Datasets:
dataset_info:
features:
- name: paper_id
dtype: string
- name: arxiv_id
dtype: string
- name: title
dtype: string
- name: markdown
struct:
- name: content
dtype: string
- name: metadata
struct:
- name: authors
sequence: string
- name: title
dtype: string
- name: total_chars
dtype: int64
- name: total_lines
dtype: int64
- name: updated_at
dtype: string
- name: reviews
list:
- name: id
dtype: string
- name: initial_rating
dtype: int64
- name: confidence
dtype: int64
- name: soundness
dtype: int64
- name: contribution
dtype: int64
- name: presentation
dtype: int64
- name: summary
dtype: string
- name: strengths
dtype: string
- name: weaknesses
dtype: string
- name: questions
dtype: string
- name: scores
struct:
- name: rating
dtype: string
- name: rating_avg
dtype: float64
- name: confidence
dtype: string
- name: confidence_avg
dtype: float64
- name: soundness
dtype: string
- name: soundness_avg
dtype: float64
- name: contribution
dtype: string
- name: contribution_avg
dtype: float64
- name: presentation
dtype: string
- name: presentation_avg
dtype: float64
- name: metadata
struct:
- name: primary_area
dtype: string
- name: track
dtype: string
- name: venue
dtype: string
- name: venueid
dtype: string
- name: processed_at
dtype: string
- name: meta_review
struct:
- name: id
dtype: string
- name: metareview
dtype: string
- name: additional_comments
dtype: string
- name: decision
struct:
- name: decision
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_examples: 4011
- name: test
num_examples: 1000
license: mit
task_categories:
- text-generation
language:
- en
tags:
- peer-review
- scientific-papers
- ICLR
- paper-review
- NLP
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
citation: |
@article{fang2026passive,
title={From Passive Generation to Investigation: A Proactive Scientific Peer Review Agent},
author={Fang, Haishuo and Feng, Yue and Gurevych, Iryna},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.13349},
year={2026}
}
ProReviewer Dataset
A version-matched dataset of ICLR paper submissions paired with their initial peer reviews and scores. Each sample contains the initial submission of a paper matched with the reviewers' initial ratings (before the discussion phase), enabling research on automated scientific peer review.
Dataset Description
This dataset supports training and evaluating automated peer review systems. All papers and reviews are version-matched: the paper content corresponds to the initial submission, and the review scores reflect the initial ratings assigned before any author-reviewer discussion.
Splits
| Split | Source | Samples | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| train | ICLR 2025 | 4,011 | Training set for RL/SFT |
| test | ICLR 2026 | 1,000 | Held-out evaluation set |
Features
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| paper_id | string | OpenReview paper ID |
| arxiv_id | string | arXiv identifier |
| title | string | Paper title |
| markdown | dict | Paper content (initial submission) in markdown with metadata (authors, char/line counts) |
| reviews | list | List of peer reviews (see below) |
| scores | dict | Aggregated initial scores across reviewers (rating_avg, confidence_avg, etc.) |
| metadata | dict | Submission metadata (primary_area, track, venue) |
| meta_review | dict | Area chair meta-review and additional comments |
| decision | dict | Final acceptance decision (e.g., Accept (Poster), Reject) |
Each review contains:
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| id | string | Reviewer ID |
| initial_rating | int | Rating before discussion (1-10) |
| confidence | int | Reviewer confidence score |
| soundness | int | Technical soundness score |
| contribution | int | Contribution significance score |
| presentation | int | Presentation quality score |
| summary | string | Paper summary by reviewer |
| strengths | string | Identified strengths |
| weaknesses | string | Identified weaknesses |
| questions | string | Questions for the authors |
Usage
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("UKPLab/ProReviewer-Dataset")
# Access a training sample
paper = ds["train"][0]
print(paper["title"])
print(f"Avg initial rating: {paper['scores']['rating_avg']}")
print(f"Decision: {paper['decision']['decision']}")
print(f"Number of reviews: {len(paper['reviews'])}")
# Read paper content (initial submission)
content = paper["markdown"]["content"]
# Access individual reviews
for review in paper["reviews"]:
print(f"Initial rating: {review['initial_rating']}, Confidence: {review['confidence']}")
Version Matching
All data is version-matched to ensure consistency:
- Paper content: Corresponds to the initial submission (before any revisions in response to reviews)
- Review scores: Reflect the initial ratings assigned by reviewers (before the discussion/rebuttal phase)
This version matching is important for training review agents, as it ensures the model learns to evaluate papers as they were first submitted, with scores that reflect first impressions rather than post-discussion adjustments.
Source
Papers and reviews were collected from OpenReview for the ICLR 2025 and ICLR 2026 venues.
Associated Resources
- Paper: From Passive Generation to Investigation: A Proactive Scientific Peer Review Agent
- Code: UKPLab/arxiv2026-ProReviewer
Citation
@article{fang2026passive,
title={From Passive Generation to Investigation: A Proactive Scientific Peer Review Agent},
author={Fang, Haishuo and Feng, Yue and Gurevych, Iryna},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.13349},
year={2026}
}
License
This dataset is released under the MIT License.