Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA9630	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our ordinary shares have been publicly traded since november 17 , 2011 when our ordinary shares were listed and began trading on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) under the symbol 201cdlph . 201d on december 4 , 2017 , following the spin-off of delphi technologies , the company changed its name to aptiv plc and its nyse symbol to 201captv . 201d as of january 25 , 2019 , there were 2 shareholders of record of our ordinary shares . the following graph reflects the comparative changes in the value from december 31 , 2013 through december 31 , 2018 , assuming an initial investment of $ 100 and the reinvestment of dividends , if any in ( 1 ) our ordinary shares , ( 2 ) the s&p 500 index and ( 3 ) the automotive peer group . historical share prices of our ordinary shares have been adjusted to reflect the separation . historical performance may not be indicative of future shareholder returns . stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2013 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2018 . ( 1 ) aptiv plc , adjusted for the distribution of delphi technologies on december 4 , 2017 ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive peer group 2013 adient plc , american axle & manufacturing holdings inc , aptiv plc , borgwarner inc , cooper tire & rubber co , cooper- standard holdings inc , dana inc , dorman products inc , ford motor co , garrett motion inc. , general motors co , gentex corp , gentherm inc , genuine parts co , goodyear tire & rubber co , lear corp , lkq corp , meritor inc , motorcar parts of america inc , standard motor products inc , stoneridge inc , superior industries international inc , tenneco inc , tesla inc , tower international inc , visteon corp , wabco holdings inc company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company index</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aptiv plc ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 122.75</td><td>$ 146.49</td><td>$ 117.11</td><td>$ 178.46</td><td>$ 130.80</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 ( 2 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>113.69</td><td>115.26</td><td>129.05</td><td>157.22</td><td>150.33</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automotive peer group ( 3 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>107.96</td><td>108.05</td><td>107.72</td><td>134.04</td><td>106.89</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of the aptiv plc in 2018?\nAnswer: 130.8\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in its value, considering 2018 and the original amount invested in it in 2013?\nAnswer: 30.8\nQuestion: and what was the change in the value of the automotive peer group, considering the 2018 one and the original amount invested in it in 2013?\nAnswer: 6.89\nQuestion: how much does the change in the value of the aptiv plc represent in relation to the original amount invested in it, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.308" } ]
CONVFINQA2404	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>26.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>13.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>summer capacity charges</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled sales</td><td>4.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel recovery revenues</td><td>-14.2 ( 14.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 1149.8</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector . billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors . the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers . summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales . fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates . entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds . these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of net revenues from 2003 to 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "39.7" } ]
CONVFINQA5028	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of pps , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha america inc . cellulose derivatives strategic ventures . our cellulose derivatives ventures generally fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay dividends based on each ventures' performance in the preceding year . in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we received cash dividends of $ 115 million , $ 92 million and $ 83 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( \"us gaap\" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2014 ( in percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2014 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr></table> research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . aoplus ae , aoplus ae2 , aoplus ae3 , ateva ae , avicor ae , britecoat ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx 2122 , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , duroset ae , ecovae ae , factor ae , fortron ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , impet ae , mowilith ae , nutrinova ae , qorus 2122 , riteflex ae , sunett ae , tcx 2122 , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vantageplus 2122 , vantage ae2 , vectra ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc. .\nQuestion: what was the change in cash dividends from 2012 to 2014?\nAnswer: 32.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of those cash dividends in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "83.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6874	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis ( 1 ) includes approximately $ 30 million annually for maintenance capital , which is planned spending on routine capital projects that are necessary to support reliability of service , equipment or systems and to support normal customer growth . ( 2 ) purchase obligations represent the minimum purchase obligation or cancellation charge for contractual obligations to purchase goods or services . for entergy new orleans , almost all of the total consists of unconditional fuel and purchased power obligations , including its obligations under the unit power sales agreement , which is discussed in note 8 to the financial statements . in addition to the contractual obligations given above , entergy new orleans expects to make payments of approximately $ 113 million for the years 2009-2011 related to hurricane katrina and hurricane gustav restoration work and its gas rebuild project , of which $ 32 million is expected to be incurred in 2009 . also , entergy new orleans expects to contribute $ 1.7 million to its pension plan and $ 5.9 million to its other postretirement plans in 2009 . guidance pursuant to the pension protection act of 2006 rules , effective for the 2008 plan year and beyond , may affect the level of entergy new orleans' pension contributions in the future . also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy new orleans has $ 26.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . the planned capital investment estimate for entergy new orleans reflects capital required to support existing business . the estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints , environmental compliance , market volatility , economic trends , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt and preferred stock maturities in notes 5 and 6 and to the financial statements . sources of capital entergy new orleans' sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; and debt and preferred stock issuances . entergy new orleans' receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 60093</td><td>$ 47705</td><td>( $ 37166 )</td><td>( $ 37166 )</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . as discussed above in \"bankruptcy proceedings\" , entergy new orleans issued notes due in three years in satisfaction of its affiliate prepetition accounts payable , including its indebtedness to the entergy system money pool of $ 37.2 million . entergy new orleans has obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through march 2010 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 100 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans' short-term borrowing limits . the long- term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through august 2010. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in net receivables from the money pool between from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: 12388.0\nQuestion: what is the balance of net receivables from the money pool between in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "47705.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9792	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\na e s 2 0 0 0 f i n a n c i a l r e v i e w in may 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired an additional 5% ( 5 % ) of the preferred , non-voting shares of eletropaulo for approximately $ 90 million . in january 2000 , 59% ( 59 % ) of the preferred non-voting shares were acquired for approximately $ 1 billion at auction from bndes , the national development bank of brazil . the price established at auction was approximately $ 72.18 per 1000 shares , to be paid in four annual installments com- mencing with a payment of 18.5% ( 18.5 % ) of the total price upon closing of the transaction and installments of 25.9% ( 25.9 % ) , 27.1% ( 27.1 % ) and 28.5% ( 28.5 % ) of the total price to be paid annually thereafter . at december 31 , 2000 , the company had a total economic interest of 49.6% ( 49.6 % ) in eletropaulo . the company accounts for this investment using the equity method based on the related consortium agreement that allows the exercise of significant influence . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited for approxi- mately $ 40 million . songas limited owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . under the terms of a project management agreement , the company has assumed overall project management responsibility . the project consists of the refurbishment and operation of five natural gas wells in coastal tanzania , the construction and operation of a 65 mmscf/day gas processing plant and related facilities , the construction of a 230 km marine and land pipeline from the gas plant to dar es salaam and the conversion and upgrading of an existing 112 mw power station in dar es salaam to burn natural gas , with an optional additional unit to be constructed at the plant . since the project is currently under construction , no rev- enues or expenses have been incurred , and therefore no results are shown in the following table . in december 2000 , a subsidiary of the company with edf international s.a . ( 201cedf 201d ) completed the acquisition of an additional 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) interest in light from two sub- sidiaries of reliant energy for approximately $ 136 mil- lion . pursuant to the acquisition , the company acquired 30% ( 30 % ) of the shares while edf acquired the remainder . with the completion of this transaction , the company owns approximately 21.14% ( 21.14 % ) of light . in december 2000 , a subsidiary of the company entered into an agreement with edf to jointly acquire an additional 9.2% ( 9.2 % ) interest in light , which is held by a sub- sidiary of companhia siderurgica nacional ( 201ccsn 201d ) . pursuant to this transaction , the company acquired an additional 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) interest in light for $ 114.6 million . this transaction closed in january 2001 . following the purchase of the light shares previously owned by csn , aes and edf will together be the con- trolling shareholders of light and eletropaulo . aes and edf have agreed that aes will eventually take operational control of eletropaulo and the telecom businesses of light and eletropaulo , while edf will eventually take opera- tional control of light and eletropaulo 2019s electric workshop business . aes and edf intend to continue to pursue a fur- ther rationalization of their ownership stakes in light and eletropaulo , the result of which aes would become the sole controlling shareholder of eletropaulo and edf would become the sole controlling shareholder of light . upon consummation of the transaction , aes will begin consolidating eletropaulo 2019s operating results . the struc- ture and process by which this rationalization may be effected , and the resulting timing , have yet to be deter- mined and will likely be subject to approval by various brazilian regulatory authorities and other third parties . as a result , there can be no assurance that this rationalization will take place . in may 1999 , a subsidiary of the company acquired subscription rights from the brazilian state-controlled eletrobras which allowed it to purchase preferred , non- voting shares in eletropaulo and common shares in light . the aggregate purchase price of the subscription rights and the underlying shares in light and eletropaulo was approximately $ 53 million and $ 77 million , respectively , and represented 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) economic ownership interest in their capital stock , respectively . the following table presents summarized financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2000</td><td>1999</td><td>1998</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 6241</td><td>$ 5960</td><td>$ 8091</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1989</td><td>1839</td><td>2079</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>859</td><td>62</td><td>1146</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>2423</td><td>2259</td><td>2712</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>13080</td><td>15359</td><td>19025</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>3370</td><td>3637</td><td>4809</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>5927</td><td>7536</td><td>7356</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>6206</td><td>6445</td><td>9572</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in revenue from 1999 to 2000, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "281.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9791	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nicos corporation on january 29 , 2007 , we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of icos corporation ( icos ) , our partner in the lilly icos llc joint venture for the manufacture and sale of cialis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction . the acquisition brought the full value of cialis to us and enabled us to realize operational effi ciencies in the further development , marketing , and selling of this product . the aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $ 2.3 bil- lion was fi nanced through borrowings . the acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting , resulting in goodwill of $ 646.7 million . no portion of this goodwill was deductible for tax purposes . we determined the following estimated fair values for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition . estimated fair value at january 29 , 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash and short-term investments</td><td>$ 197.7</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>developed product technology ( cialis ) 1</td><td>1659.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tax benefit of net operating losses</td><td>404.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill</td><td>646.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt assumed</td><td>-275.6 ( 275.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-583.5 ( 583.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other assets and liabilities 2014 net</td><td>-32.1 ( 32.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>acquired in-process research and development</td><td>303.5</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 2320.7</td></tr></table> 1this intangible asset will be amortized over the remaining expected patent lives of cialis in each country ; patent expiry dates range from 2015 to 2017 . new indications for and formulations of the cialis compound in clinical testing at the time of the acquisition represented approximately 48 percent of the estimated fair value of the acquired ipr&d . the remaining value of acquired ipr&d represented several other products in development , with no one asset comprising a signifi cant por- tion of this value . the discount rate we used in valuing the acquired ipr&d projects was 20 percent , and the charge for acquired ipr&d of $ 303.5 million recorded in the fi rst quarter of 2007 was not deductible for tax purposes . other acquisitions during the second quarter of 2007 , we acquired all of the outstanding stock of both hypnion , inc . ( hypnion ) , a privately held neuroscience drug discovery company focused on sleep disorders , and ivy animal health , inc . ( ivy ) , a privately held applied research and pharmaceutical product development company focused on the animal health industry , for $ 445.0 million in cash . the acquisition of hypnion provided us with a broader and more substantive presence in the area of sleep disorder research and ownership of hy10275 , a novel phase ii compound with a dual mechanism of action aimed at promoting better sleep onset and sleep maintenance . this was hypnion 2019s only signifi cant asset . for this acquisi- tion , we recorded an acquired ipr&d charge of $ 291.1 million , which was not deductible for tax purposes . because hypnion was a development-stage company , the transaction was accounted for as an acquisition of assets rather than as a business combination and , therefore , goodwill was not recorded . the acquisition of ivy provides us with products that complement those of our animal health business . this acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting . we allocated $ 88.7 million of the purchase price to other identifi able intangible assets , primarily related to marketed products , $ 37.0 million to acquired ipr&d , and $ 25.0 million to goodwill . the other identifi able intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated remaining useful lives of 10 to 20 years . the $ 37.0 million allocated to acquired ipr&d was charged to expense in the second quarter of 2007 . goodwill resulting from this acquisition was fully allocated to the animal health business segment . the amount allocated to each of the intangible assets acquired , including goodwill of $ 25.0 million and the acquired ipr&d of $ 37.0 million , was deductible for tax purposes . product acquisitions in june 2008 , we entered into a licensing and development agreement with transpharma medical ltd . ( trans- pharma ) to acquire rights to its product and related drug delivery system for the treatment of osteoporosis . the product , which is administered transdermally using transpharma 2019s proprietary technology , was in phase ii clinical testing , and had no alternative future use . under the arrangement , we also gained non-exclusive access to trans- pharma 2019s viaderm drug delivery system for the product . as with many development-phase products , launch of the .\nQuestion: as of january 29, 2007, what was the estimated fair value of the goodwill?\nAnswer: 646.7\nQuestion: and what was the total purchase price?\nAnswer: 2320.7\nQuestion: how much, then, did that estimated fair value represent in relation to this price, in percentage?\nAnswer: 0.27867\nQuestion: and what was the percentage of this price represented by the estimated fair value of tax benefit of net operating losses?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.17413" } ]
CONVFINQA810	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company granted 1020 performance shares . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2009</td><td>116677</td><td>$ 280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>134245</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-34630 ( 34630 )</td><td>257</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-19830 ( 19830 )</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2010</td><td>196462</td><td>283</td></tr></table> the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the expense of class a common stock issued to non-executive directors in 2010?\nAnswer: 2.4\nQuestion: what is that times 1000000?\nAnswer: 2400000.0\nQuestion: what is that value divided by the number of shares?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "321.28514" } ]
CONVFINQA6845	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 10.3 million , 10.2 million and 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , 4.5 million and 5.3 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest net of capitalized interest</td><td>$ 252030</td><td>$ 222088</td><td>$ 197383</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income taxes net of refunds received</td><td>$ -39293 ( 39293 )</td><td>$ 41108</td><td>$ 342741</td></tr></table> eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 were $ 388 million , $ 416 million and $ 972 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2014 included non-cash additions of $ 5 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .\nQuestion: what is the ratio of interest net of capitalized interest from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer: 1.13482\nQuestion: what is the quotient less 1?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.13482" } ]
CONVFINQA8991	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n29 annual report 2012 duke realty corporation \| \| those indirect costs not allocated to or absorbed by these operations are charged to general and administrative expenses . we regularly review our total overhead cost structure relative to our leasing , development and construction volume and adjust the level of total overhead , generally through changes in our level of staffing in various functional departments , as necessary in order to control overall general and administrative expense . general and administrative expenses increased from $ 43.1 million in 2011 to $ 46.4 million in 2012 . the following table sets forth the factors that led to the increase in general and administrative expenses from 2011 to 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2011</td><td>$ 43.1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reduction to overall pool of overhead costs ( 1 )</td><td>-11.0 ( 11.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increased absorption of costs by wholly-owned development and leasing activities ( 2 )</td><td>-14.7 ( 14.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduced allocation of costs to service operations and rental operations ( 3 )</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2012</td><td>$ 46.4</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we reduced our total pool of overhead costs , through staff reductions and other measures , as the result of changes in our product mix and anticipated future levels of third-party construction , leasing , management and other operational activities . ( 2 ) we increased our focus on development of wholly-owned properties , and also significantly increased our leasing activity during 2012 , which resulted in an increased absorption of overhead costs . we capitalized $ 30.4 million and $ 20.0 million of our total overhead costs to leasing and development , respectively , for consolidated properties during 2012 , compared to capitalizing $ 25.3 million and $ 10.4 million of such costs , respectively , for 2011 . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs for 2012 and 2011 , respectively . ( 3 ) the reduction in the allocation of overhead costs to service operations and rental operations resulted from reduced volumes of third-party construction projects as well as due to reducing our overall investment in office properties , which are more management intensive . interest expense interest expense allocable to continuing operations increased from $ 220.5 million in 2011 to $ 245.2 million in 2012 . we had $ 47.4 million of interest expense allocated to discontinued operations in 2011 , associated with the properties that were disposed of during 2011 , compared to the allocation of only $ 3.1 million of interest expense to discontinued operations for 2012 . total interest expense , combined for continuing and discontinued operations , decreased from $ 267.8 million in 2011 to $ 248.3 million in 2012 . the reduction in total interest expense was primarily the result of a lower weighted average borrowing rate in 2012 , due to refinancing some higher rate bonds in 2011 and 2012 , as well as a slight decrease in our average level of borrowings compared to 2011 . also , due to an increase in properties under development from 2011 , which met the criteria for capitalization of interest and were financed in part by common equity issuances during 2012 , a $ 5.0 million increase in capitalized interest also contributed to the decrease in total interest expense in 2012 . acquisition-related activity during 2012 , we recognized approximately $ 4.2 million in acquisition costs , compared to $ 2.3 million of such costs in 2011 . the increase from 2011 to 2012 is the result of acquiring a higher volume of medical office properties , where a higher level of acquisition costs are incurred than other property types , in 2012 . during 2011 , we also recognized a $ 1.1 million gain related to the acquisition of a building from one of our 50%-owned unconsolidated joint ventures . discontinued operations subject to certain criteria , the results of operations for properties sold during the year to unrelated parties , or classified as held-for-sale at the end of the period , are required to be classified as discontinued operations . the property specific components of earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental revenues , rental expenses , real estate taxes , allocated interest expense and depreciation expense , as well as the net gain or loss on the disposition of properties . the operations of 150 buildings are currently classified as discontinued operations . these 150 buildings consist of 114 office , 30 industrial , four retail , and two medical office properties . as a result , we classified operating losses , before gain on sales , of $ 1.5 million , $ 1.8 million and $ 7.1 million in discontinued operations for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . of these properties , 28 were sold during 2012 , 101 properties were sold during 2011 and 19 properties were sold during 2010 . the gains on disposal of these properties of $ 13.5 million , $ 100.9 million and $ 33.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and .\nQuestion: what were the general and administrative expenses in 2012?\nAnswer: 46.4\nQuestion: and what were they in 2011?\nAnswer: 43.1\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 3.3\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2011 expenses?\nAnswer: 0.07657\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the increase in the interest expense allocable to continuing operations?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "24.7" } ]
CONVFINQA3722	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 192.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>42.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>25.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-41.2 ( 41.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr></table> the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. .\nQuestion: what is the number of electric consumers in 2007?\nAnswer: 132000.0\nQuestion: what about in 2006?\nAnswer: 95000.0\nQuestion: what is the increase in the number of electric consumers?\nAnswer: 37000.0\nQuestion: what percentage increase does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.38947" } ]
CONVFINQA3844	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe internal revenue code . therefore , cash needed to execute our strategy and invest in new properties , as well as to pay our debt at maturity , must come from one or more of the following sources : 2022 cash not distributed to shareholders , 2022 proceeds of property dispositions , or 2022 proceeds derived from the issuance of new debt or equity securities . it is management 2019s intention that we continually have access to the capital resources necessary to expand and develop our business . as a result , we intend to operate with and maintain a conservative capital structure that will allow us to maintain strong debt service coverage and fixed-charge coverage ratios as part of our commitment to investment-grade debt ratings . we may , from time to time , seek to obtain funds by the following means : 2022 additional equity offerings , 2022 unsecured debt financing and/or mortgage financings , and 2022 other debt and equity alternatives , including formation of joint ventures , in a manner consistent with our intention to operate with a conservative debt structure . cash and cash equivalents were $ 30.5 million and $ 35.0 million at december 31 , 2004 and december 31 , 2003 , respectively . summary of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2004 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>for the year ended december 31 2004 ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 161113</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-154273 ( 154273 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used by financing activities</td><td>-11333 ( 11333 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decrease in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>-4493 ( 4493 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cash and cash equivalents beginning of period</td><td>34968</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cash and cash equivalents end of period</td><td>$ 30475</td></tr></table> the cash provided by operating activities is primarily attributable to the operation of our properties and the change in working capital related to our operations . we used cash of $ 154.3 million during the twelve months ended december 31 , 2004 in investing activities , including the following : 2022 $ 101.7 million for our acquisition of westgate mall , shaw 2019s plaza and several parcels of land , 2022 capital expenditures of $ 59.2 million for development and redevelopment of properties including santana row , 2022 maintenance capital expenditures of approximately $ 36.9 million , 2022 $ 9.4 million capital contribution to a real estate partnership , and 2022 an additional $ 3.2 million net advance under an existing mortgage note receivable ; offset by 2022 $ 41.8 million in net sale proceeds from the sale of properties , and .\nQuestion: what is the percentage decrease in the balance of cash and cash equivalents during 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.12849" } ]
CONVFINQA1985	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the \"2010 credit agreement\" ) which was subsequently terminated in july 2012 . the 2010 credit agreement provided for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into the 2010 credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the 2010 credit agreement was set to terminate on august 5 , 2013 . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 705 million of which $ 34 million was used as of december 31 , 2012 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 2.27% ( 2.27 % ) as of dec . 31 2012 and 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of december 31 2011</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2012 , total indebtedness was 42% ( 42 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 219 million , $ 212 million and $ 189 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . rental expense for operating leases was $ 233 million , $ 249 million and $ 233 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , are ( in millions ) $ 171 in 2013 , $ 135 in 2014 , $ 107 in 2015 , $ 83 in 2016 , $ 64 in 2017 and $ 135 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds of $ 119 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , guarantees outstanding were $ 96 million and $ 90 million , respectively . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 11 million and $ 13 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 11 million and $ 21 million , as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the fair value of each guarantee was estimated by comparing the net present value of two hypothetical cash flow streams , one based on ppg 2019s incremental borrowing rate and the other based on the borrower 2019s incremental borrowing rate , as of the effective date of the guarantee . both streams were discounted at a risk free rate of return . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit , surety bonds or guarantees is likely . 9 . fair value measurement the accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a hierarchy with three levels of inputs used to determine fair value . level 1 inputs are quoted prices ( unadjusted ) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities , are considered to be the most reliable evidence of fair value , and should be used whenever available . level 2 inputs are observable prices that are not quoted on active exchanges . level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs employed for measuring the fair value of assets or liabilities . table of contents notes to the consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what was the rental expense for operating leases in 2011?\nAnswer: 249.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2010?\nAnswer: 233.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\nAnswer: 16.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.06867" } ]
CONVFINQA5515	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nequity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>3946111</td><td>$ 34.67</td><td>3608527</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>3946111</td><td>$ 34.67</td><td>3608527</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2012 plan\" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2011 plan\" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .\nQuestion: what is the number of shares issued times the price per share?\nAnswer: 136811668.37\nQuestion: what is that simplified?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.13681" } ]
CONVFINQA7949	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnet cash used by investing activities in 2013 also included $ 38.2 million for the may 13 , 2013 acquisition of challenger . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the challenger acquisition . capital expenditures in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 70.6 million , $ 79.4 million and $ 61.2 million , respectively . capital expenditures in 2013 included continued investments related to the company 2019s execution of its strategic value creation processes around safety , quality , customer connection , innovation and rci initiatives . capital expenditures in all three years included spending to support the company 2019s strategic growth initiatives . in 2013 , the company continued to invest in new product , efficiency , safety and cost reduction initiatives to expand and improve its manufacturing capabilities worldwide . in 2012 , the company completed the construction of a fourth factory in kunshan , china , following the 2011 construction of a new engineering and research and development facility in kunshan . capital expenditures in all three years also included investments , particularly in the united states , in new product , efficiency , safety and cost reduction initiatives , as well as investments in new production and machine tooling to enhance manufacturing operations , and ongoing replacements of manufacturing and distribution equipment . capital spending in all three years also included spending for the replacement and enhancement of the company 2019s global enterprise resource planning ( erp ) management information systems , as well as spending to enhance the company 2019s corporate headquarters and research and development facilities in kenosha , wisconsin . snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , as well as its available cash on hand and funds available from its credit facilities will be sufficient to fund the company 2019s capital expenditure requirements in 2014 . financing activities net cash used by financing activities was $ 137.8 million in 2013 , $ 127.0 million in 2012 and $ 293.7 million in 2011 . net cash used by financing activities in 2011 reflects the august 2011 repayment of $ 200 million of unsecured 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes upon maturity with available cash . proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises totaled $ 29.2 million in 2013 , $ 46.8 million in 2012 and $ 25.7 million in 2011 . snap-on has undertaken stock repurchases from time to time to offset dilution created by shares issued for employee and franchisee stock purchase plans , stock options and other corporate purposes . in 2013 , snap-on repurchased 926000 shares of its common stock for $ 82.6 million under its previously announced share repurchase programs . as of 2013 year end , snap-on had remaining availability to repurchase up to an additional $ 191.7 million in common stock pursuant to its board of directors 2019 ( the 201cboard 201d ) authorizations . the purchase of snap-on common stock is at the company 2019s discretion , subject to prevailing financial and market conditions . snap-on repurchased 1180000 shares of its common stock for $ 78.1 million in 2012 ; snap-on repurchased 628000 shares of its common stock for $ 37.4 million in 2011 . snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , available cash on hand , and funds available from its credit facilities , will be sufficient to fund the company 2019s share repurchases , if any , in 2014 . snap-on has paid consecutive quarterly cash dividends , without interruption or reduction , since 1939 . cash dividends paid in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 92.0 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 76.7 million , respectively . on november 8 , 2013 , the company announced that its board increased the quarterly cash dividend by 15.8% ( 15.8 % ) to $ 0.44 per share ( $ 1.76 per share per year ) . quarterly dividends declared in 2013 were $ 0.44 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.38 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.58 per share for the year ) . quarterly dividends declared in 2012 were $ 0.38 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.34 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.40 per share for the year ) . quarterly dividends in 2011 were $ 0.34 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.32 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.30 per share for the year ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash dividends paid per common share</td><td>$ 1.58</td><td>$ 1.40</td><td>$ 1.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash dividends paid as a percent of prior-year retained earnings</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td><td>4.4% ( 4.4 % )</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td></tr></table> cash dividends paid as a percent of prior-year retained earnings 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , available cash on hand and funds available from its credit facilities will be sufficient to pay dividends in 2014 . off-balance-sheet arrangements except as included below in the section labeled 201ccontractual obligations and commitments 201d and note 15 to the consolidated financial statements , the company had no off-balance-sheet arrangements as of 2013 year end . 2013 annual report 49 .\nQuestion: what was the difference in cash dividends paid per common share between 2012 and 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.18" } ]
CONVFINQA3673	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .\nQuestion: what was cash from operations in 2009?\nAnswer: 868.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2008?\nAnswer: 641.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\nAnswer: 227.0\nQuestion: what was the 2008 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "641.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8720	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of citi in 2013 less the initial $100 investment?\nAnswer: 10.49\nQuestion: what was the value of the s&p in 2013?\nAnswer: 156.82\nQuestion: what is the value of that less an initial $100 investment\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "56.82" } ]
CONVFINQA101	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nz i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facility</td><td>$ 156.2</td><td>$ 358.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>uncommitted credit facilities</td><td>0.5</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 156.7</td><td>$ 363.9</td></tr></table> z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the total debt in 2002?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "156.7" } ]
CONVFINQA6809	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis setting any of entergy louisiana's rates . therefore , to the extent entergy louisiana's use of the proceeds would ordinarily have reduced its rate base , no change in rate base shall be reflected for ratemaking purposes . the sec approval for additional return of equity capital is now expired . entergy louisiana's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 40549</td><td>( $ 41317 )</td><td>$ 18854</td><td>$ 3812</td></tr></table> money pool activity used $ 81.9 million of entergy louisiana's operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 60.2 million in 2003 , and used $ 15.0 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities the decrease of $ 25.1 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2004 was primarily due to decreased spending on customer service projects , partially offset by increases in spending on transmission projects and fossil plant projects . the increase of $ 56.0 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2003 was primarily due to increased spending on customer service , transmission , and nuclear projects . financing activities the decrease of $ 404.4 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2004 was primarily due to : 2022 the net issuance of $ 98.0 million of long-term debt in 2004 compared to the retirement of $ 261.0 million in 2022 a principal payment of $ 14.8 million in 2004 for the waterford lease obligation compared to a principal payment of $ 35.4 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 29.0 million in common stock dividends paid . the decrease of $ 105.5 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2003 was primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 125.9 million in common stock dividends paid ; and 2022 the repurchase of $ 120 million of common stock from entergy corporation in 2002 . the decrease in net cash used in 2003 was partially offset by the following : 2022 the retirement in 2003 of $ 150 million of 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) series first mortgage bonds compared to the net retirement of $ 134.6 million of first mortgage bonds in 2002 ; and 2022 principal payments of $ 35.4 million in 2003 for the waterford 3 lease obligation compared to principal payments of $ 15.9 million in 2002 . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details of long-term debt . uses of capital entergy louisiana requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. .\nQuestion: in 2004, what was the net issuance of long-term debt?\nAnswer: 98.0\nQuestion: and what was the decrease in net cash used by financing activities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "404.4" } ]
CONVFINQA5239	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n5 . stock based compensation overview maa accounts for its stock based employee compensation plans in accordance with accounting standards governing stock based compensation . these standards require an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the award's fair value on the grant date and recognize the cost over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award , which is generally the vesting period . any liability awards issued are remeasured at each reporting period . maa 2019s stock compensation plans consist of a number of incentives provided to attract and retain independent directors , executive officers and key employees . incentives are currently granted under the second amended and restated 2013 stock incentive plan , or the stock plan , which was approved at the 2018 annual meeting of maa shareholders . the stock plan allows for the grant of restricted stock and stock options up to 2000000 shares . maa believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders . compensation expense is generally recognized for service based restricted stock awards using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the shares regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions . compensation expense for market and performance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in \"general and administrative expenses\" . total compensation expense under the stock plan was $ 12.9 million , $ 10.8 million and $ 12.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was $ 0.5 million , $ 0.2 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was $ 13.5 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.1 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 2.9 million , $ 4.8 million and $ 2.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is provided below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , was $ 71.85 , $ 84.53 and $ 73.20 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free rate</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % ) - 2.14% ( 2.14 % )</td><td>0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )</td><td>0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.884% ( 3.884 % )</td><td>3.573% ( 3.573 % )</td><td>3.634% ( 3.634 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>15.05% ( 15.05 % ) - 17.18% ( 17.18 % )</td><td>20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )</td><td>18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>requisite service period</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td></tr></table> the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the .\nQuestion: what is the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "84.53" } ]
CONVFINQA9650	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nuntil the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings . changes in the fair value of the derivatives that are attributable to the ineffective portion of the hedges , or of derivatives that are not considered to be highly effective hedges , if any , are immediately recognized in earnings . the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding foreign currency hedges at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.3 billion and $ 1.7 billion . the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding interest rate swaps at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 503 million and $ 450 million . derivative instruments did not have a material impact on net earnings and comprehensive income during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 . substantially all of our derivatives are designated for hedge accounting . see note 15 for more information on the fair value measurements related to our derivative instruments . stock-based compensation 2013 compensation cost related to all share-based payments including stock options and restricted stock units is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award . we generally recognize the compensation cost ratably over a three-year vesting period . income taxes 2013 we periodically assess our tax filing exposures related to periods that are open to examination . based on the latest available information , we evaluate our tax positions to determine whether the position will more likely than not be sustained upon examination by the internal revenue service ( irs ) . if we cannot reach a more-likely-than-not determination , no benefit is recorded . if we determine that the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained , we record the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not to be realized when the tax position is settled . we record interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of income tax expense on our statements of earnings . interest and penalties are not material . accumulated other comprehensive loss 2013 changes in the balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of income taxes , consisted of the following ( in millions ) : postretirement benefit plan adjustments other , net accumulated comprehensive . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>postretirement benefit plan adjustments</td><td>other net</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive loss</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2010</td><td>$ -8564 ( 8564 )</td><td>$ -31 ( 31 )</td><td>$ -8595 ( 8595 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other comprehensive ( loss ) income</td><td>-430 ( 430 )</td><td>15</td><td>-415 ( 415 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>-8994 ( 8994 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>-9010 ( 9010 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other comprehensive loss</td><td>-2192 ( 2192 )</td><td>-55 ( 55 )</td><td>-2247 ( 2247 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>-11186 ( 11186 )</td><td>-71 ( 71 )</td><td>-11257 ( 11257 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other comprehensive ( loss ) income</td><td>-2346 ( 2346 )</td><td>110</td><td>-2236 ( 2236 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ -13532 ( 13532 )</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ -13493 ( 13493 )</td></tr></table> the postretirement benefit plan adjustments are shown net of tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 of $ 7.4 billion , $ 6.1 billion , and $ 4.9 billion . these tax benefits include amounts recognized on our income tax returns as current deductions and deferred income taxes , which will be recognized on our tax returns in future years . see note 7 and note 9 for more information on our income taxes and postretirement plans . recent accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2012 , we retrospectively adopted new guidance issued by the financial accounting standards board by presenting total comprehensive income and the components of net income and other comprehensive loss in two separate but consecutive statements . the adoption of this guidance resulted only in a change in how we present other comprehensive loss in our consolidated financial statements and did not have any impact on our results of operations , financial position , or cash flows. .\nQuestion: what was the value of post retirement benefit plan adjustments at the end of 2010?\nAnswer: 8994.0\nQuestion: what was the value at the start of 2010?\nAnswer: 8564.0\nQuestion: what was the net change through the year?\nAnswer: 430.0\nQuestion: what was the value at the start of 2010?\nAnswer: 8564.0\nQuestion: what is the net change divided by the 2010 start value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.05021" } ]
CONVFINQA10133	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see \"state and local rate regulation\" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see \"critical accounting estimates\" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see \"state and local rate regulation\" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .\nQuestion: what is the net revenue in 2007?\nAnswer: 991.1\nQuestion: what about in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "942.1" } ]
CONVFINQA6409	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbhge 2018 form 10-k \| 31 business environment the following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations , financial condition and liquidity position as of and for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes of the company . we operate in more than 120 countries helping customers find , evaluate , drill , produce , transport and process hydrocarbon resources . our revenue is predominately generated from the sale of products and services to major , national , and independent oil and natural gas companies worldwide , and is dependent on spending by our customers for oil and natural gas exploration , field development and production . this spending is driven by a number of factors , including our customers' forecasts of future energy demand and supply , their access to resources to develop and produce oil and natural gas , their ability to fund their capital programs , the impact of new government regulations and most importantly , their expectations for oil and natural gas prices as a key driver of their cash flows . oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 )</td><td>$ 71.34</td><td>$ 54.12</td><td>$ 43.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 )</td><td>65.23</td><td>50.80</td><td>43.29</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 )</td><td>3.15</td><td>2.99</td><td>2.52</td></tr></table> brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 ) $ 71.34 $ 54.12 $ 43.64 wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) 65.23 50.80 43.29 natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) 3.15 2.99 2.52 ( 1 ) energy information administration ( eia ) europe brent spot price per barrel ( 2 ) eia cushing , ok wti ( west texas intermediate ) spot price ( 3 ) eia henry hub natural gas spot price per million british thermal unit 2018 demonstrated the volatility of the oil and gas market . through the first three quarters of 2018 , we experienced stability in the north american and international markets . however , in the fourth quarter of 2018 commodity prices dropped nearly 40% ( 40 % ) resulting in increased customer uncertainty . from an offshore standpoint , through most of 2018 , we saw multiple large offshore projects reach positive final investment decisions , and the lng market and outlook improved throughout 2018 , driven by increased demand globally . in 2018 , the first large north american lng positive final investment decision was reached . outside of north america , customer spending is highly driven by brent oil prices , which increased on average throughout the year . average brent oil prices increased to $ 71.34/bbl in 2018 from $ 54.12/bbl in 2017 , and ranged from a low of $ 50.57/bbl in december 2018 , to a high of $ 86.07/bbl in october 2018 . for the first three quarters of 2018 , brent oil prices increased sequentially . however , in the fourth quarter , brent oil prices declined 39% ( 39 % ) versus the end of the third quarter , as a result of increased supply from the u.s. , worries of a global economic slowdown , and lower than expected production cuts . in north america , customer spending is highly driven by wti oil prices , which similar to brent oil prices , on average increased throughout the year . average wti oil prices increased to $ 65.23/bbl in 2018 from $ 50.80/bbl in 2017 , and ranged from a low of $ 44.48/bbl in december 2018 , to a high of $ 77.41/bbl in june 2018 . in north america , natural gas prices , as measured by the henry hub natural gas spot price , averaged $ 3.15/ mmbtu in 2018 , representing a 6% ( 6 % ) increase over the prior year . throughout the year , henry hub natural gas spot prices ranged from a high of $ 6.24/mmbtu in january 2018 to a low of $ 2.49/mmbtu in february 2018 . according to the u.s . department of energy ( doe ) , working natural gas in storage at the end of 2018 was 2705 billion cubic feet ( bcf ) , which was 15.6% ( 15.6 % ) , or 421 bcf , below the corresponding week in 2017. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in brent oil prices from 2017 to 2018?\nAnswer: 17.22\nQuestion: what was the 2017 price?\nAnswer: 54.12\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.31818" } ]
CONVFINQA295	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe target awards for the other named executive officers were set as follows : joseph f . domino , ceo - entergy texas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; hugh t . mcdonald , ceo - entergy arkansas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; haley fisackerly , ceo - entergy mississippi ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) ; william m . mohl ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) , ceo - entergy gulf states and entergy louisiana ; charles l . rice , jr . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) , ceo - entergy new orleans and theodore h . bunting , jr . - principal accounting officer - the subsidiaries ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) . the target awards for the named executive officers ( other than entergy named executive officers ) were set by their respective supervisors ( subject to ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer ) who allocated a potential incentive pool established by the personnel committee among various of their direct and indirect reports . in setting the target awards , the supervisor took into account considerations similar to those used by the personnel committee in setting the target awards for entergy 2019s named executive officers . target awards are set based on an executive officer 2019s current position and executive management level within the entergy organization . executive management levels at entergy range from level 1 thorough level 4 . mr . denault and mr . taylor hold positions in level 2 whereas mr . bunting and mr . mohl hold positions in level 3 and mr . domino , mr . fisackerly , mr . mcdonald and mr . rice hold positions in level 4 . accordingly , their respective incentive targets differ one from another based on the external market data developed by the committee 2019s independent compensation consultant and the other factors noted above . in december 2010 , the committee determined the executive incentive plan targets to be used for purposes of establishing annual bonuses for 2011 . the committee 2019s determination of the target levels was made after full board review of management 2019s 2011 financial plan for entergy corporation , upon recommendation of the finance committee , and after the committee 2019s determination that the established targets aligned with entergy corporation 2019s anticipated 2011 financial performance as reflected in the financial plan . the targets established to measure management performance against as reported results were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>minimum</td><td>target</td><td>maximum</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>earnings per share ( $ )</td><td>$ 6.10</td><td>$ 6.60</td><td>$ 7.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating cash flow ( $ in billions )</td><td>$ 2.97</td><td>$ 3.35</td><td>$ 3.70</td></tr></table> operating cash flow ( $ in billions ) in january 2012 , after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the committee determined that entergy corporation had exceeded as reported earnings per share target of $ 6.60 by $ 0.95 in 2011 while falling short of the operating cash flow goal of $ 3.35 billion by $ 221 million in 2011 . in accordance with the terms of the annual incentive plan , in january 2012 , the personnel committee certified the 2012 entergy achievement multiplier at 128% ( 128 % ) of target . under the terms of the management effectiveness program , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive if the pre- established underlying performance goals established by the personnel committee are satisfied at the end of the performance period , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee a mechanism to take into consideration specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2012 , the committee eliminated the management effectiveness factor with respect to the 2011 incentive awards , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive awards for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . taylor ) are awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer 2019s supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer. .\nQuestion: what was the shortfall in operating cash flow in 2011?\nAnswer: 221.0\nQuestion: what is that divided by1000000?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.00022" } ]
CONVFINQA1865	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmillion excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .\nQuestion: what is the net sales of printing papers in north american in 2013, in billions?\nAnswer: 2.6\nQuestion: what about in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2600.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2447	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe facility is considered 201cdebt 201d for purposes of a support agreement between american water and awcc , which serves as a functional equivalent of a guarantee by american water of awcc 2019s payment obligations under the credit facility . also , the company acquired an additional revolving line of credit as part of its keystone acquisition . the total commitment under this credit facility was $ 16 million of which $ 2 million was outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 . the following table summarizes information regarding the company 2019s aggregate credit facility commitments , letter of credit sub-limits and available funds under those revolving credit facilities , as well as outstanding amounts of commercial paper and outstanding borrowings under the respective facilities as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 : credit facility commitment available credit facility capacity letter of credit sublimit available letter of credit capacity outstanding commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing ( in millions ) december 31 , 2015 . . . . . $ 1266 $ 1182 $ 150 $ 68 $ 626 $ 2 december 31 , 2014 . . . . . $ 1250 $ 1212 $ 150 $ 112 $ 450 $ 2014 the weighted-average interest rate on awcc short-term borrowings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) and 0.31% ( 0.31 % ) , respectively . interest accrues on the keystone revolving line of credit daily at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) above the greater of the one month or one day libor . capital structure the following table indicates the percentage of our capitalization represented by the components of our capital structure as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total common stockholders' equity</td><td>43.5% ( 43.5 % )</td><td>45.2% ( 45.2 % )</td><td>44.6% ( 44.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value</td><td>50.6% ( 50.6 % )</td><td>50.1% ( 50.1 % )</td><td>49.3% ( 49.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt</td><td>5.9% ( 5.9 % )</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>6.1% ( 6.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> the changes in the capital structure between periods were mainly attributable to changes in outstanding commercial paper balances . debt covenants our debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants . to the extent that we are not in compliance with these covenants such an event may create an event of default under the debt agreement and we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in our ability to pay dividends , issue new debt or access our revolving credit facility . for two of our smaller operating companies , we have informed our counterparties that we will provide only unaudited financial information at the subsidiary level , which resulted in technical non-compliance with certain of their reporting requirements under debt agreements with respect to $ 8 million of outstanding debt . we do not believe this event will materially impact us . our long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that , among other things , limit the company from issuing debt secured by the company 2019s assets , subject to certain exceptions . our failure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations . certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization ( as defined in the relevant documents ) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00 . on december 31 , 2015 , our ratio was 0.56 to 1.00 and therefore we were in compliance with the covenant. .\nQuestion: what percent of capital structure is related to long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value\tin 2015?\nAnswer: 0.506\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\nAnswer: 0.493\nQuestion: what is the net change from 2013 to 2015?\nAnswer: 0.013\nQuestion: what is the ratio of 2015 commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing to 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.39111" } ]
CONVFINQA5896	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\napproximately $ 55 million , which is reported as 201cinvestments 201d in the consolidated balance sheet and as 201cpurchases of marketable securities and investments 201d in the consolidated statement of cash flows . the recovery of approximately $ 25 million of this investment in 2007 reduced 201cinvestments 201d and is shown in cash flows within 201cproceeds from sale of marketable securities and investments . 201d this investment is discussed in more detail under the preceding section entitled industrial and transportation business . additional purchases of investments include additional survivor benefit insurance and equity investments . cash flows from financing activities : years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>change in short-term debt 2014 net</td><td>$ -1222 ( 1222 )</td><td>$ 882</td><td>$ -258 ( 258 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>repayment of debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>-1580 ( 1580 )</td><td>-440 ( 440 )</td><td>-656 ( 656 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>4024</td><td>693</td><td>429</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total cash change in debt</td><td>$ 1222</td><td>$ 1135</td><td>$ -485 ( 485 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchases of treasury stock</td><td>-3239 ( 3239 )</td><td>-2351 ( 2351 )</td><td>-2377 ( 2377 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reissuances of treasury stock</td><td>796</td><td>523</td><td>545</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends paid to stockholders</td><td>-1380 ( 1380 )</td><td>-1376 ( 1376 )</td><td>-1286 ( 1286 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation</td><td>74</td><td>60</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>distributions to minority interests and other 2014 net</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>$ -2547 ( 2547 )</td><td>$ -2061 ( 2061 )</td><td>$ -3625 ( 3625 )</td></tr></table> total debt at december 31 , 2007 , was $ 4.920 billion , up from $ 3.553 billion at year-end 2006 . the net change in short-term debt is primarily due to commercial paper activity . in 2007 , the repayment of debt for maturities greater than 90 days is primarily comprised of commercial paper repayments of approximately $ 1.15 billion and the november 2007 redemption of approximately $ 322 million in convertible notes . in 2007 , proceeds from debt included long-term debt and commercial paper issuances totaling approximately $ 4 billion . this was comprised of eurobond issuances in december 2007 and july 2007 totaling approximately $ 1.5 billion in u.s . dollars , a march 2007 long-term debt issuance of $ 750 million and a december 2007 fixed rate note issuance of $ 500 million , plus commercial paper issuances ( maturities greater than 90 days ) of approximately $ 1.25 billion . increases in long-term debt have been used , in part , to fund share repurchase activities . the company accelerated purchases of treasury stock when compared to prior years , buying back $ 3.2 billion in shares in 2007 . total debt was 30% ( 30 % ) of total capital ( total capital is defined as debt plus equity ) , compared with 26% ( 26 % ) at year-end 2006 . debt securities , including 2007 debt issuances , the company 2019s shelf registration , dealer remarketable securities and convertible notes , are all discussed in more detail in note 10 . the company has a \"well-known seasoned issuer\" shelf registration statement , effective february 24 , 2006 , to register an indeterminate amount of debt or equity securities for future sales . on june 15 , 2007 , the company registered 150718 shares of the company's common stock under this shelf on behalf of and for the sole benefit of the selling stockholders in connection with the company's acquisition of assets of diamond productions , inc . the company intends to use the proceeds from future securities sales off this shelf for general corporate purposes . in connection with this shelf registration , in june 2007 the company established a medium-term notes program through which up to $ 3 billion of medium-term notes may be offered . in december 2007 , 3m issued a five-year , $ 500 million , fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 4.65% ( 4.65 % ) under this medium-term notes program . this program has a remaining capacity of $ 2.5 billion as of december 31 , 2007 . the company 2019s $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities ( classified as current portion of long-term debt ) were remarketed for one year in december 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities ( final maturity 2010 ) and $ 62 million of floating rate notes ( final maturity 2044 ) are classified as current portion of long- term debt as the result of put provisions associated with these debt instruments . the company has convertible notes with a book value of $ 222 million at december 31 , 2007 . the next put option date for these convertible notes is november 2012 . in november 2007 , 364598 outstanding bonds were redeemed resulting in a payout from 3m of approximately $ 322 million . repurchases of common stock are made to support the company 2019s stock-based employee compensation plans and for other corporate purposes . in february 2007 , 3m 2019s board of directors authorized a two-year share repurchase of up to $ 7.0 billion for the period from february 12 , 2007 to february 28 , 2009 . as of december 31 , 2007 , approximately $ 4.1 billion remained available for repurchase . refer to the table titled 201cissuer purchases of equity securities 201d in part ii , item 5 , for more information. .\nQuestion: what is the difference between the total debt at december 31, 2007 and that at december 31, 2006?\nAnswer: 1.367\nQuestion: how much does that difference represents in relation to the total debt at december 31, 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.38475" } ]
CONVFINQA1049	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 348</td><td>$ 352</td><td>$ 364</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for current year tax positions</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>146</td><td>2</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>( 26 )</td><td>( 5 )</td><td>( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>( 13 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>( 7 )</td><td>( 1 )</td><td>( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 463</td><td>$ 348</td><td>$ 352</td></tr></table> the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years . the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded . while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits . however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty . it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2018 . our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted . 22 . discontinued operations due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , sul and eletropaulo , to reduce the company's exposure to the brazilian distribution market . the disposals of sul and eletropaulo were completed in october 2016 and june 2018 , respectively . eletropaulo 2014 in november 2017 , eletropaulo converted its preferred shares into ordinary shares and transitioned the listing of those shares to the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance . upon conversion of the preferred shares into ordinary shares , aes no longer controlled eletropaulo , but maintained significant influence over the business . as a result , the company deconsolidated eletropaulo . after deconsolidation , the company's 17% ( 17 % ) ownership interest was reflected as an equity method investment . the company recorded an after-tax loss on deconsolidation of $ 611 million , which primarily consisted of $ 455 million related to cumulative translation losses and $ 243 million related to pension losses reclassified from aocl . in december 2017 , all the remaining criteria were met for eletropaulo to qualify as a discontinued operation . therefore , its results of operations and financial position were reported as such in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented . in june 2018 , the company completed the sale of its entire 17% ( 17 % ) ownership interest in eletropaulo through a bidding process hosted by the brazilian securities regulator , cvm . gross proceeds of $ 340 million were received at our subsidiary in brazil , subject to the payment of taxes . upon disposal of eletropaulo , the company recorded a pre-tax gain on sale of $ 243 million ( after-tax $ 199 million ) . excluding the gain on sale , eletropaulo's pre-tax loss attributable to aes was immaterial for the year ended december 31 , 2018 . eletropaulo's pre-tax loss attributable to aes , including the loss on deconsolidation , for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 was $ 633 million and $ 192 million , respectively . prior to its classification as discontinued operations , eletropaulo was reported in the south america sbu reportable segment . sul 2014 the company executed an agreement for the sale of sul , a wholly-owned subsidiary , in june 2016 . the results of operations and financial position of sul are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented . upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after-tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pre-tax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in sul . prior to the impairment charge , the carrying value of the sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell . however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the sul disposal group. .\nQuestion: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2018?\nAnswer: 463.0\nQuestion: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2017?\nAnswer: 348.0\nQuestion: what is the change in value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "115.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1834	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements . the grand gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher operating costs . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to new customers in the primary metals industry and expansion projects and an increase in demand for existing customers in the chlor-alkali industry . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 1542</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fitzpatrick sale</td><td>-158 ( 158 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nuclear volume</td><td>-89 ( 89 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement</td><td>57</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nuclear fuel expenses</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2017 net revenue</td><td>$ 1469</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 73 million in 2017 primarily due to the absence of net revenue from the fitzpatrick plant after it was sold to exelon in march 2017 and lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more outage days in 2017 as compared to 2016 . the decrease was partially offset by an increase resulting from the reimbursement agreement with exelon pursuant to which exelon reimbursed entergy for specified out-of-pocket costs associated with preparing for the refueling and operation of fitzpatrick that otherwise would have been avoided had entergy shut down fitzpatrick in january 2017 and a decrease in nuclear fuel expenses primarily related to the impairments of the indian point 2 , indian point 3 , and palisades plants and related assets . revenues received from exelon in 2017 under the reimbursement agreement are offset by other operation and maintenance expenses and taxes other than income taxes and had no effect on net income . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the sale of fitzpatrick , the reimbursement agreement with exelon , and the impairments and related charges . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\nQuestion: what was the value change in net revenue from 2016 to 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "73.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2864	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n35% ( 35 % ) due primarily to certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no u.s . taxes are provided because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of september 24 , 2011 , the company had deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences , tax losses , and tax credits of $ 3.2 billion , and deferred tax liabilities of $ 9.2 billion . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences , will be sufficient to fully recover the deferred tax assets . the company will continue to evaluate the realizability of deferred tax assets quarterly by assessing the need for and amount of a valuation allowance . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . all irs audit issues for years prior to 2004 have been resolved . in addition , the company is subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities . management believes that adequate provisions have been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 81570</td><td>$ 51011</td><td>$ 33992</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 5369</td><td>$ 5510</td><td>$ 3361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>$ 776</td><td>$ 1051</td><td>$ 455</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 17018</td><td>$ 20956</td><td>$ 20049</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 37529</td><td>$ 18595</td><td>$ 10159</td></tr></table> cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities increased $ 30.6 billion or 60% ( 60 % ) during 2011 . the principal components of this net increase was the cash generated by operating activities of $ 37.5 billion , which was partially offset by payments for acquisition of property , plant and equipment of $ 4.3 billion , payments for acquisition of intangible assets of $ 3.2 billion and payments made in connection with business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 244 million . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly rated securities and its policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer . the company 2019s investment policy requires investments to generally be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss . as of september 24 , 2011 and september 25 , 2010 , $ 54.3 billion and $ 30.8 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . capital assets the company 2019s capital expenditures were $ 4.6 billion during 2011 , consisting of approximately $ 614 million for retail store facilities and $ 4.0 billion for other capital expenditures , including product tooling and manufacturing .\nQuestion: what is the change in annual operating cash flow from 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: 8436.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.8304" } ]
CONVFINQA10649	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 123 , as amended by sfas no . 148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 . the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>approximate risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.23% ( 4.23 % )</td><td>4.00% ( 4.00 % )</td><td>4.53% ( 4.53 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan )</td><td>80.6% ( 80.6 % )</td><td>86.6% ( 86.6 % )</td><td>92.3% ( 92.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans )</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) . the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico . the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure . during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 . no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 . ( see note 10. ) .\nQuestion: what is the the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2003?\nAnswer: 6.32\nQuestion: what about 2002?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.23" } ]
CONVFINQA8212	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2003 , aggregate principal payments of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 77622</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>115444</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>365051</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>728153</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>808043</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1650760</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total cash obligations</td><td>3745073</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accreted value of original issue discount of the ati 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) notes</td><td>-339601 ( 339601 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>accreted value of the related warrants</td><td>-44247 ( 44247 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 31 2003</td><td>$ 3361225</td></tr></table> the holders of the company 2019s convertible notes have the right to require the company to repurchase their notes on specified dates prior to their maturity dates in 2009 and 2010 , but the company may pay the purchase price by issuing shares of class a common stock , subject to certain conditions . obligations with respect to the right of the holders to put the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes and 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes have been included in the table above as if such notes mature on the date of their put rights in 2006 and 2007 , respectively . ( see note 19. ) 8 . derivative financial instruments under the terms of the credit facilities , the company is required to enter into interest rate protection agreements on at least 50% ( 50 % ) of its variable rate debt . under these agreements , the company is exposed to credit risk to the extent that a counterparty fails to meet the terms of a contract . such exposure is limited to the current value of the contract at the time the counterparty fails to perform . the company believes its contracts as of december 31 , 2003 are with credit worthy institutions . as of december 31 , 2003 , the company had three interest rate caps outstanding that include an aggregate notional amount of $ 500.0 million ( each at an interest rate of 5% ( 5 % ) ) and expire in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , liabilities related to derivative financial instruments of $ 0.0 million and $ 15.5 million are reflected in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $ 0.3 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 0.2 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 5.9 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 3.2 million ) into results of operations . during the year ended december 31 , 2002 , the company recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $ 9.1 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 4.9 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 19.5 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 10.5 million ) into results of operations . hedge ineffectiveness resulted in a gain of approximately $ 1.0 million and a loss of approximately $ 2.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively , which are recorded in loss on investments and other expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for those periods . the company records the changes in fair value of its derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges in loss on investments and other expense . the company does not anticipate reclassifying any derivative losses into its statement of operations within the next twelve months , as there are no amounts included in other comprehensive loss as of december 31 , 2003. .\nQuestion: what was the balance as of december 2013?\nAnswer: 3361225.0\nQuestion: and what was the long-term debt due in 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "77622.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9474	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n35% ( 35 % ) due primarily to certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no u.s . taxes are provided because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of september 24 , 2011 , the company had deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences , tax losses , and tax credits of $ 3.2 billion , and deferred tax liabilities of $ 9.2 billion . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences , will be sufficient to fully recover the deferred tax assets . the company will continue to evaluate the realizability of deferred tax assets quarterly by assessing the need for and amount of a valuation allowance . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . all irs audit issues for years prior to 2004 have been resolved . in addition , the company is subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities . management believes that adequate provisions have been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 81570</td><td>$ 51011</td><td>$ 33992</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 5369</td><td>$ 5510</td><td>$ 3361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>$ 776</td><td>$ 1051</td><td>$ 455</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 17018</td><td>$ 20956</td><td>$ 20049</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 37529</td><td>$ 18595</td><td>$ 10159</td></tr></table> cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities increased $ 30.6 billion or 60% ( 60 % ) during 2011 . the principal components of this net increase was the cash generated by operating activities of $ 37.5 billion , which was partially offset by payments for acquisition of property , plant and equipment of $ 4.3 billion , payments for acquisition of intangible assets of $ 3.2 billion and payments made in connection with business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 244 million . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly rated securities and its policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer . the company 2019s investment policy requires investments to generally be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss . as of september 24 , 2011 and september 25 , 2010 , $ 54.3 billion and $ 30.8 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . capital assets the company 2019s capital expenditures were $ 4.6 billion during 2011 , consisting of approximately $ 614 million for retail store facilities and $ 4.0 billion for other capital expenditures , including product tooling and manufacturing .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the annual operating cash flow from 2010 to 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "18934.0" } ]
CONVFINQA47	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>attala costs</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>6.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>base revenue</td><td>5.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-4.0 ( 4.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-2.7 ( 2.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 498.8</td></tr></table> the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in \"liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital\" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in \"state and local rate regulation\" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .\nQuestion: what is the difference between the net revenue of 2008 and 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11.9" } ]
CONVFINQA3884	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfor the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>1.85% ( 1.85 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>26.50</td><td>28.70</td><td>27.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.60</td><td>4.19</td><td>3.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>7.8</td><td>7.8</td><td>5.0</td></tr></table> compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\\\fc\\\\delivery_1024177\\\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .\nQuestion: what was the change in the risk-free interest rate between 2004 and 2006?\nAnswer: 1.58\nQuestion: and the percentage change over this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.52318" } ]
CONVFINQA7049	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsegment includes awe and our share of earnings for our investment in ula , which provides expendable launch services to the u.s . government . space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 9409</td><td>$ 9105</td><td>$ 9202</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1289</td><td>1171</td><td>1187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>13.7% ( 13.7 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog atyear-end</td><td>$ 18900</td><td>$ 17400</td><td>$ 20300</td></tr></table> 2016 compared to 2015 space systems 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 304 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was attributable to net sales of approximately $ 410 million from awe following the consolidation of this business in the third quarter of 2016 ; and approximately $ 150 million for commercial space transportation programs due to increased launch-related activities ; and approximately $ 70 million of higher net sales for various programs ( primarily fleet ballistic missiles ) due to increased volume . these increases were partially offset by a decrease in net sales of approximately $ 340 million for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily sbirs and muos ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 118 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was primarily attributable to a non-cash , pre-tax gain of approximately $ 127 million related to the consolidation of awe ; and approximately $ 80 million of increased equity earnings from joint ventures ( primarily ula ) . these increases were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $ 105 million for government satellite programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily sbirs , muos and mission solutions programs ) and decreased volume . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 185 million lower in 2016 compared to 2015 . 2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $ 97 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to approximately $ 335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily aehf ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs ; and approximately $ 55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 235 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 75 million for the orion program due to increased volume . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 16 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased approximately $ 85 million for government satellite programs due primarily to increased risk retirements . this increase was offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for commercial satellite programs due to performance matters on certain programs ; and approximately $ 35 million due to decreased equity earnings in joint ventures . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . equity earnings total equity earnings recognized by space systems ( primarily ula ) represented approximately $ 325 million , $ 245 million and $ 280 million , or 25% ( 25 % ) , 21% ( 21 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) of this business segment 2019s operating profit during 2016 , 2015 and backlog backlog increased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the addition of awe 2019s backlog . backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to lower orders for government satellite programs and the orion program and higher sales on the orion program . trends we expect space systems 2019 2017 net sales to decrease in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2016 , driven by program lifecycles on government satellite programs , partially offset by the recognition of awe net sales for a full year in 2017 versus a partial year in 2016 following the consolidation of awe in the third quarter of 2016 . operating profit .\nQuestion: what was the change in backlog at year-end from 2015 to 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1500.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3260	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( a ) excludes discontinued operations . ( b ) earnings before interest expense and taxes as a percent of average total assets . ( c ) total debt as a percent of the sum of total debt , shareholders 2019 equity and non-current deferred income tax liabilities . the results above include the impact of the specified items detailed below . additional discussion regarding the specified items in fiscal years 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are provided in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>years ended september 30 2017</td><td>years ended september 30 2016</td><td>years ended september 30 2015</td><td>years ended september 30 2014</td><td>years ended september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total specified items</td><td>$ 1466</td><td>$ 1261</td><td>$ 1186</td><td>$ 153</td><td>$ 442</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>after-tax impact of specified items</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 892</td><td>$ 786</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impact of specified items on diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ -4.34 ( 4.34 )</td><td>$ -4.10 ( 4.10 )</td><td>$ -3.79 ( 3.79 )</td><td>$ -0.51 ( 0.51 )</td><td>$ -1.40 ( 1.40 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impact of dilution from share issuances</td><td>$ -0.54 ( 0.54 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -0.02 ( 0.02 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following commentary should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes . within the tables presented throughout this discussion , certain columns may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes . percentages and earnings per share amounts presented are calculated from the underlying amounts . references to years throughout this discussion relate to our fiscal years , which end on september 30 . company overview description of the company and business segments becton , dickinson and company ( 201cbd 201d ) is a global medical technology company engaged in the development , manufacture and sale of a broad range of medical supplies , devices , laboratory equipment and diagnostic products used by healthcare institutions , life science researchers , clinical laboratories , the pharmaceutical industry and the general public . the company's organizational structure is based upon two principal business segments , bd medical ( 201cmedical 201d ) and bd life sciences ( 201clife sciences 201d ) . bd 2019s products are manufactured and sold worldwide . our products are marketed in the united states and internationally through independent distribution channels and directly to end-users by bd and independent sales representatives . we organize our operations outside the united states as follows : europe ; ema ( which includes the commonwealth of independent states , the middle east and africa ) ; greater asia ( which includes japan and asia pacific ) ; latin america ( which includes mexico , central america , the caribbean , and south america ) ; and canada . we continue to pursue growth opportunities in emerging markets , which include the following geographic regions : eastern europe , the middle east , africa , latin america and certain countries within asia pacific . we are primarily focused on certain countries whose healthcare systems are expanding , in particular , china and india . strategic objectives bd remains focused on delivering sustainable growth and shareholder value , while making appropriate investments for the future . bd management operates the business consistent with the following core strategies : 2022 to increase revenue growth by focusing on our core products , services and solutions that deliver greater benefits to patients , healthcare workers and researchers; .\nQuestion: what is the value for total specified items in 2015?\nAnswer: 1186.0\nQuestion: what is the value in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "153.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6527	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsynopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) and other electronic applications markets . the company believes the acquisition will expand its technology portfolio , channel reach and total addressable market by adding complementary products and expertise for fpga solutions and rapid asic prototyping . purchase price . synopsys paid $ 8.00 per share for all outstanding shares including certain vested options of synplicity for an aggregate cash payment of $ 223.3 million . additionally , synopsys assumed certain employee stock options and restricted stock units , collectively called 201cstock awards . 201d the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 180618</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of assumed vested or earned stock awards</td><td>4169</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition related costs</td><td>8016</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price consideration</td><td>$ 192803</td></tr></table> acquisition related costs consist primarily of professional services , severance and employee related costs and facilities closure costs of which $ 6.8 million have been paid as of october 31 , 2009 . fair value of stock awards assumed . an aggregate of 4.7 million shares of synplicity stock options and restricted stock units were exchanged for synopsys stock options and restricted stock units at an exchange ratio of 0.3392 per share . the fair value of stock options assumed was determined using a black-scholes valuation model . the fair value of stock awards vested or earned of $ 4.2 million was included as part of the purchase price . the fair value of unvested awards of $ 5.0 million will be recorded as operating expense over the remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . purchase price allocation . the company allocated $ 80.0 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets to be amortized over two to seven years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 4.8 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired , was $ 120.3 million and will not be amortized . goodwill primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of cost synergies and sales growth from the integration of synplicity 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations to provide an expansion of products and market reach . fiscal 2007 acquisitions during fiscal year 2007 , the company completed certain purchase acquisitions for cash . the company allocated the total purchase considerations of $ 54.8 million ( which included acquisition related costs of $ 1.4 million ) to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 36.6 million . acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 14.3 million are being amortized over two to nine years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 3.2 million. .\nQuestion: what amount was allocated to identifiable intangible assets, in thousands?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "80000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA11032	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmajority of the increased tax position is attributable to temporary differences . the increase in 2014 current period tax positions related primarily to the company 2019s change in tax accounting method filed in 2008 for repair and maintenance costs on its utility plant . the company does not anticipate material changes to its unrecognized tax benefits within the next year . if the company sustains all of its positions at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , an unrecognized tax benefit of $ 9444 and $ 7439 , respectively , excluding interest and penalties , would impact the company 2019s effective tax rate . the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2012</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-5965 ( 5965 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 13555</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3176 ( 3176 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2014</td><td>$ 10379</td></tr></table> included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based operations segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 13 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and commingled funds including equity and bond funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies , real estate funds and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees. .\nQuestion: what was the valuation allowance at the end of 2014?\nAnswer: 10379.0\nQuestion: what was the balance at the start of 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "21579.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7410	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the units consisted of ( i ) approximately 81.8 million preferred a units par value $ 1.00 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the preferred a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after one year or callable by the company any time after six months and contain a promote feature based upon an increase in net operating income of the properties capped at a 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) increase , ( ii ) 2000 class a preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to libor plus 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) per annum on the class a preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , ( iii ) 2627 class b-1 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-1 preferred par value and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock , equal to the cash redemption amount , as defined , ( iv ) 5673 class b-2 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-2 preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , and ( v ) 640001 class c downreit units , valued at an issuance price of $ 30.52 per unit which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock equal to the class c cash amount , as defined . the following units have been redeemed as of december 31 , 2010 : redeemed par value redeemed ( in millions ) redemption type . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>units redeemed</td><td>par value redeemed ( in millions )</td><td>redemption type</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>preferred a units</td><td>2200000</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a preferred units</td><td>2000</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 preferred units</td><td>2438</td><td>$ 24.4</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 preferred units</td><td>5576</td><td>$ 55.8</td><td>cash/charitable contribution</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class c downreit units</td><td>61804</td><td>$ 1.9</td><td>cash</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $ 110.4 million and $ 113.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2006 , the company acquired two shopping center properties located in bay shore and centereach , ny . included in noncontrolling interests was approximately $ 41.6 million , including a discount of $ 0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $ 3.8 million , in redeemable units ( the 201credeemable units 201d ) , issued by the company in connection with these transactions . the prop- erties were acquired through the issuance of $ 24.2 million of redeemable units , which are redeemable at the option of the holder ; approximately $ 14.0 million of fixed rate redeemable units and the assumption of approximately $ 23.4 million of non-recourse debt . the redeemable units consist of ( i ) 13963 class a units , par value $ 1000 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 5% ( 5 % ) per annum of the class a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2011 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2016 , and ( ii ) 647758 class b units , valued at an issuance price of $ 37.24 per unit , which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2007 , for cash or at the option of the company for common stock at a ratio of 1:1 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2026 . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until april 2016 and april 2026 for the centereach , ny , and bay shore , ny , assets , respectively . during 2007 , 30000 units , or $ 1.1 million par value , of theclass bunits were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the company . noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $ 40.4 million and $ 40.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . noncontrolling interests also includes 138015 convertible units issued during 2006 , by the company , which were valued at approxi- mately $ 5.3 million , including a fair market value adjustment of $ 0.3 million , related to an interest acquired in an office building located in albany , ny . these units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the company for the company 2019s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 . the holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the company 2019s common stock . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until january 2017. .\nQuestion: what was the value of noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units in 2010?\nAnswer: 110.4\nQuestion: what was the value in 2009?\nAnswer: 113.1\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "223.5" } ]
CONVFINQA2366	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfair value of financial instruments we believe that the fair values of current assets and current liabilities approximate their reported carrying amounts . the fair values of non-current financial assets , liabilities and derivatives are shown in the following table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2005 carrying amount</td><td>2005 fair value</td><td>2005 carrying amount</td><td>fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes and other long-term assets</td><td>$ 1374</td><td>$ 1412</td><td>$ 1702</td><td>$ 1770</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt and other long-term liabilities</td><td>$ 1636</td><td>$ 1685</td><td>$ 848</td><td>$ 875</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivative instruments</td><td>$ 6</td><td>$ 6</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> we value notes and other receivables based on the expected future cash flows dis- counted at risk-adjusted rates . we determine valuations for long-term debt and other long-term liabilities based on quoted market prices or expected future payments dis- counted at risk-adjusted rates . derivative instruments during 2003 , we entered into an interest rate swap agreement under which we receive a floating rate of interest and pay a fixed rate of interest . the swap modifies our interest rate exposure by effectively converting a note receivable with a fixed rate to a floating rate . the aggregate notional amount of the swap is $ 92 million and it matures in 2010 . the swap is classified as a fair value hedge under fas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities 201d ( 201cfas no . 133 201d ) , and the change in the fair value of the swap , as well as the change in the fair value of the underlying note receivable , is recognized in interest income . the fair value of the swap was a $ 1 million asset at year-end 2005 , and a $ 3 million liability at year-end 2004 . the hedge is highly effective , and therefore , no net gain or loss was reported during 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 . during 2005 , we entered into two interest rate swap agreements to manage the volatil- ity of the u.s . treasury component of the interest rate risk associated with the forecasted issuance our series f senior notes and the exchange of our series c and e senior notes for new series g senior notes . both swaps were designated as cash flow hedges under fas no . 133 and were terminated upon pricing of the notes . both swaps were highly effective in offsetting fluctuations in the u.s . treasury component . thus , there was no net gain or loss reported in earnings during 2005 . the total amount for these swaps was recorded in other comprehensive income and was a net loss of $ 2 million during 2005 , which will be amortized to interest expense using the interest method over the life of the notes . at year-end 2005 , we had six outstanding interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk associated with the residual interests we retain in conjunction with our timeshare note sales . historically , we were required by purchasers and/or rating agen- cies to utilize interest rate swaps to protect the excess spread within our sold note pools . the aggregate notional amount of the swaps is $ 380 million , and they expire through 2022 . these swaps are not accounted for as hedges under fas no . 133 . the fair value of the swaps is a net asset of $ 5 million at year-end 2005 , and a net asset of approximately $ 3 million at year-end 2004 . we recorded a $ 2 million net gain during 2005 and 2004 , and a $ 3 million net gain during 2003 . during 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , we entered into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk associated with forecasted timeshare note sales . during 2005 , one swap was designated as a cash flow hedge under fas no . 133 and was highly effective in offsetting interest rate fluctuations . the amount of the ineffectiveness is immaterial . the second swap entered into in 2005 did not qualify for hedge accounting . the non-qualifying swaps resulted in a loss of $ 3 million during 2005 , a gain of $ 2 million during 2004 and a loss of $ 4 million during 2003 . these amounts are included in the gains from the sales of timeshare notes receivable . during 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , we entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to manage the foreign currency exposure related to certain monetary assets . the aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amount of the contracts is $ 544 million at year-end 2005 . the forward exchange contracts do not qualify as hedges in accordance with fas no . 133 . the fair value of the forward contracts is a liability of $ 2 million at year-end 2005 and zero at year-end 2004 . we recorded a $ 26 million gain during 2005 and a $ 3 million and $ 2 million net loss during 2004 and 2003 , respectively , relating to these forward foreign exchange contracts . the net gains and losses for all years were offset by income and losses recorded from translating the related monetary assets denominated in foreign currencies into u.s . dollars . during 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , we entered into foreign exchange option and forward contracts to hedge the potential volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with variations in foreign exchange rates . the aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amounts of the contracts is $ 27 million at year-end 2005 . these contracts have terms of less than one year and are classified as cash flow hedges . changes in their fair values are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income . the fair value of the option contracts is approximately zero at year-end 2005 and 2004 . during 2004 , it was deter- mined that certain derivatives were no longer effective in offsetting the hedged item . thus , cash flow hedge accounting treatment was discontinued and the ineffective con- tracts resulted in a loss of $ 1 million , which was reported in earnings for 2004 . the remaining hedges were highly effective and there was no net gain or loss reported in earnings for 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 . as of year-end 2005 , there were no deferred gains or losses on existing contracts accumulated in other comprehensive income that we expect to reclassify into earnings over the next year . during 2005 , we entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to manage currency exchange rate volatility associated with certain investments in foreign operations . one contract was designated as a hedge in the net investment of a foreign operation under fas no . 133 . the hedge was highly effective and resulted in a $ 1 million net loss in the cumulative translation adjustment at year-end 2005 . certain contracts did not qualify as hedges under fas no . 133 and resulted in a gain of $ 3 million for 2005 . the contracts offset the losses associated with translation adjustments for various investments in for- eign operations . the contracts have an aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amounts of $ 229 million and a fair value of approximately zero at year-end 2005 . contingencies guarantees we issue guarantees to certain lenders and hotel owners primarily to obtain long-term management contracts . the guarantees generally have a stated maximum amount of funding and a term of five years or less . the terms of guarantees to lenders generally require us to fund if cash flows from hotel operations are inadequate to cover annual debt service or to repay the loan at the end of the term . the terms of the guarantees to hotel owners generally require us to fund if the hotels do not attain specified levels of 5 0 \| m a r r i o t t i n t e r n a t i o n a l , i n c . 2 0 0 5 .\nQuestion: what is the difference between fair value and carrying amount for notes and other long-term assets\tin 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "38.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7887	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company recorded equity earnings , net of taxes , related to ilim of $ 290 million in 2018 , compared with earnings of $ 183 million in 2017 , and $ 199 million in 2016 . operating results recorded in 2018 included an after-tax non-cash foreign exchange loss of $ 82 million , compared with an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 15 million in 2017 and an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 25 million in 2016 , primarily on the remeasurement of ilim's u.s . dollar denominated net debt . ilim delivered outstanding performance in 2018 , driven largely by higher price realization and strong demand . sales volumes for the joint venture increased year over year for shipments to china of softwood pulp and linerboard , but were offset by decreased sales of hardwood pulp to china . sales volumes in the russian market increased for softwood pulp and hardwood pulp , but decreased for linerboard . average sales price realizations were significantly higher in 2018 for sales of softwood pulp , hardwood pulp and linerboard to china and other export markets . average sales price realizations in russian markets increased year over year for all products . input costs were higher in 2018 , primarily for wood , fuel and chemicals . distribution costs were negatively impacted by tariffs and inflation . the company received cash dividends from the joint venture of $ 128 million in 2018 , $ 133 million in 2017 and $ 58 million in entering the first quarter of 2019 , sales volumes are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2018 , due to the seasonal slowdown in china and fewer trading days . based on pricing to date in the current quarter , average sales prices are expected to decrease for hardwood pulp , softwood pulp and linerboard to china . input costs are projected to be relatively flat , while distribution costs are expected to increase . equity earnings - gpip international paper recorded equity earnings of $ 46 million on its 20.5% ( 20.5 % ) ownership position in gpip in 2018 . the company received cash dividends from the investment of $ 25 million in 2018 . liquidity and capital resources overview a major factor in international paper 2019s liquidity and capital resource planning is its generation of operating cash flow , which is highly sensitive to changes in the pricing and demand for our major products . while changes in key cash operating costs , such as energy , raw material , mill outage and transportation costs , do have an effect on operating cash generation , we believe that our focus on pricing and cost controls has improved our cash flow generation over an operating cycle . cash uses during 2018 were primarily focused on working capital requirements , capital spending , debt reductions and returning cash to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases under the company's share repurchase program . cash provided by operating activities cash provided by operations , including discontinued operations , totaled $ 3.2 billion in 2018 , compared with $ 1.8 billion for 2017 , and $ 2.5 billion for 2016 . cash used by working capital components ( accounts receivable , contract assets and inventory less accounts payable and accrued liabilities , interest payable and other ) totaled $ 439 million in 2018 , compared with cash used by working capital components of $ 402 million in 2017 , and cash provided by working capital components of $ 71 million in 2016 . investment activities including discontinued operations , investment activities in 2018 increased from 2017 , as 2018 included higher capital spending . in 2016 , investment activity included the purchase of weyerhaeuser's pulp business for $ 2.2 billion in cash , the purchase of the holmen business for $ 57 million in cash , net of cash acquired , and proceeds from the sale of the asia packaging business of $ 108 million , net of cash divested . the company maintains an average capital spending target around depreciation and amortization levels , or modestly above , due to strategic plans over the course of an economic cycle . capital spending was $ 1.6 billion in 2018 , or 118% ( 118 % ) of depreciation and amortization , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2017 , or 98% ( 98 % ) of depreciation and amortization , and $ 1.3 billion , or 110% ( 110 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2016 . across our segments , capital spending as a percentage of depreciation and amortization ranged from 69.8% ( 69.8 % ) to 132.1% ( 132.1 % ) in 2018 . the following table shows capital spending for operations by business segment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , excluding amounts related to discontinued operations of $ 111 million in 2017 and $ 107 million in 2016. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial packaging</td><td>$ 1061</td><td>$ 836</td><td>$ 832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>global cellulose fibers</td><td>183</td><td>188</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>printing papers</td><td>303</td><td>235</td><td>215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>subtotal</td><td>1547</td><td>1259</td><td>1221</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>25</td><td>21</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>capital spending</td><td>$ 1572</td><td>$ 1280</td><td>$ 1241</td></tr></table> capital expenditures in 2019 are currently expected to be about $ 1.4 billion , or 104% ( 104 % ) of depreciation and amortization , including approximately $ 400 million of strategic investments. .\nQuestion: what portion of total capital expenditures is for the industrial packaging business segment in 2018?\nAnswer: 0.67494\nQuestion: what is the capital expenditures in the industrial packaging business segment in 2018?\nAnswer: 1061.0\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "836.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10102	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 12 2014security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters we incorporate by reference in this item 12 the information relating to ownership of our common stock by certain persons contained under the headings 201ccommon stock ownership of management 201d and 201ccommon stock ownership by certain other persons 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on september 30 , 2009 . we have four compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance . the global payments inc . amended and restated 2000 long-term incentive plan , global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan , the non-employee director stock option plan , and employee stock purchase plan have been approved by security holders . the information in the table below is as of may 31 , 2009 . for more information on these plans , see note 11 to notes to consolidated financial statements . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4292668 $ 28 6570132 ( 1 ) equity compensation plans not approved by security holders: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options warrants andrights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders:</td><td>4292668</td><td>$ 28</td><td>6570132</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>4292668</td><td>$ 28</td><td>6570132</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) also includes shares of common stock available for issuance other than upon the exercise of an option , warrant or right under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan and an amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan . item 13 2014certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence we incorporate by reference in this item 13 the information regarding certain relationships and related transactions between us and some of our affiliates and the independence of our board of directors contained under the headings 201ccertain relationships and related transactions 201d and 201cother information about the board and its committees 2014director independence 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on september 30 , 2009 . item 14 2014principal accounting fees and services we incorporate by reference in this item 14 the information regarding principal accounting fees and services contained under the heading 201cauditor information 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on september 30 , 2009. .\nQuestion: what is the number of securities approved by security holders that remain to be issued in the future by the price per security?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "183963696.0" } ]
CONVFINQA835	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans' receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 1413</td><td>$ 1783</td><td>$ 3500</td><td>$ 9208</td></tr></table> money pool activity provided $ 0.4 million of entergy new orleans' operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 1.7 million in 2003 , and provided $ 5.7 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities net cash used in investing activities decreased $ 15.5 million in 2004 primarily due to capital expenditures related to a turbine inspection project at a fossil plant in 2003 and decreased customer service spending . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 23.2 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to the maturity of $ 14.9 million of other temporary investments in 2002 and increased construction expenditures due to increased customer service spending . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 7.0 million in 2004 primarily due to the costs and expenses related to refinancing $ 75 million of long-term debt in 2004 and an increase of $ 2.2 million in common stock dividends paid . net cash used in financing activities increased $ 1.5 million in 2003 primarily due to additional common stock dividends paid of $ 2.2 million . in july 2003 , entergy new orleans issued $ 30 million of 3.875% ( 3.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2008 and $ 70 million of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 . the proceeds from these issuances were used to redeem , prior to maturity , $ 30 million of 7% ( 7 % ) series first mortgage bonds due july 2008 , $ 40 million of 8% ( 8 % ) series bonds due march 2006 , and $ 30 million of 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) series first mortgage bonds due march 2004 . the issuances and redemptions are not shown on the cash flow statement because the proceeds from the issuances were placed in a trust for use in the redemptions and never held as cash by entergy new orleans . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details on long- term debt . uses of capital entergy new orleans requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. .\nQuestion: what was the total of receivables from the money pool, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.783" } ]
CONVFINQA8462	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2009 , we classified the atlantic star as held for sale and recognized a charge of $ 7.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the ship to its fair value less cost to sell based on a firm offer received during 2009 . this amount was recorded within other operating expenses in our consolidated statement of operations . we determined the fair market value of the atlantic star as of december 31 , 2010 based on comparable ship sales adjusted for the condition , age and size of the ship . we have categorized these inputs as level 3 because they are largely based on our own assump- tions . as of december 31 , 2010 , the carrying amount of the atlantic star which we still believe represents its fair value was $ 46.4 million . the following table presents a reconciliation of the company 2019s fuel call options 2019 beginning and ending balances as follows ( in thousands ) : fair value fair value measurements measurements using significant using significant unobservable unobservable year ended december 31 , 2010 inputs ( level 3 ) year ended december 31 , 2009 inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options fuel call options balance at january 1 , 2010 $ 9998 balance at january 1 , 2009 $ 2007 2007 2007 2007 2014 total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 2010 balance at january 1 2010</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 9998</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 balance at january 1 2009</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>24539</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>12536</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>-31713 ( 31713 )</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>$ 9998</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at thereporting date</td><td>$ -2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held atthe reporting date</td><td>$ -2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr></table> the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2824 ) the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2538 ) during the fourth quarter of 2010 , we changed our valuation technique for fuel call options to a market approach method which employs inputs that are observable . the fair value for fuel call options is determined by using the prevailing market price for the instruments consisting of published price quotes for similar assets based on recent transactions in an active market . we believe that level 2 categorization is appropriate due to an increase in the observability and transparency of significant inputs . previously , we derived the fair value of our fuel call options using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options 2019 contract terms and data either readily available or formulated from public market informa- tion . the fuel call options were categorized as level 3 because certain inputs , principally volatility , were unobservable . net transfers in and/or out of level 3 are reported as having occurred at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred ; therefore , gains or losses reflected in the table above for 2010 include fourth quarter fuel call option gains or losses . the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instru- ments and long-lived assets that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2010 or december 31 , 2009 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . derivative instruments we are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices . we manage these risks through a combi- nation of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies . the financial impact of these hedging instruments is pri- marily offset by corresponding changes in the under- lying exposures being hedged . we achieve this by closely matching the amount , term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged . we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes . we monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses. .\nQuestion: what was the value of purchase issuances and settlements in 2010?\nAnswer: 24539.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2009?\nAnswer: 12536.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 12003.0\nQuestion: what is the change divided by the 2009 value?\nAnswer: 0.95748\nQuestion: what is that displayed as a percent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "95.74825" } ]
CONVFINQA7796	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 26 of 100 our calculation of adjusted net earnings is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to ball corporation as reported</td><td>$ 468.0</td><td>$ 387.9</td><td>$ 319.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>74.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation activities net of tax</td><td>-9.3 ( 9.3 )</td><td>13.0</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gains and equity earnings related to acquisitions net of tax</td><td>-105.9 ( 105.9 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gain on dispositions net of tax</td><td>2212</td><td>-30.7 ( 30.7 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>debt refinancing costs net of tax</td><td>5.3</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>adjusted net earnings</td><td>$ 433.0</td><td>$ 372.4</td><td>$ 337.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>per diluted share from continuing operations as reported</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ 2.05</td><td>$ 1.62</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>per diluted share as adjusted</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.96</td><td>1.74</td></tr></table> debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2010 , increased $ 216.1 million to $ 2.8 billion from $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2009 . in december 2010 , ball replaced its senior credit facilities due october 2011 with new senior credit facilities due december 2015 . the senior credit facilities bear interest at variable rates and include a $ 200 million term a loan denominated in u.s . dollars , a a351 million term b loan denominated in british sterling and a 20ac100 million term c loan denominated in euros . the facilities also include ( 1 ) a multi-currency , long-term revolving credit facility that provides the company with up to approximately $ 850 million and ( 2 ) a french multi-currency revolving facility that provides the company with up to $ 150 million . the revolving credit facilities expire in december 2015 . in november 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 5.75 percent senior notes due in may 2021 . the net proceeds from this offering were used to repay the borrowings under our term d loan facility and for general corporate purposes . in march 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 6.75 percent senior notes due in september 2020 . on that same date , the company issued a notice of redemption to call $ 509 million in 6.875 percent senior notes due december 2012 at a redemption price of 101.146 percent of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest . the redemption of the bonds occurred on april 21 , 2010 , and resulted in a charge of $ 8.1 million for the call premium and the write off of unamortized financing costs and unamortized premiums . the charge is included in the 2010 statement of earnings as a component of interest expense . at december 31 , 2010 , approximately $ 976 million was available under the company 2019s committed multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company 2019s prc operations also had approximately $ 20 million available under a committed credit facility of approximately $ 52 million . in addition to the long-term committed credit facilities , the company had $ 372 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of 2010 , of which $ 76.2 million was outstanding and due on demand , as well as approximately $ 175 million of available borrowings under its accounts receivable securitization program . in october 2010 , the company renewed its receivables sales agreement for a period of one year . the size of the new program will vary between a maximum of $ 125 million for settlement dates in january through april and a maximum of $ 175 million for settlement dates in the remaining months . given our free cash flow projections and unused credit facilities that are available until december 2015 , our liquidity is strong and is expected to meet our ongoing operating cash flow and debt service requirements . while the recent financial and economic conditions have raised concerns about credit risk with counterparties to derivative transactions , the company mitigates its exposure by spreading the risk among various counterparties and limiting exposure to any one party . we also monitor the credit ratings of our suppliers , customers , lenders and counterparties on a regular basis . we were in compliance with all loan agreements at december 31 , 2010 , and all prior years presented , and have met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about our debt and receivables sales agreements are available in notes 12 and 6 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .\nQuestion: what was net earnings per diluted share in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.36" } ]
CONVFINQA3692	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\noperating profit for the segment decreased by 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . for the year , operating profit declines in defense more than offset an increase in civil , while operating profit at intelligence essentially was unchanged . the $ 27 million decrease in operating profit at defense primarily was attributable to a decrease in the level of favorable performance adjustments on mission and combat systems activities in 2010 . the $ 19 million increase in civil principally was due to higher volume on enterprise civilian services . operating profit for the segment decreased by 3% ( 3 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . operating profit declines in civil and intelligence partially were offset by growth in defense . the decrease of $ 29 million in civil 2019s operating profit primarily was attributable to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on enterprise civilian services programs in 2009 compared to 2008 . the decrease in operating profit of $ 27 million at intelligence mainly was due to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on security solution activities in 2009 compared to 2008 . the increase in defense 2019s operating profit of $ 29 million mainly was due to volume and improved performance in mission and combat systems . the decrease in backlog during 2010 compared to 2009 mainly was due to higher sales volume on enterprise civilian service programs at civil , including volume associated with the dris 2010 program , and mission and combat system programs at defense . backlog decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 due to u.s . government 2019s exercise of the termination for convenience clause on the tsat mission operations system ( tmos ) contract at defense , which resulted in a $ 1.6 billion reduction in orders . this decline more than offset increased orders on enterprise civilian services programs at civil . we expect is&gs will experience a low single digit percentage decrease in sales for 2011 as compared to 2010 . this decline primarily is due to completion of most of the work associated with the dris 2010 program . operating profit in 2011 is expected to decline in relationship to the decline in sales volume , while operating margins are expected to be comparable between the years . space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the design , research and development , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems , including activities related to the planned replacement of the space shuttle . government satellite programs include the advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , the mobile user objective system ( muos ) , the global positioning satellite iii ( gps iii ) system , the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , and the geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) . strategic and missile defense programs include the targets and countermeasures program and the fleet ballistic missile program . space transportation includes the nasa orion program and , through ownership interests in two joint ventures , expendable launch services ( united launch alliance , or ula ) and space shuttle processing activities for the u.s . government ( united space alliance , or usa ) . the space shuttle is expected to complete its final flight mission in 2011 and our involvement with its launch and processing activities will end at that time . space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8246</td><td>$ 8654</td><td>$ 8027</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>972</td><td>972</td><td>953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>11.2% ( 11.2 % )</td><td>11.9% ( 11.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>17800</td><td>16800</td><td>17900</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems decreased by 5% ( 5 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . sales declined in all three lines of business during the year . the $ 253 million decrease in space transportation principally was due to lower volume on the space shuttle external tank , commercial launch vehicle activity and other human space flight programs , which partially were offset by higher volume on the orion program . there were no commercial launches in 2010 compared to one commercial launch in 2009 . strategic & defensive missile systems ( s&dms ) sales declined $ 147 million principally due to lower volume on defensive missile programs . the $ 8 million sales decline in satellites primarily was attributable to lower volume on commercial satellites , which partially were offset by higher volume on government satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2010 and one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 . net sales for space systems increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . during the year , sales growth at satellites and space transportation offset a decline in s&dms . the sales growth of $ 707 million in satellites was due to higher volume in government satellite activities , which partially was offset by lower volume in commercial satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 and two deliveries in 2008 . the increase in sales of $ 21 million in space transportation primarily was due to higher volume on the orion program , which more than offset a decline in the space shuttle 2019s external tank program . there was one commercial launch in both 2009 and 2008 . s&dms 2019 sales decreased by $ 102 million mainly due to lower volume on defensive missile programs , which more than offset growth in strategic missile programs. .\nQuestion: what is the operating expense in 2009?\nAnswer: 7274.0\nQuestion: what about the net sales in 2010\nAnswer: 8654.0\nQuestion: and the operating profit in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "972.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8655	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 466.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenue</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>attala costs</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr></table> the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in \"state and local rate regulation\" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .\nQuestion: what was the change in net revenue from 2006 to 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "20.8" } ]
CONVFINQA3294	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nzimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report through february 25 , 2016 , we repurchased approximately $ 415.0 million of shares of our common stock , which includes the $ 250.0 million of shares that we repurchased from certain selling stockholders on february 10 , 2016 . in order to achieve operational synergies , we expect cash outlays related to our integration plans to be approximately $ 290.0 million in 2016 . these cash outlays are necessary to achieve our integration goals of net annual pre-tax operating profit synergies of $ 350.0 million by the end of the third year post-closing date . also as discussed in note 20 to our consolidated financial statements , as of december 31 , 2015 , a short-term liability of $ 50.0 million and long-term liability of $ 264.6 million related to durom cup product liability claims was recorded on our consolidated balance sheet . we expect to continue paying these claims over the next few years . we expect to be reimbursed a portion of these payments for product liability claims from insurance carriers . as of december 31 , 2015 , we have received a portion of the insurance proceeds we estimate we will recover . we have a long-term receivable of $ 95.3 million remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers . we also had a short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims . at december 31 , 2015 , we had ten tranches of senior notes outstanding as follows ( dollars in millions ) : principal interest rate maturity date . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>principal</td><td>interest rate</td><td>maturity date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 500.0</td><td>1.450% ( 1.450 % )</td><td>april 1 2017</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1150.0</td><td>2.000</td><td>april 1 2018</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.625</td><td>november 30 2019</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>1500.0</td><td>2.700</td><td>april 1 2020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>300.0</td><td>3.375</td><td>november 30 2021</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>750.0</td><td>3.150</td><td>april 1 2022</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2000.0</td><td>3.550</td><td>april 1 2025</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.250</td><td>august 15 2035</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>500.0</td><td>5.750</td><td>november 30 2039</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1250.0</td><td>4.450</td><td>august 15 2045</td></tr></table> we issued $ 7.65 billion of senior notes in march 2015 ( the 201cmerger notes 201d ) , the proceeds of which were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration payable in the biomet merger , pay merger related fees and expenses and pay a portion of biomet 2019s funded debt . on june 24 , 2015 , we also borrowed $ 3.0 billion on a u.s . term loan ( 201cu.s . term loan 201d ) to fund the biomet merger . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . we have a $ 4.35 billion credit agreement ( 201ccredit agreement 201d ) that contains : ( i ) a 5-year unsecured u.s . term loan facility ( 201cu.s . term loan facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 3.0 billion , and ( ii ) a 5-year unsecured multicurrency revolving facility ( 201cmulticurrency revolving facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 1.35 billion . the multicurrency revolving facility will mature in may 2019 , with two one-year extensions available at our option . borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility may be used for general corporate purposes . there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility as of december 31 , 2015 . the u.s . term loan facility will mature in june 2020 , with principal payments due beginning september 30 , 2015 , as follows : $ 75.0 million on a quarterly basis during the first three years , $ 112.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fourth year , and $ 412.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fifth year . in 2015 , we paid $ 500.0 million in principal under the u.s . term loan facility , resulting in $ 2.5 billion in outstanding borrowings as of december 31 , we and certain of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries are the borrowers under the credit agreement . borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at floating rates based upon indices determined by the currency of the borrowings plus an applicable margin determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating , or at an alternate base rate , or , in the case of borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility only , at a fixed rate determined through a competitive bid process . the credit agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for an unsecured financing arrangement , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 24 , 2016 and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement as of december 31 , 2015 . commitments under the credit agreement are subject to certain fees . on the multicurrency revolving facility , we pay a facility fee at a rate determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating . we have a japan term loan agreement with one of the lenders under the credit agreement for 11.7 billion japanese yen that will mature on may 31 , 2018 . borrowings under the japan term loan bear interest at a fixed rate of 0.61 percent per annum until maturity . we also have other available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . we place our cash and cash equivalents in highly-rated financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one entity . we invest only in high-quality financial instruments in accordance with our internal investment policy . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had short-term and long-term investments in debt securities with a fair value of $ 273.1 million . these investments are in debt securities of many different issuers and , therefore , we believe we have no significant concentration of risk with a single issuer . all of these debt securities remain highly rated and we believe the risk of default by the issuers is low. .\nQuestion: what is the short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims as a percentage of the long-term receivable remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers?\nAnswer: 0.35047\nQuestion: what is the value of outstanding borrowings, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2500.0" } ]
CONVFINQA625	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nu.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized at level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . commodities are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav.aa thenavaa valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the navaa is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the navaa is based on valuationmodels and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds forwhich thenavaa is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . there were no material contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans during 2017 . we will make contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions.as a result of these contributions , we do not expect any material qualified defined benefit cash funding will be required until 2021.we plan to fund these contributions using a mix of cash on hand and commercial paper . while we do not anticipate a need to do so , our capital structure and resources would allow us to issue new debt if circumstances change . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023 2013 2027</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 2450</td><td>$ 2480</td><td>$ 2560</td><td>$ 2630</td><td>$ 2700</td><td>$ 14200</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>820</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans wemaintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , wematchmost employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 613 million in 2017 , $ 617 million in 2016 and $ 393 million in 2015 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 35.5 million and 36.9 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016. .\nQuestion: what is the difference in employee total matching contributions in 2016?\nAnswer: 617.0\nQuestion: what about in 2015?\nAnswer: 393.0\nQuestion: what is the difference?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "224.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3597	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following is a list of distribution locations including the approximate square footage and if the location is leased or owned: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>distribution facility location</td><td>approximate square footage</td><td>owned/leased facility</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>frankfort new york ( a )</td><td>924000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>franklin kentucky</td><td>833000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pendleton indiana</td><td>764000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>macon georgia</td><td>684000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>waco texas</td><td>666000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>casa grande arizona</td><td>650000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>482000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>309000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>waverly nebraska</td><td>592000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>seguin texas ( c )</td><td>71000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>lakewood washington</td><td>64000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>longview texas ( c )</td><td>63000</td><td>owned</td></tr></table> longview , texas ( c ) 63000 owned ( a ) the frankfort , new york , distribution center began receiving merchandise in fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 , and is expected to begin shipping merchandise to stores in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 . ( b ) the leased distribution center in hagerstown is treated as an extension of the existing owned hagerstown location and is not considered a separate distribution center . ( c ) this is a mixing center designed to process certain high-volume bulk products . the company 2019s store support center occupies approximately 260000 square feet of owned building space in brentwood , tennessee , and the company 2019s merchandising innovation center occupies approximately 32000 square feet of leased building space in nashville , tennessee . the company also leases approximately 8000 square feet of building space for the petsense corporate headquarters , located in scottsdale , arizona . item 3 . legal proceedings the company is involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business . the company believes that any estimated loss related to such matters has been adequately provided for in accrued liabilities to the extent probable and reasonably estimable . accordingly , the company currently expects these matters will be resolved without material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .\nQuestion: what is the total combined square footage of the locations in seguin texas and longview texas?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "134000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6515	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations comcast corporation and subsidiaries28 comcast corporation and subsidiaries the exchangeable notes varies based upon the fair market value of the security to which it is indexed . the exchangeable notes are collateralized by our investments in cablevision , microsoft and vodafone , respectively . the comcast exchangeable notes are collateralized by our class a special common stock held in treasury . we have settled and intend in the future to settle all of the comcast exchangeable notes using cash . during 2004 and 2003 , we settled an aggregate of $ 847 million face amount and $ 638 million face amount , respectively , of our obligations relating to our notes exchangeable into comcast stock by delivering cash to the counterparty upon maturity of the instruments , and the equity collar agreements related to the underlying shares expired or were settled . during 2004 and 2003 , we settled $ 2.359 billion face amount and $ 1.213 billion face amount , respectively , of our obligations relating to our exchangeable notes by delivering the underlying shares of common stock to the counterparty upon maturity of the investments . as of december 31 , 2004 , our debt includes an aggregate of $ 1.699 billion of exchangeable notes , including $ 1.645 billion within current portion of long-term debt . as of december 31 , 2004 , the securities we hold collateralizing the exchangeable notes were sufficient to substantially satisfy the debt obligations associated with the outstanding exchangeable notes . stock repurchases . during 2004 , under our board-authorized , $ 2 billion share repurchase program , we repurchased 46.9 million shares of our class a special common stock for $ 1.328 billion . we expect such repurchases to continue from time to time in the open market or in private transactions , subject to market conditions . refer to notes 8 and 10 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our financing activities . investing activities net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations was $ 4.512 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , and consists primarily of capital expenditures of $ 3.660 billion , additions to intangible and other noncurrent assets of $ 628 million and the acquisition of techtv for approximately $ 300 million . capital expenditures . our most significant recurring investing activity has been and is expected to continue to be capital expendi- tures . the following table illustrates the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable segment during 2004 and expect to incur in 2005 ( dollars in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deployment of cable modems digital converters and new service offerings</td><td>$ 2106</td><td>$ 2300</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>upgrading of cable systems</td><td>902</td><td>200</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recurring capital projects</td><td>614</td><td>500</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total cable segment capital expenditures</td><td>$ 3622</td><td>$ 3000</td></tr></table> the amount of our capital expenditures for 2005 and for subsequent years will depend on numerous factors , some of which are beyond our control , including competition , changes in technology and the timing and rate of deployment of new services . additions to intangibles . additions to intangibles during 2004 primarily relate to our investment in a $ 250 million long-term strategic license agreement with gemstar , multiple dwelling unit contracts of approximately $ 133 million and other licenses and software intangibles of approximately $ 168 million . investments . proceeds from sales , settlements and restructurings of investments totaled $ 228 million during 2004 , related to the sales of our non-strategic investments , including our 20% ( 20 % ) interest in dhc ventures , llc ( discovery health channel ) for approximately $ 149 million . we consider investments that we determine to be non-strategic , highly-valued , or both to be a source of liquidity . we consider our investment in $ 1.5 billion in time warner common-equivalent preferred stock to be an anticipated source of liquidity . we do not have any significant contractual funding commitments with respect to any of our investments . refer to notes 6 and 7 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our investments and our intangible assets , respectively . off-balance sheet arrangements we do not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition , results of operations , liquidity , capital expenditures or capital resources. .\nQuestion: what was the value of the long-term strategic license agreement with gemstar?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "250.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9264	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npurchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2014, what percentage of the total sales was due to intersegment ones?\nAnswer: 0.02455\nQuestion: and how much did the alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in that year represent in relation to the one in 2015?\nAnswer: 1.06517\nQuestion: what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2015 average realized price?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.06517" } ]
CONVFINQA5902	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nasset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .\nQuestion: what was the level 3 balance at the end of 2018?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "230.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1351	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n9 . junior subordinated debt securities payable in accordance with the provisions of the junior subordinated debt securities which were issued on march 29 , 2004 , holdings elected to redeem the $ 329897 thousand of 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) junior subordinated debt securities outstanding on may 24 , 2013 . as a result of the early redemption , the company incurred pre-tax expense of $ 7282 thousand related to the immediate amortization of the remaining capitalized issuance costs on the trust preferred securities . interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense incurred</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 8181</td></tr></table> holdings considered the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities , taken together , constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by holdings of capital trust ii 2019s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities . 10 . reinsurance and trust agreements certain subsidiaries of group have established trust agreements , which effectively use the company 2019s investments as collateral , as security for assumed losses payable to certain non-affiliated ceding companies . at december 31 , 2015 , the total amount on deposit in trust accounts was $ 454384 thousand . on april 24 , 2014 , the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re limited ( 201ckilimanjaro 201d ) , a bermuda based special purpose reinsurer , to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover specified named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 250000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeastern united states . the second agreement provides up to $ 200000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic and northeast regions of the united states and puerto rico as well as reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic , northeast and west regions of the united states , puerto rico and british columbia . on november 18 , 2014 , the company entered into a collateralized reinsurance agreement with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . this agreement is a multi-year reinsurance contract which covers specified earthquake events . the agreement provides up to $ 500000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . on december 1 , 2015 the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 300000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms and earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . the second agreement provides up to $ 325000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms and earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . kilimanjaro has financed the various property catastrophe reinsurance coverage by issuing catastrophe bonds to unrelated , external investors . on april 24 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 450000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2014-1 notes 201d ) . on november 18 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 500000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2014-2 notes 201d ) . on december 1 , 2015 , kilimanjaro issued $ 625000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2015-1 notes ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the series 2014-1 notes , the series 2014-2 notes and the series 2015-1 notes are held in reinsurance trust throughout the duration of the applicable reinsurance agreements and invested solely in us government money market funds with a rating of at least 201caaam 201d by standard & poor 2019s. .\nQuestion: what was the total value of the notes issued by kilimanjaro in 2014?\nAnswer: 950000.0\nQuestion: including the notes issued in 2015, what becomes this total for the two years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1575000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6774	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbacklog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions except percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>silicon systems</td><td>$ 1720</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td><td>$ 1400</td><td>48% ( 48 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>applied global services</td><td>812</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>775</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>display</td><td>525</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td><td>593</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy and environmental solutions</td><td>85</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>149</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3142</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 2917</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .\nQuestion: what was the silicon systems revenue for 2015?\nAnswer: 1720.0\nQuestion: and for 2014?\nAnswer: 1400.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference between these two years?\nAnswer: 320.0\nQuestion: so what was the growth rate for this segment during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.22857" } ]
CONVFINQA6103	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured . both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective . our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing , remaining developmental effort , operational performance including company- specific synergies , aftermarket retention , product life cycles , material and labor pricing , and other relevant customer , contractual and market factors . where appropriate , the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions , as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation . the adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate . projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets , liabilities , or a group of assets and liabilities . valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for property , plant and equipment . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $ 2.8 billion of goodwill , all of which is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes . substantially all of the goodwill was assigned to our rms business . the goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of our products and technologies with those of sikorsky , costs synergies resulting from the consolidation or elimination of certain functions , and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition , such as the assembled workforce of sikorsky . determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the exercise of significant judgments , including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows , long-term growth rates and discount rates . the cash flows employed in the dcf analyses are based on our best estimate of future sales , earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions , customer budgets , existing firm orders , expected future orders , contracts with suppliers , labor agreements , changes in working capital , long term business plans and recent operating performance . use of different estimates and judgments could yield different results . impact to 2015 financial results sikorsky 2019s 2015 financial results have been included in our consolidated financial results only for the period from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 . as a result , our consolidated financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2015 do not reflect a full year of sikorsky 2019s results . from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 , sikorsky generated net sales of approximately $ 400 million and operating loss of approximately $ 45 million , inclusive of intangible amortization and adjustments required to account for the acquisition . we incurred approximately $ 38 million of non-recoverable transaction costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition in 2015 that were expensed as incurred . these costs are included in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . we also incurred approximately $ 48 million in costs associated with issuing the $ 7.0 billion november 2015 notes used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility used to finance the acquisition . the financing costs were recorded as a reduction of debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt . supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire years in 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 45366</td><td>$ 47369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>3534</td><td>3475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per common share</td><td>11.39</td><td>10.97</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>11.23</td><td>10.78</td></tr></table> the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorsky with pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2014 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these .\nQuestion: what is the net sales in 2015?\nAnswer: 45366.0\nQuestion: what about in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "47369.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2713	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 59 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 13 . debt and interest costs ( continued ) long-term debt obligations outstanding at december 31 , 2007 , have maturities of $ 127.1 million , $ 160 million , $ 388.4 million , $ 625.1 million and $ 550.3 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and $ 456.1 million thereafter . ball provides letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure liabilities recorded in connection with industrial development revenue bonds and certain self-insurance arrangements . letters of credit outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 41 million and $ 52.4 million , respectively . the notes payable and senior credit facilities are guaranteed on a full , unconditional and joint and several basis by certain of the company 2019s domestic wholly owned subsidiaries . certain foreign denominated tranches of the senior credit facilities are similarly guaranteed by certain of the company 2019s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries . note 22 contains further details as well as condensed , consolidating financial information for the company , segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments , share repurchases , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . on march 27 , 2006 , ball expanded its senior secured credit facilities with the addition of a $ 500 million term d loan facility due in installments through october 2011 . also on march 27 , 2006 , ball issued at a price of 99.799 percent $ 450 million of 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) senior notes ( effective yield to maturity of 6.65 percent ) due in march 2018 . the proceeds from these financings were used to refinance existing u.s . can debt with ball corporation debt at lower interest rates , acquire certain north american plastic container net assets from alcan and reduce seasonal working capital debt . ( see note 3 for further details of the acquisitions. ) on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities to extend debt maturities at lower interest rate spreads and provide the company with additional borrowing capacity for future growth . during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due in august 2006 . the refinancing and senior note redemptions resulted in a debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) for the related call premium and unamortized debt issuance costs . a summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest costs before refinancing costs</td><td>$ 155.8</td><td>$ 142.5</td><td>$ 102.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt refinancing costs</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>19.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total interest costs</td><td>155.8</td><td>142.5</td><td>121.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amounts capitalized</td><td>-6.4 ( 6.4 )</td><td>-8.1 ( 8.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>interest expense</td><td>$ 149.4</td><td>$ 134.4</td><td>$ 116.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest paid during the year ( a )</td><td>$ 153.9</td><td>$ 125.4</td><td>$ 138.5</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 6.6 million paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of the company 2019s senior and senior subordinated notes. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in interest expense between 2005 and 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "18.0" } ]
CONVFINQA985	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy mississippi may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy mississippi require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its corporate charter , bond indenture , and other agreements . a0 a0entergy mississippi has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 1633</td><td>$ 10595</td><td>$ 25930</td><td>$ 644</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy mississippi has four separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $ 102.5 million scheduled to expire may 2018 . no borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of december a031 , 2017 . a0 a0in addition , entergy mississippi is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . as of december a031 , 2017 , a $ 15.3 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy mississippi 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy mississippi obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 175 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings and security issuances . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy mississippi 2019s short-term borrowing limits . entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery the rates that entergy mississippi charges for electricity significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy mississippi is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the mpsc , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . formula rate plan in march 2016 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2016 test year filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s projected earned return for the 2016 calendar year to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth . the filing showed a $ 32.6 million rate increase was necessary to reset entergy mississippi 2019s earned return on common equity to the specified point of adjustment of 9.96% ( 9.96 % ) , within the formula rate plan bandwidth . in june 2016 the mpsc approved entergy mississippi 2019s joint stipulation with the mississippi public utilities staff . the joint stipulation provided for a total revenue increase of $ 23.7 million . the revenue increase includes a $ 19.4 million increase through the formula rate plan , resulting in a return on common equity point of adjustment of 10.07% ( 10.07 % ) . the revenue increase also includes $ 4.3 million in incremental ad valorem tax expenses to be collected through an updated ad valorem tax adjustment rider . the revenue increase and ad valorem tax adjustment rider were effective with the july 2016 bills . in march 2017 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2017 test year filing and 2016 look-back filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s earned return for the historical 2016 calendar year and projected earned return for the 2017 calendar year to be within the formula rate plan bandwidth , resulting in no change in rates . in june 2017 , entergy mississippi and the mississippi public utilities staff entered into a stipulation that confirmed that entergy .\nQuestion: what is the entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1633.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8940	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of a liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and political and economic conditions in certain countries . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company- specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons ( overnight , one week , two weeks , one month , three months , one year ) and over a variety of stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains a series of contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal measures that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . in december 2016 , the federal reserve board adopted final rules which require additional disclosures relating to the lcr of large financial institutions , including citi . among other things , the final rules require citi to disclose components of its average hqla , lcr and inflows and outflows each quarter . in addition , the final rules require disclosure of citi 2019s calculation of the maturity mismatch add-on as well as other qualitative disclosures . the effective date for these disclosures is april 1 , 2017 . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td><td>sept . 30 2016</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 403.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td><td>$ 389.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>332.5</td><td>335.3</td><td>344.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>113% ( 113 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 71.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 44.8</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased both year-over-year and sequentially . the increase year-over-year was driven by both an increase in hqla and a reduction in net outflows . sequentially , the increase was driven by a slight reduction in net outflows , as hqla remained largely unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in the second quarter of 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . standardized weightings would be required to be applied to the various asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2016 , it will need to evaluate any final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2017 . the proposed rules would require full implementation of the u.s . nsfr beginning january 1 , 2018. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the lcr from 2014 to 2016?\nAnswer: 8.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.0708\nQuestion: what is the net outflows\tin 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "332.5" } ]
CONVFINQA4656	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s . dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>october 30 2010</td><td>october 31 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value of forward exchange contracts asset</td><td>$ 7256</td><td>$ 8367</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset</td><td>$ 22062</td><td>$ 20132</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability</td><td>$ -7396 ( 7396 )</td><td>$ -6781 ( 6781 )</td></tr></table> fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22062 $ 20132 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 7396 ) $ ( 6781 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s . dollar . in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive . our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .\nQuestion: what was the fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates in 2010?\nAnswer: 22062.0\nQuestion: what was the fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates in 2009?\nAnswer: 20132.0\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\nAnswer: 1930.0\nQuestion: what was the fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "20132.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2227	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\napple inc . \| 2016 form 10-k \| 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 24 , 2016 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 23 , 2011 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2016 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september2011</td><td>september2012</td><td>september2013</td><td>september2014</td><td>september2015</td><td>september2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 123</td><td>$ 183</td><td>$ 212</td><td>$ 213</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 155</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 185</td><td>$ 213</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p information technology index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 142</td><td>$ 183</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 230</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones u.s . technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 217</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of apple inc. in 2014?\nAnswer: 183.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013?\nAnswer: 123.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in value from 2013 to 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "60.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4679	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nzimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2018 form 10-k annual report ( 8 ) we have incurred other various expenses from specific events or projects that we consider highly variable or have a significant impact to our operating results that we have excluded from our non-gaap financial measures . this includes legal entity and operational restructuring as well as our costs of complying with our dpa with the u.s . government related to certain fcpa matters involving biomet and certain of its subsidiaries . under the dpa , which has a three-year term , we are subject to oversight by an independent compliance monitor , which monitorship commenced in july 2017 . the excluded costs include the fees paid to the independent compliance monitor and to external legal counsel assisting in the matter . ( 9 ) represents the tax effects on the previously specified items . the tax effect for the u.s . jurisdiction is calculated based on an effective rate considering federal and state taxes , as well as permanent items . for jurisdictions outside the u.s. , the tax effect is calculated based upon the statutory rates where the items were incurred . ( 10 ) the 2016 period includes negative effects from finalizing the tax accounts for the biomet merger . under the applicable u.s . gaap rules , these measurement period adjustments are recognized on a prospective basis in the period of change . ( 11 ) the 2017 tax act resulted in a net favorable provisional adjustment due to the reduction of deferred tax liabilities for unremitted earnings and revaluation of deferred tax liabilities to a 21 percent rate , which was partially offset by provisional tax charges related to the toll charge provision of the 2017 tax act . in 2018 , we finalized our estimates of the effects of the 2017 tax act based upon final guidance issued by u.s . tax authorities . ( 12 ) other certain tax adjustments in 2018 primarily related to changes in tax rates on deferred tax liabilities recorded on intangible assets recognized in acquisition-related accounting and adjustments from internal restructuring transactions that provide us access to offshore funds in a tax efficient manner . in 2017 , other certain tax adjustments relate to tax benefits from lower tax rates unrelated to the impact of the 2017 tax act , net favorable resolutions of various tax matters and net favorable adjustments from internal restructuring transactions . the 2016 adjustment primarily related to a favorable adjustment to certain deferred tax liabilities recognized as part of acquisition-related accounting and favorable resolution of certain tax matters with taxing authorities offset by internal restructuring transactions that provide us access to offshore funds in a tax efficient manner . ( 13 ) diluted share count used in adjusted diluted eps : year ended december 31 , 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year endeddecember 31 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>diluted shares</td><td>203.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dilutive shares assuming net earnings</td><td>1.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>adjusted diluted shares</td><td>205.0</td></tr></table> liquidity and capital resources cash flows provided by operating activities were $ 1747.4 million in 2018 compared to $ 1582.3 million and $ 1632.2 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the increase in operating cash flows in 2018 compared to 2017 was driven by additional cash flows from our sale of accounts receivable in certain countries , lower acquisition and integration expenses and lower quality remediation expenses , as well as certain significant payments made in the 2017 period . in the 2017 period , we made payments related to the u.s . durom cup settlement program , and we paid $ 30.5 million in settlement payments to resolve previously-disclosed fcpa matters involving biomet and certain of its subsidiaries as discussed in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . the decline in operating cash flows in 2017 compared to 2016 was driven by additional investments in inventory , additional expenses for quality remediation and the significant payments made in the 2017 period as discussed in the previous sentence . these unfavorable items were partially offset by $ 174.0 million of incremental cash flows in 2017 from our sale of accounts receivable in certain countries . cash flows used in investing activities were $ 416.6 million in 2018 compared to $ 510.8 million and $ 1691.5 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . instrument and property , plant and equipment additions reflected ongoing investments in our product portfolio and optimization of our manufacturing and logistics network . in 2018 , we entered into receive-fixed-rate , pay-fixed-rate cross-currency interest rate swaps . our investing cash flows reflect the net cash inflows from the fixed- rate interest rate receipts/payments , as well as the termination of certain of these swaps that were in a gain position in the year . the 2016 period included cash outflows for the acquisition of ldr holding corporation ( 201cldr 201d ) and other business acquisitions . additionally , the 2016 period reflects the maturity of available-for-sale debt securities . as these investments matured , we used the cash to pay off debt and have not reinvested in any additional debt securities . cash flows used in financing activities were $ 1302.2 million in 2018 . our primary use of available cash in 2018 was for debt repayment . we received net proceeds of $ 749.5 million from the issuance of additional senior notes and borrowed $ 400.0 million from our multicurrency revolving facility to repay $ 1150.0 million of senior notes that became due on april 2 , 2018 . we subsequently repaid the $ 400.0 million of multicurrency revolving facility borrowings . also in 2018 , we borrowed another $ 675.0 million under a new u.s . term loan c and used the cash proceeds along with cash generated from operations throughout the year to repay an aggregate of $ 835.0 million on u.s . term loan a , $ 450.0 million on u.s . term loan b , and we subsequently repaid $ 140.0 million on u.s . term loan c . overall , we had approximately $ 1150 million of net principal repayments on our senior notes and term loans in 2018 . in 2017 , our primary use of available cash was also for debt repayment compared to 2016 when we were not able to repay as much debt due to financing requirements to complete the ldr and other business acquisitions . additionally in 2017 , we had net cash inflows of $ 103.5 million on factoring programs that had not been remitted to the third party . in 2018 , we had net cash outflows related to these factoring programs as we remitted the $ 103.5 million and collected only $ 66.8 million which had not yet been remitted by the end of the year . since our factoring programs started at the end of 2016 , we did not have similar cash flows in that year . in january 2019 , we borrowed an additional $ 200.0 million under u.s . term loan c and used those proceeds , along with cash on hand , to repay the remaining $ 225.0 million outstanding under u.s . term loan b . in february , may , august and december 2018 , our board of directors declared cash dividends of $ 0.24 per share . we expect to continue paying cash dividends on a quarterly basis ; however , future dividends are subject to approval of the board of directors and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . as further discussed in note 11 to our consolidated financial statements , our debt facilities restrict the payment of dividends in certain circumstances. .\nQuestion: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2017?\nAnswer: 1582.3\nQuestion: and in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1632.2" } ]
CONVFINQA2478	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . 2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2246.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>180.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>39.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision</td><td>-32.0 ( 32.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>miso deferral</td><td>-32.0 ( 32.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>7.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 2408.8</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 . entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2014?\nAnswer: 162.7\nQuestion: and what was the net revenue in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2246.1" } ]
CONVFINQA6675	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nzimmer holdings , inc . 2013 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) fees paid to collaborative partners . where contingent milestone payments are due to third parties under research and development arrangements , the milestone payment obligations are expensed when the milestone results are achieved . litigation 2013 we record a liability for contingent losses , including future legal costs , settlements and judgments , when we consider it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . special items 2013 we recognize expenses resulting directly from our business combinations , employee termination benefits , certain r&d agreements , certain contract terminations , consulting and professional fees and asset impairment or loss on disposal charges connected with global restructuring , operational and quality excellence initiatives , and other items as 201cspecial items 201d in our consolidated statement of earnings . 201cspecial items 201d included ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>impairment/loss on disposal of assets</td><td>$ 10.9</td><td>$ 14.6</td><td>$ 8.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>consulting and professional fees</td><td>99.1</td><td>90.1</td><td>26.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>employee severance and retention including share-based compensation acceleration</td><td>14.2</td><td>8.2</td><td>23.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dedicated project personnel</td><td>34.0</td><td>15.1</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>certain r&d agreements</td><td>0.8</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>relocated facilities</td><td>3.6</td><td>1.8</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>distributor acquisitions</td><td>0.4</td><td>0.8</td><td>2.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>certain litigation matters</td><td>26.9</td><td>13.7</td><td>0.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>contract terminations</td><td>3.9</td><td>6.6</td><td>6.3</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>contingent consideration adjustments</td><td>9.0</td><td>-2.8 ( 2.8 )</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>accelerated software amortization</td><td>6.0</td><td>4.5</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>other</td><td>7.9</td><td>2.8</td><td>6.1</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>special items</td><td>$ 216.7</td><td>$ 155.4</td><td>$ 75.2</td></tr></table> impairment/ loss on disposal of assets relates to impairment of intangible assets that were acquired in business combinations or impairment of or a loss on the disposal of other assets . consulting and professional fees relate to third-party consulting , professional fees and contract labor related to our quality and operational excellence initiatives , third-party consulting fees related to certain information system implementations , third-party integration consulting performed in a variety of areas such as tax , compliance , logistics and human resources for our business combinations , third-party fees related to severance and termination benefits matters and legal fees related to certain product liability matters . our quality and operational excellence initiatives are company- wide and include improvements in quality , distribution , sourcing , manufacturing and information technology , among other areas . in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we eliminated positions as we reduced management layers , restructured certain areas , announced closures of certain facilities , and commenced initiatives to focus on business opportunities that best support our strategic priorities . in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately 170 , 400 and 500 positions , respectively , from across the globe were affected by these actions . as a result of these changes in our work force and headcount reductions in connection with acquisitions , we incurred expenses related to severance benefits , redundant salaries as we worked through transition periods , share-based compensation acceleration and other employee termination-related costs . the majority of these termination benefits were provided in accordance with our existing or local government policies and are considered ongoing benefits . these costs were accrued when they became probable and estimable and were recorded as part of other current liabilities . the majority of these costs were paid during the year they were incurred . dedicated project personnel expenses include the salary , benefits , travel expenses and other costs directly associated with employees who are 100 percent dedicated to our operational and quality excellence initiatives or integration of acquired businesses . certain r&d agreements relate to agreements with upfront payments to obtain intellectual property to be used in r&d projects that have no alternative future use in other projects . relocated facilities expenses are the moving costs and the lease expenses incurred during the relocation period in connection with relocating certain facilities . over the past few years we have acquired a number of u.s . and foreign-based distributors . we have incurred various costs related to the consummation and integration of those businesses . certain litigation matters relate to costs and adjustments recognized during the year for the estimated or actual settlement of various legal matters , including royalty disputes , patent litigation matters , commercial litigation matters and matters arising from our acquisitions of certain competitive distributorships in prior years . contract termination costs relate to terminated agreements in connection with the integration of acquired companies and changes to our distribution model as part of business restructuring and operational excellence initiatives . the terminated contracts primarily relate to sales agents and distribution agreements . contingent consideration adjustments represent the changes in the fair value of contingent consideration obligations to be paid to the prior owners of acquired businesses . accelerated software amortization is the incremental amortization resulting from a reduction in the estimated life of certain software . in 2012 , we approved a plan to replace certain software . as a result , the estimated economic useful life of the existing software was decreased to represent the period of time expected to implement replacement software . as a result , the amortization from the shortened life of this software is substantially higher than the previous amortization being recognized . cash and cash equivalents 2013 we consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in accelerated software amortization from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: 1.5\nQuestion: what is that divided by the 2012 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.33333" } ]
CONVFINQA10584	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of certain of its assets and liabilities under its interest rate swap agreements held as of december 31 , 2006 and entered into during the first half of 2007 . in addition , the company paid $ 8.0 million related to a treasury rate lock agreement entered into and settled during the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the cost of the treasury rate lock is being recognized as additional interest expense over the 10-year term of the 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) notes . during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company also received $ 3.1 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under ten forward starting interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 1.4 billion , which were designated as cash flow hedges to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the certificates issued in the securitization in may 2007 . the settlement is being recognized as a reduction in interest expense over the five-year period for which the interest rate swaps were designated as hedges . the company also received $ 17.0 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under thirteen additional interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 850.0 million that managed exposure to variability of interest rates under the credit facilities but were not considered cash flow hedges for accounting purposes . this gain is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , other comprehensive ( loss ) income included the following items related to derivative financial instruments ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax</td><td>$ -4332 ( 4332 )</td><td>$ -4901 ( 4901 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred gain on the settlement of interest rate swap agreements entered into in connection with the securitization net oftax</td><td>1238</td><td>1636</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax</td><td>-16349 ( 16349 )</td><td>-486 ( 486 )</td></tr></table> during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss of approximately $ 15.8 million and $ 3.2 million , respectively ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 10.2 million and $ 2.0 million , respectively ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified an aggregate of $ 0.1 million and $ 6.2 million , respectively ( net of an income tax provision of $ 2.0 million and an income tax benefit of $ 3.3 million , respectively ) into results of operations . 9 . fair valuemeasurements the company determines the fair market values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in sfas no . 157 , which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value . the standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value . level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date . the company 2019s level 1 assets consist of available-for-sale securities traded on active markets as well as certain brazilian treasury securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets . level 2 observable inputs other than level 1 prices , such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities ; quoted prices in markets that are not active ; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2008, what was the aggregate net unrealized loss, including the net of a tax provision?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "26.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3074	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis the risk committee of the board and the risk governance committee ( through delegated authority from the firmwide risk committee ) approve market risk limits and sub-limits at firmwide , business and product levels , consistent with our risk appetite statement . in addition , market risk management ( through delegated authority from the risk governance committee ) sets market risk limits and sub-limits at certain product and desk levels . the purpose of the firmwide limits is to assist senior management in controlling our overall risk profile . sub-limits are set below the approved level of risk limits . sub-limits set the desired maximum amount of exposure that may be managed by any particular business on a day-to-day basis without additional levels of senior management approval , effectively leaving day-to-day decisions to individual desk managers and traders . accordingly , sub-limits are a management tool designed to ensure appropriate escalation rather than to establish maximum risk tolerance . sub-limits also distribute risk among various businesses in a manner that is consistent with their level of activity and client demand , taking into account the relative performance of each area . our market risk limits are monitored daily by market risk management , which is responsible for identifying and escalating , on a timely basis , instances where limits have been exceeded . when a risk limit has been exceeded ( e.g. , due to positional changes or changes in market conditions , such as increased volatilities or changes in correlations ) , it is escalated to senior managers in market risk management and/or the appropriate risk committee . such instances are remediated by an inventory reduction and/or a temporary or permanent increase to the risk limit . model review and validation our var and stress testing models are regularly reviewed by market risk management and enhanced in order to incorporate changes in the composition of positions included in our market risk measures , as well as variations in market conditions . prior to implementing significant changes to our assumptions and/or models , model risk management performs model validations . significant changes to our var and stress testing models are reviewed with our chief risk officer and chief financial officer , and approved by the firmwide risk committee . see 201cmodel risk management 201d for further information about the review and validation of these models . systems we have made a significant investment in technology to monitor market risk including : 2030 an independent calculation of var and stress measures ; 2030 risk measures calculated at individual position levels ; 2030 attribution of risk measures to individual risk factors of each position ; 2030 the ability to report many different views of the risk measures ( e.g. , by desk , business , product type or entity ) ; 2030 the ability to produce ad hoc analyses in a timely manner . metrics we analyze var at the firmwide level and a variety of more detailed levels , including by risk category , business , and region . the tables below present average daily var and period-end var , as well as the high and low var for the period . diversification effect in the tables below represents the difference between total var and the sum of the vars for the four risk categories . this effect arises because the four market risk categories are not perfectly correlated . the table below presents average daily var by risk category. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2017</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates</td><td>$ 40</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity prices</td><td>24</td><td>25</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currency rates</td><td>12</td><td>21</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodity prices</td><td>13</td><td>17</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>diversification effect</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-45 ( 45 )</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 76</td></tr></table> our average daily var decreased to $ 54 million in 2017 from $ 63 million in 2016 , due to reductions across all risk categories , partially offset by a decrease in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was primarily due to lower levels of volatility . our average daily var decreased to $ 63 million in 2016 from $ 76 million in 2015 , due to reductions across all risk categories , partially offset by a decrease in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was primarily due to reduced exposures . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 91 .\nQuestion: what was the change in interest rates from 2016 to 2017?\nAnswer: -5.0\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.11111" } ]
CONVFINQA9811	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsolidated income statement review net income for 2009 was $ 2.4 billion and for 2008 was $ 914 million . amounts for 2009 include operating results of national city and the fourth quarter impact of a $ 687 million after-tax gain related to blackrock 2019s acquisition of bgi . increases in income statement comparisons to 2008 , except as noted , are primarily due to the operating results of national city . our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 dollars in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 9083</td><td>$ 3854</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.82% ( 3.82 % )</td><td>3.37% ( 3.37 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see statistical information 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest ( unaudited ) income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 of this report for additional information . higher net interest income for 2009 compared with 2008 reflected the increase in average interest-earning assets due to national city and the improvement in the net interest margin . the net interest margin was 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) for 2009 and 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) for 2008 . the following factors impacted the comparison : 2022 a decrease in the rate accrued on interest-bearing liabilities of 97 basis points . the rate accrued on interest-bearing deposits , the largest component , decreased 107 basis points . 2022 these factors were partially offset by a 45 basis point decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets . the yield on loans , which represented the largest portion of our earning assets in 2009 , decreased 30 basis points . 2022 in addition , the impact of noninterest-bearing sources of funding decreased 7 basis points . for comparing to the broader market , the average federal funds rate was .16% ( .16 % ) for 2009 compared with 1.94% ( 1.94 % ) for 2008 . we expect our net interest income for 2010 will likely be modestly lower as a result of cash recoveries on purchased impaired loans in 2009 and additional run-off of higher- yielding assets , which could be mitigated by rising interest rates . this assumes our current expectations for interest rates and economic conditions 2013 we include our current economic assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements in the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information section of this item 7 . noninterest income summary noninterest income was $ 7.1 billion for 2009 and $ 2.4 billion for 2008 . noninterest income for 2009 included the following : 2022 the gain on blackrock/bgi transaction of $ 1.076 billion , 2022 net credit-related other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) on debt and equity securities of $ 577 million , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 550 million , 2022 gains on hedging of residential mortgage servicing rights of $ 355 million , 2022 valuation and sale income related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 107 million , 2022 gains of $ 103 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment in the first quarter , and net losses on private equity and alternative investments of $ 93 million . noninterest income for 2008 included the following : 2022 net otti on debt and equity securities of $ 312 million , 2022 gains of $ 246 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment , 2022 valuation and sale losses related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 197 million , 2022 impairment and other losses related to private equity and alternative investments of $ 180 million , 2022 income from hilliard lyons totaling $ 164 million , including the first quarter gain of $ 114 million from the sale of this business , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 106 million , and 2022 a gain of $ 95 million related to the redemption of a portion of our visa class b common shares related to visa 2019s march 2008 initial public offering . additional analysis asset management revenue increased $ 172 million to $ 858 million in 2009 , compared with $ 686 million in 2008 . this increase reflected improving equity markets , new business generation and a shift in assets into higher yielding equity investments during the second half of 2009 . assets managed totaled $ 103 billion at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , including the impact of national city . the asset management group section of the business segments review section of this item 7 includes further discussion of assets under management . consumer services fees totaled $ 1.290 billion in 2009 compared with $ 623 million in 2008 . service charges on deposits totaled $ 950 million for 2009 and $ 372 million for 2008 . both increases were primarily driven by the impact of the national city acquisition . reduced consumer spending .\nQuestion: how much did the net interest income in 2009 represent in relation to the one in 2008?\nAnswer: 2.35677\nQuestion: and what was that ratio for the asset management revenue in those same years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.25073" } ]
CONVFINQA6776	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value change in citi common stock between 2010 and 2015?\nAnswer: 10.14\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.1014" } ]
CONVFINQA10198	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsources of blackrock 2019s operating cash primarily include investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue , performance fees , revenue from technology and risk management services , advisory and other revenue and distribution fees . blackrock uses its cash to pay all operating expense , interest and principal on borrowings , income taxes , dividends on blackrock 2019s capital stock , repurchases of the company 2019s stock , capital expenditures and purchases of co-investments and seed investments . for details of the company 2019s gaap cash flows from operating , investing and financing activities , see the consolidated statements of cash flows contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing . cash flows from operating activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , primarily include the receipt of investment advisory and administration fees , securities lending revenue and performance fees offset by the payment of operating expenses incurred in the normal course of business , including year-end incentive compensation accrued for in the prior year . cash outflows from investing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 517 million and primarily reflected $ 497 million of investment purchases , $ 155 million of purchases of property and equipment , $ 73 million related to the first reserve transaction and $ 29 million related to the cachematrix transaction , partially offset by $ 205 million of net proceeds from sales and maturities of certain investments . cash outflows from financing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 3094 million , primarily resulting from $ 1.4 billion of share repurchases , including $ 1.1 billion in open market- transactions and $ 321 million of employee tax withholdings related to employee stock transactions , $ 1.7 billion of cash dividend payments and $ 700 million of repayments of long- term borrowings , partially offset by $ 697 million of proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings . the company manages its financial condition and funding to maintain appropriate liquidity for the business . liquidity resources at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) december 31 , december 31 , cash and cash equivalents ( 1 ) $ 6894 $ 6091 cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 ) ( 63 ) ( 53 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents ( 1 )</td><td>$ 6894</td><td>$ 6091</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 )</td><td>-63 ( 63 )</td><td>-53 ( 53 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>subtotal</td><td>6831</td><td>6038</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit facility 2014 undrawn</td><td>4000</td><td>4000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total liquidity resources ( 3 )</td><td>$ 10831</td><td>$ 10038</td></tr></table> total liquidity resources ( 3 ) $ 10831 $ 10038 ( 1 ) the percentage of cash and cash equivalents held by the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries was approximately 40% ( 40 % ) and 50% ( 50 % ) at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . see net capital requirements herein for more information on net capital requirements in certain regulated subsidiaries . ( 2 ) the company cannot readily access such cash to use in its operating activities . ( 3 ) amounts do not reflect a reduction for year-end incentive compensation accruals of approximately $ 1.5 billion and $ 1.3 billion for 2017 and 2016 , respectively , which are paid in the first quarter of the following year . total liquidity resources increased $ 793 million during 2017 , primarily reflecting cash flows from operating activities , partially offset by cash payments of 2016 year-end incentive awards , share repurchases of $ 1.4 billion and cash dividend payments of $ 1.7 billion . a significant portion of the company 2019s $ 3154 million of total investments , as adjusted , is illiquid in nature and , as such , cannot be readily convertible to cash . share repurchases . the company repurchased 2.6 million common shares in open market transactions under the share repurchase program for approximately $ 1.1 billion during 2017 . at december 31 , 2017 , there were 6.4 million shares still authorized to be repurchased . net capital requirements . the company is required to maintain net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries within a number of jurisdictions , which is partially maintained by retaining cash and cash equivalent investments in those subsidiaries or jurisdictions . as a result , such subsidiaries of the company may be restricted in their ability to transfer cash between different jurisdictions and to their parents . additionally , transfers of cash between international jurisdictions may have adverse tax consequences that could discourage such transfers . blackrock institutional trust company , n.a . ( 201cbtc 201d ) is chartered as a national bank that does not accept client deposits and whose powers are limited to trust and other fiduciary activities . btc provides investment management services , including investment advisory and securities lending agency services , to institutional clients . btc is subject to regulatory capital and liquid asset requirements administered by the office of the comptroller of the currency . at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company was required to maintain approximately $ 1.8 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively , in net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries , including btc , entities regulated by the financial conduct authority and prudential regulation authority in the united kingdom , and the company 2019s broker-dealers . the company was in compliance with all applicable regulatory net capital requirements . undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries . as a result of the 2017 tax act and the one-time mandatory deemed repatriation tax on untaxed accumulated foreign earnings , a provisional amount of u.s . income taxes was provided on the undistributed foreign earnings . the financial statement basis in excess of tax basis of its foreign subsidiaries remains indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations . the company will continue to evaluate its capital management plans throughout 2018 . short-term borrowings 2017 revolving credit facility . the company 2019s credit facility has an aggregate commitment amount of $ 4.0 billion and was amended in april 2017 to extend the maturity date to april 2022 ( the 201c2017 credit facility 201d ) . the 2017 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2017 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 5.0 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2017 credit facility requires the company .\nQuestion: what is the net change of the balance of cash and cash equivalents during 2017?\nAnswer: 803.0\nQuestion: what was the balance at the start of 2017?\nAnswer: 6091.0\nQuestion: what is the net change over the starting balance?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.13183" } ]
CONVFINQA8143	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe agencies consider many factors in determining the final rating of an insurance company . one consideration is the relative level of statutory surplus necessary to support the business written . statutory surplus represents the capital of the insurance company reported in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by the applicable state insurance department . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2014 201cdowngrades in our financial strength or credit ratings , which may make our products less attractive , could increase our cost of capital and inhibit our ability to refinance our debt , which would have a material adverse effect on our business , financial condition , results of operations and liquidity . 201d statutory surplus the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013</td><td>$ 7157</td><td>$ 6639</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and casualty insurance subsidiaries</td><td>8069</td><td>8022</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 15226</td><td>$ 14661</td></tr></table> statutory capital and surplus for the u.s . life insurance subsidiaries , including domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013 , increased by $ 518 , primarily due to variable annuity surplus impacts of $ 788 , net income from non-variable annuity business of $ 187 , increases in unrealized gains from other invested assets carrying values of $ 138 , partially offset by returns of capital of $ 500 , and changes in reserves on account of change in valuation basis of $ 100 . effective april 30 , 2014 the last domestic captive ceased operations . statutory capital and surplus for the property and casualty insurance increased by $ 47 , primarily due to statutory net income of $ 1.1 billion , and unrealized gains on investments of $ 1.4 billion , largely offset by dividends to the hfsg holding company of $ 2.5 billion . the company also held regulatory capital and surplus for its former operations in japan until the sale of those operations on june 30 , 2014 . under the accounting practices and procedures governed by japanese regulatory authorities , the company 2019s statutory capital and surplus was $ 1.2 billion as of december 31 , 2013. .\nQuestion: what is the balance of u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2014?\nAnswer: 7157.0\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\nAnswer: 6639.0\nQuestion: what is the total for both years?\nAnswer: 13796.0\nQuestion: what is the yearly average?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6898.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4609	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbhge 2018 form 10-k \| 85 it is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months due to expiring statutes , audit activity , tax payments , and competent authority proceedings related to transfer pricing or final decisions in matters that are the subject of litigation in various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate . at december 31 , 2018 , we had approximately $ 96 million of tax liabilities , net of $ 1 million of tax assets , related to uncertain tax positions , each of which are individually insignificant , and each of which are reasonably possible of being settled within the next twelve months . we conduct business in more than 120 countries and are subject to income taxes in most taxing jurisdictions in which we operate . all internal revenue service examinations have been completed and closed through year end 2015 for the most significant u.s . returns . we believe there are no other jurisdictions in which the outcome of unresolved issues or claims is likely to be material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . we further believe that we have made adequate provision for all income tax uncertainties . note 13 . stock-based compensation in july 2017 , we adopted the bhge 2017 long-term incentive plan ( lti plan ) under which we may grant stock options and other equity-based awards to employees and non-employee directors providing services to the company and our subsidiaries . a total of up to 57.4 million shares of class a common stock are authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the lti plan over its term which expires on the date of the annual meeting of the company in 2027 . a total of 46.2 million shares of class a common stock are available for issuance as of december 31 , 2018 . stock-based compensation cost was $ 121 million and $ 37 million in 2018 and 2017 , respectively . stock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant based on the calculated fair value of the award and is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the equity grant . the compensation cost is determined based on awards ultimately expected to vest ; therefore , we have reduced the cost for estimated forfeitures based on historical forfeiture rates . forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised , if necessary , in subsequent periods to reflect actual forfeitures . there were no stock-based compensation costs capitalized as the amounts were not material . stock options we may grant stock options to our officers , directors and key employees . stock options generally vest in equal amounts over a three-year vesting period provided that the employee has remained continuously employed by the company through such vesting date . the fair value of each stock option granted is estimated using the black- scholes option pricing model . the following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model for options granted under the lti plan . the expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding . the expected life is based on a simple average of the vesting term and original contractual term of the awards . the expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our five main competitors over a six year period . the risk-free interest rate is based on the observed u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time the options were granted . the dividend yield is based on a five year history of dividend payouts in baker hughes. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>33.7% ( 33.7 % )</td><td>36.4% ( 36.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average fair value per share at grant date</td><td>$ 10.34</td><td>$ 12.32</td></tr></table> baker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements .\nQuestion: what is the net change in fair value per share from 2017 to 2018?\nAnswer: -1.98\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.16071" } ]
CONVFINQA4102	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 liquidity and capital management liquidity risk has two fundamental components . the first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost . the second is the potential inability to operate our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available . we manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level ( bank , parent company and nonbank subsidiaries combined ) to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal 201cbusiness as usual 201d and stressful circumstances , and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity . management monitors liquidity through a series of early warning indicators that may indicate a potential market , or pnc-specific , liquidity stress event . in addition , management performs a set of liquidity stress tests over multiple time horizons with varying levels of severity and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity stress event . in the most severe liquidity stress simulation , we assume that our liquidity position is under pressure , while the market in general is under systemic pressure . the simulation considers , among other things , the impact of restricted access to both secured and unsecured external sources of funding , accelerated run-off of customer deposits , valuation pressure on assets and heavy demand to fund committed obligations . parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period . liquidity-related risk limits are established within our enterprise liquidity management policy and supporting policies . management committees , including the asset and liability committee , and the board of directors and its risk committee regularly review compliance with key established limits . in addition to these liquidity monitoring measures and tools described above , we also monitor our liquidity by reference to the liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) which is further described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . pnc and pnc bank calculate the lcr on a daily basis and as of december 31 , 2018 , the lcr for pnc and pnc bank exceeded the fully phased-in requirement of 100% ( 100 % ) . we provide additional information regarding regulatory liquidity requirements and their potential impact on us in the supervision and regulation section of item 1 business and item 1a risk factors of this report . sources of liquidity our largest source of liquidity on a consolidated basis is the customer deposit base generated by our banking businesses . these deposits provide relatively stable and low-cost funding . total deposits increased to $ 267.8 billion at december 31 , 2018 from $ 265.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 driven by growth in interest-bearing deposits partially offset by a decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits . see the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our deposits . additionally , certain assets determined by us to be liquid as well as unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to manage our liquidity position . at december 31 , 2018 , our liquid assets consisted of short-term investments ( federal funds sold , resale agreements , trading securities and interest-earning deposits with banks ) totaling $ 22.1 billion and securities available for sale totaling $ 63.4 billion . the level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors , including market conditions , loan and deposit growth and balance sheet management activities . our liquid assets included $ 2.7 billion of securities available for sale and trading securities pledged as collateral to secure public and trust deposits , repurchase agreements and for other purposes . in addition , $ 4.9 billion of securities held to maturity were also pledged as collateral for these purposes . we also obtain liquidity through various forms of funding , including long-term debt ( senior notes , subordinated debt and fhlb borrowings ) and short-term borrowings ( securities sold under repurchase agreements , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings ) . see note 10 borrowed funds and the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our borrowings . total senior and subordinated debt , on a consolidated basis , decreased due to the following activity : table 24 : senior and subordinated debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issuances</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calls and maturities</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>-.1 ( .1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 30.9</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the amount of total deposits in 2018?\nAnswer: 267.8\nQuestion: what was the value in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "265.1" } ]
CONVFINQA4803	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe second largest closed-end fund manager and a top- ten manager by aum and 2013 net flows of long-term open-end mutual funds1 . in 2013 , we were also the leading manager by net flows for long-dated fixed income mutual funds1 . 2022 we have fully integrated our legacy retail and ishares retail distribution teams to create a unified client-facing presence . as retail clients increasingly use blackrock 2019s capabilities in combination 2014 active , alternative and passive 2014 it is a strategic priority for blackrock to coherently deliver these capabilities through one integrated team . 2022 international retail long-term net inflows of $ 17.5 billion , representing 15% ( 15 % ) organic growth , were positive across major regions and diversified across asset classes . equity net inflows of $ 6.4 billion were driven by strong demand for our top-performing european equities franchise as investor risk appetite for the sector improved . multi-asset class and fixed income products each generated net inflows of $ 4.8 billion , as investors looked to manage duration and volatility in their portfolios . in 2013 , we were ranked as the third largest cross border fund provider2 . in the united kingdom , we ranked among the five largest fund managers2 . ishares . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>component changes in aum 2014 ishares 12/31/2012</td><td>component changes in aum 2014 ishares net new business</td><td>component changes in aum 2014 ishares acquisition ( 1 )</td><td>component changes in aum 2014 ishares market / fx</td><td>component changes in aum 2014 ishares 12/31/2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity</td><td>$ 534648</td><td>$ 74119</td><td>$ 13021</td><td>$ 96347</td><td>$ 718135</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fixed income</td><td>192852</td><td>-7450 ( 7450 )</td><td>1294</td><td>-7861 ( 7861 )</td><td>178835</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>multi-asset class</td><td>869</td><td>355</td><td>2014</td><td>86</td><td>1310</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>alternatives ( 2 )</td><td>24337</td><td>-3053 ( 3053 )</td><td>1645</td><td>-6837 ( 6837 )</td><td>16092</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ishares</td><td>$ 752706</td><td>$ 63971</td><td>$ 15960</td><td>$ 81735</td><td>$ 914372</td></tr></table> alternatives ( 2 ) 24337 ( 3053 ) 1645 ( 6837 ) 16092 total ishares $ 752706 $ 63971 $ 15960 $ 81735 $ 914372 ( 1 ) amounts represent $ 16.0 billion of aum acquired in the credit suisse etf acquisition in july 2013 . ( 2 ) amounts include commodity ishares . ishares is the leading etf provider in the world , with $ 914.4 billion of aum at december 31 , 2013 , and was the top asset gatherer globally in 20133 with $ 64.0 billion of net inflows for an organic growth rate of 8% ( 8 % ) . equity net inflows of $ 74.1 billion were driven by flows into funds with broad developed market exposures , partially offset by outflows from emerging markets products . ishares fixed income experienced net outflows of $ 7.5 billion , as the continued low interest rate environment led many liquidity-oriented investors to sell long-duration assets , which made up the majority of the ishares fixed income suite . in 2013 , we launched several funds to meet demand from clients seeking protection in a rising interest rate environment by offering an expanded product set that includes four new u.s . funds , including short-duration versions of our flagship high yield and investment grade credit products , and short maturity and liquidity income funds . ishares alternatives had $ 3.1 billion of net outflows predominantly out of commodities . ishares represented 23% ( 23 % ) of long-term aum at december 31 , 2013 and 35% ( 35 % ) of long-term base fees for ishares offers the most diverse product set in the industry with 703 etfs at year-end 2013 , and serves the broadest client base , covering more than 25 countries on five continents . during 2013 , ishares continued its dual commitment to innovation and responsible product structuring by introducing 42 new etfs , acquiring credit suisse 2019s 58 etfs in europe and entering into a critical new strategic alliance with fidelity investments to deliver fidelity 2019s more than 10 million clients increased access to ishares products , tools and support . our alliance with fidelity investments and a successful full first year for the core series have deeply expanded our presence and offerings among buy-and-hold investors . our broad product range offers investors a precise , transparent and low-cost way to tap market returns and gain access to a full range of asset classes and global markets that have been difficult or expensive for many investors to access until now , as well as the liquidity required to make adjustments to their exposures quickly and cost-efficiently . 2022 u.s . ishares aum ended at $ 655.6 billion with $ 41.4 billion of net inflows driven by strong demand for developed markets equities and short-duration fixed income . during the fourth quarter of 2012 , we debuted the core series in the united states , designed to provide the essential building blocks for buy-and-hold investors to use in constructing the core of their portfolio . the core series demonstrated solid results in its first full year , raising $ 20.0 billion in net inflows , primarily in u.s . equities . in the united states , ishares maintained its position as the largest etf provider , with 39% ( 39 % ) share of aum3 . 2022 international ishares aum ended at $ 258.8 billion with robust net new business of $ 22.6 billion led by demand for european and japanese equities , as well as a diverse range of fixed income products . at year-end 2013 , ishares was the largest european etf provider with 48% ( 48 % ) of aum3 . 1 simfund 2 lipper feri 3 blackrock ; bloomberg .\nQuestion: what is the value of ishares aum less net inflows?\nAnswer: 614.2\nQuestion: what were the value of net inflows for ishares aum?\nAnswer: 41.4\nQuestion: what is that value divided by the net ishares value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.0674" } ]
CONVFINQA5460	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .\nQuestion: what was the total of capital expenditures in 2017?\nAnswer: 11.8\nQuestion: and what was that total in 2016?\nAnswer: 9.6\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 2.2\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2016 total, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.22917" } ]
CONVFINQA4042	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfrom time to time , we may elect to use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany transactions and projected inventory purchases for our european and canadian subsidiaries . in addition , we may elect to enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on pound sterling denominated balance sheet items . we do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes . based on the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 , we receive u.s . dollars in exchange for canadian dollars at a weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rate of 1.03 cad per $ 1.00 , u.s . dollars in exchange for euros at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 20ac0.77 per $ 1.00 and euros in exchange for pounds sterling at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of a30.84 per 20ac1.00 . as of december 31 , 2011 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our canadian subsidiary was $ 51.1 million with contract maturities of 1 month or less , and the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our european subsidiary was $ 50.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month . as of december 31 , 2011 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contract used to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on pound sterling denominated balance sheet items was 20ac10.5 million , or $ 13.6 million , with a contract maturity of 1 month . the foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges , and accordingly , changes in their fair value are recorded in other expense , net on the consolidated statements of income . the fair values of our foreign currency forward contracts were liabilities of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet . refer to note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the fair value measurements . included in other expense , net were the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 , ( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )</td><td>$ -4027 ( 4027 )</td><td>$ -1280 ( 1280 )</td><td>$ 5222</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>realized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )</td><td>298</td><td>-2638 ( 2638 )</td><td>-261 ( 261 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized derivative losses</td><td>-31 ( 31 )</td><td>-809 ( 809 )</td><td>-1060 ( 1060 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>realized derivative gains ( losses )</td><td>1696</td><td>3549</td><td>-4412 ( 4412 )</td></tr></table> we enter into foreign currency forward contracts with major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings and are exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by these financial institutions . this credit risk is generally limited to the unrealized gains in the foreign currency forward contracts . however , we monitor the credit quality of these financial institutions and consider the risk of counterparty default to be minimal . although we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows , we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations . inflation inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results . although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date , a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs. .\nQuestion: what was the total of unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses ) in the year of 2011, in thousands?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-4027.0" } ]
CONVFINQA12	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in the performance of the united parcel service inc . from 2004 to 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-24.05" } ]
CONVFINQA2044	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .\nQuestion: what was the portion of the anticipated increased in the berths capacity to service european cruise market between 2012 and 2016?\nAnswer: 0.18065\nQuestion: what was the change in the number of global guests between 2007 and 2011?\nAnswer: 3641000.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage increase during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.21952" } ]
CONVFINQA3784	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nn o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 : number of restricted stock weighted average grant- date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of restricted stock</td><td>weighted average grant- date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2005</td><td>3488668</td><td>$ 41.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1632504</td><td>$ 56.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1181249 ( 1181249 )</td><td>$ 40.20</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-360734 ( 360734 )</td><td>$ 44.04</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2006</td><td>3579189</td><td>$ 48.07</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1818716</td><td>$ 56.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1345412 ( 1345412 )</td><td>$ 44.48</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-230786 ( 230786 )</td><td>$ 51.57</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2007</td><td>3821707</td><td>$ 53.12</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>1836532</td><td>$ 59.84</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1403826 ( 1403826 )</td><td>$ 50.96</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-371183 ( 371183 )</td><td>$ 53.75</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2008</td><td>3883230</td><td>$ 57.01</td></tr></table> under the provisions of fas 123r , the recognition of deferred compensation , a contra-equity account representing the amount of unrecognized restricted stock expense that is reduced as expense is recognized , at the date restricted stock is granted is no longer permitted . therefore , upon adoption of fas 123r , the amount of deferred compensation that had been reflected in unearned stock grant compensation was reclassified to additional paid-in capital in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . restricted stock units the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of other awards , including restricted stock units . the company generally grants restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . each restricted stock unit repre- sents the company 2019s obligation to deliver to the holder one share of common shares upon vesting . during 2008 , the company awarded 223588 restricted stock units to officers of the company and its subsidiaries with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 59.93 . during 2007 , 108870 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.29 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . during 2006 , 83370 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.36 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . the company also grants restricted stock units with a 1-year vesting period to non-management directors . delivery of common shares on account of these restricted stock units to non-management directors is deferred until six months after the date of the non-management directors 2019 termination from the board . during 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , 40362 restricted stock units , 29676 restricted stock units , and 23092 restricted stock units , respectively , were awarded to non-management direc- the espp gives participating employees the right to purchase common shares through payroll deductions during consecutive 201csubscription periods . 201d annual purchases by participants are limited to the number of whole shares that can be purchased by an amount equal to ten percent of the participant 2019s compensation or $ 25000 , whichever is less . the espp has two six-month subscription periods , the first of which runs between january 1 and june 30 and the second of which runs between july 1 and december 31 of each year . the amounts that have been collected from participants during a subscription period are used on the 201cexercise date 201d to purchase full shares of common shares . an exercise date is generally the last trading day of a sub- scription period . the number of shares purchased is equal to the total amount , as of the exercise date , that has been collected from the participants through payroll deductions for that subscription period , divided by the 201cpurchase price 201d , rounded down to the next full share . effective for and from the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price is 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the exercise date . prior to the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price was calculated as the lower of ( i ) 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the first day of the subscription period , or .\nQuestion: what is the net impact of granted and vested shares in the number of unvested restricted stocks in 2007?\nAnswer: 473304.0\nQuestion: what about the total impact of the forfeited shares are included?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "242518.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4186	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations . the company believes that adequate provisions have been made for income taxes for all periods through december 31 , 2010 . 12 . stock-based compensation the company recognized stock-based compensation of $ 52.6 million , $ 60.7 million and $ 54.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 included $ 6.9 million related to the modification of the vesting and exercise terms for certain employee 2019s equity awards . the company did not capitalize any stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . summary of stock-based compensation plans 2014the company maintains equity incentive plans that provide for the grant of stock-based awards to its directors , officers and employees . under the 2007 equity incentive plan ( 201c2007 plan 201d ) , which provides for the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options , as well as restricted stock units , restricted stock and other stock-based awards , exercise prices in the case of non-qualified and incentive stock options are not less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant . equity awards typically vest ratably over various periods , generally four years , and generally expire ten years from the date of grant . stock options 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , the company had the ability to grant stock-based awards with respect to an aggregate of 22.0 million shares of common stock under the 2007 plan . the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the table below . the risk-free treasury rate is based on the u.s . treasury yield in effect at the accounting measurement date . the expected life ( estimated period of time outstanding ) was estimated using the vesting term and historical exercise behavior of company employees . the expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the expected life of the stock options . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.39% ( 2.39 % )</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.04% ( 2.04 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % ) 2013 3.05% ( 3.05 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.35% ( 2.35 % )</td><td>1.71% ( 1.71 % )</td><td>1.89% ( 1.89 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4.60 years</td><td>4.00 years</td><td>4.00 years</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.11% ( 37.11 % ) 2013 37.48% ( 37.48 % )</td><td>36.00% ( 36.00 % ) 2013 36.63% ( 36.63 % )</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % ) 2013 35.30% ( 35.30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.14% ( 37.14 % )</td><td>36.23% ( 36.23 % )</td><td>29.10% ( 29.10 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant date fair value per share during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 15.03 , $ 8.90 and $ 9.55 , respectively . the intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 62.7 million , $ 40.1 million and $ 99.1 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was approximately $ 27.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $ 129.1 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company realized approximately $ 0.3 million of state tax benefits from the exercise of stock options. .\nQuestion: what is weighted average risk-free interest rate in 2010?\nAnswer: 2.35\nQuestion: what about in 2009?\nAnswer: 1.71\nQuestion: what is the net increase?\nAnswer: 0.64\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.37427" } ]
CONVFINQA2865	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2004 and 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 13.12</td><td>$ 9.89</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>16.00</td><td>11.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>15.85</td><td>13.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>18.75</td><td>15.19</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2003</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 5.94</td><td>$ 3.55</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>9.90</td><td>5.41</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>11.74</td><td>8.73</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>12.00</td><td>9.59</td></tr></table> on march 18 , 2005 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 18.79 per share as reported on the as of march 18 , 2005 , we had 230604932 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 743 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . our charter prohibits the future issuance of shares of class b common stock . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . our charter permits the issuance of shares of class c common stock in the future . the information under 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 201d from the definitive proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference into item 12 of this annual report . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 93 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior notes due 2009 , our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 , and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our borrower subsidiaries are generally prohibited under the terms of the credit facility , subject to certain exceptions , from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests , except that , if no default exists or would be created thereby under the credit facility , our borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the credit facility within certain specified amounts and , in addition , may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in respect of our outstanding indebtedness and permitted future indebtedness . the indentures governing the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes due 2011 of american towers , inc . ( ati ) , our principal operating subsidiary , prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain .\nQuestion: what was the share high price for the quarter ended june 30?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "16.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2346	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nestimated future pension benefit payments for the next ten years under the plan ( in millions ) are as follows : estimated future payments: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 14.9</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>15.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>16.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>19.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>21.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014 through 2018</td><td>142.2</td></tr></table> bfi post retirement healthcare plan we acquired obligations under the bfi post retirement healthcare plan as part of our acquisition of allied . this plan provides continued medical coverage for certain former employees following their retirement , including some employees subject to collective bargaining agreements . eligibility for this plan is limited to certain of those employees who had ten or more years of service and were age 55 or older as of december 31 , 1998 , and certain employees in california who were hired on or before december 31 , 2005 and who retire on or after age 55 with at least thirty years of service . liabilities acquired for this plan were $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , at the acquisition date and at december 31 , 2008 . multi-employer pension plans we contribute to 25 multi-employer pension plans under collective bargaining agreements covering union- represented employees . we acquired responsibility for contributions for a portion of these plans as part of our acquisition of allied . approximately 22% ( 22 % ) of our total current employees are participants in such multi- employer plans . these plans generally provide retirement benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers . we do not administer these multi-employer plans . in general , these plans are managed by a board of trustees with the unions appointing certain trustees and other contributing employers of the plan appointing certain members . we generally are not represented on the board of trustees . we do not have current plan financial information from the plans 2019 administrators , but based on the information available to us , it is possible that some of the multi-employer plans to which we contribute may be underfunded . the pension protection act , enacted in august 2006 , requires underfunded pension plans to improve their funding ratios within prescribed intervals based on the level of their underfunding . until the plan trustees develop the funding improvement plans or rehabilitation plans as required by the pension protection act , we are unable to determine the amount of assessments we may be subject to , if any . accordingly , we cannot determine at this time the impact that the pension protection act may have on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . furthermore , under current law regarding multi-employer benefit plans , a plan 2019s termination , our voluntary withdrawal , or the mass withdrawal of all contributing employers from any under-funded , multi-employer pension plan would require us to make payments to the plan for our proportionate share of the multi- employer plan 2019s unfunded vested liabilities . it is possible that there may be a mass withdrawal of employers contributing to these plans or plans may terminate in the near future . we could have adjustments to our estimates for these matters in the near term that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . our pension expense for multi-employer plans was $ 21.8 million , $ 18.9 million and $ 17.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . republic services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements %%transmsg* transmitting job : p14076 pcn : 133000000 *%%pcmsg\|131 \|00027\|yes\|no\|02/28/2009 21:12\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what was the estimated future pension benefit payments increase from 2011 to 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7888	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company recorded equity earnings , net of taxes , related to ilim of $ 290 million in 2018 , compared with earnings of $ 183 million in 2017 , and $ 199 million in 2016 . operating results recorded in 2018 included an after-tax non-cash foreign exchange loss of $ 82 million , compared with an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 15 million in 2017 and an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 25 million in 2016 , primarily on the remeasurement of ilim's u.s . dollar denominated net debt . ilim delivered outstanding performance in 2018 , driven largely by higher price realization and strong demand . sales volumes for the joint venture increased year over year for shipments to china of softwood pulp and linerboard , but were offset by decreased sales of hardwood pulp to china . sales volumes in the russian market increased for softwood pulp and hardwood pulp , but decreased for linerboard . average sales price realizations were significantly higher in 2018 for sales of softwood pulp , hardwood pulp and linerboard to china and other export markets . average sales price realizations in russian markets increased year over year for all products . input costs were higher in 2018 , primarily for wood , fuel and chemicals . distribution costs were negatively impacted by tariffs and inflation . the company received cash dividends from the joint venture of $ 128 million in 2018 , $ 133 million in 2017 and $ 58 million in entering the first quarter of 2019 , sales volumes are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2018 , due to the seasonal slowdown in china and fewer trading days . based on pricing to date in the current quarter , average sales prices are expected to decrease for hardwood pulp , softwood pulp and linerboard to china . input costs are projected to be relatively flat , while distribution costs are expected to increase . equity earnings - gpip international paper recorded equity earnings of $ 46 million on its 20.5% ( 20.5 % ) ownership position in gpip in 2018 . the company received cash dividends from the investment of $ 25 million in 2018 . liquidity and capital resources overview a major factor in international paper 2019s liquidity and capital resource planning is its generation of operating cash flow , which is highly sensitive to changes in the pricing and demand for our major products . while changes in key cash operating costs , such as energy , raw material , mill outage and transportation costs , do have an effect on operating cash generation , we believe that our focus on pricing and cost controls has improved our cash flow generation over an operating cycle . cash uses during 2018 were primarily focused on working capital requirements , capital spending , debt reductions and returning cash to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases under the company's share repurchase program . cash provided by operating activities cash provided by operations , including discontinued operations , totaled $ 3.2 billion in 2018 , compared with $ 1.8 billion for 2017 , and $ 2.5 billion for 2016 . cash used by working capital components ( accounts receivable , contract assets and inventory less accounts payable and accrued liabilities , interest payable and other ) totaled $ 439 million in 2018 , compared with cash used by working capital components of $ 402 million in 2017 , and cash provided by working capital components of $ 71 million in 2016 . investment activities including discontinued operations , investment activities in 2018 increased from 2017 , as 2018 included higher capital spending . in 2016 , investment activity included the purchase of weyerhaeuser's pulp business for $ 2.2 billion in cash , the purchase of the holmen business for $ 57 million in cash , net of cash acquired , and proceeds from the sale of the asia packaging business of $ 108 million , net of cash divested . the company maintains an average capital spending target around depreciation and amortization levels , or modestly above , due to strategic plans over the course of an economic cycle . capital spending was $ 1.6 billion in 2018 , or 118% ( 118 % ) of depreciation and amortization , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2017 , or 98% ( 98 % ) of depreciation and amortization , and $ 1.3 billion , or 110% ( 110 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2016 . across our segments , capital spending as a percentage of depreciation and amortization ranged from 69.8% ( 69.8 % ) to 132.1% ( 132.1 % ) in 2018 . the following table shows capital spending for operations by business segment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , excluding amounts related to discontinued operations of $ 111 million in 2017 and $ 107 million in 2016. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial packaging</td><td>$ 1061</td><td>$ 836</td><td>$ 832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>global cellulose fibers</td><td>183</td><td>188</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>printing papers</td><td>303</td><td>235</td><td>215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>subtotal</td><td>1547</td><td>1259</td><td>1221</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>25</td><td>21</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>capital spending</td><td>$ 1572</td><td>$ 1280</td><td>$ 1241</td></tr></table> capital expenditures in 2019 are currently expected to be about $ 1.4 billion , or 104% ( 104 % ) of depreciation and amortization , including approximately $ 400 million of strategic investments. .\nQuestion: what portion of total capital expenditures is for the industrial packaging business segment in 2018?\nAnswer: 0.67494\nQuestion: what is the capital expenditures in the industrial packaging business segment in 2018?\nAnswer: 1061.0\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\nAnswer: 836.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "225.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8636	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe are exposed to market risk stemming from changes in interest and foreign exchange rates and commod- ity and equity prices . changes in these factors could cause fl uctuations in our earnings and cash fl ows . in the normal course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into vari- ous hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . th e counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative fi nancial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements on page 61 of this report . value at risk th e estimates in the table below are intended to mea- sure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . th e models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confi - dence level . th e var calculation used historical interest and for- eign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . th e market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . th e calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely cor- relates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally off set by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . th e positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; com- modity swaps , futures and options ; and equity instru- ments . th e calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are off set by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . th e table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 28 , 2017 , and may 29 , 2016 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 28 , 2017. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fair value impact may 28 2017</td><td>fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2017</td><td>fair value impact may 29 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate instruments</td><td>$ 25.1</td><td>$ 26.5</td><td>$ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency instruments</td><td>24.6</td><td>22.9</td><td>27.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity instruments</td><td>3.2</td><td>2.5</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity instruments</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.7</td></tr></table> quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk 44 general mills .\nQuestion: what is the fair value impact of interest rate instruments?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "26.5" } ]
CONVFINQA8823	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , management has not provided any amounts in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes , if any . legal defense costs are expensed as incurred . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries have achieved substantial success in managing litigation . nevertheless , litigation is subject to uncertainty and significant challenges remain . it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation . altria group , inc . and each of its subsidiaries named as a defendant believe , and each has been so advised by counsel handling the respective cases , that it has valid defenses to the litigation pending against it , as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts . each of the companies has defended , and will continue to defend , vigorously against litigation challenges . however , altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions in particular cases if they believe it is in the best interests of altria group , inc . to do so . overview of altria group , inc . and/or pm usa tobacco-related litigation types and number of cases : claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories : ( i ) smoking and health cases alleging personal injury brought on behalf of individual plaintiffs ; ( ii ) smoking and health cases primarily alleging personal injury or seeking court- supervised programs for ongoing medical monitoring and purporting to be brought on behalf of a class of individual plaintiffs , including cases in which the aggregated claims of a number of individual plaintiffs are to be tried in a single proceeding ; ( iii ) health care cost recovery cases brought by governmental ( both domestic and foreign ) plaintiffs seeking reimbursement for health care expenditures allegedly caused by cigarette smoking and/or disgorgement of profits ; ( iv ) class action suits alleging that the uses of the terms 201clights 201d and 201cultra lights 201d constitute deceptive and unfair trade practices , common law or statutory fraud , unjust enrichment , breach of warranty or violations of the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act ( 201crico 201d ) ; and ( v ) other tobacco- related litigation described below . plaintiffs 2019 theories of recovery and the defenses raised in pending smoking and health , health care cost recovery and 201clights/ultra lights 201d cases are discussed below . the table below lists the number of certain tobacco-related cases pending in the united states against pm usa and , in some instances , altria group , inc . as of december 31 , 2014 , december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 . type of case number of cases pending as of december 31 , 2014 number of cases pending as of december 31 , 2013 number of cases pending as of december 31 , 2012 individual smoking and health cases ( 1 ) 67 67 77 smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation ( 2 ) 5 6 7 health care cost recovery actions ( 3 ) 1 1 1 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type of case</td><td>number of casespending as ofdecember 31 2014</td><td>number of casespending as ofdecember 31 2013</td><td>number of casespending as ofdecember 31 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>individual smoking and health cases ( 1 )</td><td>67</td><td>67</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation ( 2 )</td><td>5</td><td>6</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>health care cost recovery actions ( 3 )</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions</td><td>12</td><td>15</td><td>14</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include 2558 cases brought by flight attendants seeking compensatory damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke ( 201cets 201d ) . the flight attendants allege that they are members of an ets smoking and health class action in florida , which was settled in 1997 ( broin ) . the terms of the court-approved settlement in that case allow class members to file individual lawsuits seeking compensatory damages , but prohibit them from seeking punitive damages . also , does not include individual smoking and health cases brought by or on behalf of plaintiffs in florida state and federal courts following the decertification of the engle case ( discussed below in smoking and health litigation - engle class action ) . ( 2 ) includes as one case the 600 civil actions ( of which 346 were actions against pm usa ) that were to be tried in a single proceeding in west virginia ( in re : tobacco litigation ) . the west virginia supreme court of appeals has ruled that the united states constitution did not preclude a trial in two phases in this case . issues related to defendants 2019 conduct and whether punitive damages are permissible were tried in the first phase . trial in the first phase of this case began in april 2013 . in may 2013 , the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants on the claims for design defect , negligence , failure to warn , breach of warranty , and concealment and declined to find that the defendants 2019 conduct warranted punitive damages . plaintiffs prevailed on their claim that ventilated filter cigarettes should have included use instructions for the period 1964 - 1969 . the second phase , if any , will consist of individual trials to determine liability and compensatory damages on that claim only . in august 2013 , the trial court denied all post-trial motions . the trial court entered final judgment in october 2013 and , in november 2013 , plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal to the west virginia supreme court of appeals . on november 3 , 2014 , the west virginia supreme court of appeals affirmed the final judgment . plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing with the west virginia supreme court of appeals , which the court denied on january 8 , 2015 . ( 3 ) see health care cost recovery litigation - federal government 2019s lawsuit below . altria group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements _________________________ altria_mdc_2014form10k_nolinks_crops.pdf 68 2/25/15 5:56 pm .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the number of individual smoking and health cases and smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation in 2013?\nAnswer: 73.0\nQuestion: what was the number of health care cost recovery actions cases?\nAnswer: 1.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 74.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum including 201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "89.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9963	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrepurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2012 to december 31 , 2012 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>13566</td><td>$ 10.26</td><td>0</td><td>$ 148858924</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>5345171</td><td>$ 9.98</td><td>5343752</td><td>$ 195551133</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>8797959</td><td>$ 10.87</td><td>8790000</td><td>$ 99989339</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14156696</td><td>$ 10.53</td><td>14133752</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 includes shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 13566 withheld shares in october 2012 , 1419 withheld shares in november 2012 and 7959 withheld shares in december 2012 , for a total of 22944 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 on february 24 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had approved a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock ( the 201c2012 share repurchase program 201d ) , in addition to amounts available on existing authorizations . on november 20 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had authorized an increase in our 2012 share repurchase program to $ 400.0 million of our common stock . on february 22 , 2013 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2012 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .\nQuestion: how many shares were purchased during october 2012?\nAnswer: 13566.0\nQuestion: what about the total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2012?\nAnswer: 14156696.0\nQuestion: what fraction of fourth quarter purchases occurred during october?\nAnswer: 0.00096\nQuestion: what about in percentage terms?\nAnswer: 0.09583\nQuestion: what is the number of repurchased shares during october 2012?\nAnswer: 13566.0\nQuestion: what about repurchased shares during fourth quarter of 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22944.0" } ]
CONVFINQA11016	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother taxes decreased in 2001 because its utility operations in virginia became subject to state income taxes in lieu of gross receipts taxes effective january 2001 . in addition , dominion recognized higher effective rates for foreign earnings and higher pretax income in relation to non-conventional fuel tax credits realized . dominion energy 2002 2001 2000 ( millions , except per share amounts ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions except pershare amounts )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenue</td><td>$ 5940</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 4894</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>4520</td><td>4749</td><td>3939</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income contribution</td><td>770</td><td>723</td><td>489</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>earnings per share contribution</td><td>$ 2.72</td><td>$ 2.86</td><td>$ 2.07</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity supplied* ( million mwhrs )</td><td>101</td><td>95</td><td>83</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gas transmission throughput ( bcf )</td><td>597</td><td>553</td><td>567</td></tr></table> * amounts presented are for electricity supplied by utility and merchant generation operations . operating results 2014 2002 dominion energy contributed $ 2.72 per diluted share on net income of $ 770 million for 2002 , a net income increase of $ 47 million and an earnings per share decrease of $ 0.14 over 2001 . net income for 2002 reflected lower operating revenue ( $ 204 million ) , operating expenses ( $ 229 million ) and other income ( $ 27 million ) . interest expense and income taxes , which are discussed on a consolidated basis , decreased $ 50 million over 2001 . the earnings per share decrease reflected share dilution . regulated electric sales revenue increased $ 179 million . favorable weather conditions , reflecting increased cooling and heating degree-days , as well as customer growth , are estimated to have contributed $ 133 million and $ 41 million , respectively . fuel rate recoveries increased approximately $ 65 million for 2002 . these recoveries are generally offset by increases in elec- tric fuel expense and do not materially affect income . partially offsetting these increases was a net decrease of $ 60 million due to other factors not separately measurable , such as the impact of economic conditions on customer usage , as well as variations in seasonal rate premiums and discounts . nonregulated electric sales revenue increased $ 9 million . sales revenue from dominion 2019s merchant generation fleet decreased $ 21 million , reflecting a $ 201 million decline due to lower prices partially offset by sales from assets acquired and constructed in 2002 and the inclusion of millstone operations for all of 2002 . revenue from the wholesale marketing of utility generation decreased $ 74 million . due to the higher demand of utility service territory customers during 2002 , less production from utility plant generation was available for profitable sale in the wholesale market . revenue from retail energy sales increased $ 71 million , reflecting primarily customer growth over the prior year . net revenue from dominion 2019s electric trading activities increased $ 33 million , reflecting the effect of favorable price changes on unsettled contracts and higher trading margins . nonregulated gas sales revenue decreased $ 351 million . the decrease included a $ 239 million decrease in sales by dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing opera- tions , reflecting to a large extent declining prices . revenue associated with gas trading operations , net of related cost of sales , decreased $ 112 million . the decrease included $ 70 mil- lion of realized and unrealized losses on the economic hedges of natural gas production by the dominion exploration & pro- duction segment . as described below under selected information 2014 energy trading activities , sales of natural gas by the dominion exploration & production segment at market prices offset these financial losses , resulting in a range of prices contemplated by dominion 2019s overall risk management strategy . the remaining $ 42 million decrease was due to unfavorable price changes on unsettled contracts and lower overall trading margins . those losses were partially offset by contributions from higher trading volumes in gas and oil markets . gas transportation and storage revenue decreased $ 44 million , primarily reflecting lower rates . electric fuel and energy purchases expense increased $ 94 million which included an increase of $ 66 million associated with dominion 2019s energy marketing operations that are not sub- ject to cost-based rate regulation and an increase of $ 28 million associated with utility operations . substantially all of the increase associated with non-regulated energy marketing opera- tions related to higher volumes purchased during the year . for utility operations , energy costs increased $ 66 million for pur- chases subject to rate recovery , partially offset by a $ 38 million decrease in fuel expenses associated with lower wholesale mar- keting of utility plant generation . purchased gas expense decreased $ 245 million associated with dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing oper- ations . this decrease reflected approximately $ 162 million asso- ciated with declining prices and $ 83 million associated with lower purchased volumes . liquids , pipeline capacity and other purchases decreased $ 64 million , primarily reflecting comparably lower levels of rate recoveries of certain costs of transmission operations in the cur- rent year period . the difference between actual expenses and amounts recovered in the period are deferred pending future rate adjustments . other operations and maintenance expense decreased $ 14 million , primarily reflecting an $ 18 million decrease in outage costs due to fewer generation unit outages in the current year . depreciation expense decreased $ 11 million , reflecting decreases in depreciation associated with changes in the esti- mated useful lives of certain electric generation property , par- tially offset by increased depreciation associated with state line and millstone operations . other income decreased $ 27 million , including a $ 14 mil- lion decrease in net realized investment gains in the millstone 37d o m i n i o n 2019 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t .\nQuestion: what was operating revenue in 2001?\nAnswer: 6144.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2000?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4894.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6522	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , we granted sars under the 2003 plan . no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan . similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price . under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options . in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted . stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , we granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan . no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan . beginning in 2005 , we discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grant cash-settled performance units to officers . all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited . as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards . restricted stock 2013 we grant restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan . in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package . the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment . we also grant restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes . the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment , however , certain restricted stock awards granted in 2008 will vest over a four-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment . prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon . the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by our transfer agent . common stock units 2013 we maintain an equity compensation program for our non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan . all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors . when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units . total stock-based compensation expense total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 43 million , $ 66 million and $ 78 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the total related income tax benefits were $ 16 million , $ 24 million and $ 29 million . in 2008 and 2007 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 9 million and $ 27 million . tax benefits realized for deductions during 2008 and 2007 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 7 million and $ 30 million . cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million in 2007 . there were no cash settlements in 2008 . stock option awards during 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , we granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees . the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average exercise price per share</td><td>$ 51.74</td><td>$ 60.94</td><td>$ 37.84</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected annual dividends per share</td><td>$ 0.96</td><td>$ 0.96</td><td>$ 0.80</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life in years</td><td>4.8</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>30% ( 30 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted</td><td>$ 13.03</td><td>$ 17.24</td><td>$ 10.19</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the weighted average exercise price per share\tin 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "51.74" } ]
CONVFINQA6661	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) note 17 . commitments at december 31 , 2008 , the company had the following future minimum payments due under non-cancelable agreements : capital leases operating leases sponsorship , licensing & . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td><td>capital leases</td><td>operating leases</td><td>sponsorship licensing & other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 372320</td><td>$ 8435</td><td>$ 40327</td><td>$ 323558</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>140659</td><td>2758</td><td>18403</td><td>119498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>80823</td><td>1978</td><td>11555</td><td>67290</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>50099</td><td>1819</td><td>9271</td><td>39009</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>50012</td><td>36837</td><td>7062</td><td>6113</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21292</td><td>2014</td><td>19380</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 715205</td><td>$ 51827</td><td>$ 105998</td><td>$ 557380</td></tr></table> included in the table above are capital leases with imputed interest expense of $ 9483 and a net present value of minimum lease payments of $ 42343 . in addition , at december 31 , 2008 , $ 92300 of the future minimum payments in the table above for leases , sponsorship , licensing and other agreements was accrued . consolidated rental expense for the company 2019s office space , which is recognized on a straight line basis over the life of the lease , was approximately $ 42905 , $ 35614 and $ 31467 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . consolidated lease expense for automobiles , computer equipment and office equipment was $ 7694 , $ 7679 and $ 8419 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . in january 2003 , mastercard purchased a building in kansas city , missouri for approximately $ 23572 . the building is a co-processing data center which replaced a back-up data center in lake success , new york . during 2003 , mastercard entered into agreements with the city of kansas city for ( i ) the sale-leaseback of the building and related equipment which totaled $ 36382 and ( ii ) the purchase of municipal bonds for the same amount which have been classified as municipal bonds held-to-maturity . the agreements enabled mastercard to secure state and local financial benefits . no gain or loss was recorded in connection with the agreements . the leaseback has been accounted for as a capital lease as the agreement contains a bargain purchase option at the end of the ten-year lease term on april 1 , 2013 . the building and related equipment are being depreciated over their estimated economic life in accordance with the company 2019s policy . rent of $ 1819 is due annually and is equal to the interest due on the municipal bonds . the future minimum lease payments are $ 45781 and are included in the table above . a portion of the building was subleased to the original building owner for a five-year term with a renewal option . as of december 31 , 2008 , the future minimum sublease rental income is $ 4416 . note 18 . obligations under litigation settlements on october 27 , 2008 , mastercard and visa inc . ( 201cvisa 201d ) entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201cdiscover settlement 201d ) with discover financial services , inc . ( 201cdiscover 201d ) relating to the u.s . federal antitrust litigation amongst the parties . the discover settlement ended all litigation between the parties for a total of $ 2750000 . in july 2008 , mastercard and visa had entered into a judgment sharing agreement that allocated responsibility for any judgment or settlement of the discover action between the parties . accordingly , the mastercard share of the discover settlement was $ 862500 , which was paid to discover in november 2008 . in addition , in connection with the discover settlement , morgan stanley , discover 2019s former parent company , paid mastercard $ 35000 in november 2008 , pursuant to a separate agreement . the net impact of $ 827500 is included in litigation settlements for the year ended december 31 , 2008. .\nQuestion: what portion of total future minimum payments for capital leases is due in 2011?\nAnswer: 0.02447\nQuestion: what is the total rent expense for 2007 and 2008?\nAnswer: 78519.0\nQuestion: what about the total rent expense for three years if 2006 is included?\nAnswer: 109986.0\nQuestion: what is the yearly average for this period?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "109989.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3067	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n22 general mills 2014 annual report 23 gross margin declined 1 percent in fiscal 2014 versus fiscal 2013 . gross margin as a percent of net sales of 36 percent was relatively flat compared to fiscal 2013 . selling , general and administrative ( sg&a ) expenses decreased $ 78 million in fiscal 2014 versus fiscal 2013 . the decrease in sg&a expenses was primarily driven by a 3 percent decrease in advertising and media expense , a smaller contribution to the general mills foundation , a decrease in incentive compensation expense and lower pension expense compared to fiscal 2013 . in fiscal 2014 , we recorded a $ 39 million charge related to venezuela currency devaluation compared to a $ 9 million charge in fiscal 2013 . in addition , we recorded $ 12 million of inte- gration costs in fiscal 2013 related to our acquisition of yoki . sg&a expenses as a percent of net sales decreased 1 percent compared to fiscal 2013 . restructuring , impairment , and other exit costs totaled $ 4 million in fiscal 2014 . the restructuring charge related to a productivity and cost savings plan approved in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 . these restructuring actions were completed in fiscal 2014 . in fiscal 2014 , we paid $ 22 million in cash related to restructuring actions . during fiscal 2014 , we recorded a divestiture gain of $ 66 million related to the sale of certain grain elevators in our u.s . retail segment . there were no divestitures in fiscal 2013 . interest , net for fiscal 2014 totaled $ 302 million , $ 15 million lower than fiscal 2013 . the average interest rate decreased 41 basis points , including the effect of the mix of debt , generating a $ 31 million decrease in net interest . average interest bearing instruments increased $ 367 million , generating a $ 16 million increase in net interest . our consolidated effective tax rate for fiscal 2014 was 33.3 percent compared to 29.2 percent in fiscal 2013 . the 4.1 percentage point increase was primarily related to the restructuring of our general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) subsidiary during the first quarter of 2013 which resulted in a $ 63 million decrease to deferred income tax liabilities related to the tax basis of the investment in gmc and certain distributed assets , with a correspond- ing non-cash reduction to income taxes . during fiscal 2013 , we also recorded a $ 34 million discrete decrease in income tax expense and an increase in our deferred tax assets related to certain actions taken to restore part of the tax benefits associated with medicare part d subsidies which had previously been reduced in fiscal 2010 with the enactment of the patient protection and affordable care act , as amended by the health care and education reconciliation act of 2010 . our fiscal 2013 tax expense also includes a $ 12 million charge associated with the liquidation of a corporate investment . after-tax earnings from joint ventures for fiscal 2014 decreased to $ 90 million compared to $ 99 million in fiscal 2013 primarily driven by increased consumer spending at cereal partners worldwide ( cpw ) and unfavorable foreign currency exchange from h e4agen- dazs japan , inc . ( hdj ) . the change in net sales for each joint venture is set forth in the following table : joint venture change in net sales as reported constant currency basis fiscal 2014 fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 vs . 2013 cpw ( 1 ) % ( % ) flat . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cpw</td><td>as reported fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 ( 1 ) % ( % )</td><td>constant currency basis fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 flat</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hdj</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>9</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>joint ventures</td><td>( 2 ) % ( % )</td><td>2</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr></table> in fiscal 2014 , cpw net sales declined by 1 percent- age point due to unfavorable foreign currency exchange . contribution from volume growth was flat compared to fiscal 2013 . in fiscal 2014 , net sales for hdj decreased 8 percentage points from fiscal 2013 as 11 percentage points of contributions from volume growth was offset by 17 percentage points of net sales decline from unfa- vorable foreign currency exchange and 2 percentage points of net sales decline attributable to unfavorable net price realization and mix . average diluted shares outstanding decreased by 20 million in fiscal 2014 from fiscal 2013 due primar- ily to the repurchase of 36 million shares , partially offset by the issuance of 7 million shares related to stock compensation plans . fiscal 2014 consolidated balance sheet analysis cash and cash equivalents increased $ 126 million from fiscal 2013 . receivables increased $ 37 million from fiscal 2013 pri- marily driven by timing of sales . inventories increased $ 14 million from fiscal 2013 . prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased $ 29 million from fiscal 2013 , mainly due to a decrease in other receivables related to the liquidation of a corporate investment . land , buildings , and equipment increased $ 64 million from fiscal 2013 , as $ 664 million of capital expenditures .\nQuestion: what is the after-tax earnings from joint ventures in 2014?\nAnswer: 90.0\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\nAnswer: 99.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-9.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7353	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfor the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>1.85% ( 1.85 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>26.50</td><td>28.70</td><td>27.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.60</td><td>4.19</td><td>3.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>7.8</td><td>7.8</td><td>5.0</td></tr></table> compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\\\fc\\\\delivery_1024177\\\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .\nQuestion: what wast the risk free interest rate in 2006?\nAnswer: 4.6\nQuestion: what was the rate in 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.19" } ]
CONVFINQA8344	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour consolidated net cash flows used for investing activities were $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , compared with $ 3.2 billion in 2009 . net investing activities for the indicated periods were related primarily to net purchases of fixed maturities and for 2010 included the acquisitions of rain and hail and jerneh insurance berhad . our consolidated net cash flows from financing activities were $ 732 million in 2010 , compared with net cash flows used for financing activities of $ 321 million in 2009 . net cash flows from/used for financing activities in 2010 and 2009 , included dividends paid on our common shares of $ 435 million and $ 388 million , respectively . net cash flows from financing activ- ities in 2010 , included net proceeds of $ 699 million from the issuance of long-term debt , $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements , and $ 300 million in credit facility borrowings . this was partially offset by repayment of $ 659 million in debt and share repurchases settled in 2010 of $ 235 million . for 2009 , net cash flows used for financing activities included net pro- ceeds from the issuance of $ 500 million in long-term debt and the net repayment of debt and reverse repurchase agreements of $ 466 million . both internal and external forces influence our financial condition , results of operations , and cash flows . claim settle- ments , premium levels , and investment returns may be impacted by changing rates of inflation and other economic conditions . in many cases , significant periods of time , ranging up to several years or more , may lapse between the occurrence of an insured loss , the reporting of the loss to us , and the settlement of the liability for that loss . from time to time , we utilize reverse repurchase agreements as a low-cost alternative for short-term funding needs . we use these instruments on a limited basis to address short-term cash timing differences without disrupting our investment portfolio holdings and settle the transactions with future operating cash flows . at december 31 , 2010 , there were $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements outstanding ( refer to short-term debt ) . in addition to cash from operations , routine sales of investments , and financing arrangements , we have agreements with a bank provider which implemented two international multi-currency notional cash pooling programs to enhance cash management efficiency during periods of short-term timing mismatches between expected inflows and outflows of cash by currency . in each program , participating ace entities establish deposit accounts in different currencies with the bank provider and each day the credit or debit balances in every account are notionally translated into a single currency ( u.s . dollars ) and then notionally pooled . the bank extends overdraft credit to any participating ace entity as needed , provided that the overall notionally-pooled balance of all accounts in each pool at the end of each day is at least zero . actual cash balances are not physically converted and are not co-mingled between legal entities . ace entities may incur overdraft balances as a means to address short-term timing mismatches , and any overdraft balances incurred under this program by an ace entity would be guaranteed by ace limited ( up to $ 150 million in the aggregate ) . our revolving credit facility allows for same day drawings to fund a net pool overdraft should participating ace entities withdraw contributed funds from the pool . capital resources capital resources consist of funds deployed or available to be deployed to support our business operations . the following table summarizes the components of our capital resources at december 31 , 2010 , and 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars except for percentages )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term debt</td><td>$ 1300</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>3358</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>4658</td><td>3319</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>309</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>22974</td><td>19667</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total capitalization</td><td>$ 27941</td><td>$ 23295</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ratio of debt to total capitalization</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td><td>14.2% ( 14.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ratio of debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization</td><td>17.8% ( 17.8 % )</td><td>15.6% ( 15.6 % )</td></tr></table> our ratios of debt to total capitalization and debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization have increased temporarily due to the increase in short-term debt , as discussed below . we expect that these ratios will decline over the next six to nine months as we repay the short-term debt . we believe our financial strength provides us with the flexibility and capacity to obtain available funds externally through debt or equity financing on both a short-term and long-term basis . our ability to access the capital markets is dependent on , among other things , market conditions and our perceived financial strength . we have accessed both the debt and equity markets from time to time. .\nQuestion: what was the value of cash flow used for investing activities in 2010?\nAnswer: 4.2\nQuestion: what was the value of cash flow used for investing activities in 2009?\nAnswer: 3.2\nQuestion: what was the change in value?\nAnswer: 1.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.3125" } ]
CONVFINQA1903	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninterest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .\nQuestion: what is the interest expense in 2016?\nAnswer: 26.4\nQuestion: what about in 2015?\nAnswer: 14.6\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 11.8\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.80822\nQuestion: what is the amount of sg&a and interest expense in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "83.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9722	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nyear ended december 31 , 2004 compared to year ended december 31 , 2003 the historical results of operations of pca for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 are set forth below : for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2004 2003 change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>for the year ended december 31 , 2004</td><td>for the year ended december 31 , 2003</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1890.1</td><td>$ 1735.5</td><td>$ 154.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income before interest and taxes</td><td>$ 140.5</td><td>$ 96.9</td><td>$ 43.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>-29.6 ( 29.6 )</td><td>-121.8 ( 121.8 )</td><td>92.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income ( loss ) before taxes</td><td>110.9</td><td>-24.9 ( 24.9 )</td><td>135.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>( provision ) benefit for income taxes</td><td>-42.2 ( 42.2 )</td><td>10.5</td><td>-52.7 ( 52.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 68.7</td><td>$ -14.4 ( 14.4 )</td><td>$ 83.1</td></tr></table> net sales net sales increased by $ 154.6 million , or 8.9% ( 8.9 % ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2004 from the year ended december 31 , 2003 . net sales increased due to improved sales volumes and prices of corrugated products and containerboard compared to 2003 . total corrugated products volume sold increased 6.6% ( 6.6 % ) to 29.9 billion square feet in 2004 compared to 28.1 billion square feet in 2003 . on a comparable shipment-per-workday basis , corrugated products sales volume increased 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) in 2004 from 2003 . excluding pca 2019s acquisition of acorn in february 2004 , corrugated products volume was 5.3% ( 5.3 % ) higher in 2004 than 2003 and up 5.8% ( 5.8 % ) compared to 2003 on a shipment-per-workday basis . shipments-per-workday is calculated by dividing our total corrugated products volume during the year by the number of workdays within the year . the larger percentage increase was due to the fact that 2004 had one less workday ( 251 days ) , those days not falling on a weekend or holiday , than 2003 ( 252 days ) . containerboard sales volume to external domestic and export customers increased 6.8% ( 6.8 % ) to 475000 tons for the year ended december 31 , 2004 from 445000 tons in 2003 . income before interest and taxes income before interest and taxes increased by $ 43.6 million , or 45.1% ( 45.1 % ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2004 compared to 2003 . included in income before interest and taxes for the year ended december 31 , 2004 is income of $ 27.8 million , net of expenses , attributable to a dividend paid to pca by stv , the timberlands joint venture in which pca owns a 311 20443% ( 20443 % ) ownership interest . included in income before interest and taxes for the year ended december 31 , 2003 is a $ 3.3 million charge for fees and expenses related to the company 2019s debt refinancing which was completed in july 2003 , and a fourth quarter charge of $ 16.0 million to settle certain benefits related matters with pactiv corporation dating back to april 12 , 1999 when pca became a stand-alone company , as described below . during the fourth quarter of 2003 , pactiv notified pca that we owed pactiv additional amounts for hourly pension benefits and workers 2019 compensation liabilities dating back to april 12 , 1999 . a settlement of $ 16.0 million was negotiated between pactiv and pca in december 2003 . the full amount of the settlement was accrued in the fourth quarter of 2003 . excluding these special items , operating income decreased $ 3.4 million in 2004 compared to 2003 . the $ 3.4 million decrease in income before interest and taxes was primarily attributable to increased energy and transportation costs ( $ 19.2 million ) , higher recycled and wood fiber costs ( $ 16.7 million ) , increased salary expenses related to annual increases and new hires ( $ 5.7 million ) , and increased contractual hourly labor costs ( $ 5.6 million ) , which was partially offset by increased sales volume and sales prices ( $ 44.3 million ) . .\nQuestion: what were the net sales in 2003?\nAnswer: 1735.5\nQuestion: and what was the income before interest and taxes in that year?\nAnswer: 96.9\nQuestion: what were, then, those sales without this income?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1638.6" } ]
CONVFINQA7254	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nchanges in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2013 , 627 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 56 mmboe from december 31 , 2012 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2013 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>571</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfer to proved developed</td><td>-109 ( 109 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>627</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 included 72 mmboe in the eagle ford and 49 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 57 mmboe in the eagle ford , 18 mmboe in the bakken and 7 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to producing wells . costs incurred in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 2536 million , $ 1995 million and $ 1107 million . a total of 59 mmboe was booked as a result of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 627 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2013 , 24 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled late 2014 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time as proved undeveloped reserves in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to be developed , is being executed by the operator and encompasses a continuous drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region led to an expected project execution of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes in 2013 have extended the project duration . there are no other significant undeveloped reserves expected to be developed more than five years after their original booking . as of december 31 , 2013 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped liquid hydrocarbon , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2014 through 2018 are projected to be $ 2894 million , $ 2567 million , $ 2020 million , $ 1452 million and $ 575 million . the timing of future projects and estimated future development costs relating to the development of proved undeveloped liquid hydrocarbon , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves are forward-looking statements and are based on a number of assumptions , including ( among others ) commodity prices , presently known physical data concerning size and character of the reservoirs , economic recoverability , technology developments , future drilling success , industry economic conditions , levels of cash flow from operations , production experience and other operating considerations . to the extent these assumptions prove inaccurate , actual recoveries , timing and development costs could be different than current estimates. .\nQuestion: what was the total of costs incurred relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves in 2012 and 2013, combined, in millions?\nAnswer: 4531.0\nQuestion: including 2011, what would then be the total of costs incurred relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves in the three years, also in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5638.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5463	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements six-month offering period . the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was $ 14.83 , $ 13.42 and $ 13.64 , respectively . at december 31 , 2014 , 3.4 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply the black-scholes pricing model for shares purchased through the espp for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.06% ( 0.06 % ) 2013 0.11% ( 0.11 % )</td><td>0.07% ( 0.07 % ) 2013 0.13% ( 0.13 % )</td><td>0.05% ( 0.05 % ) 2013 0.12% ( 0.12 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.09% ( 0.09 % )</td><td>0.10% ( 0.10 % )</td><td>0.08% ( 0.08 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price over the option period</td><td>11.29% ( 11.29 % ) 2013 16.59% ( 16.59 % )</td><td>12.21% ( 12.21 % ) 2013 13.57% ( 13.57 % )</td><td>33.16% ( 33.16 % ) 2013 33.86% ( 33.86 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>14.14% ( 14.14 % )</td><td>12.88% ( 12.88 % )</td><td>33.54% ( 33.54 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividend yield</td><td>1.50% ( 1.50 % )</td><td>1.50% ( 1.50 % )</td><td>1.50% ( 1.50 % )</td></tr></table> 16 . equity mandatory convertible preferred stock offering 2014on may 12 , 2014 , the company completed a registered public offering of 6000000 shares of its 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a , par value $ 0.01 per share ( the 201cmandatory convertible preferred stock 201d ) . the net proceeds of the offering were $ 582.9 million after deducting commissions and estimated expenses . the company used the net proceeds from this offering to fund acquisitions , including the acquisition from richland , initially funded by indebtedness incurred under the 2013 credit facility . unless converted earlier , each share of the mandatory convertible preferred stock will automatically convert on may 15 , 2017 , into between 0.9174 and 1.1468 shares of common stock , depending on the applicable market value of the common stock and subject to anti-dilution adjustments . subject to certain restrictions , at any time prior to may 15 , 2017 , holders of the mandatory convertible preferred stock may elect to convert all or a portion of their shares into common stock at the minimum conversion rate then in effect . dividends on shares of mandatory convertible preferred stock are payable on a cumulative basis when , as and if declared by the company 2019s board of directors ( or an authorized committee thereof ) at an annual rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) on the liquidation preference of $ 100.00 per share , on february 15 , may 15 , august 15 and november 15 of each year , commencing on august 15 , 2014 to , and including , may 15 , 2017 . the company may pay dividends in cash or , subject to certain limitations , in shares of common stock or any combination of cash and shares of common stock . the terms of the mandatory convertible preferred stock provide that , unless full cumulative dividends have been paid or set aside for payment on all outstanding mandatory convertible preferred stock for all prior dividend periods , no dividends may be declared or paid on common stock . stock repurchase program 2014in march 2011 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to purchase up to $ 1.5 billion of common stock ( 201c2011 buyback 201d ) . in september 2013 , the company temporarily suspended repurchases in connection with its acquisition of mipt . under the 2011 buyback , the company is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices in accordance with securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , the company .\nQuestion: what was the change in the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: 1.41\nQuestion: and what was that weighted average fair value in 2013?\nAnswer: 13.42\nQuestion: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2013 weighted average fair value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.10507" } ]
CONVFINQA1092	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) mid cap 400 index and the russell 1000 index , both of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/11</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/12</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/13</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/14</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/15</td><td>12/31/16</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>a . o . smith corporation</td><td>100.0</td><td>159.5</td><td>275.8</td><td>292.0</td><td>401.0</td><td>501.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p mid cap 400 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>117.9</td><td>157.4</td><td>172.8</td><td>169.0</td><td>204.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>116.4</td><td>155.0</td><td>175.4</td><td>177.0</td><td>198.4</td></tr></table> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 smith ( a o ) corp s&p midcap 400 index russell 1000 index .\nQuestion: what was the a. o. smith corporation share price as of 12/31/16?\nAnswer: 501.4\nQuestion: and the change in price between 12/31/11 and this date?\nAnswer: 401.4\nQuestion: so what was the percentage return during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.014" } ]
CONVFINQA5009	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour digital media business consists of our websites and mobile and video-on-demand ( 201cvod 201d ) services . our websites include network branded websites such as discovery.com , tlc.com and animalplanet.com , and other websites such as howstuffworks.com , an online source of explanations of how the world actually works ; treehugger.com , a comprehensive source for 201cgreen 201d news , solutions and product information ; and petfinder.com , a leading pet adoption destination . together , these websites attracted an average of 24 million cumulative unique monthly visitors , according to comscore , inc . in 2011 . international networks our international networks segment principally consists of national and pan-regional television networks . this segment generates revenues primarily from fees charged to operators who distribute our networks , which primarily include cable and dth satellite service providers , and from advertising sold on our television networks and websites . discovery channel , animal planet and tlc lead the international networks 2019 portfolio of television networks , which are distributed in virtually every pay-television market in the world through an infrastructure that includes operational centers in london , singapore and miami . international networks has one of the largest international distribution platforms of networks with one to twelve networks in more than 200 countries and territories around the world . at december 31 , 2011 , international networks operated over 150 unique distribution feeds in over 40 languages with channel feeds customized according to language needs and advertising sales opportunities . our international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks which reached the following number of subscribers as of december 31 , 2011 : education and other our education and other segment primarily includes the sale of curriculum-based product and service offerings and postproduction audio services . this segment generates revenues primarily from subscriptions charged to k-12 schools for access to an online suite of curriculum-based vod tools , professional development services , and to a lesser extent student assessment and publication of hardcopy curriculum-based content . our education business also participates in corporate partnerships , global brand and content licensing business with leading non-profits , foundations and trade associations . other businesses primarily include postproduction audio services that are provided to major motion picture studios , independent producers , broadcast networks , cable channels , advertising agencies , and interactive producers . content development our content development strategy is designed to increase viewership , maintain innovation and quality leadership , and provide value for our network distributors and advertising customers . substantially all content is sourced from a wide range of third-party producers , which includes some of the world 2019s leading nonfiction production companies with which we have developed long-standing relationships , as well as independent producers . our production arrangements fall into three categories : produced , coproduced and licensed . substantially all produced content includes programming which we engage third parties to develop and produce while we retain editorial control and own most or all of the rights in exchange for paying all development and production costs . coproduced content refers to program rights acquired that we have collaborated with third parties to finance and develop . coproduced programs are typically high-cost projects for which neither we nor our coproducers wish to bear the entire cost or productions in which the producer has already taken on an international broadcast partner . licensed content is comprised of films or series that have been previously produced by third parties . global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>global networks discovery channel</td><td>international subscribers ( millions ) 213</td><td>regional networks dmax</td><td>international subscribers ( millions ) 47</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>animal planet</td><td>166</td><td>discovery kids</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tlc real time and travel & living</td><td>150</td><td>liv</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>discovery science</td><td>66</td><td>quest</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>discovery home & health</td><td>48</td><td>discovery history</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>turbo</td><td>37</td><td>shed</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>discovery world</td><td>27</td><td>discovery en espanol ( u.s. )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>investigation discovery</td><td>23</td><td>discovery famillia ( u.s. )</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>hd services</td><td>17</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the number of subscribers for global networks discovery channel, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "213.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8707	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nalexion pharmaceuticals , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) in 2006 , we completed a final phase iii trial of pexelizumab . after reviewing results from that trial , we along with p&g , determined not to pursue further development of pexelizumab . effective march 30 , 2007 , we and p&g mutually agreed to terminate the collaboration agreement . as the relevant agreement has been terminated in march 2007 , the remaining portion of the $ 10000 non-refundable up-front license fee , or $ 5343 , was recognized as revenue in the year ended december 31 , 2007 and is included in contract research revenues . license and research and development agreements we have entered into a number of license , research and development and manufacturing development agreements since our inception . these agreements have been made with various research institutions , universities , contractors , collaborators , and government agencies in order to advance and obtain technologies and services related to our business . license agreements generally provide for an initial fee followed by annual minimum royalty payments . additionally , certain agreements call for future payments upon the attainment of agreed upon milestones , such as , but not limited to , investigational new drug , or ind , application or approval of biologics license application . these agreements require minimum royalty payments based on sales of products developed from the applicable technologies , if any . clinical and manufacturing development agreements generally provide for us to fund manufacturing development and on-going clinical trials . clinical trial and development agreements include contract services and outside contractor services including contracted clinical site services related to patient enrolment for our clinical trials . manufacturing development agreements include clinical manufacturing and manufacturing development and scale-up . we have executed a large-scale product supply agreement with lonza sales ag for the long-term commercial manufacture of soliris ( see note 9 ) . in order to maintain our rights under these agreements , we may be required to provide a minimum level of funding or support . we may elect to terminate these arrangements . accordingly , we recognize the expense and related obligation related to these arrangements over the period of performance . the minimum fixed payments ( assuming non-termination of the above agreements ) as of december 31 , 2007 , for each of the next five years are as follows : years ending december 31 , license agreements clinical and manufacturing development agreements . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ending december 31,</td><td>license agreements</td><td>clinical and manufacturing development agreements</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 707</td><td>$ 2860</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>552</td><td>3750</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>322</td><td>7500</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>300</td><td>7500</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>300</td><td>7500</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in license agreements from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: -155.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2008?\nAnswer: 707.0\nQuestion: what is the net change divided by the 2008 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.21924" } ]
CONVFINQA1734	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfoodservice sales volumes increased in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales margins were higher reflecting the realization of sales price increases for the pass-through of earlier cost increases . raw material costs for board and resins were lower . operating costs and distribution costs were both higher . the u.s . shorewood business was sold december 31 , 2011 and the non-u.s . business was sold in january looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to increase slightly from the fourth quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly lower , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be higher for energy and wood . no planned main- tenance outages are scheduled in the first quarter . in january 2013 the company announced the perma- nent shutdown of a coated paperboard machine at the augusta mill with an annual capacity of 140000 tons . foodservice sales volumes are expected to increase . average sales margins are expected to decrease due to the realization of sales price decreases effective with our january contract open- ers . input costs for board and resin are expected to be lower and operating costs are also expected to decrease . european consumer packaging net sales in 2012 were $ 380 million compared with $ 375 million in 2011 and $ 345 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 99 million compared with $ 93 million in 2011 and $ 76 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 increased from 2011 . average sales price realizations were higher in russian markets , but were lower in european markets . input costs decreased , primarily for wood , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower in 2012 than in 2011 . looking forward to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to decrease in both europe and russia . average sales price realizations are expected to be higher in russia , but be more than offset by decreases in europe . input costs are expected to increase for wood and chemicals . no maintenance outages are scheduled for the first quarter . asian consumer packaging net sales were $ 830 million in 2012 compared with $ 855 million in 2011 and $ 705 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 4 million compared with $ 35 million in 2011 and $ 34 million in 2010 . sales volumes increased in 2012 compared with 2011 partially due to the start-up of a new coated paperboard machine . average sales price realizations were significantly lower , but were partially offset by lower input costs for purchased pulp . start-up costs for a new coated paperboard machine adversely impacted operating profits in 2012 . in the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly . average sales price realizations for folding carton board and bristols board are expected to be lower reflecting increased competitive pressures and seasonally weaker market demand . input costs should be higher for pulp and chemicals . however , costs related to the ramp-up of the new coated paperboard machine should be lower . distribution xpedx , our distribution business , is one of north america 2019s leading business-to-business distributors to manufacturers , facility managers and printers , providing customized solutions that are designed to improve efficiency , reduce costs and deliver results . customer demand is generally sensitive to changes in economic conditions and consumer behavior , along with segment specific activity including corpo- rate advertising and promotional spending , government spending and domestic manufacturing activity . distribution 2019s margins are relatively stable across an economic cycle . providing customers with the best choice for value in both products and supply chain services is a key competitive factor . addition- ally , efficient customer service , cost-effective logis- tics and focused working capital management are key factors in this segment 2019s profitability . distribution . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6040</td><td>$ 6630</td><td>$ 6735</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>22</td><td>34</td><td>78</td></tr></table> distr ibut ion 2019s 2012 annual sales decreased 9% ( 9 % ) from 2011 , and decreased 10% ( 10 % ) from 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 22 million ( $ 71 million exclud- ing reorganization costs ) compared with $ 34 million ( $ 86 million excluding reorganization costs ) in 2011 and $ 78 million in 2010 . annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment totaled $ 3.5 billion in 2012 compared with $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , reflecting declining demand and the exiting of unprofitable businesses . trade margins as a percent of sales for printing papers were relatively even with both 2011 and 2010 . revenue from packaging prod- ucts was flat at $ 1.6 billion in both 2012 and 2011 and up slightly compared to $ 1.5 billion in 2010 . pack- aging margins increased in 2012 from both 2011 and 2010 , reflecting the successful execution of strategic sourcing initiatives . facility supplies annual revenue was $ 0.9 billion in 2012 , down compared to $ 1.0 bil- lion in 2011 and 2010 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 49 million of reorganization costs for severance , professional services and asset write-downs compared with $ 52 .\nQuestion: what was the total in annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment in 2011, in millions?\nAnswer: 4000.0\nQuestion: and how much does this total represent in relation to the total distribution sales in that year, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.60332" } ]
CONVFINQA1241	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nair mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .\nQuestion: what was the backlog in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "21200.0" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.