id
stringlengths 10
14
| entries
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|---|
CONVFINQA7093
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model for grants and the resulting weighted average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>intrinsic value</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 10</td><td>$ 18</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>exercise proceeds</td><td>7</td><td>11</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax benefit realized</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr></table> stock units during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company granted rsus to certain employees under the 2007 plan and 2017 omnibus plan , as applicable . rsus generally vest based on continued employment with the company over periods ranging from one to three years. .\nQuestion: what is the change in value of intrinsic value from 2016 to 2018?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-9.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA749
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: combined, what were the liabilities for the company for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits in 2013 and 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "19.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1979
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the year ended december 31 , 2005 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expensemillions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the price of our common stock increased at least 20% ( 20 % ) from the price at the time of the reload grant . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , reload option grants represented $ 19 million of the pro forma expense noted above . there were no reload option grants during 2007 and 2006 as stock options exercised after january 1 , 2006 are not eligible for the reload feature . earnings per share 2013 basic earnings per share are calculated on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period . diluted earnings per share include shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and stock-based awards where the conversion of such instruments would be dilutive . use of estimates 2013 our consolidated financial statements include estimates and assumptions regarding certain assets , liabilities , revenue , and expenses and the disclosure of certain contingent assets and liabilities . actual future results may differ from such estimates . income taxes 2013 as required under fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , we account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns . these expected future tax consequences are measured based on provisions of tax law as currently enacted ; the effects of future changes in tax laws are not anticipated . future tax law changes , such as a change in the corporate tax rate , could have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations . when appropriate , we record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to offset future tax benefits that may not be realized . in determining whether a valuation allowance is appropriate , we consider whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized , based on management 2019s judgments regarding the best available evidence about future events . when we have claimed tax benefits that may be challenged by a tax authority , these uncertain tax positions are accounted for under fasb interpretation no . 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes , an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 ( fin 48 ) . we adopted fin 48 beginning january 1 , 2007 . prior to 2007 , income tax contingencies were accounted for under fasb statement no . 5 , accounting for contingencies . under fin 48 , we recognize tax benefits only for tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities . the amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement . a liability for 201cunrecognized tax benefits 201d is .\nQuestion: what was the earnings per share in 2013 diluted as reported?\nAnswer: 3.71\nQuestion: what was earnings per share for 2012 diluted pro forma?\nAnswer: 3.85\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: -0.14\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-0.03636"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4399
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table presents the net periodic pension and opeb cost/ ( benefit ) for the years ended december 31 : millions 2013 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>est.2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net periodic pension cost</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 89</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net periodic opeb cost/ ( benefit )</td><td>15</td><td>13</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr></table> our net periodic pension cost is expected to increase to approximately $ 111 million in 2013 from $ 89 million in 2012 . the increase is driven mainly by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.78% ( 3.78 % ) , our net periodic opeb expense is expected to increase to approximately $ 15 million in 2013 from $ 13 million in 2012 . the increase in our net periodic opeb cost is primarily driven by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.48% ( 3.48 % ) . cautionary information certain statements in this report , and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the sec ( as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us ) , are , or will be , forward-looking statements as defined by the securities act of 1933 and the securities exchange act of 1934 . these forward-looking statements and information include , without limitation , ( a ) statements in the ceo 2019s letter preceding part i ; statements regarding planned capital expenditures under the caption 201c2013 capital expenditures 201d in item 2 of part i ; statements regarding dividends in item 5 ; and statements and information set forth under the captions 201c2013 outlook 201d and 201cliquidity and capital resources 201d in this item 7 , and ( b ) any other statements or information in this report ( including information incorporated herein by reference ) regarding : expectations as to financial performance , revenue growth and cost savings ; the time by which goals , targets , or objectives will be achieved ; projections , predictions , expectations , estimates , or forecasts as to our business , financial and operational results , future economic performance , and general economic conditions ; expectations as to operational or service performance or improvements ; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations and/or service , including capital expenditures for infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisitions , any strategic business acquisitions , and modifications to our transportation plans ( including statements set forth in item 2 as to expectations related to our planned capital expenditures ) ; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services ; expectations as to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results ; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration ; estimates and expectations regarding tax matters ; expectations that claims , litigation , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , labor negotiations or agreements , or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity and any other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts . forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology , such as 201cbelieves , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201canticipates , 201d 201cprojects 201d and similar words , phrases or expressions . forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results , and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that , or by which , such performance or results will be achieved . forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and information . forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information , and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances . however , such information and assumptions ( and , therefore , such forward-looking statements and information ) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control . the risk factors in item 1a of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or information . to the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary , we will update or amend these risk factors in a form 10-q , form 8-k or subsequent form 10-k . all forward-looking statements are qualified by , and should be read in conjunction with , these risk factors . forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made . we assume no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results , changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information . if we do update one or more forward-looking .\nQuestion: what was the 2012 pension cost?\nAnswer: 89.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2011?\nAnswer: 78.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of 2012 to 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.14103"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1029
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 1 . basis of presentation the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles ( \"u.s . gaap\" ) . the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of aon plc and all of its controlled subsidiaries ( \"aon\" or the \"company\" ) . all intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated . the consolidated financial statements include , in the opinion of management , all adjustments necessary to present fairly the company's consolidated financial position , results of operations and cash flows for all periods presented . reclassification certain amounts in prior years' consolidated financial statements and related notes have been reclassified to conform to the 2015 presentation . in prior periods , long-term investments were included in investments in the consolidated statement of financial position . these amounts are now included in other non-current assets in the consolidated statement of financial position , as shown in note 3 to these consolidated financial statements . long-term investments were $ 135 million at december 31 , 2015 and $ 143 million at december 31 , 2014 . in prior periods , prepaid pensions were included in other non-current assets in the consolidated statement of financial position . these amounts are now separately disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position . prepaid pensions were $ 1033 million at december 31 , 2015 and $ 933 million at december 31 , 2014 . upon vesting of certain share-based payment arrangements , employees may elect to use a portion of the shares to satisfy tax withholding requirements , in which case aon makes a payment to the taxing authority on the employee 2019s behalf and remits the remaining shares to the employee . the company has historically presented amounts due to taxing authorities within cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows . the amounts are now included in 201cissuance of shares for employee benefit plans 201d within cash flows from financing activities . the company believes this presentation provides greater clarity into the operating and financing activities of the company as the substance and accounting for these transactions is that of a share repurchase . it also aligns the company 2019s presentation to be consistent with industry practice . amounts reported in issuance of shares for employee benefit plans were $ 227 million , $ 170 million , and $ 120 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . these amounts , which were reclassified from accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other assets and liabilities , were $ 85 million and $ 85 million in 2014 , and $ 62 million and $ 58 million in 2013 , respectively . changes to the presentation in the consolidated statements of cash flows for 2014 and 2013 were made related to certain line items within financing activities . the following line items and respective amounts have been aggregated in a new line item titled 201cnoncontrolling interests and other financing activities 201d within financing activities. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchases of shares from noncontrolling interests</td><td>3</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividends paid to noncontrolling interests</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from sale-leaseback</td><td>25</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> use of estimates the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with u.s . gaap requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , and the reported amounts of reserves and expenses . these estimates and assumptions are based on management's best estimates and judgments . management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors , including the current economic environment . management believes its estimates to be reasonable given the current facts available . aon adjusts such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate . illiquid credit markets , volatile equity markets , and foreign currency exchange rate movements increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions . as future events and their effects cannot be determined , among other factors , with precision , actual results could differ significantly from these estimates . changes in estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment would , if applicable , be reflected in the financial statements in future periods. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the amount reported to issuance of shares for employee benefit plans in 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: 397.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2013?\nAnswer: 120.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum including 2013?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "517.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3080
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2018 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 2641</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 2564</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>3139</td><td>91</td><td>3048</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>3561</td><td>115</td><td>3446</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>3994</td><td>140</td><td>3854</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>4357</td><td>169</td><td>4188</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2014 2013 2018</td><td>25807</td><td>1269</td><td>24538</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense in accordance with sfas no . 112 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for postemployment benefits 201d by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 2643 , $ ( 3418 ) and $ 8400 , respectively , during the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the company has an accrued liability related to the severance plan and other severance obligations in the amount of $ 63863 and $ 56172 at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . a facility fee of 8 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 2030 , is paid annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 37 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 for the credit facility which are being amortized straight- line over three years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility or prior facilities totaled $ 2353 , $ 2477 and $ 2717 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2008 or december 31 , 2007 . the majority of credit facility lenders are customers or affiliates of customers of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 .\nQuestion: how much do the benefit payments in 2010 represent in relation to the 2009 ones?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.18856"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5591
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .\nQuestion: what was the value of reit index in 2003?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "138.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1179
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfor the valuation of the 4199466 performance-based options granted in 2005 : the risk free interest rate was 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) , the volatility factor for the expected market price of the common stock was 44% ( 44 % ) , the expected dividend yield was zero and the objective time to exercise was 4.7 years with an objective in the money assumption of 2.95 years . it was also expected that the initial public offering assumption would occur within a 9 month period from grant date . the fair value of the performance-based options was calculated to be $ 5.85 . the fair value for fis options granted in 2006 was estimated at the date of grant using a black-scholes option- pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions . the risk free interest rates used in the calculation are the rate that corresponds to the weighted average expected life of an option . the risk free interest rate used for options granted during 2006 was 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) . a volatility factor for the expected market price of the common stock of 30% ( 30 % ) was used for options granted in 2006 . the expected dividend yield used for 2006 was 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) . a weighted average expected life of 6.4 years was used for 2006 . the weighted average fair value of each option granted during 2006 was $ 15.52 . at december 31 , 2006 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option grants is $ 86.1 million , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.9 years . the company intends to limit dilution caused by option exercises , including anticipated exercises , by repurchasing shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions . during 2006 , the company repurchased 4261200 shares at an average price of $ 37.60 . on october 25 , 2006 , the company 2019s board of directors approved a plan authorizing the repurchase of up to an additional $ 200 million worth of the company 2019s common stock . defined benefit plans certegy pension plan in connection with the certegy merger , the company announced that it will terminate and settle the certegy u.s . retirement income plan ( usrip ) . the estimated impact of this settlement was reflected in the purchase price allocation as an increase in the pension liability , less the fair value of the pension plan assets , based on estimates of the total cost to settle the liability through the purchase of annuity contracts or lump sum settlements to the beneficiaries . the final settlement will not occur until after an irs determination has been obtained , which is expected to be received in 2007 . in addition to the net pension plan obligation of $ 21.6 million , the company assumed liabilities of $ 8.0 million for certegy 2019s supplemental executive retirement plan ( 201cserp 201d ) and $ 3.0 mil- lion for a postretirement benefit plan . a reconciliation of the changes in the fair value of plan assets of the usrip for the period from february 1 , 2006 through december 31 , 2006 is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value of plan assets at acquisition date</td><td>$ 57369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on plan assets</td><td>8200</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>benefits paid</td><td>-797 ( 797 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of plan assets at end of year</td><td>$ 64772</td></tr></table> benefits paid in the above table include only those amounts paid directly from plan assets . as of december 31 , 2006 and for 2007 through the pay out of the pension liability , the assets are being invested in u.s . treasury bonds due to the short duration until final payment . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the total cash spent for the repurchase of shares during 2006?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "160221120.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1668
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2005 and 2004. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2005</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 19.28</td><td>$ 17.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>21.16</td><td>16.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>25.20</td><td>20.70</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>28.33</td><td>22.73</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2004</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 13.12</td><td>$ 9.89</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>16.00</td><td>11.13</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>15.85</td><td>13.10</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>18.75</td><td>15.19</td></tr></table> on march 9 , 2006 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 29.83 per share as reported on the nyse . as of march 9 , 2006 , we had 419677495 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 687 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . in august 2005 , we amended and restated our charter to , among other things , eliminate our class b common stock and class c common stock . the information under 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 201d from the definitive proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference into item 12 of this annual report . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our credit facilities and the indentures governing the terms of our debt securities contain covenants that may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests . under our credit facilities , the borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the applicable credit facility only if no default exists or would be created thereby . the indenture governing the terms of the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes due 2011 ( ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes ) prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes also contain certain restrictive covenants , which prohibit the restricted subsidiaries under these indentures from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under our credit facilities and our notes indentures , see note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report and the section entitled 201cmanagement 2019s .\nQuestion: what was the common stock price from the highest price for the quarter ended december 31 of 2006?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "28.33"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2075
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries ; and 2022 sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies . subject to certain exceptions , the indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes permit the issuers of the notes and their restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness , including secured indebtedness . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . principal payments scheduled to be made on the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total ( in $ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1485</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter ( 1 )</td><td>1590</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>3498</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans in north america , europe and asia . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 84% ( 84 % ) and 76% ( 76 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . pension costs under the company 2019s retirement plans are actuarially determined . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in north america , europe , and asia covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . the company 2019s matching contribution to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and aggregated $ 11 million , $ 12 million , $ 8 million and $ 3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 and the three months ended march 31 , 2004 , respectively . celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what portion of the total principal payments is due after 2011?\nAnswer: 0.45455\nQuestion: what is the total principal payments as of march 31,2006?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "3498.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA559
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nresults of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 6179</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>91</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grand gulf recovery</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2017 net revenue</td><td>$ 6318</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\nQuestion: what was the change in the net revenue from 2016 to 2017?\nAnswer: 139.0\nQuestion: and what was that net revenue in 2016?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "6179.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA673
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfor fiscal year 2005 , the effective tax rate includes the impact of $ 11.6 million tax expense associated with repatriation of approximately $ 185.0 million of foreign earnings under the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . for fiscal year 2004 , the effective tax rate reflects the tax benefit derived from higher earnings in low-tax jurisdictions . during fiscal year 2006 , primarily due to a tax accounting method change , there was a decrease of $ 83.2 million in the current deferred tax assets , and a corresponding increase in non-current deferred tax assets . in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 , we changed our tax accounting method on our tax return for fiscal year 2005 with respect to the current portion of deferred revenue to follow the recognition of revenue under u.s . generally accepted accounting principles . this accounting method change , as well as other adjustments made to our taxable income upon the filing of the fiscal year 2005 tax return , resulted in an increase in our operating loss ( nol ) carryforwards . in may 2006 , the tax increase prevention and reconciliation act of 2005 was enacted , which provides a three-year exception to current u.s . taxation of certain foreign intercompany income . this provision will first apply to synopsys in fiscal year 2007 . management estimates that had such provisions been applied for fiscal 2006 , our income tax expense would have been reduced by approximately $ 3 million . in december 2006 , the tax relief and health care act of 2006 was enacted , which retroactively extended the research and development credit from january 1 , 2006 . as a result , we will record an expected increase in our fiscal 2006 research and development credit of between $ 1.5 million and $ 1.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 . revision of prior year financial statements . as part of our remediation of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting identified in fiscal 2005 relating to accounting for income taxes we implemented additional internal control and review procedures . through such procedures , in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 , we identified four errors totaling $ 8.2 million which affected our income tax provision in fiscal years 2001 through 2005 . we concluded that these errors were not material to any prior year financial statements . although the errors are not material to prior periods , we elected to revise prior year financial statements to correct such errors . the fiscal periods in which the errors originated , and the resulting change in provision ( benefit ) for income taxes for each year , are reflected in the following table : year ended october 31 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2001</td><td>2002</td><td>2003</td><td>2004</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 205</td><td>$ 1833</td><td>$ 5303</td><td>$ -748 ( 748 )</td><td>$ 1636</td></tr></table> the errors were as follows : ( 1 ) synopsys inadvertently provided a $ 1.4 million tax benefit for the write- off of goodwill relating to an acquisition in fiscal 2002 ; ( 2 ) synopsys did not accrue interest and penalties for certain foreign tax contingency items in the amount of $ 3.2 million ; ( 3 ) synopsys made certain computational errors relating to foreign dividends of $ 2.3 million ; and ( 4 ) synopsys did not record a valuation allowance relating to certain state tax credits of $ 1.3 million . as result of this revision , non-current deferred tax assets decreased by $ 8.1 million and current taxes payable increased by $ 0.2 million . retained earnings decreased by $ 8.2 million and additional paid in capital decreased by $ 0.1 million . see item 9a . controls and procedures for a further discussion of our remediation of the material weakness . tax effects of stock awards . in november 2005 , fasb issued a staff position ( fsp ) on fas 123 ( r ) -3 , transition election related to accounting for the tax effects of share-based payment awards . effective upon issuance , this fsp describes an alternative transition method for calculating the tax effects of share-based compensation pursuant to sfas 123 ( r ) . the alternative transition method includes simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool ( apic pool ) related to the tax effects of employee stock based compensation , and to determine the subsequent impact on the apic pool and the statement of cash flows of the tax effects of employee share-based compensation .\nQuestion: what is the provision for income taxes caused by errors in 2003?\nAnswer: 5303.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2002?\nAnswer: 1833.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of 2003 to 2002?\nAnswer: 2.89307\nQuestion: what is that less 1?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.89307"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6571
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services . as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds . as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies . we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits . for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year . as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances . table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>client deposits ( 1 )</td><td>$ 195276</td><td>$ 182268</td><td>$ 167470</td><td>$ 143043</td></tr></table> client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively . short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority . as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof . we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration . the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .\nQuestion: what is the net change in deposits of clients from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: 13008.0\nQuestion: what growth rate does this represent?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.07137"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8005
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n5 . stock based compensation overview maa accounts for its stock based employee compensation plans in accordance with accounting standards governing stock based compensation . these standards require an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the award's fair value on the grant date and recognize the cost over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award , which is generally the vesting period . any liability awards issued are remeasured at each reporting period . maa 2019s stock compensation plans consist of a number of incentives provided to attract and retain independent directors , executive officers and key employees . incentives are currently granted under the second amended and restated 2013 stock incentive plan , or the stock plan , which was approved at the 2018 annual meeting of maa shareholders . the stock plan allows for the grant of restricted stock and stock options up to 2000000 shares . maa believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders . compensation expense is generally recognized for service based restricted stock awards using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the shares regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions . compensation expense for market and performance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in \"general and administrative expenses\" . total compensation expense under the stock plan was $ 12.9 million , $ 10.8 million and $ 12.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was $ 0.5 million , $ 0.2 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was $ 13.5 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.1 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 2.9 million , $ 4.8 million and $ 2.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is provided below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , was $ 71.85 , $ 84.53 and $ 73.20 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free rate</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % ) - 2.14% ( 2.14 % )</td><td>0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )</td><td>0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.884% ( 3.884 % )</td><td>3.573% ( 3.573 % )</td><td>3.634% ( 3.634 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>15.05% ( 15.05 % ) - 17.18% ( 17.18 % )</td><td>20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )</td><td>18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>requisite service period</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td></tr></table> the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the .\nQuestion: what was the change in the dividend yield from 2017 to 2018?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.311"
}
] |
CONVFINQA165
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ngain or loss on ownership change in map results from contributions to map of certain environmental capital expenditures and leased property acquisitions funded by marathon and ashland . in accordance with map 2019s limited liability company agreement , in certain instances , environmental capital expenditures and acquisitions of leased properties are funded by the original contributor of the assets , but no change in ownership interest may result from these contributions . an excess of ashland funded improvements over marathon funded improvements results in a net gain and an excess of marathon funded improvements over ashland funded improvements results in a net loss . cost of revenues increased by $ 5.822 billion in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 6.040 billion in 2003 from 2002 . the increases are primarily in the rm&t segment and result from higher acquisition costs for crude oil , refined products , refinery charge and blend feedstocks and increased manufacturing expenses . selling , general and administrative expenses increased by $ 105 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 97 million in 2003 from 2002 . the increase in 2004 was primarily due to increased stock-based compensation and higher costs associated with business transformation and outsourcing . our 2004 results were also impacted by start-up costs associated with the lng project in equatorial guinea and the increased cost of complying with governmental regulations . the increase in 2003 was primarily due to increased employee benefit expenses ( caused by increased pension expense resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions and a decrease in realized returns on plan assets ) and other employee related costs . additionally , during 2003 , we recorded a charge of $ 24 million related to organizational and business process changes . inventory market valuation reserve ( 2018 2018imv 2019 2019 ) is established to reduce the cost basis of inventories to current market value . generally , we will establish an imv reserve when crude oil prices fall below $ 22 per barrel . the 2002 results of operations include credits to income from operations of $ 71 million , reversing the imv reserve at december 31 , 2001 . net interest and other financial costs decreased by $ 25 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 82 million in 2003 from 2002 . the decrease in 2004 is primarily due to an increase in interest income . the decrease in 2003 is primarily due to an increase in capitalized interest related to increased long-term construction projects , the favorable effect of interest rate swaps , the favorable effect of a reduction in interest on tax deficiencies and increased interest income on investments . additionally , included in net interest and other financing costs are foreign currency gains of $ 9 million , $ 13 million and $ 8 million for 2004 , 2003 and 2002 . loss from early extinguishment of debt in 2002 was attributable to the retirement of $ 337 million aggregate principal amount of debt , resulting in a loss of $ 53 million . minority interest in income of map , which represents ashland 2019s 38 percent ownership interest , increased by $ 230 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 129 million in 2003 from 2002 . map income was higher in 2004 compared to 2003 and in 2003 compared to 2002 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . minority interest in loss of equatorial guinea lng holdings limited , which represents gepetrol 2019s 25 percent ownership interest , was $ 7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from gepetrol 2019s share of start-up costs associated with the lng project in equatorial guinea . provision for income taxes increased by $ 143 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 215 million in 2003 from 2002 , primarily due to $ 388 million and $ 720 million increases in income before income taxes . the effective tax rate for 2004 was 36.6 percent compared to 36.6 percent and 42.1 percent for 2003 and 2002 . the higher rate in 2002 was due to the united kingdom enactment of a supplementary 10 percent tax on profits from the north sea oil and gas production , retroactively effective to april 17 , 2002 . in 2002 , we recognized a one-time noncash deferred tax adjustment of $ 61 million as a result of the rate increase . the following is an analysis of the effective tax rate for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory tax rate</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effects of foreign operations ( a )</td><td>1.3</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects</td><td>1.6</td><td>2.2</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other federal tax effects</td><td>-1.3 ( 1.3 )</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate</td><td>36.6% ( 36.6 % )</td><td>36.6% ( 36.6 % )</td><td>42.1% ( 42.1 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the deferred tax effect related to the enactment of a supplemental tax in the u.k . increased the effective tax rate 7.0 percent in .\nQuestion: by what amount did effects of foreign operations decline from 2002 to 2004?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-4.3"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6227
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 2 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2011 is shown in the following table . all facilities are leased , except for 165000 square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or part of a facility restructuring. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximate square footage</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alpharetta georgia</td><td>260000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>arlington virginia</td><td>119000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>jersey city new jersey</td><td>107000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>menlo park california</td><td>91000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>sandy utah</td><td>66000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>new york new york</td><td>39000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>chicago illinois</td><td>25000</td></tr></table> all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 28 e*trade branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 7000 square feet . we believe our facilities space is adequate to meet our needs in 2012 . item 3 . legal proceedings on october 27 , 2000 , ajaxo , inc . ( 201cajaxo 201d ) filed a complaint in the superior court for the state of california , county of santa clara . ajaxo sought damages and certain non-monetary relief for the company 2019s alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement with ajaxo pertaining to certain wireless technology that ajaxo offered the company as well as damages and other relief against the company for their alleged misappropriation of ajaxo 2019s trade secrets . following a jury trial , a judgment was entered in 2003 in favor of ajaxo against the company for $ 1.3 million for breach of the ajaxo non-disclosure agreement . although the jury found in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets , the trial court subsequently denied ajaxo 2019s requests for additional damages and relief . on december 21 , 2005 , the california court of appeal affirmed the above-described award against the company for breach of the nondisclosure agreement but remanded the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of determining what , if any , additional damages ajaxo may be entitled to as a result of the jury 2019s previous finding in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets . although the company paid ajaxo the full amount due on the above-described judgment , the case was remanded back to the trial court , and on may 30 , 2008 , a jury returned a verdict in favor of the company denying all claims raised and demands for damages against the company . following the trial court 2019s filing of entry of judgment in favor of the company on september 5 , 2008 , ajaxo filed post-trial motions for vacating this entry of judgment and requesting a new trial . by order dated november 4 , 2008 , the trial court denied these motions . on december 2 , 2008 , ajaxo filed a notice of appeal with the court of appeal of the state of california for the sixth district . oral argument on the appeal was heard on july 15 , 2010 . on august 30 , 2010 , the court of appeal affirmed the trial court 2019s verdict in part and reversed the verdict in part , remanding the case . e*trade petitioned the supreme court of california for review of the court of appeal decision . on december 16 , 2010 , the california supreme court denied the company 2019s petition for review and remanded for further proceedings to the trial court . on september 20 , 2011 , the trial court granted limited discovery at a conference on november 4 , 2011 , and set a motion schedule and trial date . the trial will continue on may 14 , 2012 . the company will continue to defend itself vigorously . on october 2 , 2007 , a class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws was filed in the united states district court for the southern district of new york against the company and its then .\nQuestion: what is the portion of not leased in alpharetta , georgia?\nAnswer: 0.63462\nQuestion: what is the area of the facility in menlo park california?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "91000.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA280
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/9/2013</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american airlines group inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 175</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amex airline index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>152</td><td>127</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>114</td><td>113</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of american airlines stock over the 4 year period?\nAnswer: 75.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\nAnswer: 0.75\nQuestion: what was the change in value of the s&p 500 index over the 4 year period?\nAnswer: 27.0\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.27"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6788
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nholders of grupo gondi manage the joint venture and we provide technical and commercial resources . we believe the joint venture is helping us to grow our presence in the attractive mexican market . we have included the financial results of the joint venture in our corrugated packaging segment since the date of formation . we are accounting for the investment on the equity method . on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities in our consumer packaging segment since the date of the acquisition . on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in green power solutions of georgia , llc ( fffdgps fffd ) , which we consolidate . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . subsequent to the transaction , we announced the permanent closure of the newberg mill due to the decline in market conditions of the newsprint business and our need to balance supply and demand in our containerboard system . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities in our corrugated packaging segment since the date of the acquisition . see fffdnote 2 . mergers , acquisitions and investment fffdtt of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . see also item 1a . fffdrisk factors fffd fffdwe may be unsuccessful in making and integrating mergers , acquisitions and investments and completing divestitures fffd . business . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2018</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2017</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 16285.1</td><td>$ 14859.7</td><td>$ 14171.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment income</td><td>$ 1685.0</td><td>$ 1193.5</td><td>$ 1226.2</td></tr></table> in fiscal 2018 , we continued to pursue our strategy of offering differentiated paper and packaging solutions that help our customers win . we successfully executed this strategy in fiscal 2018 in a rapidly changing cost and price environment . net sales of $ 16285.1 million for fiscal 2018 increased $ 1425.4 million , or 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) , compared to fiscal 2017 . the increase was primarily a result of an increase in corrugated packaging segment sales , driven by higher selling price/mix and the contributions from acquisitions , and increased consumer packaging segment sales , primarily due to the contribution from acquisitions ( primarily the mps acquisition ) . these increases were partially offset by the absence of net sales from hh&b in fiscal 2018 due to the sale of hh&b in april 2017 and lower land and development segment sales compared to the prior year period due to the timing of real estate sales as we monetize the portfolio and lower merchandising display sales in the consumer packaging segment . segment income increased $ 491.5 million in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 , primarily due to increased corrugated packaging segment income . with respect to segment income , we experienced higher levels of cost inflation during fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017 , which was partially offset by recycled fiber deflation . the primary inflationary items were freight costs , chemical costs , virgin fiber costs and wage and other costs . productivity improvements in fiscal 2018 more than offset the net impact of cost inflation . while it is difficult to predict specific inflationary items , we expect higher cost inflation to continue through fiscal 2019 . our corrugated packaging segment increased its net sales by $ 695.1 million in fiscal 2018 to $ 9103.4 million from $ 8408.3 million in fiscal 2017 . the increase in net sales was primarily due to higher corrugated selling price/mix and higher corrugated volumes ( including acquisitions ) , which were partially offset by lower net sales from recycling operations due to lower recycled fiber costs , lower sales related to the deconsolidation of a foreign joint venture in fiscal 2017 and the impact of foreign currency . north american box shipments increased 4.1% ( 4.1 % ) on a per day basis in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 . segment income attributable to the corrugated packaging segment in fiscal 2018 increased $ 454.0 million to $ 1207.9 million compared to $ 753.9 million in fiscal 2017 . the increase was primarily due to higher selling price/mix , lower recycled fiber costs and productivity improvements which were partially offset by higher levels of cost inflation and other items , including increased depreciation and amortization . our consumer packaging segment increased its net sales by $ 838.9 million in fiscal 2018 to $ 7291.4 million from $ 6452.5 million in fiscal 2017 . the increase in net sales was primarily due to an increase in net sales from acquisitions ( primarily the mps acquisition ) and higher selling price/mix partially offset by the absence of net sales from hh&b in fiscal 2018 due to the hh&b sale in april 2017 and lower volumes . segment income attributable to .\nQuestion: what is the difference between the net sales of year ended september 30 2018 and the net sales increase of consumer packaging segment?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "8993.7"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4722
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .\nQuestion: what was the average crack spread for sweet/sour differential in 2009?\nAnswer: 5.82\nQuestion: and what was it in 2007?\nAnswer: 11.59\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-5.77"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4789
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>plant ( including nuclear fuel )</td><td>$ 727</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decommissioning trust funds</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>1020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power agreement ( below market )</td><td>420</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decommissioning liability</td><td>220</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>684</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 336</td></tr></table> subsequent to the closing , entergy received approximately $ 6 million from consumers energy company as part of the post-closing adjustment defined in the asset sale agreement . the post-closing adjustment amount resulted in an approximately $ 6 million reduction in plant and a corresponding reduction in other liabilities . for the ppa , which was at below-market prices at the time of the acquisition , non-utility nuclear will amortize a liability to revenue over the life of the agreement . the amount that will be amortized each period is based upon the difference between the present value calculated at the date of acquisition of each year's difference between revenue under the agreement and revenue based on estimated market prices . amounts amortized to revenue were $ 53 million in 2009 , $ 76 million in 2008 , and $ 50 million in 2007 . the amounts to be amortized to revenue for the next five years will be $ 46 million for 2010 , $ 43 million for 2011 , $ 17 million in 2012 , $ 18 million for 2013 , and $ 16 million for 2014 . nypa value sharing agreements non-utility nuclear's purchase of the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 plants from nypa included value sharing agreements with nypa . in october 2007 , non-utility nuclear and nypa amended and restated the value sharing agreements to clarify and amend certain provisions of the original terms . under the amended value sharing agreements , non-utility nuclear will make annual payments to nypa based on the generation output of the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants from january 2007 through december 2014 . non-utility nuclear will pay nypa $ 6.59 per mwh for power sold from indian point 3 , up to an annual cap of $ 48 million , and $ 3.91 per mwh for power sold from fitzpatrick , up to an annual cap of $ 24 million . the annual payment for each year's output is due by january 15 of the following year . non-utility nuclear will record its liability for payments to nypa as power is generated and sold by indian point 3 and fitzpatrick . an amount equal to the liability will be recorded to the plant asset account as contingent purchase price consideration for the plants . in 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , non-utility nuclear recorded $ 72 million as plant for generation during each of those years . this amount will be depreciated over the expected remaining useful life of the plants . in august 2008 , non-utility nuclear entered into a resolution of a dispute with nypa over the applicability of the value sharing agreements to its fitzpatrick and indian point 3 nuclear power plants after the planned spin-off of the non-utility nuclear business . under the resolution , non-utility nuclear agreed not to treat the separation as a \"cessation event\" that would terminate its obligation to make the payments under the value sharing agreements . as a result , after the spin-off transaction , enexus will continue to be obligated to make payments to nypa under the amended and restated value sharing agreements. .\nQuestion: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2009?\nAnswer: 53.0\nQuestion: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2008?\nAnswer: 76.0\nQuestion: what was the sum for 2008 and 2009?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "129.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2503
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfair value of the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired , was $ 17.7 million . goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of sigma-c 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations . virtio corporation , inc . ( virtio ) the company acquired virtio on may 15 , 2006 in an all-cash transaction . reasons for the acquisition . the company believes that its acquisition of virtio will expand its presence in electronic system level design . the company expects the combination of the company 2019s system studio solution with virtio 2019s virtual prototyping technology will help accelerate systems to market by giving software developers the ability to begin code development earlier than with prevailing methods . purchase price . the company paid $ 9.1 million in cash for the outstanding shares of virtio , of which $ 0.9 million was deposited with an escrow agent and which will be paid to the former stockholders of virtio pursuant to the terms of an escrow agreement . in addition , the company had a prior investment in virtio of approximately $ 1.7 million . the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 9076</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>prior investment in virtio</td><td>1664</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition-related costs</td><td>713</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 11453</td></tr></table> acquisition-related costs of $ 0.7 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees , estimated facilities closure costs and employee termination costs . as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 0.3 million of the acquisition-related costs . the $ 0.4 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 primarily consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs . under the agreement with virtio , the company has also agreed to pay up to $ 4.3 million over three years to the former stockholders based upon achievement of certain sales milestones . this contingent consideration is considered to be additional purchase price and will be an adjustment to goodwill when and if payment is made . additionally , the company has also agreed to pay $ 0.9 million in employee retention bonuses which will be recognized as compensation expense over the service period of the applicable employees . assets acquired . the company has performed a preliminary valuation and allocated the total purchase consideration to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets based on their respective fair values on the acquisition date . the company acquired $ 2.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 1.9 million in existing technology , $ 0.4 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in non-compete agreements to be amortized over five to seven years . additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 5.5 million and assumed liabilities of $ 3.2 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger , was $ 6.7 million . goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of virtio 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations . hpl technologies , inc . ( hpl ) the company acquired hpl on december 7 , 2005 in an all-cash transaction . reasons for the acquisition . the company believes that the acquisition of hpl will help solidify the company 2019s position as a leading electronic design automation vendor in design for manufacturing ( dfm ) .\nQuestion: what is the value of intangible assets acquired, in millions?\nAnswer: 2.5\nQuestion: what about in thousands?\nAnswer: 2500.0\nQuestion: what is the total purchase price?\nAnswer: 11453.0\nQuestion: what portion is related to intangible assets?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.21828"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2610
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united kingdom</td><td>$ 5951</td><td>$ 5531</td><td>$ 2696</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>4565</td><td>2014</td><td>1463</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>australia</td><td>3567</td><td>1519</td><td>1441</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>netherlands</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>992</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>germany</td><td>2944</td><td>2696</td><td>4217</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total cross-border outstandings</td><td>$ 17027</td><td>$ 9746</td><td>$ 10809</td></tr></table> the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 . aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) . capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives . regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors . we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements . our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt . the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies . the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board . both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 . state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .\nQuestion: what was the total of cross-border outstandings in the uk in 2007, in millions?\nAnswer: 5951.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2006, also in millions?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "5531.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA61
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 timing of available information , including the performance of first lien positions , and 2022 limitations of available historical data . pnc 2019s determination of the alll for non-impaired loans is sensitive to the risk grades assigned to commercial loans and loss rates for consumer loans . there are several other qualitative and quantitative factors considered in determining the alll . this sensitivity analysis does not necessarily reflect the nature and extent of future changes in the alll . it is intended to provide insight into the impact of adverse changes to risk grades and loss rates only and does not imply any expectation of future deterioration in the risk ratings or loss rates . given the current processes used , we believe the risk grades and loss rates currently assigned are appropriate . in the hypothetical event that the aggregate weighted average commercial loan risk grades would experience a 1% ( 1 % ) deterioration , assuming all other variables remain constant , the allowance for commercial loans would increase by approximately $ 35 million as of december 31 , 2014 . in the hypothetical event that consumer loss rates would increase by 10% ( 10 % ) , assuming all other variables remain constant , the allowance for consumer loans would increase by approximately $ 37 million at december 31 , 2014 . purchased impaired loans are initially recorded at fair value and applicable accounting guidance prohibits the carry over or creation of valuation allowances at acquisition . because the initial fair values of these loans already reflect a credit component , additional reserves are established when performance is expected to be worse than our expectations as of the acquisition date . at december 31 , 2014 , we had established reserves of $ .9 billion for purchased impaired loans . in addition , loans ( purchased impaired and non- impaired ) acquired after january 1 , 2009 were recorded at fair value . no allowance for loan losses was carried over and no allowance was created at the date of acquisition . see note 4 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . in determining the appropriateness of the alll , we make specific allocations to impaired loans and allocations to portfolios of commercial and consumer loans . we also allocate reserves to provide coverage for probable losses incurred in the portfolio at the balance sheet date based upon current market conditions , which may not be reflected in historical loss data . commercial lending is the largest category of credits and is sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments underlying the determination of the alll . we have allocated approximately $ 1.6 billion , or 47% ( 47 % ) , of the alll at december 31 , 2014 to the commercial lending category . consumer lending allocations are made based on historical loss experience adjusted for recent activity . approximately $ 1.7 billion , or 53% ( 53 % ) , of the alll at december 31 , 2014 has been allocated to these consumer lending categories . in addition to the alll , we maintain an allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . we report this allowance as a liability on our consolidated balance sheet . we maintain the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb estimated probable losses on these unfunded credit facilities . we determine this amount using estimates of the probability of the ultimate funding and losses related to those credit exposures . other than the estimation of the probability of funding , this methodology is very similar to the one we use for determining our alll . we refer you to note 1 accounting policies and note 3 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for further information on certain key asset quality indicators that we use to evaluate our portfolios and establish the allowances . table 41 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs ( a )</td><td>-531 ( 531 )</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>273</td><td>643</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3331</td><td>$ 3609</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.27% ( .27 % )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.63</td><td>1.84</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -55 ( 55 )</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs ( a )</td><td>-476 ( 476 )</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -531 ( 531 )</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.04% ( .04 % )</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>0.62</td><td>1.07</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 273 million for 2014 compared to $ 643 million for 2013 . the primary drivers of the decrease to the provision were improved overall credit quality , including lower consumer loan delinquencies , and the increasing value of residential real estate which resulted in greater expected cash flows from our purchased impaired loans . for 2014 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses increased by $ 64 million , or 178% ( 178 % ) , from 2013 primarily due to continued growth in the commercial book , paired with slowing of the reserve releases related to credit quality improvement . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 434 million , or 71% ( 71 % ) , from 2013 . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 81 .\nQuestion: what is the impact of total net charge-offs in the balance of allowance for loan and lease losses during 2014?\nAnswer: 531.0\nQuestion: what about the balance of allowance for loan and lease losses as of december 31, 2014?\nAnswer: 3609.0\nQuestion: what proportion is related to total net charge-offs?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.14713"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9345
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncertain reclassifications and format changes have been made to prior years 2019 amounts to conform to the 2015 presentation . b . investments . fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale , at market value , reflect unrealized appreciation and depreciation , as a result of temporary changes in market value during the period , in shareholders 2019 equity , net of income taxes in 201caccumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) 201d in the consolidated balance sheets . fixed maturity and equity securities carried at fair value reflect fair value re- measurements as net realized capital gains and losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company records changes in fair value for its fixed maturities available for sale , at market value through shareholders 2019 equity , net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) since cash flows from these investments will be primarily used to settle its reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense liabilities . the company anticipates holding these investments for an extended period as the cash flow from interest and maturities will fund the projected payout of these liabilities . fixed maturities carried at fair value represent a portfolio of convertible bond securities , which have characteristics similar to equity securities and at times , designated foreign denominated fixed maturity securities , which will be used to settle loss and loss adjustment reserves in the same currency . the company carries all of its equity securities at fair value except for mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are comprised of fixed maturity securities . for equity securities , available for sale , at fair value , the company reflects changes in value as net realized capital gains and losses since these securities may be sold in the near term depending on financial market conditions . interest income on all fixed maturities and dividend income on all equity securities are included as part of net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . unrealized losses on fixed maturities , which are deemed other-than-temporary and related to the credit quality of a security , are charged to net income ( loss ) as net realized capital losses . short-term investments are stated at cost , which approximates market value . realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of identified cost . for non- publicly traded securities , market prices are determined through the use of pricing models that evaluate securities relative to the u.s . treasury yield curve , taking into account the issue type , credit quality , and cash flow characteristics of each security . for publicly traded securities , market value is based on quoted market prices or valuation models that use observable market inputs . when a sector of the financial markets is inactive or illiquid , the company may use its own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value . retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities . each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield . the recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition . outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities . conditional prepayment rates , computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities , are used to effect the calculation of projected and prepayments for pass-through security types . other invested assets include limited partnerships and rabbi trusts . limited partnerships are accounted for under the equity method of accounting , which can be recorded on a monthly or quarterly lag . c . uncollectible receivable balances . the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances . such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reinsurance receivables and premium receivables</td><td>$ 22878</td><td>$ 29497</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2015?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-6619.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7786
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin particular , we have received commitments for $ 30.0 billion in debt financing to fund the transactions which is comprised of ( i ) a $ 4.0 billion secured revolving credit facility , ( ii ) a $ 7.0 billion term loan credit facility and ( iii ) a $ 19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility . our reliance on the financing from the $ 19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility commitment is intended to be reduced through one or more secured note offerings or other long-term financings prior to the merger closing . however , there can be no assurance that we will be able to issue any such secured notes or other long-term financings on terms we find acceptable or at all , especially in light of the recent debt market volatility , in which case we may have to exercise some or all of the commitments under the secured bridge facility to fund the transactions . accordingly , the costs of financing for the transactions may be higher than expected . credit rating downgrades could adversely affect the businesses , cash flows , financial condition and operating results of t-mobile and , following the transactions , the combined company . credit ratings impact the cost and availability of future borrowings , and , as a result , cost of capital . our current ratings reflect each rating agency 2019s opinion of our financial strength , operating performance and ability to meet our debt obligations or , following the completion of the transactions , obligations to the combined company 2019s obligors . each rating agency reviews these ratings periodically and there can be no assurance that such ratings will be maintained in the future . a downgrade in the rating of us and/or sprint could adversely affect the businesses , cash flows , financial condition and operating results of t- mobile and , following the transactions , the combined company . we have incurred , and will incur , direct and indirect costs as a result of the transactions . we have incurred , and will incur , substantial expenses in connection with and as a result of completing the transactions , and over a period of time following the completion of the transactions , the combined company also expects to incur substantial expenses in connection with integrating and coordinating our and sprint 2019s businesses , operations , policies and procedures . a portion of the transaction costs related to the transactions will be incurred regardless of whether the transactions are completed . while we have assumed that a certain level of transaction expenses will be incurred , factors beyond our control could affect the total amount or the timing of these expenses . many of the expenses that will be incurred , by their nature , are difficult to estimate accurately . these expenses will exceed the costs historically borne by us . these costs could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations prior to the transactions and the financial condition and results of operations of the combined company following the transactions . item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties as of december 31 , 2018 , our significant properties that we primarily lease and use in connection with switching centers , data centers , call centers and warehouses were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>approximate number</td><td>approximate size in square feet</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>switching centers</td><td>61</td><td>1300000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>data centers</td><td>6</td><td>500000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>call center</td><td>17</td><td>1300000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warehouses</td><td>21</td><td>500000</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2018 , we primarily leased : 2022 approximately 64000 macro towers and 21000 distributed antenna system and small cell sites . 2022 approximately 2200 t-mobile and metro by t-mobile retail locations , including stores and kiosks ranging in size from approximately 100 square feet to 17000 square feet . 2022 office space totaling approximately 1000000 square feet for our corporate headquarters in bellevue , washington . in january 2019 , we executed leases totaling approximately 170000 additional square feet for our corporate headquarters . we use these offices for engineering and administrative purposes . 2022 office space throughout the u.s. , totaling approximately 1700000 square feet , for use by our regional offices primarily for administrative , engineering and sales purposes. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2018, how much did the warehouse space represent in relation to the switching centers one, measured in square feet?\nAnswer: 2.6\nQuestion: and what was the average square feet for each of those 61 switching centers?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "21311.47541"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4230
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( 201cati 201d ) and spectrasite communications , llc ( 201cspectrasite 201d ) . we conduct our international operations through our subsidiary , american tower international , inc. , which in turn conducts operations through its various international operating subsidiaries . our international operations consist primarily of our operations in mexico and brazil , and also include operations in india , which we established in the second half of 2007 . we operate in two business segments : rental and management and network development services . for more information about our business segments , as well as financial information about the geographic areas in which we operate , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 201d and note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report . products and services rental and management our primary business is our communications site leasing business , which we conduct through our rental and management segment . this segment accounted for approximately 97% ( 97 % ) , 98% ( 98 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of our total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . our rental and management segment is comprised of our domestic and international site leasing business , including the operation of wireless communications towers , broadcast communications towers and das networks , as well as rooftop management . wireless communications towers.we are a leading owner and operator of wireless communications towers in the united states , mexico and brazil , based on number of towers and revenue . we also own and operate communications towers in india , where we commenced operations in the second half of 2007 . in addition to owned wireless communications towers , we also manage wireless communications sites for property owners in the united states , mexico and brazil . approximately 92% ( 92 % ) , 91% ( 91 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) of our rental and management segment revenue was attributable to our wireless communications towers for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2008 , our wireless communications tower portfolio included the following : country number of owned sites ( approx ) coverage area united states . . . . . . . . . . . 19400 coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors . mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas , including mexico city , monterrey , guadalajara and acapulco . brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil , including sao paulo , rio de janeiro , brasilia and curitiba . india . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) . we lease space on our wireless communications towers to customers in a diverse range of wireless industries , including personal communications services , cellular , enhanced specialized mobile radio , wimax . paging and fixed microwave . our major domestic wireless customers include at&t mobility , sprint nextel , verizon wireless ( which completed its merger with alltel in january 2009 ) and t-mobile usa . our major international wireless customers include grupo iusacell ( iusacell celular and unefon in mexico ) , nextel international in mexico and brazil , telefonica ( movistar in mexico and vivo in brazil ) , america movil ( telcel in mexico and claro in brazil ) and telecom italia mobile ( tim ) in brazil . for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>country</td><td>number of owned sites ( approx )</td><td>coverage area</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>19400</td><td>coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors .</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mexico</td><td>2500</td><td>coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas including mexico city monterrey guadalajara and acapulco .</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brazil</td><td>1100</td><td>coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil including sao paulo rio de janeiro brasilia and curitiba .</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>india</td><td>200</td><td>initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) .</td></tr></table> ( 201cati 201d ) and spectrasite communications , llc ( 201cspectrasite 201d ) . we conduct our international operations through our subsidiary , american tower international , inc. , which in turn conducts operations through its various international operating subsidiaries . our international operations consist primarily of our operations in mexico and brazil , and also include operations in india , which we established in the second half of 2007 . we operate in two business segments : rental and management and network development services . for more information about our business segments , as well as financial information about the geographic areas in which we operate , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 201d and note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report . products and services rental and management our primary business is our communications site leasing business , which we conduct through our rental and management segment . this segment accounted for approximately 97% ( 97 % ) , 98% ( 98 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of our total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . our rental and management segment is comprised of our domestic and international site leasing business , including the operation of wireless communications towers , broadcast communications towers and das networks , as well as rooftop management . wireless communications towers.we are a leading owner and operator of wireless communications towers in the united states , mexico and brazil , based on number of towers and revenue . we also own and operate communications towers in india , where we commenced operations in the second half of 2007 . in addition to owned wireless communications towers , we also manage wireless communications sites for property owners in the united states , mexico and brazil . approximately 92% ( 92 % ) , 91% ( 91 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) of our rental and management segment revenue was attributable to our wireless communications towers for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2008 , our wireless communications tower portfolio included the following : country number of owned sites ( approx ) coverage area united states . . . . . . . . . . . 19400 coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors . mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas , including mexico city , monterrey , guadalajara and acapulco . brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil , including sao paulo , rio de janeiro , brasilia and curitiba . india . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) . we lease space on our wireless communications towers to customers in a diverse range of wireless industries , including personal communications services , cellular , enhanced specialized mobile radio , wimax . paging and fixed microwave . our major domestic wireless customers include at&t mobility , sprint nextel , verizon wireless ( which completed its merger with alltel in january 2009 ) and t-mobile usa . our major international wireless customers include grupo iusacell ( iusacell celular and unefon in mexico ) , nextel international in mexico and brazil , telefonica ( movistar in mexico and vivo in brazil ) , america movil ( telcel in mexico and claro in brazil ) and telecom italia mobile ( tim ) in brazil . for the year ended december 31 .\nQuestion: what is the total number of owned sites in united states and mexico, combined?\nAnswer: 21900.0\nQuestion: including brazil, what would then be the total number of owned sites for the three countries?\nAnswer: 23000.0\nQuestion: and including india, what then becomes the total number of owned sites?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "23200.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6356
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of content part ii item 5 . market for the registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange under the trading symbol 201chfc . 201d in september 2018 , our board of directors approved a $ 1 billion share repurchase program , which replaced all existing share repurchase programs , authorizing us to repurchase common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions . the timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on market conditions and corporate , regulatory and other relevant considerations . this program may be discontinued at any time by the board of directors . the following table includes repurchases made under this program during the fourth quarter of 2018 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number ofshares purchased</td><td>average pricepaid per share</td><td>total number ofshares purchasedas part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>maximum dollarvalue of sharesthat may yet bepurchased under the plans or programs</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2018</td><td>1360987</td><td>$ 66.34</td><td>1360987</td><td>$ 859039458</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2018</td><td>450000</td><td>$ 61.36</td><td>450000</td><td>$ 831427985</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2018</td><td>912360</td><td>$ 53.93</td><td>810000</td><td>$ 787613605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total for october to december 2018</td><td>2723347</td><td>-</td><td>2620987</td><td>-</td></tr></table> during the quarter ended december 31 , 2018 , 102360 shares were withheld from certain executives and employees under the terms of our share-based compensation agreements to provide funds for the payment of payroll and income taxes due at vesting of restricted stock awards . as of february 13 , 2019 , we had approximately 97419 stockholders , including beneficial owners holding shares in street name . we intend to consider the declaration of a dividend on a quarterly basis , although there is no assurance as to future dividends since they are dependent upon future earnings , capital requirements , our financial condition and other factors. .\nQuestion: what percentage of the total of shares acquired in the last quarter of 2018 were purchased in december?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.33501"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4466
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin connection with our assessment of impairment we recorded gross other-than-temporary impairment of $ 1.15 billion for 2009 , compared to $ 122 million for 2008 . of the total recorded , $ 227 million related to credit and was recognized in our consolidated statement of income . the remaining $ 928 million related to factors other than credit , more fully discussed below , and was recognized , net of related taxes , in oci in our consolidated statement of condition . the $ 227 million was composed of $ 151 million associated with expected credit losses , $ 54 million related to management 2019s decision to sell the impaired securities prior to their recovery in value , and $ 22 million related to adverse changes in the timing of expected future cash flows from the securities . the majority of the impairment losses related to non-agency securities collateralized by mortgages , for which management concluded had experienced credit losses based on the present value of the securities 2019 expected future cash flows . these securities are classified as asset-backed securities in the foregoing investment securities tables . as described in note 1 , management periodically reviews the fair values of investment securities to determine if other-than-temporary impairment has occurred . this review encompasses all investment securities and includes such quantitative factors as current and expected future interest rates and the length of time that a security 2019s cost basis has exceeded its fair value , and includes investment securities for which we have issuer- specific concerns regardless of quantitative factors . gains and losses related to investment securities were as follows for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross gains from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ 418</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross losses from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross losses from other-than-temporary impairment</td><td>-1155 ( 1155 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>losses not related to credit ( 1 )</td><td>928</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net impairment losses</td><td>-227 ( 227 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gains ( losses ) related to investment securities net</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ -54 ( 54 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) these losses were recognized as a component of oci ; see note 12 . we conduct periodic reviews to evaluate each security that is impaired . impairment exists when the current fair value of an individual security is below its amortized cost basis . for debt securities available for sale and held to maturity , other-than-temporary impairment is recorded in our consolidated statement of income when management intends to sell ( or may be required to sell ) securities before they recover in value , or when management expects the present value of cash flows expected to be collected to be less than the amortized cost of the impaired security ( a credit loss ) . our review of impaired securities generally includes : 2022 the identification and evaluation of securities that have indications of possible other-than-temporary impairment , such as issuer-specific concerns including deteriorating financial condition or bankruptcy ; 2022 the analysis of expected future cash flows of securities , based on quantitative and qualitative factors ; 2022 the analysis of the collectability of those future cash flows , including information about past events , current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts ; 2022 the analysis of individual impaired securities , including consideration of the length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position and the anticipated recovery period ; 2022 the discussion of evidential matter , including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual securities to be deemed other-than-temporarily impaired and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment ; and 2022 documentation of the results of these analyses . factors considered in determining whether impairment is other than temporary include : 2022 the length of time the security has been impaired; .\nQuestion: what was the gross gains from sales of available for sale securities in 2009?\nAnswer: 418.0\nQuestion: and in 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "100.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3687
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2012 was $ 3.0 billion compared with $ 3.1 billion for 2011 . revenue growth of 8 percent and a decline in the provision for credit losses were more than offset by a 16 percent increase in noninterest expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . further detail is included in the net interest income , noninterest income , provision for credit losses and noninterest expense portions of this consolidated income statement review . net interest income table 2 : net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31dollars in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 9640</td><td>$ 8700</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.94% ( 3.94 % )</td><td>3.92% ( 3.92 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis and analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income in item 8 of this report and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion of purchased impaired loans in the consolidated balance sheet review in this item 7 for additional information . the increase in net interest income in 2012 compared with 2011 was primarily due to the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition , organic loan growth and lower funding costs . purchase accounting accretion remained stable at $ 1.1 billion in both periods . the net interest margin was 3.94% ( 3.94 % ) for 2012 and 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) for 2011 . the increase in the comparison was primarily due to a decrease in the weighted-average rate accrued on total interest- bearing liabilities of 29 basis points , largely offset by a 21 basis point decrease on the yield on total interest-earning assets . the decrease in the rate on interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to the runoff of maturing retail certificates of deposit and the redemption of additional trust preferred and hybrid capital securities during 2012 , in addition to an increase in fhlb borrowings and commercial paper as lower-cost funding sources . the decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets was primarily due to lower rates on new loan volume and lower yields on new securities in the current low rate environment . with respect to the first quarter of 2013 , we expect net interest income to decline by two to three percent compared to fourth quarter 2012 net interest income of $ 2.4 billion , due to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion of up to $ 50 to $ 60 million , including lower expected cash recoveries . for the full year 2013 , we expect net interest income to decrease compared with 2012 , assuming an expected decline in purchase accounting accretion of approximately $ 400 million , while core net interest income is expected to increase in the year-over-year comparison . we believe our net interest margin will come under pressure in 2013 , due to the expected decline in purchase accounting accretion and assuming that the current low rate environment continues . noninterest income noninterest income totaled $ 5.9 billion for 2012 and $ 5.6 billion for 2011 . the overall increase in the comparison was primarily due to an increase in residential mortgage loan sales revenue driven by higher loan origination volume , gains on sales of visa class b common shares and higher corporate service fees , largely offset by higher provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations . asset management revenue , including blackrock , totaled $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . this increase was primarily due to higher earnings from our blackrock investment . discretionary assets under management increased to $ 112 billion at december 31 , 2012 compared with $ 107 billion at december 31 , 2011 driven by stronger average equity markets , positive net flows and strong sales performance . for 2012 , consumer services fees were $ 1.1 billion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 . the decline reflected the regulatory impact of lower interchange fees on debit card transactions partially offset by customer growth . as further discussed in the retail banking portion of the business segments review section of this item 7 , the dodd-frank limits on interchange rates were effective october 1 , 2011 and had a negative impact on revenue of approximately $ 314 million in 2012 and $ 75 million in 2011 . this impact was partially offset by higher volumes of merchant , customer credit card and debit card transactions and the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition . corporate services revenue increased by $ .3 billion , or 30 percent , to $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ .9 billion in 2011 due to higher commercial mortgage servicing revenue and higher merger and acquisition advisory fees in 2012 . the major components of corporate services revenue are treasury management revenue , corporate finance fees , including revenue from capital markets-related products and services , and commercial mortgage servicing revenue , including commercial mortgage banking activities . see the product revenue portion of this consolidated income statement review for further detail . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 39 .\nQuestion: what is the net change in net interest income from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: 940.0\nQuestion: what is the net interest income in 2011?\nAnswer: 8700.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.10805\nQuestion: what is the negative impact on revenue from dodd-frank limits on interchange rates in 2012?\nAnswer: 314.0\nQuestion: what about in 2011?\nAnswer: 75.0\nQuestion: what is the total for these years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "389.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5439
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 23.4 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 6.0 million primarily due to higher net revenue and higher other income , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher interest expense . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 555.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 554.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 97 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in the residential and commercial sectors and a decrease in sales volume in the unbilled sales period . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to the addition in 2011 of transmission investments that are subject to equalization . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 57.5 million in gross wholesale revenues due to an increase in sales to affiliated customers , partially offset by a decrease of $ 26.9 million in power management rider revenue . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power. .\nQuestion: what is the increase in net income in 2011?\nAnswer: 23.4\nQuestion: what is the ratio of increase from 2011 to 2010?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "3.9"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10178
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and uncommitted lines of credit of certain subsidiaries . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 824.5 and $ 829.2 , respectively , the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to uncommitted lines of credit was $ 349.1 and $ 308.8 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees related to daylight overdrafts , primarily utilized to manage intra-day overdrafts due to timing of transactions under cash pooling arrangements without resulting in incremental borrowings , was $ 207.8 and $ 182.2 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 65.7</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>$ 23.6</td><td>$ 4.7</td><td>$ 10.2</td><td>$ 2.7</td><td>$ 126.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>30.1</td><td>30.6</td><td>42.9</td><td>5.7</td><td>3.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>115.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 95.8</td><td>$ 50.6</td><td>$ 66.5</td><td>$ 10.4</td><td>$ 13.7</td><td>$ 5.2</td><td>$ 242.2</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2018 . these estimated payments of $ 24.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2019 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2020 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value , in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 5 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities arising in the normal course of business . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company has been in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies , and that settlement was fully executed in april 2018 . the company has previously provided for such settlement in its consolidated financial statements. .\nQuestion: what was the change in redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates from 2021 to 2022?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "37.2"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7808
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin the fourth quarter of 2002 , aes lost voting control of one of the holding companies in the cemig ownership structure . this holding company indirectly owns the shares related to the cemig investment and indirectly holds the project financing debt related to cemig . as a result of the loss of voting control , aes stopped consolidating this holding company at december 31 , 2002 . other . during the fourth quarter of 2003 , the company sold its 25% ( 25 % ) ownership interest in medway power limited ( 2018 2018mpl 2019 2019 ) , a 688 mw natural gas-fired combined cycle facility located in the united kingdom , and aes medway operations limited ( 2018 2018aesmo 2019 2019 ) , the operating company for the facility , in an aggregate transaction valued at approximately a347 million ( $ 78 million ) . the sale resulted in a gain of $ 23 million which was recorded in continuing operations . mpl and aesmo were previously reported in the contract generation segment . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company sold its investment in empresa de infovias s.a . ( 2018 2018infovias 2019 2019 ) , a telecommunications company in brazil , for proceeds of $ 31 million to cemig , an affiliated company . the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc . the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company . during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india . the state of orissa appointed an administrator to take operational control of cesco . cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment . aes 2019s investment in cesco is negative . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas for approximately $ 40 million . the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 . songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell 100% ( 100 % ) of our ownership interest in songas . the sale of songas closed in april 2003 ( see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction ) . the following tables present summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) of the entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2003</td><td>2002 ( 1 )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 2758</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 6147</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1039</td><td>695</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>407</td><td>229</td><td>650</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>1347</td><td>1097</td><td>3700</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>7479</td><td>6751</td><td>14942</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>1434</td><td>1418</td><td>3510</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>3795</td><td>3349</td><td>8297</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>3597</td><td>3081</td><td>6835</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes information pertaining to eletropaulo and light prior to february 2002 . in 2002 and 2001 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 . the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) and 19% ( 19 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in operating income for entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method between 2002 and 2003\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "344.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10568
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following results drove changes in ccg operating income by approximately the amounts indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>operating income reconciliation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 10646</td><td>2016 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1250</td><td>lower ccg platform unit cost</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>905</td><td>lower ccg operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>625</td><td>higher gross margin from ccg platform revenue1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>-645 ( 645 )</td><td>higher factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 10nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>345</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 8166</td><td>2015 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>-2060 ( 2060 )</td><td>higher ccg platform unit costs</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>-1565 ( 1565 )</td><td>lower gross margin from ccg platform revenue2</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>435</td><td>lower factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 14nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>430</td><td>lower production costs primarily on our 14nm products treated as period charges in 2014</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>375</td><td>lower operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>224</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>$ 10327</td><td>2014 ccg operating income</td></tr></table> 1 higher gross margin from higher ccg platform revenue was driven by higher average selling prices on notebook and desktop platforms , offset by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales . 2 lower gross margin from lower ccg platform revenue was driven by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales , partially offset by higher average selling prices on desktop , notebook , and tablet platforms . data center group segment product overview the dcg operating segment offers platforms designed to provide leading energy-efficient performance for all server , network , and storage applications . in addition , dcg focuses on lowering the total cost of ownership on other specific workload- optimizations for the enterprise , cloud service providers , and communications service provider market segments . in 2016 , we launched the following platforms with an array of functionalities and advancements : 2022 intel ae xeon ae processor e5 v4 family , the foundation for high performing clouds and delivers energy-efficient performance for server , network , and storage workloads . 2022 intel xeon processor e7 v4 family , targeted at platforms requiring four or more cpus ; this processor family delivers high performance and is optimized for real-time analytics and in-memory computing , along with industry-leading reliability , availability , and serviceability . 2022 intel ae xeon phi 2122 product family , formerly code-named knights landing , with up to 72 high-performance intel processor cores , integrated memory and fabric , and a common software programming model with intel xeon processors . the intel xeon phi product family is designed for highly parallel compute and memory bandwidth-intensive workloads . intel xeon phi processors are positioned to increase the performance of supercomputers , enabling trillions of calculations per second , and to address emerging data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions . in 2017 , we expect to release our next generation of intel xeon processors for compute , storage , and network ; a next-generation intel xeon phi processor optimized for deep learning ; and a suite of single-socket products , including next-generation intel xeon e3 processors , next-generation intel atom processors , and next-generation intel xeon-d processors for dense solutions. .\nQuestion: what is the difference in ccg operating income between 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: -2161.0\nQuestion: and the specific amount for 2014 again?\nAnswer: 10327.0\nQuestion: so then what is the growth rate over these years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-0.20926"
}
] |
CONVFINQA938
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 93% ( 93 % ) and 89% ( 89 % ) as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ -26.3 ( 26.3 )</td><td>$ 26.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>-33.7 ( 33.7 )</td><td>34.7</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 . we had $ 1100.6 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2016 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2016 and 2015 , we had interest income of $ 20.1 and $ 22.8 , respectively . based on our 2016 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 11.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2016 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most impacted our results during 2016 included the british pound sterling and , to a lesser extent , the argentine peso , brazilian real and japanese yen . based on 2016 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2016 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures . we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .\nQuestion: what was the interest income in 2016?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "20.1"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3409
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrecourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loans sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s dus program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ 71</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loan sales</td><td>-</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 54</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions . as discussed in note 3 in this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and gnma , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors . our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with fha and va-insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of whole-loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to investors of sufficient investment quality . key aspects of such covenants and representations and warranties include the loan 2019s compliance with any applicable loan criteria established by the investor , including underwriting standards , delivery of all required loan documents to the investor or its designated party , sufficient collateral valuation , and the validity of the lien securing the loan . as a result of alleged breaches of these contractual obligations , investors may request pnc to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans . these investor indemnification or repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make- whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . indemnifications for loss or loan repurchases typically occur when , after review of the claim , we agree insufficient evidence exists to dispute the investor 2019s claim that a breach of a loan covenant and representation and warranty has occurred , such breach has not been cured , and the effect of such breach is deemed to have had a material and adverse effect on the value of the transferred loan . depending on the sale agreement and upon proper notice from the investor , we typically respond to such indemnification and repurchase requests within 60 days , although final resolution of the claim may take a longer period of time . with the exception of the sales the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 199 .\nQuestion: what is the balance of commercial mortgage recourse obligations in 2011?\nAnswer: 47.0\nQuestion: what about in 2010?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "54.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6642
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nas of may 26 , 2019 , we expect to pay approximately $ 2.0 million of unrecognized tax benefit liabilities and accrued interest within the next 12 months . we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future cash flows beyond 12 months due to uncertainties in the timing of tax audit outcomes . the remaining amount of our unrecognized tax liability was classified in other liabilities . we report accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefit liabilities in income tax expense . for fiscal 2019 , we recognized $ 0.5 million of tax-related net interest and penalties , and had $ 26.0 million of accrued interest and penalties as of may 26 , 2019 . for fiscal 2018 , we recognized a net benefit of $ 3.1 million of tax-related net interest and penalties , and had $ 27.3 million of accrued interest and penalties as of may 27 , 2018 . note 15 . leases , other commitments , and contingencies our leases are generally for warehouse space and equipment . rent expense under all operating leases from continuing operations was $ 184.9 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 189.4 million in fiscal 2018 , and $ 188.1 million in fiscal 2017 . some operating leases require payment of property taxes , insurance , and maintenance costs in addition to the rent payments . contingent and escalation rent in excess of minimum rent payments and sublease income netted in rent expense were insignificant . noncancelable future lease commitments are : in millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>operating leases</td><td>capital leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fiscal 2020</td><td>$ 120.0</td><td>$ 0.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fiscal 2021</td><td>101.7</td><td>0.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiscal 2022</td><td>85.0</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fiscal 2023</td><td>63.8</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fiscal 2024</td><td>49.1</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>after fiscal 2024</td><td>63.0</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total noncancelable future lease commitments</td><td>$ 482.6</td><td>$ 0.3</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : interest</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of obligations under capitalleases</td><td>-</td><td>$ 0.3</td></tr></table> depreciation on capital leases is recorded as depreciation expense in our results of operations . as of may 26 , 2019 , we have issued guarantees and comfort letters of $ 681.6 million for the debt and other obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , and guarantees and comfort letters of $ 133.9 million for the debt and other obligations of non-consolidated affiliates , mainly cpw . in addition , off-balance sheet arrangements are generally limited to the future payments under non-cancelable operating leases , which totaled $ 482.6 million as of may 26 , 2019 . note 16 . business segment and geographic information we operate in the packaged foods industry . our operating segments are as follows : north america retail ; convenience stores & foodservice ; europe & australia ; asia & latin america ; and pet . our north america retail operating segment reflects business with a wide variety of grocery stores , mass merchandisers , membership stores , natural food chains , drug , dollar and discount chains , and e-commerce grocery providers . our product categories in this business segment are ready-to-eat cereals , refrigerated yogurt , soup , meal kits , refrigerated and frozen dough products , dessert and baking mixes , frozen pizza and pizza snacks , grain , fruit and savory snacks , and a wide variety of organic products including refrigerated yogurt , nutrition bars , meal kits , salty snacks , ready-to-eat cereal , and grain snacks. .\nQuestion: in 2019, what was the rent expense for all operating leases from continuing operations?\nAnswer: 188.1\nQuestion: and what was it for 2018?\nAnswer: 189.4\nQuestion: what was, then, the total rent expense in both years, combined?\nAnswer: 377.5\nQuestion: and including the one from 2017, what becomes this total?\nAnswer: 562.4\nQuestion: and in that same year of 2019, what percentage did the noncancelable future lease commitments due in 2021 represent in relation to the total?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.21073"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2295
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 , and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 net sales to increase in 2014 in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in net sales from f-35 production contracts . operating profit is expected to increase slightly from 2013 , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between the years due to program mix . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions , and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8367</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>759</td><td>808</td><td>874</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8300</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 479 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of about $ 495 million due to decreased volume on various programs ( command and control programs for classified customers , ngi , and eram programs ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to the completion of certain programs ( such as total information processing support services , the transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) , and odin ) . the decrease was partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 340 million due to the start-up of certain programs ( such as the disa gsm-o and the national science foundation antarctic support ) . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 49 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 55 million due to certain programs nearing the end of their lifecycles , partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 15 million due to the start-up of certain programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were comparable for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford; .\nQuestion: what is the operating profit in 2013?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "759.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10851
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbusiness-related metrics as of or for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loan and lease receivables</td><td>$ 43.2</td><td>$ 37.4</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average loan and lease receivables</td><td>41.7</td><td>31.7</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automobile origination volume</td><td>27.8</td><td>25.3</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>automobile market share</td><td>6.1% ( 6.1 % )</td><td>5.7% ( 5.7 % )</td><td>40bp</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>30+ day delinquency rate</td><td>1.46</td><td>1.54</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net charge-off ratio</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.51</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>overhead ratio</td><td>35</td><td>36</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td></tr></table> crb is the no . 1 bank in the new york tri-state area and a top five bank in texas ( both ranked by retail deposits ) , providing payment , liquidity , investment , insurance and credit products and services to three primary customer segments : small busi- ness , affluent and retail . within these segments , crb serves 326000 small businesses , 433000 affluent consumers and 2.6 million mass-market consumers . crb 2019s continued focus on expanding customer relationships resulted in a 14% ( 14 % ) increase in core deposits ( for this purpose , core deposits are total deposits less time deposits ) from december 31 , 2002 , and a 77% ( 77 % ) increase in the cross-sell of chase credit products over 2002 . in 2003 , mortgage and home equity originations through crb 2019s distribution channels were $ 3.4 billion and $ 4.7 billion , respectively . branch-originated credit cards totaled 77000 , contributing to 23% ( 23 % ) of crb customers holding chase credit cards . crb is compensated by cfs 2019s credit businesses for the home finance and credit card loans it origi- nates and does not retain these balances . chase regional banking while crb continues to position itself for growth , decreased deposit spreads related to the low-rate environment and increased credit costs resulted in an 80% ( 80 % ) decline in crb operating earnings from 2002 . this decrease was partly offset by an 8% ( 8 % ) increase in total average deposits . operating revenue of $ 2.6 billion decreased by 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2002 . net interest income declined by 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 1.7 billion , primarily attributable to the lower interest rate environment . noninterest revenue decreased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 927 million due to lower deposit service fees , decreased debit card fees and one-time gains in 2002 . crb 2019s revenue does not include funding profits earned on its deposit base ; these amounts are included in the results of global treasury . operating expense of $ 2.4 billion increased by 7% ( 7 % ) from 2002 . the increase was primarily due to investments in technology within the branch network ; also contributing were higher compensation expenses related to increased staff levels and higher severance costs as a result of continued restructuring . this increase in operating caf is the largest u.s . bank originator of automobile loans and leases , with more than 2.9 million accounts . in 2003 , caf had a record number of automobile loan and lease originations , growing by 10% ( 10 % ) over 2002 to $ 27.8 billion . loan and lease receivables of $ 43.2 billion at december 31 , 2003 , were 16% ( 16 % ) higher than at the prior year-end . despite a challenging operating environment reflecting slightly declining new car sales in 2003 and increased competition , caf 2019s market share among automobile finance companies improved to 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) in 2003 from 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2002 . the increase in market share was the result of strong organic growth and an origination strategy that allies the business with manufac- turers and dealers . caf 2019s relationships with several major car manufacturers contributed to 2003 growth , as did caf 2019s dealer relationships , which increased from approximately 12700 dealers in 2002 to approximately 13700 dealers in 2003 . in 2003 , operating earnings were $ 205 million , 23% ( 23 % ) higher compared with 2002 . the increase in earnings was driven by continued revenue growth and improved operating efficiency . in 2003 , caf 2019s operating revenue grew by 23% ( 23 % ) to $ 842 million . net interest income grew by 33% ( 33 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase was driven by strong operating performance due to higher average loans and leases outstanding , reflecting continued strong origination volume and lower funding costs . operating expense of $ 292 million increased by 18% ( 18 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase in expenses was driven by higher average chase auto finance loans outstanding , higher origination volume and higher perform- ance-based incentives . caf 2019s overhead ratio improved from 36% ( 36 % ) in 2002 to 35% ( 35 % ) in 2003 , as a result of strong revenue growth , con- tinued productivity gains and disciplined expense management . credit costs increased 18% ( 18 % ) to $ 205 million , primarily reflecting a 32% ( 32 % ) increase in average loan and lease receivables . credit quality continued to be strong relative to 2002 , as evidenced by a lower net charge-off ratio and 30+ day delinquency rate . caf also comprises chase education finance , a top provider of government-guaranteed and private loans for higher education . loans are provided through a joint venture with sallie mae , a government-sponsored enterprise and the leader in funding and servicing education loans . chase education finance 2019s origination volume totaled $ 2.7 billion , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) from last year . management 2019s discussion and analysis j.p . morgan chase & co . 42 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report .\nQuestion: what is the operating earnings increase of 2003 compared with 2002 in percent?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.23"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3021
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.05</td><td>$ 97.04</td><td>$ 121.73</td><td>$ 161.39</td><td>$ 170.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj us containers & packaging</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 106.73</td><td>$ 66.91</td><td>$ 93.98</td><td>$ 110.23</td><td>$ 110.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 105.49</td><td>$ 66.46</td><td>$ 84.05</td><td>$ 96.71</td><td>$ 98.75</td></tr></table> copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .\nQuestion: what was the variation in the performance price of the ball corporation stock from 2006 to 2008?\nAnswer: -2.96\nQuestion: and what is this variation as a portion of that price in 2006?\nAnswer: -0.0296\nQuestion: in that same period, what was that variation for dj us containers & packaging?\nAnswer: -33.09\nQuestion: and how much does this variation represent in relation to the 2006 performance price of this stock?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-0.3309"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7131
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements six-month offering period . the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was $ 14.83 , $ 13.42 and $ 13.64 , respectively . at december 31 , 2014 , 3.4 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply the black-scholes pricing model for shares purchased through the espp for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.06% ( 0.06 % ) 2013 0.11% ( 0.11 % )</td><td>0.07% ( 0.07 % ) 2013 0.13% ( 0.13 % )</td><td>0.05% ( 0.05 % ) 2013 0.12% ( 0.12 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.09% ( 0.09 % )</td><td>0.10% ( 0.10 % )</td><td>0.08% ( 0.08 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price over the option period</td><td>11.29% ( 11.29 % ) 2013 16.59% ( 16.59 % )</td><td>12.21% ( 12.21 % ) 2013 13.57% ( 13.57 % )</td><td>33.16% ( 33.16 % ) 2013 33.86% ( 33.86 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>14.14% ( 14.14 % )</td><td>12.88% ( 12.88 % )</td><td>33.54% ( 33.54 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividend yield</td><td>1.50% ( 1.50 % )</td><td>1.50% ( 1.50 % )</td><td>1.50% ( 1.50 % )</td></tr></table> 16 . equity mandatory convertible preferred stock offering 2014on may 12 , 2014 , the company completed a registered public offering of 6000000 shares of its 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a , par value $ 0.01 per share ( the 201cmandatory convertible preferred stock 201d ) . the net proceeds of the offering were $ 582.9 million after deducting commissions and estimated expenses . the company used the net proceeds from this offering to fund acquisitions , including the acquisition from richland , initially funded by indebtedness incurred under the 2013 credit facility . unless converted earlier , each share of the mandatory convertible preferred stock will automatically convert on may 15 , 2017 , into between 0.9174 and 1.1468 shares of common stock , depending on the applicable market value of the common stock and subject to anti-dilution adjustments . subject to certain restrictions , at any time prior to may 15 , 2017 , holders of the mandatory convertible preferred stock may elect to convert all or a portion of their shares into common stock at the minimum conversion rate then in effect . dividends on shares of mandatory convertible preferred stock are payable on a cumulative basis when , as and if declared by the company 2019s board of directors ( or an authorized committee thereof ) at an annual rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) on the liquidation preference of $ 100.00 per share , on february 15 , may 15 , august 15 and november 15 of each year , commencing on august 15 , 2014 to , and including , may 15 , 2017 . the company may pay dividends in cash or , subject to certain limitations , in shares of common stock or any combination of cash and shares of common stock . the terms of the mandatory convertible preferred stock provide that , unless full cumulative dividends have been paid or set aside for payment on all outstanding mandatory convertible preferred stock for all prior dividend periods , no dividends may be declared or paid on common stock . stock repurchase program 2014in march 2011 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to purchase up to $ 1.5 billion of common stock ( 201c2011 buyback 201d ) . in september 2013 , the company temporarily suspended repurchases in connection with its acquisition of mipt . under the 2011 buyback , the company is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices in accordance with securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , the company .\nQuestion: what was the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options in 2013?\nAnswer: 13.42\nQuestion: what was the value in 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "13.64"
}
] |
CONVFINQA81
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis fully phased-in capital ratios the table below presents our estimated ratio of cet1 to rwas calculated under the basel iii advanced rules and the standardized capital rules on a fully phased-in basis. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>$ 73597</td><td>$ 71267</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets net of deferred tax liabilities</td><td>-3196 ( 3196 )</td><td>-3468 ( 3468 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions</td><td>-4928 ( 4928 )</td><td>-9091 ( 9091 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other adjustments</td><td>-1213 ( 1213 )</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cet1</td><td>$ 64260</td><td>$ 58219</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basel iii advanced rwas</td><td>$ 577869</td><td>$ 594662</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>basel iii advanced cet1 ratio</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>standardized rwas</td><td>$ 627444</td><td>$ 635092</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>standardized cet1 ratio</td><td>10.2% ( 10.2 % )</td><td>9.2% ( 9.2 % )</td></tr></table> although the fully phased-in capital ratios are not applicable until 2019 , we believe that the estimated ratios in the table above are meaningful because they are measures that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the estimated fully phased-in basel iii advanced and standardized cet1 ratios are non-gaap measures as of both december 2014 and december 2013 and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies ( as of those dates ) . these estimated ratios are based on our current interpretation , expectations and understanding of the revised capital framework and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for information about our transitional capital ratios , which represent our binding ratios as of december 2014 . in the table above : 2030 the deduction for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets , net of deferred tax liabilities , represents goodwill of $ 3.65 billion and $ 3.71 billion as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , and identifiable intangible assets of $ 515 million and $ 671 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , net of associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 964 million and $ 908 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively . 2030 the deduction for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions represents the amount by which our investments in the capital of nonconsolidated financial institutions exceed certain prescribed thresholds . the decrease from december 2013 to december 2014 primarily reflects reductions in our fund investments . 2030 other adjustments primarily include the overfunded portion of our defined benefit pension plan obligation , net of associated deferred tax liabilities , and disallowed deferred tax assets , credit valuation adjustments on derivative liabilities and debt valuation adjustments , as well as other required credit risk-based deductions . supplementary leverage ratio the revised capital framework introduces a new supplementary leverage ratio for advanced approach banking organizations . under amendments to the revised capital framework , the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies approved a final rule that implements the supplementary leverage ratio aligned with the definition of leverage established by the basel committee . the supplementary leverage ratio compares tier 1 capital to a measure of leverage exposure , defined as the sum of our quarterly average assets less certain deductions plus certain off-balance-sheet exposures , including a measure of derivatives exposures and commitments . the revised capital framework requires a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ( comprised of the minimum requirement of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) and a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) buffer ) for u.s . banks deemed to be g-sibs , effective on january 1 , 2018 . certain disclosures regarding the supplementary leverage ratio are required beginning in the first quarter of 2015 . as of december 2014 , our estimated supplementary leverage ratio was 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , including tier 1 capital on a fully phased-in basis of $ 73.17 billion ( cet1 of $ 64.26 billion plus perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock of $ 9.20 billion less other adjustments of $ 290 million ) divided by total leverage exposure of $ 1.45 trillion ( total quarterly average assets of $ 873 billion plus adjustments of $ 579 billion , primarily comprised of off-balance-sheet exposure related to derivatives and commitments ) . we believe that the estimated supplementary leverage ratio is meaningful because it is a measure that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the supplementary leverage ratio is a non-gaap measure and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies . this estimated supplementary leverage ratio is based on our current interpretation and understanding of the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies 2019 final rule and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . 60 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .\nQuestion: what is the net change in standardized rwas from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: -7648.0\nQuestion: what is the balance of standardized rwas in 2013?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "635092.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA142
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncredit facilities . as such , our foreign cash and cash equivalents are not expected to be a key source of liquidity to our domestic operations . at september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately $ 2.9 billion of availability under our committed credit facilities , primarily under our revolving credit facility , the majority of which matures on july 1 , 2022 . this liquidity may be used to provide for ongoing working capital needs and for other general corporate purposes , including acquisitions , dividends and stock repurchases . certain restrictive covenants govern our maximum availability under the credit facilities . we test and report our compliance with these covenants as required and we were in compliance with all of these covenants at september 30 , 2019 . at september 30 , 2019 , we had $ 129.8 million of outstanding letters of credit not drawn cash and cash equivalents were $ 151.6 million at september 30 , 2019 and $ 636.8 million at september 30 , 2018 . we used a significant portion of the cash and cash equivalents on hand at september 30 , 2018 in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition . primarily all of the cash and cash equivalents at september 30 , 2019 were held outside of the u.s . at september 30 , 2019 , total debt was $ 10063.4 million , $ 561.1 million of which was current . at september 30 , 2018 , total debt was $ 6415.2 million , $ 740.7 million of which was current . the increase in debt was primarily related to the kapstone acquisition . cash flow activity . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2019</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2310.2</td><td>$ 1931.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>$ -4579.6 ( 4579.6 )</td><td>$ -815.1 ( 815.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>$ 1780.2</td><td>$ -755.1 ( 755.1 )</td></tr></table> net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2019 increased $ 379.0 million from fiscal 2018 primarily due to higher cash earnings and a $ 340.3 million net decrease in the use of working capital compared to the prior year . as a result of the retrospective adoption of asu 2016-15 and asu 2016-18 ( each as hereinafter defined ) as discussed in 201cnote 1 . description of business and summary of significant accounting policies 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements , net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2018 was reduced by $ 489.7 million and cash provided by investing activities increased $ 483.8 million , primarily for the change in classification of proceeds received for beneficial interests obtained for transferring trade receivables in securitization transactions . net cash used for investing activities of $ 4579.6 million in fiscal 2019 consisted primarily of $ 3374.2 million for cash paid for the purchase of businesses , net of cash acquired ( excluding the assumption of debt ) , primarily related to the kapstone acquisition , and $ 1369.1 million for capital expenditures that were partially offset by $ 119.1 million of proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment primarily related to the sale of our atlanta beverage facility , $ 33.2 million of proceeds from corporate owned life insurance benefits and $ 25.5 million of proceeds from property , plant and equipment insurance proceeds related to the panama city , fl mill . net cash used for investing activities of $ 815.1 million in fiscal 2018 consisted primarily of $ 999.9 million for capital expenditures , $ 239.9 million for cash paid for the purchase of businesses , net of cash acquired primarily related to the plymouth acquisition and the schl fcter acquisition , and $ 108.0 million for an investment in grupo gondi . these investments were partially offset by $ 461.6 million of cash receipts on sold trade receivables as a result of the adoption of asu 2016-15 , $ 24.0 million of proceeds from the sale of certain affiliates as well as our solid waste management brokerage services business and $ 23.3 million of proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment . in fiscal 2019 , net cash provided by financing activities of $ 1780.2 million consisted primarily of a net increase in debt of $ 2314.6 million , primarily related to the kapstone acquisition and partially offset by cash dividends paid to stockholders of $ 467.9 million and purchases of common stock of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , net cash used for financing activities of $ 755.1 million consisted primarily of cash dividends paid to stockholders of $ 440.9 million and purchases of common stock of $ 195.1 million and net repayments of debt of $ 120.1 million. .\nQuestion: what was the sum of net cash provided by operating activities and used for investing in 2019?\nAnswer: -2269.4\nQuestion: was is the sum including cash from financing activities?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1780.2"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10233
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2013 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o 2019reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 150</td><td>$ 197</td><td>$ 216</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 268</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>110</td><td>137</td><td>143</td><td>184</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 121</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 136</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of s&p500 in 2017?\nAnswer: 145.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "100.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10845
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 26 of 100 our calculation of adjusted net earnings is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to ball corporation as reported</td><td>$ 468.0</td><td>$ 387.9</td><td>$ 319.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>74.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation activities net of tax</td><td>-9.3 ( 9.3 )</td><td>13.0</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gains and equity earnings related to acquisitions net of tax</td><td>-105.9 ( 105.9 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gain on dispositions net of tax</td><td>2212</td><td>-30.7 ( 30.7 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>debt refinancing costs net of tax</td><td>5.3</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>adjusted net earnings</td><td>$ 433.0</td><td>$ 372.4</td><td>$ 337.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>per diluted share from continuing operations as reported</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ 2.05</td><td>$ 1.62</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>per diluted share as adjusted</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.96</td><td>1.74</td></tr></table> debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2010 , increased $ 216.1 million to $ 2.8 billion from $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2009 . in december 2010 , ball replaced its senior credit facilities due october 2011 with new senior credit facilities due december 2015 . the senior credit facilities bear interest at variable rates and include a $ 200 million term a loan denominated in u.s . dollars , a a351 million term b loan denominated in british sterling and a 20ac100 million term c loan denominated in euros . the facilities also include ( 1 ) a multi-currency , long-term revolving credit facility that provides the company with up to approximately $ 850 million and ( 2 ) a french multi-currency revolving facility that provides the company with up to $ 150 million . the revolving credit facilities expire in december 2015 . in november 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 5.75 percent senior notes due in may 2021 . the net proceeds from this offering were used to repay the borrowings under our term d loan facility and for general corporate purposes . in march 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 6.75 percent senior notes due in september 2020 . on that same date , the company issued a notice of redemption to call $ 509 million in 6.875 percent senior notes due december 2012 at a redemption price of 101.146 percent of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest . the redemption of the bonds occurred on april 21 , 2010 , and resulted in a charge of $ 8.1 million for the call premium and the write off of unamortized financing costs and unamortized premiums . the charge is included in the 2010 statement of earnings as a component of interest expense . at december 31 , 2010 , approximately $ 976 million was available under the company 2019s committed multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company 2019s prc operations also had approximately $ 20 million available under a committed credit facility of approximately $ 52 million . in addition to the long-term committed credit facilities , the company had $ 372 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of 2010 , of which $ 76.2 million was outstanding and due on demand , as well as approximately $ 175 million of available borrowings under its accounts receivable securitization program . in october 2010 , the company renewed its receivables sales agreement for a period of one year . the size of the new program will vary between a maximum of $ 125 million for settlement dates in january through april and a maximum of $ 175 million for settlement dates in the remaining months . given our free cash flow projections and unused credit facilities that are available until december 2015 , our liquidity is strong and is expected to meet our ongoing operating cash flow and debt service requirements . while the recent financial and economic conditions have raised concerns about credit risk with counterparties to derivative transactions , the company mitigates its exposure by spreading the risk among various counterparties and limiting exposure to any one party . we also monitor the credit ratings of our suppliers , customers , lenders and counterparties on a regular basis . we were in compliance with all loan agreements at december 31 , 2010 , and all prior years presented , and have met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about our debt and receivables sales agreements are available in notes 12 and 6 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .\nQuestion: what was the change in per diluted share earnings as adjusted from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: 0.22\nQuestion: and what percentage did this change represent in relation to those earnings in 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.12644"
}
] |
CONVFINQA860
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nprovision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits</td><td>18</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in permanent reinvestment assertion</td><td>2014</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjustments to valuation allowances</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tax law changes</td><td>2014</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>effective income tax rate on continuing operations</td><td>74% ( 74 % )</td><td>61% ( 61 % )</td></tr></table> the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income . the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments . the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the \"corporate and other unallocated items\" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below . effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent . change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s . tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations . offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million . in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s . tax on previously undistributed earnings . adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s . benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes . discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the valuation allowances between 2011 and 2012?\nAnswer: 7.0\nQuestion: what was the value of allowances in 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "14.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA619
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ns c h e d u l e i v ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31 2008 2007 and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>direct amount</td><td>ceded to other companies</td><td>assumed from other companies</td><td>net amount</td><td>percentage of amount assumed to net</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 16087</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 3260</td><td>$ 13203</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 14673</td><td>$ 5834</td><td>$ 3458</td><td>$ 12297</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 13562</td><td>$ 5198</td><td>$ 3461</td><td>$ 11825</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net amount in 2008?\nAnswer: 13203.0\nQuestion: what was the net amount in 2007?\nAnswer: 12297.0\nQuestion: what was the change in value?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "906.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8519
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest increased $ 64 million , or 9.8% ( 9.8 % ) , to $ 710 million in 2013 from $ 646 million in 2012 primarily due to special charges of $ 92 million to recognize post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consists principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating income in 2012 consisted principally of a $ 280 million special credit related to the settlement of a commercial dispute partially offset by net foreign currency losses . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension and postretirement benefits</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -66 ( 66 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>1733</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td><td>1951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>170</td><td>67</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td><td>$ 2179</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify such financing or facility agreement and the debtors believed that it was probable the motion would be approved , and there was sufficient information to estimate the claim . see note 2 to american 2019s consolidated financial statements in part ii , item 8b for further information . ( 3 ) pursuant to the plan , the debtors agreed to allow certain post-petition unsecured claims on obligations . as a result , during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , american recorded reorganization charges to adjust estimated allowed claim amounts previously recorded on rejected special facility revenue bonds of $ 180 million , allowed general unsecured claims related to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at jfk , and rejected bonds that financed certain improvements at ord , which are included in the table above . ( 4 ) the plan allowed unsecured creditors receiving aag series a preferred stock a conversion discount of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) . accordingly , american recorded the fair value of such discount upon the confirmation of the plan by the bankruptcy court. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in aircraft and facility financing re-negotiations and rejections from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: -1631.0\nQuestion: what was the value of aircraft and facility financing re-negotiations and rejections in 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1951.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5824
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents ( 4 ) the increase in cash flows was primarily due to the timing of inventory purchases and longer payment terms with certain vendors . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>52</td><td>51</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-45 ( 45 )</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>19</td><td>19</td><td>21</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of accounts receivable , net at the end of the period , divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of sales for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of sales for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle was 19 days at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by higher net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as saas , software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the consolidated balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the consolidated statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . this also results in a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the consolidated balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sales in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle was 19 and 21 days at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the increase in dso was primarily driven by higher net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as saas , software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 15 million in 2017 compared to 2016 . capital expenditures increased $ 17 million to $ 81 million from $ 64 million for 2017 and 2016 , respectively , primarily related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities decreased $ 289 million in 2016 compared to 2015 . the decrease in cash used was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of cdw uk in 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures decreased $ 26 million to $ 64 million from $ 90 million for 2016 and 2015 , respectively , primarily due to spending for our new office location in 2015 . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 514 million in 2017 compared to 2016 . the increase was primarily driven by changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 228 million and by share repurchases during 2017 , which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 167 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see part ii , item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase in cash used for accounts payable-inventory financing was primarily driven by the termination of one of our inventory financing agreements in the fourth quarter of 2016 , with amounts .\nQuestion: what is the cash conversion cycle in 2015?\nAnswer: 21.0\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "19.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6997
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 130 the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib and consumer/cio positions for 2009 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 227 out of 261 days in this period , with 69 days exceeding $ 160 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence level var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . losses were sustained on 34 days during 2009 and exceeded the var measure on one day due to high market volatility in the first quarter of 2009 . under the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence interval , the firm would expect to incur daily losses greater than that pre- dicted by var estimates about twelve times a year . the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>$ 39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>$ 37</td></tr></table> loss advisories and drawdowns loss advisories and drawdowns are tools used to highlight to senior management trading losses above certain levels and initiate discus- sion of remedies . economic value stress testing while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in normal markets , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm conducts economic- value stress tests using multiple scenarios that assume credit spreads widen significantly , equity prices decline and significant changes in interest rates across the major currencies . other scenar- ios focus on the risks predominant in individual business segments and include scenarios that focus on the potential for adverse movements in complex portfolios . scenarios were updated more frequently in 2009 and , in some cases , redefined to reflect the signifi- cant market volatility which began in late 2008 . along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . stress testing enhances the understanding of the firm 2019s risk profile and loss potential , and stress losses are monitored against limits . stress testing is also utilized in one-off approvals and cross-business risk measurement , as well as an input to economic capital allocation . stress-test results , trends and explanations based on current market risk positions are reported to the firm 2019s senior management and to the lines of business to help them better measure and manage risks and to understand event risk 2013sensitive positions. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the credit spread from 2008 to 2009, in millions of dollars?\nAnswer: 2.0\nQuestion: and how much did that credit spread in 2009 represent in relation to the 2008 one?\nAnswer: 1.05405\nQuestion: what is the difference between this value and the number one?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.05405"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3946
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naverage age ( yrs. ) highway revenue equipment owned leased total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>highway revenue equipment</td><td>owned</td><td>leased</td><td>total</td><td>averageage ( yrs. )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>containers</td><td>26629</td><td>28306</td><td>54935</td><td>7.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>chassis</td><td>15182</td><td>25951</td><td>41133</td><td>8.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total highway revenue equipment</td><td>41811</td><td>54257</td><td>96068</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> capital expenditures our rail network requires significant annual capital investments for replacement , improvement , and expansion . these investments enhance safety , support the transportation needs of our customers , and improve our operational efficiency . additionally , we add new locomotives and freight cars to our fleet to replace older , less efficient equipment , to support growth and customer demand , and to reduce our impact on the environment through the acquisition of more fuel-efficient and low-emission locomotives . 2014 capital program 2013 during 2014 , our capital program totaled $ 4.1 billion . ( see the cash capital expenditures table in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 liquidity and capital resources 2013 financial condition , item 7. ) 2015 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , which will include expenditures for ptc of approximately $ 450 million and may include non-cash investments . we may revise our 2015 capital plan if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see discussion of our 2015 capital plan in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 2015 outlook , item 7. ) equipment encumbrances 2013 equipment with a carrying value of approximately $ 2.8 billion and $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively served as collateral for capital leases and other types of equipment obligations in accordance with the secured financing arrangements utilized to acquire or refinance such railroad equipment . as a result of the merger of missouri pacific railroad company ( mprr ) with and into uprr on january 1 , 1997 , and pursuant to the underlying indentures for the mprr mortgage bonds , uprr must maintain the same value of assets after the merger in order to comply with the security requirements of the mortgage bonds . as of the merger date , the value of the mprr assets that secured the mortgage bonds was approximately $ 6.0 billion . in accordance with the terms of the indentures , this collateral value must be maintained during the entire term of the mortgage bonds irrespective of the outstanding balance of such bonds . environmental matters 2013 certain of our properties are subject to federal , state , and local laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment . ( see discussion of environmental issues in business 2013 governmental and environmental regulation , item 1 , and management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 critical accounting policies 2013 environmental , item 7. ) item 3 . legal proceedings from time to time , we are involved in legal proceedings , claims , and litigation that occur in connection with our business . we routinely assess our liabilities and contingencies in connection with these matters based upon the latest available information and , when necessary , we seek input from our third-party advisors when making these assessments . consistent with sec rules and requirements , we describe below material pending legal proceedings ( other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business ) , material proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities , other proceedings arising under federal , state , or local environmental laws and regulations ( including governmental proceedings involving potential fines , penalties , or other monetary sanctions in excess of $ 100000 ) , and such other pending matters that we may determine to be appropriate. .\nQuestion: what was the total 2015 capital plan, in billions?\nAnswer: 4.3\nQuestion: and how much is that in millions?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "4300.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8070
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nproceeds from the sale of equity securities . from time to time , we raise funds through public offerings of our equity securities . in addition , we receive proceeds from sales of our equity securities pursuant to our stock option and stock purchase plans . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we received approximately $ 40.6 million in proceeds from sales of shares of our class a common stock and the common stock of atc mexico pursuant to our stock option and stock purchase plans . financing activities during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we took several actions to increase our financial flexibility and reduce our interest costs . new credit facility . in may 2004 , we refinanced our previous credit facility with a new $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility . at closing , we received $ 685.5 million of net proceeds from the borrowings under the new facility , after deducting related expenses and fees , approximately $ 670.0 million of which we used to repay principal and interest under the previous credit facility . we used the remaining net proceeds of $ 15.5 million for general corporate purposes , including the repurchase of other outstanding debt securities . the new credit facility consists of the following : 2022 $ 400.0 million in undrawn revolving loan commitments , against which approximately $ 19.3 million of undrawn letters of credit were outstanding at december 31 , 2004 , maturing on february 28 , 2011 ; 2022 a $ 300.0 million term loan a , which is fully drawn , maturing on february 28 , 2011 ; and 2022 a $ 398.0 million term loan b , which is fully drawn , maturing on august 31 , 2011 . the new credit facility extends the previous credit facility maturity dates from 2007 to 2011 for a majority of the borrowings outstanding , subject to earlier maturity upon the occurrence of certain events described below , and allows us to use credit facility borrowings and internally generated funds to repurchase other indebtedness without additional lender approval . the new credit facility is guaranteed by us and is secured by a pledge of substantially all of our assets . the maturity date for term loan a and any outstanding revolving loans will be accelerated to august 15 , 2008 , and the maturity date for term loan b will be accelerated to october 31 , 2008 , if ( 1 ) on or prior to august 1 , 2008 , our 93 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior notes have not been ( a ) refinanced with parent company indebtedness having a maturity date of february 28 , 2012 or later or with loans under the new credit facility , or ( b ) repaid , prepaid , redeemed , repurchased or otherwise retired , and ( 2 ) our consolidated leverage ratio ( total parent company debt to annualized operating cash flow ) at june 30 , 2008 is greater than 4.50 to 1.00 . if this were to occur , the payments due in 2008 for term loan a and term loan b would be $ 225.0 million and $ 386.0 million , respectively . note offerings . during 2004 , we raised approximately $ 1.1 billion in net proceeds from the sale of debt securities through institutional private placements as follows ( in millions ) : debt security date of offering principal amount approximate net proceeds . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>debt security</td><td>date of offering</td><td>principal amount</td><td>approximate net proceeds</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012</td><td>february 2004</td><td>$ 225.0</td><td>$ 221.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>3.00% ( 3.00 % ) convertible notes due august 15 2012</td><td>august 2004</td><td>345.0</td><td>335.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012</td><td>october 2004</td><td>300.0</td><td>292.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012</td><td>december 2004</td><td>200.0</td><td>199.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>-</td><td>$ 1070.0</td><td>$ 1050.2</td></tr></table> 2022 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes offering . in february 2004 , we sold $ 225.0 million principal amount of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 through an institutional private placement . the 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes mature on may 1 , 2012 , and interest is payable semiannually in arrears on may 1 and november 1 of each year. .\nQuestion: what is the principal amount for the 7.50% senior notes due 2012?\nAnswer: 225.0\nQuestion: what about the annual interest rate?\nAnswer: 0.075\nQuestion: what annual interest expense does this represent?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "16.875"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9029
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\na e s 2 0 0 0 f i n a n c i a l r e v i e w in may 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired an additional 5% ( 5 % ) of the preferred , non-voting shares of eletropaulo for approximately $ 90 million . in january 2000 , 59% ( 59 % ) of the preferred non-voting shares were acquired for approximately $ 1 billion at auction from bndes , the national development bank of brazil . the price established at auction was approximately $ 72.18 per 1000 shares , to be paid in four annual installments com- mencing with a payment of 18.5% ( 18.5 % ) of the total price upon closing of the transaction and installments of 25.9% ( 25.9 % ) , 27.1% ( 27.1 % ) and 28.5% ( 28.5 % ) of the total price to be paid annually thereafter . at december 31 , 2000 , the company had a total economic interest of 49.6% ( 49.6 % ) in eletropaulo . the company accounts for this investment using the equity method based on the related consortium agreement that allows the exercise of significant influence . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited for approxi- mately $ 40 million . songas limited owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . under the terms of a project management agreement , the company has assumed overall project management responsibility . the project consists of the refurbishment and operation of five natural gas wells in coastal tanzania , the construction and operation of a 65 mmscf/day gas processing plant and related facilities , the construction of a 230 km marine and land pipeline from the gas plant to dar es salaam and the conversion and upgrading of an existing 112 mw power station in dar es salaam to burn natural gas , with an optional additional unit to be constructed at the plant . since the project is currently under construction , no rev- enues or expenses have been incurred , and therefore no results are shown in the following table . in december 2000 , a subsidiary of the company with edf international s.a . ( 201cedf 201d ) completed the acquisition of an additional 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) interest in light from two sub- sidiaries of reliant energy for approximately $ 136 mil- lion . pursuant to the acquisition , the company acquired 30% ( 30 % ) of the shares while edf acquired the remainder . with the completion of this transaction , the company owns approximately 21.14% ( 21.14 % ) of light . in december 2000 , a subsidiary of the company entered into an agreement with edf to jointly acquire an additional 9.2% ( 9.2 % ) interest in light , which is held by a sub- sidiary of companhia siderurgica nacional ( 201ccsn 201d ) . pursuant to this transaction , the company acquired an additional 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) interest in light for $ 114.6 million . this transaction closed in january 2001 . following the purchase of the light shares previously owned by csn , aes and edf will together be the con- trolling shareholders of light and eletropaulo . aes and edf have agreed that aes will eventually take operational control of eletropaulo and the telecom businesses of light and eletropaulo , while edf will eventually take opera- tional control of light and eletropaulo 2019s electric workshop business . aes and edf intend to continue to pursue a fur- ther rationalization of their ownership stakes in light and eletropaulo , the result of which aes would become the sole controlling shareholder of eletropaulo and edf would become the sole controlling shareholder of light . upon consummation of the transaction , aes will begin consolidating eletropaulo 2019s operating results . the struc- ture and process by which this rationalization may be effected , and the resulting timing , have yet to be deter- mined and will likely be subject to approval by various brazilian regulatory authorities and other third parties . as a result , there can be no assurance that this rationalization will take place . in may 1999 , a subsidiary of the company acquired subscription rights from the brazilian state-controlled eletrobras which allowed it to purchase preferred , non- voting shares in eletropaulo and common shares in light . the aggregate purchase price of the subscription rights and the underlying shares in light and eletropaulo was approximately $ 53 million and $ 77 million , respectively , and represented 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) economic ownership interest in their capital stock , respectively . the following table presents summarized financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2000</td><td>1999</td><td>1998</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 6241</td><td>$ 5960</td><td>$ 8091</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1989</td><td>1839</td><td>2079</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>859</td><td>62</td><td>1146</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>2423</td><td>2259</td><td>2712</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>13080</td><td>15359</td><td>19025</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>3370</td><td>3637</td><td>4809</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>5927</td><td>7536</td><td>7356</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>6206</td><td>6445</td><td>9572</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the net change in revenue from 1998 to 1999?\nAnswer: -2131.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-0.26338"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4446
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements minority partner approves the annual budget , receives a detailed monthly reporting package from us , meets with us on a quarterly basis to review the results of the joint venture , reviews and approves the joint venture 2019s tax return before filing , and approves all leases that cover more than a nominal amount of space relative to the total rentable space at each property we do not consolidate the joint venture as we consider these to be substantive participation rights . our joint venture agreements also contain certain pro- tective rights such as the requirement of partner approval to sell , finance or refinance the property and the payment of capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan . the table below provides general information on each joint venture as of december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) : property partner ownership interest economic interest square feet acquired acquisition price ( 1 ) 1221 avenue of the americas ( 2 ) rgii 45.00% ( 45.00 % ) 45.00% ( 45.00 % ) 2550 12/03 $ 1000000 1515 broadway ( 3 ) sitq 55.00% ( 55.00 % ) 68.45% ( 68.45 % ) 1750 05/02 $ 483500 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>property</td><td>partner</td><td>ownership interest</td><td>economic interest</td><td>square feet</td><td>acquired</td><td>acquisition price ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1221 avenue of the americas ( 2 )</td><td>rgii</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>2550</td><td>12/03</td><td>$ 1000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1515 broadway ( 3 )</td><td>sitq</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>68.45% ( 68.45 % )</td><td>1750</td><td>05/02</td><td>$ 483500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>100 park avenue</td><td>prudential</td><td>49.90% ( 49.90 % )</td><td>49.90% ( 49.90 % )</td><td>834</td><td>02/00</td><td>$ 95800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>379 west broadway</td><td>sutton</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>62</td><td>12/05</td><td>$ 19750</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>21 west 34thstreet ( 4 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>30</td><td>07/05</td><td>$ 22400</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>800 third avenue ( 5 )</td><td>private investors</td><td>42.95% ( 42.95 % )</td><td>42.95% ( 42.95 % )</td><td>526</td><td>12/06</td><td>$ 285000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>521 fifth avenue</td><td>cif</td><td>50.10% ( 50.10 % )</td><td>50.10% ( 50.10 % )</td><td>460</td><td>12/06</td><td>$ 240000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>one court square</td><td>jp morgan</td><td>30.00% ( 30.00 % )</td><td>30.00% ( 30.00 % )</td><td>1402</td><td>01/07</td><td>$ 533500</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>1604-1610 broadway ( 6 )</td><td>onyx/sutton</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>63.00% ( 63.00 % )</td><td>30</td><td>11/05</td><td>$ 4400</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1745 broadway ( 7 )</td><td>witkoff/sitq/lehman bros .</td><td>32.26% ( 32.26 % )</td><td>32.26% ( 32.26 % )</td><td>674</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 520000</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>1 and 2 jericho plaza</td><td>onyx/credit suisse</td><td>20.26% ( 20.26 % )</td><td>20.26% ( 20.26 % )</td><td>640</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 210000</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>2 herald square ( 8 )</td><td>gramercy</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>354</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 225000</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>885 third avenue ( 9 )</td><td>gramercy</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>607</td><td>07/07</td><td>$ 317000</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>16 court street</td><td>cif</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td><td>318</td><td>07/07</td><td>$ 107500</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>the meadows ( 10 )</td><td>onyx</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>582</td><td>09/07</td><td>$ 111500</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>388 and 390 greenwich street ( 11 )</td><td>sitq</td><td>50.60% ( 50.60 % )</td><td>50.60% ( 50.60 % )</td><td>2600</td><td>12/07</td><td>$ 1575000</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>27-29 west 34thstreet ( 12 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>41</td><td>01/06</td><td>$ 30000</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>1551-1555 broadway ( 13 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>10.00% ( 10.00 % )</td><td>10.00% ( 10.00 % )</td><td>26</td><td>07/05</td><td>$ 80100</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>717 fifth avenue ( 14 )</td><td>sutton/nakash</td><td>32.75% ( 32.75 % )</td><td>32.75% ( 32.75 % )</td><td>120</td><td>09/06</td><td>$ 251900</td></tr></table> the meadows ( 10 ) onyx 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 582 09/07 $ 111500 388 and 390 greenwich street ( 11 ) sitq 50.60% ( 50.60 % ) 50.60% ( 50.60 % ) 2600 12/07 $ 1575000 27 201329 west 34th street ( 12 ) sutton 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 41 01/06 $ 30000 1551 20131555 broadway ( 13 ) sutton 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) 26 07/05 $ 80100 717 fifth avenue ( 14 ) sutton/nakash 32.75% ( 32.75 % ) 32.75% ( 32.75 % ) 120 09/06 $ 251900 ( 1 ) acquisition price represents the actual or implied purchase price for the joint venture . ( 2 ) we acquired our interest from the mcgraw-hill companies , or mhc . mhc is a tenant at the property and accounted for approximately 14.7% ( 14.7 % ) of the property 2019s annualized rent at december 31 , 2009 . we do not manage this joint venture . ( 3 ) under a tax protection agreement established to protect the limited partners of the partnership that transferred 1515 broadway to the joint venture , the joint venture has agreed not to adversely affect the limited partners 2019 tax positions before december 2011 . one tenant , whose leases primarily ends in 2015 , represents approximately 77.4% ( 77.4 % ) of this joint venture 2019s annualized rent at december 31 , 2009 . ( 4 ) effective november 2006 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 5 ) we invested approximately $ 109.5 million in this asset through the origination of a loan secured by up to 47% ( 47 % ) of the interests in the property 2019s ownership , with an option to convert the loan to an equity interest . certain existing members have the right to re-acquire approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the property 2019s equity . these interests were re-acquired in december 2008 and reduced our interest to 42.95% ( 42.95 % ) ( 6 ) effective april 2007 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 7 ) we have the ability to syndicate our interest down to 14.79% ( 14.79 % ) . ( 8 ) we , along with gramercy , together as tenants-in-common , acquired a fee interest in 2 herald square . the fee interest is subject to a long-term operating lease . ( 9 ) we , along with gramercy , together as tenants-in-common , acquired a fee and leasehold interest in 885 third avenue . the fee and leasehold interests are subject to a long-term operating lease . ( 10 ) we , along with onyx acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) interest on a pro-rata basis in september 2009 . ( 11 ) the property is subject to a 13-year triple-net lease arrangement with a single tenant . ( 12 ) effective may 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 13 ) effective august 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the sale of 80% ( 80 % ) of our interest , the joint venture was no longer a vie . ( 14 ) effective september 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary. .\nQuestion: what is the acquisition price times 1000 for 1745 broadway?\nAnswer: 520000000.0\nQuestion: what is that divided by its economic interest?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1611903285.80285"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7052
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvolatility of capital markets or macroeconomic factors could adversely affect our business . changes in financial and capital markets , including market disruptions , limited liquidity , uncertainty regarding brexit , and interest rate volatility , including as a result of the use or discontinued use of certain benchmark rates such as libor , may increase the cost of financing as well as the risks of refinancing maturing debt . in addition , our borrowing costs can be affected by short and long-term ratings assigned by rating organizations . a decrease in these ratings could limit our access to capital markets and increase our borrowing costs , which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and operating results . some of our customers and counterparties are highly leveraged . consolidations in some of the industries in which our customers operate have created larger customers , some of which are highly leveraged and facing increased competition and continued credit market volatility . these factors have caused some customers to be less profitable , increasing our exposure to credit risk . a significant adverse change in the financial and/or credit position of a customer or counterparty could require us to assume greater credit risk relating to that customer or counterparty and could limit our ability to collect receivables . this could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and liquidity . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois . our co-headquarters are leased and house certain executive offices , our u.s . business units , and our administrative , finance , legal , and human resource functions . we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate . we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world . as of december 29 , 2018 , we operated 84 manufacturing and processing facilities . we own 81 and lease three of these facilities . our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 29 , 2018 was: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>owned</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>40</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>12</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rest of world</td><td>27</td><td>2</td></tr></table> we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs . we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products . in the fourth quarter of 2018 , we announced our plans to divest certain assets and operations , predominantly in canada and india , including one owned manufacturing facility in canada and one owned and one leased facility in india . see note 5 , acquisitions and divestitures , in item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , for additional information on these transactions . item 3 . legal proceedings . see note 18 , commitments and contingencies , in item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable . part ii item 5 . market for registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . our common stock is listed on nasdaq under the ticker symbol 201ckhc 201d . at june 5 , 2019 , there were approximately 49000 holders of record of our common stock . see equity and dividends in item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , for a discussion of cash dividends declared on our common stock. .\nQuestion: what was the number of facilities located in the rest of the world?\nAnswer: 29.0\nQuestion: and what was the total number of facilities?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "84.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA527
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncitigroup 2019s repurchases are primarily from government sponsored entities . the specific representations and warranties made by the company depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer . market conditions and credit-ratings agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions the company may agree to in loan sales . in the event of a breach of the representations and warranties , the company may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans ( generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest ) with the identified defects or indemnify ( 201cmake-whole 201d ) the investor or insurer . the company has recorded a repurchase reserve that is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . in the case of a repurchase , the company will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loans . the company 2019s representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage . however , contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach . in the case of a repurchase , the loan is typically considered a credit- impaired loan and accounted for under sop 03-3 , 201caccounting for certain loans and debt securities , acquired in a transfer 201d ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 , receivables 2014loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality ) . these repurchases have not had a material impact on nonperforming loan statistics , because credit-impaired purchased sop 03-3 loans are not included in nonaccrual loans . the company estimates its exposure to losses from its obligation to repurchase previously sold loans based on the probability of repurchase or make-whole and an estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole . this estimate is calculated separately by sales vintage ( i.e. , the year the loans were sold ) based on a combination of historical trends and forecasted repurchases and losses considering the : ( 1 ) trends in requests by investors for loan documentation packages to be reviewed ; ( 2 ) trends in recent repurchases and make-wholes ; ( 3 ) historical percentage of claims made as a percentage of loan documentation package requests ; ( 4 ) success rate in appealing claims ; ( 5 ) inventory of unresolved claims ; and ( 6 ) estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole , including the loss of principal , accrued interest , and foreclosure costs . the company does not change its estimation methodology by counterparty , but the historical experience and trends are considered when evaluating the overall reserve . the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim . during 2009 , loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased . in addition , our loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and recent experience . these factors contributed to a $ 493 million change in estimate for this reserve in 2009 . as indicated above , the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage . the majority of the repurchases in 2009 were from the 2006 and 2007 sales vintages , which also represent the vintages with the largest loss- given-repurchase . an insignificant percentage of 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006 , and this is expected to decrease , because those vintages are later in the credit cycle . although early in the credit cycle , the company has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2008 and 2009 vintages . in the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired sop 03-3 loan ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 ) , the difference between the loan 2019s fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve . payments to make the investor whole are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve . the provision for estimated probable losses arising from loan sales is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale , which is included in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . a liability for representations and warranties is estimated when the company sells loans and is updated quarterly . any subsequent adjustment to the provision is recorded in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . the activity in the repurchase reserve for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of the year</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for new sales</td><td>33</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in estimate</td><td>493</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>utilizations</td><td>-119 ( 119 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance end of the year</td><td>$ 482</td><td>$ 75</td></tr></table> goodwill goodwill represents an acquired company 2019s acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired . goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests , whereby goodwill is allocated to the company 2019s reporting units and an impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value . furthermore , on any business dispositions , goodwill is allocated to the business disposed of based on the ratio of the fair value of the business disposed of to the fair value of the reporting unit . intangible assets intangible assets 2014including core deposit intangibles , present value of future profits , purchased credit card relationships , other customer relationships , and other intangible assets , but excluding msrs 2014are amortized over their estimated useful lives . intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives , primarily certain asset management contracts and trade names , are not amortized and are subject to annual impairment tests . an impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value . for other intangible assets subject to amortization , an impairment is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset . other assets and other liabilities other assets include , among other items , loans held-for-sale , deferred tax assets , equity-method investments , interest and fees receivable , premises and equipment , end-user derivatives in a net receivable position , repossessed assets , and other receivables. .\nQuestion: what is the end year balance of the repurchase reserve in 2009?\nAnswer: 482.0\nQuestion: what about in 2008?\nAnswer: 75.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in these years?\nAnswer: 407.0\nQuestion: what is the end year balance of the repurchase reserve in 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "75.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA679
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2018 ppg annual report and form 10-k 59 other acquisitions in 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , the company completed several smaller business acquisitions . the total consideration paid for these acquisitions , net of cash acquired , debt assumed and other post closing adjustments , was $ 108 million , $ 74 million and $ 43 million , respectively . in january 2018 , ppg acquired procoatings , a leading architectural paint and coatings wholesaler located in the netherlands . procoatings , established in 2001 , distributes a large portfolio of well-known professional paint brands through its network of 23 multi-brand stores . the company employs nearly 100 people . the results of this business since the date of acquisition have been reported within the architectural coatings americas and asia pacific business within the performance coatings reportable segment . in january 2017 , ppg acquired certain assets of automotive refinish coatings company futian xinshi ( 201cfutian 201d ) , based in the guangdong province of china . futian distributes its products in china through a network of more than 200 distributors . in january 2017 , ppg completed the acquisition of deutek s.a. , a leading romanian paint and architectural coatings manufacturer , from the emerging europe accession fund . deutek , established in 1993 , manufactures and markets a large portfolio of well-known professional and consumer paint brands , including oskar and danke! . the company 2019s products are sold in more than 120 do-it-yourself stores and 3500 independent retail outlets in romania . divestitures glass segment in 2017 , ppg completed a multi-year strategic shift in the company's business portfolio , resulting in the exit of all glass operations which consisted of the global fiber glass business , ppg's ownership interest in two asian fiber glass joint ventures and the flat glass business . accordingly , the results of operations , including the gains on the divestitures , and cash flows have been recast as discontinued operations for all periods presented . ppg now has two reportable business segments . the net sales and income from discontinued operations related to the former glass segment for the three years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 217</td><td>$ 908</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income from operations</td><td>$ 21</td><td>$ 30</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gains on the divestitures of businesses</td><td>2014</td><td>343</td><td>421</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>5</td><td>140</td><td>202</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 233</td><td>$ 330</td></tr></table> during 2018 , ppg released $ 13 million of previously recorded accruals and contingencies established in conjunction with the divestitures of businesses within the former glass segment as a result of completed actions , new information and updated estimates . also during 2018 , ppg made a final payment of $ 20 million to vitro s.a.b . de c.v related to the transfer of certain pension obligations upon the sale of the former flat glass business . north american fiber glass business on september 1 , 2017 , ppg completed the sale of its north american fiber glass business to nippon electric glass co . ltd . ( 201cneg 201d ) . cash proceeds from the sale were $ 541 million , resulting in a pre-tax gain of $ 343 million , net of certain accruals and contingencies established in conjunction with the divestiture . ppg 2019s fiber glass operations included manufacturing facilities in chester , south carolina , and lexington and shelby , north carolina ; and administrative and research-and-development operations in shelby and in harmar , pennsylvania , near pittsburgh . the business , which employed more than 1000 people and had net sales of approximately $ 350 million in 2016 , supplies the transportation , energy , infrastructure and consumer markets . flat glass business in october 2016 , ppg completed the sale of its flat glass manufacturing and glass coatings operations to vitro s.a.b . de c.v . ppg received approximately $ 740 million in cash proceeds and recorded a pre-tax gain of $ 421 million on the sale . under the terms of the agreement , ppg divested its entire flat glass manufacturing and glass coatings operations , including production sites located in fresno , california ; salem , oregon ; carlisle , pennsylvania ; and wichita falls , texas ; four distribution/fabrication facilities located across canada ; and a research-and-development center located in harmar , pennsylvania . ppg 2019s flat glass business included approximately 1200 employees . the business manufactures glass that is fabricated into products used primarily in commercial and residential construction . notes to the consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what was the operating income return on sales in 2016?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "111.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8077
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrepublic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 11 . employee benefit plans stock-based compensation in february 2007 , our board of directors approved the 2007 stock incentive plan ( 2007 plan ) , and in may 2007 our shareholders ratified the 2007 plan . in march 2011 , our board of directors approved the amended and restated 2007 stock incentive plan , and in may 2011 our shareholders ratified the amended and restated 2007 stock incentive plan . in march 2013 , our board of directors approved the republic services , inc . amended and restated 2007 stock incentive plan ( the amended and restated plan ) , and in may 2013 our shareholders ratified the amended and restated plan . we currently have approximately 15.6 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the amended and restated plan . options granted under the 2007 plan and the amended and restated plan are non-qualified and are granted at a price equal to the fair market value of our common stock at the date of grant . generally , options granted have a term of seven to ten years from the date of grant , and vest in increments of 25% ( 25 % ) per year over a period of four years beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant . options granted to non-employee directors have a term of ten years and are fully vested at the grant date . in december 2008 , the board of directors amended and restated the republic services , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ( formerly known as the allied waste industries , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ) ( the 2006 plan ) . allied 2019s shareholders approved the 2006 plan in may 2006 . the 2006 plan was amended and restated in december 2008 to reflect republic as the new sponsor of the plan , to reflect that any references to shares of common stock are to shares of common stock of republic , and to adjust outstanding awards and the number of shares available under the plan to reflect the allied acquisition . the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provided for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards . awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the allied acquisition . no further awards will be made under the 2006 stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for 2014 and 2013 ) and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . we did not grant stock options during the year ended december 31 , 2015 . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 5.74 and $ 5.27 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>27.5% ( 27.5 % )</td><td>28.9% ( 28.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7.0</td><td>7.0</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the difference in expected volatility between 2013 and 2014?\nAnswer: -1.4\nQuestion: and the value for 2013 specifically?\nAnswer: 28.9\nQuestion: and the percentage decline during this time?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-0.04844"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2578
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n$ 25.7 million in cash , including $ 4.2 million in taxes and 1373609 of hep 2019s common units having a fair value of $ 53.5 million . roadrunner / beeson pipelines transaction also on december 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our two newly constructed pipelines for $ 46.5 million , consisting of a 65- mile , 16-inch crude oil pipeline ( the 201croadrunner pipeline 201d ) that connects our navajo refinery lovington facility to a terminus of centurion pipeline l.p . 2019s pipeline extending between west texas and cushing , oklahoma and a 37- mile , 8-inch crude oil pipeline that connects hep 2019s new mexico crude oil gathering system to our navajo refinery lovington facility ( the 201cbeeson pipeline 201d ) . tulsa west loading racks transaction on august 1 , 2009 , hep acquired from us , certain truck and rail loading/unloading facilities located at our tulsa west facility for $ 17.5 million . the racks load refined products and lube oils produced at the tulsa west facility onto rail cars and/or tanker trucks . lovington-artesia pipeline transaction on june 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our newly constructed , 16-inch intermediate pipeline for $ 34.2 million that runs 65 miles from our navajo refinery 2019s crude oil distillation and vacuum facilities in lovington , new mexico to its petroleum refinery located in artesia , new mexico . slc pipeline joint venture interest on march 1 , 2009 , hep acquired a 25% ( 25 % ) joint venture interest in the slc pipeline , a new 95-mile intrastate pipeline system jointly owned with plains . the slc pipeline commenced operations effective march 2009 and allows various refineries in the salt lake city area , including our woods cross refinery , to ship crude oil into the salt lake city area from the utah terminus of the frontier pipeline as well as crude oil flowing from wyoming and utah via plains 2019 rocky mountain pipeline . hep 2019s capitalized joint venture contribution was $ 25.5 million . rio grande pipeline sale on december 1 , 2009 , hep sold its 70% ( 70 % ) interest in rio grande pipeline company ( 201crio grande 201d ) to a subsidiary of enterprise products partners lp for $ 35 million . results of operations of rio grande are presented in discontinued operations . in accounting for this sale , hep recorded a gain of $ 14.5 million and a receivable of $ 2.2 million representing its final distribution from rio grande . the recorded net asset balance of rio grande at december 1 , 2009 , was $ 22.7 million , consisting of cash of $ 3.1 million , $ 29.9 million in properties and equipment , net and $ 10.3 million in equity , representing bp , plc 2019s 30% ( 30 % ) noncontrolling interest . the following table provides income statement information related to hep 2019s discontinued operations : year ended december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>$ 5367</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-942 ( 942 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>4425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>14479</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-1978 ( 1978 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations net</td><td>12501</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>$ 16926</td></tr></table> transportation agreements hep serves our refineries under long-term pipeline and terminal , tankage and throughput agreements expiring in 2019 through 2026 . under these agreements , we pay hep fees to transport , store and throughput volumes of refined product and crude oil on hep 2019s pipeline and terminal , tankage and loading rack facilities that result in minimum annual payments to hep . under these agreements , the agreed upon tariff rates are subject to annual tariff rate adjustments on july 1 at a rate based upon the percentage change in producer price index ( 201cppi 201d ) or federal energy .\nQuestion: what is the value of cash?\nAnswer: 25.7\nQuestion: what is the value of taxes?\nAnswer: 4.2\nQuestion: what is the sum of cash and taxes?\nAnswer: 29.9\nQuestion: what is the total fair value less the sum of cash and taxes?\nAnswer: 23.6\nQuestion: what is that divided by hep?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "2e-05"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1550
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsolidated results of operations year ended december 31 , 2018 compared to year ended december 31 , 2017 net revenues increased $ 203.9 million , or 4.1% ( 4.1 % ) , to $ 5193.2 million in 2018 from $ 4989.2 million in 2017 . net revenues by product category are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2018</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apparel</td><td>$ 3462372</td><td>$ 3287121</td><td>$ 175251</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>footwear</td><td>1063175</td><td>1037840</td><td>25335</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accessories</td><td>422496</td><td>445838</td><td>-23342 ( 23342 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net sales</td><td>4948043</td><td>4770799</td><td>177244</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>license</td><td>124785</td><td>116575</td><td>8210</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>connected fitness</td><td>120357</td><td>101870</td><td>18487</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 5193185</td><td>$ 4989244</td><td>$ 203941</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td></tr></table> the increase in net sales was driven primarily by : 2022 apparel unit sales growth driven by the train category ; and 2022 footwear unit sales growth , led by the run category . the increase was partially offset by unit sales decline in accessories . license revenues increased $ 8.2 million , or 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) , to $ 124.8 million in 2018 from $ 116.6 million in 2017 . connected fitness revenue increased $ 18.5 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , to $ 120.4 million in 2018 from $ 101.9 million in 2017 primarily driven by increased subscribers on our fitness applications . gross profit increased $ 89.1 million to $ 2340.5 million in 2018 from $ 2251.4 million in 2017 . gross profit as a percentage of net revenues , or gross margin , was unchanged at 45.1% ( 45.1 % ) in 2018 compared to 2017 . gross profit percentage was favorably impacted by lower promotional activity , improvements in product cost , lower air freight , higher proportion of international and connected fitness revenue and changes in foreign currency ; these favorable impacts were offset by channel mix including higher sales to our off-price channel and restructuring related charges . with the exception of improvements in product input costs and air freight improvements , we do not expect these trends to have a material impact on the full year 2019 . selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 82.8 million to $ 2182.3 million in 2018 from $ 2099.5 million in 2017 . as a percentage of net revenues , selling , general and administrative expenses decreased slightly to 42.0% ( 42.0 % ) in 2018 from 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) in 2017 . selling , general and administrative expense was impacted by the following : 2022 marketing costs decreased $ 21.3 million to $ 543.8 million in 2018 from $ 565.1 million in 2017 . this decrease was primarily due to restructuring efforts , resulting in lower compensation and contractual sports marketing . this decrease was partially offset by higher costs in connection with brand marketing campaigns and increased marketing investments with the growth of our international business . as a percentage of net revenues , marketing costs decreased to 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) in 2018 from 11.3% ( 11.3 % ) in 2017 . 2022 other costs increased $ 104.1 million to $ 1638.5 million in 2018 from $ 1534.4 million in 2017 . this increase was primarily due to higher incentive compensation expense and higher costs incurred for the continued expansion of our direct to consumer distribution channel and international business . as a percentage of net revenues , other costs increased to 31.6% ( 31.6 % ) in 2018 from 30.8% ( 30.8 % ) in 2017 . restructuring and impairment charges increased $ 59.1 million to $ 183.1 million from $ 124.0 million in 2017 . refer to the restructuring plans section above for a summary of charges . income ( loss ) from operations decreased $ 52.8 million , or 189.9% ( 189.9 % ) , to a loss of $ 25.0 million in 2018 from income of $ 27.8 million in 2017 . as a percentage of net revenues , income from operations decreased to a loss of 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) in 2018 from income of 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) in 2017 . income from operations for the year ended december 31 , 2018 was negatively impacted by $ 203.9 million of restructuring , impairment and related charges in connection with the 2018 restructuring plan . income from operations for the year ended december 31 , 2017 was negatively impacted by $ 129.1 million of restructuring , impairment and related charges in connection with the 2017 restructuring plan . interest expense , net decreased $ 0.9 million to $ 33.6 million in 2018 from $ 34.5 million in 2017. .\nQuestion: what was the total net revenue for 2018?\nAnswer: 5193185.0\nQuestion: and converted to the thousands place?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "5193.185"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1094
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) mid cap 400 index and the russell 1000 index , both of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/11</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/12</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/13</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/14</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/15</td><td>12/31/16</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>a . o . smith corporation</td><td>100.0</td><td>159.5</td><td>275.8</td><td>292.0</td><td>401.0</td><td>501.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p mid cap 400 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>117.9</td><td>157.4</td><td>172.8</td><td>169.0</td><td>204.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>116.4</td><td>155.0</td><td>175.4</td><td>177.0</td><td>198.4</td></tr></table> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 smith ( a o ) corp s&p midcap 400 index russell 1000 index .\nQuestion: what was the a. o. smith corporation share price as of 12/31/16?\nAnswer: 501.4\nQuestion: and the change in price between 12/31/11 and this date?\nAnswer: 401.4\nQuestion: so what was the percentage return during this time?\nAnswer: 4.014\nQuestion: and the price for russell 1000 index as of 12/31/16?\nAnswer: 198.4\nQuestion: and the change in price from 12/31/11?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "98.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4008
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 101.76</td><td>$ 98.20</td><td>$ 78.76</td><td>$ 84.87</td><td>$ 110.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.79</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.82</td><td>$ 111.38</td><td>$ 87.52</td><td>$ 103.79</td><td>$ 131.59</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the value of an investment in ups in 2010?\nAnswer: 110.57\nQuestion: what is the change in the value from 2005 to 2010?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "10.57"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6009
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nresult of the effects of the costa concordia incident and the continued instability in the european eco- nomic landscape . however , we continue to believe in the long term growth potential of this market . we estimate that europe was served by 102 ships with approximately 108000 berths at the beginning of 2008 and by 117 ships with approximately 156000 berths at the end of 2012 . there are approximately 9 ships with an estimated 25000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2013 and 2017 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruise guests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 )</td><td>north american cruise guests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 )</td><td>european cruise guests</td><td>weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>20823000</td><td>425000</td><td>12044000</td><td>254000</td><td>6040000</td><td>152000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2008 through 2011 . year 2012 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : clia europe , formerly european cruise council , for years 2008 through 2011 . year 2012 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our princi- pal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consumers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influenced by political and general economic conditions . com- panies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : 2022 protect the health , safety and security of our guests and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , 2022 strengthen and support our human capital in order to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , 2022 further strengthen our consumer engagement in order to enhance our revenues , 2022 increase the awareness and market penetration of our brands globally , 2022 focus on cost efficiency , manage our operating expenditures and ensure adequate cash and liquid- ity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , 2022 strategically invest in our fleet through the revit ad alization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while prudently expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , 2022 capitalize on the portability and flexibility of our ships by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , 2022 further enhance our technological capabilities to service customer preferences and expectations in an innovative manner , while supporting our strategic focus on profitability , and part i 0494.indd 13 3/27/13 12:52 pm .\nQuestion: what was the total of global cruise guests in 2012?\nAnswer: 20823000.0\nQuestion: and what was that of 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "17184000.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9423
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy louisiana parishes in which it holds non-exclusive franchises . entergy louisiana's electric franchises expire during 2009-2036 . entergy mississippi has received from the mpsc certificates of public convenience and necessity to provide electric service to areas within 45 counties , including a number of municipalities , in western mississippi . under mississippi statutory law , such certificates are exclusive . entergy mississippi may continue to serve in such municipalities upon payment of a statutory franchise fee , regardless of whether an original municipal franchise is still in existence . entergy new orleans provides electric and gas service in the city of new orleans pursuant to city ordinances ( except electric service in algiers , which is provided by entergy louisiana ) . these ordinances contain a continuing option for the city of new orleans to purchase entergy new orleans' electric and gas utility properties . entergy texas holds a certificate of convenience and necessity from the puct to provide electric service to areas within approximately 24 counties in eastern texas , and holds non-exclusive franchises to provide electric service in approximately 65 incorporated municipalities . entergy texas typically is granted 50-year franchises . entergy texas' electric franchises expire during 2009-2045 . the business of system energy is limited to wholesale power sales . it has no distribution franchises . property and other generation resources generating stations the total capability of the generating stations owned and leased by the utility operating companies and system energy as of december 31 , 2008 , is indicated below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) total</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) gas/oil</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) nuclear</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) coal</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) hydro</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>4999</td><td>1883</td><td>1839</td><td>1207</td><td>70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy gulf states louisiana</td><td>3574</td><td>2240</td><td>971</td><td>363</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>5854</td><td>4685</td><td>1169</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>3224</td><td>2804</td><td>-</td><td>420</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>745</td><td>745</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>2543</td><td>2274</td><td>-</td><td>269</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>system energy</td><td>1139</td><td>-</td><td>1139</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>22078</td><td>14631</td><td>5118</td><td>2259</td><td>70</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) \"owned and leased capability\" is the dependable load carrying capability as demonstrated under actual operating conditions based on the primary fuel ( assuming no curtailments ) that each station was designed to utilize . the entergy system's load and capacity projections are reviewed periodically to assess the need and timing for additional generating capacity and interconnections . these reviews consider existing and projected demand , the availability and price of power , the location of new load , and the economy . summer peak load in the entergy system service territory has averaged 21039 mw from 2002-2008 . due to changing use patterns , peak load growth has nearly flattened while annual energy use continues to grow . in the 2002 time period , the entergy system's long-term capacity resources , allowing for an adequate reserve margin , were approximately 3000 mw less than the total capacity required for peak period demands . in this time period entergy met its capacity shortages almost entirely through short-term power purchases in the wholesale spot market . in the fall of 2002 , the entergy system began a program to add new resources to its existing generation portfolio and began a process of issuing .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2008, what portion of the total owned and leased capability was used by entergy arkansas?\nAnswer: 0.22642\nQuestion: and what percentage of it was due to nuclear?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.23181"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1163
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmeasurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>booking holdings inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>187.37</td><td>141.63</td><td>132.39</td><td>163.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>183.79</td><td>162.09</td><td>150.51</td><td>158.81</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>205.51</td><td>173.33</td><td>152.59</td><td>224.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>236.31</td><td>187.19</td><td>170.84</td><td>235.33</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017</td><td>280.10</td><td>242.29</td><td>208.14</td><td>338.52</td></tr></table> sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 . the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election . in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) . the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the \"act\" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .\nQuestion: what was the price of booking holdings inc. in 2017?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "280.1"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9731
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following discussion and analysis is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of welltower inc . for the periods presented and should be read together with the notes thereto contained in this annual report on form 10-k . other important factors are identified in 201citem 1 2014 business 201d and 201citem 1a 2014 risk factors 201d above . executive summary company overview welltower inc . ( nyse : hcn ) , an s&p 500 company headquartered in toledo , ohio , is driving the transformation of health care infrastructure . the company invests with leading seniors housing operators , post- acute providers and health systems to fund the real estate and infrastructure needed to scale innovative care delivery models and improve people 2019s wellness and overall health care experience . welltowertm , a real estate investment trust ( 201creit 201d ) , owns interests in properties concentrated in major , high-growth markets in the united states , canada and the united kingdom , consisting of seniors housing and post-acute communities and outpatient medical properties . our capital programs , when combined with comprehensive planning , development and property management services , make us a single-source solution for acquiring , planning , developing , managing , repositioning and monetizing real estate assets . the following table summarizes our consolidated portfolio for the year ended december 31 , 2016 ( dollars in thousands ) : type of property net operating income ( noi ) ( 1 ) percentage of number of properties . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type of property</td><td>net operating income ( noi ) ( 1 )</td><td>percentage of noi</td><td>number of properties</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>triple-net</td><td>$ 1208860</td><td>50.3% ( 50.3 % )</td><td>631</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>seniors housing operating</td><td>814114</td><td>33.9% ( 33.9 % )</td><td>420</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>outpatient medical</td><td>380264</td><td>15.8% ( 15.8 % )</td><td>262</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>totals</td><td>$ 2403238</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>1313</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) excludes our share of investments in unconsolidated entities and non-segment/corporate noi . entities in which we have a joint venture with a minority partner are shown at 100% ( 100 % ) of the joint venture amount . business strategy our primary objectives are to protect stockholder capital and enhance stockholder value . we seek to pay consistent cash dividends to stockholders and create opportunities to increase dividend payments to stockholders as a result of annual increases in net operating income and portfolio growth . to meet these objectives , we invest across the full spectrum of seniors housing and health care real estate and diversify our investment portfolio by property type , relationship and geographic location . substantially all of our revenues are derived from operating lease rentals , resident fees and services , and interest earned on outstanding loans receivable . these items represent our primary sources of liquidity to fund distributions and depend upon the continued ability of our obligors to make contractual rent and interest payments to us and the profitability of our operating properties . to the extent that our customers/partners experience operating difficulties and become unable to generate sufficient cash to make payments to us , there could be a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations , liquidity and/or financial condition . to mitigate this risk , we monitor our investments through a variety of methods determined by the type of property . our proactive and comprehensive asset management process for seniors housing properties generally includes review of monthly financial statements and other operating data for each property , review of obligor/ partner creditworthiness , property inspections , and review of covenant compliance relating to licensure , real estate taxes , letters of credit and other collateral . our internal property management division actively manages and monitors the outpatient medical portfolio with a comprehensive process including review of tenant relations , lease expirations , the mix of health service providers , hospital/health system relationships , property performance .\nQuestion: what was the number of properties related to outpatient medical?\nAnswer: 262.0\nQuestion: and what was the total number of properties?\nAnswer: 1313.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total, did the properties related to outpatient medical represent?\nAnswer: 0.19954\nQuestion: and how much did they represent as a portion of the total?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.19954"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6917
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmorgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) consumer price index ) . senior debt also may be structured to be callable by the company or extendible at the option of holders of the senior debt securities . debt containing provisions that effectively allow the holders to put or extend the notes aggregated $ 1175 million at december 31 , 2013 and $ 1131 million at december 31 , 2012 . in addition , separate agreements are entered into by the company 2019s subsidiaries that effectively allow the holders to put the notes aggregated $ 353 million at december 31 , 2013 and $ 1895 million at december 31 , 2012 . subordinated debt and junior subordinated debentures generally are issued to meet the capital requirements of the company or its regulated subsidiaries and primarily are u.s . dollar denominated . senior debt 2014structured borrowings . the company 2019s index-linked , equity-linked or credit-linked borrowings include various structured instruments whose payments and redemption values are linked to the performance of a specific index ( e.g. , standard & poor 2019s 500 ) , a basket of stocks , a specific equity security , a credit exposure or basket of credit exposures . to minimize the exposure resulting from movements in the underlying index , equity , credit or other position , the company has entered into various swap contracts and purchased options that effectively convert the borrowing costs into floating rates based upon libor . these instruments are included in the preceding table at their redemption values based on the performance of the underlying indices , baskets of stocks , or specific equity securities , credit or other position or index . the company carries either the entire structured borrowing at fair value or bifurcates the embedded derivative and carries it at fair value . the swaps and purchased options used to economically hedge the embedded features are derivatives and also are carried at fair value . changes in fair value related to the notes and economic hedges are reported in trading revenues . see note 4 for further information on structured borrowings . subordinated debt and junior subordinated debentures . included in the company 2019s long-term borrowings are subordinated notes of $ 9275 million having a contractual weighted average coupon of 4.69% ( 4.69 % ) at december 31 , 2013 and $ 5845 million having a weighted average coupon of 4.81% ( 4.81 % ) at december 31 , 2012 . junior subordinated debentures outstanding by the company were $ 4849 million at december 31 , 2013 and $ 4827 million at december 31 , 2012 having a contractual weighted average coupon of 6.37% ( 6.37 % ) at both december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 . maturities of the subordinated and junior subordinated notes range from 2014 to 2067 . maturities of certain junior subordinated debentures can be extended to 2052 at the company 2019s option . asset and liability management . in general , securities inventories that are not financed by secured funding sources and the majority of the company 2019s assets are financed with a combination of deposits , short-term funding , floating rate long-term debt or fixed rate long-term debt swapped to a floating rate . fixed assets are generally financed with fixed rate long-term debt . the company uses interest rate swaps to more closely match these borrowings to the duration , holding period and interest rate characteristics of the assets being funded and to manage interest rate risk . these swaps effectively convert certain of the company 2019s fixed rate borrowings into floating rate obligations . in addition , for non-u.s . dollar currency borrowings that are not used to fund assets in the same currency , the company has entered into currency swaps that effectively convert the borrowings into u.s . dollar obligations . the company 2019s use of swaps for asset and liability management affected its effective average borrowing rate as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average coupon of long-term borrowings at period-end ( 1 )</td><td>4.4% ( 4.4 % )</td><td>4.4% ( 4.4 % )</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effective average borrowing rate for long-term borrowings after swaps at period-end ( 1 )</td><td>2.2% ( 2.2 % )</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) included in the weighted average and effective average calculations are non-u.s . dollar interest rates . other . the company , through several of its subsidiaries , maintains funded and unfunded committed credit facilities to support various businesses , including the collateralized commercial and residential mortgage whole loan , derivative contracts , warehouse lending , emerging market loan , structured product , corporate loan , investment banking and prime brokerage businesses. .\nQuestion: what was the effect in difference of average borrowing rate due to the use of swaps in 2013?\nAnswer: 2.2\nQuestion: and in 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "2.1"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6756
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .\nQuestion: what was the cash used in investing activities in 2005?\nAnswer: 2047.0\nQuestion: and what was the one used in financing activities?\nAnswer: 752.0\nQuestion: how much, then, did the investing cash represent in relation to this financing one?\nAnswer: 2.72207\nQuestion: in that same year, what was the total debt?\nAnswer: 745.0\nQuestion: and what was it in the previous year?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "699.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2653
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars</td><td>total</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2010</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2011</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2012</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2013</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2014</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facilities [a]</td><td>$ 1900</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 1900</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>sale of receivables [b]</td><td>600</td><td>600</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>guarantees [c]</td><td>416</td><td>29</td><td>76</td><td>24</td><td>8</td><td>214</td><td>65</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit [d]</td><td>22</td><td>22</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total commercial commitments</td><td>$ 2938</td><td>$ 651</td><td>$ 76</td><td>$ 1924</td><td>$ 8</td><td>$ 214</td><td>$ 65</td></tr></table> [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 . [b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 . [c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . [d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 . off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc . ( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility . upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors . the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables . the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements . the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements . the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution . if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 . should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility . the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities . the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility . the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability . the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the value of the interest retained by upri in 2008 and the value of the undivided interest held by investors?\nAnswer: 1234.0\nQuestion: how much did the railroad collect in servicing fees in 2009?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "13.8"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6314
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in average crack spread for chicago between 2007 and 2009?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-5.35"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5373
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n3 . dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>subsidiaries</td><td>$ 807</td><td>$ 771</td><td>$ 1038</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>affiliates</td><td>43</td><td>44</td><td>21</td></tr></table> 4 . guarantees and letters of credit guarantees 2014in connection with certain of its project financing , acquisition , and power purchase agreements , the company has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments , most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events . these obligations and commitments , excluding those collateralized by letter of credit and other obligations discussed below , were limited as of december 31 , 2003 , by the terms of the agreements , to an aggregate of approximately $ 515 million representing 55 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 100 million . of this amount , $ 147 million represents credit enhancements for non-recourse debt , and $ 38 million commitments to fund its equity in projects currently under development or in construction . letters of credit 2014at december 31 , 2003 , the company had $ 89 million in letters of credit outstanding representing 9 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 36 million , which operate to guarantee performance relating to certain project development and construction activities and subsidiary operations . the company pays a letter of credit fee ranging from 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) to 5.00% ( 5.00 % ) per annum on the outstanding amounts . in addition , the company had $ 4 million in surety bonds outstanding at december 31 , 2003. .\nQuestion: what was the high end of the range of exposures for the outstanding letters of credit?\nAnswer: 36.0\nQuestion: what was the low end?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2576
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n$ 25.7 million in cash , including $ 4.2 million in taxes and 1373609 of hep 2019s common units having a fair value of $ 53.5 million . roadrunner / beeson pipelines transaction also on december 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our two newly constructed pipelines for $ 46.5 million , consisting of a 65- mile , 16-inch crude oil pipeline ( the 201croadrunner pipeline 201d ) that connects our navajo refinery lovington facility to a terminus of centurion pipeline l.p . 2019s pipeline extending between west texas and cushing , oklahoma and a 37- mile , 8-inch crude oil pipeline that connects hep 2019s new mexico crude oil gathering system to our navajo refinery lovington facility ( the 201cbeeson pipeline 201d ) . tulsa west loading racks transaction on august 1 , 2009 , hep acquired from us , certain truck and rail loading/unloading facilities located at our tulsa west facility for $ 17.5 million . the racks load refined products and lube oils produced at the tulsa west facility onto rail cars and/or tanker trucks . lovington-artesia pipeline transaction on june 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our newly constructed , 16-inch intermediate pipeline for $ 34.2 million that runs 65 miles from our navajo refinery 2019s crude oil distillation and vacuum facilities in lovington , new mexico to its petroleum refinery located in artesia , new mexico . slc pipeline joint venture interest on march 1 , 2009 , hep acquired a 25% ( 25 % ) joint venture interest in the slc pipeline , a new 95-mile intrastate pipeline system jointly owned with plains . the slc pipeline commenced operations effective march 2009 and allows various refineries in the salt lake city area , including our woods cross refinery , to ship crude oil into the salt lake city area from the utah terminus of the frontier pipeline as well as crude oil flowing from wyoming and utah via plains 2019 rocky mountain pipeline . hep 2019s capitalized joint venture contribution was $ 25.5 million . rio grande pipeline sale on december 1 , 2009 , hep sold its 70% ( 70 % ) interest in rio grande pipeline company ( 201crio grande 201d ) to a subsidiary of enterprise products partners lp for $ 35 million . results of operations of rio grande are presented in discontinued operations . in accounting for this sale , hep recorded a gain of $ 14.5 million and a receivable of $ 2.2 million representing its final distribution from rio grande . the recorded net asset balance of rio grande at december 1 , 2009 , was $ 22.7 million , consisting of cash of $ 3.1 million , $ 29.9 million in properties and equipment , net and $ 10.3 million in equity , representing bp , plc 2019s 30% ( 30 % ) noncontrolling interest . the following table provides income statement information related to hep 2019s discontinued operations : year ended december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>$ 5367</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-942 ( 942 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>4425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>14479</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-1978 ( 1978 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations net</td><td>12501</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>$ 16926</td></tr></table> transportation agreements hep serves our refineries under long-term pipeline and terminal , tankage and throughput agreements expiring in 2019 through 2026 . under these agreements , we pay hep fees to transport , store and throughput volumes of refined product and crude oil on hep 2019s pipeline and terminal , tankage and loading rack facilities that result in minimum annual payments to hep . under these agreements , the agreed upon tariff rates are subject to annual tariff rate adjustments on july 1 at a rate based upon the percentage change in producer price index ( 201cppi 201d ) or federal energy .\nQuestion: what is the value of cash?\nAnswer: 25.7\nQuestion: what is the value of taxes?\nAnswer: 4.2\nQuestion: what is the sum of cash and taxes?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "29.9"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8747
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 74 notes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . in 2002 , the corporation adopted fas 142 which prohibits the amortization of goodwill . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 973 million , $ 651 million after tax ( $ 1.50 per share ) . also includes a gain from the disposal of a business and charges for the corporation 2019s exit from its global telecommunications services business which is included in discontinued operations and which , on a combined basis , increased the net loss by $ 1 billion ( $ 2.38 per share ) . ( f ) the corporation defines return on invested capital ( roic ) as net income plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back the minimum pension liability . the adjustment to add back the minimum pension liability is a revision to our calculation in 2005 , which the corporation believes more closely links roic to management performance . further , the corporation believes that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively lockheed martin uses the capital invested in its operations . the corporation uses roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also uses roic as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isola- tion or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . the following calculations of roic reflect the revision to the calculation discussed above for all periods presented . ( in millions ) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 500</td><td>$ -1046 ( 1046 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td><td>378</td><td>455</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 878</td><td>$ -591 ( 591 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 7491</td><td>$ 8782</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td><td>6853</td><td>7221</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average minimum pension liability3 4 5</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td><td>341</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td><td>$ 14685</td><td>$ 16009</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>6.0% ( 6.0 % )</td><td>( 3.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments for other comprehensive losses , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability . 4 minimum pension liability values reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the caption 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual minimum pension liability adjustments to equity were : 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 million ) ; 2005 = ( $ 105 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the cur- rent year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter . lockheed martin corporation .\nQuestion: what is the net earnings in 2005?\nAnswer: 1825.0\nQuestion: what about in 2004?\nAnswer: 1266.0\nQuestion: what is the increase in net earnings?\nAnswer: 559.0\nQuestion: what is the net earnings in 2006?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1266.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8708
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity and capital resources we currently expect to fund all of our cash requirements which are reasonably foreseeable for 2018 , including scheduled debt repayments , new investments in the business , share repurchases , dividend payments , possible business acquisitions and pension contributions , with cash from operating activities , and as needed , additional short-term and/or long-term borrowings . we continue to expect our operating cash flow to remain strong . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 211 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand , of which $ 151 million was held outside of the as of december 31 , 2016 , we had $ 327 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand , of which $ 184 million was held outside of the u.s . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had $ 26 million of deferred tax liabilities for pre-acquisition foreign earnings associated with the legacy nalco entities and legacy champion entities that we intended to repatriate . these liabilities were recorded as part of the respective purchase price accounting of each transaction . the remaining foreign earnings were repatriated in 2016 , reducing the deferred tax liabilities to zero at december 31 , 2016 . as of december 31 , 2017 we had a $ 2.0 billion multi-year credit facility , which expires in november 2022 . the credit facility has been established with a diverse syndicate of banks . there were no borrowings under our credit facility as of december 31 , 2017 or 2016 . the credit facility supports our $ 2.0 billion u.s . commercial paper program and $ 2.0 billion european commercial paper program . combined borrowing under these two commercial paper programs may not exceed $ 2.0 billion . at year-end , we had no amount outstanding under the european commercial paper program and no amount outstanding under the u.s . commercial paper program . additionally , we have uncommitted credit lines of $ 660 million with major international banks and financial institutions to support our general global funding needs . most of these lines are used to support global cash pooling structures . approximately $ 643 million of these credit lines were available for use as of year-end 2017 . bank supported letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees total $ 198 million and represent commercial business transactions . we do not have any other significant unconditional purchase obligations or commercial commitments . as of december 31 , 2017 , our short-term borrowing program was rated a-2 by standard & poor 2019s and p-2 by moody 2019s . as of december 31 , 2017 , standard & poor 2019s and moody 2019s rated our long-term credit at a- ( stable outlook ) and baa1 ( stable outlook ) , respectively . a reduction in our credit ratings could limit or preclude our ability to issue commercial paper under our current programs , or could also adversely affect our ability to renew existing , or negotiate new , credit facilities in the future and could increase the cost of these facilities . should this occur , we could seek additional sources of funding , including issuing additional term notes or bonds . in addition , we have the ability , at our option , to draw upon our $ 2.0 billion of committed credit facility . we are in compliance with our debt covenants and other requirements of our credit agreements and indentures . a schedule of our various obligations as of december 31 , 2017 are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>total</td><td>payments due by period less than 1 year</td><td>payments due by period 2-3 years</td><td>payments due by period 4-5 years</td><td>payments due by period more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes payable</td><td>$ 15</td><td>$ 15</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>one-time transition tax</td><td>160</td><td>13</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>7303</td><td>549</td><td>696</td><td>1513</td><td>4545</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>5</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating leases</td><td>617</td><td>131</td><td>211</td><td>160</td><td>115</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest*</td><td>2753</td><td>242</td><td>436</td><td>375</td><td>1700</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 10853</td><td>$ 951</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 2075</td><td>$ 6457</td></tr></table> * interest on variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at year-end 2017 . during the fourth quarter of 2017 , we recorded a one-time transition tax related to enactment of the tax act . the expense is primarily related to the one-time transition tax , which is payable over eight years . as discussed further in note 12 , this balance is a provisional amount and is subject to adjustment during the measurement period of up to one year following the enactment of the tax act , as provided by recent sec guidance . as of december 31 , 2017 , our gross liability for uncertain tax positions was $ 68 million . we are not able to reasonably estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over an extended period of time or whether a cash settlement of the liability will be required . therefore , these amounts have been excluded from the schedule of contractual obligations. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in cash and cash equivalents on hand between 2016 and 2017?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-116.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2457
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 570</td><td>$ 1265</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2150</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>136</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2856</td><td>$ 2040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 . the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total notional amount of the company's derivatives from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: 816.0\nQuestion: and what was that amount in 2011?\nAnswer: 2040.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2011 amount, in percentage?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4285
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 466.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenue</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>attala costs</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr></table> the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in \"state and local rate regulation\" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .\nQuestion: what was the change in net revenue from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: 20.8\nQuestion: and what was that net revenue in 2006?\nAnswer: 466.1\nQuestion: how much, then, in percentage, does that change represent in relation to this 2006 net revenue?\nAnswer: 0.04463\nQuestion: what, again, was the variation in net revenue between the two years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "20.8"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8736
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncontracts and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement . shipping documents are used to verify delivery . the company assesses whether the selling price is fixed or determinable based upon the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment . the company assesses collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis , as well as the customer 2019s payment history . accruals for customer returns for defective product are based on historical experience with similar types of sales . accruals for rebates and incentives are based on pricing agreements and are generally tied to sales volume . changes in such accruals may be required if future returns differ from historical experience or if actual sales volume differ from estimated sales volume . rebates and incentives are recognized as a reduction of sales . compensated absences . in the fourth quarter of 2001 , the company changed its vacation policy for certain employees so that vacation pay is earned ratably throughout the year and must be used by year-end . the accrual for compensated absences was reduced by $ 1.6 million in 2001 to eliminate vacation pay no longer required to be accrued under the current policy . advertising . advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred and amounted to $ 18.4 , $ 16.2 and $ 8.8 million during 2003 , 2002 and 2001 respectively . research and development . research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred and amounted to $ 34.6 , $ 30.4 and $ 27.6 million during 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively . product warranty . the company 2019s products carry warranties that generally range from one to six years and are based on terms that are generally accepted in the market place . the company records a liability for the expected cost of warranty-related claims at the time of sale . the allocation of our warranty liability between current and long-term is based on expected warranty claims to be paid in the next year as determined by historical product failure rates . 1 . organization and significant accounting policies ( continued ) the following table presents the company 2019s product warranty liability activity in 2003 and 2002 : note to table : environmental costs . the company accrues for losses associated with environmental obligations when such losses are probable and reasonably estimable . costs of estimated future expenditures are not discounted to their present value . recoveries of environmental costs from other parties are recorded as assets when their receipt is considered probable . the accruals are adjusted as facts and circumstances change . stock based compensation . the company has one stock-based employee compensation plan ( see note 11 ) . sfas no . 123 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation , 201d encourages , but does not require companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value . the company has chosen to continue applying accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , 201caccounting for stock issued to employees , 201d and related interpretations , in accounting for its stock option plans . accordingly , because the number of shares is fixed and the exercise price of the stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant , no compensation expense has been recognized . had compensation cost been determined based upon the fair value at the grant date for awards under the plans based on the provisions of sfas no . 123 , the company 2019s pro forma earnings and earnings per share would have been as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( dollars in millions )</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 63.2</td><td>$ 69.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expense</td><td>29.1</td><td>29.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>claims settled</td><td>-30.2 ( 30.2 )</td><td>-29.1 ( 29.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>customer warranty waiver ( 1 )</td><td>--</td><td>-7.2 ( 7.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 62.1</td><td>$ 63.2</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for other concessions , the customer has agreed to accept responsibility for units they have purchased from the company which become defective . the amount of the warranty reserve applicable to the estimated number of units previously sold to this customer that may become defective has been reclassified from the product warranty liability to a deferred revenue account. .\nQuestion: what were research and developments costs in 2002?\nAnswer: 30.4\nQuestion: what were they in 2001?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "27.6"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8217
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2009 levels , we returned a portion of these assets to active service . at the end of 2010 , we continued to maintain in storage approximately 17% ( 17 % ) of our multiple purpose locomotives and 14% ( 14 % ) of our freight car inventory , reflecting our ability to effectively leverage our assets as volumes return to our network . 2022 fuel prices 2013 fuel prices generally increased throughout 2010 as the economy improved . our average diesel fuel price per gallon increased nearly 20% ( 20 % ) from january to december of 2010 , driven by higher crude oil barrel prices and conversion spreads . compared to 2009 , our diesel fuel price per gallon consumed increased 31% ( 31 % ) , driving operating expenses up by $ 566 million ( excluding any impact from year-over-year volume increases ) . to partially offset the effect of higher fuel prices , we reduced our consumption rate by 3% ( 3 % ) during the year , saving approximately 27 million gallons of fuel . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; increased use of distributed locomotive power ( the practice of distributing locomotives throughout a train rather than positioning them all in the lead resulting in safer and more efficient train operations ) ; fuel conservation programs ; and efficient network operations and asset utilization all contributed to this improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities ( adjusted for the reclassification of our receivables securitization facility ) totaled $ 4.5 billion , yielding record free cash flow of $ 1.4 billion in 2010 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities ( adjusted for the reclassification of our receivables securitization facility ) , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 4105</td><td>$ 3204</td><td>$ 4044</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables securitization facility [a]</td><td>400</td><td>184</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash provided by operating activitiesadjusted for the receivables securitizationfacility</td><td>4505</td><td>3388</td><td>4060</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2488 ( 2488 )</td><td>-2145 ( 2145 )</td><td>-2738 ( 2738 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-602 ( 602 )</td><td>-544 ( 544 )</td><td>-481 ( 481 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 1415</td><td>$ 699</td><td>$ 841</td></tr></table> [a] effective january 1 , 2010 , a new accounting standard required us to account for receivables transferred under our receivables securitization facility as secured borrowings in our consolidated statements of financial position and as financing activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows . the receivables securitization facility is included in our free cash flow calculation to adjust cash provided by operating activities as though our receivables securitization facility had been accounted for under the new accounting standard for all periods presented . 2011 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training , and engaging our employees . we will continue implementing total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc is designed to establish , maintain , reinforce , and promote safe practices among co-workers . this process allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . reducing grade crossing incidents is a critical aspect of our safety programs , and we will continue our efforts to maintain and close crossings ; install video cameras on locomotives ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , various industry programs , and engaging local communities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 to build upon our success in recent years , we will continue evaluating traffic flows and network logistic patterns , which can be quite dynamic , to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations , remove network variability , and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to adjust manpower and our locomotive and rail car fleets to meet customer needs and put .\nQuestion: in 2010, what was the amount from the cash provided by operations that was from receivables securitization facility?\nAnswer: 400.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of that cash provided by operations?\nAnswer: 4505.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total cash is from receivables securitization facility?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.08879"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1646
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntax benefits recognized for stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , were $ 16 million , $ 6 million and $ 5 million , respectively . the amount of northrop grumman shares issued before the spin-off to satisfy stock-based compensation awards are recorded by northrop grumman and , accordingly , are not reflected in hii 2019s consolidated financial statements . the company realized tax benefits during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , of $ 2 million from the exercise of stock options and $ 10 million from the issuance of stock in settlement of rpsrs and rsrs . unrecognized compensation expense at december 31 , 2011 there was $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years . in addition , at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 19 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rsrs , which will be recognized over a period of 2.2 years ; $ 10 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the rpsrs converted as part of the spin-off , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of one year ; and $ 18 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rpsrs which will be recognized over a period of 2.0 years . stock options the compensation expense for the outstanding converted stock options was determined at the time of grant by northrop grumman . there were no additional options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . the fair value of the stock option awards is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options . the fair value of each of the stock option award was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions : dividend yield 2014the dividend yield was based on northrop grumman 2019s historical dividend yield level . volatility 2014expected volatility was based on the average of the implied volatility from traded options and the historical volatility of northrop grumman 2019s stock . risk-free interest rate 2014the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the stock option award was based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon u.s . treasury bond on the date the award was granted with a maturity equal to the expected term of the award . expected term 2014the expected term of awards granted was derived from historical experience and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . a stratification of expected terms based on employee populations ( executive and non-executive ) was considered in the analysis . the following significant weighted-average assumptions were used to value stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.6% ( 3.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility rate</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option life ( years )</td><td>6</td><td>5 & 6</td></tr></table> the weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was $ 11 and $ 7 , per share , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the dividend yield for 2010?\nAnswer: 2.9\nQuestion: and for 2009?\nAnswer: 3.6\nQuestion: so what was the difference between these two values?\nAnswer: -0.7\nQuestion: and the value for 2009 again?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "3.6"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9432
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmillion excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .\nQuestion: what were asian industrial net packaging sales in 2013?\nAnswer: 400.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2012?\nAnswer: 400.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 800.0\nQuestion: what were the sales in 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "410.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA574
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n13 . rentals and leases the company leases sales and administrative office facilities , distribution centers , research and manufacturing facilities , as well as vehicles and other equipment under operating leases . total rental expense under the company 2019s operating leases was $ 239 million in 2017 and $ 221 million in both 2016 and 2015 . as of december 31 , 2017 , identifiable future minimum payments with non-cancelable terms in excess of one year were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 131</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>115</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 617</td></tr></table> the company enters into operating leases for vehicles whose non-cancelable terms are one year or less in duration with month-to-month renewal options . these leases have been excluded from the table above . the company estimates payments under such leases will approximate $ 62 million in 2018 . these vehicle leases have guaranteed residual values that have historically been satisfied by the proceeds on the sale of the vehicles . 14 . research and development expenditures research expenditures that relate to the development of new products and processes , including significant improvements and refinements to existing products , are expensed as incurred . such costs were $ 201 million in 2017 , $ 189 million in 2016 and $ 191 million in 2015 . the company did not participate in any material customer sponsored research during 2017 , 2016 or 2015 . 15 . commitments and contingencies the company is subject to various claims and contingencies related to , among other things , workers 2019 compensation , general liability ( including product liability ) , automobile claims , health care claims , environmental matters and lawsuits . the company is also subject to various claims and contingencies related to income taxes , which are discussed in note 12 . the company also has contractual obligations including lease commitments , which are discussed in note 13 . the company records liabilities where a contingent loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated . if the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range , the company records the most probable estimate of the loss or the minimum amount when no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount . the company discloses a contingent liability even if the liability is not probable or the amount is not estimable , or both , if there is a reasonable possibility that a material loss may have been incurred . insurance globally , the company has insurance policies with varying deductibility levels for property and casualty losses . the company is insured for losses in excess of these deductibles , subject to policy terms and conditions and has recorded both a liability and an offsetting receivable for amounts in excess of these deductibles . the company is self-insured for health care claims for eligible participating employees , subject to certain deductibles and limitations . the company determines its liabilities for claims on an actuarial basis . litigation and environmental matters the company and certain subsidiaries are party to various lawsuits , claims and environmental actions that have arisen in the ordinary course of business . these include from time to time antitrust , commercial , patent infringement , product liability and wage hour lawsuits , as well as possible obligations to investigate and mitigate the effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain chemical substances at various sites , such as superfund sites and other operating or closed facilities . the company has established accruals for certain lawsuits , claims and environmental matters . the company currently believes that there is not a reasonably possible risk of material loss in excess of the amounts accrued related to these legal matters . because litigation is inherently uncertain , and unfavorable rulings or developments could occur , there can be no certainty that the company may not ultimately incur charges in excess of recorded liabilities . a future adverse ruling , settlement or unfavorable development could result in future charges that could have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s results of operations or cash flows in the period in which they are recorded . the company currently believes that such future charges related to suits and legal claims , if any , would not have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position . environmental matters the company is currently participating in environmental assessments and remediation at approximately 45 locations , the majority of which are in the u.s. , and environmental liabilities have been accrued reflecting management 2019s best estimate of future costs . potential insurance reimbursements are not anticipated in the company 2019s accruals for environmental liabilities. .\nQuestion: what were the total r&e expenses in millions for 2017?\nAnswer: 201.0\nQuestion: and in 2016?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "189.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10605
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003 , aes issued an aggregated of 20.2 million shares of its common stock in exchange for $ 20 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes . the shares were issued without registration in reliance upon section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) under the securities act of 1933 . market information our common stock is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003 first quarter</td><td>high $ 4.04</td><td>low $ 2.72</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>8.37</td><td>3.75</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>7.70</td><td>5.91</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>9.50</td><td>7.57</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td></tr></table> holders as of march 3 , 2004 , there were 9026 record holders of our common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities , which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , we are not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , under the terms of a guaranty we provided to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project , we are precluded from paying cash dividends on our common stock if we do not meet certain net worth and liquidity tests . our project subsidiaries 2019 ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements that our project subsidiaries are subject to . see item 12 ( d ) of this form 10-k for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. .\nQuestion: combined, what was the high and low price for 2003 q1?\nAnswer: 6.76\nQuestion: and the average of these values?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "3.38"
}
] |
CONVFINQA65
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nlong-term product offerings include alpha-seeking active and index strategies . our alpha-seeking active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile , and leverage fundamental research and quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both alpha-seeking active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . net flows in institutional index products generally have a small impact on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2017 equity aum totaled $ 3.372 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 130.1 billion . net inflows included $ 174.4 billion into ishares etfs , driven by net inflows into core funds and broad developed and emerging market equities , partially offset by non-etf index and active net outflows of $ 25.7 billion and $ 18.5 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s equity revenues and effective fee rate . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2017 at $ 1.855 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 178.8 billion . in 2017 , active net inflows of $ 21.5 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows into municipal , unconstrained and total return bond funds . ishares etfs net inflows of $ 67.5 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and treasury bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 89.8 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2017 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312016</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fximpact</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 176675</td><td>$ -2502 ( 2502 )</td><td>$ 17387</td><td>$ 4985</td><td>$ 196545</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>149432</td><td>23925</td><td>24532</td><td>1577</td><td>199466</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>68395</td><td>-1047 ( 1047 )</td><td>7522</td><td>8819</td><td>83689</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>505</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td><td>119</td><td>2014</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 395007</td><td>$ 20330</td><td>$ 49560</td><td>$ 15381</td><td>$ 480278</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) futureadvisor amounts do not include aum held in ishares etfs . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 18.9 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 20.8 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2017 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 1.1 billion reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 5.8 billion in 2017 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 41% ( 41 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 16% ( 16 % ) organically in 2017 , with net inflows of $ 23.9 billion . institutional investors represented 93% ( 93 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 87% ( 87 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary active asset allocation overlay model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . underlying investments are primarily index products . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of investment management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of the balance of asset allocation from 2016 to 2017?\nAnswer: 19870.0\nQuestion: what was the 2016 value?\nAnswer: 176675.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.11247"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3300
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 9 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>pension plans 2019</td><td>pension plans 2018</td><td>pension plans 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 134</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>107</td><td>90</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>( 180 )</td><td>( 154 )</td><td>( 112 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization of prior service credit</td><td>( 13 )</td><td>( 13 )</td><td>( 14 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of loss</td><td>78</td><td>78</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>10</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net pension cost</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 138</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans</td><td>$ 32</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 43</td></tr></table> net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 32 $ 34 $ 43 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2019 and 2018 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year . as further discussed in note 2 , upon adopting an accounting standard update on october 1 , 2018 , all components of the company 2019s net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs , aside from service cost , are recorded to other income ( expense ) , net on its consolidated statements of income , for all periods presented . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company .\nQuestion: in the year of 2017, how much did the pension service cost represent in relation to the interest one?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.80328"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7482
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n31mar201122064257 positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which we anticipate could change materially within the next twelve months . liquidity and capital resources . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>fiscal years ended october 1 2010</td><td>fiscal years ended october 2 2009</td><td>fiscal years ended october 3 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period</td><td>$ 364221</td><td>$ 225104</td><td>$ 241577</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>222962</td><td>218805</td><td>182673</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-95329 ( 95329 )</td><td>-49528 ( 49528 )</td><td>-94959 ( 94959 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-38597 ( 38597 )</td><td>-30160 ( 30160 )</td><td>-104187 ( 104187 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cash and cash equivalents at end of period ( 1 )</td><td>$ 453257</td><td>$ 364221</td><td>$ 225104</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include restricted cash balances cash flow from operating activities : cash provided from operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for fiscal year 2010 we generated $ 223.0 million in cash flow from operations , an increase of $ 4.2 million when compared to the $ 218.8 million generated in fiscal year 2009 . during fiscal year 2010 , net income increased by $ 42.3 million to $ 137.3 million when compared to fiscal year 2009 . despite the increase in net income , net cash provided by operating activities remained relatively consistent . this was primarily due to : 2022 fiscal year 2010 net income included a deferred tax expense of $ 38.5 million compared to a $ 24.9 million deferred tax benefit included in 2009 net income due to the release of the tax valuation allowance in fiscal year 2009 . 2022 during fiscal year 2010 , the company invested in working capital as result of higher business activity . compared to fiscal year 2009 , accounts receivable , inventory and accounts payable increased by $ 60.9 million , $ 38.8 million and $ 42.9 million , respectively . cash flow from investing activities : cash flow from investing activities consists primarily of capital expenditures and acquisitions . we had net cash outflows of $ 95.3 million in fiscal year 2010 , compared to $ 49.5 million in fiscal year 2009 . the increase is primarily due to an increase of $ 49.8 million in capital expenditures . we anticipate our capital spending to be consistent in fiscal year 2011 to maintain our projected growth rate . cash flow from financing activities : cash flows from financing activities consist primarily of cash transactions related to debt and equity . during fiscal year 2010 , we had net cash outflows of $ 38.6 million , compared to $ 30.2 million in fiscal year 2009 . during the year we had the following significant transactions : 2022 we retired $ 53.0 million in aggregate principal amount ( carrying value of $ 51.1 million ) of 2007 convertible notes for $ 80.7 million , which included a $ 29.6 million premium paid for the equity component of the instrument . 2022 we received net proceeds from employee stock option exercises of $ 40.5 million in fiscal year 2010 , compared to $ 38.7 million in fiscal year 2009 . skyworks / 2010 annual report 103 .\nQuestion: what was the value of cash outflows in 2010?\nAnswer: 95.3\nQuestion: what was the value of cash outflows in 2009?\nAnswer: 49.5\nQuestion: what is the net difference?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "45.8"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2231
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nn o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries share-based compensation expense for stock options and shares issued under the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) amounted to $ 24 million ( $ 22 million after tax or $ 0.07 per basic and diluted share ) , $ 23 million ( $ 21 million after tax or $ 0.06 per basic and diluted share ) , and $ 20 million ( $ 18 million after tax or $ 0.05 per basic and diluted share ) for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , respectively . for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , the expense for the restricted stock was $ 101 million ( $ 71 million after tax ) , $ 77 million ( $ 57 million after tax ) , and $ 65 million ( $ 49 million after tax ) , respectively . during 2004 , the company established the ace limited 2004 long-term incentive plan ( the 2004 ltip ) . once the 2004 ltip was approved by shareholders , it became effective february 25 , 2004 . it will continue in effect until terminated by the board . this plan replaced the ace limited 1995 long-term incentive plan , the ace limited 1995 outside directors plan , the ace limited 1998 long-term incentive plan , and the ace limited 1999 replacement long-term incentive plan ( the prior plans ) except as to outstanding awards . during the company 2019s 2008 annual general meeting , shareholders voted to increase the number of common shares authorized to be issued under the 2004 ltip from 15000000 common shares to 19000000 common shares . accordingly , under the 2004 ltip , a total of 19000000 common shares of the company are authorized to be issued pursuant to awards made as stock options , stock appreciation rights , performance shares , performance units , restricted stock , and restricted stock units . the maximum number of shares that may be delivered to participants and their beneficiaries under the 2004 ltip shall be equal to the sum of : ( i ) 19000000 shares ; and ( ii ) any shares that are represented by awards granted under the prior plans that are forfeited , expired , or are canceled after the effective date of the 2004 ltip , without delivery of shares or which result in the forfeiture of the shares back to the company to the extent that such shares would have been added back to the reserve under the terms of the applicable prior plan . as of december 31 , 2008 , a total of 10591090 shares remain available for future issuance under this plan . under the 2004 ltip , 3000000 common shares are authorized to be issued under the espp . as of december 31 , 2008 , a total of 989812 common shares remain available for issuance under the espp . stock options the company 2019s 2004 ltip provides for grants of both incentive and non-qualified stock options principally at an option price per share of 100 percent of the fair value of the company 2019s common shares on the date of grant . stock options are generally granted with a 3-year vesting period and a 10-year term . the stock options vest in equal annual installments over the respective vesting period , which is also the requisite service period . included in the company 2019s share-based compensation expense in the year ended december 31 , 2008 , is the cost related to the unvested portion of the 2005-2008 stock option grants . the fair value of the stock options was estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option-pricing model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table . the risk-free inter- est rate is based on the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the expected life ( estimated period of time from grant to exercise date ) was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees . expected volatility was calculated as a blend of ( a ) historical volatility based on daily closing prices over a period equal to the expected life assumption , ( b ) long- term historical volatility based on daily closing prices over the period from ace 2019s initial public trading date through the most recent quarter , and ( c ) implied volatility derived from ace 2019s publicly traded options . the fair value of the options issued is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option-pricing model , with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants for the years indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.80% ( 1.80 % )</td><td>1.78% ( 1.78 % )</td><td>1.64% ( 1.64 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>32.20% ( 32.20 % )</td><td>27.43% ( 27.43 % )</td><td>31.29% ( 31.29 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>3.15% ( 3.15 % )</td><td>4.51% ( 4.51 % )</td><td>4.60% ( 4.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeiture rate</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected life</td><td>5.7 years</td><td>5.6 years</td><td>6 years</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the risk-free interest rate in 2008?\nAnswer: 3.15\nQuestion: what about in 2007?\nAnswer: 4.51\nQuestion: what is the net change in risk-free interest rate?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-1.36"
}
] |
CONVFINQA583
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfederal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2009 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>96454</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-80258 ( 80258 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>756703</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>101321</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11766 ( 11766 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>846258</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>103.698</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11869 ( 11869 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>$ 938087</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: combined, what were the additions in 2006 and 207?\nAnswer: 197775.0\nQuestion: and in 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "103.698"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9832
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nuncertain tax positions the following is a reconciliation of the company's beginning and ending amount of uncertain tax positions ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 191</td><td>$ 164</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>31</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>53</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>business combinations</td><td>2014</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 218</td><td>$ 191</td></tr></table> the company's liability for uncertain tax positions as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , includes $ 180 million , $ 154 million , and $ 141 million , respectively , related to amounts that would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . it is possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect the change to have a significant impact on our consolidated statements of income or consolidated balance sheets . these changes may be the result of settlements of ongoing audits . at this time , an estimate of the range of the reasonably possible outcomes within the twelve months cannot be made . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in its provision for income taxes . the company accrued potential interest and penalties of $ 2 million , $ 4 million , and $ 2 million in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recorded a liability for interest and penalties of $ 33 million , $ 31 million , and $ 27 million as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in their respective jurisdictions . the company has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2007 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2005 . the company has concluded income tax examinations in its primary non-u.s . jurisdictions through 2005 . 9 . shareholders' equity distributable reserves as a u.k . incorporated company , the company is required under u.k . law to have available \"distributable reserves\" to make share repurchases or pay dividends to shareholders . distributable reserves may be created through the earnings of the u.k . parent company and , amongst other methods , through a reduction in share capital approved by the english companies court . distributable reserves are not linked to a u.s . gaap reported amount ( e.g. , retained earnings ) . as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , the company had distributable reserves in excess of $ 2.1 billion and $ 4.0 billion , respectively . ordinary shares in april 2012 , the company's board of directors authorized a share repurchase program under which up to $ 5.0 billion of class a ordinary shares may be repurchased ( \"2012 share repurchase program\" ) . in november 2014 , the company's board of directors authorized a new $ 5.0 billion share repurchase program in addition to the existing program ( \"2014 share repurchase program\" and , together , the \"repurchase programs\" ) . under each program , shares may be repurchased through the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , based on prevailing market conditions , funded from available capital . during 2015 , the company repurchased 16.0 million shares at an average price per share of $ 97.04 for a total cost of $ 1.6 billion under the repurchase programs . during 2014 , the company repurchased 25.8 million shares at an average price per share of $ 87.18 for a total cost of $ 2.3 billion under the 2012 share repurchase plan . in august 2015 , the $ 5 billion of class a ordinary shares authorized under the 2012 share repurchase program was exhausted . at december 31 , 2015 , the remaining authorized amount for share repurchase under the 2014 share repurchase program is $ 4.1 billion . under the repurchase programs , the company repurchased a total of 78.1 million shares for an aggregate cost of $ 5.9 billion. .\nQuestion: what was the balance of uncertain tax positions in the end of 2015?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "218.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10800
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nasset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .\nQuestion: what was the balance of level 3 in 2018?\nAnswer: 230.0\nQuestion: and as of 2017?\nAnswer: 140.0\nQuestion: so what was the change in value during these years?\nAnswer: 90.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change during this time?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.64286"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10954
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . significant revenue arrangements ( continued ) $ 7 million of development and commercialization milestone payments . additionally , kissei agreed to reimburse the company for certain development costs , including a portion of costs for phase 2 trials of vx-702 . research funding ended under this program in june 2000 , and the company has received the full amount of research funding specified under the agreement . kissei has exclusive rights to develop and commercialize vx-702 in japan and certain far east countries and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . the company retains exclusive marketing rights outside the far east and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . in addition , the company will have the right to supply bulk drug material to kissei for sale in its territory and will receive royalties or drug supply payments on future product sales , if any . in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 6.4 million , $ 7.3 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively , was recognized as revenue under this agreement . the $ 7.3 million of revenue recognized in 2005 includes a $ 2.5 million milestone paid upon kissei 2019s completion of regulatory filings in preparation for phase 1 clinical development of vx-702 in japan . p . employee benefits the company has a 401 ( k ) retirement plan ( the 201cvertex 401 ( k ) plan 201d ) in which substantially all of its permanent employees are eligible to participate . participants may contribute up to 60% ( 60 % ) of their annual compensation to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan , subject to statutory limitations . the company may declare discretionary matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan that are payable in the form of vertex common stock . the match is paid in the form of fully vested interests in a vertex common stock fund . employees have the ability to transfer funds from the company stock fund as they choose . the company declared matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan as follows ( in thousands ) : q . related party transactions as of december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , the company had a loan outstanding to a former officer of the company in the amount of $ 36000 , $ 36000 , $ 97000 , respectively , which was initially advanced in april 2002 . the loan balance is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . in 2001 , the company entered into a four year consulting agreement with a director of the company for the provision of part-time consulting services over a period of four years , at the rate of $ 80000 per year commencing in january 2002 . the consulting agreement terminated in january 2006 . r . contingencies the company has certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities . the company accrues a reserve for contingent liabilities when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31,</td><td>$ 3341</td><td>$ 2894</td><td>$ 2492</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issued during the year ended december 31,</td><td>91</td><td>215</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issuable as of the year ended december 31,</td><td>28</td><td>19</td><td>57</td></tr></table> discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31 , $ 3341 $ 2894 $ 2492 shares issued during the year ended december 31 , 91 215 239 shares issuable as of the year ended december 31 , 28 19 57 .\nQuestion: what was the total of share issuable in 2006?\nAnswer: 28.0\nQuestion: and what was that in 2005?\nAnswer: 19.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 9.0\nQuestion: what was the total of share issuable in 2005?\nAnswer: 19.0\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2005 total, in percentage?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.47368"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10227
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average fair value of options granted</td><td>$ 18.47</td><td>$ 33.81</td><td>$ 20.01</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>0.3845</td><td>0.3677</td><td>0.3534</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.75% ( 3.75 % )</td><td>0.76% ( 0.76 % )</td><td>1.00% ( 1.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life of options in years</td><td>6.0</td><td>6.0</td><td>6.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td></tr></table> the black-scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable . in addition , option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions , including the expected stock price volatility . because the company 2019s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options , and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate , in management 2019s opinion , the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options . the fair value of the rsus was determined based on the market value at the date of grant . the total fair value of awards vested during 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 was $ 35384 , $ 17840 , and $ 9413 , respectively . the total stock based compensation expense calculated using the black-scholes option valuation model in 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 was $ 38872 , $ 22164 , and $ 11913 , respectively.the aggregate intrinsic values of options outstanding and exercisable at december 27 , 2008 were $ 8.2 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively . the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended december 27 , 2008 was $ 0.6 million . aggregate intrinsic value represents the positive difference between the company 2019s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal period , which was $ 19.39 on december 27 , 2008 , and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options exercised . as of december 27 , 2008 , there was $ 141.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation awards granted to employees under the stock compensation plans . that cost is expected to be recognized over a period of five years . employee stock purchase plan the shareholders also adopted an employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) . up to 2000000 shares of common stock have been reserved for the espp . shares will be offered to employees at a price equal to the lesser of 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value of the stock on the date of purchase or 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value on the enrollment date . the espp is intended to qualify as an 201cemployee stock purchase plan 201d under section 423 of the internal revenue code . during 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , 362902 , 120230 , and 124693 shares , respectively were purchased under the plan for a total purchase price of $ 8782 , $ 5730 , and $ 3569 , respectively . at december 27 , 2008 , approximately 663679 shares were available for future issuance . 10 . earnings per share the following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share: .\nQuestion: what was the dividend yield in 2008?\nAnswer: 0.0375\nQuestion: and what would be the result of that yield as a percentage of 1 plus the number 1?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.0375"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1692
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company entered into agreements with various governmental entities in the states of kentucky , georgia and tennessee to implement tax abatement plans related to its distribution center in franklin , kentucky ( simpson county ) , its distribution center in macon , georgia ( bibb county ) , and its store support center in brentwood , tennessee ( williamson county ) . the tax abatement plans provide for reduction of real property taxes for specified time frames by legally transferring title to its real property in exchange for industrial revenue bonds . this property was then leased back to the company . no cash was exchanged . the lease payments are equal to the amount of the payments on the bonds . the tax abatement period extends through the term of the lease , which coincides with the maturity date of the bonds . at any time , the company has the option to purchase the real property by paying off the bonds , plus $ 1 . the terms and amounts authorized and drawn under each industrial revenue bond agreement are outlined as follows , as of december 30 , 2017 : bond term bond authorized amount ( in millions ) amount drawn ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>bond term</td><td>bond authorized amount ( in millions )</td><td>amount drawn ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>franklin kentucky distribution center</td><td>30 years</td><td>$ 54.0</td><td>$ 51.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>macon georgia distribution center</td><td>15 years</td><td>$ 58.0</td><td>$ 49.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brentwood tennessee store support center</td><td>10 years</td><td>$ 78.0</td><td>$ 75.3</td></tr></table> due to the form of these transactions , the company has not recorded the bonds or the lease obligation associated with the sale lease-back transaction . the original cost of the company 2019s property and equipment is recorded on the balance sheet and is being depreciated over its estimated useful life . capitalized software costs the company capitalizes certain costs related to the acquisition and development of software and amortizes these costs using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software , which is three to five years . computer software consists of software developed for internal use and third-party software purchased for internal use . a subsequent addition , modification or upgrade to internal-use software is capitalized to the extent that it enhances the software 2019s functionality or extends its useful life . these costs are included in computer software and hardware in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . certain software costs not meeting the criteria for capitalization are expensed as incurred . store closing costs the company regularly evaluates the performance of its stores and periodically closes those that are under-performing . the company records a liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity when the liability is incurred , usually in the period the store closes . store closing costs were not significant to the results of operations for any of the fiscal years presented . leases assets under capital leases are amortized in accordance with the company 2019s normal depreciation policy for owned assets or over the lease term , if shorter , and the related charge to operations is included in depreciation expense in the consolidated statements of income . certain operating leases include rent increases during the lease term . for these leases , the company recognizes the related rental expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease ( which includes the pre-opening period of construction , renovation , fixturing and merchandise placement ) and records the difference between the expense charged to operations and amounts paid as a deferred rent liability . the company occasionally receives reimbursements from landlords to be used towards improving the related store to be leased . leasehold improvements are recorded at their gross costs , including items reimbursed by landlords . related reimbursements are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense over the applicable lease term . note 2 - share-based compensation : share-based compensation includes stock option and restricted stock unit awards and certain transactions under the company 2019s espp . share-based compensation expense is recognized based on the grant date fair value of all stock option and restricted stock unit awards plus a discount on shares purchased by employees as a part of the espp . the discount under the espp represents the difference between the purchase date market value and the employee 2019s purchase price. .\nQuestion: what is the percent of the amount drawn to the amount authorized for the franklin kentucky distribution center?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.95926"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6910
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsystem energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; debt issuances ; and bank financing under new or existing facilities . system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . in february 2012 , system energy vie issued $ 50 million of 4.02% ( 4.02 % ) series h notes due february 2017 . system energy used the proceeds to purchase additional nuclear fuel . system energy has obtained a short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow , through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 200 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits . system energy has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long-term authorization extends through july 2013 . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 120424</td><td>$ 97948</td><td>$ 90507</td><td>$ 42915</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . nuclear matters system energy owns and operates grand gulf . system energy is , therefore , subject to the risks related to owning and operating a nuclear plant . these include risks from the use , storage , handling and disposal of high- level and low-level radioactive materials , regulatory requirement changes , including changes resulting from events at other plants , limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available for losses in connection with nuclear operations , and technological and financial uncertainties related to decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives , including the sufficiency of funds in decommissioning trusts . in the event of an unanticipated early shutdown of grand gulf , system energy may be required to provide additional funds or credit support to satisfy regulatory requirements for decommissioning . after the nuclear incident in japan resulting from the march 2011 earthquake and tsunami , the nrc established a task force to conduct a review of processes and regulations relating to nuclear facilities in the united states . the task force issued a near term ( 90-day ) report in july 2011 that has made recommendations , which are currently being evaluated by the nrc . it is anticipated that the nrc will issue certain orders and requests for information to nuclear plant licensees by the end of the first quarter 2012 that will begin to implement the task force 2019s recommendations . these orders may require u.s . nuclear operators , including entergy , to undertake plant modifications or perform additional analyses that could , among other things , result in increased costs and capital requirements associated with operating entergy 2019s nuclear plants. .\nQuestion: what is the system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool in 2011?\nAnswer: 120424.0\nQuestion: what about in 2010?\nAnswer: 97948.0\nQuestion: what is the total for 2010 and 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "218372.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5738
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsynopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) and other electronic applications markets . the company believes the acquisition will expand its technology portfolio , channel reach and total addressable market by adding complementary products and expertise for fpga solutions and rapid asic prototyping . purchase price . synopsys paid $ 8.00 per share for all outstanding shares including certain vested options of synplicity for an aggregate cash payment of $ 223.3 million . additionally , synopsys assumed certain employee stock options and restricted stock units , collectively called 201cstock awards . 201d the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 180618</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of assumed vested or earned stock awards</td><td>4169</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition related costs</td><td>8016</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price consideration</td><td>$ 192803</td></tr></table> acquisition related costs consist primarily of professional services , severance and employee related costs and facilities closure costs of which $ 6.8 million have been paid as of october 31 , 2009 . fair value of stock awards assumed . an aggregate of 4.7 million shares of synplicity stock options and restricted stock units were exchanged for synopsys stock options and restricted stock units at an exchange ratio of 0.3392 per share . the fair value of stock options assumed was determined using a black-scholes valuation model . the fair value of stock awards vested or earned of $ 4.2 million was included as part of the purchase price . the fair value of unvested awards of $ 5.0 million will be recorded as operating expense over the remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . purchase price allocation . the company allocated $ 80.0 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets to be amortized over two to seven years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 4.8 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired , was $ 120.3 million and will not be amortized . goodwill primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of cost synergies and sales growth from the integration of synplicity 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations to provide an expansion of products and market reach . fiscal 2007 acquisitions during fiscal year 2007 , the company completed certain purchase acquisitions for cash . the company allocated the total purchase considerations of $ 54.8 million ( which included acquisition related costs of $ 1.4 million ) to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 36.6 million . acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 14.3 million are being amortized over two to nine years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 3.2 million. .\nQuestion: what was the total goodwill value, in thousands?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "120300.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7762
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds . these awards vested in january 2015 . the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited . in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded . in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) . distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period . during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan . the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service . because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date . rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years . rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant . rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>14.93% ( 14.93 % )</td><td>17.78% ( 17.78 % )</td><td>19.37% ( 19.37 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.07% ( 1.07 % )</td><td>0.75% ( 0.75 % )</td><td>0.40% ( 0.40 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grant date fair value per share</td><td>$ 62.10</td><td>$ 45.45</td><td>$ 40.13</td></tr></table> the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years . the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .\nQuestion: what is the grant date fair value per share in 2015?\nAnswer: 62.1\nQuestion: what about in 2014?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "45.45"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8319
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2008 , 2007 and 2006 offering periods employees purchased 55764 , 48886 and 53210 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 30.08 , $ 33.93 and $ 24.98 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2008 , 2007 and 2006 were $ 7.89 , $ 9.09 and $ 6.79 , respectively . at december 31 , 2008 , 8.8 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk free interest rates</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) 20143.28% ( 20143.28 % )</td><td>4.98% ( 4.98 % ) 20145.05% ( 20145.05 % )</td><td>5.01% ( 5.01 % ) 20145.17% ( 20145.17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td><td>5.02% ( 5.02 % )</td><td>5.08% ( 5.08 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of the shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) 201428.51% ( 201428.51 % )</td><td>27.53% ( 27.53 % ) 201428.74% ( 201428.74 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td><td>28.22% ( 28.22 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in january 2003 , the company issued warrants to purchase approximately 11.4 million shares of its common stock in connection with an offering of 808000 units , each consisting of $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of ati 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of the company 2019s common stock . these warrants became exercisable on january 29 , 2006 at an exercise price of $ 0.01 per share . as these warrants expired on august 1 , 2008 , none were outstanding as of december 31 , in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately 1.8 million and 2.0 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these warrants will expire on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase programs 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 18.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 697.1 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase programs , as described below. .\nQuestion: what was the change in shares bought by employees from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: 6878.0\nQuestion: how much does that change represent in relation to the total of shares bought by employees in 2007, in percentage?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.14069"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10818
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunited kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we incurred $ 695.8 million of realized investment gains and $ 310.4 million of unrealized investment losses . although financial markets significantly improved during 2009 and 2010 , they could deteriorate in the future and again result in substantial realized and unrealized losses , which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 571.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>67.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>364.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>160.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2006</td><td>287.9</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "364.3"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7401
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the years ended september 28 , 2013 , september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 ( in millions ) : the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . the company anticipates the cash used for future dividends and the share repurchase program will come from its current domestic cash , cash generated from on-going u.s . operating activities and from borrowings . as of september 28 , 2013 and september 29 , 2012 , $ 111.3 billion and $ 82.6 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly-rated securities and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer . the policy requires investments generally to be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss . during 2013 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 53.7 billion was a result of $ 37.0 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 10.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 6.5 billion . cash used in investing activities of $ 33.8 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of net purchases , sales and maturities of marketable securities of $ 24.0 billion and cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 8.2 billion . cash used in financing activities during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 22.9 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalent rights of $ 10.6 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $ 16.9 billion . during 2012 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 50.9 billion was a result of $ 41.7 billion of net income and non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 9.4 billion , partially offset by a decrease in net operating assets and liabilities of $ 299 million . cash used in investing activities during 2012 of $ 48.2 billion consisted primarily of net purchases , sales and maturities of marketable securities of $ 38.4 billion and cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 8.3 billion . cash used in financing activities during 2012 of $ 1.7 billion consisted primarily of cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalent rights of $ 2.5 billion . capital assets the company 2019s capital expenditures were $ 7.0 billion during 2013 , consisting of $ 499 million for retail store facilities and $ 6.5 billion for other capital expenditures , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and other corporate facilities and infrastructure . the company 2019s actual cash payments for capital expenditures during 2013 were $ 8.2 billion. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 146761</td><td>$ 121251</td><td>$ 81570</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property plant and equipment net</td><td>$ 16597</td><td>$ 15452</td><td>$ 7777</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 16960</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 29628</td><td>$ 19111</td><td>$ 17018</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cash generated by operating activities</td><td>$ 53666</td><td>$ 50856</td><td>$ 37529</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>$ -33774 ( 33774 )</td><td>$ -48227 ( 48227 )</td><td>$ -40419 ( 40419 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cash generated/ ( used in ) by financing activities</td><td>$ -16379 ( 16379 )</td><td>$ -1698 ( 1698 )</td><td>$ 1444</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the total long-term debt of 2013 and 2012?\nAnswer: 16960.0\nQuestion: then what is the total long-term debt if we also include the year 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "16960.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1329
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations state street corporation | 90 table 30 : total deposits average balance december 31 years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>client deposits</td><td>$ 180149</td><td>$ 176693</td><td>$ 158996</td><td>$ 156029</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wholesale cds</td><td>4747</td><td>10470</td><td>4812</td><td>14456</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total deposits</td><td>$ 184896</td><td>$ 187163</td><td>$ 163808</td><td>$ 170485</td></tr></table> short-term funding our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 2.84 billion and $ 4.40 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad 1.40 billion , or approximately $ 1.11 billion as of december 31 , 2017 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding we have the ability to issue debt and equity securities under our current universal shelf registration to meet current commitments and business needs , including accommodating the transaction and cash management needs of our clients . in addition , state street bank , a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company , also has authorization to issue up to $ 5 billion in unsecured senior debt and an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include : 2022 diverse and stable core earnings ; 2022 relative market position ; 2022 strong risk management ; 2022 strong capital ratios ; 2022 diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; 2022 strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and 2022 preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by : 2022 providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors ; 2022 increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products ; 2022 serving markets ; and 2022 engaging in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital markets , which could increase the related cost of funds . in turn , this could cause the sudden and large-scale withdrawal of unsecured deposits by our clients , which could lead to draw-downs of unfunded commitments to extend credit or trigger requirements under securities purchase commitments ; or require additional collateral or force terminations of certain trading derivative contracts . a majority of our derivative contracts have been entered into under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings . we assess the impact of these arrangements by determining the collateral that would be required assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . the additional collateral or termination payments related to our net derivative liabilities under these arrangements that could have been called by counterparties in the event of a downgrade in our credit ratings below levels specified in the agreements is disclosed in note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , of this form 10-k . other funding sources , such as secured financing transactions and other margin requirements , for which there are no explicit triggers , could also be adversely affected. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2017, what was the value of cad equivalent to one american dollar?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.26126"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3520
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .\nQuestion: what was the fluctuation of the value of the cadence design system from 2006 to 2007?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-7.22"
}
] |
CONVFINQA11058
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nu.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized at level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . commodities are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav.aa thenavaa valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the navaa is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the navaa is based on valuationmodels and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds forwhich thenavaa is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . there were no material contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans during 2017 . we will make contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions.as a result of these contributions , we do not expect any material qualified defined benefit cash funding will be required until 2021.we plan to fund these contributions using a mix of cash on hand and commercial paper . while we do not anticipate a need to do so , our capital structure and resources would allow us to issue new debt if circumstances change . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023 2013 2027</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 2450</td><td>$ 2480</td><td>$ 2560</td><td>$ 2630</td><td>$ 2700</td><td>$ 14200</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>820</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans wemaintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , wematchmost employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 613 million in 2017 , $ 617 million in 2016 and $ 393 million in 2015 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 35.5 million and 36.9 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016. .\nQuestion: from 2018 to 2019, what was the change in the total of qualified defined benefit pension plans expected payments?\nAnswer: 30.0\nQuestion: and for the two year period ended two years earlier, what was the variation in the employee total matching contributions?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "224.0"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.