Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA8275	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninterest expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest incurred</td><td>$ 158.1</td><td>$ 167.6</td><td>$ 153.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : capitalized interest</td><td>33.0</td><td>25.8</td><td>30.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest expense</td><td>$ 125.1</td><td>$ 141.8</td><td>$ 123.7</td></tr></table> 2014 vs . 2013 interest incurred decreased $ 9.5 . the decrease was primarily due to a lower average interest rate on the debt portfolio which reduced interest by $ 13 , partially offset by a higher average debt balance which increased interest by $ 6 . the change in capitalized interest was driven by a higher carrying value in construction in progress . 2013 vs . 2012 interest incurred increased $ 13.7 . the increase was driven primarily by a higher average debt balance for $ 41 , partially offset by a lower average interest rate on the debt portfolio of $ 24 . the change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in project spending and a lower average interest rate . effective tax rate the effective tax rate equals the income tax provision divided by income from continuing operations before taxes . refer to note 22 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for details on factors affecting the effective tax rate . 2014 vs . 2013 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 27.0% ( 27.0 % ) and 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) in 2014 and 2013 , respectively . the effective tax rate was higher in the current year primarily due to the goodwill impairment charge of $ 305.2 , which was not deductible for tax purposes , and the chilean tax reform enacted in september 2014 which increased income tax expense by $ 20.6 . these impacts were partially offset by an income tax benefit of $ 51.6 associated with losses from transactions and a tax election in a non-u.s . subsidiary . the prior year rate included income tax benefits of $ 73.7 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans and $ 3.7 for the advisory costs . refer to note 4 , business restructuring and cost reduction actions ; note 9 , goodwill ; note 22 , income taxes ; and note 23 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements for details on these transactions . on a non-gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) and 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) in 2014 and 2013 , respectively . 2013 vs . 2012 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) and 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) in 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the effective rate in 2013 includes income tax benefits of $ 73.7 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans and $ 3.7 for the advisory costs . the effective rate in 2012 includes income tax benefits of $ 105.0 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans , $ 58.3 related to the second quarter spanish tax ruling , and $ 3.7 related to the customer bankruptcy charge , offset by income tax expense of $ 43.8 related to the first quarter spanish tax settlement and $ 31.3 related to the gain on the previously held equity interest in da nanomaterials . refer to note 4 , business restructuring and cost reduction actions ; note 5 , business combinations ; note 22 , income taxes ; and note 23 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements for details on these transactions . on a non-gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) in both 2013 and 2012 . discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2012 , the board of directors authorized the sale of our homecare business , which had previously been reported as part of the merchant gases operating segment . in 2012 , we sold the majority of our homecare business to the linde group for sale proceeds of 20ac590 million ( $ 777 ) and recognized a gain of $ 207.4 ( $ 150.3 after-tax , or $ .70 per share ) . in addition , an impairment charge of $ 33.5 ( $ 29.5 after-tax , or $ .14 per share ) was recorded to write down the remaining business , which was primarily in the united kingdom and ireland , to its estimated net realizable value . in 2013 , we recorded an additional charge of $ 18.7 ( $ 13.6 after-tax , or $ .06 per share ) to update our estimate of the net realizable value . in 2014 , a gain of $ 3.9 was recognized for the sale of the remaining homecare business and settlement of contingencies on the sale to the linde group . refer to note 3 , discontinued operations , to the consolidated financial statements for additional details on this business. .\nQuestion: what is the ratio of 2013 interest expense to 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.14632" } ]
CONVFINQA10670	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin the fourth quarter of 2002 , aes lost voting control of one of the holding companies in the cemig ownership structure . this holding company indirectly owns the shares related to the cemig investment and indirectly holds the project financing debt related to cemig . as a result of the loss of voting control , aes stopped consolidating this holding company at december 31 , 2002 . other . during the fourth quarter of 2003 , the company sold its 25% ( 25 % ) ownership interest in medway power limited ( 2018 2018mpl 2019 2019 ) , a 688 mw natural gas-fired combined cycle facility located in the united kingdom , and aes medway operations limited ( 2018 2018aesmo 2019 2019 ) , the operating company for the facility , in an aggregate transaction valued at approximately a347 million ( $ 78 million ) . the sale resulted in a gain of $ 23 million which was recorded in continuing operations . mpl and aesmo were previously reported in the contract generation segment . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company sold its investment in empresa de infovias s.a . ( 2018 2018infovias 2019 2019 ) , a telecommunications company in brazil , for proceeds of $ 31 million to cemig , an affiliated company . the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc . the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company . during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india . the state of orissa appointed an administrator to take operational control of cesco . cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment . aes 2019s investment in cesco is negative . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas for approximately $ 40 million . the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 . songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell 100% ( 100 % ) of our ownership interest in songas . the sale of songas closed in april 2003 ( see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction ) . the following tables present summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) of the entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2003</td><td>2002 ( 1 )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 2758</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 6147</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1039</td><td>695</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>407</td><td>229</td><td>650</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>1347</td><td>1097</td><td>3700</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>7479</td><td>6751</td><td>14942</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>1434</td><td>1418</td><td>3510</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>3795</td><td>3349</td><td>8297</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>3597</td><td>3081</td><td>6835</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes information pertaining to eletropaulo and light prior to february 2002 . in 2002 and 2001 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 . the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) and 19% ( 19 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the implied total value of medway power limited, based on the ownership stake sold and the deal value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "312.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6716	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nlocation approximate size ( sq . ft. ) segment majority owned or leased . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximatesize ( sq . ft. )</td><td>segment</td><td>majorityowned orleased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hamilton new zealand</td><td>96000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>calgary alberta canada</td><td>94000</td><td>global energy</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kwinana australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revesby australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>yangsan korea</td><td>85000</td><td>global energy global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cisterna italy</td><td>80000</td><td>global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rovigo italy</td><td>77000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>cuautitlan mexico</td><td>76000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>barueri brazil</td><td>75000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>mullingar ireland</td><td>74000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>mosta malta</td><td>73000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>leased</td></tr></table> generally , our manufacturing facilities are adequate to meet our existing in-house production needs . we continue to invest in our plant sites to maintain viable operations and to add capacity as necessary to meet business imperatives . most of our manufacturing plants also serve as distribution centers . in addition , we operate distribution centers around the world , most of which are leased , and utilize third party logistics service providers to facilitate the distribution of our products and services . at year end 2016 ecolab 2019s corporate headquarters was comprised of three adjacent multi-storied buildings located in downtown st . paul , minnesota . the main 19-story building was constructed to our specifications and is leased through june 30 , 2018 . the second building is leased through 2019 . the company intends to vacate the current leased buildings in 2018 . the third building is owned . ecolab acquired the 17-story north tower from the travelers indemnity company in downtown st . paul , minnesota on august 4 , 2015 . this building became the corporate headquarters in 2017 . a 90 acre campus in eagan , minnesota is owned and provides for future growth . the eagan facility houses a significant research and development center , a data center and training facilities as well as several of our administrative functions . we also have a significant business presence in naperville , illinois , where our water and paper operating segment maintain their principal administrative offices and research center . as discussed in part ii , item 8 , note 6 , 201cdebt and interest 201d of this form 10-k , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning these facilities during 2015 . our energy operating segment maintains administrative and research facilities in sugar land , texas and additional research facilities in fresno , texas . in december 2013 , we announced the construction of a new 133000 square-foot headquarters building adjacent to the existing sugar land operations which was completed in early 2016 and renovation of the existing 45000 square-foot research facilities in sugar land . significant regional administrative and/or research facilities are located in leiden , netherlands , campinas , brazil , and pune , india , which we own , and in monheim , germany , singapore , shanghai , china , and zurich , switzerland , which we lease . we also have a network of small leased sales offices in the united states and , to a lesser extent , in other parts of the world . item 3 . legal proceedings . discussion of legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from part ii , item 8 , note 15 , 201ccommitments and contingencies , 201d of this form 10-k and should be considered an integral part of part i , item 3 , 201clegal proceedings . 201d other environmental-related legal proceedings are discussed at part i , item 1 ( c ) above , under the heading 201cenvironmental and regulatory considerations 201d and is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .\nQuestion: how many square feet are leased by the company in barueri brazil?\nAnswer: 75000.0\nQuestion: and what is that number for mullingar ireland?\nAnswer: 74000.0\nQuestion: what is, then, the total square feet leased by the company in both locations?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "149000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9354	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( a ) the net change in the total valuation allowance for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 was an increase of $ 12 million and an increase of $ 26 million , respectively . deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under the captions deferred charges and other assets and deferred income taxes . there was a decrease in deferred income tax assets principally relating to the utilization of u.s . federal alternative minimum tax credits as permitted under tax reform . deferred tax liabilities increased primarily due to the tax deferral of the book gain recognized on the transfer of the north american consumer packaging business to a subsidiary of graphic packaging holding company . of the $ 1.5 billion of deferred tax liabilities for forestlands , related installment sales , and investment in subsidiary , $ 884 million is attributable to an investment in subsidiary and relates to a 2006 international paper installment sale of forestlands and $ 538 million is attributable to a 2007 temple-inland installment sale of forestlands ( see note 14 ) . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ -188 ( 188 )</td><td>$ -98 ( 98 )</td><td>$ -150 ( 150 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( additions ) reductions based on tax positions related to current year</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-54 ( 54 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>( additions ) for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-37 ( 37 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expiration of statutes oflimitations</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>currency translation adjustment</td><td>3</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ -220 ( 220 )</td><td>$ -188 ( 188 )</td><td>$ -98 ( 98 )</td></tr></table> if the company were to prevail on the unrecognized tax benefits recorded , substantially all of the balances at december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 would benefit the effective tax rate . the company accrues interest on unrecognized tax benefits as a component of interest expense . penalties , if incurred , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . the company had approximately $ 21 million and $ 17 million accrued for the payment of estimated interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the major jurisdictions where the company files income tax returns are the united states , brazil , france , poland and russia . generally , tax years 2006 through 2017 remain open and subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities . the company frequently faces challenges regarding the amount of taxes due . these challenges include positions taken by the company related to the timing , nature , and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions . pending audit settlements and the expiration of statute of limitations could reduce the uncertain tax positions by $ 30 million during the next twelve months . the brazilian federal revenue service has challenged the deductibility of goodwill amortization generated in a 2007 acquisition by international paper do brasil ltda. , a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company . the company received assessments for the tax years 2007-2015 totaling approximately $ 150 million in tax , and $ 380 million in interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2018 ( adjusted for variation in currency exchange rates ) . after a previous favorable ruling challenging the basis for these assessments , we received an unfavorable decision in october 2018 from the brazilian administrative council of tax appeals . the company intends to further appeal the matter in the brazilian federal courts in 2019 ; however , this tax litigation matter may take many years to resolve . the company believes that it has appropriately evaluated the transaction underlying these assessments , and has concluded based on brazilian tax law , that its tax position would be sustained . the company intends to vigorously defend its position against the current assessments and any similar assessments that may be issued for tax years subsequent to 2015 . international paper uses the flow-through method to account for investment tax credits earned on eligible open-loop biomass facilities and combined heat and power system expenditures . under this method , the investment tax credits are recognized as a reduction to income tax expense in the year they are earned rather than a reduction in the asset basis . the company recorded a tax benefit of $ 6 million during 2018 and recorded a tax benefit of $ 68 million during 2017 related to investment tax credits earned in tax years 2013-2017. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2017 to 2018?\nAnswer: 32.0\nQuestion: what is the unrecognized tax benefits in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "188.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10509	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsecured financing is primarily conducted through citi 2019s broker-dealer subsidiaries to facilitate customer matched-book activity and to efficiently fund a portion of the trading inventory . secured financing appears as a liability on citi 2019s consolidated balance sheet ( 201csecurities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase 201d ) . as of december 31 , 2010 , secured financing was $ 189.6 billion and averaged approximately $ 207 billion during the quarter ended december 31 , 2010 . secured financing at december 31 , 2010 increased by $ 35 billion from $ 154.3 billion at december 31 , 2009 . during the same period , reverse repos and securities borrowing increased by $ 25 billion . the majority of secured financing is collateralized by highly liquid government , government-backed and government agency securities . this collateral comes primarily from citi 2019s trading assets and its secured lending , and is part of citi 2019s client matched-book activity given that citi both borrows and lends similar asset types on a secured basis . the minority of secured financing is collateralized by less liquid collateral , and supports both citi 2019s trading assets as well as the business of secured lending to customers , which is also part of citi 2019s client matched-book activity . the less liquid secured borrowing is carefully calibrated by asset quality , tenor and counterparty exposure , including those that might be sensitive to ratings stresses , in order to increase the reliability of the funding . citi believes there are several potential mitigants available to it in the event of stress on the secured financing markets for less liquid collateral . citi 2019s significant liquidity resources in its non-bank entities as of december 31 , 2010 , supplemented by collateralized liquidity transfers between entities , provide a cushion . within the matched-book activity , the secured lending positions , which are carefully managed in terms of collateral and tenor , could be unwound to provide additional liquidity under stress . citi also has excess funding capacity for less liquid collateral with existing counterparties that can be accessed during potential dislocation . in addition , citi has the ability to adjust the size of select trading books to provide further mitigation . at december 31 , 2010 , commercial paper outstanding for citigroup 2019s non- bank entities and bank subsidiaries , respectively , was as follows : in billions of dollars non-bank bank ( 1 ) citigroup . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>non-bank</td><td>bank</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>total citigroup</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commercial paper</td><td>$ 9.7</td><td>$ 15.0</td><td>-</td><td>$ 24.7</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 15 billion of commercial paper related to vies consolidated effective january 1 , 2010 with the adoption of sfas 166/167 . other short-term borrowings of approximately $ 54 billion ( as set forth in the secured financing and short-term borrowings table above ) include $ 42.4 billion of borrowings from banks and other market participants , which includes borrowings from the federal home loan banks . this represented a decrease of approximately $ 11 billion as compared to year-end 2009 . the average balance of borrowings from banks and other market participants for the quarter ended december 31 , 2010 was approximately $ 43 billion . other short-term borrowings also include $ 11.7 billion of broker borrowings at december 31 , 2010 , which averaged approximately $ 13 billion for the quarter ended december 31 , 2010 . see notes 12 and 19 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on citigroup 2019s and its affiliates 2019 outstanding long-term debt and short-term borrowings . liquidity transfer between entities liquidity is generally transferable within the non-bank , subject to regulatory restrictions ( if any ) and standard legal terms . similarly , the non-bank can generally transfer excess liquidity into citi 2019s bank subsidiaries , such as citibank , n.a . in addition , citigroup 2019s bank subsidiaries , including citibank , n.a. , can lend to the citigroup parent and broker-dealer in accordance with section 23a of the federal reserve act . as of december 31 , 2010 , the amount available for lending under section 23a was approximately $ 26.6 billion , provided the funds are collateralized appropriately. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2010, what percentage of commercial paper outstanding was due to non-bank subsidiaries?\nAnswer: 0.39271\nQuestion: and what percentage was due to bank subsidiaries?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.60729" } ]
CONVFINQA3955	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following is a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the year : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>unrecognized tax benefit 2014january 1 2008</td><td>$ 7928</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ansoft unrecognized tax benefit 2014acquired july 31 2008</td><td>3525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2014tax positions in prior period</td><td>2454</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2014tax positions in prior period</td><td>-1572 ( 1572 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2014tax positions in current period</td><td>2255</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions due to a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-1598 ( 1598 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>changes due to currency fluctuation</td><td>-259 ( 259 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>-317 ( 317 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>unrecognized tax benefit 2014december 31 2008</td><td>$ 12416</td></tr></table> included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.6 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate . also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.0 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in a decrease to goodwill recorded in purchase business combinations , and $ 1.9 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in adjustments to other tax accounts , primarily deferred taxes . the company believes it is reasonably possible that uncertain tax positions of approximately $ 2.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 will be resolved within the next twelve months . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense . related to the uncertain tax benefits noted above , the company recorded interest of $ 171000 during 2008 . penalties recorded during 2008 were insignificant . in total , as of december 31 , 2008 , the company has recognized a liability for penalties of $ 498000 and interest of $ 1.8 million . the company is subject to taxation in the u.s . and various states and foreign jurisdictions . the company 2019s 2005 through 2008 tax years are open to examination by the internal revenue service . the 2005 and 2006 federal returns are currently under examination . the company also has various foreign subsidiaries with tax filings under examination , as well as numerous foreign and state tax filings subject to examination for various years . 10 . pension and profit-sharing plans the company has 401 ( k ) /profit-sharing plans for all qualifying full-time domestic employees that permit participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to section 401 ( k ) of the internal revenue code . the company makes matching contributions on behalf of each eligible participant in an amount equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the first 3% ( 3 % ) and an additional 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 5% ( 5 % ) , for a maximum total of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) of the employee 2019s compensation . the company may make a discretionary profit sharing contribution in the amount of 0% ( 0 % ) to 5% ( 5 % ) based on the participant 2019s eligible compensation , provided the employee is employed at the end of the year and has worked at least 1000 hours . the qualifying domestic employees of the company 2019s ansoft subsidiary , acquired on july 31 , 2008 , also participate in a 401 ( k ) plan . there is no matching employer contribution associated with this plan . the company also maintains various defined contribution pension arrangements for its international employees . expenses related to the company 2019s retirement programs were $ 3.7 million in 2008 , $ 4.7 million in 2007 and $ 4.1 million in 2006 . 11 . non-compete and employment agreements employees of the company have signed agreements under which they have agreed not to disclose trade secrets or confidential information and , where legally permitted , that restrict engagement in or connection with any business that is competitive with the company anywhere in the world while employed by the company ( and .\nQuestion: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits\nAnswer: 4488.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.56609" } ]
CONVFINQA7409	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the units consisted of ( i ) approximately 81.8 million preferred a units par value $ 1.00 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the preferred a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after one year or callable by the company any time after six months and contain a promote feature based upon an increase in net operating income of the properties capped at a 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) increase , ( ii ) 2000 class a preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to libor plus 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) per annum on the class a preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , ( iii ) 2627 class b-1 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-1 preferred par value and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock , equal to the cash redemption amount , as defined , ( iv ) 5673 class b-2 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-2 preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , and ( v ) 640001 class c downreit units , valued at an issuance price of $ 30.52 per unit which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock equal to the class c cash amount , as defined . the following units have been redeemed as of december 31 , 2010 : redeemed par value redeemed ( in millions ) redemption type . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>units redeemed</td><td>par value redeemed ( in millions )</td><td>redemption type</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>preferred a units</td><td>2200000</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a preferred units</td><td>2000</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 preferred units</td><td>2438</td><td>$ 24.4</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 preferred units</td><td>5576</td><td>$ 55.8</td><td>cash/charitable contribution</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class c downreit units</td><td>61804</td><td>$ 1.9</td><td>cash</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $ 110.4 million and $ 113.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2006 , the company acquired two shopping center properties located in bay shore and centereach , ny . included in noncontrolling interests was approximately $ 41.6 million , including a discount of $ 0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $ 3.8 million , in redeemable units ( the 201credeemable units 201d ) , issued by the company in connection with these transactions . the prop- erties were acquired through the issuance of $ 24.2 million of redeemable units , which are redeemable at the option of the holder ; approximately $ 14.0 million of fixed rate redeemable units and the assumption of approximately $ 23.4 million of non-recourse debt . the redeemable units consist of ( i ) 13963 class a units , par value $ 1000 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 5% ( 5 % ) per annum of the class a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2011 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2016 , and ( ii ) 647758 class b units , valued at an issuance price of $ 37.24 per unit , which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2007 , for cash or at the option of the company for common stock at a ratio of 1:1 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2026 . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until april 2016 and april 2026 for the centereach , ny , and bay shore , ny , assets , respectively . during 2007 , 30000 units , or $ 1.1 million par value , of theclass bunits were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the company . noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $ 40.4 million and $ 40.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . noncontrolling interests also includes 138015 convertible units issued during 2006 , by the company , which were valued at approxi- mately $ 5.3 million , including a fair market value adjustment of $ 0.3 million , related to an interest acquired in an office building located in albany , ny . these units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the company for the company 2019s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 . the holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the company 2019s common stock . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until january 2017. .\nQuestion: what was the value of noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units in 2010?\nAnswer: 110.4\nQuestion: what was the value in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "113.1" } ]
CONVFINQA7946	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to the base rate increases and the volume/weather effect , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in demand coupled with an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of lower fuel refunds in 2011 versus 2010 , partially offset by a decrease in the average market price of natural gas . other regulatory charges decreased primarily due to the distribution in the first quarter 2011 of $ 17.4 million to customers of the 2007 rough production cost equalization remedy receipts . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rough production cost equalization proceedings . 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 485.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>27.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>27.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rough production cost equalization</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>16.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-44.3 ( 44.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-5.7 ( 5.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 540.2</td></tr></table> the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to increased sales to municipal and co-op customers due to the addition of new contracts . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , resulting from a 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) increase in customers , coupled with the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . billed electricity usage increased a total of 777 gwh , or 5% ( 5 % ) . the rough production cost equalization variance is due to an additional $ 18.6 million allocation recorded in the second quarter of 2009 for 2007 rough production cost equalization receipts ordered by the puct to texas retail customers over what was originally allocated to entergy texas prior to the jurisdictional separation of entergy gulf states , inc . into entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , effective december 2007 , as discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in november 2009 , entergy texas restoration funding , llc , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the securitization transition charge is offset with a corresponding increase in interest on long-term debt with no impact on net income . see note 5 to the financial statements for further discussion of the securitization bond issuance. .\nQuestion: what was the net revenue in 2010?\nAnswer: 540.2\nQuestion: and what was it in 2009?\nAnswer: 485.1\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 55.1\nQuestion: and what percentage does this change represent in relation to that 2009 net revenue?\nAnswer: 0.11358\nQuestion: and from that change over the year, what percentage of it is due to the net wholesale revenue?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.50272" } ]
CONVFINQA4904	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunited parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 807</td><td>$ 3804</td><td>$ 3338</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash operating activities ( a )</td><td>7301</td><td>4505</td><td>4398</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans )</td><td>-917 ( 917 )</td><td>-1436 ( 1436 )</td><td>-3240 ( 3240 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax receivables and payables</td><td>280</td><td>236</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities</td><td>-148 ( 148 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-340 ( 340 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other operating activities</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 7216</td><td>$ 7073</td><td>$ 3835</td></tr></table> ( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items . cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2010 to 2012 time period . operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2012 , compared with 2011 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by changes in our working capital position , which was impacted by overall growth in the business . the change in the cash flows for income tax receivables and payables in 2011 and 2010 was primarily related to the timing of discretionary pension contributions during 2010 , as discussed further in the following paragraph . except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans . 2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan . 2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 . 2022 in 2010 , we made $ 2.0 billion in discretionary contributions to our ups retirement and ups pension plans , and $ 980 million in required contributions to our ups ibt pension plan . 2022 the remaining contributions in the 2010 through 2012 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s . postretirement medical benefit plans . as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 7.327 billion . approximately $ 4.211 billion of this amount was held in european subsidiaries with the intended purpose of completing the acquisition of tnt express n.v . ( see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements ) . excluding this portion of cash held outside the u.s . for acquisition-related purposes , approximately 50%-60% ( 50%-60 % ) of the remaining cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year . the amount of cash held by our u.s . and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business . cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners . to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s . when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .\nQuestion: what was the net income in 2012?\nAnswer: 807.0\nQuestion: and what was it in the previous year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3804.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5641	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npurchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .\nQuestion: what was alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in 2014?\nAnswer: 3743.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3514.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5818	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company has a restricted stock plan for non-employee directors which reserves for issuance of 300000 shares of the company 2019s common stock . no restricted shares were issued in 2009 . the company has a directors 2019 deferral plan , which provides a means to defer director compensation , from time to time , on a deferred stock or cash basis . as of september 30 , 2009 , 86643 shares were held in trust , of which 4356 shares represented directors 2019 compensation in 2009 , in accordance with the provisions of the plan . under this plan , which is unfunded , directors have an unsecured contractual commitment from the company . the company also has a deferred compensation plan that allows certain highly-compensated employees , including executive officers , to defer salary , annual incentive awards and certain equity-based compensation . as of september 30 , 2009 , 557235 shares were issuable under this plan . note 16 2014 earnings per share the weighted average common shares used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share ( shares in thousands ) for the years ended september 30 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average common shares outstanding</td><td>240479</td><td>244323</td><td>244929</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dilutive share equivalents from share-based plans</td><td>6319</td><td>8358</td><td>9881</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average common and common equivalent sharesoutstanding 2014 assuming dilution</td><td>246798</td><td>252681</td><td>254810</td></tr></table> average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 2014 assuming dilution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246798 252681 254810 note 17 2014 segment data the company 2019s organizational structure is based upon its three principal business segments : bd medical ( 201cmedical 201d ) , bd diagnostics ( 201cdiagnostics 201d ) and bd biosciences ( 201cbiosciences 201d ) . the principal product lines in the medical segment include needles , syringes and intravenous catheters for medication delivery ; safety-engineered and auto-disable devices ; prefilled iv flush syringes ; syringes and pen needles for the self-injection of insulin and other drugs used in the treatment of diabetes ; prefillable drug delivery devices provided to pharmaceutical companies and sold to end-users as drug/device combinations ; surgical blades/scalpels and regional anesthesia needles and trays ; critical care monitoring devices ; ophthalmic surgical instruments ; and sharps disposal containers . the principal products and services in the diagnostics segment include integrated systems for specimen collection ; an extensive line of safety-engineered specimen blood collection products and systems ; plated media ; automated blood culturing systems ; molecular testing systems for sexually transmitted diseases and healthcare-associated infections ; microorganism identification and drug susceptibility systems ; liquid-based cytology systems for cervical cancer screening ; and rapid diagnostic assays . the principal product lines in the biosciences segment include fluorescence activated cell sorters and analyzers ; cell imaging systems ; monoclonal antibodies and kits for performing cell analysis ; reagent systems for life sciences research ; tools to aid in drug discovery and growth of tissue and cells ; cell culture media supplements for biopharmaceutical manufacturing ; and diagnostic assays . the company evaluates performance of its business segments based upon operating income . segment operating income represents revenues reduced by product costs and operating expenses . the company hedges against certain forecasted sales of u.s.-produced products sold outside the united states . gains and losses associated with these foreign currency translation hedges are reported in segment revenues based upon their proportionate share of these international sales of u.s.-produced products . becton , dickinson and company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what were the number of common shares outstanding in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "244323.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8782	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naltria group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements _________________________ may not be obtainable in all cases . this risk has been substantially reduced given that 47 states and puerto rico limit the dollar amount of bonds or require no bond at all . as discussed below , however , tobacco litigation plaintiffs have challenged the constitutionality of florida 2019s bond cap statute in several cases and plaintiffs may challenge state bond cap statutes in other jurisdictions as well . such challenges may include the applicability of state bond caps in federal court . states , including florida , may also seek to repeal or alter bond cap statutes through legislation . although altria group , inc . cannot predict the outcome of such challenges , it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome of one or more such challenges . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when they determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , except to the extent discussed elsewhere in this note 19 . contingencies : ( i ) management has concluded that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , management has not provided any amounts in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes , if any . litigation defense costs are expensed as incurred . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries have achieved substantial success in managing litigation . nevertheless , litigation is subject to uncertainty and significant challenges remain . it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation . altria group , inc . and each of its subsidiaries named as a defendant believe , and each has been so advised by counsel handling the respective cases , that it has valid defenses to the litigation pending against it , as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts . each of the companies has defended , and will continue to defend , vigorously against litigation challenges . however , altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions in particular cases if they believe it is in the best interests of altria group , inc . to do so . overview of altria group , inc . and/or pm usa tobacco- related litigation types and number of cases : claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories : ( i ) smoking and health cases alleging personal injury brought on behalf of individual plaintiffs ; ( ii ) smoking and health cases primarily alleging personal injury or seeking court-supervised programs for ongoing medical monitoring and purporting to be brought on behalf of a class of individual plaintiffs , including cases in which the aggregated claims of a number of individual plaintiffs are to be tried in a single proceeding ; ( iii ) health care cost recovery cases brought by governmental ( both domestic and foreign ) plaintiffs seeking reimbursement for health care expenditures allegedly caused by cigarette smoking and/or disgorgement of profits ; ( iv ) class action suits alleging that the uses of the terms 201clights 201d and 201cultra lights 201d constitute deceptive and unfair trade practices , common law or statutory fraud , unjust enrichment , breach of warranty or violations of the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act ( 201crico 201d ) ; and ( v ) other tobacco-related litigation described below . plaintiffs 2019 theories of recovery and the defenses raised in pending smoking and health , health care cost recovery and 201clights/ultra lights 201d cases are discussed below . the table below lists the number of certain tobacco-related cases pending in the united states against pm usa ( 1 ) and , in some instances , altria group , inc . as of december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>individual smoking and health cases ( 2 )</td><td>70</td><td>65</td><td>67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation ( 3 )</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>health care cost recovery actions ( 4 )</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions</td><td>8</td><td>11</td><td>12</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include 25 cases filed on the asbestos docket in the circuit court for baltimore city , maryland , which seek to join pm usa and other cigarette- manufacturing defendants in complaints previously filed against asbestos companies . ( 2 ) does not include 2485 cases brought by flight attendants seeking compensatory damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke ( 201cets 201d ) . the flight attendants allege that they are members of an ets smoking and health class action in florida , which was settled in 1997 ( broin ) . the terms of the court-approved settlement in that case allowed class members to file individual lawsuits seeking compensatory damages , but prohibited them from seeking punitive damages . also , does not include individual smoking and health cases brought by or on behalf of plaintiffs in florida state and federal courts following the decertification of the engle case ( discussed below in smoking and health litigation - engle class action ) . ( 3 ) includes as one case the 600 civil actions ( of which 344 were actions against pm usa ) that were to be tried in a single proceeding in west virginia ( in re : tobacco litigation ) . the west virginia supreme court of appeals ruled that the united states constitution did not preclude a trial in two phases in this case . issues related to defendants 2019 conduct and whether punitive damages are permissible were tried in the first phase . trial in the first phase of this case began in april 2013 . in may 2013 , the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants on the claims for design defect , negligence , failure to warn , breach of warranty , and concealment and declined to find that the defendants 2019 conduct warranted punitive damages . plaintiffs prevailed on their claim that ventilated filter cigarettes should have included use instructions for the period 1964 - 1969 . the second phase will consist of trials to determine liability and compensatory damages . in november 2014 , the west virginia supreme court of appeals affirmed the final judgment . in july 2015 , the trial court entered an order that will result in the entry of final judgment in favor of defendants and against all but 30 plaintiffs who potentially have a claim against one or more defendants that may be pursued in a second phase of trial . the court intends to try the claims of these 30 plaintiffs in six consolidated trials , each with a group of five plaintiffs . the first trial is currently scheduled to begin may 1 , 2018 . dates for the five remaining consolidated trials have not been scheduled . ( 4 ) see health care cost recovery litigation - federal government 2019s lawsuit below. .\nQuestion: how many cases related to smoking are pending as of 12/31/16?\nAnswer: 75.0\nQuestion: what about related to recovery actions?\nAnswer: 1.0\nQuestion: what is the total of these cases?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "76.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8935	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvornado realty trust 77 cash flows the company expects to contribute $ 959000 to the plans in 2004 . 11 . leases as lessor : the company leases space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . shopping center leases provide for the pass-through to tenants of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse the company for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2003 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 1084934</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>968162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>846345</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>770228</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>608267</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>3423083</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 3662000 , $ 1832000 , and $ 2157000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 . except for the u.s . government , which accounted for 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) of the company 2019s revenue , none of the company 2019s tenants represented more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . former bradlees locations property rentals for the year ended december 31 , 2003 , include $ 5000000 of additional rent which , effective december 31 , 2002 , was re-allocated to the former bradlees locations in marlton , turnersville , bensalem and broomall and is payable by stop & shop , pursuant to the master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 . this amount is in addition to all other rent guaranteed by stop & shop for the former bradlees locations . on january 8 , 2003 , stop & shop filed a complaint with the united states district court claiming the company has no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $ 5000000 of annual rent from stop & shop because of the expiration of the east brunswick , jersey city , middletown , union and woodbridge leases to which the $ 5000000 of additional rent was previously allocated . the company believes the additional rent provision of the guaranty expires at the earliest in 2012 and will vigorously oppose stop & shop 2019s complaint . in february 2003 , koninklijke ahold nv , parent of stop & shop , announced that it overstated its 2002 and 2001 earnings by at least $ 500 million and is under investigation by the u.s . justice department and securities and exchange commission . the company cannot predict what effect , if any , this situation may have on stop & shop 2019s ability to satisfy its obligation under the bradlees guarantees and rent for existing stop & shop leases aggregating approximately $ 10.5 million per annum . notes to consolidated financial statements sr-176_fin_l02p53_82v1.qxd 4/8/04 2:42 pm page 77 .\nQuestion: what was the percentage rent in 2002, in thousands?\nAnswer: 1832000.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2001?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2157000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9957	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe intrinsic value of restricted stock awards vested during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 25 million , $ 31 million and $ 17 million , respectively . restricted stock awards made to employees have vesting periods ranging from 1 year with variable vesting dates to 10 years . following is a summary of the future vesting of our outstanding restricted stock awards : vesting of restricted shares . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>vesting of restricted shares</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>1476832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>2352443</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>4358728</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>539790</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>199850</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>110494</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total outstanding</td><td>9038137</td></tr></table> the related compensation costs less estimated forfeitures is generally recognized ratably over the vesting period of the restricted stock awards . upon vesting , the grants will be paid in our class p common shares . during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , we recorded $ 66 million , $ 52 million and $ 51 million , respectively , in expense related to restricted stock awards and capitalized approximately $ 9 million , $ 15 million and $ 6 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , unrecognized restricted stock awards compensation costs , less estimated forfeitures , was approximately $ 133 million and $ 154 million , respectively . pension and other postretirement benefit plans savings plan we maintain a defined contribution plan covering eligible u.s . employees . we contribute 5% ( 5 % ) of eligible compensation for most of the plan participants . certain plan participants 2019 contributions and company contributions are based on collective bargaining agreements . the total expense for our savings plan was approximately $ 48 million , $ 46 million , and $ 42 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . pension plans our u.s . pension plan is a defined benefit plan that covers substantially all of our u.s . employees and provides benefits under a cash balance formula . a participant in the cash balance plan accrues benefits through contribution credits based on a combination of age and years of service , times eligible compensation . interest is also credited to the participant 2019s plan account . a participant becomes fully vested in the plan after three years , and may take a lump sum distribution upon termination of employment or retirement . certain collectively bargained and grandfathered employees continue to accrue benefits through career pay or final pay formulas . two of our subsidiaries , kinder morgan canada inc . and trans mountain pipeline inc . ( as general partner of trans mountain pipeline l.p. ) , are sponsors of pension plans for eligible canadian and trans mountain pipeline employees . the plans include registered defined benefit pension plans , supplemental unfunded arrangements ( which provide pension benefits in excess of statutory limits ) and defined contributory plans . benefits under the defined benefit components accrue through career pay or final pay formulas . the net periodic benefit costs , contributions and liability amounts associated with our canadian plans are not material to our consolidated income statements or balance sheets ; however , we began to include the activity and balances associated with our canadian plans ( including our canadian opeb plans discussed below ) in the following disclosures on a prospective basis beginning in 2016 . the associated net periodic benefit costs for these combined canadian plans of $ 12 million and $ 10 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , were reported separately in prior years . other postretirement benefit plans we and certain of our u.s . subsidiaries provide other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) , including medical benefits for closed groups of retired employees and certain grandfathered employees and their dependents , and limited postretirement life insurance benefits for retired employees . our canadian subsidiaries also provide opeb benefits to current and future retirees and their dependents . medical benefits under these opeb plans may be subject to deductibles , co-payment provisions , dollar .\nQuestion: what is the number of restricted shares that is supposed to vest after 2021?\nAnswer: 110494.0\nQuestion: and what is the total number of restricted shares?\nAnswer: 9038137.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total number do those shares represent?\nAnswer: 0.01223\nQuestion: and what percentage do the restricted shares supposed to vest in 2018 represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.26028" } ]
CONVFINQA6156	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying rr values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . during 2016 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying rr amount of $ 643 million were written down to their fair value of $ 527 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 116 million . impairments in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 211 million , $ 291 million and $ 288 million during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount at beginning of period</td><td>$ 912926</td><td>$ 811554</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred ( 1 )</td><td>54764</td><td>212739</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled ( 2 )</td><td>-61871 ( 61871 )</td><td>-94800 ( 94800 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>34708</td><td>32306</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions</td><td>-9818 ( 9818 )</td><td>-38286 ( 38286 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign currency translations</td><td>16139</td><td>-10587 ( 10587 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>carrying amount at end of period</td><td>$ 946848</td><td>$ 912926</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>current portion</td><td>$ 19259</td><td>$ 18516</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noncurrent portion</td><td>$ 927589</td><td>$ 894410</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 164 million in 2016 related to yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . ( 2 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .\nQuestion: what is the ratio of 2017 accretion to 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.07435" } ]
CONVFINQA5067	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements minority partner approves the annual budget , receives a detailed monthly reporting package from us , meets with us on a quarterly basis to review the results of the joint venture , reviews and approves the joint venture 2019s tax return before filing , and approves all leases that cover more than a nominal amount of space relative to the total rentable space at each property we do not consolidate the joint venture as we consider these to be substantive participation rights . our joint venture agreements also contain certain pro- tective rights such as the requirement of partner approval to sell , finance or refinance the property and the payment of capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan . the table below provides general information on each joint venture as of december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) : property partner ownership interest economic interest square feet acquired acquisition price ( 1 ) 1221 avenue of the americas ( 2 ) rgii 45.00% ( 45.00 % ) 45.00% ( 45.00 % ) 2550 12/03 $ 1000000 1515 broadway ( 3 ) sitq 55.00% ( 55.00 % ) 68.45% ( 68.45 % ) 1750 05/02 $ 483500 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>property</td><td>partner</td><td>ownership interest</td><td>economic interest</td><td>square feet</td><td>acquired</td><td>acquisition price ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1221 avenue of the americas ( 2 )</td><td>rgii</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>2550</td><td>12/03</td><td>$ 1000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1515 broadway ( 3 )</td><td>sitq</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>68.45% ( 68.45 % )</td><td>1750</td><td>05/02</td><td>$ 483500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>100 park avenue</td><td>prudential</td><td>49.90% ( 49.90 % )</td><td>49.90% ( 49.90 % )</td><td>834</td><td>02/00</td><td>$ 95800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>379 west broadway</td><td>sutton</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>62</td><td>12/05</td><td>$ 19750</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>21 west 34thstreet ( 4 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>30</td><td>07/05</td><td>$ 22400</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>800 third avenue ( 5 )</td><td>private investors</td><td>42.95% ( 42.95 % )</td><td>42.95% ( 42.95 % )</td><td>526</td><td>12/06</td><td>$ 285000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>521 fifth avenue</td><td>cif</td><td>50.10% ( 50.10 % )</td><td>50.10% ( 50.10 % )</td><td>460</td><td>12/06</td><td>$ 240000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>one court square</td><td>jp morgan</td><td>30.00% ( 30.00 % )</td><td>30.00% ( 30.00 % )</td><td>1402</td><td>01/07</td><td>$ 533500</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>1604-1610 broadway ( 6 )</td><td>onyx/sutton</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>63.00% ( 63.00 % )</td><td>30</td><td>11/05</td><td>$ 4400</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1745 broadway ( 7 )</td><td>witkoff/sitq/lehman bros .</td><td>32.26% ( 32.26 % )</td><td>32.26% ( 32.26 % )</td><td>674</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 520000</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>1 and 2 jericho plaza</td><td>onyx/credit suisse</td><td>20.26% ( 20.26 % )</td><td>20.26% ( 20.26 % )</td><td>640</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 210000</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>2 herald square ( 8 )</td><td>gramercy</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>354</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 225000</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>885 third avenue ( 9 )</td><td>gramercy</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>607</td><td>07/07</td><td>$ 317000</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>16 court street</td><td>cif</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td><td>318</td><td>07/07</td><td>$ 107500</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>the meadows ( 10 )</td><td>onyx</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>582</td><td>09/07</td><td>$ 111500</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>388 and 390 greenwich street ( 11 )</td><td>sitq</td><td>50.60% ( 50.60 % )</td><td>50.60% ( 50.60 % )</td><td>2600</td><td>12/07</td><td>$ 1575000</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>27-29 west 34thstreet ( 12 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>41</td><td>01/06</td><td>$ 30000</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>1551-1555 broadway ( 13 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>10.00% ( 10.00 % )</td><td>10.00% ( 10.00 % )</td><td>26</td><td>07/05</td><td>$ 80100</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>717 fifth avenue ( 14 )</td><td>sutton/nakash</td><td>32.75% ( 32.75 % )</td><td>32.75% ( 32.75 % )</td><td>120</td><td>09/06</td><td>$ 251900</td></tr></table> the meadows ( 10 ) onyx 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 582 09/07 $ 111500 388 and 390 greenwich street ( 11 ) sitq 50.60% ( 50.60 % ) 50.60% ( 50.60 % ) 2600 12/07 $ 1575000 27 201329 west 34th street ( 12 ) sutton 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 41 01/06 $ 30000 1551 20131555 broadway ( 13 ) sutton 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) 26 07/05 $ 80100 717 fifth avenue ( 14 ) sutton/nakash 32.75% ( 32.75 % ) 32.75% ( 32.75 % ) 120 09/06 $ 251900 ( 1 ) acquisition price represents the actual or implied purchase price for the joint venture . ( 2 ) we acquired our interest from the mcgraw-hill companies , or mhc . mhc is a tenant at the property and accounted for approximately 14.7% ( 14.7 % ) of the property 2019s annualized rent at december 31 , 2009 . we do not manage this joint venture . ( 3 ) under a tax protection agreement established to protect the limited partners of the partnership that transferred 1515 broadway to the joint venture , the joint venture has agreed not to adversely affect the limited partners 2019 tax positions before december 2011 . one tenant , whose leases primarily ends in 2015 , represents approximately 77.4% ( 77.4 % ) of this joint venture 2019s annualized rent at december 31 , 2009 . ( 4 ) effective november 2006 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 5 ) we invested approximately $ 109.5 million in this asset through the origination of a loan secured by up to 47% ( 47 % ) of the interests in the property 2019s ownership , with an option to convert the loan to an equity interest . certain existing members have the right to re-acquire approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the property 2019s equity . these interests were re-acquired in december 2008 and reduced our interest to 42.95% ( 42.95 % ) ( 6 ) effective april 2007 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 7 ) we have the ability to syndicate our interest down to 14.79% ( 14.79 % ) . ( 8 ) we , along with gramercy , together as tenants-in-common , acquired a fee interest in 2 herald square . the fee interest is subject to a long-term operating lease . ( 9 ) we , along with gramercy , together as tenants-in-common , acquired a fee and leasehold interest in 885 third avenue . the fee and leasehold interests are subject to a long-term operating lease . ( 10 ) we , along with onyx acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) interest on a pro-rata basis in september 2009 . ( 11 ) the property is subject to a 13-year triple-net lease arrangement with a single tenant . ( 12 ) effective may 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 13 ) effective august 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the sale of 80% ( 80 % ) of our interest , the joint venture was no longer a vie . ( 14 ) effective september 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary. .\nQuestion: what was the acquisition of 100 park avenue, converted to the ten millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "95800000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1391	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninformation about stock options at december 31 , 2007 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2007shares in thousandsrange of exercise prices</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>options outstanding weighted- averageexercise price</td><td>options outstanding weighted-average remaining contractual life ( in years )</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 37.43 2013 $ 46.99</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td><td>4.0</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>47.00 2013 56.99</td><td>3634</td><td>53.43</td><td>5.4</td><td>3022</td><td>53.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>57.00 2013 66.99</td><td>3255</td><td>60.32</td><td>5.2</td><td>2569</td><td>58.96</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>67.00 2013 76.23</td><td>5993</td><td>73.03</td><td>5.5</td><td>3461</td><td>73.45</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>14326</td><td>$ 62.15</td><td>5.3</td><td>10496</td><td>$ 59.95</td></tr></table> ( a ) the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 4.2 years . at december 31 , 2007 , there were approximately 13788000 options in total that were vested and are expected to vest . the weighted-average exercise price of such options was $ 62.07 per share , the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 5.2 years , and the aggregate intrinsic value at december 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 92 million . stock options granted in 2005 include options for 30000 shares that were granted to non-employee directors that year . no such options were granted in 2006 or 2007 . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2007 include 20944 deferred stock units awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment under sfas 123r until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vestings or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on all awarded units on the date of grant . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 11.37 , $ 10.75 and $ 9.83 per option , respectively . to determine stock-based compensation expense under sfas 123r , the grant-date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction made for estimated forfeitures . at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 options for 10743000 and 13582000 shares of common stock , respectively , were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 58.38 and $ 56.58 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 52 million , $ 111 million and $ 31 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2007 the aggregate intrinsic value of all options outstanding and exercisable was $ 94 million and $ 87 million , respectively . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 111 million , $ 233 million and $ 98 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 39 million , $ 82 million and $ 34 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2007 , 2006 or 2005 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 40116726 at december 31 , 2007 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 41787400 shares at december 31 , 2007 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans , the employee stock purchase plan as described below , and a director plan . during 2007 , we issued approximately 2.1 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we intend to utilize treasury stock for future stock option exercises . as discussed in note 1 accounting policies , we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of sfas 123 prospectively to all employee awards including stock options granted , modified or settled after january 1 , 2003 . as permitted under sfas 123 , we recognized compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . total compensation expense recognized related to pnc stock options in 2007 was $ 29 million compared with $ 31 million in 2006 and $ 29 million in 2005 . pro forma effects a table is included in note 1 accounting policies that sets forth pro forma net income and basic and diluted earnings per share as if compensation expense had been recognized under sfas 123 and 123r , as amended , for stock options for 2005 . for purposes of computing stock option expense and 2005 pro forma results , we estimated the fair value of stock options using the black-scholes option pricing model . the model requires the use of numerous assumptions , many of which are very subjective . therefore , the 2005 pro forma results are estimates of results of operations as if compensation expense had been recognized for all stock-based compensation awards and are not indicative of the impact on future periods. .\nQuestion: what was the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "52.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1859	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes receivable in 2014 , we entered into a $ 3.0 million promissory note with a privately held company which was recorded at cost . the interest rate on the promissory note is 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and is payable quarterly . all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the promissory note is due and payable on the earlier of august 26 , 2017 , or upon default . 5 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we lease various operating spaces in north america , europe , asia and australia under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements that expire on various dates through 2024 . these arrangements require us to pay certain operating expenses , such as taxes , repairs , and insurance and contain renewal and escalation clauses . we recognize rent expense under these arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease . as of december 31 , 2015 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 6306</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>6678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>6260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>5809</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>5580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21450</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 52083</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 6.7 million , $ 3.3 million and $ 3.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction such as our financial involvement in structural elements of asset construction , making decisions related to tenant improvement costs and purchasing insurance not reimbursable by the buyer-lessor ( the landlord ) , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction completion and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . due to our continued involvement in the property and lack of transferability of related risks and rewards of ownership to the landlord post construction , we account for the building and related improvements as a lease financing obligation . accordingly , as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 42.5 million and $ 43.6 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.3 million and $ 41.2 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation included in rent expense above , amounted to $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . there was no land lease expense for the year ended december 31 , 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the minimum payment for operating leases in 2016, converted to single digits?\nAnswer: 6.306\nQuestion: and the difference between this value and the rent expense for all operating leases in 2015?\nAnswer: -0.394\nQuestion: and the value for 2015 specifically?\nAnswer: 6.7\nQuestion: so what is the growth rate during this period?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.05881" } ]
CONVFINQA48	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>attala costs</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>6.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>base revenue</td><td>5.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-4.0 ( 4.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-2.7 ( 2.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 498.8</td></tr></table> the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in \"liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital\" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in \"state and local rate regulation\" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .\nQuestion: what is the difference between the net revenue of 2008 and 2007?\nAnswer: 11.9\nQuestion: how much does that difference represents in relation to the net revenue of 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.02444" } ]
CONVFINQA8472	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nleases , was $ 92 million , $ 80 million , and $ 72 million in 2002 , 2001 , and 2000 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 28 , 2002 , are as follows ( in millions ) : concentrations in the available sources of supply of materials and product although certain components essential to the company's business are generally available from multiple sources , other key components ( including microprocessors and application-specific integrated circuits , or ( \"asics\" ) ) are currently obtained by the company from single or limited sources . some other key components , while currently available to the company from multiple sources , are at times subject to industry- wide availability and pricing pressures . in addition , the company uses some components that are not common to the rest of the personal computer industry , and new products introduced by the company often initially utilize custom components obtained from only one source until the company has evaluated whether there is a need for and subsequently qualifies additional suppliers . if the supply of a key single-sourced component to the company were to be delayed or curtailed or in the event a key manufacturing vendor delays shipments of completed products to the company , the company's ability to ship related products in desired quantities and in a timely manner could be adversely affected . the company's business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source , or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source . continued availability of these components may be affected if producers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the company's requirements . finally , significant portions of the company's cpus , logic boards , and assembled products are now manufactured by outsourcing partners , the majority of which occurs in various parts of asia . although the company works closely with its outsourcing partners on manufacturing schedules and levels , the company's operating results could be adversely affected if its outsourcing partners were unable to meet their production obligations . contingencies beginning on september 27 , 2001 , three shareholder class action lawsuits were filed in the united states district court for the northern district of california against the company and its chief executive officer . these lawsuits are substantially identical , and purport to bring suit on behalf of persons who purchased the company's publicly traded common stock between july 19 , 2000 , and september 28 , 2000 . the complaints allege violations of the 1934 securities exchange act and seek unspecified compensatory damages and other relief . the company believes these claims are without merit and intends to defend them vigorously . the company filed a motion to dismiss on june 4 , 2002 , which was heard by the court on september 13 , 2002 . on december 11 , 2002 , the court granted the company's motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action , with leave to plaintiffs to amend their complaint within thirty days . the company is subject to certain other legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated . in the opinion of management , the company does not have a potential liability related to any current legal proceedings and claims that would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition , liquidity or results of operations . however , the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty . should the company fail to prevail in any of these legal matters or should several of these legal matters be resolved against the company in the same reporting period , the operating results of a particular reporting period could be materially adversely affected . the parliament of the european union is working on finalizing the waste electrical and electronic equipment directive ( the directive ) . the directive makes producers of electrical goods , including personal computers , financially responsible for the collection , recycling , and safe disposal of past and future products . the directive must now be approved and implemented by individual european union governments by june 2004 , while the producers' financial obligations are scheduled to start june 2005 . the company's potential liability resulting from the directive related to past sales of its products and expenses associated with future sales of its product may be substantial . however , because it is likely that specific laws , regulations , and enforcement policies will vary significantly between individual european member states , it is not currently possible to estimate the company's existing liability or future expenses resulting from the directive . as the european union and its individual member states clarify specific requirements and policies with respect to the directive , the company will continue to assess its potential financial impact . similar legislation may be enacted in other geographies , including federal and state legislation in the united states , the cumulative impact of which could be significant . fiscal years . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003</td><td>$ 83</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>78</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>42</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>later years</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 464</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the minimum lease payments due in 2004?\nAnswer: 78.0\nQuestion: what about in 2003?\nAnswer: 83.0\nQuestion: what is the difference between 2003 and 2004?\nAnswer: -5.0\nQuestion: what portion of total minimum lease payments is due in 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.1681" } ]
CONVFINQA6615	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases 2014 the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was approximately $ 1.6 million , $ 0.8 million and $ 2.7 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , of approximately $ 5.9 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 7.1 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.3 million , $ 4.4 million and $ 4.4 million , respectively . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2011 , $ 5.2 and $ 3.4 ; 2012 , $ 4.1 and $ 2.6 ; 2013 , $ 3.8 and $ 2.3 ; 2014 , $ 2.9 and $ 1.7 ; 2015 , $ 2.1 and $ 1.3 , and thereafter , $ 2.8 and $ 1.6 , respectively . leveraged lease 2014 during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with the fasb 2019s lease guidance . as of december 31 , 2010 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million and the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 33.4 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 37.6</td><td>$ 44.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>31.7</td><td>31.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-30.1 ( 30.1 )</td><td>-34.5 ( 34.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-34.2 ( 34.2 )</td><td>-37.0 ( 37.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 5.0</td><td>$ 4.3</td></tr></table> 10 . variable interest entities : consolidated operating properties 2014 included within the company 2019s consolidated operating properties at december 31 , 2010 are four consolidated entities that are vies and for which the company is the primary beneficiary . all of these entities have been established to own and operate real estate property . the company 2019s involvement with these entities is through its majority ownership of the properties . these entities were deemed vies primarily based on the fact that the voting rights of the equity investors are not proportional to their obligation to absorb expected losses or receive the expected residual returns of the entity and substantially all of the entity 2019s activities are conducted on behalf of the investor which has disproportionately fewer voting rights . the company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of these vies as a result of its controlling financial interest . during 2010 , the company sold two consolidated vie 2019s which the company was the primary beneficiary. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of expenses incurred due to subleasing in 2010?\nAnswer: -0.1\nQuestion: what was the value of expenses in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.4" } ]
CONVFINQA2198	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nit can issue debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , warrants , share purchase contracts or share purchase units without a predetermined limit . securities can be sold in one or more separate offerings with the size , price and terms to be determined at the time of sale . emerson 2019s financial structure provides the flexibility necessary to achieve its strategic objectives . the company has been successful in efficiently deploying cash where needed worldwide to fund operations , complete acquisitions and sustain long-term growth . at september 30 , 2017 , $ 3.1 billion of the company 2019s cash was held outside the u.s . ( primarily in europe and asia ) , $ 1.4 billion of which income taxes have been provided for , and was generally available for repatriation to the u.s . under current tax law , repatriated cash may be subject to u.s . federal income taxes , net of available foreign tax credits . the company routinely repatriates a portion of its non-u.s . cash from earnings each year , or otherwise when it can be accomplished tax efficiently , and provides for u.s . income taxes as appropriate . the company has been able to readily meet all its funding requirements and currently believes that sufficient funds will be available to meet the company 2019s needs in the foreseeable future through operating cash flow , existing resources , short- and long-term debt capacity or backup credit lines . contractual obligations at september 30 , 2017 , the company 2019s contractual obligations , including estimated payments , are as follows : amounts due by period less more than 1 2013 3 3 2013 5 than ( dollars in millions ) total 1 year years years 5 years long-term debt ( including interest ) $ 5342 428 1434 966 2514 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>amounts due by period total</td><td>amounts due by period less than 1 year</td><td>amounts due by period 1 - 3years</td><td>amounts due by period 3 - 5years</td><td>amounts due by period more than5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( including interest )</td><td>$ 5342</td><td>428</td><td>1434</td><td>966</td><td>2514</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating leases</td><td>536</td><td>171</td><td>206</td><td>80</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>746</td><td>655</td><td>71</td><td>14</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 6624</td><td>1254</td><td>1711</td><td>1060</td><td>2599</td></tr></table> purchase obligations consist primarily of inventory purchases made in the normal course of business to meet operational requirements . the table above does not include $ 2.0 billion of other noncurrent liabilities recorded in the balance sheet and summarized in note 19 , which consist primarily of pension and postretirement plan liabilities , deferred income taxes and unrecognized tax benefits , because it is not certain when these amounts will become due . see notes 11 and 12 for estimated future benefit payments and note 14 for additional information on deferred income taxes . financial instruments the company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices , and selectively uses derivative financial instruments , including forwards , swaps and purchased options to manage these risks . the company does not hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes . the value of derivatives and other financial instruments is subject to change as a result of market movements in rates and prices . sensitivity analysis is one technique used to forecast the impact of these movements . based on a hypothetical 10 percent increase in interest rates , a 10 percent decrease in commodity prices or a 10 percent weakening in the u.s . dollar across all currencies , the potential losses in future earnings , fair value or cash flows are not material . sensitivity analysis has limitations ; for example , a weaker u.s . dollar would benefit future earnings through favorable translation of non-u.s . operating results , and lower commodity prices would benefit future earnings through lower cost of sales . see notes 1 , and 8 through 10 . critical accounting policies preparation of the company 2019s financial statements requires management to make judgments , assumptions and estimates regarding uncertainties that could affect reported revenue , expenses , assets , liabilities and equity . note 1 describes the significant accounting policies used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements . the most significant areas where management judgments and estimates impact the primary financial statements are described below . actual results in these areas could differ materially from management 2019s estimates under different assumptions or conditions . revenue recognition the company recognizes a large majority of its revenue through the sale of manufactured products and records the sale when products are shipped or delivered , title and risk of loss pass to the customer , and collection is reasonably assured . in certain circumstances , revenue is recognized using the percentage-of- completion method , as performance occurs , or in accordance with asc 985-605 related to software . sales arrangements sometimes involve delivering multiple elements , which requires management judgment that affects the amount and timing of revenue recognized . in these instances , the revenue assigned to each element is based on vendor-specific objective evidence , third-party evidence or a management estimate of the relative selling price . revenue is recognized for delivered elements if they have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and performance related to the undelivered items is probable and substantially in the company 2019s control , or the undelivered elements are inconsequential or perfunctory and there are no unsatisfied contingencies related to payment . the vast majority of deliverables are tangible products , with a smaller portion attributable to installation , service or maintenance . management believes that all relevant criteria and conditions are considered when recognizing revenue. .\nQuestion: what is the total obligations for long-term debt?\nAnswer: 5342.0\nQuestion: what about the balance of total obligations as of sep 30, 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6624.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8752	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in \"general and administrative expenses\" . effective january 1 , 2017 , the company adopted asu 2016-09 , improvements to employee share- based payment accounting , which allows employers to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur . the company elected this option using the modified retrospective transition method , with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings , and there was no material effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations taken as a whole resulting from the reversal of previously estimated forfeitures . total compensation expense under the stock plan was approximately $ 10.8 million , $ 12.2 million and $ 6.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was approximately $ 0.2 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was approximately $ 14.1 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.2 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 4.8 million , $ 2.0 million and $ 1.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is listed below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , was $ 84.53 , $ 73.20 and $ 68.35 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free rate</td><td>0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )</td><td>0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )</td><td>0.10% ( 0.10 % ) - 1.05% ( 1.05 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.573% ( 3.573 % )</td><td>3.634% ( 3.634 % )</td><td>3.932% ( 3.932 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )</td><td>18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )</td><td>15.41% ( 15.41 % ) - 16.04% ( 16.04 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>requisite service period</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td></tr></table> the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the date of grant . volatility for maa was obtained by using a blend of both historical and implied volatility calculations . historical volatility was based on the standard deviation of daily total continuous returns , and implied volatility was based on the trailing month average of daily implied volatilities interpolating between the volatilities implied by stock call option contracts that were closest to the terms shown and closest to the money . the minimum volatility was based on a period of 3 years , 2 years and 1 year for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the maximum volatility was based on a period of 1 year , 1 year and 2 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the requisite service period is based on the criteria for the separate programs according to the vesting schedule. .\nQuestion: what was the highest volatility in the year of 2017?\nAnswer: 0.2185\nQuestion: and what was the lowest?\nAnswer: 0.2043\nQuestion: what is, then, the sum of those volatilities?\nAnswer: 0.4228\nQuestion: and what is the average between them?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.2114" } ]
CONVFINQA4654	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s . dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>october 30 2010</td><td>october 31 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value of forward exchange contracts asset</td><td>$ 7256</td><td>$ 8367</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset</td><td>$ 22062</td><td>$ 20132</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability</td><td>$ -7396 ( 7396 )</td><td>$ -6781 ( 6781 )</td></tr></table> fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22062 $ 20132 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 7396 ) $ ( 6781 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s . dollar . in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive . our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .\nQuestion: what was the fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates in 2010?\nAnswer: 22062.0\nQuestion: what was the fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "20132.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7644	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( 2 ) for purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges , earnings consist of earnings before income taxes minus income from equity investees plus fixed charges . fixed charges consist of interest expense and the portion of rental expense we believe is representative of the interest component of rental expense . ( a ) for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , earnings available for fixed charges were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $ 37.0 million and $ 461.2 million , respectively . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income ( loss ) before interest expense , income tax expense ( benefit ) , depreciation , and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , is calculated by adjusting ebitda for certain items of income and expense including ( but not limited to ) the following : ( a ) non-cash equity-based compensation ; ( b ) goodwill impairment charges ; ( c ) sponsor fees ; ( d ) certain consulting fees ; ( e ) debt-related legal and accounting costs ; ( f ) equity investment income and losses ; ( g ) certain severance and retention costs ; ( h ) gains and losses from the early extinguishment of debt ; ( i ) gains and losses from asset dispositions outside the ordinary course of business ; and ( j ) non-recurring , extraordinary or unusual gains or losses or expenses . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by the company may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda also provides helpful information as it is the primary measure used in certain financial covenants contained in our credit agreements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income ( loss ) to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td><td>$ -29.2 ( 29.2 )</td><td>$ -373.4 ( 373.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>208.2</td><td>210.2</td><td>204.9</td><td>209.4</td><td>218.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax expense ( benefit )</td><td>62.7</td><td>67.1</td><td>11.2</td><td>-7.8 ( 7.8 )</td><td>-87.8 ( 87.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>250.1</td><td>307.4</td><td>324.2</td><td>391.9</td><td>431.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ebitda</td><td>653.8</td><td>703.7</td><td>557.4</td><td>564.3</td><td>188.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td><td>11.5</td><td>15.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>sponsor fees</td><td>2.5</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>consulting and debt-related professional fees</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.1</td><td>15.1</td><td>14.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>241.8</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net loss ( gain ) on extinguishments of long-term debt</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>litigation net ( i )</td><td>-4.1 ( 4.1 )</td><td>4.3</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses</td><td>75.0</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other adjustments ( ii )</td><td>8.6</td><td>13.7</td><td>11.4</td><td>7.9</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>adjusted ebitda</td><td>$ 808.5</td><td>$ 766.6</td><td>$ 717.3</td><td>$ 601.8</td><td>$ 465.4</td></tr></table> ( i ) relates to unusual , non-recurring litigation matters . ( ii ) includes certain retention costs and equity investment income , certain severance costs in 2009 and a gain related to the sale of the informacast software and equipment in 2009. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2003, what was the total of the net income and the income tax expense, combined?\nAnswer: 195.5\nQuestion: and how much did the income tax expense represent in relation to this total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.32072" } ]
CONVFINQA7690	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nan adverse development with respect to one claim in 2008 and favorable developments in three cases in 2009 . other costs were also lower in 2009 compared to 2008 , driven by a decrease in expenses for freight and property damages , employee travel , and utilities . in addition , higher bad debt expense in 2008 due to the uncertain impact of the recessionary economy drove a favorable year-over-year comparison . conversely , an additional expense of $ 30 million related to a transaction with pacer international , inc . and higher property taxes partially offset lower costs in 2009 . other costs were higher in 2008 compared to 2007 due to an increase in bad debts , state and local taxes , loss and damage expenses , utility costs , and other miscellaneous expenses totaling $ 122 million . conversely , personal injury costs ( including asbestos-related claims ) were $ 8 million lower in 2008 compared to 2007 . the reduction reflects improvements in our safety experience and lower estimated costs to resolve claims as indicated in the actuarial studies of our personal injury expense and annual reviews of asbestos-related claims in both 2008 and 2007 . the year-over-year comparison also includes the negative impact of adverse development associated with one claim in 2008 . in addition , environmental and toxic tort expenses were $ 7 million lower in 2008 compared to 2007 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2008 v 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 195</td><td>$ 92</td><td>$ 116</td><td>112 % ( % )</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-600 ( 600 )</td><td>-511 ( 511 )</td><td>-482 ( 482 )</td><td>17</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-1089 ( 1089 )</td><td>-1318 ( 1318 )</td><td>-1154 ( 1154 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>14</td></tr></table> other income 2013 other income increased $ 103 million in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily due to higher gains from real estate sales , which included the $ 116 million pre-tax gain from a land sale to the regional transportation district ( rtd ) in colorado and lower interest expense on our sale of receivables program , resulting from lower interest rates and a lower outstanding balance . reduced rental and licensing income and lower returns on cash investments , reflecting lower interest rates , partially offset these increases . other income decreased in 2008 compared to 2007 due to lower gains from real estate sales and decreased returns on cash investments reflecting lower interest rates . higher rental and licensing income and lower interest expense on our sale of receivables program partially offset the decreases . interest expense 2013 interest expense increased in 2009 versus 2008 due primarily to higher weighted- average debt levels . in 2009 , the weighted-average debt level was $ 9.6 billion ( including the restructuring of locomotive leases in may of 2009 ) , compared to $ 8.3 billion in 2008 . our effective interest rate was 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) in 2009 , compared to 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) in 2008 . interest expense increased in 2008 versus 2007 due to a higher weighted-average debt level of $ 8.3 billion , compared to $ 7.3 billion in 2007 . a lower effective interest rate of 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) in 2008 , compared to 6.6% ( 6.6 % ) in 2007 , partially offset the effects of the higher weighted-average debt level . income taxes 2013 income taxes were lower in 2009 compared to 2008 , driven by lower pre-tax income . our effective tax rate for the year was 36.5% ( 36.5 % ) compared to 36.1% ( 36.1 % ) in 2008 . income taxes were higher in 2008 compared to 2007 , driven by higher pre-tax income . our effective tax rates were 36.1% ( 36.1 % ) and 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the lower effective tax rate in 2008 resulted from several reductions in tax expense related to federal audits and state tax law changes . in addition , the effective tax rate in 2007 was increased by illinois legislation that increased deferred tax expense in the third quarter of 2007. .\nQuestion: what is the weighted-average debt level in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9.6" } ]
CONVFINQA11067	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nprior to its adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the company recorded compensation expense for restricted stock awards on a straight-line basis over their vesting period . if an employee forfeited the award prior to vesting , the company reversed out the previously expensed amounts in the period of forfeiture . as required upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the company must base its accruals of compensation expense on the estimated number of awards for which the requisite service period is expected to be rendered . actual forfeitures are no longer recorded in the period of forfeiture . in 2005 , the company recorded a pre-tax credit of $ 2.8 million in cumulative effect of accounting change , that represents the amount by which compensation expense would have been reduced in periods prior to adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) for restricted stock awards outstanding on july 1 , 2005 that are anticipated to be forfeited . a summary of non-vested restricted stock award and restricted stock unit activity is presented below : shares ( in thousands ) weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2006:</td><td>2878</td><td>$ 13.01</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issued</td><td>830</td><td>$ 22.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>released ( vested )</td><td>-514 ( 514 )</td><td>$ 15.93</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canceled</td><td>-1197 ( 1197 )</td><td>$ 13.75</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2007:</td><td>1997</td><td>$ 15.91</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2007 , there was $ 15.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards . this cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years . the total fair value of restricted shares and restricted stock units vested was $ 11.0 million , $ 7.5 million and $ 4.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the shareholders of the company previously approved the 2002 employee stock purchase plan ( 201c2002 purchase plan 201d ) , and reserved 5000000 shares of common stock for sale to employees at a price no less than 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning of the one-year offering period or the end of each of the six-month purchase periods . under sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the 2002 purchase plan was considered compensatory . effective august 1 , 2005 , the company changed the terms of its purchase plan to reduce the discount to 5% ( 5 % ) and discontinued the look-back provision . as a result , the purchase plan was not compensatory beginning august 1 , 2005 . for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company recorded $ 0.4 million in compensation expense for its employee stock purchase plan for the period in which the 2002 plan was considered compensatory until the terms were changed august 1 , 2005 . at december 31 , 2007 , 757123 shares were available for purchase under the 2002 purchase plan . 401 ( k ) plan the company has a 401 ( k ) salary deferral program for eligible employees who have met certain service requirements . the company matches certain employee contributions ; additional contributions to this plan are at the discretion of the company . total contribution expense under this plan was $ 5.7 million , $ 5.7 million and $ 5.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the total contribution expense in 2006?\nAnswer: 5.7\nQuestion: and in 2005?\nAnswer: 5.2\nQuestion: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?\nAnswer: 0.5\nQuestion: and the value for 2005 again?\nAnswer: 5.2\nQuestion: so what was the difference as a percentage of the original value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.09615" } ]
CONVFINQA3778	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid are presented below . domestic pension plan foreign pension plans domestic postretirement benefit plan . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domesticpension plan</td><td>foreignpension plans</td><td>domestic postretirementbenefit plan</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 14.5</td><td>$ 21.7</td><td>$ 3.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8.8</td><td>18.7</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>8.0</td><td>19.8</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>8.3</td><td>20.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>7.8</td><td>21.8</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2024 - 2028</td><td>36.7</td><td>117.2</td><td>9.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our domestic postretirement benefit plan are net of any estimated u.s . federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 , which total no more than $ 0.3 in any individual year . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allow participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 52.6 , $ 47.2 and $ 47.0 , respectively . expenses include a discretionary company contribution of $ 6.7 , $ 3.6 and $ 6.1 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 5.8 , $ 4.6 and $ 4.4 in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 51.3 , $ 47.4 and $ 44.5 to these plans in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation and benefit arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . these arrangements may provide participants with the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service , attaining a certain age or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance was $ 196.2 and $ 213.2 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation and benefit arrangements in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 10.0 , $ 18.5 and $ 18.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 177.3 and $ 177.4 , respectively . long-term disability plan we have a long-term disability plan which provides income replacement benefits to eligible participants who are unable to perform their job duties or any job related to his or her education , training or experience . as all income replacement benefits are fully insured , no related obligation is required as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . in addition to income replacement benefits , plan participants may remain covered for certain health and life insurance benefits up to normal retirement age , and accordingly , we have recorded an obligation of $ 5.9 and $ 8.4 as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .\nQuestion: in 2019, what was the total of the foreign pension plan?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "21.7" } ]
CONVFINQA9883	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements operating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 minimum rental ( a ) $ 245 $ 209 $ 172 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>minimum rental ( a )</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 209</td><td>$ 172</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contingent rental</td><td>22</td><td>33</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sublease rentals</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net rental expense</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 242</td><td>$ 193</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 5 million , $ 8 million and $ 9 million paid by united states steel in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 on assumed leases . 27 . contingencies and commitments we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment . certain of these matters are discussed below . the ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements . however , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably . environmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment . these laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites . penalties may be imposed for noncompliance . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 111 million and $ 108 million . it is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed . receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 60 and $ 66 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 20 cases arising in three states alleging damages for methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) contamination . we have also received seven toxic substances control act notice letters involving potential claims in two states . such notice letters are often followed by litigation . like the cases that were settled in 2008 , the remaining mtbe cases are consolidated in a multidistrict litigation in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings . nineteen of the remaining cases allege damages to water supply wells , similar to the damages claimed in the settled cases . in the other remaining case , the state of new jersey is seeking natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe . this is the only mtbe contamination case in which we are a defendant and natural resources damages are sought . we are vigorously defending these cases . we , along with a number of other defendants , have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of the cases in which we are a defendant . we do not expect our share of liability , if any , for the remaining cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . a lawsuit filed in the united states district court for the southern district of west virginia alleges that our catlettsburg , kentucky , refinery distributed contaminated gasoline to wholesalers and retailers for a period prior to august , 2003 , causing permanent damage to storage tanks , dispensers and related equipment , resulting in lost profits , business disruption and personal and real property damages . following the incident , we conducted remediation operations at affected facilities , and we deny that any permanent damages resulted from the incident . class action certification was granted in august 2007 . we have entered into a tentative settlement agreement in this case . notice of the proposed settlement has been sent to the class members . approval by the court after a fairness hearing is required before the settlement can be finalized . the fairness hearing is scheduled in the first quarter of 2009 . the proposed settlement will not significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . guarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies . under the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements . in addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the minimum rental from 2006 to 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "73.0" } ]
CONVFINQA843	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 105</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 198</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>126</td><td>146</td><td>149</td><td>172</td><td>228</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>132</td><td>109</td><td>141</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>98</td><td>121</td><td>93</td><td>122</td><td>168</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the state street corporation value in 2013?\nAnswer: 198.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2008?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in value of the state street corporation over the years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "98.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7183	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nadobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 15 . commitments and contingencies lease commitments we lease certain of our facilities and some of our equipment under non-cancellable operating lease arrangements that expire at various dates through 2028 . we also have one land lease that expires in 2091 . rent expense includes base contractual rent and variable costs such as building expenses , utilities , taxes , insurance and equipment rental . rent expense and sublease income for these leases for fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rent expense</td><td>$ 111149</td><td>$ 118976</td><td>$ 105809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : sublease income</td><td>1412</td><td>3057</td><td>2330</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net rent expense</td><td>$ 109737</td><td>$ 115919</td><td>$ 103479</td></tr></table> we occupy three office buildings in san jose , california where our corporate headquarters are located . we reference these office buildings as the almaden tower and the east and west towers . in august 2014 , we exercised our option to purchase the east and west towers for a total purchase price of $ 143.2 million . upon purchase , our investment in the lease receivable of $ 126.8 million was credited against the total purchase price and we were no longer required to maintain a standby letter of credit as stipulated in the east and west towers lease agreement . we capitalized the east and west towers as property and equipment on our consolidated balance sheets at $ 144.1 million , the lesser of cost or fair value , which represented the total purchase price plus other direct costs associated with the purchase . see note 6 for discussion of our east and west towers purchase . the lease agreement for the almaden tower is effective through march 2017 . we are the investors in the lease receivable related to the almaden tower lease in the amount of $ 80.4 million , which is recorded as investment in lease receivable on our consolidated balance sheets . as of november 28 , 2014 , the carrying value of the lease receivable related to the almaden tower approximated fair value . under the agreement for the almaden tower , we have the option to purchase the building at any time during the lease term for $ 103.6 million . if we purchase the building , the investment in the lease receivable may be credited against the purchase price . the residual value guarantee under the almaden tower obligation is $ 89.4 million . the almaden tower lease is subject to standard covenants including certain financial ratios that are reported to the lessor quarterly . as of november 28 , 2014 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . in the case of a default , the lessor may demand we purchase the building for an amount equal to the lease balance , or require that we remarket or relinquish the building . if we choose to remarket or are required to do so upon relinquishing the building , we are bound to arrange the sale of the building to an unrelated party and will be required to pay the lessor any shortfall between the net remarketing proceeds and the lease balance , up to the residual value guarantee amount less our investment in lease receivable . the almaden tower lease qualifies for operating lease accounting treatment and , as such , the building and the related obligation are not included in our consolidated balance sheets . see note 16 for discussion of our capital lease obligation . unconditional purchase obligations our purchase obligations consist of agreements to purchase goods and services entered into in the ordinary course of business. .\nQuestion: what was the net rent expense in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "109737.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4938	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report 89 the table below reflects the firm 2019s assessed level of capital allocated to each line of business as of the dates indicated . line of business equity ( allocated capital ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions )</td><td>january 12018</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consumer & community banking</td><td>$ 51.0</td><td>$ 51.0</td><td>$ 51.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>corporate & investment bank</td><td>70.0</td><td>70.0</td><td>64.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commercial banking</td><td>20.0</td><td>20.0</td><td>16.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset & wealth management</td><td>9.0</td><td>9.0</td><td>9.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>corporate</td><td>79.6</td><td>79.6</td><td>88.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total common stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>$ 229.6</td><td>$ 229.6</td><td>$ 228.1</td></tr></table> planning and stress testing comprehensive capital analysis and review the federal reserve requires large bank holding companies , including the firm , to submit a capital plan on an annual basis . the federal reserve uses the ccar and dodd-frank act stress test processes to ensure that large bhcs have sufficient capital during periods of economic and financial stress , and have robust , forward-looking capital assessment and planning processes in place that address each bhc 2019s unique risks to enable it to absorb losses under certain stress scenarios . through the ccar , the federal reserve evaluates each bhc 2019s capital adequacy and internal capital adequacy assessment processes ( 201cicaap 201d ) , as well as its plans to make capital distributions , such as dividend payments or stock repurchases . on june 28 , 2017 , the federal reserve informed the firm that it did not object , on either a quantitative or qualitative basis , to the firm 2019s 2017 capital plan . for information on actions taken by the firm 2019s board of directors following the 2017 ccar results , see capital actions on pages 89-90 . the firm 2019s ccar process is integrated into and employs the same methodologies utilized in the firm 2019s icaap process , as discussed below . internal capital adequacy assessment process semiannually , the firm completes the icaap , which provides management with a view of the impact of severe and unexpected events on earnings , balance sheet positions , reserves and capital . the firm 2019s icaap integrates stress testing protocols with capital planning . the process assesses the potential impact of alternative economic and business scenarios on the firm 2019s earnings and capital . economic scenarios , and the parameters underlying those scenarios , are defined centrally and applied uniformly across the businesses . these scenarios are articulated in terms of macroeconomic factors , which are key drivers of business results ; global market shocks , which generate short-term but severe trading losses ; and idiosyncratic operational risk events . the scenarios are intended to capture and stress key vulnerabilities and idiosyncratic risks facing the firm . however , when defining a broad range of scenarios , actual events can always be worse . accordingly , management considers additional stresses outside these scenarios , as necessary . icaap results are reviewed by management and the audit committee . capital actions preferred stock preferred stock dividends declared were $ 1.7 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2017 . on october 20 , 2017 , the firm issued $ 1.3 billion of fixed- to-floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock , series cc , with an initial dividend rate of 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) . on december 1 , 2017 , the firm redeemed all $ 1.3 billion of its outstanding 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) non-cumulative preferred stock , series o . for additional information on the firm 2019s preferred stock , see note 20 . trust preferred securities on december 18 , 2017 , the delaware trusts that issued seven series of outstanding trust preferred securities were liquidated , $ 1.6 billion of trust preferred and $ 56 million of common securities originally issued by those trusts were cancelled , and the junior subordinated debentures previously held by each trust issuer were distributed pro rata to the holders of the corresponding series of trust preferred and common securities . the firm redeemed $ 1.6 billion of trust preferred securities in the year ended december 31 , 2016 . common stock dividends the firm 2019s common stock dividend policy reflects jpmorgan chase 2019s earnings outlook , desired dividend payout ratio , capital objectives , and alternative investment opportunities . on september 19 , 2017 , the firm announced that its board of directors increased the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.56 per share , effective with the dividend paid on october 31 , 2017 . the firm 2019s dividends are subject to the board of directors 2019 approval on a quarterly basis . for information regarding dividend restrictions , see note 20 and note 25. .\nQuestion: what was the amount of fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock, series cc issued by the company, in billions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.3" } ]
CONVFINQA4669	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>4/09</td><td>4/10</td><td>4/11</td><td>4/12</td><td>4/13</td><td>4/14</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>netapp inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 189.45</td><td>$ 284.75</td><td>$ 212.19</td><td>$ 190.66</td><td>$ 197.58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>144.63</td><td>170.44</td><td>182.57</td><td>202.25</td><td>253.22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.84</td><td>162.75</td><td>170.49</td><td>199.29</td><td>240.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>143.49</td><td>162.37</td><td>186.06</td><td>189.18</td><td>236.12</td></tr></table> we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .\nQuestion: what was the performance value of the netapp inc . in 2014?\nAnswer: 197.58\nQuestion: and what was the change in its performance from 2009 to that year?\nAnswer: 97.58\nQuestion: how much, then, does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2009, in percentage?\nAnswer: 0.9758\nQuestion: and what was the change in the performance of the nasdaq composite from 2009 to 2014?\nAnswer: 153.22\nQuestion: how much does this change represent in relation to the performance of that stock in 2009, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.5322" } ]
CONVFINQA6824	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhost hotels & resorts , inc. , host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies description of business host hotels & resorts , inc . operates as a self-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust , or reit , with its operations conducted solely through host hotels & resorts , l.p . host hotels & resorts , l.p. , a delaware limited partnership , operates through an umbrella partnership structure , with host hotels & resorts , inc. , a maryland corporation , as its sole general partner . in the notes to the consolidated financial statements , we use the terms 201cwe 201d or 201cour 201d to refer to host hotels & resorts , inc . and host hotels & resorts , l.p . together , unless the context indicates otherwise . we also use the term 201chost inc . 201d to refer specifically to host hotels & resorts , inc . and the term 201chost l.p . 201d to refer specifically to host hotels & resorts , l.p . in cases where it is important to distinguish between host inc . and host l.p . host inc . holds approximately 99% ( 99 % ) of host l.p . 2019s partnership interests , or op units . consolidated portfolio as of december 31 , 2018 , the hotels in our consolidated portfolio are in the following countries: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>hotels</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>88</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>brazil</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>canada</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>93</td></tr></table> basis of presentation and principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of host inc. , host l.p . and their subsidiaries and controlled affiliates , including joint ventures and partnerships . we consolidate subsidiaries when we have the ability to control them . for the majority of our hotel and real estate investments , we consider those control rights to be ( i ) approval or amendment of developments plans , ( ii ) financing decisions , ( iii ) approval or amendments of operating budgets , and ( iv ) investment strategy decisions . we also evaluate our subsidiaries to determine if they are variable interest entities ( 201cvies 201d ) . if a subsidiary is a vie , it is subject to the consolidation framework specifically for vies . typically , the entity that has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact economic performance consolidates the vie . we consider an entity to be a vie if equity investors own an interest therein that does not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or if such investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support . we review our subsidiaries and affiliates at least annually to determine if ( i ) they should be considered vies , and ( ii ) whether we should change our consolidation determination based on changes in the characteristics thereof . three partnerships are considered vie 2019s , as the general partner maintains control over the decisions that most significantly impact the partnerships . the first vie is the operating partnership , host l.p. , which is consolidated by host inc. , of which host inc . is the general partner and holds 99% ( 99 % ) of the limited partner interests . host inc . 2019s sole significant asset is its investment in host l.p . and substantially all of host inc . 2019s assets and liabilities represent assets and liabilities of host l.p . all of host inc . 2019s debt is an obligation of host l.p . and may be settled only with assets of host l.p . the consolidated partnership that owns the houston airport marriott at george bush intercontinental , of which we are the general partner and hold 85% ( 85 % ) of the partnership interests , also is a vie . the total assets of this vie at december 31 , 2018 are $ 48 million and consist primarily of cash and .\nQuestion: what is the total of hotel properties in brazil?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6755	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .\nQuestion: what was the cash used in investing activities in 2005?\nAnswer: 2047.0\nQuestion: and what was the one used in financing activities?\nAnswer: 752.0\nQuestion: how much, then, did the investing cash represent in relation to this financing one?\nAnswer: 2.72207\nQuestion: in that same year, what was the total debt?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "745.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3389	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .\nQuestion: what were the number of berths in 2011?\nAnswer: 155000.0\nQuestion: what were the number of berths in 2007?\nAnswer: 100000.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in berths?\nAnswer: 55000.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\nAnswer: 0.55\nQuestion: what is that as a percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "55.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7274	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnew accounting pronouncements information regarding new accounting pronouncements is included in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements . financial condition and liquidity the company generates significant ongoing cash flow . increases in long-term debt have been used , in part , to fund share repurchase activities and acquisitions . on november 15 , 2007 , 3m ( safety , security and protection services business ) announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement for 3m 2019s acquisition of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of aearo holding corp . e83a a global leader in the personal protection industry that manufactures and markets personal protection and energy absorbing products e83a for approximately $ 1.2 billion . the sale is expected to close towards the end of the first quarter of 2008 . at december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 4920</td><td>$ 3553</td><td>$ 2381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>2955</td><td>2084</td><td>1072</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net debt</td><td>$ 1965</td><td>$ 1469</td><td>$ 1309</td></tr></table> cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaled approximately $ 3 billion , helped by strong cash flow generation and by the timing of debt issuances . at december 31 , 2006 , cash balances were higher due to the significant pharmaceuticals sales proceeds received in december 2006 . 3m believes its ongoing cash flows provide ample cash to fund expected investments and capital expenditures . the company has sufficient access to capital markets to meet currently anticipated growth and acquisition investment funding needs . the company does not utilize derivative instruments linked to the company 2019s stock . however , the company does have contingently convertible debt that , if conditions for conversion are met , is convertible into shares of 3m common stock ( refer to note 10 in this document ) . the company 2019s financial condition and liquidity are strong . various assets and liabilities , including cash and short-term debt , can fluctuate significantly from month to month depending on short-term liquidity needs . working capital ( defined as current assets minus current liabilities ) totaled $ 4.476 billion at december 31 , 2007 , compared with $ 1.623 billion at december 31 , 2006 . working capital was higher primarily due to increases in cash and cash equivalents , short-term marketable securities , receivables and inventories and decreases in short-term debt and accrued income taxes . the company 2019s liquidity remains strong , with cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaling approximately $ 3 billion . primary short-term liquidity needs are provided through u.s . commercial paper and euro commercial paper issuances . as of december 31 , 2007 , outstanding total commercial paper issued totaled $ 349 million and averaged $ 1.249 billion during 2007 . the company believes it unlikely that its access to the commercial paper market will be restricted . in june 2007 , the company established a medium-term notes program through which up to $ 3 billion of medium-term notes may be offered , with remaining shelf borrowing capacity of $ 2.5 billion as of december 31 , 2007 . on april 30 , 2007 , the company replaced its $ 565-million credit facility with a new $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility , which has provisions for the company to request an increase of the facility up to $ 2 billion ( at the lenders 2019 discretion ) , and providing for up to $ 150 million in letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are $ 110 million in letters of credit drawn against the facility . at december 31 , 2007 , available short-term committed lines of credit internationally totaled approximately $ 67 million , of which $ 13 million was utilized . debt covenants do not restrict the payment of dividends . the company has a \"well-known seasoned issuer\" shelf registration statement , effective february 24 , 2006 , to register an indeterminate amount of debt or equity securities for future sales . the company intends to use the proceeds from future securities sales off this shelf for general corporate purposes . at december 31 , 2007 , certain debt agreements ( $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities and $ 87 million of esop debt ) had ratings triggers ( bbb-/baa3 or lower ) that would require repayment of debt . the company has an aa credit rating , with a stable outlook , from standard & poor 2019s and an aa1 credit rating , with a negative outlook , from moody 2019s investors service . in addition , under the $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility agreement , 3m is required to maintain its ebitda to interest ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter at not less than 3.0 to 1 . this is calculated ( as defined in the agreement ) as the ratio of consolidated total ebitda for the four consecutive quarters then ended to total interest expense on all funded debt for the same period . at december 31 , 2007 , this ratio was approximately 35 to 1. .\nQuestion: in 2007, how much did the total debt represent in relation to the total of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities?\nAnswer: 1.66497\nQuestion: and between that year and the previous, what was the variation in the working capital?\nAnswer: 2.853\nQuestion: what was that working capital in 2006?\nAnswer: 1.623\nQuestion: what percentage, then, does that variation represent in relation to this 2006 amount?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.75786" } ]
CONVFINQA8626	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstate street bank issuances : state street bank currently has authority to issue up to an aggregate of $ 1 billion of subordinated fixed-rate , floating-rate or zero-coupon bank notes with a maturity of five to fifteen years . with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify as tier 2 capital under regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year beginning in july 2006 , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year beginning in march 2006 . the notes qualify as tier 2 capital under regulatory capital guidelines . note 10 . commitments and contingencies off-balance sheet commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets and standby letters of credit . the total potential loss on unfunded commitments , standby and commercial letters of credit and securities finance indemnifications is equal to the total contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following is a summary of the contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to unrelated third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 506032</td><td>$ 372863</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liquidity asset purchase agreements</td><td>30251</td><td>24412</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unfunded commitments to extend credit</td><td>16354</td><td>14403</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4926</td><td>5027</td></tr></table> on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . in certain circumstances , we may indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities totaling $ 527.37 billion and $ 387.22 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit and liquidity asset purchase agreements expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of the commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . in the normal course of business , we provide liquidity and credit enhancements to asset-backed commercial paper programs , or 201cconduits . 201d these conduits are more fully described in note 11 . the commercial paper issuances and commitments of the conduits to provide funding are supported by liquidity asset purchase agreements and backup liquidity lines of credit , the majority of which are provided by us . in addition , we provide direct credit support to the conduits in the form of standby letters of credit . our commitments under liquidity asset purchase agreements and backup lines of credit totaled $ 23.99 billion at december 31 , 2006 , and are included in the preceding table . our commitments under seq 83 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\\\fc\\\\delivery_1024177\\\\2771-1-dm_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:10:46 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .\nQuestion: what is the total of indemnified securities financing and liquidity asset purchase agreements in 2006?\nAnswer: 536283.0\nQuestion: what about adding unfunded commitments to extend credit ?\nAnswer: 552637.0\nQuestion: what about if the balance of standby letters of credit is added?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "557563.0" } ]
CONVFINQA547	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 192.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>42.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>25.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-41.2 ( 41.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr></table> the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the number of electric customers in 2007?\nAnswer: 132000.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2006?\nAnswer: 95000.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 37000.0\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2006 number, in percentage?\nAnswer: 0.38947\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the net change in the revenue?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "38.8" } ]
CONVFINQA4521	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrepublic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in december 2008 , the board of directors amended and restated the republic services , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ( formerly known as the allied waste industries , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ( the 2006 plan ) ) . allied 2019s stockholders approved the 2006 plan in may 2006 . the 2006 plan was amended and restated in december 2008 to reflect that republic services , inc . is the new sponsor of the plan , that any references to shares of common stock is to shares of common stock of republic services , inc. , and to adjust outstanding awards and the number of shares available under the plan to reflect the acquisition . the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provides for the grant of non-qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards . awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2012 , there were approximately 15.5 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for each of the period presented ) and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 4.77 , $ 5.35 and $ 5.28 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>27.8% ( 27.8 % )</td><td>27.3% ( 27.3 % )</td><td>28.6% ( 28.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>2.7% ( 2.7 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.5</td><td>4.4</td><td>4.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7.0</td><td>7.0</td><td>7.0</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the dividend yield in 2012?\nAnswer: 3.2\nQuestion: what about in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.7" } ]
CONVFINQA9834	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nuncertain tax positions the following is a reconciliation of the company's beginning and ending amount of uncertain tax positions ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 191</td><td>$ 164</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>31</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>53</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>business combinations</td><td>2014</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 218</td><td>$ 191</td></tr></table> the company's liability for uncertain tax positions as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , includes $ 180 million , $ 154 million , and $ 141 million , respectively , related to amounts that would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . it is possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect the change to have a significant impact on our consolidated statements of income or consolidated balance sheets . these changes may be the result of settlements of ongoing audits . at this time , an estimate of the range of the reasonably possible outcomes within the twelve months cannot be made . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in its provision for income taxes . the company accrued potential interest and penalties of $ 2 million , $ 4 million , and $ 2 million in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recorded a liability for interest and penalties of $ 33 million , $ 31 million , and $ 27 million as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in their respective jurisdictions . the company has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2007 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2005 . the company has concluded income tax examinations in its primary non-u.s . jurisdictions through 2005 . 9 . shareholders' equity distributable reserves as a u.k . incorporated company , the company is required under u.k . law to have available \"distributable reserves\" to make share repurchases or pay dividends to shareholders . distributable reserves may be created through the earnings of the u.k . parent company and , amongst other methods , through a reduction in share capital approved by the english companies court . distributable reserves are not linked to a u.s . gaap reported amount ( e.g. , retained earnings ) . as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , the company had distributable reserves in excess of $ 2.1 billion and $ 4.0 billion , respectively . ordinary shares in april 2012 , the company's board of directors authorized a share repurchase program under which up to $ 5.0 billion of class a ordinary shares may be repurchased ( \"2012 share repurchase program\" ) . in november 2014 , the company's board of directors authorized a new $ 5.0 billion share repurchase program in addition to the existing program ( \"2014 share repurchase program\" and , together , the \"repurchase programs\" ) . under each program , shares may be repurchased through the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , based on prevailing market conditions , funded from available capital . during 2015 , the company repurchased 16.0 million shares at an average price per share of $ 97.04 for a total cost of $ 1.6 billion under the repurchase programs . during 2014 , the company repurchased 25.8 million shares at an average price per share of $ 87.18 for a total cost of $ 2.3 billion under the 2012 share repurchase plan . in august 2015 , the $ 5 billion of class a ordinary shares authorized under the 2012 share repurchase program was exhausted . at december 31 , 2015 , the remaining authorized amount for share repurchase under the 2014 share repurchase program is $ 4.1 billion . under the repurchase programs , the company repurchased a total of 78.1 million shares for an aggregate cost of $ 5.9 billion. .\nQuestion: what was the balance of uncertain tax positions in the end of 2015?\nAnswer: 218.0\nQuestion: and what was it in the beginning of the year?\nAnswer: 191.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change throughout the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "27.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5506	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in cash from operations from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: 227.0\nQuestion: what is the cash from operations in 2008?\nAnswer: 641.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.35413\nQuestion: what about the cash from operations in 2010?\nAnswer: 1151.0\nQuestion: and in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "868.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1504	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nzimmer biomet holdings , inc . and subsidiaries 2017 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) substantially complete . the following table summarizes the liabilities related to these integration plans ( in millions ) : employee termination benefits contract terminations total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>employee termination benefits</td><td>contract terminations</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2016</td><td>$ 38.1</td><td>$ 35.1</td><td>$ 73.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions</td><td>12.1</td><td>5.2</td><td>17.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash payments</td><td>-36.7 ( 36.7 )</td><td>-10.4 ( 10.4 )</td><td>-47.1 ( 47.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency exchange rate changes</td><td>1.3</td><td>0.4</td><td>1.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2017</td><td>$ 14.8</td><td>$ 30.3</td><td>$ 45.1</td></tr></table> we have also recognized other employee termination benefits related to ldr , other acquisitions and our operational excellence initiatives . dedicated project personnel expenses include the salary , benefits , travel expenses and other costs directly associated with employees who are 100 percent dedicated to our integration of acquired businesses , employees who have been notified of termination , but are continuing to work on transferring their responsibilities and employees working on our quality enhancement and remediation efforts and operational excellence initiatives . relocated facilities expenses are the moving costs , lease expenses and other facility costs incurred during the relocation period in connection with relocating certain facilities . certain litigation matters relate to net expenses recognized during the year for the estimated or actual settlement of certain pending litigation and similar claims , including matters where we recognized income from a settlement on more favorable terms than our previous estimate , or we reduced our estimate of a previously recorded contingent liability . these litigation matters have included royalty disputes , patent litigation matters , product liability litigation matters and commercial litigation matters . contract termination costs relate to terminated agreements in connection with the integration of acquired companies and changes to our distribution model as part of business restructuring and operational excellence initiatives . the terminated contracts primarily relate to sales agents and distribution agreements . information technology integration costs are non- capitalizable costs incurred related to integrating information technology platforms of acquired companies or other significant software implementations as part of our quality and operational excellence initiatives . as part of the biomet merger , we recognized $ 209.0 million of intangible assets for in-process research and development ( 201cipr&d 201d ) projects . during 2017 and 2016 , we recorded impairment losses of $ 18.8 million and $ 30.0 million , respectively , related to these ipr&d intangible assets . the impairments were primarily due to the termination of certain ipr&d projects . we also recognized $ 479.0 million of intangible assets for trademarks that we designated as having an indefinite life . during 2017 , we reclassified one of these trademarks to a finite life asset which resulted in an impairment of $ 8.0 million . loss/impairment on disposal of assets relates to assets that we have sold or intend to sell , or for which the economic useful life of the asset has been significantly reduced due to integration or our quality and operational excellence initiatives . contingent consideration adjustments represent the changes in the fair value of contingent consideration obligations to be paid to the prior owners of acquired businesses . certain r&d agreements relate to agreements with upfront payments to obtain intellectual property to be used in r&d projects that have no alternative future use in other projects . cash and cash equivalents 2013 we consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable consists of trade and other miscellaneous receivables . we grant credit to customers in the normal course of business and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for potential credit losses . we determine the allowance for doubtful accounts by geographic market and take into consideration historical credit experience , creditworthiness of the customer and other pertinent information . we make concerted efforts to collect all accounts receivable , but sometimes we have to write-off the account against the allowance when we determine the account is uncollectible . the allowance for doubtful accounts was $ 60.2 million and $ 51.6 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . inventories 2013 inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , with cost determined on a first-in first-out basis . property , plant and equipment 2013 property , plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of ten to forty years for buildings and improvements and three to eight years for machinery and equipment . maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred . we review property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair value . software costs 2013 we capitalize certain computer software and software development costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining computer software for internal use when both the preliminary project stage is completed and it is probable that the software will be used as intended . capitalized software costs generally include external direct costs of materials and services utilized in developing or obtaining computer software and compensation and related .\nQuestion: what was the allowance for doubtful accounts as of 12/31/17?\nAnswer: 60.2\nQuestion: and in 2016?\nAnswer: 51.6\nQuestion: so what was the difference between these two values?\nAnswer: 8.6\nQuestion: and the percentage change during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.16667" } ]
CONVFINQA3555	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the difference in price for apple between 2008 and 2013?\nAnswer: 331.0\nQuestion: and the percentage growth?\nAnswer: 3.31\nQuestion: and the difference for the s&p computer hardware index over the same period?\nAnswer: 97.0\nQuestion: and the starting price for the index?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage growth?\nAnswer: 0.97\nQuestion: and the difference between these two growth rates?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.34" } ]
CONVFINQA10771	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements long-term debt instruments the aggregate contractual principal amount of long-term other secured financings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 361 million and $ 362 million as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the aggregate contractual principal amount of unsecured long-term borrowings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 1.56 billion and $ 1.12 billion as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the amounts above include both principal- and non-principal-protected long-term borrowings . impact of credit spreads on loans and lending commitments the estimated net gain attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads on loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option was elected was $ 281 million for 2016 , $ 751 million for 2015 and $ 1.83 billion for 2014 , respectively . the firm generally calculates the fair value of loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the instrument-specific credit spreads . for floating-rate loans and lending commitments , substantially all changes in fair value are attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads , whereas for fixed-rate loans and lending commitments , changes in fair value are also attributable to changes in interest rates . debt valuation adjustment the firm calculates the fair value of financial liabilities for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the firm 2019s credit spreads . the net dva on such financial liabilities was a loss of $ 844 million ( $ 544 million , net of tax ) for 2016 and was included in 201cdebt valuation adjustment 201d in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . the gains/ ( losses ) reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive loss upon extinguishment of such financial liabilities were not material for 2016 . note 9 . loans receivable loans receivable is comprised of loans held for investment that are accounted for at amortized cost net of allowance for loan losses . interest on loans receivable is recognized over the life of the loan and is recorded on an accrual basis . the table below presents details about loans receivable. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2016</td><td>as of december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>corporate loans</td><td>$ 24837</td><td>$ 20740</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans to private wealth management clients</td><td>13828</td><td>13961</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans backed by commercial real estate</td><td>4761</td><td>5271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans backed by residential real estate</td><td>3865</td><td>2316</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other loans</td><td>2890</td><td>3533</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total loans receivable gross</td><td>50181</td><td>45821</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>allowance for loan losses</td><td>-509 ( 509 )</td><td>-414 ( 414 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total loans receivable</td><td>$ 49672</td><td>$ 45407</td></tr></table> as of december 2016 and december 2015 , the fair value of loans receivable was $ 49.80 billion and $ 45.19 billion , respectively . as of december 2016 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 28.40 billion and $ 21.40 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 23.91 billion and $ 21.28 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . the firm also extends lending commitments that are held for investment and accounted for on an accrual basis . as of december 2016 and december 2015 , such lending commitments were $ 98.05 billion and $ 93.92 billion , respectively . substantially all of these commitments were extended to corporate borrowers and were primarily related to the firm 2019s relationship lending activities . the carrying value and the estimated fair value of such lending commitments were liabilities of $ 327 million and $ 2.55 billion , respectively , as of december 2016 , and $ 291 million and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , as of december 2015 . as of december 2016 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.10 billion and $ 1.45 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.35 billion and $ 1.97 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 147 .\nQuestion: as of 2016, what was the amount from the total loans receivable gross that was backed by commercial real estate?\nAnswer: 4761.0\nQuestion: and what was this total of loans receivable gross?\nAnswer: 50181.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.09488" } ]
CONVFINQA10426	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .\nQuestion: what was the hqla in excess of net outflows at the end of 2017?\nAnswer: 82.1\nQuestion: what was the balance at the end of 2016?\nAnswer: 71.3\nQuestion: what is the net difference?\nAnswer: 10.8\nQuestion: what was the starting value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "71.3" } ]
CONVFINQA9454	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/25/2009</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>97.43</td><td>101.85</td><td>88.54</td><td>151.43</td><td>183.29</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>116.52</td><td>125.94</td><td>145.09</td><td>184.52</td><td>216.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>121.00</td><td>132.42</td><td>124.95</td><td>163.20</td><td>207.93</td></tr></table> dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .\nQuestion: what is the value of an investment in applied materials\t in 2012?\nAnswer: 88.54\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-11.46" } ]
CONVFINQA1995	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) fiscal 2007 acquisition : acquisition of biolucent , inc . on september 18 , 2007 the company completed the acquisition of biolucent , inc . ( 201cbiolucent 201d ) pursuant to a definitive agreement dated june 20 , 2007 . the results of operations for biolucent have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment . the company has concluded that the acquisition of biolucent does not represent a material business combination and therefore no pro forma financial information has been provided herein . biolucent , previously located in aliso viejo , california , develops , markets and sells mammopad breast cushions to decrease the discomfort associated with mammography . prior to the acquisition , biolucent 2019s primary research and development efforts were directed at its brachytherapy business which was focused on breast cancer therapy . prior to the acquisition , biolucent spun-off its brachytherapy technology and business to the holders of biolucent 2019s outstanding shares of capital stock . as a result , the company only acquired biolucent 2019s mammopad cushion business and related assets . the company invested $ 1000 directly in the spun-off brachytherapy business in exchange for shares of preferred stock issued by the new business . the aggregate purchase price for biolucent was approximately $ 73200 , consisting of approximately $ 6800 in cash and 2314 shares of hologic common stock valued at approximately $ 63200 , debt assumed and paid off of approximately $ 1600 and approximately $ 1600 for acquisition related fees and expenses . the company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no . 99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination . the acquisition also provides for up to two annual earn-out payments not to exceed $ 15000 in the aggregate based on biolucent 2019s achievement of certain revenue targets . the company has considered the provision of eitf issue no . 95-8 , accounting for contingent consideration paid to the shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase business combination , and concluded that this contingent consideration will represent additional purchase price . as a result , goodwill will be increased by the amount of the additional consideration , if any , when it becomes due and payable . as of september 27 , 2008 , the company has not recorded any amounts for these potential earn-outs . the allocation of the purchase price is based upon estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of september 18 , 2007 . the components and allocation of the purchase price consists of the following approximate amounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>net tangible assets acquired as of september 18 2007</td><td>$ 2800</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>developed technology and know how</td><td>12300</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer relationship</td><td>17000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trade name</td><td>2800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred income tax liabilities net</td><td>-9500 ( 9500 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>47800</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>final purchase price</td><td>$ 73200</td></tr></table> as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued . it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name and developed technology and know-how had separately identifiable values . the fair value of these intangible assets was determined through the application of the income approach . customer relationship represents a large customer base that is expected to purchase the disposable mammopad product on a regular basis . trade name represents the .\nQuestion: what portion of the final purchase price of biolucent is for goodwill?\nAnswer: 0.65301\nQuestion: what is the estimated price of hologic common stock used in the biolucent acquisition?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "27.31201" } ]
CONVFINQA551	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )</td><td>$ 36.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>-26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>27.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .\nQuestion: what was the interest income from 2014?\nAnswer: 27.4\nQuestion: what was the income from 2013?\nAnswer: 24.7\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "52.1" } ]
CONVFINQA5221	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrealignment and other 201d expenses . acquisition , integration , realignment and other expenses for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , included ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations net</td><td>$ -1.5 ( 1.5 )</td><td>$ -10.4 ( 10.4 )</td><td>$ -1.2 ( 1.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>consulting and professional fees</td><td>11.7</td><td>13.2</td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>employee severance and retention including share-based compensation acceleration</td><td>19.0</td><td>0.2</td><td>1.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>information technology integration</td><td>1.1</td><td>0.7</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>in-process research & development</td><td>2013</td><td>38.5</td><td>6.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>vacated facilities</td><td>1.4</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>facility and employee relocation</td><td>5.4</td><td>7.5</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>distributor acquisitions</td><td>1.1</td><td>6.9</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>certain litigation matters</td><td>23.4</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>contract terminations</td><td>9.4</td><td>5.7</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other</td><td>4.3</td><td>6.2</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>acquisition integration realignment and other</td><td>$ 75.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 25.2</td></tr></table> adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations relates to impairment on assets that were acquired in business combinations or adjustments to certain liabilities of acquired companies due to changes in circumstances surrounding those liabilities subsequent to the related measurement period . consulting and professional fees relate to third-party integration consulting performed in a variety of areas such as tax , compliance , logistics and human resources and include third-party fees related to severance and termination benefits matters . these fees also include legal fees related to litigation matters involving acquired businesses that existed prior to our acquisition or resulted from our acquisition . during 2009 , we commenced a global realignment initiative to focus on business opportunities that best support our strategic priorities . as part of this realignment , we initiated changes in our work force , eliminating positions in some areas and increasing others . approximately 300 employees from across the globe were affected by these actions . as a result of these changes in our work force and headcount reductions from acquisitions , we recorded expense of $ 19.0 million related to severance and other employee termination-related costs . these termination benefits were provided in accordance with our existing or local government policies and are considered ongoing benefits . these costs were accrued when they became probable and estimable and were recorded as part of other current liabilities . the majority of these costs were paid during 2009 . information technology integration relates to the non- capitalizable costs associated with integrating the information systems of acquired businesses . in-process research and development charges for 2008 relate to the acquisition of abbott spine . in-process research and development charges for 2007 relate to the acquisitions of endius and orthosoft . in 2009 , we ceased using certain leased facilities and , accordingly , recorded expense for the remaining lease payments , less estimated sublease recoveries , and wrote-off any assets being used in those facilities . facility and employee relocation relates to costs associated with relocating certain facilities . most notably , we consolidated our legacy european distribution centers into a new distribution center in eschbach , germany . over the past three years we have acquired a number of u.s . and foreign-based distributors . we have incurred various costs related to the acquisition and integration of those businesses . certain litigation matters relate to costs recognized during the year for the estimated or actual settlement of various legal matters , including patent litigation matters , commercial litigation matters and matters arising from our acquisitions of certain competitive distributorships in prior years . we recognize expense for the potential settlement of a legal matter when we believe it is probable that a loss has been incurred and we can reasonably estimate the loss . in 2009 , we made a concerted effort to settle many of these matters to avoid further litigation costs . contract termination costs relate to terminated agreements in connection with the integration of acquired companies . the terminated contracts primarily relate to sales agents and distribution agreements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 we consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value . certificates of deposit 2013 we invest in cash deposits with original maturities greater than three months and classify these investments as certificates of deposit on our consolidated balance sheet . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for certificates of deposit are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value . inventories 2013 inventories , net of allowances for obsolete and slow-moving goods , are stated at the lower of cost or market , with cost determined on a first-in first-out basis . property , plant and equipment 2013 property , plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of ten to forty years for buildings and improvements and three to eight years for machinery and equipment . maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred . we review property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair value . z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 9 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg* transmitting job : c55340 pcn : 043000000 *%%pcmsg\|43 \|00008\|yes\|no\|02/24/2010 01:32\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what is the net change in consulting and professional fees from 2008 to 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.5" } ]
CONVFINQA8059	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndecember 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td><td>december 312014</td><td>december 312015</td><td>december 312016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 154.94</td><td>$ 220.70</td><td>$ 168.17</td><td>$ 130.24</td><td>$ 133.81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 150.40</td><td>$ 217.35</td><td>$ 175.04</td><td>$ 127.80</td><td>$ 137.83</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 155.17</td><td>$ 222.44</td><td>$ 178.89</td><td>$ 133.79</td><td>$ 142.07</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.41</td><td>$ 146.98</td><td>$ 163.72</td><td>$ 162.53</td><td>$ 178.02</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 134.98</td><td>$ 220.77</td><td>$ 253.19</td><td>$ 243.93</td><td>$ 271.11</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference . item 6 . selected financial data . the table set forth below presents our selected financial information for each of the past five years ( in millions , except per share amounts ) . the selected statement of operations information for each of the three years ended december 31 , 2016 and the selected balance sheet information as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 have been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the information in item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , 201d the audited consolidated financial statements included in item 8 , 201cfinancial statements and supplementary data , 201d and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report on form 10-k . the selected statement of operations information for each of the two years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 and the selected balance sheet information as of december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 have been derived from financial statements not included in this annual report on form 10-k . 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 selected statement of operations information : revenues $ 6497 $ 6394 $ 6265 $ 5535 $ 4487 operating income 2058 1985 2061 1975 1859 income from continuing operations , net of taxes 1218 1048 1137 1077 956 loss from discontinued operations , net of taxes 2014 2014 2014 2014 ( 11 ) net income 1218 1048 1137 1077 945 net income available to discovery communications , inc . 1194 1034 1139 1075 943 basic earnings per share available to discovery communications , inc . series a , b and c common stockholders : continuing operations $ 1.97 $ 1.59 $ 1.67 $ 1.50 $ 1.27 discontinued operations 2014 2014 2014 2014 ( 0.01 ) net income 1.97 1.59 1.67 1.50 1.25 diluted earnings per share available to discovery communications , inc . series a , b and c common stockholders : continuing operations $ 1.96 $ 1.58 $ 1.66 $ 1.49 $ 1.26 discontinued operations 2014 2014 2014 2014 ( 0.01 ) net income 1.96 1.58 1.66 1.49 1.24 weighted average shares outstanding : basic 401 432 454 484 498 diluted 610 656 687 722 759 selected balance sheet information : cash and cash equivalents $ 300 $ 390 $ 367 $ 408 $ 1201 total assets 15758 15864 15970 14934 12892 long-term debt : current portion 82 119 1107 17 31 long-term portion 7841 7616 6002 6437 5174 total liabilities 10348 10172 9619 8701 6599 redeemable noncontrolling interests 243 241 747 36 2014 equity attributable to discovery communications , inc . 5167 5451 5602 6196 6291 total equity $ 5167 $ 5451 $ 5604 $ 6197 $ 6293 2022 income per share amounts may not sum since each is calculated independently . 2022 on september 30 , 2016 , the company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $ 62 million related to its investment in lionsgate . on december 2 , 2016 , the company acquired a 39% ( 39 % ) minority interest in group nine media , a newly formed media holding company , in exchange for contributions of $ 100 million and the company's digital network businesses seeker and sourcefed , resulting in a gain of $ 50 million upon deconsolidation of the businesses . ( see note 4 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. ) .\nQuestion: what was the value of the disca in 2016?\nAnswer: 133.81\nQuestion: and what was the change in its value from 2011 to 2016??\nAnswer: 33.81\nQuestion: how much, then, does this change represent in relation to the original value of 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.3381" } ]
CONVFINQA2704	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 125 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to meet the financing needs of its customers . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the counterparties draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees , and the counterparties subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s actual future credit exposure or funding requirements . in determining the amount of credit risk exposure the firm has to wholesale lending-related commitments , which is used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these commitments , the firm has established a 201cloan-equivalent 201d amount for each commitment ; this amount represents the portion of the unused commitment or other contingent exposure that is expected , based on average portfolio historical experience , to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor . the loan-equivalent amount of the firm 2019s lending- related commitments was $ 229.6 billion and $ 218.9 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into securities and derivative transactions . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by central counterparties ( 201cccps 201d ) . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , see note 29 . derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 33725</td><td>$ 25782</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>1838</td><td>1516</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>21253</td><td>16790</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity</td><td>8177</td><td>12227</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>13982</td><td>9444</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>78975</td><td>65759</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables</td><td>-19604 ( 19604 )</td><td>-14435 ( 14435 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 59371</td><td>$ 51324</td></tr></table> derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 79.0 billion and $ 65.8 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts , after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other g7 government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 19.6 billion and $ 14.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily : cash ; g7 government securities ; other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities ; and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the firm held $ 48.6 billion and $ 50.8 billion , respectively , of this additional collateral . the prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6. .\nQuestion: what is the total balance of liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables in 2014 and 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "34039.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9418	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntax benefits recognized for stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , were $ 16 million , $ 6 million and $ 5 million , respectively . the amount of northrop grumman shares issued before the spin-off to satisfy stock-based compensation awards are recorded by northrop grumman and , accordingly , are not reflected in hii 2019s consolidated financial statements . the company realized tax benefits during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , of $ 2 million from the exercise of stock options and $ 10 million from the issuance of stock in settlement of rpsrs and rsrs . unrecognized compensation expense at december 31 , 2011 there was $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years . in addition , at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 19 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rsrs , which will be recognized over a period of 2.2 years ; $ 10 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the rpsrs converted as part of the spin-off , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of one year ; and $ 18 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rpsrs which will be recognized over a period of 2.0 years . stock options the compensation expense for the outstanding converted stock options was determined at the time of grant by northrop grumman . there were no additional options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . the fair value of the stock option awards is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options . the fair value of each of the stock option award was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions : dividend yield 2014the dividend yield was based on northrop grumman 2019s historical dividend yield level . volatility 2014expected volatility was based on the average of the implied volatility from traded options and the historical volatility of northrop grumman 2019s stock . risk-free interest rate 2014the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the stock option award was based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon u.s . treasury bond on the date the award was granted with a maturity equal to the expected term of the award . expected term 2014the expected term of awards granted was derived from historical experience and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . a stratification of expected terms based on employee populations ( executive and non-executive ) was considered in the analysis . the following significant weighted-average assumptions were used to value stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.6% ( 3.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility rate</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option life ( years )</td><td>6</td><td>5 & 6</td></tr></table> the weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was $ 11 and $ 7 , per share , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options in 2010?\nAnswer: 11.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2009?\nAnswer: 7.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 4.0\nQuestion: what was the weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options in 2009?\nAnswer: 7.0\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2009 fair value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.57143" } ]
CONVFINQA2880	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations executive summary international paper 2019s operating results in 2006 bene- fited from strong gains in pricing and sales volumes and lower operating costs . our average paper and packaging prices in 2006 increased faster than our costs for the first time in four years . the improve- ment in sales volumes reflects increased uncoated papers , corrugated box , coated paperboard and european papers shipments , as well as improved revenues from our xpedx distribution business . our manufacturing operations also made solid cost reduction improvements . lower interest expense , reflecting debt repayments in 2005 and 2006 , was also a positive factor . together , these improvements more than offset the effects of continued high raw material and distribution costs , lower real estate sales , higher net corporate expenses and lower con- tributions from businesses and forestlands divested during 2006 . looking forward to 2007 , we expect seasonally higher sales volumes in the first quarter . average paper price realizations should continue to improve as we implement previously announced price increases in europe and brazil . input costs for energy , fiber and chemicals are expected to be mixed , although slightly higher in the first quarter . operating results will benefit from the recently completed international paper/sun paperboard joint ventures in china and the addition of the luiz anto- nio paper mill to our operations in brazil . however , primarily as a result of lower real estate sales in the first quarter , we anticipate earnings from continuing operations will be somewhat lower than in the 2006 fourth quarter . significant steps were also taken in 2006 in the execution of the company 2019s transformation plan . we completed the sales of our u.s . and brazilian coated papers businesses and 5.6 million acres of u.s . forestlands , and announced definitive sale agreements for our kraft papers , beverage pack- aging and arizona chemical businesses and a majority of our wood products business , all expected to close during 2007 . through december 31 , 2006 , we have received approximately $ 9.7 billion of the estimated proceeds from divest- itures announced under this plan of approximately $ 11.3 billion , with the balance to be received as the remaining divestitures are completed in the first half of 2007 . we have strengthened our balance sheet by reducing debt by $ 6.2 billion , and returned value to our shareholders by repurchasing 39.7 million shares of our common stock for approximately $ 1.4 billion . we made a $ 1.0 billion voluntary contribution to our u.s . qualified pension fund . we have identified selective reinvestment opportunities totaling approx- imately $ 2.0 billion , including opportunities in china , brazil and russia . finally , we remain focused on our three-year $ 1.2 billion target for non-price profit- ability improvements , with $ 330 million realized during 2006 . while more remains to be done in 2007 , we have made substantial progress toward achiev- ing the objectives announced at the outset of the plan in july 2005 . results of operations industry segment operating profits are used by inter- national paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses . management believes that this measure allows a better under- standing of trends in costs , operating efficiencies , prices and volumes . industry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items . industry segment oper- ating profits are defined by the securities and exchange commission as a non-gaap financial measure , and are not gaap alternatives to net income or any other operating measure prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the united states . international paper operates in six segments : print- ing papers , industrial packaging , consumer pack- aging , distribution , forest products and specialty businesses and other . the following table shows the components of net earnings ( loss ) for each of the last three years : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industry segment operating profits</td><td>$ 2074</td><td>$ 1622</td><td>$ 1703</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>corporate items net</td><td>-746 ( 746 )</td><td>-607 ( 607 )</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate special items</td><td>2373</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>-141 ( 141 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>-521 ( 521 )</td><td>-595 ( 595 )</td><td>-712 ( 712 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interest</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax ( provision ) benefit</td><td>-1889 ( 1889 )</td><td>407</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>discontinued operations</td><td>-232 ( 232 )</td><td>416</td><td>-273 ( 273 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>$ 1050</td><td>$ 1100</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td></tr></table> corporate special items include gains on transformation plan forestland sales , goodwill impairment charges , restructuring and other charges , net losses on sales and impairments of businesses , insurance recoveries and reversals of reserves no longer required. .\nQuestion: what is the industry segment operating profits in 2006?\nAnswer: 2074.0\nQuestion: what about in 2005?\nAnswer: 1622.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 452.0\nQuestion: what is the industry segment operating profits in 2005?\nAnswer: 1622.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.27867" } ]
CONVFINQA9532	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nprojected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 980</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1185</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>978</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1022</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1425</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013 - 2017</td><td>$ 8147</td></tr></table> ( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the value of projected payments in 2010?\nAnswer: 978.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2009?\nAnswer: 1185.0\nQuestion: what is the net difference?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-207.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4712	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstrategy our mission is to achieve sustainable revenue and earnings growth through providing superior solutions to our customers . our strategy to achieve this has been and will continue to be built on the following pillars : 2022 expand client relationships 2014 the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-product purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can drive meaningful value and cost savings to our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and speed for our clients' customers . 2022 buy , build or partner to add solutions to cross-sell 2014 we continue to invest in growth through internal product development , as well as through product-focused or market-centric acquisitions that complement and extend our existing capabilities and provide us with additional solutions to cross-sell . we also partner from time to time with other entities to provide comprehensive offerings to our customers . by investing in solution innovation and integration , we continue to expand our value proposition to clients . 2022 support our clients through market transformation 2014 the changing market dynamics are transforming the way our clients operate , which is driving incremental demand for our leveraged solutions , consulting expertise , and services around intellectual property . our depth of services capabilities enables us to become involved earlier in the planning and design process to assist our clients as they manage through these changes . 2022 continually improve to drive margin expansion 2014 we strive to optimize our performance through investments in infrastructure enhancements and other measures that are designed to drive organic revenue growth and margin expansion . 2022 build global diversification 2014 we continue to deploy resources in emerging global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes the revenues by our reporting segments ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fsg</td><td>$ 2246.4</td><td>$ 2076.8</td><td>$ 1890.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>psg</td><td>2380.6</td><td>2372.1</td><td>2354.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>isg</td><td>1180.5</td><td>1177.6</td><td>917.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>corporate & other</td><td>0.1</td><td>-0.9 ( 0.9 )</td><td>-16.4 ( 16.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 5807.6</td><td>$ 5625.6</td><td>$ 5145.6</td></tr></table> financial solutions group the focus of fsg is to provide the most comprehensive software and services for the core processing , customer channel , treasury services , cash management , wealth management and capital market operations of our financial institution customers in north america . we service the core and related ancillary processing needs of north american banks , credit unions , automotive financial companies , commercial lenders , and independent community and savings institutions . fis offers a broad selection of in-house and outsourced solutions to banking customers that span the range of asset sizes . fsg customers are typically committed under multi-year contracts that provide a stable , recurring revenue base and opportunities for cross-selling additional financial and payments offerings . we employ several business models to provide our solutions to our customers . we typically deliver the highest value to our customers when we combine our software applications and deliver them in one of several types of outsourcing arrangements , such as an application service provider , facilities management processing or an application management arrangement . we are also able to deliver individual applications through a software licensing arrangement . based upon our expertise gained through the foregoing arrangements , some clients also retain us to manage their it operations without using any of our proprietary software . our solutions in this segment include: .\nQuestion: what is the total consolidated revenues in 2012?\nAnswer: 5807.6\nQuestion: what about in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5625.6" } ]
CONVFINQA2856	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfinancial statement impact we believe that our accruals for sales returns , rebates , and discounts are reasonable and appropriate based on current facts and circumstances . our global rebate and discount liabilities are included in sales rebates and discounts on our consolidated balance sheet . our global sales return liability is included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . as of december 31 , 2018 , a 5 percent change in our global sales return , rebate , and discount liability would have led to an approximate $ 275 million effect on our income before income taxes . the portion of our global sales return , rebate , and discount liability resulting from sales of our products in the u.s . was approximately 90 percent as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 . the following represents a roll-forward of our most significant u.s . pharmaceutical sales return , rebate , and discount liability balances , including managed care , medicare , and medicaid: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales return rebate and discount liabilities beginning of year</td><td>$ 4172.0</td><td>$ 3601.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reduction of net sales due to sales returns discounts and rebates ( 1 )</td><td>12529.6</td><td>10603.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash payments of discounts and rebates</td><td>-12023.4 ( 12023.4 )</td><td>-10033.2 ( 10033.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sales return rebate and discount liabilities end of year</td><td>$ 4678.2</td><td>$ 4172.0</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) adjustments of the estimates for these returns , rebates , and discounts to actual results were approximately 1 percent of consolidated net sales for each of the years presented . product litigation liabilities and other contingencies background and uncertainties product litigation liabilities and other contingencies are , by their nature , uncertain and based upon complex judgments and probabilities . the factors we consider in developing our product litigation liability reserves and other contingent liability amounts include the merits and jurisdiction of the litigation , the nature and the number of other similar current and past matters , the nature of the product and the current assessment of the science subject to the litigation , and the likelihood of settlement and current state of settlement discussions , if any . in addition , we accrue for certain product liability claims incurred , but not filed , to the extent we can formulate a reasonable estimate of their costs based primarily on historical claims experience and data regarding product usage . we accrue legal defense costs expected to be incurred in connection with significant product liability contingencies when both probable and reasonably estimable . we also consider the insurance coverage we have to diminish the exposure for periods covered by insurance . in assessing our insurance coverage , we consider the policy coverage limits and exclusions , the potential for denial of coverage by the insurance company , the financial condition of the insurers , and the possibility of and length of time for collection . due to a very restrictive market for product liability insurance , we are self-insured for product liability losses for all our currently marketed products . in addition to insurance coverage , we also consider any third-party indemnification to which we are entitled or under which we are obligated . with respect to our third-party indemnification rights , these considerations include the nature of the indemnification , the financial condition of the indemnifying party , and the possibility of and length of time for collection . the litigation accruals and environmental liabilities and the related estimated insurance recoverables have been reflected on a gross basis as liabilities and assets , respectively , on our consolidated balance sheets . impairment of indefinite-lived and long-lived assets background and uncertainties we review the carrying value of long-lived assets ( both intangible and tangible ) for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset ( or asset group ) may not be recoverable . we identify impairment by comparing the projected undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset ( or asset group ) to its carrying value . if an impairment is identified , a loss is recorded equal to the excess of the asset 2019s net book value over its fair value , and the cost basis is adjusted . goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . when required , a comparison of fair value to the carrying amount of assets is performed to determine the amount of any impairment. .\nQuestion: what was the value of u.s . pharmaceutical sales return , rebate , and discount liability balances , including managed care , medicare , and medicaid in 2018?\nAnswer: 4678.2\nQuestion: what was the value of u.s . pharmaceutical sales return , rebate , and discount liability balances , including managed care , medicare , and medicaid in 2017?\nAnswer: 4172.0\nQuestion: what was the net change in values?\nAnswer: 506.2\nQuestion: what was the value of u.s . pharmaceutical sales return , rebate , and discount liability balances , including managed care , medicare , and medicaid in 2017?\nAnswer: 4172.0\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.12133" } ]
CONVFINQA11091	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncritical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 the valuation of our investment portfolio and assessment of other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses overview and key data as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but are unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations on claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional development on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . loss reserves also include an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2009 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.8 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 25 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim pay- ments are reliably determinable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry net reserves of $ 76 million , net of discount . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>2009 gross losses</td><td>2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )</td><td>2009 net losses</td><td>2009 gross losses</td><td>2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td><td>$ 37112</td><td>$ 13520</td><td>$ 23592</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>11141</td><td>3719</td><td>7422</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-11093 ( 11093 )</td><td>-4145 ( 4145 )</td><td>-6948 ( 6948 )</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>559</td><td>236</td><td>323</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 37783</td><td>$ 12745</td><td>$ 25038</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) net of provision for uncollectible reinsurance .\nQuestion: what were the gross unpaid losses in the end of the year of 2009, in millions?\nAnswer: 37783.0\nQuestion: and what were they in the beginning of that year, also in millions?\nAnswer: 37176.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in gross unpaid losses over the year, in millions?\nAnswer: 607.0\nQuestion: what were, in millions, the gross unpaid losses in the beginning of the year of 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "37176.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8934	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvornado realty trust 77 cash flows the company expects to contribute $ 959000 to the plans in 2004 . 11 . leases as lessor : the company leases space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . shopping center leases provide for the pass-through to tenants of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse the company for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2003 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 1084934</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>968162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>846345</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>770228</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>608267</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>3423083</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 3662000 , $ 1832000 , and $ 2157000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 . except for the u.s . government , which accounted for 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) of the company 2019s revenue , none of the company 2019s tenants represented more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . former bradlees locations property rentals for the year ended december 31 , 2003 , include $ 5000000 of additional rent which , effective december 31 , 2002 , was re-allocated to the former bradlees locations in marlton , turnersville , bensalem and broomall and is payable by stop & shop , pursuant to the master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 . this amount is in addition to all other rent guaranteed by stop & shop for the former bradlees locations . on january 8 , 2003 , stop & shop filed a complaint with the united states district court claiming the company has no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $ 5000000 of annual rent from stop & shop because of the expiration of the east brunswick , jersey city , middletown , union and woodbridge leases to which the $ 5000000 of additional rent was previously allocated . the company believes the additional rent provision of the guaranty expires at the earliest in 2012 and will vigorously oppose stop & shop 2019s complaint . in february 2003 , koninklijke ahold nv , parent of stop & shop , announced that it overstated its 2002 and 2001 earnings by at least $ 500 million and is under investigation by the u.s . justice department and securities and exchange commission . the company cannot predict what effect , if any , this situation may have on stop & shop 2019s ability to satisfy its obligation under the bradlees guarantees and rent for existing stop & shop leases aggregating approximately $ 10.5 million per annum . notes to consolidated financial statements sr-176_fin_l02p53_82v1.qxd 4/8/04 2:42 pm page 77 .\nQuestion: what was the percentage rent in 2002, in thousands?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1832000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA604	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperiod . the discount reflects our incremental borrowing rate , which matches the lifetime of the liability . significant changes in the discount rate selected or the estimations of sublease income in the case of leases could impact the amounts recorded . other associated costs with restructuring activities we recognize other costs associated with restructuring activities as they are incurred , including moving costs and consulting and legal fees . pensions we sponsor defined benefit pension plans throughout the world . our most significant plans are located in the u.s. , the u.k. , the netherlands and canada . our significant u.s. , u.k . and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants . we have ceased crediting future benefits relating to salary and service for our u.s. , u.k . and canadian plans . recognition of gains and losses and prior service certain changes in the value of the obligation and in the value of plan assets , which may occur due to various factors such as changes in the discount rate and actuarial assumptions , actual demographic experience and/or plan asset performance are not immediately recognized in net income . such changes are recognized in other comprehensive income and are amortized into net income as part of the net periodic benefit cost . unrecognized gains and losses that have been deferred in other comprehensive income , as previously described , are amortized into compensation and benefits expense as a component of periodic pension expense based on the average expected future service of active employees for our plans in the netherlands and canada , or the average life expectancy of the u.s . and u.k . plan members . after the effective date of the plan amendments to cease crediting future benefits relating to service , unrecognized gains and losses are also be based on the average life expectancy of members in the canadian plans . we amortize any prior service expense or credits that arise as a result of plan changes over a period consistent with the amortization of gains and losses . as of december 31 , 2013 , our pension plans have deferred losses that have not yet been recognized through income in the consolidated financial statements . we amortize unrecognized actuarial losses outside of a corridor , which is defined as 10% ( 10 % ) of the greater of market-related value of plan assets or projected benefit obligation . to the extent not offset by future gains , incremental amortization as calculated above will continue to affect future pension expense similarly until fully amortized . the following table discloses our combined experience loss , the number of years over which we are amortizing the experience loss , and the estimated 2014 amortization of loss by country ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.k .</td><td>u.s .</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>combined experience loss</td><td>$ 2012</td><td>$ 1219</td><td>$ 402</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization period ( in years )</td><td>29</td><td>26</td><td>11 - 23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>estimated 2014 amortization of loss</td><td>$ 53</td><td>$ 44</td><td>$ 10</td></tr></table> the unrecognized prior service cost at december 31 , 2013 was $ 27 million in the u.k . and other plans . for the u.s . pension plans we use a market-related valuation of assets approach to determine the expected return on assets , which is a component of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income . this approach recognizes 20% ( 20 % ) of any gains or losses in the current year's value of market-related assets , with the remaining 80% ( 80 % ) spread over the next four years . as this approach recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period , the future value of assets and therefore , our net periodic benefit cost will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded . as of december 31 , 2013 , the market-related value of assets was $ 1.8 billion . we do not use the market-related valuation approach to determine the funded status of the u.s . plans recorded in the consolidated statements of financial position . instead , we record and present the funded status in the consolidated statements of financial position based on the fair value of the plan assets . as of december 31 , 2013 , the fair value of plan assets was $ 1.9 billion . our non-u.s . plans use fair value to determine expected return on assets. .\nQuestion: what is the combined experience loss for uk and us?\nAnswer: 3231.0\nQuestion: what about if other is included?\nAnswer: 3633.0\nQuestion: what is the fair value of plan assets?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.9" } ]
CONVFINQA2804	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naffiliated company . the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc . the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company . during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india . cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment . in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million . tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen . the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million . with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 . approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no . 142 and ceased amortization of goodwill . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million . the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 . songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas . the sale is expected to close in early 2003 . see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction . the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 6147</td><td>$ 6241</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>695</td><td>1717</td><td>1989</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>229</td><td>650</td><td>859</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>1097</td><td>3700</td><td>2423</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>6751</td><td>14942</td><td>13080</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>1418</td><td>3510</td><td>3370</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>3349</td><td>8297</td><td>5927</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>3081</td><td>6835</td><td>6206</td></tr></table> in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 . the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively . the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the value of revenues in 2002?\nAnswer: 2832.0\nQuestion: what was the value of revenues in 2001?\nAnswer: 6147.0\nQuestion: what is the net difference in revenues?\nAnswer: -3315.0\nQuestion: what was the value of revenues in 2001?\nAnswer: 6147.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.53929" } ]
CONVFINQA8568	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 secondary market same store communities are generally communities in markets with populations of more than 1 million but less than 1% ( 1 % ) of the total public multifamily reit units or markets with populations of less than 1 million that we have owned and have been stabilized for at least a full 12 months . 2022 non-same store communities and other includes recent acquisitions , communities in development or lease-up , communities that have been identified for disposition , and communities that have undergone a significant casualty loss . also included in non-same store communities are non-multifamily activities . on the first day of each calendar year , we determine the composition of our same store operating segments for that year as well as adjust the previous year , which allows us to evaluate full period-over-period operating comparisons . an apartment community in development or lease-up is added to the same store portfolio on the first day of the calendar year after it has been owned and stabilized for at least a full 12 months . communities are considered stabilized after achieving 90% ( 90 % ) occupancy for 90 days . communities that have been identified for disposition are excluded from the same store portfolio . all properties acquired from post properties in the merger remained in the non-same store and other operating segment during 2017 , as the properties were recent acquisitions and had not been owned and stabilized for at least 12 months as of january 1 , 2017 . for additional information regarding our operating segments , see note 14 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report on form 10-k . acquisitions one of our growth strategies is to acquire apartment communities that are located in various large or secondary markets primarily throughout the southeast and southwest regions of the united states . acquisitions , along with dispositions , help us achieve and maintain our desired product mix , geographic diversification and asset allocation . portfolio growth allows for maximizing the efficiency of the existing management and overhead structure . we have extensive experience in the acquisition of multifamily communities . we will continue to evaluate opportunities that arise , and we will utilize this strategy to increase our number of apartment communities in strong and growing markets . we acquired the following apartment communities during the year ended december 31 , 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>community</td><td>market</td><td>units</td><td>closing date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>charlotte at midtown</td><td>nashville tn</td><td>279</td><td>march 16 2017</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acklen west end</td><td>nashville tn</td><td>320</td><td>december 28 2017</td></tr></table> dispositions we sell apartment communities and other assets that no longer meet our long-term strategy or when market conditions are favorable , and we redeploy the proceeds from those sales to acquire , develop and redevelop additional apartment communities and rebalance our portfolio across or within geographic regions . dispositions also allow us to realize a portion of the value created through our investments and provide additional liquidity . we are then able to redeploy the net proceeds from our dispositions in lieu of raising additional capital . in deciding to sell an apartment community , we consider current market conditions and generally solicit competing bids from unrelated parties for these individual assets , considering the sales price and other key terms of each proposal . we also consider portfolio dispositions when such a structure is useful to maximize proceeds and efficiency of execution . during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , we disposed of five multifamily properties totaling 1760 units and four land parcels totaling approximately 23 acres . development as another part of our growth strategy , we invest in a limited number of development projects . development activities may be conducted through wholly-owned affiliated companies or through joint ventures with unaffiliated parties . fixed price construction contracts are signed with unrelated parties to minimize construction risk . we typically manage the leasing portion of the project as units become available for lease . we may also engage in limited expansion development opportunities on existing communities in which we typically serve as the developer . while we seek opportunistic new development investments offering attractive long-term investment returns , we intend to maintain a total development commitment that we consider modest in relation to our total balance sheet and investment portfolio . during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , we incurred $ 170.1 million in development costs and completed 7 development projects. .\nQuestion: what was the number of units acquired in the community of charlotte at midtown?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "279.0" } ]
CONVFINQA264	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the valuation allowance increased from $ 47.8 million as of december 31 , 2009 to $ 48.2 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the increase was primarily due to valuation allowances on foreign loss carryforwards . at december 31 , 2010 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 48.2 million which primarily relates to state net operating loss carryforwards , equity investments and foreign items . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient taxable income to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . valuation allowances may be reversed if related deferred tax assets are deemed realizable based on changes in facts and circumstances relevant to the assets 2019 recoverability . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 in the table above do not include $ 122.1 million and $ 113.9 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses . total stockholders 2019 equity as of december 31 , 2010 will be increased by $ 122.1 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.2 billion , including losses related to employee stock options of $ 0.3 billion . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>federal</td><td>state</td><td>foreign</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011 to 2015</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 503</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016 to 2020</td><td>2014</td><td>331315</td><td>5509</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021 to 2025</td><td>774209</td><td>576780</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2026 to 2030</td><td>423398</td><td>279908</td><td>92412</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1197607</td><td>$ 1188003</td><td>$ 98424</td></tr></table> in addition , the company has mexican tax credits of $ 5.2 million which if not utilized would expire in 2017. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2010, what amount from the total net operating loss carry forwards was set to expire between 2021 and 2025?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "774209.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3568	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmasco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>34% ( 34 % )</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as \"the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.\" following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( \"nav\" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. .\nQuestion: what were the debt securities in 2018?\nAnswer: 49.0\nQuestion: and what were they in 2017?\nAnswer: 28.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the increase over the year?\nAnswer: 21.0\nQuestion: and what is this increase as a percentage of the 2017 debt securities?\nAnswer: 0.75\nQuestion: and in that same year of 2018, how much did the debt securities represent in relation to the equity ones?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.44118" } ]
CONVFINQA2408	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table presents the estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation reported in both cost of revenue and operating expenses : fiscal year ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal year</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 3677</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>2403</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>840</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>250</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation</td><td>$ 7170</td></tr></table> impairment of intangible assets . in fiscal 2002 , we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $ 3.8 million to reduce the amount of certain intangible assets associated with prior acquisitions to their estimated fair value . approximately $ 3.7 million and $ 0.1 million are included in integration expense and amortization of intangible assets , respectively , on the consolidated statement of operations . the impairment charge is primarily attributable to certain technology acquired from and goodwill related to the acquisition of stanza , inc . ( stanza ) in 1999 . during fiscal 2002 , we determined that we would not allocate future resources to assist in the market growth of this technology as products acquired in the merger with avant! provided customers with superior capabilities . as a result , we do not anticipate any future sales of the stanza product . in fiscal 2001 , we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $ 2.2 million to reduce the amount of certain intangible assets associated with prior acquisitions to their estimated fair value . approximately $ 1.8 million and $ 0.4 million are included in cost of revenues and amortization of intangible assets , respectively , on the consolidated statement of operations . the impairment charge is attributable to certain technology acquired from and goodwill related to the acquisition of eagle design automation , inc . ( eagle ) in 1997 . during fiscal 2001 , we determined that we would not allocate future resources to assist in the market growth of this technology . as a result , we do not anticipate any future sales of the eagle product . there were no impairment charges during fiscal 2003 . other ( expense ) income , net . other income , net was $ 24.1 million in fiscal 2003 and consisted primarily of ( i ) realized gain on investments of $ 20.7 million ; ( ii ) rental income of $ 6.3 million ; ( iii ) interest income of $ 5.2 million ; ( iv ) impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio of ( $ 4.5 ) million ; ( vii ) foundation contributions of ( $ 2.1 ) million ; and ( viii ) interest expense of ( $ 1.6 ) million . other ( expense ) , net of other income was ( $ 208.6 ) million in fiscal 2002 and consisted primarily of ( i ) ( $ 240.8 ) million expense due to the settlement of the cadence design systems , inc . ( cadence ) litigation ; ( ii ) ( $ 11.3 ) million in impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio ; ( iii ) realized gains on investments of $ 22.7 million ; ( iv ) a gain of $ 3.1 million for the termination fee on the ikos systems , inc . ( ikos ) merger agreement ; ( v ) rental income of $ 10.0 million ; ( vi ) interest income of $ 8.3 million ; and ( vii ) and other miscellaneous expenses including amortization of premium forwards and foreign exchange gains and losses recognized during the fiscal year of ( $ 0.6 ) million . other income , net was $ 83.8 million in fiscal 2001 and consisted primarily of ( i ) a gain of $ 10.6 million on the sale of our silicon libraries business to artisan components , inc. ; ( ii ) ( $ 5.8 ) million in impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio ; ( iii ) realized gains on investments of $ 55.3 million ; ( iv ) rental income of $ 8.6 million ; ( v ) interest income of $ 12.8 million ; and ( vi ) other miscellaneous income including amortization of premium forwards and foreign exchange gains and losses recognized during the fiscal year of $ 2.3 million . termination of agreement to acquire ikos systems , inc . on july 2 , 2001 , we entered into an agreement and plan of merger and reorganization ( the ikos merger agreement ) with ikos systems , inc . the ikos merger agreement provided for the acquisition of all outstanding shares of ikos common stock by synopsys. .\nQuestion: what was the estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation in 2005 less that in 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-1274.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6034	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnew accounting pronouncements information regarding new accounting pronouncements is included in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements . financial condition and liquidity the company generates significant ongoing cash flow . increases in long-term debt have been used , in part , to fund share repurchase activities and acquisitions . on november 15 , 2007 , 3m ( safety , security and protection services business ) announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement for 3m 2019s acquisition of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of aearo holding corp . e83a a global leader in the personal protection industry that manufactures and markets personal protection and energy absorbing products e83a for approximately $ 1.2 billion . the sale is expected to close towards the end of the first quarter of 2008 . at december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 4920</td><td>$ 3553</td><td>$ 2381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>2955</td><td>2084</td><td>1072</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net debt</td><td>$ 1965</td><td>$ 1469</td><td>$ 1309</td></tr></table> cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaled approximately $ 3 billion , helped by strong cash flow generation and by the timing of debt issuances . at december 31 , 2006 , cash balances were higher due to the significant pharmaceuticals sales proceeds received in december 2006 . 3m believes its ongoing cash flows provide ample cash to fund expected investments and capital expenditures . the company has sufficient access to capital markets to meet currently anticipated growth and acquisition investment funding needs . the company does not utilize derivative instruments linked to the company 2019s stock . however , the company does have contingently convertible debt that , if conditions for conversion are met , is convertible into shares of 3m common stock ( refer to note 10 in this document ) . the company 2019s financial condition and liquidity are strong . various assets and liabilities , including cash and short-term debt , can fluctuate significantly from month to month depending on short-term liquidity needs . working capital ( defined as current assets minus current liabilities ) totaled $ 4.476 billion at december 31 , 2007 , compared with $ 1.623 billion at december 31 , 2006 . working capital was higher primarily due to increases in cash and cash equivalents , short-term marketable securities , receivables and inventories and decreases in short-term debt and accrued income taxes . the company 2019s liquidity remains strong , with cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaling approximately $ 3 billion . primary short-term liquidity needs are provided through u.s . commercial paper and euro commercial paper issuances . as of december 31 , 2007 , outstanding total commercial paper issued totaled $ 349 million and averaged $ 1.249 billion during 2007 . the company believes it unlikely that its access to the commercial paper market will be restricted . in june 2007 , the company established a medium-term notes program through which up to $ 3 billion of medium-term notes may be offered , with remaining shelf borrowing capacity of $ 2.5 billion as of december 31 , 2007 . on april 30 , 2007 , the company replaced its $ 565-million credit facility with a new $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility , which has provisions for the company to request an increase of the facility up to $ 2 billion ( at the lenders 2019 discretion ) , and providing for up to $ 150 million in letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are $ 110 million in letters of credit drawn against the facility . at december 31 , 2007 , available short-term committed lines of credit internationally totaled approximately $ 67 million , of which $ 13 million was utilized . debt covenants do not restrict the payment of dividends . the company has a \"well-known seasoned issuer\" shelf registration statement , effective february 24 , 2006 , to register an indeterminate amount of debt or equity securities for future sales . the company intends to use the proceeds from future securities sales off this shelf for general corporate purposes . at december 31 , 2007 , certain debt agreements ( $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities and $ 87 million of esop debt ) had ratings triggers ( bbb-/baa3 or lower ) that would require repayment of debt . the company has an aa credit rating , with a stable outlook , from standard & poor 2019s and an aa1 credit rating , with a negative outlook , from moody 2019s investors service . in addition , under the $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility agreement , 3m is required to maintain its ebitda to interest ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter at not less than 3.0 to 1 . this is calculated ( as defined in the agreement ) as the ratio of consolidated total ebitda for the four consecutive quarters then ended to total interest expense on all funded debt for the same period . at december 31 , 2007 , this ratio was approximately 35 to 1. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in working capital between 2006 and 2007?\nAnswer: 2.853\nQuestion: and the specific value for 2006 again?\nAnswer: 1.623\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.75786" } ]
CONVFINQA8294	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 9 . retirement plan we maintain a defined contribution pension plan covering full-time shoreside employees who have completed the minimum period of continuous service . annual contributions to the plan are based on fixed percentages of participants 2019 salaries and years of service , not to exceed certain maximums . pension cost was $ 13.9 million , $ 12.8 million and $ 12.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . note 10 . income taxes we and the majority of our subsidiaries are currently exempt from united states corporate tax on income from the international opera- tion of ships pursuant to section 883 of the internal revenue code . income tax expense related to our remaining subsidiaries was not significant for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 . final regulations under section 883 were published on august 26 , 2003 , and were effective for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . these regulations confirmed that we qualify for the exemption provid- ed by section 883 , but also narrowed the scope of activities which are considered by the internal revenue service to be incidental to the international operation of ships . the activities listed in the regula- tions as not being incidental to the international operation of ships include income from the sale of air and other transportation such as transfers , shore excursions and pre and post cruise tours . to the extent the income from such activities is earned from sources within the united states , such income will be subject to united states taxa- tion . the application of these new regulations reduced our net income for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 by approximately $ 6.3 million and $ 14.0 million , respectively . note 11 . financial instruments the estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 104520</td><td>$ 125385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt ( including current portion of long-term debt )</td><td>-5474988 ( 5474988 )</td><td>-4368874 ( 4368874 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency forward contracts in a net ( loss ) gain position</td><td>104159</td><td>-115415 ( 115415 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest rate swap agreements in a net receivable position</td><td>5856</td><td>8456</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel swap agreements in a net payable position</td><td>-20456 ( 20456 )</td><td>-78 ( 78 )</td></tr></table> long-term debt ( including current portion of long-term debt ) ( 5474988 ) ( 4368874 ) foreign currency forward contracts in a net ( loss ) gain position 104159 ( 115415 ) interest rate swap agreements in a net receivable position 5856 8456 fuel swap agreements in a net payable position ( 20456 ) ( 78 ) the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2006 or 2005 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . our financial instruments are not held for trading or speculative purposes . our exposure under foreign currency contracts , interest rate and fuel swap agreements is limited to the cost of replacing the contracts in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the contracts , all of which are currently our lending banks . to minimize this risk , we select counterparties with credit risks acceptable to us and we limit our exposure to an individual counterparty . furthermore , all foreign currency forward contracts are denominated in primary currencies . cash and cash equivalents the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments . long-term debt the fair values of our senior notes and senior debentures were esti- mated by obtaining quoted market prices . the fair values of all other debt were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on market rates available to us for similar debt with the same remaining maturities . foreign currency contracts the fair values of our foreign currency forward contracts were esti- mated using current market prices for similar instruments . our expo- sure to market risk for fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relates to six ship construction contracts and forecasted transactions . we use foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates . as of december 31 , 2006 , we had foreign currency forward contracts in a notional amount of $ 3.8 billion maturing through 2009 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts related to the six ship construction contracts , which are designated as fair value hedges , was a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 106.3 mil- lion . at december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of our foreign currency for- ward contracts related to three ship construction contracts , designated as fair value hedges , was a net unrealized loss of approx- imately $ 103.4 million . the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts related to the other ship construction contract at december 31 , 2005 , which was designated as a cash flow hedge , was an unre- alized loss , of approximately $ 7.8 million . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of the aggregate cost of the ships was exposed to fluctuations in the euro exchange rate . r o y a l c a r i b b e a n c r u i s e s l t d . 3 5 notes to the consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 51392_financials-v9.qxp 6/7/07 3:40 pm page 35 .\nQuestion: what was the total of cash and cash equivalents in 2006?\nAnswer: 104520.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2005?\nAnswer: 125385.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the combined total of cash and cash equivalents for both of those years?\nAnswer: 229905.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of long-term debt in that same period?\nAnswer: 9843862.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does the combined total of cash and cash equivalents represent in relation to this total of long-term debt?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.02336" } ]
CONVFINQA9644	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncontractual obligations . the following table shows our contractual obligations for the period indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period less than 1 year</td><td>payments due by period 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>8.75% ( 8.75 % ) senior notes</td><td>$ 200.0</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 200.0</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>5.40% ( 5.40 % ) senior notes</td><td>250.0</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>250.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>junior subordinated debt</td><td>329.9</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>329.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>6.6% ( 6.6 % ) long term notes</td><td>400.0</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>400.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>interest expense ( 1 )</td><td>2243.0</td><td>77.2</td><td>145.7</td><td>119.5</td><td>1900.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>employee benefit plans</td><td>2.4</td><td>2.4</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>operating lease agreements</td><td>32.0</td><td>8.5</td><td>16.3</td><td>3.7</td><td>3.5</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>gross reserve for losses and lae ( 2 )</td><td>9040.6</td><td>2053.2</td><td>3232.3</td><td>1077.1</td><td>2678.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 12497.9</td><td>$ 2141.3</td><td>$ 3594.3</td><td>$ 1200.3</td><td>$ 5562.0</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) interest expense on 6.6% ( 6.6 % ) long term notes is assumed to be fixed through contractual term . ( 2 ) loss and lae reserves represent our best estimate of losses from claim and related settlement costs . both the amounts and timing of such payments are estimates , and the inherent variability of resolving claims as well as changes in market conditions make the timing of cash flows uncertain . therefore , the ultimate amount and timing of loss and lae payments could differ from our estimates . the contractual obligations for senior notes , long term notes and junior subordinated debt are the responsibility of holdings . we have sufficient cash flow , liquidity , investments and access to capital markets to satisfy these obligations . holdings gen- erally depends upon dividends from everest re , its operating insurance subsidiary for its funding , capital contributions from group or access to the capital markets . our various operating insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have sufficient cash flow , liquidity and investments to settle outstanding reserves for losses and lae . management believes that we , and each of our entities , have sufficient financial resources or ready access thereto , to meet all obligations . dividends . during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , we declared and paid shareholder dividends of $ 121.4 million , $ 39.0 million and $ 25.4 million , respectively . as an insurance holding company , we are partially dependent on dividends and other permitted pay- ments from our subsidiaries to pay cash dividends to our shareholders . the payment of dividends to group by holdings and to holdings by everest re is subject to delaware regulatory restrictions and the payment of dividends to group by bermuda re is subject to bermuda insurance regulatory restrictions . management expects that , absent extraordinary catastrophe losses , such restrictions should not affect everest re 2019s ability to declare and pay dividends sufficient to support holdings 2019 general corporate needs and that holdings and bermuda re will have the ability to declare and pay dividends sufficient to support group 2019s general corporate needs . for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , everest re paid divi- dends to holdings of $ 245.0 million , $ 100.0 million and $ 75.0 million , respectively . for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , bermuda re paid dividends to group of $ 0.0 million , $ 60.0 million and $ 45.0 million , respectively . see item 1 , 201cbusiness 2013 regulatory matters 2013 dividends 201d and note 16 of notes to consolidated financial statements . application of new accounting standards . in november 2005 , the fasb issued fasb staff position ( 201cfsp 201d ) fas 115-1 , 201cthe meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to certain investments 201d ( 201cfas 115-1 201d ) , which is effective for reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2005 . fas 115-1 addresses the determination as to when an investment is considered impaired , whether the impairment is other than temporary and the measurement of an impairment loss . fas 115-1 also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain dis- closures about unrealized losses not recognized as other-than-temporary impairments . the company adopted fas 115-1 prospectively effective january 1 , 2006 . the company believes that all unrealized losses in its investment portfolio are temporary in nature. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in paid shareholder dividends between 2006 and 2007?\nAnswer: 82.4\nQuestion: and the specific value for 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "39.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10220	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( v ) bankruptcy , insolvency , or other similar proceedings , ( vi ) our inability to pay debts , ( vii ) judgment defaults of $ 15 million or more , ( viii ) customary erisa and environmental defaults , ( ix ) actual or asserted invalidity of any material provision of the loan documentation or impairment of a portion of the collateral , ( x ) failure of subordinated indebtedness to be validly and sufficiently subordinated , and ( xi ) a change of control . borrowings under the credit agreement accrue interest at variable rates , which depend on the type ( u.s . dollar or canadian dollar ) and duration of the borrowing , plus an applicable margin rate . the weighted-average interest rates , including the effect of interest rate swap agreements , on borrowings outstanding against our senior secured credit facility at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 were 3.97% ( 3.97 % ) and 4.53% ( 4.53 % ) , respectively . borrowings against the senior secured credit facility totaled $ 590.1 million and $ 595.7 million at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , of which $ 50.0 million and $ 7.5 million were classified as current maturities , respectively . we also incur commitment fees on the unused portion of our revolving credit facility ranging from 0.38% ( 0.38 % ) to 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) . as part of the consideration for business acquisitions completed during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , we issued promissory notes totaling approximately $ 5.5 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.6 million , respectively . the notes bear interest at annual rates of 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) to 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) , and interest is payable at maturity or in monthly installments . note 6 . derivative instruments and hedging activities we are exposed to market risks , including the effect of changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices . under our current policies , we use derivatives to manage our exposure to variable interest rates on our credit agreement , but we do not attempt to hedge our foreign currency and commodity price risks . we do not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes . at december 31 , 2010 , we had interest rate swap agreements in place to hedge a portion of the variable interest rate risk on our variable rate term loans , with the objective of minimizing the impact of interest rate fluctuations and stabilizing cash flows . beginning on the effective dates of the interest rate swap agreements , on a monthly basis through the maturity date , we have paid and will pay the fixed interest rate and have received and will receive payment at a variable rate of interest based on the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) on the notional amount . the interest rate swap agreements qualify as cash flow hedges , and we have elected to apply hedge accounting for these swap agreements . as a result , the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is recorded in other comprehensive income and is reclassified to interest expense when the underlying interest payment has an impact on earnings . the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is reported in interest expense . the following table summarizes the terms of our interest rate swap agreements as of december 31 , 2010: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>notional amount</td><td>effective date</td><td>maturity date</td><td>fixed interest rate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 200000000</td><td>april 14 2008</td><td>april 14 2011</td><td>4.99% ( 4.99 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 250000000</td><td>october 14 2010</td><td>october 14 2015</td><td>3.81% ( 3.81 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>$ 100000000</td><td>april 14 2011</td><td>october 14 2013</td><td>3.34% ( 3.34 % )</td></tr></table> includes applicable margin of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) per annum currently in effect under the credit agreement as of december 31 , 2010 , the fair market value of the $ 200 million notional amount swap was a liability of $ 1.4 million , included in other accrued expenses on our consolidated balance sheet . the fair market value of the other swap contracts was an asset of $ 4.8 million , included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2010 . as of december 31 , 2009 , the fair market value of the interest rate swap contracts was a liability of $ 10.2 million and was included in other accrued expenses ( $ 5.0 million ) and other noncurrent liabilities ( $ 5.2 million ) on our consolidated balance sheet. .\nQuestion: what is the sum, in millions, of promissory notes issued in 2009 and 2010?\nAnswer: 6.7\nQuestion: what is the total sum including 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.3" } ]
CONVFINQA7139	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n28 , 35 , or 90 days . the funds associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs or a buyer is found outside of the auction process . based on broker- dealer valuation models and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment factors , auction rate securities with an original par value of approximately $ 34 million were written-down to an estimated fair value of $ 16 million as of december 31 , 2007 . this write-down resulted in an 201cother-than-temporary 201d impairment charge of approximately $ 8 million ( pre-tax ) included in net income and a temporary impairment charge of $ 10 million ( pre-tax ) reflected as an unrealized loss within other comprehensive income for 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , these investments in auction rate securities have been in a loss position for less than six months . these auction rate securities are classified as non-current marketable securities as of december 31 , 2007 as indicated in the preceding table . 3m reviews impairments associated with the above in accordance with emerging issues task force ( eitf ) 03-1 and fsp sfas 115-1 and 124-1 , 201cthe meaning of other-than-temporary-impairment and its application to certain investments , 201d to determine the classification of the impairment as 201ctemporary 201d or 201cother-than-temporary . 201d a temporary impairment charge results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive income component of stockholders 2019 equity . such an unrealized loss does not reduce net income for the applicable accounting period because the loss is not viewed as other-than-temporary . the company believes that a portion of the impairment of its auction rate securities investments is temporary and a portion is other-than-temporary . the factors evaluated to differentiate between temporary and other-than-temporary include the projected future cash flows , credit ratings actions , and assessment of the credit quality of the underlying collateral . the balance at december 31 , 2007 for marketable securities and short-term investments by contractual maturity are shown below . actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties . dec . 31 , ( millions ) 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>dec . 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>due in one year or less</td><td>$ 231</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>due after one year through three years</td><td>545</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>due after three years through five years</td><td>221</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>due after five years</td><td>62</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total marketable securities</td><td>$ 1059</td></tr></table> predetermined intervals , usually every 7 .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2007, what was the impact of the adjustement on the auction rate securities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "18.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1638	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .\nQuestion: what were north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012?\nAnswer: 11.6\nQuestion: what were they in 2011?\nAnswer: 8.6\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 3.0\nQuestion: what was the 2011 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.6" } ]
CONVFINQA3783	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nn o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 : number of restricted stock weighted average grant- date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of restricted stock</td><td>weighted average grant- date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2005</td><td>3488668</td><td>$ 41.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1632504</td><td>$ 56.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1181249 ( 1181249 )</td><td>$ 40.20</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-360734 ( 360734 )</td><td>$ 44.04</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2006</td><td>3579189</td><td>$ 48.07</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1818716</td><td>$ 56.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1345412 ( 1345412 )</td><td>$ 44.48</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-230786 ( 230786 )</td><td>$ 51.57</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2007</td><td>3821707</td><td>$ 53.12</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>1836532</td><td>$ 59.84</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1403826 ( 1403826 )</td><td>$ 50.96</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-371183 ( 371183 )</td><td>$ 53.75</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2008</td><td>3883230</td><td>$ 57.01</td></tr></table> under the provisions of fas 123r , the recognition of deferred compensation , a contra-equity account representing the amount of unrecognized restricted stock expense that is reduced as expense is recognized , at the date restricted stock is granted is no longer permitted . therefore , upon adoption of fas 123r , the amount of deferred compensation that had been reflected in unearned stock grant compensation was reclassified to additional paid-in capital in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . restricted stock units the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of other awards , including restricted stock units . the company generally grants restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . each restricted stock unit repre- sents the company 2019s obligation to deliver to the holder one share of common shares upon vesting . during 2008 , the company awarded 223588 restricted stock units to officers of the company and its subsidiaries with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 59.93 . during 2007 , 108870 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.29 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . during 2006 , 83370 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.36 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . the company also grants restricted stock units with a 1-year vesting period to non-management directors . delivery of common shares on account of these restricted stock units to non-management directors is deferred until six months after the date of the non-management directors 2019 termination from the board . during 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , 40362 restricted stock units , 29676 restricted stock units , and 23092 restricted stock units , respectively , were awarded to non-management direc- the espp gives participating employees the right to purchase common shares through payroll deductions during consecutive 201csubscription periods . 201d annual purchases by participants are limited to the number of whole shares that can be purchased by an amount equal to ten percent of the participant 2019s compensation or $ 25000 , whichever is less . the espp has two six-month subscription periods , the first of which runs between january 1 and june 30 and the second of which runs between july 1 and december 31 of each year . the amounts that have been collected from participants during a subscription period are used on the 201cexercise date 201d to purchase full shares of common shares . an exercise date is generally the last trading day of a sub- scription period . the number of shares purchased is equal to the total amount , as of the exercise date , that has been collected from the participants through payroll deductions for that subscription period , divided by the 201cpurchase price 201d , rounded down to the next full share . effective for and from the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price is 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the exercise date . prior to the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price was calculated as the lower of ( i ) 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the first day of the subscription period , or .\nQuestion: what is the net impact of granted and vested shares in the number of unvested restricted stocks in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "473304.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7564	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2012 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 39 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest product principal interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interestonlyproduct</td><td>principalandinterestproduct</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 1338</td><td>$ 221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>2048</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>2024</td><td>654</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1571</td><td>504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>3075</td><td>697</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 and thereafter</td><td>5497</td><td>4825</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>$ 15553</td><td>$ 7376</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes approximately $ 166 million , $ 208 million , $ 213 million , $ 61 million , $ 70 million and $ 526 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2012 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.86% ( 3.86 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.96% ( 5.96 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 91 .\nQuestion: what is the sum of interest only product for 2013 and 2014?\nAnswer: 3386.0\nQuestion: what is the sum including 2015?\nAnswer: 5410.0\nQuestion: what is the sum divided by 3?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1803.33333" } ]
CONVFINQA4497	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nus in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2011 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 3.2 billion , including expenditures for positive train control ( ptc ) , which may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) 2022 positive train control 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 250 million during 2011 on developing ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the federal railroad administration ( fra ) . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . during 2011 , we plan to begin testing the technology to evaluate its effectiveness . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions , but anticipate volume to increase from 2010 levels . in addition , we expect volume , price , and productivity gains to offset expected higher costs for fuel , labor inflation , depreciation , casualty costs , and property taxes to drive operating ratio improvement . results of operations operating revenues millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 16069</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>896</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>16</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 16965</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups increased during 2010 as a result of economic improvement in many market sectors . we experienced particularly strong volume growth in automotive , intermodal , and industrial products shipments . core pricing gains and higher fuel surcharges also increased freight revenues and drove a 6% ( 6 % ) improvement in arc . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .\nQuestion: what was operating revenue in 2010?\nAnswer: 16965.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2009?\nAnswer: 14143.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 31108.0\nQuestion: what were operating revenues in 2008?\nAnswer: 17970.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "49078.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4948	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunconditional purchase obligations approximately $ 390 of our long-term unconditional purchase obligations relate to feedstock supply for numerous hyco ( hydrogen , carbon monoxide , and syngas ) facilities . the price of feedstock supply is principally related to the price of natural gas . however , long-term take-or-pay sales contracts to hyco customers are generally matched to the term of the feedstock supply obligations and provide recovery of price increases in the feedstock supply . due to the matching of most long-term feedstock supply obligations to customer sales contracts , we do not believe these purchase obligations would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations . refer to note 17 , commitments and contingencies , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on our unconditional purchase obligations . the unconditional purchase obligations also include other product supply and purchase commitments and electric power and natural gas supply purchase obligations , which are primarily pass-through contracts with our customers . in addition , purchase commitments to spend approximately $ 540 for additional plant and equipment are included in the unconditional purchase obligations in 2016 . we also purchase materials , energy , capital equipment , supplies , and services as part of the ordinary course of business under arrangements that are not unconditional purchase obligations . the majority of such purchases are for raw materials and energy , which are obtained under requirements-type contracts at market prices . obligation for future contribution to an equity affiliate on 19 april 2015 , a joint venture between air products and acwa holding entered into a 20-year oxygen and nitrogen supply agreement to supply saudi aramco 2019s oil refinery and power plant being built in jazan , saudi arabia . air products owns 25% ( 25 % ) of the joint venture and guarantees the repayment of its share of an equity bridge loan . in total , we expect to invest approximately $ 100 in this joint venture . as of 30 september 2015 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 67.5 for our obligation to make future equity contributions based on advances received by the joint venture under the loan . income tax liabilities noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities as of 30 september 2015 were $ 903.3 . tax liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits as of 30 september 2015 were $ 97.5 . these tax liabilities were excluded from the contractual obligations table , as it is impractical to determine a cash impact by year given that payments will vary according to changes in tax laws , tax rates , and our operating results . in addition , there are uncertainties in timing of the effective settlement of our uncertain tax positions with respective taxing authorities . refer to note 23 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . pension benefits the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans that cover a substantial portion of its worldwide employees . the principal defined benefit pension plans 2014the u.s . salaried pension plan and the u.k . pension plan 2014were closed to new participants in 2005 and were replaced with defined contribution plans . over the long run , the shift to defined contribution plans is expected to reduce volatility of both plan expense and contributions . the fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2015 measurement date decreased to $ 3916.4 from $ 4114.6 at the end of fiscal year 2014 . the projected benefit obligation for these plans was $ 4787.8 and $ 4738.6 at the end of the fiscal years 2015 and 2014 , respectively . refer to note 16 , retirement benefits , to the consolidated financial statements for comprehensive and detailed disclosures on our postretirement benefits . pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 135.9</td><td>$ 169.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above )</td><td>35.2</td><td>5.8</td><td>19.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td><td>4.6% ( 4.6 % )</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>7.4% ( 7.4 % )</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.9% ( 3.9 % )</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the fair market value of plan assets of the benefit pension plans in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3916.4" } ]
CONVFINQA10061	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2007 through october 28 , 2012 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2007 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * $ 100 invested on 10/28/07 in stock or 10/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/28/2007</td><td>10/26/2008</td><td>10/25/2009</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>61.22</td><td>71.06</td><td>69.23</td><td>72.37</td><td>62.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>63.90</td><td>70.17</td><td>81.76</td><td>88.37</td><td>101.81</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>54.74</td><td>68.59</td><td>84.46</td><td>91.33</td><td>82.37</td></tr></table> dividends during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.08 per share . during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.07 per share . during fiscal 2010 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.07 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.06 . dividends declared during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 amounted to $ 438 million , $ 408 million and $ 361 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/07 10/26/08 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .\nQuestion: what was the change in the value of s&p500 considering its price in 2010 and the original amount invested in it in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-18.24" } ]
CONVFINQA7606	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) stock options the 2003 plan allows us to grant options to all employees , including executive officers , outside consultants and non- employee directors . this plan will continue until the earlier of ( i ) termination by the board or ( ii ) the date on which all of the shares available for issuance under the plan have been issued and restrictions on issued shares have lapsed . option vesting periods used in the past were generally four years and expire seven years from the effective date of grant . we eliminated the use of stock option grants for all employees and non-employee directors but may choose to issue stock options in the future . performance share programs our 2018 , 2017 and 2016 performance share programs aim to help focus key employees on building stockholder value , provide significant award potential for achieving outstanding company performance and enhance the ability of the company to attract and retain highly talented and competent individuals . the executive compensation committee of our board of directors approves the terms of each of our performance share programs , including the award calculation methodology , under the terms of our 2003 plan . shares may be earned based on the achievement of an objective relative total stockholder return measured over a three-year performance period . performance share awards will be awarded and fully vest upon the later of the executive compensation committee's certification of the level of achievement or the three-year anniversary of each grant . program participants generally have the ability to receive up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares originally granted . on january 24 , 2018 , the executive compensation committee approved the 2018 performance share program , the terms of which are similar to prior year performance share programs as discussed above . as of november 30 , 2018 , the shares awarded under our 2018 , 2017 and 2016 performance share programs are yet to be achieved . issuance of shares upon exercise of stock options , vesting of restricted stock units and performance shares , and purchases of shares under the espp , we will issue treasury stock . if treasury stock is not available , common stock will be issued . in order to minimize the impact of on-going dilution from exercises of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units and performance shares , we instituted a stock repurchase program . see note 12 for information regarding our stock repurchase programs . valuation of stock-based compensation stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award . our performance share awards are valued using a monte carlo simulation model . the fair value of the awards are fixed at grant date and amortized over the longer of the remaining performance or service period . we use the black-scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of espp shares . the determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables . these variables include our expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the awards , actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors , a risk-free interest rate and any expected dividends . the expected term of espp shares is the average of the remaining purchase periods under each offering period . the assumptions used to value employee stock purchase rights were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>0.5 - 2.0</td><td>0.5 - 2.0</td><td>0.5 - 2.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility</td><td>26% ( 26 % ) - 29% ( 29 % )</td><td>22% ( 22 % ) - 27% ( 27 % )</td><td>26 - 29% ( 29 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk free interest rate</td><td>1.54% ( 1.54 % ) - 2.52% ( 2.52 % )</td><td>0.62% ( 0.62 % ) - 1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>0.37 - 1.06% ( 1.06 % )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the low bound for volatility in 2018?\nAnswer: 0.26\nQuestion: and the upper bound?\nAnswer: 0.29\nQuestion: so combined, what was this value?\nAnswer: 0.55\nQuestion: and the average volatility for this year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.275" } ]
CONVFINQA5600	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial conditionand results of operations d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 1 1 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t 2022 interest expense on the company 2019s secured debt decreased from $ 30.8 million in 2001 to $ 22.9 million in 2002 as the company paid off $ 13.5 million of secured debt throughout 2002 and experienced lower borrowings on its secured line of credit during 2002 compared to 2001 . additionally , the company paid off approximately $ 128.5 million of secured debt throughout 2001 . 2022 interest expense on the company 2019s $ 500 million unsecured line of credit decreased by approximately $ 1.1 million in 2002 compared to 2001 as the company maintained lower balances on the line throughout most of 2002 . as a result of the above-mentioned items , earnings from rental operations decreased $ 35.0 million from $ 254.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 219.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . service operations service operations primarily consist of leasing , management , construction and development services for joint venture properties and properties owned by third parties . service operations revenues decreased from $ 80.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 68.6 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . the prolonged effect of the slow economy has been the primary factor in the overall decrease in revenues . the company experienced a decrease of $ 12.7 million in net general contractor revenues because of a decrease in the volume of construction in 2002 , compared to 2001 , as well as slightly lower profit margins . property management , maintenance and leasing fee revenues decreased from $ 22.8 million in 2001 to $ 14.3 million in 2002 primarily because of a decrease in landscaping maintenance revenue resulting from the sale of the landscaping operations in the third quarter of 2001 . construction management and development activity income represents construction and development fees earned on projects where the company acts as the construction manager along with profits from the company 2019s held for sale program whereby the company develops a property for sale upon completion . the increase in revenues of $ 10.3 million in 2002 is primarily due to an increase in volume of the sale of properties from the held for sale program . service operations expenses decreased from $ 45.3 million in 2001 to $ 38.3 million in 2002 . the decrease is attributable to the decrease in construction and development activity and the reduced overhead costs as a result of the sale of the landscape business in 2001 . as a result of the above , earnings from service operations decreased from $ 35.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 30.3 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . general and administrative expense general and administrative expense increased from $ 15.6 million in 2001 to $ 25.4 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . the company has been successful reducing total operating and administration costs ; however , reduced construction and development activities have resulted in a greater amount of overhead being charged to general and administrative expense instead of being capitalized into development projects or charged to service operations . other income and expenses gain on sale of land and depreciable property dispositions , net of impairment adjustment , is comprised of the following amounts in 2002 and 2001 : gain on sales of depreciable properties represent sales of previously held for investment rental properties . beginning in 2000 and continuing into 2001 , the company pursued favorable opportunities to dispose of real estate assets that no longer met long-term investment objectives . in 2002 , the company significantly reduced this property sales program until the business climate improves and provides better investment opportunities for the sale proceeds . gain on land sales represents sales of undeveloped land owned by the company . the company pursues opportunities to dispose of land in markets with a high concentration of undeveloped land and those markets where the land no longer meets strategic development plans of the company . the company recorded a $ 9.4 million adjustment in 2002 associated with six properties determined to have an impairment of book value . the company has analyzed each of its in-service properties and has determined that there are no additional valuation adjustments that need to be made as of december 31 , 2002 . the company recorded an adjustment of $ 4.8 million in 2001 for one property that the company had contracted to sell for a price less than its book value . other revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2002 , includes $ 1.4 million of gain related to an interest rate swap that did not qualify for hedge accounting. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gain on sales of depreciable properties</td><td>$ 4491</td><td>$ 45428</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gain on land sales</td><td>4478</td><td>5080</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impairment adjustment</td><td>-9379 ( 9379 )</td><td>-4800 ( 4800 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ -410 ( 410 )</td><td>$ 45708</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of general and administrative expenses from 2001 to 2002?\nAnswer: 9.8\nQuestion: what is that change over the 2001 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.62821" } ]
CONVFINQA5516	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncertain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 3338</td><td>$ 4273</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principalbalance</td><td>55</td><td>138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>4</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrualloans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr></table> the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $ 10 million loss and $ 32 million loss , respectively . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 6.5 billion and $ 5.7 billion as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 125 million and $ 671 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . the company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . for those non-structured liabilities classified as short-term borrowings for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 220 million as of december 31 , 2008 . for non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 1542 million and $ 856 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value: .\nQuestion: what was the aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance for the loans accounted for with the fair value option in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "55.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7285	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2018 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2013 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td><td>12/31/2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hum</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 176</td><td>$ 202</td><td>$ 247</td><td>$ 287</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 114</td><td>$ 115</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 150</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 173</td><td>$ 191</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .\nQuestion: what was the highest change in the performance price for the first year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "40.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4371	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance of the company 2019s obligations under the senior notes , including any repurchase obligations resulting from a change of control , is unconditionally guaranteed , jointly and severally , on an unsecured basis , by each of hii 2019s existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries that guarantees debt under the credit facility ( the 201csubsidiary guarantors 201d ) . the guarantees rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the guarantors . the subsidiary guarantors are each directly or indirectly 100% ( 100 % ) owned by hii . there are no significant restrictions on the ability of hii or any subsidiary guarantor to obtain funds from their respective subsidiaries by dividend or loan . mississippi economic development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 83.7 million outstanding from the issuance of industrial revenue bonds issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . these bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 7.81% ( 7.81 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) and mature in 2024 . while repayment of principal and interest is guaranteed by northrop grumman systems corporation , hii has agreed to indemnify northrop grumman systems corporation for any losses related to the guaranty . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 21.6 million outstanding from the issuance of gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds ( 201cgo zone irbs 201d ) issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . the go zone irbs were initially issued in a principal amount of $ 200 million , and in november 2010 , in connection with the anticipated spin-off , hii purchased $ 178 million of the bonds using the proceeds from a $ 178 million intercompany loan from northrop grumman . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity . the remaining bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 4.55% ( 4.55 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) , and mature in 2028 . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . the estimated fair value of the company 2019s total long-term debt , including current portions , at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was $ 1864 million and $ 128 million , respectively . the fair value of the total long-term debt was calculated based on recent trades for most of the company 2019s debt instruments or based on interest rates prevailing on debt with substantially similar risks , terms and maturities . the aggregate amounts of principal payments due on long-term debt for each of the next five years and thereafter are : ( $ in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 29</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>288</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1305</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>$ 1859</td></tr></table> 14 . investigations , claims , and litigation the company is involved in legal proceedings before various courts and administrative agencies , and is periodically subject to government examinations , inquiries and investigations . pursuant to fasb accounting standard codification 450 contingencies , the company has accrued for losses associated with investigations , claims and litigation when , and to the extent that , loss amounts related to the investigations , claims and litigation are probable and can be reasonably estimated . the actual losses that might be incurred to resolve such investigations , claims and litigation may be higher or lower than the amounts accrued . for matters where a material loss is probable or reasonably possible and the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated , but the company is able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses , such estimated range is required to be disclosed in these notes . this estimated range would be based on information currently available to the company and would involve elements of judgment and significant uncertainties . this estimated range of possible loss would not represent the company 2019s maximum possible loss exposure . for matters as to which the company is not able to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of loss , the company is required to indicate the reasons why it is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss . for matters not specifically described in these notes , the company does not believe , based on information currently available to it , that it is reasonably possible that the liabilities , if any , arising from .\nQuestion: what is the value of the long-term debt due after 2016?\nAnswer: 1305.0\nQuestion: and what is the total long-term debt?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1859.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3928	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2015 and 2014 was $ 1.5 billion and $ 1.3 billion . the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding foreign currency hedges at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 4.1 billion and $ 804 million . derivative instruments did not have a material impact on net earnings and comprehensive income during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . substantially all of our derivatives are designated for hedge accounting . see note 16 for more information on the fair value measurements related to our derivative instruments . recent accounting pronouncements 2013 in may 2014 , the fasb issued a new standard that will change the way we recognize revenue and significantly expand the disclosure requirements for revenue arrangements . on july 9 , 2015 , the fasb approved a one-year deferral of the effective date of the standard to 2018 for public companies , with an option that would permit companies to adopt the standard in 2017 . early adoption prior to 2017 is not permitted . the new standard may be adopted either retrospectively or on a modified retrospective basis whereby the new standard would be applied to new contracts and existing contracts with remaining performance obligations as of the effective date , with a cumulative catch-up adjustment recorded to beginning retained earnings at the effective date for existing contracts with remaining performance obligations . in addition , the fasb is contemplating making additional changes to certain elements of the new standard . we are currently evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by the new standard and the effect the standard is expected to have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures . as the new standard will supersede substantially all existing revenue guidance affecting us under gaap , it could impact revenue and cost recognition on thousands of contracts across all our business segments , in addition to our business processes and our information technology systems . as a result , our evaluation of the effect of the new standard will extend over future periods . in september 2015 , the fasb issued a new standard that simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to preliminary amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments . instead , adjustments will be recognized in the period in which the adjustments are determined , including the effect on earnings of any amounts that would have been recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date . we adopted the standard on january 1 , 2016 and will prospectively apply the standard to business combination adjustments identified after the date of adoption . in november 2015 , the fasb issued a new standard that simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities , as well as any related valuation allowance , be classified as noncurrent in our consolidated balance sheets . the standard is effective january 1 , 2017 , with early adoption permitted . the standard may be applied either prospectively from the date of adoption or retrospectively to all prior periods presented . we are currently evaluating when we will adopt the standard and the method of adoption . note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>310.3</td><td>316.8</td><td>320.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>4.4</td><td>5.6</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations</td><td>314.7</td><td>322.4</td><td>326.5</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 2.4 million stock options for the year ended december 31 , 2013 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market prices of our common stock during the respective periods . there were no anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014. .\nQuestion: by how much did the weighted average common shares outstanding change for diluted computations between 2013 and 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-4.1" } ]
CONVFINQA4699	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .\nQuestion: what is the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11600.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4511	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvaluation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized as level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee typically obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . in addition , certain other fixed income investments categorized as level 3 are valued using a discounted cash flow approach . significant inputs include projected annuity payments and the discount rate applied to those payments . certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav . the nav valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the nav is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the nav is based on valuation models and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds for which the nav is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions . as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>2024 2013 2028</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 2350</td><td>$ 2390</td><td>$ 2470</td><td>$ 2550</td><td>$ 2610</td><td>$ 13670</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>170</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>170</td><td>810</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 33.3 million and 35.5 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017. .\nQuestion: what were the employee matching contributions in 2018?\nAnswer: 658.0\nQuestion: and what were they in 2017?\nAnswer: 613.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "45.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3857	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company granted 1020 performance shares . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2009</td><td>116677</td><td>$ 280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>134245</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-34630 ( 34630 )</td><td>257</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-19830 ( 19830 )</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2010</td><td>196462</td><td>283</td></tr></table> the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what is that total fair value of restricted stock that vested during 2010?\nAnswer: 10.3\nQuestion: what about during 2009?\nAnswer: 6.2\nQuestion: what is the total for two years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "16.5" } ]
CONVFINQA10773	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2015 , continued management actions , primarily the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of approximately $ 1.5 billion of delinquent residential first mortgages , including $ 0.9 billion in the fourth quarter largely associated with the transfer of citifinancial loans to held-for-sale referenced above , were the primary driver of the overall improvement in delinquencies within citi holdings 2019 residential first mortgage portfolio . credit performance from quarter to quarter could continue to be impacted by the amount of delinquent loan sales or transfers to held-for-sale , as well as overall trends in hpi and interest rates . north america residential first mortgages 2014state delinquency trends the following tables set forth the six u.s . states and/or regions with the highest concentration of citi 2019s residential first mortgages. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars state ( 1 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>in billions of dollars %ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>in billions of dollars refreshedfico</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>%ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>refreshedfico</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ca</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>37% ( 37 % )</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>754</td><td>$ 18.9</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>0.6% ( 0.6 % )</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td><td>745</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>ny/nj/ct ( 4 )</td><td>12.7</td><td>25</td><td>0.8</td><td>1</td><td>751</td><td>12.2</td><td>20</td><td>1.9</td><td>2</td><td>740</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>va/md</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.2</td><td>2</td><td>719</td><td>3.0</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>8</td><td>695</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>il ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>3</td><td>735</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.5</td><td>9</td><td>713</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fl ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.1</td><td>4</td><td>723</td><td>2.8</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>14</td><td>700</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tx</td><td>1.9</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>2014</td><td>711</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.7</td><td>2014</td><td>680</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>11.0</td><td>21</td><td>1.3</td><td>2</td><td>710</td><td>18.2</td><td>30</td><td>3.3</td><td>7</td><td>677</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total ( 5 )</td><td>$ 51.5</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>738</td><td>$ 60.1</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td><td>715</td></tr></table> total ( 5 ) $ 51.5 100% ( 100 % ) 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) 1% ( 1 % ) 738 $ 60.1 100% ( 100 % ) 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) 4% ( 4 % ) 715 note : totals may not sum due to rounding . ( 1 ) certain of the states are included as part of a region based on citi 2019s view of similar hpi within the region . ( 2 ) ending net receivables . excludes loans in canada and puerto rico , loans guaranteed by u.s . government agencies , loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to long term standby commitments ( ltscs ) . excludes balances for which fico or ltv data are unavailable . ( 3 ) ltv ratios ( loan balance divided by appraised value ) are calculated at origination and updated by applying market price data . ( 4 ) new york , new jersey , connecticut , florida and illinois are judicial states . ( 5 ) improvement in state trends during 2015 was primarily due to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of residential first mortgages , including the transfer of citifinancial residential first mortgages to held-for-sale in the fourth quarter of 2015 . foreclosures a substantial majority of citi 2019s foreclosure inventory consists of residential first mortgages . at december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s foreclosure inventory included approximately $ 0.1 billion , or 0.2% ( 0.2 % ) , of the total residential first mortgage portfolio , compared to $ 0.6 billion , or 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) , at december 31 , 2014 , based on the dollar amount of ending net receivables of loans in foreclosure inventory , excluding loans that are guaranteed by u.s . government agencies and loans subject to ltscs . north america consumer mortgage quarterly credit trends 2014net credit losses and delinquencies 2014home equity citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio consists of both fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit . fixed-rate home equity loans are fully amortizing . home equity lines of credit allow for amounts to be drawn for a period of time with the payment of interest only and then , at the end of the draw period , the then-outstanding amount is converted to an amortizing loan ( the interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for this product across the industry ) . after conversion , the home equity loans typically have a 20-year amortization period . as of december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio of $ 22.8 billion consisted of $ 6.3 billion of fixed-rate home equity loans and $ 16.5 billion of loans extended under home equity lines of credit ( revolving helocs ) . .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2015, what was the amount of the loans extended under home equity lines of credit?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "16.5" } ]
CONVFINQA4653	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s . dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>october 30 2010</td><td>october 31 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value of forward exchange contracts asset</td><td>$ 7256</td><td>$ 8367</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset</td><td>$ 22062</td><td>$ 20132</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability</td><td>$ -7396 ( 7396 )</td><td>$ -6781 ( 6781 )</td></tr></table> fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22062 $ 20132 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 7396 ) $ ( 6781 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s . dollar . in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive . our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .\nQuestion: what was the fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22062.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9400	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( f ) this sale-leaseback financing arrangement relates to a lease of a slab caster at united states steel 2019s fairfield works facility in alabama . we are the primary obligor under this lease . under the financial matters agreement , united states steel has assumed responsibility for all obligations under this lease . this lease is an amortizing financing with a final maturity of 2012 , subject to additional extensions . ( g ) this obligation relates to a lease of equipment at united states steel 2019s clairton works cokemaking facility in pennsylvania . we are the primary obligor under this lease . under the financial matters agreement , united states steel has assumed responsibility for all obligations under this lease . this lease is an amortizing financing with a final maturity of 2012 . ( h ) marathon oil canada corporation had an 805 million canadian dollar revolving term credit facility which was secured by substantially all of marathon oil canada corporation 2019s assets and included certain financial covenants , including leverage and interest coverage ratios . in february 2008 , the outstanding balance was repaid and the facility was terminated . ( i ) these notes are senior secured notes of marathon oil canada corporation . the notes were secured by substantially all of marathon oil canada corporation 2019s assets . in january 2008 , we provided a full and unconditional guarantee covering the payment of all principal and interest due under the senior notes . ( j ) these obligations as of december 31 , 2008 include $ 126 million related to assets under construction at that date for which capital leases or sale-leaseback financings will commence upon completion of construction . the amounts currently reported are based upon the percent of construction completed as of december 31 , 2008 and therefore do not reflect future minimum lease obligations of $ 209 million . ( k ) payments of long-term debt for the years 2009 2013 2013 are $ 99 million , $ 98 million , $ 257 million , $ 1487 million and $ 279 million . of these amounts , payments assumed by united states steel are $ 15 million , $ 17 million , $ 161 million , $ 19 million and zero . ( l ) in the event of a change in control , as defined in the related agreements , debt obligations totaling $ 669 million at december 31 , 2008 , may be declared immediately due and payable . ( m ) see note 17 for information on interest rate swaps . on february 17 , 2009 , we issued $ 700 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes bearing interest at 6.5 percent with a maturity date of february 15 , 2014 and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes bearing interest at 7.5 percent with a maturity date of february 15 , 2019 . interest on both issues is payable semi- annually beginning august 15 , 2009 . 21 . asset retirement obligations the following summarizes the changes in asset retirement obligations : ( in millions ) 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset retirement obligations as of january 1</td><td>$ 1134</td><td>$ 1044</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred including acquisitions</td><td>30</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion expense ( included in depreciation depletion and amortization )</td><td>66</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions to previous estimates</td><td>24</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>held for sale ( a )</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deconsolidation of egholdings</td><td>2013</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>asset retirement obligations as of december 31 ( b )</td><td>$ 965</td><td>$ 1134</td></tr></table> asset retirement obligations as of december 31 ( b ) $ 965 $ 1134 ( a ) see note 7 for information related to our assets held for sale . ( b ) includes asset retirement obligation of $ 2 and $ 3 million classified as short-term at december 31 , 2008 , and 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the value of the asset retirement obligations at the end of 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1134.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7193	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis the risk committee of the board and the risk governance committee ( through delegated authority from the firmwide risk committee ) approve market risk limits and sub-limits at firmwide , business and product levels , consistent with our risk appetite statement . in addition , market risk management ( through delegated authority from the risk governance committee ) sets market risk limits and sub-limits at certain product and desk levels . the purpose of the firmwide limits is to assist senior management in controlling our overall risk profile . sub-limits are set below the approved level of risk limits . sub-limits set the desired maximum amount of exposure that may be managed by any particular business on a day-to-day basis without additional levels of senior management approval , effectively leaving day-to-day decisions to individual desk managers and traders . accordingly , sub-limits are a management tool designed to ensure appropriate escalation rather than to establish maximum risk tolerance . sub-limits also distribute risk among various businesses in a manner that is consistent with their level of activity and client demand , taking into account the relative performance of each area . our market risk limits are monitored daily by market risk management , which is responsible for identifying and escalating , on a timely basis , instances where limits have been exceeded . when a risk limit has been exceeded ( e.g. , due to positional changes or changes in market conditions , such as increased volatilities or changes in correlations ) , it is escalated to senior managers in market risk management and/or the appropriate risk committee . such instances are remediated by an inventory reduction and/or a temporary or permanent increase to the risk limit . model review and validation our var and stress testing models are regularly reviewed by market risk management and enhanced in order to incorporate changes in the composition of positions included in our market risk measures , as well as variations in market conditions . prior to implementing significant changes to our assumptions and/or models , model risk management performs model validations . significant changes to our var and stress testing models are reviewed with our chief risk officer and chief financial officer , and approved by the firmwide risk committee . see 201cmodel risk management 201d for further information about the review and validation of these models . systems we have made a significant investment in technology to monitor market risk including : 2030 an independent calculation of var and stress measures ; 2030 risk measures calculated at individual position levels ; 2030 attribution of risk measures to individual risk factors of each position ; 2030 the ability to report many different views of the risk measures ( e.g. , by desk , business , product type or entity ) ; 2030 the ability to produce ad hoc analyses in a timely manner . metrics we analyze var at the firmwide level and a variety of more detailed levels , including by risk category , business , and region . the tables below present average daily var and period-end var , as well as the high and low var for the period . diversification effect in the tables below represents the difference between total var and the sum of the vars for the four risk categories . this effect arises because the four market risk categories are not perfectly correlated . the table below presents average daily var by risk category. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2017</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates</td><td>$ 40</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity prices</td><td>24</td><td>25</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currency rates</td><td>12</td><td>21</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodity prices</td><td>13</td><td>17</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>diversification effect</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-45 ( 45 )</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 76</td></tr></table> our average daily var decreased to $ 54 million in 2017 from $ 63 million in 2016 , due to reductions across all risk categories , partially offset by a decrease in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was primarily due to lower levels of volatility . our average daily var decreased to $ 63 million in 2016 from $ 76 million in 2015 , due to reductions across all risk categories , partially offset by a decrease in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was primarily due to reduced exposures . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 91 .\nQuestion: what was the average daily var in the currency rates risk category in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5389	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements operating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 minimum rental ( a ) $ 245 $ 209 $ 172 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>minimum rental ( a )</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 209</td><td>$ 172</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contingent rental</td><td>22</td><td>33</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sublease rentals</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net rental expense</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 242</td><td>$ 193</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 5 million , $ 8 million and $ 9 million paid by united states steel in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 on assumed leases . 27 . contingencies and commitments we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment . certain of these matters are discussed below . the ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements . however , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably . environmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment . these laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites . penalties may be imposed for noncompliance . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 111 million and $ 108 million . it is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed . receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 60 and $ 66 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 20 cases arising in three states alleging damages for methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) contamination . we have also received seven toxic substances control act notice letters involving potential claims in two states . such notice letters are often followed by litigation . like the cases that were settled in 2008 , the remaining mtbe cases are consolidated in a multidistrict litigation in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings . nineteen of the remaining cases allege damages to water supply wells , similar to the damages claimed in the settled cases . in the other remaining case , the state of new jersey is seeking natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe . this is the only mtbe contamination case in which we are a defendant and natural resources damages are sought . we are vigorously defending these cases . we , along with a number of other defendants , have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of the cases in which we are a defendant . we do not expect our share of liability , if any , for the remaining cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . a lawsuit filed in the united states district court for the southern district of west virginia alleges that our catlettsburg , kentucky , refinery distributed contaminated gasoline to wholesalers and retailers for a period prior to august , 2003 , causing permanent damage to storage tanks , dispensers and related equipment , resulting in lost profits , business disruption and personal and real property damages . following the incident , we conducted remediation operations at affected facilities , and we deny that any permanent damages resulted from the incident . class action certification was granted in august 2007 . we have entered into a tentative settlement agreement in this case . notice of the proposed settlement has been sent to the class members . approval by the court after a fairness hearing is required before the settlement can be finalized . the fairness hearing is scheduled in the first quarter of 2009 . the proposed settlement will not significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . guarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies . under the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements . in addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .\nQuestion: what was the minimal rental value in 2008?\nAnswer: 245.0\nQuestion: what was the minimal rental value in 2006?\nAnswer: 172.0\nQuestion: what was the change in value?\nAnswer: 73.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.42442" } ]
CONVFINQA9145	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 9 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2009 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 55178</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>45275</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>36841</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>30789</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>22094</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>59263</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 249440</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 57.2 million , $ 49.0 million and $ 26.6 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2009 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 27.8 million . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the united states of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a united states design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . note 10 . business combinations on october 1 , 2009 , we acquired greenleaf auto recyclers , llc ( 201cgreenleaf 201d ) from ssi for $ 38.8 million , net of cash acquired . greenleaf is the entity through which ssi operated its late model automotive parts recycling business . we recorded a gain on bargain purchase for the greenleaf acquisition totaling $ 4.3 million , which is .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of rental expense for operating leases from 2007 to 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22.4" } ]
CONVFINQA398	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1509.7</td><td>$ 1667.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 150.1</td><td>$ 107.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1610.3</td><td>1612.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1762.3</td><td>$ 1722.2</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. .\nQuestion: what was the long-term debt in 2015?\nAnswer: 1610.3\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\nAnswer: 1612.9\nQuestion: what was, then, the total long-term debt for those two years combined?\nAnswer: 3223.2\nQuestion: and what was the total debt in that same period?\nAnswer: 3484.5\nQuestion: how much, then, does the long-term debt represent in relation to this total debt, in the two year period?\nAnswer: 0.92501\nQuestion: and how much is that in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "92.50108" } ]
CONVFINQA9319	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portu- guese and latin american markets and although pullmantur has diversified its passenger sourcing over the past few years , spain still represents pullmantur 2019s largest market . as previously disclosed , during 2012 european economies continued to demonstrate insta- bility in light of heightened concerns over sovereign debt issues as well as the impact of proposed auster- ity measures on certain markets . the spanish econ- omy was more severely impacted than many other economies and there is significant uncertainty as to when it will recover . in addition , the impact of the costa concordia incident has had a more lingering effect than expected and the impact in future years is uncertain . these factors were identified in the past as significant risks which could lead to the impairment of pullmantur 2019s goodwill . more recently , the spanish economy has progressively worsened and forecasts suggest the challenging operating environment will continue for an extended period of time . the unemployment rate in spain reached 26% ( 26 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is expected to rise further in 2013 . the international monetary fund , which had projected gdp growth of 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) a year ago , revised its 2013 gdp projections downward for spain to a contraction of 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and further reduced it to a contraction of 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) in january of 2013 . during the latter half of 2012 new austerity measures , such as increases to the value added tax , cuts to benefits , the phasing out of exemptions and the suspension of government bonuses , were implemented by the spanish government . we believe these austerity measures are having a larger impact on consumer confidence and discretionary spending than previously anticipated . as a result , there has been a significant deterioration in bookings from guests sourced from spain during the 2013 wave season . the combination of all of these factors has caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the expectations regarding future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined the implied fair value of goodwill for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 million and rec- ognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . there have been no goodwill impairment charges related to the pullmantur reporting unit in prior periods . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) perform worse than contemplated in our discounted cash flow model , or if there are material changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impair- ment analyses , especially in net yields , an additional impairment charge of the pullmantur reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 218883</td><td>$ 225679</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>impairment charge</td><td>-17356 ( 17356 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>3339</td><td>-6796 ( 6796 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 204866</td><td>$ 218883</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of our trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . these trademarks and trade names relate to pullmantur and we have used a discount rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . as described in note 3 . goodwill , the continued deterioration of the spanish economy caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections for the pullmantur reporting unit , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the timing of future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined that the fair value of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names no longer exceeded their carrying value . accordingly , we recog- nized an impairment charge of approximately $ 17.4 million to write down trademarks and trade names to their fair value of $ 204.9 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) 0494.indd 76 3/27/13 12:53 pm .\nQuestion: what is net change in total value of intangible assets from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: -14017.0\nQuestion: what is the total value of intangible assets in 2011?\nAnswer: 218883.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.06404" } ]
CONVFINQA10565	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of current assets from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: 74.2\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of that total in 2006?\nAnswer: 0.06665\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the change in the total of current liabilities?\nAnswer: -42.8\nQuestion: what was this total in 2006?\nAnswer: 682.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, did that change represent in relation to this 2006 amount?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.06276" } ]
CONVFINQA1937	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if sustaining those positions is more likely than not . changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which a change in judgment occurs . the company records penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in income taxes in the company 2019s consolidated statements of income . changes in accounting principles business combinations and noncontrolling interests on january 1 , 2009 , the company adopted revised principles related to business combinations and noncontrolling interests . the revised principle on business combinations applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control over one or more businesses . it requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired , the liabilities assumed , and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date , measured at their fair values as of that date . business combinations achieved in stages require recognition of the identifiable assets and liabilities , as well as the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree , at the full amounts of their fair values when control is obtained . this revision also changes the requirements for recognizing assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies , and requires direct acquisition costs to be expensed . in addition , it provides certain changes to income tax accounting for business combinations which apply to both new and previously existing business combinations . in april 2009 , additional guidance was issued which revised certain business combination guidance related to accounting for contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination . the company has adopted this guidance in conjunction with the adoption of the revised principles related to business combinations . the adoption of the revised principles related to business combinations has not had a material impact on the consolidated financial statements . the revised principle related to noncontrolling interests establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . the revised principle clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as a separate component of equity in the consolidated statements of financial position . the revised principle requires retrospective adjustments , for all periods presented , of stockholders 2019 equity and net income for noncontrolling interests . in addition to these financial reporting changes , the revised principle provides for significant changes in accounting related to changes in ownership of noncontrolling interests . changes in aon 2019s controlling financial interests in consolidated subsidiaries that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions similar to treasury stock transactions . if a change in ownership of a consolidated subsidiary results in a loss of control and deconsolidation , any retained ownership interests are remeasured at fair value with the gain or loss reported in net income . in previous periods , noncontrolling interests for operating subsidiaries were reported in other general expenses in the consolidated statements of income . prior period amounts have been restated to conform to the current year 2019s presentation . the principal effect on the prior years 2019 balance sheets related to the adoption of the new guidance related to noncontrolling interests is summarized as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity as previously reported</td><td>$ 5310</td><td>$ 6221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase for reclassification of non-controlling interests</td><td>105</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>equity as adjusted</td><td>$ 5415</td><td>$ 6261</td></tr></table> the revised principle also requires that net income be adjusted to include the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests and a new separate caption for net income attributable to aon stockholders be presented in the consolidated statements of income . the adoption of this new guidance increased net income by $ 16 million and $ 13 million for 2008 and 2007 , respectively . net .\nQuestion: what was the reclassification of non-controlling interests in 2008?\nAnswer: 105.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2007?\nAnswer: 40.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "65.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4982	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as an indicator of the impact of price on the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads by quarter for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets in 2008 . crack spreads ( dollars per barrel ) 1st qtr 2nd qtr 3rd qtr 4th qtr 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>crack spreads ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>1st qtr</td><td>2nd qtr</td><td>3rd qtr</td><td>4th qtr</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 0.07</td><td>$ 2.71</td><td>$ 7.81</td><td>$ 2.31</td><td>$ 3.27</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>us gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 1.39</td><td>$ 1.99</td><td>$ 6.32</td><td>( $ 0.01 )</td><td>$ 2.45</td></tr></table> in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , the selling prices realized for refined products , the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to mitigate price risk and the cost of purchased products for resale . we process significant amounts of sour crude oil which can enhance our profitability compared to certain of our competitors , as sour crude oil typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . finally , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by changes in manufacturing costs , which are primarily driven by the level of maintenance activities at the refineries and the price of purchased natural gas used for plant fuel . our 2008 refining and wholesale marketing gross margin was the key driver of the 43 percent decrease in rm&t segment income when compared to 2007 . our average refining and wholesale marketing gross margin per gallon decreased 37 percent , to 11.66 cents in 2008 from 18.48 cents in 2007 , primarily due to the significant and rapid increases in crude oil prices early in 2008 and lagging wholesale price realizations . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . while on average demand has been increasing for several years , there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . in 2008 , demand began to drop due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices and a broad slowdown in general activity . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has historically been more constant . the profitability of our pipeline transportation operations is primarily dependent on the volumes shipped through our crude oil and refined products pipelines . the volume of crude oil that we transport is directly affected by the supply of , and refiner demand for , crude oil in the markets served directly by our crude oil pipelines . key factors in this supply and demand balance are the production levels of crude oil by producers , the availability and cost of alternative modes of transportation , and refinery and transportation system maintenance levels . the volume of refined products that we transport is directly affected by the production levels of , and user demand for , refined products in the markets served by our refined product pipelines . in most of our markets , demand for gasoline peaks during the summer and declines during the fall and winter months , whereas distillate demand is more ratable throughout the year . as with crude oil , other transportation alternatives and system maintenance levels influence refined product movements . integrated gas our integrated gas strategy is to link stranded natural gas resources with areas where a supply gap is emerging due to declining production and growing demand . our integrated gas operations include marketing and transportation of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , primarily in the u.s. , europe and west africa . our most significant lng investment is our 60 percent ownership in a production facility in equatorial guinea , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . in 2008 , its .\nQuestion: what was the total combined crack spread for us gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1 in the first and second quarter of 2008?\nAnswer: 3.38\nQuestion: so what was the average over this time?\nAnswer: 1.69\nQuestion: was the average yearly crack spread for chicago lls 6-3-2-1 greater than the spread for us gul coast lls 6-3-2-1 in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "yes" } ]
CONVFINQA6127	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\neog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities . the following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to eog's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved properties</td><td>$ 53624809</td><td>$ 48845672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>unproved properties</td><td>3705207</td><td>3710069</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>57330016</td><td>52555741</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>-31674085 ( 31674085 )</td><td>-29191247 ( 29191247 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net capitalized costs</td><td>$ 25655931</td><td>$ 23364494</td></tr></table> costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition , exploration and development activities . the acquisition , exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the extractive industries - oil and gas topic of the accounting standards codification ( asc ) . acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase , lease or otherwise acquire property . exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells , including those in progress , and exploration expenses . development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells , including those in progress. .\nQuestion: what were net capitalized costs in 2018?\nAnswer: 25655931.0\nQuestion: what were net capitalized costs in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "23364494.0" } ]
CONVFINQA315	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents ( 2 ) includes capitalized lease obligations of $ 3.2 million and $ 0.1 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income before interest expense , income tax expense , depreciation and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , means ebitda adjusted for certain items which are described in the table below . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda is also the primary measure used in certain key covenants and definitions contained in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , including the excess cash flow payment provision , the restricted payment covenant and the net leverage ratio . these covenants and definitions are material components of the term loan as they are used in determining the interest rate applicable to the term loan , our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>227.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>208.2</td><td>210.2</td><td>204.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>243.9</td><td>142.8</td><td>62.7</td><td>67.1</td><td>11.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>159.5</td><td>197.3</td><td>250.1</td><td>307.4</td><td>324.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ebitda</td><td>1033.9</td><td>792.9</td><td>653.8</td><td>703.7</td><td>557.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b )</td><td>10.1</td><td>-2.2 ( 2.2 )</td><td>-0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>6.9</td><td>9.2</td><td>82.7</td><td>23.9</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>adjusted ebitda ( f )</td><td>$ 1018.5</td><td>$ 907.0</td><td>$ 808.5</td><td>$ 766.6</td><td>$ 717.3</td></tr></table> net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a ) 24.3 90.7 64.0 17.2 118.9 loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b ) 10.1 ( 2.2 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.1 ) acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 6.9 9.2 82.7 23.9 21.6 adjusted ebitda ( f ) $ 1018.5 $ 907.0 $ 808.5 $ 766.6 $ 717.3 ( a ) during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded net losses on extinguishments of long-term debt . the losses represented the difference between the amount paid upon extinguishment , including call premiums and expenses paid to the debt holders and agents , and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt , adjusted for a portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs . ( b ) represents our share of net income/loss from our equity investments . our 35% ( 35 % ) share of kelway 2019s net loss includes our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to the acquisition . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway. .\nQuestion: what was the adjusted ebitda in 2015?\nAnswer: 111.5\nQuestion: and unadjusted ebitda during that time?\nAnswer: 1033.9\nQuestion: and in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "792.9" } ]
CONVFINQA6169	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfuture minimum lease commitments for office premises and equipment under non-cancelable leases , along with minimum sublease rental income to be received under non-cancelable subleases , are as follows : period rent obligations sublease rental income net rent . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>rent obligations</td><td>sublease rental income</td><td>net rent</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 323.9</td><td>$ -40.9 ( 40.9 )</td><td>$ 283.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>300.9</td><td>-37.5 ( 37.5 )</td><td>263.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>267.7</td><td>-31.0 ( 31.0 )</td><td>236.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>233.7</td><td>-25.7 ( 25.7 )</td><td>208.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>197.9</td><td>-20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>177.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2013 and thereafter</td><td>871.0</td><td>-33.1 ( 33.1 )</td><td>837.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2195.1</td><td>$ -188.4 ( 188.4 )</td><td>$ 2006.7</td></tr></table> guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases . the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 327.1 and $ 327.9 as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . in addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries . the amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors . we have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable . when the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity . however , we recognize deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase that are contingent upon the future employment of owners as compensation expense . compensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses . this future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners . the following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid under the options , in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) .\nQuestion: in 2008, what amount from the rent obligations will be paid-off through sublease rental income?\nAnswer: 40.9\nQuestion: and what is the total of those rent obligations?\nAnswer: 323.9\nQuestion: what portion, then, of this total does that amount represent?\nAnswer: 0.12627\nQuestion: and considering the values for all years, what becomes this ratio, or portion?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.08583" } ]
CONVFINQA3603	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nireland . holdings ireland , everest dublin holdings , ireland re and ireland insurance conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . aavailable information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public and private debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of reinsurance , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 1800.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>1472.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>301.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>53.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2014</td><td>56.3</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .\nQuestion: what is the value of pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2018?\nAnswer: 1800.2\nQuestion: what is the value in 2017?\nAnswer: 1472.6\nQuestion: what was the net change?\nAnswer: 327.6\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.22246" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.