Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA8477	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe total intrinsic value of options exercised ( i.e . the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid by the employee to exercise the options ) during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 96.5 million , $ 29.6 million and $ 4.7 million , respectively . the total amount of proceeds received by the company from exercise of these options during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 217.4 million , $ 240.4 million and $ 15.1 million , respectively . proceeds from stock option exercises pursuant to employee stock plans in the company 2019s statement of cash flows of $ 217.2 million , $ 216.1 million and $ 12.4 million for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are net of the value of shares surrendered by employees in certain limited circumstances to satisfy the exercise price of options , and to satisfy employee tax obligations upon vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units and in connection with the exercise of stock options granted to the company 2019s employees under the company 2019s equity compensation plans . the withholding amount is based on the company 2019s minimum statutory withholding requirement . a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 29 , 2011 and changes during the year then ended is presented below : restricted outstanding weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding</td><td>weighted- average grant- date fair value per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 30 2010</td><td>1265</td><td>$ 28.21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>898</td><td>$ 34.93</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>$ 24.28</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>units forfeited</td><td>-42 ( 42 )</td><td>$ 31.39</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 29 2011</td><td>2088</td><td>$ 31.10</td></tr></table> as of october 29 , 2011 , there was $ 88.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was approximately $ 49.6 million , $ 67.7 million and $ 74.4 million , respectively . common stock repurchase program the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors has authorized the company to repurchase $ 5 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . under the program , the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 29 , 2011 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 125.0 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 4278.5 million under this program . an additional $ 721.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the amount of cash available to the company in the united states and the company 2019s financial performance , outlook and liquidity . the company also from time to time repurchases shares in settlement of employee tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units , or in certain limited circumstances to satisfy the exercise price of options granted to the company 2019s employees under the company 2019s equity compensation plans . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the intrinsic value in 2011?\nAnswer: 96.5\nQuestion: what was it in 2009?\nAnswer: 4.7\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 91.8\nQuestion: what is the 2009 value?\nAnswer: 4.7\nQuestion: what is the change over that?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "19.53191" } ]
CONVFINQA10362	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfrom those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors , including those we discuss under 201crisk factors 201d and elsewhere in this form 10-k . you should read 201crisk factors 201d and 201cforward-looking statements . 201d executive overview general american water works company , inc . ( herein referred to as 201camerican water 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) is the largest investor-owned united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured both by operating revenues and population served . our approximately 6400 employees provide drinking water , wastewater and other water related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states and in one canadian province . our primary business involves the ownership of water and wastewater utilities that provide water and wastewater services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers . our regulated businesses that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies in the states in which they operate . the federal government and the states also regulate environmental , health and safety and water quality matters . our regulated businesses provide services in 16 states and serve approximately 3.2 million customers based on the number of active service connections to our water and wastewater networks . we report the results of these businesses in our regulated businesses segment . we also provide services that are not subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies . we report the results of these businesses in our market-based operations segment . in 2014 , we continued the execution of our strategic goals . our commitment to growth through investment in our regulated infrastructure and expansion of our regulated customer base and our market-based operations , combined with operational excellence led to continued improvement in regulated operating efficiency , improved performance of our market-based operations , and enabled us to provide increased value to our customers and investors . during the year , we focused on growth , addressed regulatory lag , made more efficient use of capital and improved our regulated operation and maintenance ( 201co&m 201d ) efficiency ratio . 2014 financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , we continued to increase net income , while making significant capital investment in our infrastructure and implementing operational efficiency improvements to keep customer rates affordable . highlights of our 2014 operating results compared to 2013 and 2012 include: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from continuing operations</td><td>$ 2.39</td><td>$ 2.07</td><td>$ 2.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ -0.04 ( 0.04 )</td><td>$ -0.01 ( 0.01 )</td><td>$ -0.09 ( 0.09 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ 2.35</td><td>$ 2.06</td><td>$ 2.01</td></tr></table> continuing operations income from continuing operations included 4 cents per diluted share of costs resulting from the freedom industries chemical spill in west virginia in 2014 and included 14 cents per diluted share in 2013 related to a tender offer . earnings from continuing operations , adjusted for these two items , increased 10% ( 10 % ) , or 22 cents per share , mainly due to favorable operating results from our regulated businesses segment due to higher revenues and lower operating expenses , partially offset by higher depreciation expenses . also contributing to the overall increase in income from continuing operations was lower interest expense in 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. .\nQuestion: what is the diluted earnings per sharein 2014?\nAnswer: 2.35\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\nAnswer: 2.01\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 0.34\nQuestion: what percentage increase does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.16915" } ]
CONVFINQA1769	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhigher average borrowings . additionally , the recapitalization that occurred late in the first quarter of 2005 resulted in a full year of interest in 2006 as compared to approximately ten months in 2005 . the increase in interest expense in 2005 as compared to 2004 also resulted from the recapitalization in 2005 . income tax expense income tax expense totaled $ 150.2 million , $ 116.1 million and $ 118.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . this resulted in an effective tax rate of 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) , 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) and 37.6% ( 37.6 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . net earnings net earnings totaled $ 259.1 million , $ 196.6 and $ 189.4 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , or $ 1.37 , $ 1.53 and $ 1.48 per diluted share , respectively . segment results of operations transaction processing services ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>processing and services revenues</td><td>$ 2458777</td><td>$ 1208430</td><td>$ 892033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of revenues</td><td>1914148</td><td>904124</td><td>667078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross profit</td><td>544629</td><td>304306</td><td>224955</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>selling general and administrative expenses</td><td>171106</td><td>94889</td><td>99581</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>research and development costs</td><td>70879</td><td>85702</td><td>54038</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 302644</td><td>$ 123715</td><td>$ 71336</td></tr></table> revenues for the transaction processing services segment are derived from three main revenue channels ; enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international . revenues from transaction processing services totaled $ 2458.8 million , $ 1208.4 and $ 892.0 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1250.4 million during 2006 , as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 1067.2 million to the overall increase . the majority of the remaining 2006 growth is attributable to organic growth within the historically owned integrated financial solutions and international revenue channels , with international including $ 31.9 million related to the newly formed business process outsourcing operation in brazil . the overall segment increase of $ 316.4 in 2005 as compared to 2004 results from the inclusion of a full year of results for the 2004 acquisitions of aurum , sanchez , kordoba , and intercept , which contributed $ 301.1 million of the increase . cost of revenues for the transaction processing services segment totaled $ 1914.1 million , $ 904.1 million and $ 667.1 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1010.0 million during 2006 as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 848.2 million to the increase . gross profit as a percentage of revenues ( 201cgross margin 201d ) was 22.2% ( 22.2 % ) , 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) and 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the decrease in gross profit in 2006 as compared to 2005 is primarily due to the february 1 , 2006 certegy merger , which businesses typically have lower margins than those of the historically owned fis businesses . incremental intangible asset amortization relating to the certegy merger also contributed to the decrease in gross margin . included in cost of revenues was depreciation and amortization of $ 272.4 million , $ 139.8 million , and $ 94.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . selling , general and administrative expenses totaled $ 171.1 million , $ 94.9 million and $ 99.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the increase in 2006 compared to 2005 is primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 73.7 million to the overall increase of $ 76.2 million . the decrease of $ 4.7 million in 2005 as compared to 2004 is primarily attributable to the effect of acquisition related costs in 2004 . included in selling , general and administrative expenses was depreciation and amortization of $ 11.0 million , $ 9.1 million and $ 2.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the operating income in 2005?\nAnswer: 123715.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "71336.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2711	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following table presents average u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances for the years ended december 31 : years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td><td>$ 1994</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td><td>1585</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td><td>$ 3579</td></tr></table> although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2013 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2012 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.38 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 109.25 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 98.39 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . this increase was mainly due to higher levels of non-u.s . transaction accounts associated with the growth of new and existing business in assets under custody and administration . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings declined to $ 3.79 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 4.68 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , as higher levels of client deposits provided additional liquidity . average long-term debt increased to $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.01 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of extendible notes by state street bank in december 2012 , the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , and the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of senior debt in november 2013 . this increase was partly offset by maturities of $ 1.75 billion of senior debt in the second quarter of 2012 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 5.90 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay- downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to dictate what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the average total short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: 384.0\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to those advances in 2012?\nAnswer: 0.11412\nQuestion: and from 2011 to 2012, what was the change in these advances?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-214.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8232	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g and 4g network build outs . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and , as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany and france , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage among their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 104470 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and reduce the likelihood of churn . our master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced colocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 45310 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the revenue generated from newly acquired or constructed sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass-through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>65</td><td>11595</td><td>900</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asia</td><td>43865</td><td>2330</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>665</td><td>4910</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>715</td><td>6535</td><td>5800</td></tr></table> property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment selling , general , administrative and development expenses as we increase our presence in our existing markets or expand into new markets . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our sites but can be temporarily diluted by our development activities. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of new sites acquired and constructed during 2016 in us and asia?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "43930.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5217	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( \"nsai\" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with 5 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( \"ryder scott\" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2014 , 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 101 mmboe from december 31 , 2013 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2014 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>627</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfers to proved developed</td><td>-103 ( 103 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>728</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 included 121 mmboe in the eagle ford and 61 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 67 mmboe in the eagle ford , 26 mmboe in the bakken and 1 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 3149 million , $ 2536 million and $ 1995 million . a total of 102 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2014 , 19 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled in the second quarter of 2015 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to develop , is executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region lead to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes and civil unrest in 2013-2014 have also extended the project duration . as of december 31 , 2014 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped crude oil and condensate , ngls , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2015 through 2019 are projected to be $ 2915 million , $ 2598 million , $ 2493 million , $ 2669 million and $ 2745 million. .\nQuestion: what were costs incurred for the development of proved undeveloped reserves in 2014?\nAnswer: 3149.0\nQuestion: what were the costs in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2536.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5857	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n1 2 4 n o t e s effective january 1 , 2011 , all u.s . employees , including u.s . legacy bgi employees , will participate in the brsp . all plan assets in the two legacy bgi plans , including the 401k plan and retirement plan ( see below ) , were merged into the brsp on january 1 , 2011 . under the combined brsp , employee contributions of up to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible compensation , as defined by the plan and subject to irc limitations , will be matched by the company at 50% ( 50 % ) . in addition , the company will continue to make an annual retirement contribution to eligible participants equal to 3-5% ( 3-5 % ) of eligible compensation . blackrock institutional trust company 401 ( k ) savings plan ( formerly the bgi 401 ( k ) savings plan ) the company assumed a 401 ( k ) plan ( the 201cbgi plan 201d ) covering employees of former bgi as a result of the bgi transaction . as part of the bgi plan , employee contributions for participants with at least one year of service were matched at 200% ( 200 % ) of participants 2019 pre-tax contributions up to 2% ( 2 % ) of base salary and overtime , and matched 100% ( 100 % ) of the next 2% ( 2 % ) of base salary and overtime , as defined by the plan and subject to irc limitations . the maximum matching contribution a participant would have received is an amount equal to 6% ( 6 % ) of base salary up to the irc limitations . the bgi plan expense was $ 12 million for the year ended december 31 , 2010 and immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . effective january 1 , 2011 , the net assets of this plan merged into the brsp . blackrock institutional trust company retirement plan ( formerly the bgi retirement plan ) the company assumed a defined contribution money purchase pension plan ( 201cbgi retirement plan 201d ) as a result of the bgi transaction . all salaried employees of former bgi and its participating affiliates who were u.s . residents on the u.s . payroll were eligible to participate . for participants earning less than $ 100000 in base salary , the company contributed 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s total compensation ( base salary , overtime and performance bonus ) up to $ 100000 . for participants earning $ 100000 or more in base salary , the company contributed 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s base salary and overtime up to the irc limita- tion of $ 245000 in 2010 . these contributions were 25% ( 25 % ) vested once the participant has completed two years of service and then vested at a rate of 25% ( 25 % ) for each additional year of service completed . employees with five or more years of service under the retirement plan were 100% ( 100 % ) vested in their entire balance . the retirement plan expense was $ 13 million for the year ended december 31 , 2010 and immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . effective january 1 , 2011 , the net assets of this plan merged into the brsp . blackrock group personal pension plan blackrock investment management ( uk ) limited ( 201cbim 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company , contributes to the blackrock group personal pension plan , a defined contribution plan for all employees of bim . bim contributes between 6% ( 6 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of each employee 2019s eligible compensation . the expense for this plan was $ 22 million , $ 13 million and $ 16 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . defined benefit plans in 2009 , prior to the bgi transaction , the company had several defined benefit pension plans in japan , germany , luxembourg and jersey . all accrued benefits under these defined benefit plans are currently frozen and the plans are closed to new participants . in 2008 , the defined benefit pension values in luxembourg were transferred into a new defined contribution plan for such employees , removing future liabilities . participant benefits under the plans will not change with salary increases or additional years of service . through the bgi transaction , the company assumed defined benefit pension plans in japan and germany which are closed to new participants . during 2010 , these plans merged into the legacy blackrock plans in japan ( the 201cjapan plan 201d ) and germany . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the plan assets for these plans were approximately $ 19 million and $ 10 million , respectively , and the unfunded obligations were less than $ 6 million and $ 3 million , respectively , which were recorded in accrued compensation and benefits on the consolidated statements of financial condition . benefit payments for the next five years and in aggregate for the five years thereafter are not expected to be material . defined benefit plan assets for the japan plan of approximately $ 16 million are invested using a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equity securities , debt securities and other investments are used to preserve asset values , diversify risk and achieve the target investment return benchmark . investment strategies and asset allocations are based on consideration of plan liabilities and the funded status of the plan . investment performance and asset allocation are measured and monitored on an ongoing basis . the current target allocations for the plan assets are 45-50% ( 45-50 % ) for u.s . and international equity securities , 50-55% ( 50-55 % ) for u.s . and international fixed income securities and 0-5% ( 0-5 % ) for cash and cash equivalents . the table below provides the fair value of the defined benefit japan plan assets at december 31 , 2010 by asset category . the table also identifies the level of inputs used to determine the fair value of assets in each category . quoted prices significant in active other markets for observable identical assets inputs december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) ( level 1 ) ( level 2 ) 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>quoted prices inactive marketsfor identical assets ( level 1 )</td><td>significant other observable inputs ( level 2 )</td><td>december 31 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity securities</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fixed income securities</td><td>2014</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of plan assets</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 3</td><td>$ 16</td></tr></table> the assets and unfunded obligation for the defined benefit pension plan in germany and jersey were immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2010 . post-retirement benefit plans prior to the bgi transaction , the company had requirements to deliver post-retirement medical benefits to a closed population based in the united kingdom and through the bgi transaction , the company assumed a post-retirement benefit plan to a closed population of former bgi employees in the united kingdom . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , expenses and unfunded obligations for these benefits were immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in addition , through the bgi transaction , the company assumed a requirement to deliver post-retirement medical benefits to a .\nQuestion: what was the value for the expense related to personal pension plans in 2010?\nAnswer: 22.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2009?\nAnswer: 13.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5756	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 119 implementing further revisions to the capital accord in the u.s . ( such further revisions are commonly referred to as 201cbasel iii 201d ) . basel iii revised basel ii by , among other things , narrowing the definition of capital , and increasing capital requirements for specific exposures . basel iii also includes higher capital ratio requirements and provides that the tier 1 common capital requirement will be increased to 7% ( 7 % ) , comprised of a minimum ratio of 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) plus a 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) capital conservation buffer . implementation of the 7% ( 7 % ) tier 1 common capital requirement is required by january 1 , in addition , global systemically important banks ( 201cgsibs 201d ) will be required to maintain tier 1 common requirements above the 7% ( 7 % ) minimum in amounts ranging from an additional 1% ( 1 % ) to an additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) . in november 2012 , the financial stability board ( 201cfsb 201d ) indicated that it would require the firm , as well as three other banks , to hold the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common ; the requirement will be phased in beginning in 2016 . the basel committee also stated it intended to require certain gsibs to hold an additional 1% ( 1 % ) of tier 1 common under certain circumstances , to act as a disincentive for the gsib from taking actions that would further increase its systemic importance . currently , no gsib ( including the firm ) is required to hold this additional 1% ( 1 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , pursuant to the requirements of the dodd-frank act , u.s . federal banking agencies have proposed certain permanent basel i floors under basel ii and basel iii capital calculations . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of aoci related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under basel iii rules would be 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) as of december 31 , 2012 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non- gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts as a key measure to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . december 31 , 2012 ( in millions , except ratios ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tier 1 common under basel i rules</td><td>$ 140342</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans</td><td>4077</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>-453 ( 453 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules</td><td>$ 143966</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii rules ( a )</td><td>$ 1647903</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii rules ( b )</td><td>8.7% ( 8.7 % )</td></tr></table> estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii rules ( a ) $ 1647903 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii rules ( b ) 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) ( a ) key differences in the calculation of risk-weighted assets between basel i and basel iii include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; ( 2 ) basel iii market risk rwa reflects the new capital requirements related to trading assets and securitizations , which include incremental capital requirements for stress var , correlation trading , and re-securitization positions ; and ( 3 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . the actual impact on the firm 2019s capital ratios upon implementation could differ depending on final implementation guidance from the regulators , as well as regulatory approval of certain of the firm 2019s internal risk models . ( b ) the tier 1 common ratio is tier 1 common divided by rwa . the firm 2019s estimate of its tier 1 common ratio under basel iii reflects its current understanding of the basel iii rules based on information currently published by the basel committee and u.s . federal banking agencies and on the application of such rules to its businesses as currently conducted ; it excludes the impact of any changes the firm may make in the future to its businesses as a result of implementing the basel iii rules , possible enhancements to certain market risk models , and any further implementation guidance from the regulators . the basel iii capital requirements are subject to prolonged transition periods . the transition period for banks to meet the tier 1 common requirement under basel iii was originally scheduled to begin in 2013 , with full implementation on january 1 , 2019 . in november 2012 , the u.s . federal banking agencies announced a delay in the implementation dates for the basel iii capital requirements . the additional capital requirements for gsibs will be phased in starting january 1 , 2016 , with full implementation on january 1 , 2019 . management 2019s current objective is for the firm to reach , by the end of 2013 , an estimated basel iii tier i common ratio of 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) . additional information regarding the firm 2019s capital ratios and the federal regulatory capital standards to which it is subject is presented in supervision and regulation on pages 1 20138 of the 2012 form 10-k , and note 28 on pages 306 2013 308 of this annual report . broker-dealer regulatory capital jpmorgan chase 2019s principal u.s . broker-dealer subsidiaries are j.p . morgan securities llc ( 201cjpmorgan securities 201d ) and j.p . morgan clearing corp . ( 201cjpmorgan clearing 201d ) . jpmorgan clearing is a subsidiary of jpmorgan securities and provides clearing and settlement services . jpmorgan securities and jpmorgan clearing are each subject to rule 15c3-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 ( the 201cnet capital rule 201d ) . jpmorgan securities and jpmorgan clearing are also each registered as futures commission merchants and subject to rule 1.17 of the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) . jpmorgan securities and jpmorgan clearing have elected to compute their minimum net capital requirements in accordance with the 201calternative net capital requirements 201d of the net capital rule . at december 31 , 2012 , jpmorgan securities 2019 net capital , as defined by the net capital rule , was $ 13.5 billion , exceeding the minimum requirement by .\nQuestion: how much would be 9,5% of the estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii rules ( a )?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "156550.785" } ]
CONVFINQA5181	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nadobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2013 and 2012 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 160468</td><td>$ 163607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>20244</td><td>1038</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>16777</td><td>23771</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-55851 ( 55851 )</td><td>-1754 ( 1754 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-4066 ( 4066 )</td><td>-25387 ( 25387 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-1474 ( 1474 )</td><td>-807 ( 807 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 136098</td><td>$ 160468</td></tr></table> as of november 29 , 2013 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 11.4 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2010 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in july 2013 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2008 and 2009 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 48.4 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we settled the tax obligation resulting from this examination with cash and income tax assets totaling $ 41.2 million , and the resulting $ 7.2 million income tax benefit was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 5 million . note 10 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions in workforce and the consolidation of facilities in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies . during fiscal 2013 , we continued to implement restructuring activities under this plan . total costs incurred to date and expected to be incurred for closing redundant facilities are $ 12.2 million as all facilities under this plan have been exited as of november 29 , 2013 . other restructuring plans other restructuring plans include other adobe plans and other plans associated with certain of our acquisitions that are substantially complete . we continue to make cash outlays to settle obligations under these plans , however the current impact to our consolidated financial statements is not significant . our other restructuring plans primarily consist of the 2009 restructuring plan , which was implemented in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , in order to appropriately align our costs in connection with our fiscal 2010 operating plan. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: -24370.0\nQuestion: what about the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "160468.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5566	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 129 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , in 2014 from the 2013 period primarily due to a $ 63 million decrease in special charges recognized period-over-period as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 65 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . in 2014 , american recognized $ 29 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , american recognized $ 48 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 american recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , american recognized $ 65 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to the 2013 period . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 153 million in 2014 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 92 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . other nonoperating expense , net increased $ 69 million , or 81.0% ( 81.0 % ) , during 2014 primarily due to special charges recognized as a result of early debt extinguishment and an increase in foreign currency losses driven by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar in foreign currency transactions , principally in latin american markets . american recorded a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses in 2014 . see part ii , item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for further discussion of our cash held in venezuelan bolivars . in addition , american 2019s nonoperating special items included $ 48 million in special charges in the 2014 primarily related to the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>170</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify .\nQuestion: what was the total amount in aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections in 2013?\nAnswer: 320.0\nQuestion: and what was the value of the total reorganization items net?\nAnswer: 2640.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does that amount represent in relation to this value, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.12121" } ]
CONVFINQA7716	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 144 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report compared with $ 57 million for 2009 . decreases in cio and mort- gage banking var for 2010 were again driven by the decline in market volatility and position changes . the decline in mortgage banking var at december 31 , 2010 , reflects management 2019s deci- sion to reduce risk given market volatility at the time . the firm 2019s average ib and other var diversification benefit was $ 59 million or 37% ( 37 % ) of the sum for 2010 , compared with $ 82 million or 28% ( 28 % ) of the sum for 2009 . the firm experienced an increase in the diversification benefit in 2010 as positions changed and correla- tions decreased . in general , over the course of the year , var expo- sure can vary significantly as positions change , market volatility fluctuates and diversification benefits change . var back-testing the firm conducts daily back-testing of var against its market risk- related revenue , which is defined as the change in value of : princi- pal transactions revenue for ib and cio ( less private equity gains/losses and revenue from longer-term cio investments ) ; trading-related net interest income for ib , cio and mortgage bank- ing ; ib brokerage commissions , underwriting fees or other revenue ; revenue from syndicated lending facilities that the firm intends to distribute ; and mortgage fees and related income for the firm 2019s mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans , msrs , and all related hedges . daily firmwide market risk 2013related revenue excludes gains and losses from dva . the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib , cio and mortgage banking positions for 2010 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 248 out of 261 days in this period , with 12 days exceeding $ 210 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ex- ceeded the actual loss on each of those days . during 2010 , losses were sustained on 13 days , none of which exceeded the var measure . daily ib and other market risk-related gains and losses ( 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ) year ended december 31 , 2010 average daily revenue : $ 87 million $ in millions $ in millions daily ib and other var less market risk-related losses the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in december 31 , ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 35</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 39</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the basis point increase in 2010?\nAnswer: 35.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2009?\nAnswer: 39.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does the 2010 basis point increase represent in relation to this 2009 one?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.89744" } ]
CONVFINQA5705	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes receivable in 2014 , we entered into a $ 3.0 million promissory note with a privately held company which was recorded at cost . the interest rate on the promissory note is 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and is payable quarterly . all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the promissory note is due and payable on the earlier of august 26 , 2017 , or upon default . 5 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we lease various operating spaces in north america , europe , asia and australia under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements that expire on various dates through 2024 . these arrangements require us to pay certain operating expenses , such as taxes , repairs , and insurance and contain renewal and escalation clauses . we recognize rent expense under these arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease . as of december 31 , 2015 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 6306</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>6678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>6260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>5809</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>5580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21450</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 52083</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 6.7 million , $ 3.3 million and $ 3.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction such as our financial involvement in structural elements of asset construction , making decisions related to tenant improvement costs and purchasing insurance not reimbursable by the buyer-lessor ( the landlord ) , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction completion and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . due to our continued involvement in the property and lack of transferability of related risks and rewards of ownership to the landlord post construction , we account for the building and related improvements as a lease financing obligation . accordingly , as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 42.5 million and $ 43.6 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.3 million and $ 41.2 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation included in rent expense above , amounted to $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . there was no land lease expense for the year ended december 31 , 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the rent expense for operating leases at the end of 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6.7" } ]
CONVFINQA5835	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .\nQuestion: what was the interest expense net in 2016?\nAnswer: 26.4\nQuestion: and what was it in 2015?\nAnswer: 14.6\nQuestion: what was then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 11.8\nQuestion: what was the interest expense net in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "14.6" } ]
CONVFINQA7255	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these entities do not represent additional claims on the general assets of the company . the creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities to which they have advanced credit . obligations and commitments as part of its ongoing operations , the company enters into arrangements that obligate the company to make future payments under contracts such as debt agreements , lease agreements , and unconditional purchase obligations ( i.e. , obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices , such as 201ctake-or-pay 201d contracts ) . the unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into by the company in its normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available to the company . capital lease and debt obligations , which totaled $ 3.5 billion at may 25 , 2008 , are currently recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations , which totaled $ 1.7 billion at may 25 , 2008 , are not recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet , in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles . a summary of the company 2019s contractual obligations at the end of fiscal 2008 was as follows ( including obligations of discontinued operations ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions ) contractual obligations</td><td>( $ in millions ) total</td><td>( $ in millions ) less than 1 year</td><td>( $ in millions ) 1-3 years</td><td>( $ in millions ) 3-5 years</td><td>after 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 3531.4</td><td>$ 15.4</td><td>$ 521.6</td><td>$ 751.8</td><td>$ 2242.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>514.9</td><td>89.2</td><td>148.1</td><td>106.9</td><td>170.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>1199.6</td><td>1078.6</td><td>104.0</td><td>16.3</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5245.9</td><td>$ 1183.2</td><td>$ 773.7</td><td>$ 875.0</td><td>$ 2414.0</td></tr></table> the purchase obligations noted in the table above do not reflect approximately $ 374 million of open purchase orders , some of which are not legally binding . these purchase orders are settlable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year . the company is also contractually obligated to pay interest on its long-term debt obligations . the weighted average interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of may 25 , 2008 was approximately 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) . the company consolidates the assets and liabilities of certain entities from which it leases corporate aircraft . these entities have been determined to be variable interest entities and the company has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of these entities . the amounts reflected in contractual obligations of long-term debt , in the table above , include $ 54 million of liabilities of these variable interest entities to the creditors of such entities . the long-term debt recognized as a result of consolidating these entities does not represent additional claims on the general assets of the company . the creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities . as of may 25 , 2008 , the company was obligated to make rental payments of $ 67 million to the variable interest entities , of which $ 7 million is due in less than one year , $ 13 million is due in one to three years , and $ 47 million is due in three to five years . such amounts are not reflected in the table , above . as part of its ongoing operations , the company also enters into arrangements that obligate the company to make future cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event ( e.g. , guarantee debt or lease payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform ) . in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles , the following commercial commitments are not recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s .\nQuestion: what was the percentage of total contractual obligations was due to long-term debt at the end of 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.67317" } ]
CONVFINQA9502	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshares of citigroup common stock . the number of shares to be delivered will equal the cse award value divided by the then fair market value of the common stock . for cses awarded to certain employees whose compensation structure was approved by the special master , 50% ( 50 % ) of the shares to be delivered in april 2010 will be subject to restrictions on sale and transfer until january 20 , 2011 . in lieu of 2010 cap awards , certain retirement-eligible employees were instead awarded cses payable in april 2010 , but any shares that are to be delivered in april 2010 ( subject to stockholder approval ) will be subject to restrictions on sale or transfer that will lapse in four equal annual installments beginning january 20 , 2011 . cse awards have generally been accrued as compensation expenses in the year 2009 and will be recorded as a liability from the january 2010 grant date until the settlement date in april 2010 . if stockholders approve delivery of citigroup stock for the cse awards , cse awards will likely be paid as new issues of common stock as an exception to the company 2019s practice of delivering shares from treasury stock , and the recorded liability will be reclassified as equity at that time . in january 2009 , members of the management executive committee ( except the ceo and cfo ) received 30% ( 30 % ) of their incentive awards for 2008 as performance vesting-equity awards . these awards vest 50% ( 50 % ) if the price of citigroup common stock meets a price target of $ 10.61 , and 50% ( 50 % ) for a price target of $ 17.85 , in each case on or prior to january 14 , 2013 . the price target will be met only if the nyse closing price equals or exceeds the applicable price target for at least 20 nyse trading days within any period of 30 consecutive nyse trading days ending on or before january 14 , 2013 . any shares that have not vested by such date will vest according to a fraction , the numerator of which is the share price on the delivery date and the denominator of which is the price target of the unvested shares . no dividend equivalents are paid on unvested awards . fair value of the awards is recognized as compensation expense ratably over the vesting period . on july 17 , 2007 , the committee approved the management committee long-term incentive plan ( mc ltip ) ( pursuant to the terms of the shareholder-approved 1999 stock incentive plan ) under which participants received an equity award that could be earned based on citigroup 2019s performance against various metrics relative to peer companies and publicly- stated return on equity ( roe ) targets measured at the end of each calendar year beginning with 2007 . the final expense for each of the three consecutive calendar years was adjusted based on the results of the roe tests . no awards were earned for 2009 , 2008 or 2007 and no shares were issued because performance targets were not met . no new awards were made under the mc ltip since the initial award in july 2007 . cap participants in 2008 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , and fa cap participants in those years and in 2009 , could elect to receive all or part of their award in stock options . the figures presented in the stock option program tables ( see 201cstock option programs 201d below ) include options granted in lieu of cap and fa cap stock awards in those years . a summary of the status of citigroup 2019s unvested stock awards at december 31 , 2009 and changes during the 12 months ended december 31 , 2009 are presented below : unvested stock awards shares weighted-average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>unvested stock awards</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested at january 1 2009</td><td>226210859</td><td>$ 36.23</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new awards</td><td>162193923</td><td>$ 4.35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cancelled awards</td><td>-51873773 ( 51873773 )</td><td>$ 26.59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deleted awards</td><td>-568377 ( 568377 )</td><td>$ 13.91</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vested awards ( 1 )</td><td>-148011884 ( 148011884 )</td><td>$ 25.96</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>unvested at december 31 2009</td><td>187950748</td><td>$ 19.53</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the weighted-average market value of the vestings during 2009 was approximately $ 3.64 per share . at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 1.6 billion of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock awards net of the forfeiture provision . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years. .\nQuestion: what was the annual anticipated unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock awards to be recognized in 12/09?\nAnswer: 1.23077\nQuestion: what was the fair value of the shares vested in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "538763257.76" } ]
CONVFINQA5836	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .\nQuestion: what was the interest expense net in 2016?\nAnswer: 26.4\nQuestion: and what was it in 2015?\nAnswer: 14.6\nQuestion: what was then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 11.8\nQuestion: what was the interest expense net in 2015?\nAnswer: 14.6\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2015 interest expense net, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.80822" } ]
CONVFINQA356	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncommon stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .\nQuestion: what is the difference between discb share price of december 31 2013 and of december 31 2008?\nAnswer: 502.08\nQuestion: how much does that difference represents in relation to the number 100?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5.0208" } ]
CONVFINQA4041	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\neach clearing firm is required to deposit and maintain balances in the form of cash , u.s . government securities , certain foreign government securities , bank letters of credit or other approved investments to satisfy performance bond and guaranty fund requirements . all non-cash deposits are marked-to-market and haircut on a daily basis . securities deposited by the clearing firms are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and the clearing house does not earn any interest on these deposits . these balances may fluctuate significantly over time due to investment choices available to clearing firms and changes in the amount of contributions required . in addition , the rules and regulations of cbot require that collateral be provided for delivery of physical commodities , maintenance of capital requirements and deposits on pending arbitration matters . to satisfy these requirements , clearing firms that have accounts that trade certain cbot products have deposited cash , u.s . treasury securities or letters of credit . the clearing house marks-to-market open positions at least once a day ( twice a day for futures and options contracts ) , and require payment from clearing firms whose positions have lost value and make payments to clearing firms whose positions have gained value . the clearing house has the capability to mark-to-market more frequently as market conditions warrant . under the extremely unlikely scenario of simultaneous default by every clearing firm who has open positions with unrealized losses , the maximum exposure related to positions other than credit default and interest rate swap contracts would be one half day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering the clearing houses 2019 ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral deposits . for cleared credit default swap and interest rate swap contracts , the maximum exposure related to cme 2019s guarantee would be one full day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering cme 2019s ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral . during 2017 , the clearing house transferred an average of approximately $ 2.4 billion a day through the clearing system for settlement from clearing firms whose positions had lost value to clearing firms whose positions had gained value . the clearing house reduces the guarantee exposure through initial and maintenance performance bond requirements and mandatory guaranty fund contributions . the company believes that the guarantee liability is immaterial and therefore has not recorded any liability at december 31 , 2017 . at december 31 , 2016 , performance bond and guaranty fund contribution assets on the consolidated balance sheets included cash as well as u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities with maturity dates of 90 days or less . the u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities were purchased by cme , at its discretion , using cash collateral . the benefits , including interest earned , and risks of ownership accrue to cme . interest earned is included in investment income on the consolidated statements of income . there were no u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities held at december 31 , 2017 . the amortized cost and fair value of these securities at december 31 , 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) amortized . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2016 amortizedcost</td><td>2016 fairvalue</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . treasury securities</td><td>$ 5548.9</td><td>$ 5549.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . government agency securities</td><td>1228.3</td><td>1228.3</td></tr></table> cme has been designated as a systemically important financial market utility by the financial stability oversight council and maintains a cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . at december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , cme maintained $ 34.2 billion and $ 6.2 billion , respectively , within the cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . clearing firms , at their option , may instruct cme to deposit the cash held by cme into one of the ief programs . the total principal in the ief programs was $ 1.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and $ 6.8 billion at december 31 .\nQuestion: what was the total principal in the ief programs in 2017, in billions?\nAnswer: 1.1\nQuestion: and what was that in 2016, also in bllions?\nAnswer: 6.8\nQuestion: what was, then, the total principal in the ief programs for both of those years, in billions?\nAnswer: 7.9\nQuestion: and what is, in billlions, the average between them?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.95" } ]
CONVFINQA478	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfinancial statement impact we believe that our accruals for sales returns , rebates , and discounts are reasonable and appropriate based on current facts and circumstances . our global rebate and discount liabilities are included in sales rebates and discounts on our consolidated balance sheet . our global sales return liability is included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . as of december 31 , 2018 , a 5 percent change in our global sales return , rebate , and discount liability would have led to an approximate $ 275 million effect on our income before income taxes . the portion of our global sales return , rebate , and discount liability resulting from sales of our products in the u.s . was approximately 90 percent as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 . the following represents a roll-forward of our most significant u.s . pharmaceutical sales return , rebate , and discount liability balances , including managed care , medicare , and medicaid: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales return rebate and discount liabilities beginning of year</td><td>$ 4172.0</td><td>$ 3601.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reduction of net sales due to sales returns discounts and rebates ( 1 )</td><td>12529.6</td><td>10603.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash payments of discounts and rebates</td><td>-12023.4 ( 12023.4 )</td><td>-10033.2 ( 10033.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sales return rebate and discount liabilities end of year</td><td>$ 4678.2</td><td>$ 4172.0</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) adjustments of the estimates for these returns , rebates , and discounts to actual results were approximately 1 percent of consolidated net sales for each of the years presented . product litigation liabilities and other contingencies background and uncertainties product litigation liabilities and other contingencies are , by their nature , uncertain and based upon complex judgments and probabilities . the factors we consider in developing our product litigation liability reserves and other contingent liability amounts include the merits and jurisdiction of the litigation , the nature and the number of other similar current and past matters , the nature of the product and the current assessment of the science subject to the litigation , and the likelihood of settlement and current state of settlement discussions , if any . in addition , we accrue for certain product liability claims incurred , but not filed , to the extent we can formulate a reasonable estimate of their costs based primarily on historical claims experience and data regarding product usage . we accrue legal defense costs expected to be incurred in connection with significant product liability contingencies when both probable and reasonably estimable . we also consider the insurance coverage we have to diminish the exposure for periods covered by insurance . in assessing our insurance coverage , we consider the policy coverage limits and exclusions , the potential for denial of coverage by the insurance company , the financial condition of the insurers , and the possibility of and length of time for collection . due to a very restrictive market for product liability insurance , we are self-insured for product liability losses for all our currently marketed products . in addition to insurance coverage , we also consider any third-party indemnification to which we are entitled or under which we are obligated . with respect to our third-party indemnification rights , these considerations include the nature of the indemnification , the financial condition of the indemnifying party , and the possibility of and length of time for collection . the litigation accruals and environmental liabilities and the related estimated insurance recoverables have been reflected on a gross basis as liabilities and assets , respectively , on our consolidated balance sheets . impairment of indefinite-lived and long-lived assets background and uncertainties we review the carrying value of long-lived assets ( both intangible and tangible ) for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset ( or asset group ) may not be recoverable . we identify impairment by comparing the projected undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset ( or asset group ) to its carrying value . if an impairment is identified , a loss is recorded equal to the excess of the asset 2019s net book value over its fair value , and the cost basis is adjusted . goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . when required , a comparison of fair value to the carrying amount of assets is performed to determine the amount of any impairment. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of u.s . pharmaceutical sales return, rebate, and discount liability balances, including managed care, medicare, and medicaid from 2017 to 2018?\nAnswer: 506.2\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of that total in 2017?\nAnswer: 0.12133\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the variation in the reduction of net sales due to sales returns discounts and rebates?\nAnswer: 1926.2\nQuestion: and what percentage did this variation represent in relation to that reduction in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.18166" } ]
CONVFINQA9433	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmillion excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .\nQuestion: what were asian industrial net packaging sales in 2013?\nAnswer: 400.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2012?\nAnswer: 400.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 800.0\nQuestion: what were the sales in 2011?\nAnswer: 410.0\nQuestion: what are total sales for the 3 years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1210.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10039	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npotentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site- specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us with measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . annual expenses for personal injury-related events were $ 240 million in 2006 , $ 247 million in 2005 , and $ 288 million in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had accrued liabilities of $ 631 million and $ 619 million for future personal injury costs , respectively , of which $ 233 million and $ 274 million was recorded in current liabilities as accrued casualty costs , respectively . our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 87% ( 87 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 13% ( 13 % ) related to unasserted claims . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation . our personal injury claims activity was as follows : claims activity 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>claims activity</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>open claims beginning balance</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td><td>4085</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new claims</td><td>4190</td><td>4584</td><td>4366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>settled or dismissed claims</td><td>-4261 ( 4261 )</td><td>-4415 ( 4415 )</td><td>-4423 ( 4423 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>open claims ending balance at december 31</td><td>4126</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td></tr></table> depreciation 2013 the railroad industry is capital intensive . properties are carried at cost . provisions for depreciation are computed principally on the straight-line method based on estimated service lives of depreciable property . the lives are calculated using a separate composite annual percentage rate for each depreciable property group , based on the results of internal depreciation studies . we are required to submit a report on depreciation studies and proposed depreciation rates to the stb for review and approval every three years for equipment property and every six years for road property . the cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable railroad property retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation , and no gain or loss is recognized . a gain or loss is recognized in other income for all other property upon disposition because the gain or loss is not part of rail operations . the cost of internally developed software is capitalized and amortized over a five-year period . significant capital spending in recent years increased the total value of our depreciable assets . cash capital spending totaled $ 2.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , depreciation expense was $ 1.2 billion . we use various methods to estimate useful lives for each group of depreciable property . due to the capital intensive nature of the business and the large base of depreciable assets , variances to those estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . if the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year , annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $ 43 million . if the estimated useful lives of all assets to be depreciated were decreased by one year , annual depreciation expense would increase by approximately $ 45 million . income taxes 2013 as required under fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , we account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns . these .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of the open claims ending balance from 2005 to 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-71.0" } ]
CONVFINQA685	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n24 \| 2018 emerson annual report 2017 vs . 2016 2013 commercial & residential solutions sales were $ 5.9 billion in 2017 , an increase of $ 302 million , or 5 percent , reflecting favorable conditions in hvac and refrigeration markets in the u.s. , asia and europe , as well as u.s . and asian construction markets . underlying sales increased 5 percent ( $ 297 million ) on 6 percent higher volume , partially offset by 1 percent lower price . foreign currency translation deducted $ 20 million and acquisitions added $ 25 million . climate technologies sales were $ 4.2 billion in 2017 , an increase of $ 268 million , or 7 percent . global air conditioning sales were solid , led by strength in the u.s . and asia and robust growth in china partially due to easier comparisons , while sales were up modestly in europe and declined moderately in middle east/africa . global refrigeration sales were strong , reflecting robust growth in china on increased adoption of energy- efficient solutions and slight growth in the u.s . sensors and solutions had strong growth , while temperature controls was up modestly . tools & home products sales were $ 1.6 billion in 2017 , up $ 34 million compared to the prior year . professional tools had strong growth on favorable demand from oil and gas customers and in other construction-related markets . wet/dry vacuums sales were up moderately as favorable conditions continued in u.s . construction markets . food waste disposers increased slightly , while the storage business declined moderately . overall , underlying sales increased 3 percent in the u.s. , 4 percent in europe and 17 percent in asia ( china up 27 percent ) . sales increased 3 percent in latin america and 4 percent in canada , while sales decreased 5 percent in middle east/africa . earnings were $ 1.4 billion , an increase of $ 72 million driven by climate technologies , while margin was flat . increased volume and resulting leverage , savings from cost reduction actions , and lower customer accommodation costs of $ 16 million were largely offset by higher materials costs , lower price and unfavorable product mix . financial position , capital resources and liquidity the company continues to generate substantial cash from operations and has the resources available to reinvest for growth in existing businesses , pursue strategic acquisitions and manage its capital structure on a short- and long-term basis . cash flow from continuing operations ( dollars in millions ) 2016 2017 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating cash flow</td><td>$ 2499</td><td>2690</td><td>2892</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>percent of sales</td><td>17.2% ( 17.2 % )</td><td>17.6% ( 17.6 % )</td><td>16.6% ( 16.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital expenditures</td><td>$ 447</td><td>476</td><td>617</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>percent of sales</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow ( operating cash flow less capital expenditures )</td><td>$ 2052</td><td>2214</td><td>2275</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>percent of sales</td><td>14.1% ( 14.1 % )</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>13.1% ( 13.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>operating working capital</td><td>$ 755</td><td>1007</td><td>985</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>percent of sales</td><td>5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>6.6% ( 6.6 % )</td><td>5.7% ( 5.7 % )</td></tr></table> operating cash flow from continuing operations for 2018 was $ 2.9 billion , a $ 202 million , or 8 percent increase compared with 2017 , primarily due to higher earnings , partially offset by an increase in working capital investment to support higher levels of sales activity and income taxes paid on the residential storage divestiture . operating cash flow from continuing operations of $ 2.7 billion in 2017 increased 8 percent compared to $ 2.5 billion in 2016 , reflecting higher earnings and favorable changes in working capital . at september 30 , 2018 , operating working capital as a percent of sales was 5.7 percent compared with 6.6 percent in 2017 and 5.2 percent in 2016 . the increase in 2017 was due to higher levels of working capital in the acquired valves & controls business . operating cash flow from continuing operations funded capital expenditures of $ 617 million , dividends of $ 1.2 billion , and common stock purchases of $ 1.0 billion . in 2018 , the company repatriated $ 1.4 billion of cash held by non-u.s . subsidiaries , which was part of the company 2019s previously announced plans . these funds along with increased short-term borrowings and divestiture proceeds supported acquisitions of $ 2.2 billion . contributions to pension plans were $ 61 million in 2018 , $ 45 million in 2017 and $ 66 million in 2016 . capital expenditures related to continuing operations were $ 617 million , $ 476 million and $ 447 million in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . free cash flow from continuing operations ( operating cash flow less capital expenditures ) was $ 2.3 billion in 2018 , up 3 percent . free cash flow was $ 2.2 billion in 2017 , compared with $ 2.1 billion in 2016 . the company is targeting capital spending of approximately $ 650 million in 2019 . net cash paid in connection with acquisitions was $ 2.2 billion , $ 3.0 billion and $ 132 million in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . proceeds from divestitures not classified as discontinued operations were $ 201 million and $ 39 million in 2018 and 2017 , respectively . dividends were $ 1.2 billion ( $ 1.94 per share ) in 2018 , compared with $ 1.2 billion ( $ 1.92 per share ) in 2017 and $ 1.2 billion ( $ 1.90 per share ) in 2016 . in november 2018 , the board of directors voted to increase the quarterly cash dividend 1 percent , to an annualized rate of $ 1.96 per share . purchases of emerson common stock totaled $ 1.0 billion , $ 400 million and $ 601 million in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , at average per share prices of $ 66.25 , $ 60.51 and $ 48.11 . the board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 70 million common shares in november 2015 , and 41.8 million shares remain available for purchase under this authorization . the company purchased 15.1 million shares in 2018 , 6.6 million shares in 2017 , and 12.5 million shares in 2016 under this authorization and the remainder of the may 2013 authorization. .\nQuestion: what was the value of capital expenditures in 2018?\nAnswer: 617.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2017?\nAnswer: 476.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 141.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.29622" } ]
CONVFINQA4517	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2014 , 2013 and 2012 . the decrease in our consolidated net adjustments for 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily due to a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our aeronautics , mfc and mst business segments . the increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2013 as compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our mst and mfc business segments and , to a lesser extent , the increase in the favorable resolution of contractual matters for the corporation . the consolidated net adjustments for 2014 are inclusive of approximately $ 650 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs at mst and net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) at mfc as described in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations below . the consolidated net adjustments for 2013 and 2012 are inclusive of approximately $ 600 million and $ 500 million in unfavorable items , which include a significant profit reduction on the f-35 development contract in both years , as well as a significant profit reduction on the c-5 program in 2013 , each as described in our aeronautics business segment 2019s results of operations discussion below . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , f-22 raptor and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td><td>$ 14953</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td><td>1699</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td><td>$ 30100</td></tr></table> 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2014 increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2014 increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2013 decreased $ 830 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 530 million for the f-16 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 13 aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to 37 delivered in 2012 ) partially offset by aircraft configuration mix ; about $ 385 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 25 aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to 34 in 2012 ) partially offset by increased sustainment activities ; approximately $ 255 million for the f-22 program , which includes about $ 205 million due to .\nQuestion: what was the change in operating profit for aeronautics in 2014?\nAnswer: 37.0\nQuestion: what was the operating profit in 2013?\nAnswer: 1612.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.02295" } ]
CONVFINQA3574	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the past two years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . there is no impairment of any of our mutual fund investments at december 31 , 2009 . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 and .9% ( .9 % ) lower than our present estimate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) for the 2010 effective tax rate . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . 2008 versus 2007 . investment advisory revenues decreased 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , or $ 118 million , to $ 1.76 billion in 2008 as average assets under our management decreased $ 16 billion to $ 358.2 billion . the average annualized fee rate earned on our assets under management was 49.2 basis points in 2008 , down from the 50.2 basis points earned in 2007 , as lower equity market valuations resulted in a greater percentage of our assets under management being attributable to lower fee fixed income portfolios . continuing stress on the financial markets and resulting lower equity valuations as 2008 progressed resulted in lower average assets under our management , lower investment advisory fees and lower net income as compared to prior periods . net revenues decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 112 million , to $ 2.12 billion . operating expenses were $ 1.27 billion in 2008 , up 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) or $ 36 million from 2007 . net operating income for 2008 decreased $ 147.9 million , or 14.8% ( 14.8 % ) , to $ 848.5 million . higher operating expenses in 2008 and decreased market valuations during the latter half of 2008 , which lowered our assets under management and advisory revenues , resulted in our 2008 operating margin declining to 40.1% ( 40.1 % ) from 44.7% ( 44.7 % ) in 2007 . non-operating investment losses in 2008 were $ 52.3 million as compared to investment income of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . investment losses in 2008 include non-cash charges of $ 91.3 million for the other than temporary impairment of certain of the firm 2019s investments in sponsored mutual funds . net income in 2008 fell 27% ( 27 % ) or nearly $ 180 million from 2007 . diluted earnings per share , after the retrospective application of new accounting guidance effective in 2009 , decreased to $ 1.81 , down $ .59 or 24.6% ( 24.6 % ) from $ 2.40 in 2007 . a non-operating charge to recognize other than temporary impairments of our sponsored mutual fund investments reduced diluted earnings per share by $ .21 in 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned from the t . rowe price mutual funds distributed in the united states decreased 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , or $ 114.5 million , to $ 1.24 billion . average mutual fund assets were $ 216.1 billion in 2008 , down $ 16.7 billion from 2007 . mutual fund assets at december 31 , 2008 , were $ 164.4 billion , down $ 81.6 billion from the end of 2007 . net inflows to the mutual funds during 2008 were $ 3.9 billion , including $ 1.9 billion to the money funds , $ 1.1 billion to the bond funds , and $ .9 billion to the stock funds . the value , equity index 500 , and emerging markets stock funds combined to add $ 4.1 billion , while the mid-cap growth and equity income stock funds had net redemptions of $ 2.2 billion . net fund inflows of $ 6.2 billion originated in our target-date retirement funds , which in turn invest in other t . rowe price funds . fund net inflow amounts in 2008 are presented net of $ 1.3 billion that was transferred to target-date trusts from the retirement funds during the year . decreases in market valuations and income not reinvested lowered our mutual fund assets under management by $ 85.5 billion during 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million . average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 . these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and subadvised portfolios . net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts . decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 . management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .\nQuestion: what are the investment advisory revenues in 2008, in millions?\nAnswer: 1760.0\nQuestion: what about in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1878.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7654	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company further presents total net 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure , net of deferred compensation investments and hedged investments , to reflect another gauge for investors as the economic impact of investments held pursuant to deferred compensation arrangements is substantially offset by a change in compensation expense and the impact of hedged investments is substantially mitigated by total return swap hedges . carried interest capital allocations are excluded as there is no impact to blackrock 2019s stockholders 2019 equity until such amounts are realized as performance fees . finally , the company 2019s regulatory investment in federal reserve bank stock , which is not subject to market or interest rate risk , is excluded from the company 2019s net economic investment exposure . ( dollar amounts in millions ) december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>december 31 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total investments gaap</td><td>$ 1750</td><td>$ 1631</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investments held by consolidated sponsored investmentfunds ( 1 )</td><td>-524 ( 524 )</td><td>-587 ( 587 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net exposure to consolidated investment funds</td><td>430</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total investments as adjusted</td><td>1656</td><td>1519</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>federal reserve bank stock ( 2 )</td><td>-89 ( 89 )</td><td>-328 ( 328 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>carried interest</td><td>-85 ( 85 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred compensation investments</td><td>-62 ( 62 )</td><td>-65 ( 65 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>hedged investments</td><td>-209 ( 209 )</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure</td><td>$ 1211</td><td>$ 1062</td></tr></table> total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure . . . $ 1211 $ 1062 ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , approximately $ 524 million and $ 587 million , respectively , of blackrock 2019s total gaap investments were maintained in sponsored investment funds that were deemed to be controlled by blackrock in accordance with gaap , and , therefore , are consolidated even though blackrock may not economically own a majority of such funds . ( 2 ) the decrease of $ 239 million related to a lower holding requirement of federal reserve bank stock held by blackrock institutional trust company , n.a . ( 201cbtc 201d ) . total investments , as adjusted , at december 31 , 2012 increased $ 137 million from december 31 , 2011 , resulting from $ 765 million of purchases/capital contributions , $ 185 million from positive market valuations and earnings from equity method investments , and $ 64 million from net additional carried interest capital allocations , partially offset by $ 742 million of sales/maturities and $ 135 million of distributions representing return of capital and return on investments. .\nQuestion: what was the sum of total 2010 economic investment exposure and the positive value of investments held by consolidated sponsored investment funds?\nAnswer: 1735.0\nQuestion: what is the positive value of investments held?\nAnswer: 524.0\nQuestion: what is that divided the total sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.30202" } ]
CONVFINQA34	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmasco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the company 2019s warranty liability between 2011 and 2012?\nAnswer: 16.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change of this value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.15686" } ]
CONVFINQA7062	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nuntil the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings . changes in the fair value of the derivatives that are attributable to the ineffective portion of the hedges , or of derivatives that are not considered to be highly effective hedges , if any , are immediately recognized in earnings . the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding foreign currency hedges at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.3 billion and $ 1.7 billion . the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding interest rate swaps at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 503 million and $ 450 million . derivative instruments did not have a material impact on net earnings and comprehensive income during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 . substantially all of our derivatives are designated for hedge accounting . see note 15 for more information on the fair value measurements related to our derivative instruments . stock-based compensation 2013 compensation cost related to all share-based payments including stock options and restricted stock units is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award . we generally recognize the compensation cost ratably over a three-year vesting period . income taxes 2013 we periodically assess our tax filing exposures related to periods that are open to examination . based on the latest available information , we evaluate our tax positions to determine whether the position will more likely than not be sustained upon examination by the internal revenue service ( irs ) . if we cannot reach a more-likely-than-not determination , no benefit is recorded . if we determine that the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained , we record the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not to be realized when the tax position is settled . we record interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of income tax expense on our statements of earnings . interest and penalties are not material . accumulated other comprehensive loss 2013 changes in the balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of income taxes , consisted of the following ( in millions ) : postretirement benefit plan adjustments other , net accumulated comprehensive . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>postretirement benefit plan adjustments</td><td>other net</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive loss</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2010</td><td>$ -8564 ( 8564 )</td><td>$ -31 ( 31 )</td><td>$ -8595 ( 8595 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other comprehensive ( loss ) income</td><td>-430 ( 430 )</td><td>15</td><td>-415 ( 415 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>-8994 ( 8994 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>-9010 ( 9010 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other comprehensive loss</td><td>-2192 ( 2192 )</td><td>-55 ( 55 )</td><td>-2247 ( 2247 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>-11186 ( 11186 )</td><td>-71 ( 71 )</td><td>-11257 ( 11257 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other comprehensive ( loss ) income</td><td>-2346 ( 2346 )</td><td>110</td><td>-2236 ( 2236 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ -13532 ( 13532 )</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ -13493 ( 13493 )</td></tr></table> the postretirement benefit plan adjustments are shown net of tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 of $ 7.4 billion , $ 6.1 billion , and $ 4.9 billion . these tax benefits include amounts recognized on our income tax returns as current deductions and deferred income taxes , which will be recognized on our tax returns in future years . see note 7 and note 9 for more information on our income taxes and postretirement plans . recent accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2012 , we retrospectively adopted new guidance issued by the financial accounting standards board by presenting total comprehensive income and the components of net income and other comprehensive loss in two separate but consecutive statements . the adoption of this guidance resulted only in a change in how we present other comprehensive loss in our consolidated financial statements and did not have any impact on our results of operations , financial position , or cash flows. .\nQuestion: what was the value change in the aggregate notional amount of outstanding foreign currency hedges from 2011 to 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.4" } ]
CONVFINQA6439	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2017 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................... . 39 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2017 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 )</td><td>27</td></tr></table> infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................ . 27 ______________________________ ( 1 ) see note 29 - subsequent events in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . amcel ae , aoplus ae , ateva ae , avicor ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx ae , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , dur- o-set ae , ecomid ae , ecovae ae , forflex ae , forprene ae , frianyl ae , fortron ae , ghr ae , gumfit ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , laprene ae , metalx ae , mowilith ae , mt ae , nilamid ae , nivionplast ae , nutrinova ae , nylfor ae , pibiflex ae , pibifor ae , pibiter ae , polifor ae , resyn ae , riteflex ae , slidex ae , sofprene ae , sofpur ae , sunett ae , talcoprene ae , tecnoprene ae , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vectra ae , vinac ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc . hostaform ae is a registered trademark of hoechst gmbh . mowilith ae and nilamid ae are registered trademarks of celanese in most european countries . we monitor competitive developments and defend against infringements on our intellectual property rights . neither celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent , trademark , copyright or trade secret . environmental and other regulation matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed in item 1a . risk factors , as well as note 2 - summary of accounting policies , note 16 - environmental and note 24 - commitments and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. .\nQuestion: what was the research and development expense in 2017?\nAnswer: 72.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\nAnswer: 78.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the variation over the year?\nAnswer: -6.0\nQuestion: and what is this variation as a percent of the 2016 expense?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.07692" } ]
CONVFINQA3056	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npollutants discharged to waters of the united states and remediation of waters affected by such discharge . to our knowledge , we are in compliance with all material requirements associated with the various regulations . the united states congress is actively considering legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases , including carbon dioxide and methane . in addition , state and regional initiatives to regulate greenhouse gas emissions are underway . we are monitoring federal and state legislation to assess the potential impact on our operations . our most recent calculation of direct greenhouse gas emissions for oneok and oneok partners is estimated to be less than 6 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents on an annual basis . we will continue efforts to quantify our direct greenhouse gas emissions and will report such emissions as required by any mandatory reporting rule , including the rules anticipated to be issued by the epa in mid-2009 . superfund - the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act , also known as cercla or superfund , imposes liability , without regard to fault or the legality of the original act , on certain classes of persons who contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the environment . these persons include the owner or operator of a facility where the release occurred and companies that disposed or arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances found at the facility . under cercla , these persons may be liable for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances released into the environment , damages to natural resources and the costs of certain health studies . chemical site security - the united states department of homeland security ( homeland security ) released an interim rule in april 2007 that requires companies to provide reports on sites where certain chemicals , including many hydrocarbon products , are stored . we completed the homeland security assessments and our facilities were subsequently assigned to one of four risk-based tiers ranging from high ( tier 1 ) to low ( tier 4 ) risk , or not tiered at all due to low risk . a majority of our facilities were not tiered . we are waiting for homeland security 2019s analysis to determine if any of the tiered facilities will require site security plans and possible physical security enhancements . climate change - our environmental and climate change strategy focuses on taking steps to minimize the impact of our operations on the environment . these strategies include : ( i ) developing and maintaining an accurate greenhouse gas emissions inventory , according to rules anticipated to be issued by the epa in mid-2009 ; ( ii ) improving the efficiency of our various pipelines , natural gas processing facilities and natural gas liquids fractionation facilities ; ( iii ) following developing technologies for emission control ; ( iv ) following developing technologies to capture carbon dioxide to keep it from reaching the atmosphere ; and ( v ) analyzing options for future energy investment . currently , certain subsidiaries of oneok partners participate in the processing and transmission sectors and ldcs in our distribution segment participate in the distribution sector of the epa 2019s natural gas star program to voluntarily reduce methane emissions . a subsidiary in our oneok partners 2019 segment was honored in 2008 as the 201cnatural gas star gathering and processing partner of the year 201d for its efforts to positively address environmental issues through voluntary implementation of emission-reduction opportunities . in addition , we continue to focus on maintaining low rates of lost-and- unaccounted-for methane gas through expanded implementation of best practices to limit the release of methane during pipeline and facility maintenance and operations . our most recent calculation of our annual lost-and-unaccounted-for natural gas , for all of our business operations , is less than 1 percent of total throughput . employees we employed 4742 people at january 31 , 2009 , including 739 people employed by kansas gas service , who were subject to collective bargaining contracts . the following table sets forth our contracts with collective bargaining units at january 31 , employees contract expires . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>union</td><td>employees</td><td>contract expires</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united steelworkers of america</td><td>414</td><td>june 30 2009</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international union of operating engineers</td><td>13</td><td>june 30 2009</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>international brotherhood of electrical workers</td><td>312</td><td>june 30 2010</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: in january 2009, what was the number of employees that were subject to collective bargaining contracts?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "739.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10574	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbacklog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to higher orders on f-35 and c-130 programs . backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 due to increased volume on the f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by decreased volume on the f-16 program . operating profit is also expected to increase in the low single-digit percentage range , driven by increased volume on the f-35 program offset by contract mix that results in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs 2019 technical services business provides a comprehensive portfolio of technical and sustainment services . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5596</td><td>$ 5654</td><td>$ 6115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>508</td><td>472</td><td>498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>8.3% ( 8.3 % )</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 4800</td><td>$ 6000</td><td>$ 6300</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 58 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 395 million as a result of key program completions , lower customer funding levels and increased competition , coupled with the fragmentation of existing large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price when re-competed ( including cms-citic ) . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 230 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 110 million due to the start-up of new programs and growth in recently awarded programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit increased $ 36 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to improved program performance and risk retirements , offset by decreased operating profit resulting from the activities mentioned above for net sales . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 70 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 461 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 475 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to decreased volume in technical services programs reflecting market pressures . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of about $ 330 million due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 26 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to the activities mentioned above for sales , partially offset by severance recoveries related to the restructuring announced in november 2013 of approximately $ 20 million in 2014 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were comparable in 2014 and 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the backlog at year-end in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4800.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9752	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunited parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 807</td><td>$ 3804</td><td>$ 3338</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash operating activities ( a )</td><td>7301</td><td>4505</td><td>4398</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans )</td><td>-917 ( 917 )</td><td>-1436 ( 1436 )</td><td>-3240 ( 3240 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax receivables and payables</td><td>280</td><td>236</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities</td><td>-148 ( 148 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-340 ( 340 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other operating activities</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 7216</td><td>$ 7073</td><td>$ 3835</td></tr></table> ( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items . cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2010 to 2012 time period . operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2012 , compared with 2011 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by changes in our working capital position , which was impacted by overall growth in the business . the change in the cash flows for income tax receivables and payables in 2011 and 2010 was primarily related to the timing of discretionary pension contributions during 2010 , as discussed further in the following paragraph . except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans . 2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan . 2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 . 2022 in 2010 , we made $ 2.0 billion in discretionary contributions to our ups retirement and ups pension plans , and $ 980 million in required contributions to our ups ibt pension plan . 2022 the remaining contributions in the 2010 through 2012 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s . postretirement medical benefit plans . as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 7.327 billion . approximately $ 4.211 billion of this amount was held in european subsidiaries with the intended purpose of completing the acquisition of tnt express n.v . ( see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements ) . excluding this portion of cash held outside the u.s . for acquisition-related purposes , approximately 50%-60% ( 50%-60 % ) of the remaining cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year . the amount of cash held by our u.s . and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business . cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners . to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s . when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .\nQuestion: what was the value of net cash from operating activities in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7216.0" } ]
CONVFINQA186	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american and european cruise guests over the past five years : weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths global cruise guests ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths</td><td>globalcruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>north americancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>363000</td><td>84050</td><td>17340000</td><td>10198000</td><td>5000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>391000</td><td>92300</td><td>18800000</td><td>10781000</td><td>5540000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>412000</td><td>92650</td><td>20227000</td><td>11625000</td><td>5894000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>425000</td><td>98650</td><td>20898000</td><td>11640000</td><td>6139000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>432000</td><td>98750</td><td>21300000</td><td>11816000</td><td>6399000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a com- bination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider , cruise industry news and cruise line international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2009 through 2012 . year 2013 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 3 ) source : clia europe , formerly european cruise council , for years 2009 through 2012 . year 2013 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . north america the majority of cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 56% ( 56 % ) of global cruise guests in 2013 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) from 2009 to 2013 . europe cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of global cruise guests in 2013 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) from 2009 to 2013 . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . based on industry data , cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) of global cruise guests in 2013 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 15% ( 15 % ) from 2011 to 2013 . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our princi- pal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consumers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influenced by political and general economic conditions . com- panies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues , our brands globally , expenditures and ensure adequate cash and liquid- ity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , ization and maintenance of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while prudently expanding our fleet with new state-of- the-art cruise ships , ships by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , service customer preferences and expectations in an innovative manner , while supporting our strategic focus on profitability , and .\nQuestion: in 2013, what was the total of global cruise guests from either north america or europe?\nAnswer: 18215000.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of all global cruise guests?\nAnswer: 21300000.0\nQuestion: what was the number, then, of global cruise guests that weren't from either of those places?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3085000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10795	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 117 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to address the financing needs of its clients . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfill its obligations under these guarantees , and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . most of these commitments and guarantees are refinanced , extended , cancelled , or expire without being drawn upon or a default occurring . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements . for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments , refer to note 27 . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into certain securities and derivative contracts . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by ccps . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , refer to note 27 . derivative contracts derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risks including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates , foreign exchange , equities , and commodities . the firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities , including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for a further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , refer to note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>$ 54213</td><td>$ 56523</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-15322 ( 15322 )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 38891</td><td>$ 40415</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where appropriate legal opinions have not been either sought or obtained with respect to master netting agreements . the fair value of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 54.2 billion and $ 56.5 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government securities ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 15.3 billion and $ 16.1 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative contracts move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , refer to note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative contracts , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be .\nQuestion: in the 2018 review of the net derivative receivable, how much did the total net of cash collateral represent in relation to the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables?\nAnswer: 3.53825\nQuestion: and what was that net of cash collateral in the year before?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "56523.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10616	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndecember 2016 acquisition of camber and higher volumes in fleet support and oil and gas services , partially offset by lower nuclear and environmental volumes due to the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . segment operating income 2018 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was $ 32 million , compared to operating income of $ 21 million in 2017 . the increase was primarily due to an allowance for accounts receivable in 2017 on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract and higher income from operating investments at our nuclear and environmental joint ventures , partially offset by one time employee bonus payments in 2018 related to the tax act and lower performance in fleet support services . 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 . the increase was primarily due to improved performance in oil and gas services and higher volume in mdis services following the december 2016 acquisition of camber , partially offset by the establishment of an allowance for accounts receivable on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract in 2017 and the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . backlog total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 23 billion . total backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) . backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded idiq orders . for contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer . the following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>december 31 2018 total backlog</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>total backlog</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ingalls</td><td>$ 9943</td><td>$ 1422</td><td>$ 11365</td><td>$ 5920</td><td>$ 2071</td><td>$ 7991</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>newport news</td><td>6767</td><td>4144</td><td>10911</td><td>6976</td><td>5608</td><td>12584</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>technical solutions</td><td>339</td><td>380</td><td>719</td><td>478</td><td>314</td><td>792</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total backlog</td><td>$ 17049</td><td>$ 5946</td><td>$ 22995</td><td>$ 13374</td><td>$ 7993</td><td>$ 21367</td></tr></table> we expect approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of the $ 23 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , to be converted into sales in 2019 . u.s . government orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . awards 2018 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 9.8 billion . significant new awards during the period included contracts for the construction of three arleigh burke class ( ddg 51 ) destroyers , for the detail design and construction of richard m . mccool jr . ( lpd 29 ) , for procurement of long-lead-time material for enterprise ( cvn 80 ) , and for the construction of nsc 10 ( unnamed ) and nsc 11 ( unnamed ) . in addition , we received awards in 2019 valued at $ 15.2 billion for detail design and construction of the gerald r . ford class ( cvn 78 ) aircraft carriers enterprise ( cvn 80 ) and cvn 81 ( unnamed ) . 2017 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was approximately $ 8.1 billion . significant new awards during this period included the detailed design and construction contract for bougainville ( lha 8 ) and the execution contract for the rcoh of uss george washington ( cvn 73 ) . .\nQuestion: what was the operating income in 2017?\nAnswer: 21.0\nQuestion: how much did this change from 2016?\nAnswer: 13.0\nQuestion: and the percentage increase during this time?\nAnswer: 1.625\nQuestion: between 2017 and 2018 what was the difference in operating income for the technical solutions segment?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8079	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncorporate/other corporate/other includes global staff functions ( includes finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) and other corporate expense , global operations and technology ( o&t ) , residual corporate treasury and corporate items . at december 31 , 2009 , this segment had approximately $ 230 billion of assets , consisting primarily of the company 2019s liquidity portfolio , including $ 110 billion of cash and cash equivalents. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ -1663 ( 1663 )</td><td>$ -2680 ( 2680 )</td><td>$ -2008 ( 2008 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>-8893 ( 8893 )</td><td>422</td><td>-302 ( 302 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ -10556 ( 10556 )</td><td>$ -2258 ( 2258 )</td><td>$ -2310 ( 2310 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 1420</td><td>$ 510</td><td>$ 1813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ -11975 ( 11975 )</td><td>$ -2769 ( 2769 )</td><td>$ -4120 ( 4120 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income taxes ( benefits )</td><td>-4369 ( 4369 )</td><td>-587 ( 587 )</td><td>-1446 ( 1446 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ -7606 ( 7606 )</td><td>$ -2182 ( 2182 )</td><td>$ -2674 ( 2674 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes</td><td>-445 ( 445 )</td><td>4002</td><td>708</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ -8051 ( 8051 )</td><td>$ 1820</td><td>$ -1966 ( 1966 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>net income attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ -8051 ( 8051 )</td><td>$ 1820</td><td>$ -1968 ( 1968 )</td></tr></table> 2009 vs . 2008 revenues , net of interest expense declined , primarily due to the pretax loss on debt extinguishment related to the repayment of the $ 20 billion of tarp trust preferred securities and the pretax loss in connection with the exit from the loss-sharing agreement with the u.s . government . revenues also declined , due to the absence of the 2008 sale of citigroup global services limited recorded in o&t . this was partially offset by a pretax gain related to the exchange offers , revenues and higher intersegment eliminations . operating expenses increased , primarily due to intersegment eliminations and increases in compensation , partially offset by lower repositioning reserves . 2008 vs . 2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities . operating expenses declined , primarily due to lower restructuring charges in 2008 as well as reductions in incentive compensation and benefits expense. .\nQuestion: what are the total operating expenses in 2009?\nAnswer: 1420.0\nQuestion: what about in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "510.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9550	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 116</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>inventory</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>2549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intangible assets 2014indefinite-lived</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>regulatory assets</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other noncurrent assets</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-401 ( 401 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-recourse debt</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>regulatory liabilities</td><td>-117 ( 117 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>redeemable preferred stock</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>net identifiable assets acquired</td><td>994</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>goodwill</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2011 , the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded at provisional amounts based on the preliminary purchase price allocation . the company is in the process of obtaining additional information to identify and measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition within the measurement period , which could be up to one year from the date of acquisition . such provisional amounts will be retrospectively adjusted to reflect any new information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that , if known , would have affected the measurement of these amounts . additionally , key input assumptions and their sensitivity to the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are currently being reviewed by management . it is likely that the value of the generation business related property , plant and equipment , the intangible asset related to the electric security plan with its regulated customers and long-term coal contracts , the 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) equity ownership interest in the ohio valley electric corporation , and deferred taxes could change as the valuation process is finalized . dpler , dpl 2019s wholly-owned competitive retail electric service ( 201ccres 201d ) provider , will also likely have changes in its initial purchase price allocation for the valuation of its intangible assets for the trade name , and customer relationships and contracts . as noted in the table above , the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in the recognition of $ 2.5 billion of goodwill . factors primarily contributing to a price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets include , but are not limited to : the ability to expand the u.s . utility platform in the mid-west market , the ability to capitalize on utility management experience gained from ipl , enhanced ability to negotiate with suppliers of fuel and energy , the ability to capture value associated with aes 2019 u.s . tax position , a well- positioned generating fleet , the ability of dpl to leverage its assembled workforce to take advantage of growth opportunities , etc . our ability to realize the benefit of dpl 2019s goodwill depends on the realization of expected benefits resulting from a successful integration of dpl into aes 2019 existing operations and our ability to respond to the changes in the ohio utility market . for example , utilities in ohio continue to face downward pressure on operating margins due to the evolving regulatory environment , which is moving towards a market-based competitive pricing mechanism . at the same time , the declining energy prices are also reducing operating .\nQuestion: what was the amount in cash?\nAnswer: 116.0\nQuestion: and accounts receivables?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "278.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8981	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfederal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2007 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>$ 595338</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>$ 663750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>96454</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-80258 ( 80258 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>$ 756703</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the variation in the additions during 2005 and 2006?\nAnswer: 5908.0\nQuestion: and the increase in the deductions in 2006 and 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "67451.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10953	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . significant revenue arrangements ( continued ) $ 7 million of development and commercialization milestone payments . additionally , kissei agreed to reimburse the company for certain development costs , including a portion of costs for phase 2 trials of vx-702 . research funding ended under this program in june 2000 , and the company has received the full amount of research funding specified under the agreement . kissei has exclusive rights to develop and commercialize vx-702 in japan and certain far east countries and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . the company retains exclusive marketing rights outside the far east and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . in addition , the company will have the right to supply bulk drug material to kissei for sale in its territory and will receive royalties or drug supply payments on future product sales , if any . in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 6.4 million , $ 7.3 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively , was recognized as revenue under this agreement . the $ 7.3 million of revenue recognized in 2005 includes a $ 2.5 million milestone paid upon kissei 2019s completion of regulatory filings in preparation for phase 1 clinical development of vx-702 in japan . p . employee benefits the company has a 401 ( k ) retirement plan ( the 201cvertex 401 ( k ) plan 201d ) in which substantially all of its permanent employees are eligible to participate . participants may contribute up to 60% ( 60 % ) of their annual compensation to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan , subject to statutory limitations . the company may declare discretionary matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan that are payable in the form of vertex common stock . the match is paid in the form of fully vested interests in a vertex common stock fund . employees have the ability to transfer funds from the company stock fund as they choose . the company declared matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan as follows ( in thousands ) : q . related party transactions as of december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , the company had a loan outstanding to a former officer of the company in the amount of $ 36000 , $ 36000 , $ 97000 , respectively , which was initially advanced in april 2002 . the loan balance is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . in 2001 , the company entered into a four year consulting agreement with a director of the company for the provision of part-time consulting services over a period of four years , at the rate of $ 80000 per year commencing in january 2002 . the consulting agreement terminated in january 2006 . r . contingencies the company has certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities . the company accrues a reserve for contingent liabilities when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31,</td><td>$ 3341</td><td>$ 2894</td><td>$ 2492</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issued during the year ended december 31,</td><td>91</td><td>215</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issuable as of the year ended december 31,</td><td>28</td><td>19</td><td>57</td></tr></table> discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31 , $ 3341 $ 2894 $ 2492 shares issued during the year ended december 31 , 91 215 239 shares issuable as of the year ended december 31 , 28 19 57 .\nQuestion: what was the total of share issuable in 2006?\nAnswer: 28.0\nQuestion: and what was that in 2005?\nAnswer: 19.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 9.0\nQuestion: what was the total of share issuable in 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "19.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3487	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin june 2011 , the fasb issued asu no . 2011-05 201ccomprehensive income 2013 presentation of comprehensive income . 201d asu 2011-05 requires comprehensive income , the components of net income , and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements . in both choices , an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income , each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income , and a total amount for comprehensive income . this update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity . the amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income . the amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2011 . the company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2012 . the adoption of asu 2011-05 is for presentation purposes only and had no material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at both december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2012 and prior years . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 24087 and $ 29554 in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2010 , respectively . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 , due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products have generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( \"fifo\" ) method . product cores are included as part of the company's merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company's other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , were $ 134258 and $ 126840 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at the end of fiscal 2012 and 2011 were as follows : december 29 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 292012</td><td>december 312011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 2182419</td><td>$ 1941055</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>126190</td><td>102103</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 2308609</td><td>$ 2043158</td></tr></table> inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company completes physical inventories and other targeted inventory counts in its store locations to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory in these locations . in its distribution centers and pdq aes , the company uses a cycle counting program to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and product core inventory . reserves advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 29 , 2012 , december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 ( in thousands , except per share data ) .\nQuestion: what was the value of fifo inventories at the end of 2012?\nAnswer: 2182419.0\nQuestion: what was the value at the end of 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1941055.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4244	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nresults of operations and the estimated fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities are recorded in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition . pro forma results of operations for the business combinations completed during fiscal 2016 have not been presented because the effects of these acquisitions , individually and in the aggregate , would not have been material to cadence 2019s financial results . the fair values of acquired intangible assets and assumed liabilities were determined using significant inputs that are not observable in the market . for an additional description of these fair value calculations , see note 16 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements . a trust for the benefit of the children of lip-bu tan , cadence 2019s president , chief executive officer , or ceo , and director , owned less than 2% ( 2 % ) of rocketick technologies ltd. , one of the acquired companies , and mr . tan and his wife serve as co-trustees of the trust and disclaim pecuniary and economic interest in the trust . the board of directors of cadence reviewed the transaction and concluded that it was in the best interests of cadence to proceed with the transaction . mr . tan recused himself from the board of directors 2019 discussion of the valuation of rocketick technologies ltd . and on whether to proceed with the transaction . a financial advisor provided a fairness opinion to cadence in connection with the transaction . 2014 acquisitions during fiscal 2014 , cadence acquired jasper design automation , inc. , or jasper , a privately held provider of formal analysis solutions based in mountain view , california . the acquired technology complements cadence 2019s existing system design and verification platforms . total cash consideration for jasper , after taking into account adjustments for certain costs , and cash held by jasper at closing of $ 28.7 million , was $ 139.4 million . cadence will also make payments to certain employees through the third quarter of fiscal 2017 subject to continued employment and other conditions . cadence also completed two other business combinations during fiscal 2014 for total cash consideration of $ 27.5 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 2.1 million . acquisition-related transaction costs transaction costs associated with acquisitions were $ 1.1 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 3.7 million during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . these costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in cadence 2019s consolidated income statements . note 8 . goodwill and acquired intangibles goodwill the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2016 and 2015 were as follows : gross carrying amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>gross carryingamount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 3 2015</td><td>$ 553767</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>-1995 ( 1995 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of january 2 2016</td><td>551772</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>goodwill resulting from acquisitions</td><td>23579</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>-2587 ( 2587 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2016</td><td>$ 572764</td></tr></table> cadence completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 and determined that the fair value of cadence 2019s single reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount of its net assets and that no impairment existed. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in gross carrying amount between the beginning of 2015 and the end of 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "18997.0" } ]
CONVFINQA475	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfinancial statement impact we believe that our accruals for sales returns , rebates , and discounts are reasonable and appropriate based on current facts and circumstances . our global rebate and discount liabilities are included in sales rebates and discounts on our consolidated balance sheet . our global sales return liability is included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . as of december 31 , 2018 , a 5 percent change in our global sales return , rebate , and discount liability would have led to an approximate $ 275 million effect on our income before income taxes . the portion of our global sales return , rebate , and discount liability resulting from sales of our products in the u.s . was approximately 90 percent as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 . the following represents a roll-forward of our most significant u.s . pharmaceutical sales return , rebate , and discount liability balances , including managed care , medicare , and medicaid: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales return rebate and discount liabilities beginning of year</td><td>$ 4172.0</td><td>$ 3601.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reduction of net sales due to sales returns discounts and rebates ( 1 )</td><td>12529.6</td><td>10603.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash payments of discounts and rebates</td><td>-12023.4 ( 12023.4 )</td><td>-10033.2 ( 10033.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sales return rebate and discount liabilities end of year</td><td>$ 4678.2</td><td>$ 4172.0</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) adjustments of the estimates for these returns , rebates , and discounts to actual results were approximately 1 percent of consolidated net sales for each of the years presented . product litigation liabilities and other contingencies background and uncertainties product litigation liabilities and other contingencies are , by their nature , uncertain and based upon complex judgments and probabilities . the factors we consider in developing our product litigation liability reserves and other contingent liability amounts include the merits and jurisdiction of the litigation , the nature and the number of other similar current and past matters , the nature of the product and the current assessment of the science subject to the litigation , and the likelihood of settlement and current state of settlement discussions , if any . in addition , we accrue for certain product liability claims incurred , but not filed , to the extent we can formulate a reasonable estimate of their costs based primarily on historical claims experience and data regarding product usage . we accrue legal defense costs expected to be incurred in connection with significant product liability contingencies when both probable and reasonably estimable . we also consider the insurance coverage we have to diminish the exposure for periods covered by insurance . in assessing our insurance coverage , we consider the policy coverage limits and exclusions , the potential for denial of coverage by the insurance company , the financial condition of the insurers , and the possibility of and length of time for collection . due to a very restrictive market for product liability insurance , we are self-insured for product liability losses for all our currently marketed products . in addition to insurance coverage , we also consider any third-party indemnification to which we are entitled or under which we are obligated . with respect to our third-party indemnification rights , these considerations include the nature of the indemnification , the financial condition of the indemnifying party , and the possibility of and length of time for collection . the litigation accruals and environmental liabilities and the related estimated insurance recoverables have been reflected on a gross basis as liabilities and assets , respectively , on our consolidated balance sheets . impairment of indefinite-lived and long-lived assets background and uncertainties we review the carrying value of long-lived assets ( both intangible and tangible ) for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset ( or asset group ) may not be recoverable . we identify impairment by comparing the projected undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset ( or asset group ) to its carrying value . if an impairment is identified , a loss is recorded equal to the excess of the asset 2019s net book value over its fair value , and the cost basis is adjusted . goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . when required , a comparison of fair value to the carrying amount of assets is performed to determine the amount of any impairment. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of u.s . pharmaceutical sales return, rebate, and discount liability balances, including managed care, medicare, and medicaid from 2017 to 2018?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "506.2" } ]
CONVFINQA7854	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\napproximately $ 55 million , which is reported as 201cinvestments 201d in the consolidated balance sheet and as 201cpurchases of marketable securities and investments 201d in the consolidated statement of cash flows . the recovery of approximately $ 25 million of this investment in 2007 reduced 201cinvestments 201d and is shown in cash flows within 201cproceeds from sale of marketable securities and investments . 201d this investment is discussed in more detail under the preceding section entitled industrial and transportation business . additional purchases of investments include additional survivor benefit insurance and equity investments . cash flows from financing activities : years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>change in short-term debt 2014 net</td><td>$ -1222 ( 1222 )</td><td>$ 882</td><td>$ -258 ( 258 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>repayment of debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>-1580 ( 1580 )</td><td>-440 ( 440 )</td><td>-656 ( 656 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>4024</td><td>693</td><td>429</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total cash change in debt</td><td>$ 1222</td><td>$ 1135</td><td>$ -485 ( 485 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchases of treasury stock</td><td>-3239 ( 3239 )</td><td>-2351 ( 2351 )</td><td>-2377 ( 2377 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reissuances of treasury stock</td><td>796</td><td>523</td><td>545</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends paid to stockholders</td><td>-1380 ( 1380 )</td><td>-1376 ( 1376 )</td><td>-1286 ( 1286 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation</td><td>74</td><td>60</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>distributions to minority interests and other 2014 net</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>$ -2547 ( 2547 )</td><td>$ -2061 ( 2061 )</td><td>$ -3625 ( 3625 )</td></tr></table> total debt at december 31 , 2007 , was $ 4.920 billion , up from $ 3.553 billion at year-end 2006 . the net change in short-term debt is primarily due to commercial paper activity . in 2007 , the repayment of debt for maturities greater than 90 days is primarily comprised of commercial paper repayments of approximately $ 1.15 billion and the november 2007 redemption of approximately $ 322 million in convertible notes . in 2007 , proceeds from debt included long-term debt and commercial paper issuances totaling approximately $ 4 billion . this was comprised of eurobond issuances in december 2007 and july 2007 totaling approximately $ 1.5 billion in u.s . dollars , a march 2007 long-term debt issuance of $ 750 million and a december 2007 fixed rate note issuance of $ 500 million , plus commercial paper issuances ( maturities greater than 90 days ) of approximately $ 1.25 billion . increases in long-term debt have been used , in part , to fund share repurchase activities . the company accelerated purchases of treasury stock when compared to prior years , buying back $ 3.2 billion in shares in 2007 . total debt was 30% ( 30 % ) of total capital ( total capital is defined as debt plus equity ) , compared with 26% ( 26 % ) at year-end 2006 . debt securities , including 2007 debt issuances , the company 2019s shelf registration , dealer remarketable securities and convertible notes , are all discussed in more detail in note 10 . the company has a \"well-known seasoned issuer\" shelf registration statement , effective february 24 , 2006 , to register an indeterminate amount of debt or equity securities for future sales . on june 15 , 2007 , the company registered 150718 shares of the company's common stock under this shelf on behalf of and for the sole benefit of the selling stockholders in connection with the company's acquisition of assets of diamond productions , inc . the company intends to use the proceeds from future securities sales off this shelf for general corporate purposes . in connection with this shelf registration , in june 2007 the company established a medium-term notes program through which up to $ 3 billion of medium-term notes may be offered . in december 2007 , 3m issued a five-year , $ 500 million , fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 4.65% ( 4.65 % ) under this medium-term notes program . this program has a remaining capacity of $ 2.5 billion as of december 31 , 2007 . the company 2019s $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities ( classified as current portion of long-term debt ) were remarketed for one year in december 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities ( final maturity 2010 ) and $ 62 million of floating rate notes ( final maturity 2044 ) are classified as current portion of long- term debt as the result of put provisions associated with these debt instruments . the company has convertible notes with a book value of $ 222 million at december 31 , 2007 . the next put option date for these convertible notes is november 2012 . in november 2007 , 364598 outstanding bonds were redeemed resulting in a payout from 3m of approximately $ 322 million . repurchases of common stock are made to support the company 2019s stock-based employee compensation plans and for other corporate purposes . in february 2007 , 3m 2019s board of directors authorized a two-year share repurchase of up to $ 7.0 billion for the period from february 12 , 2007 to february 28 , 2009 . as of december 31 , 2007 , approximately $ 4.1 billion remained available for repurchase . refer to the table titled 201cissuer purchases of equity securities 201d in part ii , item 5 , for more information. .\nQuestion: what was the debt amount in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.92" } ]
CONVFINQA5894	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis j.p . morgan chase & co . 26 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report $ 41.7 billion . nii was reduced by a lower volume of commercial loans and lower spreads on investment securities . as a compo- nent of nii , trading-related net interest income of $ 2.1 billion was up 13% ( 13 % ) from 2002 due to a change in the composition of , and growth in , trading assets . the firm 2019s total average interest-earning assets in 2003 were $ 590 billion , up 6% ( 6 % ) from the prior year . the net interest yield on these assets , on a fully taxable-equivalent basis , was 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) , compared with 2.09% ( 2.09 % ) in the prior year . noninterest expense year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation expense</td><td>$ 11695</td><td>$ 10983</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>occupancy expense</td><td>1912</td><td>1606</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>technology and communications expense</td><td>2844</td><td>2554</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other expense</td><td>5137</td><td>5111</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>surety settlement and litigation reserve</td><td>100</td><td>1300</td><td>-92 ( 92 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>merger and restructuring costs</td><td>2014</td><td>1210</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total noninterest expense</td><td>$ 21688</td><td>$ 22764</td><td>( 5 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> technology and communications expense in 2003 , technology and communications expense was 11% ( 11 % ) above the prior-year level . the increase was primarily due to a shift in expenses : costs that were previously associated with compensation and other expenses shifted , upon the commence- ment of the ibm outsourcing agreement , to technology and communications expense . also contributing to the increase were higher costs related to software amortization . for a further dis- cussion of the ibm outsourcing agreement , see support units and corporate on page 44 of this annual report . other expense other expense in 2003 rose slightly from the prior year , reflecting higher outside services . for a table showing the components of other expense , see note 8 on page 96 of this annual report . surety settlement and litigation reserve the firm added $ 100 million to the enron-related litigation reserve in 2003 to supplement a $ 900 million reserve initially recorded in 2002 . the 2002 reserve was established to cover enron-related matters , as well as certain other material litigation , proceedings and investigations in which the firm is involved . in addition , in 2002 the firm recorded a charge of $ 400 million for the settlement of enron-related surety litigation . merger and restructuring costs merger and restructuring costs related to business restructurings announced after january 1 , 2002 , were recorded in their relevant expense categories . in 2002 , merger and restructuring costs of $ 1.2 billion , for programs announced prior to january 1 , 2002 , were viewed by management as nonoperating expenses or 201cspecial items . 201d refer to note 8 on pages 95 201396 of this annual report for a further discussion of merger and restructuring costs and for a summary , by expense category and business segment , of costs incurred in 2003 and 2002 for programs announced after january 1 , 2002 . provision for credit losses the 2003 provision for credit losses was $ 2.8 billion lower than in 2002 , primarily reflecting continued improvement in the quality of the commercial loan portfolio and a higher volume of credit card securitizations . for further information about the provision for credit losses and the firm 2019s management of credit risk , see the dis- cussions of net charge-offs associated with the commercial and consumer loan portfolios and the allowance for credit losses , on pages 63 201365 of this annual report . income tax expense income tax expense was $ 3.3 billion in 2003 , compared with $ 856 million in 2002 . the effective tax rate in 2003 was 33% ( 33 % ) , compared with 34% ( 34 % ) in 2002 . the tax rate decline was principally attributable to changes in the proportion of income subject to state and local taxes . compensation expense compensation expense in 2003 was 6% ( 6 % ) higher than in the prior year . the increase principally reflected higher performance-related incentives , and higher pension and other postretirement benefit costs , primarily as a result of changes in actuarial assumptions . for a detailed discussion of pension and other postretirement benefit costs , see note 6 on pages 89 201393 of this annual report . the increase pertaining to incentives included $ 266 million as a result of adopting sfas 123 , and $ 120 million from the reversal in 2002 of previously accrued expenses for certain forfeitable key employ- ee stock awards , as discussed in note 7 on pages 93 201395 of this annual report . total compensation expense declined as a result of the transfer , beginning april 1 , 2003 , of 2800 employees to ibm in connection with a technology outsourcing agreement . the total number of full-time equivalent employees at december 31 , 2003 was 93453 compared with 94335 at the prior year-end . occupancy expense occupancy expense of $ 1.9 billion rose 19% ( 19 % ) from 2002 . the increase reflected costs of additional leased space in midtown manhattan and in the south and southwest regions of the united states ; higher real estate taxes in new york city ; and the cost of enhanced safety measures . also contributing to the increase were charges for unoccupied excess real estate of $ 270 million ; this compared with $ 120 million in 2002 , mostly in the third quarter of that year. .\nQuestion: what was the return on interest bearing assets in percentage, in 2003?\nAnswer: 2.1\nQuestion: and how much is that numerically?\nAnswer: 0.021\nQuestion: what was the pre-tax interest income in 2003?\nAnswer: 590.0\nQuestion: what is, then, the amount of this income that is represented by that return?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12.39" } ]
CONVFINQA5508	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in cash from operations from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: 227.0\nQuestion: what is the cash from operations in 2008?\nAnswer: 641.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.35413\nQuestion: what about the cash from operations in 2010?\nAnswer: 1151.0\nQuestion: and in 2009?\nAnswer: 868.0\nQuestion: what is the net change from 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: 283.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.32604" } ]
CONVFINQA7120	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company ( b ) these reclassifications were recorded to interest expense and cost of products sold . additional details regarding the company's cash flow hedges are provided in note 13 . on august 25 , 2016 , in anticipation of proceeds to be received from the divestiture of the respiratory solutions business in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase ( \"asr\" ) agreement . subsequent to the end of the company's fiscal year 2016 and as per the terms of the asr agreement , the company received approximately 1.3 million shares of its common stock , which was recorded as a $ 220 million increase to common stock in treasury . note 4 2014 earnings per share the weighted average common shares used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share ( shares in thousands ) for the years ended september 30 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average common shares outstanding</td><td>212702</td><td>202537</td><td>193299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dilutive share equivalents from share-based plans</td><td>4834</td><td>4972</td><td>4410</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 2014 assuming dilution</td><td>217536</td><td>207509</td><td>197709</td></tr></table> average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 2014 assuming dilution 217536 207509 197709 upon closing the acquisition of carefusion corporation ( 201ccarefusion 201d ) on march 17 , 2015 , the company issued approximately 15.9 million of its common shares as part of the purchase consideration . additional disclosures regarding this acquisition are provided in note 9 . options to purchase shares of common stock are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share when their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect on the calculation . for the years ended september 30 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 there were no options to purchase shares of common stock which were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation. .\nQuestion: what are the number of outstanding shares in 2016?\nAnswer: 212702.0\nQuestion: what are the number of shares in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "202537.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5438	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 23.4 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 6.0 million primarily due to higher net revenue and higher other income , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher interest expense . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 555.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 554.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 97 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in the residential and commercial sectors and a decrease in sales volume in the unbilled sales period . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to the addition in 2011 of transmission investments that are subject to equalization . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 57.5 million in gross wholesale revenues due to an increase in sales to affiliated customers , partially offset by a decrease of $ 26.9 million in power management rider revenue . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power. .\nQuestion: what is the increase in net income in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "23.4" } ]
CONVFINQA5542	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nissuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding purchases of our common stock that were made by us during the fourth quarter of 2011 . period total number of shares purchased ( 2 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 2 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part ofpublicly announced plans or programs ( 1 )</td><td>maximum dollar value of shares that may yetbe purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2013 october 31</td><td>3228557</td><td>$ 58.52</td><td>3227800</td><td>$ 108</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 2013 november 30</td><td>1813994</td><td>$ 66.38</td><td>1618110</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 2013 december 31</td><td>475685</td><td>$ 64.68</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5518236</td><td>$ 61.64</td><td>4845910</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in may 2010 , our board of directors approved a $ 3.5 billion share repurchase program . we completed this program in the fourth quarter of 2011 . in total , we repurchased 49.2 million common shares for $ 3.5 billion , or $ 71.18 per share , under this program . ( 2 ) during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we repurchased 672326 shares from company employees for the payment of personal income tax withholdings resulting from restricted stock vesting and stock option exercises . such repurchases are in addition to the $ 3.5 billion repurchase program . under the devon energy corporation incentive savings plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) , eligible employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the devon stock fund ( the 201cstock fund 201d ) , which is administered by an independent trustee , fidelity management trust company . eligible employees purchased approximately 45000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the stock fund . we acquired the shares of our common stock sold under the plan through open-market purchases . we filed a registration statement on form s-8 on january 26 , 2012 registering any offers and sales of interests in the plan or the stock fund and of the underlying shares of our common stock purchased by plan participants after that date . similarly , under the devon canada corporation savings plan ( the 201ccanadian plan 201d ) , eligible canadian employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the canadian plan , which is administered by an independent trustee , sun life assurance company of canada . eligible canadian employees purchased approximately 9000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the canadian plan . we acquired the shares sold under the canadian plan through open-market purchases . these shares and any interest in the canadian plan were offered and sold in reliance on the exemptions for offers and sales of securities made outside of the u.s. , including under regulation s for offers and sales of securities to employees pursuant to an employee benefit plan established and administered in accordance with the law of a country other than the u.s. .\nQuestion: what was the average share price in november?\nAnswer: 66.38\nQuestion: what was the average share price in october?\nAnswer: 58.52\nQuestion: what is the net difference?\nAnswer: 7.86\nQuestion: what is the october price?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "58.52" } ]
CONVFINQA1833	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconcentration of credit risk credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted . the company believes the likelihood of incurring material losses due to concentration of credit risk is remote . the principal financial instruments subject to credit risk are as follows : cash and cash equivalents - the company maintains cash deposits with major banks , which from time to time may exceed insured limits . the possibility of loss related to financial condition of major banks has been deemed minimal . additionally , the company 2019s investment policy limits exposure to concentrations of credit risk and changes in market conditions . accounts receivable - a large number of customers in diverse industries and geographies , as well as the practice of establishing reasonable credit lines , limits credit risk . based on historical trends and experiences , the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate to cover potential credit risk losses . foreign currency and interest rate contracts and derivatives - exposure to credit risk is limited by internal policies and active monitoring of counterparty risks . in addition , the company uses a diversified group of major international banks and financial institutions as counterparties . the company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of these counterparties . cash and cash equivalents cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased . accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at their face amounts less an allowance for doubtful accounts . accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and generally do not bear interest . the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates . the company 2019s estimates include separately providing for customer balances based on specific circumstances and credit conditions , and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible . account balances are charged off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered . the company 2019s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of $ 15 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 and $ 14 million as of december 31 , 2013 . returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 81</td><td>$ 73</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>bad debt expense</td><td>26</td><td>23</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( a )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 81</td></tr></table> ( a ) other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits . inventory valuations inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market . certain u.s . inventory costs are determined on a last-in , first-out ( lifo ) basis . lifo inventories represented 39% ( 39 % ) and 37% ( 37 % ) of consolidated inventories as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . lifo inventories include certain legacy nalco u.s . inventory acquired at fair value as part of the nalco merger . all other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in , first-out ( fifo ) methods . inventory values at fifo , as shown in note 5 , approximate replacement during the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company improved estimates related to its inventory reserves and product costing , resulting in a net pre-tax charge of approximately $ 6 million . separately , the actions resulted in charge of $ 20.6 million related to inventory reserve calculations , partially offset by a gain of $ 14.5 million related to the capitalization of certain cost components into inventory . both of these items are reflected in note 3. .\nQuestion: what was the percent of lifo inventories as a percent of consolidated inventories as of december 31, 2015?\nAnswer: 39.0\nQuestion: and what was that in 2014?\nAnswer: 37.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the combined percent of lifo inventories as a percent of consolidated inventories for both years?\nAnswer: 76.0\nQuestion: and what is the average annual percent for that same period?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "38.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4468	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin connection with our assessment of impairment we recorded gross other-than-temporary impairment of $ 1.15 billion for 2009 , compared to $ 122 million for 2008 . of the total recorded , $ 227 million related to credit and was recognized in our consolidated statement of income . the remaining $ 928 million related to factors other than credit , more fully discussed below , and was recognized , net of related taxes , in oci in our consolidated statement of condition . the $ 227 million was composed of $ 151 million associated with expected credit losses , $ 54 million related to management 2019s decision to sell the impaired securities prior to their recovery in value , and $ 22 million related to adverse changes in the timing of expected future cash flows from the securities . the majority of the impairment losses related to non-agency securities collateralized by mortgages , for which management concluded had experienced credit losses based on the present value of the securities 2019 expected future cash flows . these securities are classified as asset-backed securities in the foregoing investment securities tables . as described in note 1 , management periodically reviews the fair values of investment securities to determine if other-than-temporary impairment has occurred . this review encompasses all investment securities and includes such quantitative factors as current and expected future interest rates and the length of time that a security 2019s cost basis has exceeded its fair value , and includes investment securities for which we have issuer- specific concerns regardless of quantitative factors . gains and losses related to investment securities were as follows for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross gains from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ 418</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross losses from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross losses from other-than-temporary impairment</td><td>-1155 ( 1155 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>losses not related to credit ( 1 )</td><td>928</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net impairment losses</td><td>-227 ( 227 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gains ( losses ) related to investment securities net</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ -54 ( 54 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) these losses were recognized as a component of oci ; see note 12 . we conduct periodic reviews to evaluate each security that is impaired . impairment exists when the current fair value of an individual security is below its amortized cost basis . for debt securities available for sale and held to maturity , other-than-temporary impairment is recorded in our consolidated statement of income when management intends to sell ( or may be required to sell ) securities before they recover in value , or when management expects the present value of cash flows expected to be collected to be less than the amortized cost of the impaired security ( a credit loss ) . our review of impaired securities generally includes : 2022 the identification and evaluation of securities that have indications of possible other-than-temporary impairment , such as issuer-specific concerns including deteriorating financial condition or bankruptcy ; 2022 the analysis of expected future cash flows of securities , based on quantitative and qualitative factors ; 2022 the analysis of the collectability of those future cash flows , including information about past events , current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts ; 2022 the analysis of individual impaired securities , including consideration of the length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position and the anticipated recovery period ; 2022 the discussion of evidential matter , including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual securities to be deemed other-than-temporarily impaired and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment ; and 2022 documentation of the results of these analyses . factors considered in determining whether impairment is other than temporary include : 2022 the length of time the security has been impaired; .\nQuestion: what was the gross gains from sales of available for sale securities in 2009?\nAnswer: 418.0\nQuestion: and in 2008?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: so what was the change in value between these two years?\nAnswer: 318.0\nQuestion: and the value for 2008 again?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "100.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2188	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co . / 2007 annual report 117 nonrecurring fair value changes the following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for which a fair value adjustment has been included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2007 , related to financial instruments held at december 31 , 2007 . year ended december 31 , 2007 ( in millions ) 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 2007 ( in millions )</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans</td><td>$ -720 ( 720 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other assets</td><td>-161 ( 161 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accounts payable accrued expense and other liabilities</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total nonrecurring fair value gains ( losses )</td><td>$ -879 ( 879 )</td></tr></table> in the above table , loans principally include changes in fair value for loans carried on the balance sheet at the lower of cost or fair value ; and accounts payable , accrued expense and other liabilities principally includes the change in fair value for unfunded lending-related commitments within the leveraged lending portfolio . level 3 assets analysis level 3 assets ( including assets measured at the lower of cost or fair value ) were 5% ( 5 % ) of total firm assets at december 31 , 2007 . these assets increased during 2007 principally during the second half of the year , when liquidity in mortgages and other credit products fell dra- matically . the increase was primarily due to an increase in leveraged loan balances within level 3 as the ability of the firm to syndicate this risk to third parties became limited by the credit environment . in addi- tion , there were transfers from level 2 to level 3 during 2007 . these transfers were principally for instruments within the mortgage market where inputs which are significant to their valuation became unob- servable during the year . subprime and alt-a whole loans , subprime home equity securities , commercial mortgage-backed mezzanine loans and credit default swaps referenced to asset-backed securities consti- tuted the majority of the affected instruments , reflecting a significant decline in liquidity in these instruments in the third and fourth quarters of 2007 , as new issue activity was nonexistent and independent pric- ing information was no longer available for these assets . transition in connection with the initial adoption of sfas 157 , the firm recorded the following on january 1 , 2007 : 2022 a cumulative effect increase to retained earnings of $ 287 million , primarily related to the release of profit previously deferred in accordance with eitf 02-3 ; 2022 an increase to pretax income of $ 166 million ( $ 103 million after-tax ) related to the incorporation of the firm 2019s creditworthiness in the valuation of liabilities recorded at fair value ; and 2022 an increase to pretax income of $ 464 million ( $ 288 million after-tax ) related to valuations of nonpublic private equity investments . prior to the adoption of sfas 157 , the firm applied the provisions of eitf 02-3 to its derivative portfolio . eitf 02-3 precluded the recogni- tion of initial trading profit in the absence of : ( a ) quoted market prices , ( b ) observable prices of other current market transactions or ( c ) other observable data supporting a valuation technique . in accor- dance with eitf 02-3 , the firm recognized the deferred profit in principal transactions revenue on a systematic basis ( typically straight- line amortization over the life of the instruments ) and when observ- able market data became available . prior to the adoption of sfas 157 the firm did not incorporate an adjustment into the valuation of liabilities carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet . commencing january 1 , 2007 , in accor- dance with the requirements of sfas 157 , an adjustment was made to the valuation of liabilities measured at fair value to reflect the credit quality of the firm . prior to the adoption of sfas 157 , privately held investments were initially valued based upon cost . the carrying values of privately held investments were adjusted from cost to reflect both positive and neg- ative changes evidenced by financing events with third-party capital providers . the investments were also subject to ongoing impairment reviews by private equity senior investment professionals . the increase in pretax income related to nonpublic private equity investments in connection with the adoption of sfas 157 was due to there being sufficient market evidence to support an increase in fair values using the sfas 157 methodology , although there had not been an actual third-party market transaction related to such investments . financial disclosures required by sfas 107 sfas 107 requires disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments and the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate their fair values . many but not all of the financial instruments held by the firm are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets . financial instruments within the scope of sfas 107 that are not carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are discussed below . additionally , certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are excluded from the scope of sfas 107 . accordingly , the fair value disclosures required by sfas 107 provide only a partial estimate of the fair value of jpmorgan chase . for example , the firm has developed long-term relationships with its customers through its deposit base and credit card accounts , commonly referred to as core deposit intangibles and credit card relationships . in the opinion of management , these items , in the aggregate , add significant value to jpmorgan chase , but their fair value is not disclosed in this note . financial instruments for which fair value approximates carrying value certain financial instruments that are not carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are carried at amounts that approxi- mate fair value due to their short-term nature and generally negligi- ble credit risk . these instruments include cash and due from banks , deposits with banks , federal funds sold , securities purchased under resale agreements with short-dated maturities , securities borrowed , short-term receivables and accrued interest receivable , commercial paper , federal funds purchased , securities sold under repurchase agreements with short-dated maturities , other borrowed funds , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . in addition , sfas 107 requires that the fair value for deposit liabilities with no stated matu- rity ( i.e. , demand , savings and certain money market deposits ) be equal to their carrying value . sfas 107 does not allow for the recog- nition of the inherent funding value of these instruments. .\nQuestion: what is the increase to pretax income of 2022 in million?\nAnswer: 166.0\nQuestion: and that in million after-tax?\nAnswer: 103.0\nQuestion: how much does that increase in million represents in relation to that in million after-tax?\nAnswer: 1.61165\nQuestion: what is the increase to pretax income of 2022 in million?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "166.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2212	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n13 . rentals and leases the company leases sales and administrative office facilities , distribution centers , research and manufacturing facilities , as well as vehicles and other equipment under operating leases . total rental expense under the company 2019s operating leases was $ 239 million in 2017 and $ 221 million in both 2016 and 2015 . as of december 31 , 2017 , identifiable future minimum payments with non-cancelable terms in excess of one year were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 131</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>115</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 617</td></tr></table> the company enters into operating leases for vehicles whose non-cancelable terms are one year or less in duration with month-to-month renewal options . these leases have been excluded from the table above . the company estimates payments under such leases will approximate $ 62 million in 2018 . these vehicle leases have guaranteed residual values that have historically been satisfied by the proceeds on the sale of the vehicles . 14 . research and development expenditures research expenditures that relate to the development of new products and processes , including significant improvements and refinements to existing products , are expensed as incurred . such costs were $ 201 million in 2017 , $ 189 million in 2016 and $ 191 million in 2015 . the company did not participate in any material customer sponsored research during 2017 , 2016 or 2015 . 15 . commitments and contingencies the company is subject to various claims and contingencies related to , among other things , workers 2019 compensation , general liability ( including product liability ) , automobile claims , health care claims , environmental matters and lawsuits . the company is also subject to various claims and contingencies related to income taxes , which are discussed in note 12 . the company also has contractual obligations including lease commitments , which are discussed in note 13 . the company records liabilities where a contingent loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated . if the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range , the company records the most probable estimate of the loss or the minimum amount when no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount . the company discloses a contingent liability even if the liability is not probable or the amount is not estimable , or both , if there is a reasonable possibility that a material loss may have been incurred . insurance globally , the company has insurance policies with varying deductibility levels for property and casualty losses . the company is insured for losses in excess of these deductibles , subject to policy terms and conditions and has recorded both a liability and an offsetting receivable for amounts in excess of these deductibles . the company is self-insured for health care claims for eligible participating employees , subject to certain deductibles and limitations . the company determines its liabilities for claims on an actuarial basis . litigation and environmental matters the company and certain subsidiaries are party to various lawsuits , claims and environmental actions that have arisen in the ordinary course of business . these include from time to time antitrust , commercial , patent infringement , product liability and wage hour lawsuits , as well as possible obligations to investigate and mitigate the effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain chemical substances at various sites , such as superfund sites and other operating or closed facilities . the company has established accruals for certain lawsuits , claims and environmental matters . the company currently believes that there is not a reasonably possible risk of material loss in excess of the amounts accrued related to these legal matters . because litigation is inherently uncertain , and unfavorable rulings or developments could occur , there can be no certainty that the company may not ultimately incur charges in excess of recorded liabilities . a future adverse ruling , settlement or unfavorable development could result in future charges that could have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s results of operations or cash flows in the period in which they are recorded . the company currently believes that such future charges related to suits and legal claims , if any , would not have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position . environmental matters the company is currently participating in environmental assessments and remediation at approximately 45 locations , the majority of which are in the u.s. , and environmental liabilities have been accrued reflecting management 2019s best estimate of future costs . potential insurance reimbursements are not anticipated in the company 2019s accruals for environmental liabilities. .\nQuestion: what was the variation in the r&d expenses from 2016 to 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5501	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfor the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>1.85% ( 1.85 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>26.50</td><td>28.70</td><td>27.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.60</td><td>4.19</td><td>3.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>7.8</td><td>7.8</td><td>5.0</td></tr></table> compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\\\fc\\\\delivery_1024177\\\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .\nQuestion: what was the risk-free interest rate in 2005?\nAnswer: 4.19\nQuestion: and in 2004?\nAnswer: 3.02\nQuestion: so what was the difference between these two years?\nAnswer: 1.17\nQuestion: and the value for 2004 again?\nAnswer: 3.02\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change in this value over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.38742" } ]
CONVFINQA10834	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntransfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2014 to december 31 , 2014 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>5854930</td><td>$ 18.93</td><td>5849517</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>4266</td><td>$ 20.29</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>826744</td><td>$ 19.67</td><td>826639</td><td>$ 143559758</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6685940</td><td>$ 19.02</td><td>6676156</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 5413 withheld shares in october 2014 , 4266 withheld shares in november 2014 and 105 withheld shares in december 2014 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2014 , the board authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2014 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2014 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .\nQuestion: what portion of total stock repurchases occurred during october 2014?\nAnswer: 0.87571\nQuestion: what is the net change in the number of shares repurchased during october and november?\nAnswer: 5850664.0\nQuestion: what fraction does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.99927\nQuestion: what about the percentage change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "99.92714" } ]
CONVFINQA5786	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbacklog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to higher orders on f-35 and c-130 programs . backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 due to increased volume on the f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by decreased volume on the f-16 program . operating profit is also expected to increase in the low single-digit percentage range , driven by increased volume on the f-35 program offset by contract mix that results in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs 2019 technical services business provides a comprehensive portfolio of technical and sustainment services . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5596</td><td>$ 5654</td><td>$ 6115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>508</td><td>472</td><td>498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>8.3% ( 8.3 % )</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 4800</td><td>$ 6000</td><td>$ 6300</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 58 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 395 million as a result of key program completions , lower customer funding levels and increased competition , coupled with the fragmentation of existing large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price when re-competed ( including cms-citic ) . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 230 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 110 million due to the start-up of new programs and growth in recently awarded programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit increased $ 36 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to improved program performance and risk retirements , offset by decreased operating profit resulting from the activities mentioned above for net sales . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 70 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 461 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 475 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to decreased volume in technical services programs reflecting market pressures . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of about $ 330 million due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 26 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to the activities mentioned above for sales , partially offset by severance recoveries related to the restructuring announced in november 2013 of approximately $ 20 million in 2014 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were comparable in 2014 and 2013. .\nQuestion: what is the backlog at year-end of 2014?\nAnswer: 6000.0\nQuestion: and that of 2013?\nAnswer: 6300.0\nQuestion: what is the difference between the backlog at year-end of 2014 and 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-300.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8414	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nissuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2007 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number ofshares purchased</td><td>average pricepaid pershare</td><td>total number of sharespurchased as part ofpubliclyannouncedprogram ( a )</td><td>maximum number ofshares that may yet bepurchased under theprogram ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october</td><td>127100</td><td>$ 108.58</td><td>127100</td><td>35573131</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november</td><td>1504300</td><td>109.07</td><td>1504300</td><td>34068831</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december</td><td>1325900</td><td>108.78</td><td>1325900</td><td>32742931</td></tr></table> ( a ) we repurchased a total of 2957300 shares of our common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2002 . ( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to 128 million shares of our common stock from time-to-time , including 20 million shares approved for repurchase by our board of directors in september 2007 . under the program , management has discretion to determine the number and price of the shares to be repurchased , and the timing of any repurchases , in compliance with applicable law and regulation . as of december 31 , 2007 , we had repurchased a total of 95.3 million shares under the program . in 2007 , we did not make any unregistered sales of equity securities. .\nQuestion: what was the amount of approved share purchases in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "128.0" } ]
CONVFINQA335	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents in march 2008 , the fasb issued sfas no . 161 , disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities 2014an amendment of fasb statement no . 133 , which requires companies to provide additional disclosures about its objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments , how the derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under sfas no . 133 , accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , and related interpretations , and how the derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the company 2019s financial statements . sfas no . 161 also requires companies to disclose information about credit risk-related contingent features in their hedged positions . sfas no . 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after november 15 , 2008 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 161 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the three fiscal years ended september 27 , 2008 ( in millions ) : as of september 27 , 2008 , the company had $ 24.5 billion in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments , an increase of $ 9.1 billion from september 29 , 2007 . the principal components of this net increase were cash generated by operating activities of $ 9.6 billion , proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock plans of $ 483 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $ 757 million . these increases were partially offset by payments for acquisitions of property , plant , and equipment of $ 1.1 billion , payments made in connection with business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 220 million and payments for acquisitions of intangible assets of $ 108 million . the company 2019s cash generated by operating activities significantly exceeded its net income due primarily to the large increase in deferred revenue , net of deferred costs , associated with subscription accounting for iphone . the company 2019s short-term investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly rated securities with a minimum rating of single-a . as of september 27 , 2008 and september 29 , 2007 , $ 11.3 billion and $ 6.5 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , and short- term investments were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company had $ 117 million in net unrealized losses on its investment portfolio , primarily related to investments with stated maturities ranging from one to five years , as of september 27 , 2008 , and net unrealized losses of approximately $ 11 million on its investment portfolio , primarily related to investments with stated maturities from one to five years , as of september 29 , 2007 . the company has the intent and ability to hold such investments for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery of the principal amounts invested . accordingly , none of these declines in fair value were recognized in the company 2019s statement of operations . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital expenditures , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . capital assets the company 2019s cash payments for capital asset purchases were $ 1.1 billion during 2008 , consisting of $ 389 million for retail store facilities and $ 702 million for real estate acquisitions and corporate infrastructure including information systems enhancements . the company anticipates utilizing approximately $ 1.5 billion for capital asset purchases during 2009 , including approximately $ 400 million for retail facilities and approximately $ 1.1 billion for corporate facilities and infrastructure. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and short-term investments</td><td>$ 24490</td><td>$ 15386</td><td>$ 10110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 2422</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventory</td><td>$ 509</td><td>$ 346</td><td>$ 270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 20598</td><td>$ 12676</td><td>$ 8066</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 9596</td><td>$ 5470</td><td>$ 2220</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments between 2007 and 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9104.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3233	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the \"2010 credit agreement\" ) which was subsequently terminated in july 2012 . the 2010 credit agreement provided for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into the 2010 credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the 2010 credit agreement was set to terminate on august 5 , 2013 . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 705 million of which $ 34 million was used as of december 31 , 2012 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 2.27% ( 2.27 % ) as of dec . 31 2012 and 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of december 31 2011</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2012 , total indebtedness was 42% ( 42 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 219 million , $ 212 million and $ 189 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . rental expense for operating leases was $ 233 million , $ 249 million and $ 233 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , are ( in millions ) $ 171 in 2013 , $ 135 in 2014 , $ 107 in 2015 , $ 83 in 2016 , $ 64 in 2017 and $ 135 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds of $ 119 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , guarantees outstanding were $ 96 million and $ 90 million , respectively . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 11 million and $ 13 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 11 million and $ 21 million , as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the fair value of each guarantee was estimated by comparing the net present value of two hypothetical cash flow streams , one based on ppg 2019s incremental borrowing rate and the other based on the borrower 2019s incremental borrowing rate , as of the effective date of the guarantee . both streams were discounted at a risk free rate of return . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit , surety bonds or guarantees is likely . 9 . fair value measurement the accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a hierarchy with three levels of inputs used to determine fair value . level 1 inputs are quoted prices ( unadjusted ) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities , are considered to be the most reliable evidence of fair value , and should be used whenever available . level 2 inputs are observable prices that are not quoted on active exchanges . level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs employed for measuring the fair value of assets or liabilities . table of contents notes to the consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2012, what was the remaining amount the company had in its restrictive covenant regarding debt to total capitalization?\nAnswer: 0.18\nQuestion: in this same year, what was the amount of the outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds, in millions?\nAnswer: 119.0\nQuestion: and what was that for the guarantees outstanding?\nAnswer: 96.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the full amount of both categories, in millions of dollars?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "215.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9499	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconduit assets by asset origin . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in billions )</td><td>2008 amount</td><td>2008 percent of total conduit assets</td><td>2008 amount</td><td>percent of total conduit assets</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 11.09</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td><td>$ 12.14</td><td>42% ( 42 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>australia</td><td>4.30</td><td>17</td><td>6.10</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>great britain</td><td>1.97</td><td>8</td><td>2.93</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>spain</td><td>1.71</td><td>7</td><td>1.90</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>italy</td><td>1.66</td><td>7</td><td>1.86</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>portugal</td><td>0.62</td><td>3</td><td>0.70</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>germany</td><td>0.57</td><td>3</td><td>0.70</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>netherlands</td><td>0.40</td><td>2</td><td>0.55</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>belgium</td><td>0.29</td><td>1</td><td>0.31</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>greece</td><td>0.27</td><td>1</td><td>0.31</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other</td><td>1.01</td><td>5</td><td>1.26</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total conduit assets</td><td>$ 23.89</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 28.76</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> the conduits meet the definition of a vie , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) . we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the conduits , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) , and do not record them in our consolidated financial statements . we hold no direct or indirect ownership interest in the conduits , but we provide subordinated financial support to them through contractual arrangements . standby letters of credit absorb certain actual credit losses from the conduit assets ; our commitment under these letters of credit totaled $ 1.00 billion and $ 1.04 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . liquidity asset purchase agreements provide liquidity to the conduits in the event they cannot place commercial paper in the ordinary course of their business ; these facilities , which require us to purchase assets from the conduits at par , would provide the needed liquidity to repay maturing commercial paper if there was a disruption in the asset-backed commercial paper market . the aggregate commitment under the liquidity asset purchase agreements was approximately $ 23.59 billion and $ 28.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we did not accrue for any losses associated with either our commitment under the standby letters of credit or the liquidity asset purchase agreements in our consolidated statement of condition at december 31 , 2008 or 2007 . during the first quarter of 2008 , pursuant to the contractual terms of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits , we were required to purchase $ 850 million of conduit assets . the purchase was the result of various factors , including the continued illiquidity in the commercial paper markets . the securities were purchased at prices determined in accordance with existing contractual terms in the liquidity asset purchase agreements , and which exceeded their fair value . accordingly , during the first quarter of 2008 , the securities were written down to their fair value through a $ 12 million reduction of processing fees and other revenue in our consolidated statement of income , and are carried at fair value in securities available for sale in our consolidated statement of condition . none of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits were drawn upon during the remainder of 2008 , and no draw-downs on the standby letters of credit occurred during 2008 . the conduits generally sell commercial paper to independent third-party investors . however , we sometimes purchase commercial paper from the conduits . as of december 31 , 2008 , we held an aggregate of approximately $ 230 million of commercial paper issued by the conduits , and $ 2 million at december 31 , 2007 . in addition , approximately $ 5.70 billion of u.s . conduit-issued commercial paper had been sold to the cpff . the cpff is scheduled to expire on october 31 , 2009 . the weighted-average maturity of the conduits 2019 commercial paper in the aggregate was approximately 25 days as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 20 days as of december 31 , 2007 . each of the conduits has issued first-loss notes to independent third parties , which third parties absorb first- dollar losses related to credit risk . aggregate first-loss notes outstanding at december 31 , 2008 for the four conduits totaled $ 67 million , compared to $ 32 million at december 31 , 2007 . actual credit losses of the conduits .\nQuestion: what was the total conduit asset in 2008?\nAnswer: 23.59\nQuestion: and what was it in 2007?\nAnswer: 28.37\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: -4.78\nQuestion: and what percentage does this change represent in relation to the 2007 total conduit asset?\nAnswer: -0.16849\nQuestion: and for the conduit assets only in the us, what was the change over that same period?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-1.05" } ]
CONVFINQA10366	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunallocated corporate items for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal year 2018</td><td>fiscal year 2017</td><td>fiscal year 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net gain ( loss ) onmark-to-marketvaluation of commodity positions</td><td>$ 14.3</td><td>$ -22.0 ( 22.0 )</td><td>$ -69.1 ( 69.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net loss on commodity positions reclassified from unallocated corporate items to segmentoperating profit</td><td>11.3</td><td>32.0</td><td>127.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>netmark-to-marketrevaluation of certain grain inventories</td><td>6.5</td><td>3.9</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>netmark-to-marketvaluation of certain commodity positions recognized in unallocated corporate items</td><td>$ 32.1</td><td>$ 13.9</td><td>$ 62.8</td></tr></table> net mark-to-market valuation of certain commodity positions recognized in unallocated corporate items $ 32.1 $ 13.9 $ 62.8 as of may 27 , 2018 , the net notional value of commodity derivatives was $ 238.8 million , of which $ 147.9 million related to agricultural inputs and $ 90.9 million related to energy inputs . these contracts relate to inputs that generally will be utilized within the next 12 months . interest rate risk we are exposed to interest rate volatility with regard to future issuances of fixed-rate debt , and existing and future issuances of floating-rate debt . primary exposures include u.s . treasury rates , libor , euribor , and commercial paper rates in the united states and europe . we use interest rate swaps , forward-starting interest rate swaps , and treasury locks to hedge our exposure to interest rate changes , to reduce the volatility of our financing costs , and to achieve a desired proportion of fixed rate versus floating-rate debt , based on current and projected market conditions . generally under these swaps , we agree with a counterparty to exchange the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts based on an agreed upon notional principal amount . floating interest rate exposures 2014 floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges , as are all hedges of forecasted issuances of debt . effectiveness is assessed based on either the perfectly effective hypothetical derivative method or changes in the present value of interest payments on the underlying debt . effective gains and losses deferred to aoci are reclassified into earnings over the life of the associated debt . ineffective gains and losses are recorded as net interest . the amount of hedge ineffectiveness was a $ 2.6 million loss in fiscal 2018 , and less than $ 1 million in fiscal 2017 and 2016 . fixed interest rate exposures 2014 fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges with effectiveness assessed based on changes in the fair value of the underlying debt and derivatives , using incremental borrowing rates currently available on loans with similar terms and maturities . ineffective gains and losses on these derivatives and the underlying hedged items are recorded as net interest . the amount of hedge ineffectiveness was a $ 3.4 million loss in fiscal 2018 , a $ 4.3 million gain in fiscal 2017 , and less than $ 1 million in fiscal 2016 . in advance of planned debt financing related to the acquisition of blue buffalo , we entered into $ 3800.0 million of treasury locks due april 19 , 2018 , with an average fixed rate of 2.9 percent , of which $ 2300.0 million were entered into in the third quarter of fiscal 2018 and $ 1500.0 million were entered into in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 . all of these treasury locks were cash settled for $ 43.9 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 , concurrent with the issuance of our $ 850.0 million 5.5-year fixed-rate notes , $ 800.0 million 7-year fixed- rate notes , $ 1400.0 million 10-year fixed-rate notes , $ 500.0 million 20-year fixed-rate notes , and $ 650.0 million 30-year fixed-rate notes . in advance of planned debt financing , in fiscal 2018 , we entered into $ 500.0 million of treasury locks due october 15 , 2017 with an average fixed rate of 1.8 percent . all of these treasury locks were cash settled for $ 3.7 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2018 , concurrent with the issuance of our $ 500.0 million 5-year fixed-rate notes. .\nQuestion: as of may 27, 2018, how much did the net notional value of commodity derivatives related to agricultural inputs represent in relation to the total of that net notional value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.61935" } ]
CONVFINQA8547	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements recognizing customer revenue , the company must assess the collectability of both the amounts billed and the portion recognized on a straight-line basis . this assessment takes customer credit risk and business and industry conditions into consideration to ultimately determine the collectability of the amounts billed . to the extent the amounts , based on management 2019s estimates , may not be collectible , recognition is deferred until such point as the uncertainty is resolved . any amounts which were previously recognized as revenue and subsequently determined to be uncollectible are charged to bad debt expense . accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts related to estimated losses resulting from a customer 2019s inability to make required payments and reserves for amounts invoiced whose collectability is not reasonably assured . these allowances are generally estimated based on payment patterns , days past due and collection history , and incorporate changes in economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical trends , such as customers in bankruptcy , liquidation or reorganization . receivables are written-off against the allowances when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1,</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td><td>$ 8850</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>16219</td><td>26771</td><td>12059</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recoveries and other</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td><td>-9733 ( 9733 )</td><td>-9427 ( 9427 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31,</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td></tr></table> the company 2019s largest international customer is iusacell , which is the brand name under which a group of companies controlled by grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201cgrupo iusacell 201d ) operates . iusacell represented approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the company 2019s total revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2010 . grupo iusacell has been engaged in a refinancing of a majority of its u.s . dollar denominated debt , and in connection with this process , two of the legal entities of the group , including grupo iusacell , voluntarily filed for a pre-packaged concurso mercantil ( a process substantially equivalent to chapter 11 of u.s . bankruptcy law ) with the backing of a majority of their financial creditors in december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , iusacell notes receivable , net , and related assets ( which include financing lease commitments and a deferred rent asset that are primarily long-term in nature ) were $ 19.7 million and $ 51.2 million , respectively . functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with its largest international customer , iusacell , which included , among other changes , converting all of iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company has determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional .\nQuestion: what is the balance of allowances at the end of 2010?\nAnswer: 22505.0\nQuestion: what about in 2009?\nAnswer: 28520.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: -6015.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: -0.2109\nQuestion: what is the value of iusacell notes receivable, net?\nAnswer: 19.7\nQuestion: what about the value of related assets?\nAnswer: 51.2\nQuestion: what ratio does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.38477" } ]
CONVFINQA9881	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions as a component of income tax expense and accounts for sales tax collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities on a net basis . allowance for funds used during construction afudc is a non-cash credit to income with a corresponding charge to utility plant that represents the cost of borrowed funds or a return on equity funds devoted to plant under construction . the regulated utility subsidiaries record afudc to the extent permitted by the pucs . the portion of afudc attributable to borrowed funds is shown as a reduction of interest , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . any portion of afudc attributable to equity funds would be included in other income ( expenses ) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . afudc is summarized in the following table for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowance for other funds used during construction</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>allowance for borrowed funds used during construction</td><td>8</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr></table> environmental costs the company 2019s water and wastewater operations are subject to u.s . federal , state , local and foreign requirements relating to environmental protection , and as such , the company periodically becomes subject to environmental claims in the normal course of business . environmental expenditures that relate to current operations or provide a future benefit are expensed or capitalized as appropriate . remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued , on an undiscounted basis , when it is probable that these costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated . remediation costs accrued amounted to $ 1 and $ 2 as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the accrual relates entirely to a conservation agreement entered into by a subsidiary of the company with the national oceanic and atmospheric administration ( 201cnoaa 201d ) requiring the company to , among other provisions , implement certain measures to protect the steelhead trout and its habitat in the carmel river watershed in the state of california . the company has agreed to pay $ 1 annually from 2010 to 2016 . the company 2019s inception-to-date costs related to the noaa agreement were recorded in regulatory assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 and are expected to be fully recovered from customers in future rates . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivative financial instruments for purposes of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates . these derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures . the company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments . all derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value . on the date the derivative contract is entered into , the company may designate the derivative as a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability ( fair-value hedge ) or a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability ( cash-flow hedge ) . changes in the fair value of a fair-value hedge , along with the gain or loss on the underlying hedged item , are recorded in current-period earnings . the effective portion of gains and losses on cash-flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income , until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows . any ineffective portion of designated hedges is recognized in current-period earnings . cash flows from derivative contracts are included in net cash provided by operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. .\nQuestion: what was the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction as a percentage of allowance for other funds used during construction in 2015?\nAnswer: 0.61538\nQuestion: what was the change in allowance for other funds used during construction between 2013 and 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-4.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3187	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 30 , 2010 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 21871</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>12322</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>9078</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>6381</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>5422</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>30655</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 85729</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees in 2010?\nAnswer: 11.7\nQuestion: what was the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees in 2009?\nAnswer: 10.9\nQuestion: what is the net change for the year?\nAnswer: 0.8\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.07339" } ]
CONVFINQA1523	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model for grants and the resulting weighted average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>intrinsic value</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 10</td><td>$ 18</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>exercise proceeds</td><td>7</td><td>11</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax benefit realized</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr></table> stock units during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company granted rsus to certain employees under the 2007 plan and 2017 omnibus plan , as applicable . rsus generally vest based on continued employment with the company over periods ranging from one to three years. .\nQuestion: what is the intrinsic value in 2018?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8563	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nselling , general , and administrative expenses selling , general , and administrative expenses increased to $ 65.2 million in 2010 from $ 52.9 million in 2009 due primarily to increases in compensation expense and recruitment costs , principally in connection with higher headcount in 2010 , and an increase in non-cash compensation expense for the reasons described above . cost of goods sold cost of goods sold in 2010 and 2009 was $ 2.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively , and consisted primarily of royalties and other period costs related to arcalyst ae commercial supplies . to date , arcalyst ae shipments to our customers have primarily consisted of supplies of inventory manufactured and expensed as research and development costs prior to fda approval in 2008 ; therefore , the costs of these supplies were not included in costs of goods sold . other income and expense investment income decreased to $ 2.1 million in 2010 from $ 4.5 million in 2009 , due primarily to lower yields on , and lower average balances of , cash and marketable securities . interest expense increased to $ 9.1 million in 2010 from $ 2.3 million in 2009 . interest expense is primarily attributable to the imputed interest portion of payments to our landlord , commencing in the third quarter of 2009 , to lease newly constructed laboratory and office facilities in tarrytown , new york . income tax expense ( benefit ) in 2010 , we did not recognize any income tax expense or benefit . in 2009 , we recognized a $ 4.1 million income tax benefit , consisting primarily of ( i ) $ 2.7 million resulting from a provision in the worker , homeownership , and business assistance act of 2009 that allowed us to claim a refund of u.s . federal alternative minimum tax that we paid in 2008 , and ( ii ) $ 0.7 million resulting from a provision in the american recovery and reinvestment act of 2009 that allowed us to claim a refund for a portion of our unused pre-2006 research tax credits . years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 net loss regeneron reported a net loss of $ 67.8 million , or $ 0.85 per share ( basic and diluted ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2009 , compared to a net loss of $ 79.1 million , or $ 1.00 per share ( basic and diluted ) for 2008 . the decrease in our net loss in 2009 was principally due to higher collaboration revenue in connection with our antibody collaboration with sanofi-aventis , receipt of a $ 20.0 million substantive performance milestone payment in connection with our vegf trap-eye collaboration with bayer healthcare , and higher arcalyst ae sales , partly offset by higher research and development expenses , as detailed below . revenues revenues in 2009 and 2008 consist of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>collaboration revenue</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>sanofi-aventis</td><td>$ 247.2</td><td>$ 154.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>bayer healthcare</td><td>67.3</td><td>31.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total collaboration revenue</td><td>314.5</td><td>185.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>technology licensing revenue</td><td>40.0</td><td>40.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net product sales</td><td>18.4</td><td>6.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>contract research and other revenue</td><td>6.4</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total revenue</td><td>$ 379.3</td><td>$ 238.5</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: in 2008, what percentage did bayer healthcare represent in relation to the total revenue?\nAnswer: 0.13082\nQuestion: and what was that same percentage representation in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.17743" } ]
CONVFINQA2776	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds . ( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . ( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt . ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 lease obligation and entergy louisiana 2019s acquisition of the equity participant 2019s beneficial interest in the waterford 3 leased assets and for further discussion of the grand gulf lease obligation . ( e ) this note does not have a stated interest rate , but has an implicit interest rate of 7.458% ( 7.458 % ) . ( f ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 57 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , and long-term doe obligations of $ 182 million at entergy arkansas , and includes debt due within one year . fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 15 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 307403</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 828084</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 724899</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>$ 795000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>$ 1674548</td></tr></table> in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date . in october 2015 , entergy announced a planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its fuel cycle . as a result of the announcement , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement . in august 2016 , entergy entered into a trust transfer agreement with nypa to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants to entergy . as part of the trust transfer agreement , the original decommissioning agreements were amended , and the entergy subsidiaries 2019 obligation to make additional license extension payments to nypa was eliminated . in the third quarter 2016 , entergy removed the note payable of $ 35.1 million from the consolidated balance sheet . entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 . entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 . entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through june 2018 . capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .\nQuestion: what amount of long-term debt is due in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "307403.0" } ]
CONVFINQA990	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsources of blackrock 2019s operating cash primarily include investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue , performance fees , revenue from technology and risk management services , advisory and other revenue and distribution fees . blackrock uses its cash to pay all operating expense , interest and principal on borrowings , income taxes , dividends on blackrock 2019s capital stock , repurchases of the company 2019s stock , capital expenditures and purchases of co-investments and seed investments . for details of the company 2019s gaap cash flows from operating , investing and financing activities , see the consolidated statements of cash flows contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing . cash flows from operating activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , primarily include the receipt of investment advisory and administration fees , securities lending revenue and performance fees offset by the payment of operating expenses incurred in the normal course of business , including year-end incentive compensation accrued for in the prior year . cash outflows from investing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 517 million and primarily reflected $ 497 million of investment purchases , $ 155 million of purchases of property and equipment , $ 73 million related to the first reserve transaction and $ 29 million related to the cachematrix transaction , partially offset by $ 205 million of net proceeds from sales and maturities of certain investments . cash outflows from financing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 3094 million , primarily resulting from $ 1.4 billion of share repurchases , including $ 1.1 billion in open market- transactions and $ 321 million of employee tax withholdings related to employee stock transactions , $ 1.7 billion of cash dividend payments and $ 700 million of repayments of long- term borrowings , partially offset by $ 697 million of proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings . the company manages its financial condition and funding to maintain appropriate liquidity for the business . liquidity resources at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) december 31 , december 31 , cash and cash equivalents ( 1 ) $ 6894 $ 6091 cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 ) ( 63 ) ( 53 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents ( 1 )</td><td>$ 6894</td><td>$ 6091</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 )</td><td>-63 ( 63 )</td><td>-53 ( 53 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>subtotal</td><td>6831</td><td>6038</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit facility 2014 undrawn</td><td>4000</td><td>4000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total liquidity resources ( 3 )</td><td>$ 10831</td><td>$ 10038</td></tr></table> total liquidity resources ( 3 ) $ 10831 $ 10038 ( 1 ) the percentage of cash and cash equivalents held by the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries was approximately 40% ( 40 % ) and 50% ( 50 % ) at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . see net capital requirements herein for more information on net capital requirements in certain regulated subsidiaries . ( 2 ) the company cannot readily access such cash to use in its operating activities . ( 3 ) amounts do not reflect a reduction for year-end incentive compensation accruals of approximately $ 1.5 billion and $ 1.3 billion for 2017 and 2016 , respectively , which are paid in the first quarter of the following year . total liquidity resources increased $ 793 million during 2017 , primarily reflecting cash flows from operating activities , partially offset by cash payments of 2016 year-end incentive awards , share repurchases of $ 1.4 billion and cash dividend payments of $ 1.7 billion . a significant portion of the company 2019s $ 3154 million of total investments , as adjusted , is illiquid in nature and , as such , cannot be readily convertible to cash . share repurchases . the company repurchased 2.6 million common shares in open market transactions under the share repurchase program for approximately $ 1.1 billion during 2017 . at december 31 , 2017 , there were 6.4 million shares still authorized to be repurchased . net capital requirements . the company is required to maintain net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries within a number of jurisdictions , which is partially maintained by retaining cash and cash equivalent investments in those subsidiaries or jurisdictions . as a result , such subsidiaries of the company may be restricted in their ability to transfer cash between different jurisdictions and to their parents . additionally , transfers of cash between international jurisdictions may have adverse tax consequences that could discourage such transfers . blackrock institutional trust company , n.a . ( 201cbtc 201d ) is chartered as a national bank that does not accept client deposits and whose powers are limited to trust and other fiduciary activities . btc provides investment management services , including investment advisory and securities lending agency services , to institutional clients . btc is subject to regulatory capital and liquid asset requirements administered by the office of the comptroller of the currency . at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company was required to maintain approximately $ 1.8 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively , in net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries , including btc , entities regulated by the financial conduct authority and prudential regulation authority in the united kingdom , and the company 2019s broker-dealers . the company was in compliance with all applicable regulatory net capital requirements . undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries . as a result of the 2017 tax act and the one-time mandatory deemed repatriation tax on untaxed accumulated foreign earnings , a provisional amount of u.s . income taxes was provided on the undistributed foreign earnings . the financial statement basis in excess of tax basis of its foreign subsidiaries remains indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations . the company will continue to evaluate its capital management plans throughout 2018 . short-term borrowings 2017 revolving credit facility . the company 2019s credit facility has an aggregate commitment amount of $ 4.0 billion and was amended in april 2017 to extend the maturity date to april 2022 ( the 201c2017 credit facility 201d ) . the 2017 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2017 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 5.0 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2017 credit facility requires the company .\nQuestion: in the year of 2017, what amount from the liquidity comes from credit?\nAnswer: 4000.0\nQuestion: and what was that liquidity?\nAnswer: 10831.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of the liquidity did that amount represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.36931" } ]
CONVFINQA9225	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis stock restrict the amount of retained earnings available for the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy arkansas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy arkansas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy arkansas require prior regulatory approval . preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in entergy arkansas 2019s corporate charters , bond indentures , and other agreements . entergy arkansas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td><td>$ 17531</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2017 . the $ 150 million credit facility allows entergy arkansas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , no letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support commercial paper issued by the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc and the tennessee regulatory authority ; the current authorizations extend through december 2018. .\nQuestion: what was the balance of money pool in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "51232.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2840	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 114 million in gross wholesale revenue due to an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales and an increase in sales to affiliated customers ; an increase of $ 106.1 million in production cost allocation rider revenues which became effective in july 2007 as a result of the system agreement proceedings . as a result of the system agreement proceedings , entergy arkansas also has a corresponding increase in deferred fuel expense for payments to other entergy system companies such that there is no effect on net income . entergy arkansas makes payments over a seven-month period but collections from customers occur over a twelve-month period . the production cost allocation rider is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements and the system agreement proceedings are referenced below under \"federal regulation\" ; and an increase of $ 58.9 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to changes in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2008 and september 2008 , partially offset by decreased usage . the energy cost recovery rider filings are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 14.6 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase of $ 106.1 million in deferred system agreement payments , as discussed above and an increase in the average market price of purchased power . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 1074.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>13.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>11.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred fuel costs revisions</td><td>8.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.6</td></tr></table> the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower wholesale revenues in the third quarter 2006 due to an october 2006 ferc order requiring entergy arkansas to make a refund to a coal plant co-owner resulting from a contract dispute , in addition to re-pricing revisions , retroactive to 2003 , of $ 5.9 million of purchased power agreements among entergy system companies as directed by the ferc . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance is primarily due to the 2006 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter 2007 , which increased net revenue by $ 6.6 million . gross operating revenue and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 173.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to a decrease in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2007 . the energy cost recovery rider is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the decrease was partially offset by production cost allocation rider revenues of $ 124.1 million that became effective in july 2007 as a result of the system agreement proceedings . as .\nQuestion: what was the difference in net revenue between 2006 and 2007?\nAnswer: -36.1\nQuestion: and the amount attributable to transmission in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11.8" } ]
CONVFINQA7551	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of pps , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha america inc . cellulose derivatives strategic ventures . our cellulose derivatives ventures generally fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay dividends based on each ventures' performance in the preceding year . in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we received cash dividends of $ 115 million , $ 92 million and $ 83 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( \"us gaap\" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2014 ( in percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2014 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr></table> research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . aoplus ae , aoplus ae2 , aoplus ae3 , ateva ae , avicor ae , britecoat ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx 2122 , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , duroset ae , ecovae ae , factor ae , fortron ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , impet ae , mowilith ae , nutrinova ae , qorus 2122 , riteflex ae , sunett ae , tcx 2122 , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vantageplus 2122 , vantage ae2 , vectra ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in r&d expense from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: 1.0\nQuestion: what is the r&d expense in 2014?\nAnswer: 85.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.01176\nQuestion: what is the amount of cash dividends received in 2014?\nAnswer: 115.0\nQuestion: what about in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "83.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7670	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( a ) excludes discontinued operations . ( b ) earnings before interest expense and taxes as a percent of average total assets . ( c ) total debt as a percent of the sum of total debt , shareholders 2019 equity and non-current deferred income tax liabilities . the results above include the impact of the specified items detailed below . additional discussion regarding the specified items in fiscal years 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are provided in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>years ended september 30 2017</td><td>years ended september 30 2016</td><td>years ended september 30 2015</td><td>years ended september 30 2014</td><td>years ended september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total specified items</td><td>$ 1466</td><td>$ 1261</td><td>$ 1186</td><td>$ 153</td><td>$ 442</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>after-tax impact of specified items</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 892</td><td>$ 786</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impact of specified items on diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ -4.34 ( 4.34 )</td><td>$ -4.10 ( 4.10 )</td><td>$ -3.79 ( 3.79 )</td><td>$ -0.51 ( 0.51 )</td><td>$ -1.40 ( 1.40 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impact of dilution from share issuances</td><td>$ -0.54 ( 0.54 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -0.02 ( 0.02 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following commentary should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes . within the tables presented throughout this discussion , certain columns may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes . percentages and earnings per share amounts presented are calculated from the underlying amounts . references to years throughout this discussion relate to our fiscal years , which end on september 30 . company overview description of the company and business segments becton , dickinson and company ( 201cbd 201d ) is a global medical technology company engaged in the development , manufacture and sale of a broad range of medical supplies , devices , laboratory equipment and diagnostic products used by healthcare institutions , life science researchers , clinical laboratories , the pharmaceutical industry and the general public . the company's organizational structure is based upon two principal business segments , bd medical ( 201cmedical 201d ) and bd life sciences ( 201clife sciences 201d ) . bd 2019s products are manufactured and sold worldwide . our products are marketed in the united states and internationally through independent distribution channels and directly to end-users by bd and independent sales representatives . we organize our operations outside the united states as follows : europe ; ema ( which includes the commonwealth of independent states , the middle east and africa ) ; greater asia ( which includes japan and asia pacific ) ; latin america ( which includes mexico , central america , the caribbean , and south america ) ; and canada . we continue to pursue growth opportunities in emerging markets , which include the following geographic regions : eastern europe , the middle east , africa , latin america and certain countries within asia pacific . we are primarily focused on certain countries whose healthcare systems are expanding , in particular , china and india . strategic objectives bd remains focused on delivering sustainable growth and shareholder value , while making appropriate investments for the future . bd management operates the business consistent with the following core strategies : 2022 to increase revenue growth by focusing on our core products , services and solutions that deliver greater benefits to patients , healthcare workers and researchers; .\nQuestion: what is the tax amount related to total specified items in 2017?\nAnswer: 495.0\nQuestion: what is the tax amount related to total specified items in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "495.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9307	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>119</td><td>142</td><td>190</td><td>235</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>115</td><td>117</td><td>136</td><td>180</td><td>205</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>97</td><td>97</td><td>113</td><td>144</td><td>182</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 97 97 113 144 182 .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of teleflex incorporated from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: 17.0\nQuestion: and what was that value in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "102.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3671	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .\nQuestion: what was cash from operations in 2009?\nAnswer: 868.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "641.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1112	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis the table below presents the operating results of our institutional client services segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td><td>year ended december 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fixed income currency and commodities client execution</td><td>$ 9914</td><td>$ 9018</td><td>$ 13707</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equities client execution1</td><td>3171</td><td>3031</td><td>3231</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commissions and fees</td><td>3053</td><td>3633</td><td>3426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities services</td><td>1986</td><td>1598</td><td>1432</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total equities</td><td>8210</td><td>8262</td><td>8089</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>18124</td><td>17280</td><td>21796</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>12480</td><td>12837</td><td>14994</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>pre-tax earnings</td><td>$ 5644</td><td>$ 4443</td><td>$ 6802</td></tr></table> 1 . includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively . 2012 versus 2011 . net revenues in institutional client services were $ 18.12 billion for 2012 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2011 . net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 9.91 billion for 2012 , 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2011 . these results reflected strong net revenues in mortgages , which were significantly higher compared with 2011 . in addition , net revenues in credit products and interest rate products were solid and higher compared with 2011 . these increases were partially offset by significantly lower net revenues in commodities and slightly lower net revenues in currencies . although broad market concerns persisted during 2012 , fixed income , currency and commodities client execution operated in a generally improved environment characterized by tighter credit spreads and less challenging market-making conditions compared with 2011 . net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . net revenues in securities services were significantly higher compared with 2011 , reflecting a gain of approximately $ 500 million on the sale of our hedge fund administration business . in addition , equities client execution net revenues were higher than 2011 , primarily reflecting significantly higher results in cash products , principally due to increased levels of client activity . these increases were offset by lower commissions and fees , reflecting lower market volumes . during 2012 , equities operated in an environment generally characterized by an increase in global equity prices and lower volatility levels . the net loss attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 714 million ( $ 433 million and $ 281 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2012 , compared with a net gain of $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 . during 2012 , institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by continued broad market concerns and uncertainties , although positive developments helped to improve market conditions . these developments included certain central bank actions to ease monetary policy and address funding risks for european financial institutions . in addition , the u.s . economy posted stable to improving economic data , including favorable developments in unemployment and housing . these improvements resulted in tighter credit spreads , higher global equity prices and lower levels of volatility . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and continued political uncertainty , particularly the political debate in the united states surrounding the fiscal cliff , generally resulted in client risk aversion and lower activity levels . also , uncertainty over financial regulatory reform persisted . if these concerns and uncertainties continue over the long term , net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 12.48 billion for 2012 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2011 , primarily due to lower brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , and lower impairment charges , partially offset by higher net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings . pre-tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 . 2011 versus 2010 . net revenues in institutional client services were $ 17.28 billion for 2011 , 21% ( 21 % ) lower than 2010 . net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 9.02 billion for 2011 , 34% ( 34 % ) lower than 2010 . although activity levels during 2011 were generally consistent with 2010 levels , and results were solid during the first quarter of 2011 , the environment during the remainder of 2011 was characterized by broad market concerns and uncertainty , resulting in volatile markets and significantly wider credit spreads , which contributed to difficult market-making conditions and led to reductions in risk by us and our clients . as a result of these conditions , net revenues across the franchise were lower , including significant declines in mortgages and credit products , compared with 2010 . 54 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .\nQuestion: what was the total of net revenues related to reinsurance in 2012, in billions of dollars?\nAnswer: 1.08\nQuestion: and what is that in millions?\nAnswer: 1080.0\nQuestion: and between the two previous years, what was the change in that total for all revenues?\nAnswer: -4516.0\nQuestion: what is this change as a percentage of those net revenues in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.20719" } ]
CONVFINQA248	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .\nQuestion: what was the change in net reserves from 2011 to 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-54.5" } ]
CONVFINQA6205	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 166137 )</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2018 . a0 a0the $ 150 million credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against $ 5 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . a0 a0as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 50 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 24.9 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc , and the current authorization extends through december 2018 . entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery retail rates 2015 base rate filing in april 2015 , entergy arkansas filed with the apsc for a general change in rates , charges , and tariffs . the filing notified the apsc of entergy arkansas 2019s intent to implement a forward test year formula rate plan pursuant to arkansas legislation passed in 2015 , and requested a retail rate increase of $ 268.4 million , with a net increase in revenue of $ 167 million . the filing requested a 10.2% ( 10.2 % ) return on common equity . in september 2015 the apsc staff and intervenors filed direct testimony , with the apsc staff recommending a revenue requirement of $ 217.9 million and a 9.65% ( 9.65 % ) return on common equity . in december 2015 , entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and certain of the intervenors in the rate case filed with the apsc a joint motion for approval of a settlement of the case that proposed a retail rate increase of approximately $ 225 million with a net increase in revenue of approximately $ 133 million ; an authorized return on common equity of 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) ; and a formula rate plan tariff that provides a +/- 50 basis point band around the 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) allowed return on common equity . a significant portion of the rate increase is related to entergy arkansas 2019s acquisition in march 2016 of union power station power block 2 for a base purchase price of $ 237 million . the settlement agreement also provided for amortization over a 10-year period of $ 7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano post-fukushima compliance and $ 9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano flood barrier compliance . a settlement hearing was held in january 2016 . in february 2016 the apsc approved the settlement with one exception that reduced the retail rate increase proposed in the settlement by $ 5 million . the settling parties agreed to the apsc modifications in february 2016 . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . in march 2016 , entergy arkansas made a compliance filing regarding the .\nQuestion: what was the total of the entergy arkansas 2019s payables in 2017, in millions?\nAnswer: 166137.0\nQuestion: and what was it for 2016?\nAnswer: 51232.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total of payables for both years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "217369.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7590	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndirect the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.0 billion as of december 31 , 2014 . 17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 included $ 2454 million , net of $ 1210 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2486 million , net of $ 1092 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2014 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 508</td><td>$ 253</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>484</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>429</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>356</td><td>224</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019</td><td>323</td><td>210</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1625</td><td>745</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 3725</td><td>$ 1927</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-407 ( 407 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1520</td></tr></table> approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 593 million in 2014 , $ 618 million in 2013 , and $ 631 million in 2012 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 7% ( 7 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2014 . because of the uncertainty .\nQuestion: what are minimum payments of operating leases?\nAnswer: 3725.0\nQuestion: what are minimum payments of capital leases?\nAnswer: 1927.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5652.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5071	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninterest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .\nQuestion: what was the difference in rent expenses included in sg&a expenses from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer: 26.0\nQuestion: what was the rent expense included in sg&a expenses in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "83.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2835	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity and capital resources the major components of changes in cash flows for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 are discussed in the following paragraphs . the following table summarizes our cash flow from operating activities , investing activities and financing activities for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1847.8</td><td>$ 1679.7</td><td>$ 1529.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-961.2 ( 961.2 )</td><td>-1482.8 ( 1482.8 )</td><td>-959.8 ( 959.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-851.2 ( 851.2 )</td><td>-239.7 ( 239.7 )</td><td>-708.1 ( 708.1 )</td></tr></table> cash flows provided by operating activities the most significant items affecting the comparison of our operating cash flows for 2016 and 2015 are summarized below : changes in assets and liabilities , net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures , decreased our cash flow from operations by $ 205.2 million in 2016 , compared to a decrease of $ 316.7 million in 2015 , primarily as a result of the following : 2022 our accounts receivable , exclusive of the change in allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , increased $ 52.3 million during 2016 due to the timing of billings net of collections , compared to a $ 15.7 million increase in 2015 . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , our days sales outstanding were 38.1 and 38.3 days , or 26.1 and 25.8 days net of deferred revenue , respectively . 2022 our accounts payable decreased $ 9.8 million during 2016 compared to an increase of $ 35.6 million during 2015 , due to the timing of payments . 2022 cash paid for capping , closure and post-closure obligations was $ 11.0 million lower during 2016 compared to 2015 . the decrease in cash paid for capping , closure , and post-closure obligations is primarily due to payments in 2015 related to a required capping event at one of our closed landfills . 2022 cash paid for remediation obligations was $ 13.2 million lower during 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the timing of obligations . in addition , cash paid for income taxes was approximately $ 265 million and $ 321 million for 2016 and 2015 , respectively . income taxes paid in 2016 and 2015 reflect the favorable tax depreciation provisions of the protecting americans from tax hikes act signed into law in december 2015 as well as the realization of certain tax credits . cash paid for interest was $ 330.2 million and $ 327.6 million for 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the most significant items affecting the comparison of our operating cash flows for 2015 and 2014 are summarized below : changes in assets and liabilities , net of effects of business acquisitions and divestitures , decreased our cash flow from operations by $ 316.7 million in 2015 , compared to a decrease of $ 295.6 million in 2014 , primarily as a result of the following : 2022 our accounts receivable , exclusive of the change in allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , increased $ 15.7 million during 2015 due to the timing of billings , net of collections , compared to a $ 54.3 million increase in 2014 . as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , our days sales outstanding were 38 days , or 26 and 25 days net of deferred revenue , respectively . 2022 our accounts payable increased $ 35.6 million and $ 3.3 million during 2015 and 2014 , respectively , due to the timing of payments as of december 31 , 2015. .\nQuestion: what was the net cash from operating activities in 2016?\nAnswer: 1847.8\nQuestion: what was the net cash from investing activities in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-961.2" } ]
CONVFINQA4506	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncompared with $ 6.2 billion in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were significantly higher than in both 2014 and 2013 . excluding facility closure costs , impairment costs and other special items , operating profits in 2015 were 3% ( 3 % ) lower than in 2014 and 4% ( 4 % ) higher than in 2013 . benefits from lower input costs ( $ 18 million ) , lower costs associated with the closure of our courtland , alabama mill ( $ 44 million ) and favorable foreign exchange ( $ 33 million ) were offset by lower average sales price realizations and mix ( $ 52 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 16 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 18 million ) and higher planned maintenance downtime costs ( $ 26 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2014 include special items costs of $ 554 million associated with the closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . in the first quarter of 2014 , we completed our evaluation and concluded that there were no alternative uses for these assets . we recognized approximately $ 464 million of accelerated depreciation related to these assets in 2014 . operating profits in 2014 also include a charge of $ 32 million associated with a foreign tax amnesty program , and a gain of $ 20 million for the resolution of a legal contingency in india , while operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill and a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 5031</td><td>$ 5720</td><td>$ 6205</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit ( loss )</td><td>533</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>271</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 , $ 2.1 billion in 2014 and $ 2.6 billion in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were $ 179 million compared with a loss of $ 398 million ( a gain of $ 156 million excluding costs associated with the shutdown of our courtland , alabama mill ) in 2014 and a gain of $ 36 million ( $ 154 million excluding costs associated with the courtland mill shutdown ) in 2013 . sales volumes in 2015 decreased compared with 2014 primarily due to the closure of our courtland mill in 2014 . shipments to the domestic market increased , but export shipments declined . average sales price realizations decreased , primarily in the domestic market . input costs were lower , mainly for energy . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 12 million higher in 2015 . operating profits in 2014 were negatively impacted by costs associated with the shutdown of our courtland , alabama mill . entering the first quarter of 2016 , sales volumes are expected to be up slightly compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 . average sales margins should be about flat reflecting lower average sales price realizations offset by a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be stable . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 14 million lower with an outage scheduled in the 2016 first quarter at our georgetown mill compared with outages at our eastover and riverdale mills in the 2015 fourth quarter . in january 2015 , the united steelworkers , domtar corporation , packaging corporation of america , finch paper llc and p . h . glatfelter company ( the petitioners ) filed an anti-dumping petition before the united states international trade commission ( itc ) and the united states department of commerce ( doc ) alleging that paper producers in china , indonesia , australia , brazil , and portugal are selling uncoated free sheet paper in sheet form ( the products ) in violation of international trade rules . the petitioners also filed a countervailing-duties petition with these agencies regarding imports of the products from china and indonesia . in january 2016 , the doc announced its final countervailing duty rates on imports of the products to the united states from certain producers from china and indonesia . also , in january 2016 , the doc announced its final anti-dumping duty rates on imports of the products to the united states from certain producers from australia , brazil , china , indonesia and portugal . in february 2016 , the itc concluded its anti- dumping and countervailing duties investigations and made a final determination that the u.s . market had been injured by imports of the products . accordingly , the doc 2019s previously announced countervailing duty rates and anti-dumping duty rates will be in effect for a minimum of five years . we do not believe the impact of these rates will have a material , adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements . brazilian papers net sales for 2015 were $ 878 million compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 . operating profits for 2015 were $ 186 million compared with $ 177 million ( $ 209 million excluding costs associated with a tax amnesty program ) in 2014 and $ 210 million in 2013 . sales volumes in 2015 were lower compared with 2014 reflecting weak economic conditions and the absence of 2014 one-time events . average sales price realizations improved for domestic uncoated freesheet paper due to the realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2015 . margins were unfavorably affected by an increased proportion of sales to the lower-margin export markets . raw material costs increased for energy and wood . operating costs were higher than in 2014 , while planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 4 million lower. .\nQuestion: what was the total of north american printing papers net sales in 2015, in billions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.9" } ]
CONVFINQA1864	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmillion excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .\nQuestion: what is the net sales of printing papers in north american in 2013, in billions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.6" } ]
CONVFINQA8304	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nregulatory balancing accounts accumulate differences between revenues recognized and authorized revenue requirements until they are collected from customers or are refunded . regulatory balancing accounts include low income programs and purchased power and water accounts . debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues . call premiums on the redemption of long- term debt , as well as unamortized debt expense , are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates . as a result of american water capital corp . 2019s prepayment of the 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series c senior notes due december 21 , 2018 ( 201cseries c senior notes 201d ) and 5.77% ( 5.77 % ) series d senior notes due december 21 , 2021 ( 201cseries d senior notes 201d ) and payment of a make-whole premium amount to the holders thereof of $ 34 million , the company recorded a $ 6 million charge resulting from the early extinguishment of debt at the parent company . substantially all of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the company 2019s utility subsidiaries were recorded as regulatory assets that the company believes are probable of recovery in future rates . approximately $ 1 million of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the company 2019s utility subsidiaries was amortized in 2017 . purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the company 2019s california utility subsidiary during 2002 , and acquisitions in 2007 by the company 2019s new jersey utility subsidiary . as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 . tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from two to fifteen years , as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service . other regulatory assets include certain construction costs for treatment facilities , property tax stabilization , employee-related costs , deferred other postretirement benefit expense , business services project expenses , coastal water project costs , rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others . these costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods . regulatory liabilities regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are probable of being credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process . also , if costs expected to be incurred in the future are currently being recovered through rates , the company records those expected future costs as regulatory liabilities . the following table summarizes the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income taxes recovered through rates</td><td>$ 1242</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>removal costs recovered through rates</td><td>315</td><td>316</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts</td><td>48</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>59</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total regulatory liabilities</td><td>$ 1664</td><td>$ 403</td></tr></table> income taxes recovered through rates relate to deferred taxes that will likely be refunded to the company 2019s customers . on december 22 , 2017 , the tcja was signed into law , which , among other things , enacted significant and complex changes to the internal revenue code of 1986 , including a reduction in the maximum u.s . federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) as of january 1 , 2018 . the tcja created significant .\nQuestion: what is the total total regulatory liabilities in 2017?\nAnswer: 1664.0\nQuestion: what about in 2016?\nAnswer: 403.0\nQuestion: what is the net increase?\nAnswer: 1261.0\nQuestion: what is the total total regulatory liabilities in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "403.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2891	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\napple inc . \| 2016 form 10-k \| 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 24 , 2016 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 23 , 2011 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2016 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september2011</td><td>september2012</td><td>september2013</td><td>september2014</td><td>september2015</td><td>september2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 123</td><td>$ 183</td><td>$ 212</td><td>$ 213</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 155</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 185</td><td>$ 213</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p information technology index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 142</td><td>$ 183</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 230</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones u.s . technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 217</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of the apple inc . stock in 2016?\nAnswer: 213.0\nQuestion: and what was the change in this value since 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "113.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8230	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncomparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 108</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 201</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 86</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 98</td><td>$ 114</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 139</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 210</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is \"furnished\" and shall not be deemed to be \"soliciting material\" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed \"filed\" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of lkq corporation price between 2007 and 2012?\nAnswer: 101.0\nQuestion: what was the price of lkq corporation in 2007?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\nAnswer: 1.01\nQuestion: what was the change in value of the peer group between 2007 and 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "110.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4548	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents the following table presents certain payments due by the company under contractual obligations with minimum firm commitments as of september 28 , 2013 and excludes amounts already recorded on the consolidated balance sheet , except for long-term debt ( in millions ) : lease commitments the company 2019s major facility leases are typically for terms not exceeding 10 years and generally provide renewal options for terms not exceeding five additional years . leases for retail space are for terms ranging from five to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 28 , 2013 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 4.7 billion , of which $ 3.5 billion related to leases for retail space . purchase commitments with outsourcing partners and component suppliers the company utilizes several outsourcing partners to manufacture sub-assemblies for the company 2019s products and to perform final assembly and testing of finished products . these outsourcing partners acquire components and build product based on demand information supplied by the company , which typically covers periods up to 150 days . the company also obtains individual components for its products from a wide variety of individual suppliers . consistent with industry practice , the company acquires components through a combination of purchase orders , supplier contracts , and open orders based on projected demand information . where appropriate , the purchases are applied to inventory component prepayments that are outstanding with the respective supplier . as of september 28 , 2013 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third- party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 18.6 billion . other obligations in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 1.3 billion as of september 28 , 2013 , that consisted mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . the company 2019s other non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets consist primarily of deferred tax liabilities , gross unrecognized tax benefits and the related gross interest and penalties . as of september 28 , 2013 , the company had non-current deferred tax liabilities of $ 16.5 billion . additionally , as of september 28 , 2013 , the company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $ 2.7 billion and an additional $ 590 million for gross interest and penalties classified as non-current liabilities . at this time , the company is unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years in connection with these tax liabilities ; therefore , such amounts are not included in the above contractual obligation table . indemnification the company generally does not indemnify end-users of its operating system and application software against legal claims that the software infringes third-party intellectual property rights . other agreements entered into by payments due in than 1 payments due in payments due in payments due in than 5 years total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>payments due in less than1 year</td><td>payments due in 1-3 years</td><td>payments due in 4-5 years</td><td>payments due in more than5 years</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 2500</td><td>$ 6000</td><td>$ 8500</td><td>$ 17000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating leases</td><td>610</td><td>1200</td><td>1056</td><td>1855</td><td>4721</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>18616</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>18616</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other obligations</td><td>1081</td><td>248</td><td>16</td><td>3</td><td>1348</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 20307</td><td>$ 3948</td><td>$ 7072</td><td>$ 10358</td><td>$ 41685</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: as of september 28, 2013, what was the total of the non-current deferred tax liabilities the company had?\nAnswer: 16.5\nQuestion: and what was the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits?\nAnswer: 2.7\nQuestion: what was, then, the difference between them, in billions?\nAnswer: 13.8\nQuestion: and as of that same date, what was the total of the purchase obligations?\nAnswer: 18616.0\nQuestion: and what percentage did this total represent in relation to the total of certain payments due by the company under contractual obligations?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.44659" } ]
CONVFINQA6979	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.84</td><td>$ 152.16</td><td>$ 165.35</td><td>$ 154.61</td><td>$ 189.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.99</td><td>$ 153.54</td><td>$ 174.54</td><td>$ 176.94</td><td>$ 198.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.07</td><td>$ 158.22</td><td>$ 192.80</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the ups share price from 2011 to 2016?\nAnswer: 89.72\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\nAnswer: 0.8972\nQuestion: what is the net change in the s&p 500 index from 2011 to 2016?\nAnswer: 98.09\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\nAnswer: 0.9809\nQuestion: what is the difference between the two percents?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.0837" } ]
CONVFINQA3092	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncustomary conditions . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture . as of december 31 , 2008 , the joint venture has acquired seven properties from us and we received year-to-date net sale proceeds and financing distributions of approximately $ 251.6 million . in january 2008 , we sold a tract of land to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we hold a 50% ( 50 % ) equity interest and received a distribution , commensurate to our partner 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership interest , of approximately $ 38.3 million . in november 2008 , that unconsolidated joint venture entered a loan agreement with a consortium of banks and distributed a portion of the loan proceeds to us and our partner , with our share of the distribution totaling $ 20.4 million . uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 property investment ; 2022 recurring leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; 2022 opportunistic repurchases of outstanding debt ; and 2022 other contractual obligations . property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and we are limiting new development expenditures . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>recurring tenant improvements</td><td>$ 36885</td><td>$ 45296</td><td>$ 41895</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>recurring leasing costs</td><td>28205</td><td>32238</td><td>32983</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>9724</td><td>8402</td><td>8122</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>totals</td><td>$ 74814</td><td>$ 85936</td><td>$ 83000</td></tr></table> dividends and distributions in order to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes , we must currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our taxable income to shareholders . because depreciation is a non-cash expense , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 1.93 , $ 1.91 and $ 1.89 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute taxable earnings to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status . however , distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . in january 2009 , our board of directors resolved to decrease our annual dividend from $ 1.94 per share to $ 1.00 per share in order to retain additional cash to help meet our capital needs . we anticipate retaining additional cash of approximately $ 145.2 million per year , when compared to an annual dividend of $ 1.94 per share , as the result of this action . at december 31 , 2008 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. .\nQuestion: as of 2008, what percentage of the total recurring capital expenditures were associated with leasing costs?\nAnswer: 0.377\nQuestion: and in that same year, what was the dividend per share paid?\nAnswer: 1.93\nQuestion: what was it in 2007?\nAnswer: 1.91\nQuestion: what was, then, the total dividend per share paid in both years combined?\nAnswer: 3.84\nQuestion: including 2006, what then becomes this total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5.73" } ]
CONVFINQA1178	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions total 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>other commercial commitmentsmillions</td><td>total</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2013</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2014</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2015</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2016</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2017</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period after 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facilities [a]</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables securitization facility [b]</td><td>600</td><td>600</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>guarantees [c]</td><td>307</td><td>8</td><td>214</td><td>12</td><td>30</td><td>10</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit [d]</td><td>25</td><td>24</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total commercialcommitments</td><td>$ 2732</td><td>$ 632</td><td>$ 215</td><td>$ 1812</td><td>$ 30</td><td>$ 10</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2012 . [b] $ 100 million of the receivables securitization facility was utilized at december 31 , 2012 , which is accounted for as debt . the full program matures in july 2013 . [c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . [d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2012 . off-balance sheet arrangements guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2012 , we were contingently liable for $ 307 million in guarantees . we have recorded a liability of $ 2 million for the fair value of these obligations as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 . we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . the final guarantee expires in 2022 . we are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees . we do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . other matters labor agreements 2013 approximately 86% ( 86 % ) of our 45928 full-time-equivalent employees are represented by 14 major rail unions . during the year , we concluded the most recent round of negotiations , which began in 2010 , with the ratification of new agreements by several unions that continued negotiating into 2012 . all of the unions executed similar multi-year agreements that provide for higher employee cost sharing of employee health and welfare benefits and higher wages . the current agreements will remain in effect until renegotiated under provisions of the railway labor act . the next round of negotiations will begin in early 2015 . inflation 2013 long periods of inflation significantly increase asset replacement costs for capital-intensive companies . as a result , assuming that we replace all operating assets at current price levels , depreciation charges ( on an inflation-adjusted basis ) would be substantially greater than historically reported amounts . derivative financial instruments 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk-management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable price movements . market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item . we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities. .\nQuestion: what is the value of total commercial commitments?\nAnswer: 2732.0\nQuestion: what about the value of utilizes receivables securitization facility during 2012?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: if receivables securitization facility is excluded what would be the total commercial commitments?\nAnswer: 2632.0\nQuestion: what is the value of standby letter of credit commitments expiring in 12 months?\nAnswer: 24.0\nQuestion: what about the total value of standby letters of credit?\nAnswer: 25.0\nQuestion: what portion is classified under current portion?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.96" } ]
CONVFINQA4799	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.05</td><td>$ 97.04</td><td>$ 121.73</td><td>$ 161.39</td><td>$ 170.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj us containers & packaging</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 106.73</td><td>$ 66.91</td><td>$ 93.98</td><td>$ 110.23</td><td>$ 110.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 105.49</td><td>$ 66.46</td><td>$ 84.05</td><td>$ 96.71</td><td>$ 98.75</td></tr></table> copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .\nQuestion: what was the value of ball corporation in 2008?\nAnswer: 97.04\nQuestion: what is the change in value from the initial $100 investment?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-2.96" } ]
CONVFINQA954	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment and the all other category were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>smokeable products</td><td>85.8% ( 85.8 % )</td><td>86.2% ( 86.2 % )</td><td>87.4% ( 87.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smokeless products</td><td>13.2</td><td>13.1</td><td>12.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>wine</td><td>1.5</td><td>1.8</td><td>1.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other</td><td>-0.5 ( 0.5 )</td><td>-1.1 ( 1.1 )</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> for items affecting the comparability of the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment , see note 15 . narrative description of business portions of the information called for by this item are included in operating results by business segment in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of this annual report on form 10-k ( 201citem 7 201d ) . tobacco space altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies include pm usa , usstc and other subsidiaries of ust , middleton , nu mark and nat sherman . altria group distribution company provides sales and distribution services to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies . the products of altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco subsidiaries include smokeable tobacco products , consisting of cigarettes manufactured and sold by pm usa and nat sherman , machine- made large cigars and pipe tobacco manufactured and sold by middleton and premium cigars sold by nat sherman ; smokeless tobacco products manufactured and sold by usstc ; and innovative tobacco products , including e-vapor products manufactured and sold by nu mark . cigarettes : pm usa is the largest cigarette company in the united states . marlboro , the principal cigarette brand of pm usa , has been the largest-selling cigarette brand in the united states for over 40 years . nat sherman sells substantially all of its super premium cigarettes in the united states . total smokeable products segment 2019s cigarettes shipment volume in the united states was 116.6 billion units in 2017 , a decrease of 5.1% ( 5.1 % ) from cigars : middleton is engaged in the manufacture and sale of machine-made large cigars and pipe tobacco . middleton contracts with a third-party importer to supply a majority of its cigars and sells substantially all of its cigars to customers in the united states . black & mild is the principal cigar brand of middleton . nat sherman sources all of its cigars from third-party suppliers and sells substantially all of its cigars to customers in the united states . total smokeable products segment 2019s cigars shipment volume was approximately 1.5 billion units in 2017 , an increase of 9.9% ( 9.9 % ) from 2016 . smokeless tobacco products : usstc is the leading producer and marketer of moist smokeless tobacco ( 201cmst 201d ) products . the smokeless products segment includes the premium brands , copenhagen and skoal , and value brands , red seal and husky . substantially all of the smokeless tobacco products are manufactured and sold to customers in the united states . total smokeless products segment 2019s shipment volume was 841.3 million units in 2017 , a decrease of 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) from 2016 . innovative tobacco products : nu mark participates in the e-vapor category and has developed and commercialized other innovative tobacco products . in addition , nu mark sources the production of its e-vapor products through overseas contract manufacturing arrangements . in 2013 , nu mark introduced markten e-vapor products . in april 2014 , nu mark acquired the e-vapor business of green smoke , inc . and its affiliates ( 201cgreen smoke 201d ) , which began selling e-vapor products in 2009 . in 2017 , altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries purchased certain intellectual property related to innovative tobacco products . in december 2013 , altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries entered into a series of agreements with philip morris international inc . ( 201cpmi 201d ) pursuant to which altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries provide an exclusive license to pmi to sell nu mark 2019s e-vapor products outside the united states , and pmi 2019s subsidiaries provide an exclusive license to altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries to sell two of pmi 2019s heated tobacco product platforms in the united states . further , in july 2015 , altria group , inc . announced the expansion of its strategic framework with pmi to include a joint research , development and technology-sharing agreement . under this agreement , altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries and pmi will collaborate to develop e-vapor products for commercialization in the united states by altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries and in markets outside the united states by pmi . this agreement also provides for exclusive technology cross licenses , technical information sharing and cooperation on scientific assessment , regulatory engagement and approval related to e-vapor products . in the fourth quarter of 2016 , pmi submitted a modified risk tobacco product ( 201cmrtp 201d ) application for an electronically heated tobacco product with the united states food and drug administration 2019s ( 201cfda 201d ) center for tobacco products and filed its corresponding pre-market tobacco product application in the first quarter of 2017 . upon regulatory authorization by the fda , altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries will have an exclusive license to sell this heated tobacco product in the united states . distribution , competition and raw materials : altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco subsidiaries sell their tobacco products principally to wholesalers ( including distributors ) , large retail organizations , including chain stores , and the armed services . the market for tobacco products is highly competitive , characterized by brand recognition and loyalty , with product quality , taste , price , product innovation , marketing , packaging and distribution constituting the significant methods of competition . promotional activities include , in certain instances and where permitted by law , allowances , the distribution of incentive items , price promotions , product promotions , coupons and other discounts. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the value of smokeless products from 2016 to 2017?\nAnswer: 0.1\nQuestion: what was the value of smokeless products in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "13.1" } ]
CONVFINQA1150	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 1 million , $ ( 16 ) million and $ 30 million , respectively . 19 . employee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s . employees . the company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations . for most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation . for those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company- matching contribution , if any , is determined by the collective bargaining agreement . the company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for 2008 and for the first two months of 2009 . the company- matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession . effective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature . this would have included the bargained employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements . on january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) contributed by these eligible employees . compensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 9 million , $ 7 million and $ 42 million , respectively . a portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan . as a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 24 million , $ 28 million and $ 29 million for 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . 20 . other earnings ( millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest income</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 28</td><td>$ 26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>royalty income</td><td>58</td><td>45</td><td>52</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share of net earnings ( loss ) of equity affiliates ( see note 6 )</td><td>45</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gain on sale of assets</td><td>8</td><td>36</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>69</td><td>74</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 214</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 165</td></tr></table> total $ 214 $ 178 $ 165 21 . stock-based compensation the company 2019s stock-based compensation includes stock options , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and grants of contingent shares that are earned based on achieving targeted levels of total shareholder return . all current grants of stock options , rsus and contingent shares are made under the ppg industries , inc . omnibus incentive plan ( 201cppg omnibus plan 201d ) . shares available for future grants under the ppg omnibus plan were 4.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 . total stock-based compensation cost was $ 52 million , $ 34 million and $ 33 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of income related to the stock-based compensation was $ 18 million , $ 12 million and $ 12 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . stock options ppg has outstanding stock option awards that have been granted under two stock option plans : the ppg industries , inc . stock plan ( 201cppg stock plan 201d ) and the ppg omnibus plan . under the ppg omnibus plan and the ppg stock plan , certain employees of the company have been granted options to purchase shares of common stock at prices equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the options were granted . the options are generally exercisable beginning from six to 48 months after being granted and have a maximum term of 10 years . upon exercise of a stock option , shares of company stock are issued from treasury stock . the ppg stock plan includes a restored option provision for options originally granted prior to january 1 , 2003 that allows an optionee to exercise options and satisfy the option price by certifying ownership of mature shares of ppg common stock with equivalent market value . the fair value of stock options issued to employees is measured on the date of grant and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period . ppg estimates the fair value of stock options using the black-scholes option pricing model . the risk-free interest rate is determined by using the u.s . treasury yield curve at the date of the grant and using a maturity equal to the expected life of the option . the expected life of options is calculated using the average of the vesting term and the maximum term , as prescribed by accounting guidance on the use of the simplified method for determining the expected term of an employee share option . this method is used as the vesting term of stock options was changed to three years in 2004 and , as a result , the historical exercise data does not provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected life of options . the expected dividend yield and volatility are based on historical stock prices and dividend amounts over past time periods equal in length to the expected life of the options . 66 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k .\nQuestion: in 2010, what percentage of other income was due to interest income?\nAnswer: 0.15888\nQuestion: and was this interest income higher that the stock-based compensation cost for that year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "no" } ]
CONVFINQA2159	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights</td><td>number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1233672</td><td>$ 75.93</td><td>4903018</td></tr></table> part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .\nQuestion: what is the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?\nAnswer: 1233672.0\nQuestion: and what is the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?\nAnswer: 4903018.0\nQuestion: what is, then, the combined total of those numbers of securities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6136690.0" } ]
CONVFINQA951	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters 2019 exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares will be fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average shares - basic</td><td>156.6</td><td>145.1</td><td>144.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.7</td><td>0.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average shares - diluted</td><td>158.7</td><td>145.8</td><td>144.9</td></tr></table> for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , diluted earnings per share excludes the impact of 0.0 million , 0.0 million , and 4.3 million potential common shares , respectively , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that can be granted under the rdu plan is 28500 . at december 31 , 2013 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus that are outstanding vest daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the 201cdebt pool 201d ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credits the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . payments totaling $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million were made to participants under the rdu plan in april and october 2013 , respectively , in connection with the semi-annual interest payments due . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 1.4 million to the principal component in the year ended december 31 , 2013 as redemption premium equivalents in accordance with the terms of the rdu plan . under the terms of the amended rdu plan , upon the partial redemption of outstanding senior subordinated notes , the rdus ceased to accrue the proportionate related interest component credits . the .\nQuestion: what was the total of semi-annual interest payments in april 2013?\nAnswer: 1.7\nQuestion: and in october 2013?\nAnswer: 1.3\nQuestion: combined, what is the total value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5449	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrestrictive covenants the terms of the 2017 credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and dispose of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges , a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that , we will not during any time when a default is continuing , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable the company to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , we were in compliance with all such covenants . junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures in june a02005 , the company and the operating partnership issued $ 100.0 a0million in unsecured trust preferred securities through a newly formed trust , sl a0green capital trust i , or the trust , which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the operating partnership . the securities mature in 2035 and bear interest at a floating rate of 125 a0basis points over the three-month libor . interest payments may be deferred for a period of up to eight consecutive quarters if the operating partnership exercises its right to defer such payments . the trust preferred securities are redeemable at the option of the operating partnership , in whole or in part , with no prepayment premium . we do not consolidate the trust even though it is a variable interest entity as we are not the primary beneficiary . because the trust is not consolidated , we have recorded the debt on our consolidated balance sheets and the related payments are classified as interest expense . interest rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our variable rate debt . our exposure to interest rate fluctuations are managed through either the use of interest rate derivative instru- ments and/or through our variable rate debt and preferred equity investments . a hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for a02017 would increase our consolidated annual interest cost , net of interest income from variable rate debt and preferred equity investments , by $ 2.7 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by $ 17.2 a0million . at december a031 , 2017 , 61.5% ( 61.5 % ) of our $ 2.1 a0bil- lion debt and preferred equity portfolio is indexed to libor . we recognize most derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges are adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is considered a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recog- nized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is immediately recognized in a0earnings . our long-term debt of $ 4.3 a0billion bears interest at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . our variable rate debt and variable rate joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2017 bore interest based on a spread of libor plus 100 a0basis points to libor plus 415 a0basis points . contractual obligations the combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , the 2017 credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as-of-right extension options and put options , estimated interest expense , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2017 are as follows ( in a0thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages and other loans</td><td>$ 153593</td><td>$ 42289</td><td>$ 703018</td><td>$ 11656</td><td>$ 208003</td><td>$ 1656623</td><td>$ 2775182</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mra facilities</td><td>90809</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>90809</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>40000</td><td>40000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unsecured term loans</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>1500000</td><td>1500000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>800000</td><td>100000</td><td>1400000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capital lease</td><td>2387</td><td>2411</td><td>2620</td><td>2794</td><td>2794</td><td>819894</td><td>832900</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ground leases</td><td>31049</td><td>31066</td><td>31436</td><td>31628</td><td>29472</td><td>703254</td><td>857905</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>226815</td><td>218019</td><td>184376</td><td>163648</td><td>155398</td><td>281694</td><td>1229950</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>200250</td><td>717682</td><td>473809</td><td>449740</td><td>223330</td><td>2119481</td><td>4184292</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total</td><td>$ 954903</td><td>$ 1011467</td><td>$ 1645259</td><td>$ 659466</td><td>$ 1418997</td><td>$ 7320946</td><td>$ 13011038</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the capital lease payment in 2019?\nAnswer: 2411.0\nQuestion: and in 2018?\nAnswer: 2387.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "24.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7970	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) stock options the 2003 plan allows us to grant options to all employees , including executive officers , outside consultants and non- employee directors . this plan will continue until the earlier of ( i ) termination by the board or ( ii ) the date on which all of the shares available for issuance under the plan have been issued and restrictions on issued shares have lapsed . option vesting periods used in the past were generally four years and expire seven years from the effective date of grant . we eliminated the use of stock option grants for all employees and non-employee directors but may choose to issue stock options in the future . performance share programs our 2018 , 2017 and 2016 performance share programs aim to help focus key employees on building stockholder value , provide significant award potential for achieving outstanding company performance and enhance the ability of the company to attract and retain highly talented and competent individuals . the executive compensation committee of our board of directors approves the terms of each of our performance share programs , including the award calculation methodology , under the terms of our 2003 plan . shares may be earned based on the achievement of an objective relative total stockholder return measured over a three-year performance period . performance share awards will be awarded and fully vest upon the later of the executive compensation committee's certification of the level of achievement or the three-year anniversary of each grant . program participants generally have the ability to receive up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares originally granted . on january 24 , 2018 , the executive compensation committee approved the 2018 performance share program , the terms of which are similar to prior year performance share programs as discussed above . as of november 30 , 2018 , the shares awarded under our 2018 , 2017 and 2016 performance share programs are yet to be achieved . issuance of shares upon exercise of stock options , vesting of restricted stock units and performance shares , and purchases of shares under the espp , we will issue treasury stock . if treasury stock is not available , common stock will be issued . in order to minimize the impact of on-going dilution from exercises of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units and performance shares , we instituted a stock repurchase program . see note 12 for information regarding our stock repurchase programs . valuation of stock-based compensation stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award . our performance share awards are valued using a monte carlo simulation model . the fair value of the awards are fixed at grant date and amortized over the longer of the remaining performance or service period . we use the black-scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of espp shares . the determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables . these variables include our expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the awards , actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors , a risk-free interest rate and any expected dividends . the expected term of espp shares is the average of the remaining purchase periods under each offering period . the assumptions used to value employee stock purchase rights were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>0.5 - 2.0</td><td>0.5 - 2.0</td><td>0.5 - 2.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility</td><td>26% ( 26 % ) - 29% ( 29 % )</td><td>22% ( 22 % ) - 27% ( 27 % )</td><td>26 - 29% ( 29 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk free interest rate</td><td>1.54% ( 1.54 % ) - 2.52% ( 2.52 % )</td><td>0.62% ( 0.62 % ) - 1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>0.37 - 1.06% ( 1.06 % )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the low rate of volatility in 2017?\nAnswer: 0.22\nQuestion: what was the high rate?\nAnswer: 0.27\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.49" } ]
CONVFINQA10767	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 , and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 net sales to increase in 2014 in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in net sales from f-35 production contracts . operating profit is expected to increase slightly from 2013 , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between the years due to program mix . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions , and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8367</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>759</td><td>808</td><td>874</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8300</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 479 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of about $ 495 million due to decreased volume on various programs ( command and control programs for classified customers , ngi , and eram programs ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to the completion of certain programs ( such as total information processing support services , the transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) , and odin ) . the decrease was partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 340 million due to the start-up of certain programs ( such as the disa gsm-o and the national science foundation antarctic support ) . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 49 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 55 million due to certain programs nearing the end of their lifecycles , partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 15 million due to the start-up of certain programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were comparable for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford; .\nQuestion: what was the overall total decline in net sales?\nAnswer: 815.0\nQuestion: and what was the offsetting increase to that decline due to the start-up of certain programs?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "340.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9130	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother off-balance sheet commitments lease commitments the company leases various equipment and facilities , including retail space , under noncancelable operating lease arrangements . the company does not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements . the major facility leases are typically for terms not exceeding 10 years and generally provide renewal options for terms not exceeding five additional years . leases for retail space are for terms ranging from five to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 4.4 billion , of which $ 3.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 488 million , $ 338 million and $ 271 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2012 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 516</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>542</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>486</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1801</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 4414</td></tr></table> other commitments as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 21.1 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 988 million as of september 29 , 2012 , which were comprised mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated , certain of which are discussed in part i , item 3 of this form 10-k under the heading 201clegal proceedings 201d and in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors . 201d in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . vs samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment and may be subject to appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended september 29 , 2012. .\nQuestion: what portion of total minimum lease payments are due in 2016?\nAnswer: 0.11622\nQuestion: what is the rent expense in 2011?\nAnswer: 338.0\nQuestion: what about in 2010?\nAnswer: 271.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "67.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6376	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the increase in cash provided by accounts payable-inventory financing was primarily due to a new vendor added to our previously existing inventory financing agreement . for a description of the inventory financing transactions impacting each period , see note 6 ( inventory financing agreements ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . for a description of the debt transactions impacting each period , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . net cash used in financing activities decreased $ 56.3 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily driven by several debt refinancing transactions during each period and our july 2013 ipo , which generated net proceeds of $ 424.7 million after deducting underwriting discounts , expenses and transaction costs . the net impact of our debt transactions resulted in cash outflows of $ 145.9 million and $ 518.3 million during 2014 and 2013 , respectively , as cash was used in each period to reduce our total long-term debt . for a description of the debt transactions impacting each period , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . long-term debt and financing arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , we had total indebtedness of $ 3.3 billion , of which $ 1.6 billion was secured indebtedness . at december 31 , 2015 , we were in compliance with the covenants under our various credit agreements and indentures . the amount of cdw 2019s restricted payment capacity under the senior secured term loan facility was $ 679.7 million at december 31 , 2015 . for further details regarding our debt and each of the transactions described below , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , the following events occurred with respect to our debt structure : 2022 on august 1 , 2015 , we consolidated kelway 2019s term loan and kelway 2019s revolving credit facility . kelway 2019s term loan is denominated in british pounds . the kelway revolving credit facility is a multi-currency revolving credit facility under which kelway is permitted to borrow an aggregate amount of a350.0 million ( $ 73.7 million ) as of december 31 , 2015 . 2022 on march 3 , 2015 , we completed the issuance of $ 525.0 million principal amount of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior notes due 2023 which will mature on september 1 , 2023 . 2022 on march 3 , 2015 , we redeemed the remaining $ 503.9 million aggregate principal amount of the 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) senior notes due 2019 , plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date of redemption , april 2 , 2015 . inventory financing agreements we have entered into agreements with certain financial intermediaries to facilitate the purchase of inventory from various suppliers under certain terms and conditions . these amounts are classified separately as accounts payable-inventory financing on the consolidated balance sheets . we do not incur any interest expense associated with these agreements as balances are paid when they are due . for further details , see note 6 ( inventory financing agreements ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . contractual obligations we have future obligations under various contracts relating to debt and interest payments , operating leases and asset retirement obligations . our estimated future payments , based on undiscounted amounts , under contractual obligations that existed as of december 31 , 2015 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period < 1 year</td><td>payments due by period 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period 4-5 years</td><td>payments due by period > 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>term loan ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1703.4</td><td>$ 63.9</td><td>$ 126.3</td><td>$ 1513.2</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kelway term loan ( 1 )</td><td>90.9</td><td>13.5</td><td>77.4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior notes due 2022 ( 2 )</td><td>852.0</td><td>36.0</td><td>72.0</td><td>72.0</td><td>672.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior notes due 2023 ( 2 )</td><td>735.1</td><td>26.3</td><td>52.5</td><td>52.5</td><td>603.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior notes due 2024 ( 2 )</td><td>859.7</td><td>31.6</td><td>63.3</td><td>63.3</td><td>701.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating leases ( 3 )</td><td>143.2</td><td>22.5</td><td>41.7</td><td>37.1</td><td>41.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>asset retirement obligations ( 4 )</td><td>1.8</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.5</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 4386.1</td><td>$ 194.6</td><td>$ 433.7</td><td>$ 1738.4</td><td>$ 2019.4</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the amount of non secure total indebtedness in 2015, in billions?\nAnswer: 1.7\nQuestion: and what was the total indebtedness in that year, also in billions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.3" } ]
CONVFINQA5497	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfor the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>1.85% ( 1.85 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>26.50</td><td>28.70</td><td>27.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.60</td><td>4.19</td><td>3.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>7.8</td><td>7.8</td><td>5.0</td></tr></table> compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\\\fc\\\\delivery_1024177\\\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .\nQuestion: what was the risk-free interest rate in 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.19" } ]
CONVFINQA7433	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>284.5</td><td>287.8</td><td>299.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>2.3</td><td>2.8</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations</td><td>286.8</td><td>290.6</td><td>303.1</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) . consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting . under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales . accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s . gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value . accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million . the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows . in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office . the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes . the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach . divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) . the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer . under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock . at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange . the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) . following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos . as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock . we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction . based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares . in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses . the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 . the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .\nQuestion: what was the change in weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2016 to 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-11.5" } ]
CONVFINQA7018	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses , or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of many of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions . net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>211</td><td>150</td><td>94</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>e.g .</td><td>36</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other africa</td><td>1950</td><td>1502</td><td>1089</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total africa</td><td>1986</td><td>1502</td><td>1089</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other international</td><td>88</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>2285</td><td>1652</td><td>1183</td></tr></table> oil sands mining segment we hold a 20 percent non-operated interest in the aosp , an oil sands mining and upgrading joint venture located in alberta , canada . the joint venture produces bitumen from oil sands deposits in the athabasca region utilizing mining techniques and upgrades the bitumen to synthetic crude oils and vacuum gas oil . the aosp 2019s mining and extraction assets are located near fort mcmurray , alberta , and include the muskeg river and the jackpine mines . gross design capacity of the combined mines is 255000 ( 51000 net to our interest ) barrels of bitumen per day . the aosp operations use established processes to mine oil sands deposits from an open-pit mine , extract the bitumen and upgrade it into synthetic crude oils . ore is mined using traditional truck and shovel mining techniques . the mined ore passes through primary crushers to reduce the ore chunks in size and is then sent to rotary breakers where the ore chunks are further reduced to smaller particles . the particles are combined with hot water to create slurry . the slurry moves through the extraction process where it separates into sand , clay and bitumen-rich froth . a solvent is added to the bitumen froth to separate out the remaining solids , water and heavy asphaltenes . the solvent washes the sand and produces clean bitumen that is required for the upgrader to run efficiently . the process yields a mixture of solvent and bitumen which is then transported from the mine to the scotford upgrader via the approximately 300-mile corridor pipeline . the aosp's scotford upgrader is located at fort saskatchewan , northeast of edmonton , alberta . the bitumen is upgraded at scotford using both hydrotreating and hydroconversion processes to remove sulfur and break the heavy bitumen molecules into lighter products . blendstocks acquired from outside sources are utilized in the production of our saleable products . the upgrader produces synthetic crude oils and vacuum gas oil . the vacuum gas oil is sold to an affiliate of the operator under a long-term contract at market-related prices , and the other products are sold in the marketplace . as of december 31 , 2014 , we own or have rights to participate in developed and undeveloped leases totaling approximately 163000 gross ( 33000 net ) acres . the underlying developed leases are held for the duration of the project , with royalties payable to the province of alberta . synthetic crude oil sales volumes for 2014 averaged 50 mbbld and net-of-royalty production was 41 mbbld . in december 2013 , a jackpine mine expansion project received conditional approval from the canadian government . the project includes additional mining areas , associated processing facilities and infrastructure . the government conditions relate to wildlife , the environment and aboriginal health issues . we will evaluate the potential expansion project and government conditions after infrastructure reliability initiatives are completed . the governments of alberta and canada have agreed to partially fund quest ccs for $ 865 million canadian . in the third quarter of 2012 , the energy and resources conservation board ( \"ercb\" ) , alberta's primary energy regulator at that time , conditionally approved the project and the aosp partners approved proceeding to construct and operate quest ccs . government funding commenced in 2012 and continued as milestones were achieved during the development , construction and operating phases . failure of the aosp to meet certain timing , performance and operating objectives may result in repaying some of the government funding . construction and commissioning of quest ccs is expected to be completed by late 2015. .\nQuestion: by what amount did net undeveloped acres decrease from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer: 633.0\nQuestion: and what were those net undeveloped acres in 2015?\nAnswer: 2285.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does that decrease amount represent in relation to these 2015 net undeveloped acres?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.27702" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.