id
stringlengths 10
14
| entries
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|---|
CONVFINQA2867
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2004 and 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 13.12</td><td>$ 9.89</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>16.00</td><td>11.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>15.85</td><td>13.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>18.75</td><td>15.19</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2003</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 5.94</td><td>$ 3.55</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>9.90</td><td>5.41</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>11.74</td><td>8.73</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>12.00</td><td>9.59</td></tr></table> on march 18 , 2005 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 18.79 per share as reported on the as of march 18 , 2005 , we had 230604932 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 743 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . our charter prohibits the future issuance of shares of class b common stock . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . our charter permits the issuance of shares of class c common stock in the future . the information under 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 201d from the definitive proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference into item 12 of this annual report . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 93 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior notes due 2009 , our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 , and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our borrower subsidiaries are generally prohibited under the terms of the credit facility , subject to certain exceptions , from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests , except that , if no default exists or would be created thereby under the credit facility , our borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the credit facility within certain specified amounts and , in addition , may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in respect of our outstanding indebtedness and permitted future indebtedness . the indentures governing the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes due 2011 of american towers , inc . ( ati ) , our principal operating subsidiary , prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain .\nQuestion: what was the share high price for the quarter ended june 30?\nAnswer: 16.0\nQuestion: what was the low price for quarter?\nAnswer: 11.13\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "4.87"
}
] |
CONVFINQA617
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ns c h e d u l e i v ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31 2008 2007 and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>direct amount</td><td>ceded to other companies</td><td>assumed from other companies</td><td>net amount</td><td>percentage of amount assumed to net</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 16087</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 3260</td><td>$ 13203</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 14673</td><td>$ 5834</td><td>$ 3458</td><td>$ 12297</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 13562</td><td>$ 5198</td><td>$ 3461</td><td>$ 11825</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net amount in 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "13203.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4474
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were $ 5.28 , $ 3.79 and $ 4.36 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>28.6% ( 28.6 % )</td><td>28.7% ( 28.7 % )</td><td>27.3% ( 27.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.3</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected forfeiture rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr></table> republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .\nQuestion: what is the expected volatility in 2009?\nAnswer: 28.7\nQuestion: what about in 2008?\nAnswer: 27.3\nQuestion: net change from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: 1.4\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.05128\nQuestion: what about the net change in the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2009 to 20010?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.49"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10744
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\na valuation allowance has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to the impairment of investments . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2011 and 2010 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : beginning balance gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions settlements with taxing authorities lapse of statute of limitations foreign exchange gains and losses ending balance $ 156925 11901 ( 4154 ) 32420 ( 29101 ) ( 3825 ) $ 163607 $ 218040 ( 7104 ) 15108 ( 70484 ) ( 7896 ) $ 156925 as of december 2 , 2011 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 12.3 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2008 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examination . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in august 2011 , a canadian income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2008 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was approximately $ 35 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we reclassified approximately $ 17 million to short-term income taxes payable and decreased deferred tax assets by approximately $ 18 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . the $ 17 million balance in short-term income taxes payable is partially secured by a letter of credit and is expected to be paid by the first quarter of fiscal 2012 . in october 2010 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2007 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 59 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we paid $ 20 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . a net income statement tax benefit in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 of $ 39 million resulted . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . the company believes that before the end of fiscal 2012 , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 40 million . these amounts would decrease income tax expense under current gaap related to income taxes . note 11 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions of approximately 700 full-time positions worldwide and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 78.6 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the position eliminated . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 156925</td><td>$ 218040</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>11901</td><td>9580</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>-4154 ( 4154 )</td><td>-7104 ( 7104 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>32420</td><td>15108</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-29101 ( 29101 )</td><td>-70484 ( 70484 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-3825 ( 3825 )</td><td>-7896 ( 7896 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-559 ( 559 )</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 163607</td><td>$ 156925</td></tr></table> a valuation allowance has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to the impairment of investments . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2011 and 2010 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : beginning balance gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions settlements with taxing authorities lapse of statute of limitations foreign exchange gains and losses ending balance $ 156925 11901 ( 4154 ) 32420 ( 29101 ) ( 3825 ) $ 163607 $ 218040 ( 7104 ) 15108 ( 70484 ) ( 7896 ) $ 156925 as of december 2 , 2011 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 12.3 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2008 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examination . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in august 2011 , a canadian income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2008 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was approximately $ 35 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we reclassified approximately $ 17 million to short-term income taxes payable and decreased deferred tax assets by approximately $ 18 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . the $ 17 million balance in short-term income taxes payable is partially secured by a letter of credit and is expected to be paid by the first quarter of fiscal 2012 . in october 2010 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2007 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 59 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we paid $ 20 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . a net income statement tax benefit in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 of $ 39 million resulted . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . the company believes that before the end of fiscal 2012 , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 40 million . these amounts would decrease income tax expense under current gaap related to income taxes . note 11 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions of approximately 700 full-time positions worldwide and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 78.6 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the position eliminated . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during the year of 2010?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-61115.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2678
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years . stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives . the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria . annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached . a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td><td>2728290</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>192563</td><td>92729</td><td>185333</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-3267 ( 3267 )</td><td>-200284 ( 200284 )</td><td>-1167 ( 1167 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>2994197</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vested during the year</td><td>21074</td><td>408800</td><td>66299</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>compensation expense recorded</td><td>$ 6713155</td><td>$ 6930381</td><td>$ 17365401</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year</td><td>$ 17386949</td><td>$ 7023942</td><td>$ 21768084</td></tr></table> weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options . we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 . a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price . the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years . during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan . the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year . in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) . the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively . substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .\nQuestion: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?\nAnswer: 27.3\nQuestion: and for 2012?\nAnswer: 12.6\nQuestion: combined, what was the total value in these years?\nAnswer: 39.9\nQuestion: and the specific value for 2011?\nAnswer: 8.5\nQuestion: so what was the total amount for all three years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "48.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA125
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrepublic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the letters of credit use $ 909.4 million and $ 950.2 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , of availability under our credit facilities . surety bonds expire on various dates through 2026 . these financial instruments are issued in the normal course of business and are not debt . because we currently have no liability for this financial assurance , it is not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets . however , we have recorded capping , closure and post-closure obligations and self-insurance reserves as they are incurred . the underlying financial assurance obligations , in excess of those already reflected in our consolidated balance sheets , would be recorded if it is probable that we would be unable to fulfill our related obligations . we do not expect this to occur . our restricted cash and marketable securities deposits include , among other things , restricted cash and marketable securities held for capital expenditures under certain debt facilities , and restricted cash and marketable securities pledged to regulatory agencies and governmental entities as financial guarantees of our performance related to our final capping , closure and post-closure obligations at our landfills . the following table summarizes our restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>financing proceeds</td><td>$ 24.7</td><td>$ 22.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capping closure and post-closure obligations</td><td>54.8</td><td>54.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>self-insurance</td><td>81.3</td><td>75.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>3.4</td><td>37.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total restricted cash and marketable securities</td><td>$ 164.2</td><td>$ 189.6</td></tr></table> we own a 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) interest in a company that , among other activities , issues financial surety bonds to secure capping , closure and post-closure obligations for companies operating in the solid waste industry . we account for this investment under the cost method of accounting . there have been no identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the recoverability of the investment . this investee company and the parent company of the investee had written surety bonds for us relating primarily to our landfill operations for capping , closure and post-closure , of which $ 1152.1 million was outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 . our reimbursement obligations under these bonds are secured by an indemnity agreement with the investee and letters of credit totaling $ 23.4 million and $ 45.0 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 . off-balance sheet arrangements we have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations , other than operating leases and the financial assurances discussed above , which are not classified as debt . we have no transactions or obligations with related parties that are not disclosed , consolidated into or reflected in our reported financial position or results of operations . we have not guaranteed any third-party debt . guarantees we enter into contracts in the normal course of business that include indemnification clauses . indemnifications relating to known liabilities are recorded in the consolidated financial statements based on our best estimate of required future payments . certain of these indemnifications relate to contingent events or occurrences , such as the imposition of additional taxes due to a change in the tax law or adverse interpretation of the tax law , and indemnifications made in divestiture agreements where we indemnify the buyer for liabilities that relate to our activities prior to the divestiture and that may become known in the future . we do not believe that these contingent obligations will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .\nQuestion: what was the total restricted cash and marketable securities in 2012?\nAnswer: 164.2\nQuestion: and in 2011?\nAnswer: 189.6\nQuestion: and the difference between these two years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-25.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA143
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncredit facilities . as such , our foreign cash and cash equivalents are not expected to be a key source of liquidity to our domestic operations . at september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately $ 2.9 billion of availability under our committed credit facilities , primarily under our revolving credit facility , the majority of which matures on july 1 , 2022 . this liquidity may be used to provide for ongoing working capital needs and for other general corporate purposes , including acquisitions , dividends and stock repurchases . certain restrictive covenants govern our maximum availability under the credit facilities . we test and report our compliance with these covenants as required and we were in compliance with all of these covenants at september 30 , 2019 . at september 30 , 2019 , we had $ 129.8 million of outstanding letters of credit not drawn cash and cash equivalents were $ 151.6 million at september 30 , 2019 and $ 636.8 million at september 30 , 2018 . we used a significant portion of the cash and cash equivalents on hand at september 30 , 2018 in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition . primarily all of the cash and cash equivalents at september 30 , 2019 were held outside of the u.s . at september 30 , 2019 , total debt was $ 10063.4 million , $ 561.1 million of which was current . at september 30 , 2018 , total debt was $ 6415.2 million , $ 740.7 million of which was current . the increase in debt was primarily related to the kapstone acquisition . cash flow activity . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2019</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2310.2</td><td>$ 1931.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>$ -4579.6 ( 4579.6 )</td><td>$ -815.1 ( 815.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>$ 1780.2</td><td>$ -755.1 ( 755.1 )</td></tr></table> net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2019 increased $ 379.0 million from fiscal 2018 primarily due to higher cash earnings and a $ 340.3 million net decrease in the use of working capital compared to the prior year . as a result of the retrospective adoption of asu 2016-15 and asu 2016-18 ( each as hereinafter defined ) as discussed in 201cnote 1 . description of business and summary of significant accounting policies 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements , net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2018 was reduced by $ 489.7 million and cash provided by investing activities increased $ 483.8 million , primarily for the change in classification of proceeds received for beneficial interests obtained for transferring trade receivables in securitization transactions . net cash used for investing activities of $ 4579.6 million in fiscal 2019 consisted primarily of $ 3374.2 million for cash paid for the purchase of businesses , net of cash acquired ( excluding the assumption of debt ) , primarily related to the kapstone acquisition , and $ 1369.1 million for capital expenditures that were partially offset by $ 119.1 million of proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment primarily related to the sale of our atlanta beverage facility , $ 33.2 million of proceeds from corporate owned life insurance benefits and $ 25.5 million of proceeds from property , plant and equipment insurance proceeds related to the panama city , fl mill . net cash used for investing activities of $ 815.1 million in fiscal 2018 consisted primarily of $ 999.9 million for capital expenditures , $ 239.9 million for cash paid for the purchase of businesses , net of cash acquired primarily related to the plymouth acquisition and the schl fcter acquisition , and $ 108.0 million for an investment in grupo gondi . these investments were partially offset by $ 461.6 million of cash receipts on sold trade receivables as a result of the adoption of asu 2016-15 , $ 24.0 million of proceeds from the sale of certain affiliates as well as our solid waste management brokerage services business and $ 23.3 million of proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment . in fiscal 2019 , net cash provided by financing activities of $ 1780.2 million consisted primarily of a net increase in debt of $ 2314.6 million , primarily related to the kapstone acquisition and partially offset by cash dividends paid to stockholders of $ 467.9 million and purchases of common stock of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , net cash used for financing activities of $ 755.1 million consisted primarily of cash dividends paid to stockholders of $ 440.9 million and purchases of common stock of $ 195.1 million and net repayments of debt of $ 120.1 million. .\nQuestion: what was the sum of net cash provided by operating activities and used for investing in 2019?\nAnswer: -2269.4\nQuestion: was is the sum including cash from financing activities?\nAnswer: 1780.2\nQuestion: what is the total sum?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-489.2"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3939
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 138 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report the credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap ; these derivatives are reported at fair value , with gains and losses recognized in principal transactions revenue . in contrast , the loans and lending-related commitments being risk-managed are accounted for on an accrual basis . this asymmetry in accounting treatment , between loans and lending-related commitments and the credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities , causes earnings volatility that is not representative , in the firm 2019s view , of the true changes in value of the firm 2019s overall credit exposure . the effectiveness of the firm 2019s credit default swap ( 201ccds 201d ) protection as a hedge of the firm 2019s exposures may vary depending on a number of factors , including the named reference entity ( i.e. , the firm may experience losses on specific exposures that are different than the named reference entities in the purchased cds ) , and the contractual terms of the cds ( which may have a defined credit event that does not align with an actual loss realized by the firm ) and the maturity of the firm 2019s cds protection ( which in some cases may be shorter than the firm 2019s exposures ) . however , the firm generally seeks to purchase credit protection with a maturity date that is the same or similar to the maturity date of the exposure for which the protection was purchased , and remaining differences in maturity are actively monitored and managed by the firm . credit portfolio hedges the following table sets out the fair value related to the firm 2019s credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities , the fair value related to the cva ( which reflects the credit quality of derivatives counterparty exposure ) , as well as certain other hedges used in the risk management of cva . these results can vary from period-to- period due to market conditions that affect specific positions in the portfolio . net gains and losses on credit portfolio hedges year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 hedges of loans and lending- related commitments $ ( 142 ) $ ( 163 ) $ ( 32 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hedges of loans and lending-related commitments</td><td>$ -142 ( 142 )</td><td>$ -163 ( 163 )</td><td>$ -32 ( 32 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cva and hedges of cva</td><td>-130 ( 130 )</td><td>127</td><td>-769 ( 769 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gains/ ( losses )</td><td>$ -272 ( 272 )</td><td>$ -36 ( 36 )</td><td>$ -801 ( 801 )</td></tr></table> community reinvestment act exposure the community reinvestment act ( 201ccra 201d ) encourages banks to meet the credit needs of borrowers in all segments of their communities , including neighborhoods with low or moderate incomes . the firm is a national leader in community development by providing loans , investments and community development services in communities across the united states . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the firm 2019s cra loan portfolio was approximately $ 18 billion and $ 16 billion , respectively . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , 50% ( 50 % ) and 62% ( 62 % ) , respectively , of the cra portfolio were residential mortgage loans ; 26% ( 26 % ) and 13% ( 13 % ) , respectively , were commercial real estate loans ; 16% ( 16 % ) and 18% ( 18 % ) , respectively , were business banking loans ; and 8% ( 8 % ) and 7% ( 7 % ) , respectively , were other loans . cra nonaccrual loans were 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , respectively , of the firm 2019s total nonaccrual loans . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , net charge-offs in the cra portfolio were 1% ( 1 % ) and 3% ( 3 % ) , respectively , of the firm 2019s net charge-offs in both years. .\nQuestion: how much did the firm 2019s cra loan portfolio in 2013 represent in relation to the one in 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.125"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1787
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n35% ( 35 % ) due primarily to certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no u.s . taxes are provided because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences , tax losses , and tax credits of $ 4.0 billion , and deferred tax liabilities of $ 14.9 billion . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences , will be sufficient to fully recover the deferred tax assets . the company will continue to evaluate the realizability of deferred tax assets quarterly by assessing the need for and amount of a valuation allowance . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . all irs audit issues for years prior to 2004 have been resolved . in addition , the company is subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities . management believes that adequate provisions have been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the years ended september 29 , 2012 , september 24 , 2011 , and september 25 , 2010 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 121251</td><td>$ 81570</td><td>$ 51011</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 10930</td><td>$ 5369</td><td>$ 5510</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>$ 791</td><td>$ 776</td><td>$ 1051</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 19111</td><td>$ 17018</td><td>$ 20956</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 50856</td><td>$ 37529</td><td>$ 18595</td></tr></table> as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had $ 121.3 billion in cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities , an increase of $ 39.7 billion or 49% ( 49 % ) from september 24 , 2011 . the principal components of this net increase was the cash generated by operating activities of $ 50.9 billion , which was partially offset by payments for acquisition of property , plant and equipment of $ 8.3 billion , payments for acquisition of intangible assets of $ 1.1 billion and payments of dividends and dividend equivalent rights of $ 2.5 billion . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly-rated securities and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer . the policy requires investments generally to be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , $ 82.6 billion and $ 54.3 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments , common stock repurchases , dividends on its common stock , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . capital assets the company 2019s capital expenditures were $ 10.3 billion during 2012 , consisting of $ 865 million for retail store facilities and $ 9.5 billion for other capital expenditures , including product tooling and manufacturing process .\nQuestion: what was the value of annual operating cash flow in 2011?\nAnswer: 37529.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2010?\nAnswer: 18595.0\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "18934.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6598
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntransfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2014 to december 31 , 2014 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>5854930</td><td>$ 18.93</td><td>5849517</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>4266</td><td>$ 20.29</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>826744</td><td>$ 19.67</td><td>826639</td><td>$ 143559758</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6685940</td><td>$ 19.02</td><td>6676156</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 5413 withheld shares in october 2014 , 4266 withheld shares in november 2014 and 105 withheld shares in december 2014 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2014 , the board authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2014 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2014 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .\nQuestion: what was the total number of shares purchased in october?\nAnswer: 5854930.0\nQuestion: and what was that in november?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "4266.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3584
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>138</td><td>185</td><td>229</td><td>266</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>118</td><td>157</td><td>178</td><td>181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>99</td><td>116</td><td>148</td><td>187</td><td>199</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 99 116 148 187 199 .\nQuestion: what is the change value of the s&p healthcare index from 2010 to 2015?\nAnswer: 99.0\nQuestion: what is the change in value of the s&p 500 from 2010 to 2015?\nAnswer: 81.0\nQuestion: what is the difference between the two values?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "18.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3356
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 11 2013 stock-based compensation during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 164 million , $ 189 million and $ 167 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated , net on our statements of earnings . the net impact to earnings for the respective years was $ 107 million , $ 122 million and $ 108 million . as of december 31 , 2014 , we had $ 91 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years . we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 308 million , $ 827 million and $ 440 million during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were reduced by $ 215 million , $ 158 million , $ 96 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements . stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) or other stock units . the exercise price of options to purchase common stock may not be less than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant . no award of stock options may become fully vested prior to the third anniversary of the grant and no portion of a stock option grant may become vested in less than one year . the minimum vesting period for restricted stock or stock units payable in stock is three years . award agreements may provide for shorter or pro-rated vesting periods or vesting following termination of employment in the case of death , disability , divestiture , retirement , change of control or layoff . the maximum term of a stock option or any other award is 10 years . at december 31 , 2014 , inclusive of the shares reserved for outstanding stock options , rsus and psus , we had 19 million shares reserved for issuance under the plans . at december 31 , 2014 , 7.8 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans . we issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options or when restrictions on rsus and psus have been satisfied . the following table summarizes activity related to nonvested rsus during 2014 : number of rsus ( in thousands ) weighted average grant-date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of rsus ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value pershare</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2011</td><td>4302</td><td>$ 78.25</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1987</td><td>81.93</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-1299 ( 1299 )</td><td>80.64</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-168 ( 168 )</td><td>79.03</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2012</td><td>4822</td><td>$ 79.10</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1356</td><td>89.24</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-2093 ( 2093 )</td><td>79.26</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-226 ( 226 )</td><td>81.74</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2013</td><td>3859</td><td>$ 82.42</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>745</td><td>146.85</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested</td><td>-2194 ( 2194 )</td><td>87.66</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-84 ( 84 )</td><td>91.11</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2014</td><td>2326</td><td>$ 97.80</td></tr></table> rsus are valued based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant . employees who are granted rsus receive the right to receive shares of stock after completion of the vesting period ; however , the shares are not issued and the employees cannot sell or transfer shares prior to vesting and have no voting rights until the rsus vest , generally three years from the date of the award . employees who are granted rsus receive dividend-equivalent cash payments only upon vesting . for these rsu awards , the grant-date fair value is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant less a discount to reflect the delay in payment of dividend-equivalent cash payments . we recognize the grant-date fair value of rsus , less estimated forfeitures , as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period , which beginning with the rsus granted in 2013 is shorter than the vesting period if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or will become retirement eligible before the end of the vesting period. .\nQuestion: what was the non-cash stock-based compensation expense in 2013?\nAnswer: 189.0\nQuestion: and in 2012?\nAnswer: 167.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?\nAnswer: 22.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.13174"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5280
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.89</td><td>$ 139.55</td><td>$ 124.88</td><td>$ 127.08</td><td>$ 122.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 128.68</td><td>$ 142.68</td><td>$ 149.69</td><td>$ 173.33</td><td>$ 182.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 131.84</td><td>$ 168.39</td><td>$ 188.00</td><td>$ 206.46</td><td>$ 209.40</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .\nQuestion: what was the value of the united parcel service inc . in 2007?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "122.64"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2944
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 12 2013 stock-based compensation during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 189 million , $ 167 million , and $ 157 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated costs on our statements of earnings . the net impact to earnings for the respective years was $ 122 million , $ 108 million , and $ 101 million . as of december 31 , 2013 , we had $ 132 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years . we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 827 million , $ 440 million , and $ 116 million during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 were reduced by $ 158 million , $ 96 million , and $ 56 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements . stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) , or other stock units . the exercise price of options to purchase common stock may not be less than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant . no award of stock options may become fully vested prior to the third anniversary of the grant , and no portion of a stock option grant may become vested in less than one year . the minimum vesting period for restricted stock or stock units payable in stock is three years . award agreements may provide for shorter or pro-rated vesting periods or vesting following termination of employment in the case of death , disability , divestiture , retirement , change of control , or layoff . the maximum term of a stock option or any other award is 10 years . at december 31 , 2013 , inclusive of the shares reserved for outstanding stock options , rsus and psus , we had 20.4 million shares reserved for issuance under the plans . at december 31 , 2013 , 4.7 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans . we issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options or when restrictions on rsus and psus have been satisfied . the following table summarizes activity related to nonvested rsus during 2013 : number of rsus ( in thousands ) weighted average grant-date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of rsus ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value pershare</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2012</td><td>4822</td><td>$ 79.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1356</td><td>89.24</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-2093 ( 2093 )</td><td>79.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-226 ( 226 )</td><td>81.74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2013</td><td>3859</td><td>$ 82.42</td></tr></table> rsus are valued based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant . employees who are granted rsus receive the right to receive shares of stock after completion of the vesting period , however , the shares are not issued , and the employees cannot sell or transfer shares prior to vesting and have no voting rights until the rsus vest , generally three years from the date of the award . employees who are granted rsus receive dividend-equivalent cash payments only upon vesting . for these rsu awards , the grant-date fair value is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant less a discount to reflect the delay in payment of dividend-equivalent cash payments . we recognize the grant-date fair value of rsus , less estimated forfeitures , as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period , which beginning with the rsus granted in 2013 is shorter than the vesting period if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or will become retirement eligible before the end of the vesting period . stock options we generally recognize compensation cost for stock options ratably over the three-year vesting period . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , there were 10.2 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.65 ) and 20.6 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.15 ) stock options outstanding . stock options outstanding at december 31 , 2013 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately five years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 663 million , and we expect nearly all of these stock options to vest . of the stock options outstanding , 7.7 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 84.37 ) have vested as of december 31 , 2013 and those stock options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately four years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 497 million . there were 10.1 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 82.72 ) stock options exercised during 2013 . we did not grant stock options to employees during 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the value of nonvested rsus at the end of 2013?\nAnswer: 3859.0\nQuestion: what was the value at the start?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "4822.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9261
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhas decreased during the period from 2002 to 2004 , principally due to the increase in earned premium and due to cost containment measures undertaken by management . in business insurance and personal lines , the expense ratio is expected to decrease further in 2005 , largely as a result of expected increases in earned premium . in specialty commercial , the expense ratio is expected to increase slightly in 2005 due to changes in the business mix , most notably the company 2019s decision in the fourth quarter of 2004 to exit the multi-peril crop insurance program which will eliminate significant expense reimbursements from the specialty commercial segment . policyholder dividend ratio : the policyholder dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholder dividends to earned premium . combined ratio : the combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio , the expense ratio and the policyholder dividend ratio . this ratio is a relative measurement that describes the related cost of losses and expense for every $ 100 of earned premiums . a combined ratio below 100.0 demonstrates underwriting profit ; a combined ratio above 100.0 demonstrates underwriting losses . the combined ratio has decreased from 2003 to 2004 primarily because of improvement in the expense ratio . the combined ratio in 2005 could be significantly higher or lower than the 2004 combined ratio depending on the level of catastrophe losses , but will also be impacted by changes in pricing and an expected moderation in favorable loss cost trends . catastrophe ratio : the catastrophe ratio ( a component of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio ) represents the ratio of catastrophe losses ( net of reinsurance ) to earned premiums . a catastrophe is an event that causes $ 25 or more in industry insured property losses and affects a significant number of property and casualty policyholders and insurers . by their nature , catastrophe losses vary dramatically from year to year . based on the mix and geographic dispersion of premium written and estimates derived from various catastrophe loss models , the company 2019s expected catastrophe ratio over the long-term is 3.0 points . before considering the reduction in ongoing operation 2019s catastrophe reserves related to september 11 of $ 298 in 2004 , the catastrophe ratio in 2004 was 5.3 points . see 201crisk management strategy 201d below for a discussion of the company 2019s property catastrophe risk management program that serves to mitigate the company 2019s net exposure to catastrophe losses . combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development : the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development represents the combined ratio for the current accident year , excluding the impact of catastrophes . the company believes this ratio is an important measure of the trend in profitability since it removes the impact of volatile and unpredictable catastrophe losses and prior accident year reserve development . before considering catastrophes , the combined ratio related to current accident year business has improved from 2002 to 2004 principally due to earned pricing increases and favorable claim frequency . other operations underwriting results : the other operations segment is responsible for managing operations of the hartford that have discontinued writing new or renewal business as well as managing the claims related to asbestos and environmental exposures . as such , neither earned premiums nor underwriting ratios are meaningful financial measures . instead , management believes that underwriting result is a more meaningful measure . the net underwriting loss for 2002 through 2004 is primarily due to prior accident year loss development , including $ 2.6 billion of net asbestos reserve strengthening in 2003 . reserve estimates within other operations , including estimates for asbestos and environmental claims , are inherently uncertain . refer to the other operations segment md&a for further discussion of other operation's underwriting results . total property & casualty investment earnings . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment yield after-tax</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>4.2% ( 4.2 % )</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized capital gains ( losses ) after-tax</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 165</td><td>$ -44 ( 44 )</td></tr></table> the investment return , or yield , on property & casualty 2019s invested assets is an important element of the company 2019s earnings since insurance products are priced with the assumption that premiums received can be invested for a period of time before loss and loss adjustment expenses are paid . for longer tail lines , such as workers 2019 compensation and general liability , claims are paid over several years and , therefore , the premiums received for these lines of business can generate significant investment income . him determines the appropriate allocation of investments by asset class and measures the investment yield performance for each asset class against market indices or other benchmarks . due to the emphasis on preservation of capital and the need to maintain sufficient liquidity to satisfy claim obligations , the vast majority of property and casualty 2019s invested assets have been held in fixed maturities , including , among other asset classes , corporate bonds , municipal bonds , government debt , short-term debt , mortgage- .\nQuestion: what was the net realized gain for the year of 2004?\nAnswer: 87.0\nQuestion: and what was it for 2003?\nAnswer: 165.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total net realized gain for both years?\nAnswer: 252.0\nQuestion: and what was the net realized gain in 2002?\nAnswer: 44.0\nQuestion: including 2002, what would then be the total net realized gain for the three years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "208.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA469
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis value of the company 2019s obligation relating to asbestos claims under the ppg settlement arrangement . the legal settlements net of insurance included aftertax charges of $ 80 million for the marvin legal settlement , net of insurance recoveries of $ 11 million , and $ 37 million for the impact of the federal glass class action antitrust legal settlement . results of reportable business segments net sales segment income ( millions ) 2006 2005 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>net sales 2006</td><td>net sales 2005</td><td>net sales 2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial coatings</td><td>$ 3236</td><td>$ 2921</td><td>$ 349</td><td>$ 284</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>performance and applied coatings</td><td>3088</td><td>2668</td><td>514</td><td>464</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>optical and specialty materials</td><td>1001</td><td>867</td><td>223</td><td>158</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodity chemicals</td><td>1483</td><td>1531</td><td>285</td><td>313</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>glass</td><td>2229</td><td>2214</td><td>148</td><td>123</td></tr></table> industrial coatings sales increased $ 315 million or 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 . sales increased 4% ( 4 % ) due to acquisitions , 4% ( 4 % ) due to increased volumes in the automotive , industrial and packaging coatings operating segments , 2% ( 2 % ) due to higher selling prices , particularly in the industrial and packaging coatings businesses and 1% ( 1 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation . segment income increased $ 65 million in 2006 . the increase in segment income was primarily due to the impact of increased sales volume , lower overhead and manufacturing costs , and the impact of acquisitions . segment income was reduced by the adverse impact of inflation , which was substantially offset by higher selling prices . performance and applied coatings sales increased $ 420 million or 16% ( 16 % ) in 2006 . sales increased 8% ( 8 % ) due to acquisitions , 4% ( 4 % ) due to higher selling prices in the refinish , aerospace and architectural coatings operating segments , 3% ( 3 % ) due to increased volumes in our aerospace and architectural coatings businesses and 1% ( 1 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation . segment income increased $ 50 million in 2006 . the increase in segment income was primarily due to the impact of increased sales volume and higher selling prices , which more than offset the impact of inflation . segment income was reduced by increased overhead costs to support growth in our architectural coatings business . optical and specialty materials sales increased $ 134 million or 15% ( 15 % ) in 2006 . sales increased 10% ( 10 % ) due to higher volumes , particularly in optical products and fine chemicals and 5% ( 5 % ) due to acquisitions in our optical products business . segment income increased $ 65 million in 2006 . the absence of the 2005 charge for an asset impairment in our fine chemicals business increased segment income by $ 27 million . the remaining $ 38 million increase in segment income was primarily due to increased volumes , lower manufacturing costs , and the absence of the 2005 hurricane costs of $ 3 million , net of 2006 insurance recoveries , which were only partially offset by increased overhead costs in our optical products business to support growth and the negative impact of inflation . commodity chemicals sales decreased $ 48 million or 3% ( 3 % ) in 2006 . sales decreased 4% ( 4 % ) due to lower chlor-alkali volumes and increased 1% ( 1 % ) due to higher selling prices . segment income decreased $ 28 million in 2006 . the year- over-year decline in segment income was due primarily to lower sales volumes and higher manufacturing costs associated with reduced production levels . the absence of the 2005 charges for direct costs related to hurricanes increased segment income by $ 29 million . the impact of higher selling prices ; lower inflation , primarily natural gas costs , and an insurance recovery of $ 10 million related to the 2005 hurricane losses also increased segment income in 2006 . our fourth-quarter chlor-alkali sales volumes and earnings were negatively impacted by production outages at several customers over the last two months of 2006 . it is uncertain when some of these customers will return to a normal level of production which may impact the sales and earnings of our chlor-alkali business in early 2007 . glass sales increased $ 15 million or 1% ( 1 % ) in 2006 . sales increased 1% ( 1 % ) due to improved volumes resulting from a combination of organic growth and an acquisition . a slight positive impact on sales due to foreign currency translation offset a slight decline in pricing . volumes increased in the performance glazings , automotive replacement glass and services and fiber glass businesses . automotive oem glass volume declined during 2006 . pricing was also up in performance glazings , but declined in the other glass businesses . segment income increased $ 25 million in 2006 . this increase in segment income was primarily the result of higher equity earnings from our asian fiber glass joint ventures , higher royalty income and lower manufacturing and natural gas costs , which more than offset the negative impacts of higher inflation , lower margin mix of sales and reduced selling prices . our fiber glass operating segment made progress during 2006 in achieving our multi-year plan to improve profitability and cash flow . a transformation of our supply chain , which includes production of a more focused product mix at each manufacturing plant , manufacturing cost reduction initiatives and improved equity earnings from our asian joint ventures are the primary focus and represent the critical success factors in this plan . during 2006 , our new joint venture in china started producing high labor content fiber glass reinforcement products , which will allow us to refocus our u.s . production capacity on higher margin , direct process products . the 2006 earnings improvement by our fiber glass operating segment accounted for the bulk of the 2006 improvement in the glass reportable business segment income . 20 2006 ppg annual report and form 10-k 4282_txt .\nQuestion: what is the sum between the segment income increased by asset impairment in fine chemicals business and the optical and specialty materials segment income of 2005?\nAnswer: 185.0\nQuestion: what is the segment income increased by asset impairment in fine chemicals business of 2005?\nAnswer: 27.0\nQuestion: how much does that segment income increase represents in relation to that sum?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.14595"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10503
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nholding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .\nQuestion: what is the goodwill in 2010?\nAnswer: 8.6\nQuestion: what about in 2009?\nAnswer: 6.1\nQuestion: what is the increase?\nAnswer: 2.5\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.40984"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2456
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 570</td><td>$ 1265</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2150</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>136</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2856</td><td>$ 2040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 . the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total notional amount of the company's derivatives from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: 816.0\nQuestion: and what was that amount in 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "2040.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9576
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2011 compared to 2010 mfc 2019s net sales for 2011 increased $ 533 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase was attributable to higher volume of about $ 420 million on air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) ; and about $ 245 million from fire control systems programs primarily related to the sof clss program , which began late in the third quarter of 2010 . partially offsetting these increases were lower net sales due to decreased volume of approximately $ 75 million primarily from various services programs and approximately $ 20 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily mlrs and jassm ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2011 increased $ 96 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of about $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) as a result of increased volume and retirement of risks ; and approximately $ 25 million for various services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 35 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to increased orders on air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad ) . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales for 2013 will be comparable with 2012 . we expect low double digit percentage growth in air and missile defense programs , offset by an expected decline in volume on logistics services programs . operating profit and margin are expected to be comparable with 2012 results . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides surface ship and submarine combat systems ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; unmanned technologies and platforms ; ship systems integration ; and military and commercial training systems . mst 2019s major programs include aegis , mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) , tpq-53 radar system , mh-60 , lcs , and ptds . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7579</td><td>$ 7132</td><td>$ 7443</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>737</td><td>645</td><td>713</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>10700</td><td>10500</td><td>10600</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mst 2019s net sales for 2012 increased $ 447 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase in net sales for 2012 was attributable to higher volume and risk retirements of approximately $ 395 million from ship and aviation system programs ( primarily ptds ; lcs ; vls ; and mh-60 ) ; about $ 115 million for training and logistics solutions programs primarily due to net sales from sim industries , which was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and approximately $ 30 million as a result of increased volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 70 million from undersea systems programs due to lower volume on an international combat system program and towed array systems ; and about $ 25 million due to lower volume on various other programs . mst 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 92 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 175 million from ship and aviation system programs , which reflects higher volume and risk retirements on certain programs ( primarily vls ; ptds ; mh-60 ; and lcs ) and reserves of about $ 55 million for contract cost matters on ship and aviation system programs recorded in the fourth quarter of 2011 ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) . partially offsetting the increase was lower operating profit of approximately $ 40 million from undersea systems programs due to reduced profit booking rates on certain programs and lower volume on an international combat system program and towed array systems ; and about $ 40 million due to lower volume on various other programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 150 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .\nQuestion: what was the operating profit for mst in 2011?\nAnswer: 645.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2010?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "713.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4826
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbetween the actual return on plan assets compared to the expected return on plan assets ( u.s . pension plans had an actual rate of return of 7.8 percent compared to an expected rate of return of 6.9 percent ) . 2022 2015 net mark-to-market loss of $ 179 million - primarily due to the difference between the actual return on plan assets compared to the expected return on plan assets ( u.s . pension plans had an actual rate of return of ( 2.0 ) percent compared to an expected rate of return of 7.4 percent ) which was partially offset by higher discount rates at the end of 2015 compared to 2014 . the net mark-to-market losses were in the following results of operations line items: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of goods sold</td><td>$ -29 ( 29 )</td><td>$ 476</td><td>$ 122</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>selling general and administrative expenses</td><td>244</td><td>382</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development expenses</td><td>86</td><td>127</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 301</td><td>$ 985</td><td>$ 179</td></tr></table> effective january 1 , 2018 , we adopted new accounting guidance issued by the fasb related to the presentation of net periodic pension and opeb costs . this guidance requires that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost . service cost is required to be reported in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period . the other components of net benefit cost are required to be reported outside the subtotal for income from operations . as a result , components of pension and opeb costs , other than service costs , will be reclassified from operating costs to other income/expense . this change will be applied retrospectively to prior years . in the fourth quarter of 2017 , the company reviewed and made changes to the mortality assumptions primarily for our u.s . pension plans which resulted in an overall increase in the life expectancy of plan participants . as of december 31 , 2017 these changes resulted in an increase in our liability for postemployment benefits of approximately $ 290 million . in the fourth quarter of 2016 , the company adopted new mortality improvement scales released by the soa for our u.s . pension and opeb plans . as of december 31 , 2016 , this resulted in an increase in our liability for postemployment benefits of approximately $ 200 million . in the first quarter of 2017 , we announced the closure of our gosselies , belgium facility . this announcement impacted certain employees that participated in a defined benefit pension plan and resulted in a curtailment and the recognition of termination benefits . in march 2017 , we recognized a net loss of $ 20 million for the curtailment and termination benefits . in addition , we announced the decision to phase out production at our aurora , illinois , facility , which resulted in termination benefits of $ 9 million for certain hourly employees that participate in our u.s . hourly defined benefit pension plan . beginning in 2016 , we elected to utilize a full yield curve approach in the estimation of service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows . service and interest costs in 2017 and 2016 were lower by $ 140 million and $ 180 million , respectively , under the new method than they would have been under the previous method . this change had no impact on our year-end defined benefit pension and opeb obligations or our annual net periodic benefit cost as the lower service and interest costs were entirely offset in the actuarial loss ( gain ) reported for the respective year . we expect our total defined benefit pension and opeb expense ( excluding the impact of mark-to-market gains and losses ) to decrease approximately $ 80 million in 2018 . this decrease is primarily due to a higher expected return on plan assets as a result of a higher asset base in 2018 . in general , our strategy for both the u.s . and the non-u.s . pensions includes ongoing alignment of our investments to our liabilities , while reducing risk in our portfolio . for our u.s . pension plans , our year-end 2017 asset allocation was 34 a0percent equities , 62 a0percent fixed income and 4 percent other . our current u.s . pension target asset allocation is 30 percent equities and 70 percent fixed income . the target allocation is revisited periodically to ensure it reflects our overall objectives . the u.s . plans are rebalanced to plus or minus 5 percentage points of the target asset allocation ranges on a monthly basis . the year-end 2017 asset allocation for our non-u.s . pension plans was 40 a0percent equities , 53 a0percent fixed income , 4 a0percent real estate and 3 percent other . the 2017 weighted-average target allocations for our non-u.s . pension plans was 38 a0percent equities , 54 a0percent fixed income , 5 a0percent real estate and 3 a0percent other . the target allocations for each plan vary based upon local statutory requirements , demographics of the plan participants and funded status . the frequency of rebalancing for the non-u.s . plans varies depending on the plan . contributions to our pension and opeb plans were $ 1.6 billion and $ 329 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the 2017 contributions include a $ 1.0 billion discretionary contribution made to our u.s . pension plans in december 2017 . we expect to make approximately $ 365 million of contributions to our pension and opeb plans in 2018 . we believe we have adequate resources to fund both pension and opeb plans . 48 | 2017 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the total of pension and opb contributions in 2017, in millions?\nAnswer: 1600.0\nQuestion: and what was the change in that total from 2017 to 2018?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-1235.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4991
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market information our common stock is listed and traded on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201cipg 201d . as of february 13 , 2019 , there were approximately 10000 registered holders of our outstanding common stock . on february 13 , 2019 , we announced that our board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) had declared a common stock cash dividend of $ 0.235 per share , payable on march 15 , 2019 to holders of record as of the close of business on march 1 , 2019 . although it is the board 2019s current intention to declare and pay future dividends , there can be no assurance that such additional dividends will in fact be declared and paid . any and the amount of any such declaration is at the discretion of the board and will depend upon factors such as our earnings , financial position and cash requirements . equity compensation plans see item 12 for information about our equity compensation plans . transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2018 to december 31 , 2018 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>3824</td><td>$ 23.30</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 338421933</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1750</td><td>$ 23.77</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 338421933</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 338421933</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5574</td><td>$ 23.45</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 the total number of shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , repurchased were withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock- based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum in the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations by the sum of the number of withheld shares . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . in february 2018 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock , which was in addition to any amounts remaining under the 2017 share repurchase program . on july 2 , 2018 , in connection with the announcement of the acxiom acquisition , we announced that share repurchases will be suspended for a period of time in order to reduce the increased debt levels incurred in conjunction with the acquisition , and no shares were repurchased pursuant to the share repurchase programs in the periods reflected . there are no expiration dates associated with the share repurchase programs. .\nQuestion: what was the total number of shares purchased in november?\nAnswer: 3824.0\nQuestion: and what was it in october?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1750.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9649
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nuntil the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings . changes in the fair value of the derivatives that are attributable to the ineffective portion of the hedges , or of derivatives that are not considered to be highly effective hedges , if any , are immediately recognized in earnings . the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding foreign currency hedges at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.3 billion and $ 1.7 billion . the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding interest rate swaps at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 503 million and $ 450 million . derivative instruments did not have a material impact on net earnings and comprehensive income during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 . substantially all of our derivatives are designated for hedge accounting . see note 15 for more information on the fair value measurements related to our derivative instruments . stock-based compensation 2013 compensation cost related to all share-based payments including stock options and restricted stock units is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award . we generally recognize the compensation cost ratably over a three-year vesting period . income taxes 2013 we periodically assess our tax filing exposures related to periods that are open to examination . based on the latest available information , we evaluate our tax positions to determine whether the position will more likely than not be sustained upon examination by the internal revenue service ( irs ) . if we cannot reach a more-likely-than-not determination , no benefit is recorded . if we determine that the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained , we record the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not to be realized when the tax position is settled . we record interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of income tax expense on our statements of earnings . interest and penalties are not material . accumulated other comprehensive loss 2013 changes in the balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of income taxes , consisted of the following ( in millions ) : postretirement benefit plan adjustments other , net accumulated comprehensive . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>postretirement benefit plan adjustments</td><td>other net</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive loss</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2010</td><td>$ -8564 ( 8564 )</td><td>$ -31 ( 31 )</td><td>$ -8595 ( 8595 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other comprehensive ( loss ) income</td><td>-430 ( 430 )</td><td>15</td><td>-415 ( 415 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>-8994 ( 8994 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>-9010 ( 9010 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other comprehensive loss</td><td>-2192 ( 2192 )</td><td>-55 ( 55 )</td><td>-2247 ( 2247 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>-11186 ( 11186 )</td><td>-71 ( 71 )</td><td>-11257 ( 11257 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other comprehensive ( loss ) income</td><td>-2346 ( 2346 )</td><td>110</td><td>-2236 ( 2236 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ -13532 ( 13532 )</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ -13493 ( 13493 )</td></tr></table> the postretirement benefit plan adjustments are shown net of tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 of $ 7.4 billion , $ 6.1 billion , and $ 4.9 billion . these tax benefits include amounts recognized on our income tax returns as current deductions and deferred income taxes , which will be recognized on our tax returns in future years . see note 7 and note 9 for more information on our income taxes and postretirement plans . recent accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2012 , we retrospectively adopted new guidance issued by the financial accounting standards board by presenting total comprehensive income and the components of net income and other comprehensive loss in two separate but consecutive statements . the adoption of this guidance resulted only in a change in how we present other comprehensive loss in our consolidated financial statements and did not have any impact on our results of operations , financial position , or cash flows. .\nQuestion: what was the value of post retirement benefit plan adjustments at the end of 2010?\nAnswer: 8994.0\nQuestion: what was the value at the start of 2010?\nAnswer: 8564.0\nQuestion: what was the net change through the year?\nAnswer: 430.0\nQuestion: what was the value at the start of 2010?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "8564.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5022
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements liability to $ 60 million , and recorded the $ 2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense . the $ 60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price . as of december 31 , 2016 , entergy louisiana , in connection with the waterford 3 lease obligation , had a future minimum lease payment ( reflecting an interest rate of 8.09% ( 8.09 % ) ) of $ 57.5 million , including $ 2.3 million in interest , due january 2017 that is recorded as long-term debt . in february 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to entergy louisiana . grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the initial term of the leases expired in july 2015 . system energy renewed the leases for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in july 2036 . at the end of the new lease renewal terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf or renew the leases at fair market value . in the event that system energy does not renew or purchase the interests , system energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of grand gulf 2019s capacity and energy . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 55.6 million and $ 55.6 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 17188</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>17188</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>17188</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>17188</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>17188</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>257812</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>343752</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>309393</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 34359</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the implicit interest rate numerically, or not in percentage?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.0513"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10810
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnet revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2013 to 2012 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012 net revenue</td><td>$ 4969</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>236</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>165</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grand gulf recovery</td><td>75</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>miso deferral</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decommissioning trusts</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>2013 net revenue</td><td>$ 5524</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana , effective january 2013 , which includes an increase relating to the waterford 3 steam generator replacement project , which was placed in service in december 2012 . the net income effect of the formula rate plan increase is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 the recovery of hinds plant costs through the power management rider at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of 2013 . the net income effect of the hinds plant cost recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity on the net plant investment with the remainder offset by the hinds plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 an increase in the capacity acquisition rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective with the first billing cycle of december 2012 , relating to the hot spring plant acquisition . the net income effect of the hot spring plant cost recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity on the net plant investment with the remainder offset by the hot spring plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 increases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2013 and july 2012 . energy efficiency revenues are offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have no effect on net income ; 2022 an annual base rate increase at entergy texas , effective july 2012 , as a result of the puct 2019s order that was issued in september 2012 in the november 2011 rate case ; and 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy mississippi , effective september 2013 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate proceedings . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in the second quarter 2012 because entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana agreed to share with customers the savings from an irs settlement related to the uncertain tax position regarding the hurricane katrina and hurricane rita louisiana act 55 financing . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the tax settlement . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .\nQuestion: what is the net change in revenues from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: 555.0\nQuestion: what is the value of volume/weather divided by the net change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.07207"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9006
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nproducts and software , as well as ongoing investment in next-generation technologies , partially offset by savings from cost-reduction initiatives . reorganization of business charges increased due to employee severance costs and expenses related to the exit of a facility . sg&a expenses decreased , primarily due to lower marketing expenses and savings from cost-reduction initiatives , partially offset by increased expenditures on information technology upgrades . as a percentage of net sales in 2007 as compared to 2006 , gross margin and operating margin decreased , and sg&a expenses and r&d expenditures increased . the segment 2019s backlog was $ 647 million at december 31 , 2007 , compared to $ 1.4 billion at december 31 , 2006 . this decrease in backlog was primarily due to a decline in customer demand driven by the segment 2019s limited product portfolio . the segment shipped 159.1 million units in 2007 , a 27% ( 27 % ) decrease compared to shipments of 217.4 million units in 2006 . the overall decrease reflects decreased unit shipments of products for all technologies . for the full year 2007 , unit shipments : ( i ) decreased substantially in asia and emea , ( ii ) decreased in north america , and ( iii ) increased in latin america . although unit shipments by the segment decreased in 2007 , total unit shipments in the worldwide handset market increased by approximately 16% ( 16 % ) . the segment estimates its worldwide market share was approximately 14% ( 14 % ) for the full year 2007 , a decrease of approximately 8 percentage points versus full year 2006 . in 2007 , asp decreased approximately 9% ( 9 % ) compared to 2006 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the product-tier and geographic mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 and 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 . the segment has several large customers located throughout the world . in 2007 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 42% ( 42 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sells products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which account for approximately 33% ( 33 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 54% ( 54 % ) of our segment 2019s 2007 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were brazil , china and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol video and broadcast network interactive set-tops , end-to-end video delivery systems , broadband access infrastructure platforms , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201cnetwork business 201d ) . in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 33% ( 33 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 2008 20142007 2007 20142006 years ended december 31 percent change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 2008</td><td>years ended december 31 2007</td><td>years ended december 31 2006</td><td>years ended december 31 2008 20142007</td><td>2007 20142006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment net sales</td><td>$ 10086</td><td>$ 10014</td><td>$ 9164</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating earnings</td><td>918</td><td>709</td><td>787</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> segment results 20142008 compared to 2007 in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 1% ( 1 % ) to $ 10.1 billion , compared to $ 10.0 billion in 2007 . the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales primarily reflects a 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by an 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business . the 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business is primarily driven by a 17% ( 17 % ) increase in net sales of digital entertainment devices , reflecting a 19% ( 19 % ) increase in unit shipments to 18.0 million units , partially offset by lower asp due to product mix shift and pricing pressure . the 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business was primarily driven by : ( i ) the absence of net sales by the embedded communication computing group ( 201cecc 201d ) that was divested at the end of 2007 , and ( ii ) lower net sales of iden , gsm and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of umts infrastructure equipment . on a geographic basis , the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales was primarily driven by higher net sales in latin america and asia , partially offset by lower net sales in north america . the increase in net sales in latin america was 63management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 066000000 ***%%pcmsg|63 |00024|yes|no|02/24/2009 12:31|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .\nQuestion: what is 21% of the 2006 segment net sales?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1924.44"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2571
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 73 of 98 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 15 . shareholders 2019 equity at december 31 , 2006 , the company had 550 million shares of common stock and 15 million shares of preferred stock authorized , both without par value . preferred stock includes 120000 authorized but unissued shares designated as series a junior participating preferred stock . under the company 2019s shareholder rights agreement dated july 26 , 2006 , one preferred stock purchase right ( right ) is attached to each outstanding share of ball corporation common stock . subject to adjustment , each right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the company one one-thousandth of a share of series a junior participating preferred stock at an exercise price of $ 185 per right . if a person or group acquires 10 percent or more of the company 2019s outstanding common stock ( or upon occurrence of certain other events ) , the rights ( other than those held by the acquiring person ) become exercisable and generally entitle the holder to purchase shares of ball corporation common stock at a 50 percent discount . the rights , which expire in 2016 , are redeemable by the company at a redemption price of $ 0.001 per right and trade with the common stock . exercise of such rights would cause substantial dilution to a person or group attempting to acquire control of the company without the approval of ball 2019s board of directors . the rights would not interfere with any merger or other business combinations approved by the board of directors . the company reduced its share repurchase program in 2006 to $ 45.7 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 358.1 million net repurchases in 2005 and $ 50 million in 2004 . the net repurchases in 2006 did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares . the contract was settled on january 5 , 2007 , for $ 51.9 million in cash . in connection with the employee stock purchase plan , the company contributes 20 percent of up to $ 500 of each participating employee 2019s monthly payroll deduction toward the purchase of ball corporation common stock . company contributions for this plan were $ 3.2 million in 2006 , $ 3.2 million in 2005 and $ 2.7 million in 2004 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>pension and other postretirement items net of tax</td><td>effective financial derivatives net of tax</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2003</td><td>$ 80.7</td><td>$ -93.1 ( 93.1 )</td><td>$ 11.0</td><td>$ -1.4 ( 1.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2004 change</td><td>68.2</td><td>-33.2 ( 33.2 )</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>34.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2004</td><td>148.9</td><td>-126.3 ( 126.3 )</td><td>10.6</td><td>33.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2005 change</td><td>-74.3 ( 74.3 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td><td>-16.0 ( 16.0 )</td><td>-133.9 ( 133.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2005</td><td>74.6</td><td>-169.9 ( 169.9 )</td><td>-5.4 ( 5.4 )</td><td>-100.7 ( 100.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2006 change</td><td>57.2</td><td>8.0</td><td>6.0</td><td>71.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>$ 131.8</td><td>$ -161.9 ( 161.9 )</td><td>$ 0.6</td><td>$ -29.5 ( 29.5 )</td></tr></table> notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the minimum pension liability is presented net of related tax expense of $ 2.9 million for 2006 and related tax benefits of $ 27.3 million and $ 20.8 million for 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 , related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 and related tax benefit of $ 0.2 million for 2004. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in repurchases between 2005 and 2006?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "312.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9778
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>1231868</td><td>$ 20.74</td><td>1230394</td><td>$ 214001430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1723139</td><td>$ 18.89</td><td>1722246</td><td>$ 181474975</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1295639</td><td>$ 20.25</td><td>1285000</td><td>$ 155459545</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>4250646</td><td>$ 19.84</td><td>4237640</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .\nQuestion: what is the total of withheld shares in the months of october and november, combined?\nAnswer: 2367.0\nQuestion: including december, what then becomes that total of withheld shares?\nAnswer: 13006.0\nQuestion: and what is the average of withheld shares between those three months?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "4335.33333"
}
] |
CONVFINQA55
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 136.18</td><td>$ 186.17</td><td>$ 204.57</td><td>$ 221.68</td><td>$ 298.31</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.03</td><td>183.26</td><td>200.42</td><td>201.40</td><td>258.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.75</td><td>174.57</td><td>201.06</td><td>197.92</td><td>242.94</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.99</td><td>153.55</td><td>174.55</td><td>176.95</td><td>198.10</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) .\nQuestion: what was the value of the kbw bank index in 2016?\nAnswer: 258.82\nQuestion: and what was the change in value of the stock from 2011 to 2016?\nAnswer: 158.82\nQuestion: how much does that change represent in relation to the original 2011 value?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.5882"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8670
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nindemnification and repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make-whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . in connection with pooled settlements , we typically do not repurchase loans and the consummation of such transactions generally results in us no longer having indemnification and repurchase exposure with the investor in the transaction . for the first and second-lien mortgage balances of unresolved and settled claims contained in the tables below , a significant amount of these claims were associated with sold loans originated through correspondent lender and broker origination channels . in certain instances when indemnification or repurchase claims are settled for these types of sold loans , we have recourse back to the correspondent lenders , brokers and other third-parties ( e.g. , contract underwriting companies , closing agents , appraisers , etc. ) . depending on the underlying reason for the investor claim , we determine our ability to pursue recourse with these parties and file claims with them accordingly . our historical recourse recovery rate has been insignificant as our efforts have been impacted by the inability of such parties to reimburse us for their recourse obligations ( e.g. , their capital availability or whether they remain in business ) or factors that limit our ability to pursue recourse from these parties ( e.g. , contractual loss caps , statutes of limitations ) . origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity , and , accordingly , management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements . we establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased . for the first and second- lien mortgage sold portfolio , we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made , demand patterns observed to date and/or expected in the future , and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis . to estimate the mortgage repurchase liability arising from breaches of representations and warranties , we consider the following factors : ( i ) borrower performance in our historically sold portfolio ( both actual and estimated future defaults ) , ( ii ) the level of outstanding unresolved repurchase claims , ( iii ) estimated probable future repurchase claims , considering information about file requests , delinquent and liquidated loans , resolved and unresolved mortgage insurance rescission notices and our historical experience with claim rescissions , ( iv ) the potential ability to cure the defects identified in the repurchase claims ( 201crescission rate 201d ) , and ( v ) the estimated severity of loss upon repurchase of the loan or collateral , make-whole settlement , or indemnification . see note 24 commitments and guarantees in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . the following tables present the unpaid principal balance of repurchase claims by vintage and total unresolved repurchase claims for the past five quarters . table 28 : analysis of quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims by vintage dollars in millions december 31 september 30 june 30 march 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>june 30 2012</td><td>march 31 2012</td><td>december 312011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004 & prior</td><td>$ 11</td><td>$ 15</td><td>$ 31</td><td>$ 10</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>8</td><td>10</td><td>19</td><td>12</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>23</td><td>30</td><td>56</td><td>41</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>45</td><td>137</td><td>182</td><td>100</td><td>90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2008</td><td>7</td><td>23</td><td>49</td><td>17</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 & prior</td><td>94</td><td>215</td><td>337</td><td>180</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2009 2013 2012</td><td>38</td><td>52</td><td>42</td><td>33</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 379</td><td>$ 213</td><td>$ 189</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fnma fhlmc and gnma % ( % )</td><td>94% ( 94 % )</td><td>87% ( 87 % )</td><td>86% ( 86 % )</td><td>88% ( 88 % )</td><td>91% ( 91 % )</td></tr></table> the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 79 .\nQuestion: what was the total of originations for 2012 quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims in the second quarter of 2006?\nAnswer: 41.0\nQuestion: and what was it in the first quarter?\nAnswer: 28.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the variation between these quarters?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "13.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3338
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements of annual compensation was made . for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and , 2007 , we made matching contributions of approxi- mately $ 450000 , $ 503000 and $ 457000 , respectively . note 17 / commitments and contingencies we and our operating partnership are not presently involved in any mate- rial litigation nor , to our knowledge , is any material litigation threatened against us or our properties , other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business . management believes the costs , if any , incurred by us and our operating partnership related to this litigation will not materially affect our financial position , operating results or liquidity . we have entered into employment agreements with certain executives , which expire between june 2010 and january 2013 . the minimum cash-based compensation , including base salary and guaran- teed bonus payments , associated with these employment agreements totals approximately $ 7.8 million for 2010 . in march 1998 , we acquired an operating sub-leasehold posi- tion at 420 lexington avenue . the operating sub-leasehold position required annual ground lease payments totaling $ 6.0 million and sub- leasehold position payments totaling $ 1.1 million ( excluding an operating sub-lease position purchased january 1999 ) . in june 2007 , we renewed and extended the maturity date of the ground lease at 420 lexington avenue through december 31 , 2029 , with an option for further exten- sion through 2080 . ground lease rent payments through 2029 will total approximately $ 10.9 million per year . thereafter , the ground lease will be subject to a revaluation by the parties thereto . in june 2009 , we acquired an operating sub-leasehold posi- tion at 420 lexington avenue for approximately $ 7.7 million . these sub-leasehold positions were scheduled to mature in december 2029 . in october 2009 , we acquired the remaining sub-leasehold position for $ 7.6 million . the property located at 711 third avenue operates under an operating sub-lease , which expires in 2083 . under the sub-lease , we are responsible for ground rent payments of $ 1.55 million annually through july 2011 on the 50% ( 50 % ) portion of the fee we do not own . the ground rent is reset after july 2011 based on the estimated fair market value of the property . we have an option to buy out the sub-lease at a fixed future date . the property located at 461 fifth avenue operates under a ground lease ( approximately $ 2.1 million annually ) with a term expiration date of 2027 and with two options to renew for an additional 21 years each , followed by a third option for 15 years . we also have an option to purchase the ground lease for a fixed price on a specific date . the property located at 625 madison avenue operates under a ground lease ( approximately $ 4.6 million annually ) with a term expiration date of 2022 and with two options to renew for an additional 23 years . the property located at 1185 avenue of the americas oper- ates under a ground lease ( approximately $ 8.5 million in 2010 and $ 6.9 million annually thereafter ) with a term expiration of 2020 and with an option to renew for an additional 23 years . in april 1988 , the sl green predecessor entered into a lease agreement for the property at 673 first avenue , which has been capitalized for financial statement purposes . land was estimated to be approximately 70% ( 70 % ) of the fair market value of the property . the portion of the lease attributed to land is classified as an operating lease and the remainder as a capital lease . the initial lease term is 49 years with an option for an additional 26 years . beginning in lease years 11 and 25 , the lessor is entitled to additional rent as defined by the lease agreement . we continue to lease the 673 first avenue property , which has been classified as a capital lease with a cost basis of $ 12.2 million and cumulative amortization of $ 5.5 million and $ 5.2 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments under capital leases and noncancellable operating leases with initial terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) : non-cancellable december 31 , capital lease operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>capital lease</td><td>non-cancellable operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 1451</td><td>$ 31347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>1555</td><td>28929</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>1555</td><td>28179</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>1555</td><td>28179</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>1555</td><td>28179</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>45649</td><td>580600</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>53320</td><td>$ 725413</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less amount representing interest</td><td>-36437 ( 36437 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 16883</td><td>-</td></tr></table> note 18 / financial instruments : derivatives and hedging we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earn- ings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings . reported net income and stockholders 2019 equity may increase or decrease prospectively , depending on future levels of interest rates and other variables affecting the fair values of derivative instruments and hedged items , but will have no effect on cash flows. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of capital and non-cancellable operating leases in 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "29734.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6996
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 130 the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib and consumer/cio positions for 2009 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 227 out of 261 days in this period , with 69 days exceeding $ 160 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence level var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . losses were sustained on 34 days during 2009 and exceeded the var measure on one day due to high market volatility in the first quarter of 2009 . under the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence interval , the firm would expect to incur daily losses greater than that pre- dicted by var estimates about twelve times a year . the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>$ 39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>$ 37</td></tr></table> loss advisories and drawdowns loss advisories and drawdowns are tools used to highlight to senior management trading losses above certain levels and initiate discus- sion of remedies . economic value stress testing while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in normal markets , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm conducts economic- value stress tests using multiple scenarios that assume credit spreads widen significantly , equity prices decline and significant changes in interest rates across the major currencies . other scenar- ios focus on the risks predominant in individual business segments and include scenarios that focus on the potential for adverse movements in complex portfolios . scenarios were updated more frequently in 2009 and , in some cases , redefined to reflect the signifi- cant market volatility which began in late 2008 . along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . stress testing enhances the understanding of the firm 2019s risk profile and loss potential , and stress losses are monitored against limits . stress testing is also utilized in one-off approvals and cross-business risk measurement , as well as an input to economic capital allocation . stress-test results , trends and explanations based on current market risk positions are reported to the firm 2019s senior management and to the lines of business to help them better measure and manage risks and to understand event risk 2013sensitive positions. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the credit spread from 2008 to 2009, in millions of dollars?\nAnswer: 2.0\nQuestion: and how much did that credit spread in 2009 represent in relation to the 2008 one?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.05405"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7505
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n32| | duke realty corporation annual report 2012 2022 in 2010 , we sold approximately 60 acres of land , in two separate transactions , which resulted in impairment charges of $ 9.8 million . these sales were opportunistic in nature and we had not identified or actively marketed this land for disposition , as it was previously intended to be held for development . general and administrative expenses general and administrative expenses increased from $ 41.3 million in 2010 to $ 43.1 million in 2011 . the following table sets forth the factors that led to the increase in general and administrative expenses from 2010 to 2011 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2010</td><td>$ 41.3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increase to overall pool of overhead costs ( 1 )</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increased absorption of costs by wholly-owned development and leasing activities ( 2 )</td><td>-3.7 ( 3.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increased allocation of costs to service operations and rental operations</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2011</td><td>$ 43.1</td></tr></table> interest expense interest expense from continuing operations increased from $ 186.4 million in 2010 to $ 220.5 million in 2011 . the increase was primarily a result of increased average outstanding debt during 2011 compared to 2010 , which was driven by our acquisition activities as well as other uses of capital . a $ 7.2 million decrease in the capitalization of interest costs , the result of developed properties no longer meeting the criteria for interest capitalization , also contributed to the increase in interest expense . gain ( loss ) on debt transactions there were no gains or losses on debt transactions during 2011 . during 2010 , through a cash tender offer and open market transactions , we repurchased certain of our outstanding series of unsecured notes scheduled to mature in 2011 and 2013 . in total , we paid $ 292.2 million for unsecured notes that had a face value of $ 279.9 million . we recognized a net loss on extinguishment of $ 16.3 million after considering the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs , discounts and other accounting adjustments . acquisition-related activity during 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 2.3 million in acquisition costs , compared to $ 1.9 million of such costs in 2010 . during 2011 , we also recognized a $ 1.1 million gain related to the acquisition of a building from one of our 50%-owned unconsolidated joint ventures , compared to a $ 57.7 million gain in 2010 on the acquisition of our joint venture partner 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) interest in dugan . critical accounting policies the preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with gaap requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period . our estimates , judgments and assumptions are inherently subjective and based on the existing business and market conditions , and are therefore continually evaluated based upon available information and experience . note 2 to the consolidated financial statements includes further discussion of our significant accounting policies . our management has assessed the accounting policies used in the preparation of our financial statements and discussed them with our audit committee and independent auditors . the following accounting policies are considered critical based upon materiality to the financial statements , degree of judgment involved in estimating reported amounts and sensitivity to changes in industry and economic conditions : ( 1 ) the increase to our overall pool of overhead costs from 2010 is largely due to increased severance pay related to overhead reductions that took place near the end of 2011 . ( 2 ) our total leasing activity increased and we also increased wholly owned development activities from 2010 . we capitalized $ 25.3 million and $ 10.4 million of our total overhead costs to leasing and development , respectively , for consolidated properties during 2011 , compared to capitalizing $ 23.5 million and $ 8.5 million of such costs , respectively , for 2010 . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) and 19.1% ( 19.1 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs for 2011 and 2010 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the g&a expense in 2011?\nAnswer: 43.1\nQuestion: what was it in 2010?\nAnswer: 41.3\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.8"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9477
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n35% ( 35 % ) due primarily to certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no u.s . taxes are provided because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of september 24 , 2011 , the company had deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences , tax losses , and tax credits of $ 3.2 billion , and deferred tax liabilities of $ 9.2 billion . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences , will be sufficient to fully recover the deferred tax assets . the company will continue to evaluate the realizability of deferred tax assets quarterly by assessing the need for and amount of a valuation allowance . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . all irs audit issues for years prior to 2004 have been resolved . in addition , the company is subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities . management believes that adequate provisions have been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 81570</td><td>$ 51011</td><td>$ 33992</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 5369</td><td>$ 5510</td><td>$ 3361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>$ 776</td><td>$ 1051</td><td>$ 455</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 17018</td><td>$ 20956</td><td>$ 20049</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 37529</td><td>$ 18595</td><td>$ 10159</td></tr></table> cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities increased $ 30.6 billion or 60% ( 60 % ) during 2011 . the principal components of this net increase was the cash generated by operating activities of $ 37.5 billion , which was partially offset by payments for acquisition of property , plant and equipment of $ 4.3 billion , payments for acquisition of intangible assets of $ 3.2 billion and payments made in connection with business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 244 million . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly rated securities and its policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer . the company 2019s investment policy requires investments to generally be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss . as of september 24 , 2011 and september 25 , 2010 , $ 54.3 billion and $ 30.8 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . capital assets the company 2019s capital expenditures were $ 4.6 billion during 2011 , consisting of approximately $ 614 million for retail store facilities and $ 4.0 billion for other capital expenditures , including product tooling and manufacturing .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the annual operating cash flow from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: 18934.0\nQuestion: what is the percentage change?\nAnswer: 1.01823\nQuestion: what about the annual operating cash flow from 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: 8436.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.8304"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1058
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncgmhi also has substantial borrowing arrangements consisting of facilities that cgmhi has been advised are available , but where no contractual lending obligation exists . these arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting cgmhi 2019s short-term requirements . the company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies . it uses derivative contracts , primarily interest rate swaps , to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt . the maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged . in addition , the company uses other derivative contracts to manage the foreign exchange impact of certain debt issuances . at december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s overall weighted average interest rate for long-term debt was 3.83% ( 3.83 % ) on a contractual basis and 4.19% ( 4.19 % ) including the effects of derivative contracts . aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities are as follows : in millions of dollars 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>citigroup parent company</td><td>$ 13463</td><td>$ 17500</td><td>$ 19864</td><td>$ 21135</td><td>$ 17525</td><td>$ 102794</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other citigroup subsidiaries</td><td>55853</td><td>16198</td><td>18607</td><td>2718</td><td>4248</td><td>11691</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>citigroup global markets holdings inc .</td><td>1524</td><td>2352</td><td>1487</td><td>2893</td><td>392</td><td>11975</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>citigroup funding inc .</td><td>17632</td><td>5381</td><td>2154</td><td>1253</td><td>3790</td><td>7164</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 88472</td><td>$ 41431</td><td>$ 42112</td><td>$ 27999</td><td>$ 25955</td><td>$ 133624</td></tr></table> long-term debt at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 includes $ 24060 million and $ 23756 million , respectively , of junior subordinated debt . the company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of delaware . the trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of ( i ) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust ; ( ii ) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ( subordinated debentures ) of its parent ; and ( iii ) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto . upon approval from the federal reserve , citigroup has the right to redeem these securities . citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase ( i ) the 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xv before september 15 , 2056 , ( ii ) the 6.45% ( 6.45 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvi before december 31 , 2046 , ( iii ) the 6.35% ( 6.35 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvii before march 15 , 2057 , ( iv ) the 6.829% ( 6.829 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xviii before june 28 , 2047 , ( v ) the 7.250% ( 7.250 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xix before august 15 , 2047 , ( vi ) the 7.875% ( 7.875 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xx before december 15 , 2067 , and ( vii ) the 8.300% ( 8.300 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xxi before december 21 , 2067 unless certain conditions , described in exhibit 4.03 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on september 18 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 28 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on march 8 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on july 2 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on august 17 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 27 , 2007 , and in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on december 21 , 2007 , respectively , are met . these agreements are for the benefit of the holders of citigroup 2019s 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2034 . citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts . these subsidiary trusts have no assets , operations , revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance , administration and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts 2019 common securities . these subsidiary trusts 2019 obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by citigroup. .\nQuestion: in 2009, what percentage of the total due aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ), including trust preferred securities, were related to citigroup funding inc .?\nAnswer: 0.19929\nQuestion: and three years later, in 2012, what were those total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "27999.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4608
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbhge 2018 form 10-k | 85 it is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months due to expiring statutes , audit activity , tax payments , and competent authority proceedings related to transfer pricing or final decisions in matters that are the subject of litigation in various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate . at december 31 , 2018 , we had approximately $ 96 million of tax liabilities , net of $ 1 million of tax assets , related to uncertain tax positions , each of which are individually insignificant , and each of which are reasonably possible of being settled within the next twelve months . we conduct business in more than 120 countries and are subject to income taxes in most taxing jurisdictions in which we operate . all internal revenue service examinations have been completed and closed through year end 2015 for the most significant u.s . returns . we believe there are no other jurisdictions in which the outcome of unresolved issues or claims is likely to be material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . we further believe that we have made adequate provision for all income tax uncertainties . note 13 . stock-based compensation in july 2017 , we adopted the bhge 2017 long-term incentive plan ( lti plan ) under which we may grant stock options and other equity-based awards to employees and non-employee directors providing services to the company and our subsidiaries . a total of up to 57.4 million shares of class a common stock are authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the lti plan over its term which expires on the date of the annual meeting of the company in 2027 . a total of 46.2 million shares of class a common stock are available for issuance as of december 31 , 2018 . stock-based compensation cost was $ 121 million and $ 37 million in 2018 and 2017 , respectively . stock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant based on the calculated fair value of the award and is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the equity grant . the compensation cost is determined based on awards ultimately expected to vest ; therefore , we have reduced the cost for estimated forfeitures based on historical forfeiture rates . forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised , if necessary , in subsequent periods to reflect actual forfeitures . there were no stock-based compensation costs capitalized as the amounts were not material . stock options we may grant stock options to our officers , directors and key employees . stock options generally vest in equal amounts over a three-year vesting period provided that the employee has remained continuously employed by the company through such vesting date . the fair value of each stock option granted is estimated using the black- scholes option pricing model . the following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model for options granted under the lti plan . the expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding . the expected life is based on a simple average of the vesting term and original contractual term of the awards . the expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our five main competitors over a six year period . the risk-free interest rate is based on the observed u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time the options were granted . the dividend yield is based on a five year history of dividend payouts in baker hughes. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>33.7% ( 33.7 % )</td><td>36.4% ( 36.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average fair value per share at grant date</td><td>$ 10.34</td><td>$ 12.32</td></tr></table> baker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements .\nQuestion: what is the net change in fair value per share from 2017 to 2018?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-1.98"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9611
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( a ) the net change in the total valuation allowance for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 was an increase of $ 12 million and an increase of $ 26 million , respectively . deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under the captions deferred charges and other assets and deferred income taxes . there was a decrease in deferred income tax assets principally relating to the utilization of u.s . federal alternative minimum tax credits as permitted under tax reform . deferred tax liabilities increased primarily due to the tax deferral of the book gain recognized on the transfer of the north american consumer packaging business to a subsidiary of graphic packaging holding company . of the $ 1.5 billion of deferred tax liabilities for forestlands , related installment sales , and investment in subsidiary , $ 884 million is attributable to an investment in subsidiary and relates to a 2006 international paper installment sale of forestlands and $ 538 million is attributable to a 2007 temple-inland installment sale of forestlands ( see note 14 ) . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ -188 ( 188 )</td><td>$ -98 ( 98 )</td><td>$ -150 ( 150 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( additions ) reductions based on tax positions related to current year</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-54 ( 54 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>( additions ) for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-37 ( 37 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expiration of statutes oflimitations</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>currency translation adjustment</td><td>3</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ -220 ( 220 )</td><td>$ -188 ( 188 )</td><td>$ -98 ( 98 )</td></tr></table> if the company were to prevail on the unrecognized tax benefits recorded , substantially all of the balances at december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 would benefit the effective tax rate . the company accrues interest on unrecognized tax benefits as a component of interest expense . penalties , if incurred , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . the company had approximately $ 21 million and $ 17 million accrued for the payment of estimated interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the major jurisdictions where the company files income tax returns are the united states , brazil , france , poland and russia . generally , tax years 2006 through 2017 remain open and subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities . the company frequently faces challenges regarding the amount of taxes due . these challenges include positions taken by the company related to the timing , nature , and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions . pending audit settlements and the expiration of statute of limitations could reduce the uncertain tax positions by $ 30 million during the next twelve months . the brazilian federal revenue service has challenged the deductibility of goodwill amortization generated in a 2007 acquisition by international paper do brasil ltda. , a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company . the company received assessments for the tax years 2007-2015 totaling approximately $ 150 million in tax , and $ 380 million in interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2018 ( adjusted for variation in currency exchange rates ) . after a previous favorable ruling challenging the basis for these assessments , we received an unfavorable decision in october 2018 from the brazilian administrative council of tax appeals . the company intends to further appeal the matter in the brazilian federal courts in 2019 ; however , this tax litigation matter may take many years to resolve . the company believes that it has appropriately evaluated the transaction underlying these assessments , and has concluded based on brazilian tax law , that its tax position would be sustained . the company intends to vigorously defend its position against the current assessments and any similar assessments that may be issued for tax years subsequent to 2015 . international paper uses the flow-through method to account for investment tax credits earned on eligible open-loop biomass facilities and combined heat and power system expenditures . under this method , the investment tax credits are recognized as a reduction to income tax expense in the year they are earned rather than a reduction in the asset basis . the company recorded a tax benefit of $ 6 million during 2018 and recorded a tax benefit of $ 68 million during 2017 related to investment tax credits earned in tax years 2013-2017. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits between 2016 and 2017?\nAnswer: 90.0\nQuestion: what was the percentage change during this time?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.91837"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5121
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe also record an inventory obsolescence reserve , which represents the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value , based on various product sales projections . this reserve is calcu- lated using an estimated obsolescence percentage applied to the inventory based on age , historical trends and requirements to support forecasted sales . in addition , and as necessary , we may establish specific reserves for future known or anticipated events . pension and other post-retirement benefit costs we offer the following benefits to some or all of our employees : a domestic trust-based noncontributory qual- ified defined benefit pension plan ( 201cu.s . qualified plan 201d ) and an unfunded , non-qualified domestic noncon- tributory pension plan to provide benefits in excess of statutory limitations ( collectively with the u.s . qualified plan , the 201cdomestic plans 201d ) ; a domestic contributory defined contribution plan ; international pension plans , which vary by country , consisting of both defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans ; deferred compensation arrangements ; and certain other post- retirement benefit plans . the amounts needed to fund future payouts under our defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans are subject to numerous assumptions and variables . cer- tain significant variables require us to make assumptions that are within our control such as an anticipated discount rate , expected rate of return on plan assets and future compensation levels . we evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial advisors and select assumptions that we believe reflect the economics underlying our pension and post-retirement obligations . while we believe these assumptions are within accepted industry ranges , an increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control could have a direct impact on reported net earnings . the discount rate for each plan used for determining future net periodic benefit cost is based on a review of highly rated long-term bonds . for fiscal 2013 , we used a discount rate for our domestic plans of 3.90% ( 3.90 % ) and vary- ing rates on our international plans of between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) . the discount rate for our domestic plans is based on a bond portfolio that includes only long-term bonds with an aa rating , or equivalent , from a major rating agency . as of june 30 , 2013 , we used an above-mean yield curve , rather than the broad-based yield curve we used before , because we believe it represents a better estimate of an effective settlement rate of the obligation , and the timing and amount of cash flows related to the bonds included in this portfolio are expected to match the estimated defined benefit payment streams of our domestic plans . the benefit obligation of our domestic plans would have been higher by approximately $ 34 mil- lion at june 30 , 2013 had we not used the above-mean yield curve . for our international plans , the discount rate in a particular country was principally determined based on a yield curve constructed from high quality corporate bonds in each country , with the resulting portfolio having a duration matching that particular plan . for fiscal 2013 , we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for our u.s . qualified plan and varying rates of between 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for our international plans . in determining the long-term rate of return for a plan , we consider the historical rates of return , the nature of the plan 2019s investments and an expectation for the plan 2019s investment strategies . see 201cnote 12 2014 pension , deferred compensation and post-retirement benefit plans 201d of notes to consolidated financial statements for details regarding the nature of our pension and post-retirement plan invest- ments . the difference between actual and expected return on plan assets is reported as a component of accu- mulated other comprehensive income . those gains/losses that are subject to amortization over future periods will be recognized as a component of the net periodic benefit cost in such future periods . for fiscal 2013 , our pension plans had actual return on assets of approximately $ 74 million as compared with expected return on assets of approximately $ 64 million . the resulting net deferred gain of approximately $ 10 million , when combined with gains and losses from previous years , will be amortized over periods ranging from approximately 7 to 22 years . the actual return on plan assets from our international pen- sion plans exceeded expectations , primarily reflecting a strong performance from fixed income and equity invest- ments . the lower than expected return on assets from our u.s . qualified plan was primarily due to weakness in our fixed income investments , partially offset by our strong equity returns . a 25 basis-point change in the discount rate or the expected rate of return on plan assets would have had the following effect on fiscal 2013 pension expense : 25 basis-point 25 basis-point increase decrease ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>25 basis-point increase</td><td>25 basis-point decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discount rate</td><td>$ -3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>$ 3.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected return on assets</td><td>$ -2.5 ( 2.5 )</td><td>$ 2.7</td></tr></table> our post-retirement plans are comprised of health care plans that could be impacted by health care cost trend rates , which may have a significant effect on the amounts the est{e lauder companies inc . 115 .\nQuestion: what was the actual return on assets in 2013?\nAnswer: 74.0\nQuestion: and the expected return on assets during that time?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "64.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1606
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table summarizes the total contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 324590</td><td>$ 558368</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liquidity asset purchase agreements</td><td>28800</td><td>35339</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unfunded commitments to extend credit</td><td>20981</td><td>17533</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>6061</td><td>4711</td></tr></table> approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of the commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . securities finance : on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . we generally indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . in this regard , we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 333.07 billion and $ 572.93 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , presented in the table above . the collateral held by us is invested on behalf of our customers . in certain cases , the collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the customer against loss of the principal invested . we require the repurchase agreement counterparty to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . of the collateral of $ 333.07 billion at december 31 , 2008 and $ 572.93 billion at december 31 , 2007 referenced above , $ 68.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 and $ 106.13 billion at december 31 , 2007 was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements . we held , as agent , cash and securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 71.87 billion and $ 111.02 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . asset-backed commercial paper program : in the normal course of our business , we provide liquidity and credit enhancement to an asset-backed commercial paper program sponsored and administered by us , described in note 12 . the commercial paper issuances and commitments of the commercial paper conduits to provide funding are supported by liquidity asset purchase agreements and back-up liquidity lines of credit , the majority of which are provided by us . in addition , we provide direct credit support to the conduits in the form of standby letters of credit . our commitments under liquidity asset purchase agreements and back-up lines of credit totaled $ 23.59 billion at december 31 , 2008 , and are included in the preceding table . our commitments under standby letters of credit totaled $ 1.00 billion at december 31 , 2008 , and are also included in the preceding table . legal proceedings : several customers have filed litigation claims against us , some of which are putative class actions purportedly on behalf of customers invested in certain of state street global advisors 2019 , or ssga 2019s , active fixed-income strategies . these claims related to investment losses in one or more of ssga 2019s strategies that included sub-prime investments . in 2007 , we established a reserve of approximately $ 625 million to address legal exposure associated with the under-performance of certain active fixed-income strategies managed by ssga and customer concerns as to whether the execution of these strategies was consistent with the customers 2019 investment intent . these strategies were adversely impacted by exposure to , and the lack of liquidity in .\nQuestion: what was the value of standby letters of credit in 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "6061.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA596
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 4273</td><td>$ 6392</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 136</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .\nQuestion: how much do the mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) on the citigroup 2019s ( msrs ) consolidated balance sheet in 2008 represent in relation to the 2007 ones?\nAnswer: 0.67857\nQuestion: and what was the fair value of that msr in 2008?\nAnswer: 4273.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2007?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "6392.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4026
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nput options we currently have outstanding put option agreements with other shareholders of our air products san fu company , ltd . and indura s.a . subsidiaries . the put options give the shareholders the right to sell stock in the subsidiaries based on pricing terms in the agreements . refer to note 17 , commitments and contingencies , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . due to the uncertainty of whether these options would be exercised and the related timing , we excluded the potential payments from the contractual obligations table . pension benefits we sponsor defined benefit pension plans that cover a substantial portion of our worldwide employees . the principal defined benefit pension plans 2014the u.s . salaried pension plan and the u.k . pension plan 2014were closed to new participants in 2005 and were replaced with defined contribution plans . over the long run , the shift to defined contribution plans is expected to reduce volatility of both plan expense and contributions . for 2013 , the fair market value of pension plan assets for our defined benefit plans as of the measurement date increased to $ 3800.8 from $ 3239.1 in 2012 . the projected benefit obligation for these plans as of the measurement date was $ 4394.0 and $ 4486.5 in 2013 and 2012 , respectively . refer to note 16 , retirement benefits , to the consolidated financial statements for comprehensive and detailed disclosures on our postretirement benefits . pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense</td><td>$ 169.7</td><td>$ 120.4</td><td>$ 114.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above )</td><td>19.8</td><td>8.2</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td><td>8.0% ( 8.0 % )</td><td>8.0% ( 8.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td><td>3.9% ( 3.9 % )</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td></tr></table> 2013 vs . 2012 the increase in pension expense , excluding special items , was primarily attributable to the 100 bp decrease in weighted average discount rate , resulting in higher amortization of actuarial losses . the increase was partially offset by a higher expected return on plan assets and contributions in 2013 . special items of $ 19.8 primarily included $ 12.4 for pension settlement losses and $ 6.9 for special termination benefits relating to the 2013 business restructuring and cost reduction plan . 2012 vs . 2011 pension expense in 2012 , excluding special items , was comparable to 2011 expense as a result of no change in the weighted average discount rate from year to year . 2014 outlook pension expense is estimated to be approximately $ 140 to $ 145 , excluding special items , in 2014 , a decrease of $ 5 to $ 10 from 2013 , resulting primarily from an increase in discount rates , partially offset by unfavorable impacts associated with changes in mortality and inflation assumptions . pension settlement losses of $ 10 to $ 25 are expected , dependent on the timing of retirements . in 2014 , pension expense will include approximately $ 118 for amortization of actuarial losses compared to $ 143 in 2013 . net actuarial gains of $ 370.4 were recognized in 2013 , resulting primarily from an approximately 65 bp increase in the weighted average discount rate as well as actual asset returns above expected returns . actuarial gains/losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets , different from expected returns , would impact the actuarial gains/losses and resulting amortization in years beyond 2014 . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2013 and 2012 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 300.8 and $ 76.4 , respectively . contributions for 2013 include voluntary contributions for u.s . plans of $ 220.0. .\nQuestion: what is the balance of special terminations settlements and curtailments in 2013?\nAnswer: 19.8\nQuestion: what about in 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "8.2"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4266
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 15 . exhibits , financial statement schedules . ( continued ) kinder morgan , inc . form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>kinder morgan liquids terminals llc-n.j . development revenue bonds due january 15 2018 kinder morgan columbus llc-5.50% ( llc-5.50 % ) ms development revenue note due september 1 2022</td><td>25.0 8.2</td><td>25.0 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kinder morgan operating l.p . 201cb 201d-jackson-union cos . il revenue bonds due april 1 2024</td><td>23.7</td><td>23.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international marine terminals-plaquemines la revenue bonds due march 15 2025</td><td>40.0</td><td>40.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other miscellaneous subsidiary debt</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unamortized debt discount on long-term debt</td><td>-20.3 ( 20.3 )</td><td>-21.2 ( 21.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-1263.3 ( 1263.3 )</td><td>-596.6 ( 596.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt 2013 kmp</td><td>$ 10282.8</td><td>$ 10007.5</td></tr></table> ____________ ( a ) as a result of the implementation of asu 2009-17 , effective january 1 , 2010 , we ( i ) include the transactions and balances of our business trust , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , in our consolidated financial statements and ( ii ) no longer include our junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued to the capital trusts ( see note 18 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d ) . ( b ) kmp issued its $ 500 million in principal amount of 9.00% ( 9.00 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2019 in december 2008 . each holder of the notes has the right to require kmp to repurchase all or a portion of the notes owned by such holder on february 1 , 2012 at a purchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes tendered by the holder plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the repurchase date . on and after february 1 , 2012 , interest will cease to accrue on the notes tendered for repayment . a holder 2019s exercise of the repurchase option is irrevocable . kinder morgan kansas , inc . the 2028 and 2098 debentures and the 2012 and 2015 senior notes are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . the 2027 debentures are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option after november 1 , 2004 at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . on september 2 , 2010 , kinder morgan kansas , inc . paid the remaining $ 1.1 million principal balance outstanding on kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) series debentures , due 2013 . kinder morgan finance company , llc on december 20 , 2010 , kinder morgan finance company , llc , a wholly owned subsidiary of kinder morgan kansas , inc. , completed a public offering of senior notes . it issued a total of $ 750 million in principal amount of 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) senior notes due january 15 , 2018 . net proceeds received from the issuance of the notes , after underwriting discounts and commissions , were $ 744.2 million , which were used to retire the principal amount of the 5.35% ( 5.35 % ) senior notes that matured on january 5 , 2011 . the 2011 , 2016 , 2018 and 2036 senior notes issued by kinder morgan finance company , llc are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . each series of these notes is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by kinder morgan kansas , inc . on a senior unsecured basis as to principal , interest and any additional amounts required to be paid as a result of any withholding or deduction for canadian taxes . capital trust securities kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s business trusts , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , are obligated for $ 12.7 million of 8.56% ( 8.56 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2027 and $ 14.4 million of 7.63% ( 7.63 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2028 , respectively , which it guarantees . the 2028 securities are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices as defined in the associated prospectus . the 2027 securities are redeemable in whole or in part at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option and at any time in certain limited circumstances upon the occurrence of certain events and at prices , all defined in the associated prospectus supplements . upon redemption by kinder morgan kansas , inc . or at maturity of the junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures , it must use the proceeds to make redemptions of the capital trust securities on a pro rata basis. .\nQuestion: what was the amount of the current maturities of long-term debt?\nAnswer: -1263.3\nQuestion: and what was the total long-term debt for the first column?\nAnswer: 10282.8\nQuestion: what was, then, that amount as a portion of this long-term debt?\nAnswer: -0.12286\nQuestion: and what is that in percentage?\nAnswer: -1263.3\nQuestion: and concerning that amount and the total long-term debt, what was the combined total of both, in millions?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "11546.1"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5942
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotional amounts and derivative receivables marked to market ( 201cmtm 201d ) notional amounts ( a ) derivative receivables mtm as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31 , ( in billions )</td><td>as of december 31 , 2005</td><td>as of december 31 , 2004</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 38493</td><td>$ 37022</td><td>$ 30</td><td>$ 46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>2136</td><td>1886</td><td>3</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>equity</td><td>458</td><td>434</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>2241</td><td>1071</td><td>4</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>265</td><td>101</td><td>7</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 43593</td><td>$ 40514</td><td>50</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>collateral held againstderivative receivables</td><td>na</td><td>na</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>exposure net of collateral</td><td>na</td><td>na</td><td>$ 44 ( b )</td><td>$ 57 ( c )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the notional amounts represent the gross sum of long and short third-party notional derivative contracts , excluding written options and foreign exchange spot contracts , which significantly exceed the possible credit losses that could arise from such transactions . for most derivative transactions , the notional principal amount does not change hands ; it is used simply as a reference to calculate payments . ( b ) the firm held $ 33 billion of collateral against derivative receivables as of december 31 , 2005 , consisting of $ 27 billion in net cash received under credit support annexes to legally enforceable master netting agreements , and $ 6 billion of other liquid securities collateral . the benefit of the $ 27 billion is reflected within the $ 50 billion of derivative receivables mtm . excluded from the $ 33 billion of collateral is $ 10 billion of collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions ; this collateral secures exposure that could arise in the derivatives portfolio should the mtm of the client 2019s transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . also excluded are credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and surety receivables . ( c ) the firm held $ 41 billion of collateral against derivative receivables as of december 31 , 2004 , consisting of $ 32 billion in net cash received under credit support annexes to legally enforceable master netting agreements , and $ 9 billion of other liquid securities collateral . the benefit of the $ 32 billion is reflected within the $ 66 billion of derivative receivables mtm . excluded from the $ 41 billion of collateral is $ 10 billion of collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions ; this collateral secures exposure that could arise in the derivatives portfolio should the mtm of the client 2019s transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . also excluded are credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and surety receivables . management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co . 68 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2005 annual report 1 year 2 years 5 years 10 years mdp avgavgdredre exposure profile of derivatives measures december 31 , 2005 ( in billions ) the following table summarizes the aggregate notional amounts and the reported derivative receivables ( i.e. , the mtm or fair value of the derivative contracts after taking into account the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements ) at each of the dates indicated : the mtm of derivative receivables contracts represents the cost to replace the contracts at current market rates should the counterparty default . when jpmorgan chase has more than one transaction outstanding with a counter- party , and a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists with that counterparty , the netted mtm exposure , less collateral held , represents , in the firm 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net mtm value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak exposure to a counterparty is an extreme measure of exposure calculated at a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . however , the total potential future credit risk embedded in the firm 2019s derivatives portfolio is not the simple sum of all peak client credit risks . this is because , at the portfolio level , credit risk is reduced by the fact that when offsetting transactions are done with separate counter- parties , only one of the two trades can generate a credit loss , even if both counterparties were to default simultaneously . the firm refers to this effect as market diversification , and the market-diversified peak ( 201cmdp 201d ) measure is a portfolio aggregation of counterparty peak measures , representing the maximum losses at the 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level that would occur if all coun- terparties defaulted under any one given market scenario and time frame . derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) exposure is a measure that expresses the riskiness of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the riskiness of loan exposures . the measurement is done by equating the unexpected loss in a derivative counterparty exposure ( which takes into consideration both the loss volatility and the credit rating of the counterparty ) with the unexpected loss in a loan exposure ( which takes into consideration only the credit rating of the counterparty ) . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is the primary measure used by the firm for credit approval of derivative transactions . finally , average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) is a measure of the expected mtm value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the credit valuation adjustment ( 201ccva 201d ) , as further described below . average exposure was $ 36 billion and $ 38 billion at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables mtm net of other highly liquid collateral of $ 44 billion and $ 57 billion at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the graph below shows exposure profiles to derivatives over the next 10 years as calculated by the mdp , dre and avg metrics . all three measures generally show declining exposure after the first year , if no new trades were added to the portfolio. .\nQuestion: what was the change in value in interest rate from 2004 to 2005?\nAnswer: 1471.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2004?\nAnswer: 37022.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.03973"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10789
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmasco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .\nQuestion: what is the balance in company 2019s warranty liability at the end of 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "118.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA112
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naffiliated company . the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc . the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company . during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india . cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment . in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million . tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen . the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million . with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 . approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no . 142 and ceased amortization of goodwill . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million . the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 . songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas . the sale is expected to close in early 2003 . see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction . the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 6147</td><td>$ 6241</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>695</td><td>1717</td><td>1989</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>229</td><td>650</td><td>859</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>1097</td><td>3700</td><td>2423</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>6751</td><td>14942</td><td>13080</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>1418</td><td>3510</td><td>3370</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>3349</td><td>8297</td><td>5927</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>3081</td><td>6835</td><td>6206</td></tr></table> in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 . the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively . the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in revenue between 2000 and 2001?\nAnswer: -94.0\nQuestion: and the value for 2000 specifically?\nAnswer: 6241.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-0.01506"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10933
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits in 2013?\nAnswer: 85.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2012?\nAnswer: 82.0\nQuestion: what is the difference?\nAnswer: 3.0\nQuestion: what was the 2012 value?\nAnswer: 82.0\nQuestion: what is the net change divided by that value?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.03659"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9041
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements sale and leaseback transactions waterford 3 lease obligations in 1989 , entergy louisiana sold and leased back 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) of its interest in waterford 3 for the aggregate sum of $ 353.6 million . the lease has an approximate term of 28 years . the lessors financed the sale-leaseback through the issuance of waterford 3 secured lease obligation bonds . the lease payments made by entergy louisiana are sufficient to service the debt . in 1994 , entergy louisiana did not exercise its option to repurchase the 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) interest in waterford 3 . as a result , entergy louisiana issued $ 208.2 million of non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds as collateral for the equity portion of certain amounts payable under the lease . in 1997 , the lessors refinanced the outstanding bonds used to finance the purchase of waterford 3 at lower interest rates , which reduced the annual lease payments . upon the occurrence of certain events , entergy louisiana may be obligated to assume the outstanding bonds used to finance the purchase of the unit and to pay an amount sufficient to withdraw from the lease transaction . such events include lease events of default , events of loss , deemed loss events , or certain adverse \"financial events.\" \"financial events\" include , among other things , failure by entergy louisiana , following the expiration of any applicable grace or cure period , to maintain ( i ) total equity capital ( including preferred stock ) at least equal to 30% ( 30 % ) of adjusted capitalization , or ( ii ) a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.50 computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2003 , entergy louisiana's total equity capital ( including preferred stock ) was 49.82% ( 49.82 % ) of adjusted capitalization and its fixed charge coverage ratio for 2003 was 4.06 . as of december 31 , 2003 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 31739</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>14554</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>18262</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>18754</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2008</td><td>22606</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>366514</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>472429</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>209895</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 262534</td></tr></table> grand gulf 1 lease obligations in december 1988 , system energy sold 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of its undivided ownership interest in grand gulf 1 for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . subsequently , system energy leased back its interest in the unit for a term of 26-1/2 years . system energy has the option of terminating the lease and repurchasing the 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) interest in the unit at certain intervals during the lease . furthermore , at the end of the lease term , system energy has the option of renewing the lease or repurchasing the 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) interest in grand gulf 1 . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2003, what portion of the total future minimum lease payments for entergy louisiana was due to the interest amount?\nAnswer: 0.44429\nQuestion: and what portion of it was from the payments due in 2004?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.06718"
}
] |
CONVFINQA382
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\no 2019 r e i l l y a u t o m o t i v e 2 0 0 6 a n n u a l r e p o r t p a g e 38 $ 11080000 , in the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 , was $ 7702000 and the weighted-average period of time over which this cost will be recognized is 3.3 years . employee stock purchase plan the company 2019s employee stock purchase plan permits all eligible employees to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value . participants may authorize the company to withhold up to 5% ( 5 % ) of their annual salary to participate in the plan . the stock purchase plan authorizes up to 2600000 shares to be granted . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company issued 165306 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.36 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company issued 161903 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.57 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company issued 187754 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 20.85 per share . sfas no . 123r requires compensation expense to be recognized based on the discount between the grant date fair value and the employee purchase price for shares sold to employees . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 799000 of compensation cost related to employee share purchases and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 295000 . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 400000 shares were reserved for future issuance . other employee benefit plans the company sponsors a contributory profit sharing and savings plan that covers substantially all employees who are at least 21 years of age and have at least six months of service . the company has agreed to make matching contributions equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 2% ( 2 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed and 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 4% ( 4 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed . the company also makes additional discretionary profit sharing contributions to the plan on an annual basis as determined by the board of directors . the company 2019s matching and profit sharing contributions under this plan are funded in the form of shares of the company 2019s common stock . a total of 4200000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 6429000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2372000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company recorded $ 6606000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2444000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company recorded $ 5278000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 1969000 . the compensation cost recorded in 2006 includes matching contributions made in 2006 and profit sharing contributions accrued in 2006 to be funded with issuance of shares of common stock in 2007 . the company issued 204000 shares in 2006 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 34.34 . the company issued 210461 shares in 2005 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 25.79 . the company issued 238828 shares in 2004 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 19.36 . a portion of these shares related to profit sharing contributions accrued in prior periods . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 1061000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . the company has in effect a performance incentive plan for the company 2019s senior management under which the company awards shares of restricted stock that vest equally over a three-year period and are held in escrow until such vesting has occurred . shares are forfeited when an employee ceases employment . a total of 800000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . shares awarded under this plan are valued based on the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant and compensation cost is recorded over the vesting period . the company recorded $ 416000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2006 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 154000 . the company recorded $ 289000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 107000 . the company recorded $ 248000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2004 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 93000 . the total fair value of shares vested ( at vest date ) for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 were $ 503000 , $ 524000 and $ 335000 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 was $ 536000 . the company awarded 18698 shares under this plan in 2006 with an average grant date fair value of $ 33.12 . the company awarded 14986 shares under this plan in 2005 with an average grant date fair value of $ 25.41 . the company awarded 15834 shares under this plan in 2004 with an average grant date fair value of $ 19.05 . compensation cost for shares awarded in 2006 will be recognized over the three-year vesting period . changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the year ended december 31 , 2006 were as follows : weighted- average grant date shares fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2005</td><td>15052</td><td>$ 22.68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted during the period</td><td>18698</td><td>33.12</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested during the period</td><td>-15685 ( 15685 )</td><td>26.49</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited during the period</td><td>-1774 ( 1774 )</td><td>27.94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2006</td><td>16291</td><td>$ 30.80</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 659000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( cont inued ) .\nQuestion: what were the number of shares issued in 2015 times the average share price per share?\nAnswer: 4463665.71\nQuestion: what is that value simplified?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "4.46367"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2691
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 123 , as amended by sfas no . 148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 . the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>approximate risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.23% ( 4.23 % )</td><td>4.00% ( 4.00 % )</td><td>4.53% ( 4.53 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan )</td><td>80.6% ( 80.6 % )</td><td>86.6% ( 86.6 % )</td><td>92.3% ( 92.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans )</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) . the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico . the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure . during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 . no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 . ( see note 10. ) .\nQuestion: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?\nAnswer: 7.05\nQuestion: and in 2003?\nAnswer: 6.32\nQuestion: so what was the change in this value between these years?\nAnswer: 0.73\nQuestion: and the value for 2003 again?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "6.32"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7532
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nexpected term 2014 the company uses historical employee exercise and option expiration data to estimate the expected term assumption for the black-scholes grant-date valuation . the company believes that this historical data is currently the best estimate of the expected term of a new option , and that generally its employees exhibit similar exercise behavior . risk-free interest rate 2014 the yield on zero-coupon u.s . treasury securities for a period that is commensurate with the expected term assumption is used as the risk-free interest rate . expected dividend yield 2014 expected dividend yield is calculated by annualizing the cash dividend declared by the company 2019s board of directors for the current quarter and dividing that result by the closing stock price on the date of grant . until such time as the company 2019s board of directors declares a cash dividend for an amount that is different from the current quarter 2019s cash dividend , the current dividend will be used in deriving this assumption . cash dividends are not paid on options , restricted stock or restricted stock units . in connection with the acquisition , the company granted restricted stock awards to replace outstanding restricted stock awards of linear employees . these restricted stock awards entitle recipients to voting and nonforfeitable dividend rights from the date of grant . stock-based compensation expensexp p the amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized during a period is based on the value of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest . forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised , if necessary , in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates . the term 201cforfeitures 201d is distinct from 201ccancellations 201d or 201cexpirations 201d and represents only the unvested portion of the surrendered stock-based award . based on an analysis of its historical forfeitures , the company has applied an annual forfeitureff rate of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) to all unvested stock-based awards as of november 2 , 2019 . this analysis will be re-evaluated quarterly and the forfeiture rate will be adjusted as necessary . ultimately , the actual expense recognized over the vesting period will only be for those awards that vest . total stock-based compensation expense recognized is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>$ 20628</td><td>$ 18733</td><td>$ 12569</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>research and development</td><td>75305</td><td>81444</td><td>51258</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>selling marketing general and administrative</td><td>51829</td><td>50988</td><td>40361</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>special charges</td><td>2538</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total stock-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 150300</td><td>$ 151165</td><td>$ 104188</td></tr></table> as of november 2 , 2019 and november 3 , 2018 , the company capitalized $ 6.8 million and $ 7.1 million , respectively , of stock-based compensation in inventory . additional paid-in-capital ( apic ) pp poolp p ( ) the company adopted asu 2016-09 during fiscal 2018 . asu 2016-09 eliminated the apic pool and requires that excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies be recorded in the income statement when awards are settled . as a result of this adoption the company recorded total excess tax benefits of $ 28.7 million and $ 26.2 million in fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018 , respectively , from its stock-based compensation payments within income tax expense in its consolidated statements of income . for fiscal 2017 , the apic pool represented the excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation that were available to absorb future tax deficiencies . if the amount of future tax deficiencies was greater than the available apic pool , the company recorded the excess as income tax expense in its consolidated statements of income . for fiscal 2017 , the company had a sufficient apic pool to cover any tax deficiencies recorded and as a result , these deficiencies did not affect its results of operations . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the cost of sales in 2019?\nAnswer: 20628.0\nQuestion: what was the cost in 2018?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "18733.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1811
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndevon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2011</td><td>403</td><td>379</td><td>782</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>134</td><td>68</td><td>202</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>9</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-90 ( 90 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2012 , devon had 840 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 7 percent increase as compared to 2011 and represents 28 percent of its total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 203 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 90 mmboe , or 12 percent , of the 2011 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.3 billion for 2012 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 16 mmboe primarily due to its evaluation of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which it does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas at carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2012 largely related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 429 mmboe and 367 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2012 - reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 - reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . 2010 - reserves increased 72 mmboe due to higher gas prices , partially offset by the effect of higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . of the 72 mmboe price revisions , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 22 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions noted in the proved undeveloped reserves discussion above . total revisions other than price for 2010 primarily related to devon 2019s drilling and development in the barnett shale. .\nQuestion: what were proved undeveloped reserved in canada for 2011?\nAnswer: 379.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2012?\nAnswer: 433.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "812.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3711
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nas of september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $ 1.4 billion , of which $ 563 million , if recognized , would affect the company 2019s effective tax rate . as of september 25 , 2010 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $ 943 million , of which $ 404 million , if recognized , would affect the company 2019s effective tax rate . the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 943</td><td>971</td><td>$ 506</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>49</td><td>61</td><td>341</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>425</td><td>240</td><td>151</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>0</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td><td>$ 971</td></tr></table> the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 24 , 2011 and september 25 , 2010 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 261 million and $ 247 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2011 and 2009 of $ 14 million and $ 64 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1988 and 2001 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company does not believe it is reasonably possible that its unrecognized tax benefits would materially change in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . comprehensive income comprehensive income consists of two components , net income and other comprehensive income . other comprehensive income refers to revenue , expenses , gains and losses that under gaap are recorded as an element .\nQuestion: what is ending balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2011?\nAnswer: 1375.0\nQuestion: what about in 2010?\nAnswer: 943.0\nQuestion: what is the net change from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: 432.0\nQuestion: what about the net change from 2009 to 2010?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-28.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6562
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 132 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase primarily was attributable to approximately $ 115 million of higher operating profit on c-130 programs due to increased volume and the retirement of risks ; increased volume and risk retirements on f-16 programs of about $ 50 million and c-5 programs of approximately $ 20 million ; and about $ 70 million due to risk retirements on other aeronautics sustainment activities in 2011 . these increases partially were offset by a decline in operating profit of approximately $ 75 million on the f-22 program and f-35 development contract primarily due to lower volume and about $ 55 million on other programs , including f-35 lrip , primarily due to lower profit rate adjustments in 2011 compared to 2010 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 90 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 contracts and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to higher orders on f-35 contracts , which partially were offset by higher sales volume on the c-130 programs . trends we expect aeronautics will experience a mid single digit percentage range decline in net sales for 2013 as compared to 2012 . a decrease in net sales from a decline in f-16 and c-130j aircraft deliveries is expected to be partially offset by an increase in net sales volume on f-35 lrip contracts . operating profit is projected to decrease at a high single digit percentage range from 2012 levels due to the expected decline in net sales as well as changes in aircraft mix , resulting in a slight decline in operating margins between the years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides management services , integrated information technology solutions , and advanced technology systems and expertise across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continuing downturn in the federal information technology budgets and the impact of the continuing resolution that was effective on october 1 , 2012 , the start of the u.s . government 2019s fiscal year . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td><td>$ 9921</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>808</td><td>874</td><td>814</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td><td>8.2% ( 8.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td><td>9700</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford ; warfighter information network-tactical ( win-t ) ; command , control , battle management and communications ( c2bmc ) ; and transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) ) . partially offsetting the decreases were higher net sales of approximately $ 140 million from qtc , which was acquired early in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and about $ 65 million from increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and persistent threat detection system ( ptds ) operational support . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2012 decreased $ 66 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 50 million due to the favorable impact of the odin contract completion in 2011 ; about $ 25 million due to an increase in reserves for performance issues related to an international airborne surveillance system in 2012 ; and approximately $ 20 million due to lower volume on certain programs ( primarily c2bmc and win-t ) . partially offsetting the decreases was an increase in operating profit due to higher risk retirements of approximately $ 15 million from the twic program ; and about $ 10 million due to increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and ptds operational support . operating profit for the jtrs program was comparable as a decrease in volume was offset by a decrease in reserves . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 20 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .\nQuestion: what was the operating profit, in millions, in 2011?\nAnswer: 874.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2010, also in millions?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "814.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5111
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncommon stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the performance price of the disca stock from 2008 to 2013?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "538.56"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3559
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2014 , the company closed on thirteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate purchase price of $ 9 . assets acquired , principally plant , totaled $ 17 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 8 , including $ 5 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 2 . during 2013 , the company closed on fifteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate net purchase price of $ 24 . assets acquired , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 67 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 43 , including $ 26 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 13 . included in these totals was the company 2019s november 14 , 2013 acquisition of all of the capital stock of dale service corporation ( 201cdale 201d ) , a regulated wastewater utility company , for a total cash purchase price of $ 5 ( net of cash acquired of $ 7 ) , plus assumed liabilities . the dale acquisition was accounted for as a business combination ; accordingly , operating results from november 14 , 2013 were included in the company 2019s results of operations . the purchase price was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets based upon their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company 2019s regulatory practice was followed whereby property , plant and equipment ( rate base ) was considered fair value for business combination purposes . similarly , regulatory assets and liabilities acquired were recorded at book value and are subject to regulatory approval where applicable . the acquired debt was valued in a manner consistent with the company 2019s level 3 debt . see note 17 2014fair value of financial instruments . non-cash assets acquired in the dale acquisition , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 41 ; liabilities assumed totaled $ 36 , including debt assumed of $ 13 and contributions of $ 19 . divestitures in november 2014 , the company completed the sale of terratec , previously included in the market-based businesses . after post-close adjustments , net proceeds from the sale totaled $ 1 , and the company recorded a pretax loss on sale of $ 1 . the following table summarizes the operating results of discontinued operations presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenues</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 23</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total operating expenses net</td><td>19</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loss from discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provision ( benefit ) for income taxes</td><td>1</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>loss from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ -7 ( 7 )</td><td>$ -2 ( 2 )</td></tr></table> the provision for income taxes of discontinued operations includes the recognition of tax expense related to the difference between the tax basis and book basis of assets upon the sales of terratec that resulted in taxable gains , since an election was made under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the internal revenue code to treat the sales as asset sales . there were no assets or liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014. .\nQuestion: what was the change in operating profits from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: -10.0\nQuestion: and what were the total operating profits in 2013?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "23.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1183
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n15 . leases in january 1996 , the company entered into a lease agreement with an unrelated third party for a new corporate office facility , which the company occupied in february 1997 . in may 2004 , the company entered into the first amendment to this lease agreement , effective january 1 , 2004 . the lease was extended from an original period of 10 years , with an option for five additional years , to a period of 18 years from the inception date , with an option for five additional years . the company incurred lease rental expense related to this facility of $ 1.3 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the future minimum lease payments are $ 1.4 million per annum from january 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2014 . the future minimum lease payments from january 1 , 2015 through december 31 , 2019 will be determined based on prevailing market rental rates at the time of the extension , if elected . the amended lease also provided for the lessor to reimburse the company for up to $ 550000 in building refurbishments completed through march 31 , 2006 . these amounts have been recorded as a reduction of lease expense over the remaining term of the lease . the company has also entered into various noncancellable operating leases for equipment and office space . office space lease expense totaled $ 9.3 million , $ 6.3 million and $ 4.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases for office space in effect at december 31 , 2008 are $ 8.8 million in 2009 , $ 6.6 million in 2010 , $ 3.0 million in 2011 , $ 1.8 million in 2012 and $ 1.1 million in 2013 . 16 . royalty agreements the company has entered into various renewable , nonexclusive license agreements under which the company has been granted access to the licensor 2019s technology and the right to sell the technology in the company 2019s product line . royalties are payable to developers of the software at various rates and amounts , which generally are based upon unit sales or revenue . royalty fees are reported in cost of goods sold and were $ 6.3 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 3.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . 17 . geographic information revenue to external customers is attributed to individual countries based upon the location of the customer . revenue by geographic area is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2008</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2007</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 151688</td><td>$ 131777</td><td>$ 94282</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>germany</td><td>68390</td><td>50973</td><td>34567</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>japan</td><td>66960</td><td>50896</td><td>35391</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada</td><td>8033</td><td>4809</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other european</td><td>127246</td><td>108971</td><td>70184</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other international</td><td>56022</td><td>37914</td><td>24961</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total revenue</td><td>$ 478339</td><td>$ 385340</td><td>$ 263640</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the total future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases for office space for 2009 and 2010?\nAnswer: 15.4\nQuestion: what about if 2011 is added?\nAnswer: 18.4\nQuestion: and if 2012 is added?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "20.2"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8554
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nresearch and development we are committed to investing in highly productive research and development capabilities , particularly in electro-mechanical systems . our research and development ( \"r&d\" ) expenditures were approximately $ 48.3 million , $ 47.3 million and $ 45.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we concentrate on developing technology innovations that will deliver growth through the introduction of new products and solutions , and also on driving continuous improvements in product cost , quality , safety and sustainability . we manage our r&d team as a global group with an emphasis on a global collaborative approach to identify and develop new technologies and worldwide product platforms . we are organized on a regional basis to leverage expertise in local standards and configurations . in addition to regional engineering centers in each geographic region , we also operate a global engineering center of excellence in bangalore , india . seasonality our business experiences seasonality that varies by product line . because more construction and do-it-yourself projects occur during the second and third calendar quarters of each year in the northern hemisphere , our security product sales , typically , are higher in those quarters than in the first and fourth calendar quarters . however , our interflex business typically experiences higher sales in the fourth calendar quarter due to project timing . revenue by quarter for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>first quarter</td><td>second quarter</td><td>third quarter</td><td>fourth quarter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>22% ( 22 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>22% ( 22 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> employees we currently have approximately 10000 employees . environmental regulation we have a dedicated environmental program that is designed to reduce the utilization and generation of hazardous materials during the manufacturing process as well as to remediate identified environmental concerns . as to the latter , we are currently engaged in site investigations and remediation activities to address environmental cleanup from past operations at current and former production facilities . the company regularly evaluates its remediation programs and considers alternative remediation methods that are in addition to , or in replacement of , those currently utilized by the company based upon enhanced technology and regulatory changes . we are sometimes a party to environmental lawsuits and claims and have received notices of potential violations of environmental laws and regulations from the u.s . environmental protection agency ( the \"epa\" ) and similar state authorities . we have also been identified as a potentially responsible party ( \"prp\" ) for cleanup costs associated with off-site waste disposal at federal superfund and state remediation sites . for all such sites , there are other prps and , in most instances , our involvement is minimal . in estimating our liability , we have assumed that we will not bear the entire cost of remediation of any site to the exclusion of other prps who may be jointly and severally liable . the ability of other prps to participate has been taken into account , based on our understanding of the parties 2019 financial condition and probable contributions on a per site basis . additional lawsuits and claims involving environmental matters are likely to arise from time to time in the future . we incurred $ 3.2 million , $ 23.3 million , and $ 4.4 million of expenses during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively , for environmental remediation at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by us . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 28.9 million and $ 30.6 million . of these amounts $ 8.9 million and $ 9.6 million , respectively , relate to remediation of sites previously disposed by us . given the evolving nature of environmental laws , regulations and technology , the ultimate cost of future compliance is uncertain. .\nQuestion: what were the reserves for environmental matters in the year of 2017, in millions?\nAnswer: 28.9\nQuestion: and what were they in 2016, also in millions?\nAnswer: 30.6\nQuestion: what was, then, in millions, the total sum of reserves for environmental matters in both of these years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "59.5"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5961
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , the company held a total of ten interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variable rate interest obligations under its amt opco and spectrasite credit facilities and four forward starting interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the securitization which the company designated as cash flow hedges . the eight american tower swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $ 450.0 million and fixed rates ranging between 4.63% ( 4.63 % ) and 4.88% ( 4.88 % ) and the two spectrasite swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $ 100.0 million and a fixed rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . the four forward starting interest rate swap agreements had an aggregate notional amount of $ 900.0 million , fixed rates ranging between 4.73% ( 4.73 % ) and 5.10% ( 5.10 % ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also held three interest rate swap instruments and one interest rate cap instrument that were acquired in the spectrasite , inc . merger in august 2005 and were not designated as cash flow hedges . the three interest rate swaps , which had a fair value of $ 6.7 million at the date of acquisition , have an aggregate notional amount of $ 300.0 million , a fixed rate of 3.88% ( 3.88 % ) . the interest rate cap had a notional amount of $ 175.0 million , a fixed rate of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) , and expired in february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains on short term available-for-sale securities of $ 10.4 million and unrealized gains related to the interest rate swap agreements in the table above of $ 5.7 million , net of tax . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 6.5 million ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 3.5 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 0.7 million ( net of an income tax benefit of $ 0.2 million ) into results of operations during the year ended december 31 , 2006 . 9 . commitments and contingencies lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 217969</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>215763</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>208548</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>199024</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>190272</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2451496</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3483072</td></tr></table> aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was change in the value of the aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?\nAnswer: 68.3\nQuestion: what was the value in 2005?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "168.7"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2994
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nincreased over 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 , costs for trucking services provided by intermodal carriers remained flat as we substantially reduced expenses associated with network inefficiencies . higher diesel fuel prices increased sales and use taxes in 2005 , which resulted in higher state and local taxes . other contract expenses for equipment maintenance and other services increased in 2005 . the 2005 january west coast storm and hurricanes katrina and rita also contributed to higher expenses in 2005 ( net of insurance settlements received ) . partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in relocation expenses as we incurred higher relocation costs associated with moving support personnel to omaha , nebraska during 2004 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>% ( % ) change 2006 v 2005</td><td>% ( % ) change 2005 v 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td><td>( 19 ) % ( % )</td><td>65% ( 65 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td><td>-504 ( 504 )</td><td>-527 ( 527 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-919 ( 919 )</td><td>-410 ( 410 )</td><td>-252 ( 252 )</td><td>124</td><td>63</td></tr></table> other income 2013 lower net gains from non-operating asset sales and higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program resulted in a reduction in other income in 2006 , which was partially offset by higher rental income for the use of our right-of-way ( including 2006 settlements of rate disputes from prior years ) and cash investment returns due to higher interest rates . in 2005 , other income increased largely as a result of higher gains from real estate sales partially offset by higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program . interest expense 2013 lower interest expense in 2006 and 2005 was primarily due to declining weighted-average debt levels of $ 7.1 billion , $ 7.8 billion , and $ 8.1 billion in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . a higher effective interest rate of 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) in 2006 , compared to 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) in both 2005 and 2004 , partially offset the effects of the declining debt level . income taxes 2013 income tax expense was $ 509 million higher in 2006 than 2005 . higher pre-tax income resulted in additional taxes of $ 414 million and $ 118 million of the increase resulted from the one-time reduction in 2005 described below . our effective tax rate was 36.4% ( 36.4 % ) and 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . income taxes were greater in 2005 than 2004 due to higher pre-tax income partially offset by a previously reported reduction in income tax expense . in our quarterly report on form 10-q for the quarter ended june 30 , 2005 , we reported that the corporation analyzed the impact that final settlements of pre-1995 tax years had on previously recorded estimates of deferred tax assets and liabilities . the completed analysis of the final settlements for pre-1995 tax years , along with internal revenue service examination reports for tax years 1995 through 2002 were considered , among other things , in a review and re-evaluation of the corporation 2019s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of september 30 , 2005 , resulting in an income tax expense reduction of $ 118 million in .\nQuestion: what was the other income for 2006?\nAnswer: 118.0\nQuestion: and for 2005?\nAnswer: 145.0\nQuestion: combined, what is the total value for these years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "263.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6207
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 166137 )</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2018 . a0 a0the $ 150 million credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against $ 5 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . a0 a0as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 50 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 24.9 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc , and the current authorization extends through december 2018 . entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery retail rates 2015 base rate filing in april 2015 , entergy arkansas filed with the apsc for a general change in rates , charges , and tariffs . the filing notified the apsc of entergy arkansas 2019s intent to implement a forward test year formula rate plan pursuant to arkansas legislation passed in 2015 , and requested a retail rate increase of $ 268.4 million , with a net increase in revenue of $ 167 million . the filing requested a 10.2% ( 10.2 % ) return on common equity . in september 2015 the apsc staff and intervenors filed direct testimony , with the apsc staff recommending a revenue requirement of $ 217.9 million and a 9.65% ( 9.65 % ) return on common equity . in december 2015 , entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and certain of the intervenors in the rate case filed with the apsc a joint motion for approval of a settlement of the case that proposed a retail rate increase of approximately $ 225 million with a net increase in revenue of approximately $ 133 million ; an authorized return on common equity of 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) ; and a formula rate plan tariff that provides a +/- 50 basis point band around the 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) allowed return on common equity . a significant portion of the rate increase is related to entergy arkansas 2019s acquisition in march 2016 of union power station power block 2 for a base purchase price of $ 237 million . the settlement agreement also provided for amortization over a 10-year period of $ 7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano post-fukushima compliance and $ 9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano flood barrier compliance . a settlement hearing was held in january 2016 . in february 2016 the apsc approved the settlement with one exception that reduced the retail rate increase proposed in the settlement by $ 5 million . the settling parties agreed to the apsc modifications in february 2016 . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . in march 2016 , entergy arkansas made a compliance filing regarding the .\nQuestion: what was the total of the entergy arkansas 2019s payables in 2017, in millions?\nAnswer: 166137.0\nQuestion: and what was it for 2016?\nAnswer: 51232.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total of payables for both years?\nAnswer: 217369.0\nQuestion: including 2015, what becomes this total?\nAnswer: 270111.0\nQuestion: and as of the last year of this period, what percentage of the aggregate borrowing capacity was set to expire in 2019?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.32"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2327
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nresult of the effects of the costa concordia incident and the continued instability in the european eco- nomic landscape . however , we continue to believe in the long term growth potential of this market . we estimate that europe was served by 102 ships with approximately 108000 berths at the beginning of 2008 and by 117 ships with approximately 156000 berths at the end of 2012 . there are approximately 9 ships with an estimated 25000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2013 and 2017 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruise guests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 )</td><td>north american cruise guests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 )</td><td>european cruise guests</td><td>weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>20823000</td><td>425000</td><td>12044000</td><td>254000</td><td>6040000</td><td>152000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2008 through 2011 . year 2012 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : clia europe , formerly european cruise council , for years 2008 through 2011 . year 2012 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our princi- pal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consumers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influenced by political and general economic conditions . com- panies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : 2022 protect the health , safety and security of our guests and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , 2022 strengthen and support our human capital in order to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , 2022 further strengthen our consumer engagement in order to enhance our revenues , 2022 increase the awareness and market penetration of our brands globally , 2022 focus on cost efficiency , manage our operating expenditures and ensure adequate cash and liquid- ity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , 2022 strategically invest in our fleet through the revit ad alization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while prudently expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , 2022 capitalize on the portability and flexibility of our ships by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , 2022 further enhance our technological capabilities to service customer preferences and expectations in an innovative manner , while supporting our strategic focus on profitability , and part i 0494.indd 13 3/27/13 12:52 pm .\nQuestion: what is the average number of berths per ship in 2008?\nAnswer: 1058.82353\nQuestion: what about in 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1333.33333"
}
] |
CONVFINQA723
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .\nQuestion: what was the average value of de@r in 2002?\nAnswer: 10.8\nQuestion: what was the average value of de@r in 2001?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "6.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8109
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense . also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income . the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased slightly , by $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and a lower effective income tax rate , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , lower other income , and higher interest expense . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 2408.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>69.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>-6.5 ( 6.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-6.7 ( 6.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>-17.2 ( 17.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-9.0 ( 9.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 2438.4</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to changes in transmission investments , including entergy louisiana 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage and an increase in volume during the unbilled period . the increase .\nQuestion: what is the change in net revenue from 2015 to 2016 for entergy louisiana?\nAnswer: 29.6\nQuestion: what is the net revenue in 2015?\nAnswer: 2408.8\nQuestion: what growth rate does this rerpesent?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.01229"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10657
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td><td>$ 1356</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>234</td><td>203</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2010 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : consulting services : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . outsourcing services : 2022 benefits outsourcing applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core hr process transactions as well as other complementary services such as absence management , flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy . beginning in late 2008 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace . weak economic conditions globally continued throughout 2010 . the prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate . while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting .\nQuestion: what was the revenue in 2010?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "2111.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA514
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 14215</td><td>$ 15794</td><td>$ 442</td><td>$ 4737</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $ 25 million scheduled to expire in november 2018 . the credit facility allows entergy new orleans to issue letters of credit against $ 10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility . in addition , entergy new orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 6.2 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy new orleans 2019s letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy new orleans obtained authorization from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 100 million at any time outstanding . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through june 2018 . state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy new orleans charges for electricity and natural gas significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy new orleans is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the city council , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . retail rates see 201calgiers asset transfer 201d below for discussion of the transfer from entergy louisiana to entergy new orleans of certain assets that serve algiers customers . in march 2013 , entergy louisiana filed a rate case for the algiers area , which is in new orleans and is regulated by the city council . entergy louisiana requested a rate increase of $ 13 million over three years , including a 10.4% ( 10.4 % ) return on common equity and a formula rate plan mechanism identical to its lpsc request . in january 2014 the city council advisors filed direct testimony recommending a rate increase of $ 5.56 million over three years , including an 8.13% ( 8.13 % ) return on common equity . in june 2014 the city council unanimously approved a settlement that includes the following : 2022 a $ 9.3 million base rate revenue increase to be phased in on a levelized basis over four years ; 2022 recovery of an additional $ 853 thousand annually through a miso recovery rider ; and 2022 the adoption of a four-year formula rate plan requiring the filing of annual evaluation reports in may of each year , commencing may 2015 , with resulting rates being implemented in october of each year . the formula rate plan includes a midpoint target authorized return on common equity of 9.95% ( 9.95 % ) with a +/- 40 basis point bandwidth . the rate increase was effective with bills rendered on and after the first billing cycle of july 2014 . additional compliance filings were made with the city council in october 2014 for approval of the form of certain rate riders , including among others , a ninemile 6 non-fuel cost recovery interim rider , allowing for contemporaneous recovery of capacity .\nQuestion: what was the amount of receivables in 2016?\nAnswer: 14215.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2015?\nAnswer: 15794.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total amount of receivables in both years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "30009.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8793
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) mid cap 400 index and the russell 1000 index , both of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/11</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/12</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/13</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/14</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/15</td><td>12/31/16</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>a . o . smith corporation</td><td>100.0</td><td>159.5</td><td>275.8</td><td>292.0</td><td>401.0</td><td>501.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p mid cap 400 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>117.9</td><td>157.4</td><td>172.8</td><td>169.0</td><td>204.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>116.4</td><td>155.0</td><td>175.4</td><td>177.0</td><td>198.4</td></tr></table> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 smith ( a o ) corp s&p midcap 400 index russell 1000 index .\nQuestion: what was the net change in price for a.o. smith corp from 2011 to 2016?\nAnswer: 401.4\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "4.014"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4217
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninternational networks international networks generated revenues of $ 3.0 billion and adjusted oibda of $ 848 million during 2016 , which represented 47% ( 47 % ) and 35% ( 35 % ) of our total consolidated revenues and adjusted oibda , respectively . our international networks segment principally consists of national and pan-regional television networks and brands that are delivered across multiple distribution platforms . this segment generates revenue from operations in virtually every pay-tv market in the world through an infrastructure that includes operational centers in london , warsaw , milan , singapore and miami . global brands include discovery channel , animal planet , tlc , id , science channel and turbo ( known as velocity in the u.s. ) , along with brands exclusive to international networks , including eurosport , real time , dmax and discovery kids . as of december 31 , 2016 , international networks operated over 400 unique distribution feeds in over 40 languages with channel feeds customized according to language needs and advertising sales opportunities . international networks also has fta and broadcast networks in europe and the middle east and broadcast networks in germany , norway and sweden , and continues to pursue further international expansion . fta networks generate a significant portion of international networks' revenue . the penetration and growth rates of television services vary across countries and territories depending on numerous factors including the dominance of different television platforms in local markets . while pay-tv services have greater penetration in certain markets , fta or broadcast television is dominant in others . international networks has a large international distribution platform for its 37 networks , with as many as 13 networks distributed in any particular country or territory across the more than 220 countries and territories around the world . international networks pursues distribution across all television platforms based on the specific dynamics of local markets and relevant commercial agreements . in addition to the global networks described in the overview section above , we operate networks internationally that utilize the following brands : 2022 eurosport is the leading sports entertainment provider across europe with the following tv brands : eurosport , eurosport 2 and eurosportnews , reaching viewers across europe and asia , as well as eurosport digital , which includes eurosport player and eurosport.com . 2022 viewing subscribers reached by each brand as of december 31 , 2016 were as follows : eurosport : 133 million ; eurosport 2 : 65 million ; and eurosportnews : 9 million . 2022 eurosport telecasts live sporting events with both local and pan-regional appeal and its events focus on winter sports , cycling and tennis , including the tour de france and it is the home of grand slam tennis with all four tournaments . important local sports rights include bundesliga and motogp . in addition , eurosport has increasingly invested in more exclusive and localized rights to drive local audience and commercial relevance . 2022 we have acquired the exclusive broadcast rights across all media platforms throughout europe for the four olympic games between 2018 and 2024 for 20ac1.3 billion ( $ 1.5 billion as of december 31 , 2016 ) . the broadcast rights exclude france for the olympic games in 2018 and 2020 , and exclude russia . in addition to fta broadcasts for the olympic games , many of these events are set to air on eurosport's pay-tv and digital platforms . 2022 on november 2 , 2016 , we announced a long-term agreement and joint venture partnership with bamtech ( \"mlbam\" ) a technology services and video streaming company , and subsidiary of major league baseball's digital business , that includes the formation of bamtech europe , a joint venture that will provide digital technology services to a broad set of both sports and entertainment clients across europe . 2022 as of december 31 , 2016 , dmax reached approximately 103 million viewers through fta networks , according to internal estimates . 2022 dmax is a men 2019s factual entertainment channel in asia and europe . 2022 discovery kids reached approximately 121 million viewers , according to internal estimates , as of december 31 , 2016 . 2022 discovery kids is a leading children's network in latin america and asia . our international networks segment also owns and operates the following regional television networks , which reached the following number of subscribers and viewers via pay and fta or broadcast networks , respectively , as of december 31 , 2016 : television service international subscribers/viewers ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>television service</td><td>internationalsubscribers/viewers ( millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quest</td><td>fta</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nordic broadcast networks ( a )</td><td>broadcast</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>giallo</td><td>fta</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>frisbee</td><td>fta</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>focus</td><td>fta</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>k2</td><td>fta</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deejay tv</td><td>fta</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>discovery hd world</td><td>pay</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shed</td><td>pay</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>discovery history</td><td>pay</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>discovery world</td><td>pay</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>discovery en espanol ( u.s. )</td><td>pay</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>discovery familia ( u.s. )</td><td>pay</td><td>6</td></tr></table> ( a ) number of subscribers corresponds to the sum of the subscribers to each of the nordic broadcast networks in sweden , norway , finland and denmark subject to retransmission agreements with pay-tv providers . the nordic broadcast networks include kanal 5 , kanal 9 , and kanal 11 in sweden , tv norge , max , fem and vox in norway , tv 5 , kutonen , and frii in finland , and kanal 4 , kanal 5 , 6'eren , and canal 9 in denmark . similar to u.s . networks , a significant source of revenue for international networks relates to fees charged to operators who distribute our linear networks . such operators primarily include cable and dth satellite service providers . international television markets vary in their stages of development . some markets , such as the u.k. , are more advanced digital television markets , while others remain in the analog environment with varying degrees of investment from operators to expand channel capacity or convert to digital technologies . common practice in some markets results in long-term contractual distribution relationships , while customers in other markets renew contracts annually . distribution revenue for our international networks segment is largely dependent on the number of subscribers that receive our networks or content , the rates negotiated in the distributor agreements , and the market demand for the content that we provide . the other significant source of revenue for international networks relates to advertising sold on our television networks and across distribution platforms , similar to u.s . networks . advertising revenue is dependent upon a number of factors , including the development of pay and fta television markets , the number of subscribers to and viewers of our channels , viewership demographics , the popularity of our programming , and our ability to sell commercial time over a portfolio of channels on multiple platforms . in certain markets , our advertising sales business operates with in-house sales teams , while we rely on external sales representation services in other markets . in developing television markets , advertising revenue growth results from continued subscriber growth , our localization strategy , and the shift of advertising spending from traditional broadcast networks to channels .\nQuestion: what was the sum of eurosport and eurosport 2 viewing subscribers?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "198.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9841
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsystem energy resources , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis with syndicated bank letters of credit . in december 2004 , system energy amended these letters of credit and they now expire in may 2009 . system energy may refinance or redeem debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy has obtained a short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow , through march 31 , 2010 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 200 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy's short-term borrowing limits . system energy has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long- term authorization extends through june 2009 . system energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 42915</td><td>$ 53620</td><td>$ 88231</td><td>$ 277287</td></tr></table> in may 2007 , $ 22.5 million of system energy's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans . see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . nuclear matters system energy owns and operates grand gulf . system energy is , therefore , subject to the risks related to owning and operating a nuclear plant . these include risks from the use , storage , handling and disposal of high-level and low-level radioactive materials , regulatory requirement changes , including changes resulting from events at other plants , limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available for losses in connection with nuclear operations , and technological and financial uncertainties related to decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives , including the sufficiency of funds in decommissioning trusts . in the event of an unanticipated early shutdown of grand gulf , system energy may be required to provide additional funds or credit support to satisfy regulatory requirements for decommissioning . environmental risks system energy's facilities and operations are subject to regulation by various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over air quality , water quality , control of toxic substances and hazardous and solid wastes , and other environmental matters . management believes that system energy is in substantial compliance with environmental regulations currently applicable to its facilities and operations . because environmental regulations are subject to change , future compliance costs cannot be precisely estimated . critical accounting estimates the preparation of system energy's financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to apply appropriate accounting policies and to make estimates and judgments that .\nQuestion: what is the balance of system energy's receivables from the money pool in 2007?\nAnswer: 53620.0\nQuestion: what about in 2008?\nAnswer: 42915.0\nQuestion: what impact does it have in the cash flow statement?\nAnswer: 10705.0\nQuestion: what is the percentage change in the balance from 2007 to 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.24945"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10053
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest net of capitalized interest</td><td>$ 275305</td><td>$ 252030</td><td>$ 222088</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income taxes net of refunds received</td><td>$ 188946</td><td>$ -39293 ( 39293 )</td><td>$ 41108</td></tr></table> eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2017 included non-cash additions of $ 282 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .\nQuestion: what was the interest net of capitalized interest in 2017?\nAnswer: 275305.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "252030.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8942
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of a liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and political and economic conditions in certain countries . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company- specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons ( overnight , one week , two weeks , one month , three months , one year ) and over a variety of stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains a series of contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal measures that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . in december 2016 , the federal reserve board adopted final rules which require additional disclosures relating to the lcr of large financial institutions , including citi . among other things , the final rules require citi to disclose components of its average hqla , lcr and inflows and outflows each quarter . in addition , the final rules require disclosure of citi 2019s calculation of the maturity mismatch add-on as well as other qualitative disclosures . the effective date for these disclosures is april 1 , 2017 . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td><td>sept . 30 2016</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 403.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td><td>$ 389.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>332.5</td><td>335.3</td><td>344.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>113% ( 113 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 71.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 44.8</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased both year-over-year and sequentially . the increase year-over-year was driven by both an increase in hqla and a reduction in net outflows . sequentially , the increase was driven by a slight reduction in net outflows , as hqla remained largely unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in the second quarter of 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . standardized weightings would be required to be applied to the various asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2016 , it will need to evaluate any final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2017 . the proposed rules would require full implementation of the u.s . nsfr beginning january 1 , 2018. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the lcr from 2014 to 2016?\nAnswer: 8.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.0708\nQuestion: what is the net outflows\tin 2016?\nAnswer: 332.5\nQuestion: what about in 2015?\nAnswer: 344.4\nQuestion: what is the net change in net outflows?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-11.9"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6561
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 132 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase primarily was attributable to approximately $ 115 million of higher operating profit on c-130 programs due to increased volume and the retirement of risks ; increased volume and risk retirements on f-16 programs of about $ 50 million and c-5 programs of approximately $ 20 million ; and about $ 70 million due to risk retirements on other aeronautics sustainment activities in 2011 . these increases partially were offset by a decline in operating profit of approximately $ 75 million on the f-22 program and f-35 development contract primarily due to lower volume and about $ 55 million on other programs , including f-35 lrip , primarily due to lower profit rate adjustments in 2011 compared to 2010 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 90 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 contracts and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to higher orders on f-35 contracts , which partially were offset by higher sales volume on the c-130 programs . trends we expect aeronautics will experience a mid single digit percentage range decline in net sales for 2013 as compared to 2012 . a decrease in net sales from a decline in f-16 and c-130j aircraft deliveries is expected to be partially offset by an increase in net sales volume on f-35 lrip contracts . operating profit is projected to decrease at a high single digit percentage range from 2012 levels due to the expected decline in net sales as well as changes in aircraft mix , resulting in a slight decline in operating margins between the years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides management services , integrated information technology solutions , and advanced technology systems and expertise across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continuing downturn in the federal information technology budgets and the impact of the continuing resolution that was effective on october 1 , 2012 , the start of the u.s . government 2019s fiscal year . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td><td>$ 9921</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>808</td><td>874</td><td>814</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td><td>8.2% ( 8.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td><td>9700</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford ; warfighter information network-tactical ( win-t ) ; command , control , battle management and communications ( c2bmc ) ; and transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) ) . partially offsetting the decreases were higher net sales of approximately $ 140 million from qtc , which was acquired early in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and about $ 65 million from increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and persistent threat detection system ( ptds ) operational support . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2012 decreased $ 66 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 50 million due to the favorable impact of the odin contract completion in 2011 ; about $ 25 million due to an increase in reserves for performance issues related to an international airborne surveillance system in 2012 ; and approximately $ 20 million due to lower volume on certain programs ( primarily c2bmc and win-t ) . partially offsetting the decreases was an increase in operating profit due to higher risk retirements of approximately $ 15 million from the twic program ; and about $ 10 million due to increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and ptds operational support . operating profit for the jtrs program was comparable as a decrease in volume was offset by a decrease in reserves . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 20 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .\nQuestion: what was the operating profit, in millions, in 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "874.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8387
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart a0ii item a05 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201ctfx . 201d as of february 19 , 2019 , we had 473 holders of record of our common stock . a substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are beneficial owners whose shares are held by brokers and other financial institutions for the accounts of beneficial owners . stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2013 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>124</td><td>143</td><td>177</td><td>275</td><td>288</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>114</td><td>115</td><td>129</td><td>157</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>126</td><td>134</td><td>142</td><td>186</td><td>213</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 126 134 142 186 213 .\nQuestion: what is the change in value of an investment in teleflex inc from 2014 to 2015?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "19.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2989
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nportion of the death benefits directly from the insurance company and the company receives the remainder of the death benefits . it is currently expected that minimal cash payments will be required to fund these policies . the net periodic pension cost for these split-dollar life insurance arrangements was $ 5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . the company has recorded a liability representing the actuarial present value of the future death benefits as of the employees 2019 expected retirement date of $ 51 million and $ 58 million as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively . deferred compensation plan the company amended and reinstated its deferred compensation plan ( 201cthe plan 201d ) effective june 1 , 2013 to reopen the plan to certain participants . under the plan , participating executives may elect to defer base salary and cash incentive compensation in excess of 401 ( k ) plan limitations . participants under the plan may choose to invest their deferred amounts in the same investment alternatives available under the company's 401 ( k ) plan . the plan also allows for company matching contributions for the following : ( i ) the first 4% ( 4 % ) of compensation deferred under the plan , subject to a maximum of $ 50000 for board officers , ( ii ) lost matching amounts that would have been made under the 401 ( k ) plan if participants had not participated in the plan , and ( iii ) discretionary amounts as approved by the compensation and leadership committee of the board of directors . defined contribution plan the company and certain subsidiaries have various defined contribution plans , in which all eligible employees may participate . in the u.s. , the 401 ( k ) plan is a contributory plan . matching contributions are based upon the amount of the employees 2019 contributions . the company 2019s expenses for material defined contribution plans for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were $ 44 million , $ 42 million and $ 48 million , respectively . beginning january 1 , 2012 , the company may make an additional discretionary 401 ( k ) plan matching contribution to eligible employees . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company made no discretionary matching contributions . 8 . share-based compensation plans and other incentive plans stock options , stock appreciation rights and employee stock purchase plan the company grants options to acquire shares of common stock to certain employees and to existing option holders of acquired companies in connection with the merging of option plans following an acquisition . each option granted and stock appreciation right has an exercise price of no less than 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant . the awards have a contractual life of five to fifteen years and vest over two to four years . stock options and stock appreciation rights assumed or replaced with comparable stock options or stock appreciation rights in conjunction with a change in control of the company only become exercisable if the holder is also involuntarily terminated ( for a reason other than cause ) or quits for good reason within 24 months of a change in control . the employee stock purchase plan allows eligible participants to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock through payroll deductions of up to 20% ( 20 % ) of eligible compensation on an after-tax basis . plan participants cannot purchase more than $ 25000 of stock in any calendar year . the price an employee pays per share is 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of the company 2019s stock on the close of the first trading day or last trading day of the purchase period . the plan has two purchase periods , the first from october 1 through march 31 and the second from april 1 through september 30 . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , employees purchased 1.5 million , 1.4 million and 2.2 million shares , respectively , at purchase prices of $ 43.02 and $ 50.47 , $ 34.52 and $ 42.96 , and $ 30.56 and $ 35.61 , respectively . the company calculates the value of each employee stock option , estimated on the date of grant , using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 9.52 , $ 9.60 and $ 13.25 , respectively , using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>22.1% ( 22.1 % )</td><td>24.0% ( 24.0 % )</td><td>28.8% ( 28.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.9% ( 0.9 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>2.2% ( 2.2 % )</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>5.9</td><td>6.1</td><td>6.0</td></tr></table> the company uses the implied volatility for traded options on the company 2019s stock as the expected volatility assumption required in the black-scholes model . the selection of the implied volatility approach was based upon the availability of .\nQuestion: what is the expected volatility in 2013?\nAnswer: 22.1\nQuestion: what about in 2012?\nAnswer: 24.0\nQuestion: what is the total for 2012 and 2013?\nAnswer: 46.1\nQuestion: what about adding 2011?\nAnswer: 74.9\nQuestion: what is the average for three years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "24.96667"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10577
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbacklog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to higher orders on f-35 and c-130 programs . backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 due to increased volume on the f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by decreased volume on the f-16 program . operating profit is also expected to increase in the low single-digit percentage range , driven by increased volume on the f-35 program offset by contract mix that results in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs 2019 technical services business provides a comprehensive portfolio of technical and sustainment services . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5596</td><td>$ 5654</td><td>$ 6115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>508</td><td>472</td><td>498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>8.3% ( 8.3 % )</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 4800</td><td>$ 6000</td><td>$ 6300</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 58 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 395 million as a result of key program completions , lower customer funding levels and increased competition , coupled with the fragmentation of existing large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price when re-competed ( including cms-citic ) . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 230 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 110 million due to the start-up of new programs and growth in recently awarded programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit increased $ 36 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to improved program performance and risk retirements , offset by decreased operating profit resulting from the activities mentioned above for net sales . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 70 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 461 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 475 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to decreased volume in technical services programs reflecting market pressures . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of about $ 330 million due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 26 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to the activities mentioned above for sales , partially offset by severance recoveries related to the restructuring announced in november 2013 of approximately $ 20 million in 2014 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were comparable in 2014 and 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the backlog at year-end in 2015?\nAnswer: 4800.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\nAnswer: 6000.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total backlog at year-end for the two years?\nAnswer: 10800.0\nQuestion: including 2013, what then becomes that total for the three years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "17100.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10306
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmovement in exit cost liabilities the movement in exit cost liabilities for pmi was as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>liability balance january 1 2014</td><td>$ 308</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>charges net</td><td>391</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash spent</td><td>-360 ( 360 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currency/other</td><td>-69 ( 69 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>liability balance december 31 2014</td><td>$ 270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>charges net</td><td>68</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cash spent</td><td>-232 ( 232 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>currency/other</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>liability balance december 31 2015</td><td>$ 54</td></tr></table> cash payments related to exit costs at pmi were $ 232 million , $ 360 million and $ 21 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . future cash payments for exit costs incurred to date are expected to be approximately $ 54 million , and will be substantially paid by the end of 2017 . the pre-tax asset impairment and exit costs shown above are primarily a result of the following : the netherlands on april 4 , 2014 , pmi announced the initiation by its affiliate , philip morris holland b.v . ( 201cpmh 201d ) , of consultations with employee representatives on a proposal to discontinue cigarette production at its factory located in bergen op zoom , the netherlands . pmh reached an agreement with the trade unions and their members on a social plan and ceased cigarette production on september 1 , 2014 . during 2014 , total pre-tax asset impairment and exit costs of $ 489 million were recorded for this program in the european union segment . this amount includes employee separation costs of $ 343 million , asset impairment costs of $ 139 million and other separation costs of $ 7 million . separation program charges pmi recorded other pre-tax separation program charges of $ 68 million , $ 41 million and $ 51 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . the 2015 other pre-tax separation program charges primarily related to severance costs for the organizational restructuring in the european union segment . the 2014 other pre-tax separation program charges primarily related to severance costs for factory closures in australia and canada and the restructuring of the u.s . leaf purchasing model . the 2013 pre-tax separation program charges primarily related to the restructuring of global and regional functions based in switzerland and australia . contract termination charges during 2013 , pmi recorded exit costs of $ 258 million related to the termination of distribution agreements in eastern europe , middle east & africa ( due to a new business model in egypt ) and asia . asset impairment charges during 2014 , pmi recorded other pre-tax asset impairment charges of $ 5 million related to a factory closure in canada. .\nQuestion: what was the liability balance by the end of 2015?\nAnswer: 54.0\nQuestion: and what was it in the beginning of that year?\nAnswer: 270.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change throughout the year?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-216.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7760
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfederal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>$ 514177</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>82551</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-1390 ( 1390 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>595338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>663750</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the ratio of the additions in 2005 to the ones in 2004?\nAnswer: 1.01339\nQuestion: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?\nAnswer: 0.01339\nQuestion: and in the previous year of this period, what was the total of deductions?\nAnswer: 1390.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2004?\nAnswer: 15244.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the combined total for both years?\nAnswer: 16634.0\nQuestion: including 2006, what becomes this total?\nAnswer: 29441.0\nQuestion: and what were the average deductions between the three years?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "9813.66667"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10314
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>134</td><td>166</td><td>192</td><td>237</td><td>368</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>132</td><td>151</td><td>153</td><td>171</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>128</td><td>161</td><td>171</td><td>181</td><td>238</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 128 161 171 181 238 .\nQuestion: what was the performance price of the teleflex in 2017?\nAnswer: 368.0\nQuestion: and what was the change in this price since 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "268.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1946
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndevon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in our total proved undeveloped reserves during 2011 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>canada</td><td>north america</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2010</td><td>411</td><td>420</td><td>831</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>118</td><td>30</td><td>148</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td><td>5</td><td>-51 ( 51 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-68 ( 68 )</td><td>-62 ( 62 )</td><td>-130 ( 130 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2011</td><td>403</td><td>379</td><td>782</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2011 , devon had 782 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 6% ( 6 % ) decrease as compared to 2010 and represents 26% ( 26 % ) of its total proved reserves . drilling activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 148 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 130 mmboe , or 16% ( 16 % ) , of the 2010 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 51 mmboe primarily due to its evaluation of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which it does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas at carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2011 largely related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 367 mmboe and 396 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2025 . price revisions 2011 2014reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . 2010 2014reserves increased 72 mmboe due to higher gas prices , partially offset by the effect of higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . of the 72 mmboe price revisions , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 22 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2009 2014reserves increased 177 mmboe due to higher oil prices , partially offset by lower gas prices . the increase in oil reserves primarily related to devon 2019s jackfish thermal heavy oil reserves in canada . at the end of 2008 , 331 mmboe of reserves related to jackfish were not considered proved . however , due to higher prices , these reserves were considered proved as of december 31 , 2009 . significantly lower gas prices caused devon 2019s reserves to decrease 116 mmboe , which primarily related to its u.s . reserves . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions noted in the proved undeveloped reserves discussion above . total revisions other than price for 2010 and 2009 primarily related to devon 2019s drilling and development in the barnett shale. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of total proved undeveloped reserves for u.s. onshore between 2010 and 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-8.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA11080
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nincome and franchise tax provisions are allocable to contracts in process and , accordingly , are included in general and administrative expenses . deferred income taxes are recorded when revenues and expenses are recognized in different periods for financial statement purposes than for tax return purposes . deferred tax asset or liability account balances are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect . determinations of the expected realizability of deferred tax assets and the need for any valuation allowances against these deferred tax assets were evaluated based upon the stand-alone tax attributes of the company , and valuation allowances of $ 21 million and $ 18 million were deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . uncertain tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold , based on the merits of the position , are recognized in the financial statements . we recognize the amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% ( 50 % ) likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority . if a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties , we recognize an expense for the amount of the penalty in the period the tax position is claimed or expected to be claimed in our tax return . penalties , if probable and reasonably estimable , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . we also recognize accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense . the timing and amount of accrued interest is determined by the applicable tax law associated with an underpayment of income taxes . see note 11 : income taxes . under existing gaap , changes in accruals associated with uncertainties are recorded in earnings in the period they are determined . cash and cash equivalents - the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items , having original maturity dates of 90 days or less . accounts receivable - accounts receivable include amounts billed and currently due from customers , amounts currently due but unbilled , certain estimated contract change amounts , claims or requests for equitable adjustment in negotiation that are probable of recovery , and amounts retained by the customer pending contract completion . inventoried costs - inventoried costs primarily relate to work in process under contracts that recognize revenues using labor dollars or units of delivery as the basis of the percentage-of-completion calculation . these costs represent accumulated contract costs less cost of sales , as calculated using the percentage-of-completion method . accumulated contract costs include direct production costs , factory and engineering overhead , production tooling costs , and , for government contracts , allowable general and administrative expenses . according to the provisions of the company's u.s . government contracts , the customer asserts title to , or a security interest in , inventories related to such contracts as a result of contract advances , performance-based payments , and progress payments . in accordance with industry practice , inventoried costs are classified as a current asset and include amounts related to contracts having production cycles longer than one year . inventoried costs also include company owned raw materials , which are stated at the lower of cost or market , generally using the average cost method . property , plant , and equipment - depreciable properties owned by the company are recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of individual assets . costs incurred for computer software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized over the expected useful life of the software , not to exceed nine years . leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their useful lives or the term of the lease . the remaining assets are depreciated using the straight-line method , with the following lives: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>land improvements</td><td>years 3</td><td>years -</td><td>years 45</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>buildings and improvements</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capitalized software costs</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>machinery and other equipment</td><td>2</td><td>-</td><td>45</td></tr></table> the company evaluates the recoverability of its property , plant and equipment when there are changes in economic circumstances or business objectives that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable . the company's evaluations include estimated future cash flows , profitability and other factors in determining fair value . as these assumptions and estimates may change over time , it may or may not be necessary to record impairment charges. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in valuation allowance from 2011 to 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "3.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8271
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock are listed and traded on the nasdaq global select market ( 201cnasdaq 201d ) under the symbols 201cdisca , 201d 201cdiscb 201d and 201cdisck , 201d respectively . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the range of high and low sales prices per share of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as reported on yahoo! finance ( finance.yahoo.com ) . series a common stock series b common stock series c common stock high low high low high low fourth quarter $ 23.73 $ 16.28 $ 26.80 $ 20.00 $ 22.47 $ 15.27 third quarter $ 27.18 $ 20.80 $ 27.90 $ 22.00 $ 26.21 $ 19.62 second quarter $ 29.40 $ 25.11 $ 29.55 $ 25.45 $ 28.90 $ 24.39 first quarter $ 29.62 $ 26.34 $ 29.65 $ 27.55 $ 28.87 $ 25.76 fourth quarter $ 29.55 $ 25.01 $ 30.50 $ 26.00 $ 28.66 $ 24.20 third quarter $ 26.97 $ 24.27 $ 28.00 $ 25.21 $ 26.31 $ 23.44 second quarter $ 29.31 $ 23.73 $ 29.34 $ 24.15 $ 28.48 $ 22.54 first quarter $ 29.42 $ 24.33 $ 29.34 $ 24.30 $ 28.00 $ 23.81 as of february 21 , 2018 , there were approximately 1308 , 75 and 1414 record holders of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , respectively . these amounts do not include the number of shareholders whose shares are held of record by banks , brokerage houses or other institutions , but include each such institution as one shareholder . we have not paid any cash dividends on our series a common stock , series b common stock or series c common stock , and we have no present intention to do so . payment of cash dividends , if any , will be determined by our board of directors after consideration of our earnings , financial condition and other relevant factors such as our credit facility's restrictions on our ability to declare dividends in certain situations . purchases of equity securities the following table presents information about our repurchases of common stock that were made through open market transactions during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 ( in millions , except per share amounts ) . period total number of series c shares purchased average paid per share : series c ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( b ) ( c ) approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( a ) ( b ) october 1 , 2017 - october 31 , 2017 2014 $ 2014 2014 $ 2014 november 1 , 2017 - november 30 , 2017 2014 $ 2014 2014 $ 2014 december 1 , 2017 - december 31 , 2017 2014 $ 2014 2014 $ 2014 total 2014 2014 $ 2014 ( a ) the amounts do not give effect to any fees , commissions or other costs associated with repurchases of shares . ( b ) under the stock repurchase program , management was authorized to purchase shares of the company's common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices or pursuant to one or more accelerated stock repurchase agreements or other derivative arrangements as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . the company's authorization under the program expired on october 8 , 2017 and we have not repurchased any shares of common stock since then . we historically have funded and in the future may fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations and the issuance of debt . in the future , if further authorization is provided , we may also choose to fund stock repurchases through borrowings under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during 2017 and no repurchases of series c common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . ( c ) we entered into an agreement with advance/newhouse to repurchase , on a quarterly basis , a number of shares of series c-1 convertible preferred stock convertible into a number of shares of series c common stock . we did not convert any any shares of series c-1 convertible preferred stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 . there are no planned repurchases of series c-1 convertible preferred stock for the first quarter of 2018 as there were no repurchases of series a or series c common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2012 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 and 2017 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td><td>december 312014</td><td>december 312015</td><td>december 312016</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 139.42</td><td>$ 106.23</td><td>$ 82.27</td><td>$ 84.53</td><td>$ 69.01</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 144.61</td><td>$ 116.45</td><td>$ 85.03</td><td>$ 91.70</td><td>$ 78.01</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 143.35</td><td>$ 115.28</td><td>$ 86.22</td><td>$ 91.56</td><td>$ 72.38</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 129.60</td><td>$ 144.36</td><td>$ 143.31</td><td>$ 156.98</td><td>$ 187.47</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 163.16</td><td>$ 186.87</td><td>$ 180.10</td><td>$ 200.65</td><td>$ 208.79</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: as of february 21, 2018, what was the total number of shareholders of series a and b common stock?\nAnswer: 1383.0\nQuestion: including the series c common stock, what becomes this total?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "2797.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4885
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters 2019 exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares will be fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average shares - basic</td><td>156.6</td><td>145.1</td><td>144.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.7</td><td>0.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average shares - diluted</td><td>158.7</td><td>145.8</td><td>144.9</td></tr></table> for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , diluted earnings per share excludes the impact of 0.0 million , 0.0 million , and 4.3 million potential common shares , respectively , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that can be granted under the rdu plan is 28500 . at december 31 , 2013 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus that are outstanding vest daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the 201cdebt pool 201d ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credits the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . payments totaling $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million were made to participants under the rdu plan in april and october 2013 , respectively , in connection with the semi-annual interest payments due . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 1.4 million to the principal component in the year ended december 31 , 2013 as redemption premium equivalents in accordance with the terms of the rdu plan . under the terms of the amended rdu plan , upon the partial redemption of outstanding senior subordinated notes , the rdus ceased to accrue the proportionate related interest component credits . the .\nQuestion: in the year of the 2011, what would have been the diluted earnings per share if the impact of 4.3 million potential common shares had not been excluded?\nAnswer: 149.2\nQuestion: and in the two years subsequent to that one, what was the total effect , in millions , of the dilutive securities?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "2.8"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8825
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfor purposes of determining entergy corporation's relative performance for the 2006-2008 period , the committee used the philadelphia utility index as the peer group . based on market data and the recommendation of management , the committee compared entergy corporation's total shareholder return against the total shareholder return of the companies that comprised the philadelphia utility index . based on a comparison of entergy corporation's performance relative to the philadelphia utility index as described above , the committee concluded that entergy corporation had exceeded the performance targets for the 2006-2008 performance cycle with entergy finishing in the first quartile which resulted in a payment of 250% ( 250 % ) of target ( the maximum amount payable ) . each performance unit was then automatically converted into cash at the rate of $ 83.13 per unit , the closing price of entergy corporation common stock on the last trading day of the performance cycle ( december 31 , 2008 ) , plus dividend equivalents accrued over the three-year performance cycle . see the 2008 option exercises and stock vested table for the amount paid to each of the named executive officers for the 2006-2008 performance unit cycle . stock options the personnel committee and in the case of the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . smith ) , entergy's chief executive officer and the named executive officer's supervisor consider several factors in determining the amount of stock options it will grant under entergy's equity ownership plans to the named executive officers , including : individual performance ; prevailing market practice in stock option grants ; the targeted long-term value created by the use of stock options ; the number of participants eligible for stock options , and the resulting \"burn rate\" ( i.e. , the number of stock options authorized divided by the total number of shares outstanding ) to assess the potential dilutive effect ; and the committee's assessment of other elements of compensation provided to the named executive officer for stock option awards to the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard ) , the committee's assessment of individual performance of each named executive officer done in consultation with entergy corporation's chief executive officer is the most important factor in determining the number of options awarded . the following table sets forth the number of stock options granted to each named executive officer in 2008 . the exercise price for each option was $ 108.20 , which was the closing fair market value of entergy corporation common stock on the date of grant. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>named exeutive officer</td><td>stock options</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>j . wayne leonard</td><td>175000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leo p . denault</td><td>50000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>richard j . smith</td><td>35000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>e . renae conley</td><td>15600</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>hugh t . mcdonald</td><td>7000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>haley fisackerly</td><td>5000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>joseph f . domino</td><td>7000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>roderick k . west</td><td>8000</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>theodore h . bunting jr .</td><td>18000</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>carolyn shanks</td><td>7000</td></tr></table> the option grants awarded to the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard and mr . lewis ) ranged in amount between 5000 and 50000 shares . mr . lewis did not receive any stock option awards in 2008 . in the case of mr . leonard , who received 175000 stock options , the committee took special note of his performance as entergy corporation's chief executive officer . among other things , the committee noted that .\nQuestion: what is the sum of stock options for leo p. denault by the exercise price?\nAnswer: 5410000.0\nQuestion: what is that value simplified?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "5.41"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9614
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninvestment tax credits have been deferred by the regulated utility subsidiaries and are being amortized to income over the average estimated service lives of the related assets . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions as a component of income tax expense and accounts for sales tax collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities on a net basis . see note 14 2014income taxes for additional information . allowance for funds used during construction afudc is a non-cash credit to income with a corresponding charge to utility plant that represents the cost of borrowed funds or a return on equity funds devoted to plant under construction . the regulated utility subsidiaries record afudc to the extent permitted by the pucs . the portion of afudc attributable to borrowed funds is shown as a reduction of interest , net on the consolidated statements of operations . any portion of afudc attributable to equity funds would be included in other , net on the consolidated statements of operations . afudc is provided in the following table for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowance for other funds used during construction</td><td>$ 24</td><td>$ 19</td><td>$ 15</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>allowance for borrowed funds used during construction</td><td>13</td><td>8</td><td>6</td></tr></table> environmental costs the company 2019s water and wastewater operations and the operations of its market-based businesses are subject to u.s . federal , state , local and foreign requirements relating to environmental protection , and as such , the company periodically becomes subject to environmental claims in the normal course of business . environmental expenditures that relate to current operations or provide a future benefit are expensed or capitalized as appropriate . remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued , on an undiscounted basis , when it is probable that these costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated . a conservation agreement entered into by a subsidiary of the company with the national oceanic and atmospheric administration in 2010 and amended in 2017 required the subsidiary to , among other provisions , implement certain measures to protect the steelhead trout and its habitat in the carmel river watershed in the state of california . the subsidiary agreed to pay $ 1 million annually commencing in 2010 with the final payment being made in 2021 . remediation costs accrued amounted to $ 4 million and $ 6 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivative financial instruments for purposes of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates . these derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures . the company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments . all derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value . on the date the derivative contract is entered into , the company may designate the derivative as a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability ( fair-value hedge ) or a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability ( cash-flow hedge ) . changes in the fair value of a fair-value hedge , along with the gain or loss on the underlying hedged item , are recorded in current-period earnings . the gains and losses on the effective portion of cash-flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income , until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows . any ineffective portion of designated cash-flow hedges is recognized in current-period earnings. .\nQuestion: what was the allowance for other funds used during construction in 2018?\nAnswer: 24.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\nAnswer: 15.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the increase over the year?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "9.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2057
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents ( e ) other adjustments primarily include certain historical retention costs , unusual , non-recurring litigation matters , secondary-offering-related expenses and expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago . during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , we recorded ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses of $ 75.0 million . for additional information on the ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses , see note 10 ( stockholder 2019s equity ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . ( f ) includes the impact of consolidating five months for the year ended december 31 , 2015 of kelway 2019s financial results . ( 4 ) non-gaap net income excludes , among other things , charges related to the amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets , non-cash equity-based compensation , acquisition and integration expenses , and gains and losses from the extinguishment of long-term debt . non-gaap net income is considered a non-gaap financial measure . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that non-gaap net income provides meaningful information regarding our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . the following unaudited table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to non-gaap net income for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization of intangibles ( a )</td><td>173.9</td><td>161.2</td><td>161.2</td><td>163.7</td><td>165.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation related to equity investment ( b )</td><td>20.0</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net loss on extinguishments of long-term debt</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>3.7</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>61.2</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f )</td><td>-64.8 ( 64.8 )</td><td>-103.0 ( 103.0 )</td><td>-113.5 ( 113.5 )</td><td>-71.6 ( 71.6 )</td><td>-106.8 ( 106.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-gaap net income ( g )</td><td>$ 503.5</td><td>$ 409.9</td><td>$ 314.3</td><td>$ 247.1</td><td>$ 198.8</td></tr></table> acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 3.7 ( 0.3 ) 61.2 ( 3.3 ) ( 15.6 ) aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f ) ( 64.8 ) ( 103.0 ) ( 113.5 ) ( 71.6 ) ( 106.8 ) non-gaap net income ( g ) $ 503.5 $ 409.9 $ 314.3 $ 247.1 $ 198.8 ( a ) includes amortization expense for acquisition-related intangible assets , primarily customer relationships , customer contracts and trade names . ( b ) represents our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to our acquisition of kelway . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway . ( e ) primarily includes expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago and secondary- offering-related expenses . amount in 2013 primarily relates to ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses . ( f ) based on a normalized effective tax rate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) ( 39.0% ( 39.0 % ) prior to the kelway acquisition ) , except for the non- cash equity-based compensation from our equity investment and the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway , which were tax effected at a rate of 35.4% ( 35.4 % ) . the aggregate adjustment for income taxes also includes a $ 4.0 million deferred tax benefit recorded during the three months and year ended december 31 , 2015 as a result of a tax rate reduction in the united kingdom and additional tax expense during the year ended december 31 , 2015 of $ 3.3 million as a result of recording withholding tax on the unremitted earnings of our canadian subsidiary . additionally , note that certain acquisition costs are non-deductible. .\nQuestion: what was net income in 2015?\nAnswer: 403.1\nQuestion: what was the value of stock compensation?\nAnswer: 31.2\nQuestion: what is the sum total?\nAnswer: 434.3\nQuestion: what is that value times 1000000?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "434300000.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6472
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n112 / sl green realty corp . 2017 annual report 20 . commitments and contingencies legal proceedings as of december a031 , 2017 , the company and the operating partnership were not involved in any material litigation nor , to management 2019s knowledge , was any material litigation threat- ened against us or our portfolio which if adversely determined could have a material adverse impact on us . environmental matters our management believes that the properties are in compliance in all material respects with applicable federal , state and local ordinances and regulations regarding environmental issues . management is not aware of any environmental liability that it believes would have a materially adverse impact on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . management is unaware of any instances in which it would incur significant envi- ronmental cost if any of our properties were sold . employment agreements we have entered into employment agreements with certain exec- utives , which expire between december a02018 and february a02020 . the minimum cash-based compensation , including base sal- ary and guaranteed bonus payments , associated with these employment agreements total $ 5.4 a0million for 2018 . in addition these employment agreements provide for deferred compen- sation awards based on our stock price and which were valued at $ 1.6 a0million on the grant date . the value of these awards may change based on fluctuations in our stock price . insurance we maintain 201call-risk 201d property and rental value coverage ( includ- ing coverage regarding the perils of flood , earthquake and terrorism , excluding nuclear , biological , chemical , and radiological terrorism ( 201cnbcr 201d ) ) , within three property insurance programs and liability insurance . separate property and liability coverage may be purchased on a stand-alone basis for certain assets , such as the development of one vanderbilt . additionally , our captive insurance company , belmont insurance company , or belmont , pro- vides coverage for nbcr terrorist acts above a specified trigger , although if belmont is required to pay a claim under our insur- ance policies , we would ultimately record the loss to the extent of belmont 2019s required payment . however , there is no assurance that in the future we will be able to procure coverage at a reasonable cost . further , if we experience losses that are uninsured or that exceed policy limits , we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those plan trustees adopted a rehabilitation plan consistent with this requirement . no surcharges have been paid to the pension plan as of december a031 , 2017 . for the pension plan years ended june a030 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , the plan received contributions from employers totaling $ 257.8 a0million , $ 249.5 a0million , and $ 221.9 a0million . our contributions to the pension plan represent less than 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) of total contributions to the plan . the health plan was established under the terms of collective bargaining agreements between the union , the realty advisory board on labor relations , inc . and certain other employees . the health plan provides health and other benefits to eligible participants employed in the building service industry who are covered under collective bargaining agreements , or other writ- ten agreements , with the union . the health plan is administered by a board of trustees with equal representation by the employ- ers and the union and operates under employer identification number a013-2928869 . the health plan receives contributions in accordance with collective bargaining agreements or participa- tion agreements . generally , these agreements provide that the employers contribute to the health plan at a fixed rate on behalf of each covered employee . for the health plan years ended , june a030 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , the plan received contributions from employers totaling $ 1.3 a0billion , $ 1.2 a0billion and $ 1.1 a0billion , respectively . our contributions to the health plan represent less than 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) of total contributions to the plan . contributions we made to the multi-employer plans for the years ended december a031 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are included in the table below ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benefit plan</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension plan</td><td>$ 3856</td><td>$ 3979</td><td>$ 2732</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>health plan</td><td>11426</td><td>11530</td><td>8736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other plans</td><td>1463</td><td>1583</td><td>5716</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total plan contributions</td><td>$ 16745</td><td>$ 17092</td><td>$ 17184</td></tr></table> 401 ( k ) plan in august a01997 , we implemented a 401 ( k ) a0savings/retirement plan , or the 401 ( k ) a0plan , to cover eligible employees of ours , and any designated affiliate . the 401 ( k ) a0plan permits eligible employees to defer up to 15% ( 15 % ) of their annual compensation , subject to certain limitations imposed by the code . the employees 2019 elective deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contribution to the 401 ( k ) a0plan . during a02003 , we amended our 401 ( k ) a0plan to pro- vide for discretionary matching contributions only . for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a matching contribution equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 6% ( 6 % ) of annual compensation was made . for the year ended december a031 , 2017 , we made a matching contribution of $ 728782 . for the years ended december a031 , 2016 and 2015 , we made matching contribu- tions of $ 566000 and $ 550000 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what were the pension plan contributions in 2016?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "249.5"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2639
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2016 , and 2015 included $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2016 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 461</td><td>$ 221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>390</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>348</td><td>179</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>285</td><td>187</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>245</td><td>158</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1314</td><td>417</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 3043</td><td>$ 1355</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-250 ( 250 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1105</td></tr></table> approximately 96% ( 96 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 535 million in 2016 , $ 590 million in 2015 , and $ 593 million in 2014 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 6% ( 6 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2016 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 290 million to $ 317 million . we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .\nQuestion: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases?\nAnswer: 3043.0\nQuestion: what is it for capital leases?\nAnswer: 1355.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of operating to capital?\nAnswer: 2.24576\nQuestion: what is that times 100?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "224.57565"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3732
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmeet customer needs and put us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical issues and events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2010 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 2.5 billion , including expenditures for ptc , which may be revised if business conditions or new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan . 2022 positive train control ( ptc ) 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 200 million during 2010 on the development of ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the fra . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions but expect volume to increase from 2009 levels . in addition , we anticipate continued pricing opportunities and further productivity improvements . results of operations operating revenues millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2008 v 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>$ 15486</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>797</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>$ 16283</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td><td>10% ( 10 % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues on a percentage-of-completion basis as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .\nQuestion: what is the total capital investments in 2010, in billions?\nAnswer: 2.5\nQuestion: what about in millions?\nAnswer: 2500.0\nQuestion: what portion of total capital investments is related to development of ptc?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.08"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2914
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncosts . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the natural gas marketed from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: -74.0\nQuestion: what is the natural gas marketed in 2010?\nAnswer: 919.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-0.08052"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3111
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest increased $ 64 million , or 9.8% ( 9.8 % ) , to $ 710 million in 2013 from $ 646 million in 2012 primarily due to special charges of $ 92 million to recognize post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consists principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating income in 2012 consisted principally of a $ 280 million special credit related to the settlement of a commercial dispute partially offset by net foreign currency losses . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension and postretirement benefits</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -66 ( 66 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>1733</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td><td>1951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>170</td><td>67</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td><td>$ 2179</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify such financing or facility agreement and the debtors believed that it was probable the motion would be approved , and there was sufficient information to estimate the claim . see note 2 to american 2019s consolidated financial statements in part ii , item 8b for further information . ( 3 ) pursuant to the plan , the debtors agreed to allow certain post-petition unsecured claims on obligations . as a result , during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , american recorded reorganization charges to adjust estimated allowed claim amounts previously recorded on rejected special facility revenue bonds of $ 180 million , allowed general unsecured claims related to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at jfk , and rejected bonds that financed certain improvements at ord , which are included in the table above . ( 4 ) the plan allowed unsecured creditors receiving aag series a preferred stock a conversion discount of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) . accordingly , american recorded the fair value of such discount upon the confirmation of the plan by the bankruptcy court. .\nQuestion: what was the value of total re-organization costs in 2013?\nAnswer: 2640.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2012?\nAnswer: 2179.0\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\nAnswer: 461.0\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.21156"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5977
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmfc 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 175 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for air and missile defense programs ( thaad and pac-3 ) due to increased risk retirements and volume ; about $ 85 million for fire control programs ( sniper ae , lantirn ae and apache ) due to increased risk retirements and higher volume ; and approximately $ 75 million for tactical missile programs ( hellfire and various programs ) due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 45 million for the resolution of contractual matters in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 15 million for various technical services programs due to lower volume partially offset by increased risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog increased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders on the thaad program and lower sales volume compared to new orders on certain fire control systems programs in 2013 , partially offset by lower orders on technical services programs and certain tactical missile programs . backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales to be flat to slightly down in 2014 compared to 2013 , primarily due to a decrease in net sales on technical services programs partially offset by an increase in net sales from missiles and fire control programs . operating profit is expected to decrease in the high single digit percentage range , driven by a reduction in expected risk retirements in 2014 . accordingly , operating profit margin is expected to slightly decline from 2013 . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , lcs , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system , and mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td><td>$ 7132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>905</td><td>737</td><td>645</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>10800</td><td>10700</td><td>10500</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume .\nQuestion: what was the operating profit in 2013?\nAnswer: 905.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2012?\nAnswer: 737.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 1642.0\nQuestion: what is the sum including operating profit from 2011?\nAnswer: 2287.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum divided by 3?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "762.33333"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10098
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( percents )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.00% ( 2.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.31</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>22.26</td><td>22.91</td><td>21.68</td></tr></table> pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and .\nQuestion: what was the volatility in 2017?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "22.91"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7705
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrestrictive covenants the terms of the 2017 credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and dispose of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges , a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that , we will not during any time when a default is continuing , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable the company to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , we were in compliance with all such covenants . junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures in june a02005 , the company and the operating partnership issued $ 100.0 a0million in unsecured trust preferred securities through a newly formed trust , sl a0green capital trust i , or the trust , which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the operating partnership . the securities mature in 2035 and bear interest at a floating rate of 125 a0basis points over the three-month libor . interest payments may be deferred for a period of up to eight consecutive quarters if the operating partnership exercises its right to defer such payments . the trust preferred securities are redeemable at the option of the operating partnership , in whole or in part , with no prepayment premium . we do not consolidate the trust even though it is a variable interest entity as we are not the primary beneficiary . because the trust is not consolidated , we have recorded the debt on our consolidated balance sheets and the related payments are classified as interest expense . interest rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our variable rate debt . our exposure to interest rate fluctuations are managed through either the use of interest rate derivative instru- ments and/or through our variable rate debt and preferred equity investments . a hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for a02017 would increase our consolidated annual interest cost , net of interest income from variable rate debt and preferred equity investments , by $ 2.7 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by $ 17.2 a0million . at december a031 , 2017 , 61.5% ( 61.5 % ) of our $ 2.1 a0bil- lion debt and preferred equity portfolio is indexed to libor . we recognize most derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges are adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is considered a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recog- nized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is immediately recognized in a0earnings . our long-term debt of $ 4.3 a0billion bears interest at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . our variable rate debt and variable rate joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2017 bore interest based on a spread of libor plus 100 a0basis points to libor plus 415 a0basis points . contractual obligations the combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , the 2017 credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as-of-right extension options and put options , estimated interest expense , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2017 are as follows ( in a0thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages and other loans</td><td>$ 153593</td><td>$ 42289</td><td>$ 703018</td><td>$ 11656</td><td>$ 208003</td><td>$ 1656623</td><td>$ 2775182</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mra facilities</td><td>90809</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>90809</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>40000</td><td>40000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unsecured term loans</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>1500000</td><td>1500000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>800000</td><td>100000</td><td>1400000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capital lease</td><td>2387</td><td>2411</td><td>2620</td><td>2794</td><td>2794</td><td>819894</td><td>832900</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ground leases</td><td>31049</td><td>31066</td><td>31436</td><td>31628</td><td>29472</td><td>703254</td><td>857905</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>226815</td><td>218019</td><td>184376</td><td>163648</td><td>155398</td><td>281694</td><td>1229950</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>200250</td><td>717682</td><td>473809</td><td>449740</td><td>223330</td><td>2119481</td><td>4184292</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total</td><td>$ 954903</td><td>$ 1011467</td><td>$ 1645259</td><td>$ 659466</td><td>$ 1418997</td><td>$ 7320946</td><td>$ 13011038</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total of estimated interest expense payments in 2018?\nAnswer: 226815.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2019?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "218019.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1868
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portu- guese and latin american markets and although pullmantur has diversified its passenger sourcing over the past few years , spain still represents pullmantur 2019s largest market . as previously disclosed , during 2012 european economies continued to demonstrate insta- bility in light of heightened concerns over sovereign debt issues as well as the impact of proposed auster- ity measures on certain markets . the spanish econ- omy was more severely impacted than many other economies and there is significant uncertainty as to when it will recover . in addition , the impact of the costa concordia incident has had a more lingering effect than expected and the impact in future years is uncertain . these factors were identified in the past as significant risks which could lead to the impairment of pullmantur 2019s goodwill . more recently , the spanish economy has progressively worsened and forecasts suggest the challenging operating environment will continue for an extended period of time . the unemployment rate in spain reached 26% ( 26 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is expected to rise further in 2013 . the international monetary fund , which had projected gdp growth of 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) a year ago , revised its 2013 gdp projections downward for spain to a contraction of 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and further reduced it to a contraction of 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) in january of 2013 . during the latter half of 2012 new austerity measures , such as increases to the value added tax , cuts to benefits , the phasing out of exemptions and the suspension of government bonuses , were implemented by the spanish government . we believe these austerity measures are having a larger impact on consumer confidence and discretionary spending than previously anticipated . as a result , there has been a significant deterioration in bookings from guests sourced from spain during the 2013 wave season . the combination of all of these factors has caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the expectations regarding future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined the implied fair value of goodwill for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 million and rec- ognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . there have been no goodwill impairment charges related to the pullmantur reporting unit in prior periods . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) perform worse than contemplated in our discounted cash flow model , or if there are material changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impair- ment analyses , especially in net yields , an additional impairment charge of the pullmantur reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 218883</td><td>$ 225679</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>impairment charge</td><td>-17356 ( 17356 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>3339</td><td>-6796 ( 6796 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 204866</td><td>$ 218883</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of our trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . these trademarks and trade names relate to pullmantur and we have used a discount rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . as described in note 3 . goodwill , the continued deterioration of the spanish economy caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections for the pullmantur reporting unit , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the timing of future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined that the fair value of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names no longer exceeded their carrying value . accordingly , we recog- nized an impairment charge of approximately $ 17.4 million to write down trademarks and trade names to their fair value of $ 204.9 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) 0494.indd 76 3/27/13 12:53 pm .\nQuestion: what was the change in the value of intangible assets from 2011 to 2012?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-14017.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5352
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhumana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in any spe transactions . the adoption of fin 46 or fin 46-r did not have a material impact on our financial position , results of operations , or cash flows . in december 2004 , the fasb issued statement no . 123r , share-based payment , or statement 123r , which requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of stock-based compensation . this requirement represents a significant change because fixed-based stock option awards , a predominate form of stock compensation for us , were not recognized as compensation expense under apb 25 . statement 123r requires the cost of the award , as determined on the date of grant at fair value , be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award ( usually the vesting period ) . the grant-date fair value of the award will be estimated using option-pricing models . we are required to adopt statement 123r no later than july 1 , 2005 under one of three transition methods , including a prospective , retrospective and combination approach . we previously disclosed on page 67 the effect of expensing stock options under a fair value approach using the black-scholes pricing model for 2004 , 2003 and 2002 . we currently are evaluating all of the provisions of statement 123r and the expected effect on us including , among other items , reviewing compensation strategies related to stock-based awards , selecting an option pricing model and determining the transition method . in march 2004 , the fasb issued eitf issue no . 03-1 , or eitf 03-1 , the meaning of other-than- temporary impairment and its application to certain investments . eitf 03-1 includes new guidance for evaluating and recording impairment losses on certain debt and equity investments when the fair value of the investment security is less than its carrying value . in september 2004 , the fasb delayed the previously scheduled third quarter 2004 effective date until the issuance of additional implementation guidance , expected in 2005 . upon issuance of a final standard , we will evaluate the impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations . 3 . acquisitions on february 16 , 2005 , we acquired careplus health plans of florida , or careplus , as well as its affiliated 10 medical centers and pharmacy company . careplus provides medicare advantage hmo plans and benefits to medicare eligible members in miami-dade , broward and palm beach counties . this acquisition enhances our medicare market position in south florida . we paid approximately $ 450 million in cash including estimated transaction costs , subject to a balance sheet settlement process with a nine month claims run-out period . we currently are in the process of allocating the purchase price to the net tangible and intangible assets . on april 1 , 2004 , we acquired ochsner health plan , or ochsner , from the ochsner clinic foundation . ochsner is a louisiana health benefits company offering network-based managed care plans to employer-groups and medicare eligible members . this acquisition enabled us to enter a new market with significant market share which should facilitate new sales opportunities in this and surrounding markets , including houston , texas . we paid $ 157.1 million in cash , including transaction costs . the fair value of the tangible assets ( liabilities ) as of the acquisition date are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 15270</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities</td><td>84527</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>premiums receivable and other current assets</td><td>20616</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property and equipment and other assets</td><td>6847</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>medical and other expenses payable</td><td>-71063 ( 71063 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-21604 ( 21604 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>-82 ( 82 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net tangible assets acquired</td><td>$ 34511</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the sum of cash and cash equivalents and investment securities?\nAnswer: 99797.0\nQuestion: what is the sum of premiums receivable and other current assets plus property, equipment and other assets?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "27463.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8225
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations . the company believes that adequate provisions have been made for income taxes for all periods through december 31 , 2010 . 12 . stock-based compensation the company recognized stock-based compensation of $ 52.6 million , $ 60.7 million and $ 54.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 included $ 6.9 million related to the modification of the vesting and exercise terms for certain employee 2019s equity awards . the company did not capitalize any stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . summary of stock-based compensation plans 2014the company maintains equity incentive plans that provide for the grant of stock-based awards to its directors , officers and employees . under the 2007 equity incentive plan ( 201c2007 plan 201d ) , which provides for the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options , as well as restricted stock units , restricted stock and other stock-based awards , exercise prices in the case of non-qualified and incentive stock options are not less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant . equity awards typically vest ratably over various periods , generally four years , and generally expire ten years from the date of grant . stock options 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , the company had the ability to grant stock-based awards with respect to an aggregate of 22.0 million shares of common stock under the 2007 plan . the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the table below . the risk-free treasury rate is based on the u.s . treasury yield in effect at the accounting measurement date . the expected life ( estimated period of time outstanding ) was estimated using the vesting term and historical exercise behavior of company employees . the expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the expected life of the stock options . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.39% ( 2.39 % )</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.04% ( 2.04 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % ) 2013 3.05% ( 3.05 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.35% ( 2.35 % )</td><td>1.71% ( 1.71 % )</td><td>1.89% ( 1.89 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4.60 years</td><td>4.00 years</td><td>4.00 years</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.11% ( 37.11 % ) 2013 37.48% ( 37.48 % )</td><td>36.00% ( 36.00 % ) 2013 36.63% ( 36.63 % )</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % ) 2013 35.30% ( 35.30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.14% ( 37.14 % )</td><td>36.23% ( 36.23 % )</td><td>29.10% ( 29.10 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant date fair value per share during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 15.03 , $ 8.90 and $ 9.55 , respectively . the intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 62.7 million , $ 40.1 million and $ 99.1 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was approximately $ 27.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $ 129.1 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company realized approximately $ 0.3 million of state tax benefits from the exercise of stock options. .\nQuestion: what was the net change of the intrinsic value of stock options from 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: 22.6\nQuestion: what was this value in 2009?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "40.1"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1935
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if sustaining those positions is more likely than not . changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which a change in judgment occurs . the company records penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in income taxes in the company 2019s consolidated statements of income . changes in accounting principles business combinations and noncontrolling interests on january 1 , 2009 , the company adopted revised principles related to business combinations and noncontrolling interests . the revised principle on business combinations applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control over one or more businesses . it requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired , the liabilities assumed , and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date , measured at their fair values as of that date . business combinations achieved in stages require recognition of the identifiable assets and liabilities , as well as the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree , at the full amounts of their fair values when control is obtained . this revision also changes the requirements for recognizing assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies , and requires direct acquisition costs to be expensed . in addition , it provides certain changes to income tax accounting for business combinations which apply to both new and previously existing business combinations . in april 2009 , additional guidance was issued which revised certain business combination guidance related to accounting for contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination . the company has adopted this guidance in conjunction with the adoption of the revised principles related to business combinations . the adoption of the revised principles related to business combinations has not had a material impact on the consolidated financial statements . the revised principle related to noncontrolling interests establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . the revised principle clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as a separate component of equity in the consolidated statements of financial position . the revised principle requires retrospective adjustments , for all periods presented , of stockholders 2019 equity and net income for noncontrolling interests . in addition to these financial reporting changes , the revised principle provides for significant changes in accounting related to changes in ownership of noncontrolling interests . changes in aon 2019s controlling financial interests in consolidated subsidiaries that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions similar to treasury stock transactions . if a change in ownership of a consolidated subsidiary results in a loss of control and deconsolidation , any retained ownership interests are remeasured at fair value with the gain or loss reported in net income . in previous periods , noncontrolling interests for operating subsidiaries were reported in other general expenses in the consolidated statements of income . prior period amounts have been restated to conform to the current year 2019s presentation . the principal effect on the prior years 2019 balance sheets related to the adoption of the new guidance related to noncontrolling interests is summarized as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity as previously reported</td><td>$ 5310</td><td>$ 6221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase for reclassification of non-controlling interests</td><td>105</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>equity as adjusted</td><td>$ 5415</td><td>$ 6261</td></tr></table> the revised principle also requires that net income be adjusted to include the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests and a new separate caption for net income attributable to aon stockholders be presented in the consolidated statements of income . the adoption of this new guidance increased net income by $ 16 million and $ 13 million for 2008 and 2007 , respectively . net .\nQuestion: what was the reclassification of non-controlling interests in 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "105.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10948
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin april 2009 , the fasb issued additional guidance under asc 820 which provides guidance on estimat- ing the fair value of an asset or liability ( financial or nonfinancial ) when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased , and on identifying transactions that are not orderly . the application of the requirements of this guidance did not have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements . in august 2009 , the fasb issued asu 2009-05 , 201cmeasuring liabilities at fair value , 201d which further amends asc 820 by providing clarification for cir- cumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available . the company included the disclosures required by this guidance in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in june 2006 , the fasb issued guidance under asc 740 , 201cincome taxes 201d ( formerly fin 48 ) . this guid- ance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in tax returns . specifically , the financial statement effects of a tax position may be recognized only when it is determined that it is 201cmore likely than not 201d that , based on its technical merits , the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax authority . the amount recognized shall be measured as the largest amount of tax benefits that exceed a 50% ( 50 % ) probability of being recognized . this guidance also expands income tax disclosure requirements . international paper applied the provisions of this guidance begin- ning in the first quarter of 2007 . the adoption of this guidance resulted in a charge to the beginning bal- ance of retained earnings of $ 94 million at the date of adoption . note 3 industry segment information financial information by industry segment and geo- graphic area for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 is presented on pages 47 and 48 . effective january 1 , 2008 , the company changed its method of allocating corpo- rate overhead expenses to its business segments to increase the expense amounts allocated to these businesses in reports reviewed by its chief executive officer to facilitate performance comparisons with other companies . accordingly , the company has revised its presentation of industry segment operat- ing profit to reflect this change in allocation method , and has adjusted all comparative prior period information on this basis . note 4 earnings per share attributable to international paper company common shareholders basic earnings per common share from continuing operations are computed by dividing earnings from continuing operations by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding . diluted earnings per common share from continuing oper- ations are computed assuming that all potentially dilutive securities , including 201cin-the-money 201d stock options , were converted into common shares at the beginning of each year . in addition , the computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the inclusion of contingently convertible securities in periods when dilutive . a reconciliation of the amounts included in the computation of basic earnings per common share from continuing operations , and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations is as fol- in millions except per share amounts 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 663</td><td>$ -1269 ( 1269 )</td><td>$ 1215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations 2013 assumingdilution</td><td>$ 663</td><td>$ -1269 ( 1269 )</td><td>$ 1215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average common shares outstanding</td><td>425.3</td><td>421.0</td><td>428.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of dilutive securities restricted performance share plan ( a )</td><td>2.7</td><td>2013</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stock options ( b )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>0.4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution</td><td>428.0</td><td>421.0</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations</td><td>$ 1.56</td><td>$ -3.02 ( 3.02 )</td><td>$ 2.83</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations</td><td>$ 1.55</td><td>$ -3.02 ( 3.02 )</td><td>$ 2.81</td></tr></table> average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution 428.0 421.0 433.0 basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations $ 1.56 $ ( 3.02 ) $ 2.83 diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations $ 1.55 $ ( 3.02 ) $ 2.81 ( a ) securities are not included in the table in periods when anti- dilutive . ( b ) options to purchase 22.2 million , 25.1 million and 17.5 million shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , were not included in the computation of diluted common shares outstanding because their exercise price exceeded the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for each respective reporting date . note 5 restructuring and other charges this footnote discusses restructuring and other charges recorded for each of the three years included in the period ended december 31 , 2009 . it .\nQuestion: what is the sum of earnings (loss) from continuing operations in 2008 and 2009?\nAnswer: -606.0\nQuestion: what are earnings (loss) in 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1215.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1095
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) mid cap 400 index and the russell 1000 index , both of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/11</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/12</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/13</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/14</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/15</td><td>12/31/16</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>a . o . smith corporation</td><td>100.0</td><td>159.5</td><td>275.8</td><td>292.0</td><td>401.0</td><td>501.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p mid cap 400 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>117.9</td><td>157.4</td><td>172.8</td><td>169.0</td><td>204.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>116.4</td><td>155.0</td><td>175.4</td><td>177.0</td><td>198.4</td></tr></table> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 smith ( a o ) corp s&p midcap 400 index russell 1000 index .\nQuestion: what was the a. o. smith corporation share price as of 12/31/16?\nAnswer: 501.4\nQuestion: and the change in price between 12/31/11 and this date?\nAnswer: 401.4\nQuestion: so what was the percentage return during this time?\nAnswer: 4.014\nQuestion: and the price for russell 1000 index as of 12/31/16?\nAnswer: 198.4\nQuestion: and the change in price from 12/31/11?\nAnswer: 98.4\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change during this time?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.984"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4718
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncapital resources and liquidity capital resources overview capital is generally generated via earnings from operating businesses . this is augmented through issuance of common stock , convertible preferred stock , preferred stock , subordinated debt , and equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans . capital is used primarily to support assets in the company 2019s businesses and to absorb unexpected market , credit or operational losses . the company 2019s uses of capital , particularly to pay dividends and repurchase common stock , became severely restricted during the latter half of 2008 . see 201cthe company , 201d 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 2013 events in 2008 , 201d 201ctarp and other regulatory programs , 201d 201crisk factors 201d and 201ccommon equity 201d on pages 2 , 9 , 44 , 47 and 95 , respectively . citigroup 2019s capital management framework is designed to ensure that citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with the company 2019s risk profile , all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines , and external rating agency considerations . the capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated , legal entity , and country level . senior management oversees the capital management process of citigroup and its principal subsidiaries mainly through citigroup 2019s finance and asset and liability committee ( finalco ) . the committee is composed of the senior-most management of citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity items . among other things , the committee 2019s responsibilities include : determining the financial structure of citigroup and its principal subsidiaries ; ensuring that citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized ; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for citigroup and individual businesses ; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for citigroup ; and monitoring interest-rate risk , corporate and bank liquidity , the impact of currency translation on non-u.s . earnings and capital . the finalco has established capital targets for citigroup and for significant subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2008 , these targets exceeded the regulatory standards . common and preferred stock issuances as discussed under 201cevents in 2008 201d on page 9 , during 2008 , the company issued $ 45 billion in preferred stock and warrants under tarp , $ 12.5 billion of convertible preferred stock in a private offering , $ 11.7 billion of non-convertible preferred stock in public offerings , $ 3.2 billion of convertible preferred stock in public offerings , and $ 4.9 billion of common stock in public offerings . on january 23 , 2009 , pursuant to our prior agreement with the purchasers of the $ 12.5 billion convertible preferred stock issued in the private offering , the conversion price was reset from $ 31.62 per share to $ 26.35 per share . the reset will result in citigroup 2019s issuing approximately 79 million additional common shares if converted . there will be no impact to net income , total stockholders 2019 equity or capital ratios due to the reset . however , the reset will result in a reclassification from retained earnings to additional paid-in capital of $ 1.2 billion to reflect the benefit of the reset to the preferred stockholders . capital ratios citigroup is subject to risk-based capital ratio guidelines issued by the federal reserve board ( frb ) . capital adequacy is measured via two risk- based ratios , tier 1 and total capital ( tier 1 + tier 2 capital ) . tier 1 capital is considered core capital while total capital also includes other items such as subordinated debt and loan loss reserves . both measures of capital are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets . risk-weighted assets are measured primarily on their perceived credit risk and include certain off-balance-sheet exposures , such as unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit , and the notional amounts of derivative and foreign- exchange contracts . citigroup is also subject to the leverage ratio requirement , a non-risk-based asset ratio , which is defined as tier 1 capital as a percentage of adjusted average assets . to be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , a bank holding company must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) , and a leverage ratio of at least 3% ( 3 % ) , and not be subject to an frb directive to maintain higher capital levels . as noted in the following table , citigroup maintained a 201cwell capitalized 201d position during both 2008 and 2007 . citigroup regulatory capital ratios at year end 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>at year end</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>11.92% ( 11.92 % )</td><td>7.12% ( 7.12 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 )</td><td>15.70</td><td>10.70</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>leverage ( 1 )</td><td>6.08</td><td>4.03</td></tr></table> leverage ( 1 ) 6.08 4.03 ( 1 ) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets . events occurring during 2008 , including the transactions with the u.s . government , affected citigroup 2019s capital ratios , and any additional u.s . government financial involvement with the company could further impact the company 2019s capital ratios . in addition , future operations will affect capital levels , and changes that the fasb has proposed regarding off-balance-sheet assets , consolidation and sale treatment could also have an impact on capital ratios . see also note 23 to the consolidated financial statements on page 175 , including 201cfunding liquidity facilities and subordinate interests . 201d .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of the citigroup regulatory capital ratios total capital (tier 1 and tier 2) from 2007 to 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "5.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6737
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>48</td><td>42</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>23</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .\nQuestion: what was the change in the length of the cash conversion cycle from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: 2.0\nQuestion: and what was that length in 2013?\nAnswer: 21.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2013 length of the cash conversion cycle?\nAnswer: 0.09524\nQuestion: and how much is that in percentage?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "9.52381"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8098
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfederal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2009 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>96454</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-80258 ( 80258 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>756703</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>101321</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11766 ( 11766 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>846258</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>103.698</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11869 ( 11869 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>$ 938087</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: for the years of 2006 and 2007, what was the combined total of additions, in thousands?\nAnswer: 197775.0\nQuestion: and what were those additions in 2008?\nAnswer: 103.698\nQuestion: including, then, 2008, what becomes that total of additions?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "301473.0"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.