Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA1899	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninterest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .\nQuestion: what is the interest expense in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "26.4" } ]
CONVFINQA5774	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nappropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.5 billion for 2015 , $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , and $ 2.3 billion for 2013 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2015 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td><td>dec . 31 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 743</td><td>$ 877</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>434</td><td>412</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>391</td><td>409</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest payable</td><td>208</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>181</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>105</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends payable [a]</td><td>-</td><td>438</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>550</td><td>640</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and other current liabilities</td><td>$ 2612</td><td>$ 3303</td></tr></table> [a] beginning in 2015 , the timing of the dividend declaration and payable dates was aligned to occur within the same quarter . the 2015 dividends paid amount includes the fourth quarter 2014 dividend of $ 438 million , which was paid on january 2 , 2015 , the first quarter 2015 dividend of $ 484 million , which was paid on march 30 , 2015 , the second quarter 2015 dividend of $ 479 million , which was paid on june 30 , 2015 , the third quarter 2015 dividend of $ 476 million , which was paid on september 30 , 2015 , as well as the fourth quarter 2015 dividend of $ 467 million , which was paid on december 30 , 2015 . 14 . financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements . market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item . we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements . at december 31 , 2015 , and 2014 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities . interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period . we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings . we employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix . in addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities . swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates . we account for swaps as fair value hedges using the short-cut method ; therefore , we do not record any ineffectiveness within our .\nQuestion: what was the value of equipment rents payable in 2015?\nAnswer: 105.0\nQuestion: what was the 2014 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "100.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7615	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 32452</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>35138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>50421</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>39067</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>26301</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>137858</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>321237</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>73512</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 247725</td></tr></table> grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the amount of the net regulatory asset in 2008, in millions?\nAnswer: 19.2\nQuestion: and what was it in 2007, also in millions?\nAnswer: 36.6\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in amount over the year, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-17.4" } ]
CONVFINQA4439	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmasco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .\nQuestion: what was the value of accruals for warranties issued during the year 2012?\nAnswer: 42.0\nQuestion: what was the value of accruals for warranties issued during the year 2011?\nAnswer: 28.0\nQuestion: what was the net value change?\nAnswer: 14.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.5" } ]
CONVFINQA9424	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td><td>10/30/2016</td><td>10/29/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>171.03</td><td>207.01</td><td>165.34</td><td>293.64</td><td>586.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.18</td><td>149.14</td><td>156.89</td><td>163.97</td><td>202.72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>131.94</td><td>167.25</td><td>160.80</td><td>193.36</td><td>288.96</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .\nQuestion: what was the value of the s&p 500 in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "156.89" } ]
CONVFINQA8068	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nproceeds from the sale of equity securities . from time to time , we raise funds through public offerings of our equity securities . in addition , we receive proceeds from sales of our equity securities pursuant to our stock option and stock purchase plans . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we received approximately $ 40.6 million in proceeds from sales of shares of our class a common stock and the common stock of atc mexico pursuant to our stock option and stock purchase plans . financing activities during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we took several actions to increase our financial flexibility and reduce our interest costs . new credit facility . in may 2004 , we refinanced our previous credit facility with a new $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility . at closing , we received $ 685.5 million of net proceeds from the borrowings under the new facility , after deducting related expenses and fees , approximately $ 670.0 million of which we used to repay principal and interest under the previous credit facility . we used the remaining net proceeds of $ 15.5 million for general corporate purposes , including the repurchase of other outstanding debt securities . the new credit facility consists of the following : 2022 $ 400.0 million in undrawn revolving loan commitments , against which approximately $ 19.3 million of undrawn letters of credit were outstanding at december 31 , 2004 , maturing on february 28 , 2011 ; 2022 a $ 300.0 million term loan a , which is fully drawn , maturing on february 28 , 2011 ; and 2022 a $ 398.0 million term loan b , which is fully drawn , maturing on august 31 , 2011 . the new credit facility extends the previous credit facility maturity dates from 2007 to 2011 for a majority of the borrowings outstanding , subject to earlier maturity upon the occurrence of certain events described below , and allows us to use credit facility borrowings and internally generated funds to repurchase other indebtedness without additional lender approval . the new credit facility is guaranteed by us and is secured by a pledge of substantially all of our assets . the maturity date for term loan a and any outstanding revolving loans will be accelerated to august 15 , 2008 , and the maturity date for term loan b will be accelerated to october 31 , 2008 , if ( 1 ) on or prior to august 1 , 2008 , our 93 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior notes have not been ( a ) refinanced with parent company indebtedness having a maturity date of february 28 , 2012 or later or with loans under the new credit facility , or ( b ) repaid , prepaid , redeemed , repurchased or otherwise retired , and ( 2 ) our consolidated leverage ratio ( total parent company debt to annualized operating cash flow ) at june 30 , 2008 is greater than 4.50 to 1.00 . if this were to occur , the payments due in 2008 for term loan a and term loan b would be $ 225.0 million and $ 386.0 million , respectively . note offerings . during 2004 , we raised approximately $ 1.1 billion in net proceeds from the sale of debt securities through institutional private placements as follows ( in millions ) : debt security date of offering principal amount approximate net proceeds . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>debt security</td><td>date of offering</td><td>principal amount</td><td>approximate net proceeds</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012</td><td>february 2004</td><td>$ 225.0</td><td>$ 221.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>3.00% ( 3.00 % ) convertible notes due august 15 2012</td><td>august 2004</td><td>345.0</td><td>335.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012</td><td>october 2004</td><td>300.0</td><td>292.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012</td><td>december 2004</td><td>200.0</td><td>199.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>-</td><td>$ 1070.0</td><td>$ 1050.2</td></tr></table> 2022 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes offering . in february 2004 , we sold $ 225.0 million principal amount of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 through an institutional private placement . the 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes mature on may 1 , 2012 , and interest is payable semiannually in arrears on may 1 and november 1 of each year. .\nQuestion: what is the principal amount for the 7.50% senior notes due 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "225.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1020	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart a0ii item a05 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201ctfx . 201d as of february 19 , 2019 , we had 473 holders of record of our common stock . a substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are beneficial owners whose shares are held by brokers and other financial institutions for the accounts of beneficial owners . stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2013 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>124</td><td>143</td><td>177</td><td>275</td><td>288</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>114</td><td>115</td><td>129</td><td>157</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>126</td><td>134</td><td>142</td><td>186</td><td>213</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 126 134 142 186 213 .\nQuestion: what was the price of teleflex in 2014?\nAnswer: 124.0\nQuestion: what was the initial investment?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what is the difference of the price and initial investment?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "24.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8233	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g and 4g network build outs . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and , as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany and france , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage among their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 104470 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and reduce the likelihood of churn . our master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced colocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 45310 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the revenue generated from newly acquired or constructed sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass-through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>65</td><td>11595</td><td>900</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asia</td><td>43865</td><td>2330</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>665</td><td>4910</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>715</td><td>6535</td><td>5800</td></tr></table> property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment selling , general , administrative and development expenses as we increase our presence in our existing markets or expand into new markets . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our sites but can be temporarily diluted by our development activities. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of new sites acquired and constructed during 2016 in us and asia?\nAnswer: 43930.0\nQuestion: what is the sum including emea?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "44595.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6430	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\neog utilized average prices per acre from comparable market transactions and estimated discounted cash flows as the basis for determining the fair value of unproved and proved properties , respectively , received in non-cash property exchanges . see note 10 . fair value of debt . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , eog had outstanding $ 6040 million and $ 6390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes , which had estimated fair values of approximately $ 6027 million and $ 6602 million , respectively . the estimated fair value of debt was based upon quoted market prices and , where such prices were not available , other observable ( level 2 ) inputs regarding interest rates available to eog at year-end . 14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2018 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 139 million were written down to their fair value of $ 18 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 121 million . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . impairments in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 173 million , $ 211 million and $ 291 million during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount at beginning of period</td><td>$ 946848</td><td>$ 912926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred</td><td>79057</td><td>54764</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled ( 1 )</td><td>-70829 ( 70829 )</td><td>-61871 ( 61871 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>36622</td><td>34708</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions</td><td>-38932 ( 38932 )</td><td>-9818 ( 9818 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign currency translations</td><td>1611</td><td>16139</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>carrying amount at end of period</td><td>$ 954377</td><td>$ 946848</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>current portion</td><td>$ 26214</td><td>$ 19259</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noncurrent portion</td><td>$ 928163</td><td>$ 927589</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .\nQuestion: how much did the liabilities incurred in 2018 represent in relation to the ones incurred in 2017?\nAnswer: 1.44359\nQuestion: and what is this value excluding the portion equivalent to the 2017 liabilities?\nAnswer: 0.44359\nQuestion: and in the first year of that period, what was the beginning carrying amount, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "912.926" } ]
CONVFINQA1223	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\navailable , we do not expect any transactions to have a significant impact on our reported income tax expense . in connection with the completion of the reorganization , we will reevaluate the ability to realize our deferred tax assets related to u.s . operations under the new aon uk corporate structure and we may recognize a non-cash , deferred tax expense upon the conclusion of this evaluation . based on information currently available , we do not expect the additional deferred tax expense , if any , to be significant . the reorganization will result in additional ongoing costs to us . the completion of the reorganization will result in an increase in some of our ongoing expenses and require us to incur some new expenses . some costs , including those related to employees in our u.k . offices and holding board meetings in the u.k. , are expected to be higher than would be the case if our principal executive offices were not relocated to the u.k. . we also expect to incur new expenses , including professional fees and sdrt in connection with settlement of equity-based awards under our stock or share incentive plans , to comply with u.k . corporate and tax laws . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . we have offices in various locations throughout the world . substantially all of our offices are located in leased premises . we maintain our corporate headquarters at 200 e . randolph street in chicago , illinois , where we occupy approximately 355000 square feet of space under an operating lease agreement that expires in 2013 . there are two five-year renewal options at current market rates . we own one building at pallbergweg 2-4 , amsterdam , the netherlands ( 150000 square feet ) . the following are additional significant leased properties , along with the occupied square footage and expiration. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>property:</td><td>occupied square footage</td><td>lease expiration dates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>4 overlook point and other locations lincolnshire illinois</td><td>1224000</td><td>2014 2013 2019</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2601 research forest drive the woodlands texas</td><td>414000</td><td>2020</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dlf city and unitech cyber park gurgaan india</td><td>383000</td><td>2012 2013 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2300 discovery drive orlando florida</td><td>364000</td><td>2020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>devonshire square and other locations london uk</td><td>327000</td><td>2018 2013 2023</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>199 water street new york new york</td><td>319000</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>7201 hewitt associates drive charlotte north carolina</td><td>218000</td><td>2015</td></tr></table> 7201 hewitt associates drive , charlotte , north carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218000 2015 the locations in lincolnshire , illinois , the woodlands , texas , orlando , florida , and charlotte north carolina , each of which were acquired as part of the hewitt acquisition in 2010 , are primarily dedicated to our hr solutions segment . the other locations listed above house personnel from each of our business segments . in november 2011 , aon entered into an agreement to lease 190000 square feet in a new building to be constructed in london , united kingdom . the agreement is contingent upon the completion of the building construction . aon expects to move into the new building in 2015 when it exercises an early break option at the devonshire square location. .\nQuestion: what was the occupied square footage for 2601 research forest drive the woodlands texas?\nAnswer: 414000.0\nQuestion: and for 2300 discovery drive orlando florida?\nAnswer: 364000.0\nQuestion: combined, what was the occupied square footage for these two properties?\nAnswer: 778000.0\nQuestion: and the average square footage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "389000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA395	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1509.7</td><td>$ 1667.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 150.1</td><td>$ 107.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1610.3</td><td>1612.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1762.3</td><td>$ 1722.2</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. .\nQuestion: what was the long-term debt in 2015?\nAnswer: 1610.3\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\nAnswer: 1612.9\nQuestion: what was, then, the total long-term debt for those two years combined?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3223.2" } ]
CONVFINQA1557	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nof sales , competitive supply gross margin declined in south america , europe/africa and the caribbean and remained relatively flat in north america and asia . large utilities gross margin increased $ 201 million , or 37% ( 37 % ) , to $ 739 million in 2001 from $ 538 million in 2000 . excluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations during 2001 and 2000 , large utilities gross margin increased 10% ( 10 % ) to $ 396 million in 2001 . large utilities gross margin as a percentage of revenues increased to 30% ( 30 % ) in 2001 from 25% ( 25 % ) in 2000 . in the caribbean ( which includes venezuela ) , large utility gross margin increased $ 166 million and was due to a full year of contribution from edc which was acquired in june 2000 . also , in north america , the gross margin contributions from both ipalco and cilcorp increased . growth distribution gross margin increased $ 165 million , or 126% ( 126 % ) to $ 296 million in 2001 from $ 131 million in 2000 . excluding businesses acquired during 2001 and 2000 , growth distribution gross margin increased 93% ( 93 % ) to $ 268 million in 2001 . growth distribution gross margin as a percentage of revenue increased to 18% ( 18 % ) in 2001 from 10% ( 10 % ) in 2000 . growth distribution business gross margin , as well as gross margin as a percentage of sales , increased in south america and the caribbean , but decreased in europe/africa and asia . in south america , growth distribution margin increased $ 157 million and was 38% ( 38 % ) of revenues . the increase is due primarily to sul 2019s sales of excess energy into the southeast market where rationing was taking place . in the caribbean , growth distribution margin increased $ 39 million and was 5% ( 5 % ) of revenues . the increase is due mainly to lower losses at ede este and an increase in contribution from caess . in europe/africa , growth distribution margin decreased $ 10 million and was negative due to losses at sonel . in asia , growth distribution margin decreased $ 18 million and was negative due primarily to an increase in losses at telasi . the breakdown of aes 2019s gross margin for the years ended december 31 , 2001 and 2000 , based on the geographic region in which they were earned , is set forth below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>north america</td><td>2001 $ 912 million</td><td>% ( % ) of revenue 25% ( 25 % )</td><td>2000 $ 844 million</td><td>% ( % ) of revenue 25% ( 25 % )</td><td>% ( % ) change 8% ( 8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>south america</td><td>$ 522 million</td><td>30% ( 30 % )</td><td>$ 416 million</td><td>36% ( 36 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>caribbean</td><td>$ 457 million</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>$ 226 million</td><td>21% ( 21 % )</td><td>102% ( 102 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>europe/africa</td><td>$ 310 million</td><td>22% ( 22 % )</td><td>$ 371 million</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>( 16% ( 16 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asia</td><td>$ 101 million</td><td>15% ( 15 % )</td><td>$ 138 million</td><td>22% ( 22 % )</td><td>( 27% ( 27 % ) )</td></tr></table> includes venezuela and colombia . selling , general and administrative expenses selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 38 million , or 46% ( 46 % ) , to $ 120 million in 2001 from $ 82 million in 2000 . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues remained constant at 1% ( 1 % ) in 2001 and 2000 . the overall increase in selling , general and administrative expenses is due to increased development activities . interest expense , net net interest expense increased $ 327 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , to $ 1.5 billion in 2001 from $ 1.1 billion in 2000 . net interest expense as a percentage of revenues increased to 16% ( 16 % ) in 2001 from 15% ( 15 % ) in 2000 . net interest expense increased overall primarily due to interest expense at new businesses , additional corporate interest expense arising from senior debt issued during 2001 to finance new investments and mark-to-market losses on interest rate related derivative instruments. .\nQuestion: what is the gross profit for north america in 2001?\nAnswer: 912.0\nQuestion: what is is the gross margin?\nAnswer: 0.25\nQuestion: what total revenue does this represent for north america?\nAnswer: 3648.0\nQuestion: what about the total revenue for south america?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1740.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9703	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin addition , included in the loan table are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2009 was $ 825 million net of an allowance of $ 95 million . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2009 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>accretable yield</td><td>carrying amount of loan receivable</td><td>allowance</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 92</td><td>$ 1510</td><td>$ 122</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases ( 1 )</td><td>14</td><td>329</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disposals/payments received</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-967 ( 967 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>52</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>builds ( reductions ) to the allowance</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>1</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>increase to expected cash flows</td><td>10</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fx/other</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance december 31 2009 ( 2 )</td><td>$ 27</td><td>$ 920</td><td>$ 95</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 87 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 242 million under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 101 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 561 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 359 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .\nQuestion: what is the balance december 31 2009 (2) in the carrying amount of loan receivable?\nAnswer: 920.0\nQuestion: what is the purchased loans accounted for under the under the cost-recovery method?\nAnswer: 242.0\nQuestion: what is the difference between the balance december 31 2009 (2) in the carrying amount of loan receivable, and the purchased loans accounted for under the under the cost-recovery method?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "678.0" } ]
CONVFINQA796	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nn o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 : number of restricted stock weighted average grant- date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of restricted stock</td><td>weighted average grant- date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2005</td><td>3488668</td><td>$ 41.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1632504</td><td>$ 56.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1181249 ( 1181249 )</td><td>$ 40.20</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-360734 ( 360734 )</td><td>$ 44.04</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2006</td><td>3579189</td><td>$ 48.07</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1818716</td><td>$ 56.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1345412 ( 1345412 )</td><td>$ 44.48</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-230786 ( 230786 )</td><td>$ 51.57</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2007</td><td>3821707</td><td>$ 53.12</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>1836532</td><td>$ 59.84</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1403826 ( 1403826 )</td><td>$ 50.96</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-371183 ( 371183 )</td><td>$ 53.75</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2008</td><td>3883230</td><td>$ 57.01</td></tr></table> under the provisions of fas 123r , the recognition of deferred compensation , a contra-equity account representing the amount of unrecognized restricted stock expense that is reduced as expense is recognized , at the date restricted stock is granted is no longer permitted . therefore , upon adoption of fas 123r , the amount of deferred compensation that had been reflected in unearned stock grant compensation was reclassified to additional paid-in capital in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . restricted stock units the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of other awards , including restricted stock units . the company generally grants restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . each restricted stock unit repre- sents the company 2019s obligation to deliver to the holder one share of common shares upon vesting . during 2008 , the company awarded 223588 restricted stock units to officers of the company and its subsidiaries with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 59.93 . during 2007 , 108870 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.29 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . during 2006 , 83370 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.36 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . the company also grants restricted stock units with a 1-year vesting period to non-management directors . delivery of common shares on account of these restricted stock units to non-management directors is deferred until six months after the date of the non-management directors 2019 termination from the board . during 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , 40362 restricted stock units , 29676 restricted stock units , and 23092 restricted stock units , respectively , were awarded to non-management direc- the espp gives participating employees the right to purchase common shares through payroll deductions during consecutive 201csubscription periods . 201d annual purchases by participants are limited to the number of whole shares that can be purchased by an amount equal to ten percent of the participant 2019s compensation or $ 25000 , whichever is less . the espp has two six-month subscription periods , the first of which runs between january 1 and june 30 and the second of which runs between july 1 and december 31 of each year . the amounts that have been collected from participants during a subscription period are used on the 201cexercise date 201d to purchase full shares of common shares . an exercise date is generally the last trading day of a sub- scription period . the number of shares purchased is equal to the total amount , as of the exercise date , that has been collected from the participants through payroll deductions for that subscription period , divided by the 201cpurchase price 201d , rounded down to the next full share . effective for and from the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price is 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the exercise date . prior to the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price was calculated as the lower of ( i ) 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the first day of the subscription period , or .\nQuestion: what is the number of granted restricted stock in 2007?\nAnswer: 1818716.0\nQuestion: what is the number of vested and issued restricted stock in 2007?\nAnswer: -1345412.0\nQuestion: what is the total number of granted, vested and issued restricted stock in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "473304.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8524	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncapital resources and liquidity capital resources overview capital has historically been generated by earnings from citi 2019s operating businesses . citi may also augment its capital through issuances of common stock , convertible preferred stock , preferred stock , equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans , and , in the case of regulatory capital , through the issuance of subordinated debt underlying trust preferred securities . in addition , the impact of future events on citi 2019s business results , such as corporate and asset dispositions , as well as changes in accounting standards , also affect citi 2019s capital levels . generally , capital is used primarily to support assets in citi 2019s businesses and to absorb market , credit , or operational losses . while capital may be used for other purposes , such as to pay dividends or repurchase common stock , citi 2019s ability to utilize its capital for these purposes is currently restricted due to its agreements with the u.s . government , generally for so long as the u.s . government continues to hold citi 2019s common stock or trust preferred securities . see also 201csupervision and regulation 201d below . citigroup 2019s capital management framework is designed to ensure that citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with citi 2019s risk profile and all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines , as well as external rating agency considerations . the capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated , legal entity , and country level . senior management is responsible for the capital management process mainly through citigroup 2019s finance and asset and liability committee ( finalco ) , with oversight from the risk management and finance committee of citigroup 2019s board of directors . the finalco is composed of the senior-most management of citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity matters . among other things , finalco 2019s responsibilities include : determining the financial structure of citigroup and its principal subsidiaries ; ensuring that citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized in consultation with its regulators ; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for citigroup and individual businesses ; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for citigroup ; and monitoring interest rate risk , corporate and bank liquidity , and the impact of currency translation on non-u.s . earnings and capital . capital ratios citigroup is subject to the risk-based capital guidelines issued by the federal reserve board . historically , capital adequacy has been measured , in part , based on two risk-based capital ratios , the tier 1 capital and total capital ( tier 1 capital + tier 2 capital ) ratios . tier 1 capital consists of the sum of 201ccore capital elements , 201d such as qualifying common stockholders 2019 equity , as adjusted , qualifying noncontrolling interests , and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts , principally reduced by goodwill , other disallowed intangible assets , and disallowed deferred tax assets . total capital also includes 201csupplementary 201d tier 2 capital elements , such as qualifying subordinated debt and a limited portion of the allowance for credit losses . both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets . further , in conjunction with the conduct of the 2009 supervisory capital assessment program ( scap ) , u.s . banking regulators developed a new measure of capital termed 201ctier 1 common , 201d which has been defined as tier 1 capital less non-common elements , including qualifying perpetual preferred stock , qualifying noncontrolling interests , and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts . citigroup 2019s risk-weighted assets are principally derived from application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the measurement of credit risk . pursuant to these guidelines , on-balance-sheet assets and the credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance-sheet exposures ( such as financial guarantees , unfunded lending commitments , letters of credit , and derivatives ) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk-weight categories based upon the perceived credit risk associated with the obligor , or if relevant , the guarantor , the nature of the collateral , or external credit ratings . risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account . excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets , such as goodwill and deferred tax assets , to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital . see 201ccomponents of capital under regulatory guidelines 201d below . citigroup is also subject to a leverage ratio requirement , a non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy , which is defined as tier 1 capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average total assets . to be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , a bank holding company must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) , and a leverage ratio of at least 3% ( 3 % ) , and not be subject to a federal reserve board directive to maintain higher capital levels . the following table sets forth citigroup 2019s regulatory capital ratios as of december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 . citigroup regulatory capital ratios . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>at year end</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 common</td><td>9.60% ( 9.60 % )</td><td>2.30% ( 2.30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>11.67</td><td>11.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total capital ( tier 1 capital and tier 2 capital )</td><td>15.25</td><td>15.70</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>leverage</td><td>6.89</td><td>6.08</td></tr></table> as noted in the table above , citigroup was 201cwell capitalized 201d under the federal bank regulatory agency definitions at year end for both 2009 and 2008. .\nQuestion: by how much did the tier 1 common ratio change between 2008 and 2009?\nAnswer: 7.3\nQuestion: and the change in tier 1 capital ratio between 2008 and 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.25" } ]
CONVFINQA6503	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nn o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( c o n t i n u e d ) the realization of this investment gain ( $ 5624 net of the award ) . this award , which will be paid out over a three-year period , is presented as deferred compensation award on the balance sheet . as of december 31 , 2002 , $ 1504 had been paid against this compensation award . 401 ( k ) plan during august 1997 , the company implemented a 401 ( k ) savings/retirement plan ( the 201c401 ( k ) plan 201d ) to cover eligible employees of the company and any designated affiliate . the 401 ( k ) plan permits eligible employees of the company to defer up to 15% ( 15 % ) of their annual compensation , subject to cer- tain limitations imposed by the code . the employees 2019 elec- tive deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contribution to the 401 ( k ) plan . during 2000 , the company amended its 401 ( k ) plan to include a matching contribution , subject to erisa limitations , equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 4% ( 4 % ) of annual compensation deferred by an employee . for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the company made matching contributions of $ 140 , $ 116 and $ 54 , respectively . 18 . commitments and contingencies the company and the operating partnership are not presently involved in any material litigation nor , to their knowledge , is any material litigation threatened against them or their properties , other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business . management believes the costs , if any , incurred by the company and the operating partnership related to this litigation will not materially affect the financial position , operating results or liquidity of the company and the operating partnership . on october 24 , 2001 , an accident occurred at 215 park avenue south , a property which the company manages , but does not own . personal injury claims have been filed against the company and others by 11 persons . the company believes that there is sufficient insurance coverage to cover the cost of such claims , as well as any other personal injury or property claims which may arise . the company has entered into employment agreements with certain executives . six executives have employment agreements which expire between november 2003 and december 2007 . the cash based compensation associated with these employment agreements totals approximately $ 2125 for 2003 . during march 1998 , the company acquired an operating sub-leasehold position at 420 lexington avenue . the oper- ating sub-leasehold position requires annual ground lease payments totaling $ 6000 and sub-leasehold position pay- ments totaling $ 1100 ( excluding an operating sub-lease position purchased january 1999 ) . the ground lease and sub-leasehold positions expire 2008 . the company may extend the positions through 2029 at market rents . the property located at 1140 avenue of the americas operates under a net ground lease ( $ 348 annually ) with a term expiration date of 2016 and with an option to renew for an additional 50 years . the property located at 711 third avenue operates under an operating sub-lease which expires in 2083 . under the sub- lease , the company is responsible for ground rent payments of $ 1600 annually which increased to $ 3100 in july 2001 and will continue for the next ten years . the ground rent is reset after year ten based on the estimated fair market value of the property . in april 1988 , the sl green predecessor entered into a lease agreement for property at 673 first avenue in new york city , which has been capitalized for financial statement purposes . land was estimated to be approximately 70% ( 70 % ) of the fair market value of the property . the portion of the lease attributed to land is classified as an operating lease and the remainder as a capital lease . the initial lease term is 49 years with an option for an additional 26 years . beginning in lease years 11 and 25 , the lessor is entitled to additional rent as defined by the lease agreement . the company continues to lease the 673 first avenue prop- erty which has been classified as a capital lease with a cost basis of $ 12208 and cumulative amortization of $ 3579 and $ 3306 at december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively . the fol- lowing is a schedule of future minimum lease payments under capital leases and noncancellable operating leases with initial terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2002 . non-cancellable operating december 31 , capital leases leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>capital leases</td><td>non-cancellable operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003</td><td>$ 1290</td><td>$ 11982</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2004</td><td>1290</td><td>11982</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2005</td><td>1290</td><td>11982</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2006</td><td>1322</td><td>11982</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>1416</td><td>11982</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>56406</td><td>296277</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>63014</td><td>356187</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less amount representing interest</td><td>47152</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 15862</td><td>$ 356187</td></tr></table> 19 . financial instruments : derivatives and hedging financial accounting standards board 2019s statement no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 201d ( 201csfas 133 201d ) which became effective january 1 , 2001 requires the company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , f i f t y - t w o s l g r e e n r e a l t y c o r p . .\nQuestion: what is the minimum payment for capital leases due in 2003?\nAnswer: 1290.0\nQuestion: what about the total minimum lease payments?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "63014.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2056	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents ( e ) other adjustments primarily include certain historical retention costs , unusual , non-recurring litigation matters , secondary-offering-related expenses and expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago . during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , we recorded ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses of $ 75.0 million . for additional information on the ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses , see note 10 ( stockholder 2019s equity ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . ( f ) includes the impact of consolidating five months for the year ended december 31 , 2015 of kelway 2019s financial results . ( 4 ) non-gaap net income excludes , among other things , charges related to the amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets , non-cash equity-based compensation , acquisition and integration expenses , and gains and losses from the extinguishment of long-term debt . non-gaap net income is considered a non-gaap financial measure . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that non-gaap net income provides meaningful information regarding our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . the following unaudited table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to non-gaap net income for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization of intangibles ( a )</td><td>173.9</td><td>161.2</td><td>161.2</td><td>163.7</td><td>165.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation related to equity investment ( b )</td><td>20.0</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net loss on extinguishments of long-term debt</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>3.7</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>61.2</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f )</td><td>-64.8 ( 64.8 )</td><td>-103.0 ( 103.0 )</td><td>-113.5 ( 113.5 )</td><td>-71.6 ( 71.6 )</td><td>-106.8 ( 106.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-gaap net income ( g )</td><td>$ 503.5</td><td>$ 409.9</td><td>$ 314.3</td><td>$ 247.1</td><td>$ 198.8</td></tr></table> acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 3.7 ( 0.3 ) 61.2 ( 3.3 ) ( 15.6 ) aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f ) ( 64.8 ) ( 103.0 ) ( 113.5 ) ( 71.6 ) ( 106.8 ) non-gaap net income ( g ) $ 503.5 $ 409.9 $ 314.3 $ 247.1 $ 198.8 ( a ) includes amortization expense for acquisition-related intangible assets , primarily customer relationships , customer contracts and trade names . ( b ) represents our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to our acquisition of kelway . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway . ( e ) primarily includes expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago and secondary- offering-related expenses . amount in 2013 primarily relates to ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses . ( f ) based on a normalized effective tax rate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) ( 39.0% ( 39.0 % ) prior to the kelway acquisition ) , except for the non- cash equity-based compensation from our equity investment and the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway , which were tax effected at a rate of 35.4% ( 35.4 % ) . the aggregate adjustment for income taxes also includes a $ 4.0 million deferred tax benefit recorded during the three months and year ended december 31 , 2015 as a result of a tax rate reduction in the united kingdom and additional tax expense during the year ended december 31 , 2015 of $ 3.3 million as a result of recording withholding tax on the unremitted earnings of our canadian subsidiary . additionally , note that certain acquisition costs are non-deductible. .\nQuestion: what was net income in 2015?\nAnswer: 403.1\nQuestion: what was the value of stock compensation?\nAnswer: 31.2\nQuestion: what is the sum total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "434.3" } ]
CONVFINQA1596	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report 53 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets businesses in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding net interest income arising from cib 2019s markets businesses to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . this net interest income is referred to as non-markets related net interest income . cib 2019s markets businesses are fixed income markets and equity markets . management believes that disclosure of non-markets related net interest income provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non-markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of markets related net interest income arising from cib . year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2017 2016 2015 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 51410 $ 47292 $ 44620 less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) 4630 6334 5298 net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) $ 46780 $ 40958 $ 39322 average interest-earning assets $ 2180592 $ 2101604 $ 2088242 less : average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 540835 520307 510292 average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets $ 1639757 $ 1581297 $ 1577950 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.36% ( 2.36 % ) 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) net interest yield on average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 0.86 1.22 1.04 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets 2.85% ( 2.85 % ) 2.59% ( 2.59 % ) 2.49% ( 2.49 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedges . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 52 . ( c ) the amounts in this table differ from the prior-period presentation to align with cib 2019s markets businesses . for further information on cib 2019s markets businesses , see page 65 . calculation of certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures are calculated as follows : book value per share ( 201cbvps 201d ) common stockholders 2019 equity at period-end / common shares at period-end overhead ratio total noninterest expense / total net revenue return on assets ( 201croa 201d ) reported net income / total average assets return on common equity ( 201croe 201d ) net income* / average common stockholders 2019 equity return on tangible common equity ( 201crotce 201d ) net income* / average tangible common equity tangible book value per share ( 201ctbvps 201d ) tangible common equity at period-end / common shares at period-end * represents net income applicable to common equity . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b )</td><td>$ 51410</td><td>$ 47292</td><td>$ 44620</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : cib markets net interest income ( c )</td><td>4630</td><td>6334</td><td>5298</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net interest income excluding cib markets ( a )</td><td>$ 46780</td><td>$ 40958</td><td>$ 39322</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average interest-earning assets</td><td>$ 2180592</td><td>$ 2101604</td><td>$ 2088242</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less : average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c )</td><td>540835</td><td>520307</td><td>510292</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets</td><td>$ 1639757</td><td>$ 1581297</td><td>$ 1577950</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis</td><td>2.36% ( 2.36 % )</td><td>2.25% ( 2.25 % )</td><td>2.14% ( 2.14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net interest yield on average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c )</td><td>0.86</td><td>1.22</td><td>1.04</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets</td><td>2.85% ( 2.85 % )</td><td>2.59% ( 2.59 % )</td><td>2.49% ( 2.49 % )</td></tr></table> jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report 53 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets businesses in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding net interest income arising from cib 2019s markets businesses to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . this net interest income is referred to as non-markets related net interest income . cib 2019s markets businesses are fixed income markets and equity markets . management believes that disclosure of non-markets related net interest income provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non-markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of markets related net interest income arising from cib . year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2017 2016 2015 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 51410 $ 47292 $ 44620 less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) 4630 6334 5298 net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) $ 46780 $ 40958 $ 39322 average interest-earning assets $ 2180592 $ 2101604 $ 2088242 less : average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 540835 520307 510292 average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets $ 1639757 $ 1581297 $ 1577950 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.36% ( 2.36 % ) 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) net interest yield on average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 0.86 1.22 1.04 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets 2.85% ( 2.85 % ) 2.59% ( 2.59 % ) 2.49% ( 2.49 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedges . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 52 . ( c ) the amounts in this table differ from the prior-period presentation to align with cib 2019s markets businesses . for further information on cib 2019s markets businesses , see page 65 . calculation of certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures are calculated as follows : book value per share ( 201cbvps 201d ) common stockholders 2019 equity at period-end / common shares at period-end overhead ratio total noninterest expense / total net revenue return on assets ( 201croa 201d ) reported net income / total average assets return on common equity ( 201croe 201d ) net income* / average common stockholders 2019 equity return on tangible common equity ( 201crotce 201d ) net income* / average tangible common equity tangible book value per share ( 201ctbvps 201d ) tangible common equity at period-end / common shares at period-end * represents net income applicable to common equity .\nQuestion: what fraction of the total net interest income 2013 managed basis is related to the cib markets net interest income in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.13393" } ]
CONVFINQA1761	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsubstantially all of the goodwill and other intangible assets recorded related to the acquisition of allied are not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma information the consolidated financial statements presented for republic include the operating results of allied from the date of the acquisition . the following pro forma information is presented assuming the merger had been completed as of january 1 , 2007 . the unaudited pro forma information presented below has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations ( in millions , except share and per share amounts ) . year ended december 31 , year ended december 31 , ( unaudited ) ( unaudited ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited )</td><td>year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 9362.2</td><td>$ 9244.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income from continuing operations available to common stockholders</td><td>285.7</td><td>423.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per share</td><td>.76</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>.75</td><td>1.09</td></tr></table> the above unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets , accretion of discounts to fair value associated with debt , environmental , self-insurance and other liabilities , accretion of capping , closure and post-closure obligations and amortization of the related assets , and provision for income taxes . assets held for sale as a condition of the merger with allied in december 2008 , we reached a settlement with the doj requiring us to divest of certain operations serving fifteen metropolitan areas including los angeles , ca ; san francisco , ca ; denver , co ; atlanta , ga ; northwestern indiana ; lexington , ky ; flint , mi ; cape girardeau , mo ; charlotte , nc ; cleveland , oh ; philadelphia , pa ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; and fort worth , houston and lubbock , tx . the settlement requires us to divest 87 commercial waste collection routes , nine landfills and ten transfer stations , together with ancillary assets and , in three cases , access to landfill disposal capacity . we have classified the assets and liabilities we expect to divest ( including accounts receivable , property and equipment , goodwill , and accrued landfill and environmental costs ) as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were republic 2019s prior to the merger with allied have been adjusted to the lower of their carrying amounts or estimated fair values less costs to sell , which resulted in us recognizing an asset impairment loss of $ 6.1 million in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were allied 2019s prior to the merger are recorded at their estimated fair values in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2008 in accordance with the purchase method of accounting . in february 2009 , we entered into an agreement to divest certain assets to waste connections , inc . the assets covered by the agreement include six municipal solid waste landfills , six collection operations and three transfer stations across the following seven markets : los angeles , ca ; denver , co ; houston , tx ; lubbock , tx ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; charlotte , nc ; and flint , mi . the transaction with waste connections is subject to closing conditions regarding due diligence , regulatory approval and other customary matters . closing is expected to occur in the second quarter of 2009 . republic services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements %%transmsg* transmitting job : p14076 pcn : 106000000 *%%pcmsg\|104 \|00046\|yes\|no\|02/28/2009 21:07\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: in the year of 2008, what was the income from continuing operations available to common stockholders?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "285.7" } ]
CONVFINQA6713	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 7 . financing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american tower credit facility</td><td>$ 1000000</td><td>$ 793000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>spectrasite credit facility</td><td>725000</td><td>700000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior subordinated notes</td><td>325075</td><td>400000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation</td><td>-</td><td>160252</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior notes net of discount and premium</td><td>728507</td><td>726754</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>convertible notes net of discount</td><td>704596</td><td>773058</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and capital leases</td><td>59838</td><td>60365</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>3543016</td><td>3613429</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less current portion of other long-term obligations</td><td>-253907 ( 253907 )</td><td>-162153 ( 162153 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>long-term obligations</td><td>$ 3289109</td><td>$ 3451276</td></tr></table> credit facilities 2014in october 2005 , the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries . the company replaced the existing american tower $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $ 900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.15 billion senior secured credit facility . in february 2007 , the company secured an additional $ 550.0 million under its credit facilities and drew down $ 250.0 million of the existing revolving loans under the american tower credit facility . ( see note 19. ) during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company drew down the remaining amount available under the delayed draw term loan component of the american tower credit facility and drew down $ 25.0 million of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite credit facility to finance debt redemptions and repurchases . in addition , on october 27 , 2006 , the remaining $ 175.0 million undrawn portion of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite facility was canceled pursuant to its terms . as of december 31 , 2006 , the american tower credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 300.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 17.8 million of undrawn letters of credit are outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; 2022 a $ 750.0 million term loan a , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; and 2022 a $ 250.0 million delayed draw term loan , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 . the borrowers under the american tower credit facility include ati , american tower , l.p. , american tower international , inc . and american tower llc . the company and the borrowers 2019 restricted subsidiaries ( as defined in the loan agreement ) have guaranteed all of the loans under the credit facility . these loans are secured by liens on and security interests in substantially all assets of the borrowers and the restricted subsidiaries , with a carrying value aggregating approximately $ 4.5 billion at december 31 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the spectrasite credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 250.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 4.6 million of undrawn letters of credit were outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010; .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2005, what was the amount from the total of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements that was current?\nAnswer: 162153.0\nQuestion: and what was that total of outstanding amounts?\nAnswer: 3613429.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, did that current amount represent?\nAnswer: 0.04488\nQuestion: and what was this percentage representation in the next year, in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.07166" } ]
CONVFINQA2120	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi peer group ( 1 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 108.50</td><td>$ 122.80</td><td>$ 132.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 106.20</td><td>$ 132.50</td><td>$ 150.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 120.40</td><td>$ 143.50</td><td>$ 152.60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>$ 130.80</td><td>$ 145.60</td><td>$ 170.80</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>$ 156.80</td><td>$ 172.70</td><td>$ 208.10</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .\nQuestion: what is the value of an investment in pmi as of decemeber 31, 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "156.8" } ]
CONVFINQA2316	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in fair value</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>75</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to earnings</td><td>2</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ -7 ( 7 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 16</td></tr></table> net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund , available-for-sale investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values . using quoted market prices and market interest rates , the company determined that the fair value of long- term debt at december 31 , 2008 was $ 2.8 billion , compared to a carrying value of $ 4.1 billion . since considerable judgment is required in interpreting market information , the fair value of the long-term debt is not necessarily indicative of the amount which could be realized in a current market exchange . equity price market risk at december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s available-for-sale equity securities portfolio had an approximate fair market value of $ 128 million , which represented a cost basis of $ 125 million and a net unrealized loss of $ 3 million . these equity securities are held for purposes other than trading . %%transmsg* transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 105000000 *%%pcmsg\|102 \|00022\|yes\|no\|02/23/2009 19:17\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n\| .\nQuestion: what was the balance of stockholder equity in the end of 2006?\nAnswer: 16.0\nQuestion: and what was it in the beginning of that year?\nAnswer: 2.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in that balance throughout 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "14.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7069	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfoodservice sales volumes increased in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales margins were higher reflecting the realization of sales price increases for the pass-through of earlier cost increases . raw material costs for board and resins were lower . operating costs and distribution costs were both higher . the u.s . shorewood business was sold december 31 , 2011 and the non-u.s . business was sold in january looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to increase slightly from the fourth quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly lower , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be higher for energy and wood . no planned main- tenance outages are scheduled in the first quarter . in january 2013 the company announced the perma- nent shutdown of a coated paperboard machine at the augusta mill with an annual capacity of 140000 tons . foodservice sales volumes are expected to increase . average sales margins are expected to decrease due to the realization of sales price decreases effective with our january contract open- ers . input costs for board and resin are expected to be lower and operating costs are also expected to decrease . european consumer packaging net sales in 2012 were $ 380 million compared with $ 375 million in 2011 and $ 345 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 99 million compared with $ 93 million in 2011 and $ 76 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 increased from 2011 . average sales price realizations were higher in russian markets , but were lower in european markets . input costs decreased , primarily for wood , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower in 2012 than in 2011 . looking forward to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to decrease in both europe and russia . average sales price realizations are expected to be higher in russia , but be more than offset by decreases in europe . input costs are expected to increase for wood and chemicals . no maintenance outages are scheduled for the first quarter . asian consumer packaging net sales were $ 830 million in 2012 compared with $ 855 million in 2011 and $ 705 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 4 million compared with $ 35 million in 2011 and $ 34 million in 2010 . sales volumes increased in 2012 compared with 2011 partially due to the start-up of a new coated paperboard machine . average sales price realizations were significantly lower , but were partially offset by lower input costs for purchased pulp . start-up costs for a new coated paperboard machine adversely impacted operating profits in 2012 . in the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly . average sales price realizations for folding carton board and bristols board are expected to be lower reflecting increased competitive pressures and seasonally weaker market demand . input costs should be higher for pulp and chemicals . however , costs related to the ramp-up of the new coated paperboard machine should be lower . distribution xpedx , our distribution business , is one of north america 2019s leading business-to-business distributors to manufacturers , facility managers and printers , providing customized solutions that are designed to improve efficiency , reduce costs and deliver results . customer demand is generally sensitive to changes in economic conditions and consumer behavior , along with segment specific activity including corpo- rate advertising and promotional spending , government spending and domestic manufacturing activity . distribution 2019s margins are relatively stable across an economic cycle . providing customers with the best choice for value in both products and supply chain services is a key competitive factor . addition- ally , efficient customer service , cost-effective logis- tics and focused working capital management are key factors in this segment 2019s profitability . distribution . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6040</td><td>$ 6630</td><td>$ 6735</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>22</td><td>34</td><td>78</td></tr></table> distr ibut ion 2019s 2012 annual sales decreased 9% ( 9 % ) from 2011 , and decreased 10% ( 10 % ) from 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 22 million ( $ 71 million exclud- ing reorganization costs ) compared with $ 34 million ( $ 86 million excluding reorganization costs ) in 2011 and $ 78 million in 2010 . annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment totaled $ 3.5 billion in 2012 compared with $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , reflecting declining demand and the exiting of unprofitable businesses . trade margins as a percent of sales for printing papers were relatively even with both 2011 and 2010 . revenue from packaging prod- ucts was flat at $ 1.6 billion in both 2012 and 2011 and up slightly compared to $ 1.5 billion in 2010 . pack- aging margins increased in 2012 from both 2011 and 2010 , reflecting the successful execution of strategic sourcing initiatives . facility supplies annual revenue was $ 0.9 billion in 2012 , down compared to $ 1.0 bil- lion in 2011 and 2010 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 49 million of reorganization costs for severance , professional services and asset write-downs compared with $ 52 .\nQuestion: what are the total annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment in 2012, in millions?\nAnswer: 3500.0\nQuestion: what is the sales generated via distribution channel in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6040.0" } ]
CONVFINQA721	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 20 of 100 segment sales were $ 100.7 million lower in 2009 than in 2008 , primarily as a result of the impact of lower aluminum prices partially offset by an increase in sales volumes . the higher sales volumes in 2009 were the result of incremental volumes from the four plants purchased from ab inbev , partially offset by certain plant closures and lower sales volumes in the existing business . segment earnings in 2010 were $ 122.3 million higher than in 2009 primarily due to a net $ 85 million impact related to the higher sales volumes and $ 45 million of product mix and improved manufacturing performance associated with higher production . also adding to the 2010 improvement was the effect of a $ 7 million out-of-period inventory charge in 2009 . the details of the out-of-period adjustment are included in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included within item 8 of this report . segment earnings in 2009 were higher than in 2008 due to $ 12 million of earnings contribution from the four acquired plants and approximately $ 21 million of savings associated with plant closures . partially offsetting these favorable impacts were lower carbonated soft drink and beer can sales volumes ( excluding the newly acquired plants ) and approximately $ 25 million related to higher cost inventories in the first half of 2009 . metal beverage packaging , europe . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1697.6</td><td>$ 1739.5</td><td>$ 1868.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment earnings</td><td>$ 212.9</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation costs ( a )</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total segment earnings</td><td>$ 209.7</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) further details of these items are included in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . the metal beverage packaging , europe , segment includes metal beverage packaging products manufactured in europe . ball packaging europe has manufacturing plants located in germany , the united kingdom , france , the netherlands , poland and serbia , and is the second largest metal beverage container business in europe . segment sales in 2010 decreased $ 41.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange effects of $ 93 million and price and mix changes , partially offset by higher sales volumes . segment sales in 2009 as compared to 2008 were $ 129.2 million lower due to $ 110 million of unfavorable foreign exchange effects , partially offset by better commercial terms . sales volumes in 2009 were essentially flat compared to those in the prior year . segment earnings in 2010 decreased $ 1.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily the result of a $ 28 million increase related to higher sales volumes , offset by $ 18 million of negative effects from foreign currency translation and $ 12 million of higher inventory and other costs . while 2009 sales volumes were consistent with the prior year , the adverse effects of foreign currency translation , both within europe and on the conversion of the euro to the u.s . dollar , reduced segment earnings by $ 8 million . also contributing to lower segment earnings were higher cost inventory carried into 2009 and a change in sales mix , partially offset by better commercial terms in some of our contracts . on january 18 , 2011 , ball acquired aerocan s.a.s . ( aerocan ) , a leading european supplier of aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , for 20ac222.4 million ( approximately $ 300 million ) in cash and assumed debt . aerocan manufactures extruded aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , and the aluminum slugs used to make them , for customers in the personal care , pharmaceutical , beverage and food industries . it operates three aerosol can manufacturing plants 2013 one each in the czech republic , france and the united kingdom 2013 and is a 51 percent owner of a joint venture aluminum slug plant in france . the four plants employ approximately 560 people . the acquisition of aerocan will allow ball to enter a growing part of the metal packaging industry and to broaden the company 2019s market development efforts into a new customer base. .\nQuestion: what was the difference of segment sales in 2009 to 2008?\nAnswer: 129.2\nQuestion: what was the decrease in segment sales in 2010?\nAnswer: 41.9\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\nAnswer: 87.3\nQuestion: what is the net change divided by the 2009 difference?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.6757" } ]
CONVFINQA6907	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe , in the normal course of business operations , have issued product warranties related to equipment sales . also , contracts often contain standard terms and conditions which typically include a warranty and indemnification to the buyer that the goods and services purchased do not infringe on third-party intellectual property rights . the provision for estimated future costs relating to warranties is not material to the consolidated financial statements . we do not expect that any sum we may have to pay in connection with guarantees and warranties will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , liquidity , or results of operations . unconditional purchase obligations we are obligated to make future payments under unconditional purchase obligations as summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 942</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>307</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>298</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>276</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2983</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5331</td></tr></table> approximately $ 4000 of our unconditional purchase obligations relate to helium purchases , which include crude feedstock supply to multiple helium refining plants in north america as well as refined helium purchases from sources around the world . as a rare byproduct of natural gas production in the energy sector , these helium sourcing agreements are medium- to long-term and contain take-or-pay provisions . the refined helium is distributed globally and sold as a merchant gas , primarily under medium-term requirements contracts . while contract terms in the energy sector are longer than those in merchant , helium is a rare gas used in applications with few or no substitutions because of its unique physical and chemical properties . approximately $ 330 of our long-term unconditional purchase obligations relate to feedstock supply for numerous hyco ( hydrogen , carbon monoxide , and syngas ) facilities . the price of feedstock supply is principally related to the price of natural gas . however , long-term take-or-pay sales contracts to hyco customers are generally matched to the term of the feedstock supply obligations and provide recovery of price increases in the feedstock supply . due to the matching of most long-term feedstock supply obligations to customer sales contracts , we do not believe these purchase obligations would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations . the unconditional purchase obligations also include other product supply and purchase commitments and electric power and natural gas supply purchase obligations , which are primarily pass-through contracts with our customers . purchase commitments to spend approximately $ 350 for additional plant and equipment are included in the unconditional purchase obligations in 2017 . in addition , we have purchase commitments totaling approximately $ 500 in 2017 and 2018 relating to our long-term sale of equipment project for saudi aramco 2019s jazan oil refinery . 18 . capital stock common stock authorized common stock consists of 300 million shares with a par value of $ 1 per share . as of 30 september 2016 , 249 million shares were issued , with 217 million outstanding . on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1000 of our outstanding common stock . we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with several brokers . we did not purchase any of our outstanding shares during fiscal year 2016 . at 30 september 2016 , $ 485.3 in share repurchase authorization remains. .\nQuestion: what portion of total future payments is related to helium purchaes?\nAnswer: 0.75033\nQuestion: what portion of issued shares is outstanding as of september 30, 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.87149" } ]
CONVFINQA6110	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nno . 159 requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings at each reporting date . sfas no . 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 159 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , fair value measurements , which defines fair value , provides a framework for measuring fair value , and expands the disclosures required for fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements ; it does not require any new fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 157 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in june 2006 , the fasb issued fasb interpretation no . ( 2018 2018fin 2019 2019 ) 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes-an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 . fin 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by creating a framework for how companies should recognize , measure , present , and disclose in their financial statements uncertain tax positions that they have taken or expect to take in a tax return . fin 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2006 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of fin 48 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics for each of the last three fiscal years ( dollars in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and short-term investments</td><td>$ 15386</td><td>$ 10110</td><td>$ 8261</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1252</td><td>$ 895</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventory</td><td>$ 346</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 165</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 12657</td><td>$ 8066</td><td>$ 6813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 5470</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 2535</td></tr></table> as of september 29 , 2007 , the company had $ 15.4 billion in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments , an increase of $ 5.3 billion over the same balance at the end of september 30 , 2006 . the principal components of this net increase were cash generated by operating activities of $ 5.5 billion , proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock plans of $ 365 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $ 377 million . these increases were partially offset by payments for acquisitions of property , plant , and equipment of $ 735 million and payments for acquisitions of intangible assets of $ 251 million . the company 2019s short-term investment portfolio is primarily invested in highly rated , liquid investments . as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , $ 6.5 billion and $ 4.1 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital expenditures , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months. .\nQuestion: what was the inventory value as of 9/29/07?\nAnswer: 346.0\nQuestion: and for 9/30/06?\nAnswer: 270.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in value during these years?\nAnswer: 76.0\nQuestion: and the value for 2006 again?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "270.0" } ]
CONVFINQA377	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsumer foods net sales increased $ 303 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for the year to $ 6.8 billion . results reflect an increase of three percentage points from improved net pricing and product mix and two percentage points of improvement from higher volumes . net pricing and volume improvements were achieved in many of the company 2019s priority investment and enabler brands . the impact of product recalls partially offset these improvements . the company implemented significant price increases for many consumer foods products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 . continued net sales improvements are expected into fiscal 2009 when the company expects to receive the benefit of these pricing actions for full fiscal periods . sales of some of the company 2019s most significant brands , including chef boyardee ae , david ae , egg beaters ae , healthy choice ae , hebrew national ae , hunt 2019s ae , marie callender 2019s ae , manwich ae , orville redenbacher 2019s ae , pam ae , ro*tel ae , rosarita ae , snack pack ae , swiss miss ae , wesson ae , and wolf ae grew in fiscal 2008 . sales of act ii ae , andy capp ae , banquet ae , crunch 2018n munch ae , kid cuisine ae , parkay ae , pemmican ae , reddi-wip ae , and slim jim ae declined in fiscal 2008 . net sales in the consumer foods segment are not comparable across periods due to a variety of factors . the company initiated a peanut butter recall in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and reintroduced peter pan ae peanut butter products in august 2007 . sales of all peanut butter products , including both branded and private label , in fiscal 2008 were $ 14 million lower than comparable amounts in fiscal 2007 . consumer foods net sales were also adversely impacted by the recall of banquet ae and private label pot pies in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 . net sales of pot pies were lower by approximately $ 22 million in fiscal 2008 , relative to fiscal 2007 , primarily due to product returns and lost sales of banquet ae and private label pot pies . sales from alexia foods and lincoln snacks , businesses acquired in fiscal 2008 , totaled $ 66 million in fiscal 2008 . the company divested a refrigerated pizza business during the first half of fiscal 2007 . sales from this business were $ 17 million in fiscal food and ingredients net sales were $ 4.1 billion in fiscal 2008 , an increase of $ 706 million , or 21% ( 21 % ) . increased sales are reflective of higher sales prices in the company 2019s milling operations due to higher grain prices , and price and volume increases in the company 2019s potato and dehydrated vegetable operations . the fiscal 2007 divestiture of an oat milling operation resulted in a reduction of sales of $ 27 million for fiscal 2008 , partially offset by increased sales of $ 18 million from the acquisition of watts brothers in february 2008 . international foods net sales increased $ 65 million to $ 678 million . the strengthening of foreign currencies relative to the u.s . dollar accounted for approximately $ 36 million of this increase . the segment achieved a 5% ( 5 % ) increase in sales volume in fiscal 2008 , primarily reflecting increased unit sales in canada and mexico , and modest increases in net pricing . gross profit ( net sales less cost of goods sold ) ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2008 gross profit fiscal 2007 gross profit % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>reporting segment</td><td>fiscal 2008 gross profit</td><td>fiscal 2007 gross profit</td><td>% ( % ) increase/ ( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consumer foods</td><td>$ 1802</td><td>$ 1923</td><td>( 6 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>food and ingredients</td><td>724</td><td>590</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>international foods</td><td>190</td><td>180</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2716</td><td>$ 2693</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td></tr></table> the company 2019s gross profit for fiscal 2008 was $ 2.7 billion , an increase of $ 23 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , over the prior year . the increase in gross profit was largely driven by results in the food and ingredients segment , reflecting higher margins in the company 2019s milling and specialty potato operations , largely offset by reduced gross profits in the consumer foods segment . costs of implementing the company 2019s restructuring plans reduced gross profit by $ 4 million and $ 46 million in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what is the gross profit generated by consumer foods in 2007?\nAnswer: 1923.0\nQuestion: what about the total gross profit?\nAnswer: 2693.0\nQuestion: what proportion is coming from consumer foods?\nAnswer: 0.71407\nQuestion: what about the gross profit generated by consumer foods in 2008?\nAnswer: 1802.0\nQuestion: and total gross profit in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2716.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8753	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of pps , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha america inc . cellulose derivatives strategic ventures . our cellulose derivatives ventures generally fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay dividends based on each ventures' performance in the preceding year . in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we received cash dividends of $ 115 million , $ 92 million and $ 83 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( \"us gaap\" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2014 ( in percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2014 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr></table> research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . aoplus ae , aoplus ae2 , aoplus ae3 , ateva ae , avicor ae , britecoat ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx 2122 , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , duroset ae , ecovae ae , factor ae , fortron ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , impet ae , mowilith ae , nutrinova ae , qorus 2122 , riteflex ae , sunett ae , tcx 2122 , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vantageplus 2122 , vantage ae2 , vectra ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc. .\nQuestion: what was the value change in research and development expense from 2012 to 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-19.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8664	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties . authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration . however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time . during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority . as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 . this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 . as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement . during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively . of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority . we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time . we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions . there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases . under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us . the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term . the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount . during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 . during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 . during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 . for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share . as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements . as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements . subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million . this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets . upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 7632</td><td>$ 10640</td><td>$ -431 ( 431 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustments</td><td>5156</td><td>-4144 ( 4144 )</td><td>17343</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings</td><td>-2208 ( 2208 )</td><td>1136</td><td>-6272 ( 6272 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 10580</td><td>$ 7632</td><td>$ 10640</td></tr></table> the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties . authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration . however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time . during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority . as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 . this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 . as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement . during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively . of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority . we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time . we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions . there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases . under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us . the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term . the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount . during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 . during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 . during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 . for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share . as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements . as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements . subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million . this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets . upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .\nQuestion: what is the average price of repurchased shares in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "29.19" } ]
CONVFINQA917	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock options 2005 stock and incentive plan in june 2005 , the stockholders of the company approved the 2005 stock and incentive plan ( the 2005 stock plan ) . upon adoption of the 2005 stock plan , issuance of options under the company 2019s existing 2000 stock plan ceased . additionally , in connection with the acquisition of solexa , the company assumed stock options granted under the 2005 solexa equity incentive plan ( the 2005 solexa equity plan ) . as of december 30 , 2007 , an aggregate of up to 13485619 shares of the company 2019s common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2005 stock plan and the 2005 solexa equity plan . the 2005 stock plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the shares reserved for issuance by the lesser of 5% ( 5 % ) of outstanding shares of the company 2019s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year , 1200000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the company 2019s board of directors . as of december 30 , 2007 , options to purchase 1834384 shares remained available for future grant under the 2005 stock plan and 2005 solexa equity plan . the company 2019s stock option activity under all stock option plans from january 2 , 2005 through december 30 , 2007 is as follows : options weighted- average exercise price . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>options</td><td>weighted- average exercise price</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 2 2005</td><td>6205020</td><td>$ 6.99</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>2992300</td><td>$ 10.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>exercised</td><td>-869925 ( 869925 )</td><td>$ 4.66</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-1001964 ( 1001964 )</td><td>$ 11.00</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2006</td><td>7325431</td><td>$ 7.96</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>2621050</td><td>$ 27.24</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>exercised</td><td>-1273119 ( 1273119 )</td><td>$ 7.28</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-314242 ( 314242 )</td><td>$ 12.44</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2006</td><td>8359120</td><td>$ 13.94</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>options assumed through business combination</td><td>1424332</td><td>$ 21.37</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>granted</td><td>3784508</td><td>$ 40.64</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>exercised</td><td>-2179286 ( 2179286 )</td><td>$ 12.06</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-964740 ( 964740 )</td><td>$ 22.38</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>outstanding at december 30 2007</td><td>10423934</td><td>$ 24.26</td></tr></table> illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the number of options granted by the price per share in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "153802405.12" } ]
CONVFINQA720	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 20 of 100 segment sales were $ 100.7 million lower in 2009 than in 2008 , primarily as a result of the impact of lower aluminum prices partially offset by an increase in sales volumes . the higher sales volumes in 2009 were the result of incremental volumes from the four plants purchased from ab inbev , partially offset by certain plant closures and lower sales volumes in the existing business . segment earnings in 2010 were $ 122.3 million higher than in 2009 primarily due to a net $ 85 million impact related to the higher sales volumes and $ 45 million of product mix and improved manufacturing performance associated with higher production . also adding to the 2010 improvement was the effect of a $ 7 million out-of-period inventory charge in 2009 . the details of the out-of-period adjustment are included in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included within item 8 of this report . segment earnings in 2009 were higher than in 2008 due to $ 12 million of earnings contribution from the four acquired plants and approximately $ 21 million of savings associated with plant closures . partially offsetting these favorable impacts were lower carbonated soft drink and beer can sales volumes ( excluding the newly acquired plants ) and approximately $ 25 million related to higher cost inventories in the first half of 2009 . metal beverage packaging , europe . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1697.6</td><td>$ 1739.5</td><td>$ 1868.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment earnings</td><td>$ 212.9</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation costs ( a )</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total segment earnings</td><td>$ 209.7</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) further details of these items are included in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . the metal beverage packaging , europe , segment includes metal beverage packaging products manufactured in europe . ball packaging europe has manufacturing plants located in germany , the united kingdom , france , the netherlands , poland and serbia , and is the second largest metal beverage container business in europe . segment sales in 2010 decreased $ 41.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange effects of $ 93 million and price and mix changes , partially offset by higher sales volumes . segment sales in 2009 as compared to 2008 were $ 129.2 million lower due to $ 110 million of unfavorable foreign exchange effects , partially offset by better commercial terms . sales volumes in 2009 were essentially flat compared to those in the prior year . segment earnings in 2010 decreased $ 1.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily the result of a $ 28 million increase related to higher sales volumes , offset by $ 18 million of negative effects from foreign currency translation and $ 12 million of higher inventory and other costs . while 2009 sales volumes were consistent with the prior year , the adverse effects of foreign currency translation , both within europe and on the conversion of the euro to the u.s . dollar , reduced segment earnings by $ 8 million . also contributing to lower segment earnings were higher cost inventory carried into 2009 and a change in sales mix , partially offset by better commercial terms in some of our contracts . on january 18 , 2011 , ball acquired aerocan s.a.s . ( aerocan ) , a leading european supplier of aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , for 20ac222.4 million ( approximately $ 300 million ) in cash and assumed debt . aerocan manufactures extruded aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , and the aluminum slugs used to make them , for customers in the personal care , pharmaceutical , beverage and food industries . it operates three aerosol can manufacturing plants 2013 one each in the czech republic , france and the united kingdom 2013 and is a 51 percent owner of a joint venture aluminum slug plant in france . the four plants employ approximately 560 people . the acquisition of aerocan will allow ball to enter a growing part of the metal packaging industry and to broaden the company 2019s market development efforts into a new customer base. .\nQuestion: what was the difference of segment sales in 2009 to 2008?\nAnswer: 129.2\nQuestion: what was the decrease in segment sales in 2010?\nAnswer: 41.9\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "87.3" } ]
CONVFINQA5038	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ -26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>$ 27.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>-27.5 ( 27.5 )</td><td>28.4</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we had $ 1642.1 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2013 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2013 were the australian dollar , brazilian real , euro , japanese yen and the south african rand . based on 2013 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase between 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2013 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .\nQuestion: what was the interest income in 2013?\nAnswer: 24.7\nQuestion: and what was it in 2012?\nAnswer: 29.5\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in interest income over the year?\nAnswer: -4.8\nQuestion: what was the total interest income in 2012?\nAnswer: 29.5\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2012 total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.16271" } ]
CONVFINQA1702	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nas of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 9127</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>8336</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8350</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>7741</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>7577</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>9873</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 51004</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 9.4 million , $ 8.1 million and $ 5.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . upon completion of construction in 2013 , we concluded that we had forms of continued economic involvement in the facility , and therefore did not meet with the provisions for sale-leaseback accounting . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . therefore , the lease is accounted for as a financing obligation and lease payments will be attributed to ( 1 ) a reduction of the principal financing obligation ; ( 2 ) imputed interest expense ; and ( 3 ) land lease expense , representing an imputed cost to lease the underlying land of the building . at the conclusion of the initial lease term , we will de-recognize both the net book values of the asset and the remaining financing obligation . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 39.6 million and $ 41.2 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 1.9 million and $ 37.7 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation amounted to $ 1.3 million for each of the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the total of future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases in 2018?\nAnswer: 9127.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2019?\nAnswer: 8336.0\nQuestion: how much, then, did the 2018 total represent in relation to the 2019 one?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.09489" } ]
CONVFINQA2857	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n22 general mills 2014 annual report 23 gross margin declined 1 percent in fiscal 2014 versus fiscal 2013 . gross margin as a percent of net sales of 36 percent was relatively flat compared to fiscal 2013 . selling , general and administrative ( sg&a ) expenses decreased $ 78 million in fiscal 2014 versus fiscal 2013 . the decrease in sg&a expenses was primarily driven by a 3 percent decrease in advertising and media expense , a smaller contribution to the general mills foundation , a decrease in incentive compensation expense and lower pension expense compared to fiscal 2013 . in fiscal 2014 , we recorded a $ 39 million charge related to venezuela currency devaluation compared to a $ 9 million charge in fiscal 2013 . in addition , we recorded $ 12 million of inte- gration costs in fiscal 2013 related to our acquisition of yoki . sg&a expenses as a percent of net sales decreased 1 percent compared to fiscal 2013 . restructuring , impairment , and other exit costs totaled $ 4 million in fiscal 2014 . the restructuring charge related to a productivity and cost savings plan approved in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 . these restructuring actions were completed in fiscal 2014 . in fiscal 2014 , we paid $ 22 million in cash related to restructuring actions . during fiscal 2014 , we recorded a divestiture gain of $ 66 million related to the sale of certain grain elevators in our u.s . retail segment . there were no divestitures in fiscal 2013 . interest , net for fiscal 2014 totaled $ 302 million , $ 15 million lower than fiscal 2013 . the average interest rate decreased 41 basis points , including the effect of the mix of debt , generating a $ 31 million decrease in net interest . average interest bearing instruments increased $ 367 million , generating a $ 16 million increase in net interest . our consolidated effective tax rate for fiscal 2014 was 33.3 percent compared to 29.2 percent in fiscal 2013 . the 4.1 percentage point increase was primarily related to the restructuring of our general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) subsidiary during the first quarter of 2013 which resulted in a $ 63 million decrease to deferred income tax liabilities related to the tax basis of the investment in gmc and certain distributed assets , with a correspond- ing non-cash reduction to income taxes . during fiscal 2013 , we also recorded a $ 34 million discrete decrease in income tax expense and an increase in our deferred tax assets related to certain actions taken to restore part of the tax benefits associated with medicare part d subsidies which had previously been reduced in fiscal 2010 with the enactment of the patient protection and affordable care act , as amended by the health care and education reconciliation act of 2010 . our fiscal 2013 tax expense also includes a $ 12 million charge associated with the liquidation of a corporate investment . after-tax earnings from joint ventures for fiscal 2014 decreased to $ 90 million compared to $ 99 million in fiscal 2013 primarily driven by increased consumer spending at cereal partners worldwide ( cpw ) and unfavorable foreign currency exchange from h e4agen- dazs japan , inc . ( hdj ) . the change in net sales for each joint venture is set forth in the following table : joint venture change in net sales as reported constant currency basis fiscal 2014 fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 vs . 2013 cpw ( 1 ) % ( % ) flat . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cpw</td><td>as reported fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 ( 1 ) % ( % )</td><td>constant currency basis fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 flat</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hdj</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>9</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>joint ventures</td><td>( 2 ) % ( % )</td><td>2</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr></table> in fiscal 2014 , cpw net sales declined by 1 percent- age point due to unfavorable foreign currency exchange . contribution from volume growth was flat compared to fiscal 2013 . in fiscal 2014 , net sales for hdj decreased 8 percentage points from fiscal 2013 as 11 percentage points of contributions from volume growth was offset by 17 percentage points of net sales decline from unfa- vorable foreign currency exchange and 2 percentage points of net sales decline attributable to unfavorable net price realization and mix . average diluted shares outstanding decreased by 20 million in fiscal 2014 from fiscal 2013 due primar- ily to the repurchase of 36 million shares , partially offset by the issuance of 7 million shares related to stock compensation plans . fiscal 2014 consolidated balance sheet analysis cash and cash equivalents increased $ 126 million from fiscal 2013 . receivables increased $ 37 million from fiscal 2013 pri- marily driven by timing of sales . inventories increased $ 14 million from fiscal 2013 . prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased $ 29 million from fiscal 2013 , mainly due to a decrease in other receivables related to the liquidation of a corporate investment . land , buildings , and equipment increased $ 64 million from fiscal 2013 , as $ 664 million of capital expenditures .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the after-tax earnings from joint ventures primarily driven by increased consumer spending at cereal partners worldwide ( cpw ) and unfavorable foreign currency exchange from h e4agen- dazs japan , inc . from 2012 to 2013\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-9.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9239	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at october 1 2010</td><td>$ 19900</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>935</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11334</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr></table> the company 2019s major tax jurisdictions as of september 30 , 2011 are the united states , california , iowa , singapore and canada . for the united states , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 1998 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for california and iowa , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for singapore , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2011 . for canada , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2004 . during the year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company did not recognize any significant amount of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the expiration of the statute of limitations . the company 2019s policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties , if incurred , on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense . the company recognized $ 0.5 million of accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2011 . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock at september 30 , 2011 , the company is authorized to issue 525000000 shares of common stock , par value $ 0.25 per share of which 195407396 shares are issued and 186386197 shares outstanding . holders of the company 2019s common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the company 2019s board of directors out of funds legally available for such purpose . dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all accrued dividends on preferred stock , if any , have been paid or declared and set aside . in the event of the company 2019s liquidation , dissolution or winding up , the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to holders of any outstanding preferred stock . each holder of the company 2019s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the holder 2019s name . no holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors . the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that , unless otherwise determined by the company 2019s board of directors , no holder of common stock has any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any stock of any class which the company may issue or sell . on august 3 , 2010 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to repurchase up to $ 200.0 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements . during the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company paid approximately $ 70.0 million ( including commissions ) in connection with the repurchase of 2768045 shares of its common stock ( paying an average price of $ 25.30 per share ) . as of september 30 , 2011 , $ 130.0 million remained available under the existing share repurchase program . page 110 skyworks / annual report 2011 .\nQuestion: what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "32136.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2688	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 123 , as amended by sfas no . 148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 . the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>approximate risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.23% ( 4.23 % )</td><td>4.00% ( 4.00 % )</td><td>4.53% ( 4.53 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan )</td><td>80.6% ( 80.6 % )</td><td>86.6% ( 86.6 % )</td><td>92.3% ( 92.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans )</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) . the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico . the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure . during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 . no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 . ( see note 10. ) .\nQuestion: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7.05" } ]
CONVFINQA6072	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 selling costs increased $ 25.0 million to $ 94.6 million in 2010 from $ 69.6 million in 2009 . this increase was primarily due to higher personnel and other costs incurred for the continued expansion of our direct to consumer distribution channel and higher selling personnel costs , including increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , selling costs increased to 8.9% ( 8.9 % ) in 2010 from 8.1% ( 8.1 % ) in 2009 primarily due to higher personnel and other costs incurred for the continued expansion of our factory house stores . 2022 product innovation and supply chain costs increased $ 25.0 million to $ 96.8 million in 2010 from $ 71.8 million in 2009 primarily due to higher personnel costs for the design and sourcing of our expanding apparel , footwear and accessories lines and higher distribution facilities operating and personnel costs as compared to the prior year to support our growth in net revenues . in addition , we incurred higher expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , product innovation and supply chain costs increased to 9.1% ( 9.1 % ) in 2010 from 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) in 2009 primarily due to the items noted above . 2022 corporate services costs increased $ 24.0 million to $ 98.6 million in 2010 from $ 74.6 million in 2009 . this increase was attributable primarily to higher corporate facility costs , information technology initiatives and corporate personnel costs , including increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , corporate services costs increased to 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) in 2010 from 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) in 2009 primarily due to the items noted above . income from operations increased $ 27.1 million , or 31.8% ( 31.8 % ) , to $ 112.4 million in 2010 from $ 85.3 million in 2009 . income from operations as a percentage of net revenues increased to 10.6% ( 10.6 % ) in 2010 from 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) in 2009 . this increase was a result of the items discussed above . interest expense , net remained unchanged at $ 2.3 million in 2010 and 2009 . other expense , net increased $ 0.7 million to $ 1.2 million in 2010 from $ 0.5 million in 2009 . the increase in 2010 was due to higher net losses on the combined foreign currency exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in the euro and canadian dollar and our derivative financial instruments as compared to 2009 . provision for income taxes increased $ 4.8 million to $ 40.4 million in 2010 from $ 35.6 million in 2009 . our effective tax rate was 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) in 2010 compared to 43.2% ( 43.2 % ) in 2009 , primarily due to tax planning strategies and federal and state tax credits reducing the effective tax rate , partially offset by a valuation allowance recorded against our foreign net operating loss carryforward . segment results of operations year ended december 31 , 2011 compared to year ended december 31 , 2010 net revenues by geographic region are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>north america</td><td>$ 1383346</td><td>$ 997816</td><td>$ 385530</td><td>38.6% ( 38.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other foreign countries</td><td>89338</td><td>66111</td><td>23227</td><td>35.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 1472684</td><td>$ 1063927</td><td>$ 408757</td><td>38.4% ( 38.4 % )</td></tr></table> net revenues in our north american operating segment increased $ 385.5 million to $ 1383.3 million in 2011 from $ 997.8 million in 2010 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations . net revenues in other foreign countries increased by $ 23.2 million to $ 89.3 million in 2011 from $ 66.1 million in 2010 primarily due to footwear shipments to our dome licensee , as well as unit sales growth to our distributors in our latin american operating segment. .\nQuestion: what is the increase in provision for income taxes?\nAnswer: 4.8\nQuestion: what was the provision for income taxes in 2009?\nAnswer: 35.6\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.13483\nQuestion: what is the total revenue generated by north america in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1383346.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10965	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>masco</td><td>$ 128.21</td><td>$ 120.32</td><td>$ 102.45</td><td>$ 165.80</td><td>$ 229.59</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 125.92</td><td>$ 144.58</td><td>$ 147.60</td><td>$ 171.04</td><td>$ 225.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p industrials index</td><td>$ 120.19</td><td>$ 151.89</td><td>$ 150.97</td><td>$ 173.87</td><td>$ 243.73</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p consumer durables & apparel index</td><td>$ 136.29</td><td>$ 177.91</td><td>$ 191.64</td><td>$ 232.84</td><td>$ 316.28</td></tr></table> in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2010?\nAnswer: 144.58\nQuestion: and what was it in 2009?\nAnswer: 125.92\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.14819" } ]
CONVFINQA7957	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nissuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2012 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) amount available for future share repurchases the program ( b ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a )</td><td>amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012</td><td>842445</td><td>$ 93.38</td><td>842445</td><td>$ 2522</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012</td><td>872973</td><td>90.86</td><td>872973</td><td>2443</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012</td><td>1395288</td><td>92.02</td><td>1395288</td><td>2315</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>3110706</td><td>$ 92.07</td><td>3110706</td><td>$ 2315</td></tr></table> ( a ) we repurchased a total of 3.1 million shares of our common stock for $ 286 million during the quarter ended december 31 , 2012 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2010 . ( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , authorizing an amount available for share repurchases of $ 6.5 billion . under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . the program does not have an expiration date . as of december 31 , 2012 , we had repurchased a total of 54.3 million shares under the program for $ 4.2 billion. .\nQuestion: what were the number of shares repurchased during december 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1395288.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2786	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe fair value of performance awards is calculated using the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant . the weighted-average grant date fair value of performance awards granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 77.33 , $ 60.00 and $ 55.97 , respectively . vested performance share units approximated 148000 shares as of 2013 year end , 213000 shares as of 2012 year end and 54208 shares as of 2011 year end . performance share units of 213459 shares were paid out in 2013 and 53990 shares were paid out in 2012 ; no performance share units were paid out in 2011 . earned performance share units are generally paid out following the conclusion of the applicable performance period upon approval by the organization and executive compensation committee of the company 2019s board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) . based on the company 2019s 2013 performance , 84413 rsus granted in 2013 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2015 . based on the company 2019s 2012 performance , 95047 rsus granted in 2012 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2014 . based on the company 2019s 2011 performance , 159970 rsus granted in 2011 were earned ; these rsus vested as of fiscal 2013 year end and were paid out shortly thereafter . as a result of employee retirements , a total of 1614 of the rsus earned in 2012 and 2011 vested pursuant to the terms of the related award agreements and the underlying shares were paid out in the third quarter of 2013 . the changes to the company 2019s non-vested performance awards in 2013 are as follows : shares ( in thousands ) fair value price per share* . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( in thousands )</td><td>fair valueprice pershare</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested performance awards at beginning of year</td><td>509</td><td>$ 59.36</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>180</td><td>77.33</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-306 ( 306 )</td><td>58.94</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancellations</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>69.23</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested performance awards at end of year</td><td>381</td><td>68.13</td></tr></table> weighted-average as of 2013 year end there was approximately $ 12.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance awards that is expected to be recognized as a charge to earnings over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years . stock appreciation rights ( 201csars 201d ) the company also issues cash-settled and stock-settled sars to certain key non-u.s . employees . sars have a contractual term of ten years and vest ratably on the first , second and third anniversaries of the date of grant . sars are granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant . cash-settled sars provide for the cash payment of the excess of the fair market value of snap-on 2019s common stock price on the date of exercise over the grant price . cash-settled sars have no effect on dilutive shares or shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the grant price is paid in cash and not in common stock . in 2013 , the company began issuing stock-settled sars that are accounted for as equity instruments and provide for the issuance of snap-on common stock equal to the amount by which the company 2019s stock has appreciated over the exercise price . stock-settled sars have an effect on dilutive shares and shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the exercise price will be settled in shares of common stock . 2013 annual report 101 .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of non-vested performance awards during the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-128.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3320	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\noperations may be extended up to four additional years for each unit by mutual agreement of entergy and new york state based on an exigent reliability need for indian point generation . in accordance with the ferc-approved tariff of the new york independent system operator ( nyiso ) , entergy submitted to the nyiso a notice of generator deactivation based on the dates in the settlement ( no later than april 30 , 2020 for indian point unit 2 and april 30 , 2021 for indian point unit 3 ) . in december 2017 , nyiso issued a report stating there will not be a system reliability need following the deactivation of indian point . the nyiso also has advised that it will perform an analysis of the potential competitive impacts of the proposed retirement under provisions of its tariff . the deadline for the nyiso to make a withholding determination is in dispute and is pending before the ferc . in addition to contractually agreeing to cease commercial operations early , in february 2017 entergy filed with the nrc an amendment to its license renewal application changing the term of the requested licenses to coincide with the latest possible extension by mutual agreement based on exigent reliability needs : april 30 , 2024 for indian point 2 and april 30 , 2025 for indian point 3 . if entergy reasonably determines that the nrc will treat the amendment other than as a routine amendment , entergy may withdraw the amendment . other provisions of the settlement include termination of all then-existing investigations of indian point by the agencies signing the agreement , which include the new york state department of environmental conservation , the new york state department of state , the new york state department of public service , the new york state department of health , and the new york state attorney general . the settlement recognizes the right of new york state agencies to pursue new investigations and enforcement actions with respect to new circumstances or existing conditions that become materially exacerbated . another provision of the settlement obligates entergy to establish a $ 15 million fund for environmental projects and community support . apportionment and allocation of funds to beneficiaries are to be determined by mutual agreement of new york state and entergy . the settlement recognizes new york state 2019s right to perform an annual inspection of indian point , with scope and timing to be determined by mutual agreement . in may 2017 a plaintiff filed two parallel state court appeals challenging new york state 2019s actions in signing and implementing the indian point settlement with entergy on the basis that the state failed to perform sufficient environmental analysis of its actions . all signatories to the settlement agreement , including the entergy affiliates that hold nrc licenses for indian point , were named . the appeals were voluntarily dismissed in november 2017 . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital ratio for entergy as of december 31 , 2017 is primarily due to an increase in commercial paper outstanding in 2017 as compared to 2016. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt to capital</td><td>67.1% ( 67.1 % )</td><td>64.8% ( 64.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of excluding securitization bonds</td><td>( 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) )</td><td>( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>66.3% ( 66.3 % )</td><td>63.8% ( 63.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of subtracting cash</td><td>( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )</td><td>( 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>65.2% ( 65.2 % )</td><td>61.8% ( 61.8 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , new orleans , and texas securitization bonds , which are non- recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy new orleans , and entergy texas , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the net debt-to-net capital excluding securitization bonds from 2016 to 2017?\nAnswer: 3.4\nQuestion: and what was that amount in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "61.8" } ]
CONVFINQA5875	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nborrowings reflect net proceeds received from the issuance of senior notes in june 2015 . see liquidity and capital resources below for additional information . in november 2015 , we repaid our $ 1 billion 0.90% ( 0.90 % ) senior notes upon maturity . in october 2015 , we announced an adjustment to our quarterly dividend . see capital requirements below for additional information . additions to property , plant and equipment are our most significant use of cash and cash equivalents . the following table shows capital expenditures related to continuing operations by segment and reconciles to additions to property , plant and equipment as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows for 2015 , 2014 and 2013: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>north america e&p</td><td>$ 2553</td><td>$ 4698</td><td>$ 3649</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international e&p</td><td>368</td><td>534</td><td>456</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>oil sands mining ( a )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>212</td><td>286</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>corporate</td><td>25</td><td>51</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total capital expenditures</td><td>2936</td><td>5495</td><td>4449</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>change in capital expenditure accrual</td><td>540</td><td>-335 ( 335 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions to property plant and equipment</td><td>$ 3476</td><td>$ 5160</td><td>$ 4443</td></tr></table> ( a ) reflects reimbursements earned from the governments of canada and alberta related to funds previously expended for quest ccs capital equipment . quest ccs was successfully completed and commissioned in the fourth quarter of 2015 . during 2014 , we acquired 29 million shares at a cost of $ 1 billion and in 2013 acquired 14 million shares at a cost of $ 500 million . there were no share repurchases in 2015 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for discussion of purchases of common stock . liquidity and capital resources on june 10 , 2015 , we issued $ 2 billion aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes which consist of the following series : 2022 $ 600 million of 2.70% ( 2.70 % ) senior notes due june 1 , 2020 2022 $ 900 million of 3.85% ( 3.85 % ) senior notes due june 1 , 2025 2022 $ 500 million of 5.20% ( 5.20 % ) senior notes due june 1 , 2045 interest on each series of senior notes is payable semi-annually beginning december 1 , 2015 . we used the aggregate net proceeds to repay our $ 1 billion 0.90% ( 0.90 % ) senior notes on november 2 , 2015 , and the remainder for general corporate purposes . in may 2015 , we amended our $ 2.5 billion credit facility to increase the facility size by $ 500 million to a total of $ 3.0 billion and extend the maturity date by an additional year such that the credit facility now matures in may 2020 . the amendment additionally provides us the ability to request two one-year extensions to the maturity date and an option to increase the commitment amount by up to an additional $ 500 million , subject to the consent of any increasing lenders . the sub-facilities for swing-line loans and letters of credit remain unchanged allowing up to an aggregate amount of $ 100 million and $ 500 million , respectively . fees on the unused commitment of each lender , as well as the borrowing options under the credit facility , remain unchanged . our main sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents , internally generated cash flow from operations , capital market transactions , our committed revolving credit facility and sales of non-core assets . our working capital requirements are supported by these sources and we may issue either commercial paper backed by our $ 3.0 billion revolving credit facility or draw on our $ 3.0 billion revolving credit facility to meet short-term cash requirements or issue debt or equity securities through the shelf registration statement discussed below as part of our longer-term liquidity and capital management . because of the alternatives available to us as discussed above , we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund not only our current operations , but also our near-term and long-term funding requirements including our capital spending programs , dividend payments , defined benefit plan contributions , repayment of debt maturities and other amounts that may ultimately be paid in connection with contingencies . general economic conditions , commodity prices , and financial , business and other factors could affect our operations and our ability to access the capital markets . a downgrade in our credit ratings could negatively impact our cost of capital and our ability to access the capital markets , increase the interest rate and fees we pay on our unsecured revolving credit facility , restrict our access to the commercial paper market , or require us to post letters of credit or other forms of collateral for certain .\nQuestion: what was the total of the additions to property plant and equipment in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3476.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6494	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncash flows from operations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal year 2018</td><td>fiscal year 2017</td><td>fiscal year 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrollinginterests</td><td>$ 2163.0</td><td>$ 1701.1</td><td>$ 1736.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>618.8</td><td>603.6</td><td>608.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>after-taxearnings from joint ventures</td><td>-84.7 ( 84.7 )</td><td>-85.0 ( 85.0 )</td><td>-88.4 ( 88.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>distributions of earnings from joint ventures</td><td>113.2</td><td>75.6</td><td>75.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock-based compensation</td><td>77.0</td><td>95.7</td><td>89.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-504.3 ( 504.3 )</td><td>183.9</td><td>120.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit plan contributions</td><td>-31.8 ( 31.8 )</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>-47.8 ( 47.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit plan costs</td><td>4.6</td><td>35.7</td><td>118.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>divestitures loss ( gain )</td><td>-</td><td>13.5</td><td>-148.2 ( 148.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>restructuring impairment and other exit costs</td><td>126.0</td><td>117.0</td><td>107.2</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>changes in current assets and liabilities excluding the effects of acquisitions anddivestitures</td><td>542.1</td><td>-194.2 ( 194.2 )</td><td>298.5</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>other net</td><td>-182.9 ( 182.9 )</td><td>-86.3 ( 86.3 )</td><td>-105.6 ( 105.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2841.0</td><td>$ 2415.2</td><td>$ 2764.2</td></tr></table> in fiscal 2018 , cash provided by operations was $ 2.8 billion compared to $ 2.4 billion in fiscal 2017 . the $ 426 million increase was primarily driven by the $ 462 million increase in net earnings and the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities , partially offset by a $ 688 million change in deferred income taxes . the change in deferred income taxes was primarily related to the $ 638 million provisional benefit from revaluing our net u.s . deferred tax liabilities to reflect the new u.s . corporate tax rate as a result of the tcja . the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in accounts payable of $ 476 million related to the extension of payment terms and timing of payments , and $ 264 million of changes in other current liabilities primarily driven by changes in income taxes payable , trade and advertising accruals , and incentive accruals . we strive to grow core working capital at or below the rate of growth in our net sales . for fiscal 2018 , core working capital decreased 27 percent , compared to a net sales increase of 1 percent . in fiscal 2017 , core working capital increased 9 percent , compared to a net sales decline of 6 percent , and in fiscal 2016 , core working capital decreased 41 percent , compared to net sales decline of 6 percent . in fiscal 2017 , our operations generated $ 2.4 billion of cash , compared to $ 2.8 billion in fiscal 2016 . the $ 349 million decrease was primarily driven by a $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities . the $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in other current liabilities driven by changes in income taxes payable , a decrease in incentive accruals , and changes in trade and advertising accruals due to reduced spending . the change in current assets and liabilities was also impacted by the timing of accounts payable . additionally , we recorded a $ 14 million loss on a divestiture during fiscal 2017 , compared to a $ 148 million net gain on divestitures during fiscal 2016 , and classified the related cash flows as investing activities. .\nQuestion: what was the value for earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and non controlling interests in 2018?\nAnswer: 2163.0\nQuestion: what was the value for earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and non controlling interests in 2017?\nAnswer: 1701.1\nQuestion: what is the difference in values between 2017 and 2018?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "461.9" } ]
CONVFINQA4503	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n14 . capital stock and earnings per share we are authorized to issue 250 million shares of preferred stock , none of which were issued or outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 . the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net earnings available to common stockholders . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the denominator for diluted earnings per share is weighted average shares outstanding adjusted for the effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards . the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations for the years ending december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share</td><td>215.0</td><td>227.3</td><td>235.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards</td><td>0.8</td><td>1.0</td><td>2.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share</td><td>215.8</td><td>228.3</td><td>237.5</td></tr></table> weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share 215.0 227.3 235.5 effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards 0.8 1.0 2.0 weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share 215.8 228.3 237.5 for the year ended december 31 , 2009 , an average of 14.3 million options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common stock . for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , an average of 11.2 million and 3.1 million options , respectively , were not included . during 2009 , we repurchased approximately 19.8 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 46.56 per share for a total cash outlay of $ 923.7 million , including commissions . in april 2008 , we announced that our board of directors authorized a $ 1.25 billion share repurchase program which was originally set to expire on december 31 , 2009 . in september 2009 , the board of directors extended this program to december 31 , 2010 . approximately $ 211.1 million remains authorized for future repurchases under this plan . 15 . segment data we design , develop , manufacture and market orthopaedic reconstructive implants , dental implants , spinal implants , trauma products and related surgical products which include surgical supplies and instruments designed to aid in surgical procedures and post-operation rehabilitation . we also provide other healthcare-related services . revenue related to these services currently represents less than 1 percent of our total net sales . we manage operations through three major geographic segments 2013 the americas , which is comprised principally of the united states and includes other north , central and south american markets ; europe , which is comprised principally of europe and includes the middle east and africa ; and asia pacific , which is comprised primarily of japan and includes other asian and pacific markets . this structure is the basis for our reportable segment information discussed below . management evaluates reportable segment performance based upon segment operating profit exclusive of operating expenses pertaining to global operations and corporate expenses , share-based compensation expense , settlement , certain claims , acquisition , integration , realignment and other expenses , net curtailment and settlement , inventory step-up , in-process research and development write-offs and intangible asset amortization expense . global operations include research , development engineering , medical education , brand management , corporate legal , finance , and human resource functions and u.s . and puerto rico-based manufacturing operations and logistics . intercompany transactions have been eliminated from segment operating profit . management reviews accounts receivable , inventory , property , plant and equipment , goodwill and intangible assets by reportable segment exclusive of u.s . and puerto rico-based manufacturing operations and logistics and corporate assets . z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 9 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg* transmitting job : c55340 pcn : 060000000 *%%pcmsg\|60 \|00007\|yes\|no\|02/24/2010 01:32\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what was the net change in weighted shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share from 2007 to 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-20.5" } ]
CONVFINQA7057	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nequity equity at december 31 , 2014 was $ 6.6 billion , a decrease of $ 1.6 billion from december 31 , 2013 . the decrease resulted primarily due to share repurchases of $ 2.3 billion , $ 273 million of dividends to shareholders , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 760 million , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion . the $ 760 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss from december 31 , 2013 , primarily reflects the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 504 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 an increase of $ 260 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , 2022 net derivative gains of $ 5 million , and 2022 net investment losses of $ 1 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 7834</td><td>$ 7789</td><td>$ 7632</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1648</td><td>1540</td><td>1493</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>21.0% ( 21.0 % )</td><td>19.8% ( 19.8 % )</td><td>19.6% ( 19.6 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated with employment levels , corporate revenue and asset values . during 2014 , pricing was flat on average globally , and we would still consider this to be a \"soft market.\" in a soft market , premium rates flatten or decrease , along with commission revenues , due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity . changes in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry , as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds . additionally , continuing through 2014 , we faced difficult conditions as a result of continued weakness in the global economy , the repricing of credit risk and the deterioration of the financial markets . weak economic conditions in many markets around the globe have reduced our customers' demand for our retail brokerage and reinsurance brokerage products , which have had a negative impact on our operational results . risk solutions generated approximately 65% ( 65 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 . revenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients , commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies , and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients . our revenues vary from quarter to quarter throughout the year as a result of the timing of our clients' policy renewals , the net effect of new and lost business , the timing of services provided to our clients , and the income we earn on investments , which is heavily influenced by short-term interest rates . we operate in a highly competitive industry and compete with many retail insurance brokerage and agency firms , as well as with individual brokers , agents , and direct writers of insurance coverage . specifically , we address the highly specialized .\nQuestion: what was the operating income in 2014?\nAnswer: 1648.0\nQuestion: and that in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1540.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9681	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nchanges in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield . the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges . on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income . foreign currency risk we are exposed to foreign currency risks that arise from normal business operations . these risks include the translation of local currency balances of foreign subsidiaries , transaction gains and losses associated with intercompany loans with foreign subsidiaries and transactions denominated in currencies other than a location's functional currency . we manage the exposure to these risks through a combination of normal operating activities and the use of foreign currency forward contracts . contracts are denominated in currtt encies of major industrial countries . our exposure to foreign currency exchange risks generally arises from our non-u.s . operations , to the extent they are conducted ind local currency . changes in foreign currency exchange rates affect translations of revenues denominated in currencies other than the u.s . dollar . during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , we generated approximately $ 1909 million , $ 1336 million and $ 1229 million , respectively , in revenues denominated in currencies other than the u.s . dollar . the major currencies to which our revenues are exposed are the brazilian real , the euro , the british pound sterling and the indian rupee . a 10% ( 10 % ) move in average exchange rates for these currencies ( assuming a simultaneous and immediate 10% ( 10 % ) change in all of such rates for the relevant period ) would have resulted in the following increase or ( decrease ) in our reported revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>currency</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pound sterling</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 31</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>euro</td><td>38</td><td>33</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>real</td><td>32</td><td>29</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indian rupee</td><td>12</td><td>10</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total impact</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 106</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> while our results of operations have been impacted by the effects of currency fluctuations , our international operations' revenues and expenses are generally denominated in local currency , which reduces our economic exposure to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions . revenues included $ 100 million and $ 243 million and net earnings included $ 10 million , anrr d $ 31 million , respectively , of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2016 and 2015 resulting from a stronger u.s . dollar during these years compared to thet preceding year . in 2017 , we expect continued unfavorable foreign currency impact on our operating income resulting from the continued strengthening of the u.s . dollar vs . other currencies . our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for trading purposes or to engage in speculative activitr y . we do periodically enter inttt o foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives are intended to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to intercompany loans but have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes . we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( \"inr\" ) exchange rates . as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was ll less than $ 1 million . these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges . the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third m party banks , at the balance sheet date . the fair value of forward contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates . the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges . in conjunction with entering into the definitive agreement to acquire clear2pay in september 2014 , we initiated a foreign currency forward contract to purchase euros and sell u.s . dollars to manage the risk arising from fluctuations in exchange rates until the closing because the purchase price was stated in euros . as this derivative did not qualify for hedge accounting , we recorded a charge of $ 16 million in other income ( expense ) , net during the third quarter of 2014 . this forward contract was settled on october 1 , 2014. .\nQuestion: what is the total impact of currency exchange in revenue in 2015?\nAnswer: 106.0\nQuestion: what about in 2014?\nAnswer: 107.0\nQuestion: what is the net difference among these years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-1.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7714	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 144 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report compared with $ 57 million for 2009 . decreases in cio and mort- gage banking var for 2010 were again driven by the decline in market volatility and position changes . the decline in mortgage banking var at december 31 , 2010 , reflects management 2019s deci- sion to reduce risk given market volatility at the time . the firm 2019s average ib and other var diversification benefit was $ 59 million or 37% ( 37 % ) of the sum for 2010 , compared with $ 82 million or 28% ( 28 % ) of the sum for 2009 . the firm experienced an increase in the diversification benefit in 2010 as positions changed and correla- tions decreased . in general , over the course of the year , var expo- sure can vary significantly as positions change , market volatility fluctuates and diversification benefits change . var back-testing the firm conducts daily back-testing of var against its market risk- related revenue , which is defined as the change in value of : princi- pal transactions revenue for ib and cio ( less private equity gains/losses and revenue from longer-term cio investments ) ; trading-related net interest income for ib , cio and mortgage bank- ing ; ib brokerage commissions , underwriting fees or other revenue ; revenue from syndicated lending facilities that the firm intends to distribute ; and mortgage fees and related income for the firm 2019s mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans , msrs , and all related hedges . daily firmwide market risk 2013related revenue excludes gains and losses from dva . the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib , cio and mortgage banking positions for 2010 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 248 out of 261 days in this period , with 12 days exceeding $ 210 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ex- ceeded the actual loss on each of those days . during 2010 , losses were sustained on 13 days , none of which exceeded the var measure . daily ib and other market risk-related gains and losses ( 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ) year ended december 31 , 2010 average daily revenue : $ 87 million $ in millions $ in millions daily ib and other var less market risk-related losses the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in december 31 , ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 35</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 39</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the basis point increase in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "35.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5711	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninvestment policy , which is described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . we calculate the expense associated with the pension plan and the assumptions and methods that we use include a policy of reflecting trust assets at their fair market value . on an annual basis , we review the actuarial assumptions related to the pension plan , including the discount rate , the rate of compensation increase and the expected return on plan assets . the discount rate and compensation increase assumptions do not significantly affect pension expense . however , the expected long-term return on assets assumption does significantly affect pension expense . our expected long- term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension expense has been 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) for the past three years . the expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption established by considering historical and anticipated returns of the asset classes invested in by the pension plan and the allocation strategy currently in place among those classes . while this analysis gives appropriate consideration to recent asset performance and historical returns , the assumption represents a long-term prospective return . we review this assumption at each measurement date and adjust it if warranted . for purposes of setting and reviewing this assumption , 201clong- term 201d refers to the period over which the plan 2019s projected benefit obligation will be disbursed . while year-to-year annual returns can vary significantly ( rates of return for the reporting years of 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 were +20.61% ( +20.61 % ) , -32.91% ( -32.91 % ) , and +7.57% ( +7.57 % ) , respectively ) , the assumption represents our estimate of long-term average prospective returns . our selection process references certain historical data and the current environment , but primarily utilizes qualitative judgment regarding future return expectations . recent annual returns may differ but , recognizing the volatility and unpredictability of investment returns , we generally do not change the assumption unless we modify our investment strategy or identify events that would alter our expectations of future returns . to evaluate the continued reasonableness of our assumption , we examine a variety of viewpoints and data . various studies have shown that portfolios comprised primarily of us equity securities have returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) over long periods of time , while us debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation of equities and bonds produces a result between 8% ( 8 % ) and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns , and in many cases low returns in recent time periods are followed by higher returns in future periods ( and vice versa ) . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from other observers . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2009 was 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) , unchanged from 2008 . during 2010 , we intend to decrease the midpoint of the plan 2019s target allocation range for equities by approximately five percentage points . as a result of this change and taking into account all other factors described above , pnc will change the expected long-term return on plan assets to 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) for determining net periodic pension cost for 2010 . under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to change by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2010 estimated expense as a baseline . change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2010 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2010pensionexpense ( inmillions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 3</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 41 million in 2010 compared with pretax expense of $ 117 million in 2009 . this year-over-year reduction was primarily due to the amortization impact of the favorable 2009 investment returns as compared with the expected long-term return assumption . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we expect that the minimum required contributions under the law will be zero for 2010 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various .\nQuestion: what was the pretax expense in 2009, in millions?\nAnswer: 117.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2010, also in millions?\nAnswer: 41.0\nQuestion: by what amount, then, did it decrease over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "76.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7022	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npackaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2005 9 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) stockholder received proceeds , net of the underwriting discount , of $ 20.69 per share . the company did not sell any shares in , or receive any proceeds from , the secondary offering . concurrent with the closing of the secondary offering on december 21 , 2005 , the company entered into a common stock repurchase agreement with pca holdings llc . pursuant to the repurchase agreement , the company purchased 4500000 shares of common stock directly from pca holdings llc at the initial price to the public net of the underwriting discount or $ 20.69 per share , the same net price per share received by pca holdings llc in the secondary offering . these shares were retired on december 21 , 2005 . 10 . commitments and contingencies capital commitments the company had authorized capital expenditures of approximately $ 33.1 million and $ 55.2 million as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in connection with the expansion and replacement of existing facilities and equipment . operating leases pca leases space for certain of its facilities and cutting rights to approximately 108000 acres of timberland under long-term leases . the company also leases equipment , primarily vehicles and rolling stock , and other assets under long-term leases of a duration generally of three years . the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 24569</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>21086</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>14716</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>9801</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>6670</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>37130</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 113972</td></tr></table> capital lease obligations were not significant to the accompanying financial statements . total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 35.8 million , $ 33.0 million and $ 31.6 million , respectively . these costs are included in cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses. .\nQuestion: what was total lease expense in 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "35.8" } ]
CONVFINQA2549	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsources and uses of cash ( in millions ) in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 29 , dec 30 , dec 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 292018</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 29432</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-11239 ( 11239 )</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-18607 ( 18607 )</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -414 ( 414 )</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td></tr></table> md&a consolidated results and analysis 40 .\nQuestion: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2018?\nAnswer: 29432.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2017?\nAnswer: 22110.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7322.0" } ]
CONVFINQA711	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrecourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage , residential mortgage and home equity loans directly or indirectly through securitization and loan sale transactions in which we have continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 11.7 billion and $ 12.8 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 3.6 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 3.9 billion at december 31 , 2012 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 33 million and $ 43 million as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . table 152 : analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 43</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . for additional information on loan sales see note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities . our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with fha and va-insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , pnc reached agreements with both fnma and fhlmc to resolve their repurchase claims with respect to loans sold between 2000 and 2008 . pnc paid a total of $ 191 million related to these settlements . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines of credit that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition of national city . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines of credit is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . indemnification and repurchase liabilities are initially recognized when loans are sold to investors and are subsequently evaluated by management . initial recognition and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for the sold residential mortgage portfolio are recognized in residential mortgage revenue on the consolidated income statement . since pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , only subsequent adjustments are recognized to the home equity loans/lines indemnification and repurchase liability . these adjustments are recognized in other noninterest income on the consolidated income statement . 214 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what is the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements in 2012?\nAnswer: 3.6\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\nAnswer: 3.9\nQuestion: what is the total for these two years?\nAnswer: 7.5\nQuestion: what is the average of these two years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.75" } ]
CONVFINQA3278	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .\nQuestion: what was the value of accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis as of 1/1/07?\nAnswer: 65.0\nQuestion: and for the period as of 12/31/07?\nAnswer: 69.0\nQuestion: combining these two values, what is the total?\nAnswer: 134.0\nQuestion: and the gross utb balance as of 1/107?\nAnswer: 691.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage of interest and penalties in the gross utb balance?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.19392" } ]
CONVFINQA7497	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfailure to comply with the financial and other covenants under our credit facilities , as well as the occurrence of certain material adverse events , would constitute defaults and would allow the lenders under our credit facilities to accelerate the maturity of all indebtedness under the related agreements . this could also have an adverse impact on the availability of financial assurances . in addition , maturity acceleration on our credit facilities constitutes an event of default under our other debt instruments , including our senior notes , and , therefore , our senior notes would also be subject to acceleration of maturity . if such acceleration were to occur , we would not have sufficient liquidity available to repay the indebtedness . we would likely have to seek an amendment under our credit facilities for relief from the financial covenants or repay the debt with proceeds from the issuance of new debt or equity , or asset sales , if necessary . we may be unable to amend our credit facilities or raise sufficient capital to repay such obligations in the event the maturities are accelerated . financial assurance we are required to provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities under applicable environmental regulations relating to our landfill operations for capping , closure and post-closure costs , and related to our performance under certain collection , landfill and transfer station contracts . we satisfy these financial assurance requirements by providing surety bonds , letters of credit , insurance policies or trust deposits . the amount of the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs is determined by applicable state environmental regulations . the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs may be associated with a portion of the landfill or the entire landfill . generally , states will require a third-party engineering specialist to determine the estimated capping , closure and post- closure costs that are used to determine the required amount of financial assurance for a landfill . the amount of financial assurance required can , and generally will , differ from the obligation determined and recorded under u.s . gaap . the amount of the financial assurance requirements related to contract performance varies by contract . additionally , we are required to provide financial assurance for our insurance program and collateral for certain performance obligations . we do not expect a material increase in financial assurance requirements during 2010 , although the mix of financial assurance instruments may change . these financial instruments are issued in the normal course of business and are not debt of our company . since we currently have no liability for these financial assurance instruments , they are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets . however , we record capping , closure and post-closure liabilities and self-insurance liabilities as they are incurred . the underlying obligations of the financial assurance instruments , in excess of those already reflected in our consolidated balance sheets , would be recorded if it is probable that we would be unable to fulfill our related obligations . we do not expect this to occur . off-balance sheet arrangements we have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations , other than financial assurance instruments and operating leases that are not classified as debt . we do not guarantee any third-party debt . free cash flow we define free cash flow , which is not a measure determined in accordance with u.s . gaap , as cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment , plus proceeds from sales of property and equipment as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows . our free cash flow for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 is calculated as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1396.5</td><td>$ 512.2</td><td>$ 661.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases of property and equipment</td><td>-826.3 ( 826.3 )</td><td>-386.9 ( 386.9 )</td><td>-292.5 ( 292.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from sales of property and equipment</td><td>31.8</td><td>8.2</td><td>6.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 602.0</td><td>$ 133.5</td><td>$ 374.9</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the cash provided by operating activities of 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "512.2" } ]
CONVFINQA3102	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2018</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 1013.0</td><td>$ 852.1</td><td>$ 1018.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash ( used in ) provided by working capital2</td><td>-431.1 ( 431.1 )</td><td>5.3</td><td>-410.3 ( 410.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities</td><td>-16.8 ( 16.8 )</td><td>24.4</td><td>-95.5 ( 95.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 565.1</td><td>$ 881.8</td><td>$ 512.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2491.5 ( 2491.5 )</td><td>-196.2 ( 196.2 )</td><td>-263.9 ( 263.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash provided by ( used in ) financing activities</td><td>1853.2</td><td>-1004.9 ( 1004.9 )</td><td>-666.4 ( 666.4 )</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , net losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , accounts receivable billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities due to the seasonality of our business , we typically use cash from working capital in the first nine months of a year , with the largest impact in the first quarter , and generate cash from working capital in the fourth quarter , driven by the seasonally strong media spending by our clients . quarterly and annual working capital results are impacted by the fluctuating annual media spending budgets of our clients as well as their changing media spending patterns throughout each year across various countries . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients across various countries affects our working capital and operating cash flow and can be volatile . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved , which substantially exceed our revenues , primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , accounts payable , accrued liabilities and contract liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . net cash provided by operating activities during 2018 was $ 565.1 , which was a decrease of $ 316.7 as compared to 2017 , primarily as a result of an increase in working capital usage of $ 436.4 . working capital in 2018 was impacted by the spending levels of our clients as compared to 2017 . the working capital usage in both periods was primarily attributable to our media businesses . net cash provided by operating activities during 2017 was $ 881.8 , which was an increase of $ 369.0 as compared to 2016 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 415.6 . working capital in 2017 benefited from the spending patterns of our clients compared to 2016 . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2018 consisted of payments for acquisitions of $ 2309.8 , related mostly to the acxiom acquisition , and payments for capital expenditures of $ 177.1 , related mostly to leasehold improvements and computer hardware and software. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in net cash provided by operating activities between 2016 and 2017?\nAnswer: 1394.6\nQuestion: and this value for 2018?\nAnswer: 565.1\nQuestion: so what was the total value for all three years?\nAnswer: 1959.7\nQuestion: and the average during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "653.23333" } ]
CONVFINQA1882	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhigher average borrowings . additionally , the recapitalization that occurred late in the first quarter of 2005 resulted in a full year of interest in 2006 as compared to approximately ten months in 2005 . the increase in interest expense in 2005 as compared to 2004 also resulted from the recapitalization in 2005 . income tax expense income tax expense totaled $ 150.2 million , $ 116.1 million and $ 118.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . this resulted in an effective tax rate of 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) , 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) and 37.6% ( 37.6 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . net earnings net earnings totaled $ 259.1 million , $ 196.6 and $ 189.4 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , or $ 1.37 , $ 1.53 and $ 1.48 per diluted share , respectively . segment results of operations transaction processing services ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>processing and services revenues</td><td>$ 2458777</td><td>$ 1208430</td><td>$ 892033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of revenues</td><td>1914148</td><td>904124</td><td>667078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross profit</td><td>544629</td><td>304306</td><td>224955</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>selling general and administrative expenses</td><td>171106</td><td>94889</td><td>99581</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>research and development costs</td><td>70879</td><td>85702</td><td>54038</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 302644</td><td>$ 123715</td><td>$ 71336</td></tr></table> revenues for the transaction processing services segment are derived from three main revenue channels ; enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international . revenues from transaction processing services totaled $ 2458.8 million , $ 1208.4 and $ 892.0 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1250.4 million during 2006 , as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 1067.2 million to the overall increase . the majority of the remaining 2006 growth is attributable to organic growth within the historically owned integrated financial solutions and international revenue channels , with international including $ 31.9 million related to the newly formed business process outsourcing operation in brazil . the overall segment increase of $ 316.4 in 2005 as compared to 2004 results from the inclusion of a full year of results for the 2004 acquisitions of aurum , sanchez , kordoba , and intercept , which contributed $ 301.1 million of the increase . cost of revenues for the transaction processing services segment totaled $ 1914.1 million , $ 904.1 million and $ 667.1 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1010.0 million during 2006 as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 848.2 million to the increase . gross profit as a percentage of revenues ( 201cgross margin 201d ) was 22.2% ( 22.2 % ) , 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) and 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the decrease in gross profit in 2006 as compared to 2005 is primarily due to the february 1 , 2006 certegy merger , which businesses typically have lower margins than those of the historically owned fis businesses . incremental intangible asset amortization relating to the certegy merger also contributed to the decrease in gross margin . included in cost of revenues was depreciation and amortization of $ 272.4 million , $ 139.8 million , and $ 94.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . selling , general and administrative expenses totaled $ 171.1 million , $ 94.9 million and $ 99.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the increase in 2006 compared to 2005 is primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 73.7 million to the overall increase of $ 76.2 million . the decrease of $ 4.7 million in 2005 as compared to 2004 is primarily attributable to the effect of acquisition related costs in 2004 . included in selling , general and administrative expenses was depreciation and amortization of $ 11.0 million , $ 9.1 million and $ 2.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in operating income from 2005 to 2006?\nAnswer: 178929.0\nQuestion: what was the operating income in 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "123715.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9392	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncredit facilities as our bermuda subsidiaries are not admitted insurers and reinsurers in the u.s. , the terms of certain u.s . insurance and reinsurance contracts require them to provide collateral , which can be in the form of locs . in addition , ace global markets is required to satisfy certain u.s . regulatory trust fund requirements which can be met by the issuance of locs . locs may also be used for general corporate purposes and to provide underwriting capacity as funds at lloyd 2019s . the following table shows our main credit facilities by credit line , usage , and expiry date at december 31 , 2010 . ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) credit line ( 1 ) usage expiry date . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>creditline ( 1 )</td><td>usage</td><td>expiry date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>syndicated letter of credit facility</td><td>$ 1000</td><td>$ 574</td><td>nov . 2012</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>revolving credit/loc facility ( 2 )</td><td>500</td><td>370</td><td>nov . 2012</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>bilateral letter of credit facility</td><td>500</td><td>500</td><td>sept . 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>funds at lloyds 2019s capital facilities ( 3 )</td><td>400</td><td>340</td><td>dec . 2015</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2400</td><td>$ 1784</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) certain facilities are guaranteed by operating subsidiaries and/or ace limited . ( 2 ) may also be used for locs . ( 3 ) supports ace global markets underwriting capacity for lloyd 2019s syndicate 2488 ( see discussion below ) . in november 2010 , we entered into four letter of credit facility agreements which collectively permit the issuance of up to $ 400 million of letters of credit . we expect that most of the locs issued under the loc agreements will be used to support the ongoing funds at lloyd 2019s requirements of syndicate 2488 , but locs may also be used for other general corporate purposes . it is anticipated that our commercial facilities will be renewed on expiry but such renewals are subject to the availability of credit from banks utilized by ace . in the event that such credit support is insufficient , we could be required to provide alter- native security to clients . this could take the form of additional insurance trusts supported by our investment portfolio or funds withheld using our cash resources . the value of letters of credit required is driven by , among other things , statutory liabilities reported by variable annuity guarantee reinsurance clients , loss development of existing reserves , the payment pattern of such reserves , the expansion of business , and loss experience of such business . the facilities in the table above require that we maintain certain covenants , all of which have been met at december 31 , 2010 . these covenants include : ( i ) maintenance of a minimum consolidated net worth in an amount not less than the 201cminimum amount 201d . for the purpose of this calculation , the minimum amount is an amount equal to the sum of the base amount ( currently $ 13.8 billion ) plus 25 percent of consolidated net income for each fiscal quarter , ending after the date on which the current base amount became effective , plus 50 percent of any increase in consolidated net worth during the same period , attributable to the issuance of common and preferred shares . the minimum amount is subject to an annual reset provision . ( ii ) maintenance of a maximum debt to total capitalization ratio of not greater than 0.35 to 1 . under this covenant , debt does not include trust preferred securities or mezzanine equity , except where the ratio of the sum of trust preferred securities and mezzanine equity to total capitalization is greater than 15 percent . in this circumstance , the amount greater than 15 percent would be included in the debt to total capitalization ratio . at december 31 , 2010 , ( a ) the minimum consolidated net worth requirement under the covenant described in ( i ) above was $ 14.5 billion and our actual consolidated net worth as calculated under that covenant was $ 21.6 billion and ( b ) our ratio of debt to total capitalization was 0.167 to 1 , which is below the maximum debt to total capitalization ratio of 0.35 to 1 as described in ( ii ) above . our failure to comply with the covenants under any credit facility would , subject to grace periods in the case of certain covenants , result in an event of default . this could require us to repay any outstanding borrowings or to cash collateralize locs under such facility . a failure by ace limited ( or any of its subsidiaries ) to pay an obligation due for an amount exceeding $ 50 million would result in an event of default under all of the facilities described above . ratings ace limited and its subsidiaries are assigned debt and financial strength ( insurance ) ratings from internationally recognized rating agencies , including s&p , a.m . best , moody 2019s investors service , and fitch . the ratings issued on our companies by these agencies are announced publicly and are available directly from the agencies . our internet site , www.acegroup.com .\nQuestion: in the year of 2010, what percentage did the usage represent in relation to the total creditline?\nAnswer: 0.74333\nQuestion: and what portion of this creditline did the syndicated letter of credit facility represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.41667" } ]
CONVFINQA5397	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmajority of the increased tax position is attributable to temporary differences . the increase in 2014 current period tax positions related primarily to the company 2019s change in tax accounting method filed in 2008 for repair and maintenance costs on its utility plant . the company does not anticipate material changes to its unrecognized tax benefits within the next year . if the company sustains all of its positions at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , an unrecognized tax benefit of $ 9444 and $ 7439 , respectively , excluding interest and penalties , would impact the company 2019s effective tax rate . the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2012</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-5965 ( 5965 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 13555</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3176 ( 3176 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2014</td><td>$ 10379</td></tr></table> included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based operations segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 13 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and commingled funds including equity and bond funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies , real estate funds and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees. .\nQuestion: in 2013, what amount from the company 2019s valuation allowance consisted of a discrete tax benefit?\nAnswer: 2979.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of that valuation allowance?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "13555.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1469	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are an international energy company with operations in the u.s. , canada , africa , the middle east and europe . our operations are organized into three reportable segments : 2022 e&p which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis . 2022 osm which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil . 2022 ig which produces and markets products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in e.g . certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward- looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business . these statements typically contain words such as \"anticipates\" \"believes\" \"estimates\" \"expects\" \"targets\" \"plans\" \"projects\" \"could\" \"may\" \"should\" \"would\" or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain . in accordance with \"safe harbor\" provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements . for additional risk factors affecting our business , see item 1a . risk factors in this annual report on form 10-k . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 . business , item 1a . risk factors and item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data found in this annual report on form 10-k . spin-off downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , the spin-off of marathon 2019s downstream business was completed , creating two independent energy companies : marathon oil and mpc . marathon stockholders at the close of business on the record date of june 27 , 2011 received one share of mpc common stock for every two shares of marathon common stock held . a private letter tax ruling received in june 2011 from the irs affirmed the tax-free nature of the spin-off . activities related to the downstream business have been treated as discontinued operations in 2011 and 2010 ( see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information ) . overview 2013 market conditions exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows . the following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price annual averages for the past three years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 94.15</td><td>$ 95.11</td><td>$ 79.61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 111.26</td><td>$ 79.51</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a )</td><td>$ 2.79</td><td>$ 4.04</td><td>$ 4.39</td></tr></table> henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) $ 2.79 $ 4.04 $ 4.39 ( a ) settlement date average . liquid hydrocarbon 2013 prices of crude oil have been volatile in recent years , but less so when comparing annual averages for 2012 and 2011 . in 2011 , crude prices increased over 2010 levels , with increases in brent averages outstripping those in wti . the quality , location and composition of our liquid hydrocarbon production mix will cause our u.s . liquid hydrocarbon realizations to differ from the wti benchmark . in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the percentage of our u.s . crude oil and condensate production that was sour averaged 37 percent , 58 percent and 68 percent . sour crude contains more sulfur and tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil so that refining it is more costly and produces lower value products ; therefore , sour crude is considered of lower quality and typically sells at a discount to wti . the percentage of our u.s . crude and condensate production that is sour has been decreasing as onshore production from the eagle ford and bakken shale plays increases and production from the gulf of mexico declines . in recent years , crude oil sold along the u.s . gulf coast has been priced at a premium to wti because the louisiana light sweet benchmark has been tracking brent , while production from inland areas farther from large refineries has been at a discount to wti . ngls were 10 percent , 7 percent and 6 percent of our u.s . liquid hydrocarbon sales in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . in 2012 , our sales of ngls increased due to our development of u.s . unconventional liquids-rich plays. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the average price of wti crude oil between 2010 and 2012?\nAnswer: 14.54\nQuestion: and the specific price in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "79.61" } ]
CONVFINQA3108	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest increased $ 64 million , or 9.8% ( 9.8 % ) , to $ 710 million in 2013 from $ 646 million in 2012 primarily due to special charges of $ 92 million to recognize post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consists principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating income in 2012 consisted principally of a $ 280 million special credit related to the settlement of a commercial dispute partially offset by net foreign currency losses . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension and postretirement benefits</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -66 ( 66 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>1733</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td><td>1951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>170</td><td>67</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td><td>$ 2179</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify such financing or facility agreement and the debtors believed that it was probable the motion would be approved , and there was sufficient information to estimate the claim . see note 2 to american 2019s consolidated financial statements in part ii , item 8b for further information . ( 3 ) pursuant to the plan , the debtors agreed to allow certain post-petition unsecured claims on obligations . as a result , during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , american recorded reorganization charges to adjust estimated allowed claim amounts previously recorded on rejected special facility revenue bonds of $ 180 million , allowed general unsecured claims related to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at jfk , and rejected bonds that financed certain improvements at ord , which are included in the table above . ( 4 ) the plan allowed unsecured creditors receiving aag series a preferred stock a conversion discount of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) . accordingly , american recorded the fair value of such discount upon the confirmation of the plan by the bankruptcy court. .\nQuestion: what was the value of total re-organization costs in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2640.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10986	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005************************************************************* $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*********************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*********************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*********************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*********************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ****************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments********************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td><td>aggregate debt maturities</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 13.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>11.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>8.9</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>8.0</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>7.2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1.1</td><td>267.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total obligations and commitments</td><td>$ 49.8</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*********************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*********************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*********************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*********************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*********************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ****************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************ $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. .\nQuestion: what is the total expense for all operating leases in 2004?\nAnswer: 14.0\nQuestion: what about in 2003?\nAnswer: 12.3\nQuestion: what is the difference in total expense for all operating leases?\nAnswer: 1.7\nQuestion: what is the total expense for all operating leases in 2003?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12.3" } ]
CONVFINQA9573	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nas approximately 161 acres of undeveloped land and a 12-acre container storage facility in houston . the total price was $ 89.7 million and was financed in part through assumption of secured debt that had a fair value of $ 34.3 million . of the total purchase price , $ 64.1 million was allocated to in-service real estate assets , $ 20.0 million was allocated to undeveloped land and the container storage facility , $ 5.4 million was allocated to lease related intangible assets , and the remaining amount was allocated to acquired working capital related assets and liabilities . the results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements . in february 2007 , we completed the acquisition of bremner healthcare real estate ( 201cbremner 201d ) , a national health care development and management firm . the primary reason for the acquisition was to expand our development capabilities within the health care real estate market . the initial consideration paid to the sellers totaled $ 47.1 million , and the sellers may be eligible for further contingent payments over a three-year period following the acquisition . approximately $ 39.0 million of the total purchase price was allocated to goodwill , which is attributable to the value of bremner 2019s overall development capabilities and its in-place workforce . the results of operations for bremner since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing operations in our consolidated financial statements . in february 2006 , we acquired the majority of a washington , d.c . metropolitan area portfolio of suburban office and light industrial properties ( the 201cmark winkler portfolio 201d ) . the assets acquired for a purchase price of approximately $ 867.6 million were comprised of 32 in-service properties with approximately 2.9 million square feet for rental , 166 acres of undeveloped land , as well as certain related assets of the mark winkler company , a real estate management company . the acquisition was financed primarily through assumed mortgage loans and new borrowings . the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition , as summarized below ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating rental properties</td><td>$ 602011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>undeveloped land</td><td>154300</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total real estate investments</td><td>756311</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other assets</td><td>10478</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>lease related intangible assets</td><td>86047</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>14722</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>867558</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>debt assumed</td><td>-148527 ( 148527 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other liabilities assumed</td><td>-5829 ( 5829 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>purchase price net of assumed liabilities</td><td>$ 713202</td></tr></table> purchase price , net of assumed liabilities $ 713202 in december 2006 , we contributed 23 of these in-service properties acquired from the mark winkler portfolio with a basis of $ 381.6 million representing real estate investments and acquired lease related intangible assets to two new unconsolidated subsidiaries . of the remaining nine in-service properties , eight were contributed to these two unconsolidated subsidiaries in 2007 and one remains in continuing operations as of december 31 , 2008 . the eight properties contributed in 2007 had a basis of $ 298.4 million representing real estate investments and acquired lease related intangible assets , and debt secured by these properties of $ 146.4 million was also assumed by the unconsolidated subsidiaries . in the third quarter of 2006 , we finalized the purchase of a portfolio of industrial real estate properties in savannah , georgia . we completed a majority of the purchase in january 2006 . the assets acquired for a purchase price of approximately $ 196.2 million were comprised of 18 buildings with approximately 5.1 million square feet for rental as well as over 60 acres of undeveloped land . the acquisition was financed in part through assumed mortgage loans . the results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements. .\nQuestion: what was the value of total real estate investments?\nAnswer: 756311.0\nQuestion: what was the value of total assets acquired?\nAnswer: 867558.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of total real estate investments to total assets acquired?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.87177" } ]
CONVFINQA4210	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents valero energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) commodity price risk we are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of crude oil , refined products ( primarily gasoline and distillate ) , grain ( primarily corn ) , and natural gas used in our operations . to reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows , we use commodity derivative instruments , including futures , swaps , and options . we use the futures markets for the available liquidity , which provides greater flexibility in transacting our hedging and trading operations . we use swaps primarily to manage our price exposure . our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been approved by our board of directors . for risk management purposes , we use fair value hedges , cash flow hedges , and economic hedges . in addition to the use of derivative instruments to manage commodity price risk , we also enter into certain commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes . our objective for entering into each type of hedge or trading derivative is described below . fair value hedges fair value hedges are used to hedge price volatility in certain refining inventories and firm commitments to purchase inventories . the level of activity for our fair value hedges is based on the level of our operating inventories , and generally represents the amount by which our inventories differ from our previous year-end lifo inventory levels . as of december 31 , 2012 , we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were entered into to hedge crude oil and refined product inventories and commodity derivative instruments related to the physical purchase of crude oil and refined products at a fixed price . the information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity ( volumes in thousands of barrels ) . notional contract volumes by year of maturity derivative instrument 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>derivative instrument</td><td>notionalcontractvolumes byyear ofmaturity 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>crude oil and refined products:</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>futures 2013 long</td><td>1052</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>futures 2013 short</td><td>4857</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>physical contracts - long</td><td>3805</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the volume of futures 2013 short?\nAnswer: 4857.0\nQuestion: what is that times 2?\nAnswer: 9714.0\nQuestion: what is the volume of physical contracts - long?\nAnswer: 3805.0\nQuestion: what is the doubled volume of shorts less the volume of physical contracts - long?\nAnswer: 5909.0\nQuestion: what is that less futures 2013 long?\nAnswer: 4857.0\nQuestion: what is that divided by the volume of 2013 long?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.61692" } ]
CONVFINQA1165	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmeasurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>booking holdings inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>187.37</td><td>141.63</td><td>132.39</td><td>163.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>183.79</td><td>162.09</td><td>150.51</td><td>158.81</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>205.51</td><td>173.33</td><td>152.59</td><td>224.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>236.31</td><td>187.19</td><td>170.84</td><td>235.33</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017</td><td>280.10</td><td>242.29</td><td>208.14</td><td>338.52</td></tr></table> sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 . the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election . in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) . the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the \"act\" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .\nQuestion: what was the price of booking holdings inc. in 2017?\nAnswer: 280.1\nQuestion: and the change in price between this time and the original investment?\nAnswer: 180.1\nQuestion: and the percentage change during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.801" } ]
CONVFINQA1841	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2013, what what was the balance in the investment securities portfolio, in billions?\nAnswer: 347.562\nQuestion: and what would be that balance without the htm securities?\nAnswer: 323.562\nQuestion: and in the previous year, what was the total of litigation reserves?\nAnswer: 3.7\nQuestion: what was it in 2011?\nAnswer: 3.2\nQuestion: by how much, then, did it increase from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: 0.5\nQuestion: and what is this increase as a percentage of the reserves?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.15625" } ]
CONVFINQA5244	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nguarantees to third parties . we have , however , issued guar- antees and comfort letters of $ 171 million for the debt and other obligations of unconsolidated affiliates , primarily for cpw . in addition , off-balance sheet arrangements are gener- ally limited to the future payments under noncancelable operating leases , which totaled $ 408 million at may 28 , at may 28 , 2006 , we had invested in four variable interest entities ( vies ) . we are the primary beneficiary ( pb ) of general mills capital , inc . ( gm capital ) , a subsidiary that we consolidate as set forth in note eight to the consoli- dated financial statements appearing on pages 43 and 44 in item eight of this report . we also have an interest in a contract manufacturer at our former facility in geneva , illi- nois . even though we are the pb , we have not consolidated this entity because it is not material to our results of oper- ations , financial condition , or liquidity at may 28 , 2006 . this entity had property and equipment of $ 50 million and long-term debt of $ 50 million at may 28 , 2006 . we are not the pb of the remaining two vies . our maximum exposure to loss from these vies is limited to the $ 150 million minority interest in gm capital , the contract manufactur- er 2019s debt and our $ 6 million of equity investments in the two remaining vies . the following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations , including payments due by period . the majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw mate- rial and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer-directed marketing commit- ments that support our brands . the net fair value of our interest rate and equity swaps was $ 159 million at may 28 , 2006 , based on market values as of that date . future changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future . other long-term obligations primarily consist of income taxes , accrued compensation and benefits , and miscella- neous liabilities . we are unable to estimate the timing of the payments for these items . we do not have significant statutory or contractual funding requirements for our defined-benefit retirement and other postretirement benefit plans . further information on these plans , including our expected contributions for fiscal 2007 , is set forth in note thirteen to the consolidated financial statements appearing on pages 47 through 50 in item eight of this report . in millions , payments due by fiscal year total 2007 2008-09 2010-11 2012 and thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millionspayments dueby fiscal year</td><td>total</td><td>2007</td><td>2008-09</td><td>2010-11</td><td>2012 andthereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 4546</td><td>$ 2131</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 1389</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrued interest</td><td>152</td><td>152</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>408</td><td>92</td><td>142</td><td>89</td><td>85</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchaseobligations</td><td>2351</td><td>2068</td><td>144</td><td>75</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 7457</td><td>$ 4443</td><td>$ 1257</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 1538</td></tr></table> significant accounting estimates for a complete description of our significant accounting policies , please see note one to the consolidated financial statements appearing on pages 35 through 37 in item eight of this report . our significant accounting estimates are those that have meaningful impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations . these poli- cies include our accounting for trade and consumer promotion activities ; goodwill and other intangible asset impairments ; income taxes ; and pension and other postretirement benefits . trade and consumer promotion activities we report sales net of certain coupon and trade promotion costs . the consumer coupon costs recorded as a reduction of sales are based on the estimated redemption value of those coupons , as determined by historical patterns of coupon redemption and consideration of current market conditions such as competitive activity in those product categories . the trade promotion costs include payments to customers to perform merchandising activities on our behalf , such as advertising or in-store displays , discounts to our list prices to lower retail shelf prices , and payments to gain distribution of new products . the cost of these activi- ties is recognized as the related revenue is recorded , which generally precedes the actual cash expenditure . the recog- nition of these costs requires estimation of customer participation and performance levels . these estimates are made based on the quantity of customer sales , the timing and forecasted costs of promotional activities , and other factors . differences between estimated expenses and actual costs are normally insignificant and are recognized as a change in management estimate in a subsequent period . our accrued trade and consumer promotion liability was $ 339 million as of may 28 , 2006 , and $ 283 million as of may 29 , 2005 . our unit volume in the last week of each quarter is consis- tently higher than the average for the preceding weeks of the quarter . in comparison to the average daily shipments in the first 12 weeks of a quarter , the final week of each quarter has approximately two to four days 2019 worth of incre- mental shipments ( based on a five-day week ) , reflecting increased promotional activity at the end of the quarter . this increased activity includes promotions to assure that our customers have sufficient inventory on hand to support major marketing events or increased seasonal demand early in the next quarter , as well as promotions intended to help achieve interim unit volume targets . if , due to quarter-end promotions or other reasons , our customers purchase more product in any reporting period than end-consumer demand will require in future periods , our sales level in future reporting periods could be adversely affected. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in accrued trade and consumer promotion liability as of 5/28/06 and 5/29/05?\nAnswer: 56.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.19788" } ]
CONVFINQA3549	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock-based compensation 2013 we have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options , nonvested retention shares , and nonvested stock units . we refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as 201cretention awards 201d . we issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings , while new shares are issued when retention shares vest . we adopted fasb statement no . 123 ( r ) , share-based payment ( fas 123 ( r ) ) , on january 1 , 2006 . fas 123 ( r ) requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors , including stock options . compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards ( generally the vesting period ) . the fair value of retention awards is the stock price on the date of grant , while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . we elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by fas 123 ( r ) and did not restate financial results for prior periods . we did not make an adjustment for the cumulative effect of these estimated forfeitures , as the impact was not material . as a result of the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we recognized expense for stock options in 2006 , in addition to retention awards , which were expensed prior to 2006 . stock-based compensation expense for the year ended december 31 , 2006 was $ 22 million , after tax , or $ 0.08 per basic and diluted share . this includes $ 9 million for stock options and $ 13 million for retention awards for 2006 . before taxes , stock-based compensation expense included $ 14 million for stock options and $ 21 million for retention awards for 2006 . we recorded $ 29 million of excess tax benefits as an inflow of financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . prior to the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we applied the recognition and measurement principles of accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , accounting for stock issued to employees , and related interpretations . no stock- based employee compensation expense related to stock option grants was reflected in net income , as all options granted under those plans had a grant price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . stock-based compensation expense related to retention shares , stock units , and other incentive plans was reflected in net income . the following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense year ended december 31 , millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td><td>$ 604</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td><td>$ 582</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 2.33</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td><td>$ 2.25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td><td>$ 2.30</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td><td>$ 2.22</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the .\nQuestion: what is the difference between earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma and 2013 diluted pro forma in 2005?\nAnswer: 0.04\nQuestion: what is the earnings per share of 2013 diluted pro forma in 2005?\nAnswer: 3.75\nQuestion: what is difference divided by the 2013 diluted pro forma value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.01067" } ]
CONVFINQA9445	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) fiscal years ended may 27 , 2007 , may 28 , 2006 , and may 29 , 2005 columnar amounts in millions except per share amounts 6 . impairment of debt and equity securities during fiscal 2005 , the company determined that the carrying values of its investments in two unrelated equity method investments , a bio-fuels venture and a malt venture , were other-than-temporarily impaired and therefore recognized pre-tax impairment charges totaling $ 71.0 million ( $ 65.6 million after tax ) . during fiscal 2006 , the company recognized additional impairment charges totaling $ 75.8 million ( $ 73.1 million after tax ) of its investments in the malt venture and an unrelated investment in a foreign prepared foods business , due to further declines in the estimated proceeds from the disposition of these investments . the investment in a foreign prepared foods business was disposed of in fiscal 2006 . the extent of the impairments was determined based upon the company 2019s assessment of the recoverability of its investments based primarily upon the expected proceeds of planned dispositions of the investments . during fiscal 2007 , the company completed the disposition of the equity method investment in the malt venture for proceeds of approximately $ 24 million , including notes and other receivables totaling approximately $ 7 million . this transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $ 4 million , with a related tax benefit of approximately $ 4 million . these charges and the subsequent gain on disposition are reflected in equity method investment earnings ( loss ) in the consolidated statements of earnings . the company held , at may 28 , 2006 , subordinated notes in the original principal amount of $ 150 million plus accrued interest of $ 50.4 million from swift foods . during the company 2019s fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 , swift foods effected changes in its capital structure . as a result of those changes , the company determined that the fair value of the subordinated notes was impaired . from the date on which the company initially determined that the value of the notes was impaired through the second quarter of fiscal 2006 , the company believed the impairment of this available-for-sale security to be temporary . as such , the company had reduced the carrying value of the note by $ 35.4 million and recorded cumulative after-tax charges of $ 21.9 million in accumulated other comprehensive income as of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2006 . during the second half of fiscal 2006 , due to the company 2019s consideration of current conditions related to the debtor 2019s business and changes in the company 2019s intended holding period for this investment , the company determined that the impairment was other-than-temporary . accordingly , the company reduced the carrying value of the notes to approximately $ 117 million and recognized impairment charges totaling $ 82.9 million in selling , general and administrative expenses , including the reclassification of the cumulative after-tax charges of $ 21.9 million from accumulated other comprehensive income , in fiscal 2006 . during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company closed on the sale of these notes for approximately $ 117 million , net of transaction expenses , resulting in no additional gain or loss . 7 . inventories the major classes of inventories are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>raw materials and packaging</td><td>$ 1154.2</td><td>$ 985.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>work in progress</td><td>95.2</td><td>97.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>finished goods</td><td>1008.1</td><td>923.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>supplies and other</td><td>91.0</td><td>124.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2348.5</td><td>$ 2130.6</td></tr></table> raw materials and packaging includes grain , fertilizer , crude oil , and other trading and merchandising inventory of $ 691.0 million and $ 542.1 million as of the end of fiscal year 2007 and 2006 , respectively. .\nQuestion: in 2006, what percentage of total inventories was made of raw materials and packaging?\nAnswer: 0.46231\nQuestion: and in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.49146" } ]
CONVFINQA1898	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 831.2</td><td>$ 598.4</td><td>$ 697.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital b2</td><td>-131.1 ( 131.1 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>-293.2 ( 293.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td><td>4.1</td><td>-46.8 ( 46.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 669.5</td><td>$ 592.9</td><td>$ 357.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-200.8 ( 200.8 )</td><td>-224.5 ( 224.5 )</td><td>-210.2 ( 210.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities</td><td>-343.9 ( 343.9 )</td><td>-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )</td><td>131.3</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 . due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters . our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses . net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .\nQuestion: what was the cash provided by operating activities?\nAnswer: 669.5\nQuestion: what was the cash used for investing activities?\nAnswer: -200.8\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 468.7\nQuestion: what is the sum including financing activities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "124.8" } ]
CONVFINQA2668	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 831.2</td><td>$ 598.4</td><td>$ 697.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital b2</td><td>-131.1 ( 131.1 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>-293.2 ( 293.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td><td>4.1</td><td>-46.8 ( 46.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 669.5</td><td>$ 592.9</td><td>$ 357.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-200.8 ( 200.8 )</td><td>-224.5 ( 224.5 )</td><td>-210.2 ( 210.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities</td><td>-343.9 ( 343.9 )</td><td>-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )</td><td>131.3</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 . due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters . our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses . net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .\nQuestion: what was the net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?\nAnswer: 592.9\nQuestion: and what was the improvement in that from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: 76.6\nQuestion: how much does this improvement represent in relation to the 2013 net cash?\nAnswer: 0.1292\nQuestion: and how much is that in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12.91955" } ]
CONVFINQA1299	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 59 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 13 . debt and interest costs ( continued ) long-term debt obligations outstanding at december 31 , 2007 , have maturities of $ 127.1 million , $ 160 million , $ 388.4 million , $ 625.1 million and $ 550.3 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and $ 456.1 million thereafter . ball provides letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure liabilities recorded in connection with industrial development revenue bonds and certain self-insurance arrangements . letters of credit outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 41 million and $ 52.4 million , respectively . the notes payable and senior credit facilities are guaranteed on a full , unconditional and joint and several basis by certain of the company 2019s domestic wholly owned subsidiaries . certain foreign denominated tranches of the senior credit facilities are similarly guaranteed by certain of the company 2019s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries . note 22 contains further details as well as condensed , consolidating financial information for the company , segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments , share repurchases , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . on march 27 , 2006 , ball expanded its senior secured credit facilities with the addition of a $ 500 million term d loan facility due in installments through october 2011 . also on march 27 , 2006 , ball issued at a price of 99.799 percent $ 450 million of 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) senior notes ( effective yield to maturity of 6.65 percent ) due in march 2018 . the proceeds from these financings were used to refinance existing u.s . can debt with ball corporation debt at lower interest rates , acquire certain north american plastic container net assets from alcan and reduce seasonal working capital debt . ( see note 3 for further details of the acquisitions. ) on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities to extend debt maturities at lower interest rate spreads and provide the company with additional borrowing capacity for future growth . during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due in august 2006 . the refinancing and senior note redemptions resulted in a debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) for the related call premium and unamortized debt issuance costs . a summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest costs before refinancing costs</td><td>$ 155.8</td><td>$ 142.5</td><td>$ 102.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt refinancing costs</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>19.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total interest costs</td><td>155.8</td><td>142.5</td><td>121.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amounts capitalized</td><td>-6.4 ( 6.4 )</td><td>-8.1 ( 8.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>interest expense</td><td>$ 149.4</td><td>$ 134.4</td><td>$ 116.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest paid during the year ( a )</td><td>$ 153.9</td><td>$ 125.4</td><td>$ 138.5</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 6.6 million paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of the company 2019s senior and senior subordinated notes. .\nQuestion: what was the total amount of senior notes issued in 2006?\nAnswer: 450.0\nQuestion: and converted to the hundred millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "450000000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA11011	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfreesheet paper were higher in russia , but lower in europe reflecting weak economic conditions and market demand . average sales price realizations for pulp decreased . lower input costs for wood and purchased fiber were partially offset by higher costs for energy , chemicals and packaging . freight costs were also higher . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher due to executing a significant once-every-ten-years maintenance outage plus the regularly scheduled 18-month outage at the saillat mill while outage costs in russia and poland were lower . manufacturing operating costs were favor- entering 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be seasonally weaker in russia , but about flat in europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper are expected to decrease in europe , but increase in russia . input costs should be higher in russia , especially for wood and energy , but be slightly lower in europe . no maintenance outages are scheduled for the first quarter . ind ian papers includes the results of andhra pradesh paper mills ( appm ) of which a 75% ( 75 % ) interest was acquired on october 14 , 2011 . net sales were $ 185 million in 2012 and $ 35 million in 2011 . operat- ing profits were a loss of $ 16 million in 2012 and a loss of $ 3 million in 2011 . asian pr int ing papers net sales were $ 85 mil- lion in 2012 , $ 75 million in 2011 and $ 80 million in 2010 . operating profits were improved from break- even in past years to $ 1 million in 2012 . u.s . pulp net sales were $ 725 million in 2012 compared with $ 725 million in 2011 and $ 715 million in 2010 . operating profits were a loss of $ 59 million in 2012 compared with gains of $ 87 million in 2011 and $ 107 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 increased from 2011 primarily due to the start-up of pulp production at the franklin mill in the third quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations were significantly lower for both fluff pulp and market pulp . input costs were lower , primarily for wood and energy . freight costs were slightly lower . mill operating costs were unfavorable primarily due to costs associated with the start-up of the franklin mill . planned maintenance downtime costs were lower . in the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be flat with the fourth quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations are expected to improve reflecting the realization of sales price increases for paper and tissue pulp that were announced in the fourth quarter of 2012 . input costs should be flat . planned maintenance downtime costs should be about $ 9 million higher than in the fourth quarter of 2012 . manufacturing costs related to the franklin mill should be lower as we continue to improve operations . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2012 decreased 15% ( 15 % ) from 2011 and 7% ( 7 % ) from 2010 . operating profits increased 64% ( 64 % ) from 2011 and 29% ( 29 % ) from 2010 . net sales and operating profits include the shorewood business in 2011 and 2010 . exclud- ing asset impairment and other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business , and facility closure costs , 2012 operating profits were 27% ( 27 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 23% ( 23 % ) higher than in 2010 . benefits from lower raw material costs ( $ 22 million ) , lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 5 million ) and other items ( $ 2 million ) were more than offset by lower sales price realizations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 66 million ) , lower sales volumes and increased market-related downtime ( $ 22 million ) , and higher operating costs ( $ 40 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2012 included a gain of $ 3 million related to the sale of the shorewood business while operating profits in 2011 included a $ 129 million fixed asset impairment charge for the north ameri- can shorewood business and $ 72 million for other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3170</td><td>$ 3710</td><td>$ 3400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>268</td><td>163</td><td>207</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2011 and $ 2.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits were $ 165 million ( $ 162 million excluding a gain related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2012 compared with $ 35 million ( $ 236 million excluding asset impairment and other charges asso- ciated with the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2011 and $ 97 million ( $ 105 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting weaker market demand . average sales price realizations were lower , primar- ily for folding carton board . input costs for wood increased , but were partially offset by lower costs for chemicals and energy . planned maintenance down- time costs were slightly lower . market-related down- time was about 113000 tons in 2012 compared with about 38000 tons in 2011. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of net sales in 2012 and 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "220.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4901	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . significant revenue arrangements ( continued ) $ 7 million of development and commercialization milestone payments . additionally , kissei agreed to reimburse the company for certain development costs , including a portion of costs for phase 2 trials of vx-702 . research funding ended under this program in june 2000 , and the company has received the full amount of research funding specified under the agreement . kissei has exclusive rights to develop and commercialize vx-702 in japan and certain far east countries and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . the company retains exclusive marketing rights outside the far east and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . in addition , the company will have the right to supply bulk drug material to kissei for sale in its territory and will receive royalties or drug supply payments on future product sales , if any . in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 6.4 million , $ 7.3 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively , was recognized as revenue under this agreement . the $ 7.3 million of revenue recognized in 2005 includes a $ 2.5 million milestone paid upon kissei 2019s completion of regulatory filings in preparation for phase 1 clinical development of vx-702 in japan . p . employee benefits the company has a 401 ( k ) retirement plan ( the 201cvertex 401 ( k ) plan 201d ) in which substantially all of its permanent employees are eligible to participate . participants may contribute up to 60% ( 60 % ) of their annual compensation to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan , subject to statutory limitations . the company may declare discretionary matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan that are payable in the form of vertex common stock . the match is paid in the form of fully vested interests in a vertex common stock fund . employees have the ability to transfer funds from the company stock fund as they choose . the company declared matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan as follows ( in thousands ) : q . related party transactions as of december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , the company had a loan outstanding to a former officer of the company in the amount of $ 36000 , $ 36000 , $ 97000 , respectively , which was initially advanced in april 2002 . the loan balance is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . in 2001 , the company entered into a four year consulting agreement with a director of the company for the provision of part-time consulting services over a period of four years , at the rate of $ 80000 per year commencing in january 2002 . the consulting agreement terminated in january 2006 . r . contingencies the company has certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities . the company accrues a reserve for contingent liabilities when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31,</td><td>$ 3341</td><td>$ 2894</td><td>$ 2492</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issued during the year ended december 31,</td><td>91</td><td>215</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issuable as of the year ended december 31,</td><td>28</td><td>19</td><td>57</td></tr></table> discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31 , $ 3341 $ 2894 $ 2492 shares issued during the year ended december 31 , 91 215 239 shares issuable as of the year ended december 31 , 28 19 57 .\nQuestion: what was the change in revenue recognized under the agreement from 2004 to 2005, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.8" } ]
CONVFINQA8909	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 30 of 94 are included in capital spending amounts . another example is the company 2019s decision in 2007 to contribute an additional $ 44.5 million ( $ 27.3 million ) to its pension plans as part of its overall debt reduction plan . based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash flows from operating activities</td><td>$ 673.0</td><td>$ 401.4</td><td>$ 558.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>incremental pension funding net of tax</td><td>27.3</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital spending</td><td>-308.5 ( 308.5 )</td><td>-279.6 ( 279.6 )</td><td>-291.7 ( 291.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>proceeds for replacement of fire-damaged assets</td><td>48.6</td><td>61.3</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 440.4</td><td>$ 183.1</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> based on information currently available , we estimate cash flows from operating activities for 2008 to be approximately $ 650 million , capital spending to be approximately $ 350 million and free cash flow to be in the $ 300 million range . capital spending of $ 259.9 million ( net of $ 48.6 million in insurance recoveries ) in 2007 was below depreciation and amortization expense of $ 281 million . we continue to invest capital in our best performing operations , including projects to increase custom can capabilities , improve beverage can and end making productivity and add more beverage can capacity in europe , as well as expenditures in the aerospace and technologies segment . of the $ 350 million of planned capital spending for 2008 , approximately $ 180 million will be spent on top-line sales growth projects . debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2007 , decreased $ 93.1 million to $ 2358.6 million from $ 2451.7 million at december 31 , 2006 . the 2007 debt decrease from 2006 was primarily attributed to debt payments offset by higher foreign exchange rates . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 705 million was available under the company 2019s multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company also had $ 345 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of the year , of which $ 49.7 million was outstanding . on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities and during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due august 2006 primarily through the drawdown of funds under the new credit facilities . the refinancing and redemption resulted in a pretax debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) to reflect the call premium associated with the senior notes and the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs . the company has a receivables sales agreement that provides for the ongoing , revolving sale of a designated pool of trade accounts receivable of ball 2019s north american packaging operations , up to $ 250 million . the agreement qualifies as off-balance sheet financing under the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards ( sfas ) no . 140 , as amended by sfas no . 156 . net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled $ 170 million and $ 201.3 million at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 7 and 13 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .\nQuestion: what is the capital spending amount in 2007?\nAnswer: 308.5\nQuestion: what about in 2006?\nAnswer: 279.6\nQuestion: what is the difference among these years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "28.9" } ]
CONVFINQA8639	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe are exposed to market risk stemming from changes in interest and foreign exchange rates and commod- ity and equity prices . changes in these factors could cause fl uctuations in our earnings and cash fl ows . in the normal course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into vari- ous hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . th e counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative fi nancial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements on page 61 of this report . value at risk th e estimates in the table below are intended to mea- sure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . th e models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confi - dence level . th e var calculation used historical interest and for- eign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . th e market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . th e calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely cor- relates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally off set by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . th e positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; com- modity swaps , futures and options ; and equity instru- ments . th e calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are off set by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . th e table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 28 , 2017 , and may 29 , 2016 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 28 , 2017. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fair value impact may 28 2017</td><td>fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2017</td><td>fair value impact may 29 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate instruments</td><td>$ 25.1</td><td>$ 26.5</td><td>$ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency instruments</td><td>24.6</td><td>22.9</td><td>27.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity instruments</td><td>3.2</td><td>2.5</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity instruments</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.7</td></tr></table> quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk 44 general mills .\nQuestion: what is the fair value impact of interest rate instruments?\nAnswer: 26.5\nQuestion: what is the value of foreign currency instruments?\nAnswer: 22.9\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 49.4\nQuestion: what is the fair value of commodity instruments?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.5" } ]
CONVFINQA2116	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis fully phased-in capital ratios the table below presents our estimated ratio of cet1 to rwas calculated under the basel iii advanced rules and the standardized capital rules on a fully phased-in basis. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>$ 73597</td><td>$ 71267</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets net of deferred tax liabilities</td><td>-3196 ( 3196 )</td><td>-3468 ( 3468 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions</td><td>-4928 ( 4928 )</td><td>-9091 ( 9091 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other adjustments</td><td>-1213 ( 1213 )</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cet1</td><td>$ 64260</td><td>$ 58219</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basel iii advanced rwas</td><td>$ 577869</td><td>$ 594662</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>basel iii advanced cet1 ratio</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>standardized rwas</td><td>$ 627444</td><td>$ 635092</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>standardized cet1 ratio</td><td>10.2% ( 10.2 % )</td><td>9.2% ( 9.2 % )</td></tr></table> although the fully phased-in capital ratios are not applicable until 2019 , we believe that the estimated ratios in the table above are meaningful because they are measures that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the estimated fully phased-in basel iii advanced and standardized cet1 ratios are non-gaap measures as of both december 2014 and december 2013 and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies ( as of those dates ) . these estimated ratios are based on our current interpretation , expectations and understanding of the revised capital framework and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for information about our transitional capital ratios , which represent our binding ratios as of december 2014 . in the table above : 2030 the deduction for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets , net of deferred tax liabilities , represents goodwill of $ 3.65 billion and $ 3.71 billion as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , and identifiable intangible assets of $ 515 million and $ 671 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , net of associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 964 million and $ 908 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively . 2030 the deduction for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions represents the amount by which our investments in the capital of nonconsolidated financial institutions exceed certain prescribed thresholds . the decrease from december 2013 to december 2014 primarily reflects reductions in our fund investments . 2030 other adjustments primarily include the overfunded portion of our defined benefit pension plan obligation , net of associated deferred tax liabilities , and disallowed deferred tax assets , credit valuation adjustments on derivative liabilities and debt valuation adjustments , as well as other required credit risk-based deductions . supplementary leverage ratio the revised capital framework introduces a new supplementary leverage ratio for advanced approach banking organizations . under amendments to the revised capital framework , the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies approved a final rule that implements the supplementary leverage ratio aligned with the definition of leverage established by the basel committee . the supplementary leverage ratio compares tier 1 capital to a measure of leverage exposure , defined as the sum of our quarterly average assets less certain deductions plus certain off-balance-sheet exposures , including a measure of derivatives exposures and commitments . the revised capital framework requires a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ( comprised of the minimum requirement of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) and a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) buffer ) for u.s . banks deemed to be g-sibs , effective on january 1 , 2018 . certain disclosures regarding the supplementary leverage ratio are required beginning in the first quarter of 2015 . as of december 2014 , our estimated supplementary leverage ratio was 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , including tier 1 capital on a fully phased-in basis of $ 73.17 billion ( cet1 of $ 64.26 billion plus perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock of $ 9.20 billion less other adjustments of $ 290 million ) divided by total leverage exposure of $ 1.45 trillion ( total quarterly average assets of $ 873 billion plus adjustments of $ 579 billion , primarily comprised of off-balance-sheet exposure related to derivatives and commitments ) . we believe that the estimated supplementary leverage ratio is meaningful because it is a measure that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the supplementary leverage ratio is a non-gaap measure and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies . this estimated supplementary leverage ratio is based on our current interpretation and understanding of the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies 2019 final rule and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . 60 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .\nQuestion: what was the balance of common shareholders by the end of 2014?\nAnswer: 73597.0\nQuestion: and what was it at the beginning of the year?\nAnswer: 71267.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the variation over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2330.0" } ]
CONVFINQA153	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncompared to earlier levels . the pre-tax non-cash impairments of certain mineral rights and real estate discussed above under the caption fffdland and development impairments fffd are not included in segment income . liquidity and capital resources on january 29 , 2018 , we announced that a definitive agreement had been signed for us to acquire all of the outstanding shares of kapstone for $ 35.00 per share and the assumption of approximately $ 1.36 billion in net debt , for a total enterprise value of approximately $ 4.9 billion . in contemplation of the transaction , on march 6 , 2018 , we issued $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% ( 3.75 % ) senior notes due 2025 and $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) senior notes due 2028 in an unregistered offering pursuant to rule 144a and regulation s under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the fffdsecurities act fffd ) . in addition , on march 7 , 2018 , we entered into the delayed draw credit facilities ( as hereinafter defined ) that provide for $ 3.8 billion of senior unsecured term loans . on november 2 , 2018 , in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition , we drew upon the facility in full . the proceeds of the delayed draw credit facilities ( as hereinafter defined ) and other sources of cash were used to pay the consideration for the kapstone acquisition , to repay certain existing indebtedness of kapstone and to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the kapstone acquisition . we fund our working capital requirements , capital expenditures , mergers , acquisitions and investments , restructuring activities , dividends and stock repurchases from net cash provided by operating activities , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our new a/r sales agreement ( as hereinafter defined ) , proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment removed from service and proceeds received in connection with the issuance of debt and equity securities . see fffdnote 13 . debt fffdtt of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . funding for our domestic operations in the foreseeable future is expected to come from sources of liquidity within our domestic operations , including cash and cash equivalents , and available borrowings under our credit facilities . as such , our foreign cash and cash equivalents are not expected to be a key source of liquidity to our domestic operations . at september 30 , 2018 , excluding the delayed draw credit facilities , we had approximately $ 3.2 billion of availability under our committed credit facilities , primarily under our revolving credit facility , the majority of which matures on july 1 , 2022 . this liquidity may be used to provide for ongoing working capital needs and for other general corporate purposes , including acquisitions , dividends and stock repurchases . certain restrictive covenants govern our maximum availability under the credit facilities . we test and report our compliance with these covenants as required and we were in compliance with all of these covenants at september 30 , 2018 . at september 30 , 2018 , we had $ 104.9 million of outstanding letters of credit not drawn cash and cash equivalents were $ 636.8 million at september 30 , 2018 and $ 298.1 million at september 30 , 2017 . we used a significant portion of the cash and cash equivalents on hand at september 30 , 2018 in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition . approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of the cash and cash equivalents at september 30 , 2018 were held outside of the u.s . at september 30 , 2018 , total debt was $ 6415.2 million , $ 740.7 million of which was current . at september 30 , 2017 , total debt was $ 6554.8 million , $ 608.7 million of which was current . cash flow activityy . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2018</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2017</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2420.9</td><td>$ 1900.5</td><td>$ 1688.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>$ -1298.9 ( 1298.9 )</td><td>$ -1285.8 ( 1285.8 )</td><td>$ -1351.4 ( 1351.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>$ -755.1 ( 755.1 )</td><td>$ -655.4 ( 655.4 )</td><td>$ -231.0 ( 231.0 )</td></tr></table> net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2018 increased $ 520.4 million from fiscal 2017 primarily due to higher cash earnings and lower cash taxes due to the impact of the tax act . net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2017 increased $ 212.1 million from fiscal 2016 primarily due to a $ 111.6 million net increase in cash flow from working capital changes plus higher after-tax cash proceeds from our land and development segment fffds accelerated monetization . the changes in working capital in fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included a .\nQuestion: in the year of 2018, what was the total net cash used?\nAnswer: 2054.0\nQuestion: and what was the total net cash provided?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2420.9" } ]
CONVFINQA6287	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninstitutions . international paper continually monitors its positions with and the credit quality of these financial institutions and does not expect non- performance by the counterparties . note 14 capital stock the authorized capital stock at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , consisted of 990850000 shares of common stock , $ 1 par value ; 400000 shares of cumulative $ 4 preferred stock , without par value ( stated value $ 100 per share ) ; and 8750000 shares of serial preferred stock , $ 1 par value . the serial preferred stock is issuable in one or more series by the board of directors without further shareholder action . in july 2006 , in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the company 2019s trans- formation plan , international paper 2019s board of direc- tors authorized a share repurchase program to acquire up to $ 3.0 billion of the company 2019s stock . in a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer completed in september 2006 , international paper purchased 38465260 shares of its common stock at a price of $ 36.00 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 1.4 billion . in addition , in december 2006 , the company purchased an addi- tional 1220558 shares of its common stock in the open market at an average price of $ 33.84 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 41 million . following the completion of these share repurchases , international paper had approximately 454 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding . note 15 retirement plans u.s . defined benefit plans international paper maintains pension plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially all domestic employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 . these employees generally are eligible to participate in the plans upon completion of one year of service and attainment of age 21 . employees hired after june 30 , 2004 , who are not eligible for these pension plans receive an additional company contribution to their savings plan ( see 201cother plans 201d on page 83 ) . the plans provide defined benefits based on years of credited service and either final average earnings ( salaried employees ) , hourly job rates or specified benefit rates ( hourly and union employees ) . for its qualified defined benefit pension plan , interna- tional paper makes contributions that are sufficient to fully fund its actuarially determined costs , gen- erally equal to the minimum amounts required by the employee retirement income security act ( erisa ) . in addition , international paper made volun- tary contributions of $ 1.0 billion to the qualified defined benefit plan in 2006 , and does not expect to make any contributions in 2007 . the company also has two unfunded nonqualified defined benefit pension plans : a pension restoration plan available to employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 that provides retirement benefits based on eligible compensation in excess of limits set by the internal revenue service , and a supplemental retirement plan for senior managers ( serp ) , which is an alternative retirement plan for senior vice presi- dents and above who are designated by the chief executive officer as participants . these nonqualified plans are only funded to the extent of benefits paid , which are expected to be $ 41 million in 2007 . net periodic pension expense service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the plans 2019 benefit formula to services rendered by employees during the year . interest cost represents the increase in the projected benefit obli- gation , which is a discounted amount , due to the passage of time . the expected return on plan assets reflects the computed amount of current year earn- ings from the investment of plan assets using an estimated long-term rate of return . net periodic pension expense for qualified and nonqualified u.s . defined benefit plans comprised the following : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>506</td><td>474</td><td>467</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-540 ( 540 )</td><td>-556 ( 556 )</td><td>-592 ( 592 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>actuarial loss</td><td>243</td><td>167</td><td>94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of prior service cost</td><td>27</td><td>29</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net periodic pension expense ( a )</td><td>$ 377</td><td>$ 243</td><td>$ 111</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 9.1 million , $ 6.5 million and $ 3.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 8.7 million , $ 3.6 million and $ 1.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , of termination benefits , in connection with cost reduction programs and facility rationalizations that were recorded in restructuring and other charges in the con- solidated statement of operations . also excludes $ 77.2 million and $ 14.3 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 18.6 million and $ 7.6 million of termination bene- fits in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , related to certain divest- itures recorded in net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the consolidated statement of oper- ations. .\nQuestion: what is the net periodic pension expense in 2005?\nAnswer: 243.0\nQuestion: what about in 2004?\nAnswer: 111.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 132.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 1.18919\nQuestion: what about the net change from 2005 to 2006?\nAnswer: 134.0\nQuestion: what percent change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.55144" } ]
CONVFINQA5655	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 8 . acquisitions during fiscal 2017 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 142.8 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 4.2 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 76.4 million of acquired intangible assets ( of which $ 71.5 million represents in-process technology ) , $ 90.2 million of goodwill and $ 19.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred tax liabilities . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other performance-based conditions , through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 . during fiscal 2016 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 42.4 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 1.8 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 23.6 million of goodwill , $ 23.2 million of acquired intangible assets and $ 2.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred revenue . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other conditions , through the second quarter of fiscal a trust for the benefit of the children of lip-bu tan , cadence 2019s chief executive officer ( 201cceo 201d ) and director , owned less than 3% ( 3 % ) of nusemi inc , one of the companies acquired in 2017 , and less than 2% ( 2 % ) of rocketick technologies ltd. , one of the companies acquired in 2016 . mr . tan and his wife serve as co-trustees of the trust and disclaim pecuniary and economic interest in the trust . the board of directors of cadence reviewed the transactions and concluded that it was in the best interests of cadence to proceed with the transactions . mr . tan recused himself from the board of directors 2019 discussion of the valuation of nusemi inc and rocketick technologies ltd . and on whether to proceed with the transactions . acquisition-related transaction costs there were no direct transaction costs associated with acquisitions during fiscal 2018 . transaction costs associated with acquisitions were $ 0.6 million and $ 1.1 million during fiscal 2017 and 2016 , respectively . these costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in cadence 2019s consolidated income statements . note 9 . goodwill and acquired intangibles goodwill the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2018 and 2017 were as follows : gross carrying amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>gross carryingamount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2016</td><td>$ 572764</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill resulting from acquisitions</td><td>90218</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>3027</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 30 2017</td><td>666009</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>-3737 ( 3737 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 29 2018</td><td>$ 662272</td></tr></table> cadence completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of fiscal 2018 and determined that the fair value of cadence 2019s single reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount of its net assets and that no impairment existed. .\nQuestion: what was the goodwill balance at the end of 2017?\nAnswer: 666009.0\nQuestion: what was the goodwill balance at the end of 2016?\nAnswer: 572764.0\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "93245.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5720	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbaker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements bhge 2017 form 10-k \| 85 the total intrinsic value of rsus ( defined as the value of the shares awarded at the current market price ) vested and outstanding in 2017 was $ 17 million and $ 38 million , respectively . the total fair value of rsus vested in 2017 was $ 19 million . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was $ 98 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested rsus , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years . note 12 . equity common stock we are authorized to issue 2 billion shares of class a common stock , 1.25 billion shares of class b common stock and 50 million shares of preferred stock each of which have a par value of $ 0.0001 per share . on july 3 , 2017 , each share of baker hughes common stock was converted into one share of class a common stock in the company . the number of class a common stock and class b common stock shares outstanding at december 31 , 2017 is 422 million and 707 million , respectively . we have not issued any preferred stock . ge owns all the issued and outstanding class b common stock . each share of class a and class b common stock and the associated membership interest in bhge llc form a paired interest . while each share of class b common stock has equal voting rights to a share of class a common stock , it has no economic rights , meaning holders of class b common stock have no right to dividends and any assets in the event of liquidation of the company . former baker hughes stockholders immediately after the completion of the transactions received a special one-time cash dividend of $ 17.50 per share paid by the company to holders of record of the company's class a common stock . in addition , during 2017 the company declared and paid regular dividends of $ 0.17 per share and $ 0.18 per share to holders of record of the company's class a common stock during the quarters ended september 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively . the following table presents the changes in number of shares outstanding ( in thousands ) : class a common class b common . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>class a common stock</td><td>class b common stock</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2016</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issue of shares on business combination at july 3 2017</td><td>427709</td><td>717111</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>issue of shares upon vesting of restricted stock units ( 1 )</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>issue of shares on exercises of stock options ( 1 )</td><td>256</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock repurchase program ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>-6047 ( 6047 )</td><td>-10126 ( 10126 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2017</td><td>422208</td><td>706985</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) share amounts reflected above are net of shares withheld to satisfy the employee's tax withholding obligation . ( 2 ) on november 2 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized bhge llc to repurchase up to $ 3 billion of its common units from the company and ge . the proceeds of this repurchase are to be used by bhge to repurchase class a common stock of the company on the open market , which if fully implemented would result in the repurchase of approximately $ 1.1 billion of class a common stock . the class b common stock of the company , that is paired with repurchased common units , was repurchased by the company at par value . the $ 3 billion repurchase authorization is the aggregate authorization for repurchases of class a and class b common stock together with its paired unit . bhge llc had authorization remaining to repurchase up to approximately $ 2.5 billion of its common units from bhge and ge at december 31 , 2017 . ( 3 ) during 2017 , we repurchased and canceled 6046735 shares of class a common stock for a total of $ 187 million . we also repurchased and canceled 10126467 shares of class b common stock from ge which is paired together with common units of bhge llc for $ 314 million. .\nQuestion: how many billion shares of class a common stock are authorized?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3959	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naverage revenue per car 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>average revenue per car</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 3286</td><td>$ 3080</td><td>$ 3352</td><td>7% ( 7 % )</td><td>( 8 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>2082</td><td>1838</td><td>2017</td><td>13</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2874</td><td>2761</td><td>2818</td><td>4</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy</td><td>1697</td><td>1543</td><td>1622</td><td>10</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>2461</td><td>2388</td><td>2620</td><td>3</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>974</td><td>896</td><td>955</td><td>9</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average</td><td>$ 1823</td><td>$ 1718</td><td>$ 1848</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>( 7 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> agricultural products 2013 higher volume , fuel surcharges , and price improvements increased agricultural freight revenue in 2010 versus 2009 . increased shipments from the midwest to export ports in the pacific northwest combined with heightened demand in mexico drove higher corn and feed grain shipments in 2010 . increased corn and feed grain shipments into ethanol plants in california and idaho and continued growth in ethanol shipments also contributed to this increase . in 2009 , some ethanol plants temporarily ceased operations due to lower ethanol margins , which contributed to the favorable year-over-year comparison . in addition , strong export demand for u.s . wheat via the gulf ports increased shipments of wheat and food grains compared to 2009 . declines in domestic wheat and food shipments partially offset the growth in export shipments . new business in feed and animal protein shipments also increased agricultural shipments in 2010 compared to 2009 . lower volume and fuel surcharges decreased agricultural freight revenue in 2009 versus 2008 . price improvements partially offset these declines . lower demand in both export and domestic markets led to fewer shipments of corn and feed grains , down 11% ( 11 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . weaker worldwide demand also reduced export shipments of wheat and food grains in 2009 versus 2008 . automotive 2013 37% ( 37 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) increases in shipments of finished vehicles and automotive parts in 2010 , respectively , combined with core pricing gains and fuel surcharges , improved automotive freight revenue from relatively weak 2009 levels . economic conditions in 2009 led to poor auto sales and reduced vehicle production , which in turn reduced shipments of finished vehicles and parts during the declines in shipments of finished vehicles and auto parts and lower fuel surcharges reduced freight revenue in 2009 compared to 2008 . vehicle shipments were down 35% ( 35 % ) and parts were down 24% ( 24 % ) . core pricing gains partially offset these declines . these volume declines resulted from economic conditions that reduced sales and vehicle production . in addition , two major domestic automotive manufacturers declared bankruptcy in the second quarter of 2009 , affecting production levels . although the federal car allowance rebate system ( the 201ccash for clunkers 201d program ) helped stimulate vehicle sales and shipments in the third quarter of 2009 , production cuts and soft demand throughout the year more than offset the program 2019s benefits . 2010 agricultural revenue 2010 automotive revenue .\nQuestion: what is the sum of revenue in agriculture in 2009 and 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6366.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10077	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2017 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................... . 39 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2017 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 )</td><td>27</td></tr></table> infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................ . 27 ______________________________ ( 1 ) see note 29 - subsequent events in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . amcel ae , aoplus ae , ateva ae , avicor ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx ae , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , dur- o-set ae , ecomid ae , ecovae ae , forflex ae , forprene ae , frianyl ae , fortron ae , ghr ae , gumfit ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , laprene ae , metalx ae , mowilith ae , mt ae , nilamid ae , nivionplast ae , nutrinova ae , nylfor ae , pibiflex ae , pibifor ae , pibiter ae , polifor ae , resyn ae , riteflex ae , slidex ae , sofprene ae , sofpur ae , sunett ae , talcoprene ae , tecnoprene ae , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vectra ae , vinac ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc . hostaform ae is a registered trademark of hoechst gmbh . mowilith ae and nilamid ae are registered trademarks of celanese in most european countries . we monitor competitive developments and defend against infringements on our intellectual property rights . neither celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent , trademark , copyright or trade secret . environmental and other regulation matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed in item 1a . risk factors , as well as note 2 - summary of accounting policies , note 16 - environmental and note 24 - commitments and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. .\nQuestion: what is the r&d expense from 2016 to 2017?\nAnswer: 150.0\nQuestion: what us the r&d expense in 2015?\nAnswer: 119.0\nQuestion: what is the total for three years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "269.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3720	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 192.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>42.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>25.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-41.2 ( 41.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr></table> the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. .\nQuestion: what is the number of electric consumers in 2007?\nAnswer: 132000.0\nQuestion: what about in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "95000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4491	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/07</td><td>12/08</td><td>12/09</td><td>12/10</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity national information services inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>70.08</td><td>101.93</td><td>120.01</td><td>117.34</td><td>157.38</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>63.00</td><td>79.67</td><td>91.67</td><td>93.61</td><td>108.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services</td><td>100.00</td><td>68.26</td><td>99.41</td><td>97.33</td><td>118.68</td><td>151.90</td></tr></table> s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( \"metavante\" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( \"lps\" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .\nQuestion: what is the value of fidelity national in 2008?\nAnswer: 70.08\nQuestion: what is the value of fidelity in 2008 less an assumed $100 initial investment?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-29.92" } ]
CONVFINQA9643	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncontractual obligations . the following table shows our contractual obligations for the period indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period less than 1 year</td><td>payments due by period 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>8.75% ( 8.75 % ) senior notes</td><td>$ 200.0</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 200.0</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>5.40% ( 5.40 % ) senior notes</td><td>250.0</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>250.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>junior subordinated debt</td><td>329.9</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>329.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>6.6% ( 6.6 % ) long term notes</td><td>400.0</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>400.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>interest expense ( 1 )</td><td>2243.0</td><td>77.2</td><td>145.7</td><td>119.5</td><td>1900.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>employee benefit plans</td><td>2.4</td><td>2.4</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>operating lease agreements</td><td>32.0</td><td>8.5</td><td>16.3</td><td>3.7</td><td>3.5</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>gross reserve for losses and lae ( 2 )</td><td>9040.6</td><td>2053.2</td><td>3232.3</td><td>1077.1</td><td>2678.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 12497.9</td><td>$ 2141.3</td><td>$ 3594.3</td><td>$ 1200.3</td><td>$ 5562.0</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) interest expense on 6.6% ( 6.6 % ) long term notes is assumed to be fixed through contractual term . ( 2 ) loss and lae reserves represent our best estimate of losses from claim and related settlement costs . both the amounts and timing of such payments are estimates , and the inherent variability of resolving claims as well as changes in market conditions make the timing of cash flows uncertain . therefore , the ultimate amount and timing of loss and lae payments could differ from our estimates . the contractual obligations for senior notes , long term notes and junior subordinated debt are the responsibility of holdings . we have sufficient cash flow , liquidity , investments and access to capital markets to satisfy these obligations . holdings gen- erally depends upon dividends from everest re , its operating insurance subsidiary for its funding , capital contributions from group or access to the capital markets . our various operating insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have sufficient cash flow , liquidity and investments to settle outstanding reserves for losses and lae . management believes that we , and each of our entities , have sufficient financial resources or ready access thereto , to meet all obligations . dividends . during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , we declared and paid shareholder dividends of $ 121.4 million , $ 39.0 million and $ 25.4 million , respectively . as an insurance holding company , we are partially dependent on dividends and other permitted pay- ments from our subsidiaries to pay cash dividends to our shareholders . the payment of dividends to group by holdings and to holdings by everest re is subject to delaware regulatory restrictions and the payment of dividends to group by bermuda re is subject to bermuda insurance regulatory restrictions . management expects that , absent extraordinary catastrophe losses , such restrictions should not affect everest re 2019s ability to declare and pay dividends sufficient to support holdings 2019 general corporate needs and that holdings and bermuda re will have the ability to declare and pay dividends sufficient to support group 2019s general corporate needs . for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , everest re paid divi- dends to holdings of $ 245.0 million , $ 100.0 million and $ 75.0 million , respectively . for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , bermuda re paid dividends to group of $ 0.0 million , $ 60.0 million and $ 45.0 million , respectively . see item 1 , 201cbusiness 2013 regulatory matters 2013 dividends 201d and note 16 of notes to consolidated financial statements . application of new accounting standards . in november 2005 , the fasb issued fasb staff position ( 201cfsp 201d ) fas 115-1 , 201cthe meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to certain investments 201d ( 201cfas 115-1 201d ) , which is effective for reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2005 . fas 115-1 addresses the determination as to when an investment is considered impaired , whether the impairment is other than temporary and the measurement of an impairment loss . fas 115-1 also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain dis- closures about unrealized losses not recognized as other-than-temporary impairments . the company adopted fas 115-1 prospectively effective january 1 , 2006 . the company believes that all unrealized losses in its investment portfolio are temporary in nature. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in paid shareholder dividends between 2006 and 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "82.4" } ]
CONVFINQA6399	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwhich , $ 44.9 million , or $ 38.2 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to earnings over the next twelve months . we also enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with terms of one month to manage currency exposures for assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than an entity 2019s functional currency . as a result , any foreign currency translation gains/losses recognized in earnings under sfas no . 52 , 201cforeign currency translation 201d are generally offset with gains/losses on the foreign currency forward exchange contracts in the same reporting period . other comprehensive income 2013 other comprehensive income refers to revenues , expenses , gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . other comprehensive income is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , unrealized foreign currency hedge gains and losses , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions . the components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows ( in millions ) : balance at december 31 , comprehensive income ( loss ) balance at december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>other comprehensive income ( loss )</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>$ 267.7</td><td>$ 101.1</td><td>$ 368.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency hedges</td><td>-22.6 ( 22.6 )</td><td>-22.8 ( 22.8 )</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized gains ( losses ) on securities</td><td>-0.5 ( 0.5 )</td><td>-1.4 ( 1.4 )</td><td>-1.9 ( 1.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unrecognized prior service cost and unrecognized ( gain ) / loss in actuarial assumptions</td><td>-35.4 ( 35.4 )</td><td>4.2</td><td>-31.2 ( 31.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive income</td><td>$ 209.2</td><td>$ 81.1</td><td>$ 290.3</td></tr></table> treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of shareholders equity . we may reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes . accounting pronouncements 2013 in june 2006 , the fasb issued interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , an interpretation of fas 109 , accounting for income taxes 201d ( fin 48 ) , to create a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in tax positions . see our income tax disclosures in note 11 for more information regarding the adoption of fin 48 . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans 2013 an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) . 201d this statement requires recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan in the statement of financial position . sfas no . 158 also requires recognition in other comprehensive income of certain gains and losses that arise during the period but are deferred under pension accounting rules , as well as modifies the timing of reporting and adds certain disclosures . the statement provides recognition and disclosure elements to be effective as of the end of the fiscal year after december 15 , 2006 and measurement elements to be effective for fiscal years ending after december 15 , 2008 . we adopted sfas no . 158 on december 31 , 2006 . see our pension and other postretirement disclosures in note 10 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123 ( r ) , 201cshare-based payment 201d , which is a revision to sfas no . 123 . sfas 123 ( r ) requires all share-based payments to employees , including stock options , to be expensed based on their fair values . we adopted sfas 123 ( r ) on january 1 , 2006 using the modified prospective method and did not restate prior periods . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , 201cfair value measurements 201d , which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . this statement does not require any new fair value measurements , but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information . sfas no . 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years . in february 2008 , the fasb issued fasb staff position ( fsp ) no . sfas 157-2 , which delays the effective date of certain provisions of sfas no . 157 relating to non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis until fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2008 . the adoption of sfas no . 157 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . in february 2007 , the fasb issued sfas no . 159 , 201cthe fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities 2013 including an amendment of fasb statement no . 115 201d ( sfas no . 159 ) . sfas no . 159 creates a 201cfair value option 201d under which an entity may elect to record certain financial assets or liabilities at fair value upon their initial recognition . subsequent changes in fair value would be recognized in earnings as those changes occur . the election of the fair value option would be made on a contract-by-contract basis and would need to be supported by concurrent documentation or a preexisting documented policy . sfas no . 159 requires an entity to separately disclose the fair z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 7 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what percentage did the variation of the accumulated other comprehensive income from 2006 to 2007 represent in relation to the total balance in 2006?\nAnswer: 0.38767\nQuestion: and from that total balance in 2007, what was the total of foreign currency hedges?\nAnswer: 45.4\nQuestion: and what was the foreign currency translation amount?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "368.8" } ]
CONVFINQA7140	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n28 , 35 , or 90 days . the funds associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs or a buyer is found outside of the auction process . based on broker- dealer valuation models and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment factors , auction rate securities with an original par value of approximately $ 34 million were written-down to an estimated fair value of $ 16 million as of december 31 , 2007 . this write-down resulted in an 201cother-than-temporary 201d impairment charge of approximately $ 8 million ( pre-tax ) included in net income and a temporary impairment charge of $ 10 million ( pre-tax ) reflected as an unrealized loss within other comprehensive income for 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , these investments in auction rate securities have been in a loss position for less than six months . these auction rate securities are classified as non-current marketable securities as of december 31 , 2007 as indicated in the preceding table . 3m reviews impairments associated with the above in accordance with emerging issues task force ( eitf ) 03-1 and fsp sfas 115-1 and 124-1 , 201cthe meaning of other-than-temporary-impairment and its application to certain investments , 201d to determine the classification of the impairment as 201ctemporary 201d or 201cother-than-temporary . 201d a temporary impairment charge results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive income component of stockholders 2019 equity . such an unrealized loss does not reduce net income for the applicable accounting period because the loss is not viewed as other-than-temporary . the company believes that a portion of the impairment of its auction rate securities investments is temporary and a portion is other-than-temporary . the factors evaluated to differentiate between temporary and other-than-temporary include the projected future cash flows , credit ratings actions , and assessment of the credit quality of the underlying collateral . the balance at december 31 , 2007 for marketable securities and short-term investments by contractual maturity are shown below . actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties . dec . 31 , ( millions ) 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>dec . 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>due in one year or less</td><td>$ 231</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>due after one year through three years</td><td>545</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>due after three years through five years</td><td>221</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>due after five years</td><td>62</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total marketable securities</td><td>$ 1059</td></tr></table> predetermined intervals , usually every 7 .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2007, what was the impact of the adjustement on the auction rate securities?\nAnswer: 18.0\nQuestion: and what is this impact as a portion of those original securities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.52941" } ]
CONVFINQA9294	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nexcept for long-term debt , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s other financial instruments are measured at fair value or approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments . asset retirement obligations 2014the company records all known asset retirement obligations within other current liabilities for which the liability 2019s fair value can be reasonably estimated , including certain asbestos removal , asset decommissioning and contractual lease restoration obligations . the changes in the asset retirement obligation carrying amounts during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 were as follows : ( $ in millions ) retirement obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>asset retirement obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2009</td><td>$ 3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 25</td></tr></table> the company also has known conditional asset retirement obligations related to assets currently in use , such as certain asbestos remediation and asset decommissioning activities to be performed in the future , that were not reasonably estimable as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , due to insufficient information about the timing and method of settlement of the obligation . accordingly , the fair value of these obligations has not been recorded in the consolidated financial statements . environmental remediation and/or asset decommissioning of the relevant facilities may be required when the company ceases to utilize these facilities . in addition , there may be conditional environmental asset retirement obligations that the company has not yet discovered . income taxes 2014income tax expense and other income tax related information contained in the financial statements for periods before the spin-off are presented as if the company filed its own tax returns on a stand-alone basis , while similar information for periods after the spin-off reflect the company 2019s positions to be filed in its own tax returns in the future . income tax expense and other related information are based on the prevailing statutory rates for u.s . federal income taxes and the composite state income tax rate for the company for each period presented . state and local income and franchise tax provisions are allocable to contracts in process and , accordingly , are included in general and administrative expenses . deferred income taxes are recorded when revenues and expenses are recognized in different periods for financial statement purposes than for tax return purposes . deferred tax asset or liability account balances are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect . determinations of the expected realizability of deferred tax assets and the need for any valuation allowances against these deferred tax assets were evaluated based upon the stand-alone tax attributes of the company , and an $ 18 million valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2011 . no valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2010 . uncertain tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold , based on the merits of the position , are recognized in the financial statements . we recognize the amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% ( 50 % ) likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority . if a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties , we recognize an expense for the amount of the penalty in the period the tax position is claimed or expected to be claimed in our tax return . penalties , if probable and reasonably estimable , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . we also recognize accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense . the timing and amount of accrued interest is determined by the applicable tax law associated with an underpayment of income taxes . see note 12 : income taxes . under existing gaap , changes in accruals associated with uncertainties are recorded in earnings in the period they are determined. .\nQuestion: what is the total accretion expense of 2011 and 2010?\nAnswer: 0.0\nQuestion: then what is the total accretion expense if we also include 2009?\nAnswer: 0.0\nQuestion: what is the balance at december 31 2011?\nAnswer: 25.0\nQuestion: what is the balance at january 1 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8722	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2 0 0 8 a n n u a l r e p o r t stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the performance of our series a common , series b common stock , and series c common stock for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 as compared with the performance of the standard and poor 2019s 500 index and a peer group index which consists of the walt disney company , time warner inc. , cbs corporation class b common stock , viacom , inc . class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , and scripps network interactive , inc . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares . september 18 , september 30 , december 31 , 2008 2008 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 18 2008</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.19</td><td>$ 102.53</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 105.54</td><td>$ 78.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 88.50</td><td>$ 83.69</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 96.54</td><td>$ 74.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 92.67</td><td>$ 68.79</td></tr></table> s&p 500 peer group .\nQuestion: from september 30 to december 31 of 2008, what was the decline in the performance price of the s&p 500?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "21.68" } ]
CONVFINQA3400	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1130.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>17.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fuel write-offs in 2002</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>base rate decreases</td><td>-23.3 ( 23.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nisco gain recognized in 2002</td><td>-15.2 ( 15.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rate refund provisions</td><td>-11.3 ( 11.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-14.1 ( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .\nQuestion: what was the percentage of deferred fuel costs out of total fuel write-offs in 2002?\nAnswer: 0.5817\nQuestion: what was the change in net revenue during 2003 for entergy gulf states?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-20.6" } ]
CONVFINQA1282	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwestrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 20 . stockholders 2019 equity capitalization our capital stock consists solely of common stock . holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share . our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also authorizes preferred stock , of which no shares have been issued . the terms and provisions of such shares will be determined by our board of directors upon any issuance of such shares in accordance with our certificate of incorporation . stock repurchase plan in july 2015 , our board of directors authorized a repurchase program of up to 40.0 million shares of our common stock , representing approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding common stock as of july 1 , 2015 . the shares of our common stock may be repurchased over an indefinite period of time at the discretion of management . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . in fiscal 2017 , we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 93.0 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had remaining authorization under the repurchase program authorized in july 2015 to purchase approximately 19.1 million shares of our common stock . note 21 . share-based compensation share-based compensation plans at our annual meeting of stockholders held on february 2 , 2016 , our stockholders approved the westrock company 2016 incentive stock plan . the 2016 incentive stock plan was amended and restated on february 2 , 2018 ( the 201camended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan 201d ) . the amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan allows for the granting of options , restricted stock , sars and restricted stock units to certain key employees and directors . the table below shows the approximate number of shares : available for issuance , available for future grant , to be issued if restricted awards granted with a performance condition recorded at target achieve the maximum award , and if new grants pursuant to the plan are expected to be issued , each as adjusted as necessary for corporate actions ( in millions ) . shares available issuance shares available for future shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum expect to awards amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) 11.7 5.1 2.3 yes 2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 15.8 3.1 0.0 no 2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 12.8 9.0 0.0 no rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 ) 7.9 5.9 0.0 no ( 1 ) as part of the separation , equity-based incentive awards were generally adjusted to maintain the intrinsic value of awards immediately prior to the separation . the number of unvested restricted stock awards and unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation were increased by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . in addition , the exercise price of unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation was converted to decrease the exercise price by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . ( 2 ) in connection with the combination , westrock assumed all rocktenn and mwv equity incentive plans . we issued awards to certain key employees and our directors pursuant to our rocktenn 2004 incentive stock plan , as amended , and our mwv 2005 performance incentive plan , as amended . the awards were converted into westrock awards using the conversion factor as described in the business combination agreement . ( 3 ) in connection with the smurfit-stone acquisition , we assumed the smurfit-stone equity incentive plan , which was renamed the rock-tenn company ( sscc ) equity incentive plan . the awards were converted into shares of rocktenn common stock , options and restricted stock units , as applicable , using the conversion factor as described in the merger agreement. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares available for issuance</td><td>shares available for future grant</td><td>shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum</td><td>expect to make new awards</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 )</td><td>11.7</td><td>5.1</td><td>2.3</td><td>yes</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 )</td><td>15.8</td><td>3.1</td><td>0.0</td><td>no</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 )</td><td>12.8</td><td>9.0</td><td>0.0</td><td>no</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 )</td><td>7.9</td><td>5.9</td><td>0.0</td><td>no</td></tr></table> westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 20 . stockholders 2019 equity capitalization our capital stock consists solely of common stock . holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share . our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also authorizes preferred stock , of which no shares have been issued . the terms and provisions of such shares will be determined by our board of directors upon any issuance of such shares in accordance with our certificate of incorporation . stock repurchase plan in july 2015 , our board of directors authorized a repurchase program of up to 40.0 million shares of our common stock , representing approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding common stock as of july 1 , 2015 . the shares of our common stock may be repurchased over an indefinite period of time at the discretion of management . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . in fiscal 2017 , we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 93.0 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had remaining authorization under the repurchase program authorized in july 2015 to purchase approximately 19.1 million shares of our common stock . note 21 . share-based compensation share-based compensation plans at our annual meeting of stockholders held on february 2 , 2016 , our stockholders approved the westrock company 2016 incentive stock plan . the 2016 incentive stock plan was amended and restated on february 2 , 2018 ( the 201camended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan 201d ) . the amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan allows for the granting of options , restricted stock , sars and restricted stock units to certain key employees and directors . the table below shows the approximate number of shares : available for issuance , available for future grant , to be issued if restricted awards granted with a performance condition recorded at target achieve the maximum award , and if new grants pursuant to the plan are expected to be issued , each as adjusted as necessary for corporate actions ( in millions ) . shares available issuance shares available for future shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum expect to awards amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) 11.7 5.1 2.3 yes 2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 15.8 3.1 0.0 no 2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 12.8 9.0 0.0 no rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 ) 7.9 5.9 0.0 no ( 1 ) as part of the separation , equity-based incentive awards were generally adjusted to maintain the intrinsic value of awards immediately prior to the separation . the number of unvested restricted stock awards and unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation were increased by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . in addition , the exercise price of unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation was converted to decrease the exercise price by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . ( 2 ) in connection with the combination , westrock assumed all rocktenn and mwv equity incentive plans . we issued awards to certain key employees and our directors pursuant to our rocktenn 2004 incentive stock plan , as amended , and our mwv 2005 performance incentive plan , as amended . the awards were converted into westrock awards using the conversion factor as described in the business combination agreement . ( 3 ) in connection with the smurfit-stone acquisition , we assumed the smurfit-stone equity incentive plan , which was renamed the rock-tenn company ( sscc ) equity incentive plan . the awards were converted into shares of rocktenn common stock , options and restricted stock units , as applicable , using the conversion factor as described in the merger agreement. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the number of shares repurchased in 2018 and 2019?\nAnswer: 5.5\nQuestion: what is the number of repurchases in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.8" } ]
CONVFINQA7020	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i item 1 . business our company founded in 1886 , american water works company , inc. , ( the 201ccompany , 201d 201camerican water 201d or 201caww 201d ) is a delaware holding company . american water is the most geographically diversified , as well as the largest publicly-traded , united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured by both operating revenues and population served . as a holding company , we conduct substantially all of our business operations through our subsidiaries . our approximately 6400 employees provide an estimated 15 million people with drinking water , wastewater and/or other water-related services in 47 states and one canadian province . operating segments we report our results of operations in two operating segments : the regulated businesses and the market- based operations . additional information with respect to our operating segment results is included in the section entitled 201citem 7 2014management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , 201d and note 18 of the consolidated financial statements . regulated businesses our primary business involves the ownership of subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater utility services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers , including sale for resale and public authority customers . we report the results of this business in our regulated businesses segment . our subsidiaries that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by certain state commissions or other entities engaged in economic regulation , hereafter referred to as public utility commissions , or 201cpucs , 201d of the states in which we operate . the federal and state governments also regulate environmental , health and safety , and water quality matters . our regulated businesses segment operating revenues were $ 2674.3 million for 2014 , $ 2539.9 for 2013 , $ 2564.4 million for 2012 , accounting for 88.8% ( 88.8 % ) , 90.1% ( 90.1 % ) and 89.9% ( 89.9 % ) , respectively , of total operating revenues for the same periods . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenues , number of customers and an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2014 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operatingrevenues ( in millions ) $ 652.3</td><td>% ( % ) of total 24.5% ( 24.5 % )</td><td>number ofcustomers 648066</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.2% ( 20.2 % )</td><td>estimatedpopulationserved ( in millions ) 2.7</td><td>% ( % ) of total 22.7% ( 22.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>605.4</td><td>22.6% ( 22.6 % )</td><td>666415</td><td>20.7% ( 20.7 % )</td><td>2.2</td><td>18.5% ( 18.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>missouri</td><td>270.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td><td>464498</td><td>14.4% ( 14.4 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>262.3</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>312017</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>california</td><td>209.8</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>174198</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>indiana</td><td>200.6</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>293666</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>127.0</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>170371</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2327.6</td><td>87.0% ( 87.0 % )</td><td>2729231</td><td>84.8% ( 84.8 % )</td><td>10.1</td><td>84.9% ( 84.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>346.7</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>489961</td><td>15.2% ( 15.2 % )</td><td>1.8</td><td>15.1% ( 15.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2674.3</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3219192</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>11.9</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2014, what was the total estimated population served?\nAnswer: 11900000.0\nQuestion: and how much was the total number of customers as a percentage of this total amount?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.27052" } ]
CONVFINQA3042	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n22 general mills 2014 annual report 23 gross margin declined 1 percent in fiscal 2014 versus fiscal 2013 . gross margin as a percent of net sales of 36 percent was relatively flat compared to fiscal 2013 . selling , general and administrative ( sg&a ) expenses decreased $ 78 million in fiscal 2014 versus fiscal 2013 . the decrease in sg&a expenses was primarily driven by a 3 percent decrease in advertising and media expense , a smaller contribution to the general mills foundation , a decrease in incentive compensation expense and lower pension expense compared to fiscal 2013 . in fiscal 2014 , we recorded a $ 39 million charge related to venezuela currency devaluation compared to a $ 9 million charge in fiscal 2013 . in addition , we recorded $ 12 million of inte- gration costs in fiscal 2013 related to our acquisition of yoki . sg&a expenses as a percent of net sales decreased 1 percent compared to fiscal 2013 . restructuring , impairment , and other exit costs totaled $ 4 million in fiscal 2014 . the restructuring charge related to a productivity and cost savings plan approved in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 . these restructuring actions were completed in fiscal 2014 . in fiscal 2014 , we paid $ 22 million in cash related to restructuring actions . during fiscal 2014 , we recorded a divestiture gain of $ 66 million related to the sale of certain grain elevators in our u.s . retail segment . there were no divestitures in fiscal 2013 . interest , net for fiscal 2014 totaled $ 302 million , $ 15 million lower than fiscal 2013 . the average interest rate decreased 41 basis points , including the effect of the mix of debt , generating a $ 31 million decrease in net interest . average interest bearing instruments increased $ 367 million , generating a $ 16 million increase in net interest . our consolidated effective tax rate for fiscal 2014 was 33.3 percent compared to 29.2 percent in fiscal 2013 . the 4.1 percentage point increase was primarily related to the restructuring of our general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) subsidiary during the first quarter of 2013 which resulted in a $ 63 million decrease to deferred income tax liabilities related to the tax basis of the investment in gmc and certain distributed assets , with a correspond- ing non-cash reduction to income taxes . during fiscal 2013 , we also recorded a $ 34 million discrete decrease in income tax expense and an increase in our deferred tax assets related to certain actions taken to restore part of the tax benefits associated with medicare part d subsidies which had previously been reduced in fiscal 2010 with the enactment of the patient protection and affordable care act , as amended by the health care and education reconciliation act of 2010 . our fiscal 2013 tax expense also includes a $ 12 million charge associated with the liquidation of a corporate investment . after-tax earnings from joint ventures for fiscal 2014 decreased to $ 90 million compared to $ 99 million in fiscal 2013 primarily driven by increased consumer spending at cereal partners worldwide ( cpw ) and unfavorable foreign currency exchange from h e4agen- dazs japan , inc . ( hdj ) . the change in net sales for each joint venture is set forth in the following table : joint venture change in net sales as reported constant currency basis fiscal 2014 fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 vs . 2013 cpw ( 1 ) % ( % ) flat . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cpw</td><td>as reported fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 ( 1 ) % ( % )</td><td>constant currency basis fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 flat</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hdj</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>9</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>joint ventures</td><td>( 2 ) % ( % )</td><td>2</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr></table> in fiscal 2014 , cpw net sales declined by 1 percent- age point due to unfavorable foreign currency exchange . contribution from volume growth was flat compared to fiscal 2013 . in fiscal 2014 , net sales for hdj decreased 8 percentage points from fiscal 2013 as 11 percentage points of contributions from volume growth was offset by 17 percentage points of net sales decline from unfa- vorable foreign currency exchange and 2 percentage points of net sales decline attributable to unfavorable net price realization and mix . average diluted shares outstanding decreased by 20 million in fiscal 2014 from fiscal 2013 due primar- ily to the repurchase of 36 million shares , partially offset by the issuance of 7 million shares related to stock compensation plans . fiscal 2014 consolidated balance sheet analysis cash and cash equivalents increased $ 126 million from fiscal 2013 . receivables increased $ 37 million from fiscal 2013 pri- marily driven by timing of sales . inventories increased $ 14 million from fiscal 2013 . prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased $ 29 million from fiscal 2013 , mainly due to a decrease in other receivables related to the liquidation of a corporate investment . land , buildings , and equipment increased $ 64 million from fiscal 2013 , as $ 664 million of capital expenditures .\nQuestion: what was the change in earnings generated from joint ventures from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: -9.0\nQuestion: and what were those earnings in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "99.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7774	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n14 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 included $ 2024 million , net of $ 869 million of amortization , and $ 2062 million , net of $ 887 million of amortization , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the amortization for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2008 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 657</td><td>$ 188</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>614</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>580</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>465</td><td>122</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>389</td><td>152</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>3204</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5909</td><td>$ 1898</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>628</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1270</td></tr></table> the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 747 million in 2008 , $ 810 million in 2007 , and $ 798 million in 2006 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 15 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us in measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 88% ( 88 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 12% ( 12 % ) related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2008 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from .\nQuestion: what are total minimum payments for operating leases?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5909.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9691	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .\nQuestion: what is the outstanding balance on the loan in 2017?\nAnswer: 42.0\nQuestion: what about in 2016?\nAnswer: 40.0\nQuestion: what is the change in the balance of outstanding loans?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5998	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npurchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>6091605</td><td>$ 158.20</td><td>6087727</td><td>32831024</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>3408467</td><td>147.91</td><td>3402190</td><td>29428834</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>3007951</td><td>148.40</td><td>3000715</td><td>26428119</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>12508023</td><td>$ 153.04</td><td>12490632</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .\nQuestion: what was the number of shares repurchased in the last quarter of 2018?\nAnswer: 12508023.0\nQuestion: and what was the total amount of shares repurchased in that year?\nAnswer: 57669746.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, does the fourth quarter represent in relation to this total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.21689" } ]
CONVFINQA9494	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhumana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the grant-date fair value of the award will be estimated using option-pricing models . in addition , certain tax effects of stock option exercises will be reported as a financing activity rather than an operating activity in the statements of cash flows . we adopted sfas 123r on january 1 , 2006 under the retrospective transition method using the black-scholes pricing model . the effect of expensing stock options under a fair value approach using the black-scholes pricing model on diluted earnings per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 is disclosed on page 69 . in addition , the classification of cash inflows from any excess tax benefit associated with exercising stock options will change from an operating activity to a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows with no impact on total cash flows . we estimate the impact of this change in classification will decrease operating cash flows ( and increase financing cash flows ) by approximately $ 15.5 million in 2005 , $ 3.7 million in 2004 , and $ 15.2 million in 2003 . stock option expense after adopting sfas 123r is not expected to be materially different than our pro forma disclosure on page 69 and is dependent on levels of stock options granted during 2006 . 3 . acquisitions in january 2006 , our commercial segment reached an agreement to acquire cha service company , or cha health , a health plan serving employer groups in kentucky , for cash consideration of approximately $ 60.0 million plus any excess statutory surplus . this transaction , which is subject to regulatory approval , is expected to close effective in the second quarter of 2006 . on december 20 , 2005 , our commercial segment acquired corphealth , inc. , or corphealth , a behavioral health care management company , for cash consideration of approximately $ 54.2 million , including transaction costs . this acquisition allows humana to integrate coverage of medical and behavior health benefits . net tangible assets acquired of $ 6.0 million primarily consisted of cash and cash equivalents . the purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value of the net tangible assets acquired by approximately $ 48.2 million . we preliminarily allocated this excess purchase price to other intangible assets of $ 8.6 million and associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 3.2 million , and non-deductible goodwill of $ 42.8 million . the other intangible assets , which consist primarily of customer contracts , have a weighted average useful life of 14.7 years . the allocation is subject to change pending completion of the valuation by a third party valuation specialist firm assisting us in evaluating the fair value of the assets acquired . on february 16 , 2005 , our government segment acquired careplus health plans of florida , or careplus , as well as its affiliated 10 medical centers and pharmacy company . careplus provides medicare advantage hmo plans and benefits to medicare advantage members in miami-dade , broward and palm beach counties . this acquisition enhances our medicare market position in south florida . we paid approximately $ 444.9 million in cash , including transaction costs . we financed the transaction with $ 294.0 million of borrowings under our credit agreement and $ 150.9 million of cash on hand . the purchase price is subject to a balance sheet settlement process with a nine month claims run-out period . this settlement , which will be reflected as an adjustment to goodwill , is not expected to be material . the fair value of the acquired tangible assets ( assumed liabilities ) consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 92116</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>premiums receivable and other current assets</td><td>6510</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>property and equipment and other assets</td><td>21315</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>medical and other expenses payable</td><td>-37375 ( 37375 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-23359 ( 23359 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>-5915 ( 5915 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net tangible assets acquired</td><td>$ 53292</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the value of cash and premiums receivable and other current assets?\nAnswer: 98626.0\nQuestion: what is the balance of property and equipment and other assets\t?\nAnswer: 21315.0\nQuestion: what is the balance of total assets?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "119941.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3486	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin june 2011 , the fasb issued asu no . 2011-05 201ccomprehensive income 2013 presentation of comprehensive income . 201d asu 2011-05 requires comprehensive income , the components of net income , and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements . in both choices , an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income , each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income , and a total amount for comprehensive income . this update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity . the amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income . the amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2011 . the company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2012 . the adoption of asu 2011-05 is for presentation purposes only and had no material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at both december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2012 and prior years . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 24087 and $ 29554 in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2010 , respectively . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 , due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products have generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( \"fifo\" ) method . product cores are included as part of the company's merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company's other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , were $ 134258 and $ 126840 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at the end of fiscal 2012 and 2011 were as follows : december 29 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 292012</td><td>december 312011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 2182419</td><td>$ 1941055</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>126190</td><td>102103</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 2308609</td><td>$ 2043158</td></tr></table> inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company completes physical inventories and other targeted inventory counts in its store locations to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory in these locations . in its distribution centers and pdq aes , the company uses a cycle counting program to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and product core inventory . reserves advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 29 , 2012 , december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 ( in thousands , except per share data ) .\nQuestion: what was the value of fifo inventories at the end of 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2182419.0" } ]
CONVFINQA793	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhave access to liquidity by issuing bonds to public or private investors based on our assessment of the current condition of the credit markets . at december 31 , 2009 , we had a working capital surplus of approximately $ 1.0 billion , which reflects our decision to maintain additional cash reserves to enhance liquidity in response to difficult economic conditions . at december 31 , 2008 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 100 million . historically , we have had a working capital deficit , which is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources and , when necessary , have access to capital to meet any daily and short-term cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3234</td><td>$ 4070</td><td>$ 3277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2175 ( 2175 )</td><td>-2764 ( 2764 )</td><td>-2426 ( 2426 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-458 ( 458 )</td><td>-935 ( 935 )</td><td>-800 ( 800 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 601</td><td>$ 371</td><td>$ 51</td></tr></table> operating activities lower net income in 2009 , a reduction of $ 184 million in the outstanding balance of our accounts receivable securitization program , higher pension contributions of $ 72 million , and changes to working capital combined to decrease cash provided by operating activities compared to 2008 . higher net income and changes in working capital combined to increase cash provided by operating activities in 2008 compared to 2007 . in addition , accelerated tax deductions enacted in 2008 on certain new operating assets resulted in lower income tax payments in 2008 versus 2007 . voluntary pension contributions in 2008 totaling $ 200 million and other pension contributions of $ 8 million partially offset the year-over-year increase versus 2007 . investing activities lower capital investments and higher proceeds from asset sales drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2009 versus 2008 . increased capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2008 compared to 2007. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of cash provided by operating activities from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: 793.0\nQuestion: what is that change divided by the 2007 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.24199" } ]
CONVFINQA9265	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npurchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2014, what percentage of the total sales was due to intersegment ones?\nAnswer: 0.02455\nQuestion: and how much did the alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in that year represent in relation to the one in 2015?\nAnswer: 1.06517\nQuestion: what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2015 average realized price?\nAnswer: 0.06517\nQuestion: and how much is that in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6.51679" } ]
CONVFINQA6886	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) stock-based compensation 2014the company complies with the provisions of sfas no . 148 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation 2014transition and disclosure 2014an amendment of sfas no . 123 , 201d which provides optional transition guidance for those companies electing to voluntarily adopt the accounting provisions of sfas no . 123 . the company continues to use accounting principles board opinion no . 25 ( apb no . 25 ) , 201caccounting for stock issued to employees , 201d to account for equity grants and awards to employees , officers and directors and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 148 . in accordance with apb no . 25 , the company recognizes compensation expense based on the excess , if any , of the quoted stock price at the grant date of the award or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock . the company 2019s stock option plans are more fully described in note 13 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , 201cshare-based payment 201d ( sfas no . 123r ) , described below . the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 ( as amended ) to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net loss as reported</td><td>$ -247587 ( 247587 )</td><td>$ -325321 ( 325321 )</td><td>$ -1163540 ( 1163540 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : stock-based employee compensation expense associated with modifications net of related tax effect included in net loss asreported</td><td>2297</td><td>2077</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards net of related taxeffect</td><td>-23906 ( 23906 )</td><td>-31156 ( 31156 )</td><td>-38126 ( 38126 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pro-forma net loss</td><td>$ -269196 ( 269196 )</td><td>$ -354400 ( 354400 )</td><td>$ -1201666 ( 1201666 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported</td><td>$ -1.10 ( 1.10 )</td><td>$ -1.56 ( 1.56 )</td><td>$ -5.95 ( 5.95 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share pro-forma</td><td>$ -1.20 ( 1.20 )</td><td>$ -1.70 ( 1.70 )</td><td>$ -6.15 ( 6.15 )</td></tr></table> during the year ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , the company modified certain option awards to accelerate vesting and recorded charges of $ 3.0 million and $ 2.3 million , respectively , and corresponding increases to additional paid in capital in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . fair value of financial instruments 2014the carrying values of the company 2019s financial instruments , with the exception of long-term obligations , including current portion , reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 . as of december 31 , 2004 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.3 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . as of december 31 , 2003 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.4 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . fair values are based primarily on quoted market prices for those or similar instruments . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . under the plan , the company matching contribution for periods prior to june 30 , 2004 was 35% ( 35 % ) up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . effective july 1 , 2004 , the plan was amended to increase the company match to 50% ( 50 % ) up to a maximum 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . the company contributed approximately $ 533000 , $ 825000 and $ 979000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , which is a revision of sfas no . 123 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation , 201d and supersedes apb no . 25 , accounting for .\nQuestion: what were employee contributions in 2003?\nAnswer: 825000.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2002?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "979000.0" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.