Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA3803	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company ( b ) these reclassifications were recorded to interest expense and cost of products sold . additional details regarding the company's cash flow hedges are provided in note 13 . on august 25 , 2016 , in anticipation of proceeds to be received from the divestiture of the respiratory solutions business in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase ( \"asr\" ) agreement . subsequent to the end of the company's fiscal year 2016 and as per the terms of the asr agreement , the company received approximately 1.3 million shares of its common stock , which was recorded as a $ 220 million increase to common stock in treasury . note 4 2014 earnings per share the weighted average common shares used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share ( shares in thousands ) for the years ended september 30 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average common shares outstanding</td><td>212702</td><td>202537</td><td>193299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dilutive share equivalents from share-based plans</td><td>4834</td><td>4972</td><td>4410</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 2014 assuming dilution</td><td>217536</td><td>207509</td><td>197709</td></tr></table> average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 2014 assuming dilution 217536 207509 197709 upon closing the acquisition of carefusion corporation ( 201ccarefusion 201d ) on march 17 , 2015 , the company issued approximately 15.9 million of its common shares as part of the purchase consideration . additional disclosures regarding this acquisition are provided in note 9 . options to purchase shares of common stock are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share when their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect on the calculation . for the years ended september 30 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 there were no options to purchase shares of common stock which were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation. .\nQuestion: what was the percentage of total average common and common equivalent shares outstanding in 2014 assuming dilution that was dilute share equivalents from share-based plans?\nAnswer: 0.02231\nQuestion: what was the total number of average common shares outstanding in 2015 and 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "415239.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5744	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncustomary conditions . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture . as of december 31 , 2008 , the joint venture has acquired seven properties from us and we received year-to-date net sale proceeds and financing distributions of approximately $ 251.6 million . in january 2008 , we sold a tract of land to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we hold a 50% ( 50 % ) equity interest and received a distribution , commensurate to our partner 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership interest , of approximately $ 38.3 million . in november 2008 , that unconsolidated joint venture entered a loan agreement with a consortium of banks and distributed a portion of the loan proceeds to us and our partner , with our share of the distribution totaling $ 20.4 million . uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 property investment ; 2022 recurring leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; 2022 opportunistic repurchases of outstanding debt ; and 2022 other contractual obligations . property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and we are limiting new development expenditures . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>recurring tenant improvements</td><td>$ 36885</td><td>$ 45296</td><td>$ 41895</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>recurring leasing costs</td><td>28205</td><td>32238</td><td>32983</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>9724</td><td>8402</td><td>8122</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>totals</td><td>$ 74814</td><td>$ 85936</td><td>$ 83000</td></tr></table> dividends and distributions in order to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes , we must currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our taxable income to shareholders . because depreciation is a non-cash expense , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 1.93 , $ 1.91 and $ 1.89 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute taxable earnings to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status . however , distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . in january 2009 , our board of directors resolved to decrease our annual dividend from $ 1.94 per share to $ 1.00 per share in order to retain additional cash to help meet our capital needs . we anticipate retaining additional cash of approximately $ 145.2 million per year , when compared to an annual dividend of $ 1.94 per share , as the result of this action . at december 31 , 2008 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. .\nQuestion: what was the total recurring capital expenditure in 2007?\nAnswer: 85936.0\nQuestion: and in 2006?\nAnswer: 83000.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference between these two years?\nAnswer: 2936.0\nQuestion: and as a percentage of the original value?\nAnswer: 0.03537\nQuestion: and converted from a decimal into a percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.53735" } ]
CONVFINQA8728	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nblackrock n 96 n notes in april 2009 , the company acquired $ 2 million of finite- lived management contracts with a five-year estimated useful life associated with the acquisition of the r3 capital partners funds . in december 2009 , in conjunction with the bgi trans- action , the company acquired $ 163 million of finite- lived management contracts with a weighted-average estimated useful life of approximately 10 years . estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is as follows : ( dollar amounts in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 160</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>157</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>156</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>149</td></tr></table> indefinite-lived acquired management contracts on september 29 , 2006 , in conjunction with the mlim transaction , the company acquired indefinite-lived man- agement contracts valued at $ 4477 million consisting of $ 4271 million for all retail mutual funds and $ 206 million for alternative investment products . on october 1 , 2007 , in conjunction with the quellos transaction , the company acquired $ 631 million in indefinite-lived management contracts associated with alternative investment products . on october 1 , 2007 , the company purchased the remain- ing 20% ( 20 % ) of an investment manager of a fund of hedge funds . in conjunction with this transaction , the company recorded $ 8 million in additional indefinite-lived management contracts associated with alternative investment products . on december 1 , 2009 , in conjunction with the bgi transaction , the company acquired $ 9785 million in indefinite-lived management contracts valued consisting primarily for exchange traded funds and common and collective trusts . indefinite-lived acquired trade names/trademarks on december 1 , 2009 , in conjunction with the bgi transaction , the company acquired trade names/ trademarks primarily related to ishares valued at $ 1402.5 million . the fair value was determined using a royalty rate based primarily on normalized marketing and promotion expenditures to develop and support the brands globally . 13 . borrowings short-term borrowings 2007 facility in august 2007 , the company entered into a five-year $ 2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility ( the 201c2007 facility 201d ) , which permits the company to request an additional $ 500 million of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , up to a maximum of $ 3.0 billion . the 2007 facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortiza- tion , where net debt equals total debt less domestic unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2009 . the 2007 facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities . at december 31 , 2009 , the company had $ 200 million outstanding under the 2007 facility with an interest rate of 0.44% ( 0.44 % ) and a maturity date during february 2010 . during february 2010 , the company rolled over $ 100 million in borrowings with an interest rate of 0.43% ( 0.43 % ) and a maturity date in may 2010 . lehman commercial paper inc . has a $ 140 million participation under the 2007 facility ; however blackrock does not expect that lehman commercial paper inc . will honor its commitment to fund additional amounts . bank of america , a related party , has a $ 140 million participation under the 2007 facility . in december 2007 , in order to support two enhanced cash funds that blackrock manages , blackrock elected to procure two letters of credit under the existing 2007 facility in an aggregate amount of $ 100 million . in decem- ber 2008 , the letters of credit were terminated . commercial paper program on october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a com- mercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company may issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3 billion . the proceeds of the commercial paper issuances were used for the financing of a portion of the bgi transaction . subsidiaries of bank of america and barclays , as well as other third parties , act as dealers under the cp program . the cp program is supported by the 2007 facility . the company began issuance of cp notes under the cp program on november 4 , 2009 . as of december 31 , 2009 , blackrock had approximately $ 2 billion of out- standing cp notes with a weighted average interest rate of 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and a weighted average maturity of 23 days . since december 31 , 2009 , the company repaid approxi- mately $ 1.4 billion of cp notes with proceeds from the long-term notes issued in december 2009 . as of march 5 , 2010 , blackrock had $ 596 million of outstanding cp notes with a weighted average interest rate of 0.18% ( 0.18 % ) and a weighted average maturity of 38 days . japan commitment-line in june 2008 , blackrock japan co. , ltd. , a wholly owned subsidiary of the company , entered into a five billion japanese yen commitment-line agreement with a bank- ing institution ( the 201cjapan commitment-line 201d ) . the term of the japan commitment-line was one year and interest accrued at the applicable japanese short-term prime rate . in june 2009 , blackrock japan co. , ltd . renewed the japan commitment-line for a term of one year . the japan commitment-line is intended to provide liquid- ity and flexibility for operating requirements in japan . at december 31 , 2009 , the company had no borrowings outstanding on the japan commitment-line . convertible debentures in february 2005 , the company issued $ 250 million aggregate principal amount of convertible debentures ( the 201cdebentures 201d ) , due in 2035 and bearing interest at a rate of 2.625% ( 2.625 % ) per annum . interest is payable semi- annually in arrears on february 15 and august 15 of each year , and commenced august 15 , 2005 . prior to february 15 , 2009 , the debentures could have been convertible at the option of the holder at a decem- ber 31 , 2008 conversion rate of 9.9639 shares of common stock per one dollar principal amount of debentures under certain circumstances . the debentures would have been convertible into cash and , in some situations as described below , additional shares of the company 2019s common stock , if during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period the trading price per debenture for each day of such period is less than 103% ( 103 % ) of the product of the last reported sales price of blackrock 2019s common stock and the conversion rate of the debentures on each such day or upon the occurrence of certain other corporate events , such as a distribution to the holders of blackrock common stock of certain rights , assets or debt securities , if the company becomes party to a merger , consolidation or transfer of all or substantially all of its assets or a change of control of the company . on february 15 , 2009 , the debentures became convertible into cash at any time prior to maturity at the option of the holder and , in some situations as described below , additional shares of the company 2019s common stock at the current conversion rate . at the time the debentures are tendered for conver- sion , for each one dollar principal amount of debentures converted , a holder shall be entitled to receive cash and shares of blackrock common stock , if any , the aggregate value of which ( the 201cconversion value 201d ) will be deter- mined by multiplying the applicable conversion rate by the average of the daily volume weighted average price of blackrock common stock for each of the ten consecutive trading days beginning on the second trading day imme- diately following the day the debentures are tendered for conversion ( the 201cten-day weighted average price 201d ) . the company will deliver the conversion value to holders as follows : ( 1 ) an amount in cash ( the 201cprincipal return 201d ) equal to the lesser of ( a ) the aggregate conversion value of the debentures to be converted and ( b ) the aggregate principal amount of the debentures to be converted , and ( 2 ) if the aggregate conversion value of the debentures to be converted is greater than the principal return , an amount in shares ( the 201cnet shares 201d ) , determined as set forth below , equal to such aggregate conversion value less the principal return ( the 201cnet share amount 201d ) . the number of net shares to be paid will be determined by dividing the net share amount by the ten-day weighted average price . in lieu of delivering fractional shares , the company will deliver cash based on the ten-day weighted average price . the conversion rate for the debentures is subject to adjustments upon the occurrence of certain corporate events , such as a change of control of the company , 193253ti_txt.indd 96 4/2/10 1:18 pm .\nQuestion: what was the change in estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: 3.0\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to that estimated amortization expense in 2010, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.01911" } ]
CONVFINQA975	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 49 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets businesses in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding net interest income arising from cib 2019s markets businesses to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . cib 2019s markets businesses represent both fixed income markets and equity markets . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of net interest income from cib 2019s markets businesses ( 201ccib markets 201d ) . management believes this exclusion provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non- markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2016 2015 2014 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 47292 $ 44620 $ 44619 less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) 6334 5298 6032 net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) $ 40958 $ 39322 $ 38587 average interest-earning assets $ 2101604 $ 2088242 $ 2049093 less : average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 520307 510292 522989 average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets $ 1581297 $ 1577950 $ 1526104 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) 2.18% ( 2.18 % ) net interest yield on average cib markets interest- earning assets ( c ) 1.22 1.04 1.15 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets 2.59% ( 2.59 % ) 2.49% ( 2.49 % ) 2.53% ( 2.53 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedges . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 48 . ( c ) prior period amounts were revised to align with cib 2019s markets businesses . for further information on cib 2019s markets businesses , see page 61 . calculation of certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures are calculated as follows : book value per share ( 201cbvps 201d ) common stockholders 2019 equity at period-end / common shares at period-end overhead ratio total noninterest expense / total net revenue return on assets ( 201croa 201d ) reported net income / total average assets return on common equity ( 201croe 201d ) net income* / average common stockholders 2019 equity return on tangible common equity ( 201crotce 201d ) net income* / average tangible common equity tangible book value per share ( 201ctbvps 201d ) tangible common equity at period-end / common shares at period-end * represents net income applicable to common equity . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b )</td><td>$ 47292</td><td>$ 44620</td><td>$ 44619</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : cib markets net interest income ( c )</td><td>6334</td><td>5298</td><td>6032</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net interest income excluding cib markets ( a )</td><td>$ 40958</td><td>$ 39322</td><td>$ 38587</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average interest-earning assets</td><td>$ 2101604</td><td>$ 2088242</td><td>$ 2049093</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less : average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c )</td><td>520307</td><td>510292</td><td>522989</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets</td><td>$ 1581297</td><td>$ 1577950</td><td>$ 1526104</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis</td><td>2.25% ( 2.25 % )</td><td>2.14% ( 2.14 % )</td><td>2.18% ( 2.18 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net interest yield on average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c )</td><td>1.22</td><td>1.04</td><td>1.15</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets</td><td>2.59% ( 2.59 % )</td><td>2.49% ( 2.49 % )</td><td>2.53% ( 2.53 % )</td></tr></table> jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 49 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets businesses in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding net interest income arising from cib 2019s markets businesses to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . cib 2019s markets businesses represent both fixed income markets and equity markets . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of net interest income from cib 2019s markets businesses ( 201ccib markets 201d ) . management believes this exclusion provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non- markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2016 2015 2014 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 47292 $ 44620 $ 44619 less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) 6334 5298 6032 net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) $ 40958 $ 39322 $ 38587 average interest-earning assets $ 2101604 $ 2088242 $ 2049093 less : average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 520307 510292 522989 average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets $ 1581297 $ 1577950 $ 1526104 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) 2.18% ( 2.18 % ) net interest yield on average cib markets interest- earning assets ( c ) 1.22 1.04 1.15 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets 2.59% ( 2.59 % ) 2.49% ( 2.49 % ) 2.53% ( 2.53 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedges . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 48 . ( c ) prior period amounts were revised to align with cib 2019s markets businesses . for further information on cib 2019s markets businesses , see page 61 . calculation of certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures are calculated as follows : book value per share ( 201cbvps 201d ) common stockholders 2019 equity at period-end / common shares at period-end overhead ratio total noninterest expense / total net revenue return on assets ( 201croa 201d ) reported net income / total average assets return on common equity ( 201croe 201d ) net income* / average common stockholders 2019 equity return on tangible common equity ( 201crotce 201d ) net income* / average tangible common equity tangible book value per share ( 201ctbvps 201d ) tangible common equity at period-end / common shares at period-end * represents net income applicable to common equity .\nQuestion: as of 2016, what percentage did the the cib markets net interest income represent in relation to the total net interest income 2013 managed basis?i\nAnswer: 0.13393\nQuestion: in that same year, what were the average interest-earning assets, in millions?\nAnswer: 2101604.0\nQuestion: and what was the net interest yield of those assets?\nAnswer: 0.0225\nQuestion: what is, then, the amount from those assets equivalent to this interest yield, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "47286.09" } ]
CONVFINQA8076	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrepublic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 11 . employee benefit plans stock-based compensation in february 2007 , our board of directors approved the 2007 stock incentive plan ( 2007 plan ) , and in may 2007 our shareholders ratified the 2007 plan . in march 2011 , our board of directors approved the amended and restated 2007 stock incentive plan , and in may 2011 our shareholders ratified the amended and restated 2007 stock incentive plan . in march 2013 , our board of directors approved the republic services , inc . amended and restated 2007 stock incentive plan ( the amended and restated plan ) , and in may 2013 our shareholders ratified the amended and restated plan . we currently have approximately 15.6 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the amended and restated plan . options granted under the 2007 plan and the amended and restated plan are non-qualified and are granted at a price equal to the fair market value of our common stock at the date of grant . generally , options granted have a term of seven to ten years from the date of grant , and vest in increments of 25% ( 25 % ) per year over a period of four years beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant . options granted to non-employee directors have a term of ten years and are fully vested at the grant date . in december 2008 , the board of directors amended and restated the republic services , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ( formerly known as the allied waste industries , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ) ( the 2006 plan ) . allied 2019s shareholders approved the 2006 plan in may 2006 . the 2006 plan was amended and restated in december 2008 to reflect republic as the new sponsor of the plan , to reflect that any references to shares of common stock are to shares of common stock of republic , and to adjust outstanding awards and the number of shares available under the plan to reflect the allied acquisition . the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provided for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards . awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the allied acquisition . no further awards will be made under the 2006 stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for 2014 and 2013 ) and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . we did not grant stock options during the year ended december 31 , 2015 . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 5.74 and $ 5.27 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>27.5% ( 27.5 % )</td><td>28.9% ( 28.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7.0</td><td>7.0</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the difference in expected volatility between 2013 and 2014?\nAnswer: -1.4\nQuestion: and the value for 2013 specifically?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "28.9" } ]
CONVFINQA6880	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nd u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 2 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements the company recognizes income on long-term construction contracts where the company serves as a general contractor on the percentage of completion method . using this method , profits are recorded on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion of individual contracts , commencing when progress reaches a point where experience is sufficient to estimate final results with reasonable accuracy . that portion of the estimated earnings is accrued on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion based on contract expenditures incurred and work performed . property sales gains from sales of depreciated property are recognized in accordance with statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 66 , and are included in earnings from sales of land and depreciable property dispositions , net of impairment adjustment , in the statement of operations if identified as held for sale prior to adoption of sfas 144 and in discontinued operations if identified as held for sale after adoption of sfas 144 . gains or losses from the sale of property which is considered held for sale in dclp are recognized in accordance with sfas 66 and are included in construction management and development activity income in the statement of operations . net income per common share basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available for common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period . diluted net income per share is computed by dividing the sum of net income available for common shares and minority interest in earnings of unitholders , by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares and units outstanding and dilutive potential common shares for the period . the following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income per share ( in thousands ) : the series d convertible preferred stock and the series g convertible preferred limited partner units were anti-dilutive for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 ; therefore , no conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . in september 2002 , the company redeemed the series g convertible preferred units at their par value of $ 35.0 million . a joint venture partner in one of the company 2019s unconsolidated companies has the option to convert a portion of its ownership to company common shares ( see discussion in investments in unconsolidated companies section ) . the effect of the option on earnings per share was dilutive for the year ended december 31 , 2001 ; therefore , conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . federal income taxes the company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ( 201creit 201d ) under the internal revenue code . to qualify as a reit , the company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements , including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of its taxable income to its stockholders . management intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain the company 2019s reit status . as a reit , the company is entitled to a tax deduction for some or all of the dividends it pays to its shareholders . accordingly , the company generally will not be subject to federal income taxes as long as it distributes an amount equal to or in excess of its taxable income currently to its stockholders . a reit generally is subject to federal income taxes on any taxable income that is not currently distributed to its shareholders . if the company fails to qualify as a reit in any taxable year , it will be subject to federal income taxes and may not be able to qualify as a reit for four subsequent taxable years . reit qualification reduces , but does not eliminate , the amount of state and local taxes paid by the company . in addition , the company 2019s financial statements include the operations of taxable corporate subsidiaries that are not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and are subject to corporate federal , state and local income taxes . as a reit , the company may also be subject to certain federal excise taxes if it engages in certain types of transactions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>basic net income available for common shares</td><td>$ 161272</td><td>$ 229967</td><td>$ 212958</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership net income</td><td>2014</td><td>3423</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>minority interest in earnings of common unitholders</td><td>18568</td><td>32463</td><td>32071</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted net income available for common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>$ 179840</td><td>$ 265853</td><td>$ 245029</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average number of common shares outstanding</td><td>133981</td><td>129660</td><td>126836</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average partnership units outstanding</td><td>15442</td><td>18301</td><td>19070</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership common share equivalents</td><td>2014</td><td>2092</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>dilutive shares for stock-based compensation plans</td><td>1416</td><td>1657</td><td>1535</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>150839</td><td>151710</td><td>147441</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net income available for common shares in 2002?\nAnswer: 161272.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2001?\nAnswer: 229967.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total net income available in both years combined?\nAnswer: 391239.0\nQuestion: including 2000, what becomes this total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "604197.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5368	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninformation about stock options at december 31 , 2007 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2007shares in thousandsrange of exercise prices</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>options outstanding weighted- averageexercise price</td><td>options outstanding weighted-average remaining contractual life ( in years )</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 37.43 2013 $ 46.99</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td><td>4.0</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>47.00 2013 56.99</td><td>3634</td><td>53.43</td><td>5.4</td><td>3022</td><td>53.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>57.00 2013 66.99</td><td>3255</td><td>60.32</td><td>5.2</td><td>2569</td><td>58.96</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>67.00 2013 76.23</td><td>5993</td><td>73.03</td><td>5.5</td><td>3461</td><td>73.45</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>14326</td><td>$ 62.15</td><td>5.3</td><td>10496</td><td>$ 59.95</td></tr></table> ( a ) the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 4.2 years . at december 31 , 2007 , there were approximately 13788000 options in total that were vested and are expected to vest . the weighted-average exercise price of such options was $ 62.07 per share , the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 5.2 years , and the aggregate intrinsic value at december 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 92 million . stock options granted in 2005 include options for 30000 shares that were granted to non-employee directors that year . no such options were granted in 2006 or 2007 . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2007 include 20944 deferred stock units awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment under sfas 123r until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vestings or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on all awarded units on the date of grant . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 11.37 , $ 10.75 and $ 9.83 per option , respectively . to determine stock-based compensation expense under sfas 123r , the grant-date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction made for estimated forfeitures . at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 options for 10743000 and 13582000 shares of common stock , respectively , were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 58.38 and $ 56.58 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 52 million , $ 111 million and $ 31 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2007 the aggregate intrinsic value of all options outstanding and exercisable was $ 94 million and $ 87 million , respectively . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 111 million , $ 233 million and $ 98 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 39 million , $ 82 million and $ 34 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2007 , 2006 or 2005 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 40116726 at december 31 , 2007 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 41787400 shares at december 31 , 2007 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans , the employee stock purchase plan as described below , and a director plan . during 2007 , we issued approximately 2.1 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we intend to utilize treasury stock for future stock option exercises . as discussed in note 1 accounting policies , we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of sfas 123 prospectively to all employee awards including stock options granted , modified or settled after january 1 , 2003 . as permitted under sfas 123 , we recognized compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . total compensation expense recognized related to pnc stock options in 2007 was $ 29 million compared with $ 31 million in 2006 and $ 29 million in 2005 . pro forma effects a table is included in note 1 accounting policies that sets forth pro forma net income and basic and diluted earnings per share as if compensation expense had been recognized under sfas 123 and 123r , as amended , for stock options for 2005 . for purposes of computing stock option expense and 2005 pro forma results , we estimated the fair value of stock options using the black-scholes option pricing model . the model requires the use of numerous assumptions , many of which are very subjective . therefore , the 2005 pro forma results are estimates of results of operations as if compensation expense had been recognized for all stock-based compensation awards and are not indicative of the impact on future periods. .\nQuestion: what was the total intrinsic value of options exercised in the years of 2006 and 2007, combined, in millions?\nAnswer: 163.0\nQuestion: including 2005, what becomes this total?\nAnswer: 194.0\nQuestion: and concerning the weighted-average exercise price for options outstanding, what was the total for the first two years of this period?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "114.96" } ]
CONVFINQA979	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us in measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . compensation for work-related accidents is governed by the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . our personal injury liability activity was as follows : millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 639</td><td>$ 619</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals</td><td>240</td><td>247</td><td>288</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments</td><td>-228 ( 228 )</td><td>-267 ( 267 )</td><td>-268 ( 268 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending balance at december 31</td><td>$ 631</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 639</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current portion ending balance at december 31</td><td>$ 233</td><td>$ 274</td><td>$ 274</td></tr></table> our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 87% ( 87 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 13% ( 13 % ) related to unasserted claims . personal injury accruals were higher in 2004 due to a 1998 crossing accident verdict upheld in 2004 and a 2004 derailment near san antonio . asbestos 2013 we are a defendant in a number of lawsuits in which current and former employees allege exposure to asbestos . additionally , we have received claims for asbestos exposure that have not been litigated . the claims and lawsuits ( collectively referred to as 201cclaims 201d ) allege occupational illness resulting from exposure to asbestos- containing products . in most cases , the claimants do not have credible medical evidence of physical impairment resulting from the alleged exposures . additionally , most claims filed against us do not specify an amount of alleged damages . during 2004 , we engaged a third party with extensive experience in estimating resolution costs for asbestos- related claims to assist us in assessing the number and value of these unasserted claims through 2034 , based on our average claims experience over a multi-year period . as a result , we increased our liability in 2004 for asbestos- related claims in the fourth quarter of 2004 . the liability for resolving both asserted and unasserted claims was based on the following assumptions : 2022 the number of future claims received would be consistent with historical averages . 2022 the number of claims filed against us will decline each year . 2022 the average settlement values for asserted and unasserted claims will be equivalent to historical averages . 2022 the percentage of claims dismissed in the future will be equivalent to historical averages. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in personal injury liability in 2006?\nAnswer: 12.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.01939" } ]
CONVFINQA7721	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 116</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>inventory</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>2549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intangible assets 2014indefinite-lived</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>regulatory assets</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other noncurrent assets</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-401 ( 401 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-recourse debt</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>regulatory liabilities</td><td>-117 ( 117 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>redeemable preferred stock</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>net identifiable assets acquired</td><td>994</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>goodwill</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2011 , the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded at provisional amounts based on the preliminary purchase price allocation . the company is in the process of obtaining additional information to identify and measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition within the measurement period , which could be up to one year from the date of acquisition . such provisional amounts will be retrospectively adjusted to reflect any new information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that , if known , would have affected the measurement of these amounts . additionally , key input assumptions and their sensitivity to the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are currently being reviewed by management . it is likely that the value of the generation business related property , plant and equipment , the intangible asset related to the electric security plan with its regulated customers and long-term coal contracts , the 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) equity ownership interest in the ohio valley electric corporation , and deferred taxes could change as the valuation process is finalized . dpler , dpl 2019s wholly-owned competitive retail electric service ( 201ccres 201d ) provider , will also likely have changes in its initial purchase price allocation for the valuation of its intangible assets for the trade name , and customer relationships and contracts . as noted in the table above , the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in the recognition of $ 2.5 billion of goodwill . factors primarily contributing to a price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets include , but are not limited to : the ability to expand the u.s . utility platform in the mid-west market , the ability to capitalize on utility management experience gained from ipl , enhanced ability to negotiate with suppliers of fuel and energy , the ability to capture value associated with aes 2019 u.s . tax position , a well- positioned generating fleet , the ability of dpl to leverage its assembled workforce to take advantage of growth opportunities , etc . our ability to realize the benefit of dpl 2019s goodwill depends on the realization of expected benefits resulting from a successful integration of dpl into aes 2019 existing operations and our ability to respond to the changes in the ohio utility market . for example , utilities in ohio continue to face downward pressure on operating margins due to the evolving regulatory environment , which is moving towards a market-based competitive pricing mechanism . at the same time , the declining energy prices are also reducing operating .\nQuestion: what amount of the net assets acquired is from goodwill?\nAnswer: 2489.0\nQuestion: and what is the total of those net assets acquired?\nAnswer: 3483.0\nQuestion: what, then, is that amount as a percentage of this total?\nAnswer: 0.71461\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the combined total of the cash and the accounts receivable, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "394.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3072	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe authorized costs of $ 76 are to be recovered via a surcharge over a twenty-year period beginning october 2012 . surcharges collected as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were $ 4 and $ 5 , respectively . in addition to the authorized costs , the company expects to incur additional costs totaling $ 34 , which will be recovered from contributions made by the california state coastal conservancy . contributions collected as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were $ 8 and $ 5 , respectively . regulatory balancing accounts accumulate differences between revenues recognized and authorized revenue requirements until they are collected from customers or are refunded . regulatory balancing accounts include low income programs and purchased power and water accounts . debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues . call premiums on the redemption of long- term debt , as well as unamortized debt expense , are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates . purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the company 2019s california subsidiary during 2002 , and acquisitions in 2007 by the company 2019s new jersey subsidiary . as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 . tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from five to fifteen years , as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service . other regulatory assets include certain deferred business transformation costs , construction costs for treatment facilities , property tax stabilization , employee-related costs , business services project expenses , coastal water project costs , rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others . these costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods . regulatory liabilities the regulatory liabilities generally represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts that are to be credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process . the following table summarizes the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>removal costs recovered through rates</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 301</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefitbalancing accounts</td><td>59</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>32</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total regulatory liabilities</td><td>$ 402</td><td>$ 392</td></tr></table> removal costs recovered through rates are estimated costs to retire assets at the end of their expected useful life that are recovered through customer rates over the life of the associated assets . in december 2008 , the company 2019s subsidiary in new jersey , at the direction of the new jersey puc , began to depreciate $ 48 of the total balance into depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated statements of operations via straight line amortization through november 2048 . pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts represent the difference between costs incurred and costs authorized by the puc 2019s that are expected to be refunded to customers. .\nQuestion: what was the removal costs recovered through rates for 2015?\nAnswer: 311.0\nQuestion: and for 2014?\nAnswer: 301.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in this value between the years?\nAnswer: 10.0\nQuestion: and the growth rate during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.03322" } ]
CONVFINQA9471	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n46 d e v o n e n e r g y a n n u a l r e p o r t 2 0 0 4 contents of gas produced , transportation availability and costs and demand for the various products derived from oil , natural gas and ngls . substantially all of devon 2019s revenues are attributable to sales , processing and transportation of these three commodities . consequently , our financial results and resources are highly influenced by price volatility . estimates for devon 2019s future production of oil , natural gas and ngls are based on the assumption that market demand and prices will continue at levels that allow for profitable production of these products . there can be no assurance of such stability . most of our canadian production is subject to government royalties that fluctuate with prices . thus , price fluctuations can affect reported production . also , our international production is governed by payout agreements with the governments of the countries in which we operate . if the payout under these agreements is attained earlier than projected , devon 2019s net production and proved reserves in such areas could be reduced . estimates for our future processing and transport of oil , natural gas and ngls are based on the assumption that market demand and prices will continue at levels that allow for profitable processing and transport of these products . there can be no assurance of such stability . the production , transportation , processing and marketing of oil , natural gas and ngls are complex processes which are subject to disruption from many causes . these causes include transportation and processing availability , mechanical failure , human error , meteorological events including , but not limited to , hurricanes , and numerous other factors . the following forward-looking statements were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for devon 2019s oil , natural gas and ngls during 2005 will be substantially similar to those of 2004 , unless otherwise noted . unless otherwise noted , all of the following dollar amounts are expressed in u.s . dollars . amounts related to canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using a projected average 2005 exchange rate of $ 0.82 u.s . to $ 1.00 canadian . the actual 2005 exchange rate may vary materially from this estimate . such variations could have a material effect on the following estimates . though we have completed several major property acquisitions and dispositions in recent years , these transactions are opportunity driven . thus , the following forward-looking data excludes the financial and operating effects of potential property acquisitions or divestitures , except as discussed in 201cproperty acquisitions and divestitures , 201d during the year 2005 . the timing and ultimate results of such acquisition and divestiture activity is difficult to predict , and may vary materially from that discussed in this report . geographic reporting areas for 2005 the following estimates of production , average price differentials and capital expenditures are provided separately for each of the following geographic areas : 2022 the united states onshore ; 2022 the united states offshore , which encompasses all oil and gas properties in the gulf of mexico ; 2022 canada ; and 2022 international , which encompasses all oil and gas properties that lie outside of the united states and canada . year 2005 potential operating items the estimates related to oil , gas and ngl production , operating costs and dd&a set forth in the following paragraphs are based on estimates for devon 2019s properties other than those that have been designated for possible sale ( see 201cproperty acquisitions and divestitures 201d ) . therefore , the following estimates exclude the results of the potential sale properties for the entire year . oil , gas and ngl production set forth in the following paragraphs are individual estimates of devon 2019s oil , gas and ngl production for 2005 . on a combined basis , devon estimates its 2005 oil , gas and ngl production will total 217 mmboe . of this total , approximately 92% ( 92 % ) is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31 , 2004 . oil production we expect our oil production in 2005 to total 60 mmbbls . of this total , approximately 95% ( 95 % ) is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31 , 2004 . the expected production by area is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( mmbbls )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states onshore</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>united states offshore</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>canada</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>international</td><td>26</td></tr></table> oil prices 2013 fixed through various price swaps , devon has fixed the price it will receive in 2005 on a portion of its oil production . the following table includes information on this fixed-price production by area . where necessary , the prices have been adjusted for certain transportation costs that are netted against the prices recorded by devon. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2005, what would have been the equivalent, in us dollars, of 20 canadian dollars?\nAnswer: 16.4\nQuestion: and in that same year, what percentage of the expected oil production was not estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31, 2004?\nAnswer: 1.05263\nQuestion: what is this percentage numerically, or as a portion of one?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.01053" } ]
CONVFINQA4971	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements equivalent to the exchangeable shares at the acquisition date as discussed below . additional shares of voting preferred stock will be issued as necessary to adjust the number of votes to account for changes in the exchange ratio . preferred shares 2013 in connection with the acquisition of western discussed in note 6 , the board of directors authorized a class of voting preferred stock consisting of 6 million shares . upon completion of the acquisition , we issued 5 million shares of this voting preferred stock to a trustee , who holds the shares for the benefit of the holders of the exchangeable shares discussed above . each share of voting preferred stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to the holders of marathon common stock . each holder of exchangeable shares may direct the trustee to vote the number of shares of voting preferred stock equal to the number of shares of marathon common stock issuable upon the exchange of the exchangeable shares held by that holder . in no event will the aggregate number of votes entitled to be cast by the trustee with respect to the outstanding shares of voting preferred stock exceed the number of votes entitled to be cast with respect to the outstanding exchangeable shares . except as otherwise provided in our restated certificate of incorporation or by applicable law , the common stock and the voting preferred stock will vote together as a single class in the election of directors of marathon and on all other matters submitted to a vote of stockholders of marathon generally . the voting preferred stock will have no other voting rights except as required by law . other than dividends payable solely in shares of voting preferred stock , no dividend or other distribution , will be paid or payable to the holder of the voting preferred stock . in the event of any liquidation , dissolution or winding up of marathon , the holder of shares of the voting preferred stock will not be entitled to receive any assets of marathon available for distribution to its stockholders . the voting preferred stock is not convertible into any other class or series of the capital stock of marathon or into cash , property or other rights , and may not be redeemed . 25 . leases we lease a wide variety of facilities and equipment under operating leases , including land and building space , office equipment , production facilities and transportation equipment . most long-term leases include renewal options and , in certain leases , purchase options . future minimum commitments for capital lease obligations ( including sale-leasebacks accounted for as financings ) and for operating lease obligations having initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows : ( in millions ) capital lease obligations ( a ) operating obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>capital lease obligations ( a )</td><td>operating lease obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 46</td><td>$ 165</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>45</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>58</td><td>121</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>44</td><td>102</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>44</td><td>84</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>466</td><td>313</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>sublease rentals</td><td>-</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 703</td><td>$ 909</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less imputed interest costs</td><td>-257 ( 257 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 446</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( a ) capital lease obligations include $ 164 million related to assets under construction as of december 31 , 2009 . these leases are currently reported in long-term debt based on percentage of construction completed at $ 36 million . in connection with past sales of various plants and operations , we assigned and the purchasers assumed certain leases of major equipment used in the divested plants and operations of united states steel . in the event of a default by any of the purchasers , united states steel has assumed these obligations ; however , we remain primarily obligated for payments under these leases . minimum lease payments under these operating lease obligations of $ 16 million have been included above and an equal amount has been reported as sublease rentals. .\nQuestion: what percentage of the total minimum lease payments related to operating lease obligations are due in 2010?\nAnswer: 0.18152\nQuestion: and what were those total minimum lease payments related to capital lease obligations?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "703.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5979	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfive-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2015 , we repurchased 36921641 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 99.16 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2015 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>3247731</td><td>$ 92.98</td><td>3221153</td><td>56078192</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>2325865</td><td>86.61</td><td>2322992</td><td>53755200</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>1105389</td><td>77.63</td><td>1102754</td><td>52652446</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6678985</td><td>$ 88.22</td><td>6646899</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 32086 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2017 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .\nQuestion: what percentage of the total number of shares purchased in november for the 4th quarter ended 12/31/15?\nAnswer: 0.34824\nQuestion: for the same quarter, what was the percentage of the total number of shares purchased that was attributable to the employees to pay stock option exercise prices, and satisfy excess tax withholding obligations?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.0048" } ]
CONVFINQA3179	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2224</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014</td><td>-305 ( 305 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1666</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .\nQuestion: what was the tax benefit from the the stipulated settlement in the business combination granting customer credits in 2015?\nAnswer: 41.0\nQuestion: and what was the net revenue in that same year?\nAnswer: 2224.0\nQuestion: what was that net revenue in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1666.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6954	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvolatility of capital markets or macroeconomic factors could adversely affect our business . changes in financial and capital markets , including market disruptions , limited liquidity , uncertainty regarding brexit , and interest rate volatility , including as a result of the use or discontinued use of certain benchmark rates such as libor , may increase the cost of financing as well as the risks of refinancing maturing debt . in addition , our borrowing costs can be affected by short and long-term ratings assigned by rating organizations . a decrease in these ratings could limit our access to capital markets and increase our borrowing costs , which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and operating results . some of our customers and counterparties are highly leveraged . consolidations in some of the industries in which our customers operate have created larger customers , some of which are highly leveraged and facing increased competition and continued credit market volatility . these factors have caused some customers to be less profitable , increasing our exposure to credit risk . a significant adverse change in the financial and/or credit position of a customer or counterparty could require us to assume greater credit risk relating to that customer or counterparty and could limit our ability to collect receivables . this could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and liquidity . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois . our co-headquarters are leased and house certain executive offices , our u.s . business units , and our administrative , finance , legal , and human resource functions . we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate . we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world . as of december 29 , 2018 , we operated 84 manufacturing and processing facilities . we own 81 and lease three of these facilities . our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 29 , 2018 was: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>owned</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>40</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>12</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rest of world</td><td>27</td><td>2</td></tr></table> we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs . we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products . in the fourth quarter of 2018 , we announced our plans to divest certain assets and operations , predominantly in canada and india , including one owned manufacturing facility in canada and one owned and one leased facility in india . see note 5 , acquisitions and divestitures , in item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , for additional information on these transactions . item 3 . legal proceedings . see note 18 , commitments and contingencies , in item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable . part ii item 5 . market for registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . our common stock is listed on nasdaq under the ticker symbol 201ckhc 201d . at june 5 , 2019 , there were approximately 49000 holders of record of our common stock . see equity and dividends in item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , for a discussion of cash dividends declared on our common stock. .\nQuestion: what is the number of facilities located in the united states?\nAnswer: 41.0\nQuestion: and how much does that number represent in relation to the total number of facilities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.4881" } ]
CONVFINQA6536	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n82 \| 2017 form 10-k a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions , including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits , follows . reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:1 years a0ended a0december a031 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1,</td><td>$ 1032</td><td>$ 968</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions related to current year</td><td>270</td><td>73</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>20</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for settlements2</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>2014</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31,</td><td>$ 1286</td><td>$ 1032</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate</td><td>$ 1209</td><td>$ 963</td></tr></table> 1 foreign currency impacts are included within each line as applicable . 2 includes cash payment or other reduction of assets to settle liability . we classify interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes . we recognized a net provision for interest and penalties of $ 38 million , $ 34 million and $ 20 million during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the total amount of interest and penalties accrued was $ 157 million and $ 120 million as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . on january 31 , 2018 , we received a revenue agent 2019s report from the irs indicating the end of the field examination of our u.s . income tax returns for 2010 to 2012 . in the audits of 2007 to 2012 including the impact of a loss carryback to 2005 , the irs has proposed to tax in the united states profits earned from certain parts transactions by csarl , based on the irs examination team 2019s application of the 201csubstance-over-form 201d or 201cassignment-of-income 201d judicial doctrines . we are vigorously contesting the proposed increases to tax and penalties for these years of approximately $ 2.3 billion . we believe that the relevant transactions complied with applicable tax laws and did not violate judicial doctrines . we have filed u.s . income tax returns on this same basis for years after 2012 . based on the information currently available , we do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease to our unrecognized tax benefits for this matter within the next 12 months . we currently believe the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations . with the exception of a loss carryback to 2005 , tax years prior to 2007 are generally no longer subject to u.s . tax assessment . in our major non-u.s . jurisdictions including australia , brazil , china , germany , japan , mexico , switzerland , singapore and the u.k. , tax years are typically subject to examination for three to ten years . due to the uncertainty related to the timing and potential outcome of audits , we cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible change in unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. .\nQuestion: what was the proportion of the total amount of interest and penalties accrued in 2017 to 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.30833" } ]
CONVFINQA10004	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the units consisted of ( i ) approximately 81.8 million preferred a units par value $ 1.00 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the preferred a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after one year or callable by the company any time after six months and contain a promote feature based upon an increase in net operating income of the properties capped at a 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) increase , ( ii ) 2000 class a preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to libor plus 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) per annum on the class a preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , ( iii ) 2627 class b-1 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-1 preferred par value and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock , equal to the cash redemption amount , as defined , ( iv ) 5673 class b-2 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-2 preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , and ( v ) 640001 class c downreit units , valued at an issuance price of $ 30.52 per unit which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock equal to the class c cash amount , as defined . the following units have been redeemed as of december 31 , 2010 : redeemed par value redeemed ( in millions ) redemption type . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>units redeemed</td><td>par value redeemed ( in millions )</td><td>redemption type</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>preferred a units</td><td>2200000</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a preferred units</td><td>2000</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 preferred units</td><td>2438</td><td>$ 24.4</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 preferred units</td><td>5576</td><td>$ 55.8</td><td>cash/charitable contribution</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class c downreit units</td><td>61804</td><td>$ 1.9</td><td>cash</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $ 110.4 million and $ 113.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2006 , the company acquired two shopping center properties located in bay shore and centereach , ny . included in noncontrolling interests was approximately $ 41.6 million , including a discount of $ 0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $ 3.8 million , in redeemable units ( the 201credeemable units 201d ) , issued by the company in connection with these transactions . the prop- erties were acquired through the issuance of $ 24.2 million of redeemable units , which are redeemable at the option of the holder ; approximately $ 14.0 million of fixed rate redeemable units and the assumption of approximately $ 23.4 million of non-recourse debt . the redeemable units consist of ( i ) 13963 class a units , par value $ 1000 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 5% ( 5 % ) per annum of the class a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2011 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2016 , and ( ii ) 647758 class b units , valued at an issuance price of $ 37.24 per unit , which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2007 , for cash or at the option of the company for common stock at a ratio of 1:1 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2026 . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until april 2016 and april 2026 for the centereach , ny , and bay shore , ny , assets , respectively . during 2007 , 30000 units , or $ 1.1 million par value , of theclass bunits were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the company . noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $ 40.4 million and $ 40.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . noncontrolling interests also includes 138015 convertible units issued during 2006 , by the company , which were valued at approxi- mately $ 5.3 million , including a fair market value adjustment of $ 0.3 million , related to an interest acquired in an office building located in albany , ny . these units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the company for the company 2019s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 . the holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the company 2019s common stock . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until january 2017. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units from 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: -2.7\nQuestion: and what was that noncontrolling interest in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "113.1" } ]
CONVFINQA10988	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 114 jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable counterparties to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange- traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 24673</td><td>$ 28302</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>869</td><td>1294</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>16151</td><td>23271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity</td><td>7882</td><td>4939</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>6948</td><td>6272</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>56523</td><td>64078</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td><td>-22705 ( 22705 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 40415</td><td>$ 41373</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained . derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 56.5 billion and $ 64.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . derivative receivables decreased predominantly as a result of client- driven market-making activities in cib markets , which reduced foreign exchange and interest rate derivative receivables , and increased equity derivative receivables , driven by market movements . derivative receivables amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 16.1 billion and $ 22.7 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative transactions , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 29.0 billion and $ 31.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 40.4 billion and $ 41.4 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates cva to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential .\nQuestion: in 2017, what was the amount of the total net of cash collateral that was foreign exchange?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "16151.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2276	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>receivables from customers</td><td>$ 19215</td><td>$ 10374</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations</td><td>19169</td><td>18513</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total brokerage receivables ( 1 )</td><td>$ 38384</td><td>$ 28887</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>payables to customers</td><td>$ 38741</td><td>$ 37237</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations</td><td>22601</td><td>19915</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total brokerage payables ( 1 )</td><td>$ 61342</td><td>$ 57152</td></tr></table> payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .\nQuestion: what were the total brokerage payables in 2017?\nAnswer: 61342.0\nQuestion: and what were they in 2016?\nAnswer: 57152.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4190.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7238	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )</td><td>total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms</td><td>approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2017</td><td>515762</td><td>$ 77.15</td><td>292145</td><td>223617</td><td>$ 1.6 billion</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2017</td><td>2186889</td><td>$ 81.21</td><td>216415</td><td>1970474</td><td>$ 1.4 billion</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2017</td><td>2330263</td><td>$ 87.76</td><td>798</td><td>2329465</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5032914</td><td>$ 83.83</td><td>509358</td><td>4523556</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr></table> ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .\nQuestion: what was the share price in november 2017?\nAnswer: 81.21\nQuestion: what was it in october 2017?\nAnswer: 77.15\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.06" } ]
CONVFINQA6325	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 92.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher net revenue . the higher other operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from the write-off of approximately $ 70.8 million of costs as a result of the december 2008 arkansas court of appeals decision in entergy arkansas' base rate case . the base rate case is discussed in more detail in note 2 to the financial statements . 2007 compared to 2006 net income decreased $ 34.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>13.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>4.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-14.6 ( 14.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>3.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 1117.9</td></tr></table> the rider revenue variance is primarily due to an energy efficiency rider which became effective in november 2007 . the establishment of the rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no effect on net income . also contributing to the variance was an increase in franchise tax rider revenue as a result of higher retail revenues . the corresponding increase is in taxes other than income taxes , resulting in no effect on net income . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization expenses . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods compared to 2007 and a 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) volume decrease in industrial sales , primarily in the wood industry and the small customer class . billed electricity usage decreased 333 gwh in all sectors . see \"critical accounting estimates\" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. .\nQuestion: what was the net revenue in 2008 for entergy arkansas, in millions?\nAnswer: 1117.9\nQuestion: and what was it in 2007, also in millions?\nAnswer: 1110.6\nQuestion: what was, then, in millions, the change in net revenue over the year?\nAnswer: 7.3\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to the net revenue in 2007 for entergy arkansas, as counted in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.00657" } ]
CONVFINQA4568	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nadditionally , the latin american soft alloy extrusions business previously included in corporate was moved into the new transportation and construction solutions segment . the remaining engineered products and solutions segment consists of the alcoa fastening systems and rings ( renamed to include portions of the firth rixson business acquired in november 2014 ) , alcoa power and propulsion ( includes the tital business acquired in march 2015 ) , alcoa forgings and extrusions ( includes the other portions of firth rixson ) , and alcoa titanium and engineered products ( a new business unit that consists solely of the rti international metals business acquired in july 2015 ) business units . segment information for all prior periods presented was updated to reflect the new segment structure . atoi for all reportable segments totaled $ 1906 in 2015 , $ 1968 in 2014 , and $ 1267 in 2013 . the following information provides shipments , sales , and atoi data for each reportable segment , as well as certain production , realized price , and average cost data , for each of the three years in the period ended december 31 , 2015 . see note q to the consolidated financial statements in part ii item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . alumina . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alumina production ( kmt )</td><td>15720</td><td>16606</td><td>16618</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third-party alumina shipments ( kmt )</td><td>10755</td><td>10652</td><td>9966</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of alumina</td><td>$ 317</td><td>$ 324</td><td>$ 328</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>alcoa 2019s average cost per metric ton of alumina</td><td>$ 237</td><td>$ 282</td><td>$ 295</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 3455</td><td>$ 3509</td><td>$ 3326</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>1687</td><td>1941</td><td>2235</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 5142</td><td>$ 5450</td><td>$ 5561</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 746</td><td>$ 370</td><td>$ 259</td></tr></table> includes all production-related costs , including raw materials consumed ; conversion costs , such as labor , materials , and utilities ; depreciation , depletion , and amortization ; and plant administrative expenses . this segment represents a portion of alcoa 2019s upstream operations and consists of the company 2019s worldwide refining system . alumina mines bauxite , from which alumina is produced and then sold directly to external smelter customers , as well as to the primary metals segment ( see primary metals below ) , or to customers who process it into industrial chemical products . more than half of alumina 2019s production is sold under supply contracts to third parties worldwide , while the remainder is used internally by the primary metals segment . alumina produced by this segment and used internally is transferred to the primary metals segment at prevailing market prices . a portion of this segment 2019s third- party sales are completed through the use of agents , alumina traders , and distributors . generally , the sales of this segment are transacted in u.s . dollars while costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are the australian dollar , the brazilian real , the u.s . dollar , and the euro . awac is an unincorporated global joint venture between alcoa and alumina limited and consists of a number of affiliated operating entities , which own , or have an interest in , or operate the bauxite mines and alumina refineries within the alumina segment ( except for the poc 0327os de caldas refinery in brazil and a portion of the sa 0303o lul 0301s refinery in brazil ) . alcoa owns 60% ( 60 % ) and alumina limited owns 40% ( 40 % ) of these individual entities , which are consolidated by the company for financial reporting purposes . as such , the results and analysis presented for the alumina segment are inclusive of alumina limited 2019s 40% ( 40 % ) interest . in december 2014 , awac completed the sale of its ownership stake in jamalco , a bauxite mine and alumina refinery joint venture in jamaica , to noble group ltd . jamalco was 55% ( 55 % ) owned by a subsidiary of awac , and , while owned by awac , 55% ( 55 % ) of both the operating results and assets and liabilities of this joint venture were included in the alumina segment . as it relates to awac 2019s previous 55% ( 55 % ) ownership stake , the refinery ( awac 2019s share of the capacity was 779 kmt-per-year ) generated sales ( third-party and intersegment ) of approximately $ 200 in 2013 , and the refinery and mine combined , at the time of divestiture , had approximately 500 employees . see restructuring and other charges in results of operations above. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2013, what were the intersegment sales as a percentage of the total sales?\nAnswer: 0.40191\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\nAnswer: 0.35615\nQuestion: what was, then, the decline in the percentage representation of the intersegment sales over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.04576" } ]
CONVFINQA6135	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 49</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>63</td><td>80</td><td>92</td><td>94</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>45</td><td>52</td><td>59</td><td>49</td><td>63</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of state street in 2009?\nAnswer: 55.0\nQuestion: what was the initial value invested?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\nAnswer: -45.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.45" } ]
CONVFINQA10156	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .\nQuestion: what was the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11.6" } ]
CONVFINQA10017	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmaturities of long-term debt in each of the next five years and beyond are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 907.4</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>453.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>453.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>439.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2876.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5563.7</td></tr></table> on 4 february 2013 , we issued a $ 400.0 senior fixed-rate 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) note that matures on 3 february 2023 . additionally , on 7 august 2013 , we issued a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) eurobond for 20ac300 million ( $ 397 ) that matures on 7 august 2020 . various debt agreements to which we are a party also include financial covenants and other restrictions , including restrictions pertaining to the ability to create property liens and enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions . as of 30 september 2013 , we are in compliance with all the financial and other covenants under our debt agreements . as of 30 september 2013 , we have classified commercial paper of $ 400.0 maturing in 2014 as long-term debt because we have the ability and intent to refinance the debt under our $ 2500.0 committed credit facility maturing in 2018 . our current intent is to refinance this debt via the u.s . public or private placement markets . on 30 april 2013 , we entered into a five-year $ 2500.0 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks ( the 201c2013 credit agreement 201d ) , under which senior unsecured debt is available to us and certain of our subsidiaries . the 2013 credit agreement provides us with a source of liquidity and supports our commercial paper program . this agreement increases the previously existing facility by $ 330.0 , extends the maturity date to 30 april 2018 , and modifies the financial covenant to a maximum ratio of total debt to total capitalization ( total debt plus total equity plus redeemable noncontrolling interest ) no greater than 70% ( 70 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the 2013 credit agreement as of 30 september 2013 . the 2013 credit agreement terminates and replaces our previous $ 2170.0 revolving credit agreement dated 8 july 2010 , as subsequently amended , which was to mature 30 june 2015 and had a financial covenant of long-term debt divided by the sum of long-term debt plus equity of no greater than 60% ( 60 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the previous agreement at the time of its termination and no early termination penalties were incurred . effective 11 june 2012 , we entered into an offshore chinese renminbi ( rmb ) syndicated credit facility of rmb1000.0 million ( $ 163.5 ) , maturing in june 2015 . there are rmb250.0 million ( $ 40.9 ) in outstanding borrowings under this commitment at 30 september 2013 . additional commitments totaling $ 383.0 are maintained by our foreign subsidiaries , of which $ 309.0 was borrowed and outstanding at 30 september 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the senior fixed-rate in 2013?\nAnswer: 0.0275\nQuestion: and what is the sum of the number one and this percentage as a portion of the number one?\nAnswer: 1.0275\nQuestion: considering that this senior fixed rate accumulates on top of the previous one, what will be its total cumulative value at the end of ten years?\nAnswer: 1.31165\nQuestion: what was the issued amount in 2013?\nAnswer: 400.0\nQuestion: what, then, is going to be the total matured value of this amount at the end of those ten years, considering the cumulative senior fixed rate?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "524.66041" } ]
CONVFINQA132	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof . we have , as discussed previously , issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to the shelf registration . the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors . additional information about debt and equity securities issued pursuant to this shelf registration is provided in notes 9 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . we currently maintain a corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3 billion with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issue . at december 31 , 2011 , we had $ 2.38 billion of commercial paper outstanding , compared to $ 2.80 billion at december 31 , 2010 . additional information about our corporate commercial paper program is provided in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . state street bank had initial board authority to issue bank notes up to an aggregate of $ 5 billion , including up to $ 1 billion of subordinated bank notes . approximately $ 2.05 billion was available under this board authority as of december 31 , 2011 . in 2011 , $ 2.45 billion of senior notes , which were outstanding at december 31 , 2010 , matured . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 787 million as of december 31 , 2011 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2011 , no balance was outstanding on this line of credit . contractual cash obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31 2011 ( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period less than 1 year</td><td>payments due by period 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period 4-5 years</td><td>payments due by period over 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>$ 9276</td><td>$ 1973</td><td>$ 1169</td><td>$ 1944</td><td>$ 4190</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating leases</td><td>1129</td><td>237</td><td>389</td><td>228</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>989</td><td>68</td><td>136</td><td>138</td><td>647</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual cash obligations</td><td>$ 11394</td><td>$ 2278</td><td>$ 1694</td><td>$ 2310</td><td>$ 5112</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) long-term debt excludes capital lease obligations ( presented as a separate line item ) and the effect of interest-rate swaps . interest payments were calculated at the stated rate with the exception of floating-rate debt , for which payments were calculated using the indexed rate in effect as of december 31 , 2011 . the obligations presented in the table above are recorded in our consolidated statement of condition at december 31 , 2011 , except for interest on long-term debt and capital lease obligations . the table does not include obligations which will be settled in cash , primarily in less than one year , such as deposits , federal funds purchased , securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings . additional information about deposits , federal funds purchased , securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings is provided in notes 7 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the table does not include obligations related to derivative instruments , because the amounts included in our consolidated statement of condition at december 31 , 2011 related to derivatives do not represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid under the contracts upon settlement . additional information about derivative contracts is provided in note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . we have obligations under pension and other post-retirement benefit plans , more fully described in note 18 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 , which are not included in the above table . additional information about contractual cash obligations related to long-term debt and operating and capital leases is provided in notes 9 and 19 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the consolidated statement of cash flows , also included under item 8 , provides additional liquidity information. .\nQuestion: what was the value of commercial paper outstanding in 2011?\nAnswer: 2.8\nQuestion: what was the value in 2010?\nAnswer: 2.38\nQuestion: what was the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.42" } ]
CONVFINQA184	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american and european cruise guests over the past five years : weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths global cruise guests ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths</td><td>globalcruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>north americancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>363000</td><td>84050</td><td>17340000</td><td>10198000</td><td>5000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>391000</td><td>92300</td><td>18800000</td><td>10781000</td><td>5540000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>412000</td><td>92650</td><td>20227000</td><td>11625000</td><td>5894000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>425000</td><td>98650</td><td>20898000</td><td>11640000</td><td>6139000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>432000</td><td>98750</td><td>21300000</td><td>11816000</td><td>6399000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a com- bination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider , cruise industry news and cruise line international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2009 through 2012 . year 2013 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 3 ) source : clia europe , formerly european cruise council , for years 2009 through 2012 . year 2013 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . north america the majority of cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 56% ( 56 % ) of global cruise guests in 2013 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) from 2009 to 2013 . europe cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of global cruise guests in 2013 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) from 2009 to 2013 . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . based on industry data , cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) of global cruise guests in 2013 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 15% ( 15 % ) from 2011 to 2013 . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our princi- pal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consumers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influenced by political and general economic conditions . com- panies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues , our brands globally , expenditures and ensure adequate cash and liquid- ity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , ization and maintenance of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while prudently expanding our fleet with new state-of- the-art cruise ships , ships by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , service customer preferences and expectations in an innovative manner , while supporting our strategic focus on profitability , and .\nQuestion: in 2013, what was the total of global cruise guests from either north america or europe?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "18215000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3113	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmasco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . segment information ( continued ) ( 1 ) included in net sales were export sales from the u.s . of $ 229 million , $ 241 million and $ 246 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 2 ) excluded from net sales were intra-company sales between segments of approximately two percent of net sales in each of 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . ( 3 ) included in net sales were sales to one customer of $ 2143 million , $ 1984 million and $ 1993 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . such net sales were included in the following segments : cabinets and related products , plumbing products , decorative architectural products and other specialty products . ( 4 ) net sales from the company 2019s operations in the u.s . were $ 5793 million , $ 5394 million and $ 5618 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 5 ) net sales , operating ( loss ) profit , property additions and depreciation and amortization expense for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 excluded the results of businesses reported as discontinued operations in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . ( 6 ) included in segment operating profit ( loss ) for 2012 was an impairment charge for other intangible assets as follows : other specialty products 2013 $ 42 million . included in segment operating ( loss ) profit for 2011 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : cabinets and related products 2013 $ 44 million ; plumbing products 2013 $ 1 million ; decorative architectural products 2013 $ 75 million ; and other specialty products 2013 $ 374 million . included in segment operating ( loss ) profit for 2010 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : plumbing products 2013 $ 1 million ; and installation and other services 2013 $ 697 million . ( 7 ) general corporate expense , net included those expenses not specifically attributable to the company 2019s segments . ( 8 ) the charge for litigation settlement , net in 2012 primarily relates to a business in the installation and other services segment and in 2011 relates to business units in the cabinets and related products and the other specialty products segments . ( 9 ) long-lived assets of the company 2019s operations in the u.s . and europe were $ 2795 million and $ 567 million , $ 2964 million and $ 565 million , and $ 3684 million and $ 617 million at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 10 ) segment assets for 2012 and 2011 excluded the assets of businesses reported as discontinued operations in the respective years . p . severance costs as part of the company 2019s continuing review of its operations , actions were taken during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 to respond to market conditions . the company recorded charges related to severance and early retirement programs of $ 36 million , $ 17 million and $ 14 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . such charges are principally reflected in the statement of operations in selling , general and administrative expenses and were paid when incurred . q . other income ( expense ) , net other , net , which is included in other income ( expense ) , net , was as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from cash and cash investments</td><td>$ 6</td><td>$ 8</td><td>$ 6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other interest income</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income from financial investments net ( note e )</td><td>24</td><td>73</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other items net</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total other net</td><td>$ 27</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 7</td></tr></table> other items , net , included realized foreign currency transaction losses of $ 2 million , $ 5 million and $ 2 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , as well as other miscellaneous items. .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of company recorded charges related to severance and early retirement programs in 2011 and 2012?\nAnswer: 19.0\nQuestion: what is that divided by the 2011 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.11765" } ]
CONVFINQA9742	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nestimated future pension benefit payments for the next ten years under the plan ( in millions ) are as follows : estimated future payments: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 14.9</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>15.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>16.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>19.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>21.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014 through 2018</td><td>142.2</td></tr></table> bfi post retirement healthcare plan we acquired obligations under the bfi post retirement healthcare plan as part of our acquisition of allied . this plan provides continued medical coverage for certain former employees following their retirement , including some employees subject to collective bargaining agreements . eligibility for this plan is limited to certain of those employees who had ten or more years of service and were age 55 or older as of december 31 , 1998 , and certain employees in california who were hired on or before december 31 , 2005 and who retire on or after age 55 with at least thirty years of service . liabilities acquired for this plan were $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , at the acquisition date and at december 31 , 2008 . multi-employer pension plans we contribute to 25 multi-employer pension plans under collective bargaining agreements covering union- represented employees . we acquired responsibility for contributions for a portion of these plans as part of our acquisition of allied . approximately 22% ( 22 % ) of our total current employees are participants in such multi- employer plans . these plans generally provide retirement benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers . we do not administer these multi-employer plans . in general , these plans are managed by a board of trustees with the unions appointing certain trustees and other contributing employers of the plan appointing certain members . we generally are not represented on the board of trustees . we do not have current plan financial information from the plans 2019 administrators , but based on the information available to us , it is possible that some of the multi-employer plans to which we contribute may be underfunded . the pension protection act , enacted in august 2006 , requires underfunded pension plans to improve their funding ratios within prescribed intervals based on the level of their underfunding . until the plan trustees develop the funding improvement plans or rehabilitation plans as required by the pension protection act , we are unable to determine the amount of assessments we may be subject to , if any . accordingly , we cannot determine at this time the impact that the pension protection act may have on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . furthermore , under current law regarding multi-employer benefit plans , a plan 2019s termination , our voluntary withdrawal , or the mass withdrawal of all contributing employers from any under-funded , multi-employer pension plan would require us to make payments to the plan for our proportionate share of the multi- employer plan 2019s unfunded vested liabilities . it is possible that there may be a mass withdrawal of employers contributing to these plans or plans may terminate in the near future . we could have adjustments to our estimates for these matters in the near term that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . our pension expense for multi-employer plans was $ 21.8 million , $ 18.9 million and $ 17.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . republic services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements %%transmsg* transmitting job : p14076 pcn : 133000000 *%%pcmsg\|131 \|00027\|yes\|no\|02/28/2009 21:12\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what is the net change in estimated future pension benefit payments from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: 3.0\nQuestion: what is the estimated future pension benefit payment in 2011?\nAnswer: 16.2\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.18519" } ]
CONVFINQA5126	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbhge 2017 form 10-k \| 103 part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance information regarding our code of conduct , the spirit and the letter , and code of ethical conduct certificates for our principal executive officer , principal financial officer and principal accounting officer are described in item 1 . business of this annual report . information concerning our directors is set forth in the sections entitled \"proposal no . 1 , election of directors - board nominees for directors\" and \"corporate governance - committees of the board\" in our definitive proxy statement for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the sec pursuant to the exchange act within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year on december 31 , 2017 ( \"proxy statement\" ) , which sections are incorporated herein by reference . for information regarding our executive officers , see \"item 1 . business - executive officers of baker hughes\" in this annual report on form 10-k . additional information regarding compliance by directors and executive officers with section 16 ( a ) of the exchange act is set forth under the section entitled \"section 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance\" in our proxy statement , which section is incorporated herein by reference . item 11 . executive compensation information for this item is set forth in the following sections of our proxy statement , which sections are incorporated herein by reference : \"compensation discussion and analysis\" \"director compensation\" \"compensation committee interlocks and insider participation\" and \"compensation committee report.\" item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and our management is set forth in the sections entitled \"stock ownership of certain beneficial owners\" and 201cstock ownership of section 16 ( a ) director and executive officers 201d ) in our proxy statement , which sections are incorporated herein by reference . we permit our employees , officers and directors to enter into written trading plans complying with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act . rule 10b5-1 provides criteria under which such an individual may establish a prearranged plan to buy or sell a specified number of shares of a company's stock over a set period of time . any such plan must be entered into in good faith at a time when the individual is not in possession of material , nonpublic information . if an individual establishes a plan satisfying the requirements of rule 10b5-1 , such individual's subsequent receipt of material , nonpublic information will not prevent transactions under the plan from being executed . certain of our officers have advised us that they have and may enter into stock sales plans for the sale of shares of our class a common stock which are intended to comply with the requirements of rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act . in addition , the company has and may in the future enter into repurchases of our class a common stock under a plan that complies with rule 10b5-1 or rule 10b-18 of the exchange act . equity compensation plan information the information in the following table is presented as of december 31 , 2017 with respect to shares of our class a common stock that may be issued under our lti plan which has been approved by our stockholders ( in millions , except per share prices ) . equity compensation plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in the first column ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>equity compensation plancategory</td><td>number ofsecurities to beissued uponexercise ofoutstandingoptions warrantsand rights</td><td>weighted averageexercise price ofoutstandingoptions warrantsand rights</td><td>number of securitiesremaining availablefor future issuanceunder equitycompensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in the firstcolumn )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>stockholder-approved plans</td><td>1.6</td><td>$ 36.61</td><td>53.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nonstockholder-approved plans</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1.6</td><td>$ 36.61</td><td>53.7</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?\nAnswer: 55.3\nQuestion: what is the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights?\nAnswer: 1.6\nQuestion: what is that divided by the sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.02893" } ]
CONVFINQA6987	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents the following discussion of nonoperating income and expense excludes the results of the merger in order to provide a more meaningful year-over-year comparison . interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 249 million in 2014 from 2013 primarily due to a $ 149 million decrease in special charges recognized year-over-year as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 100 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . ( 1 ) in 2014 , we recognized $ 33 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , we recognized $ 138 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 we recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . ( 2 ) as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , we recognized $ 100 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to 2013 . other nonoperating expense , net in 2014 consisted of $ 114 million of net foreign currency losses , including a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses , and $ 56 million in other nonoperating special charges primarily due to early debt extinguishment costs related to the prepayment of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . the foreign currency losses were driven primarily by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar relative to other currencies during 2014 , principally in the latin american market , including a 48% ( 48 % ) decrease in the value of the venezuelan bolivar and a 14% ( 14 % ) decrease in the value of the brazilian real . other nonoperating expense , net in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 56 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on aag 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>325</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2655</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , we agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing .\nQuestion: what was the amount of the labor-related deemed claim in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1733.0" } ]
CONVFINQA57	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>backlog</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>4</td></tr></table> income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. .\nQuestion: what was the weighted average useful life for trademarks?\nAnswer: 9.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the average annual amortization expense for that segment?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11.11111" } ]
CONVFINQA2347	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nestimated future pension benefit payments for the next ten years under the plan ( in millions ) are as follows : estimated future payments: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 14.9</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>15.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>16.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>19.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>21.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014 through 2018</td><td>142.2</td></tr></table> bfi post retirement healthcare plan we acquired obligations under the bfi post retirement healthcare plan as part of our acquisition of allied . this plan provides continued medical coverage for certain former employees following their retirement , including some employees subject to collective bargaining agreements . eligibility for this plan is limited to certain of those employees who had ten or more years of service and were age 55 or older as of december 31 , 1998 , and certain employees in california who were hired on or before december 31 , 2005 and who retire on or after age 55 with at least thirty years of service . liabilities acquired for this plan were $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , at the acquisition date and at december 31 , 2008 . multi-employer pension plans we contribute to 25 multi-employer pension plans under collective bargaining agreements covering union- represented employees . we acquired responsibility for contributions for a portion of these plans as part of our acquisition of allied . approximately 22% ( 22 % ) of our total current employees are participants in such multi- employer plans . these plans generally provide retirement benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers . we do not administer these multi-employer plans . in general , these plans are managed by a board of trustees with the unions appointing certain trustees and other contributing employers of the plan appointing certain members . we generally are not represented on the board of trustees . we do not have current plan financial information from the plans 2019 administrators , but based on the information available to us , it is possible that some of the multi-employer plans to which we contribute may be underfunded . the pension protection act , enacted in august 2006 , requires underfunded pension plans to improve their funding ratios within prescribed intervals based on the level of their underfunding . until the plan trustees develop the funding improvement plans or rehabilitation plans as required by the pension protection act , we are unable to determine the amount of assessments we may be subject to , if any . accordingly , we cannot determine at this time the impact that the pension protection act may have on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . furthermore , under current law regarding multi-employer benefit plans , a plan 2019s termination , our voluntary withdrawal , or the mass withdrawal of all contributing employers from any under-funded , multi-employer pension plan would require us to make payments to the plan for our proportionate share of the multi- employer plan 2019s unfunded vested liabilities . it is possible that there may be a mass withdrawal of employers contributing to these plans or plans may terminate in the near future . we could have adjustments to our estimates for these matters in the near term that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . our pension expense for multi-employer plans was $ 21.8 million , $ 18.9 million and $ 17.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . republic services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements %%transmsg* transmitting job : p14076 pcn : 133000000 *%%pcmsg\|131 \|00027\|yes\|no\|02/28/2009 21:12\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what was the estimated future pension benefit payments increase from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: 3.0\nQuestion: and what is this increase as a percentage of those payments in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.18519" } ]
CONVFINQA9837	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nuncertain tax positions the following is a reconciliation of the company's beginning and ending amount of uncertain tax positions ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 191</td><td>$ 164</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>31</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>53</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>business combinations</td><td>2014</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 218</td><td>$ 191</td></tr></table> the company's liability for uncertain tax positions as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , includes $ 180 million , $ 154 million , and $ 141 million , respectively , related to amounts that would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . it is possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect the change to have a significant impact on our consolidated statements of income or consolidated balance sheets . these changes may be the result of settlements of ongoing audits . at this time , an estimate of the range of the reasonably possible outcomes within the twelve months cannot be made . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in its provision for income taxes . the company accrued potential interest and penalties of $ 2 million , $ 4 million , and $ 2 million in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recorded a liability for interest and penalties of $ 33 million , $ 31 million , and $ 27 million as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in their respective jurisdictions . the company has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2007 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2005 . the company has concluded income tax examinations in its primary non-u.s . jurisdictions through 2005 . 9 . shareholders' equity distributable reserves as a u.k . incorporated company , the company is required under u.k . law to have available \"distributable reserves\" to make share repurchases or pay dividends to shareholders . distributable reserves may be created through the earnings of the u.k . parent company and , amongst other methods , through a reduction in share capital approved by the english companies court . distributable reserves are not linked to a u.s . gaap reported amount ( e.g. , retained earnings ) . as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , the company had distributable reserves in excess of $ 2.1 billion and $ 4.0 billion , respectively . ordinary shares in april 2012 , the company's board of directors authorized a share repurchase program under which up to $ 5.0 billion of class a ordinary shares may be repurchased ( \"2012 share repurchase program\" ) . in november 2014 , the company's board of directors authorized a new $ 5.0 billion share repurchase program in addition to the existing program ( \"2014 share repurchase program\" and , together , the \"repurchase programs\" ) . under each program , shares may be repurchased through the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , based on prevailing market conditions , funded from available capital . during 2015 , the company repurchased 16.0 million shares at an average price per share of $ 97.04 for a total cost of $ 1.6 billion under the repurchase programs . during 2014 , the company repurchased 25.8 million shares at an average price per share of $ 87.18 for a total cost of $ 2.3 billion under the 2012 share repurchase plan . in august 2015 , the $ 5 billion of class a ordinary shares authorized under the 2012 share repurchase program was exhausted . at december 31 , 2015 , the remaining authorized amount for share repurchase under the 2014 share repurchase program is $ 4.1 billion . under the repurchase programs , the company repurchased a total of 78.1 million shares for an aggregate cost of $ 5.9 billion. .\nQuestion: what was the balance of uncertain tax positions in the end of 2015?\nAnswer: 218.0\nQuestion: and what was it in the beginning of the year?\nAnswer: 191.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change throughout the year?\nAnswer: 27.0\nQuestion: and in that same year, what was the number of shares repurchased?\nAnswer: 25.8\nQuestion: what was in 2014?\nAnswer: 16.0\nQuestion: how much, then, did the 2015 number represent in relation to this 2014 one?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.6125" } ]
CONVFINQA4412	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 31 of 98 additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 6 and 12 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases and purchase obligations in effect at december 31 , 2006 , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) less than1 year</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 2301.6</td><td>$ 38.5</td><td>$ 278.4</td><td>$ 972.9</td><td>$ 1011.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>7.6</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.4</td><td>0.4</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( b )</td><td>826.5</td><td>138.8</td><td>259.4</td><td>204.8</td><td>223.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating leases</td><td>185.9</td><td>45.0</td><td>58.5</td><td>38.7</td><td>43.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>7450.4</td><td>2682.5</td><td>3169.4</td><td>1524.6</td><td>73.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total payments on contractual obligations</td><td>$ 10772.0</td><td>$ 2907.5</td><td>$ 3768.1</td><td>$ 2741.4</td><td>$ 1355.0</td></tr></table> total payments on contractual obligations $ 10772.0 $ 2907.5 $ 3768.1 $ 2741.4 $ 1355.0 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates . ( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end . ( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials . also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items . in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used . depending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly . contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 69.1 million in 2007 . this estimate may change based on plan asset performance . benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 62.6 million , $ 65.1 million , $ 68.9 million , $ 73.9 million and $ 75.1 million for the years ending december 31 , 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and $ 436.7 million combined for 2012 through 2016 . payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be $ 24.6 million , $ 25.1 million , $ 25.5 million , $ 25.9 million and $ 26.1 million in the years 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and a total of $ 136.6 million thereafter . we reduced our share repurchase program in 2006 to $ 45.7 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 358.1 million net repurchases in 2005 and $ 50 million in 2004 . the net repurchases in 2006 did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares . the contract was settled on january 5 , 2007 , for $ 51.9 million in cash . in 2007 we expect to repurchase approximately $ 175 million , net of issuances , and to reduce debt levels by more than $ 125 million . annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2006 and 2005 and 35 cents per share in 2004 . total dividends paid were $ 41 million in 2006 , $ 42.5 million in 2005 and $ 38.9 million in 2004. .\nQuestion: what was the value of share repurchases in 2005?\nAnswer: 358.1\nQuestion: what was the value in 2004?\nAnswer: 45.7\nQuestion: what was the change in value?\nAnswer: 312.4\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.87238" } ]
CONVFINQA7321	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nadvance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 29 , 2007 , december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 11 . stock repurchase program : during fiscal 2007 , the company's board of directors authorized a new stock repurchase program of up to $ 500000 of the company's common stock plus related expenses . the new program cancelled and replaced the remaining portion of the previous $ 300000 stock repurchase program . the program allows the company to repurchase its common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time in accordance with the requirements of the securities and exchange commission . during fiscal 2007 , the company repurchased 8341 shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $ 285869 , or an average price of $ 34.27 per share , of which 1330 shares of common stock were repurchased under the previous $ 300000 stock repurchase program . as of december 29 , 2007 , 77 shares have been repurchased at an aggregate cost of $ 2959 and remained unsettled . during fiscal 2007 , the company retired 6329 shares previously repurchased under the stock repurchase programs . at december 29 , 2007 , the company had $ 260567 remaining under the current stock repurchase program . subsequent to december 29 , 2007 , the company repurchased 4563 shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $ 155350 , or an average price of $ 34.04 per share . during fiscal 2006 , the company retired 5117 shares of common stock which were previously repurchased under the company 2019s prior stock repurchase program . these shares were repurchased during fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 at an aggregate cost of $ 192339 , or an average price of $ 37.59 per share . 12 . income taxes : as a result of the adoption of fin 48 on december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded an increase of $ 2275 to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding decrease in its balance of retained earnings . the following table summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal year ended december 29 , 2007: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 16453</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross increases related to prior period tax positions</td><td>1279</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross decreases related to prior period tax positions</td><td>-1853 ( 1853 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross increases related to current period tax positions</td><td>5340</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements</td><td>-539 ( 539 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-271 ( 271 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 29 2007</td><td>$ 20409</td></tr></table> as of december 29 , 2007 the entire amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized , would reduce the company 2019s annual effective tax rate . with the adoption of fin 48 , the company provides for interest and penalties as a part of income tax expense . during fiscal 2007 , the company accrued potential penalties and interest of $ 709 and $ 1827 , respectively , related to these unrecognized tax benefits . as of december 29 , 2007 , the company has recorded a liability for potential penalties and interest of $ 1843 and $ 4421 , respectively . prior to the adoption of fin 48 , the company classified interest associated with tax contingencies in interest expense . the company has not provided for any penalties associated with tax contingencies unless considered probable of assessment . the company does not expect its unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months . during the next 12 months , it is possible the company could conclude on $ 2000 to $ 3000 of the contingencies associated with unrecognized tax uncertainties due mainly to settlements and expiration of statute of limitations ( including tax benefits , interest and penalties ) . the majority of these resolutions would be achieved through the completion of current income tax examinations. .\nQuestion: what is the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in 2007?\nAnswer: 20409.0\nQuestion: what about in 2006?\nAnswer: 16453.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 3956.0\nQuestion: what is the average stock price for repurchases shares in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "34.27" } ]
CONVFINQA872	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/25/2009</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>97.43</td><td>101.85</td><td>88.54</td><td>151.43</td><td>183.29</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>116.52</td><td>125.94</td><td>145.09</td><td>184.52</td><td>216.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>121.00</td><td>132.42</td><td>124.95</td><td>163.20</td><td>207.93</td></tr></table> dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .\nQuestion: what is the applied materials of 10/26/2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "183.29" } ]
CONVFINQA5548	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\neach clearing firm is required to deposit and maintain balances in the form of cash , u.s . government securities , certain foreign government securities , bank letters of credit or other approved investments to satisfy performance bond and guaranty fund requirements . all non-cash deposits are marked-to-market and haircut on a daily basis . securities deposited by the clearing firms are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and the clearing house does not earn any interest on these deposits . these balances may fluctuate significantly over time due to investment choices available to clearing firms and changes in the amount of contributions required . in addition , the rules and regulations of cbot require that collateral be provided for delivery of physical commodities , maintenance of capital requirements and deposits on pending arbitration matters . to satisfy these requirements , clearing firms that have accounts that trade certain cbot products have deposited cash , u.s . treasury securities or letters of credit . the clearing house marks-to-market open positions at least once a day ( twice a day for futures and options contracts ) , and require payment from clearing firms whose positions have lost value and make payments to clearing firms whose positions have gained value . the clearing house has the capability to mark-to-market more frequently as market conditions warrant . under the extremely unlikely scenario of simultaneous default by every clearing firm who has open positions with unrealized losses , the maximum exposure related to positions other than credit default and interest rate swap contracts would be one half day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering the clearing houses 2019 ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral deposits . for cleared credit default swap and interest rate swap contracts , the maximum exposure related to cme 2019s guarantee would be one full day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering cme 2019s ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral . during 2017 , the clearing house transferred an average of approximately $ 2.4 billion a day through the clearing system for settlement from clearing firms whose positions had lost value to clearing firms whose positions had gained value . the clearing house reduces the guarantee exposure through initial and maintenance performance bond requirements and mandatory guaranty fund contributions . the company believes that the guarantee liability is immaterial and therefore has not recorded any liability at december 31 , 2017 . at december 31 , 2016 , performance bond and guaranty fund contribution assets on the consolidated balance sheets included cash as well as u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities with maturity dates of 90 days or less . the u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities were purchased by cme , at its discretion , using cash collateral . the benefits , including interest earned , and risks of ownership accrue to cme . interest earned is included in investment income on the consolidated statements of income . there were no u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities held at december 31 , 2017 . the amortized cost and fair value of these securities at december 31 , 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) amortized . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2016 amortizedcost</td><td>2016 fairvalue</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . treasury securities</td><td>$ 5548.9</td><td>$ 5549.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . government agency securities</td><td>1228.3</td><td>1228.3</td></tr></table> cme has been designated as a systemically important financial market utility by the financial stability oversight council and maintains a cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . at december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , cme maintained $ 34.2 billion and $ 6.2 billion , respectively , within the cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . clearing firms , at their option , may instruct cme to deposit the cash held by cme into one of the ief programs . the total principal in the ief programs was $ 1.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and $ 6.8 billion at december 31 .\nQuestion: what was the total cash balance at the federal reserve bank of chicago for 12/31/17 and 12/31/16?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "40.4" } ]
CONVFINQA6707	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\non november 1 , 2016 , management evaluated the net assets of alcoa corporation for potential impairment and determined that no impairment charge was required . the cash flows related to alcoa corporation have not been segregated and are included in the statement of consolidated cash flows for 2016 . the following table presents depreciation , depletion and amortization , restructuring and other charges , and purchases of property , plant and equipment of the discontinued operations related to alcoa corporation: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the year ended december 31,</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>$ 593</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restructuring and other charges</td><td>$ 102</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital expenditures</td><td>$ 298</td></tr></table> w . subsequent events management evaluated all activity of arconic and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements , except as noted below : on january 22 , 2019 , the company announced that its board of directors ( the board ) had determined to no longer pursue a potential sale of arconic as part of its strategy and portfolio review . on february 6 , 2019 , the company announced that the board appointed john c . plant , current chairman of the board , as chairman and chief executive officer of the company , effective february 6 , 2019 , to succeed chip blankenship , who ceased to serve as chief executive officer of the company and resigned as a member of the board , in each case as of that date . in addition , the company announced that the board appointed elmer l . doty , current member of the board , as president and chief operating officer , a newly created position , effective february 6 , 2019 . mr . doty will remain a member of the board . the company also announced that arthur d . collins , jr. , current member of the board , has been appointed interim lead independent director of the company , effective february 6 , 2019 . on february 8 , 2019 , the company announced the following key initiatives as part of its ongoing strategy and portfolio review : plans to reduce operating costs , designed to maximize the impact in 2019 ; the planned separation of its portfolio into engineered products and forgings ( ep&f ) and global rolled products ( grp ) , with a spin-off of one of the businesses ; the potential sale of businesses that do not best fit into ep&f or grp ; execute its previously authorized $ 500 share repurchase program in the first half of 2019 ; the board authorized an additional $ 500 of share repurchases , effective through the end of 2020 ; and plans to reduce its quarterly common stock dividend from $ 0.06 to $ 0.02 per share . on february 19 , 2019 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase ( 201casr 201d ) agreement with jpmorgan chase bank to repurchase $ 700 of its common stock , pursuant to the share repurchase program previously authorized by the board . under the asr agreement , arconic will receive initial delivery of approximately 32 million shares on february 21 , 2019 . the final number of shares to be repurchased will be based on the volume-weighted average price of arconic 2019s common stock during the term of the transaction , less a discount . the asr agreement is expected to be completed during the first half of the company will evaluate its organizational structure in conjunction with the planned separation of its portfolio and changes to its reportable segments are expected in the first half of 2019. .\nQuestion: what was the value of depreciation, depletion and amortization?\nAnswer: 593.0\nQuestion: what was total capital expenditures?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "298.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10213	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 1 2014summary of significant accounting policies ( continued ) present value is accreted over the life of the related lease as an operating expense . all of the company 2019s existing asset retirement obligations are associated with commitments to return property subject to operating leases to original condition upon lease termination . the following table reconciles changes in the company 2019s asset retirement liabilities for fiscal 2006 and 2005 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004</td><td>$ 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additional asset retirement obligations recognized</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion recognized</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset retirement liability as of september 24 2005</td><td>$ 11.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additional asset retirement obligations recognized</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accretion recognized</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>asset retirement liability as of september 30 2006</td><td>$ 14.7</td></tr></table> long-lived assets including goodwill and other acquired intangible assets the company reviews property , plant , and equipment and certain identifiable intangibles , excluding goodwill , for impairment in accordance with sfas no . 144 , accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of . long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate . if property , plant , and equipment and certain identifiable intangibles are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair market value . for the three fiscal years ended september 30 , 2006 , the company had no material impairment of its long-lived assets , except for the impairment of certain assets in connection with the restructuring actions described in note 6 of these notes to consolidated financial statements . sfas no . 142 , goodwill and other intangible assets requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should not be amortized but rather be tested for impairment at least annually or sooner whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that they may be impaired . the company performs its goodwill impairment tests on or about august 30 of each year . the company did not recognize any goodwill or intangible asset impairment charges in 2006 , 2005 , or 2004 . the company established reporting units based on its current reporting structure . for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment , goodwill has been allocated to these reporting units to the extent it relates to each reporting sfas no . 142 also requires that intangible assets with definite lives be amortized over their estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with sfas no . 144 . the company is currently amortizing its acquired intangible assets with definite lives over periods ranging from 3 to 10 years . foreign currency translation the company translates the assets and liabilities of its international non-u.s . functional currency subsidiaries into u.s . dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of each period . revenue and expenses for these subsidiaries are translated using rates that approximate those in effect during the period . gains and losses from these translations are credited or charged to foreign currency translation .\nQuestion: what is the asset retirement liability as of september 24 2005?\nAnswer: 11.7\nQuestion: what about 2004?\nAnswer: 8.2\nQuestion: what is the net change from 2004 to 2005?\nAnswer: 3.5\nQuestion: what is the asset retirement liability as of september 24 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.2" } ]
CONVFINQA1494	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nof these options during fiscal 2010 , fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was $ 240.4 million , $ 15.1 million and $ 100.6 mil- lion , respectively . the total grant-date fair value of stock options that vested during fiscal 2010 , fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was approximately $ 67.2 million , $ 73.6 million and $ 77.6 million , respectively . proceeds from stock option exercises pursuant to employee stock plans in the company 2019s statement of cash flows of $ 216.1 million , $ 12.4 million and $ 94.2 million for fiscal 2010 , fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 , respectively , are net of the value of shares surrendered by employees in certain limited circumstances to satisfy the exercise price of options , and to satisfy employee tax obligations upon vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units and in connection with the exercise of stock options granted to the company 2019s employees under the company 2019s equity compensation plans . the withholding amount is based on the company 2019s minimum statutory withholding requirement . a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 30 , 2010 and changes during the year then ended is presented below : restricted outstanding weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding</td><td>weighted- average grant- date fair value per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2009</td><td>135</td><td>$ 22.19</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>1171</td><td>$ 28.86</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td><td>$ 24.70</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>units forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>$ 29.10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 30 2010</td><td>1265</td><td>$ 28.21</td></tr></table> as of october 30 , 2010 there was $ 95 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years . common stock repurchase program the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors has authorized the company to repurchase $ 4 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . under the program , the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 30 , 2010 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 116.0 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 3948.2 million under this program . an additional $ 51.8 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors including the amount of cash available to the company in the united states , and the company 2019s financial performance , outlook and liquidity . the company also from time to time repurchases shares in settlement of employee tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units , or in certain limited circumstances to satisfy the exercise price of options granted to the company 2019s employees under the company 2019s equity compensation plans . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: at october 30, 2010, what was the total value of the restricted stock units outstanding?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "35685.65" } ]
CONVFINQA797	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nn o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 : number of restricted stock weighted average grant- date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of restricted stock</td><td>weighted average grant- date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2005</td><td>3488668</td><td>$ 41.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1632504</td><td>$ 56.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1181249 ( 1181249 )</td><td>$ 40.20</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-360734 ( 360734 )</td><td>$ 44.04</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2006</td><td>3579189</td><td>$ 48.07</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1818716</td><td>$ 56.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1345412 ( 1345412 )</td><td>$ 44.48</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-230786 ( 230786 )</td><td>$ 51.57</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2007</td><td>3821707</td><td>$ 53.12</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>1836532</td><td>$ 59.84</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1403826 ( 1403826 )</td><td>$ 50.96</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-371183 ( 371183 )</td><td>$ 53.75</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2008</td><td>3883230</td><td>$ 57.01</td></tr></table> under the provisions of fas 123r , the recognition of deferred compensation , a contra-equity account representing the amount of unrecognized restricted stock expense that is reduced as expense is recognized , at the date restricted stock is granted is no longer permitted . therefore , upon adoption of fas 123r , the amount of deferred compensation that had been reflected in unearned stock grant compensation was reclassified to additional paid-in capital in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . restricted stock units the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of other awards , including restricted stock units . the company generally grants restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . each restricted stock unit repre- sents the company 2019s obligation to deliver to the holder one share of common shares upon vesting . during 2008 , the company awarded 223588 restricted stock units to officers of the company and its subsidiaries with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 59.93 . during 2007 , 108870 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.29 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . during 2006 , 83370 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.36 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . the company also grants restricted stock units with a 1-year vesting period to non-management directors . delivery of common shares on account of these restricted stock units to non-management directors is deferred until six months after the date of the non-management directors 2019 termination from the board . during 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , 40362 restricted stock units , 29676 restricted stock units , and 23092 restricted stock units , respectively , were awarded to non-management direc- the espp gives participating employees the right to purchase common shares through payroll deductions during consecutive 201csubscription periods . 201d annual purchases by participants are limited to the number of whole shares that can be purchased by an amount equal to ten percent of the participant 2019s compensation or $ 25000 , whichever is less . the espp has two six-month subscription periods , the first of which runs between january 1 and june 30 and the second of which runs between july 1 and december 31 of each year . the amounts that have been collected from participants during a subscription period are used on the 201cexercise date 201d to purchase full shares of common shares . an exercise date is generally the last trading day of a sub- scription period . the number of shares purchased is equal to the total amount , as of the exercise date , that has been collected from the participants through payroll deductions for that subscription period , divided by the 201cpurchase price 201d , rounded down to the next full share . effective for and from the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price is 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the exercise date . prior to the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price was calculated as the lower of ( i ) 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the first day of the subscription period , or .\nQuestion: what is the number of granted restricted stock in 2007?\nAnswer: 1818716.0\nQuestion: what is the number of vested and issued restricted stock in 2007?\nAnswer: -1345412.0\nQuestion: what is the total number of granted, vested and issued restricted stock in 2007?\nAnswer: 473304.0\nQuestion: what is the number of forfeited restricted stock in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-230786.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9736	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 2013 unallocated corporate ( expense ) income , net 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 214 million , $ 139 million after tax ( $ 0.31 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense of $ 62 million ( $ 0.14 per share ) resulting from a tax benefit related to claims we filed for additional extraterritorial income exclusion ( eti ) tax benefits . these items increased earnings by $ 201 million after tax ( $ 0.45 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 2013 unallocated corporate ( expense ) income , net 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 2013 unallocated corporate ( expense ) income , net 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . ( f ) we define return on invested capital ( roic ) as net earnings plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back adjustments related to postretirement benefit plans . we believe that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively we use the capital invested in our operations . we use roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also use it as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain of our incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . we calculate roic as follows : ( in millions ) 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 2529</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>235</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td><td>378</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 2764</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 878</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 4727</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 7491</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7686</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td><td>6853</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average benefit plan adjustments3 45</td><td>2006</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td><td>341</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 14419</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td><td>$ 14685</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>19.2% ( 19.2 % )</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>6.0% ( 6.0 % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability in all years and the adoption of fas 158 in 2006 . 4 average benefit plan adjustments reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the captions 201cadjustment for adoption of fas 158 201d and 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual benefit plan adjustments to equity were : 2006 = ( $ 1883 ) million ; 2005 = ( $ 105 ) million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 ) million ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; and 2002 = ( $ 1537 ) million . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the current year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter. .\nQuestion: what was the total of net earnings in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2529.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4171	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n82 \| 2017 form 10-k a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions , including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits , follows . reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:1 years a0ended a0december a031 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1,</td><td>$ 1032</td><td>$ 968</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions related to current year</td><td>270</td><td>73</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>20</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for settlements2</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>2014</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31,</td><td>$ 1286</td><td>$ 1032</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate</td><td>$ 1209</td><td>$ 963</td></tr></table> 1 foreign currency impacts are included within each line as applicable . 2 includes cash payment or other reduction of assets to settle liability . we classify interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes . we recognized a net provision for interest and penalties of $ 38 million , $ 34 million and $ 20 million during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the total amount of interest and penalties accrued was $ 157 million and $ 120 million as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . on january 31 , 2018 , we received a revenue agent 2019s report from the irs indicating the end of the field examination of our u.s . income tax returns for 2010 to 2012 . in the audits of 2007 to 2012 including the impact of a loss carryback to 2005 , the irs has proposed to tax in the united states profits earned from certain parts transactions by csarl , based on the irs examination team 2019s application of the 201csubstance-over-form 201d or 201cassignment-of-income 201d judicial doctrines . we are vigorously contesting the proposed increases to tax and penalties for these years of approximately $ 2.3 billion . we believe that the relevant transactions complied with applicable tax laws and did not violate judicial doctrines . we have filed u.s . income tax returns on this same basis for years after 2012 . based on the information currently available , we do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease to our unrecognized tax benefits for this matter within the next 12 months . we currently believe the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations . with the exception of a loss carryback to 2005 , tax years prior to 2007 are generally no longer subject to u.s . tax assessment . in our major non-u.s . jurisdictions including australia , brazil , china , germany , japan , mexico , switzerland , singapore and the u.k. , tax years are typically subject to examination for three to ten years . due to the uncertainty related to the timing and potential outcome of audits , we cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible change in unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. .\nQuestion: combined, what were the net provision for interest and penalties for 2017 and 2016?\nAnswer: 72.0\nQuestion: and also including 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "92.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5052	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nlevels during 2008 , an indication that efforts to improve network operations translated into better customer service . 2022 fuel prices 2013 crude oil prices increased at a steady rate through the first seven months of 2008 , closing at a record high of $ 145.29 a barrel in early july . as the economy worsened during the third and fourth quarters , fuel prices dropped dramatically , hitting $ 33.87 per barrel in december , a near five-year low . despite these price declines toward the end of the year , our 2008 average fuel price increased by 39% ( 39 % ) and added $ 1.1 billion of operating expenses compared to 2007 . our fuel surcharge programs helped offset the impact of higher fuel prices . in addition , we reduced our consumption rate by 4% ( 4 % ) , saving approximately 58 million gallons of fuel during the year . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; our fuel conservation programs ; improved network operations ; and a shift in commodity mix , primarily due to growth in bulk shipments , contributed to the improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled a record $ 4.1 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 825 million in 2008 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 4070</td><td>$ 3277</td><td>$ 2880</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2764 ( 2764 )</td><td>-2426 ( 2426 )</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-481 ( 481 )</td><td>-364 ( 364 )</td><td>-322 ( 322 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 825</td><td>$ 487</td><td>$ 516</td></tr></table> 2009 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training and engaging our employees . we plan to continue implementation of total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc , an employee-focused initiative that has helped improve safety , is a process designed to establish , maintain , and promote safety among co-workers . with respect to public safety , we will continue our efforts to maintain , upgrade , and close crossings , install video cameras on locomotives , and educate the public about crossing safety through various railroad and industry programs , along with other activities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 in 2009 , we will continue to evaluate traffic flows and network logistic patterns to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to maintain adequate manpower and locomotives , and improve productivity using industrial engineering techniques . 2022 fuel prices 2013 on average , we expect fuel prices to decrease substantially from the average price we paid in 2008 . however , due to economic uncertainty , other global pressures , and weather incidents , fuel prices again could be volatile during the year . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we .\nQuestion: what was free cash flow in 2008?\nAnswer: 825.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "487.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1418	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother taxes decreased in 2001 because its utility operations in virginia became subject to state income taxes in lieu of gross receipts taxes effective january 2001 . in addition , dominion recognized higher effective rates for foreign earnings and higher pretax income in relation to non-conventional fuel tax credits realized . dominion energy 2002 2001 2000 ( millions , except per share amounts ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions except pershare amounts )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenue</td><td>$ 5940</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 4894</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>4520</td><td>4749</td><td>3939</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income contribution</td><td>770</td><td>723</td><td>489</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>earnings per share contribution</td><td>$ 2.72</td><td>$ 2.86</td><td>$ 2.07</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity supplied* ( million mwhrs )</td><td>101</td><td>95</td><td>83</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gas transmission throughput ( bcf )</td><td>597</td><td>553</td><td>567</td></tr></table> * amounts presented are for electricity supplied by utility and merchant generation operations . operating results 2014 2002 dominion energy contributed $ 2.72 per diluted share on net income of $ 770 million for 2002 , a net income increase of $ 47 million and an earnings per share decrease of $ 0.14 over 2001 . net income for 2002 reflected lower operating revenue ( $ 204 million ) , operating expenses ( $ 229 million ) and other income ( $ 27 million ) . interest expense and income taxes , which are discussed on a consolidated basis , decreased $ 50 million over 2001 . the earnings per share decrease reflected share dilution . regulated electric sales revenue increased $ 179 million . favorable weather conditions , reflecting increased cooling and heating degree-days , as well as customer growth , are estimated to have contributed $ 133 million and $ 41 million , respectively . fuel rate recoveries increased approximately $ 65 million for 2002 . these recoveries are generally offset by increases in elec- tric fuel expense and do not materially affect income . partially offsetting these increases was a net decrease of $ 60 million due to other factors not separately measurable , such as the impact of economic conditions on customer usage , as well as variations in seasonal rate premiums and discounts . nonregulated electric sales revenue increased $ 9 million . sales revenue from dominion 2019s merchant generation fleet decreased $ 21 million , reflecting a $ 201 million decline due to lower prices partially offset by sales from assets acquired and constructed in 2002 and the inclusion of millstone operations for all of 2002 . revenue from the wholesale marketing of utility generation decreased $ 74 million . due to the higher demand of utility service territory customers during 2002 , less production from utility plant generation was available for profitable sale in the wholesale market . revenue from retail energy sales increased $ 71 million , reflecting primarily customer growth over the prior year . net revenue from dominion 2019s electric trading activities increased $ 33 million , reflecting the effect of favorable price changes on unsettled contracts and higher trading margins . nonregulated gas sales revenue decreased $ 351 million . the decrease included a $ 239 million decrease in sales by dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing opera- tions , reflecting to a large extent declining prices . revenue associated with gas trading operations , net of related cost of sales , decreased $ 112 million . the decrease included $ 70 mil- lion of realized and unrealized losses on the economic hedges of natural gas production by the dominion exploration & pro- duction segment . as described below under selected information 2014 energy trading activities , sales of natural gas by the dominion exploration & production segment at market prices offset these financial losses , resulting in a range of prices contemplated by dominion 2019s overall risk management strategy . the remaining $ 42 million decrease was due to unfavorable price changes on unsettled contracts and lower overall trading margins . those losses were partially offset by contributions from higher trading volumes in gas and oil markets . gas transportation and storage revenue decreased $ 44 million , primarily reflecting lower rates . electric fuel and energy purchases expense increased $ 94 million which included an increase of $ 66 million associated with dominion 2019s energy marketing operations that are not sub- ject to cost-based rate regulation and an increase of $ 28 million associated with utility operations . substantially all of the increase associated with non-regulated energy marketing opera- tions related to higher volumes purchased during the year . for utility operations , energy costs increased $ 66 million for pur- chases subject to rate recovery , partially offset by a $ 38 million decrease in fuel expenses associated with lower wholesale mar- keting of utility plant generation . purchased gas expense decreased $ 245 million associated with dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing oper- ations . this decrease reflected approximately $ 162 million asso- ciated with declining prices and $ 83 million associated with lower purchased volumes . liquids , pipeline capacity and other purchases decreased $ 64 million , primarily reflecting comparably lower levels of rate recoveries of certain costs of transmission operations in the cur- rent year period . the difference between actual expenses and amounts recovered in the period are deferred pending future rate adjustments . other operations and maintenance expense decreased $ 14 million , primarily reflecting an $ 18 million decrease in outage costs due to fewer generation unit outages in the current year . depreciation expense decreased $ 11 million , reflecting decreases in depreciation associated with changes in the esti- mated useful lives of certain electric generation property , par- tially offset by increased depreciation associated with state line and millstone operations . other income decreased $ 27 million , including a $ 14 mil- lion decrease in net realized investment gains in the millstone 37d o m i n i o n 2019 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t .\nQuestion: what was the electricity supplied (in million mwhrs) in the year of 2002?\nAnswer: 101.0\nQuestion: and what was that of 2001?\nAnswer: 95.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change rate in the electricity supplied from 2001 to 2002?\nAnswer: 1.06316\nQuestion: what was the electricity supplied (in million mwhrs) in the year of 2002?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "101.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4337	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( \"ifs\" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .\nQuestion: what is the total consolidated revenues in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9123.0" } ]
CONVFINQA786	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndecreased production volume as final aircraft deliveries were completed during the second quarter of 2012 and $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter during the second quarter of 2012 ; and about $ 270 million for various other programs ( primarily sustainment activities ) due to decreased volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 295 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; approximately $ 245 million for the c-5 program due to increased aircraft deliveries ( six aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to four in 2012 ) and other modernization activities ; and about $ 70 million for the f-35 development contract due to increased volume . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2013 decreased $ 87 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 85 million for the f-22 program , which includes approximately $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 and about $ 35 million due to decreased risk retirements and production volume ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program due to lower risk retirements and fewer deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activities ; about $ 65 million for the c-5 program due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the third quarter of 2013 and lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 35 million for the f-16 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activity and aircraft configuration mix . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 180 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for the f-35 development contract and included adjustments of approximately $ 85 million to reflect the inception-to-date impacts of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate in both 2013 and 2012 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 75 million lower for 2013 compared to backlog backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2015 net sales to be comparable or slightly behind 2014 due to a decline in f-16 deliveries as well as a decline in f-35 development activity , partially offset by an increase in production contracts . operating profit is also expected to decrease in the low single digit range , due primarily to contract mix , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7788</td><td>$ 8367</td><td>$ 8846</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>699</td><td>759</td><td>808</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 8700</td><td>$ 8300</td><td>$ 8700</td></tr></table> 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 579 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , for 2014 compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 645 million for 2014 due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo and ptds ) and defense budgets tied to command and control programs ; and approximately $ 490 million for 2014 due to a decline in volume for various ongoing programs , which reflects lower funding levels and programs impacted by in-theater force reductions . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 550 million for 2014 due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies. .\nQuestion: what was the operating profit in 2013?\nAnswer: 759.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2012?\nAnswer: 808.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-49.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4240	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) merchant acquiring business in the united kingdom to the partnership . in addition , hsbc uk entered into a ten-year marketing alliance with the partnership in which hsbc uk will refer customers to the partnership for payment processing services in the united kingdom . on june 23 , 2008 , we entered into a new five year , $ 200 million term loan to fund a portion of the acquisition . we funded the remaining purchase price with excess cash and our existing credit facilities . the term loan bears interest , at our election , at the prime rate or london interbank offered rate plus a margin based on our leverage position . as of july 1 , 2008 , the interest rate on the term loan was 3.605% ( 3.605 % ) . the term loan calls for quarterly principal payments of $ 5 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2008 and increasing to $ 10 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2010 and $ 15 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2011 . the partnership agreement includes provisions pursuant to which hsbc uk may compel us to purchase , at fair value , additional membership units from hsbc uk ( the 201cput option 201d ) . hsbc uk may exercise the put option on the fifth anniversary of the closing of the acquisition and on each anniversary thereafter . by exercising the put option , hsbc uk can require us to purchase , on an annual basis , up to 15% ( 15 % ) of the total membership units . additionally , on the tenth anniversary of closing and each tenth anniversary thereafter , hsbc uk may compel us to purchase all of their membership units at fair value . while not redeemable until june 2013 , we estimate the maximum total redemption amount of the minority interest under the put option would be $ 421.4 million , as of may 31 , 2008 . the purpose of this acquisition was to establish a presence in the united kingdom . the key factors that contributed to the decision to make this acquisition include historical and prospective financial statement analysis and hsbc uk 2019s market share and retail presence in the united kingdom . the purchase price was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements and applying relevant purchase price multiples . the purchase price totaled $ 441.1 million , consisting of $ 438.6 million cash consideration plus $ 2.5 million of direct out of pocket costs . the acquisition has been recorded using the purchase method of accounting , and , accordingly , the purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 294741</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>116920</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>13437</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>trademark</td><td>2204</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>26955</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other current assets</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>454357</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>minority interest in equity of subsidiary ( at historical cost )</td><td>-13257 ( 13257 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 441100</td></tr></table> due to the recent timing of the transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary . all of the goodwill associated with the acquisition is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 13 years . the contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 7 years . the trademark has an amortization period of 5 years. .\nQuestion: what was the value of the loan?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "200.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7652	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company further presents total net 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure , net of deferred compensation investments and hedged investments , to reflect another gauge for investors as the economic impact of investments held pursuant to deferred compensation arrangements is substantially offset by a change in compensation expense and the impact of hedged investments is substantially mitigated by total return swap hedges . carried interest capital allocations are excluded as there is no impact to blackrock 2019s stockholders 2019 equity until such amounts are realized as performance fees . finally , the company 2019s regulatory investment in federal reserve bank stock , which is not subject to market or interest rate risk , is excluded from the company 2019s net economic investment exposure . ( dollar amounts in millions ) december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>december 31 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total investments gaap</td><td>$ 1750</td><td>$ 1631</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investments held by consolidated sponsored investmentfunds ( 1 )</td><td>-524 ( 524 )</td><td>-587 ( 587 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net exposure to consolidated investment funds</td><td>430</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total investments as adjusted</td><td>1656</td><td>1519</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>federal reserve bank stock ( 2 )</td><td>-89 ( 89 )</td><td>-328 ( 328 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>carried interest</td><td>-85 ( 85 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred compensation investments</td><td>-62 ( 62 )</td><td>-65 ( 65 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>hedged investments</td><td>-209 ( 209 )</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure</td><td>$ 1211</td><td>$ 1062</td></tr></table> total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure . . . $ 1211 $ 1062 ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , approximately $ 524 million and $ 587 million , respectively , of blackrock 2019s total gaap investments were maintained in sponsored investment funds that were deemed to be controlled by blackrock in accordance with gaap , and , therefore , are consolidated even though blackrock may not economically own a majority of such funds . ( 2 ) the decrease of $ 239 million related to a lower holding requirement of federal reserve bank stock held by blackrock institutional trust company , n.a . ( 201cbtc 201d ) . total investments , as adjusted , at december 31 , 2012 increased $ 137 million from december 31 , 2011 , resulting from $ 765 million of purchases/capital contributions , $ 185 million from positive market valuations and earnings from equity method investments , and $ 64 million from net additional carried interest capital allocations , partially offset by $ 742 million of sales/maturities and $ 135 million of distributions representing return of capital and return on investments. .\nQuestion: what was the sum of total 2010 economic investment exposure and the positive value of investments held by consolidated sponsored investment funds?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1735.0" } ]
CONVFINQA470	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfacility continue to have a maturity date of october 2016 . in addition , the maturity date of the company's revolving credit facility was extended to october 2018 and the facility was increased to $ 900 million from $ 600 million . accordingly , the amended credit agreement consists of the term c-2 loan facility , the term c-3 loan facility and a $ 900 million revolving credit facility . net deferred financing costs are as follows : net deferred financing costs ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>net deferred financing costs ( in $ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>as of december 31 2011</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>financing costs deferred ( 1 )</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accelerated amortization due to refinancing activity ( 2 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>as of december 31 2012</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>financing costs deferred ( 3 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accelerated amortization due to refinancing activity</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amortization</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>as of december 31 2013</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>financing costs deferred ( 4 )</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>accelerated amortization due to refinancing activity ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>amortization</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>as of december 31 2014</td><td>27</td></tr></table> ____________________________ ( 1 ) relates to the issuance of the 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes . ( 2 ) relates to the $ 400 million prepayment of the term c loan facility with proceeds from the 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes . ( 3 ) relates to the september 2013 amendment to the celanese us existing senior secured credit facilities to reduce the interest rates payable in connection with certain borrowings thereby creating the term c-2 loan facility due 2016 . ( 4 ) includes $ 6 million related to the issuance of the 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) notes and $ 4 million related to the september 24 , 2014 amendment to the celanese us existing senior secured credit facilities . ( 5 ) includes $ 4 million related to the 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) notes redemption and $ 1 million related to the term c-2 loan facility conversion . as of december 31 , 2014 , the margin for borrowings under the term c-2 loan facility was 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) above the euro interbank offered rate ( \"euribor\" ) and the margin for borrowings under the term c-3 loan facility was 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) above libor ( for us dollars ) and 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) above euribor ( for euros ) , as applicable . as of december 31 , 2014 , the margin for borrowings under the revolving credit facility was 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) above libor . the margin for borrowings under the revolving credit facility is subject to increase or decrease in certain circumstances based on changes in the corporate credit ratings of celanese or celanese us . term loan borrowings under the amended credit agreement are subject to amortization at 1% ( 1 % ) of the initial principal amount per annum , payable quarterly . in addition , the company pays quarterly commitment fees on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) per annum . the amended credit agreement is guaranteed by celanese and certain domestic subsidiaries of celanese us and is secured by a lien on substantially all assets of celanese us and such guarantors , subject to certain agreed exceptions ( including for certain real property and certain shares of foreign subsidiaries ) , pursuant to the guarantee and collateral agreement , dated april 2 , as a condition to borrowing funds or requesting letters of credit be issued under the revolving credit facility , the company's first lien senior secured leverage ratio ( as calculated as of the last day of the most recent fiscal quarter for which financial statements have been delivered under the revolving facility ) cannot exceed the threshold as specified below . further , the company's first lien senior secured leverage ratio must be maintained at or below that threshold while any amounts are outstanding under the revolving credit facility. .\nQuestion: what was the quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.25" } ]
CONVFINQA1486	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nadditions to property , plant and equipment are our most significant use of cash and cash equivalents . the following table shows capital expenditures related to continuing operations by segment and reconciles to additions to property , plant and equipment as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows for 2014 , 2013 and 2012: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>north america e&p</td><td>$ 4698</td><td>$ 3649</td><td>$ 3988</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international e&p</td><td>534</td><td>456</td><td>235</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>oil sands mining</td><td>212</td><td>286</td><td>188</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>corporate</td><td>51</td><td>58</td><td>115</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total capital expenditures</td><td>5495</td><td>4449</td><td>4526</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>change in capital expenditure accrual</td><td>-335 ( 335 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-165 ( 165 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions to property plant and equipment</td><td>$ 5160</td><td>$ 4443</td><td>$ 4361</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2014 , we had repurchased a total of 121 million common shares at a cost of $ 4.7 billion , including 29 million shares at a cost of $ 1 billion in the first six months of 2014 and 14 million shares at a cost of $ 500 million in the third quarter of 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for discussion of purchases of common stock . liquidity and capital resources our main sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents , internally generated cash flow from operations , continued access to capital markets , our committed revolving credit facility and sales of non-strategic assets . our working capital requirements are supported by these sources and we may issue commercial paper backed by our $ 2.5 billion revolving credit facility to meet short-term cash requirements . because of the alternatives available to us as discussed above and access to capital markets through the shelf registration discussed below , we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund not only our current operations , but also our near-term and long-term funding requirements including our capital spending programs , dividend payments , defined benefit plan contributions , repayment of debt maturities and other amounts that may ultimately be paid in connection with contingencies . at december 31 , 2014 , we had approximately $ 4.9 billion of liquidity consisting of $ 2.4 billion in cash and cash equivalents and $ 2.5 billion availability under our revolving credit facility . as discussed in more detail below in 201coutlook 201d , we are targeting a $ 3.5 billion budget for 2015 . based on our projected 2015 cash outlays for our capital program and dividends , we expect to outspend our cash flows from operations for the year . we will be constantly monitoring our available liquidity during 2015 and we have the flexibility to adjust our budget throughout the year in response to the commodity price environment . we will also continue to drive the fundamentals of expense management , including organizational capacity and operational reliability . capital resources credit arrangements and borrowings in may 2014 , we amended our $ 2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility and extended the maturity to may 2019 . see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for additional terms and rates . at december 31 , 2014 , we had no borrowings against our revolving credit facility and no amounts outstanding under our u.s . commercial paper program that is backed by the revolving credit facility . at december 31 , 2014 , we had $ 6391 million in long-term debt outstanding , and $ 1068 million is due within one year , of which the majority is due in the fourth quarter of 2015 . we do not have any triggers on any of our corporate debt that would cause an event of default in the case of a downgrade of our credit ratings . shelf registration we have a universal shelf registration statement filed with the sec , under which we , as \"well-known seasoned issuer\" for purposes of sec rules , have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities from time to time. .\nQuestion: what was the liquidity amount as of december 31, 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.9" } ]
CONVFINQA6361	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnew term loan a facility , with the remaining unpaid principal amount of loans under the new term loan a facility due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 . principal amounts outstanding under the new revolving loan facility are due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 , subject to earlier repayment pursuant to the springing maturity date described above . in addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the borrowings , we are obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee at a rate determined by reference to a total leverage ratio , with a maximum commitment fee of 40% ( 40 % ) of the applicable margin for eurocurrency loans . in july 2016 , breakaway four , ltd. , as borrower , and nclc , as guarantor , entered into a supplemental agreement , which amended the breakaway four loan to , among other things , increase the aggregate principal amount of commitments under the multi-draw term loan credit facility from 20ac590.5 million to 20ac729.9 million . in june 2016 , we took delivery of seven seas explorer . to finance the payment due upon delivery , we had export credit financing in place for 80% ( 80 % ) of the contract price . the associated $ 373.6 million term loan bears interest at 3.43% ( 3.43 % ) with a maturity date of june 30 , 2028 . principal and interest payments shall be paid semiannually . in december 2016 , nclc issued $ 700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior unsecured notes due december 2021 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) in a private offering ( the 201coffering 201d ) at par . nclc used the net proceeds from the offering , after deducting the initial purchasers 2019 discount and estimated fees and expenses , together with cash on hand , to purchase its outstanding 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 having an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $ 680 million . the redemption of the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 was completed in january 2017 . nclc will pay interest on the notes at 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) per annum , semiannually on june 15 and december 15 of each year , commencing on june 15 , 2017 , to holders of record at the close of business on the immediately preceding june 1 and december 1 , respectively . nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or part , at any time prior to december 15 , 2018 , at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but not including , the redemption date and a 201cmake-whole premium . 201d nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or in part , on or after december 15 , 2018 , at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the notes . at any time ( which may be more than once ) on or prior to december 15 , 2018 , nclc may choose to redeem up to 40% ( 40 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes at a redemption price equal to 104.750% ( 104.750 % ) of the face amount thereof with an amount equal to the net proceeds of one or more equity offerings , so long as at least 60% ( 60 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes issued remains outstanding following such redemption . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants that limit nclc 2019s ability ( and its restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability ) to , among other things : ( i ) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares ; ( ii ) pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments ; ( iii ) create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other distributions to nclc from its restricted subsidiaries ; ( iv ) create liens on certain assets to secure debt ; ( v ) make certain investments ; ( vi ) engage in transactions with affiliates ; ( vii ) engage in sales of assets and subsidiary stock ; and ( viii ) transfer all or substantially all of its assets or enter into merger or consolidation transactions . the indenture governing the notes also provides for events of default , which , if any of them occurs , would permit or require the principal , premium ( if any ) , interest and other monetary obligations on all of the then-outstanding notes to become due and payable immediately . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2016 was $ 276.9 million which included $ 34.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 27.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 221.9 million which included $ 36.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 12.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 151.8 million which included $ 32.3 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and $ 15.4 million of expenses related to financing transactions in connection with the acquisition of prestige . certain of our debt agreements contain covenants that , among other things , require us to maintain a minimum level of liquidity , as well as limit our net funded debt-to-capital ratio , maintain certain other ratios and restrict our ability to pay dividends . substantially all of our ships and other property and equipment are pledged as collateral for certain of our debt . we believe we were in compliance with these covenants as of december 31 , 2016 . the following are scheduled principal repayments on long-term debt including capital lease obligations as of december 31 , 2016 for each of the next five years ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 560193</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>554846</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>561687</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>1153733</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>2193823</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1490322</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 6514604</td></tr></table> we had an accrued interest liability of $ 32.5 million and $ 34.2 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the value that can be deducted from future income tax due to amortization in 2016?\nAnswer: 34.7\nQuestion: what was the value in 2015?\nAnswer: 36.7\nQuestion: what is the sum of those years?\nAnswer: 71.4\nQuestion: what was the 2014 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "32.3" } ]
CONVFINQA4154	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries method or straight-line method , as applicable . the company classifies deferred financing costs as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the long-term debt liability on the consolidated balance sheets , except for deferred financing costs associated with revolving credit facilities which are presented as an asset , within other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . derivative instruments the company has interest rate cap agreements for the purpose of hedging its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates . the interest rate cap agreements are designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk and recorded at fair value in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . the gain or loss on the derivative instruments is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss until reclassified to interest expense in the same period the hedge transaction affects earnings . fair value measurements fair value is defined under gaap as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date . a fair value hierarchy has been established for valuation inputs to prioritize the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market . each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which is determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety . these levels are : level 1 2013 observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets . level 2 2013 inputs are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets , quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities . level 3 2013 inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management 2019s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability . the fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models , discounted cash flow models and similar techniques . accumulated other comprehensive loss the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in stockholders 2019 equity are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>$ -96.1 ( 96.1 )</td><td>$ -139.6 ( 139.6 )</td><td>$ -61.1 ( 61.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>unrealized gain from hedge accounting</td><td>0.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive loss</td><td>$ -95.9 ( 95.9 )</td><td>$ -139.6 ( 139.6 )</td><td>$ -61.1 ( 61.1 )</td></tr></table> revenue recognition the company is a primary distribution channel for a large group of vendors and suppliers , including original equipment manufacturers ( 201coems 201d ) , software publishers , wholesale distributors and cloud providers . the company records revenue from sales transactions when title and risk of loss are passed to the customer , there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement for sale , delivery has occurred and/or services have been rendered , the sales price is fixed or determinable , and collectability is reasonably assured . the company 2019s shipping terms typically specify f.o.b . destination , at which time title and risk of loss have passed to the customer . revenues from the sales of hardware products and software licenses are generally recognized on a gross basis with the selling price to the customer recorded as sales and the acquisition cost of the product recorded as cost of sales . these items can be delivered to customers in a variety of ways , including ( i ) as physical product shipped from the company 2019s warehouse , ( ii ) via drop-shipment by the vendor or supplier , or ( iii ) via electronic delivery for software licenses . at the time of sale , the company records an estimate for sales returns and allowances based on historical experience . the company 2019s vendor partners warrant most of the products the company sells . the company leverages drop-shipment arrangements with many of its vendors and suppliers to deliver products to its customers without having to physically hold the inventory at its warehouses , thereby increasing efficiency and reducing .\nQuestion: what was the loss from foreign currency translation in 2017?\nAnswer: 96.1\nQuestion: what was it in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "139.6" } ]
CONVFINQA7892	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nroyal caribbean cruises ltd . notes to the consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 9 . stock-based employee compensation we have four stock-based compensation plans , which provide for awards to our officers , directors and key employees . the plans consist of a 1990 employee stock option plan , a 1995 incentive stock option plan , a 2000 stock award plan , and a 2008 equity plan . the 1990 stock option plan and the 1995 incentive stock option plan terminated by their terms in march 2000 and february 2005 , respectively . the 2000 stock award plan , as amended , and the 2008 equity plan provide for the issuance of ( i ) incentive and non-qualified stock options , ( ii ) stock appreciation rights , ( iii ) restricted stock , ( iv ) restricted stock units and ( v ) up to 13000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2000 stock award plan and up to 5000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2008 equity plan . during any calendar year , no one individual shall be granted awards of more than 500000 shares . options and restricted stock units outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 vest in equal installments over four to five years from the date of grant . generally , options and restricted stock units are forfeited if the recipient ceases to be a director or employee before the shares vest . options are granted at a price not less than the fair value of the shares on the date of grant and expire not later than ten years after the date of grant . we also provide an employee stock purchase plan to facilitate the purchase by employees of up to 800000 shares of common stock in the aggregate . offerings to employees are made on a quarterly basis . subject to certain limitations , the purchase price for each share of common stock is equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the average of the market prices of the common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange on the first business day of the purchase period and the last business day of each month of the purchase period . shares of common stock of 65005 , 36836 and 20759 were issued under the espp at a weighted-average price of $ 12.78 , $ 20.97 and $ 37.25 during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . under the chief executive officer 2019s employment agreement we contributed 10086 shares of our common stock quarterly , to a maximum of 806880 shares , to a trust on his behalf . in january 2009 , the employment agreement and related trust agreement were amended . consequently , 768018 shares were distributed from the trust and future quarterly share distributions are issued directly to the chief executive officer . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 was $ 16.8 million . of this amount , $ 16.2 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 0.6 million was included within payroll and related expenses . total compensation expense recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2008 was $ 5.7 million . of this amount , $ 6.4 million , which included a benefit of approximately $ 8.2 million due to a change in the employee forfeiture rate assumption was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and income of $ 0.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses which also included a benefit of approximately $ 1.0 million due to the change in the forfeiture rate . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2007 was $ 19.0 million . of this amount , $ 16.3 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 2.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses . the fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the estimated fair value of stock options , less estimated forfeitures , is amortized over the vesting period using the graded-vesting method . the assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model are as follows : expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and implied volatilities . the risk-free interest rate is based on united states treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected option life assumed at the date of grant . the expected term was calculated based on historical experience and represents the time period options actually remain outstanding . we estimate forfeitures based on historical pre-vesting forfeiture rates and revise those estimates as appropriate to reflect actual experience . in 2008 , we increased our estimated forfeiture rate from 4% ( 4 % ) for options and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) for restricted stock units to 20% ( 20 % ) to reflect changes in employee retention rates. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected stock price volatility</td><td>55.0% ( 55.0 % )</td><td>31.4% ( 31.4 % )</td><td>28.0% ( 28.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.8% ( 1.8 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td><td>4.8% ( 4.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option life</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the common stock issued during 2009?\nAnswer: 65005.0\nQuestion: and the amount issued in 2008?\nAnswer: 36836.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference between these two years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "28169.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9219	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . we made no further grants under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . we will make no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option plan . the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 14.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015 ( in thousands )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 30809</td><td>$ 21056</td><td>$ 29793</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ 9879</td><td>$ 6907</td><td>$ 7126</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 and thereafter either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . the performance units granted to certain executives in fiscal 2014 were based on a one-year performance period . after the compensation committee certified the performance results , 25% ( 25 % ) of the performance units converted to unrestricted shares . the remaining 75% ( 75 % ) converted to restricted shares that vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the conversion date . the performance units granted to certain executives during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 were based on a three-year performance period . after the compensation committee certifies the performance results for the three-year period , performance units earned will convert into unrestricted common stock . the compensation committee may set a range of possible performance-based outcomes for performance units . depending on the achievement of the performance measures , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . for awards with only performance conditions , we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the performance period using the grant date fair value of the award , which is based on the number of shares expected to be earned according to the level of achievement of performance goals . if the number of shares expected to be earned were to change at any time during the performance period , we would make a cumulative adjustment to share-based compensation expense based on the revised number of shares expected to be earned . global payments inc . \| 2016 form 10-k annual report 2013 83 .\nQuestion: what was the difference in income tax benefit between 2014 and 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2753.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6711	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 7 . financing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american tower credit facility</td><td>$ 1000000</td><td>$ 793000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>spectrasite credit facility</td><td>725000</td><td>700000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior subordinated notes</td><td>325075</td><td>400000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation</td><td>-</td><td>160252</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior notes net of discount and premium</td><td>728507</td><td>726754</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>convertible notes net of discount</td><td>704596</td><td>773058</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and capital leases</td><td>59838</td><td>60365</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>3543016</td><td>3613429</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less current portion of other long-term obligations</td><td>-253907 ( 253907 )</td><td>-162153 ( 162153 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>long-term obligations</td><td>$ 3289109</td><td>$ 3451276</td></tr></table> credit facilities 2014in october 2005 , the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries . the company replaced the existing american tower $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $ 900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.15 billion senior secured credit facility . in february 2007 , the company secured an additional $ 550.0 million under its credit facilities and drew down $ 250.0 million of the existing revolving loans under the american tower credit facility . ( see note 19. ) during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company drew down the remaining amount available under the delayed draw term loan component of the american tower credit facility and drew down $ 25.0 million of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite credit facility to finance debt redemptions and repurchases . in addition , on october 27 , 2006 , the remaining $ 175.0 million undrawn portion of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite facility was canceled pursuant to its terms . as of december 31 , 2006 , the american tower credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 300.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 17.8 million of undrawn letters of credit are outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; 2022 a $ 750.0 million term loan a , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; and 2022 a $ 250.0 million delayed draw term loan , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 . the borrowers under the american tower credit facility include ati , american tower , l.p. , american tower international , inc . and american tower llc . the company and the borrowers 2019 restricted subsidiaries ( as defined in the loan agreement ) have guaranteed all of the loans under the credit facility . these loans are secured by liens on and security interests in substantially all assets of the borrowers and the restricted subsidiaries , with a carrying value aggregating approximately $ 4.5 billion at december 31 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the spectrasite credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 250.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 4.6 million of undrawn letters of credit were outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010; .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2005, what was the amount from the total of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements that was current?\nAnswer: 162153.0\nQuestion: and what was that total of outstanding amounts?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3613429.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4584	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents research and development expense ( 201cr&d 201d ) r&d expense increased 34% ( 34 % ) or $ 449 million to $ 1.8 billion in 2010 compared to 2009 . this increase was due primarily to an increase in headcount and related expenses in the current year to support expanded r&d activities . also contributing to this increase in r&d expense in 2010 was the capitalization in 2009 of software development costs of $ 71 million related to mac os x snow leopard . although total r&d expense increased 34% ( 34 % ) during 2010 , it declined as a percentage of net sales given the 52% ( 52 % ) year-over-year increase in net sales in 2010 . the company continues to believe that focused investments in r&d are critical to its future growth and competitive position in the marketplace and are directly related to timely development of new and enhanced products that are central to the company 2019s core business strategy . as such , the company expects to make further investments in r&d to remain competitive . r&d expense increased 20% ( 20 % ) or $ 224 million to $ 1.3 billion in 2009 compared to 2008 . this increase was due primarily to an increase in headcount in 2009 to support expanded r&d activities and higher stock-based compensation expenses . additionally , $ 71 million of software development costs were capitalized related to mac os x snow leopard and excluded from r&d expense during 2009 , compared to $ 11 million of software development costs capitalized during 2008 . although total r&d expense increased 20% ( 20 % ) during 2009 , it remained relatively flat as a percentage of net sales given the 14% ( 14 % ) increase in revenue in 2009 . selling , general and administrative expense ( 201csg&a 201d ) sg&a expense increased $ 1.4 billion or 33% ( 33 % ) to $ 5.5 billion in 2010 compared to 2009 . this increase was due primarily to the company 2019s continued expansion of its retail segment , higher spending on marketing and advertising programs , increased stock-based compensation expenses and variable costs associated with the overall growth of the company 2019s net sales . sg&a expenses increased $ 388 million or 10% ( 10 % ) to $ 4.1 billion in 2009 compared to 2008 . this increase was due primarily to the company 2019s continued expansion of its retail segment in both domestic and international markets , higher stock-based compensation expense and higher spending on marketing and advertising . other income and expense other income and expense for the three years ended september 25 , 2010 , are as follows ( in millions ) : total other income and expense decreased $ 171 million or 52% ( 52 % ) to $ 155 million during 2010 compared to $ 326 million and $ 620 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the overall decrease in other income and expense is attributable to the significant declines in interest rates on a year- over-year basis , partially offset by the company 2019s higher cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities balances . the weighted average interest rate earned by the company on its cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities was 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) , 1.43% ( 1.43 % ) and 3.44% ( 3.44 % ) during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . additionally the company incurred higher premium expenses on its foreign exchange option contracts , which further reduced the total other income and expense . during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company had no debt outstanding and accordingly did not incur any related interest expense . provision for income taxes the company 2019s effective tax rates were 24% ( 24 % ) , 32% ( 32 % ) and 32% ( 32 % ) for 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the company 2019s effective rates for these periods differ from the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% ( 35 % ) due . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest income</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 407</td><td>$ 653</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other income ( expense ) net</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>-81 ( 81 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total other income and expense</td><td>$ 155</td><td>$ 326</td><td>$ 620</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the effective tax rate for years 2010 and 2009?\nAnswer: 56.0\nQuestion: what was the effective tax rate in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "32.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5552	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to the audited consolidated financial statements director stock compensation subplan eastman's 2016 director stock compensation subplan ( \"directors' subplan\" ) , a component of the 2012 omnibus plan , remains in effect until terminated by the board of directors or the earlier termination of thf e 2012 omnibus plan . the directors' subplan provides for structured awards of restricted shares to non-employee members of the board of directors . restricted shares awarded under the directors' subplan are subject to the same terms and conditions of the 2012 omnibus plan . the directors' subplan does not constitute a separate source of shares for grant of equity awards and all shares awarded are part of the 10 million shares authorized under the 2012 omnibus plan . shares of restricted stock are granted on the first day of a non-f employee director's initial term of service and shares of restricted stock are granted each year to each non-employee director on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders . general the company is authorized by the board of directors under the 2012 omnibus plan tof provide awards to employees and non- employee members of the board of directors . it has been the company's practice to issue new shares rather than treasury shares for equity awards that require settlement by the issuance of common stock and to withhold or accept back shares awarded to cover the related income tax obligations of employee participants . shares of unrestricted common stock owned by non-d employee directors are not eligible to be withheld or acquired to satisfy the withholding obligation related to their income taxes . aa shares of unrestricted common stock owned by specified senior management level employees are accepted by the company to pay the exercise price of stock options in accordance with the terms and conditions of their awards . for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , total share-based compensation expense ( before tax ) of approximately $ 36 million , $ 36 million , and $ 28 million , respectively , was recognized in selling , general and administrative exd pense in the consolidated statements of earnings , comprehensive income and retained earnings for all share-based awards of which approximately $ 7 million , $ 7 million , and $ 4 million , respectively , related to stock options . the compensation expense is recognized over the substantive vesting period , which may be a shorter time period than the stated vesting period for qualifying termination eligible employees as defined in the forms of award notice . for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , approximately $ 2 million , $ 2 million , and $ 1 million , respectively , of stock option compensation expense was recognized due to qualifying termination eligibility preceding the requisite vesting period . stock option awards options have been granted on an annual basis to non-employee directors under the directors' subplan and predecessor plans and by the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors under the 2012 omnibus plan and predecessor plans to employees . option awards have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the company's stock on the date of grant . the term of options is 10 years with vesting periods thf at vary up to three years . vesting usually occurs ratably over the vesting period or at the end of the vesting period . the company utilizes the black scholes merton option valuation model which relies on certain assumptions to estimate an option's fair value . the weighted average assumptions used in the determination of fair value for stock options awarded in 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 are provided in the table below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumptions</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility rate</td><td>23.71% ( 23.71 % )</td><td>24.11% ( 24.11 % )</td><td>25.82% ( 25.82 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.31% ( 2.31 % )</td><td>1.75% ( 1.75 % )</td><td>1.70% ( 1.70 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.23% ( 1.23 % )</td><td>1.45% ( 1.45 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected term years</td><td>5.0</td><td>4.8</td><td>4.7</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the stock option compensation expense was recognized due to qualifying termination eligibility in 2015 and 2016?\nAnswer: 4.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum including 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10949	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin april 2009 , the fasb issued additional guidance under asc 820 which provides guidance on estimat- ing the fair value of an asset or liability ( financial or nonfinancial ) when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased , and on identifying transactions that are not orderly . the application of the requirements of this guidance did not have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements . in august 2009 , the fasb issued asu 2009-05 , 201cmeasuring liabilities at fair value , 201d which further amends asc 820 by providing clarification for cir- cumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available . the company included the disclosures required by this guidance in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in june 2006 , the fasb issued guidance under asc 740 , 201cincome taxes 201d ( formerly fin 48 ) . this guid- ance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in tax returns . specifically , the financial statement effects of a tax position may be recognized only when it is determined that it is 201cmore likely than not 201d that , based on its technical merits , the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax authority . the amount recognized shall be measured as the largest amount of tax benefits that exceed a 50% ( 50 % ) probability of being recognized . this guidance also expands income tax disclosure requirements . international paper applied the provisions of this guidance begin- ning in the first quarter of 2007 . the adoption of this guidance resulted in a charge to the beginning bal- ance of retained earnings of $ 94 million at the date of adoption . note 3 industry segment information financial information by industry segment and geo- graphic area for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 is presented on pages 47 and 48 . effective january 1 , 2008 , the company changed its method of allocating corpo- rate overhead expenses to its business segments to increase the expense amounts allocated to these businesses in reports reviewed by its chief executive officer to facilitate performance comparisons with other companies . accordingly , the company has revised its presentation of industry segment operat- ing profit to reflect this change in allocation method , and has adjusted all comparative prior period information on this basis . note 4 earnings per share attributable to international paper company common shareholders basic earnings per common share from continuing operations are computed by dividing earnings from continuing operations by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding . diluted earnings per common share from continuing oper- ations are computed assuming that all potentially dilutive securities , including 201cin-the-money 201d stock options , were converted into common shares at the beginning of each year . in addition , the computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the inclusion of contingently convertible securities in periods when dilutive . a reconciliation of the amounts included in the computation of basic earnings per common share from continuing operations , and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations is as fol- in millions except per share amounts 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 663</td><td>$ -1269 ( 1269 )</td><td>$ 1215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations 2013 assumingdilution</td><td>$ 663</td><td>$ -1269 ( 1269 )</td><td>$ 1215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average common shares outstanding</td><td>425.3</td><td>421.0</td><td>428.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of dilutive securities restricted performance share plan ( a )</td><td>2.7</td><td>2013</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stock options ( b )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>0.4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution</td><td>428.0</td><td>421.0</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations</td><td>$ 1.56</td><td>$ -3.02 ( 3.02 )</td><td>$ 2.83</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations</td><td>$ 1.55</td><td>$ -3.02 ( 3.02 )</td><td>$ 2.81</td></tr></table> average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution 428.0 421.0 433.0 basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations $ 1.56 $ ( 3.02 ) $ 2.83 diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations $ 1.55 $ ( 3.02 ) $ 2.81 ( a ) securities are not included in the table in periods when anti- dilutive . ( b ) options to purchase 22.2 million , 25.1 million and 17.5 million shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , were not included in the computation of diluted common shares outstanding because their exercise price exceeded the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for each respective reporting date . note 5 restructuring and other charges this footnote discusses restructuring and other charges recorded for each of the three years included in the period ended december 31 , 2009 . it .\nQuestion: what is the sum of earnings (loss) from continuing operations in 2008 and 2009?\nAnswer: -606.0\nQuestion: what are earnings (loss) in 2008?\nAnswer: 1215.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum for the 3 years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "609.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6195	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nadobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 . other assets other assets as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>$ 84313</td><td>$ 90643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investments</td><td>63526</td><td>76589</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>security and other deposits</td><td>11692</td><td>16087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>prepaid royalties</td><td>12059</td><td>9026</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred compensation plan assets</td><td>9045</td><td>7560</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>restricted cash</td><td>4650</td><td>7361</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>prepaid land lease</td><td>3209</td><td>3185</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>prepaid rent</td><td>1377</td><td>2658</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other</td><td>1394</td><td>3420</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other assets</td><td>$ 191265</td><td>$ 216529</td></tr></table> acquired rights to use technology purchased during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was $ 6.0 million and $ 100.4 million , respectively . of the cost for fiscal 2008 , an estimated $ 56.4 million was related to future licensing rights and has been capitalized and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives up to fifteen years . of the remaining costs for fiscal 2008 , we estimated that $ 27.2 million was related to historical use of licensing rights which was expensed as cost of sales and the residual of $ 16.8 million for fiscal 2008 was expensed as general and administrative costs . in connection with these licensing arrangements , we have the ability to acquire additional rights to use technology in the future . see note 17 for further information regarding our contractual commitments . in general , acquired rights to use technology are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 15 years . included in investments are our indirect investments through our limited partnership interest in adobe ventures of approximately $ 37.1 million and $ 39.0 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which is consolidated in accordance with the provisions for consolidating variable interest entities . the partnership is controlled by granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures . we are the primary beneficiary of adobe ventures and bear virtually all of the risks and rewards related to our ownership . our investment in adobe ventures does not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . adobe ventures carries its investments in equity securities at estimated fair value and investment gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of income . substantially all of the investments held by adobe ventures at november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 are not publicly traded and , therefore , there is no established market for these securities . in order to determine the fair value of these investments , we use the most recent round of financing involving new non-strategic investors or estimates of current market value made by granite ventures . it is our policy to evaluate the fair value of these investments held by adobe ventures , as well as our direct investments , on a regular basis . this evaluation includes , but is not limited to , reviewing each company 2019s cash position , financing needs , earnings and revenue outlook , operational performance , management and ownership changes and competition . in the case of privately-held companies , this evaluation is based on information that we request from these companies . this information is not subject to the same disclosure regulations as u.s . publicly traded companies and as such , the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and the accuracy of the data received from these companies . see note 4 for further information regarding adobe ventures . also included in investments are our direct investments in privately-held companies of approximately $ 26.4 million and $ 37.6 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which are accounted for based on the cost method . we assess these investments for impairment in value as circumstances dictate . see note 4 for further information regarding our cost method investments . we entered into a purchase and sale agreement , effective may 12 , 2008 , for the acquisition of real property located in waltham , massachusetts . we purchased the property upon completion of construction of an office building shell and core , parking structure , and site improvements . the purchase price for the property was $ 44.7 million and closed on june 16 , 2009 . we made an initial deposit of $ 7.0 million which was included in security and other deposits as of november 28 , 2008 and the remaining balance was paid at closing . this deposit was held in escrow until closing and then applied to the purchase price. .\nQuestion: what was the difference is other assets from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: -25264.0\nQuestion: what was the value of other assets in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "216529.0" } ]
CONVFINQA622	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfreesheet paper were higher in russia , but lower in europe reflecting weak economic conditions and market demand . average sales price realizations for pulp decreased . lower input costs for wood and purchased fiber were partially offset by higher costs for energy , chemicals and packaging . freight costs were also higher . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher due to executing a significant once-every-ten-years maintenance outage plus the regularly scheduled 18-month outage at the saillat mill while outage costs in russia and poland were lower . manufacturing operating costs were favor- entering 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be seasonally weaker in russia , but about flat in europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper are expected to decrease in europe , but increase in russia . input costs should be higher in russia , especially for wood and energy , but be slightly lower in europe . no maintenance outages are scheduled for the first quarter . ind ian papers includes the results of andhra pradesh paper mills ( appm ) of which a 75% ( 75 % ) interest was acquired on october 14 , 2011 . net sales were $ 185 million in 2012 and $ 35 million in 2011 . operat- ing profits were a loss of $ 16 million in 2012 and a loss of $ 3 million in 2011 . asian pr int ing papers net sales were $ 85 mil- lion in 2012 , $ 75 million in 2011 and $ 80 million in 2010 . operating profits were improved from break- even in past years to $ 1 million in 2012 . u.s . pulp net sales were $ 725 million in 2012 compared with $ 725 million in 2011 and $ 715 million in 2010 . operating profits were a loss of $ 59 million in 2012 compared with gains of $ 87 million in 2011 and $ 107 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 increased from 2011 primarily due to the start-up of pulp production at the franklin mill in the third quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations were significantly lower for both fluff pulp and market pulp . input costs were lower , primarily for wood and energy . freight costs were slightly lower . mill operating costs were unfavorable primarily due to costs associated with the start-up of the franklin mill . planned maintenance downtime costs were lower . in the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be flat with the fourth quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations are expected to improve reflecting the realization of sales price increases for paper and tissue pulp that were announced in the fourth quarter of 2012 . input costs should be flat . planned maintenance downtime costs should be about $ 9 million higher than in the fourth quarter of 2012 . manufacturing costs related to the franklin mill should be lower as we continue to improve operations . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2012 decreased 15% ( 15 % ) from 2011 and 7% ( 7 % ) from 2010 . operating profits increased 64% ( 64 % ) from 2011 and 29% ( 29 % ) from 2010 . net sales and operating profits include the shorewood business in 2011 and 2010 . exclud- ing asset impairment and other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business , and facility closure costs , 2012 operating profits were 27% ( 27 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 23% ( 23 % ) higher than in 2010 . benefits from lower raw material costs ( $ 22 million ) , lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 5 million ) and other items ( $ 2 million ) were more than offset by lower sales price realizations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 66 million ) , lower sales volumes and increased market-related downtime ( $ 22 million ) , and higher operating costs ( $ 40 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2012 included a gain of $ 3 million related to the sale of the shorewood business while operating profits in 2011 included a $ 129 million fixed asset impairment charge for the north ameri- can shorewood business and $ 72 million for other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3170</td><td>$ 3710</td><td>$ 3400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>268</td><td>163</td><td>207</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2011 and $ 2.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits were $ 165 million ( $ 162 million excluding a gain related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2012 compared with $ 35 million ( $ 236 million excluding asset impairment and other charges asso- ciated with the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2011 and $ 97 million ( $ 105 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting weaker market demand . average sales price realizations were lower , primar- ily for folding carton board . input costs for wood increased , but were partially offset by lower costs for chemicals and energy . planned maintenance down- time costs were slightly lower . market-related down- time was about 113000 tons in 2012 compared with about 38000 tons in 2011. .\nQuestion: what is 2 times 1000?\nAnswer: 2000.0\nQuestion: what is that divided by 2012 sales?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.63091" } ]
CONVFINQA3478	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in \"general and administrative expenses\" . effective january 1 , 2017 , the company adopted asu 2016-09 , improvements to employee share- based payment accounting , which allows employers to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur . the company elected this option using the modified retrospective transition method , with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings , and there was no material effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations taken as a whole resulting from the reversal of previously estimated forfeitures . total compensation expense under the stock plan was approximately $ 10.8 million , $ 12.2 million and $ 6.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was approximately $ 0.2 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was approximately $ 14.1 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.2 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 4.8 million , $ 2.0 million and $ 1.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is listed below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , was $ 84.53 , $ 73.20 and $ 68.35 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free rate</td><td>0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )</td><td>0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )</td><td>0.10% ( 0.10 % ) - 1.05% ( 1.05 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.573% ( 3.573 % )</td><td>3.634% ( 3.634 % )</td><td>3.932% ( 3.932 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )</td><td>18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )</td><td>15.41% ( 15.41 % ) - 16.04% ( 16.04 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>requisite service period</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td></tr></table> the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the date of grant . volatility for maa was obtained by using a blend of both historical and implied volatility calculations . historical volatility was based on the standard deviation of daily total continuous returns , and implied volatility was based on the trailing month average of daily implied volatilities interpolating between the volatilities implied by stock call option contracts that were closest to the terms shown and closest to the money . the minimum volatility was based on a period of 3 years , 2 years and 1 year for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the maximum volatility was based on a period of 1 year , 1 year and 2 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the requisite service period is based on the criteria for the separate programs according to the vesting schedule. .\nQuestion: what was the change in weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock from 2016 to 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11.33" } ]
CONVFINQA4150	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nj.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report 65 the commercial specific loss component of the allowance was $ 917 million at december 31 , 2003 , a decrease of 43% ( 43 % ) from year-end 2002 . the decrease was attributable to the improve- ment in the credit quality of the commercial loan portfolio , as well as the reduction in the size of the portfolio . the commercial expected loss component of the allowance was $ 454 million at december 31 , 2003 , a decrease of 26% ( 26 % ) from year- end 2002 . the decrease reflected an improvement in the average quality of the loan portfolio , as well as the improving credit envi- ronment , which affected inputs to the expected loss model . the consumer expected loss component of the allowance was $ 2.3 billion at december 31 , 2003 , a decrease of 4% ( 4 % ) from year- end 2002 . although the consumer managed loan portfolio increased by 10% ( 10 % ) , the businesses that drove the increase , home finance and auto finance , have collateralized products with lower expected loss rates . the residual component of the allowance was $ 895 million at december 31 , 2003 . the residual component , which incorpo- rates management's judgment , addresses uncertainties that are not considered in the formula-based commercial specific and expected components of the allowance for credit losses . the $ 121 million increase addressed uncertainties in the eco- nomic environment and concentrations in the commercial loan portfolio that existed during the first half of 2003 . in the sec- ond half of the year , as commercial credit quality continued to improve and the commercial allowance declined further , the residual component was reduced as well . at december 31 , 2003 , the residual component represented approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of the total allowance for loan losses , within the firm 2019s target range of between 10% ( 10 % ) and 20% ( 20 % ) . the firm anticipates that if the current positive trend in economic conditions and credit quality continues , the commercial and residual components will continue to be reduced . lending-related commitments to provide for the risk of loss inherent in the credit-extension process , management also computes specific and expected loss components as well as a residual component for commercial lending 2013related commitments . this is computed using a methodology similar to that used for the commercial loan port- folio , modified for expected maturities and probabilities of drawdown . the allowance decreased by 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 324 million as of december 31 , 2003 , due to improvement in the criticized portion of the firm 2019s lending-related commitments . credit costs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>for the year ended december 31 commercial</td><td>for the year ended december 31 consumer</td><td>for the year ended december 31 residual</td><td>for the year ended december 31 total</td><td>for the year ended december 31 commercial</td><td>for the year ended december 31 consumer</td><td>residual</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>provision for loan losses</td><td>$ -30 ( 30 )</td><td>$ 1491</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 1579</td><td>$ 2371</td><td>$ 1589</td><td>$ 79</td><td>$ 4039</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>provision for lending-related commitments</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>2014</td><td>8</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>309</td><td>2014</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>292</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securitized credit losses</td><td>2014</td><td>1870</td><td>2014</td><td>1870</td><td>2014</td><td>1439</td><td>2014</td><td>1439</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total managed credit costs</td><td>$ -77 ( 77 )</td><td>$ 3361</td><td>$ 126</td><td>$ 3410</td><td>$ 2680</td><td>$ 3028</td><td>$ 62</td><td>$ 5770</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: how much, in percentage, is the consumer expected loss allowance in 2003 in relation to the consumer expected loss allowance in 2002, considering the percentage decrease over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "96.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5384	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 49</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>63</td><td>80</td><td>92</td><td>94</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>45</td><td>52</td><td>59</td><td>49</td><td>63</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the s&p 500 index from 2007 to 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-20.0" } ]
CONVFINQA564	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td><td>10/30/2016</td><td>10/29/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>171.03</td><td>207.01</td><td>165.34</td><td>293.64</td><td>586.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.18</td><td>149.14</td><td>156.89</td><td>163.97</td><td>202.72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>131.94</td><td>167.25</td><td>160.80</td><td>193.36</td><td>288.96</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of an $100 investment in applied materials from 2012 to 2015?\nAnswer: 65.34\nQuestion: what roi does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.6534\nQuestion: what about the net change in value in s&p500 for the same period?\nAnswer: 56.89\nQuestion: what is the roi of s&p500?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.5689" } ]
CONVFINQA1888	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n$ 25.7 million in cash , including $ 4.2 million in taxes and 1373609 of hep 2019s common units having a fair value of $ 53.5 million . roadrunner / beeson pipelines transaction also on december 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our two newly constructed pipelines for $ 46.5 million , consisting of a 65- mile , 16-inch crude oil pipeline ( the 201croadrunner pipeline 201d ) that connects our navajo refinery lovington facility to a terminus of centurion pipeline l.p . 2019s pipeline extending between west texas and cushing , oklahoma and a 37- mile , 8-inch crude oil pipeline that connects hep 2019s new mexico crude oil gathering system to our navajo refinery lovington facility ( the 201cbeeson pipeline 201d ) . tulsa west loading racks transaction on august 1 , 2009 , hep acquired from us , certain truck and rail loading/unloading facilities located at our tulsa west facility for $ 17.5 million . the racks load refined products and lube oils produced at the tulsa west facility onto rail cars and/or tanker trucks . lovington-artesia pipeline transaction on june 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our newly constructed , 16-inch intermediate pipeline for $ 34.2 million that runs 65 miles from our navajo refinery 2019s crude oil distillation and vacuum facilities in lovington , new mexico to its petroleum refinery located in artesia , new mexico . slc pipeline joint venture interest on march 1 , 2009 , hep acquired a 25% ( 25 % ) joint venture interest in the slc pipeline , a new 95-mile intrastate pipeline system jointly owned with plains . the slc pipeline commenced operations effective march 2009 and allows various refineries in the salt lake city area , including our woods cross refinery , to ship crude oil into the salt lake city area from the utah terminus of the frontier pipeline as well as crude oil flowing from wyoming and utah via plains 2019 rocky mountain pipeline . hep 2019s capitalized joint venture contribution was $ 25.5 million . rio grande pipeline sale on december 1 , 2009 , hep sold its 70% ( 70 % ) interest in rio grande pipeline company ( 201crio grande 201d ) to a subsidiary of enterprise products partners lp for $ 35 million . results of operations of rio grande are presented in discontinued operations . in accounting for this sale , hep recorded a gain of $ 14.5 million and a receivable of $ 2.2 million representing its final distribution from rio grande . the recorded net asset balance of rio grande at december 1 , 2009 , was $ 22.7 million , consisting of cash of $ 3.1 million , $ 29.9 million in properties and equipment , net and $ 10.3 million in equity , representing bp , plc 2019s 30% ( 30 % ) noncontrolling interest . the following table provides income statement information related to hep 2019s discontinued operations : year ended december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>$ 5367</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-942 ( 942 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>4425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>14479</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-1978 ( 1978 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations net</td><td>12501</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>$ 16926</td></tr></table> transportation agreements hep serves our refineries under long-term pipeline and terminal , tankage and throughput agreements expiring in 2019 through 2026 . under these agreements , we pay hep fees to transport , store and throughput volumes of refined product and crude oil on hep 2019s pipeline and terminal , tankage and loading rack facilities that result in minimum annual payments to hep . under these agreements , the agreed upon tariff rates are subject to annual tariff rate adjustments on july 1 at a rate based upon the percentage change in producer price index ( 201cppi 201d ) or federal energy .\nQuestion: in the year of 2009, how much did the income tax expense represent in relation to the gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.13661" } ]
CONVFINQA6404	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index january 3 , january 2 , january 1 , december 31 , december 29 , december 28 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>january 3 2009</td><td>january 2 2010</td><td>january 1 2011</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 29 2012</td><td>december 28 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>advance auto parts</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.28</td><td>$ 195.80</td><td>$ 206.86</td><td>$ 213.14</td><td>$ 327.63</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>119.67</td><td>134.97</td><td>134.96</td><td>150.51</td><td>197.62</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p retail index</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.28</td><td>174.70</td><td>179.79</td><td>219.77</td><td>321.02</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of a $100 investment in s&p 500 index from 2009 to 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "34.97" } ]
CONVFINQA769	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) detail with respect to our investment portfolio as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 is provided in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . loans and leases averaged $ 15.91 billion for the year ended 2014 , up from $ 13.78 billion in 2013 . the increase was mainly related to mutual fund lending and our continued investment in senior secured bank loans . mutual fund lending and senior secured bank loans averaged approximately $ 9.12 billion and $ 1.40 billion , respectively , for the year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to $ 8.16 billion and $ 170 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , respectively . average loans and leases also include short- duration advances . table 13 : u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2355</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1512</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3867</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average short-durance advances to average loans and leases</td><td>24% ( 24 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> average u.s . short-duration advances $ 2355 $ 2356 $ 1972 average non-u.s . short-duration advances 1512 1393 1393 average total short-duration advances $ 3867 $ 3749 $ 3365 average short-durance advances to average loans and leases 24% ( 24 % ) 27% ( 27 % ) 29% ( 29 % ) the decline in proportion of the average daily short-duration advances to average loans and leases is primarily due to growth in the other segments of the loan and lease portfolio . short-duration advances provide liquidity to clients in support of their investment activities . although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2013 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 15.94 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our enhanced custody business . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 130.30 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 109.25 billion for year ended 2013 . the higher levels were primarily the result of increases in both u.s . and non-u.s . transaction accounts and time deposits . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings increased to $ 4.18 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 3.79 billion for the year ended 2013 . the increase was the result of a higher level of client demand for our commercial paper . the decline in rates paid from 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) in 2013 to 0.1% ( 0.1 % ) in 2014 resulted from a reclassification of certain derivative contracts that hedge our interest-rate risk on certain assets and liabilities , which reduced interest revenue and interest expense . average long-term debt increased to $ 9.31 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in november 2013 , and $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in december 2014 . this is partially offset by the maturities of $ 500 million of senior debt in may 2014 and $ 250 million of senior debt in march 2014 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 7.35 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our enhanced custody business . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay-downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , municipal securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to influence what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .\nQuestion: what was the average long-term debt in 2014, in billions?\nAnswer: 9.31\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013, also in billions?\nAnswer: 8.42\nQuestion: by how much, then, did it increase over the year, in billions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.89" } ]
CONVFINQA6140	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( 1 ) the cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends . ( 2 ) the total return is weighted according to market capitalization of each company at the beginning of each year . ( f ) purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers we have not repurchased any of our common stock since the company filed its initial registration statement on march 16 , ( g ) securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans a description of securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 6 . selected financial data . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td><td>year ended december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td><td>$ 5692</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>290</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>2490</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>110</td><td>248</td><td>211</td><td>-2354 ( 2354 )</td><td>447</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td><td>135</td><td>124</td><td>-2420 ( 2420 )</td><td>276</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6001</td><td>5203</td><td>5036</td><td>4760</td><td>7658</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>3757</td><td>1559</td><td>1645</td><td>1761</td><td>1790</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td><td>364</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .\nQuestion: what was the operating income in 2011?\nAnswer: 110.0\nQuestion: and the goodwill impairment for that year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "290.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2897	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2018 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 2641</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 2564</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>3139</td><td>91</td><td>3048</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>3561</td><td>115</td><td>3446</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>3994</td><td>140</td><td>3854</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>4357</td><td>169</td><td>4188</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2014 2013 2018</td><td>25807</td><td>1269</td><td>24538</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense in accordance with sfas no . 112 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for postemployment benefits 201d by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 2643 , $ ( 3418 ) and $ 8400 , respectively , during the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the company has an accrued liability related to the severance plan and other severance obligations in the amount of $ 63863 and $ 56172 at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . a facility fee of 8 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 2030 , is paid annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 37 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 for the credit facility which are being amortized straight- line over three years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility or prior facilities totaled $ 2353 , $ 2477 and $ 2717 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2008 or december 31 , 2007 . the majority of credit facility lenders are customers or affiliates of customers of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 .\nQuestion: what is the expected benefit payments in 2010?\nAnswer: 3139.0\nQuestion: what about in 2009?\nAnswer: 2641.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of 2010 to 2009?\nAnswer: 1.18856\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.18856" } ]
CONVFINQA9654	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 4036</td><td>$ 4347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>-1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>643</td><td>987</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>8</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td><td>.73% ( .73 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.84</td><td>2.17</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td><td>$ -359 ( 359 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td><td>-930 ( 930 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>$ -1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td><td>.35% ( .35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>1.07</td><td>1.24</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what is the provision for credit losses in 2013?\nAnswer: 643.0\nQuestion: what about in 2012?\nAnswer: 987.0\nQuestion: what is the change in provision for credit losses?\nAnswer: -344.0\nQuestion: what is the provision for credit losses in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "987.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4179	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>284.5</td><td>287.8</td><td>299.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>2.3</td><td>2.8</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations</td><td>286.8</td><td>290.6</td><td>303.1</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) . consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting . under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales . accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s . gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value . accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million . the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows . in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office . the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes . the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach . divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) . the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer . under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock . at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange . the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) . following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos . as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock . we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction . based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares . in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses . the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 . the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .\nQuestion: what was the total of weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations in 2018?\nAnswer: 284.5\nQuestion: and what was it in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "287.8" } ]
CONVFINQA8198	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) contingent consideration liabilities recorded in connection with business acquisitions must also be adjusted for changes in fair value until settled . see note 3 for discussion of the capital markets company bvba ( \"capco\" ) contingent consideration liability . ( d ) derivative financial instruments the company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with financial accounting standards board accounting standards codification ( 201cfasb asc 201d ) topic 815 , derivatives and hedging . during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company engaged in g hedging activities relating to its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps . the company designates these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges . the estimated fair values of the cash flow hedges are determined using level 2 type measurements . thh ey are recorded as an asset or liability of the company and are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets , other non-current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities , as appropriate , and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is recorded in interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on then company 2019s term and revolving loans ( note 10 ) . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedge is highly effective and there was no impact on 2016 earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . as of december 31 , 2016 , we believe that our interest rate swap counterparty will be able to fulfill its obligations under our agreement . the company's foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in the company's results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . during 2016 and 2015 , the company entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and aa $ 81 million , respectively , and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes . we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( \"inr\" ) ii exchange rates . as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was l less than $ 1 million , which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges . the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency uu exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third party banks , at the balance sheet date . the fair value of forward rr contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates . the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward ff contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges . in september 2015 , the company entered into treasury lock hedges with a total notional amount of $ 1.0 billion , reducing the risk of changes in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield . the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges . on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income . ( e ) trade receivables a summary of trade receivables , net , as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trade receivables 2014 billed</td><td>$ 1452</td><td>$ 1546</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trade receivables 2014 unbilled</td><td>228</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total trade receivables</td><td>1680</td><td>1747</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allowance for doubtful accounts</td><td>-41 ( 41 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total trade receivables net</td><td>$ 1639</td><td>$ 1731</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total net trade receivables for 2016?\nAnswer: 1639.0\nQuestion: and for 2015?\nAnswer: 1731.0\nQuestion: what was the difference in value between these two years?\nAnswer: -92.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.05315" } ]
CONVFINQA11099	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntransfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>2140511</td><td>$ 20.54</td><td>2139507</td><td>$ 227368014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1126378</td><td>$ 22.95</td><td>1124601</td><td>$ 201557625</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1881992</td><td>$ 22.97</td><td>1872650</td><td>$ 158553178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5148881</td><td>$ 21.96</td><td>5136758</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .\nQuestion: in october of 2015, what was the total amount spent in the repurchase of shares?\nAnswer: 43966095.94\nQuestion: and how much is that in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "43.9661" } ]
CONVFINQA3193	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nabiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 12 . stock award plans and stock based compensation ( continued ) compensation expense recognized related to the company 2019s espp was approximately $ 0.1 million for each of the years ended march 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 respectively . the fair value of shares issued under the employee stock purchase plan was estimated on the commencement date of each offering period using the black-scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.01% ( 1.01 % )</td><td>4.61% ( 4.61 % )</td><td>4.84% ( 4.84 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>0.5</td><td>0.5</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>67.2% ( 67.2 % )</td><td>45.2% ( 45.2 % )</td><td>39.8% ( 39.8 % )</td></tr></table> note 13 . capital stock in august 2008 , the company issued 2419932 shares of its common stock at a price of $ 17.3788 in a public offering , which resulted in net proceeds to the company of approximately $ 42.0 million , after deducting offering expenses . in march 2007 , the company issued 5000000 shares of common stock in a public offering , and in april 2007 , an additional 80068 shares of common stock were issued in connection with the offering upon the partial exercise of the underwriters 2019 over-allotment option . the company has authorized 1000000 shares of class b preferred stock , $ 0.01 par value , of which the board of directors can set the designation , rights and privileges . no shares of class b preferred stock have been issued or are outstanding . note 14 . income taxes deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to tax benefit carryforwards and to differences between the financial statement amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis . deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates . a valuation reserve is established if it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized . the tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized . at march 31 , 2009 , the company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards , or nols , of approximately $ 145.1 million and $ 97.1 million , respectively , which begin to expire in fiscal 2010 . additionally , at march 31 , 2009 , the company had federal and state research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.1 million and $ 4.2 million , respectively , which begin to expire in fiscal 2010 . the company acquired impella , a german-based company , in may 2005 . impella had pre-acquisition net operating losses of approximately $ 18.2 million at the time of acquisition ( which is denominated in euros and is subject to foreign exchange remeasurement at each balance sheet date presented ) , and has since incurred net operating losses in each fiscal year since the acquisition . during fiscal 2008 , the company determined that approximately $ 1.2 million of pre-acquisition operating losses could not be utilized . the utilization of pre-acquisition net operating losses of impella in future periods is subject to certain statutory approvals and business requirements . due to uncertainties surrounding the company 2019s ability to generate future taxable income to realize these assets , a full valuation allowance has been established to offset the company 2019s net deferred tax assets and liabilities . additionally , the future utilization of the company 2019s nol and research and development credit carry forwards to offset future taxable income may be subject to a substantial annual limitation under section 382 of the internal revenue code due to ownership changes that have occurred previously or that could occur in the future . ownership changes , as defined in section 382 of the internal revenue code , can limit the amount of net operating loss carry forwards and research and development credit carry forwards that a company can use each year to offset future taxable income and taxes payable . the company believes that all of its federal and state nol 2019s will be available for carryforward to future tax periods , subject to the statutory maximum carryforward limitation of any annual nol . any future potential limitation to all or a portion of the nol or research and development credit carry forwards , before they can be utilized , would reduce the company 2019s gross deferred tax assets . the company will monitor subsequent ownership changes , which could impose limitations in the future. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the risk-free interest rate from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: -0.23\nQuestion: what was the rate in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.84" } ]
CONVFINQA7915	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following table presents average u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances for the years ended december 31 : years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td><td>$ 1994</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td><td>1585</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td><td>$ 3579</td></tr></table> although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2013 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2012 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.38 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 109.25 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 98.39 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . this increase was mainly due to higher levels of non-u.s . transaction accounts associated with the growth of new and existing business in assets under custody and administration . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings declined to $ 3.79 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 4.68 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , as higher levels of client deposits provided additional liquidity . average long-term debt increased to $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.01 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of extendible notes by state street bank in december 2012 , the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , and the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of senior debt in november 2013 . this increase was partly offset by maturities of $ 1.75 billion of senior debt in the second quarter of 2012 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 5.90 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay- downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to dictate what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .\nQuestion: what was the average total short-duration advances in 2012?\nAnswer: 3365.0\nQuestion: and for 2011?\nAnswer: 3579.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference between the two years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-214.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1595	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe also record an inventory obsolescence reserve , which represents the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value , based on various product sales projections . this reserve is calcu- lated using an estimated obsolescence percentage applied to the inventory based on age , historical trends and requirements to support forecasted sales . in addition , and as necessary , we may establish specific reserves for future known or anticipated events . pension and other post-retirement benefit costs we offer the following benefits to some or all of our employees : a domestic trust-based noncontributory qual- ified defined benefit pension plan ( 201cu.s . qualified plan 201d ) and an unfunded , non-qualified domestic noncon- tributory pension plan to provide benefits in excess of statutory limitations ( collectively with the u.s . qualified plan , the 201cdomestic plans 201d ) ; a domestic contributory defined contribution plan ; international pension plans , which vary by country , consisting of both defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans ; deferred compensation arrangements ; and certain other post- retirement benefit plans . the amounts needed to fund future payouts under our defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans are subject to numerous assumptions and variables . cer- tain significant variables require us to make assumptions that are within our control such as an anticipated discount rate , expected rate of return on plan assets and future compensation levels . we evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial advisors and select assumptions that we believe reflect the economics underlying our pension and post-retirement obligations . while we believe these assumptions are within accepted industry ranges , an increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control could have a direct impact on reported net earnings . the discount rate for each plan used for determining future net periodic benefit cost is based on a review of highly rated long-term bonds . for fiscal 2013 , we used a discount rate for our domestic plans of 3.90% ( 3.90 % ) and vary- ing rates on our international plans of between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) . the discount rate for our domestic plans is based on a bond portfolio that includes only long-term bonds with an aa rating , or equivalent , from a major rating agency . as of june 30 , 2013 , we used an above-mean yield curve , rather than the broad-based yield curve we used before , because we believe it represents a better estimate of an effective settlement rate of the obligation , and the timing and amount of cash flows related to the bonds included in this portfolio are expected to match the estimated defined benefit payment streams of our domestic plans . the benefit obligation of our domestic plans would have been higher by approximately $ 34 mil- lion at june 30 , 2013 had we not used the above-mean yield curve . for our international plans , the discount rate in a particular country was principally determined based on a yield curve constructed from high quality corporate bonds in each country , with the resulting portfolio having a duration matching that particular plan . for fiscal 2013 , we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for our u.s . qualified plan and varying rates of between 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for our international plans . in determining the long-term rate of return for a plan , we consider the historical rates of return , the nature of the plan 2019s investments and an expectation for the plan 2019s investment strategies . see 201cnote 12 2014 pension , deferred compensation and post-retirement benefit plans 201d of notes to consolidated financial statements for details regarding the nature of our pension and post-retirement plan invest- ments . the difference between actual and expected return on plan assets is reported as a component of accu- mulated other comprehensive income . those gains/losses that are subject to amortization over future periods will be recognized as a component of the net periodic benefit cost in such future periods . for fiscal 2013 , our pension plans had actual return on assets of approximately $ 74 million as compared with expected return on assets of approximately $ 64 million . the resulting net deferred gain of approximately $ 10 million , when combined with gains and losses from previous years , will be amortized over periods ranging from approximately 7 to 22 years . the actual return on plan assets from our international pen- sion plans exceeded expectations , primarily reflecting a strong performance from fixed income and equity invest- ments . the lower than expected return on assets from our u.s . qualified plan was primarily due to weakness in our fixed income investments , partially offset by our strong equity returns . a 25 basis-point change in the discount rate or the expected rate of return on plan assets would have had the following effect on fiscal 2013 pension expense : 25 basis-point 25 basis-point increase decrease ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>25 basis-point increase</td><td>25 basis-point decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discount rate</td><td>$ -3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>$ 3.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected return on assets</td><td>$ -2.5 ( 2.5 )</td><td>$ 2.7</td></tr></table> our post-retirement plans are comprised of health care plans that could be impacted by health care cost trend rates , which may have a significant effect on the amounts the est{e lauder companies inc . 115 .\nQuestion: what was the low rate for international plans?\nAnswer: 0.0225\nQuestion: what was the high rate for international plans?\nAnswer: 0.07\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 0.0925\nQuestion: what is the average rate?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.04625" } ]
CONVFINQA6070	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 selling costs increased $ 25.0 million to $ 94.6 million in 2010 from $ 69.6 million in 2009 . this increase was primarily due to higher personnel and other costs incurred for the continued expansion of our direct to consumer distribution channel and higher selling personnel costs , including increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , selling costs increased to 8.9% ( 8.9 % ) in 2010 from 8.1% ( 8.1 % ) in 2009 primarily due to higher personnel and other costs incurred for the continued expansion of our factory house stores . 2022 product innovation and supply chain costs increased $ 25.0 million to $ 96.8 million in 2010 from $ 71.8 million in 2009 primarily due to higher personnel costs for the design and sourcing of our expanding apparel , footwear and accessories lines and higher distribution facilities operating and personnel costs as compared to the prior year to support our growth in net revenues . in addition , we incurred higher expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , product innovation and supply chain costs increased to 9.1% ( 9.1 % ) in 2010 from 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) in 2009 primarily due to the items noted above . 2022 corporate services costs increased $ 24.0 million to $ 98.6 million in 2010 from $ 74.6 million in 2009 . this increase was attributable primarily to higher corporate facility costs , information technology initiatives and corporate personnel costs , including increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , corporate services costs increased to 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) in 2010 from 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) in 2009 primarily due to the items noted above . income from operations increased $ 27.1 million , or 31.8% ( 31.8 % ) , to $ 112.4 million in 2010 from $ 85.3 million in 2009 . income from operations as a percentage of net revenues increased to 10.6% ( 10.6 % ) in 2010 from 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) in 2009 . this increase was a result of the items discussed above . interest expense , net remained unchanged at $ 2.3 million in 2010 and 2009 . other expense , net increased $ 0.7 million to $ 1.2 million in 2010 from $ 0.5 million in 2009 . the increase in 2010 was due to higher net losses on the combined foreign currency exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in the euro and canadian dollar and our derivative financial instruments as compared to 2009 . provision for income taxes increased $ 4.8 million to $ 40.4 million in 2010 from $ 35.6 million in 2009 . our effective tax rate was 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) in 2010 compared to 43.2% ( 43.2 % ) in 2009 , primarily due to tax planning strategies and federal and state tax credits reducing the effective tax rate , partially offset by a valuation allowance recorded against our foreign net operating loss carryforward . segment results of operations year ended december 31 , 2011 compared to year ended december 31 , 2010 net revenues by geographic region are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>north america</td><td>$ 1383346</td><td>$ 997816</td><td>$ 385530</td><td>38.6% ( 38.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other foreign countries</td><td>89338</td><td>66111</td><td>23227</td><td>35.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 1472684</td><td>$ 1063927</td><td>$ 408757</td><td>38.4% ( 38.4 % )</td></tr></table> net revenues in our north american operating segment increased $ 385.5 million to $ 1383.3 million in 2011 from $ 997.8 million in 2010 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations . net revenues in other foreign countries increased by $ 23.2 million to $ 89.3 million in 2011 from $ 66.1 million in 2010 primarily due to footwear shipments to our dome licensee , as well as unit sales growth to our distributors in our latin american operating segment. .\nQuestion: what is the increase in provision for income taxes?\nAnswer: 4.8\nQuestion: what was the provision for income taxes in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "35.6" } ]
CONVFINQA10984	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005************************************************************* $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*********************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*********************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*********************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*********************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ****************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments********************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td><td>aggregate debt maturities</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 13.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>11.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>8.9</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>8.0</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>7.2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1.1</td><td>267.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total obligations and commitments</td><td>$ 49.8</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*********************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*********************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*********************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*********************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*********************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ****************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************ $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. .\nQuestion: what is the total expense for all operating leases in 2004?\nAnswer: 14.0\nQuestion: what about in 2003?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12.3" } ]
CONVFINQA8884	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\neconomic useful life is the duration of time an asset is expected to be productively employed by us , which may be less than its physical life . assumptions on the following factors , among others , affect the determination of estimated economic useful life : wear and tear , obsolescence , technical standards , contract life , market demand , competitive position , raw material availability , and geographic location . the estimated economic useful life of an asset is monitored to determine its appropriateness , especially in light of changed business circumstances . for example , changes in technology , changes in the estimated future demand for products , or excessive wear and tear may result in a shorter estimated useful life than originally anticipated . in these cases , we would depreciate the remaining net book value over the new estimated remaining life , thereby increasing depreciation expense per year on a prospective basis . likewise , if the estimated useful life is increased , the adjustment to the useful life decreases depreciation expense per year on a prospective basis . we have numerous long-term customer supply contracts , particularly in the gases on-site business within the tonnage gases segment . these contracts principally have initial contract terms of 15 to 20 years . there are also long-term customer supply contracts associated with the tonnage gases business within the electronics and performance materials segment . these contracts principally have initial terms of 10 to 15 years . additionally , we have several customer supply contracts within the equipment and energy segment with contract terms that are primarily five to 10 years . the depreciable lives of assets within this segment can be extended to 20 years for certain redeployable assets . depreciable lives of the production assets related to long-term contracts are matched to the contract lives . extensions to the contract term of supply frequently occur prior to the expiration of the initial term . as contract terms are extended , the depreciable life of the remaining net book value of the production assets is adjusted to match the new contract term , as long as it does not exceed the physical life of the asset . the depreciable lives of production facilities within the merchant gases segment are principally 15 years . customer contracts associated with products produced at these types of facilities typically have a much shorter term . the depreciable lives of production facilities within the electronics and performance materials segment , where there is not an associated long-term supply agreement , range from 10 to 15 years . these depreciable lives have been determined based on historical experience combined with judgment on future assumptions such as technological advances , potential obsolescence , competitors 2019 actions , etc . management monitors its assumptions and may potentially need to adjust depreciable life as circumstances change . a change in the depreciable life by one year for production facilities within the merchant gases and electronics and performance materials segments for which there is not an associated long-term customer supply agreement would impact annual depreciation expense as summarized below : decrease life by 1 year increase life by 1 year . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>decrease lifeby 1 year</td><td>increase life by 1 year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>merchant gases</td><td>$ 32</td><td>$ -24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>electronics and performance materials</td><td>$ 12</td><td>$ -11 ( 11 )</td></tr></table> impairment of assets plant and equipment plant and equipment held for use is grouped for impairment testing at the lowest level for which there is identifiable cash flows . impairment testing of the asset group occurs whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable . such circumstances would include a significant decrease in the market value of a long-lived asset grouping , a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset grouping is being used or in its physical condition , a history of operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the asset grouping , or changes in the expected useful life of the long-lived assets . if such circumstances are determined to exist , an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by that asset group is compared to the carrying value to determine whether impairment exists . if an asset group is determined to be impaired , the loss is measured based on the difference between the asset group 2019s fair value and its carrying value . an estimate of the asset group 2019s fair value is based on the discounted value of its estimated cash flows . assets to be disposed of by sale are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell . the assumptions underlying cash flow projections represent management 2019s best estimates at the time of the impairment review . factors that management must estimate include industry and market conditions , sales volume and prices , costs to produce , inflation , etc . changes in key assumptions or actual conditions that differ from estimates could result in an impairment charge . we use reasonable and supportable assumptions when performing .\nQuestion: considering the 15 years worth of contract terms in which the depreciation for the merchant gases segment will occur, what will be its total expense?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "360.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3738	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvaluation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are public investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund manager . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) . fixed income securities categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g . interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . private equity funds , real estate funds , hedge funds , and fixed income securities categorized as level 3 are valued based on valuation models that include significant unobservable inputs and cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners , while hedge funds are valued by independent administrators . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners or independent administrators use both the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . commodities categorized as level 1 are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . commodities categorized as level 2 represent shares in a commingled commodity fund valued using the nav , which is corroborated by observable market data . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 3.6 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.5 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2013 . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 235 million related to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we expect no required contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2013 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018 - 2022</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 1900</td><td>$ 1970</td><td>$ 2050</td><td>$ 2130</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 12880</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>200</td><td>210</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>1080</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 380 million in 2012 , $ 378 million in 2011 , and $ 379 million in 2010 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 48.6 million and 52.1 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011. .\nQuestion: what was the number of shares from the common stock held by defined contribution plans in 2012, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "48.6" } ]
CONVFINQA7821	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstate street corporation \| 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 172</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 227</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>132</td><td>151</td><td>153</td><td>171</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>136</td><td>156</td><td>154</td><td>189</td><td>230</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>151</td><td>195</td><td>231</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of state street in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "148.0" } ]
CONVFINQA389	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively . leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no . 13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) . from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million . as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 53.8</td><td>$ 55.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>31.7</td><td>36.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-38.5 ( 38.5 )</td><td>-43.9 ( 43.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-43.0 ( 43.0 )</td><td>-43.3 ( 43.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 4.0</td><td>$ 3.8</td></tr></table> 9 . mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company . for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k . reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: .\nQuestion: what were the sublease revenues in 2008?\nAnswer: 7.1\nQuestion: and what were they in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7.7" } ]
CONVFINQA6669	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nas of december 31 , 2006 , we also leased an office and laboratory facility in connecticut , additional office , distribution and storage facilities in san diego , and four foreign facilities located in japan , singapore , china and the netherlands under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times through july 2011 . these leases contain renewal options ranging from one to five years . as of december 31 , 2006 , our contractual obligations were ( in thousands ) : contractual obligation total less than 1 year 1 2013 3 years 1 2013 5 years more than 5 years . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligation</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period less than 1 year</td><td>payments due by period 1 2013 3 years</td><td>payments due by period 1 2013 5 years</td><td>payments due by period more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating leases</td><td>$ 37899</td><td>$ 5320</td><td>$ 10410</td><td>$ 9371</td><td>$ 12798</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 37899</td><td>$ 5320</td><td>$ 10410</td><td>$ 9371</td><td>$ 12798</td></tr></table> the above table does not include orders for goods and services entered into in the normal course of business that are not enforceable or legally binding . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk . interest rate sensitivity our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio . the fair market value of fixed rate securities may be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates while income earned on floating rate securities may decline as a result of decreases in interest rates . under our current policies , we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . we attempt to ensure the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk , market risk and reinvestment risk . we mitigate default risk by investing in investment grade securities . we have historically maintained a relatively short average maturity for our investment portfolio , and we believe a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest sensitive financial instruments . foreign currency exchange risk although most of our revenue is realized in u.s . dollars , some portions of our revenue are realized in foreign currencies . as a result , our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets . the functional currencies of our subsidiaries are their respective local currencies . accordingly , the accounts of these operations are translated from the local currency to the u.s . dollar using the current exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date for the balance sheet accounts , and using the average exchange rate during the period for revenue and expense accounts . the effects of translation are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders 2019 equity. .\nQuestion: what is the total of operating leases due in less than one year?\nAnswer: 5320.0\nQuestion: and what is the total of all operating leases?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "37899.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1578	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-12.0 ( 12.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-7.4 ( 7.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 959.2</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to \"hurricane rita and hurricane katrina\" and \"state and local rate regulation\" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see \"state and local rate regulation\" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .\nQuestion: what was the net revenue in 2008?\nAnswer: 959.2\nQuestion: and what was it in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "991.1" } ]
CONVFINQA1419	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother taxes decreased in 2001 because its utility operations in virginia became subject to state income taxes in lieu of gross receipts taxes effective january 2001 . in addition , dominion recognized higher effective rates for foreign earnings and higher pretax income in relation to non-conventional fuel tax credits realized . dominion energy 2002 2001 2000 ( millions , except per share amounts ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions except pershare amounts )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenue</td><td>$ 5940</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 4894</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>4520</td><td>4749</td><td>3939</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income contribution</td><td>770</td><td>723</td><td>489</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>earnings per share contribution</td><td>$ 2.72</td><td>$ 2.86</td><td>$ 2.07</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity supplied* ( million mwhrs )</td><td>101</td><td>95</td><td>83</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gas transmission throughput ( bcf )</td><td>597</td><td>553</td><td>567</td></tr></table> * amounts presented are for electricity supplied by utility and merchant generation operations . operating results 2014 2002 dominion energy contributed $ 2.72 per diluted share on net income of $ 770 million for 2002 , a net income increase of $ 47 million and an earnings per share decrease of $ 0.14 over 2001 . net income for 2002 reflected lower operating revenue ( $ 204 million ) , operating expenses ( $ 229 million ) and other income ( $ 27 million ) . interest expense and income taxes , which are discussed on a consolidated basis , decreased $ 50 million over 2001 . the earnings per share decrease reflected share dilution . regulated electric sales revenue increased $ 179 million . favorable weather conditions , reflecting increased cooling and heating degree-days , as well as customer growth , are estimated to have contributed $ 133 million and $ 41 million , respectively . fuel rate recoveries increased approximately $ 65 million for 2002 . these recoveries are generally offset by increases in elec- tric fuel expense and do not materially affect income . partially offsetting these increases was a net decrease of $ 60 million due to other factors not separately measurable , such as the impact of economic conditions on customer usage , as well as variations in seasonal rate premiums and discounts . nonregulated electric sales revenue increased $ 9 million . sales revenue from dominion 2019s merchant generation fleet decreased $ 21 million , reflecting a $ 201 million decline due to lower prices partially offset by sales from assets acquired and constructed in 2002 and the inclusion of millstone operations for all of 2002 . revenue from the wholesale marketing of utility generation decreased $ 74 million . due to the higher demand of utility service territory customers during 2002 , less production from utility plant generation was available for profitable sale in the wholesale market . revenue from retail energy sales increased $ 71 million , reflecting primarily customer growth over the prior year . net revenue from dominion 2019s electric trading activities increased $ 33 million , reflecting the effect of favorable price changes on unsettled contracts and higher trading margins . nonregulated gas sales revenue decreased $ 351 million . the decrease included a $ 239 million decrease in sales by dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing opera- tions , reflecting to a large extent declining prices . revenue associated with gas trading operations , net of related cost of sales , decreased $ 112 million . the decrease included $ 70 mil- lion of realized and unrealized losses on the economic hedges of natural gas production by the dominion exploration & pro- duction segment . as described below under selected information 2014 energy trading activities , sales of natural gas by the dominion exploration & production segment at market prices offset these financial losses , resulting in a range of prices contemplated by dominion 2019s overall risk management strategy . the remaining $ 42 million decrease was due to unfavorable price changes on unsettled contracts and lower overall trading margins . those losses were partially offset by contributions from higher trading volumes in gas and oil markets . gas transportation and storage revenue decreased $ 44 million , primarily reflecting lower rates . electric fuel and energy purchases expense increased $ 94 million which included an increase of $ 66 million associated with dominion 2019s energy marketing operations that are not sub- ject to cost-based rate regulation and an increase of $ 28 million associated with utility operations . substantially all of the increase associated with non-regulated energy marketing opera- tions related to higher volumes purchased during the year . for utility operations , energy costs increased $ 66 million for pur- chases subject to rate recovery , partially offset by a $ 38 million decrease in fuel expenses associated with lower wholesale mar- keting of utility plant generation . purchased gas expense decreased $ 245 million associated with dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing oper- ations . this decrease reflected approximately $ 162 million asso- ciated with declining prices and $ 83 million associated with lower purchased volumes . liquids , pipeline capacity and other purchases decreased $ 64 million , primarily reflecting comparably lower levels of rate recoveries of certain costs of transmission operations in the cur- rent year period . the difference between actual expenses and amounts recovered in the period are deferred pending future rate adjustments . other operations and maintenance expense decreased $ 14 million , primarily reflecting an $ 18 million decrease in outage costs due to fewer generation unit outages in the current year . depreciation expense decreased $ 11 million , reflecting decreases in depreciation associated with changes in the esti- mated useful lives of certain electric generation property , par- tially offset by increased depreciation associated with state line and millstone operations . other income decreased $ 27 million , including a $ 14 mil- lion decrease in net realized investment gains in the millstone 37d o m i n i o n 2019 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t .\nQuestion: what was the electricity supplied (in million mwhrs) in the year of 2002?\nAnswer: 101.0\nQuestion: and what was that of 2001?\nAnswer: 95.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change rate in the electricity supplied from 2001 to 2002?\nAnswer: 1.06316\nQuestion: what was the electricity supplied (in million mwhrs) in the year of 2002?\nAnswer: 101.0\nQuestion: given that same growth pattern from 2002, what would be the electricity supplied (in million mwhrs) in the year of 2003?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "107.37895" } ]
CONVFINQA11068	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements expected long-term return on plan assets 2013 the expected long-term return on plan assets assumption for our u.s . funded plan is determined based on an asset rate-of-return modeling tool developed by a third-party investment group which utilizes underlying assumptions based on actual returns by asset category and inflation and takes into account our u.s . pension plan 2019s asset allocation . to determine the expected long-term return on plan assets assumption for our international plans , we consider the current level of expected returns on risk-free investments ( primarily government bonds ) , the historical levels of the risk premiums associated with the other applicable asset categories and the expectations for future returns of each asset class . the expected return for each asset category is then weighted based on the actual asset allocation to develop the overall expected long-term return on plan assets assumption . assumed weighted average health care cost trend rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>initial health care trend rate</td><td>n/a</td><td>8.00% ( 8.00 % )</td><td>8.25% ( 8.25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>ultimate trend rate</td><td>n/a</td><td>4.70% ( 4.70 % )</td><td>4.50% ( 4.50 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>year ultimate trend rate is reached</td><td>n/a</td><td>2025</td><td>2025</td></tr></table> n/a all retiree medical subsidies are frozen as of january 1 , 2019 . employer provided subsidies for post-65 retiree health care coverage were frozen effective january 1 , 2017 at january 1 , 2016 established amount levels . company contributions are funded to a health reimbursement account on the retiree 2019s behalf to subsidize the retiree 2019s cost of obtaining health care benefits through a private exchange ( the 201cpost-65 retiree health benefits 201d ) . therefore , a 1% ( 1 % ) change in health care cost trend rates would not have a material impact on either the service and interest cost components and the postretirement benefit obligations . in the fourth quarter of 2018 , we terminated the post-65 retiree health benefits effective as of december 31 , 2020 . the post-65 retiree health benefits will no longer be provided after that date . in addition , the pre-65 retiree medical coverage subsidy has been frozen as of january 1 , 2019 , and the ability for retirees to opt in and out of this coverage , as well as pre-65 retiree dental and vision coverage , has also been eliminated . retirees must enroll in connection with retirement for such coverage , or they lose eligibility . these plan changes reduced our retiree medical benefit obligation by approximately $ 99 million . plan investment policies and strategies 2013 the investment policies for our u.s . and international pension plan assets reflect the funded status of the plans and expectations regarding our future ability to make further contributions . long-term investment goals are to : ( 1 ) manage the assets in accordance with applicable legal requirements ; ( 2 ) produce investment returns which meet or exceed the rates of return achievable in the capital markets while maintaining the risk parameters set by the plan's investment committees and protecting the assets from any erosion of purchasing power ; and ( 3 ) position the portfolios with a long-term risk/ return orientation . investment performance and risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment meetings and periodic asset and liability studies . u.s . plan 2013 the plan 2019s current targeted asset allocation is comprised of 55% ( 55 % ) equity securities and 45% ( 45 % ) other fixed income securities . over time , as the plan 2019s funded ratio ( as defined by the investment policy ) improves , in order to reduce volatility in returns and to better match the plan 2019s liabilities , the allocation to equity securities will decrease while the amount allocated to fixed income securities will increase . the plan's assets are managed by a third-party investment manager . international plan 2013 our international plan's target asset allocation is comprised of 55% ( 55 % ) equity securities and 45% ( 45 % ) fixed income securities . the plan assets are invested in ten separate portfolios , mainly pooled fund vehicles , managed by several professional investment managers whose performance is measured independently by a third-party asset servicing consulting fair value measurements 2013 plan assets are measured at fair value . the following provides a description of the valuation techniques employed for each major plan asset class at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash and cash equivalents are valued using a market approach and are considered level 1 . equity securities 2013 investments in common stock are valued using a market approach at the closing price reported in an active market and are therefore considered level 1 . private equity investments include interests in limited partnerships which are valued based on the sum of the estimated fair values of the investments held by each partnership , determined using a combination of market , income and cost approaches , plus working capital , adjusted for liabilities , currency translation and estimated performance incentives . these private equity investments are considered level 3 . investments in pooled funds are valued using a market approach , these various funds consist of equity with underlying investments held in u.s . and non-u.s . securities . the pooled funds are benchmarked against a relative public index and are considered level 2. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate trend rate in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.033" } ]
CONVFINQA411	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntransfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>2140511</td><td>$ 20.54</td><td>2139507</td><td>$ 227368014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1126378</td><td>$ 22.95</td><td>1124601</td><td>$ 201557625</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1881992</td><td>$ 22.97</td><td>1872650</td><td>$ 158553178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5148881</td><td>$ 21.96</td><td>5136758</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .\nQuestion: what was the proportion of total number of shares purchased in december to the total amount purchased?\nAnswer: 0.36551\nQuestion: and converted to a percentage value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "36.55148" } ]
CONVFINQA4303	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n56 / 57 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures in june 2005 , we issued $ 100.0 a0million of trust preferred securities , which are reflected on the balance sheet as junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures . the proceeds were used to repay our revolving credit facility . the $ 100.0 a0million of junior subordi- nate deferrable interest debentures have a 30-year term ending july 2035 . they bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) for the first 10 years ending july 2015 . thereafter , the rate will float at three month libor plus 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) . the securities are redeemable at par . restrictive covenants the terms of the 2011 revolving credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends ( as discussed below ) , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and the disposition of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios including our minimum tangible net worth , a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that we will not during any time when we are in default , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable us to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2011 and 2010 , we were in compli- ance with all such covenants . market rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our floating rate borrowing arrangements . we use interest rate deriv- ative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . a a0hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 , would increase our annual interest cost by approximately $ 12.3 a0million and $ 11.0 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by approximately $ 4.8 a0million and $ 6.7 a0million , respectively . we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings . approximately $ 4.8 a0billion of our long- term debt bore interest a0at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instru- ments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . the interest rate on our variable rate debt and joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2011 ranged from libor plus 150 a0basis points to libor plus 350 a0basis points . contractual obligations combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , our 2011 revolving credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as- of-right extension options , estimated interest expense ( based on weighted average interest rates for the quarter ) , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages</td><td>$ 52443</td><td>$ 568649</td><td>$ 647776</td><td>$ 270382</td><td>$ 556400</td><td>$ 2278190</td><td>$ 4373840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>119423</td><td>2014</td><td>98578</td><td>657</td><td>274804</td><td>777194</td><td>1270656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>capital lease</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1592</td><td>1707</td><td>42351</td><td>50315</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ground leases</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33533</td><td>615450</td><td>782699</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>312672</td><td>309280</td><td>269286</td><td>244709</td><td>212328</td><td>470359</td><td>1818634</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>176457</td><td>93683</td><td>123983</td><td>102476</td><td>527814</td><td>800102</td><td>1824515</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 695979</td><td>$ 1006596</td><td>$ 1174607</td><td>$ 653245</td><td>$ 1956586</td><td>$ 5083646</td><td>$ 10570659</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the sum of joint venture debt in 2012 and 2013?\nAnswer: 270140.0\nQuestion: what is the value including joint venture debt from 2014?\nAnswer: 394123.0\nQuestion: what is the total including 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "496599.0" } ]
CONVFINQA594	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 4273</td><td>$ 6392</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 136</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .\nQuestion: how much do the mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) on the citigroup 2019s ( msrs ) consolidated balance sheet in 2008 represent in relation to the 2007 ones?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.67857" } ]
CONVFINQA5116	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii , item 8 schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>1178</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>14</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>18</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what is the balance of shares outstanding at the end of 2009?\nAnswer: 1195.0\nQuestion: what about 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1194.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2332	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 . redeemable noncontrolling interests - continued redeemable noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets are recorded at the greater of their carrying amount or redemption value at the end of each reporting period . changes in the value from period to period are charged to 201cadditional capital 201d in our consolidated statements of changes in equity . below is a table summarizing the activity of redeemable noncontrolling interests . ( amounts in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 1177978</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>25120</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>distributions</td><td>-42451 ( 42451 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>conversion of class a units into common shares at redemption value</td><td>-90955 ( 90955 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjustment to carry redeemable class a units at redemption value</td><td>167049</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net</td><td>14887</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>$ 1251628</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net income</td><td>55228</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>distributions</td><td>-53515 ( 53515 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>conversion of class a units into common shares at redemption value</td><td>-126764 ( 126764 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>adjustment to carry redeemable class a units at redemption value</td><td>191826</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>redemption of series d-12 redeemable units</td><td>-13000 ( 13000 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>other net</td><td>22571</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 1327974</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the aggregate redemption value of redeemable class a units was $ 1066974000 and $ 971628000 , respectively . redeemable noncontrolling interests exclude our series g convertible preferred units and series d-13 cumulative redeemable preferred units , as they are accounted for as liabilities in accordance with asc 480 , distinguishing liabilities and equity , because of their possible settlement by issuing a variable number of vornado common shares . accordingly the fair value of these units is included as a component of 201cother liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets and aggregated $ 55097000 and $ 60271000 as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the balance of redeemable non-controlling interests as of 12/31/09?\nAnswer: 1251628.0\nQuestion: and as of 12/31/08?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1177978.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4402	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhumana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) not be estimated based on observable market prices , and as such , unobservable inputs were used . for auction rate securities , valuation methodologies include consideration of the quality of the sector and issuer , underlying collateral , underlying final maturity dates , and liquidity . recently issued accounting pronouncements there are no recently issued accounting standards that apply to us or that will have a material impact on our results of operations , financial condition , or cash flows . 3 . acquisitions on december 21 , 2012 , we acquired metropolitan health networks , inc. , or metropolitan , a medical services organization , or mso , that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage beneficiaries and medicaid recipients , primarily in florida . we paid $ 11.25 per share in cash to acquire all of the outstanding shares of metropolitan and repaid all outstanding debt of metropolitan for a transaction value of $ 851 million , plus transaction expenses . the preliminary fair values of metropolitan 2019s assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition are summarized as follows : metropolitan ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>metropolitan ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 49</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables net</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>569</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other long-term assets</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>972</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other long-term liabilities</td><td>-99 ( 99 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>-121 ( 121 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 851</td></tr></table> the goodwill was assigned to the health and well-being services segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . the other intangible assets , which primarily consist of customer contracts and trade names , have a weighted average useful life of 8.4 years . on october 29 , 2012 , we acquired a noncontrolling equity interest in mcci holdings , llc , or mcci , a privately held mso headquartered in miami , florida that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage and medicaid beneficiaries primarily in florida and texas . the metropolitan and mcci transactions are expected to provide us with components of a successful integrated care delivery model that has demonstrated scalability to new markets . a substantial portion of the revenues for both metropolitan and mcci are derived from services provided to humana medicare advantage members under capitation contracts with our health plans . in addition , metropolitan and mcci provide services to medicare advantage and medicaid members under capitation contracts with third party health plans . under these capitation agreements with humana and third party health plans , metropolitan and mcci assume financial risk associated with these medicare advantage and medicaid members. .\nQuestion: what is the value of cash and cash equivalents?\nAnswer: 49.0\nQuestion: what is the value of net receivables?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "28.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10108	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.89</td><td>$ 139.55</td><td>$ 124.88</td><td>$ 127.08</td><td>$ 122.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 128.68</td><td>$ 142.68</td><td>$ 149.69</td><td>$ 173.33</td><td>$ 182.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 131.84</td><td>$ 168.39</td><td>$ 188.00</td><td>$ 206.46</td><td>$ 209.40</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .\nQuestion: what was the value of ups in 2003?\nAnswer: 119.89\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in its value considering the amount originally invested in it in 2002?\nAnswer: 19.89\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to this original amount invested?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.1989" } ]
CONVFINQA1639	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .\nQuestion: what were north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012?\nAnswer: 11.6\nQuestion: what were they in 2011?\nAnswer: 8.6\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 3.0\nQuestion: what was the 2011 value?\nAnswer: 8.6\nQuestion: what is the net change over that?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.34884" } ]
CONVFINQA9368	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nl iquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company's cash and cash equivalents decreased to $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 from $ 88617 at june 30 , 2007 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : year ended june 30 cash provided by operations increased $ 6754 to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 as compared to $ 174247 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2007 . this increase is primarily attributable to an increase in expenses that do not have a corresponding cash outflow , such as depreciation and amortization , as a percentage of total net income . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . during fiscal 2007 , payments for acquisitions totaled $ 34006 , plus $ 5301 paid on earn-outs and other acquisition adjustments . capital expenditures for fiscal 2008 were $ 31105 compared to $ 34202 for fiscal 2007 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2008 was $ 23736 compared to $ 20743 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2007 , net cash used in financing activities included the repurchase of our common stock for $ 98413 and the payment of dividends of $ 21685 . as in the current year , cash used in fiscal 2007 was partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock of $ 29212 , $ 4640 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises and $ 19388 net borrowings on revolving credit facilities . at june 30 , 2008 , the company had negative working capital of $ 11418 ; however , the largest component of current liabilities was deferred revenue of $ 212375 . the cash outlay necessary to provide the services related to these deferred revenues is significantly less than this recorded balance . therefore , we do not anticipate any liquidity problems to result from this condition . u.s . financial markets and many of the largest u.s . financial institutions have recently been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . while we believe it is too early to predict what effect , if any , these developments may have , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collec- tion efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity would be minimized by our access to available lines of credit . 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>year ended june 30 2008 2007</td><td>year ended june 30 2008 2007</td><td>year ended june 30 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 104222</td><td>$ 104681</td><td>$ 89923</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash expenses</td><td>70420</td><td>56348</td><td>52788</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in receivables</td><td>-2913 ( 2913 )</td><td>-28853 ( 28853 )</td><td>30413</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>change in deferred revenue</td><td>5100</td><td>24576</td><td>10561</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>change in other assets and liabilities</td><td>4172</td><td>17495</td><td>-14247 ( 14247 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 181001</td><td>$ 174247</td><td>$ 169438</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the balance of cash and cash equivalents from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: -23052.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: -0.26013\nQuestion: what is the value cash used for stock repurchases during 2007?\nAnswer: 98413.0\nQuestion: what about the value for dividend payments?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "21685.0" } ]
CONVFINQA591	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndiscount rate 2014the assumed discount rate is used to determine the current retirement related benefit plan expense and obligations , and represents the interest rate that is used to determine the present value of future cash flows currently expected to be required to effectively settle a plan 2019s benefit obligations . the discount rate assumption is determined for each plan by constructing a portfolio of high quality bonds with cash flows that match the estimated outflows for future benefit payments to determine a single equivalent discount rate . benefit payments are not only contingent on the terms of a plan , but also on the underlying participant demographics , including current age , and assumed mortality . we use only bonds that are denominated in u.s . dollars , rated aa or better by two of three nationally recognized statistical rating agencies , have a minimum outstanding issue of $ 50 million as of the measurement date , and are not callable , convertible , or index linked . since bond yields are generally unavailable beyond 30 years , we assume those rates will remain constant beyond that point . taking into consideration the factors noted above , our weighted average discount rate for pensions was 5.23% ( 5.23 % ) and 5.84% ( 5.84 % ) , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . our weighted average discount rate for other postretirement benefits was 4.94% ( 4.94 % ) and 5.58% ( 5.58 % ) as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . expected long-term rate of return 2014the expected long-term rate of return on assets is used to calculate net periodic expense , and is based on such factors as historical returns , targeted asset allocations , investment policy , duration , expected future long-term performance of individual asset classes , inflation trends , portfolio volatility , and risk management strategies . while studies are helpful in understanding current trends and performance , the assumption is based more on longer term and prospective views . in order to reflect expected lower future market returns , we have reduced the expected long-term rate of return assumption from 8.50% ( 8.50 % ) , used to record 2011 expense , to 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) for 2012 . the decrease in the expected return on assets assumption is primarily related to lower bond yields and updated return assumptions for equities . unless plan assets and benefit obligations are subject to remeasurement during the year , the expected return on pension assets is based on the fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year . an increase or decrease of 25 basis points in the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return assumptions would have had the following approximate impacts on pensions : ( $ in millions ) increase ( decrease ) in 2012 expense increase ( decrease ) in december 31 , 2011 obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in 2012 expense</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in december 31 2011 obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>25 basis point decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 18</td><td>$ 146</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>25 basis point increase in discount rate</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>25 basis point decrease in expected return on assets</td><td>8</td><td>n.a .</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>25 basis point increase in expected return on assets</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>n.a .</td></tr></table> differences arising from actual experience or changes in assumptions might materially affect retirement related benefit plan obligations and the funded status . actuarial gains and losses arising from differences from actual experience or changes in assumptions are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income . this unrecognized amount is amortized to the extent it exceeds 10% ( 10 % ) of the greater of the plan 2019s benefit obligation or plan assets . the amortization period for actuarial gains and losses is the estimated average remaining service life of the plan participants , which is approximately 10 years . cas expense 2014in addition to providing the methodology for calculating retirement related benefit plan costs , cas also prescribes the method for assigning those costs to specific periods . while the ultimate liability for such costs under fas and cas is similar , the pattern of cost recognition is different . the key drivers of cas pension expense include the funded status and the method used to calculate cas reimbursement for each of our plans as well as our expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption . unlike fas , cas requires the discount rate to be consistent with the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption , which changes infrequently given its long-term nature . as a result , changes in bond or other interest rates generally do not impact cas . in addition , unlike under fas , we can only allocate pension costs for a plan under cas until such plan is fully funded as determined under erisa requirements . other fas and cas considerations 2014we update our estimates of future fas and cas costs at least annually based on factors such as calendar year actual plan asset returns , final census data from the end of the prior year , and other actual and projected experience . a key driver of the difference between fas and cas expense ( and consequently , the fas/cas adjustment ) is the pattern of earnings and expense recognition for gains and losses that arise when our asset and liability experiences differ from our assumptions under each set of requirements . under fas , our net gains and losses exceeding the 10% ( 10 % ) corridor are amortized .\nQuestion: what was the weighted average discount rate for pensions in 2011?\nAnswer: 5.23\nQuestion: what was the rate in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5.84" } ]
CONVFINQA193	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nadobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 . other assets other assets as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>$ 84313</td><td>$ 90643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investments</td><td>63526</td><td>76589</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>security and other deposits</td><td>11692</td><td>16087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>prepaid royalties</td><td>12059</td><td>9026</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred compensation plan assets</td><td>9045</td><td>7560</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>restricted cash</td><td>4650</td><td>7361</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>prepaid land lease</td><td>3209</td><td>3185</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>prepaid rent</td><td>1377</td><td>2658</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other</td><td>1394</td><td>3420</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other assets</td><td>$ 191265</td><td>$ 216529</td></tr></table> acquired rights to use technology purchased during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was $ 6.0 million and $ 100.4 million , respectively . of the cost for fiscal 2008 , an estimated $ 56.4 million was related to future licensing rights and has been capitalized and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives up to fifteen years . of the remaining costs for fiscal 2008 , we estimated that $ 27.2 million was related to historical use of licensing rights which was expensed as cost of sales and the residual of $ 16.8 million for fiscal 2008 was expensed as general and administrative costs . in connection with these licensing arrangements , we have the ability to acquire additional rights to use technology in the future . see note 17 for further information regarding our contractual commitments . in general , acquired rights to use technology are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 15 years . included in investments are our indirect investments through our limited partnership interest in adobe ventures of approximately $ 37.1 million and $ 39.0 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which is consolidated in accordance with the provisions for consolidating variable interest entities . the partnership is controlled by granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures . we are the primary beneficiary of adobe ventures and bear virtually all of the risks and rewards related to our ownership . our investment in adobe ventures does not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . adobe ventures carries its investments in equity securities at estimated fair value and investment gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of income . substantially all of the investments held by adobe ventures at november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 are not publicly traded and , therefore , there is no established market for these securities . in order to determine the fair value of these investments , we use the most recent round of financing involving new non-strategic investors or estimates of current market value made by granite ventures . it is our policy to evaluate the fair value of these investments held by adobe ventures , as well as our direct investments , on a regular basis . this evaluation includes , but is not limited to , reviewing each company 2019s cash position , financing needs , earnings and revenue outlook , operational performance , management and ownership changes and competition . in the case of privately-held companies , this evaluation is based on information that we request from these companies . this information is not subject to the same disclosure regulations as u.s . publicly traded companies and as such , the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and the accuracy of the data received from these companies . see note 4 for further information regarding adobe ventures . also included in investments are our direct investments in privately-held companies of approximately $ 26.4 million and $ 37.6 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which are accounted for based on the cost method . we assess these investments for impairment in value as circumstances dictate . see note 4 for further information regarding our cost method investments . we entered into a purchase and sale agreement , effective may 12 , 2008 , for the acquisition of real property located in waltham , massachusetts . we purchased the property upon completion of construction of an office building shell and core , parking structure , and site improvements . the purchase price for the property was $ 44.7 million and closed on june 16 , 2009 . we made an initial deposit of $ 7.0 million which was included in security and other deposits as of november 28 , 2008 and the remaining balance was paid at closing . this deposit was held in escrow until closing and then applied to the purchase price. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the balance of other assets from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: -25264.0\nQuestion: what is the balance of other assets in 2008?\nAnswer: 216529.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.11668" } ]
CONVFINQA8231	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncomparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 108</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 201</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 86</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 98</td><td>$ 114</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 139</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 210</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is \"furnished\" and shall not be deemed to be \"soliciting material\" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed \"filed\" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of lkq corporation price between 2007 and 2012?\nAnswer: 101.0\nQuestion: what was the price of lkq corporation in 2007?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\nAnswer: 1.01\nQuestion: what was the change in value of the peer group between 2007 and 2012?\nAnswer: 110.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.1" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.