2014 to 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7844	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ngoodwill is reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment . in addition , the company performs an impairment analysis of other intangible assets based on the occurrence of other factors . such factors include , but are not limited to , significant changes in membership , state funding , medical contracts and provider networks and contracts . an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of intangible assets exceeds the implied fair value . medical claims liabilities medical services costs include claims paid , claims reported but not yet paid , or inventory , estimates for claims incurred but not yet received , or ibnr , and estimates for the costs necessary to process unpaid claims . the estimates of medical claims liabilities are developed using standard actuarial methods based upon historical data for payment patterns , cost trends , product mix , sea- sonality , utilization of healthcare services and other rele- vant factors including product changes . these estimates are continually reviewed and adjustments , if necessary , are reflected in the period known . management did not change actuarial methods during the years presented . management believes the amount of medical claims payable is reasonable and adequate to cover the company 2019s liability for unpaid claims as of december 31 , 2006 ; however , actual claim payments may differ from established estimates . revenue recognition the company 2019s medicaid managed care segment gener- ates revenues primarily from premiums received from the states in which it operates health plans . the company receives a fixed premium per member per month pursuant to our state contracts . the company generally receives premium payments during the month it provides services and recognizes premium revenue during the period in which it is obligated to provide services to its members . some states enact premium taxes or similar assessments , collectively premium taxes , and these taxes are recorded as general and administrative expenses . some contracts allow for additional premium related to certain supplemen- tal services provided such as maternity deliveries . revenues are recorded based on membership and eligibility data provided by the states , which may be adjusted by the states for updates to this data . these adjustments have been immaterial in relation to total revenue recorded and are reflected in the period known . the company 2019s specialty services segment generates revenues under contracts with state programs , healthcare organizations and other commercial organizations , as well as from our own subsidiaries on market-based terms . revenues are recognized when the related services are provided or as ratably earned over the covered period of service . premium and services revenues collected in advance are recorded as unearned revenue . for performance-based contracts the company does not recognize revenue subject to refund until data is sufficient to measure performance . premiums and service revenues due to the company are recorded as premium and related receivables and are recorded net of an allowance based on historical trends and management 2019s judgment on the collectibility of these accounts . as the company generally receives payments during the month in which services are provided , the allowance is typically not significant in comparison to total revenues and does not have a material impact on the pres- entation of the financial condition or results of operations . activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowances beginning of year</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>512</td><td>80</td><td>407</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs of uncollectible receivables</td><td>-700 ( 700 )</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>-552 ( 552 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allowances end of year</td><td>$ 155</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 462</td></tr></table> significant customers centene receives the majority of its revenues under con- tracts or subcontracts with state medicaid managed care programs . the contracts , which expire on various dates between june 30 , 2007 and december 31 , 2011 , are expected to be renewed . contracts with the states of georgia , indiana , kansas , texas and wisconsin each accounted for 15% ( 15 % ) , 15% ( 15 % ) , 10% ( 10 % ) , 17% ( 17 % ) and 16% ( 16 % ) , respectively , of the company 2019s revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . reinsurance centene has purchased reinsurance from third parties to cover eligible healthcare services . the current reinsurance program covers 90% ( 90 % ) of inpatient healthcare expenses in excess of annual deductibles of $ 300 to $ 500 per member , up to an annual maximum of $ 2000 . centene 2019s medicaid managed care subsidiaries are responsible for inpatient charges in excess of an average daily per diem . in addition , bridgeway participates in a risk-sharing program as part of its contract with the state of arizona for the reimbursement of certain contract service costs beyond a monetary threshold . reinsurance recoveries were $ 3674 , $ 4014 , and $ 3730 , in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4842 , $ 4105 , and $ 6724 in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . reinsurance recoveries , net of expenses , are included in medical costs . other income ( expense ) other income ( expense ) consists principally of investment income and interest expense . investment income is derived from the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , restricted deposits and investments. .\nQuestion: what was the value for year end allowance for uncollectible accounts in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "155.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2077	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries ; and 2022 sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies . subject to certain exceptions , the indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes permit the issuers of the notes and their restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness , including secured indebtedness . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . principal payments scheduled to be made on the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total ( in $ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1485</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter ( 1 )</td><td>1590</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>3498</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans in north america , europe and asia . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 84% ( 84 % ) and 76% ( 76 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . pension costs under the company 2019s retirement plans are actuarially determined . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in north america , europe , and asia covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . the company 2019s matching contribution to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and aggregated $ 11 million , $ 12 million , $ 8 million and $ 3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 and the three months ended march 31 , 2004 , respectively . celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what portion of the total principal payments is due after 2011?\nAnswer: 0.45455\nQuestion: what is the total principal payments as of march 31,2006?\nAnswer: 3498.0\nQuestion: what is the amount of principal payments due after 2011?\nAnswer: 1590.0\nQuestion: what about the amount due from 2007 to 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1908.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6763	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . equity compensation plans 2019 information is incorporated by reference from part iii , item 12 , 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters , 201d of this document , and should be considered an integral part of item 5 . at january 31 , 2016 , there were 84607 shareholders of record . 3m 2019s stock is listed on the new york stock exchange , inc . ( nyse ) , the chicago stock exchange , inc. , and the swx swiss exchange . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 1.025 per share for each of the second , third , and fourth quarters of 2015 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2014 included a dividend paid in november 2014 of $ 0.855 per share and a dividend paid in march 2015 of $ 1.025 per share . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 0.855 per share for each of the second and third quarters of 2014 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2013 include a dividend paid in march 2014 of $ 0.855 per share . stock price comparisons follow : stock price comparisons ( nyse composite transactions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( per share amounts )</td><td>first quarter</td><td>second quarter</td><td>third quarter</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 high</td><td>$ 170.50</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 157.94</td><td>$ 160.09</td><td>$ 170.50</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015 low</td><td>157.74</td><td>153.92</td><td>134.00</td><td>138.57</td><td>134.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014 high</td><td>$ 139.29</td><td>$ 145.53</td><td>$ 147.87</td><td>$ 168.16</td><td>$ 168.16</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014 low</td><td>123.61</td><td>132.02</td><td>138.43</td><td>130.60</td><td>123.61</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities repurchases of 3m common stock are made to support the company 2019s stock-based employee compensation plans and for other corporate purposes . in february 2014 , 3m 2019s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 12 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date . in february 2016 , 3m 2019s board of directors replaced the company 2019s february 2014 repurchase program with a new repurchase program . this new program authorizes the repurchase of up to $ 10 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the amount of shares authorized for repurchase between 2014 and 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-2.0" } ]
CONVFINQA292	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 8 . acquisitions during fiscal 2017 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 142.8 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 4.2 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 76.4 million of acquired intangible assets ( of which $ 71.5 million represents in-process technology ) , $ 90.2 million of goodwill and $ 19.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred tax liabilities . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other performance-based conditions , through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 . during fiscal 2016 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 42.4 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 1.8 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 23.6 million of goodwill , $ 23.2 million of acquired intangible assets and $ 2.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred revenue . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other conditions , through the second quarter of fiscal a trust for the benefit of the children of lip-bu tan , cadence 2019s chief executive officer ( 201cceo 201d ) and director , owned less than 3% ( 3 % ) of nusemi inc , one of the companies acquired in 2017 , and less than 2% ( 2 % ) of rocketick technologies ltd. , one of the companies acquired in 2016 . mr . tan and his wife serve as co-trustees of the trust and disclaim pecuniary and economic interest in the trust . the board of directors of cadence reviewed the transactions and concluded that it was in the best interests of cadence to proceed with the transactions . mr . tan recused himself from the board of directors 2019 discussion of the valuation of nusemi inc and rocketick technologies ltd . and on whether to proceed with the transactions . acquisition-related transaction costs there were no direct transaction costs associated with acquisitions during fiscal 2018 . transaction costs associated with acquisitions were $ 0.6 million and $ 1.1 million during fiscal 2017 and 2016 , respectively . these costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in cadence 2019s consolidated income statements . note 9 . goodwill and acquired intangibles goodwill the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2018 and 2017 were as follows : gross carrying amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>gross carryingamount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2016</td><td>$ 572764</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill resulting from acquisitions</td><td>90218</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>3027</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 30 2017</td><td>666009</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>-3737 ( 3737 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 29 2018</td><td>$ 662272</td></tr></table> cadence completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of fiscal 2018 and determined that the fair value of cadence 2019s single reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount of its net assets and that no impairment existed. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in goodwill between 12/30/17 and 12/29/18?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-3737.0" } ]
CONVFINQA696	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2014 to 2013 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013 net revenue</td><td>$ 5524</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>miso deferral</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 5735</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2013 and july 2014 . energy efficiency revenues are offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have minimal effect on net income ; 2022 the effect of the apsc 2019s order in entergy arkansas 2019s 2013 rate case , including an annual base rate increase effective january 2014 offset by a miso rider to provide customers credits in rates for transmission revenue received through miso ; 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mspc , effective september 2013 ; 2022 an increase in entergy mississippi 2019s storm damage rider , as approved by the mpsc , effective october 2013 . the increase in the storm damage rider is offset by other operation and maintenance expenses and has no effect on net income ; 2022 an annual base rate increase at entergy texas , effective april 2014 , as a result of the puct 2019s order in the september 2013 rate case ; and 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate proceedings . the asset retirement obligation affects net revenue because entergy records a regulatory debit or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation- related costs collected in revenue . the variance is primarily caused by increases in regulatory credits because of decreases in decommissioning trust earnings and increases in depreciation and accretion expenses and increases in regulatory credits to realign the asset retirement obligation regulatory assets with regulatory treatment . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 3129 gwh , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in billed electricity usage primarily due to an increase in sales to industrial customers and the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansions , recovery of a major refining customer from an unplanned outage in 2013 , and continued moderate growth in the manufacturing sector . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of the non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc , partially offset by the deferral in april 2013 , as approved by the apsc , of costs incurred from march 2010 through december 2012 related to the transition and implementation of joining the miso .\nQuestion: what was the net revenue in 2014?\nAnswer: 5735.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5524.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1459	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncorporate/other corporate/other includes global staff functions ( includes finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) and other corporate expense , global operations and technology ( o&t ) , residual corporate treasury and corporate items . at december 31 , 2009 , this segment had approximately $ 230 billion of assets , consisting primarily of the company 2019s liquidity portfolio , including $ 110 billion of cash and cash equivalents. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ -1663 ( 1663 )</td><td>$ -2680 ( 2680 )</td><td>$ -2008 ( 2008 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>-8893 ( 8893 )</td><td>422</td><td>-302 ( 302 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ -10556 ( 10556 )</td><td>$ -2258 ( 2258 )</td><td>$ -2310 ( 2310 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 1420</td><td>$ 510</td><td>$ 1813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ -11975 ( 11975 )</td><td>$ -2769 ( 2769 )</td><td>$ -4120 ( 4120 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income taxes ( benefits )</td><td>-4369 ( 4369 )</td><td>-587 ( 587 )</td><td>-1446 ( 1446 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ -7606 ( 7606 )</td><td>$ -2182 ( 2182 )</td><td>$ -2674 ( 2674 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes</td><td>-445 ( 445 )</td><td>4002</td><td>708</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ -8051 ( 8051 )</td><td>$ 1820</td><td>$ -1966 ( 1966 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>net income attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ -8051 ( 8051 )</td><td>$ 1820</td><td>$ -1968 ( 1968 )</td></tr></table> 2009 vs . 2008 revenues , net of interest expense declined , primarily due to the pretax loss on debt extinguishment related to the repayment of the $ 20 billion of tarp trust preferred securities and the pretax loss in connection with the exit from the loss-sharing agreement with the u.s . government . revenues also declined , due to the absence of the 2008 sale of citigroup global services limited recorded in o&t . this was partially offset by a pretax gain related to the exchange offers , revenues and higher intersegment eliminations . operating expenses increased , primarily due to intersegment eliminations and increases in compensation , partially offset by lower repositioning reserves . 2008 vs . 2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities . operating expenses declined , primarily due to lower restructuring charges in 2008 as well as reductions in incentive compensation and benefits expense. .\nQuestion: what were operating expenses in 2008?\nAnswer: 510.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2007?\nAnswer: 1813.0\nQuestion: what is the net difference?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-1303.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4641	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnew term loan a facility , with the remaining unpaid principal amount of loans under the new term loan a facility due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 . principal amounts outstanding under the new revolving loan facility are due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 , subject to earlier repayment pursuant to the springing maturity date described above . in addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the borrowings , we are obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee at a rate determined by reference to a total leverage ratio , with a maximum commitment fee of 40% ( 40 % ) of the applicable margin for eurocurrency loans . in july 2016 , breakaway four , ltd. , as borrower , and nclc , as guarantor , entered into a supplemental agreement , which amended the breakaway four loan to , among other things , increase the aggregate principal amount of commitments under the multi-draw term loan credit facility from 20ac590.5 million to 20ac729.9 million . in june 2016 , we took delivery of seven seas explorer . to finance the payment due upon delivery , we had export credit financing in place for 80% ( 80 % ) of the contract price . the associated $ 373.6 million term loan bears interest at 3.43% ( 3.43 % ) with a maturity date of june 30 , 2028 . principal and interest payments shall be paid semiannually . in december 2016 , nclc issued $ 700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior unsecured notes due december 2021 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) in a private offering ( the 201coffering 201d ) at par . nclc used the net proceeds from the offering , after deducting the initial purchasers 2019 discount and estimated fees and expenses , together with cash on hand , to purchase its outstanding 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 having an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $ 680 million . the redemption of the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 was completed in january 2017 . nclc will pay interest on the notes at 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) per annum , semiannually on june 15 and december 15 of each year , commencing on june 15 , 2017 , to holders of record at the close of business on the immediately preceding june 1 and december 1 , respectively . nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or part , at any time prior to december 15 , 2018 , at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but not including , the redemption date and a 201cmake-whole premium . 201d nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or in part , on or after december 15 , 2018 , at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the notes . at any time ( which may be more than once ) on or prior to december 15 , 2018 , nclc may choose to redeem up to 40% ( 40 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes at a redemption price equal to 104.750% ( 104.750 % ) of the face amount thereof with an amount equal to the net proceeds of one or more equity offerings , so long as at least 60% ( 60 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes issued remains outstanding following such redemption . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants that limit nclc 2019s ability ( and its restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability ) to , among other things : ( i ) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares ; ( ii ) pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments ; ( iii ) create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other distributions to nclc from its restricted subsidiaries ; ( iv ) create liens on certain assets to secure debt ; ( v ) make certain investments ; ( vi ) engage in transactions with affiliates ; ( vii ) engage in sales of assets and subsidiary stock ; and ( viii ) transfer all or substantially all of its assets or enter into merger or consolidation transactions . the indenture governing the notes also provides for events of default , which , if any of them occurs , would permit or require the principal , premium ( if any ) , interest and other monetary obligations on all of the then-outstanding notes to become due and payable immediately . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2016 was $ 276.9 million which included $ 34.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 27.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 221.9 million which included $ 36.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 12.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 151.8 million which included $ 32.3 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and $ 15.4 million of expenses related to financing transactions in connection with the acquisition of prestige . certain of our debt agreements contain covenants that , among other things , require us to maintain a minimum level of liquidity , as well as limit our net funded debt-to-capital ratio , maintain certain other ratios and restrict our ability to pay dividends . substantially all of our ships and other property and equipment are pledged as collateral for certain of our debt . we believe we were in compliance with these covenants as of december 31 , 2016 . the following are scheduled principal repayments on long-term debt including capital lease obligations as of december 31 , 2016 for each of the next five years ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 560193</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>554846</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>561687</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>1153733</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>2193823</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1490322</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 6514604</td></tr></table> we had an accrued interest liability of $ 32.5 million and $ 34.2 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the interest expense-net , from 2015 to 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "55.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1014	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 105</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 198</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>126</td><td>146</td><td>149</td><td>172</td><td>228</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>132</td><td>109</td><td>141</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>98</td><td>121</td><td>93</td><td>122</td><td>168</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the kbw bank index in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "93.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1531	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) upon termination of employment , excluding retirement , all of a participant 2019s unvested awards are forfeited . however , when a participant terminates employment due to retirement , the participant generally retains all of their awards without providing additional service to the company . eligible retirement is dependent upon age and years of service , as follows : age 55 with ten years of service , age 60 with five years of service and age 65 with two years of service . compensation expense is recognized over the shorter of the vesting periods stated in the ltip , or the date the individual becomes eligible to retire . there are 11550 shares of class a common stock reserved for equity awards under the ltip . although the ltip permits the issuance of shares of class b common stock , no such shares have been reserved for issuance . shares issued as a result of option exercises and the conversions of rsus are expected to be funded with the issuance of new shares of class a common stock . stock options the fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation and the resulting weighted- average fair value per option granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free rate of return</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>4.4% ( 4.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected term ( in years )</td><td>6.17</td><td>6.25</td><td>6.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>41.7% ( 41.7 % )</td><td>37.9% ( 37.9 % )</td><td>30.9% ( 30.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>0.4% ( 0.4 % )</td><td>0.3% ( 0.3 % )</td><td>0.6% ( 0.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted-average fair value per option granted</td><td>$ 71.03</td><td>$ 78.54</td><td>$ 41.03</td></tr></table> the risk-free rate of return was based on the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect on the date of grant . the company utilizes the simplified method for calculating the expected term of the option based on the vesting terms and the contractual life of the option . the expected volatility for options granted during 2009 was based on the average of the implied volatility of mastercard and a blend of the historical volatility of mastercard and the historical volatility of a group of companies that management believes is generally comparable to mastercard . the expected volatility for options granted during 2008 was based on the average of the implied volatility of mastercard and the historical volatility of a group of companies that management believes is generally comparable to mastercard . as the company did not have sufficient publicly traded stock data historically , the expected volatility for options granted during 2007 was primarily based on the average of the historical and implied volatility of a group of companies that management believed was generally comparable to mastercard . the expected dividend yields were based on the company 2019s expected annual dividend rate on the date of grant. .\nQuestion: what was the risk free rate in 2009?\nAnswer: 2.5\nQuestion: what was the risk free rate in 2008?\nAnswer: 3.2\nQuestion: what was the net change in the risk free rate?\nAnswer: -0.7\nQuestion: what was the risk free rate in 2008?\nAnswer: 3.2\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.21875" } ]
CONVFINQA1412	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 11 2013 stock-based compensation during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 164 million , $ 189 million and $ 167 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated , net on our statements of earnings . the net impact to earnings for the respective years was $ 107 million , $ 122 million and $ 108 million . as of december 31 , 2014 , we had $ 91 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years . we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 308 million , $ 827 million and $ 440 million during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were reduced by $ 215 million , $ 158 million , $ 96 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements . stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) or other stock units . the exercise price of options to purchase common stock may not be less than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant . no award of stock options may become fully vested prior to the third anniversary of the grant and no portion of a stock option grant may become vested in less than one year . the minimum vesting period for restricted stock or stock units payable in stock is three years . award agreements may provide for shorter or pro-rated vesting periods or vesting following termination of employment in the case of death , disability , divestiture , retirement , change of control or layoff . the maximum term of a stock option or any other award is 10 years . at december 31 , 2014 , inclusive of the shares reserved for outstanding stock options , rsus and psus , we had 19 million shares reserved for issuance under the plans . at december 31 , 2014 , 7.8 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans . we issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options or when restrictions on rsus and psus have been satisfied . the following table summarizes activity related to nonvested rsus during 2014 : number of rsus ( in thousands ) weighted average grant-date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of rsus ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value pershare</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2011</td><td>4302</td><td>$ 78.25</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1987</td><td>81.93</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-1299 ( 1299 )</td><td>80.64</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-168 ( 168 )</td><td>79.03</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2012</td><td>4822</td><td>$ 79.10</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1356</td><td>89.24</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-2093 ( 2093 )</td><td>79.26</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-226 ( 226 )</td><td>81.74</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2013</td><td>3859</td><td>$ 82.42</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>745</td><td>146.85</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested</td><td>-2194 ( 2194 )</td><td>87.66</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-84 ( 84 )</td><td>91.11</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2014</td><td>2326</td><td>$ 97.80</td></tr></table> rsus are valued based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant . employees who are granted rsus receive the right to receive shares of stock after completion of the vesting period ; however , the shares are not issued and the employees cannot sell or transfer shares prior to vesting and have no voting rights until the rsus vest , generally three years from the date of the award . employees who are granted rsus receive dividend-equivalent cash payments only upon vesting . for these rsu awards , the grant-date fair value is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant less a discount to reflect the delay in payment of dividend-equivalent cash payments . we recognize the grant-date fair value of rsus , less estimated forfeitures , as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period , which beginning with the rsus granted in 2013 is shorter than the vesting period if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or will become retirement eligible before the end of the vesting period. .\nQuestion: what is the non-cash stock-based compensation expense in 2013?\nAnswer: 189.0\nQuestion: what about in 2012?\nAnswer: 167.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 22.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.13174\nQuestion: what about the non-cash stock-based compensation expense in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "164.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4393	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .\nQuestion: what was the change in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer: 2790.0\nQuestion: and what was that net cash in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "19018.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9287	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nis expected to begin by late-2018 , after the necessary information technology infrastructure is in place . entergy louisiana proposed to recover the cost of ami through the implementation of a customer charge , net of certain benefits , phased in over the period 2019 through 2022 . the parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of entergy louisiana 2019s proposed ami system , with modifications to the proposed customer charge . in july 2017 the lpsc approved the stipulation . entergy louisiana expects to recover the undepreciated balance of its existing meters through a regulatory asset at current depreciation rates . sources of capital entergy louisiana 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred membership interest issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 11173</td><td>$ 22503</td><td>$ 6154</td><td>$ 2815</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against $ 15 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 9.1 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . a0 as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 29.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit a0facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 65.7 million of loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 43.5 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 36.4 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy louisiana waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facilities . entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\nQuestion: what were receivables in 2017?\nAnswer: 11173.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22503.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8020	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 9 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>pension plans 2019</td><td>pension plans 2018</td><td>pension plans 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 134</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>107</td><td>90</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>( 180 )</td><td>( 154 )</td><td>( 112 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization of prior service credit</td><td>( 13 )</td><td>( 13 )</td><td>( 14 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of loss</td><td>78</td><td>78</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>10</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net pension cost</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 138</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans</td><td>$ 32</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 43</td></tr></table> net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 32 $ 34 $ 43 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2019 and 2018 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year . as further discussed in note 2 , upon adopting an accounting standard update on october 1 , 2018 , all components of the company 2019s net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs , aside from service cost , are recorded to other income ( expense ) , net on its consolidated statements of income , for all periods presented . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company .\nQuestion: what was the sum of the average pension cost in 2017 and 2018?\nAnswer: 272.0\nQuestion: what was the average pension cost in 2019?\nAnswer: 138.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "410.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3472	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\noperating profit for the segment decreased by 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . for the year , operating profit declines in defense more than offset an increase in civil , while operating profit at intelligence essentially was unchanged . the $ 27 million decrease in operating profit at defense primarily was attributable to a decrease in the level of favorable performance adjustments on mission and combat systems activities in 2010 . the $ 19 million increase in civil principally was due to higher volume on enterprise civilian services . operating profit for the segment decreased by 3% ( 3 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . operating profit declines in civil and intelligence partially were offset by growth in defense . the decrease of $ 29 million in civil 2019s operating profit primarily was attributable to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on enterprise civilian services programs in 2009 compared to 2008 . the decrease in operating profit of $ 27 million at intelligence mainly was due to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on security solution activities in 2009 compared to 2008 . the increase in defense 2019s operating profit of $ 29 million mainly was due to volume and improved performance in mission and combat systems . the decrease in backlog during 2010 compared to 2009 mainly was due to higher sales volume on enterprise civilian service programs at civil , including volume associated with the dris 2010 program , and mission and combat system programs at defense . backlog decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 due to u.s . government 2019s exercise of the termination for convenience clause on the tsat mission operations system ( tmos ) contract at defense , which resulted in a $ 1.6 billion reduction in orders . this decline more than offset increased orders on enterprise civilian services programs at civil . we expect is&gs will experience a low single digit percentage decrease in sales for 2011 as compared to 2010 . this decline primarily is due to completion of most of the work associated with the dris 2010 program . operating profit in 2011 is expected to decline in relationship to the decline in sales volume , while operating margins are expected to be comparable between the years . space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the design , research and development , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems , including activities related to the planned replacement of the space shuttle . government satellite programs include the advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , the mobile user objective system ( muos ) , the global positioning satellite iii ( gps iii ) system , the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , and the geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) . strategic and missile defense programs include the targets and countermeasures program and the fleet ballistic missile program . space transportation includes the nasa orion program and , through ownership interests in two joint ventures , expendable launch services ( united launch alliance , or ula ) and space shuttle processing activities for the u.s . government ( united space alliance , or usa ) . the space shuttle is expected to complete its final flight mission in 2011 and our involvement with its launch and processing activities will end at that time . space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8246</td><td>$ 8654</td><td>$ 8027</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>972</td><td>972</td><td>953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>11.2% ( 11.2 % )</td><td>11.9% ( 11.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>17800</td><td>16800</td><td>17900</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems decreased by 5% ( 5 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . sales declined in all three lines of business during the year . the $ 253 million decrease in space transportation principally was due to lower volume on the space shuttle external tank , commercial launch vehicle activity and other human space flight programs , which partially were offset by higher volume on the orion program . there were no commercial launches in 2010 compared to one commercial launch in 2009 . strategic & defensive missile systems ( s&dms ) sales declined $ 147 million principally due to lower volume on defensive missile programs . the $ 8 million sales decline in satellites primarily was attributable to lower volume on commercial satellites , which partially were offset by higher volume on government satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2010 and one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 . net sales for space systems increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . during the year , sales growth at satellites and space transportation offset a decline in s&dms . the sales growth of $ 707 million in satellites was due to higher volume in government satellite activities , which partially was offset by lower volume in commercial satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 and two deliveries in 2008 . the increase in sales of $ 21 million in space transportation primarily was due to higher volume on the orion program , which more than offset a decline in the space shuttle 2019s external tank program . there was one commercial launch in both 2009 and 2008 . s&dms 2019 sales decreased by $ 102 million mainly due to lower volume on defensive missile programs , which more than offset growth in strategic missile programs. .\nQuestion: what is the difference between the net sales and the operating profit in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7274.0" } ]
CONVFINQA992	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsources of blackrock 2019s operating cash primarily include investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue , performance fees , revenue from technology and risk management services , advisory and other revenue and distribution fees . blackrock uses its cash to pay all operating expense , interest and principal on borrowings , income taxes , dividends on blackrock 2019s capital stock , repurchases of the company 2019s stock , capital expenditures and purchases of co-investments and seed investments . for details of the company 2019s gaap cash flows from operating , investing and financing activities , see the consolidated statements of cash flows contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing . cash flows from operating activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , primarily include the receipt of investment advisory and administration fees , securities lending revenue and performance fees offset by the payment of operating expenses incurred in the normal course of business , including year-end incentive compensation accrued for in the prior year . cash outflows from investing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 517 million and primarily reflected $ 497 million of investment purchases , $ 155 million of purchases of property and equipment , $ 73 million related to the first reserve transaction and $ 29 million related to the cachematrix transaction , partially offset by $ 205 million of net proceeds from sales and maturities of certain investments . cash outflows from financing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 3094 million , primarily resulting from $ 1.4 billion of share repurchases , including $ 1.1 billion in open market- transactions and $ 321 million of employee tax withholdings related to employee stock transactions , $ 1.7 billion of cash dividend payments and $ 700 million of repayments of long- term borrowings , partially offset by $ 697 million of proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings . the company manages its financial condition and funding to maintain appropriate liquidity for the business . liquidity resources at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) december 31 , december 31 , cash and cash equivalents ( 1 ) $ 6894 $ 6091 cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 ) ( 63 ) ( 53 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents ( 1 )</td><td>$ 6894</td><td>$ 6091</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 )</td><td>-63 ( 63 )</td><td>-53 ( 53 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>subtotal</td><td>6831</td><td>6038</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit facility 2014 undrawn</td><td>4000</td><td>4000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total liquidity resources ( 3 )</td><td>$ 10831</td><td>$ 10038</td></tr></table> total liquidity resources ( 3 ) $ 10831 $ 10038 ( 1 ) the percentage of cash and cash equivalents held by the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries was approximately 40% ( 40 % ) and 50% ( 50 % ) at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . see net capital requirements herein for more information on net capital requirements in certain regulated subsidiaries . ( 2 ) the company cannot readily access such cash to use in its operating activities . ( 3 ) amounts do not reflect a reduction for year-end incentive compensation accruals of approximately $ 1.5 billion and $ 1.3 billion for 2017 and 2016 , respectively , which are paid in the first quarter of the following year . total liquidity resources increased $ 793 million during 2017 , primarily reflecting cash flows from operating activities , partially offset by cash payments of 2016 year-end incentive awards , share repurchases of $ 1.4 billion and cash dividend payments of $ 1.7 billion . a significant portion of the company 2019s $ 3154 million of total investments , as adjusted , is illiquid in nature and , as such , cannot be readily convertible to cash . share repurchases . the company repurchased 2.6 million common shares in open market transactions under the share repurchase program for approximately $ 1.1 billion during 2017 . at december 31 , 2017 , there were 6.4 million shares still authorized to be repurchased . net capital requirements . the company is required to maintain net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries within a number of jurisdictions , which is partially maintained by retaining cash and cash equivalent investments in those subsidiaries or jurisdictions . as a result , such subsidiaries of the company may be restricted in their ability to transfer cash between different jurisdictions and to their parents . additionally , transfers of cash between international jurisdictions may have adverse tax consequences that could discourage such transfers . blackrock institutional trust company , n.a . ( 201cbtc 201d ) is chartered as a national bank that does not accept client deposits and whose powers are limited to trust and other fiduciary activities . btc provides investment management services , including investment advisory and securities lending agency services , to institutional clients . btc is subject to regulatory capital and liquid asset requirements administered by the office of the comptroller of the currency . at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company was required to maintain approximately $ 1.8 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively , in net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries , including btc , entities regulated by the financial conduct authority and prudential regulation authority in the united kingdom , and the company 2019s broker-dealers . the company was in compliance with all applicable regulatory net capital requirements . undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries . as a result of the 2017 tax act and the one-time mandatory deemed repatriation tax on untaxed accumulated foreign earnings , a provisional amount of u.s . income taxes was provided on the undistributed foreign earnings . the financial statement basis in excess of tax basis of its foreign subsidiaries remains indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations . the company will continue to evaluate its capital management plans throughout 2018 . short-term borrowings 2017 revolving credit facility . the company 2019s credit facility has an aggregate commitment amount of $ 4.0 billion and was amended in april 2017 to extend the maturity date to april 2022 ( the 201c2017 credit facility 201d ) . the 2017 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2017 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 5.0 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2017 credit facility requires the company .\nQuestion: in the year of 2017, what amount from the liquidity comes from credit?\nAnswer: 4000.0\nQuestion: and what was that liquidity?\nAnswer: 10831.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of the liquidity did that amount represent?\nAnswer: 0.36931\nQuestion: in that same year, what was the total of cash and cash equivalents?\nAnswer: 6894.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6091.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5716	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements recognizing customer revenue , the company must assess the collectability of both the amounts billed and the portion recognized on a straight-line basis . this assessment takes customer credit risk and business and industry conditions into consideration to ultimately determine the collectability of the amounts billed . to the extent the amounts , based on management 2019s estimates , may not be collectible , recognition is deferred until such point as the uncertainty is resolved . any amounts which were previously recognized as revenue and subsequently determined to be uncollectible are charged to bad debt expense . accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts related to estimated losses resulting from a customer 2019s inability to make required payments and reserves for amounts invoiced whose collectability is not reasonably assured . these allowances are generally estimated based on payment patterns , days past due and collection history , and incorporate changes in economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical trends , such as customers in bankruptcy , liquidation or reorganization . receivables are written-off against the allowances when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1,</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td><td>$ 8850</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>16219</td><td>26771</td><td>12059</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recoveries and other</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td><td>-9733 ( 9733 )</td><td>-9427 ( 9427 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31,</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td></tr></table> the company 2019s largest international customer is iusacell , which is the brand name under which a group of companies controlled by grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201cgrupo iusacell 201d ) operates . iusacell represented approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the company 2019s total revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2010 . grupo iusacell has been engaged in a refinancing of a majority of its u.s . dollar denominated debt , and in connection with this process , two of the legal entities of the group , including grupo iusacell , voluntarily filed for a pre-packaged concurso mercantil ( a process substantially equivalent to chapter 11 of u.s . bankruptcy law ) with the backing of a majority of their financial creditors in december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , iusacell notes receivable , net , and related assets ( which include financing lease commitments and a deferred rent asset that are primarily long-term in nature ) were $ 19.7 million and $ 51.2 million , respectively . functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with its largest international customer , iusacell , which included , among other changes , converting all of iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company has determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional .\nQuestion: what was the value of the allowance balance for the uncollectable accounts at the end of the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "28520.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8303	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nregulatory balancing accounts accumulate differences between revenues recognized and authorized revenue requirements until they are collected from customers or are refunded . regulatory balancing accounts include low income programs and purchased power and water accounts . debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues . call premiums on the redemption of long- term debt , as well as unamortized debt expense , are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates . as a result of american water capital corp . 2019s prepayment of the 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series c senior notes due december 21 , 2018 ( 201cseries c senior notes 201d ) and 5.77% ( 5.77 % ) series d senior notes due december 21 , 2021 ( 201cseries d senior notes 201d ) and payment of a make-whole premium amount to the holders thereof of $ 34 million , the company recorded a $ 6 million charge resulting from the early extinguishment of debt at the parent company . substantially all of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the company 2019s utility subsidiaries were recorded as regulatory assets that the company believes are probable of recovery in future rates . approximately $ 1 million of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the company 2019s utility subsidiaries was amortized in 2017 . purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the company 2019s california utility subsidiary during 2002 , and acquisitions in 2007 by the company 2019s new jersey utility subsidiary . as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 . tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from two to fifteen years , as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service . other regulatory assets include certain construction costs for treatment facilities , property tax stabilization , employee-related costs , deferred other postretirement benefit expense , business services project expenses , coastal water project costs , rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others . these costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods . regulatory liabilities regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are probable of being credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process . also , if costs expected to be incurred in the future are currently being recovered through rates , the company records those expected future costs as regulatory liabilities . the following table summarizes the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income taxes recovered through rates</td><td>$ 1242</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>removal costs recovered through rates</td><td>315</td><td>316</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts</td><td>48</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>59</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total regulatory liabilities</td><td>$ 1664</td><td>$ 403</td></tr></table> income taxes recovered through rates relate to deferred taxes that will likely be refunded to the company 2019s customers . on december 22 , 2017 , the tcja was signed into law , which , among other things , enacted significant and complex changes to the internal revenue code of 1986 , including a reduction in the maximum u.s . federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) as of january 1 , 2018 . the tcja created significant .\nQuestion: what is the total total regulatory liabilities in 2017?\nAnswer: 1664.0\nQuestion: what about in 2016?\nAnswer: 403.0\nQuestion: what is the net increase?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1261.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9908	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .\nQuestion: what was the change of hqla from 12/31/16 to 12/31/17?\nAnswer: 42.7\nQuestion: what was the increase of hqla in excess of net outflows between 2016 and 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "10.8" } ]
CONVFINQA7571	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-16.9 ( 16.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1 ( 9.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 247.0</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .\nQuestion: what is the 2010 net revenue?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "272.9" } ]
CONVFINQA10312	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe fair value of our grants receivable is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using an appropriate yield curve . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of our grants receivable was classified within other current assets and other long-term assets , as applicable . our long-term debt recognized at amortized cost is comprised of our senior notes and our convertible debentures . the fair value of our senior notes is determined using active market prices , and it is therefore classified as level 1 . the fair value of our convertible long-term debt is determined using discounted cash flow models with observable market inputs , and it takes into consideration variables such as interest rate changes , comparable securities , subordination discount , and credit-rating changes , and it is therefore classified as level 2 . the nvidia corporation ( nvidia ) cross-license agreement liability in the preceding table was incurred as a result of entering into a long-term patent cross-license agreement with nvidia in january 2011 . we agreed to make payments to nvidia over six years . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of the liability arising from the agreement was classified within other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities , as applicable . the fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using our incremental borrowing rates . note 5 : cash and investments cash and investments at the end of each period were as follows : ( in millions ) dec 28 , dec 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>dec 282013</td><td>dec 292012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>available-for-sale investments</td><td>$ 18086</td><td>$ 14001</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash</td><td>854</td><td>593</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>equity method investments</td><td>1038</td><td>992</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans receivable</td><td>1072</td><td>979</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-marketable cost method investments</td><td>1270</td><td>1202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reverse repurchase agreements</td><td>800</td><td>2850</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>trading assets</td><td>8441</td><td>5685</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total cash and investments</td><td>$ 31561</td><td>$ 26302</td></tr></table> in the third quarter of 2013 , we sold our shares in clearwire corporation , which had been accounted for as available-for-sale marketable equity securities , and our interest in clearwire communications , llc ( clearwire llc ) , which had been accounted for as an equity method investment . in total , we received proceeds of $ 470 million on these transactions and recognized a gain of $ 439 million , which is included in gains ( losses ) on equity investments , net on the consolidated statements of income . proceeds received and gains recognized for each investment are included in the \"available-for-sale investments\" and \"equity method investments\" sections that follow . table of contents intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of cash and investments from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: 5259.0\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to that total in 2012, in percentage?\nAnswer: 0.19995\nQuestion: in that same year of 2013, what was the recognized gain of the proceeds from the clear wire transactions?\nAnswer: 439.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of those proceeds?\nAnswer: 470.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of these proceeds does that recognized gain represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.93404" } ]
CONVFINQA2282	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrepublic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in december 2008 , the board of directors amended and restated the republic services , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ( formerly known as the allied waste industries , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ( the 2006 plan ) ) . allied 2019s shareholders approved the 2006 plan in may 2006 . the 2006 plan was amended and restated in december 2008 to reflect republic as the new sponsor of the plan , and that any references to shares of common stock are to shares of common stock of republic , and to adjust outstanding awards and the number of shares available under the plan to reflect the allied acquisition . the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provided for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards . awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the allied acquisition . no further awards will be made under the 2006 stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for each of the periods presented ) and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $ 5.74 , $ 5.27 and $ 4.77 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>27.5% ( 27.5 % )</td><td>28.9% ( 28.9 % )</td><td>27.8% ( 27.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.5</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7.0</td><td>7.0</td><td>7.0</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the difference in weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted between 2013 and 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.47" } ]
CONVFINQA8305	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nregulatory balancing accounts accumulate differences between revenues recognized and authorized revenue requirements until they are collected from customers or are refunded . regulatory balancing accounts include low income programs and purchased power and water accounts . debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues . call premiums on the redemption of long- term debt , as well as unamortized debt expense , are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates . as a result of american water capital corp . 2019s prepayment of the 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series c senior notes due december 21 , 2018 ( 201cseries c senior notes 201d ) and 5.77% ( 5.77 % ) series d senior notes due december 21 , 2021 ( 201cseries d senior notes 201d ) and payment of a make-whole premium amount to the holders thereof of $ 34 million , the company recorded a $ 6 million charge resulting from the early extinguishment of debt at the parent company . substantially all of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the company 2019s utility subsidiaries were recorded as regulatory assets that the company believes are probable of recovery in future rates . approximately $ 1 million of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the company 2019s utility subsidiaries was amortized in 2017 . purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the company 2019s california utility subsidiary during 2002 , and acquisitions in 2007 by the company 2019s new jersey utility subsidiary . as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 . tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from two to fifteen years , as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service . other regulatory assets include certain construction costs for treatment facilities , property tax stabilization , employee-related costs , deferred other postretirement benefit expense , business services project expenses , coastal water project costs , rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others . these costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods . regulatory liabilities regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are probable of being credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process . also , if costs expected to be incurred in the future are currently being recovered through rates , the company records those expected future costs as regulatory liabilities . the following table summarizes the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income taxes recovered through rates</td><td>$ 1242</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>removal costs recovered through rates</td><td>315</td><td>316</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts</td><td>48</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>59</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total regulatory liabilities</td><td>$ 1664</td><td>$ 403</td></tr></table> income taxes recovered through rates relate to deferred taxes that will likely be refunded to the company 2019s customers . on december 22 , 2017 , the tcja was signed into law , which , among other things , enacted significant and complex changes to the internal revenue code of 1986 , including a reduction in the maximum u.s . federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) as of january 1 , 2018 . the tcja created significant .\nQuestion: what is the total total regulatory liabilities in 2017?\nAnswer: 1664.0\nQuestion: what about in 2016?\nAnswer: 403.0\nQuestion: what is the net increase?\nAnswer: 1261.0\nQuestion: what is the total total regulatory liabilities in 2016?\nAnswer: 403.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.12903" } ]
CONVFINQA9518	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nprovision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits</td><td>18</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in permanent reinvestment assertion</td><td>2014</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjustments to valuation allowances</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tax law changes</td><td>2014</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>effective income tax rate on continuing operations</td><td>74% ( 74 % )</td><td>61% ( 61 % )</td></tr></table> the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income . the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments . the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the \"corporate and other unallocated items\" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below . effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent . change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s . tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations . offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million . in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s . tax on previously undistributed earnings . adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s . benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes . discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .\nQuestion: what is the effective income tax rate on continuing operations in 2012?\nAnswer: 74.0\nQuestion: what about in 2011?\nAnswer: 61.0\nQuestion: what is the sum for these two years?\nAnswer: 135.0\nQuestion: what about the average?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "67.5" } ]
CONVFINQA6304	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 14215</td><td>$ 15794</td><td>$ 442</td><td>$ 4737</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $ 25 million scheduled to expire in november 2018 . the credit facility allows entergy new orleans to issue letters of credit against $ 10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility . in addition , entergy new orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 6.2 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy new orleans 2019s letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy new orleans obtained authorization from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 100 million at any time outstanding . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through june 2018 . state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy new orleans charges for electricity and natural gas significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy new orleans is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the city council , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . retail rates see 201calgiers asset transfer 201d below for discussion of the transfer from entergy louisiana to entergy new orleans of certain assets that serve algiers customers . in march 2013 , entergy louisiana filed a rate case for the algiers area , which is in new orleans and is regulated by the city council . entergy louisiana requested a rate increase of $ 13 million over three years , including a 10.4% ( 10.4 % ) return on common equity and a formula rate plan mechanism identical to its lpsc request . in january 2014 the city council advisors filed direct testimony recommending a rate increase of $ 5.56 million over three years , including an 8.13% ( 8.13 % ) return on common equity . in june 2014 the city council unanimously approved a settlement that includes the following : 2022 a $ 9.3 million base rate revenue increase to be phased in on a levelized basis over four years ; 2022 recovery of an additional $ 853 thousand annually through a miso recovery rider ; and 2022 the adoption of a four-year formula rate plan requiring the filing of annual evaluation reports in may of each year , commencing may 2015 , with resulting rates being implemented in october of each year . the formula rate plan includes a midpoint target authorized return on common equity of 9.95% ( 9.95 % ) with a +/- 40 basis point bandwidth . the rate increase was effective with bills rendered on and after the first billing cycle of july 2014 . additional compliance filings were made with the city council in october 2014 for approval of the form of certain rate riders , including among others , a ninemile 6 non-fuel cost recovery interim rider , allowing for contemporaneous recovery of capacity .\nQuestion: what was the total amount of the receivables from 2015 and 2016, in thousands?\nAnswer: 30009.0\nQuestion: and what was the amount of the receivables in 2014, also in thousands?\nAnswer: 442.0\nQuestion: including, then, 2014, what would be, in thousands, the total amount of the receivables for the three years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "30451.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1126	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i item 1 . business . general development of business general : altria group , inc . is a holding company incorporated in the commonwealth of virginia in 1985 . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . 2019s wholly-owned subsidiaries included philip morris usa inc . ( 201cpm usa 201d ) , which is engaged predominantly in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes in the united states ; john middleton co . ( 201cmiddleton 201d ) , which is engaged in the manufacture and sale of machine-made large cigars and pipe tobacco , and is a wholly- owned subsidiary of pm usa ; and ust llc ( 201cust 201d ) , which through its wholly-owned subsidiaries , including u.s . smokeless tobacco company llc ( 201cusstc 201d ) and ste . michelle wine estates ltd . ( 201cste . michelle 201d ) , is engaged in the manufacture and sale of smokeless tobacco products and wine . altria group , inc . 2019s other operating companies included nu mark llc ( 201cnu mark 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary that is engaged in the manufacture and sale of innovative tobacco products , and philip morris capital corporation ( 201cpmcc 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary that maintains a portfolio of finance assets , substantially all of which are leveraged leases . other altria group , inc . wholly-owned subsidiaries included altria group distribution company , which provides sales , distribution and consumer engagement services to certain altria group , inc . operating subsidiaries , and altria client services inc. , which provides various support services , such as legal , regulatory , finance , human resources and external affairs , to altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . also held approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of the economic and voting interest of sabmiller plc ( 201csabmiller 201d ) , which altria group , inc . accounts for under the equity method of accounting . source of funds : because altria group , inc . is a holding company , its access to the operating cash flows of its wholly- owned subsidiaries consists of cash received from the payment of dividends and distributions , and the payment of interest on intercompany loans by its subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . 2019s principal wholly-owned subsidiaries were not limited by long-term debt or other agreements in their ability to pay cash dividends or make other distributions with respect to their equity interests . in addition , altria group , inc . receives cash dividends on its interest in sabmiller if and when sabmiller pays such dividends . financial information about segments altria group , inc . 2019s reportable segments are smokeable products , smokeless products and wine . the financial services and the innovative tobacco products businesses are included in an all other category due to the continued reduction of the lease portfolio of pmcc and the relative financial contribution of altria group , inc . 2019s innovative tobacco products businesses to altria group , inc . 2019s consolidated results . altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker reviews operating companies income to evaluate the performance of , and allocate resources to , the segments . operating companies income for the segments is defined as operating income before amortization of intangibles and general corporate expenses . interest and other debt expense , net , and provision for income taxes are centrally managed at the corporate level and , accordingly , such items are not presented by segment since they are excluded from the measure of segment profitability reviewed by altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker . net revenues and operating companies income ( together with a reconciliation to earnings before income taxes ) attributable to each such segment for each of the last three years are set forth in note 15 . segment reporting to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data of this annual report on form 10-k ( 201citem 8 201d ) . information about total assets by segment is not disclosed because such information is not reported to or used by altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker . segment goodwill and other intangible assets , net , are disclosed in note 4 . goodwill and other intangible assets , net to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 4 201d ) . the accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in note 2 . summary of significant accounting policies to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 2 201d ) . the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment and the all other category were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>smokeable products</td><td>87.2% ( 87.2 % )</td><td>84.5% ( 84.5 % )</td><td>83.7% ( 83.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smokeless products</td><td>13.4</td><td>12.2</td><td>12.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>wine</td><td>1.7</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> for items affecting the comparability of the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment , see note 15 . segment reporting to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 15 201d ) . narrative description of business portions of the information called for by this item are included in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations - operating results by business segment of this annual report on form 10-k . tobacco space altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies include pm usa , usstc and other subsidiaries of ust , middleton and nu mark . altria group distribution company provides sales , distribution and consumer engagement services to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies . the products of altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco subsidiaries include smokeable tobacco products comprised of cigarettes manufactured and sold by pm usa and machine-made large altria_mdc_2014form10k_nolinks_crops.pdf 3 2/25/15 5:56 pm .\nQuestion: what was operating income related to smokeless products in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "13.4" } ]
CONVFINQA8224	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations . the company believes that adequate provisions have been made for income taxes for all periods through december 31 , 2010 . 12 . stock-based compensation the company recognized stock-based compensation of $ 52.6 million , $ 60.7 million and $ 54.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 included $ 6.9 million related to the modification of the vesting and exercise terms for certain employee 2019s equity awards . the company did not capitalize any stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . summary of stock-based compensation plans 2014the company maintains equity incentive plans that provide for the grant of stock-based awards to its directors , officers and employees . under the 2007 equity incentive plan ( 201c2007 plan 201d ) , which provides for the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options , as well as restricted stock units , restricted stock and other stock-based awards , exercise prices in the case of non-qualified and incentive stock options are not less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant . equity awards typically vest ratably over various periods , generally four years , and generally expire ten years from the date of grant . stock options 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , the company had the ability to grant stock-based awards with respect to an aggregate of 22.0 million shares of common stock under the 2007 plan . the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the table below . the risk-free treasury rate is based on the u.s . treasury yield in effect at the accounting measurement date . the expected life ( estimated period of time outstanding ) was estimated using the vesting term and historical exercise behavior of company employees . the expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the expected life of the stock options . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.39% ( 2.39 % )</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.04% ( 2.04 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % ) 2013 3.05% ( 3.05 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.35% ( 2.35 % )</td><td>1.71% ( 1.71 % )</td><td>1.89% ( 1.89 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4.60 years</td><td>4.00 years</td><td>4.00 years</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.11% ( 37.11 % ) 2013 37.48% ( 37.48 % )</td><td>36.00% ( 36.00 % ) 2013 36.63% ( 36.63 % )</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % ) 2013 35.30% ( 35.30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.14% ( 37.14 % )</td><td>36.23% ( 36.23 % )</td><td>29.10% ( 29.10 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant date fair value per share during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 15.03 , $ 8.90 and $ 9.55 , respectively . the intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 62.7 million , $ 40.1 million and $ 99.1 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was approximately $ 27.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $ 129.1 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company realized approximately $ 0.3 million of state tax benefits from the exercise of stock options. .\nQuestion: what was the net change of the intrinsic value of stock options from 2009 to 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22.6" } ]
CONVFINQA5855	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n1 2 4 n o t e s effective january 1 , 2011 , all u.s . employees , including u.s . legacy bgi employees , will participate in the brsp . all plan assets in the two legacy bgi plans , including the 401k plan and retirement plan ( see below ) , were merged into the brsp on january 1 , 2011 . under the combined brsp , employee contributions of up to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible compensation , as defined by the plan and subject to irc limitations , will be matched by the company at 50% ( 50 % ) . in addition , the company will continue to make an annual retirement contribution to eligible participants equal to 3-5% ( 3-5 % ) of eligible compensation . blackrock institutional trust company 401 ( k ) savings plan ( formerly the bgi 401 ( k ) savings plan ) the company assumed a 401 ( k ) plan ( the 201cbgi plan 201d ) covering employees of former bgi as a result of the bgi transaction . as part of the bgi plan , employee contributions for participants with at least one year of service were matched at 200% ( 200 % ) of participants 2019 pre-tax contributions up to 2% ( 2 % ) of base salary and overtime , and matched 100% ( 100 % ) of the next 2% ( 2 % ) of base salary and overtime , as defined by the plan and subject to irc limitations . the maximum matching contribution a participant would have received is an amount equal to 6% ( 6 % ) of base salary up to the irc limitations . the bgi plan expense was $ 12 million for the year ended december 31 , 2010 and immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . effective january 1 , 2011 , the net assets of this plan merged into the brsp . blackrock institutional trust company retirement plan ( formerly the bgi retirement plan ) the company assumed a defined contribution money purchase pension plan ( 201cbgi retirement plan 201d ) as a result of the bgi transaction . all salaried employees of former bgi and its participating affiliates who were u.s . residents on the u.s . payroll were eligible to participate . for participants earning less than $ 100000 in base salary , the company contributed 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s total compensation ( base salary , overtime and performance bonus ) up to $ 100000 . for participants earning $ 100000 or more in base salary , the company contributed 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s base salary and overtime up to the irc limita- tion of $ 245000 in 2010 . these contributions were 25% ( 25 % ) vested once the participant has completed two years of service and then vested at a rate of 25% ( 25 % ) for each additional year of service completed . employees with five or more years of service under the retirement plan were 100% ( 100 % ) vested in their entire balance . the retirement plan expense was $ 13 million for the year ended december 31 , 2010 and immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . effective january 1 , 2011 , the net assets of this plan merged into the brsp . blackrock group personal pension plan blackrock investment management ( uk ) limited ( 201cbim 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company , contributes to the blackrock group personal pension plan , a defined contribution plan for all employees of bim . bim contributes between 6% ( 6 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of each employee 2019s eligible compensation . the expense for this plan was $ 22 million , $ 13 million and $ 16 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . defined benefit plans in 2009 , prior to the bgi transaction , the company had several defined benefit pension plans in japan , germany , luxembourg and jersey . all accrued benefits under these defined benefit plans are currently frozen and the plans are closed to new participants . in 2008 , the defined benefit pension values in luxembourg were transferred into a new defined contribution plan for such employees , removing future liabilities . participant benefits under the plans will not change with salary increases or additional years of service . through the bgi transaction , the company assumed defined benefit pension plans in japan and germany which are closed to new participants . during 2010 , these plans merged into the legacy blackrock plans in japan ( the 201cjapan plan 201d ) and germany . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the plan assets for these plans were approximately $ 19 million and $ 10 million , respectively , and the unfunded obligations were less than $ 6 million and $ 3 million , respectively , which were recorded in accrued compensation and benefits on the consolidated statements of financial condition . benefit payments for the next five years and in aggregate for the five years thereafter are not expected to be material . defined benefit plan assets for the japan plan of approximately $ 16 million are invested using a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equity securities , debt securities and other investments are used to preserve asset values , diversify risk and achieve the target investment return benchmark . investment strategies and asset allocations are based on consideration of plan liabilities and the funded status of the plan . investment performance and asset allocation are measured and monitored on an ongoing basis . the current target allocations for the plan assets are 45-50% ( 45-50 % ) for u.s . and international equity securities , 50-55% ( 50-55 % ) for u.s . and international fixed income securities and 0-5% ( 0-5 % ) for cash and cash equivalents . the table below provides the fair value of the defined benefit japan plan assets at december 31 , 2010 by asset category . the table also identifies the level of inputs used to determine the fair value of assets in each category . quoted prices significant in active other markets for observable identical assets inputs december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) ( level 1 ) ( level 2 ) 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>quoted prices inactive marketsfor identical assets ( level 1 )</td><td>significant other observable inputs ( level 2 )</td><td>december 31 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity securities</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fixed income securities</td><td>2014</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of plan assets</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 3</td><td>$ 16</td></tr></table> the assets and unfunded obligation for the defined benefit pension plan in germany and jersey were immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2010 . post-retirement benefit plans prior to the bgi transaction , the company had requirements to deliver post-retirement medical benefits to a closed population based in the united kingdom and through the bgi transaction , the company assumed a post-retirement benefit plan to a closed population of former bgi employees in the united kingdom . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , expenses and unfunded obligations for these benefits were immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in addition , through the bgi transaction , the company assumed a requirement to deliver post-retirement medical benefits to a .\nQuestion: what was the value for the expense related to personal pension plans in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7016	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses , or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of many of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions . net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>211</td><td>150</td><td>94</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>e.g .</td><td>36</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other africa</td><td>1950</td><td>1502</td><td>1089</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total africa</td><td>1986</td><td>1502</td><td>1089</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other international</td><td>88</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>2285</td><td>1652</td><td>1183</td></tr></table> oil sands mining segment we hold a 20 percent non-operated interest in the aosp , an oil sands mining and upgrading joint venture located in alberta , canada . the joint venture produces bitumen from oil sands deposits in the athabasca region utilizing mining techniques and upgrades the bitumen to synthetic crude oils and vacuum gas oil . the aosp 2019s mining and extraction assets are located near fort mcmurray , alberta , and include the muskeg river and the jackpine mines . gross design capacity of the combined mines is 255000 ( 51000 net to our interest ) barrels of bitumen per day . the aosp operations use established processes to mine oil sands deposits from an open-pit mine , extract the bitumen and upgrade it into synthetic crude oils . ore is mined using traditional truck and shovel mining techniques . the mined ore passes through primary crushers to reduce the ore chunks in size and is then sent to rotary breakers where the ore chunks are further reduced to smaller particles . the particles are combined with hot water to create slurry . the slurry moves through the extraction process where it separates into sand , clay and bitumen-rich froth . a solvent is added to the bitumen froth to separate out the remaining solids , water and heavy asphaltenes . the solvent washes the sand and produces clean bitumen that is required for the upgrader to run efficiently . the process yields a mixture of solvent and bitumen which is then transported from the mine to the scotford upgrader via the approximately 300-mile corridor pipeline . the aosp's scotford upgrader is located at fort saskatchewan , northeast of edmonton , alberta . the bitumen is upgraded at scotford using both hydrotreating and hydroconversion processes to remove sulfur and break the heavy bitumen molecules into lighter products . blendstocks acquired from outside sources are utilized in the production of our saleable products . the upgrader produces synthetic crude oils and vacuum gas oil . the vacuum gas oil is sold to an affiliate of the operator under a long-term contract at market-related prices , and the other products are sold in the marketplace . as of december 31 , 2014 , we own or have rights to participate in developed and undeveloped leases totaling approximately 163000 gross ( 33000 net ) acres . the underlying developed leases are held for the duration of the project , with royalties payable to the province of alberta . synthetic crude oil sales volumes for 2014 averaged 50 mbbld and net-of-royalty production was 41 mbbld . in december 2013 , a jackpine mine expansion project received conditional approval from the canadian government . the project includes additional mining areas , associated processing facilities and infrastructure . the government conditions relate to wildlife , the environment and aboriginal health issues . we will evaluate the potential expansion project and government conditions after infrastructure reliability initiatives are completed . the governments of alberta and canada have agreed to partially fund quest ccs for $ 865 million canadian . in the third quarter of 2012 , the energy and resources conservation board ( \"ercb\" ) , alberta's primary energy regulator at that time , conditionally approved the project and the aosp partners approved proceeding to construct and operate quest ccs . government funding commenced in 2012 and continued as milestones were achieved during the development , construction and operating phases . failure of the aosp to meet certain timing , performance and operating objectives may result in repaying some of the government funding . construction and commissioning of quest ccs is expected to be completed by late 2015. .\nQuestion: by what amount did net undeveloped acres decrease from 2015 to 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "633.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6406	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index january 3 , january 2 , january 1 , december 31 , december 29 , december 28 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>january 3 2009</td><td>january 2 2010</td><td>january 1 2011</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 29 2012</td><td>december 28 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>advance auto parts</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.28</td><td>$ 195.80</td><td>$ 206.86</td><td>$ 213.14</td><td>$ 327.63</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>119.67</td><td>134.97</td><td>134.96</td><td>150.51</td><td>197.62</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p retail index</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.28</td><td>174.70</td><td>179.79</td><td>219.77</td><td>321.02</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of a $100 investment in s&p 500 index from 2009 to 2011?\nAnswer: 34.97\nQuestion: what fraction does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.3497\nQuestion: what about the return rate?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.3497" } ]
CONVFINQA2140	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsystem energy resources , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis with syndicated bank letters of credit . in december 2004 , system energy amended these letters of credit and they now expire in may 2009 . system energy may refinance or redeem debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy has obtained a short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow , through march 31 , 2010 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 200 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy's short-term borrowing limits . system energy has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long- term authorization extends through june 2009 . system energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 42915</td><td>$ 53620</td><td>$ 88231</td><td>$ 277287</td></tr></table> in may 2007 , $ 22.5 million of system energy's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans . see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . nuclear matters system energy owns and operates grand gulf . system energy is , therefore , subject to the risks related to owning and operating a nuclear plant . these include risks from the use , storage , handling and disposal of high-level and low-level radioactive materials , regulatory requirement changes , including changes resulting from events at other plants , limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available for losses in connection with nuclear operations , and technological and financial uncertainties related to decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives , including the sufficiency of funds in decommissioning trusts . in the event of an unanticipated early shutdown of grand gulf , system energy may be required to provide additional funds or credit support to satisfy regulatory requirements for decommissioning . environmental risks system energy's facilities and operations are subject to regulation by various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over air quality , water quality , control of toxic substances and hazardous and solid wastes , and other environmental matters . management believes that system energy is in substantial compliance with environmental regulations currently applicable to its facilities and operations . because environmental regulations are subject to change , future compliance costs cannot be precisely estimated . critical accounting estimates the preparation of system energy's financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to apply appropriate accounting policies and to make estimates and judgments that .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of receivables from the money pool from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: 10705.0\nQuestion: what was the 2007 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "42915.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9699	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 20 of 100 segment sales were $ 100.7 million lower in 2009 than in 2008 , primarily as a result of the impact of lower aluminum prices partially offset by an increase in sales volumes . the higher sales volumes in 2009 were the result of incremental volumes from the four plants purchased from ab inbev , partially offset by certain plant closures and lower sales volumes in the existing business . segment earnings in 2010 were $ 122.3 million higher than in 2009 primarily due to a net $ 85 million impact related to the higher sales volumes and $ 45 million of product mix and improved manufacturing performance associated with higher production . also adding to the 2010 improvement was the effect of a $ 7 million out-of-period inventory charge in 2009 . the details of the out-of-period adjustment are included in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included within item 8 of this report . segment earnings in 2009 were higher than in 2008 due to $ 12 million of earnings contribution from the four acquired plants and approximately $ 21 million of savings associated with plant closures . partially offsetting these favorable impacts were lower carbonated soft drink and beer can sales volumes ( excluding the newly acquired plants ) and approximately $ 25 million related to higher cost inventories in the first half of 2009 . metal beverage packaging , europe . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1697.6</td><td>$ 1739.5</td><td>$ 1868.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment earnings</td><td>$ 212.9</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation costs ( a )</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total segment earnings</td><td>$ 209.7</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) further details of these items are included in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . the metal beverage packaging , europe , segment includes metal beverage packaging products manufactured in europe . ball packaging europe has manufacturing plants located in germany , the united kingdom , france , the netherlands , poland and serbia , and is the second largest metal beverage container business in europe . segment sales in 2010 decreased $ 41.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange effects of $ 93 million and price and mix changes , partially offset by higher sales volumes . segment sales in 2009 as compared to 2008 were $ 129.2 million lower due to $ 110 million of unfavorable foreign exchange effects , partially offset by better commercial terms . sales volumes in 2009 were essentially flat compared to those in the prior year . segment earnings in 2010 decreased $ 1.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily the result of a $ 28 million increase related to higher sales volumes , offset by $ 18 million of negative effects from foreign currency translation and $ 12 million of higher inventory and other costs . while 2009 sales volumes were consistent with the prior year , the adverse effects of foreign currency translation , both within europe and on the conversion of the euro to the u.s . dollar , reduced segment earnings by $ 8 million . also contributing to lower segment earnings were higher cost inventory carried into 2009 and a change in sales mix , partially offset by better commercial terms in some of our contracts . on january 18 , 2011 , ball acquired aerocan s.a.s . ( aerocan ) , a leading european supplier of aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , for 20ac222.4 million ( approximately $ 300 million ) in cash and assumed debt . aerocan manufactures extruded aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , and the aluminum slugs used to make them , for customers in the personal care , pharmaceutical , beverage and food industries . it operates three aerosol can manufacturing plants 2013 one each in the czech republic , france and the united kingdom 2013 and is a 51 percent owner of a joint venture aluminum slug plant in france . the four plants employ approximately 560 people . the acquisition of aerocan will allow ball to enter a growing part of the metal packaging industry and to broaden the company 2019s market development efforts into a new customer base. .\nQuestion: what was the increase in the segment earnings in 2010, in millions?\nAnswer: 122.3\nQuestion: and what amount from this increase was due to higher sales volumes?\nAnswer: 85.0\nQuestion: what, then, would have been that increase without this amount, in millions?\nAnswer: 37.3\nQuestion: in that same year, what was the total of the net sales?\nAnswer: 1697.6\nQuestion: and what was it in the previous year, in 2009?\nAnswer: 1739.5\nQuestion: by how much, then, did it change over the period?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-41.9" } ]
CONVFINQA6278	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table provides the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>80</td></tr></table> the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company , and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the company will revert back to the company at the end of the lease , the company has recorded these as capital leases . the lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the idbs are presented by the company on a net basis . the carrying value of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 147 million and $ 150 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets . the future payments under the lease obligations are equal to and offset by the payments receivable under the idbs . as of december 31 , 2018 , the minimum annual future rental commitment under the operating leases for the portion of the facilities funded by the partners that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year included in the preceding minimum annual rental commitments are $ 4 million in 2019 through 2023 , and $ 59 million thereafter . note 20 : segment information the company 2019s operating segments are comprised of the revenue-generating components of its businesses for which separate financial information is internally produced and regularly used by management to make operating decisions and assess performance . the company operates its businesses primarily through one reportable segment , the regulated businesses segment . the company also operates market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services within non-reportable operating segments , collectively referred to as the market-based businesses . the regulated businesses segment is the largest component of the company 2019s business and includes 20 subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater services to customers in 16 states . the company 2019s primary market-based businesses include the homeowner services group , which provides warranty protection programs to residential and smaller commercial customers ; the military services group , which provides water and wastewater services to the u.s . government on military installations ; and keystone , which provides water transfer services for shale natural gas exploration and production companies. .\nQuestion: what is the total amount of the years 2019 and 2020?\nAnswer: 32.0\nQuestion: and what is the total amount of the years 2021 and 2022?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "23.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9390	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) upon termination of employment , excluding retirement , all of a participant 2019s unvested awards are forfeited . however , when a participant terminates employment due to retirement , the participant generally retains all of their awards without providing additional service to the company . eligible retirement is dependent upon age and years of service , as follows : age 55 with ten years of service , age 60 with five years of service and age 65 with two years of service . compensation expense is recognized over the shorter of the vesting periods stated in the ltip , or the date the individual becomes eligible to retire . there are 11550 shares of class a common stock reserved for equity awards under the ltip . although the ltip permits the issuance of shares of class b common stock , no such shares have been reserved for issuance . shares issued as a result of option exercises and the conversions of rsus are expected to be funded with the issuance of new shares of class a common stock . stock options the fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation and the resulting weighted- average fair value per option granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free rate of return</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>4.4% ( 4.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected term ( in years )</td><td>6.17</td><td>6.25</td><td>6.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>41.7% ( 41.7 % )</td><td>37.9% ( 37.9 % )</td><td>30.9% ( 30.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>0.4% ( 0.4 % )</td><td>0.3% ( 0.3 % )</td><td>0.6% ( 0.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted-average fair value per option granted</td><td>$ 71.03</td><td>$ 78.54</td><td>$ 41.03</td></tr></table> the risk-free rate of return was based on the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect on the date of grant . the company utilizes the simplified method for calculating the expected term of the option based on the vesting terms and the contractual life of the option . the expected volatility for options granted during 2009 was based on the average of the implied volatility of mastercard and a blend of the historical volatility of mastercard and the historical volatility of a group of companies that management believes is generally comparable to mastercard . the expected volatility for options granted during 2008 was based on the average of the implied volatility of mastercard and the historical volatility of a group of companies that management believes is generally comparable to mastercard . as the company did not have sufficient publicly traded stock data historically , the expected volatility for options granted during 2007 was primarily based on the average of the historical and implied volatility of a group of companies that management believed was generally comparable to mastercard . the expected dividend yields were based on the company 2019s expected annual dividend rate on the date of grant. .\nQuestion: what is the risk-free rate in 2009?\nAnswer: 2.5\nQuestion: what about in 2008?\nAnswer: 3.2\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: -0.7\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: -0.21875\nQuestion: what is the net change in weighted-average fair value per option granted from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: 37.51\nQuestion: what is the weighted-average fair value per option granted\tin 2007?\nAnswer: 41.03\nQuestion: what growth rate does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.91421" } ]
CONVFINQA8992	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n29 annual report 2012 duke realty corporation \| \| those indirect costs not allocated to or absorbed by these operations are charged to general and administrative expenses . we regularly review our total overhead cost structure relative to our leasing , development and construction volume and adjust the level of total overhead , generally through changes in our level of staffing in various functional departments , as necessary in order to control overall general and administrative expense . general and administrative expenses increased from $ 43.1 million in 2011 to $ 46.4 million in 2012 . the following table sets forth the factors that led to the increase in general and administrative expenses from 2011 to 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2011</td><td>$ 43.1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reduction to overall pool of overhead costs ( 1 )</td><td>-11.0 ( 11.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increased absorption of costs by wholly-owned development and leasing activities ( 2 )</td><td>-14.7 ( 14.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduced allocation of costs to service operations and rental operations ( 3 )</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2012</td><td>$ 46.4</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we reduced our total pool of overhead costs , through staff reductions and other measures , as the result of changes in our product mix and anticipated future levels of third-party construction , leasing , management and other operational activities . ( 2 ) we increased our focus on development of wholly-owned properties , and also significantly increased our leasing activity during 2012 , which resulted in an increased absorption of overhead costs . we capitalized $ 30.4 million and $ 20.0 million of our total overhead costs to leasing and development , respectively , for consolidated properties during 2012 , compared to capitalizing $ 25.3 million and $ 10.4 million of such costs , respectively , for 2011 . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs for 2012 and 2011 , respectively . ( 3 ) the reduction in the allocation of overhead costs to service operations and rental operations resulted from reduced volumes of third-party construction projects as well as due to reducing our overall investment in office properties , which are more management intensive . interest expense interest expense allocable to continuing operations increased from $ 220.5 million in 2011 to $ 245.2 million in 2012 . we had $ 47.4 million of interest expense allocated to discontinued operations in 2011 , associated with the properties that were disposed of during 2011 , compared to the allocation of only $ 3.1 million of interest expense to discontinued operations for 2012 . total interest expense , combined for continuing and discontinued operations , decreased from $ 267.8 million in 2011 to $ 248.3 million in 2012 . the reduction in total interest expense was primarily the result of a lower weighted average borrowing rate in 2012 , due to refinancing some higher rate bonds in 2011 and 2012 , as well as a slight decrease in our average level of borrowings compared to 2011 . also , due to an increase in properties under development from 2011 , which met the criteria for capitalization of interest and were financed in part by common equity issuances during 2012 , a $ 5.0 million increase in capitalized interest also contributed to the decrease in total interest expense in 2012 . acquisition-related activity during 2012 , we recognized approximately $ 4.2 million in acquisition costs , compared to $ 2.3 million of such costs in 2011 . the increase from 2011 to 2012 is the result of acquiring a higher volume of medical office properties , where a higher level of acquisition costs are incurred than other property types , in 2012 . during 2011 , we also recognized a $ 1.1 million gain related to the acquisition of a building from one of our 50%-owned unconsolidated joint ventures . discontinued operations subject to certain criteria , the results of operations for properties sold during the year to unrelated parties , or classified as held-for-sale at the end of the period , are required to be classified as discontinued operations . the property specific components of earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental revenues , rental expenses , real estate taxes , allocated interest expense and depreciation expense , as well as the net gain or loss on the disposition of properties . the operations of 150 buildings are currently classified as discontinued operations . these 150 buildings consist of 114 office , 30 industrial , four retail , and two medical office properties . as a result , we classified operating losses , before gain on sales , of $ 1.5 million , $ 1.8 million and $ 7.1 million in discontinued operations for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . of these properties , 28 were sold during 2012 , 101 properties were sold during 2011 and 19 properties were sold during 2010 . the gains on disposal of these properties of $ 13.5 million , $ 100.9 million and $ 33.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and .\nQuestion: what were the general and administrative expenses in 2012?\nAnswer: 46.4\nQuestion: and what were they in 2011?\nAnswer: 43.1\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 3.3\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2011 expenses?\nAnswer: 0.07657\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the increase in the interest expense allocable to continuing operations?\nAnswer: 24.7\nQuestion: and what is this increase as a percentage of that interest expense in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.11202" } ]
CONVFINQA2772	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nresults of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 6179</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>91</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grand gulf recovery</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2017 net revenue</td><td>$ 6318</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\nQuestion: what is the net revenue in 2017?\nAnswer: 6318.0\nQuestion: what about in 2016?\nAnswer: 6179.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 139.0\nQuestion: what growth rate does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.0225" } ]
CONVFINQA7236	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )</td><td>total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms</td><td>approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2017</td><td>515762</td><td>$ 77.15</td><td>292145</td><td>223617</td><td>$ 1.6 billion</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2017</td><td>2186889</td><td>$ 81.21</td><td>216415</td><td>1970474</td><td>$ 1.4 billion</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2017</td><td>2330263</td><td>$ 87.76</td><td>798</td><td>2329465</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5032914</td><td>$ 83.83</td><td>509358</td><td>4523556</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr></table> ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .\nQuestion: what was the share price in november 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "81.21" } ]
CONVFINQA10247	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 12 2014related party transactions in the course of settling money transfer transactions , we purchase foreign currency from consultoria internacional casa de cambio ( 201ccisa 201d ) , a mexican company partially owned by certain of our employees . as of march 31 , 2008 , mr . ra fal lim f3n cortes , a 10% ( 10 % ) shareholder of cisa , was no longer an employee , and we no longer considered cisa a related party . we purchased 6.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 560.3 million during the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 and 8.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 736.0 million during fiscal 2007 from cisa . we believe these currency transactions were executed at prevailing market exchange rates . also from time to time , money transfer transactions are settled at destination facilities owned by cisa . we incurred related settlement expenses , included in cost of service in the accompanying consolidated statements of income of $ 0.5 million in the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 . in fiscal 2007 and 2006 , we incurred related settlement expenses , included in cost of service in the accompanying consolidated statements of income of $ 0.7 and $ 0.6 million , respectively . in the normal course of business , we periodically utilize the services of contractors to provide software development services . one of our employees , hired in april 2005 , is also an employee , officer , and part owner of a firm that provides such services . the services provided by this firm primarily relate to software development in connection with our planned next generation front-end processing system in the united states . during fiscal 2008 , we capitalized fees paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million . as of may 31 , 2008 and 2007 , capitalized amounts paid to this firm of $ 4.9 million and $ 4.6 million , respectively , were included in property and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . in addition , we expensed amounts paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million , $ 0.1 million and $ 0.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . note 13 2014commitments and contingencies leases we conduct a major part of our operations using leased facilities and equipment . many of these leases have renewal and purchase options and provide that we pay the cost of property taxes , insurance and maintenance . rent expense on all operating leases for fiscal 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 30.4 million , $ 27.1 million , and $ 24.4 million , respectively . future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases at may 31 , 2008 were as follows : operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 22883</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>16359</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>11746</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>5277</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>3365</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>7816</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 67446</td></tr></table> we are party to a number of other claims and lawsuits incidental to our business . in the opinion of management , the reasonably possible outcome of such matters , individually or in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position , liquidity or results of operations. .\nQuestion: what was the number of mexican pesos purchased during fiscal 2007, converted to the thousands place?\nAnswer: -991.9\nQuestion: and the dollar value of this purchase?\nAnswer: 736.0\nQuestion: so what was the exchange rate from pesos to dollars?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-1.34769" } ]
CONVFINQA6329	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 11 2014executive compensation we incorporate by reference in this item 11 the information relating to executive and director compensation contained under the headings 201cother information about the board and its committees , 201d 201ccompensation and other benefits 201d and 201creport of the compensation committee 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2013 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on november 20 , 2013 . item 12 2014security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters we incorporate by reference in this item 12 the information relating to ownership of our common stock by certain persons contained under the headings 201ccommon stock ownership of management 201d and 201ccommon stock ownership by certain other persons 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2013 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on november 20 , 2013 . the following table provides certain information as of may 31 , 2013 concerning the shares of the company 2019s common stock that may be issued under existing equity compensation plans . for more information on these plans , see note 11 to notes to consolidated financial statements . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders : 1765510 $ 34.92 7927210 ( 1 ) equity compensation plans not approved by security holders : 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted-average exerciseprice of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )</td><td>number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders:</td><td>1765510</td><td>$ 34.92</td><td>7927210</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1765510</td><td>$ 34.92</td><td>7927210</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) also includes shares of common stock available for issuance other than upon the exercise of an option , warrant or right under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan , amended and restated 2000 non- employee director stock option plan , global payments employee stock purchase plan and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan . item 13 2014certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence we incorporate by reference in this item 13 the information regarding certain relationships and related transactions between us and some of our affiliates and the independence of our board of directors contained under the headings 201ccertain relationships and related transactions 201d and 201cother information about the board and its committees 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2013 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on november 20 , 2013 . item 14 2014principal accounting fees and services we incorporate by reference in this item 14 the information regarding principal accounting fees and services contained under the section ratification of the reappointment of auditors from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2013 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on november 20 , 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7927210.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3514	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>155.99</td><td>215.10</td><td>270.83</td><td>350.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.32</td><td>164.84</td><td>167.06</td><td>187.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>151.58</td><td>198.02</td><td>174.88</td><td>201.26</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .\nQuestion: what was the performance price of the cadence design system in 2010?\nAnswer: 155.99\nQuestion: and what was the change in that price since 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "55.99" } ]
CONVFINQA2712	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following table presents average u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances for the years ended december 31 : years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td><td>$ 1994</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td><td>1585</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td><td>$ 3579</td></tr></table> although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2013 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2012 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.38 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 109.25 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 98.39 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . this increase was mainly due to higher levels of non-u.s . transaction accounts associated with the growth of new and existing business in assets under custody and administration . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings declined to $ 3.79 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 4.68 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , as higher levels of client deposits provided additional liquidity . average long-term debt increased to $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.01 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of extendible notes by state street bank in december 2012 , the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , and the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of senior debt in november 2013 . this increase was partly offset by maturities of $ 1.75 billion of senior debt in the second quarter of 2012 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 5.90 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay- downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to dictate what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the average total short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: 384.0\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to those advances in 2012?\nAnswer: 0.11412\nQuestion: and from 2011 to 2012, what was the change in these advances?\nAnswer: -214.0\nQuestion: what is this change as a portion of those average total short-duration advances in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.05979" } ]
CONVFINQA4112	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued uncertain tax positions : the company is subject to income tax in certain jurisdictions outside the u.s. , principally canada and mexico . the statute of limitations on assessment of tax varies from three to seven years depending on the jurisdiction and tax issue . tax returns filed in each jurisdiction are subject to examination by local tax authorities . the company is currently under audit by the canadian revenue agency , mexican tax authority and the u.s . internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) . in october 2011 , the irs issued a notice of proposed adjustment , which proposes pursuant to section 482 of the code , to disallow a capital loss claimed by krs on the disposition of common shares of valad property ltd. , an australian publicly listed company . because the adjustment is being made pursuant to section 482 of the code , the irs believes it can assert a 100 percent 201cpenalty 201d tax pursuant to section 857 ( b ) ( 7 ) of the code and disallow the capital loss deduction . the notice of proposed adjustment indicates the irs 2019 intention to impose the 100 percent 201cpenalty 201d tax on the company in the amount of $ 40.9 million and disallowing the capital loss claimed by krs . the company and its outside counsel have considered the irs 2019 assessment and believe that there is sufficient documentation establishing a valid business purpose for the transfer , including recent case history showing support for similar positions . accordingly , the company strongly disagrees with the irs 2019 position on the application of section 482 of the code to the disposition of the shares , the imposition of the 100 percent penalty tax and the simultaneous assertion of the penalty tax and disallowance of the capital loss deduction . the company received a notice of proposed assessment and filed a written protest and requested an irs appeals office conference . an appeals hearing was attended by management and its attorneys , the irs compliance group and an irs appeals officer in november , 2014 , at which time irs compliance presented arguments in support of their position , as noted herein . management and its attorneys presented rebuttal arguments in support of its position . the matter is currently under consideration by the appeals officer . the company intends to vigorously defend its position in this matter and believes it will prevail . resolutions of these audits are not expected to have a material effect on the company 2019s financial statements . during 2013 , the company early adopted asu 2013-11 prospectively and reclassified a portion of its reserve for uncertain tax positions . the reserve for uncertain tax positions included amounts related to the company 2019s canadian operations . the company has unrecognized tax benefits reported as deferred tax assets and are available to settle adjustments made with respect to the company 2019s uncertain tax positions in canada . the company reduced its reserve for uncertain tax positions by $ 12.3 million associated with its canadian operations and reduced its deferred tax assets in accordance with asu 2013-11 . the company does not believe that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2014 , will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months . as of december 31 , 2014 , the company 2019s canadian uncertain tax positions , which reduce its deferred tax assets , aggregated $ 10.4 million . the liability for uncertain tax benefits principally consists of estimated foreign , federal and state income tax liabilities in years for which the statute of limitations is open . open years range from 2008 through 2014 and vary by jurisdiction and issue . the aggregate changes in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 were as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>201 4</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 4590</td><td>$ 16890</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases for tax positions related to current year</td><td>59</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduction due to adoption of asu 2013-11 ( a )</td><td>-</td><td>-12315 ( 12315 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 4649</td><td>$ 4590</td></tr></table> ( a ) this amount was reclassified against the related deferred tax asset relating to the company 2019s early adoption of asu 2013-11 as discussed above. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the balance at the beginning of the years of 2013 and 2014?\nAnswer: 21480.0\nQuestion: what is the sum at the end of 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4649.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9653	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 4036</td><td>$ 4347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>-1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>643</td><td>987</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>8</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td><td>.73% ( .73 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.84</td><td>2.17</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td><td>$ -359 ( 359 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td><td>-930 ( 930 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>$ -1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td><td>.35% ( .35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>1.07</td><td>1.24</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what is the provision for credit losses in 2013?\nAnswer: 643.0\nQuestion: what about in 2012?\nAnswer: 987.0\nQuestion: what is the change in provision for credit losses?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-344.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8001	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nproducts and software , as well as ongoing investment in next-generation technologies , partially offset by savings from cost-reduction initiatives . reorganization of business charges increased due to employee severance costs and expenses related to the exit of a facility . sg&a expenses decreased , primarily due to lower marketing expenses and savings from cost-reduction initiatives , partially offset by increased expenditures on information technology upgrades . as a percentage of net sales in 2007 as compared to 2006 , gross margin and operating margin decreased , and sg&a expenses and r&d expenditures increased . the segment 2019s backlog was $ 647 million at december 31 , 2007 , compared to $ 1.4 billion at december 31 , 2006 . this decrease in backlog was primarily due to a decline in customer demand driven by the segment 2019s limited product portfolio . the segment shipped 159.1 million units in 2007 , a 27% ( 27 % ) decrease compared to shipments of 217.4 million units in 2006 . the overall decrease reflects decreased unit shipments of products for all technologies . for the full year 2007 , unit shipments : ( i ) decreased substantially in asia and emea , ( ii ) decreased in north america , and ( iii ) increased in latin america . although unit shipments by the segment decreased in 2007 , total unit shipments in the worldwide handset market increased by approximately 16% ( 16 % ) . the segment estimates its worldwide market share was approximately 14% ( 14 % ) for the full year 2007 , a decrease of approximately 8 percentage points versus full year 2006 . in 2007 , asp decreased approximately 9% ( 9 % ) compared to 2006 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the product-tier and geographic mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 and 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 . the segment has several large customers located throughout the world . in 2007 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 42% ( 42 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sells products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which account for approximately 33% ( 33 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 54% ( 54 % ) of our segment 2019s 2007 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were brazil , china and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol video and broadcast network interactive set-tops , end-to-end video delivery systems , broadband access infrastructure platforms , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201cnetwork business 201d ) . in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 33% ( 33 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 2008 20142007 2007 20142006 years ended december 31 percent change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 2008</td><td>years ended december 31 2007</td><td>years ended december 31 2006</td><td>years ended december 31 2008 20142007</td><td>2007 20142006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment net sales</td><td>$ 10086</td><td>$ 10014</td><td>$ 9164</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating earnings</td><td>918</td><td>709</td><td>787</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> segment results 20142008 compared to 2007 in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 1% ( 1 % ) to $ 10.1 billion , compared to $ 10.0 billion in 2007 . the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales primarily reflects a 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by an 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business . the 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business is primarily driven by a 17% ( 17 % ) increase in net sales of digital entertainment devices , reflecting a 19% ( 19 % ) increase in unit shipments to 18.0 million units , partially offset by lower asp due to product mix shift and pricing pressure . the 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business was primarily driven by : ( i ) the absence of net sales by the embedded communication computing group ( 201cecc 201d ) that was divested at the end of 2007 , and ( ii ) lower net sales of iden , gsm and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of umts infrastructure equipment . on a geographic basis , the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales was primarily driven by higher net sales in latin america and asia , partially offset by lower net sales in north america . the increase in net sales in latin america was 63management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations %%transmsg* transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 066000000 *%%pcmsg\|63 \|00024\|yes\|no\|02/24/2009 12:31\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n\| .\nQuestion: what was the average segment sales in 2008?\nAnswer: 10086.0\nQuestion: what was the average segment sales in 2007?\nAnswer: 10014.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 20100.0\nQuestion: what was the average segment sales in 2006?\nAnswer: 10086.0\nQuestion: what now is the sum?\nAnswer: 30186.0\nQuestion: what is the average per year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "10062.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9430	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmillion excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .\nQuestion: what were asian industrial net packaging sales in 2013?\nAnswer: 400.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "400.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8907	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 30 of 94 are included in capital spending amounts . another example is the company 2019s decision in 2007 to contribute an additional $ 44.5 million ( $ 27.3 million ) to its pension plans as part of its overall debt reduction plan . based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash flows from operating activities</td><td>$ 673.0</td><td>$ 401.4</td><td>$ 558.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>incremental pension funding net of tax</td><td>27.3</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital spending</td><td>-308.5 ( 308.5 )</td><td>-279.6 ( 279.6 )</td><td>-291.7 ( 291.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>proceeds for replacement of fire-damaged assets</td><td>48.6</td><td>61.3</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 440.4</td><td>$ 183.1</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> based on information currently available , we estimate cash flows from operating activities for 2008 to be approximately $ 650 million , capital spending to be approximately $ 350 million and free cash flow to be in the $ 300 million range . capital spending of $ 259.9 million ( net of $ 48.6 million in insurance recoveries ) in 2007 was below depreciation and amortization expense of $ 281 million . we continue to invest capital in our best performing operations , including projects to increase custom can capabilities , improve beverage can and end making productivity and add more beverage can capacity in europe , as well as expenditures in the aerospace and technologies segment . of the $ 350 million of planned capital spending for 2008 , approximately $ 180 million will be spent on top-line sales growth projects . debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2007 , decreased $ 93.1 million to $ 2358.6 million from $ 2451.7 million at december 31 , 2006 . the 2007 debt decrease from 2006 was primarily attributed to debt payments offset by higher foreign exchange rates . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 705 million was available under the company 2019s multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company also had $ 345 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of the year , of which $ 49.7 million was outstanding . on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities and during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due august 2006 primarily through the drawdown of funds under the new credit facilities . the refinancing and redemption resulted in a pretax debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) to reflect the call premium associated with the senior notes and the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs . the company has a receivables sales agreement that provides for the ongoing , revolving sale of a designated pool of trade accounts receivable of ball 2019s north american packaging operations , up to $ 250 million . the agreement qualifies as off-balance sheet financing under the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards ( sfas ) no . 140 , as amended by sfas no . 156 . net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled $ 170 million and $ 201.3 million at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 7 and 13 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .\nQuestion: what is the capital spending amount in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "308.5" } ]
CONVFINQA7393	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 93% ( 93 % ) and 89% ( 89 % ) as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ -26.3 ( 26.3 )</td><td>$ 26.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>-33.7 ( 33.7 )</td><td>34.7</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 . we had $ 1100.6 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2016 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2016 and 2015 , we had interest income of $ 20.1 and $ 22.8 , respectively . based on our 2016 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 11.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2016 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most impacted our results during 2016 included the british pound sterling and , to a lesser extent , the argentine peso , brazilian real and japanese yen . based on 2016 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2016 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures . we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .\nQuestion: what wast the value of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31, 2016?\nAnswer: 1100.6\nQuestion: what was 2015 interest income?\nAnswer: 22.8\nQuestion: what is the value of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities less the interest income?\nAnswer: 1077.8\nQuestion: what wast the value of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31, 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1100.6" } ]
CONVFINQA6883	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nd u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 2 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements the company recognizes income on long-term construction contracts where the company serves as a general contractor on the percentage of completion method . using this method , profits are recorded on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion of individual contracts , commencing when progress reaches a point where experience is sufficient to estimate final results with reasonable accuracy . that portion of the estimated earnings is accrued on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion based on contract expenditures incurred and work performed . property sales gains from sales of depreciated property are recognized in accordance with statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 66 , and are included in earnings from sales of land and depreciable property dispositions , net of impairment adjustment , in the statement of operations if identified as held for sale prior to adoption of sfas 144 and in discontinued operations if identified as held for sale after adoption of sfas 144 . gains or losses from the sale of property which is considered held for sale in dclp are recognized in accordance with sfas 66 and are included in construction management and development activity income in the statement of operations . net income per common share basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available for common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period . diluted net income per share is computed by dividing the sum of net income available for common shares and minority interest in earnings of unitholders , by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares and units outstanding and dilutive potential common shares for the period . the following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income per share ( in thousands ) : the series d convertible preferred stock and the series g convertible preferred limited partner units were anti-dilutive for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 ; therefore , no conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . in september 2002 , the company redeemed the series g convertible preferred units at their par value of $ 35.0 million . a joint venture partner in one of the company 2019s unconsolidated companies has the option to convert a portion of its ownership to company common shares ( see discussion in investments in unconsolidated companies section ) . the effect of the option on earnings per share was dilutive for the year ended december 31 , 2001 ; therefore , conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . federal income taxes the company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ( 201creit 201d ) under the internal revenue code . to qualify as a reit , the company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements , including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of its taxable income to its stockholders . management intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain the company 2019s reit status . as a reit , the company is entitled to a tax deduction for some or all of the dividends it pays to its shareholders . accordingly , the company generally will not be subject to federal income taxes as long as it distributes an amount equal to or in excess of its taxable income currently to its stockholders . a reit generally is subject to federal income taxes on any taxable income that is not currently distributed to its shareholders . if the company fails to qualify as a reit in any taxable year , it will be subject to federal income taxes and may not be able to qualify as a reit for four subsequent taxable years . reit qualification reduces , but does not eliminate , the amount of state and local taxes paid by the company . in addition , the company 2019s financial statements include the operations of taxable corporate subsidiaries that are not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and are subject to corporate federal , state and local income taxes . as a reit , the company may also be subject to certain federal excise taxes if it engages in certain types of transactions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>basic net income available for common shares</td><td>$ 161272</td><td>$ 229967</td><td>$ 212958</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership net income</td><td>2014</td><td>3423</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>minority interest in earnings of common unitholders</td><td>18568</td><td>32463</td><td>32071</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted net income available for common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>$ 179840</td><td>$ 265853</td><td>$ 245029</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average number of common shares outstanding</td><td>133981</td><td>129660</td><td>126836</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average partnership units outstanding</td><td>15442</td><td>18301</td><td>19070</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership common share equivalents</td><td>2014</td><td>2092</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>dilutive shares for stock-based compensation plans</td><td>1416</td><td>1657</td><td>1535</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>150839</td><td>151710</td><td>147441</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net income available for common shares in 2002?\nAnswer: 161272.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2001?\nAnswer: 229967.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total net income available in both years combined?\nAnswer: 391239.0\nQuestion: including 2000, what becomes this total?\nAnswer: 604197.0\nQuestion: and what is the average between those three years?\nAnswer: 201399.0\nQuestion: and in the middle year of the three, what was the weighted average number of common shares outstanding?\nAnswer: 129660.0\nQuestion: how much does this number represent in relation to the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares of that year of 2001?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.85466" } ]
CONVFINQA7157	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhigher in the first half of the year , but declined dur- ing the second half of the year reflecting the pass- through to customers of lower resin input costs . however , average margins benefitted from a more favorable mix of products sold . raw material costs were lower , primarily for resins . freight costs were also favorable , while operating costs increased . shorewood sales volumes in 2009 declined from 2008 levels reflecting weaker demand in the home entertainment segment and a decrease in tobacco segment orders as customers have shifted pro- duction outside of the united states , partially offset by higher shipments in the consumer products segment . average sales margins improved reflecting a more favorable mix of products sold . raw material costs were higher , but were partially offset by lower freight costs . operating costs were favorable , reflect- ing benefits from business reorganization and cost reduction actions taken in 2008 and 2009 . charges to restructure operations totaled $ 7 million in 2009 and $ 30 million in 2008 . entering 2010 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to increase , while average sales price real- izations should be comparable to 2009 fourth-quarter levels . raw material costs are expected to be sig- nificantly higher for wood , energy and chemicals , but planned maintenance downtime costs will decrease . foodservice sales volumes are expected to remain about flat , but average sales price realizations should improve slightly . input costs for resins should be higher , but will be partially offset by lower costs for bleached board . shorewood sales volumes are expected to decline reflecting seasonal decreases in home entertainment segment shipments . operating costs are expected to be favorable reflecting the benefits of business reorganization efforts . european consumer packaging net sales in 2009 were $ 315 million compared with $ 300 million in 2008 and $ 280 million in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 of $ 66 million increased from $ 22 million in 2008 and $ 30 million in 2007 . sales volumes in 2009 were higher than in 2008 reflecting increased ship- ments to export markets . average sales margins declined due to increased shipments to lower- margin export markets and lower average sales prices in western europe . entering 2010 , sales volumes for the first quarter are expected to remain strong . average margins should improve reflecting increased sales price realizations and a more favorable geographic mix of products sold . input costs are expected to be higher due to increased wood prices in poland and annual energy tariff increases in russia . asian consumer packaging net sales were $ 545 million in 2009 compared with $ 390 million in 2008 and $ 330 million in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 24 million compared with a loss of $ 13 million in 2008 and earnings of $ 12 million in 2007 . the improved operating earnings in 2009 reflect increased sales volumes , higher average sales mar- gins and lower input costs , primarily for chemicals . the loss in 2008 was primarily due to a $ 12 million charge to revalue pulp inventories at our shandong international paper and sun coated paperboard co. , ltd . joint venture and start-up costs associated with the joint venture 2019s new folding box board paper machine . distribution xpedx , our distribution business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to cus- tomers in many business segments . customer demand is generally sensitive to changes in general economic conditions , although the commercial printing segment is also dependent on consumer advertising and promotional spending . distribution 2019s margins are relatively stable across an economic cycle . providing customers with the best choice and value in both products and supply chain services is a key competitive factor . additionally , efficient customer service , cost-effective logistics and focused working capital management are key factors in this segment 2019s profitability . distribution in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6525</td><td>$ 7970</td><td>$ 7320</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>50</td><td>103</td><td>108</td></tr></table> distribution 2019s 2009 annual sales decreased 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 and 11% ( 11 % ) from 2007 while operating profits in 2009 decreased 51% ( 51 % ) compared with 2008 and 54% ( 54 % ) compared with 2007 . annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment totaled $ 4.1 billion in 2009 compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2008 and $ 4.7 billion in 2007 , reflecting weak economic conditions in 2009 . trade margins as a percent of sales for printing papers increased from 2008 but decreased from 2007 due to a higher mix of lower margin direct ship- ments from manufacturers . revenue from packaging products was $ 1.3 billion in 2009 compared with $ 1.7 billion in 2008 and $ 1.5 billion in 2007 . trade margins as a percent of sales for packaging products were higher than in the past two years reflecting an improved product and service mix . facility supplies annual revenue was $ 1.1 billion in 2009 , essentially .\nQuestion: what is the annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5.2" } ]
CONVFINQA3134	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncash flows from operations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal year 2018</td><td>fiscal year 2017</td><td>fiscal year 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrollinginterests</td><td>$ 2163.0</td><td>$ 1701.1</td><td>$ 1736.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>618.8</td><td>603.6</td><td>608.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>after-taxearnings from joint ventures</td><td>-84.7 ( 84.7 )</td><td>-85.0 ( 85.0 )</td><td>-88.4 ( 88.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>distributions of earnings from joint ventures</td><td>113.2</td><td>75.6</td><td>75.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock-based compensation</td><td>77.0</td><td>95.7</td><td>89.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-504.3 ( 504.3 )</td><td>183.9</td><td>120.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit plan contributions</td><td>-31.8 ( 31.8 )</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>-47.8 ( 47.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit plan costs</td><td>4.6</td><td>35.7</td><td>118.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>divestitures loss ( gain )</td><td>-</td><td>13.5</td><td>-148.2 ( 148.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>restructuring impairment and other exit costs</td><td>126.0</td><td>117.0</td><td>107.2</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>changes in current assets and liabilities excluding the effects of acquisitions anddivestitures</td><td>542.1</td><td>-194.2 ( 194.2 )</td><td>298.5</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>other net</td><td>-182.9 ( 182.9 )</td><td>-86.3 ( 86.3 )</td><td>-105.6 ( 105.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2841.0</td><td>$ 2415.2</td><td>$ 2764.2</td></tr></table> in fiscal 2018 , cash provided by operations was $ 2.8 billion compared to $ 2.4 billion in fiscal 2017 . the $ 426 million increase was primarily driven by the $ 462 million increase in net earnings and the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities , partially offset by a $ 688 million change in deferred income taxes . the change in deferred income taxes was primarily related to the $ 638 million provisional benefit from revaluing our net u.s . deferred tax liabilities to reflect the new u.s . corporate tax rate as a result of the tcja . the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in accounts payable of $ 476 million related to the extension of payment terms and timing of payments , and $ 264 million of changes in other current liabilities primarily driven by changes in income taxes payable , trade and advertising accruals , and incentive accruals . we strive to grow core working capital at or below the rate of growth in our net sales . for fiscal 2018 , core working capital decreased 27 percent , compared to a net sales increase of 1 percent . in fiscal 2017 , core working capital increased 9 percent , compared to a net sales decline of 6 percent , and in fiscal 2016 , core working capital decreased 41 percent , compared to net sales decline of 6 percent . in fiscal 2017 , our operations generated $ 2.4 billion of cash , compared to $ 2.8 billion in fiscal 2016 . the $ 349 million decrease was primarily driven by a $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities . the $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in other current liabilities driven by changes in income taxes payable , a decrease in incentive accruals , and changes in trade and advertising accruals due to reduced spending . the change in current assets and liabilities was also impacted by the timing of accounts payable . additionally , we recorded a $ 14 million loss on a divestiture during fiscal 2017 , compared to a $ 148 million net gain on divestitures during fiscal 2016 , and classified the related cash flows as investing activities. .\nQuestion: what was the change in net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and non-controlling interests between 2017 and 2018?\nAnswer: 461.9\nQuestion: and the percentage change of this value?\nAnswer: 0.27153\nQuestion: what was the change in the cash provided by operations from 2017 to 2018?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.4" } ]
CONVFINQA6555	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmill in the fourth quarter of 2008 . this compares with 635000 tons of total downtime in 2008 of which 305000 tons were lack-of-order downtime . printing papers in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 5680</td><td>$ 6810</td><td>$ 6530</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1091</td><td>474</td><td>839</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales in 2009 were $ 2.8 billion compared with $ 3.4 billion in 2008 and $ 3.5 billion in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 746 million ( $ 307 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with $ 405 million ( $ 435 million excluding shutdown costs for a paper machine ) in 2008 and $ 415 million in 2007 . sales volumes decreased sig- nificantly in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weak customer demand and reduced production capacity resulting from the shutdown of a paper machine at the franklin mill in december 2008 and the conversion of the bastrop mill to pulp production in june 2008 . average sales price realizations were lower reflecting slight declines for uncoated freesheet paper in domestic markets and significant declines in export markets . margins were also unfavorably affected by a higher proportion of shipments to lower-margin export markets . input costs , however , were favorable due to lower wood and chemical costs and sig- nificantly lower energy costs . freight costs were also lower . planned maintenance downtime costs in 2009 were comparable with 2008 . operating costs were favorable , reflecting cost control efforts and strong machine performance . lack-of-order downtime increased to 525000 tons in 2009 , including 120000 tons related to the shutdown of a paper machine at our franklin mill in the 2008 fourth quarter , from 135000 tons in 2008 . operating earnings in 2009 included $ 671 million of alternative fuel mixture cred- its , $ 223 million of costs associated with the shutdown of our franklin mill and $ 9 million of other shutdown costs , while operating earnings in 2008 included $ 30 million of costs for the shutdown of a paper machine at our franklin mill . looking ahead to 2010 , first-quarter sales volumes are expected to increase slightly from fourth-quarter 2009 levels . average sales price realizations should be higher , reflecting the full-quarter impact of sales price increases announced in the fourth quarter for converting and envelope grades of uncoated free- sheet paper and an increase in prices to export markets . however , input costs for wood , energy and chemicals are expected to continue to increase . planned maintenance downtime costs should be lower and operating costs should be favorable . brazil ian papers net sales for 2009 of $ 960 mil- lion increased from $ 950 million in 2008 and $ 850 million in 2007 . operating profits for 2009 were $ 112 million compared with $ 186 million in 2008 and $ 174 million in 2007 . sales volumes increased in 2009 compared with 2008 for both paper and pulp reflect- ing higher export shipments . average sales price realizations were lower due to strong competitive pressures in the brazilian domestic market in the second half of the year , lower export prices and unfavorable foreign exchange rates . margins were unfavorably affected by a higher proportion of lower margin export sales . input costs for wood and chem- icals were favorable , but these benefits were partially offset by higher energy costs . planned maintenance downtime costs were lower , and operating costs were also favorable . earnings in 2009 were adversely impacted by unfavorable foreign exchange effects . entering 2010 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower compared with the fourth quarter of 2009 . profit margins are expected to be slightly higher reflecting a more favorable geographic sales mix and improving sales price realizations in export markets , partially offset by higher planned main- tenance outage costs . european papers net sales in 2009 were $ 1.3 bil- lion compared with $ 1.7 billion in 2008 and $ 1.5 bil- lion in 2007 . operating profits in 2009 of $ 92 million ( $ 115 million excluding expenses associated with the closure of the inverurie mill ) compared with $ 39 mil- lion ( $ 146 million excluding a charge to reduce the carrying value of the fixed assets at the inverurie , scotland mill to their estimated realizable value ) in 2008 and $ 171 million in 2007 . sales volumes in 2009 were lower than in 2008 primarily due to reduced sales of uncoated freesheet paper following the closure of the inverurie mill in 2009 . average sales price realizations decreased significantly in 2009 across most of western europe , but margins increased in poland and russia reflecting the effect of local currency devaluations . input costs were favorable as lower wood costs , particularly in russia , were only partially offset by higher energy costs in poland and higher chemical costs . planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher in 2009 than in 2008 , while manufacturing operating costs were lower . operating profits in 2009 also reflect favorable foreign exchange impacts . looking ahead to 2010 , sales volumes are expected to decline from strong 2009 fourth-quarter levels despite solid customer demand . average sales price realizations are expected to increase over the quar- ter , primarily in eastern europe , as price increases .\nQuestion: what is the net change of sales and profit in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6336.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9686	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had $ 295.4 million and $ 295.0 million net , respectively ( $ 300.0 million aggregate principal amount ) outstanding under the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the carrying value includes a discount of $ 4.6 million and $ 5.0 million , respectively . 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes 2014the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes due 2010 ( 201c5.0% ( 201c5.0 % ) notes 201d ) matured on february 15 , 2010 , and interest was payable semiannually on february 15 and august 15 of each year . the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes were convertible at any time into shares of the company 2019s class a common stock ( 201ccommon stock 201d ) at a conversion price of $ 51.50 per share , subject to adjustment in certain cases . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had none and $ 59.7 million outstanding , respectively , under the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes . ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes 2014the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were issued with a maturity of december 1 , 2011 and interest was payable semi-annually in arrears on june 1 and december 1 of each year . the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by the company and substantially all of the wholly owned domestic restricted subsidiaries of ati and the company , other than spectrasite and its subsidiaries . the notes ranked junior in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of ati , the sister guarantors ( as defined in the indenture relating to the notes ) and their domestic restricted subsidiaries . the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were structurally senior in right of payment to all other existing and future indebtedness of the company , including the company 2019s senior notes , convertible notes and the revolving credit facility and term loan . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , ati issued a notice for the redemption of the principal amount of its outstanding ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . in accordance with the redemption provisions and the indenture for the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes , the notes were redeemed at a price equal to 100.00% ( 100.00 % ) of the principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest up to , but excluding , september 23 , 2010 , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 0.3 million . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had none and $ 0.3 million , respectively , outstanding under the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . capital lease obligations and notes payable 2014the company 2019s capital lease obligations and notes payable approximated $ 46.3 million and $ 59.0 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . these obligations bear interest at rates ranging from 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) to 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) and mature in periods ranging from less than one year to approximately seventy years . maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , aggregate carrying value of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 74896</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>625884</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>618</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>1750479</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>600489</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2541858</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total cash obligations</td><td>5594224</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unamortized discounts and premiums net</td><td>-6836 ( 6836 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance as of december 31 2010</td><td>$ 5587388</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in the balance of capital lease obligations and notes payable between 2009 and 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-12.7" } ]
CONVFINQA6644	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbusiness subsequent to the acquisition . the liabilities for these payments are classified as level 3 liabilities because the related fair value measurement , which is determined using an income approach , includes significant inputs not observable in the market . financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value our debt is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets at cost . based on market conditions as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the fair value of our credit agreement borrowings reasonably approximated the carrying values of $ 1.7 billion and $ 2.0 billion , respectively . in addition , based on market conditions , the fair values of the outstanding borrowings under the receivables facility reasonably approximated the carrying values of $ 110 million and $ 100 million at december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , the fair values of the u.s . notes ( 2023 ) were approximately $ 574 million and $ 615 million , respectively , compared to a carrying value of $ 600 million at each date . as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , the fair values of the euro notes ( 2024 ) were approximately $ 586 million and $ 658 million compared to carrying values of $ 573 million and $ 600 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the fair value of the euro notes ( 2026/28 ) approximated the carrying value of $ 1.1 billion . the fair value measurements of the borrowings under our credit agreement and receivables facility are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy since they are determined based upon significant inputs observable in the market , including interest rates on recent financing transactions with similar terms and maturities . we estimated the fair value by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require at december 31 , 2018 to assume these obligations . the fair value of our u.s . notes ( 2023 ) is classified as level 1 within the fair value hierarchy since it is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in an active market . the fair values of our euro notes ( 2024 ) and euro notes ( 2026/28 ) are determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in markets that are not active , and therefore are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy . note 13 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2018 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 294269</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>256172</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>210632</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>158763</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>131518</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>777165</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1828519</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 300 million , $ 247 million , and $ 212 million during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2018 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 76 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies we have certain contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in rental expense between 2016 and 2017?\nAnswer: 35.0\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.16509" } ]
CONVFINQA3494	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2005 through december 31 , 2010 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 12.66 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . performance graph 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2005 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>masco</td><td>$ 101.79</td><td>$ 76.74</td><td>$ 42.81</td><td>$ 54.89</td><td>$ 51.51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 115.61</td><td>$ 121.95</td><td>$ 77.38</td><td>$ 97.44</td><td>$ 111.89</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p industrials index</td><td>$ 113.16</td><td>$ 126.72</td><td>$ 76.79</td><td>$ 92.30</td><td>$ 116.64</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p consumer durables & apparel index</td><td>$ 106.16</td><td>$ 84.50</td><td>$ 56.13</td><td>$ 76.51</td><td>$ 99.87</td></tr></table> in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , we repurchased and retired three million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . we did not purchase any shares during the three months ended december 31 , 2010. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the performance price of the masco common stock in the five year period ended 2010?\nAnswer: -48.49\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of that price in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.4849" } ]
CONVFINQA6941	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nto determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the specified vesting period . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , options for 10204000 and 12759000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 89.46 and $ 90.86 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was $ 90 million , $ 86 million and $ 37 million , respectively . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was approximately $ 215 million , $ 208 million and $ 118 million , respectively . the tax benefit realized from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was approximately $ 33 million , $ 31 million and $ 14 million , respectively . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 17997353 at december 31 , 2014 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 19017057 shares at december 31 , 2014 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2014 , we issued approximately 2.4 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 include 21490 , 27076 and 25620 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which is accounted for as a liability until such awards are paid to the participants in cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full for these awards on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/share unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/share unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals . the personnel and compensation committee ( 201cp&cc 201d ) of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to certain incentive/performance unit share awards . these awards have either a three-year or a four-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . restricted stock/share unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 3 years to 5 years . beginning in 2013 , we incorporated several enhanced risk- related performance changes to certain long-term incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics on both an absolute basis and relative to our peers , final payout amounts will be subject to reduction if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreements . however , the p&cc has the discretion to waive any or all of this reduction under certain circumstances . the weighted-average grant date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was $ 80.79 , $ 64.77 and $ 60.68 per share , respectively . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was approximately $ 119 million , $ 63 million and $ 55 million , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 121 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/share unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average grant date fair value nonvested restricted stock/ weighted- average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2013</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 1647</td><td>weighted-averagegrant datefair value $ 63.49</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ share units 3483</td><td>weighted-averagegrant datefair value $ 62.70</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>723</td><td>79.90</td><td>1276</td><td>81.29</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested/released</td><td>-513 ( 513 )</td><td>63.64</td><td>-962 ( 962 )</td><td>62.32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td><td>69.18</td><td>-145 ( 145 )</td><td>69.44</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>1837</td><td>$ 69.84</td><td>3652</td><td>$ 69.03</td></tr></table> the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 185 .\nQuestion: what was the tax benefit realized from option exercises under all incentive plans in 2014, in millions?\nAnswer: 33.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013, also in millions?\nAnswer: 31.0\nQuestion: what was, then, in millions, the total tax of benefit realized from option exercises under all incentive plans for both years combined?\nAnswer: 64.0\nQuestion: what was that tax benefit in 2012, in millions?\nAnswer: 14.0\nQuestion: including, then, 2012, what then becomes that total of tax benefit realized from option exercises under all incentive plans, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "78.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8346	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\no 2019 r e i l l y a u t o m o t i v e 2 0 0 6 a n n u a l r e p o r t p a g e 38 $ 11080000 , in the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 , was $ 7702000 and the weighted-average period of time over which this cost will be recognized is 3.3 years . employee stock purchase plan the company 2019s employee stock purchase plan permits all eligible employees to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value . participants may authorize the company to withhold up to 5% ( 5 % ) of their annual salary to participate in the plan . the stock purchase plan authorizes up to 2600000 shares to be granted . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company issued 165306 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.36 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company issued 161903 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.57 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company issued 187754 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 20.85 per share . sfas no . 123r requires compensation expense to be recognized based on the discount between the grant date fair value and the employee purchase price for shares sold to employees . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 799000 of compensation cost related to employee share purchases and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 295000 . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 400000 shares were reserved for future issuance . other employee benefit plans the company sponsors a contributory profit sharing and savings plan that covers substantially all employees who are at least 21 years of age and have at least six months of service . the company has agreed to make matching contributions equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 2% ( 2 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed and 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 4% ( 4 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed . the company also makes additional discretionary profit sharing contributions to the plan on an annual basis as determined by the board of directors . the company 2019s matching and profit sharing contributions under this plan are funded in the form of shares of the company 2019s common stock . a total of 4200000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 6429000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2372000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company recorded $ 6606000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2444000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company recorded $ 5278000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 1969000 . the compensation cost recorded in 2006 includes matching contributions made in 2006 and profit sharing contributions accrued in 2006 to be funded with issuance of shares of common stock in 2007 . the company issued 204000 shares in 2006 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 34.34 . the company issued 210461 shares in 2005 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 25.79 . the company issued 238828 shares in 2004 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 19.36 . a portion of these shares related to profit sharing contributions accrued in prior periods . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 1061000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . the company has in effect a performance incentive plan for the company 2019s senior management under which the company awards shares of restricted stock that vest equally over a three-year period and are held in escrow until such vesting has occurred . shares are forfeited when an employee ceases employment . a total of 800000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . shares awarded under this plan are valued based on the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant and compensation cost is recorded over the vesting period . the company recorded $ 416000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2006 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 154000 . the company recorded $ 289000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 107000 . the company recorded $ 248000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2004 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 93000 . the total fair value of shares vested ( at vest date ) for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 were $ 503000 , $ 524000 and $ 335000 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 was $ 536000 . the company awarded 18698 shares under this plan in 2006 with an average grant date fair value of $ 33.12 . the company awarded 14986 shares under this plan in 2005 with an average grant date fair value of $ 25.41 . the company awarded 15834 shares under this plan in 2004 with an average grant date fair value of $ 19.05 . compensation cost for shares awarded in 2006 will be recognized over the three-year vesting period . changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the year ended december 31 , 2006 were as follows : weighted- average grant date shares fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2005</td><td>15052</td><td>$ 22.68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted during the period</td><td>18698</td><td>33.12</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested during the period</td><td>-15685 ( 15685 )</td><td>26.49</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited during the period</td><td>-1774 ( 1774 )</td><td>27.94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2006</td><td>16291</td><td>$ 30.80</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 659000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( cont inued ) .\nQuestion: what was the percentage of non-vested restricted stock balance to total shares reserved for future issuance as of 12/31/06?\nAnswer: 0.02472\nQuestion: what was the amount of cash raised from the issuance of shares in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4463665.71" } ]
CONVFINQA7520	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/07</td><td>12/08</td><td>12/09</td><td>12/10</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity national information services inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>70.08</td><td>101.93</td><td>120.01</td><td>117.34</td><td>157.38</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>63.00</td><td>79.67</td><td>91.67</td><td>93.61</td><td>108.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services</td><td>100.00</td><td>68.26</td><td>99.41</td><td>97.33</td><td>118.68</td><td>151.90</td></tr></table> s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( \"metavante\" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( \"lps\" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .\nQuestion: what was the variation in the value of the fidelity national information services inc . from 2007 to 2012?\nAnswer: 57.38\nQuestion: and what is this variation as a percentage of that value in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.5738" } ]
CONVFINQA1910	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 included $ 1635 million , net of $ 953 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2017 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 398</td><td>$ 173</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>359</td><td>156</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>297</td><td>164</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>259</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>221</td><td>147</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1115</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 2649</td><td>$ 1079</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-187 ( 187 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 892</td></tr></table> approximately 97% ( 97 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 480 million in 2017 , $ 535 million in 2016 , and $ 590 million in 2015 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 5% ( 5 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2017 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 285 million to $ 310 million . we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .\nQuestion: what are minimum lease payments for operating leases?\nAnswer: 2649.0\nQuestion: what are payments for capital leases?\nAnswer: 1079.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 3728.0\nQuestion: what is the value for capital leases?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1079.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4176	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunderlying physical transaction occurs . we have not qualified commodity derivative instruments used in our osm or rm&t segments for hedge accounting . as a result , we recognize in net income all changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used in those operations . open commodity derivative positions as of december 31 , 2008 and sensitivity analysis at december 31 , 2008 , our e&p segment held open derivative contracts to mitigate the price risk on natural gas held in storage or purchased to be marketed with our own natural gas production in amounts that were in line with normal levels of activity . at december 31 , 2008 , we had no significant open derivative contracts related to our future sales of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas and therefore remained substantially exposed to market prices of these commodities . the osm segment holds crude oil options which were purchased by western for a three year period ( january 2007 to december 2009 ) . the premiums for the purchased put options had been partially offset through the sale of call options for the same three-year period , resulting in a net premium liability . payment of the net premium liability is deferred until the settlement of the option contracts . as of december 31 , 2008 , the following put and call options were outstanding: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>option expiration date</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>option contract volumes ( barrels per day ) :</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>put options purchased</td><td>20000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>call options sold</td><td>15000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average exercise price ( dollars per barrel ) :</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>put options</td><td>$ 50.50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>call options</td><td>$ 90.50</td></tr></table> in the first quarter of 2009 , we sold derivative instruments at an average exercise price of $ 50.50 which effectively offset the open put options for the remainder of 2009 . at december 31 , 2008 , the number of open derivative contracts held by our rm&t segment was lower than in previous periods . starting in the second quarter of 2008 , we decreased our use of derivatives to mitigate crude oil price risk between the time that domestic spot crude oil purchases are priced and when they are actually refined into salable petroleum products . instead , we are addressing this price risk through other means , including changes in contractual terms and crude oil acquisition practices . additionally , in previous periods , certain contracts in our rm&t segment for the purchase or sale of commodities were not qualified or designated as normal purchase or normal sales under generally accepted accounting principles and therefore were accounted for as derivative instruments . during the second quarter of 2008 , as we decreased our use of derivatives , we began to designate such contracts for the normal purchase and normal sale exclusion. .\nQuestion: what was the total of option contract volumes ( barrels per day ) for put options purchased and call options sold, combined?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "35000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8986	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ngain on business divestitures and impairments , net we strive to have a number one or number two market position in each of the markets we serve , or have a clear path on how we will achieve a leading market position over time . where we cannot establish a leading market position , or where operations are not generating acceptable returns , we may decide to divest certain assets and reallocate resources to other markets . asset or business divestitures could result in gains , losses or asset impairment charges that may be material to our results of operations in a given period . during 2018 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 44.9 million . during 2017 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 27.1 million . we also recorded a gain on business divestitures of $ 6.8 million due to the transfer of ownership of the landfill gas collection and control system and the remaining post-closure and environmental liabilities associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we recorded a charge to earnings of $ 4.6 million primarily related to environmental costs associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we also recorded a net gain related to a business divestiture of $ 4.7 million . restructuring charges in january 2018 , we eliminated certain positions following the consolidation of select back-office functions , including but not limited to the integration of our national accounts support functions into our existing corporate support functions . these changes include a reduction in administrative staffing and the closure of certain office locations . during 2018 , we incurred restructuring charges of $ 26.4 million that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , the closure of offices with non-cancelable lease agreements , and the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems . we paid $ 24.7 million during 2018 related to these restructuring efforts . in january 2016 , we realigned our field support functions by combining our three regions into two field groups , consolidating our areas and streamlining select operational support roles at our phoenix headquarters . additionally , in the second quarter of 2016 , we began the redesign of our back-office functions as well as the consolidation of over 100 customer service locations into three customer resource centers . the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems continued into 2018 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we incurred $ 17.6 million and $ 40.7 million of restructuring charges , respectively , that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , transition costs , relocation benefits , and the closure of offices with lease agreements with non-cancelable terms . the savings realized from these restructuring efforts have been reinvested in our customer-focused programs and initiatives . interest expense the following table provides the components of interest expense , including accretion of debt discounts and accretion of discounts primarily associated with environmental and risk insurance liabilities assumed in acquisitions ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 349.4</td><td>$ 324.8</td><td>$ 324.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash interest</td><td>41.2</td><td>43.6</td><td>53.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : capitalized interest</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td><td>-6.5 ( 6.5 )</td><td>-6.2 ( 6.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total interest expense</td><td>$ 383.8</td><td>$ 361.9</td><td>$ 371.3</td></tr></table> total interest expense for 2018 increased compared to 2017 primarily due to the increase in debt outstanding during the period and higher interest rates on floating rate debt . total interest expense for 2017 decreased .\nQuestion: what is the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2018?\nAnswer: 349.4\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\nAnswer: 324.8\nQuestion: what is the net change among these years?\nAnswer: 24.6\nQuestion: what is the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2017?\nAnswer: 324.8\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.07574" } ]
CONVFINQA3178	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2224</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014</td><td>-305 ( 305 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1666</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .\nQuestion: what was the tax benefit from the the stipulated settlement in the business combination granting customer credits in 2015?\nAnswer: 41.0\nQuestion: and what was the net revenue in that same year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2224.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4697	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfair value of financial instruments : the company 2019s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents , marketable securities , accounts receivable , certain investments , accounts payable , borrowings , and derivative contracts . the fair values of cash and cash equivalents , accounts receivable , accounts payable , and short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt approximated carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments . available-for-sale marketable securities and investments , in addition to certain derivative instruments , are recorded at fair values as indicated in the preceding disclosures . for its long-term debt the company utilized third-party quotes to estimate fair values ( classified as level 2 ) . information with respect to the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of these financial instruments follow: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>december 31 2012 carrying value</td><td>december 31 2012 fair value</td><td>december 31 2012 carrying value</td><td>fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt excluding current portion</td><td>$ 4916</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 4484</td><td>$ 5002</td></tr></table> the fair values reflected above consider the terms of the related debt absent the impacts of derivative/hedging activity . the carrying amount of long-term debt referenced above is impacted by certain fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps that are designated as fair value hedges and by the designation of fixed rate eurobond securities issued by the company as hedging instruments of the company 2019s net investment in its european subsidiaries . 3m 2019s fixed-rate bonds were trading at a premium at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 due to the low interest rates and tightening of 3m 2019s credit spreads. .\nQuestion: what was the carrying value of long-term debt excluding current portion at the end of 2012?\nAnswer: 4916.0\nQuestion: what was the fair value of long-term debt excluding current portion at the end of 2012?\nAnswer: 4484.0\nQuestion: what was the change in value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "432.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8998	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nschlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>acquisition of smith international inc .</td><td>100</td><td>76</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>8</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1434</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>1361</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .\nQuestion: what is the sum of balances of outstanding shares for 2009 and 2010?\nAnswer: 2556.0\nQuestion: what is the average?\nAnswer: 1278.0\nQuestion: what about the sum of balances of outstanding shares for december 2008 and december 2009?\nAnswer: 2389.0\nQuestion: what about the average for these years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1194.5" } ]
CONVFINQA9217	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ngoodwill is reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment . in addition , the company performs an impairment analysis of other intangible assets based on the occurrence of other factors . such factors include , but are not limited to , signifi- cant changes in membership , state funding , medical contracts and provider networks and contracts . an impairment loss is rec- ognized if the carrying value of intangible assets exceeds the implied fair value . the company did not recognize any impair- ment losses for the periods presented . medical claims liabilities medical services costs include claims paid , claims reported but not yet paid ( inventory ) , estimates for claims incurred but not yet received ( ibnr ) and estimates for the costs necessary to process unpaid claims . the estimates of medical claims liabilities are developed using standard actuarial methods based upon historical data for payment patterns , cost trends , product mix , seasonality , utiliza- tion of healthcare services and other relevant factors including product changes . these estimates are continually reviewed and adjustments , if necessary , are reflected in the period known . management did not change actuarial methods during the years presented . management believes the amount of medical claims payable is reasonable and adequate to cover the company 2019s liabil- ity for unpaid claims as of december 31 , 2005 ; however , actual claim payments may differ from established estimates . revenue recognition the majority of the company 2019s medicaid managed care premi- um revenue is received monthly based on fixed rates per member as determined by state contracts . some contracts allow for addi- tional premium related to certain supplemental services provided such as maternity deliveries . revenue is recognized as earned over the covered period of services . revenues are recorded based on membership and eligibility data provided by the states , which may be adjusted by the states for updates to this membership and eligibility data . these adjustments are immaterial in relation to total revenue recorded and are reflected in the period known . premiums collected in advance are recorded as unearned revenue . the specialty services segment generates revenue under con- tracts with state and local government entities , our health plans and third-party customers . revenues for services are recognized when the services are provided or as ratably earned over the cov- ered period of services . for performance-based contracts , the company does not recognize revenue subject to refund until data is sufficient to measure performance . such amounts are recorded as unearned revenue . revenues due to the company are recorded as premium and related receivables and recorded net of an allowance for uncol- lectible accounts based on historical trends and management 2019s judgment on the collectibility of these accounts . activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowances beginning of year</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 219</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>80</td><td>407</td><td>472</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs of uncollectible receivables</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>-552 ( 552 )</td><td>-84 ( 84 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allowances end of year</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td></tr></table> significant customers centene receives the majority of its revenues under contracts or subcontracts with state medicaid managed care programs . the contracts , which expire on various dates between june 30 , 2006 and august 31 , 2008 , are expected to be renewed . contracts with the states of indiana , kansas , texas and wisconsin each accounted for 18% ( 18 % ) , 12% ( 12 % ) , 22% ( 22 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , of the company 2019s revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . reinsurance centene has purchased reinsurance from third parties to cover eligible healthcare services . the current reinsurance program covers 90% ( 90 % ) of inpatient healthcare expenses in excess of annual deductibles of $ 300 per member , up to a lifetime maximum of $ 2000 . centene 2019s medicaid managed care subsidiaries are respon- sible for inpatient charges in excess of an average daily per diem . reinsurance recoveries were $ 4014 , $ 3730 , and $ 5345 , in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4105 , $ 6724 , and $ 6185 in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance recoveries , net of expenses , are included in medical costs . other income ( expense ) other income ( expense ) consists principally of investment income and interest expense . investment income is derived from the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , restricted deposits and investments . interest expense relates to borrowings under our credit facility , mortgage interest , interest on capital leases and credit facility fees . income taxes deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases . deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled . the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of the tax rate change . valuation allowances are provided when it is considered more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized . in determining if a deductible temporary difference or net operating loss can be realized , the company considers future reversals of .\nQuestion: what was the change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts from year end 2004 to 2005?\nAnswer: -119.0\nQuestion: and what was that allowance in the end of 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "462.0" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.