blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
04447b3ab86d769ee6d60c583bc1b00cac9fbf5c | aa3f8992ef7806974bc1ffd468baa0c79f4d6643 | /library/hott/equiv_precomp.lean | 376115ab5acccedd34138b1726495828e1452369 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean | 7f8dff750722c5382bdd0a9a9275dc4bb2c58dd3 | 0cca265db19f7296531e339192e9b9bae4a31f8b | refs/heads/master | 1,610,909,964,159 | 1,407,084,399,000 | 1,416,857,075,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,267 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2014 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Author: Jakob von Raumer
-- Ported from Coq HoTT
import hott.equiv hott.axioms.funext
open path function funext
namespace IsEquiv
context
--Precomposition of arbitrary functions with f
definition precomp {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (C : Type) (h : B → C) : A → C := h ∘ f
--Postcomposition of arbitrary functions with f
definition postcomp {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (C : Type) (l : C → A) : C → B := f ∘ l
--Precomposing with an equivalence is an equivalence
definition precompose [instance] {A B : Type} (f : A → B) [F : funext] [Hf : IsEquiv f] (C : Type):
IsEquiv (precomp f C) :=
adjointify (precomp f C) (λh, h ∘ f⁻¹)
(λh, path_forall _ _ (λx, ap h (sect f x)))
(λg, path_forall _ _ (λy, ap g (retr f y)))
--Postcomposing with an equivalence is an equivalence
definition postcompose [instance] {A B : Type} (f : A → B) [F : funext] [Hf : IsEquiv f] (C : Type):
IsEquiv (postcomp f C) :=
adjointify (postcomp f C) (λl, f⁻¹ ∘ l)
(λh, path_forall _ _ (λx, retr f (h x)))
(λg, path_forall _ _ (λy, sect f (g y)))
--Conversely, if pre- or post-composing with a function is always an equivalence,
--then that function is also an equivalence. It's convenient to know
--that we only need to assume the equivalence when the other type is
--the domain or the codomain.
protected definition isequiv_precompose_eq {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (C D : Type) (Ceq : IsEquiv (precomp f C))
(Deq : IsEquiv (precomp f D)) (k : C → D) (h : A → C) :
k ∘ (inv (precomp f C)) h ≈ (inv (precomp f D)) (k ∘ h) :=
let invD := inv (precomp f D) in
let invC := inv (precomp f C) in
have eq1 : invD (k ∘ h) ≈ k ∘ (invC h),
from calc invD (k ∘ h) ≈ invD (k ∘ (precomp f C (invC h))) : retr (precomp f C) h
... ≈ k ∘ (invC h) : !sect,
eq1⁻¹
definition isequiv_precompose {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (Aeq : IsEquiv (precomp f A))
(Beq : IsEquiv (precomp f B)) : (IsEquiv f) :=
let invA := inv (precomp f A) in
let invB := inv (precomp f B) in
let sect' : Sect (invA id) f := (λx,
calc f (invA id x) ≈ (f ∘ invA id) x : idp
... ≈ invB (f ∘ id) x : apD10 (!isequiv_precompose_eq)
... ≈ invB (precomp f B id) x : idp
... ≈ x : apD10 (sect (precomp f B) id))
in
let retr' : Sect f (invA id) := (λx,
calc invA id (f x) ≈ precomp f A (invA id) x : idp
... ≈ x : apD10 (retr (precomp f A) id)) in
adjointify f (invA id) sect' retr'
end
end IsEquiv
--Bundled versions of the previous theorems
namespace Equiv
definition precompose [F : funext] {A B C : Type} {eqf : A ≃ B}
: (B → C) ≃ (A → C) :=
let f := equiv_fun eqf in
let Hf := equiv_isequiv eqf in
Equiv.mk (IsEquiv.precomp f C)
(@IsEquiv.precompose A B f F Hf C)
definition postcompose [F : funext] {A B C : Type} {eqf : A ≃ B}
: (C → A) ≃ (C → B) :=
let f := equiv_fun eqf in
let Hf := equiv_isequiv eqf in
Equiv.mk (IsEquiv.postcomp f C)
(@IsEquiv.postcompose A B f F Hf C)
end Equiv
|
6ff94ad29e0910ee1b51d44d6e83312401a5beca | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/ring_theory/polynomial/vieta.lean | 16511dfa7ead16c9a808b978c1b5ebafa9e21583 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,383 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Hanting Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hanting Zhang
-/
import ring_theory.polynomial.basic
import ring_theory.polynomial.symmetric
/-!
# Vieta's Formula
The main result is `vieta.prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm`, which shows that the product of linear terms
`λ + X i` is equal to a linear combination of the symmetric polynomials `esymm σ R j`.
## Implementation Notes:
We first take the viewpoint where the "roots" `X i` are variables. This means we work over
`polynomial (mv_polynomial σ R)`, which enables us to talk about linear combinations of
`esymm σ R j`. We then derive Vieta's formula in `polynomial R` by giving a
valuation from each `X i` to `r i`.
-/
universes u
open_locale big_operators polynomial
open finset polynomial fintype
namespace mv_polynomial
variables {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R]
variables (σ : Type u) [fintype σ]
/-- A sum version of Vieta's formula. Viewing `X i` as variables,
the product of linear terms `λ + X i` is equal to a linear combination of
the symmetric polynomials `esymm σ R j`. -/
lemma prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm :
(∏ i : σ, (polynomial.C (X i) + polynomial.X) : polynomial (mv_polynomial σ R) )=
∑ j in range (card σ + 1),
(polynomial.C (esymm σ R j) * polynomial.X ^ (card σ - j)) :=
begin
classical,
rw [prod_add, sum_powerset],
refine sum_congr begin congr end (λ j hj, _),
rw [esymm, map_sum, sum_mul],
refine sum_congr rfl (λ t ht, _),
have h : (univ \ t).card = card σ - j :=
by { rw card_sdiff (mem_powerset_len.mp ht).1, congr, exact (mem_powerset_len.mp ht).2 },
rw [map_prod, prod_const, ← h],
congr,
end
/-- A fully expanded sum version of Vieta's formula, evaluated at the roots.
The product of linear terms `X + r i` is equal to `∑ j in range (n + 1), e_j * X ^ (n - j)`,
where `e_j` is the `j`th symmetric polynomial of the constant terms `r i`. -/
lemma prod_X_add_C_eval (r : σ → R) : ∏ i : σ, (polynomial.C (r i) + polynomial.X) =
∑ i in range (card σ + 1), (∑ t in powerset_len i (univ : finset σ),
∏ i in t, polynomial.C (r i)) * polynomial.X ^ (card σ - i) :=
begin
classical,
have h := @prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm _ _ σ _,
apply_fun (polynomial.map (eval r)) at h,
rw [polynomial.map_prod, polynomial.map_sum] at h,
convert h,
simp only [eval_X, polynomial.map_add, polynomial.map_C, polynomial.map_X, eq_self_iff_true],
funext,
simp only [function.funext_iff, esymm, polynomial.map_C, polynomial.map_sum, map_sum,
polynomial.map_C, polynomial.map_pow, polynomial.map_X, polynomial.map_mul],
congr,
funext,
simp only [eval_prod, eval_X, map_prod],
end
lemma esymm_to_sum (r : σ → R) (j : ℕ) : polynomial.C (eval r (esymm σ R j)) =
∑ t in powerset_len j (univ : finset σ), ∏ i in t, polynomial.C (r i) :=
by simp only [esymm, eval_sum, eval_prod, eval_X, map_sum, map_prod]
/-- Vieta's formula for the coefficients of the product of linear terms `X + r i`,
The `k`th coefficient is `∑ t in powerset_len (card σ - k) (univ : finset σ), ∏ i in t, r i`,
i.e. the symmetric polynomial `esymm σ R (card σ - k)` of the constant terms `r i`. -/
lemma prod_X_add_C_coeff (r : σ → R) (k : ℕ) (h : k ≤ card σ):
polynomial.coeff (∏ i : σ, (polynomial.C (r i) + polynomial.X)) k =
∑ t in powerset_len (card σ - k) (univ : finset σ), ∏ i in t, r i :=
begin
have hk : filter (λ (x : ℕ), k = card σ - x) (range (card σ + 1)) = {card σ - k} :=
begin
refine finset.ext (λ a, ⟨λ ha, _, λ ha, _ ⟩),
rw mem_singleton,
have hσ := (tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le (mem_range_succ_iff.mp
(mem_filter.mp ha).1)).mp ((mem_filter.mp ha).2).symm,
symmetry,
rwa [(tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le h), add_comm],
rw mem_filter,
have haσ : a ∈ range (card σ + 1) :=
by { rw mem_singleton.mp ha, exact mem_range_succ_iff.mpr (@tsub_le_self _ _ _ _ _ k) },
refine ⟨haσ, eq.symm _⟩,
rw tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le (mem_range_succ_iff.mp haσ),
have hσ := (tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le h).mp (mem_singleton.mp ha).symm,
rwa add_comm,
end,
simp only [prod_X_add_C_eval, ← esymm_to_sum, finset_sum_coeff, coeff_C_mul_X_pow, sum_ite, hk,
sum_singleton, esymm, eval_sum, eval_prod, eval_X, add_zero, sum_const_zero],
end
end mv_polynomial
|
dab2553b818f9b0a67ed78e42a868baaaa3aba6d | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/data/set/intervals/image_preimage_auto.lean | 148c20cc94bac8ba04d48a2a1241dbca34acf432 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,642 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.data.set.intervals.basic
import Mathlib.data.equiv.mul_add
import Mathlib.algebra.pointwise
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# (Pre)images of intervals
In this file we prove a bunch of trivial lemmas like “if we add `a` to all points of `[b, c]`,
then we get `[a + b, a + c]`”. For the functions `x ↦ x ± a`, `x ↦ a ± x`, and `x ↦ -x` we prove
lemmas about preimages and images of all intervals. We also prove a few lemmas about images under
`x ↦ a * x`, `x ↦ x * a` and `x ↦ x⁻¹`.
-/
namespace set
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_add_Ici {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => iff.symm sub_le_iff_le_add'
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => iff.symm sub_lt_iff_lt_add'
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_add_Iic {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => iff.symm le_sub_iff_add_le'
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_add_Iio {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => iff.symm lt_sub_iff_add_lt'
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_add_Icc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_add_Ico {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp] theorem preimage_add_const_Ici {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => iff.symm sub_le_iff_le_add
@[simp] theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => iff.symm sub_lt_iff_lt_add
@[simp] theorem preimage_add_const_Iic {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => iff.symm le_sub_iff_add_le
@[simp] theorem preimage_add_const_Iio {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => iff.symm lt_sub_iff_add_lt
@[simp] theorem preimage_add_const_Icc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_add_const_Ico {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ -x`
-/
@[simp] theorem preimage_neg_Ici {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) :
-Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => le_neg
@[simp] theorem preimage_neg_Iic {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) :
-Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => neg_le
@[simp] theorem preimage_neg_Ioi {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) :
-Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => lt_neg
@[simp] theorem preimage_neg_Iio {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) :
-Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun (x : G) => neg_lt
@[simp] theorem preimage_neg_Icc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
-Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_neg_Ico {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
-Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_neg_Ioc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
-Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_neg_Ioo {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
-Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) :=
sorry
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp] theorem preimage_sub_const_Ici {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x - a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b + a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioi {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_sub_const_Iic {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x - a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b + a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_sub_const_Iio {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x - a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b + a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_sub_const_Icc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x - a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_sub_const_Ico {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x - a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioo {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) :=
sorry
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_sub_Ici {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a - x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
ext fun (x : G) => le_sub
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_sub_Iic {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a - x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
ext fun (x : G) => sub_le
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioi {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
ext fun (x : G) => lt_sub
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_sub_Iio {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a - x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
ext fun (x : G) => sub_lt
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_sub_Icc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a - x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_sub_Ico {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a - x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioo {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) :=
sorry
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp] theorem image_const_add_Ici {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a + x) '' Ici b = Ici (a + b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_add_Iic {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a + x) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_add_Iio {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a + x) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_add_Ioi {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a + x) '' Ioi b = Ioi (a + b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_add_Icc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a + x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a + b) (a + c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_add_Ico {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a + x) '' Ico b c = Ico (a + b) (a + c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_add_Ioc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a + x) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (a + b) (a + c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_add_Ioo {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a + x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a + b) (a + c) :=
sorry
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp] theorem image_add_const_Ici {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x + a) '' Ici b = Ici (a + b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_add_const_Iic {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x + a) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_add_const_Iio {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x + a) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_add_const_Ioi {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x + a) '' Ioi b = Ioi (a + b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_add_const_Icc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x + a) '' Icc b c = Icc (a + b) (a + c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_add_const_Ico {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x + a) '' Ico b c = Ico (a + b) (a + c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_add_const_Ioc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x + a) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (a + b) (a + c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_add_const_Ioo {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x + a) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a + b) (a + c) :=
sorry
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ -x`
-/
theorem image_neg_Ici {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) :
Neg.neg '' Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
sorry
theorem image_neg_Iic {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) :
Neg.neg '' Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
sorry
theorem image_neg_Ioi {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) :
Neg.neg '' Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
sorry
theorem image_neg_Iio {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) :
Neg.neg '' Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
sorry
theorem image_neg_Icc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
Neg.neg '' Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) :=
sorry
theorem image_neg_Ico {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
Neg.neg '' Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) :=
sorry
theorem image_neg_Ioc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
Neg.neg '' Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) :=
sorry
theorem image_neg_Ioo {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
Neg.neg '' Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) :=
sorry
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp] theorem image_const_sub_Ici {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a - x) '' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_sub_Iic {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a - x) '' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_sub_Ioi {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a - x) '' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_sub_Iio {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => a - x) '' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_sub_Icc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a - x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_sub_Ico {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a - x) '' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_sub_Ioc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a - x) '' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_const_sub_Ioo {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => a - x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) :=
sorry
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp] theorem image_sub_const_Ici {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x - a) '' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_sub_const_Iic {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x - a) '' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_sub_const_Ioi {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x - a) '' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_sub_const_Iio {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G) :
(fun (x : G) => x - a) '' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_sub_const_Icc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x - a) '' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_sub_const_Ico {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x - a) '' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_sub_const_Ioc {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x - a) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem image_sub_const_Ioo {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a : G) (b : G)
(c : G) : (fun (x : G) => x - a) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) :=
sorry
/-!
### Multiplication and inverse in a field
-/
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (lt_div_iff h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (div_lt_iff h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (le_div_iff h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (div_le_iff h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : c < 0) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (div_lt_iff_of_neg h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : c < 0) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (lt_div_iff_of_neg h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : c < 0) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (div_le_iff_of_neg h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : c < 0) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (le_div_iff_of_neg h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k)
{c : k} (h : c < 0) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k)
{c : k} (h : c < 0) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ico (b / c) (a / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k)
{c : k} (h : c < 0) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k)
{c : k} (h : c < 0) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (b / c) (a / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Iio {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (lt_div_iff' h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioi {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (div_lt_iff' h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Iic {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (le_div_iff' h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Ici {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun (x : k) => iff.symm (div_le_iff' h)
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioo {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioc {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Ico {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Icc {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Iio_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : c < 0) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Iio a = Ioi (a / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioi_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : c < 0) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Ioi a = Iio (a / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Iic_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : c < 0) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Iic a = Ici (a / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Ici_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) {c : k}
(h : c < 0) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Ici a = Iic (a / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k)
{c : k} (h : c < 0) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioc_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k)
{c : k} (h : c < 0) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ico (b / c) (a / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Ico_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k)
{c : k} (h : c < 0) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_mul_Icc_of_neg {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k)
{c : k} (h : c < 0) : Mul.mul c ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (b / c) (a / c) :=
sorry
theorem image_mul_right_Icc' {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] (a : k) (b : k) {c : k}
(h : 0 < c) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) '' Icc a b = Icc (a * c) (b * c) :=
sorry
theorem image_mul_right_Icc {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] {a : k} {b : k} {c : k}
(hab : a ≤ b) (hc : 0 ≤ c) : (fun (x : k) => x * c) '' Icc a b = Icc (a * c) (b * c) :=
sorry
theorem image_mul_left_Icc' {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] {a : k} (h : 0 < a) (b : k)
(c : k) : Mul.mul a '' Icc b c = Icc (a * b) (a * c) :=
sorry
theorem image_mul_left_Icc {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] {a : k} {b : k} {c : k}
(ha : 0 ≤ a) (hbc : b ≤ c) : Mul.mul a '' Icc b c = Icc (a * b) (a * c) :=
sorry
/-- The image under `inv` of `Ioo 0 a` is `Ioi a⁻¹`. -/
theorem image_inv_Ioo_0_left {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k] {a : k} (ha : 0 < a) :
has_inv.inv '' Ioo 0 a = Ioi (a⁻¹) :=
sorry
end Mathlib |
21a3f2b718620786c6e9816ad056823bb8705e39 | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /src/Lean/Elab/PreDefinition/Structural/Eqns.lean | a7cd2b5d44155497036f0d81e8f42fd0a6d02bcc | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,444 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Eqns
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Split
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Apply
import Lean.Elab.PreDefinition.Basic
import Lean.Elab.PreDefinition.Structural.Basic
namespace Lean.Elab
open Meta
/-- Try to close goal using `rfl` with smart unfolding turned off. -/
def tryURefl (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM Bool :=
withOptions (smartUnfolding.set . false) do
try applyRefl mvarId; return true catch _ => return false
/-- Delta reduce the equation left-hand-side -/
def deltaLHS (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM MVarId := withMVarContext mvarId do
let target ← getMVarType' mvarId
let some (_, lhs, rhs) ← target.eq? | throwTacticEx `deltaLHS mvarId "equality expected"
let some lhs ← delta? lhs | throwTacticEx `deltaLHS mvarId "failed to delta reduce lhs"
replaceTargetDefEq mvarId (← mkEq lhs rhs)
def deltaRHS? (mvarId : MVarId) (declName : Name) : MetaM (Option MVarId) := withMVarContext mvarId do
let target ← getMVarType' mvarId
let some (_, lhs, rhs) ← target.eq? | throwTacticEx `deltaRHS mvarId "equality expected"
let some rhs ← delta? rhs.consumeMData (. == declName) | return none
replaceTargetDefEq mvarId (← mkEq lhs rhs)
private partial def whnfAux (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
let e ← whnfR e
match e with
| Expr.proj _ _ s _ => e.updateProj! (← whnfAux s)
| _ => e
/-- Apply `whnfR` to lhs, return `none` if `lhs` was not modified -/
def whnfReducibleLHS? (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM (Option MVarId) := withMVarContext mvarId do
let target ← getMVarType' mvarId
let some (_, lhs, rhs) ← target.eq? | throwTacticEx `whnfReducibleLHS mvarId "equality expected"
let lhs' ← whnfAux lhs
if lhs' != lhs then
return some (← replaceTargetDefEq mvarId (← mkEq lhs' rhs))
else
return none
def tryContradiction (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM Bool := do
try contradiction mvarId { genDiseq := true }; return true catch _ => return false
namespace Structural
structure EqnInfo where
declName : Name
levelParams : List Name
type : Expr
value : Expr
recArgPos : Nat
deriving Inhabited
private partial def expand : Expr → Expr
| Expr.letE _ t v b _ => expand (b.instantiate1 v)
| Expr.mdata _ b _ => expand b
| e => e
private def expandRHS? (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM (Option MVarId) := do
let target ← getMVarType' mvarId
let some (_, lhs, rhs) ← target.eq? | return none
unless rhs.isLet || rhs.isMData do return none
return some (← replaceTargetDefEq mvarId (← mkEq lhs (expand rhs)))
private def funext? (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM (Option MVarId) := do
let target ← getMVarType' mvarId
let some (_, lhs, rhs) ← target.eq? | return none
unless rhs.isLambda do return none
commitWhenSome? do
let [mvarId] ← apply mvarId (← mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels ``funext) | return none
let (_, mvarId) ← intro1 mvarId
return some mvarId
private def simpMatch? (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM (Option MVarId) := do
let mvarId' ← Split.simpMatchTarget mvarId
if mvarId != mvarId' then return some mvarId' else return none
private def simpIf? (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM (Option MVarId) := do
let mvarId' ← simpIfTarget mvarId (useDecide := true)
if mvarId != mvarId' then return some mvarId' else return none
/--
Auxiliary method for `mkEqnTypes`. We should "keep going"/"processing" the goal
`... |- f ... = rhs` at `mkEqnTypes` IF `rhs` contains a `f` application containing loose bound
variables. We do that to make sure we can create an elimination principle for `f` based
on the generated equations.
Remark: we have considered using the same heuristic used in the `BRecOn` module.
That is we would do case-analysis on the `match` application because the recursive
argument (may) depend on it. We abandoned this approach because it was incompatible
with the generation of induction principles.
Remark: we could also always return `true` here, and split **all** match expressions on the `rhs`
even if they are not relevant for the `brecOn` construction.
TODO: reconsider this design decision in the future.
Another possible design option is to "split" other control structures such as `if-then-else`.
-/
private def keepGoing (mvarId : MVarId) : ReaderT EqnInfo (StateRefT (Array Expr) MetaM) Bool := do
let target ← getMVarType' mvarId
let some (_, lhs, rhs) ← target.eq? | return false
let ctx ← read
return Option.isSome <| rhs.find? fun e => e.isAppOf ctx.declName && e.hasLooseBVars
private def saveEqn (mvarId : MVarId) : StateRefT (Array Expr) MetaM Unit := withMVarContext mvarId do
let target ← getMVarType' mvarId
let fvarState := collectFVars {} target
let fvarState ← (← getLCtx).foldrM (init := fvarState) fun decl fvarState => do
if fvarState.fvarSet.contains decl.fvarId then
collectFVars fvarState (← instantiateMVars decl.type)
else
fvarState
let mut fvarIds ← sortFVarIds <| fvarState.fvarSet.toArray
-- Include propositions that are not in fvarState.fvarSet, and only contains variables in
for decl in (← getLCtx) do
unless fvarState.fvarSet.contains decl.fvarId do
if (← isProp decl.type) then
let type ← instantiateMVars decl.type
let missing? := type.find? fun e => e.isFVar && !fvarState.fvarSet.contains e.fvarId!
if missing?.isNone then
fvarIds := fvarIds.push decl.fvarId
let type ← mkForallFVars (fvarIds.map mkFVar) target
modify (·.push type)
private partial def mkEqnTypes (mvarId : MVarId) : ReaderT EqnInfo (StateRefT (Array Expr) MetaM) Unit := do
if !(← keepGoing mvarId) then
saveEqn mvarId
else if let some mvarId ← expandRHS? mvarId then
mkEqnTypes mvarId
else if let some mvarId ← funext? mvarId then
mkEqnTypes mvarId
else if let some mvarId ← simpMatch? mvarId then
mkEqnTypes mvarId
else if let some mvarIds ← splitTarget? mvarId then
mvarIds.forM mkEqnTypes
else
saveEqn mvarId
/-- Create a "unique" base name for equations and splitter -/
private def mkBaseNameFor (env : Environment) (declName : Name) : Name :=
Lean.mkBaseNameFor env declName `eq_1 `_eqns
private partial def mkProof (declName : Name) (type : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
trace[Elab.definition.structural.eqns] "proving: {type}"
withNewMCtxDepth do
let main ← mkFreshExprSyntheticOpaqueMVar type
let (_, mvarId) ← intros main.mvarId!
unless (← tryURefl mvarId) do -- catch easy cases
go (← deltaLHS mvarId)
instantiateMVars main
where
go (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM Unit := do
trace[Elab.definition.structural.eqns] "step\n{MessageData.ofGoal mvarId}"
if (← tryURefl mvarId) then
return ()
else if (← tryContradiction mvarId) then
return ()
else if let some mvarId ← simpMatch? mvarId then
go mvarId
else if let some mvarId ← simpIf? mvarId then
go mvarId
else if let some mvarId ← whnfReducibleLHS? mvarId then
go mvarId
else if let some mvarId ← deltaRHS? mvarId declName then
go mvarId
else if let some mvarIds ← casesOnStuckLHS? mvarId then
mvarIds.forM go
else
throwError "failed to generate equational theorem for '{declName}'\n{MessageData.ofGoal mvarId}"
def mkEqns (info : EqnInfo) : MetaM (Array Name) := do
withOptions (tactic.hygienic.set . false) do
let eqnTypes ← withNewMCtxDepth <| lambdaTelescope info.value fun xs body => do
let us := info.levelParams.map mkLevelParam
let target ← mkEq (mkAppN (Lean.mkConst info.declName us) xs) body
let goal ← mkFreshExprSyntheticOpaqueMVar target
let (_, eqnTypes) ← mkEqnTypes goal.mvarId! |>.run info |>.run #[]
return eqnTypes
let baseName := mkBaseNameFor (← getEnv) info.declName
let mut thmNames := #[]
for i in [: eqnTypes.size] do
let type := eqnTypes[i]
trace[Elab.definition.structural.eqns] "{eqnTypes[i]}"
let name := baseName ++ (`eq).appendIndexAfter (i+1)
thmNames := thmNames.push name
let value ← mkProof info.declName type
addDecl <| Declaration.thmDecl {
name, type, value
levelParams := info.levelParams
}
return thmNames
builtin_initialize eqnInfoExt : MapDeclarationExtension EqnInfo ← mkMapDeclarationExtension `structEqInfo
def registerEqnsInfo (preDef : PreDefinition) (recArgPos : Nat) : CoreM Unit := do
modifyEnv fun env => eqnInfoExt.insert env preDef.declName { preDef with recArgPos }
structure EqnsExtState where
map : Std.PHashMap Name (Array Name) := {}
deriving Inhabited
/- We generate the equations on demand, and do not save them on .olean files. -/
builtin_initialize eqnsExt : EnvExtension EqnsExtState ←
registerEnvExtension (pure {})
def getEqnsFor? (declName : Name) : MetaM (Option (Array Name)) := do
let env ← getEnv
if let some eqs := eqnsExt.getState env |>.map.find? declName then
return some eqs
else if let some info := eqnInfoExt.find? env declName then
let eqs ← mkEqns info
modifyEnv fun env => eqnsExt.modifyState env fun s => { s with map := s.map.insert declName eqs }
return some eqs
else
return none
builtin_initialize
registerGetEqnsFn getEqnsFor?
registerTraceClass `Elab.definition.structural.eqns
end Structural
end Lean.Elab
|
d6e2a7b91423c170015940eb745563b80b31003c | 1abd1ed12aa68b375cdef28959f39531c6e95b84 | /src/data/set/lattice.lean | 93ab94fc06a5e32ae7a27382e9c9d1f59f9c7571 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jumpy4/mathlib | d3829e75173012833e9f15ac16e481e17596de0f | af36f1a35f279f0e5b3c2a77647c6bf2cfd51a13 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,508,842,818 | 1,636,203,271,000 | 1,636,203,271,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 61,210 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.nat.basic
import order.complete_boolean_algebra
import order.directed
import order.galois_connection
/-!
# The set lattice
This file provides usual set notation for unions and intersections, a `complete_lattice` instance
for `set α`, and some more set constructions.
## Main declarations
* `set.Union`: Union of an indexed family of sets.
* `set.Inter`: Intersection of an indexed family of sets.
* `set.sInter`: **s**et **Inter**. Intersection of sets belonging to a set of sets.
* `set.sUnion`: **s**et **Union**. Union of sets belonging to a set of sets. This is actually
defined in core Lean.
* `set.sInter_eq_bInter`, `set.sUnion_eq_bInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `set.complete_boolean_algebra`: `set α` is a `complete_boolean_algebra` with `≤ = ⊆`, `< = ⊂`,
`⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference. See `set.boolean_algebra`.
* `set.kern_image`: For a function `f : α → β`, `s.kern_image f` is the set of `y` such that
`f ⁻¹ y ⊆ s`.
* `set.seq`: Union of the image of a set under a **seq**uence of functions. `seq s t` is the union
of `f '' t` over all `f ∈ s`, where `t : set α` and `s : set (α → β)`.
* `set.Union_eq_sigma_of_disjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `set.Union`
* `⋂`: `set.Inter`
* `⋃₀`: `set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `set.sInter`
-/
open function tactic set auto
universes u
variables {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*}
namespace set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
instance : has_Inf (set α) := ⟨λ s, {a | ∀ t ∈ s, a ∈ t}⟩
instance : has_Sup (set α) := ⟨sUnion⟩
/-- Intersection of a set of sets. -/
def sInter (S : set (set α)) : set α := Inf S
prefix `⋂₀`:110 := sInter
@[simp] theorem mem_sInter {x : α} {S : set (set α)} : x ∈ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, x ∈ t := iff.rfl
/-- Indexed union of a family of sets -/
def Union (s : ι → set β) : set β := supr s
/-- Indexed intersection of a family of sets -/
def Inter (s : ι → set β) : set β := infi s
notation `⋃` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, Union f) := r
notation `⋂` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, Inter f) := r
@[simp] lemma Sup_eq_sUnion (S : set (set α)) : Sup S = ⋃₀ S := rfl
@[simp] lemma Inf_eq_sInter (S : set (set α)) : Inf S = ⋂₀ S := rfl
@[simp] lemma supr_eq_Union (s : ι → set α) : supr s = Union s := rfl
@[simp] lemma infi_eq_Inter (s : ι → set α) : infi s = Inter s := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_Union {x : β} {s : ι → set β} : x ∈ Union s ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ s i :=
⟨λ ⟨t, ⟨⟨a, (t_eq : s a = t)⟩, (h : x ∈ t)⟩⟩, ⟨a, t_eq.symm ▸ h⟩,
λ ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨s a, ⟨⟨a, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_Inter {x : β} {s : ι → set β} : x ∈ Inter s ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ s i :=
⟨λ (h : ∀ a ∈ {a : set β | ∃ i, s i = a}, x ∈ a) a, h (s a) ⟨a, rfl⟩,
λ h t ⟨a, (eq : s a = t)⟩, eq ▸ h a⟩
theorem mem_sUnion {x : α} {S : set (set α)} : x ∈ ⋃₀ S ↔ ∃ t ∈ S, x ∈ t := iff.rfl
instance : complete_boolean_algebra (set α) :=
{ Sup := Sup,
Inf := Inf,
le_Sup := λ s t t_in a a_in, ⟨t, ⟨t_in, a_in⟩⟩,
Sup_le := λ s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩, h t' t'_in a_in,
le_Inf := λ s t h a a_in t' t'_in, h t' t'_in a_in,
Inf_le := λ s t t_in a h, h _ t_in,
infi_sup_le_sup_Inf := λ s S x, iff.mp $ by simp [forall_or_distrib_left],
inf_Sup_le_supr_inf := λ s S x, iff.mp $ by simp [exists_and_distrib_left],
.. set.boolean_algebra,
.. pi.complete_lattice }
/-- `set.image` is monotone. See `set.image_image` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : monotone (image f) :=
λ s t, image_subset _
theorem monotone_inter [preorder β] {f g : β → set α}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λ x, f x ∩ g x) :=
λ b₁ b₂ h, inter_subset_inter (hf h) (hg h)
theorem monotone_union [preorder β] {f g : β → set α}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λ x, f x ∪ g x) :=
λ b₁ b₂ h, union_subset_union (hf h) (hg h)
theorem monotone_set_of [preorder α] {p : α → β → Prop}
(hp : ∀ b, monotone (λ a, p a b)) : monotone (λ a, {b | p a b}) :=
λ a a' h b, hp b h
section galois_connection
variables {f : α → β}
protected lemma image_preimage : galois_connection (image f) (preimage f) :=
λ a b, image_subset_iff
/-- `kern_image f s` is the set of `y` such that `f ⁻¹ y ⊆ s`. -/
def kern_image (f : α → β) (s : set α) : set β := {y | ∀ ⦃x⦄, f x = y → x ∈ s}
protected lemma preimage_kern_image : galois_connection (preimage f) (kern_image f) :=
λ a b,
⟨ λ h x hx y hy, have f y ∈ a, from hy.symm ▸ hx, h this,
λ h x (hx : f x ∈ a), h hx rfl⟩
end galois_connection
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr] theorem Union_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → set α} {f₂ : q → set α}
(pq : p ↔ q) (f : ∀x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : Union f₁ = Union f₂ :=
supr_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr] theorem Inter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → set α} {f₂ : q → set α}
(pq : p ↔ q) (f : ∀x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : Inter f₁ = Inter f₂ :=
infi_congr_Prop pq f
lemma Union_eq_if {p : Prop} [decidable p] (s : set α) :
(⋃ h : p, s) = if p then s else ∅ :=
supr_eq_if _
lemma Union_eq_dif {p : Prop} [decidable p] (s : p → set α) :
(⋃ (h : p), s h) = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
supr_eq_dif _
lemma Inter_eq_if {p : Prop} [decidable p] (s : set α) :
(⋂ h : p, s) = if p then s else univ :=
infi_eq_if _
lemma Infi_eq_dif {p : Prop} [decidable p] (s : p → set α) :
(⋂ (h : p), s h) = if h : p then s h else univ :=
infi_eq_dif _
lemma exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : set ι) (s : ι → set β)
(w : (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⊤) (x : β) :
∃ (i ∈ t), x ∈ s i :=
begin
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := set.mem_univ x,
simpa only [←w, set.mem_Union] using p,
end
lemma nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty
{ι : Type*} (t : set ι) (s : ι → set α) (H : nonempty α) (w : (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⊤) :
t.nonempty :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some,
exact ⟨x, m⟩,
end
theorem set_of_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : {x | ∃ i, p i x} = ⋃ i, {x | p i x} :=
ext $ λ i, mem_Union.symm
theorem set_of_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : {x | ∀ i, p i x} = ⋂ i, {x | p i x} :=
ext $ λ i, mem_Inter.symm
theorem Union_subset {s : ι → set β} {t : set β} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : (⋃ i, s i) ⊆ t :=
-- TODO: should be simpler when sets' order is based on lattices
@supr_le (set β) _ _ _ _ h
@[simp] theorem Union_subset_iff {s : ι → set β} {t : set β} : (⋃ i, s i) ⊆ t ↔ (∀ i, s i ⊆ t) :=
⟨λ h i, subset.trans (le_supr s _) h, Union_subset⟩
theorem mem_Inter_of_mem {x : β} {s : ι → set β} : (∀ i, x ∈ s i) → (x ∈ ⋂ i, s i) :=
mem_Inter.2
theorem subset_Inter {t : set β} {s : ι → set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
@le_infi (set β) _ _ _ _ h
@[simp] theorem subset_Inter_iff {t : set β} {s : ι → set β} : t ⊆ (⋂ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, t ⊆ s i :=
@le_infi_iff (set β) _ _ _ _
theorem subset_Union : ∀ (s : ι → set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) := le_supr
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_Union`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_subset_Union
{A : set β} {s : ι → set β} (i : ι) (h : A ⊆ s i) : A ⊆ ⋃ (i : ι), s i :=
h.trans (subset_Union s i)
theorem Inter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → set β) (i : ι), (⋂ i, s i) ⊆ s i := infi_le
lemma Inter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → set α} {t : set α} (i : ι)
(h : s i ⊆ t) : (⋂ i, s i) ⊆ t :=
set.subset.trans (set.Inter_subset s i) h
lemma Inter_subset_Inter {s t : ι → set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) :
(⋂ i, s i) ⊆ (⋂ i, t i) :=
set.subset_Inter $ λ i, set.Inter_subset_of_subset i (h i)
lemma Inter_subset_Inter2 {s : ι → set α} {t : ι' → set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
(⋂ i, s i) ⊆ (⋂ j, t j) :=
set.subset_Inter $ λ j, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j in Inter_subset_of_subset i hi
lemma Inter_set_of (P : ι → α → Prop) : (⋂ i, {x : α | P i x}) = {x : α | ∀ i, P i x} :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma Union_congr {f : ι → set α} {g : ι₂ → set α} (h : ι → ι₂)
(h1 : surjective h) (h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : (⋃ x, f x) = ⋃ y, g y :=
supr_congr h h1 h2
lemma Inter_congr {f : ι → set α} {g : ι₂ → set α} (h : ι → ι₂)
(h1 : surjective h) (h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : (⋂ x, f x) = ⋂ y, g y :=
infi_congr h h1 h2
theorem Union_const [nonempty ι] (s : set β) : (⋃ i : ι, s) = s := supr_const
theorem Inter_const [nonempty ι] (s : set β) : (⋂ i : ι, s) = s := infi_const
@[simp] theorem compl_Union (s : ι → set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ) :=
compl_supr
@[simp] theorem compl_Inter (s : ι → set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ) :=
compl_infi
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem Union_eq_compl_Inter_compl (s : ι → set β) : (⋃ i, s i) = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ :=
by simp only [compl_Inter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem Inter_eq_compl_Union_compl (s : ι → set β) : (⋂ i, s i) = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ :=
by simp only [compl_Union, compl_compl]
theorem inter_Union (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s ∩ (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_supr_eq _ _
theorem Union_inter (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
supr_inf_eq _ _
theorem Union_union_distrib (s : ι → set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋃ i, s i ∪ t i) = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ (⋃ i, t i) :=
supr_sup_eq
theorem Inter_inter_distrib (s : ι → set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋂ i, s i ∩ t i) = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ (⋂ i, t i) :=
infi_inf_eq
theorem union_Union [nonempty ι] (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s ∪ (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_supr
theorem Union_union [nonempty ι] (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
supr_sup
theorem inter_Inter [nonempty ι] (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s ∩ (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_infi
theorem Inter_inter [nonempty ι] (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
infi_inf
-- classical
theorem union_Inter (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s ∪ (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_infi_eq _ _
theorem Union_diff (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
Union_inter _ _
theorem diff_Union [nonempty ι] (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s \ (⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i :=
by rw [diff_eq, compl_Union, inter_Inter]; refl
theorem diff_Inter (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s \ (⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i :=
by rw [diff_eq, compl_Inter, inter_Union]; refl
lemma directed_on_Union {r} {f : ι → set α} (hd : directed (⊆) f)
(h : ∀ x, directed_on r (f x)) : directed_on r (⋃ x, f x) :=
by simp only [directed_on, exists_prop, mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib]; exact
λ a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂,
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂,
⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂) in
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
lemma Union_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → set α} : (⋃ i, s i ∩ t i) ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ (⋃ i, t i) :=
by { rintro x ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, xs, xt⟩, exact ⟨⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, xs⟩, _, ⟨i, rfl⟩, xt⟩ }
lemma Union_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [semilattice_sup ι] {s t : ι → set α}
(hs : monotone s) (ht : monotone t) : (⋃ i, s i ∩ t i) = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ (⋃ i, t i) :=
begin
ext x, refine ⟨λ hx, Union_inter_subset hx, _⟩,
rintro ⟨⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, xs⟩, _, ⟨j, rfl⟩, xt⟩,
exact ⟨_, ⟨i ⊔ j, rfl⟩, hs le_sup_left xs, ht le_sup_right xt⟩
end
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `Union_Inter_of_monotone` in `data.set.finite`. -/
lemma Union_Inter_subset {ι ι' α} {s : ι → ι' → set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
by { rintro x ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hx⟩ _ ⟨j, rfl⟩, exact ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hx _ ⟨j, rfl⟩⟩ }
lemma Union_option {ι} (s : option ι → set α) : (⋃ o, s o) = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
supr_option s
lemma Inter_option {ι} (s : option ι → set α) : (⋂ o, s o) = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
infi_option s
section
variables (p : ι → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
lemma Union_dite (f : Π i, p i → set α) (g : Π i, ¬p i → set α) :
(⋃ i, if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ i (h : p i), f i h) ∪ (⋃ i (h : ¬ p i), g i h) :=
supr_dite _ _ _
lemma Union_ite (f g : ι → set α) :
(⋃ i, if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ i (h : p i), f i) ∪ (⋃ i (h : ¬ p i), g i) :=
Union_dite _ _ _
lemma Inter_dite (f : Π i, p i → set α) (g : Π i, ¬p i → set α) :
(⋂ i, if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ i (h : p i), f i h) ∩ (⋂ i (h : ¬ p i), g i h) :=
infi_dite _ _ _
lemma Inter_ite (f g : ι → set α) :
(⋂ i, if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ i (h : p i), f i) ∩ (⋂ i (h : ¬ p i), g i) :=
Inter_dite _ _ _
end
lemma image_projection_prod {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {v : Π (i : ι), set (α i)}
(hv : (pi univ v).nonempty) (i : ι) :
(λ (x : Π (i : ι), α i), x i) '' (⋂ k, (λ (x : Π (j : ι), α j), x k) ⁻¹' v k) = v i:=
begin
classical,
apply subset.antisymm,
{ simp [Inter_subset] },
{ intros y y_in,
simp only [mem_image, mem_Inter, mem_preimage],
rcases hv with ⟨z, hz⟩,
refine ⟨function.update z i y, _, update_same i y z⟩,
rw @forall_update_iff ι α _ z i y (λ i t, t ∈ v i),
exact ⟨y_in, λ j hj, by simpa using hz j⟩ },
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
@[simp] theorem Inter_false {s : false → set α} : Inter s = univ := infi_false
@[simp] theorem Union_false {s : false → set α} : Union s = ∅ := supr_false
@[simp] theorem Inter_true {s : true → set α} : Inter s = s trivial := infi_true
@[simp] theorem Union_true {s : true → set α} : Union s = s trivial := supr_true
@[simp] theorem Inter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → set α} :
(⋂ x, f x) = (⋂ i (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
infi_exists
@[simp] theorem Union_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → set α} :
(⋃ x, f x) = (⋃ i (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
supr_exists
@[simp] lemma Union_empty : (⋃ i : ι, ∅ : set α) = ∅ := supr_bot
@[simp] lemma Inter_univ : (⋂ i : ι, univ : set α) = univ := infi_top
section
variables {s : ι → set α}
@[simp] lemma Union_eq_empty : (⋃ i, s i) = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ := supr_eq_bot
@[simp] lemma Inter_eq_univ : (⋂ i, s i) = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ := infi_eq_top
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Union : (⋃ i, s i).nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).nonempty :=
by simp [← ne_empty_iff_nonempty]
lemma Union_nonempty_index (s : set α) (t : s.nonempty → set β) :
(⋃ h, t h) = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
supr_exists
end
@[simp] theorem Inter_Inter_eq_left {b : β} {s : Π x : β, x = b → set α} :
(⋂ x (h : x = b), s x h) = s b rfl :=
infi_infi_eq_left
@[simp] theorem Inter_Inter_eq_right {b : β} {s : Π x : β, b = x → set α} :
(⋂ x (h : b = x), s x h) = s b rfl :=
infi_infi_eq_right
@[simp] theorem Union_Union_eq_left {b : β} {s : Π x : β, x = b → set α} :
(⋃ x (h : x = b), s x h) = s b rfl :=
supr_supr_eq_left
@[simp] theorem Union_Union_eq_right {b : β} {s : Π x : β, b = x → set α} :
(⋃ x (h : b = x), s x h) = s b rfl :=
supr_supr_eq_right
theorem Inter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → set α) :
(⋂ h, s h) = (⋂ h : p, s (or.inl h)) ∩ (⋂ h : q, s (or.inr h)) :=
infi_or
theorem Union_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → set α) :
(⋃ h, s h) = (⋃ i, s (or.inl i)) ∪ (⋃ j, s (or.inr j)) :=
supr_or
theorem Union_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → set α) :
(⋃ h, s h) = ⋃ hp hq, s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
supr_and
theorem Inter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → set α) :
(⋂ h, s h) = ⋂ hp hq, s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
infi_and
theorem Union_comm (s : ι → ι' → set α) :
(⋃ i i', s i i') = ⋃ i' i, s i i' :=
supr_comm
theorem Inter_comm (s : ι → ι' → set α) :
(⋂ i i', s i i') = ⋂ i' i, s i i' :=
infi_comm
@[simp] theorem bUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : Π x y, p x ∧ q x y → set α) :
(⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h) =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ :=
by simp only [Union_and, @Union_comm _ ι']
@[simp] theorem bUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : Π x y, p y ∧ q x y → set α) :
(⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h) =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ :=
by simp only [Union_and, @Union_comm _ ι]
@[simp] theorem bInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : Π x y, p x ∧ q x y → set α) :
(⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h) =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ :=
by simp only [Inter_and, @Inter_comm _ ι']
@[simp] theorem bInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : Π x y, p y ∧ q x y → set α) :
(⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h) =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ :=
by simp only [Inter_and, @Inter_comm _ ι]
@[simp] theorem Union_Union_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : Π x : β, (x = b ∨ p x) → set α} :
(⋃ x h, s x h) = s b (or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ x (h : p x), s x (or.inr h) :=
by simp only [Union_or, Union_union_distrib, Union_Union_eq_left]
@[simp] theorem Inter_Inter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : Π x : β, (x = b ∨ p x) → set α} :
(⋂ x h, s x h) = s b (or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ x (h : p x), s x (or.inr h) :=
by simp only [Inter_or, Inter_inter_distrib, Inter_Inter_eq_left]
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
theorem mem_bUnion_iff {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {y : β} :
y ∈ (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x := by simp
lemma mem_bUnion_iff' {p : α → Prop} {t : α → set β} {y : β} :
y ∈ (⋃ i (h : p i), t i) ↔ ∃ i (h : p i), y ∈ t i :=
mem_bUnion_iff
theorem mem_bInter_iff {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {y : β} :
y ∈ (⋂ x ∈ s, t x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x := by simp
theorem mem_bUnion {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_bUnion_iff.2 ⟨x, ⟨xs, ytx⟩⟩
theorem mem_bInter {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_bInter_iff.2 h
theorem bUnion_subset {s : set α} {t : set β} {u : α → set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, u x ⊆ t) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ⊆ t :=
Union_subset $ λ x, Union_subset (h x)
theorem subset_bInter {s : set α} {t : set β} {u : α → set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t ⊆ u x) :
t ⊆ (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) :=
subset_Inter $ λ x, subset_Inter $ h x
theorem subset_bUnion_of_mem {s : set α} {u : α → set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) :=
show u x ≤ (⨆ x ∈ s, u x),
from le_supr_of_le x $ le_supr _ xs
theorem bInter_subset_of_mem {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
(⋂ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ t x :=
show (⨅ x ∈ s, t x) ≤ t x,
from infi_le_of_le x $ infi_le _ xs
theorem bUnion_subset_bUnion_left {s s' : set α} {t : α → set β}
(h : s ⊆ s') : (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋃ x ∈ s', t x) :=
bUnion_subset (λ x xs, subset_bUnion_of_mem (h xs))
theorem bInter_subset_bInter_left {s s' : set α} {t : α → set β}
(h : s' ⊆ s) : (⋂ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋂ x ∈ s', t x) :=
subset_bInter (λ x xs, bInter_subset_of_mem (h xs))
theorem bUnion_subset_bUnion {γ : Type*} {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {s' : set γ} {t' : γ → set β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s', t x ⊆ t' y) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋃ y ∈ s', t' y) :=
begin
simp only [Union_subset_iff],
rintros a a_in x ha,
rcases h a a_in with ⟨c, c_in, hc⟩,
exact mem_bUnion c_in (hc ha)
end
theorem bInter_mono' {s s' : set α} {t t' : α → set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
(⋂ x ∈ s', t x) ⊆ (⋂ x ∈ s, t' x) :=
(bInter_subset_bInter_left hs).trans $
subset_bInter (λ x xs, subset.trans (bInter_subset_of_mem xs) (h x xs))
theorem bInter_mono {s : set α} {t t' : α → set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
(⋂ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋂ x ∈ s, t' x) :=
bInter_mono' (subset.refl s) h
lemma bInter_congr {s : set α} {t1 t2 : α → set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t1 x = t2 x) :
(⋂ (x ∈ s), t1 x) = (⋂ (x ∈ s), t2 x) :=
subset.antisymm (bInter_mono (λ x hx, by rw h x hx)) (bInter_mono (λ x hx, by rw h x hx))
theorem bUnion_mono {s : set α} {t t' : α → set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋃ x ∈ s, t' x) :=
bUnion_subset_bUnion (λ x x_in, ⟨x, x_in, h x x_in⟩)
lemma bUnion_congr {s : set α} {t1 t2 : α → set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t1 x = t2 x) :
(⋃ (x ∈ s), t1 x) = (⋃ (x ∈ s), t2 x) :=
subset.antisymm (bUnion_mono (λ x hx, by rw h x hx)) (bUnion_mono (λ x hx, by rw h x hx))
theorem bUnion_eq_Union (s : set α) (t : Π x ∈ s, set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_›) = (⋃ x : s, t x x.2) :=
supr_subtype'
theorem bInter_eq_Inter (s : set α) (t : Π x ∈ s, set β) :
(⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_›) = (⋂ x : s, t x x.2) :=
infi_subtype'
theorem Union_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : {x // p x} → set β) :
(⋃ x : {x // p x}, s x) = ⋃ x (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
supr_subtype
theorem Inter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : {x // p x} → set β) :
(⋂ x : {x // p x}, s x) = ⋂ x (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
infi_subtype
theorem bInter_empty (u : α → set β) : (⋂ x ∈ (∅ : set α), u x) = univ :=
infi_emptyset
theorem bInter_univ (u : α → set β) : (⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x) = ⋂ x, u x :=
infi_univ
@[simp] lemma bUnion_self (s : set α) : (⋃ x ∈ s, s) = s :=
subset.antisymm (bUnion_subset $ λ x hx, subset.refl s) (λ x hx, mem_bUnion hx hx)
@[simp] lemma Union_nonempty_self (s : set α) : (⋃ h : s.nonempty, s) = s :=
by rw [Union_nonempty_index, bUnion_self]
-- TODO(Jeremy): here is an artifact of the encoding of bounded intersection:
-- without dsimp, the next theorem fails to type check, because there is a lambda
-- in a type that needs to be contracted. Using simp [eq_of_mem_singleton xa] also works.
theorem bInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → set β) : (⋂ x ∈ ({a} : set α), s x) = s a :=
infi_singleton
theorem bInter_union (s t : set α) (u : α → set β) :
(⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x) = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ (⋂ x ∈ t, u x) :=
infi_union
theorem bInter_insert (a : α) (s : set α) (t : α → set β) :
(⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x) = t a ∩ (⋂ x ∈ s, t x) :=
by simp
-- TODO(Jeremy): another example of where an annotation is needed
theorem bInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → set β) :
(⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : set α), s x) = s a ∩ s b :=
by rw [bInter_insert, bInter_singleton]
lemma bInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : set ι} (hs : s.nonempty) (f : ι → set α) (t : set α) :
(⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t) = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t :=
begin
haveI : nonempty s := hs.to_subtype,
simp [bInter_eq_Inter, ← Inter_inter]
end
lemma inter_bInter {ι α : Type*} {s : set ι} (hs : s.nonempty) (f : ι → set α) (t : set α) :
(⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i) = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i :=
begin
rw [inter_comm, ← bInter_inter hs],
simp [inter_comm]
end
theorem bUnion_empty (s : α → set β) : (⋃ x ∈ (∅ : set α), s x) = ∅ :=
supr_emptyset
theorem bUnion_univ (s : α → set β) : (⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x) = ⋃ x, s x :=
supr_univ
theorem bUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → set β) : (⋃ x ∈ ({a} : set α), s x) = s a :=
supr_singleton
@[simp] theorem bUnion_of_singleton (s : set α) : (⋃ x ∈ s, {x}) = s :=
ext $ by simp
theorem bUnion_union (s t : set α) (u : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x) = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ (⋃ x ∈ t, u x) :=
supr_union
@[simp] lemma Union_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : set α) (f : α → set β) :
(⋃ (i : s), f i) = ⋃ (i ∈ s), f i :=
Union_subtype _ _
@[simp] lemma Inter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : set α) (f : α → set β) :
(⋂ (i : s), f i) = ⋂ (i ∈ s), f i :=
Inter_subtype _ _
-- TODO(Jeremy): once again, simp doesn't do it alone.
theorem bUnion_insert (a : α) (s : set α) (t : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x) = t a ∪ (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
by simp
theorem bUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : set α), s x) = s a ∪ s b :=
by simp
theorem compl_bUnion (s : set α) (t : α → set β) : (⋃ i ∈ s, t i)ᶜ = (⋂ i ∈ s, (t i)ᶜ) :=
by simp
theorem compl_bInter (s : set α) (t : α → set β) : (⋂ i ∈ s, t i)ᶜ = (⋃ i ∈ s, (t i)ᶜ) :=
by simp
theorem inter_bUnion (s : set α) (t : α → set β) (u : set β) :
u ∩ (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, u ∩ t i :=
by simp only [inter_Union]
theorem bUnion_inter (s : set α) (t : α → set β) (u : set β) :
(⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ∩ u = (⋃ i ∈ s, t i ∩ u) :=
by simp only [@inter_comm _ _ u, inter_bUnion]
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : set α} {S : set (set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : set α} {S : set (set α)}
(hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S) (ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t :=
λ h, hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
Inf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_Sup tS
lemma subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : set α} (t : set (set α)) (u : set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : (⋃₀ S) ⊆ t :=
Sup_le h
@[simp] theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : set (set α)} {t : set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
@Sup_le_iff (set α) _ _ _
theorem subset_sInter {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ (⋂₀ S) :=
le_Inf h
@[simp] theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} : t ⊆ (⋂₀ S) ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
@le_Inf_iff (set α) _ _ _
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : set (set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset $ λ s hs, subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : set (set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter $ λ s hs, sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp] theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : set α) := Sup_empty
@[simp] theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : set α) := Inf_empty
@[simp] theorem sUnion_singleton (s : set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s := Sup_singleton
@[simp] theorem sInter_singleton (s : set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s := Inf_singleton
@[simp] theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : set (set α)} : (⋃₀ S) = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ := Sup_eq_bot
@[simp] theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : set (set α)} : (⋂₀ S) = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ := Inf_eq_top
@[simp] theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : set (set α)} : (⋃₀ S).nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, set.nonempty s :=
by simp [← ne_empty_iff_nonempty]
lemma nonempty.of_sUnion {s : set (set α)} (h : (⋃₀ s).nonempty) : s.nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h in ⟨s, hs⟩
lemma nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [nonempty α] {s : set (set α)} (h : ⋃₀ s = univ) : s.nonempty :=
nonempty.of_sUnion $ h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
theorem sUnion_union (S T : set (set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T := Sup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : set (set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T := Inf_union
theorem sInter_Union (s : ι → set (set α)) : ⋂₀ (⋃ i, s i) = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_Union, mem_Inter, mem_sInter, exists_imp_distrib],
split; tauto
end
@[simp] theorem sUnion_insert (s : set α) (T : set (set α)) : ⋃₀ (insert s T) = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
Sup_insert
@[simp] theorem sInter_insert (s : set α) (T : set (set α)) : ⋂₀ (insert s T) = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
Inf_insert
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
Sup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
Inf_pair
@[simp] theorem sUnion_image (f : α → set β) (s : set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x := Sup_image
@[simp] theorem sInter_image (f : α → set β) (s : set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ x ∈ s, f x := Inf_image
@[simp] theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → set β) : ⋃₀ (range f) = ⋃ x, f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem sInter_range (f : ι → set β) : ⋂₀ (range f) = ⋂ x, f x := rfl
lemma Union_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → set α} : (⋃ i, f i) = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i :=
by simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_Union]
lemma bUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : α → set β} {s : set α} :
(⋃ x ∈ s, f x) = univ ↔ ∀ y, ∃ x ∈ s, y ∈ f x :=
by simp only [Union_eq_univ_iff, mem_Union]
lemma sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : set (set α)} :
⋃₀ c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b :=
by simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
-- classical
lemma Inter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → set α} : (⋂ i, f i) = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i :=
by simp [set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
lemma bInter_eq_empty_iff {f : α → set β} {s : set α} :
(⋂ x ∈ s, f x) = ∅ ↔ ∀ y, ∃ x ∈ s, y ∉ f x :=
by simp [set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
lemma sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : set (set α)} :
⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b :=
by simp [set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
@[simp] theorem nonempty_Inter {f : ι → set α} : (⋂ i, f i).nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i :=
by simp [← ne_empty_iff_nonempty, Inter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
@[simp] theorem nonempty_bInter {f : α → set β} {s : set α} :
(⋂ x ∈ s, f x).nonempty ↔ ∃ y, ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ f x :=
by simp [← ne_empty_iff_nonempty, Inter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
@[simp] theorem nonempty_sInter {c : set (set α)}:
(⋂₀ c).nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b :=
by simp [← ne_empty_iff_nonempty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : set (set α)) :
(⋃₀ S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : set (set α)) :
⋃₀ S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ :=
by rw [←compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : set (set α)) :
(⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) :=
by rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : set (set α)) :
⋂₀ S = (⋃₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ :=
by rw [←compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : set α} {S : set (set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) :
s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ by rw ← h; exact
inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
theorem range_sigma_eq_Union_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range (λ b, f ⟨a, b⟩) :=
set.ext $ by simp
theorem Union_eq_range_sigma (s : α → set β) : (⋃ i, s i) = range (λ a : Σ i, s i, a.2) :=
by simp [set.ext_iff]
theorem Union_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : set (sigma σ)) :
(⋃ i, sigma.mk i '' (sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s)) = s :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_Union, mem_image, mem_preimage],
split,
{ rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩, exact h },
{ intro h, cases x with i a, exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma sUnion_mono {s t : set (set α)} (h : s ⊆ t) : (⋃₀ s) ⊆ (⋃₀ t) :=
sUnion_subset $ λ t' ht', subset_sUnion_of_mem $ h ht'
lemma Union_subset_Union {s t : ι → set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : (⋃ i, s i) ⊆ (⋃ i, t i) :=
@supr_le_supr (set α) ι _ s t h
lemma Union_subset_Union2 {s : ι → set α} {t : ι₂ → set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
(⋃ i, s i) ⊆ (⋃ i, t i) :=
@supr_le_supr2 (set α) ι ι₂ _ s t h
lemma Union_subset_Union_const {s : set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : (⋃ i : ι, s) ⊆ (⋃ j : ι₂, s) :=
@supr_le_supr_const (set α) ι ι₂ _ s h
@[simp] lemma Union_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : set α) = univ :=
Union_eq_univ_iff.2 $ λ x, ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma Union_of_singleton_coe (s : set α) :
(⋃ (i : s), {i} : set α) = s :=
by simp
theorem bUnion_subset_Union (s : set α) (t : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋃ x, t x) :=
Union_subset_Union $ λ i, Union_subset $ λ h, by refl
lemma sUnion_eq_bUnion {s : set (set α)} : (⋃₀ s) = (⋃ (i : set α) (h : i ∈ s), i) :=
by rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
lemma sInter_eq_bInter {s : set (set α)} : (⋂₀ s) = (⋂ (i : set α) (h : i ∈ s), i) :=
by rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
lemma sUnion_eq_Union {s : set (set α)} : (⋃₀ s) = (⋃ (i : s), i) :=
by simp only [←sUnion_range, subtype.range_coe]
lemma sInter_eq_Inter {s : set (set α)} : (⋂₀ s) = (⋂ (i : s), i) :=
by simp only [←sInter_range, subtype.range_coe]
lemma union_eq_Union {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_supr s₁ s₂
lemma inter_eq_Inter {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_infi s₁ s₂
lemma sInter_union_sInter {S T : set (set α)} :
(⋂₀ S) ∪ (⋂₀ T) = (⋂ p ∈ S.prod T, (p : (set α) × (set α)).1 ∪ p.2) :=
Inf_sup_Inf
lemma sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : set (set α)} :
(⋃₀ s) ∩ (⋃₀ t) = (⋃ p ∈ s.prod t, (p : (set α) × (set α )).1 ∩ p.2) :=
Sup_inf_Sup
lemma bUnion_Union (s : ι → set α) (t : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x) = ⋃ i (x ∈ s i), t x :=
by simp [@Union_comm _ ι]
/-- If `S` is a set of sets, and each `s ∈ S` can be represented as an intersection
of sets `T s hs`, then `⋂₀ S` is the intersection of the union of all `T s hs`. -/
lemma sInter_bUnion {S : set (set α)} {T : Π s ∈ S, set (set α)}
(hT : ∀ s ∈ S, s = ⋂₀ T s ‹s ∈ S›) :
⋂₀ (⋃ s ∈ S, T s ‹_›) = ⋂₀ S :=
begin
ext,
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, set.mem_sInter, set.mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib],
split,
{ rintro H s sS,
rw [hT s sS, mem_sInter],
exact λ t, H t s sS },
{ rintro H t s sS tTs,
suffices : s ⊆ t, exact this (H s sS),
rw [hT s sS, sInter_eq_bInter],
exact bInter_subset_of_mem tTs }
end
/-- If `S` is a set of sets, and each `s ∈ S` can be represented as an union
of sets `T s hs`, then `⋃₀ S` is the union of the union of all `T s hs`. -/
lemma sUnion_bUnion {S : set (set α)} {T : Π s ∈ S, set (set α)} (hT : ∀ s ∈ S, s = ⋃₀ T s ‹_›) :
⋃₀ (⋃ s ∈ S, T s ‹_›) = ⋃₀ S :=
begin
ext,
simp only [exists_prop, set.mem_Union, set.mem_set_of_eq],
split,
{ rintro ⟨t, ⟨s, sS, tTs⟩, xt⟩,
refine ⟨s, sS, _⟩,
rw hT s sS,
exact subset_sUnion_of_mem tTs xt },
{ rintro ⟨s, sS, xs⟩,
rw hT s sS at xs,
rcases mem_sUnion.1 xs with ⟨t, tTs, xt⟩,
exact ⟨t, ⟨s, sS, tTs⟩, xt⟩ }
end
lemma Union_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : set (set α))
{f : ∀ (s : C), β → s} (hf : ∀ (s : C), surjective (f s)) :
(⋃ (y : β), range (λ (s : C), (f s y).val)) = ⋃₀ C :=
begin
ext x, split,
{ rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩, refine ⟨_, hs, _⟩, exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2 },
{ rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩, cases hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy, refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, _⟩,
exact congr_arg subtype.val hy }
end
lemma Union_range_eq_Union {ι α β : Type*} (C : ι → set α)
{f : ∀ (x : ι), β → C x} (hf : ∀ (x : ι), surjective (f x)) :
(⋃ (y : β), range (λ (x : ι), (f x y).val)) = ⋃ x, C x :=
begin
ext x, rw [mem_Union, mem_Union], split,
{ rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩, exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨i, hx⟩, cases hf i ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy,
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg subtype.val hy⟩ }
end
lemma union_distrib_Inter_right {ι : Type*} (s : ι → set α) (t : set α) :
(⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = (⋂ i, s i ∪ t) :=
infi_sup_eq _ _
lemma union_distrib_Inter_left {ι : Type*} (s : ι → set α) (t : set α) :
t ∪ (⋂ i, s i) = (⋂ i, t ∪ s i) :=
sup_infi_eq _ _
lemma union_distrib_bInter_left {ι : Type*} (s : ι → set α) (u : set ι) (t : set α) :
t ∪ (⋂ i ∈ u, s i) = ⋂ i ∈ u, t ∪ s i :=
by rw [bInter_eq_Inter, bInter_eq_Inter, union_distrib_Inter_left]
lemma union_distrib_bInter_right {ι : Type*} (s : ι → set α) (u : set ι) (t : set α) :
(⋂ i ∈ u, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i ∈ u, s i ∪ t :=
by rw [bInter_eq_Inter, bInter_eq_Inter, union_distrib_Inter_right]
section function
/-! ### `maps_to` -/
lemma maps_to_sUnion {S : set (set α)} {t : set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ s ∈ S, maps_to f s t) :
maps_to f (⋃₀ S) t :=
λ x ⟨s, hs, hx⟩, H s hs hx
lemma maps_to_Union {s : ι → set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, maps_to f (s i) t) :
maps_to f (⋃ i, s i) t :=
maps_to_sUnion $ forall_range_iff.2 H
lemma maps_to_bUnion {p : ι → Prop} {s : Π (i : ι) (hi : p i), set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i hi, maps_to f (s i hi) t) :
maps_to f (⋃ i hi, s i hi) t :=
maps_to_Union $ λ i, maps_to_Union (H i)
lemma maps_to_Union_Union {s : ι → set α} {t : ι → set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, maps_to f (s i) (t i)) :
maps_to f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
maps_to_Union $ λ i, (H i).mono (subset.refl _) (subset_Union t i)
lemma maps_to_bUnion_bUnion {p : ι → Prop} {s : Π i (hi : p i), set α} {t : Π i (hi : p i), set β}
{f : α → β} (H : ∀ i hi, maps_to f (s i hi) (t i hi)) :
maps_to f (⋃ i hi, s i hi) (⋃ i hi, t i hi) :=
maps_to_Union_Union $ λ i, maps_to_Union_Union (H i)
lemma maps_to_sInter {s : set α} {T : set (set β)} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ t ∈ T, maps_to f s t) :
maps_to f s (⋂₀ T) :=
λ x hx t ht, H t ht hx
lemma maps_to_Inter {s : set α} {t : ι → set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, maps_to f s (t i)) :
maps_to f s (⋂ i, t i) :=
λ x hx, mem_Inter.2 $ λ i, H i hx
lemma maps_to_bInter {p : ι → Prop} {s : set α} {t : Π i (hi : p i), set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i hi, maps_to f s (t i hi)) :
maps_to f s (⋂ i hi, t i hi) :=
maps_to_Inter $ λ i, maps_to_Inter (H i)
lemma maps_to_Inter_Inter {s : ι → set α} {t : ι → set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, maps_to f (s i) (t i)) :
maps_to f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
maps_to_Inter $ λ i, (H i).mono (Inter_subset s i) (subset.refl _)
lemma maps_to_bInter_bInter {p : ι → Prop} {s : Π i (hi : p i), set α}
{t : Π i (hi : p i), set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i hi, maps_to f (s i hi) (t i hi)) :
maps_to f (⋂ i hi, s i hi) (⋂ i hi, t i hi) :=
maps_to_Inter_Inter $ λ i, maps_to_Inter_Inter (H i)
lemma image_Inter_subset (s : ι → set α) (f : α → β) :
f '' (⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, f '' (s i) :=
(maps_to_Inter_Inter $ λ i, maps_to_image f (s i)).image_subset
lemma image_bInter_subset {p : ι → Prop} (s : Π i (hi : p i), set α) (f : α → β) :
f '' (⋂ i hi, s i hi) ⊆ ⋂ i hi, f '' (s i hi) :=
(maps_to_bInter_bInter $ λ i hi, maps_to_image f (s i hi)).image_subset
lemma image_sInter_subset (S : set (set α)) (f : α → β) :
f '' (⋂₀ S) ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, f '' s :=
by { rw sInter_eq_bInter, apply image_bInter_subset }
/-! ### `inj_on` -/
lemma inj_on.image_Inter_eq [nonempty ι] {s : ι → set α} {f : α → β} (h : inj_on f (⋃ i, s i)) :
f '' (⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f '' (s i) :=
begin
inhabit ι,
refine subset.antisymm (image_Inter_subset s f) (λ y hy, _),
simp only [mem_Inter, mem_image_iff_bex] at hy,
choose x hx hy using hy,
refine ⟨x (default ι), mem_Inter.2 $ λ i, _, hy _⟩,
suffices : x (default ι) = x i,
{ rw this, apply hx },
replace hx : ∀ i, x i ∈ ⋃ j, s j := λ i, (subset_Union _ _) (hx i),
apply h (hx _) (hx _),
simp only [hy]
end
lemma inj_on.image_bInter_eq {p : ι → Prop} {s : Π i (hi : p i), set α} (hp : ∃ i, p i) {f : α → β}
(h : inj_on f (⋃ i hi, s i hi)) :
f '' (⋂ i hi, s i hi) = ⋂ i hi, f '' (s i hi) :=
begin
simp only [Inter, infi_subtype'],
haveI : nonempty {i // p i} := nonempty_subtype.2 hp,
apply inj_on.image_Inter_eq,
simpa only [Union, supr_subtype'] using h
end
lemma inj_on_Union_of_directed {s : ι → set α} (hs : directed (⊆) s)
{f : α → β} (hf : ∀ i, inj_on f (s i)) :
inj_on f (⋃ i, s i) :=
begin
intros x hx y hy hxy,
rcases mem_Union.1 hx with ⟨i, hx⟩,
rcases mem_Union.1 hy with ⟨j, hy⟩,
rcases hs i j with ⟨k, hi, hj⟩,
exact hf k (hi hx) (hj hy) hxy
end
/-! ### `surj_on` -/
lemma surj_on_sUnion {s : set α} {T : set (set β)} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ t ∈ T, surj_on f s t) :
surj_on f s (⋃₀ T) :=
λ x ⟨t, ht, hx⟩, H t ht hx
lemma surj_on_Union {s : set α} {t : ι → set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, surj_on f s (t i)) :
surj_on f s (⋃ i, t i) :=
surj_on_sUnion $ forall_range_iff.2 H
lemma surj_on_Union_Union {s : ι → set α} {t : ι → set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, surj_on f (s i) (t i)) :
surj_on f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
surj_on_Union $ λ i, (H i).mono (subset_Union _ _) (subset.refl _)
lemma surj_on_bUnion {p : ι → Prop} {s : set α} {t : Π i (hi : p i), set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i hi, surj_on f s (t i hi)) :
surj_on f s (⋃ i hi, t i hi) :=
surj_on_Union $ λ i, surj_on_Union (H i)
lemma surj_on_bUnion_bUnion {p : ι → Prop} {s : Π i (hi : p i), set α} {t : Π i (hi : p i), set β}
{f : α → β} (H : ∀ i hi, surj_on f (s i hi) (t i hi)) :
surj_on f (⋃ i hi, s i hi) (⋃ i hi, t i hi) :=
surj_on_Union_Union $ λ i, surj_on_Union_Union (H i)
lemma surj_on_Inter [hi : nonempty ι] {s : ι → set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, surj_on f (s i) t) (Hinj : inj_on f (⋃ i, s i)) :
surj_on f (⋂ i, s i) t :=
begin
intros y hy,
rw [Hinj.image_Inter_eq, mem_Inter],
exact λ i, H i hy
end
lemma surj_on_Inter_Inter [hi : nonempty ι] {s : ι → set α} {t : ι → set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, surj_on f (s i) (t i)) (Hinj : inj_on f (⋃ i, s i)) :
surj_on f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
surj_on_Inter (λ i, (H i).mono (subset.refl _) (Inter_subset _ _)) Hinj
/-! ### `bij_on` -/
lemma bij_on_Union {s : ι → set α} {t : ι → set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, bij_on f (s i) (t i))
(Hinj : inj_on f (⋃ i, s i)) :
bij_on f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
⟨maps_to_Union_Union $ λ i, (H i).maps_to, Hinj, surj_on_Union_Union $ λ i, (H i).surj_on⟩
lemma bij_on_Inter [hi :nonempty ι] {s : ι → set α} {t : ι → set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, bij_on f (s i) (t i)) (Hinj : inj_on f (⋃ i, s i)) :
bij_on f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
⟨maps_to_Inter_Inter $ λ i, (H i).maps_to, hi.elim $ λ i, (H i).inj_on.mono (Inter_subset _ _),
surj_on_Inter_Inter (λ i, (H i).surj_on) Hinj⟩
lemma bij_on_Union_of_directed {s : ι → set α} (hs : directed (⊆) s) {t : ι → set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, bij_on f (s i) (t i)) :
bij_on f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
bij_on_Union H $ inj_on_Union_of_directed hs (λ i, (H i).inj_on)
lemma bij_on_Inter_of_directed [nonempty ι] {s : ι → set α} (hs : directed (⊆) s) {t : ι → set β}
{f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, bij_on f (s i) (t i)) :
bij_on f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
bij_on_Inter H $ inj_on_Union_of_directed hs (λ i, (H i).inj_on)
end function
/-! ### `image`, `preimage` -/
section image
lemma image_Union {f : α → β} {s : ι → set α} : f '' (⋃ i, s i) = (⋃ i, f '' s i) :=
begin
ext1 x,
simp [image, ← exists_and_distrib_right, @exists_swap α]
end
lemma image_bUnion {f : α → β} {s : ι → set α} {p : ι → Prop} :
f '' (⋃ i (hi : p i), s i) = (⋃ i (hi : p i), f '' s i) :=
by simp only [image_Union]
lemma univ_subtype {p : α → Prop} : (univ : set (subtype p)) = (⋃ x (h : p x), {⟨x, h⟩}) :=
set.ext $ λ ⟨x, h⟩, by simp [h]
lemma range_eq_Union {ι} (f : ι → α) : range f = (⋃ i, {f i}) :=
set.ext $ λ a, by simp [@eq_comm α a]
lemma image_eq_Union (f : α → β) (s : set α) : f '' s = (⋃ i ∈ s, {f i}) :=
set.ext $ λ b, by simp [@eq_comm β b]
lemma bUnion_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → set β} : (⋃ x ∈ range f, g x) = (⋃ y, g (f y)) :=
supr_range
@[simp] lemma Union_Union_eq' {f : ι → α} {g : α → set β} :
(⋃ x y (h : f y = x), g x) = ⋃ y, g (f y) :=
by simpa using bUnion_range
lemma bInter_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → set β} : (⋂ x ∈ range f, g x) = (⋂ y, g (f y)) :=
infi_range
@[simp] lemma Inter_Inter_eq' {f : ι → α} {g : α → set β} :
(⋂ x y (h : f y = x), g x) = ⋂ y, g (f y) :=
by simpa using bInter_range
variables {s : set γ} {f : γ → α} {g : α → set β}
lemma bUnion_image : (⋃ x ∈ f '' s, g x) = (⋃ y ∈ s, g (f y)) :=
supr_image
lemma bInter_image : (⋂ x ∈ f '' s, g x) = (⋂ y ∈ s, g (f y)) :=
infi_image
end image
section preimage
theorem monotone_preimage {f : α → β} : monotone (preimage f) := λ a b h, preimage_mono h
@[simp] theorem preimage_Union {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β} {s : ι → set β} :
f ⁻¹' (⋃ i, s i) = (⋃ i, f ⁻¹' s i) :=
set.ext $ by simp [preimage]
theorem preimage_bUnion {ι} {f : α → β} {s : set ι} {t : ι → set β} :
f ⁻¹' (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = (⋃ i ∈ s, f ⁻¹' (t i)) :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_sUnion {f : α → β} {s : set (set β)} :
f ⁻¹' (⋃₀ s) = (⋃ t ∈ s, f ⁻¹' t) :=
set.ext $ by simp [preimage]
lemma preimage_Inter {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' (⋂ i, s i) = (⋂ i, f ⁻¹' s i) :=
by ext; simp
lemma preimage_bInter {s : γ → set β} {t : set γ} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' (⋂ i ∈ t, s i) = (⋂ i ∈ t, f ⁻¹' s i) :=
by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma bUnion_preimage_singleton (f : α → β) (s : set β) : (⋃ y ∈ s, f ⁻¹' {y}) = f ⁻¹' s :=
by rw [← preimage_bUnion, bUnion_of_singleton]
lemma bUnion_range_preimage_singleton (f : α → β) : (⋃ y ∈ range f, f ⁻¹' {y}) = univ :=
by rw [bUnion_preimage_singleton, preimage_range]
end preimage
section prod
theorem monotone_prod [preorder α] {f : α → set β} {g : α → set γ}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λ x, (f x).prod (g x)) :=
λ a b h, prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
alias monotone_prod ← monotone.set_prod
lemma prod_Union {ι} {s : set α} {t : ι → set β} : s.prod (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s.prod (t i) :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma prod_bUnion {ι} {u : set ι} {s : set α} {t : ι → set β} :
s.prod (⋃ i ∈ u, t i) = ⋃ i ∈ u, s.prod (t i) :=
by simp_rw [prod_Union]
lemma prod_sUnion {s : set α} {C : set (set β)} : s.prod (⋃₀ C) = ⋃₀ ((λ t, s.prod t) '' C) :=
by { simp only [sUnion_eq_bUnion, prod_bUnion, bUnion_image] }
lemma Union_prod_const {ι} {s : ι → set α} {t : set β} : (⋃ i, s i).prod t = ⋃ i, (s i).prod t :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma bUnion_prod_const {ι} {u : set ι} {s : ι → set α} {t : set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ u, s i).prod t = ⋃ i ∈ u, (s i).prod t :=
by simp_rw [Union_prod_const]
lemma sUnion_prod_const {C : set (set α)} {t : set β} :
(⋃₀ C).prod t = ⋃₀ ((λ s : set α, s.prod t) '' C) :=
by { simp only [sUnion_eq_bUnion, bUnion_prod_const, bUnion_image] }
lemma Union_prod {ι α β} (s : ι → set α) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋃ (x : ι × ι), (s x.1).prod (t x.2)) = (⋃ (i : ι), s i).prod (⋃ (i : ι), t i) :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma Union_prod_of_monotone [semilattice_sup α] {s : α → set β} {t : α → set γ}
(hs : monotone s) (ht : monotone t) : (⋃ x, (s x).prod (t x)) = (⋃ x, (s x)).prod (⋃ x, (t x)) :=
begin
ext ⟨z, w⟩, simp only [mem_prod, mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp, iff_def], split,
{ intros x hz hw, exact ⟨⟨x, hz⟩, x, hw⟩ },
{ intros x hz x' hw, exact ⟨x ⊔ x', hs le_sup_left hz, ht le_sup_right hw⟩ }
end
end prod
section image2
variables (f : α → β → γ) {s : set α} {t : set β}
lemma Union_image_left : (⋃ a ∈ s, f a '' t) = image2 f s t :=
by { ext y, split; simp only [mem_Union]; rintro ⟨a, ha, x, hx, ax⟩; exact ⟨a, x, ha, hx, ax⟩ }
lemma Union_image_right : (⋃ b ∈ t, (λ a, f a b) '' s) = image2 f s t :=
by { ext y, split; simp only [mem_Union]; rintro ⟨a, b, c, d, e⟩, exact ⟨c, a, d, b, e⟩,
exact ⟨b, d, a, c, e⟩ }
lemma image2_Union_left (s : ι → set α) (t : set β) :
image2 f (⋃ i, s i) t = ⋃ i, image2 f (s i) t :=
by simp only [← image_prod, Union_prod_const, image_Union]
lemma image2_Union_right (s : set α) (t : ι → set β) :
image2 f s (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, image2 f s (t i) :=
by simp only [← image_prod, prod_Union, image_Union]
end image2
section seq
/-- Given a set `s` of functions `α → β` and `t : set α`, `seq s t` is the union of `f '' t` over
all `f ∈ s`. -/
def seq (s : set (α → β)) (t : set α) : set β := {b | ∃ f ∈ s, ∃ a ∈ t, (f : α → β) a = b}
lemma seq_def {s : set (α → β)} {t : set α} : seq s t = ⋃ f ∈ s, f '' t :=
set.ext $ by simp [seq]
@[simp] lemma mem_seq_iff {s : set (α → β)} {t : set α} {b : β} :
b ∈ seq s t ↔ ∃ (f ∈ s) (a ∈ t), (f : α → β) a = b :=
iff.rfl
lemma seq_subset {s : set (α → β)} {t : set α} {u : set β} :
seq s t ⊆ u ↔ (∀ f ∈ s, ∀ a ∈ t, (f : α → β) a ∈ u) :=
iff.intro
(λ h f hf a ha, h ⟨f, hf, a, ha, rfl⟩)
(λ h b ⟨f, hf, a, ha, eq⟩, eq ▸ h f hf a ha)
lemma seq_mono {s₀ s₁ : set (α → β)} {t₀ t₁ : set α} (hs : s₀ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₀ ⊆ t₁) :
seq s₀ t₀ ⊆ seq s₁ t₁ :=
λ b ⟨f, hf, a, ha, eq⟩, ⟨f, hs hf, a, ht ha, eq⟩
lemma singleton_seq {f : α → β} {t : set α} : set.seq {f} t = f '' t :=
set.ext $ by simp
lemma seq_singleton {s : set (α → β)} {a : α} : set.seq s {a} = (λ f : α → β, f a) '' s :=
set.ext $ by simp
lemma seq_seq {s : set (β → γ)} {t : set (α → β)} {u : set α} :
seq s (seq t u) = seq (seq ((∘) '' s) t) u :=
begin
refine set.ext (λ c, iff.intro _ _),
{ rintro ⟨f, hfs, b, ⟨g, hg, a, hau, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨f ∘ g, ⟨(∘) f, mem_image_of_mem _ hfs, g, hg, rfl⟩, a, hau, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨fg, ⟨fc, ⟨f, hfs, rfl⟩, g, hgt, rfl⟩, a, ha, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨f, hfs, g a, ⟨g, hgt, a, ha, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma image_seq {f : β → γ} {s : set (α → β)} {t : set α} :
f '' seq s t = seq ((∘) f '' s) t :=
by rw [← singleton_seq, ← singleton_seq, seq_seq, image_singleton]
lemma prod_eq_seq {s : set α} {t : set β} : s.prod t = (prod.mk '' s).seq t :=
begin
ext ⟨a, b⟩,
split,
{ rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩, exact ⟨prod.mk a, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩, b, hb, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨f, ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, y, hy, eq⟩, rw ← eq, exact ⟨hx, hy⟩ }
end
lemma prod_image_seq_comm (s : set α) (t : set β) :
(prod.mk '' s).seq t = seq ((λ b a, (a, b)) '' t) s :=
by rw [← prod_eq_seq, ← image_swap_prod, prod_eq_seq, image_seq, ← image_comp, prod.swap]
lemma image2_eq_seq (f : α → β → γ) (s : set α) (t : set β) : image2 f s t = seq (f '' s) t :=
by { ext, simp }
end seq
/-! ### `set` as a monad -/
instance : monad set :=
{ pure := λ (α : Type u) a, {a},
bind := λ (α β : Type u) s f, ⋃ i ∈ s, f i,
seq := λ (α β : Type u), set.seq,
map := λ (α β : Type u), set.image }
section monad
variables {α' β' : Type u} {s : set α'} {f : α' → set β'} {g : set (α' → β')}
@[simp] lemma bind_def : s >>= f = ⋃ i ∈ s, f i := rfl
@[simp] lemma fmap_eq_image (f : α' → β') : f <$> s = f '' s := rfl
@[simp] lemma seq_eq_set_seq {α β : Type*} (s : set (α → β)) (t : set α) : s <*> t = s.seq t := rfl
@[simp] lemma pure_def (a : α) : (pure a : set α) = {a} := rfl
end monad
instance : is_lawful_monad set :=
{ pure_bind := λ α β x f, by simp,
bind_assoc := λ α β γ s f g, set.ext $ λ a,
by simp [exists_and_distrib_right.symm, -exists_and_distrib_right,
exists_and_distrib_left.symm, -exists_and_distrib_left, and_assoc];
exact exists_swap,
id_map := λ α, id_map,
bind_pure_comp_eq_map := λ α β f s, set.ext $ by simp [set.image, eq_comm],
bind_map_eq_seq := λ α β s t, by simp [seq_def] }
instance : is_comm_applicative (set : Type u → Type u) :=
⟨ λ α β s t, prod_image_seq_comm s t ⟩
section pi
variables {π : α → Type*}
lemma pi_def (i : set α) (s : Π a, set (π a)) :
pi i s = (⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a) :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma univ_pi_eq_Inter (t : Π i, set (π i)) : pi univ t = ⋂ i, eval i ⁻¹' t i :=
by simp only [pi_def, Inter_true, mem_univ]
lemma pi_diff_pi_subset (i : set α) (s t : Π a, set (π a)) :
pi i s \ pi i t ⊆ ⋃ a ∈ i, (eval a ⁻¹' (s a \ t a)) :=
begin
refine diff_subset_comm.2 (λ x hx a ha, _),
simp only [mem_diff, mem_pi, mem_Union, not_exists, mem_preimage, not_and, not_not, eval_apply]
at hx,
exact hx.2 _ ha (hx.1 _ ha)
end
lemma Union_univ_pi (t : Π i, ι → set (π i)) :
(⋃ (x : α → ι), pi univ (λ i, t i (x i))) = pi univ (λ i, ⋃ (j : ι), t i j) :=
by { ext, simp [classical.skolem] }
end pi
end set
namespace function
namespace surjective
lemma Union_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : surjective f) (g : ι₂ → set α) :
(⋃ x, g (f x)) = ⋃ y, g y :=
hf.supr_comp g
lemma Inter_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : surjective f) (g : ι₂ → set α) :
(⋂ x, g (f x)) = ⋂ y, g y :=
hf.infi_comp g
end surjective
end function
/-!
### Disjoint sets
We define some lemmas in the `disjoint` namespace to be able to use projection notation.
-/
section disjoint
variables {s t u : set α}
namespace disjoint
theorem union_left (hs : disjoint s u) (ht : disjoint t u) : disjoint (s ∪ t) u :=
hs.sup_left ht
theorem union_right (ht : disjoint s t) (hu : disjoint s u) : disjoint s (t ∪ u) :=
ht.sup_right hu
lemma inter_left (u : set α) (h : disjoint s t) : disjoint (s ∩ u) t :=
inf_left _ h
lemma inter_left' (u : set α) (h : disjoint s t) : disjoint (u ∩ s) t :=
inf_left' _ h
lemma inter_right (u : set α) (h : disjoint s t) : disjoint s (t ∩ u) :=
inf_right _ h
lemma inter_right' (u : set α) (h : disjoint s t) : disjoint s (u ∩ t) :=
inf_right' _ h
lemma preimage {α β} (f : α → β) {s t : set β} (h : disjoint s t) : disjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
λ x hx, h hx
end disjoint
namespace set
protected theorem disjoint_iff : disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t ⊆ ∅ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty : disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
lemma not_disjoint_iff : ¬disjoint s t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
not_forall.trans $ exists_congr $ λ x, not_not
lemma not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter {α : Type*} {s t : set α} :
¬disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).nonempty :=
by simp [set.not_disjoint_iff, set.nonempty_def]
lemma disjoint_left : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
show (∀ x, ¬(x ∈ s ∩ t)) ↔ _, from ⟨λ h a, not_and.1 $ h a, λ h a, not_and.2 $ h a⟩
theorem disjoint_right : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ t → a ∉ s :=
by rw [disjoint.comm, disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (h : s ⊆ u) (d : disjoint u t) : disjoint s t :=
d.mono_left h
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (h : t ⊆ u) (d : disjoint s u) : disjoint s t :=
d.mono_right h
theorem disjoint_of_subset {s t u v : set α} (h1 : s ⊆ u) (h2 : t ⊆ v) (d : disjoint u v) :
disjoint s t :=
d.mono h1 h2
@[simp] theorem disjoint_union_left :
disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ disjoint s u ∧ disjoint t u :=
disjoint_sup_left
@[simp] theorem disjoint_union_right :
disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ disjoint s t ∧ disjoint s u :=
disjoint_sup_right
@[simp] theorem disjoint_Union_left {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → set α} :
disjoint (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, disjoint (s i) t :=
supr_disjoint_iff
@[simp] theorem disjoint_Union_right {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → set α} :
disjoint t (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, disjoint t (s i) :=
disjoint_supr_iff
theorem disjoint_diff {a b : set α} : disjoint a (b \ a) :=
disjoint_iff.2 (inter_diff_self _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_empty (s : set α) : disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right
@[simp] theorem empty_disjoint (s : set α) : disjoint ∅ s := disjoint_bot_left
@[simp] lemma univ_disjoint {s : set α} : disjoint univ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
top_disjoint
@[simp] lemma disjoint_univ {s : set α} : disjoint s univ ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_top
@[simp] theorem disjoint_singleton_left {a : α} {s : set α} : disjoint {a} s ↔ a ∉ s :=
by simp [set.disjoint_iff, subset_def]; exact iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem disjoint_singleton_right {a : α} {s : set α} : disjoint s {a} ↔ a ∉ s :=
by rw [disjoint.comm]; exact disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma disjoint_singleton {a b : α} : disjoint ({a} : set α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b :=
by rw [disjoint_singleton_left, mem_singleton_iff]
theorem disjoint_image_image {f : β → α} {g : γ → α} {s : set β} {t : set γ}
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, f b ≠ g c) : disjoint (f '' s) (g '' t) :=
by rintro a ⟨⟨b, hb, eq⟩, c, hc, rfl⟩; exact h b hb c hc eq
lemma disjoint_image_of_injective {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) {s t : set α}
(hd : disjoint s t) : disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t) :=
disjoint_image_image $ λ x hx y hy, hf.ne $ λ H, set.disjoint_iff.1 hd ⟨hx, H.symm ▸ hy⟩
lemma disjoint_preimage {s t : set β} (hd : disjoint s t) (f : α → β) :
disjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
λ x hx, hd hx
lemma preimage_eq_empty {f : α → β} {s : set β} (h : disjoint s (range f)) :
f ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
by simpa using h.preimage f
lemma preimage_eq_empty_iff {f : α → β} {s : set β} : disjoint s (range f) ↔ f ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
⟨preimage_eq_empty,
λ h, by { simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty] at h ⊢, finish }⟩
lemma disjoint_iff_subset_compl_right :
disjoint s t ↔ s ⊆ tᶜ :=
disjoint_left
lemma disjoint_iff_subset_compl_left :
disjoint s t ↔ t ⊆ sᶜ :=
disjoint_right
end set
end disjoint
namespace set
variables (t : α → set β)
lemma subset_diff {s t u : set α} : s ⊆ t \ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ disjoint s u :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ x hxs, (h hxs).1, λ x ⟨hxs, hxu⟩, (h hxs).2 hxu⟩,
λ ⟨h1, h2⟩ x hxs, ⟨h1 hxs, λ hxu, h2 ⟨hxs, hxu⟩⟩⟩
lemma bUnion_diff_bUnion_subset (s₁ s₂ : set α) :
(⋃ x ∈ s₁, t x) \ (⋃ x ∈ s₂, t x) ⊆ (⋃ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, t x) :=
begin
simp only [diff_subset_iff, ← bUnion_union],
apply bUnion_subset_bUnion_left,
rw union_diff_self,
apply subset_union_right
end
/-- If `t` is an indexed family of sets, then there is a natural map from `Σ i, t i` to `⋃ i, t i`
sending `⟨i, x⟩` to `x`. -/
def sigma_to_Union (x : Σ i, t i) : (⋃ i, t i) := ⟨x.2, mem_Union.2 ⟨x.1, x.2.2⟩⟩
lemma sigma_to_Union_surjective : surjective (sigma_to_Union t)
| ⟨b, hb⟩ := have ∃ a, b ∈ t a, by simpa using hb, let ⟨a, hb⟩ := this in ⟨⟨a, b, hb⟩, rfl⟩
lemma sigma_to_Union_injective (h : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → disjoint (t i) (t j)) :
injective (sigma_to_Union t)
| ⟨a₁, b₁, h₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂, h₂⟩ eq :=
have b_eq : b₁ = b₂, from congr_arg subtype.val eq,
have a_eq : a₁ = a₂, from classical.by_contradiction $ λ ne,
have b₁ ∈ t a₁ ∩ t a₂, from ⟨h₁, b_eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩,
h _ _ ne this,
sigma.eq a_eq $ subtype.eq $ by subst b_eq; subst a_eq
lemma sigma_to_Union_bijective (h : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → disjoint (t i) (t j)) :
bijective (sigma_to_Union t) :=
⟨sigma_to_Union_injective t h, sigma_to_Union_surjective t⟩
/-- Equivalence between a disjoint union and a dependent sum. -/
noncomputable def Union_eq_sigma_of_disjoint {t : α → set β}
(h : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → disjoint (t i) (t j)) : (⋃ i, t i) ≃ (Σ i, t i) :=
(equiv.of_bijective _ $ sigma_to_Union_bijective t h).symm
end set
|
90dec6ea52e7c1ff1958f960338cb0f3ecbfe4a3 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/analysis/special_functions/logb.lean | 50a37e1bc74548613cc2ebcf0d367e323e6d9af0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,243 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Bolton Bailey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bolton Bailey, Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import analysis.special_functions.log
import analysis.special_functions.pow
/-!
# Real logarithm base `b`
In this file we define `real.logb` to be the logarithm of a real number in a given base `b`. We
define this as the division of the natural logarithms of the argument and the base, so that we have
a globally defined function with `logb b 0 = 0`, `logb b (-x) = logb b x` `logb 0 x = 0` and
`logb (-b) x = logb b x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and it's relation to `rpow`.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open set filter function
open_locale topological_space
noncomputable theory
namespace real
variables {b x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm in a given base. As with the natural logarithm, we define `logb b x` to
be `logb b |x|` for `x < 0`, and `0` for `x = 0`.-/
@[pp_nodot] noncomputable def logb (b x : ℝ) : ℝ := log x / log b
lemma log_div_log : log x / log b = logb b x := rfl
@[simp] lemma logb_zero : logb b 0 = 0 := by simp [logb]
@[simp] lemma logb_one : logb b 1 = 0 := by simp [logb]
@[simp] lemma logb_abs (x : ℝ) : logb b (|x|) = logb b x := by rw [logb, logb, log_abs]
@[simp] lemma logb_neg_eq_logb (x : ℝ) : logb b (-x) = logb b x :=
by rw [← logb_abs x, ← logb_abs (-x), abs_neg]
lemma logb_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x * y) = logb b x + logb b y :=
by simp_rw [logb, log_mul hx hy, add_div]
lemma logb_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x / y) = logb b x - logb b y :=
by simp_rw [logb, log_div hx hy, sub_div]
@[simp] lemma logb_inv (x : ℝ) : logb b (x⁻¹) = -logb b x := by simp [logb, neg_div]
section b_pos_and_ne_one
variable (b_pos : 0 < b)
variable (b_ne_one : b ≠ 1)
include b_pos b_ne_one
private lemma log_b_ne_zero : log b ≠ 0 :=
begin
have b_ne_zero : b ≠ 0, linarith,
have b_ne_minus_one : b ≠ -1, linarith,
simp [b_ne_one, b_ne_zero, b_ne_minus_one],
end
@[simp] lemma logb_rpow :
logb b (b ^ x) = x :=
begin
rw [logb, div_eq_iff, log_rpow b_pos],
exact log_b_ne_zero b_pos b_ne_one,
end
lemma rpow_logb_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ (logb b x) = |x| :=
begin
apply log_inj_on_pos,
simp only [set.mem_Ioi],
apply rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos,
simp only [abs_pos, mem_Ioi, ne.def, hx, not_false_iff],
rw [log_rpow b_pos, logb, log_abs],
field_simp [log_b_ne_zero b_pos b_ne_one],
end
@[simp] lemma rpow_logb (hx : 0 < x) : b ^ (logb b x) = x :=
by { rw rpow_logb_eq_abs b_pos b_ne_one (hx.ne'), exact abs_of_pos hx, }
lemma rpow_logb_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : b ^ (logb b x) = -x :=
by { rw rpow_logb_eq_abs b_pos b_ne_one (ne_of_lt hx), exact abs_of_neg hx }
lemma surj_on_logb : surj_on (logb b) (Ioi 0) univ :=
λ x _, ⟨rpow b x, rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos x, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one⟩
lemma logb_surjective : surjective (logb b) :=
λ x, ⟨b ^ x, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one⟩
@[simp] lemma range_logb : range (logb b) = univ :=
(logb_surjective b_pos b_ne_one).range_eq
lemma surj_on_logb' : surj_on (logb b) (Iio 0) univ :=
begin
intros x x_in_univ,
use -b ^ x,
split,
{ simp only [right.neg_neg_iff, set.mem_Iio], apply rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos, },
{ rw [logb_neg_eq_logb, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one], },
end
end b_pos_and_ne_one
section one_lt_b
variable (hb : 1 < b)
include hb
private lemma b_pos : 0 < b := by linarith
private lemma b_ne_one : b ≠ 1 := by linarith
@[simp] lemma logb_le_logb (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) :
logb b x ≤ logb b y ↔ x ≤ y :=
by { rw [logb, logb, div_le_div_right (log_pos hb), log_le_log h h₁], }
lemma logb_lt_logb (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) : logb b x < logb b y :=
by { rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right (log_pos hb)], exact log_lt_log hx hxy, }
@[simp] lemma logb_lt_logb_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) :
logb b x < logb b y ↔ x < y :=
by { rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right (log_pos hb)], exact log_lt_log_iff hx hy, }
lemma logb_le_iff_le_rpow (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ b ^ y :=
by rw [←rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one hb) hx]
lemma logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x < y ↔ x < b ^ y :=
by rw [←rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one hb) hx]
lemma le_logb_iff_rpow_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ logb b y ↔ b ^ x ≤ y :=
by rw [←rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one hb) hy]
lemma lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < logb b y ↔ b ^ x < y :=
by rw [←rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one hb) hy]
lemma logb_pos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < logb b x ↔ 1 < x :=
by { rw ← @logb_one b, rw logb_lt_logb_iff hb zero_lt_one hx, }
lemma logb_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < logb b x :=
by { rw logb_pos_iff hb (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx), exact hx, }
lemma logb_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : logb b x < 0 ↔ x < 1 :=
by { rw ← logb_one, exact logb_lt_logb_iff hb h zero_lt_one, }
lemma logb_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : logb b x < 0 :=
(logb_neg_iff hb h0).2 h1
lemma logb_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ logb b x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
by rw [← not_lt, logb_neg_iff hb hx, not_lt]
lemma logb_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ logb b x :=
(logb_nonneg_iff hb (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
lemma logb_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 :=
by rw [← not_lt, logb_pos_iff hb hx, not_lt]
lemma logb_nonpos_iff' (hx : 0 ≤ x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 :=
begin
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl|hx),
{ simp [le_refl, zero_le_one] },
exact logb_nonpos_iff hb hx,
end
lemma logb_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : logb b x ≤ 0 :=
(logb_nonpos_iff' hb hx).2 h'x
lemma strict_mono_on_logb : strict_mono_on (logb b) (set.Ioi 0) :=
λ x hx y hy hxy, logb_lt_logb hb hx hxy
lemma strict_anti_on_logb : strict_anti_on (logb b) (set.Iio 0) :=
begin
rintros x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy,
rw [← logb_abs y, ← logb_abs x],
refine logb_lt_logb hb (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) _,
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff],
end
lemma logb_inj_on_pos : set.inj_on (logb b) (set.Ioi 0) :=
(strict_mono_on_logb hb).inj_on
lemma eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : logb b x = 0) :
x = 1 :=
logb_inj_on_pos hb (set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one)
(h₂.trans real.logb_one.symm)
lemma logb_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) :
logb b x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero hb hx_pos) hx
lemma tendsto_logb_at_top : tendsto (logb b) at_top at_top :=
tendsto.at_top_div_const (log_pos hb) tendsto_log_at_top
end one_lt_b
section b_pos_and_b_lt_one
variable (b_pos : 0 < b)
variable (b_lt_one : b < 1)
include b_lt_one
private lemma b_ne_one : b ≠ 1 := by linarith
include b_pos
@[simp] lemma logb_le_logb_of_base_lt_one (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) :
logb b x ≤ logb b y ↔ y ≤ x :=
by { rw [logb, logb, div_le_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one), log_le_log h₁ h], }
lemma logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) : logb b y < logb b x :=
by { rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one)], exact log_lt_log hx hxy, }
@[simp] lemma logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) :
logb b x < logb b y ↔ y < x :=
by { rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one)], exact log_lt_log_iff hy hx }
lemma logb_le_iff_le_rpow_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ y ↔ b ^ y ≤ x :=
by rw [←rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hx]
lemma logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x < y ↔ b ^ y < x :=
by rw [←rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hx]
lemma le_logb_iff_rpow_le_of_base_lt_one (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ logb b y ↔ y ≤ b ^ x :=
by rw [←rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hy]
lemma lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt_of_base_lt_one (hy : 0 < y) : x < logb b y ↔ y < b ^ x :=
by rw [←rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hy]
lemma logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < logb b x ↔ x < 1 :=
by rw [← @logb_one b, logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one zero_lt_one hx]
lemma logb_pos_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x < 1) : 0 < logb b x :=
by { rw logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx, exact hx', }
lemma logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one (h : 0 < x) : logb b x < 0 ↔ 1 < x :=
by rw [← @logb_one b, logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one h zero_lt_one]
lemma logb_neg_of_base_lt_one (h1 : 1 < x) : logb b x < 0 :=
(logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (lt_trans zero_lt_one h1)).2 h1
lemma logb_nonneg_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ logb b x ↔ x ≤ 1 :=
by rw [← not_lt, logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx, not_lt]
lemma logb_nonneg_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x ≤ 1) : 0 ≤ logb b x :=
by {rw [logb_nonneg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx], exact hx' }
lemma logb_nonpos_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
by rw [← not_lt, logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx, not_lt]
lemma strict_anti_on_logb_of_base_lt_one : strict_anti_on (logb b) (set.Ioi 0) :=
λ x hx y hy hxy, logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx hxy
lemma strict_mono_on_logb_of_base_lt_one : strict_mono_on (logb b) (set.Iio 0) :=
begin
rintros x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy,
rw [← logb_abs y, ← logb_abs x],
refine logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) _,
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff],
end
lemma logb_inj_on_pos_of_base_lt_one : set.inj_on (logb b) (set.Ioi 0) :=
(strict_anti_on_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one).inj_on
lemma eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero_of_base_lt_one (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : logb b x = 0) :
x = 1 :=
logb_inj_on_pos_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one)
(h₂.trans real.logb_one.symm)
lemma logb_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one_of_base_lt_one (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) :
logb b x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx_pos) hx
lemma tendsto_logb_at_top_of_base_lt_one : tendsto (logb b) at_top at_bot :=
begin
rw tendsto_at_top_at_bot,
intro e,
use 1 ⊔ b ^ e,
intro a,
simp only [and_imp, sup_le_iff],
intro ha,
rw logb_le_iff_le_rpow_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one,
tauto,
exact lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one ha,
end
end b_pos_and_b_lt_one
@[simp] lemma logb_eq_zero :
logb b x = 0 ↔ b = 0 ∨ b = 1 ∨ b = -1 ∨ x = 0 ∨ x = 1 ∨ x = -1 :=
begin
simp_rw [logb, div_eq_zero_iff, log_eq_zero],
tauto,
end
/- TODO add other limits and continuous API lemmas analogous to those in log.lean -/
open_locale big_operators
lemma logb_prod {α : Type*} (s : finset α) (f : α → ℝ) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0):
logb b (∏ i in s, f i) = ∑ i in s, logb b (f i) :=
begin
classical,
induction s using finset.induction_on with a s ha ih,
{ simp },
simp only [finset.mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp] at hf,
simp [ha, ih hf.2, logb_mul hf.1 (finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.2 hf.2)],
end
end real
|
43de5124c8d556922141240f716d47e9c7d38fce | e6b8240a90527fd55d42d0ec6649253d5d0bd414 | /src/topology/uniform_space/basic.lean | c612ad75592f7105e5a5c2d0c64f7975c069495d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mattearnshaw/mathlib | ac90f9fb8168aa642223bea3ffd0286b0cfde44f | d8dc1445cf8a8c74f8df60b9f7a1f5cf10946666 | refs/heads/master | 1,606,308,351,137 | 1,576,594,130,000 | 1,576,594,130,000 | 228,666,195 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,603,094,000 | 1,576,603,093,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 42,043 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
Theory of uniform spaces.
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups. Many concepts directly
generalize to uniform spaces, e.g.
* completeness
* extension of uniform continuous functions to complete spaces
* uniform contiunuity & embedding
* totally bounded
* totally bounded ∧ complete → compact
The central concept of uniform spaces is its uniformity: a filter relating two elements of the
space. This filter is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. So a set (i.e. a relation) in this filter
represents a 'distance': it is reflexive, symmetric and the uniformity contains a set for which the
`triangular` rule holds.
The formalization is mostly based on the books:
N. Bourbaki: General Topology
I. M. James: Topologies and Uniformities
A major difference is that this formalization is heavily based on the filter library.
-/
import order.filter.basic order.filter.lift topology.separation
open set lattice filter classical
open_locale classical topological_space
set_option eqn_compiler.zeta true
universes u
section
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-- The identity relation, or the graph of the identity function -/
def id_rel {α : Type*} := {p : α × α | p.1 = p.2}
@[simp] theorem mem_id_rel {a b : α} : (a, b) ∈ @id_rel α ↔ a = b := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem id_rel_subset {s : set (α × α)} : id_rel ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a, (a, a) ∈ s :=
by simp [subset_def]; exact forall_congr (λ a, by simp)
/-- The composition of relations -/
def comp_rel {α : Type u} (r₁ r₂ : set (α×α)) := {p : α × α | ∃z:α, (p.1, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ r₂}
@[simp] theorem mem_comp_rel {r₁ r₂ : set (α×α)}
{x y : α} : (x, y) ∈ comp_rel r₁ r₂ ↔ ∃ z, (x, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, y) ∈ r₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem swap_id_rel : prod.swap '' id_rel = @id_rel α :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, by simp [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]; exact eq_comm
theorem monotone_comp_rel [preorder β] {f g : β → set (α×α)}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λx, comp_rel (f x) (g x)) :=
assume a b h p ⟨z, h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨z, hf h h₁, hg h h₂⟩
lemma prod_mk_mem_comp_rel {a b c : α} {s t : set (α×α)} (h₁ : (a, c) ∈ s) (h₂ : (c, b) ∈ t) :
(a, b) ∈ comp_rel s t :=
⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩
@[simp] lemma id_comp_rel {r : set (α×α)} : comp_rel id_rel r = r :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, by simp
lemma comp_rel_assoc {r s t : set (α×α)} :
comp_rel (comp_rel r s) t = comp_rel r (comp_rel s t) :=
by ext p; cases p; simp only [mem_comp_rel]; tauto
/-- This core description of a uniform space is outside of the type class hierarchy. It is useful
for constructions of uniform spaces, when the topology is derived from the uniform space. -/
structure uniform_space.core (α : Type u) :=
(uniformity : filter (α × α))
(refl : principal id_rel ≤ uniformity)
(symm : tendsto prod.swap uniformity uniformity)
(comp : uniformity.lift' (λs, comp_rel s s) ≤ uniformity)
def uniform_space.core.mk' {α : Type u} (U : filter (α × α))
(refl : ∀ (r ∈ U) x, (x, x) ∈ r)
(symm : ∀ r ∈ U, {p | prod.swap p ∈ r} ∈ U)
(comp : ∀ r ∈ U, ∃ t ∈ U, comp_rel t t ⊆ r) : uniform_space.core α :=
⟨U, λ r ru, id_rel_subset.2 (refl _ ru), symm,
begin
intros r ru,
rw [mem_lift'_sets],
exact comp _ ru,
apply monotone_comp_rel; exact monotone_id,
end⟩
/-- A uniform space generates a topological space -/
def uniform_space.core.to_topological_space {α : Type u} (u : uniform_space.core α) :
topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λs, ∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ u.uniformity,
is_open_univ := by simp; intro; exact univ_mem_sets,
is_open_inter :=
assume s t hs ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩, by filter_upwards [hs x xs, ht x xt]; simp {contextual := tt},
is_open_sUnion :=
assume s hs x ⟨t, ts, xt⟩, by filter_upwards [hs t ts x xt] assume p ph h, ⟨t, ts, ph h⟩ }
lemma uniform_space.core_eq : ∀{u₁ u₂ : uniform_space.core α}, u₁.uniformity = u₂.uniformity → u₁ = u₂
| ⟨u₁, _, _, _⟩ ⟨u₂, _, _, _⟩ h := have u₁ = u₂, from h, by simp [*]
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A uniform space is a generalization of the "uniform" topological aspects of a
metric space. It consists of a filter on `α × α` called the "uniformity", which
satisfies properties analogous to the reflexivity, symmetry, and triangle properties
of a metric.
A metric space has a natural uniformity, and a uniform space has a natural topology.
A topological group also has a natural uniformity, even when it is not metrizable. -/
class uniform_space (α : Type u) extends topological_space α, uniform_space.core α :=
(is_open_uniformity : ∀s, is_open s ↔ (∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ uniformity))
end prio
@[pattern] def uniform_space.mk' {α} (t : topological_space α)
(c : uniform_space.core α)
(is_open_uniformity : ∀s:set α, t.is_open s ↔
(∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ c.uniformity)) :
uniform_space α := ⟨c, is_open_uniformity⟩
def uniform_space.of_core {α : Type u} (u : uniform_space.core α) : uniform_space α :=
{ to_core := u,
to_topological_space := u.to_topological_space,
is_open_uniformity := assume a, iff.rfl }
def uniform_space.of_core_eq {α : Type u} (u : uniform_space.core α) (t : topological_space α)
(h : t = u.to_topological_space) : uniform_space α :=
{ to_core := u,
to_topological_space := t,
is_open_uniformity := assume a, h.symm ▸ iff.rfl }
lemma uniform_space.to_core_to_topological_space (u : uniform_space α) :
u.to_core.to_topological_space = u.to_topological_space :=
topological_space_eq $ funext $ assume s,
by rw [uniform_space.core.to_topological_space, uniform_space.is_open_uniformity]
@[ext]
lemma uniform_space_eq : ∀{u₁ u₂ : uniform_space α}, u₁.uniformity = u₂.uniformity → u₁ = u₂
| (uniform_space.mk' t₁ u₁ o₁) (uniform_space.mk' t₂ u₂ o₂) h :=
have u₁ = u₂, from uniform_space.core_eq h,
have t₁ = t₂, from topological_space_eq $ funext $ assume s, by rw [o₁, o₂]; simp [this],
by simp [*]
lemma uniform_space.of_core_eq_to_core
(u : uniform_space α) (t : topological_space α) (h : t = u.to_core.to_topological_space) :
uniform_space.of_core_eq u.to_core t h = u :=
uniform_space_eq rfl
section uniform_space
variables [uniform_space α]
/-- The uniformity is a filter on α × α (inferred from an ambient uniform space
structure on α). -/
def uniformity (α : Type u) [uniform_space α] : filter (α × α) :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).uniformity
localized "notation `𝓤` := uniformity" in uniformity
lemma is_open_uniformity {s : set α} :
is_open s ↔ (∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α) :=
uniform_space.is_open_uniformity s
lemma refl_le_uniformity : principal id_rel ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).refl
lemma refl_mem_uniformity {x : α} {s : set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
(x, x) ∈ s :=
refl_le_uniformity h rfl
lemma symm_le_uniformity : map (@prod.swap α α) (𝓤 _) ≤ (𝓤 _) :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).symm
lemma comp_le_uniformity : (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), comp_rel s s) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).comp
lemma tendsto_swap_uniformity : tendsto (@prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α) (𝓤 α) :=
symm_le_uniformity
lemma tendsto_const_uniformity {a : α} {f : filter β} : tendsto (λ _, (a, a)) f (𝓤 α) :=
assume s hs,
show {x | (a, a) ∈ s} ∈ f,
from univ_mem_sets' $ assume b, refl_mem_uniformity hs
lemma comp_mem_uniformity_sets {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, comp_rel t t ⊆ s :=
have s ∈ (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set (α×α), comp_rel t t),
from comp_le_uniformity hs,
(mem_lift'_sets $ monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id).mp this
lemma symm_of_uniformity {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀a b, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ t ⊆ s :=
have preimage prod.swap s ∈ 𝓤 α, from symm_le_uniformity hs,
⟨s ∩ preimage prod.swap s, inter_mem_sets hs this, assume a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₂, h₁⟩, inter_subset_left _ _⟩
lemma comp_symm_of_uniformity {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀{a b}, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ comp_rel t t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs in
let ⟨t', ht', ht'₁, ht'₂⟩ := symm_of_uniformity ht₁ in
⟨t', ht', ht'₁, subset.trans (monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id ht'₂) ht₂⟩
lemma uniformity_le_symm : 𝓤 α ≤ (@prod.swap α α) <$> 𝓤 α :=
by rw [map_swap_eq_comap_swap];
from map_le_iff_le_comap.1 tendsto_swap_uniformity
lemma uniformity_eq_symm : 𝓤 α = (@prod.swap α α) <$> 𝓤 α :=
le_antisymm uniformity_le_symm symm_le_uniformity
theorem uniformity_lift_le_swap {g : set (α×α) → filter β} {f : filter β} (hg : monotone g)
(h : (𝓤 α).lift (λs, g (preimage prod.swap s)) ≤ f) : (𝓤 α).lift g ≤ f :=
calc (𝓤 α).lift g ≤ (filter.map (@prod.swap α α) $ 𝓤 α).lift g :
lift_mono uniformity_le_symm (le_refl _)
... ≤ _ :
by rw [map_lift_eq2 hg, image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]; exact h
lemma uniformity_lift_le_comp {f : set (α×α) → filter β} (h : monotone f) :
(𝓤 α).lift (λs, f (comp_rel s s)) ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f :=
calc (𝓤 α).lift (λs, f (comp_rel s s)) =
((𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), comp_rel s s)).lift f :
begin
rw [lift_lift'_assoc],
exact monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id,
exact h
end
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f : lift_mono comp_le_uniformity (le_refl _)
lemma comp_le_uniformity3 :
(𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), comp_rel s (comp_rel s s)) ≤ (𝓤 α) :=
calc (𝓤 α).lift' (λd, comp_rel d (comp_rel d d)) =
(𝓤 α).lift (λs, (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set(α×α), comp_rel s (comp_rel t t))) :
begin
rw [lift_lift'_same_eq_lift'],
exact (assume x, monotone_comp_rel monotone_const $ monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id),
exact (assume x, monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_const),
end
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift (λs, (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set(α×α), comp_rel s t)) :
lift_mono' $ assume s hs, @uniformity_lift_le_comp α _ _ (principal ∘ comp_rel s) $
monotone_principal.comp (monotone_comp_rel monotone_const monotone_id)
... = (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set(α×α), comp_rel s s) :
lift_lift'_same_eq_lift'
(assume s, monotone_comp_rel monotone_const monotone_id)
(assume s, monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_const)
... ≤ (𝓤 α) : comp_le_uniformity
lemma mem_nhds_uniformity_iff {x : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ {p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s} ∈ 𝓤 α :=
⟨ begin
simp only [mem_nhds_sets_iff, is_open_uniformity, and_imp, exists_imp_distrib],
exact assume t ts ht xt, by filter_upwards [ht x xt] assume ⟨x', y⟩ h eq, ts $ h eq
end,
assume hs,
mem_nhds_sets_iff.mpr ⟨{x | {p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s} ∈ 𝓤 α},
assume x' hx', refl_mem_uniformity hx' rfl,
is_open_uniformity.mpr $ assume x' hx',
let ⟨t, ht, tr⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hx' in
by filter_upwards [ht] assume ⟨a, b⟩ hp' (hax' : a = x'),
by filter_upwards [ht] assume ⟨a, b'⟩ hp'' (hab : a = b),
have hp : (x', b) ∈ t, from hax' ▸ hp',
have (b, b') ∈ t, from hab ▸ hp'',
have (x', b') ∈ comp_rel t t, from ⟨b, hp, this⟩,
show b' ∈ s,
from tr this rfl,
hs⟩⟩
lemma nhds_eq_comap_uniformity {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).comap (prod.mk x) :=
by ext s; rw [mem_nhds_uniformity_iff, mem_comap_sets]; from iff.intro
(assume hs, ⟨_, hs, assume x hx, hx rfl⟩)
(assume ⟨t, h, ht⟩, (𝓤 α).sets_of_superset h $
assume ⟨p₁, p₂⟩ hp (h : p₁ = x), ht $ by simp [h.symm, hp])
lemma nhds_eq_uniformity {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) :=
begin
ext s,
rw [mem_lift'_sets], tactic.swap, apply monotone_preimage,
simp [mem_nhds_uniformity_iff],
exact ⟨assume h, ⟨_, h, assume y h, h rfl⟩,
assume ⟨t, h₁, h₂⟩,
(𝓤 α).sets_of_superset h₁ $
assume ⟨x', y⟩ hp (eq : x' = x), h₂ $
show (x, y) ∈ t, from eq ▸ hp⟩
end
lemma mem_nhds_left (x : α) {s : set (α×α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
{y : α | (x, y) ∈ s} ∈ 𝓝 x :=
have 𝓝 x ≤ principal {y : α | (x, y) ∈ s},
by rw [nhds_eq_uniformity]; exact infi_le_of_le s (infi_le _ h),
by simp at this; assumption
lemma mem_nhds_right (y : α) {s : set (α×α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
{x : α | (x, y) ∈ s} ∈ 𝓝 y :=
mem_nhds_left _ (symm_le_uniformity h)
lemma tendsto_right_nhds_uniformity {a : α} : tendsto (λa', (a', a)) (𝓝 a) (𝓤 α) :=
assume s, mem_nhds_right a
lemma tendsto_left_nhds_uniformity {a : α} : tendsto (λa', (a, a')) (𝓝 a) (𝓤 α) :=
assume s, mem_nhds_left a
lemma lift_nhds_left {x : α} {g : set α → filter β} (hg : monotone g) :
(𝓝 x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) :=
eq.trans
begin
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity],
exact (filter.lift_assoc $ monotone_principal.comp $ monotone_preimage.comp monotone_preimage )
end
(congr_arg _ $ funext $ assume s, filter.lift_principal hg)
lemma lift_nhds_right {x : α} {g : set α → filter β} (hg : monotone g) :
(𝓝 x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (y, x) ∈ s}) :=
calc (𝓝 x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) : lift_nhds_left hg
... = ((@prod.swap α α) <$> (𝓤 α)).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) : by rw [←uniformity_eq_symm]
... = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ image prod.swap s}) :
map_lift_eq2 $ hg.comp monotone_preimage
... = _ : by simp [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
lemma nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
filter.prod (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) =
(𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set (α×α),
set.prod {y : α | (y, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ t})) :=
begin
rw [prod_def],
show (𝓝 a).lift (λs:set α, (𝓝 b).lift (λt:set α, principal (set.prod s t))) = _,
rw [lift_nhds_right],
apply congr_arg, funext s,
rw [lift_nhds_left],
refl,
exact monotone_principal.comp (monotone_prod monotone_const monotone_id),
exact (monotone_lift' monotone_const $ monotone_lam $
assume x, monotone_prod monotone_id monotone_const)
end
lemma nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), set.prod {y : α | (y, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ s}) :=
begin
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift'],
{ intro s, exact monotone_prod monotone_const monotone_preimage },
{ intro t, exact monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_const }
end
lemma nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : set (α×α)} (s : set (α×α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃(t : set (α×α)), is_open t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ t ⊆ {p | ∃x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d} :=
let cl_d := {p:α×α | ∃x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d} in
have ∀p ∈ s, ∃t ⊆ cl_d, is_open t ∧ p ∈ t, from
assume ⟨x, y⟩ hp, mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp $
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y),
begin
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets],
exact ⟨d, hd, assume ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩,
exact monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_preimage
end,
have ∃t:(Π(p:α×α) (h:p ∈ s), set (α×α)),
∀p, ∀h:p ∈ s, t p h ⊆ cl_d ∧ is_open (t p h) ∧ p ∈ t p h,
by simp [classical.skolem] at this; simp; assumption,
match this with
| ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
⟨(⋃ p:α×α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : set (α×α)),
is_open_Union $ assume (p:α×α), is_open_Union $ assume hp, (ht p hp).right.left,
assume ⟨a, b⟩ hp, begin simp; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a,b) hp).right.right⟩ end,
Union_subset $ assume p, Union_subset $ assume hp, (ht p hp).left⟩
end
lemma closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : set (α×α)} :
closure t = (⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, comp_rel d (comp_rel t d)) :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩,
calc (a, b) ∈ closure t ↔ (𝓝 (a, b) ⊓ principal t ≠ ⊥) : by simp [closure_eq_nhds]
... ↔ (((@prod.swap α α) <$> 𝓤 α).lift'
(λ (s : set (α × α)), set.prod {x : α | (x, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ s}) ⊓ principal t ≠ ⊥) :
by rw [←uniformity_eq_symm, nhds_eq_uniformity_prod]
... ↔ ((map (@prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α)).lift'
(λ (s : set (α × α)), set.prod {x : α | (x, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ s}) ⊓ principal t ≠ ⊥) :
by refl
... ↔ ((𝓤 α).lift'
(λ (s : set (α × α)), set.prod {y : α | (a, y) ∈ s} {x : α | (x, b) ∈ s}) ⊓ principal t ≠ ⊥) :
begin
rw [map_lift'_eq2],
simp [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, function.comp],
exact monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_preimage
end
... ↔ (∀s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃x, x ∈ set.prod {y : α | (a, y) ∈ s} {x : α | (x, b) ∈ s} ∩ t) :
begin
rw [lift'_inf_principal_eq, lift'_neq_bot_iff],
apply forall_congr, intro s, rw [ne_empty_iff_exists_mem],
exact monotone_inter (monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_preimage) monotone_const
end
... ↔ (∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, (a, b) ∈ comp_rel s (comp_rel t s)) :
forall_congr $ assume s, forall_congr $ assume hs,
⟨assume ⟨⟨x, y⟩, ⟨⟨hx, hy⟩, hxyt⟩⟩, ⟨x, hx, y, hxyt, hy⟩,
assume ⟨x, hx, y, hxyt, hy⟩, ⟨⟨x, y⟩, ⟨⟨hx, hy⟩, hxyt⟩⟩⟩
... ↔ _ : by simp
lemma uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, by simp; filter_upwards [hs] subset_closure)
(calc (𝓤 α).lift' closure ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' (λd, comp_rel d (comp_rel d d)) :
lift'_mono' (by intros s hs; rw [closure_eq_inter_uniformity]; exact bInter_subset_of_mem hs)
... ≤ (𝓤 α) : comp_le_uniformity3)
lemma uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume d, le_infi $ assume hd,
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := (mem_lift'_sets $
monotone_comp_rel monotone_id $ monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id).mp (comp_le_uniformity3 hd) in
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs in
have s ⊆ interior d, from
calc s ⊆ t : hst
... ⊆ interior d : (subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open ht).mpr $
assume x, assume : x ∈ t, let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp this in hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩,
have interior d ∈ 𝓤 α, by filter_upwards [hs] this,
by simp [this])
(assume s hs, ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset)
lemma interior_mem_uniformity {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
interior s ∈ 𝓤 α :=
by rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
lemma mem_uniformity_is_closed {s : set (α×α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃t ∈ 𝓤 α, is_closed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
have s ∈ (𝓤 α).lift' closure, by rwa [uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure] at h,
have ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, closure t ⊆ s,
by rwa [mem_lift'_sets] at this; apply closure_mono,
let ⟨t, ht, hst⟩ := this in
⟨closure t, (𝓤 α).sets_of_superset ht subset_closure, is_closed_closure, hst⟩
/- uniform continuity -/
def uniform_continuous [uniform_space β] (f : α → β) :=
tendsto (λx:α×α, (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 α) (𝓤 β)
theorem uniform_continuous_def [uniform_space β] {f : α → β} :
uniform_continuous f ↔ ∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β,
{x : α × α | (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r} ∈ 𝓤 α :=
iff.rfl
lemma uniform_continuous_of_const [uniform_space β] {c : α → β} (h : ∀a b, c a = c b) :
uniform_continuous c :=
have (λ (x : α × α), (c (x.fst), c (x.snd))) ⁻¹' id_rel = univ, from
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, h a b,
le_trans (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ by simp [comap_principal, this, univ_mem_sets]) refl_le_uniformity
lemma uniform_continuous_id : uniform_continuous (@id α) :=
by simp [uniform_continuous]; exact tendsto_id
lemma uniform_continuous_const [uniform_space β] {b : β} : uniform_continuous (λa:α, b) :=
@tendsto_const_uniformity _ _ _ b (𝓤 α)
lemma uniform_continuous.comp [uniform_space β] [uniform_space γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
(hg : uniform_continuous g) (hf : uniform_continuous f) : uniform_continuous (g ∘ f) :=
hg.comp hf
end uniform_space
end
open_locale uniformity
section constructions
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
instance : partial_order (uniform_space α) :=
{ le := λt s, t.uniformity ≤ s.uniformity,
le_antisymm := assume t s h₁ h₂, uniform_space_eq $ le_antisymm h₁ h₂,
le_refl := assume t, le_refl _,
le_trans := assume a b c h₁ h₂, le_trans h₁ h₂ }
instance : has_Inf (uniform_space α) :=
⟨assume s, uniform_space.of_core {
uniformity := (⨅u∈s, @uniformity α u),
refl := le_infi $ assume u, le_infi $ assume hu, u.refl,
symm := le_infi $ assume u, le_infi $ assume hu,
le_trans (map_mono $ infi_le_of_le _ $ infi_le _ hu) u.symm,
comp := le_infi $ assume u, le_infi $ assume hu,
le_trans (lift'_mono (infi_le_of_le _ $ infi_le _ hu) $ le_refl _) u.comp }⟩
private lemma Inf_le {tt : set (uniform_space α)} {t : uniform_space α} (h : t ∈ tt) :
Inf tt ≤ t :=
show (⨅u∈tt, @uniformity α u) ≤ t.uniformity,
from infi_le_of_le t $ infi_le _ h
private lemma le_Inf {tt : set (uniform_space α)} {t : uniform_space α} (h : ∀t'∈tt, t ≤ t') :
t ≤ Inf tt :=
show t.uniformity ≤ (⨅u∈tt, @uniformity α u),
from le_infi $ assume t', le_infi $ assume ht', h t' ht'
instance : has_top (uniform_space α) :=
⟨uniform_space.of_core { uniformity := ⊤, refl := le_top, symm := le_top, comp := le_top }⟩
instance : has_bot (uniform_space α) :=
⟨{ to_topological_space := ⊥,
uniformity := principal id_rel,
refl := le_refl _,
symm := by simp [tendsto]; apply subset.refl,
comp :=
begin
rw [lift'_principal], {simp},
exact monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id
end,
is_open_uniformity :=
assume s, by simp [is_open_fold, subset_def, id_rel] {contextual := tt } } ⟩
instance : complete_lattice (uniform_space α) :=
{ sup := λa b, Inf {x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x},
le_sup_left := λ a b, le_Inf (λ _ ⟨h, _⟩, h),
le_sup_right := λ a b, le_Inf (λ _ ⟨_, h⟩, h),
sup_le := λ a b c h₁ h₂, Inf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
inf := λ a b, Inf {a, b},
le_inf := λ a b c h₁ h₂, le_Inf (λ u h,
by { cases h, exact h.symm ▸ h₂, exact (mem_singleton_iff.1 h).symm ▸ h₁ }),
inf_le_left := λ a b, Inf_le (by simp),
inf_le_right := λ a b, Inf_le (by simp),
top := ⊤,
le_top := λ a, show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤, from le_top,
bot := ⊥,
bot_le := λ u, u.refl,
Sup := λ tt, Inf {t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t},
le_Sup := λ s u h, le_Inf (λ u' h', h' u h),
Sup_le := λ s u h, Inf_le h,
Inf := Inf,
le_Inf := λ s a hs, le_Inf hs,
Inf_le := λ s a ha, Inf_le ha,
..uniform_space.partial_order }
lemma infi_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → uniform_space α} :
(infi u).uniformity = (⨅i, (u i).uniformity) :=
show (⨅a (h : ∃i:ι, u i = a), a.uniformity) = _, from
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le (u i) $ infi_le _ ⟨i, rfl⟩)
(le_infi $ assume a, le_infi $ assume ⟨i, (ha : u i = a)⟩, ha ▸ infi_le _ _)
lemma inf_uniformity {u v : uniform_space α} :
(u ⊓ v).uniformity = u.uniformity ⊓ v.uniformity :=
have (u ⊓ v) = (⨅i (h : i = u ∨ i = v), i), by simp [infi_or, infi_inf_eq],
calc (u ⊓ v).uniformity = ((⨅i (h : i = u ∨ i = v), i) : uniform_space α).uniformity : by rw [this]
... = _ : by simp [infi_uniformity, infi_or, infi_inf_eq]
instance inhabited_uniform_space : inhabited (uniform_space α) := ⟨⊥⟩
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`. -/
def uniform_space.comap (f : α → β) (u : uniform_space β) : uniform_space α :=
{ uniformity := u.uniformity.comap (λp:α×α, (f p.1, f p.2)),
to_topological_space := u.to_topological_space.induced f,
refl := le_trans (by simp; exact assume ⟨a, b⟩ (h : a = b), h ▸ rfl) (comap_mono u.refl),
symm := by simp [tendsto_comap_iff, prod.swap, (∘)]; exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap,
comp := le_trans
begin
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2],
exact (lift'_mono' $ assume s hs ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩),
repeat { exact monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id }
end
(comap_mono u.comp),
is_open_uniformity := λ s, begin
change (@is_open α (u.to_topological_space.induced f) s ↔ _),
simp [is_open_iff_nhds, nhds_induced, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff, filter.comap, and_comm],
refine ball_congr (λ x hx, ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintro ⟨t, hts, ht⟩, refine ⟨_, ht, _⟩,
rintro ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ h rfl, exact hts (h rfl) },
{ rintro ⟨t, ht, hts⟩,
exact ⟨{y | (f x, y) ∈ t}, λ y hy, @hts (x, y) hy rfl,
mem_nhds_uniformity_iff.1 $ mem_nhds_left _ ht⟩ }
end }
lemma uniform_space_comap_id {α : Type*} : uniform_space.comap (id : α → α) = id :=
by ext u ; dsimp [uniform_space.comap] ; rw [prod.id_prod, filter.comap_id]
lemma uniform_space.comap_comap_comp {α β γ} [uγ : uniform_space γ] {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
uniform_space.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = uniform_space.comap f (uniform_space.comap g uγ) :=
by ext ; dsimp [uniform_space.comap] ; rw filter.comap_comap_comp
lemma uniform_continuous_iff {α β} [uα : uniform_space α] [uβ : uniform_space β] {f : α → β} :
uniform_continuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
lemma uniform_continuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : uniform_space β] :
@uniform_continuous α β (uniform_space.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem to_topological_space_comap {f : α → β} {u : uniform_space β} :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space _ (uniform_space.comap f u) =
topological_space.induced f (@uniform_space.to_topological_space β u) := rfl
lemma uniform_continuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : uniform_space β] [u : uniform_space α]
(h : uniform_continuous (f ∘ g)) : @uniform_continuous α γ u (uniform_space.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
lemma to_topological_space_mono {u₁ u₂ : uniform_space α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space _ u₁ ≤ @uniform_space.to_topological_space _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds $ assume a,
by rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact (lift'_mono h $ le_refl _)
lemma uniform_continuous.continuous [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] {f : α → β}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) : continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr $ to_topological_space_mono $ uniform_continuous_iff.1 hf
lemma to_topological_space_bot : @uniform_space.to_topological_space α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
lemma to_topological_space_top : @uniform_space.to_topological_space α ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ assume s hs, classical.by_cases
(assume : s = ∅, this.symm ▸ @is_open_empty _ ⊤)
(assume : s ≠ ∅,
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_mem_of_ne_empty this in
have s = univ, from top_unique $ assume y hy, hs x hx (x, y) rfl,
this.symm ▸ @is_open_univ _ ⊤)
lemma to_topological_space_infi {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → uniform_space α} :
(infi u).to_topological_space = ⨅i, (u i).to_topological_space :=
classical.by_cases
(assume h : nonempty ι,
eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds $ assume a,
begin
rw [nhds_infi, nhds_eq_uniformity],
change (infi u).uniformity.lift' (preimage $ prod.mk a) = _,
begin
rw [infi_uniformity, lift'_infi],
exact (congr_arg _ $ funext $ assume i, (@nhds_eq_uniformity α (u i) a).symm),
exact h,
exact assume a b, rfl
end
end)
(assume : ¬ nonempty ι,
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, to_topological_space_mono $ infi_le _ _)
(have infi u = ⊤, from top_unique $ le_infi $ assume i, (this ⟨i⟩).elim,
have @uniform_space.to_topological_space _ (infi u) = ⊤,
from this.symm ▸ to_topological_space_top,
this.symm ▸ le_top))
lemma to_topological_space_Inf {s : set (uniform_space α)} :
(Inf s).to_topological_space = (⨅i∈s, @uniform_space.to_topological_space α i) :=
begin
rw [Inf_eq_infi, to_topological_space_infi],
apply congr rfl,
funext x,
exact to_topological_space_infi
end
lemma to_topological_space_inf {u v : uniform_space α} :
(u ⊓ v).to_topological_space = u.to_topological_space ⊓ v.to_topological_space :=
by rw [to_topological_space_Inf, infi_pair]
instance : uniform_space empty := ⊥
instance : uniform_space unit := ⊥
instance : uniform_space bool := ⊥
instance : uniform_space ℕ := ⊥
instance : uniform_space ℤ := ⊥
instance {p : α → Prop} [t : uniform_space α] : uniform_space (subtype p) :=
uniform_space.comap subtype.val t
lemma uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [t : uniform_space α] :
𝓤 (subtype p) = comap (λq:subtype p × subtype p, (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
lemma uniform_continuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [uniform_space α] :
uniform_continuous (subtype.val : {a : α // p a} → α) :=
uniform_continuous_comap
lemma uniform_continuous_subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β]
{f : β → α} (hf : uniform_continuous f) (h : ∀x, p (f x)) :
uniform_continuous (λx, ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → subtype p) :=
uniform_continuous_comap' hf
lemma tendsto_of_uniform_continuous_subtype
[uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α}
(hf : uniform_continuous (λx:s, f x.val)) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) :=
by rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_val_eq α _ s a (mem_of_nhds ha) ha).symm]; exact
tendsto_map' (continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp hf.continuous _)
section prod
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance [u₁ : uniform_space α] [u₂ : uniform_space β] : uniform_space (α × β) :=
uniform_space.of_core_eq
(u₁.comap prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap prod.snd).to_core
prod.topological_space
(calc prod.topological_space = (u₁.comap prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap prod.snd).to_topological_space :
by rw [to_topological_space_inf, to_topological_space_comap, to_topological_space_comap]; refl
... = _ : by rw [uniform_space.to_core_to_topological_space])
theorem uniformity_prod [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] : 𝓤 (α × β) =
(𝓤 α).comap (λp:(α × β) × α × β, (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap (λp:(α × β) × α × β, (p.1.2, p.2.2)) :=
inf_uniformity
lemma uniformity_prod_eq_prod [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
𝓤 (α×β) =
map (λp:(α×α)×(β×β), ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (filter.prod (𝓤 α) (𝓤 β)) :=
have map (λp:(α×α)×(β×β), ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) =
comap (λp:(α×β)×(α×β), ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))),
from funext $ assume f, map_eq_comap_of_inverse
(funext $ assume ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩, rfl) (funext $ assume ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩, rfl),
by rw [this, uniformity_prod, filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap_comp, comap_comap_comp]
lemma mem_map_sets_iff' {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {f : filter α} {m : α → β} {t : set β} :
t ∈ (map m f).sets ↔ (∃s∈f, m '' s ⊆ t) :=
mem_map_sets_iff
lemma mem_uniformity_of_uniform_continuous_invariant [uniform_space α] {s:set (α×α)} {f : α → α → α}
(hf : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, f p.1 p.2)) (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃u∈𝓤 α, ∀a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s :=
begin
rw [uniform_continuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)] at hf,
rcases mem_map_sets_iff'.1 (hf hs) with ⟨t, ht, hts⟩, clear hf,
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩, clear ht,
refine ⟨u, hu, assume a b c hab, hts $ (mem_image _ _ _).2 ⟨⟨⟨a, b⟩, ⟨c, c⟩⟩, huvt ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩⟩,
exact hab,
exact refl_mem_uniformity hv,
refl
end
lemma mem_uniform_prod [t₁ : uniform_space α] [t₂ : uniform_space β] {a : set (α × α)} {b : set (β × β)}
(ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
{p:(α×β)×(α×β) | (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ a ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ b } ∈ (@uniformity (α × β) _) :=
by rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf_sets (preimage_mem_comap ha) (preimage_mem_comap hb)
lemma tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
tendsto (λp:(α×β)×(α×β), (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono (@inf_le_left (uniform_space (α×β)) _ _ _)) map_comap_le
lemma tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
tendsto (λp:(α×β)×(α×β), (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono (@inf_le_right (uniform_space (α×β)) _ _ _)) map_comap_le
lemma uniform_continuous_fst [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] : uniform_continuous (λp:α×β, p.1) :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
lemma uniform_continuous_snd [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] : uniform_continuous (λp:α×β, p.2) :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
variables [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] [uniform_space γ]
lemma uniform_continuous.prod_mk
{f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : uniform_continuous f₁) (h₂ : uniform_continuous f₂) :
uniform_continuous (λa, (f₁ a, f₂ a)) :=
by rw [uniform_continuous, uniformity_prod]; exact
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
lemma uniform_continuous.prod_mk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : uniform_continuous f) (b) :
uniform_continuous (λ a, f (a,b)) :=
h.comp (uniform_continuous_id.prod_mk uniform_continuous_const)
lemma uniform_continuous.prod_mk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : uniform_continuous f) (a) :
uniform_continuous (λ b, f (a,b)) :=
h.comp (uniform_continuous_const.prod_mk uniform_continuous_id)
lemma to_topological_space_prod {α} {β} [u : uniform_space α] [v : uniform_space β] :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space (α × β) prod.uniform_space =
@prod.topological_space α β u.to_topological_space v.to_topological_space := rfl
end prod
section
open uniform_space function
variables [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] [uniform_space γ] [uniform_space δ]
local notation f `∘₂` g := function.bicompr f g
def uniform_continuous₂ (f : α → β → γ) := uniform_continuous (uncurry' f)
lemma uniform_continuous₂_def (f : α → β → γ) : uniform_continuous₂ f ↔ uniform_continuous (uncurry' f) := iff.rfl
lemma uniform_continuous₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) : uniform_continuous₂ (function.curry f) ↔ uniform_continuous f :=
by rw [←uncurry'_curry f] {occs := occurrences.pos [2]} ; refl
lemma uniform_continuous₂.comp {f : α → β → γ} {g : γ → δ}
(hg : uniform_continuous g) (hf : uniform_continuous₂ f) :
uniform_continuous₂ (g ∘₂ f) :=
hg.comp hf
end
lemma to_topological_space_subtype [u : uniform_space α] {p : α → Prop} :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space (subtype p) subtype.uniform_space =
@subtype.topological_space α p u.to_topological_space := rfl
section sum
variables [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β]
open sum
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
def uniform_space.core.sum : uniform_space.core (α ⊕ β) :=
uniform_space.core.mk'
(map (λ p : α × α, (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (λ p : β × β, (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β))
(λ r ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ x, by cases x; [apply refl_mem_uniformity H₁, apply refl_mem_uniformity H₂])
(λ r ⟨H₁, H₂⟩, ⟨symm_le_uniformity H₁, symm_le_uniformity H₂⟩)
(λ r ⟨Hrα, Hrβ⟩, begin
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets Hrα with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩,
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets Hrβ with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩,
refine ⟨_,
⟨mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨tα, htα, subset_union_left _ _⟩,
mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨tβ, htβ, subset_union_right _ _⟩⟩, _⟩,
rintros ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩,
⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩,
{ have A : (a, c) ∈ comp_rel tα tα := ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩,
exact Htα A },
{ have A : (a, c) ∈ comp_rel tβ tβ := ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩,
exact Htβ A }
end)
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage of the diagonal. -/
lemma union_mem_uniformity_sum
{a : set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
((λ p : (α × α), (inl p.1, inl p.2)) '' a ∪ (λ p : (β × β), (inr p.1, inr p.2)) '' b) ∈ (@uniform_space.core.sum α β _ _).uniformity :=
⟨mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨_, ha, subset_union_left _ _⟩, mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨_, hb, subset_union_right _ _⟩⟩
/- To prove that the topology defined by the uniform structure on the disjoint union coincides with
the disjoint union topology, we need two lemmas saying that open sets can be characterized by
the uniform structure -/
lemma uniformity_sum_of_open_aux {s : set (α ⊕ β)} (hs : is_open s) {x : α ⊕ β} (xs : x ∈ s) :
{ p : ((α ⊕ β) × (α ⊕ β)) | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ (@uniform_space.core.sum α β _ _).uniformity :=
begin
cases x,
{ refine mem_sets_of_superset
(union_mem_uniformity_sum (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff.1 (mem_nhds_sets hs.1 xs)) univ_mem_sets)
(union_subset _ _);
rintro _ ⟨⟨_, b⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟩,
exact h rfl },
{ refine mem_sets_of_superset
(union_mem_uniformity_sum univ_mem_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff.1 (mem_nhds_sets hs.2 xs)))
(union_subset _ _);
rintro _ ⟨⟨a, _⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟩,
exact h rfl },
end
lemma open_of_uniformity_sum_aux {s : set (α ⊕ β)}
(hs : ∀x ∈ s, { p : ((α ⊕ β) × (α ⊕ β)) | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ (@uniform_space.core.sum α β _ _).uniformity) :
is_open s :=
begin
split,
{ refine (@is_open_iff_mem_nhds α _ _).2 (λ a ha, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff.2 _),
rcases mem_map_sets_iff.1 (hs _ ha).1 with ⟨t, ht, st⟩,
refine mem_sets_of_superset ht _,
rintro p pt rfl, exact st ⟨_, pt, rfl⟩ rfl },
{ refine (@is_open_iff_mem_nhds β _ _).2 (λ b hb, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff.2 _),
rcases mem_map_sets_iff.1 (hs _ hb).2 with ⟨t, ht, st⟩,
refine mem_sets_of_superset ht _,
rintro p pt rfl, exact st ⟨_, pt, rfl⟩ rfl }
end
/- We can now define the uniform structure on the disjoint union -/
instance sum.uniform_space : uniform_space (α ⊕ β) :=
{ to_core := uniform_space.core.sum,
is_open_uniformity := λ s, ⟨uniformity_sum_of_open_aux, open_of_uniformity_sum_aux⟩ }
lemma sum.uniformity : 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) =
map (λ p : α × α, (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (λ p : β × β, (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β) := rfl
end sum
end constructions
lemma lebesgue_number_lemma {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] {s : set α} {ι} {c : ι → set α}
(hs : compact s) (hc₁ : ∀ i, is_open (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, c i) :
∃ n ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, {y | (x, y) ∈ n} ⊆ c i :=
begin
let u := λ n, {x | ∃ i (m ∈ 𝓤 α), {y | (x, y) ∈ comp_rel m n} ⊆ c i},
have hu₁ : ∀ n ∈ 𝓤 α, is_open (u n),
{ refine λ n hn, is_open_uniformity.2 _,
rintro x ⟨i, m, hm, h⟩,
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hm with ⟨m', hm', mm'⟩,
apply (𝓤 α).sets_of_superset hm',
rintros ⟨x, y⟩ hp rfl,
refine ⟨i, m', hm', λ z hz, h (monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_const mm' _)⟩,
dsimp at hz ⊢, rw comp_rel_assoc,
exact ⟨y, hp, hz⟩ },
have hu₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ n ∈ 𝓤 α, u n,
{ intros x hx,
rcases mem_Union.1 (hc₂ hx) with ⟨i, h⟩,
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets (is_open_uniformity.1 (hc₁ i) x h) with ⟨m', hm', mm'⟩,
exact mem_bUnion hm' ⟨i, _, hm', λ y hy, mm' hy rfl⟩ },
rcases compact_elim_finite_subcover_image hs hu₁ hu₂ with ⟨b, bu, b_fin, b_cover⟩,
refine ⟨_, Inter_mem_sets b_fin bu, λ x hx, _⟩,
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 (b_cover hx) with ⟨n, bn, i, m, hm, h⟩,
refine ⟨i, λ y hy, h _⟩,
exact prod_mk_mem_comp_rel (refl_mem_uniformity hm) (bInter_subset_of_mem bn hy)
end
lemma lebesgue_number_lemma_sUnion {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] {s : set α} {c : set (set α)}
(hs : compact s) (hc₁ : ∀ t ∈ c, is_open t) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃₀ c) :
∃ n ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ c, ∀ y, (x, y) ∈ n → y ∈ t :=
by rw sUnion_eq_Union at hc₂;
simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma hs (by simpa) hc₂
|
4efc87b2fb79a0d29ad1d10c540b9b35e9b0c425 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/tt1.lean | 2ded6fdacccfb12a765ec0a90d08d17d29da14e2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 135 | lean | import data.prod data.num logic.quantifiers
open prod nat
check (true, false, (10:nat))
-- definition a f := f
check fun x, x ∧ x
|
d92fadf5bad80e869cea68f5f0dc82c06f25c7ac | 4e3bf8e2b29061457a887ac8889e88fa5aa0e34c | /lean/love08_operational_semantics_homework_sheet.lean | c17963d731f01251b930a33824a9843dfce3eca4 | [] | no_license | mukeshtiwari/logical_verification_2019 | 9f964c067a71f65eb8884743273fbeef99e6503d | 16f62717f55ed5b7b87e03ae0134791a9bef9b9a | refs/heads/master | 1,619,158,844,208 | 1,585,139,500,000 | 1,585,139,500,000 | 249,906,380 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,585,118,728,000 | 1,585,118,727,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,350 | lean | /- LoVe Homework 8: Operational Semantics -/
import .lovelib
namespace LoVe
/- Question 1: Semantics of Regular Expressions
Regular expression are a very popular tool for software development. Often, when
textual input needs to be analyzed it is matched against a regular expression.
In this homework, we define the syntax of regular expressions and what it means
that a regular expression matches a string.
We define `regex` to represent the following grammar:
R ::= c — `char`: accepts one character `c`
| ∅ — `nothing`: accepts nothing
| ε — `empty`: accepts the empty string
| R ⬝ R — `concat`: accepts the concatenation of two regexes
| R + R — `alt`: accepts either of two regexes
| R* — `star`: accept arbitrary many repetitions of a regex
Notice the rough correspondence with a WHILE language:
`char` ~ assignment
`empty` ~ `skip`
`concat` ~ sequential composition
`alt` ~ conditional statement
`star` ~ while loop -/
inductive regex : Type
| char : char → regex
| nothing : regex
| empty : regex
| concat : regex → regex → regex
| alt : regex → regex → regex
| star : regex → regex
/- The `accept r s` predicate indicates that the regular expression `r` accepts
the string `s`. -/
inductive accept : regex → list char → Prop
/- accept one character -/
| char (c : char) :
accept (regex.char c) [c]
/- accept the empty string -/
| empty :
accept regex.empty []
/- accept two concatenated regexes -/
| concat {r₁ r₂ : regex} (s₁ s₂ : list char) (h₁ : accept r₁ s₁)
(h₂ : accept r₂ s₂) :
accept (regex.concat r₁ r₂) (s₁ ++ s₂)
/- accept the left alternative -/
| alt_left {r₁ r₂ : regex} (s : list char) (h : accept r₁ s) :
accept (regex.alt r₁ r₂) s
/- accept the right alternative -/
| alt_right {r₁ r₂ : regex} (s : list char) (h : accept r₂ s) :
accept (regex.alt r₁ r₂) s
/- accepts the empty string; this is the base case of `R*` -/
| star_base {r : regex} : accept (regex.star r) []
/- accepts `R` followed again by `R*`; this is the induction step of `R*` -/
| star_step {r : regex} (s s' : list char) (h₁ : accept r s)
(h₂ : accept (regex.star r) s') :
accept (regex.star r) (s ++ s')
/- 1.1. Explain why there is no rule for `nothing`. -/
-- enter your answer here
/- 1.2. Prove the following inversion rules.
These proofs are very similar to the inversion rules in the lecture and the
exercise. -/
@[simp] lemma accept_char {s : list char} {c : char} :
accept (regex.char c) s ↔ s = [c] :=
sorry
@[simp] lemma accept_nothing {s : list char} :
¬ accept regex.nothing s :=
sorry
@[simp] lemma accept_empty {s : list char} :
accept regex.empty s ↔ s = [] :=
sorry
@[simp] lemma accept_concat {s : list char} {r₁ r₂ : regex} :
accept (regex.concat r₁ r₂) s
↔ (∃s₁ s₂, accept r₁ s₁ ∧ accept r₂ s₂ ∧ s = s₁ ++ s₂) :=
sorry
@[simp] lemma accept_alt {s : list char} {r₁ r₂ : regex} :
accept (regex.alt r₁ r₂) s ↔ (accept r₁ s ∨ accept r₂ s) :=
sorry
lemma accept_star {s : list char} {r : regex} :
accept (regex.star r) s ↔
(s = [] ∨ (∃s₁ s₂, accept r s₁ ∧ accept (regex.star r) s₂ ∧ s = s₁ ++ s₂)) :=
sorry
end LoVe
|
9bd172b0a548c7c88700a23c1e549ab9c76b59f4 | dc253be9829b840f15d96d986e0c13520b085033 | /algebra/quotient_group.hlean | 45c0e8ea5f486664765f19374dd9b878ab0c54d0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | cmu-phil/Spectral | 4ce68e5c1ef2a812ffda5260e9f09f41b85ae0ea | 3b078f5f1de251637decf04bd3fc8aa01930a6b3 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,119,195,535 | 1,684,169,772,000 | 1,684,169,772,000 | 46,450,197 | 42 | 13 | null | 1,505,516,767,000 | 1,447,883,921,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 30,619 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Egbert Rijke, Jeremy Avigad
Constructions with groups
-/
import hit.set_quotient .subgroup ..move_to_lib types.equiv
open eq algebra is_trunc set_quotient relation sigma sigma.ops prod trunc function equiv is_equiv
open property
namespace group
variables {G G' : Group}
(H : property G) [is_subgroup G H]
(N : property G) [is_normal_subgroup G N]
{g g' h h' k : G}
(N' : property G') [is_normal_subgroup G' N']
variables {A B : AbGroup}
/- Quotient Group -/
definition homotopy_of_homomorphism_eq {f g : G →g G'}(p : f = g) : f ~ g :=
λx : G , ap010 group_fun p x
definition quotient_rel [constructor] (g h : G) : Prop := g * h⁻¹ ∈ N
variable {N}
-- We prove that quotient_rel is an equivalence relation
theorem quotient_rel_refl (g : G) : quotient_rel N g g :=
transport (λx, N x) !mul.right_inv⁻¹ (subgroup_one_mem N)
theorem quotient_rel_symm (r : quotient_rel N g h) : quotient_rel N h g :=
transport (λx, N x) (!mul_inv ⬝ ap (λx, x * _) !inv_inv)
begin apply subgroup_inv_mem r end
theorem quotient_rel_trans (r : quotient_rel N g h) (s : quotient_rel N h k)
: quotient_rel N g k :=
have H1 : N ((g * h⁻¹) * (h * k⁻¹)), from subgroup_mul_mem r s,
have H2 : (g * h⁻¹) * (h * k⁻¹) = g * k⁻¹, from calc
(g * h⁻¹) * (h * k⁻¹) = ((g * h⁻¹) * h) * k⁻¹ : by rewrite [mul.assoc (g * h⁻¹)]
... = g * k⁻¹ : by rewrite inv_mul_cancel_right,
show N (g * k⁻¹), by rewrite [-H2]; exact H1
theorem is_equivalence_quotient_rel : is_equivalence (quotient_rel N) :=
is_equivalence.mk quotient_rel_refl
(λg h, quotient_rel_symm)
(λg h k, quotient_rel_trans)
-- We prove that quotient_rel respects inverses and multiplication, so
-- it is a congruence relation
theorem quotient_rel_resp_inv (r : quotient_rel N g h) : quotient_rel N g⁻¹ h⁻¹ :=
have H1 : g⁻¹ * (h * g⁻¹) * g ∈ N, from
is_normal_subgroup' g (quotient_rel_symm r),
have H2 : g⁻¹ * (h * g⁻¹) * g = g⁻¹ * h⁻¹⁻¹, from calc
g⁻¹ * (h * g⁻¹) * g = g⁻¹ * h * g⁻¹ * g : by rewrite -mul.assoc
... = g⁻¹ * h : inv_mul_cancel_right
... = g⁻¹ * h⁻¹⁻¹ : by rewrite algebra.inv_inv,
show g⁻¹ * h⁻¹⁻¹ ∈ N, by rewrite [-H2]; exact H1
theorem quotient_rel_resp_mul (r : quotient_rel N g h) (r' : quotient_rel N g' h')
: quotient_rel N (g * g') (h * h') :=
have H1 : g * ((g' * h'⁻¹) * h⁻¹) ∈ N, from
normal_subgroup_insert r' r,
have H2 : g * ((g' * h'⁻¹) * h⁻¹) = (g * g') * (h * h')⁻¹, from calc
g * ((g' * h'⁻¹) * h⁻¹) = g * (g' * (h'⁻¹ * h⁻¹)) : by rewrite [mul.assoc]
... = (g * g') * (h'⁻¹ * h⁻¹) : mul.assoc
... = (g * g') * (h * h')⁻¹ : by rewrite [mul_inv],
show N ((g * g') * (h * h')⁻¹), from transport (λx, N x) H2 H1
local attribute is_equivalence_quotient_rel [instance]
variable (N)
definition qg : Type := set_quotient (quotient_rel N)
variable {N}
local attribute qg [reducible]
definition quotient_one [constructor] : qg N := class_of one
definition quotient_inv [unfold 3] : qg N → qg N :=
quotient_unary_map has_inv.inv (λg g' r, quotient_rel_resp_inv r)
definition quotient_mul [unfold 3 4] : qg N → qg N → qg N :=
quotient_binary_map has_mul.mul (λg g' r h h' r', quotient_rel_resp_mul r r')
section
local notation 1 := quotient_one
local postfix ⁻¹ := quotient_inv
local infix * := quotient_mul
theorem quotient_mul_assoc (g₁ g₂ g₃ : qg N) : g₁ * g₂ * g₃ = g₁ * (g₂ * g₃) :=
begin
refine set_quotient.rec_prop _ g₁,
refine set_quotient.rec_prop _ g₂,
refine set_quotient.rec_prop _ g₃,
clear g₁ g₂ g₃, intro g₁ g₂ g₃,
exact ap class_of !mul.assoc
end
theorem quotient_one_mul (g : qg N) : 1 * g = g :=
begin
refine set_quotient.rec_prop _ g, clear g, intro g,
exact ap class_of !one_mul
end
theorem quotient_mul_one (g : qg N) : g * 1 = g :=
begin
refine set_quotient.rec_prop _ g, clear g, intro g,
exact ap class_of !mul_one
end
theorem quotient_mul_left_inv (g : qg N) : g⁻¹ * g = 1 :=
begin
refine set_quotient.rec_prop _ g, clear g, intro g,
exact ap class_of !mul.left_inv
end
theorem quotient_mul_comm {G : AbGroup} {N : property G} [is_normal_subgroup G N] (g h : qg N)
: g * h = h * g :=
begin
refine set_quotient.rec_prop _ g, clear g, intro g,
refine set_quotient.rec_prop _ h, clear h, intro h,
apply ap class_of, esimp, apply mul.comm
end
end
variable (N)
definition group_qg [constructor] : group (qg N) :=
group.mk _ quotient_mul quotient_mul_assoc quotient_one quotient_one_mul quotient_mul_one
quotient_inv quotient_mul_left_inv
definition quotient_group [constructor] : Group :=
Group.mk _ (group_qg N)
definition ab_group_qg [constructor] {G : AbGroup} (N : property G) [is_normal_subgroup G N]
: ab_group (qg N) :=
⦃ab_group, group_qg N, mul_comm := quotient_mul_comm⦄
definition quotient_ab_group [constructor] {G : AbGroup} (N : property G) [is_subgroup G N]
: AbGroup :=
AbGroup.mk _ (@ab_group_qg G N (is_normal_subgroup_ab _))
definition qg_map [constructor] : G →g quotient_group N :=
homomorphism.mk class_of (λ g h, idp)
definition ab_qg_map {G : AbGroup} (N : property G) [is_subgroup G N] : G →g quotient_ab_group N :=
@qg_map _ N (is_normal_subgroup_ab _)
definition is_surjective_qg_map {A : Group} (N : property A) [is_normal_subgroup A N] :
is_surjective (qg_map N) :=
begin
intro x, induction x,
fapply image.mk,
exact a, reflexivity,
apply is_prop.elimo
end
definition is_surjective_ab_qg_map {A : AbGroup} (N : property A) [is_subgroup A N] :
is_surjective (ab_qg_map N) :=
@is_surjective_qg_map _ _ _
namespace quotient
notation `⟦`:max a `⟧`:0 := qg_map _ a
end quotient
open quotient
variables {N N'}
definition qg_map_eq_one {A : Group} {K : property A} [is_normal_subgroup A K] (g : A)
(H : g ∈ K) : qg_map K g = 1 :=
begin
apply set_quotient.eq_of_rel,
have e : g * 1⁻¹ = g,
from calc
g * 1⁻¹ = g * 1 : one_inv
... = g : mul_one,
exact transport (λx, K x) e⁻¹ H
end
definition ab_qg_map_eq_one {A : AbGroup} {K : property A} [is_subgroup A K] (g : A) (H : g ∈ K) :
ab_qg_map K g = 1 :=
@qg_map_eq_one _ _ _ g H
--- there should be a smarter way to do this!! Please have a look, Floris.
definition rel_of_qg_map_eq_one (g : G) (H : qg_map N g = 1) : g ∈ N :=
begin
have e : (g * 1⁻¹ = g),
from calc
g * 1⁻¹ = g * 1 : one_inv
... = g : mul_one,
rewrite (inverse e),
apply rel_of_eq _ H
end
definition rel_of_ab_qg_map_eq_one {K : property A} [is_subgroup A K] (a :A) (H : ab_qg_map K a = 1) : a ∈ K :=
begin
have e : (a * 1⁻¹ = a),
from calc
a * 1⁻¹ = a * 1 : one_inv
... = a : mul_one,
rewrite (inverse e),
have is_normal_subgroup A K, from is_normal_subgroup_ab _,
apply rel_of_eq (quotient_rel K) H
end
definition quotient_group_elim_fun [unfold 6] (f : G →g G') (H : Π⦃g⦄, N g → f g = 1)
(g : quotient_group N) : G' :=
begin
refine set_quotient.elim f _ g,
intro g h K,
apply eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one,
have e : f (g * h⁻¹) = f g * (f h)⁻¹,
from calc
f (g * h⁻¹) = f g * (f h⁻¹) : to_respect_mul
... = f g * (f h)⁻¹ : to_respect_inv,
rewrite (inverse e),
apply H, exact K
end
definition quotient_group_elim [constructor] (f : G →g G') (H : Π⦃g⦄, g ∈ N → f g = 1) : quotient_group N →g G' :=
begin
fapply homomorphism.mk,
-- define function
{ exact quotient_group_elim_fun f H },
{ intro g h, induction g using set_quotient.rec_prop with g,
induction h using set_quotient.rec_prop with h,
krewrite (inverse (to_respect_mul (qg_map N) g h)),
unfold qg_map, esimp, exact to_respect_mul f g h }
end
example {K : property A} [is_subgroup A K] :
quotient_ab_group K = @quotient_group A K (is_normal_subgroup_ab _) := rfl
definition quotient_ab_group_elim [constructor] {K : property A} [is_subgroup A K] (f : A →g B)
(H : Π⦃g⦄, g ∈ K → f g = 1) : quotient_ab_group K →g B :=
@quotient_group_elim A B K (is_normal_subgroup_ab _) f H
definition quotient_group_compute (f : G →g G') (H : Π⦃g⦄, N g → f g = 1) (g : G) :
quotient_group_elim f H (qg_map N g) = f g :=
begin
reflexivity
end
definition gelim_unique (f : G →g G') (H : Π⦃g⦄, g ∈ N → f g = 1) (k : quotient_group N →g G')
: ( k ∘g qg_map N ~ f ) → k ~ quotient_group_elim f H :=
begin
intro K cg, induction cg using set_quotient.rec_prop with g,
exact K g
end
definition ab_gelim_unique {K : property A} [is_subgroup A K] (f : A →g B) (H : Π (a :A), a ∈ K → f a = 1) (k : quotient_ab_group K →g B)
: ( k ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ f) → k ~ quotient_ab_group_elim f H :=
--@quotient_group_elim A B K (is_normal_subgroup_ab _) f H :=
@gelim_unique _ _ K (is_normal_subgroup_ab _) f H _
definition qg_universal_property (f : G →g G') (H : Π⦃g⦄, N g → f g = 1) :
is_contr (Σ(g : quotient_group N →g G'), g ∘ qg_map N ~ f) :=
begin
fapply is_contr.mk,
-- give center of contraction
{ fapply sigma.mk, exact quotient_group_elim f H, exact quotient_group_compute f H },
-- give contraction
{ intro pair, induction pair with g p, fapply sigma_eq,
{esimp, apply homomorphism_eq, symmetry, exact gelim_unique f H g p},
{fapply is_prop.elimo} }
end
definition ab_qg_universal_property {K : property A} [is_subgroup A K] (f : A →g B) (H : Π (a :A), K a → f a = 1) :
is_contr ((Σ(g : quotient_ab_group K →g B), g ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ f) ) :=
begin
fapply @qg_universal_property _ _ K (is_normal_subgroup_ab _),
exact H
end
definition quotient_group_functor_contr {K L : property A} [is_subgroup A K] [is_subgroup A L]
(H : Π (a : A), K a → L a) :
is_contr ((Σ(g : quotient_ab_group K →g quotient_ab_group L), g ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map L) ) :=
begin
fapply ab_qg_universal_property,
intro a p,
fapply ab_qg_map_eq_one,
exact H a p
end
definition quotient_group_functor_id {K : property A} [is_subgroup A K] (H : Π (a : A), K a → K a) :
center' (@quotient_group_functor_contr _ K K _ _ H) = ⟨gid (quotient_ab_group K), λ x, rfl⟩ :=
begin
note p := @quotient_group_functor_contr _ K K _ _ H,
fapply eq_of_is_contr,
end
section quotient_group_iso_ua
set_option pp.universes true
definition subgroup_rel_eq' {K L : property A} [HK : is_subgroup A K] [HL : is_subgroup A L] (htpy : Π (a : A), K a ≃ L a) : K = L :=
begin
induction HK with Rone Rmul Rinv, induction HL with Rone' Rmul' Rinv', esimp at *,
assert q : K = L,
begin
fapply eq_of_homotopy,
intro a,
fapply tua,
exact htpy a,
end,
induction q,
assert q : Rone = Rone',
begin
fapply is_prop.elim,
end,
induction q,
assert q2 : @Rmul = @Rmul',
begin
fapply is_prop.elim,
end,
induction q2,
assert q : @Rinv = @Rinv',
begin
fapply is_prop.elim,
end,
induction q,
reflexivity
end
definition subgroup_rel_eq {K L : property A} [is_subgroup A K] [is_subgroup A L] (K_in_L : Π (a : A), a ∈ K → a ∈ L) (L_in_K : Π (a : A), a ∈ L → a ∈ K) : K = L :=
begin
have htpy : Π (a : A), K a ≃ L a,
begin
intro a,
exact @equiv_of_is_prop (a ∈ K) (a ∈ L) (K_in_L a) (L_in_K a) _ _,
end,
exact subgroup_rel_eq' htpy,
end
definition eq_of_ab_qg_group' {K L : property A} [HK : is_subgroup A K] [HL : is_subgroup A L] (p : K = L) : quotient_ab_group K = quotient_ab_group L :=
begin
revert HK, revert HL, induction p, intros,
have HK = HL, begin apply @is_prop.elim _ _ HK HL end,
rewrite this
end
definition iso_of_eq {B : AbGroup} (p : A = B) : A ≃g B :=
begin
induction p, fapply isomorphism.mk, exact gid A, fapply adjointify, exact id, intro a, reflexivity, intro a, reflexivity
end
definition iso_of_ab_qg_group' {K L : property A} [is_subgroup A K] [is_subgroup A L] (p : K = L) : quotient_ab_group K ≃g quotient_ab_group L :=
iso_of_eq (eq_of_ab_qg_group' p)
/-
definition htpy_of_ab_qg_group' {K L : property A} [HK : is_subgroup A K] [HL : is_subgroup A L] (p : K = L) : (iso_of_ab_qg_group' p) ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map L :=
begin
revert HK, revert HL, induction p, intros HK HL, unfold iso_of_ab_qg_group', unfold ab_qg_map
-- have HK = HL, begin apply @is_prop.elim _ _ HK HL end,
-- rewrite this
-- induction p, reflexivity
end
-/
definition eq_of_ab_qg_group {K L : property A} [is_subgroup A K] [is_subgroup A L] (K_in_L : Π (a : A), K a → L a) (L_in_K : Π (a : A), L a → K a) : quotient_ab_group K = quotient_ab_group L :=
eq_of_ab_qg_group' (subgroup_rel_eq K_in_L L_in_K)
definition iso_of_ab_qg_group {K L : property A} [is_subgroup A K] [is_subgroup A L] (K_in_L : Π (a : A), K a → L a) (L_in_K : Π (a : A), L a → K a) : quotient_ab_group K ≃g quotient_ab_group L :=
iso_of_eq (eq_of_ab_qg_group K_in_L L_in_K)
/-
definition htpy_of_ab_qg_group {K L : property A} [is_subgroup A K] [is_subgroup A L] (K_in_L : Π (a : A), K a → L a) (L_in_K : Π (a : A), L a → K a) : iso_of_ab_qg_group K_in_L L_in_K ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map L :=
begin
fapply htpy_of_ab_qg_group'
end
-/
end quotient_group_iso_ua
section quotient_group_iso
variables {K L : property A} [is_subgroup A K] [is_subgroup A L] (H1 : Π (a : A), K a → L a) (H2 : Π (a : A), L a → K a)
include H1
include H2
definition quotient_group_iso_contr_KL_map :
quotient_ab_group K →g quotient_ab_group L :=
pr1 (center' (quotient_group_functor_contr H1))
definition quotient_group_iso_contr_KL_triangle :
quotient_group_iso_contr_KL_map H1 H2 ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map L :=
pr2 (center' (quotient_group_functor_contr H1))
definition quotient_group_iso_contr_KK :
is_contr (Σ (g : quotient_ab_group K →g quotient_ab_group K), g ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map K) :=
@quotient_group_functor_contr A K K _ _ (λ a, H2 a ∘ H1 a)
definition quotient_group_iso_contr_LK :
quotient_ab_group L →g quotient_ab_group K :=
pr1 (center' (@quotient_group_functor_contr A L K _ _ H2))
definition quotient_group_iso_contr_LL :
quotient_ab_group L →g quotient_ab_group L :=
pr1 (center' (@quotient_group_functor_contr A L L _ _ (λ a, H1 a ∘ H2 a)))
/-
definition quotient_group_iso : quotient_ab_group K ≃g quotient_ab_group L :=
begin
fapply isomorphism.mk,
exact pr1 (center' (quotient_group_iso_contr_KL H1 H2)),
fapply adjointify,
exact quotient_group_iso_contr_LK H1 H2,
intro x,
induction x, reflexivity,
end
-/
definition quotient_group_iso_contr_aux :
is_contr (Σ(gh : Σ (g : quotient_ab_group K →g quotient_ab_group L), g ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map L), is_equiv (group_fun (pr1 gh))) :=
begin
fapply is_trunc_sigma,
exact quotient_group_functor_contr H1,
intro a, induction a with g h,
fapply is_contr_of_inhabited_prop,
fapply adjointify,
rexact group_fun (pr1 (center' (@quotient_group_functor_contr A L K _ _ H2))),
note htpy := homotopy_of_eq (ap group_fun (ap sigma.pr1 (@quotient_group_functor_id _ L _ (λ a, (H1 a) ∘ (H2 a))))),
have KK : is_contr ((Σ(g' : quotient_ab_group K →g quotient_ab_group K), g' ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map K) ), from
quotient_group_functor_contr (λ a, (H2 a) ∘ (H1 a)),
-- have KK_path : ⟨g, h⟩ = ⟨id, λ a, refl (ab_qg_map K a)⟩, from eq_of_is_contr ⟨g, h⟩ ⟨id, λ a, refl (ab_qg_map K a)⟩,
repeat exact sorry
end
/-
definition quotient_group_iso_contr {K L : property A} [is_subgroup A K] [is_subgroup A L] (H1 : Π (a : A), K a → L a) (H2 : Π (a : A), L a → K a) :
is_contr (Σ (g : quotient_ab_group K ≃g quotient_ab_group L), g ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map L) :=
begin
refine @is_trunc_equiv_closed (Σ(gh : Σ (g : quotient_ab_group K →g quotient_ab_group L), g ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map L), is_equiv (group_fun (pr1 gh))) (Σ (g : quotient_ab_group K ≃g quotient_ab_group L), g ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map L) -2 _ (quotient_group_iso_contr_aux H1 H2),
exact calc
(Σ gh, is_equiv (group_fun gh.1)) ≃ Σ (g : quotient_ab_group K →g quotient_ab_group L) (h : g ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map L), is_equiv (group_fun g) : by exact (sigma_assoc_equiv (λ gh, is_equiv (group_fun gh.1)))⁻¹
... ≃ (Σ (g : quotient_ab_group K ≃g quotient_ab_group L), g ∘g ab_qg_map K ~ ab_qg_map L) : _
end
-/
end quotient_group_iso
definition quotient_group_functor [constructor] (φ : G →g G') (h : Πg, g ∈ N → φ g ∈ N') :
quotient_group N →g quotient_group N' :=
begin
apply quotient_group_elim (qg_map N' ∘g φ),
intro g Ng, esimp,
refine qg_map_eq_one (φ g) (h g Ng)
end
------------------------------------------------
-- FIRST ISOMORPHISM THEOREM
------------------------------------------------
definition kernel_quotient_extension {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B) : quotient_ab_group (kernel f) →g B :=
begin
apply quotient_ab_group_elim f,
intro a, intro p, exact p
end
definition kernel_quotient_extension_triangle {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B) :
kernel_quotient_extension f ∘ ab_qg_map (kernel f) ~ f :=
begin
intro a, reflexivity
end
definition is_embedding_kernel_quotient_extension {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B) :
is_embedding (kernel_quotient_extension f) :=
begin
fapply is_embedding_of_is_mul_hom,
intro x,
note H := is_surjective_ab_qg_map (kernel f) x,
induction H, induction p,
intro q,
apply ab_qg_map_eq_one,
refine _ ⬝ q,
symmetry,
rexact kernel_quotient_extension_triangle f a
end
definition ab_group_quotient_homomorphism (A B : AbGroup)(K : property A)(L : property B) [is_subgroup A K] [is_subgroup B L] (f : A →g B)
(p : Π(a:A), a ∈ K → f a ∈ L) : quotient_ab_group K →g quotient_ab_group L :=
begin
fapply @quotient_group_elim,
exact (ab_qg_map L) ∘g f,
intro a,
intro k,
exact @ab_qg_map_eq_one B L _ (f a) (p a k),
end
definition ab_group_kernel_factor {A B C: AbGroup} (f : A →g B)(g : A →g C){i : C →g B}(H : f = i ∘g g )
: kernel g ⊆ kernel f :=
begin
intro a,
intro p,
exact calc
f a = i (g a) : homotopy_of_eq (ap group_fun H) a
... = i 1 : ap i p
... = 1 : respect_one i
end
definition ab_group_triv_kernel_factor {A B C: AbGroup} (f : A →g B)(g : A →g C){i : C →g B}(H : f = i ∘g g ) :
kernel f ⊆ '{1} → kernel g ⊆ '{1} :=
λ p, subproperty.trans (ab_group_kernel_factor f g H) p
definition is_embedding_of_kernel_subproperty_one {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B) :
kernel f ⊆ '{1} → is_embedding f :=
λ p, is_embedding_of_is_mul_hom _
(take x, assume h : f x = 1,
show x = 1, from eq_of_mem_singleton (p _ h))
definition kernel_subproperty_one {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B) :
is_embedding f → kernel f ⊆ '{1} :=
λ h x hx,
have x = 1, from eq_one_of_is_mul_hom hx,
show x ∈ '{1}, from mem_singleton_of_eq this
definition ab_group_kernel_equivalent {A B : AbGroup} (C : AbGroup) (f : A →g B)(g : A →g C)(i : C →g B)(H : f = i ∘g g )(K : is_embedding i)
: Π a:A, a ∈ kernel g ↔ a ∈ kernel f :=
exteq_of_subproperty_of_subproperty
(show kernel g ⊆ kernel f, from ab_group_kernel_factor f g H)
(show kernel f ⊆ kernel g, from
take a,
suppose f a = 1,
have i (g a) = i 1, from calc
i (g a) = f a : (homotopy_of_eq (ap group_fun H) a)⁻¹
... = 1 : this
... = i 1 : (respect_one i)⁻¹,
is_injective_of_is_embedding this)
definition ab_group_kernel_image_lift (A B : AbGroup) (f : A →g B)
: Π a : A, a ∈ kernel (image_lift f) ↔ a ∈ kernel f :=
begin
fapply ab_group_kernel_equivalent (ab_Image f) (f) (image_lift(f)) (image_incl(f)),
exact image_factor f,
exact is_embedding_of_is_injective (image_incl_injective(f)),
end
definition ab_group_kernel_quotient_to_image {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B)
: quotient_ab_group (kernel f) →g ab_Image (f) :=
begin
fapply quotient_ab_group_elim (image_lift f), intro a, intro p,
apply iff.mpr (ab_group_kernel_image_lift _ _ f a) p
end
definition ab_group_kernel_quotient_to_image_domain_triangle {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B)
: ab_group_kernel_quotient_to_image (f) ∘g ab_qg_map (kernel f) ~ image_lift(f) :=
begin
intros a,
esimp,
end
definition ab_group_kernel_quotient_to_image_codomain_triangle {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B)
: image_incl f ∘g ab_group_kernel_quotient_to_image f ~ kernel_quotient_extension f :=
begin
intro x,
induction x,
reflexivity,
fapply is_prop.elimo
end
-- set_option pp.all true
-- print algebra._trans_of_Group_of_AbGroup_2
definition is_surjective_kernel_quotient_to_image {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B)
: is_surjective (ab_group_kernel_quotient_to_image f) :=
begin
refine is_surjective_factor (ab_qg_map (kernel f)) (image_lift f) _ _,
apply @quotient_group_compute _ _ _ (@is_normal_subgroup_ab _ (kernel f) _),
exact is_surjective_image_lift f
end
definition is_embedding_kernel_quotient_to_image {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B)
: is_embedding (ab_group_kernel_quotient_to_image f) :=
begin
fapply is_embedding_factor (image_incl f) (kernel_quotient_extension f),
exact ab_group_kernel_quotient_to_image_codomain_triangle f,
exact is_embedding_kernel_quotient_extension f
end
definition ab_group_first_iso_thm {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B)
: quotient_ab_group (kernel f) ≃g ab_Image f :=
begin
fapply isomorphism.mk,
exact ab_group_kernel_quotient_to_image f,
fapply is_equiv_of_is_surjective_of_is_embedding,
exact is_embedding_kernel_quotient_to_image f,
exact is_surjective_kernel_quotient_to_image f
end
definition codomain_surjection_is_quotient {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B)( H : is_surjective f)
: quotient_ab_group (kernel f) ≃g B :=
begin
exact (ab_group_first_iso_thm f) ⬝g (iso_surjection_ab_image_incl f H)
end
definition codomain_surjection_is_quotient_triangle {A B : AbGroup} (f : A →g B)( H : is_surjective f)
: codomain_surjection_is_quotient (f)(H) ∘g ab_qg_map (kernel f) ~ f :=
begin
intro a,
esimp
end
-- print iff.mpr
/- set generating normal subgroup -/
section
parameters {A₁ : AbGroup} (S : A₁ → Prop)
variable {A₂ : AbGroup}
inductive generating_relation' : A₁ → Type :=
| rincl : Π{g}, S g → generating_relation' g
| rmul : Π{g h}, generating_relation' g → generating_relation' h → generating_relation' (g * h)
| rinv : Π{g}, generating_relation' g → generating_relation' g⁻¹
| rone : generating_relation' 1
open generating_relation'
definition generating_relation (g : A₁) : Prop := ∥ generating_relation' g ∥
local abbreviation R := generating_relation
definition gr_one : R 1 := tr (rone S)
definition gr_inv (g : A₁) : R g → R g⁻¹ :=
trunc_functor -1 rinv
definition gr_mul (g h : A₁) : R g → R h → R (g * h) :=
trunc_functor2 rmul
definition normal_generating_relation [instance] : is_subgroup A₁ generating_relation :=
⦃ is_subgroup,
one_mem := gr_one,
inv_mem := gr_inv,
mul_mem := gr_mul⦄
parameter (A₁)
definition quotient_ab_group_gen : AbGroup := quotient_ab_group generating_relation
definition gqg_map [constructor] : A₁ →g quotient_ab_group_gen :=
ab_qg_map _
parameter {A₁}
definition gqg_eq_of_rel {g h : A₁} (H : S (g * h⁻¹)) : gqg_map g = gqg_map h :=
eq_of_rel (tr (rincl H))
-- this one might work if the previous one doesn't (maybe make this the default one?)
definition gqg_eq_of_rel' {g h : A₁} (H : S (g * h⁻¹)) : class_of g = class_of h :> quotient_ab_group_gen :=
gqg_eq_of_rel H
definition gqg_elim [constructor] (f : A₁ →g A₂) (H : Π⦃g⦄, S g → f g = 1)
: quotient_ab_group_gen →g A₂ :=
begin
apply quotient_ab_group_elim f,
intro g r, induction r with r,
induction r with g s g h r r' IH1 IH2 g r IH,
{ exact H s },
{ exact !respect_mul ⬝ ap011 mul IH1 IH2 ⬝ !one_mul },
{ exact !respect_inv ⬝ ap inv IH ⬝ !one_inv },
{ apply respect_one }
end
definition gqg_elim_compute (f : A₁ →g A₂) (H : Π⦃g⦄, S g → f g = 1)
: gqg_elim f H ∘ gqg_map ~ f :=
begin
intro g, reflexivity
end
definition gqg_elim_unique (f : A₁ →g A₂) (H : Π⦃g⦄, S g → f g = 1)
(k : quotient_ab_group_gen →g A₂) : ( k ∘g gqg_map ~ f ) → k ~ gqg_elim f H :=
!ab_gelim_unique
end
end group
namespace group
variables {G H K : Group} {R : property G} [is_normal_subgroup G R]
{S : property H} [is_normal_subgroup H S]
{T : property K} [is_normal_subgroup K T]
theorem quotient_group_functor_compose (ψ : H →g K) (φ : G →g H)
(hψ : Πg, g ∈ S → ψ g ∈ T) (hφ : Πg, g ∈ R → φ g ∈ S) :
quotient_group_functor ψ hψ ∘g quotient_group_functor φ hφ ~
quotient_group_functor (ψ ∘g φ) (λg, proof hψ (φ g) qed ∘ hφ g) :=
begin
intro g, induction g using set_quotient.rec_prop with g hg, reflexivity
end
definition quotient_group_functor_gid :
quotient_group_functor (gid G) (λg, id) ~ gid (quotient_group R) :=
begin
intro g, induction g using set_quotient.rec_prop with g hg, reflexivity
end
definition quotient_group_functor_homotopy {ψ φ : G →g H} (hψ : Πg, R g → S (ψ g))
(hφ : Πg, g ∈ R → φ g ∈ S) (p : φ ~ ψ) :
quotient_group_functor φ hφ ~ quotient_group_functor ψ hψ :=
begin
intro g, induction g using set_quotient.rec_prop with g hg,
exact ap set_quotient.class_of (p g)
end
definition quotient_group_isomorphism_quotient_group [constructor] (φ : G ≃g H)
(h : Πg, g ∈ R ↔ φ g ∈ S) : quotient_group R ≃g quotient_group S :=
begin
refine isomorphism.MK (quotient_group_functor φ (λg, iff.mp (h g)))
(quotient_group_functor φ⁻¹ᵍ (λg gS, iff.mpr (h _) (transport S (right_inv φ g)⁻¹ gS))) _ _,
{ refine quotient_group_functor_compose _ _ _ _ ⬝hty
quotient_group_functor_homotopy _ _ proof right_inv φ qed ⬝hty
quotient_group_functor_gid },
{ refine quotient_group_functor_compose _ _ _ _ ⬝hty
quotient_group_functor_homotopy _ _ proof left_inv φ qed ⬝hty
quotient_group_functor_gid }
end
definition is_equiv_qg_map {G : Group} (H : property G) [is_normal_subgroup G H]
(H₂ : Π⦃g⦄, g ∈ H → g = 1) : is_equiv (qg_map H) :=
set_quotient.is_equiv_class_of _ (λg h r, eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (H₂ r))
definition quotient_group_isomorphism [constructor] {G : Group} (H : property G)
[is_normal_subgroup G H] (h : Πg, g ∈ H → g = 1) : quotient_group H ≃g G :=
(isomorphism.mk _ (is_equiv_qg_map H h))⁻¹ᵍ
end group
namespace group
variables {G H K : AbGroup} {R : property G} [is_subgroup G R]
{S : property H} [is_subgroup H S]
{T : property K} [is_subgroup K T]
definition quotient_ab_group_functor [constructor] (φ : G →g H)
(h : Πg, g ∈ R → φ g ∈ S) : quotient_ab_group R →g quotient_ab_group S :=
@quotient_group_functor G H R (is_normal_subgroup_ab _) S (is_normal_subgroup_ab _) φ h
definition quotient_ab_group_functor_mul
(ψ φ : G →g H) (hψ : Πg, g ∈ R → ψ g ∈ S) (hφ : Πg, g ∈ R → φ g ∈ S) :
homomorphism_mul (quotient_ab_group_functor ψ hψ) (quotient_ab_group_functor φ hφ) ~
quotient_ab_group_functor (homomorphism_mul ψ φ)
(λg hg, is_subgroup.mul_mem (hψ g hg) (hφ g hg)) :=
begin
intro g, induction g using set_quotient.rec_prop with g hg, reflexivity
end
theorem quotient_ab_group_functor_compose (ψ : H →g K) (φ : G →g H)
(hψ : Πg, g ∈ S → ψ g ∈ T) (hφ : Πg, g ∈ R → φ g ∈ S) :
quotient_ab_group_functor ψ hψ ∘g quotient_ab_group_functor φ hφ ~
quotient_ab_group_functor (ψ ∘g φ) (λg, proof hψ (φ g) qed ∘ hφ g) :=
@quotient_group_functor_compose G H K R _ S _ T _ ψ φ hψ hφ
definition quotient_ab_group_functor_gid :
quotient_ab_group_functor (gid G) (λg, id) ~ gid (quotient_ab_group R) :=
@quotient_group_functor_gid G R _
definition quotient_ab_group_functor_homotopy {ψ φ : G →g H} (hψ : Πg, R g → S (ψ g))
(hφ : Πg, g ∈ R → φ g ∈ S) (p : φ ~ ψ) :
quotient_ab_group_functor φ hφ ~ quotient_ab_group_functor ψ hψ :=
@quotient_group_functor_homotopy G H R _ S _ ψ φ hψ hφ p
definition is_equiv_ab_qg_map {G : AbGroup} (H : property G) [is_subgroup G H]
(h : Π⦃g⦄, g ∈ H → g = 1) : is_equiv (ab_qg_map H) :=
proof @is_equiv_qg_map G H (is_normal_subgroup_ab _) h qed
definition ab_quotient_group_isomorphism [constructor] {G : AbGroup} (H : property G)
[is_subgroup G H] (h : Πg, H g → g = 1) : quotient_ab_group H ≃g G :=
(isomorphism.mk _ (is_equiv_ab_qg_map H h))⁻¹ᵍ
definition quotient_ab_group_isomorphism_quotient_ab_group [constructor] (φ : G ≃g H)
(h : Πg, g ∈ R ↔ φ g ∈ S) : quotient_ab_group R ≃g quotient_ab_group S :=
@quotient_group_isomorphism_quotient_group _ _ _ _ _ _ φ h
end group
|
eb1945c861bc2a7f7de6aa835e879d8e48e2186e | c56b090bd37dca8992124f0b09c22340ef7e27bc | /src/mech-design.lean | 9cfffd9ff06859e7806b475eec09321583d04d97 | [] | no_license | stjordanis/math135 | df113ed7ae9f81b27316cc5b000f88b385391a81 | e270f3a9cae435c066c0d2574f03a8adbe40b7b5 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,069,951,721 | 1,611,905,122,000 | 1,611,905,122,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,634 | lean | import data.nat.basic
import tactic
import data.fin
import tactic.slim_check
import data.multiset.sort
def apply_le {α : Type} (f : α -> ℕ) (a b : α) : Prop := f a ≤ f b
instance decidable_apply_le {α : Type} (f : α -> ℕ) : decidable_rel (apply_le f) :=
begin
intros a b,
by_cases f a ≤ f b,
{
apply is_true,
assumption,
},
apply is_false,
assumption,
end
instance trans_apply_le {α : Type} (f : α -> ℕ) : is_trans α (apply_le f) :=
begin
constructor,
unfold apply_le,
intros a b c a_lt_b b_lt_c,
exact le_trans a_lt_b b_lt_c,
end
instance total_apply_le {α : Type} (f : α -> ℕ) : is_total α (apply_le f) :=
begin
constructor,
unfold apply_le,
intros a b,
by_cases f a ≤ f b,
{
left,
assumption,
},
rw not_le at h,
right,
exact le_of_lt h,
end
instance antisymm_apply_le {α : Type} (f : α -> ℕ) (inj : function.injective f) : is_antisymm α (apply_le f) :=
begin
constructor,
unfold apply_le,
intros a b a_lt_b b_lt_a,
have h : f a = f b,
{
exact le_antisymm a_lt_b b_lt_a,
},
finish,
end
def sort_func_result {α : Type} [fintype α] (f : α → ℕ) (inj : function.injective f) : list α :=
@multiset.sort α (apply_le f) _ _ (antisymm_apply_le f inj) _ (fintype.elems α).val
def vickrey_auction {α : Type} [inhabited α] [fintype α] (bids : α → ℕ) (inj : function.injective bids) :=
begin
have sorted := list.reverse (sort_func_result bids inj),
-- have sorted_not_nil : sorted ≠ list.nil := by sorry,
exact (list.head sorted, bids (list.head (list.tail sorted))),
end
#check vickrey_auction
|
0b7bc20f3d584e492d1af7b4b385a926cc199d42 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/algebra/category/Group/adjunctions_auto.lean | d31b7f96571216f79ef33a806fe1dc4aa96fb2f6 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,409 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.algebra.category.Group.basic
import Mathlib.group_theory.free_abelian_group
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u
namespace Mathlib
/-!
The free abelian group on a type is the left adjoint of the
forgetful functor from abelian groups to types.
-/
namespace AddCommGroup
/--
The free functor `Type u ⥤ AddCommGroup` sending a type `X` to the
free abelian group with generators `x : X`.
-/
def free : Type u ⥤ AddCommGroup :=
category_theory.functor.mk (fun (α : Type u) => of (free_abelian_group α))
fun (X Y : Type u) => free_abelian_group.map
@[simp] theorem free_obj_coe {α : Type u} :
↥(category_theory.functor.obj free α) = free_abelian_group α :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem free_map_coe {α : Type u} {β : Type u} {f : α → β} (x : free_abelian_group α) :
coe_fn (category_theory.functor.map free f) x = f <$> x :=
rfl
/--
The free-forgetful adjunction for abelian groups.
-/
def adj : free ⊣ category_theory.forget AddCommGroup :=
category_theory.adjunction.mk_of_hom_equiv
(category_theory.adjunction.core_hom_equiv.mk
fun (X : Type u) (G : AddCommGroup) => free_abelian_group.hom_equiv X ↥G)
end Mathlib |
f51d738afed810fac8ed182a95bdee782c4995db | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/number_theory/modular_forms/jacobi_theta/manifold.lean | 81a9584cd7556da101699188a6e2644e5834f3ae | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 854 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import number_theory.modular_forms.jacobi_theta.basic
import analysis.complex.upper_half_plane.manifold
/-!
# Manifold differentiability of the Jacobi's theta function
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file we reformulate differentiability of the Jacobi's theta function in terms of manifold
differentiability.
## TODO
Prove smoothness (in terms of `smooth`).
-/
open_locale upper_half_plane manifold
lemma mdifferentiable_jacobi_theta : mdifferentiable 𝓘(ℂ) 𝓘(ℂ) (jacobi_theta ∘ coe : ℍ → ℂ) :=
λ τ, (differentiable_at_jacobi_theta τ.2).mdifferentiable_at.comp τ τ.mdifferentiable_coe
|
b38fa500d3f1420937430ccaa014355dbb4b79f8 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/linear_algebra/affine_space/basic.lean | 6e004ebab06c44fad5b97246a1d27d07dbd13ded | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,705 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Joseph Myers
-/
import algebra.add_torsor
/-!
# Affine space
In this file we introduce the following notation:
* `affine_space V P` is an alternative notation for `add_torsor V P` introduced at the end of this
file.
We tried to use an `abbreviation` instead of a `notation` but this led to hard-to-debug elaboration
errors. So, we introduce a localized notation instead. When this notation is enabled with
`open_locale affine`, Lean will use `affine_space` instead of `add_torsor` both in input and in the
proof state.
Here is an incomplete list of notions related to affine spaces, all of them are defined in other
files:
* `affine_map`: a map between affine spaces that preserves the affine structure;
* `affine_equiv`: an equivalence between affine spaces that preserves the affine structure;
* `affine_subspace`: a subset of an affine space closed w.r.t. affine combinations of points;
* `affine_combination`: an affine combination of points;
* `affine_independent`: affine independent set of points.
## TODO
Some key definitions are not yet present.
* Affine frames. An affine frame might perhaps be represented as an `affine_equiv` to a `finsupp`
(in the general case) or function type (in the finite-dimensional case) that gives the
coordinates, with appropriate proofs of existence when `k` is a field.
* Although results on affine combinations implicitly provide barycentric frames and coordinates,
there is no explicit representation of the map from a point to its coordinates.
-/
localized "notation `affine_space` := add_torsor" in affine
|
096b37af858b6186a3f0dd3ca2477c5419a2b82e | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/tactic/equiv_rw.lean | e1e5cb3df82fb734d603b44179c05d15774d6e9c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,719 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import data.equiv.basic
import tactic.clear
import tactic.simp_result
import tactic.apply
import control.equiv_functor.instances -- these make equiv_rw more powerful!
import data.equiv.functor -- so do these!
/-!
# The `equiv_rw` tactic transports goals or hypotheses along equivalences.
The basic syntax is `equiv_rw e`, where `e : α ≃ β` is an equivalence.
This will try to replace occurrences of `α` in the goal with `β`, for example
transforming
* `⊢ α` to `⊢ β`,
* `⊢ option α` to `⊢ option β`
* `⊢ {a // P}` to `{b // P (⇑(equiv.symm e) b)}`
The tactic can also be used to rewrite hypotheses, using the syntax `equiv_rw e at h`.
## Implementation details
The main internal function is `equiv_rw_type e t`,
which attempts to turn an expression `e : α ≃ β` into a new equivalence with left hand side `t`.
As an example, with `t = option α`, it will generate `functor.map_equiv option e`.
This is achieved by generating a new synthetic goal `%%t ≃ _`,
and calling `solve_by_elim` with an appropriate set of congruence lemmas.
To avoid having to specify the relevant congruence lemmas by hand,
we mostly rely on `equiv_functor.map_equiv` and `bifunctor.map_equiv`
along with some structural congruence lemmas such as
* `equiv.arrow_congr'`,
* `equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype'`,
* `equiv.sigma_congr_left'`, and
* `equiv.Pi_congr_left'`.
The main `equiv_rw` function, when operating on the goal, simply generates a new equivalence `e'`
with left hand side matching the target, and calls `apply e'.inv_fun`.
When operating on a hypothesis `x : α`, we introduce a new fact `h : x = e.symm (e x)`, revert this,
and then attempt to `generalize`, replacing all occurrences of `e x` with a new constant `y`, before
`intro`ing and `subst`ing `h`, and renaming `y` back to `x`.
## Future improvements
In a future PR I anticipate that `derive equiv_functor` should work on many examples,
(internally using `transport`, which is in turn based on `equiv_rw`)
and we can incrementally bootstrap the strength of `equiv_rw`.
An ambitious project might be to add `equiv_rw!`,
a tactic which, when failing to find appropriate `equiv_functor` instances,
attempts to `derive` them on the spot.
For now `equiv_rw` is entirely based on `equiv`,
but the framework can readily be generalised to also work with other types of equivalences,
for example specific notations such as ring equivalence (`≃+*`),
or general categorical isomorphisms (`≅`).
This will allow us to transport across more general types of equivalences,
but this will wait for another subsequent PR.
-/
namespace tactic
/-- A list of lemmas used for constructing congruence equivalences. -/
-- Although this looks 'hard-coded', in fact the lemma `equiv_functor.map_equiv`
-- allows us to extend `equiv_rw` simply by constructing new instance so `equiv_functor`.
-- TODO: We should also use `category_theory.functorial` and `category_theory.hygienic` instances.
-- (example goal: we could rewrite along an isomorphism of rings (either as `R ≅ S` or `R ≃+* S`)
-- and turn an `x : mv_polynomial σ R` into an `x : mv_polynomial σ S`.).
meta def equiv_congr_lemmas : list (tactic expr) :=
[ `equiv.of_iff,
-- TODO decide what to do with this; it's an equiv_bifunctor?
`equiv.equiv_congr,
-- The function arrow is technically a bifunctor `Typeᵒᵖ → Type → Type`,
-- but the pattern matcher will never see this.
`equiv.arrow_congr',
-- Allow rewriting in subtypes:
`equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype',
-- Allow rewriting in the first component of a sigma-type:
`equiv.sigma_congr_left',
-- Allow rewriting ∀s:
-- (You might think that repeated application of `equiv.forall_congr'
-- would handle the higher arity cases, but unfortunately unification is not clever enough.)
`equiv.forall₃_congr',
`equiv.forall₂_congr',
`equiv.forall_congr',
-- Allow rewriting in argument of Pi types:
`equiv.Pi_congr_left',
-- Handles `sum` and `prod`, and many others:
`bifunctor.map_equiv,
-- Handles `list`, `option`, `unique`, and many others:
`equiv_functor.map_equiv,
-- We have to filter results to ensure we don't cheat and use exclusively
-- `equiv.refl` and `iff.refl`!
`equiv.refl,
`iff.refl
].map (λ n, mk_const n)
declare_trace equiv_rw_type
/--
Configuration structure for `equiv_rw`.
* `max_depth` bounds the search depth for equivalences to rewrite along.
The default value is 10.
(e.g., if you're rewriting along `e : α ≃ β`, and `max_depth := 2`,
you can rewrite `option (option α))` but not `option (option (option α))`.
-/
meta structure equiv_rw_cfg :=
(max_depth : ℕ := 10)
/--
Implementation of `equiv_rw_type`, using `solve_by_elim`.
Expects a goal of the form `t ≃ _`,
and tries to solve it using `eq : α ≃ β` and congruence lemmas.
-/
meta def equiv_rw_type_core (eq : expr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg) : tactic unit :=
do
/-
We now call `solve_by_elim` to try to generate the requested equivalence.
There are a few subtleties!
* We make sure that `eq` is the first lemma, so it is applied whenever possible.
* In `equiv_congr_lemmas`, we put `equiv.refl` last so it is only used when it is not possible
to descend further.
* Since some congruence lemmas generate subgoals with `∀` statements,
we use the `pre_apply` subtactic of `solve_by_elim` to preprocess each new goal with `intros`.
-/
solve_by_elim
{ use_symmetry := false,
use_exfalso := false,
lemma_thunks := some (pure eq :: equiv_congr_lemmas),
ctx_thunk := pure [],
max_depth := cfg.max_depth,
-- Subgoals may contain function types,
-- and we want to continue trying to construct equivalences after the binders.
pre_apply := tactic.intros >> skip,
backtrack_all_goals := tt,
-- If solve_by_elim gets stuck, make sure it isn't because there's a later `≃` or `↔` goal
-- that we should still attempt.
discharger :=
`[success_if_fail { match_target _ ≃ _ }] >> `[success_if_fail { match_target _ ↔ _ }] >>
(`[show _ ≃ _] <|> `[show _ ↔ _]) <|>
trace_if_enabled `equiv_rw_type "Failed, no congruence lemma applied!" >> failed,
-- We use the `accept` tactic in `solve_by_elim` to provide tracing.
accept := λ goals, lock_tactic_state (do
when_tracing `equiv_rw_type (do
goals.mmap pp >>= λ goals, trace format!"So far, we've built: {goals}"),
done <|>
when_tracing `equiv_rw_type (do
gs ← get_goals,
gs ← gs.mmap (λ g, infer_type g >>= pp),
trace format!"Attempting to adapt to {gs}")) }
/--
`equiv_rw_type e t` rewrites the type `t` using the equivalence `e : α ≃ β`,
returning a new equivalence `t ≃ t'`.
-/
meta def equiv_rw_type (eqv : expr) (ty : expr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg) : tactic expr :=
do
when_tracing `equiv_rw_type (do
ty_pp ← pp ty,
eqv_pp ← pp eqv,
eqv_ty_pp ← infer_type eqv >>= pp,
trace format!"Attempting to rewrite the type `{ty_pp}` using `{eqv_pp} : {eqv_ty_pp}`."),
`(_ ≃ _) ← infer_type eqv | fail format!"{eqv} must be an `equiv`",
-- We prepare a synthetic goal of type `(%%ty ≃ _)`, for some placeholder right hand side.
equiv_ty ← to_expr ``(%%ty ≃ _),
-- Now call `equiv_rw_type_core`.
new_eqv ← prod.snd <$> (solve_aux equiv_ty $ equiv_rw_type_core eqv cfg),
-- Check that we actually used the equivalence `eq`
-- (`equiv_rw_type_core` will always find `equiv.refl`,
-- but hopefully only after all other possibilities)
new_eqv ← instantiate_mvars new_eqv,
-- We previously had `guard (eqv.occurs new_eqv)` here, but `kdepends_on` is more reliable.
kdepends_on new_eqv eqv >>= guardb <|> (do
eqv_pp ← pp eqv,
ty_pp ← pp ty,
fail format!"Could not construct an equivalence from {eqv_pp} of the form: {ty_pp} ≃ _"),
-- Finally we simplify the resulting equivalence,
-- to compress away some `map_equiv equiv.refl` subexpressions.
prod.fst <$> new_eqv.simp {fail_if_unchanged := ff}
mk_simp_attribute equiv_rw_simp "The simpset `equiv_rw_simp` is used by the tactic `equiv_rw` to
simplify applications of equivalences and their inverses."
attribute [equiv_rw_simp] equiv.symm_symm equiv.apply_symm_apply equiv.symm_apply_apply
/--
Attempt to replace the hypothesis with name `x`
by transporting it along the equivalence in `e : α ≃ β`.
-/
meta def equiv_rw_hyp (x : name) (e : expr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg := {}) : tactic unit :=
-- We call `dsimp_result` to perform the beta redex introduced by `revert`
dsimp_result (do
x' ← get_local x,
x_ty ← infer_type x',
-- Adapt `e` to an equivalence with left-hand-side `x_ty`.
e ← equiv_rw_type e x_ty cfg,
eq ← to_expr ``(%%x' = equiv.symm %%e (equiv.to_fun %%e %%x')),
prf ← to_expr ``((equiv.symm_apply_apply %%e %%x').symm),
h ← note_anon eq prf,
-- Revert the new hypothesis, so it is also part of the goal.
revert h,
ex ← to_expr ``(equiv.to_fun %%e %%x'),
-- Now call `generalize`,
-- attempting to replace all occurrences of `e x`,
-- calling it for now `j : β`, with `k : x = e.symm j`.
generalize ex (by apply_opt_param) transparency.none,
-- Reintroduce `x` (now of type `b`), and the hypothesis `h`.
intro x,
h ← intro1,
-- Finally, if we're working on properties, substitute along `h`, then do some cleanup,
-- and if we're working on data, just throw out the old `x`.
b ← target >>= is_prop,
if b then do
subst h,
`[try { simp only with equiv_rw_simp }]
else
-- We may need to unfreeze `x` before we can `clear` it.
unfreezing_hyp x' (clear' tt [x']) <|> fail
format!"equiv_rw expected to be able to clear the original hypothesis {x}, but couldn't.",
skip)
{fail_if_unchanged := ff} tt -- call `dsimp_result` with `no_defaults := tt`.
/-- Rewrite the goal using an equiv `e`. -/
meta def equiv_rw_target (e : expr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg := {}) : tactic unit :=
do
t ← target,
e ← equiv_rw_type e t cfg,
s ← to_expr ``(equiv.inv_fun %%e),
tactic.eapply s,
skip
end tactic
namespace tactic.interactive
open tactic
setup_tactic_parser
/-- Auxiliary function to call `equiv_rw_hyp` on a `list pexpr` recursively. -/
meta def equiv_rw_hyp_aux (hyp : name) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg) (permissive : bool := ff) :
list expr → itactic
| [] := skip
| (e :: t) := do
if permissive then equiv_rw_hyp hyp e cfg <|> skip
else equiv_rw_hyp hyp e cfg,
equiv_rw_hyp_aux t
/-- Auxiliary function to call `equiv_rw_target` on a `list pexpr` recursively. -/
meta def equiv_rw_target_aux (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg) (permissive : bool) :
list expr → itactic
| [] := skip
| (e :: t) := do
if permissive then equiv_rw_target e cfg <|> skip
else equiv_rw_target e cfg,
equiv_rw_target_aux t
/--
`equiv_rw e at h₁ h₂ ⋯`, where each `hᵢ : α` is a hypothesis, and `e : α ≃ β`,
will attempt to transport each `hᵢ` along `e`, producing a new hypothesis `hᵢ : β`,
with all occurrences of `hᵢ` in other hypotheses and the goal replaced with `e.symm hᵢ`.
`equiv_rw e` will attempt to transport the goal along an equivalence `e : α ≃ β`.
In its minimal form it replaces the goal `⊢ α` with `⊢ β` by calling `apply e.inv_fun`.
`equiv_rw [e₁, e₂, ⋯] at h₁ h₂ ⋯` is equivalent to
`{ equiv_rw [e₁, e₂, ⋯] at h₁, equiv_rw [e₁, e₂, ⋯] at h₂, ⋯ }`.
`equiv_rw [e₁, e₂, ⋯] at *` will attempt to apply `equiv_rw [e₁, e₂, ⋯]` on the goal
and on each expression available in the local context (except on the `eᵢ`s themselves),
failing silently when it can't. Failing on a rewrite for a certain `eᵢ` at a certain
hypothesis `h` doesn't stop `equiv_rw` from trying the other equivalences on the list
at `h`. This only happens for the wildcard location.
`equiv_rw` will also try rewriting under (equiv_)functors, so it can turn
a hypothesis `h : list α` into `h : list β` or
a goal `⊢ unique α` into `⊢ unique β`.
The maximum search depth for rewriting in subexpressions is controlled by
`equiv_rw e {max_depth := n}`.
-/
meta def equiv_rw
(l : parse pexpr_list_or_texpr)
(locat : parse location)
(cfg : equiv_rw_cfg := {}) : itactic := do
es ← l.mmap (λ e, to_expr e),
match locat with
| loc.wildcard := do
equiv_rw_target_aux cfg tt es,
ctx ← local_context,
ctx.mmap (λ e, if e ∈ es then skip else equiv_rw_hyp_aux e.local_pp_name cfg tt es),
skip
| loc.ns names := do
names.mmap
(λ hyp', match hyp' with
| some hyp := equiv_rw_hyp_aux hyp cfg ff es
| none := equiv_rw_target_aux cfg ff es
end),
skip
end
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "equiv_rw",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.equiv_rw],
tags := ["rewriting", "equiv", "transport"] }
/--
Solve a goal of the form `t ≃ _`,
by constructing an equivalence from `e : α ≃ β`.
This is the same equivalence that `equiv_rw` would use to rewrite a term of type `t`.
A typical usage might be:
```
have e' : option α ≃ option β := by equiv_rw_type e
```
-/
meta def equiv_rw_type (e : parse texpr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg := {}) : itactic :=
do
`(%%t ≃ _) ← target | fail "`equiv_rw_type` solves goals of the form `t ≃ _`.",
e ← to_expr e,
tactic.equiv_rw_type e t cfg >>= tactic.exact
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "equiv_rw_type",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.equiv_rw_type],
tags := ["rewriting", "equiv", "transport"] }
end tactic.interactive
|
09b8879475e3c2e80abe460bff0ec78ead39d905 | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/logic/function.lean | f5c1f65c2f85117fd14c0206c13c6f41e21d6874 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,194 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
Miscellaneous function constructions and lemmas.
-/
import logic.basic data.option.defs
universes u v w
namespace function
section
variables {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {f : α → β}
lemma hfunext {α α': Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {β' : α' → Sort v} {f : Πa, β a} {f' : Πa, β' a}
(hα : α = α') (h : ∀a a', a == a' → f a == f' a') : f == f' :=
begin
subst hα,
have : ∀a, f a == f' a,
{ intro a, exact h a a (heq.refl a) },
have : β = β',
{ funext a, exact type_eq_of_heq (this a) },
subst this,
apply heq_of_eq,
funext a,
exact eq_of_heq (this a)
end
lemma funext_iff {β : α → Sort*} {f₁ f₂ : Π (x : α), β x} : f₁ = f₂ ↔ (∀a, f₁ a = f₂ a) :=
iff.intro (assume h a, h ▸ rfl) funext
lemma comp_apply {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {φ : Sort w} (f : β → φ) (g : α → β) (a : α) :
(f ∘ g) a = f (g a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem injective.eq_iff (I : injective f) {a b : α} :
f a = f b ↔ a = b :=
⟨@I _ _, congr_arg f⟩
lemma injective.ne (hf : function.injective f) {a₁ a₂ : α} : a₁ ≠ a₂ → f a₁ ≠ f a₂ :=
mt (assume h, hf h)
def injective.decidable_eq [decidable_eq β] (I : injective f) : decidable_eq α
| a b := decidable_of_iff _ I.eq_iff
lemma injective.of_comp {γ : Sort w} {g : γ → α} (I : injective (f ∘ g)) : injective g :=
λ x y h, I $ show f (g x) = f (g y), from congr_arg f h
lemma surjective.of_comp {γ : Sort w} {g : γ → α} (S : surjective (f ∘ g)) : surjective f :=
λ y, let ⟨x, h⟩ := S y in ⟨g x, h⟩
instance decidable_eq_pfun (p : Prop) [decidable p] (α : p → Type*)
[Π hp, decidable_eq (α hp)] : decidable_eq (Π hp, α hp)
| f g := decidable_of_iff (∀ hp, f hp = g hp) funext_iff.symm
theorem cantor_surjective {α} (f : α → α → Prop) : ¬ function.surjective f | h :=
let ⟨D, e⟩ := h (λ a, ¬ f a a) in
(iff_not_self (f D D)).1 $ iff_of_eq (congr_fun e D)
theorem cantor_injective {α : Type*} (f : (α → Prop) → α) :
¬ function.injective f | i :=
cantor_surjective (λ a b, ∀ U, a = f U → U b) $
surjective_of_has_right_inverse ⟨f, λ U, funext $
λ a, propext ⟨λ h, h U rfl, λ h' U' e, i e ▸ h'⟩⟩
/-- `g` is a partial inverse to `f` (an injective but not necessarily
surjective function) if `g y = some x` implies `f x = y`, and `g y = none`
implies that `y` is not in the range of `f`. -/
def is_partial_inv {α β} (f : α → β) (g : β → option α) : Prop :=
∀ x y, g y = some x ↔ f x = y
theorem is_partial_inv_left {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : is_partial_inv f g) (x) : g (f x) = some x :=
(H _ _).2 rfl
theorem injective_of_partial_inv {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : is_partial_inv f g) : injective f :=
λ a b h, option.some.inj $ ((H _ _).2 h).symm.trans ((H _ _).2 rfl)
theorem injective_of_partial_inv_right {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : is_partial_inv f g)
(x y b) (h₁ : b ∈ g x) (h₂ : b ∈ g y) : x = y :=
((H _ _).1 h₁).symm.trans ((H _ _).1 h₂)
theorem left_inverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : left_inverse f g) : f ∘ g = id :=
funext h
theorem right_inverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : right_inverse f g) : g ∘ f = id :=
funext h
theorem left_inverse.comp {γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β}
(hf : left_inverse f g) (hh : left_inverse h i) : left_inverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
assume a, show h (f (g (i a))) = a, by rw [hf (i a), hh a]
theorem right_inverse.comp {γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β}
(hf : right_inverse f g) (hh : right_inverse h i) : right_inverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
left_inverse.comp hh hf
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
/-- We can use choice to construct explicitly a partial inverse for
a given injective function `f`. -/
noncomputable def partial_inv {α β} (f : α → β) (b : β) : option α :=
if h : ∃ a, f a = b then some (classical.some h) else none
theorem partial_inv_of_injective {α β} {f : α → β} (I : injective f) :
is_partial_inv f (partial_inv f) | a b :=
⟨λ h, if h' : ∃ a, f a = b then begin
rw [partial_inv, dif_pos h'] at h,
injection h with h, subst h,
apply classical.some_spec h'
end else by rw [partial_inv, dif_neg h'] at h; contradiction,
λ e, e ▸ have h : ∃ a', f a' = f a, from ⟨_, rfl⟩,
(dif_pos h).trans (congr_arg _ (I $ classical.some_spec h))⟩
theorem partial_inv_left {α β} {f : α → β} (I : injective f) : ∀ x, partial_inv f (f x) = some x :=
is_partial_inv_left (partial_inv_of_injective I)
end
section inv_fun
variables {α : Type u} [inhabited α] {β : Sort v} {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α} {b : β}
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
/-- Construct the inverse for a function `f` on domain `s`. -/
noncomputable def inv_fun_on (f : α → β) (s : set α) (b : β) : α :=
if h : ∃a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b then classical.some h else default α
theorem inv_fun_on_pos (h : ∃a∈s, f a = b) : inv_fun_on f s b ∈ s ∧ f (inv_fun_on f s b) = b :=
by rw [bex_def] at h; rw [inv_fun_on, dif_pos h]; exact classical.some_spec h
theorem inv_fun_on_mem (h : ∃a∈s, f a = b) : inv_fun_on f s b ∈ s := (inv_fun_on_pos h).left
theorem inv_fun_on_eq (h : ∃a∈s, f a = b) : f (inv_fun_on f s b) = b := (inv_fun_on_pos h).right
theorem inv_fun_on_eq' (h : ∀ x y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) (ha : a ∈ s) :
inv_fun_on f s (f a) = a :=
have ∃a'∈s, f a' = f a, from ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩,
h _ _ (inv_fun_on_mem this) ha (inv_fun_on_eq this)
theorem inv_fun_on_neg (h : ¬ ∃a∈s, f a = b) : inv_fun_on f s b = default α :=
by rw [bex_def] at h; rw [inv_fun_on, dif_neg h]
/-- The inverse of a function (which is a left inverse if `f` is injective
and a right inverse if `f` is surjective). -/
noncomputable def inv_fun (f : α → β) : β → α := inv_fun_on f set.univ
theorem inv_fun_eq (h : ∃a, f a = b) : f (inv_fun f b) = b :=
inv_fun_on_eq $ let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h in ⟨a, trivial, ha⟩
lemma inv_fun_neg (h : ¬ ∃ a, f a = b) : inv_fun f b = default α :=
by refine inv_fun_on_neg (mt _ h); exact assume ⟨a, _, ha⟩, ⟨a, ha⟩
theorem inv_fun_eq_of_injective_of_right_inverse {g : β → α}
(hf : injective f) (hg : right_inverse g f) : inv_fun f = g :=
funext $ assume b,
hf begin rw [hg b], exact inv_fun_eq ⟨g b, hg b⟩ end
lemma right_inverse_inv_fun (hf : surjective f) : right_inverse (inv_fun f) f :=
assume b, inv_fun_eq $ hf b
lemma left_inverse_inv_fun (hf : injective f) : left_inverse (inv_fun f) f :=
assume b,
have f (inv_fun f (f b)) = f b,
from inv_fun_eq ⟨b, rfl⟩,
hf this
lemma inv_fun_surjective (hf : injective f) : surjective (inv_fun f) :=
surjective_of_has_right_inverse ⟨_, left_inverse_inv_fun hf⟩
lemma inv_fun_comp (hf : injective f) : inv_fun f ∘ f = id := funext $ left_inverse_inv_fun hf
lemma injective.has_left_inverse (hf : injective f) : has_left_inverse f :=
⟨inv_fun f, left_inverse_inv_fun hf⟩
lemma injective_iff_has_left_inverse : injective f ↔ has_left_inverse f :=
⟨injective.has_left_inverse, injective_of_has_left_inverse⟩
end inv_fun
section surj_inv
variables {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {f : α → β}
/-- The inverse of a surjective function. (Unlike `inv_fun`, this does not require
`α` to be inhabited.) -/
noncomputable def surj_inv {f : α → β} (h : surjective f) (b : β) : α := classical.some (h b)
lemma surj_inv_eq (h : surjective f) (b) : f (surj_inv h b) = b := classical.some_spec (h b)
lemma right_inverse_surj_inv (hf : surjective f) : right_inverse (surj_inv hf) f :=
surj_inv_eq hf
lemma left_inverse_surj_inv (hf : bijective f) : left_inverse (surj_inv hf.2) f :=
right_inverse_of_injective_of_left_inverse hf.1 (right_inverse_surj_inv hf.2)
lemma surjective.has_right_inverse (hf : surjective f) : has_right_inverse f :=
⟨_, right_inverse_surj_inv hf⟩
lemma surjective_iff_has_right_inverse : surjective f ↔ has_right_inverse f :=
⟨surjective.has_right_inverse, surjective_of_has_right_inverse⟩
lemma bijective_iff_has_inverse : bijective f ↔ ∃ g, left_inverse g f ∧ right_inverse g f :=
⟨λ hf, ⟨_, left_inverse_surj_inv hf, right_inverse_surj_inv hf.2⟩,
λ ⟨g, gl, gr⟩, ⟨injective_of_left_inverse gl, surjective_of_has_right_inverse ⟨_, gr⟩⟩⟩
lemma injective_surj_inv (h : surjective f) : injective (surj_inv h) :=
injective_of_has_left_inverse ⟨f, right_inverse_surj_inv h⟩
end surj_inv
section update
variables {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [decidable_eq α]
def update (f : Πa, β a) (a' : α) (v : β a') (a : α) : β a :=
if h : a = a' then eq.rec v h.symm else f a
@[simp] lemma update_same {a : α} {v : β a} {f : Πa, β a} : update f a v a = v :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp] lemma update_noteq {a a' : α} {v : β a'} {f : Πa, β a} (h : a ≠ a') : update f a' v a = f a :=
dif_neg h
end update
lemma uncurry_def {α β γ} (f : α → β → γ) : uncurry f = (λp, f p.1 p.2) :=
funext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl
-- `uncurry'` is the version of `uncurry` with correct definitional reductions
def uncurry' {α β γ} (f : α → β → γ) := λ p : α × β, f p.1 p.2
@[simp]
lemma curry_uncurry' {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} (f : α → β → γ) : curry (uncurry' f) = f :=
by funext ; refl
@[simp]
lemma uncurry'_curry {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} (f : α × β → γ) : uncurry' (curry f) = f :=
by { funext, simp [curry, uncurry', prod.mk.eta] }
def restrict {α β} (f : α → β) (s : set α) : subtype s → β := λ x, f x.val
theorem restrict_eq {α β} (f : α → β) (s : set α) : function.restrict f s = f ∘ (@subtype.val _ s) := rfl
section bicomp
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {ε : Type*}
def bicompl (f : γ → δ → ε) (g : α → γ) (h : β → δ) (a b) :=
f (g a) (h b)
def bicompr (f : γ → δ) (g : α → β → γ) (a b) :=
f (g a b)
-- Suggested local notation:
local notation f `∘₂` g := bicompr f g
lemma uncurry_bicompr (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
uncurry (g ∘₂ f) = (g ∘ uncurry f) :=
funext $ λ ⟨p, q⟩, rfl
lemma uncurry'_bicompr (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
uncurry' (g ∘₂ f) = (g ∘ uncurry' f) := rfl
end bicomp
/-- A function is involutive, if `f ∘ f = id`. -/
def involutive {α} (f : α → α) : Prop := ∀ x, f (f x) = x
lemma involutive_iff_iter_2_eq_id {α} {f : α → α} : involutive f ↔ (f^[2] = id) :=
funext_iff.symm
namespace involutive
variables {α : Sort u} {f : α → α} (h : involutive f)
protected lemma left_inverse : left_inverse f f := h
protected lemma right_inverse : right_inverse f f := h
protected lemma injective : injective f := injective_of_left_inverse h.left_inverse
protected lemma surjective : surjective f := λ x, ⟨f x, h x⟩
protected lemma bijective : bijective f := ⟨h.injective, h.surjective⟩
end involutive
end function
|
db4edb5f72428fcbcaa346d018676c969e1ef4c0 | 46125763b4dbf50619e8846a1371029346f4c3db | /src/set_theory/ordinal.lean | eb57e55534c9506efcbc813ad84b04b2e4af9744 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | thjread/mathlib | a9d97612cedc2c3101060737233df15abcdb9eb1 | 7cffe2520a5518bba19227a107078d83fa725ddc | refs/heads/master | 1,615,637,696,376 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 246,680,271 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,583,960,875,000 | 1,583,960,875,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 138,351 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
Ordinal arithmetic.
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets by order isomorphism.
-/
import order.order_iso set_theory.cardinal data.sum
noncomputable theory
open function cardinal set equiv
open_locale classical cardinal
universes u v w
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-- If `r` is a relation on `α` and `s` in a relation on `β`, then `f : r ≼i s` is an order embedding whose range is an initial segment. That is, whenever `b < f a` in `β` then `b` is in the range of `f`. -/
structure initial_seg {α β : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) extends r ≼o s :=
(init : ∀ a b, s b (to_order_embedding a) → ∃ a', to_order_embedding a' = b)
local infix ` ≼i `:25 := initial_seg
namespace initial_seg
instance : has_coe (r ≼i s) (r ≼o s) := ⟨initial_seg.to_order_embedding⟩
instance : has_coe_to_fun (r ≼i s) := ⟨λ _, α → β, λ f x, (f : r ≼o s) x⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_mk (f : r ≼o s) (o) :
(@initial_seg.mk _ _ r s f o : α → β) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_to_order_embedding (f : r ≼i s) : (f.to_order_embedding : α → β) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_coe_fn (f : r ≼i s) : ((f : r ≼o s) : α → β) = f := rfl
theorem init' (f : r ≼i s) {a : α} {b : β} : s b (f a) → ∃ a', f a' = b :=
f.init _ _
theorem init_iff (f : r ≼i s) {a : α} {b : β} : s b (f a) ↔ ∃ a', f a' = b ∧ r a' a :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := f.init' h in ⟨a', e, (f : r ≼o s).ord'.2 (e.symm ▸ h)⟩,
λ ⟨a', e, h⟩, e ▸ (f : r ≼o s).ord'.1 h⟩
/-- An order isomorphism is an initial segment -/
def of_iso (f : r ≃o s) : r ≼i s :=
⟨f, λ a b h, ⟨f.symm b, order_iso.apply_symm_apply f _⟩⟩
/-- The identity function shows that `≼i` is reflexive -/
@[refl] protected def refl (r : α → α → Prop) : r ≼i r :=
⟨order_embedding.refl _, λ a b h, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩
/-- Composition of functions shows that `≼i` is transitive -/
@[trans] protected def trans (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i t) : r ≼i t :=
⟨f.1.trans g.1, λ a c h, begin
simp at h ⊢,
rcases g.2 _ _ h with ⟨b, rfl⟩, have h := g.1.ord'.2 h,
rcases f.2 _ _ h with ⟨a', rfl⟩, exact ⟨a', rfl⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem of_iso_apply (f : r ≃o s) (x : α) : (f : r ≼o s) x = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem refl_apply (x : α) : initial_seg.refl r x = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem trans_apply (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i t) (a : α) : (f.trans g) a = g (f a) := rfl
theorem unique_of_extensional [is_extensional β s] :
well_founded r → subsingleton (r ≼i s) | ⟨h⟩ :=
⟨λ f g, begin
suffices : (f : α → β) = g, { cases f, cases g,
congr, exact order_embedding.eq_of_to_fun_eq this },
funext a, have := h a, induction this with a H IH,
refine @is_extensional.ext _ s _ _ _ (λ x, ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩),
{ rcases f.init_iff.1 h with ⟨y, rfl, h'⟩,
rw IH _ h', exact (g : r ≼o s).ord'.1 h' },
{ rcases g.init_iff.1 h with ⟨y, rfl, h'⟩,
rw ← IH _ h', exact (f : r ≼o s).ord'.1 h' }
end⟩
instance [is_well_order β s] : subsingleton (r ≼i s) :=
⟨λ a, @subsingleton.elim _ (unique_of_extensional
(@order_embedding.well_founded _ _ r s a (is_well_order.wf s))) a⟩
protected theorem eq [is_well_order β s] (f g : r ≼i s) (a) : f a = g a :=
by rw subsingleton.elim f g
theorem antisymm.aux [is_well_order α r] (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) : left_inverse g f :=
initial_seg.eq (f.trans g) (initial_seg.refl _)
/-- If we have order embeddings between `α` and `β` whose images are initial segments, and β is a well-order then `α` and `β` are order-isomorphic. -/
def antisymm [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) : r ≃o s :=
by haveI := f.to_order_embedding.is_well_order; exact
⟨⟨f, g, antisymm.aux f g, antisymm.aux g f⟩, f.ord⟩
@[simp] theorem antisymm_to_fun [is_well_order β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) : (antisymm f g : α → β) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem antisymm_symm [is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) : (antisymm f g).symm = antisymm g f :=
order_iso.eq_of_to_fun_eq rfl
theorem eq_or_principal [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼i s) : surjective f ∨ ∃ b, ∀ x, s x b ↔ ∃ y, f y = x :=
or_iff_not_imp_right.2 $ λ h b,
acc.rec_on ((is_well_order.wf s).apply b) $ λ x H IH,
not_forall_not.1 $ λ hn,
h ⟨x, λ y, ⟨(IH _), λ ⟨a, e⟩, by rw ← e; exact
(trichotomous _ _).resolve_right
(not_or (hn a) (λ hl, not_exists.2 hn (f.init' hl)))⟩⟩
/-- Restrict the codomain of an initial segment -/
def cod_restrict (p : set β) (f : r ≼i s) (H : ∀ a, f a ∈ p) : r ≼i subrel s p :=
⟨order_embedding.cod_restrict p f H, λ a ⟨b, m⟩ (h : s b (f a)),
let ⟨a', e⟩ := f.init' h in ⟨a', by clear _let_match; subst e; refl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem cod_restrict_apply (p) (f : r ≼i s) (H a) : cod_restrict p f H a = ⟨f a, H a⟩ := rfl
def le_add (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) : r ≼i sum.lex r s :=
⟨⟨⟨sum.inl, λ _ _, sum.inl.inj⟩, λ a b, sum.lex_inl_inl.symm⟩,
λ a b, by cases b; [exact λ _, ⟨_, rfl⟩, exact false.elim ∘ sum.lex_inr_inl]⟩
@[simp] theorem le_add_apply (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop)
(a) : le_add r s a = sum.inl a := rfl
end initial_seg
structure principal_seg {α β : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) extends r ≼o s :=
(top : β)
(down : ∀ b, s b top ↔ ∃ a, to_order_embedding a = b)
local infix ` ≺i `:25 := principal_seg
namespace principal_seg
instance : has_coe (r ≺i s) (r ≼o s) := ⟨principal_seg.to_order_embedding⟩
instance : has_coe_to_fun (r ≺i s) := ⟨λ _, α → β, λ f, f⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_mk (f : r ≼o s) (t o) :
(@principal_seg.mk _ _ r s f t o : α → β) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_to_order_embedding (f : r ≺i s) : (f.to_order_embedding : α → β) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_coe_fn (f : r ≺i s) : ((f : r ≼o s) : α → β) = f := rfl
theorem down' (f : r ≺i s) {b : β} : s b f.top ↔ ∃ a, f a = b :=
f.down _
theorem lt_top (f : r ≺i s) (a : α) : s (f a) f.top :=
f.down'.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem init [is_trans β s] (f : r ≺i s) {a : α} {b : β} (h : s b (f a)) : ∃ a', f a' = b :=
f.down'.1 $ trans h $ f.lt_top _
instance has_coe_initial_seg [is_trans β s] : has_coe (r ≺i s) (r ≼i s) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨f.to_order_embedding, λ a b, f.init⟩⟩
theorem coe_coe_fn' [is_trans β s] (f : r ≺i s) : ((f : r ≼i s) : α → β) = f := rfl
theorem init_iff [is_trans β s] (f : r ≺i s) {a : α} {b : β} : s b (f a) ↔ ∃ a', f a' = b ∧ r a' a :=
@initial_seg.init_iff α β r s f a b
theorem irrefl (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (f : r ≺i r) : false :=
begin
have := f.lt_top f.top,
rw [show f f.top = f.top, from
initial_seg.eq ↑f (initial_seg.refl r) f.top] at this,
exact irrefl _ this
end
def lt_le (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≼i t) : r ≺i t :=
⟨@order_embedding.trans _ _ _ r s t f g, g f.top, λ a,
by simp only [g.init_iff, f.down', exists_and_distrib_left.symm,
exists_swap, order_embedding.trans_apply, exists_eq_right']; refl⟩
@[simp] theorem lt_le_apply (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≼i t) (a : α) : (f.lt_le g) a = g (f a) :=
order_embedding.trans_apply _ _ _
@[simp] theorem lt_le_top (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≼i t) : (f.lt_le g).top = g f.top := rfl
@[trans] protected def trans [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≺i t) : r ≺i t :=
lt_le f g
@[simp] theorem trans_apply [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≺i t) (a : α) : (f.trans g) a = g (f a) :=
lt_le_apply _ _ _
@[simp] theorem trans_top [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≺i t) : (f.trans g).top = g f.top := rfl
def equiv_lt (f : r ≃o s) (g : s ≺i t) : r ≺i t :=
⟨@order_embedding.trans _ _ _ r s t f g, g.top, λ c,
suffices (∃ (a : β), g a = c) ↔ ∃ (a : α), g (f a) = c, by simpa [g.down],
⟨λ ⟨b, h⟩, ⟨f.symm b, by simp only [h, order_iso.apply_symm_apply, order_iso.coe_coe_fn]⟩,
λ ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨f a, h⟩⟩⟩
def lt_equiv {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
(f : principal_seg r s) (g : s ≃o t) : principal_seg r t :=
⟨@order_embedding.trans _ _ _ r s t f g, g f.top,
begin
intro x,
rw [←g.right_inv x],
simp only [order_iso.to_equiv_to_fun, coe_fn_coe_base, order_embedding.trans_apply],
rw [←order_iso.ord'' g, f.down', exists_congr],
intro y, exact ⟨congr_arg g, λ h, g.to_equiv.bijective.1 h⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem equiv_lt_apply (f : r ≃o s) (g : s ≺i t) (a : α) : (equiv_lt f g) a = g (f a) :=
order_embedding.trans_apply _ _ _
@[simp] theorem equiv_lt_top (f : r ≃o s) (g : s ≺i t) : (equiv_lt f g).top = g.top := rfl
instance [is_well_order β s] : subsingleton (r ≺i s) :=
⟨λ f g, begin
have ef : (f : α → β) = g,
{ show ((f : r ≼i s) : α → β) = g,
rw @subsingleton.elim _ _ (f : r ≼i s) g, refl },
have et : f.top = g.top,
{ refine @is_extensional.ext _ s _ _ _ (λ x, _),
simp only [f.down, g.down, ef, coe_fn_to_order_embedding] },
cases f, cases g,
have := order_embedding.eq_of_to_fun_eq ef; congr'
end⟩
theorem top_eq [is_well_order γ t]
(e : r ≃o s) (f : r ≺i t) (g : s ≺i t) : f.top = g.top :=
by rw subsingleton.elim f (principal_seg.equiv_lt e g); refl
lemma top_lt_top {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
[is_well_order γ t]
(f : principal_seg r s) (g : principal_seg s t) (h : principal_seg r t) : t h.top g.top :=
by { rw [subsingleton.elim h (f.trans g)], apply principal_seg.lt_top }
/-- Any element of a well order yields a principal segment -/
def of_element {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : subrel r {b | r b a} ≺i r :=
⟨subrel.order_embedding _ _, a, λ b,
⟨λ h, ⟨⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩, λ ⟨⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem of_element_apply {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) (b) :
of_element r a b = b.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem of_element_top {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) :
(of_element r a).top = a := rfl
/-- Restrict the codomain of a principal segment -/
def cod_restrict (p : set β) (f : r ≺i s)
(H : ∀ a, f a ∈ p) (H₂ : f.top ∈ p) : r ≺i subrel s p :=
⟨order_embedding.cod_restrict p f H, ⟨f.top, H₂⟩, λ ⟨b, h⟩,
f.down'.trans $ exists_congr $ λ a,
show (⟨f a, H a⟩ : p).1 = _ ↔ _, from ⟨subtype.eq, congr_arg _⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem cod_restrict_apply (p) (f : r ≺i s) (H H₂ a) : cod_restrict p f H H₂ a = ⟨f a, H a⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem cod_restrict_top (p) (f : r ≺i s) (H H₂) : (cod_restrict p f H H₂).top = ⟨f.top, H₂⟩ := rfl
end principal_seg
def initial_seg.lt_or_eq [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼i s) :
(r ≺i s) ⊕ (r ≃o s) :=
if h : surjective f then sum.inr (order_iso.of_surjective f h) else
have h' : _, from (initial_seg.eq_or_principal f).resolve_left h,
sum.inl ⟨f, classical.some h', classical.some_spec h'⟩
theorem initial_seg.lt_or_eq_apply_left [is_well_order β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (g : r ≺i s) (a : α) : g a = f a :=
@initial_seg.eq α β r s _ g f a
theorem initial_seg.lt_or_eq_apply_right [is_well_order β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (g : r ≃o s) (a : α) : g a = f a :=
initial_seg.eq (initial_seg.of_iso g) f a
def initial_seg.le_lt [is_well_order β s] [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≺i t) : r ≺i t :=
match f.lt_or_eq with
| sum.inl f' := f'.trans g
| sum.inr f' := principal_seg.equiv_lt f' g
end
@[simp] theorem initial_seg.le_lt_apply [is_well_order β s] [is_trans γ t]
(f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≺i t) (a : α) : (f.le_lt g) a = g (f a) :=
begin
delta initial_seg.le_lt, cases h : f.lt_or_eq with f' f',
{ simp only [principal_seg.trans_apply, f.lt_or_eq_apply_left] },
{ simp only [principal_seg.equiv_lt_apply, f.lt_or_eq_apply_right] }
end
namespace order_embedding
def collapse_F [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼o s) : Π a, {b // ¬ s (f a) b} :=
(order_embedding.well_founded f $ is_well_order.wf s).fix $ λ a IH, begin
let S := {b | ∀ a h, s (IH a h).1 b},
have : f a ∈ S, from λ a' h, ((trichotomous _ _)
.resolve_left $ λ h', (IH a' h).2 $ trans (f.ord'.1 h) h')
.resolve_left $ λ h', (IH a' h).2 $ h' ▸ f.ord'.1 h,
exact ⟨(is_well_order.wf s).min S ⟨_, this⟩,
(is_well_order.wf s).not_lt_min _ _ this⟩
end
theorem collapse_F.lt [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼o s) {a : α}
: ∀ {a'}, r a' a → s (collapse_F f a').1 (collapse_F f a).1 :=
show (collapse_F f a).1 ∈ {b | ∀ a' (h : r a' a), s (collapse_F f a').1 b}, begin
unfold collapse_F, rw well_founded.fix_eq,
apply well_founded.min_mem _ _
end
theorem collapse_F.not_lt [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼o s) (a : α)
{b} (h : ∀ a' (h : r a' a), s (collapse_F f a').1 b) : ¬ s b (collapse_F f a).1 :=
begin
unfold collapse_F, rw well_founded.fix_eq,
exact well_founded.not_lt_min _ _ _
(show b ∈ {b | ∀ a' (h : r a' a), s (collapse_F f a').1 b}, from h)
end
/-- Construct an initial segment from an order embedding. -/
def collapse [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼o s) : r ≼i s :=
by haveI := order_embedding.is_well_order f; exact
⟨order_embedding.of_monotone
(λ a, (collapse_F f a).1) (λ a b, collapse_F.lt f),
λ a b, acc.rec_on ((is_well_order.wf s).apply b) (λ b H IH a h, begin
let S := {a | ¬ s (collapse_F f a).1 b},
have : S.nonempty := ⟨_, asymm h⟩,
existsi (is_well_order.wf r).min S this,
refine ((@trichotomous _ s _ _ _).resolve_left _).resolve_right _,
{ exact (is_well_order.wf r).min_mem S this },
{ refine collapse_F.not_lt f _ (λ a' h', _),
by_contradiction hn,
exact (is_well_order.wf r).not_lt_min S this hn h' }
end) a⟩
theorem collapse_apply [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼o s)
(a) : collapse f a = (collapse_F f a).1 := rfl
end order_embedding
section well_ordering_thm
parameter {σ : Type u}
open function
theorem nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal : nonempty (σ ↪ cardinal.{u}) :=
embedding.total.resolve_left $ λ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩,
let g : σ → cardinal.{u} := inv_fun f in
let ⟨x, (hx : g x = 2 ^ sum g)⟩ := inv_fun_surjective hf (2 ^ sum g) in
have g x ≤ sum g, from le_sum.{u u} g x,
not_le_of_gt (by rw hx; exact cantor _) this
/-- An embedding of any type to the set of cardinals. -/
def embedding_to_cardinal : σ ↪ cardinal.{u} := classical.choice nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal
/-- The relation whose existence is given by the well-ordering theorem -/
def well_ordering_rel : σ → σ → Prop := embedding_to_cardinal ⁻¹'o (<)
instance well_ordering_rel.is_well_order : is_well_order σ well_ordering_rel :=
(order_embedding.preimage _ _).is_well_order
end well_ordering_thm
structure Well_order : Type (u+1) :=
(α : Type u)
(r : α → α → Prop)
(wo : is_well_order α r)
attribute [instance] Well_order.wo
namespace Well_order
instance : inhabited Well_order := ⟨⟨pempty, _, empty_relation.is_well_order⟩⟩
end Well_order
instance ordinal.is_equivalent : setoid Well_order :=
{ r := λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, nonempty (r ≃o s),
iseqv := ⟨λ⟨α, r, _⟩, ⟨order_iso.refl _⟩,
λ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨e⟩, ⟨e.symm⟩,
λ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩, ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩ }
/-- `ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`,
quotient by order isomorphism. -/
def ordinal : Type (u + 1) := quotient ordinal.is_equivalent
namespace ordinal
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : is_well_order α r] : ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (a : α) : ordinal :=
type (subrel r {b | r b a})
theorem type_def (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : is_well_order α r] :
@eq ordinal ⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧ (type r) := rfl
@[simp] theorem type_def' (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] {wo} :
@eq ordinal ⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧ (type r) := rfl
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
type r = type s ↔ nonempty (r ≃o s) := quotient.eq
@[simp] lemma type_out (o : ordinal) : type o.out.r = o :=
by { refine eq.trans _ (by rw [←quotient.out_eq o]), cases quotient.out o, refl }
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem induction_on {C : ordinal → Prop}
(o : ordinal) (H : ∀ α r [is_well_order α r], C (type r)) : C o :=
quot.induction_on o $ λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩, @H α r wo
/-- Ordinal less-equal is defined such that
well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r ≤ type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as an initial segment of `s`. -/
protected def le (a b : ordinal) : Prop :=
quotient.lift_on₂ a b (λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, nonempty (r ≼i s)) $
λ ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩,
propext ⟨
λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨(initial_seg.of_iso f.symm).trans $
h.trans (initial_seg.of_iso g)⟩,
λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨(initial_seg.of_iso f).trans $
h.trans (initial_seg.of_iso g.symm)⟩⟩
instance : has_le ordinal := ⟨ordinal.le⟩
theorem type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
type r ≤ type s ↔ nonempty (r ≼i s) := iff.rfl
theorem type_le' {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ nonempty (r ≼o s) :=
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨f⟩, λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨f.collapse⟩⟩
/-- Ordinal less-than is defined such that
well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r < type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as a principal segment of `s`. -/
def lt (a b : ordinal) : Prop :=
quotient.lift_on₂ a b (λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, nonempty (r ≺i s)) $
λ ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩,
by exactI propext ⟨
λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨principal_seg.equiv_lt f.symm $
h.lt_le (initial_seg.of_iso g)⟩,
λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨principal_seg.equiv_lt f $
h.lt_le (initial_seg.of_iso g.symm)⟩⟩
instance : has_lt ordinal := ⟨ordinal.lt⟩
@[simp] theorem type_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
type r < type s ↔ nonempty (r ≺i s) := iff.rfl
instance : partial_order ordinal :=
{ le := (≤),
lt := (<),
le_refl := quot.ind $ by exact λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩, ⟨initial_seg.refl _⟩,
le_trans := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $
λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩, ⟨f.trans g⟩,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ a b, quotient.induction_on₂ a b $
λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩, by exactI
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨⟨f⟩, λ ⟨g⟩, (f.lt_le g).irrefl _⟩,
λ ⟨⟨f⟩, h⟩, sum.rec_on f.lt_or_eq (λ g, ⟨g⟩)
(λ g, (h ⟨initial_seg.of_iso g.symm⟩).elim)⟩,
le_antisymm := λ x b, show x ≤ b → b ≤ x → x = b, from
quotient.induction_on₂ x b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩,
by exactI quot.sound ⟨initial_seg.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩ }
def initial_seg_out {α β : ordinal} (h : α ≤ β) : initial_seg α.out.r β.out.r :=
begin
rw [←quotient.out_eq α, ←quotient.out_eq β] at h, revert h,
cases quotient.out α, cases quotient.out β, exact classical.choice
end
def principal_seg_out {α β : ordinal} (h : α < β) : principal_seg α.out.r β.out.r :=
begin
rw [←quotient.out_eq α, ←quotient.out_eq β] at h, revert h,
cases quotient.out α, cases quotient.out β, exact classical.choice
end
def order_iso_out {α β : ordinal} (h : α = β) : order_iso α.out.r β.out.r :=
begin
rw [←quotient.out_eq α, ←quotient.out_eq β] at h, revert h,
cases quotient.out α, cases quotient.out β, exact classical.choice ∘ quotient.exact
end
theorem typein_lt_type (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r]
(a : α) : typein r a < type r :=
⟨principal_seg.of_element _ _⟩
@[simp] theorem typein_top {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≺i s) :
typein s f.top = type r :=
eq.symm $ quot.sound ⟨order_iso.of_surjective
(order_embedding.cod_restrict _ f f.lt_top)
(λ ⟨a, h⟩, by rcases f.down'.1 h with ⟨b, rfl⟩; exact ⟨b, rfl⟩)⟩
@[simp] theorem typein_apply {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼i s) (a : α) :
ordinal.typein s (f a) = ordinal.typein r a :=
eq.symm $ quotient.sound ⟨order_iso.of_surjective
(order_embedding.cod_restrict _
((subrel.order_embedding _ _).trans f)
(λ ⟨x, h⟩, by rw [order_embedding.trans_apply]; exact f.to_order_embedding.ord'.1 h))
(λ ⟨y, h⟩, by rcases f.init' h with ⟨a, rfl⟩;
exact ⟨⟨a, f.to_order_embedding.ord'.2 h⟩, subtype.eq $ order_embedding.trans_apply _ _ _⟩)⟩
@[simp] theorem typein_lt_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r]
{a b : α} : typein r a < typein r b ↔ r a b :=
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, begin
have : f.top.1 = a,
{ let f' := principal_seg.of_element r a,
let g' := f.trans (principal_seg.of_element r b),
have : g'.top = f'.top, {rw subsingleton.elim f' g'},
exact this },
rw ← this, exact f.top.2
end, λ h, ⟨principal_seg.cod_restrict _
(principal_seg.of_element r a)
(λ x, @trans _ r _ _ _ _ x.2 h) h⟩⟩
theorem typein_surj (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r]
{o} (h : o < type r) : ∃ a, typein r a = o :=
induction_on o (λ β s _ ⟨f⟩, by exactI ⟨f.top, typein_top _⟩) h
lemma injective_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] : injective (typein r) :=
injective_of_increasing r (<) (typein r) (λ x y, (typein_lt_typein r).2)
theorem typein_inj (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r]
{a b} : typein r a = typein r b ↔ a = b :=
injective.eq_iff (injective_typein r)
/-- `enum r o h` is the `o`-th element of `α` ordered by `r`.
That is, `enum` maps an initial segment of the ordinals, those
less than the order type of `r`, to the elements of `α`. -/
def enum (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (o) : o < type r → α :=
quot.rec_on o (λ ⟨β, s, _⟩ h, (classical.choice h).top) $
λ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨h⟩, begin
resetI, refine funext (λ (H₂ : type t < type r), _),
have H₁ : type s < type r, {rwa type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩},
have : ∀ {o e} (H : o < type r), @@eq.rec
(λ (o : ordinal), o < type r → α)
(λ (h : type s < type r), (classical.choice h).top)
e H = (classical.choice H₁).top, {intros, subst e},
exact (this H₂).trans (principal_seg.top_eq h
(classical.choice H₁) (classical.choice H₂))
end
theorem enum_type {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] (f : s ≺i r)
{h : type s < type r} : enum r (type s) h = f.top :=
principal_seg.top_eq (order_iso.refl _) _ _
@[simp] theorem enum_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (a : α)
{h : typein r a < type r} : enum r (typein r a) h = a :=
enum_type (principal_seg.of_element r a)
@[simp] theorem typein_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r]
{o} (h : o < type r) : typein r (enum r o h) = o :=
let ⟨a, e⟩ := typein_surj r h in
by clear _let_match; subst e; rw enum_typein
def typein_iso (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] : r ≃o subrel (<) (< type r) :=
⟨⟨λ x, ⟨typein r x, typein_lt_type r x⟩, λ x, enum r x.1 x.2, λ y, enum_typein r y,
λ ⟨y, hy⟩, subtype.eq (typein_enum r hy)⟩,
λ a b, (typein_lt_typein r).symm⟩
theorem enum_lt {r : α → α → Prop} [is_well_order α r]
{o₁ o₂ : ordinal} (h₁ : o₁ < type r) (h₂ : o₂ < type r) :
r (enum r o₁ h₁) (enum r o₂ h₂) ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
by rw [← typein_lt_typein r, typein_enum, typein_enum]
lemma order_iso_enum' {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s]
(f : order_iso r s) (o : ordinal) : ∀(hr : o < type r) (hs : o < type s),
f (enum r o hr) = enum s o hs :=
begin
refine induction_on o _, rintros γ t wo ⟨g⟩ ⟨h⟩,
resetI, rw [enum_type g, enum_type (principal_seg.lt_equiv g f)], refl
end
lemma order_iso_enum {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s]
(f : order_iso r s) (o : ordinal) (hr : o < type r) :
f (enum r o hr) =
enum s o (by {convert hr using 1, apply quotient.sound, exact ⟨f.symm⟩ }) :=
order_iso_enum' _ _ _ _
theorem wf : @well_founded ordinal (<) :=
⟨λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r wo, by exactI
suffices ∀ a, acc (<) (typein r a), from
⟨_, λ o h, let ⟨a, e⟩ := typein_surj r h in e ▸ this a⟩,
λ a, acc.rec_on (wo.wf.apply a) $ λ x H IH, ⟨_, λ o h, begin
rcases typein_surj r (lt_trans h (typein_lt_type r _)) with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
exact IH _ ((typein_lt_typein r).1 h)
end⟩⟩
instance : has_well_founded ordinal := ⟨(<), wf⟩
/-- The cardinal of an ordinal is the cardinal of any
set with that order type. -/
def card (o : ordinal) : cardinal :=
quot.lift_on o (λ ⟨α, r, _⟩, mk α) $
λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨e⟩, quotient.sound ⟨e.to_equiv⟩
@[simp] theorem card_type (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] :
card (type r) = mk α := rfl
lemma card_typein {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : is_well_order α r] (x : α) :
mk {y // r y x} = (typein r x).card := rfl
theorem card_le_card {o₁ o₂ : ordinal} : o₁ ≤ o₂ → card o₁ ≤ card o₂ :=
induction_on o₁ $ λ α r _, induction_on o₂ $ λ β s _ ⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩⟩, ⟨f⟩
instance : has_zero ordinal :=
⟨⟦⟨pempty, empty_relation, by apply_instance⟩⟧⟩
instance : inhabited ordinal := ⟨0⟩
theorem zero_eq_type_empty : 0 = @type empty empty_relation _ :=
quotient.sound ⟨⟨empty_equiv_pempty.symm, λ _ _, iff.rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem card_zero : card 0 = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_le (o : ordinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
induction_on o $ λ α r _,
⟨⟨⟨embedding.of_not_nonempty $ λ ⟨a⟩, a.elim,
λ a, a.elim⟩, λ a, a.elim⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem le_zero {o : ordinal} : o ≤ 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, zero_le, and_true]
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : ordinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
by simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, zero_le, true_and, ne.def, eq_comm]
instance : has_one ordinal :=
⟨⟦⟨punit, empty_relation, by apply_instance⟩⟧⟩
theorem one_eq_type_unit : 1 = @type unit empty_relation _ :=
quotient.sound ⟨⟨punit_equiv_punit, λ _ _, iff.rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem card_one : card 1 = 1 := rfl
instance : has_add ordinal.{u} :=
⟨λo₁ o₂, quotient.lift_on₂ o₁ o₂
(λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, ⟦⟨α ⊕ β, sum.lex r s, by exactI sum.lex.is_well_order⟩⟧
: Well_order → Well_order → ordinal) $
λ ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩,
quot.sound ⟨order_iso.sum_lex_congr f g⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem type_add {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop)
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] : type r + type s = type (sum.lex r s) := rfl
/-- The ordinal successor is the smallest ordinal larger than `o`.
It is defined as `o + 1`. -/
def succ (o : ordinal) : ordinal := o + 1
theorem succ_eq_add_one (o) : succ o = o + 1 := rfl
theorem lt_succ_self (o : ordinal.{u}) : o < succ o :=
induction_on o $ λ α r _, ⟨⟨⟨⟨λ x, sum.inl x, λ _ _, sum.inl.inj⟩,
λ _ _, sum.lex_inl_inl.symm⟩,
sum.inr punit.star, λ b, sum.rec_on b
(λ x, ⟨λ _, ⟨x, rfl⟩, λ _, sum.lex.sep _ _ _ _⟩)
(λ x, sum.lex_inr_inr.trans ⟨false.elim, λ ⟨x, H⟩, sum.inl_ne_inr H⟩)⟩⟩
theorem succ_pos (o : ordinal) : 0 < succ o :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) (lt_succ_self _)
theorem succ_ne_zero (o : ordinal) : succ o ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt $ succ_pos o
theorem succ_le {a b : ordinal} : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_succ_self _),
induction_on a $ λ α r hr, induction_on b $ λ β s hs ⟨⟨f, t, hf⟩⟩, begin
refine ⟨⟨@order_embedding.of_monotone (α ⊕ punit) β _ _
(@sum.lex.is_well_order _ _ _ _ hr _).1.1
(@is_asymm_of_is_trans_of_is_irrefl _ _ hs.1.2.2 hs.1.2.1)
(sum.rec _ _) (λ a b, _), λ a b, _⟩⟩,
{ exact f }, { exact λ _, t },
{ rcases a with a|_; rcases b with b|_,
{ simpa only [sum.lex_inl_inl] using f.ord'.1 },
{ intro _, rw hf, exact ⟨_, rfl⟩ },
{ exact false.elim ∘ sum.lex_inr_inl },
{ exact false.elim ∘ sum.lex_inr_inr.1 } },
{ rcases a with a|_,
{ intro h, have := @principal_seg.init _ _ _ _ hs.1.2.2 ⟨f, t, hf⟩ _ _ h,
cases this with w h, exact ⟨sum.inl w, h⟩ },
{ intro h, cases (hf b).1 h with w h, exact ⟨sum.inl w, h⟩ } }
end⟩
@[simp] theorem card_add (o₁ o₂ : ordinal) : card (o₁ + o₂) = card o₁ + card o₂ :=
induction_on o₁ $ λ α r _, induction_on o₂ $ λ β s _, rfl
@[simp] theorem card_succ (o : ordinal) : card (succ o) = card o + 1 :=
by simp only [succ, card_add, card_one]
@[simp] theorem card_nat (n : ℕ) : card.{u} n = n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [card_add, card_one, nat.cast_succ, *]]
theorem nat_cast_succ (n : ℕ) : (succ n : ordinal) = n.succ := rfl
instance : add_monoid ordinal.{u} :=
{ add := (+),
zero := 0,
zero_add := λ o, induction_on o $ λ α r _, eq.symm $ quotient.sound
⟨⟨(pempty_sum α).symm, λ a b, sum.lex_inr_inr.symm⟩⟩,
add_zero := λ o, induction_on o $ λ α r _, eq.symm $ quotient.sound
⟨⟨(sum_pempty α).symm, λ a b, sum.lex_inl_inl.symm⟩⟩,
add_assoc := λ o₁ o₂ o₃, quotient.induction_on₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ $
λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩, quot.sound
⟨⟨sum_assoc _ _ _, λ a b,
begin rcases a with ⟨a|a⟩|a; rcases b with ⟨b|b⟩|b;
simp only [sum_assoc_apply_in1, sum_assoc_apply_in2, sum_assoc_apply_in3,
sum.lex_inl_inl, sum.lex_inr_inr, sum.lex.sep, sum.lex_inr_inl] end⟩⟩ }
theorem add_succ (o₁ o₂ : ordinal) : o₁ + succ o₂ = succ (o₁ + o₂) :=
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem succ_zero : succ 0 = 1 := zero_add _
theorem one_le_iff_pos {o : ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ 0 < o :=
by rw [← succ_zero, succ_le]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {o : ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
by rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem add_le_add_left {a b : ordinal} : a ≤ b → ∀ c, c + a ≤ c + b :=
induction_on a $ λ α₁ r₁ _, induction_on b $ λ α₂ r₂ _ ⟨⟨⟨f, fo⟩, fi⟩⟩ c,
induction_on c $ λ β s _,
⟨⟨⟨(embedding.refl _).sum_congr f,
λ a b, match a, b with
| sum.inl a, sum.inl b := sum.lex_inl_inl.trans sum.lex_inl_inl.symm
| sum.inl a, sum.inr b := by apply iff_of_true; apply sum.lex.sep
| sum.inr a, sum.inl b := by apply iff_of_false; exact sum.lex_inr_inl
| sum.inr a, sum.inr b := sum.lex_inr_inr.trans $ fo.trans sum.lex_inr_inr.symm
end⟩,
λ a b H, match a, b, H with
| _, sum.inl b, _ := ⟨sum.inl b, rfl⟩
| sum.inl a, sum.inr b, H := (sum.lex_inr_inl H).elim
| sum.inr a, sum.inr b, H := let ⟨w, h⟩ := fi _ _ (sum.lex_inr_inr.1 H) in
⟨sum.inr w, congr_arg sum.inr h⟩
end⟩⟩
theorem le_add_right (a b : ordinal) : a ≤ a + b :=
by simpa only [add_zero] using add_le_add_left (zero_le b) a
theorem add_le_add_iff_left (a) {b c : ordinal} : a + b ≤ a + c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨induction_on a $ λ α r hr, induction_on b $ λ β₁ s₁ hs₁, induction_on c $ λ β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩, ⟨
have fl : ∀ a, f (sum.inl a) = sum.inl a := λ a,
by simpa only [initial_seg.trans_apply, initial_seg.le_add_apply]
using @initial_seg.eq _ _ _ _ (@sum.lex.is_well_order _ _ _ _ hr hs₂)
((initial_seg.le_add r s₁).trans f) (initial_seg.le_add r s₂) a,
have ∀ b, {b' // f (sum.inr b) = sum.inr b'}, begin
intro b, cases e : f (sum.inr b),
{ rw ← fl at e, have := f.inj e, contradiction },
{ exact ⟨_, rfl⟩ }
end,
let g (b) := (this b).1 in
have fr : ∀ b, f (sum.inr b) = sum.inr (g b), from λ b, (this b).2,
⟨⟨⟨g, λ x y h, by injection f.inj
(by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (sum.inr x) = f (sum.inr y))⟩,
λ a b, by simpa only [sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, order_embedding.coe_fn_to_embedding,
initial_seg.coe_fn_to_order_embedding, function.embedding.coe_fn_mk]
using @order_embedding.ord _ _ _ _ f.to_order_embedding (sum.inr a) (sum.inr b)⟩,
λ a b H, begin
rcases f.init' (by rw fr; exact sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a'|a', h⟩,
{ rw fl at h, cases h },
{ rw fr at h, exact ⟨a', sum.inr.inj h⟩ }
end⟩⟩,
λ h, add_le_add_left h _⟩
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
/-- The universe lift operation for ordinals, which embeds `ordinal.{u}` as
a proper initial segment of `ordinal.{v}` for `v > u`. -/
def lift (o : ordinal.{u}) : ordinal.{max u v} :=
quotient.lift_on o (λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩,
@type _ _ (@order_embedding.is_well_order _ _ (@equiv.ulift.{u v} α ⁻¹'o r) r
(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift.{u v} r) wo)) $
λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨f⟩,
quot.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).trans $
f.trans (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s).symm⟩
theorem lift_type {α} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] :
∃ wo', lift (type r) = @type _ (@equiv.ulift.{u v} α ⁻¹'o r) wo' :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem lift_umax : lift.{u (max u v)} = lift.{u v} :=
funext $ λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r _,
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).trans (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).symm⟩
theorem lift_id' (a : ordinal) : lift a = a :=
induction_on a $ λ α r _,
quotient.sound ⟨order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_id : ∀ a, lift.{u u} a = a := lift_id'.{u u}
@[simp] theorem lift_lift (a : ordinal) : lift.{(max u v) w} (lift.{u v} a) = lift.{u (max v w)} a :=
induction_on a $ λ α r _,
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans $
(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).symm⟩
theorem lift_type_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
lift.{u (max v w)} (type r) ≤ lift.{v (max u w)} (type s) ↔ nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).symm).trans $
f.trans (initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s))⟩,
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r)).trans $
f.trans (initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s).symm)⟩⟩
theorem lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
lift.{u (max v w)} (type r) = lift.{v (max u w)} (type s) ↔ nonempty (r ≃o s) :=
quotient.eq.trans
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).symm.trans $
f.trans (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s)⟩,
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).trans $
f.trans (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s).symm⟩⟩
theorem lift_type_lt {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
lift.{u (max v w)} (type r) < lift.{v (max u w)} (type s) ↔ nonempty (r ≺i s) :=
by haveI := @order_embedding.is_well_order _ _ (@equiv.ulift.{u (max v w)} α ⁻¹'o r)
r (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift.{u (max v w)} r) _;
haveI := @order_embedding.is_well_order _ _ (@equiv.ulift.{v (max u w)} β ⁻¹'o s)
s (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift.{v (max u w)} s) _; exact
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(f.equiv_lt (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).symm).lt_le
(initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s))⟩,
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(f.equiv_lt (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r)).lt_le
(initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s).symm)⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_le {a b : ordinal} : lift.{u v} a ≤ lift b ↔ a ≤ b :=
induction_on a $ λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _,
by rw ← lift_umax; exactI lift_type_le
@[simp] theorem lift_inj {a b : ordinal} : lift a = lift b ↔ a = b :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, lift_le]
@[simp] theorem lift_lt {a b : ordinal} : lift a < lift b ↔ a < b :=
by simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, lift_le]
@[simp] theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 :=
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
⟨pempty_equiv_pempty, λ a b, iff.rfl⟩⟩
theorem zero_eq_lift_type_empty : 0 = lift.{0 u} (@type empty empty_relation _) :=
by rw [← zero_eq_type_empty, lift_zero]
@[simp] theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
⟨punit_equiv_punit, λ a b, iff.rfl⟩⟩
theorem one_eq_lift_type_unit : 1 = lift.{0 u} (@type unit empty_relation _) :=
by rw [← one_eq_type_unit, lift_one]
@[simp] theorem lift_add (a b) : lift (a + b) = lift a + lift b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
(order_iso.sum_lex_congr (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)
(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_succ (a) : lift (succ a) = succ (lift a) :=
by unfold succ; simp only [lift_add, lift_one]
@[simp] theorem lift_card (a) : (card a).lift = card (lift a) :=
induction_on a $ λ α r _, rfl
theorem lift_down' {a : cardinal.{u}} {b : ordinal.{max u v}}
(h : card b ≤ a.lift) : ∃ a', lift a' = b :=
let ⟨c, e⟩ := cardinal.lift_down h in
quotient.induction_on c (λ α, induction_on b $ λ β s _ e', begin
resetI,
rw [mk_def, card_type, ← cardinal.lift_id'.{(max u v) u} (mk β),
← cardinal.lift_umax.{u v}, lift_mk_eq.{u (max u v) (max u v)}] at e',
cases e' with f,
have g := order_iso.preimage f s,
haveI := g.to_order_embedding.is_well_order,
have := lift_type_eq.{u (max u v) (max u v)}.2 ⟨g⟩,
rw [lift_id, lift_umax.{u v}] at this,
exact ⟨_, this⟩
end) e
theorem lift_down {a : ordinal.{u}} {b : ordinal.{max u v}}
(h : b ≤ lift a) : ∃ a', lift a' = b :=
@lift_down' (card a) _ (by rw lift_card; exact card_le_card h)
theorem le_lift_iff {a : ordinal.{u}} {b : ordinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift a ↔ ∃ a', lift a' = b ∧ a' ≤ a :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h in ⟨a', e, lift_le.1 $ e.symm ▸ h⟩,
λ ⟨a', e, h⟩, e ▸ lift_le.2 h⟩
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : ordinal.{u}} {b : ordinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift a ↔ ∃ a', lift a' = b ∧ a' < a :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down (le_of_lt h) in
⟨a', e, lift_lt.1 $ e.symm ▸ h⟩,
λ ⟨a', e, h⟩, e ▸ lift_lt.2 h⟩
/-- `ω` is the first infinite ordinal, defined as the order type of `ℕ`. -/
def omega : ordinal.{u} := lift $ @type ℕ (<) _
localized "notation `ω` := ordinal.omega.{0}" in ordinal
theorem card_omega : card omega = cardinal.omega := rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_omega : lift omega = omega := lift_lift _
theorem add_le_add_right {a b : ordinal} : a ≤ b → ∀ c, a + c ≤ b + c :=
induction_on a $ λ α₁ r₁ hr₁, induction_on b $ λ α₂ r₂ hr₂ ⟨⟨⟨f, fo⟩, fi⟩⟩ c,
induction_on c $ λ β s hs, (@type_le' _ _ _ _
(@sum.lex.is_well_order _ _ _ _ hr₁ hs)
(@sum.lex.is_well_order _ _ _ _ hr₂ hs)).2
⟨⟨embedding.sum_congr f (embedding.refl _), λ a b, begin
split; intro H,
{ cases H; constructor; [rwa ← fo, assumption] },
{ cases a with a a; cases b with b b; cases H; constructor; [rwa fo, assumption] }
end⟩⟩
theorem le_add_left (a b : ordinal) : a ≤ b + a :=
by simpa only [zero_add] using add_le_add_right (zero_le b) a
theorem le_total (a b : ordinal) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le (le_add_left b a), lt_or_eq_of_le (le_add_right a b) with
| or.inr h, _ := by rw h; exact or.inl (le_add_right _ _)
| _, or.inr h := by rw h; exact or.inr (le_add_left _ _)
| or.inl h₁, or.inl h₂ := induction_on a (λ α₁ r₁ _,
induction_on b $ λ α₂ r₂ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩, begin
resetI,
rw [← typein_top f, ← typein_top g, le_iff_lt_or_eq,
le_iff_lt_or_eq, typein_lt_typein, typein_lt_typein],
rcases trichotomous_of (sum.lex r₁ r₂) g.top f.top with h|h|h;
[exact or.inl (or.inl h), {left, right, rw h}, exact or.inr (or.inl h)]
end) h₁ h₂
end
instance : decidable_linear_order ordinal :=
{ le_total := le_total,
decidable_le := classical.dec_rel _,
..ordinal.partial_order }
@[simp] lemma typein_le_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] {x x' : α} :
typein r x ≤ typein r x' ↔ ¬r x' x :=
by rw [←not_lt, typein_lt_typein]
lemma enum_le_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] {o o' : ordinal}
(ho : o < type r) (ho' : o' < type r) : ¬r (enum r o' ho') (enum r o ho) ↔ o ≤ o' :=
by rw [←@not_lt _ _ o' o, enum_lt ho']
theorem lt_succ {a b : ordinal} : a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_le, succ_le, not_lt]
theorem add_lt_add_iff_left (a) {b c : ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c :=
by rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_right {a b c : ordinal} : a + b < c + b → a < c :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h, add_le_add_right h _)
@[simp] theorem succ_lt_succ {a b : ordinal} : succ a < succ b ↔ a < b :=
by rw [lt_succ, succ_le]
@[simp] theorem succ_le_succ {a b : ordinal} : succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 succ_lt_succ
theorem succ_inj {a b : ordinal} : succ a = succ b ↔ a = b :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, succ_le_succ]
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b :=
by induction n with n ih; [rw [nat.cast_zero, add_zero, add_zero],
rw [← nat_cast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ, ih]]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero {o} : card o = 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
⟨induction_on o $ λ α r _ h, begin
refine le_antisymm (le_of_not_lt $
λ hn, ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 _ h) (zero_le _),
rw [← succ_le, succ_zero] at hn, cases hn with f,
exact ⟨f punit.star⟩
end, λ e, by simp only [e, card_zero]⟩
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [is_well_order α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ nonempty α :=
(not_congr (@card_eq_zero (type r))).symm.trans ne_zero_iff_nonempty
@[simp] theorem type_eq_zero_iff_empty [is_well_order α r] : type r = 0 ↔ ¬ nonempty α :=
(not_iff_comm.1 type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty).symm
instance : zero_ne_one_class ordinal.{u} :=
{ zero := 0, one := 1, zero_ne_one :=
ne.symm $ type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 ⟨punit.star⟩ }
theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ordinal) < 1 :=
lt_iff_le_and_ne.2 ⟨zero_le _, zero_ne_one⟩
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : ordinal.{u}) : ordinal.{u} :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then classical.some h else o
@[simp] theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o :=
by have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_inj.1 $ classical.some_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then let ⟨a, e⟩ := h in
by rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨λ e ⟨a, e'⟩, by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact ne_of_lt (lt_succ_self _) e,
λ h, dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨λ e, ⟨_, e.symm⟩, λ ⟨a, e⟩, by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o} (h : ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a) {b} : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨lt_trans (lt_succ_self _), λ l,
lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le.2 l) (λ e, h ⟨_, e.symm⟩)⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then let ⟨c, e⟩ := h in
by rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp] theorem lift_is_succ {o} : (∃ a, lift o = succ a) ↔ (∃ a, o = succ a) :=
⟨λ ⟨a, h⟩,
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down $ show a ≤ lift o, from le_of_lt $
h.symm ▸ lt_succ_self _ in
⟨b, lift_inj.1 $ by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
λ ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨lift a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_pred (o) : lift (pred o) = pred (lift o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then
by cases h with a e; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h,
pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor. -/
def is_limit (o : ordinal) : Prop := o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
theorem not_zero_is_limit : ¬ is_limit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ := h rfl
theorem not_succ_is_limit (o) : ¬ is_limit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ := lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ_self _))
theorem not_succ_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ := not_succ_is_limit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨lt_trans (lt_succ_self _), h.2 _⟩
theorem le_succ_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 $ succ_lt_of_is_limit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨λ h x l, le_trans (le_of_lt l) h,
λ H, (le_succ_of_is_limit h).1 $ le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ_self _)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x :=
by simpa only [not_ball, not_le] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp] theorem lift_is_limit (o) : is_limit (lift o) ↔ is_limit o :=
and_congr (not_congr $ by simpa only [lift_zero] using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨λ H a h, lift_lt.1 $ by simpa only [lift_succ] using H _ (lift_lt.2 h),
λ H a h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down (le_of_lt h) in
by rw [← e, ← lift_succ, lift_lt];
rw [← e, lift_lt] at h; exact H a' h⟩
theorem is_limit.pos {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) h.1.symm
theorem is_limit.one_lt {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : 1 < o :=
by simpa only [succ_zero] using h.2 _ h.pos
theorem is_limit.nat_lt {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ordinal) < o
| 0 := h.pos
| (n+1) := h.2 _ (is_limit.nat_lt n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : ordinal) :
o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ is_limit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then or.inl o0 else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then or.inr (or.inl h) else
or.inr $ or.inr ⟨o0, λ a, (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
instance : is_well_order ordinal (<) := ⟨wf⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator] def limit_rec_on {C : ordinal → Sort*}
(o : ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, is_limit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
wf.fix (λ o IH,
if o0 : o = 0 then by rw o0; exact H₁ else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then
by rw ← succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h; exact
H₂ _ (IH _ $ pred_lt_iff_is_succ.2 h)
else H₃ _ ⟨o0, λ a, (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩ IH) o
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limit_rec_on C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
by rw [limit_rec_on, well_founded.fix_eq, dif_pos rfl]; refl
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limit_rec_on C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limit_rec_on C o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
begin
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩,
rw [limit_rec_on, well_founded.fix_eq,
dif_neg (succ_ne_zero o), dif_pos h],
generalize : limit_rec_on._proof_2 (succ o) h = h₂,
generalize : limit_rec_on._proof_3 (succ o) h = h₃,
revert h₂ h₃, generalize e : pred (succ o) = o', intros,
rw pred_succ at e, subst o', refl
end
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limit_rec_on C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h (λ x h, @limit_rec_on C x H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
by rw [limit_rec_on, well_founded.fix_eq,
dif_neg h.1, dif_neg (not_succ_of_is_limit h)]; refl
lemma has_succ_of_is_limit {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : is_well_order α r]
(h : (type r).is_limit) (x : α) : ∃y, r x y :=
begin
use enum r (typein r x).succ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type r x)),
convert (enum_lt (typein_lt_type r x) _).mpr (lt_succ_self _), rw [enum_typein]
end
lemma type_subrel_lt (o : ordinal.{u}) :
type (subrel (<) {o' : ordinal | o' < o}) = ordinal.lift.{u u+1} o :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on o _,
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩, resetI, apply quotient.sound,
constructor, symmetry, refine (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).trans (typein_iso r)
end
lemma mk_initial_seg (o : ordinal.{u}) :
#{o' : ordinal | o' < o} = cardinal.lift.{u u+1} o.card :=
by rw [lift_card, ←type_subrel_lt, card_type]
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous. -/
def is_normal (f : ordinal → ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, is_limit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem is_normal.limit_le {f} (H : is_normal f) : ∀ {o}, is_limit o →
∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a := H.2
theorem is_normal.limit_lt {f} (H : is_normal f) {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 $ by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem is_normal.lt_iff {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
strict_mono.lt_iff_lt $ λ a b,
limit_rec_on b (not.elim (not_lt_of_le $ zero_le _))
(λ b IH h, (lt_or_eq_of_le (lt_succ.1 h)).elim
(λ h, lt_trans (IH h) (H.1 _))
(λ e, e ▸ H.1 _))
(λ b l IH h, lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a)
((H.2 _ l _).1 (le_refl _) _ (l.2 _ h)))
theorem is_normal.le_iff {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem is_normal.inj {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem is_normal.le_self {f} (H : is_normal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
limit_rec_on a (zero_le _)
(λ a IH, succ_le.2 $ lt_of_le_of_lt IH (H.1 _))
(λ a l IH, (limit_le l).2 $ λ b h,
le_trans (IH b h) $ H.le_iff.2 $ le_of_lt h)
theorem is_normal.le_set {f} (H : is_normal f) (p : ordinal → Prop)
(p0 : ∃ x, p x) (S)
(H₂ : ∀ o, S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → a ≤ o) {o} :
f S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → f a ≤ o :=
⟨λ h a pa, le_trans (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 (le_refl _) _ pa)) h,
λ h, begin
revert H₂, apply limit_rec_on S,
{ intro H₂,
cases p0 with x px,
have := le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (zero_le _) _ px),
rw this at px, exact h _ px },
{ intros S _ H₂,
rcases not_ball.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 $ not_le_of_lt $ lt_succ_self _) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact le_trans (H.le_iff.2 $ succ_le.2 $ not_le.1 h₂) (h _ h₁) },
{ intros S L _ H₂, apply (H.2 _ L _).2, intros a h',
rcases not_ball.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 (not_le.2 h')) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact le_trans (H.le_iff.2 $ le_of_lt $ not_le.1 h₂) (h _ h₁) }
end⟩
theorem is_normal.le_set' {f} (H : is_normal f) (p : α → Prop) (g : α → ordinal)
(p0 : ∃ x, p x) (S)
(H₂ : ∀ o, S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → g a ≤ o) {o} :
f S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → f (g a) ≤ o :=
(H.le_set (λ x, ∃ y, p y ∧ x = g y)
(let ⟨x, px⟩ := p0 in ⟨_, _, px, rfl⟩) _
(λ o, (H₂ o).trans ⟨λ H a ⟨y, h1, h2⟩, h2.symm ▸ H y h1,
λ H a h1, H (g a) ⟨a, h1, rfl⟩⟩)).trans
⟨λ H a h, H (g a) ⟨a, h, rfl⟩, λ H a ⟨y, h1, h2⟩, h2.symm ▸ H y h1⟩
theorem is_normal.refl : is_normal id :=
⟨λ x, lt_succ_self _, λ o l a, limit_le l⟩
theorem is_normal.trans {f g} (H₁ : is_normal f) (H₂ : is_normal g) :
is_normal (λ x, f (g x)) :=
⟨λ x, H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _),
λ o l a, H₁.le_set' (< o) g ⟨_, l.pos⟩ _ (λ c, H₂.2 _ l _)⟩
theorem is_normal.is_limit {f} (H : is_normal f) {o} (l : is_limit o) :
is_limit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt $ lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) $ H.lt_iff.2 l.pos,
λ a h, let ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h in
lt_of_le_of_lt (succ_le.2 h₂) (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal.{u}}
(h : is_limit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨λ h b' l, le_trans (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt l) _) h,
λ H, le_of_not_lt $
induction_on a (λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _ h H l, begin
resetI,
suffices : ∀ x : β, sum.lex r s (sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l),
{ cases enum _ _ l with x x,
{ cases this (enum s 0 h.pos) },
{ exact irrefl _ (this _) } },
intros x,
rw [← typein_lt_typein (sum.lex r s), typein_enum],
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x)),
rw [add_succ, succ_le] at this,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (type_le'.2
⟨order_embedding.of_monotone (λ a, _) (λ a b, _)⟩) this,
{ rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩,
{ exact sum.inl a },
{ exact sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩ } },
{ rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩; rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩; cases h₁; cases h₂;
rintro ⟨⟩; constructor; assumption }
end) h H⟩
theorem add_is_normal (a : ordinal) : is_normal ((+) a) :=
⟨λ b, (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ_self _),
λ b l c, add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem add_is_limit (a) {b} : is_limit b → is_limit (a + b) :=
(add_is_normal a).is_limit
def typein.principal_seg {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] :
@principal_seg α ordinal.{u} r (<) :=
⟨order_embedding.of_monotone (typein r)
(λ a b, (typein_lt_typein r).2), type r, λ b,
⟨λ h, ⟨enum r _ h, typein_enum r h⟩,
λ ⟨a, e⟩, e ▸ typein_lt_type _ _⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem typein.principal_seg_coe (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] :
(typein.principal_seg r : α → ordinal) = typein r := rfl
/-- The minimal element of a nonempty family of ordinals -/
def min {ι} (I : nonempty ι) (f : ι → ordinal) : ordinal :=
wf.min (set.range f) (let ⟨i⟩ := I in ⟨_, set.mem_range_self i⟩)
theorem min_eq {ι} (I) (f : ι → ordinal) : ∃ i, min I f = f i :=
let ⟨i, e⟩ := wf.min_mem (set.range f) _ in ⟨i, e.symm⟩
theorem min_le {ι I} (f : ι → ordinal) (i) : min I f ≤ f i :=
le_of_not_gt $ wf.not_lt_min (set.range f) _ (set.mem_range_self i)
theorem le_min {ι I} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : a ≤ min I f ↔ ∀ i, a ≤ f i :=
⟨λ h i, le_trans h (min_le _ _),
λ h, let ⟨i, e⟩ := min_eq I f in e.symm ▸ h i⟩
/-- The minimal element of a nonempty set of ordinals -/
def omin (S : set ordinal.{u}) (H : ∃ x, x ∈ S) : ordinal.{u} :=
@min.{(u+2) u} S (let ⟨x, px⟩ := H in ⟨⟨x, px⟩⟩) subtype.val
theorem omin_mem (S H) : omin S H ∈ S :=
let ⟨⟨i, h⟩, e⟩ := @min_eq S _ _ in
(show omin S H = i, from e).symm ▸ h
theorem le_omin {S H a} : a ≤ omin S H ↔ ∀ i ∈ S, a ≤ i :=
le_min.trans set_coe.forall
theorem omin_le {S H i} (h : i ∈ S) : omin S H ≤ i :=
le_omin.1 (le_refl _) _ h
@[simp] theorem lift_min {ι} (I) (f : ι → ordinal) : lift (min I f) = min I (lift ∘ f) :=
le_antisymm (le_min.2 $ λ a, lift_le.2 $ min_le _ a) $
let ⟨i, e⟩ := min_eq I (lift ∘ f) in
by rw e; exact lift_le.2 (le_min.2 $ λ j, lift_le.1 $
by have := min_le (lift ∘ f) j; rwa e at this)
def lift.initial_seg : @initial_seg ordinal.{u} ordinal.{max u v} (<) (<) :=
⟨⟨⟨lift.{u v}, λ a b, lift_inj.1⟩, λ a b, lift_lt.symm⟩,
λ a b h, lift_down (le_of_lt h)⟩
@[simp] theorem lift.initial_seg_coe : (lift.initial_seg : ordinal → ordinal) = lift := rfl
/-- `univ.{u v}` is the order type of the ordinals of `Type u` as a member
of `ordinal.{v}` (when `u < v`). It is an inaccessible cardinal. -/
def univ := lift.{(u+1) v} (@type ordinal.{u} (<) _)
theorem univ_id : univ.{u (u+1)} = @type ordinal.{u} (<) _ := lift_id _
@[simp] theorem lift_univ : lift.{_ w} univ.{u v} = univ.{u (max v w)} := lift_lift _
theorem univ_umax : univ.{u (max (u+1) v)} = univ.{u v} := congr_fun lift_umax _
def lift.principal_seg : @principal_seg ordinal.{u} ordinal.{max (u+1) v} (<) (<) :=
⟨↑lift.initial_seg.{u (max (u+1) v)}, univ.{u v}, begin
refine λ b, induction_on b _, introsI β s _,
rw [univ, ← lift_umax], split; intro h,
{ rw ← lift_id (type s) at h ⊢,
cases lift_type_lt.1 h with f, cases f with f a hf,
existsi a, revert hf,
apply induction_on a, intros α r _ hf,
refine lift_type_eq.{u (max (u+1) v) (max (u+1) v)}.2
⟨(order_iso.of_surjective (order_embedding.of_monotone _ _) _).symm⟩,
{ exact λ b, enum r (f b) ((hf _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩) },
{ refine λ a b h, (typein_lt_typein r).1 _,
rw [typein_enum, typein_enum],
exact f.ord'.1 h },
{ intro a', cases (hf _).1 (typein_lt_type _ a') with b e,
existsi b, simp, simp [e] } },
{ cases h with a e, rw [← e],
apply induction_on a, intros α r _,
exact lift_type_lt.{u (u+1) (max (u+1) v)}.2
⟨typein.principal_seg r⟩ }
end⟩
@[simp] theorem lift.principal_seg_coe :
(lift.principal_seg.{u v} : ordinal → ordinal) = lift.{u (max (u+1) v)} := rfl
@[simp] theorem lift.principal_seg_top : lift.principal_seg.top = univ := rfl
theorem lift.principal_seg_top' :
lift.principal_seg.{u (u+1)}.top = @type ordinal.{u} (<) _ :=
by simp only [lift.principal_seg_top, univ_id]
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying
`b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
def sub (a b : ordinal.{u}) : ordinal.{u} :=
omin {o | a ≤ b+o} ⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
instance : has_sub ordinal := ⟨sub⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
omin_mem {o | a ≤ b+o} _
theorem sub_le {a b c : ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨λ h, le_trans (le_add_sub a b) (add_le_add_left h _),
λ h, omin_le h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 $ le_refl _)
((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 $ le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 $ le_add_left _ _
theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
le_antisymm begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a-b) with e|⟨c,e⟩|l,
{ simp only [e, add_zero, h] },
{ rw [e, add_succ, succ_le, ← lt_sub, e], apply lt_succ_self },
{ exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 (λ c l, le_of_lt (lt_sub.1 l)) }
end (le_add_sub _ _)
@[simp] theorem sub_zero (a : ordinal) : a - 0 = a :=
by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp] theorem zero_sub (a : ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 :=
by rw ← le_zero; apply sub_le_self
@[simp] theorem sub_self (a : ordinal) : a - a = 0 :=
by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b,
λ h, by rwa [← le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
theorem sub_sub (a b c : ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ d, by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c :=
by rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem sub_is_limit {a b} (l : is_limit a) (h : b < a) : is_limit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt $ lt_sub.2 $ by rwa add_zero,
λ c h, by rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
@[simp] theorem one_add_omega : 1 + omega.{u} = omega :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (le_add_left _ _),
rw [omega, one_eq_lift_type_unit, ← lift_add, lift_le, type_add],
have : is_well_order unit empty_relation := by apply_instance,
refine ⟨order_embedding.collapse (order_embedding.of_monotone _ _)⟩,
{ apply sum.rec, exact λ _, 0, exact nat.succ },
{ intros a b, cases a; cases b; intro H; cases H with _ _ H _ _ H;
[cases H, exact nat.succ_pos _, exact nat.succ_lt_succ H] }
end
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : omega ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
by rw [← add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
instance : monoid ordinal.{u} :=
{ mul := λ a b, quotient.lift_on₂ a b
(λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, ⟦⟨β × α, prod.lex s r, by exactI prod.lex.is_well_order⟩⟧
: Well_order → Well_order → ordinal) $
λ ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩,
quot.sound ⟨order_iso.prod_lex_congr g f⟩,
one := 1,
mul_assoc := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩,
eq.symm $ quotient.sound ⟨⟨prod_assoc _ _ _, λ a b, begin
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩,
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩,
simp [prod.lex_def, and_or_distrib_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]
end⟩⟩,
mul_one := λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r _, quotient.sound
⟨⟨punit_prod _, λ a b, by rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩;
simp only [prod.lex_def, empty_relation, false_or]; dsimp only;
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]; refl⟩⟩,
one_mul := λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r _, quotient.sound
⟨⟨prod_punit _, λ a b, by rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩;
simp only [prod.lex_def, empty_relation, and_false, or_false]; refl⟩⟩ }
@[simp] theorem type_mul {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop)
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] : type r * type s = type (prod.lex s r) := rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_mul (a b) : lift (a * b) = lift a * lift b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
(order_iso.prod_lex_congr (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)
(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
mul_comm (mk β) (mk α)
@[simp] theorem mul_zero (a : ordinal) : a * 0 = 0 :=
induction_on a $ λ α _ _, by exactI
type_eq_zero_iff_empty.2 (λ ⟨⟨e, _⟩⟩, e.elim)
@[simp] theorem zero_mul (a : ordinal) : 0 * a = 0 :=
induction_on a $ λ α _ _, by exactI
type_eq_zero_iff_empty.2 (λ ⟨⟨_, e⟩⟩, e.elim)
theorem mul_add (a b c : ordinal) : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨⟨sum_prod_distrib _ _ _, begin
rintro ⟨a₁|a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁|b₁, b₂⟩; simp only [prod.lex_def,
sum.lex_inl_inl, sum.lex.sep, sum.lex_inr_inl, sum.lex_inr_inr,
sum_prod_distrib_apply_left, sum_prod_distrib_apply_right];
simp only [sum.inl.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]
end⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_add_one (a b : ordinal) : a * (b + 1) = a * b + a :=
by simp only [mul_add, mul_one]
@[simp] theorem mul_succ (a b : ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a := mul_add_one _ _
theorem mul_le_mul_left {a b} (c : ordinal) : a ≤ b → c * a ≤ c * b :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩, begin
resetI,
refine type_le'.2 ⟨order_embedding.of_monotone
(λ a, (f a.1, a.2))
(λ a b h, _)⟩, clear_,
cases h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h',
{ exact prod.lex.left _ _ _ (f.to_order_embedding.ord'.1 h') },
{ exact prod.lex.right _ _ h' }
end
theorem mul_le_mul_right {a b} (c : ordinal) : a ≤ b → a * c ≤ b * c :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩, begin
resetI,
refine type_le'.2 ⟨order_embedding.of_monotone
(λ a, (a.1, f a.2))
(λ a b h, _)⟩,
cases h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h',
{ exact prod.lex.left _ _ _ h' },
{ exact prod.lex.right _ _ (f.to_order_embedding.ord'.1 h') }
end
theorem mul_le_mul {a b c d : ordinal} (h₁ : a ≤ c) (h₂ : b ≤ d) : a * b ≤ c * d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ h₂) (mul_le_mul_right _ h₁)
private lemma mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s]
{c} (h : is_limit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c)
(l : c < type r * type s) : false :=
begin
suffices : ∀ a b, prod.lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l),
{ cases enum _ _ l with b a, exact irrefl _ (this _ _) },
intros a b,
rw [← typein_lt_typein (prod.lex s r), typein_enum],
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b)),
rw [mul_succ] at this,
have := lt_of_lt_of_le ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2
(typein_lt_type _ a)) this,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ this,
refine (type_le'.2 _),
constructor,
refine order_embedding.of_monotone (λ a, _) (λ a b, _),
{ rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩,
by_cases e : b = b',
{ refine sum.inr ⟨a', _⟩,
subst e, cases h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact (irrefl _ h).elim },
{ exact h } },
{ refine sum.inl (⟨b', _⟩, a'),
cases h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact h }, { exact (e rfl).elim } } },
{ rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩,
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩,
intro h, by_cases e₁ : b = b₁; by_cases e₂ : b = b₂,
{ substs b₁ b₂, simpa only [subrel_val, prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or, eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, sum.lex_inr_inr] using h },
{ subst b₁, simp only [subrel_val, prod.lex_def, e₂, prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true, or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢,
cases h₂; [exact asymm h h₂_h, exact e₂ rfl] },
{ simp only [e₂, dif_pos, eq_self_iff_true, dif_neg e₁, not_false_iff, sum.lex.sep] },
{ simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, prod.lex_def, subrel_val, subtype.mk_eq_mk, sum.lex_inl_inl] using h } }
end
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal.{u}}
(h : is_limit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨λ h b' l, le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ (le_of_lt l)) h,
λ H, le_of_not_lt $ induction_on a (λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _,
by exactI mul_le_of_limit_aux) h H⟩
theorem mul_is_normal {a : ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : is_normal ((*) a) :=
⟨λ b, by rw mul_succ; simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a*b)).2 h,
λ b l c, mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : ordinal.{u}}
(h : is_limit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' :=
by simpa only [not_ball, not_le] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : ordinal}
(h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b :=
by simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 :=
by simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : ordinal}
(h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (λ h', mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_left_inj {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).inj
theorem mul_is_limit {a b : ordinal}
(a0 : 0 < a) : is_limit b → is_limit (a * b) :=
(mul_is_normal a0).is_limit
theorem mul_is_limit_left {a b : ordinal}
(l : is_limit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : is_limit (a * b) :=
begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with rfl|⟨b,rfl⟩|lb,
{ exact (lt_irrefl _).elim b0 },
{ rw mul_succ, exact add_is_limit _ l },
{ exact mul_is_limit l.pos lb }
end
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
protected def div (a b : ordinal.{u}) : ordinal.{u} :=
if h : b = 0 then 0 else
omin {o | a < b * succ o} ⟨a, succ_le.1 $
by simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using mul_le_mul_right (succ a) (succ_le.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h))⟩
instance : has_div ordinal := ⟨ordinal.div⟩
@[simp] theorem div_zero (a : ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 := dif_pos rfl
@[nolint def_lemma doc_blame] -- TODO: This should be a theorem but Lean fails to synthesize the placeholder
def div_def (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) :
a / b = omin {o | a < b * succ o} _ := dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) :=
by rw div_def a h; exact omin_mem {o | a < b * succ o} _
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b :=
by simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨λ h, lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_mul_succ_div a b0) (mul_le_mul_left _ $ succ_le_succ.2 h),
λ h, by rw div_def a b0; exact omin_le h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_le, div_le c0, not_lt]
theorem le_div {a b c : ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) :
a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on a,
{ simp only [mul_zero, zero_le] },
{ intros, rw [succ_le, lt_div c0] },
{ simp only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, iff_self, forall_true_iff] {contextual := tt} }
end
theorem div_lt {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) :
a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, zero_le] else
(div_le b0).2 $ lt_of_le_of_lt h $
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ_self _) (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp] theorem zero_div (a : ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
le_zero.1 $ div_le_of_le_mul $ zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 (le_refl _)
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply (div_le b0).2,
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left],
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0 },
{ rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left],
apply mul_div_le }
end
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 :=
by rw [← le_zero, div_le $ pos_iff_ne_zero.1 $ lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) h];
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
@[simp] theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a :=
by simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
@[simp] theorem div_one (a : ordinal) : a / 1 = a :=
by simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a one_ne_zero
@[simp] theorem div_self {a : ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 :=
by simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self] else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ d,
by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem is_limit_add_iff {a b} : is_limit (a + b) ↔ is_limit b ∨ (b = 0 ∧ is_limit a) :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ by_cases h' : b = 0,
{ rw [h', add_zero] at h, right, exact ⟨h', h⟩ },
left, rw [←add_sub_cancel a b], apply sub_is_limit h,
suffices : a + 0 < a + b, simpa only [add_zero],
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, pos_iff_ne_zero] },
rcases h with h|⟨rfl, h⟩, exact add_is_limit a h, simpa only [add_zero]
end
/-- Divisibility is defined by right multiplication:
`a ∣ b` if there exists `c` such that `b = a * c`. -/
instance : has_dvd ordinal := ⟨λ a b, ∃ c, b = a * c⟩
theorem dvd_def {a b : ordinal} : a ∣ b ↔ ∃ c, b = a * c := iff.rfl
theorem dvd_mul (a b : ordinal) : a ∣ a * b := ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem dvd_trans : ∀ {a b c : ordinal}, a ∣ b → b ∣ c → a ∣ c
| a _ _ ⟨b, rfl⟩ ⟨c, rfl⟩ := ⟨b * c, mul_assoc _ _ _⟩
theorem dvd_mul_of_dvd {a b : ordinal} (c) (h : a ∣ b) : a ∣ b * c :=
dvd_trans h (dvd_mul _ _)
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a _ c ⟨b, rfl⟩ :=
⟨λ ⟨d, e⟩, ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩,
λ ⟨d, e⟩, by rw [e, ← mul_add]; apply dvd_mul⟩
theorem dvd_add {a b c : ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) : a ∣ c → a ∣ b + c :=
(dvd_add_iff h₁).2
theorem dvd_zero (a : ordinal) : a ∣ 0 := ⟨_, (mul_zero _).symm⟩
theorem zero_dvd {a : ordinal} : 0 ∣ a ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨λ ⟨h, e⟩, by simp only [e, zero_mul], λ e, e.symm ▸ dvd_zero _⟩
theorem one_dvd (a : ordinal) : 1 ∣ a := ⟨a, (one_mul _).symm⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a _ a0 ⟨b, rfl⟩ := by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
| a _ b0 ⟨b, rfl⟩ := by simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul_left a
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 (λ h : b = 0, by simpa only [h, mul_zero] using b0))
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (zero_dvd.1 h₁).symm else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact zero_dvd.1 h₂ else
le_antisymm (le_of_dvd b0 h₁) (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance : has_mod ordinal := ⟨λ a b, a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mod_zero (a : ordinal) : a % 0 = a :=
by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a :=
by simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp] theorem zero_mod (b : ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 :=
by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
add_sub_cancel_of_le $ mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 $
by rw div_add_mod; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp] theorem mod_self (a : ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod] else
by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
@[simp] theorem mod_one (a : ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 :=
by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
end ordinal
namespace cardinal
open ordinal
/-- The ordinal corresponding to a cardinal `c` is the least ordinal
whose cardinal is `c`. -/
def ord (c : cardinal) : ordinal :=
begin
let ι := λ α, {r // is_well_order α r},
have : Π α, ι α := λ α, ⟨well_ordering_rel, by apply_instance⟩,
let F := λ α, ordinal.min ⟨this _⟩ (λ i:ι α, ⟦⟨α, i.1, i.2⟩⟧),
refine quot.lift_on c F _,
suffices : ∀ {α β}, α ≈ β → F α ≤ F β,
from λ α β h, le_antisymm (this h) (this (setoid.symm h)),
intros α β h, cases h with f, refine ordinal.le_min.2 (λ i, _),
haveI := @order_embedding.is_well_order _ _
(f ⁻¹'o i.1) _ ↑(order_iso.preimage f i.1) i.2,
rw ← show type (f ⁻¹'o i.1) = ⟦⟨β, i.1, i.2⟩⟧, from
quot.sound ⟨order_iso.preimage f i.1⟩,
exact ordinal.min_le (λ i:ι α, ⟦⟨α, i.1, i.2⟩⟧) ⟨_, _⟩
end
@[nolint def_lemma doc_blame] -- TODO: This should be a theorem but Lean fails to synthesize the placeholder
def ord_eq_min (α : Type u) : ord (mk α) =
@ordinal.min _ _ (λ i:{r // is_well_order α r}, ⟦⟨α, i.1, i.2⟩⟧) := rfl
theorem ord_eq (α) : ∃ (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : is_well_order α r],
ord (mk α) = @type α r wo :=
let ⟨⟨r, wo⟩, h⟩ := @ordinal.min_eq {r // is_well_order α r}
⟨⟨well_ordering_rel, by apply_instance⟩⟩
(λ i:{r // is_well_order α r}, ⟦⟨α, i.1, i.2⟩⟧) in
⟨r, wo, h⟩
theorem ord_le_type (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] : ord (mk α) ≤ ordinal.type r :=
@ordinal.min_le {r // is_well_order α r}
⟨⟨well_ordering_rel, by apply_instance⟩⟩
(λ i:{r // is_well_order α r}, ⟦⟨α, i.1, i.2⟩⟧) ⟨r, _⟩
theorem ord_le {c o} : ord c ≤ o ↔ c ≤ o.card :=
quotient.induction_on c $ λ α, induction_on o $ λ β s _,
let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α in begin
resetI, simp only [mk_def, card_type], split; intro h,
{ rw e at h, exact let ⟨f⟩ := h in ⟨f.to_embedding⟩ },
{ cases h with f,
have g := order_embedding.preimage f s,
haveI := order_embedding.is_well_order g,
exact le_trans (ord_le_type _) (type_le'.2 ⟨g⟩) }
end
theorem lt_ord {c o} : o < ord c ↔ o.card < c :=
by rw [← not_le, ← not_le, ord_le]
@[simp] theorem card_ord (c) : (ord c).card = c :=
quotient.induction_on c $ λ α,
let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α in by simp only [mk_def, e, card_type]
theorem ord_card_le (o : ordinal) : o.card.ord ≤ o :=
ord_le.2 (le_refl _)
lemma lt_ord_succ_card (o : ordinal) : o < o.card.succ.ord :=
by { rw [lt_ord], apply cardinal.lt_succ_self }
@[simp] theorem ord_le_ord {c₁ c₂} : ord c₁ ≤ ord c₂ ↔ c₁ ≤ c₂ :=
by simp only [ord_le, card_ord]
@[simp] theorem ord_lt_ord {c₁ c₂} : ord c₁ < ord c₂ ↔ c₁ < c₂ :=
by simp only [lt_ord, card_ord]
@[simp] theorem ord_zero : ord 0 = 0 :=
le_antisymm (ord_le.2 $ zero_le _) (ordinal.zero_le _)
@[simp] theorem ord_nat (n : ℕ) : ord n = n :=
le_antisymm (ord_le.2 $ by simp only [card_nat]) $ begin
induction n with n IH,
{ apply ordinal.zero_le },
{ exact (@ordinal.succ_le n _).2 (lt_of_le_of_lt IH $
ord_lt_ord.2 $ nat_cast_lt.2 (nat.lt_succ_self n)) }
end
@[simp] theorem lift_ord (c) : (ord c).lift = ord (lift c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ o, le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 $ begin
split; intro h,
{ rcases ordinal.lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨a, e, h⟩,
rwa [← e, lt_ord, ← lift_card, lift_lt, ← lt_ord] },
{ rw lt_ord at h,
rcases lift_down' (le_of_lt h) with ⟨o, rfl⟩,
rw [← lift_card, lift_lt] at h,
rwa [ordinal.lift_lt, lt_ord] }
end
lemma mk_ord_out (c : cardinal) : mk c.ord.out.α = c :=
by rw [←card_type c.ord.out.r, type_out, card_ord]
lemma card_typein_lt (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (x : α)
(h : ord (mk α) = type r) : card (typein r x) < mk α :=
by { rw [←ord_lt_ord, h], refine lt_of_le_of_lt (ord_card_le _) (typein_lt_type r x) }
lemma card_typein_out_lt (c : cardinal) (x : c.ord.out.α) : card (typein c.ord.out.r x) < c :=
by { convert card_typein_lt c.ord.out.r x _, rw [mk_ord_out], rw [type_out, mk_ord_out] }
lemma ord_injective : injective ord :=
by { intros c c' h, rw [←card_ord c, ←card_ord c', h] }
def ord.order_embedding : @order_embedding cardinal ordinal (<) (<) :=
order_embedding.of_monotone cardinal.ord $ λ a b, cardinal.ord_lt_ord.2
@[simp] theorem ord.order_embedding_coe :
(ord.order_embedding : cardinal → ordinal) = ord := rfl
/-- The cardinal `univ` is the cardinality of ordinal `univ`, or
equivalently the cardinal of `ordinal.{u}`, or `cardinal.{u}`,
as an element of `cardinal.{v}` (when `u < v`). -/
def univ := lift.{(u+1) v} (mk ordinal)
theorem univ_id : univ.{u (u+1)} = mk ordinal := lift_id _
@[simp] theorem lift_univ : lift.{_ w} univ.{u v} = univ.{u (max v w)} := lift_lift _
theorem univ_umax : univ.{u (max (u+1) v)} = univ.{u v} := congr_fun lift_umax _
theorem lift_lt_univ (c : cardinal) : lift.{u (u+1)} c < univ.{u (u+1)} :=
by simpa only [lift.principal_seg_coe, lift_ord, lift_succ, ord_le, succ_le] using le_of_lt
(lift.principal_seg.{u (u+1)}.lt_top (succ c).ord)
theorem lift_lt_univ' (c : cardinal) : lift.{u (max (u+1) v)} c < univ.{u v} :=
by simpa only [lift_lift, lift_univ, univ_umax] using
lift_lt.{_ (max (u+1) v)}.2 (lift_lt_univ c)
@[simp] theorem ord_univ : ord univ.{u v} = ordinal.univ.{u v} :=
le_antisymm (ord_card_le _) $ le_of_forall_lt $ λ o h,
lt_ord.2 begin
rcases lift.principal_seg.{u v}.down'.1
(by simpa only [lift.principal_seg_coe] using h) with ⟨o', rfl⟩,
simp only [lift.principal_seg_coe], rw [← lift_card],
apply lift_lt_univ'
end
theorem lt_univ {c} : c < univ.{u (u+1)} ↔ ∃ c', c = lift.{u (u+1)} c' :=
⟨λ h, begin
have := ord_lt_ord.2 h,
rw ord_univ at this,
cases lift.principal_seg.{u (u+1)}.down'.1
(by simpa only [lift.principal_seg_top]) with o e,
have := card_ord c,
rw [← e, lift.principal_seg_coe, ← lift_card] at this,
exact ⟨_, this.symm⟩
end, λ ⟨c', e⟩, e.symm ▸ lift_lt_univ _⟩
theorem lt_univ' {c} : c < univ.{u v} ↔ ∃ c', c = lift.{u (max (u+1) v)} c' :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a, e, h'⟩ := lt_lift_iff.1 h in begin
rw [← univ_id] at h',
rcases lt_univ.{u}.1 h' with ⟨c', rfl⟩,
exact ⟨c', by simp only [e.symm, lift_lift]⟩
end, λ ⟨c', e⟩, e.symm ▸ lift_lt_univ' _⟩
end cardinal
namespace ordinal
@[simp] theorem card_univ : card univ = cardinal.univ := rfl
/-- The supremum of a family of ordinals -/
def sup {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : ordinal :=
omin {c | ∀ i, f i ≤ c}
⟨(sup (cardinal.succ ∘ card ∘ f)).ord, λ i, le_of_lt $
cardinal.lt_ord.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (cardinal.lt_succ_self _) (le_sup _ _))⟩
theorem le_sup {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : ∀ i, f i ≤ sup f :=
omin_mem {c | ∀ i, f i ≤ c} _
theorem sup_le {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : sup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
⟨λ h i, le_trans (le_sup _ _) h, λ h, omin_le h⟩
theorem lt_sup {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : a < sup f ↔ ∃ i, a < f i :=
by simpa only [not_forall, not_le] using not_congr (@sup_le _ f a)
theorem is_normal.sup {f} (H : is_normal f)
{ι} {g : ι → ordinal} (h : nonempty ι) : f (sup g) = sup (f ∘ g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ a,
by rw [sup_le, comp, H.le_set' (λ_:ι, true) g (let ⟨i⟩ := h in ⟨i, ⟨⟩⟩)];
intros; simp only [sup_le, true_implies_iff]
theorem sup_ord {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) : sup (λ i, (f i).ord) = (cardinal.sup f).ord :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ a, by simp only [sup_le, cardinal.ord_le, cardinal.sup_le]
lemma sup_succ {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : sup (λ i, succ (f i)) ≤ succ (sup f) :=
by { rw [ordinal.sup_le], intro i, rw ordinal.succ_le_succ, apply ordinal.le_sup }
lemma unbounded_range_of_sup_ge {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (f : β → α)
(h : sup.{u u} (typein r ∘ f) ≥ type r) : unbounded r (range f) :=
begin
apply (not_bounded_iff _).mp, rintro ⟨x, hx⟩, apply not_lt_of_ge h,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ (typein_lt_type r x), rw [sup_le], intro y,
apply le_of_lt, rw typein_lt_typein, apply hx, apply mem_range_self
end
/-- The supremum of a family of ordinals indexed by the set
of ordinals less than some `o : ordinal.{u}`.
(This is not a special case of `sup` over the subtype,
because `{a // a < o} : Type (u+1)` and `sup` only works over
families in `Type u`.) -/
def bsup (o : ordinal.{u}) : (Π a < o, ordinal.{max u v}) → ordinal.{max u v} :=
match o, o.out, o.out_eq with
| _, ⟨α, r, _⟩, rfl, f := by exactI sup (λ a, f (typein r a) (typein_lt_type _ _))
end
theorem bsup_le {o f a} : bsup.{u v} o f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h ≤ a :=
match o, o.out, o.out_eq, f :
∀ o w (e : ⟦w⟧ = o) (f : Π (a : ordinal.{u}), a < o → ordinal.{(max u v)}),
bsup._match_1 o w e f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h ≤ a with
| _, ⟨α, r, _⟩, rfl, f := by rw [bsup._match_1, sup_le]; exactI
⟨λ H i h, by simpa only [typein_enum] using H (enum r i h), λ H b, H _ _⟩
end
theorem bsup_type (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (f) :
bsup (type r) f = sup (λ a, f (typein r a) (typein_lt_type _ _)) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ o,
by rw [bsup_le, sup_le]; exact
⟨λ H b, H _ _, λ H i h, by simpa only [typein_enum] using H (enum r i h)⟩
theorem le_bsup {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) (i h) : f i h ≤ bsup o f :=
bsup_le.1 (le_refl _) _ _
theorem lt_bsup {o : ordinal} {f : Π a < o, ordinal}
(hf : ∀{a a'} (ha : a < o) (ha' : a' < o), a < a' → f a ha < f a' ha')
(ho : o.is_limit) (i h) : f i h < bsup o f :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (hf _ _ $ lt_succ_self i) (le_bsup f i.succ $ ho.2 _ h)
theorem bsup_id {o} (ho : is_limit o) : bsup.{u u} o (λ x _, x) = o :=
begin
apply le_antisymm, rw [bsup_le], intro i, apply le_of_lt,
rw [←not_lt], intro h, apply lt_irrefl (bsup.{u u} o (λ x _, x)),
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ (lt_bsup _ ho _ h), refl, intros, assumption
end
theorem is_normal.bsup {f} (H : is_normal f)
{o : ordinal} : ∀ (g : Π a < o, ordinal) (h : o ≠ 0),
f (bsup o g) = bsup o (λ a h, f (g a h)) :=
induction_on o $ λ α r _ g h,
by resetI; rw [bsup_type,
H.sup (type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.1 h), bsup_type]
theorem is_normal.bsup_eq {f} (H : is_normal f) {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) :
bsup.{u} o (λx _, f x) = f o :=
by { rw [←is_normal.bsup.{u u} H (λ x _, x) h.1, bsup_id h] }
/-- The ordinal exponential, defined by transfinite recursion. -/
def power (a b : ordinal) : ordinal :=
if a = 0 then 1 - b else
limit_rec_on b 1 (λ _ IH, IH * a) (λ b _, bsup.{u u} b)
instance : has_pow ordinal ordinal := ⟨power⟩
local infixr ^ := @pow ordinal ordinal ordinal.has_pow
theorem zero_power' (a : ordinal) : 0 ^ a = 1 - a :=
by simp only [pow, power, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] theorem zero_power {a : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^ a = 0 :=
by rwa [zero_power', sub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp] theorem power_zero (a : ordinal) : a ^ 0 = 1 :=
by by_cases a = 0; [simp only [pow, power, if_pos h, sub_zero],
simp only [pow, power, if_neg h, limit_rec_on_zero]]
@[simp] theorem power_succ (a b : ordinal) : a ^ succ b = a ^ b * a :=
if h : a = 0 then by subst a; simp only [zero_power (succ_ne_zero _), mul_zero]
else by simp only [pow, power, limit_rec_on_succ, if_neg h]
theorem power_limit {a b : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : is_limit b) :
a ^ b = bsup.{u u} b (λ c _, a ^ c) :=
by simp only [pow, power, if_neg a0]; rw limit_rec_on_limit _ _ _ _ h; refl
theorem power_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : is_limit b) :
a ^ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a ^ b' ≤ c :=
by rw [power_limit a0 h, bsup_le]
theorem lt_power_of_limit {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (h : is_limit c) :
a < b ^ c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b ^ c' :=
by rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists]; simp only [not_lt, power_le_of_limit b0 h, exists_prop, not_and]
@[simp] theorem power_one (a : ordinal) : a ^ 1 = a :=
by rw [← succ_zero, power_succ]; simp only [power_zero, one_mul]
@[simp] theorem one_power (a : ordinal) : 1 ^ a = 1 :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on a,
{ simp only [power_zero] },
{ intros _ ih, simp only [power_succ, ih, mul_one] },
refine λ b l IH, eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ c, _),
rw [power_le_of_limit one_ne_zero l],
exact ⟨λ H, by simpa only [power_zero] using H 0 l.pos,
λ H b' h, by rwa IH _ h⟩,
end
theorem power_pos {a : ordinal} (b)
(a0 : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b :=
begin
have h0 : 0 < a ^ 0, {simp only [power_zero, zero_lt_one]},
apply limit_rec_on b,
{ exact h0 },
{ intros b IH, rw [power_succ],
exact mul_pos IH a0 },
{ exact λ b l _, (lt_power_of_limit (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 a0) l).2
⟨0, l.pos, h0⟩ },
end
theorem power_ne_zero {a : ordinal} (b)
(a0 : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.1 $ power_pos b $ pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0
theorem power_is_normal {a : ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : is_normal ((^) a) :=
have a0 : 0 < a, from lt_trans zero_lt_one h,
⟨λ b, by simpa only [mul_one, power_succ] using
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left (power_pos b a0)).2 h,
λ b l c, power_le_of_limit (ne_of_gt a0) l⟩
theorem power_lt_power_iff_right {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b < a ^ c ↔ b < c :=
(power_is_normal a1).lt_iff
theorem power_le_power_iff_right {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(power_is_normal a1).le_iff
theorem power_right_inj {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b = a ^ c ↔ b = c :=
(power_is_normal a1).inj
theorem power_is_limit {a b : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : is_limit b → is_limit (a ^ b) :=
(power_is_normal a1).is_limit
theorem power_is_limit_left {a b : ordinal}
(l : is_limit a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : is_limit (a ^ b) :=
begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with e|⟨b,rfl⟩|l',
{ exact absurd e hb },
{ rw power_succ,
exact mul_is_limit (power_pos _ l.pos) l },
{ exact power_is_limit l.one_lt l' }
end
theorem power_le_power_right {a b c : ordinal}
(h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 h₁) with h₁ h₁,
{ exact (power_le_power_iff_right h₁).2 h₂ },
{ subst a, simp only [one_power] }
end
theorem power_le_power_left {a b : ordinal} (c)
(ab : a ≤ b) : a ^ c ≤ b ^ c :=
begin
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ subst a, by_cases c0 : c = 0,
{ subst c, simp only [power_zero] },
{ simp only [zero_power c0, zero_le] } },
{ apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp only [power_zero] },
{ intros c IH, simpa only [power_succ] using mul_le_mul IH ab },
{ exact λ c l IH, (power_le_of_limit a0 l).2
(λ b' h, le_trans (IH _ h) (power_le_power_right
(lt_of_lt_of_le (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) ab) (le_of_lt h))) } }
end
theorem le_power_self {a : ordinal} (b) (a1 : 1 < a) : b ≤ a ^ b :=
(power_is_normal a1).le_self _
theorem power_lt_power_left_of_succ {a b c : ordinal}
(ab : a < b) : a ^ succ c < b ^ succ c :=
by rw [power_succ, power_succ]; exact
lt_of_le_of_lt
(mul_le_mul_right _ $ power_le_power_left _ $ le_of_lt ab)
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ab (power_pos _ (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) ab)))
theorem power_add (a b c : ordinal) : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c :=
begin
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ subst a,
by_cases c0 : c = 0, {simp only [c0, add_zero, power_zero, mul_one]},
have : b+c ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le
(pos_iff_ne_zero.2 c0) (le_add_left _ _)),
simp only [zero_power c0, zero_power this, mul_zero] },
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 a1,
{ subst a1, simp only [one_power, mul_one] },
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp only [add_zero, power_zero, mul_one] },
{ intros c IH,
rw [add_succ, power_succ, IH, power_succ, mul_assoc] },
{ intros c l IH,
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ d, (((power_is_normal a1).trans
(add_is_normal b)).limit_le l).trans _),
simp only [IH] {contextual := tt},
exact (((mul_is_normal $ power_pos b (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0)).trans
(power_is_normal a1)).limit_le l).symm }
end
theorem power_dvd_power (a) {b c : ordinal}
(h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c :=
by rw [← add_sub_cancel_of_le h, power_add]; apply dvd_mul
theorem power_dvd_power_iff {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
not_le_of_lt ((power_lt_power_iff_right a1).2 hn) $
le_of_dvd (power_ne_zero _ $ one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 $ le_of_lt a1) h,
power_dvd_power _⟩
theorem power_mul (a b c : ordinal) : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, {simp only [b0, zero_mul, power_zero, one_power]},
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ subst a,
by_cases c0 : c = 0, {simp only [c0, mul_zero, power_zero]},
simp only [zero_power b0, zero_power c0, zero_power (mul_ne_zero b0 c0)] },
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 a1,
{ subst a1, simp only [one_power] },
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp only [mul_zero, power_zero] },
{ intros c IH,
rw [mul_succ, power_add, IH, power_succ] },
{ intros c l IH,
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ d, (((power_is_normal a1).trans
(mul_is_normal (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0))).limit_le l).trans _),
simp only [IH] {contextual := tt},
exact (power_le_of_limit (power_ne_zero _ a0) l).symm }
end
/-- The ordinal logarithm is the solution `u` to the equation
`x = b ^ u * v + w` where `v < b` and `w < b`. -/
def log (b : ordinal) (x : ordinal) : ordinal :=
if h : 1 < b then pred $
omin {o | x < b^o} ⟨succ x, succ_le.1 (le_power_self _ h)⟩
else 0
@[simp] theorem log_not_one_lt {b : ordinal} (b1 : ¬ 1 < b) (x : ordinal) : log b x = 0 :=
by simp only [log, dif_neg b1]
theorem log_def {b : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x : ordinal) : log b x =
pred (omin {o | x < b^o} (log._proof_1 b x b1)) :=
by simp only [log, dif_pos b1]
@[simp] theorem log_zero (b : ordinal) : log b 0 = 0 :=
if b1 : 1 < b then
by rw [log_def b1, ← le_zero, pred_le];
apply omin_le; change 0<b^succ 0;
rw [succ_zero, power_one];
exact lt_trans zero_lt_one b1
else by simp only [log_not_one_lt b1]
theorem succ_log_def {b x : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) : succ (log b x) =
omin {o | x < b^o} (log._proof_1 b x b1) :=
begin
let t := omin {o | x < b^o} (log._proof_1 b x b1),
have : x < b ^ t := omin_mem {o | x < b^o} _,
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit t with h|h|h,
{ refine (not_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 x0) _).elim,
simpa only [h, power_zero] },
{ rw [show log b x = pred t, from log_def b1 x,
succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h] },
{ rcases (lt_power_of_limit (ne_of_gt $ lt_trans zero_lt_one b1) h).1 this with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact (not_le_of_lt h₁).elim (le_omin.1 (le_refl t) a h₂) }
end
theorem lt_power_succ_log {b : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x : ordinal) :
x < b ^ succ (log b x) :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (zero_le x) with x0 x0,
{ rw [succ_log_def b1 x0], exact omin_mem {o | x < b^o} _ },
{ subst x, apply power_pos _ (lt_trans zero_lt_one b1) }
end
theorem power_log_le (b) {x : ordinal} (x0 : 0 < x) :
b ^ log b x ≤ x :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0,
{ rw [b0, zero_power'],
refine le_trans (sub_le_self _ _) (one_le_iff_pos.2 x0) },
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with b1 b1,
{ refine le_of_not_lt (λ h, not_le_of_lt (lt_succ_self (log b x)) _),
have := @omin_le {o | x < b^o} _ _ h,
rwa ← succ_log_def b1 x0 at this },
{ rw [← b1, one_power], exact one_le_iff_pos.2 x0 }
end
theorem le_log {b x c : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) :
c ≤ log b x ↔ b ^ c ≤ x :=
⟨λ h, le_trans ((power_le_power_iff_right b1).2 h) (power_log_le b x0),
λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
not_le_of_lt (lt_power_succ_log b1 x) $
le_trans ((power_le_power_iff_right b1).2 (succ_le.2 hn)) h⟩
theorem log_lt {b x c : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) :
log b x < c ↔ x < b ^ c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_log b1 x0)
theorem log_le_log (b) {x y : ordinal} (xy : x ≤ y) :
log b x ≤ log b y :=
if x0 : x = 0 then by simp only [x0, log_zero, zero_le] else
have x0 : 0 < x, from pos_iff_ne_zero.2 x0,
if b1 : 1 < b then
(le_log b1 (lt_of_lt_of_le x0 xy)).2 $ le_trans (power_log_le _ x0) xy
else by simp only [log_not_one_lt b1, zero_le]
theorem log_le_self (b x : ordinal) : log b x ≤ x :=
if x0 : x = 0 then by simp only [x0, log_zero, zero_le] else
if b1 : 1 < b then
le_trans (le_power_self _ b1) (power_log_le b (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 x0))
else by simp only [log_not_one_lt b1, zero_le]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_mul {m n : ℕ} : ((m * n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m * n :=
by induction n with n IH; [simp only [nat.cast_zero, nat.mul_zero, mul_zero],
rw [nat.mul_succ, nat.cast_add, IH, nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_power {m n : ℕ} : ((pow m n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m ^ n :=
by induction n with n IH; [simp only [nat.pow_zero, nat.cast_zero, power_zero, nat.cast_one],
rw [nat.pow_succ, nat_cast_mul, IH, nat.cast_succ, ← succ_eq_add_one, power_succ]]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_le {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw [← cardinal.ord_nat, ← cardinal.ord_nat,
cardinal.ord_le_ord, cardinal.nat_cast_le]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_lt {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) < n ↔ m < n :=
by simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, nat_cast_le]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) = n ↔ m = n :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, nat_cast_le]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ordinal) = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
@nat_cast_inj n 0
theorem nat_cast_ne_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ordinal) ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr nat_cast_eq_zero
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_pos {n : ℕ} : (0 : ordinal) < n ↔ 0 < n :=
@nat_cast_lt 0 n
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_sub {m n : ℕ} : ((m - n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m - n :=
(_root_.le_total m n).elim
(λ h, by rw [nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (nat_cast_le.2 h)]; refl)
(λ h, (add_left_cancel n).1 $ by rw [← nat.cast_add,
nat.add_sub_cancel' h, add_sub_cancel_of_le (nat_cast_le.2 h)])
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_div {m n : ℕ} : ((m / n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m / n :=
if n0 : n = 0 then by simp only [n0, nat.div_zero, nat.cast_zero, div_zero] else
have n0':_, from nat_cast_ne_zero.2 n0,
le_antisymm
(by rw [le_div n0', ← nat_cast_mul, nat_cast_le, mul_comm];
apply nat.div_mul_le_self)
(by rw [div_le n0', succ, ← nat.cast_succ, ← nat_cast_mul,
nat_cast_lt, mul_comm, ← nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0)];
apply nat.lt_succ_self)
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_mod {m n : ℕ} : ((m % n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m % n :=
by rw [← add_left_cancel (n*(m/n)), div_add_mod, ← nat_cast_div, ← nat_cast_mul, ← nat.cast_add,
add_comm, nat.mod_add_div]
@[simp] theorem nat_le_card {o} {n : ℕ} : (n : cardinal) ≤ card o ↔ (n : ordinal) ≤ o :=
⟨λ h, by rwa [← cardinal.ord_le, cardinal.ord_nat] at h,
λ h, card_nat n ▸ card_le_card h⟩
@[simp] theorem nat_lt_card {o} {n : ℕ} : (n : cardinal) < card o ↔ (n : ordinal) < o :=
by rw [← succ_le, ← cardinal.succ_le, cardinal.nat_succ, nat_le_card]; refl
@[simp] theorem card_lt_nat {o} {n : ℕ} : card o < n ↔ o < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le nat_le_card
@[simp] theorem card_le_nat {o} {n : ℕ} : card o ≤ n ↔ o ≤ n :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 nat_lt_card
@[simp] theorem card_eq_nat {o} {n : ℕ} : card o = n ↔ o = n :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, card_le_nat, nat_le_card]
@[simp] theorem type_fin (n : ℕ) : @type (fin n) (<) _ = n :=
by rw [← card_eq_nat, card_type, mk_fin]
@[simp] theorem lift_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : lift n = n :=
by induction n with n ih; [simp only [nat.cast_zero, lift_zero],
simp only [nat.cast_succ, lift_add, ih, lift_one]]
theorem lift_type_fin (n : ℕ) : lift (@type (fin n) (<) _) = n :=
by simp only [type_fin, lift_nat_cast]
theorem fintype_card (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] [fintype α] : type r = fintype.card α :=
by rw [← card_eq_nat, card_type, fintype_card]
end ordinal
namespace cardinal
open ordinal
@[simp] theorem ord_omega : ord.{u} omega = ordinal.omega :=
le_antisymm (ord_le.2 $ le_refl _) $
le_of_forall_lt $ λ o h, begin
rcases ordinal.lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨o, rfl, h'⟩,
rw [lt_ord, ← lift_card, ← lift_omega.{0 u},
lift_lt, ← typein_enum (<) h'],
exact lt_omega_iff_fintype.2 ⟨set.fintype_lt_nat _⟩
end
@[simp] theorem add_one_of_omega_le {c} (h : omega ≤ c) : c + 1 = c :=
by rw [add_comm, ← card_ord c, ← card_one,
← card_add, one_add_of_omega_le];
rwa [← ord_omega, ord_le_ord]
end cardinal
namespace ordinal
theorem lt_omega {o : ordinal.{u}} : o < omega ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n :=
by rw [← cardinal.ord_omega, cardinal.lt_ord, lt_omega]; simp only [card_eq_nat]
theorem nat_lt_omega (n : ℕ) : (n : ordinal) < omega :=
lt_omega.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem omega_pos : 0 < omega := nat_lt_omega 0
theorem omega_ne_zero : omega ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt omega_pos
theorem one_lt_omega : 1 < omega := by simpa only [nat.cast_one] using nat_lt_omega 1
theorem omega_is_limit : is_limit omega :=
⟨omega_ne_zero, λ o h,
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega.1 h in
by rw [e]; exact nat_lt_omega (n+1)⟩
theorem omega_le {o : ordinal.{u}} : omega ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ordinal) ≤ o :=
⟨λ h n, le_trans (le_of_lt (nat_lt_omega _)) h,
λ H, le_of_forall_lt $ λ a h,
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega.1 h in
by rw [e, ← succ_le]; exact H (n+1)⟩
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ordinal) < o
| 0 := lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le o) h.1.symm
| (n+1) := h.2 _ (nat_lt_limit n)
theorem omega_le_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : omega ≤ o :=
omega_le.2 $ λ n, le_of_lt $ nat_lt_limit h n
theorem add_omega {a : ordinal} (h : a < omega) : a + omega = omega :=
begin
rcases lt_omega.1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
clear h, induction n with n IH,
{ rw [nat.cast_zero, zero_add] },
{ rw [nat.cast_succ, add_assoc, one_add_of_omega_le (le_refl _), IH] }
end
theorem add_lt_omega {a b : ordinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a + b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
theorem mul_lt_omega {a b : ordinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a * b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat_cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
theorem is_limit_iff_omega_dvd {a : ordinal} : is_limit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ omega ∣ a :=
begin
refine ⟨λ l, ⟨l.1, ⟨a / omega, le_antisymm _ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, λ h, _⟩,
{ refine (limit_le l).2 (λ x hx, le_of_lt _),
rw [← div_lt omega_ne_zero, ← succ_le, le_div omega_ne_zero,
mul_succ, add_le_of_limit omega_is_limit],
intros b hb,
rcases lt_omega.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
exact le_trans (add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _)
(le_of_lt $ lt_sub.1 $ nat_lt_limit (sub_is_limit l hx) _) },
{ rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩,
refine mul_is_limit_left omega_is_limit
(pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ mt _ a0),
intro e, simp only [e, mul_zero] }
end
local infixr ^ := @pow ordinal ordinal ordinal.has_pow
theorem power_lt_omega {a b : ordinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a ^ b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat_cast_power]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
theorem add_omega_power {a b : ordinal} (h : a < omega ^ b) : a + omega ^ b = omega ^ b :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (le_add_left _ _),
revert h, apply limit_rec_on b,
{ intro h, rw [power_zero, ← succ_zero, lt_succ, le_zero] at h,
rw [h, zero_add] },
{ intros b _ h, rw [power_succ] at h,
rcases (lt_mul_of_limit omega_is_limit).1 h with ⟨x, xo, ax⟩,
refine le_trans (add_le_add_right (le_of_lt ax) _) _,
rw [power_succ, ← mul_add, add_omega xo] },
{ intros b l IH h, rcases (lt_power_of_limit omega_ne_zero l).1 h with ⟨x, xb, ax⟩,
refine (((add_is_normal a).trans (power_is_normal one_lt_omega))
.limit_le l).2 (λ y yb, _),
let z := max x y,
have := IH z (max_lt xb yb)
(lt_of_lt_of_le ax $ power_le_power_right omega_pos (le_max_left _ _)),
exact le_trans (add_le_add_left (power_le_power_right omega_pos (le_max_right _ _)) _)
(le_trans this (power_le_power_right omega_pos $ le_of_lt $ max_lt xb yb)) }
end
theorem add_lt_omega_power {a b c : ordinal} (h₁ : a < omega ^ c) (h₂ : b < omega ^ c) :
a + b < omega ^ c :=
by rwa [← add_omega_power h₁, add_lt_add_iff_left]
theorem add_absorp {a b c : ordinal} (h₁ : a < omega ^ b) (h₂ : omega ^ b ≤ c) : a + c = c :=
by rw [← add_sub_cancel_of_le h₂, ← add_assoc, add_omega_power h₁]
theorem add_absorp_iff {o : ordinal} (o0 : o > 0) : (∀ a < o, a + o = o) ↔ ∃ a, o = omega ^ a :=
⟨λ H, ⟨log omega o, begin
refine ((lt_or_eq_of_le (power_log_le _ o0))
.resolve_left $ λ h, _).symm,
have := H _ h,
have := lt_power_succ_log one_lt_omega o,
rw [power_succ, lt_mul_of_limit omega_is_limit] at this,
rcases this with ⟨a, ao, h'⟩,
rcases lt_omega.1 ao with ⟨n, rfl⟩, clear ao,
revert h', apply not_lt_of_le,
suffices e : omega ^ log omega o * ↑n + o = o,
{ simpa only [e] using le_add_right (omega ^ log omega o * ↑n) o },
induction n with n IH, {simp only [nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_add]},
simp only [nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one, add_assoc, this, IH]
end⟩,
λ ⟨b, e⟩, e.symm ▸ λ a, add_omega_power⟩
theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : ordinal} (ba : b + a = a)
(l : is_limit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) :
(a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 $ λ c' h, begin
apply le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ (le_of_lt $ lt_succ_self _)),
rw IH _ h,
apply le_trans (add_le_add_left _ _),
{ rw ← mul_succ, exact mul_le_mul_left _ (succ_le.2 $ l.2 _ h) },
{ rw ← ba, exact le_add_right _ _ }
end)
(mul_le_mul_right _ (le_add_right _ _))
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) :
(a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp only [succ_zero, mul_one] },
{ intros c IH,
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ] },
{ intros c l IH,
have := add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH,
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc] }
end
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : ordinal} (ba : b + a = a)
(l : is_limit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l (λ c' _, add_mul_succ c' ba)
theorem mul_omega {a : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) (ha : a < omega) : a * omega = omega :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit omega_is_limit).2 $ λ b hb, le_of_lt (mul_lt_omega ha hb))
(by simpa only [one_mul] using mul_le_mul_right omega (one_le_iff_pos.2 a0))
theorem mul_lt_omega_power {a b c : ordinal}
(c0 : 0 < c) (ha : a < omega ^ c) (hb : b < omega) : a * b < omega ^ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, mul_zero, power_pos _ omega_pos] else begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit c with rfl|⟨c,rfl⟩|l,
{ exact (lt_irrefl _).elim c0 },
{ rw power_succ at ha,
rcases ((mul_is_normal $ power_pos _ omega_pos).limit_lt
omega_is_limit).1 ha with ⟨n, hn, an⟩,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_lt an)) _,
rw [power_succ, mul_assoc, mul_lt_mul_iff_left (power_pos _ omega_pos)],
exact mul_lt_omega hn hb },
{ rcases ((power_is_normal one_lt_omega).limit_lt l).1 ha with ⟨x, hx, ax⟩,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul (le_of_lt ax) (le_of_lt hb)) _,
rw [← power_succ, power_lt_power_iff_right one_lt_omega],
exact l.2 _ hx }
end
theorem mul_omega_dvd {a : ordinal}
(a0 : 0 < a) (ha : a < omega) : ∀ {b}, omega ∣ b → a * b = b
| _ ⟨b, rfl⟩ := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_omega a0 ha]
theorem mul_omega_power_power {a b : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) (h : a < omega ^ omega ^ b) :
a * omega ^ omega ^ b = omega ^ omega ^ b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, {rw [b0, power_zero, power_one] at h ⊢, exact mul_omega a0 h},
refine le_antisymm _ (by simpa only [one_mul] using mul_le_mul_right (omega^omega^b) (one_le_iff_pos.2 a0)),
rcases (lt_power_of_limit omega_ne_zero (power_is_limit_left omega_is_limit b0)).1 h
with ⟨x, xb, ax⟩,
refine le_trans (mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_lt ax)) _,
rw [← power_add, add_omega_power xb]
end
theorem power_omega {a : ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) (h : a < omega) : a ^ omega = omega :=
le_antisymm
((power_le_of_limit (one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 $ le_of_lt a1) omega_is_limit).2
(λ b hb, le_of_lt (power_lt_omega h hb)))
(le_power_self _ a1)
theorem CNF_aux {b o : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (o0 : o ≠ 0) :
o % b ^ log b o < o :=
lt_of_lt_of_le
(mod_lt _ $ power_ne_zero _ b0)
(power_log_le _ $ pos_iff_ne_zero.2 o0)
@[elab_as_eliminator] noncomputable def CNF_rec {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0)
{C : ordinal → Sort*}
(H0 : C 0)
(H : ∀ o, o ≠ 0 → o % b ^ log b o < o → C (o % b ^ log b o) → C o)
: ∀ o, C o
| o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then by rw o0; exact H0 else
have _, from CNF_aux b0 o0,
H o o0 this (CNF_rec (o % b ^ log b o))
using_well_founded {dec_tac := `[assumption]}
@[simp] theorem CNF_rec_zero {b} (b0) {C H0 H} : @CNF_rec b b0 C H0 H 0 = H0 :=
by rw [CNF_rec, dif_pos rfl]; refl
@[simp] theorem CNF_rec_ne_zero {b} (b0) {C H0 H o} (o0) :
@CNF_rec b b0 C H0 H o = H o o0 (CNF_aux b0 o0) (@CNF_rec b b0 C H0 H _) :=
by rw [CNF_rec, dif_neg o0]
/-- The Cantor normal form of an ordinal is the list of coefficients
in the base-`b` expansion of `o`.
CNF b (b ^ u₁ * v₁ + b ^ u₂ * v₂) = [(u₁, v₁), (u₂, v₂)] -/
def CNF (b := omega) (o : ordinal) : list (ordinal × ordinal) :=
if b0 : b = 0 then [] else
CNF_rec b0 [] (λ o o0 h IH, (log b o, o / b ^ log b o) :: IH) o
@[simp] theorem zero_CNF (o) : CNF 0 o = [] :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem CNF_zero (b) : CNF b 0 = [] :=
if b0 : b = 0 then dif_pos b0 else
(dif_neg b0).trans $ CNF_rec_zero _
theorem CNF_ne_zero {b o : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (o0 : o ≠ 0) :
CNF b o = (log b o, o / b ^ log b o) :: CNF b (o % b ^ log b o) :=
by unfold CNF; rw [dif_neg b0, dif_neg b0, CNF_rec_ne_zero b0 o0]
theorem one_CNF {o : ordinal} (o0 : o ≠ 0) :
CNF 1 o = [(0, o)] :=
by rw [CNF_ne_zero one_ne_zero o0, log_not_one_lt (lt_irrefl _), power_zero, mod_one, CNF_zero, div_one]
theorem CNF_foldr {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (o) :
(CNF b o).foldr (λ p r, b ^ p.1 * p.2 + r) 0 = o :=
CNF_rec b0 (by rw CNF_zero; refl)
(λ o o0 h IH, by rw [CNF_ne_zero b0 o0, list.foldr_cons, IH, div_add_mod]) o
theorem CNF_pairwise_aux (b := omega) (o) :
(∀ p ∈ CNF b o, prod.fst p ≤ log b o) ∧
(CNF b o).pairwise (λ p q, q.1 < p.1) :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0,
{ simp only [b0, zero_CNF, list.pairwise.nil, and_true], exact λ _, false.elim },
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with b1 b1,
{ refine CNF_rec b0 _ _ o,
{ simp only [CNF_zero, list.pairwise.nil, and_true], exact λ _, false.elim },
intros o o0 H IH, cases IH with IH₁ IH₂,
simp only [CNF_ne_zero b0 o0, list.forall_mem_cons, list.pairwise_cons, IH₂, and_true],
refine ⟨⟨le_refl _, λ p m, _⟩, λ p m, _⟩,
{ exact le_trans (IH₁ p m) (log_le_log _ $ le_of_lt H) },
{ refine lt_of_le_of_lt (IH₁ p m) ((log_lt b1 _).2 _),
{ rw pos_iff_ne_zero, intro e,
rw e at m, simpa only [CNF_zero] using m },
{ exact mod_lt _ (power_ne_zero _ b0) } } },
{ by_cases o0 : o = 0,
{ simp only [o0, CNF_zero, list.pairwise.nil, and_true], exact λ _, false.elim },
rw [← b1, one_CNF o0],
simp only [list.mem_singleton, log_not_one_lt (lt_irrefl _), forall_eq, le_refl, true_and, list.pairwise_singleton] }
end
theorem CNF_pairwise (b := omega) (o) :
(CNF b o).pairwise (λ p q, prod.fst q < p.1) :=
(CNF_pairwise_aux _ _).2
theorem CNF_fst_le_log (b := omega) (o) :
∀ p ∈ CNF b o, prod.fst p ≤ log b o :=
(CNF_pairwise_aux _ _).1
theorem CNF_fst_le (b := omega) (o) (p ∈ CNF b o) : prod.fst p ≤ o :=
le_trans (CNF_fst_le_log _ _ p H) (log_le_self _ _)
theorem CNF_snd_lt {b : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (o) :
∀ p ∈ CNF b o, prod.snd p < b :=
begin
have b0 := ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one b1),
refine CNF_rec b0 (λ _, by rw [CNF_zero]; exact false.elim) _ o,
intros o o0 H IH,
simp only [CNF_ne_zero b0 o0, list.mem_cons_iff, list.forall_mem_cons', iff_true_intro IH, and_true],
rw [div_lt (power_ne_zero _ b0), ← power_succ],
exact lt_power_succ_log b1 _,
end
theorem CNF_sorted (b := omega) (o) :
((CNF b o).map prod.fst).sorted (>) :=
by rw [list.sorted, list.pairwise_map]; exact CNF_pairwise b o
/-- The next fixed point function, the least fixed point of the
normal function `f` above `a`. -/
def nfp (f : ordinal → ordinal) (a : ordinal) :=
sup (λ n : ℕ, f^[n] a)
theorem iterate_le_nfp (f a n) : f^[n] a ≤ nfp f a :=
le_sup _ n
theorem le_nfp_self (f a) : a ≤ nfp f a :=
iterate_le_nfp f a 0
theorem is_normal.lt_nfp {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} :
f b < nfp f a ↔ b < nfp f a :=
lt_sup.trans $ iff.trans
(by exact
⟨λ ⟨n, h⟩, ⟨n, lt_of_le_of_lt (H.le_self _) h⟩,
λ ⟨n, h⟩, ⟨n+1, by rw nat.iterate_succ'; exact H.lt_iff.2 h⟩⟩)
lt_sup.symm
theorem is_normal.nfp_le {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} :
nfp f a ≤ f b ↔ nfp f a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_nfp
theorem is_normal.nfp_le_fp {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b}
(ab : a ≤ b) (h : f b ≤ b) : nfp f a ≤ b :=
sup_le.2 $ λ i, begin
induction i with i IH generalizing a, {exact ab},
exact IH (le_trans (H.le_iff.2 ab) h),
end
theorem is_normal.nfp_fp {f} (H : is_normal f) (a) : f (nfp f a) = nfp f a :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (H.le_self _),
cases le_or_lt (f a) a with aa aa,
{ rwa le_antisymm (H.nfp_le_fp (le_refl _) aa) (le_nfp_self _ _) },
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (nfp f a) with e|⟨b, e⟩|l,
{ refine @le_trans _ _ _ (f a) _ (H.le_iff.2 _) (iterate_le_nfp f a 1),
simp only [e, zero_le] },
{ have : f b < nfp f a := H.lt_nfp.2 (by simp only [e, lt_succ_self]),
rw [e, lt_succ] at this,
have ab : a ≤ b,
{ rw [← lt_succ, ← e],
exact lt_of_lt_of_le aa (iterate_le_nfp f a 1) },
refine le_trans (H.le_iff.2 (H.nfp_le_fp ab this))
(le_trans this (le_of_lt _)),
simp only [e, lt_succ_self] },
{ exact (H.2 _ l _).2 (λ b h, le_of_lt (H.lt_nfp.2 h)) }
end
theorem is_normal.le_nfp {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} :
f b ≤ nfp f a ↔ b ≤ nfp f a :=
⟨le_trans (H.le_self _), λ h,
by simpa only [H.nfp_fp] using H.le_iff.2 h⟩
theorem nfp_eq_self {f : ordinal → ordinal} {a} (h : f a = a) : nfp f a = a :=
le_antisymm (sup_le.mpr $ λ i, by rw [nat.iterate₀ h]) (le_nfp_self f a)
/-- The derivative of a normal function `f` is
the sequence of fixed points of `f`. -/
def deriv (f : ordinal → ordinal) (o : ordinal) : ordinal :=
limit_rec_on o (nfp f 0)
(λ a IH, nfp f (succ IH))
(λ a l, bsup.{u u} a)
@[simp] theorem deriv_zero (f) : deriv f 0 = nfp f 0 := limit_rec_on_zero _ _ _
@[simp] theorem deriv_succ (f o) : deriv f (succ o) = nfp f (succ (deriv f o)) :=
limit_rec_on_succ _ _ _ _
theorem deriv_limit (f) {o} : is_limit o →
deriv f o = bsup.{u u} o (λ a _, deriv f a) :=
limit_rec_on_limit _ _ _ _
theorem deriv_is_normal (f) : is_normal (deriv f) :=
⟨λ o, by rw [deriv_succ, ← succ_le]; apply le_nfp_self,
λ o l a, by rw [deriv_limit _ l, bsup_le]⟩
theorem is_normal.deriv_fp {f} (H : is_normal f) (o) : f (deriv.{u} f o) = deriv f o :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on o,
{ rw [deriv_zero, H.nfp_fp] },
{ intros o ih, rw [deriv_succ, H.nfp_fp] },
intros o l IH,
rw [deriv_limit _ l, is_normal.bsup.{u u u} H _ l.1],
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ c, _),
simp only [bsup_le, IH] {contextual:=tt}
end
theorem is_normal.fp_iff_deriv {f} (H : is_normal f)
{a} : f a ≤ a ↔ ∃ o, a = deriv f o :=
⟨λ ha, begin
suffices : ∀ o (_:a ≤ deriv f o), ∃ o, a = deriv f o,
from this a ((deriv_is_normal _).le_self _),
intro o, apply limit_rec_on o,
{ intros h₁,
refine ⟨0, le_antisymm h₁ _⟩,
rw deriv_zero,
exact H.nfp_le_fp (zero_le _) ha },
{ intros o IH h₁,
cases le_or_lt a (deriv f o), {exact IH h},
refine ⟨succ o, le_antisymm h₁ _⟩,
rw deriv_succ,
exact H.nfp_le_fp (succ_le.2 h) ha },
{ intros o l IH h₁,
cases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁, {exact ⟨_, h⟩},
rw [deriv_limit _ l, ← not_le, bsup_le, not_ball] at h,
exact let ⟨o', h, hl⟩ := h in IH o' h (le_of_not_le hl) }
end, λ ⟨o, e⟩, e.symm ▸ le_of_eq (H.deriv_fp _)⟩
end ordinal
namespace cardinal
section using_ordinals
open ordinal
theorem ord_is_limit {c} (co : omega ≤ c) : (ord c).is_limit :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, omega_ne_zero _, λ a, lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le _⟩,
{ rw [← ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h,
simpa only [card_zero, le_zero] using le_trans co h },
{ intro h, rw [ord_le] at h ⊢,
rwa [← @add_one_of_omega_le (card a), ← card_succ],
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_is_limit, ord_le],
{ exact le_trans co h },
{ rw ord_omega, exact omega_is_limit } }
end
def aleph_idx.initial_seg : @initial_seg cardinal ordinal (<) (<) :=
@order_embedding.collapse cardinal ordinal (<) (<) _ cardinal.ord.order_embedding
/-- The `aleph'` index function, which gives the ordinal index of a cardinal.
(The `aleph'` part is because unlike `aleph` this counts also the
finite stages. So `aleph_idx n = n`, `aleph_idx ω = ω`,
`aleph_idx ℵ₁ = ω + 1` and so on.) -/
def aleph_idx : cardinal → ordinal := aleph_idx.initial_seg
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx.initial_seg_coe :
(aleph_idx.initial_seg : cardinal → ordinal) = aleph_idx := rfl
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx_lt {a b} : aleph_idx a < aleph_idx b ↔ a < b :=
aleph_idx.initial_seg.to_order_embedding.ord'.symm
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx_le {a b} : aleph_idx a ≤ aleph_idx b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_lt, ← not_lt, aleph_idx_lt]
theorem aleph_idx.init {a b} : b < aleph_idx a → ∃ c, aleph_idx c = b :=
aleph_idx.initial_seg.init _ _
def aleph_idx.order_iso : @order_iso cardinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (<) (<) :=
@order_iso.of_surjective cardinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (<) (<) aleph_idx.initial_seg.{u} $
(initial_seg.eq_or_principal aleph_idx.initial_seg.{u}).resolve_right $
λ ⟨o, e⟩, begin
have : ∀ c, aleph_idx c < o := λ c, (e _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩,
refine ordinal.induction_on o _ this, introsI α r _ h,
let s := sup.{u u} (λ a:α, inv_fun aleph_idx (ordinal.typein r a)),
apply not_le_of_gt (lt_succ_self s),
have I : injective aleph_idx := aleph_idx.initial_seg.to_embedding.inj,
simpa only [typein_enum, left_inverse_inv_fun I (succ s)] using
le_sup.{u u} (λ a, inv_fun aleph_idx (ordinal.typein r a))
(ordinal.enum r _ (h (succ s))),
end
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx.order_iso_coe :
(aleph_idx.order_iso : cardinal → ordinal) = aleph_idx := rfl
@[simp] theorem type_cardinal : @ordinal.type cardinal (<) _ = ordinal.univ.{u (u+1)} :=
by rw ordinal.univ_id; exact quotient.sound ⟨aleph_idx.order_iso⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_cardinal : mk cardinal = univ.{u (u+1)} :=
by simpa only [card_type, card_univ] using congr_arg card type_cardinal
def aleph'.order_iso := cardinal.aleph_idx.order_iso.symm
/-- The `aleph'` function gives the cardinals listed by their ordinal
index, and is the inverse of `aleph_idx`.
`aleph' n = n`, `aleph' ω = ω`, `aleph' (ω + 1) = ℵ₁, etc. -/
def aleph' : ordinal → cardinal := aleph'.order_iso
@[simp] theorem aleph'.order_iso_coe :
(aleph'.order_iso : ordinal → cardinal) = aleph' := rfl
@[simp] theorem aleph'_lt {o₁ o₂ : ordinal.{u}} : aleph' o₁ < aleph' o₂ ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
aleph'.order_iso.ord'.symm
@[simp] theorem aleph'_le {o₁ o₂ : ordinal.{u}} : aleph' o₁ ≤ aleph' o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 aleph'_lt
@[simp] theorem aleph'_aleph_idx (c : cardinal.{u}) : aleph' c.aleph_idx = c :=
cardinal.aleph_idx.order_iso.to_equiv.symm_apply_apply c
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx_aleph' (o : ordinal.{u}) : (aleph' o).aleph_idx = o :=
cardinal.aleph_idx.order_iso.to_equiv.apply_symm_apply o
@[simp] theorem aleph'_zero : aleph' 0 = 0 :=
by rw [← le_zero, ← aleph'_aleph_idx 0, aleph'_le];
apply ordinal.zero_le
@[simp] theorem aleph'_succ {o : ordinal.{u}} : aleph' o.succ = (aleph' o).succ :=
le_antisymm
(cardinal.aleph_idx_le.1 $
by rw [aleph_idx_aleph', ordinal.succ_le, ← aleph'_lt, aleph'_aleph_idx];
apply cardinal.lt_succ_self)
(cardinal.succ_le.2 $ aleph'_lt.2 $ ordinal.lt_succ_self _)
@[simp] theorem aleph'_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, aleph' n = n
| 0 := aleph'_zero
| (n+1) := show aleph' (ordinal.succ n) = n.succ,
by rw [aleph'_succ, aleph'_nat, nat_succ]
theorem aleph'_le_of_limit {o : ordinal.{u}} (l : o.is_limit) {c} :
aleph' o ≤ c ↔ ∀ o' < o, aleph' o' ≤ c :=
⟨λ h o' h', le_trans (aleph'_le.2 $ le_of_lt h') h,
λ h, begin
rw [← aleph'_aleph_idx c, aleph'_le, ordinal.limit_le l],
intros x h',
rw [← aleph'_le, aleph'_aleph_idx],
exact h _ h'
end⟩
@[simp] theorem aleph'_omega : aleph' ordinal.omega = omega :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, begin
simp only [aleph'_le_of_limit omega_is_limit, ordinal.lt_omega, exists_imp_distrib, omega_le],
exact forall_swap.trans (forall_congr $ λ n, by simp only [forall_eq, aleph'_nat]),
end
/-- aleph' and aleph_idx form an equivalence between `ordinal` and `cardinal` -/
@[simp] def aleph'_equiv : ordinal ≃ cardinal :=
⟨aleph', aleph_idx, aleph_idx_aleph', aleph'_aleph_idx⟩
/-- The `aleph` function gives the infinite cardinals listed by their
ordinal index. `aleph 0 = ω`, `aleph 1 = succ ω` is the first
uncountable cardinal, and so on. -/
def aleph (o : ordinal) : cardinal := aleph' (ordinal.omega + o)
@[simp] theorem aleph_lt {o₁ o₂ : ordinal.{u}} : aleph o₁ < aleph o₂ ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
aleph'_lt.trans (ordinal.add_lt_add_iff_left _)
@[simp] theorem aleph_le {o₁ o₂ : ordinal.{u}} : aleph o₁ ≤ aleph o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 aleph_lt
@[simp] theorem aleph_succ {o : ordinal.{u}} : aleph o.succ = (aleph o).succ :=
by rw [aleph, ordinal.add_succ, aleph'_succ]; refl
@[simp] theorem aleph_zero : aleph 0 = omega :=
by simp only [aleph, add_zero, aleph'_omega]
theorem omega_le_aleph' {o : ordinal} : omega ≤ aleph' o ↔ ordinal.omega ≤ o :=
by rw [← aleph'_omega, aleph'_le]
theorem omega_le_aleph (o : ordinal) : omega ≤ aleph o :=
by rw [aleph, omega_le_aleph']; apply ordinal.le_add_right
theorem ord_aleph_is_limit (o : ordinal) : is_limit (aleph o).ord :=
ord_is_limit $ omega_le_aleph _
theorem exists_aleph {c : cardinal} : omega ≤ c ↔ ∃ o, c = aleph o :=
⟨λ h, ⟨aleph_idx c - ordinal.omega,
by rw [aleph, ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le, aleph'_aleph_idx];
rwa [← omega_le_aleph', aleph'_aleph_idx]⟩,
λ ⟨o, e⟩, e.symm ▸ omega_le_aleph _⟩
theorem aleph'_is_normal : is_normal (ord ∘ aleph') :=
⟨λ o, ord_lt_ord.2 $ aleph'_lt.2 $ ordinal.lt_succ_self _,
λ o l a, by simp only [ord_le, aleph'_le_of_limit l]⟩
theorem aleph_is_normal : is_normal (ord ∘ aleph) :=
aleph'_is_normal.trans $ add_is_normal ordinal.omega
/- properties of mul -/
theorem mul_eq_self {c : cardinal} (h : omega ≤ c) : c * c = c :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _
(by simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul_left c (le_trans (le_of_lt one_lt_omega) h)),
refine acc.rec_on (cardinal.wf.apply c) (λ c _,
quotient.induction_on c $ λ α IH ol, _) h,
rcases ord_eq α with ⟨r, wo, e⟩, resetI,
let := decidable_linear_order_of_STO' r,
have : is_well_order α (<) := wo,
let g : α × α → α := λ p, max p.1 p.2,
let f : α × α ↪ ordinal × (α × α) :=
⟨λ p:α×α, (typein (<) (g p), p), λ p q, congr_arg prod.snd⟩,
let s := f ⁻¹'o (prod.lex (<) (prod.lex (<) (<))),
have : is_well_order _ s := (order_embedding.preimage _ _).is_well_order,
suffices : type s ≤ type r, {exact card_le_card this},
refine le_of_forall_lt (λ o h, _),
rcases typein_surj s h with ⟨p, rfl⟩,
rw [← e, lt_ord],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (_ : _ ≤ card (typein (<) (g p)).succ * card (typein (<) (g p)).succ) _,
{ have : {q|s q p} ⊆ (insert (g p) {x | x < (g p)}).prod (insert (g p) {x | x < (g p)}),
{ intros q h,
simp only [s, embedding.coe_fn_mk, order.preimage, typein_lt_typein, prod.lex_def, typein_inj] at h,
exact max_le_iff.1 (le_iff_lt_or_eq.2 $ h.imp_right and.left) },
suffices H : (insert (g p) {x | r x (g p)} : set α) ≃ ({x | r x (g p)} ⊕ punit),
{ exact ⟨(set.embedding_of_subset this).trans
((equiv.set.prod _ _).trans (H.prod_congr H)).to_embedding⟩ },
refine (equiv.set.insert _).trans
((equiv.refl _).sum_congr punit_equiv_punit),
apply @irrefl _ r },
cases lt_or_ge (card (typein (<) (g p)).succ) omega with qo qo,
{ exact lt_of_lt_of_le (mul_lt_omega qo qo) ol },
{ suffices, {exact lt_of_le_of_lt (IH _ this qo) this},
rw ← lt_ord, apply (ord_is_limit ol).2,
rw [mk_def, e], apply typein_lt_type }
end
end using_ordinals
theorem mul_eq_max {a b : cardinal} (ha : omega ≤ a) (hb : omega ≤ b) : a * b = max a b :=
le_antisymm
(mul_eq_self (le_trans ha (le_max_left a b)) ▸
mul_le_mul (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)) $
max_le
(by simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul_left a (le_trans (le_of_lt one_lt_omega) hb))
(by simpa only [one_mul] using mul_le_mul_right b (le_trans (le_of_lt one_lt_omega) ha))
theorem mul_lt_of_lt {a b c : cardinal} (hc : omega ≤ c)
(h1 : a < c) (h2 : b < c) : a * b < c :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul (le_max_left a b) (le_max_right a b)) $
(lt_or_le (max a b) omega).elim
(λ h, lt_of_lt_of_le (mul_lt_omega h h) hc)
(λ h, by rw mul_eq_self h; exact max_lt h1 h2)
lemma mul_le_max_of_omega_le_left {a b : cardinal} (h : omega ≤ a) : a * b ≤ max a b :=
begin
convert mul_le_mul (le_max_left a b) (le_max_right a b), rw [mul_eq_self],
refine le_trans h (le_max_left a b)
end
lemma mul_eq_max_of_omega_le_left {a b : cardinal} (h : omega ≤ a) (h' : b ≠ 0) : a * b = max a b :=
begin
apply le_antisymm, apply mul_le_max_of_omega_le_left h,
cases le_or_gt omega b with hb hb, rw [mul_eq_max h hb],
have : b ≤ a, exact le_trans (le_of_lt hb) h,
rw [max_eq_left this], convert mul_le_mul_left _ (one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr h'), rw [mul_one],
end
lemma mul_eq_left {a b : cardinal} (ha : omega ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ a) (hb' : b ≠ 0) : a * b = a :=
by { rw [mul_eq_max_of_omega_le_left ha hb', max_eq_left hb] }
lemma mul_eq_right {a b : cardinal} (hb : omega ≤ b) (ha : a ≤ b) (ha' : a ≠ 0) : a * b = b :=
by { rw [mul_comm, mul_eq_left hb ha ha'] }
lemma le_mul_left {a b : cardinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a ≤ b * a :=
by { convert mul_le_mul_right _ (one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr h), rw [one_mul] }
lemma le_mul_right {a b : cardinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a ≤ a * b :=
by { rw [mul_comm], exact le_mul_left h }
lemma mul_eq_left_iff {a b : cardinal} : a * b = a ↔ ((max omega b ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0) ∨ b = 1 ∨ a = 0) :=
begin
rw [max_le_iff], split,
{ intro h,
cases (le_or_lt omega a) with ha ha,
{ have : a ≠ 0, { rintro rfl, exact not_lt_of_le ha omega_pos },
left, use ha,
{ rw [← not_lt], intro hb, apply ne_of_gt _ h, refine lt_of_lt_of_le hb (le_mul_left this) },
{ rintro rfl, apply this, rw [_root_.mul_zero] at h, subst h }},
right, by_cases h2a : a = 0, { right, exact h2a },
have hb : b ≠ 0, { rintro rfl, apply h2a, rw [mul_zero] at h, subst h },
left, rw [← h, mul_lt_omega_iff, lt_omega, lt_omega] at ha,
rcases ha with rfl|rfl|⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, ⟨m, rfl⟩⟩, contradiction, contradiction,
rw [← ne] at h2a, rw [← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at h2a hb, norm_cast at h2a hb h ⊢,
apply le_antisymm _ hb, rw [← not_lt], intro h2b,
apply ne_of_gt _ h, rw [gt], conv_lhs { rw [← mul_one n] },
rwa [mul_lt_mul_left], apply nat.lt_of_succ_le h2a },
{ rintro (⟨⟨ha, hab⟩, hb⟩|rfl|rfl),
{ rw [mul_eq_max_of_omega_le_left ha hb, max_eq_left hab] },
all_goals {simp}}
end
/- properties of add -/
theorem add_eq_self {c : cardinal} (h : omega ≤ c) : c + c = c :=
le_antisymm
(by simpa only [nat.cast_bit0, nat.cast_one, mul_eq_self h, two_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right c (le_trans (le_of_lt $ nat_lt_omega 2) h))
(le_add_left c c)
theorem add_eq_max {a b : cardinal} (ha : omega ≤ a) : a + b = max a b :=
le_antisymm
(add_eq_self (le_trans ha (le_max_left a b)) ▸
add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)) $
max_le (le_add_right _ _) (le_add_left _ _)
theorem add_lt_of_lt {a b c : cardinal} (hc : omega ≤ c)
(h1 : a < c) (h2 : b < c) : a + b < c :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add (le_max_left a b) (le_max_right a b)) $
(lt_or_le (max a b) omega).elim
(λ h, lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_omega h h) hc)
(λ h, by rw add_eq_self h; exact max_lt h1 h2)
lemma eq_of_add_eq_of_omega_le {a b c : cardinal} (h : a + b = c) (ha : a < c) (hc : omega ≤ c) :
b = c :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [← h], apply cardinal.le_add_left },
rw[← not_lt], intro hb,
have : a + b < c := add_lt_of_lt hc ha hb,
simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using this
end
lemma add_eq_left {a b : cardinal} (ha : omega ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ a) : a + b = a :=
by { rw [add_eq_max ha, max_eq_left hb] }
lemma add_eq_right {a b : cardinal} (hb : omega ≤ b) (ha : a ≤ b) : a + b = b :=
by { rw [add_comm, add_eq_left hb ha] }
lemma add_eq_left_iff {a b : cardinal} : a + b = a ↔ (max omega b ≤ a ∨ b = 0) :=
begin
rw [max_le_iff], split,
{ intro h, cases (le_or_lt omega a) with ha ha,
{ left, use ha, rw [← not_lt], intro hb, apply ne_of_gt _ h,
exact lt_of_lt_of_le hb (le_add_left b a) },
right, rw [← h, add_lt_omega_iff, lt_omega, lt_omega] at ha,
rcases ha with ⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, ⟨m, rfl⟩⟩, norm_cast at h ⊢,
rw [← add_left_inj, h, add_zero] },
{ rintro (⟨h1, h2⟩|h3), rw [add_eq_max h1, max_eq_left h2], rw [h3, add_zero] }
end
lemma add_eq_right_iff {a b : cardinal} : a + b = b ↔ (max omega a ≤ b ∨ a = 0) :=
by { rw [add_comm, add_eq_left_iff] }
lemma add_one_eq {a : cardinal} (ha : omega ≤ a) : a + 1 = a :=
have 1 ≤ a, from le_trans (le_of_lt one_lt_omega) ha,
add_eq_left ha this
protected lemma eq_of_add_eq_add_left {a b c : cardinal} (h : a + b = a + c) (ha : a < omega) :
b = c :=
begin
cases le_or_lt omega b with hb hb,
{ have : a < b := lt_of_lt_of_le ha hb,
rw [add_eq_right hb (le_of_lt this), eq_comm] at h,
rw [eq_of_add_eq_of_omega_le h this hb] },
{ have hc : c < omega,
{ rw [← not_le], intro hc,
apply lt_irrefl omega, apply lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hc (le_add_left _ a)),
rw [← h], apply add_lt_omega ha hb },
rw [lt_omega] at *,
rcases ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩, rcases hb with ⟨m, rfl⟩, rcases hc with ⟨k, rfl⟩,
norm_cast at h ⊢, apply eq_of_add_eq_add_left h }
end
protected lemma eq_of_add_eq_add_right {a b c : cardinal} (h : a + b = c + b) (hb : b < omega) :
a = c :=
by { rw [add_comm a b, add_comm c b] at h, exact cardinal.eq_of_add_eq_add_left h hb }
/- properties about power -/
theorem pow_le {κ μ : cardinal.{u}} (H1 : omega ≤ κ) (H2 : μ < omega) : κ ^ μ ≤ κ :=
let ⟨n, H3⟩ := lt_omega.1 H2 in
H3.symm ▸ (quotient.induction_on κ (λ α H1, nat.rec_on n
(le_of_lt $ lt_of_lt_of_le (by rw [nat.cast_zero, power_zero];
from one_lt_omega) H1)
(λ n ih, trans_rel_left _
(by rw [nat.cast_succ, power_add, power_one];
from mul_le_mul_right _ ih)
(mul_eq_self H1))) H1)
lemma power_self_eq {c : cardinal} (h : omega ≤ c) : c ^ c = 2 ^ c :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply le_trans (power_le_power_right $ le_of_lt $ cantor c), rw [power_mul, mul_eq_self h] },
{ convert power_le_power_right (le_trans (le_of_lt $ nat_lt_omega 2) h), apply nat.cast_two.symm }
end
lemma power_nat_le {c : cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} (h : omega ≤ c) : c ^ (n : cardinal.{u}) ≤ c :=
pow_le h (nat_lt_omega n)
lemma powerlt_omega {c : cardinal} (h : omega ≤ c) : c ^< omega = c :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [powerlt_le], intro c', rw [lt_omega], rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩, apply power_nat_le h },
convert le_powerlt one_lt_omega, rw [power_one]
end
lemma powerlt_omega_le (c : cardinal) : c ^< omega ≤ max c omega :=
begin
cases le_or_gt omega c,
{ rw [powerlt_omega h], apply le_max_left },
rw [powerlt_le], intros c' hc',
refine le_trans (le_of_lt $ power_lt_omega h hc') (le_max_right _ _)
end
/- compute cardinality of various types -/
theorem mk_list_eq_mk {α : Type u} (H1 : omega ≤ mk α) : mk (list α) = mk α :=
eq.symm $ le_antisymm ⟨⟨λ x, [x], λ x y H, (list.cons.inj H).1⟩⟩ $
calc mk (list α)
= sum (λ n : ℕ, mk α ^ (n : cardinal.{u})) : mk_list_eq_sum_pow α
... ≤ sum (λ n : ℕ, mk α) : sum_le_sum _ _ $ λ n, pow_le H1 $ nat_lt_omega n
... = sum (λ n : ulift.{u} ℕ, mk α) : quotient.sound
⟨@sigma_congr_left _ _ (λ _, quotient.out (mk α)) equiv.ulift.symm⟩
... = omega * mk α : sum_const _ _
... = max (omega) (mk α) : mul_eq_max (le_refl _) H1
... = mk α : max_eq_right H1
lemma mk_bounded_set_le_of_omega_le (α : Type u) (c : cardinal) (hα : omega ≤ mk α) :
mk {t : set α // mk t ≤ c} ≤ mk α ^ c :=
begin
refine le_trans _ (by rw [←add_one_eq hα]), refine quotient.induction_on c _, clear c, intro β,
fapply mk_le_of_surjective,
{ intro f, use sum.inl ⁻¹' range f,
refine le_trans (mk_preimage_of_injective _ _ (λ x y, sum.inl.inj)) _,
apply mk_range_le },
rintro ⟨s, ⟨g⟩⟩,
use λ y, if h : ∃(x : s), g x = y then sum.inl (classical.some h).val else sum.inr ⟨⟩,
apply subtype.eq, ext,
split,
{ rintro ⟨y, h⟩, dsimp only at h, by_cases h' : ∃ (z : s), g z = y,
{ rw [dif_pos h'] at h, cases sum.inl.inj h, exact (classical.some h').2 },
{ rw [dif_neg h'] at h, cases h }},
{ intro h, have : ∃(z : s), g z = g ⟨x, h⟩, exact ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩,
use g ⟨x, h⟩, dsimp only, rw [dif_pos this], congr',
suffices : classical.some this = ⟨x, h⟩, exact congr_arg subtype.val this,
apply g.2, exact classical.some_spec this }
end
lemma mk_bounded_set_le (α : Type u) (c : cardinal) :
mk {t : set α // mk t ≤ c} ≤ max (mk α) omega ^ c :=
begin
transitivity mk {t : set (ulift.{u} nat ⊕ α) // mk t ≤ c},
{ refine ⟨embedding.subtype_map _ _⟩, apply embedding.image,
use sum.inr, apply sum.inr.inj, intros s hs, exact le_trans mk_image_le hs },
refine le_trans
(mk_bounded_set_le_of_omega_le (ulift.{u} nat ⊕ α) c (le_add_right omega (mk α))) _,
rw [max_comm, ←add_eq_max]; refl
end
lemma mk_bounded_subset_le {α : Type u} (s : set α) (c : cardinal.{u}) :
mk {t : set α // t ⊆ s ∧ mk t ≤ c} ≤ max (mk s) omega ^ c :=
begin
refine le_trans _ (mk_bounded_set_le s c),
refine ⟨embedding.cod_restrict _ _ _⟩,
use λ t, subtype.val ⁻¹' t.1,
{ rintros ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ ⟨t', h1t', h2t'⟩ h, apply subtype.eq, dsimp only at h ⊢,
refine (preimage_eq_preimage' _ _).1 h; rw [subtype.range_val]; assumption },
rintro ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩, exact le_trans (mk_preimage_of_injective _ _ subtype.val_injective) h2t
end
/- compl -/
lemma mk_compl_of_omega_le {α : Type*} (s : set α) (h : omega ≤ #α) (h2 : #s < #α) :
#(-s : set α) = #α :=
by { refine eq_of_add_eq_of_omega_le _ h2 h, exact mk_sum_compl s }
lemma mk_compl_finset_of_omega_le {α : Type*} (s : finset α) (h : omega ≤ #α) :
#(-s.to_set : set α) = #α :=
by { apply mk_compl_of_omega_le _ h, exact lt_of_lt_of_le (finset_card_lt_omega s) h }
lemma mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_infinite {α : Type*} {s t : set α} (h : omega ≤ #α) (hs : #s < #α)
(ht : #t < #α) : #(-s : set α) = #(-t : set α) :=
by { rw [mk_compl_of_omega_le s h hs, mk_compl_of_omega_le t h ht] }
lemma mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(hα : #α < omega) (h1 : lift.{u (max v w)} (#α) = lift.{v (max u w)} (#β))
(h2 : lift.{u (max v w)} (#s) = lift.{v (max u w)} (#t)) :
lift.{u (max v w)} (#(-s : set α)) = lift.{v (max u w)} (#(-t : set β)) :=
begin
have hα' := hα, have h1' := h1,
rw [← mk_sum_compl s, ← mk_sum_compl t] at h1,
rw [← mk_sum_compl s, add_lt_omega_iff] at hα,
lift #s to ℕ using hα.1 with n hn,
lift #(- s : set α) to ℕ using hα.2 with m hm,
have : #(- t : set β) < omega,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mk_subtype_le _) _,
rw [← lift_lt, lift_omega, ← h1', ← lift_omega.{u (max v w)}, lift_lt], exact hα' },
lift #(- t : set β) to ℕ using this with k hk,
simp [nat_eq_lift_eq_iff] at h2, rw [nat_eq_lift_eq_iff.{v (max u w)}] at h2,
simp [h2.symm] at h1 ⊢, norm_cast at h1, simp at h1, exact h1
end
lemma mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite {α β : Type u} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(hα : #α < omega) (h1 : #α = #β) (h : #s = #t) : #(-s : set α) = #(-t : set β) :=
by { rw [← lift_inj], apply mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite_lift hα; rw [lift_inj]; assumption }
lemma mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite_same {α : Type*} {s t : set α} (hα : #α < omega)
(h : #s = #t) : #(-s : set α) = #(-t : set α) :=
mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite hα rfl h
/- extend an injection to an equiv -/
theorem extend_function {α β : Type*} {s : set α} (f : s ↪ β)
(h : nonempty ((-s : set α) ≃ (- range f : set β))) :
∃ (g : α ≃ β), ∀ x : s, g x = f x :=
begin
intros, have := h, cases this with g,
let h : α ≃ β := (set.sum_compl (s : set α)).symm.trans
((sum_congr (equiv.set.range f f.2) g).trans
(set.sum_compl (range f))),
refine ⟨h, _⟩, rintro ⟨x, hx⟩, simp [set.sum_compl_symm_apply_of_mem, hx, equiv.symm]
end
theorem extend_function_finite {α β : Type*} {s : set α} (f : s ↪ β)
(hs : #α < omega) (h : nonempty (α ≃ β)) : ∃ (g : α ≃ β), ∀ x : s, g x = f x :=
begin
apply extend_function f,
have := h, cases this with g,
rw [← lift_mk_eq] at h,
rw [←lift_mk_eq, mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite_lift hs h],
rw [mk_range_eq_lift], exact f.2
end
theorem extend_function_of_lt {α β : Type*} {s : set α} (f : s ↪ β) (hs : #s < #α)
(h : nonempty (α ≃ β)) : ∃ (g : α ≃ β), ∀ x : s, g x = f x :=
begin
cases (le_or_lt omega (#α)) with hα hα,
{ apply extend_function f, have := h, cases this with g, rw [← lift_mk_eq] at h,
cases cardinal.eq.mp (mk_compl_of_omega_le s hα hs) with g2,
cases cardinal.eq.mp (mk_compl_of_omega_le (range f) _ _) with g3,
{ constructor, exact g2.trans (g.trans g3.symm) },
{ rw [← lift_le, ← h], refine le_trans _ (lift_le.mpr hα), simp },
rwa [← lift_lt, ← h, mk_range_eq_lift, lift_lt], exact f.2 },
{ exact extend_function_finite f hα h }
end
end cardinal
|
972017c6b412c53bac2594cdb937a4fc166b34c9 | d436468d80b739ba7e06843c4d0d2070e43448e5 | /src/topology/metric_space/closeds.lean | 6d0c365c17c6b8fb6eb445fa6aaeea1e632ebe3a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | roro47/mathlib | 761fdc002aef92f77818f3fef06bf6ec6fc1a28e | 80aa7d52537571a2ca62a3fdf71c9533a09422cf | refs/heads/master | 1,599,656,410,625 | 1,573,649,488,000 | 1,573,649,488,000 | 221,452,951 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,573,647,693,000 | 1,573,647,692,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,063 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Sébastien Gouëzel
The metric and emetric space structure on the types of closed subsets and nonempty compact
subsets of a metric or emetric space
The Hausdorff distance induces an emetric space structure on the type of closed subsets
of an emetric space, called `closeds`. Its completeness, resp. compactness, resp.
second-countability, follow from the corresponding properties of the original space.
In a metric space, the type of nonempty compact subsets (called `nonempty_compacts`) also
inherits a metric space structure from the Hausdorff distance, as the Hausdorff edistance is
always finite in this context.
-/
import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance topology.opens
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
open_locale topological_space
universe u
open classical lattice set function topological_space filter
namespace emetric
section
variables {α : Type u} [emetric_space α] {s : set α}
/-- In emetric spaces, the Hausdorff edistance defines an emetric space structure
on the type of closed subsets -/
instance closeds.emetric_space : emetric_space (closeds α) :=
{ edist := λs t, Hausdorff_edist s.val t.val,
edist_self := λs, Hausdorff_edist_self,
edist_comm := λs t, Hausdorff_edist_comm,
edist_triangle := λs t u, Hausdorff_edist_triangle,
eq_of_edist_eq_zero :=
λs t h, subtype.eq ((Hausdorff_edist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed s.property t.property).1 h) }
/-- The edistance to a closed set depends continuously on the point and the set -/
lemma continuous_inf_edist_Hausdorff_edist :
continuous (λp : α × (closeds α), inf_edist p.1 (p.2).val) :=
begin
refine continuous_of_le_add_edist 2 (by simp) _,
rintros ⟨x, s⟩ ⟨y, t⟩,
calc inf_edist x (s.val) ≤ inf_edist x (t.val) + Hausdorff_edist (t.val) (s.val) :
inf_edist_le_inf_edist_add_Hausdorff_edist
... ≤ (inf_edist y (t.val) + edist x y) + Hausdorff_edist (t.val) (s.val) :
add_le_add_right' inf_edist_le_inf_edist_add_edist
... = inf_edist y (t.val) + (edist x y + Hausdorff_edist (s.val) (t.val)) :
by simp [add_comm, Hausdorff_edist_comm]
... ≤ inf_edist y (t.val) + (edist (x, s) (y, t) + edist (x, s) (y, t)) :
add_le_add_left' (add_le_add' (by simp [edist, le_refl]) (by simp [edist, le_refl]))
... = inf_edist y (t.val) + 2 * edist (x, s) (y, t) :
by rw [← mul_two, mul_comm]
end
/-- Subsets of a given closed subset form a closed set -/
lemma is_closed_subsets_of_is_closed (hs : is_closed s) :
is_closed {t : closeds α | t.val ⊆ s} :=
begin
refine is_closed_of_closure_subset (λt ht x hx, _),
-- t : closeds α, ht : t ∈ closure {t : closeds α | t.val ⊆ s},
-- x : α, hx : x ∈ t.val
-- goal : x ∈ s
have : x ∈ closure s,
{ refine mem_closure_iff'.2 (λε εpos, _),
rcases mem_closure_iff'.1 ht ε εpos with ⟨u, hu, Dtu⟩,
-- u : closeds α, hu : u ∈ {t : closeds α | t.val ⊆ s}, hu' : edist t u < ε
rcases exists_edist_lt_of_Hausdorff_edist_lt hx Dtu with ⟨y, hy, Dxy⟩,
-- y : α, hy : y ∈ u.val, Dxy : edist x y < ε
exact ⟨y, hu hy, Dxy⟩ },
rwa closure_eq_of_is_closed hs at this,
end
/-- By definition, the edistance on `closeds α` is given by the Hausdorff edistance -/
lemma closeds.edist_eq {s t : closeds α} : edist s t = Hausdorff_edist s.val t.val := rfl
/-- In a complete space, the type of closed subsets is complete for the
Hausdorff edistance. -/
instance closeds.complete_space [complete_space α] : complete_space (closeds α) :=
begin
/- We will show that, if a sequence of sets `s n` satisfies
`edist (s n) (s (n+1)) < 2^{-n}`, then it converges. This is enough to guarantee
completeness, by a standard completeness criterion.
We use the shorthand `B n = 2^{-n}` in ennreal. -/
let B : ℕ → ennreal := ennreal.half_pow,
/- Consider a sequence of closed sets `s n` with `edist (s n) (s (n+1)) < B n`.
We will show that it converges. The limit set is t0 = ⋂n, closure (⋃m≥n, s m).
We will have to show that a point in `s n` is close to a point in `t0`, and a point
in `t0` is close to a point in `s n`. The completeness then follows from a
standard criterion. -/
refine complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences _ ennreal.half_pow_pos (λs hs, _),
let t0 := ⋂n, closure (⋃m≥n, (s m).val),
have : is_closed t0 := is_closed_Inter (λ_, is_closed_closure),
let t : closeds α := ⟨t0, this⟩,
use t,
have I1 : ∀n:ℕ, ∀x ∈ (s n).val, ∃y ∈ t0, edist x y ≤ 2 * B n,
{ /- This is the main difficulty of the proof. Starting from `x ∈ s n`, we want
to find a point in `t0` which is close to `x`. Define inductively a sequence of
points `z m` with `z n = x` and `z m ∈ s m` and `edist (z m) (z (m+1)) ≤ B m`. This is
possible since the Hausdorff distance between `s m` and `s (m+1)` is at most `B m`.
This sequence is a Cauchy sequence, therefore converging as the space is complete, to
a limit which satisfies the required properties. -/
assume n x hx,
haveI : nonempty α := ⟨x⟩,
let z : ℕ → α := λk, nat.rec_on k x (λl z, if l < n then x else
epsilon (λy, y ∈ (s (l+1)).val ∧ edist z y < B l)),
have z_le_n : ∀l≤n, z l = x,
{ assume l hl,
cases l with m,
{ show z 0 = x, from rfl },
{ have : z (nat.succ m) = ite (m < n) x (epsilon (λ (y : α), y ∈ (s (m + 1)).val ∧ edist (z m) y < B m))
:= rfl,
rw this,
simp [nat.lt_of_succ_le hl] }},
have : z n = x := z_le_n n (le_refl n),
-- check by induction that the sequence `z m` satisfies the required properties
have I : ∀m≥n, z m ∈ (s m).val → (z (m+1) ∈ (s (m+1)).val ∧ edist (z m) (z (m+1)) < B m),
{ assume m hm hz,
have E : ∃y, y ∈ (s (m+1)).val ∧ edist (z m) y < B m,
{ have : Hausdorff_edist (s m).val (s (m+1)).val < B m := hs m m (m+1) (le_refl _) (by simp),
rcases exists_edist_lt_of_Hausdorff_edist_lt hz this with ⟨y, hy, Dy⟩,
exact ⟨y, ⟨hy, Dy⟩⟩ },
have : z (m+1) = ite (m < n) x (epsilon (λ (y : α), y ∈ (s (m + 1)).val ∧ edist (z m) y < B m)) := rfl,
rw this,
simp only [not_lt_of_le hm, if_false],
exact epsilon_spec E },
have z_in_s : ∀m≥n, z m ∈ (s m).val :=
nat.le_induction (by rwa ‹z n = x›) (λm hm zm, (I m hm zm).1),
-- for all `m`, the distance between `z m` and `z (m+1)` is controlled by `B m`:
-- for `m ≥ n`, this follows from the construction, while for `m < n` all points are `x`.
have Im_succm : ∀m, edist (z m) (z (m+1)) ≤ B m,
{ assume m,
by_cases hm : n≤m,
{ exact le_of_lt (I m hm (z_in_s m hm)).2 },
{ rw not_le at hm,
have Im : z m = x := z_le_n m (le_of_lt hm),
have Im' : z (m+1) = x := z_le_n (m+1) (nat.succ_le_of_lt hm),
simp [Im, Im', ennreal.half_pow_pos] }},
/- From the distance control between `z m` and `z (m+1)`, we deduce a distance control
between `z k` and `z l` by summing the geometric series. -/
have Iz : ∀k l N, N ≤ k → N ≤ l → edist (z k) (z l) ≤ 2 * B N :=
λk l N hk hl, ennreal.edist_le_two_mul_half_pow hk hl Im_succm,
-- it follows from the previous bound that `z` is a Cauchy sequence
have : cauchy_seq z := ennreal.cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_half_pow Im_succm,
-- therefore, it converges
rcases cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_complete this with ⟨y, y_lim⟩,
-- the limit point `y` will be the desired point, in `t0` and close to our initial point `x`.
-- First, we check it belongs to `t0`.
have : y ∈ t0 := mem_Inter.2 (λk, mem_closure_of_tendsto (by simp) y_lim
begin
simp only [exists_prop, set.mem_Union, filter.mem_at_top_sets, set.mem_preimage, set.preimage_Union],
exact ⟨max n k, λm hm, ⟨m, ⟨le_trans (le_max_right _ _) hm, z_in_s m (le_trans (le_max_left _ _) hm)⟩⟩⟩,
end),
-- Then, we check that `y` is close to `x = z n`. This follows from the fact that `y`
-- is the limit of `z k`, and the distance between `z n` and `z k` has already been estimated.
have : edist x y ≤ 2 * B n,
{ refine le_of_tendsto (by simp) (tendsto_edist tendsto_const_nhds y_lim) _,
simp [‹z n = x›.symm],
exact ⟨n, λm hm, Iz n m n (le_refl n) hm⟩ },
-- Conclusion of this argument: the point `y` satisfies the required properties.
exact ⟨y, ‹y ∈ t0›, ‹edist x y ≤ 2 * B n›⟩ },
have I2 : ∀n:ℕ, ∀x ∈ t0, ∃y ∈ (s n).val, edist x y ≤ 2 * B n,
{ /- For the (much easier) reverse inequality, we start from a point `x ∈ t0` and we want
to find a point `y ∈ s n` which is close to `x`.
`x` belongs to `t0`, the intersection of the closures. In particular, it is well
approximated by a point `z` in `⋃m≥n, s m`, say in `s m`. Since `s m` and
`s n` are close, this point is itself well approximated by a point `y` in `s n`,
as required. -/
assume n x xt0,
have : x ∈ closure (⋃m≥n, (s m).val), by apply mem_Inter.1 xt0 n,
rcases mem_closure_iff'.1 this (B n) (ennreal.half_pow_pos n) with ⟨z, hz, Dxz⟩,
-- z : α, Dxz : edist x z < B n,
simp only [exists_prop, set.mem_Union] at hz,
rcases hz with ⟨m, ⟨m_ge_n, hm⟩⟩,
-- m : ℕ, m_ge_n : m ≥ n, hm : z ∈ (s m).val
have : Hausdorff_edist (s m).val (s n).val < B n := hs n m n m_ge_n (le_refl n),
rcases exists_edist_lt_of_Hausdorff_edist_lt hm this with ⟨y, hy, Dzy⟩,
-- y : α, hy : y ∈ (s n).val, Dzy : edist z y < B n
exact ⟨y, hy, calc
edist x y ≤ edist x z + edist z y : edist_triangle _ _ _
... ≤ B n + B n : add_le_add' (le_of_lt Dxz) (le_of_lt Dzy)
... = 2 * B n : (two_mul _).symm ⟩ },
-- Deduce from the above inequalities that the distance between `s n` and `t0` is at most `2 B n`.
have main : ∀n:ℕ, edist (s n) t ≤ 2 * B n := λn, Hausdorff_edist_le_of_mem_edist (I1 n) (I2 n),
-- from this, the convergence of `s n` to `t0` follows.
refine (tendsto_at_top _).2 (λε εpos, _),
have : tendsto (λn, 2 * ennreal.half_pow n) at_top (𝓝 (2 * 0)) :=
ennreal.tendsto_mul_right ennreal.half_pow_tendsto_zero (by simp),
rw mul_zero at this,
have Z := (tendsto_orderable.1 this).2 ε εpos,
simp only [filter.mem_at_top_sets, set.mem_set_of_eq] at Z,
rcases Z with ⟨N, hN⟩, -- ∀ (b : ℕ), b ≥ N → ε > 2 * B b
exact ⟨N, λn hn, lt_of_le_of_lt (main n) (hN n hn)⟩
end
/-- In a compact space, the type of closed subsets is compact. -/
instance closeds.compact_space [compact_space α] : compact_space (closeds α) :=
⟨begin
/- by completeness, it suffices to show that it is totally bounded,
i.e., for all ε>0, there is a finite set which is ε-dense.
start from a set `s` which is ε-dense in α. Then the subsets of `s`
are finitely many, and ε-dense for the Hausdorff distance. -/
refine compact_of_totally_bounded_is_closed (emetric.totally_bounded_iff.2 (λε εpos, _)) is_closed_univ,
rcases dense εpos with ⟨δ, δpos, δlt⟩,
rcases emetric.totally_bounded_iff.1 (compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete.1 (@compact_univ α _ _)).1 δ δpos
with ⟨s, fs, hs⟩,
-- s : set α, fs : finite s, hs : univ ⊆ ⋃ (y : α) (H : y ∈ s), eball y δ
-- we first show that any set is well approximated by a subset of `s`.
have main : ∀ u : set α, ∃v ⊆ s, Hausdorff_edist u v ≤ δ,
{ assume u,
let v := {x : α | x ∈ s ∧ ∃y∈u, edist x y < δ},
existsi [v, ((λx hx, hx.1) : v ⊆ s)],
refine Hausdorff_edist_le_of_mem_edist _ _,
{ assume x hx,
have : x ∈ ⋃y ∈ s, ball y δ := hs (by simp),
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 this with ⟨y, ⟨ys, dy⟩⟩,
have : edist y x < δ := by simp at dy; rwa [edist_comm] at dy,
exact ⟨y, ⟨ys, ⟨x, hx, this⟩⟩, le_of_lt dy⟩ },
{ rintros x ⟨hx1, ⟨y, yu, hy⟩⟩,
exact ⟨y, yu, le_of_lt hy⟩ }},
-- introduce the set F of all subsets of `s` (seen as members of `closeds α`).
let F := {f : closeds α | f.val ⊆ s},
use F,
split,
-- `F` is finite
{ apply @finite_of_finite_image _ _ F (λf, f.val),
{ apply set.inj_on_of_injective, simp [subtype.val_injective] },
{ refine finite_subset (finite_subsets_of_finite fs) (λb, _),
simp only [and_imp, set.mem_image, set.mem_set_of_eq, exists_imp_distrib],
assume x hx hx',
rwa hx' at hx }},
-- `F` is ε-dense
{ assume u _,
rcases main u.val with ⟨t0, t0s, Dut0⟩,
have : finite t0 := finite_subset fs t0s,
have : is_closed t0 := closed_of_compact _ (compact_of_finite this),
let t : closeds α := ⟨t0, this⟩,
have : t ∈ F := t0s,
have : edist u t < ε := lt_of_le_of_lt Dut0 δlt,
apply mem_bUnion_iff.2,
exact ⟨t, ‹t ∈ F›, this⟩ }
end⟩
/-- In an emetric space, the type of non-empty compact subsets is an emetric space,
where the edistance is the Hausdorff edistance -/
instance nonempty_compacts.emetric_space : emetric_space (nonempty_compacts α) :=
{ edist := λs t, Hausdorff_edist s.val t.val,
edist_self := λs, Hausdorff_edist_self,
edist_comm := λs t, Hausdorff_edist_comm,
edist_triangle := λs t u, Hausdorff_edist_triangle,
eq_of_edist_eq_zero := λs t h, subtype.eq $ begin
have : closure (s.val) = closure (t.val) := Hausdorff_edist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure.1 h,
rwa [closure_eq_iff_is_closed.2 (closed_of_compact _ s.property.2),
closure_eq_iff_is_closed.2 (closed_of_compact _ t.property.2)] at this,
end }
/-- `nonempty_compacts.to_closeds` is a uniform embedding (as it is an isometry) -/
lemma nonempty_compacts.to_closeds.uniform_embedding :
uniform_embedding (@nonempty_compacts.to_closeds α _ _) :=
isometry.uniform_embedding $ λx y, rfl
/-- The range of `nonempty_compacts.to_closeds` is closed in a complete space -/
lemma nonempty_compacts.is_closed_in_closeds [complete_space α] :
is_closed (nonempty_compacts.to_closeds '' (univ : set (nonempty_compacts α))) :=
begin
have : nonempty_compacts.to_closeds '' univ = {s : closeds α | s.val ≠ ∅ ∧ compact s.val},
{ ext,
simp only [set.image_univ, set.mem_range, ne.def, set.mem_set_of_eq],
split,
{ rintros ⟨y, hy⟩,
have : x.val = y.val := by rcases hy; simp,
rw this,
exact y.property },
{ rintros ⟨hx1, hx2⟩,
existsi (⟨x.val, ⟨hx1, hx2⟩⟩ : nonempty_compacts α),
apply subtype.eq,
refl }},
rw this,
refine is_closed_of_closure_subset (λs hs, _),
split,
{ -- take a set set t which is nonempty and at distance at most 1 of s
rcases mem_closure_iff'.1 hs 1 ennreal.zero_lt_one with ⟨t, ht, Dst⟩,
rw edist_comm at Dst,
-- this set t contains a point x
rcases ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.1 ht.1 with ⟨x, hx⟩,
-- by the Hausdorff distance control, this point x is at distance at most 1
-- of a point y in s
rcases exists_edist_lt_of_Hausdorff_edist_lt hx Dst with ⟨y, hy, _⟩,
-- this shows that s is not empty
exact ne_empty_of_mem hy },
{ refine compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete.2 ⟨_, is_complete_of_is_closed s.property⟩,
refine totally_bounded_iff.2 (λε εpos, _),
-- we have to show that s is covered by finitely many eballs of radius ε
-- pick a nonempty compact set t at distance at most ε/2 of s
rcases mem_closure_iff'.1 hs (ε/2) (ennreal.half_pos εpos) with ⟨t, ht, Dst⟩,
-- cover this space with finitely many balls of radius ε/2
rcases totally_bounded_iff.1 (compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete.1 ht.2).1 (ε/2) (ennreal.half_pos εpos)
with ⟨u, fu, ut⟩,
refine ⟨u, ⟨fu, λx hx, _⟩⟩,
-- u : set α, fu : finite u, ut : t.val ⊆ ⋃ (y : α) (H : y ∈ u), eball y (ε / 2)
-- then s is covered by the union of the balls centered at u of radius ε
rcases exists_edist_lt_of_Hausdorff_edist_lt hx Dst with ⟨z, hz, Dxz⟩,
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 (ut hz) with ⟨y, hy, Dzy⟩,
have : edist x y < ε := calc
edist x y ≤ edist x z + edist z y : edist_triangle _ _ _
... < ε/2 + ε/2 : ennreal.add_lt_add Dxz Dzy
... = ε : ennreal.add_halves _,
exact mem_bUnion hy this },
end
/-- In a complete space, the type of nonempty compact subsets is complete. This follows
from the same statement for closed subsets -/
instance nonempty_compacts.complete_space [complete_space α] : complete_space (nonempty_compacts α) :=
begin
apply complete_space_of_is_complete_univ,
apply (is_complete_image_iff nonempty_compacts.to_closeds.uniform_embedding).1,
apply is_complete_of_is_closed,
exact nonempty_compacts.is_closed_in_closeds
end
/-- In a compact space, the type of nonempty compact subsets is compact. This follows from
the same statement for closed subsets -/
instance nonempty_compacts.compact_space [compact_space α] : compact_space (nonempty_compacts α) :=
⟨begin
rw compact_iff_compact_image_of_embedding nonempty_compacts.to_closeds.uniform_embedding.embedding,
exact compact_of_closed nonempty_compacts.is_closed_in_closeds
end⟩
/-- In a second countable space, the type of nonempty compact subsets is second countable -/
instance nonempty_compacts.second_countable_topology [second_countable_topology α] :
second_countable_topology (nonempty_compacts α) :=
begin
haveI : separable_space (nonempty_compacts α) :=
begin
/- To obtain a countable dense subset of `nonempty_compacts α`, start from
a countable dense subset `s` of α, and then consider all its finite nonempty subsets.
This set is countable and made of nonempty compact sets. It turns out to be dense:
by total boundedness, any compact set `t` can be covered by finitely many small balls, and
approximations in `s` of the centers of these balls give the required finite approximation
of `t`. -/
have : separable_space α := by apply_instance,
rcases this.exists_countable_closure_eq_univ with ⟨s, cs, s_dense⟩,
let v0 := {t : set α | finite t ∧ t ⊆ s},
let v : set (nonempty_compacts α) := {t : nonempty_compacts α | t.val ∈ v0},
refine ⟨⟨v, ⟨_, _⟩⟩⟩,
{ have : countable (subtype.val '' v),
{ refine countable_subset (λx hx, _) (countable_set_of_finite_subset cs),
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hx with ⟨y, ⟨hy, yx⟩⟩,
rw ← yx,
exact hy },
apply countable_of_injective_of_countable_image _ this,
apply inj_on_of_inj_on_of_subset (injective_iff_inj_on_univ.1 subtype.val_injective)
(subset_univ _) },
{ refine subset.antisymm (subset_univ _) (λt ht, mem_closure_iff'.2 (λε εpos, _)),
-- t is a compact nonempty set, that we have to approximate uniformly by a a set in `v`.
rcases dense εpos with ⟨δ, δpos, δlt⟩,
-- construct a map F associating to a point in α an approximating point in s, up to δ/2.
have Exy : ∀x, ∃y, y ∈ s ∧ edist x y < δ/2,
{ assume x,
have : x ∈ closure s := by rw s_dense; exact mem_univ _,
rcases mem_closure_iff'.1 this (δ/2) (ennreal.half_pos δpos) with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩,
exact ⟨y, ⟨ys, hy⟩⟩ },
let F := λx, some (Exy x),
have Fspec : ∀x, F x ∈ s ∧ edist x (F x) < δ/2 := λx, some_spec (Exy x),
-- cover `t` with finitely many balls. Their centers form a set `a`
have : totally_bounded t.val := (compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete.1 t.property.2).1,
rcases totally_bounded_iff.1 this (δ/2) (ennreal.half_pos δpos) with ⟨a, af, ta⟩,
-- a : set α, af : finite a, ta : t.val ⊆ ⋃ (y : α) (H : y ∈ a), eball y (δ / 2)
-- replace each center by a nearby approximation in `s`, giving a new set `b`
let b := F '' a,
have : finite b := finite_image _ af,
have tb : ∀x ∈ t.val, ∃y ∈ b, edist x y < δ,
{ assume x hx,
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 (ta hx) with ⟨z, za, Dxz⟩,
existsi [F z, mem_image_of_mem _ za],
calc edist x (F z) ≤ edist x z + edist z (F z) : edist_triangle _ _ _
... < δ/2 + δ/2 : ennreal.add_lt_add Dxz (Fspec z).2
... = δ : ennreal.add_halves _ },
-- keep only the points in `b` that are close to point in `t`, yielding a new set `c`
let c := {y ∈ b | ∃x∈t.val, edist x y < δ},
have : finite c := finite_subset ‹finite b› (λx hx, hx.1),
-- points in `t` are well approximated by points in `c`
have tc : ∀x ∈ t.val, ∃y ∈ c, edist x y ≤ δ,
{ assume x hx,
rcases tb x hx with ⟨y, yv, Dxy⟩,
have : y ∈ c := by simp [c, -mem_image]; exact ⟨yv, ⟨x, hx, Dxy⟩⟩,
exact ⟨y, this, le_of_lt Dxy⟩ },
-- points in `c` are well approximated by points in `t`
have ct : ∀y ∈ c, ∃x ∈ t.val, edist y x ≤ δ,
{ rintros y ⟨hy1, ⟨x, xt, Dyx⟩⟩,
have : edist y x ≤ δ := calc
edist y x = edist x y : edist_comm _ _
... ≤ δ : le_of_lt Dyx,
exact ⟨x, xt, this⟩ },
-- it follows that their Hausdorff distance is small
have : Hausdorff_edist t.val c ≤ δ :=
Hausdorff_edist_le_of_mem_edist tc ct,
have Dtc : Hausdorff_edist t.val c < ε := lt_of_le_of_lt this δlt,
-- the set `c` is not empty, as it is well approximated by a nonempty set
have : c ≠ ∅,
{ by_contradiction h,
simp only [not_not, ne.def] at h,
rw [h, Hausdorff_edist_empty t.property.1] at Dtc,
exact not_top_lt Dtc },
-- let `d` be the version of `c` in the type `nonempty_compacts α`
let d : nonempty_compacts α := ⟨c, ⟨‹c ≠ ∅›, compact_of_finite ‹finite c›⟩⟩,
have : c ⊆ s,
{ assume x hx,
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hx.1 with ⟨y, ⟨ya, yx⟩⟩,
rw ← yx,
exact (Fspec y).1 },
have : d ∈ v := ⟨‹finite c›, this⟩,
-- we have proved that `d` is a good approximation of `t` as requested
exact ⟨d, ‹d ∈ v›, Dtc⟩ },
end,
apply second_countable_of_separable,
end
end --section
end emetric --namespace
namespace metric
section
variables {α : Type u} [metric_space α]
/-- `nonempty_compacts α` inherits a metric space structure, as the Hausdorff
edistance between two such sets is finite. -/
instance nonempty_compacts.metric_space : metric_space (nonempty_compacts α) :=
emetric_space.to_metric_space $ λx y, Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_ne_empty_of_bounded x.2.1 y.2.1
(bounded_of_compact x.2.2) (bounded_of_compact y.2.2)
/-- The distance on `nonempty_compacts α` is the Hausdorff distance, by construction -/
lemma nonempty_compacts.dist_eq {x y : nonempty_compacts α} :
dist x y = Hausdorff_dist x.val y.val := rfl
lemma uniform_continuous_inf_dist_Hausdorff_dist :
uniform_continuous (λp : α × (nonempty_compacts α), inf_dist p.1 (p.2).val) :=
begin
refine uniform_continuous_of_le_add 2 _,
rintros ⟨x, s⟩ ⟨y, t⟩,
calc inf_dist x (s.val) ≤ inf_dist x (t.val) + Hausdorff_dist (t.val) (s.val) :
inf_dist_le_inf_dist_add_Hausdorff_dist (edist_ne_top t s)
... ≤ (inf_dist y (t.val) + dist x y) + Hausdorff_dist (t.val) (s.val) :
add_le_add_right inf_dist_le_inf_dist_add_dist _
... = inf_dist y (t.val) + (dist x y + Hausdorff_dist (s.val) (t.val)) :
by simp [add_comm, Hausdorff_dist_comm]
... ≤ inf_dist y (t.val) + (dist (x, s) (y, t) + dist (x, s) (y, t)) :
add_le_add_left (add_le_add (by simp [dist, le_refl]) (by simp [dist, nonempty_compacts.dist_eq, le_refl])) _
... = inf_dist y (t.val) + 2 * dist (x, s) (y, t) :
by rw [← mul_two, mul_comm]
end
end --section
end metric --namespace
|
42cd3d3236101f8b942a2b018f3cf0454d680a0c | a46270e2f76a375564f3b3e9c1bf7b635edc1f2c | /7.1.lean | 825fbd54ad08812ca26ed54f26521e14cec79ead | [
"CC0-1.0"
] | permissive | wudcscheme/lean-exercise | 88ea2506714eac343de2a294d1132ee8ee6d3a20 | 5b23b9be3d361fff5e981d5be3a0a1175504b9f6 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,958,930,293 | 1,583,197,205,000 | 1,583,197,205,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 800 | lean | namespace hidden
inductive empty : Type
#check empty.cases_on
inductive unit : Type
| star : unit
#check unit.star
#check unit.cases_on
def k42: unit -> ℕ := λ _, 42
inductive bool : Type
| ff : bool
| tt : bool
#check bool.ff
#check bool.tt
#check bool.cases_on
def band: bool -> bool -> bool := λ (x y), bool.cases_on x bool.ff y
#reduce band bool.tt bool.tt
#reduce band bool.tt bool.ff
#reduce band bool.ff bool.tt
#reduce band bool.ff bool.ff
def bor: bool -> bool -> bool := λ (x y), bool.cases_on x y bool.tt
#reduce bor bool.tt bool.tt
#reduce bor bool.tt bool.ff
#reduce bor bool.ff bool.tt
#reduce bor bool.ff bool.ff
def bnot: bool -> bool := fun x, bool.cases_on x bool.tt bool.ff
#reduce bnot bool.tt
#reduce bnot bool.ff
end hidden |
51ee4929fec453be8e6e773f66cb3850a3fb77bf | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/typeclass_outparam.lean | 912a3af3b8ec734b5214a11ad55b1f198832b961 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 164 | lean |
class OPClass (α : outParam Type) (β : Type) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
instance op₁ : OPClass Nat Nat := {}
set_option pp.all true
#synth OPClass Nat Nat
|
5692c5020bad4bb678bfea79f7c5905ab9116a00 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/terminal.lean | e03125ebff23aedc2e762186b47cefc98871cbe7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,135 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.pempty
import category_theory.limits.limits
/-!
# Initial and terminal objects in a category.
## References
* [Stacks: Initial and final objects](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002B)
-/
noncomputable theory
universes v u
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.limits
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
/-- Construct a cone for the empty diagram given an object. -/
@[simps] def as_empty_cone (X : C) : cone (functor.empty C) := { X := X, π := by tidy }
/-- Construct a cocone for the empty diagram given an object. -/
@[simps] def as_empty_cocone (X : C) : cocone (functor.empty C) := { X := X, ι := by tidy }
/-- `X` is terminal if the cone it induces on the empty diagram is limiting. -/
abbreviation is_terminal (X : C) := is_limit (as_empty_cone X)
/-- `X` is initial if the cocone it induces on the empty diagram is colimiting. -/
abbreviation is_initial (X : C) := is_colimit (as_empty_cocone X)
/-- Give the morphism to a terminal object from any other. -/
def is_terminal.from {X : C} (t : is_terminal X) (Y : C) : Y ⟶ X :=
t.lift (as_empty_cone Y)
/-- Any two morphisms to a terminal object are equal. -/
lemma is_terminal.hom_ext {X Y : C} (t : is_terminal X) (f g : Y ⟶ X) : f = g :=
t.hom_ext (by tidy)
/-- Give the morphism from an initial object to any other. -/
def is_initial.to {X : C} (t : is_initial X) (Y : C) : X ⟶ Y :=
t.desc (as_empty_cocone Y)
/-- Any two morphisms from an initial object are equal. -/
lemma is_initial.hom_ext {X Y : C} (t : is_initial X) (f g : X ⟶ Y) : f = g :=
t.hom_ext (by tidy)
/-- Any morphism from a terminal object is mono. -/
lemma is_terminal.mono_from {X Y : C} (t : is_terminal X) (f : X ⟶ Y) : mono f :=
⟨λ Z g h eq, t.hom_ext _ _⟩
/-- Any morphism to an initial object is epi. -/
lemma is_initial.epi_to {X Y : C} (t : is_initial X) (f : Y ⟶ X) : epi f :=
⟨λ Z g h eq, t.hom_ext _ _⟩
variable (C)
/--
A category has a terminal object if it has a limit over the empty diagram.
Use `has_terminal_of_unique` to construct instances.
-/
abbreviation has_terminal := has_limits_of_shape (discrete pempty) C
/--
A category has an initial object if it has a colimit over the empty diagram.
Use `has_initial_of_unique` to construct instances.
-/
abbreviation has_initial := has_colimits_of_shape (discrete pempty) C
/--
An arbitrary choice of terminal object, if one exists.
You can use the notation `⊤_ C`.
This object is characterized by having a unique morphism from any object.
-/
abbreviation terminal [has_terminal C] : C := limit (functor.empty C)
/--
An arbitrary choice of initial object, if one exists.
You can use the notation `⊥_ C`.
This object is characterized by having a unique morphism to any object.
-/
abbreviation initial [has_initial C] : C := colimit (functor.empty C)
notation `⊤_` C:20 := terminal C
notation `⊥_` C:20 := initial C
section
variables {C}
/-- We can more explicitly show that a category has a terminal object by specifying the object,
and showing there is a unique morphism to it from any other object. -/
lemma has_terminal_of_unique (X : C) [h : Π Y : C, unique (Y ⟶ X)] : has_terminal C :=
{ has_limit := λ F, has_limit.mk
{ cone := { X := X, π := { app := pempty.rec _ } },
is_limit := { lift := λ s, (h s.X).default } } }
/-- We can more explicitly show that a category has an initial object by specifying the object,
and showing there is a unique morphism from it to any other object. -/
lemma has_initial_of_unique (X : C) [h : Π Y : C, unique (X ⟶ Y)] : has_initial C :=
{ has_colimit := λ F, has_colimit.mk
{ cocone := { X := X, ι := { app := pempty.rec _ } },
is_colimit := { desc := λ s, (h s.X).default } } }
/-- The map from an object to the terminal object. -/
abbreviation terminal.from [has_terminal C] (P : C) : P ⟶ ⊤_ C :=
limit.lift (functor.empty C) (as_empty_cone P)
/-- The map to an object from the initial object. -/
abbreviation initial.to [has_initial C] (P : C) : ⊥_ C ⟶ P :=
colimit.desc (functor.empty C) (as_empty_cocone P)
instance unique_to_terminal [has_terminal C] (P : C) : unique (P ⟶ ⊤_ C) :=
{ default := terminal.from P,
uniq := λ m, by { apply limit.hom_ext, rintro ⟨⟩ } }
instance unique_from_initial [has_initial C] (P : C) : unique (⊥_ C ⟶ P) :=
{ default := initial.to P,
uniq := λ m, by { apply colimit.hom_ext, rintro ⟨⟩ } }
/-- A terminal object is terminal. -/
def terminal_is_terminal [has_terminal C] : is_terminal (⊤_ C) :=
{ lift := λ s, terminal.from _ }
/-- An initial object is initial. -/
def initial_is_initial [has_initial C] : is_initial (⊥_ C) :=
{ desc := λ s, initial.to _ }
/-- Any morphism from a terminal object is mono. -/
instance terminal.mono_from {Y : C} [has_terminal C] (f : ⊤_ C ⟶ Y) : mono f :=
is_terminal.mono_from terminal_is_terminal _
/-- Any morphism to an initial object is epi. -/
instance initial.epi_to {Y : C} [has_initial C] (f : Y ⟶ ⊥_ C) : epi f :=
is_initial.epi_to initial_is_initial _
/-- An initial object is terminal in the opposite category. -/
def terminal_op_of_initial {X : C} (t : is_initial X) : is_terminal (opposite.op X) :=
{ lift := λ s, (t.to s.X.unop).op,
uniq' := λ s m w, has_hom.hom.unop_inj (t.hom_ext _ _) }
/-- An initial object in the opposite category is terminal in the original category. -/
def terminal_unop_of_initial {X : Cᵒᵖ} (t : is_initial X) : is_terminal X.unop :=
{ lift := λ s, (t.to (opposite.op s.X)).unop,
uniq' := λ s m w, has_hom.hom.op_inj (t.hom_ext _ _) }
/-- A terminal object is initial in the opposite category. -/
def initial_op_of_terminal {X : C} (t : is_terminal X) : is_initial (opposite.op X) :=
{ desc := λ s, (t.from s.X.unop).op,
uniq' := λ s m w, has_hom.hom.unop_inj (t.hom_ext _ _) }
/-- A terminal object in the opposite category is initial in the original category. -/
def initial_unop_of_terminal {X : Cᵒᵖ} (t : is_terminal X) : is_initial X.unop :=
{ desc := λ s, (t.from (opposite.op s.X)).unop,
uniq' := λ s m w, has_hom.hom.op_inj (t.hom_ext _ _) }
/-- From a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, given an initial object of `J`, construct a cone for `J`.
In `limit_of_diagram_initial` we show it is a limit cone. -/
@[simps]
def cone_of_diagram_initial {J : Type v} [small_category J]
{X : J} (tX : is_initial X) (F : J ⥤ C) : cone F :=
{ X := F.obj X,
π :=
{ app := λ j, F.map (tX.to j),
naturality' := λ j j' k,
begin
dsimp,
rw [← F.map_comp, category.id_comp, tX.hom_ext (tX.to j ≫ k) (tX.to j')],
end } }
/-- From a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, given an initial object of `J`, show the cone
`cone_of_diagram_initial` is a limit. -/
def limit_of_diagram_initial {J : Type v} [small_category J]
{X : J} (tX : is_initial X) (F : J ⥤ C) :
is_limit (cone_of_diagram_initial tX F) :=
{ lift := λ s, s.π.app X,
uniq' := λ s m w,
begin
rw [← w X, cone_of_diagram_initial_π_app, tX.hom_ext (tX.to X) (𝟙 _)],
dsimp, simp -- See note [dsimp, simp]
end}
-- This is reducible to allow usage of lemmas about `cone_point_unique_up_to_iso`.
/-- For a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, if `J` has an initial object then the image of it is isomorphic
to the limit of `F`. -/
@[reducible]
def limit_of_initial {J : Type v} [small_category J] (F : J ⥤ C)
[has_initial J] [has_limit F] :
limit F ≅ F.obj (⊥_ J) :=
is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso
(limit.is_limit _)
(limit_of_diagram_initial initial_is_initial F)
/-- From a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, given a terminal object of `J`, construct a cocone for `J`.
In `colimit_of_diagram_terminal` we show it is a colimit cocone. -/
@[simps]
def cocone_of_diagram_terminal {J : Type v} [small_category J]
{X : J} (tX : is_terminal X) (F : J ⥤ C) : cocone F :=
{ X := F.obj X,
ι :=
{ app := λ j, F.map (tX.from j),
naturality' := λ j j' k,
begin
dsimp,
rw [← F.map_comp, category.comp_id, tX.hom_ext (k ≫ tX.from j') (tX.from j)],
end } }
/-- From a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, given a terminal object of `J`, show the cocone
`cocone_of_diagram_terminal` is a colimit. -/
def colimit_of_diagram_terminal {J : Type v} [small_category J]
{X : J} (tX : is_terminal X) (F : J ⥤ C) :
is_colimit (cocone_of_diagram_terminal tX F) :=
{ desc := λ s, s.ι.app X,
uniq' := λ s m w,
by { rw [← w X, cocone_of_diagram_terminal_ι_app, tX.hom_ext (tX.from X) (𝟙 _)], simp } }
-- This is reducible to allow usage of lemmas about `cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso`.
/-- For a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, if `J` has a terminal object then the image of it is isomorphic
to the colimit of `F`. -/
@[reducible]
def colimit_of_terminal {J : Type v} [small_category J] (F : J ⥤ C)
[has_terminal J] [has_colimit F] :
colimit F ≅ F.obj (⊤_ J) :=
is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso
(colimit.is_colimit _)
(colimit_of_diagram_terminal terminal_is_terminal F)
end
end category_theory.limits
|
2c467ead8b551751d4ceef3f04b944e2100af7d7 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/algebra/gcd_monoid/multiset.lean | 4fc37e61de7b198622038a43ed0405e4382d520a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,478 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import algebra.gcd_monoid.basic
import data.multiset.lattice
/-!
# GCD and LCM operations on multisets
## Main definitions
- `multiset.gcd` - the greatest common denominator of a `multiset` of elements of a `gcd_monoid`
- `multiset.lcm` - the least common multiple of a `multiset` of elements of a `gcd_monoid`
## Implementation notes
TODO: simplify with a tactic and `data.multiset.lattice`
## Tags
multiset, gcd
-/
namespace multiset
variables {α : Type*} [cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero α] [normalized_gcd_monoid α]
/-! ### lcm -/
section lcm
/-- Least common multiple of a multiset -/
def lcm (s : multiset α) : α := s.fold gcd_monoid.lcm 1
@[simp] lemma lcm_zero : (0 : multiset α).lcm = 1 :=
fold_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma lcm_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(a ::ₘ s).lcm = gcd_monoid.lcm a s.lcm :=
fold_cons_left _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma lcm_singleton {a : α} : ({a} : multiset α).lcm = normalize a :=
(fold_singleton _ _ _).trans $ lcm_one_right _
@[simp] lemma lcm_add (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) : (s₁ + s₂).lcm = gcd_monoid.lcm s₁.lcm s₂.lcm :=
eq.trans (by simp [lcm]) (fold_add _ _ _ _ _)
lemma lcm_dvd {s : multiset α} {a : α} : s.lcm ∣ a ↔ (∀ b ∈ s, b ∣ a) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, lcm_dvd_iff] {contextual := tt})
lemma dvd_lcm {s : multiset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∣ s.lcm :=
lcm_dvd.1 dvd_rfl _ h
lemma lcm_mono {s₁ s₂ : multiset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.lcm ∣ s₂.lcm :=
lcm_dvd.2 $ assume b hb, dvd_lcm (h hb)
@[simp] lemma normalize_lcm (s : multiset α) : normalize (s.lcm) = s.lcm :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) $ λ a s IH, by simp
@[simp] theorem lcm_eq_zero_iff [nontrivial α] (s : multiset α) : s.lcm = 0 ↔ (0 : α) ∈ s :=
begin
induction s using multiset.induction_on with a s ihs,
{ simp only [lcm_zero, one_ne_zero, not_mem_zero] },
{ simp only [mem_cons, lcm_cons, lcm_eq_zero_iff, ihs, @eq_comm _ a] },
end
variables [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] lemma lcm_erase_dup (s : multiset α) : (erase_dup s).lcm = s.lcm :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) $ λ a s IH, begin
by_cases a ∈ s; simp [IH, h],
unfold lcm,
rw [← cons_erase h, fold_cons_left, ← lcm_assoc, lcm_same],
apply lcm_eq_of_associated_left (associated_normalize _),
end
@[simp] lemma lcm_ndunion (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(ndunion s₁ s₂).lcm = gcd_monoid.lcm s₁.lcm s₂.lcm :=
by { rw [← lcm_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, lcm_erase_dup, lcm_add], simp }
@[simp] lemma lcm_union (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).lcm = gcd_monoid.lcm s₁.lcm s₂.lcm :=
by { rw [← lcm_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, lcm_erase_dup, lcm_add], simp }
@[simp] lemma lcm_ndinsert (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(ndinsert a s).lcm = gcd_monoid.lcm a s.lcm :=
by { rw [← lcm_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, lcm_erase_dup, lcm_cons], simp }
end lcm
/-! ### gcd -/
section gcd
/-- Greatest common divisor of a multiset -/
def gcd (s : multiset α) : α := s.fold gcd_monoid.gcd 0
@[simp] lemma gcd_zero : (0 : multiset α).gcd = 0 :=
fold_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma gcd_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(a ::ₘ s).gcd = gcd_monoid.gcd a s.gcd :=
fold_cons_left _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma gcd_singleton {a : α} : ({a} : multiset α).gcd = normalize a :=
(fold_singleton _ _ _).trans $ gcd_zero_right _
@[simp] lemma gcd_add (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) : (s₁ + s₂).gcd = gcd_monoid.gcd s₁.gcd s₂.gcd :=
eq.trans (by simp [gcd]) (fold_add _ _ _ _ _)
lemma dvd_gcd {s : multiset α} {a : α} : a ∣ s.gcd ↔ (∀ b ∈ s, a ∣ b) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, dvd_gcd_iff] {contextual := tt})
lemma gcd_dvd {s : multiset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.gcd ∣ a :=
dvd_gcd.1 dvd_rfl _ h
lemma gcd_mono {s₁ s₂ : multiset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂.gcd ∣ s₁.gcd :=
dvd_gcd.2 $ assume b hb, gcd_dvd (h hb)
@[simp] lemma normalize_gcd (s : multiset α) : normalize (s.gcd) = s.gcd :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) $ λ a s IH, by simp
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff (s : multiset α) : s.gcd = 0 ↔ ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s → x = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intros h x hx,
apply eq_zero_of_zero_dvd,
rw ← h,
apply gcd_dvd hx },
{ apply s.induction_on,
{ simp },
intros a s sgcd h,
simp [h a (mem_cons_self a s), sgcd (λ x hx, h x (mem_cons_of_mem hx))] }
end
variables [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] lemma gcd_erase_dup (s : multiset α) : (erase_dup s).gcd = s.gcd :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) $ λ a s IH, begin
by_cases a ∈ s; simp [IH, h],
unfold gcd,
rw [← cons_erase h, fold_cons_left, ← gcd_assoc, gcd_same],
apply (associated_normalize _).gcd_eq_left,
end
@[simp] lemma gcd_ndunion (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(ndunion s₁ s₂).gcd = gcd_monoid.gcd s₁.gcd s₂.gcd :=
by { rw [← gcd_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, gcd_erase_dup, gcd_add], simp }
@[simp] lemma gcd_union (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).gcd = gcd_monoid.gcd s₁.gcd s₂.gcd :=
by { rw [← gcd_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, gcd_erase_dup, gcd_add], simp }
@[simp] lemma gcd_ndinsert (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(ndinsert a s).gcd = gcd_monoid.gcd a s.gcd :=
by { rw [← gcd_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, gcd_erase_dup, gcd_cons], simp }
end gcd
end multiset
|
e0dae595c21c234fdf1045c7db36185334924e72 | 5c47d5f6f51310e594c57486e051666894b008a1 | /CategoryTheory.lean | 86a10e0066e2f1be386a5deed1c5cfafa1893dd0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | adrianmartir/category-theory-lean4 | 100ed364c07441b30d1483949152c39060563ccf | fa786c12114b7fad3f6c9e831d8ef2120a46bd05 | refs/heads/main | 1,687,620,544,571 | 1,626,958,787,000 | 1,626,958,787,000 | 372,252,151 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 60 | lean | import CategoryTheory.Category
import CategoryTheory.Limits
|
194afd7cdb1726197bbad9da42c2740b77e36208 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /test/calc.lean | 7220fa8fb49c7be639d0cfbe5085c9cb03a5dd7c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,065 | lean | import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotic_equivalent
import measure_theory.integral.interval_integral
import measure_theory.measure.vector_measure
variables {α β γ δ : Type*}
section is_equivalent
open_locale asymptotics
example {l : filter α} {u v w : α → β} [normed_add_comm_group β]
(huv : u ~[l] v) (hvw : v ~[l] w) : u ~[l] w :=
calc u ~[l] v : huv
... ~[l] w : hvw
end is_equivalent
section interval_integral
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {μ : measure_theory.measure ℝ}
local notation u ` ~[`:50 a:50`-`:40 b `] `:0 v:50 := interval_integrable a b u v
example {a b c : ℝ} (hab : a ~[f-μ] b)
(hbc : b ~[f-μ] c) : interval_integrable f μ a c :=
calc a ~[f-μ] b : hab
... ~[f-μ] c : hbc
end interval_integral
section vector_measure
open measure_theory measure_theory.vector_measure
open_locale measure_theory
example {u : vector_measure ℝ ℝ} {v : vector_measure ℝ ℝ} {w : vector_measure ℝ ℝ}
(huv : u ≪ᵥ v) (hvw : v ≪ᵥ w) : u ≪ᵥ w :=
calc u ≪ᵥ v : huv
... ≪ᵥ w : hvw
end vector_measure
|
242fa928f04353135862e8ed0c1fb2af1fa6ca97 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/data/seq/computation.lean | 26c258d75c8154c9e6c4650b572a7a73a81bd5e3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 37,940 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
-/
import data.stream.init
import tactic.basic
open function
universes u v w
/-
coinductive computation (α : Type u) : Type u
| return : α → computation α
| think : computation α → computation α
-/
/-- `computation α` is the type of unbounded computations returning `α`.
An element of `computation α` is an infinite sequence of `option α` such
that if `f n = some a` for some `n` then it is constantly `some a` after that. -/
def computation (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : stream (option α) // ∀ {n a}, f n = some a → f (n+1) = some a }
namespace computation
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- constructors
/-- `return a` is the computation that immediately terminates with result `a`. -/
def return (a : α) : computation α := ⟨stream.const (some a), λn a', id⟩
instance : has_coe_t α (computation α) := ⟨return⟩ -- note [use has_coe_t]
/-- `think c` is the computation that delays for one "tick" and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def think (c : computation α) : computation α :=
⟨none :: c.1, λn a h, by {cases n with n, contradiction, exact c.2 h}⟩
/-- `thinkN c n` is the computation that delays for `n` ticks and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def thinkN (c : computation α) : ℕ → computation α
| 0 := c
| (n+1) := think (thinkN n)
-- check for immediate result
/-- `head c` is the first step of computation, either `some a` if `c = return a`
or `none` if `c = think c'`. -/
def head (c : computation α) : option α := c.1.head
-- one step of computation
/-- `tail c` is the remainder of computation, either `c` if `c = return a`
or `c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def tail (c : computation α) : computation α :=
⟨c.1.tail, λ n a, let t := c.2 in t⟩
/-- `empty α` is the computation that never returns, an infinite sequence of
`think`s. -/
def empty (α) : computation α := ⟨stream.const none, λn a', id⟩
instance : inhabited (computation α) := ⟨empty _⟩
/-- `run_for c n` evaluates `c` for `n` steps and returns the result, or `none`
if it did not terminate after `n` steps. -/
def run_for : computation α → ℕ → option α := subtype.val
/-- `destruct c` is the destructor for `computation α` as a coinductive type.
It returns `inl a` if `c = return a` and `inr c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def destruct (c : computation α) : α ⊕ computation α :=
match c.1 0 with
| none := sum.inr (tail c)
| some a := sum.inl a
end
/-- `run c` is an unsound meta function that runs `c` to completion, possibly
resulting in an infinite loop in the VM. -/
meta def run : computation α → α | c :=
match destruct c with
| sum.inl a := a
| sum.inr ca := run ca
end
theorem destruct_eq_ret {s : computation α} {a : α} :
destruct s = sum.inl a → s = return a :=
begin
dsimp [destruct],
induction f0 : s.1 0; intro h,
{ contradiction },
{ apply subtype.eq, funext n,
induction n with n IH,
{ injection h with h', rwa h' at f0 },
{ exact s.2 IH } }
end
theorem destruct_eq_think {s : computation α} {s'} :
destruct s = sum.inr s' → s = think s' :=
begin
dsimp [destruct],
induction f0 : s.1 0 with a'; intro h,
{ injection h with h', rw ←h',
cases s with f al,
apply subtype.eq, dsimp [think, tail],
rw ←f0, exact (stream.eta f).symm },
{ contradiction }
end
@[simp] theorem destruct_ret (a : α) : destruct (return a) = sum.inl a := rfl
@[simp] theorem destruct_think : ∀ s : computation α, destruct (think s) = sum.inr s
| ⟨f, al⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem destruct_empty : destruct (empty α) = sum.inr (empty α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_ret (a : α) : head (return a) = some a := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_think (s : computation α) : head (think s) = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_empty : head (empty α) = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_ret (a : α) : tail (return a) = return a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_think (s : computation α) : tail (think s) = s :=
by cases s with f al; apply subtype.eq; dsimp [tail, think]; rw [stream.tail_cons]
@[simp] theorem tail_empty : tail (empty α) = empty α := rfl
theorem think_empty : empty α = think (empty α) :=
destruct_eq_think destruct_empty
def cases_on {C : computation α → Sort v} (s : computation α)
(h1 : ∀ a, C (return a)) (h2 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s := begin
induction H : destruct s with v v,
{ rw destruct_eq_ret H, apply h1 },
{ cases v with a s', rw destruct_eq_think H, apply h2 }
end
def corec.F (f : β → α ⊕ β) : α ⊕ β → option α × (α ⊕ β)
| (sum.inl a) := (some a, sum.inl a)
| (sum.inr b) := (match f b with
| sum.inl a := some a
| sum.inr b' := none
end, f b)
/-- `corec f b` is the corecursor for `computation α` as a coinductive type.
If `f b = inl a` then `corec f b = return a`, and if `f b = inl b'` then
`corec f b = think (corec f b')`. -/
def corec (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : computation α :=
begin
refine ⟨stream.corec' (corec.F f) (sum.inr b), λn a' h, _⟩,
rw stream.corec'_eq,
change stream.corec' (corec.F f) (corec.F f (sum.inr b)).2 n = some a',
revert h, generalize : sum.inr b = o, revert o,
induction n with n IH; intro o,
{ change (corec.F f o).1 = some a' → (corec.F f (corec.F f o).2).1 = some a',
cases o with a b; intro h, { exact h },
dsimp [corec.F] at h, dsimp [corec.F],
cases f b with a b', { exact h },
{ contradiction } },
{ rw [stream.corec'_eq (corec.F f) (corec.F f o).2,
stream.corec'_eq (corec.F f) o],
exact IH (corec.F f o).2 }
end
/-- left map of `⊕` -/
def lmap (f : α → β) : α ⊕ γ → β ⊕ γ
| (sum.inl a) := sum.inl (f a)
| (sum.inr b) := sum.inr b
/-- right map of `⊕` -/
def rmap (f : β → γ) : α ⊕ β → α ⊕ γ
| (sum.inl a) := sum.inl a
| (sum.inr b) := sum.inr (f b)
attribute [simp] lmap rmap
@[simp] lemma corec_eq (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) :
destruct (corec f b) = rmap (corec f) (f b) :=
begin
dsimp [corec, destruct],
change stream.corec' (corec.F f) (sum.inr b) 0 with corec.F._match_1 (f b),
induction h : f b with a b', { refl },
dsimp [corec.F, destruct],
apply congr_arg, apply subtype.eq,
dsimp [corec, tail],
rw [stream.corec'_eq, stream.tail_cons],
dsimp [corec.F], rw h
end
section bisim
variable (R : computation α → computation α → Prop)
local infix ` ~ `:50 := R
def bisim_o : α ⊕ computation α → α ⊕ computation α → Prop
| (sum.inl a) (sum.inl a') := a = a'
| (sum.inr s) (sum.inr s') := R s s'
| _ _ := false
attribute [simp] bisim_o
def is_bisimulation := ∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → bisim_o R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
-- If two computations are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : is_bisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
begin
apply subtype.eq,
apply stream.eq_of_bisim (λx y, ∃ s s' : computation α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'),
dsimp [stream.is_bisimulation],
intros t₁ t₂ e,
exact match t₁, t₂, e with ._, ._, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ :=
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s'), from
and.imp id (λr, ⟨tail s, tail s',
by cases s; refl, by cases s'; refl, r⟩) this,
begin
have := bisim r, revert r this,
apply cases_on s _ _; intros; apply cases_on s' _ _; intros; intros r this,
{ constructor, dsimp at this, rw this, assumption },
{ rw [destruct_ret, destruct_think] at this,
exact false.elim this },
{ rw [destruct_ret, destruct_think] at this,
exact false.elim this },
{ simp at this, simp [*] }
end
end,
exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
end
end bisim
-- It's more of a stretch to use ∈ for this relation, but it
-- asserts that the computation limits to the given value.
protected def mem (a : α) (s : computation α) := some a ∈ s.1
instance : has_mem α (computation α) := ⟨computation.mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : computation α) {a m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
s.1 m = some a → s.1 n = some a :=
by {cases s with f al, induction h with n h IH, exacts [id, λ h2, al (IH h2)]}
theorem mem_unique {s : computation α} {a b : α} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b
| ⟨m, ha⟩ ⟨n, hb⟩ := by injection
(le_stable s (le_max_left m n) ha.symm).symm.trans
(le_stable s (le_max_right m n) hb.symm)
theorem mem.left_unique : relator.left_unique ((∈) : α → computation α → Prop) :=
λ a s b, mem_unique
/-- `terminates s` asserts that the computation `s` eventually terminates with some value. -/
class terminates (s : computation α) : Prop := (term : ∃ a, a ∈ s)
theorem terminates_iff (s : computation α) : terminates s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
⟨λ h, h.1, terminates.mk⟩
theorem terminates_of_mem {s : computation α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : terminates s :=
⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
theorem terminates_def (s : computation α) : terminates s ↔ ∃ n, (s.1 n).is_some :=
⟨λ ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩, ⟨n, by {dsimp [stream.nth] at h, rw ←h, exact rfl}⟩,
λ ⟨n, h⟩, ⟨⟨option.get h, n, (option.eq_some_of_is_some h).symm⟩⟩⟩
theorem ret_mem (a : α) : a ∈ return a :=
exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem eq_of_ret_mem {a a' : α} (h : a' ∈ return a) : a' = a :=
mem_unique h (ret_mem _)
instance ret_terminates (a : α) : terminates (return a) :=
terminates_of_mem (ret_mem _)
theorem think_mem {s : computation α} {a} : a ∈ s → a ∈ think s
| ⟨n, h⟩ := ⟨n+1, h⟩
instance think_terminates (s : computation α) :
∀ [terminates s], terminates (think s)
| ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ := ⟨⟨a, n+1, h⟩⟩
theorem of_think_mem {s : computation α} {a} : a ∈ think s → a ∈ s
| ⟨n, h⟩ := by {cases n with n', contradiction, exact ⟨n', h⟩}
theorem of_think_terminates {s : computation α} :
terminates (think s) → terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ := ⟨⟨a, of_think_mem h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ empty α :=
λ ⟨n, h⟩, by clear _fun_match; contradiction
theorem not_terminates_empty : ¬ terminates (empty α) :=
λ ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, not_mem_empty a h
theorem eq_empty_of_not_terminates {s} (H : ¬ terminates s) : s = empty α :=
begin
apply subtype.eq, funext n,
induction h : s.val n, {refl},
refine absurd _ H, exact ⟨⟨_, _, h.symm⟩⟩
end
theorem thinkN_mem {s : computation α} {a} : ∀ n, a ∈ thinkN s n ↔ a ∈ s
| 0 := iff.rfl
| (n+1) := iff.trans ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ (thinkN_mem n)
instance thinkN_terminates (s : computation α) :
∀ [terminates s] n, terminates (thinkN s n)
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ n := ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem n).2 h⟩⟩
theorem of_thinkN_terminates (s : computation α) (n) :
terminates (thinkN s n) → terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ := ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem _).1 h⟩⟩
/-- `promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
def promises (s : computation α) (a : α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a'⦄, a' ∈ s → a = a'
infix ` ~> `:50 := promises
theorem mem_promises {s : computation α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → s ~> a :=
λ h a', mem_unique h
theorem empty_promises (a : α) : empty α ~> a :=
λ a' h, absurd h (not_mem_empty _)
section get
variables (s : computation α) [h : terminates s]
include s h
/-- `length s` gets the number of steps of a terminating computation -/
def length : ℕ := nat.find ((terminates_def _).1 h)
/-- `get s` returns the result of a terminating computation -/
def get : α := option.get (nat.find_spec $ (terminates_def _).1 h)
theorem get_mem : get s ∈ s :=
exists.intro (length s) (option.eq_some_of_is_some _).symm
theorem get_eq_of_mem {a} : a ∈ s → get s = a :=
mem_unique (get_mem _)
theorem mem_of_get_eq {a} : get s = a → a ∈ s :=
by intro h; rw ←h; apply get_mem
@[simp] theorem get_think : get (think s) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ $ let ⟨n, h⟩ := get_mem s in ⟨n+1, h⟩
@[simp] theorem get_thinkN (n) : get (thinkN s n) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ $ (thinkN_mem _).2 (get_mem _)
theorem get_promises : s ~> get s := λ a, get_eq_of_mem _
theorem mem_of_promises {a} (p : s ~> a) : a ∈ s :=
by { casesI h, cases h with a' h, rw p h, exact h }
theorem get_eq_of_promises {a} : s ~> a → get s = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ∘ mem_of_promises _
end get
/-- `results s a n` completely characterizes a terminating computation:
it asserts that `s` terminates after exactly `n` steps, with result `a`. -/
def results (s : computation α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :=
∃ (h : a ∈ s), @length _ s (terminates_of_mem h) = n
theorem results_of_terminates (s : computation α) [T : terminates s] :
results s (get s) (length s) :=
⟨get_mem _, rfl⟩
theorem results_of_terminates' (s : computation α) [T : terminates s] {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
results s a (length s) :=
by rw ←get_eq_of_mem _ h; apply results_of_terminates
theorem results.mem {s : computation α} {a n} : results s a n → a ∈ s
| ⟨m, _⟩ := m
theorem results.terminates {s : computation α} {a n} (h : results s a n) : terminates s :=
terminates_of_mem h.mem
theorem results.length {s : computation α} {a n} [T : terminates s] :
results s a n → length s = n
| ⟨_, h⟩ := h
theorem results.val_unique {s : computation α} {a b m n}
(h1 : results s a m) (h2 : results s b n) : a = b :=
mem_unique h1.mem h2.mem
theorem results.len_unique {s : computation α} {a b m n}
(h1 : results s a m) (h2 : results s b n) : m = n :=
by haveI := h1.terminates; haveI := h2.terminates; rw [←h1.length, h2.length]
theorem exists_results_of_mem {s : computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, results s a n :=
by haveI := terminates_of_mem h; exact ⟨_, results_of_terminates' s h⟩
@[simp] theorem get_ret (a : α) : get (return a) = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ⟨0, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem length_ret (a : α) : length (return a) = 0 :=
let h := computation.ret_terminates a in
nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero $ nat.find_min' ((terminates_def (return a)).1 h) rfl
theorem results_ret (a : α) : results (return a) a 0 :=
⟨_, length_ret _⟩
@[simp] theorem length_think (s : computation α) [h : terminates s] :
length (think s) = length s + 1 :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ exact nat.find_min' _ (nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 h)) },
{ have : (option.is_some ((think s).val (length (think s))) : Prop) :=
nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 s.think_terminates),
cases length (think s) with n,
{ contradiction },
{ apply nat.succ_le_succ, apply nat.find_min', apply this } }
end
theorem results_think {s : computation α} {a n}
(h : results s a n) : results (think s) a (n + 1) :=
by haveI := h.terminates; exact ⟨think_mem h.mem, by rw [length_think, h.length]⟩
theorem of_results_think {s : computation α} {a n}
(h : results (think s) a n) : ∃ m, results s a m ∧ n = m + 1 :=
begin
haveI := of_think_terminates h.terminates,
have := results_of_terminates' _ (of_think_mem h.mem),
exact ⟨_, this, results.len_unique h (results_think this)⟩,
end
@[simp] theorem results_think_iff {s : computation α} {a n} :
results (think s) a (n + 1) ↔ results s a n :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨n', r, e⟩ := of_results_think h in by injection e with h'; rwa h',
results_think⟩
theorem results_thinkN {s : computation α} {a m} :
∀ n, results s a m → results (thinkN s n) a (m + n)
| 0 h := h
| (n+1) h := results_think (results_thinkN n h)
theorem results_thinkN_ret (a : α) (n) : results (thinkN (return a) n) a n :=
by have := results_thinkN n (results_ret a); rwa nat.zero_add at this
@[simp] theorem length_thinkN (s : computation α) [h : terminates s] (n) :
length (thinkN s n) = length s + n :=
(results_thinkN n (results_of_terminates _)).length
theorem eq_thinkN {s : computation α} {a n} (h : results s a n) :
s = thinkN (return a) n :=
begin
revert s,
induction n with n IH; intro s;
apply cases_on s (λ a', _) (λ s, _); intro h,
{ rw ←eq_of_ret_mem h.mem, refl },
{ cases of_results_think h with n h, cases h, contradiction },
{ have := h.len_unique (results_ret _), contradiction },
{ rw IH (results_think_iff.1 h), refl }
end
theorem eq_thinkN' (s : computation α) [h : terminates s] :
s = thinkN (return (get s)) (length s) :=
eq_thinkN (results_of_terminates _)
def mem_rec_on {C : computation α → Sort v} {a s} (M : a ∈ s)
(h1 : C (return a)) (h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
begin
haveI T := terminates_of_mem M,
rw [eq_thinkN' s, get_eq_of_mem s M],
generalize : length s = n,
induction n with n IH, exacts [h1, h2 _ IH]
end
def terminates_rec_on {C : computation α → Sort v} (s) [terminates s]
(h1 : ∀ a, C (return a)) (h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
mem_rec_on (get_mem s) (h1 _) h2
/-- Map a function on the result of a computation. -/
def map (f : α → β) : computation α → computation β
| ⟨s, al⟩ := ⟨s.map (λo, option.cases_on o none (some ∘ f)),
λn b, begin
dsimp [stream.map, stream.nth],
induction e : s n with a; intro h,
{ contradiction }, { rw [al e, ←h] }
end⟩
def bind.G : β ⊕ computation β → β ⊕ computation α ⊕ computation β
| (sum.inl b) := sum.inl b
| (sum.inr cb') := sum.inr $ sum.inr cb'
def bind.F (f : α → computation β) :
computation α ⊕ computation β → β ⊕ computation α ⊕ computation β
| (sum.inl ca) :=
match destruct ca with
| sum.inl a := bind.G $ destruct (f a)
| sum.inr ca' := sum.inr $ sum.inl ca'
end
| (sum.inr cb) := bind.G $ destruct cb
/-- Compose two computations into a monadic `bind` operation. -/
def bind (c : computation α) (f : α → computation β) : computation β :=
corec (bind.F f) (sum.inl c)
instance : has_bind computation := ⟨@bind⟩
theorem has_bind_eq_bind {β} (c : computation α) (f : α → computation β) :
c >>= f = bind c f := rfl
/-- Flatten a computation of computations into a single computation. -/
def join (c : computation (computation α)) : computation α := c >>= id
@[simp] theorem map_ret (f : α → β) (a) : map f (return a) = return (f a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_think (f : α → β) : ∀ s, map f (think s) = think (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ := by apply subtype.eq; dsimp [think, map]; rw stream.map_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_map (f : α → β) (s) : destruct (map f s) = lmap f (rmap (map f) (destruct s)) :=
by apply s.cases_on; intro; simp
@[simp] theorem map_id : ∀ (s : computation α), map id s = s
| ⟨f, al⟩ := begin
apply subtype.eq; simp [map, function.comp],
have e : (@option.rec α (λ_, option α) none some) = id,
{ ext ⟨⟩; refl },
simp [e, stream.map_id]
end
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) :
∀ (s : computation α), map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ := begin
apply subtype.eq; dsimp [map],
rw stream.map_map,
apply congr_arg (λ f : _ → option γ, stream.map f s),
ext ⟨⟩; refl
end
@[simp] theorem ret_bind (a) (f : α → computation β) :
bind (return a) f = f a :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λc₁ c₂,
c₁ = bind (return a) f ∧ c₂ = f a ∨
c₁ = corec (bind.F f) (sum.inr c₂)),
{ intros c₁ c₂ h,
exact match c₁, c₂, h with
| ._, ._, or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
simp [bind, bind.F],
cases destruct (f a) with b cb; simp [bind.G]
end
| ._, c, or.inr rfl := begin
simp [bind.F],
cases destruct c with b cb; simp [bind.G]
end end },
{ simp }
end
@[simp] theorem think_bind (c) (f : α → computation β) :
bind (think c) f = think (bind c f) :=
destruct_eq_think $ by simp [bind, bind.F]
@[simp] theorem bind_ret (f : α → β) (s) : bind s (return ∘ f) = map f s :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λc₁ c₂, c₁ = c₂ ∨
∃ s, c₁ = bind s (return ∘ f) ∧ c₂ = map f s),
{ intros c₁ c₂ h,
exact match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, _, or.inl (eq.refl c) := begin cases destruct c with b cb; simp end
| _, _, or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
apply cases_on s; intros s; simp,
exact or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
end end },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end
@[simp] theorem bind_ret' (s : computation α) : bind s return = s :=
by rw bind_ret; change (λ x : α, x) with @id α; rw map_id
@[simp] theorem bind_assoc (s : computation α) (f : α → computation β) (g : β → computation γ) :
bind (bind s f) g = bind s (λ (x : α), bind (f x) g) :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λc₁ c₂, c₁ = c₂ ∨
∃ s, c₁ = bind (bind s f) g ∧ c₂ = bind s (λ (x : α), bind (f x) g)),
{ intros c₁ c₂ h,
exact match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, _, or.inl (eq.refl c) := by cases destruct c with b cb; simp
| ._, ._, or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
apply cases_on s; intros s; simp,
{ generalize : f s = fs,
apply cases_on fs; intros t; simp,
{ cases destruct (g t) with b cb; simp } },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end end },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem results_bind {s : computation α} {f : α → computation β} {a b m n}
(h1 : results s a m) (h2 : results (f a) b n) : results (bind s f) b (n + m) :=
begin
have := h1.mem, revert m,
apply mem_rec_on this _ (λ s IH, _); intros m h1,
{ rw [ret_bind], rw h1.len_unique (results_ret _), exact h2 },
{ rw [think_bind], cases of_results_think h1 with m' h, cases h with h1 e,
rw e, exact results_think (IH h1) }
end
theorem mem_bind {s : computation α} {f : α → computation β} {a b}
(h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : b ∈ f a) : b ∈ bind s f :=
let ⟨m, h1⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h1,
⟨n, h2⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h2 in (results_bind h1 h2).mem
instance terminates_bind (s : computation α) (f : α → computation β)
[terminates s] [terminates (f (get s))] :
terminates (bind s f) :=
terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp] theorem get_bind (s : computation α) (f : α → computation β)
[terminates s] [terminates (f (get s))] :
get (bind s f) = get (f (get s)) :=
get_eq_of_mem _ (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp] theorem length_bind (s : computation α) (f : α → computation β)
[T1 : terminates s] [T2 : terminates (f (get s))] :
length (bind s f) = length (f (get s)) + length s :=
(results_of_terminates _).len_unique $
results_bind (results_of_terminates _) (results_of_terminates _)
theorem of_results_bind {s : computation α} {f : α → computation β} {b k} :
results (bind s f) b k →
∃ a m n, results s a m ∧ results (f a) b n ∧ k = n + m :=
begin
induction k with n IH generalizing s;
apply cases_on s (λ a, _) (λ s', _); intro e,
{ simp [thinkN] at e, refine ⟨a, _, _, results_ret _, e, rfl⟩ },
{ have := congr_arg head (eq_thinkN e), contradiction },
{ simp at e, refine ⟨a, _, n+1, results_ret _, e, rfl⟩ },
{ simp at e, exact let ⟨a, m, n', h1, h2, e'⟩ := IH e in
by rw e'; exact ⟨a, m.succ, n', results_think h1, h2, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {s : computation α} {f : α → computation β} {b}
(h : b ∈ bind s f) : ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
let ⟨k, h⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h,
⟨a, m, n, h1, h2, e⟩ := of_results_bind h in ⟨a, h1.mem, h2.mem⟩
theorem bind_promises {s : computation α} {f : α → computation β} {a b}
(h1 : s ~> a) (h2 : f a ~> b) : bind s f ~> b :=
λ b' bB, begin
rcases exists_of_mem_bind bB with ⟨a', a's, ba'⟩,
rw ←h1 a's at ba', exact h2 ba'
end
instance : monad computation :=
{ map := @map,
pure := @return,
bind := @bind }
instance : is_lawful_monad computation :=
{ id_map := @map_id,
bind_pure_comp_eq_map := @bind_ret,
pure_bind := @ret_bind,
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc }
theorem has_map_eq_map {β} (f : α → β) (c : computation α) : f <$> c = map f c := rfl
@[simp] theorem return_def (a) : (_root_.return a : computation α) = return a := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_ret' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (a), f <$> return a = return (f a) := map_ret
@[simp] theorem map_think' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) s, f <$> think s = think (f <$> s) := map_think
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {a} {s : computation α} (m : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s :=
by rw ←bind_ret; apply mem_bind m; apply ret_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : computation α} (h : b ∈ map f s) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
by rw ←bind_ret at h; exact
let ⟨a, as, fb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h in ⟨a, as, mem_unique (ret_mem _) fb⟩
instance terminates_map (f : α → β) (s : computation α) [terminates s] : terminates (map f s) :=
by rw ←bind_ret; apply_instance
theorem terminates_map_iff (f : α → β) (s : computation α) :
terminates (map f s) ↔ terminates s :=
⟨λ ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, let ⟨b, h1, _⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h in ⟨⟨_, h1⟩⟩,
@computation.terminates_map _ _ _ _⟩
-- Parallel computation
/-- `c₁ <|> c₂` calculates `c₁` and `c₂` simultaneously, returning
the first one that gives a result. -/
def orelse (c₁ c₂ : computation α) : computation α :=
@computation.corec α (computation α × computation α)
(λ⟨c₁, c₂⟩, match destruct c₁ with
| sum.inl a := sum.inl a
| sum.inr c₁' := match destruct c₂ with
| sum.inl a := sum.inl a
| sum.inr c₂' := sum.inr (c₁', c₂')
end
end) (c₁, c₂)
instance : alternative computation :=
{ orelse := @orelse, failure := @empty, ..computation.monad }
@[simp] theorem ret_orelse (a : α) (c₂ : computation α) :
(return a <|> c₂) = return a :=
destruct_eq_ret $ by unfold has_orelse.orelse; simp [orelse]
@[simp] theorem orelse_ret (c₁ : computation α) (a : α) :
(think c₁ <|> return a) = return a :=
destruct_eq_ret $ by unfold has_orelse.orelse; simp [orelse]
@[simp] theorem orelse_think (c₁ c₂ : computation α) :
(think c₁ <|> think c₂) = think (c₁ <|> c₂) :=
destruct_eq_think $ by unfold has_orelse.orelse; simp [orelse]
@[simp] theorem empty_orelse (c) : (empty α <|> c) = c :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λc₁ c₂, (empty α <|> c₂) = c₁) _ rfl,
intros s' s h, rw ←h,
apply cases_on s; intros s; rw think_empty; simp,
rw ←think_empty,
end
@[simp] theorem orelse_empty (c : computation α) : (c <|> empty α) = c :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λc₁ c₂, (c₂ <|> empty α) = c₁) _ rfl,
intros s' s h, rw ←h,
apply cases_on s; intros s; rw think_empty; simp,
rw←think_empty,
end
/-- `c₁ ~ c₂` asserts that `c₁` and `c₂` either both terminate with the same result,
or both loop forever. -/
def equiv (c₁ c₂ : computation α) : Prop := ∀ a, a ∈ c₁ ↔ a ∈ c₂
infix ` ~ `:50 := equiv
@[refl] theorem equiv.refl (s : computation α) : s ~ s := λ_, iff.rfl
@[symm] theorem equiv.symm {s t : computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ s :=
λh a, (h a).symm
@[trans] theorem equiv.trans {s t u : computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ u → s ~ u :=
λh1 h2 a, (h1 a).trans (h2 a)
theorem equiv.equivalence : equivalence (@equiv α) :=
⟨@equiv.refl _, @equiv.symm _, @equiv.trans _⟩
theorem equiv_of_mem {s t : computation α} {a} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : a ∈ t) : s ~ t :=
λa', ⟨λma, by rw mem_unique ma h1; exact h2,
λma, by rw mem_unique ma h2; exact h1⟩
theorem terminates_congr {c₁ c₂ : computation α}
(h : c₁ ~ c₂) : terminates c₁ ↔ terminates c₂ :=
by simp only [terminates_iff, exists_congr h]
theorem promises_congr {c₁ c₂ : computation α}
(h : c₁ ~ c₂) (a) : c₁ ~> a ↔ c₂ ~> a :=
forall_congr (λa', imp_congr (h a') iff.rfl)
theorem get_equiv {c₁ c₂ : computation α} (h : c₁ ~ c₂)
[terminates c₁] [terminates c₂] : get c₁ = get c₂ :=
get_eq_of_mem _ $ (h _).2 $ get_mem _
theorem think_equiv (s : computation α) : think s ~ s :=
λ a, ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩
theorem thinkN_equiv (s : computation α) (n) : thinkN s n ~ s :=
λ a, thinkN_mem n
theorem bind_congr {s1 s2 : computation α} {f1 f2 : α → computation β}
(h1 : s1 ~ s2) (h2 : ∀ a, f1 a ~ f2 a) : bind s1 f1 ~ bind s2 f2 :=
λ b, ⟨λh, let ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h in
mem_bind ((h1 a).1 ha) ((h2 a b).1 hb),
λh, let ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h in
mem_bind ((h1 a).2 ha) ((h2 a b).2 hb)⟩
theorem equiv_ret_of_mem {s : computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : s ~ return a :=
equiv_of_mem h (ret_mem _)
/-- `lift_rel R ca cb` is a generalization of `equiv` to relations other than
equality. It asserts that if `ca` terminates with `a`, then `cb` terminates with
some `b` such that `R a b`, and if `cb` terminates with `b` then `ca` terminates
with some `a` such that `R a b`. -/
def lift_rel (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : computation α) (cb : computation β) : Prop :=
(∀ {a}, a ∈ ca → ∃ {b}, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b) ∧
∀ {b}, b ∈ cb → ∃ {a}, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b
theorem lift_rel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : computation α) (cb : computation β) :
lift_rel (swap R) cb ca ↔ lift_rel R ca cb :=
and_comm _ _
theorem lift_eq_iff_equiv (c₁ c₂ : computation α) : lift_rel (=) c₁ c₂ ↔ c₁ ~ c₂ :=
⟨λ⟨h1, h2⟩ a,
⟨λ a1, let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := h1 a1 in by rwa ab,
λ a2, let ⟨b, b1, ab⟩ := h2 a2 in by rwa ←ab⟩,
λe, ⟨λ a a1, ⟨a, (e _).1 a1, rfl⟩, λ a a2, ⟨a, (e _).2 a2, rfl⟩⟩⟩
theorem lift_rel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : reflexive R) : reflexive (lift_rel R) :=
λ s, ⟨λ a as, ⟨a, as, H a⟩, λ b bs, ⟨b, bs, H b⟩⟩
theorem lift_rel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : symmetric R) : symmetric (lift_rel R) :=
λ s1 s2 ⟨l, r⟩,
⟨λ a a2, let ⟨b, b1, ab⟩ := r a2 in ⟨b, b1, H ab⟩,
λ a a1, let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := l a1 in ⟨b, b2, H ab⟩⟩
theorem lift_rel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : transitive R) : transitive (lift_rel R) :=
λ s1 s2 s3 ⟨l1, r1⟩ ⟨l2, r2⟩,
⟨λ a a1, let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := l1 a1, ⟨c, c3, bc⟩ := l2 b2 in ⟨c, c3, H ab bc⟩,
λ c c3, let ⟨b, b2, bc⟩ := r2 c3, ⟨a, a1, ab⟩ := r1 b2 in ⟨a, a1, H ab bc⟩⟩
theorem lift_rel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : equivalence R → equivalence (lift_rel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ :=
⟨lift_rel.refl R refl, lift_rel.symm R symm, lift_rel.trans R trans⟩
theorem lift_rel.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} (H : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S a b) (s t) :
lift_rel R s t → lift_rel S s t | ⟨l, r⟩ :=
⟨λ a as, let ⟨b, bt, ab⟩ := l as in ⟨b, bt, H ab⟩,
λ b bt, let ⟨a, as, ab⟩ := r bt in ⟨a, as, H ab⟩⟩
theorem terminates_of_lift_rel {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} :
lift_rel R s t → (terminates s ↔ terminates t) | ⟨l, r⟩ :=
⟨λ ⟨⟨a, as⟩⟩, let ⟨b, bt, ab⟩ := l as in ⟨⟨b, bt⟩⟩,
λ ⟨⟨b, bt⟩⟩, let ⟨a, as, ab⟩ := r bt in ⟨⟨a, as⟩⟩⟩
theorem rel_of_lift_rel {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} :
lift_rel R ca cb → ∀ {a b}, a ∈ ca → b ∈ cb → R a b
| ⟨l, r⟩ a b ma mb :=
let ⟨b', mb', ab'⟩ := l ma in by rw mem_unique mb mb'; exact ab'
theorem lift_rel_of_mem {R : α → β → Prop} {a b ca cb}
(ma : a ∈ ca) (mb : b ∈ cb) (ab : R a b) : lift_rel R ca cb :=
⟨λ a' ma', by rw mem_unique ma' ma; exact ⟨b, mb, ab⟩,
λ b' mb', by rw mem_unique mb' mb; exact ⟨a, ma, ab⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_lift_rel_left {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb}
(H : lift_rel R ca cb) {a} (h : a ∈ ca) : ∃ {b}, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
H.left h
theorem exists_of_lift_rel_right {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb}
(H : lift_rel R ca cb) {b} (h : b ∈ cb) : ∃ {a}, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b :=
H.right h
theorem lift_rel_def {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} : lift_rel R ca cb ↔
(terminates ca ↔ terminates cb) ∧ ∀ {a b}, a ∈ ca → b ∈ cb → R a b :=
⟨λh, ⟨terminates_of_lift_rel h, λ a b ma mb,
let ⟨b', mb', ab⟩ := h.left ma in by rwa mem_unique mb mb'⟩,
λ⟨l, r⟩,
⟨λ a ma, let ⟨⟨b, mb⟩⟩ := l.1 ⟨⟨_, ma⟩⟩ in ⟨b, mb, r ma mb⟩,
λ b mb, let ⟨⟨a, ma⟩⟩ := l.2 ⟨⟨_, mb⟩⟩ in ⟨a, ma, r ma mb⟩⟩⟩
theorem lift_rel_bind {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop)
{s1 : computation α} {s2 : computation β}
{f1 : α → computation γ} {f2 : β → computation δ}
(h1 : lift_rel R s1 s2) (h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → lift_rel S (f1 a) (f2 b))
: lift_rel S (bind s1 f1) (bind s2 f2) :=
let ⟨l1, r1⟩ := h1 in
⟨λ c cB,
let ⟨a, a1, c₁⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind cB,
⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := l1 a1,
⟨l2, r2⟩ := h2 ab,
⟨d, d2, cd⟩ := l2 c₁ in
⟨_, mem_bind b2 d2, cd⟩,
λ d dB,
let ⟨b, b1, d1⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind dB,
⟨a, a2, ab⟩ := r1 b1,
⟨l2, r2⟩ := h2 ab,
⟨c, c₂, cd⟩ := r2 d1 in
⟨_, mem_bind a2 c₂, cd⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_rel_return_left (R : α → β → Prop) (a : α) (cb : computation β) :
lift_rel R (return a) cb ↔ ∃ {b}, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
⟨λ⟨l, r⟩, l (ret_mem _),
λ⟨b, mb, ab⟩,
⟨λ a' ma', by rw eq_of_ret_mem ma'; exact ⟨b, mb, ab⟩,
λ b' mb', ⟨_, ret_mem _, by rw mem_unique mb' mb; exact ab⟩⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_rel_return_right (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : computation α) (b : β) :
lift_rel R ca (return b) ↔ ∃ {a}, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b :=
by rw [lift_rel.swap, lift_rel_return_left]
@[simp] theorem lift_rel_return (R : α → β → Prop) (a : α) (b : β) :
lift_rel R (return a) (return b) ↔ R a b :=
by rw [lift_rel_return_left]; exact
⟨λ⟨b', mb', ab'⟩, by rwa eq_of_ret_mem mb' at ab',
λab, ⟨_, ret_mem _, ab⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_rel_think_left (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : computation α) (cb : computation β) :
lift_rel R (think ca) cb ↔ lift_rel R ca cb :=
and_congr (forall_congr $ λb, imp_congr ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ iff.rfl)
(forall_congr $ λb, imp_congr iff.rfl $
exists_congr $ λ b, and_congr ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ iff.rfl)
@[simp] theorem lift_rel_think_right (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : computation α) (cb : computation β) :
lift_rel R ca (think cb) ↔ lift_rel R ca cb :=
by rw [←lift_rel.swap R, ←lift_rel.swap R]; apply lift_rel_think_left
theorem lift_rel_mem_cases {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb}
(Ha : ∀ a ∈ ca, lift_rel R ca cb)
(Hb : ∀ b ∈ cb, lift_rel R ca cb) : lift_rel R ca cb :=
⟨λ a ma, (Ha _ ma).left ma, λ b mb, (Hb _ mb).right mb⟩
theorem lift_rel_congr {R : α → β → Prop} {ca ca' : computation α} {cb cb' : computation β}
(ha : ca ~ ca') (hb : cb ~ cb') : lift_rel R ca cb ↔ lift_rel R ca' cb' :=
and_congr
(forall_congr $ λ a, imp_congr (ha _) $ exists_congr $ λ b, and_congr (hb _) iff.rfl)
(forall_congr $ λ b, imp_congr (hb _) $ exists_congr $ λ a, and_congr (ha _) iff.rfl)
theorem lift_rel_map {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop)
{s1 : computation α} {s2 : computation β}
{f1 : α → γ} {f2 : β → δ}
(h1 : lift_rel R s1 s2) (h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S (f1 a) (f2 b))
: lift_rel S (map f1 s1) (map f2 s2) :=
by rw [←bind_ret, ←bind_ret]; apply lift_rel_bind _ _ h1; simp; exact @h2
theorem map_congr (R : α → α → Prop) (S : β → β → Prop)
{s1 s2 : computation α} {f : α → β}
(h1 : s1 ~ s2) : map f s1 ~ map f s2 :=
by rw [←lift_eq_iff_equiv];
exact lift_rel_map eq _ ((lift_eq_iff_equiv _ _).2 h1) (λ a b, congr_arg _)
def lift_rel_aux (R : α → β → Prop)
(C : computation α → computation β → Prop) :
α ⊕ computation α → β ⊕ computation β → Prop
| (sum.inl a) (sum.inl b) := R a b
| (sum.inl a) (sum.inr cb) := ∃ {b}, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b
| (sum.inr ca) (sum.inl b) := ∃ {a}, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b
| (sum.inr ca) (sum.inr cb) := C ca cb
attribute [simp] lift_rel_aux
@[simp] lemma lift_rel_aux.ret_left (R : α → β → Prop)
(C : computation α → computation β → Prop) (a cb) :
lift_rel_aux R C (sum.inl a) (destruct cb) ↔ ∃ {b}, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
begin
apply cb.cases_on (λ b, _) (λ cb, _),
{ exact ⟨λ h, ⟨_, ret_mem _, h⟩, λ ⟨b', mb, h⟩,
by rw [mem_unique (ret_mem _) mb]; exact h⟩ },
{ rw [destruct_think],
exact ⟨λ ⟨b, h, r⟩, ⟨b, think_mem h, r⟩,
λ ⟨b, h, r⟩, ⟨b, of_think_mem h, r⟩⟩ }
end
theorem lift_rel_aux.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) (a b) :
lift_rel_aux (swap R) (swap C) b a = lift_rel_aux R C a b :=
by cases a with a ca; cases b with b cb; simp only [lift_rel_aux]
@[simp] lemma lift_rel_aux.ret_right (R : α → β → Prop)
(C : computation α → computation β → Prop) (b ca) :
lift_rel_aux R C (destruct ca) (sum.inl b) ↔ ∃ {a}, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b :=
by rw [←lift_rel_aux.swap, lift_rel_aux.ret_left]
theorem lift_rel_rec.lem {R : α → β → Prop} (C : computation α → computation β → Prop)
(H : ∀ {ca cb}, C ca cb → lift_rel_aux R C (destruct ca) (destruct cb))
(ca cb) (Hc : C ca cb) (a) (ha : a ∈ ca) : lift_rel R ca cb :=
begin
revert cb, refine mem_rec_on ha _ (λ ca' IH, _);
intros cb Hc; have h := H Hc,
{ simp at h, simp [h] },
{ have h := H Hc, simp, revert h, apply cb.cases_on (λ b, _) (λ cb', _);
intro h; simp at h; simp [h], exact IH _ h }
end
theorem lift_rel_rec {R : α → β → Prop} (C : computation α → computation β → Prop)
(H : ∀ {ca cb}, C ca cb → lift_rel_aux R C (destruct ca) (destruct cb))
(ca cb) (Hc : C ca cb) : lift_rel R ca cb :=
lift_rel_mem_cases (lift_rel_rec.lem C @H ca cb Hc) (λ b hb,
(lift_rel.swap _ _ _).2 $
lift_rel_rec.lem (swap C)
(λ cb ca h, cast (lift_rel_aux.swap _ _ _ _).symm $ H h)
cb ca Hc b hb)
end computation
|
d24b2ab73ce5d123a1f9271674e9b3a3694500d5 | 88fb7558b0636ec6b181f2a548ac11ad3919f8a5 | /tests/lean/run/dunfold2.lean | b921301fef40bdb187f2669c333e3d46e21f61e9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | moritayasuaki/lean | 9f666c323cb6fa1f31ac597d777914aed41e3b7a | ae96ebf6ee953088c235ff7ae0e8c95066ba8001 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,135,440,814 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 90,269,903 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,493,906,291,000 | 1,493,906,291,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,509 | lean | open tactic
set_option pp.all true
def g : nat → nat := λ x, x + 5
example (a b : nat) (p : nat → Prop) (h : p (g (nat.succ (nat.succ a)))) : p (g (a + 2)) :=
by do
t ← target,
new_t ← dsimplify (λ e, failed)
(λ e,
do { new_e ← unfold_projection e, return (new_e, tt) }
<|>
do {
guard ([`add, `nat.add, `one, `zero]^.any e^.is_app_of),
/- We are using transparency.none, so
nat.add a (bit0 (nat.succ nat.zero))
cannot be matched with
nat.add ?a (nat.succ ?b)
-/
new_e ← dunfold_expr_core transparency.none e, trace e,
trace "===>", trace new_e, trace "-------",
return (new_e, tt) })
t,
trace new_t,
expected ← to_expr `(p (g (nat.add a (bit0 (nat.succ nat.zero))))),
guard (new_t = expected),
trace new_t,
assumption
example (a b : nat) (p : nat → Prop) (h : p (g (nat.succ (nat.succ a)))) : p (g (a + nat.succ (nat.succ 0))) :=
by do
t ← target,
new_t ← dsimplify (λ e, failed)
(λ e,
do { new_e ← unfold_projection e, return (new_e, tt) }
<|>
do {
guard ([`add, `nat.add, `one, `zero]^.any e^.is_app_of),
new_e ← dunfold_expr_core transparency.none e, trace e,
trace "===>", trace new_e, trace "-------",
return (new_e, tt) })
t,
trace new_t,
expected ← to_expr `(p (g (nat.succ (nat.succ a)))),
guard (new_t = expected),
trace new_t,
assumption
|
9ad68b70157625194e845cfb1bd4bbb5bd336107 | 4950bf76e5ae40ba9f8491647d0b6f228ddce173 | /src/analysis/special_functions/pow.lean | 8b3efbabb103f6039e43808168f45132a331fffa | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ntzwq/mathlib | ca50b21079b0a7c6781c34b62199a396dd00cee2 | 36eec1a98f22df82eaccd354a758ef8576af2a7f | refs/heads/master | 1,675,193,391,478 | 1,607,822,996,000 | 1,607,822,996,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 61,171 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne
-/
import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric
import analysis.calculus.extend_deriv
/-!
# Power function on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ennreal`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` and `y` are complex numbers,
* or `x` and `y` are real numbers,
* or `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* or `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ennreal`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical real topological_space nnreal
namespace complex
/-- The complex power function `x^y`, given by `x^y = exp(y log x)` (where `log` is the principal
determination of the logarithm), unless `x = 0` where one sets `0^0 = 1` and `0^y = 0` for
`y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def cpow (x y : ℂ) : ℂ :=
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y)
noncomputable instance : has_pow ℂ ℂ := ⟨cpow⟩
@[simp] lemma cpow_eq_pow (x y : ℂ) : cpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
lemma cpow_def (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y =
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y) := rfl
@[simp] lemma cpow_zero (x : ℂ) : x ^ (0 : ℂ) = 1 := by simp [cpow_def]
@[simp] lemma cpow_eq_zero_iff (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 :=
by { simp only [cpow_def], split_ifs; simp [*, exp_ne_zero] }
@[simp] lemma zero_cpow {x : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = 0 :=
by simp [cpow_def, *]
@[simp] lemma cpow_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (1 : ℂ) = x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp [hx, cpow_def]
else by rw [cpow_def, if_neg (one_ne_zero : (1 : ℂ) ≠ 0), if_neg hx, mul_one, exp_log hx]
@[simp] lemma one_cpow (x : ℂ) : (1 : ℂ) ^ x = 1 :=
by rw cpow_def; split_ifs; simp [one_ne_zero, *] at *
lemma cpow_add {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
by simp [cpow_def]; split_ifs; simp [*, exp_add, mul_add] at *
lemma cpow_mul {x y : ℂ} (z : ℂ) (h₁ : -π < (log x * y).im) (h₂ : (log x * y).im ≤ π) :
x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
begin
simp [cpow_def],
split_ifs;
simp [*, exp_ne_zero, log_exp h₁ h₂, mul_assoc] at *
end
lemma cpow_neg (x y : ℂ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
by simp [cpow_def]; split_ifs; simp [exp_neg]
lemma cpow_neg_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (-1 : ℂ) = x⁻¹ :=
by simpa using cpow_neg x 1
@[simp] lemma cpow_nat_cast (x : ℂ) : ∀ (n : ℕ), x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := if hx : x = 0 then by simp only [hx, pow_succ,
complex.zero_cpow (nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (nat.succ_ne_zero _)), zero_mul]
else by simp [cpow_add, hx, pow_add, cpow_nat_cast n]
@[simp] lemma cpow_int_cast (x : ℂ) : ∀ (n : ℤ), x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n
| (n : ℕ) := by simp; refl
| -[1+ n] := by rw fpow_neg_succ_of_nat;
simp only [int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe, int.cast_neg, complex.cpow_neg, inv_eq_one_div,
int.cast_coe_nat, cpow_nat_cast]
lemma cpow_nat_inv_pow (x : ℂ) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) ^ n = x :=
have (log x * (↑n)⁻¹).im = (log x).im / n,
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← of_real_nat_cast, ← of_real_inv, mul_im,
of_real_re, of_real_im]; simp,
have h : -π < (log x * (↑n)⁻¹).im ∧ (log x * (↑n)⁻¹).im ≤ π,
from (le_total (log x).im 0).elim
(λ h, ⟨calc -π < (log x).im : by simp [log, neg_pi_lt_arg]
... ≤ ((log x).im * 1) / n : (le_div_iff (nat.cast_pos.2 hn : (0 : ℝ) < _)).mpr
(mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left (by rw ← nat.cast_one; exact nat.cast_le.2 hn) h)
... = (log x * (↑n)⁻¹).im : by simp [this],
this.symm ▸ le_trans (div_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg h n.cast_nonneg)
(le_of_lt real.pi_pos)⟩)
(λ h, ⟨this.symm ▸ lt_of_lt_of_le (neg_neg_of_pos real.pi_pos)
(div_nonneg h n.cast_nonneg),
calc (log x * (↑n)⁻¹).im = (1 * (log x).im) / n : by simp [this]
... ≤ (log x).im : (div_le_iff' (nat.cast_pos.2 hn : (0 : ℝ) < _)).mpr
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (by rw ← nat.cast_one; exact nat.cast_le.2 hn) h)
... ≤ _ : by simp [log, arg_le_pi]⟩),
by rw [← cpow_nat_cast, ← cpow_mul _ h.1 h.2,
inv_mul_cancel (show (n : ℂ) ≠ 0, from nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn)),
cpow_one]
end complex
namespace real
/-- The real power function `x^y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp(y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0^0=1` and `0^y=0` for `y ≠ 0`.
For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (πy)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) := ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
noncomputable instance : has_pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
lemma rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
lemma rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y =
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y) :=
by simp only [rpow_def, complex.cpow_def];
split_ifs;
simp [*, (complex.of_real_log hx).symm, -complex.of_real_mul,
(complex.of_real_mul _ _).symm, complex.exp_of_real_re] at *
lemma rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
lemma exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = (exp x) ^ y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 :=
by { simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx], split_ifs; simp [*, exp_ne_zero] }
open_locale real
lemma rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) :=
begin
rw [rpow_def, complex.cpow_def, if_neg],
have : complex.log x * y = ↑(log(-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * complex.I,
simp only [complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, complex.arg_of_real_of_neg hx,
complex.abs_of_real, complex.of_real_mul], ring,
{ rw [this, complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← complex.of_real_exp, ← complex.of_real_cos,
← complex.of_real_sin, mul_add, ← complex.of_real_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← complex.of_real_mul,
complex.add_re, complex.of_real_re, complex.mul_re, complex.I_re, complex.of_real_im,
real.log_neg_eq_log],
ring },
{ rw complex.of_real_eq_zero, exact ne_of_lt hx }
end
lemma rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y =
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) :=
by split_ifs; simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
lemma rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y :=
by rw rpow_def_of_pos hx; apply exp_pos
@[simp] lemma rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 :=
by simp [rpow_def, *]
@[simp] lemma rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
@[simp] lemma one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
lemma zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 :=
by { by_cases h : x = 0; simp [h, zero_le_one] }
lemma zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x :=
by { by_cases h : x = 0; simp [h, zero_le_one] }
lemma rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx];
split_ifs; simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
lemma abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ y) ≤ abs (x) ^ y :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 x with (hx|rfl|hx),
{ rw [abs_of_pos hx, abs_of_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _)] },
{ rw [abs_zero, abs_of_nonneg (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg le_rfl _)] },
{ rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log,
abs_mul, abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)],
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _) }
end
end real
namespace complex
lemma of_real_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) :=
by simp [real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs; simp [complex.of_real_log hx]
@[simp] lemma abs_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ (y : ℂ)) = x.abs ^ y :=
begin
rw [real.rpow_def_of_nonneg (abs_nonneg _), complex.cpow_def],
split_ifs;
simp [*, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (real.exp_pos _)), complex.log, complex.exp_add,
add_mul, mul_right_comm _ I, exp_mul_I, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I,
(complex.of_real_mul _ _).symm, -complex.of_real_mul] at *
end
@[simp] lemma abs_cpow_inv_nat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : abs (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) = x.abs ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) :=
by rw ← abs_cpow_real; simp [-abs_cpow_real]
end complex
namespace real
variables {x y z : ℝ}
lemma rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
by simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
lemma rpow_add' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with H|pos,
{ simp only [← H, h, rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, true_and, zero_rpow, eq_self_iff_true, ne.def,
not_false_iff, zero_eq_mul],
by_contradiction F,
push_neg at F,
apply h,
simp [F] },
{ exact rpow_add pos _ _ }
end
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
lemma le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with H|pos,
{ by_cases h : y + z = 0,
{ simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero],
calc (0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
... = 1 : by simp },
{ simp [rpow_add', ← H, h] } },
{ simp [rpow_add pos] }
end
lemma rpow_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
by rw [← complex.of_real_inj, complex.of_real_cpow (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg hx _),
complex.of_real_cpow hx, complex.of_real_mul, complex.cpow_mul, complex.of_real_cpow hx];
simp only [(complex.of_real_mul _ _).symm, (complex.of_real_log hx).symm,
complex.of_real_im, neg_lt_zero, pi_pos, le_of_lt pi_pos]
lemma rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
by simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs; simp [*, exp_neg] at *
lemma rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
lemma rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) :
x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
by { simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢, simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv] }
@[simp] lemma rpow_nat_cast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
by simp only [rpow_def, (complex.of_real_pow _ _).symm, complex.cpow_nat_cast,
complex.of_real_nat_cast, complex.of_real_re]
@[simp] lemma rpow_int_cast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
by simp only [rpow_def, (complex.of_real_fpow _ _).symm, complex.cpow_int_cast,
complex.of_real_int_cast, complex.of_real_re]
lemma rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ :=
begin
suffices H : x ^ ((-1 : ℤ) : ℝ) = x⁻¹, by exact_mod_cast H,
simp only [rpow_int_cast, fpow_one, fpow_neg],
end
lemma mul_rpow {x y z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ y) : (x*y)^z = x^z * y^z :=
begin
iterate 3 { rw real.rpow_def_of_nonneg }, split_ifs; simp * at *,
{ have hx : 0 < x, cases lt_or_eq_of_le h with h₂ h₂, exact h₂, exfalso, apply h_2, exact eq.symm h₂,
have hy : 0 < y, cases lt_or_eq_of_le h₁ with h₂ h₂, exact h₂, exfalso, apply h_3, exact eq.symm h₂,
rw [log_mul (ne_of_gt hx) (ne_of_gt hy), add_mul, exp_add]},
{ exact h₁},
{ exact h},
{ exact mul_nonneg h h₁},
end
lemma inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : (x⁻¹)^y = (x^y)⁻¹ :=
begin
by_cases hy0 : y = 0, { simp [*] },
by_cases hx0 : x = 0, { simp [*] },
simp only [real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, real.rpow_def_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 hx), if_false,
hx0, mt inv_eq_zero.1 hx0, log_inv, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, exp_neg]
end
lemma div_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x^z / y^z :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow hx (inv_nonneg.2 hy), inv_rpow hy]
lemma log_rpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : log (x^y) = y * (log x) :=
begin
apply exp_injective,
rw [exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx y), ← exp_log hx, mul_comm, rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos (log x)) y],
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < y^z :=
begin
rw le_iff_eq_or_lt at hx, cases hx,
{ rw [← hx, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hz)], exact rpow_pos_of_pos (by rwa ← hx at hxy) _ },
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans hx hxy), exp_lt_exp],
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (log_lt_log hx hxy) hz
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow {x y z: ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ y^z :=
begin
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with rfl|h₁', { refl },
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₂ with rfl|h₂', { simp },
exact le_of_lt (rpow_lt_rpow h h₁' h₂')
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le $ λ h, rpow_le_rpow hy h (le_of_lt hz), λ h, rpow_lt_rpow hx h hz⟩
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 $ rpow_lt_rpow_iff hy hx hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x^y < x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]},
rw exp_lt_exp, exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hyz (log_pos hx),
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)]},
rw exp_le_exp, exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hyz (log_nonneg hx),
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x^y < x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]},
rw exp_lt_exp, exact mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left hyz (log_neg hx0 hx1),
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]},
rw exp_le_exp, exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left hyz (log_nonpos (le_of_lt hx0) hx1),
end
lemma rpow_lt_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < 1 :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_lt_rpow hx1 hx2 hz }
lemma rpow_le_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_le_rpow hx1 hx2 hz }
lemma rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z < 1 :=
by { convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
by { convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma one_lt_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x^z :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_lt_rpow zero_le_one hx hz }
lemma one_le_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_le_rpow zero_le_one hx hz }
lemma one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : z < 0) :
1 < x^z :=
by { convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx1 hx2 hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : z ≤ 0) :
1 ≤ x^z :=
by { convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx1 hx2 hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : x ^ y < 1 ↔ 1 < x ∧ y < 0 ∨ x < 1 ∧ 0 < y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, exp_lt_one_iff, mul_neg_iff, log_pos_iff hx, log_neg_iff hx]
lemma rpow_lt_one_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y < 1 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∨ 1 < x ∧ y < 0 ∨ x < 1 ∧ 0 < y :=
begin
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl|hx),
{ rcases em (y = 0) with (rfl|hy); simp [*, lt_irrefl, zero_lt_one] },
{ simp [rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos hx, hx.ne.symm] }
end
lemma one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : 1 < x ^ y ↔ 1 < x ∧ 0 < y ∨ x < 1 ∧ y < 0 :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, one_lt_exp_iff, mul_pos_iff, log_pos_iff hx, log_neg_iff hx]
lemma one_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 < x ^ y ↔ 1 < x ∧ 0 < y ∨ 0 < x ∧ x < 1 ∧ y < 0 :=
begin
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl|hx),
{ rcases em (y = 0) with (rfl|hy); simp [*, lt_irrefl, (@zero_lt_one ℝ _ _).not_lt] },
{ simp [one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos hx, hx] }
end
lemma rpow_le_one_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : x ^ y ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ x ∧ y ≤ 0 ∨ x ≤ 1 ∧ 0 ≤ y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, exp_le_one_iff, mul_nonpos_iff, log_nonneg_iff hx, log_nonpos_iff hx]
lemma pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x :=
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0, by simpa [nat.pos_iff_ne_zero] using hn,
by rw [← rpow_nat_cast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x :=
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0, by simpa [nat.pos_iff_ne_zero] using hn,
by rw [← rpow_nat_cast, ← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
section prove_rpow_is_continuous
lemma continuous_rpow_aux1 : continuous (λp : {p:ℝ×ℝ // 0 < p.1}, p.val.1 ^ p.val.2) :=
suffices h : continuous (λ p : {p:ℝ×ℝ // 0 < p.1 }, exp (log p.val.1 * p.val.2)),
by { convert h, ext p, rw rpow_def_of_pos p.2 },
continuous_exp.comp $
(show continuous ((λp:{p:ℝ//0 < p}, log (p.val)) ∘ (λp:{p:ℝ×ℝ//0<p.fst}, ⟨p.val.1, p.2⟩)), from
continuous_log'.comp $ continuous_subtype_mk _ $ continuous_fst.comp continuous_subtype_val).mul
(continuous_snd.comp $ continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_id)
lemma continuous_rpow_aux2 : continuous (λ p : {p:ℝ×ℝ // p.1 < 0}, p.val.1 ^ p.val.2) :=
suffices h : continuous (λp:{p:ℝ×ℝ // p.1 < 0}, exp (log (-p.val.1) * p.val.2) * cos (p.val.2 * π)),
by { convert h, ext p, rw [rpow_def_of_neg p.2, log_neg_eq_log] },
(continuous_exp.comp $
(show continuous $ (λp:{p:ℝ//0<p},
log (p.val))∘(λp:{p:ℝ×ℝ//p.1<0}, ⟨-p.val.1, neg_pos_of_neg p.2⟩),
from continuous_log'.comp $ continuous_subtype_mk _ $ continuous_neg.comp $
continuous_fst.comp continuous_subtype_val).mul
(continuous_snd.comp $ continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_id)).mul
(continuous_cos.comp $
(continuous_snd.comp $ continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_id).mul continuous_const)
lemma continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
begin
cases lt_trichotomy 0 x,
exact continuous_within_at.continuous_at
(continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 continuous_rpow_aux1 _ h)
(mem_nhds_sets (by { convert (is_open_lt' (0:ℝ)).prod is_open_univ, ext, finish }) h),
cases h,
{ exact absurd h.symm hx },
exact continuous_within_at.continuous_at
(continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 continuous_rpow_aux2 _ h)
(mem_nhds_sets (by { convert (is_open_gt' (0:ℝ)).prod is_open_univ, ext, finish }) h)
end
lemma continuous_rpow_aux3 : continuous (λ p : {p:ℝ×ℝ // 0 < p.2}, p.val.1 ^ p.val.2) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ ⟨(x₀, y₀), hy₀⟩,
begin
by_cases hx₀ : x₀ = 0,
{ simp only [continuous_at, hx₀, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hy₀), metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds],
assume ε ε0,
rcases exists_pos_rat_lt (half_pos hy₀) with ⟨q, q_pos, q_lt⟩,
let q := (q:ℝ), replace q_pos : 0 < q := rat.cast_pos.2 q_pos,
let δ := min (min q (ε ^ (1 / q))) (1/2),
have δ0 : 0 < δ := lt_min (lt_min q_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos ε0 _)) (by norm_num),
have : δ ≤ q := le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _),
have : δ ≤ ε ^ (1 / q) := le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_right _ _),
have : δ < 1 := lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) (by norm_num),
use δ, use δ0, rintros ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hy⟩,
simp only [subtype.dist_eq, real.dist_eq, prod.dist_eq, sub_zero, subtype.coe_mk],
assume h, rw max_lt_iff at h, cases h with xδ yy₀,
have qy : q < y, calc q < y₀ / 2 : q_lt
... = y₀ - y₀ / 2 : (sub_half _).symm
... ≤ y₀ - δ : by linarith
... < y : sub_lt_of_abs_sub_lt_left yy₀,
calc abs(x^y) ≤ abs(x)^y : abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow _ _
... < δ ^ y : rpow_lt_rpow (abs_nonneg _) xδ hy
... < δ ^ q : by { refine rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt _ _ _, repeat {linarith} }
... ≤ (ε ^ (1 / q)) ^ q : by { refine rpow_le_rpow _ _ _, repeat {linarith} }
... = ε : by { rw [← rpow_mul, div_mul_cancel, rpow_one], exact ne_of_gt q_pos, linarith }},
{ exact (continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) _).1
(continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero hx₀ _).continuous_within_at }
end
lemma continuous_at_rpow_of_pos (hy : 0 < y) (x : ℝ) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
continuous_within_at.continuous_at
(continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 continuous_rpow_aux3 _ hy)
(mem_nhds_sets (by { convert is_open_univ.prod (is_open_lt' (0:ℝ)), ext, finish }) hy)
lemma continuous_at_rpow {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < y) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
by { cases h, exact continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero h _, exact continuous_at_rpow_of_pos h x }
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α] {f g : α → ℝ}
/--
`real.rpow` is continuous at all points except for the lower half of the y-axis.
In other words, the function `λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2` is continuous at `(x, y)` if `x ≠ 0` or `y > 0`.
Multiple forms of the claim is provided in the current section.
-/
lemma continuous_rpow (h : ∀a, f a ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < g a) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g):
continuous (λa:α, (f a) ^ (g a)) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ a,
begin
show continuous_at ((λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) ∘ (λa, (f a, g a))) a,
refine continuous_at.comp _ (continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 (hf.prod_mk hg) _),
{ replace h := h a, cases h,
{ exact continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero h _ },
{ exact continuous_at_rpow_of_pos h _ }},
end
lemma continuous_rpow_of_ne_zero (h : ∀a, f a ≠ 0) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g):
continuous (λa:α, (f a) ^ (g a)) := continuous_rpow (λa, or.inl $ h a) hf hg
lemma continuous_rpow_of_pos (h : ∀a, 0 < g a) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g):
continuous (λa:α, (f a) ^ (g a)) := continuous_rpow (λa, or.inr $ h a) hf hg
end prove_rpow_is_continuous
section prove_rpow_is_differentiable
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_of_pos {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) (p : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
have : has_deriv_at (λ x, exp (log x * p)) (p * x^(p-1)) x,
{ convert (has_deriv_at_exp _).comp x ((has_deriv_at_log (ne_of_gt h)).mul_const p) using 1,
field_simp [rpow_def_of_pos h, mul_sub, exp_sub, exp_log h, ne_of_gt h],
ring },
apply this.congr_of_eventually_eq,
have : set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) ∈ 𝓝 x := mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioi h,
exact filter.eventually_of_mem this (λ y hy, rpow_def_of_pos hy _)
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_of_neg {x : ℝ} (h : x < 0) (p : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
have : has_deriv_at (λ x, exp (log x * p) * cos (p * π)) (p * x^(p-1)) x,
{ convert ((has_deriv_at_exp _).comp x ((has_deriv_at_log (ne_of_lt h)).mul_const p)).mul_const _
using 1,
field_simp [rpow_def_of_neg h, mul_sub, exp_sub, sub_mul, cos_sub, exp_log_of_neg h, ne_of_lt h],
ring },
apply this.congr_of_eventually_eq,
have : set.Iio (0 : ℝ) ∈ 𝓝 x := mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio h,
exact filter.eventually_of_mem this (λ y hy, rpow_def_of_neg hy _)
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) (p : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with H|H|H,
{ exact has_deriv_at_rpow_of_neg H p },
{ exact (h H).elim },
{ exact has_deriv_at_rpow_of_pos H p },
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_zero_of_one_le {p : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * (0 : ℝ)^(p-1)) 0 :=
begin
apply has_deriv_at_of_has_deriv_at_of_ne (λ x hx, has_deriv_at_rpow hx p),
{ exact (continuous_rpow_of_pos (λ _, (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one h))
continuous_id continuous_const).continuous_at },
{ rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with rfl|h,
{ simp [continuous_const.continuous_at] },
{ exact (continuous_const.mul (continuous_rpow_of_pos (λ _, sub_pos_of_lt h)
continuous_id continuous_const)).continuous_at } }
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_of_one_le (x : ℝ) {p : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ rw hx, exact has_deriv_at_rpow_zero_of_one_le h },
{ exact has_deriv_at_rpow hx p }
end
end prove_rpow_is_differentiable
section sqrt
lemma sqrt_eq_rpow : sqrt = λx:ℝ, x ^ (1/(2:ℝ)) :=
begin
funext, by_cases h : 0 ≤ x,
{ rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg, mul_self_sqrt h, ← pow_two, ← rpow_nat_cast, ← rpow_mul h],
norm_num, exact sqrt_nonneg _, exact rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg h _ },
{ replace h : x < 0 := lt_of_not_ge h,
have : 1 / (2:ℝ) * π = π / (2:ℝ), ring,
rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (le_of_lt h), rpow_def_of_neg h, this, cos_pi_div_two, mul_zero] }
end
lemma continuous_sqrt : continuous sqrt :=
by rw sqrt_eq_rpow; exact continuous_rpow_of_pos (λa, by norm_num) continuous_id continuous_const
end sqrt
end real
section measurability_real
lemma real.measurable_rpow : measurable (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, p.1 ^ p.2) :=
begin
have h_meas : is_measurable {p : ℝ × ℝ | p.1 = 0} :=
(is_closed_singleton.preimage continuous_fst).is_measurable,
refine measurable_of_measurable_union_cover {p : ℝ × ℝ | p.1 = 0} {p : ℝ × ℝ | p.1 ≠ 0} h_meas
h_meas.compl _ _ _,
{ intro x, simp [em (x.fst = 0)], },
{ have h_eq_ite : (λ a : {p : ℝ × ℝ | p.fst = 0}, (a:ℝ×ℝ).fst ^ (a:ℝ×ℝ).snd) =
λ a : {p : ℝ × ℝ | p.fst = 0}, ite ((a:ℝ×ℝ).snd = 0) 1 0,
{ ext1 a,
have h_fst_zero : (a:ℝ×ℝ).fst = 0, from a.prop,
rw h_fst_zero,
split_ifs with h_snd,
{ rw h_snd,
exact real.rpow_zero _, },
exact real.zero_rpow h_snd, },
rw h_eq_ite,
change measurable ((λ x : ℝ, ite (x = 0) (1:ℝ) (0:ℝ))
∘ (λ a : {p : ℝ × ℝ | p.fst = 0}, (a:ℝ×ℝ).snd)),
refine measurable.comp _ (measurable_snd.comp measurable_subtype_coe),
exact measurable.ite (is_measurable_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const, },
{ refine continuous.measurable _,
rw continuous_iff_continuous_at,
intro x,
change continuous_at ((λ a : ℝ × ℝ, a.fst ^ a.snd)
∘ (λ a : {p : ℝ × ℝ | p.fst ≠ 0}, (a:ℝ×ℝ))) x,
refine continuous_at.comp _ continuous_at_subtype_coe,
change continuous_at (λ (p : ℝ × ℝ), p.fst ^ p.snd) x.val,
have h_x : x.val = (x.val.fst, x.val.snd), by simp,
rw h_x,
exact real.continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero x.prop _, },
end
lemma measurable.rpow {α} [measurable_space α] {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f)
(hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ (g a)) :=
begin
change measurable ((λ p : ℝ × ℝ, p.1 ^ p.2) ∘ (λ a : α, (f a, g a))),
exact real.measurable_rpow.comp (measurable.prod hf hg),
end
lemma real.measurable_rpow_const {y : ℝ} : measurable (λ x : ℝ, x ^ y) :=
begin
change measurable ((λ p : ℝ × ℝ, p.1 ^ p.2) ∘ (λ x : ℝ, (id x, (λ x, y) x))),
refine real.measurable_rpow.comp (measurable.prod measurable_id _),
change measurable (λ (a : ℝ), y),
exact measurable_const,
end
lemma measurable.rpow_const {α} [measurable_space α] {f : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f) {y : ℝ} :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ y) :=
hf.rpow measurable_const
end measurability_real
section differentiability
open real
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x f' : ℝ} {s : set ℝ} (p : ℝ)
/- Differentiability statements for the power of a function, when the function does not vanish
and the exponent is arbitrary-/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.rpow (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) s x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_at_rpow hx p).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf using 1,
ring
end
lemma has_deriv_at.rpow (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at *,
exact hf.rpow p hx
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.rpow (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow p hx).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.rpow (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow p hx).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.rpow (hf : differentiable_on ℝ f s) (hx : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s :=
λx h, (hf x h).rpow p (hx x h)
@[simp] lemma differentiable.rpow (hf : differentiable ℝ f) (hx : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) :=
λx, (hf x).rpow p (hx x)
lemma deriv_within_rpow (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, (f x)^p) s x = (deriv_within f s x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow p hx).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_rpow (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
deriv (λx, (f x)^p) x = (deriv f x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow p hx).deriv
/- Differentiability statements for the power of a function, when the function may vanish
but the exponent is at least one. -/
variable {p}
lemma has_deriv_within_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) s x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_at_rpow_of_one_le (f x) hp).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf using 1,
ring
end
lemma has_deriv_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at *,
exact hf.rpow_of_one_le hp
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_on ℝ f s) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s :=
λx h, (hf x h).rpow_of_one_le hp
@[simp] lemma differentiable.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable ℝ f) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) :=
λx, (hf x).rpow_of_one_le hp
lemma deriv_within_rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, (f x)^p) s x = (deriv_within f s x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
deriv (λx, (f x)^p) x = (deriv f x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).deriv
/- Differentiability statements for the square root of a function, when the function does not
vanish -/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.sqrt (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, sqrt (f y)) (f' / (2 * sqrt (f x))) s x :=
begin
simp only [sqrt_eq_rpow],
convert hf.rpow (1/2) hx,
rcases lt_trichotomy (f x) 0 with H|H|H,
{ have A : (f x)^((1:ℝ)/2) = 0,
{ rw rpow_def_of_neg H,
have : cos (1/2 * π) = 0, by { convert cos_pi_div_two using 2, ring },
rw [this],
simp },
have B : f x ^ ((1:ℝ) / 2 - 1) = 0,
{ rw rpow_def_of_neg H,
have : cos (π/2 - π) = 0, by simp [cos_sub],
have : cos (((1:ℝ)/2 - 1) * π) = 0, by { convert this using 2, ring },
rw this,
simp },
rw [A, B],
simp },
{ exact (hx H).elim },
{ have A : 0 < (f x)^((1:ℝ)/2) := rpow_pos_of_pos H _,
have B : (f x) ^ (-(1:ℝ)) = (f x)^(-((1:ℝ)/2)) * (f x)^(-((1:ℝ)/2)),
{ rw [← rpow_add H],
congr,
norm_num },
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add H, B, rpow_neg (le_of_lt H)],
field_simp [hx, ne_of_gt A],
ring }
end
lemma has_deriv_at.sqrt (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, sqrt (f y)) (f' / (2 * sqrt(f x))) x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at *,
exact hf.sqrt hx
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.sqrt (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λx, sqrt (f x)) s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.sqrt hx).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.sqrt (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, sqrt (f x)) x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.sqrt hx).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.sqrt (hf : differentiable_on ℝ f s) (hx : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, sqrt (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hf x h).sqrt (hx x h)
@[simp] lemma differentiable.sqrt (hf : differentiable ℝ f) (hx : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, sqrt (f x)) :=
λx, (hf x).sqrt (hx x)
lemma deriv_within_sqrt (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, sqrt (f x)) s x = (deriv_within f s x) / (2 * sqrt (f x)) :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.sqrt hx).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_sqrt (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
deriv (λx, sqrt (f x)) x = (deriv f x) / (2 * sqrt (f x)) :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.sqrt hx).deriv
end differentiability
section limits
open real filter
/-- The function `x ^ y` tends to `+∞` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_at_top {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : tendsto (λ x : ℝ, x ^ y) at_top at_top :=
begin
rw tendsto_at_top_at_top,
intro b,
use (max b 0) ^ (1/y),
intros x hx,
exact le_of_max_le_left
(by { convert rpow_le_rpow (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg (le_max_right b 0) (1/y)) hx (le_of_lt hy),
rw [← rpow_mul (le_max_right b 0), (eq_div_iff (ne_of_gt hy)).mp rfl, rpow_one] }),
end
/-- The function `x ^ (-y)` tends to `0` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_neg_at_top {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : tendsto (λ x : ℝ, x ^ (-y)) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto.congr' (eventually_eq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_at_top 0) (λ x hx, (rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx) y).symm))
(tendsto.inv_tendsto_at_top (tendsto_rpow_at_top hy))
/-- The function `x ^ (a / (b * x + c))` tends to `1` at `+∞`, for any real numbers `a`, `b`, and
`c` such that `b` is nonzero. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (a b c : ℝ) (hb : 0 ≠ b) :
tendsto (λ x, x ^ (a / (b*x+c))) at_top (𝓝 1) :=
begin
refine tendsto.congr' _ ((tendsto_exp_nhds_0_nhds_1.comp
(by simpa only [mul_zero, pow_one] using ((@tendsto_const_nhds _ _ _ a _).mul
(tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_at_top b c 1 hb (by norm_num))))).comp (tendsto_log_at_top)),
apply eventually_eq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_at_top (0:ℝ)),
intros x hx,
simp only [set.mem_Ioi, function.comp_app] at hx ⊢,
rw [exp_log hx, ← exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx (a / (b * x + c))), log_rpow hx (a / (b * x + c))],
field_simp,
end
/-- The function `x ^ (1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_div : tendsto (λ x, x ^ ((1:ℝ) / x)) at_top (𝓝 1) :=
by { convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (1:ℝ) _ (0:ℝ) zero_ne_one, ring }
/-- The function `x ^ (-1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_neg_div : tendsto (λ x, x ^ (-(1:ℝ) / x)) at_top (𝓝 1) :=
by { convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (-(1:ℝ)) _ (0:ℝ) zero_ne_one, ring }
end limits
namespace nnreal
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : has_pow ℝ≥0 ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y := rfl
@[simp] lemma rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_zero _
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 :=
begin
rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, coe_rpow, ← nnreal.coe_eq_zero],
exact real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
end
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
nnreal.eq $ real.zero_rpow h
@[simp] lemma rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_one _
@[simp] lemma one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
nnreal.eq $ real.one_rpow _
lemma rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_add (zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_neg x.2 _
lemma rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x ⁻¹ :=
by simp [rpow_neg]
lemma rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_sub (zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) y z
lemma rpow_sub' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) :
x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
lemma inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : (x⁻¹) ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
nnreal.eq $ real.inv_rpow x.2 y
lemma div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma rpow_nat_cast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
nnreal.eq $ by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using real.rpow_nat_cast x n
lemma mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x*y)^z = x^z * y^z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
lemma rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z: ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ y^z :=
real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
lemma rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z: ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x^z < y^z :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x^y < x^z :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x^y ≤ x^z :=
real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x^y < x^z :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x^y ≤ x^z :=
real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
lemma rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < 1 :=
real.rpow_lt_one hx hx1 hz
lemma rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
lemma rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z < 1 :=
real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
lemma rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
lemma one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x^z :=
real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
lemma one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
real.one_le_rpow h h₁
lemma one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x^z :=
real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz
lemma one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z ≤ 0) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 hz
lemma pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x :=
by { rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, coe_rpow, nnreal.coe_pow], exact real.pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv x.2 hn }
lemma rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x :=
by { rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, nnreal.coe_pow, coe_rpow], exact real.rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat x.2 hn }
lemma continuous_at_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < y) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ≥0×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
begin
have : (λp:ℝ≥0×ℝ, p.1^p.2) = nnreal.of_real ∘ (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) ∘ (λp:ℝ≥0 × ℝ, (p.1.1, p.2)),
{ ext p,
rw [coe_rpow, nnreal.coe_of_real _ (real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg p.1.2 _)],
refl },
rw this,
refine nnreal.continuous_of_real.continuous_at.comp (continuous_at.comp _ _),
{ apply real.continuous_at_rpow,
simp at h,
rw ← (nnreal.coe_eq_zero x) at h,
exact h },
{ exact ((continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk continuous_snd).continuous_at }
end
lemma of_real_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
nnreal.of_real (x ^ y) = (nnreal.of_real x) ^ y :=
begin
nth_rewrite 0 ← nnreal.coe_of_real x hx,
rw [←nnreal.coe_rpow, nnreal.of_real_coe],
end
end nnreal
section measurability_nnreal
lemma nnreal.measurable_rpow : measurable (λ p : nnreal × ℝ, p.1 ^ p.2) :=
begin
have h_rw : (λ p : nnreal × ℝ, p.1 ^ p.2) = (λ p : nnreal × ℝ, nnreal.of_real(↑(p.1) ^ p.2)),
{ ext1 a,
rw [←nnreal.coe_rpow, nnreal.of_real_coe], },
rw h_rw,
exact (measurable_fst.nnreal_coe.rpow measurable_snd).nnreal_of_real,
end
lemma measurable.nnreal_rpow {α} [measurable_space α] {f : α → nnreal} (hf : measurable f)
{g : α → ℝ} (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ (g a)) :=
begin
change measurable ((λ p : nnreal × ℝ, p.1 ^ p.2) ∘ (λ a : α, (f a, g a))),
exact nnreal.measurable_rpow.comp (measurable.prod hf hg),
end
lemma nnreal.measurable_rpow_const {y : ℝ} : measurable (λ a : nnreal, a ^ y) :=
begin
have h_rw : (λ a : nnreal, a ^ y) = (λ a : nnreal, nnreal.of_real(↑a ^ y)),
{ ext1 a,
rw [←nnreal.coe_rpow, nnreal.of_real_coe], },
rw h_rw,
exact nnreal.measurable_coe.rpow_const.nnreal_of_real,
end
lemma measurable.nnreal_rpow_const {α} [measurable_space α] {f : α → nnreal} (hf : measurable f)
{y : ℝ} :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ y) :=
hf.nnreal_rpow measurable_const
end measurability_nnreal
open filter
lemma filter.tendsto.nnrpow {α : Type*} {f : filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0} {v : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ}
(hx : tendsto u f (𝓝 x)) (hy : tendsto v f (𝓝 y)) (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < y) :
tendsto (λ a, (u a) ^ (v a)) f (𝓝 (x ^ y)) :=
tendsto.comp (nnreal.continuous_at_rpow h) (hx.prod_mk_nhds hy)
namespace nnreal
lemma continuous_at_rpow_const {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 ≤ y) :
continuous_at (λ z, z^y) x :=
h.elim (λ h, tendsto_id.nnrpow tendsto_const_nhds (or.inl h)) $
λ h, h.eq_or_lt.elim
(λ h, h ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, continuous_at_const])
(λ h, tendsto_id.nnrpow tendsto_const_nhds (or.inr h))
lemma continuous_rpow_const {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) :
continuous (λ x : ℝ≥0, x^y) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, continuous_at_rpow_const (or.inr h)
end nnreal
namespace ennreal
/-- The real power function `x^y` on extended nonnegative reals, defined for `x : ennreal` and
`y : ℝ` as the restriction of the real power function if `0 < x < ⊤`, and with the natural values
for `0` and `⊤` (i.e., `0 ^ x = 0` for `x > 0`, `1` for `x = 0` and `⊤` for `x < 0`, and
`⊤ ^ x = 1 / 0 ^ x`). -/
noncomputable def rpow : ennreal → ℝ → ennreal
| (some x) y := if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0)
| none y := if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0
noncomputable instance : has_pow ennreal ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_pow (x : ennreal) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
@[simp] lemma rpow_zero {x : ennreal} : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
by cases x; { dsimp only [(^), rpow], simp [lt_irrefl] }
lemma top_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (⊤ : ennreal) ^ y = if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma top_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (⊤ : ennreal) ^ y = ⊤ :=
by simp [top_rpow_def, h]
@[simp] lemma top_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (⊤ : ennreal) ^ y = 0 :=
by simp [top_rpow_def, asymm h, ne_of_lt h]
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (0 : ennreal) ^ y = 0 :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.coe_zero, ← ennreal.some_eq_coe],
dsimp only [(^), rpow],
simp [h, asymm h, ne_of_gt h],
end
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (0 : ennreal) ^ y = ⊤ :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.coe_zero, ← ennreal.some_eq_coe],
dsimp only [(^), rpow],
simp [h, ne_of_gt h],
end
lemma zero_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (0 : ennreal) ^ y = if 0 < y then 0 else if y = 0 then 1 else ⊤ :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 y with H|rfl|H,
{ simp [H, ne_of_gt, zero_rpow_of_pos, lt_irrefl] },
{ simp [lt_irrefl] },
{ simp [H, asymm H, ne_of_lt, zero_rpow_of_neg] }
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_rpow_of_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0} (h : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ennreal) ^ y = (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.some_eq_coe],
dsimp only [(^), rpow],
simp [h]
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_rpow_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) :
(x : ennreal) ^ y = (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with H|H,
{ simp [hx, H.symm] },
{ simp [hx, zero_rpow_of_pos H, nnreal.zero_rpow (ne_of_gt H)] } },
{ exact coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx _ }
end
lemma coe_rpow_def (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ennreal) ^ y = if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) := rfl
@[simp] lemma rpow_one (x : ennreal) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
by cases x; dsimp only [(^), rpow]; simp [zero_lt_one, not_lt_of_le zero_le_one]
@[simp] lemma one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ennreal) ^ x = 1 :=
by { rw [← coe_one, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero one_ne_zero], simp }
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ennreal} {y : ℝ} :
x ^ y = 0 ↔ (x = 0 ∧ 0 < y) ∨ (x = ⊤ ∧ y < 0) :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h] } }
end
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_top_iff {x : ennreal} {y : ℝ} :
x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ (x = 0 ∧ y < 0) ∨ (x = ⊤ ∧ 0 < y) :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h] } }
end
lemma rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg (x : ennreal) {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ y = ⊤ → x = ⊤ :=
begin
rw ennreal.rpow_eq_top_iff,
intro h,
cases h,
{ exfalso, rw lt_iff_not_ge at h, exact h.right hy0, },
{ exact h.left, },
end
lemma rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg {x : ennreal} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y ≠ ⊤ :=
mt (ennreal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg x hy0) h
lemma rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg {x : ennreal} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y < ⊤ :=
ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ennreal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg hy0 h)
lemma rpow_add {x : ennreal} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
begin
cases x, { exact (h'x rfl).elim },
have : x ≠ 0 := λ h, by simpa [h] using hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, nnreal.rpow_add this]
end
lemma rpow_neg (x : ennreal) (y : ℝ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr] },
{ have A : x ^ y ≠ 0, by simp [h],
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, ← coe_inv A, nnreal.rpow_neg] } }
end
lemma rpow_neg_one (x : ennreal) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x ⁻¹ :=
by simp [rpow_neg]
lemma rpow_mul (x : ennreal) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [h, Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg] },
{ have : x ^ y ≠ 0, by simp [h],
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, nnreal.rpow_mul] } }
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma rpow_nat_cast (x : ennreal) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
begin
cases x,
{ cases n;
simp [top_rpow_of_pos (nat.cast_add_one_pos _), top_pow (nat.succ_pos _)] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (nat.cast_nonneg n)] }
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_mul_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) :
((x : ennreal) * y) ^ z = x^z * y^z :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with H|H|H,
{ by_cases hx : x = 0; by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_neg, H] },
{ have : (y : ennreal) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hy],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, with_top.top_mul this] },
{ have : (x : ennreal) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hx],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_neg H, with_top.mul_top this] },
{ rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy],
simp [hx, hy] } },
{ simp [H] },
{ by_cases hx : x = 0; by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_pos, H] },
{ have : (y : ennreal) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hy],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_pos H, with_top.top_mul this] },
{ have : (x : ennreal) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hx],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_pos H, with_top.mul_top this] },
{ rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy],
simp [hx, hy] } },
end
lemma mul_rpow_of_ne_top {x y : ennreal} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) (hy : y ≠ ⊤) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x^z * y^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx,
lift y to ℝ≥0 using hy,
exact coe_mul_rpow x y z
end
lemma mul_rpow_of_ne_zero {x y : ennreal} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with H|H|H,
{ cases x; cases y,
{ simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_neg, H] },
{ have : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_neg, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_neg, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have hx' : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
have hy' : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp only [some_eq_coe],
rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx', coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy'],
simp [hx', hy'] } },
{ simp [H] },
{ cases x; cases y,
{ simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_pos, H] },
{ have : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_pos, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_pos, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have hx' : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
have hy' : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp only [some_eq_coe],
rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx', coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy'],
simp [hx', hy'] } }
end
lemma mul_rpow_of_nonneg (x y : ennreal) {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hz with H|H, { simp [← H] },
by_cases h : x = 0 ∨ y = 0,
{ cases h; simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos H] },
push_neg at h,
exact mul_rpow_of_ne_zero h.1 h.2 z
end
lemma inv_rpow_of_pos {x : ennreal} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : (x⁻¹) ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
begin
by_cases h0 : x = 0,
{ rw [h0, zero_rpow_of_pos hy, inv_zero, top_rpow_of_pos hy], },
by_cases h_top : x = ⊤,
{ rw [h_top, top_rpow_of_pos hy, inv_top, zero_rpow_of_pos hy], },
rw ←coe_to_nnreal h_top,
have h : x.to_nnreal ≠ 0,
{ rw [ne.def, to_nnreal_eq_zero_iff],
simp [h0, h_top], },
rw [←coe_inv h, coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hy), coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hy), ←coe_inv],
{ rw coe_eq_coe,
exact nnreal.inv_rpow x.to_nnreal y, },
{ simp [h], },
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow {x y : ennreal} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ y^z :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h₂ with H|H, { simp [← H, le_refl] },
cases y, { simp [top_rpow_of_pos H] },
cases x, { exact (not_top_le_coe h₁).elim },
simp at h₁,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ h₂, nnreal.rpow_le_rpow h₁ h₂]
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ennreal} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x^z < y^z :=
begin
cases x, { exact (not_top_lt h₁).elim },
cases y, { simp [top_rpow_of_pos h₂, coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt h₂)] },
simp at h₁,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt h₂), nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow h₁ h₂]
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ennreal} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hx' : x ≠ ⊤) (hyz : y < z) :
x^y < x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx',
rw [one_lt_coe_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz]
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ennreal} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [Hy, Hz, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_refl];
linarith },
{ simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz] }
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ennreal} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x^y < x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx1 le_top),
simp at hx0 hx1,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx0), nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz]
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ennreal} {y z : ℝ} (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx1 coe_lt_top),
by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [Hy, Hz, h, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_refl];
linarith },
{ simp at hx1,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h,
nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr h) hx1 hyz] }
end
lemma rpow_lt_one {x : ennreal} {z : ℝ} (hx : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < 1 :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx le_top),
simp only [coe_lt_one_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), nnreal.rpow_lt_one (zero_le x) hx hz],
end
lemma rpow_le_one {x : ennreal} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx coe_lt_top),
simp only [coe_le_one_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hz, nnreal.rpow_le_one hx hz],
end
lemma rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ennreal} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z < 1 :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_neg hz, ennreal.zero_lt_one] },
{ simp only [some_eq_coe, one_lt_coe_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz] },
end
lemma rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_neg {x : ennreal} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_neg hz, ennreal.zero_lt_one] },
{ simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx (le_of_lt hz)] },
end
lemma one_lt_rpow {x : ennreal} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x^z :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_pos hz] },
{ simp only [some_eq_coe, one_lt_coe_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), nnreal.one_lt_rpow hx hz] }
end
lemma one_le_rpow {x : ennreal} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_pos hz] },
{ simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), nnreal.one_le_rpow hx (le_of_lt hz)] },
end
lemma one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ennreal} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx2 le_top),
simp only [coe_lt_one_iff, coe_pos] at ⊢ hx1 hx2,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx1), nnreal.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz],
end
lemma one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_neg {x : ennreal} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx2 coe_lt_top),
simp only [coe_le_one_iff, coe_pos] at ⊢ hx1 hx2,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx1),
nnreal.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 (le_of_lt hz)],
end
lemma to_nnreal_rpow (x : ennreal) (z : ℝ) : (x.to_nnreal) ^ z = (x ^ z).to_nnreal :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with H|H|H,
{ cases x, { simp [H, ne_of_lt] },
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ simp [hx, H, ne_of_lt] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx] } },
{ simp [H] },
{ cases x, { simp [H, ne_of_gt] },
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt H)] }
end
lemma to_real_rpow (x : ennreal) (z : ℝ) : (x.to_real) ^ z = (x ^ z).to_real :=
by rw [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.to_real, ←nnreal.coe_rpow, ennreal.to_nnreal_rpow]
end ennreal
section measurability_ennreal
lemma ennreal.measurable_rpow : measurable (λ p : ennreal × ℝ, p.1 ^ p.2) :=
begin
refine ennreal.measurable_of_measurable_nnreal_prod _ _,
{ simp_rw ennreal.coe_rpow_def,
refine measurable.ite _ measurable_const nnreal.measurable_rpow.ennreal_coe,
exact is_measurable.inter (measurable_fst (is_measurable_singleton 0))
(measurable_snd is_measurable_Iio), },
{ simp_rw ennreal.top_rpow_def,
refine measurable.ite is_measurable_Ioi measurable_const _,
exact measurable.ite (is_measurable_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const, },
end
lemma measurable.ennreal_rpow {α} [measurable_space α] {f : α → ennreal} (hf : measurable f)
{g : α → ℝ} (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ (g a)) :=
begin
change measurable ((λ p : ennreal × ℝ, p.1 ^ p.2) ∘ (λ a, (f a, g a))),
exact ennreal.measurable_rpow.comp (measurable.prod hf hg),
end
lemma ennreal.measurable_rpow_const {y : ℝ} : measurable (λ a : ennreal, a ^ y) :=
begin
change measurable ((λ p : ennreal × ℝ, p.1 ^ p.2) ∘ (λ a, (a, y))),
refine ennreal.measurable_rpow.comp (measurable.prod measurable_id _),
dsimp only,
exact measurable_const,
end
lemma measurable.ennreal_rpow_const {α} [measurable_space α] {f : α → ennreal} (hf : measurable f)
{y : ℝ} :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ y) :=
hf.ennreal_rpow measurable_const
end measurability_ennreal
|
667bf1ceacbc903c9ae687da819ec8fffaac0300 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/ring_theory/valuation/integers.lean | 41adf37db6939ff144b01235fd1631296e3f331b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,225 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import ring_theory.valuation.basic
/-!
# Ring of integers under a given valuation
The elements with valuation less than or equal to 1.
TODO: Define characteristic predicate.
-/
universes u v w
namespace valuation
section ring
variables {R : Type u} {Γ₀ : Type v} [ring R] [linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero Γ₀]
variables (v : valuation R Γ₀)
/-- The ring of integers under a given valuation is the subring of elements with valuation ≤ 1. -/
def integer : subring R :=
{ carrier := { x | v x ≤ 1 },
one_mem' := le_of_eq v.map_one,
mul_mem' := λ x y hx hy, trans_rel_right (≤) (v.map_mul x y) (mul_le_one' hx hy),
zero_mem' := trans_rel_right (≤) v.map_zero zero_le_one',
add_mem' := λ x y hx hy, le_trans (v.map_add x y) (max_le hx hy),
neg_mem' := λ x hx, trans_rel_right (≤) (v.map_neg x) hx }
end ring
section comm_ring
variables {R : Type u} {Γ₀ : Type v} [comm_ring R] [linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero Γ₀]
variables (v : valuation R Γ₀)
variables (O : Type w) [comm_ring O] [algebra O R]
/-- Given a valuation v : R → Γ₀ and a ring homomorphism O →+* R, we say that O is the integers of v
if f is injective, and its range is exactly `v.integer`. -/
structure integers : Prop :=
(hom_inj : function.injective (algebra_map O R))
(map_le_one : ∀ x, v (algebra_map O R x) ≤ 1)
(exists_of_le_one : ∀ ⦃r⦄, v r ≤ 1 → ∃ x, algebra_map O R x = r)
-- typeclass shortcut
instance : algebra v.integer R :=
algebra.of_subring v.integer
theorem integer.integers : v.integers v.integer :=
{ hom_inj := subtype.coe_injective,
map_le_one := λ r, r.2,
exists_of_le_one := λ r hr, ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, rfl⟩ }
namespace integers
variables {v O} (hv : integers v O)
include hv
lemma one_of_is_unit {x : O} (hx : is_unit x) : v (algebra_map O R x) = 1 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hx in le_antisymm (hv.2 _) $
by { rw [← v.map_one, ← (algebra_map O R).map_one, ← u.mul_inv, ← mul_one (v (algebra_map O R x)),
hu, (algebra_map O R).map_mul, v.map_mul], exact mul_le_mul_left' (hv.2 (u⁻¹ : units O)) _ }
lemma is_unit_of_one {x : O} (hx : is_unit (algebra_map O R x)) (hvx : v (algebra_map O R x) = 1) :
is_unit x :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hx in
have h1 : v u ≤ 1, from hu.symm ▸ hv.2 x,
have h2 : v (u⁻¹ : units R) ≤ 1,
by rw [← one_mul (v _), ← hvx, ← v.map_mul, ← hu, u.mul_inv, hu, hvx, v.map_one],
let ⟨r1, hr1⟩ := hv.3 h1, ⟨r2, hr2⟩ := hv.3 h2 in
⟨⟨r1, r2, hv.1 $ by rw [ring_hom.map_mul, ring_hom.map_one, hr1, hr2, units.mul_inv],
hv.1 $ by rw [ring_hom.map_mul, ring_hom.map_one, hr1, hr2, units.inv_mul]⟩,
hv.1 $ hr1.trans hu⟩
lemma le_of_dvd {x y : O} (h : x ∣ y) : v (algebra_map O R y) ≤ v (algebra_map O R x) :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h in by { rw [← mul_one (v (algebra_map O R x)), hz, ring_hom.map_mul, v.map_mul],
exact mul_le_mul_left' (hv.2 z) _ }
end integers
end comm_ring
section field
variables {F : Type u} {Γ₀ : Type v} [field F] [linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero Γ₀]
variables {v : valuation F Γ₀} {O : Type w} [comm_ring O] [algebra O F] (hv : integers v O)
include hv
namespace integers
lemma dvd_of_le {x y : O} (h : v (algebra_map O F x) ≤ v (algebra_map O F y)) : y ∣ x :=
classical.by_cases (λ hy : algebra_map O F y = 0, have hx : x = 0,
from hv.1 $ (algebra_map O F).map_zero.symm ▸
(v.zero_iff.1 $ le_zero_iff.1 (v.map_zero ▸ hy ▸ h)),
hx.symm ▸ dvd_zero y) $
λ hy : algebra_map O F y ≠ 0,
have v ((algebra_map O F y)⁻¹ * algebra_map O F x) ≤ 1,
by { rw [← v.map_one, ← inv_mul_cancel hy, v.map_mul, v.map_mul], exact mul_le_mul_left' h _ },
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := hv.3 this in
⟨z, hv.1 $ ((algebra_map O F).map_mul y z).symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ (mul_inv_cancel_left₀ hy _).symm⟩
lemma dvd_iff_le {x y : O} : x ∣ y ↔ v (algebra_map O F y) ≤ v (algebra_map O F x) :=
⟨hv.le_of_dvd, hv.dvd_of_le⟩
lemma le_iff_dvd {x y : O} : v (algebra_map O F x) ≤ v (algebra_map O F y) ↔ y ∣ x :=
⟨hv.dvd_of_le, hv.le_of_dvd⟩
end integers
end field
end valuation
|
23f03593cac101dcef0865c4172bb32f5de2ef9d | f3a5af2927397cf346ec0e24312bfff077f00425 | /src/game/world2/level5.lean | f312cf78938122c32d0b92c4f2f6c1b7b8b89698 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ImperialCollegeLondon/natural_number_game | 05c39e1586408cfb563d1a12e1085a90726ab655 | f29b6c2884299fc63fdfc81ae5d7daaa3219f9fd | refs/heads/master | 1,688,570,964,990 | 1,636,908,242,000 | 1,636,908,242,000 | 195,403,790 | 277 | 84 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,547,955,000 | 1,562,328,792,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,070 | lean | import mynat.definition -- hide
import mynat.add -- hide
import game.world2.level4 -- hide
namespace mynat -- hide
/- Axiom : one_eq_succ_zero
1 = succ(0)
-/
/-
# Addition World
## Level 5: `succ_eq_add_one`
I've just added `one_eq_succ_zero` (a proof of `1 = succ(0)`) to your list of theorems; this is true
by definition of $1$, but we didn't need it until now.
Levels 5 and 6 are the two last levels in Addition World.
Level 5 involves the number $1$. When you see a $1$ in your goal,
you can write `rw one_eq_succ_zero` to get back
to something which only mentions `0`. This is a good move because $0$ is easier for us to
manipulate than $1$ right now, because we have
some theorems about $0$ (`zero_add`, `add_zero`), but, other than `1 = succ(0)`,
no theorems at all which mention $1$. Let's prove one now.
-/
/- Theorem
For any natural number $n$, we have
$$ \operatorname{succ}(n) = n+1. $$
-/
theorem succ_eq_add_one (n : mynat) : succ n = n + 1 :=
begin [nat_num_game]
rw one_eq_succ_zero,
rw add_succ,
rw add_zero,
refl,
end
end mynat -- hide
|
f7819fc7c51003bd232ad69d72e1a371bf80ab2c | 130c49f47783503e462c16b2eff31933442be6ff | /src/Init/Data/Nat/Div.lean | 338eaf0671d643e6b4630f7da9f2375f6f56f7e9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Hazel-Brown/lean4 | 8aa5860e282435ffc30dcdfccd34006c59d1d39c | 79e6732fc6bbf5af831b76f310f9c488d44e7a16 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,218,208,951 | 1,629,736,869,000 | 1,629,736,896,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,828 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.WF
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
namespace Nat
private def div_rec_lemma {x y : Nat} : 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x → x - y < x :=
fun ⟨ypos, ylex⟩ => sub_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ypos ylex) ypos
private def div.F (x : Nat) (f : ∀ x₁, x₁ < x → Nat → Nat) (y : Nat) : Nat :=
if h : 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then f (x - y) (div_rec_lemma h) y + 1 else zero
@[extern "lean_nat_div"]
protected def div (a b : @& Nat) : Nat :=
WellFounded.fix ltWf div.F a b
instance : Div Nat := ⟨Nat.div⟩
private theorem div_eq_aux (x y : Nat) : x / y = if h : 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then (x - y) / y + 1 else 0 :=
congrFun (WellFounded.fix_eq ltWf div.F x) y
theorem div_eq (x y : Nat) : x / y = if 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then (x - y) / y + 1 else 0 :=
dif_eq_if (0 < y ∧ y ≤ x) ((x - y) / y + 1) 0 ▸ div_eq_aux x y
private theorem div.induction.F.{u}
(C : Nat → Nat → Sort u)
(ind : ∀ x y, 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x → C (x - y) y → C x y)
(base : ∀ x y, ¬(0 < y ∧ y ≤ x) → C x y)
(x : Nat) (f : ∀ (x₁ : Nat), x₁ < x → ∀ (y : Nat), C x₁ y) (y : Nat) : C x y :=
if h : 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then ind x y h (f (x - y) (div_rec_lemma h) y) else base x y h
theorem div.inductionOn.{u}
{motive : Nat → Nat → Sort u}
(x y : Nat)
(ind : ∀ x y, 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x → motive (x - y) y → motive x y)
(base : ∀ x y, ¬(0 < y ∧ y ≤ x) → motive x y)
: motive x y :=
WellFounded.fix Nat.ltWf (div.induction.F motive ind base) x y
private def mod.F (x : Nat) (f : ∀ x₁, x₁ < x → Nat → Nat) (y : Nat) : Nat :=
if h : 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then f (x - y) (div_rec_lemma h) y else x
@[extern "lean_nat_mod"]
protected def mod (a b : @& Nat) : Nat :=
WellFounded.fix ltWf mod.F a b
instance : Mod Nat := ⟨Nat.mod⟩
private theorem mod_eq_aux (x y : Nat) : x % y = if h : 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then (x - y) % y else x :=
congrFun (WellFounded.fix_eq ltWf mod.F x) y
theorem mod_eq (x y : Nat) : x % y = if 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then (x - y) % y else x :=
dif_eq_if (0 < y ∧ y ≤ x) ((x - y) % y) x ▸ mod_eq_aux x y
theorem mod.inductionOn.{u}
{motive : Nat → Nat → Sort u}
(x y : Nat)
(ind : ∀ x y, 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x → motive (x - y) y → motive x y)
(base : ∀ x y, ¬(0 < y ∧ y ≤ x) → motive x y)
: motive x y :=
div.inductionOn x y ind base
theorem mod_zero (a : Nat) : a % 0 = a :=
have : (if 0 < 0 ∧ 0 ≤ a then (a - 0) % 0 else a) = a :=
have h : ¬ (0 < 0 ∧ 0 ≤ a) := fun ⟨h₁, _⟩ => absurd h₁ (Nat.lt_irrefl _)
if_neg h
(mod_eq a 0).symm ▸ this
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Nat} (h : a < b) : a % b = a :=
have : (if 0 < b ∧ b ≤ a then (a - b) % b else a) = a :=
have h' : ¬(0 < b ∧ b ≤ a) := fun ⟨_, h₁⟩ => absurd h₁ (Nat.not_le_of_gt h)
if_neg h'
(mod_eq a b).symm ▸ this
theorem mod_eq_sub_mod {a b : Nat} (h : a ≥ b) : a % b = (a - b) % b :=
match eq_zero_or_pos b with
| Or.inl h₁ => h₁.symm ▸ (Nat.sub_zero a).symm ▸ rfl
| Or.inr h₁ => (mod_eq a b).symm ▸ if_pos ⟨h₁, h⟩
theorem mod_lt (x : Nat) {y : Nat} : y > 0 → x % y < y := by
induction x, y using mod.inductionOn with
| base x y h₁ =>
intro h₂
have h₁ : ¬ 0 < y ∨ ¬ y ≤ x := Iff.mp (Decidable.not_and_iff_or_not _ _) h₁
match h₁ with
| Or.inl h₁ => exact absurd h₂ h₁
| Or.inr h₁ =>
have hgt : y > x := gt_of_not_le h₁
have heq : x % y = x := mod_eq_of_lt hgt
rw [← heq] at hgt
exact hgt
| ind x y h h₂ =>
intro h₃
have ⟨_, h₁⟩ := h
rw [mod_eq_sub_mod h₁]
exact h₂ h₃
theorem mod_le (x y : Nat) : x % y ≤ x := by
match Nat.lt_or_ge x y with
| Or.inl h₁ => rw [mod_eq_of_lt h₁]; apply Nat.le_refl
| Or.inr h₁ => match eq_zero_or_pos y with
| Or.inl h₂ => rw [h₂, Nat.mod_zero x]; apply Nat.le_refl
| Or.inr h₂ => exact Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_of_lt (mod_lt _ h₂)) h₁
@[simp] theorem zero_mod (b : Nat) : 0 % b = 0 := by
rw [mod_eq]
have : ¬ (0 < b ∧ b ≤ 0) := by
intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact absurd (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h₁ h₂) (Nat.lt_irrefl 0)
simp [this]
@[simp] theorem mod_self (n : Nat) : n % n = 0 := by
rw [mod_eq_sub_mod (Nat.le_refl _), Nat.sub_self, zero_mod]
theorem mod_one (x : Nat) : x % 1 = 0 := by
have h : x % 1 < 1 := mod_lt x (by decide)
have : (y : Nat) → y < 1 → y = 0 := by
intro y
cases y with
| zero => intro h; rfl
| succ y => intro h; apply absurd (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) (Nat.not_lt_zero y)
exact this _ h
end Nat
|
5fd4e5f8fa58c897443e91f81667a5997d1fa7ee | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/algebra/order/algebra.lean | 470a053ddba01a76222128d13bb501ea2c2b2b23 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,711 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebra.algebra.basic
import algebra.order.module
/-!
# Ordered algebras
An ordered algebra is an ordered semiring, which is an algebra over an ordered commutative semiring,
for which scalar multiplication is "compatible" with the two orders.
The prototypical example is 2x2 matrices over the reals or complexes (or indeed any C^* algebra)
where the ordering the one determined by the positive cone of positive operators,
i.e. `A ≤ B` iff `B - A = star R * R` for some `R`.
(We don't yet have this example in mathlib.)
## Implementation
Because the axioms for an ordered algebra are exactly the same as those for the underlying
module being ordered, we don't actually introduce a new class, but just use the `ordered_smul`
mixin.
## Tags
ordered algebra
-/
section ordered_algebra
variables {R A : Type*} {a b : A} {r : R}
variables [ordered_comm_ring R] [ordered_ring A] [algebra R A] [ordered_smul R A]
lemma algebra_map_monotone : monotone (algebra_map R A) :=
λ a b h,
begin
rw [algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, ←sub_nonneg, ←sub_smul],
transitivity (b - a) • (0 : A),
{ simp, },
{ exact smul_le_smul_of_nonneg zero_le_one (sub_nonneg.mpr h) }
end
end ordered_algebra
section instances
variables {R : Type*} [linear_ordered_comm_ring R]
instance linear_ordered_comm_ring.to_ordered_smul : ordered_smul R R :=
{ smul_lt_smul_of_pos := ordered_semiring.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left,
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_pos := λ a b c w₁ w₂, (mul_lt_mul_left w₂).mp w₁ }
end instances
|
abc20cb980f3ce2787d0105db12dc4f6558dfdc2 | 037dba89703a79cd4a4aec5e959818147f97635d | /src/2020/functions/bijection_game.lean | 53c47777e627cc216c9271c98f025360a6d887d9 | [] | no_license | ImperialCollegeLondon/M40001_lean | 3a6a09298da395ab51bc220a535035d45bbe919b | 62a76fa92654c855af2b2fc2bef8e60acd16ccec | refs/heads/master | 1,666,750,403,259 | 1,665,771,117,000 | 1,665,771,117,000 | 209,141,835 | 115 | 12 | null | 1,640,270,596,000 | 1,568,749,174,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,735 | lean | import tactic
-- experiments with bijections
/-
#check infinite
#print prefix infinite
#print infinite
#print int.infinite
#check infinite.of_injective
example : infinite ℕ := by apply_instance
example : infinite ℤ := by show_term {apply_instance}
#check rat.of_int
-/
example : infinite ℚ := infinite.of_injective (coe : ℤ → ℚ)
begin
intros a b,
intro h,
exact (rat.coe_int_inj a b).mp h,
end
namespace countably_infinite
example (a b : ℕ) : 2 * a = 2 * b → a = b := by
begin
intro h,
apply mul_right_injective₀ _ h,
norm_num,
end
def bool_times_nat : bool × ℕ ≃ ℕ :=
{ to_fun := λ bn, if bn.1 = tt then bn.2 * 2 else bn.2 * 2 + 1,
inv_fun := λ d, ⟨d % 2 = 0, d / 2⟩,
left_inv := begin
intro bn,
cases bn with b n,
cases b,
-- TODO -- make snippet
{ suffices : ¬(1 + 2 * n) % 2 = 0 ∧ (1 + 2 * n) / 2 = n,
simpa [mul_comm, add_comm],
have h : (1 + 2 * n) % 2 = 1,
simp,
split,
{ simp },
{ have h2 := nat.mod_add_div (1 + 2 * n) 2,
have h3 : 2 * ((1 + 2 * n) / 2) = 2 * n →
(1 + 2 * n) / 2 = n := λ h, mul_right_injective₀ _ h,
simp * at *, cc } },
{ simp }
end
,
right_inv := begin
intro n,
suffices : ite (n % 2 = 0) (n / 2 * 2) (n / 2 * 2 + 1) = n,
simpa,
split_ifs,
{ have h2 := nat.mod_add_div n 2,
rwa [h, zero_add, mul_comm] at h2,
},
{ have h2 := nat.mod_add_div n 2,
rw [add_comm, mul_comm] at h2,
convert h2,
rcases nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with (h3 | h3),
{ contradiction },
{ rw h3 }}
end
}
-- example (X : Type) (h : X ≃ ℕ) : X ≃ X × bool := sorry
end countably_infinite
|
95f61615304da5730d5b1d190d1dcfb5c8930320 | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /test/refine_struct.lean | 578e7722807493063d97d823a3638f20a7e27240 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,875 | lean | import tactic.interactive
/-!
`refine_struct` caused a variety of interesting problems,
which were identified in
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/2251
and
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Need.20help.20with.20class.20instance.20resolution
These tests are quite specific to testing the patch made in
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/2319
and are not a complete test suite for `refine_struct`.
-/
instance pi_has_one {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π x, has_one (β x)] : has_one (Π x, β x) :=
by refine_struct { .. }; exact λ _, 1
open tactic
run_cmd (do
(declaration.defn _ _ _ b _ _) ← get_decl ``pi_has_one,
-- Make sure that `eq.mpr` really doesn't occur in the body:
when (b.list_constant.contains ``eq.mpr) $
fail "result generated by `refine_struct` contained an unnecessary `eq.mpr`",
-- Make sure that `id` really doesn't occur in the body:
when (b.list_constant.contains ``id) $
fail "result generated by `refine_struct` contained an unnecessary `id`")
-- Next we check that fields defined for embedded structures are unfolded
-- when seen by fields in the outer structure.
structure foo (α : Type):=
(a : α)
structure bar (α : Type) extends foo α :=
(b : a = a)
example : bar ℕ :=
begin
refine_struct { a := 1, .. },
-- We're making sure that the goal is
-- ⊢ 1 = 1
-- rather than
-- ⊢ {a := 1}.a = {a := 1}.a
guard_target 1 = 1,
trivial
end
section
variables {α : Type} [_inst : monoid α]
include _inst
example : true :=
begin
have : group α,
{ refine_struct { .._inst },
guard_tags _field inv group, admit,
guard_tags _field mul_left_inv group, admit, },
trivial
end
end
def my_foo {α} (x : semigroup α) (y : group α) : true := trivial
example {α : Type} : true :=
begin
have : true,
{ refine_struct (@my_foo α { .. } { .. } ),
-- 9 goals
guard_tags _field mul semigroup, admit,
-- case semigroup, mul
-- α : Type
-- ⊢ α → α → α
guard_tags _field mul_assoc semigroup, admit,
-- case semigroup, mul_assoc
-- α : Type
-- ⊢ ∀ (a b c : α), a * b * c = a * (b * c)
guard_tags _field mul group, admit,
-- case group, mul
-- α : Type
-- ⊢ α → α → α
guard_tags _field mul_assoc group, admit,
-- case group, mul_assoc
-- α : Type
-- ⊢ ∀ (a b c : α), a * b * c = a * (b * c)
guard_tags _field one group, admit,
-- case group, one
-- α : Type
-- ⊢ α
guard_tags _field one_mul group, admit,
-- case group, one_mul
-- α : Type
-- ⊢ ∀ (a : α), 1 * a = a
guard_tags _field mul_one group, admit,
-- case group, mul_one
-- α : Type
-- ⊢ ∀ (a : α), a * 1 = a
guard_tags _field inv group, admit,
-- case group, inv
-- α : Type
-- ⊢ α → α
guard_tags _field mul_left_inv group, admit,
-- case group, mul_left_inv
-- α : Type
-- ⊢ ∀ (a : α), a⁻¹ * a = 1
},
trivial
end
def my_bar {α} (x : semigroup α) (y : group α) (i j : α) : α := i
example {α : Type} : true :=
begin
have : monoid α,
{ refine_struct { mul := my_bar { .. } { .. } },
guard_tags _field mul semigroup, admit,
guard_tags _field mul_assoc semigroup, admit,
guard_tags _field mul group, admit,
guard_tags _field mul_assoc group, admit,
guard_tags _field one group, admit,
guard_tags _field one_mul group, admit,
guard_tags _field mul_one group, admit,
guard_tags _field inv group, admit,
guard_tags _field mul_left_inv group, admit,
guard_tags _field mul_assoc monoid, admit,
guard_tags _field one monoid, admit,
guard_tags _field one_mul monoid, admit,
guard_tags _field mul_one monoid, admit, },
trivial
end
|
912ea46b87eb570948f2dcd5fb331b864ac5c54f | 6065973b1fa7bbacba932011c9e2f32bf7bdd6c1 | /src/linear_algebra/basic.lean | 64d11197cf1825df3e898e8b197b5b1cc4c33d13 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | khmacdonald/mathlib | 90a0fa2222369fa69ed2fbfb841b74d2bdfd66cb | 3669cb35c578441812ad30fd967d21a94b6f387e | refs/heads/master | 1,675,863,801,090 | 1,609,761,876,000 | 1,609,761,876,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 106,109 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.big_operators.pi
import algebra.module.pi
import algebra.module.prod
import algebra.module.submodule
import algebra.group.prod
import data.finsupp.basic
import algebra.pointwise
/-!
# Linear algebra
This file defines the basics of linear algebra. It sets up the "categorical/lattice structure" of
modules over a ring, submodules, and linear maps. If `p` and `q` are submodules of a module, `p ≤ q`
means that `p ⊆ q`.
Many of the relevant definitions, including `module`, `submodule`, and `linear_map`, are found in
`src/algebra/module`.
## Main definitions
* Many constructors for linear maps, including `prod` and `coprod`
* `submodule.span s` is defined to be the smallest submodule containing the set `s`.
* If `p` is a submodule of `M`, `submodule.quotient p` is the quotient of `M` with respect to `p`:
that is, elements of `M` are identified if their difference is in `p`. This is itself a module.
* The kernel `ker` and range `range` of a linear map are submodules of the domain and codomain
respectively.
* The general linear group is defined to be the group of invertible linear maps from `M` to itself.
## Main statements
* The first and second isomorphism laws for modules are proved as `quot_ker_equiv_range` and
`quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient`.
## Notations
* We continue to use the notation `M →ₗ[R] M₂` for the type of linear maps from `M` to `M₂` over the
ring `R`.
* We introduce the notations `M ≃ₗ M₂` and `M ≃ₗ[R] M₂` for `linear_equiv M M₂`. In the first, the
ring `R` is implicit.
* We introduce the notation `R ∙ v` for the span of a singleton, `submodule.span R {v}`. This is
`\.`, not the same as the scalar multiplication `•`/`\bub`.
## Implementation notes
We note that, when constructing linear maps, it is convenient to use operations defined on bundled
maps (`prod`, `coprod`, arithmetic operations like `+`) instead of defining a function and proving
it is linear.
## Tags
linear algebra, vector space, module
-/
open function
open_locale big_operators
universes u v w x y z u' v' w' y'
variables {R : Type u} {K : Type u'} {M : Type v} {V : Type v'} {M₂ : Type w} {V₂ : Type w'}
variables {M₃ : Type y} {V₃ : Type y'} {M₄ : Type z} {ι : Type x}
namespace finsupp
lemma smul_sum {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {R : Type w} {M : Type y}
[has_zero β] [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
{v : α →₀ β} {c : R} {h : α → β → M} :
c • (v.sum h) = v.sum (λa b, c • h a b) :=
finset.smul_sum
end finsupp
section
open_locale classical
/-- decomposing `x : ι → R` as a sum along the canonical basis -/
lemma pi_eq_sum_univ {ι : Type u} [fintype ι] {R : Type v} [semiring R] (x : ι → R) :
x = ∑ i, x i • (λj, if i = j then 1 else 0) :=
by { ext, simp }
end
/-! ### Properties of linear maps -/
namespace linear_map
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃] [add_comm_monoid M₄]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] [semimodule R M₄]
variables (f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
include R
@[simp] theorem comp_id : f.comp id = f :=
linear_map.ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp : id.comp f = f :=
linear_map.ext $ λ x, rfl
theorem comp_assoc (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (h : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) : (h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) :=
rfl
/-- The restriction of a linear map `f : M → M₂` to a submodule `p ⊆ M` gives a linear map
`p → M₂`. -/
def dom_restrict (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M) : p →ₗ[R] M₂ := f.comp p.subtype
@[simp] lemma dom_restrict_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M) (x : p) :
f.dom_restrict p x = f x := rfl
/-- A linear map `f : M₂ → M` whose values lie in a submodule `p ⊆ M` can be restricted to a
linear map M₂ → p. -/
def cod_restrict (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (h : ∀c, f c ∈ p) : M₂ →ₗ[R] p :=
by refine {to_fun := λc, ⟨f c, h c⟩, ..}; intros; apply set_coe.ext; simp
@[simp] theorem cod_restrict_apply (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) {h} (x : M₂) :
(cod_restrict p f h x : M) = f x := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀b, f b ∈ p) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M) :
(cod_restrict p f h).comp g = cod_restrict p (f.comp g) (assume b, h _) :=
ext $ assume b, rfl
@[simp] lemma subtype_comp_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀b, f b ∈ p) :
p.subtype.comp (cod_restrict p f h) = f :=
ext $ assume b, rfl
/-- Restrict domain and codomain of an endomorphism. -/
def restrict (f : M →ₗ[R] M) {p : submodule R M} (hf : ∀ x ∈ p, f x ∈ p) : p →ₗ[R] p :=
(f.dom_restrict p).cod_restrict p $ submodule.forall.2 hf
lemma restrict_apply
{f : M →ₗ[R] M} {p : submodule R M} (hf : ∀ x ∈ p, f x ∈ p) (x : p) :
f.restrict hf x = ⟨f x, hf x.1 x.2⟩ := rfl
lemma subtype_comp_restrict {f : M →ₗ[R] M} {p : submodule R M} (hf : ∀ x ∈ p, f x ∈ p) :
p.subtype.comp (f.restrict hf) = f.dom_restrict p := rfl
lemma restrict_eq_cod_restrict_dom_restrict
{f : M →ₗ[R] M} {p : submodule R M} (hf : ∀ x ∈ p, f x ∈ p) :
f.restrict hf = (f.dom_restrict p).cod_restrict p (λ x, hf x.1 x.2) := rfl
lemma restrict_eq_dom_restrict_cod_restrict
{f : M →ₗ[R] M} {p : submodule R M} (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
f.restrict (λ x _, hf x) = (f.cod_restrict p hf).dom_restrict p := rfl
/-- The constant 0 map is linear. -/
instance : has_zero (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨⟨λ _, 0, by simp, by simp⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply (x : M) : (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂) x = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma default_def : default (M →ₗ[R] M₂) = 0 := rfl
instance unique_of_left [subsingleton M] : unique (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
{ uniq := λ f, ext $ λ x, by rw [subsingleton.elim x 0, map_zero, map_zero],
.. linear_map.inhabited }
instance unique_of_right [subsingleton M₂] : unique (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
coe_injective.unique
/-- The sum of two linear maps is linear. -/
instance : has_add (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨λ b, f b + g b, by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm], by simp [smul_add]⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply (x : M) : (f + g) x = f x + g x := rfl
/-- The type of linear maps is an additive monoid. -/
instance : add_comm_monoid (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
by refine {zero := 0, add := (+), ..};
intros; ext; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
instance linear_map_apply_is_add_monoid_hom (a : M) :
is_add_monoid_hom (λ f : M →ₗ[R] M₂, f a) :=
{ map_add := λ f g, linear_map.add_apply f g a,
map_zero := rfl }
lemma add_comp (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (h : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(h + g).comp f = h.comp f + g.comp f := rfl
lemma comp_add (g : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
h.comp (f + g) = h.comp f + h.comp g := by { ext, simp }
lemma sum_apply (t : finset ι) (f : ι → M →ₗ[R] M₂) (b : M) :
(∑ d in t, f d) b = ∑ d in t, f d b :=
(t.sum_hom (λ g : M →ₗ[R] M₂, g b)).symm
/-- `λb, f b • x` is a linear map. -/
def smul_right (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (x : M) : M₂ →ₗ[R] M :=
⟨λb, f b • x, by simp [add_smul], by simp [smul_smul]⟩.
@[simp] theorem smul_right_apply (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (x : M) (c : M₂) :
(smul_right f x : M₂ → M) c = f c • x := rfl
instance : has_one (M →ₗ[R] M) := ⟨linear_map.id⟩
instance : has_mul (M →ₗ[R] M) := ⟨linear_map.comp⟩
lemma mul_eq_comp (f g : M →ₗ[R] M) : f * g = f.comp g := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_app (x : M) : (1 : M →ₗ[R] M) x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma mul_app (A B : M →ₗ[R] M) (x : M) : (A * B) x = A (B x) := rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_zero : f.comp (0 : M₃ →ₗ[R] M) = 0 :=
ext $ assume c, by rw [comp_apply, zero_apply, zero_apply, f.map_zero]
@[simp] theorem zero_comp : (0 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp f = 0 :=
rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_fn_sum {ι : Type*} (t : finset ι) (f : ι → M →ₗ[R] M₂) :
⇑(∑ i in t, f i) = ∑ i in t, (f i : M → M₂) :=
add_monoid_hom.map_sum ⟨@to_fun R M M₂ _ _ _ _ _, rfl, λ x y, rfl⟩ _ _
instance : monoid (M →ₗ[R] M) :=
by refine {mul := (*), one := 1, ..}; { intros, apply linear_map.ext, simp {proj := ff} }
section
open_locale classical
/-- A linear map `f` applied to `x : ι → R` can be computed using the image under `f` of elements
of the canonical basis. -/
lemma pi_apply_eq_sum_univ [fintype ι] (f : (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M) (x : ι → R) :
f x = ∑ i, x i • (f (λj, if i = j then 1 else 0)) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [pi_eq_sum_univ x, f.map_sum] },
apply finset.sum_congr rfl (λl hl, _),
rw f.map_smul
end
end
section
variables (R M M₂)
/-- The first projection of a product is a linear map. -/
def fst : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M := ⟨prod.fst, λ x y, rfl, λ x y, rfl⟩
/-- The second projection of a product is a linear map. -/
def snd : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂ := ⟨prod.snd, λ x y, rfl, λ x y, rfl⟩
end
@[simp] theorem fst_apply (x : M × M₂) : fst R M M₂ x = x.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_apply (x : M × M₂) : snd R M M₂ x = x.2 := rfl
/-- The prod of two linear maps is a linear map. -/
def prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃ :=
{ to_fun := λ x, (f x, g x),
map_add' := λ x y, by simp only [prod.mk_add_mk, map_add],
map_smul' := λ c x, by simp only [prod.smul_mk, map_smul] }
@[simp] theorem prod_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (x : M) :
prod f g x = (f x, g x) := rfl
@[simp] theorem fst_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(fst R M₂ M₃).comp (prod f g) = f := by ext; refl
@[simp] theorem snd_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(snd R M₂ M₃).comp (prod f g) = g := by ext; refl
@[simp] theorem pair_fst_snd : prod (fst R M M₂) (snd R M M₂) = linear_map.id :=
by ext; refl
section
variables (R M M₂)
/-- The left injection into a product is a linear map. -/
def inl : M →ₗ[R] M × M₂ := by refine ⟨add_monoid_hom.inl _ _, _, _⟩; intros; simp
/-- The right injection into a product is a linear map. -/
def inr : M₂ →ₗ[R] M × M₂ := by refine ⟨add_monoid_hom.inr _ _, _, _⟩; intros; simp
end
@[simp] theorem inl_apply (x : M) : inl R M M₂ x = (x, 0) := rfl
@[simp] theorem inr_apply (x : M₂) : inr R M M₂ x = (0, x) := rfl
theorem inl_injective : function.injective (inl R M M₂) :=
λ _, by simp
theorem inr_injective : function.injective (inr R M M₂) :=
λ _, by simp
/-- The coprod function `λ x : M × M₂, f x.1 + g x.2` is a linear map. -/
def coprod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ :=
{ to_fun := λ x, f x.1 + g x.2,
map_add' := λ x y, by simp only [map_add, prod.snd_add, prod.fst_add]; cc,
map_smul' := λ x y, by simp only [smul_add, prod.smul_snd, prod.smul_fst, map_smul] }
@[simp] theorem coprod_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (x : M) (y : M₂) :
coprod f g (x, y) = f x + g y := rfl
@[simp] theorem coprod_inl (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(coprod f g).comp (inl R M M₂) = f :=
by ext; simp only [map_zero, add_zero, coprod_apply, inl_apply, comp_apply]
@[simp] theorem coprod_inr (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(coprod f g).comp (inr R M M₂) = g :=
by ext; simp only [map_zero, coprod_apply, inr_apply, zero_add, comp_apply]
@[simp] theorem coprod_inl_inr : coprod (inl R M M₂) (inr R M M₂) = linear_map.id :=
by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp only [prod.mk_add_mk, add_zero, id_apply, coprod_apply,
inl_apply, inr_apply, zero_add]
theorem fst_eq_coprod : fst R M M₂ = coprod linear_map.id 0 := by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
theorem snd_eq_coprod : snd R M M₂ = coprod 0 linear_map.id := by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
theorem inl_eq_prod : inl R M M₂ = prod linear_map.id 0 := rfl
theorem inr_eq_prod : inr R M M₂ = prod 0 linear_map.id := rfl
/-- `prod.map` of two linear maps. -/
def prod_map (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) : (M × M₂) →ₗ[R] (M₃ × M₄) :=
(f.comp (fst R M M₂)).prod (g.comp (snd R M M₂))
@[simp] theorem prod_map_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) (x) :
f.prod_map g x = (f x.1, g x.2) := rfl
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables [semiring R]
[add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃] [add_comm_group M₄]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] [semimodule R M₄]
(f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
/-- The negation of a linear map is linear. -/
instance : has_neg (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨λ b, - f b, by simp [add_comm], by simp⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_apply (x : M) : (- f) x = - f x := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_neg (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : g.comp (- f) = - g.comp f := by { ext, simp }
/-- The negation of a linear map is linear. -/
instance : has_sub (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
⟨λ f g,
⟨λ b, f b - g b,
by { simp only [map_add, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add], cc },
by { intros, simp only [map_smul, smul_sub] }⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma sub_apply (x : M) : (f - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
lemma sub_comp (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (h : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(g - h).comp f = g.comp f - h.comp f := rfl
lemma comp_sub (g : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
h.comp (g - f) = h.comp g - h.comp f := by { ext, simp }
/-- The type of linear maps is an additive group. -/
instance : add_comm_group (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
by refine {zero := 0, add := (+), neg := has_neg.neg, sub := has_sub.sub, sub_eq_add_neg := _, ..};
intros; ext; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]
instance linear_map_apply_is_add_group_hom (a : M) :
is_add_group_hom (λ f : M →ₗ[R] M₂, f a) :=
{ map_add := λ f g, linear_map.add_apply f g a }
end add_comm_group
section has_scalar
variables {S : Type*} [semiring R] [monoid S]
[add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
[distrib_mul_action S M₂] [smul_comm_class R S M₂]
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
instance : has_scalar S (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
⟨λ a f, ⟨λ b, a • f b, λ x y, by rw [f.map_add, smul_add],
λ c x, by simp only [f.map_smul, smul_comm c]⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma smul_apply (a : S) (x : M) : (a • f) x = a • f x := rfl
instance : distrib_mul_action S (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
{ one_smul := λ f, ext $ λ _, one_smul _ _,
mul_smul := λ c c' f, ext $ λ _, mul_smul _ _ _,
smul_add := λ c f g, ext $ λ x, smul_add _ _ _,
smul_zero := λ c, ext $ λ x, smul_zero _ }
theorem smul_comp (a : S) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₂) (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : (a • g).comp f = a • (g.comp f) :=
rfl
end has_scalar
section semimodule
variables {S : Type*} [semiring R] [semiring S]
[add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
[semimodule S M₂] [semimodule S M₃] [smul_comm_class R S M₂] [smul_comm_class R S M₃]
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
instance : semimodule S (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
{ add_smul := λ a b f, ext $ λ x, add_smul _ _ _,
zero_smul := λ f, ext $ λ x, zero_smul _ _ }
variable (S)
/-- Applying a linear map at `v : M`, seen as `S`-linear map from `M →ₗ[R] M₂` to `M₂`.
See `applyₗ` for a version where `S = R` -/
def applyₗ' (v : M) : (M →ₗ[R] M₂) →ₗ[S] M₂ :=
{ to_fun := λ f, f v,
map_add' := λ f g, f.add_apply g v,
map_smul' := λ x f, f.smul_apply x v }
end semimodule
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
variables (f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
include R
theorem comp_smul (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (a : R) : g.comp (a • f) = a • (g.comp f) :=
ext $ assume b, by rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, g.map_smul]; refl
/-- Composition by `f : M₂ → M₃` is a linear map from the space of linear maps `M → M₂`
to the space of linear maps `M₂ → M₃`. -/
def comp_right (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (M →ₗ[R] M₂) →ₗ[R] (M →ₗ[R] M₃) :=
⟨f.comp,
λ _ _, linear_map.ext $ λ _, f.2 _ _,
λ _ _, linear_map.ext $ λ _, f.3 _ _⟩
/-- Applying a linear map at `v : M`, seen as a linear map from `M →ₗ[R] M₂` to `M₂`.
See also `linear_map.applyₗ'` for a version that works with two different semirings. -/
def applyₗ (v : M) : (M →ₗ[R] M₂) →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
applyₗ' R v
end comm_semiring
section semiring
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
instance endomorphism_semiring : semiring (M →ₗ[R] M) :=
by refine {mul := (*), one := 1, ..linear_map.add_comm_monoid, ..};
{ intros, apply linear_map.ext, simp {proj := ff} }
lemma mul_apply (f g : M →ₗ[R] M) (x : M) : (f * g) x = f (g x) := rfl
end semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [semimodule R M]
instance endomorphism_ring : ring (M →ₗ[R] M) :=
{ ..linear_map.endomorphism_semiring, ..linear_map.add_comm_group }
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
/--
The family of linear maps `M₂ → M` parameterised by `f ∈ M₂ → R`, `x ∈ M`, is linear in `f`, `x`.
-/
def smul_rightₗ : (M₂ →ₗ[R] R) →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M :=
{ to_fun := λ f, {
to_fun := linear_map.smul_right f,
map_add' := λ m m', by { ext, apply smul_add, },
map_smul' := λ c m, by { ext, apply smul_comm, } },
map_add' := λ f f', by { ext, apply add_smul, },
map_smul' := λ c f, by { ext, apply mul_smul, } }
@[simp] lemma smul_rightₗ_apply (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (x : M) (c : M₂) :
(smul_rightₗ : (M₂ →ₗ R) →ₗ M →ₗ M₂ →ₗ M) f x c = (f c) • x := rfl
end comm_ring
end linear_map
/-! ### Properties of submodules -/
namespace submodule
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
variables (p p' : submodule R M) (q q' : submodule R M₂)
variables {r : R} {x y : M}
open set
instance : partial_order (submodule R M) :=
{ le := λ p p', ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ p → x ∈ p',
..partial_order.lift (coe : submodule R M → set M) coe_injective }
variables {p p'}
lemma le_def : p ≤ p' ↔ (p : set M) ⊆ p' := iff.rfl
lemma le_def' : p ≤ p' ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, x ∈ p' := iff.rfl
lemma lt_def : p < p' ↔ (p : set M) ⊂ p' := iff.rfl
lemma not_le_iff_exists : ¬ (p ≤ p') ↔ ∃ x ∈ p, x ∉ p' := not_subset
lemma exists_of_lt {p p' : submodule R M} : p < p' → ∃ x ∈ p', x ∉ p := exists_of_ssubset
lemma lt_iff_le_and_exists : p < p' ↔ p ≤ p' ∧ ∃ x ∈ p', x ∉ p :=
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, not_le_iff_exists]
/-- If two submodules `p` and `p'` satisfy `p ⊆ p'`, then `of_le p p'` is the linear map version of
this inclusion. -/
def of_le (h : p ≤ p') : p →ₗ[R] p' :=
p.subtype.cod_restrict p' $ λ ⟨x, hx⟩, h hx
@[simp] theorem coe_of_le (h : p ≤ p') (x : p) :
(of_le h x : M) = x := rfl
theorem of_le_apply (h : p ≤ p') (x : p) : of_le h x = ⟨x, h x.2⟩ := rfl
variables (p p')
lemma subtype_comp_of_le (p q : submodule R M) (h : p ≤ q) :
q.subtype.comp (of_le h) = p.subtype :=
by { ext ⟨b, hb⟩, refl }
/-- The set `{0}` is the bottom element of the lattice of submodules. -/
instance : has_bot (submodule R M) :=
⟨{ carrier := {0}, smul_mem' := by simp { contextual := tt }, .. (⊥ : add_submonoid M)}⟩
instance inhabited' : inhabited (submodule R M) := ⟨⊥⟩
@[simp] lemma bot_coe : ((⊥ : submodule R M) : set M) = {0} := rfl
section
variables (R)
@[simp] lemma mem_bot : x ∈ (⊥ : submodule R M) ↔ x = 0 := mem_singleton_iff
end
lemma nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt {I : submodule R M} (bot_lt : ⊥ < I) : ∃ a : I, a ≠ 0 :=
begin
have h := (submodule.lt_iff_le_and_exists.1 bot_lt).2,
tidy,
end
instance : order_bot (submodule R M) :=
{ bot := ⊥,
bot_le := λ p x, by simp {contextual := tt},
..submodule.partial_order }
protected lemma eq_bot_iff (p : submodule R M) : p = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, x = (0 : M) :=
⟨ λ h, h.symm ▸ λ x hx, (mem_bot R).mp hx,
λ h, eq_bot_iff.mpr (λ x hx, (mem_bot R).mpr (h x hx)) ⟩
protected lemma ne_bot_iff (p : submodule R M) : p ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ x ∈ p, x ≠ (0 : M) :=
by { haveI := classical.prop_decidable, simp_rw [ne.def, p.eq_bot_iff, not_forall] }
/-- The universal set is the top element of the lattice of submodules. -/
instance : has_top (submodule R M) :=
⟨{ carrier := univ, smul_mem' := λ _ _ _, trivial, .. (⊤ : add_submonoid M)}⟩
@[simp] lemma top_coe : ((⊤ : submodule R M) : set M) = univ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_top : x ∈ (⊤ : submodule R M) := trivial
lemma eq_bot_of_zero_eq_one (zero_eq_one : (0 : R) = 1) : p = ⊥ :=
by ext x; simp [semimodule.eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one x zero_eq_one]
instance : order_top (submodule R M) :=
{ top := ⊤,
le_top := λ p x _, trivial,
..submodule.partial_order }
instance : has_Inf (submodule R M) :=
⟨λ S, {
carrier := ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : set M),
zero_mem' := by simp,
add_mem' := by simp [add_mem] {contextual := tt},
smul_mem' := by simp [smul_mem] {contextual := tt} }⟩
private lemma Inf_le' {S : set (submodule R M)} {p} : p ∈ S → Inf S ≤ p :=
bInter_subset_of_mem
private lemma le_Inf' {S : set (submodule R M)} {p} : (∀p' ∈ S, p ≤ p') → p ≤ Inf S :=
subset_bInter
instance : has_inf (submodule R M) :=
⟨λ p p', {
carrier := p ∩ p',
zero_mem' := by simp,
add_mem' := by simp [add_mem] {contextual := tt},
smul_mem' := by simp [smul_mem] {contextual := tt} }⟩
instance : complete_lattice (submodule R M) :=
{ sup := λ a b, Inf {x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x},
le_sup_left := λ a b, le_Inf' $ λ x ⟨ha, hb⟩, ha,
le_sup_right := λ a b, le_Inf' $ λ x ⟨ha, hb⟩, hb,
sup_le := λ a b c h₁ h₂, Inf_le' ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
inf := (⊓),
le_inf := λ a b c, subset_inter,
inf_le_left := λ a b, inter_subset_left _ _,
inf_le_right := λ a b, inter_subset_right _ _,
Sup := λtt, Inf {t | ∀t'∈tt, t' ≤ t},
le_Sup := λ s p hs, le_Inf' $ λ p' hp', hp' _ hs,
Sup_le := λ s p hs, Inf_le' hs,
Inf := Inf,
le_Inf := λ s a, le_Inf',
Inf_le := λ s a, Inf_le',
..submodule.order_top,
..submodule.order_bot }
instance add_comm_monoid_submodule : add_comm_monoid (submodule R M) :=
{ add := (⊔),
add_assoc := λ _ _ _, sup_assoc,
zero := ⊥,
zero_add := λ _, bot_sup_eq,
add_zero := λ _, sup_bot_eq,
add_comm := λ _ _, sup_comm }
@[simp] lemma add_eq_sup (p q : submodule R M) : p + q = p ⊔ q := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_eq_bot : (0 : submodule R M) = ⊥ := rfl
lemma eq_top_iff' {p : submodule R M} : p = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ p :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨λ h x, @h x trivial, λ h x _, h x⟩
lemma bot_ne_top [nontrivial M] : (⊥ : submodule R M) ≠ ⊤ :=
λ h, let ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_ne (0 : M) in ha $ (mem_bot R).1 $ (eq_top_iff.1 h) trivial
@[simp] theorem inf_coe : (p ⊓ p' : set M) = p ∩ p' := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inf {p p' : submodule R M} :
x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem Inf_coe (P : set (submodule R M)) : (↑(Inf P) : set M) = ⋂ p ∈ P, ↑p := rfl
@[simp] theorem infi_coe {ι} (p : ι → submodule R M) :
(↑⨅ i, p i : set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) :=
by rw [infi, Inf_coe]; ext a; simp; exact
⟨λ h i, h _ i rfl, λ h i x e, e ▸ h _⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_Inf {S : set (submodule R M)} {x : M} : x ∈ Inf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
set.mem_bInter_iff
@[simp] theorem mem_infi {ι} (p : ι → submodule R M) :
x ∈ (⨅ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ p i :=
by rw [← mem_coe, infi_coe, mem_Inter]; refl
theorem disjoint_def {p p' : submodule R M} :
disjoint p p' ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, x ∈ p' → x = (0:M) :=
show (∀ x, x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' → x ∈ ({0} : set M)) ↔ _, by simp
theorem disjoint_def' {p p' : submodule R M} :
disjoint p p' ↔ ∀ (x ∈ p) (y ∈ p'), x = y → x = (0:M) :=
disjoint_def.trans ⟨λ h x hx y hy hxy, h x hx $ hxy.symm ▸ hy,
λ h x hx hx', h _ hx x hx' rfl⟩
theorem mem_right_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint {p p' : submodule R M} (h : disjoint p p') {x : p} :
(x:M) ∈ p' ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ hx, coe_eq_zero.1 $ disjoint_def.1 h x x.2 hx, λ h, h.symm ▸ p'.zero_mem⟩
theorem mem_left_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint {p p' : submodule R M} (h : disjoint p p') {x : p'} :
(x:M) ∈ p ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ hx, coe_eq_zero.1 $ disjoint_def.1 h x hx x.2, λ h, h.symm ▸ p.zero_mem⟩
/-- The pushforward of a submodule `p ⊆ M` by `f : M → M₂` -/
def map (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M) : submodule R M₂ :=
{ carrier := f '' p,
smul_mem' := by rintro a _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩; exact ⟨_, p.smul_mem _ hb, f.map_smul _ _⟩,
.. p.to_add_submonoid.map f.to_add_monoid_hom }
@[simp] lemma map_coe (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M) :
(map f p : set M₂) = f '' p := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_map {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} {x : M₂} :
x ∈ map f p ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ p ∧ f y = x := iff.rfl
theorem mem_map_of_mem {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} {r} (h : r ∈ p) : f r ∈ map f p :=
set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
@[simp] lemma map_id : map linear_map.id p = p :=
submodule.ext $ λ a, by simp
lemma map_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (p : submodule R M) :
map (g.comp f) p = map g (map f p) :=
submodule.coe_injective $ by simp [map_coe]; rw ← image_comp
lemma map_mono {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p p' : submodule R M} : p ≤ p' → map f p ≤ map f p' :=
image_subset _
@[simp] lemma map_zero : map (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂) p = ⊥ :=
have ∃ (x : M), x ∈ p := ⟨0, p.zero_mem⟩,
ext $ by simp [this, eq_comm]
/-- The pullback of a submodule `p ⊆ M₂` along `f : M → M₂` -/
def comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) : submodule R M :=
{ carrier := f ⁻¹' p,
smul_mem' := λ a x h, by simp [p.smul_mem _ h],
.. p.to_add_submonoid.comap f.to_add_monoid_hom }
@[simp] lemma comap_coe (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) :
(comap f p : set M) = f ⁻¹' p := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_comap {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M₂} :
x ∈ comap f p ↔ f x ∈ p := iff.rfl
lemma comap_id : comap linear_map.id p = p :=
submodule.coe_injective rfl
lemma comap_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (p : submodule R M₃) :
comap (g.comp f) p = comap f (comap g p) := rfl
lemma comap_mono {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {q q' : submodule R M₂} : q ≤ q' → comap f q ≤ comap f q' :=
preimage_mono
lemma map_le_iff_le_comap {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} {q : submodule R M₂} :
map f p ≤ q ↔ p ≤ comap f q := image_subset_iff
lemma gc_map_comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : galois_connection (map f) (comap f)
| p q := map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp] lemma map_bot (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
@[simp] lemma map_sup (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : map f (p ⊔ p') = map f p ⊔ map f p' :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
@[simp] lemma map_supr {ι : Sort*} (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : ι → submodule R M) :
map f (⨆i, p i) = (⨆i, map f (p i)) :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_supr
@[simp] lemma comap_top (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : comap f ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_inf (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : comap f (q ⊓ q') = comap f q ⊓ comap f q' := rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_infi {ι : Sort*} (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : ι → submodule R M₂) :
comap f (⨅i, p i) = (⨅i, comap f (p i)) :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_infi
@[simp] lemma comap_zero : comap (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂) q = ⊤ :=
ext $ by simp
lemma map_comap_le (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (q : submodule R M₂) : map f (comap f q) ≤ q :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
lemma le_comap_map (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M) : p ≤ comap f (map f p) :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
--TODO(Mario): is there a way to prove this from order properties?
lemma map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂}
{p : submodule R M} {p' : submodule R M₂} :
map f p ⊓ p' = map f (p ⊓ comap f p') :=
le_antisymm
(by rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h₁, rfl⟩, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩)
(le_inf (map_mono inf_le_left) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 inf_le_right))
lemma map_comap_subtype : map p.subtype (comap p.subtype p') = p ⊓ p' :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨by rintro ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩; exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩⟩
lemma eq_zero_of_bot_submodule : ∀(b : (⊥ : submodule R M)), b = 0
| ⟨b', hb⟩ := subtype.eq $ show b' = 0, from (mem_bot R).1 hb
section
variables (R)
/-- The span of a set `s ⊆ M` is the smallest submodule of M that contains `s`. -/
def span (s : set M) : submodule R M := Inf {p | s ⊆ p}
end
variables {s t : set M}
lemma mem_span : x ∈ span R s ↔ ∀ p : submodule R M, s ⊆ p → x ∈ p :=
mem_bInter_iff
lemma subset_span : s ⊆ span R s :=
λ x h, mem_span.2 $ λ p hp, hp h
lemma span_le {p} : span R s ≤ p ↔ s ⊆ p :=
⟨subset.trans subset_span, λ ss x h, mem_span.1 h _ ss⟩
lemma span_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : span R s ≤ span R t :=
span_le.2 $ subset.trans h subset_span
lemma span_eq_of_le (h₁ : s ⊆ p) (h₂ : p ≤ span R s) : span R s = p :=
le_antisymm (span_le.2 h₁) h₂
@[simp] lemma span_eq : span R (p : set M) = p :=
span_eq_of_le _ (subset.refl _) subset_span
lemma map_span (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (s : set M) :
(span R s).map f = span R (f '' s) :=
eq.symm $ span_eq_of_le _ (set.image_subset f subset_span) $
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ span_le.2 $ λ x hx, subset_span ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
/-- An induction principle for span membership. If `p` holds for 0 and all elements of `s`, and is
preserved under addition and scalar multiplication, then `p` holds for all elements of the span of
`s`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma span_induction {p : M → Prop} (h : x ∈ span R s)
(Hs : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) (H0 : p 0)
(H1 : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(H2 : ∀ (a:R) x, p x → p (a • x)) : p x :=
(@span_le _ _ _ _ _ _ ⟨p, H0, H1, H2⟩).2 Hs h
section
variables (R M)
/-- `span` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion from submodule to set. -/
protected def gi : galois_insertion (@span R M _ _ _) coe :=
{ choice := λ s _, span R s,
gc := λ s t, span_le,
le_l_u := λ s, subset_span,
choice_eq := λ s h, rfl }
end
@[simp] lemma span_empty : span R (∅ : set M) = ⊥ :=
(submodule.gi R M).gc.l_bot
@[simp] lemma span_univ : span R (univ : set M) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 $ le_def.2 $ subset_span
lemma span_union (s t : set M) : span R (s ∪ t) = span R s ⊔ span R t :=
(submodule.gi R M).gc.l_sup
lemma span_Union {ι} (s : ι → set M) : span R (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, span R (s i) :=
(submodule.gi R M).gc.l_supr
@[simp] theorem coe_supr_of_directed {ι} [hι : nonempty ι]
(S : ι → submodule R M) (H : directed (≤) S) :
((supr S : submodule R M) : set M) = ⋃ i, S i :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm _ (Union_subset $ le_supr S),
suffices : (span R (⋃ i, (S i : set M)) : set M) ⊆ ⋃ (i : ι), ↑(S i),
by simpa only [span_Union, span_eq] using this,
refine (λ x hx, span_induction hx (λ _, id) _ _ _);
simp only [mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib],
{ exact hι.elim (λ i, ⟨i, (S i).zero_mem⟩) },
{ intros x y i hi j hj,
rcases H i j with ⟨k, ik, jk⟩,
exact ⟨k, add_mem _ (ik hi) (jk hj)⟩ },
{ exact λ a x i hi, ⟨i, smul_mem _ a hi⟩ },
end
lemma mem_sup_left {S T : submodule R M} : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show S ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_left
lemma mem_sup_right {S T : submodule R M} : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show T ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_right
lemma mem_supr_of_mem {ι : Sort*} {b : M} {p : ι → submodule R M} (i : ι) (h : b ∈ p i) :
b ∈ (⨆i, p i) :=
have p i ≤ (⨆i, p i) := le_supr p i,
@this b h
lemma mem_Sup_of_mem {S : set (submodule R M)} {s : submodule R M}
(hs : s ∈ S) : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ s → x ∈ Sup S :=
show s ≤ Sup S, from le_Sup hs
@[simp] theorem mem_supr_of_directed {ι} [nonempty ι]
(S : ι → submodule R M) (H : directed (≤) S) {x} :
x ∈ supr S ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ S i :=
by { rw [← mem_coe, coe_supr_of_directed S H, mem_Union], refl }
theorem mem_Sup_of_directed {s : set (submodule R M)}
{z} (hs : s.nonempty) (hdir : directed_on (≤) s) :
z ∈ Sup s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, z ∈ y :=
begin
haveI : nonempty s := hs.to_subtype,
simp only [Sup_eq_supr', mem_supr_of_directed _ hdir.directed_coe, set_coe.exists, subtype.coe_mk]
end
section
variables {p p'}
lemma mem_sup : x ∈ p ⊔ p' ↔ ∃ (y ∈ p) (z ∈ p'), y + z = x :=
⟨λ h, begin
rw [← span_eq p, ← span_eq p', ← span_union] at h,
apply span_induction h,
{ rintro y (h | h),
{ exact ⟨y, h, 0, by simp, by simp⟩ },
{ exact ⟨0, by simp, y, h, by simp⟩ } },
{ exact ⟨0, by simp, 0, by simp⟩ },
{ rintro _ _ ⟨y₁, hy₁, z₁, hz₁, rfl⟩ ⟨y₂, hy₂, z₂, hz₂, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, add_mem _ hy₁ hy₂, _, add_mem _ hz₁ hz₂, by simp [add_assoc]; cc⟩ },
{ rintro a _ ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, smul_mem _ a hy, _, smul_mem _ a hz, by simp [smul_add]⟩ }
end,
by rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩; exact add_mem _
((le_sup_left : p ≤ p ⊔ p') hy)
((le_sup_right : p' ≤ p ⊔ p') hz)⟩
lemma mem_sup' : x ∈ p ⊔ p' ↔ ∃ (y : p) (z : p'), (y:M) + z = x :=
mem_sup.trans $ by simp only [submodule.exists, coe_mk]
end
notation R`∙`:1000 x := span R (@singleton _ _ set.has_singleton x)
lemma mem_span_singleton_self (x : M) : x ∈ R ∙ x := subset_span rfl
lemma nontrivial_span_singleton {x : M} (h : x ≠ 0) : nontrivial (R ∙ x) :=
⟨begin
use [0, x, submodule.mem_span_singleton_self x],
intros H,
rw [eq_comm, submodule.mk_eq_zero] at H,
exact h H
end⟩
lemma mem_span_singleton {y : M} : x ∈ (R ∙ y) ↔ ∃ a:R, a • y = x :=
⟨λ h, begin
apply span_induction h,
{ rintro y (rfl|⟨⟨⟩⟩), exact ⟨1, by simp⟩ },
{ exact ⟨0, by simp⟩ },
{ rintro _ _ ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨a + b, by simp [add_smul]⟩ },
{ rintro a _ ⟨b, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨a * b, by simp [smul_smul]⟩ }
end,
by rintro ⟨a, y, rfl⟩; exact
smul_mem _ _ (subset_span $ by simp)⟩
lemma le_span_singleton_iff {s : submodule R M} {v₀ : M} :
s ≤ (R ∙ v₀) ↔ ∀ v ∈ s, ∃ r : R, r • v₀ = v :=
by simp_rw [le_def', mem_span_singleton]
lemma span_singleton_eq_range (y : M) : ↑(R ∙ y) = range ((• y) : R → M) :=
set.ext $ λ x, mem_span_singleton
lemma span_singleton_smul_le (r : R) (x : M) : (R ∙ (r • x)) ≤ R ∙ x :=
begin
rw [span_le, set.singleton_subset_iff, mem_coe],
exact smul_mem _ _ (mem_span_singleton_self _)
end
lemma span_singleton_smul_eq {K E : Type*} [division_ring K] [add_comm_group E] [module K E]
{r : K} (x : E) (hr : r ≠ 0) : (K ∙ (r • x)) = K ∙ x :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (span_singleton_smul_le r x) _,
convert span_singleton_smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x),
exact (inv_smul_smul' hr _).symm
end
lemma disjoint_span_singleton {K E : Type*} [division_ring K] [add_comm_group E] [module K E]
{s : submodule K E} {x : E} :
disjoint s (K ∙ x) ↔ (x ∈ s → x = 0) :=
begin
refine disjoint_def.trans ⟨λ H hx, H x hx $ subset_span $ mem_singleton x, _⟩,
assume H y hy hyx,
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hyx,
subst y,
classical, by_cases hc : c = 0, by simp only [hc, zero_smul],
rw [s.smul_mem_iff hc] at hy,
rw [H hy, smul_zero]
end
lemma disjoint_span_singleton' {K E : Type*} [division_ring K] [add_comm_group E] [module K E]
{p : submodule K E} {x : E} (x0 : x ≠ 0) :
disjoint p (K ∙ x) ↔ x ∉ p :=
disjoint_span_singleton.trans ⟨λ h₁ h₂, x0 (h₁ h₂), λ h₁ h₂, (h₁ h₂).elim⟩
lemma mem_span_insert {y} : x ∈ span R (insert y s) ↔ ∃ (a:R) (z ∈ span R s), x = a • y + z :=
begin
simp only [← union_singleton, span_union, mem_sup, mem_span_singleton, exists_prop,
exists_exists_eq_and],
rw [exists_comm],
simp only [eq_comm, add_comm, exists_and_distrib_left]
end
lemma span_insert_eq_span (h : x ∈ span R s) : span R (insert x s) = span R s :=
span_eq_of_le _ (set.insert_subset.mpr ⟨h, subset_span⟩) (span_mono $ subset_insert _ _)
lemma span_span : span R (span R s : set M) = span R s := span_eq _
lemma span_eq_bot : span R (s : set M) = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, (x:M) = 0 :=
eq_bot_iff.trans ⟨
λ H x h, (mem_bot R).1 $ H $ subset_span h,
λ H, span_le.2 (λ x h, (mem_bot R).2 $ H x h)⟩
@[simp] lemma span_singleton_eq_bot : (R ∙ x) = ⊥ ↔ x = 0 :=
span_eq_bot.trans $ by simp
@[simp] lemma span_zero : span R (0 : set M) = ⊥ := by rw [←singleton_zero, span_singleton_eq_bot]
@[simp] lemma span_image (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : span R (f '' s) = map f (span R s) :=
span_eq_of_le _ (image_subset _ subset_span) $ map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $
span_le.2 $ image_subset_iff.1 subset_span
lemma supr_eq_span {ι : Sort w} (p : ι → submodule R M) :
(⨆ (i : ι), p i) = submodule.span R (⋃ (i : ι), ↑(p i)) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume i, subset.trans (assume m hm, set.mem_Union.mpr ⟨i, hm⟩) subset_span)
(span_le.mpr $ Union_subset_iff.mpr $ assume i m hm, mem_supr_of_mem i hm)
lemma span_singleton_le_iff_mem (m : M) (p : submodule R M) : (R ∙ m) ≤ p ↔ m ∈ p :=
by rw [span_le, singleton_subset_iff, mem_coe]
lemma lt_add_iff_not_mem {I : submodule R M} {a : M} : I < I + (R ∙ a) ↔ a ∉ I :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
by_contra akey,
have h1 : I + (R ∙ a) ≤ I,
{ simp only [add_eq_sup, sup_le_iff],
split,
{ exact le_refl I, },
{ exact (span_singleton_le_iff_mem a I).mpr akey, } },
have h2 := gt_of_ge_of_gt h1 h,
exact lt_irrefl I h2, },
{ intro h,
apply lt_iff_le_and_exists.mpr, split,
simp only [add_eq_sup, le_sup_left],
use a,
split, swap, { assumption, },
{ have : (R ∙ a) ≤ I + (R ∙ a) := le_sup_right,
exact this (mem_span_singleton_self a), } },
end
lemma mem_supr {ι : Sort w} (p : ι → submodule R M) {m : M} :
(m ∈ ⨆ i, p i) ↔ (∀ N, (∀ i, p i ≤ N) → m ∈ N) :=
begin
rw [← span_singleton_le_iff_mem, le_supr_iff],
simp only [span_singleton_le_iff_mem],
end
/-- The product of two submodules is a submodule. -/
def prod : submodule R (M × M₂) :=
{ carrier := set.prod p q,
smul_mem' := by rintro a ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩; exact ⟨smul_mem _ a hx, smul_mem _ a hy⟩,
.. p.to_add_submonoid.prod q.to_add_submonoid }
@[simp] lemma prod_coe :
(prod p q : set (M × M₂)) = set.prod p q := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_prod {p : submodule R M} {q : submodule R M₂} {x : M × M₂} :
x ∈ prod p q ↔ x.1 ∈ p ∧ x.2 ∈ q := set.mem_prod
lemma span_prod_le (s : set M) (t : set M₂) :
span R (set.prod s t) ≤ prod (span R s) (span R t) :=
span_le.2 $ set.prod_mono subset_span subset_span
@[simp] lemma prod_top : (prod ⊤ ⊤ : submodule R (M × M₂)) = ⊤ :=
by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma prod_bot : (prod ⊥ ⊥ : submodule R (M × M₂)) = ⊥ :=
by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp [prod.zero_eq_mk]
lemma prod_mono {p p' : submodule R M} {q q' : submodule R M₂} :
p ≤ p' → q ≤ q' → prod p q ≤ prod p' q' := prod_mono
@[simp] lemma prod_inf_prod : prod p q ⊓ prod p' q' = prod (p ⊓ p') (q ⊓ q') :=
coe_injective set.prod_inter_prod
@[simp] lemma prod_sup_prod : prod p q ⊔ prod p' q' = prod (p ⊔ p') (q ⊔ q') :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (sup_le
(prod_mono le_sup_left le_sup_left)
(prod_mono le_sup_right le_sup_right)) _,
simp [le_def'], intros xx yy hxx hyy,
rcases mem_sup.1 hxx with ⟨x, hx, x', hx', rfl⟩,
rcases mem_sup.1 hyy with ⟨y, hy, y', hy', rfl⟩,
refine mem_sup.2 ⟨(x, y), ⟨hx, hy⟩, (x', y'), ⟨hx', hy'⟩, rfl⟩
end
end add_comm_monoid
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
variables (p p' : submodule R M) (q q' : submodule R M₂)
variables {r : R} {x y : M}
open set
@[simp] lemma neg_coe : -(p : set M) = p := set.ext $ λ x, p.neg_mem_iff
@[simp] protected lemma map_neg (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : map (-f) p = map f p :=
ext $ λ y, ⟨λ ⟨x, hx, hy⟩, hy ▸ ⟨-x, neg_mem _ hx, f.map_neg x⟩,
λ ⟨x, hx, hy⟩, hy ▸ ⟨-x, neg_mem _ hx, ((-f).map_neg _).trans (neg_neg (f x))⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma span_neg (s : set M) : span R (-s) = span R s :=
calc span R (-s) = span R ((-linear_map.id : M →ₗ[R] M) '' s) : by simp
... = map (-linear_map.id) (span R s) : (map_span _ _).symm
... = span R s : by simp
lemma mem_span_insert' {y} {s : set M} : x ∈ span R (insert y s) ↔ ∃(a:R), x + a • y ∈ span R s :=
begin
rw mem_span_insert, split,
{ rintro ⟨a, z, hz, rfl⟩, exact ⟨-a, by simp [hz, add_assoc]⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨a, h⟩, exact ⟨-a, _, h, by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]⟩ }
end
-- TODO(Mario): Factor through add_subgroup
/-- The equivalence relation associated to a submodule `p`, defined by `x ≈ y` iff `y - x ∈ p`. -/
def quotient_rel : setoid M :=
⟨λ x y, x - y ∈ p, λ x, by simp,
λ x y h, by simpa using neg_mem _ h,
λ x y z h₁ h₂, by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_comm, add_assoc] using add_mem _ h₁ h₂⟩
/-- The quotient of a module `M` by a submodule `p ⊆ M`. -/
def quotient : Type* := quotient (quotient_rel p)
namespace quotient
/-- Map associating to an element of `M` the corresponding element of `M/p`,
when `p` is a submodule of `M`. -/
def mk {p : submodule R M} : M → quotient p := quotient.mk'
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_mk {p : submodule R M} (x : M) : (quotient.mk x : quotient p) = mk x := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk'_eq_mk {p : submodule R M} (x : M) : (quotient.mk' x : quotient p) = mk x := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_mk_eq_mk {p : submodule R M} (x : M) : (quot.mk _ x : quotient p) = mk x := rfl
protected theorem eq {x y : M} : (mk x : quotient p) = mk y ↔ x - y ∈ p := quotient.eq'
instance : has_zero (quotient p) := ⟨mk 0⟩
instance : inhabited (quotient p) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_zero : mk 0 = (0 : quotient p) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_zero : (mk x : quotient p) = 0 ↔ x ∈ p :=
by simpa using (quotient.eq p : mk x = 0 ↔ _)
instance : has_add (quotient p) :=
⟨λ a b, quotient.lift_on₂' a b (λ a b, mk (a + b)) $
λ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ h₁ h₂, (quotient.eq p).2 $
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_comm, add_comm] using add_mem p h₁ h₂⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_add : (mk (x + y) : quotient p) = mk x + mk y := rfl
instance : has_neg (quotient p) :=
⟨λ a, quotient.lift_on' a (λ a, mk (-a)) $
λ a b h, (quotient.eq p).2 $ by simpa using neg_mem p h⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_neg : (mk (-x) : quotient p) = -mk x := rfl
instance : has_sub (quotient p) :=
⟨λ a b, quotient.lift_on₂' a b (λ a b, mk (a - b)) $
λ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ h₁ h₂, (quotient.eq p).2 $
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_comm, add_comm] using add_mem p h₁ (neg_mem p h₂)⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_sub : (mk (x - y) : quotient p) = mk x - mk y := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (quotient p) :=
by refine {zero := 0, add := (+), neg := has_neg.neg, sub := has_sub.sub, sub_eq_add_neg := _, ..};
repeat {rintro ⟨⟩};
simp [-mk_zero, ← mk_zero p, -mk_add, ← mk_add p, -mk_neg, ← mk_neg p, -mk_sub,
← mk_sub p, sub_eq_add_neg];
cc
instance : has_scalar R (quotient p) :=
⟨λ a x, quotient.lift_on' x (λ x, mk (a • x)) $
λ x y h, (quotient.eq p).2 $ by simpa [smul_sub] using smul_mem p a h⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_smul : (mk (r • x) : quotient p) = r • mk x := rfl
instance : semimodule R (quotient p) :=
semimodule.of_core $ by refine {smul := (•), ..};
repeat {rintro ⟨⟩ <|> intro}; simp [smul_add, add_smul, smul_smul,
-mk_add, (mk_add p).symm, -mk_smul, (mk_smul p).symm]
lemma mk_surjective : function.surjective (@mk _ _ _ _ _ p) :=
by { rintros ⟨x⟩, exact ⟨x, rfl⟩ }
lemma nontrivial_of_lt_top (h : p < ⊤) : nontrivial (p.quotient) :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, _, not_mem_s⟩ := exists_of_lt h,
refine ⟨⟨mk x, 0, _⟩⟩,
simpa using not_mem_s
end
end quotient
lemma quot_hom_ext ⦃f g : quotient p →ₗ[R] M₂⦄ (h : ∀ x, f (quotient.mk x) = g (quotient.mk x)) :
f = g :=
linear_map.ext $ λ x, quotient.induction_on' x h
end submodule
namespace submodule
variables [field K]
variables [add_comm_group V] [vector_space K V]
variables [add_comm_group V₂] [vector_space K V₂]
lemma comap_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : submodule K V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) :
p.comap (a • f) = p.comap f :=
by ext b; simp only [submodule.mem_comap, p.smul_mem_iff h, linear_map.smul_apply]
lemma map_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : submodule K V) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) :
p.map (a • f) = p.map f :=
le_antisymm
begin rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_smul f _ a h, ← map_le_iff_le_comap], exact le_refl _ end
begin rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, ← comap_smul f _ a h, ← map_le_iff_le_comap], exact le_refl _ end
lemma comap_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : submodule K V₂) (a : K) :
p.comap (a • f) = (⨅ h : a ≠ 0, p.comap f) :=
by classical; by_cases a = 0; simp [h, comap_smul]
lemma map_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : submodule K V) (a : K) :
p.map (a • f) = (⨆ h : a ≠ 0, p.map f) :=
by classical; by_cases a = 0; simp [h, map_smul]
end submodule
/-! ### Properties of linear maps -/
namespace linear_map
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
include R
open submodule
/-- If two linear maps are equal on a set `s`, then they are equal on `submodule.span s`.
See also `linear_map.eq_on_span'` for a version using `set.eq_on`. -/
lemma eq_on_span {s : set M} {f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (H : set.eq_on f g s) ⦃x⦄ (h : x ∈ span R s) :
f x = g x :=
by apply span_induction h H; simp {contextual := tt}
/-- If two linear maps are equal on a set `s`, then they are equal on `submodule.span s`.
This version uses `set.eq_on`, and the hidden argument will expand to `h : x ∈ (span R s : set M)`.
See `linear_map.eq_on_span` for a version that takes `h : x ∈ span R s` as an argument. -/
lemma eq_on_span' {s : set M} {f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (H : set.eq_on f g s) :
set.eq_on f g (span R s : set M) :=
eq_on_span H
/-- If `s` generates the whole semimodule and linear maps `f`, `g` are equal on `s`, then they are
equal. -/
lemma ext_on {s : set M} {f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hv : span R s = ⊤) (h : set.eq_on f g s) :
f = g :=
linear_map.ext (λ x, eq_on_span h (eq_top_iff'.1 hv _))
/-- If the range of `v : ι → M` generates the whole semimodule and linear maps `f`, `g` are equal at
each `v i`, then they are equal. -/
lemma ext_on_range {v : ι → M} {f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hv : span R (set.range v) = ⊤)
(h : ∀i, f (v i) = g (v i)) : f = g :=
ext_on hv (set.forall_range_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma finsupp_sum {γ} [has_zero γ]
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) {t : ι →₀ γ} {g : ι → γ → M} :
f (t.sum g) = t.sum (λi d, f (g i d)) := f.map_sum
theorem map_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (h p') :
submodule.map (cod_restrict p f h) p' = comap p.subtype (p'.map f) :=
submodule.ext $ λ ⟨x, hx⟩, by simp [subtype.ext_iff_val]
theorem comap_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (hf p') :
submodule.comap (cod_restrict p f hf) p' = submodule.comap f (map p.subtype p') :=
submodule.ext $ λ x, ⟨λ h, ⟨⟨_, hf x⟩, h, rfl⟩, by rintro ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩; exact h⟩
/-- The range of a linear map `f : M → M₂` is a submodule of `M₂`. -/
def range (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : submodule R M₂ := map f ⊤
theorem range_coe (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : (range f : set M₂) = set.range f := set.image_univ
@[simp] theorem mem_range {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} : ∀ {x}, x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x :=
set.ext_iff.1 (range_coe f)
theorem mem_range_self (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (x : M) : f x ∈ f.range := mem_range.2 ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem range_id : range (linear_map.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊤ := map_id _
theorem range_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : range (g.comp f) = map g (range f) :=
map_comp _ _ _
theorem range_comp_le_range (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : range (g.comp f) ≤ range g :=
by rw range_comp; exact map_mono le_top
theorem range_eq_top {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} : range f = ⊤ ↔ surjective f :=
by rw [submodule.ext'_iff, range_coe, top_coe, set.range_iff_surjective]
lemma range_le_iff_comap {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M₂} : range f ≤ p ↔ comap f p = ⊤ :=
by rw [range, map_le_iff_le_comap, eq_top_iff]
lemma map_le_range {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} : map f p ≤ range f :=
map_mono le_top
lemma range_coprod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(f.coprod g).range = f.range ⊔ g.range :=
submodule.ext $ λ x, by simp [mem_sup]
lemma is_compl_range_inl_inr : is_compl (inl R M M₂).range (inr R M M₂).range :=
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨⟨x, -, hx⟩, ⟨y, -, hy⟩⟩,
simp only [prod.ext_iff, inl_apply, inr_apply, mem_bot] at hx hy ⊢,
exact ⟨hy.1.symm, hx.2.symm⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨x, y⟩ -,
simp only [mem_sup, mem_range, exists_prop],
refine ⟨(x, 0), ⟨x, rfl⟩, (0, y), ⟨y, rfl⟩, _⟩,
simp }
end
lemma sup_range_inl_inr : (inl R M M₂).range ⊔ (inr R M M₂).range = ⊤ :=
is_compl_range_inl_inr.sup_eq_top
/-- Restrict the codomain of a linear map `f` to `f.range`. -/
@[reducible] def range_restrict (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] f.range :=
f.cod_restrict f.range f.mem_range_self
section
variables (R) (M)
/-- Given an element `x` of a module `M` over `R`, the natural map from
`R` to scalar multiples of `x`.-/
def to_span_singleton (x : M) : R →ₗ[R] M := linear_map.id.smul_right x
/-- The range of `to_span_singleton x` is the span of `x`.-/
lemma span_singleton_eq_range (x : M) : (R ∙ x) = (to_span_singleton R M x).range :=
submodule.ext $ λ y, by {refine iff.trans _ mem_range.symm, exact mem_span_singleton }
lemma to_span_singleton_one (x : M) : to_span_singleton R M x 1 = x := one_smul _ _
end
/-- The kernel of a linear map `f : M → M₂` is defined to be `comap f ⊥`. This is equivalent to the
set of `x : M` such that `f x = 0`. The kernel is a submodule of `M`. -/
def ker (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : submodule R M := comap f ⊥
@[simp] theorem mem_ker {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {y} : y ∈ ker f ↔ f y = 0 := mem_bot R
@[simp] theorem ker_id : ker (linear_map.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_coe_ker (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (x : ker f) : f x = 0 := mem_ker.1 x.2
lemma comp_ker_subtype (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : f.comp f.ker.subtype = 0 :=
linear_map.ext $ λ x, suffices f x = 0, by simp [this], mem_ker.1 x.2
theorem ker_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : ker (g.comp f) = comap f (ker g) := rfl
theorem ker_le_ker_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : ker f ≤ ker (g.comp f) :=
by rw ker_comp; exact comap_mono bot_le
theorem disjoint_ker {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} :
disjoint p (ker f) ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, f x = 0 → x = 0 :=
by simp [disjoint_def]
lemma disjoint_inl_inr : disjoint (inl R M M₂).range (inr R M M₂).range :=
by simp [disjoint_def, @eq_comm M 0, @eq_comm M₂ 0] {contextual := tt}; intros; refl
theorem ker_eq_bot' {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} :
ker f = ⊥ ↔ (∀ m, f m = 0 → m = 0) :=
by simpa [disjoint] using @disjoint_ker _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f ⊤
lemma le_ker_iff_map {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} : p ≤ ker f ↔ map f p = ⊥ :=
by rw [ker, eq_bot_iff, map_le_iff_le_comap]
lemma ker_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (hf) :
ker (cod_restrict p f hf) = ker f :=
by rw [ker, comap_cod_restrict, map_bot]; refl
lemma range_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (hf) :
range (cod_restrict p f hf) = comap p.subtype f.range :=
map_cod_restrict _ _ _ _
lemma ker_restrict {p : submodule R M} {f : M →ₗ[R] M} (hf : ∀ x : M, x ∈ p → f x ∈ p) :
ker (f.restrict hf) = (f.dom_restrict p).ker :=
by rw [restrict_eq_cod_restrict_dom_restrict, ker_cod_restrict]
lemma map_comap_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (q : submodule R M₂) :
map f (comap f q) = range f ⊓ q :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (map_mono le_top) (map_comap_le _ _)) $
by rintro _ ⟨⟨x, _, rfl⟩, hx⟩; exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
lemma map_comap_eq_self {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {q : submodule R M₂} (h : q ≤ range f) :
map f (comap f q) = q :=
by rwa [map_comap_eq, inf_eq_right]
@[simp] theorem ker_zero : ker (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff'.2 $ λ x, by simp
@[simp] theorem range_zero : range (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = ⊥ :=
submodule.map_zero _
theorem ker_eq_top {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} : ker f = ⊤ ↔ f = 0 :=
⟨λ h, ext $ λ x, mem_ker.1 $ h.symm ▸ trivial, λ h, h.symm ▸ ker_zero⟩
lemma range_le_bot_iff (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : range f ≤ ⊥ ↔ f = 0 :=
by rw [range_le_iff_comap]; exact ker_eq_top
theorem range_eq_bot {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} : range f = ⊥ ↔ f = 0 :=
by rw [← range_le_bot_iff, le_bot_iff]
lemma range_le_ker_iff {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃} : range f ≤ ker g ↔ g.comp f = 0 :=
⟨λ h, ker_eq_top.1 $ eq_top_iff'.2 $ λ x, h $ mem_map_of_mem trivial,
λ h x hx, mem_ker.2 $ exists.elim hx $ λ y ⟨_, hy⟩, by rw [←hy, ←comp_apply, h, zero_apply]⟩
theorem comap_le_comap_iff {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hf : range f = ⊤) {p p'} :
comap f p ≤ comap f p' ↔ p ≤ p' :=
⟨λ H x hx, by rcases range_eq_top.1 hf x with ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩; exact H hx, comap_mono⟩
theorem comap_injective {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hf : range f = ⊤) : injective (comap f) :=
λ p p' h, le_antisymm ((comap_le_comap_iff hf).1 (le_of_eq h))
((comap_le_comap_iff hf).1 (ge_of_eq h))
theorem map_coprod_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)
(p : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂) :
map (coprod f g) (p.prod q) = map f p ⊔ map g q :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 _) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 _)),
{ rw le_def', rintro _ ⟨x, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩,
exact mem_sup.2 ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, rfl⟩, _, ⟨_, h₂, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ },
{ exact λ x hx, ⟨(x, 0), by simp [hx]⟩ },
{ exact λ x hx, ⟨(0, x), by simp [hx]⟩ }
end
theorem comap_prod_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃)
(p : submodule R M₂) (q : submodule R M₃) :
comap (prod f g) (p.prod q) = comap f p ⊓ comap g q :=
submodule.ext $ λ x, iff.rfl
theorem prod_eq_inf_comap (p : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂) :
p.prod q = p.comap (linear_map.fst R M M₂) ⊓ q.comap (linear_map.snd R M M₂) :=
submodule.ext $ λ x, iff.rfl
theorem prod_eq_sup_map (p : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂) :
p.prod q = p.map (linear_map.inl R M M₂) ⊔ q.map (linear_map.inr R M M₂) :=
by rw [← map_coprod_prod, coprod_inl_inr, map_id]
lemma span_inl_union_inr {s : set M} {t : set M₂} :
span R (inl R M M₂ '' s ∪ inr R M M₂ '' t) = (span R s).prod (span R t) :=
by rw [span_union, prod_eq_sup_map, ← span_image, ← span_image]; refl
@[simp] lemma ker_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
ker (prod f g) = ker f ⊓ ker g :=
by rw [ker, ← prod_bot, comap_prod_prod]; refl
lemma range_prod_le (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
range (prod f g) ≤ (range f).prod (range g) :=
begin
simp only [le_def', prod_apply, mem_range, mem_coe, mem_prod, exists_imp_distrib],
rintro _ x rfl,
exact ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
end
theorem ker_eq_bot_of_injective {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hf : injective f) : ker f = ⊥ :=
begin
have : disjoint ⊤ f.ker, by { rw [disjoint_ker, ← map_zero f], exact λ x hx H, hf H },
simpa [disjoint]
end
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
include R
open submodule
lemma comap_map_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M) :
comap f (map f p) = p ⊔ ker f :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (sup_le (le_comap_map _ _) (comap_mono bot_le)),
rintro x ⟨y, hy, e⟩,
exact mem_sup.2 ⟨y, hy, x - y, by simpa using sub_eq_zero.2 e.symm, by simp⟩
end
lemma comap_map_eq_self {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} (h : ker f ≤ p) :
comap f (map f p) = p :=
by rw [comap_map_eq, sup_of_le_left h]
theorem map_le_map_iff (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) {p p'} : map f p ≤ map f p' ↔ p ≤ p' ⊔ ker f :=
by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map_eq]
theorem map_le_map_iff' {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hf : ker f = ⊥) {p p'} : map f p ≤ map f p' ↔ p ≤ p' :=
by rw [map_le_map_iff, hf, sup_bot_eq]
theorem map_injective {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hf : ker f = ⊥) : injective (map f) :=
λ p p' h, le_antisymm ((map_le_map_iff' hf).1 (le_of_eq h)) ((map_le_map_iff' hf).1 (ge_of_eq h))
theorem map_eq_top_iff {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hf : range f = ⊤) {p : submodule R M} :
p.map f = ⊤ ↔ p ⊔ f.ker = ⊤ :=
by simp_rw [← top_le_iff, ← hf, range, map_le_map_iff]
end add_comm_group
section ring
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
include R
open submodule
theorem sub_mem_ker_iff {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {x y} : x - y ∈ f.ker ↔ f x = f y :=
by rw [mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero]
theorem disjoint_ker' {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} :
disjoint p (ker f) ↔ ∀ x y ∈ p, f x = f y → x = y :=
disjoint_ker.trans
⟨λ H x y hx hy h, eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ H _ (sub_mem _ hx hy) (by simp [h]),
λ H x h₁ h₂, H x 0 h₁ (zero_mem _) (by simpa using h₂)⟩
theorem inj_of_disjoint_ker {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M}
{s : set M} (h : s ⊆ p) (hd : disjoint p (ker f)) :
∀ x y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y :=
λ x y hx hy, disjoint_ker'.1 hd _ _ (h hx) (h hy)
theorem ker_eq_bot {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} : ker f = ⊥ ↔ injective f :=
by simpa [disjoint] using @disjoint_ker' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f ⊤
/-- If the union of the kernels `ker f` and `ker g` spans the domain, then the range of
`prod f g` is equal to the product of `range f` and `range g`. -/
lemma range_prod_eq {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {g : M →ₗ[R] M₃} (h : ker f ⊔ ker g = ⊤) :
range (prod f g) = (range f).prod (range g) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (f.range_prod_le g) _,
simp only [le_def', prod_apply, mem_range, mem_coe, mem_prod, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp,
prod.forall],
rintros _ _ x rfl y rfl,
simp only [prod.mk.inj_iff, ← sub_mem_ker_iff],
have : y - x ∈ ker f ⊔ ker g, { simp only [h, mem_top] },
rcases mem_sup.1 this with ⟨x', hx', y', hy', H⟩,
refine ⟨x' + x, _, _⟩,
{ rwa add_sub_cancel },
{ rwa [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq.1 H, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub, ← neg_mem_iff, neg_sub,
add_sub_cancel'] }
end
end ring
section field
variables [field K]
variables [add_comm_group V] [vector_space K V]
variables [add_comm_group V₂] [vector_space K V₂]
lemma ker_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) : ker (a • f) = ker f :=
submodule.comap_smul f _ a h
lemma ker_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) : ker (a • f) = ⨅(h : a ≠ 0), ker f :=
submodule.comap_smul' f _ a
lemma range_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) : range (a • f) = range f :=
submodule.map_smul f _ a h
lemma range_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) : range (a • f) = ⨆(h : a ≠ 0), range f :=
submodule.map_smul' f _ a
end field
end linear_map
lemma submodule.sup_eq_range [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
(p q : submodule R M) : p ⊔ q = (p.subtype.coprod q.subtype).range :=
submodule.ext $ λ x, by simp [submodule.mem_sup, submodule.exists]
namespace is_linear_map
lemma is_linear_map_add [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] :
is_linear_map R (λ (x : M × M), x.1 + x.2) :=
begin
apply is_linear_map.mk,
{ intros x y,
simp, cc },
{ intros x y,
simp [smul_add] }
end
lemma is_linear_map_sub {R M : Type*} [semiring R] [add_comm_group M] [semimodule R M]:
is_linear_map R (λ (x : M × M), x.1 - x.2) :=
begin
apply is_linear_map.mk,
{ intros x y,
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg] },
{ intros x y,
simp [smul_sub] }
end
end is_linear_map
namespace submodule
section add_comm_monoid
variables {T : semiring R} [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
variables (p p' : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂)
include T
open linear_map
@[simp] theorem map_top (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : map f ⊤ = range f := rfl
@[simp] theorem comap_bot (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : comap f ⊥ = ker f := rfl
@[simp] theorem ker_subtype : p.subtype.ker = ⊥ :=
ker_eq_bot_of_injective $ λ x y, subtype.ext_val
@[simp] theorem range_subtype : p.subtype.range = p :=
by simpa using map_comap_subtype p ⊤
lemma map_subtype_le (p' : submodule R p) : map p.subtype p' ≤ p :=
by simpa using (map_mono le_top : map p.subtype p' ≤ p.subtype.range)
/-- Under the canonical linear map from a submodule `p` to the ambient space `M`, the image of the
maximal submodule of `p` is just `p `. -/
@[simp] lemma map_subtype_top : map p.subtype (⊤ : submodule R p) = p :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma comap_subtype_eq_top {p p' : submodule R M} :
comap p.subtype p' = ⊤ ↔ p ≤ p' :=
eq_top_iff.trans $ map_le_iff_le_comap.symm.trans $ by rw [map_subtype_top]
@[simp] lemma comap_subtype_self : comap p.subtype p = ⊤ :=
comap_subtype_eq_top.2 (le_refl _)
@[simp] theorem ker_of_le (p p' : submodule R M) (h : p ≤ p') : (of_le h).ker = ⊥ :=
by rw [of_le, ker_cod_restrict, ker_subtype]
lemma range_of_le (p q : submodule R M) (h : p ≤ q) : (of_le h).range = comap q.subtype p :=
by rw [← map_top, of_le, linear_map.map_cod_restrict, map_top, range_subtype]
@[simp] theorem map_inl : p.map (inl R M M₂) = prod p ⊥ :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp only [and.left_comm, eq_comm, mem_map, prod.mk.inj_iff, inl_apply, mem_bot,
exists_eq_left', mem_prod] }
@[simp] theorem map_inr : q.map (inr R M M₂) = prod ⊥ q :=
by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp [and.left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem comap_fst : p.comap (fst R M M₂) = prod p ⊤ :=
by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
@[simp] theorem comap_snd : q.comap (snd R M M₂) = prod ⊤ q :=
by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
@[simp] theorem prod_comap_inl : (prod p q).comap (inl R M M₂) = p := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem prod_comap_inr : (prod p q).comap (inr R M M₂) = q := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem prod_map_fst : (prod p q).map (fst R M M₂) = p :=
by ext x; simp [(⟨0, zero_mem _⟩ : ∃ x, x ∈ q)]
@[simp] theorem prod_map_snd : (prod p q).map (snd R M M₂) = q :=
by ext x; simp [(⟨0, zero_mem _⟩ : ∃ x, x ∈ p)]
@[simp] theorem ker_inl : (inl R M M₂).ker = ⊥ :=
by rw [ker, ← prod_bot, prod_comap_inl]
@[simp] theorem ker_inr : (inr R M M₂).ker = ⊥ :=
by rw [ker, ← prod_bot, prod_comap_inr]
@[simp] theorem range_fst : (fst R M M₂).range = ⊤ :=
by rw [range, ← prod_top, prod_map_fst]
@[simp] theorem range_snd : (snd R M M₂).range = ⊤ :=
by rw [range, ← prod_top, prod_map_snd]
end add_comm_monoid
section ring
variables {T : ring R} [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
variables (p p' : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂)
include T
open linear_map
lemma disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot {p q : submodule R M} :
disjoint p q ↔ comap p.subtype q = ⊥ :=
by rw [eq_bot_iff, ← map_le_map_iff' p.ker_subtype, map_bot, map_comap_subtype, disjoint]
/-- If `N ⊆ M` then submodules of `N` are the same as submodules of `M` contained in `N` -/
def map_subtype.rel_iso :
submodule R p ≃o {p' : submodule R M // p' ≤ p} :=
{ to_fun := λ p', ⟨map p.subtype p', map_subtype_le p _⟩,
inv_fun := λ q, comap p.subtype q,
left_inv := λ p', comap_map_eq_self $ by simp,
right_inv := λ ⟨q, hq⟩, subtype.ext_val $ by simp [map_comap_subtype p, inf_of_le_right hq],
map_rel_iff' := λ p₁ p₂, (map_le_map_iff' (ker_subtype p)).symm }
/-- If `p ⊆ M` is a submodule, the ordering of submodules of `p` is embedded in the ordering of
submodules of `M`. -/
def map_subtype.order_embedding :
submodule R p ↪o submodule R M :=
(rel_iso.to_rel_embedding $ map_subtype.rel_iso p).trans (subtype.rel_embedding _ _)
@[simp] lemma map_subtype_embedding_eq (p' : submodule R p) :
map_subtype.order_embedding p p' = map p.subtype p' := rfl
/-- The map from a module `M` to the quotient of `M` by a submodule `p` as a linear map. -/
def mkq : M →ₗ[R] p.quotient := ⟨quotient.mk, by simp, by simp⟩
@[simp] theorem mkq_apply (x : M) : p.mkq x = quotient.mk x := rfl
/-- The map from the quotient of `M` by a submodule `p` to `M₂` induced by a linear map `f : M → M₂`
vanishing on `p`, as a linear map. -/
def liftq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h : p ≤ f.ker) : p.quotient →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
⟨λ x, _root_.quotient.lift_on' x f $
λ a b (ab : a - b ∈ p), eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ by simpa using h ab,
by rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩; exact f.map_add x y,
by rintro a ⟨x⟩; exact f.map_smul a x⟩
@[simp] theorem liftq_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) {h} (x : M) :
p.liftq f h (quotient.mk x) = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem liftq_mkq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) : (p.liftq f h).comp p.mkq = f :=
by ext; refl
@[simp] theorem range_mkq : p.mkq.range = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff'.2 $ by rintro ⟨x⟩; exact ⟨x, trivial, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem ker_mkq : p.mkq.ker = p :=
by ext; simp
lemma le_comap_mkq (p' : submodule R p.quotient) : p ≤ comap p.mkq p' :=
by simpa using (comap_mono bot_le : p.mkq.ker ≤ comap p.mkq p')
@[simp] theorem mkq_map_self : map p.mkq p = ⊥ :=
by rw [eq_bot_iff, map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_bot, ker_mkq]; exact le_refl _
@[simp] theorem comap_map_mkq : comap p.mkq (map p.mkq p') = p ⊔ p' :=
by simp [comap_map_eq, sup_comm]
@[simp] theorem map_mkq_eq_top : map p.mkq p' = ⊤ ↔ p ⊔ p' = ⊤ :=
by simp only [map_eq_top_iff p.range_mkq, sup_comm, ker_mkq]
/-- The map from the quotient of `M` by submodule `p` to the quotient of `M₂` by submodule `q` along
`f : M → M₂` is linear. -/
def mapq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h : p ≤ comap f q) : p.quotient →ₗ[R] q.quotient :=
p.liftq (q.mkq.comp f) $ by simpa [ker_comp] using h
@[simp] theorem mapq_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) {h} (x : M) :
mapq p q f h (quotient.mk x) = quotient.mk (f x) := rfl
theorem mapq_mkq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) {h} : (mapq p q f h).comp p.mkq = q.mkq.comp f :=
by ext x; refl
theorem comap_liftq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) :
q.comap (p.liftq f h) = (q.comap f).map (mkq p) :=
le_antisymm
(by rintro ⟨x⟩ hx; exact ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩)
(by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, ← comap_comp, liftq_mkq]; exact le_refl _)
theorem map_liftq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) (q : submodule R (quotient p)) :
q.map (p.liftq f h) = (q.comap p.mkq).map f :=
le_antisymm
(by rintro _ ⟨⟨x⟩, hxq, rfl⟩; exact ⟨x, hxq, rfl⟩)
(by rintro _ ⟨x, hxq, rfl⟩; exact ⟨quotient.mk x, hxq, rfl⟩)
theorem ker_liftq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) :
ker (p.liftq f h) = (ker f).map (mkq p) := comap_liftq _ _ _ _
theorem range_liftq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) :
range (p.liftq f h) = range f := map_liftq _ _ _ _
theorem ker_liftq_eq_bot (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) (h' : ker f ≤ p) : ker (p.liftq f h) = ⊥ :=
by rw [ker_liftq, le_antisymm h h', mkq_map_self]
/-- The correspondence theorem for modules: there is an order isomorphism between submodules of the
quotient of `M` by `p`, and submodules of `M` larger than `p`. -/
def comap_mkq.rel_iso :
submodule R p.quotient ≃o {p' : submodule R M // p ≤ p'} :=
{ to_fun := λ p', ⟨comap p.mkq p', le_comap_mkq p _⟩,
inv_fun := λ q, map p.mkq q,
left_inv := λ p', map_comap_eq_self $ by simp,
right_inv := λ ⟨q, hq⟩, subtype.ext_val $ by simpa [comap_map_mkq p],
map_rel_iff' := λ p₁ p₂, (comap_le_comap_iff $ range_mkq _).symm }
/-- The ordering on submodules of the quotient of `M` by `p` embeds into the ordering on submodules
of `M`. -/
def comap_mkq.order_embedding :
submodule R p.quotient ↪o submodule R M :=
(rel_iso.to_rel_embedding $ comap_mkq.rel_iso p).trans (subtype.rel_embedding _ _)
@[simp] lemma comap_mkq_embedding_eq (p' : submodule R p.quotient) :
comap_mkq.order_embedding p p' = comap p.mkq p' := rfl
end ring
end submodule
namespace linear_map
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃]
lemma range_mkq_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : f.range.mkq.comp f = 0 :=
linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp
lemma ker_le_range_iff {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃} :
g.ker ≤ f.range ↔ f.range.mkq.comp g.ker.subtype = 0 :=
by rw [←range_le_ker_iff, submodule.ker_mkq, submodule.range_subtype]
/-- A monomorphism is injective. -/
lemma ker_eq_bot_of_cancel {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂}
(h : ∀ (u v : f.ker →ₗ[R] M), f.comp u = f.comp v → u = v) : f.ker = ⊥ :=
begin
have h₁ : f.comp (0 : f.ker →ₗ[R] M) = 0 := comp_zero _,
rw [←submodule.range_subtype f.ker, ←h 0 f.ker.subtype (eq.trans h₁ (comp_ker_subtype f).symm)],
exact range_zero
end
/-- An epimorphism is surjective. -/
lemma range_eq_top_of_cancel {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂}
(h : ∀ (u v : M₂ →ₗ[R] f.range.quotient), u.comp f = v.comp f → u = v) : f.range = ⊤ :=
begin
have h₁ : (0 : M₂ →ₗ[R] f.range.quotient).comp f = 0 := zero_comp _,
rw [←submodule.ker_mkq f.range, ←h 0 f.range.mkq (eq.trans h₁ (range_mkq_comp _).symm)],
exact ker_zero
end
end linear_map
@[simp] lemma linear_map.range_range_restrict [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) :
f.range_restrict.range = ⊤ :=
by simp [f.range_cod_restrict _]
/-! ### Linear equivalences -/
namespace linear_equiv
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[add_comm_monoid M₃] [add_comm_monoid M₄]
section
variables {semimodule_M : semimodule R M} {semimodule_M₂ : semimodule R M₂}
variables (e e' : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂)
lemma map_eq_comap {p : submodule R M} : (p.map e : submodule R M₂) = p.comap e.symm :=
submodule.coe_injective $ by simp [e.image_eq_preimage]
/-- A linear equivalence of two modules restricts to a linear equivalence from any submodule
of the domain onto the image of the submodule. -/
def of_submodule (p : submodule R M) : p ≃ₗ[R] ↥(p.map ↑e : submodule R M₂) :=
{ inv_fun := λ y, ⟨e.symm y, by {
rcases y with ⟨y', hy⟩, rw submodule.mem_map at hy, rcases hy with ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩, subst hxy,
simp only [symm_apply_apply, submodule.coe_mk, coe_coe, hx], }⟩,
left_inv := λ x, by simp,
right_inv := λ y, by { apply set_coe.ext, simp, },
..((e : M →ₗ[R] M₂).dom_restrict p).cod_restrict (p.map ↑e) (λ x, ⟨x, by simp⟩) }
@[simp] lemma of_submodule_apply (p : submodule R M) (x : p) :
↑(e.of_submodule p x) = e x := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_submodule_symm_apply (p : submodule R M) (x : (p.map ↑e : submodule R M₂)) :
↑((e.of_submodule p).symm x) = e.symm x := rfl
end
section prod
variables {semimodule_M : semimodule R M} {semimodule_M₂ : semimodule R M₂}
variables {semimodule_M₃ : semimodule R M₃} {semimodule_M₄ : semimodule R M₄}
variables (e₁ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₃ ≃ₗ[R] M₄)
/-- Product of linear equivalences; the maps come from `equiv.prod_congr`. -/
protected def prod :
(M × M₃) ≃ₗ[R] (M₂ × M₄) :=
{ map_add' := λ x y, prod.ext (e₁.map_add _ _) (e₂.map_add _ _),
map_smul' := λ c x, prod.ext (e₁.map_smul c _) (e₂.map_smul c _),
.. equiv.prod_congr e₁.to_equiv e₂.to_equiv }
lemma prod_symm : (e₁.prod e₂).symm = e₁.symm.prod e₂.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma prod_apply (p) :
e₁.prod e₂ p = (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod :
(e₁.prod e₂ : (M × M₃) →ₗ[R] (M₂ × M₄)) = (e₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂).prod_map (e₂ : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) := rfl
end prod
section uncurry
variables (V V₂ R)
/-- Linear equivalence between a curried and uncurried function.
Differs from `tensor_product.curry`. -/
protected def uncurry :
(V → V₂ → R) ≃ₗ[R] (V × V₂ → R) :=
{ map_add' := λ _ _, by { ext ⟨⟩, refl },
map_smul' := λ _ _, by { ext ⟨⟩, refl },
.. equiv.arrow_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow _ _ _}
@[simp] lemma coe_uncurry : ⇑(linear_equiv.uncurry R V V₂) = uncurry := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_uncurry_symm : ⇑(linear_equiv.uncurry R V V₂).symm = curry := rfl
end uncurry
section
variables {semimodule_M : semimodule R M} {semimodule_M₂ : semimodule R M₂}
variables (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂)
variables (p q : submodule R M)
/-- Linear equivalence between two equal submodules. -/
def of_eq (h : p = q) : p ≃ₗ[R] q :=
{ map_smul' := λ _ _, rfl, map_add' := λ _ _, rfl, .. equiv.set.of_eq (congr_arg _ h) }
variables {p q}
@[simp] lemma coe_of_eq_apply (h : p = q) (x : p) : (of_eq p q h x : M) = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_eq_symm (h : p = q) : (of_eq p q h).symm = of_eq q p h.symm := rfl
/-- A linear equivalence which maps a submodule of one module onto another, restricts to a linear
equivalence of the two submodules. -/
def of_submodules (p : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂) (h : p.map ↑e = q) : p ≃ₗ[R] q :=
(e.of_submodule p).trans (linear_equiv.of_eq _ _ h)
@[simp] lemma of_submodules_apply {p : submodule R M} {q : submodule R M₂}
(h : p.map ↑e = q) (x : p) : ↑(e.of_submodules p q h x) = e x := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_submodules_symm_apply {p : submodule R M} {q : submodule R M₂}
(h : p.map ↑e = q) (x : q) : ↑((e.of_submodules p q h).symm x) = e.symm x := rfl
variable (p)
/-- The top submodule of `M` is linearly equivalent to `M`. -/
def of_top (h : p = ⊤) : p ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ inv_fun := λ x, ⟨x, h.symm ▸ trivial⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨x, h⟩, rfl,
right_inv := λ x, rfl,
.. p.subtype }
@[simp] theorem of_top_apply {h} (x : p) : of_top p h x = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_of_top_symm_apply {h} (x : M) : ((of_top p h).symm x : M) = x := rfl
theorem of_top_symm_apply {h} (x : M) : (of_top p h).symm x = ⟨x, h.symm ▸ trivial⟩ := rfl
/-- If a linear map has an inverse, it is a linear equivalence. -/
def of_linear (h₁ : f.comp g = linear_map.id) (h₂ : g.comp f = linear_map.id) : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ inv_fun := g,
left_inv := linear_map.ext_iff.1 h₂,
right_inv := linear_map.ext_iff.1 h₁,
..f }
@[simp] theorem of_linear_apply {h₁ h₂} (x : M) : of_linear f g h₁ h₂ x = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem of_linear_symm_apply {h₁ h₂} (x : M₂) : (of_linear f g h₁ h₂).symm x = g x := rfl
@[simp] protected theorem range : (e : M →ₗ[R] M₂).range = ⊤ :=
linear_map.range_eq_top.2 e.to_equiv.surjective
lemma eq_bot_of_equiv [semimodule R M₂] (e : p ≃ₗ[R] (⊥ : submodule R M₂)) : p = ⊥ :=
begin
refine bot_unique (submodule.le_def'.2 $ assume b hb, (submodule.mem_bot R).2 _),
rw [← p.mk_eq_zero hb, ← e.map_eq_zero_iff],
apply submodule.eq_zero_of_bot_submodule
end
@[simp] protected theorem ker : (e : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker = ⊥ :=
linear_map.ker_eq_bot_of_injective e.to_equiv.injective
end
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables [semiring R]
variables [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃] [add_comm_group M₄]
variables {semimodule_M : semimodule R M} {semimodule_M₂ : semimodule R M₂}
variables {semimodule_M₃ : semimodule R M₃} {semimodule_M₄ : semimodule R M₄}
variables (e e₁ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₃ ≃ₗ[R] M₄)
@[simp] theorem map_neg (a : M) : e (-a) = -e a := e.to_linear_map.map_neg a
@[simp] theorem map_sub (a b : M) : e (a - b) = e a - e b :=
e.to_linear_map.map_sub a b
/-- Equivalence given by a block lower diagonal matrix. `e₁` and `e₂` are diagonal square blocks,
and `f` is a rectangular block below the diagonal. -/
protected def skew_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₄) :
(M × M₃) ≃ₗ[R] M₂ × M₄ :=
{ inv_fun := λ p : M₂ × M₄, (e₁.symm p.1, e₂.symm (p.2 - f (e₁.symm p.1))),
left_inv := λ p, by simp,
right_inv := λ p, by simp,
.. ((e₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂).comp (linear_map.fst R M M₃)).prod
((e₂ : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄).comp (linear_map.snd R M M₃) +
f.comp (linear_map.fst R M M₃)) }
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₄) (x) :
e₁.skew_prod e₂ f x = (e₁ x.1, e₂ x.2 + f x.1) := rfl
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_symm_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₄) (x) :
(e₁.skew_prod e₂ f).symm x = (e₁.symm x.1, e₂.symm (x.2 - f (e₁.symm x.1))) := rfl
end add_comm_group
section neg
variables (R) [semiring R] [add_comm_group M] [semimodule R M]
/-- `x ↦ -x` as a `linear_equiv` -/
def neg : M ≃ₗ[R] M := { .. equiv.neg M, .. (-linear_map.id : M →ₗ[R] M) }
variable {R}
@[simp] lemma coe_neg : ⇑(neg R : M ≃ₗ[R] M) = -id := rfl
lemma neg_apply (x : M) : neg R x = -x := by simp
@[simp] lemma symm_neg : (neg R : M ≃ₗ[R] M).symm = neg R := rfl
end neg
section ring
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂]
variables {semimodule_M : semimodule R M} {semimodule_M₂ : semimodule R M₂}
variables (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂)
/-- An `injective` linear map `f : M →ₗ[R] M₂` defines a linear equivalence
between `M` and `f.range`. -/
noncomputable def of_injective (h : f.ker = ⊥) : M ≃ₗ[R] f.range :=
{ .. (equiv.set.range f $ linear_map.ker_eq_bot.1 h).trans (equiv.set.of_eq f.range_coe.symm),
.. f.cod_restrict f.range (λ x, f.mem_range_self x) }
@[simp] theorem of_injective_apply {h : f.ker = ⊥} (x : M) :
↑(of_injective f h x) = f x := rfl
/-- A bijective linear map is a linear equivalence. Here, bijectivity is described by saying that
the kernel of `f` is `{0}` and the range is the universal set. -/
noncomputable def of_bijective (hf₁ : f.ker = ⊥) (hf₂ : f.range = ⊤) : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
(of_injective f hf₁).trans (of_top _ hf₂)
@[simp] theorem of_bijective_apply {hf₁ hf₂} (x : M) :
of_bijective f hf₁ hf₂ x = f x := rfl
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
open linear_map
/-- Multiplying by a unit `a` of the ring `R` is a linear equivalence. -/
def smul_of_unit (a : units R) : M ≃ₗ[R] M :=
of_linear ((a:R) • 1 : M →ₗ M) (((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • 1 : M →ₗ M)
(by rw [smul_comp, comp_smul, smul_smul, units.mul_inv, one_smul]; refl)
(by rw [smul_comp, comp_smul, smul_smul, units.inv_mul, one_smul]; refl)
/-- A linear isomorphism between the domains and codomains of two spaces of linear maps gives a
linear isomorphism between the two function spaces. -/
def arrow_congr {R M₁ M₂ M₂₁ M₂₂ : Sort*} [comm_ring R]
[add_comm_group M₁] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₂₁] [add_comm_group M₂₂]
[module R M₁] [module R M₂] [module R M₂₁] [module R M₂₂]
(e₁ : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂₂) :
(M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂₁) ≃ₗ[R] (M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂₂) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, (e₂ : M₂₁ →ₗ[R] M₂₂).comp $ f.comp e₁.symm,
inv_fun := λ f, (e₂.symm : M₂₂ →ₗ[R] M₂₁).comp $ f.comp e₁,
left_inv := λ f, by { ext x, simp },
right_inv := λ f, by { ext x, simp },
map_add' := λ f g, by { ext x, simp },
map_smul' := λ c f, by { ext x, simp } }
@[simp] lemma arrow_congr_apply {R M₁ M₂ M₂₁ M₂₂ : Sort*} [comm_ring R]
[add_comm_group M₁] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₂₁] [add_comm_group M₂₂]
[module R M₁] [module R M₂] [module R M₂₁] [module R M₂₂]
(e₁ : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂₂) (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂₁) (x : M₂) :
arrow_congr e₁ e₂ f x = e₂ (f (e₁.symm x)) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma arrow_congr_symm_apply {R M₁ M₂ M₂₁ M₂₂ : Sort*} [comm_ring R]
[add_comm_group M₁] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₂₁] [add_comm_group M₂₂]
[module R M₁] [module R M₂] [module R M₂₁] [module R M₂₂]
(e₁ : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂₂) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂₂) (x : M₁) :
(arrow_congr e₁ e₂).symm f x = e₂.symm (f (e₁ x)) :=
rfl
lemma arrow_congr_comp {N N₂ N₃ : Sort*}
[add_comm_group N] [add_comm_group N₂] [add_comm_group N₃]
[module R N] [module R N₂] [module R N₃]
(e₁ : M ≃ₗ[R] N) (e₂ : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] N₂) (e₃ : M₃ ≃ₗ[R] N₃) (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
arrow_congr e₁ e₃ (g.comp f) = (arrow_congr e₂ e₃ g).comp (arrow_congr e₁ e₂ f) :=
by { ext, simp only [symm_apply_apply, arrow_congr_apply, linear_map.comp_apply], }
lemma arrow_congr_trans {M₁ M₂ M₃ N₁ N₂ N₃ : Sort*}
[add_comm_group M₁] [module R M₁] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂]
[add_comm_group M₃] [module R M₃] [add_comm_group N₁] [module R N₁]
[add_comm_group N₂] [module R N₂] [add_comm_group N₃] [module R N₃]
(e₁ : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : N₁ ≃ₗ[R] N₂) (e₃ : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₃) (e₄ : N₂ ≃ₗ[R] N₃) :
(arrow_congr e₁ e₂).trans (arrow_congr e₃ e₄) = arrow_congr (e₁.trans e₃) (e₂.trans e₄) :=
rfl
/-- If `M₂` and `M₃` are linearly isomorphic then the two spaces of linear maps from `M` into `M₂`
and `M` into `M₃` are linearly isomorphic. -/
def congr_right (f : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₃) : (M →ₗ[R] M₂) ≃ₗ (M →ₗ M₃) :=
arrow_congr (linear_equiv.refl R M) f
/-- If `M` and `M₂` are linearly isomorphic then the two spaces of linear maps from `M` and `M₂` to
themselves are linearly isomorphic. -/
def conj (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) : (module.End R M) ≃ₗ[R] (module.End R M₂) := arrow_congr e e
lemma conj_apply (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (f : module.End R M) :
e.conj f = ((↑e : M →ₗ[R] M₂).comp f).comp e.symm := rfl
lemma symm_conj_apply (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (f : module.End R M₂) :
e.symm.conj f = ((↑e.symm : M₂ →ₗ[R] M).comp f).comp e := rfl
lemma conj_comp (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (f g : module.End R M) :
e.conj (g.comp f) = (e.conj g).comp (e.conj f) :=
arrow_congr_comp e e e f g
lemma conj_trans (e₁ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₃) :
e₁.conj.trans e₂.conj = (e₁.trans e₂).conj :=
by { ext f x, refl, }
@[simp] lemma conj_id (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) : e.conj linear_map.id = linear_map.id :=
by { ext, simp [conj_apply], }
end comm_ring
section field
variables [field K] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [module K M] [module K M₂] [module K M₃]
variables (K) (M)
open linear_map
/-- Multiplying by a nonzero element `a` of the field `K` is a linear equivalence. -/
def smul_of_ne_zero (a : K) (ha : a ≠ 0) : M ≃ₗ[K] M :=
smul_of_unit $ units.mk0 a ha
section
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
lemma ker_to_span_singleton {x : M} (h : x ≠ 0) : (to_span_singleton K M x).ker = ⊥ :=
begin
ext c, split,
{ intros hc, rw submodule.mem_bot, rw mem_ker at hc, by_contra hc',
have : x = 0,
calc x = c⁻¹ • (c • x) : by rw [← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel hc', one_smul]
... = c⁻¹ • ((to_span_singleton K M x) c) : rfl
... = 0 : by rw [hc, smul_zero],
tauto },
{ rw [mem_ker, submodule.mem_bot], intros h, rw h, simp }
end
/-- Given a nonzero element `x` of a vector space `M` over a field `K`, the natural
map from `K` to the span of `x`, with invertibility check to consider it as an
isomorphism.-/
def to_span_nonzero_singleton (x : M) (h : x ≠ 0) : K ≃ₗ[K] (K ∙ x) :=
linear_equiv.trans
(linear_equiv.of_injective (to_span_singleton K M x) (ker_to_span_singleton K M h))
(of_eq (to_span_singleton K M x).range (K ∙ x)
(span_singleton_eq_range K M x).symm)
lemma to_span_nonzero_singleton_one (x : M) (h : x ≠ 0) : to_span_nonzero_singleton K M x h 1
= (⟨x, submodule.mem_span_singleton_self x⟩ : K ∙ x) :=
begin
apply submodule.coe_eq_coe.mp,
have : ↑(to_span_nonzero_singleton K M x h 1) = to_span_singleton K M x 1 := rfl,
rw [this, to_span_singleton_one, submodule.coe_mk],
end
/-- Given a nonzero element `x` of a vector space `M` over a field `K`, the natural map
from the span of `x` to `K`.-/
abbreviation coord (x : M) (h : x ≠ 0) : (K ∙ x) ≃ₗ[K] K :=
(to_span_nonzero_singleton K M x h).symm
lemma coord_self (x : M) (h : x ≠ 0) :
(coord K M x h) (⟨x, submodule.mem_span_singleton_self x⟩ : K ∙ x) = 1 :=
by rw [← to_span_nonzero_singleton_one K M x h, symm_apply_apply]
end
end field
end linear_equiv
namespace submodule
section semimodule
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
/-- If `s ≤ t`, then we can view `s` as a submodule of `t` by taking the comap
of `t.subtype`. -/
def comap_subtype_equiv_of_le {p q : submodule R M} (hpq : p ≤ q) :
comap q.subtype p ≃ₗ[R] p :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨x, x.2⟩,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨⟨x, hpq x.2⟩, x.2⟩,
left_inv := λ x, by simp only [coe_mk, submodule.eta, coe_coe],
right_inv := λ x, by simp only [subtype.coe_mk, submodule.eta, coe_coe],
map_add' := λ x y, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c x, rfl }
end semimodule
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables (p : submodule R M)
open linear_map
/-- If `p = ⊥`, then `M / p ≃ₗ[R] M`. -/
def quot_equiv_of_eq_bot (hp : p = ⊥) : p.quotient ≃ₗ[R] M :=
linear_equiv.of_linear (p.liftq id $ hp.symm ▸ bot_le) p.mkq (liftq_mkq _ _ _) $
p.quot_hom_ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] lemma quot_equiv_of_eq_bot_apply_mk (hp : p = ⊥) (x : M) :
p.quot_equiv_of_eq_bot hp (quotient.mk x) = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma quot_equiv_of_eq_bot_symm_apply (hp : p = ⊥) (x : M) :
(p.quot_equiv_of_eq_bot hp).symm x = quotient.mk x := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_quot_equiv_of_eq_bot_symm (hp : p = ⊥) :
((p.quot_equiv_of_eq_bot hp).symm : M →ₗ[R] p.quotient) = p.mkq := rfl
variables (q : submodule R M)
/-- Quotienting by equal submodules gives linearly equivalent quotients. -/
def quot_equiv_of_eq (h : p = q) : p.quotient ≃ₗ[R] q.quotient :=
{ map_add' := by { rintros ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩, refl }, map_smul' := by { rintros x ⟨y⟩, refl },
..@quotient.congr _ _ (quotient_rel p) (quotient_rel q) (equiv.refl _) $
λ a b, by { subst h, refl } }
end submodule
namespace submodule
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M] [module R M₂]
variables (p : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂)
@[simp] lemma mem_map_equiv {e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂} {x : M₂} : x ∈ p.map (e : M →ₗ[R] M₂) ↔ e.symm x ∈ p :=
begin
rw submodule.mem_map, split,
{ rintros ⟨y, hy, hx⟩, simp [←hx, hy], },
{ intros hx, refine ⟨e.symm x, hx, by simp⟩, },
end
lemma comap_le_comap_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (c : R) :
comap f q ≤ comap (c • f) q :=
begin
rw le_def',
intros m h,
change c • (f m) ∈ q,
change f m ∈ q at h,
apply q.smul_mem _ h,
end
lemma inf_comap_le_comap_add (f₁ f₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂) :
comap f₁ q ⊓ comap f₂ q ≤ comap (f₁ + f₂) q :=
begin
rw le_def',
intros m h,
change f₁ m + f₂ m ∈ q,
change f₁ m ∈ q ∧ f₂ m ∈ q at h,
apply q.add_mem h.1 h.2,
end
/-- Given modules `M`, `M₂` over a commutative ring, together with submodules `p ⊆ M`, `q ⊆ M₂`, the
set of maps $\\{f ∈ Hom(M, M₂) | f(p) ⊆ q \\}$ is a submodule of `Hom(M, M₂)`. -/
def compatible_maps : submodule R (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
{ carrier := {f | p ≤ comap f q},
zero_mem' := by { change p ≤ comap 0 q, rw comap_zero, refine le_top, },
add_mem' := λ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂, by { apply le_trans _ (inf_comap_le_comap_add q f₁ f₂), rw le_inf_iff,
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, },
smul_mem' := λ c f h, le_trans h (comap_le_comap_smul q f c), }
/-- Given modules `M`, `M₂` over a commutative ring, together with submodules `p ⊆ M`, `q ⊆ M₂`, the
natural map $\\{f ∈ Hom(M, M₂) | f(p) ⊆ q \\} \to Hom(M/p, M₂/q)$ is linear. -/
def mapq_linear : compatible_maps p q →ₗ[R] p.quotient →ₗ[R] q.quotient :=
{ to_fun := λ f, mapq _ _ f.val f.property,
map_add' := λ x y, by { ext m', apply quotient.induction_on' m', intros m, refl, },
map_smul' := λ c f, by { ext m', apply quotient.induction_on' m', intros m, refl, } }
end submodule
namespace equiv
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [semimodule R M₂]
/-- An equivalence whose underlying function is linear is a linear equivalence. -/
def to_linear_equiv (e : M ≃ M₂) (h : is_linear_map R (e : M → M₂)) : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ .. e, .. h.mk' e}
end equiv
namespace add_equiv
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [semimodule R M₂]
/-- An additive equivalence whose underlying function preserves `smul` is a linear equivalence. -/
def to_linear_equiv (e : M ≃+ M₂) (h : ∀ (c : R) x, e (c • x) = c • e x) : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ map_smul' := h, .. e, }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_linear_equiv (e : M ≃+ M₂) (h : ∀ (c : R) x, e (c • x) = c • e x) :
⇑(e.to_linear_equiv h) = e :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_linear_equiv_symm (e : M ≃+ M₂) (h : ∀ (c : R) x, e (c • x) = c • e x) :
⇑(e.to_linear_equiv h).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
end add_equiv
namespace linear_map
open submodule
section isomorphism_laws
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃]
variables (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
/-- The first isomorphism law for modules. The quotient of `M` by the kernel of `f` is linearly
equivalent to the range of `f`. -/
noncomputable def quot_ker_equiv_range : f.ker.quotient ≃ₗ[R] f.range :=
(linear_equiv.of_injective (f.ker.liftq f $ le_refl _) $
submodule.ker_liftq_eq_bot _ _ _ (le_refl f.ker)).trans
(linear_equiv.of_eq _ _ $ submodule.range_liftq _ _ _)
@[simp] lemma quot_ker_equiv_range_apply_mk (x : M) :
(f.quot_ker_equiv_range (submodule.quotient.mk x) : M₂) = f x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma quot_ker_equiv_range_symm_apply_image (x : M) (h : f x ∈ f.range) :
f.quot_ker_equiv_range.symm ⟨f x, h⟩ = f.ker.mkq x :=
f.quot_ker_equiv_range.symm_apply_apply (f.ker.mkq x)
/--
Canonical linear map from the quotient `p/(p ∩ p')` to `(p+p')/p'`, mapping `x + (p ∩ p')`
to `x + p'`, where `p` and `p'` are submodules of an ambient module.
-/
def quotient_inf_to_sup_quotient (p p' : submodule R M) :
(comap p.subtype (p ⊓ p')).quotient →ₗ[R] (comap (p ⊔ p').subtype p').quotient :=
(comap p.subtype (p ⊓ p')).liftq
((comap (p ⊔ p').subtype p').mkq.comp (of_le le_sup_left)) begin
rw [ker_comp, of_le, comap_cod_restrict, ker_mkq, map_comap_subtype],
exact comap_mono (inf_le_inf_right _ le_sup_left) end
/--
Second Isomorphism Law : the canonical map from `p/(p ∩ p')` to `(p+p')/p'` as a linear isomorphism.
-/
noncomputable def quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient (p p' : submodule R M) :
(comap p.subtype (p ⊓ p')).quotient ≃ₗ[R] (comap (p ⊔ p').subtype p').quotient :=
linear_equiv.of_bijective (quotient_inf_to_sup_quotient p p')
begin
rw [quotient_inf_to_sup_quotient, ker_liftq_eq_bot],
rw [ker_comp, ker_mkq],
exact λ ⟨x, hx1⟩ hx2, ⟨hx1, hx2⟩
end
begin
rw [quotient_inf_to_sup_quotient, range_liftq, eq_top_iff'],
rintros ⟨x, hx⟩, rcases mem_sup.1 hx with ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩,
use [⟨y, hy⟩, trivial], apply (submodule.quotient.eq _).2,
change y - (y + z) ∈ p',
rwa [sub_add_eq_sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub, neg_mem_iff]
end
@[simp] lemma coe_quotient_inf_to_sup_quotient (p p' : submodule R M) :
⇑(quotient_inf_to_sup_quotient p p') = quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient p p' := rfl
@[simp] lemma quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient_apply_mk (p p' : submodule R M) (x : p) :
quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient p p' (submodule.quotient.mk x) =
submodule.quotient.mk (of_le (le_sup_left : p ≤ p ⊔ p') x) :=
rfl
lemma quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient_symm_apply_left (p p' : submodule R M)
(x : p ⊔ p') (hx : (x:M) ∈ p) :
(quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient p p').symm (submodule.quotient.mk x) =
submodule.quotient.mk ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
(linear_equiv.symm_apply_eq _).2 $ by simp [of_le_apply]
@[simp] lemma quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient_symm_apply_eq_zero_iff {p p' : submodule R M}
{x : p ⊔ p'} :
(quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient p p').symm (submodule.quotient.mk x) = 0 ↔ (x:M) ∈ p' :=
(linear_equiv.symm_apply_eq _).trans $ by simp [of_le_apply]
lemma quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient_symm_apply_right (p p' : submodule R M) {x : p ⊔ p'}
(hx : (x:M) ∈ p') :
(quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient p p').symm (submodule.quotient.mk x) = 0 :=
quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient_symm_apply_eq_zero_iff.2 hx
end isomorphism_laws
section prod
lemma is_linear_map_prod_iso {R M M₂ M₃ : Type*}
[comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[add_comm_group M₃] [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] :
is_linear_map R (λ(p : (M →ₗ[R] M₂) × (M →ₗ[R] M₃)),
(linear_map.prod p.1 p.2 : (M →ₗ[R] (M₂ × M₃)))) :=
⟨λu v, rfl, λc u, rfl⟩
end prod
section pi
universe i
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [semimodule R M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃] [semimodule R M₃]
{φ : ι → Type i} [∀i, add_comm_monoid (φ i)] [∀i, semimodule R (φ i)]
/-- `pi` construction for linear functions. From a family of linear functions it produces a linear
function into a family of modules. -/
def pi (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) : M₂ →ₗ[R] (Πi, φ i) :=
⟨λc i, f i c, λ c d, funext $ λ i, (f i).map_add _ _, λ c d, funext $ λ i, (f i).map_smul _ _⟩
@[simp] lemma pi_apply (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (c : M₂) (i : ι) :
pi f c i = f i c := rfl
lemma ker_pi (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) : ker (pi f) = (⨅i:ι, ker (f i)) :=
by ext c; simp [funext_iff]; refl
lemma pi_eq_zero (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) : pi f = 0 ↔ (∀i, f i = 0) :=
by simp only [linear_map.ext_iff, pi_apply, funext_iff]; exact ⟨λh a b, h b a, λh a b, h b a⟩
lemma pi_zero : pi (λi, 0 : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) = 0 :=
by ext; refl
lemma pi_comp (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₂) : (pi f).comp g = pi (λi, (f i).comp g) :=
rfl
/-- The projections from a family of modules are linear maps. -/
def proj (i : ι) : (Πi, φ i) →ₗ[R] φ i :=
⟨ λa, a i, assume f g, rfl, assume c f, rfl ⟩
@[simp] lemma proj_apply (i : ι) (b : Πi, φ i) : (proj i : (Πi, φ i) →ₗ[R] φ i) b = b i := rfl
lemma proj_pi (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (i : ι) : (proj i).comp (pi f) = f i :=
ext $ assume c, rfl
lemma infi_ker_proj : (⨅i, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i)) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ submodule.le_def'.2 $ assume a h,
begin
simp only [mem_infi, mem_ker, proj_apply] at h,
exact (mem_bot _).2 (funext $ assume i, h i)
end
section
variables (R φ)
/-- If `I` and `J` are disjoint index sets, the product of the kernels of the `J`th projections of
`φ` is linearly equivalent to the product over `I`. -/
def infi_ker_proj_equiv {I J : set ι} [decidable_pred (λi, i ∈ I)]
(hd : disjoint I J) (hu : set.univ ⊆ I ∪ J) :
(⨅i ∈ J, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i)) ≃ₗ[R] (Πi:I, φ i) :=
begin
refine linear_equiv.of_linear
(pi $ λi, (proj (i:ι)).comp (submodule.subtype _))
(cod_restrict _ (pi $ λi, if h : i ∈ I then proj (⟨i, h⟩ : I) else 0) _) _ _,
{ assume b,
simp only [mem_infi, mem_ker, funext_iff, proj_apply, pi_apply],
assume j hjJ,
have : j ∉ I := assume hjI, hd ⟨hjI, hjJ⟩,
rw [dif_neg this, zero_apply] },
{ simp only [pi_comp, comp_assoc, subtype_comp_cod_restrict, proj_pi, dif_pos, subtype.coe_prop],
ext b ⟨j, hj⟩, refl },
{ ext1 ⟨b, hb⟩,
apply subtype.ext,
ext j,
have hb : ∀i ∈ J, b i = 0,
{ simpa only [mem_infi, mem_ker, proj_apply] using (mem_infi _).1 hb },
simp only [comp_apply, pi_apply, id_apply, proj_apply, subtype_apply, cod_restrict_apply],
split_ifs,
{ refl },
{ exact (hb _ $ (hu trivial).resolve_left h).symm } }
end
end
section
variable [decidable_eq ι]
/-- `diag i j` is the identity map if `i = j`. Otherwise it is the constant 0 map. -/
def diag (i j : ι) : φ i →ₗ[R] φ j :=
@function.update ι (λj, φ i →ₗ[R] φ j) _ 0 i id j
lemma update_apply (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (c : M₂) (i j : ι) (b : M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) :
(update f i b j) c = update (λi, f i c) i (b c) j :=
begin
by_cases j = i,
{ rw [h, update_same, update_same] },
{ rw [update_noteq h, update_noteq h] }
end
end
section
variable [decidable_eq ι]
variables (R φ)
/-- The standard basis of the product of `φ`. -/
def std_basis (i : ι) : φ i →ₗ[R] (Πi, φ i) := pi (diag i)
lemma std_basis_apply (i : ι) (b : φ i) : std_basis R φ i b = update 0 i b :=
by ext j; rw [std_basis, pi_apply, diag, update_apply]; refl
@[simp] lemma std_basis_same (i : ι) (b : φ i) : std_basis R φ i b i = b :=
by rw [std_basis_apply, update_same]
lemma std_basis_ne (i j : ι) (h : j ≠ i) (b : φ i) : std_basis R φ i b j = 0 :=
by rw [std_basis_apply, update_noteq h]; refl
lemma ker_std_basis (i : ι) : ker (std_basis R φ i) = ⊥ :=
ker_eq_bot_of_injective $ assume f g hfg,
have std_basis R φ i f i = std_basis R φ i g i := hfg ▸ rfl,
by simpa only [std_basis_same]
lemma proj_comp_std_basis (i j : ι) : (proj i).comp (std_basis R φ j) = diag j i :=
by rw [std_basis, proj_pi]
lemma proj_std_basis_same (i : ι) : (proj i).comp (std_basis R φ i) = id :=
by ext b; simp
lemma proj_std_basis_ne (i j : ι) (h : i ≠ j) : (proj i).comp (std_basis R φ j) = 0 :=
by ext b; simp [std_basis_ne R φ _ _ h]
lemma supr_range_std_basis_le_infi_ker_proj (I J : set ι) (h : disjoint I J) :
(⨆i∈I, range (std_basis R φ i)) ≤ (⨅i∈J, ker (proj i)) :=
begin
refine (supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume hi, range_le_iff_comap.2 _),
simp only [(ker_comp _ _).symm, eq_top_iff, le_def', mem_ker, comap_infi, mem_infi],
assume b hb j hj,
have : i ≠ j := assume eq, h ⟨hi, eq.symm ▸ hj⟩,
rw [proj_std_basis_ne R φ j i this.symm, zero_apply]
end
lemma infi_ker_proj_le_supr_range_std_basis {I : finset ι} {J : set ι} (hu : set.univ ⊆ ↑I ∪ J) :
(⨅ i∈J, ker (proj i)) ≤ (⨆i∈I, range (std_basis R φ i)) :=
submodule.le_def'.2
begin
assume b hb,
simp only [mem_infi, mem_ker, proj_apply] at hb,
rw ← show ∑ i in I, std_basis R φ i (b i) = b,
{ ext i,
rw [finset.sum_apply, ← std_basis_same R φ i (b i)],
refine finset.sum_eq_single i (assume j hjI ne, std_basis_ne _ _ _ _ ne.symm _) _,
assume hiI,
rw [std_basis_same],
exact hb _ ((hu trivial).resolve_left hiI) },
exact sum_mem _ (assume i hiI, mem_supr_of_mem i $ mem_supr_of_mem hiI $
(std_basis R φ i).mem_range_self (b i))
end
lemma supr_range_std_basis_eq_infi_ker_proj {I J : set ι}
(hd : disjoint I J) (hu : set.univ ⊆ I ∪ J) (hI : set.finite I) :
(⨆i∈I, range (std_basis R φ i)) = (⨅i∈J, ker (proj i)) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (supr_range_std_basis_le_infi_ker_proj _ _ _ _ hd) _,
have : set.univ ⊆ ↑hI.to_finset ∪ J, { rwa [hI.coe_to_finset] },
refine le_trans (infi_ker_proj_le_supr_range_std_basis R φ this) (supr_le_supr $ assume i, _),
rw [set.finite.mem_to_finset],
exact le_refl _
end
lemma supr_range_std_basis [fintype ι] : (⨆i:ι, range (std_basis R φ i)) = ⊤ :=
have (set.univ : set ι) ⊆ ↑(finset.univ : finset ι) ∪ ∅ := by rw [finset.coe_univ, set.union_empty],
begin
apply top_unique,
convert (infi_ker_proj_le_supr_range_std_basis R φ this),
exact infi_emptyset.symm,
exact (funext $ λi, (@supr_pos _ _ _ (λh, range (std_basis R φ i)) $ finset.mem_univ i).symm)
end
lemma disjoint_std_basis_std_basis (I J : set ι) (h : disjoint I J) :
disjoint (⨆i∈I, range (std_basis R φ i)) (⨆i∈J, range (std_basis R φ i)) :=
begin
refine disjoint.mono
(supr_range_std_basis_le_infi_ker_proj _ _ _ _ $ disjoint_compl_right)
(supr_range_std_basis_le_infi_ker_proj _ _ _ _ $ disjoint_compl_right) _,
simp only [disjoint, submodule.le_def', mem_infi, mem_inf, mem_ker, mem_bot, proj_apply,
funext_iff],
rintros b ⟨hI, hJ⟩ i,
classical,
by_cases hiI : i ∈ I,
{ by_cases hiJ : i ∈ J,
{ exact (h ⟨hiI, hiJ⟩).elim },
{ exact hJ i hiJ } },
{ exact hI i hiI }
end
lemma std_basis_eq_single {a : R} :
(λ (i : ι), (std_basis R (λ _ : ι, R) i) a) = λ (i : ι), (finsupp.single i a) :=
begin
ext i j,
rw [std_basis_apply, finsupp.single_apply],
split_ifs,
{ rw [h, function.update_same] },
{ rw [function.update_noteq (ne.symm h)], refl },
end
end
end pi
section fun_left
variables (R M) [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
variables {m n p : Type*}
/-- Given an `R`-module `M` and a function `m → n` between arbitrary types,
construct a linear map `(n → M) →ₗ[R] (m → M)` -/
def fun_left (f : m → n) : (n → M) →ₗ[R] (m → M) :=
mk (∘f) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
@[simp] theorem fun_left_apply (f : m → n) (g : n → M) (i : m) : fun_left R M f g i = g (f i) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem fun_left_id (g : n → M) : fun_left R M _root_.id g = g :=
rfl
theorem fun_left_comp (f₁ : n → p) (f₂ : m → n) :
fun_left R M (f₁ ∘ f₂) = (fun_left R M f₂).comp (fun_left R M f₁) :=
rfl
/-- Given an `R`-module `M` and an equivalence `m ≃ n` between arbitrary types,
construct a linear equivalence `(n → M) ≃ₗ[R] (m → M)` -/
def fun_congr_left (e : m ≃ n) : (n → M) ≃ₗ[R] (m → M) :=
linear_equiv.of_linear (fun_left R M e) (fun_left R M e.symm)
(ext $ λ x, funext $ λ i,
by rw [id_apply, ← fun_left_comp, equiv.symm_comp_self, fun_left_id])
(ext $ λ x, funext $ λ i,
by rw [id_apply, ← fun_left_comp, equiv.self_comp_symm, fun_left_id])
@[simp] theorem fun_congr_left_apply (e : m ≃ n) (x : n → M) :
fun_congr_left R M e x = fun_left R M e x :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem fun_congr_left_id :
fun_congr_left R M (equiv.refl n) = linear_equiv.refl R (n → M) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem fun_congr_left_comp (e₁ : m ≃ n) (e₂ : n ≃ p) :
fun_congr_left R M (equiv.trans e₁ e₂) =
linear_equiv.trans (fun_congr_left R M e₂) (fun_congr_left R M e₁) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma fun_congr_left_symm (e : m ≃ n) :
(fun_congr_left R M e).symm = fun_congr_left R M e.symm :=
rfl
end fun_left
universe i
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
variables (R M)
instance automorphism_group : group (M ≃ₗ[R] M) :=
{ mul := λ f g, g.trans f,
one := linear_equiv.refl R M,
inv := λ f, f.symm,
mul_assoc := λ f g h, by {ext, refl},
mul_one := λ f, by {ext, refl},
one_mul := λ f, by {ext, refl},
mul_left_inv := λ f, by {ext, exact f.left_inv x} }
instance automorphism_group.to_linear_map_is_monoid_hom :
is_monoid_hom (linear_equiv.to_linear_map : (M ≃ₗ[R] M) → (M →ₗ[R] M)) :=
{ map_one := rfl,
map_mul := λ f g, rfl }
/-- The group of invertible linear maps from `M` to itself -/
@[reducible] def general_linear_group := units (M →ₗ[R] M)
namespace general_linear_group
variables {R M}
instance : has_coe_to_fun (general_linear_group R M) := by apply_instance
/-- An invertible linear map `f` determines an equivalence from `M` to itself. -/
def to_linear_equiv (f : general_linear_group R M) : (M ≃ₗ[R] M) :=
{ inv_fun := f.inv.to_fun,
left_inv := λ m, show (f.inv * f.val) m = m,
by erw f.inv_val; simp,
right_inv := λ m, show (f.val * f.inv) m = m,
by erw f.val_inv; simp,
..f.val }
/-- An equivalence from `M` to itself determines an invertible linear map. -/
def of_linear_equiv (f : (M ≃ₗ[R] M)) : general_linear_group R M :=
{ val := f,
inv := f.symm,
val_inv := linear_map.ext $ λ _, f.apply_symm_apply _,
inv_val := linear_map.ext $ λ _, f.symm_apply_apply _ }
variables (R M)
/-- The general linear group on `R` and `M` is multiplicatively equivalent to the type of linear
equivalences between `M` and itself. -/
def general_linear_equiv : general_linear_group R M ≃* (M ≃ₗ[R] M) :=
{ to_fun := to_linear_equiv,
inv_fun := of_linear_equiv,
left_inv := λ f, by { ext, refl },
right_inv := λ f, by { ext, refl },
map_mul' := λ x y, by {ext, refl} }
@[simp] lemma general_linear_equiv_to_linear_map (f : general_linear_group R M) :
(general_linear_equiv R M f : M →ₗ[R] M) = f :=
by {ext, refl}
end general_linear_group
end linear_map
|
dd56e86d8e1fb285a76e0911d1c98bd12cdd823f | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/data/fin/basic.lean | a5ba4089bbf0591118795d95e4f96885164b5463 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 72,588 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import algebra.ne_zero
import algebra.order.with_zero
import order.rel_iso.basic
import data.nat.order.basic
import order.hom.set
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
`fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `fin_zero_elim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `fin 0`, generalizes `fin.elim0`.
* `fin.succ_rec` : Define `C n i` by induction on `i : fin n` interpreted
as `(0 : fin (n - i)).succ.succ…`. This function has two arguments: `H0 n` defines
`0`-th element `C (n+1) 0` of an `(n+1)`-tuple, and `Hs n i` defines `(i+1)`-st element
of `(n+1)`-tuple based on `n`, `i`, and `i`-th element of `n`-tuple.
* `fin.succ_rec_on` : same as `fin.succ_rec` but `i : fin n` is the first argument;
* `fin.induction` : Define `C i` by induction on `i : fin (n + 1)`, separating into the
`nat`-like base cases of `C 0` and `C (i.succ)`.
* `fin.induction_on` : same as `fin.induction` but with `i : fin (n + 1)` as the first argument.
* `fin.cases` : define `f : Π i : fin n.succ, C i` by separately handling the cases `i = 0` and
`i = fin.succ j`, `j : fin n`, defined using `fin.induction`.
* `fin.reverse_induction`: reverse induction on `i : fin (n + 1)`; given `C (fin.last n)` and
`∀ i : fin n, C (fin.succ i) → C (fin.cast_succ i)`, constructs all values `C i` by going down;
* `fin.last_cases`: define `f : Π i, fin (n + 1), C i` by separately handling the cases
`i = fin.last n` and `i = fin.cast_succ j`, a special case of `fin.reverse_induction`;
* `fin.add_cases`: define a function on `fin (m + n)` by separately handling the cases
`fin.cast_add n i` and `fin.nat_add m i`;
* `fin.succ_above_cases`: given `i : fin (n + 1)`, define a function on `fin (n + 1)` by separately
handling the cases `j = i` and `j = fin.succ_above i k`, same as `fin.insert_nth` but marked
as eliminator and works for `Sort*`.
### Order embeddings and an order isomorphism
* `fin.order_iso_subtype` : coercion to `{ i // i < n }` as an `order_iso`;
* `fin.coe_embedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `embedding`;
* `fin.coe_order_embedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `order_embedding`;
* `fin.succ_embedding` : `fin.succ` as an `order_embedding`;
* `fin.cast_le h` : embed `fin n` into `fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `fin.cast eq` : order isomorphism between `fin n` and fin m` provided that `n = m`,
see also `equiv.fin_congr`;
* `fin.cast_add m` : embed `fin n` into `fin (n+m)`;
* `fin.cast_succ` : embed `fin n` into `fin (n+1)`;
* `fin.succ_above p` : embed `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`;
* `fin.add_nat m i` : add `m` on `i` on the right, generalizes `fin.succ`;
* `fin.nat_add n i` adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `fin.of_nat'`: given a positive number `n` (deduced from `[ne_zero n]`), `fin.of_nat' i` is
`i % n` interpreted as an element of `fin n`;
* `fin.cast_lt i h` : embed `i` into a `fin` where `h` proves it belongs into;
* `fin.pred_above (p : fin n) i` : embed `i : fin (n+1)` into `fin n` by subtracting one if `p < i`;
* `fin.cast_pred` : embed `fin (n + 2)` into `fin (n + 1)` by mapping `fin.last (n + 1)` to
`fin.last n`;
* `fin.sub_nat i h` : subtract `m` from `i ≥ m`, generalizes `fin.pred`;
* `fin.clamp n m` : `min n m` as an element of `fin (m + 1)`;
* `fin.div_nat i` : divides `i : fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `fin.mod_nat i` : takes the mod of `i : fin (m * n)` by `n`;
### Misc definitions
* `fin.last n` : The greatest value of `fin (n+1)`.
* `fin.rev : fin n → fin n` : the antitone involution given by `i ↦ n-(i+1)`
-/
universes u v
open fin nat function
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def fin_zero_elim {α : fin 0 → Sort u} (x : fin 0) : α x := x.elim0
namespace fin
/-- A non-dependent variant of `elim0`. -/
def elim0' {α : Sort*} (x : fin 0) : α := x.elim0
variables {n m : ℕ} {a b : fin n}
instance fin_to_nat (n : ℕ) : has_coe (fin n) nat := ⟨fin.val⟩
lemma val_injective : function.injective (@fin.val n) := @fin.eq_of_veq n
protected lemma prop (a : fin n) : a.val < n := a.2
@[simp] lemma is_lt (a : fin n) : (a : ℕ) < n := a.2
protected lemma pos (i : fin n) : 0 < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) i.is_lt
lemma pos_iff_nonempty {n : ℕ} : 0 < n ↔ nonempty (fin n) := ⟨λ h, ⟨⟨0, h⟩⟩, λ ⟨i⟩, i.pos⟩
/-- Equivalence between `fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equiv_subtype : fin n ≃ { i // i < n } :=
{ to_fun := λ a, ⟨a.1, a.2⟩, inv_fun := λ a, ⟨a.1, a.2⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨_, _⟩, rfl, right_inv := λ ⟨_, _⟩, rfl }
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
@[simp] protected lemma eta (a : fin n) (h : (a : ℕ) < n) : (⟨(a : ℕ), h⟩ : fin n) = a :=
by cases a; refl
@[ext]
lemma ext {a b : fin n} (h : (a : ℕ) = b) : a = b := eq_of_veq h
lemma ext_iff {a b : fin n} : a = b ↔ (a : ℕ) = b :=
iff.intro (congr_arg _) fin.eq_of_veq
lemma coe_injective {n : ℕ} : injective (coe : fin n → ℕ) := fin.val_injective
lemma coe_eq_coe (a b : fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
ext_iff.symm
lemma eq_iff_veq (a b : fin n) : a = b ↔ a.1 = b.1 :=
⟨veq_of_eq, eq_of_veq⟩
lemma ne_iff_vne (a b : fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
⟨vne_of_ne, ne_of_vne⟩
@[simp, nolint simp_nf] -- built-in reduction doesn't always work
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
ext_iff
protected lemma mk.inj_iff {n a b : ℕ} {ha : a < n} {hb : b < n} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : fin n) = ⟨b, hb⟩ ↔ a = b :=
eq_iff_veq _ _
lemma mk_val {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n) : (⟨m, h⟩ : fin n).val = m := rfl
lemma eq_mk_iff_coe_eq {k : ℕ} {hk : k < n} : a = ⟨k, hk⟩ ↔ (a : ℕ) = k :=
fin.eq_iff_veq a ⟨k, hk⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n) : ((⟨m, h⟩ : fin n) : ℕ) = m := rfl
lemma mk_coe (i : fin n) : (⟨i, i.property⟩ : fin n) = i :=
fin.eta _ _
lemma coe_eq_val (a : fin n) : (a : ℕ) = a.val := rfl
@[simp] lemma val_eq_coe (a : fin n) : a.val = a := rfl
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `fin k` and `fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected lemma heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : fin k → α} {g : fin l → α} :
f == g ↔ (∀ (i : fin k), f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩) :=
by { subst h, simp [function.funext_iff] }
protected lemma heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : fin k} {j : fin l} :
i == j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) :=
by { subst h, simp [coe_eq_coe] }
lemma exists_iff {p : fin n → Prop} : (∃ i, p i) ↔ ∃ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ :=
⟨λ h, exists.elim h (λ ⟨i, hi⟩ hpi, ⟨i, hi, hpi⟩),
λ h, exists.elim h (λ i hi, ⟨⟨i, hi.fst⟩, hi.snd⟩)⟩
lemma forall_iff {p : fin n → Prop} : (∀ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ :=
⟨λ h i hi, h ⟨i, hi⟩, λ h ⟨i, hi⟩, h i hi⟩
end coe
section order
/-!
### order
-/
lemma is_le (i : fin (n + 1)) : (i : ℕ) ≤ n := le_of_lt_succ i.is_lt
@[simp] lemma is_le' : (a : ℕ) ≤ n := le_of_lt a.is_lt
lemma lt_iff_coe_lt_coe : a < b ↔ (a : ℕ) < b := iff.rfl
lemma le_iff_coe_le_coe : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b := iff.rfl
lemma mk_lt_of_lt_coe {a : ℕ} (h : a < b) : (⟨a, h.trans b.is_lt⟩ : fin n) < b := h
lemma mk_le_of_le_coe {a : ℕ} (h : a ≤ b) : (⟨a, h.trans_lt b.is_lt⟩ : fin n) ≤ b := h
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
iff.rfl
instance {n : ℕ} : linear_order (fin n) :=
@linear_order.lift (fin n) _ _ ⟨λ x y, ⟨max x y, max_rec' (< n) x.2 y.2⟩⟩
⟨λ x y, ⟨min x y, min_rec' (< n) x.2 y.2⟩⟩ fin.val fin.val_injective (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
@[simp] lemma mk_le_mk {x y : nat} {hx} {hy} : (⟨x, hx⟩ : fin n) ≤ ⟨y, hy⟩ ↔ x ≤ y := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_mk {x y : nat} {hx} {hy} : (⟨x, hx⟩ : fin n) < ⟨y, hy⟩ ↔ x < y := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma min_coe : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
@[simp] lemma max_coe : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
instance {n : ℕ} : partial_order (fin n) := by apply_instance
lemma coe_strict_mono : strict_mono (coe : fin n → ℕ) := λ _ _, id
/-- The equivalence `fin n ≃ { i // i < n }` is an order isomorphism. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def order_iso_subtype : fin n ≃o { i // i < n } :=
equiv_subtype.to_order_iso (by simp [monotone]) (by simp [monotone])
/-- The inclusion map `fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps apply]
def coe_embedding : fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨coe, coe_injective⟩
@[simp] lemma equiv_subtype_symm_trans_val_embedding :
equiv_subtype.symm.to_embedding.trans coe_embedding = embedding.subtype (< n) :=
rfl
/-- The inclusion map `fin n → ℕ` is an order embedding. -/
@[simps apply]
def coe_order_embedding (n) : (fin n) ↪o ℕ :=
⟨coe_embedding, λ a b, iff.rfl⟩
/-- The ordering on `fin n` is a well order. -/
instance fin.lt.is_well_order (n) : is_well_order (fin n) (<) :=
(coe_order_embedding n).is_well_order
/-- Use the ordering on `fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `has_well_founded` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : has_well_founded (fin n) :=
⟨_, measure_wf coe⟩
instance has_zero_of_ne_zero [ne_zero n] : has_zero (fin n) :=
⟨⟨0, ne_zero.pos _⟩⟩
/-- Given a positive `n`, `fin.of_nat' i` is `i % n` as an element of `fin n`. -/
def of_nat' [ne_zero n] (i : ℕ) : fin n := ⟨i%n, mod_lt _ $ ne_zero.pos n⟩
instance has_one_of_ne_zero [ne_zero n] : has_one (fin n) :=
⟨of_nat' 1⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_zero (n : ℕ) [ne_zero n] : ((0 : fin n) : ℕ) = 0 := rfl
attribute [simp] val_zero
@[simp] lemma val_zero' (n) [ne_zero n] : (0 : fin n).val = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_zero [ne_zero n] :
(⟨0, nat.pos_of_ne_zero (ne_zero.ne n)⟩ : fin n) = (0 : fin _) := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_le [ne_zero n] (a : fin n) : 0 ≤ a := zero_le a.1
lemma zero_lt_one : (0 : fin (n + 2)) < 1 := nat.zero_lt_one
@[simp] lemma not_lt_zero (a : fin n.succ) : ¬a < 0.
lemma pos_iff_ne_zero [ne_zero n] (a : fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
by rw [← coe_fin_lt, coe_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero, ne.def, ne.def, ext_iff, coe_zero]
lemma eq_zero_or_eq_succ {n : ℕ} (i : fin (n+1)) : i = 0 ∨ ∃ j : fin n, i = j.succ :=
begin
rcases i with ⟨_|j, h⟩,
{ left, refl, },
{ right, exact ⟨⟨j, nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩, rfl⟩, }
end
lemma eq_succ_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {i : fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : ∃ j : fin n, i = j.succ :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_succ i).resolve_left hi
/-- The antitone involution `fin n → fin n` given by `i ↦ n-(i+1)`. -/
def rev : equiv.perm (fin n) :=
involutive.to_perm (λ i, ⟨n - (i + 1), tsub_lt_self i.pos (nat.succ_pos _)⟩) $
λ i, ext $ by rw [coe_mk, coe_mk, ← tsub_tsub,
tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (nat.add_one_le_iff.2 i.is_lt), add_tsub_cancel_right]
@[simp] lemma coe_rev (i : fin n) : (i.rev : ℕ) = n - (i + 1) := rfl
lemma rev_involutive : involutive (@rev n) := involutive.to_perm_involutive _
lemma rev_injective : injective (@rev n) := rev_involutive.injective
lemma rev_surjective : surjective (@rev n) := rev_involutive.surjective
lemma rev_bijective : bijective (@rev n) := rev_involutive.bijective
@[simp] lemma rev_inj {i j : fin n} : i.rev = j.rev ↔ i = j := rev_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma rev_rev (i : fin n) : i.rev.rev = i := rev_involutive _
@[simp] lemma rev_symm : (@rev n).symm = rev := rfl
lemma rev_eq {n a : ℕ} (i : fin (n+1)) (h : n=a+i) :
i.rev = ⟨a, nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr (nat.le.intro (h.symm))⟩ :=
begin
ext,
dsimp,
conv_lhs { congr, rw h, },
rw [add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_right],
end
@[simp] lemma rev_le_rev {i j : fin n} : i.rev ≤ j.rev ↔ j ≤ i :=
by simp only [le_iff_coe_le_coe, coe_rev, tsub_le_tsub_iff_left (nat.add_one_le_iff.2 j.is_lt),
add_le_add_iff_right]
@[simp] lemma rev_lt_rev {i j : fin n} : i.rev < j.rev ↔ j < i :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le rev_le_rev
/-- `fin.rev n` as an order-reversing isomorphism. -/
@[simps apply to_equiv] def rev_order_iso {n} : (fin n)ᵒᵈ ≃o fin n :=
⟨order_dual.of_dual.trans rev, λ i j, rev_le_rev⟩
@[simp] lemma rev_order_iso_symm_apply (i : fin n) :
rev_order_iso.symm i = order_dual.to_dual i.rev := rfl
/-- The greatest value of `fin (n+1)` -/
def last (n : ℕ) : fin (n+1) := ⟨_, n.lt_succ_self⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_last (n : ℕ) : (last n : ℕ) = n := rfl
lemma last_val (n : ℕ) : (last n).val = n := rfl
theorem le_last (i : fin (n+1)) : i ≤ last n :=
le_of_lt_succ i.is_lt
instance : bounded_order (fin (n+1)) :=
{ top := last n,
le_top := le_last,
bot := 0,
bot_le := zero_le }
instance : lattice (fin (n + 1)) := linear_order.to_lattice
lemma last_pos : (0 : fin (n + 2)) < last (n + 1) :=
by simp [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe]
lemma eq_last_of_not_lt {i : fin (n+1)} (h : ¬ (i : ℕ) < n) : i = last n :=
le_antisymm (le_last i) (not_lt.1 h)
lemma top_eq_last (n : ℕ) : ⊤ = fin.last n := rfl
lemma bot_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : ⊥ = (0 : fin (n+1)) := rfl
section
variables {α : Type*} [preorder α]
open set
/-- If `e` is an `order_iso` between `fin n` and `fin m`, then `n = m` and `e` is the identity
map. In this lemma we state that for each `i : fin n` we have `(e i : ℕ) = (i : ℕ)`. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_order_iso_apply (e : fin n ≃o fin m) (i : fin n) : (e i : ℕ) = i :=
begin
rcases i with ⟨i, hi⟩,
rw [fin.coe_mk],
induction i using nat.strong_induction_on with i h,
refine le_antisymm (forall_lt_iff_le.1 $ λ j hj, _) (forall_lt_iff_le.1 $ λ j hj, _),
{ have := e.symm.lt_iff_lt.2 (mk_lt_of_lt_coe hj),
rw e.symm_apply_apply at this,
convert this,
simpa using h _ this (e.symm _).is_lt },
{ rwa [← h j hj (hj.trans hi), ← lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, e.lt_iff_lt] }
end
instance order_iso_subsingleton : subsingleton (fin n ≃o α) :=
⟨λ e e', by { ext i,
rw [← e.symm.apply_eq_iff_eq, e.symm_apply_apply, ← e'.trans_apply, ext_iff,
coe_order_iso_apply] }⟩
instance order_iso_subsingleton' : subsingleton (α ≃o fin n) :=
order_iso.symm_injective.subsingleton
instance order_iso_unique : unique (fin n ≃o fin n) := unique.mk' _
/-- Two strictly monotone functions from `fin n` are equal provided that their ranges
are equal. -/
lemma strict_mono_unique {f g : fin n → α} (hf : strict_mono f) (hg : strict_mono g)
(h : range f = range g) : f = g :=
have (hf.order_iso f).trans (order_iso.set_congr _ _ h) = hg.order_iso g,
from subsingleton.elim _ _,
congr_arg (function.comp (coe : range g → α)) (funext $ rel_iso.ext_iff.1 this)
/-- Two order embeddings of `fin n` are equal provided that their ranges are equal. -/
lemma order_embedding_eq {f g : fin n ↪o α} (h : range f = range g) : f = g :=
rel_embedding.ext $ funext_iff.1 $ strict_mono_unique f.strict_mono g.strict_mono h
end
end order
section add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from nat
-/
lemma one_val {n : ℕ} : (1 : fin (n+1)).val = 1 % (n+1) := rfl
lemma coe_one' (n : ℕ) [ne_zero n] : ((1 : fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n := rfl
@[simp] lemma val_one (n : ℕ) : (1 : fin (n+2)).val = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one (n : ℕ) : ((1 : fin (n+2)) : ℕ) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_one : (⟨1, nat.succ_lt_succ (nat.succ_pos n)⟩ : fin (n + 2)) = (1 : fin _) := rfl
instance {n : ℕ} : nontrivial (fin (n + 2)) := ⟨⟨0, 1, dec_trivial⟩⟩
lemma nontrivial_iff_two_le : nontrivial (fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n :=
by rcases n with _|_|n; simp [fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, nat.succ_le_iff]
lemma subsingleton_iff_le_one : subsingleton (fin n) ↔ n ≤ 1 :=
by rcases n with _|_|n; simp [is_empty.subsingleton, unique.subsingleton, not_subsingleton]
section monoid
@[simp] protected lemma add_zero [ne_zero n] (k : fin n) : k + 0 = k :=
by simp [eq_iff_veq, add_def, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt k)]
@[simp] protected lemma zero_add [ne_zero n] (k : fin n) : (0 : fin n) + k = k :=
by simp [eq_iff_veq, add_def, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt k)]
instance add_comm_monoid (n : ℕ) [ne_zero n] : add_comm_monoid (fin n) :=
{ add := (+),
add_assoc := by simp [eq_iff_veq, add_def, add_assoc],
zero := 0,
zero_add := fin.zero_add,
add_zero := fin.add_zero,
add_comm := by simp [eq_iff_veq, add_def, add_comm] }
instance [ne_zero n] : add_monoid_with_one (fin n) :=
{ one := 1,
nat_cast := fin.of_nat',
nat_cast_zero := rfl,
nat_cast_succ := λ i, eq_of_veq (add_mod _ _ _),
.. fin.add_comm_monoid n }
end monoid
lemma val_add {n : ℕ} : ∀ a b : fin n, (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
lemma coe_add {n : ℕ} : ∀ a b : fin n, ((a + b : fin n) : ℕ) = (a + b) % n
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
lemma coe_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b :=
by rw [fin.coe_add, nat.add_mod_eq_ite,
nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n, from a.2), nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n, from b.2)]
lemma coe_bit0 {n : ℕ} (k : fin n) : ((bit0 k : fin n) : ℕ) = bit0 (k : ℕ) % n :=
by { cases k, refl }
lemma coe_bit1 {n : ℕ} [ne_zero n] (k : fin n) :
((bit1 k : fin n) : ℕ) = bit1 (k : ℕ) % n :=
by simp [bit1, coe_add, coe_bit0, coe_one']
lemma coe_add_one_of_lt {n : ℕ} {i : fin n.succ} (h : i < last _) :
(↑(i + 1) : ℕ) = i + 1 :=
begin
-- First show that `((1 : fin n.succ) : ℕ) = 1`, because `n.succ` is at least 2.
cases n,
{ cases h },
-- Then just unfold the definitions.
rw [fin.coe_add, fin.coe_one, nat.mod_eq_of_lt (nat.succ_lt_succ _)],
exact h
end
@[simp] lemma last_add_one : ∀ n, last n + 1 = 0
| 0 := subsingleton.elim _ _
| (n + 1) := by { ext, rw [coe_add, coe_zero, coe_last, coe_one, nat.mod_self] }
lemma coe_add_one {n : ℕ} (i : fin (n + 1)) :
((i + 1 : fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = if i = last _ then 0 else i + 1 :=
begin
rcases (le_last i).eq_or_lt with rfl|h,
{ simp },
{ simpa [h.ne] using coe_add_one_of_lt h }
end
section bit
@[simp] lemma mk_bit0 {m n : ℕ} (h : bit0 m < n) :
(⟨bit0 m, h⟩ : fin n) = (bit0 ⟨m, (nat.le_add_right m m).trans_lt h⟩ : fin _) :=
eq_of_veq (nat.mod_eq_of_lt h).symm
@[simp] lemma mk_bit1 {m n : ℕ} [ne_zero n] (h : bit1 m < n) :
(⟨bit1 m, h⟩ : fin n) = (bit1 ⟨m, (nat.le_add_right m m).trans_lt
((m + m).lt_succ_self.trans h)⟩ : fin _) :=
begin
ext,
simp only [bit1, bit0] at h,
simp only [bit1, bit0, coe_add, coe_one', coe_mk, ←nat.add_mod, nat.mod_eq_of_lt h],
end
end bit
@[simp] lemma val_two {n : ℕ} : (2 : fin (n+3)).val = 2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_two {n : ℕ} : ((2 : fin (n+3)) : ℕ) = 2 := rfl
section of_nat_coe
@[simp]
lemma of_nat_eq_coe (n : ℕ) (a : ℕ) : (of_nat a : fin (n+1)) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma of_nat'_eq_coe (n : ℕ) [ne_zero n] (a : ℕ) : (of_nat' a : fin n) = a :=
rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `fin n` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
lemma coe_val_of_lt {n : ℕ} [ne_zero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) :
((a : fin n).val) = a :=
begin
rw ←of_nat'_eq_coe,
exact nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
end
/-- Converting the value of a `fin n` to `fin n` results
in the same value. -/
lemma coe_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [ne_zero n] (a : fin n) : (a.val : fin n) = a :=
begin
rw fin.eq_iff_veq,
exact coe_val_of_lt a.property
end
/-- Coercing an in-range number to `fin n`, and converting back
to `ℕ`, results in that number. -/
lemma coe_coe_of_lt {n : ℕ} [ne_zero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) :
((a : fin n) : ℕ) = a :=
coe_val_of_lt h
/-- Converting a `fin n` to `ℕ` and back results in the same
value. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_coe_eq_self {n : ℕ} [ne_zero n] (a : fin n) : ((a : ℕ) : fin n) = a :=
coe_val_eq_self a
lemma coe_nat_eq_last (n) : (n : fin (n + 1)) = fin.last n :=
by { rw [←fin.of_nat_eq_coe, fin.of_nat, fin.last], simp only [nat.mod_eq_of_lt n.lt_succ_self] }
lemma le_coe_last (i : fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n :=
by { rw fin.coe_nat_eq_last, exact fin.le_last i }
end of_nat_coe
lemma add_one_pos (i : fin (n + 1)) (h : i < fin.last n) : (0 : fin (n + 1)) < i + 1 :=
begin
cases n,
{ exact absurd h (nat.not_lt_zero _) },
{ rw [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, coe_last, ←add_lt_add_iff_right 1] at h,
rw [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, coe_add, coe_zero, coe_one, nat.mod_eq_of_lt h],
exact nat.zero_lt_succ _ }
end
lemma one_pos : (0 : fin (n + 2)) < 1 := succ_pos 0
lemma zero_ne_one : (0 : fin (n + 2)) ≠ 1 := ne_of_lt one_pos
@[simp] lemma zero_eq_one_iff [ne_zero n]: (0 : fin n) = 1 ↔ n = 1 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have := congr_arg (coe : fin n → ℕ) h,
simp only [fin.coe_zero, ← nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, fin.coe_one', @eq_comm _ 0] at this,
exact eq_one_of_dvd_one this },
{ unfreezingI { rintro rfl }, refl }
end
@[simp] lemma one_eq_zero_iff [ne_zero n]: (1 : fin n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 :=
by rw [eq_comm, zero_eq_one_iff]
end add
section succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger fin types
-/
@[simp] lemma coe_succ (j : fin n) : (j.succ : ℕ) = j + 1 :=
by cases j; simp [fin.succ]
@[simp]
lemma succ_pos (a : fin n) : (0 : fin (n + 1)) < a.succ := by simp [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe]
/-- `fin.succ` as an `order_embedding` -/
def succ_embedding (n : ℕ) : fin n ↪o fin (n + 1) :=
order_embedding.of_strict_mono fin.succ $ λ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ h, succ_lt_succ h
@[simp] lemma coe_succ_embedding : ⇑(succ_embedding n) = fin.succ := rfl
@[simp] lemma succ_le_succ_iff : a.succ ≤ b.succ ↔ a ≤ b :=
(succ_embedding n).le_iff_le
@[simp] lemma succ_lt_succ_iff : a.succ < b.succ ↔ a < b :=
(succ_embedding n).lt_iff_lt
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : injective (@fin.succ n) :=
(succ_embedding n).injective
@[simp] lemma succ_inj {a b : fin n} : a.succ = b.succ ↔ a = b :=
(succ_injective n).eq_iff
lemma succ_ne_zero {n} : ∀ k : fin n, fin.succ k ≠ 0
| ⟨k, hk⟩ heq := nat.succ_ne_zero k $ ext_iff.1 heq
@[simp] lemma succ_zero_eq_one [ne_zero n] : fin.succ (0 : fin n) = 1 :=
begin
unfreezingI { cases n },
{ exact (ne_zero.ne 0 rfl).elim },
{ refl }
end
/-- Version of `succ_zero_eq_one` to be used by `dsimp` -/
@[simp] lemma succ_zero_eq_one' : fin.succ (0 : fin (n+1)) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma succ_one_eq_two [ne_zero n] : fin.succ (1 : fin (n + 1)) = 2 :=
begin
unfreezingI { cases n },
{ exact (ne_zero.ne 0 rfl).elim },
{ refl }
end
/-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp` -/
@[simp] lemma succ_one_eq_two' : fin.succ (1 : fin (n + 2)) = 2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma succ_mk (n i : ℕ) (h : i < n) : fin.succ ⟨i, h⟩ = ⟨i + 1, nat.succ_lt_succ h⟩ :=
rfl
lemma mk_succ_pos (i : ℕ) (h : i < n) : (0 : fin (n + 1)) < ⟨i.succ, add_lt_add_right h 1⟩ :=
by { rw [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, coe_zero], exact nat.succ_pos i }
lemma one_lt_succ_succ (a : fin n) : (1 : fin (n + 2)) < a.succ.succ :=
begin
cases n,
{ exact fin_zero_elim a },
{ rw [←succ_zero_eq_one, succ_lt_succ_iff], exact succ_pos a }
end
@[simp] lemma add_one_lt_iff {n : ℕ} {k : fin (n + 2)} :
k + 1 < k ↔ k = last _ :=
begin
simp only [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, coe_add, coe_last, ext_iff],
cases k with k hk,
rcases (le_of_lt_succ hk).eq_or_lt with rfl|hk',
{ simp },
{ simp [hk'.ne, mod_eq_of_lt (succ_lt_succ hk'), le_succ _] }
end
@[simp] lemma add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {k : fin (n + 1)} :
k + 1 ≤ k ↔ k = last _ :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp [subsingleton.elim (k + 1) k, subsingleton.elim (fin.last _) k] },
rw [←not_iff_not, ←add_one_lt_iff, lt_iff_le_and_ne, not_and'],
refine ⟨λ h _, h, λ h, h _⟩,
rw [ne.def, ext_iff, coe_add_one],
split_ifs with hk hk;
simp [hk, eq_comm],
end
@[simp] lemma last_le_iff {n : ℕ} {k : fin (n + 1)} :
last n ≤ k ↔ k = last n :=
top_le_iff
@[simp] lemma lt_add_one_iff {n : ℕ} {k : fin (n + 1)} :
k < k + 1 ↔ k < last n :=
begin
rw ←not_iff_not,
simp
end
@[simp] lemma le_zero_iff {n : ℕ} [ne_zero n] {k : fin n} :
k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨λ h, fin.eq_of_veq $ by rw [nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; refl, by rintro rfl; refl⟩
lemma succ_succ_ne_one (a : fin n) : fin.succ (fin.succ a) ≠ 1 := ne_of_gt (one_lt_succ_succ a)
/-- `cast_lt i h` embeds `i` into a `fin` where `h` proves it belongs into. -/
def cast_lt (i : fin m) (h : i.1 < n) : fin n := ⟨i.1, h⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_lt (i : fin m) (h : i.1 < n) : (cast_lt i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_lt_mk (i n m : ℕ) (hn : i < n) (hm : i < m) : cast_lt ⟨i, hn⟩ hm = ⟨i, hm⟩ := rfl
/-- `cast_le h i` embeds `i` into a larger `fin` type. -/
def cast_le (h : n ≤ m) : fin n ↪o fin m :=
order_embedding.of_strict_mono (λ a, cast_lt a (lt_of_lt_of_le a.2 h)) $ λ a b h, h
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_le (h : n ≤ m) (i : fin n) : (cast_le h i : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_le_mk (i n m : ℕ) (hn : i < n) (h : n ≤ m) :
cast_le h ⟨i, hn⟩ = ⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le hn h⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_le_zero {n m : ℕ} (h : n.succ ≤ m.succ) :
cast_le h 0 = 0 :=
by simp [eq_iff_veq]
@[simp] lemma range_cast_le {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) :
set.range (cast_le h) = {i | (i : ℕ) < n} :=
set.ext (λ x, ⟨λ ⟨y, hy⟩, hy ▸ y.2, λ hx, ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, fin.ext rfl⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma coe_of_injective_cast_le_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : fin k) (hi) :
((equiv.of_injective _ (cast_le h).injective).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i :=
begin
rw ← coe_cast_le,
exact congr_arg coe (equiv.apply_of_injective_symm _ _)
end
@[simp] lemma cast_le_succ {m n : ℕ} (h : (m + 1) ≤ (n + 1)) (i : fin m) :
cast_le h i.succ = (cast_le (nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp h) i).succ :=
by simp [fin.eq_iff_veq]
@[simp] lemma cast_le_cast_le {k m n} (km : k ≤ m) (mn : m ≤ n) (i : fin k) :
fin.cast_le mn (fin.cast_le km i) = fin.cast_le (km.trans mn) i :=
fin.ext (by simp only [coe_cast_le])
@[simp] lemma cast_le_comp_cast_le {k m n} (km : k ≤ m) (mn : m ≤ n) :
fin.cast_le mn ∘ fin.cast_le km = fin.cast_le (km.trans mn) :=
funext (cast_le_cast_le km mn)
/-- `cast eq i` embeds `i` into a equal `fin` type, see also `equiv.fin_congr`. -/
def cast (eq : n = m) : fin n ≃o fin m :=
{ to_equiv := ⟨cast_le eq.le, cast_le eq.symm.le, λ a, eq_of_veq rfl, λ a, eq_of_veq rfl⟩,
map_rel_iff' := λ a b, iff.rfl }
@[simp] lemma symm_cast (h : n = m) : (cast h).symm = cast h.symm := rfl
/-- While `fin.coe_order_iso_apply` is a more general case of this, we mark this `simp` anyway
as it is eligible for `dsimp`. -/
@[simp]
lemma coe_cast (h : n = m) (i : fin n) : (cast h i : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_zero {n' : ℕ} [ne_zero n] {h : n = n'} :
cast h (0 : fin n) = by { haveI : ne_zero n' := by { rw ← h; apply_instance }, exact 0 } :=
ext rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_last {n' : ℕ} {h : n + 1 = n' + 1} :
cast h (last n) = last n' :=
ext (by rw [coe_cast, coe_last, coe_last, nat.succ_injective h])
@[simp] lemma cast_mk (h : n = m) (i : ℕ) (hn : i < n) :
cast h ⟨i, hn⟩ = ⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le hn h.le⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_trans {k : ℕ} (h : n = m) (h' : m = k) {i : fin n} :
cast h' (cast h i) = cast (eq.trans h h') i := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : cast h = order_iso.refl (fin n) :=
by { ext, refl }
lemma cast_le_of_eq {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) {h' : m ≤ n} :
(cast_le h' : fin m → fin n) = fin.cast h :=
funext (λ _, rfl)
/-- While in many cases `fin.cast` is better than `equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma cast_to_equiv (h : n = m) : (cast h).to_equiv = equiv.cast (h ▸ rfl) :=
by { subst h, simp }
/-- While in many cases `fin.cast` is better than `equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (cast h : fin n → fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) :=
by { subst h, ext, simp }
/-- `cast_add m i` embeds `i : fin n` in `fin (n+m)`. See also `fin.nat_add` and `fin.add_nat`. -/
def cast_add (m) : fin n ↪o fin (n + m) := cast_le $ nat.le_add_right n m
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_add (m : ℕ) (i : fin n) : (cast_add m i : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_add_zero : (cast_add 0 : fin n → fin (n + 0)) = cast rfl := rfl
lemma cast_add_lt {m : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (i : fin m) : (cast_add n i : ℕ) < m := i.2
@[simp] lemma cast_add_mk (m : ℕ) (i : ℕ) (h : i < n) :
cast_add m ⟨i, h⟩ = ⟨i, lt_add_right i n m h⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_add_cast_lt (m : ℕ) (i : fin (n + m)) (hi : i.val < n) :
cast_add m (cast_lt i hi) = i :=
ext rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_lt_cast_add (m : ℕ) (i : fin n) :
cast_lt (cast_add m i) (cast_add_lt m i) = i :=
ext rfl
/-- For rewriting in the reverse direction, see `fin.cast_cast_add_left`. -/
lemma cast_add_cast {n n' : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (i : fin n') (h : n' = n) :
cast_add m (fin.cast h i) = fin.cast (congr_arg _ h) (cast_add m i) :=
ext rfl
lemma cast_cast_add_left {n n' m : ℕ} (i : fin n') (h : n' + m = n + m) :
cast h (cast_add m i) = cast_add m (cast (add_right_cancel h) i) :=
ext rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_cast_add_right {n m m' : ℕ} (i : fin n) (h : n + m' = n + m) :
cast h (cast_add m' i) = cast_add m i :=
ext rfl
lemma cast_add_cast_add {m n p : ℕ} (i : fin m) :
cast_add p (cast_add n i) = cast (add_assoc _ _ _).symm (cast_add (n + p) i) :=
ext rfl
/-- The cast of the successor is the succesor of the cast. See `fin.succ_cast_eq` for rewriting in
the reverse direction. -/
@[simp] lemma cast_succ_eq {n' : ℕ} (i : fin n) (h : n.succ = n'.succ) :
cast h i.succ = (cast (nat.succ.inj h) i).succ :=
ext $ by simp
lemma succ_cast_eq {n' : ℕ} (i : fin n) (h : n = n') : (cast h i).succ = cast (by rw h) i.succ :=
ext $ by simp
/-- `cast_succ i` embeds `i : fin n` in `fin (n+1)`. -/
def cast_succ : fin n ↪o fin (n + 1) := cast_add 1
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_succ (i : fin n) : (i.cast_succ : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_succ_mk (n i : ℕ) (h : i < n) : cast_succ ⟨i, h⟩ = ⟨i, nat.lt.step h⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_cast_succ {n' : ℕ} {h : n + 1 = n' + 1} {i : fin n} :
cast h (cast_succ i) = cast_succ (cast (nat.succ_injective h) i) :=
by { ext, simp only [coe_cast, coe_cast_succ] }
lemma cast_succ_lt_succ (i : fin n) : i.cast_succ < i.succ :=
lt_iff_coe_lt_coe.2 $ by simp only [coe_cast_succ, coe_succ, nat.lt_succ_self]
lemma le_cast_succ_iff {i : fin (n + 1)} {j : fin n} : i ≤ j.cast_succ ↔ i < j.succ :=
by simpa [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, le_iff_coe_le_coe] using nat.succ_le_succ_iff.symm
lemma cast_succ_lt_iff_succ_le {n : ℕ} {i : fin n} {j : fin (n+1)} :
i.cast_succ < j ↔ i.succ ≤ j :=
by simpa only [fin.lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, fin.le_iff_coe_le_coe, fin.coe_succ, fin.coe_cast_succ]
using nat.lt_iff_add_one_le
@[simp] lemma succ_last (n : ℕ) : (last n).succ = last (n.succ) := rfl
@[simp] lemma succ_eq_last_succ {n : ℕ} (i : fin n.succ) :
i.succ = last (n + 1) ↔ i = last n :=
by rw [← succ_last, (succ_injective _).eq_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_succ_cast_lt (i : fin (n + 1)) (h : (i : ℕ) < n) : cast_succ (cast_lt i h) = i :=
fin.eq_of_veq rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_lt_cast_succ {n : ℕ} (a : fin n) (h : (a : ℕ) < n) :
cast_lt (cast_succ a) h = a :=
by cases a; refl
@[simp] lemma cast_succ_lt_cast_succ_iff : a.cast_succ < b.cast_succ ↔ a < b :=
(@cast_succ n).lt_iff_lt
lemma cast_succ_injective (n : ℕ) : injective (@fin.cast_succ n) :=
(cast_succ : fin n ↪o _).injective
lemma cast_succ_inj {a b : fin n} : a.cast_succ = b.cast_succ ↔ a = b :=
(cast_succ_injective n).eq_iff
lemma cast_succ_lt_last (a : fin n) : cast_succ a < last n := lt_iff_coe_lt_coe.mpr a.is_lt
@[simp] lemma cast_succ_zero [ne_zero n] : cast_succ (0 : fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_succ_one {n : ℕ} : fin.cast_succ (1 : fin (n + 2)) = 1 := rfl
/-- `cast_succ i` is positive when `i` is positive -/
lemma cast_succ_pos [ne_zero n] {i : fin n} (h : 0 < i) : 0 < cast_succ i :=
by simpa [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe] using h
@[simp] lemma cast_succ_eq_zero_iff [ne_zero n] (a : fin n) : a.cast_succ = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
fin.ext_iff.trans $ (fin.ext_iff.trans $ by exact iff.rfl).symm
lemma cast_succ_ne_zero_iff [ne_zero n] (a : fin n) : a.cast_succ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr $ cast_succ_eq_zero_iff a
lemma cast_succ_fin_succ (n : ℕ) (j : fin n) :
cast_succ (fin.succ j) = fin.succ (cast_succ j) :=
by simp [fin.ext_iff]
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_eq_cast_succ : (a : fin (n + 1)) = a.cast_succ :=
begin
ext,
exact coe_val_of_lt (nat.lt.step a.is_lt),
end
@[simp] lemma coe_succ_eq_succ : a.cast_succ + 1 = a.succ :=
begin
cases n,
{ exact fin_zero_elim a },
{ simp [a.is_lt, eq_iff_veq, add_def, nat.mod_eq_of_lt] }
end
lemma lt_succ : a.cast_succ < a.succ :=
by { rw [cast_succ, lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, coe_cast_add, coe_succ], exact lt_add_one a.val }
@[simp] lemma range_cast_succ {n : ℕ} :
set.range (cast_succ : fin n → fin n.succ) = {i | (i : ℕ) < n} :=
range_cast_le _
@[simp] lemma coe_of_injective_cast_succ_symm {n : ℕ} (i : fin (n+1)) (hi) :
((equiv.of_injective cast_succ (cast_succ_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i :=
begin
rw ← coe_cast_succ,
exact congr_arg coe (equiv.apply_of_injective_symm _ _)
end
lemma succ_cast_succ {n : ℕ} (i : fin n) :
i.cast_succ.succ = i.succ.cast_succ :=
fin.ext (by simp)
/-- `add_nat m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `fin.succ`. -/
def add_nat (m) : fin n ↪o fin (n + m) :=
order_embedding.of_strict_mono (λ i, ⟨(i : ℕ) + m, add_lt_add_right i.2 _⟩) $
λ i j h, lt_iff_coe_lt_coe.2 $ add_lt_add_right h _
@[simp] lemma coe_add_nat (m : ℕ) (i : fin n) : (add_nat m i : ℕ) = i + m := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_nat_one {i : fin n} : add_nat 1 i = i.succ :=
by { ext, rw [coe_add_nat, coe_succ] }
lemma le_coe_add_nat (m : ℕ) (i : fin n) : m ≤ add_nat m i := nat.le_add_left _ _
@[simp] lemma add_nat_mk (n i : ℕ) (hi : i < m) :
add_nat n ⟨i, hi⟩ = ⟨i + n, add_lt_add_right hi n⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_add_nat_zero {n n' : ℕ} (i : fin n) (h : n + 0 = n') :
cast h (add_nat 0 i) = cast ((add_zero _).symm.trans h) i :=
ext $ add_zero _
/-- For rewriting in the reverse direction, see `fin.cast_add_nat_left`. -/
lemma add_nat_cast {n n' m : ℕ} (i : fin n') (h : n' = n) :
add_nat m (cast h i) = cast (congr_arg _ h) (add_nat m i) :=
ext rfl
lemma cast_add_nat_left {n n' m : ℕ} (i : fin n') (h : n' + m = n + m) :
cast h (add_nat m i) = add_nat m (cast (add_right_cancel h) i) :=
ext rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_add_nat_right {n m m' : ℕ} (i : fin n) (h : n + m' = n + m) :
cast h (add_nat m' i) = add_nat m i :=
ext $ (congr_arg ((+) (i : ℕ)) (add_left_cancel h) : _)
/-- `nat_add n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
def nat_add (n) {m} : fin m ↪o fin (n + m) :=
order_embedding.of_strict_mono (λ i, ⟨n + (i : ℕ), add_lt_add_left i.2 _⟩) $
λ i j h, lt_iff_coe_lt_coe.2 $ add_lt_add_left h _
@[simp] lemma coe_nat_add (n : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (i : fin m) : (nat_add n i : ℕ) = n + i := rfl
@[simp] lemma nat_add_mk (n i : ℕ) (hi : i < m) :
nat_add n ⟨i, hi⟩ = ⟨n + i, add_lt_add_left hi n⟩ := rfl
lemma le_coe_nat_add (m : ℕ) (i : fin n) : m ≤ nat_add m i := nat.le_add_right _ _
lemma nat_add_zero {n : ℕ} : fin.nat_add 0 = (fin.cast (zero_add n).symm).to_rel_embedding :=
by { ext, apply zero_add }
/-- For rewriting in the reverse direction, see `fin.cast_nat_add_right`. -/
lemma nat_add_cast {n n' : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (i : fin n') (h : n' = n) :
nat_add m (cast h i) = cast (congr_arg _ h) (nat_add m i) :=
ext rfl
lemma cast_nat_add_right {n n' m : ℕ} (i : fin n') (h : m + n' = m + n) :
cast h (nat_add m i) = nat_add m (cast (add_left_cancel h) i) :=
ext rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_nat_add_left {n m m' : ℕ} (i : fin n) (h : m' + n = m + n) :
cast h (nat_add m' i) = nat_add m i :=
ext $ (congr_arg (+ (i : ℕ)) (add_right_cancel h) : _)
lemma cast_add_nat_add (p m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (i : fin n) :
cast_add p (nat_add m i) = cast (add_assoc _ _ _).symm (nat_add m (cast_add p i)) :=
ext rfl
lemma nat_add_cast_add (p m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (i : fin n) :
nat_add m (cast_add p i) = cast (add_assoc _ _ _) (cast_add p (nat_add m i)) :=
ext rfl
lemma nat_add_nat_add (m n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (i : fin p) :
nat_add m (nat_add n i) = cast (add_assoc _ _ _) (nat_add (m + n) i) :=
ext $ (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[simp] lemma cast_nat_add_zero {n n' : ℕ} (i : fin n) (h : 0 + n = n') :
cast h (nat_add 0 i) = cast ((zero_add _).symm.trans h) i :=
ext $ zero_add _
@[simp] lemma cast_nat_add (n : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (i : fin m) :
cast (add_comm _ _) (nat_add n i) = add_nat n i :=
ext $ add_comm _ _
@[simp] lemma cast_add_nat {n : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (i : fin n) :
cast (add_comm _ _) (add_nat m i) = nat_add m i :=
ext $ add_comm _ _
@[simp] lemma nat_add_last {m n : ℕ} : nat_add n (last m) = last (n + m) := rfl
lemma nat_add_cast_succ {m n : ℕ} {i : fin m} :
nat_add n (cast_succ i) = cast_succ (nat_add n i) := rfl
end succ
section pred
/-!
### pred
-/
@[simp] lemma coe_pred (j : fin (n+1)) (h : j ≠ 0) : (j.pred h : ℕ) = j - 1 :=
by { cases j, refl }
@[simp] lemma succ_pred : ∀(i : fin (n+1)) (h : i ≠ 0), (i.pred h).succ = i
| ⟨0, h⟩ hi := by contradiction
| ⟨n + 1, h⟩ hi := rfl
@[simp] lemma pred_succ (i : fin n) {h : i.succ ≠ 0} : i.succ.pred h = i :=
by { cases i, refl }
lemma pred_eq_iff_eq_succ {n : ℕ} (i : fin (n+1)) (hi : i ≠ 0) (j : fin n) :
i.pred hi = j ↔ i = j.succ :=
⟨λ h, by simp only [← h, fin.succ_pred], λ h, by simp only [h, fin.pred_succ]⟩
@[simp] lemma pred_mk_succ (i : ℕ) (h : i < n + 1) :
fin.pred ⟨i + 1, add_lt_add_right h 1⟩ (ne_of_vne (ne_of_gt (mk_succ_pos i h))) = ⟨i, h⟩ :=
by simp only [ext_iff, coe_pred, coe_mk, add_tsub_cancel_right]
-- This is not a simp lemma by default, because `pred_mk_succ` is nicer when it applies.
lemma pred_mk {n : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (h : i < n + 1) (w) :
fin.pred ⟨i, h⟩ w =
⟨i - 1, by rwa tsub_lt_iff_right (nat.succ_le_of_lt $ nat.pos_of_ne_zero (fin.vne_of_ne w))⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma pred_le_pred_iff {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n.succ} {ha : a ≠ 0} {hb : b ≠ 0} :
a.pred ha ≤ b.pred hb ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [←succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred, succ_pred]
@[simp] lemma pred_lt_pred_iff {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n.succ} {ha : a ≠ 0} {hb : b ≠ 0} :
a.pred ha < b.pred hb ↔ a < b :=
by rw [←succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred, succ_pred]
@[simp] lemma pred_inj :
∀ {a b : fin (n + 1)} {ha : a ≠ 0} {hb : b ≠ 0}, a.pred ha = b.pred hb ↔ a = b
| ⟨0, _⟩ b ha hb := by contradiction
| ⟨i+1, _⟩ ⟨0, _⟩ ha hb := by contradiction
| ⟨i+1, hi⟩ ⟨j+1, hj⟩ ha hb := by simp [fin.eq_iff_veq]
@[simp] lemma pred_one {n : ℕ} : fin.pred (1 : fin (n + 2)) (ne.symm (ne_of_lt one_pos)) = 0 := rfl
lemma pred_add_one (i : fin (n + 2)) (h : (i : ℕ) < n + 1) :
pred (i + 1) (ne_of_gt (add_one_pos _ (lt_iff_coe_lt_coe.mpr h))) = cast_lt i h :=
begin
rw [ext_iff, coe_pred, coe_cast_lt, coe_add, coe_one, mod_eq_of_lt, add_tsub_cancel_right],
exact add_lt_add_right h 1,
end
/-- `sub_nat i h` subtracts `m` from `i`, generalizes `fin.pred`. -/
def sub_nat (m) (i : fin (n + m)) (h : m ≤ (i : ℕ)) : fin n :=
⟨(i : ℕ) - m, by { rw [tsub_lt_iff_right h], exact i.is_lt }⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_sub_nat (i : fin (n + m)) (h : m ≤ i) : (i.sub_nat m h : ℕ) = i - m :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma sub_nat_mk {i : ℕ} (h₁ : i < n + m) (h₂ : m ≤ i) :
sub_nat m ⟨i, h₁⟩ h₂ = ⟨i - m, (tsub_lt_iff_right h₂).2 h₁⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma pred_cast_succ_succ (i : fin n) :
pred (cast_succ i.succ) (ne_of_gt (cast_succ_pos i.succ_pos)) = i.cast_succ :=
by simp [eq_iff_veq]
@[simp] lemma add_nat_sub_nat {i : fin (n + m)} (h : m ≤ i) :
add_nat m (sub_nat m i h) = i :=
ext $ tsub_add_cancel_of_le h
@[simp] lemma sub_nat_add_nat (i : fin n) (m : ℕ) (h : m ≤ add_nat m i := le_coe_add_nat m i) :
sub_nat m (add_nat m i) h = i :=
ext $ add_tsub_cancel_right i m
@[simp] lemma nat_add_sub_nat_cast {i : fin (n + m)} (h : n ≤ i) :
nat_add n (sub_nat n (cast (add_comm _ _) i) h) = i :=
by simp [← cast_add_nat]
end pred
section div_mod
/-- Compute `i / n`, where `n` is a `nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def div_nat (i : fin (m * n)) : fin m :=
⟨i / n, nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul $ mul_comm m n ▸ i.prop⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_div_nat (i : fin (m * n)) : (i.div_nat : ℕ) = i / n := rfl
/-- Compute `i % n`, where `n` is a `nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def mod_nat (i : fin (m * n)) : fin n :=
⟨i % n, nat.mod_lt _ $ pos_of_mul_pos_right i.pos m.zero_le⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_mod_nat (i : fin (m * n)) : (i.mod_nat : ℕ) = i % n := rfl
end div_mod
section rec
/-!
### recursion and induction principles
-/
/-- Define `C n i` by induction on `i : fin n` interpreted as `(0 : fin (n - i)).succ.succ…`.
This function has two arguments: `H0 n` defines `0`-th element `C (n+1) 0` of an `(n+1)`-tuple,
and `Hs n i` defines `(i+1)`-st element of `(n+1)`-tuple based on `n`, `i`, and `i`-th element
of `n`-tuple. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def succ_rec
{C : Π n, fin n → Sort*}
(H0 : Π n, C (succ n) 0)
(Hs : Π n i, C n i → C (succ n) i.succ) : Π {n : ℕ} (i : fin n), C n i
| 0 i := i.elim0
| (succ n) ⟨0, _⟩ := H0 _
| (succ n) ⟨succ i, h⟩ := Hs _ _ (succ_rec ⟨i, lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩)
/-- Define `C n i` by induction on `i : fin n` interpreted as `(0 : fin (n - i)).succ.succ…`.
This function has two arguments: `H0 n` defines `0`-th element `C (n+1) 0` of an `(n+1)`-tuple,
and `Hs n i` defines `(i+1)`-st element of `(n+1)`-tuple based on `n`, `i`, and `i`-th element
of `n`-tuple.
A version of `fin.succ_rec` taking `i : fin n` as the first argument. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def succ_rec_on {n : ℕ} (i : fin n)
{C : Π n, fin n → Sort*}
(H0 : Π n, C (succ n) 0)
(Hs : Π n i, C n i → C (succ n) i.succ) : C n i :=
i.succ_rec H0 Hs
@[simp] theorem succ_rec_on_zero {C : ∀ n, fin n → Sort*} {H0 Hs} (n) :
@fin.succ_rec_on (succ n) 0 C H0 Hs = H0 n :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_rec_on_succ {C : ∀ n, fin n → Sort*} {H0 Hs} {n} (i : fin n) :
@fin.succ_rec_on (succ n) i.succ C H0 Hs = Hs n i (fin.succ_rec_on i H0 Hs) :=
by cases i; refl
/--
Define `C i` by induction on `i : fin (n + 1)` via induction on the underlying `nat` value.
This function has two arguments: `h0` handles the base case on `C 0`,
and `hs` defines the inductive step using `C i.cast_succ`.
-/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def induction
{C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*}
(h0 : C 0)
(hs : ∀ i : fin n, C i.cast_succ → C i.succ) :
Π (i : fin (n + 1)), C i :=
begin
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩,
induction i with i IH,
{ rwa [fin.mk_zero] },
{ refine hs ⟨i, lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi⟩ _,
exact IH (lt_of_succ_lt hi) }
end
@[simp] lemma induction_zero {C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*} (h0 : C 0)
(hs : ∀ i : fin n, C i.cast_succ → C i.succ) :
(induction h0 hs : _) 0 = h0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma induction_succ {C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*} (h0 : C 0)
(hs : ∀ i : fin n, C i.cast_succ → C i.succ) (i : fin n) :
(induction h0 hs : _) i.succ = hs i (induction h0 hs i.cast_succ) := by cases i; refl
/--
Define `C i` by induction on `i : fin (n + 1)` via induction on the underlying `nat` value.
This function has two arguments: `h0` handles the base case on `C 0`,
and `hs` defines the inductive step using `C i.cast_succ`.
A version of `fin.induction` taking `i : fin (n + 1)` as the first argument.
-/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def induction_on (i : fin (n + 1))
{C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*}
(h0 : C 0)
(hs : ∀ i : fin n, C i.cast_succ → C i.succ) : C i :=
induction h0 hs i
/-- Define `f : Π i : fin n.succ, C i` by separately handling the cases `i = 0` and
`i = j.succ`, `j : fin n`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def cases
{C : fin (succ n) → Sort*} (H0 : C 0) (Hs : Π i : fin n, C (i.succ)) :
Π (i : fin (succ n)), C i :=
induction H0 (λ i _, Hs i)
@[simp] theorem cases_zero {n} {C : fin (succ n) → Sort*} {H0 Hs} : @fin.cases n C H0 Hs 0 = H0 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem cases_succ {n} {C : fin (succ n) → Sort*} {H0 Hs} (i : fin n) :
@fin.cases n C H0 Hs i.succ = Hs i :=
by cases i; refl
@[simp] theorem cases_succ' {n} {C : fin (succ n) → Sort*} {H0 Hs} {i : ℕ} (h : i + 1 < n + 1) :
@fin.cases n C H0 Hs ⟨i.succ, h⟩ = Hs ⟨i, lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩ :=
by cases i; refl
lemma forall_fin_succ {P : fin (n+1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ P 0 ∧ (∀ i:fin n, P i.succ) :=
⟨λ H, ⟨H 0, λ i, H _⟩, λ ⟨H0, H1⟩ i, fin.cases H0 H1 i⟩
lemma exists_fin_succ {P : fin (n+1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ P 0 ∨ (∃i:fin n, P i.succ) :=
⟨λ ⟨i, h⟩, fin.cases or.inl (λ i hi, or.inr ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
λ h, h.elim (λ h, ⟨0, h⟩) $ λ⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨i.succ, hi⟩⟩
lemma forall_fin_one {p : fin 1 → Prop} : (∀ i, p i) ↔ p 0 := @unique.forall_iff (fin 1) _ p
lemma exists_fin_one {p : fin 1 → Prop} : (∃ i, p i) ↔ p 0 := @unique.exists_iff (fin 1) _ p
lemma forall_fin_two {p : fin 2 → Prop} : (∀ i, p i) ↔ p 0 ∧ p 1 :=
forall_fin_succ.trans $ and_congr_right $ λ _, forall_fin_one
lemma exists_fin_two {p : fin 2 → Prop} : (∃ i, p i) ↔ p 0 ∨ p 1 :=
exists_fin_succ.trans $ or_congr_right' exists_fin_one
lemma fin_two_eq_of_eq_zero_iff {a b : fin 2} (h : a = 0 ↔ b = 0) : a = b :=
by { revert a b, simp [forall_fin_two] }
/--
Define `C i` by reverse induction on `i : fin (n + 1)` via induction on the underlying `nat` value.
This function has two arguments: `hlast` handles the base case on `C (fin.last n)`,
and `hs` defines the inductive step using `C i.succ`, inducting downwards.
-/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def reverse_induction {n : ℕ}
{C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*}
(hlast : C (fin.last n))
(hs : ∀ i : fin n, C i.succ → C i.cast_succ) :
Π (i : fin (n + 1)), C i
| i :=
if hi : i = fin.last n
then _root_.cast (by rw hi) hlast
else
let j : fin n := ⟨i, lt_of_le_of_ne (nat.le_of_lt_succ i.2) (λ h, hi (fin.ext h))⟩ in
have wf : n + 1 - j.succ < n + 1 - i, begin
cases i,
rw [tsub_lt_tsub_iff_left_of_le];
simp [*, nat.succ_le_iff],
end,
have hi : i = fin.cast_succ j, from fin.ext rfl,
_root_.cast (by rw hi) (hs _ (reverse_induction j.succ))
using_well_founded { rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf (λ i : fin (n+1), n + 1 - i)⟩],
dec_tac := `[assumption] }
@[simp] lemma reverse_induction_last {n : ℕ}
{C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*}
(h0 : C (fin.last n))
(hs : ∀ i : fin n, C i.succ → C i.cast_succ) :
(reverse_induction h0 hs (fin.last n) : C (fin.last n)) = h0 :=
by rw [reverse_induction]; simp
@[simp] lemma reverse_induction_cast_succ {n : ℕ}
{C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*}
(h0 : C (fin.last n))
(hs : ∀ i : fin n, C i.succ → C i.cast_succ) (i : fin n):
(reverse_induction h0 hs i.cast_succ : C i.cast_succ) =
hs i (reverse_induction h0 hs i.succ) :=
begin
rw [reverse_induction, dif_neg (ne_of_lt (fin.cast_succ_lt_last i))],
cases i,
refl
end
/-- Define `f : Π i : fin n.succ, C i` by separately handling the cases `i = fin.last n` and
`i = j.cast_succ`, `j : fin n`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def last_cases {n : ℕ} {C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*}
(hlast : C (fin.last n)) (hcast : (Π (i : fin n), C i.cast_succ)) (i : fin (n + 1)) : C i :=
reverse_induction hlast (λ i _, hcast i) i
@[simp] lemma last_cases_last {n : ℕ} {C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*}
(hlast : C (fin.last n)) (hcast : (Π (i : fin n), C i.cast_succ)) :
(fin.last_cases hlast hcast (fin.last n): C (fin.last n)) = hlast :=
reverse_induction_last _ _
@[simp] lemma last_cases_cast_succ {n : ℕ} {C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*}
(hlast : C (fin.last n)) (hcast : (Π (i : fin n), C i.cast_succ)) (i : fin n) :
(fin.last_cases hlast hcast (fin.cast_succ i): C (fin.cast_succ i)) = hcast i :=
reverse_induction_cast_succ _ _ _
/-- Define `f : Π i : fin (m + n), C i` by separately handling the cases `i = cast_add n i`,
`j : fin m` and `i = nat_add m j`, `j : fin n`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def add_cases {m n : ℕ} {C : fin (m + n) → Sort u}
(hleft : Π i, C (cast_add n i))
(hright : Π i, C (nat_add m i)) (i : fin (m + n)) : C i :=
if hi : (i : ℕ) < m then eq.rec_on (cast_add_cast_lt n i hi) (hleft (cast_lt i hi))
else eq.rec_on (nat_add_sub_nat_cast (le_of_not_lt hi)) (hright _)
@[simp] lemma add_cases_left {m n : ℕ} {C : fin (m + n) → Sort*}
(hleft : Π i, C (cast_add n i)) (hright : Π i, C (nat_add m i)) (i : fin m) :
@add_cases _ _ C hleft hright (fin.cast_add n i) = hleft i :=
begin
cases i with i hi,
rw [add_cases, dif_pos (cast_add_lt _ _)],
refl
end
@[simp] lemma add_cases_right {m n : ℕ} {C : fin (m + n) → Sort*}
(hleft : Π i, C (cast_add n i)) (hright : Π i, C (nat_add m i)) (i : fin n) :
@add_cases _ _ C hleft hright (nat_add m i) = hright i :=
begin
have : ¬ (nat_add m i : ℕ) < m, from (le_coe_nat_add _ _).not_lt,
rw [add_cases, dif_neg this],
refine eq_of_heq ((eq_rec_heq _ _).trans _), congr' 1,
simp
end
end rec
lemma lift_fun_iff_succ {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trans α r] {f : fin (n + 1) → α} :
((<) ⇒ r) f f ↔ ∀ i : fin n, r (f i.cast_succ) (f i.succ) :=
begin
split,
{ intros H i,
exact H i.cast_succ_lt_succ },
{ refine λ H i, fin.induction _ _,
{ exact λ h, (h.not_le (zero_le i)).elim },
{ intros j ihj hij,
rw [← le_cast_succ_iff] at hij,
rcases hij.eq_or_lt with rfl|hlt,
exacts [H j, trans (ihj hlt) (H j)] } }
end
/-- A function `f` on `fin (n + 1)` is strictly monotone if and only if `f i < f (i + 1)`
for all `i`. -/
lemma strict_mono_iff_lt_succ {α : Type*} [preorder α] {f : fin (n + 1) → α} :
strict_mono f ↔ ∀ i : fin n, f i.cast_succ < f i.succ :=
lift_fun_iff_succ (<)
/-- A function `f` on `fin (n + 1)` is monotone if and only if `f i ≤ f (i + 1)` for all `i`. -/
lemma monotone_iff_le_succ {α : Type*} [preorder α] {f : fin (n + 1) → α} :
monotone f ↔ ∀ i : fin n, f i.cast_succ ≤ f i.succ :=
monotone_iff_forall_lt.trans $ lift_fun_iff_succ (≤)
/-- A function `f` on `fin (n + 1)` is strictly antitone if and only if `f (i + 1) < f i`
for all `i`. -/
lemma strict_anti_iff_succ_lt {α : Type*} [preorder α] {f : fin (n + 1) → α} :
strict_anti f ↔ ∀ i : fin n, f i.succ < f i.cast_succ :=
lift_fun_iff_succ (>)
/-- A function `f` on `fin (n + 1)` is antitone if and only if `f (i + 1) ≤ f i` for all `i`. -/
lemma antitone_iff_succ_le {α : Type*} [preorder α] {f : fin (n + 1) → α} :
antitone f ↔ ∀ i : fin n, f i.succ ≤ f i.cast_succ :=
antitone_iff_forall_lt.trans $ lift_fun_iff_succ (≥)
section add_group
open nat int
/-- Negation on `fin n` -/
instance (n : ℕ) : has_neg (fin n) := ⟨λ a, ⟨(n - a) % n, nat.mod_lt _ a.pos⟩⟩
/-- Abelian group structure on `fin n`. -/
instance (n : ℕ) [ne_zero n] : add_comm_group (fin n) :=
{ add_left_neg := λ ⟨a, ha⟩, fin.ext $ trans (nat.mod_add_mod _ _ _) $
by { rw [fin.coe_mk, fin.coe_zero, tsub_add_cancel_of_le, nat.mod_self], exact le_of_lt ha },
sub_eq_add_neg := λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩, fin.ext $
show (a + (n - b)) % n = (a + (n - b) % n) % n, by simp,
sub := fin.sub,
..fin.add_comm_monoid n,
..fin.has_neg n }
protected lemma coe_neg (a : fin n) : ((-a : fin n) : ℕ) = (n - a) % n := rfl
protected lemma coe_sub (a b : fin n) : ((a - b : fin n) : ℕ) = (a + (n - b)) % n :=
by cases a; cases b; refl
@[simp] lemma coe_fin_one (a : fin 1) : ↑a = 0 :=
by rw [subsingleton.elim a 0, fin.coe_zero]
@[simp] lemma coe_neg_one : ↑(-1 : fin (n + 1)) = n :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp },
rw [fin.coe_neg, fin.coe_one, nat.succ_sub_one, nat.mod_eq_of_lt],
constructor
end
lemma coe_sub_one {n} (a : fin (n + 1)) : ↑(a - 1) = if a = 0 then n else a - 1 :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp },
split_ifs,
{ simp [h] },
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, coe_add_eq_ite, coe_neg_one, if_pos, add_comm, add_tsub_add_eq_tsub_left],
rw [add_comm ↑a, add_le_add_iff_left, nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero],
rwa fin.ext_iff at h
end
lemma coe_sub_iff_le {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n} :
(↑(a - b) : ℕ) = a - b ↔ b ≤ a :=
begin
cases n, {exact fin_zero_elim a},
rw [le_iff_coe_le_coe, fin.coe_sub, ←add_tsub_assoc_of_le b.is_lt.le a],
cases le_or_lt (b : ℕ) a with h h,
{ simp [←tsub_add_eq_add_tsub h, h, nat.mod_eq_of_lt ((nat.sub_le _ _).trans_lt a.is_lt)] },
{ rw [nat.mod_eq_of_lt, tsub_eq_zero_of_le h.le, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, ←not_iff_not],
{ simpa [b.is_lt.trans_le (le_add_self)] using h },
{ rwa [tsub_lt_iff_left (b.is_lt.le.trans (le_add_self)), add_lt_add_iff_right] } }
end
lemma coe_sub_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n} :
(↑(a - b) : ℕ) = n + a - b ↔ a < b :=
begin
cases n, {exact fin_zero_elim a},
rw [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, fin.coe_sub, add_comm],
cases le_or_lt (b : ℕ) a with h h,
{ simpa [add_tsub_assoc_of_le h, ←not_le, h]
using ((nat.mod_lt _ (nat.succ_pos _)).trans_le le_self_add).ne },
{ simp [←tsub_tsub_assoc b.is_lt.le h.le, ←tsub_add_eq_add_tsub b.is_lt.le,
nat.mod_eq_of_lt (tsub_lt_self (nat.succ_pos _) (tsub_pos_of_lt h)), h] }
end
@[simp] lemma lt_sub_one_iff {n : ℕ} {k : fin (n + 2)} :
k < k - 1 ↔ k = 0 :=
begin
rcases k with ⟨(_|k), hk⟩,
simp [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe],
have : (k + 1 + (n + 1)) % (n + 2) = k % (n + 2),
{ rw [add_right_comm, add_assoc, add_mod_right] },
simp [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, ext_iff, fin.coe_sub, succ_eq_add_one, this,
mod_eq_of_lt ((lt_succ_self _).trans hk)]
end
@[simp] lemma le_sub_one_iff {n : ℕ} {k : fin (n + 1)} :
k ≤ k - 1 ↔ k = 0 :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp [subsingleton.elim (k - 1) k, subsingleton.elim 0 k] },
rw [←lt_sub_one_iff, le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_sub_one_iff, or_iff_left_iff_imp, eq_comm,
sub_eq_iff_eq_add],
simp
end
@[simp] lemma sub_one_lt_iff {n : ℕ} {k : fin (n + 1)} :
k - 1 < k ↔ 0 < k :=
not_iff_not.1 $ by simp only [not_lt, le_sub_one_iff, le_zero_iff]
lemma last_sub (i : fin (n + 1)) : last n - i = i.rev :=
ext $ by rw [coe_sub_iff_le.2 i.le_last, coe_last, coe_rev, nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
end add_group
section succ_above
lemma succ_above_aux (p : fin (n + 1)) :
strict_mono (λ i : fin n, if i.cast_succ < p then i.cast_succ else i.succ) :=
(cast_succ : fin n ↪o _).strict_mono.ite (succ_embedding n).strict_mono
(λ i j hij hj, lt_trans ((cast_succ : fin n ↪o _).lt_iff_lt.2 hij) hj)
(λ i, (cast_succ_lt_succ i).le)
/-- `succ_above p i` embeds `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succ_above (p : fin (n + 1)) : fin n ↪o fin (n + 1) :=
order_embedding.of_strict_mono _ p.succ_above_aux
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `cast_succ` when the resulting `i.cast_succ < p`. -/
lemma succ_above_below (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) (h : i.cast_succ < p) :
p.succ_above i = i.cast_succ :=
by { rw [succ_above], exact if_pos h }
@[simp] lemma succ_above_ne_zero_zero [ne_zero n] {a : fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succ_above 0 = 0 :=
begin
rw fin.succ_above_below,
{ refl },
{ exact bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha }
end
lemma succ_above_eq_zero_iff [ne_zero n] {a : fin (n + 1)} {b : fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succ_above b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
by simp only [←succ_above_ne_zero_zero ha, order_embedding.eq_iff_eq]
lemma succ_above_ne_zero [ne_zero n] {a : fin (n + 1)} {b : fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.succ_above b ≠ 0 :=
mt (succ_above_eq_zero_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_above_zero : ⇑(succ_above (0 : fin (n + 1))) = fin.succ := rfl
/-- Embedding `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `cast_succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_above_last : succ_above (fin.last n) = cast_succ :=
by { ext, simp only [succ_above_below, cast_succ_lt_last] }
lemma succ_above_last_apply (i : fin n) : succ_above (fin.last n) i = i.cast_succ :=
by rw succ_above_last
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succ_above_above (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) (h : p ≤ i.cast_succ) :
p.succ_above i = i.succ :=
by simp [succ_above, h.not_lt]
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` is always about some hole `p`. -/
lemma succ_above_lt_ge (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) : i.cast_succ < p ∨ p ≤ i.cast_succ :=
lt_or_ge (cast_succ i) p
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` is always about some hole `p`. -/
lemma succ_above_lt_gt (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) : i.cast_succ < p ∨ p < i.succ :=
or.cases_on (succ_above_lt_ge p i)
(λ h, or.inl h) (λ h, or.inr (lt_of_le_of_lt h (cast_succ_lt_succ i)))
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_above_lt_iff (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) :
p.succ_above i < p ↔ i.cast_succ < p :=
begin
refine iff.intro _ _,
{ intro h,
cases succ_above_lt_ge p i with H H,
{ exact H },
{ rw succ_above_above _ _ H at h,
exact lt_trans (cast_succ_lt_succ i) h } },
{ intro h,
rw succ_above_below _ _ h,
exact h }
end
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succ_above_iff (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) : p < p.succ_above i ↔ p ≤ i.cast_succ :=
begin
refine iff.intro _ _,
{ intro h,
cases succ_above_lt_ge p i with H H,
{ rw succ_above_below _ _ H at h,
exact le_of_lt h },
{ exact H } },
{ intro h,
rw succ_above_above _ _ h,
exact lt_of_le_of_lt h (cast_succ_lt_succ i) },
end
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
theorem succ_above_ne (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) : p.succ_above i ≠ p :=
begin
intro eq,
by_cases H : i.cast_succ < p,
{ simpa [lt_irrefl, ←succ_above_below _ _ H, eq] using H },
{ simpa [←succ_above_above _ _ (le_of_not_lt H), eq] using cast_succ_lt_succ i }
end
/-- Embedding a positive `fin n` results in a positive fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succ_above_pos [ne_zero n] (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) (h : 0 < i) :
0 < p.succ_above i :=
begin
by_cases H : i.cast_succ < p,
{ simpa [succ_above_below _ _ H] using cast_succ_pos h },
{ simp [succ_above_above _ _ (le_of_not_lt H)] },
end
@[simp] lemma succ_above_cast_lt {x y : fin (n + 1)} (h : x < y)
(hx : x.1 < n := lt_of_lt_of_le h y.le_last) :
y.succ_above (x.cast_lt hx) = x :=
by { rw [succ_above_below, cast_succ_cast_lt], exact h }
@[simp] lemma succ_above_pred {x y : fin (n + 1)} (h : x < y)
(hy : y ≠ 0 := (x.zero_le.trans_lt h).ne') :
x.succ_above (y.pred hy) = y :=
by { rw [succ_above_above, succ_pred], simpa [le_iff_coe_le_coe] using nat.le_pred_of_lt h }
lemma cast_lt_succ_above {x : fin n} {y : fin (n + 1)} (h : cast_succ x < y)
(h' : (y.succ_above x).1 < n := lt_of_lt_of_le ((succ_above_lt_iff _ _).2 h) (le_last y)) :
(y.succ_above x).cast_lt h' = x :=
by simp only [succ_above_below _ _ h, cast_lt_cast_succ]
lemma pred_succ_above {x : fin n} {y : fin (n + 1)} (h : y ≤ cast_succ x)
(h' : y.succ_above x ≠ 0 := (y.zero_le.trans_lt $ (lt_succ_above_iff _ _).2 h).ne') :
(y.succ_above x).pred h' = x :=
by simp only [succ_above_above _ _ h, pred_succ]
lemma exists_succ_above_eq {x y : fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ z, y.succ_above z = x :=
begin
cases h.lt_or_lt with hlt hlt,
exacts [⟨_, succ_above_cast_lt hlt⟩, ⟨_, succ_above_pred hlt⟩],
end
@[simp] lemma exists_succ_above_eq_iff {x y : fin (n + 1)} : (∃ z, x.succ_above z = y) ↔ y ≠ x :=
begin
refine ⟨_, exists_succ_above_eq⟩,
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩,
exact succ_above_ne _ _
end
/-- The range of `p.succ_above` is everything except `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_succ_above (p : fin (n + 1)) : set.range (p.succ_above) = {p}ᶜ :=
set.ext $ λ _, exists_succ_above_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma range_succ (n : ℕ) : set.range (fin.succ : fin n → fin (n + 1)) = {0}ᶜ :=
range_succ_above 0
@[simp] lemma exists_succ_eq_iff {x : fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
@exists_succ_above_eq_iff n 0 x
/-- Given a fixed pivot `x : fin (n + 1)`, `x.succ_above` is injective -/
lemma succ_above_right_injective {x : fin (n + 1)} : injective (succ_above x) :=
(succ_above x).injective
/-- Given a fixed pivot `x : fin (n + 1)`, `x.succ_above` is injective -/
lemma succ_above_right_inj {x : fin (n + 1)} :
x.succ_above a = x.succ_above b ↔ a = b :=
succ_above_right_injective.eq_iff
/-- `succ_above` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succ_above_left_injective : injective (@succ_above n) :=
λ _ _ h, by simpa [range_succ_above] using congr_arg (λ f : fin n ↪o fin (n + 1), (set.range f)ᶜ) h
/-- `succ_above` is injective at the pivot -/
@[simp] lemma succ_above_left_inj {x y : fin (n + 1)} :
x.succ_above = y.succ_above ↔ x = y :=
succ_above_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma zero_succ_above {n : ℕ} (i : fin n) :
(0 : fin (n + 1)).succ_above i = i.succ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma succ_succ_above_zero {n : ℕ} [ne_zero n] (i : fin n) :
(i.succ).succ_above 0 = 0 :=
succ_above_below _ _ (succ_pos _)
@[simp] lemma succ_succ_above_succ {n : ℕ} (i : fin (n + 1)) (j : fin n) :
(i.succ).succ_above j.succ = (i.succ_above j).succ :=
(lt_or_ge j.cast_succ i).elim
(λ h, have h' : j.succ.cast_succ < i.succ, by simpa [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe] using h,
by { ext, simp [succ_above_below _ _ h, succ_above_below _ _ h'] })
(λ h, have h' : i.succ ≤ j.succ.cast_succ, by simpa [le_iff_coe_le_coe] using h,
by { ext, simp [succ_above_above _ _ h, succ_above_above _ _ h'] })
@[simp] lemma one_succ_above_zero {n : ℕ} :
(1 : fin (n + 2)).succ_above 0 = 0 :=
succ_succ_above_zero 0
/-- By moving `succ` to the outside of this expression, we create opportunities for further
simplification using `succ_above_zero` or `succ_succ_above_zero`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succ_above_one {n : ℕ} [ne_zero n] (i : fin (n + 1)) :
(i.succ).succ_above 1 = (i.succ_above 0).succ :=
by rw [← succ_succ_above_succ i 0, succ_zero_eq_one]
@[simp] lemma one_succ_above_succ {n : ℕ} (j : fin n) :
(1 : fin (n + 2)).succ_above j.succ = j.succ.succ :=
succ_succ_above_succ 0 j
@[simp] lemma one_succ_above_one {n : ℕ} :
(1 : fin (n + 3)).succ_above 1 = 2 :=
succ_succ_above_succ 0 0
end succ_above
section pred_above
/-- `pred_above p i` embeds `i : fin (n+1)` into `fin n` by subtracting one if `p < i`. -/
def pred_above (p : fin n) (i : fin (n+1)) : fin n :=
if h : p.cast_succ < i then
i.pred (ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le p.cast_succ) h)).symm
else
i.cast_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_not_lt h) p.2)
lemma pred_above_right_monotone (p : fin n) : monotone p.pred_above :=
λ a b H,
begin
dsimp [pred_above],
split_ifs with ha hb hb,
all_goals { simp only [le_iff_coe_le_coe, coe_pred], },
{ exact pred_le_pred H, },
{ calc _ ≤ _ : nat.pred_le _
... ≤ _ : H, },
{ simp at ha, exact le_pred_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt ha hb), },
{ exact H, },
end
lemma pred_above_left_monotone (i : fin (n + 1)) : monotone (λ p, pred_above p i) :=
λ a b H,
begin
dsimp [pred_above],
split_ifs with ha hb hb,
all_goals { simp only [le_iff_coe_le_coe, coe_pred] },
{ exact pred_le _, },
{ have : b < a := cast_succ_lt_cast_succ_iff.mpr (hb.trans_le (le_of_not_gt ha)),
exact absurd H this.not_le }
end
/-- `cast_pred` embeds `i : fin (n + 2)` into `fin (n + 1)`
by lowering just `last (n + 1)` to `last n`. -/
def cast_pred (i : fin (n + 2)) : fin (n + 1) :=
pred_above (last n) i
@[simp] lemma cast_pred_zero : cast_pred (0 : fin (n + 2)) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_pred_one : cast_pred (1 : fin (n + 2)) = 1 :=
by { cases n, apply subsingleton.elim, refl }
@[simp] theorem pred_above_zero {i : fin (n + 2)} (hi : i ≠ 0) :
pred_above 0 i = i.pred hi :=
begin
dsimp [pred_above],
rw dif_pos,
exact (pos_iff_ne_zero _).mpr hi,
end
@[simp] lemma cast_pred_last : cast_pred (last (n + 1)) = last n :=
eq_of_veq (by simp [cast_pred, pred_above, cast_succ_lt_last])
@[simp] lemma cast_pred_mk (n i : ℕ) (h : i < n + 1) :
cast_pred ⟨i, lt_succ_of_lt h⟩ = ⟨i, h⟩ :=
begin
have : ¬cast_succ (last n) < ⟨i, lt_succ_of_lt h⟩,
{ simpa [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe] using le_of_lt_succ h },
simp [cast_pred, pred_above, this]
end
lemma coe_cast_pred {n : ℕ} (a : fin (n + 2)) (hx : a < fin.last _) :
(a.cast_pred : ℕ) = a :=
begin
rcases a with ⟨a, ha⟩,
rw cast_pred_mk,
exacts [rfl, hx],
end
lemma pred_above_below (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin (n + 2)) (h : i ≤ p.cast_succ) :
p.pred_above i = i.cast_pred :=
begin
have : i ≤ (last n).cast_succ := h.trans p.le_last,
simp [pred_above, cast_pred, h.not_lt, this.not_lt]
end
@[simp] lemma pred_above_last : pred_above (fin.last n) = cast_pred := rfl
lemma pred_above_last_apply (i : fin n) : pred_above (fin.last n) i = i.cast_pred :=
by rw pred_above_last
lemma pred_above_above (p : fin n) (i : fin (n + 1)) (h : p.cast_succ < i) :
p.pred_above i = i.pred (p.cast_succ.zero_le.trans_lt h).ne.symm :=
by simp [pred_above, h]
lemma cast_pred_monotone : monotone (@cast_pred n) :=
pred_above_right_monotone (last _)
/-- Sending `fin (n+1)` to `fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p` is the identity away from `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_above_pred_above {p : fin n} {i : fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ p.cast_succ) :
p.cast_succ.succ_above (p.pred_above i) = i :=
begin
dsimp [pred_above, succ_above],
rcases p with ⟨p, _⟩,
rcases i with ⟨i, _⟩,
cases lt_or_le i p with H H,
{ rw dif_neg, rw if_pos, refl, exact H, simp, apply le_of_lt H, },
{ rw dif_pos, rw if_neg,
swap 3, -- For some reason `simp` doesn't fire fully unless we discharge the third goal.
{ exact lt_of_le_of_ne H (ne.symm h), },
{ simp, },
{ simp only [fin.mk_eq_mk, ne.def, fin.cast_succ_mk] at h,
simp only [pred, fin.mk_lt_mk, not_lt],
exact nat.le_pred_of_lt (nat.lt_of_le_and_ne H (ne.symm h)), }, },
end
/-- Sending `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a gap at `p`
then back to `fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p` is the identity. -/
@[simp] lemma pred_above_succ_above (p : fin n) (i : fin n) :
p.pred_above (p.cast_succ.succ_above i) = i :=
begin
dsimp [pred_above, succ_above],
rcases p with ⟨p, _⟩,
rcases i with ⟨i, _⟩,
split_ifs,
{ rw dif_neg,
{ refl },
{ simp_rw [if_pos h],
simp only [subtype.mk_lt_mk, not_lt],
exact le_of_lt h, }, },
{ rw dif_pos,
{ refl, },
{ simp_rw [if_neg h],
exact lt_succ_iff.mpr (not_lt.mp h), }, },
end
lemma cast_succ_pred_eq_pred_cast_succ {a : fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := a.cast_succ_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) : (a.pred ha).cast_succ = a.cast_succ.pred ha' :=
by { cases a, refl }
/-- `pred` commutes with `succ_above`. -/
lemma pred_succ_above_pred {a : fin (n + 2)} {b : fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hk := succ_above_ne_zero ha hb) :
(a.pred ha).succ_above (b.pred hb) = (a.succ_above b).pred hk :=
begin
obtain hbelow | habove := lt_or_le b.cast_succ a, -- `rwa` uses them
{ rw fin.succ_above_below,
{ rwa [cast_succ_pred_eq_pred_cast_succ , fin.pred_inj, fin.succ_above_below] },
{ rwa [cast_succ_pred_eq_pred_cast_succ , pred_lt_pred_iff] } },
{ rw fin.succ_above_above,
have : (b.pred hb).succ = b.succ.pred (fin.succ_ne_zero _), by rw [succ_pred, pred_succ],
{ rwa [this, fin.pred_inj, fin.succ_above_above] },
{ rwa [cast_succ_pred_eq_pred_cast_succ , fin.pred_le_pred_iff] } }
end
/-- `succ` commutes with `pred_above`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succ_pred_above_succ (a : fin n) (b : fin (n+1)) :
a.succ.pred_above b.succ = (a.pred_above b).succ :=
begin
obtain h₁ | h₂ := lt_or_le a.cast_succ b,
{ rw [fin.pred_above_above _ _ h₁, fin.succ_pred,
fin.pred_above_above, fin.pred_succ],
simpa only [fin.lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, fin.coe_cast_succ,
fin.coe_succ, add_lt_add_iff_right] using h₁, },
{ cases n,
{ exfalso,
exact not_lt_zero' a.is_lt, },
{ rw [fin.pred_above_below a b h₂, fin.pred_above_below a.succ b.succ
(by simpa only [le_iff_coe_le_coe, coe_succ, coe_cast_succ,
add_le_add_iff_right] using h₂)],
ext,
have h₀ : (b : ℕ) < n+1,
{ simp only [le_iff_coe_le_coe, coe_cast_succ] at h₂,
simpa only [lt_succ_iff] using h₂.trans a.is_le, },
have h₁ : (b.succ : ℕ) < n+2,
{ rw ← nat.succ_lt_succ_iff at h₀,
simpa only [coe_succ] using h₀, },
simp only [coe_cast_pred b h₀, coe_cast_pred b.succ h₁, coe_succ], }, },
end
@[simp] theorem cast_pred_cast_succ (i : fin (n + 1)) :
cast_pred i.cast_succ = i :=
by simp [cast_pred, pred_above, le_last]
lemma cast_succ_cast_pred {i : fin (n + 2)} (h : i < last _) : cast_succ i.cast_pred = i :=
begin
rw [cast_pred, pred_above, dif_neg],
{ simp [fin.eq_iff_veq] },
{ exact h.not_le }
end
lemma coe_cast_pred_le_self (i : fin (n + 2)) : (i.cast_pred : ℕ) ≤ i :=
begin
rcases i.le_last.eq_or_lt with rfl|h,
{ simp },
{ rw [cast_pred, pred_above, dif_neg],
{ simp },
{ simpa [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, le_iff_coe_le_coe, lt_succ_iff] using h } }
end
lemma coe_cast_pred_lt_iff {i : fin (n + 2)} : (i.cast_pred : ℕ) < i ↔ i = fin.last _ :=
begin
rcases i.le_last.eq_or_lt with rfl|H,
{ simp },
{ simp only [ne_of_lt H],
rw ←cast_succ_cast_pred H,
simp }
end
lemma lt_last_iff_coe_cast_pred {i : fin (n + 2)} : i < fin.last _ ↔ (i.cast_pred : ℕ) = i :=
begin
rcases i.le_last.eq_or_lt with rfl|H,
{ simp },
{ simp only [H],
rw ←cast_succ_cast_pred H,
simp }
end
end pred_above
/-- `min n m` as an element of `fin (m + 1)` -/
def clamp (n m : ℕ) : fin (m + 1) := of_nat $ min n m
@[simp] lemma coe_clamp (n m : ℕ) : (clamp n m : ℕ) = min n m :=
nat.mod_eq_of_lt $ nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr $ min_le_right _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_of_nat_eq_mod (m n : ℕ) [ne_zero m] :
((n : fin m) : ℕ) = n % m :=
rfl
section mul
/-!
### mul
-/
lemma val_mul {n : ℕ} : ∀ a b : fin n, (a * b).val = (a.val * b.val) % n
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
lemma coe_mul {n : ℕ} : ∀ a b : fin n, ((a * b : fin n) : ℕ) = (a * b) % n
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
@[simp] protected lemma mul_one [ne_zero n] (k : fin n) : k * 1 = k :=
begin
unfreezingI { cases n },
{ simp },
unfreezingI { cases n },
{ simp },
simp [eq_iff_veq, mul_def, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt k)]
end
protected lemma mul_comm (a b : fin n) : a * b = b * a :=
fin.eq_of_veq $ by rw [mul_def, mul_def, mul_comm]
@[simp] protected lemma one_mul [ne_zero n] (k : fin n) : (1 : fin n) * k = k :=
by rw [fin.mul_comm, fin.mul_one]
@[simp] protected lemma mul_zero [ne_zero n] (k : fin n) : k * 0 = 0 :=
by simp [eq_iff_veq, mul_def]
@[simp] protected lemma zero_mul [ne_zero n] (k : fin n) : (0 : fin n) * k = 0 :=
by simp [eq_iff_veq, mul_def]
end mul
section
-- Note that here we are disabling the "safety" of reflected, to allow us to reuse `nat.mk_numeral`.
-- The usual way to provide the required `reflected` instance would be via rewriting to prove that
-- the expression we use here is equivalent.
local attribute [semireducible] reflected
meta instance reflect : Π n, has_reflect (fin n)
| 0 := fin_zero_elim
| (n + 1) := nat.mk_numeral `(fin n.succ)
`(by apply_instance : has_zero (fin n.succ))
`(by apply_instance : has_one (fin n.succ))
`(by apply_instance : has_add (fin n.succ)) ∘ fin.val
end
end fin
|
686d28234e9c641e9bb24abe5dea2e0b49f9dfba | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/algebra/smul_with_zero.lean | da48c793260348e8105478437913becce761c651 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,032 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import algebra.group_power.basic
import algebra.opposites
/-!
# Introduce `smul_with_zero`
In analogy with the usual monoid action on a Type `M`, we introduce an action of a
`monoid_with_zero` on a Type with `0`.
In particular, for Types `R` and `M`, both containing `0`, we define `smul_with_zero R M` to
be the typeclass where the products `r • 0` and `0 • m` vanish for all `r : R` and all `m : M`.
Moreover, in the case in which `R` is a `monoid_with_zero`, we introduce the typeclass
`mul_action_with_zero R M`, mimicking group actions and having an absorbing `0` in `R`.
Thus, the action is required to be compatible with
* the unit of the monoid, acting as the identity;
* the zero of the monoid_with_zero, acting as zero;
* associativity of the monoid.
We also add an `instance`:
* any `monoid_with_zero` has a `mul_action_with_zero R R` acting on itself.
-/
variables {R R' M M' : Type*}
section has_zero
variables (R M)
/-- `smul_with_zero` is a class consisting of a Type `R` with `0 ∈ R` and a scalar multiplication
of `R` on a Type `M` with `0`, such that the equality `r • m = 0` holds if at least one among `r`
or `m` equals `0`. -/
class smul_with_zero [has_zero R] [has_zero M] extends has_scalar R M :=
(smul_zero : ∀ r : R, r • (0 : M) = 0)
(zero_smul : ∀ m : M, (0 : R) • m = 0)
instance mul_zero_class.to_smul_with_zero [mul_zero_class R] : smul_with_zero R R :=
{ smul := (*),
smul_zero := mul_zero,
zero_smul := zero_mul }
/-- Like `mul_zero_class.to_smul_with_zero`, but multiplies on the right. -/
instance mul_zero_class.to_opposite_smul_with_zero [mul_zero_class R] : smul_with_zero Rᵒᵖ R :=
{ smul := (•),
smul_zero := λ r, zero_mul _,
zero_smul := mul_zero }
instance add_monoid.to_smul_with_zero [add_monoid M] : smul_with_zero ℕ M :=
{ smul_zero := nsmul_zero,
zero_smul := zero_nsmul }
variables (R) {M} [has_zero R] [has_zero M] [smul_with_zero R M]
@[simp] lemma zero_smul (m : M) : (0 : R) • m = 0 := smul_with_zero.zero_smul m
variables {R} (M)
/-- Note that this lemma has different typeclass assumptions to `smul_zero`. -/
@[simp] lemma smul_zero' (r : R) : r • (0 : M) = 0 := smul_with_zero.smul_zero r
variables {R M} [has_zero R'] [has_zero M'] [has_scalar R M']
/-- Pullback a `smul_with_zero` structure along an injective zero-preserving homomorphism.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def function.injective.smul_with_zero
(f : zero_hom M' M) (hf : function.injective f) (smul : ∀ (a : R) b, f (a • b) = a • f b) :
smul_with_zero R M' :=
{ smul := (•),
zero_smul := λ a, hf $ by simp [smul],
smul_zero := λ a, hf $ by simp [smul]}
/-- Pushforward a `smul_with_zero` structure along a surjective zero-preserving homomorphism.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def function.surjective.smul_with_zero
(f : zero_hom M M') (hf : function.surjective f) (smul : ∀ (a : R) b, f (a • b) = a • f b) :
smul_with_zero R M' :=
{ smul := (•),
zero_smul := λ m, by { rcases hf m with ⟨x, rfl⟩, simp [←smul] },
smul_zero := λ c, by simp only [← f.map_zero, ← smul, smul_zero'] }
variables (M)
/-- Compose a `smul_with_zero` with a `zero_hom`, with action `f r' • m` -/
def smul_with_zero.comp_hom (f : zero_hom R' R) : smul_with_zero R' M :=
{ smul := (•) ∘ f,
smul_zero := λ m, by simp,
zero_smul := λ m, by simp }
end has_zero
section monoid_with_zero
variables [monoid_with_zero R] [monoid_with_zero R'] [has_zero M]
variables (R M)
/-- An action of a monoid with zero `R` on a Type `M`, also with `0`, extends `mul_action` and
is compatible with `0` (both in `R` and in `M`), with `1 ∈ R`, and with associativity of
multiplication on the monoid `M`. -/
class mul_action_with_zero extends mul_action R M :=
-- these fields are copied from `smul_with_zero`, as `extends` behaves poorly
(smul_zero : ∀ r : R, r • (0 : M) = 0)
(zero_smul : ∀ m : M, (0 : R) • m = 0)
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance mul_action_with_zero.to_smul_with_zero [m : mul_action_with_zero R M] :
smul_with_zero R M :=
{..m}
/-- See also `semiring.to_module` -/
instance monoid_with_zero.to_mul_action_with_zero : mul_action_with_zero R R :=
{ ..mul_zero_class.to_smul_with_zero R,
..monoid.to_mul_action R }
/-- Like `monoid_with_zero.to_mul_action_with_zero`, but multiplies on the right. See also
`semiring.to_opposite_module` -/
instance monoid_with_zero.to_opposite_mul_action_with_zero : mul_action_with_zero Rᵒᵖ R :=
{ ..mul_zero_class.to_opposite_smul_with_zero R,
..monoid.to_opposite_mul_action R }
variables {R M} [mul_action_with_zero R M] [has_zero M'] [has_scalar R M']
/-- Pullback a `mul_action_with_zero` structure along an injective zero-preserving homomorphism.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def function.injective.mul_action_with_zero
(f : zero_hom M' M) (hf : function.injective f) (smul : ∀ (a : R) b, f (a • b) = a • f b) :
mul_action_with_zero R M' :=
{ ..hf.mul_action f smul, ..hf.smul_with_zero f smul }
/-- Pushforward a `mul_action_with_zero` structure along a surjective zero-preserving homomorphism.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def function.surjective.mul_action_with_zero
(f : zero_hom M M') (hf : function.surjective f) (smul : ∀ (a : R) b, f (a • b) = a • f b) :
mul_action_with_zero R M' :=
{ ..hf.mul_action f smul, ..hf.smul_with_zero f smul }
variables (M)
/-- Compose a `mul_action_with_zero` with a `monoid_with_zero_hom`, with action `f r' • m` -/
def mul_action_with_zero.comp_hom (f : monoid_with_zero_hom R' R) :
mul_action_with_zero R' M :=
{ smul := (•) ∘ f,
mul_smul := λ r s m, by simp [mul_smul],
one_smul := λ m, by simp,
.. smul_with_zero.comp_hom M f.to_zero_hom}
end monoid_with_zero
|
3e15372e6214c7d375fefe72a0cc6c0750c43084 | 097294e9b80f0d9893ac160b9c7219aa135b51b9 | /instructor/higher_order_funcs/higher_order_funcs_exercises.lean | 3ddf3af9b508b4cfda7c9b85478a0e2956251859 | [] | no_license | AbigailCastro17/CS2102-Discrete-Math | cf296251be9418ce90206f5e66bde9163e21abf9 | d741e4d2d6a9b2e0c8380e51706218b8f608cee4 | refs/heads/main | 1,682,891,087,358 | 1,621,401,341,000 | 1,621,401,341,000 | 368,749,959 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,097 | lean | import .higher_order_2
/-
Exercise: Consider apply_n again. It takes a
function, f, and a natural number, n, and returns
a new function, let's call it f^n, that applies f
n times to its argument.
Note: f^n is simply the function f composed with
itself n times. Write a new version of apply_n,
with exactly the same type as apply_n, but now
using the ∘ notation for function composition and
Lean's polymorphic "id" (identity) function.
-/
-- Answer
def apply_n' {α : Type} : (α → α) → ℕ → (α → α)
| f 0 := id
| f (n' + 1) := f ∘ (apply_n' f n')
/-
Suppose we want to compute a Boolean value, with the
result, true (tt), if all of the strings in a list of
strings has even length, and false (ff) otherwise. To
build this function, it'd be nice to have three helper
functions: len : string → ℕ, that computes the length
of a given string; ev_nat, that determines whether a
given natural number is even (tt) or not. Third, we
can compose these functions to computer whether a
given string is of even length.
-/
def len := string.length
def ev : ℕ → bool
| 0:=tt
| 1:=ff
| (n'+2):=ev n'
def ev_string := compose len ev
/-
The composition, compose len ev, gives us a new
function that takes a string and return a boolean
that depends on whether its length is even or not.
-/
#eval ev_string "Hello!"
/-
We can easily confirm that ev_string : string → bool.
-/
#check ev_string
/-
Here's the key idea: we can reduce a list of strings to
a Boolean indicating whether the list has the all-even
property as the conjunction of two predicates: (1) h is
even, (2) the rest of the list has the all-even property.
The algorithm is thus, first reduce the rest of the list
to a boolean value, then compute whether the current head
has the property, then compute the conjunction (and) of
these two Boolean values.
In a sense we start at the right end of the list and
reduce it to an "accumulated" value, starting with an
"identity" value, then moving right to left, updating
the accumulated value with the value for the curent list
head.
Let's think, then, about a function that takes these two
values -- the current head, (h : string) and the result,
(acc : bool), of having already reduced the tail of the
list to a bool -- and that combines these two values, a
string and an accumulated bool into a bool result.
-/
def all_ev_op : string → bool → bool
| s b := band (ev_string s) b
#eval foldr nat.add 0 [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
#eval foldr nat.mul 1 [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
def add_all := foldr nat.add 0
def mul_all := foldr nat.mul 1
#eval mul_all [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
def sum_list := foldr nat.add 0
def prod_list := foldr nat.mul 1
def all_ev := foldr all_ev_op tt
def some_ev_op : string → bool → bool
| s b := bor (ev_string s) b
def some_ev := foldr some_ev_op ff
#eval some_ev []
#eval some_ev ["aa","f"]
def le : ℕ → ℕ → bool
| 0 _ := tt
| (n' +1) 0 := ff
| (n' + 1) (m' + 1) := le n' m'
#check @foldr
#eval all_ev ["eelfff","eeee","fffff"]
#eval filter ev_string ["","BVKI",""]
|
58fdd6c59d46764b2223cd30aa2aa81c3ddc8a4d | f20db13587f4dd28a4b1fbd31953afd491691fa0 | /leanpkg/leanpkg/main.lean | c6539ef2823871671add08a4c30e00f6e39cb1e0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AHartNtkn/lean | 9a971edfc6857c63edcbf96bea6841b9a84cf916 | 0d83a74b26541421fc1aa33044c35b03759710ed | refs/heads/master | 1,620,592,591,236 | 1,516,749,881,000 | 1,516,749,881,000 | 118,697,288 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,516,759,470,000 | 1,516,759,470,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,760 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Gabriel Ebner
-/
import leanpkg.resolve leanpkg.git
namespace leanpkg
def write_file (fn : string) (cnts : string) (mode := io.mode.write) : io unit := do
h ← io.mk_file_handle fn io.mode.write,
io.fs.write h cnts.to_char_buffer,
io.fs.close h
def read_manifest : io manifest := do
m ← manifest.from_file leanpkg_toml_fn,
when (m.lean_version ≠ lean_version_string) $
io.print_ln $ "\nWARNING: Lean version mismatch: installed version is " ++ lean_version_string
++ ", but package requires " ++ m.lean_version ++ "\n",
return m
def write_manifest (d : manifest) (fn := leanpkg_toml_fn) : io unit :=
write_file fn (repr d)
-- TODO(gabriel): implement a cross-platform api
def get_dot_lean_dir : io string := do
some home ← io.env.get "HOME" | io.fail "environment variable HOME is not set",
return $ home ++ "/.lean"
-- TODO(gabriel): file existence testing
def exists_file (f : string) : io bool := do
ch ← io.proc.spawn { cmd := "test", args := ["-f", f] },
ev ← io.proc.wait ch,
return $ ev = 0
def mk_path_file : ∀ (paths : list string), string
| [] := "builtin_path\n"
| (x :: xs) := mk_path_file xs ++ "path " ++ x ++ "\n"
def configure : io unit := do
d ← read_manifest,
io.put_str_ln $ "configuring " ++ d.name ++ " " ++ d.version,
when (d.path ≠ some "src") $ io.put_str_ln "WARNING: leanpkg configurations not specifying `path = \"src\"` are deprecated.",
assg ← solve_deps d,
path_file_cnts ← mk_path_file <$> construct_path assg,
write_file "leanpkg.path" path_file_cnts
def make (lean_args : list string) : io unit := do
manifest ← read_manifest,
exec_cmd {
cmd := "lean",
args := (match manifest.timeout with some t := ["-T", repr t] | none := [] end) ++
["--make"] ++ manifest.effective_path ++ lean_args,
env := [("LEAN_PATH", none)]
}
def build (lean_args : list string) := configure >> make lean_args
def make_test (lean_args : list string) : io unit :=
exec_cmd { cmd := "lean", args := ["--make", "test"] ++ lean_args, env := [("LEAN_PATH", none)] }
def test (lean_args : list string) := build lean_args >> make_test lean_args
def init_gitignore_contents :=
"*.olean
/_target
/leanpkg.path
"
def init_pkg (n : string) (from_new : bool) : io unit := do
write_manifest { name := n, path := "src", version := "0.1" } leanpkg_toml_fn,
src_ex ← dir_exists "src",
when (¬src_ex) (do
when ¬from_new $ io.put_str_ln "Move existing .lean files into the 'src' folder.",
exec_cmd {cmd := "mkdir", args := ["src"]}),
write_file ".gitignore" init_gitignore_contents io.mode.append,
git_ex ← dir_exists ".git",
when (¬git_ex) (do {
exec_cmd {cmd := "git", args := ["init", "-q"]},
when (upstream_git_branch ≠ "master") $
exec_cmd {cmd := "git", args := ["checkout", "-b", upstream_git_branch]}
} <|> io.print_ln "WARNING: failed to initialize git repository"),
configure
def init (n : string) := init_pkg n false
-- TODO(gabriel): windows
def basename (s : string) : string :=
s.fold "" $ λ s c, if c = '/' then "" else s.str c
def add_dep_to_manifest (dep : dependency) : io unit := do
d ← read_manifest,
let d' := { d with dependencies := d.dependencies.filter (λ old_dep, old_dep.name ≠ dep.name) ++ [dep] },
write_manifest d'
def strip_dot_git (url : string) : string :=
if url.backn 4 = ".git" then url.popn_back 4 else url
def looks_like_git_url (dep : string) : bool :=
':' ∈ dep.to_list
def parse_add_dep (dep : string) : io dependency :=
if looks_like_git_url dep then
pure { name := basename (strip_dot_git dep), src := source.git dep upstream_git_branch }
else do
ex ← dir_exists dep,
if ex then
pure { name := basename dep, src := source.path dep }
else do
[user, repo] ← pure $ dep.split (= '/')
| io.fail sformat!"path '{dep}' does not exist",
pure { name := repo, src := source.git sformat!"https://github.com/{user}/{repo}" upstream_git_branch }
def absolutize_dep (dep : dependency) : io dependency :=
match dep.src with
| source.path p := do
cwd ← io.env.get_cwd,
pure {src := source.path (resolve_dir p cwd), ..dep}
| _ := pure dep
end
def fixup_git_version (dir : string) : ∀ (src : source), io source
| (source.git url _) := source.git url <$> git_head_revision dir
| src := return src
def add (dep : dependency) : io unit := do
(_, assg) ← materialize "." dep assignment.empty,
some downloaded_path ← return (assg.find dep.name),
manif ← manifest.from_file (downloaded_path ++ "/" ++ leanpkg_toml_fn),
src ← fixup_git_version downloaded_path dep.src,
let dep := { dep with name := manif.name, src := src },
add_dep_to_manifest dep,
configure
def new (dir : string) := do
ex ← dir_exists dir,
when ex $ io.fail $ "directory already exists: " ++ dir,
exec_cmd {cmd := "mkdir", args := ["-p", dir]},
change_dir dir,
init_pkg (basename dir) true
def upgrade_dep (assg : assignment) (d : dependency) : io dependency :=
match d.src with
| (source.git url rev) := (do
some path ← return (assg.find d.name) | io.fail "unresolved dependency",
new_rev ← git_latest_origin_revision path,
return {d with src := source.git url new_rev})
<|> return d
| _ := return d
end
def upgrade := do
m ← read_manifest,
assg ← solve_deps m,
ds' ← m.dependencies.mmap (upgrade_dep assg),
write_manifest {m with dependencies := ds'},
configure
def usage :=
"Lean package manager, version " ++ ui_lean_version_string ++ "
Usage: leanpkg <command>
configure download dependencies
build [-- <lean-args>] download dependencies and build *.olean files
test [-- <lean-args>] download dependencies, build *.olean files, and run test files
new <dir> create a Lean package in a new directory
init <name> create a Lean package in the current directory
add <url> add a dependency from a git repository (uses latest upstream revision)
add <dir> add a local dependency
upgrade upgrade all git dependencies to the latest upstream version
install <url> install a user-wide package from git
install <dir> install a user-wide package from a local directory
dump print the parsed leanpkg.toml file (for debugging)
See `leanpkg help <command>` for more information on a specific command."
def main : ∀ (cmd : string) (leanpkg_args lean_args : list string), io unit
| "configure" [] [] := configure
| "build" _ lean_args := build lean_args
| "test" _ lean_args := test lean_args
| "new" [dir] [] := new dir
| "init" [name] [] := init name
| "add" [dep] [] := parse_add_dep dep >>= add
| "upgrade" [] [] := upgrade
| "install" [dep] [] := do
dep ← parse_add_dep dep,
dep ← absolutize_dep dep,
dot_lean_dir ← get_dot_lean_dir,
exec_cmd {cmd := "mkdir", args := ["-p", dot_lean_dir]},
let user_toml_fn := dot_lean_dir ++ "/" ++ leanpkg_toml_fn,
ex ← exists_file user_toml_fn,
when (¬ ex) $ write_manifest {
name := "_user_local_packages",
version := "1"
} user_toml_fn,
change_dir dot_lean_dir,
add dep,
build []
| "dump" [] [] := read_manifest >>= io.print_ln ∘ repr
| "help" ["configure"] [] := io.print_ln "Download dependencies
Usage:
leanpkg configure
This command sets up the `_target/deps` directory and the `leanpkg.path` file.
For each (transitive) git dependency, the specified commit is checked out
into a sub-directory of `_target/deps`. If there are dependencies on multiple
versions of the same package, the version materialized is undefined.
The `leanpkg.path` file used to resolve Lean imports is populated with paths
to the `src` directories of all (transitive) dependencies. No copy is made
of local dependencies."
| "help" ["build"] [] := io.print_ln "Download dependencies and build *.olean files
Usage:
leanpkg build [-- <lean-args>]
This command invokes `leanpkg configure` followed by
`lean --make src <lean-args>`, building the package's Lean files as well as
(transitively) imported files of dependencies. If defined, the `package.timeout`
configuration value is passed to Lean via its `-T` parameter."
| "help" ["test"] [] := io.print_ln "Download dependencies, build *.olean files, and run test files
Usage:
leanpkg test [-- <lean-args>]
This command invokes `leanpkg build <lean-args>` followed by
`lean --make test <lean-args>`, executing the package's test files. A failed
test should generate a Lean error message, which makes this command return a
non-zero exit code."
| "help" ["add"] [] := io.print_ln sformat!"Add a dependency
Usage:
leanpkg add <local-path>
leanpkg add <git-url>
leanpkg add <github-user>/<github-repo>
Examples:
leanpkg add ../mathlib
leanpkg add https://github.com/leanprover/mathlib
leanpkg add leanprover/mathlib
This command adds the specified local or git dependency, then calls
`leanpkg configure`. For git dependencies, the pinned commit is
the head of the branch `lean-<version>` (e.g. `lean-3.3.0`) on stable
releases of Lean, or else `master` (current branch: {upstream_git_branch})."
| "help" ["new"] [] := io.print_ln "Create a new Lean package in a new directory
Usage:
leanpkg new <path>/.../<name>
This command creates a new Lean package named '<name>' in a new directory
`<path>/.../<name>`. A new git repository is initialized to the branch name
expected by `leanpkg add` (see `leanpkg help add`).
For converting an existing directory into a Lean package, use `leanpkg init`."
| "help" ["init"] [] := io.print_ln "Create a new Lean package in the current directory
Usage:
leanpkg init <name>
This command creates a new Lean package with the given name in the current
directory. Existing Lean source files should be moved into the new `src`
directory."
| "help" ["upgrade"] [] := io.print_ln "Upgrade all git dependencies to the latest upstream version
Usage:
leanpkg upgrade
This command fetches the remote repositories of all git dependencies and updates
the pinned commits to the head of the respective branch (see
`leanpkg help add`)."
| "help" ["install"] [] := io.print_ln "Install a user-wide package
Usage:
leanpkg install <local-path>
leanpkg install <git-url>
leanpkg install <github-user>/<github-repo>
This command adds a dependency to a user-wide \"meta\" package in `~/.lean`.
For files not part of a Lean package, Lean falls back to the core library
and this meta package for import resolution.
For removing or upgrading user-wide dependencies, you currently have to change
into `~/.lean` yourself and edit the leanpkg.toml file or execute
`leanpkg upgrade`, respectively."
| "help" _ [] := io.print_ln usage
| _ _ _ := io.fail usage
private def split_cmdline_args_core : list string → list string × list string
| [] := ([], [])
| (arg::args) := if arg = "--"
then ([], args)
else match split_cmdline_args_core args with
| (outer_args, inner_args) := (arg::outer_args, inner_args)
end
def split_cmdline_args : list string → io (string × list string × list string)
| [] := io.fail usage
| [cmd] := return (cmd, [], [])
| (cmd::rest) := match split_cmdline_args_core rest with
| (outer_args, inner_args) := return (cmd, outer_args, inner_args)
end
end leanpkg
def main : io unit :=
do (cmd, outer_args, inner_args) ← io.cmdline_args >>= leanpkg.split_cmdline_args,
leanpkg.main cmd outer_args inner_args
|
1fcd867aebd541cfc45e388883107eda49f91c83 | 9028d228ac200bbefe3a711342514dd4e4458bff | /src/data/real/ennreal.lean | bb2ac99fb8586eaad15800116ab266c00e517d70 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mcncm/mathlib | 8d25099344d9d2bee62822cb9ed43aa3e09fa05e | fde3d78cadeec5ef827b16ae55664ef115e66f57 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,743,316,277 | 1,602,618,514,000 | 1,602,618,514,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 48,611 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
Extended non-negative reals
-/
import data.real.nnreal
import data.set.intervals
noncomputable theory
open classical set
open_locale classical big_operators
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- The extended nonnegative real numbers. This is usually denoted [0, ∞],
and is relevant as the codomain of a measure. -/
@[derive canonically_ordered_comm_semiring, derive complete_linear_order, derive densely_ordered]
def ennreal := with_top nnreal
localized "notation `∞` := (⊤ : ennreal)" in ennreal
namespace ennreal
variables {a b c d : ennreal} {r p q : nnreal}
instance : inhabited ennreal := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_coe nnreal ennreal := ⟨ option.some ⟩
instance : can_lift ennreal nnreal :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := λ r, r ≠ ∞,
prf := λ x hx, ⟨option.get $ option.ne_none_iff_is_some.1 hx, option.some_get _⟩ }
@[simp] lemma none_eq_top : (none : ennreal) = (⊤ : ennreal) := rfl
@[simp] lemma some_eq_coe (a : nnreal) : (some a : ennreal) = (↑a : ennreal) := rfl
/-- `to_nnreal x` returns `x` if it is real, otherwise 0. -/
protected def to_nnreal : ennreal → nnreal
| (some r) := r
| none := 0
/-- `to_real x` returns `x` if it is real, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def to_real (a : ennreal) : real := coe (a.to_nnreal)
/-- `of_real x` returns `x` if it is nonnegative, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def of_real (r : real) : ennreal := coe (nnreal.of_real r)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma to_nnreal_coe : (r : ennreal).to_nnreal = r := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_nnreal : ∀{a:ennreal}, a ≠ ∞ → ↑(a.to_nnreal) = a
| (some r) h := rfl
| none h := (h rfl).elim
@[simp] lemma of_real_to_real {a : ennreal} (h : a ≠ ∞) : ennreal.of_real (a.to_real) = a :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.of_real, h]
@[simp] lemma to_real_of_real {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : ennreal.to_real (ennreal.of_real r) = r :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.of_real, nnreal.coe_of_real _ h]
lemma to_real_of_real' {r : ℝ} : ennreal.to_real (ennreal.of_real r) = max r 0 := rfl
lemma coe_to_nnreal_le_self : ∀{a:ennreal}, ↑(a.to_nnreal) ≤ a
| (some r) := by rw [some_eq_coe, to_nnreal_coe]; exact le_refl _
| none := le_top
lemma coe_nnreal_eq (r : nnreal) : (r : ennreal) = ennreal.of_real r :=
by { rw [ennreal.of_real, nnreal.of_real], cases r with r h, congr, dsimp, rw max_eq_left h }
lemma of_real_eq_coe_nnreal {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) :
ennreal.of_real x = @coe nnreal ennreal _ (⟨x, h⟩ : nnreal) :=
by { rw [coe_nnreal_eq], refl }
@[simp] lemma of_real_coe_nnreal : ennreal.of_real p = p := (coe_nnreal_eq p).symm
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ↑(0 : nnreal) = (0 : ennreal) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ↑(1 : nnreal) = (1 : ennreal) := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_real_nonneg {a : ennreal} : 0 ≤ a.to_real := by simp [ennreal.to_real]
@[simp] lemma top_to_nnreal : ∞.to_nnreal = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma top_to_real : ∞.to_real = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_to_real : (1 : ennreal).to_real = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_to_nnreal : (1 : ennreal).to_nnreal = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_real (r : nnreal) : (r : ennreal).to_real = r := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_to_nnreal : (0 : ennreal).to_nnreal = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_to_real : (0 : ennreal).to_real = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_real_zero : ennreal.of_real (0 : ℝ) = 0 :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]; refl
@[simp] lemma of_real_one : ennreal.of_real (1 : ℝ) = (1 : ennreal) :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
lemma of_real_to_real_le {a : ennreal} : ennreal.of_real (a.to_real) ≤ a :=
if ha : a = ∞ then ha.symm ▸ le_top else le_of_eq (of_real_to_real ha)
lemma forall_ennreal {p : ennreal → Prop} : (∀a, p a) ↔ (∀r:nnreal, p r) ∧ p ∞ :=
⟨assume h, ⟨assume r, h _, h _⟩,
assume ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ a, match a with some r := h₁ _ | none := h₂ end⟩
lemma to_nnreal_eq_zero_iff (x : ennreal) : x.to_nnreal = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ⊤ :=
⟨begin
cases x,
{ simp [none_eq_top] },
{ have A : some (0:nnreal) = (0:ennreal) := rfl,
simp [ennreal.to_nnreal, A] {contextual := tt} }
end,
by intro h; cases h; simp [h]⟩
lemma to_real_eq_zero_iff (x : ennreal) : x.to_real = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ⊤ :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, to_nnreal_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma coe_ne_top : (r : ennreal) ≠ ∞ := with_top.coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_coe : ∞ ≠ (r : ennreal) := with_top.top_ne_coe
@[simp] lemma of_real_ne_top {r : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real r ≠ ∞ := by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_lt_top {r : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real r < ∞ := lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 of_real_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_of_real {r : ℝ} : ∞ ≠ ennreal.of_real r := by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma zero_ne_top : 0 ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_zero : ∞ ≠ 0 := top_ne_coe
@[simp] lemma one_ne_top : 1 ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_one : ∞ ≠ 1 := top_ne_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_coe : (↑r : ennreal) = ↑q ↔ r = q := with_top.coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_coe : (↑r : ennreal) ≤ ↑q ↔ r ≤ q := with_top.coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_coe : (↑r : ennreal) < ↑q ↔ r < q := with_top.coe_lt_coe
lemma coe_mono : monotone (coe : nnreal → ennreal) := λ _ _, coe_le_coe.2
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_zero : (↑r : ennreal) = 0 ↔ r = 0 := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma zero_eq_coe : 0 = (↑r : ennreal) ↔ 0 = r := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_one : (↑r : ennreal) = 1 ↔ r = 1 := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_eq_coe : 1 = (↑r : ennreal) ↔ 1 = r := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nonneg : 0 ≤ (↑r : ennreal) ↔ 0 ≤ r := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pos : 0 < (↑r : ennreal) ↔ 0 < r := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add : ↑(r + p) = (r + p : ennreal) := with_top.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul : ↑(r * p) = (r * p : ennreal) := with_top.coe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bit0 : (↑(bit0 r) : ennreal) = bit0 r := coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bit1 : (↑(bit1 r) : ennreal) = bit1 r := by simp [bit1]
lemma coe_two : ((2:nnreal) : ennreal) = 2 := by norm_cast
protected lemma zero_lt_one : 0 < (1 : ennreal) :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.zero_lt_one
@[simp] lemma one_lt_two : (1:ennreal) < 2 := coe_one ▸ coe_two ▸ by exact_mod_cast one_lt_two
@[simp] lemma zero_lt_two : (0:ennreal) < 2 := lt_trans ennreal.zero_lt_one one_lt_two
lemma two_ne_zero : (2:ennreal) ≠ 0 := (ne_of_lt zero_lt_two).symm
lemma two_ne_top : (2:ennreal) ≠ ∞ := coe_two ▸ coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma add_top : a + ∞ = ∞ := with_top.add_top
@[simp] lemma top_add : ∞ + a = ∞ := with_top.top_add
/-- Coercion `ℝ≥0 → ennreal` as a `ring_hom`. -/
def of_nnreal_hom : nnreal →+* ennreal :=
⟨coe, coe_one, λ _ _, coe_mul, coe_zero, λ _ _, coe_add⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_of_nnreal_hom : ⇑of_nnreal_hom = coe := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_indicator {α} (s : set α) (f : α → nnreal) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : nnreal) : ennreal) = s.indicator (λ x, f x) a :=
(of_nnreal_hom : nnreal →+ ennreal).map_indicator _ _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (n : ℕ) : (↑(r^n) : ennreal) = r^n :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_pow r n
lemma add_eq_top : a + b = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ ∨ b = ∞ := with_top.add_eq_top _ _
lemma add_lt_top : a + b < ∞ ↔ a < ∞ ∧ b < ∞ := with_top.add_lt_top _ _
lemma to_nnreal_add {r₁ r₂ : ennreal} (h₁ : r₁ < ⊤) (h₂ : r₂ < ⊤) :
(r₁ + r₂).to_nnreal = r₁.to_nnreal + r₂.to_nnreal :=
begin
rw [← coe_eq_coe, coe_add, coe_to_nnreal, coe_to_nnreal, coe_to_nnreal];
apply @ne_top_of_lt ennreal _ _ ⊤,
exact h₂,
exact h₁,
exact add_lt_top.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
end
/- rw has trouble with the generic lt_top_iff_ne_top and bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
(contrary to erw). This is solved with the next lemmas -/
protected lemma lt_top_iff_ne_top : a < ∞ ↔ a ≠ ∞ := lt_top_iff_ne_top
protected lemma bot_lt_iff_ne_bot : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
lemma not_lt_top {x : ennreal} : ¬ x < ∞ ↔ x = ∞ := by rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, not_not]
lemma add_ne_top : a + b ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ :=
by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using add_lt_top
lemma mul_top : a * ∞ = (if a = 0 then 0 else ∞) :=
begin split_ifs, { simp [h] }, { exact with_top.mul_top h } end
lemma top_mul : ∞ * a = (if a = 0 then 0 else ∞) :=
begin split_ifs, { simp [h] }, { exact with_top.top_mul h } end
@[simp] lemma top_mul_top : ∞ * ∞ = ∞ := with_top.top_mul_top
lemma top_pow {n:ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : ∞^n = ∞ :=
nat.le_induction (pow_one _) (λ m hm hm', by rw [pow_succ, hm', top_mul_top])
_ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h)
lemma mul_eq_top : a * b = ⊤ ↔ (a ≠ 0 ∧ b = ⊤) ∨ (a = ⊤ ∧ b ≠ 0) :=
with_top.mul_eq_top_iff
lemma mul_ne_top : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → a * b ≠ ∞ :=
by simp [(≠), mul_eq_top] {contextual := tt}
lemma mul_lt_top : a < ⊤ → b < ⊤ → a * b < ⊤ :=
by simpa only [ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top] using mul_ne_top
lemma ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left (h : a * b ≠ ⊤) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a ≠ ⊤ :=
by { simp [mul_eq_top, hb, not_or_distrib] at h ⊢, exact h.2 }
lemma ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_right (h : a * b ≠ ⊤) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left (by rwa [mul_comm]) ha
lemma lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left (h : a * b < ⊤) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a < ⊤ :=
by { rw [ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top] at h ⊢, exact ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left h hb }
lemma lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_right (h : a * b < ⊤) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b < ⊤ :=
lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left (by rwa [mul_comm]) ha
lemma mul_lt_top_iff {a b : ennreal} : a * b < ⊤ ↔ (a < ⊤ ∧ b < ⊤) ∨ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, rw [← or_assoc, or_iff_not_imp_right, or_iff_not_imp_right], intros hb ha,
exact ⟨lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left h hb, lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_right h ha⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨ha, hb⟩|rfl|rfl); [exact mul_lt_top ha hb, simp, simp] }
end
@[simp] lemma mul_pos : 0 < a * b ↔ 0 < a ∧ 0 < b :=
by simp only [zero_lt_iff_ne_zero, ne.def, mul_eq_zero, not_or_distrib]
lemma pow_eq_top : ∀ n:ℕ, a^n=∞ → a=∞
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := λ o, (mul_eq_top.1 o).elim (λ h, pow_eq_top n h.2) and.left
lemma pow_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) {n:ℕ} : a^n ≠ ∞ :=
mt (pow_eq_top n) h
lemma pow_lt_top : a < ∞ → ∀ n:ℕ, a^n < ∞ :=
by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using pow_ne_top
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_finset_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → nnreal} :
↑(∑ a in s, f a) = (∑ a in s, f a : ennreal) :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_sum f s
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_finset_prod {s : finset α} {f : α → nnreal} :
↑(∏ a in s, f a) = ((∏ a in s, f a) : ennreal) :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_prod f s
section order
@[simp] lemma bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : ennreal) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_lt_top : coe r < ∞ := with_top.coe_lt_top r
@[simp] lemma not_top_le_coe : ¬ (⊤:ennreal) ≤ ↑r := with_top.not_top_le_coe r
lemma zero_lt_coe_iff : 0 < (↑p : ennreal) ↔ 0 < p := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_le_coe_iff : (1:ennreal) ≤ ↑r ↔ 1 ≤ r := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_one_iff : ↑r ≤ (1:ennreal) ↔ r ≤ 1 := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_one_iff : (↑p : ennreal) < 1 ↔ p < 1 := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_lt_coe_iff : 1 < (↑p : ennreal) ↔ 1 < p := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nat (n : nat) : ((n : nnreal) : ennreal) = n := with_top.coe_nat n
@[simp] lemma nat_ne_top (n : nat) : (n : ennreal) ≠ ⊤ := with_top.nat_ne_top n
@[simp] lemma top_ne_nat (n : nat) : (⊤ : ennreal) ≠ n := with_top.top_ne_nat n
@[simp] lemma one_lt_top : 1 < ∞ := coe_lt_top
lemma le_coe_iff : a ≤ ↑r ↔ (∃p:nnreal, a = p ∧ p ≤ r) := with_top.le_coe_iff r a
lemma coe_le_iff : ↑r ≤ a ↔ (∀p:nnreal, a = p → r ≤ p) := with_top.coe_le_iff r a
lemma lt_iff_exists_coe : a < b ↔ (∃p:nnreal, a = p ∧ ↑p < b) := with_top.lt_iff_exists_coe a b
lemma pow_le_pow {n m : ℕ} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m :=
begin
cases a,
{ cases m,
{ rw eq_bot_iff.mpr h,
exact le_refl _ },
{ rw [none_eq_top, top_pow (nat.succ_pos m)],
exact le_top } },
{ rw [some_eq_coe, ← coe_pow, ← coe_pow, coe_le_coe],
exact pow_le_pow (by simpa using ha) h }
end
@[simp] lemma max_eq_zero_iff : max a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
by simp only [le_zero_iff_eq.symm, max_le_iff]
@[simp] lemma max_zero_left : max 0 a = a := max_eq_right (zero_le a)
@[simp] lemma max_zero_right : max a 0 = a := max_eq_left (zero_le a)
-- TODO: why this is not a `rfl`? There is some hidden diamond here.
@[simp] lemma sup_eq_max : a ⊔ b = max a b :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, sup_le_iff.trans max_le_iff.symm
protected lemma pow_pos : 0 < a → ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < a^n :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.pow_pos
protected lemma pow_ne_zero : a ≠ 0 → ∀ n : ℕ, a^n ≠ 0 :=
by simpa only [zero_lt_iff_ne_zero] using ennreal.pow_pos
@[simp] lemma not_lt_zero : ¬ a < 0 := by simp
lemma add_lt_add_iff_left : a < ⊤ → (a + c < a + b ↔ c < b) :=
with_top.add_lt_add_iff_left
lemma add_lt_add_iff_right : a < ⊤ → (c + a < b + a ↔ c < b) :=
with_top.add_lt_add_iff_right
lemma lt_add_right (ha : a < ⊤) (hb : 0 < b) : a < a + b :=
by rwa [← add_lt_add_iff_left ha, add_zero] at hb
lemma le_of_forall_epsilon_le : ∀{a b : ennreal}, (∀ε:nnreal, 0 < ε → b < ∞ → a ≤ b + ε) → a ≤ b
| a none h := le_top
| none (some a) h :=
have (⊤:ennreal) ≤ ↑a + ↑(1:nnreal), from h 1 zero_lt_one coe_lt_top,
by rw [← coe_add] at this; exact (not_top_le_coe this).elim
| (some a) (some b) h :=
by simp only [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, coe_add.symm, coe_le_coe, coe_lt_top, true_implies_iff]
at *; exact nnreal.le_of_forall_epsilon_le h
lemma lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃q:ℚ, 0 ≤ q ∧ a < nnreal.of_real q ∧ (nnreal.of_real q:ennreal) < b) :=
⟨λ h,
begin
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 h with ⟨p, rfl, _⟩,
rcases exists_between h with ⟨c, pc, cb⟩,
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 cb with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩,
rcases (nnreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn _ _).1 (coe_lt_coe.1 pc) with ⟨q, hq0, pq, qr⟩,
exact ⟨q, hq0, coe_lt_coe.2 pq, lt_trans (coe_lt_coe.2 qr) cb⟩
end,
λ ⟨q, q0, qa, qb⟩, lt_trans qa qb⟩
lemma lt_iff_exists_real_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃r:ℝ, 0 ≤ r ∧ a < ennreal.of_real r ∧ (ennreal.of_real r:ennreal) < b) :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨q, q0, aq, qb⟩ := ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn.1 h in
⟨q, rat.cast_nonneg.2 q0, aq, qb⟩,
λ ⟨q, q0, qa, qb⟩, lt_trans qa qb⟩
lemma lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃r:nnreal, a < r ∧ (r : ennreal) < b) :=
with_top.lt_iff_exists_coe_btwn
lemma lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt : a < b ↔ (∃ r : nnreal, 0 < r ∧ a + r < b) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hab, _, λ ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right (le_refl _)) hr⟩,
cases a, { simpa using hab },
rcases lt_iff_exists_real_btwn.1 hab with ⟨c, c_nonneg, ac, cb⟩,
let d : nnreal := ⟨c, c_nonneg⟩,
have ad : a < d,
{ rw of_real_eq_coe_nnreal c_nonneg at ac,
exact coe_lt_coe.1 ac },
refine ⟨d-a, nnreal.sub_pos.2 ad, _⟩,
rw [some_eq_coe, ← coe_add],
convert cb,
have : nnreal.of_real c = d,
by { rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, nnreal.coe_of_real _ c_nonneg], refl },
rw [add_comm, this],
exact nnreal.sub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt ad)
end
lemma coe_nat_lt_coe {n : ℕ} : (n : ennreal) < r ↔ ↑n < r := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_lt_coe
lemma coe_lt_coe_nat {n : ℕ} : (r : ennreal) < n ↔ r < n := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_lt_coe
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_nat_lt_coe_nat {m n : ℕ} : (m : ennreal) < n ↔ m < n :=
ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_nat_lt_coe.trans nat.cast_lt
lemma coe_nat_ne_top {n : ℕ} : (n : ennreal) ≠ ∞ := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_ne_top
lemma coe_nat_mono : strict_mono (coe : ℕ → ennreal) := λ _ _, coe_nat_lt_coe_nat.2
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_nat_le_coe_nat {m n : ℕ} : (m : ennreal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
coe_nat_mono.le_iff_le
instance : char_zero ennreal := ⟨coe_nat_mono.injective⟩
protected lemma exists_nat_gt {r : ennreal} (h : r ≠ ⊤) : ∃n:ℕ, r < n :=
begin
lift r to nnreal using h,
rcases exists_nat_gt r with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact ⟨n, coe_lt_coe_nat.2 hn⟩,
end
lemma add_lt_add (ac : a < c) (bd : b < d) : a + b < c + d :=
begin
rcases exists_between ac with ⟨a', aa', a'c⟩,
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 aa' with ⟨aR, rfl, _⟩,
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 a'c with ⟨a'R, rfl, _⟩,
rcases exists_between bd with ⟨b', bb', b'd⟩,
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 bb' with ⟨bR, rfl, _⟩,
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 b'd with ⟨b'R, rfl, _⟩,
have I : ↑aR + ↑bR < ↑a'R + ↑b'R :=
begin
rw [← coe_add, ← coe_add, coe_lt_coe],
apply add_lt_add (coe_lt_coe.1 aa') (coe_lt_coe.1 bb')
end,
have J : ↑a'R + ↑b'R ≤ c + d := add_le_add (le_of_lt a'c) (le_of_lt b'd),
apply lt_of_lt_of_le I J
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_min : ((min r p:nnreal):ennreal) = min r p :=
coe_mono.map_min
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_max : ((max r p:nnreal):ennreal) = max r p :=
coe_mono.map_max
end order
section complete_lattice
lemma coe_Sup {s : set nnreal} : bdd_above s → (↑(Sup s) : ennreal) = (⨆a∈s, ↑a) := with_top.coe_Sup
lemma coe_Inf {s : set nnreal} : s.nonempty → (↑(Inf s) : ennreal) = (⨅a∈s, ↑a) := with_top.coe_Inf
@[simp] lemma top_mem_upper_bounds {s : set ennreal} : ∞ ∈ upper_bounds s :=
assume x hx, le_top
lemma coe_mem_upper_bounds {s : set nnreal} :
↑r ∈ upper_bounds ((coe : nnreal → ennreal) '' s) ↔ r ∈ upper_bounds s :=
by simp [upper_bounds, ball_image_iff, -mem_image, *] {contextual := tt}
lemma infi_ennreal {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] {f : ennreal → α} :
(⨅n, f n) = (⨅n:nnreal, f n) ⊓ f ⊤ :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf (le_infi $ assume i, infi_le _ _) (infi_le _ _))
(le_infi $ forall_ennreal.2 ⟨assume r, inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le _ _, inf_le_right⟩)
end complete_lattice
section mul
lemma mul_le_mul : a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a * c ≤ b * d :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul
lemma mul_left_mono : monotone ((*) a) := λ b c, mul_le_mul (le_refl a)
lemma mul_right_mono : monotone (λ x, x * a) := λ b c h, mul_le_mul h (le_refl a)
lemma max_mul : max a b * c = max (a * c) (b * c) :=
mul_right_mono.map_max
lemma mul_max : a * max b c = max (a * b) (a * c) :=
mul_left_mono.map_max
lemma mul_eq_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ⊤ → (a * b = a * c ↔ b = c) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; cases c;
simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm,
nnreal.mul_eq_mul_left] {contextual := tt},
end
lemma mul_eq_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c = b * c ↔ a = b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_eq_mul_left
lemma mul_le_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ⊤ → (a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; cases c;
simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm] {contextual := tt},
assume h, exact mul_le_mul_left (zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
end
lemma mul_le_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c ≤ b * c ↔ a ≤ b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_le_mul_left
lemma mul_lt_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ⊤ → (a * b < a * c ↔ b < c) :=
λ h0 ht, by simp only [mul_le_mul_left h0 ht, lt_iff_le_not_le]
lemma mul_lt_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c < b * c ↔ a < b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_lt_mul_left
end mul
section sub
instance : has_sub ennreal := ⟨λa b, Inf {d | a ≤ d + b}⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_sub : ↑(p - r) = (↑p:ennreal) - r :=
le_antisymm
(le_Inf $ assume b (hb : ↑p ≤ b + r), coe_le_iff.2 $
by rintros d rfl; rwa [← coe_add, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.sub_le_iff_le_add] at hb)
(Inf_le $ show (↑p : ennreal) ≤ ↑(p - r) + ↑r,
by rw [← coe_add, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.sub_le_iff_le_add])
@[simp] lemma top_sub_coe : ∞ - ↑r = ∞ :=
top_unique $ le_Inf $ by simp [add_eq_top]
@[simp] lemma sub_eq_zero_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : a - b = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ le_add_left h) (zero_le _)
@[simp] lemma sub_self : a - a = 0 := sub_eq_zero_of_le $ le_refl _
@[simp] lemma zero_sub : 0 - a = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ zero_le $ 0 + a) (zero_le _)
@[simp] lemma sub_infty : a - ∞ = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ by simp) (zero_le _)
lemma sub_le_sub (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : d ≤ c) : a - c ≤ b - d :=
Inf_le_Inf $ assume e (h : b ≤ e + d),
calc a ≤ b : h₁
... ≤ e + d : h
... ≤ e + c : add_le_add (le_refl _) h₂
@[simp] lemma add_sub_self : ∀{a b : ennreal}, b < ∞ → (a + b) - b = a
| a none := by simp [none_eq_top]
| none (some b) := by simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe]
| (some a) (some b) :=
by simp [some_eq_coe]; rw [← coe_add, ← coe_sub, coe_eq_coe, nnreal.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] lemma add_sub_self' (h : a < ∞) : (a + b) - a = b :=
by rw [add_comm, add_sub_self h]
lemma add_right_inj (h : a < ∞) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
⟨λ e, by simpa [h] using congr_arg (λ x, x - a) e, congr_arg _⟩
lemma add_left_inj (h : a < ∞) : b + a = c + a ↔ b = c :=
by rw [add_comm, add_comm c, add_right_inj h]
@[simp] lemma sub_add_cancel_of_le : ∀{a b : ennreal}, b ≤ a → (a - b) + b = a :=
begin
simp [forall_ennreal, le_coe_iff, -add_comm] {contextual := tt},
rintros r p x rfl h,
rw [← coe_sub, ← coe_add, nnreal.sub_add_cancel_of_le h]
end
@[simp] lemma add_sub_cancel_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
by rwa [add_comm, sub_add_cancel_of_le]
lemma sub_add_self_eq_max : (a - b) + b = max a b :=
match le_total a b with
| or.inl h := by simp [h, max_eq_right]
| or.inr h := by simp [h, max_eq_left]
end
lemma le_sub_add_self : a ≤ (a - b) + b :=
by { rw sub_add_self_eq_max, exact le_max_left a b }
@[simp] protected lemma sub_le_iff_le_add : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b :=
iff.intro
(assume h : a - b ≤ c,
calc a ≤ (a - b) + b : le_sub_add_self
... ≤ c + b : add_le_add_right h _)
(assume h : a ≤ c + b,
calc a - b ≤ (c + b) - b : sub_le_sub h (le_refl _)
... ≤ c : Inf_le (le_refl (c + b)))
protected lemma sub_le_iff_le_add' : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
add_comm c b ▸ ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add
lemma sub_eq_of_add_eq : b ≠ ∞ → a + b = c → c - b = a :=
λ hb hc, hc ▸ add_sub_self (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hb)
protected lemma sub_le_of_sub_le (h : a - b ≤ c) : a - c ≤ b :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ by { rw add_comm, exact ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 h }
protected lemma sub_lt_sub_self : a ≠ ⊤ → a ≠ 0 → 0 < b → a - b < a :=
match a, b with
| none, _ := by { have := none_eq_top, assume h, contradiction }
| (some a), none := by {intros, simp only [none_eq_top, sub_infty, zero_lt_iff_ne_zero], assumption}
| (some a), (some b) :=
begin
simp only [some_eq_coe, coe_sub.symm, coe_pos, coe_eq_zero, coe_lt_coe, ne.def],
assume h₁ h₂, apply nnreal.sub_lt_self, exact zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.2 h₂
end
end
@[simp] lemma sub_eq_zero_iff_le : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
by simpa [-ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add] using @ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add a b 0
@[simp] lemma zero_lt_sub_iff_lt : 0 < a - b ↔ b < a :=
by simpa [ennreal.bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, -sub_eq_zero_iff_le]
using not_iff_not.2 (@sub_eq_zero_iff_le a b)
lemma lt_sub_iff_add_lt : a < b - c ↔ a + c < b :=
begin
cases a, { simp },
cases c, { simp },
cases b, { simp only [true_iff, coe_lt_top, some_eq_coe, top_sub_coe, none_eq_top, ← coe_add] },
simp only [some_eq_coe],
rw [← coe_add, ← coe_sub, coe_lt_coe, coe_lt_coe, nnreal.lt_sub_iff_add_lt],
end
lemma sub_le_self (a b : ennreal) : a - b ≤ a :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ le_add_right (le_refl a)
@[simp] lemma sub_zero : a - 0 = a :=
eq.trans (add_zero (a - 0)).symm $ by simp
/-- A version of triangle inequality for difference as a "distance". -/
lemma sub_le_sub_add_sub : a - c ≤ a - b + (b - c) :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $
calc a ≤ a - b + b : le_sub_add_self
... ≤ a - b + ((b - c) + c) : add_le_add_left le_sub_add_self _
... = a - b + (b - c) + c : (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
lemma sub_sub_cancel (h : a < ∞) (h2 : b ≤ a) : a - (a - b) = b :=
by rw [← add_left_inj (lt_of_le_of_lt (sub_le_self _ _) h),
sub_add_cancel_of_le (sub_le_self _ _), add_sub_cancel_of_le h2]
lemma sub_right_inj {a b c : ennreal} (ha : a < ⊤) (hb : b ≤ a) (hc : c ≤ a) :
a - b = a - c ↔ b = c :=
iff.intro
begin
assume h, have : a - (a - b) = a - (a - c), rw h,
rw [sub_sub_cancel ha hb, sub_sub_cancel ha hc] at this, exact this
end
(λ h, by rw h)
lemma sub_mul (h : 0 < b → b < a → c ≠ ∞) : (a - b) * c = a * c - b * c :=
begin
cases le_or_lt a b with hab hab,
{ simp [hab, mul_right_mono hab] },
symmetry,
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le b) with hb hb,
{ subst b, simp },
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq,
{ exact mul_ne_top (ne_top_of_lt hab) (h hb hab) },
rw [← add_mul, sub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt hab)]
end
lemma mul_sub (h : 0 < c → c < b → a ≠ ∞) :
a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
by { simp only [mul_comm a], exact sub_mul h }
lemma sub_mul_ge : a * c - b * c ≤ (a - b) * c :=
begin
-- with `0 < b → b < a → c ≠ ∞` Lean names the first variable `a`
by_cases h : ∀ (hb : 0 < b), b < a → c ≠ ∞,
{ rw [sub_mul h],
exact le_refl _ },
{ push_neg at h,
rcases h with ⟨hb, hba, hc⟩,
subst c,
simp only [mul_top, if_neg (ne_of_gt hb), if_neg (ne_of_gt $ lt_trans hb hba), sub_self,
zero_le] }
end
end sub
section sum
open finset
/-- A sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top {s : finset α} {f : α → ennreal} :
(∀a∈s, f a < ⊤) → ∑ a in s, f a < ⊤ :=
with_top.sum_lt_top
/-- A sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top_iff {s : finset α} {f : α → ennreal} :
∑ a in s, f a < ⊤ ↔ (∀a∈s, f a < ⊤) :=
with_top.sum_lt_top_iff
/-- A sum of numbers is infinite iff one of them is infinite -/
lemma sum_eq_top_iff {s : finset α} {f : α → ennreal} :
(∑ x in s, f x) = ⊤ ↔ (∃a∈s, f a = ⊤) :=
with_top.sum_eq_top_iff
/-- seeing `ennreal` as `nnreal` does not change their sum, unless one of the `ennreal` is
infinity -/
lemma to_nnreal_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → ennreal} (hf : ∀a∈s, f a < ⊤) :
ennreal.to_nnreal (∑ a in s, f a) = ∑ a in s, ennreal.to_nnreal (f a) :=
begin
rw [← coe_eq_coe, coe_to_nnreal, coe_finset_sum, sum_congr],
{ refl },
{ intros x hx, rw coe_to_nnreal, rw ← ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top, exact hf x hx },
{ rw ← ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top, exact sum_lt_top hf }
end
/-- seeing `ennreal` as `real` does not change their sum, unless one of the `ennreal` is infinity -/
lemma to_real_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → ennreal} (hf : ∀a∈s, f a < ⊤) :
ennreal.to_real (∑ a in s, f a) = ∑ a in s, ennreal.to_real (f a) :=
by { rw [ennreal.to_real, to_nnreal_sum hf, nnreal.coe_sum], refl }
end sum
section interval
variables {x y z : ennreal} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ennreal} {s : set ennreal}
protected lemma Ico_eq_Iio : (Ico 0 y) = (Iio y) :=
ext $ assume a, iff.intro
(assume ⟨_, hx⟩, hx)
(assume hx, ⟨zero_le _, hx⟩)
lemma mem_Iio_self_add : x ≠ ⊤ → 0 < ε → x ∈ Iio (x + ε) :=
assume xt ε0, lt_add_right (by rwa lt_top_iff_ne_top) ε0
lemma not_mem_Ioo_self_sub : x = 0 → x ∉ Ioo (x - ε) y :=
assume x0, by simp [x0]
lemma mem_Ioo_self_sub_add : x ≠ ⊤ → x ≠ 0 → 0 < ε₁ → 0 < ε₂ → x ∈ Ioo (x - ε₁) (x + ε₂) :=
assume xt x0 ε0 ε0',
⟨ennreal.sub_lt_sub_self xt x0 ε0, lt_add_right (by rwa [lt_top_iff_ne_top]) ε0'⟩
end interval
section bit
@[simp] lemma bit0_inj : bit0 a = bit0 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨λh, begin
rcases (lt_trichotomy a b) with h₁| h₂| h₃,
{ exact (absurd h (ne_of_lt (add_lt_add h₁ h₁))) },
{ exact h₂ },
{ exact (absurd h.symm (ne_of_lt (add_lt_add h₃ h₃))) }
end,
λh, congr_arg _ h⟩
@[simp] lemma bit0_eq_zero_iff : bit0 a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simpa only [bit0_zero] using @bit0_inj a 0
@[simp] lemma bit0_eq_top_iff : bit0 a = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ :=
by rw [bit0, add_eq_top, or_self]
@[simp] lemma bit1_inj : bit1 a = bit1 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨λh, begin
unfold bit1 at h,
rwa [add_left_inj, bit0_inj] at h,
simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top]
end,
λh, congr_arg _ h⟩
@[simp] lemma bit1_ne_zero : bit1 a ≠ 0 :=
by unfold bit1; simp
@[simp] lemma bit1_eq_one_iff : bit1 a = 1 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simpa only [bit1_zero] using @bit1_inj a 0
@[simp] lemma bit1_eq_top_iff : bit1 a = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ :=
by unfold bit1; rw add_eq_top; simp
end bit
section inv
instance : has_inv ennreal := ⟨λa, Inf {b | 1 ≤ a * b}⟩
instance : has_div ennreal := ⟨λa b, a * b⁻¹⟩
lemma div_def : a / b = a * b⁻¹ := rfl
lemma mul_div_assoc : (a * b) / c = a * (b / c) :=
mul_assoc _ _ _
@[simp] lemma inv_zero : (0 : ennreal)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show Inf {b : ennreal | 1 ≤ 0 * b} = ∞, by simp; refl
@[simp] lemma inv_top : (∞ : ennreal)⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique $ le_of_forall_le_of_dense $ λ a (h : a > 0), Inf_le $ by simp [*, ne_of_gt h, top_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ennreal) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_antisymm
(le_Inf $ assume b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b), coe_le_iff.2 $
by rintros b rfl; rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.inv_le hr] at hb)
(Inf_le $ by simp; rw [← coe_mul, nnreal.mul_inv_cancel hr]; exact le_refl 1)
lemma coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ennreal) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
if hr : r = 0 then by simp only [hr, nnreal.inv_zero, inv_zero, coe_zero, zero_le]
else by simp only [coe_inv hr, le_refl]
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹:nnreal):ennreal) = 2⁻¹ :=
by rw [coe_inv (ne_of_gt _root_.zero_lt_two), coe_two]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ennreal) = p / r :=
show ↑(p * r⁻¹) = ↑p * (↑r)⁻¹, by rw [coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
@[simp] lemma inv_one : (1:ennreal)⁻¹ = 1 :=
by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_eq_coe.2 nnreal.inv_one
@[simp] lemma div_one {a : ennreal} : a / 1 = a :=
by simp [ennreal.div_def]
protected lemma inv_pow {n : ℕ} : (a^n)⁻¹ = (a⁻¹)^n :=
begin
by_cases a = 0; cases a; cases n; simp [*, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe,
zero_pow, top_pow, nat.zero_lt_succ] at *,
rw [← coe_inv h, ← coe_pow, ← coe_inv, nnreal.inv_pow, coe_pow],
rw [← ne.def] at h,
rw [← zero_lt_iff_ne_zero] at *,
apply pow_pos h
end
@[simp] lemma inv_inv : (a⁻¹)⁻¹ = a :=
by by_cases a = 0; cases a; simp [*, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe,
-coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm] at *
lemma inv_involutive : function.involutive (λ a:ennreal, a⁻¹) :=
λ a, ennreal.inv_inv
lemma inv_bijective : function.bijective (λ a:ennreal, a⁻¹) :=
ennreal.inv_involutive.bijective
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b := inv_bijective.1.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 :=
inv_zero ▸ inv_eq_inv
lemma inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_top {x : ennreal} : x⁻¹ < ⊤ ↔ 0 < x :=
by { simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, zero_lt_iff_ne_zero] }
lemma div_lt_top {x y : ennreal} (h1 : x < ⊤) (h2 : 0 < y) : x / y < ⊤ :=
mul_lt_top h1 (inv_lt_top.mpr h2)
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_eq_inv
lemma inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
@[simp] lemma inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ a ≠ ∞ :=
zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.trans inv_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_inv : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
begin
cases a; cases b; simp only [some_eq_coe, none_eq_top, inv_top],
{ simp only [lt_irrefl] },
{ exact inv_pos.trans lt_top_iff_ne_top.symm },
{ simp only [not_lt_zero, not_top_lt] },
{ cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le a) with ha ha;
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le b) with hb hb,
{ subst a, subst b, simp },
{ subst a, simp },
{ subst b, simp [zero_lt_iff_ne_zero, lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top] },
{ rw [← coe_inv (ne_of_gt ha), ← coe_inv (ne_of_gt hb), coe_lt_coe, coe_lt_coe],
simp only [nnreal.coe_lt_coe.symm] at *,
exact inv_lt_inv ha hb } }
end
lemma inv_lt_iff_inv_lt : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_lt_inv a b⁻¹
lemma lt_inv_iff_lt_inv : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_lt_inv a⁻¹ b
@[simp, priority 1100] -- higher than le_inv_iff_mul_le
lemma inv_le_inv : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
by simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, inv_lt_inv, inv_eq_inv, eq_comm]
lemma inv_le_iff_inv_le : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_le_inv a b⁻¹
lemma le_inv_iff_le_inv : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_le_inv a⁻¹ b
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_one : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a :=
inv_lt_iff_inv_lt.trans $ by rw [inv_one]
@[simp] lemma div_top : a / ∞ = 0 := by simp only [div_def, inv_top, mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma top_div_coe : ∞ / p = ∞ := by simp [div_def, top_mul]
lemma top_div_of_ne_top (h : a ≠ ⊤) : ∞ / a = ∞ :=
by { lift a to nnreal using h, exact top_div_coe }
lemma top_div_of_lt_top (h : a < ⊤) : ∞ / a = ∞ :=
top_div_of_ne_top h.ne
lemma top_div : ∞ / a = if a = ∞ then 0 else ∞ :=
by by_cases a = ∞; simp [top_div_of_ne_top, *]
@[simp] lemma zero_div : 0 / a = 0 := zero_mul a⁻¹
lemma div_eq_top : a / b = ⊤ ↔ (a ≠ 0 ∧ b = 0) ∨ (a = ⊤ ∧ b ≠ ⊤) :=
by simp [ennreal.div_def, ennreal.mul_eq_top]
lemma le_div_iff_mul_le (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ⊤ ∨ c ≠ ⊤) :
a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c :=
begin
cases b,
{ simp at ht,
split,
{ assume ha, simp at ha, simp [ha] },
{ contrapose,
assume ha,
simp at ha,
have : a * ⊤ = ⊤, by simp [ennreal.mul_eq_top, ha],
simp [this, ht] } },
by_cases hb : b ≠ 0,
{ have : (b : ennreal) ≠ 0, by simp [hb],
rw [← ennreal.mul_le_mul_left this coe_ne_top],
suffices : ↑b * a ≤ (↑b * ↑b⁻¹) * c ↔ a * ↑b ≤ c,
{ simpa [some_eq_coe, div_def, hb, mul_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_assoc] },
rw [← coe_mul, nnreal.mul_inv_cancel hb, coe_one, one_mul, mul_comm] },
{ simp at hb,
simp [hb] at h0,
have : c / 0 = ⊤, by simp [div_eq_top, h0],
simp [hb, this] }
end
lemma div_le_iff_le_mul (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ⊤) (hbt : b ≠ ⊤ ∨ c ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b :=
begin
suffices : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c / b⁻¹, by simpa [div_def],
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le _ _).symm,
simpa [inv_ne_zero] using hbt,
simpa [inv_ne_zero] using hb0
end
lemma div_le_of_le_mul (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b :=
begin
by_cases h0 : c = 0,
{ have : a = 0, by simpa [h0] using h, simp [*] },
by_cases hinf : c = ⊤, by simp [hinf],
exact (div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h0) (or.inl hinf)).2 h
end
protected lemma div_lt_iff (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ⊤ ∨ c ≠ ⊤) :
c / b < a ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div_iff_mul_le h0 ht
lemma mul_lt_of_lt_div (h : a < b / c) : a * c < b :=
by { contrapose! h, exact ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul h }
lemma inv_le_iff_le_mul : (b = ⊤ → a ≠ 0) → (a = ⊤ → b ≠ 0) → (a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul] {contextual := tt},
by_cases a = 0; simp [*, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm, nnreal.inv_le]
end
@[simp] lemma le_inv_iff_mul_le : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 :=
begin
cases b, { by_cases a = 0; simp [*, none_eq_top, mul_top] },
by_cases b = 0; simp [*, some_eq_coe, le_div_iff_mul_le],
suffices : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ a * b ≤ 1, { simpa [div_def, h] },
exact le_div_iff_mul_le (or.inl (mt coe_eq_coe.1 h)) (or.inl coe_ne_top)
end
lemma mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ⊤) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
begin
lift a to nnreal using ht,
norm_cast at h0,
norm_cast,
exact nnreal.mul_inv_cancel h0
end
lemma inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
lemma mul_le_iff_le_inv {a b r : ennreal} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr₁ : r ≠ ⊤) : (r * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ r⁻¹ * b) :=
by rw [← @ennreal.mul_le_mul_left _ a _ hr₀ hr₁, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hr₀ hr₁, one_mul]
lemma le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_lt : ∀{x y : ennreal}, (∀a<1, a * x ≤ y) → x ≤ y :=
forall_ennreal.2 $ and.intro
(assume r, forall_ennreal.2 $ and.intro
(assume q h, coe_le_coe.2 $ nnreal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_lt $ assume a ha,
begin rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul], exact h _ (coe_lt_coe.2 ha) end)
(assume h, le_top))
(assume r hr,
have ((1 / 2 : nnreal) : ennreal) * ⊤ ≤ r :=
hr _ (coe_lt_coe.2 ((@nnreal.coe_lt_coe (1/2) 1).1 one_half_lt_one)),
have ne : ((1 / 2 : nnreal) : ennreal) ≠ 0,
begin
rw [(≠), coe_eq_zero],
refine zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.1 _,
show 0 < (1 / 2 : ℝ),
linarith,
end,
by rwa [mul_top, if_neg ne] at this)
lemma div_add_div_same {a b c : ennreal} : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
eq.symm $ right_distrib a b (c⁻¹)
lemma div_self (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a / a = 1 :=
mul_inv_cancel h0 hI
lemma mul_div_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : (b / a) * a = b :=
by rw [div_def, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel h0 hI, mul_one]
lemma mul_div_cancel' (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel h0 hI]
lemma inv_two_add_inv_two : (2:ennreal)⁻¹ + 2⁻¹ = 1 :=
by rw [← two_mul, ← div_def, div_self two_ne_zero two_ne_top]
lemma add_halves (a : ennreal) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a :=
by rw [div_def, ← mul_add, inv_two_add_inv_two, mul_one]
@[simp] lemma div_zero_iff : a / b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = ⊤ :=
by simp [div_def, mul_eq_zero]
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ ⊤ :=
by simp [zero_lt_iff_ne_zero, not_or_distrib]
lemma half_pos {a : ennreal} (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / 2 :=
by simp [ne_of_gt h]
lemma one_half_lt_one : (2⁻¹:ennreal) < 1 := inv_lt_one.2 $ one_lt_two
lemma half_lt_self {a : ennreal} (hz : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ⊤) : a / 2 < a :=
begin
lift a to nnreal using ht,
have h : (2 : ennreal) = ((2 : nnreal) : ennreal), from rfl,
have h' : (2 : nnreal) ≠ 0, from _root_.two_ne_zero',
rw [h, ← coe_div h', coe_lt_coe], -- `norm_cast` fails to apply `coe_div`
norm_cast at hz,
exact nnreal.half_lt_self hz
end
lemma sub_half (h : a ≠ ∞) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 :=
begin
lift a to nnreal using h,
exact sub_eq_of_add_eq (mul_ne_top coe_ne_top $ by simp) (add_halves a)
end
lemma one_sub_inv_two : (1:ennreal) - 2⁻¹ = 2⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [div_def, one_mul] using sub_half one_ne_top
lemma exists_inv_nat_lt {a : ennreal} (h : a ≠ 0) :
∃n:ℕ, (n:ennreal)⁻¹ < a :=
@inv_inv a ▸ by simp only [inv_lt_inv, ennreal.exists_nat_gt (inv_ne_top.2 h)]
lemma exists_nat_mul_gt (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ⊤) :
∃ n : ℕ, b < n * a :=
begin
have : b / a ≠ ⊤, from mul_ne_top hb (inv_ne_top.2 ha),
refine (ennreal.exists_nat_gt this).imp (λ n hn, _),
rwa [← ennreal.div_lt_iff (or.inl ha) (or.inr hb)]
end
end inv
section real
lemma to_real_add (ha : a ≠ ⊤) (hb : b ≠ ⊤) : (a+b).to_real = a.to_real + b.to_real :=
begin
lift a to nnreal using ha,
lift b to nnreal using hb,
refl
end
lemma to_real_add_le : (a+b).to_real ≤ a.to_real + b.to_real :=
if ha : a = ⊤ then by simp only [ha, top_add, top_to_real, zero_add, to_real_nonneg]
else if hb : b = ⊤ then by simp only [hb, add_top, top_to_real, add_zero, to_real_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (to_real_add ha hb)
lemma of_real_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ennreal.of_real (p + q) = ennreal.of_real p + ennreal.of_real q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, ← coe_add,
coe_eq_coe, nnreal.of_real_add hp hq]
lemma of_real_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real (p + q) ≤ ennreal.of_real p + ennreal.of_real q :=
coe_le_coe.2 nnreal.of_real_add_le
@[simp] lemma to_real_le_to_real (ha : a ≠ ⊤) (hb : b ≠ ⊤) : a.to_real ≤ b.to_real ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
lift a to nnreal using ha,
lift b to nnreal using hb,
norm_cast
end
@[simp] lemma to_real_lt_to_real (ha : a ≠ ⊤) (hb : b ≠ ⊤) : a.to_real < b.to_real ↔ a < b :=
begin
lift a to nnreal using ha,
lift b to nnreal using hb,
norm_cast
end
lemma to_real_max (hr : a ≠ ⊤) (hp : b ≠ ⊤) :
ennreal.to_real (max a b) = max (ennreal.to_real a) (ennreal.to_real b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(λ h, by simp only [h, (ennreal.to_real_le_to_real hr hp).2 h, max_eq_right])
(λ h, by simp only [h, (ennreal.to_real_le_to_real hp hr).2 h, max_eq_left])
lemma to_nnreal_pos_iff : 0 < a.to_nnreal ↔ (0 < a ∧ a ≠ ∞) :=
begin
cases a,
{ simp [none_eq_top] },
{ simp [some_eq_coe] }
end
lemma to_real_pos_iff : 0 < a.to_real ↔ (0 < a ∧ a ≠ ∞):=
(nnreal.coe_pos).trans to_nnreal_pos_iff
lemma of_real_le_of_real {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ennreal.of_real p ≤ ennreal.of_real q :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real, nnreal.of_real_le_of_real h]
lemma of_real_le_of_le_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ennreal} (h : a ≤ ennreal.to_real b) :
ennreal.of_real a ≤ b :=
(of_real_le_of_real h).trans of_real_to_real_le
@[simp] lemma of_real_le_of_real_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ennreal.of_real p ≤ ennreal.of_real q ↔ p ≤ q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_le_coe, nnreal.of_real_le_of_real_iff h]
@[simp] lemma of_real_lt_of_real_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ennreal.of_real p < ennreal.of_real q ↔ p < q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_lt_coe, nnreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff h]
lemma of_real_lt_of_real_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ennreal.of_real p < ennreal.of_real q ↔ p < q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_lt_coe, nnreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff_of_nonneg hp]
@[simp] lemma of_real_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ennreal.of_real p ↔ 0 < p :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
lemma of_real_le_iff_le_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ennreal} (hb : b ≠ ⊤) :
ennreal.of_real a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ ennreal.to_real b :=
begin
lift b to nnreal using hb,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.of_real_le_iff_le_coe
end
lemma of_real_lt_iff_lt_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ennreal} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≠ ⊤) :
ennreal.of_real a < b ↔ a < ennreal.to_real b :=
begin
lift b to nnreal using hb,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.of_real_lt_iff_lt_coe ha
end
lemma le_of_real_iff_to_real_le {a : ennreal} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a ≤ ennreal.of_real b ↔ ennreal.to_real a ≤ b :=
begin
lift a to nnreal using ha,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.le_of_real_iff_coe_le hb
end
lemma to_real_le_of_le_of_real {a : ennreal} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ ennreal.of_real b) :
ennreal.to_real a ≤ b :=
have ha : a ≠ ⊤, from ne_top_of_le_ne_top of_real_ne_top h,
(le_of_real_iff_to_real_le ha hb).1 h
lemma lt_of_real_iff_to_real_lt {a : ennreal} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) :
a < ennreal.of_real b ↔ ennreal.to_real a < b :=
begin
lift a to nnreal using ha,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.lt_of_real_iff_coe_lt
end
lemma of_real_mul {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ennreal.of_real (p * q) = (ennreal.of_real p) * (ennreal.of_real q) :=
by { simp only [ennreal.of_real, coe_mul.symm, coe_eq_coe], exact nnreal.of_real_mul hp }
lemma to_real_of_real_mul (c : ℝ) (a : ennreal) (h : 0 ≤ c) :
ennreal.to_real ((ennreal.of_real c) * a) = c * ennreal.to_real a :=
begin
cases a,
{ simp only [none_eq_top, ennreal.to_real, top_to_nnreal, nnreal.coe_zero, mul_zero, mul_top],
by_cases h' : c ≤ 0,
{ rw [if_pos], { simp }, { convert of_real_zero, exact le_antisymm h' h } },
{ rw [if_neg], refl, rw [of_real_eq_zero], assumption } },
{ simp only [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.to_nnreal],
simp only [some_eq_coe, ennreal.of_real, coe_mul.symm, to_nnreal_coe, nnreal.coe_mul],
congr, apply nnreal.coe_of_real, exact h }
end
@[simp] lemma to_real_mul_top (a : ennreal) : ennreal.to_real (a * ⊤) = 0 :=
begin
by_cases h : a = 0,
{ rw [h, zero_mul, zero_to_real] },
{ rw [mul_top, if_neg h, top_to_real] }
end
@[simp] lemma to_real_top_mul (a : ennreal) : ennreal.to_real (⊤ * a) = 0 :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact to_real_mul_top _ }
lemma to_real_eq_to_real (ha : a < ⊤) (hb : b < ⊤) :
ennreal.to_real a = ennreal.to_real b ↔ a = b :=
begin
rw ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top at *,
split,
{ assume h, apply le_antisymm,
rw ← to_real_le_to_real ha hb, exact le_of_eq h,
rw ← to_real_le_to_real hb ha, exact le_of_eq h.symm },
{ assume h, rw h }
end
lemma to_real_mul_to_real :
(ennreal.to_real a) * (ennreal.to_real b) = ennreal.to_real (a * b) :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = ⊤,
{ rw ha, simp },
by_cases hb : b = ⊤,
{ rw hb, simp },
have ha : ennreal.of_real (ennreal.to_real a) = a := of_real_to_real ha,
have hb : ennreal.of_real (ennreal.to_real b) = b := of_real_to_real hb,
conv_rhs { rw [← ha, ← hb, ← of_real_mul to_real_nonneg] },
rw [to_real_of_real (mul_nonneg to_real_nonneg to_real_nonneg)]
end
end real
section infi
variables {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ennreal}
lemma infi_add : infi f + a = ⨅i, f i + a :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, add_le_add (infi_le _ _) $ le_refl _)
(ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 $ le_infi $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ infi_le _ _)
lemma supr_sub : (⨆i, f i) - a = (⨆i, f i - a) :=
le_antisymm
(ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ supr_le $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 $ le_supr _ i)
(supr_le $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_sub (le_supr _ _) (le_refl a))
lemma sub_infi : a - (⨅i, f i) = (⨆i, a - f i) :=
begin
refine (eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, _),
rw [ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add, add_comm, infi_add],
simp [ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm],
end
lemma Inf_add {s : set ennreal} : Inf s + a = ⨅b∈s, b + a :=
by simp [Inf_eq_infi, infi_add]
lemma add_infi {a : ennreal} : a + infi f = ⨅b, a + f b :=
by rw [add_comm, infi_add]; simp [add_comm]
lemma infi_add_infi (h : ∀i j, ∃k, f k + g k ≤ f i + g j) : infi f + infi g = (⨅a, f a + g a) :=
suffices (⨅a, f a + g a) ≤ infi f + infi g,
from le_antisymm (le_infi $ assume a, add_le_add (infi_le _ _) (infi_le _ _)) this,
calc (⨅a, f a + g a) ≤ (⨅ a a', f a + g a') :
le_infi $ assume a, le_infi $ assume a',
let ⟨k, h⟩ := h a a' in infi_le_of_le k h
... ≤ infi f + infi g :
by simp [add_infi, infi_add, -add_comm, -le_infi_iff]; exact le_refl _
lemma infi_sum {f : ι → α → ennreal} {s : finset α} [nonempty ι]
(h : ∀(t : finset α) (i j : ι), ∃k, ∀a∈t, f k a ≤ f i a ∧ f k a ≤ f j a) :
(⨅i, ∑ a in s, f i a) = ∑ a in s, ⨅i, f i a :=
finset.induction_on s (by simp) $ assume a s ha ih,
have ∀ (i j : ι), ∃ (k : ι), f k a + ∑ b in s, f k b ≤ f i a + ∑ b in s, f j b,
from assume i j,
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := h (insert a s) i j in
⟨k, add_le_add (hk a (finset.mem_insert_self _ _)).left $ finset.sum_le_sum $
assume a ha, (hk _ $ finset.mem_insert_of_mem ha).right⟩,
by simp [ha, ih.symm, infi_add_infi this]
lemma infi_mul {ι} [nonempty ι] {f : ι → ennreal} {x : ennreal} (h : x ≠ ⊤) :
infi f * x = ⨅i, f i * x :=
begin
by_cases h2 : x = 0, simp only [h2, mul_zero, infi_const],
refine le_antisymm
(le_infi $ λ i, mul_right_mono $ infi_le _ _)
((div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h2) $ or.inl h).mp $ le_infi $
λ i, (div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h2) $ or.inl h).mpr $ infi_le _ _)
end
lemma mul_infi {ι} [nonempty ι] {f : ι → ennreal} {x : ennreal} (h : x ≠ ⊤) :
x * infi f = ⨅i, x * f i :=
by { rw [mul_comm, infi_mul h], simp only [mul_comm], assumption }
/-! `supr_mul`, `mul_supr` and variants are in `topology.instances.ennreal`. -/
end infi
section supr
lemma supr_coe_nat : (⨆n:ℕ, (n : ennreal)) = ⊤ :=
(supr_eq_top _).2 $ assume b hb, ennreal.exists_nat_gt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 hb)
end supr
end ennreal
|
27650b066ac50640417bc84d22378d05439faf3b | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/run/1171.lean | e986e94e086fa68ec96e18f090ba49ce3b82e025 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 145 | lean | inductive foo : nat → Type
| f1 : foo 1
| fn : Pi (n : nat), foo n
def rig : Pi (n : nat), foo n → bool
| 1 foo.f1 := tt
| _ _ := ff
|
10036afbd696e3462a62216fa630826289b8319d | 969dbdfed67fda40a6f5a2b4f8c4a3c7dc01e0fb | /src/data/finset/basic.lean | f6468692c26ae7cbd5afc6a969742717ba2a6323 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | SAAluthwela/mathlib | 62044349d72dd63983a8500214736aa7779634d3 | 83a4b8b990907291421de54a78988c024dc8a552 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,433,873,417 | 1,615,998,031,000 | 1,615,998,031,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 111,943 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.multiset.finset_ops
import tactic.monotonicity
import tactic.apply
import tactic.nth_rewrite
/-!
# Finite sets
Terms of type `finset α` are one way of talking about finite subsets of `α` in mathlib.
Below, `finset α` is defined as a structure with 2 fields:
1. `val` is a `multiset α` of elements;
2. `nodup` is a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
Finsets in Lean are constructive in that they have an underlying `list` that enumerates their
elements. In particular, any function that uses the data of the underlying list cannot depend on its
ordering. This is handled on the `multiset` level by multiset API, so in most cases one needn't
worry about it explicitly.
Finsets give a basic foundation for defining finite sums and products over types:
1. `∑ i in (s : finset α), f i`;
2. `∏ i in (s : finset α), f i`.
Lean refers to these operations as `big_operator`s.
More information can be found in `algebra.big_operators.basic`.
Finsets are directly used to define fintypes in Lean.
A `fintype α` instance for a type `α` consists of
a universal `finset α` containing every term of `α`, called `univ`. See `data.fintype.basic`.
There is also `univ'`, the noncomputable partner to `univ`,
which is defined to be `α` as a finset if `α` is finite,
and the empty finset otherwise. See `data.fintype.basic`.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `finset`: Defines a type for the finite subsets of `α`.
Constructing a `finset` requires two pieces of data: `val`, a `multiset α` of elements,
and `nodup`, a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
* `finset.has_mem`: Defines membership `a ∈ (s : finset α)`.
* `finset.has_coe`: Provides a coercion `s : finset α` to `s : set α`.
* `finset.induction_on`: Induction on finsets. To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty finset, and to show that if it holds for some `finset α`,
then it holds for the finset obtained by inserting a new element.
* `finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
* `finset.card`: `card s : ℕ` returns the cardinalilty of `s : finset α`.
The API for `card`'s interaction with operations on finsets is extensive.
TODO: The noncomputable sister `fincard` is about to be added into mathlib.
### Finset constructions
* `singleton`: Denoted by `{a}`; the finset consisting of one element.
* `finset.empty`: Denoted by `∅`. The finset associated to any type consisting of no elements.
* `finset.range`: For any `n : ℕ`, `range n` is equal to `{0, 1, ... , n - 1} ⊆ ℕ`.
This convention is consistent with other languages and normalizes `card (range n) = n`.
Beware, `n` is not in `range n`.
* `finset.diag`: Given `s`, `diag s` is the set of pairs `(a, a)` with `a ∈ s`. See also
`finset.off_diag`: Given a finite set `s`, the off-diagonal,
`s.off_diag` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` with `a ≠ b` for `a, b ∈ s`.
* `finset.attach`: Given `s : finset α`, `attach s` forms a finset of elements of the subtype
`{a // a ∈ s}`; in other words, it attaches elements to a proof of membership in the set.
### Finsets from functions
* `finset.image`: Given a function `f : α → β`, `s.image f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `finset.map`: Given an embedding `f : α ↪ β`, `s.map f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `finset.filter`: Given a predicate `p : α → Prop`, `s.filter p` is
the finset consisting of those elements in `s` satisfying the predicate `p`.
### The lattice structure on subsets of finsets
There is a natural lattice structure on the subsets of a set.
In Lean, we use lattice notation to talk about things involving unions and intersections. See
`order.lattice`. For the lattice structure on finsets, `⊥` is called `bot` with `⊥ = ∅` and `⊤` is
called `top` with `⊤ = univ`.
* `finset.subset`: Lots of API about lattices, otherwise behaves exactly as one would expect.
* `finset.union`: Defines `s ∪ t` (or `s ⊔ t`) as the union of `s` and `t`.
See `finset.bUnion` for finite unions.
* `finset.inter`: Defines `s ∩ t` (or `s ⊓ t`) as the intersection of `s` and `t`.
TODO: `finset.bInter` for finite intersections.
* `finset.disj_union`: Given a hypothesis `h` which states that finsets `s` and `t` are disjoint,
`s.disj_union t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disj_union s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`; this does
not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
### Operations on two or more finsets
* `finset.insert` and `finset.cons`: For any `a : α`, `insert s a` returns `s ∪ {a}`. `cons s a h`
returns the same except that it requires a hypothesis stating that `a` is not already in `s`.
This does not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `finset.union`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `finset.inter`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `finset.erase`: For any `a : α`, `erase s a` returns `s` with the element `a` removed.
* `finset.sdiff`: Defines the set difference `s \ t` for finsets `s` and `t`.
* `finset.prod`: Given finsets of `α` and `β`, defines finsets of `α × β`.
For arbitrary dependent products, see `data.finset.pi`.
* `finset.sigma`: Given finsets of `α` and `β`, defines finsets of the dependent sum type `Σ α, β`
* `finset.bUnion`: Finite unions of finsets; given an indexing function `f : α → finset β` and a
`s : finset α`, `s.bUnion f` is the union of all finsets of the form `f a` for `a ∈ s`.
* `finset.bInter`: TODO: Implemement finite intersections.
### Maps constructed using finsets
* `finset.piecewise`: Given two functions `f`, `g`, `s.piecewise f g` is a function which is equal
to `f` on `s` and `g` on the complement.
### Predicates on finsets
* `disjoint`: defined via the lattice structure on finsets; two sets are disjoint if their
intersection is empty.
* `finset.nonempty`: A finset is nonempty if it has elements.
This is equivalent to saying `s ≠ ∅`. TODO: Decide on the simp normal form.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `data.equiv` files describe a general type of equivalence, so look in there for any lemmas.
There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that `s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
open multiset subtype nat function
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- `finset α` is the type of finite sets of elements of `α`. It is implemented
as a multiset (a list up to permutation) which has no duplicate elements. -/
structure finset (α : Type*) :=
(val : multiset α)
(nodup : nodup val)
namespace finset
theorem eq_of_veq : ∀ {s t : finset α}, s.1 = t.1 → s = t
| ⟨s, _⟩ ⟨t, _⟩ rfl := rfl
@[simp] theorem val_inj {s t : finset α} : s.1 = t.1 ↔ s = t :=
⟨eq_of_veq, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_eq_self [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) : erase_dup s.1 = s.1 :=
erase_dup_eq_self.2 s.2
instance has_decidable_eq [decidable_eq α] : decidable_eq (finset α)
| s₁ s₂ := decidable_of_iff _ val_inj
/-! ### membership -/
instance : has_mem α (finset α) := ⟨λ a s, a ∈ s.1⟩
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : finset α} : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s.1 := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_mk {a : α} {s nd} : a ∈ @finset.mk α s nd ↔ a ∈ s := iff.rfl
instance decidable_mem [h : decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : finset α) : decidable (a ∈ s) :=
multiset.decidable_mem _ _
/-! ### set coercion -/
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
instance : has_coe_t (finset α) (set α) := ⟨λ s, {x | x ∈ s}⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma mem_coe {a : α} {s : finset α} : a ∈ (s : set α) ↔ a ∈ s := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma set_of_mem {α} {s : finset α} : {a | a ∈ s} = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mem {s : finset α} (x : (s : set α)) : ↑x ∈ s := x.2
@[simp] lemma mk_coe {s : finset α} (x : (s : set α)) {h} :
(⟨x, h⟩ : (s : set α)) = x :=
subtype.coe_eta _ _
instance decidable_mem' [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : finset α) :
decidable (a ∈ (s : set α)) := s.decidable_mem _
/-! ### extensionality -/
theorem ext_iff {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂ :=
val_inj.symm.trans $ nodup_ext s₁.2 s₂.2
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : (∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂) → s₁ = s₂ :=
ext_iff.2
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_inj {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : (s₁ : set α) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
set.ext_iff.trans ext_iff.symm
lemma coe_injective {α} : injective (coe : finset α → set α) :=
λ s t, coe_inj.1
/-! ### subset -/
instance : has_subset (finset α) := ⟨λ s₁ s₂, ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂⟩
theorem subset_def {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ ↔ s₁.1 ⊆ s₂.1 := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem subset.refl (s : finset α) : s ⊆ s := subset.refl _
theorem subset_of_eq {s t : finset α} (h : s = t) : s ⊆ t := h ▸ subset.refl _
theorem subset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₂ ⊆ s₃ → s₁ ⊆ s₃ := subset.trans
theorem superset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α} : s₁ ⊇ s₂ → s₂ ⊇ s₃ → s₁ ⊇ s₃ :=
λ h' h, subset.trans h h'
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
local attribute [trans] subset.trans superset.trans
theorem mem_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ := mem_of_subset
theorem subset.antisymm {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (H₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (H₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext $ λ a, ⟨@H₁ a, @H₂ a⟩
theorem subset_iff {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s₁ → x ∈ s₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} :
(s₁ : set α) ⊆ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem val_le_iff {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁.1 ≤ s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := le_iff_subset s₁.2
instance : has_ssubset (finset α) := ⟨λa b, a ⊆ b ∧ ¬ b ⊆ a⟩
instance : partial_order (finset α) :=
{ le := (⊆),
lt := (⊂),
le_refl := subset.refl,
le_trans := @subset.trans _,
le_antisymm := @subset.antisymm _ }
theorem subset.antisymm_iff {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ s₂ ⊆ s₁ :=
le_antisymm_iff
@[simp] theorem le_iff_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ ≤ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem lt_iff_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ < s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : (s₁ : set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
show (s₁ : set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ ¬s₂ ⊆ s₁,
by simp only [set.ssubset_def, finset.coe_subset]
@[simp] theorem val_lt_iff {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁.1 < s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr val_le_iff $ not_congr val_le_iff
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ⊂ s₂ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h
/-! ### Nonempty -/
/-- The property `s.nonempty` expresses the fact that the finset `s` is not empty. It should be used
in theorem assumptions instead of `∃ x, x ∈ s` or `s ≠ ∅` as it gives access to a nice API thanks
to the dot notation. -/
protected def nonempty (s : finset α) : Prop := ∃ x:α, x ∈ s
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nonempty {s : finset α} : (s:set α).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty := iff.rfl
lemma nonempty.bex {s : finset α} (h : s.nonempty) : ∃ x:α, x ∈ s := h
lemma nonempty.mono {s t : finset α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.nonempty) : t.nonempty :=
set.nonempty.mono hst hs
lemma nonempty.forall_const {s : finset α} (h : s.nonempty) {p : Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s, p) ↔ p :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h in ⟨λ h, h x hx, λ h x hx, h⟩
/-! ### empty -/
/-- The empty finset -/
protected def empty : finset α := ⟨0, nodup_zero⟩
instance : has_emptyc (finset α) := ⟨finset.empty⟩
instance inhabited_finset : inhabited (finset α) := ⟨∅⟩
@[simp] theorem empty_val : (∅ : finset α).1 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ (∅ : finset α) := id
@[simp] theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : finset α).nonempty :=
λ ⟨x, hx⟩, not_mem_empty x hx
@[simp] theorem mk_zero : (⟨0, nodup_zero⟩ : finset α) = ∅ := rfl
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ :=
λ e, not_mem_empty a $ e ▸ h
theorem nonempty.ne_empty {s : finset α} (h : s.nonempty) : s ≠ ∅ :=
exists.elim h $ λ a, ne_empty_of_mem
@[simp] theorem empty_subset (s : finset α) : ∅ ⊆ s := zero_subset _
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : finset α} (H : ∀x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
eq_of_veq (eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem H)
lemma eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : finset α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
⟨by rintro rfl x; exact id, λ h, eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem h⟩
@[simp] theorem val_eq_zero {s : finset α} : s.1 = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := @val_inj _ s ∅
theorem subset_empty {s : finset α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := subset_zero.trans val_eq_zero
theorem nonempty_of_ne_empty {s : finset α} (h : s ≠ ∅) : s.nonempty :=
exists_mem_of_ne_zero (mt val_eq_zero.1 h)
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty {s : finset α} : s.nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
⟨nonempty.ne_empty, nonempty_of_ne_empty⟩
@[simp] theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : finset α} : ¬s.nonempty ↔ s = ∅ :=
by { rw nonempty_iff_ne_empty, exact not_not, }
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : finset α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.nonempty :=
classical.by_cases or.inl (λ h, or.inr (nonempty_of_ne_empty h))
@[simp] lemma coe_empty : ((∅ : finset α) : set α) = ∅ := rfl
/-- A `finset` for an empty type is empty. -/
lemma eq_empty_of_not_nonempty (h : ¬ nonempty α) (s : finset α) : s = ∅ :=
finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem $ λ x, false.elim $ not_nonempty_iff_imp_false.1 h x
/-! ### singleton -/
/--
`{a} : finset a` is the set `{a}` containing `a` and nothing else.
This differs from `insert a ∅` in that it does not require a `decidable_eq` instance for `α`.
-/
instance : has_singleton α (finset α) := ⟨λ a, ⟨{a}, nodup_singleton a⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem singleton_val (a : α) : ({a} : finset α).1 = a ::ₘ 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : finset α) ↔ b = a := mem_singleton
theorem not_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∉ ({b} : finset α) ↔ a ≠ b := not_congr mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : finset α) := or.inl rfl
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : ({a} : finset α) = {b} ↔ a = b :=
⟨λ h, mem_singleton.1 (h ▸ mem_singleton_self _), congr_arg _⟩
@[simp] theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : finset α).nonempty := ⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩
@[simp] theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : finset α) ≠ ∅ := (singleton_nonempty a).ne_empty
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_singleton (a : α) : (({a} : finset α) : set α) = {a} :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem {s : finset α} {a : α} :
s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
begin
split; intro t,
rw t,
refine ⟨finset.mem_singleton_self _, λ _, finset.mem_singleton.1⟩,
ext, rw finset.mem_singleton,
refine ⟨t.right _, λ r, r.symm ▸ t.left⟩
end
lemma eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem {s : finset α} {a : α} :
s = {a} ↔ s.nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
begin
split,
{ intros h, subst h, simp, },
{ rintros ⟨hne, h_uniq⟩, rw eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, refine ⟨_, h_uniq⟩,
rw ← h_uniq hne.some hne.some_spec, apply hne.some_spec, },
end
lemma singleton_iff_unique_mem (s : finset α) : (∃ a, s = {a}) ↔ ∃! a, a ∈ s :=
by simp only [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, exists_unique]
lemma singleton_subset_set_iff {s : set α} {a : α} :
↑({a} : finset α) ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
by rw [coe_singleton, set.singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma singleton_subset_iff {s : finset α} {a : α} :
{a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
singleton_subset_set_iff
/-! ### cons -/
/-- `cons a s h` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. It is the same as
`insert a s` when it is defined, but unlike `insert a s` it does not require `decidable_eq α`,
and the union is guaranteed to be disjoint. -/
def cons {α} (a : α) (s : finset α) (h : a ∉ s) : finset α :=
⟨a ::ₘ s.1, multiset.nodup_cons.2 ⟨h, s.2⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_cons {α a s h b} : b ∈ @cons α a s h ↔ b = a ∨ b ∈ s :=
by rcases s with ⟨⟨s⟩⟩; apply list.mem_cons_iff
@[simp] theorem cons_val {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_cons {a : α} {s : multiset α} (h : (a ::ₘ s).nodup) :
(⟨a ::ₘ s, h⟩ : finset α) = cons a ⟨s, (multiset.nodup_cons.1 h).2⟩ (multiset.nodup_cons.1 h).1 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem nonempty_cons {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_cons.2 (or.inl rfl)⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_mk_coe : ∀ {l : list α} {hl}, (⟨↑l, hl⟩ : finset α).nonempty ↔ l ≠ []
| [] hl := by simp
| (a::l) hl := by simp [← multiset.cons_coe]
/-! ### disjoint union -/
/-- `disj_union s t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disj_union s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`.
It is the same as `s ∪ t`, but it does not require decidable equality on the type. The hypothesis
ensures that the sets are disjoint. -/
def disj_union {α} (s t : finset α) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, a ∉ t) : finset α :=
⟨s.1 + t.1, multiset.nodup_add.2 ⟨s.2, t.2, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_disj_union {α s t h a} :
a ∈ @disj_union α s t h ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
by rcases s with ⟨⟨s⟩⟩; rcases t with ⟨⟨t⟩⟩; apply list.mem_append
/-! ### insert -/
section decidable_eq
variables [decidable_eq α]
/-- `insert a s` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. -/
instance : has_insert α (finset α) := ⟨λ a s, ⟨_, nodup_ndinsert a s.2⟩⟩
theorem insert_def (a : α) (s : finset α) : insert a s = ⟨_, nodup_ndinsert a s.2⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_val (a : α) (s : finset α) : (insert a s).1 = ndinsert a s.1 := rfl
theorem insert_val' (a : α) (s : finset α) : (insert a s).1 = erase_dup (a ::ₘ s.1) :=
by rw [erase_dup_cons, erase_dup_eq_self]; refl
theorem insert_val_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 :=
by rw [insert_val, ndinsert_of_not_mem h]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert {a b : α} {s : finset α} : a ∈ insert b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s := mem_ndinsert
theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (s : finset α) : a ∈ insert a s := mem_ndinsert_self a s.1
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ insert b s :=
mem_ndinsert_of_mem h
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : finset α} (h : b ∈ insert a s) : b ≠ a → b ∈ s :=
(mem_insert.1 h).resolve_left
@[simp] theorem cons_eq_insert {α} [decidable_eq α] (a s h) : @cons α a s h = insert a s :=
ext $ λ a, by simp
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_insert (a : α) (s : finset α) :
↑(insert a s) = (insert a s : set α) :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_coe, mem_insert, set.mem_insert_iff]
lemma mem_insert_coe {s : finset α} {x y : α} : x ∈ insert y s ↔ x ∈ insert y (s : set α) :=
by simp
instance : is_lawful_singleton α (finset α) := ⟨λ a, by { ext, simp }⟩
@[simp] theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
eq_of_veq $ ndinsert_of_mem h
@[simp] theorem insert_singleton_self_eq (a : α) : ({a, a} : finset α) = {a} :=
insert_eq_of_mem $ mem_singleton_self _
theorem insert.comm (a b : α) (s : finset α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_insert, or.left_comm]
theorem insert_singleton_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : finset α) = {b, a} :=
begin
ext,
simp [or.comm]
end
@[simp] theorem insert_idem (a : α) (s : finset α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_insert, or.assoc.symm, or_self]
@[simp] theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : finset α) : (insert a s).nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_insert_self a s⟩
@[simp] theorem insert_ne_empty (a : α) (s : finset α) : insert a s ≠ ∅ :=
(insert_nonempty a s).ne_empty
section
universe u
/-!
The universe annotation is required for the following instance, possibly this is a bug in Lean. See
leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/strange.20error.20(universe.20issue.3F)
-/
instance {α : Type u} [decidable_eq α] (i : α) (s : finset α) :
nonempty.{u + 1} ((insert i s : finset α) : set α) :=
(finset.coe_nonempty.mpr (s.insert_nonempty i)).to_subtype
end
lemma ne_insert_of_not_mem (s t : finset α) {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
s ≠ insert a t :=
by { contrapose! h, simp [h] }
theorem insert_subset {a : α} {s t : finset α} : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t :=
by simp only [subset_iff, mem_insert, forall_eq, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem subset_insert (a : α) (s : finset α) : s ⊆ insert a s :=
λ b, mem_insert_of_mem
theorem insert_subset_insert (a : α) {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t :=
insert_subset.2 ⟨mem_insert_self _ _, subset.trans h (subset_insert _ _)⟩
lemma ssubset_iff {s t : finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ (∃a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t) :=
by exact_mod_cast @set.ssubset_iff_insert α s t
lemma ssubset_insert {s : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff.mpr ⟨a, h, subset.refl _⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected theorem induction {α : Type*} {p : finset α → Prop} [decidable_eq α]
(h₁ : p ∅) (h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : ∀ s, p s
| ⟨s, nd⟩ := multiset.induction_on s (λ _, h₁) (λ a s IH nd, begin
cases nodup_cons.1 nd with m nd',
rw [← (eq_of_veq _ : insert a (finset.mk s _) = ⟨a ::ₘ s, nd⟩)],
{ exact h₂ (by exact m) (IH nd') },
{ rw [insert_val, ndinsert_of_not_mem m] }
end) nd
/--
To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `finset α`,
then it holds for the `finset` obtained by inserting a new element.
-/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected theorem induction_on {α : Type*} {p : finset α → Prop} [decidable_eq α]
(s : finset α) (h₁ : p ∅) (h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p s :=
finset.induction h₁ h₂ s
/--
To prove a proposition about `S : finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `finset α ⊆ S`,
then it holds for the `finset` obtained by inserting a new element of `S`.
-/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem induction_on' {α : Type*} {p : finset α → Prop} [decidable_eq α]
(S : finset α) (h₁ : p ∅) (h₂ : ∀ {a s}, a ∈ S → s ⊆ S → a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p S :=
@finset.induction_on α (λ T, T ⊆ S → p T) _ S (λ _, h₁) (λ a s has hqs hs,
let ⟨hS, sS⟩ := finset.insert_subset.1 hs in h₂ hS sS has (hqs sS)) (finset.subset.refl S)
/-- Inserting an element to a finite set is equivalent to the option type. -/
def subtype_insert_equiv_option {t : finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
{i // i ∈ insert x t} ≃ option {i // i ∈ t} :=
begin
refine
{ to_fun := λ y, if h : ↑y = x then none else some ⟨y, (mem_insert.mp y.2).resolve_left h⟩,
inv_fun := λ y, y.elim ⟨x, mem_insert_self _ _⟩ $ λ z, ⟨z, mem_insert_of_mem z.2⟩,
.. },
{ intro y, by_cases h : ↑y = x,
simp only [subtype.ext_iff, h, option.elim, dif_pos, subtype.coe_mk],
simp only [h, option.elim, dif_neg, not_false_iff, subtype.coe_eta, subtype.coe_mk] },
{ rintro (_|y), simp only [option.elim, dif_pos, subtype.coe_mk],
have : ↑y ≠ x, { rintro ⟨⟩, exact h y.2 },
simp only [this, option.elim, subtype.eta, dif_neg, not_false_iff, subtype.coe_eta,
subtype.coe_mk] },
end
/-! ### union -/
/-- `s ∪ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∪ t` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : has_union (finset α) := ⟨λ s₁ s₂, ⟨_, nodup_ndunion s₁.1 s₂.2⟩⟩
theorem union_val_nd (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).1 = ndunion s₁.1 s₂.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem union_val (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).1 = s₁.1 ∪ s₂.1 :=
ndunion_eq_union s₁.2
@[simp] theorem mem_union {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ := mem_ndunion
@[simp] theorem disj_union_eq_union {α} [decidable_eq α] (s t h) : @disj_union α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext $ λ a, by simp
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {s₁ : finset α} (s₂ : finset α) (h : a ∈ s₁) : a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂ :=
mem_union.2 $ or.inl h
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} {s₂ : finset α} (s₁ : finset α) (h : a ∈ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂ :=
mem_union.2 $ or.inr h
theorem forall_mem_union {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ ab ∈ (s₁ ∪ s₂), p ab) ↔ (∀ a ∈ s₁, p a) ∧ (∀ b ∈ s₂, p b) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ a, h a ∘ mem_union_left _, λ b, h b ∘ mem_union_right _⟩,
λ h ab hab, (mem_union.mp hab).elim (h.1 _) (h.2 _)⟩
theorem not_mem_union {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : a ∉ s₁ ∪ s₂ ↔ a ∉ s₁ ∧ a ∉ s₂ :=
by rw [mem_union, not_or_distrib]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_union (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∪ s₂) = (s₁ ∪ s₂ : set α) := set.ext $ λ x, mem_union
theorem union_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₃) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ⊆ s₃ :=
val_le_iff.1 (ndunion_le.2 ⟨h₁, val_le_iff.2 h₂⟩)
theorem subset_union_left (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := λ x, mem_union_left _
theorem subset_union_right (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₂ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := λ x, mem_union_right _
lemma union_subset_union {s1 t1 s2 t2 : finset α} (h1 : s1 ⊆ t1) (h2 : s2 ⊆ t2) :
s1 ∪ s2 ⊆ t1 ∪ t2 :=
by { intros x hx, rw finset.mem_union at hx ⊢, tauto }
theorem union_comm (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ = s₂ ∪ s₁ :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_union, or_comm]
instance : is_commutative (finset α) (∪) := ⟨union_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem union_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_union, or_assoc]
instance : is_associative (finset α) (∪) := ⟨union_assoc⟩
@[simp] theorem union_idempotent (s : finset α) : s ∪ s = s :=
ext $ λ _, mem_union.trans $ or_self _
instance : is_idempotent (finset α) (∪) := ⟨union_idempotent⟩
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_union, or.left_comm]
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ s₃ = (s₁ ∪ s₃) ∪ s₂ :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_union, or_assoc, or_comm (x ∈ s₂)]
theorem union_self (s : finset α) : s ∪ s = s := union_idempotent s
@[simp] theorem union_empty (s : finset α) : s ∪ ∅ = s :=
ext $ λ x, mem_union.trans $ or_false _
@[simp] theorem empty_union (s : finset α) : ∅ ∪ s = s :=
ext $ λ x, mem_union.trans $ false_or _
theorem insert_eq (a : α) (s : finset α) : insert a s = {a} ∪ s := rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_union (a : α) (s t : finset α) : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
by simp only [insert_eq, union_assoc]
@[simp] theorem union_insert (a : α) (s t : finset α) : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
by simp only [insert_eq, union_left_comm]
theorem insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : finset α) :
insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t :=
by simp only [insert_union, union_insert, insert_idem]
@[simp] lemma union_eq_left_iff_subset {s t : finset α} :
s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
have : t ⊆ s ∪ t := subset_union_right _ _,
rwa h at this },
{ assume h,
exact subset.antisymm (union_subset (subset.refl _) h) (subset_union_left _ _) }
end
@[simp] lemma left_eq_union_iff_subset {s t : finset α} :
s = s ∪ t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
by rw [← union_eq_left_iff_subset, eq_comm]
@[simp] lemma union_eq_right_iff_subset {s t : finset α} :
t ∪ s = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
by rw [union_comm, union_eq_left_iff_subset]
@[simp] lemma right_eq_union_iff_subset {s t : finset α} :
s = t ∪ s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
by rw [← union_eq_right_iff_subset, eq_comm]
/--
To prove a relation on pairs of `finset X`, it suffices to show that it is
* symmetric,
* it holds when one of the `finset`s is empty,
* it holds for pairs of singletons,
* if it holds for `[a, c]` and for `[b, c]`, then it holds for `[a ∪ b, c]`.
-/
lemma induction_on_union (P : finset α → finset α → Prop)
(symm : ∀ {a b}, P a b → P b a)
(empty_right : ∀ {a}, P a ∅)
(singletons : ∀ {a b}, P {a} {b})
(union_of : ∀ {a b c}, P a c → P b c → P (a ∪ b) c) :
∀ a b, P a b :=
begin
intros a b,
refine finset.induction_on b empty_right (λ x s xs hi, symm _),
rw finset.insert_eq,
apply union_of _ (symm hi),
refine finset.induction_on a empty_right (λ a t ta hi, symm _),
rw finset.insert_eq,
exact union_of singletons (symm hi),
end
/-! ### inter -/
/-- `s ∩ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∩ t` iff `a ∈ s` and `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : has_inter (finset α) := ⟨λ s₁ s₂, ⟨_, nodup_ndinter s₂.1 s₁.2⟩⟩
theorem inter_val_nd (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = ndinter s₁.1 s₂.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_val (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = s₁.1 ∩ s₂.1 :=
ndinter_eq_inter s₁.2
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ := mem_ndinter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) :
a ∈ s₁ := (mem_inter.1 h).1
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) :
a ∈ s₂ := (mem_inter.1 h).2
theorem mem_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
and_imp.1 mem_inter.2
theorem inter_subset_left (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₁ := λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_left
theorem inter_subset_right (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₂ := λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊆ s₃ → s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∩ s₃ :=
by simp only [subset_iff, mem_inter] {contextual:=tt}; intros; split; trivial
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_inter (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∩ s₂) = (s₁ ∩ s₂ : set α) := set.ext $ λ _, mem_inter
@[simp] theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
by rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, set.union_inter_cancel_left]
@[simp] theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
by rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, set.union_inter_cancel_right]
theorem inter_comm (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₂ ∩ s₁ :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_inter, and_comm]
@[simp] theorem inter_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_inter, and.left_comm]
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ∩ s₃ = (s₁ ∩ s₃) ∩ s₂ :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_inter, and.right_comm]
@[simp] theorem inter_self (s : finset α) : s ∩ s = s :=
ext $ λ _, mem_inter.trans $ and_self _
@[simp] theorem inter_empty (s : finset α) : s ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext $ λ _, mem_inter.trans $ and_false _
@[simp] theorem empty_inter (s : finset α) : ∅ ∩ s = ∅ :=
ext $ λ _, mem_inter.trans $ false_and _
@[simp] lemma inter_union_self (s t : finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ s) = s :=
by rw [inter_comm, union_inter_cancel_right]
@[simp] theorem insert_inter_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
ext $ λ x, have x = a ∨ x ∈ s₂ ↔ x ∈ s₂, from or_iff_right_of_imp $ by rintro rfl; exact h,
by simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_distrib_left, this]
@[simp] theorem inter_insert_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_mem h, inter_comm]
@[simp] theorem insert_inter_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
ext $ λ x, have ¬ (x = a ∧ x ∈ s₂), by rintro ⟨rfl, H⟩; exact h H,
by simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_distrib_right, this, false_or]
@[simp] theorem inter_insert_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_not_mem h, inter_comm]
@[simp] theorem singleton_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (H : a ∈ s) : {a} ∩ s = {a} :=
show insert a ∅ ∩ s = insert a ∅, by rw [insert_inter_of_mem H, empty_inter]
@[simp] theorem singleton_inter_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (H : a ∉ s) : {a} ∩ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem $ by simp only [mem_inter, mem_singleton]; rintro x ⟨rfl, h⟩; exact H h
@[simp] theorem inter_singleton_of_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ∩ {a} = {a} :=
by rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp] theorem inter_singleton_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ∩ {a} = ∅ :=
by rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
@[mono]
lemma inter_subset_inter {x y s t : finset α} (h : x ⊆ y) (h' : s ⊆ t) : x ∩ s ⊆ y ∩ t :=
begin
intros a a_in,
rw finset.mem_inter at a_in ⊢,
exact ⟨h a_in.1, h' a_in.2⟩
end
lemma inter_subset_inter_right {x y s : finset α} (h : x ⊆ y) : x ∩ s ⊆ y ∩ s :=
finset.inter_subset_inter h (finset.subset.refl _)
lemma inter_subset_inter_left {x y s : finset α} (h : x ⊆ y) : s ∩ x ⊆ s ∩ y :=
finset.inter_subset_inter (finset.subset.refl _) h
/-! ### lattice laws -/
instance : lattice (finset α) :=
{ sup := (∪),
sup_le := assume a b c, union_subset,
le_sup_left := subset_union_left,
le_sup_right := subset_union_right,
inf := (∩),
le_inf := assume a b c, subset_inter,
inf_le_left := inter_subset_left,
inf_le_right := inter_subset_right,
..finset.partial_order }
@[simp] theorem sup_eq_union (s t : finset α) : s ⊔ t = s ∪ t := rfl
@[simp] theorem inf_eq_inter (s t : finset α) : s ⊓ t = s ∩ t := rfl
instance : semilattice_inf_bot (finset α) :=
{ bot := ∅, bot_le := empty_subset, ..finset.lattice }
instance {α : Type*} [decidable_eq α] : semilattice_sup_bot (finset α) :=
{ ..finset.semilattice_inf_bot, ..finset.lattice }
instance : distrib_lattice (finset α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := assume a b c, show (a ∪ b) ∩ (a ∪ c) ⊆ a ∪ b ∩ c,
by simp only [subset_iff, mem_inter, mem_union, and_imp, or_imp_distrib] {contextual:=tt};
simp only [true_or, imp_true_iff, true_and, or_true],
..finset.lattice }
theorem inter_distrib_left (s t u : finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) := inf_sup_left
theorem inter_distrib_right (s t u : finset α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∪ (t ∩ u) := inf_sup_right
theorem union_distrib_left (s t u : finset α) : s ∪ (t ∩ u) = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) := sup_inf_left
theorem union_distrib_right (s t u : finset α) : (s ∩ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) := sup_inf_right
lemma union_eq_empty_iff (A B : finset α) : A ∪ B = ∅ ↔ A = ∅ ∧ B = ∅ := sup_eq_bot_iff
/-! ### erase -/
/-- `erase s a` is the set `s - {a}`, that is, the elements of `s` which are
not equal to `a`. -/
def erase (s : finset α) (a : α) : finset α := ⟨_, nodup_erase_of_nodup a s.2⟩
@[simp] theorem erase_val (s : finset α) (a : α) : (erase s a).1 = s.1.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_erase {a b : α} {s : finset α} : a ∈ erase s b ↔ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ s :=
mem_erase_iff_of_nodup s.2
theorem not_mem_erase (a : α) (s : finset α) : a ∉ erase s a := mem_erase_of_nodup s.2
@[simp] theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ := rfl
theorem ne_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {s : finset α} : b ∈ erase s a → b ≠ a :=
by simp only [mem_erase]; exact and.left
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {s : finset α} : b ∈ erase s a → b ∈ s := mem_of_mem_erase
theorem mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem {a b : α} {s : finset α} : a ≠ b → a ∈ s → a ∈ erase s b :=
by simp only [mem_erase]; exact and.intro
/-- An element of `s` that is not an element of `erase s a` must be
`a`. -/
lemma eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase {a b : α} {s : finset α} (hs : b ∈ s)
(hsa : b ∉ s.erase a) : b = a :=
begin
rw [mem_erase, not_and] at hsa,
exact not_imp_not.mp hsa hs
end
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s :=
ext $ assume x, by simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_distrib_left, not_and_self, false_or];
apply and_iff_right_of_imp; rintro H rfl; exact h H
theorem insert_erase {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext $ assume x, by simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_distrib_left, dec_em, true_and];
apply or_iff_right_of_imp; rintro rfl; exact h
theorem erase_subset_erase (a : α) {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : erase s a ⊆ erase t a :=
val_le_iff.1 $ erase_le_erase _ $ val_le_iff.2 h
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (s : finset α) : erase s a ⊆ s := erase_subset _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_erase (a : α) (s : finset α) : ↑(erase s a) = (s \ {a} : set α) :=
set.ext $ λ _, mem_erase.trans $ by rw [and_comm, set.mem_diff, set.mem_singleton_iff]; refl
lemma erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) : ssubset_insert $ not_mem_erase _ _
... = _ : insert_erase h
theorem erase_eq_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase s a = s :=
eq_of_veq $ erase_of_not_mem h
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t :=
by simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp];
exact forall_congr (λ x, forall_swap)
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 $ subset.refl _
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 $ subset.refl _
/-! ### sdiff -/
/-- `s \ t` is the set consisting of the elements of `s` that are not in `t`. -/
instance : has_sdiff (finset α) := ⟨λs₁ s₂, ⟨s₁.1 - s₂.1, nodup_of_le (sub_le_self _ _) s₁.2⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_sdiff {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} :
a ∈ s₁ \ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∉ s₂ := mem_sub_of_nodup s₁.2
lemma not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right {a : α} {s t : finset α} (h : a ∈ t) : a ∉ s \ t :=
by simp only [mem_sdiff, h, not_true, not_false_iff, and_false]
theorem sdiff_union_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : (s₂ \ s₁) ∪ s₁ = s₂ :=
ext $ λ a, by simpa only [mem_sdiff, mem_union, or_comm,
or_and_distrib_left, dec_em, and_true] using or_iff_right_of_imp (@h a)
theorem union_sdiff_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ \ s₁) = s₂ :=
(union_comm _ _).trans (sdiff_union_of_subset h)
theorem inter_sdiff (s t u : finset α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = s ∩ t \ u :=
by { ext x, simp [and_assoc] }
@[simp] theorem inter_sdiff_self (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ \ s₁) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem $
by simp only [mem_inter, mem_sdiff]; rintro x ⟨h, _, hn⟩; exact hn h
@[simp] theorem sdiff_inter_self (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₂ \ s₁) ∩ s₁ = ∅ :=
(inter_comm _ _).trans (inter_sdiff_self _ _)
@[simp] theorem sdiff_self (s₁ : finset α) : s₁ \ s₁ = ∅ :=
by ext; simp
theorem sdiff_inter_distrib_right (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : s₁ \ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = (s₁ \ s₂) ∪ (s₁ \ s₃) :=
by ext; simp only [and_or_distrib_left, mem_union, not_and_distrib, mem_sdiff, mem_inter]
@[simp] theorem sdiff_inter_self_left (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ \ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = s₁ \ s₂ :=
by simp only [sdiff_inter_distrib_right, sdiff_self, empty_union]
@[simp] theorem sdiff_inter_self_right (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ \ (s₂ ∩ s₁) = s₁ \ s₂ :=
by simp only [sdiff_inter_distrib_right, sdiff_self, union_empty]
@[simp] theorem sdiff_empty {s₁ : finset α} : s₁ \ ∅ = s₁ :=
ext (by simp)
@[mono]
theorem sdiff_subset_sdiff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : finset α} (h₁ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₁) :
t₁ \ s₁ ⊆ t₂ \ s₂ :=
by simpa only [subset_iff, mem_sdiff, and_imp] using λ a m₁ m₂, and.intro (h₁ m₁) (mt (@h₂ _) m₂)
theorem sdiff_subset_self {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ \ s₂ ⊆ s₁ :=
suffices s₁ \ s₂ ⊆ s₁ \ ∅, by simpa [sdiff_empty] using this,
sdiff_subset_sdiff (subset.refl _) (empty_subset _)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sdiff (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : ↑(s₁ \ s₂) = (s₁ \ s₂ : set α) :=
set.ext $ λ _, mem_sdiff
@[simp] theorem union_sdiff_self_eq_union {s t : finset α} : s ∪ (t \ s) = s ∪ t :=
ext $ λ a, by simp only [mem_union, mem_sdiff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
imp_and_distrib, and_iff_left id]
@[simp] theorem sdiff_union_self_eq_union {s t : finset α} : (s \ t) ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
by rw [union_comm, union_sdiff_self_eq_union, union_comm]
lemma union_sdiff_symm {s t : finset α} : s ∪ (t \ s) = t ∪ (s \ t) :=
by rw [union_sdiff_self_eq_union, union_sdiff_self_eq_union, union_comm]
lemma sdiff_union_inter (s t : finset α) : (s \ t) ∪ (s ∩ t) = s :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_union, mem_sdiff, mem_inter], tauto }
@[simp] lemma sdiff_idem (s t : finset α) : s \ t \ t = s \ t :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_sdiff], tauto }
lemma sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset {s t : finset α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
by { rw [subset_iff, ext_iff], simp }
@[simp] lemma empty_sdiff (s : finset α) : ∅ \ s = ∅ :=
by { rw sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, exact empty_subset _ }
lemma insert_sdiff_of_not_mem (s : finset α) {t : finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
(insert x s) \ t = insert x (s \ t) :=
begin
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_sdiff, coe_sdiff, coe_insert],
exact set.insert_diff_of_not_mem s h
end
lemma insert_sdiff_of_mem (s : finset α) {t : finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ t) :
(insert x s) \ t = s \ t :=
begin
rw [← coe_inj, coe_sdiff, coe_sdiff, coe_insert],
exact set.insert_diff_of_mem s h
end
@[simp] lemma insert_sdiff_insert (s t : finset α) (x : α) :
(insert x s) \ (insert x t) = s \ insert x t :=
insert_sdiff_of_mem _ (mem_insert_self _ _)
lemma sdiff_insert_of_not_mem {s : finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) (t : finset α) :
s \ (insert x t) = s \ t :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm (sdiff_subset_sdiff (subset.refl _) (subset_insert _ _)) (λ y hy, _),
simp only [mem_sdiff, mem_insert, not_or_distrib] at hy ⊢,
exact ⟨hy.1, λ hxy, h $ hxy ▸ hy.1, hy.2⟩
end
@[simp] lemma sdiff_subset (s t : finset α) : s \ t ⊆ s :=
by simp [subset_iff, mem_sdiff] {contextual := tt}
lemma union_sdiff_distrib (s₁ s₂ t : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) \ t = s₁ \ t ∪ s₂ \ t :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_sdiff, mem_union], tauto }
lemma sdiff_union_distrib (s t₁ t₂ : finset α) : s \ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = (s \ t₁) ∩ (s \ t₂) :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_union, mem_sdiff, mem_inter], tauto }
lemma union_sdiff_self (s t : finset α) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
by rw [union_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_self, union_empty]
lemma sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : finset α) : s \ singleton a = erase s a :=
by { ext, rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton], tauto }
lemma sdiff_sdiff_self_left (s t : finset α) : s \ (s \ t) = s ∩ t :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_sdiff, mem_inter], tauto }
lemma inter_eq_inter_of_sdiff_eq_sdiff {s t₁ t₂ : finset α} : s \ t₁ = s \ t₂ → s ∩ t₁ = s ∩ t₂ :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_sdiff, mem_inter], intros b c, replace b := b c, split; tauto }
end decidable_eq
/-! ### attach -/
/-- `attach s` takes the elements of `s` and forms a new set of elements of the
subtype `{x // x ∈ s}`. -/
def attach (s : finset α) : finset {x // x ∈ s} := ⟨attach s.1, nodup_attach.2 s.2⟩
theorem sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem [has_sizeof α] {x : α} {s : finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
sizeof x < sizeof s := by
{ cases s, dsimp [sizeof, has_sizeof.sizeof, finset.sizeof],
apply lt_add_left, exact multiset.sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem hx }
@[simp] theorem attach_val (s : finset α) : s.attach.1 = s.1.attach := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (s : finset α) : ∀ x, x ∈ s.attach := mem_attach _
@[simp] theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : finset α) = ∅ := rfl
/-! ### piecewise -/
section piecewise
/-- `s.piecewise f g` is the function equal to `f` on the finset `s`, and to `g` on its
complement. -/
def piecewise {α : Type*} {δ : α → Sort*} (s : finset α) (f g : Πi, δ i) [∀j, decidable (j ∈ s)] :
Πi, δ i :=
λi, if i ∈ s then f i else g i
variables {δ : α → Sort*} (s : finset α) (f g : Πi, δ i)
@[simp] lemma piecewise_insert_self [decidable_eq α] {j : α} [∀i, decidable (i ∈ insert j s)] :
(insert j s).piecewise f g j = f j :=
by simp [piecewise]
@[simp] lemma piecewise_empty [∀i : α, decidable (i ∈ (∅ : finset α))] : piecewise ∅ f g = g :=
by { ext i, simp [piecewise] }
variable [∀j, decidable (j ∈ s)]
@[norm_cast] lemma piecewise_coe [∀j, decidable (j ∈ (s : set α))] :
(s : set α).piecewise f g = s.piecewise f g :=
by { ext, congr }
@[simp, priority 980]
lemma piecewise_eq_of_mem {i : α} (hi : i ∈ s) : s.piecewise f g i = f i :=
by simp [piecewise, hi]
@[simp, priority 980]
lemma piecewise_eq_of_not_mem {i : α} (hi : i ∉ s) : s.piecewise f g i = g i :=
by simp [piecewise, hi]
lemma piecewise_congr {f f' g g' : Π i, δ i} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = f' i) (hg : ∀ i ∉ s, g i = g' i) :
s.piecewise f g = s.piecewise f' g' :=
funext $ λ i, if_ctx_congr iff.rfl (hf i) (hg i)
@[simp, priority 990]
lemma piecewise_insert_of_ne [decidable_eq α] {i j : α} [∀i, decidable (i ∈ insert j s)]
(h : i ≠ j) : (insert j s).piecewise f g i = s.piecewise f g i :=
by simp [piecewise, h]
lemma piecewise_insert [decidable_eq α] (j : α) [∀i, decidable (i ∈ insert j s)] :
(insert j s).piecewise f g = update (s.piecewise f g) j (f j) :=
begin
classical,
rw [← piecewise_coe, ← piecewise_coe, ← set.piecewise_insert, ← coe_insert j s],
congr
end
lemma piecewise_cases {i} (p : δ i → Prop) (hf : p (f i)) (hg : p (g i)) : p (s.piecewise f g i) :=
by by_cases hi : i ∈ s; simpa [hi]
lemma piecewise_mem_set_pi {δ : α → Type*} {t : set α} {t' : Π i, set (δ i)}
{f g} (hf : f ∈ set.pi t t') (hg : g ∈ set.pi t t') : s.piecewise f g ∈ set.pi t t' :=
by { classical, rw ← piecewise_coe, exact set.piecewise_mem_pi ↑s hf hg }
lemma piecewise_singleton [decidable_eq α] (i : α) :
piecewise {i} f g = update g i (f i) :=
by rw [← insert_emptyc_eq, piecewise_insert, piecewise_empty]
lemma piecewise_piecewise_of_subset_left {s t : finset α} [Π i, decidable (i ∈ s)]
[Π i, decidable (i ∈ t)] (h : s ⊆ t) (f₁ f₂ g : Π a, δ a) :
s.piecewise (t.piecewise f₁ f₂) g = s.piecewise f₁ g :=
s.piecewise_congr (λ i hi, piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ (h hi)) (λ _ _, rfl)
@[simp] lemma piecewise_idem_left (f₁ f₂ g : Π a, δ a) :
s.piecewise (s.piecewise f₁ f₂) g = s.piecewise f₁ g :=
piecewise_piecewise_of_subset_left (subset.refl _) _ _ _
lemma piecewise_piecewise_of_subset_right {s t : finset α} [Π i, decidable (i ∈ s)]
[Π i, decidable (i ∈ t)] (h : t ⊆ s) (f g₁ g₂ : Π a, δ a) :
s.piecewise f (t.piecewise g₁ g₂) = s.piecewise f g₂ :=
s.piecewise_congr (λ _ _, rfl) (λ i hi, t.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ (mt (@h _) hi))
@[simp] lemma piecewise_idem_right (f g₁ g₂ : Π a, δ a) :
s.piecewise f (s.piecewise g₁ g₂) = s.piecewise f g₂ :=
piecewise_piecewise_of_subset_right (subset.refl _) f g₁ g₂
lemma update_eq_piecewise {β : Type*} [decidable_eq α] (f : α → β) (i : α) (v : β) :
update f i v = piecewise (singleton i) (λj, v) f :=
(piecewise_singleton _ _ _).symm
lemma update_piecewise [decidable_eq α] (i : α) (v : δ i) :
update (s.piecewise f g) i v = s.piecewise (update f i v) (update g i v) :=
begin
ext j,
rcases em (j = i) with (rfl|hj); by_cases hs : j ∈ s; simp *
end
lemma update_piecewise_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {i : α} (hi : i ∈ s) (v : δ i) :
update (s.piecewise f g) i v = s.piecewise (update f i v) g :=
begin
rw update_piecewise,
refine s.piecewise_congr (λ _ _, rfl) (λ j hj, update_noteq _ _ _),
exact λ h, hj (h.symm ▸ hi)
end
lemma update_piecewise_of_not_mem [decidable_eq α] {i : α} (hi : i ∉ s) (v : δ i) :
update (s.piecewise f g) i v = s.piecewise f (update g i v) :=
begin
rw update_piecewise,
refine s.piecewise_congr (λ j hj, update_noteq _ _ _) (λ _ _, rfl),
exact λ h, hi (h ▸ hj)
end
lemma piecewise_le_of_le_of_le {δ : α → Type*} [Π i, preorder (δ i)] {f g h : Π i, δ i}
(Hf : f ≤ h) (Hg : g ≤ h) : s.piecewise f g ≤ h :=
λ x, piecewise_cases s f g (≤ h x) (Hf x) (Hg x)
lemma le_piecewise_of_le_of_le {δ : α → Type*} [Π i, preorder (δ i)] {f g h : Π i, δ i}
(Hf : h ≤ f) (Hg : h ≤ g) : h ≤ s.piecewise f g :=
λ x, piecewise_cases s f g (λ y, h x ≤ y) (Hf x) (Hg x)
lemma piecewise_le_piecewise' {δ : α → Type*} [Π i, preorder (δ i)] {f g f' g' : Π i, δ i}
(Hf : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ f' x) (Hg : ∀ x ∉ s, g x ≤ g' x) : s.piecewise f g ≤ s.piecewise f' g' :=
λ x, by { by_cases hx : x ∈ s; simp [hx, *] }
lemma piecewise_le_piecewise {δ : α → Type*} [Π i, preorder (δ i)] {f g f' g' : Π i, δ i}
(Hf : f ≤ f') (Hg : g ≤ g') : s.piecewise f g ≤ s.piecewise f' g' :=
s.piecewise_le_piecewise' (λ x _, Hf x) (λ x _, Hg x)
lemma piecewise_mem_Icc_of_mem_of_mem {δ : α → Type*} [Π i, preorder (δ i)] {f f₁ g g₁ : Π i, δ i}
(hf : f ∈ set.Icc f₁ g₁) (hg : g ∈ set.Icc f₁ g₁) :
s.piecewise f g ∈ set.Icc f₁ g₁ :=
⟨le_piecewise_of_le_of_le _ hf.1 hg.1, piecewise_le_of_le_of_le _ hf.2 hg.2⟩
lemma piecewise_mem_Icc {δ : α → Type*} [Π i, preorder (δ i)] {f g : Π i, δ i} (h : f ≤ g) :
s.piecewise f g ∈ set.Icc f g :=
piecewise_mem_Icc_of_mem_of_mem _ (set.left_mem_Icc.2 h) (set.right_mem_Icc.2 h)
lemma piecewise_mem_Icc' {δ : α → Type*} [Π i, preorder (δ i)] {f g : Π i, δ i} (h : g ≤ f) :
s.piecewise f g ∈ set.Icc g f :=
piecewise_mem_Icc_of_mem_of_mem _ (set.right_mem_Icc.2 h) (set.left_mem_Icc.2 h)
end piecewise
section decidable_pi_exists
variables {s : finset α}
instance decidable_dforall_finset {p : Πa∈s, Prop} [hp : ∀a (h : a ∈ s), decidable (p a h)] :
decidable (∀a (h : a ∈ s), p a h) :=
multiset.decidable_dforall_multiset
/-- decidable equality for functions whose domain is bounded by finsets -/
instance decidable_eq_pi_finset {β : α → Type*} [h : ∀a, decidable_eq (β a)] :
decidable_eq (Πa∈s, β a) :=
multiset.decidable_eq_pi_multiset
instance decidable_dexists_finset {p : Πa∈s, Prop} [hp : ∀a (h : a ∈ s), decidable (p a h)] :
decidable (∃a (h : a ∈ s), p a h) :=
multiset.decidable_dexists_multiset
end decidable_pi_exists
/-! ### filter -/
section filter
variables (p q : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
/-- `filter p s` is the set of elements of `s` that satisfy `p`. -/
def filter (s : finset α) : finset α :=
⟨_, nodup_filter p s.2⟩
@[simp] theorem filter_val (s : finset α) : (filter p s).1 = s.1.filter p := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (s : finset α) : s.filter p ⊆ s := filter_subset _ _
variable {p}
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {s : finset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s.filter p ↔ a ∈ s ∧ p a := mem_filter
theorem filter_ssubset {s : finset α} : s.filter p ⊂ s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ¬ p x :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨x, hs, hp⟩ := set.exists_of_ssubset h in ⟨x, hs, mt (λ hp, mem_filter.2 ⟨hs, hp⟩) hp⟩,
λ ⟨x, hs, hp⟩, ⟨s.filter_subset _, λ h, hp (mem_filter.1 (h hs)).2⟩⟩
variable (p)
theorem filter_filter (s : finset α) : (s.filter p).filter q = s.filter (λa, p a ∧ q a) :=
ext $ assume a, by simp only [mem_filter, and_comm, and.left_comm]
lemma filter_true {s : finset α} [h : decidable_pred (λ _, true)] :
@finset.filter α (λ _, true) h s = s :=
by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem filter_false {h} (s : finset α) : @filter α (λa, false) h s = ∅ :=
ext $ assume a, by simp only [mem_filter, and_false]; refl
variables {p q}
/-- If all elements of a `finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, `s.filter p` is `s`. -/
@[simp] lemma filter_true_of_mem {s : finset α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) : s.filter p = s :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ h, (mem_filter.1 h).1, λ hx, mem_filter.2 ⟨hx, h x hx⟩⟩
/-- If all elements of a `finset` fail to satisfy the predicate `p`, `s.filter p` is `∅`. -/
lemma filter_false_of_mem {s : finset α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ p x) : s.filter p = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (by simpa)
lemma filter_congr {s : finset α} (H : ∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x) : filter p s = filter q s :=
eq_of_veq $ filter_congr H
variables (p q)
lemma filter_empty : filter p ∅ = ∅ := subset_empty.1 $ filter_subset _ _
lemma filter_subset_filter {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s.filter p ⊆ t.filter p :=
assume a ha, mem_filter.2 ⟨h (mem_filter.1 ha).1, (mem_filter.1 ha).2⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_filter (s : finset α) : ↑(s.filter p) = ({x ∈ ↑s | p x} : set α) :=
set.ext $ λ _, mem_filter
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p (singleton a) = if p a then singleton a else ∅ :=
by { classical, ext x, simp, split_ifs with h; by_cases h' : x = a; simp [h, h'] }
variable [decidable_eq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_distrib_right]
theorem filter_union_right (s : finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter (λx, p x ∨ q x) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_distrib_left.symm]
lemma filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : finset α} [Π i, decidable (i ∈ t)] :
s.filter (λ i, i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext $ λ i, by rw [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter (s t : finset α) : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) :=
by { ext, simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and.right_comm] }
theorem inter_filter (s t : finset α) : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) :=
by rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else filter p s :=
by { ext x, simp, split_ifs with h; by_cases h' : x = a; simp [h, h'] }
theorem filter_or [decidable_pred (λ a, p a ∨ q a)] (s : finset α) :
s.filter (λ a, p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_distrib_left]
theorem filter_and [decidable_pred (λ a, p a ∧ q a)] (s : finset α) :
s.filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and.left_comm, and_self]
theorem filter_not [decidable_pred (λ a, ¬ p a)] (s : finset α) :
s.filter (λ a, ¬ p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext $ by simpa only [mem_filter, mem_sdiff, and_comm, not_and] using λ a, and_congr_right $
λ h : a ∈ s, (imp_iff_right h).symm.trans imp_not_comm
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : finset α) :
s₁ \ s₂ = filter (∉ s₂) s₁ := ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem sdiff_eq_self (s₁ s₂ : finset α) :
s₁ \ s₂ = s₁ ↔ s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ ∅ :=
by { simp [subset.antisymm_iff,sdiff_subset_self],
split; intro h,
{ transitivity' ((s₁ \ s₂) ∩ s₂), mono, simp },
{ calc s₁ \ s₂
⊇ s₁ \ (s₁ ∩ s₂) : by simp [(⊇)]
... ⊇ s₁ \ ∅ : by mono using [(⊇)]
... ⊇ s₁ : by simp [(⊇)] } }
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [decidable_pred (λ a, ¬ p a)]
(s : finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter (λa, ¬ p a) = s :=
by simp only [filter_not, union_sdiff_of_subset (filter_subset p s)]
theorem filter_inter_filter_neg_eq (s : finset α) : s.filter p ∩ s.filter (λa, ¬ p a) = ∅ :=
by simp only [filter_not, inter_sdiff_self]
lemma subset_union_elim {s : finset α} {t₁ t₂ : set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃s₁ s₂ : finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ :=
begin
classical,
refine ⟨s.filter (∈ t₁), s.filter (∉ t₁), _, _ , _⟩,
{ simp [filter_union_right, em] },
{ intro x, simp },
{ intro x, simp, intros hx hx₂, refine ⟨or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩ }
end
/- We can simplify an application of filter where the decidability is inferred in "the wrong way" -/
@[simp] lemma filter_congr_decidable {α} (s : finset α) (p : α → Prop) (h : decidable_pred p)
[decidable_pred p] : @filter α p h s = s.filter p :=
by congr
section classical
open_locale classical
/-- The following instance allows us to write `{ x ∈ s | p x }` for `finset.filter s p`.
Since the former notation requires us to define this for all propositions `p`, and `finset.filter`
only works for decidable propositions, the notation `{ x ∈ s | p x }` is only compatible with
classical logic because it uses `classical.prop_decidable`.
We don't want to redo all lemmas of `finset.filter` for `has_sep.sep`, so we make sure that `simp`
unfolds the notation `{ x ∈ s | p x }` to `finset.filter s p`. If `p` happens to be decidable, the
simp-lemma `filter_congr_decidable` will make sure that `finset.filter` uses the right instance
for decidability.
-/
noncomputable instance {α : Type*} : has_sep α (finset α) := ⟨λ p x, x.filter p⟩
@[simp] lemma sep_def {α : Type*} (s : finset α) (p : α → Prop) : {x ∈ s | p x} = s.filter p := rfl
end classical
/--
After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter(eq b)`.
lemma filter_eq [decidable_eq β] (s : finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
begin
split_ifs,
{ ext,
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton],
exact ⟨λ h, h.2.symm, by { rintro ⟨h⟩, exact ⟨h, rfl⟩, }⟩ },
{ ext,
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty],
rintros m ⟨e⟩, exact h m, }
end
/--
After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
lemma filter_eq' [decidable_eq β] (s : finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (λ a, a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
trans (filter_congr (λ _ _, ⟨eq.symm, eq.symm⟩)) (filter_eq s b)
lemma filter_ne [decidable_eq β] (s : finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (λ a, b ≠ a) = s.erase b :=
by { ext, simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, ne.def], cc, }
lemma filter_ne' [decidable_eq β] (s : finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (λ a, a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
trans (filter_congr (λ _ _, ⟨ne.symm, ne.symm⟩)) (filter_ne s b)
end filter
/-! ### range -/
section range
variables {n m l : ℕ}
/-- `range n` is the set of natural numbers less than `n`. -/
def range (n : ℕ) : finset ℕ := ⟨_, nodup_range n⟩
@[simp] theorem range_coe (n : ℕ) : (range n).1 = multiset.range n := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_range : m ∈ range n ↔ m < n := mem_range
@[simp] theorem range_zero : range 0 = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem range_one : range 1 = {0} := rfl
theorem range_succ : range (succ n) = insert n (range n) :=
eq_of_veq $ (range_succ n).trans $ (ndinsert_of_not_mem not_mem_range_self).symm
theorem range_add_one : range (n + 1) = insert n (range n) :=
range_succ
@[simp] theorem not_mem_range_self : n ∉ range n := not_mem_range_self
@[simp] theorem self_mem_range_succ (n : ℕ) : n ∈ range (n + 1) := multiset.self_mem_range_succ n
@[simp] theorem range_subset {n m} : range n ⊆ range m ↔ n ≤ m := range_subset
theorem range_mono : monotone range := λ _ _, range_subset.2
lemma mem_range_succ_iff {a b : ℕ} : a ∈ finset.range b.succ ↔ a ≤ b :=
finset.mem_range.trans nat.lt_succ_iff
lemma mem_range_le {n x : ℕ} (hx : x ∈ range n) : x ≤ n :=
(mem_range.1 hx).le
lemma mem_range_sub_ne_zero {n x : ℕ} (hx : x ∈ range n) : n - x ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt $ nat.sub_pos_of_lt $ mem_range.1 hx
end range
/- useful rules for calculations with quantifiers -/
theorem exists_mem_empty_iff (p : α → Prop) : (∃ x, x ∈ (∅ : finset α) ∧ p x) ↔ false :=
by simp only [not_mem_empty, false_and, exists_false]
theorem exists_mem_insert [d : decidable_eq α]
(a : α) (s : finset α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∃ x, x ∈ insert a s ∧ p x) ↔ p a ∨ (∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ p x) :=
by simp only [mem_insert, or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
theorem forall_mem_empty_iff (p : α → Prop) : (∀ x, x ∈ (∅ : finset α) → p x) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ _, false.elim
theorem forall_mem_insert [d : decidable_eq α]
(a : α) (s : finset α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → p x) ↔ p a ∧ (∀ x, x ∈ s → p x) :=
by simp only [mem_insert, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
end finset
/-- Equivalence between the set of natural numbers which are `≥ k` and `ℕ`, given by `n → n - k`. -/
def not_mem_range_equiv (k : ℕ) : {n // n ∉ range k} ≃ ℕ :=
{ to_fun := λ i, i.1 - k,
inv_fun := λ j, ⟨j + k, by simp⟩,
left_inv :=
begin
assume j,
rw subtype.ext_iff_val,
apply nat.sub_add_cancel,
simpa using j.2
end,
right_inv := λ j, nat.add_sub_cancel _ _ }
@[simp] lemma coe_not_mem_range_equiv (k : ℕ) :
(not_mem_range_equiv k : {n // n ∉ range k} → ℕ) = (λ i, i - k) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_not_mem_range_equiv_symm (k : ℕ) :
((not_mem_range_equiv k).symm : ℕ → {n // n ∉ range k}) = λ j, ⟨j + k, by simp⟩ := rfl
namespace option
/-- Construct an empty or singleton finset from an `option` -/
def to_finset (o : option α) : finset α :=
match o with
| none := ∅
| some a := {a}
end
@[simp] theorem to_finset_none : none.to_finset = (∅ : finset α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem to_finset_some {a : α} : (some a).to_finset = {a} := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_to_finset {a : α} {o : option α} : a ∈ o.to_finset ↔ a ∈ o :=
by cases o; simp only [to_finset, finset.mem_singleton, option.mem_def, eq_comm]; refl
end option
/-! ### erase_dup on list and multiset -/
namespace multiset
variable [decidable_eq α]
/-- `to_finset s` removes duplicates from the multiset `s` to produce a finset. -/
def to_finset (s : multiset α) : finset α := ⟨_, nodup_erase_dup s⟩
@[simp] theorem to_finset_val (s : multiset α) : s.to_finset.1 = s.erase_dup := rfl
theorem to_finset_eq {s : multiset α} (n : nodup s) : finset.mk s n = s.to_finset :=
finset.val_inj.1 (erase_dup_eq_self.2 n).symm
@[simp] theorem mem_to_finset {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ s.to_finset ↔ a ∈ s :=
mem_erase_dup
@[simp] lemma to_finset_zero :
to_finset (0 : multiset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_finset_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
to_finset (a ::ₘ s) = insert a (to_finset s) :=
finset.eq_of_veq erase_dup_cons
@[simp] lemma to_finset_add (s t : multiset α) :
to_finset (s + t) = to_finset s ∪ to_finset t :=
finset.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma to_finset_nsmul (s : multiset α) :
∀(n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0), (n •ℕ s).to_finset = s.to_finset
| 0 h := by contradiction
| (n+1) h :=
begin
by_cases n = 0,
{ rw [h, zero_add, one_nsmul] },
{ rw [add_nsmul, to_finset_add, one_nsmul, to_finset_nsmul n h, finset.union_idempotent] }
end
@[simp] lemma to_finset_inter (s t : multiset α) :
to_finset (s ∩ t) = to_finset s ∩ to_finset t :=
finset.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma to_finset_union (s t : multiset α) :
(s ∪ t).to_finset = s.to_finset ∪ t.to_finset :=
by ext; simp
theorem to_finset_eq_empty {m : multiset α} : m.to_finset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
finset.val_inj.symm.trans multiset.erase_dup_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma to_finset_subset (m1 m2 : multiset α) :
m1.to_finset ⊆ m2.to_finset ↔ m1 ⊆ m2 :=
by simp only [finset.subset_iff, multiset.subset_iff, multiset.mem_to_finset]
end multiset
namespace finset
@[simp] lemma val_to_finset [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) : s.val.to_finset = s :=
by { ext, rw [multiset.mem_to_finset, ←mem_def] }
end finset
namespace list
variable [decidable_eq α]
/-- `to_finset l` removes duplicates from the list `l` to produce a finset. -/
def to_finset (l : list α) : finset α := multiset.to_finset l
@[simp] theorem to_finset_val (l : list α) : l.to_finset.1 = (l.erase_dup : multiset α) := rfl
theorem to_finset_eq {l : list α} (n : nodup l) : @finset.mk α l n = l.to_finset :=
multiset.to_finset_eq n
@[simp] theorem mem_to_finset {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.to_finset ↔ a ∈ l :=
mem_erase_dup
@[simp] theorem to_finset_nil : to_finset (@nil α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem to_finset_cons {a : α} {l : list α} : to_finset (a :: l) = insert a (to_finset l) :=
finset.eq_of_veq $ by by_cases h : a ∈ l; simp [finset.insert_val', multiset.erase_dup_cons, h]
lemma to_finset_surj_on : set.surj_on to_finset {l : list α | l.nodup} set.univ :=
begin
rintro s -,
cases s with t hl, induction t using quot.ind with l,
refine ⟨l, hl, (to_finset_eq hl).symm⟩
end
theorem to_finset_surjective : surjective (to_finset : list α → finset α) :=
by { intro s, rcases to_finset_surj_on (set.mem_univ s) with ⟨l, -, hls⟩, exact ⟨l, hls⟩ }
end list
namespace finset
/-! ### map -/
section map
open function
/-- When `f` is an embedding of `α` in `β` and `s` is a finset in `α`, then `s.map f` is the image
finset in `β`. The embedding condition guarantees that there are no duplicates in the image. -/
def map (f : α ↪ β) (s : finset α) : finset β :=
⟨s.1.map f, nodup_map f.2 s.2⟩
@[simp] theorem map_val (f : α ↪ β) (s : finset α) : (map f s).1 = s.1.map f := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_empty (f : α ↪ β) : (∅ : finset α).map f = ∅ := rfl
variables {f : α ↪ β} {s : finset α}
@[simp] theorem mem_map {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b :=
mem_map.trans $ by simp only [exists_prop]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_map_equiv {f : α ≃ β} {b : β} :
b ∈ s.map f.to_embedding ↔ f.symm b ∈ s :=
by { rw mem_map, exact ⟨by { rintro ⟨a, H, rfl⟩, simpa }, λ h, ⟨_, h, by simp⟩⟩ }
theorem mem_map' (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : finset α} : f a ∈ s.map f ↔ a ∈ s :=
mem_map_of_injective f.2
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : finset α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ s.map f :=
(mem_map' _).2
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : finset α) : (↑(s.map f) : set β) = f '' ↑s :=
set.ext $ λ x, mem_map.trans set.mem_image_iff_bex.symm
theorem coe_map_subset_range (f : α ↪ β) (s : finset α) : (↑(s.map f) : set β) ⊆ set.range f :=
calc ↑(s.map f) = f '' ↑s : coe_map f s
... ⊆ set.range f : set.image_subset_range f ↑s
theorem map_to_finset [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] {s : multiset α} :
s.to_finset.map f = (s.map f).to_finset :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_map, multiset.mem_map, exists_prop, multiset.mem_to_finset]
@[simp] theorem map_refl : s.map (embedding.refl _) = s :=
ext $ λ _, by simpa only [mem_map, exists_prop] using exists_eq_right
theorem map_map {g : β ↪ γ} : (s.map f).map g = s.map (f.trans g) :=
eq_of_veq $ by simp only [map_val, multiset.map_map]; refl
theorem map_subset_map {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁.map f ⊆ s₂.map f ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨λ h x xs, (mem_map' _).1 $ h $ (mem_map' f).2 xs,
λ h, by simp [subset_def, map_subset_map h]⟩
theorem map_inj {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁.map f = s₂.map f ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
by simp only [subset.antisymm_iff, map_subset_map]
/-- Associate to an embedding `f` from `α` to `β` the embedding that maps a finset to its image
under `f`. -/
def map_embedding (f : α ↪ β) : finset α ↪ finset β := ⟨map f, λ s₁ s₂, map_inj.1⟩
@[simp] theorem map_embedding_apply : map_embedding f s = map f s := rfl
theorem map_filter {p : β → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
(s.map f).filter p = (s.filter (p ∘ f)).map f :=
eq_of_veq (map_filter _ _ _)
theorem map_union [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β]
{f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∪ s₂.map f :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_map, mem_union, exists_prop, or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib]
theorem map_inter [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β]
{f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∩ s₂.map f :=
ext $ λ b, by simp only [mem_map, mem_inter, exists_prop]; exact
⟨by rintro ⟨a, ⟨m₁, m₂⟩, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨a, m₁, rfl⟩, ⟨a, m₂, rfl⟩⟩,
by rintro ⟨⟨a, m₁, e⟩, ⟨a', m₂, rfl⟩⟩; cases f.2 e; exact ⟨_, ⟨m₁, m₂⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem map_singleton (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) : map f {a} = {f a} :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_map, mem_singleton, exists_prop, exists_eq_left]; exact eq_comm
@[simp] theorem map_insert [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β]
(f : α ↪ β) (a : α) (s : finset α) :
(insert a s).map f = insert (f a) (s.map f) :=
by simp only [insert_eq, map_union, map_singleton]
@[simp] theorem map_eq_empty : s.map f = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨λ h, eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem $
λ a m, ne_empty_of_mem (mem_map_of_mem _ m) h, λ e, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma attach_map_val {s : finset α} : s.attach.map (embedding.subtype _) = s :=
eq_of_veq $ by rw [map_val, attach_val]; exact attach_map_val _
lemma nonempty.map (h : s.nonempty) (f : α ↪ β) : (s.map f).nonempty :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h in ⟨f a, (mem_map' f).mpr ha⟩
end map
lemma range_add_one' (n : ℕ) :
range (n + 1) = insert 0 ((range n).map ⟨λi, i + 1, assume i j, nat.succ.inj⟩) :=
by ext (⟨⟩ | ⟨n⟩); simp [nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.zero_lt_succ n]
/-! ### image -/
section image
variables [decidable_eq β]
/-- `image f s` is the forward image of `s` under `f`. -/
def image (f : α → β) (s : finset α) : finset β := (s.1.map f).to_finset
@[simp] theorem image_val (f : α → β) (s : finset α) : (image f s).1 = (s.1.map f).erase_dup := rfl
@[simp] theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : (∅ : finset α).image f = ∅ := rfl
variables {f : α → β} {s : finset α}
@[simp] theorem mem_image {b : β} : b ∈ s.image f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b :=
by simp only [mem_def, image_val, mem_erase_dup, multiset.mem_map, exists_prop]
theorem mem_image_of_mem (f : α → β) {a} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ s.image f :=
mem_image.2 ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
lemma filter_mem_image_eq_image (f : α → β) (s : finset α) (t : finset β) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t) :
t.filter (λ y, y ∈ s.image f) = s.image f :=
by { ext, rw [mem_filter, mem_image],
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, and_iff_right_iff_imp, exists_imp_distrib],
rintros x xel rfl, exact h _ xel }
lemma fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image (f : α → β) (s : finset α) (y : β) :
(s.filter (λ x, f x = y)).nonempty ↔ y ∈ s.image f :=
by simp [finset.nonempty]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_image {f : α → β} : ↑(s.image f) = f '' ↑s :=
set.ext $ λ _, mem_image.trans set.mem_image_iff_bex.symm
lemma nonempty.image (h : s.nonempty) (f : α → β) : (s.image f).nonempty :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h in ⟨f a, mem_image_of_mem f ha⟩
@[simp]
lemma nonempty.image_iff (f : α → β) : (s.image f).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
⟨λ ⟨y, hy⟩, let ⟨x, hx, _⟩ := mem_image.mp hy in ⟨x, hx⟩, λ h, h.image f⟩
theorem image_to_finset [decidable_eq α] {s : multiset α} :
s.to_finset.image f = (s.map f).to_finset :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_image, multiset.mem_to_finset, exists_prop, multiset.mem_map]
theorem image_val_of_inj_on (H : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) : (image f s).1 = s.1.map f :=
multiset.erase_dup_eq_self.2 (nodup_map_on H s.2)
@[simp]
theorem image_id [decidable_eq α] : s.image id = s :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, id, exists_eq_right]
theorem image_image [decidable_eq γ] {g : β → γ} : (s.image f).image g = s.image (g ∘ f) :=
eq_of_veq $ by simp only [image_val, erase_dup_map_erase_dup_eq, multiset.map_map]
theorem image_subset_image {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.image f ⊆ s₂.image f :=
by simp only [subset_def, image_val, subset_erase_dup', erase_dup_subset',
multiset.map_subset_map h]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : finset α} {t : finset β} {f : α → β} :
s.image f ⊆ t ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t :=
calc s.image f ⊆ t ↔ f '' ↑s ⊆ ↑t : by norm_cast
... ↔ _ : set.image_subset_iff
theorem image_mono (f : α → β) : monotone (finset.image f) := λ _ _, image_subset_image
theorem coe_image_subset_range : ↑(s.image f) ⊆ set.range f :=
calc ↑(s.image f) = f '' ↑s : coe_image
... ⊆ set.range f : set.image_subset_range f ↑s
theorem image_filter {p : β → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
(s.image f).filter p = (s.filter (p ∘ f)).image f :=
ext $ λ b, by simp only [mem_filter, mem_image, exists_prop]; exact
⟨by rintro ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩; exact ⟨x, ⟨h1, h2⟩, rfl⟩,
by rintro ⟨x, ⟨h1, h2⟩, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩⟩
theorem image_union [decidable_eq α] {f : α → β} (s₁ s₂ : finset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).image f = s₁.image f ∪ s₂.image f :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_image, mem_union, exists_prop, or_and_distrib_right,
exists_or_distrib]
theorem image_inter [decidable_eq α] (s₁ s₂ : finset α) (hf : ∀x y, f x = f y → x = y) :
(s₁ ∩ s₂).image f = s₁.image f ∩ s₂.image f :=
ext $ by simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_inter]; exact λ b,
⟨λ ⟨a, ⟨m₁, m₂⟩, e⟩, ⟨⟨a, m₁, e⟩, ⟨a, m₂, e⟩⟩,
λ ⟨⟨a, m₁, e₁⟩, ⟨a', m₂, e₂⟩⟩, ⟨a, ⟨m₁, hf _ _ (e₂.trans e₁.symm) ▸ m₂⟩, e₁⟩⟩.
@[simp] theorem image_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : image f {a} = {f a} :=
ext $ λ x, by simpa only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left] using eq_comm
@[simp] theorem image_insert [decidable_eq α] (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : finset α) :
(insert a s).image f = insert (f a) (s.image f) :=
by simp only [insert_eq, image_singleton, image_union]
@[simp] theorem image_eq_empty : s.image f = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨λ h, eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem $
λ a m, ne_empty_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem _ m) h, λ e, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma attach_image_val [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} : s.attach.image subtype.val = s :=
eq_of_veq $ by rw [image_val, attach_val, multiset.attach_map_val, erase_dup_eq_self]
@[simp] lemma attach_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : finset α} :
attach (insert a s) = insert (⟨a, mem_insert_self a s⟩ : {x // x ∈ insert a s})
((attach s).image (λx, ⟨x.1, mem_insert_of_mem x.2⟩)) :=
ext $ λ ⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨or.cases_on (mem_insert.1 hx)
(λ h : x = a, λ _, mem_insert.2 $ or.inl $ subtype.eq h)
(λ h : x ∈ s, λ _, mem_insert_of_mem $ mem_image.2 $ ⟨⟨x, h⟩, mem_attach _ _, subtype.eq rfl⟩),
λ _, finset.mem_attach _ _⟩
theorem map_eq_image (f : α ↪ β) (s : finset α) : s.map f = s.image f :=
eq_of_veq $ (multiset.erase_dup_eq_self.2 (s.map f).2).symm
lemma image_const {s : finset α} (h : s.nonempty) (b : β) : s.image (λa, b) = singleton b :=
ext $ assume b', by simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_right,
h.bex, true_and, mem_singleton, eq_comm]
/--
Because `finset.image` requires a `decidable_eq` instances for the target type,
we can only construct a `functor finset` when working classically.
-/
instance [Π P, decidable P] : functor finset :=
{ map := λ α β f s, s.image f, }
instance [Π P, decidable P] : is_lawful_functor finset :=
{ id_map := λ α x, image_id,
comp_map := λ α β γ f g s, image_image.symm, }
/-- Given a finset `s` and a predicate `p`, `s.subtype p` is the finset of `subtype p` whose
elements belong to `s`. -/
protected def subtype {α} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : finset α) : finset (subtype p) :=
(s.filter p).attach.map ⟨λ x, ⟨x.1, (finset.mem_filter.1 x.2).2⟩,
λ x y H, subtype.eq $ subtype.mk.inj H⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_subtype {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {s : finset α} :
∀{a : subtype p}, a ∈ s.subtype p ↔ (a : α) ∈ s
| ⟨a, ha⟩ := by simp [finset.subtype, ha]
lemma subtype_eq_empty {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {s : finset α} :
s.subtype p = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, p x → x ∉ s :=
by simp [ext_iff, subtype.forall, subtype.coe_mk]; refl
/-- `s.subtype p` converts back to `s.filter p` with
`embedding.subtype`. -/
@[simp] lemma subtype_map (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
(s.subtype p).map (embedding.subtype _) = s.filter p :=
begin
ext x,
rw mem_map,
change (∃ a : {x // p x}, ∃ H, (a : α) = x) ↔ _,
split,
{ rintros ⟨y, hy, hyval⟩,
rw [mem_subtype, hyval] at hy,
rw mem_filter,
use hy,
rw ← hyval,
use y.property },
{ intro hx,
rw mem_filter at hx,
use ⟨⟨x, hx.2⟩, mem_subtype.2 hx.1, rfl⟩ }
end
/-- If all elements of a `finset` satisfy the predicate `p`,
`s.subtype p` converts back to `s` with `embedding.subtype`. -/
lemma subtype_map_of_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
(s.subtype p).map (embedding.subtype _) = s :=
by rw [subtype_map, filter_true_of_mem h]
/-- If a `finset` of a subtype is converted to the main type with
`embedding.subtype`, all elements of the result have the property of
the subtype. -/
lemma property_of_mem_map_subtype {p : α → Prop} (s : finset {x // p x}) {a : α}
(h : a ∈ s.map (embedding.subtype _)) : p a :=
begin
rcases mem_map.1 h with ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
exact x.2
end
/-- If a `finset` of a subtype is converted to the main type with
`embedding.subtype`, the result does not contain any value that does
not satisfy the property of the subtype. -/
lemma not_mem_map_subtype_of_not_property {p : α → Prop} (s : finset {x // p x})
{a : α} (h : ¬ p a) : a ∉ (s.map (embedding.subtype _)) :=
mt s.property_of_mem_map_subtype h
/-- If a `finset` of a subtype is converted to the main type with
`embedding.subtype`, the result is a subset of the set giving the
subtype. -/
lemma map_subtype_subset {t : set α} (s : finset t) :
↑(s.map (embedding.subtype _)) ⊆ t :=
begin
intros a ha,
rw mem_coe at ha,
convert property_of_mem_map_subtype s ha
end
lemma subset_image_iff {f : α → β}
{s : finset β} {t : set α} : ↑s ⊆ f '' t ↔ ∃s' : finset α, ↑s' ⊆ t ∧ s'.image f = s :=
begin
classical,
split, swap,
{ rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, rw [coe_image], exact set.image_subset f hs },
intro h, induction s using finset.induction with a s has ih h,
{ refine ⟨∅, set.empty_subset _, _⟩,
convert finset.image_empty _ },
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.insert_subset] at h,
rcases ih h.2 with ⟨s', hst, hsi⟩,
rcases h.1 with ⟨x, hxt, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨insert x s', _, _⟩,
{ rw [finset.coe_insert, set.insert_subset], exact ⟨hxt, hst⟩ },
rw [finset.image_insert, hsi],
congr
end
end image
end finset
theorem multiset.to_finset_map [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) (m : multiset α) :
(m.map f).to_finset = m.to_finset.image f :=
finset.val_inj.1 (multiset.erase_dup_map_erase_dup_eq _ _).symm
namespace finset
/-! ### card -/
section card
/-- `card s` is the cardinality (number of elements) of `s`. -/
def card (s : finset α) : nat := s.1.card
theorem card_def (s : finset α) : s.card = s.1.card := rfl
@[simp] lemma card_mk {m nodup} : (⟨m, nodup⟩ : finset α).card = m.card := rfl
@[simp] theorem card_empty : card (∅ : finset α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero {s : finset α} : card s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
theorem card_pos {s : finset α} : 0 < card s ↔ s.nonempty :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans $ (not_congr card_eq_zero).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem {s : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : card s ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 (ne_empty_of_mem h)
theorem card_eq_one {s : finset α} : s.card = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} :=
by cases s; simp only [multiset.card_eq_one, finset.card, ← val_inj, singleton_val]
theorem card_le_one {s : finset α} : s.card ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ s), a = b :=
begin
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl|⟨x, hx⟩, { simp },
refine (nat.succ_le_of_lt (card_pos.2 ⟨x, hx⟩)).le_iff_eq.trans (card_eq_one.trans ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩, simp },
{ exact λ h, ⟨x, eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨hx, λ y hy, h _ hy _ hx⟩⟩ }
end
theorem one_lt_card {s : finset α} : 1 < s.card ↔ ∃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ s), a ≠ b :=
by { rw ← not_iff_not, push_neg, exact card_le_one }
@[simp] theorem card_insert_of_not_mem [decidable_eq α]
{a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : card (insert a s) = card s + 1 :=
by simpa only [card_cons, card, insert_val] using
congr_arg multiset.card (ndinsert_of_not_mem h)
theorem card_insert_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : finset α}
(h : a ∈ s) : card (insert a s) = card s := by rw insert_eq_of_mem h
theorem card_insert_le [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : finset α) : card (insert a s) ≤ card s + 1 :=
by by_cases a ∈ s; [{rw [insert_eq_of_mem h], apply nat.le_add_right},
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]]
@[simp] theorem card_singleton (a : α) : card ({a} : finset α) = 1 := card_singleton _
lemma card_singleton_inter [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {s : finset α} : ({x} ∩ s).card ≤ 1 :=
begin
cases (finset.decidable_mem x s),
{ simp [finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h] },
{ simp [finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h] },
end
theorem card_erase_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : finset α} :
a ∈ s → card (erase s a) = pred (card s) := card_erase_of_mem
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : finset α} :
a ∈ s → card (erase s a) < card s := card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : finset α} :
card (erase s a) ≤ card s := card_erase_le
theorem pred_card_le_card_erase [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : finset α} :
card s - 1 ≤ card (erase s a) :=
begin
by_cases h : a ∈ s,
{ rw [card_erase_of_mem h], refl },
{ rw [erase_eq_of_not_mem h], apply nat.sub_le }
end
@[simp] theorem card_range (n : ℕ) : card (range n) = n := card_range n
@[simp] theorem card_attach {s : finset α} : card (attach s) = card s := multiset.card_attach
end card
end finset
theorem multiset.to_finset_card_le [decidable_eq α] (m : multiset α) : m.to_finset.card ≤ m.card :=
card_le_of_le (erase_dup_le _)
theorem list.to_finset_card_le [decidable_eq α] (l : list α) : l.to_finset.card ≤ l.length :=
multiset.to_finset_card_le ⟦l⟧
namespace finset
section card
theorem card_image_le [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} {s : finset α} : card (image f s) ≤ card s :=
by simpa only [card_map] using (s.1.map f).to_finset_card_le
theorem card_image_of_inj_on [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} {s : finset α}
(H : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) : card (image f s) = card s :=
by simp only [card, image_val_of_inj_on H, card_map]
theorem card_image_of_injective [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (s : finset α)
(H : injective f) : card (image f s) = card s :=
card_image_of_inj_on $ λ x _ y _ h, H h
lemma fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image (s : finset α) (f : α → β) [decidable_eq β] (y : β) :
(s.filter (λ x, f x = y)).card ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ s.image f :=
by { rw [←pos_iff_ne_zero, card_pos, fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image] }
@[simp] lemma card_map {α β} (f : α ↪ β) {s : finset α} : (s.map f).card = s.card :=
multiset.card_map _ _
@[simp] lemma card_subtype (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : finset α) :
(s.subtype p).card = (s.filter p).card :=
by simp [finset.subtype]
lemma card_eq_of_bijective {s : finset α} {n : ℕ}
(f : ∀i, i < n → α)
(hf : ∀a∈s, ∃i, ∃h:i<n, f i h = a) (hf' : ∀i (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀i j (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) :
card s = n :=
begin
classical,
have : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ ∃i (hi : i ∈ range n), f i (mem_range.1 hi) = a,
from assume a, ⟨assume ha, let ⟨i, hi, eq⟩ := hf a ha in ⟨i, mem_range.2 hi, eq⟩,
assume ⟨i, hi, eq⟩, eq ▸ hf' i (mem_range.1 hi)⟩,
have : s = ((range n).attach.image $ λi, f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)),
by simpa only [ext_iff, mem_image, exists_prop, subtype.exists, mem_attach, true_and],
calc card s = card ((range n).attach.image $ λi, f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)) :
by rw [this]
... = card ((range n).attach) :
card_image_of_injective _ $ assume ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ eq,
subtype.eq $ f_inj i j (mem_range.1 hi) (mem_range.1 hj) eq
... = card (range n) : card_attach
... = n : card_range n
end
lemma card_eq_succ [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {n : ℕ} :
s.card = n + 1 ↔ (∃a t, a ∉ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ card t = n) :=
iff.intro
(assume eq,
have 0 < card s, from eq.symm ▸ nat.zero_lt_succ _,
let ⟨a, has⟩ := card_pos.mp this in
⟨a, s.erase a, s.not_mem_erase a, insert_erase has,
by simp only [eq, card_erase_of_mem has, pred_succ]⟩)
(assume ⟨a, t, hat, s_eq, n_eq⟩, s_eq ▸ n_eq ▸ card_insert_of_not_mem hat)
theorem card_le_of_subset {s t : finset α} : s ⊆ t → card s ≤ card t :=
multiset.card_le_of_le ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
theorem card_filter_le (s : finset α) (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
card (s.filter p) ≤ card s :=
card_le_of_subset $ filter_subset _ _
theorem eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : card t ≤ card s) : s = t :=
eq_of_veq $ multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (val_le_iff.mpr h) h₂
lemma card_lt_card {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊂ t) : s.card < t.card :=
card_lt_of_lt (val_lt_iff.2 h)
lemma card_le_card_of_inj_on {s : finset α} {t : finset β}
(f : α → β) (hf : ∀a∈s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : ∀a₁∈s, ∀a₂∈s, f a₁ = f a₂ → a₁ = a₂) :
card s ≤ card t :=
begin
classical,
calc card s = card (s.image f) : by rw [card_image_of_inj_on f_inj]
... ≤ card t : card_le_of_subset $ image_subset_iff.2 hf
end
/--
If there are more pigeons than pigeonholes, then there are two pigeons
in the same pigeonhole.
-/
lemma exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to {s : finset α} {t : finset β} (hc : t.card < s.card)
{f : α → β} (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) :
∃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y :=
begin
classical, by_contra hz, push_neg at hz,
refine hc.not_le (card_le_card_of_inj_on f hf _),
intros x hx y hy, contrapose, exact hz x hx y hy,
end
lemma le_card_of_inj_on_range {n} {s : finset α}
(f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀i<n, f i ∈ s) (f_inj : ∀ (i<n) (j<n), f i = f j → i = j) : n ≤ card s :=
calc n = card (range n) : (card_range n).symm
... ≤ card s : card_le_card_of_inj_on f (by simpa only [mem_range]) (by simpa only [mem_range])
/-- Suppose that, given objects defined on all strict subsets of any finset `s`, one knows how to
define an object on `s`. Then one can inductively define an object on all finsets, starting from
the empty set and iterating. This can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def strong_induction_on {p : finset α → Sort*} :
∀ (s : finset α), (∀s, (∀t ⊂ s, p t) → p s) → p s
| ⟨s, nd⟩ ih := multiset.strong_induction_on s
(λ s IH nd, ih ⟨s, nd⟩ (λ ⟨t, nd'⟩ ss, IH t (val_lt_iff.2 ss) nd')) nd
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma case_strong_induction_on [decidable_eq α] {p : finset α → Prop}
(s : finset α) (h₀ : p ∅) (h₁ : ∀ a s, a ∉ s → (∀t ⊆ s, p t) → p (insert a s)) : p s :=
finset.strong_induction_on s $ λ s,
finset.induction_on s (λ _, h₀) $ λ a s n _ ih, h₁ a s n $
λ t ss, ih _ (lt_of_le_of_lt ss (ssubset_insert n) : t < _)
lemma card_congr {s : finset α} {t : finset β} (f : Π a ∈ s, β)
(h₁ : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t) (h₂ : ∀ a b ha hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b)
(h₃ : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) : s.card = t.card :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact
calc s.card = s.attach.card : card_attach.symm
... = (s.attach.image (λ (a : {a // a ∈ s}), f a.1 a.2)).card :
eq.symm (card_image_of_injective _ (λ a b h, subtype.eq (h₂ _ _ _ _ h)))
... = t.card : congr_arg card (finset.ext $ λ b,
⟨λ h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := mem_image.1 h in ha₂ ▸ h₁ _ _,
λ h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := h₃ b h in mem_image.2 ⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, by simp [ha₂]⟩⟩)
lemma card_union_add_card_inter [decidable_eq α] (s t : finset α) :
(s ∪ t).card + (s ∩ t).card = s.card + t.card :=
finset.induction_on t (by simp) $ λ a r har, by by_cases a ∈ s; simp *; cc
lemma card_union_le [decidable_eq α] (s t : finset α) :
(s ∪ t).card ≤ s.card + t.card :=
card_union_add_card_inter s t ▸ le_add_right _ _
lemma card_union_eq [decidable_eq α] {s t : finset α} (h : disjoint s t) :
(s ∪ t).card = s.card + t.card :=
begin
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter],
convert (add_zero _).symm, rw [card_eq_zero], rwa [disjoint_iff] at h
end
lemma surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le {s : finset α} {t : finset β}
(f : Π a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(hst : card t ≤ card s) :
(∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq β; exact
λ b hb,
have h : card (image (λ (a : {a // a ∈ s}), f a a.prop) (attach s)) = card s,
from @card_attach _ s ▸ card_image_of_injective _
(λ ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ h, subtype.eq $ hinj _ _ _ _ h),
have h₁ : image (λ a : {a // a ∈ s}, f a a.prop) s.attach = t :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (λ b h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := mem_image.1 h in
ha₂ ▸ hf _ _) (by simp [hst, h]),
begin
rw ← h₁ at hb,
rcases mem_image.1 hb with ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
exact ⟨a, a.2, ha₂.symm⟩,
end
open function
lemma inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le {s : finset α} {t : finset β}
(f : Π a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha)
(hst : card s ≤ card t)
⦃a₁ a₂⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) (ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s)
(ha₁a₂: f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) : a₁ = a₂ :=
by haveI : inhabited {x // x ∈ s} := ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁⟩⟩; exact
let f' : {x // x ∈ s} → {x // x ∈ t} := λ x, ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf x.1 x.2⟩ in
let g : {x // x ∈ t} → {x // x ∈ s} :=
@surj_inv _ _ f'
(λ x, let ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩ := hsurj x.1 x.2 in ⟨⟨y, hy₁⟩, subtype.eq hy₂.symm⟩) in
have hg : injective g, from injective_surj_inv _,
have hsg : surjective g, from λ x,
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le (λ (x : {x // x ∈ t}) (hx : x ∈ t.attach), g x)
(λ x _, show (g x) ∈ s.attach, from mem_attach _ _)
(λ x y _ _ hxy, hg hxy) (by simpa) x (mem_attach _ _) in
⟨y, hy.snd.symm⟩,
have hif : injective f',
from (left_inverse_of_surjective_of_right_inverse hsg
(right_inverse_surj_inv _)).injective,
subtype.ext_iff_val.1 (@hif ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ (subtype.eq ha₁a₂))
end card
section bUnion
/-!
### bUnion
This section is about the bounded union of an indexed family `t : α → finset β` of finite sets
over a finite set `s : finset α`.
-/
variables [decidable_eq β] {s : finset α} {t : α → finset β}
/-- `bUnion s t` is the union of `t x` over `x ∈ s`.
(This was formerly `bind` due to the monad structure on types with `decidable_eq`.) -/
protected def bUnion (s : finset α) (t : α → finset β) : finset β :=
(s.1.bind (λ a, (t a).1)).to_finset
@[simp] theorem bUnion_val (s : finset α) (t : α → finset β) :
(s.bUnion t).1 = (s.1.bind (λ a, (t a).1)).erase_dup := rfl
@[simp] theorem bUnion_empty : finset.bUnion ∅ t = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_bUnion {b : β} : b ∈ s.bUnion t ↔ ∃a∈s, b ∈ t a :=
by simp only [mem_def, bUnion_val, mem_erase_dup, mem_bind, exists_prop]
@[simp] theorem bUnion_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} : (insert a s).bUnion t = t a ∪ s.bUnion t :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_bUnion, exists_prop, mem_union, mem_insert,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
-- ext $ λ x, by simp [or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib]
@[simp] lemma singleton_bUnion {a : α} : finset.bUnion {a} t = t a :=
begin
classical,
rw [← insert_emptyc_eq, bUnion_insert, bUnion_empty, union_empty]
end
theorem bUnion_inter (s : finset α) (f : α → finset β) (t : finset β) :
s.bUnion f ∩ t = s.bUnion (λ x, f x ∩ t) :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_bUnion, mem_inter],
tauto
end
theorem inter_bUnion (t : finset β) (s : finset α) (f : α → finset β) :
t ∩ s.bUnion f = s.bUnion (λ x, t ∩ f x) :=
by rw [inter_comm, bUnion_inter]; simp [inter_comm]
theorem image_bUnion [decidable_eq γ] {f : α → β} {s : finset α} {t : β → finset γ} :
(s.image f).bUnion t = s.bUnion (λa, t (f a)) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
finset.induction_on s rfl (λ a s has ih,
by simp only [image_insert, bUnion_insert, ih])
theorem bUnion_image [decidable_eq γ] {s : finset α} {t : α → finset β} {f : β → γ} :
(s.bUnion t).image f = s.bUnion (λa, (t a).image f) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
finset.induction_on s rfl (λ a s has ih,
by simp only [bUnion_insert, image_union, ih])
theorem bind_to_finset [decidable_eq α] (s : multiset α) (t : α → multiset β) :
(s.bind t).to_finset = s.to_finset.bUnion (λa, (t a).to_finset) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset, mem_bUnion, multiset.mem_bind, exists_prop]
lemma bUnion_mono {t₁ t₂ : α → finset β} (h : ∀a∈s, t₁ a ⊆ t₂ a) : s.bUnion t₁ ⊆ s.bUnion t₂ :=
have ∀b a, a ∈ s → b ∈ t₁ a → (∃ (a : α), a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t₂ a),
from assume b a ha hb, ⟨a, ha, finset.mem_of_subset (h a ha) hb⟩,
by simpa only [subset_iff, mem_bUnion, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp, exists_prop]
lemma bUnion_subset_bUnion_of_subset_left {α : Type*} {s₁ s₂ : finset α}
(t : α → finset β) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.bUnion t ⊆ s₂.bUnion t :=
begin
intro x,
simp only [and_imp, mem_bUnion, exists_prop],
exact Exists.imp (λ a ha, ⟨h ha.1, ha.2⟩)
end
lemma bUnion_singleton {f : α → β} : s.bUnion (λa, {f a}) = s.image f :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_bUnion, mem_image, mem_singleton, eq_comm]
@[simp] lemma bUnion_singleton_eq_self [decidable_eq α] :
s.bUnion (singleton : α → finset α) = s :=
by { rw bUnion_singleton, exact image_id }
lemma bUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {t : finset β} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t) :
t.bUnion (λa, s.filter $ (λc, f c = a)) = s :=
ext $ λ b, by simpa using h b
lemma image_bUnion_filter_eq [decidable_eq α] (s : finset β) (g : β → α) :
(s.image g).bUnion (λa, s.filter $ (λc, g c = a)) = s :=
bUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to (λ x, mem_image_of_mem g)
lemma erase_bUnion (f : α → finset β) (s : finset α) (b : β) :
(s.bUnion f).erase b = s.bUnion (λ x, (f x).erase b) :=
by { ext, simp only [finset.mem_bUnion, iff_self, exists_and_distrib_left, finset.mem_erase] }
end bUnion
/-! ### prod -/
section prod
variables {s : finset α} {t : finset β}
/-- `product s t` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def product (s : finset α) (t : finset β) : finset (α × β) := ⟨_, nodup_product s.2 t.2⟩
@[simp] theorem product_val : (s.product t).1 = s.1.product t.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {p : α × β} : p ∈ s.product t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t := mem_product
theorem subset_product [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] {s : finset (α × β)} :
s ⊆ (s.image prod.fst).product (s.image prod.snd) :=
λ p hp, mem_product.2 ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hp, mem_image_of_mem _ hp⟩
theorem product_eq_bUnion [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] (s : finset α) (t : finset β) :
s.product t = s.bUnion (λa, t.image $ λb, (a, b)) :=
ext $ λ ⟨x, y⟩, by simp only [mem_product, mem_bUnion, mem_image, exists_prop, prod.mk.inj_iff,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
@[simp] theorem card_product (s : finset α) (t : finset β) : card (s.product t) = card s * card t :=
multiset.card_product _ _
theorem filter_product (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q] :
(s.product t).filter (λ (x : α × β), p x.1 ∧ q x.2) = (s.filter p).product (t.filter q) :=
by { ext ⟨a, b⟩, simp only [mem_filter, mem_product], finish, }
lemma filter_product_card (s : finset α) (t : finset β)
(p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q] :
((s.product t).filter (λ (x : α × β), p x.1 ↔ q x.2)).card =
(s.filter p).card * (t.filter q).card + (s.filter (not ∘ p)).card * (t.filter (not ∘ q)).card :=
begin
classical,
rw [← card_product, ← card_product, ← filter_product, ← filter_product, ← card_union_eq],
{ apply congr_arg, ext ⟨a, b⟩, simp only [filter_union_right, mem_filter, mem_product],
split; intros; finish, },
{ rw disjoint_iff, change _ ∩ _ = ∅, ext ⟨a, b⟩, rw mem_inter, finish, },
end
end prod
/-! ### sigma -/
section sigma
variables {σ : α → Type*} {s : finset α} {t : Πa, finset (σ a)}
/-- `sigma s t` is the set of dependent pairs `⟨a, b⟩` such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t a`. -/
protected def sigma (s : finset α) (t : Πa, finset (σ a)) : finset (Σa, σ a) :=
⟨_, nodup_sigma s.2 (λ a, (t a).2)⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {p : sigma σ} : p ∈ s.sigma t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t (p.1) := mem_sigma
theorem sigma_mono {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Πa, finset (σ a)}
(H1 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (H2 : ∀a, t₁ a ⊆ t₂ a) : s₁.sigma t₁ ⊆ s₂.sigma t₂ :=
λ ⟨x, sx⟩ H, let ⟨H3, H4⟩ := mem_sigma.1 H in mem_sigma.2 ⟨H1 H3, H2 x H4⟩
theorem sigma_eq_bUnion [decidable_eq (Σ a, σ a)] (s : finset α)
(t : Πa, finset (σ a)) :
s.sigma t = s.bUnion (λa, (t a).map $ embedding.sigma_mk a) :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [and.left_comm] }
end sigma
/-! ### disjoint -/
section disjoint
variable [decidable_eq α]
theorem disjoint_left {s t : finset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
by simp only [_root_.disjoint, inf_eq_inter, le_iff_subset, subset_iff, mem_inter, not_and,
and_imp]; refl
theorem disjoint_val {s t : finset α} : disjoint s t ↔ s.1.disjoint t.1 :=
disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty {s t : finset α} : disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
instance decidable_disjoint (U V : finset α) : decidable (disjoint U V) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by apply_instance) eq_bot_iff
theorem disjoint_right {s t : finset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ t → a ∉ s :=
by rw [disjoint.comm, disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {s t : finset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {s t u : finset α} (h : s ⊆ u) (d : disjoint u t) : disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.2 (λ x m₁, (disjoint_left.1 d) (h m₁))
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {s t u : finset α} (h : t ⊆ u) (d : disjoint s u) : disjoint s t :=
disjoint_right.2 (λ x m₁, (disjoint_right.1 d) (h m₁))
@[simp] theorem disjoint_empty_left (s : finset α) : disjoint ∅ s := disjoint_bot_left
@[simp] theorem disjoint_empty_right (s : finset α) : disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right
@[simp] theorem singleton_disjoint {s : finset α} {a : α} : disjoint (singleton a) s ↔ a ∉ s :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, mem_singleton, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_singleton {s : finset α} {a : α} : disjoint s (singleton a) ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint.comm.trans singleton_disjoint
@[simp] theorem disjoint_insert_left {a : α} {s t : finset α} :
disjoint (insert a s) t ↔ a ∉ t ∧ disjoint s t :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, mem_insert, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_insert_right {a : α} {s t : finset α} :
disjoint s (insert a t) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ disjoint s t :=
disjoint.comm.trans $ by rw [disjoint_insert_left, disjoint.comm]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_union_left {s t u : finset α} :
disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ disjoint s u ∧ disjoint t u :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_union_right {s t u : finset α} :
disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ disjoint s t ∧ disjoint s u :=
by simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
lemma sdiff_disjoint {s t : finset α} : disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 $ assume a ha, (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
lemma disjoint_sdiff {s t : finset α} : disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
lemma disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : finset α) : disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (inter_subset_right _ _) sdiff_disjoint
lemma sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint {s t : finset α} : s \ t = s ↔ disjoint s t :=
by rw [sdiff_eq_self, subset_empty, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
lemma sdiff_eq_self_of_disjoint {s t : finset α} (h : disjoint s t) : s \ t = s :=
sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint.2 h
lemma disjoint_self_iff_empty (s : finset α) : disjoint s s ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_self
lemma disjoint_bUnion_left {ι : Type*}
(s : finset ι) (f : ι → finset α) (t : finset α) :
disjoint (s.bUnion f) t ↔ (∀i∈s, disjoint (f i) t) :=
begin
classical,
refine s.induction _ _,
{ simp only [forall_mem_empty_iff, bUnion_empty, disjoint_empty_left] },
{ assume i s his ih,
simp only [disjoint_union_left, bUnion_insert, his, forall_mem_insert, ih] }
end
lemma disjoint_bUnion_right {ι : Type*}
(s : finset α) (t : finset ι) (f : ι → finset α) :
disjoint s (t.bUnion f) ↔ (∀i∈t, disjoint s (f i)) :=
by simpa only [disjoint.comm] using disjoint_bUnion_left t f s
@[simp] theorem card_disjoint_union {s t : finset α} (h : disjoint s t) :
card (s ∪ t) = card s + card t :=
by rw [← card_union_add_card_inter, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 h, card_empty, add_zero]
theorem card_sdiff {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : card (t \ s) = card t - card s :=
suffices card (t \ s) = card ((t \ s) ∪ s) - card s, by rwa sdiff_union_of_subset h at this,
by rw [card_disjoint_union sdiff_disjoint, nat.add_sub_cancel]
lemma disjoint_filter {s : finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q] :
disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬ q x) :=
by split; simp [disjoint_left] {contextual := tt}
lemma disjoint_filter_filter {s t : finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
[decidable_pred q] :
(disjoint s t) → disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) :=
disjoint.mono (filter_subset _ _) (filter_subset _ _)
lemma disjoint_iff_disjoint_coe {α : Type*} {a b : finset α} [decidable_eq α] :
disjoint a b ↔ disjoint (↑a : set α) (↑b : set α) :=
by { rw [finset.disjoint_left, set.disjoint_left], refl }
lemma filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card {α : Type*} {s : finset α} (p : α → Prop)
[decidable_pred p] :
(s.filter p).card + (s.filter (not ∘ p)).card = s.card :=
by { classical, simp [← card_union_eq, filter_union_filter_neg_eq, disjoint_filter], }
end disjoint
section self_prod
variables (s : finset α) [decidable_eq α]
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the diagonal, `s.diag` is the set of pairs of the form `(a, a)` for
`a ∈ s`. -/
def diag := (s.product s).filter (λ (a : α × α), a.fst = a.snd)
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the off-diagonal, `s.off_diag` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` with `a ≠ b`
for `a, b ∈ s`. -/
def off_diag := (s.product s).filter (λ (a : α × α), a.fst ≠ a.snd)
@[simp] lemma mem_diag (x : α × α) : x ∈ s.diag ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.1 = x.2 :=
by { simp only [diag, mem_filter, mem_product], split; intros; finish, }
@[simp] lemma mem_off_diag (x : α × α) : x ∈ s.off_diag ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ s ∧ x.1 ≠ x.2 :=
by { simp only [off_diag, mem_filter, mem_product], split; intros; finish, }
@[simp] lemma diag_card : (diag s).card = s.card :=
begin
suffices : diag s = s.image (λ a, (a, a)), { rw this, apply card_image_of_inj_on, finish, },
ext ⟨a₁, a₂⟩, rw mem_diag, split; intros; finish,
end
@[simp] lemma off_diag_card : (off_diag s).card = s.card * s.card - s.card :=
begin
suffices : (diag s).card + (off_diag s).card = s.card * s.card,
{ nth_rewrite 2 ← s.diag_card, finish, },
rw ← card_product,
apply filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card,
end
end self_prod
/--
Given a set A and a set B inside it, we can shrink A to any appropriate size, and keep B
inside it.
-/
lemma exists_intermediate_set {A B : finset α} (i : ℕ)
(h₁ : i + card B ≤ card A) (h₂ : B ⊆ A) :
∃ (C : finset α), B ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A ∧ card C = i + card B :=
begin
classical,
rcases nat.le.dest h₁ with ⟨k, _⟩,
clear h₁,
induction k with k ih generalizing A,
{ exact ⟨A, h₂, subset.refl _, h.symm⟩ },
{ have : (A \ B).nonempty,
{ rw [← card_pos, card_sdiff h₂, ← h, nat.add_right_comm,
nat.add_sub_cancel, nat.add_succ],
apply nat.succ_pos },
rcases this with ⟨a, ha⟩,
have z : i + card B + k = card (erase A a),
{ rw [card_erase_of_mem, ← h, nat.add_succ, nat.pred_succ],
rw mem_sdiff at ha,
exact ha.1 },
rcases ih _ z with ⟨B', hB', B'subA', cards⟩,
{ exact ⟨B', hB', trans B'subA' (erase_subset _ _), cards⟩ },
{ rintros t th,
apply mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem _ (h₂ th),
rintro rfl,
exact not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right th ha } }
end
/-- We can shrink A to any smaller size. -/
lemma exists_smaller_set (A : finset α) (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i ≤ card A) :
∃ (B : finset α), B ⊆ A ∧ card B = i :=
let ⟨B, _, x₁, x₂⟩ := exists_intermediate_set i (by simpa) (empty_subset A) in ⟨B, x₁, x₂⟩
/-- `finset.fin_range k` is the finset `{0, 1, ..., k-1}`, as a `finset (fin k)`. -/
def fin_range (k : ℕ) : finset (fin k) :=
⟨list.fin_range k, list.nodup_fin_range k⟩
@[simp]
lemma fin_range_card {k : ℕ} : (fin_range k).card = k :=
by simp [fin_range]
@[simp]
lemma mem_fin_range {k : ℕ} (m : fin k) : m ∈ fin_range k :=
list.mem_fin_range m
@[simp] lemma coe_fin_range (k : ℕ) : (fin_range k : set (fin k)) = set.univ :=
set.eq_univ_of_forall mem_fin_range
/-- Given a finset `s` of `ℕ` contained in `{0,..., n-1}`, the corresponding finset in `fin n`
is `s.attach_fin h` where `h` is a proof that all elements of `s` are less than `n`. -/
def attach_fin (s : finset ℕ) {n : ℕ} (h : ∀ m ∈ s, m < n) : finset (fin n) :=
⟨s.1.pmap (λ a ha, ⟨a, ha⟩) h, multiset.nodup_pmap (λ _ _ _ _, fin.veq_of_eq) s.2⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_attach_fin {n : ℕ} {s : finset ℕ} (h : ∀ m ∈ s, m < n) {a : fin n} :
a ∈ s.attach_fin h ↔ (a : ℕ) ∈ s :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := multiset.mem_pmap.1 h in hb₂ ▸ hb₁,
λ h, multiset.mem_pmap.2 ⟨a, h, fin.eta _ _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma card_attach_fin {n : ℕ} (s : finset ℕ) (h : ∀ m ∈ s, m < n) :
(s.attach_fin h).card = s.card := multiset.card_pmap _ _ _
/-! ### choose -/
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def choose_x (hp : (∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a)) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
multiset.choose_x p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α := choose_x p l hp
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_x p l hp).property
lemma choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l := (choose_spec _ _ _).1
lemma choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) := (choose_spec _ _ _).2
end choose
theorem lt_wf {α} : well_founded (@has_lt.lt (finset α) _) :=
have H : subrelation (@has_lt.lt (finset α) _)
(inv_image (<) card),
from λ x y hxy, card_lt_card hxy,
subrelation.wf H $ inv_image.wf _ $ nat.lt_wf
end finset
namespace equiv
/-- Given an equivalence `α` to `β`, produce an equivalence between `finset α` and `finset β`. -/
protected def finset_congr (e : α ≃ β) : finset α ≃ finset β :=
{ to_fun := λ s, s.map e.to_embedding,
inv_fun := λ s, s.map e.symm.to_embedding,
left_inv := λ s, by simp [finset.map_map],
right_inv := λ s, by simp [finset.map_map] }
@[simp] lemma finset_congr_apply (e : α ≃ β) (s : finset α) :
e.finset_congr s = s.map e.to_embedding :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma finset_congr_refl :
(equiv.refl α).finset_congr = equiv.refl _ :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma finset_congr_symm (e : α ≃ β) :
e.finset_congr.symm = e.symm.finset_congr :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma finset_congr_trans (e : α ≃ β) (e' : β ≃ γ) :
e.finset_congr.trans (e'.finset_congr) = (e.trans e').finset_congr :=
by { ext, simp [-finset.mem_map, -equiv.trans_to_embedding] }
end equiv
namespace list
variable [decidable_eq α]
theorem to_finset_card_of_nodup {l : list α} (h : l.nodup) : l.to_finset.card = l.length :=
congr_arg card $ (@multiset.erase_dup_eq_self α _ l).2 h
end list
namespace multiset
variable [decidable_eq α]
theorem to_finset_card_of_nodup {l : multiset α} (h : l.nodup) : l.to_finset.card = l.card :=
congr_arg card $ (@multiset.erase_dup_eq_self α _ l).2 h
lemma disjoint_to_finset (m1 m2 : multiset α) :
_root_.disjoint m1.to_finset m2.to_finset ↔ m1.disjoint m2 :=
begin
rw finset.disjoint_iff_ne,
split,
{ intro h,
intros a ha1 ha2,
rw ← multiset.mem_to_finset at ha1 ha2,
exact h _ ha1 _ ha2 rfl },
{ rintros h a ha b hb rfl,
rw multiset.mem_to_finset at ha hb,
exact h ha hb }
end
end multiset
|
114280ac4c3d9197528f5c8c3583c7d20c8bc4aa | e0f9ba56b7fedc16ef8697f6caeef5898b435143 | /src/measure_theory/simple_func_dense.lean | e047894f3d86607227cdc21b98ccce6f924e04c4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anrddh/mathlib | 6a374da53c7e3a35cb0298b0cd67824efef362b4 | a4266a01d2dcb10de19369307c986d038c7bb6a6 | refs/heads/master | 1,656,710,827,909 | 1,589,560,456,000 | 1,589,560,456,000 | 264,271,800 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,589,568,062,000 | 1,589,568,061,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,946 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import measure_theory.l1_space
/-!
# Density of simple functions
Show that each Borel measurable function can be approximated,
both pointwise and in `L¹` norm, by a sequence of simple functions.
-/
noncomputable theory
open set filter topological_space
open_locale classical topological_space
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Type*}
namespace measure_theory
open ennreal nat metric
open_locale measure_theory
variables [measure_space α] [normed_group β] [second_countable_topology β]
[measurable_space β] [borel_space β]
local infixr ` →ₛ `:25 := simple_func
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces.
lemma simple_func_sequence_tendsto {f : α → β} (hf : measurable f) :
∃ (F : ℕ → (α →ₛ β)), ∀ x : α, tendsto (λ n, F n x) at_top (𝓝 (f x)) ∧
∀ n, ∥F n x∥ ≤ ∥f x∥ + ∥f x∥ :=
-- enumerate a countable dense subset {e k} of β
let ⟨D, ⟨D_countable, D_dense⟩⟩ := @separable_space.exists_countable_closure_eq_univ β _ _ in
let e := enumerate_countable D_countable 0 in
let E := range e in
have E_dense : closure E = univ :=
dense_of_subset_dense (subset_range_enumerate D_countable 0) D_dense,
let A' (N k : ℕ) : set α :=
f ⁻¹' (metric.ball (e k) (1 / (N+1 : ℝ)) \ metric.ball 0 (1 / (N+1 : ℝ))) in
let A N := disjointed (A' N) in
have is_measurable_A' : ∀ {N k}, is_measurable (A' N k) :=
λ N k, hf.preimage $ is_measurable.inter is_measurable_ball $ is_measurable.compl is_measurable_ball,
have is_measurable_A : ∀ {N k}, is_measurable (A N k) :=
λ N, is_measurable.disjointed $ λ k, is_measurable_A',
have A_subset_A' : ∀ {N k x}, x ∈ A N k → x ∈ A' N k := λ N k, inter_subset_left _ _,
have dist_ek_fx' : ∀ {x N k}, x ∈ A' N k → (dist (e k) (f x) < 1 / (N+1 : ℝ)) :=
λ x N k, by { rw [dist_comm], simpa using (λ a b, a) },
have dist_ek_fx : ∀ {x N k}, x ∈ A N k → (dist (e k) (f x) < 1 / (N+1 : ℝ)) :=
λ x N k h, dist_ek_fx' (A_subset_A' h),
have norm_fx' : ∀ {x N k}, x ∈ A' N k → (1 / (N+1 : ℝ)) ≤ ∥f x∥ := λ x N k, by simp [ball_0_eq],
have norm_fx : ∀ {x N k}, x ∈ A N k → (1 / (N+1 : ℝ)) ≤ ∥f x∥ := λ x N k h, norm_fx' (A_subset_A' h),
-- construct the desired sequence of simple functions
let M N x := nat.find_greatest (λ M, x ∈ ⋃ k ≤ N, (A M k)) N in
let k N x := nat.find_greatest (λ k, x ∈ A (M N x) k) N in
let F N x := if x ∈ ⋃ M ≤ N, ⋃ k ≤ N, A M k then e (k N x) else 0 in
-- prove properties of the construction above
have k_unique : ∀ {M k k' x}, x ∈ A M k ∧ x ∈ A M k' → k = k' := λ M k k' x h,
begin
by_contradiction k_ne_k',
have NE : (A M k ∩ A M k').nonempty, from ⟨x, h⟩,
have E : A M k ∩ A M k' = ∅ := disjoint_disjointed' k k' k_ne_k',
exact NE.ne_empty E,
end,
have x_mem_Union_k : ∀ {N x}, (x ∈ ⋃ M ≤ N, ⋃ k ≤ N, A M k) → x ∈ ⋃ k ≤ N, A (M N x) k :=
λ N x h,
@nat.find_greatest_spec (λ M, x ∈ ⋃ k ≤ N, (A M k)) _ N (
let ⟨M, hM⟩ := mem_Union.1 (h) in
let ⟨hM₁, hM₂⟩ := mem_Union.1 hM in
⟨M, ⟨hM₁, hM₂⟩⟩),
have x_mem_A : ∀ {N x}, (x ∈ ⋃ M ≤ N, ⋃ k ≤ N, A M k) → x ∈ A (M N x) (k N x) :=
λ N x h,
@nat.find_greatest_spec (λ k, x ∈ A (M N x) k) _ N (
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := mem_Union.1 (x_mem_Union_k h) in
let ⟨hk₁, hk₂⟩ := mem_Union.1 hk in
⟨k, ⟨hk₁, hk₂⟩⟩),
have x_mem_A' : ∀ {N x}, (x ∈ ⋃ M ≤ N, ⋃ k ≤ N, A M k) → x ∈ A' (M N x) (k N x) :=
λ N x h, mem_of_subset_of_mem (inter_subset_left _ _) (x_mem_A h),
-- prove that for all N, (F N) has finite range
have F_finite : ∀ {N}, finite (range (F N)) :=
begin
assume N, apply finite_range_ite,
{ rw range_comp, apply finite_image, exact finite_range_find_greatest },
{ exact finite_range_const }
end,
-- prove that for all N, (F N) is a measurable function
have F_measurable : ∀ {N}, measurable (F N) :=
begin
assume N, refine measurable.if _ _ measurable_const,
-- show `is_measurable {a : α | a ∈ ⋃ (M : ℕ) (H : M ≤ N) (k : ℕ) (H : k ≤ N), A M k}`
{ rw set_of_mem_eq, simp [is_measurable.Union, is_measurable.Union_Prop, is_measurable_A] },
-- show `measurable (λ (x : α), e (k N x))`
apply measurable.comp measurable_from_nat, apply measurable_find_greatest,
assume k' k'_le_N, by_cases k'_eq_0 : k' = 0,
-- if k' = 0
have : {x | k N x = 0} = (-⋃ (M : ℕ) (H : M ≤ N) (k : ℕ) (H : k ≤ N), A M k) ∪
(⋃ (m ≤ N), A m 0 - ⋃ m' (hmm' : m < m') (hm'N : m' ≤ N) (k ≤ N), A m' k),
{ ext, split,
{ rw [mem_set_of_eq, mem_union_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_compl_eq, not_not_mem],
assume k_eq_0 x_mem,
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_Union, not_and, sub_eq_diff, mem_diff],
refine ⟨M N x, ⟨nat.find_greatest_le, ⟨by { rw ← k_eq_0, exact x_mem_A x_mem} , _⟩⟩⟩,
assume m hMm hmN k k_le_N,
have := nat.find_greatest_is_greatest _ m ⟨hMm, hmN⟩,
{ simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_Union, not_and] at this, exact this k k_le_N },
{ exact ⟨M N x, ⟨nat.find_greatest_le, x_mem_Union_k x_mem⟩⟩ } },
{ simp only [mem_set_of_eq, mem_union_eq, mem_compl_eq],
by_cases x_mem : (x ∉ ⋃ (M : ℕ) (H : M ≤ N) (k : ℕ) (H : k ≤ N), A M k),
{ intro, apply find_greatest_eq_zero, assume k k_le_N hx,
have : x ∈ ⋃ (M : ℕ) (H : M ≤ N) (k : ℕ) (H : k ≤ N), A M k,
{ simp only [mem_Union], use [M N x, nat.find_greatest_le, k, k_le_N, hx] },
contradiction },
{ rw not_not_mem at x_mem, assume h, cases h, contradiction,
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_Union, not_and, sub_eq_diff, mem_diff] at h,
rcases h with ⟨m, ⟨m_le_N, ⟨hx, hm⟩⟩⟩,
by_cases m_lt_M : m < M N x,
{ have := hm (M N x) m_lt_M nat.find_greatest_le (k N x) nat.find_greatest_le,
have := x_mem_A x_mem,
contradiction },
rw not_lt at m_lt_M, by_cases m_gt_M : m > M N x,
{ have := nat.find_greatest_is_greatest _ m ⟨m_gt_M, m_le_N⟩,
{ have : x ∈ ⋃ k ≤ N, A m k,
{ exact mem_bUnion (nat.zero_le N) hx },
contradiction },
{ exact ⟨m, m_le_N, mem_bUnion (nat.zero_le _) hx⟩ } },
rw not_lt at m_gt_M, have M_eq_m := le_antisymm m_lt_M m_gt_M,
rw ← k'_eq_0, exact k_unique ⟨x_mem_A x_mem, by { rw [k'_eq_0, M_eq_m], exact hx }⟩ } } },
-- end of `have`
rw [k'_eq_0, this], apply is_measurable.union,
{ apply is_measurable.compl,
simp [is_measurable.Union, is_measurable.Union_Prop, is_measurable_A] },
{ simp [is_measurable.Union, is_measurable.Union_Prop, is_measurable.diff, is_measurable_A] },
-- if k' ≠ 0
have : {x | k N x = k'} = ⋃(m ≤ N), A m k' - ⋃m' (hmm' : m < m') (hm'N : m' ≤ N) (k ≤ N), A m' k,
{ ext, split,
{ rw [mem_set_of_eq],
assume k_eq_k',
have x_mem : x ∈ ⋃ (M : ℕ) (H : M ≤ N) (k : ℕ) (H : k ≤ N), A M k,
{ have := find_greatest_of_ne_zero k_eq_k' k'_eq_0,
simp only [mem_Union], use [M N x, nat.find_greatest_le, k', k'_le_N, this] },
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_Union, not_and, sub_eq_diff, mem_diff],
refine ⟨M N x, ⟨nat.find_greatest_le, ⟨by { rw ← k_eq_k', exact x_mem_A x_mem} , _⟩⟩⟩,
assume m hMm hmN k k_le_N,
have := nat.find_greatest_is_greatest _ m ⟨hMm, hmN⟩,
{ simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_Union, not_and] at this, exact this k k_le_N },
exact ⟨M N x, ⟨nat.find_greatest_le, x_mem_Union_k x_mem⟩⟩ },
{ simp only [mem_set_of_eq, mem_union_eq, mem_compl_eq], assume h,
have x_mem : x ∈ ⋃ (M : ℕ) (H : M ≤ N) (k : ℕ) (H : k ≤ N), A M k,
{ simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_Union, not_and, sub_eq_diff, mem_diff] at h,
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, hx, _⟩,
simp only [mem_Union], use [m, hm, k', k'_le_N, hx] },
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_Union, not_and, sub_eq_diff, mem_diff] at h,
rcases h with ⟨m, ⟨m_le_N, ⟨hx, hm⟩⟩⟩,
by_cases m_lt_M : m < M N x,
{ have := hm (M N x) m_lt_M nat.find_greatest_le (k N x) nat.find_greatest_le,
have := x_mem_A x_mem,
contradiction },
rw not_lt at m_lt_M, by_cases m_gt_M : m > M N x,
{ have := nat.find_greatest_is_greatest _ m ⟨m_gt_M, m_le_N⟩,
have : x ∈ ⋃ k ≤ N, A m k := mem_bUnion k'_le_N hx,
contradiction,
{ simp only [mem_Union], use [m, m_le_N, k', k'_le_N, hx] }},
rw not_lt at m_gt_M, have M_eq_m := le_antisymm m_lt_M m_gt_M,
exact k_unique ⟨x_mem_A x_mem, by { rw M_eq_m, exact hx }⟩ } },
-- end of `have`
rw this, simp [is_measurable.Union, is_measurable.Union_Prop, is_measurable.diff, is_measurable_A]
end,
-- start of proof
⟨λ N, ⟨F N, λ x, measurable.preimage F_measurable is_measurable_singleton, F_finite⟩,
-- The pointwise convergence part of the theorem
λ x, ⟨metric.tendsto_at_top.2 $ λ ε hε, classical.by_cases
--first case : f x = 0
( assume fx_eq_0 : f x = 0,
have x_not_mem_A' : ∀ {M k}, x ∉ A' M k := λ M k,
begin
simp only [mem_preimage, fx_eq_0, metric.mem_ball, one_div_eq_inv, norm_zero,
not_and, not_lt, add_comm, not_le, dist_zero_right, mem_diff],
assume h, rw add_comm, exact inv_pos_of_nat
end,
have x_not_mem_A : ∀ {M k}, x ∉ A M k :=
by { assume M k h, have := disjointed_subset h, exact absurd this x_not_mem_A' },
have F_eq_0 : ∀ {N}, F N x = 0 := λ N, by simp [F, if_neg, mem_Union, x_not_mem_A],
-- end of `have`
⟨0, λ n hn, show dist (F n x) (f x) < ε, by {rw [fx_eq_0, F_eq_0, dist_self], exact hε}⟩ )
--second case : f x ≠ 0
( assume fx_ne_0 : f x ≠ 0,
let ⟨N₀, hN⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt (lt_min (norm_pos_iff.2 fx_ne_0) hε) in
have norm_fx_gt : _ := (lt_min_iff.1 hN).1,
have ε_gt : _ := (lt_min_iff.1 hN).2,
have x_mem_Union_k_N₀ : x ∈ ⋃ k, A N₀ k :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := mem_closure_range_iff_nat.1 (by { rw E_dense, exact mem_univ (f x) }) N₀ in
begin
rw [Union_disjointed, mem_Union], use k,
rw [mem_preimage], simp, rw [← one_div_eq_inv],
exact ⟨hk, le_of_lt norm_fx_gt⟩
end,
let ⟨k₀, x_mem_A⟩ := mem_Union.1 x_mem_Union_k_N₀ in
let n := max N₀ k₀ in
have x_mem_Union_Union : ∀ {N} (hN : n ≤ N), x ∈ ⋃ M ≤ N, ⋃ k ≤ N, A M k := assume N hN,
mem_Union.2
⟨N₀, mem_Union.2
⟨le_trans (le_max_left _ _) hN, mem_Union.2
⟨k₀, mem_Union.2 ⟨le_trans (le_max_right _ _) hN, x_mem_A⟩⟩⟩⟩,
have FN_eq : ∀ {N} (hN : n ≤ N), F N x = e (k N x) := assume N hN, if_pos $ x_mem_Union_Union hN,
-- start of proof
⟨n, assume N hN,
have N₀_le_N : N₀ ≤ N := le_trans (le_max_left _ _) hN,
have k₀_le_N : k₀ ≤ N := le_trans (le_max_right _ _) hN,
show dist (F N x) (f x) < ε, from
calc
dist (F N x) (f x) = dist (e (k N x)) (f x) : by rw FN_eq hN
... < 1 / ((M N x : ℝ) + 1) :
begin
have := x_mem_A' (x_mem_Union_Union hN),
rw [mem_preimage, mem_diff, metric.mem_ball, dist_comm] at this, exact this.1
end
... ≤ 1 / ((N₀ : ℝ) + 1) :
@one_div_le_one_div_of_le _ _ ((N₀ : ℝ) + 1) ((M N x : ℝ) + 1) (nat.cast_add_one_pos N₀)
(add_le_add_right (nat.cast_le.2 (nat.le_find_greatest N₀_le_N (mem_bUnion k₀_le_N x_mem_A))) 1)
... < ε : ε_gt ⟩ ),
-- second part of the theorem
assume N, show ∥F N x∥ ≤ ∥f x∥ + ∥f x∥, from
classical.by_cases
( assume h : x ∈ ⋃ M ≤ N, ⋃ k ≤ N, A M k,
calc
∥F N x∥ = dist (F N x) 0 : by simp
... = dist (e (k N x)) 0 : begin simp only [F], rw if_pos h end
... ≤ dist (e (k N x)) (f x) + dist (f x) 0 : dist_triangle _ _ _
... = dist (e (k N x)) (f x) + ∥f x∥ : by simp
... ≤ 1 / ((M N x : ℝ) + 1) + ∥f x∥ :
le_of_lt $ add_lt_add_right (dist_ek_fx (x_mem_A h)) _
... ≤ ∥f x∥ + ∥f x∥ : add_le_add_right (norm_fx (x_mem_A h) ) _)
( assume h : x ∉ ⋃ M ≤ N, ⋃ k ≤ N, A M k,
have F_eq_0 : F N x = 0 := if_neg h,
by { simp only [F_eq_0, norm_zero], exact add_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _) } )⟩⟩
lemma simple_func_sequence_tendsto' {f : α → β} (hfm : measurable f)
(hfi : integrable f) : ∃ (F : ℕ → (α →ₛ β)), (∀n, integrable (F n)) ∧
tendsto (λ n, ∫⁻ x, nndist (F n x) (f x)) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
let ⟨F, hF⟩ := simple_func_sequence_tendsto hfm in
let G : ℕ → α → ennreal := λn x, nndist (F n x) (f x) in
let g : α → ennreal := λx, nnnorm (f x) + nnnorm (f x) + nnnorm (f x) in
have hF_meas : ∀ n, measurable (G n) := λ n, measurable.comp measurable_coe $
(F n).measurable.nndist hfm,
have hg_meas : measurable g := measurable.comp measurable_coe $ measurable.add
(measurable.add hfm.nnnorm hfm.nnnorm) hfm.nnnorm,
have h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ₘ x, G n x ≤ g x := λ n, all_ae_of_all $ λ x, coe_le_coe.2 $
calc
nndist (F n x) (f x) ≤ nndist (F n x) 0 + nndist 0 (f x) : nndist_triangle _ _ _
... = nnnorm (F n x) + nnnorm (f x) : by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm]
... ≤ nnnorm (f x) + nnnorm (f x) + nnnorm (f x) :
by { simp [nnreal.coe_le_coe.symm, (hF x).2, add_comm] },
have h_finite : lintegral g < ⊤ :=
calc
(∫⁻ x, nnnorm (f x) + nnnorm (f x) + nnnorm (f x)) =
(∫⁻ x, nnnorm (f x)) + (∫⁻ x, nnnorm (f x)) + (∫⁻ x, nnnorm (f x)) :
by { rw [lintegral_add, lintegral_nnnorm_add],
exacts [hfm, hfm, hfm.ennnorm.add hfm.ennnorm, hfm.ennnorm] }
... < ⊤ : by { simp only [and_self, add_lt_top], exact hfi},
have h_lim : ∀ₘ x, tendsto (λ n, G n x) at_top (𝓝 0) := all_ae_of_all $ λ x,
begin
apply (@tendsto_coe ℕ at_top (λ n, nndist (F n x) (f x)) 0).2,
apply (@nnreal.tendsto_coe ℕ at_top (λ n, nndist (F n x) (f x)) 0).1,
apply tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.1 (hF x).1
end,
begin
use F, split,
{ assume n, exact
calc
(∫⁻ a, nnnorm (F n a)) ≤ ∫⁻ a, nnnorm (f a) + nnnorm (f a) :
lintegral_mono
(by { assume a, simp only [coe_add.symm, coe_le_coe], exact (hF a).2 n })
... = (∫⁻ a, nnnorm (f a)) + (∫⁻ a, nnnorm (f a)) :
lintegral_nnnorm_add hfm hfm
... < ⊤ : by simp only [add_lt_top, and_self]; exact hfi },
convert @tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence _ _ G (λ a, 0) g
hF_meas h_bound h_finite h_lim,
simp only [lintegral_zero]
end
end measure_theory
|
dbab13ca34d779a750543bff7c7f58a9e2a75045 | a7eef317ddec01b9fc6cfbb876fe7ac00f205ac7 | /src/topology/uniform_space/uniform_embedding.lean | 87591321c36405ce7548f16025f038dd60c2f555 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kmill/mathlib | ea5a007b67ae4e9e18dd50d31d8aa60f650425ee | 1a419a9fea7b959317eddd556e1bb9639f4dcc05 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,578,197,719 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 276,482,939 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,593,637,960,000 | 1,593,637,959,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,087 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Sébastien Gouëzel, Patrick Massot
Uniform embeddings of uniform spaces. Extension of uniform continuous functions.
-/
import topology.uniform_space.cauchy
import topology.uniform_space.separation
import topology.dense_embedding
open filter topological_space set classical
open_locale classical uniformity topological_space filter
section
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
[uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] [uniform_space γ]
universe u
structure uniform_inducing (f : α → β) : Prop :=
(comap_uniformity : comap (λx:α×α, (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 β) = 𝓤 α)
lemma uniform_inducing.mk' {f : α → β} (h : ∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ x y : α, (f x, f y) ∈ t → (x, y) ∈ s) : uniform_inducing f :=
⟨by simp [eq_comm, filter.ext_iff, subset_def, h]⟩
lemma uniform_inducing.comp {g : β → γ} (hg : uniform_inducing g)
{f : α → β} (hf : uniform_inducing f) : uniform_inducing (g ∘ f) :=
⟨ by rw [show (λ (x : α × α), ((g ∘ f) x.1, (g ∘ f) x.2)) =
(λ y : β × β, (g y.1, g y.2)) ∘ (λ x : α × α, (f x.1, f x.2)), by ext ; simp,
← filter.comap_comap_comp, hg.1, hf.1]⟩
structure uniform_embedding (f : α → β) extends uniform_inducing f : Prop :=
(inj : function.injective f)
lemma uniform_embedding_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} :
uniform_embedding (subtype.val : subtype p → α) :=
{ comap_uniformity := rfl,
inj := subtype.val_injective }
lemma uniform_embedding_subtype_coe {p : α → Prop} :
uniform_embedding (coe : subtype p → α) :=
uniform_embedding_subtype_val
lemma uniform_embedding_set_inclusion {s t : set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) :
uniform_embedding (inclusion hst) :=
{ comap_uniformity :=
by { erw [uniformity_subtype, uniformity_subtype, comap_comap_comp], congr },
inj := inclusion_injective hst }
lemma uniform_embedding.comp {g : β → γ} (hg : uniform_embedding g)
{f : α → β} (hf : uniform_embedding f) : uniform_embedding (g ∘ f) :=
{ inj := hg.inj.comp hf.inj,
..hg.to_uniform_inducing.comp hf.to_uniform_inducing }
theorem uniform_embedding_def {f : α → β} :
uniform_embedding f ↔ function.injective f ∧ ∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ x y : α, (f x, f y) ∈ t → (x, y) ∈ s :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨h⟩, h'⟩,
rw [eq_comm, filter.ext_iff] at h,
simp [*, subset_def] },
{ rintro ⟨h, h'⟩,
refine uniform_embedding.mk ⟨_⟩ h,
rw [eq_comm, filter.ext_iff],
simp [*, subset_def] }
end
theorem uniform_embedding_def' {f : α → β} :
uniform_embedding f ↔ function.injective f ∧ uniform_continuous f ∧
∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤 α →
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ x y : α, (f x, f y) ∈ t → (x, y) ∈ s :=
by simp [uniform_embedding_def, uniform_continuous_def]; exact
⟨λ ⟨I, H⟩, ⟨I, λ s su, (H _).2 ⟨s, su, λ x y, id⟩, λ s, (H s).1⟩,
λ ⟨I, H₁, H₂⟩, ⟨I, λ s, ⟨H₂ s,
λ ⟨t, tu, h⟩, sets_of_superset _ (H₁ t tu) (λ ⟨a, b⟩, h a b)⟩⟩⟩
lemma uniform_inducing.uniform_continuous {f : α → β}
(hf : uniform_inducing f) : uniform_continuous f :=
by simp [uniform_continuous, hf.comap_uniformity.symm, tendsto_comap]
lemma uniform_inducing.uniform_continuous_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hg : uniform_inducing g) :
uniform_continuous f ↔ uniform_continuous (g ∘ f) :=
by simp [uniform_continuous, tendsto]; rw [← hg.comap_uniformity, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, filter.map_map]
lemma uniform_inducing.inducing {f : α → β} (h : uniform_inducing f) : inducing f :=
begin
refine ⟨eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds $ assume a, _ ⟩,
rw [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_uniformity, nhds_eq_uniformity, ← h.comap_uniformity,
comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2];
{ refl <|> exact monotone_preimage }
end
lemma uniform_inducing.prod {α' : Type*} {β' : Type*} [uniform_space α'] [uniform_space β']
{e₁ : α → α'} {e₂ : β → β'} (h₁ : uniform_inducing e₁) (h₂ : uniform_inducing e₂) :
uniform_inducing (λp:α×β, (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2)) :=
⟨by simp [(∘), uniformity_prod, h₁.comap_uniformity.symm, h₂.comap_uniformity.symm,
comap_inf, comap_comap_comp]⟩
lemma uniform_inducing.dense_inducing {f : α → β} (h : uniform_inducing f) (hd : dense_range f) :
dense_inducing f :=
{ dense := hd,
induced := h.inducing.induced }
lemma uniform_embedding.embedding {f : α → β} (h : uniform_embedding f) : embedding f :=
{ induced := h.to_uniform_inducing.inducing.induced,
inj := h.inj }
lemma uniform_embedding.dense_embedding {f : α → β} (h : uniform_embedding f) (hd : dense_range f) :
dense_embedding f :=
{ dense := hd,
inj := h.inj,
induced := h.embedding.induced }
lemma closure_image_mem_nhds_of_uniform_inducing
{s : set (α×α)} {e : α → β} (b : β)
(he₁ : uniform_inducing e) (he₂ : dense_inducing e) (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃a, closure (e '' {a' | (a, a') ∈ s}) ∈ 𝓝 b :=
have s ∈ comap (λp:α×α, (e p.1, e p.2)) (𝓤 β),
from he₁.comap_uniformity.symm ▸ hs,
let ⟨t₁, ht₁u, ht₁⟩ := this in
have ht₁ : ∀p:α×α, (e p.1, e p.2) ∈ t₁ → p ∈ s, from ht₁,
let ⟨t₂, ht₂u, ht₂s, ht₂c⟩ := comp_symm_of_uniformity ht₁u in
let ⟨t, htu, hts, htc⟩ := comp_symm_of_uniformity ht₂u in
have preimage e {b' | (b, b') ∈ t₂} ∈ comap e (𝓝 b),
from preimage_mem_comap $ mem_nhds_left b ht₂u,
let ⟨a, (ha : (b, e a) ∈ t₂)⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_sets (he₂.comap_nhds_ne_bot) this in
have ∀b' (s' : set (β × β)), (b, b') ∈ t → s' ∈ 𝓤 β →
({y : β | (b', y) ∈ s'} ∩ e '' {a' : α | (a, a') ∈ s}).nonempty,
from assume b' s' hb' hs',
have preimage e {b'' | (b', b'') ∈ s' ∩ t} ∈ comap e (𝓝 b'),
from preimage_mem_comap $ mem_nhds_left b' $ inter_mem_sets hs' htu,
let ⟨a₂, ha₂s', ha₂t⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_sets (he₂.comap_nhds_ne_bot) this in
have (e a, e a₂) ∈ t₁,
from ht₂c $ prod_mk_mem_comp_rel (ht₂s ha) $ htc $ prod_mk_mem_comp_rel hb' ha₂t,
have e a₂ ∈ {b'':β | (b', b'') ∈ s'} ∩ e '' {a' | (a, a') ∈ s},
from ⟨ha₂s', mem_image_of_mem _ $ ht₁ (a, a₂) this⟩,
⟨_, this⟩,
have ∀b', (b, b') ∈ t → 𝓝 b' ⊓ 𝓟 (e '' {a' | (a, a') ∈ s}) ≠ ⊥,
begin
intros b' hb',
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity, lift'_inf_principal_eq, lift'_ne_bot_iff],
exact assume s, this b' s hb',
exact monotone_inter monotone_preimage monotone_const
end,
have ∀b', (b, b') ∈ t → b' ∈ closure (e '' {a' | (a, a') ∈ s}),
from assume b' hb', by rw [closure_eq_cluster_pts]; exact this b' hb',
⟨a, (𝓝 b).sets_of_superset (mem_nhds_left b htu) this⟩
lemma uniform_embedding_subtype_emb (p : α → Prop) {e : α → β} (ue : uniform_embedding e)
(de : dense_embedding e) : uniform_embedding (dense_embedding.subtype_emb p e) :=
{ comap_uniformity := by simp [comap_comap_comp, (∘), dense_embedding.subtype_emb,
uniformity_subtype, ue.comap_uniformity.symm],
inj := (de.subtype p).inj }
lemma uniform_embedding.prod {α' : Type*} {β' : Type*} [uniform_space α'] [uniform_space β']
{e₁ : α → α'} {e₂ : β → β'} (h₁ : uniform_embedding e₁) (h₂ : uniform_embedding e₂) :
uniform_embedding (λp:α×β, (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2)) :=
{ inj := h₁.inj.prod h₂.inj,
..h₁.to_uniform_inducing.prod h₂.to_uniform_inducing }
lemma is_complete_of_complete_image {m : α → β} {s : set α} (hm : uniform_inducing m)
(hs : is_complete (m '' s)) : is_complete s :=
begin
intros f hf hfs,
rw le_principal_iff at hfs,
obtain ⟨_, ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, hyf⟩ : ∃ y ∈ m '' s, map m f ≤ 𝓝 y,
from hs (f.map m) (cauchy_map hm.uniform_continuous hf)
(le_principal_iff.2 (image_mem_map hfs)),
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, ← nhds_induced, ← hm.inducing.induced] at hyf,
exact ⟨x, hx, hyf⟩
end
/-- A set is complete iff its image under a uniform embedding is complete. -/
lemma is_complete_image_iff {m : α → β} {s : set α} (hm : uniform_embedding m) :
is_complete (m '' s) ↔ is_complete s :=
begin
refine ⟨is_complete_of_complete_image hm.to_uniform_inducing, λ c f hf fs, _⟩,
rw filter.le_principal_iff at fs,
let f' := comap m f,
have cf' : cauchy f',
{ have : comap m f ≠ ⊥,
{ refine comap_ne_bot (λt ht, _),
have A : t ∩ m '' s ∈ f := filter.inter_mem_sets ht fs,
obtain ⟨x, ⟨xt, ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩⟩⟩ : (t ∩ m '' s).nonempty,
from nonempty_of_mem_sets hf.1 A,
exact ⟨y, xt⟩ },
apply cauchy_comap _ hf this,
simp only [hm.comap_uniformity, le_refl] },
have : f' ≤ 𝓟 s := by simp [f']; exact
⟨m '' s, by simpa using fs, by simp [preimage_image_eq s hm.inj]⟩,
rcases c f' cf' this with ⟨x, xs, hx⟩,
existsi [m x, mem_image_of_mem m xs],
rw [(uniform_embedding.embedding hm).induced, nhds_induced] at hx,
calc f = map m f' : (map_comap $ filter.mem_sets_of_superset fs $ image_subset_range _ _).symm
... ≤ map m (comap m (𝓝 (m x))) : map_mono hx
... ≤ 𝓝 (m x) : map_comap_le
end
lemma complete_space_iff_is_complete_range {f : α → β} (hf : uniform_embedding f) :
complete_space α ↔ is_complete (range f) :=
by rw [complete_space_iff_is_complete_univ, ← is_complete_image_iff hf, image_univ]
lemma complete_space_congr {e : α ≃ β} (he : uniform_embedding e) :
complete_space α ↔ complete_space β :=
by rw [complete_space_iff_is_complete_range he, e.range_eq_univ,
complete_space_iff_is_complete_univ]
lemma complete_space_coe_iff_is_complete {s : set α} :
complete_space s ↔ is_complete s :=
(complete_space_iff_is_complete_range uniform_embedding_subtype_coe).trans $
by rw [subtype.range_coe]
lemma is_complete.complete_space_coe {s : set α} (hs : is_complete s) :
complete_space s :=
complete_space_coe_iff_is_complete.2 hs
lemma is_closed.complete_space_coe [complete_space α] {s : set α} (hs : is_closed s) :
complete_space s :=
hs.is_complete.complete_space_coe
lemma complete_space_extension {m : β → α} (hm : uniform_inducing m) (dense : dense_range m)
(h : ∀f:filter β, cauchy f → ∃x:α, map m f ≤ 𝓝 x) : complete_space α :=
⟨assume (f : filter α), assume hf : cauchy f,
let
p : set (α × α) → set α → set α := λs t, {y : α| ∃x:α, x ∈ t ∧ (x, y) ∈ s},
g := (𝓤 α).lift (λs, f.lift' (p s))
in
have mp₀ : monotone p,
from assume a b h t s ⟨x, xs, xa⟩, ⟨x, xs, h xa⟩,
have mp₁ : ∀{s}, monotone (p s),
from assume s a b h x ⟨y, ya, yxs⟩, ⟨y, h ya, yxs⟩,
have f ≤ g, from
le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, le_infi $ assume t, le_infi $ assume ht,
le_principal_iff.mpr $
mem_sets_of_superset ht $ assume x hx, ⟨x, hx, refl_mem_uniformity hs⟩,
have g ≠ ⊥, from ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.left this,
have comap m g ≠ ⊥, from comap_ne_bot $ assume t ht,
let ⟨t', ht', ht_mem⟩ := (mem_lift_sets $ monotone_lift' monotone_const mp₀).mp ht in
let ⟨t'', ht'', ht'_sub⟩ := (mem_lift'_sets mp₁).mp ht_mem in
let ⟨x, (hx : x ∈ t'')⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_sets hf.left ht'' in
have h₀ : 𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓟 (range m) ≠ ⊥,
by simpa [dense_range, closure_eq_cluster_pts] using dense x,
have h₁ : {y | (x, y) ∈ t'} ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓟 (range m),
from @mem_inf_sets_of_left α (𝓝 x) (𝓟 (range m)) _ $ mem_nhds_left x ht',
have h₂ : range m ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓟 (range m),
from @mem_inf_sets_of_right α (𝓝 x) (𝓟 (range m)) _ $ subset.refl _,
have {y | (x, y) ∈ t'} ∩ range m ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓟 (range m),
from @inter_mem_sets α (𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓟 (range m)) _ _ h₁ h₂,
let ⟨y, xyt', b, b_eq⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_sets h₀ this in
⟨b, b_eq.symm ▸ ht'_sub ⟨x, hx, xyt'⟩⟩,
have cauchy g, from
⟨‹g ≠ ⊥›, assume s hs,
let
⟨s₁, hs₁, (comp_s₁ : comp_rel s₁ s₁ ⊆ s)⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs,
⟨s₂, hs₂, (comp_s₂ : comp_rel s₂ s₂ ⊆ s₁)⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs₁,
⟨t, ht, (prod_t : set.prod t t ⊆ s₂)⟩ := mem_prod_same_iff.mp (hf.right hs₂)
in
have hg₁ : p (preimage prod.swap s₁) t ∈ g,
from mem_lift (symm_le_uniformity hs₁) $ @mem_lift' α α f _ t ht,
have hg₂ : p s₂ t ∈ g,
from mem_lift hs₂ $ @mem_lift' α α f _ t ht,
have hg : set.prod (p (preimage prod.swap s₁) t) (p s₂ t) ∈ filter.prod g g,
from @prod_mem_prod α α _ _ g g hg₁ hg₂,
(filter.prod g g).sets_of_superset hg
(assume ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨⟨c₁, c₁t, hc₁⟩, ⟨c₂, c₂t, hc₂⟩⟩,
have (c₁, c₂) ∈ set.prod t t, from ⟨c₁t, c₂t⟩,
comp_s₁ $ prod_mk_mem_comp_rel hc₁ $
comp_s₂ $ prod_mk_mem_comp_rel (prod_t this) hc₂)⟩,
have cauchy (filter.comap m g),
from cauchy_comap (le_of_eq hm.comap_uniformity) ‹cauchy g› (by assumption),
let ⟨x, (hx : map m (filter.comap m g) ≤ 𝓝 x)⟩ := h _ this in
have cluster_pt x (map m (filter.comap m g)),
from (le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy (cauchy_map hm.uniform_continuous this)).mp hx,
have cluster_pt x g,
from this.mono map_comap_le,
⟨x, calc f ≤ g : by assumption
... ≤ 𝓝 x : le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp ‹cauchy g› this⟩⟩
lemma totally_bounded_preimage {f : α → β} {s : set β} (hf : uniform_embedding f)
(hs : totally_bounded s) : totally_bounded (f ⁻¹' s) :=
λ t ht, begin
rw ← hf.comap_uniformity at ht,
rcases mem_comap_sets.2 ht with ⟨t', ht', ts⟩,
rcases totally_bounded_iff_subset.1
(totally_bounded_subset (image_preimage_subset f s) hs) _ ht' with ⟨c, cs, hfc, hct⟩,
refine ⟨f ⁻¹' c, hfc.preimage (hf.inj.inj_on _), λ x h, _⟩,
have := hct (mem_image_of_mem f h), simp at this ⊢,
rcases this with ⟨z, zc, zt⟩,
rcases cs zc with ⟨y, yc, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨y, zc, ts (by exact zt)⟩
end
end
lemma uniform_embedding_comap {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {f : α → β} [u : uniform_space β]
(hf : function.injective f) : @uniform_embedding α β (uniform_space.comap f u) u f :=
@uniform_embedding.mk _ _ (uniform_space.comap f u) _ _
(@uniform_inducing.mk _ _ (uniform_space.comap f u) _ _ rfl) hf
section uniform_extension
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
[uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] [uniform_space γ]
{e : β → α}
(h_e : uniform_inducing e)
(h_dense : dense_range e)
{f : β → γ}
(h_f : uniform_continuous f)
local notation `ψ` := (h_e.dense_inducing h_dense).extend f
lemma uniformly_extend_exists [complete_space γ] (a : α) :
∃c, tendsto f (comap e (𝓝 a)) (𝓝 c) :=
let de := (h_e.dense_inducing h_dense) in
have cauchy (𝓝 a), from cauchy_nhds,
have cauchy (comap e (𝓝 a)), from
cauchy_comap (le_of_eq h_e.comap_uniformity) this de.comap_nhds_ne_bot,
have cauchy (map f (comap e (𝓝 a))), from
cauchy_map h_f this,
complete_space.complete this
lemma uniform_extend_subtype [complete_space γ]
{p : α → Prop} {e : α → β} {f : α → γ} {b : β} {s : set α}
(hf : uniform_continuous (λx:subtype p, f x.val))
(he : uniform_embedding e) (hd : ∀x:β, x ∈ closure (range e))
(hb : closure (e '' s) ∈ 𝓝 b) (hs : is_closed s) (hp : ∀x∈s, p x) :
∃c, tendsto f (comap e (𝓝 b)) (𝓝 c) :=
have de : dense_embedding e,
from he.dense_embedding hd,
have de' : dense_embedding (dense_embedding.subtype_emb p e),
by exact de.subtype p,
have ue' : uniform_embedding (dense_embedding.subtype_emb p e),
from uniform_embedding_subtype_emb _ he de,
have b ∈ closure (e '' {x | p x}),
from (closure_mono $ monotone_image $ hp) (mem_of_nhds hb),
let ⟨c, (hc : tendsto (f ∘ subtype.val) (comap (dense_embedding.subtype_emb p e) (𝓝 ⟨b, this⟩)) (𝓝 c))⟩ :=
uniformly_extend_exists ue'.to_uniform_inducing de'.dense hf _ in
begin
rw [nhds_subtype_eq_comap] at hc,
simp [comap_comap_comp] at hc,
change (tendsto (f ∘ @subtype.val α p) (comap (e ∘ @subtype.val α p) (𝓝 b)) (𝓝 c)) at hc,
rw [←comap_comap_comp, tendsto_comap'_iff] at hc,
exact ⟨c, hc⟩,
exact ⟨_, hb, assume x,
begin
change e x ∈ (closure (e '' s)) → x ∈ range subtype.val,
rw [←closure_induced, closure_eq_cluster_pts, mem_set_of_eq, cluster_pt,
(≠), nhds_induced, ← de.to_dense_inducing.nhds_eq_comap],
change x ∈ {y | cluster_pt y (𝓟 s)} → x ∈ range subtype.val,
rw [←closure_eq_cluster_pts, hs.closure_eq],
exact assume hxs, ⟨⟨x, hp x hxs⟩, rfl⟩,
exact de.inj
end⟩
end
variables [separated_space γ]
lemma uniformly_extend_of_ind (b : β) : ψ (e b) = f b :=
dense_inducing.extend_e_eq _ b (continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 h_f.continuous b)
include h_f
lemma uniformly_extend_spec [complete_space γ] (a : α) :
tendsto f (comap e (𝓝 a)) (𝓝 (ψ a)) :=
let de := (h_e.dense_inducing h_dense) in
begin
by_cases ha : a ∈ range e,
{ rcases ha with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
rw [uniformly_extend_of_ind _ _ h_f, ← de.nhds_eq_comap],
exact h_f.continuous.tendsto _ },
{ simp only [dense_inducing.extend, dif_neg ha],
exact lim_spec (uniformly_extend_exists h_e h_dense h_f _) }
end
lemma uniform_continuous_uniformly_extend [cγ : complete_space γ] : uniform_continuous ψ :=
assume d hd,
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := (mem_lift'_sets $
monotone_comp_rel monotone_id $ monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id).mp (comp_le_uniformity3 hd) in
have h_pnt : ∀{a m}, m ∈ 𝓝 a → ∃c, c ∈ f '' preimage e m ∧ (c, ψ a) ∈ s ∧ (ψ a, c) ∈ s,
from assume a m hm,
have nb : map f (comap e (𝓝 a)) ≠ ⊥,
from map_ne_bot (h_e.dense_inducing h_dense).comap_nhds_ne_bot,
have (f '' preimage e m) ∩ ({c | (c, ψ a) ∈ s } ∩ {c | (ψ a, c) ∈ s }) ∈ map f (comap e (𝓝 a)),
from inter_mem_sets (image_mem_map $ preimage_mem_comap $ hm)
(uniformly_extend_spec h_e h_dense h_f _ (inter_mem_sets (mem_nhds_right _ hs) (mem_nhds_left _ hs))),
nonempty_of_mem_sets nb this,
have preimage (λp:β×β, (f p.1, f p.2)) s ∈ 𝓤 β,
from h_f hs,
have preimage (λp:β×β, (f p.1, f p.2)) s ∈ comap (λx:β×β, (e x.1, e x.2)) (𝓤 α),
by rwa [h_e.comap_uniformity.symm] at this,
let ⟨t, ht, ts⟩ := this in
show preimage (λp:(α×α), (ψ p.1, ψ p.2)) d ∈ 𝓤 α,
from (𝓤 α).sets_of_superset (interior_mem_uniformity ht) $
assume ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ hx_t,
have 𝓝 (x₁, x₂) ≤ 𝓟 (interior t),
from is_open_iff_nhds.mp is_open_interior (x₁, x₂) hx_t,
have interior t ∈ filter.prod (𝓝 x₁) (𝓝 x₂),
by rwa [nhds_prod_eq, le_principal_iff] at this,
let ⟨m₁, hm₁, m₂, hm₂, (hm : set.prod m₁ m₂ ⊆ interior t)⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp this in
let ⟨a, ha₁, _, ha₂⟩ := h_pnt hm₁ in
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂, _⟩ := h_pnt hm₂ in
have set.prod (preimage e m₁) (preimage e m₂) ⊆ preimage (λp:(β×β), (f p.1, f p.2)) s,
from calc _ ⊆ preimage (λp:(β×β), (e p.1, e p.2)) (interior t) : preimage_mono hm
... ⊆ preimage (λp:(β×β), (e p.1, e p.2)) t : preimage_mono interior_subset
... ⊆ preimage (λp:(β×β), (f p.1, f p.2)) s : ts,
have set.prod (f '' preimage e m₁) (f '' preimage e m₂) ⊆ s,
from calc set.prod (f '' preimage e m₁) (f '' preimage e m₂) =
(λp:(β×β), (f p.1, f p.2)) '' (set.prod (preimage e m₁) (preimage e m₂)) : prod_image_image_eq
... ⊆ (λp:(β×β), (f p.1, f p.2)) '' preimage (λp:(β×β), (f p.1, f p.2)) s : monotone_image this
... ⊆ s : image_subset_iff.mpr $ subset.refl _,
have (a, b) ∈ s, from @this (a, b) ⟨ha₁, hb₁⟩,
hs_comp $ show (ψ x₁, ψ x₂) ∈ comp_rel s (comp_rel s s),
from ⟨a, ha₂, ⟨b, this, hb₂⟩⟩
end uniform_extension
|
7c61b0cdbc34ccdd7965707d70c8304f0df98c08 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/analysis/convex/krein_milman.lean | 5f76905f4b2fcd3a9b2d9bdaf3b4ed755aa9204a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,420 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import analysis.convex.exposed
import analysis.normed_space.hahn_banach.separation
/-!
# The Krein-Milman theorem
This file proves the Krein-Milman lemma and the Krein-Milman theorem.
## The lemma
The lemma states that a nonempty compact set `s` has an extreme point. The proof goes:
1. Using Zorn's lemma, find a minimal nonempty closed `t` that is an extreme subset of `s`. We will
show that `t` is a singleton, thus corresponding to an extreme point.
2. By contradiction, `t` contains two distinct points `x` and `y`.
3. With the (geometric) Hahn-Banach theorem, find an hyperplane that separates `x` and `y`.
4. Look at the extreme (actually exposed) subset of `t` obtained by going the furthest away from
the separating hyperplane in the direction of `x`. It is nonempty, closed and an extreme subset
of `s`.
5. It is a strict subset of `t` (`y` isn't in it), so `t` isn't minimal. Absurd.
## The theorem
The theorem states that a compact convex set `s` is the closure of the convex hull of its extreme
points. It is an almost immediate strengthening of the lemma. The proof goes:
1. By contradiction, `s \ closure (convex_hull ℝ (extreme_points ℝ s))` is nonempty, say with `x`.
2. With the (geometric) Hahn-Banach theorem, find an hyperplane that separates `x` from
`closure (convex_hull ℝ (extreme_points ℝ s))`.
3. Look at the extreme (actually exposed) subset of
`s \ closure (convex_hull ℝ (extreme_points ℝ s))` obtained by going the furthest away from the
separating hyperplane. It is nonempty by assumption of nonemptiness and compactness, so by the
lemma it has an extreme point.
4. This point is also an extreme point of `s`. Absurd.
## Related theorems
When the space is finite dimensional, the `closure` can be dropped to strengthen the result of the
Krein-Milman theorem. This leads to the Minkowski-Carathéodory theorem (currently not in mathlib).
Birkhoff's theorem is the Minkowski-Carathéodory theorem applied to the set of bistochastic
matrices, permutation matrices being the extreme points.
## References
See chapter 8 of [Barry Simon, *Convexity*][simon2011]
## TODO
* Both theorems are currently stated for normed `ℝ`-spaces due to our version of geometric
Hahn-Banach. They are more generally true in a LCTVS without changes to the proofs.
-/
open set
open_locale classical
variables {E : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] {s : set E}
/-- **Krein-Milman lemma**: In a LCTVS (currently only in normed `ℝ`-spaces), any nonempty compact
set has an extreme point. -/
lemma is_compact.has_extreme_point (hscomp : is_compact s) (hsnemp : s.nonempty) :
(s.extreme_points ℝ).nonempty :=
begin
let S : set (set E) := {t | t.nonempty ∧ is_closed t ∧ is_extreme ℝ s t},
rsuffices ⟨t, ⟨⟨x, hxt⟩, htclos, hst⟩, hBmin⟩ : ∃ t ∈ S, ∀ u ∈ S, u ⊆ t → u = t,
{ refine ⟨x, mem_extreme_points_iff_extreme_singleton.2 _⟩,
rwa ←eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨hxt, λ y hyB, _⟩,
by_contra hyx,
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := geometric_hahn_banach_point_point hyx,
obtain ⟨z, hzt, hz⟩ := (compact_of_is_closed_subset hscomp htclos hst.1).exists_forall_ge
⟨x, hxt⟩ l.continuous.continuous_on,
have h : is_exposed ℝ t {z ∈ t | ∀ w ∈ t, l w ≤ l z} := λ h, ⟨l, rfl⟩,
rw ←hBmin {z ∈ t | ∀ w ∈ t, l w ≤ l z} ⟨⟨z, hzt, hz⟩, h.is_closed htclos, hst.trans
h.is_extreme⟩ (t.sep_subset _) at hyB,
exact hl.not_le (hyB.2 x hxt) },
refine zorn_superset _ (λ F hFS hF, _),
obtain rfl | hFnemp := F.eq_empty_or_nonempty,
{ exact ⟨s, ⟨hsnemp, hscomp.is_closed, is_extreme.rfl⟩, λ _, false.elim⟩ },
refine ⟨⋂₀ F, ⟨_, is_closed_sInter $ λ t ht, (hFS ht).2.1, is_extreme_sInter hFnemp $
λ t ht, (hFS ht).2.2⟩, λ t ht, sInter_subset_of_mem ht⟩,
haveI : nonempty ↥F := hFnemp.to_subtype,
rw sInter_eq_Inter,
refine is_compact.nonempty_Inter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed _ (λ t u, _)
(λ t, (hFS t.mem).1) (λ t, compact_of_is_closed_subset hscomp (hFS t.mem).2.1 (hFS t.mem).2.2.1)
(λ t, (hFS t.mem).2.1),
obtain htu | hut := hF.total t.mem u.mem,
exacts [⟨t, subset.rfl, htu⟩, ⟨u, hut, subset.rfl⟩],
end
/-- **Krein-Milman theorem**: In a LCTVS (currently only in normed `ℝ`-spaces), any compact convex
set is the closure of the convex hull of its extreme points. -/
lemma closure_convex_hull_extreme_points (hscomp : is_compact s) (hAconv : convex ℝ s) :
closure (convex_hull ℝ $ s.extreme_points ℝ) = s :=
begin
apply (closure_minimal (convex_hull_min extreme_points_subset hAconv) hscomp.is_closed).antisymm,
by_contra hs,
obtain ⟨x, hxA, hxt⟩ := not_subset.1 hs,
obtain ⟨l, r, hlr, hrx⟩ := geometric_hahn_banach_closed_point (convex_convex_hull _ _).closure
is_closed_closure hxt,
have h : is_exposed ℝ s {y ∈ s | ∀ z ∈ s, l z ≤ l y} := λ _, ⟨l, rfl⟩,
obtain ⟨z, hzA, hz⟩ := hscomp.exists_forall_ge ⟨x, hxA⟩ l.continuous.continuous_on,
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := (h.is_compact hscomp).has_extreme_point ⟨z, hzA, hz⟩,
linarith [hlr _ (subset_closure $ subset_convex_hull _ _ $
h.is_extreme.extreme_points_subset_extreme_points hy), hy.1.2 x hxA],
end
|
aa68d49df74d62272e97c307dd4a3ae31d56eca3 | a45212b1526d532e6e83c44ddca6a05795113ddc | /test/coinductive.lean | bb01ab8fc35219baf894955e3f03b4fde85dca14 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/mathlib | b21ab4068db079cbb8590b58fda9cc4bc1f35df4 | b3433a51ea8bc07c4159c1073838fc0ee9b8f227 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,791,089,608 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 165,722,980 | 5 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,552,657,455,000 | 1,547,494,646,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,079 | lean | /- test cases for coinductive predicates -/
import data.stream meta.coinductive_predicates
universe u
coinductive all_stream {α : Type u} (s : set α) : stream α → Prop
| step {} : ∀{a : α} {ω : stream α}, a ∈ s → all_stream ω → all_stream (a :: ω)
example : Π {α : Type u}, set α → stream α → Prop :=
@all_stream
example : ∀ {α : Type u} {s : set α} {a : α} {ω : stream α}, a ∈ s → all_stream s ω → all_stream s (a :: ω) :=
@all_stream.step
example : ∀ {α : Type u} (s : set α) {a : stream α}, all_stream s a → all_stream.functional s (all_stream s) a :=
@all_stream.destruct
example : ∀ {α : Type u} (s : set α) (C : stream α → Prop) {a : stream α},
C a →
(∀ (a : stream α), C a → (∃ {a_1 : α} {ω : stream α}, a_1 ∈ s ∧ C ω ∧ a_1 :: ω = a)) →
all_stream s a :=
@all_stream.corec_on
example : ∀ {α : Type u} (s : set α) (C : stream α → Prop),
(∀ (a : stream α), C a → all_stream.functional s C a) → ∀ (a : stream α), C a → all_stream s a :=
@all_stream.corec_functional
coinductive all_stream' {α : Type u} (s : set α) : stream α → Prop
| step {} : ∀{ω : stream α}, stream.head ω ∈ s → all_stream' (stream.tail ω) → all_stream' ω
coinductive alt_stream : stream bool → Prop
| tt_step : ∀{ω : stream bool}, alt_stream (ff :: ω) → alt_stream (tt :: ff :: ω)
| ff_step : ∀{ω : stream bool}, alt_stream (tt :: ω) → alt_stream (ff :: tt :: ω)
example : stream bool → Prop := @alt_stream
example : ∀ {ω : stream bool}, alt_stream (ff :: ω) → alt_stream (tt :: ff :: ω) :=
@alt_stream.tt_step
example : ∀ {ω : stream bool}, alt_stream (tt :: ω) → alt_stream (ff :: tt :: ω) :=
@alt_stream.ff_step
example : ∀ (C : stream bool → Prop),
(∀ (a : stream bool), C a → alt_stream.functional C a) → ∀ (a : stream bool), C a → alt_stream a :=
@alt_stream.corec_functional
mutual coinductive tt_stream, ff_stream
with tt_stream : stream bool → Prop
| step {} : ∀{ω : stream bool}, ff_stream ω → tt_stream (stream.cons tt ω)
with ff_stream : stream bool → Prop
| step {} : ∀{ω : stream bool}, tt_stream ω → ff_stream (stream.cons ff ω)
example : stream bool → Prop := @tt_stream
example : stream bool → Prop := @ff_stream
example : ∀ (C_tt_stream C_ff_stream : stream bool → Prop),
(∀ (a : stream bool), C_tt_stream a → tt_stream.functional C_tt_stream C_ff_stream a) →
(∀ (a : stream bool), C_ff_stream a → ff_stream.functional C_tt_stream C_ff_stream a) →
∀ (a : stream bool), C_tt_stream a → tt_stream a :=
@tt_stream.corec_functional
example : ∀ (C_tt_stream C_ff_stream : stream bool → Prop),
(∀ (a : stream bool), C_tt_stream a → tt_stream.functional C_tt_stream C_ff_stream a) →
(∀ (a : stream bool), C_ff_stream a → ff_stream.functional C_tt_stream C_ff_stream a) →
∀ (a : stream bool), C_ff_stream a → ff_stream a :=
@ff_stream.corec_functional
mutual coinductive tt_ff_stream, ff_tt_stream
with tt_ff_stream : stream bool → Prop
| step {} : ∀{ω : stream bool}, tt_ff_stream ω ∨ ff_tt_stream ω → tt_ff_stream (stream.cons tt ω)
with ff_tt_stream : stream bool → Prop
| step {} : ∀{ω : stream bool}, ff_tt_stream ω ∨ tt_ff_stream ω → ff_tt_stream (stream.cons ff ω)
inductive all_list {α : Type} (p : α → Prop) : list α → Prop
| nil : all_list []
| cons : ∀a xs, p a → all_list xs → all_list (a :: xs)
@[monotonicity]
lemma monotonicity.all_list {α : Type} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀a, implies (p a) (q a)) :
∀xs, implies (all_list p xs) (all_list q xs)
| ._ (all_list.nil ._) := all_list.nil _
| ._ (all_list.cons a xs ha hxs) := all_list.cons _ _ (h a ha) (monotonicity.all_list _ hxs)
mutual coinductive walk_a, walk_b {α β : Type} (f : α → list β) (g : β → α) (p : α → Prop) (t : α → Prop)
with walk_a : α → Prop
| step : ∀a, all_list walk_b (f a) → p a → walk_a a
| term : ∀a, t a → walk_a a
with walk_b : β → Prop
| step : ∀b, walk_a (g b) → walk_b b
example : ∀ {α β : Type} (f : α → list β) (g : β → α) (p t C_walk_a : α → Prop) (C_walk_b : β → Prop)
{a : α},
C_walk_a a →
(∀ (a : α), C_walk_a a → all_list C_walk_b (f a) ∧ p a ∨ t a) →
(∀ (a : β), C_walk_b a → C_walk_a (g a)) → walk_a f g p t a :=
@walk_a.corec_on
coinductive walk_list {α : Type} (f : α → list α) (p : α → Prop) : ℕ → α → Prop
| step : ∀n a, all_list (walk_list n) (f a) → p a → walk_list (n + 1) a
example {f : ℕ → list ℕ} {a' : ℕ} {n : ℕ} {a : fin n} : true :=
begin
suffices : walk_list f (λ a'', a'' = a') (n + 1) a', {trivial},
coinduction walk_list.corec_on generalizing a n,
show ∃ (n : ℕ),
all_list (λ (a : ℕ), ∃ {n_1 : ℕ} {a_1 : fin n_1}, n_1 + 1 = n ∧ a' = a) (f a') ∧
a' = a' ∧ n + 1 = w + 1,
admit
end
coinductive coind_foo : list ℕ → Prop
| mk : ∀ xs, (∀ k l m, coind_foo (k::l::m::xs)) → coind_foo xs
|
b5340bbfc6ef7bfe0c08023ff8db629bf0abaa60 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/run/simp_at_bug.lean | ec2c5c765ff7a47887184a5cc93fbdfe9af92113 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 137 | lean | def f (x : nat) := x
example (a b : nat) (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : a = 0) : b = f 0 :=
begin
simp [h₁] at a h₂,
simp [h₂, f]
end
|
552df9bb9f3de1a05e5d4b97cee3bea921d76281 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/algebra/ring_quot.lean | c39fc37f4c0d983ab83616ab073506340ada95d9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,500 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebra.algebra.basic
import ring_theory.ideal.basic
/-!
# Quotients of non-commutative rings
Unfortunately, ideals have only been developed in the commutative case as `ideal`,
and it's not immediately clear how one should formalise ideals in the non-commutative case.
In this file, we directly define the quotient of a semiring by any relation,
by building a bigger relation that represents the ideal generated by that relation.
We prove the universal properties of the quotient, and recommend avoiding relying on the actual
definition, which is made irreducible for this purpose.
Since everything runs in parallel for quotients of `R`-algebras, we do that case at the same time.
-/
universes u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variables {R : Type u₁} [semiring R]
variables {S : Type u₂} [comm_semiring S]
variables {A : Type u₃} [semiring A] [algebra S A]
namespace ring_quot
/--
Given an arbitrary relation `r` on a ring, we strengthen it to a relation `rel r`,
such that the equivalence relation generated by `rel r` has `x ~ y` if and only if
`x - y` is in the ideal generated by elements `a - b` such that `r a b`.
-/
inductive rel (r : R → R → Prop) : R → R → Prop
| of ⦃x y : R⦄ (h : r x y) : rel x y
| add_left ⦃a b c⦄ : rel a b → rel (a + c) (b + c)
| mul_left ⦃a b c⦄ : rel a b → rel (a * c) (b * c)
| mul_right ⦃a b c⦄ : rel b c → rel (a * b) (a * c)
theorem rel.add_right {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : rel r b c) : rel r (a + b) (a + c) :=
by { rw [add_comm a b, add_comm a c], exact rel.add_left h }
theorem rel.neg {R : Type u₁} [ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b : R⦄ (h : rel r a b) :
rel r (-a) (-b) :=
by simp only [neg_eq_neg_one_mul a, neg_eq_neg_one_mul b, rel.mul_right h]
theorem rel.sub_left {R : Type u₁} [ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : rel r a b) :
rel r (a - c) (b - c) :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.add_left]
theorem rel.sub_right {R : Type u₁} [ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : rel r b c) :
rel r (a - b) (a - c) :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.neg.add_right]
theorem rel.smul {r : A → A → Prop} (k : S) ⦃a b : A⦄ (h : rel r a b) : rel r (k • a) (k • b) :=
by simp only [algebra.smul_def, rel.mul_right h]
end ring_quot
/-- The quotient of a ring by an arbitrary relation. -/
structure ring_quot (r : R → R → Prop) :=
(to_quot : quot (ring_quot.rel r))
namespace ring_quot
variable (r : R → R → Prop)
@[irreducible] private def zero : ring_quot r := ⟨quot.mk _ 0⟩
@[irreducible] private def one : ring_quot r := ⟨quot.mk _ 1⟩
@[irreducible] private def add : ring_quot r → ring_quot r → ring_quot r
| ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ := ⟨quot.map₂ (+) rel.add_right rel.add_left a b⟩
@[irreducible] private def mul : ring_quot r → ring_quot r → ring_quot r
| ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ := ⟨quot.map₂ (*) rel.mul_right rel.mul_left a b⟩
@[irreducible] private def neg {R : Type u₁} [ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : ring_quot r → ring_quot r
| ⟨a⟩:= ⟨quot.map (λ a, -a) rel.neg a⟩
@[irreducible] private def sub {R : Type u₁} [ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) :
ring_quot r → ring_quot r → ring_quot r
| ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ := ⟨quot.map₂ has_sub.sub rel.sub_right rel.sub_left a b⟩
@[irreducible] private def smul [algebra S R] (n : S) : ring_quot r → ring_quot r
| ⟨a⟩ := ⟨quot.map (λ a, n • a) (rel.smul n) a⟩
instance : has_zero (ring_quot r) := ⟨zero r⟩
instance : has_one (ring_quot r) := ⟨one r⟩
instance : has_add (ring_quot r) := ⟨add r⟩
instance : has_mul (ring_quot r) := ⟨mul r⟩
instance {R : Type u₁} [ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : has_neg (ring_quot r) := ⟨neg r⟩
instance {R : Type u₁} [ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : has_sub (ring_quot r) := ⟨sub r⟩
instance [algebra S R] : has_scalar S (ring_quot r) := ⟨smul r⟩
lemma zero_quot : (⟨quot.mk _ 0⟩ : ring_quot r) = 0 := show _ = zero r, by rw zero
lemma one_quot : (⟨quot.mk _ 1⟩ : ring_quot r) = 1 := show _ = one r, by rw one
lemma add_quot {a b} : (⟨quot.mk _ a⟩ + ⟨quot.mk _ b⟩ : ring_quot r) = ⟨quot.mk _ (a + b)⟩ :=
by { show add r _ _ = _, rw add, refl }
lemma mul_quot {a b} : (⟨quot.mk _ a⟩ * ⟨quot.mk _ b⟩ : ring_quot r) = ⟨quot.mk _ (a * b)⟩ :=
by { show mul r _ _ = _, rw mul, refl }
lemma neg_quot {R : Type u₁} [ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) {a} :
(-⟨quot.mk _ a⟩ : ring_quot r) = ⟨quot.mk _ (-a)⟩ :=
by { show neg r _ = _, rw neg, refl }
lemma sub_quot {R : Type u₁} [ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) {a b} :
(⟨quot.mk _ a⟩ - ⟨ quot.mk _ b⟩ : ring_quot r) = ⟨quot.mk _ (a - b)⟩ :=
by { show sub r _ _ = _, rw sub, refl }
lemma smul_quot [algebra S R] {n : S} {a : R} :
(n • ⟨quot.mk _ a⟩ : ring_quot r) = ⟨quot.mk _ (n • a)⟩ :=
by { show smul r _ _ = _, rw smul, refl }
instance (r : R → R → Prop) : semiring (ring_quot r) :=
{ add := (+),
mul := (*),
zero := 0,
one := 1,
add_assoc := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [add_quot, add_assoc] },
zero_add := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [add_quot, ← zero_quot] },
add_zero := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [add_quot, ← zero_quot], },
zero_mul := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [mul_quot, ← zero_quot], },
mul_zero := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [mul_quot, ← zero_quot], },
add_comm := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [add_quot, add_comm], },
mul_assoc := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [mul_quot, mul_assoc] },
one_mul := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [mul_quot, ← one_quot] },
mul_one := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [mul_quot, ← one_quot] },
left_distrib := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [mul_quot, add_quot, left_distrib] },
right_distrib := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [mul_quot, add_quot, right_distrib] },
nsmul := (•),
nsmul_zero' := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [smul_quot, ← zero_quot] },
nsmul_succ' := by { rintros n ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [smul_quot, add_quot, add_mul, add_comm] } }
instance {R : Type u₁} [ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : ring (ring_quot r) :=
{ neg := has_neg.neg,
add_left_neg := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [neg_quot, add_quot, ← zero_quot], },
sub := has_sub.sub,
sub_eq_add_neg := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [neg_quot, sub_quot, add_quot, sub_eq_add_neg] },
.. (ring_quot.semiring r) }
instance {R : Type u₁} [comm_semiring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : comm_semiring (ring_quot r) :=
{ mul_comm := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [mul_quot, mul_comm], }
.. (ring_quot.semiring r) }
instance {R : Type u₁} [comm_ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : comm_ring (ring_quot r) :=
{ .. (ring_quot.comm_semiring r),
.. (ring_quot.ring r) }
instance (r : R → R → Prop) : inhabited (ring_quot r) := ⟨0⟩
instance [algebra S R] (r : R → R → Prop) : algebra S (ring_quot r) :=
{ smul := (•),
to_fun := λ r, ⟨quot.mk _ (algebra_map S R r)⟩,
map_one' := by simp [← one_quot],
map_mul' := by simp [mul_quot],
map_zero' := by simp [← zero_quot],
map_add' := by simp [add_quot],
commutes' := λ r, by { rintro ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, simp [algebra.commutes, mul_quot] },
smul_def' := λ r, by { rintro ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, simp [smul_quot, algebra.smul_def, mul_quot], }, }
/--
The quotient map from a ring to its quotient, as a homomorphism of rings.
-/
def mk_ring_hom (r : R → R → Prop) : R →+* ring_quot r :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨quot.mk _ x⟩,
map_one' := by simp [← one_quot],
map_mul' := by simp [mul_quot],
map_zero' := by simp [← zero_quot],
map_add' := by simp [add_quot], }
lemma mk_ring_hom_rel {r : R → R → Prop} {x y : R} (w : r x y) :
mk_ring_hom r x = mk_ring_hom r y :=
by simp [mk_ring_hom, quot.sound (rel.of w)]
lemma mk_ring_hom_surjective (r : R → R → Prop) : function.surjective (mk_ring_hom r) :=
by { dsimp [mk_ring_hom], rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp, }
@[ext]
lemma ring_quot_ext {T : Type u₄} [semiring T] {r : R → R → Prop} (f g : ring_quot r →+* T)
(w : f.comp (mk_ring_hom r) = g.comp (mk_ring_hom r)) : f = g :=
begin
ext,
rcases mk_ring_hom_surjective r x with ⟨x, rfl⟩,
exact (ring_hom.congr_fun w x : _),
end
variables {T : Type u₄} [semiring T]
/--
Any ring homomorphism `f : R →+* T` which respects a relation `r : R → R → Prop`
factors uniquely through a morphism `ring_quot r →+* T`.
-/
def lift {r : R → R → Prop} :
{f : R →+* T // ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → f x = f y} ≃ (ring_quot r →+* T) :=
{ to_fun := λ f', let f := (f' : R →+* T) in
{ to_fun := λ x, quot.lift f
begin
rintros _ _ r,
induction r,
case of : _ _ r { exact f'.prop r, },
case add_left : _ _ _ _ r' { simp [r'], },
case mul_left : _ _ _ _ r' { simp [r'], },
case mul_right : _ _ _ _ r' { simp [r'], },
end x.to_quot,
map_zero' := by simp [← zero_quot, f.map_zero],
map_add' := by { rintros ⟨⟨x⟩⟩ ⟨⟨y⟩⟩, simp [add_quot, f.map_add x y], },
map_one' := by simp [← one_quot, f.map_one],
map_mul' := by { rintros ⟨⟨x⟩⟩ ⟨⟨y⟩⟩, simp [mul_quot, f.map_mul x y] }, },
inv_fun := λ F, ⟨F.comp (mk_ring_hom r), λ x y h, by { dsimp, rw mk_ring_hom_rel h, }⟩,
left_inv := λ f, by { ext, simp, refl },
right_inv := λ F, by { ext, simp, refl } }
@[simp]
lemma lift_mk_ring_hom_apply (f : R →+* T) {r : R → R → Prop} (w : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → f x = f y) (x) :
lift ⟨f, w⟩ (mk_ring_hom r x) = f x :=
rfl
-- note this is essentially `lift.symm_apply_eq.mp h`
lemma lift_unique (f : R →+* T) {r : R → R → Prop} (w : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → f x = f y)
(g : ring_quot r →+* T) (h : g.comp (mk_ring_hom r) = f) : g = lift ⟨f, w⟩ :=
by { ext, simp [h], }
lemma eq_lift_comp_mk_ring_hom {r : R → R → Prop} (f : ring_quot r →+* T) :
f = lift ⟨f.comp (mk_ring_hom r), λ x y h, by { dsimp, rw mk_ring_hom_rel h, }⟩ :=
(lift.apply_symm_apply f).symm
section comm_ring
/-!
We now verify that in the case of a commutative ring, the `ring_quot` construction
agrees with the quotient by the appropriate ideal.
-/
variables {B : Type u₁} [comm_ring B]
/-- The universal ring homomorphism from `ring_quot r` to `(ideal.of_rel r).quotient`. -/
def ring_quot_to_ideal_quotient (r : B → B → Prop) :
ring_quot r →+* (ideal.of_rel r).quotient :=
lift
⟨ideal.quotient.mk (ideal.of_rel r),
λ x y h, quot.sound (submodule.mem_Inf.mpr (λ p w, w ⟨x, y, h, sub_add_cancel x y⟩))⟩
@[simp] lemma ring_quot_to_ideal_quotient_apply (r : B → B → Prop) (x : B) :
ring_quot_to_ideal_quotient r (mk_ring_hom r x) = ideal.quotient.mk _ x := rfl
/-- The universal ring homomorphism from `(ideal.of_rel r).quotient` to `ring_quot r`. -/
def ideal_quotient_to_ring_quot (r : B → B → Prop) :
(ideal.of_rel r).quotient →+* ring_quot r :=
ideal.quotient.lift (ideal.of_rel r) (mk_ring_hom r)
begin
refine λ x h, submodule.span_induction h _ _ _ _,
{ rintro y ⟨a, b, h, su⟩,
symmetry' at su,
rw ←sub_eq_iff_eq_add at su,
rw [ ← su, ring_hom.map_sub, mk_ring_hom_rel h, sub_self], },
{ simp, },
{ intros a b ha hb, simp [ha, hb], },
{ intros a x hx, simp [hx], },
end
@[simp] lemma ideal_quotient_to_ring_quot_apply (r : B → B → Prop) (x : B) :
ideal_quotient_to_ring_quot r (ideal.quotient.mk _ x) = mk_ring_hom r x := rfl
/--
The ring equivalence between `ring_quot r` and `(ideal.of_rel r).quotient`
-/
def ring_quot_equiv_ideal_quotient (r : B → B → Prop) :
ring_quot r ≃+* (ideal.of_rel r).quotient :=
ring_equiv.of_hom_inv (ring_quot_to_ideal_quotient r) (ideal_quotient_to_ring_quot r)
(by { ext, refl, }) (by { ext, refl, })
end comm_ring
section star_ring
variables [star_ring R] (r) (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → r (star a) (star b))
include hr
theorem rel.star ⦃a b : R⦄ (h : rel r a b) :
rel r (star a) (star b) :=
begin
induction h,
{ exact rel.of (hr _ _ h_h) },
{ rw [star_add, star_add], exact rel.add_left h_ih, },
{ rw [star_mul, star_mul], exact rel.mul_right h_ih, },
{ rw [star_mul, star_mul], exact rel.mul_left h_ih, },
end
@[irreducible] private def star' : ring_quot r → ring_quot r
| ⟨a⟩ := ⟨quot.map (star : R → R) (rel.star r hr) a⟩
lemma star'_quot (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → r (star a) (star b)) {a} :
(star' r hr ⟨quot.mk _ a⟩ : ring_quot r) = ⟨quot.mk _ (star a)⟩ :=
by { show star' r _ _ = _, rw star', refl }
/-- Transfer a star_ring instance through a quotient, if the quotient is invariant to `star` -/
def star_ring {R : Type u₁} [semiring R] [star_ring R] (r : R → R → Prop)
(hr : ∀ a b, r a b → r (star a) (star b)) :
star_ring (ring_quot r) :=
{ star := star' r hr,
star_involutive := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [star'_quot], },
star_mul := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [star'_quot, mul_quot, star_mul], },
star_add := by { rintros ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩, simp [star'_quot, add_quot, star_add], } }
end star_ring
section algebra
variables (S)
/--
The quotient map from an `S`-algebra to its quotient, as a homomorphism of `S`-algebras.
-/
def mk_alg_hom (s : A → A → Prop) : A →ₐ[S] ring_quot s :=
{ commutes' := λ r, rfl,
..mk_ring_hom s }
@[simp]
lemma mk_alg_hom_coe (s : A → A → Prop) : (mk_alg_hom S s : A →+* ring_quot s) = mk_ring_hom s :=
rfl
lemma mk_alg_hom_rel {s : A → A → Prop} {x y : A} (w : s x y) :
mk_alg_hom S s x = mk_alg_hom S s y :=
by simp [mk_alg_hom, mk_ring_hom, quot.sound (rel.of w)]
lemma mk_alg_hom_surjective (s : A → A → Prop) : function.surjective (mk_alg_hom S s) :=
by { dsimp [mk_alg_hom], rintro ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, use a, refl, }
variables {B : Type u₄} [semiring B] [algebra S B]
@[ext]
lemma ring_quot_ext' {s : A → A → Prop}
(f g : ring_quot s →ₐ[S] B) (w : f.comp (mk_alg_hom S s) = g.comp (mk_alg_hom S s)) : f = g :=
begin
ext,
rcases mk_alg_hom_surjective S s x with ⟨x, rfl⟩,
exact (alg_hom.congr_fun w x : _),
end
/--
Any `S`-algebra homomorphism `f : A →ₐ[S] B` which respects a relation `s : A → A → Prop`
factors uniquely through a morphism `ring_quot s →ₐ[S] B`.
-/
def lift_alg_hom {s : A → A → Prop} :
{ f : A →ₐ[S] B // ∀ ⦃x y⦄, s x y → f x = f y} ≃ (ring_quot s →ₐ[S] B) :=
{ to_fun := λ f', let f := (f' : A →ₐ[S] B) in
{ to_fun := λ x, quot.lift f
begin
rintros _ _ r,
induction r,
case of : _ _ r { exact f'.prop r, },
case add_left : _ _ _ _ r' { simp [r'], },
case mul_left : _ _ _ _ r' { simp [r'], },
case mul_right : _ _ _ _ r' { simp [r'], },
end x.to_quot,
map_zero' := by simp [← zero_quot, f.map_zero],
map_add' := by { rintros ⟨⟨x⟩⟩ ⟨⟨y⟩⟩, simp [add_quot, f.map_add x y] },
map_one' := by simp [← one_quot, f.map_one],
map_mul' := by { rintros ⟨⟨x⟩⟩ ⟨⟨y⟩⟩, simp [mul_quot, f.map_mul x y], },
commutes' := by { rintros x, simp [← one_quot, smul_quot, algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one] } },
inv_fun := λ F, ⟨F.comp (mk_alg_hom S s), λ _ _ h, by { dsimp, erw mk_alg_hom_rel S h }⟩,
left_inv := λ f, by { ext, simp, refl },
right_inv := λ F, by { ext, simp, refl } }
@[simp]
lemma lift_alg_hom_mk_alg_hom_apply (f : A →ₐ[S] B) {s : A → A → Prop}
(w : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, s x y → f x = f y) (x) :
(lift_alg_hom S ⟨f, w⟩) ((mk_alg_hom S s) x) = f x :=
rfl
-- note this is essentially `(lift_alg_hom S).symm_apply_eq.mp h`
lemma lift_alg_hom_unique (f : A →ₐ[S] B) {s : A → A → Prop} (w : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, s x y → f x = f y)
(g : ring_quot s →ₐ[S] B) (h : g.comp (mk_alg_hom S s) = f) : g = lift_alg_hom S ⟨f, w⟩ :=
by { ext, simp [h], }
lemma eq_lift_alg_hom_comp_mk_alg_hom {s : A → A → Prop} (f : ring_quot s →ₐ[S] B) :
f = lift_alg_hom S ⟨f.comp (mk_alg_hom S s), λ x y h, by { dsimp, erw mk_alg_hom_rel S h, }⟩ :=
((lift_alg_hom S).apply_symm_apply f).symm
end algebra
attribute [irreducible] mk_ring_hom mk_alg_hom lift lift_alg_hom
end ring_quot
|
ea3a675a01278a1b3f28e5d7558b076794ffea28 | 8d65764a9e5f0923a67fc435eb1a5a1d02fd80e3 | /src/linear_algebra/invariant_basis_number.lean | 8ec3eec53954e7e430cf4bee5049a85e94c6fe0e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | troyjlee/mathlib | e18d4b8026e32062ab9e89bc3b003a5d1cfec3f5 | 45e7eb8447555247246e3fe91c87066506c14875 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,248,035,046 | 1,629,470,528,000 | 1,629,470,528,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,380 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Scott Morrison
-/
import ring_theory.principal_ideal_domain
import ring_theory.ideal.basic
/-!
# Invariant basis number property
We say that a ring `R` satisfies the invariant basis number property if there is a well-defined
notion of the rank of a finitely generated free (left) `R`-module. Since a finitely generated free
module with a basis consisting of `n` elements is linearly equivalent to `fin n → R`, it is
sufficient that `(fin n → R) ≃ₗ[R] (fin m → R)` implies `n = m`.
It is also useful to consider two stronger conditions, namely the rank condition,
that a surjective linear map `(fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (fin m → R)` implies `m ≤ n` and
the strong rank condition, that an injective linear map `(fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (fin m → R)`
implies `n ≤ m`.
The strong rank condition implies the rank condition, and the rank condition implies
the invariant basis number property.
## Main definitions
`strong_rank_condition R` is a type class stating that `R` satisfies the strong rank condition.
`rank_condition R` is a type class stating that `R` satisfies the rank condition.
`invariant_basis_number R` is a type class stating that `R` has the invariant basis number property.
## Main results
We show that every nontrivial left-noetherian ring satisfies the strong rank condition,
(and so in particular every division ring or field),
and then use this to show every nontrivial commutative ring has the invariant basis number property.
## Future work
We can improve these results: in fact every commutative ring satisfies the strong rank condition.
So far, there is no API at all for the `invariant_basis_number` class. There are several natural
ways to formulate that a module `M` is finitely generated and free, for example
`M ≃ₗ[R] (fin n → R)`, `M ≃ₗ[R] (ι → R)`, where `ι` is a fintype, or providing a basis indexed by
a finite type. There should be lemmas applying the invariant basis number property to each
situation.
The finite version of the invariant basis number property implies the infinite analogue, i.e., that
`(ι →₀ R) ≃ₗ[R] (ι' →₀ R)` implies that `cardinal.mk ι = cardinal.mk ι'`. This fact (and its
variants) should be formalized.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invariant_basis_number
* https://mathoverflow.net/a/2574/
## Tags
free module, rank, invariant basis number, IBN
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators
open function
universes u v w
section
variables (R : Type u) [ring R]
/-- We say that `R` satisfies the strong rank condition if `(fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (fin m → R)` injective
implies `n ≤ m`. -/
class strong_rank_condition : Prop :=
(le_of_fin_injective : ∀ {n m : ℕ} (f : (fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (fin m → R)), injective f → n ≤ m)
lemma le_of_fin_injective [strong_rank_condition R] {n m : ℕ} (f : (fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (fin m → R)) :
injective f → n ≤ m :=
strong_rank_condition.le_of_fin_injective f
lemma card_le_of_injective [strong_rank_condition R] {α β : Type*} [fintype α] [fintype β]
(f : (α → R) →ₗ[R] (β → R)) (i : injective f) : fintype.card α ≤ fintype.card β :=
begin
let P := linear_equiv.fun_congr_left R R (fintype.equiv_fin α),
let Q := linear_equiv.fun_congr_left R R (fintype.equiv_fin β),
exact le_of_fin_injective R ((Q.symm.to_linear_map.comp f).comp P.to_linear_map)
(((linear_equiv.symm Q).injective.comp i).comp (linear_equiv.injective P)),
end
lemma card_le_of_injective' [strong_rank_condition R] {α β : Type*} [fintype α] [fintype β]
(f : (α →₀ R) →ₗ[R] (β →₀ R)) (i : injective f) : fintype.card α ≤ fintype.card β :=
begin
let P := (finsupp.linear_equiv_fun_on_fintype R R β),
let Q := (finsupp.linear_equiv_fun_on_fintype R R α).symm,
exact card_le_of_injective R ((P.to_linear_map.comp f).comp Q.to_linear_map)
((P.injective.comp i).comp Q.injective)
end
/-- We say that `R` satisfies the rank condition if `(fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (fin m → R)` surjective
implies `m ≤ n`. -/
class rank_condition : Prop :=
(le_of_fin_surjective : ∀ {n m : ℕ} (f : (fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (fin m → R)), surjective f → m ≤ n)
lemma le_of_fin_surjective [rank_condition R] {n m : ℕ} (f : (fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (fin m → R)) :
surjective f → m ≤ n :=
rank_condition.le_of_fin_surjective f
lemma card_le_of_surjective [rank_condition R] {α β : Type*} [fintype α] [fintype β]
(f : (α → R) →ₗ[R] (β → R)) (i : surjective f) : fintype.card β ≤ fintype.card α :=
begin
let P := linear_equiv.fun_congr_left R R (fintype.equiv_fin α),
let Q := linear_equiv.fun_congr_left R R (fintype.equiv_fin β),
exact le_of_fin_surjective R ((Q.symm.to_linear_map.comp f).comp P.to_linear_map)
(((linear_equiv.symm Q).surjective.comp i).comp (linear_equiv.surjective P)),
end
lemma card_le_of_surjective' [rank_condition R] {α β : Type*} [fintype α] [fintype β]
(f : (α →₀ R) →ₗ[R] (β →₀ R)) (i : surjective f) : fintype.card β ≤ fintype.card α :=
begin
let P := (finsupp.linear_equiv_fun_on_fintype R R β),
let Q := (finsupp.linear_equiv_fun_on_fintype R R α).symm,
exact card_le_of_surjective R ((P.to_linear_map.comp f).comp Q.to_linear_map)
((P.surjective.comp i).comp Q.surjective)
end
/--
By the universal property for free modules, any surjective map `(fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (fin m → R)`
has an injective splitting `(fin m → R) →ₗ[R] (fin n → R)`
from which the strong rank condition gives the necessary inequality for the rank condition.
-/
@[priority 100]
instance rank_condition_of_strong_rank_condition [strong_rank_condition R] : rank_condition R :=
{ le_of_fin_surjective := λ n m f s,
le_of_fin_injective R _ (f.splitting_of_fun_on_fintype_surjective_injective s), }
/-- We say that `R` has the invariant basis number property if `(fin n → R) ≃ₗ[R] (fin m → R)`
implies `n = m`. This gives rise to a well-defined notion of rank of a finitely generated free
module. -/
class invariant_basis_number : Prop :=
(eq_of_fin_equiv : ∀ {n m : ℕ}, ((fin n → R) ≃ₗ[R] (fin m → R)) → n = m)
@[priority 100]
instance invariant_basis_number_of_rank_condition [rank_condition R] : invariant_basis_number R :=
{ eq_of_fin_equiv := λ n m e, le_antisymm
(le_of_fin_surjective R e.symm.to_linear_map e.symm.surjective)
(le_of_fin_surjective R e.to_linear_map e.surjective) }
end
section
variables (R : Type u) [ring R] [invariant_basis_number R]
lemma eq_of_fin_equiv {n m : ℕ} : ((fin n → R) ≃ₗ[R] (fin m → R)) → n = m :=
invariant_basis_number.eq_of_fin_equiv
lemma card_eq_of_lequiv {α β : Type*} [fintype α] [fintype β]
(f : (α → R) ≃ₗ[R] (β → R)) : fintype.card α = fintype.card β :=
eq_of_fin_equiv R (((linear_equiv.fun_congr_left R R (fintype.equiv_fin α)).trans f).trans
((linear_equiv.fun_congr_left R R (fintype.equiv_fin β)).symm))
lemma nontrivial_of_invariant_basis_number : nontrivial R :=
begin
by_contra h,
refine zero_ne_one (eq_of_fin_equiv R _),
haveI := not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.1 h,
haveI : subsingleton (fin 1 → R) := ⟨λ a b, funext $ λ x, subsingleton.elim _ _⟩,
refine { .. }; { intros, exact 0 } <|> tidy
end
end
section
variables (R : Type u) [ring R] [nontrivial R] [is_noetherian_ring R]
/--
Any nontrivial noetherian ring satisfies the strong rank condition.
An injective map `((fin n ⊕ fin (1 + m)) → R) →ₗ[R] (fin n → R)` for some left-noetherian `R`
would force `fin (1 + m) → R ≃ₗ punit` (via `is_noetherian.equiv_punit_of_prod_injective`),
which is not the case!
-/
-- Note this includes fields,
-- and we use this below to show any commutative ring has invariant basis number.
@[priority 100]
instance noetherian_ring_strong_rank_condition : strong_rank_condition R :=
begin
fsplit,
intros m n f i,
by_contradiction h,
rw [not_le, ←nat.add_one_le_iff, le_iff_exists_add] at h,
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := h,
let e : fin (n + 1 + m) ≃ fin n ⊕ fin (1 + m) :=
(fin_congr (add_assoc _ _ _)).trans fin_sum_fin_equiv.symm,
let f' := f.comp ((linear_equiv.sum_arrow_lequiv_prod_arrow _ _ R R).symm.trans
(linear_equiv.fun_congr_left R R e)).to_linear_map,
have i' : injective f' := i.comp (linear_equiv.injective _),
apply @zero_ne_one (fin (1 + m) → R) _ _,
apply (is_noetherian.equiv_punit_of_prod_injective f' i').injective,
ext,
end
end
/-!
We want to show that nontrivial commutative rings have invariant basis number. The idea is to
take a maximal ideal `I` of `R` and use an isomorphism `R^n ≃ R^m` of `R` modules to produce an
isomorphism `(R/I)^n ≃ (R/I)^m` of `R/I`-modules, which will imply `n = m` since `R/I` is a field
and we know that fields have invariant basis number.
We construct the isomorphism in two steps:
1. We construct the ring `R^n/I^n`, show that it is an `R/I`-module and show that there is an
isomorphism of `R/I`-modules `R^n/I^n ≃ (R/I)^n`. This isomorphism is called
`ideal.pi_quot_equiv` and is located in the file `ring_theory/ideals.lean`.
2. We construct an isomorphism of `R/I`-modules `R^n/I^n ≃ R^m/I^m` using the isomorphism
`R^n ≃ R^m`.
-/
section
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] (I : ideal R) {ι : Type v} [fintype ι] {ι' : Type w}
/-- An `R`-linear map `R^n → R^m` induces a function `R^n/I^n → R^m/I^m`. -/
private def induced_map (I : ideal R) (e : (ι → R) →ₗ[R] (ι' → R)) :
(I.pi ι).quotient → (I.pi ι').quotient :=
λ x, quotient.lift_on' x (λ y, ideal.quotient.mk _ (e y))
begin
refine λ a b hab, ideal.quotient.eq.2 (λ h, _),
rw ←linear_map.map_sub,
exact ideal.map_pi _ _ hab e h,
end
/-- An isomorphism of `R`-modules `R^n ≃ R^m` induces an isomorphism of `R/I`-modules
`R^n/I^n ≃ R^m/I^m`. -/
private def induced_equiv [fintype ι'] (I : ideal R) (e : (ι → R) ≃ₗ[R] (ι' → R)) :
(I.pi ι).quotient ≃ₗ[I.quotient] (I.pi ι').quotient :=
begin
refine { to_fun := induced_map I e, inv_fun := induced_map I e.symm, .. },
all_goals { rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ <|> rintro ⟨a⟩,
change ideal.quotient.mk _ _ = ideal.quotient.mk _ _,
congr, simp }
end
end
section
local attribute [instance] ideal.quotient.field
-- TODO: in fact, any nontrivial commutative ring satisfies the strong rank condition.
-- To see this, consider `f : (fin m → R) →ₗ[R] (fin n → R)`,
-- and consider the subring `A` of `R` generated by the matrix entries.
-- That subring is noetherian, and `f` induces a new linear map `f' : (fin m → A) →ₗ[R] (fin n → A)`
-- which is injective if `f` is.
-- Since we've already established the strong rank condition for noetherian rings,
-- this gives the result.
/-- Nontrivial commutative rings have the invariant basis number property. -/
@[priority 100]
instance invariant_basis_number_of_nontrivial_of_comm_ring {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
[nontrivial R] : invariant_basis_number R :=
⟨λ n m e, let ⟨I, hI⟩ := ideal.exists_maximal R in
by exactI eq_of_fin_equiv I.quotient
((ideal.pi_quot_equiv _ _).symm.trans ((induced_equiv _ e).trans (ideal.pi_quot_equiv _ _)))⟩
end
|
eda6253fd3b5d65d722094c075cb98ee33f7cb8b | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/algebra/group/pi.lean | 56aa98e6fd1ef8b37d83ecdaf745bef6fd431718 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,603 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Patrick Massot
-/
import data.pi
import data.set.function
import tactic.pi_instances
import algebra.group.hom_instances
/-!
# Pi instances for groups and monoids
This file defines instances for group, monoid, semigroup and related structures on Pi types.
-/
universes u v w
variable {I : Type u} -- The indexing type
variable {f : I → Type v} -- The family of types already equipped with instances
variables (x y : Π i, f i) (i : I)
namespace pi
@[to_additive]
instance semigroup [∀ i, semigroup $ f i] : semigroup (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { mul := (*), .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance semigroup_with_zero [∀ i, semigroup_with_zero $ f i] :
semigroup_with_zero (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive]
instance comm_semigroup [∀ i, comm_semigroup $ f i] : comm_semigroup (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { mul := (*), .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive]
instance mul_one_class [∀ i, mul_one_class $ f i] : mul_one_class (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive]
instance monoid [∀ i, monoid $ f i] : monoid (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), npow := λ n x i, npow n (x i) };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[simp]
lemma pow_apply [∀ i, monoid $ f i] (n : ℕ) : (x^n) i = (x i)^n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ simp, },
{ simp [pow_succ, ih], },
end
@[to_additive]
instance comm_monoid [∀ i, comm_monoid $ f i] : comm_monoid (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), npow := λ n x i, npow n (x i) };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive]
instance div_inv_monoid [∀ i, div_inv_monoid $ f i] :
div_inv_monoid (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), inv := has_inv.inv, div := has_div.div,
npow := npow, gpow := λ z x i, gpow z (x i) }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive]
instance group [∀ i, group $ f i] : group (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), inv := has_inv.inv, div := has_div.div,
npow := npow, gpow := gpow }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive]
instance comm_group [∀ i, comm_group $ f i] : comm_group (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), inv := has_inv.inv, div := has_div.div,
npow := npow, gpow := gpow }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive add_left_cancel_semigroup]
instance left_cancel_semigroup [∀ i, left_cancel_semigroup $ f i] :
left_cancel_semigroup (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { mul := (*) }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive add_right_cancel_semigroup]
instance right_cancel_semigroup [∀ i, right_cancel_semigroup $ f i] :
right_cancel_semigroup (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { mul := (*) }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive add_left_cancel_monoid]
instance left_cancel_monoid [∀ i, left_cancel_monoid $ f i] :
left_cancel_monoid (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), npow := npow };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive add_right_cancel_monoid]
instance right_cancel_monoid [∀ i, right_cancel_monoid $ f i] :
right_cancel_monoid (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), npow := npow, .. };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive add_cancel_monoid]
instance cancel_monoid [∀ i, cancel_monoid $ f i] :
cancel_monoid (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), npow := npow };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive add_cancel_comm_monoid]
instance cancel_comm_monoid [∀ i, cancel_comm_monoid $ f i] :
cancel_comm_monoid (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), npow := npow };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance mul_zero_class [∀ i, mul_zero_class $ f i] :
mul_zero_class (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance mul_zero_one_class [∀ i, mul_zero_one_class $ f i] :
mul_zero_one_class (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : Π i, f i), one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*), .. };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance monoid_with_zero [∀ i, monoid_with_zero $ f i] :
monoid_with_zero (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : Π i, f i), one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*),
npow := npow }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance comm_monoid_with_zero [∀ i, comm_monoid_with_zero $ f i] :
comm_monoid_with_zero (Π i : I, f i) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : Π i, f i), one := (1 : Π i, f i), mul := (*),
npow := npow }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
section instance_lemmas
open function
variables {α β γ : Type*}
@[simp, to_additive] lemma const_one [has_one β] : const α (1 : β) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma comp_one [has_one β] {f : β → γ} : f ∘ 1 = const α (f 1) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma one_comp [has_one γ] {f : α → β} : (1 : β → γ) ∘ f = 1 := rfl
end instance_lemmas
end pi
section monoid_hom
variables (f) [Π i, mul_one_class (f i)]
/-- Evaluation of functions into an indexed collection of monoids at a point is a monoid
homomorphism.
This is `function.eval i` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[to_additive "Evaluation of functions into an indexed collection of additive monoids at a
point is an additive monoid homomorphism.
This is `function.eval i` as an `add_monoid_hom`.", simps]
def pi.eval_monoid_hom (i : I) : (Π i, f i) →* f i :=
{ to_fun := λ g, g i,
map_one' := pi.one_apply i,
map_mul' := λ x y, pi.mul_apply _ _ i, }
/-- `function.const` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[to_additive "`function.const` as an `add_monoid_hom`.", simps]
def pi.const_monoid_hom (α β : Type*) [mul_one_class β] : β →* (α → β) :=
{ to_fun := function.const α,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ _ _, rfl }
/-- Coercion of a `monoid_hom` into a function is itself a `monoid_hom`.
See also `monoid_hom.eval`. -/
@[to_additive "Coercion of an `add_monoid_hom` into a function is itself a `add_monoid_hom`.
See also `add_monoid_hom.eval`. ", simps]
def monoid_hom.coe_fn (α β : Type*) [mul_one_class α] [comm_monoid β] : (α →* β) →* (α → β) :=
{ to_fun := λ g, g,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ x y, rfl, }
/-- Monoid homomorphism between the function spaces `I → α` and `I → β`, induced by a monoid
homomorphism `f` between `α` and `β`. -/
@[to_additive "Additive monoid homomorphism between the function spaces `I → α` and `I → β`,
induced by an additive monoid homomorphism `f` between `α` and `β`", simps]
protected def monoid_hom.comp_left {α β : Type*} [mul_one_class α] [mul_one_class β] (f : α →* β)
(I : Type*) :
(I → α) →* (I → β) :=
{ to_fun := λ h, f ∘ h,
map_one' := by ext; simp,
map_mul' := λ _ _, by ext; simp }
end monoid_hom
section single
variables [decidable_eq I]
open pi
variables (f)
/-- The zero-preserving homomorphism including a single value
into a dependent family of values, as functions supported at a point.
This is the `zero_hom` version of `pi.single`. -/
@[simps] def zero_hom.single [Π i, has_zero $ f i] (i : I) : zero_hom (f i) (Π i, f i) :=
{ to_fun := single i,
map_zero' := single_zero i }
/-- The additive monoid homomorphism including a single additive monoid
into a dependent family of additive monoids, as functions supported at a point.
This is the `add_monoid_hom` version of `pi.single`. -/
@[simps] def add_monoid_hom.single [Π i, add_zero_class $ f i] (i : I) : f i →+ Π i, f i :=
{ to_fun := single i,
map_add' := single_op₂ (λ _, (+)) (λ _, zero_add _) _,
.. (zero_hom.single f i) }
/-- The multiplicative homomorphism including a single `mul_zero_class`
into a dependent family of `mul_zero_class`es, as functions supported at a point.
This is the `mul_hom` version of `pi.single`. -/
@[simps] def mul_hom.single [Π i, mul_zero_class $ f i] (i : I) : mul_hom (f i) (Π i, f i) :=
{ to_fun := single i,
map_mul' := single_op₂ (λ _, (*)) (λ _, zero_mul _) _, }
variables {f}
lemma pi.single_add [Π i, add_zero_class $ f i] (i : I) (x y : f i) :
single i (x + y) = single i x + single i y :=
(add_monoid_hom.single f i).map_add x y
lemma pi.single_neg [Π i, add_group $ f i] (i : I) (x : f i) :
single i (-x) = -single i x :=
(add_monoid_hom.single f i).map_neg x
lemma pi.single_sub [Π i, add_group $ f i] (i : I) (x y : f i) :
single i (x - y) = single i x - single i y :=
(add_monoid_hom.single f i).map_sub x y
lemma pi.single_mul [Π i, mul_zero_class $ f i] (i : I) (x y : f i) :
single i (x * y) = single i x * single i y :=
(mul_hom.single f i).map_mul x y
lemma pi.update_eq_sub_add_single [Π i, add_group $ f i] (g : Π (i : I), f i) (x : f i) :
function.update g i x = g - single i (g i) + single i x :=
begin
ext j,
rcases eq_or_ne i j with rfl|h,
{ simp },
{ simp [function.update_noteq h.symm, h] }
end
end single
section piecewise
@[to_additive]
lemma set.piecewise_mul [Π i, has_mul (f i)] (s : set I) [Π i, decidable (i ∈ s)]
(f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : Π i, f i) :
s.piecewise (f₁ * f₂) (g₁ * g₂) = s.piecewise f₁ g₁ * s.piecewise f₂ g₂ :=
s.piecewise_op₂ _ _ _ _ (λ _, (*))
@[to_additive]
lemma pi.piecewise_inv [Π i, has_inv (f i)] (s : set I) [Π i, decidable (i ∈ s)]
(f₁ g₁ : Π i, f i) :
s.piecewise (f₁⁻¹) (g₁⁻¹) = (s.piecewise f₁ g₁)⁻¹ :=
s.piecewise_op f₁ g₁ (λ _ x, x⁻¹)
@[to_additive]
lemma pi.piecewise_div [Π i, has_div (f i)] (s : set I) [Π i, decidable (i ∈ s)]
(f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : Π i, f i) :
s.piecewise (f₁ / f₂) (g₁ / g₂) = s.piecewise f₁ g₁ / s.piecewise f₂ g₂ :=
s.piecewise_op₂ _ _ _ _ (λ _, (/))
end piecewise
section extend
variables {ι : Type u} {η : Type v} (R : Type w) (s : ι → η)
/-- `function.extend s f 1` as a bundled hom. -/
@[to_additive function.extend_by_zero.hom "`function.extend s f 0` as a bundled hom.", simps]
noncomputable def function.extend_by_one.hom [mul_one_class R] : (ι → R) →* (η → R) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, function.extend s f 1,
map_one' := function.extend_one s,
map_mul' := λ f g, by { simpa using function.extend_mul s f g 1 1 } }
end extend
|
7c6a2ae126b80c7e6d1809cd2d3707ed98d5ae03 | 15457aa8f007f15bd4343ddc208925e54b867944 | /src/b.lean | cc028e1007dcb4a954dfc4c12a0b2294ce4c92b0 | [] | no_license | alexjbest/pole-test | d7c599f96fbf879abd6ac562c55a46036f743c9d | a8458dea5dfa337d85bf50c4698eae668759a487 | refs/heads/master | 1,691,966,250,606 | 1,632,236,826,000 | 1,632,236,826,000 | 408,866,643 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,680 | lean | import a
lemma aa : true :=
begin
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 300 + 1 = 6001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
trivial,
end
lemma ab : true :=
begin
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 300 + 1 = 6001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
have : 20 * 200 + 1 = 4001 := rfl,
trivial,
end
|
b20b6ecb23b2d22db4d4f3436d8f6947b96839a5 | 957a80ea22c5abb4f4670b250d55534d9db99108 | /tests/lean/utf8.lean | 5a6c7fbd5aa67d2789496c0455f630bb04772abf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean | aa1e64d604051e602fcf4610061314b9a37ab8cd | f1ec117a24459b59c6ff9e56a1d09d9e9e60a6c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,202,909,807 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 75,319,626 | 2 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,539,290,164,000 | 1,480,616,104,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 250 | lean | --open list
#eval "α₁".length
#eval "α₁ → β₁".length
#eval "∀ α : nat → nat, α 0 ≥ 0".length
#print "------------"
#eval "α₁".utf8_length
#eval "α₁ → β₁".utf8_length
#eval "∀ α : nat → nat, α 0 ≥ 0".utf8_length
|
aca1779913934f015c623f41289da331cb7128c9 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean | 7d88f847c567f4b9c8da2fb3a7b48b4ea90a5436 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,286 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.analytic.basic
/-!
# Linear functions are analytic
In this file we prove that a `continuous_linear_map` defines an analytic function with
the formal power series `f x = f a + f (x - a)`.
-/
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
{G : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G]
open_locale topological_space classical big_operators nnreal ennreal
open set filter asymptotics
noncomputable theory
namespace continuous_linear_map
/-- Formal power series of a continuous linear map `f : E →L[𝕜] F` at `x : E`:
`f y = f x + f (y - x)`. -/
@[simp] def fpower_series (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F
| 0 := continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 _ (f x)
| 1 := (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F).symm f
| _ := 0
@[simp] lemma fpower_series_apply_add_two (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (n : ℕ) :
f.fpower_series x (n + 2) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma fpower_series_radius (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) : (f.fpower_series x).radius = ∞ :=
(f.fpower_series x).radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero 2 $ λ n, rfl
protected theorem has_fpower_series_on_ball (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
has_fpower_series_on_ball f (f.fpower_series x) x ∞ :=
{ r_le := by simp,
r_pos := ennreal.coe_lt_top,
has_sum := λ y _, (has_sum_nat_add_iff' 2).1 $
by simp [finset.sum_range_succ, ← sub_sub, has_sum_zero] }
protected theorem has_fpower_series_at (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
has_fpower_series_at f (f.fpower_series x) x :=
⟨∞, f.has_fpower_series_on_ball x⟩
protected theorem analytic_at (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) : analytic_at 𝕜 f x :=
(f.has_fpower_series_at x).analytic_at
/-- Reinterpret a bilinear map `f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G` as a multilinear map
`(E × F) [×2]→L[𝕜] G`. This multilinear map is the second term in the formal
multilinear series expansion of `uncurry f`. It is given by
`f.uncurry_bilinear ![(x, y), (x', y')] = f x y'`. -/
def uncurry_bilinear (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) : (E × F) [×2]→L[𝕜] G :=
@continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left 𝕜 1 (λ _, E × F) G _ _ _ _ _ $
(↑(continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 (E × F) G).symm : (E × F →L[𝕜] G) →L[𝕜] _).comp $
f.bilinear_comp (fst _ _ _) (snd _ _ _)
@[simp] lemma uncurry_bilinear_apply (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (m : fin 2 → E × F) :
f.uncurry_bilinear m = f (m 0).1 (m 1).2 :=
rfl
/-- Formal multilinear series expansion of a bilinear function `f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G`. -/
@[simp] def fpower_series_bilinear (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (x : E × F) :
formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 (E × F) G
| 0 := continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 _ (f x.1 x.2)
| 1 := (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 (E × F) G).symm (f.deriv₂ x)
| 2 := f.uncurry_bilinear
| _ := 0
@[simp] lemma fpower_series_bilinear_radius (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (x : E × F) :
(f.fpower_series_bilinear x).radius = ∞ :=
(f.fpower_series_bilinear x).radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero 3 $ λ n, rfl
protected theorem has_fpower_series_on_ball_bilinear (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (x : E × F) :
has_fpower_series_on_ball (λ x : E × F, f x.1 x.2) (f.fpower_series_bilinear x) x ∞ :=
{ r_le := by simp,
r_pos := ennreal.coe_lt_top,
has_sum := λ y _, (has_sum_nat_add_iff' 3).1 $
begin
simp only [finset.sum_range_succ, finset.sum_range_one, prod.fst_add, prod.snd_add,
f.map_add_add],
dsimp, simp only [add_comm, sub_self, has_sum_zero]
end }
protected theorem has_fpower_series_at_bilinear (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (x : E × F) :
has_fpower_series_at (λ x : E × F, f x.1 x.2) (f.fpower_series_bilinear x) x :=
⟨∞, f.has_fpower_series_on_ball_bilinear x⟩
protected theorem analytic_at_bilinear (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (x : E × F) :
analytic_at 𝕜 (λ x : E × F, f x.1 x.2) x :=
(f.has_fpower_series_at_bilinear x).analytic_at
end continuous_linear_map
|
dc00dd25014d7d37964a5f434464e7e8755713d5 | d9d511f37a523cd7659d6f573f990e2a0af93c6f | /src/topology/subset_properties.lean | 21ad621a00736a9e328123805bd6604429863820 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hikari0108/mathlib | b7ea2b7350497ab1a0b87a09d093ecc025a50dfa | a9e7d333b0cfd45f13a20f7b96b7d52e19fa2901 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,483,608,260 | 1,631,541,580,000 | 1,631,541,580,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 66,677 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import topology.bases
import data.finset.order
import data.set.accumulate
/-!
# Properties of subsets of topological spaces
In this file we define various properties of subsets of a topological space, and some classes on
topological spaces.
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `is_compact`: each open cover has a finite subcover. This is defined in mathlib using filters.
The main property of a compact set is `is_compact.elim_finite_subcover`.
* `is_clopen`: a set that is both open and closed.
* `is_irreducible`: a nonempty set that has contains no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens.
See also the section below in the module doc.
For each of these definitions (except for `is_clopen`), we also have a class stating that the whole
space satisfies that property:
`compact_space`, `irreducible_space`
Furthermore, we have two more classes:
* `locally_compact_space`: for every point `x`, every open neighborhood of `x` contains a compact
neighborhood of `x`. The definition is formulated in terms of the neighborhood filter.
* `sigma_compact_space`: a space that is the union of a countably many compact subspaces.
## On the definition of irreducible and connected sets/spaces
In informal mathematics, irreducible spaces are assumed to be nonempty.
We formalise the predicate without that assumption as `is_preirreducible`.
In other words, the only difference is whether the empty space counts as irreducible.
There are good reasons to consider the empty space to be “too simple to be simple”
See also https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple,
and in particular
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple#relationship_to_biased_definitions.
-/
open set filter classical topological_space
open_locale classical topological_space filter
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [topological_space α] {s t : set α}
/- compact sets -/
section compact
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every nontrivial filter `f` that contains `s`,
there exists `a ∈ s` such that every set of `f` meets every neighborhood of `a`. -/
def is_compact (s : set α) := ∀ ⦃f⦄ [ne_bot f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃a∈s, cluster_pt a f
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if it belongs to each filter
`𝓝 a ⊓ f`, `a ∈ s`. -/
lemma is_compact.compl_mem_sets (hs : is_compact s) {f : filter α} (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 a ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f :=
begin
contrapose! hf,
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc, ← exists_prop] at hf ⊢,
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
end
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if each `a ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t`
within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
lemma is_compact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhds_within (hs : is_compact s) {f : filter α}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a, tᶜ ∈ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f :=
begin
refine hs.compl_mem_sets (λ a ha, _),
rcases hf a ha with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩,
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht,
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst,
rintros x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs,
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
end
/-- If `p : set α → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a compact set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma is_compact.induction_on {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) {p : set α → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) :
p s :=
let f : filter α :=
{ sets := {t | p tᶜ},
univ_sets := by simpa,
sets_of_superset := λ t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht, hmono (compl_subset_compl.2 ht) ht₁,
inter_sets := λ t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂, by simp [compl_inter, hunion ht₁ ht₂] } in
have sᶜ ∈ f, from hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhds_within (by simpa using hnhds),
by simpa
/-- The intersection of a compact set and a closed set is a compact set. -/
lemma is_compact.inter_right (hs : is_compact s) (ht : is_closed t) :
is_compact (s ∩ t) :=
begin
introsI f hnf hstf,
obtain ⟨a, hsa, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ s, cluster_pt a f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_left _ _))),
have : a ∈ t :=
(ht.mem_of_nhds_within_ne_bot $ ha.mono $
le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_right _ _))),
exact ⟨a, ⟨hsa, this⟩, ha⟩
end
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a compact set is a compact set. -/
lemma is_compact.inter_left (ht : is_compact t) (hs : is_closed s) : is_compact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a compact set and an open set is a compact set. -/
lemma is_compact.diff (hs : is_compact s) (ht : is_open t) : is_compact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (is_closed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a compact set is a compact set. -/
lemma compact_of_is_closed_subset (hs : is_compact s) (ht : is_closed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
is_compact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
lemma is_compact.adherence_nhdset {f : filter α}
(hs : is_compact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : is_open t) (ht₂ : ∀a∈s, cluster_pt a f → a ∈ t) :
t ∈ f :=
classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot $
assume : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥,
let ⟨a, ha, (hfa : cluster_pt a $ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @@hs ⟨this⟩ $ inf_le_of_left_le hf₂ in
have a ∈ t,
from ht₂ a ha (hfa.of_inf_left),
have tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] a,
from inter_mem_nhds_within _ (is_open.mem_nhds ht₁ this),
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] a = ⊥,
from empty_mem_iff_bot.1 $ compl_inter_self t ▸ this,
have 𝓝[tᶜ] a ≠ ⊥,
from hfa.of_inf_right.ne,
absurd A this
lemma is_compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
is_compact s ↔ (∀f : ultrafilter α, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃a∈s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 a) :=
begin
refine (forall_ne_bot_le_iff _).trans _,
{ rintro f g hle ⟨a, has, haf⟩,
exact ⟨a, has, haf.mono hle⟩ },
{ simp only [ultrafilter.cluster_pt_iff] }
end
alias is_compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds ↔ is_compact.ultrafilter_le_nhds _
/-- For every open directed cover of a compact set, there exists a single element of the
cover which itself includes the set. -/
lemma is_compact.elim_directed_cover {ι : Type v} [hι : nonempty ι] (hs : is_compact s)
(U : ι → set α) (hUo : ∀i, is_open (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) (hdU : directed (⊆) U) :
∃ i, s ⊆ U i :=
hι.elim $ λ i₀, is_compact.induction_on hs ⟨i₀, empty_subset _⟩
(λ s₁ s₂ hs ⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨i, subset.trans hs hi⟩)
(λ s₁ s₂ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩, let ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩ := hdU i j in
⟨k, union_subset (subset.trans hi hki) (subset.trans hj hkj)⟩)
(λ x hx, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_Union.1 (hsU hx) in
⟨U i, mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds (is_open.mem_nhds (hUo i) hi), i, subset.refl _⟩)
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
lemma is_compact.elim_finite_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : is_compact s)
(U : ι → set α) (hUo : ∀i, is_open (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ t : finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
hs.elim_directed_cover _ (λ t, is_open_bUnion $ λ i _, hUo i) (Union_eq_Union_finset U ▸ hsU)
(directed_of_sup $ λ t₁ t₂ h, bUnion_subset_bUnion_left h)
lemma is_compact.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : is_compact s) (U : Π x ∈ s, set α)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 :=
(hs.elim_finite_subcover (λ x : s, interior (U x x.2)) (λ x, is_open_interior)
(λ x hx, mem_Union.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 $ hU _ _⟩)).imp $ λ t ht,
subset.trans ht $ bUnion_subset_bUnion_right $ λ _ _, interior_subset
lemma is_compact.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : is_compact s) (U : α → set α) (hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : finset α, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (λ x _, U x) hU
in ⟨t.image coe, λ x hx, let ⟨y, hyt, hyx⟩ := finset.mem_image.1 hx in hyx ▸ y.2,
by rwa finset.set_bUnion_finset_image⟩
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids this compact set. -/
lemma is_compact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {s : set α} {ι : Type v} (hs : is_compact s)
(Z : ι → set α) (hZc : ∀i, is_closed (Z i)) (hsZ : s ∩ (⋂ i, Z i) = ∅) :
∃ t : finset ι, s ∩ (⋂ i ∈ t, Z i) = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_finite_subcover (λ i, (Z i)ᶜ) (λ i, (hZc i).is_open_compl)
(by simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_Union,
exists_prop, mem_inter_eq, not_and, iff_self, mem_Inter, mem_compl_eq] using hsZ)
in
⟨t, by simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_Union,
exists_prop, mem_inter_eq, not_and, iff_self, mem_Inter, mem_compl_eq] using ht⟩
/-- If `s` is a compact set in a topological space `α` and `f : ι → set α` is a locally finite
family of sets, then `f i ∩ s` is nonempty only for a finitely many `i`. -/
lemma locally_finite.finite_nonempty_inter_compact {ι : Type*} {f : ι → set α}
(hf : locally_finite f) {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) :
finite {i | (f i ∩ s).nonempty} :=
begin
choose U hxU hUf using hf,
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U (λ x _, hxU x) with ⟨t, -, hsU⟩,
refine (t.finite_to_set.bUnion (λ x _, hUf x)).subset _,
rintro i ⟨x, hx⟩,
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 (hsU hx.2) with ⟨c, hct, hcx⟩,
exact mem_bUnion hct ⟨x, hx.1, hcx⟩
end
/-- To show that a compact set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every finite subfamily. -/
lemma is_compact.inter_Inter_nonempty {s : set α} {ι : Type v} (hs : is_compact s)
(Z : ι → set α) (hZc : ∀i, is_closed (Z i)) (hsZ : ∀ t : finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ t, Z i).nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, Z i).nonempty :=
begin
simp only [← ne_empty_iff_nonempty] at hsZ ⊢,
apply mt (hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed Z hZc), push_neg, exact hsZ
end
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
lemma is_compact.nonempty_Inter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed
{ι : Type v} [hι : nonempty ι] (Z : ι → set α) (hZd : directed (⊇) Z)
(hZn : ∀ i, (Z i).nonempty) (hZc : ∀ i, is_compact (Z i)) (hZcl : ∀ i, is_closed (Z i)) :
(⋂ i, Z i).nonempty :=
begin
apply hι.elim,
intro i₀,
let Z' := λ i, Z i ∩ Z i₀,
suffices : (⋂ i, Z' i).nonempty,
{ exact nonempty.mono (Inter_subset_Inter $ assume i, inter_subset_left (Z i) (Z i₀)) this },
rw ← ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
intro H,
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ : ∃ (t : finset ι), ((Z i₀) ∩ ⋂ (i ∈ t), Z' i) = ∅,
from (hZc i₀).elim_finite_subfamily_closed Z'
(assume i, is_closed.inter (hZcl i) (hZcl i₀)) (by rw [H, inter_empty]),
obtain ⟨i₁, hi₁⟩ : ∃ i₁ : ι, Z i₁ ⊆ Z i₀ ∧ ∀ i ∈ t, Z i₁ ⊆ Z' i,
{ rcases directed.finset_le hZd t with ⟨i, hi⟩,
rcases hZd i i₀ with ⟨i₁, hi₁, hi₁₀⟩,
use [i₁, hi₁₀],
intros j hj,
exact subset_inter (subset.trans hi₁ (hi j hj)) hi₁₀ },
suffices : ((Z i₀) ∩ ⋂ (i ∈ t), Z' i).nonempty,
{ rw ← ne_empty_iff_nonempty at this, contradiction },
refine nonempty.mono _ (hZn i₁),
exact subset_inter hi₁.left (subset_bInter hi₁.right)
end
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for sequences indexed by `ℕ`:
the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
lemma is_compact.nonempty_Inter_of_sequence_nonempty_compact_closed
(Z : ℕ → set α) (hZd : ∀ i, Z (i+1) ⊆ Z i)
(hZn : ∀ i, (Z i).nonempty) (hZ0 : is_compact (Z 0)) (hZcl : ∀ i, is_closed (Z i)) :
(⋂ i, Z i).nonempty :=
have Zmono : _, from @monotone_nat_of_le_succ (order_dual _) _ Z hZd,
have hZd : directed (⊇) Z, from directed_of_sup Zmono,
have ∀ i, Z i ⊆ Z 0, from assume i, Zmono $ zero_le i,
have hZc : ∀ i, is_compact (Z i), from assume i, compact_of_is_closed_subset hZ0 (hZcl i) (this i),
is_compact.nonempty_Inter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed Z hZd hZn hZc hZcl
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
lemma is_compact.elim_finite_subcover_image {b : set β} {c : β → set α}
(hs : is_compact s) (hc₁ : ∀i∈b, is_open (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃i∈b, c i) :
∃b'⊆b, finite b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃i∈b', c i :=
begin
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (λ i, c i : b → set α) _ _ with ⟨d, hd⟩;
[skip, simpa using hc₁, simpa using hc₂],
refine ⟨↑(d.image coe), _, finset.finite_to_set _, _⟩,
{ simp },
{ rwa [finset.coe_image, bUnion_image] }
end
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem is_compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed
(h : Π {ι : Type u} (Z : ι → (set α)), (∀ i, is_closed (Z i)) →
s ∩ (⋂ i, Z i) = ∅ → (∃ (t : finset ι), s ∩ (⋂ i ∈ t, Z i) = ∅)) :
is_compact s :=
assume f hfn hfs, classical.by_contradiction $ assume : ¬ (∃x∈s, cluster_pt x f),
have hf : ∀x∈s, 𝓝 x ⊓ f = ⊥,
by simpa only [cluster_pt, not_exists, not_not, ne_bot_iff],
have ¬ ∃x∈s, ∀t∈f.sets, x ∈ closure t,
from assume ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩,
have ∅ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f, by rw [empty_mem_iff_bot, hf x hxs],
let ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, ht⟩ := by rw [mem_inf_iff] at this; exact this in
have ∅ ∈ 𝓝[t₂] x,
by { rw [ht, inter_comm], exact inter_mem_nhds_within _ ht₁ },
have 𝓝[t₂] x = ⊥,
by rwa [empty_mem_iff_bot] at this,
by simp only [closure_eq_cluster_pts] at hx; exact (hx t₂ ht₂).ne this,
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := h (λ i : f.sets, closure i.1) (λ i, is_closed_closure)
(by simpa [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, not_exists]) in
have (⋂i∈t, subtype.val i) ∈ f,
from t.Inter_mem_sets.2 $ assume i hi, i.2,
have s ∩ (⋂i∈t, subtype.val i) ∈ f,
from inter_mem (le_principal_iff.1 hfs) this,
have ∅ ∈ f,
from mem_of_superset this $ assume x ⟨hxs, hx⟩,
let ⟨i, hit, hxi⟩ := (show ∃i ∈ t, x ∉ closure (subtype.val i),
by { rw [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem] at ht, simpa [hxs, not_forall] using ht x }) in
have x ∈ closure i.val, from subset_closure (mem_bInter_iff.mp hx i hit),
show false, from hxi this,
hfn.ne $ by rwa [empty_mem_iff_bot] at this
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
lemma is_compact_of_finite_subcover
(h : Π {ι : Type u} (U : ι → (set α)), (∀ i, is_open (U i)) →
s ⊆ (⋃ i, U i) → (∃ (t : finset ι), s ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ t, U i))) :
is_compact s :=
is_compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed $
assume ι Z hZc hsZ,
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := h (λ i, (Z i)ᶜ) (assume i, is_open_compl_iff.mpr $ hZc i)
(by simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_Union,
exists_prop, mem_inter_eq, not_and, iff_self, mem_Inter, mem_compl_eq] using hsZ)
in
⟨t, by simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_Union,
exists_prop, mem_inter_eq, not_and, iff_self, mem_Inter, mem_compl_eq] using ht⟩
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
lemma is_compact_iff_finite_subcover :
is_compact s ↔ (Π {ι : Type u} (U : ι → (set α)), (∀ i, is_open (U i)) →
s ⊆ (⋃ i, U i) → (∃ (t : finset ι), s ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ t, U i))) :=
⟨assume hs ι, hs.elim_finite_subcover, is_compact_of_finite_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem is_compact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed :
is_compact s ↔ (Π {ι : Type u} (Z : ι → (set α)), (∀ i, is_closed (Z i)) →
s ∩ (⋂ i, Z i) = ∅ → (∃ (t : finset ι), s ∩ (⋂ i ∈ t, Z i) = ∅)) :=
⟨assume hs ι, hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed, is_compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed⟩
@[simp]
lemma is_compact_empty : is_compact (∅ : set α) :=
assume f hnf hsf, not.elim hnf.ne $
empty_mem_iff_bot.1 $ le_principal_iff.1 hsf
@[simp]
lemma is_compact_singleton {a : α} : is_compact ({a} : set α) :=
λ f hf hfa, ⟨a, rfl, cluster_pt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans $ by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds a) hf⟩
lemma set.subsingleton.is_compact {s : set α} (hs : s.subsingleton) : is_compact s :=
subsingleton.induction_on hs is_compact_empty $ λ x, is_compact_singleton
lemma set.finite.compact_bUnion {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : finite s)
(hf : ∀i ∈ s, is_compact (f i)) :
is_compact (⋃i ∈ s, f i) :=
is_compact_of_finite_subcover $ assume ι U hUo hsU,
have ∀i : subtype s, ∃t : finset ι, f i ⊆ (⋃ j ∈ t, U j), from
assume ⟨i, hi⟩, (hf i hi).elim_finite_subcover _ hUo
(calc f i ⊆ ⋃i ∈ s, f i : subset_bUnion_of_mem hi
... ⊆ ⋃j, U j : hsU),
let ⟨finite_subcovers, h⟩ := axiom_of_choice this in
by haveI : fintype (subtype s) := hs.fintype; exact
let t := finset.bUnion finset.univ finite_subcovers in
have (⋃i ∈ s, f i) ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ t, U i), from bUnion_subset $
assume i hi, calc
f i ⊆ (⋃ j ∈ finite_subcovers ⟨i, hi⟩, U j) : (h ⟨i, hi⟩)
... ⊆ (⋃ j ∈ t, U j) : bUnion_subset_bUnion_left $
assume j hj, finset.mem_bUnion.mpr ⟨_, finset.mem_univ _, hj⟩,
⟨t, this⟩
lemma finset.compact_bUnion (s : finset β) {f : β → set α} (hf : ∀i ∈ s, is_compact (f i)) :
is_compact (⋃i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_to_set.compact_bUnion hf
lemma compact_accumulate {K : ℕ → set α} (hK : ∀ n, is_compact (K n)) (n : ℕ) :
is_compact (accumulate K n) :=
(finite_le_nat n).compact_bUnion $ λ k _, hK k
lemma compact_Union {f : β → set α} [fintype β]
(h : ∀i, is_compact (f i)) : is_compact (⋃i, f i) :=
by rw ← bUnion_univ; exact finite_univ.compact_bUnion (λ i _, h i)
lemma set.finite.is_compact (hs : finite s) : is_compact s :=
bUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.compact_bUnion (λ _ _, is_compact_singleton)
lemma finite_of_is_compact_of_discrete [discrete_topology α] (s : set α) (hs : is_compact s) :
s.finite :=
begin
have := hs.elim_finite_subcover (λ x : α, ({x} : set α))
(λ x, is_open_discrete _),
simp only [set.subset_univ, forall_prop_of_true, set.Union_of_singleton] at this,
rcases this with ⟨t, ht⟩,
suffices : (⋃ (i : α) (H : i ∈ t), {i} : set α) = (t : set α),
{ rw this at ht, exact t.finite_to_set.subset ht },
ext x,
simp only [exists_prop, set.mem_Union, set.mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_right', finset.mem_coe]
end
lemma is_compact.union (hs : is_compact s) (ht : is_compact t) : is_compact (s ∪ t) :=
by rw union_eq_Union; exact compact_Union (λ b, by cases b; assumption)
lemma is_compact.insert (hs : is_compact s) (a) : is_compact (insert a s) :=
is_compact_singleton.union hs
/-- If `V : ι → set α` is a decreasing family of closed compact sets then any neighborhood of
`⋂ i, V i` contains some `V i`. We assume each `V i` is compact *and* closed because `α` is
not assumed to be Hausdorff. See `exists_subset_nhd_of_compact` for version assuming this. -/
lemma exists_subset_nhd_of_compact' {ι : Type*} [nonempty ι] {V : ι → set α} (hV : directed (⊇) V)
(hV_cpct : ∀ i, is_compact (V i)) (hV_closed : ∀ i, is_closed (V i))
{U : set α} (hU : ∀ x ∈ ⋂ i, V i, U ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ i, V i ⊆ U :=
begin
set Y := ⋂ i, V i,
obtain ⟨W, hsubW, W_op, hWU⟩ : ∃ W, Y ⊆ W ∧ is_open W ∧ W ⊆ U,
from exists_open_set_nhds hU,
suffices : ∃ i, V i ⊆ W,
{ rcases this with ⟨i, hi⟩,
refine ⟨i, set.subset.trans hi hWU⟩ },
by_contradiction H,
push_neg at H,
replace H : ∀ i, (V i ∩ Wᶜ).nonempty := λ i, set.inter_compl_nonempty_iff.mpr (H i),
have : (⋂ i, V i ∩ Wᶜ).nonempty,
{ apply is_compact.nonempty_Inter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed _ _ H,
{ intro i,
exact (hV_cpct i).inter_right W_op.is_closed_compl },
{ intro i,
apply (hV_closed i).inter W_op.is_closed_compl },
{ intros i j,
rcases hV i j with ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩,
use k,
split ; intro x ; simp only [and_imp, mem_inter_eq, mem_compl_eq] ; tauto } },
have : ¬ (⋂ (i : ι), V i) ⊆ W,
by simpa [← Inter_inter, inter_compl_nonempty_iff],
contradiction
end
/-- `filter.cocompact` is the filter generated by complements to compact sets. -/
def filter.cocompact (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : filter α :=
⨅ (s : set α) (hs : is_compact s), 𝓟 (sᶜ)
lemma filter.has_basis_cocompact : (filter.cocompact α).has_basis is_compact compl :=
has_basis_binfi_principal'
(λ s hs t ht, ⟨s ∪ t, hs.union ht, compl_subset_compl.2 (subset_union_left s t),
compl_subset_compl.2 (subset_union_right s t)⟩)
⟨∅, is_compact_empty⟩
lemma filter.mem_cocompact : s ∈ filter.cocompact α ↔ ∃ t, is_compact t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
filter.has_basis_cocompact.mem_iff.trans $ exists_congr $ λ t, exists_prop
lemma filter.mem_cocompact' : s ∈ filter.cocompact α ↔ ∃ t, is_compact t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t :=
filter.mem_cocompact.trans $ exists_congr $ λ t, and_congr_right $ λ ht, compl_subset_comm
lemma is_compact.compl_mem_cocompact (hs : is_compact s) : sᶜ ∈ filter.cocompact α :=
filter.has_basis_cocompact.mem_of_mem hs
section tube_lemma
variables [topological_space β]
/-- `nhds_contain_boxes s t` means that any open neighborhood of `s × t` in `α × β` includes
a product of an open neighborhood of `s` by an open neighborhood of `t`. -/
def nhds_contain_boxes (s : set α) (t : set β) : Prop :=
∀ (n : set (α × β)) (hn : is_open n) (hp : set.prod s t ⊆ n),
∃ (u : set α) (v : set β), is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ set.prod u v ⊆ n
lemma nhds_contain_boxes.symm {s : set α} {t : set β} :
nhds_contain_boxes s t → nhds_contain_boxes t s :=
assume H n hn hp,
let ⟨u, v, uo, vo, su, tv, p⟩ :=
H (prod.swap ⁻¹' n)
(hn.preimage continuous_swap)
(by rwa [←image_subset_iff, image_swap_prod]) in
⟨v, u, vo, uo, tv, su,
by rwa [←image_subset_iff, image_swap_prod] at p⟩
lemma nhds_contain_boxes.comm {s : set α} {t : set β} :
nhds_contain_boxes s t ↔ nhds_contain_boxes t s :=
iff.intro nhds_contain_boxes.symm nhds_contain_boxes.symm
lemma nhds_contain_boxes_of_singleton {x : α} {y : β} :
nhds_contain_boxes ({x} : set α) ({y} : set β) :=
assume n hn hp,
let ⟨u, v, uo, vo, xu, yv, hp'⟩ :=
is_open_prod_iff.mp hn x y (hp $ by simp) in
⟨u, v, uo, vo, by simpa, by simpa, hp'⟩
lemma nhds_contain_boxes_of_compact {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (t : set β)
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, nhds_contain_boxes ({x} : set α) t) : nhds_contain_boxes s t :=
assume n hn hp,
have ∀x : subtype s, ∃uv : set α × set β,
is_open uv.1 ∧ is_open uv.2 ∧ {↑x} ⊆ uv.1 ∧ t ⊆ uv.2 ∧ set.prod uv.1 uv.2 ⊆ n,
from assume ⟨x, hx⟩,
have set.prod {x} t ⊆ n, from
subset.trans (prod_mono (by simpa) (subset.refl _)) hp,
let ⟨ux,vx,H1⟩ := H x hx n hn this in ⟨⟨ux,vx⟩,H1⟩,
let ⟨uvs, h⟩ := classical.axiom_of_choice this in
have us_cover : s ⊆ ⋃i, (uvs i).1, from
assume x hx, subset_Union _ ⟨x,hx⟩ (by simpa using (h ⟨x,hx⟩).2.2.1),
let ⟨s0, s0_cover⟩ :=
hs.elim_finite_subcover _ (λi, (h i).1) us_cover in
let u := ⋃(i ∈ s0), (uvs i).1 in
let v := ⋂(i ∈ s0), (uvs i).2 in
have is_open u, from is_open_bUnion (λi _, (h i).1),
have is_open v, from is_open_bInter s0.finite_to_set (λi _, (h i).2.1),
have t ⊆ v, from subset_bInter (λi _, (h i).2.2.2.1),
have set.prod u v ⊆ n, from assume ⟨x',y'⟩ ⟨hx',hy'⟩,
have ∃i ∈ s0, x' ∈ (uvs i).1, by simpa using hx',
let ⟨i,is0,hi⟩ := this in
(h i).2.2.2.2 ⟨hi, (bInter_subset_of_mem is0 : v ⊆ (uvs i).2) hy'⟩,
⟨u, v, ‹is_open u›, ‹is_open v›, s0_cover, ‹t ⊆ v›, ‹set.prod u v ⊆ n›⟩
/-- If `s` and `t` are compact sets and `n` is an open neighborhood of `s × t`, then there exist
open neighborhoods `u ⊇ s` and `v ⊇ t` such that `u × v ⊆ n`. -/
lemma generalized_tube_lemma {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) {t : set β} (ht : is_compact t)
{n : set (α × β)} (hn : is_open n) (hp : set.prod s t ⊆ n) :
∃ (u : set α) (v : set β), is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ set.prod u v ⊆ n :=
have _, from
nhds_contain_boxes_of_compact hs t $ assume x _, nhds_contain_boxes.symm $
nhds_contain_boxes_of_compact ht {x} $ assume y _, nhds_contain_boxes_of_singleton,
this n hn hp
end tube_lemma
/-- Type class for compact spaces. Separation is sometimes included in the definition, especially
in the French literature, but we do not include it here. -/
class compact_space (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(compact_univ : is_compact (univ : set α))
@[priority 10] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance subsingleton.compact_space [subsingleton α] : compact_space α :=
⟨subsingleton_univ.is_compact⟩
lemma compact_univ [h : compact_space α] : is_compact (univ : set α) := h.compact_univ
lemma cluster_point_of_compact [compact_space α] (f : filter α) [ne_bot f] :
∃ x, cluster_pt x f :=
by simpa using compact_univ (show f ≤ 𝓟 univ, by simp)
lemma compact_space.elim_nhds_subcover {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [compact_space α]
(U : α → set α) (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : finset α, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) = ⊤ :=
begin
obtain ⟨t, -, s⟩ := is_compact.elim_nhds_subcover compact_univ U (λ x m, hU x),
exact ⟨t, by { rw eq_top_iff, exact s }⟩,
end
theorem compact_space_of_finite_subfamily_closed {α : Type u} [topological_space α]
(h : Π {ι : Type u} (Z : ι → (set α)), (∀ i, is_closed (Z i)) →
(⋂ i, Z i) = ∅ → ∃ (t : finset ι), (⋂ i ∈ t, Z i) = ∅) :
compact_space α :=
{ compact_univ :=
begin
apply is_compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed,
intros ι Z, specialize h Z,
simpa using h
end }
lemma is_closed.is_compact [compact_space α] {s : set α} (h : is_closed s) :
is_compact s :=
compact_of_is_closed_subset compact_univ h (subset_univ _)
/-- A compact discrete space is finite. -/
noncomputable
def fintype_of_compact_of_discrete [compact_space α] [discrete_topology α] :
fintype α :=
fintype_of_univ_finite $ finite_of_is_compact_of_discrete _ compact_univ
lemma finite_cover_nhds_interior [compact_space α] {U : α → set α} (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : finset α, (⋃ x ∈ t, interior (U x)) = univ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := compact_univ.elim_finite_subcover (λ x, interior (U x)) (λ x, is_open_interior)
(λ x _, mem_Union.2 ⟨x, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 (hU x)⟩)
in ⟨t, univ_subset_iff.1 ht⟩
lemma finite_cover_nhds [compact_space α] {U : α → set α} (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : finset α, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) = univ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := finite_cover_nhds_interior hU in ⟨t, univ_subset_iff.1 $
ht ▸ bUnion_subset_bUnion_right (λ x hx, interior_subset)⟩
/-- If `α` is a compact space, then a locally finite family of sets of `α` can have only finitely
many nonempty elements. -/
lemma locally_finite.finite_nonempty_of_compact {ι : Type*} [compact_space α] {f : ι → set α}
(hf : locally_finite f) :
finite {i | (f i).nonempty} :=
by simpa only [inter_univ] using hf.finite_nonempty_inter_compact compact_univ
/-- If `α` is a compact space, then a locally finite family of nonempty sets of `α` can have only
finitely many elements, `set.finite` version. -/
lemma locally_finite.finite_of_compact {ι : Type*} [compact_space α] {f : ι → set α}
(hf : locally_finite f) (hne : ∀ i, (f i).nonempty) :
finite (univ : set ι) :=
by simpa only [hne] using hf.finite_nonempty_of_compact
/-- If `α` is a compact space, then a locally finite family of nonempty sets of `α` can have only
finitely many elements, `fintype` version. -/
noncomputable def locally_finite.fintype_of_compact {ι : Type*} [compact_space α] {f : ι → set α}
(hf : locally_finite f) (hne : ∀ i, (f i).nonempty) :
fintype ι :=
fintype_of_univ_finite (hf.finite_of_compact hne)
variables [topological_space β]
lemma is_compact.image_of_continuous_on {f : α → β} (hs : is_compact s) (hf : continuous_on f s) :
is_compact (f '' s) :=
begin
intros l lne ls,
have : ne_bot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_ne_bot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls),
obtain ⟨a, has, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ s, cluster_pt a (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @@hs this inf_le_right,
use [f a, mem_image_of_mem f has],
have : tendsto f (𝓝 a ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f a) ⊓ l),
{ convert (hf a has).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1,
rw nhds_within,
ac_refl },
exact @@tendsto.ne_bot _ this ha,
end
lemma is_compact.image {f : α → β} (hs : is_compact s) (hf : continuous f) :
is_compact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuous_on hf.continuous_on
lemma is_compact_range [compact_space α] {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) :
is_compact (range f) :=
by rw ← image_univ; exact compact_univ.image hf
/-- If X is is_compact then pr₂ : X × Y → Y is a closed map -/
theorem is_closed_proj_of_is_compact
{X : Type*} [topological_space X] [compact_space X]
{Y : Type*} [topological_space Y] :
is_closed_map (prod.snd : X × Y → Y) :=
begin
set πX := (prod.fst : X × Y → X),
set πY := (prod.snd : X × Y → Y),
assume C (hC : is_closed C),
rw is_closed_iff_cluster_pt at hC ⊢,
assume y (y_closure : cluster_pt y $ 𝓟 (πY '' C)),
have : ne_bot (map πX (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C)),
{ suffices : ne_bot (map πY (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C)),
by simpa only [map_ne_bot_iff],
convert y_closure,
calc map πY (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C) =
𝓝 y ⊓ map πY (𝓟 C) : filter.push_pull' _ _ _
... = 𝓝 y ⊓ 𝓟 (πY '' C) : by rw map_principal },
resetI,
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, cluster_pt x (map πX (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C)),
from cluster_point_of_compact _,
refine ⟨⟨x, y⟩, _, by simp [πY]⟩,
apply hC,
rw [cluster_pt, ← filter.map_ne_bot_iff πX],
convert hx,
calc map πX (𝓝 (x, y) ⊓ 𝓟 C)
= map πX (comap πX (𝓝 x) ⊓ comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C) : by rw [nhds_prod_eq, filter.prod]
... = map πX (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C ⊓ comap πX (𝓝 x)) : by ac_refl
... = map πX (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C) ⊓ 𝓝 x : by rw filter.push_pull
... = 𝓝 x ⊓ map πX (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C) : by rw inf_comm
end
lemma exists_subset_nhd_of_compact_space [compact_space α] {ι : Type*} [nonempty ι]
{V : ι → set α} (hV : directed (⊇) V) (hV_closed : ∀ i, is_closed (V i))
{U : set α} (hU : ∀ x ∈ ⋂ i, V i, U ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ i, V i ⊆ U :=
exists_subset_nhd_of_compact' hV (λ i, (hV_closed i).is_compact) hV_closed hU
lemma embedding.is_compact_iff_is_compact_image {f : α → β} (hf : embedding f) :
is_compact s ↔ is_compact (f '' s) :=
iff.intro (assume h, h.image hf.continuous) $ assume h, begin
rw is_compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds at ⊢ h,
intros u us',
have : ↑(u.map f) ≤ 𝓟 (f '' s), begin
rw [ultrafilter.coe_map, map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_principal], convert us',
exact preimage_image_eq _ hf.inj
end,
rcases h (u.map f) this with ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, ⟨⟩⟩, _⟩,
refine ⟨a, ha, _⟩,
rwa [hf.induced, nhds_induced, ←map_le_iff_le_comap]
end
/-- A closed embedding is proper, ie, inverse images of compact sets are contained in compacts. -/
lemma closed_embedding.tendsto_cocompact
{f : α → β} (hf : closed_embedding f) : tendsto f (filter.cocompact α) (filter.cocompact β) :=
begin
rw filter.has_basis_cocompact.tendsto_iff filter.has_basis_cocompact,
intros K hK,
refine ⟨f ⁻¹' (K ∩ (set.range f)), _, λ x hx, by simpa using hx⟩,
apply hf.to_embedding.is_compact_iff_is_compact_image.mpr,
rw set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset (set.inter_subset_right _ _),
exact hK.inter_right hf.closed_range,
end
lemma compact_iff_compact_in_subtype {p : α → Prop} {s : set {a // p a}} :
is_compact s ↔ is_compact ((coe : _ → α) '' s) :=
embedding_subtype_coe.is_compact_iff_is_compact_image
lemma is_compact_iff_is_compact_univ {s : set α} : is_compact s ↔ is_compact (univ : set s) :=
by rw [compact_iff_compact_in_subtype, image_univ, subtype.range_coe]; refl
lemma is_compact_iff_compact_space {s : set α} : is_compact s ↔ compact_space s :=
is_compact_iff_is_compact_univ.trans ⟨λ h, ⟨h⟩, @compact_space.compact_univ _ _⟩
lemma is_compact.prod {s : set α} {t : set β} (hs : is_compact s) (ht : is_compact t) :
is_compact (set.prod s t) :=
begin
rw is_compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds at hs ht ⊢,
intros f hfs,
rw le_principal_iff at hfs,
obtain ⟨a : α, sa : a ∈ s, ha : map prod.fst ↑f ≤ 𝓝 a⟩ :=
hs (f.map prod.fst) (le_principal_iff.2 $ mem_map.2 $ mem_of_superset hfs (λ x, and.left)),
obtain ⟨b : β, tb : b ∈ t, hb : map prod.snd ↑f ≤ 𝓝 b⟩ :=
ht (f.map prod.snd) (le_principal_iff.2 $ mem_map.2 $
mem_of_superset hfs (λ x, and.right)),
rw map_le_iff_le_comap at ha hb,
refine ⟨⟨a, b⟩, ⟨sa, tb⟩, _⟩,
rw nhds_prod_eq, exact le_inf ha hb
end
lemma inducing.is_compact_iff {f : α → β} (hf : inducing f) {s : set α} :
is_compact (f '' s) ↔ is_compact s :=
begin
split,
{ introsI hs F F_ne_bot F_le,
obtain ⟨_, ⟨x, x_in : x ∈ s, rfl⟩, hx : cluster_pt (f x) (map f F)⟩ :=
hs (calc map f F ≤ map f (𝓟 s) : map_mono F_le
... = 𝓟 (f '' s) : map_principal),
use [x, x_in],
suffices : (map f (𝓝 x ⊓ F)).ne_bot, by simpa [filter.map_ne_bot_iff],
rwa calc map f (𝓝 x ⊓ F) = map f ((comap f $ 𝓝 $ f x) ⊓ F) : by rw hf.nhds_eq_comap
... = 𝓝 (f x) ⊓ map f F : filter.push_pull' _ _ _ },
{ intro hs,
exact hs.image hf.continuous }
end
/-- Finite topological spaces are compact. -/
@[priority 100] instance fintype.compact_space [fintype α] : compact_space α :=
{ compact_univ := finite_univ.is_compact }
/-- The product of two compact spaces is compact. -/
instance [compact_space α] [compact_space β] : compact_space (α × β) :=
⟨by { rw ← univ_prod_univ, exact compact_univ.prod compact_univ }⟩
/-- The disjoint union of two compact spaces is compact. -/
instance [compact_space α] [compact_space β] : compact_space (α ⊕ β) :=
⟨begin
rw ← range_inl_union_range_inr,
exact (is_compact_range continuous_inl).union (is_compact_range continuous_inr)
end⟩
/-- The coproduct of the cocompact filters on two topological spaces is the cocompact filter on
their product. -/
lemma filter.coprod_cocompact {β : Type*} [topological_space β]:
(filter.cocompact α).coprod (filter.cocompact β) = filter.cocompact (α × β) :=
begin
ext S,
simp only [mem_coprod_iff, exists_prop, mem_comap, filter.mem_cocompact],
split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨A, ⟨t, ht, hAt⟩, hAS⟩, B, ⟨t', ht', hBt'⟩, hBS⟩,
refine ⟨t.prod t', ht.prod ht', _⟩,
refine subset.trans _ (union_subset hAS hBS),
rw compl_subset_comm at ⊢ hAt hBt',
refine subset.trans _ (set.prod_mono hAt hBt'),
intros x,
simp only [compl_union, mem_inter_eq, mem_prod, mem_preimage, mem_compl_eq],
tauto },
{ rintros ⟨t, ht, htS⟩,
refine ⟨⟨(prod.fst '' t)ᶜ, _, _⟩, ⟨(prod.snd '' t)ᶜ, _, _⟩⟩,
{ exact ⟨prod.fst '' t, ht.image continuous_fst, subset.rfl⟩ },
{ rw preimage_compl,
rw compl_subset_comm at ⊢ htS,
exact subset.trans htS (subset_preimage_image prod.fst _) },
{ exact ⟨prod.snd '' t, ht.image continuous_snd, subset.rfl⟩ },
{ rw preimage_compl,
rw compl_subset_comm at ⊢ htS,
exact subset.trans htS (subset_preimage_image prod.snd _) } }
end
section tychonoff
variables {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, topological_space (π i)]
/-- **Tychonoff's theorem** -/
lemma is_compact_pi_infinite {s : Π i, set (π i)} :
(∀ i, is_compact (s i)) → is_compact {x : Π i, π i | ∀ i, x i ∈ s i} :=
begin
simp only [is_compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, nhds_pi, exists_prop, mem_set_of_eq, le_infi_iff,
le_principal_iff],
intros h f hfs,
have : ∀i:ι, ∃a, a∈s i ∧ tendsto (λx:Πi:ι, π i, x i) f (𝓝 a),
{ refine λ i, h i (f.map _) (mem_map.2 _),
exact mem_of_superset hfs (λ x hx, hx i) },
choose a ha,
exact ⟨a, assume i, (ha i).left, assume i, (ha i).right.le_comap⟩
end
/-- A version of Tychonoff's theorem that uses `set.pi`. -/
lemma is_compact_univ_pi {s : Π i, set (π i)} (h : ∀ i, is_compact (s i)) :
is_compact (pi univ s) :=
by { convert is_compact_pi_infinite h, simp only [pi, forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ] }
instance pi.compact_space [∀ i, compact_space (π i)] : compact_space (Πi, π i) :=
⟨by { rw [← pi_univ univ], exact is_compact_univ_pi (λ i, compact_univ) }⟩
/-- Product of compact sets is compact -/
lemma filter.Coprod_cocompact {δ : Type*} {κ : δ → Type*} [Π d, topological_space (κ d)] :
filter.Coprod (λ d, filter.cocompact (κ d)) = filter.cocompact (Π d, κ d) :=
begin
ext S,
simp only [mem_coprod_iff, exists_prop, mem_comap, filter.mem_cocompact],
split,
{ intros h,
rw filter.mem_Coprod_iff at h,
choose t ht1 ht2 using h,
choose t1 ht11 ht12 using λ d, filter.mem_cocompact.mp (ht1 d),
refine ⟨set.pi set.univ t1, _, _⟩,
{ convert is_compact_pi_infinite ht11,
ext,
simp },
{ refine subset.trans _ (set.Union_subset ht2),
intros x,
simp only [mem_Union, mem_univ_pi, exists_imp_distrib, mem_compl_eq, not_forall],
intros d h,
exact ⟨d, ht12 d h⟩ } },
{ rintros ⟨t, h1, h2⟩,
rw filter.mem_Coprod_iff,
intros d,
refine ⟨((λ (k : Π (d : δ), κ d), k d) '' t)ᶜ, _, _⟩,
{ rw filter.mem_cocompact,
refine ⟨(λ (k : Π (d : δ), κ d), k d) '' t, _, set.subset.refl _⟩,
exact is_compact.image h1 (continuous_pi_iff.mp (continuous_id) d) },
refine subset.trans _ h2,
intros x hx,
simp only [not_exists, mem_image, mem_preimage, mem_compl_eq] at hx,
simpa using mt (hx x) },
end
end tychonoff
instance quot.compact_space {r : α → α → Prop} [compact_space α] :
compact_space (quot r) :=
⟨by { rw ← range_quot_mk, exact is_compact_range continuous_quot_mk }⟩
instance quotient.compact_space {s : setoid α} [compact_space α] :
compact_space (quotient s) :=
quot.compact_space
/-- There are various definitions of "locally compact space" in the literature, which agree for
Hausdorff spaces but not in general. This one is the precise condition on X needed for the
evaluation `map C(X, Y) × X → Y` to be continuous for all `Y` when `C(X, Y)` is given the
compact-open topology. -/
class locally_compact_space (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(local_compact_nhds : ∀ (x : α) (n ∈ 𝓝 x), ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, s ⊆ n ∧ is_compact s)
lemma compact_basis_nhds [locally_compact_space α] (x : α) :
(𝓝 x).has_basis (λ s, s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ is_compact s) (λ s, s) :=
has_basis_self.2 $ by simpa only [and_comm] using locally_compact_space.local_compact_nhds x
lemma locally_compact_space_of_has_basis {ι : α → Type*} {p : Π x, ι x → Prop}
{s : Π x, ι x → set α} (h : ∀ x, (𝓝 x).has_basis (p x) (s x))
(hc : ∀ x i, p x i → is_compact (s x i)) :
locally_compact_space α :=
⟨λ x t ht, let ⟨i, hp, ht⟩ := (h x).mem_iff.1 ht in ⟨s x i, (h x).mem_of_mem hp, ht, hc x i hp⟩⟩
instance locally_compact_space.prod (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [topological_space α]
[topological_space β] [locally_compact_space α] [locally_compact_space β] :
locally_compact_space (α × β) :=
have _ := λ x : α × β, (compact_basis_nhds x.1).prod_nhds' (compact_basis_nhds x.2),
locally_compact_space_of_has_basis this $ λ x s ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, _, h₂⟩, h₁.prod h₂
/-- A reformulation of the definition of locally compact space: In a locally compact space,
every open set containing `x` has a compact subset containing `x` in its interior. -/
lemma exists_compact_subset [locally_compact_space α] {x : α} {U : set α}
(hU : is_open U) (hx : x ∈ U) : ∃ (K : set α), is_compact K ∧ x ∈ interior K ∧ K ⊆ U :=
begin
rcases locally_compact_space.local_compact_nhds x U (hU.mem_nhds hx) with ⟨K, h1K, h2K, h3K⟩,
exact ⟨K, h3K, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 h1K, h2K⟩,
end
/-- In a locally compact space every point has a compact neighborhood. -/
lemma exists_compact_mem_nhds [locally_compact_space α] (x : α) :
∃ K, is_compact K ∧ K ∈ 𝓝 x :=
let ⟨K, hKc, hx, H⟩ := exists_compact_subset is_open_univ (mem_univ x)
in ⟨K, hKc, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hx⟩
/-- In a locally compact space, every compact set is contained in the interior of a compact set. -/
lemma exists_compact_superset [locally_compact_space α] {K : set α} (hK : is_compact K) :
∃ K', is_compact K' ∧ K ⊆ interior K' :=
begin
choose U hUc hxU using λ x : K, exists_compact_mem_nhds (x : α),
have : K ⊆ ⋃ x, interior (U x),
from λ x hx, mem_Union.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 (hxU _)⟩,
rcases hK.elim_finite_subcover _ _ this with ⟨t, ht⟩,
{ refine ⟨_, t.compact_bUnion (λ x _, hUc x), λ x hx, _⟩,
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 (ht hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hy⟩,
exact interior_mono (subset_bUnion_of_mem hyt) hy },
{ exact λ _, is_open_interior }
end
lemma ultrafilter.le_nhds_Lim [compact_space α] (F : ultrafilter α) :
↑F ≤ 𝓝 (@Lim _ _ (F : filter α).nonempty_of_ne_bot F) :=
begin
rcases compact_univ.ultrafilter_le_nhds F (by simp) with ⟨x, -, h⟩,
exact le_nhds_Lim ⟨x,h⟩,
end
theorem is_closed.exists_minimal_nonempty_closed_subset [compact_space α]
{S : set α} (hS : is_closed S) (hne : S.nonempty) :
∃ (V : set α),
V ⊆ S ∧ V.nonempty ∧ is_closed V ∧
(∀ (V' : set α), V' ⊆ V → V'.nonempty → is_closed V' → V' = V) :=
begin
let opens := {U : set α | Sᶜ ⊆ U ∧ is_open U ∧ Uᶜ.nonempty},
obtain ⟨U, ⟨Uc, Uo, Ucne⟩, h⟩ := zorn.zorn_subset opens (λ c hc hz, begin
by_cases hcne : c.nonempty,
{ obtain ⟨U₀, hU₀⟩ := hcne,
haveI : nonempty {U // U ∈ c} := ⟨⟨U₀, hU₀⟩⟩,
obtain ⟨U₀compl, U₀opn, U₀ne⟩ := hc hU₀,
use ⋃₀ c,
refine ⟨⟨_, _, _⟩, λ U hU a ha, ⟨U, hU, ha⟩⟩,
{ exact λ a ha, ⟨U₀, hU₀, U₀compl ha⟩ },
{ exact is_open_sUnion (λ _ h, (hc h).2.1) },
{ convert_to (⋂(U : {U // U ∈ c}), U.1ᶜ).nonempty,
{ ext,
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, set.mem_Inter, subtype.forall,
set.mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_compl_eq, subtype.val_eq_coe],
refl, },
apply is_compact.nonempty_Inter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed,
{ rintros ⟨U, hU⟩ ⟨U', hU'⟩,
obtain ⟨V, hVc, hVU, hVU'⟩ := zorn.chain.directed_on hz U hU U' hU',
exact ⟨⟨V, hVc⟩, set.compl_subset_compl.mpr hVU, set.compl_subset_compl.mpr hVU'⟩, },
{ exact λ U, (hc U.2).2.2, },
{ exact λ U, (is_closed_compl_iff.mpr (hc U.2).2.1).is_compact, },
{ exact λ U, (is_closed_compl_iff.mpr (hc U.2).2.1), } } },
{ use Sᶜ,
refine ⟨⟨set.subset.refl _, is_open_compl_iff.mpr hS, _⟩, λ U Uc, (hcne ⟨U, Uc⟩).elim⟩,
rw compl_compl,
exact hne, }
end),
refine ⟨Uᶜ, set.compl_subset_comm.mp Uc, Ucne, is_closed_compl_iff.mpr Uo, _⟩,
intros V' V'sub V'ne V'cls,
have : V'ᶜ = U,
{ refine h V'ᶜ ⟨_, is_open_compl_iff.mpr V'cls, _⟩ (set.subset_compl_comm.mp V'sub),
exact set.subset.trans Uc (set.subset_compl_comm.mp V'sub),
simp only [compl_compl, V'ne], },
rw [←this, compl_compl],
end
/-- A σ-compact space is a space that is the union of a countable collection of compact subspaces.
Note that a locally compact separable T₂ space need not be σ-compact.
The sequence can be extracted using `topological_space.compact_covering`. -/
class sigma_compact_space (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(exists_compact_covering : ∃ K : ℕ → set α, (∀ n, is_compact (K n)) ∧ (⋃ n, K n) = univ)
@[priority 200] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance compact_space.sigma_compact [compact_space α] : sigma_compact_space α :=
⟨⟨λ _, univ, λ _, compact_univ, Union_const _⟩⟩
lemma sigma_compact_space.of_countable (S : set (set α)) (Hc : countable S)
(Hcomp : ∀ s ∈ S, is_compact s) (HU : ⋃₀ S = univ) : sigma_compact_space α :=
⟨(exists_seq_cover_iff_countable ⟨_, is_compact_empty⟩).2 ⟨S, Hc, Hcomp, HU⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance sigma_compact_space_of_locally_compact_second_countable [locally_compact_space α]
[second_countable_topology α] : sigma_compact_space α :=
begin
choose K hKc hxK using λ x : α, exists_compact_mem_nhds x,
rcases countable_cover_nhds hxK with ⟨s, hsc, hsU⟩,
refine sigma_compact_space.of_countable _ (hsc.image K) (ball_image_iff.2 $ λ x _, hKc x) _,
rwa sUnion_image
end
variables (α) [sigma_compact_space α]
open sigma_compact_space
/-- A choice of compact covering for a `σ`-compact space, chosen to be monotone. -/
def compact_covering : ℕ → set α :=
accumulate exists_compact_covering.some
lemma is_compact_compact_covering (n : ℕ) : is_compact (compact_covering α n) :=
compact_accumulate (classical.some_spec sigma_compact_space.exists_compact_covering).1 n
lemma Union_compact_covering : (⋃ n, compact_covering α n) = univ :=
begin
rw [compact_covering, Union_accumulate],
exact (classical.some_spec sigma_compact_space.exists_compact_covering).2
end
@[mono] lemma compact_covering_subset ⦃m n : ℕ⦄ (h : m ≤ n) :
compact_covering α m ⊆ compact_covering α n :=
monotone_accumulate h
variable {α}
lemma exists_mem_compact_covering (x : α) : ∃ n, x ∈ compact_covering α n :=
Union_eq_univ_iff.mp (Union_compact_covering α) x
/-- If `α` is a `σ`-compact space, then a locally finite family of nonempty sets of `α` can have
only countably many elements, `set.countable` version. -/
lemma locally_finite.countable_of_sigma_compact {ι : Type*} {f : ι → set α} (hf : locally_finite f)
(hne : ∀ i, (f i).nonempty) :
countable (univ : set ι) :=
begin
have := λ n, hf.finite_nonempty_inter_compact (is_compact_compact_covering α n),
refine (countable_Union (λ n, (this n).countable)).mono (λ i hi, _),
rcases hne i with ⟨x, hx⟩,
rcases Union_eq_univ_iff.1 (Union_compact_covering α) x with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact mem_Union.2 ⟨n, x, hx, hn⟩
end
/-- In a topological space with sigma compact topology, if `f` is a function that sends each point
`x` of a closed set `s` to a neighborhood of `x` within `s`, then for some countable set `t ⊆ s`,
the neighborhoods `f x`, `x ∈ t`, cover the whole set `s`. -/
lemma countable_cover_nhds_within_of_sigma_compact {f : α → set α} {s : set α} (hs : is_closed s)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t ⊆ s, countable t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, f x :=
begin
simp only [nhds_within, mem_inf_principal] at hf,
choose t ht hsub using λ n, ((is_compact_compact_covering α n).inter_right hs).elim_nhds_subcover
_ (λ x hx, hf x hx.right),
refine ⟨⋃ n, (t n : set α), Union_subset $ λ n x hx, (ht n x hx).2,
countable_Union $ λ n, (t n).countable_to_set, λ x hx, mem_bUnion_iff.2 _⟩,
rcases exists_mem_compact_covering x with ⟨n, hn⟩,
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 (hsub n ⟨hn, hx⟩) with ⟨y, hyt : y ∈ t n, hyf : x ∈ s → x ∈ f y⟩,
exact ⟨y, mem_Union.2 ⟨n, hyt⟩, hyf hx⟩
end
/-- In a topological space with sigma compact topology, if `f` is a function that sends each
point `x` to a neighborhood of `x`, then for some countable set `s`, the neighborhoods `f x`,
`x ∈ s`, cover the whole space. -/
lemma countable_cover_nhds_of_sigma_compact {f : α → set α}
(hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ s : set α, countable s ∧ (⋃ x ∈ s, f x) = univ :=
begin
simp only [← nhds_within_univ] at hf,
rcases countable_cover_nhds_within_of_sigma_compact is_closed_univ (λ x _, hf x)
with ⟨s, -, hsc, hsU⟩,
exact ⟨s, hsc, univ_subset_iff.1 hsU⟩
end
end compact
/-- An [exhaustion by compact sets](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exhaustion_by_compact_sets) of a
topological space is a sequence of compact sets `K n` such that `K n ⊆ interior (K (n + 1))` and
`(⋃ n, K n) = univ`.
If `X` is a locally compact sigma compact space, then `compact_exhaustion.choice X` provides
a choice of an exhaustion by compact sets. This choice is also available as
`(default : compact_exhaustion X)`. -/
structure compact_exhaustion (X : Type*) [topological_space X] :=
(to_fun : ℕ → set X)
(is_compact' : ∀ n, is_compact (to_fun n))
(subset_interior_succ' : ∀ n, to_fun n ⊆ interior (to_fun (n + 1)))
(Union_eq' : (⋃ n, to_fun n) = univ)
namespace compact_exhaustion
instance : has_coe_to_fun (compact_exhaustion α) := ⟨_, to_fun⟩
variables {α} (K : compact_exhaustion α)
protected lemma is_compact (n : ℕ) : is_compact (K n) := K.is_compact' n
lemma subset_interior_succ (n : ℕ) : K n ⊆ interior (K (n + 1)) :=
K.subset_interior_succ' n
lemma subset_succ (n : ℕ) : K n ⊆ K (n + 1) :=
subset.trans (K.subset_interior_succ n) interior_subset
@[mono] protected lemma subset ⦃m n : ℕ⦄ (h : m ≤ n) : K m ⊆ K n :=
show K m ≤ K n, from monotone_nat_of_le_succ K.subset_succ h
lemma subset_interior ⦃m n : ℕ⦄ (h : m < n) : K m ⊆ interior (K n) :=
subset.trans (K.subset_interior_succ m) $ interior_mono $ K.subset h
lemma Union_eq : (⋃ n, K n) = univ := K.Union_eq'
lemma exists_mem (x : α) : ∃ n, x ∈ K n := Union_eq_univ_iff.1 K.Union_eq x
/-- The minimal `n` such that `x ∈ K n`. -/
protected noncomputable def find (x : α) : ℕ := nat.find (K.exists_mem x)
lemma mem_find (x : α) : x ∈ K (K.find x) := nat.find_spec (K.exists_mem x)
lemma mem_iff_find_le {x : α} {n : ℕ} : x ∈ K n ↔ K.find x ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, nat.find_min' (K.exists_mem x) h, λ h, K.subset h $ K.mem_find x⟩
/-- Prepend the empty set to a compact exhaustion `K n`. -/
def shiftr : compact_exhaustion α :=
{ to_fun := λ n, nat.cases_on n ∅ K,
is_compact' := λ n, nat.cases_on n is_compact_empty K.is_compact,
subset_interior_succ' := λ n, nat.cases_on n (empty_subset _) K.subset_interior_succ,
Union_eq' := Union_eq_univ_iff.2 $ λ x, ⟨K.find x + 1, K.mem_find x⟩ }
@[simp] lemma find_shiftr (x : α) : K.shiftr.find x = K.find x + 1 :=
nat.find_comp_succ _ _ (not_mem_empty _)
lemma mem_diff_shiftr_find (x : α) : x ∈ K.shiftr (K.find x + 1) \ K.shiftr (K.find x) :=
⟨K.mem_find _, mt K.shiftr.mem_iff_find_le.1 $
by simp only [find_shiftr, not_le, nat.lt_succ_self]⟩
/-- A choice of an
[exhaustion by compact sets](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exhaustion_by_compact_sets)
of a locally compact sigma compact space. -/
noncomputable def choice (X : Type*) [topological_space X] [locally_compact_space X]
[sigma_compact_space X] : compact_exhaustion X :=
begin
apply classical.choice,
let K : ℕ → {s : set X // is_compact s} :=
λ n, nat.rec_on n ⟨∅, is_compact_empty⟩
(λ n s, ⟨(exists_compact_superset s.2).some ∪ compact_covering X n,
(exists_compact_superset s.2).some_spec.1.union (is_compact_compact_covering _ _)⟩),
refine ⟨⟨λ n, K n, λ n, (K n).2, λ n, _, _⟩⟩,
{ exact subset.trans (exists_compact_superset (K n).2).some_spec.2
(interior_mono $ subset_union_left _ _) },
{ refine univ_subset_iff.1 (Union_compact_covering X ▸ _),
exact Union_subset_Union2 (λ n, ⟨n + 1, subset_union_right _ _⟩) }
end
noncomputable instance [locally_compact_space α] [sigma_compact_space α] :
inhabited (compact_exhaustion α) :=
⟨compact_exhaustion.choice α⟩
end compact_exhaustion
section clopen
/-- A set is clopen if it is both open and closed. -/
def is_clopen (s : set α) : Prop :=
is_open s ∧ is_closed s
theorem is_clopen.union {s t : set α} (hs : is_clopen s) (ht : is_clopen t) : is_clopen (s ∪ t) :=
⟨is_open.union hs.1 ht.1, is_closed.union hs.2 ht.2⟩
theorem is_clopen.inter {s t : set α} (hs : is_clopen s) (ht : is_clopen t) : is_clopen (s ∩ t) :=
⟨is_open.inter hs.1 ht.1, is_closed.inter hs.2 ht.2⟩
@[simp] theorem is_clopen_empty : is_clopen (∅ : set α) :=
⟨is_open_empty, is_closed_empty⟩
@[simp] theorem is_clopen_univ : is_clopen (univ : set α) :=
⟨is_open_univ, is_closed_univ⟩
theorem is_clopen.compl {s : set α} (hs : is_clopen s) : is_clopen sᶜ :=
⟨hs.2.is_open_compl, is_closed_compl_iff.2 hs.1⟩
@[simp] theorem is_clopen_compl_iff {s : set α} : is_clopen sᶜ ↔ is_clopen s :=
⟨λ h, compl_compl s ▸ is_clopen.compl h, is_clopen.compl⟩
theorem is_clopen.diff {s t : set α} (hs : is_clopen s) (ht : is_clopen t) : is_clopen (s \ t) :=
hs.inter ht.compl
lemma is_clopen_Union {β : Type*} [fintype β] {s : β → set α}
(h : ∀ i, is_clopen (s i)) : is_clopen (⋃ i, s i) :=
⟨is_open_Union (forall_and_distrib.1 h).1, is_closed_Union (forall_and_distrib.1 h).2⟩
lemma is_clopen_bUnion {β : Type*} {s : finset β} {f : β → set α} (h : ∀i ∈ s, is_clopen $ f i) :
is_clopen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
begin
refine ⟨is_open_bUnion (λ i hi, (h i hi).1), _⟩,
show is_closed (⋃ (i : β) (H : i ∈ (s : set β)), f i),
rw bUnion_eq_Union,
exact is_closed_Union (λ ⟨i, hi⟩,(h i hi).2)
end
lemma is_clopen_Inter {β : Type*} [fintype β] {s : β → set α}
(h : ∀ i, is_clopen (s i)) : is_clopen (⋂ i, s i) :=
⟨(is_open_Inter (forall_and_distrib.1 h).1), (is_closed_Inter (forall_and_distrib.1 h).2)⟩
lemma is_clopen_bInter {β : Type*} {s : finset β} {f : β → set α} (h : ∀i∈s, is_clopen (f i)) :
is_clopen (⋂i∈s, f i) :=
⟨ is_open_bInter ⟨finset_coe.fintype s⟩ (λ i hi, (h i hi).1),
by {show is_closed (⋂ (i : β) (H : i ∈ (↑s : set β)), f i), rw bInter_eq_Inter,
apply is_closed_Inter, rintro ⟨i, hi⟩, exact (h i hi).2}⟩
lemma continuous_on.preimage_clopen_of_clopen {β: Type*} [topological_space β]
{f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β} (hf : continuous_on f s) (hs : is_clopen s)
(ht : is_clopen t) : is_clopen (s ∩ f⁻¹' t) :=
⟨continuous_on.preimage_open_of_open hf hs.1 ht.1,
continuous_on.preimage_closed_of_closed hf hs.2 ht.2⟩
/-- The intersection of a disjoint covering by two open sets of a clopen set will be clopen. -/
theorem is_clopen_inter_of_disjoint_cover_clopen {Z a b : set α} (h : is_clopen Z)
(cover : Z ⊆ a ∪ b) (ha : is_open a) (hb : is_open b) (hab : a ∩ b = ∅) : is_clopen (Z ∩ a) :=
begin
refine ⟨is_open.inter h.1 ha, _⟩,
have : is_closed (Z ∩ bᶜ) := is_closed.inter h.2 (is_closed_compl_iff.2 hb),
convert this using 1,
apply subset.antisymm,
{ exact inter_subset_inter_right Z (subset_compl_iff_disjoint.2 hab) },
{ rintros x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩,
exact ⟨hx₁, by simpa [not_mem_of_mem_compl hx₂] using cover hx₁⟩ }
end
@[simp] lemma is_clopen_discrete [discrete_topology α] (x : set α) : is_clopen x :=
⟨is_open_discrete _, is_closed_discrete _⟩
end clopen
section preirreducible
/-- A preirreducible set `s` is one where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens on `s`. -/
def is_preirreducible (s : set α) : Prop :=
∀ (u v : set α), is_open u → is_open v →
(s ∩ u).nonempty → (s ∩ v).nonempty → (s ∩ (u ∩ v)).nonempty
/-- An irreducible set `s` is one that is nonempty and
where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens on `s`. -/
def is_irreducible (s : set α) : Prop :=
s.nonempty ∧ is_preirreducible s
lemma is_irreducible.nonempty {s : set α} (h : is_irreducible s) :
s.nonempty := h.1
lemma is_irreducible.is_preirreducible {s : set α} (h : is_irreducible s) :
is_preirreducible s := h.2
theorem is_preirreducible_empty : is_preirreducible (∅ : set α) :=
λ _ _ _ _ _ ⟨x, h1, h2⟩, h1.elim
theorem is_irreducible_singleton {x} : is_irreducible ({x} : set α) :=
⟨singleton_nonempty x,
λ u v _ _ ⟨y, h1, h2⟩ ⟨z, h3, h4⟩, by rw mem_singleton_iff at h1 h3;
substs y z; exact ⟨x, rfl, h2, h4⟩⟩
theorem is_preirreducible.closure {s : set α} (H : is_preirreducible s) :
is_preirreducible (closure s) :=
λ u v hu hv ⟨y, hycs, hyu⟩ ⟨z, hzcs, hzv⟩,
let ⟨p, hpu, hps⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 hycs u hu hyu in
let ⟨q, hqv, hqs⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 hzcs v hv hzv in
let ⟨r, hrs, hruv⟩ := H u v hu hv ⟨p, hps, hpu⟩ ⟨q, hqs, hqv⟩ in
⟨r, subset_closure hrs, hruv⟩
lemma is_irreducible.closure {s : set α} (h : is_irreducible s) :
is_irreducible (closure s) :=
⟨h.nonempty.closure, h.is_preirreducible.closure⟩
theorem exists_preirreducible (s : set α) (H : is_preirreducible s) :
∃ t : set α, is_preirreducible t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ u, is_preirreducible u → t ⊆ u → u = t :=
let ⟨m, hm, hsm, hmm⟩ := zorn.zorn_subset_nonempty {t : set α | is_preirreducible t}
(λ c hc hcc hcn, let ⟨t, htc⟩ := hcn in
⟨⋃₀ c, λ u v hu hv ⟨y, hy, hyu⟩ ⟨z, hz, hzv⟩,
let ⟨p, hpc, hyp⟩ := mem_sUnion.1 hy,
⟨q, hqc, hzq⟩ := mem_sUnion.1 hz in
or.cases_on (zorn.chain.total hcc hpc hqc)
(assume hpq : p ⊆ q, let ⟨x, hxp, hxuv⟩ := hc hqc u v hu hv
⟨y, hpq hyp, hyu⟩ ⟨z, hzq, hzv⟩ in
⟨x, mem_sUnion_of_mem hxp hqc, hxuv⟩)
(assume hqp : q ⊆ p, let ⟨x, hxp, hxuv⟩ := hc hpc u v hu hv
⟨y, hyp, hyu⟩ ⟨z, hqp hzq, hzv⟩ in
⟨x, mem_sUnion_of_mem hxp hpc, hxuv⟩),
λ x hxc, subset_sUnion_of_mem hxc⟩) s H in
⟨m, hm, hsm, λ u hu hmu, hmm _ hu hmu⟩
/-- A maximal irreducible set that contains a given point. -/
def irreducible_component (x : α) : set α :=
classical.some (exists_preirreducible {x} is_irreducible_singleton.is_preirreducible)
lemma irreducible_component_property (x : α) :
is_preirreducible (irreducible_component x) ∧ {x} ⊆ (irreducible_component x) ∧
∀ u, is_preirreducible u → (irreducible_component x) ⊆ u → u = (irreducible_component x) :=
classical.some_spec (exists_preirreducible {x} is_irreducible_singleton.is_preirreducible)
theorem mem_irreducible_component {x : α} : x ∈ irreducible_component x :=
singleton_subset_iff.1 (irreducible_component_property x).2.1
theorem is_irreducible_irreducible_component {x : α} : is_irreducible (irreducible_component x) :=
⟨⟨x, mem_irreducible_component⟩, (irreducible_component_property x).1⟩
theorem eq_irreducible_component {x : α} :
∀ {s : set α}, is_preirreducible s → irreducible_component x ⊆ s → s = irreducible_component x :=
(irreducible_component_property x).2.2
theorem is_closed_irreducible_component {x : α} :
is_closed (irreducible_component x) :=
closure_eq_iff_is_closed.1 $ eq_irreducible_component
is_irreducible_irreducible_component.is_preirreducible.closure
subset_closure
/-- A preirreducible space is one where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens. -/
class preirreducible_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(is_preirreducible_univ [] : is_preirreducible (univ : set α))
/-- An irreducible space is one that is nonempty
and where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens. -/
class irreducible_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] extends preirreducible_space α : Prop :=
(to_nonempty [] : nonempty α)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance, priority 50] irreducible_space.to_nonempty
theorem nonempty_preirreducible_inter [preirreducible_space α] {s t : set α} :
is_open s → is_open t → s.nonempty → t.nonempty → (s ∩ t).nonempty :=
by simpa only [univ_inter, univ_subset_iff] using
@preirreducible_space.is_preirreducible_univ α _ _ s t
theorem is_preirreducible.image [topological_space β] {s : set α} (H : is_preirreducible s)
(f : α → β) (hf : continuous_on f s) : is_preirreducible (f '' s) :=
begin
rintros u v hu hv ⟨_, ⟨⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, hxu⟩⟩ ⟨_, ⟨⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hyv⟩⟩,
rw ← mem_preimage at hxu hyv,
rcases continuous_on_iff'.1 hf u hu with ⟨u', hu', u'_eq⟩,
rcases continuous_on_iff'.1 hf v hv with ⟨v', hv', v'_eq⟩,
have := H u' v' hu' hv',
rw [inter_comm s u', ← u'_eq] at this,
rw [inter_comm s v', ← v'_eq] at this,
rcases this ⟨x, hxu, hx⟩ ⟨y, hyv, hy⟩ with ⟨z, hzs, hzu', hzv'⟩,
refine ⟨f z, mem_image_of_mem f hzs, _, _⟩,
all_goals
{ rw ← mem_preimage,
apply mem_of_mem_inter_left,
show z ∈ _ ∩ s,
simp [*] }
end
theorem is_irreducible.image [topological_space β] {s : set α} (H : is_irreducible s)
(f : α → β) (hf : continuous_on f s) : is_irreducible (f '' s) :=
⟨nonempty_image_iff.mpr H.nonempty, H.is_preirreducible.image f hf⟩
lemma subtype.preirreducible_space {s : set α} (h : is_preirreducible s) :
preirreducible_space s :=
{ is_preirreducible_univ :=
begin
intros u v hu hv hsu hsv,
rw is_open_induced_iff at hu hv,
rcases hu with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩,
rcases hv with ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩,
rcases hsu with ⟨⟨x, hxs⟩, hxs', hxu⟩,
rcases hsv with ⟨⟨y, hys⟩, hys', hyv⟩,
rcases h u v hu hv ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩ with ⟨z, hzs, ⟨hzu, hzv⟩⟩,
exact ⟨⟨z, hzs⟩, ⟨set.mem_univ _, ⟨hzu, hzv⟩⟩⟩
end }
lemma subtype.irreducible_space {s : set α} (h : is_irreducible s) :
irreducible_space s :=
{ is_preirreducible_univ :=
(subtype.preirreducible_space h.is_preirreducible).is_preirreducible_univ,
to_nonempty := h.nonempty.to_subtype }
/-- A set `s` is irreducible if and only if
for every finite collection of open sets all of whose members intersect `s`,
`s` also intersects the intersection of the entire collection
(i.e., there is an element of `s` contained in every member of the collection). -/
lemma is_irreducible_iff_sInter {s : set α} :
is_irreducible s ↔
∀ (U : finset (set α)) (hU : ∀ u ∈ U, is_open u) (H : ∀ u ∈ U, (s ∩ u).nonempty),
(s ∩ ⋂₀ ↑U).nonempty :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ intro U, apply finset.induction_on U,
{ intros, simpa using h.nonempty },
{ intros u U hu IH hU H,
rw [finset.coe_insert, sInter_insert],
apply h.2,
{ solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_self] },
{ apply is_open_sInter (finset.finite_to_set U),
intros, solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_of_mem] },
{ solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_self] },
{ apply IH,
all_goals { intros, solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_of_mem] } } } },
{ split,
{ simpa using h ∅ _ _; intro u; simp },
intros u v hu hv hu' hv',
simpa using h {u,v} _ _,
all_goals
{ intro t,
rw [finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton],
rintro (rfl|rfl); assumption } }
end
/-- A set is preirreducible if and only if
for every cover by two closed sets, it is contained in one of the two covering sets. -/
lemma is_preirreducible_iff_closed_union_closed {s : set α} :
is_preirreducible s ↔
∀ (z₁ z₂ : set α), is_closed z₁ → is_closed z₂ → s ⊆ z₁ ∪ z₂ → s ⊆ z₁ ∨ s ⊆ z₂ :=
begin
split,
all_goals
{ intros h t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂,
specialize h t₁ᶜ t₂ᶜ,
simp only [is_open_compl_iff, is_closed_compl_iff] at h,
specialize h ht₁ ht₂ },
{ contrapose!, simp only [not_subset],
rintro ⟨⟨x, hx, hx'⟩, ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩⟩,
rcases h ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩ with ⟨z, hz, hz'⟩,
rw ← compl_union at hz',
exact ⟨z, hz, hz'⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩,
rw ← compl_inter at h,
delta set.nonempty,
rw imp_iff_not_or at h,
contrapose! h,
split,
{ intros z hz hz', exact h z ⟨hz, hz'⟩ },
{ split; intro H; refine H _ ‹_›; assumption } }
end
/-- A set is irreducible if and only if
for every cover by a finite collection of closed sets,
it is contained in one of the members of the collection. -/
lemma is_irreducible_iff_sUnion_closed {s : set α} :
is_irreducible s ↔
∀ (Z : finset (set α)) (hZ : ∀ z ∈ Z, is_closed z) (H : s ⊆ ⋃₀ ↑Z),
∃ z ∈ Z, s ⊆ z :=
begin
rw [is_irreducible, is_preirreducible_iff_closed_union_closed],
split; intro h,
{ intro Z, apply finset.induction_on Z,
{ intros, rw [finset.coe_empty, sUnion_empty] at H,
rcases h.1 with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exfalso, tauto },
{ intros z Z hz IH hZ H,
cases h.2 z (⋃₀ ↑Z) _ _ _
with h' h',
{ exact ⟨z, finset.mem_insert_self _ _, h'⟩ },
{ rcases IH _ h' with ⟨z', hz', hsz'⟩,
{ exact ⟨z', finset.mem_insert_of_mem hz', hsz'⟩ },
{ intros, solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_of_mem] } },
{ solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_self] },
{ rw sUnion_eq_bUnion,
apply is_closed_bUnion (finset.finite_to_set Z),
{ intros, solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_of_mem] } },
{ simpa using H } } },
{ split,
{ by_contradiction hs,
simpa using h ∅ _ _,
{ intro z, simp },
{ simpa [set.nonempty] using hs } },
intros z₁ z₂ hz₁ hz₂ H,
have := h {z₁, z₂} _ _,
simp only [exists_prop, finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton] at this,
{ rcases this with ⟨z, rfl|rfl, hz⟩; tauto },
{ intro t,
rw [finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton],
rintro (rfl|rfl); assumption },
{ simpa using H } }
end
end preirreducible
|
0915ea2cf350347db07f9534e43093d3ea2bd90c | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/finite_limits.lean | d0b5f63a173e5a18b84c320af94a0c798b5eff5d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,697 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import data.fintype.basic
import category_theory.fin_category
import category_theory.limits.shapes.products
import category_theory.limits.shapes.equalizers
import category_theory.limits.shapes.pullbacks
/-!
# Categories with finite limits.
A typeclass for categories with all finite (co)limits.
-/
universes v u
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.limits
variables (C : Type u) [category.{v} C]
/--
A category has all finite limits if every functor `J ⥤ C` with a `fin_category J` instance
has a limit.
This is often called 'finitely complete'.
-/
-- We can't just made this an `abbreviation`
-- because of https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/429
class has_finite_limits : Prop :=
(out (J : Type v) [𝒥 : small_category J] [@fin_category J 𝒥] : @has_limits_of_shape J 𝒥 C _)
@[priority 100]
instance has_limits_of_shape_of_has_finite_limits
(J : Type v) [small_category J] [fin_category J] [has_finite_limits C] :
has_limits_of_shape J C := has_finite_limits.out J
/-- If `C` has all limits, it has finite limits. -/
lemma has_finite_limits_of_has_limits [has_limits C] : has_finite_limits C :=
⟨λ J 𝒥₁ 𝒥₂, by apply_instance⟩
/--
A category has all finite colimits if every functor `J ⥤ C` with a `fin_category J` instance
has a colimit.
This is often called 'finitely cocomplete'.
-/
class has_finite_colimits : Prop :=
(out (J : Type v) [𝒥 : small_category J] [@fin_category J 𝒥] : @has_colimits_of_shape J 𝒥 C _)
@[priority 100]
instance has_limits_of_shape_of_has_finite_colimits
(J : Type v) [small_category J] [fin_category J] [has_finite_colimits C] :
has_colimits_of_shape J C := has_finite_colimits.out J
/-- If `C` has all colimits, it has finite colimits. -/
lemma has_finite_colimits_of_has_colimits [has_colimits C] : has_finite_colimits C :=
⟨λ J 𝒥₁ 𝒥₂, by apply_instance⟩
section
open walking_parallel_pair walking_parallel_pair_hom
instance fintype_walking_parallel_pair : fintype walking_parallel_pair :=
{ elems := [walking_parallel_pair.zero, walking_parallel_pair.one].to_finset,
complete := λ x, by { cases x; simp } }
local attribute [tidy] tactic.case_bash
instance (j j' : walking_parallel_pair) : fintype (walking_parallel_pair_hom j j') :=
{ elems := walking_parallel_pair.rec_on j
(walking_parallel_pair.rec_on j' [walking_parallel_pair_hom.id zero].to_finset
[left, right].to_finset)
(walking_parallel_pair.rec_on j' ∅ [walking_parallel_pair_hom.id one].to_finset),
complete := by tidy }
end
instance : fin_category walking_parallel_pair := { }
/-- Equalizers are finite limits, so if `C` has all finite limits, it also has all equalizers -/
example [has_finite_limits C] : has_equalizers C := by apply_instance
/-- Coequalizers are finite colimits, of if `C` has all finite colimits, it also has all
coequalizers -/
example [has_finite_colimits C] : has_coequalizers C := by apply_instance
variables {J : Type v}
local attribute [tidy] tactic.case_bash
namespace wide_pullback_shape
instance fintype_obj [fintype J] : fintype (wide_pullback_shape J) :=
by { rw wide_pullback_shape, apply_instance }
instance fintype_hom [decidable_eq J] (j j' : wide_pullback_shape J) :
fintype (j ⟶ j') :=
{ elems :=
begin
cases j',
{ cases j,
{ exact {hom.id none} },
{ exact {hom.term j} } },
{ by_cases some j' = j,
{ rw h,
exact {hom.id j} },
{ exact ∅ } }
end,
complete := by tidy }
end wide_pullback_shape
namespace wide_pushout_shape
instance fintype_obj [fintype J] : fintype (wide_pushout_shape J) :=
by { rw wide_pushout_shape, apply_instance }
instance fintype_hom [decidable_eq J] (j j' : wide_pushout_shape J) :
fintype (j ⟶ j') :=
{ elems :=
begin
cases j,
{ cases j',
{ exact {hom.id none} },
{ exact {hom.init j'} } },
{ by_cases some j = j',
{ rw h,
exact {hom.id j'} },
{ exact ∅ } }
end,
complete := by tidy }
end wide_pushout_shape
instance fin_category_wide_pullback [decidable_eq J] [fintype J] :
fin_category (wide_pullback_shape J) :=
{ fintype_hom := wide_pullback_shape.fintype_hom }
instance fin_category_wide_pushout [decidable_eq J] [fintype J] :
fin_category (wide_pushout_shape J) :=
{ fintype_hom := wide_pushout_shape.fintype_hom }
/--
`has_finite_wide_pullbacks` represents a choice of wide pullback
for every finite collection of morphisms
-/
-- We can't just made this an `abbreviation`
-- because of https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/429
class has_finite_wide_pullbacks : Prop :=
(out (J : Type v) [decidable_eq J] [fintype J] : has_limits_of_shape (wide_pullback_shape J) C)
instance has_limits_of_shape_wide_pullback_shape
(J : Type v) [fintype J] [has_finite_wide_pullbacks C] :
has_limits_of_shape (wide_pullback_shape J) C :=
by { haveI := @has_finite_wide_pullbacks.out C _ _ J (classical.dec_eq _), apply_instance }
/--
`has_finite_wide_pushouts` represents a choice of wide pushout
for every finite collection of morphisms
-/
class has_finite_wide_pushouts : Prop :=
(out (J : Type v) [decidable_eq J] [fintype J] : has_colimits_of_shape (wide_pushout_shape J) C)
instance has_colimits_of_shape_wide_pushout_shape
(J : Type v) [fintype J] [has_finite_wide_pushouts C] :
has_colimits_of_shape (wide_pushout_shape J) C :=
by { haveI := @has_finite_wide_pushouts.out C _ _ J (classical.dec_eq _), apply_instance }
/--
Finite wide pullbacks are finite limits, so if `C` has all finite limits,
it also has finite wide pullbacks
-/
lemma has_finite_wide_pullbacks_of_has_finite_limits [has_finite_limits C] :
has_finite_wide_pullbacks C :=
⟨λ J _ _, by exactI has_finite_limits.out _⟩
/--
Finite wide pushouts are finite colimits, so if `C` has all finite colimits,
it also has finite wide pushouts
-/
lemma has_finite_wide_pushouts_of_has_finite_limits [has_finite_colimits C] :
has_finite_wide_pushouts C :=
⟨λ J _ _, by exactI has_finite_colimits.out _⟩
instance fintype_walking_pair : fintype walking_pair :=
{ elems := {walking_pair.left, walking_pair.right},
complete := λ x, by { cases x; simp } }
/-- Pullbacks are finite limits, so if `C` has all finite limits, it also has all pullbacks -/
example [has_finite_wide_pullbacks C] : has_pullbacks C := by apply_instance
/-- Pushouts are finite colimits, so if `C` has all finite colimits, it also has all pushouts -/
example [has_finite_wide_pushouts C] : has_pushouts C := by apply_instance
end category_theory.limits
|
1fbe666782418426a3b90be196c83d0984ffd49d | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/tree_height.lean | 18f4be2077870c2fdd0996567b02fff9222ef566 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,120 | lean | import logic data.nat
open eq.ops nat algebra
inductive tree (A : Type) :=
| leaf : A → tree A
| node : tree A → tree A → tree A
namespace tree
definition height {A : Type} (t : tree A) : nat :=
tree.rec_on t
(λ a, zero)
(λ t₁ t₂ h₁ h₂, succ (max h₁ h₂))
definition height_lt {A : Type} : tree A → tree A → Prop :=
inv_image lt (@height A)
definition height_lt.wf (A : Type) : well_founded (@height_lt A) :=
inv_image.wf height lt.wf
theorem height_lt.node_left {A : Type} (t₁ t₂ : tree A) : height_lt t₁ (node t₁ t₂) :=
lt_succ_of_le (le_max_left (height t₁) (height t₂))
theorem height_lt.node_right {A : Type} (t₁ t₂ : tree A) : height_lt t₂ (node t₁ t₂) :=
lt_succ_of_le (le_max_right (height t₁) (height t₂))
theorem height_lt.trans {A : Type} : transitive (@height_lt A) :=
inv_image.trans lt height @nat.lt_trans
example : height_lt (leaf (2:nat)) (node (leaf 1) (leaf 2)) :=
!height_lt.node_right
example : height_lt (leaf (2:nat)) (node (node (leaf 1) (leaf 2)) (leaf 3)) :=
height_lt.trans !height_lt.node_right !height_lt.node_left
end tree
|
fc9804c2d0432a3fd6ad9f5f2ad7dd5ef76dea10 | 856e2e1615a12f95b551ed48fa5b03b245abba44 | /src/algebra/ring.lean | 32f088fbd0b6c6fe512926b96ae4a4ca93d13c89 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pimsp/mathlib | 8b77e1ccfab21703ba8fbe65988c7de7765aa0e5 | 913318ca9d6979686996e8d9b5ebf7e74aae1c63 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,812,465,182 | 1,597,133,610,000 | 1,597,133,610,000 | 281,890,685 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,595,491,577,000 | 1,595,491,576,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 38,349 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Amelia Livingston, Yury Kudryashov,
Neil Strickland
-/
import algebra.group_with_zero
/-!
# Properties and homomorphisms of semirings and rings
This file proves simple properties of semirings, rings and domains and their unit groups. It also
defines bundled homomorphisms of semirings and rings. As with monoid and groups, we use the same
structure `ring_hom a β`, a.k.a. `α →+* β`, for both homomorphism types.
The unbundled homomorphisms are defined in `deprecated/ring`. They are deprecated and the plan is to
slowly remove them from mathlib.
## Main definitions
ring_hom, nonzero, domain, integral_domain
## Notations
→+* for bundled ring homs (also use for semiring homs)
## Implementation notes
There's a coercion from bundled homs to fun, and the canonical
notation is to use the bundled hom as a function via this coercion.
There is no `semiring_hom` -- the idea is that `ring_hom` is used.
The constructor for a `ring_hom` between semirings needs a proof of `map_zero`, `map_one` and
`map_add` as well as `map_mul`; a separate constructor `ring_hom.mk'` will construct ring homs
between rings from monoid homs given only a proof that addition is preserved.
Throughout the section on `ring_hom` implicit `{}` brackets are often used instead
of type class `[]` brackets. This is done when the instances can be inferred because they are
implicit arguments to the type `ring_hom`. When they can be inferred from the type it is faster
to use this method than to use type class inference.
## Tags
`ring_hom`, `semiring_hom`, `semiring`, `comm_semiring`, `ring`, `comm_ring`, `domain`,
`integral_domain`, `nonzero`, `units`
-/
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {R : Type x}
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
set_option old_structure_cmd true
open function
/-!
### `distrib` class
-/
/-- A typeclass stating that multiplication is left and right distributive
over addition. -/
@[protect_proj, ancestor has_mul has_add]
class distrib (R : Type*) extends has_mul R, has_add R :=
(left_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a * c))
(right_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, (a + b) * c = (a * c) + (b * c))
lemma left_distrib [distrib R] (a b c : R) : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
distrib.left_distrib a b c
alias left_distrib ← mul_add
lemma right_distrib [distrib R] (a b c : R) : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
distrib.right_distrib a b c
alias right_distrib ← add_mul
/-- Pullback a `distrib` instance along an injective function. -/
protected def function.injective.distrib {S} [has_mul R] [has_add R] [distrib S]
(f : R → S) (hf : injective f) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
distrib R :=
{ mul := (*),
add := (+),
left_distrib := λ x y z, hf $ by simp only [*, left_distrib],
right_distrib := λ x y z, hf $ by simp only [*, right_distrib] }
/-- Pushforward a `distrib` instance along a surjective function. -/
protected def function.surjective.distrib {S} [distrib R] [has_add S] [has_mul S]
(f : R → S) (hf : surjective f) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
distrib S :=
{ mul := (*),
add := (+),
left_distrib := hf.forall₃.2 $ λ x y z, by simp only [← add, ← mul, left_distrib],
right_distrib := hf.forall₃.2 $ λ x y z, by simp only [← add, ← mul, right_distrib] }
/-!
### Semirings
-/
@[protect_proj, ancestor add_comm_monoid monoid_with_zero distrib]
class semiring (α : Type u) extends add_comm_monoid α, monoid_with_zero α, distrib α
section semiring
variables [semiring α]
/-- Pullback a `semiring` instance along an injective function. -/
protected def function.injective.semiring [has_zero β] [has_one β] [has_add β] [has_mul β]
(f : β → α) (hf : injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
semiring β :=
{ .. hf.monoid_with_zero f zero one mul, .. hf.add_comm_monoid f zero add,
.. hf.distrib f add mul }
/-- Pullback a `semiring` instance along an injective function. -/
protected def function.surjective.semiring [has_zero β] [has_one β] [has_add β] [has_mul β]
(f : α → β) (hf : surjective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
semiring β :=
{ .. hf.monoid_with_zero f zero one mul, .. hf.add_comm_monoid f zero add,
.. hf.distrib f add mul }
lemma one_add_one_eq_two : 1 + 1 = (2 : α) :=
by unfold bit0
theorem two_mul (n : α) : 2 * n = n + n :=
eq.trans (right_distrib 1 1 n) (by simp)
lemma distrib_three_right (a b c d : α) : (a + b + c) * d = a * d + b * d + c * d :=
by simp [right_distrib]
theorem mul_two (n : α) : n * 2 = n + n :=
(left_distrib n 1 1).trans (by simp)
theorem bit0_eq_two_mul (n : α) : bit0 n = 2 * n :=
(two_mul _).symm
@[to_additive] lemma mul_ite {α} [has_mul α] (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a b c : α) :
a * (if P then b else c) = if P then a * b else a * c :=
by split_ifs; refl
@[to_additive] lemma ite_mul {α} [has_mul α] (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a b c : α) :
(if P then a else b) * c = if P then a * c else b * c :=
by split_ifs; refl
-- We make `mul_ite` and `ite_mul` simp lemmas,
-- but not `add_ite` or `ite_add`.
-- The problem we're trying to avoid is dealing with
-- summations of the form `∑ x in s, (f x + ite P 1 0)`,
-- in which `add_ite` followed by `sum_ite` would needlessly slice up
-- the `f x` terms according to whether `P` holds at `x`.
-- There doesn't appear to be a corresponding difficulty so far with
-- `mul_ite` and `ite_mul`.
attribute [simp] mul_ite ite_mul
@[simp] lemma mul_boole {α} [semiring α] (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a : α) :
a * (if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 0 :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma boole_mul {α} [semiring α] (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a : α) :
(if P then 1 else 0) * a = if P then a else 0 :=
by simp
lemma ite_mul_zero_left {α : Type*} [mul_zero_class α] (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a b : α) :
ite P (a * b) 0 = ite P a 0 * b :=
by { by_cases h : P; simp [h], }
lemma ite_mul_zero_right {α : Type*} [mul_zero_class α] (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a b : α) :
ite P (a * b) 0 = a * ite P b 0 :=
by { by_cases h : P; simp [h], }
end semiring
namespace add_monoid_hom
/-- Left multiplication by an element of a (semi)ring is an `add_monoid_hom` -/
def mul_left {R : Type*} [semiring R] (r : R) : R →+ R :=
{ to_fun := (*) r,
map_zero' := mul_zero r,
map_add' := mul_add r }
@[simp] lemma coe_mul_left {R : Type*} [semiring R] (r : R) : ⇑(mul_left r) = (*) r := rfl
/-- Right multiplication by an element of a (semi)ring is an `add_monoid_hom` -/
def mul_right {R : Type*} [semiring R] (r : R) : R →+ R :=
{ to_fun := λ a, a * r,
map_zero' := zero_mul r,
map_add' := λ _ _, add_mul _ _ r }
@[simp] lemma mul_right_apply {R : Type*} [semiring R] (a r : R) :
(mul_right r : R → R) a = a * r := rfl
end add_monoid_hom
/-- Bundled semiring homomorphisms; use this for bundled ring homomorphisms too. -/
structure ring_hom (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [semiring α] [semiring β]
extends monoid_hom α β, add_monoid_hom α β
infixr ` →+* `:25 := ring_hom
@[priority 1000]
instance {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {rα : semiring α} {rβ : semiring β} : has_coe_to_fun (α →+* β) :=
⟨_, ring_hom.to_fun⟩
@[priority 1000]
instance {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {rα : semiring α} {rβ : semiring β} : has_coe (α →+* β) (α →* β) :=
⟨ring_hom.to_monoid_hom⟩
@[priority 1000]
instance {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {rα : semiring α} {rβ : semiring β} : has_coe (α →+* β) (α →+ β) :=
⟨ring_hom.to_add_monoid_hom⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_monoid_hom {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {rα : semiring α} {rβ : semiring β} (f : α →+* β) :
⇑(f : α →* β) = f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_add_monoid_hom {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {rα : semiring α} {rβ : semiring β} (f : α →+* β) :
⇑(f : α →+ β) = f := rfl
namespace ring_hom
variables [rα : semiring α] [rβ : semiring β]
section
include rα rβ
@[simp]
lemma to_fun_eq_coe (f : α →+* β) : f.to_fun = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (f : α → β) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) : ⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ : α →+* β) = f := rfl
variables (f : α →+* β) {x y : α} {rα rβ}
theorem coe_inj ⦃f g : α →+* β⦄ (h : (f : α → β) = g) : f = g :=
by cases f; cases g; cases h; refl
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃f g : α →+* β⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_inj (funext h)
theorem ext_iff {f g : α →+* β} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨λ h x, h ▸ rfl, λ h, ext h⟩
theorem coe_add_monoid_hom_injective : function.injective (coe : (α →+* β) → (α →+ β)) :=
λ f g h, coe_inj $ show ((f : α →+ β) : α → β) = (g : α →+ β), from congr_arg coe_fn h
theorem coe_monoid_hom_injective : function.injective (coe : (α →+* β) → (α →* β)) :=
λ f g h, coe_inj $ show ((f : α →* β) : α → β) = (g : α →* β), from congr_arg coe_fn h
/-- Ring homomorphisms map zero to zero. -/
@[simp] lemma map_zero (f : α →+* β) : f 0 = 0 := f.map_zero'
/-- Ring homomorphisms map one to one. -/
@[simp] lemma map_one (f : α →+* β) : f 1 = 1 := f.map_one'
/-- Ring homomorphisms preserve addition. -/
@[simp] lemma map_add (f : α →+* β) (a b : α) : f (a + b) = f a + f b := f.map_add' a b
/-- Ring homomorphisms preserve multiplication. -/
@[simp] lemma map_mul (f : α →+* β) (a b : α) : f (a * b) = f a * f b := f.map_mul' a b
end
/-- The identity ring homomorphism from a semiring to itself. -/
def id (α : Type*) [semiring α] : α →+* α :=
by refine {to_fun := id, ..}; intros; refl
include rα
@[simp] lemma id_apply (x : α) : ring_hom.id α x = x := rfl
variable {rγ : semiring γ}
include rβ rγ
/-- Composition of ring homomorphisms is a ring homomorphism. -/
def comp (hnp : β →+* γ) (hmn : α →+* β) : α →+* γ :=
{ to_fun := hnp ∘ hmn,
map_zero' := by simp,
map_one' := by simp,
map_add' := λ x y, by simp,
map_mul' := λ x y, by simp}
/-- Composition of semiring homomorphisms is associative. -/
lemma comp_assoc {δ} {rδ: semiring δ} (f : α →+* β) (g : β →+* γ) (h : γ →+* δ) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_comp (hnp : β →+* γ) (hmn : α →+* β) : (hnp.comp hmn : α → γ) = hnp ∘ hmn := rfl
lemma comp_apply (hnp : β →+* γ) (hmn : α →+* β) (x : α) : (hnp.comp hmn : α → γ) x =
(hnp (hmn x)) := rfl
omit rγ
@[simp] lemma comp_id (f : α →+* β) : f.comp (id α) = f := ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] lemma id_comp (f : α →+* β) : (id β).comp f = f := ext $ λ x, rfl
omit rβ
instance : monoid (α →+* α) :=
{ one := id α,
mul := comp,
mul_one := comp_id,
one_mul := id_comp,
mul_assoc := λ f g h, comp_assoc _ _ _ }
lemma one_def : (1 : α →+* α) = id α := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ⇑(1 : α →+* α) = _root_.id := rfl
lemma mul_def (f g : α →+* α) : f * g = f.comp g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (f g : α →+* α) : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g := rfl
include rβ rγ
lemma cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : β →+* γ} {f : α →+* β} (hf : surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨λ h, ring_hom.ext $ (forall_iff_forall_surj hf).1 (ext_iff.1 h), λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
lemma cancel_left {g : β →+* γ} {f₁ f₂ : α →+* β} (hg : injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨λ h, ring_hom.ext $ λ x, hg $ by rw [← comp_apply, h, comp_apply], λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
omit rα rβ rγ
end ring_hom
@[protect_proj, ancestor semiring comm_monoid]
class comm_semiring (α : Type u) extends semiring α, comm_monoid α
instance comm_semiring.to_comm_monoid_with_zero [comm_semiring α] : comm_monoid_with_zero α :=
{ .. comm_semiring.to_comm_monoid α, .. comm_semiring.to_semiring α }
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring α] [comm_semiring β] {a b c : α}
instance comm_semiring.comm_monoid_with_zero : comm_monoid_with_zero α :=
{ .. (‹_› : comm_semiring α) }
/-- Pullback a `semiring` instance along an injective function. -/
protected def function.injective.comm_semiring [has_zero γ] [has_one γ] [has_add γ] [has_mul γ]
(f : γ → α) (hf : injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
comm_semiring γ :=
{ .. hf.semiring f zero one add mul, .. hf.comm_semigroup f mul }
/-- Pullback a `semiring` instance along an injective function. -/
protected def function.surjective.comm_semiring [has_zero γ] [has_one γ] [has_add γ] [has_mul γ]
(f : α → γ) (hf : surjective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
comm_semiring γ :=
{ .. hf.semiring f zero one add mul, .. hf.comm_semigroup f mul }
lemma add_mul_self_eq (a b : α) : (a + b) * (a + b) = a*a + 2*a*b + b*b :=
calc (a + b)*(a + b) = a*a + (1+1)*a*b + b*b : by simp [add_mul, mul_add, mul_comm, add_assoc]
... = a*a + 2*a*b + b*b : by rw one_add_one_eq_two
instance comm_semiring_has_dvd : has_dvd α :=
has_dvd.mk (λ a b, ∃ c, b = a * c)
-- TODO: this used to not have c explicit, but that seems to be important
-- for use with tactics, similar to exist.intro
theorem dvd.intro (c : α) (h : a * c = b) : a ∣ b :=
exists.intro c h^.symm
alias dvd.intro ← dvd_of_mul_right_eq
theorem dvd.intro_left (c : α) (h : c * a = b) : a ∣ b :=
dvd.intro _ (begin rewrite mul_comm at h, apply h end)
alias dvd.intro_left ← dvd_of_mul_left_eq
theorem exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (h : a ∣ b) : ∃ c, b = a * c := h
theorem dvd.elim {P : Prop} {a b : α} (H₁ : a ∣ b) (H₂ : ∀ c, b = a * c → P) : P :=
exists.elim H₁ H₂
theorem exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (h : a ∣ b) : ∃ c, b = c * a :=
dvd.elim h (assume c, assume H1 : b = a * c, exists.intro c (eq.trans H1 (mul_comm a c)))
theorem dvd.elim_left {P : Prop} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : ∀ c, b = c * a → P) : P :=
exists.elim (exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd h₁) (assume c, assume h₃ : b = c * a, h₂ c h₃)
@[refl, simp] theorem dvd_refl (a : α) : a ∣ a :=
dvd.intro 1 (by simp)
local attribute [simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm
@[trans] theorem dvd_trans (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ c) : a ∣ c :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| ⟨d, (h₃ : b = a * d)⟩, ⟨e, (h₄ : c = b * e)⟩ :=
⟨d * e, show c = a * (d * e), by simp [h₃, h₄]⟩
end
alias dvd_trans ← dvd.trans
theorem eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (h : 0 ∣ a) : a = 0 :=
dvd.elim h (assume c, assume H' : a = 0 * c, eq.trans H' (zero_mul c))
/-- Given an element a of a commutative semiring, there exists another element whose product
with zero equals a iff a equals zero. -/
@[simp] lemma zero_dvd_iff : 0 ∣ a ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_of_zero_dvd, λ h, by rw h⟩
@[simp] theorem dvd_zero (a : α) : a ∣ 0 := dvd.intro 0 (by simp)
@[simp] theorem one_dvd (a : α) : 1 ∣ a := dvd.intro a (by simp)
@[simp] theorem dvd_mul_right (a b : α) : a ∣ a * b := dvd.intro b rfl
@[simp] theorem dvd_mul_left (a b : α) : a ∣ b * a := dvd.intro b (by simp)
theorem dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (h : a ∣ b) (c : α) : a ∣ b * c :=
dvd.elim h (λ d h', begin rw [h', mul_assoc], apply dvd_mul_right end)
theorem dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (h : a ∣ b) (c : α) : a ∣ c * b :=
begin rw mul_comm, exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_left h _ end
theorem mul_dvd_mul : ∀ {a b c d : α}, a ∣ b → c ∣ d → a * c ∣ b * d
| a ._ c ._ ⟨e, rfl⟩ ⟨f, rfl⟩ := ⟨e * f, by simp⟩
theorem mul_dvd_mul_left (a : α) {b c : α} (h : b ∣ c) : a * b ∣ a * c :=
mul_dvd_mul (dvd_refl a) h
theorem mul_dvd_mul_right (h : a ∣ b) (c : α) : a * c ∣ b * c :=
mul_dvd_mul h (dvd_refl c)
theorem dvd_add (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : a ∣ c) : a ∣ b + c :=
dvd.elim h₁ (λ d hd, dvd.elim h₂ (λ e he, dvd.intro (d + e) (by simp [left_distrib, hd, he])))
theorem dvd_of_mul_right_dvd (h : a * b ∣ c) : a ∣ c :=
dvd.elim h (begin intros d h₁, rw [h₁, mul_assoc], apply dvd_mul_right end)
theorem dvd_of_mul_left_dvd (h : a * b ∣ c) : b ∣ c :=
dvd.elim h (λ d ceq, dvd.intro (a * d) (by simp [ceq]))
lemma ring_hom.map_dvd (f : α →+* β) {a b : α} : a ∣ b → f a ∣ f b :=
λ ⟨z, hz⟩, ⟨f z, by rw [hz, f.map_mul]⟩
end comm_semiring
/-!
### Rings
-/
@[protect_proj, ancestor add_comm_group monoid distrib]
class ring (α : Type u) extends add_comm_group α, monoid α, distrib α
section ring
variables [ring α] {a b c d e : α}
instance ring.to_semiring : semiring α :=
{ zero_mul := λ a, add_left_cancel $ show 0 * a + 0 * a = 0 * a + 0,
by rw [← add_mul, zero_add, add_zero],
mul_zero := λ a, add_left_cancel $ show a * 0 + a * 0 = a * 0 + 0,
by rw [← mul_add, add_zero, add_zero],
..‹ring α› }
/- The instance from `ring` to `semiring` happens often in linear algebra, for which all the basic
definitions are given in terms of semirings, but many applications use rings or fields. We increase
a little bit its priority above 100 to try it quickly, but remaining below the default 1000 so that
more specific instances are tried first. -/
attribute [instance, priority 200] ring.to_semiring
/-- Pullback a `ring` instance along an injective function. -/
protected def function.injective.ring [has_zero β] [has_one β] [has_add β] [has_mul β] [has_neg β]
(f : β → α) (hf : injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) :
ring β :=
{ .. hf.add_comm_group f zero add neg, .. hf.monoid f one mul, .. hf.distrib f add mul }
/-- Pullback a `ring` instance along an injective function. -/
protected def function.surjective.ring [has_zero β] [has_one β] [has_add β] [has_mul β] [has_neg β]
(f : α → β) (hf : surjective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) :
ring β :=
{ .. hf.add_comm_group f zero add neg, .. hf.monoid f one mul, .. hf.distrib f add mul }
lemma neg_mul_eq_neg_mul (a b : α) : -(a * b) = -a * b :=
neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero
begin rw [← right_distrib, add_right_neg, zero_mul] end
lemma neg_mul_eq_mul_neg (a b : α) : -(a * b) = a * -b :=
neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero
begin rw [← left_distrib, add_right_neg, mul_zero] end
@[simp] lemma neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm (a b : α) : - a * b = - (a * b) :=
eq.symm (neg_mul_eq_neg_mul a b)
@[simp] lemma mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm (a b : α) : a * - b = - (a * b) :=
eq.symm (neg_mul_eq_mul_neg a b)
lemma neg_mul_neg (a b : α) : -a * -b = a * b :=
by simp
lemma neg_mul_comm (a b : α) : -a * b = a * -b :=
by simp
theorem neg_eq_neg_one_mul (a : α) : -a = -1 * a :=
by simp
lemma mul_sub_left_distrib (a b c : α) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
calc
a * (b - c) = a * b + a * -c : left_distrib a b (-c)
... = a * b - a * c : by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
alias mul_sub_left_distrib ← mul_sub
lemma mul_sub_right_distrib (a b c : α) : (a - b) * c = a * c - b * c :=
calc
(a - b) * c = a * c + -b * c : right_distrib a (-b) c
... = a * c - b * c : by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
alias mul_sub_right_distrib ← sub_mul
/-- An element of a ring multiplied by the additive inverse of one is the element's additive
inverse. -/
lemma mul_neg_one (a : α) : a * -1 = -a := by simp
/-- The additive inverse of one multiplied by an element of a ring is the element's additive
inverse. -/
lemma neg_one_mul (a : α) : -1 * a = -a := by simp
/-- An iff statement following from right distributivity in rings and the definition
of subtraction. -/
theorem mul_add_eq_mul_add_iff_sub_mul_add_eq : a * e + c = b * e + d ↔ (a - b) * e + c = d :=
calc
a * e + c = b * e + d ↔ a * e + c = d + b * e : by simp [add_comm]
... ↔ a * e + c - b * e = d : iff.intro (λ h, begin rw h, simp end) (λ h,
begin rw ← h, simp end)
... ↔ (a - b) * e + c = d : begin simp [sub_mul, sub_add_eq_add_sub] end
/-- A simplification of one side of an equation exploiting right distributivity in rings
and the definition of subtraction. -/
theorem sub_mul_add_eq_of_mul_add_eq_mul_add : a * e + c = b * e + d → (a - b) * e + c = d :=
assume h,
calc
(a - b) * e + c = (a * e + c) - b * e : begin simp [sub_mul, sub_add_eq_add_sub] end
... = d : begin rw h, simp [@add_sub_cancel α] end
end ring
namespace units
variables [ring α] {a b : α}
/-- Each element of the group of units of a ring has an additive inverse. -/
instance : has_neg (units α) := ⟨λu, ⟨-↑u, -↑u⁻¹, by simp, by simp⟩ ⟩
/-- Representing an element of a ring's unit group as an element of the ring commutes with
mapping this element to its additive inverse. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] protected theorem coe_neg (u : units α) : (↑-u : α) = -u := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] protected theorem coe_neg_one : ((-1 : units α) : α) = -1 := rfl
/-- Mapping an element of a ring's unit group to its inverse commutes with mapping this element
to its additive inverse. -/
@[simp] protected theorem neg_inv (u : units α) : (-u)⁻¹ = -u⁻¹ := rfl
/-- An element of a ring's unit group equals the additive inverse of its additive inverse. -/
@[simp] protected theorem neg_neg (u : units α) : - -u = u :=
units.ext $ neg_neg _
/-- Multiplication of elements of a ring's unit group commutes with mapping the first
argument to its additive inverse. -/
@[simp] protected theorem neg_mul (u₁ u₂ : units α) : -u₁ * u₂ = -(u₁ * u₂) :=
units.ext $ neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm _ _
/-- Multiplication of elements of a ring's unit group commutes with mapping the second argument
to its additive inverse. -/
@[simp] protected theorem mul_neg (u₁ u₂ : units α) : u₁ * -u₂ = -(u₁ * u₂) :=
units.ext $ (neg_mul_eq_mul_neg _ _).symm
/-- Multiplication of the additive inverses of two elements of a ring's unit group equals
multiplication of the two original elements. -/
@[simp] protected theorem neg_mul_neg (u₁ u₂ : units α) : -u₁ * -u₂ = u₁ * u₂ := by simp
/-- The additive inverse of an element of a ring's unit group equals the additive inverse of
one times the original element. -/
protected theorem neg_eq_neg_one_mul (u : units α) : -u = -1 * u := by simp
end units
namespace ring_hom
/-- Ring homomorphisms preserve additive inverse. -/
@[simp] theorem map_neg {α β} [ring α] [ring β] (f : α →+* β) (x : α) : f (-x) = -(f x) :=
(f : α →+ β).map_neg x
/-- Ring homomorphisms preserve subtraction. -/
@[simp] theorem map_sub {α β} [ring α] [ring β] (f : α →+* β) (x y : α) :
f (x - y) = (f x) - (f y) := (f : α →+ β).map_sub x y
/-- A ring homomorphism is injective iff its kernel is trivial. -/
theorem injective_iff {α β} [ring α] [ring β] (f : α →+* β) :
function.injective f ↔ (∀ a, f a = 0 → a = 0) :=
(f : α →+ β).injective_iff
/-- Makes a ring homomorphism from a monoid homomorphism of rings which preserves addition. -/
def mk' {γ} [semiring α] [ring γ] (f : α →* γ) (map_add : ∀ a b : α, f (a + b) = f a + f b) :
α →+* γ :=
{ to_fun := f,
.. add_monoid_hom.mk' f map_add, .. f }
end ring_hom
@[protect_proj, ancestor ring comm_semigroup]
class comm_ring (α : Type u) extends ring α, comm_semigroup α
instance comm_ring.to_comm_semiring [s : comm_ring α] : comm_semiring α :=
{ mul_zero := mul_zero, zero_mul := zero_mul, ..s }
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring α] {a b c : α}
/-- Pullback a `ring` instance along an injective function. -/
protected def function.injective.comm_ring [has_zero β] [has_one β] [has_add β] [has_mul β]
[has_neg β] (f : β → α) (hf : injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) :
comm_ring β :=
{ .. hf.ring f zero one add mul neg, .. hf.comm_semigroup f mul }
/-- Pullback a `ring` instance along an injective function. -/
protected def function.surjective.comm_ring [has_zero β] [has_one β] [has_add β] [has_mul β]
[has_neg β] (f : α → β) (hf : surjective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) :
comm_ring β :=
{ .. hf.ring f zero one add mul neg, .. hf.comm_semigroup f mul }
local attribute [simp] add_assoc add_comm add_left_comm mul_comm
lemma mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq (a b : α) : a * a - b * b = (a + b) * (a - b) :=
by simp [right_distrib, left_distrib, sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma mul_self_sub_one_eq (a : α) : a * a - 1 = (a + 1) * (a - 1) :=
by rw [← mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq, mul_one]
theorem dvd_neg_of_dvd (h : a ∣ b) : (a ∣ -b) :=
dvd.elim h
(assume c, assume : b = a * c,
dvd.intro (-c) (by simp [this]))
theorem dvd_of_dvd_neg (h : a ∣ -b) : (a ∣ b) :=
let t := dvd_neg_of_dvd h in by rwa neg_neg at t
theorem dvd_neg_iff_dvd (a b : α) : (a ∣ -b) ↔ (a ∣ b) :=
⟨dvd_of_dvd_neg, dvd_neg_of_dvd⟩
theorem neg_dvd_of_dvd (h : a ∣ b) : -a ∣ b :=
dvd.elim h
(assume c, assume : b = a * c,
dvd.intro (-c) (by simp [this]))
theorem dvd_of_neg_dvd (h : -a ∣ b) : a ∣ b :=
let t := neg_dvd_of_dvd h in by rwa neg_neg at t
theorem neg_dvd_iff_dvd (a b : α) : (-a ∣ b) ↔ (a ∣ b) :=
⟨dvd_of_neg_dvd, neg_dvd_of_dvd⟩
theorem dvd_sub (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : a ∣ c) : a ∣ b - c :=
dvd_add h₁ (dvd_neg_of_dvd h₂)
theorem dvd_add_iff_left (h : a ∣ c) : a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b + c :=
⟨λh₂, dvd_add h₂ h, λH, by have t := dvd_sub H h; rwa add_sub_cancel at t⟩
theorem dvd_add_iff_right (h : a ∣ b) : a ∣ c ↔ a ∣ b + c :=
by rw add_comm; exact dvd_add_iff_left h
/-- Representation of a difference of two squares in a commutative ring as a product. -/
theorem mul_self_sub_mul_self (a b : α) : a * a - b * b = (a + b) * (a - b) :=
by rw [add_mul, mul_sub, mul_sub, mul_comm a b, sub_add_sub_cancel]
/-- An element a of a commutative ring divides the additive inverse of an element b iff a
divides b. -/
@[simp] lemma dvd_neg (a b : α) : (a ∣ -b) ↔ (a ∣ b) :=
⟨dvd_of_dvd_neg, dvd_neg_of_dvd⟩
/-- The additive inverse of an element a of a commutative ring divides another element b iff a
divides b. -/
@[simp] lemma neg_dvd (a b : α) : (-a ∣ b) ↔ (a ∣ b) :=
⟨dvd_of_neg_dvd, neg_dvd_of_dvd⟩
/-- If an element a divides another element c in a commutative ring, a divides the sum of another
element b with c iff a divides b. -/
theorem dvd_add_left (h : a ∣ c) : a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ b :=
(dvd_add_iff_left h).symm
/-- If an element a divides another element b in a commutative ring, a divides the sum of b and
another element c iff a divides c. -/
theorem dvd_add_right (h : a ∣ b) : a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c :=
(dvd_add_iff_right h).symm
/-- An element a divides the sum a + b if and only if a divides b.-/
@[simp] lemma dvd_add_self_left {a b : α} : a ∣ a + b ↔ a ∣ b :=
dvd_add_right (dvd_refl a)
/-- An element a divides the sum b + a if and only if a divides b.-/
@[simp] lemma dvd_add_self_right {a b : α} : a ∣ b + a ↔ a ∣ b :=
dvd_add_left (dvd_refl a)
/-- Vieta's formula for a quadratic equation, relating the coefficients of the polynomial with
its roots. This particular version states that if we have a root `x` of a monic quadratic
polynomial, then there is another root `y` such that `x + y` is negative the `a_1` coefficient
and `x * y` is the `a_0` coefficient. -/
lemma Vieta_formula_quadratic {b c x : α} (h : x * x - b * x + c = 0) :
∃ y : α, y * y - b * y + c = 0 ∧ x + y = b ∧ x * y = c :=
begin
have : c = -(x * x - b * x) := (neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero h).symm,
have : c = x * (b - x), by subst this; simp [mul_sub, mul_comm],
refine ⟨b - x, _, by simp, by rw this⟩,
rw [this, sub_add, ← sub_mul, sub_self]
end
lemma dvd_mul_sub_mul {α : Type*} [comm_ring α]
{k a b x y : α} (hab : k ∣ a - b) (hxy : k ∣ x - y) :
k ∣ a * x - b * y :=
begin
convert dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right hxy a) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left hab y),
rw [mul_sub_left_distrib, mul_sub_right_distrib],
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel_left],
end
lemma dvd_iff_dvd_of_dvd_sub {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {a b c : R}
(h : a ∣ (b - c)) : (a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ c) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h',
convert dvd_sub h' h,
exact eq.symm (sub_sub_self b c) },
{ intro h',
convert dvd_add h h',
exact eq_add_of_sub_eq rfl }
end
end comm_ring
lemma succ_ne_self [ring α] [nontrivial α] (a : α) : a + 1 ≠ a :=
λ h, one_ne_zero ((add_right_inj a).mp (by simp [h]))
lemma pred_ne_self [ring α] [nontrivial α] (a : α) : a - 1 ≠ a :=
λ h, one_ne_zero (neg_injective ((add_right_inj a).mp (by { convert h, simp })))
/-- An element of the unit group of a nonzero semiring represented as an element
of the semiring is nonzero. -/
lemma units.coe_ne_zero [semiring α] [nontrivial α] (u : units α) : (u : α) ≠ 0 :=
λ h : u.1 = 0, by simpa [h, zero_ne_one] using u.3
/-- A domain is a ring with no zero divisors, i.e. satisfying
the condition `a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0`. Alternatively, a domain
is an integral domain without assuming commutativity of multiplication. -/
@[protect_proj] class domain (α : Type u) extends ring α, nontrivial α :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : ∀ a b : α, a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0)
section domain
variable [domain α]
instance domain.to_no_zero_divisors : no_zero_divisors α :=
⟨domain.eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero⟩
instance domain.to_cancel_monoid_with_zero : cancel_monoid_with_zero α :=
{ mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero := λ a b c ha,
by { rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub], simp [ha, sub_eq_zero] },
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero := λ a b c hb,
by { rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_mul], simp [hb, sub_eq_zero] },
.. (infer_instance : semiring α) }
/-- Pullback a `domain` instance along an injective function. -/
protected def function.injective.domain [has_zero β] [has_one β] [has_add β] [has_mul β] [has_neg β]
(f : β → α) (hf : injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) :
domain β :=
{ .. hf.ring f zero one add mul neg, .. pullback_nonzero f zero one,
.. hf.no_zero_divisors f zero mul }
end domain
/-!
### Integral domains
-/
@[protect_proj, ancestor comm_ring domain]
class integral_domain (α : Type u) extends comm_ring α, domain α
section integral_domain
variables [integral_domain α] {a b c d e : α}
/-- Pullback an `integral_domain` instance along an injective function. -/
protected def function.injective.integral_domain [has_zero β] [has_one β] [has_add β]
[has_mul β] [has_neg β] (f : β → α) (hf : injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) :
integral_domain β :=
{ .. hf.comm_ring f zero one add mul neg, .. hf.domain f zero one add mul neg }
lemma mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff {a b : α} : a * a = b * b ↔ a = b ∨ a = -b :=
by rw [← sub_eq_zero, mul_self_sub_mul_self, mul_eq_zero, or_comm, sub_eq_zero,
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
lemma mul_self_eq_one_iff {a : α} : a * a = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∨ a = -1 :=
by rw [← mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff, one_mul]
/-- Given two elements b, c of an integral domain and a nonzero element a, a*b divides a*c iff
b divides c. -/
theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b ∣ a * c ↔ b ∣ c :=
exists_congr $ λ d, by rw [mul_assoc, mul_right_inj' ha]
/-- Given two elements a, b of an integral domain and a nonzero element c, a*c divides b*c iff
a divides b. -/
theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_right (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c ∣ b * c ↔ a ∣ b :=
exists_congr $ λ d, by rw [mul_right_comm, mul_left_inj' hc]
/-- In the unit group of an integral domain, a unit is its own inverse iff the unit is one or
one's additive inverse. -/
lemma units.inv_eq_self_iff (u : units α) : u⁻¹ = u ↔ u = 1 ∨ u = -1 :=
by { rw inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one, simp only [units.ext_iff], push_cast, exact mul_self_eq_one_iff }
end integral_domain
/-!
### Units in various rings
-/
namespace units
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring α] (a b : α) (u : units α)
/-- Elements of the unit group of a commutative semiring represented as elements of the semiring
divide any element of the semiring. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_dvd : ↑u ∣ a := ⟨↑u⁻¹ * a, by simp⟩
/-- In a commutative semiring, an element a divides an element b iff a divides all
associates of b. -/
@[simp] lemma dvd_coe_mul : a ∣ b * u ↔ a ∣ b :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨c, eq⟩, ⟨c * ↑u⁻¹, by rw [← mul_assoc, ← eq, units.mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩)
(assume ⟨c, eq⟩, eq.symm ▸ dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_mul_right _ _) _)
/-- An element of a commutative semiring divides a unit iff the element divides one. -/
@[simp] lemma dvd_coe : a ∣ ↑u ↔ a ∣ 1 :=
suffices a ∣ 1 * ↑u ↔ a ∣ 1, by simpa,
dvd_coe_mul _ _ _
/-- In a commutative semiring, an element a divides an element b iff all associates of a divide b.-/
@[simp] lemma coe_mul_dvd : a * u ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨c, eq⟩, ⟨c * ↑u, eq.symm ▸ by ac_refl⟩)
(assume h, suffices a * ↑u ∣ b * 1, by simpa, mul_dvd_mul h (coe_dvd _ _))
end comm_semiring
end units
namespace is_unit
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R]
lemma mul_right_dvd_of_dvd {a b c : R} (hb : is_unit b) (h : a ∣ c) : a * b ∣ c :=
begin
rcases hb with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
rcases h with ⟨c', rfl⟩,
use (b⁻¹ : units R) * c',
rw [mul_assoc, units.mul_inv_cancel_left]
end
lemma mul_left_dvd_of_dvd {a b c : R} (hb : is_unit b) (h : a ∣ c) : b * a ∣ c :=
begin
rcases hb with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
rcases h with ⟨c', rfl⟩,
use (b⁻¹ : units R) * c',
rw [mul_comm (b : R) a, mul_assoc, units.mul_inv_cancel_left]
end
end comm_semiring
end is_unit
/-- A predicate to express that a ring is an integral domain.
This is mainly useful because such a predicate does not contain data,
and can therefore be easily transported along ring isomorphisms. -/
structure is_integral_domain (R : Type u) [ring R] extends nontrivial R : Prop :=
(mul_comm : ∀ (x y : R), x * y = y * x)
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : ∀ x y : R, x * y = 0 → x = 0 ∨ y = 0)
-- The linter does not recognize that is_integral_domain.to_nontrivial is a structure
-- projection, disable it
attribute [nolint def_lemma doc_blame] is_integral_domain.to_nontrivial
/-- Every integral domain satisfies the predicate for integral domains. -/
lemma integral_domain.to_is_integral_domain (R : Type u) [integral_domain R] :
is_integral_domain R :=
{ .. (‹_› : integral_domain R) }
/-- If a ring satisfies the predicate for integral domains,
then it can be endowed with an `integral_domain` instance
whose data is definitionally equal to the existing data. -/
def is_integral_domain.to_integral_domain (R : Type u) [ring R] (h : is_integral_domain R) :
integral_domain R :=
{ .. (‹_› : ring R), .. (‹_› : is_integral_domain R) }
namespace semiconj_by
@[simp] lemma add_right [distrib R] {a x y x' y' : R}
(h : semiconj_by a x y) (h' : semiconj_by a x' y') :
semiconj_by a (x + x') (y + y') :=
by simp only [semiconj_by, left_distrib, right_distrib, h.eq, h'.eq]
@[simp] lemma add_left [distrib R] {a b x y : R}
(ha : semiconj_by a x y) (hb : semiconj_by b x y) :
semiconj_by (a + b) x y :=
by simp only [semiconj_by, left_distrib, right_distrib, ha.eq, hb.eq]
variables [ring R] {a b x y x' y' : R}
lemma neg_right (h : semiconj_by a x y) : semiconj_by a (-x) (-y) :=
by simp only [semiconj_by, h.eq, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm]
@[simp] lemma neg_right_iff : semiconj_by a (-x) (-y) ↔ semiconj_by a x y :=
⟨λ h, neg_neg x ▸ neg_neg y ▸ h.neg_right, semiconj_by.neg_right⟩
lemma neg_left (h : semiconj_by a x y) : semiconj_by (-a) x y :=
by simp only [semiconj_by, h.eq, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm]
@[simp] lemma neg_left_iff : semiconj_by (-a) x y ↔ semiconj_by a x y :=
⟨λ h, neg_neg a ▸ h.neg_left, semiconj_by.neg_left⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_one_right (a : R) : semiconj_by a (-1) (-1) :=
(one_right a).neg_right
@[simp] lemma neg_one_left (x : R) : semiconj_by (-1) x x :=
(semiconj_by.one_left x).neg_left
@[simp] lemma sub_right (h : semiconj_by a x y) (h' : semiconj_by a x' y') :
semiconj_by a (x - x') (y - y') :=
h.add_right h'.neg_right
@[simp] lemma sub_left (ha : semiconj_by a x y) (hb : semiconj_by b x y) :
semiconj_by (a - b) x y :=
ha.add_left hb.neg_left
end semiconj_by
namespace commute
@[simp] theorem add_right [distrib R] {a b c : R} :
commute a b → commute a c → commute a (b + c) :=
semiconj_by.add_right
@[simp] theorem add_left [distrib R] {a b c : R} :
commute a c → commute b c → commute (a + b) c :=
semiconj_by.add_left
variables [ring R] {a b c : R}
theorem neg_right : commute a b → commute a (- b) := semiconj_by.neg_right
@[simp] theorem neg_right_iff : commute a (-b) ↔ commute a b := semiconj_by.neg_right_iff
theorem neg_left : commute a b → commute (- a) b := semiconj_by.neg_left
@[simp] theorem neg_left_iff : commute (-a) b ↔ commute a b := semiconj_by.neg_left_iff
@[simp] theorem neg_one_right (a : R) : commute a (-1) := semiconj_by.neg_one_right a
@[simp] theorem neg_one_left (a : R): commute (-1) a := semiconj_by.neg_one_left a
@[simp] theorem sub_right : commute a b → commute a c → commute a (b - c) := semiconj_by.sub_right
@[simp] theorem sub_left : commute a c → commute b c → commute (a - b) c := semiconj_by.sub_left
end commute
|
8fb833b3af31a69aa51cb18a5d7fee4e19b6fe7e | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/analysis/inner_product_space/dual.lean | ee9a7b56a03b0882634660e4f3a0c6f2b99fe389 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,145 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import analysis.inner_product_space.projection
import analysis.normed_space.dual
import analysis.normed_space.star.basic
/-!
# The Fréchet-Riesz representation theorem
We consider an inner product space `E` over `𝕜`, which is either `ℝ` or `ℂ`. We define
`to_dual_map`, a conjugate-linear isometric embedding of `E` into its dual, which maps an element
`x` of the space to `λ y, ⟪x, y⟫`.
Under the hypothesis of completeness (i.e., for Hilbert spaces), we upgrade this to `to_dual`, a
conjugate-linear isometric *equivalence* of `E` onto its dual; that is, we establish the
surjectivity of `to_dual_map`. This is the Fréchet-Riesz representation theorem: every element of
the dual of a Hilbert space `E` has the form `λ u, ⟪x, u⟫` for some `x : E`.
For a bounded sesquilinear form `B : E →L⋆[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] 𝕜`,
we define a map `inner_product_space.continuous_linear_map_of_bilin B : E →L[𝕜] E`,
given by substituting `E →L[𝕜] 𝕜` with `E` using `to_dual`.
## References
* [M. Einsiedler and T. Ward, *Functional Analysis, Spectral Theory, and Applications*]
[EinsiedlerWard2017]
## Tags
dual, Fréchet-Riesz
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical complex_conjugate
universes u v
namespace inner_product_space
open is_R_or_C continuous_linear_map
variables (𝕜 : Type*)
variables (E : Type*) [is_R_or_C 𝕜] [inner_product_space 𝕜 E]
local notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner 𝕜 E _ x y
local postfix `†`:90 := star_ring_end _
/--
An element `x` of an inner product space `E` induces an element of the dual space `dual 𝕜 E`,
the map `λ y, ⟪x, y⟫`; moreover this operation is a conjugate-linear isometric embedding of `E`
into `dual 𝕜 E`.
If `E` is complete, this operation is surjective, hence a conjugate-linear isometric equivalence;
see `to_dual`.
-/
def to_dual_map : E →ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] normed_space.dual 𝕜 E :=
{ norm_map' := λ _, innerSL_apply_norm,
..innerSL }
variables {E}
@[simp] lemma to_dual_map_apply {x y : E} : to_dual_map 𝕜 E x y = ⟪x, y⟫ := rfl
lemma innerSL_norm [nontrivial E] : ∥(innerSL : E →L⋆[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] 𝕜)∥ = 1 :=
show ∥(to_dual_map 𝕜 E).to_continuous_linear_map∥ = 1,
from linear_isometry.norm_to_continuous_linear_map _
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜
lemma ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y :=
begin
apply (to_dual_map 𝕜 E).map_eq_iff.mp,
ext v,
rw [to_dual_map_apply, to_dual_map_apply, ←inner_conj_sym],
nth_rewrite_rhs 0 [←inner_conj_sym],
exact congr_arg conj (h v)
end
lemma ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y :=
begin
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 (λ v, _),
rw [←inner_conj_sym],
nth_rewrite_rhs 0 [←inner_conj_sym],
exact congr_arg conj (h v)
end
omit 𝕜
variable {𝕜}
lemma ext_inner_left_basis {ι : Type*} {x y : E} (b : basis ι 𝕜 E)
(h : ∀ i : ι, ⟪b i, x⟫ = ⟪b i, y⟫) : x = y :=
begin
apply (to_dual_map 𝕜 E).map_eq_iff.mp,
refine (function.injective.eq_iff continuous_linear_map.coe_injective).mp (basis.ext b _),
intro i,
simp only [to_dual_map_apply, continuous_linear_map.coe_coe],
rw [←inner_conj_sym],
nth_rewrite_rhs 0 [←inner_conj_sym],
exact congr_arg conj (h i)
end
lemma ext_inner_right_basis {ι : Type*} {x y : E} (b : basis ι 𝕜 E)
(h : ∀ i : ι, ⟪x, b i⟫ = ⟪y, b i⟫) : x = y :=
begin
refine ext_inner_left_basis b (λ i, _),
rw [←inner_conj_sym],
nth_rewrite_rhs 0 [←inner_conj_sym],
exact congr_arg conj (h i)
end
variables (𝕜) (E) [complete_space E]
/--
Fréchet-Riesz representation: any `ℓ` in the dual of a Hilbert space `E` is of the form
`λ u, ⟪y, u⟫` for some `y : E`, i.e. `to_dual_map` is surjective.
-/
def to_dual : E ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] normed_space.dual 𝕜 E :=
linear_isometry_equiv.of_surjective (to_dual_map 𝕜 E)
begin
intros ℓ,
set Y := ker ℓ with hY,
by_cases htriv : Y = ⊤,
{ have hℓ : ℓ = 0,
{ have h' := linear_map.ker_eq_top.mp htriv,
rw [←coe_zero] at h',
apply coe_injective,
exact h' },
exact ⟨0, by simp [hℓ]⟩ },
{ rw [← submodule.orthogonal_eq_bot_iff] at htriv,
change Yᗮ ≠ ⊥ at htriv,
rw [submodule.ne_bot_iff] at htriv,
obtain ⟨z : E, hz : z ∈ Yᗮ, z_ne_0 : z ≠ 0⟩ := htriv,
refine ⟨((ℓ z)† / ⟪z, z⟫) • z, _⟩,
ext x,
have h₁ : (ℓ z) • x - (ℓ x) • z ∈ Y,
{ rw [mem_ker, map_sub, continuous_linear_map.map_smul, continuous_linear_map.map_smul,
algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_comm],
exact sub_self (ℓ x * ℓ z) },
have h₂ : (ℓ z) * ⟪z, x⟫ = (ℓ x) * ⟪z, z⟫,
{ have h₃ := calc
0 = ⟪z, (ℓ z) • x - (ℓ x) • z⟫ : by { rw [(Y.mem_orthogonal' z).mp hz], exact h₁ }
... = ⟪z, (ℓ z) • x⟫ - ⟪z, (ℓ x) • z⟫ : by rw [inner_sub_right]
... = (ℓ z) * ⟪z, x⟫ - (ℓ x) * ⟪z, z⟫ : by simp [inner_smul_right],
exact sub_eq_zero.mp (eq.symm h₃) },
have h₄ := calc
⟪((ℓ z)† / ⟪z, z⟫) • z, x⟫ = (ℓ z) / ⟪z, z⟫ * ⟪z, x⟫
: by simp [inner_smul_left, ring_hom.map_div, conj_conj]
... = (ℓ z) * ⟪z, x⟫ / ⟪z, z⟫
: by rw [←div_mul_eq_mul_div]
... = (ℓ x) * ⟪z, z⟫ / ⟪z, z⟫
: by rw [h₂]
... = ℓ x
: begin
have : ⟪z, z⟫ ≠ 0,
{ change z = 0 → false at z_ne_0,
rwa ←inner_self_eq_zero at z_ne_0 },
field_simp [this]
end,
exact h₄ }
end
variables {𝕜} {E}
@[simp] lemma to_dual_apply {x y : E} : to_dual 𝕜 E x y = ⟪x, y⟫ := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_dual_symm_apply {x : E} {y : normed_space.dual 𝕜 E} :
⟪(to_dual 𝕜 E).symm y, x⟫ = y x :=
begin
rw ← to_dual_apply,
simp only [linear_isometry_equiv.apply_symm_apply],
end
variables {E 𝕜}
/--
Maps a bounded sesquilinear form to its continuous linear map,
given by interpreting the form as a map `B : E →L⋆[𝕜] normed_space.dual 𝕜 E`
and dualizing the result using `to_dual`.
-/
def continuous_linear_map_of_bilin (B : E →L⋆[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] 𝕜) : E →L[𝕜] E :=
comp (to_dual 𝕜 E).symm.to_continuous_linear_equiv.to_continuous_linear_map B
local postfix `♯`:1025 := continuous_linear_map_of_bilin
variables (B : E →L⋆[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] 𝕜)
@[simp]
lemma continuous_linear_map_of_bilin_apply (v w : E) : ⟪(B♯ v), w⟫ = B v w :=
by simp [continuous_linear_map_of_bilin]
lemma unique_continuous_linear_map_of_bilin {v f : E}
(is_lax_milgram : (∀ w, ⟪f, w⟫ = B v w)) :
f = B♯ v :=
begin
refine ext_inner_right 𝕜 _,
intro w,
rw continuous_linear_map_of_bilin_apply,
exact is_lax_milgram w,
end
end inner_product_space
|
aa7e26d2295bd9d42ffe4d2f4c4a30f7c5331f09 | 32fa6b3db8c34b5b2996ed46f2eef23e6cd58023 | /strassen.lean | f4cdf4ecb393d6b773ca130ad2da9b0284343500 | [] | no_license | skbaek/strassen | 3568459f9aa85beb9d3a653e92225bd9518985a5 | 396c94805360b10896d436813c1e4d0190885840 | refs/heads/master | 1,587,522,553,720 | 1,549,860,051,000 | 1,549,860,051,000 | 170,051,087 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,539 | lean | import .matrix
variables {k m n p : nat} {α : Type} [ring α]
open vector
namespace matrix
def halve_rows {k} :
matrix α (2^(k+1)) m →
(matrix α (2^k) m × matrix α (2^k) m) := vector.halve
def halve_cols {k} :
∀ {m}, matrix α m (2^(k+1)) →
( matrix α m (2^k) × matrix α m (2^k) )
| 0 A := (nil,nil)
| (m+1) A :=
let (x₁,x₂) := A.head.halve in
let (A₁,A₂) := halve_cols A.tail in
(cons x₁ A₁, cons x₂ A₂)
def quadrisect {k} (A : matrix α (2^(k+1)) (2^(k+1))) :
( matrix α (2^k) (2^k) × matrix α (2^k) (2^k) ×
matrix α (2^k) (2^k) × matrix α (2^k) (2^k) ) :=
let (A₁,A₂) := halve_rows A in
let (A₁₁,A₁₂) := halve_cols A₁ in
let (A₂₁,A₂₂) := halve_cols A₂ in
(A₁₁,A₁₂,A₂₁,A₂₂)
def double_rows :
(matrix α (2^k) n × matrix α (2^k) n) →
matrix α (2^(k+1)) n := vector.double
def double_cols :
∀ {m}, (matrix α m (2^k) × matrix α m (2^k)) →
matrix α m (2^(k+1))
| 0 ⟨A,B⟩ := nil
| (m+1) ⟨A,B⟩ :=
cons (vector.double (A.head, B.head))
(double_cols ⟨A.tail,B.tail⟩)
def quadruple {k : nat} :
( matrix α (2^k) (2^k) × matrix α (2^k) (2^k) ×
matrix α (2^k) (2^k) × matrix α (2^k) (2^k) ) →
matrix α (2^(k+1)) (2^(k+1))
| ⟨A₁₁,A₁₂,A₂₁,A₂₂⟩ :=
double_rows (double_cols ⟨A₁₁,A₁₂⟩, double_cols ⟨A₂₁,A₂₂⟩)
def strassen (t : nat) :
∀ {k : nat}, matrix α (2^k) (2^k) →
matrix α (2^k) (2^k) → matrix α (2^k) (2^k)
| 0 A B := mul A B
| (k+1) A B :=
if k < t
then mul A B
else
let (A₁₁, A₁₂, A₂₁, A₂₂) := quadrisect A in
let (B₁₁, B₁₂, B₂₁, B₂₂) := quadrisect B in
let S₁ := A₂₁ + A₂₂ in
let S₂ := S₁ - A₁₁ in
let S₃ := A₁₁ - A₂₁ in
let S₄ := A₁₂ - S₂ in
let T₁ := B₁₂ - B₁₁ in
let T₂ := B₂₂ - T₁ in
let T₃ := B₂₂ - B₁₂ in
let T₄ := T₂ - B₂₁ in
let P₁ := strassen A₁₁ B₁₁ in
let P₂ := strassen A₁₂ B₂₁ in
let P₃ := strassen S₄ B₂₂ in
let P₄ := strassen A₂₂ T₄ in
let P₅ := strassen S₁ T₁ in
let P₆ := strassen S₂ T₂ in
let P₇ := strassen S₃ T₃ in
let U₁ := P₁ + P₂ in
let U₂ := P₁ + P₆ in
let U₃ := U₂ + P₇ in
let U₄ := U₂ + P₅ in
let U₅ := U₄ + P₃ in
let U₆ := U₃ - P₄ in
let U₇ := U₃ + P₅ in
quadruple (U₁,U₅,U₆,U₇)
end matrix |
afff697b0f193f93f64a5e2cb1a2ecd70a28d13c | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/init/meta/mk_inhabited_instance.lean | 808c870922b3904862be6a2773876c43c8430a8f | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 623 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
Helper tactic for showing that a type is inhabited.
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.interactive_base
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.contradiction_tactic
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.constructor_tactic
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.injection_tactic
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.relation_tactics
namespace Mathlib
namespace tactic
/- Retrieve the name of the type we are building an inhabitant instance for. -/
|
b18ff180f06f74d85ac6a2ddddf442f8d6ca84ae | 19cc34575500ee2e3d4586c15544632aa07a8e66 | /src/algebra/field_power.lean | 64cadd99cc277b748d4e7ca20281cdfa58c4014e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | LibertasSpZ/mathlib | b9fcd46625eb940611adb5e719a4b554138dade6 | 33f7870a49d7cc06d2f3036e22543e6ec5046e68 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,066,539,347 | 1,602,429,158,000 | 1,602,429,158,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,300 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
Integer power operation on fields.
-/
import algebra.group_with_zero_power
import tactic.linarith
universe u
@[simp] lemma ring_hom.map_fpow {K L : Type*} [division_ring K] [division_ring L] (f : K →+* L) :
∀ (a : K) (n : ℤ), f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n :=
f.to_monoid_hom.map_fpow f.map_zero
section ordered_field_power
open int
variables {K : Type u} [discrete_linear_ordered_field K]
lemma fpow_nonneg_of_nonneg {a : K} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ∀ (z : ℤ), 0 ≤ a ^ z
| (of_nat n) := pow_nonneg ha _
| -[1+n] := inv_nonneg.2 $ pow_nonneg ha _
lemma fpow_pos_of_pos {a : K} (ha : 0 < a) : ∀ (z : ℤ), 0 < a ^ z
| (of_nat n) := pow_pos ha _
| -[1+n] := inv_pos.2 $ pow_pos ha _
lemma fpow_le_of_le {x : K} (hx : 1 ≤ x) {a b : ℤ} (h : a ≤ b) : x ^ a ≤ x ^ b :=
begin
induction a with a a; induction b with b b,
{ simp only [fpow_of_nat, of_nat_eq_coe],
apply pow_le_pow hx,
apply le_of_coe_nat_le_coe_nat h },
{ apply absurd h,
apply not_le_of_gt,
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (neg_succ_lt_zero _) (of_nat_nonneg _) },
{ simp only [fpow_neg_succ_of_nat, one_div],
apply le_trans (inv_le_one _); apply one_le_pow_of_one_le hx },
{ simp only [fpow_neg_succ_of_nat],
apply (inv_le_inv _ _).2,
{ apply pow_le_pow hx,
have : -(↑(a+1) : ℤ) ≤ -(↑(b+1) : ℤ), from h,
have h' := le_of_neg_le_neg this,
apply le_of_coe_nat_le_coe_nat h' },
repeat { apply pow_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx) } }
end
lemma pow_le_max_of_min_le {x : K} (hx : 1 ≤ x) {a b c : ℤ} (h : min a b ≤ c) :
x ^ (-c) ≤ max (x ^ (-a)) (x ^ (-b)) :=
begin
wlog hle : a ≤ b,
have hnle : -b ≤ -a, from neg_le_neg hle,
have hfle : x ^ (-b) ≤ x ^ (-a), from fpow_le_of_le hx hnle,
have : x ^ (-c) ≤ x ^ (-a),
{ apply fpow_le_of_le hx,
simpa only [min_eq_left hle, neg_le_neg_iff] using h },
simpa only [max_eq_left hfle]
end
lemma fpow_le_one_of_nonpos {p : K} (hp : 1 ≤ p) {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≤ 0) : p ^ z ≤ 1 :=
calc p ^ z ≤ p ^ 0 : fpow_le_of_le hp hz
... = 1 : by simp
lemma one_le_fpow_of_nonneg {p : K} (hp : 1 ≤ p) {z : ℤ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ p ^ z :=
calc p ^ z ≥ p ^ 0 : fpow_le_of_le hp hz
... = 1 : by simp
end ordered_field_power
lemma one_lt_pow {K} [linear_ordered_semiring K] {p : K} (hp : 1 < p) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 1 ≤ n → 1 < p ^ n
| 1 h := by simp; assumption
| (k+2) h :=
begin
rw ←one_mul (1 : K),
apply mul_lt_mul,
{ assumption },
{ apply le_of_lt, simpa using one_lt_pow (nat.le_add_left 1 k)},
{ apply zero_lt_one },
{ apply le_of_lt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hp) }
end
section
local attribute [semireducible] int.lt
lemma one_lt_fpow {K} [discrete_linear_ordered_field K] {p : K} (hp : 1 < p) :
∀ z : ℤ, 0 < z → 1 < p ^ z
| (int.of_nat n) h := one_lt_pow hp (nat.succ_le_of_lt (int.lt_of_coe_nat_lt_coe_nat h))
end
section ordered
variables {K : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field K]
lemma nat.fpow_pos_of_pos {p : ℕ} (h : 0 < p) (n:ℤ) : 0 < (p:K)^n :=
by { apply fpow_pos_of_pos, exact_mod_cast h }
lemma nat.fpow_ne_zero_of_pos {p : ℕ} (h : 0 < p) (n:ℤ) : (p:K)^n ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (nat.fpow_pos_of_pos h n)
lemma fpow_strict_mono {x : K} (hx : 1 < x) :
strict_mono (λ n:ℤ, x ^ n) :=
λ m n h, show x ^ m < x ^ n,
begin
have xpos : 0 < x := by linarith,
have h₀ : x ≠ 0 := by linarith,
have hxm : 0 < x^m := fpow_pos_of_pos xpos m,
have hxm₀ : x^m ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hxm,
suffices : 1 < x^(n-m),
{ replace := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right this hxm,
simp [sub_eq_add_neg] at this,
simpa [*, fpow_add, mul_assoc, fpow_neg, inv_mul_cancel], },
apply one_lt_fpow hx, linarith,
end
@[simp] lemma fpow_lt_iff_lt {x : K} (hx : 1 < x) {m n : ℤ} :
x ^ m < x ^ n ↔ m < n :=
(fpow_strict_mono hx).lt_iff_lt
@[simp] lemma fpow_le_iff_le {x : K} (hx : 1 < x) {m n : ℤ} :
x ^ m ≤ x ^ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
(fpow_strict_mono hx).le_iff_le
@[simp] lemma pos_div_pow_pos {a b : K} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (k : ℕ) : 0 < a/b^k :=
div_pos ha (pow_pos hb k)
@[simp] lemma div_pow_le {a b : K} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) (k : ℕ) : a/b^k ≤ a :=
(div_le_iff $ pow_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hb) k).mpr
(calc a = a * 1 : (mul_one a).symm
... ≤ a*b^k : (mul_le_mul_left ha).mpr $ one_le_pow_of_one_le hb _)
lemma fpow_injective {x : K} (h₀ : 0 < x) (h₁ : x ≠ 1) :
function.injective ((^) x : ℤ → K) :=
begin
intros m n h,
rcases lt_trichotomy x 1 with H|rfl|H,
{ apply (fpow_strict_mono (one_lt_inv h₀ H)).injective,
show x⁻¹ ^ m = x⁻¹ ^ n,
rw [← fpow_neg_one, ← fpow_mul, ← fpow_mul, mul_comm _ m, mul_comm _ n, fpow_mul, fpow_mul,
h], },
{ contradiction },
{ exact (fpow_strict_mono H).injective h, },
end
@[simp] lemma fpow_inj {x : K} (h₀ : 0 < x) (h₁ : x ≠ 1) {m n : ℤ} :
x ^ m = x ^ n ↔ m = n :=
(fpow_injective h₀ h₁).eq_iff
end ordered
section
variables {K : Type*} [field K]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem rat.cast_fpow [char_zero K] (q : ℚ) (n : ℤ) :
((q ^ n : ℚ) : K) = q ^ n :=
(rat.cast_hom K).map_fpow q n
end
|
921b9332d18cb5e486a0a5600334c90795bdf7c2 | 05f637fa14ac28031cb1ea92086a0f4eb23ff2b1 | /tests/lean/arith6.lean | 227572837ca0c8019940fd195b848180e6bd43bb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean0.1 | 1ce92751d664aacff0529e139083304a7bbc8a71 | 0dc6fb974aa85ed6f305a2f4b10a53a44ee5f0ef | refs/heads/master | 1,610,830,535,062 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 19,588,851 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 188 | lean | import Int.
set_option pp::unicode false
print 3 | 6
eval 3 | 6
eval 3 | 7
eval 2 | 6
eval 1 | 6
variable x : Int
eval x | 3
eval 3 | x
eval 6 | 3
set_option pp::notation false
print 3 | x |
f56911e808e772063e9e91a43e7a511884731837 | 4e3bf8e2b29061457a887ac8889e88fa5aa0e34c | /lean/love01_definitions_and_lemma_statements_exercise_solution.lean | 273faf91768c8d1c82680f46b53bacf085bb0bcd | [] | no_license | mukeshtiwari/logical_verification_2019 | 9f964c067a71f65eb8884743273fbeef99e6503d | 16f62717f55ed5b7b87e03ae0134791a9bef9b9a | refs/heads/master | 1,619,158,844,208 | 1,585,139,500,000 | 1,585,139,500,000 | 249,906,380 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,585,118,728,000 | 1,585,118,727,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,900 | lean | /- LoVe Exercise 1: Definitions and Lemma Statements -/
/- Replace the placeholders (e.g., `:= sorry`) with your solutions. -/
import .love01_definitions_and_lemma_statements_demo
namespace LoVe
/- Question 1: Fibonacci Numbers -/
/- 1.1. Define the function `fib` that computes the Fibonacci numbers. -/
def fib : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| 1 := 1
| (nat.succ (nat.succ n)) := fib n + fib (nat.succ n)
-- (n + 2) and (n + 1) would also work
/- 1.2. Check that your function works as expected. -/
#reduce fib 0 -- expected: 0
#reduce fib 1 -- expected: 1
#reduce fib 2 -- expected: 1
#reduce fib 3 -- expected: 2
#reduce fib 4 -- expected: 3
#reduce fib 5 -- expected: 5
#reduce fib 6 -- expected: 8
#reduce fib 7 -- expected: 13
#reduce fib 8 -- expected: 21
/- Question 2: Arithmetic Expressions -/
/- Consider the type `aexp` from the lecture. -/
#print aexp
#check eval
/- 2.1. Test that `eval` behaves as expected. Making sure to exercise each
constructor at least once. You can use the following environment in your
tests. What happens if you divide by zero? -/
def some_env : string → ℤ
| "x" := 3
| "y" := 17
| _ := 201
#eval eval some_env (aexp.add (aexp.var "x") (aexp.var "y"))
#eval eval some_env (aexp.sub (aexp.num 5) (aexp.var "y"))
#eval eval some_env (aexp.mul (aexp.num 11) (aexp.var "z"))
#eval eval some_env (aexp.div (aexp.num 2) (aexp.num 0))
/- 2.2. The following function simplifies arithmetic expressions involving
addition. It simplifies `0 + e` and `e + 0` to `e`. Complete the definition so
that it also simplifies expressions involving the other three binary
operators. -/
def simplify : aexp → aexp
| (aexp.add (aexp.num 0) e₂) := simplify e₂
| (aexp.add e₁ (aexp.num 0)) := simplify e₁
| (aexp.sub e₁ (aexp.num 0)) := simplify e₁
| (aexp.mul (aexp.num 0) e₂) := aexp.num 0
| (aexp.mul e₁ (aexp.num 0)) := aexp.num 0
| (aexp.mul (aexp.num 1) e₂) := simplify e₂
| (aexp.mul e₁ (aexp.num 1)) := simplify e₁
| (aexp.div (aexp.num 0) e₂) := aexp.num 0
| (aexp.div e₁ (aexp.num 0)) := aexp.num 0
| (aexp.div e₁ (aexp.num 1)) := simplify e₁
-- catch-all cases below
| (aexp.num i) := aexp.num i
| (aexp.var x) := aexp.var x
| (aexp.add e₁ e₂) := aexp.add (simplify e₁) (simplify e₂)
| (aexp.sub e₁ e₂) := aexp.sub (simplify e₁) (simplify e₂)
| (aexp.mul e₁ e₂) := aexp.mul (simplify e₁) (simplify e₂)
| (aexp.div e₁ e₂) := aexp.div (simplify e₁) (simplify e₂)
/- 2.3. State the correctness lemma for `simplify`, namely that the simplified
expression should have the same semantics, with respect to `eval`, as the
original expression. -/
lemma simplify_correct (env : string → ℤ) (e : aexp) :
eval env (simplify e) = eval env e :=
sorry
/- Question 3: λ-Terms -/
/- We start by declaring three new opaque types. -/
constants α β γ : Type
/- 3.1. Complete the following definitions, by replacing the `sorry` markers by
terms of the expected type.
Hint: You can use `_` as a placeholder while constructing a term. By hovering
over `_`, you will see the current logical context. -/
def I : α → α :=
λa, a
def K : α → β → α :=
λa b, a
def C : (α → β → γ) → β → α → γ :=
λg b a, g a b
def proj_1st : α → α → α :=
λx y, x
-- please give a different answer than for `proj_1st`
def proj_2nd : α → α → α :=
λx y, y
def some_nonsense : (α → β → γ) → α → (α → γ) → β → γ :=
λg a f b, g a b
/- 3.2. Show the typing derivation for your definition of `C` above. -/
/- Let Γ := g : α → β → γ, b : β, a : α. We have
–––––––––––––––––– Var –––––––––– Var
Γ ⊢ g : α → β → γ Γ ⊢ a : α
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– App –––––––––– Var
Γ ⊢ g a : β → γ Γ ⊢ b : β
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– App
Γ ⊢ g a b : γ
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Lam
g : α → β → γ, b : β ⊢ (λa : α, g a b) : γ
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Lam
g : α → β → γ ⊢ (λ(b : β) (a : α), g a b) : γ
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Lam
⊢ (λ(g : α → β → γ) (b : β) (a : α), g a b) : γ
-/
end LoVe
|
2527e027bd75c6658ec67d6275de00dd842adc57 | 99b5e6372af1f404777312358869f95be7de84a3 | /src/hott/function.lean | c29cdb4aa820a22825d7a138786c573556dc3f79 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | forked-from-1kasper/hott3 | 8fa064ab5e8c9d6752a783d74ab226ddc5b5232a | 2db24de7a361a7793b0eae4ca5c3fd4d4a0fc691 | refs/heads/master | 1,584,867,131,028 | 1,530,766,841,000 | 1,530,766,841,000 | 139,797,034 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,530,766,961,000 | 1,530,766,961,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,923 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Floris van Doorn
Ported from Coq HoTT
Theorems about embeddings and surjections
-/
import .hit.trunc .types.equiv .cubical.square .types.nat.hott
universes u v w
hott_theory
namespace hott
open hott.equiv hott.sigma trunc is_trunc hott.pi hott.is_equiv fiber hott.prod pointed hott.nat
variables {A : Type _} {B : Type _} {C : Type _} (f f' : A → B) {b : B}
/- the image of a map is the (-1)-truncated fiber -/
@[hott] def image' (f : A → B) (b : B) : Type _ := ∥ fiber f b ∥
@[hott, instance] def is_prop_image' (f : A → B) (b : B) : is_prop (image' f b) :=
is_trunc_trunc _ _
@[hott] def image (f : A → B) (b : B) : Prop := Prop.mk (image' f b) (by apply_instance)
@[hott] def total_image {A B : Type _} (f : A → B) : Type _ := Σx, image f x
@[hott, class] def is_embedding (f : A → B) := Π(a a' : A), is_equiv (ap f : a = a' → f a = f a')
@[hott, class] def is_surjective (f : A → B) := Π(b : B), image f b
@[hott, class] def is_split_surjective (f : A → B) := Π(b : B), fiber f b
@[hott, class] structure is_retraction (f : A → B) :=
(sect : B → A)
(right_inverse : Π(b : B), f (sect b) = b)
@[hott, class] structure is_section (f : A → B) :=
(retr : B → A)
(left_inverse : Π(a : A), retr (f a) = a)
@[hott, class] def is_weakly_constant (f : A → B) := Π(a a' : A), f a = f a'
@[hott, class] structure is_constant (f : A → B) :=
(pt : B)
(eq : Π(a : A), f a = pt)
@[hott, class] structure is_conditionally_constant (f : A → B) :=
(g : ∥A∥ → B)
(eq : Π(a : A), f a = g (tr a))
section image
@[hott] protected def image.mk {f : A → B} {b : B} (a : A) (p : f a = b)
: image f b :=
tr (fiber.mk a p)
@[hott, induction] protected def image.rec {f : A → B} {b : B} {P : image' f b → Type _}
[HP : Πv, is_prop (P v)] (H : Π(a : A) (p : f a = b), P (image.mk a p)) (v : image' f b) : P v :=
begin dsimp [image'] at *, hinduction v with v, hinduction v with a p, exact H a p end
@[hott] def image.elim {A B : Type _} {f : A → B} {C : Type _} [is_prop C] {b : B}
(H : image f b) (H' : ∀ (a : A), f a = b → C) : C :=
begin
refine (trunc.elim _ H),
intro H'', cases H'' with a Ha, exact H' a Ha
end
@[hott] def image.equiv_exists {A B : Type _} {f : A → B} {b : B} : image f b ≃ ∃a, f a = b :=
trunc_equiv_trunc _ (fiber.sigma_char _ _)
@[hott] def image_pathover {f : A → B} {x y : B} (p : x = y) (u : image f x) (v : image f y) :
u =[p; λb, image f b] v :=
is_prop.elimo _ _ _
@[hott] def total_image.rec
{A B : Type _} {f : A → B} {C : total_image f → Type _} [H : Πx, is_prop (C x)]
(g : Πa, C ⟨f a, image.mk a idp⟩)
(x : total_image f) : C x :=
begin
induction x with b v,
refine @image.rec _ _ _ _ _ (λv, H ⟨b, v⟩) _ v,
intros a p,
induction p, exact g a
end
/- total_image.elim_set is in hit.prop_trunc to avoid dependency cycle -/
end image
namespace function
abbreviation sect := @is_retraction.sect
abbreviation right_inverse := @is_retraction.right_inverse
abbreviation retr := @is_section.retr
abbreviation left_inverse := @is_section.left_inverse
@[hott, instance] def is_equiv_ap_of_embedding [H : is_embedding f] (a a' : A)
: is_equiv (ap f : a = a' → f a = f a') :=
H a a'
@[hott] def ap_inv_idp {a : A} {H : is_equiv (ap f : a = a → f a = f a)}
: (ap f)⁻¹ᶠ idp = idp :> a = a :=
left_inv (ap f) idp
variable {f}
@[hott, reducible] def is_injective_of_is_embedding [H : is_embedding f] {a a' : A}
: f a = f a' → a = a' :=
(ap f)⁻¹ᶠ
@[hott] def is_embedding_of_is_injective [HA : is_set A] [HB : is_set B]
(H : Π(a a' : A), f a = f a' → a = a') : is_embedding f :=
begin
intros a a',
fapply adjointify,
{exact (H a a')},
{intro p, apply is_set.elim},
{intro p, apply is_set.elim}
end
variable (f)
@[hott, instance] def is_prop_is_embedding : is_prop (is_embedding f) :=
by dsimp [is_embedding]; apply_instance
@[hott] def is_embedding_equiv_is_injective [HA : is_set A] [HB : is_set B]
: is_embedding f ≃ (Π(a a' : A), f a = f a' → a = a') :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ apply @is_injective_of_is_embedding},
{ apply is_embedding_of_is_injective},
{ intro H, apply is_prop.elim},
{ intro H, apply is_prop.elim, }
end
@[hott] def is_prop_fiber_of_is_embedding [H : is_embedding f] (b : B) :
is_prop (fiber f b) :=
begin
apply is_prop.mk, intros v w,
induction v with a p, induction w with a' q, induction q,
fapply fiber_eq,
{ apply is_injective_of_is_embedding p},
{ dsimp [is_injective_of_is_embedding], symmetry, apply right_inv}
end
@[hott] def is_prop_fun_of_is_embedding [H : is_embedding f] : is_trunc_fun -1 f :=
is_prop_fiber_of_is_embedding f
@[hott] def is_embedding_of_is_prop_fun [H : is_trunc_fun -1 f] : is_embedding f :=
begin
intros a a', fapply adjointify,
{ intro p, exact ap point (@is_prop.elim (fiber f (f a')) _ (fiber.mk a p) (fiber.mk a' idp))},
{ intro p, rwr [←ap_compose],
exact ap_con_eq (@point_eq _ _ f (f a')) (is_prop.elim ⟨a, p⟩ ⟨a', idp⟩) },
{ intro p, induction p, apply ap02 point (is_prop_elim_self _) }
end
variable {f}
@[hott] def is_surjective_rec_on {P : Type _} (H : is_surjective f) (b : B) [Pt : is_prop P]
(IH : fiber f b → P) : P :=
trunc.rec_on (H b) IH
variable (f)
@[hott, instance] def is_surjective_of_is_split_surjective [H : is_split_surjective f]
: is_surjective f :=
λb, tr (H b)
@[hott, instance] def is_prop_is_surjective : is_prop (is_surjective f) :=
begin unfold is_surjective, apply_instance end
@[hott] def is_surjective_cancel_right {A B C : Type _} (g : B → C) (f : A → B)
[H : is_surjective (g ∘ f)] : is_surjective g :=
begin
intro c,
have := H c,
hinduction H c with q p, hinduction p with a p,
exact tr (fiber.mk (f a) p)
end
@[hott, instance] def is_weakly_constant_ap [H : is_weakly_constant f] (a a' : A) :
is_weakly_constant (ap f : a = a' → f a = f a') :=
λp q : a = a',
have Π{b c : A} {r : b = c}, (H a b)⁻¹ ⬝ H a c = ap f r, from
(λb c r, by hinduction r; apply con.left_inv),
this⁻¹ ⬝ this
@[hott, instance] def is_constant_ap [H : is_constant f] (a a' : A)
: is_constant (ap f : a = a' → f a = f a') :=
begin
unfreezeI; induction H with b q,
fapply is_constant.mk,
{ exact q a ⬝ (q a')⁻¹},
{ intro p, induction p, exact (con.right_inv _)⁻¹}
end
@[hott, instance] def is_contr_is_retraction [H : is_equiv f] : is_contr (is_retraction f) :=
begin
have H2 : (Σ(g : B → A), Πb, f (g b) = b) ≃ is_retraction f,
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{intro x, induction x with g p, constructor, exact p},
{intro h, induction h, apply sigma.mk, assumption},
{intro h, induction h, reflexivity},
{intro x, induction x, reflexivity},
end,
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed, exact H2,
apply is_equiv.is_contr_right_inverse
end
@[hott, instance] def is_contr_is_section [H : is_equiv f] : is_contr (is_section f) :=
begin
have H2 : (Σ(g : B → A), Πa, g (f a) = a) ≃ is_section f,
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{intro x, induction x with g p, constructor, exact p},
{intro h, induction h with h hp, apply sigma.mk, exact hp },
{intro h, induction h, reflexivity},
{intro x, induction x, reflexivity},
end,
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed, exact H2,
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed,
{apply sigma_equiv_sigma_right, intro g, apply eq_equiv_homotopy (g ∘ f) id},
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed,
{apply fiber.sigma_char},
apply is_contr_fiber_of_is_equiv _,
exact to_is_equiv (arrow_equiv_arrow_left_rev A (equiv.mk f H)),
end
@[hott, instance] def is_embedding_of_is_equiv [H : is_equiv f] : is_embedding f :=
λa a', by apply_instance
@[hott] def is_equiv_of_is_surjective_of_is_embedding
[H : is_embedding f] [H' : is_surjective f] : is_equiv f :=
@is_equiv_of_is_contr_fun _ _ _
(λb, is_surjective_rec_on H' b
(λa, is_contr.mk a
(λa',
fiber_eq ((ap f)⁻¹ᶠ ((point_eq a) ⬝ (point_eq a')⁻¹))
(by rwr (right_inv (ap f)); rwr inv_con_cancel_right))))
@[hott] def is_split_surjective_of_is_retraction [H : is_retraction f] : is_split_surjective f :=
λb, fiber.mk (sect f b) (right_inverse f b)
@[hott, instance] def is_constant_compose_point (b : B)
: is_constant (f ∘ point : fiber f b → B) :=
is_constant.mk b (λv, by induction v with a p;exact p)
@[hott] def is_embedding_of_is_prop_fiber [H : Π(b : B), is_prop (fiber f b)] : is_embedding f :=
is_embedding_of_is_prop_fun _
@[hott, instance] def is_retraction_of_is_equiv [H : is_equiv f] : is_retraction f :=
is_retraction.mk f⁻¹ᶠ (right_inv f)
@[hott, instance] def is_section_of_is_equiv [H : is_equiv f] : is_section f :=
is_section.mk f⁻¹ᶠ (left_inv f)
@[hott] def is_equiv_of_is_section_of_is_retraction [H1 : is_retraction f] [H2 : is_section f]
: is_equiv f :=
let g := sect f in let h := retr f in
adjointify f
g
(right_inverse f)
(λa, calc
g (f a) = h (f (g (f a))) : (left_inverse _ _)⁻¹
... = h (f a) : by rwr right_inverse f _
... = a : left_inverse _ _)
section
local attribute [instance] [priority 10000] is_equiv_of_is_section_of_is_retraction
--local attribute [instance] [priority 1] trunctype.struct -- remove after #842 is closed
variable (f)
@[hott] def is_prop_is_retraction_prod_is_section : is_prop (is_retraction f × is_section f) :=
begin
apply is_prop_of_imp_is_contr, intro H, induction H with H1 H2,
resetI, apply_instance,
end
end
@[hott, instance] def is_retraction_trunc_functor (r : A → B) [H : is_retraction r]
(n : trunc_index) : is_retraction (trunc_functor n r) :=
is_retraction.mk
(trunc_functor n (sect r))
(λb,
((trunc_functor_compose n r (sect r)) b)⁻¹
⬝ trunc_homotopy n (right_inverse r) b
⬝ trunc_functor_id n B b)
-- @[hott] lemma 3.11.7
@[hott] def is_contr_retract (r : A → B) [H : is_retraction r] : is_contr A → is_contr B :=
begin
intro CA,
applyI is_contr.mk (r (center A)),
intro b,
exact ap r (center_eq (is_retraction.sect r b)) ⬝ (is_retraction.right_inverse r b)
end
local attribute [instance] is_prop_is_retraction_prod_is_section
@[hott] def is_retraction_prod_is_section_equiv_is_equiv
: (is_retraction f × is_section f) ≃ is_equiv f :=
begin
apply equiv_of_is_prop,
intro H, induction H, apply is_equiv_of_is_section_of_is_retraction _; assumption,
intro H, resetI, split, apply_instance, apply_instance
end
@[hott] def is_retraction_equiv_is_split_surjective :
is_retraction f ≃ is_split_surjective f :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro H, induction H with g p, intro b, constructor, exact p b},
{ intro H, constructor, intro b, exact point_eq (H b)},
{ intro H, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b, dsimp,
hinduction H b with q a p, refl },
{ intro H, induction H with g p, reflexivity},
end
@[hott] def is_embedding_compose (g : B → C) (f : A → B)
(H₁ : is_embedding g) (H₂ : is_embedding f) : is_embedding (g ∘ f) :=
begin
intros a a', apply is_equiv.homotopy_closed (ap g ∘ ap f),
symmetry, exact ap_compose g f,
apply is_equiv_compose,
end
@[hott] def is_surjective_compose (g : B → C) (f : A → B)
(H₁ : is_surjective g) (H₂ : is_surjective f) : is_surjective (g ∘ f) :=
begin
intro c, hinduction H₁ c with x p, hinduction p with b p,
hinduction H₂ b with y q, hinduction q with a q,
exact image.mk a (ap g q ⬝ p)
end
@[hott] def is_split_surjective_compose (g : B → C) (f : A → B)
(H₁ : is_split_surjective g) (H₂ : is_split_surjective f) : is_split_surjective (g ∘ f) :=
begin
intro c, hinduction H₁ c with x b p, hinduction H₂ b with y a q,
exact fiber.mk a (ap g q ⬝ p)
end
@[hott] def is_injective_compose (g : B → C) (f : A → B)
(H₁ : Π⦃b b'⦄, g b = g b' → b = b') (H₂ : Π⦃a a'⦄, f a = f a' → a = a')
⦃a a' : A⦄ (p : g (f a) = g (f a')) : a = a' :=
H₂ (H₁ p)
@[hott, instance] def is_embedding_pr1 {A : Type _} (B : A → Type _) [H : Π a, is_prop (B a)]
: is_embedding (@sigma.fst A B) :=
λv v', to_is_equiv (sigma_eq_equiv v v' ⬝e sigma_equiv_of_is_contr_right _)
variables {f f'}
@[hott] def is_embedding_homotopy_closed (p : f ~ f') (H : is_embedding f) : is_embedding f' :=
begin
intros a a', fapply is_equiv_of_equiv_of_homotopy,
exact equiv.mk (ap f) (by apply_instance) ⬝e
equiv_eq_closed_left _ (p a) ⬝e equiv_eq_closed_right _ (p a'),
intro q, exact (eq_bot_of_square (transpose (natural_square p q)))⁻¹
end
@[hott] def is_embedding_homotopy_closed_rev (p : f' ~ f) (H : is_embedding f) : is_embedding f' :=
is_embedding_homotopy_closed p⁻¹ʰᵗʸ H
@[hott] def is_surjective_homotopy_closed (p : f ~ f') (H : is_surjective f) : is_surjective f' :=
begin
intro b, hinduction H b with x q, hinduction q with a q,
exact image.mk a ((p a)⁻¹ ⬝ q)
end
@[hott] def is_surjective_homotopy_closed_rev (p : f' ~ f) (H : is_surjective f) :
is_surjective f' :=
is_surjective_homotopy_closed p⁻¹ʰᵗʸ H
@[hott] def is_equiv_ap1_gen_of_is_embedding {A B : Type _} (f : A → B) [is_embedding f]
{a a' : A} {b b' : B} (q : f a = b) (q' : f a' = b') : is_equiv (ap1_gen f q q') :=
begin
induction q, induction q',
exact is_equiv.homotopy_closed _ (ap1_gen_idp_left f)⁻¹ʰᵗʸ,
end
@[hott] def is_equiv_ap1_of_is_embedding {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) [is_embedding f] :
is_equiv (Ω→ f) :=
is_equiv_ap1_gen_of_is_embedding f (respect_pt f) (respect_pt f)
@[hott] def loop_pequiv_loop_of_is_embedding {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B)
[is_embedding f] : Ω A ≃* Ω B :=
pequiv_of_pmap (Ω→ f) (is_equiv_ap1_of_is_embedding f)
@[hott] def loopn_pequiv_loopn_of_is_embedding (n : ℕ) [H : is_succ n]
{A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) [is_embedding f] : Ω[n] A ≃* Ω[n] B :=
begin
unfreezeI, induction H with n,
exact loopn_succ_in _ _ ⬝e*
loopn_pequiv_loopn n (loop_pequiv_loop_of_is_embedding f) ⬝e*
(loopn_succ_in _ _)⁻¹ᵉ*
end
/-
The definitions
is_surjective_of_is_equiv
is_equiv_equiv_is_embedding_times_is_surjective
are in types.trunc
See types.arrow_2 for retractions
-/
end function
end hott |
f9afe8711efe65dbf0a7fb358ff65c976955a3a5 | 1dd482be3f611941db7801003235dc84147ec60a | /src/topology/instances/real.lean | 9639d7c1edcda34a9d62b2de38c8109aa4a43df0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sanderdahmen/mathlib | 479039302bd66434bb5672c2a4cecf8d69981458 | 8f0eae75cd2d8b7a083cf935666fcce4565df076 | refs/heads/master | 1,587,491,322,775 | 1,549,672,060,000 | 1,549,672,060,000 | 169,748,224 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,549,636,694,000 | 1,549,636,694,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,236 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
The real numbers ℝ.
They are constructed as the topological completion of ℚ. With the following steps:
(1) prove that ℚ forms a uniform space.
(2) subtraction and addition are uniform continuous functions in this space
(3) for multiplication and inverse this only holds on bounded subsets
(4) ℝ is defined as separated Cauchy filters over ℚ (the separation requires a quotient construction)
(5) extend the uniform continuous functions along the completion
(6) proof field properties using the principle of extension of identities
TODO
generalizations:
* topological groups & rings
* order topologies
* Archimedean fields
-/
import logic.function topology.metric_space.basic tactic.linarith
noncomputable theory
open classical set lattice filter topological_space metric
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
instance : metric_space ℚ :=
metric_space.induced coe rat.cast_injective real.metric_space
theorem rat.dist_eq (x y : ℚ) : dist x y = abs (x - y) := rfl
instance : metric_space ℤ :=
begin
letI M := metric_space.induced coe int.cast_injective real.metric_space,
refine @metric_space.replace_uniformity _ int.uniform_space M
(le_antisymm refl_le_uniformity $ λ r ru,
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ a b h,
mem_principal_sets.1 ru $ dist_le_zero.1 (_ : (abs (a - b) : ℝ) ≤ 0)⟩),
simpa using (@int.cast_le ℝ _ _ 0).2 (int.lt_add_one_iff.1 $
(@int.cast_lt ℝ _ (abs (a - b)) 1).1 $ by simpa using h)
end
theorem uniform_continuous_of_rat : uniform_continuous (coe : ℚ → ℝ) :=
uniform_continuous_comap
theorem uniform_embedding_of_rat : uniform_embedding (coe : ℚ → ℝ) :=
uniform_embedding_comap rat.cast_injective
theorem dense_embedding_of_rat : dense_embedding (coe : ℚ → ℝ) :=
uniform_embedding_of_rat.dense_embedding $
λ x, mem_closure_iff_nhds.2 $ λ t ht,
let ⟨ε,ε0, hε⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.1 ht in
let ⟨q, h⟩ := exists_rat_near x ε0 in
ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.2 ⟨_, hε (mem_ball'.2 h), q, rfl⟩
theorem embedding_of_rat : embedding (coe : ℚ → ℝ) := dense_embedding_of_rat.embedding
theorem continuous_of_rat : continuous (coe : ℚ → ℝ) := uniform_continuous_of_rat.continuous
theorem real.uniform_continuous_add : uniform_continuous (λp : ℝ × ℝ, p.1 + p.2) :=
metric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 $ λ ε ε0,
let ⟨δ, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_add_continuous_lemma abs ε0 in
⟨δ, δ0, λ a b h, let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := max_lt_iff.1 h in Hδ h₁ h₂⟩
-- TODO(Mario): Find a way to use rat_add_continuous_lemma
theorem rat.uniform_continuous_add : uniform_continuous (λp : ℚ × ℚ, p.1 + p.2) :=
uniform_embedding_of_rat.uniform_continuous_iff.2 $ by simp [(∘)]; exact
((uniform_continuous_fst.comp uniform_continuous_of_rat).prod_mk
(uniform_continuous_snd.comp uniform_continuous_of_rat)).comp real.uniform_continuous_add
theorem real.uniform_continuous_neg : uniform_continuous (@has_neg.neg ℝ _) :=
metric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 $ λ ε ε0, ⟨_, ε0, λ a b h,
by rw dist_comm at h; simpa [real.dist_eq] using h⟩
theorem rat.uniform_continuous_neg : uniform_continuous (@has_neg.neg ℚ _) :=
metric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 $ λ ε ε0, ⟨_, ε0, λ a b h,
by rw dist_comm at h; simpa [rat.dist_eq] using h⟩
instance : uniform_add_group ℝ :=
uniform_add_group.mk' real.uniform_continuous_add real.uniform_continuous_neg
instance : uniform_add_group ℚ :=
uniform_add_group.mk' rat.uniform_continuous_add rat.uniform_continuous_neg
instance : topological_add_group ℝ := by apply_instance
instance : topological_add_group ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : orderable_topology ℚ :=
induced_orderable_topology _ (λ x y, rat.cast_lt) (@exists_rat_btwn _ _ _)
lemma real.is_topological_basis_Ioo_rat :
@is_topological_basis ℝ _ (⋃(a b : ℚ) (h : a < b), {Ioo a b}) :=
is_topological_basis_of_open_of_nhds
(by simp [is_open_Ioo] {contextual:=tt})
(assume a v hav hv,
let ⟨l, u, hl, hu, h⟩ := (mem_nhds_unbounded (no_top _) (no_bot _)).mp (mem_nhds_sets hv hav),
⟨q, hlq, hqa⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hl,
⟨p, hap, hpu⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hu in
⟨Ioo q p,
by simp; exact ⟨q, p, rat.cast_lt.1 $ lt_trans hqa hap, rfl⟩,
⟨hqa, hap⟩, assume a' ⟨hqa', ha'p⟩, h _ (lt_trans hlq hqa') (lt_trans ha'p hpu)⟩)
instance : second_countable_topology ℝ :=
⟨⟨(⋃(a b : ℚ) (h : a < b), {Ioo a b}),
by simp [countable_Union, countable_Union_Prop],
real.is_topological_basis_Ioo_rat.2.2⟩⟩
/- TODO(Mario): Prove that these are uniform isomorphisms instead of uniform embeddings
lemma uniform_embedding_add_rat {r : ℚ} : uniform_embedding (λp:ℚ, p + r) :=
_
lemma uniform_embedding_mul_rat {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : uniform_embedding ((*) q) :=
_ -/
lemma real.uniform_continuous_inv (s : set ℝ) {r : ℝ} (r0 : 0 < r) (H : ∀ x ∈ s, r ≤ abs x) :
uniform_continuous (λp:s, p.1⁻¹) :=
metric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 $ λ ε ε0,
let ⟨δ, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_inv_continuous_lemma abs ε0 r0 in
⟨δ, δ0, λ a b h, Hδ (H _ a.2) (H _ b.2) h⟩
lemma real.uniform_continuous_abs : uniform_continuous (abs : ℝ → ℝ) :=
metric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 $ λ ε ε0,
⟨ε, ε0, λ a b, lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub _ _)⟩
lemma real.continuous_abs : continuous (abs : ℝ → ℝ) :=
real.uniform_continuous_abs.continuous
lemma rat.uniform_continuous_abs : uniform_continuous (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
metric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 $ λ ε ε0,
⟨ε, ε0, λ a b h, lt_of_le_of_lt
(by simpa [rat.dist_eq] using abs_abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub _ _) h⟩
lemma rat.continuous_abs : continuous (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
rat.uniform_continuous_abs.continuous
lemma real.tendsto_inv {r : ℝ} (r0 : r ≠ 0) : tendsto (λq, q⁻¹) (nhds r) (nhds r⁻¹) :=
by rw ← abs_pos_iff at r0; exact
tendsto_of_uniform_continuous_subtype
(real.uniform_continuous_inv {x | abs r / 2 < abs x} (half_pos r0) (λ x h, le_of_lt h))
(mem_nhds_sets (real.continuous_abs _ $ is_open_lt' (abs r / 2)) (half_lt_self r0))
lemma real.continuous_inv' : continuous (λa:{r:ℝ // r ≠ 0}, a.val⁻¹) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $ assume ⟨r, hr⟩,
(continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp continuous_subtype_val _).comp (real.tendsto_inv hr)
lemma real.continuous_inv [topological_space α] {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∀a, f a ≠ 0) (hf : continuous f) :
continuous (λa, (f a)⁻¹) :=
show continuous ((has_inv.inv ∘ @subtype.val ℝ (λr, r ≠ 0)) ∘ λa, ⟨f a, h a⟩),
from (continuous_subtype_mk _ hf).comp real.continuous_inv'
lemma real.uniform_continuous_mul_const {x : ℝ} : uniform_continuous ((*) x) :=
metric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 $ λ ε ε0, begin
cases no_top (abs x) with y xy,
have y0 := lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_nonneg _) xy,
refine ⟨_, div_pos ε0 y0, λ a b h, _⟩,
rw [real.dist_eq, ← mul_sub, abs_mul, ← mul_div_cancel' ε (ne_of_gt y0)],
exact mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt xy) h (abs_nonneg _) y0
end
lemma real.uniform_continuous_mul (s : set (ℝ × ℝ))
{r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (r₁0 : 0 < r₁) (r₂0 : 0 < r₂)
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, abs (x : ℝ × ℝ).1 < r₁ ∧ abs x.2 < r₂) :
uniform_continuous (λp:s, p.1.1 * p.1.2) :=
metric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 $ λ ε ε0,
let ⟨δ, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_mul_continuous_lemma abs ε0 r₁0 r₂0 in
⟨δ, δ0, λ a b h,
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := max_lt_iff.1 h in Hδ (H _ a.2).1 (H _ b.2).2 h₁ h₂⟩
protected lemma real.continuous_mul : continuous (λp : ℝ × ℝ, p.1 * p.2) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩,
tendsto_of_uniform_continuous_subtype
(real.uniform_continuous_mul
({x | abs x < abs a₁ + 1}.prod {x | abs x < abs a₂ + 1})
(lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_nonneg _) (lt_add_one _))
(lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_nonneg _) (lt_add_one _))
(λ x, id))
(mem_nhds_sets
(is_open_prod
(real.continuous_abs _ $ is_open_gt' (abs a₁ + 1))
(real.continuous_abs _ $ is_open_gt' (abs a₂ + 1)))
⟨lt_add_one (abs a₁), lt_add_one (abs a₂)⟩)
instance : topological_ring ℝ :=
{ continuous_mul := real.continuous_mul, ..real.topological_add_group }
instance : topological_semiring ℝ := by apply_instance
lemma rat.continuous_mul : continuous (λp : ℚ × ℚ, p.1 * p.2) :=
embedding_of_rat.continuous_iff.2 $ by simp [(∘)]; exact
((continuous_fst.comp continuous_of_rat).prod_mk
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_of_rat)).comp real.continuous_mul
instance : topological_ring ℚ :=
{ continuous_mul := rat.continuous_mul, ..rat.topological_add_group }
theorem real.ball_eq_Ioo (x ε : ℝ) : ball x ε = Ioo (x - ε) (x + ε) :=
set.ext $ λ y, by rw [mem_ball, real.dist_eq,
abs_sub_lt_iff, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', and_comm, sub_lt]; refl
theorem real.Ioo_eq_ball (x y : ℝ) : Ioo x y = ball ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) :=
by rw [real.ball_eq_Ioo, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add,
add_sub_cancel', add_self_div_two, ← add_div,
add_assoc, add_sub_cancel'_right, add_self_div_two]
lemma real.totally_bounded_Ioo (a b : ℝ) : totally_bounded (Ioo a b) :=
metric.totally_bounded_iff.2 $ λ ε ε0, begin
rcases exists_nat_gt ((b - a) / ε) with ⟨n, ba⟩,
rw [div_lt_iff' ε0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'] at ba,
let s := (λ i:ℕ, a + ε * i) '' {i:ℕ | i < n},
refine ⟨s, finite_image _ ⟨set.fintype_lt_nat _⟩, λ x h, _⟩,
rcases h with ⟨ax, xb⟩,
let i : ℕ := ⌊(x - a) / ε⌋.to_nat,
have : (i : ℤ) = ⌊(x - a) / ε⌋ :=
int.to_nat_of_nonneg (floor_nonneg.2 $ le_of_lt (div_pos (sub_pos.2 ax) ε0)),
simp, refine ⟨_, ⟨i, _, rfl⟩, _⟩,
{ rw [← int.coe_nat_lt, this],
refine int.cast_lt.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (floor_le _) _),
rw [int.cast_coe_nat, div_lt_iff' ε0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'],
exact lt_trans xb ba },
{ rw [real.dist_eq, ← int.cast_coe_nat, this, abs_of_nonneg,
← sub_sub, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'],
{ have := lt_floor_add_one ((x - a) / ε),
rwa [div_lt_iff' ε0, mul_add, mul_one] at this },
{ have := floor_le ((x - a) / ε),
rwa [ge, sub_nonneg, ← le_sub_iff_add_le', ← le_div_iff' ε0] } }
end
lemma real.totally_bounded_ball (x ε : ℝ) : totally_bounded (ball x ε) :=
by rw real.ball_eq_Ioo; apply real.totally_bounded_Ioo
lemma real.totally_bounded_Ico (a b : ℝ) : totally_bounded (Ico a b) :=
let ⟨c, ac⟩ := no_bot a in totally_bounded_subset
(by exact λ x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le ac h₁, h₂⟩)
(real.totally_bounded_Ioo c b)
lemma real.totally_bounded_Icc (a b : ℝ) : totally_bounded (Icc a b) :=
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := no_top b in totally_bounded_subset
(by exact λ x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₁, lt_of_le_of_lt h₂ bc⟩)
(real.totally_bounded_Ico a c)
lemma rat.totally_bounded_Icc (a b : ℚ) : totally_bounded (Icc a b) :=
begin
have := totally_bounded_preimage uniform_embedding_of_rat (real.totally_bounded_Icc a b),
rwa (set.ext (λ q, _) : Icc _ _ = _), simp
end
-- TODO(Mario): Generalize to first-countable uniform spaces?
instance : complete_space ℝ :=
⟨λ f cf, begin
let g : ℕ → {ε:ℝ//ε>0} := λ n, ⟨n.to_pnat'⁻¹, inv_pos (nat.cast_pos.2 n.to_pnat'.pos)⟩,
choose S hS hS_dist using show ∀n:ℕ, ∃t ∈ f.sets, ∀ x y ∈ t, dist x y < g n, from
assume n, let ⟨t, tf, h⟩ := (metric.cauchy_iff.1 cf).2 (g n).1 (g n).2 in ⟨t, tf, h⟩,
let F : ℕ → set ℝ := λn, ⋂i≤n, S i,
have hF : ∀n, F n ∈ f.sets := assume n, Inter_mem_sets (finite_le_nat n) (λ i _, hS i),
have hF_dist : ∀n, ∀ x y ∈ F n, dist x y < g n :=
assume n x y hx hy,
have F n ⊆ S n := bInter_subset_of_mem (le_refl n),
(hS_dist n) _ _ (this hx) (this hy),
choose G hG using assume n:ℕ, inhabited_of_mem_sets cf.1 (hF n),
have hg : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ n, ∀ j ≥ n, (g j : ℝ) < ε,
{ intros ε ε0,
cases exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹ with n hn,
refine ⟨n, λ j nj, _⟩,
have hj := lt_of_lt_of_le hn (nat.cast_le.2 nj),
have j0 := lt_trans (inv_pos ε0) hj,
have jε := (inv_lt j0 ε0).2 hj,
rwa ← pnat.to_pnat'_coe (nat.cast_pos.1 j0) at jε },
let c : cau_seq ℝ abs,
{ refine ⟨λ n, G n, λ ε ε0, _⟩,
cases hg _ ε0 with n hn,
refine ⟨n, λ j jn, _⟩,
have : F j ⊆ F n :=
bInter_subset_bInter_left (λ i h, @le_trans _ _ i n j h jn),
exact lt_trans (hF_dist n _ _ (this (hG j)) (hG n)) (hn _ $ le_refl _) },
refine ⟨cau_seq.lim c, λ s h, _⟩,
rcases metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 h with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩,
cases exists_forall_ge_and (hg _ $ half_pos ε0)
(cau_seq.equiv_lim c _ $ half_pos ε0) with n hn,
cases hn _ (le_refl _) with h₁ h₂,
refine sets_of_superset _ (hF n) (subset.trans _ $
subset.trans (ball_half_subset (G n) h₂) hε),
exact λ x h, lt_trans ((hF_dist n) x (G n) h (hG n)) h₁
end⟩
lemma tendsto_of_nat_at_top_at_top : tendsto (coe : ℕ → ℝ) at_top at_top :=
tendsto_infi.2 $ assume r, tendsto_principal.2 $
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt r in
mem_at_top_sets.2 ⟨n, λ m h, le_trans (le_of_lt hn) (nat.cast_le.2 h)⟩
section
lemma closure_of_rat_image_lt {q : ℚ} : closure ((coe:ℚ → ℝ) '' {x | q < x}) = {r | ↑q ≤ r} :=
subset.antisymm
((closure_subset_iff_subset_of_is_closed (is_closed_ge' _)).2
(image_subset_iff.2 $ λ p h, le_of_lt $ (@rat.cast_lt ℝ _ _ _).2 h)) $
λ x hx, mem_closure_iff_nhds.2 $ λ t ht,
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 ht in
let ⟨p, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_rat_btwn ((lt_add_iff_pos_right x).2 ε0) in
ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.2 ⟨_, hε (show abs _ < _,
by rwa [abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt $ sub_pos.2 h₁), sub_lt_iff_lt_add']),
p, rat.cast_lt.1 (@lt_of_le_of_lt ℝ _ _ _ _ hx h₁), rfl⟩
/- TODO(Mario): Put these back only if needed later
lemma closure_of_rat_image_le_eq {q : ℚ} : closure ((coe:ℚ → ℝ) '' {x | q ≤ x}) = {r | ↑q ≤ r} :=
_
lemma closure_of_rat_image_le_le_eq {a b : ℚ} (hab : a ≤ b) :
closure (of_rat '' {q:ℚ | a ≤ q ∧ q ≤ b}) = {r:ℝ | of_rat a ≤ r ∧ r ≤ of_rat b} :=
_-/
lemma compact_Icc {a b : ℝ} : compact (Icc a b) :=
compact_of_totally_bounded_is_closed
(real.totally_bounded_Icc a b)
(is_closed_inter (is_closed_ge' a) (is_closed_le' b))
instance : proper_space ℝ :=
{ compact_ball := λx r, by rw closed_ball_Icc; apply compact_Icc }
open real
lemma real.intermediate_value {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b t : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x, a ≤ x → x ≤ b → tendsto f (nhds x) (nhds (f x)))
(ha : f a ≤ t) (hb : t ≤ f b) (hab : a ≤ b) : ∃ x : ℝ, a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b ∧ f x = t :=
let x := real.Sup {x | f x ≤ t ∧ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b} in
have hx₁ : ∃ y, ∀ g ∈ {x | f x ≤ t ∧ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b}, g ≤ y := ⟨b, λ _ h, h.2.2⟩,
have hx₂ : ∃ y, y ∈ {x | f x ≤ t ∧ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b} := ⟨a, ha, le_refl _, hab⟩,
have hax : a ≤ x, from le_Sup _ hx₁ ⟨ha, le_refl _, hab⟩,
have hxb : x ≤ b, from (Sup_le _ hx₂ hx₁).2 (λ _ h, h.2.2),
⟨x, hax, hxb,
eq_of_forall_dist_le $ λ ε ε0,
let ⟨δ, hδ0, hδ⟩ := metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds.1 (hf _ hax hxb) ε ε0 in
(le_total t (f x)).elim
(λ h, le_of_not_gt $ λ hfε, begin
rw [dist_eq, abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 h)] at hfε,
refine mt (Sup_le {x | f x ≤ t ∧ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b} hx₂ hx₁).2
(not_le_of_gt (sub_lt_self x (half_pos hδ0)))
(λ g hg, le_of_not_gt
(λ hgδ, not_lt_of_ge hg.1
(lt_trans (lt_sub.1 hfε) (sub_lt_of_sub_lt
(lt_of_le_of_lt (le_abs_self _) _))))),
rw abs_sub,
exact hδ (abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt (sub_nonpos.2 (le_Sup _ hx₁ hg)) hδ0,
by simp only [x] at *; linarith⟩)
end)
(λ h, le_of_not_gt $ λ hfε, begin
rw [dist_eq, abs_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 h)] at hfε,
exact mt (le_Sup {x | f x ≤ t ∧ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b})
(λ h : ∀ k, k ∈ {x | f x ≤ t ∧ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b} → k ≤ x,
not_le_of_gt ((lt_add_iff_pos_left x).2 (half_pos hδ0))
(h _ ⟨le_trans (le_sub_iff_add_le.2 (le_trans (le_abs_self _)
(le_of_lt (hδ $ by rw [dist_eq, add_sub_cancel, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (half_pos hδ0))];
exact half_lt_self hδ0))))
(by linarith),
le_trans hax (le_of_lt ((lt_add_iff_pos_left _).2 (half_pos hδ0))),
le_of_not_gt (λ hδy, not_lt_of_ge hb (lt_of_le_of_lt
(show f b ≤ f b - f x - ε + t, by linarith)
(add_lt_of_neg_of_le
(sub_neg_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_abs_self _)
(@hδ b (abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨by simp only [x] at *; linarith,
by linarith⟩))))
(le_refl _))))⟩))
hx₁
end)⟩
lemma real.intermediate_value' {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b t : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x, a ≤ x → x ≤ b → tendsto f (nhds x) (nhds (f x)))
(ha : t ≤ f a) (hb : f b ≤ t) (hab : a ≤ b) : ∃ x : ℝ, a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b ∧ f x = t :=
let ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂, hx₃⟩ := @real.intermediate_value
(λ x, - f x) a b (-t) (λ x hax hxb, tendsto_neg (hf x hax hxb))
(neg_le_neg ha) (neg_le_neg hb) hab in
⟨x, hx₁, hx₂, neg_inj hx₃⟩
lemma real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above {s : set ℝ} : bounded s ↔ bdd_below s ∧ bdd_above s :=
⟨begin
assume bdd,
rcases (bounded_iff_subset_ball 0).1 bdd with ⟨r, hr⟩, -- hr : s ⊆ closed_ball 0 r
rw closed_ball_Icc at hr, -- hr : s ⊆ Icc (0 - r) (0 + r)
exact ⟨⟨-r, λy hy, by simpa using (hr hy).1⟩, ⟨r, λy hy, by simpa using (hr hy).2⟩⟩
end,
begin
rintros ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, ⟨M, hM⟩⟩,
have I : s ⊆ Icc m M := λx hx, ⟨hm x hx, hM x hx⟩,
have : Icc m M = closed_ball ((m+M)/2) ((M-m)/2) :=
by rw closed_ball_Icc; congr; ring,
rw this at I,
exact bounded.subset I bounded_closed_ball
end⟩
end
|
d683e7272eae63758b8ad866f9d6f5ed8ca19fe9 | ff5230333a701471f46c57e8c115a073ebaaa448 | /library/init/data/prod.lean | a1d9ce60352c44cac55e71901e4e4d53b76b218e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stanford-cs242/lean | f81721d2b5d00bc175f2e58c57b710d465e6c858 | 7bd861261f4a37326dcf8d7a17f1f1f330e4548c | refs/heads/master | 1,600,957,431,849 | 1,576,465,093,000 | 1,576,465,093,000 | 225,779,423 | 0 | 3 | Apache-2.0 | 1,575,433,936,000 | 1,575,433,935,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,646 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
prelude
import init.logic
universes u v
section
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
@[simp] lemma prod.mk.eta : ∀{p : α × β}, (p.1, p.2) = p
| (a, b) := rfl
instance [inhabited α] [inhabited β] : inhabited (prod α β) :=
⟨(default α, default β)⟩
instance [h₁ : decidable_eq α] [h₂ : decidable_eq β] : decidable_eq (α × β)
| (a, b) (a', b') :=
match (h₁ a a') with
| (is_true e₁) :=
match (h₂ b b') with
| (is_true e₂) := is_true (eq.rec_on e₁ (eq.rec_on e₂ rfl))
| (is_false n₂) := is_false (assume h, prod.no_confusion h (λ e₁' e₂', absurd e₂' n₂))
end
| (is_false n₁) := is_false (assume h, prod.no_confusion h (λ e₁' e₂', absurd e₁' n₁))
end
instance [has_lt α] [has_lt β] : has_lt (α × β) :=
⟨λ s t, s.1 < t.1 ∨ (s.1 = t.1 ∧ s.2 < t.2)⟩
instance prod_has_decidable_lt
[has_lt α] [has_lt β]
[decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β]
[decidable_rel ((<) : α → α → Prop)]
[decidable_rel ((<) : β → β → Prop)] : Π s t : α × β, decidable (s < t) :=
λ t s, or.decidable
lemma prod.lt_def [has_lt α] [has_lt β] (s t : α × β) : (s < t) = (s.1 < t.1 ∨ (s.1 = t.1 ∧ s.2 < t.2)) :=
rfl
end
def {u₁ u₂ v₁ v₂} prod.map {α₁ : Type u₁} {α₂ : Type u₂} {β₁ : Type v₁} {β₂ : Type v₂}
(f : α₁ → α₂) (g : β₁ → β₂) : α₁ × β₁ → α₂ × β₂
| (a, b) := (f a, g b)
|
68bca3c1a495d1ac42ab8523f222e8c58862be56 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/data/pnat/intervals.lean | 324725b92d76e25d327718adbfe5d3b2895b5923 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 859 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.data.pnat.basic
import Mathlib.data.finset.intervals
import Mathlib.PostPort
namespace Mathlib
namespace pnat
/-- `Ico l u` is the set of positive natural numbers `l ≤ k < u`. -/
def Ico (l : ℕ+) (u : ℕ+) : finset ℕ+ :=
finset.map
(function.embedding.mk (fun (n : Subtype fun (x : ℕ) => x ∈ finset.Ico ↑l ↑u) => { val := ↑n, property := sorry })
sorry)
(finset.attach (finset.Ico ↑l ↑u))
@[simp] theorem Ico.mem {n : ℕ+} {m : ℕ+} {l : ℕ+} : l ∈ Ico n m ↔ n ≤ l ∧ l < m := sorry
@[simp] theorem Ico.card (l : ℕ+) (u : ℕ+) : finset.card (Ico l u) = ↑u - ↑l := sorry
|
ee988afcc6d73082a6fb255a647249981a4118c7 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/algebra/free.lean | bff0671d8c50bc7d86ea8474b85f8779e07492a6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 23,135 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import data.equiv.basic
import control.applicative
import control.traversable.basic
import algebra.group.hom
/-!
# Free constructions
## Main definitions
* `free_magma α`: free magma (structure with binary operation without any axioms) over alphabet `α`,
defined inductively, with traversable instance and decidable equality.
* `magma.free_semigroup α`: free semigroup over magma `α`.
* `free_semigroup α`: free semigroup over alphabet `α`, defined as a synonym for `α × list α`
(i.e. nonempty lists), with traversable instance and decidable equality.
* `free_semigroup_free_magma α`: isomorphism between `magma.free_semigroup (free_magma α)` and
`free_semigroup α`.
* `free_magma.lift`: the universal property of the free magma, expressing its adjointness.
-/
universes u v l
/-- Free magma over a given alphabet. -/
@[derive decidable_eq]
inductive free_magma (α : Type u) : Type u
| of : α → free_magma
| mul : free_magma → free_magma → free_magma
/-- Free nonabelian additive magma over a given alphabet. -/
@[derive decidable_eq]
inductive free_add_magma (α : Type u) : Type u
| of : α → free_add_magma
| add : free_add_magma → free_add_magma → free_add_magma
attribute [to_additive] free_magma
namespace free_magma
variables {α : Type u}
@[to_additive]
instance [inhabited α] : inhabited (free_magma α) := ⟨of default⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : has_mul (free_magma α) := ⟨free_magma.mul⟩
attribute [pattern] has_mul.mul
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem mul_eq (x y : free_magma α) : mul x y = x * y := rfl
/-- Recursor for `free_magma` using `x * y` instead of `free_magma.mul x y`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator, to_additive
"Recursor for `free_add_magma` using `x + y` instead of `free_add_magma.add x y`."]
def rec_on_mul {C : free_magma α → Sort l} (x)
(ih1 : ∀ x, C (of x)) (ih2 : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x * y)) :
C x :=
free_magma.rec_on x ih1 ih2
end free_magma
/-- Lifts a function `α → β` to a magma homomorphism `free_magma α → β` given a magma `β`. -/
def free_magma.lift_aux {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [has_mul β] (f : α → β) : free_magma α → β
| (free_magma.of x) := f x
| (x * y) := x.lift_aux * y.lift_aux
/-- Lifts a function `α → β` to an additive magma homomorphism `free_add_magma α → β` given
an additive magma `β`. -/
def free_add_magma.lift_aux {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [has_add β] (f : α → β) : free_add_magma α → β
| (free_add_magma.of x) := f x
| (x + y) := x.lift_aux + y.lift_aux
attribute [to_additive free_add_magma.lift_aux] free_magma.lift_aux
namespace free_magma
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [has_mul β] (f : α → β)
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_aux_unique (F : mul_hom (free_magma α) β) : ⇑F = lift_aux (F ∘ of) :=
funext $ λ x, free_magma.rec_on x (λ x, rfl) $ λ x y ih1 ih2,
(F.map_mul x y).trans $ congr (congr_arg _ ih1) ih2
/-- The universal property of the free magma expressing its adjointness. -/
@[to_additive "The universal property of the free additive magma expressing its adjointness."]
def lift : (α → β) ≃ mul_hom (free_magma α) β :=
{ to_fun := λ f,
{ to_fun := lift_aux f,
map_mul' := λ x y, rfl, },
inv_fun := λ F, F ∘ of,
left_inv := λ f, by { ext, simp only [lift_aux, mul_hom.coe_mk, function.comp_app], },
right_inv := λ F, by { ext, rw [mul_hom.coe_mk, lift_aux_unique], } }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma lift_of (x) : lift f (of x) = f x := rfl
end free_magma
/-- The unique magma homomorphism `free_magma α → free_magma β` that sends
each `of x` to `of (f x)`. -/
def free_magma.map {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) : free_magma α → free_magma β
| (free_magma.of x) := free_magma.of (f x)
| (x * y) := x.map * y.map
/-- The unique additive magma homomorphism `free_add_magma α → free_add_magma β` that sends
each `of x` to `of (f x)`. -/
def free_add_magma.map {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) : free_add_magma α → free_add_magma β
| (free_add_magma.of x) := free_add_magma.of (f x)
| (x + y) := x.map + y.map
attribute [to_additive free_add_magma.map] free_magma.map
namespace free_magma
variables {α : Type u}
section map
variables {β : Type v} (f : α → β)
@[simp, to_additive] lemma map_of (x) : map f (of x) = of (f x) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma map_mul (x y) : map f (x * y) = map f x * map f y := rfl
end map
section category
@[to_additive]
instance : monad free_magma :=
{ pure := λ _, of,
bind := λ _ _ x f, lift f x }
/-- Recursor on `free_magma` using `pure` instead of `of`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator, to_additive "Recursor on `free_add_magma` using `pure` instead of `of`."]
protected def rec_on_pure {C : free_magma α → Sort l} (x)
(ih1 : ∀ x, C (pure x)) (ih2 : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x * y)) :
C x :=
free_magma.rec_on_mul x ih1 ih2
variables {β : Type u}
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma map_pure (f : α → β) (x) : (f <$> pure x : free_magma β) = pure (f x) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma map_mul' (f : α → β) (x y : free_magma α) : (f <$> (x * y)) = (f <$> x * f <$> y) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma pure_bind (f : α → free_magma β) (x) : (pure x >>= f) = f x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_bind (f : α → free_magma β) (x y : free_magma α) :
(x * y >>= f) = ((x >>= f) * (y >>= f)) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma pure_seq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {x : free_magma α} : pure f <*> x = f <$> x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_seq {α β : Type u} {f g : free_magma (α → β)} {x : free_magma α} :
(f * g) <*> x = (f <*> x) * (g <*> x) := rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : is_lawful_monad free_magma.{u} :=
{ pure_bind := λ _ _ _ _, rfl,
bind_assoc := λ α β γ x f g, free_magma.rec_on_pure x (λ x, rfl)
(λ x y ih1 ih2, by rw [mul_bind, mul_bind, mul_bind, ih1, ih2]),
id_map := λ α x, free_magma.rec_on_pure x (λ _, rfl)
(λ x y ih1 ih2, by rw [map_mul', ih1, ih2]) }
end category
end free_magma
/-- `free_magma` is traversable. -/
protected def free_magma.traverse {m : Type u → Type u} [applicative m] {α β : Type u}
(F : α → m β) :
free_magma α → m (free_magma β)
| (free_magma.of x) := free_magma.of <$> F x
| (x * y) := (*) <$> x.traverse <*> y.traverse
/-- `free_add_magma` is traversable. -/
protected def free_add_magma.traverse {m : Type u → Type u} [applicative m] {α β : Type u}
(F : α → m β) :
free_add_magma α → m (free_add_magma β)
| (free_add_magma.of x) := free_add_magma.of <$> F x
| (x + y) := (+) <$> x.traverse <*> y.traverse
attribute [to_additive free_add_magma.traverse] free_magma.traverse
namespace free_magma
variables {α : Type u}
section category
variables {β : Type u}
@[to_additive]
instance : traversable free_magma := ⟨@free_magma.traverse⟩
variables {m : Type u → Type u} [applicative m] (F : α → m β)
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma traverse_pure (x) : traverse F (pure x : free_magma α) = pure <$> F x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma traverse_pure' : traverse F ∘ pure = λ x, (pure <$> F x : m (free_magma β)) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma traverse_mul (x y : free_magma α) :
traverse F (x * y) = (*) <$> traverse F x <*> traverse F y := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma traverse_mul' :
function.comp (traverse F) ∘ @has_mul.mul (free_magma α) _ =
λ x y, (*) <$> traverse F x <*> traverse F y := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma traverse_eq (x) : free_magma.traverse F x = traverse F x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_map_seq (x y : free_magma α) :
((*) <$> x <*> y : id (free_magma α)) = (x * y : free_magma α) := rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : is_lawful_traversable free_magma.{u} :=
{ id_traverse := λ α x, free_magma.rec_on_pure x (λ x, rfl)
(λ x y ih1 ih2, by rw [traverse_mul, ih1, ih2, mul_map_seq]),
comp_traverse := λ F G hf1 hg1 hf2 hg2 α β γ f g x, free_magma.rec_on_pure x
(λ x, by resetI; simp only [traverse_pure, traverse_pure'] with functor_norm)
(λ x y ih1 ih2, by resetI; rw [traverse_mul, ih1, ih2, traverse_mul];
simp only [traverse_mul'] with functor_norm),
naturality := λ F G hf1 hg1 hf2 hg2 η α β f x, free_magma.rec_on_pure x
(λ x, by simp only [traverse_pure] with functor_norm)
(λ x y ih1 ih2, by simp only [traverse_mul] with functor_norm; rw [ih1, ih2]),
traverse_eq_map_id := λ α β f x, free_magma.rec_on_pure x (λ _, rfl)
(λ x y ih1 ih2, by rw [traverse_mul, ih1, ih2, map_mul', mul_map_seq]; refl),
.. free_magma.is_lawful_monad }
end category
end free_magma
/-- Representation of an element of a free magma. -/
protected def free_magma.repr {α : Type u} [has_repr α] : free_magma α → string
| (free_magma.of x) := repr x
| (x * y) := "( " ++ x.repr ++ " * " ++ y.repr ++ " )"
/-- Representation of an element of a free additive magma. -/
protected def free_add_magma.repr {α : Type u} [has_repr α] : free_add_magma α → string
| (free_add_magma.of x) := repr x
| (x + y) := "( " ++ x.repr ++ " + " ++ y.repr ++ " )"
attribute [to_additive free_add_magma.repr] free_magma.repr
@[to_additive]
instance {α : Type u} [has_repr α] : has_repr (free_magma α) := ⟨free_magma.repr⟩
/-- Length of an element of a free magma. -/
def free_magma.length {α : Type u} : free_magma α → ℕ
| (free_magma.of x) := 1
| (x * y) := x.length + y.length
/-- Length of an element of a free additive magma. -/
def free_add_magma.length {α : Type u} : free_add_magma α → ℕ
| (free_add_magma.of x) := 1
| (x + y) := x.length + y.length
attribute [to_additive free_add_magma.length] free_magma.length
/-- Associativity relations for a magma. -/
inductive magma.free_semigroup.r (α : Type u) [has_mul α] : α → α → Prop
| intro : ∀ x y z, magma.free_semigroup.r ((x * y) * z) (x * (y * z))
| left : ∀ w x y z, magma.free_semigroup.r (w * ((x * y) * z)) (w * (x * (y * z)))
/-- Associativity relations for an additive magma. -/
inductive add_magma.free_add_semigroup.r (α : Type u) [has_add α] : α → α → Prop
| intro : ∀ x y z, add_magma.free_add_semigroup.r ((x + y) + z) (x + (y + z))
| left : ∀ w x y z, add_magma.free_add_semigroup.r (w + ((x + y) + z)) (w + (x + (y + z)))
attribute [to_additive add_magma.free_add_semigroup.r] magma.free_semigroup.r
namespace magma
/-- Free semigroup over a magma. -/
@[to_additive add_magma.free_add_semigroup "Free additive semigroup over an additive magma."]
def free_semigroup (α : Type u) [has_mul α] : Type u :=
quot $ free_semigroup.r α
namespace free_semigroup
variables {α : Type u} [has_mul α]
/-- Embedding from magma to its free semigroup. -/
@[to_additive "Embedding from additive magma to its free additive semigroup."]
def of : α → free_semigroup α := quot.mk _
@[to_additive]
instance [inhabited α] : inhabited (free_semigroup α) := ⟨of default⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator, to_additive]
protected lemma induction_on {C : free_semigroup α → Prop} (x : free_semigroup α)
(ih : ∀ x, C (of x)) : C x :=
quot.induction_on x ih
@[to_additive]
theorem of_mul_assoc (x y z : α) : of ((x * y) * z) = of (x * (y * z)) :=
quot.sound $ r.intro x y z
@[to_additive]
theorem of_mul_assoc_left (w x y z : α) : of (w * ((x * y) * z)) = of (w * (x * (y * z))) :=
quot.sound $ r.left w x y z
@[to_additive]
theorem of_mul_assoc_right (w x y z : α) : of (((w * x) * y) * z) = of ((w * (x * y)) * z) :=
by rw [of_mul_assoc, of_mul_assoc, of_mul_assoc, of_mul_assoc_left]
@[to_additive]
instance : semigroup (free_semigroup α) :=
{ mul := λ x y, begin
refine quot.lift_on x (λ p, quot.lift_on y (λ q, (quot.mk _ $ p * q : free_semigroup α)) _) _,
{ rintros a b (⟨c, d, e⟩ | ⟨c, d, e, f⟩); change of _ = of _,
{ rw of_mul_assoc_left },
{ rw [← of_mul_assoc, of_mul_assoc_left, of_mul_assoc] } },
{ refine quot.induction_on y (λ q, _),
rintros a b (⟨c, d, e⟩ | ⟨c, d, e, f⟩); change of _ = of _,
{ rw of_mul_assoc_right },
{ rw [of_mul_assoc, of_mul_assoc, of_mul_assoc_left, of_mul_assoc_left, of_mul_assoc_left,
← of_mul_assoc c d, ← of_mul_assoc c d, of_mul_assoc_left] } }
end,
mul_assoc := λ x y z, quot.induction_on x $ λ p, quot.induction_on y $ λ q,
quot.induction_on z $ λ r, of_mul_assoc p q r }
@[to_additive]
theorem of_mul (x y : α) : of (x * y) = of x * of y := rfl
section lift
variables {β : Type v} [semigroup β] (f : α → β)
/-- Lifts a magma homomorphism `α → β` to a semigroup homomorphism `magma.free_semigroup α → β`
given a semigroup `β`. -/
@[to_additive "Lifts an additive magma homomorphism `α → β` to an additive semigroup homomorphism
`add_magma.free_add_semigroup α → β` given an additive semigroup `β`."]
def lift (hf : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) : free_semigroup α → β :=
quot.lift f $ by rintros a b (⟨c, d, e⟩ | ⟨c, d, e, f⟩); simp only [hf, mul_assoc]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma lift_of {hf} (x : α) : lift f hf (of x) = f x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma lift_mul {hf} (x y) : lift f hf (x * y) = lift f hf x * lift f hf y :=
quot.induction_on x $ λ p, quot.induction_on y $ λ q, hf p q
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_unique (f : free_semigroup α → β) (hf : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
f = lift (f ∘ of) (λ p q, hf (of p) (of q)) :=
funext $ λ x, quot.induction_on x $ λ p, rfl
end lift
variables {β : Type v} [has_mul β] (f : α → β)
/-- From a magma homomorphism `α → β` to a semigroup homomorphism
`magma.free_semigroup α → magma.free_semigroup β`. -/
@[to_additive "From an additive magma homomorphism `α → β` to an additive semigroup homomorphism
`add_magma.free_add_semigroup α → add_magma.free_add_semigroup β`."]
def map (hf : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) : free_semigroup α → free_semigroup β :=
lift (of ∘ f) (λ x y, congr_arg of $ hf x y)
@[simp, to_additive] lemma map_of {hf} (x) : map f hf (of x) = of (f x) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma map_mul {hf} (x y) : map f hf (x * y) = map f hf x * map f hf y :=
lift_mul _ _ _
end free_semigroup
end magma
/-- Free semigroup over a given alphabet.
(Note: In this definition, the free semigroup does not contain the empty word.) -/
@[to_additive "Free additive semigroup over a given alphabet."]
def free_semigroup (α : Type u) : Type u :=
α × list α
namespace free_semigroup
variables {α : Type u}
@[to_additive]
instance : semigroup (free_semigroup α) :=
{ mul := λ L1 L2, (L1.1, L1.2 ++ L2.1 :: L2.2),
mul_assoc := λ L1 L2 L3, prod.ext rfl $ list.append_assoc _ _ _ }
/-- The embedding `α → free_semigroup α`. -/
@[to_additive "The embedding `α → free_add_semigroup α`."]
def of (x : α) : free_semigroup α :=
(x, [])
@[to_additive]
instance [inhabited α] : inhabited (free_semigroup α) := ⟨of default⟩
/-- Recursor for free semigroup using `of` and `*`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator, to_additive "Recursor for free additive semigroup using `of` and `+`."]
protected def rec_on {C : free_semigroup α → Sort l} (x)
(ih1 : ∀ x, C (of x)) (ih2 : ∀ x y, C (of x) → C y → C (of x * y)) :
C x :=
prod.rec_on x $ λ f s, list.rec_on s ih1 (λ hd tl ih f, ih2 f (hd, tl) (ih1 f) (ih hd)) f
end free_semigroup
/-- Auxiliary function for `free_semigroup.lift`. -/
def free_semigroup.lift' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [semigroup β] (f : α → β) : α → list α → β
| x [] := f x
| x (hd::tl) := f x * free_semigroup.lift' hd tl
/-- Auxiliary function for `free_semigroup.lift`. -/
def free_add_semigroup.lift' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [add_semigroup β] (f : α → β) :
α → list α → β
| x [] := f x
| x (hd::tl) := f x + free_add_semigroup.lift' hd tl
attribute [to_additive free_add_semigroup.lift'] free_semigroup.lift'
namespace free_semigroup
variables {α : Type u}
section lift
variables {β : Type v} [semigroup β] (f : α → β)
/-- Lifts a function `α → β` to a semigroup homomorphism `free_semigroup α → β` given
a semigroup `β`. -/
@[to_additive "Lifts a function `α → β` to an additive semigroup homomorphism
`free_add_semigroup α → β` given an additive semigroup `β`."]
def lift (x : free_semigroup α) : β :=
lift' f x.1 x.2
@[simp, to_additive] lemma lift_of (x : α) : lift f (of x) = f x := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma lift_of_mul (x y) : lift f (of x * y) = f x * lift f y := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma lift_mul (x y) : lift f (x * y) = lift f x * lift f y :=
free_semigroup.rec_on x (λ p, rfl)
(λ p x ih1 ih2, by rw [mul_assoc, lift_of_mul, lift_of_mul, mul_assoc, ih2])
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_unique (f : free_semigroup α → β) (hf : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
f = lift (f ∘ of) :=
funext $ λ ⟨x, L⟩, list.rec_on L (λ x, rfl) (λ hd tl ih x,
(hf (of x) (hd, tl)).trans $ congr_arg _ $ ih _) x
end lift
section map
variables {β : Type v} (f : α → β)
/-- The unique semigroup homomorphism that sends `of x` to `of (f x)`. -/
@[to_additive "The unique additive semigroup homomorphism that sends `of x` to `of (f x)`."]
def map : free_semigroup α → free_semigroup β :=
lift $ of ∘ f
@[simp, to_additive] lemma map_of (x) : map f (of x) = of (f x) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma map_mul (x y) : map f (x * y) = map f x * map f y :=
lift_mul _ _ _
end map
section category
variables {β : Type u}
@[to_additive]
instance : monad free_semigroup :=
{ pure := λ _, of,
bind := λ _ _ x f, lift f x }
/-- Recursor that uses `pure` instead of `of`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator, to_additive "Recursor that uses `pure` instead of `of`."]
def rec_on_pure {C : free_semigroup α → Sort l} (x)
(ih1 : ∀ x, C (pure x)) (ih2 : ∀ x y, C (pure x) → C y → C (pure x * y)) :
C x :=
free_semigroup.rec_on x ih1 ih2
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma map_pure (f : α → β) (x) : (f <$> pure x : free_semigroup β) = pure (f x) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma map_mul' (f : α → β) (x y : free_semigroup α) :
(f <$> (x * y)) = (f <$> x * f <$> y) :=
map_mul _ _ _
@[simp, to_additive] lemma pure_bind (f : α → free_semigroup β) (x) :
(pure x >>= f) = f x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_bind (f : α → free_semigroup β) (x y : free_semigroup α) :
(x * y >>= f) = ((x >>= f) * (y >>= f)) :=
lift_mul _ _ _
@[simp, to_additive] lemma pure_seq {f : α → β} {x : free_semigroup α} :
pure f <*> x = f <$> x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_seq {f g : free_semigroup (α → β)} {x : free_semigroup α} :
(f * g) <*> x = (f <*> x) * (g <*> x) :=
mul_bind _ _ _
@[to_additive]
instance : is_lawful_monad free_semigroup.{u} :=
{ pure_bind := λ _ _ _ _, rfl,
bind_assoc := λ α β γ x f g, rec_on_pure x (λ x, rfl)
(λ x y ih1 ih2, by rw [mul_bind, mul_bind, mul_bind, ih1, ih2]),
id_map := λ α x, rec_on_pure x (λ _, rfl) (λ x y ih1 ih2, by rw [map_mul', ih1, ih2]) }
/-- `free_semigroup` is traversable. -/
@[to_additive "`free_add_semigroup` is traversable."]
protected def traverse {m : Type u → Type u} [applicative m]
{α β : Type u} (F : α → m β) (x : free_semigroup α) : m (free_semigroup β) :=
rec_on_pure x (λ x, pure <$> F x) (λ x y ihx ihy, (*) <$> ihx <*> ihy)
@[to_additive]
instance : traversable free_semigroup := ⟨@free_semigroup.traverse⟩
variables {m : Type u → Type u} [applicative m] (F : α → m β)
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma traverse_pure (x) :traverse F (pure x : free_semigroup α) = pure <$> F x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma traverse_pure' : traverse F ∘ pure = λ x, (pure <$> F x : m (free_semigroup β)) := rfl
section
variables [is_lawful_applicative m]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma traverse_mul (x y : free_semigroup α) :
traverse F (x * y) = (*) <$> traverse F x <*> traverse F y :=
let ⟨x, L1⟩ := x, ⟨y, L2⟩ := y in
list.rec_on L1 (λ x, rfl) (λ hd tl ih x,
show (*) <$> pure <$> F x <*> traverse F ((hd, tl) * (y, L2) : free_semigroup α) =
(*) <$> ((*) <$> pure <$> F x <*> traverse F (hd, tl)) <*> traverse F (y, L2),
by rw ih; simp only [(∘), (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm] with functor_norm) x
@[simp, to_additive] lemma traverse_mul' :
function.comp (traverse F) ∘ @has_mul.mul (free_semigroup α) _ =
λ x y, (*) <$> traverse F x <*> traverse F y :=
funext $ λ x, funext $ λ y, traverse_mul F x y
end
@[simp, to_additive] lemma traverse_eq (x) : free_semigroup.traverse F x = traverse F x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_map_seq (x y : free_semigroup α) :
((*) <$> x <*> y : id (free_semigroup α)) = (x * y : free_semigroup α) := rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : is_lawful_traversable free_semigroup.{u} :=
{ id_traverse := λ α x, free_semigroup.rec_on x (λ x, rfl)
(λ x y ih1 ih2, by rw [traverse_mul, ih1, ih2, mul_map_seq]),
comp_traverse := λ F G hf1 hg1 hf2 hg2 α β γ f g x, rec_on_pure x
(λ x, by resetI; simp only [traverse_pure, traverse_pure'] with functor_norm)
(λ x y ih1 ih2, by resetI; rw [traverse_mul, ih1, ih2, traverse_mul];
simp only [traverse_mul'] with functor_norm),
naturality := λ F G hf1 hg1 hf2 hg2 η α β f x, rec_on_pure x
(λ x, by simp only [traverse_pure] with functor_norm)
(λ x y ih1 ih2, by resetI; simp only [traverse_mul] with functor_norm; rw [ih1, ih2]),
traverse_eq_map_id := λ α β f x, free_semigroup.rec_on x (λ _, rfl)
(λ x y ih1 ih2, by rw [traverse_mul, ih1, ih2, map_mul', mul_map_seq]; refl),
.. free_semigroup.is_lawful_monad }
end category
@[to_additive]
instance [decidable_eq α] : decidable_eq (free_semigroup α) := prod.decidable_eq
end free_semigroup
/-- Isomorphism between `magma.free_semigroup (free_magma α)` and `free_semigroup α`. -/
@[to_additive "Isomorphism between
`add_magma.free_add_semigroup (free_add_magma α)` and `free_add_semigroup α`."]
def free_semigroup_free_magma (α : Type u) :
magma.free_semigroup (free_magma α) ≃ free_semigroup α :=
{ to_fun :=
magma.free_semigroup.lift (free_magma.lift free_semigroup.of) (free_magma.lift _).map_mul,
inv_fun := free_semigroup.lift (magma.free_semigroup.of ∘ free_magma.of),
left_inv := λ x, magma.free_semigroup.induction_on x $ λ p, by rw magma.free_semigroup.lift_of;
exact free_magma.rec_on_mul p
(λ x, by rw [free_magma.lift_of, free_semigroup.lift_of])
(λ x y ihx ihy, by rw [mul_hom.map_mul, free_semigroup.lift_mul, ihx, ihy,
magma.free_semigroup.of_mul]),
right_inv := λ x, free_semigroup.rec_on x
(λ x, by rw [free_semigroup.lift_of, magma.free_semigroup.lift_of, free_magma.lift_of])
(λ x y ihx ihy, by rw [free_semigroup.lift_mul, magma.free_semigroup.lift_mul, ihx, ihy]) }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma free_semigroup_free_magma_mul {α : Type u} (x y) :
free_semigroup_free_magma α (x * y) = free_semigroup_free_magma α x *
free_semigroup_free_magma α y :=
magma.free_semigroup.lift_mul _ _ _
|
8a9b41ee85363f299ba6abbd4e7bf39169e133d5 | 36c7a18fd72e5b57229bd8ba36493daf536a19ce | /library/data/int/gcd.lean | f694188a6ba218cb9882865ff6389998c49ec0ac | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | YHVHvx/lean | 732bf0fb7a298cd7fe0f15d82f8e248c11db49e9 | 038369533e0136dd395dc252084d3c1853accbf2 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,701,080,210 | 1,449,128,595,000 | 1,449,128,595,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,586 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
Definitions and properties of gcd, lcm, and coprime.
-/
import .div data.nat.gcd
open eq.ops
open algebra
namespace int
/- gcd -/
definition gcd (a b : ℤ) : ℤ := of_nat (nat.gcd (nat_abs a) (nat_abs b))
theorem gcd_nonneg (a b : ℤ) : gcd a b ≥ 0 :=
of_nat_nonneg (nat.gcd (nat_abs a) (nat_abs b))
theorem gcd.comm (a b : ℤ) : gcd a b = gcd b a :=
by rewrite [↑gcd, nat.gcd.comm]
theorem gcd_zero_right (a : ℤ) : gcd a 0 = abs a :=
by rewrite [↑gcd, nat_abs_zero, nat.gcd_zero_right, of_nat_nat_abs]
theorem gcd_zero_left (a : ℤ) : gcd 0 a = abs a :=
by rewrite [gcd.comm, gcd_zero_right]
theorem gcd_one_right (a : ℤ) : gcd a 1 = 1 :=
by rewrite [↑gcd, nat_abs_one, nat.gcd_one_right]
theorem gcd_one_left (a : ℤ) : gcd 1 a = 1 :=
by rewrite [gcd.comm, gcd_one_right]
theorem gcd_abs_left (a b : ℤ) : gcd (abs a) b = gcd a b :=
by rewrite [↑gcd, *nat_abs_abs]
theorem gcd_abs_right (a b : ℤ) : gcd (abs a) b = gcd a b :=
by rewrite [↑gcd, *nat_abs_abs]
theorem gcd_abs_abs (a b : ℤ) : gcd (abs a) (abs b) = gcd a b :=
by rewrite [↑gcd, *nat_abs_abs]
section
open nat
theorem gcd_of_ne_zero (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) : gcd a b = gcd b (abs a % abs b) :=
have nat_abs b ≠ 0, from assume H', H (eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero H'),
have nat_abs b > 0, from pos_of_ne_zero this,
assert nat.gcd (nat_abs a) (nat_abs b) = (nat.gcd (nat_abs b) (nat_abs a % nat_abs b)),
from @nat.gcd_of_pos (nat_abs a) (nat_abs b) this,
calc
gcd a b = nat.gcd (nat_abs b) (nat_abs a % nat_abs b) : by rewrite [↑gcd, this]
... = gcd (abs b) (abs a % abs b) : by rewrite [↑gcd, -*of_nat_nat_abs, of_nat_mod]
... = gcd b (abs a % abs b) : by rewrite [↑gcd, *nat_abs_abs]
end
theorem gcd_of_pos (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b > 0) : gcd a b = gcd b (abs a % b) :=
by rewrite [!gcd_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt H), abs_of_pos H]
theorem gcd_of_nonneg_of_pos {a b : ℤ} (H1 : a ≥ 0) (H2 : b > 0) : gcd a b = gcd b (a % b) :=
by rewrite [!gcd_of_pos H2, abs_of_nonneg H1]
theorem gcd_self (a : ℤ) : gcd a a = abs a :=
by rewrite [↑gcd, nat.gcd_self, of_nat_nat_abs]
theorem gcd_dvd_left (a b : ℤ) : gcd a b ∣ a :=
have gcd a b ∣ abs a,
by rewrite [↑gcd, -of_nat_nat_abs, of_nat_dvd_of_nat_iff]; apply nat.gcd_dvd_left,
iff.mp !dvd_abs_iff this
theorem gcd_dvd_right (a b : ℤ) : gcd a b ∣ b :=
by rewrite gcd.comm; apply gcd_dvd_left
theorem dvd_gcd {a b c : ℤ} : a ∣ b → a ∣ c → a ∣ gcd b c :=
begin
rewrite [↑gcd, -*(abs_dvd_iff a), -(dvd_abs_iff _ b), -(dvd_abs_iff _ c), -*of_nat_nat_abs],
rewrite [*of_nat_dvd_of_nat_iff] ,
apply nat.dvd_gcd
end
theorem gcd.assoc (a b c : ℤ) : gcd (gcd a b) c = gcd a (gcd b c) :=
dvd.antisymm !gcd_nonneg !gcd_nonneg
(dvd_gcd
(dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_left !gcd_dvd_left)
(dvd_gcd (dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_left !gcd_dvd_right) !gcd_dvd_right))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd !gcd_dvd_left (dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_right !gcd_dvd_left))
(dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_right !gcd_dvd_right))
theorem gcd_mul_left (a b c : ℤ) : gcd (a * b) (a * c) = abs a * gcd b c :=
by rewrite [↑gcd, *nat_abs_mul, nat.gcd_mul_left, of_nat_mul, of_nat_nat_abs]
theorem gcd_mul_right (a b c : ℤ) : gcd (a * b) (c * b) = gcd a c * abs b :=
by rewrite [mul.comm a, mul.comm c, mul.comm (gcd a c), gcd_mul_left]
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left {a : ℤ} (b : ℤ) (H : a ≠ 0) : gcd a b > 0 :=
have gcd a b ≠ 0, from
suppose gcd a b = 0,
have 0 ∣ a, from this ▸ gcd_dvd_left a b,
show false, from H (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd this),
lt_of_le_of_ne (gcd_nonneg a b) (ne.symm this)
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_right (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) : gcd a b > 0 :=
by rewrite gcd.comm; apply !gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left H
theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left {a b : ℤ} (H : gcd a b = 0) : a = 0 :=
decidable.by_contradiction
(suppose a ≠ 0,
have gcd a b > 0, from !gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left this,
ne_of_lt this H⁻¹)
theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right {a b : ℤ} (H : gcd a b = 0) : b = 0 :=
by rewrite gcd.comm at H; apply !eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H
theorem gcd_div {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : c ∣ a) (H2 : c ∣ b) :
gcd (a / c) (b / c) = gcd a b / (abs c) :=
decidable.by_cases
(suppose c = 0,
calc
gcd (a / c) (b / c) = gcd 0 0 : by subst c; rewrite *int.div_zero
... = 0 : gcd_zero_left
... = gcd a b / 0 : int.div_zero
... = gcd a b / (abs c) : by subst c)
(suppose c ≠ 0,
have abs c ≠ 0, from assume H', this (eq_zero_of_abs_eq_zero H'),
eq.symm (int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left this
(eq.symm (calc
gcd (a / c) (b / c) * abs c = gcd (a / c * c) (b / c * c) : gcd_mul_right
... = gcd a (b / c * c) : int.div_mul_cancel H1
... = gcd a b : int.div_mul_cancel H2))))
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (a b c : ℤ) : gcd a b ∣ gcd (c * a) b :=
dvd_gcd (dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_left !dvd_mul_left) !gcd_dvd_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (a b c : ℤ) : gcd a b ∣ gcd (a * c) b :=
!mul.comm ▸ !gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left
theorem div_gcd_eq_div_gcd_of_nonneg {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : ℤ} (H : a₁ * b₂ = a₂ * b₁)
(H1 : b₁ ≠ 0) (H2 : b₂ ≠ 0) (H3 : a₁ ≥ 0) (H4 : a₂ ≥ 0) :
a₁ / (gcd a₁ b₁) = a₂ / (gcd a₂ b₂) :=
begin
apply div_eq_div_of_dvd_of_dvd,
repeat (apply gcd_dvd_left),
intro H', apply H1, apply eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right H',
intro H', apply H2, apply eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right H',
rewrite [-abs_of_nonneg H3 at {1}, -abs_of_nonneg H4 at {2}],
rewrite [-gcd_mul_left, -gcd_mul_right, H, mul.comm b₁]
end
theorem div_gcd_eq_div_gcd {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : ℤ} (H : a₁ * b₂ = a₂ * b₁) (H1 : b₁ > 0) (H2 : b₂ > 0) :
a₁ / (gcd a₁ b₁) = a₂ / (gcd a₂ b₂) :=
or.elim (le_or_gt 0 a₁)
(assume H3 : a₁ ≥ 0,
have H4 : a₂ * b₁ ≥ 0, by rewrite -H; apply mul_nonneg H3 (le_of_lt H2),
have H5 : a₂ ≥ 0, from nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right H4 H1,
div_gcd_eq_div_gcd_of_nonneg H (ne_of_gt H1) (ne_of_gt H2) H3 H5)
(assume H3 : a₁ < 0,
have H4 : a₂ * b₁ < 0, by rewrite -H; apply mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos H3 H2,
assert H5 : a₂ < 0, from neg_of_mul_neg_right H4 (le_of_lt H1),
assert H6 : abs a₁ / (gcd (abs a₁) (abs b₁)) = abs a₂ / (gcd (abs a₂) (abs b₂)),
begin
apply div_gcd_eq_div_gcd_of_nonneg,
rewrite [abs_of_pos H1, abs_of_pos H2, abs_of_neg H3, abs_of_neg H5],
rewrite [-*neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, H],
apply ne_of_gt (abs_pos_of_pos H1),
apply ne_of_gt (abs_pos_of_pos H2),
repeat (apply abs_nonneg)
end,
have H7 : -a₁ / (gcd a₁ b₁) = -a₂ / (gcd a₂ b₂),
begin
rewrite [-abs_of_neg H3, -abs_of_neg H5, -gcd_abs_abs a₁],
rewrite [-gcd_abs_abs a₂ b₂],
exact H6
end,
calc
a₁ / (gcd a₁ b₁) = -(-a₁ / (gcd a₁ b₁)) :
by rewrite [neg_div_of_dvd !gcd_dvd_left, neg_neg]
... = -(-a₂ / (gcd a₂ b₂)) : H7
... = a₂ / (gcd a₂ b₂) :
by rewrite [neg_div_of_dvd !gcd_dvd_left, neg_neg])
/- lcm -/
definition lcm (a b : ℤ) : ℤ := of_nat (nat.lcm (nat_abs a) (nat_abs b))
theorem lcm_nonneg (a b : ℤ) : lcm a b ≥ 0 :=
of_nat_nonneg (nat.lcm (nat_abs a) (nat_abs b))
theorem lcm.comm (a b : ℤ) : lcm a b = lcm b a :=
by rewrite [↑lcm, nat.lcm.comm]
theorem lcm_zero_left (a : ℤ) : lcm 0 a = 0 :=
by rewrite [↑lcm, nat_abs_zero, nat.lcm_zero_left]
theorem lcm_zero_right (a : ℤ) : lcm a 0 = 0 :=
!lcm.comm ▸ !lcm_zero_left
theorem lcm_one_left (a : ℤ) : lcm 1 a = abs a :=
by rewrite [↑lcm, nat_abs_one, nat.lcm_one_left, of_nat_nat_abs]
theorem lcm_one_right (a : ℤ) : lcm a 1 = abs a :=
!lcm.comm ▸ !lcm_one_left
theorem lcm_abs_left (a b : ℤ) : lcm (abs a) b = lcm a b :=
by rewrite [↑lcm, *nat_abs_abs]
theorem lcm_abs_right (a b : ℤ) : lcm (abs a) b = lcm a b :=
by rewrite [↑lcm, *nat_abs_abs]
theorem lcm_abs_abs (a b : ℤ) : lcm (abs a) (abs b) = lcm a b :=
by rewrite [↑lcm, *nat_abs_abs]
theorem lcm_self (a : ℤ) : lcm a a = abs a :=
by rewrite [↑lcm, nat.lcm_self, of_nat_nat_abs]
theorem dvd_lcm_left (a b : ℤ) : a ∣ lcm a b :=
by rewrite [↑lcm, -abs_dvd_iff, -of_nat_nat_abs, of_nat_dvd_of_nat_iff]; apply nat.dvd_lcm_left
theorem dvd_lcm_right (a b : ℤ) : b ∣ lcm a b :=
!lcm.comm ▸ !dvd_lcm_left
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (a b : ℤ) : gcd a b * lcm a b = abs (a * b) :=
begin
rewrite [↑gcd, ↑lcm, -of_nat_nat_abs, -of_nat_mul, of_nat_eq_of_nat_iff, nat_abs_mul],
apply nat.gcd_mul_lcm
end
theorem lcm_dvd {a b c : ℤ} : a ∣ c → b ∣ c → lcm a b ∣ c :=
begin
rewrite [↑lcm, -(abs_dvd_iff a), -(abs_dvd_iff b), -*(dvd_abs_iff _ c), -*of_nat_nat_abs],
rewrite [*of_nat_dvd_of_nat_iff] ,
apply nat.lcm_dvd
end
theorem lcm_assoc (a b c : ℤ) : lcm (lcm a b) c = lcm a (lcm b c) :=
dvd.antisymm !lcm_nonneg !lcm_nonneg
(lcm_dvd
(lcm_dvd !dvd_lcm_left (dvd.trans !dvd_lcm_left !dvd_lcm_right))
(dvd.trans !dvd_lcm_right !dvd_lcm_right))
(lcm_dvd
(dvd.trans !dvd_lcm_left !dvd_lcm_left)
(lcm_dvd (dvd.trans !dvd_lcm_right !dvd_lcm_left) !dvd_lcm_right))
/- coprime -/
abbreviation coprime (a b : ℤ) : Prop := gcd a b = 1
theorem coprime_swap {a b : ℤ} (H : coprime b a) : coprime a b :=
!gcd.comm ▸ H
theorem dvd_of_coprime_of_dvd_mul_right {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : coprime c b) (H2 : c ∣ a * b) : c ∣ a :=
assert H3 : gcd (a * c) (a * b) = abs a, from
calc
gcd (a * c) (a * b) = abs a * gcd c b : gcd_mul_left
... = abs a * 1 : H1
... = abs a : mul_one,
assert H4 : (c ∣ gcd (a * c) (a * b)), from dvd_gcd !dvd_mul_left H2,
by rewrite [-dvd_abs_iff, -H3]; apply H4
theorem dvd_of_coprime_of_dvd_mul_left {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : coprime c a) (H2 : c ∣ a * b) : c ∣ b :=
dvd_of_coprime_of_dvd_mul_right H1 (!mul.comm ▸ H2)
theorem gcd_mul_left_cancel_of_coprime {c : ℤ} (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : coprime c b) :
gcd (c * a) b = gcd a b :=
begin
revert H, unfold [coprime, gcd],
rewrite [-of_nat_one],
rewrite [+of_nat_eq_of_nat_iff, nat_abs_mul],
apply nat.gcd_mul_left_cancel_of_coprime,
end
theorem gcd_mul_right_cancel_of_coprime (a : ℤ) {c b : ℤ} (H : coprime c b) :
gcd (a * c) b = gcd a b :=
!mul.comm ▸ !gcd_mul_left_cancel_of_coprime H
theorem gcd_mul_left_cancel_of_coprime_right {c a : ℤ} (b : ℤ) (H : coprime c a) :
gcd a (c * b) = gcd a b :=
!gcd.comm ▸ !gcd.comm ▸ !gcd_mul_left_cancel_of_coprime H
theorem gcd_mul_right_cancel_of_coprime_right {c a : ℤ} (b : ℤ) (H : coprime c a) :
gcd a (b * c) = gcd a b :=
!gcd.comm ▸ !gcd.comm ▸ !gcd_mul_right_cancel_of_coprime H
theorem coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd {a b : ℤ} (H : gcd a b ≠ 0) :
coprime (a / gcd a b) (b / gcd a b) :=
calc
gcd (a / gcd a b) (b / gcd a b)
= gcd a b / abs (gcd a b) : gcd_div !gcd_dvd_left !gcd_dvd_right
... = 1 : by rewrite [abs_of_nonneg !gcd_nonneg, int.div_self H]
theorem not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd {m n d : ℤ} (dgt1 : d > 1) (Hm : d ∣ m) (Hn : d ∣ n) :
¬ coprime m n :=
assume co : coprime m n,
assert d ∣ gcd m n, from dvd_gcd Hm Hn,
have d ∣ 1, by rewrite [↑coprime at co, co at this]; apply this,
have d ≤ 1, from le_of_dvd dec_trivial this,
show false, from not_lt_of_ge `d ≤ 1` `d > 1`
theorem exists_coprime {a b : ℤ} (H : gcd a b ≠ 0) :
exists a' b', coprime a' b' ∧ a = a' * gcd a b ∧ b = b' * gcd a b :=
have H1 : a = (a / gcd a b) * gcd a b, from (int.div_mul_cancel !gcd_dvd_left)⁻¹,
have H2 : b = (b / gcd a b) * gcd a b, from (int.div_mul_cancel !gcd_dvd_right)⁻¹,
exists.intro _ (exists.intro _ (and.intro (coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd H) (and.intro H1 H2)))
theorem coprime_mul {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : coprime a c) (H2 : coprime b c) : coprime (a * b) c :=
calc
gcd (a * b) c = gcd b c : !gcd_mul_left_cancel_of_coprime H1
... = 1 : H2
theorem coprime_mul_right {c a b : ℤ} (H1 : coprime c a) (H2 : coprime c b) : coprime c (a * b) :=
coprime_swap (coprime_mul (coprime_swap H1) (coprime_swap H2))
theorem coprime_of_coprime_mul_left {c a b : ℤ} (H : coprime (c * a) b) : coprime a b :=
have H1 : (gcd a b ∣ gcd (c * a) b), from !gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left,
eq_one_of_dvd_one !gcd_nonneg (H ▸ H1)
theorem coprime_of_coprime_mul_right {c a b : ℤ} (H : coprime (a * c) b) : coprime a b :=
coprime_of_coprime_mul_left (!mul.comm ▸ H)
theorem coprime_of_coprime_mul_left_right {c a b : ℤ} (H : coprime a (c * b)) : coprime a b :=
coprime_swap (coprime_of_coprime_mul_left (coprime_swap H))
theorem coprime_of_coprime_mul_right_right {c a b : ℤ} (H : coprime a (b * c)) : coprime a b :=
coprime_of_coprime_mul_left_right (!mul.comm ▸ H)
theorem exists_eq_prod_and_dvd_and_dvd {a b c : ℤ} (H : c ∣ a * b) :
∃ a' b', c = a' * b' ∧ a' ∣ a ∧ b' ∣ b :=
decidable.by_cases
(suppose gcd c a = 0,
have c = 0, from eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left `gcd c a = 0`,
have a = 0, from eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right `gcd c a = 0`,
have c = 0 * b, from `c = 0` ⬝ !zero_mul⁻¹,
have 0 ∣ a, from `a = 0`⁻¹ ▸ !dvd.refl,
have b ∣ b, from !dvd.refl,
exists.intro _ (exists.intro _ (and.intro `c = 0 * b` (and.intro `0 ∣ a` `b ∣ b`))))
(suppose gcd c a ≠ 0,
have gcd c a ∣ c, from !gcd_dvd_left,
have H3 : c / gcd c a ∣ (a * b) / gcd c a, from div_dvd_div this H,
have H4 : (a * b) / gcd c a = (a / gcd c a) * b, from
calc
a * b / gcd c a = b * a / gcd c a : mul.comm
... = b * (a / gcd c a) : !int.mul_div_assoc !gcd_dvd_right
... = a / gcd c a * b : mul.comm,
have H5 : c / gcd c a ∣ (a / gcd c a) * b, from H4 ▸ H3,
have H6 : coprime (c / gcd c a) (a / gcd c a), from coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd `gcd c a ≠ 0`,
have H7 : c / gcd c a ∣ b, from dvd_of_coprime_of_dvd_mul_left H6 H5,
have H8 : c = gcd c a * (c / gcd c a), from (int.mul_div_cancel' `gcd c a ∣ c`)⁻¹,
exists.intro _ (exists.intro _ (and.intro H8 (and.intro !gcd_dvd_right H7))))
end int
|
03b0adc00d2f3419d300e53987bee09ab7f748b7 | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/linear_algebra/sesquilinear_form.lean | 55fafa0fc1673afd6765dd289b891e4846973dcf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,791 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Andreas Swerdlow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Andreas Swerdlow
-/
import algebra.module.basic
import ring_theory.maps
/-!
# Sesquilinear form
This file defines a sesquilinear form over a module. The definition requires a ring antiautomorphism
on the scalar ring. Basic ideas such as
orthogonality are also introduced.
A sesquilinear form on an `R`-module `M`, is a function from `M × M` to `R, that is linear in the
first argument and antilinear in the second, with respect to an antiautomorphism on `R` (an
antiisomorphism from `R` to `R`).
## Notations
Given any term `S` of type `sesq_form`, due to a coercion, can use the notation `S x y` to
refer to the function field, ie. `S x y = S.sesq x y`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sesquilinear_form#Over_arbitrary_rings>
## Tags
Sesquilinear form,
-/
universes u v
/-- A sesquilinear form over a module -/
structure sesq_form (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [ring R] (I : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ)
[add_comm_group M] [module R M] :=
(sesq : M → M → R)
(sesq_add_left : ∀ (x y z : M), sesq (x + y) z = sesq x z + sesq y z)
(sesq_smul_left : ∀ (a : R) (x y : M), sesq (a • x) y = a * (sesq x y))
(sesq_add_right : ∀ (x y z : M), sesq x (y + z) = sesq x y + sesq x z)
(sesq_smul_right : ∀ (a : R) (x y : M), sesq x (a • y) = (I a).unop * (sesq x y))
namespace sesq_form
section general_ring
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {I : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} {S : sesq_form R M I}
instance : has_coe_to_fun (sesq_form R M I) :=
⟨_, λ S, S.sesq⟩
lemma add_left (x y z : M) : S (x + y) z = S x z + S y z := sesq_add_left S x y z
lemma smul_left (a : R) (x y : M) : S (a • x) y = a * (S x y) := sesq_smul_left S a x y
lemma add_right (x y z : M) : S x (y + z) = S x y + S x z := sesq_add_right S x y z
lemma smul_right (a : R) (x y : M) : S x (a • y) = (I a).unop * (S x y) := sesq_smul_right S a x y
lemma zero_left (x : M) : S 0 x = 0 :=
by { rw [←zero_smul R (0 : M), smul_left, zero_mul] }
lemma zero_right (x : M) : S x 0 = 0 :=
by { rw [←zero_smul R (0 : M), smul_right], simp }
lemma neg_left (x y : M) : S (-x) y = -(S x y) :=
by { rw [←@neg_one_smul R _ _, smul_left, neg_one_mul] }
lemma neg_right (x y : M) : S x (-y) = -(S x y) :=
by { rw [←@neg_one_smul R _ _, smul_right], simp }
lemma sub_left (x y z : M) :
S (x - y) z = S x z - S y z := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_left, neg_left]; refl
lemma sub_right (x y z : M) :
S x (y - z) = S x y - S x z := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_right, neg_right]; refl
variable {D : sesq_form R M I}
@[ext] lemma ext (H : ∀ (x y : M), S x y = D x y) : S = D :=
by {cases S, cases D, congr, funext, exact H _ _}
instance : add_comm_group (sesq_form R M I) :=
{ add := λ S D, { sesq := λ x y, S x y + D x y,
sesq_add_left := λ x y z, by {rw add_left, rw add_left, ac_refl},
sesq_smul_left := λ a x y, by {rw [smul_left, smul_left, mul_add]},
sesq_add_right := λ x y z, by {rw add_right, rw add_right, ac_refl},
sesq_smul_right := λ a x y, by {rw [smul_right, smul_right, mul_add]} },
add_assoc := by {intros, ext,
unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw add_assoc},
zero := { sesq := λ x y, 0,
sesq_add_left := λ x y z, (add_zero 0).symm,
sesq_smul_left := λ a x y, (mul_zero a).symm,
sesq_add_right := λ x y z, (zero_add 0).symm,
sesq_smul_right := λ a x y, (mul_zero (I a).unop).symm },
zero_add := by {intros, ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw zero_add},
add_zero := by {intros, ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw add_zero},
neg := λ S, { sesq := λ x y, - (S.1 x y),
sesq_add_left := λ x y z, by rw [sesq_add_left, neg_add],
sesq_smul_left := λ a x y, by rw [sesq_smul_left, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm],
sesq_add_right := λ x y z, by rw [sesq_add_right, neg_add],
sesq_smul_right := λ a x y, by rw [sesq_smul_right, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm] },
add_left_neg := by {intros, ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw neg_add_self},
add_comm := by {intros, ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw add_comm} }
instance : inhabited (sesq_form R M I) := ⟨0⟩
/-- The proposition that two elements of a sesquilinear form space are orthogonal -/
def is_ortho (S : sesq_form R M I) (x y : M) : Prop :=
S x y = 0
lemma ortho_zero (x : M) :
is_ortho S (0 : M) x := zero_left x
end general_ring
section comm_ring
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{J : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} (F : sesq_form R M J) (f : M → M)
instance to_module : module R (sesq_form R M J) :=
{ smul := λ c S,
{ sesq := λ x y, c * S x y,
sesq_add_left := λ x y z, by {unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq,
rw [sesq_add_left, left_distrib]},
sesq_smul_left := λ a x y, by {unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq,
rw [sesq_smul_left, ←mul_assoc, mul_comm c, mul_assoc]},
sesq_add_right := λ x y z, by {unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq,
rw [sesq_add_right, left_distrib]},
sesq_smul_right := λ a x y, by {unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq,
rw [sesq_smul_right, ←mul_assoc, mul_comm c, mul_assoc], refl} },
smul_add := λ c S D, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw left_distrib},
add_smul := λ c S D, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw right_distrib},
mul_smul := λ a c D, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw mul_assoc},
one_smul := λ S, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw one_mul},
zero_smul := λ S, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw zero_mul},
smul_zero := λ S, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw mul_zero} }
end comm_ring
section domain
variables {R : Type*} [domain R]
{M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{K : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} {G : sesq_form R M K}
theorem ortho_smul_left {x y : M} {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(is_ortho G x y) ↔ (is_ortho G (a • x) y) :=
begin
dunfold is_ortho,
split; intro H,
{ rw [smul_left, H, mul_zero] },
{ rw [smul_left, mul_eq_zero] at H,
cases H,
{ trivial },
{ exact H }}
end
theorem ortho_smul_right {x y : M} {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(is_ortho G x y) ↔ (is_ortho G x (a • y)) :=
begin
dunfold is_ortho,
split; intro H,
{ rw [smul_right, H, mul_zero] },
{ rw [smul_right, mul_eq_zero] at H,
cases H,
{ exfalso,
-- `map_eq_zero_iff` doesn't fire here even if marked as a simp lemma, probably bcecause
-- different instance paths
simp only [opposite.unop_eq_zero_iff] at H,
exact ha (K.map_eq_zero_iff.mp H), },
{ exact H }}
end
end domain
end sesq_form
namespace refl_sesq_form
open refl_sesq_form sesq_form
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {I : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} {S : sesq_form R M I}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear form is reflexive -/
def is_refl (S : sesq_form R M I) : Prop := ∀ (x y : M), S x y = 0 → S y x = 0
variable (H : is_refl S)
lemma eq_zero : ∀ {x y : M}, S x y = 0 → S y x = 0 := λ x y, H x y
lemma ortho_sym {x y : M} :
is_ortho S x y ↔ is_ortho S y x := ⟨eq_zero H, eq_zero H⟩
end refl_sesq_form
namespace sym_sesq_form
open sym_sesq_form sesq_form
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {I : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} {S : sesq_form R M I}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear form is symmetric -/
def is_sym (S : sesq_form R M I) : Prop := ∀ (x y : M), (I (S x y)).unop = S y x
variable (H : is_sym S)
include H
lemma sym (x y : M) : (I (S x y)).unop = S y x := H x y
lemma is_refl : refl_sesq_form.is_refl S := λ x y H1, by { rw [←H], simp [H1], }
lemma ortho_sym {x y : M} :
is_ortho S x y ↔ is_ortho S y x := refl_sesq_form.ortho_sym (is_refl H)
end sym_sesq_form
namespace alt_sesq_form
open alt_sesq_form sesq_form
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {I : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} {S : sesq_form R M I}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear form is alternating -/
def is_alt (S : sesq_form R M I) : Prop := ∀ (x : M), S x x = 0
variable (H : is_alt S)
include H
lemma self_eq_zero (x : M) : S x x = 0 := H x
lemma neg (x y : M) :
- S x y = S y x :=
begin
have H1 : S (x + y) (x + y) = 0,
{ exact self_eq_zero H (x + y) },
rw [add_left, add_right, add_right,
self_eq_zero H, self_eq_zero H, ring.zero_add,
ring.add_zero, add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at H1,
exact H1,
end
end alt_sesq_form
|
8212e9689961a1e1726ae156f0b18973d8658e3b | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /library/data/nat/basic.lean | f2af9cc46fca730bc26911d1c0e9c00fdc28d8ee | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,814 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
Basic operations on the natural numbers.
-/
import ..num algebra.ring
open binary eq.ops
namespace nat
/- a variant of add, defined by recursion on the first argument -/
definition addl (x y : ℕ) : ℕ :=
nat.rec y (λ n r, succ r) x
infix ` ⊕ `:65 := addl
theorem addl_succ_right (n m : ℕ) : n ⊕ succ m = succ (n ⊕ m) :=
nat.induction_on n
rfl
(λ n₁ ih, calc
succ n₁ ⊕ succ m = succ (n₁ ⊕ succ m) : rfl
... = succ (succ (n₁ ⊕ m)) : ih
... = succ (succ n₁ ⊕ m) : rfl)
theorem add_eq_addl (x : ℕ) : ∀y, x + y = x ⊕ y :=
nat.induction_on x
(λ y, nat.induction_on y
rfl
(λ y₁ ih, calc
0 + succ y₁ = succ (0 + y₁) : rfl
... = succ (0 ⊕ y₁) : {ih}
... = 0 ⊕ (succ y₁) : rfl))
(λ x₁ ih₁ y, nat.induction_on y
(calc
succ x₁ + 0 = succ (x₁ + 0) : rfl
... = succ (x₁ ⊕ 0) : {ih₁ 0}
... = succ x₁ ⊕ 0 : rfl)
(λ y₁ ih₂, calc
succ x₁ + succ y₁ = succ (succ x₁ + y₁) : rfl
... = succ (succ x₁ ⊕ y₁) : {ih₂}
... = succ x₁ ⊕ succ y₁ : addl_succ_right))
/- successor and predecessor -/
theorem succ_ne_zero [simp] (n : ℕ) : succ n ≠ 0 :=
by contradiction
theorem add_one_ne_zero [simp] (n : ℕ) : n + 1 ≠ 0 :=
by contradiction
-- add_rewrite succ_ne_zero
theorem pred_zero [simp] : pred 0 = 0 :=
rfl
theorem pred_succ [simp] (n : ℕ) : pred (succ n) = n :=
rfl
theorem eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred (n : ℕ) : n = 0 ∨ n = succ (pred n) :=
nat.induction_on n
(or.inl rfl)
(take m IH, or.inr
(show succ m = succ (pred (succ m)), from congr_arg succ !pred_succ⁻¹))
theorem exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (H : n ≠ 0) : ∃k : ℕ, n = succ k :=
exists.intro _ (or_resolve_right !eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred H)
theorem succ.inj {n m : ℕ} (H : succ n = succ m) : n = m :=
nat.no_confusion H imp.id
abbreviation eq_of_succ_eq_succ := @succ.inj
theorem succ_ne_self {n : ℕ} : succ n ≠ n :=
nat.induction_on n
(take H : 1 = 0,
have ne : 1 ≠ 0, from !succ_ne_zero,
absurd H ne)
(take k IH H, IH (succ.inj H))
theorem discriminate {B : Prop} {n : ℕ} (H1: n = 0 → B) (H2 : ∀m, n = succ m → B) : B :=
have H : n = n → B, from nat.cases_on n H1 H2,
H rfl
theorem two_step_induction_on {P : ℕ → Prop} (a : ℕ) (H1 : P 0) (H2 : P 1)
(H3 : ∀ (n : ℕ) (IH1 : P n) (IH2 : P (succ n)), P (succ (succ n))) : P a :=
have stronger : P a ∧ P (succ a), from
nat.induction_on a
(and.intro H1 H2)
(take k IH,
have IH1 : P k, from and.elim_left IH,
have IH2 : P (succ k), from and.elim_right IH,
and.intro IH2 (H3 k IH1 IH2)),
and.elim_left stronger
theorem sub_induction {P : ℕ → ℕ → Prop} (n m : ℕ) (H1 : ∀m, P 0 m)
(H2 : ∀n, P (succ n) 0) (H3 : ∀n m, P n m → P (succ n) (succ m)) : P n m :=
have general : ∀m, P n m, from nat.induction_on n H1
(take k : ℕ,
assume IH : ∀m, P k m,
take m : ℕ,
nat.cases_on m (H2 k) (take l, (H3 k l (IH l)))),
general m
/- addition -/
protected theorem add_zero (n : ℕ) : n + 0 = n :=
rfl
theorem add_succ (n m : ℕ) : n + succ m = succ (n + m) :=
rfl
/-
Remark: we use 'local attributes' because in the end of the file
we show not is a comm_semiring, and we will automatically inherit
the associated [simp] lemmas from algebra
-/
local attribute nat.add_zero nat.add_succ [simp]
protected theorem zero_add (n : ℕ) : 0 + n = n :=
by rec_simp
theorem succ_add (n m : ℕ) : (succ n) + m = succ (n + m) :=
by rec_simp
local attribute nat.zero_add nat.succ_add [simp]
protected theorem add_comm (n m : ℕ) : n + m = m + n :=
by rec_simp
theorem succ_add_eq_succ_add (n m : ℕ) : succ n + m = n + succ m :=
by simp
protected theorem add_assoc (n m k : ℕ) : (n + m) + k = n + (m + k) :=
by rec_simp
protected theorem add_left_comm : Π (n m k : ℕ), n + (m + k) = m + (n + k) :=
left_comm nat.add_comm nat.add_assoc
local attribute nat.add_comm nat.add_assoc nat.add_left_comm [simp]
protected theorem add_right_comm : Π (n m k : ℕ), n + m + k = n + k + m :=
right_comm nat.add_comm nat.add_assoc
protected theorem add_left_cancel {n m k : ℕ} : n + m = n + k → m = k :=
nat.induction_on n
(by simp)
(take a iH,
-- TODO(Leo): replace with forward reasoning after we add strategies for it.
have succ (a + m) = succ (a + k) → a + m = a + k, from !succ.inj,
by inst_simp)
protected theorem add_right_cancel {n m k : ℕ} (H : n + m = k + m) : n = k :=
have H2 : m + n = m + k, by simp,
nat.add_left_cancel H2
theorem eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right {n m : ℕ} : n + m = 0 → n = 0 :=
nat.induction_on n
(by simp)
(take k iH, assume H : succ k + m = 0,
absurd
(show succ (k + m) = 0, by simp)
!succ_ne_zero)
theorem eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left {n m : ℕ} (H : n + m = 0) : m = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right (!nat.add_comm ⬝ H)
theorem eq_zero_and_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {n m : ℕ} (H : n + m = 0) : n = 0 ∧ m = 0 :=
and.intro (eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right H) (eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left H)
theorem add_one (n : ℕ) : n + 1 = succ n := rfl
local attribute add_one [simp]
theorem one_add (n : ℕ) : 1 + n = succ n :=
by simp
theorem succ_eq_add_one (n : ℕ) : succ n = n + 1 :=
rfl
/- multiplication -/
protected theorem mul_zero (n : ℕ) : n * 0 = 0 :=
rfl
theorem mul_succ (n m : ℕ) : n * succ m = n * m + n :=
rfl
local attribute nat.mul_zero nat.mul_succ [simp]
-- commutativity, distributivity, associativity, identity
protected theorem zero_mul (n : ℕ) : 0 * n = 0 :=
by rec_simp
theorem succ_mul (n m : ℕ) : (succ n) * m = (n * m) + m :=
by rec_simp
local attribute nat.zero_mul nat.succ_mul [simp]
protected theorem mul_comm (n m : ℕ) : n * m = m * n :=
by rec_simp
protected theorem right_distrib (n m k : ℕ) : (n + m) * k = n * k + m * k :=
by rec_simp
protected theorem left_distrib (n m k : ℕ) : n * (m + k) = n * m + n * k :=
by rec_simp
local attribute nat.mul_comm nat.right_distrib nat.left_distrib [simp]
protected theorem mul_assoc (n m k : ℕ) : (n * m) * k = n * (m * k) :=
by rec_simp
local attribute nat.mul_assoc [simp]
protected theorem mul_one (n : ℕ) : n * 1 = n :=
calc
n * 1 = n * 0 + n : mul_succ
... = n : by simp
local attribute nat.mul_one [simp]
protected theorem one_mul (n : ℕ) : 1 * n = n :=
by simp
local attribute nat.one_mul [simp]
theorem eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {n m : ℕ} : n * m = 0 → n = 0 ∨ m = 0 :=
nat.cases_on n (by simp)
(take n',
nat.cases_on m
(by simp)
(take m', assume H,
absurd
(show succ (succ n' * m' + n') = 0, by simp)
!succ_ne_zero))
protected definition comm_semiring [trans_instance] : comm_semiring nat :=
⦃comm_semiring,
add := nat.add,
add_assoc := nat.add_assoc,
zero := nat.zero,
zero_add := nat.zero_add,
add_zero := nat.add_zero,
add_comm := nat.add_comm,
mul := nat.mul,
mul_assoc := nat.mul_assoc,
one := nat.succ nat.zero,
one_mul := nat.one_mul,
mul_one := nat.mul_one,
left_distrib := nat.left_distrib,
right_distrib := nat.right_distrib,
zero_mul := nat.zero_mul,
mul_zero := nat.mul_zero,
mul_comm := nat.mul_comm⦄
end nat
section
open nat
definition iterate {A : Type} (op : A → A) : ℕ → A → A
| 0 := λ a, a
| (succ k) := λ a, op (iterate k a)
notation f`^[`n`]` := iterate f n
end
|
37f0ddc7ce6c6e3ad1b7e3e9793ab8de3e6367fc | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/special_functions/complex/log.lean | 6cfc8259a4ca4704ab23213901d3697dcc1d42e7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,308 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import analysis.special_functions.complex.arg
import analysis.special_functions.log.basic
/-!
# The complex `log` function
Basic properties, relationship with `exp`.
-/
noncomputable theory
namespace complex
open set filter
open_locale real topological_space complex_conjugate
/-- Inverse of the `exp` function. Returns values such that `(log x).im > - π` and `(log x).im ≤ π`.
`log 0 = 0`-/
@[pp_nodot] noncomputable def log (x : ℂ) : ℂ := x.abs.log + arg x * I
lemma log_re (x : ℂ) : x.log.re = x.abs.log := by simp [log]
lemma log_im (x : ℂ) : x.log.im = x.arg := by simp [log]
lemma neg_pi_lt_log_im (x : ℂ) : -π < (log x).im := by simp only [log_im, neg_pi_lt_arg]
lemma log_im_le_pi (x : ℂ) : (log x).im ≤ π := by simp only [log_im, arg_le_pi]
lemma exp_log {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = x :=
by rw [log, exp_add_mul_I, ← of_real_sin, sin_arg, ← of_real_cos, cos_arg hx,
← of_real_exp, real.exp_log (abs.pos hx), mul_add, of_real_div, of_real_div,
mul_div_cancel' _ (of_real_ne_zero.2 $ abs.ne_zero hx), ← mul_assoc,
mul_div_cancel' _ (of_real_ne_zero.2 $ abs.ne_zero hx), re_add_im]
@[simp] lemma range_exp : range exp = {0}ᶜ :=
set.ext $ λ x, ⟨by { rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩, exact exp_ne_zero x }, λ hx, ⟨log x, exp_log hx⟩⟩
lemma log_exp {x : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂: x.im ≤ π) : log (exp x) = x :=
by rw [log, abs_exp, real.log_exp, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, ← of_real_exp,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (real.exp_pos _) ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, re_add_im]
lemma exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi {x y : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂ : x.im ≤ π)
(hy₁ : - π < y.im) (hy₂ : y.im ≤ π) (hxy : exp x = exp y) : x = y :=
by rw [← log_exp hx₁ hx₂, ← log_exp hy₁ hy₂, hxy]
lemma of_real_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (x.log : ℂ) = log x :=
complex.ext
(by rw [log_re, of_real_re, abs_of_nonneg hx])
(by rw [of_real_im, log_im, arg_of_real_of_nonneg hx])
lemma log_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : (log (x : ℂ)).re = real.log x := by simp [log_re]
lemma log_of_real_mul {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
log (r * x) = real.log r + log x :=
begin
replace hx := complex.abs.ne_zero_iff.mpr hx,
simp_rw [log, map_mul, abs_of_real, arg_real_mul _ hr, abs_of_pos hr, real.log_mul hr.ne' hx,
of_real_add, add_assoc],
end
lemma log_mul_of_real (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
log (x * r) = real.log r + log x :=
by rw [mul_comm, log_of_real_mul hr hx, add_comm]
@[simp] lemma log_zero : log 0 = 0 := by simp [log]
@[simp] lemma log_one : log 1 = 0 := by simp [log]
lemma log_neg_one : log (-1) = π * I := by simp [log]
lemma log_I : log I = π / 2 * I := by simp [log]
lemma log_neg_I : log (-I) = -(π / 2) * I := by simp [log]
lemma log_conj_eq_ite (x : ℂ) :
log (conj x) = if x.arg = π then log x else conj (log x) :=
begin
simp_rw [log, abs_conj, arg_conj, map_add, map_mul, conj_of_real],
split_ifs with hx,
{ rw hx },
simp_rw [of_real_neg, conj_I, mul_neg, neg_mul]
end
lemma log_conj (x : ℂ) (h : x.arg ≠ π) : log (conj x) = conj (log x) :=
by rw [log_conj_eq_ite, if_neg h]
lemma log_inv_eq_ite (x : ℂ) : log (x⁻¹) = if x.arg = π then -conj (log x) else -log x :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ simp [hx] },
rw [inv_def, log_mul_of_real, real.log_inv, of_real_neg, ←sub_eq_neg_add, log_conj_eq_ite],
{ simp_rw [log, map_add, map_mul, conj_of_real, conj_I, norm_sq_eq_abs, real.log_pow,
nat.cast_two, of_real_mul, of_real_bit0, of_real_one, neg_add, mul_neg, two_mul, neg_neg],
split_ifs,
{ rw [add_sub_right_comm, sub_add_cancel'] },
{ rw [add_sub_right_comm, sub_add_cancel'] } },
{ rwa [inv_pos, complex.norm_sq_pos] },
{ rwa map_ne_zero },
end
lemma log_inv (x : ℂ) (hx : x.arg ≠ π) : log (x⁻¹) = -log x :=
by rw [log_inv_eq_ite, if_neg hx]
lemma two_pi_I_ne_zero : (2 * π * I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
by norm_num [real.pi_ne_zero, I_ne_zero]
lemma exp_eq_one_iff {x : ℂ} : exp x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = n * ((2 * π) * I) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
rcases exists_unique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc real.two_pi_pos x.im (-π) with ⟨n, hn, -⟩,
use -n,
rw [int.cast_neg, neg_mul, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero],
have : (x + n * (2 * π * I)).im ∈ Ioc (-π) π, by simpa [two_mul, mul_add] using hn,
rw [← log_exp this.1 this.2, exp_periodic.int_mul n, h, log_one] },
{ rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩, exact (exp_periodic.int_mul n).eq.trans exp_zero }
end
lemma exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one {x y : ℂ} : exp x = exp y ↔ exp (x - y) = 1 :=
by rw [exp_sub, div_eq_one_iff_eq (exp_ne_zero _)]
lemma exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int {x y : ℂ} : exp x = exp y ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = y + n * ((2 * π) * I) :=
by simp only [exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one, exp_eq_one_iff, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
@[simp] lemma countable_preimage_exp {s : set ℂ} : (exp ⁻¹' s).countable ↔ s.countable :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hs, _, λ hs, _⟩,
{ refine ((hs.image exp).insert 0).mono _,
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_exp, ← diff_eq, ← union_singleton, diff_union_self],
exact subset_union_left _ _ },
{ rw ← bUnion_preimage_singleton,
refine hs.bUnion (λ z hz, _),
rcases em (∃ w, exp w = z) with ⟨w, rfl⟩|hne,
{ simp only [preimage, mem_singleton_iff, exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int, set_of_exists],
exact countable_Union (λ m, countable_singleton _) },
{ push_neg at hne, simp [preimage, hne] } }
end
alias countable_preimage_exp ↔ _ _root_.set.countable.preimage_cexp
lemma tendsto_log_nhds_within_im_neg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero
{z : ℂ} (hre : z.re < 0) (him : z.im = 0) :
tendsto log (𝓝[{z : ℂ | z.im < 0}] z) (𝓝 $ real.log (abs z) - π * I) :=
begin
have := (continuous_of_real.continuous_at.comp_continuous_within_at
(continuous_abs.continuous_within_at.log _)).tendsto.add
(((continuous_of_real.tendsto _).comp $
tendsto_arg_nhds_within_im_neg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero hre him).mul tendsto_const_nhds),
convert this,
{ simp [sub_eq_add_neg] },
{ lift z to ℝ using him, simpa using hre.ne }
end
lemma continuous_within_at_log_of_re_neg_of_im_zero
{z : ℂ} (hre : z.re < 0) (him : z.im = 0) :
continuous_within_at log {z : ℂ | 0 ≤ z.im} z :=
begin
have := (continuous_of_real.continuous_at.comp_continuous_within_at
(continuous_abs.continuous_within_at.log _)).tendsto.add
((continuous_of_real.continuous_at.comp_continuous_within_at $
continuous_within_at_arg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero hre him).mul tendsto_const_nhds),
convert this,
{ lift z to ℝ using him, simpa using hre.ne }
end
lemma tendsto_log_nhds_within_im_nonneg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero
{z : ℂ} (hre : z.re < 0) (him : z.im = 0) :
tendsto log (𝓝[{z : ℂ | 0 ≤ z.im}] z) (𝓝 $ real.log (abs z) + π * I) :=
by simpa only [log, arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩]
using (continuous_within_at_log_of_re_neg_of_im_zero hre him).tendsto
@[simp] lemma map_exp_comap_re_at_bot : map exp (comap re at_bot) = 𝓝[≠] 0 :=
by rw [← comap_exp_nhds_zero, map_comap, range_exp, nhds_within]
@[simp] lemma map_exp_comap_re_at_top : map exp (comap re at_top) = comap abs at_top :=
begin
rw [← comap_exp_comap_abs_at_top, map_comap, range_exp, inf_eq_left, le_principal_iff],
exact eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top tendsto_comap 0
end
end complex
section log_deriv
open complex filter
open_locale topological_space
variables {α : Type*}
lemma continuous_at_clog {x : ℂ} (h : 0 < x.re ∨ x.im ≠ 0) :
continuous_at log x :=
begin
refine continuous_at.add _ _,
{ refine continuous_of_real.continuous_at.comp _,
refine (real.continuous_at_log _).comp complex.continuous_abs.continuous_at,
rw complex.abs.ne_zero_iff,
rintro rfl,
simpa using h },
{ have h_cont_mul : continuous (λ x : ℂ, x * I), from continuous_id'.mul continuous_const,
refine h_cont_mul.continuous_at.comp (continuous_of_real.continuous_at.comp _),
exact continuous_at_arg h, },
end
lemma filter.tendsto.clog {l : filter α} {f : α → ℂ} {x : ℂ} (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 x))
(hx : 0 < x.re ∨ x.im ≠ 0) :
tendsto (λ t, log (f t)) l (𝓝 $ log x) :=
(continuous_at_clog hx).tendsto.comp h
variables [topological_space α]
lemma continuous_at.clog {f : α → ℂ} {x : α} (h₁ : continuous_at f x)
(h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
continuous_at (λ t, log (f t)) x :=
h₁.clog h₂
lemma continuous_within_at.clog {f : α → ℂ} {s : set α} {x : α} (h₁ : continuous_within_at f s x)
(h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
continuous_within_at (λ t, log (f t)) s x :=
h₁.clog h₂
lemma continuous_on.clog {f : α → ℂ} {s : set α} (h₁ : continuous_on f s)
(h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
continuous_on (λ t, log (f t)) s :=
λ x hx, (h₁ x hx).clog (h₂ x hx)
lemma continuous.clog {f : α → ℂ} (h₁ : continuous f) (h₂ : ∀ x, 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
continuous (λ t, log (f t)) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, h₁.continuous_at.clog (h₂ x)
end log_deriv
|
2a8fbe05c91589878604ad85cef5ccf01bf77d18 | 9cba98daa30c0804090f963f9024147a50292fa0 | /phys.lean | f6b5f0f0f53a151477da07beee72253c5b3f9e4e | [] | no_license | kevinsullivan/phys | dcb192f7b3033797541b980f0b4a7e75d84cea1a | ebc2df3779d3605ff7a9b47eeda25c2a551e011f | refs/heads/master | 1,637,490,575,500 | 1,629,899,064,000 | 1,629,899,064,000 | 168,012,884 | 0 | 3 | null | 1,629,644,436,000 | 1,548,699,832,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 36 | lean | import .time.time
import .geom.geom
|
caa5654640370a6a271caea279a4291a284ea3bc | b392eb79fb36952401156496daa60628ccb07438 | /MathPort/ParseExport.lean | c4657f7badcf9478b926fe49c1373df5107b96e1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AurelienSaue/mathportsource | d9eabe74e3ab7774baa6a10a6dc8d4855ff92266 | 1a164e4fff7204c522c1f4ecc5024fd909be3b0b | refs/heads/master | 1,685,214,377,305 | 1,623,621,223,000 | 1,623,621,223,000 | 364,191,042 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,157 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Daniel Selsam, Gabriel Ebner
-/
import MathPort.Util
import MathPort.Basic
import MathPort.ActionItem
import Lean
import Std.Data.HashSet
import Std.Data.HashMap
namespace MathPort
open Lean
private def nat2expr (i : Nat) : PortM Expr := do
let s ← get
if i < s.exprs.size then return s.exprs[i]
throwError s!"[nat2expr] {i} > {s.exprs.size}"
private def nat2level (i : Nat) : PortM Level := do
let s ← get
if i < s.levels.size then return s.levels[i]
throwError s!"[nat2level] {i} > {s.levels.size}"
private def nat2name (i : Nat) : PortM Name := do
let s ← get
if i < s.names.size then return s.names[i]
throwError s!"[nat2name] {i} > {s.names.size}"
private def parseNat (s : String) : PortM Nat :=
match s.toNat? with
| some k => pure k
| none => throwError s!"String '{s}' cannot be converted to Nat"
private def parseBool (s : String) : PortM Bool :=
match s.toNat? with
| some k =>
if k == 1 then true
else if k == 0 then false
else throwError s!"String '{s}' cannot be converted to Bool"
| none => throwError s!"String '{s}' cannot be converted to Bool"
private def parseHints (s : String) : PortM ReducibilityHints := do
match s with
| "A" => ReducibilityHints.abbrev
| "O" => ReducibilityHints.opaque
| _ =>
let n ← parseNat s
let k := n % UInt32.size
ReducibilityHints.regular ⟨⟨k, sorryAx (Less k UInt32.size)⟩⟩
private def parseMixfixKind (kind : String) : PortM MixfixKind :=
match kind with
| "prefix" => pure MixfixKind.prefix
| "postfix" => pure MixfixKind.postfix
| "infixl" => pure MixfixKind.infixl
| "infixr" => pure MixfixKind.infixr
| "singleton" => pure MixfixKind.singleton
| _ => throwError s!"invalid mixfix kind {kind}"
private def str2expr (s : String) : PortM Expr := parseNat s >>= nat2expr
private def str2level (s : String) : PortM Level := parseNat s >>= nat2level
private def str2name (s : String) : PortM Name := parseNat s >>= nat2name
private def writeName (i : String) (n : Name) : PortM Unit := do
let i ← parseNat i
modify $ λ s => { s with names := s.names.write i n }
private def writeLevel (i : String) (l : Level) : PortM Unit := do
let i ← parseNat i
modify $ λ s => { s with levels := s.levels.write i l }
private def writeExpr (i : String) (e : Expr) : PortM Unit := do
let i ← parseNat i
modify $ λ s => { s with exprs := s.exprs.write i e }
private def parseReducibilityStatus : String → PortM ReducibilityStatus
| "Reducible" => ReducibilityStatus.reducible
| "Semireducible" => ReducibilityStatus.semireducible
| "Irreducible" => ReducibilityStatus.irreducible
| s => throwError s!"unknown reducibility status {s}"
def processLine (line : String) : PortM (List ActionItem) := do
let tokens := line.splitOn " "
match tokens with
| [] => throwError "[processLine] line has no tokens"
| (t::_) => if t.isNat then processTerm tokens *> pure []
else processMisc tokens
where
processTerm (tokens : List String) : PortM Unit := do
match tokens with
| (i :: "#NS" :: j :: rest) => writeName i $ (← str2name j).mkStr (" ".intercalate rest)
| [i, "#NI", j, k] => writeName i $ (← str2name j).mkNum (← parseNat k)
| [i, "#US", j] => writeLevel i $ mkLevelSucc (← str2level j)
| [i, "#UM", j₁, j₂] => writeLevel i $ mkLevelMax (← str2level j₁) (← str2level j₂)
| [i, "#UIM", j₁, j₂] => writeLevel i $ mkLevelIMax (← str2level j₁) (← str2level j₂)
| [i, "#UP", j] => writeLevel i $ mkLevelParam (← str2name j)
| [i, "#EV", j] => writeExpr i $ mkBVar (← parseNat j)
| [i, "#ES", j] => writeExpr i $ mkSort (← str2level j)
| (i :: "#EC" :: j :: us) => writeExpr i $ mkConst (← str2name j) (← us.mapM str2level)
| [i, "#EA", j₁, j₂] => writeExpr i $ mkApp (← str2expr j₁) (← str2expr j₂)
| [i, "#EL", bi, j₁, j₂, j₃] => writeExpr i $ mkLambda (← str2name j₁) (← parseBinderInfo bi) (← str2expr j₂) (← str2expr j₃)
| [i, "#EP", bi, j₁, j₂, j₃] => writeExpr i $ mkForall (← str2name j₁) (← parseBinderInfo bi) (← str2expr j₂) (← str2expr j₃)
| [i, "#EZ", j₁, j₂, j₃, j₄] => writeExpr i $ mkLet (← str2name j₁) (← str2expr j₂) (← str2expr j₃) (← str2expr j₄)
| _ => throwError s!"[processTerm] unexpected '{tokens}'"
processMisc (tokens : List String) : PortM (List ActionItem) := do
match tokens with
| ("#AX" :: n :: t :: ups) =>
let (n, t, ups) ← ((← str2name n), (← str2expr t), (← ups.mapM str2name))
pure [ActionItem.decl $ Declaration.axiomDecl {
name := n,
levelParams := ups,
type := t,
isUnsafe := false,
}]
| ("#DEF" :: n :: thm :: h :: t :: v :: ups) =>
let (n, h, t, v, ups) ← ((← str2name n), (← parseHints h), (← str2expr t), (← str2expr v), (← ups.mapM str2name))
let thm := (← parseNat thm) > 0
if thm then
pure [ActionItem.decl $ Declaration.thmDecl {
name := n,
levelParams := ups,
type := t,
value := v
}]
else
pure [ActionItem.decl $ Declaration.defnDecl {
name := n,
levelParams := ups,
type := t,
value := v,
safety := DefinitionSafety.safe, -- TODO: confirm only safe things are being exported
hints := h,
}]
| ("#IND" :: nps :: n :: t :: nis :: rest) =>
let (nps, n, t, nis) ← ((← parseNat nps), (← str2name n), (← str2expr t), (← parseNat nis))
let (is, ups) := rest.splitAt (2 * nis)
let lparams ← ups.mapM str2name
let ctors ← parseIntros is
pure [ActionItem.decl $ Declaration.inductDecl lparams nps [{
name := n,
type := t,
ctors := ctors
}] false]
| ["#QUOT"] => pure []
| ("#MIXFIX" :: kind :: n :: prec :: tok) => pure [ActionItem.mixfix (← parseMixfixKind kind) (← str2name n) (← parseNat prec) (" ".intercalate tok)]
| ["#PRIVATE", pretty, real] => pure [ActionItem.private (← str2name pretty) (← str2name real)]
| ["#PROTECTED", n] => pure [ActionItem.protected (← str2name n)]
| ["#POS_INFO", n, line, col] => do
let line ← parseNat line
let col ← parseNat col
let name ← str2name n
pure [ActionItem.position name line col]
-- TODO: look at the 'deleted' bit
| ("#ATTR" :: a :: p :: n :: _ :: rest) => do
let attrName ← str2name a
if attrName == "simp" then
pure [ActionItem.simp (← str2name n) (← parseNat p)]
else if attrName == "reducibility" then
match rest with
| [status] => pure [ActionItem.reducibility (← str2name n) (← parseReducibilityStatus status)]
| _ => throwError s!"[reducibility] expected name"
else
pure []
| ["#CLASS", c] => pure [ActionItem.class (← str2name c)]
| ["#CLASS_INSTANCE", c, i, p] => pure [ActionItem.instance (← str2name c) (← str2name i) (← parseNat p)]
| ("#CLASS_TRACK_ATTR" :: _) => pure []
| ("#AUXREC" :: _) => pure []
| ("#NEW_NAMESPACE" :: _) => pure []
| ("#NONCOMPUTABLE" :: _) => pure []
| ("#NOCONF" :: _) => pure []
| ("#TOKEN" :: _) => pure []
| ("#USER_ATTR" :: _) => pure []
| ["#PROJECTION", proj, mk, nParams, i, ii] => do
pure [ActionItem.projection {
projName := ← str2name proj,
ctorName := ← str2name mk,
nParams := ← parseNat nParams,
index := ← parseNat i,
fromClass := ← parseBool ii
}]
| ("#EXPORT_DECL" :: currNs :: ns :: nsAs :: hadExplicit :: nRenames :: rest) => do
let rest := rest.toArray
let nRenames ← parseNat nRenames
let mut renames := #[]
for i in [:nRenames] do
let n1 ← str2name rest[2*i]
let n2 ← str2name rest[2*i+1]
renames := renames.push (n1, n2)
let nExcepts ← parseNat rest[2*nRenames]
let offset := (2 * nRenames + 1)
let mut exceptNames := #[]
for i in [:nExcepts] do
exceptNames := exceptNames.push $ ← str2name rest[offset + i]
let exportDecl : ExportDecl := {
currNs := (← str2name currNs),
ns := (← str2name ns),
nsAs := (← str2name nsAs),
hadExplicit := (← parseNat hadExplicit) > 0,
renames := renames,
exceptNames := exceptNames
}
pure [ActionItem.export exportDecl]
| _ =>
println! "[processLine] unexpected case: '{line}'\n{tokens}"
pure []
parseIntros : List String → PortM (List Constructor)
| (n :: t :: is) => do
let rest ← parseIntros is
pure $ { name := (← str2name n), type := ← str2expr t } :: rest
| _ => []
parseBinderInfo : String → PortM BinderInfo
| "#BD" => BinderInfo.default
| "#BI" => BinderInfo.implicit
| "#BS" =>
-- Lean4 is missing support for strictImplicit, so we convert here
BinderInfo.implicit -- BinderInfo.strictImplicit
| "#BC" => BinderInfo.instImplicit
| s => throwError s!"[parseBinderInfo] unexpected: {s}"
end MathPort
|
6da881495e8ce6106bb8a8a9dc314f0c07d050b8 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/simpInv.lean | dee2465f98317b30ad462cb4af3f09a1dabb57ea | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 383 | lean | opaque g (x y : Nat) : Nat
opaque f (x y : Nat) : Nat
axiom f_def (x y : Nat) : f x y = g x y
axiom f_ax (x : Nat) : f x x = x
theorem ex1 (x : Nat) : g x x = x := by
simp [← f_def, f_ax]
opaque p (x y : Nat) : Prop
opaque q (x y : Nat) : Prop
axiom p_def (x y : Nat) : p x y ↔ q x y
axiom p_ax (x : Nat) : p x x
theorem ex2 (x : Nat) : q x x := by
simp [← p_def, p_ax]
|
894c28f4951cec8cdb9f625cfc2dc9259cb58fd6 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/begin_end_bug.lean | df3a2299b1cfbc778f52d051fdb9bc953f6bbebb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 174 | lean | example (a b c : nat) : a = b → a = c → b = c :=
assume hab hac,
have b = a, begin trace a, symmetry, assumption end,
begin
transitivity,
exact this,
exact hac
end
|
e940d1b265d9529922d3fa1faf18585af3227541 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/data/list/indexes.lean | 04cc869a348cab7e95586860bdeec286fac05292 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,600 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jannis Limperg. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jannis Limperg
-/
import data.list.range
/-!
# Lemmas about list.*_with_index functions.
Some specification lemmas for `list.map_with_index`, `list.mmap_with_index`, `list.foldl_with_index`
and `list.foldr_with_index`.
-/
universes u v
open function
namespace list
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
section map_with_index
lemma map_with_index_core_eq (l : list α) (f : ℕ → α → β) (n : ℕ) :
l.map_with_index_core f n = l.map_with_index (λ i a, f (i + n) a) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing f n,
{ simp [map_with_index, map_with_index_core] },
{ rw [map_with_index],
simp [map_with_index_core, hl, add_left_comm, add_assoc, add_comm] }
end
lemma map_with_index_eq_enum_map (l : list α) (f : ℕ → α → β) :
l.map_with_index f = l.enum.map (function.uncurry f) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing f,
{ simp [map_with_index, map_with_index_core, list.enum_eq_zip_range] },
{ rw [map_with_index, map_with_index_core, map_with_index_core_eq, hl],
simp [enum_eq_zip_range, range_succ_eq_map, zip_with_map_left,
map_uncurry_zip_eq_zip_with] }
end
end map_with_index
section foldr_with_index
/-- Specification of `foldr_with_index_aux`. -/
def foldr_with_index_aux_spec (f : ℕ → α → β → β) (start : ℕ) (b : β)
(as : list α) : β :=
foldr (uncurry f) b $ enum_from start as
theorem foldr_with_index_aux_spec_cons (f : ℕ → α → β → β) (start b a as) :
foldr_with_index_aux_spec f start b (a :: as) =
f start a (foldr_with_index_aux_spec f (start + 1) b as) :=
rfl
theorem foldr_with_index_aux_eq_foldr_with_index_aux_spec (f : ℕ → α → β → β)
(start b as) :
foldr_with_index_aux f start b as = foldr_with_index_aux_spec f start b as :=
begin
induction as generalizing start,
{ refl },
{ simp only [foldr_with_index_aux, foldr_with_index_aux_spec_cons, *] }
end
theorem foldr_with_index_eq_foldr_enum (f : ℕ → α → β → β) (b : β) (as : list α) :
foldr_with_index f b as = foldr (uncurry f) b (enum as) :=
by simp only
[foldr_with_index, foldr_with_index_aux_spec,
foldr_with_index_aux_eq_foldr_with_index_aux_spec, enum]
end foldr_with_index
theorem indexes_values_eq_filter_enum (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
(as : list α) :
indexes_values p as = filter (p ∘ prod.snd) (enum as) :=
by simp [indexes_values, foldr_with_index_eq_foldr_enum, uncurry, filter_eq_foldr]
theorem find_indexes_eq_map_indexes_values (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
(as : list α) :
find_indexes p as = map prod.fst (indexes_values p as) :=
by simp only
[indexes_values_eq_filter_enum, map_filter_eq_foldr, find_indexes,
foldr_with_index_eq_foldr_enum, uncurry]
section foldl_with_index
/-- Specification of `foldl_with_index_aux`. -/
def foldl_with_index_aux_spec (f : ℕ → α → β → α) (start : ℕ) (a : α)
(bs : list β) : α :=
foldl (λ a (p : ℕ × β), f p.fst a p.snd) a $ enum_from start bs
theorem foldl_with_index_aux_spec_cons (f : ℕ → α → β → α) (start a b bs) :
foldl_with_index_aux_spec f start a (b :: bs) =
foldl_with_index_aux_spec f (start + 1) (f start a b) bs :=
rfl
theorem foldl_with_index_aux_eq_foldl_with_index_aux_spec (f : ℕ → α → β → α)
(start a bs) :
foldl_with_index_aux f start a bs = foldl_with_index_aux_spec f start a bs :=
begin
induction bs generalizing start a,
{ refl },
{ simp [foldl_with_index_aux, foldl_with_index_aux_spec_cons, *] }
end
theorem foldl_with_index_eq_foldl_enum (f : ℕ → α → β → α) (a : α) (bs : list β) :
foldl_with_index f a bs =
foldl (λ a (p : ℕ × β), f p.fst a p.snd) a (enum bs) :=
by simp only
[foldl_with_index, foldl_with_index_aux_spec,
foldl_with_index_aux_eq_foldl_with_index_aux_spec, enum]
end foldl_with_index
section mfold_with_index
variables {m : Type u → Type v} [monad m]
theorem mfoldr_with_index_eq_mfoldr_enum {α β} (f : ℕ → α → β → m β) (b : β) (as : list α) :
mfoldr_with_index f b as = mfoldr (uncurry f) b (enum as) :=
by simp only
[mfoldr_with_index, mfoldr_eq_foldr, foldr_with_index_eq_foldr_enum, uncurry]
theorem mfoldl_with_index_eq_mfoldl_enum [is_lawful_monad m] {α β}
(f : ℕ → β → α → m β) (b : β) (as : list α) :
mfoldl_with_index f b as =
mfoldl (λ b (p : ℕ × α), f p.fst b p.snd) b (enum as) :=
by rw [mfoldl_with_index, mfoldl_eq_foldl, foldl_with_index_eq_foldl_enum]
end mfold_with_index
section mmap_with_index
variables {m : Type u → Type v} [applicative m]
/-- Specification of `mmap_with_index_aux`. -/
def mmap_with_index_aux_spec {α β} (f : ℕ → α → m β) (start : ℕ) (as : list α) :
m (list β) :=
list.traverse (uncurry f) $ enum_from start as
-- Note: `traverse` the class method would require a less universe-polymorphic
-- `m : Type u → Type u`.
theorem mmap_with_index_aux_spec_cons {α β} (f : ℕ → α → m β) (start : ℕ)
(a : α) (as : list α) :
mmap_with_index_aux_spec f start (a :: as) =
list.cons <$> f start a <*> mmap_with_index_aux_spec f (start + 1) as :=
rfl
theorem mmap_with_index_aux_eq_mmap_with_index_aux_spec {α β} (f : ℕ → α → m β)
(start : ℕ) (as : list α) :
mmap_with_index_aux f start as = mmap_with_index_aux_spec f start as :=
begin
induction as generalizing start,
{ refl },
{ simp [mmap_with_index_aux, mmap_with_index_aux_spec_cons, *] }
end
theorem mmap_with_index_eq_mmap_enum {α β} (f : ℕ → α → m β) (as : list α) :
mmap_with_index f as = list.traverse (uncurry f) (enum as) :=
by simp only
[mmap_with_index, mmap_with_index_aux_spec,
mmap_with_index_aux_eq_mmap_with_index_aux_spec, enum ]
end mmap_with_index
section mmap_with_index'
variables {m : Type u → Type v} [applicative m] [is_lawful_applicative m]
theorem mmap_with_index'_aux_eq_mmap_with_index_aux {α} (f : ℕ → α → m punit)
(start : ℕ) (as : list α) :
mmap_with_index'_aux f start as =
mmap_with_index_aux f start as *> pure punit.star :=
by induction as generalizing start;
simp [mmap_with_index'_aux, mmap_with_index_aux, *, seq_right_eq, const, -comp_const]
with functor_norm
theorem mmap_with_index'_eq_mmap_with_index {α} (f : ℕ → α → m punit) (as : list α) :
mmap_with_index' f as = mmap_with_index f as *> pure punit.star :=
by apply mmap_with_index'_aux_eq_mmap_with_index_aux
end mmap_with_index'
end list
|
6bd621aadf08c32954e926bec630ea04ea1a4a3c | 46125763b4dbf50619e8846a1371029346f4c3db | /src/data/set/finite.lean | 0d68b17604a22a7ceeef2c9ddb37637169abcb74 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | thjread/mathlib | a9d97612cedc2c3101060737233df15abcdb9eb1 | 7cffe2520a5518bba19227a107078d83fa725ddc | refs/heads/master | 1,615,637,696,376 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 246,680,271 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,583,960,875,000 | 1,583,960,875,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,872 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
Finite sets.
-/
import logic.function
import data.nat.basic data.fintype data.set.lattice data.set.function
import algebra.big_operators
open set lattice function
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {γ : Type x}
namespace set
/-- A set is finite if the subtype is a fintype, i.e. there is a
list that enumerates its members. -/
def finite (s : set α) : Prop := nonempty (fintype s)
/-- A set is infinite if it is not finite. -/
def infinite (s : set α) : Prop := ¬ finite s
/-- The subtype corresponding to a finite set is a finite type. Note
that because `finite` isn't a typeclass, this will not fire if it
is made into an instance -/
noncomputable def finite.fintype {s : set α} (h : finite s) : fintype s :=
classical.choice h
/-- Get a finset from a finite set -/
noncomputable def finite.to_finset {s : set α} (h : finite s) : finset α :=
@set.to_finset _ _ (finite.fintype h)
@[simp] theorem finite.mem_to_finset {s : set α} {h : finite s} {a : α} : a ∈ h.to_finset ↔ a ∈ s :=
@mem_to_finset _ _ (finite.fintype h) _
lemma finite.coe_to_finset {α} {s : set α} (h : finite s) : ↑h.to_finset = s :=
by { ext, apply mem_to_finset }
theorem finite.exists_finset {s : set α} : finite s →
∃ s' : finset α, ∀ a : α, a ∈ s' ↔ a ∈ s
| ⟨h⟩ := by exactI ⟨to_finset s, λ _, mem_to_finset⟩
theorem finite.exists_finset_coe {s : set α} (hs : finite s) :
∃ s' : finset α, ↑s' = s :=
⟨hs.to_finset, hs.coe_to_finset⟩
/-- Finite sets can be lifted to finsets. -/
instance : can_lift (set α) (finset α) :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := finite,
prf := λ s hs, hs.exists_finset_coe }
theorem finite_mem_finset (s : finset α) : finite {a | a ∈ s} :=
⟨fintype.of_finset s (λ _, iff.rfl)⟩
theorem finite.of_fintype [fintype α] (s : set α) : finite s :=
by classical; exact ⟨set_fintype s⟩
/-- Membership of a subset of a finite type is decidable.
Using this as an instance leads to potential loops with `subtype.fintype` under certain decidability
assumptions, so it should only be declared a local instance. -/
def decidable_mem_of_fintype [decidable_eq α] (s : set α) [fintype s] (a) : decidable (a ∈ s) :=
decidable_of_iff _ mem_to_finset
instance fintype_empty : fintype (∅ : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset ∅ $ by simp
theorem empty_card : fintype.card (∅ : set α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_card' {h : fintype.{u} (∅ : set α)} :
@fintype.card (∅ : set α) h = 0 :=
eq.trans (by congr) empty_card
@[simp] theorem finite_empty : @finite α ∅ := ⟨set.fintype_empty⟩
def fintype_insert' {a : α} (s : set α) [fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) : fintype (insert a s : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset ⟨a :: s.to_finset.1,
multiset.nodup_cons_of_nodup (by simp [h]) s.to_finset.2⟩ $ by simp
theorem card_fintype_insert' {a : α} (s : set α) [fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) :
@fintype.card _ (fintype_insert' s h) = fintype.card s + 1 :=
by rw [fintype_insert', fintype.card_of_finset];
simp [finset.card, to_finset]; refl
@[simp] theorem card_insert {a : α} (s : set α)
[fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) {d : fintype.{u} (insert a s : set α)} :
@fintype.card _ d = fintype.card s + 1 :=
by rw ← card_fintype_insert' s h; congr
lemma card_image_of_inj_on {s : set α} [fintype s]
{f : α → β} [fintype (f '' s)] (H : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) :
fintype.card (f '' s) = fintype.card s :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact
calc fintype.card (f '' s) = (s.to_finset.image f).card : fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp)
... = s.to_finset.card : finset.card_image_of_inj_on
(λ x hx y hy hxy, H x (mem_to_finset.1 hx) y (mem_to_finset.1 hy) hxy)
... = fintype.card s : (fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ a, mem_to_finset)).symm
lemma card_image_of_injective (s : set α) [fintype s]
{f : α → β} [fintype (f '' s)] (H : function.injective f) :
fintype.card (f '' s) = fintype.card s :=
card_image_of_inj_on $ λ _ _ _ _ h, H h
section
local attribute [instance] decidable_mem_of_fintype
instance fintype_insert [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : set α) [fintype s] : fintype (insert a s : set α) :=
if h : a ∈ s then by rwa [insert_eq, union_eq_self_of_subset_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 h)]
else fintype_insert' _ h
end
@[simp] theorem finite_insert (a : α) {s : set α} : finite s → finite (insert a s)
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_insert _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ h⟩
lemma to_finset_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : finite s) :
(finite_insert a hs).to_finset = insert a hs.to_finset :=
finset.ext.mpr $ by simp
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem finite.induction_on {C : set α → Prop} {s : set α} (h : finite s)
(H0 : C ∅) (H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → finite s → C s → C (insert a s)) : C s :=
let ⟨t⟩ := h in by exactI
match s.to_finset, @mem_to_finset _ s _ with
| ⟨l, nd⟩, al := begin
change ∀ a, a ∈ l ↔ a ∈ s at al,
clear _let_match _match t h, revert s nd al,
refine multiset.induction_on l _ (λ a l IH, _); intros s nd al,
{ rw show s = ∅, from eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (by simpa using al),
exact H0 },
{ rw ← show insert a {x | x ∈ l} = s, from set.ext (by simpa using al),
cases multiset.nodup_cons.1 nd with m nd',
refine H1 _ ⟨finset.subtype.fintype ⟨l, nd'⟩⟩ (IH nd' (λ _, iff.rfl)),
exact m }
end
end
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem finite.dinduction_on {C : ∀s:set α, finite s → Prop} {s : set α} (h : finite s)
(H0 : C ∅ finite_empty)
(H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → ∀h:finite s, C s h → C (insert a s) (finite_insert a h)) :
C s h :=
have ∀h:finite s, C s h,
from finite.induction_on h (assume h, H0) (assume a s has hs ih h, H1 has hs (ih _)),
this h
instance fintype_singleton (a : α) : fintype ({a} : set α) :=
fintype_insert' _ (not_mem_empty _)
@[simp] theorem card_singleton (a : α) :
fintype.card ({a} : set α) = 1 :=
by rw [show fintype.card ({a} : set α) = _, from
card_fintype_insert' ∅ (not_mem_empty a)]; refl
@[simp] theorem finite_singleton (a : α) : finite ({a} : set α) :=
⟨set.fintype_singleton _⟩
instance fintype_pure : ∀ a : α, fintype (pure a : set α) :=
set.fintype_singleton
theorem finite_pure (a : α) : finite (pure a : set α) :=
⟨set.fintype_pure a⟩
instance fintype_univ [fintype α] : fintype (@univ α) :=
fintype.of_equiv α $ (equiv.set.univ α).symm
theorem finite_univ [fintype α] : finite (@univ α) := ⟨set.fintype_univ⟩
theorem infinite_univ_iff : (@univ α).infinite ↔ _root_.infinite α :=
⟨λ h₁, ⟨λ h₂, h₁ $ @finite_univ α h₂⟩,
λ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩, h₁ $ @fintype.of_equiv _ _ h₂ $ equiv.set.univ _⟩
theorem infinite_univ [h : _root_.infinite α] : infinite (@univ α) :=
infinite_univ_iff.2 h
instance fintype_union [decidable_eq α] (s t : set α) [fintype s] [fintype t] : fintype (s ∪ t : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset ∪ t.to_finset) $ by simp
theorem finite_union {s t : set α} : finite s → finite t → finite (s ∪ t)
| ⟨hs⟩ ⟨ht⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_union _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ hs ht⟩
instance fintype_sep (s : set α) (p : α → Prop) [fintype s] [decidable_pred p] : fintype ({a ∈ s | p a} : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.filter p) $ by simp
instance fintype_inter (s t : set α) [fintype s] [decidable_pred t] : fintype (s ∩ t : set α) :=
set.fintype_sep s t
def fintype_subset (s : set α) {t : set α} [fintype s] [decidable_pred t] (h : t ⊆ s) : fintype t :=
by rw ← inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h; apply_instance
theorem finite_subset {s : set α} : finite s → ∀ {t : set α}, t ⊆ s → finite t
| ⟨hs⟩ t h := ⟨@set.fintype_subset _ _ _ hs (classical.dec_pred t) h⟩
instance fintype_image [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) [fintype s] : fintype (f '' s) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.image f) $ by simp
instance fintype_range [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) [fintype α] : fintype (range f) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.univ.image f) $ by simp [range]
theorem finite_range (f : α → β) [fintype α] : finite (range f) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq β; exact ⟨by apply_instance⟩
theorem finite_image {s : set α} (f : α → β) : finite s → finite (f '' s)
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_image _ _ (classical.dec_eq β) _ _ h⟩
instance fintype_map {α β} [decidable_eq β] :
∀ (s : set α) (f : α → β) [fintype s], fintype (f <$> s) := set.fintype_image
theorem finite_map {α β} {s : set α} :
∀ (f : α → β), finite s → finite (f <$> s) := finite_image
def fintype_of_fintype_image (s : set α)
{f : α → β} {g} (I : is_partial_inv f g) [fintype (f '' s)] : fintype s :=
fintype.of_finset ⟨_, @multiset.nodup_filter_map β α g _
(@injective_of_partial_inv_right _ _ f g I) (f '' s).to_finset.2⟩ $ λ a,
begin
suffices : (∃ b x, f x = b ∧ g b = some a ∧ x ∈ s) ↔ a ∈ s,
by simpa [exists_and_distrib_left.symm, and.comm, and.left_comm, and.assoc],
rw exists_swap,
suffices : (∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ g (f x) = some a) ↔ a ∈ s, {simpa [and.comm, and.left_comm, and.assoc]},
simp [I _, (injective_of_partial_inv I).eq_iff]
end
theorem finite_of_finite_image_on {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : set.inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) → finite s | ⟨h⟩ :=
⟨@fintype.of_injective _ _ h (λa:s, ⟨f a.1, mem_image_of_mem f a.2⟩) $
assume a b eq, subtype.eq $ hi a.2 b.2 $ subtype.ext.1 eq⟩
theorem finite_image_iff_on {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) ↔ finite s :=
⟨finite_of_finite_image_on hi, finite_image _⟩
theorem finite_of_finite_image {s : set α} {f : α → β} (I : set.inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) → finite s :=
finite_of_finite_image_on I
theorem finite_preimage {s : set β} {f : α → β}
(I : set.inj_on f (f⁻¹' s)) (h : finite s) : finite (f ⁻¹' s) :=
finite_of_finite_image I (finite_subset h (image_preimage_subset f s))
instance fintype_Union [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} [fintype ι]
(f : ι → set α) [∀ i, fintype (f i)] : fintype (⋃ i, f i) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.univ.bind (λ i, (f i).to_finset)) $ by simp
theorem finite_Union {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {f : ι → set α} (H : ∀i, finite (f i)) : finite (⋃ i, f i) :=
⟨@set.fintype_Union _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ _ (λ i, finite.fintype (H i))⟩
def fintype_bUnion [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} [fintype s]
(f : ι → set α) (H : ∀ i ∈ s, fintype (f i)) : fintype (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
by rw bUnion_eq_Union; exact
@set.fintype_Union _ _ _ _ _ (by rintro ⟨i, hi⟩; exact H i hi)
instance fintype_bUnion' [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} [fintype s]
(f : ι → set α) [H : ∀ i, fintype (f i)] : fintype (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
fintype_bUnion _ (λ i _, H i)
theorem finite_sUnion {s : set (set α)} (h : finite s) (H : ∀t∈s, finite t) : finite (⋃₀ s) :=
by rw sUnion_eq_Union; haveI := finite.fintype h;
apply finite_Union; simpa using H
theorem finite_bUnion {α} {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} {f : ι → set α} :
finite s → (∀i, finite (f i)) → finite (⋃ i∈s, f i)
| ⟨hs⟩ h := by rw [bUnion_eq_Union]; exactI finite_Union (λ i, h _)
theorem finite_bUnion' {α} {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} (f : ι → set α) :
finite s → (∀i ∈ s, finite (f i)) → finite (⋃ i∈s, f i)
| ⟨hs⟩ h := by { rw [bUnion_eq_Union], exactI finite_Union (λ i, h i.1 i.2) }
instance fintype_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : fintype {i | i < n} :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.range n) $ by simp
instance fintype_le_nat (n : ℕ) : fintype {i | i ≤ n} :=
by simpa [nat.lt_succ_iff] using set.fintype_lt_nat (n+1)
lemma finite_le_nat (n : ℕ) : finite {i | i ≤ n} := ⟨set.fintype_le_nat _⟩
lemma finite_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : finite {i | i < n} := ⟨set.fintype_lt_nat _⟩
instance fintype_prod (s : set α) (t : set β) [fintype s] [fintype t] : fintype (set.prod s t) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.product t.to_finset) $ by simp
lemma finite_prod {s : set α} {t : set β} : finite s → finite t → finite (set.prod s t)
| ⟨hs⟩ ⟨ht⟩ := by exactI ⟨set.fintype_prod s t⟩
def fintype_bind {α β} [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) [fintype s]
(f : α → set β) (H : ∀ a ∈ s, fintype (f a)) : fintype (s >>= f) :=
set.fintype_bUnion _ H
instance fintype_bind' {α β} [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) [fintype s]
(f : α → set β) [H : ∀ a, fintype (f a)] : fintype (s >>= f) :=
fintype_bind _ _ (λ i _, H i)
theorem finite_bind {α β} {s : set α} {f : α → set β} :
finite s → (∀ a ∈ s, finite (f a)) → finite (s >>= f)
| ⟨hs⟩ H := ⟨@fintype_bind _ _ (classical.dec_eq β) _ hs _ (λ a ha, (H a ha).fintype)⟩
instance fintype_seq {α β : Type u} [decidable_eq β]
(f : set (α → β)) (s : set α) [fintype f] [fintype s] :
fintype (f <*> s) :=
by rw seq_eq_bind_map; apply set.fintype_bind'
theorem finite_seq {α β : Type u} {f : set (α → β)} {s : set α} :
finite f → finite s → finite (f <*> s)
| ⟨hf⟩ ⟨hs⟩ := by { haveI := classical.dec_eq β, exactI ⟨set.fintype_seq _ _⟩ }
/-- There are finitely many subsets of a given finite set -/
lemma finite_subsets_of_finite {α : Type u} {a : set α} (h : finite a) : finite {b | b ⊆ a} :=
begin
-- we just need to translate the result, already known for finsets,
-- to the language of finite sets
let s := coe '' ((finset.powerset (finite.to_finset h)).to_set),
have : finite s := finite_image _ (finite_mem_finset _),
have : {b | b ⊆ a} ⊆ s :=
begin
assume b hb,
rw [set.mem_image],
rw [set.mem_set_of_eq] at hb,
let b' : finset α := finite.to_finset (finite_subset h hb),
have : b' ∈ (finset.powerset (finite.to_finset h)).to_set :=
show b' ∈ (finset.powerset (finite.to_finset h)),
by simp [b', finset.subset_iff]; exact hb,
have : coe b' = b := by ext; simp,
exact ⟨b', by assumption, by assumption⟩
end,
exact finite_subset ‹finite s› this
end
lemma exists_min [decidable_linear_order β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) (h1 : finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, f a ≤ f b
| ⟨x, hx⟩ := by simpa only [exists_prop, finite.mem_to_finset]
using (finite.to_finset h1).exists_min f ⟨x, finite.mem_to_finset.2 hx⟩
end set
namespace finset
variables [decidable_eq β]
variables {s t u : finset α} {f : α → β} {a : α}
lemma finite_to_set (s : finset α) : set.finite (↑s : set α) :=
set.finite_mem_finset s
@[simp] lemma coe_bind {f : α → finset β} : ↑(s.bind f) = (⋃x ∈ (↑s : set α), ↑(f x) : set β) :=
by simp [set.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma coe_to_finset {s : set α} {hs : set.finite s} : ↑(hs.to_finset) = s :=
by simp [set.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma coe_to_finset' (s : set α) [fintype s] : (↑s.to_finset : set α) = s :=
by ext; simp
end finset
namespace set
lemma finite_subset_Union {s : set α} (hs : finite s)
{ι} {t : ι → set α} (h : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i) : ∃ I : set ι, finite I ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i :=
begin
unfreezeI, cases hs,
choose f hf using show ∀ x : s, ∃ i, x.1 ∈ t i, {simpa [subset_def] using h},
refine ⟨range f, finite_range f, _⟩,
rintro x hx,
simp,
exact ⟨x, ⟨hx, hf _⟩⟩,
end
lemma finite_range_ite {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {f g : α → β} (hf : finite (range f))
(hg : finite (range g)) : finite (range (λ x, if p x then f x else g x)) :=
finite_subset (finite_union hf hg) range_ite_subset
lemma finite_range_const {c : β} : finite (range (λ x : α, c)) :=
finite_subset (finite_singleton c) range_const_subset
lemma range_find_greatest_subset {P : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (P x)] {b : ℕ}:
range (λ x, nat.find_greatest (P x) b) ⊆ ↑(finset.range (b + 1)) :=
by { rw range_subset_iff, assume x, simp [nat.lt_succ_iff, nat.find_greatest_le] }
lemma finite_range_find_greatest {P : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (P x)] {b : ℕ} :
finite (range (λ x, nat.find_greatest (P x) b)) :=
finite_subset (finset.finite_to_set $ finset.range (b + 1)) range_find_greatest_subset
lemma card_lt_card {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t] (h : s ⊂ t) :
fintype.card s < fintype.card t :=
begin
haveI := classical.prop_decidable,
rw [← finset.coe_to_finset' s, ← finset.coe_to_finset' t, finset.coe_ssubset] at h,
rw [fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ x, mem_to_finset),
fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ x, mem_to_finset)],
exact finset.card_lt_card h,
end
lemma card_le_of_subset {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t] (hsub : s ⊆ t) :
fintype.card s ≤ fintype.card t :=
calc fintype.card s = s.to_finset.card : fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp)
... ≤ t.to_finset.card : finset.card_le_of_subset (λ x hx, by simp [set.subset_def, *] at *)
... = fintype.card t : eq.symm (fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp))
lemma eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t]
(hsub : s ⊆ t) (hcard : fintype.card t ≤ fintype.card s) : s = t :=
(eq_or_ssubset_of_subset hsub).elim id
(λ h, absurd hcard $ not_le_of_lt $ card_lt_card h)
lemma card_range_of_injective [fintype α] {f : α → β} (hf : injective f)
[fintype (range f)] : fintype.card (range f) = fintype.card α :=
eq.symm $ fintype.card_congr (@equiv.of_bijective _ _ (λ a : α, show range f, from ⟨f a, a, rfl⟩)
⟨λ x y h, hf $ subtype.mk.inj h, λ b, let ⟨a, ha⟩ := b.2 in ⟨a, by simp *⟩⟩)
lemma finite.exists_maximal_wrt [partial_order β] (f : α → β) (s : set α) (h : set.finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃a∈s, ∀a'∈s, f a ≤ f a' → f a = f a' :=
begin
classical,
refine h.induction_on _ _,
{ assume h, exact absurd h empty_not_nonempty },
assume a s his _ ih _,
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ use a, simp [h] },
rcases ih h with ⟨b, hb, ih⟩,
by_cases f b ≤ f a,
{ refine ⟨a, set.mem_insert _ _, assume c hc hac, le_antisymm hac _⟩,
rcases set.mem_insert_iff.1 hc with rfl | hcs,
{ refl },
{ rwa [← ih c hcs (le_trans h hac)] } },
{ refine ⟨b, set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hb, assume c hc hbc, _⟩,
rcases set.mem_insert_iff.1 hc with rfl | hcs,
{ exact (h hbc).elim },
{ exact ih c hcs hbc } }
end
section
local attribute [instance, priority 1] classical.prop_decidable
lemma to_finset_card {α : Type*} [fintype α] (H : set α) :
H.to_finset.card = fintype.card H :=
multiset.card_map subtype.val finset.univ.val
lemma to_finset_inter {α : Type*} [fintype α] (s t : set α) [decidable_eq α] :
(s ∩ t).to_finset = s.to_finset ∩ t.to_finset :=
by ext; simp
end
section
variables [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] {s : set α}
/--A finite set is bounded above.-/
lemma bdd_above_finite (hs : finite s) : bdd_above s :=
finite.induction_on hs bdd_above_empty $ λ a s _ _ h, h.insert a
/--A finite union of sets which are all bounded above is still bounded above.-/
lemma bdd_above_finite_union {I : set β} {S : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
(bdd_above (⋃i∈I, S i)) ↔ (∀i ∈ I, bdd_above (S i)) :=
finite.induction_on H
(by simp only [bUnion_empty, bdd_above_empty, ball_empty_iff])
(λ a s ha _ hs, by simp only [bUnion_insert, ball_insert_iff, bdd_above_union, hs])
end
section
variables [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] {s : set α}
/--A finite set is bounded below.-/
lemma bdd_below_finite (hs : finite s) : bdd_below s :=
finite.induction_on hs bdd_below_empty $ λ a s _ _ h, h.insert a
/--A finite union of sets which are all bounded below is still bounded below.-/
lemma bdd_below_finite_union {I : set β} {S : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
(bdd_below (⋃i∈I, S i)) ↔ (∀i ∈ I, bdd_below (S i)) :=
@bdd_above_finite_union (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ H
end
end set
namespace finset
section preimage
noncomputable def preimage {f : α → β} (s : finset β)
(hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)) : finset α :=
set.finite.to_finset (set.finite_preimage hf (set.finite_mem_finset s))
@[simp] lemma mem_preimage {f : α → β} {s : finset β} {hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)} {x : α} :
x ∈ preimage s hf ↔ f x ∈ s :=
by simp [preimage]
@[simp] lemma coe_preimage {f : α → β} (s : finset β)
(hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)) : (↑(preimage s hf) : set α) = f ⁻¹' ↑s :=
by simp [set.ext_iff]
lemma image_preimage [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) (s : finset β)
(hf : set.bij_on f (f ⁻¹' s.to_set) s.to_set) :
image f (preimage s hf.inj_on) = s :=
finset.coe_inj.1 $
suffices f '' (f ⁻¹' ↑s) = ↑s, by simpa,
(set.subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset _ _) hf.2.2)
end preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage [comm_monoid β] (f : α → γ) (s : finset γ)
(hf : set.bij_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s) ↑s) (g : γ → β) :
(preimage s hf.inj_on).prod (g ∘ f) = s.prod g :=
by classical;
calc
(preimage s hf.inj_on).prod (g ∘ f)
= (image f (preimage s hf.inj_on)).prod g :
begin
rw prod_image,
intros x hx y hy hxy,
apply hf.inj_on,
repeat { try { rw mem_preimage at hx hy,
rw [set.mem_preimage, mem_coe] },
assumption },
end
... = s.prod g : by rw [image_preimage]
end finset
lemma fintype.exists_max [fintype α] [nonempty α]
{β : Type*} [linear_order β] (f : α → β) :
∃ x₀ : α, ∀ x, f x ≤ f x₀ :=
begin
rcases set.finite_univ.exists_maximal_wrt f _ univ_nonempty with ⟨x, _, hx⟩,
exact ⟨x, λ y, (le_total (f x) (f y)).elim (λ h, ge_of_eq $ hx _ trivial h) id⟩
end
|
5d879d5f64a61f4cb3f04bc1d39cab747da95ec2 | 86f6f4f8d827a196a32bfc646234b73328aeb306 | /examples/basics/unnamed_920.lean | 81ef9e7e2b6462239d5fa5910dca92aac4ea133d | [] | no_license | jamescheuk91/mathematics_in_lean | 09f1f87d2b0dce53464ff0cbe592c568ff59cf5e | 4452499264e2975bca2f42565c0925506ba5dda3 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,716,410,967 | 1,613,957,947,000 | 1,613,957,947,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 220 | lean | import algebra.group
-- BEGIN
variables (G : Type*) [group G]
#check (mul_assoc : ∀ a b c : G, a * b * c = a * (b * c))
#check (one_mul : ∀ a : G, 1 * a = a)
#check (mul_left_inv : ∀ a : G, a⁻¹ * a = 1)
-- END |
8e4c0f03d068b63d8060165ccf1fd4ccb50b4f12 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /stage0/src/Init/Lean/Parser/Command.lean | 3b7609c447e2aa0fda8b0ee5cf5fa60e35356df9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,410 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import Init.Lean.Parser.Term
namespace Lean
namespace Parser
@[init] def regBuiltinCommandParserAttr : IO Unit :=
registerBuiltinParserAttribute `builtinCommandParser `command
@[init] def regCommandParserAttribute : IO Unit :=
registerBuiltinDynamicParserAttribute `commandParser `command
@[inline] def commandParser (rbp : Nat := 0) : Parser :=
categoryParser `command rbp
/--
Syntax quotation for terms and (lists of) commands. We prefer terms, so ambiguous quotations like
`($x $y) will be parsed as an application, not two commands. Use `($x:command $y:command) instead.
Multiple command will be put in a `null node, but a single command will not (so that you can directly
match against a quotation in a command kind's elaborator). -/
@[builtinTermParser] def Term.stxQuot := parser! symbol "`(" appPrec >> (termParser <|> many1 commandParser true) >> ")"
namespace Command
def commentBody : Parser :=
{ fn := rawFn (finishCommentBlock 1) true }
def docComment := parser! "/--" >> commentBody
def attrArg : Parser := ident <|> strLit <|> numLit
-- use `rawIdent` because of attribute names such as `instance`
def attrInstance := parser! rawIdent >> many attrArg
def attributes := parser! "@[" >> sepBy1 attrInstance ", " >> "]"
def «private» := parser! "private "
def «protected» := parser! "protected "
def visibility := «private» <|> «protected»
def «noncomputable» := parser! "noncomputable "
def «unsafe» := parser! "unsafe "
def «partial» := parser! "partial "
def declModifiers := parser! optional docComment >> optional «attributes» >> optional visibility >> optional «noncomputable» >> optional «unsafe» >> optional «partial»
def declId := parser! ident >> optional (".{" >> sepBy1 ident ", " >> "}")
def declSig := parser! many Term.bracktedBinder >> Term.typeSpec
def optDeclSig := parser! many Term.bracktedBinder >> Term.optType
def declValSimple := parser! " := " >> termParser
def declValEqns := parser! Term.matchAlts false
def declVal := declValSimple <|> declValEqns
def «abbrev» := parser! "abbrev " >> declId >> optDeclSig >> declVal
def «def» := parser! "def " >> declId >> optDeclSig >> declVal
def «theorem» := parser! "theorem " >> declId >> declSig >> declVal
def «constant» := parser! "constant " >> declId >> declSig >> optional declValSimple
def «instance» := parser! "instance " >> optional declId >> declSig >> declVal
def «axiom» := parser! "axiom " >> declId >> declSig
def «example» := parser! "example " >> declSig >> declVal
def relaxedInferMod := parser! try ("{" >> "}")
def strictInferMod := parser! try ("(" >> ")")
def inferMod := relaxedInferMod <|> strictInferMod
def introRule := parser! " | " >> ident >> optional inferMod >> optDeclSig
def «inductive» := parser! "inductive " >> declId >> optDeclSig >> many introRule
def classInductive := parser! try ("class " >> "inductive ") >> declId >> optDeclSig >> many introRule
def structExplicitBinder := parser! "(" >> many ident >> optional inferMod >> optDeclSig >> optional Term.binderDefault >> ")"
def structImplicitBinder := parser! "{" >> many ident >> optional inferMod >> optDeclSig >> "}"
def structInstBinder := parser! "[" >> many ident >> optional inferMod >> optDeclSig >> "]"
def structFields := parser! many (structExplicitBinder <|> structImplicitBinder <|> structInstBinder)
def structCtor := parser! ident >> optional inferMod >> " :: "
def structureTk := parser! "structure "
def classTk := parser! "class "
def «extends» := parser! " extends " >> sepBy1 termParser ", "
def «structure» := parser! (structureTk <|> classTk) >> declId >> many Term.bracktedBinder >> optional «extends» >> Term.optType >> " := " >> optional structCtor >> structFields
@[builtinCommandParser] def declaration := parser!
declModifiers >> («abbrev» <|> «def» <|> «theorem» <|> «constant» <|> «instance» <|> «axiom» <|> «example» <|> «inductive» <|> classInductive <|> «structure»)
@[builtinCommandParser] def «section» := parser! "section " >> optional ident
@[builtinCommandParser] def «namespace» := parser! "namespace " >> ident
@[builtinCommandParser] def «end» := parser! "end " >> optional ident
@[builtinCommandParser] def «variable» := parser! "variable " >> Term.bracktedBinder
@[builtinCommandParser] def «variables» := parser! "variables " >> many1 Term.bracktedBinder
@[builtinCommandParser] def «universe» := parser! "universe " >> ident
@[builtinCommandParser] def «universes» := parser! "universes " >> many1 ident
@[builtinCommandParser] def check := parser! "#check " >> termParser
@[builtinCommandParser] def check_failure := parser! "#check_failure " >> termParser -- Like `#check`, but succeeds only if term does not type check
@[builtinCommandParser] def synth := parser! "#synth " >> termParser
@[builtinCommandParser] def exit := parser! "#exit"
@[builtinCommandParser] def «resolve_name» := parser! "#resolve_name " >> ident
@[builtinCommandParser] def «init_quot» := parser! "init_quot"
@[builtinCommandParser] def «set_option» := parser! "set_option " >> ident >> (nonReservedSymbol "true" <|> nonReservedSymbol "false" <|> strLit <|> numLit)
@[builtinCommandParser] def «attribute» := parser! optional "local " >> "attribute " >> "[" >> sepBy1 attrInstance ", " >> "]" >> many1 ident
@[builtinCommandParser] def «export» := parser! "export " >> ident >> "(" >> many1 ident >> ")"
def openHiding := parser! try (ident >> "hiding") >> many1 ident
def openRenamingItem := parser! ident >> unicodeSymbol "→" "->" >> ident
def openRenaming := parser! try (ident >> "renaming") >> sepBy1 openRenamingItem ", "
def openOnly := parser! try (ident >> "(") >> many1 ident >> ")"
def openSimple := parser! many1 ident
@[builtinCommandParser] def «open» := parser! "open " >> (openHiding <|> openRenaming <|> openOnly <|> openSimple)
end Command
end Parser
end Lean
|
e96523e69ef8a044e50d7b49f813ad0eb19e10c6 | abbfc359cee49d3c5258b2bbedc2b4d306ec3bdf | /src/category/serial.lean | f5ef28ee97303e2cfe2c76a461b7c1f8694a57cc | [] | no_license | cipher1024/serialean | 565b17241ba7edc4ee564bf0ae175dd15b06a28c | 47881e4a6bc0a62cd68520564610b75f8a4fef2c | refs/heads/master | 1,585,117,575,599 | 1,535,783,976,000 | 1,535,783,976,000 | 143,501,396 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,347 | lean |
import tactic
universes u v
namespace monad
@[simp]
lemma bind_pure_star {m} [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m] (x : m punit) :
x >>= (λ (_x : punit), pure punit.star : punit → m punit) = x :=
by { transitivity,
{ apply congr_arg, ext z, cases z, refl },
{ simp } }
variables {α β γ : Type u}
variables {m : Type u → Type v} [monad m]
@[reducible]
def pipe (a : α → m β) (b : β → m γ) : α → m γ :=
λ x, a x >>= b
infixr ` >=> `:55 := pipe
@[functor_norm]
lemma map_bind_eq_bind_comp {α β γ} {m} [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m]
(f : α → β) (cmd : m α) (g : β → m γ) :
(f <$> cmd) >>= g = cmd >>= g ∘ f :=
by rw [← bind_pure_comp_eq_map,bind_assoc,(∘)]; simp
@[functor_norm]
lemma bind_map {α β γ} {m} [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m]
(f : α → γ → β) (cmd : m α) (g : α → m γ) :
cmd >>= (λ x, f x <$> g x) = do { x ← cmd, y ← g x, pure $ f x y } :=
by congr; ext; rw [← bind_pure (g x),map_bind]; simp
@[functor_norm]
lemma bind_seq {α β γ : Type u} {m} [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m]
(f : α → m (γ → β)) (cmd : m α) (g : α → m γ) :
cmd >>= (λ x, f x <*> g x) = do { x ← cmd, h ← f x, y ← g x, pure $ h y } :=
by congr; ext; simp [seq_eq_bind_map] with functor_norm
end monad
attribute [functor_norm] bind_assoc has_bind.and_then map_bind
|
8b80a8153f608f5121be13d84a23d1e15d8e8136 | 13133fade54057ee588bc056e4eaa14a24773d23 | /Definitions/factorial_def.lean | 4986fe9db3e8fe5ebc72fc9039a3717fc6d0db07 | [] | no_license | lkloh/lean-project-15815 | 444cbdca1d1a2dfa258c76c41a6ff846392e13d1 | 2cb657c0e41baa318193f7dce85974ff37d80883 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,402,038,933 | 1,432,020,760,000 | 1,432,020,760,000 | 33,372,120 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,431,932,928,000 | 1,428,078,840,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 138 | lean | import data.nat
open nat
definition fac : nat → nat
| fac 0 := 1
| fac 1 := 1
| fac (n+2) := fac (n+1) * (n+2)
check fac 3 = 6 |
fa7f08463658cb5059e0579440cc2841538af621 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/category_theory/bicategory/functor.lean | 6d5e10ff3110eda3fe39a9fabe741f5a67b5d38d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,403 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yuma Mizuno. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yuma Mizuno
-/
import category_theory.bicategory.basic
/-!
# Oplax functors and pseudofunctors
An oplax functor `F` between bicategories `B` and `C` consists of
* a function between objects `F.obj : B ⟶ C`,
* a family of functions between 1-morphisms `F.map : (a ⟶ b) → (F.obj a ⟶ F.obj b)`,
* a family of functions between 2-morphisms `F.map₂ : (f ⟶ g) → (F.map f ⟶ F.map g)`,
* a family of 2-morphisms `F.map_id a : F.map (𝟙 a) ⟶ 𝟙 (F.obj a)`,
* a family of 2-morphisms `F.map_comp f g : F.map (f ≫ g) ⟶ F.map f ≫ F.map g`, and
* certain consistency conditions on them.
A pseudofunctor is an oplax functor whose `map_id` and `map_comp` are isomorphisms. We provide
several constructors for pseudofunctors:
* `pseudofunctor.mk` : the default constructor, which requires `map₂_whisker_left` and
`map₂_whisker_right` instead of naturality of `map_comp`.
* `pseudofunctor.mk_of_oplax` : construct a pseudofunctor from an oplax functor whose
`map_id` and `map_comp` are isomorphisms. This constructor uses `iso` to describe isomorphisms.
* `pseudofunctor.mk_of_oplax'` : similar to `mk_of_oplax`, but uses `is_iso` to describe
isomorphisms.
The additional constructors are useful when constructing a pseudofunctor where the construction
of the oplax functor associated with it is already done. For example, the composition of
pseudofunctors can be defined by using the composition of oplax functors as follows:
```lean
def pseudofunctor.comp (F : pseudofunctor B C) (G : pseudofunctor C D) : pseudofunctor B D :=
mk_of_oplax ((F : oplax_functor B C).comp G)
{ map_id_iso := λ a, (G.map_functor _ _).map_iso (F.map_id a) ≪≫ G.map_id (F.obj a),
map_comp_iso := λ a b c f g,
(G.map_functor _ _).map_iso (F.map_comp f g) ≪≫ G.map_comp (F.map f) (F.map g) }
```
although the composition of pseudofunctors in this file is defined by using the default constructor
because `obviously` is smart enough. Similarly, the composition is also defined by using
`mk_of_oplax'` after giving appropriate instances for `is_iso`. The former constructor
`mk_of_oplax` requires isomorphisms as data type `iso`, and so it is useful if you don't want
to forget the definitions of the inverses. On the other hand, the latter constructor
`mk_of_oplax'` is useful if you want to use propositional type class `is_iso`.
## Main definitions
* `category_theory.oplax_functor B C` : an oplax functor between bicategories `B` and `C`
* `category_theory.oplax_functor.comp F G` : the composition of oplax functors
* `category_theory.pseudofunctor B C` : a pseudofunctor between bicategories `B` and `C`
* `category_theory.pseudofunctor.comp F G` : the composition of pseudofunctors
## Future work
There are two types of functors between bicategories, called lax and oplax functors, depending on
the directions of `map_id` and `map_comp`. We may need both in mathlib in the future, but for
now we only define oplax functors.
-/
set_option old_structure_cmd true
namespace category_theory
open category bicategory
open_locale bicategory
universes w₁ w₂ w₃ v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
section
variables {B : Type u₁} [quiver.{v₁+1} B] [∀ a b : B, quiver.{w₁+1} (a ⟶ b)]
variables {C : Type u₂} [quiver.{v₂+1} C] [∀ a b : C, quiver.{w₂+1} (a ⟶ b)]
variables {D : Type u₃} [quiver.{v₃+1} D] [∀ a b : D, quiver.{w₃+1} (a ⟶ b)]
/--
A prelax functor between bicategories consists of functions between objects,
1-morphisms, and 2-morphisms. This structure will be extended to define `oplax_functor`.
-/
structure prelax_functor
(B : Type u₁) [quiver.{v₁+1} B] [∀ a b : B, quiver.{w₁+1} (a ⟶ b)]
(C : Type u₂) [quiver.{v₂+1} C] [∀ a b : C, quiver.{w₂+1} (a ⟶ b)] extends prefunctor B C :=
(map₂ {a b : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} : (f ⟶ g) → (map f ⟶ map g))
/-- The prefunctor between the underlying quivers. -/
add_decl_doc prelax_functor.to_prefunctor
namespace prelax_functor
instance has_coe_to_prefunctor : has_coe (prelax_functor B C) (prefunctor B C) := ⟨to_prefunctor⟩
variables (F : prelax_functor B C)
@[simp] lemma to_prefunctor_eq_coe : F.to_prefunctor = F := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_prefunctor_obj : (F : prefunctor B C).obj = F.obj := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_prefunctor_map : @prefunctor.map B _ C _ F = @map _ _ _ _ _ _ F := rfl
/-- The identity prelax functor. -/
@[simps]
def id (B : Type u₁) [quiver.{v₁+1} B] [∀ a b : B, quiver.{w₁+1} (a ⟶ b)] : prelax_functor B B :=
{ map₂ := λ a b f g η, η, .. prefunctor.id B }
instance : inhabited (prelax_functor B B) := ⟨prelax_functor.id B⟩
/-- Composition of prelax functors. -/
@[simps]
def comp (F : prelax_functor B C) (G : prelax_functor C D) : prelax_functor B D :=
{ map₂ := λ a b f g η, G.map₂ (F.map₂ η), .. (F : prefunctor B C).comp ↑G }
end prelax_functor
end
section
variables {B : Type u₁} [bicategory.{w₁ v₁} B] {C : Type u₂} [bicategory.{w₂ v₂} C]
variables {D : Type u₃} [bicategory.{w₃ v₃} D]
/--
This auxiliary definition states that oplax functors preserve the associators
modulo some adjustments of domains and codomains of 2-morphisms.
-/
/-
We use this auxiliary definition instead of writing it directly in the definition
of oplax functors because doing so will cause a timeout.
-/
@[simp]
def oplax_functor.map₂_associator_aux
(obj : B → C) (map : Π {X Y : B}, (X ⟶ Y) → (obj X ⟶ obj Y))
(map₂ : Π {a b : B} {f g : a ⟶ b}, (f ⟶ g) → (map f ⟶ map g))
(map_comp : Π {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), map (f ≫ g) ⟶ map f ≫ map g)
{a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : Prop :=
map₂ (α_ f g h).hom ≫ map_comp f (g ≫ h) ≫ map f ◁ map_comp g h =
map_comp (f ≫ g) h ≫ map_comp f g ▷ map h ≫ (α_ (map f) (map g) (map h)).hom
/--
An oplax functor `F` between bicategories `B` and `C` consists of a function between objects
`F.obj`, a function between 1-morphisms `F.map`, and a function between 2-morphisms `F.map₂`.
Unlike functors between categories, `F.map` do not need to strictly commute with the composition,
and do not need to strictly preserve the identity. Instead, there are specified 2-morphisms
`F.map (𝟙 a) ⟶ 𝟙 (F.obj a)` and `F.map (f ≫ g) ⟶ F.map f ≫ F.map g`.
`F.map₂` strictly commute with compositions and preserve the identity. They also preserve the
associator, the left unitor, and the right unitor modulo some adjustments of domains and codomains
of 2-morphisms.
-/
structure oplax_functor (B : Type u₁) [bicategory.{w₁ v₁} B] (C : Type u₂) [bicategory.{w₂ v₂} C]
extends prelax_functor B C :=
(map_id (a : B) : map (𝟙 a) ⟶ 𝟙 (obj a))
(map_comp {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) : map (f ≫ g) ⟶ map f ≫ map g)
(map_comp_naturality_left' : ∀ {a b c : B} {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c),
map₂ (η ▷ g) ≫ map_comp f' g = map_comp f g ≫ map₂ η ▷ map g . obviously)
(map_comp_naturality_right' : ∀ {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g'),
map₂ (f ◁ η) ≫ map_comp f g' = map_comp f g ≫ map f ◁ map₂ η . obviously)
(map₂_id' : ∀ {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b), map₂ (𝟙 f) = 𝟙 (map f) . obviously)
(map₂_comp' : ∀ {a b : B} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h),
map₂ (η ≫ θ) = map₂ η ≫ map₂ θ . obviously)
(map₂_associator' : ∀ {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
oplax_functor.map₂_associator_aux obj (λ _ _, map) (λ a b f g, map₂) (λ a b c, map_comp) f g h
. obviously)
(map₂_left_unitor' : ∀ {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b),
map₂ (λ_ f).hom = map_comp (𝟙 a) f ≫ map_id a ▷ map f ≫ (λ_ (map f)).hom . obviously)
(map₂_right_unitor' : ∀ {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b),
map₂ (ρ_ f).hom = map_comp f (𝟙 b) ≫ map f ◁ map_id b ≫ (ρ_ (map f)).hom . obviously)
namespace oplax_functor
restate_axiom map_comp_naturality_left'
restate_axiom map_comp_naturality_right'
restate_axiom map₂_id'
restate_axiom map₂_comp'
restate_axiom map₂_associator'
restate_axiom map₂_left_unitor'
restate_axiom map₂_right_unitor'
attribute [simp] map_comp_naturality_left map_comp_naturality_right map₂_id map₂_associator
attribute [reassoc]
map_comp_naturality_left map_comp_naturality_right map₂_comp
map₂_associator map₂_left_unitor map₂_right_unitor
attribute [simp] map₂_comp map₂_left_unitor map₂_right_unitor
section
/-- The prelax functor between the underlying quivers. -/
add_decl_doc oplax_functor.to_prelax_functor
instance has_coe_to_prelax : has_coe (oplax_functor B C) (prelax_functor B C) :=
⟨to_prelax_functor⟩
variables (F : oplax_functor B C)
@[simp] lemma to_prelax_eq_coe : F.to_prelax_functor = F := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_prelax_functor_obj : (F : prelax_functor B C).obj = F.obj := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_prelax_functor_map : @prelax_functor.map B _ _ C _ _ F = @map _ _ _ _ F := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_prelax_functor_map₂ : @prelax_functor.map₂ B _ _ C _ _ F = @map₂ _ _ _ _ F := rfl
/-- Function between 1-morphisms as a functor. -/
@[simps]
def map_functor (a b : B) : (a ⟶ b) ⥤ (F.obj a ⟶ F.obj b) :=
{ obj := λ f, F.map f,
map := λ f g η, F.map₂ η }
/-- The identity oplax functor. -/
@[simps]
def id (B : Type u₁) [bicategory.{w₁ v₁} B] : oplax_functor B B :=
{ map_id := λ a, 𝟙 (𝟙 a),
map_comp := λ a b c f g, 𝟙 (f ≫ g),
.. prelax_functor.id B }
instance : inhabited (oplax_functor B B) := ⟨id B⟩
/-- Composition of oplax functors. -/
@[simps]
def comp (F : oplax_functor B C) (G : oplax_functor C D) : oplax_functor B D :=
{ map_id := λ a,
(G.map_functor _ _).map (F.map_id a) ≫ G.map_id (F.obj a),
map_comp := λ a b c f g,
(G.map_functor _ _).map (F.map_comp f g) ≫ G.map_comp (F.map f) (F.map g),
map_comp_naturality_left' := λ a b c f f' η g, by
{ dsimp,
rw [←map₂_comp_assoc, map_comp_naturality_left, map₂_comp_assoc, map_comp_naturality_left,
assoc] },
map_comp_naturality_right' := λ a b c f g g' η, by
{ dsimp,
rw [←map₂_comp_assoc, map_comp_naturality_right, map₂_comp_assoc, map_comp_naturality_right,
assoc] },
map₂_associator' := λ a b c d f g h, by
{ dsimp,
simp only [map₂_associator, ←map₂_comp_assoc, ←map_comp_naturality_right_assoc,
whisker_left_comp, assoc],
simp only [map₂_associator, map₂_comp, map_comp_naturality_left_assoc,
comp_whisker_right, assoc] },
map₂_left_unitor' := λ a b f, by
{ dsimp,
simp only [map₂_left_unitor, map₂_comp, map_comp_naturality_left_assoc,
comp_whisker_right, assoc] },
map₂_right_unitor' := λ a b f, by
{ dsimp,
simp only [map₂_right_unitor, map₂_comp, map_comp_naturality_right_assoc,
whisker_left_comp, assoc] },
.. (F : prelax_functor B C).comp ↑G }
/--
A structure on an oplax functor that promotes an oplax functor to a pseudofunctor.
See `pseudofunctor.mk_of_oplax`.
-/
@[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure pseudo_core (F : oplax_functor B C) :=
(map_id_iso (a : B) : F.map (𝟙 a) ≅ 𝟙 (F.obj a))
(map_comp_iso {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) : F.map (f ≫ g) ≅ F.map f ≫ F.map g)
(map_id_iso_hom' : ∀ {a : B}, (map_id_iso a).hom = F.map_id a . obviously)
(map_comp_iso_hom' : ∀ {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
(map_comp_iso f g).hom = F.map_comp f g . obviously)
restate_axiom pseudo_core.map_id_iso_hom'
restate_axiom pseudo_core.map_comp_iso_hom'
attribute [simp] pseudo_core.map_id_iso_hom pseudo_core.map_comp_iso_hom
end
end oplax_functor
/--
This auxiliary definition states that pseudofunctors preserve the associators
modulo some adjustments of domains and codomains of 2-morphisms.
-/
/-
We use this auxiliary definition instead of writing it directly in the definition
of pseudofunctors because doing so will cause a timeout.
-/
@[simp]
def pseudofunctor.map₂_associator_aux
(obj : B → C) (map : Π {X Y : B}, (X ⟶ Y) → (obj X ⟶ obj Y))
(map₂ : Π {a b : B} {f g : a ⟶ b}, (f ⟶ g) → (map f ⟶ map g))
(map_comp : Π {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), map (f ≫ g) ≅ map f ≫ map g)
{a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : Prop :=
map₂ (α_ f g h).hom = (map_comp (f ≫ g) h).hom ≫ (map_comp f g).hom ▷ map h ≫
(α_ (map f) (map g) (map h)).hom ≫ map f ◁ (map_comp g h).inv ≫ (map_comp f (g ≫ h)).inv
/--
A pseudofunctor `F` between bicategories `B` and `C` consists of a function between objects
`F.obj`, a function between 1-morphisms `F.map`, and a function between 2-morphisms `F.map₂`.
Unlike functors between categories, `F.map` do not need to strictly commute with the compositions,
and do not need to strictly preserve the identity. Instead, there are specified 2-isomorphisms
`F.map (𝟙 a) ≅ 𝟙 (F.obj a)` and `F.map (f ≫ g) ≅ F.map f ≫ F.map g`.
`F.map₂` strictly commute with compositions and preserve the identity. They also preserve the
associator, the left unitor, and the right unitor modulo some adjustments of domains and codomains
of 2-morphisms.
-/
structure pseudofunctor (B : Type u₁) [bicategory.{w₁ v₁} B] (C : Type u₂) [bicategory.{w₂ v₂} C]
extends prelax_functor B C :=
(map_id (a : B) : map (𝟙 a) ≅ 𝟙 (obj a))
(map_comp {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) : map (f ≫ g) ≅ map f ≫ map g)
(map₂_id' : ∀ {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b), map₂ (𝟙 f) = 𝟙 (map f) . obviously)
(map₂_comp' : ∀ {a b : B} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h),
map₂ (η ≫ θ) = map₂ η ≫ map₂ θ . obviously)
(map₂_whisker_left' : ∀ {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h),
map₂ (f ◁ η) = (map_comp f g).hom ≫ map f ◁ map₂ η ≫ (map_comp f h).inv . obviously)
(map₂_whisker_right' : ∀ {a b c : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c),
map₂ (η ▷ h) = (map_comp f h).hom ≫ map₂ η ▷ map h ≫ (map_comp g h).inv . obviously)
(map₂_associator' : ∀ {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
pseudofunctor.map₂_associator_aux obj (λ a b, map) (λ a b f g, map₂) (λ a b c, map_comp) f g h
. obviously)
(map₂_left_unitor' : ∀ {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b),
map₂ (λ_ f).hom = (map_comp (𝟙 a) f).hom ≫ (map_id a).hom ▷ map f ≫ (λ_ (map f)).hom
. obviously)
(map₂_right_unitor' : ∀ {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b),
map₂ (ρ_ f).hom = (map_comp f (𝟙 b)).hom ≫ map f ◁ (map_id b).hom ≫ (ρ_ (map f)).hom
. obviously)
namespace pseudofunctor
restate_axiom map₂_id'
restate_axiom map₂_comp'
restate_axiom map₂_whisker_left'
restate_axiom map₂_whisker_right'
restate_axiom map₂_associator'
restate_axiom map₂_left_unitor'
restate_axiom map₂_right_unitor'
attribute [reassoc]
map₂_comp map₂_whisker_left map₂_whisker_right map₂_associator map₂_left_unitor map₂_right_unitor
attribute [simp]
map₂_id map₂_comp map₂_whisker_left map₂_whisker_right
map₂_associator map₂_left_unitor map₂_right_unitor
section
open iso
/-- The prelax functor between the underlying quivers. -/
add_decl_doc pseudofunctor.to_prelax_functor
instance has_coe_to_prelax_functor : has_coe (pseudofunctor B C) (prelax_functor B C) :=
⟨to_prelax_functor⟩
variables (F : pseudofunctor B C)
@[simp] lemma to_prelax_functor_eq_coe : F.to_prelax_functor = F := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_prelax_functor_obj : (F : prelax_functor B C).obj = F.obj := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_prelax_functor_map : @prelax_functor.map B _ _ C _ _ F = @map _ _ _ _ F := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_prelax_functor_map₂ : @prelax_functor.map₂ B _ _ C _ _ F = @map₂ _ _ _ _ F := rfl
/-- The oplax functor associated with a pseudofunctor. -/
def to_oplax : oplax_functor B C :=
{ map_id := λ a, (F.map_id a).hom,
map_comp := λ a b c f g, (F.map_comp f g).hom,
.. (F : prelax_functor B C) }
instance has_coe_to_oplax : has_coe (pseudofunctor B C) (oplax_functor B C) := ⟨to_oplax⟩
@[simp] lemma to_oplax_eq_coe : F.to_oplax = F := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_oplax_obj : (F : oplax_functor B C).obj = F.obj := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_oplax_map : @oplax_functor.map B _ C _ F = @map _ _ _ _ F := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_oplax_map₂ : @oplax_functor.map₂ B _ C _ F = @map₂ _ _ _ _ F := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_oplax_map_id (a : B) : (F : oplax_functor B C).map_id a = (F.map_id a).hom := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_oplax_map_comp {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(F : oplax_functor B C).map_comp f g = (F.map_comp f g).hom := rfl
/-- Function on 1-morphisms as a functor. -/
@[simps]
def map_functor (a b : B) : (a ⟶ b) ⥤ (F.obj a ⟶ F.obj b) :=
(F : oplax_functor B C).map_functor a b
/-- The identity pseudofunctor. -/
@[simps]
def id (B : Type u₁) [bicategory.{w₁ v₁} B] : pseudofunctor B B :=
{ map_id := λ a, iso.refl (𝟙 a),
map_comp := λ a b c f g, iso.refl (f ≫ g),
.. prelax_functor.id B }
instance : inhabited (pseudofunctor B B) := ⟨id B⟩
/-- Composition of pseudofunctors. -/
@[simps]
def comp (F : pseudofunctor B C) (G : pseudofunctor C D) : pseudofunctor B D :=
{ map_id := λ a, (G.map_functor _ _).map_iso (F.map_id a) ≪≫ G.map_id (F.obj a),
map_comp := λ a b c f g,
(G.map_functor _ _).map_iso (F.map_comp f g) ≪≫ G.map_comp (F.map f) (F.map g),
.. (F : prelax_functor B C).comp ↑G }
/--
Construct a pseudofunctor from an oplax functor whose `map_id` and `map_comp` are isomorphisms.
-/
@[simps]
def mk_of_oplax (F : oplax_functor B C) (F' : F.pseudo_core) : pseudofunctor B C :=
{ map_id := F'.map_id_iso,
map_comp := λ _ _ _, F'.map_comp_iso,
map₂_whisker_left' := λ a b c f g h η, by
{ dsimp,
rw [F'.map_comp_iso_hom f g, ←F.map_comp_naturality_right_assoc,
←F'.map_comp_iso_hom f h, hom_inv_id, comp_id] },
map₂_whisker_right' := λ a b c f g η h, by
{ dsimp,
rw [F'.map_comp_iso_hom f h, ←F.map_comp_naturality_left_assoc,
←F'.map_comp_iso_hom g h, hom_inv_id, comp_id] },
map₂_associator' := λ a b c d f g h, by
{ dsimp,
rw [F'.map_comp_iso_hom (f ≫ g) h, F'.map_comp_iso_hom f g, ←F.map₂_associator_assoc,
←F'.map_comp_iso_hom f (g ≫ h), ←F'.map_comp_iso_hom g h,
hom_inv_whisker_left_assoc, hom_inv_id, comp_id] },
.. (F : prelax_functor B C) }
/--
Construct a pseudofunctor from an oplax functor whose `map_id` and `map_comp` are isomorphisms.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable
def mk_of_oplax' (F : oplax_functor B C)
[∀ a, is_iso (F.map_id a)] [∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), is_iso (F.map_comp f g)] :
pseudofunctor B C :=
{ map_id := λ a, as_iso (F.map_id a),
map_comp := λ a b c f g, as_iso (F.map_comp f g),
map₂_whisker_left' := λ a b c f g h η, by
{ dsimp,
rw [←assoc, is_iso.eq_comp_inv, F.map_comp_naturality_right] },
map₂_whisker_right' := λ a b c f g η h, by
{ dsimp,
rw [←assoc, is_iso.eq_comp_inv, F.map_comp_naturality_left] },
map₂_associator' := λ a b c d f g h, by
{ dsimp,
simp only [←assoc],
rw [is_iso.eq_comp_inv, ←inv_whisker_left, is_iso.eq_comp_inv],
simp only [assoc, F.map₂_associator] },
.. (F : prelax_functor B C) }
end
end pseudofunctor
end
end category_theory
|
d446ebcd353c21d9e6ce51d163ad4536f28550c7 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/ring_theory/witt_vector/verschiebung.lean | 24286e1adef511c6faeaf69256e436af2e57fe67 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,980 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import ring_theory.witt_vector.basic
import ring_theory.witt_vector.is_poly
/-!
## The Verschiebung operator
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
namespace witt_vector
open mv_polynomial
variables {p : ℕ} {R S : Type*} [hp : fact p.prime] [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S]
local notation `𝕎` := witt_vector p -- type as `\bbW`
noncomputable theory
/--
`verschiebung_fun x` shifts the coefficients of `x` up by one,
by inserting 0 as the 0th coefficient.
`x.coeff i` then becomes `(verchiebung_fun x).coeff (i + 1)`.
`verschiebung_fun` is the underlying function of the additive monoid hom `witt_vector.verschiebung`.
-/
def verschiebung_fun (x : 𝕎 R) : 𝕎 R :=
mk p $ λ n, if n = 0 then 0 else x.coeff (n - 1)
lemma verschiebung_fun_coeff (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
(verschiebung_fun x).coeff n = if n = 0 then 0 else x.coeff (n - 1) :=
by rw [verschiebung_fun, coeff_mk]
lemma verschiebung_fun_coeff_zero (x : 𝕎 R) :
(verschiebung_fun x).coeff 0 = 0 :=
by rw [verschiebung_fun_coeff, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] lemma verschiebung_fun_coeff_succ (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
(verschiebung_fun x).coeff n.succ = x.coeff n := rfl
include hp
@[ghost_simps] lemma ghost_component_zero_verschiebung_fun (x : 𝕎 R) :
ghost_component 0 (verschiebung_fun x) = 0 :=
by rw [ghost_component_apply, aeval_witt_polynomial, finset.range_one, finset.sum_singleton,
verschiebung_fun_coeff_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_one, one_mul]
@[ghost_simps] lemma ghost_component_verschiebung_fun (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
ghost_component (n + 1) (verschiebung_fun x) = p * ghost_component n x :=
begin
simp only [ghost_component_apply, aeval_witt_polynomial],
rw [finset.sum_range_succ', verschiebung_fun_coeff, if_pos rfl, zero_pow (pow_pos hp.1.pos _),
mul_zero, add_zero, finset.mul_sum, finset.sum_congr rfl],
rintro i -,
simp only [pow_succ, mul_assoc, verschiebung_fun_coeff, if_neg (nat.succ_ne_zero i),
nat.succ_sub_succ, tsub_zero]
end
omit hp
/--
The 0th Verschiebung polynomial is 0. For `n > 0`, the `n`th Verschiebung polynomial is the
variable `X (n-1)`.
-/
def verschiebung_poly (n : ℕ) : mv_polynomial ℕ ℤ :=
if n = 0 then 0 else X (n-1)
@[simp] lemma verschiebung_poly_zero :
verschiebung_poly 0 = 0 := rfl
lemma aeval_verschiebung_poly' (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
aeval x.coeff (verschiebung_poly n) = (verschiebung_fun x).coeff n :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp only [verschiebung_poly, verschiebung_fun_coeff_zero, if_pos rfl, alg_hom.map_zero] },
{ rw [verschiebung_poly, verschiebung_fun_coeff_succ, if_neg (n.succ_ne_zero),
aeval_X, nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_tsub_cancel_right] }
end
variable (p)
/--
`witt_vector.verschiebung` has polynomial structure given by `witt_vector.verschiebung_poly`.
-/
@[is_poly] lemma verschiebung_fun_is_poly : is_poly p (λ R _Rcr, @verschiebung_fun p R _Rcr) :=
begin
use verschiebung_poly,
simp only [aeval_verschiebung_poly', eq_self_iff_true, forall_3_true_iff]
end
variable {p}
include hp
/--
`verschiebung x` shifts the coefficients of `x` up by one, by inserting 0 as the 0th coefficient.
`x.coeff i` then becomes `(verchiebung x).coeff (i + 1)`.
This is a additive monoid hom with underlying function `verschiebung_fun`.
-/
noncomputable
def verschiebung : 𝕎 R →+ 𝕎 R :=
{ to_fun := verschiebung_fun,
map_zero' :=
by ext ⟨⟩; rw [verschiebung_fun_coeff]; simp only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true, zero_coeff, if_t_t],
map_add' := by { ghost_calc _ _, rintro ⟨⟩; ghost_simp } }
omit hp
/-- `witt_vector.verschiebung` is a polynomial function. -/
@[is_poly] lemma verschiebung_is_poly : is_poly p (λ R _Rcr, @verschiebung p R hp _Rcr) :=
verschiebung_fun_is_poly p
include hp
/-- verschiebung is a natural transformation -/
@[simp] lemma map_verschiebung (f : R →+* S) (x : 𝕎 R) :
map f (verschiebung x) = verschiebung (map f x) :=
by { ext ⟨-, -⟩, exact f.map_zero, refl }
@[ghost_simps] lemma ghost_component_zero_verschiebung (x : 𝕎 R) :
ghost_component 0 (verschiebung x) = 0 :=
ghost_component_zero_verschiebung_fun _
@[ghost_simps] lemma ghost_component_verschiebung (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
ghost_component (n + 1) (verschiebung x) = p * ghost_component n x :=
ghost_component_verschiebung_fun _ _
@[simp] lemma verschiebung_coeff_zero (x : 𝕎 R) :
(verschiebung x).coeff 0 = 0 := rfl
-- simp_nf complains if this is simp
lemma verschiebung_coeff_add_one (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
(verschiebung x).coeff (n + 1) = x.coeff n := rfl
@[simp] lemma verschiebung_coeff_succ (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
(verschiebung x).coeff n.succ = x.coeff n := rfl
lemma aeval_verschiebung_poly (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
aeval x.coeff (verschiebung_poly n) = (verschiebung x).coeff n :=
aeval_verschiebung_poly' x n
@[simp]
lemma bind₁_verschiebung_poly_witt_polynomial (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ verschiebung_poly (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) =
if n = 0 then 0 else p * witt_polynomial p ℤ (n-1) :=
begin
apply mv_polynomial.funext,
intro x,
split_ifs with hn,
{ simp only [hn, verschiebung_poly_zero, witt_polynomial_zero, bind₁_X_right] },
{ obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn,
rw [nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_tsub_cancel_right, ring_hom.map_mul,
map_nat_cast, hom_bind₁],
calc _
= ghost_component (n + 1) (verschiebung $ mk p x) : _
... = _ : _,
{ apply eval₂_hom_congr (ring_hom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl,
simp only [←aeval_verschiebung_poly, coeff_mk],
funext k,
exact eval₂_hom_congr (ring_hom.ext_int _ _) rfl rfl },
{ rw [ghost_component_verschiebung], refl } }
end
end witt_vector
|
fcdbaa2085b313ffbe7d396baba43eb600dafd56 | 3c9dc4ea6cc92e02634ef557110bde9eae393338 | /stage0/src/Lean/Elab/Import.lean | 81a8b9126009eaeb07e269b89ea697a3ddf4ad78 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shingtaklam1324/lean4 | 3d7efe0c8743a4e33d3c6f4adbe1300df2e71492 | 351285a2e8ad0cef37af05851cfabf31edfb5970 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,827,679,740 | 1,610,462,623,000 | 1,610,552,340,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,902 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Parser.Module
namespace Lean.Elab
def headerToImports (header : Syntax) : List Import :=
let imports := if header[0].isNone then [{ module := `Init : Import }] else []
imports ++ header[1].getArgs.toList.map fun stx =>
-- `stx` is of the form `(Module.import "import" "runtime"? id)
let runtime := !stx[1].isNone
let id := stx[2].getId
{ module := id, runtimeOnly := runtime }
def processHeader (header : Syntax) (opts : Options) (messages : MessageLog) (inputCtx : Parser.InputContext) (trustLevel : UInt32 := 0)
: IO (Environment × MessageLog) := do
try
let env ← importModules (headerToImports header) opts trustLevel
pure (env, messages)
catch e =>
let env ← mkEmptyEnvironment
let spos := header.getPos.getD 0
let pos := inputCtx.fileMap.toPosition spos
pure (env, messages.add { fileName := inputCtx.fileName, data := toString e, pos := pos })
def parseImports (input : String) (fileName : Option String := none) : IO (List Import × Position × MessageLog) := do
let fileName := fileName.getD "<input>"
let inputCtx := Parser.mkInputContext input fileName
let (header, parserState, messages) ← Parser.parseHeader inputCtx
pure (headerToImports header, inputCtx.fileMap.toPosition parserState.pos, messages)
@[export lean_parse_imports]
def parseImportsExport (input : String) (fileName : Option String) : IO (List Import × Position × List Message) := do
let (imports, pos, log) ← parseImports input fileName
pure (imports, pos, log.toList)
@[export lean_print_deps]
def printDeps (deps : List Import) : IO Unit := do
for dep in deps do
let fname ← findOLean dep.module;
IO.println fname
end Lean.Elab
|
9d5e266f16a65aa37ce05df2d7c5b2c98bc9e0ef | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/category_theory/monad/algebra.lean | 59e143acc3ad04d8928e50b6f16599ad1b3db033 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,060 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.monad.basic
import category_theory.adjunction.basic
/-!
# Eilenberg-Moore (co)algebras for a (co)monad
This file defines Eilenberg-Moore (co)algebras for a (co)monad,
and provides the category instance for them.
Further it defines the adjoint pair of free and forgetful functors, respectively
from and to the original category, as well as the adjoint pair of forgetful and
cofree functors, respectively from and to the original category.
## References
* [Riehl, *Category theory in context*, Section 5.2.4][riehl2017]
-/
namespace category_theory
open category
universes v₁ u₁ -- morphism levels before object levels. See note [category_theory universes].
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C]
namespace monad
/-- An Eilenberg-Moore algebra for a monad `T`.
cf Definition 5.2.3 in [Riehl][riehl2017]. -/
structure algebra (T : monad C) : Type (max u₁ v₁) :=
(A : C)
(a : (T : C ⥤ C).obj A ⟶ A)
(unit' : T.η.app A ≫ a = 𝟙 A . obviously)
(assoc' : T.μ.app A ≫ a = (T : C ⥤ C).map a ≫ a . obviously)
restate_axiom algebra.unit'
restate_axiom algebra.assoc'
attribute [reassoc] algebra.unit algebra.assoc
namespace algebra
variables {T : monad C}
/-- A morphism of Eilenberg–Moore algebras for the monad `T`. -/
@[ext] structure hom (A B : algebra T) :=
(f : A.A ⟶ B.A)
(h' : (T : C ⥤ C).map f ≫ B.a = A.a ≫ f . obviously)
restate_axiom hom.h'
attribute [simp, reassoc] hom.h
namespace hom
/-- The identity homomorphism for an Eilenberg–Moore algebra. -/
def id (A : algebra T) : hom A A :=
{ f := 𝟙 A.A }
instance (A : algebra T) : inhabited (hom A A) := ⟨{ f := 𝟙 _ }⟩
/-- Composition of Eilenberg–Moore algebra homomorphisms. -/
def comp {P Q R : algebra T} (f : hom P Q) (g : hom Q R) : hom P R :=
{ f := f.f ≫ g.f }
end hom
instance : category_struct (algebra T) :=
{ hom := hom,
id := hom.id,
comp := @hom.comp _ _ _ }
@[simp] lemma comp_eq_comp {A A' A'' : algebra T} (f : A ⟶ A') (g : A' ⟶ A'') :
algebra.hom.comp f g = f ≫ g := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_eq_id (A : algebra T) :
algebra.hom.id A = 𝟙 A := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_f (A : algebra T) : (𝟙 A : A ⟶ A).f = 𝟙 A.A := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_f {A A' A'' : algebra T} (f : A ⟶ A') (g : A' ⟶ A'') :
(f ≫ g).f = f.f ≫ g.f := rfl
/-- The category of Eilenberg-Moore algebras for a monad.
cf Definition 5.2.4 in [Riehl][riehl2017]. -/
instance EilenbergMoore : category (algebra T) := {}.
/--
To construct an isomorphism of algebras, it suffices to give an isomorphism of the carriers which
commutes with the structure morphisms.
-/
@[simps]
def iso_mk {A B : algebra T} (h : A.A ≅ B.A) (w : (T : C ⥤ C).map h.hom ≫ B.a = A.a ≫ h.hom) :
A ≅ B :=
{ hom := { f := h.hom },
inv :=
{ f := h.inv,
h' := by { rw [h.eq_comp_inv, category.assoc, ←w, ←functor.map_comp_assoc], simp } } }
end algebra
variables (T : monad C)
/-- The forgetful functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category, forgetting the algebraic structure. -/
@[simps] def forget : algebra T ⥤ C :=
{ obj := λ A, A.A,
map := λ A B f, f.f }
/-- The free functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category, constructing an algebra for any object. -/
@[simps] def free : C ⥤ algebra T :=
{ obj := λ X,
{ A := T.obj X,
a := T.μ.app X,
assoc' := (T.assoc _).symm },
map := λ X Y f,
{ f := T.map f,
h' := T.μ.naturality _ } }
instance [inhabited C] : inhabited (algebra T) :=
⟨(free T).obj default⟩
/-- The adjunction between the free and forgetful constructions for Eilenberg-Moore algebras for
a monad. cf Lemma 5.2.8 of [Riehl][riehl2017]. -/
-- The other two `simps` projection lemmas can be derived from these two, so `simp_nf` complains if
-- those are added too
@[simps unit counit]
def adj : T.free ⊣ T.forget :=
adjunction.mk_of_hom_equiv
{ hom_equiv := λ X Y,
{ to_fun := λ f, T.η.app X ≫ f.f,
inv_fun := λ f,
{ f := T.map f ≫ Y.a,
h' := by { dsimp, simp [←Y.assoc, ←T.μ.naturality_assoc] } },
left_inv := λ f, by { ext, dsimp, simp },
right_inv := λ f,
begin
dsimp only [forget_obj, monad_to_functor_eq_coe],
rw [←T.η.naturality_assoc, Y.unit],
apply category.comp_id,
end }}
/--
Given an algebra morphism whose carrier part is an isomorphism, we get an algebra isomorphism.
-/
lemma algebra_iso_of_iso {A B : algebra T} (f : A ⟶ B) [is_iso f.f] : is_iso f :=
⟨⟨{ f := inv f.f,
h' := by { rw [is_iso.eq_comp_inv f.f, category.assoc, ← f.h], simp } }, by tidy⟩⟩
instance forget_reflects_iso : reflects_isomorphisms T.forget :=
{ reflects := λ A B, algebra_iso_of_iso T }
instance forget_faithful : faithful T.forget := {}
instance : is_right_adjoint T.forget := ⟨T.free, T.adj⟩
@[simp] lemma left_adjoint_forget : left_adjoint T.forget = T.free := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_right_adjoint_forget : adjunction.of_right_adjoint T.forget = T.adj := rfl
/--
Given a monad morphism from `T₂` to `T₁`, we get a functor from the algebras of `T₁` to algebras of
`T₂`.
-/
@[simps]
def algebra_functor_of_monad_hom {T₁ T₂ : monad C} (h : T₂ ⟶ T₁) :
algebra T₁ ⥤ algebra T₂ :=
{ obj := λ A,
{ A := A.A,
a := h.app A.A ≫ A.a,
unit' := by { dsimp, simp [A.unit] },
assoc' := by { dsimp, simp [A.assoc] } },
map := λ A₁ A₂ f,
{ f := f.f } }
/--
The identity monad morphism induces the identity functor from the category of algebras to itself.
-/
@[simps {rhs_md := semireducible}]
def algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_id {T₁ : monad C} :
algebra_functor_of_monad_hom (𝟙 T₁) ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
nat_iso.of_components
(λ X, algebra.iso_mk (iso.refl _) (by { dsimp, simp, }))
(λ X Y f, by { ext, dsimp, simp })
/--
A composition of monad morphisms gives the composition of corresponding functors.
-/
@[simps {rhs_md := semireducible}]
def algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_comp {T₁ T₂ T₃ : monad C} (f : T₁ ⟶ T₂) (g : T₂ ⟶ T₃) :
algebra_functor_of_monad_hom (f ≫ g) ≅
algebra_functor_of_monad_hom g ⋙ algebra_functor_of_monad_hom f :=
nat_iso.of_components
(λ X, algebra.iso_mk (iso.refl _) (by { dsimp, simp }))
(λ X Y f, by { ext, dsimp, simp })
/--
If `f` and `g` are two equal morphisms of monads, then the functors of algebras induced by them
are isomorphic.
We define it like this as opposed to using `eq_to_iso` so that the components are nicer to prove
lemmas about.
-/
@[simps {rhs_md := semireducible}]
def algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_eq {T₁ T₂ : monad C} {f g : T₁ ⟶ T₂} (h : f = g) :
algebra_functor_of_monad_hom f ≅ algebra_functor_of_monad_hom g :=
nat_iso.of_components
(λ X, algebra.iso_mk (iso.refl _) (by { dsimp, simp [h] }))
(λ X Y f, by { ext, dsimp, simp })
/--
Isomorphic monads give equivalent categories of algebras. Furthermore, they are equivalent as
categories over `C`, that is, we have `algebra_equiv_of_iso_monads h ⋙ forget = forget`.
-/
@[simps]
def algebra_equiv_of_iso_monads {T₁ T₂ : monad C} (h : T₁ ≅ T₂) :
algebra T₁ ≌ algebra T₂ :=
{ functor := algebra_functor_of_monad_hom h.inv,
inverse := algebra_functor_of_monad_hom h.hom,
unit_iso :=
algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_id.symm ≪≫
algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_eq (by simp) ≪≫
algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_comp _ _,
counit_iso :=
(algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_comp _ _).symm ≪≫
algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_eq (by simp) ≪≫
algebra_functor_of_monad_hom_id }
@[simp] lemma algebra_equiv_of_iso_monads_comp_forget {T₁ T₂ : monad C} (h : T₁ ⟶ T₂) :
algebra_functor_of_monad_hom h ⋙ forget _ = forget _ :=
rfl
end monad
namespace comonad
/-- An Eilenberg-Moore coalgebra for a comonad `T`. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure coalgebra (G : comonad C) : Type (max u₁ v₁) :=
(A : C)
(a : A ⟶ (G : C ⥤ C).obj A)
(counit' : a ≫ G.ε.app A = 𝟙 A . obviously)
(coassoc' : a ≫ G.δ.app A = a ≫ G.map a . obviously)
restate_axiom coalgebra.counit'
restate_axiom coalgebra.coassoc'
attribute [reassoc] coalgebra.counit coalgebra.coassoc
namespace coalgebra
variables {G : comonad C}
/-- A morphism of Eilenberg-Moore coalgebras for the comonad `G`. -/
@[ext, nolint has_inhabited_instance] structure hom (A B : coalgebra G) :=
(f : A.A ⟶ B.A)
(h' : A.a ≫ (G : C ⥤ C).map f = f ≫ B.a . obviously)
restate_axiom hom.h'
attribute [simp, reassoc] hom.h
namespace hom
/-- The identity homomorphism for an Eilenberg–Moore coalgebra. -/
def id (A : coalgebra G) : hom A A :=
{ f := 𝟙 A.A }
/-- Composition of Eilenberg–Moore coalgebra homomorphisms. -/
def comp {P Q R : coalgebra G} (f : hom P Q) (g : hom Q R) : hom P R :=
{ f := f.f ≫ g.f }
end hom
/-- The category of Eilenberg-Moore coalgebras for a comonad. -/
instance : category_struct (coalgebra G) :=
{ hom := hom,
id := hom.id,
comp := @hom.comp _ _ _ }
@[simp] lemma comp_eq_comp {A A' A'' : coalgebra G} (f : A ⟶ A') (g : A' ⟶ A'') :
coalgebra.hom.comp f g = f ≫ g := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_eq_id (A : coalgebra G) :
coalgebra.hom.id A = 𝟙 A := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_f (A : coalgebra G) : (𝟙 A : A ⟶ A).f = 𝟙 A.A := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_f {A A' A'' : coalgebra G} (f : A ⟶ A') (g : A' ⟶ A'') :
(f ≫ g).f = f.f ≫ g.f := rfl
/-- The category of Eilenberg-Moore coalgebras for a comonad. -/
instance EilenbergMoore : category (coalgebra G) := {}.
/--
To construct an isomorphism of coalgebras, it suffices to give an isomorphism of the carriers which
commutes with the structure morphisms.
-/
@[simps]
def iso_mk {A B : coalgebra G} (h : A.A ≅ B.A) (w : A.a ≫ (G : C ⥤ C).map h.hom = h.hom ≫ B.a) :
A ≅ B :=
{ hom := { f := h.hom },
inv :=
{ f := h.inv,
h' := by { rw [h.eq_inv_comp, ←reassoc_of w, ←functor.map_comp], simp } } }
end coalgebra
variables (G : comonad C)
/-- The forgetful functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category, forgetting the coalgebraic
structure. -/
@[simps] def forget : coalgebra G ⥤ C :=
{ obj := λ A, A.A,
map := λ A B f, f.f }
/-- The cofree functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category, constructing a coalgebra for any
object. -/
@[simps] def cofree : C ⥤ coalgebra G :=
{ obj := λ X,
{ A := G.obj X,
a := G.δ.app X,
coassoc' := (G.coassoc _).symm },
map := λ X Y f,
{ f := G.map f,
h' := (G.δ.naturality _).symm } }
/--
The adjunction between the cofree and forgetful constructions for Eilenberg-Moore coalgebras
for a comonad.
-/
-- The other two `simps` projection lemmas can be derived from these two, so `simp_nf` complains if
-- those are added too
@[simps unit counit]
def adj : G.forget ⊣ G.cofree :=
adjunction.mk_of_hom_equiv
{ hom_equiv := λ X Y,
{ to_fun := λ f,
{ f := X.a ≫ G.map f,
h' := by { dsimp, simp [←coalgebra.coassoc_assoc] } },
inv_fun := λ g, g.f ≫ G.ε.app Y,
left_inv := λ f,
by { dsimp, rw [category.assoc, G.ε.naturality, functor.id_map, X.counit_assoc] },
right_inv := λ g,
begin
ext1, dsimp,
rw [functor.map_comp, g.h_assoc, cofree_obj_a, comonad.right_counit],
apply comp_id,
end }}
/--
Given a coalgebra morphism whose carrier part is an isomorphism, we get a coalgebra isomorphism.
-/
lemma coalgebra_iso_of_iso {A B : coalgebra G} (f : A ⟶ B) [is_iso f.f] : is_iso f :=
⟨⟨{ f := inv f.f,
h' := by { rw [is_iso.eq_inv_comp f.f, ←f.h_assoc], simp } }, by tidy⟩⟩
instance forget_reflects_iso : reflects_isomorphisms G.forget :=
{ reflects := λ A B, coalgebra_iso_of_iso G }
instance forget_faithful : faithful (forget G) := {}
instance : is_left_adjoint G.forget := ⟨_, G.adj⟩
@[simp] lemma right_adjoint_forget : right_adjoint G.forget = G.cofree := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_left_adjoint_forget : adjunction.of_left_adjoint G.forget = G.adj := rfl
end comonad
end category_theory
|
f008a9c27424a2a286cc5f77f91cc6857416a2f0 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/algebra/lie/cartan_subalgebra.lean | b3acba99e7e817a44e60363c1bf726d2086a9720 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,142 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import algebra.lie.nilpotent
/-!
# Cartan subalgebras
Cartan subalgebras are one of the most important concepts in Lie theory. We define them here.
The standard example is the set of diagonal matrices in the Lie algebra of matrices.
## Main definitions
* `lie_subalgebra.normalizer`
* `lie_subalgebra.le_normalizer_of_ideal`
* `lie_subalgebra.is_cartan_subalgebra`
## Tags
lie subalgebra, normalizer, idealizer, cartan subalgebra
-/
universes u v w w₁ w₂
variables {R : Type u} {L : Type v}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] (H : lie_subalgebra R L)
namespace lie_subalgebra
/-- The normalizer of a Lie subalgebra `H` is the set of elements of the Lie algebra whose bracket
with any element of `H` lies in `H`. It is the Lie algebra equivalent of the group-theoretic
normalizer (see `subgroup.normalizer`) and is an idealizer in the sense of abstract algebra. -/
def normalizer : lie_subalgebra R L :=
{ carrier := { x : L | ∀ (y : L), (y ∈ H) → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ H },
zero_mem' := λ y hy, by { rw zero_lie y, exact H.zero_mem, },
add_mem' := λ z₁ z₂ h₁ h₂ y hy, by { rw add_lie, exact H.add_mem (h₁ y hy) (h₂ y hy), },
smul_mem' := λ t y hy z hz, by { rw smul_lie, exact H.smul_mem t (hy z hz), },
lie_mem' := λ z₁ z₂ h₁ h₂ y hy, by
{ rw lie_lie, exact H.sub_mem (h₁ _ (h₂ y hy)) (h₂ _ (h₁ y hy)), }, }
lemma mem_normalizer_iff (x : L) : x ∈ H.normalizer ↔ ∀ (y : L), (y ∈ H) → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ H := iff.rfl
lemma le_normalizer : H ≤ H.normalizer :=
λ x hx, show ∀ (y : L), y ∈ H → ⁅x,y⁆ ∈ H, from λ y, H.lie_mem hx
/-- A Lie subalgebra is an ideal of its normalizer. -/
lemma ideal_in_normalizer : ∀ (x y : L), x ∈ H.normalizer → y ∈ H → ⁅x,y⁆ ∈ H :=
λ x y h, h y
/-- The normalizer of a Lie subalgebra `H` is the maximal Lie subalgebra in which `H` is a Lie
ideal. -/
lemma le_normalizer_of_ideal {N : lie_subalgebra R L}
(h : ∀ (x y : L), x ∈ N → y ∈ H → ⁅x,y⁆ ∈ H) : N ≤ H.normalizer :=
λ x hx y, h x y hx
/-- A Cartan subalgebra is a nilpotent, self-normalizing subalgebra. -/
class is_cartan_subalgebra : Prop :=
(nilpotent : lie_algebra.is_nilpotent R H)
(self_normalizing : H.normalizer = H)
end lie_subalgebra
@[simp] lemma lie_ideal.normalizer_eq_top {R : Type u} {L : Type v}
[comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] (I : lie_ideal R L) :
(I : lie_subalgebra R L).normalizer = ⊤ :=
begin
ext x,
simpa only [lie_subalgebra.mem_normalizer_iff, lie_subalgebra.mem_top, iff_true]
using λ y hy, I.lie_mem hy
end
open lie_ideal
/-- A nilpotent Lie algebra is its own Cartan subalgebra. -/
instance lie_algebra.top_is_cartan_subalgebra_of_nilpotent [lie_algebra.is_nilpotent R L] :
lie_subalgebra.is_cartan_subalgebra (⊤ : lie_subalgebra R L) :=
{ nilpotent := infer_instance,
self_normalizing :=
by { rw [← top_coe_lie_subalgebra, normalizer_eq_top, top_coe_lie_subalgebra], }, }
|
8b37fe3514c127d6a18ea733a43eaa906d441470 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/data/real/conjugate_exponents.lean | 11931ee0b8ebae79bb5537bafa0b10eeec8206f6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,153 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.real.ennreal
/-!
# Real conjugate exponents
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
`p.is_conjugate_exponent q` registers the fact that the real numbers `p` and `q` are `> 1` and
satisfy `1/p + 1/q = 1`. This property shows up often in analysis, especially when dealing with
`L^p` spaces.
We make several basic facts available through dot notation in this situation.
We also introduce `p.conjugate_exponent` for `p / (p-1)`. When `p > 1`, it is conjugate to `p`.
-/
noncomputable theory
namespace real
/-- Two real exponents `p, q` are conjugate if they are `> 1` and satisfy the equality
`1/p + 1/q = 1`. This condition shows up in many theorems in analysis, notably related to `L^p`
norms. -/
structure is_conjugate_exponent (p q : ℝ) : Prop :=
(one_lt : 1 < p)
(inv_add_inv_conj : 1/p + 1/q = 1)
/-- The conjugate exponent of `p` is `q = p/(p-1)`, so that `1/p + 1/q = 1`. -/
def conjugate_exponent (p : ℝ) : ℝ := p/(p-1)
namespace is_conjugate_exponent
variables {p q : ℝ} (h : p.is_conjugate_exponent q)
include h
/- Register several non-vanishing results following from the fact that `p` has a conjugate exponent
`q`: many computations using these exponents require clearing out denominators, which can be done
with `field_simp` given a proof that these denominators are non-zero, so we record the most usual
ones. -/
lemma pos : 0 < p :=
lt_trans zero_lt_one h.one_lt
lemma nonneg : 0 ≤ p := le_of_lt h.pos
lemma ne_zero : p ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt h.pos
lemma sub_one_pos : 0 < p - 1 :=
sub_pos.2 h.one_lt
lemma sub_one_ne_zero : p - 1 ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt h.sub_one_pos
lemma one_div_pos : 0 < 1/p :=
one_div_pos.2 h.pos
lemma one_div_nonneg : 0 ≤ 1/p :=
le_of_lt h.one_div_pos
lemma one_div_ne_zero : 1/p ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (h.one_div_pos)
lemma conj_eq : q = p/(p-1) :=
begin
have := h.inv_add_inv_conj,
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', one_div, inv_eq_iff_eq_inv] at this,
field_simp [this, h.ne_zero]
end
lemma conjugate_eq : conjugate_exponent p = q := h.conj_eq.symm
lemma sub_one_mul_conj : (p - 1) * q = p :=
mul_comm q (p - 1) ▸ (eq_div_iff h.sub_one_ne_zero).1 h.conj_eq
lemma mul_eq_add : p * q = p + q :=
by simpa only [sub_mul, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, one_mul] using h.sub_one_mul_conj
@[symm] protected lemma symm : q.is_conjugate_exponent p :=
{ one_lt := by { rw [h.conj_eq], exact (one_lt_div h.sub_one_pos).mpr (sub_one_lt p) },
inv_add_inv_conj := by simpa [add_comm] using h.inv_add_inv_conj }
lemma div_conj_eq_sub_one : p / q = p - 1 :=
begin
field_simp [h.symm.ne_zero],
rw h.sub_one_mul_conj
end
lemma one_lt_nnreal : 1 < real.to_nnreal p :=
begin
rw [←real.to_nnreal_one, real.to_nnreal_lt_to_nnreal_iff h.pos],
exact h.one_lt,
end
lemma inv_add_inv_conj_nnreal : 1 / real.to_nnreal p + 1 / real.to_nnreal q = 1 :=
by rw [← real.to_nnreal_one, ← real.to_nnreal_div' h.nonneg, ← real.to_nnreal_div' h.symm.nonneg,
← real.to_nnreal_add h.one_div_nonneg h.symm.one_div_nonneg, h.inv_add_inv_conj]
lemma inv_add_inv_conj_ennreal : 1 / ennreal.of_real p + 1 / ennreal.of_real q = 1 :=
by rw [← ennreal.of_real_one, ← ennreal.of_real_div_of_pos h.pos,
← ennreal.of_real_div_of_pos h.symm.pos,
← ennreal.of_real_add h.one_div_nonneg h.symm.one_div_nonneg, h.inv_add_inv_conj]
end is_conjugate_exponent
lemma is_conjugate_exponent_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 1 < p) :
p.is_conjugate_exponent q ↔ q = p/(p-1) :=
⟨λ H, H.conj_eq, λ H, ⟨h, by field_simp [H, ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one h)]⟩⟩
lemma is_conjugate_exponent_conjugate_exponent {p : ℝ} (h : 1 < p) :
p.is_conjugate_exponent (conjugate_exponent p) :=
(is_conjugate_exponent_iff h).2 rfl
lemma is_conjugate_exponent_one_div {a b : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
(1 / a).is_conjugate_exponent (1 / b) :=
⟨by { rw [lt_div_iff ha, one_mul], linarith }, by { simp_rw one_div_one_div, exact hab }⟩
end real
|
66fda964200c41c100e10dfcf21f008f5828f387 | acc85b4be2c618b11fc7cb3005521ae6858a8d07 | /data/seq/wseq.lean | 5551922adad638fcb91ab7132a51dab7252221fb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | linpingchuan/mathlib | d49990b236574df2a45d9919ba43c923f693d341 | 5ad8020f67eb13896a41cc7691d072c9331b1f76 | refs/heads/master | 1,626,019,377,808 | 1,508,048,784,000 | 1,508,048,784,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 51,829 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.seq.seq data.seq.computation data.list.basic data.dlist
universes u v w
-- While the `seq` structure allows for lists which may not be finite,
-- a weak sequence also allows the computation of each element to
-- involve an indeterminate amount of computation, including possibly
-- an infinite loop. This is represented as a regular `seq` interspersed
-- with `none` elements to indicate that computation is ongoing.
--
-- This model is appropriate for Haskell style lazy lists, and is closed
-- under most interesting computation patterns on infinite lists,
-- but conversely it is difficult to extract elements from it.
/-
coinductive wseq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : wseq α
| cons : α → wseq α → wseq α
| think : wseq α → wseq α
-/
def wseq (α) := seq (option α)
namespace wseq
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
def of_seq : seq α → wseq α := (<$>) some
def of_list (l : list α) : wseq α := of_seq l
def of_stream (l : stream α) : wseq α := of_seq l
instance coe_seq : has_coe (seq α) (wseq α) := ⟨of_seq⟩
instance coe_list : has_coe (list α) (wseq α) := ⟨of_list⟩
instance coe_stream : has_coe (stream α) (wseq α) := ⟨of_stream⟩
def nil : wseq α := seq.nil
def cons (a : α) : wseq α → wseq α := seq.cons (some a)
def think : wseq α → wseq α := seq.cons none
def destruct : wseq α → computation (option (α × wseq α)) :=
computation.corec (λs, match seq.destruct s with
| none := sum.inl none
| some (none, s') := sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') := sum.inl (some (a, s'))
end)
def cases_on {C : wseq α → Sort v} (s : wseq α) (h1 : C nil)
(h2 : ∀ x s, C (cons x s)) (h3 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
seq.cases_on s h1 (λ o, option.cases_on o h3 h2)
protected def mem (a : α) (s : wseq α) := seq.mem (some a) s
instance : has_mem α (wseq α) :=
⟨wseq.mem⟩
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α := seq.not_mem_nil a
def head (s : wseq α) : computation (option α) :=
computation.map ((<$>) prod.fst) (destruct s)
def flatten : computation (wseq α) → wseq α :=
seq.corec (λc, match computation.destruct c with
| sum.inl s := seq.omap return (seq.destruct s)
| sum.inr c' := some (none, c')
end)
def tail (s : wseq α) : wseq α :=
flatten $ (λo, option.rec_on o nil prod.snd) <$> destruct s
def drop (s : wseq α) : ℕ → wseq α
| 0 := s
| (n+1) := tail (drop n)
attribute [simp] drop
def nth (s : wseq α) (n : ℕ) : computation (option α) := head (drop s n)
def to_list (s : wseq α) : computation (list α) :=
@computation.corec (list α) (list α × wseq α) (λ⟨l, s⟩,
match seq.destruct s with
| none := sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') := sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') := sum.inr (a::l, s')
end) ([], s)
def length (s : wseq α) : computation ℕ :=
@computation.corec ℕ (ℕ × wseq α) (λ⟨n, s⟩,
match seq.destruct s with
| none := sum.inl n
| some (none, s') := sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some a, s') := sum.inr (n+1, s')
end) (0, s)
@[class] def is_finite (s : wseq α) : Prop := (to_list s).terminates
instance to_list_terminates (s : wseq α) [h : is_finite s] : (to_list s).terminates := h
def get (s : wseq α) [is_finite s] : list α := (to_list s).get
@[class] def productive (s : wseq α) : Prop := ∀ n, (nth s n).terminates
instance nth_terminates (s : wseq α) [h : productive s] : ∀ n, (nth s n).terminates := h
instance head_terminates (s : wseq α) [h : productive s] : (head s).terminates := h 0
def update_nth (s : wseq α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : wseq α :=
@seq.corec (option α) (ℕ × wseq α) (λ⟨n, s⟩,
match seq.destruct s, n with
| none, n := none
| some (none, s'), n := some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 := some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), 1 := some (some a, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), (n+2) := some (some a', n+1, s')
end) (n+1, s)
def remove_nth (s : wseq α) (n : ℕ) : wseq α :=
@seq.corec (option α) (ℕ × wseq α) (λ⟨n, s⟩,
match seq.destruct s, n with
| none, n := none
| some (none, s'), n := some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 := some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), 1 := some (none, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), (n+2) := some (some a', n+1, s')
end) (n+1, s)
def filter_map (f : α → option β) : wseq α → wseq β :=
seq.corec (λs, match seq.destruct s with
| none := none
| some (none, s') := some (none, s')
| some (some a, s') := some (f a, s')
end)
def filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : wseq α → wseq α :=
filter_map (λa, if p a then some a else none)
-- example of infinite list manipulations
def find (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : wseq α) : computation (option α) :=
head $ filter p s
def zip_with (f : α → β → γ) (s1 : wseq α) (s2 : wseq β) : wseq γ :=
@seq.corec (option γ) (wseq α × wseq β) (λ⟨s1, s2⟩,
match seq.destruct s1, seq.destruct s2 with
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') := some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (none, s2') := some (none, s1, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some a2, s2') := some (none, s1', s2)
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') := some (some (f a1 a2), s1', s2')
| _, _ := none
end) (s1, s2)
def zip : wseq α → wseq β → wseq (α × β) := zip_with prod.mk
def find_indexes (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : wseq α) : wseq ℕ :=
(zip s (stream.nats : wseq ℕ)).filter_map
(λ ⟨a, n⟩, if p a then some n else none)
def find_index (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : wseq α) : computation ℕ :=
(λ o, option.get_or_else o 0) <$> head (find_indexes p s)
def index_of [decidable_eq α] (a : α) : wseq α → computation ℕ := find_index (eq a)
def indexes_of [decidable_eq α] (a : α) : wseq α → wseq ℕ := find_indexes (eq a)
-- nondeterministic
def union (s1 s2 : wseq α) : wseq α :=
@seq.corec (option α) (wseq α × wseq α) (λ⟨s1, s2⟩,
match seq.destruct s1, seq.destruct s2 with
| none, none := none
| some (a1, s1'), none := some (a1, s1', nil)
| none, some (a2, s2') := some (a2, nil, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') := some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (none, s2') := some (some a1, s1', s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some a2, s2') := some (some a2, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') := some (some a1, cons a2 s1', s2')
end) (s1, s2)
def is_empty (s : wseq α) : computation bool :=
computation.map option.is_none $ head s
-- Calculate one step of computation
def compute (s : wseq α) : wseq α :=
match seq.destruct s with
| some (none, s') := s'
| _ := s
end
def take (s : wseq α) (n : ℕ) : wseq α :=
@seq.corec (option α) (ℕ × wseq α) (λ⟨n, s⟩,
match n, seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ := none
| m+1, none := none
| m+1, some (none, s') := some (none, m+1, s')
| m+1, some (some a, s') := some (some a, m, s')
end) (n, s)
def split_at (s : wseq α) (n : ℕ) : computation (list α × wseq α) :=
@computation.corec (list α × wseq α) (ℕ × list α × wseq α) (λ⟨n, l, s⟩,
match n, seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ := sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| m+1, none := sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| m+1, some (none, s') := sum.inr (n, l, s')
| m+1, some (some a, s') := sum.inr (m, a::l, s')
end) (n, [], s)
def any (s : wseq α) (p : α → bool) : computation bool :=
computation.corec (λs : wseq α,
match seq.destruct s with
| none := sum.inl ff
| some (none, s') := sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') := if p a then sum.inl tt else sum.inr s'
end) s
def all (s : wseq α) (p : α → bool) : computation bool :=
computation.corec (λs : wseq α,
match seq.destruct s with
| none := sum.inl tt
| some (none, s') := sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') := if p a then sum.inr s' else sum.inl ff
end) s
def scanl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s : wseq β) : wseq α :=
cons a $ @seq.corec (option α) (α × wseq β) (λ⟨a, s⟩,
match seq.destruct s with
| none := none
| some (none, s') := some (none, a, s')
| some (some b, s') := let a' := f a b in some (some a', a', s')
end) (a, s)
def inits (s : wseq α) : wseq (list α) :=
cons [] $ @seq.corec (option (list α)) (dlist α × wseq α) (λ ⟨l, s⟩,
match seq.destruct s with
| none := none
| some (none, s') := some (none, l, s')
| some (some a, s') := let l' := l.concat a in
some (some l'.to_list, l', s')
end) (dlist.empty, s)
-- Like take, but does not wait for a result
def collect (s : wseq α) (n : ℕ) : list α :=
(seq.take n s).filter_map id
def append : wseq α → wseq α → wseq α := seq.append
def map (f : α → β) : wseq α → wseq β := seq.map (option.map f)
def join (S : wseq (wseq α)) : wseq α :=
seq.join ((λo : option (wseq α), match o with
| none := seq1.ret none
| some s := (none, s)
end) <$> S)
def bind (s : wseq α) (f : α → wseq β) : wseq β :=
join (map f s)
def lift_rel_o (R : α → β → Prop) (C : wseq α → wseq β → Prop) :
option (α × wseq α) → option (β × wseq β) → Prop
| none none := true
| (some (a, s)) (some (b, t)) := R a b ∧ C s t
| _ _ := false
attribute [simp] lift_rel_o
theorem lift_rel_o.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} {C D : wseq α → wseq β → Prop}
(H1 : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) (H2 : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) :
∀ {o p}, lift_rel_o R C o p → lift_rel_o S D o p
| none none h := trivial
| (some (a, s)) (some (b, t)) h := and.imp (H1 _ _) (H2 _ _) h
| none (some _) h := false.elim h
| (some (_, _)) none h := false.elim h
theorem lift_rel_o.imp_right (R : α → β → Prop) {C D : wseq α → wseq β → Prop}
(H : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) {o p} : lift_rel_o R C o p → lift_rel_o R D o p :=
lift_rel_o.imp (λ _ _, id) H
def bisim_o (R : wseq α → wseq α → Prop) :
option (α × wseq α) → option (α × wseq α) → Prop := lift_rel_o (=) R
attribute [simp] bisim_o
theorem bisim_o.imp {R S : wseq α → wseq α → Prop} (H : ∀ s t, R s t → S s t) {o p} :
bisim_o R o p → bisim_o S o p :=
lift_rel_o.imp_right _ H
def lift_rel (R : α → β → Prop) (s : wseq α) (t : wseq β) : Prop :=
∃ C : wseq α → wseq β → Prop, C s t ∧
∀ {s t}, C s t → computation.lift_rel (lift_rel_o R C) (destruct s) (destruct t)
-- If two sequences are equivalent, then they have the same values and
-- the same computational behavior (i.e. if one loops forever then so does
-- the other), although they may differ in the number of `think`s needed to
-- arrive at the answer.
def equiv : wseq α → wseq α → Prop := lift_rel (=)
theorem lift_rel_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s : wseq α} {t : wseq β} :
lift_rel R s t →
computation.lift_rel (lift_rel_o R (lift_rel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t)
| ⟨R, h1, h2⟩ :=
by refine computation.lift_rel.imp _ _ _ (h2 h1);
apply lift_rel_o.imp_right; exact λ s' t' h', ⟨R, h', @h2⟩
theorem lift_rel_destruct_iff {R : α → β → Prop} {s : wseq α} {t : wseq β} :
lift_rel R s t ↔
computation.lift_rel (lift_rel_o R (lift_rel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
⟨lift_rel_destruct, λ h, ⟨λ s t, lift_rel R s t ∨
computation.lift_rel (lift_rel_o R (lift_rel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t),
or.inr h, λ s t h, begin
have h : computation.lift_rel (lift_rel_o R (lift_rel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t),
{ cases h with h h, exact lift_rel_destruct h, assumption },
apply computation.lift_rel.imp _ _ _ h,
intros a b, apply lift_rel_o.imp_right,
intros s t, apply or.inl
end⟩⟩
infix ~ := equiv
theorem destruct_congr {s t : wseq α} :
s ~ t → computation.lift_rel (bisim_o (~)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
lift_rel_destruct
theorem destruct_congr_iff {s t : wseq α} :
s ~ t ↔ computation.lift_rel (bisim_o (~)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
lift_rel_destruct_iff
def lift_rel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : reflexive R) : reflexive (lift_rel R) :=
λ s, begin
refine ⟨(=), rfl, λ s t (h : s = t), _⟩,
rw ←h, apply computation.lift_rel.refl,
intro a, cases a with a, simp, cases a; simp, apply H
end
def lift_rel_o.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) :
function.swap (lift_rel_o R C) = lift_rel_o (function.swap R) (function.swap C) :=
funext $ λ x, funext $ λ y,
by cases x with x; [skip, cases x]; { cases y with y; [skip, cases y]; refl }
def lift_rel.swap_lem {R : α → β → Prop} {s1 s2} (h : lift_rel R s1 s2) :
lift_rel (function.swap R) s2 s1 :=
begin
refine ⟨function.swap (lift_rel R), h, λ s t (h : lift_rel R t s), _⟩,
rw [←lift_rel_o.swap, computation.lift_rel.swap],
apply lift_rel_destruct h
end
def lift_rel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) :
function.swap (lift_rel R) = lift_rel (function.swap R) :=
funext $ λ x, funext $ λ y, propext ⟨lift_rel.swap_lem, lift_rel.swap_lem⟩
def lift_rel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : symmetric R) : symmetric (lift_rel R) :=
λ s1 s2 (h : function.swap (lift_rel R) s2 s1),
by rwa [lift_rel.swap, show function.swap R = R, from
funext $ λ a, funext $ λ b, propext $ by constructor; apply H] at h
def lift_rel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : transitive R) : transitive (lift_rel R) :=
λ s t u h1 h2, begin
refine ⟨λ s u, ∃ t, lift_rel R s t ∧ lift_rel R t u, ⟨t, h1, h2⟩, λ s u h, _⟩,
cases h with t h, cases h with h1 h2,
have h1 := lift_rel_destruct h1,
have h2 := lift_rel_destruct h2,
refine computation.lift_rel_def.2
⟨(computation.terminates_of_lift_rel h1).trans
(computation.terminates_of_lift_rel h2), λ a c ha hc, _⟩,
cases h1.left ha with b hb, cases hb with hb t1,
have t2 := computation.rel_of_lift_rel h2 hb hc,
cases a with a; cases c with c,
{ trivial },
{ cases b, {cases t2}, {cases t1} },
{ cases a, cases b with b, {cases t1}, {cases b, cases t2} },
{ cases a with a s, cases b with b, {cases t1},
cases b with b t, cases c with c u,
cases t1 with ab st, cases t2 with bc tu,
exact ⟨H ab bc, t, st, tu⟩ }
end
def lift_rel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : equivalence R → equivalence (lift_rel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ :=
⟨lift_rel.refl R refl, lift_rel.symm R symm, lift_rel.trans R trans⟩
@[refl] theorem equiv.refl : ∀ (s : wseq α), s ~ s :=
lift_rel.refl (=) eq.refl
@[symm] theorem equiv.symm : ∀ {s t : wseq α}, s ~ t → t ~ s :=
lift_rel.symm (=) (@eq.symm _)
@[trans] theorem equiv.trans : ∀ {s t u : wseq α}, s ~ t → t ~ u → s ~ u :=
lift_rel.trans (=) (@eq.trans _)
theorem equiv.equivalence : equivalence (@equiv α) :=
⟨@equiv.refl _, @equiv.symm _, @equiv.trans _⟩
open computation
local notation `return` := computation.return
@[simp] theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : wseq α) = return none :=
computation.destruct_eq_ret rfl
@[simp] theorem destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : destruct (cons a s) = return (some (a, s)) :=
computation.destruct_eq_ret $ by simp [destruct, cons, computation.rmap]
@[simp] theorem destruct_think (s : wseq α) : destruct (think s) = (destruct s).think :=
computation.destruct_eq_think $ by simp [destruct, think, computation.rmap]
@[simp] theorem seq_destruct_nil : seq.destruct (nil : wseq α) = none :=
seq.destruct_nil
@[simp] theorem seq_destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : seq.destruct (cons a s) = some (some a, s) :=
seq.destruct_cons _ _
@[simp] theorem seq_destruct_think (s : wseq α) : seq.destruct (think s) = some (none, s) :=
seq.destruct_cons _ _
@[simp] theorem head_nil : head (nil : wseq α) = return none := by simp [head]; refl
@[simp] theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = return (some a) := by simp [head]; refl
@[simp] theorem head_think (s : wseq α) : head (think s) = (head s).think := by simp [head]; refl
@[simp] theorem flatten_ret (s : wseq α) : flatten (return s) = s :=
begin
refine seq.eq_of_bisim (λs1 s2, flatten (return s2) = s1) _ rfl,
intros s' s h, rw ←h, simp [flatten],
cases seq.destruct s, { simp },
{ cases a with o s', simp }
end
@[simp] theorem flatten_think (c : computation (wseq α)) : flatten c.think = think (flatten c) :=
seq.destruct_eq_cons $ by simp [flatten, think]
@[simp] theorem destruct_flatten (c : computation (wseq α)) : destruct (flatten c) = c >>= destruct :=
begin
refine computation.eq_of_bisim (λc1 c2, c1 = c2 ∨
∃ c, c1 = destruct (flatten c) ∧ c2 = computation.bind c destruct) _ (or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩),
intros c1 c2 h, exact match c1, c2, h with
| _, _, (or.inl $ eq.refl c) := by cases c.destruct; simp
| _, _, (or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩) := begin
apply c.cases_on (λa, _) (λc', _); repeat {simp},
{ cases (destruct a).destruct; simp },
{ exact or.inr ⟨c', rfl, rfl⟩ }
end end
end
theorem head_terminates_iff (s : wseq α) : terminates (head s) ↔ terminates (destruct s) :=
terminates_map_iff _ (destruct s)
@[simp] theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : wseq α) = nil := by simp [tail]
@[simp] theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s) : tail (cons a s) = s := by simp [tail]
@[simp] theorem tail_think (s : wseq α) : tail (think s) = (tail s).think := by simp [tail]
@[simp] theorem dropn_nil (n) :
drop (nil : wseq α) n = nil := by induction n; simp [*, drop]
@[simp] theorem dropn_cons (a : α) (s) (n) :
drop (cons a s) (n+1) = drop s n := by induction n; simp [*, drop]
@[simp] theorem dropn_think (s : wseq α) (n) :
drop (think s) n = (drop s n).think := by induction n; simp [*, drop]
theorem dropn_add (s : wseq α) (m) : ∀ n, drop s (m + n) = drop (drop s m) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := congr_arg tail (dropn_add n)
theorem dropn_tail (s : wseq α) (n) : drop (tail s) n = drop s (n + 1) :=
by rw add_comm; symmetry; apply dropn_add
theorem nth_add (s : wseq α) (m n) : nth s (m + n) = nth (drop s m) n :=
congr_arg head (dropn_add _ _ _)
theorem nth_tail (s : wseq α) (n) : nth (tail s) n = nth s (n + 1) :=
congr_arg head (dropn_tail _ _)
@[simp] def join_nil : join nil = (nil : wseq α) := seq.join_nil
@[simp] def join_think (S : wseq (wseq α)) :
join (think S) = think (join S) :=
by { simp [think, join], unfold has_map.map, simp [join, seq1.ret] }
@[simp] def join_cons (s : wseq α) (S) :
join (cons s S) = think (append s (join S)) :=
by { simp [think, join], unfold has_map.map, simp [join, cons, append] }
@[simp] theorem nil_append (s : wseq α) : append nil s = s := seq.nil_append _
@[simp] theorem cons_append (a : α) (s t) :
append (cons a s) t = cons a (append s t) := seq.cons_append _ _ _
@[simp] theorem think_append (s t : wseq α) :
append (think s) t = think (append s t) := seq.cons_append _ _ _
@[simp] theorem append_nil (s : wseq α) : append s nil = s := seq.append_nil _
@[simp] theorem append_assoc (s t u : wseq α) :
append (append s t) u = append s (append t u) := seq.append_assoc _ _ _
def tail.aux : option (α × wseq α) → computation (option (α × wseq α))
| none := return none
| (some (a, s)) := destruct s
attribute [simp] tail.aux
theorem destruct_tail (s : wseq α) :
destruct (tail s) = destruct s >>= tail.aux :=
begin
dsimp [tail], simp, rw [←monad.bind_pure_comp_eq_map, monad.bind_assoc],
apply congr_arg, apply funext, intro o,
cases o; [skip, cases a with a s];
apply (monad.pure_bind _ _).trans _; simp
end
def drop.aux : ℕ → option (α × wseq α) → computation (option (α × wseq α))
| 0 := return
| (n+1) := λ a, tail.aux a >>= drop.aux n
attribute [simp] drop.aux
def drop.aux_none : ∀ n, @drop.aux α n none = return none
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := show computation.bind (return none) (drop.aux n) = return none,
by rw [ret_bind, drop.aux_none]
attribute [simp] drop.aux
theorem destruct_dropn :
∀ (s : wseq α) n, destruct (drop s n) = destruct s >>= drop.aux n
| s 0 := (bind_ret' _).symm
| s (n+1) := by rw [←dropn_tail, destruct_dropn _ n, destruct_tail, monad.bind_assoc]; refl
theorem head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates (s : wseq α) [T : terminates (head (tail s))] :
terminates (head s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).2 $ begin
cases (head_terminates_iff _).1 T with a h,
simp [tail] at h,
cases exists_of_mem_bind h with s' h1, cases h1 with h1 h2,
unfold has_map.map at h1,
exact let ⟨t, h3, h4⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h1 in terminates_of_mem h3
end
theorem destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some {s : wseq α} {a}
(h : some a ∈ destruct (tail s)) : ∃ a', some a' ∈ destruct s :=
begin
unfold tail has_map.map at h, simp at h,
cases exists_of_mem_bind h with t ht, cases ht with tm td, clear h,
cases exists_of_mem_map tm with t' ht', cases ht' with ht' ht2, clear tm,
cases t' with t'; rw ←ht2 at td; simp at td,
{ have := mem_unique td (ret_mem _), contradiction },
{ exact ⟨_, ht'⟩ }
end
theorem head_some_of_head_tail_some {s : wseq α} {a}
(h : some a ∈ head (tail s)) : ∃ a', some a' ∈ head s :=
begin
unfold head at h,
cases exists_of_mem_map h with o ho, cases ho with md e, clear h,
cases o with o; injection e with h', clear e h',
cases destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some md with a am,
exact ⟨_, mem_map ((<$>) (@prod.fst α (wseq α))) am⟩
end
theorem head_some_of_nth_some {s : wseq α} {a n}
(h : some a ∈ nth s n) : ∃ a', some a' ∈ head s :=
begin
revert a, induction n with n IH; intros,
exacts [⟨_, h⟩, let ⟨a', h'⟩ := head_some_of_head_tail_some h in IH h']
end
instance productive_tail (s : wseq α) [productive s] : productive (tail s) :=
λ n, by rw [nth_tail]; apply_instance
instance productive_dropn (s : wseq α) [productive s] (n) : productive (drop s n) :=
λ m, by rw [←nth_add]; apply_instance
def to_seq (s : wseq α) [productive s] : seq α :=
⟨λ n, (nth s n).get, λn h, begin
ginduction computation.get (nth s (n + 1)) with e, {trivial},
have := mem_of_get_eq _ e,
simp [nth] at this h, cases head_some_of_head_tail_some this with a' h',
have := mem_unique h' (@mem_of_get_eq _ _ _ _ h),
contradiction
end⟩
theorem nth_terminates_le {s : wseq α} {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : terminates (nth s n) → terminates (nth s m) :=
by induction h with m' h IH; [exact id,
exact λ T, IH (@head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates _ _ T)]
theorem head_terminates_of_nth_terminates {s : wseq α} {n} : terminates (nth s n) → terminates (head s) :=
nth_terminates_le (nat.zero_le n)
theorem destruct_terminates_of_nth_terminates {s : wseq α} {n} (T : terminates (nth s n)) : terminates (destruct s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).1 $ head_terminates_of_nth_terminates T
theorem mem_rec_on {C : wseq α → Prop} {a s} (M : a ∈ s)
(h1 : ∀ b s', (a = b ∨ C s') → C (cons b s'))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
begin
apply seq.mem_rec_on M,
intros o s' h, cases o with b,
{ apply h2, cases h, {contradiction}, {assumption} },
{ apply h1, apply or.imp_left _ h, intro h, injection h }
end
@[simp] theorem mem_think (s : wseq α) (a) : a ∈ think s ↔ a ∈ s :=
begin
cases s with f al,
change some (some a) ∈ some none :: f ↔ some (some a) ∈ f,
constructor; intro h,
{ apply (stream.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).resolve_left,
intro, injections },
{ apply stream.mem_cons_of_mem _ h }
end
theorem eq_or_mem_iff_mem {s : wseq α} {a a' s'} :
some (a', s') ∈ destruct s → (a ∈ s ↔ a = a' ∨ a ∈ s') :=
begin
generalize e : destruct s = c, intro h,
revert s, apply computation.mem_rec_on h _ (λ c IH, _); intro s;
apply s.cases_on _ (λ x s, _) (λ s, _); intros m;
have := congr_arg computation.destruct m; simp at this;
injections with i1 i2 i3 i4 i5,
{ rw [i4, i5],
cases s' with f al,
unfold cons has_mem.mem wseq.mem seq.mem seq.cons, simp,
have h_a_eq_a' : a = a' ↔ some (some a) = some (some a'),
{ constructor,
{ intro h, rw h },
{ intro h, injection h with h', injection h' } },
rw [h_a_eq_a'],
refine ⟨stream.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons, λo, _⟩,
{ cases o with e m,
{ rw e, apply stream.mem_cons },
{ exact stream.mem_cons_of_mem _ m } }
},
{ simp, exact IH i2 }
end
@[simp] theorem mem_cons_iff (s : wseq α) (b) {a} : a ∈ cons b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
eq_or_mem_iff_mem $ by simp [ret_mem]
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {s : wseq α} (b) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (or.inr h)
theorem mem_cons (s : wseq α) (a) : a ∈ cons a s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (or.inl rfl)
theorem mem_of_mem_tail {s : wseq α} {a} : a ∈ tail s → a ∈ s :=
begin
intro h, have := h, cases h with n e, revert s, simp [stream.nth],
induction n with n IH; intro s; apply s.cases_on _ (λx s, _) (λ s, _);
repeat{simp}; intros m e; injections,
{ exact or.inr m },
{ exact or.inr m },
{ apply IH m, rw e, cases tail s, refl }
end
theorem mem_of_mem_dropn {s : wseq α} {a} : ∀ {n}, a ∈ drop s n → a ∈ s
| 0 h := h
| (n+1) h := @mem_of_mem_dropn n (mem_of_mem_tail h)
theorem nth_mem {s : wseq α} {a n} : some a ∈ nth s n → a ∈ s :=
begin
revert s, induction n with n IH; intros s h,
{ cases exists_of_mem_map h with o h, cases h with h1 h2,
cases o with o; injection h2 with h',
cases o with a' s',
exact (eq_or_mem_iff_mem h1).2 (or.inl h'.symm) },
{ have := @IH (tail s), rw nth_tail at this,
exact mem_of_mem_tail (this h) }
end
theorem exists_nth_of_mem {s : wseq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, some a ∈ nth s n :=
begin
apply mem_rec_on h,
{ intros a' s' h, cases h with h h,
{ existsi 0, simp [nth], rw h, apply ret_mem },
{ cases h with n h, existsi n+1,
simp [nth], exact h } },
{ intros s' h, cases h with n h,
existsi n, simp [nth], apply think_mem h }
end
theorem exists_dropn_of_mem {s : wseq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
∃ n s', some (a, s') ∈ destruct (drop s n) :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_nth_of_mem h in ⟨n, begin
cases (head_terminates_iff _).1 ⟨_, h⟩ with o om,
have := mem_unique (mem_map _ om) h,
cases o with o; injection this with i,
cases o with a' s', dsimp at i,
rw i at om, exact ⟨_, om⟩
end⟩
theorem lift_rel_dropn_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : lift_rel R s t) :
∀ n, computation.lift_rel (lift_rel_o R (lift_rel R))
(destruct (drop s n)) (destruct (drop t n))
| 0 := lift_rel_destruct H
| (n+1) := begin
simp [destruct_tail],
apply lift_rel_bind,
apply lift_rel_dropn_destruct n,
exact λ a b o, match a, b, o with
| none, none, _ := by simp
| some (a, s), some (b, t), ⟨h1, h2⟩ := by simp [tail.aux]; apply lift_rel_destruct h2
end
end
theorem exists_of_lift_rel_left {R : α → β → Prop} {s t}
(H : lift_rel R s t) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ {b}, b ∈ t ∧ R a b :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_nth_of_mem h,
⟨some (._, s'), sd, rfl⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h,
⟨some (b, t'), td, ⟨ab, _⟩⟩ := (lift_rel_dropn_destruct H n).left sd in
⟨b, nth_mem (mem_map ((<$>) prod.fst.{v v}) td), ab⟩
theorem exists_of_lift_rel_right {R : α → β → Prop} {s t}
(H : lift_rel R s t) {b} (h : b ∈ t) : ∃ {a}, a ∈ s ∧ R a b :=
by rw ←lift_rel.swap at H; exact exists_of_lift_rel_left H h
theorem head_terminates_of_mem {s : wseq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : terminates (head s) :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_nth_of_mem h in head_terminates_of_nth_terminates ⟨_, h⟩
def of_mem_append {s₁ s₂ : wseq α} {a : α} : a ∈ append s₁ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ :=
seq.of_mem_append
def mem_append_left {s₁ s₂ : wseq α} {a : α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ append s₁ s₂ :=
seq.mem_append_left
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} : ∀ {s : wseq α}, b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b
| ⟨g, al⟩ h := let ⟨o, om, oe⟩ := seq.exists_of_mem_map h in
by cases o; injection oe with h'; exact ⟨a, om, h'⟩
@[simp] def lift_rel_nil (R : α → β → Prop) : lift_rel R nil nil :=
by rw [lift_rel_destruct_iff]; simp
@[simp] def lift_rel_cons (R : α → β → Prop) (a b s t) :
lift_rel R (cons a s) (cons b t) ↔ R a b ∧ lift_rel R s t :=
by rw [lift_rel_destruct_iff]; simp
@[simp] def lift_rel_think_left (R : α → β → Prop) (s t) :
lift_rel R (think s) t ↔ lift_rel R s t :=
by rw [lift_rel_destruct_iff, lift_rel_destruct_iff]; simp
@[simp] def lift_rel_think_right (R : α → β → Prop) (s t) :
lift_rel R s (think t) ↔ lift_rel R s t :=
by rw [lift_rel_destruct_iff, lift_rel_destruct_iff]; simp
theorem cons_congr {s t : wseq α} (a : α) (h : s ~ t) : cons a s ~ cons a t :=
by unfold equiv; simp; exact h
theorem think_equiv (s : wseq α) : think s ~ s :=
by unfold equiv; simp; apply equiv.refl
theorem think_congr {s t : wseq α} (a : α) (h : s ~ t) : think s ~ think t :=
by unfold equiv; simp; exact h
theorem head_congr : ∀ {s t : wseq α}, s ~ t → head s ~ head t :=
suffices ∀ {s t : wseq α}, s ~ t → ∀ {o}, o ∈ head s → o ∈ head t, from
λ s t h o, ⟨this h, this h.symm⟩,
begin
intros s t h o ho,
cases @computation.exists_of_mem_map _ _ _ _ (destruct s) ho with ds dsm,
cases dsm with dsm dse, rw ←dse,
cases destruct_congr h with l r,
cases l dsm with dt dtm, cases dtm with dtm dst,
cases ds with a; cases dt with b,
{ apply mem_map _ dtm },
{ cases b, cases dst },
{ cases a, cases dst },
{ cases a with a s', cases b with b t', rw dst.left,
exact @mem_map _ _ (@has_map.map _ _ (α × wseq α) _ prod.fst)
_ (destruct t) dtm }
end
theorem flatten_equiv {c : computation (wseq α)} {s} (h : s ∈ c) : flatten c ~ s :=
begin
apply computation.mem_rec_on h, { simp },
{ intro s', apply equiv.trans, simp [think_equiv] }
end
theorem lift_rel_flatten {R : α → β → Prop} {c1 : computation (wseq α)} {c2 : computation (wseq β)}
(h : c1.lift_rel (lift_rel R) c2) : lift_rel R (flatten c1) (flatten c2) :=
let S := λ s t,
∃ c1 c2, s = flatten c1 ∧ t = flatten c2 ∧ computation.lift_rel (lift_rel R) c1 c2 in
⟨S, ⟨c1, c2, rfl, rfl, h⟩, λ s t h,
match s, t, h with ._, ._, ⟨c1, c2, rfl, rfl, h⟩ := begin
simp, apply lift_rel_bind _ _ h,
intros a b ab, apply computation.lift_rel.imp _ _ _ (lift_rel_destruct ab),
intros a b, apply lift_rel_o.imp_right,
intros s t h, refine ⟨return s, return t, _, _, _⟩; simp [h]
end end⟩
theorem flatten_congr {c1 c2 : computation (wseq α)} :
computation.lift_rel equiv c1 c2 → flatten c1 ~ flatten c2 := lift_rel_flatten
theorem tail_congr {s t : wseq α} (h : s ~ t) : tail s ~ tail t :=
begin
apply flatten_congr,
unfold has_map.map, rw [←bind_ret, ←bind_ret],
apply lift_rel_bind _ _ (destruct_congr h),
intros a b h, simp,
cases a with a; cases b with b,
{ trivial },
{ cases h },
{ cases a, cases h },
{ cases a with a s', cases b with b t', exact h.right }
end
theorem dropn_congr {s t : wseq α} (h : s ~ t) (n) : drop s n ~ drop t n :=
by induction n; simp [*, tail_congr]
theorem nth_congr {s t : wseq α} (h : s ~ t) (n) : nth s n ~ nth t n :=
head_congr (dropn_congr h _)
theorem mem_congr {s t : wseq α} (h : s ~ t) (a) : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ t :=
suffices ∀ {s t : wseq α}, s ~ t → a ∈ s → a ∈ t, from ⟨this h, this h.symm⟩,
λ s t h as, let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nth_of_mem as in
nth_mem ((nth_congr h _ _).1 hn)
theorem productive_congr {s t : wseq α} (h : s ~ t) : productive s ↔ productive t :=
forall_congr $ λn, terminates_congr $ nth_congr h _
theorem equiv.ext {s t : wseq α} (h : ∀ n, nth s n ~ nth t n) : s ~ t :=
⟨λ s t, ∀ n, nth s n ~ nth t n, h, λs t h, begin
refine lift_rel_def.2 ⟨_, _⟩,
{ rw [←head_terminates_iff, ←head_terminates_iff],
exact terminates_congr (h 0) },
{ intros a b ma mb,
cases a with a; cases b with b,
{ trivial },
{ injection mem_unique (mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (mem_map _ mb)) },
{ injection mem_unique (mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (mem_map _ mb)) },
{ cases a with a s', cases b with b t',
injection mem_unique (mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (mem_map _ mb)) with ab,
refine ⟨ab, λ n, _⟩,
refine (nth_congr (flatten_equiv (mem_map _ ma)) n).symm.trans
((_ : nth (tail s) n ~ nth (tail t) n).trans
(nth_congr (flatten_equiv (mem_map _ mb)) n)),
rw [nth_tail, nth_tail], apply h } }
end⟩
theorem length_eq_map (s : wseq α) : length s = computation.map list.length (to_list s) :=
begin
refine eq_of_bisim
(λ c1 c2, ∃ (l : list α) (s : wseq α),
c1 = corec length._match_2 (l.length, s) ∧
c2 = computation.map list.length (corec to_list._match_2 (l, s)))
_ ⟨[], s, rfl, rfl⟩,
intros s1 s2 h, cases h with l h, cases h with s h, rw [h.left, h.right],
apply s.cases_on _ (λ a s, _) (λ s, _);
repeat {simp [to_list, nil, cons, think, length]},
{ refine ⟨a::l, s, _, _⟩; simp },
{ refine ⟨l, s, _, _⟩; simp }
end
@[simp] def of_list_nil : of_list [] = (nil : wseq α) := rfl
@[simp] def of_list_cons (a : α) (l) :
of_list (a :: l) = cons a (of_list l) :=
show seq.map some (seq.of_list (a :: l)) =
seq.cons (some a) (seq.map some (seq.of_list l)), by simp
@[simp] def to_list'_nil (l : list α) :
corec to_list._match_2 (l, nil) = return l.reverse :=
destruct_eq_ret rfl
@[simp] def to_list'_cons (l : list α) (s : wseq α) (a : α) :
corec to_list._match_2 (l, cons a s) =
(corec to_list._match_2 (a::l, s)).think :=
destruct_eq_think $ by simp [to_list, cons]
@[simp] def to_list'_think (l : list α) (s : wseq α) :
corec to_list._match_2 (l, think s) =
(corec to_list._match_2 (l, s)).think :=
destruct_eq_think $ by simp [to_list, think]
def to_list'_map (l : list α) (s : wseq α) :
corec to_list._match_2 (l, s) =
((++) l.reverse) <$> to_list s :=
begin
refine eq_of_bisim
(λ c1 c2, ∃ (l' : list α) (s : wseq α),
c1 = corec to_list._match_2 (l' ++ l, s) ∧
c2 = computation.map ((++) l.reverse) (corec to_list._match_2 (l', s)))
_ ⟨[], s, rfl, rfl⟩,
intros s1 s2 h, cases h with l' h, cases h with s h, rw [h.left, h.right],
apply s.cases_on _ (λ a s, _) (λ s, _);
repeat {simp [to_list, nil, cons, think, length]},
{ refine ⟨a::l', s, _, _⟩; simp },
{ refine ⟨l', s, _, _⟩; simp }
end
@[simp] def to_list_cons (a : α) (s) :
to_list (cons a s) = (list.cons a <$> to_list s).think :=
destruct_eq_think $ by unfold to_list; simp; rw to_list'_map; simp; refl
@[simp] def to_list_nil : to_list (nil : wseq α) = return [] :=
destruct_eq_ret rfl
theorem to_list_of_list (l : list α) : l ∈ to_list (of_list l) :=
by induction l with a l IH; simp [ret_mem]; exact think_mem (mem_map _ IH)
@[simp] theorem destruct_of_seq (s : seq α) :
destruct (of_seq s) = return (s.head.map $ λ a, (a, of_seq s.tail)) :=
destruct_eq_ret $ begin
simp [of_seq, head, destruct, seq.destruct, seq.head],
rw [show seq.nth (some <$> s) 0 = some <$> seq.nth s 0, by apply seq.map_nth],
cases seq.nth s 0 with a, { refl },
unfold has_map.map,
simp [option.map, option.bind, destruct]
end
@[simp] theorem head_of_seq (s : seq α) : head (of_seq s) = return s.head :=
by simp [head]; cases seq.head s; refl
@[simp] theorem tail_of_seq (s : seq α) : tail (of_seq s) = of_seq s.tail :=
begin
simp [tail], apply s.cases_on _ (λ x s, _); simp [of_seq], {refl},
rw [seq.head_cons, seq.tail_cons], refl
end
@[simp] theorem dropn_of_seq (s : seq α) : ∀ n, drop (of_seq s) n = of_seq (s.drop n)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by dsimp [drop]; rw [dropn_of_seq, tail_of_seq]
theorem nth_of_seq (s : seq α) (n) : nth (of_seq s) n = return (seq.nth s n) :=
by dsimp [nth]; rw [dropn_of_seq, head_of_seq, seq.head_dropn]
instance productive_of_seq (s : seq α) : productive (of_seq s) :=
λ n, by rw nth_of_seq; apply_instance
theorem to_seq_of_seq (s : seq α) : to_seq (of_seq s) = s :=
begin
apply subtype.eq, apply funext, intro n,
dsimp [to_seq], apply get_eq_of_mem,
rw nth_of_seq, apply ret_mem
end
def ret (a : α) : wseq α := of_list [a]
@[simp] theorem map_nil (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_cons (f : α → β) (a s) :
map f (cons a s) = cons (f a) (map f s) := seq.map_cons _ _ _
@[simp] theorem map_think (f : α → β) (s) :
map f (think s) = think (map f s) := seq.map_cons _ _ _
@[simp] theorem map_id (s : wseq α) : map id s = s := by simp [map]
@[simp] theorem map_ret (f : α → β) (a) : map f (ret a) = ret (f a) := by simp [ret]
@[simp] theorem map_append (f : α → β) (s t) : map f (append s t) = append (map f s) (map f t) :=
seq.map_append _ _ _
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (s : wseq α) :
map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s) :=
begin
dsimp [map], rw ←seq.map_comp,
apply congr_fun, apply congr_arg,
apply funext, intro o, cases o; refl
end
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {a : α} {s : wseq α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s :=
seq.mem_map (option.map f)
-- The converse is not true without additional assumptions
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {S : wseq (wseq α)}, a ∈ join S → ∃ s, s ∈ S ∧ a ∈ s :=
suffices ∀ ss : wseq α, a ∈ ss → ∀ s S, append s (join S) = ss →
a ∈ append s (join S) → a ∈ s ∨ ∃ s, s ∈ S ∧ a ∈ s, from λ S h,
(this _ h nil S (by simp) (by simp [h])).resolve_left (not_mem_nil _),
begin
intros ss h, apply mem_rec_on h (λ b ss o, _) (λ ss IH, _); intros s S,
{ refine s.cases_on (S.cases_on _ (λ s S, _) (λ S, _)) (λ b' s, _) (λ s, _);
intros ej m; simp at ej;
have := congr_arg seq.destruct ej; simp at this;
try {cases this}; try {contradiction},
substs b' ss,
simp at m ⊢,
cases o with e IH, { simp [e] },
apply or.imp_right (λ m, _) m,
simp at IH, apply IH _ _ rfl m },
{ refine s.cases_on (S.cases_on _ (λ s S, _) (λ S, _)) (λ b' s, _) (λ s, _);
intros ej m; simp at ej;
have := congr_arg seq.destruct ej; simp at this;
try { try {have := this.1}, contradiction }; subst ss,
{ apply or.inr, simp at m ⊢,
cases IH s S rfl m with as ex,
{ exact ⟨s, as, or.inl rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ex with ⟨s', sS, as⟩,
exact ⟨s', as, or.inr sS⟩ } },
{ apply or.inr, simp at m,
rcases (IH nil S (by simp) (by simp [m])).resolve_left (not_mem_nil _) with ⟨s, sS, as⟩,
exact ⟨s, by simp [sS], as⟩ },
{ simp at m IH ⊢, apply IH _ _ rfl m } }
end
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {s : wseq α} {f : α → wseq β} {b}
(h : b ∈ bind s f) : ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
let ⟨t, tm, bt⟩ := exists_of_mem_join h,
⟨a, as, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map tm in ⟨a, as, by rwa e⟩
theorem destruct_map (f : α → β) (s : wseq α) :
destruct (map f s) = computation.map (option.map (prod.map f (map f))) (destruct s) :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λ c1 c2, ∃ s, c1 = destruct (map f s) ∧
c2 = computation.map (option.map (prod.map f (map f))) (destruct s)),
{ intros c1 c2 h, cases h with s h, rw [h.left, h.right],
apply s.cases_on _ (λ a s, _) (λ s, _); simp; simp,
{ refl }, { refl }, { exact ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ } },
{ exact ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem lift_rel_map {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop)
{s1 : wseq α} {s2 : wseq β}
{f1 : α → γ} {f2 : β → δ}
(h1 : lift_rel R s1 s2) (h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S (f1 a) (f2 b))
: lift_rel S (map f1 s1) (map f2 s2) :=
⟨λ s1 s2, ∃ s t, s1 = map f1 s ∧ s2 = map f2 t ∧ lift_rel R s t,
⟨s1, s2, rfl, rfl, h1⟩,
λ s1 s2 h, match s1, s2, h with ._, ._, ⟨s, t, rfl, rfl, h⟩ := begin
simp [destruct_map], apply computation.lift_rel_map _ _ (lift_rel_destruct h),
intros o p h,
cases o with a; cases p with b; simp [option.map, option.bind],
{ cases b; cases h },
{ cases a; cases h },
{ cases a with a s; cases b with b t, cases h with r h,
exact ⟨h2 r, s, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end end⟩
theorem map_congr (f : α → β) {s t : wseq α} (h : s ~ t) : map f s ~ map f t :=
lift_rel_map _ _ h (λ _ _, congr_arg _)
def destruct_append.aux (t : wseq α) :
option (α × wseq α) → computation (option (α × wseq α))
| none := destruct t
| (some (a, s)) := return (some (a, append s t))
attribute [simp] destruct_append.aux
theorem destruct_append (s t : wseq α) :
destruct (append s t) = (destruct s).bind (destruct_append.aux t) :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λ c1 c2, ∃ s t, c1 = destruct (append s t) ∧
c2 = (destruct s).bind (destruct_append.aux t)) _ ⟨s, t, rfl, rfl⟩,
intros c1 c2 h, cases h with s h, cases h with t h, rw [h.left, h.right],
apply s.cases_on _ (λ a s, _) (λ s, _); simp; simp,
{ apply t.cases_on _ (λ b t, _) (λ t, _); simp; simp,
{ refine ⟨nil, t, _, _⟩; simp } },
{ exact ⟨s, t, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end
def destruct_join.aux : option (wseq α × wseq (wseq α)) → computation (option (α × wseq α))
| none := return none
| (some (s, S)) := (destruct (append s (join S))).think
attribute [simp] destruct_join.aux
theorem destruct_join (S : wseq (wseq α)) :
destruct (join S) = (destruct S).bind destruct_join.aux :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λ c1 c2, c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ S, c1 = destruct (join S) ∧
c2 = (destruct S).bind destruct_join.aux) _ (or.inr ⟨S, rfl, rfl⟩),
intros c1 c2 h, exact match c1, c2, h with
| _, _, (or.inl $ eq.refl c) := by cases c.destruct; simp
| _, _, or.inr ⟨S, rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
apply S.cases_on _ (λ s S, _) (λ S, _); simp; simp,
{ refine or.inr ⟨S, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end end
end
theorem lift_rel_append (R : α → β → Prop) {s1 s2 : wseq α} {t1 t2 : wseq β}
(h1 : lift_rel R s1 t1) (h2 : lift_rel R s2 t2) :
lift_rel R (append s1 s2) (append t1 t2) :=
⟨λ s t, lift_rel R s t ∨ ∃ s1 t1, s = append s1 s2 ∧ t = append t1 t2 ∧ lift_rel R s1 t1,
or.inr ⟨s1, t1, rfl, rfl, h1⟩,
λ s t h, match s, t, h with
| s, t, or.inl h := begin
apply computation.lift_rel.imp _ _ _ (lift_rel_destruct h),
intros a b, apply lift_rel_o.imp_right,
intros s t, apply or.inl
end
| ._, ._, or.inr ⟨s1, t1, rfl, rfl, h⟩ := begin
simp [destruct_append],
apply computation.lift_rel_bind _ _ (lift_rel_destruct h),
intros o p h,
cases o with a; cases p with b,
{ simp, apply computation.lift_rel.imp _ _ _ (lift_rel_destruct h2),
intros a b, apply lift_rel_o.imp_right,
intros s t, apply or.inl },
{ cases b; cases h },
{ cases a; cases h },
{ cases a with a s; cases b with b t, cases h with r h,
simp, exact ⟨r, or.inr ⟨s, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ }
end
end⟩
theorem lift_rel_join.lem (R : α → β → Prop) {S T} {U : wseq α → wseq β → Prop}
(ST : lift_rel (lift_rel R) S T) (HU : ∀ s1 s2, (∃ s t S T,
s1 = append s (join S) ∧ s2 = append t (join T) ∧
lift_rel R s t ∧ lift_rel (lift_rel R) S T) → U s1 s2) {a} (ma : a ∈ destruct (join S)) :
∃ {b}, b ∈ destruct (join T) ∧ lift_rel_o R U a b :=
begin
cases exists_results_of_mem ma with n h, clear ma, revert a S T,
apply nat.strong_induction_on n _,
intros n IH a S T ST ra, simp [destruct_join] at ra, exact
let ⟨o, m, k, rs1, rs2, en⟩ := of_results_bind ra,
⟨p, mT, rop⟩ := computation.exists_of_lift_rel_left (lift_rel_destruct ST) rs1.mem in
by exact match o, p, rop, rs1, rs2, mT with
| none, none, _, rs1, rs2, mT := by simp [destruct_join]; exact
⟨none, by rw eq_of_ret_mem rs2.mem; trivial, mem_bind mT (ret_mem _)⟩
| some (s, S'), some (t, T'), ⟨st, ST'⟩, rs1, rs2, mT :=
by simp [destruct_append] at rs2; exact
let ⟨k1, rs3, ek⟩ := of_results_think rs2,
⟨o', m1, n1, rs4, rs5, ek1⟩ := of_results_bind rs3,
⟨p', mt, rop'⟩ := computation.exists_of_lift_rel_left (lift_rel_destruct st) rs4.mem in
by exact match o', p', rop', rs4, rs5, mt with
| none, none, _, rs4, rs5', mt :=
have n1 < n, begin
rw [en, ek, ek1],
apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ (nat.le_add_right _ _),
apply nat.lt_succ_of_le (nat.le_add_right _ _)
end,
let ⟨ob, mb, rob⟩ := IH _ this ST' rs5' in by refine ⟨ob, _, rob⟩;
{ simp [destruct_join], apply mem_bind mT, simp [destruct_append],
apply think_mem, apply mem_bind mt, exact mb }
| some (a, s'), some (b, t'), ⟨ab, st'⟩, rs4, rs5, mt := begin
simp at rs5,
refine ⟨some (b, append t' (join T')), _, _⟩,
{ simp [destruct_join], apply mem_bind mT, simp [destruct_append],
apply think_mem, apply mem_bind mt, apply ret_mem },
rw eq_of_ret_mem rs5.mem,
exact ⟨ab, HU _ _ ⟨s', t', S', T', rfl, rfl, st', ST'⟩⟩
end end
end
end
theorem lift_rel_join (R : α → β → Prop) {S : wseq (wseq α)} {T : wseq (wseq β)}
(h : lift_rel (lift_rel R) S T) : lift_rel R (join S) (join T) :=
⟨λ s1 s2, ∃ s t S T,
s1 = append s (join S) ∧ s2 = append t (join T) ∧
lift_rel R s t ∧ lift_rel (lift_rel R) S T,
⟨nil, nil, S, T, by simp, by simp, by simp, h⟩,
λs1 s2 ⟨s, t, S, T, h1, h2, st, ST⟩, begin
clear _fun_match _x,
rw [h1, h2], rw [destruct_append, destruct_append],
apply computation.lift_rel_bind _ _ (lift_rel_destruct st),
exact λ o p h, match o, p, h with
| some (a, s), some (b, t), ⟨h1, h2⟩ :=
by simp; exact ⟨h1, s, t, h2, S, rfl, T, ST, rfl⟩
| none, none, _ := begin
dsimp [destruct_append.aux, computation.lift_rel], constructor,
{ intro, apply lift_rel_join.lem _ ST (λ _ _, id) },
{ intros b mb,
rw [←lift_rel_o.swap], apply lift_rel_join.lem (function.swap R),
{ rw [←lift_rel.swap R, ←lift_rel.swap], apply ST },
{ rw [←lift_rel.swap R, ←lift_rel.swap (lift_rel R)],
exact λ s1 s2 ⟨s, t, S, T, h1, h2, st, ST⟩,
⟨t, s, T, S, h2, h1, st, ST⟩ },
{ exact mb } }
end end
end⟩
theorem join_congr {S T : wseq (wseq α)} (h : lift_rel equiv S T) : join S ~ join T :=
lift_rel_join _ h
theorem lift_rel_bind {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop)
{s1 : wseq α} {s2 : wseq β}
{f1 : α → wseq γ} {f2 : β → wseq δ}
(h1 : lift_rel R s1 s2) (h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → lift_rel S (f1 a) (f2 b))
: lift_rel S (bind s1 f1) (bind s2 f2) :=
lift_rel_join _ (lift_rel_map _ _ h1 @h2)
theorem bind_congr {s1 s2 : wseq α} {f1 f2 : α → wseq β}
(h1 : s1 ~ s2) (h2 : ∀ a, f1 a ~ f2 a) : bind s1 f1 ~ bind s2 f2 :=
lift_rel_bind _ _ h1 (λ a b h, by rw h; apply h2)
@[simp] theorem join_ret (s : wseq α) : join (ret s) ~ s :=
by simp [ret]; apply think_equiv
@[simp] theorem join_map_ret (s : wseq α) : join (map ret s) ~ s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ s1 s2, join (map ret s2) = s1, rfl, _⟩,
intros s' s h, rw ←h,
apply lift_rel_rec
(λ c1 c2, ∃ s,
c1 = destruct (join (map ret s)) ∧ c2 = destruct s),
{ exact λ c1 c2 h, match c1, c2, h with
| ._, ._, ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
clear h _match,
apply s.cases_on _ (λ a s, _) (λ s, _); simp [ret]; simp [ret],
{ refine ⟨_, _, ret_mem _⟩, simp },
{ exact ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end end },
{ exact ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end
@[simp] theorem join_append (S T : wseq (wseq α)) :
join (append S T) ~ append (join S) (join T) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ s1 s2, ∃ s S T,
s1 = append s (join (append S T)) ∧
s2 = append s (append (join S) (join T)), ⟨nil, S, T, by simp, by simp⟩, _⟩,
intros s1 s2 h,
apply lift_rel_rec (λ c1 c2, ∃ (s : wseq α) S T,
c1 = destruct (append s (join (append S T))) ∧
c2 = destruct (append s (append (join S) (join T)))) _ _ _
(let ⟨s, S, T, h1, h2⟩ := h in
⟨s, S, T, congr_arg destruct h1, congr_arg destruct h2⟩),
intros c1 c2 h,
exact match c1, c2, h with ._, ._, ⟨s, S, T, rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
clear _match h h,
apply wseq.cases_on s _ (λ a s, _) (λ s, _); simp; simp,
{ apply wseq.cases_on S _ (λ s S, _) (λ S, _); simp; simp,
{ apply wseq.cases_on T _ (λ s T, _) (λ T, _); simp; simp,
{ refine ⟨s, nil, T, _, _⟩; simp },
{ refine ⟨nil, nil, T, _, _⟩; simp } },
{ exact ⟨s, S, T, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ refine ⟨nil, S, T, _, _⟩; simp } },
{ exact ⟨s, S, T, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ exact ⟨s, S, T, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end end
end
@[simp] theorem bind_ret (f : α → β) (s) : bind s (ret ∘ f) ~ map f s :=
begin
dsimp [bind], change (λx, ret (f x)) with (ret ∘ f),
rw [map_comp], apply join_map_ret
end
@[simp] theorem ret_bind (a : α) (f : α → wseq β) :
bind (ret a) f ~ f a := by simp [bind]
@[simp] theorem map_join (f : α → β) (S) :
map f (join S) = join (map (map f) S) :=
begin
apply seq.eq_of_bisim (λs1 s2,
∃ s S, s1 = append s (map f (join S)) ∧
s2 = append s (join (map (map f) S))),
{ intros s1 s2 h,
exact match s1, s2, h with ._, ._, ⟨s, S, rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
apply wseq.cases_on s _ (λ a s, _) (λ s, _); simp; simp,
{ apply wseq.cases_on S _ (λ s S, _) (λ S, _); simp; simp,
{ exact ⟨map f s, S, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ refine ⟨nil, S, _, _⟩; simp } },
{ exact ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ exact ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end end },
{ refine ⟨nil, S, _, _⟩; simp }
end
@[simp] theorem join_join (SS : wseq (wseq (wseq α))) :
join (join SS) ~ join (map join SS) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ s1 s2, ∃ s S SS,
s1 = append s (join (append S (join SS))) ∧
s2 = append s (append (join S) (join (map join SS))),
⟨nil, nil, SS, by simp, by simp⟩, _⟩,
intros s1 s2 h,
apply lift_rel_rec (λ c1 c2, ∃ s S SS,
c1 = destruct (append s (join (append S (join SS)))) ∧
c2 = destruct (append s (append (join S) (join (map join SS)))))
_ (destruct s1) (destruct s2)
(let ⟨s, S, SS, h1, h2⟩ := h in ⟨s, S, SS, by simp [h1], by simp [h2]⟩),
intros c1 c2 h,
exact match c1, c2, h with ._, ._, ⟨s, S, SS, rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
clear _match h h,
apply wseq.cases_on s _ (λ a s, _) (λ s, _); simp; simp,
{ apply wseq.cases_on S _ (λ s S, _) (λ S, _); simp; simp,
{ apply wseq.cases_on SS _ (λ S SS, _) (λ SS, _); simp; simp,
{ refine ⟨nil, S, SS, _, _⟩; simp },
{ refine ⟨nil, nil, SS, _, _⟩; simp } },
{ exact ⟨s, S, SS, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ refine ⟨nil, S, SS, _, _⟩; simp } },
{ exact ⟨s, S, SS, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ exact ⟨s, S, SS, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end end
end
@[simp] theorem bind_assoc (s : wseq α) (f : α → wseq β) (g : β → wseq γ) :
bind (bind s f) g ~ bind s (λ (x : α), bind (f x) g) :=
begin
simp [bind], rw [←map_comp f (map g), map_comp (map g ∘ f) join],
apply join_join
end
/-
Unfortunately, wseq is not a monad, because it does not satisfy
the monad laws exactly, only up to sequence equivalence.
Furthermore, even quotienting by the equivalence is not sufficient,
because the join operation involves lists of quotient elements,
with a lifted equivalence relation, and pure quotients cannot handle
this type of construction.
instance : monad wseq :=
{ map := @map,
pure := @ret,
bind := @bind,
id_map := @map_id,
bind_pure_comp_eq_map := @bind_ret,
pure_bind := @ret_bind,
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc }
-/
end wseq
|
196f3d50d49658367a7810f0b69c0d0492e623cb | f20db13587f4dd28a4b1fbd31953afd491691fa0 | /library/init/meta/vm.lean | 687447e984e4f7fa76b7be4325eec9b6a04bf473 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AHartNtkn/lean | 9a971edfc6857c63edcbf96bea6841b9a84cf916 | 0d83a74b26541421fc1aa33044c35b03759710ed | refs/heads/master | 1,620,592,591,236 | 1,516,749,881,000 | 1,516,749,881,000 | 118,697,288 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,516,759,470,000 | 1,516,759,470,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,482 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.meta.tactic init.data.option_t
import init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance
meta constant vm_obj : Type
@[derive decidable_eq]
inductive vm_obj_kind
| simple | constructor | closure | native_closure | mpz
| name | level | expr | declaration
| environment | tactic_state | format
| options | other
namespace vm_obj
meta constant kind : vm_obj → vm_obj_kind
/-- For simple and constructor vm_obj's, it returns the constructor tag/index.
Return 0 otherwise. -/
meta constant cidx : vm_obj → nat
/-- For closure vm_obj's, it returns the internal function index. -/
meta constant fn_idx : vm_obj → nat
/-- For constructor vm_obj's, it returns the data stored in the object.
For closure vm_obj's, it returns the local arguments captured by the closure. -/
meta constant fields : vm_obj → list vm_obj
/-- For simple and mpz vm_obj's -/
meta constant to_nat : vm_obj → nat
/-- For name vm_obj's, it returns the name wrapped by the vm_obj. -/
meta constant to_name : vm_obj → name
/-- For level vm_obj's, it returns the universe level wrapped by the vm_obj. -/
meta constant to_level : vm_obj → level
/-- For expr vm_obj's, it returns the expression wrapped by the vm_obj. -/
meta constant to_expr : vm_obj → expr
/-- For declaration vm_obj's, it returns the declaration wrapped by the vm_obj. -/
meta constant to_declaration : vm_obj → declaration
/-- For environment vm_obj's, it returns the environment wrapped by the vm_obj. -/
meta constant to_environment : vm_obj → environment
/-- For tactic_state vm_obj's, it returns the tactic_state object wrapped by the vm_obj. -/
meta constant to_tactic_state : vm_obj → tactic_state
/-- For format vm_obj's, it returns the format object wrapped by the vm_obj. -/
meta constant to_format : vm_obj → format
end vm_obj
meta constant vm_decl : Type
inductive vm_decl_kind
| bytecode | builtin | cfun
/-- Information for local variables and arguments on the VM stack.
Remark: type is only available if it is a closed term at compilation time. -/
meta structure vm_local_info :=
(id : name) (type : option expr)
namespace vm_decl
meta constant kind : vm_decl → vm_decl_kind
meta constant to_name : vm_decl → name
/-- Internal function index associated with the given VM declaration. -/
meta constant idx : vm_decl → nat
/-- Number of arguments needed to execute the given VM declaration. -/
meta constant arity : vm_decl → nat
/-- Return source position if available -/
meta constant pos : vm_decl → option pos
/-- Return .olean file where the given VM declaration was imported from. -/
meta constant olean : vm_decl → option string
/-- Return names .olean file where the given VM declaration was imported from. -/
meta constant args_info : vm_decl → list vm_local_info
end vm_decl
meta constant vm_core : Type → Type
meta constant vm_core.map {α β : Type} : (α → β) → vm_core α → vm_core β
meta constant vm_core.ret {α : Type} : α → vm_core α
meta constant vm_core.bind {α β : Type} : vm_core α → (α → vm_core β) → vm_core β
meta instance : monad vm_core :=
{map := @vm_core.map, pure := @vm_core.ret, bind := @vm_core.bind,
id_map := undefined, pure_bind := undefined, bind_assoc := undefined,
bind_pure_comp_eq_map := undefined, bind_map_eq_seq := undefined}
@[reducible] meta def vm (α : Type) : Type := option_t vm_core α
namespace vm
meta constant get_env : vm environment
meta constant get_decl : name → vm vm_decl
meta constant get_options : vm options
meta constant stack_size : vm nat
/-- Return the vm_obj stored at the given position on the execution stack.
It fails if position >= vm.stack_size -/
meta constant stack_obj : nat → vm vm_obj
/-- Return (name, type) for the object at the given position on the execution stack.
It fails if position >= vm.stack_size.
The name is anonymous if vm_obj is a transient value created by the compiler.
Type information is only recorded if the type is a closed term at compilation time. -/
meta constant stack_obj_info : nat → vm (name × option expr)
/-- Pretty print the vm_obj at the given position on the execution stack. -/
meta constant pp_stack_obj : nat → vm format
/-- Pretty print the given expression. -/
meta constant pp_expr : expr → vm format
/-- Number of frames on the call stack. -/
meta constant call_stack_size : vm nat
/-- Return the function name at the given stack frame.
Action fails if position >= vm.call_stack_size. -/
meta constant call_stack_fn : nat → vm name
/-- Return the range [start, end) for the given stack frame.
Action fails if position >= vm.call_stack_size.
The values start and end correspond to positions at the execution stack.
We have that 0 <= start < end <= vm.stack_size -/
meta constant call_stack_var_range : nat → vm (nat × nat)
/-- Return the name of the function on top of the call stack. -/
meta constant curr_fn : vm name
/-- Return the base stack pointer for the frame on top of the call stack. -/
meta constant bp : vm nat
/-- Return the program counter. -/
meta constant pc : vm nat
/-- Convert the given vm_obj into a string -/
meta constant obj_to_string : vm_obj → vm string
meta constant put_str : string → vm unit
meta constant get_line : vm string
/-- Return tt if end of the input stream has been reached.
For example, this can happen if the user presses Ctrl-D -/
meta constant eof : vm bool
/-- Return the list of declarations tagged with the given attribute. -/
meta constant get_attribute : name → vm (list name)
meta def trace {α : Type} [has_to_format α] (a : α) : vm unit :=
do fmt ← return $ to_fmt a,
return $ _root_.trace_fmt fmt (λ u, ())
end vm
/-- A Lean VM monitor. Monitors are registered using the [vm_monitor] attribute.
If option 'debugger' is true, then the VM will initialize the vm_monitor state using the
'init' field, and will invoke the function 'step' before each instruction is invoked. -/
meta structure vm_monitor (α : Type) :=
(init : α) (step : α → vm α)
|
8e2493dd52891bde95d23fc8498e81f794b0f1f3 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/run/simp_if_true_false.lean | fba9dd22bd785324c49313cbca4df4909dac4c35 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 112 | lean | example (m n p : ℕ) : ite (m = m) n p = n := by simp
example (m n p : ℕ) : ite (m ≠ m) n p = p := by simp
|
db6bed8cbc93bcb788a8ed3d62f086ac7b5d6c82 | 626e312b5c1cb2d88fca108f5933076012633192 | /src/algebra/add_torsor.lean | 29f7877f72a9ca8099aaac7574a5e5390eafd4c3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Bioye97/mathlib | 9db2f9ee54418d29dd06996279ba9dc874fd6beb | 782a20a27ee83b523f801ff34efb1a9557085019 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,305,956,488 | 1,631,067,774,000 | 1,631,067,774,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,311 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.group.prod
import algebra.group.type_tags
import algebra.group.pi
import algebra.pointwise
import data.equiv.basic
import data.set.finite
/-!
# Torsors of additive group actions
This file defines torsors of additive group actions.
## Notations
The group elements are referred to as acting on points. This file
defines the notation `+ᵥ` for adding a group element to a point and
`-ᵥ` for subtracting two points to produce a group element.
## Implementation notes
Affine spaces are the motivating example of torsors of additive group actions. It may be appropriate
to refactor in terms of the general definition of group actions, via `to_additive`, when there is a
use for multiplicative torsors (currently mathlib only develops the theory of group actions for
multiplicative group actions).
## Notations
* `v +ᵥ p` is a notation for `has_vadd.vadd`, the left action of an additive monoid;
* `p₁ -ᵥ p₂` is a notation for `has_vsub.vsub`, difference between two points in an additive torsor
as an element of the corresponding additive group;
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
/-- Type class for the `-ᵥ` notation. -/
class has_vsub (G : out_param Type*) (P : Type*) :=
(vsub : P → P → G)
infix ` -ᵥ `:65 := has_vsub.vsub
/-- An `add_torsor G P` gives a structure to the nonempty type `P`,
acted on by an `add_group G` with a transitive and free action given
by the `+ᵥ` operation and a corresponding subtraction given by the
`-ᵥ` operation. In the case of a vector space, it is an affine
space. -/
class add_torsor (G : out_param Type*) (P : Type*) [out_param $ add_group G]
extends add_action G P, has_vsub G P :=
[nonempty : nonempty P]
(vsub_vadd' : ∀ (p1 p2 : P), (p1 -ᵥ p2 : G) +ᵥ p2 = p1)
(vadd_vsub' : ∀ (g : G) (p : P), g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g)
attribute [instance, priority 100, nolint dangerous_instance] add_torsor.nonempty
attribute [nolint dangerous_instance] add_torsor.to_has_vsub
/-- An `add_group G` is a torsor for itself. -/
@[nolint instance_priority]
instance add_group_is_add_torsor (G : Type*) [add_group G] :
add_torsor G G :=
{ vsub := has_sub.sub,
vsub_vadd' := sub_add_cancel,
vadd_vsub' := add_sub_cancel }
/-- Simplify subtraction for a torsor for an `add_group G` over
itself. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_eq_sub {G : Type*} [add_group G] (g1 g2 : G) : g1 -ᵥ g2 = g1 - g2 :=
rfl
section general
variables {G : Type*} {P : Type*} [add_group G] [T : add_torsor G P]
include T
/-- Adding the result of subtracting from another point produces that
point. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_vadd (p1 p2 : P) : p1 -ᵥ p2 +ᵥ p2 = p1 :=
add_torsor.vsub_vadd' p1 p2
/-- Adding a group element then subtracting the original point
produces that group element. -/
@[simp] lemma vadd_vsub (g : G) (p : P) : g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g :=
add_torsor.vadd_vsub' g p
/-- If the same point added to two group elements produces equal
results, those group elements are equal. -/
lemma vadd_right_cancel {g1 g2 : G} (p : P) (h : g1 +ᵥ p = g2 +ᵥ p) : g1 = g2 :=
by rw [←vadd_vsub g1, h, vadd_vsub]
@[simp] lemma vadd_right_cancel_iff {g1 g2 : G} (p : P) : g1 +ᵥ p = g2 +ᵥ p ↔ g1 = g2 :=
⟨vadd_right_cancel p, λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
/-- Adding a group element to the point `p` is an injective
function. -/
lemma vadd_right_injective (p : P) : function.injective ((+ᵥ p) : G → P) :=
λ g1 g2, vadd_right_cancel p
/-- Adding a group element to a point, then subtracting another point,
produces the same result as subtracting the points then adding the
group element. -/
lemma vadd_vsub_assoc (g : G) (p1 p2 : P) : g +ᵥ p1 -ᵥ p2 = g + (p1 -ᵥ p2) :=
begin
apply vadd_right_cancel p2,
rw [vsub_vadd, add_vadd, vsub_vadd]
end
/-- Subtracting a point from itself produces 0. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_self (p : P) : p -ᵥ p = (0 : G) :=
by rw [←zero_add (p -ᵥ p), ←vadd_vsub_assoc, vadd_vsub]
/-- If subtracting two points produces 0, they are equal. -/
lemma eq_of_vsub_eq_zero {p1 p2 : P} (h : p1 -ᵥ p2 = (0 : G)) : p1 = p2 :=
by rw [←vsub_vadd p1 p2, h, zero_vadd]
/-- Subtracting two points produces 0 if and only if they are
equal. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq {p1 p2 : P} : p1 -ᵥ p2 = (0 : G) ↔ p1 = p2 :=
iff.intro eq_of_vsub_eq_zero (λ h, h ▸ vsub_self _)
/-- Cancellation adding the results of two subtractions. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_add_vsub_cancel (p1 p2 p3 : P) : p1 -ᵥ p2 + (p2 -ᵥ p3) = (p1 -ᵥ p3) :=
begin
apply vadd_right_cancel p3,
rw [add_vadd, vsub_vadd, vsub_vadd, vsub_vadd]
end
/-- Subtracting two points in the reverse order produces the negation
of subtracting them. -/
@[simp] lemma neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev (p1 p2 : P) : -(p1 -ᵥ p2) = (p2 -ᵥ p1) :=
begin
refine neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero (vadd_right_cancel p1 _),
rw [vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self],
end
/-- Subtracting the result of adding a group element produces the same result
as subtracting the points and subtracting that group element. -/
lemma vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub (p1 p2 : P) (g : G) : p1 -ᵥ (g +ᵥ p2) = (p1 -ᵥ p2) - g :=
by rw [←add_right_inj (p2 -ᵥ p1 : G), vsub_add_vsub_cancel, ←neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, vadd_vsub,
←add_sub_assoc, ←neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_add_self, zero_sub]
/-- Cancellation subtracting the results of two subtractions. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right (p1 p2 p3 : P) :
(p1 -ᵥ p3) - (p2 -ᵥ p3) = (p1 -ᵥ p2) :=
by rw [←vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd]
/-- Convert between an equality with adding a group element to a point
and an equality of a subtraction of two points with a group
element. -/
lemma eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq (p1 : P) (g : G) (p2 : P) : p1 = g +ᵥ p2 ↔ p1 -ᵥ p2 = g :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ vadd_vsub _ _, λ h, h ▸ (vsub_vadd _ _).symm⟩
lemma vadd_eq_vadd_iff_neg_add_eq_vsub {v₁ v₂ : G} {p₁ p₂ : P} :
v₁ +ᵥ p₁ = v₂ +ᵥ p₂ ↔ - v₁ + v₂ = p₁ -ᵥ p₂ :=
by rw [eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq, vadd_vsub_assoc, ← add_right_inj (-v₁), neg_add_cancel_left, eq_comm]
namespace set
instance has_vsub : has_vsub (set G) (set P) := ⟨set.image2 (-ᵥ)⟩
section vsub
variables (s t : set P)
@[simp] lemma vsub_empty : s -ᵥ ∅ = ∅ := set.image2_empty_right
@[simp] lemma empty_vsub : ∅ -ᵥ s = ∅ := set.image2_empty_left
@[simp] lemma singleton_vsub (p : P) : {p} -ᵥ s = ((-ᵥ) p) '' s :=
image2_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma vsub_singleton (p : P) : s -ᵥ {p} = (-ᵥ p) '' s :=
image2_singleton_right
@[simp] lemma singleton_vsub_self (p : P) : ({p} : set P) -ᵥ {p} = {(0:G)} :=
by simp
variables {s t}
/-- `vsub` of a finite set is finite. -/
lemma finite.vsub (hs : finite s) (ht : finite t) : finite (s -ᵥ t) :=
hs.image2 _ ht
/-- Each pairwise difference is in the `vsub` set. -/
lemma vsub_mem_vsub {ps pt : P} (hs : ps ∈ s) (ht : pt ∈ t) :
(ps -ᵥ pt) ∈ s -ᵥ t :=
mem_image2_of_mem hs ht
/-- `s -ᵥ t` is monotone in both arguments. -/
@[mono] lemma vsub_subset_vsub {s' t' : set P} (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') :
s -ᵥ t ⊆ s' -ᵥ t' :=
image2_subset hs ht
lemma vsub_self_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : s -ᵥ s ⊆ t -ᵥ t := vsub_subset_vsub h h
lemma vsub_subset_iff {u : set G} : s -ᵥ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), x -ᵥ y ∈ u :=
image2_subset_iff
end vsub
open_locale pointwise
instance add_action : add_action (set G) (set P) :=
{ zero_vadd := λ s, by simp [has_vadd.vadd, ←singleton_zero, image2_singleton_left],
add_vadd := λ s t p, by { apply image2_assoc, intros, apply add_vadd },
..(show has_vadd (set G) (set P), by apply_instance) }
variables {s s' : set G} {t t' : set P}
@[mono] lemma vadd_subset_vadd (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : s +ᵥ t ⊆ s' +ᵥ t' :=
image2_subset hs ht
@[simp] lemma vadd_singleton (s : set G) (p : P) : s +ᵥ {p} = (+ᵥ p) '' s := image2_singleton_right
lemma finite.vadd (hs : finite s) (ht : finite t) : finite (s +ᵥ t) := hs.image2 _ ht
end set
@[simp] lemma vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right (v₁ v₂ : G) (p : P) :
(v₁ +ᵥ p) -ᵥ (v₂ +ᵥ p) = v₁ - v₂ :=
by rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self, add_zero]
/-- If the same point subtracted from two points produces equal
results, those points are equal. -/
lemma vsub_left_cancel {p1 p2 p : P} (h : p1 -ᵥ p = p2 -ᵥ p) : p1 = p2 :=
by rwa [←sub_eq_zero, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
/-- The same point subtracted from two points produces equal results
if and only if those points are equal. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_left_cancel_iff {p1 p2 p : P} : (p1 -ᵥ p) = p2 -ᵥ p ↔ p1 = p2 :=
⟨vsub_left_cancel, λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
/-- Subtracting the point `p` is an injective function. -/
lemma vsub_left_injective (p : P) : function.injective ((-ᵥ p) : P → G) :=
λ p2 p3, vsub_left_cancel
/-- If subtracting two points from the same point produces equal
results, those points are equal. -/
lemma vsub_right_cancel {p1 p2 p : P} (h : p -ᵥ p1 = p -ᵥ p2) : p1 = p2 :=
begin
refine vadd_left_cancel (p -ᵥ p2) _,
rw [vsub_vadd, ← h, vsub_vadd]
end
/-- Subtracting two points from the same point produces equal results
if and only if those points are equal. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_right_cancel_iff {p1 p2 p : P} : p -ᵥ p1 = p -ᵥ p2 ↔ p1 = p2 :=
⟨vsub_right_cancel, λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
/-- Subtracting a point from the point `p` is an injective
function. -/
lemma vsub_right_injective (p : P) : function.injective ((-ᵥ) p : P → G) :=
λ p2 p3, vsub_right_cancel
end general
section comm
variables {G : Type*} {P : Type*} [add_comm_group G] [add_torsor G P]
include G
/-- Cancellation subtracting the results of two subtractions. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left (p1 p2 p3 : P) :
(p3 -ᵥ p2) - (p3 -ᵥ p1) = (p1 -ᵥ p2) :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel]
@[simp] lemma vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left (v : G) (p1 p2 : P) :
(v +ᵥ p1) -ᵥ (v +ᵥ p2) = p1 -ᵥ p2 :=
by rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, add_sub_cancel']
lemma vsub_vadd_comm (p1 p2 p3 : P) : (p1 -ᵥ p2 : G) +ᵥ p3 = p3 -ᵥ p2 +ᵥ p1 :=
begin
rw [←@vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq G, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub],
simp
end
lemma vadd_eq_vadd_iff_sub_eq_vsub {v₁ v₂ : G} {p₁ p₂ : P} :
v₁ +ᵥ p₁ = v₂ +ᵥ p₂ ↔ v₂ - v₁ = p₁ -ᵥ p₂ :=
by rw [vadd_eq_vadd_iff_neg_add_eq_vsub, neg_add_eq_sub]
lemma vsub_sub_vsub_comm (p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P) :
(p₁ -ᵥ p₂) - (p₃ -ᵥ p₄) = (p₁ -ᵥ p₃) - (p₂ -ᵥ p₄) :=
by rw [← vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_comm, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub]
end comm
namespace prod
variables {G : Type*} {P : Type*} {G' : Type*} {P' : Type*} [add_group G] [add_group G']
[add_torsor G P] [add_torsor G' P']
instance : add_torsor (G × G') (P × P') :=
{ vadd := λ v p, (v.1 +ᵥ p.1, v.2 +ᵥ p.2),
zero_vadd := λ p, by simp,
add_vadd := by simp [add_vadd],
vsub := λ p₁ p₂, (p₁.1 -ᵥ p₂.1, p₁.2 -ᵥ p₂.2),
nonempty := prod.nonempty,
vsub_vadd' := λ p₁ p₂, show (p₁.1 -ᵥ p₂.1 +ᵥ p₂.1, _) = p₁, by simp,
vadd_vsub' := λ v p, show (v.1 +ᵥ p.1 -ᵥ p.1, v.2 +ᵥ p.2 -ᵥ p.2) =v, by simp }
@[simp] lemma fst_vadd (v : G × G') (p : P × P') : (v +ᵥ p).1 = v.1 +ᵥ p.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_vadd (v : G × G') (p : P × P') : (v +ᵥ p).2 = v.2 +ᵥ p.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_vadd_mk (v : G) (v' : G') (p : P) (p' : P') :
(v, v') +ᵥ (p, p') = (v +ᵥ p, v' +ᵥ p') := rfl
@[simp] lemma fst_vsub (p₁ p₂ : P × P') : (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : G × G').1 = p₁.1 -ᵥ p₂.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_vsub (p₁ p₂ : P × P') : (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : G × G').2 = p₁.2 -ᵥ p₂.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_vsub_mk (p₁ p₂ : P) (p₁' p₂' : P') :
((p₁, p₁') -ᵥ (p₂, p₂') : G × G') = (p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₁' -ᵥ p₂') := rfl
end prod
namespace pi
universes u v w
variables {I : Type u} {fg : I → Type v} [∀ i, add_group (fg i)] {fp : I → Type w}
open add_action add_torsor
/-- A product of `add_torsor`s is an `add_torsor`. -/
instance [T : ∀ i, add_torsor (fg i) (fp i)] : add_torsor (Π i, fg i) (Π i, fp i) :=
{ vadd := λ g p, λ i, g i +ᵥ p i,
zero_vadd := λ p, funext $ λ i, zero_vadd (fg i) (p i),
add_vadd := λ g₁ g₂ p, funext $ λ i, add_vadd (g₁ i) (g₂ i) (p i),
vsub := λ p₁ p₂, λ i, p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i,
nonempty := ⟨λ i, classical.choice (T i).nonempty⟩,
vsub_vadd' := λ p₁ p₂, funext $ λ i, vsub_vadd (p₁ i) (p₂ i),
vadd_vsub' := λ g p, funext $ λ i, vadd_vsub (g i) (p i) }
/-- Addition in a product of `add_torsor`s. -/
@[simp] lemma vadd_apply [T : ∀ i, add_torsor (fg i) (fp i)] (x : Π i, fg i) (y : Π i, fp i)
{i : I} : (x +ᵥ y) i = x i +ᵥ y i
:= rfl
end pi
namespace equiv
variables {G : Type*} {P : Type*} [add_group G] [add_torsor G P]
include G
/-- `v ↦ v +ᵥ p` as an equivalence. -/
def vadd_const (p : P) : G ≃ P :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v +ᵥ p,
inv_fun := λ p', p' -ᵥ p,
left_inv := λ v, vadd_vsub _ _,
right_inv := λ p', vsub_vadd _ _ }
@[simp] lemma coe_vadd_const (p : P) : ⇑(vadd_const p) = λ v, v+ᵥ p := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_vadd_const_symm (p : P) : ⇑(vadd_const p).symm = λ p', p' -ᵥ p := rfl
/-- `p' ↦ p -ᵥ p'` as an equivalence. -/
def const_vsub (p : P) : P ≃ G :=
{ to_fun := (-ᵥ) p,
inv_fun := λ v, -v +ᵥ p,
left_inv := λ p', by simp,
right_inv := λ v, by simp [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub] }
@[simp] lemma coe_const_vsub (p : P) : ⇑(const_vsub p) = (-ᵥ) p := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_const_vsub_symm (p : P) : ⇑(const_vsub p).symm = λ v, -v +ᵥ p := rfl
variables (P)
/-- The permutation given by `p ↦ v +ᵥ p`. -/
def const_vadd (v : G) : equiv.perm P :=
{ to_fun := (+ᵥ) v,
inv_fun := (+ᵥ) (-v),
left_inv := λ p, by simp [vadd_vadd],
right_inv := λ p, by simp [vadd_vadd] }
@[simp] lemma coe_const_vadd (v : G) : ⇑(const_vadd P v) = (+ᵥ) v := rfl
variable (G)
@[simp] lemma const_vadd_zero : const_vadd P (0:G) = 1 := ext $ zero_vadd G
variable {G}
@[simp] lemma const_vadd_add (v₁ v₂ : G) :
const_vadd P (v₁ + v₂) = const_vadd P v₁ * const_vadd P v₂ :=
ext $ add_vadd v₁ v₂
/-- `equiv.const_vadd` as a homomorphism from `multiplicative G` to `equiv.perm P` -/
def const_vadd_hom : multiplicative G →* equiv.perm P :=
{ to_fun := λ v, const_vadd P v.to_add,
map_one' := const_vadd_zero G P,
map_mul' := const_vadd_add P }
variable {P}
open function
/-- Point reflection in `x` as a permutation. -/
def point_reflection (x : P) : perm P := (const_vsub x).trans (vadd_const x)
lemma point_reflection_apply (x y : P) : point_reflection x y = x -ᵥ y +ᵥ x := rfl
@[simp] lemma point_reflection_symm (x : P) : (point_reflection x).symm = point_reflection x :=
ext $ by simp [point_reflection]
@[simp] lemma point_reflection_self (x : P) : point_reflection x x = x := vsub_vadd _ _
lemma point_reflection_involutive (x : P) : involutive (point_reflection x : P → P) :=
λ y, (equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply _).2 $ by rw point_reflection_symm
/-- `x` is the only fixed point of `point_reflection x`. This lemma requires
`x + x = y + y ↔ x = y`. There is no typeclass to use here, so we add it as an explicit argument. -/
lemma point_reflection_fixed_iff_of_injective_bit0 {x y : P} (h : injective (bit0 : G → G)) :
point_reflection x y = y ↔ y = x :=
by rw [point_reflection_apply, eq_comm, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev,
neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, ← bit0, ← bit0_zero, h.eq_iff, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq, eq_comm]
omit G
lemma injective_point_reflection_left_of_injective_bit0 {G P : Type*} [add_comm_group G]
[add_torsor G P] (h : injective (bit0 : G → G)) (y : P) :
injective (λ x : P, point_reflection x y) :=
λ x₁ x₂ (hy : point_reflection x₁ y = point_reflection x₂ y),
by rwa [point_reflection_apply, point_reflection_apply, vadd_eq_vadd_iff_sub_eq_vsub,
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, ← bit0, ← bit0_zero,
h.eq_iff, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hy
end equiv
|
93abd5f0427fcad5fe4bb75968ab560b7c0e5daf | 1dd482be3f611941db7801003235dc84147ec60a | /src/ring_theory/ideals.lean | 9c65a7be0ce92d737f86193dd58d4183521bc6f3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sanderdahmen/mathlib | 479039302bd66434bb5672c2a4cecf8d69981458 | 8f0eae75cd2d8b7a083cf935666fcce4565df076 | refs/heads/master | 1,587,491,322,775 | 1,549,672,060,000 | 1,549,672,060,000 | 169,748,224 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,549,636,694,000 | 1,549,636,694,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,742 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Chris Hughes, Mario Carneiro
-/
import linear_algebra.basic ring_theory.associated order.zorn
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [comm_ring α] {a b : α}
open set function lattice
local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable
namespace ideal
variable (I : ideal α)
@[extensionality] lemma ext {I J : ideal α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ I ↔ x ∈ J) : I = J :=
submodule.ext h
theorem eq_top_of_unit_mem
(x y : α) (hx : x ∈ I) (h : y * x = 1) : I = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 $ λ z _, calc
z = z * (y * x) : by simp [h]
... = (z * y) * x : eq.symm $ mul_assoc z y x
... ∈ I : I.mul_mem_left hx
theorem eq_top_of_is_unit_mem {x} (hx : x ∈ I) (h : is_unit x) : I = ⊤ :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := is_unit_iff_exists_inv'.1 h in eq_top_of_unit_mem I x y hx hy
theorem eq_top_iff_one : I = ⊤ ↔ (1:α) ∈ I :=
⟨by rintro rfl; trivial,
λ h, eq_top_of_unit_mem _ _ 1 h (by simp)⟩
theorem ne_top_iff_one : I ≠ ⊤ ↔ (1:α) ∉ I :=
not_congr I.eq_top_iff_one
def span (s : set α) : ideal α := submodule.span α s
lemma subset_span {s : set α} : s ⊆ span s := submodule.subset_span
lemma span_le {s : set α} {I} : span s ≤ I ↔ s ⊆ I := submodule.span_le
lemma span_mono {s t : set α} : s ⊆ t → span s ≤ span t := submodule.span_mono
@[simp] lemma span_eq : span (I : set α) = I := submodule.span_eq _
@[simp] lemma span_singleton_one : span ({1} : set α) = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ subset_span $ mem_singleton _
lemma mem_span_insert {s : set α} {x y} :
x ∈ span (insert y s) ↔ ∃ a (z ∈ span s), x = a * y + z := submodule.mem_span_insert
lemma mem_span_insert' {s : set α} {x y} :
x ∈ span (insert y s) ↔ ∃a, x + a * y ∈ span s := submodule.mem_span_insert'
lemma mem_span_singleton' {x y : α} :
x ∈ span ({y} : set α) ↔ ∃ a, a * y = x := submodule.mem_span_singleton
lemma mem_span_singleton {x y : α} :
x ∈ span ({y} : set α) ↔ y ∣ x :=
mem_span_singleton'.trans $ exists_congr $ λ _, by rw [eq_comm, mul_comm]; refl
lemma span_singleton_le_span_singleton {x y : α} :
span ({x} : set α) ≤ span ({y} : set α) ↔ y ∣ x :=
span_le.trans $ singleton_subset_iff.trans mem_span_singleton
lemma span_eq_bot {s : set α} : span s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, (x:α) = 0 := submodule.span_eq_bot
lemma span_singleton_eq_bot {x} : span ({x} : set α) = ⊥ ↔ x = 0 := submodule.span_singleton_eq_bot
lemma span_singleton_eq_top {x} : span ({x} : set α) = ⊤ ↔ is_unit x :=
by rw [is_unit_iff_dvd_one, ← span_singleton_le_span_singleton, span_singleton_one, eq_top_iff]
@[class] def is_prime (I : ideal α) : Prop :=
I ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ {x y : α}, x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I
theorem is_prime.mem_or_mem {I : ideal α} (hI : I.is_prime) :
∀ {x y : α}, x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I := hI.2
theorem is_prime.mem_or_mem_of_mul_eq_zero {I : ideal α} (hI : I.is_prime)
{x y : α} (h : x * y = 0) : x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I :=
hI.2 (h.symm ▸ I.zero_mem)
theorem is_prime.mem_of_pow_mem {I : ideal α} (hI : I.is_prime)
{r : α} (n : ℕ) (H : r^n ∈ I) : r ∈ I :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ exact (mt (eq_top_iff_one _).2 hI.1).elim H },
exact or.cases_on (hI.mem_or_mem H) id ih
end
@[class] def zero_ne_one_of_proper {I : ideal α} (h : I ≠ ⊤) : (0:α) ≠ 1 :=
λ hz, I.ne_top_iff_one.1 h $ hz ▸ I.zero_mem
theorem span_singleton_prime {p : α} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
is_prime (span ({p} : set α)) ↔ prime p :=
by simp [is_prime, prime, span_singleton_eq_top, hp, mem_span_singleton]
@[class] def is_maximal (I : ideal α) : Prop :=
I ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ J, I < J → J = ⊤
theorem is_maximal_iff {I : ideal α} : I.is_maximal ↔
(1:α) ∉ I ∧ ∀ (J : ideal α) x, I ≤ J → x ∉ I → x ∈ J → (1:α) ∈ J :=
and_congr I.ne_top_iff_one $ forall_congr $ λ J,
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le]; exact
⟨λ H x h hx₁ hx₂, J.eq_top_iff_one.1 $
H ⟨h, not_subset.2 ⟨_, hx₂, hx₁⟩⟩,
λ H ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, let ⟨x, xJ, xI⟩ := not_subset.1 h₂ in
J.eq_top_iff_one.2 $ H x h₁ xI xJ⟩
theorem is_maximal.eq_of_le {I J : ideal α}
(hI : I.is_maximal) (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) (IJ : I ≤ J) : I = J :=
eq_iff_le_not_lt.2 ⟨IJ, λ h, hJ (hI.2 _ h)⟩
theorem is_maximal.exists_inv {I : ideal α}
(hI : I.is_maximal) {x} (hx : x ∉ I) : ∃ y, y * x - 1 ∈ I :=
begin
cases is_maximal_iff.1 hI with H₁ H₂,
rcases mem_span_insert'.1 (H₂ (span (insert x I)) x
(set.subset.trans (subset_insert _ _) subset_span)
hx (subset_span (mem_insert _ _))) with ⟨y, hy⟩,
rw [span_eq, ← neg_mem_iff, add_comm, neg_add', neg_mul_eq_neg_mul] at hy,
exact ⟨-y, hy⟩
end
theorem is_maximal.is_prime {I : ideal α} (H : I.is_maximal) : I.is_prime :=
⟨H.1, λ x y hxy, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hx, begin
cases H.exists_inv hx with z hz,
have := I.mul_mem_left hz,
rw [mul_sub, mul_one, mul_comm, mul_assoc] at this,
exact I.neg_mem_iff.1 ((I.add_mem_iff_right $ I.mul_mem_left hxy).1 this)
end⟩
instance is_maximal.is_prime' (I : ideal α) : ∀ [H : I.is_maximal], I.is_prime := is_maximal.is_prime
theorem exists_le_maximal (I : ideal α) (hI : I ≠ ⊤) :
∃ M : ideal α, M.is_maximal ∧ I ≤ M :=
begin
rcases zorn.zorn_partial_order₀ { J : ideal α | J ≠ ⊤ } _ I hI with ⟨M, M0, IM, h⟩,
{ refine ⟨M, ⟨M0, λ J hJ, by_contradiction $ λ J0, _⟩, IM⟩,
cases h J J0 (le_of_lt hJ), exact lt_irrefl _ hJ },
{ intros S SC cC I IS,
refine ⟨Sup S, λ H, _, λ _, le_Sup⟩,
rcases submodule.mem_Sup_of_directed ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 H) I IS cC.directed_on with ⟨J, JS, J0⟩,
exact SC JS ((eq_top_iff_one _).2 J0) }
end
def is_coprime (x y : α) : Prop :=
span ({x, y} : set α) = ⊤
theorem mem_span_pair {α} [comm_ring α] {x y z : α} :
z ∈ span (insert y {x} : set α) ↔ ∃ a b, a * x + b * y = z :=
begin
simp only [mem_span_insert, mem_span_singleton', exists_prop],
split,
{ rintros ⟨a, b, ⟨c, hc⟩, h⟩,
exact ⟨c, a, by simp [h, hc]⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨b, c, e⟩, exact ⟨c, b * x, ⟨b, rfl⟩, by simp [e.symm]⟩ }
end
theorem is_coprime_def {α} [comm_ring α] {x y : α} :
is_coprime x y ↔ ∀ z, ∃ a b, a * x + b * y = z :=
by simp [is_coprime, submodule.eq_top_iff', mem_span_pair]
theorem is_coprime_self {α} [comm_ring α] (x y : α) :
is_coprime x x ↔ is_unit x :=
by rw [← span_singleton_eq_top]; simp [is_coprime]
lemma span_singleton_lt_span_singleton [integral_domain β] {x y : β} :
span ({x} : set β) < span ({y} : set β) ↔ y ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ d : β, ¬ is_unit d ∧ x = y * d :=
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, span_singleton_le_span_singleton, span_singleton_le_span_singleton,
dvd_and_not_dvd_iff]
end ideal
def nonunits (α : Type u) [monoid α] : set α := { x | ¬is_unit x }
@[simp] theorem mem_nonunits_iff {α} [comm_monoid α] {x} : x ∈ nonunits α ↔ ¬ is_unit x := iff.rfl
theorem mul_mem_nonunits_right {α} [comm_monoid α]
{x y : α} : y ∈ nonunits α → x * y ∈ nonunits α :=
mt is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_right
theorem mul_mem_nonunits_left {α} [comm_monoid α]
{x y : α} : x ∈ nonunits α → x * y ∈ nonunits α :=
mt is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left
theorem zero_mem_nonunits {α} [semiring α] : 0 ∈ nonunits α ↔ (0:α) ≠ 1 :=
not_congr is_unit_zero_iff
theorem one_not_mem_nonunits {α} [monoid α] : (1:α) ∉ nonunits α :=
not_not_intro is_unit_one
theorem coe_subset_nonunits {I : ideal α} (h : I ≠ ⊤) :
(I : set α) ⊆ nonunits α :=
λ x hx hu, h $ I.eq_top_of_is_unit_mem hx hu
@[class] def is_local_ring (α : Type u) [comm_ring α] : Prop :=
∃! I : ideal α, I.is_maximal
@[class] def is_local_ring.zero_ne_one (h : is_local_ring α) : (0:α) ≠ 1 :=
let ⟨I, ⟨hI, _⟩, _⟩ := h in ideal.zero_ne_one_of_proper hI
def nonunits_ideal (h : is_local_ring α) : ideal α :=
{ carrier := nonunits α,
zero := zero_mem_nonunits.2 h.zero_ne_one,
add := begin
rcases id h with ⟨M, mM, hM⟩,
have : ∀ x ∈ nonunits α, x ∈ M,
{ intros x hx,
rcases (ideal.span {x} : ideal α).exists_le_maximal _ with ⟨N, mN, hN⟩,
{ cases hM N mN,
rwa [ideal.span_le, singleton_subset_iff] at hN },
{ exact mt ideal.span_singleton_eq_top.1 hx } },
intros x y hx hy,
exact coe_subset_nonunits mM.1 (M.add_mem (this _ hx) (this _ hy))
end,
smul := λ a x, mul_mem_nonunits_right }
@[simp] theorem mem_nonunits_ideal (h : is_local_ring α) {x} :
x ∈ nonunits_ideal h ↔ x ∈ nonunits α := iff.rfl
theorem local_of_nonunits_ideal (hnze : (0:α) ≠ 1)
(h : ∀ x y ∈ nonunits α, x + y ∈ nonunits α) : is_local_ring α :=
begin
letI NU : ideal α := ⟨nonunits α,
zero_mem_nonunits.2 hnze, h, λ a x, mul_mem_nonunits_right⟩,
have NU1 := NU.ne_top_iff_one.2 one_not_mem_nonunits,
exact ⟨NU, ⟨NU1,
λ J hJ, not_not.1 $ λ J0, not_le_of_gt hJ (coe_subset_nonunits J0)⟩,
λ J mJ, mJ.eq_of_le NU1 (coe_subset_nonunits mJ.1)⟩,
end
namespace ideal
open ideal
def quotient (I : ideal α) := I.quotient
namespace quotient
variables {I : ideal α} {x y : α}
def mk (I : ideal α) (a : α) : I.quotient := submodule.quotient.mk a
protected theorem eq : mk I x = mk I y ↔ x - y ∈ I := submodule.quotient.eq I
instance (I : ideal α) : has_one I.quotient := ⟨mk I 1⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_one (I : ideal α) : mk I 1 = 1 := rfl
instance (I : ideal α) : has_mul I.quotient :=
⟨λ a b, quotient.lift_on₂' a b (λ a b, mk I (a * b)) $
λ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ h₁ h₂, quot.sound $ begin
refine calc a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂ = a₂ * (a₁ - b₁) + (a₂ - b₂) * b₁ : _
... ∈ I : I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left h₁) (I.mul_mem_right h₂),
rw [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel, mul_comm, mul_comm b₁]
end⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_mul : mk I (x * y) = mk I x * mk I y := rfl
instance (I : ideal α) : comm_ring I.quotient :=
{ mul := (*),
one := 1,
mul_assoc := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃' a b c $
λ a b c, congr_arg (mk _) (mul_assoc a b c),
mul_comm := λ a b, quotient.induction_on₂' a b $
λ a b, congr_arg (mk _) (mul_comm a b),
one_mul := λ a, quotient.induction_on' a $
λ a, congr_arg (mk _) (one_mul a),
mul_one := λ a, quotient.induction_on' a $
λ a, congr_arg (mk _) (mul_one a),
left_distrib := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃' a b c $
λ a b c, congr_arg (mk _) (left_distrib a b c),
right_distrib := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃' a b c $
λ a b c, congr_arg (mk _) (right_distrib a b c),
..submodule.quotient.add_comm_group I }
instance is_ring_hom_mk (I : ideal α) : is_ring_hom (mk I) :=
⟨rfl, λ _ _, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
def map_mk (I J : ideal α) : ideal I.quotient :=
{ carrier := mk I '' J,
zero := ⟨0, J.zero_mem, rfl⟩,
add := by rintro _ _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩;
exact ⟨x + y, J.add_mem hx hy, rfl⟩,
smul := by rintro ⟨c⟩ _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩;
exact ⟨c * x, J.mul_mem_left hx, rfl⟩ }
@[simp] lemma mk_zero (I : ideal α) : mk I 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_add (I : ideal α) (a b : α) : mk I (a + b) = mk I a + mk I b := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_neg (I : ideal α) (a : α) : mk I (-a : α) = -mk I a := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_sub (I : ideal α) (a b : α) : mk I (a - b : α) = mk I a - mk I b := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_pow (I : ideal α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) : mk I (a ^ n : α) = mk I a ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [*, pow_succ]
lemma eq_zero_iff_mem {I : ideal α} : mk I a = 0 ↔ a ∈ I :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw ← sub_zero a }; exact quotient.eq'
theorem zero_eq_one_iff {I : ideal α} : (0 : I.quotient) = 1 ↔ I = ⊤ :=
eq_comm.trans $ eq_zero_iff_mem.trans (eq_top_iff_one _).symm
theorem zero_ne_one_iff {I : ideal α} : (0 : I.quotient) ≠ 1 ↔ I ≠ ⊤ :=
not_congr zero_eq_one_iff
protected def nonzero_comm_ring {I : ideal α} (hI : I ≠ ⊤) : nonzero_comm_ring I.quotient :=
{ zero_ne_one := zero_ne_one_iff.2 hI, ..quotient.comm_ring I }
instance (I : ideal α) [hI : I.is_prime] : integral_domain I.quotient :=
{ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := λ a b,
quotient.induction_on₂' a b $ λ a b hab,
(hI.mem_or_mem (eq_zero_iff_mem.1 hab)).elim
(or.inl ∘ eq_zero_iff_mem.2)
(or.inr ∘ eq_zero_iff_mem.2),
..quotient.nonzero_comm_ring hI.1 }
lemma exists_inv {I : ideal α} [hI : I.is_maximal] :
∀ {a : I.quotient}, a ≠ 0 → ∃ b : I.quotient, a * b = 1 :=
begin
rintro ⟨a⟩ h,
cases hI.exists_inv (mt eq_zero_iff_mem.2 h) with b hb,
rw [mul_comm] at hb,
exact ⟨mk _ b, quot.sound hb⟩
end
/-- quotient by maximal ideal is a field. def rather than instance, since users will have
computable inverses in some applications -/
protected noncomputable def field (I : ideal α) [hI : I.is_maximal] : field I.quotient :=
{ inv := λ a, if ha : a = 0 then 0 else classical.some (exists_inv ha),
mul_inv_cancel := λ a (ha : a ≠ 0), show a * dite _ _ _ = _,
by rw dif_neg ha;
exact classical.some_spec (exists_inv ha),
inv_mul_cancel := λ a (ha : a ≠ 0), show dite _ _ _ * a = _,
by rw [mul_comm, dif_neg ha];
exact classical.some_spec (exists_inv ha),
..quotient.integral_domain I }
variable [comm_ring β]
def lift (S : ideal α) (f : α → β) [is_ring_hom f] (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ S → f a = 0) :
quotient S → β :=
λ x, quotient.lift_on' x f $ λ (a b) (h : _ ∈ _),
eq_of_sub_eq_zero (by simpa only [is_ring_hom.map_sub f] using H _ h)
variables {S : ideal α} {f : α → β} [is_ring_hom f] {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ S → f a = 0}
@[simp] lemma lift_mk : lift S f H (mk S a) = f a := rfl
instance : is_ring_hom (lift S f H) :=
{ map_one := by show lift S f H (mk S 1) = 1; simp [is_ring_hom.map_one f, - mk_one],
map_add := λ a₁ a₂, quotient.induction_on₂' a₁ a₂ $ λ a₁ a₂, begin
show lift S f H (mk S a₁ + mk S a₂) = lift S f H (mk S a₁) + lift S f H (mk S a₂),
have := ideal.quotient.is_ring_hom_mk S,
rw ← this.map_add,
show lift S f H (mk S (a₁ + a₂)) = lift S f H (mk S a₁) + lift S f H (mk S a₂),
simp only [lift_mk, is_ring_hom.map_add f],
end,
map_mul := λ a₁ a₂, quotient.induction_on₂' a₁ a₂ $ λ a₁ a₂, begin
show lift S f H (mk S a₁ * mk S a₂) = lift S f H (mk S a₁) * lift S f H (mk S a₂),
have := ideal.quotient.is_ring_hom_mk S,
rw ← this.map_mul,
show lift S f H (mk S (a₁ * a₂)) = lift S f H (mk S a₁) * lift S f H (mk S a₂),
simp only [lift_mk, is_ring_hom.map_mul f],
end }
end quotient
end ideal
|
12399dfb0d0c144f2d7f262becf86f616fd1a94b | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/algebra/order/nonneg/ring.lean | ea6fc733743010bfde60ba4af56daa7da8975680 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,223 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import data.nat.cast.basic
import algebra.order.ring.defs
import algebra.order.ring.inj_surj
import algebra.group_power.order
import order.complete_lattice_intervals
import order.lattice_intervals
/-!
# The type of nonnegative elements
This file defines instances and prove some properties about the nonnegative elements
`{x : α // 0 ≤ x}` of an arbitrary type `α`.
Currently we only state instances and states some `simp`/`norm_cast` lemmas.
When `α` is `ℝ`, this will give us some properties about `ℝ≥0`.
## Main declarations
* `{x : α // 0 ≤ x}` is a `canonically_linear_ordered_add_monoid` if `α` is a `linear_ordered_ring`.
## Implementation Notes
Instead of `{x : α // 0 ≤ x}` we could also use `set.Ici (0 : α)`, which is definitionally equal.
However, using the explicit subtype has a big advantage: when writing and element explicitly
with a proof of nonnegativity as `⟨x, hx⟩`, the `hx` is expected to have type `0 ≤ x`. If we would
use `Ici 0`, then the type is expected to be `x ∈ Ici 0`. Although these types are definitionally
equal, this often confuses the elaborator. Similar problems arise when doing cases on an element.
The disadvantage is that we have to duplicate some instances about `set.Ici` to this subtype.
-/
open set
variables {α : Type*}
namespace nonneg
/-- This instance uses data fields from `subtype.partial_order` to help type-class inference.
The `set.Ici` data fields are definitionally equal, but that requires unfolding semireducible
definitions, so type-class inference won't see this. -/
instance order_bot [preorder α] {a : α} : order_bot {x : α // a ≤ x} :=
{ ..set.Ici.order_bot }
lemma bot_eq [preorder α] {a : α} : (⊥ : {x : α // a ≤ x}) = ⟨a, le_rfl⟩ := rfl
instance no_max_order [partial_order α] [no_max_order α] {a : α} : no_max_order {x : α // a ≤ x} :=
set.Ici.no_max_order
instance semilattice_sup [semilattice_sup α] {a : α} : semilattice_sup {x : α // a ≤ x} :=
set.Ici.semilattice_sup
instance semilattice_inf [semilattice_inf α] {a : α} : semilattice_inf {x : α // a ≤ x} :=
set.Ici.semilattice_inf
instance distrib_lattice [distrib_lattice α] {a : α} : distrib_lattice {x : α // a ≤ x} :=
set.Ici.distrib_lattice
instance densely_ordered [preorder α] [densely_ordered α] {a : α} :
densely_ordered {x : α // a ≤ x} :=
show densely_ordered (Ici a), from set.densely_ordered
/-- If `Sup ∅ ≤ a` then `{x : α // a ≤ x}` is a `conditionally_complete_linear_order`. -/
@[reducible]
protected noncomputable def conditionally_complete_linear_order
[conditionally_complete_linear_order α] {a : α} :
conditionally_complete_linear_order {x : α // a ≤ x} :=
{ .. @ord_connected_subset_conditionally_complete_linear_order α (set.Ici a) _ ⟨⟨a, le_rfl⟩⟩ _ }
/-- If `Sup ∅ ≤ a` then `{x : α // a ≤ x}` is a `conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot`.
This instance uses data fields from `subtype.linear_order` to help type-class inference.
The `set.Ici` data fields are definitionally equal, but that requires unfolding semireducible
definitions, so type-class inference won't see this. -/
@[reducible]
protected noncomputable def conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot
[conditionally_complete_linear_order α] {a : α} (h : Sup ∅ ≤ a) :
conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot {x : α // a ≤ x} :=
{ cSup_empty := (function.funext_iff.1
(@subset_Sup_def α (set.Ici a) _ ⟨⟨a, le_rfl⟩⟩) ∅).trans $ subtype.eq $
by { rw bot_eq, cases h.lt_or_eq with h2 h2, { simp [h2.not_le] }, simp [h2] },
..nonneg.order_bot,
..nonneg.conditionally_complete_linear_order }
instance inhabited [preorder α] {a : α} : inhabited {x : α // a ≤ x} :=
⟨⟨a, le_rfl⟩⟩
instance has_zero [has_zero α] [preorder α] : has_zero {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
⟨⟨0, le_rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected lemma coe_zero [has_zero α] [preorder α] : ((0 : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) : α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_eq_zero [has_zero α] [preorder α] {x : α} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
(⟨x, hx⟩ : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
subtype.ext_iff
instance has_add [add_zero_class α] [preorder α] [covariant_class α α (+) (≤)] :
has_add {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
⟨λ x y, ⟨x + y, add_nonneg x.2 y.2⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_add_mk [add_zero_class α] [preorder α] [covariant_class α α (+) (≤)] {x y : α}
(hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : (⟨x, hx⟩ : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) + ⟨y, hy⟩ = ⟨x + y, add_nonneg hx hy⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected lemma coe_add [add_zero_class α] [preorder α] [covariant_class α α (+) (≤)]
(a b : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) : ((a + b : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) : α) = a + b := rfl
instance has_nsmul [add_monoid α] [preorder α] [covariant_class α α (+) (≤)] :
has_smul ℕ {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
⟨λ n x, ⟨n • x, nsmul_nonneg x.prop n⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma nsmul_mk [add_monoid α] [preorder α] [covariant_class α α (+) (≤)] (n : ℕ)
{x : α} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (n • ⟨x, hx⟩ : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) = ⟨n • x, nsmul_nonneg hx n⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected lemma coe_nsmul [add_monoid α] [preorder α] [covariant_class α α (+) (≤)]
(n : ℕ) (a : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) : ((n • a : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) : α) = n • a := rfl
instance ordered_add_comm_monoid [ordered_add_comm_monoid α] :
ordered_add_comm_monoid {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
subtype.coe_injective.ordered_add_comm_monoid _ rfl (λ x y, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
instance linear_ordered_add_comm_monoid [linear_ordered_add_comm_monoid α] :
linear_ordered_add_comm_monoid {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
subtype.coe_injective.linear_ordered_add_comm_monoid _ rfl (λ x y, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
(λ _ _, rfl)
instance ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] :
ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
subtype.coe_injective.ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid _ rfl (λ x y, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
instance linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] :
linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
subtype.coe_injective.linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid _ rfl (λ x y, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
(λ _ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
/-- Coercion `{x : α // 0 ≤ x} → α` as a `add_monoid_hom`. -/
def coe_add_monoid_hom [ordered_add_comm_monoid α] : {x : α // 0 ≤ x} →+ α :=
⟨coe, nonneg.coe_zero, nonneg.coe_add⟩
@[norm_cast]
lemma nsmul_coe [ordered_add_comm_monoid α] (n : ℕ) (r : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) :
↑(n • r) = n • (r : α) :=
nonneg.coe_add_monoid_hom.map_nsmul _ _
instance has_one [ordered_semiring α] : has_one {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
{ one := ⟨1, zero_le_one⟩ }
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected lemma coe_one [ordered_semiring α] : ((1 : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) : α) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_eq_one [ordered_semiring α] {x : α} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
(⟨x, hx⟩ : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
subtype.ext_iff
instance has_mul [ordered_semiring α] : has_mul {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
{ mul := λ x y, ⟨x * y, mul_nonneg x.2 y.2⟩ }
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected lemma coe_mul [ordered_semiring α] (a b : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) :
((a * b : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) : α) = a * b := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_mul_mk [ordered_semiring α] {x y : α} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
(⟨x, hx⟩ : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) * ⟨y, hy⟩ = ⟨x * y, mul_nonneg hx hy⟩ :=
rfl
instance add_monoid_with_one [ordered_semiring α] : add_monoid_with_one {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
{ nat_cast := λ n, ⟨n, nat.cast_nonneg n⟩,
nat_cast_zero := by simp [nat.cast],
nat_cast_succ := λ _, by simp [nat.cast]; refl,
.. nonneg.has_one, .. nonneg.ordered_add_comm_monoid }
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected lemma coe_nat_cast [ordered_semiring α] (n : ℕ) : ((↑n : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) : α) = n := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_nat_cast [ordered_semiring α] (n : ℕ) :
(⟨n, n.cast_nonneg⟩ : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) = n := rfl
instance has_pow [ordered_semiring α] : has_pow {x : α // 0 ≤ x} ℕ :=
{ pow := λ x n, ⟨x ^ n, pow_nonneg x.2 n⟩ }
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected lemma coe_pow [ordered_semiring α] (a : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) (n : ℕ) :
(↑(a ^ n) : α) = a ^ n := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_pow [ordered_semiring α] {x : α} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) :
(⟨x, hx⟩ : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) ^ n = ⟨x ^ n, pow_nonneg hx n⟩ := rfl
instance ordered_semiring [ordered_semiring α] : ordered_semiring {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
subtype.coe_injective.ordered_semiring _
rfl rfl (λ x y, rfl) (λ x y, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _, rfl)
instance strict_ordered_semiring [strict_ordered_semiring α] :
strict_ordered_semiring {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
subtype.coe_injective.strict_ordered_semiring _
rfl rfl (λ x y, rfl) (λ x y, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _, rfl)
instance ordered_comm_semiring [ordered_comm_semiring α] : ordered_comm_semiring {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
subtype.coe_injective.ordered_comm_semiring _
rfl rfl (λ x y, rfl) (λ x y, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _, rfl)
instance strict_ordered_comm_semiring [strict_ordered_comm_semiring α] :
strict_ordered_comm_semiring {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
subtype.coe_injective.strict_ordered_comm_semiring _
rfl rfl (λ x y, rfl) (λ x y, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _, rfl)
-- These prevent noncomputable instances being found, as it does not require `linear_order` which
-- is frequently non-computable.
instance monoid_with_zero [ordered_semiring α] : monoid_with_zero {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
by apply_instance
instance comm_monoid_with_zero [ordered_comm_semiring α] : comm_monoid_with_zero {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
by apply_instance
instance semiring [ordered_semiring α] : semiring {x : α // 0 ≤ x} := infer_instance
instance comm_semiring [ordered_comm_semiring α] : comm_semiring {x : α // 0 ≤ x} := infer_instance
instance nontrivial [linear_ordered_semiring α] : nontrivial {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
⟨ ⟨0, 1, λ h, zero_ne_one (congr_arg subtype.val h)⟩ ⟩
instance linear_ordered_semiring [linear_ordered_semiring α] :
linear_ordered_semiring {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
subtype.coe_injective.linear_ordered_semiring _
rfl rfl (λ x y, rfl) (λ x y, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _, rfl)(λ _ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
instance linear_ordered_comm_monoid_with_zero [linear_ordered_comm_ring α] :
linear_ordered_comm_monoid_with_zero {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
{ mul_le_mul_left := λ a b h c, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h c.2,
..nonneg.linear_ordered_semiring,
..nonneg.ordered_comm_semiring }
/-- Coercion `{x : α // 0 ≤ x} → α` as a `ring_hom`. -/
def coe_ring_hom [ordered_semiring α] : {x : α // 0 ≤ x} →+* α :=
⟨coe, nonneg.coe_one, nonneg.coe_mul, nonneg.coe_zero, nonneg.coe_add⟩
instance canonically_ordered_add_monoid [ordered_ring α] :
canonically_ordered_add_monoid {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
{ le_self_add := λ a b, le_add_of_nonneg_right b.2,
exists_add_of_le := λ a b h,
⟨⟨b - a, sub_nonneg_of_le h⟩, subtype.ext (add_sub_cancel'_right _ _).symm⟩,
..nonneg.ordered_add_comm_monoid,
..nonneg.order_bot }
instance canonically_ordered_comm_semiring [ordered_comm_ring α] [no_zero_divisors α] :
canonically_ordered_comm_semiring {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
{ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := by { rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩, simp },
..nonneg.canonically_ordered_add_monoid,
..nonneg.ordered_comm_semiring }
instance canonically_linear_ordered_add_monoid [linear_ordered_ring α] :
canonically_linear_ordered_add_monoid {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
{ ..subtype.linear_order _, ..nonneg.canonically_ordered_add_monoid }
section linear_order
variables [has_zero α] [linear_order α]
/-- The function `a ↦ max a 0` of type `α → {x : α // 0 ≤ x}`. -/
def to_nonneg (a : α) : {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
⟨max a 0, le_max_right _ _⟩
@[simp]
lemma coe_to_nonneg {a : α} : (to_nonneg a : α) = max a 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma to_nonneg_of_nonneg {a : α} (h : 0 ≤ a) : to_nonneg a = ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by simp [to_nonneg, h]
@[simp]
lemma to_nonneg_coe {a : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}} : to_nonneg (a : α) = a :=
by { cases a with a ha, exact to_nonneg_of_nonneg ha }
@[simp]
lemma to_nonneg_le {a : α} {b : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}} : to_nonneg a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by { cases b with b hb, simp [to_nonneg, hb] }
@[simp]
lemma to_nonneg_lt {a : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}} {b : α} : a < to_nonneg b ↔ ↑a < b :=
by { cases a with a ha, simp [to_nonneg, ha.not_lt] }
instance has_sub [has_sub α] : has_sub {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
⟨λ x y, to_nonneg (x - y)⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_sub_mk [has_sub α] {x y : α}
(hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : (⟨x, hx⟩ : {x : α // 0 ≤ x}) - ⟨y, hy⟩ = to_nonneg (x - y) :=
rfl
end linear_order
instance has_ordered_sub [linear_ordered_ring α] : has_ordered_sub {x : α // 0 ≤ x} :=
⟨by { rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ ⟨c, hc⟩, simp only [sub_le_iff_le_add, subtype.mk_le_mk, mk_sub_mk,
mk_add_mk, to_nonneg_le, subtype.coe_mk]}⟩
end nonneg
|
32a7fd73a67f225b4d015537ecceb212db57f73a | 64874bd1010548c7f5a6e3e8902efa63baaff785 | /tests/lean/hott/tele.hlean | 59fe8c1939d8e1926c740c9788b0a6478323efa5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | tjiaqi/lean | 4634d729795c164664d10d093f3545287c76628f | d0ce4cf62f4246b0600c07e074d86e51f2195e30 | refs/heads/master | 1,622,323,796,480 | 1,422,643,069,000 | 1,422,643,069,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 509 | hlean | -- check @eq.rec
-- universe variable l_1
-- variables {A A' : Type.{l_1}} {e_1 : A = A'} {a : A}
-- check @eq.rec.{l_1 l_1+1} Type.{l_1} A (fun (A' : Type.{l_1}) (e_1 : A = A'), A') a A' e_1
open nat
inductive vec (A : Type) : nat → Type :=
nil {} : vec A zero,
cons : Π {n}, A → vec A n → vec A (succ n)
structure S (A : Type) (a : A) (n : nat) (v : vec A n) :=
mk :: (fa : A)
set_option pp.implicit true
#telescope_eq Π (A : Type) (a : A) (b : A) (c : nat) (d : vec A c) (e : S A a c d), nat
|
d1bc95431983ce0d8c71e365182a3a20703e141f | 4bcaca5dc83d49803f72b7b5920b75b6e7d9de2d | /stage0/src/Init/Data/Option/Basic.lean | cfa95d87ee842c4ec0a74162cabc7c19110f62e5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | subfish-zhou/leanprover-zh_CN.github.io | 30b9fba9bd790720bd95764e61ae796697d2f603 | 8b2985d4a3d458ceda9361ac454c28168d920d3f | refs/heads/master | 1,689,709,967,820 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 409,962,097 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,231 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Core
import Init.Control.Basic
import Init.Coe
namespace Option
def toMonad [Monad m] [Alternative m] : Option α → m α
| none => failure
| some a => pure a
@[inline] def toBool : Option α → Bool
| some _ => true
| none => false
@[inline] def isSome : Option α → Bool
| some _ => true
| none => false
@[inline] def isNone : Option α → Bool
| some _ => false
| none => true
@[inline] def isEqSome [BEq α] : Option α → α → Bool
| some a, b => a == b
| none, _ => false
@[inline] protected def bind : Option α → (α → Option β) → Option β
| none, b => none
| some a, b => b a
@[inline] protected def map (f : α → β) (o : Option α) : Option β :=
Option.bind o (some ∘ f)
theorem map_id : (Option.map id : Option α → Option α) = id :=
funext (fun o => match o with | none => rfl | some x => rfl)
instance : Functor Option where
map := Option.map
@[inline] protected def filter (p : α → Bool) : Option α → Option α
| some a => if p a then some a else none
| none => none
@[inline] protected def all (p : α → Bool) : Option α → Bool
| some a => p a
| none => true
@[inline] protected def any (p : α → Bool) : Option α → Bool
| some a => p a
| none => false
@[macroInline] protected def orElse : Option α → (Unit → Option α) → Option α
| some a, _ => some a
| none, b => b ()
instance : OrElse (Option α) where
orElse := Option.orElse
@[inline] protected def lt (r : α → α → Prop) : Option α → Option α → Prop
| none, some x => True
| some x, some y => r x y
| _, _ => False
instance (r : α → α → Prop) [s : DecidableRel r] : DecidableRel (Option.lt r)
| none, some y => isTrue trivial
| some x, some y => s x y
| some x, none => isFalse not_false
| none, none => isFalse not_false
end Option
deriving instance DecidableEq for Option
deriving instance BEq for Option
instance [LT α] : LT (Option α) where
lt := Option.lt (· < ·)
|
a70643106e75c84660a8329575b15a945034427c | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/ring_theory/non_zero_divisors_auto.lean | 9fd91645a1b57f595a422916b8b28a79df50cc10 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,181 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Devon Tuma
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.group_theory.submonoid.operations
import Mathlib.group_theory.submonoid.membership
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 u_2
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Non-zero divisors
In this file we define the submonoid `non_zero_divisors` of a `monoid_with_zero`.
-/
/-- The submonoid of non-zero-divisors of a `monoid_with_zero` `R`. -/
def non_zero_divisors (R : Type u_1) [monoid_with_zero R] : submonoid R :=
submonoid.mk (set_of fun (x : R) => ∀ (z : R), z * x = 0 → z = 0) sorry sorry
theorem mul_mem_non_zero_divisors {R : Type u_1} [comm_ring R] {a : R} {b : R} :
a * b ∈ non_zero_divisors R ↔ a ∈ non_zero_divisors R ∧ b ∈ non_zero_divisors R :=
sorry
theorem eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_right_eq_zero {A : Type u_2} [integral_domain A] {x : A} {y : A}
(hnx : x ≠ 0) (hxy : y * x = 0) : y = 0 :=
or.resolve_right (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero hxy) hnx
theorem eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_left_eq_zero {A : Type u_2} [integral_domain A] {x : A} {y : A}
(hnx : x ≠ 0) (hxy : x * y = 0) : y = 0 :=
or.resolve_left (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero hxy) hnx
theorem mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero {A : Type u_2} [integral_domain A] {x : A} :
x ∈ non_zero_divisors A ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
sorry
theorem map_ne_zero_of_mem_non_zero_divisors {R : Type u_1} [comm_ring R] [nontrivial R]
{B : Type u_2} [ring B] {g : R →+* B} (hg : function.injective ⇑g)
{x : ↥(non_zero_divisors R)} : coe_fn g ↑x ≠ 0 :=
fun (h0 : coe_fn g ↑x = 0) =>
one_ne_zero
(subtype.property x 1
(Eq.symm (one_mul (subtype.val x)) ▸ hg (trans h0 (Eq.symm (ring_hom.map_zero g)))))
theorem map_mem_non_zero_divisors {A : Type u_2} [integral_domain A] {B : Type u_1}
[integral_domain B] {g : A →+* B} (hg : function.injective ⇑g) {x : ↥(non_zero_divisors A)} :
coe_fn g ↑x ∈ non_zero_divisors B :=
fun (z : B) (hz : z * coe_fn g ↑x = 0) =>
eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_right_eq_zero (map_ne_zero_of_mem_non_zero_divisors hg) hz
theorem le_non_zero_divisors_of_domain {A : Type u_2} [integral_domain A] {M : submonoid A}
(hM : ¬↑0 ∈ M) : M ≤ non_zero_divisors A :=
fun (x : A) (hx : x ∈ M) (y : A) (hy : y * x = 0) =>
or.rec_on (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero hy) (fun (h : y = 0) => h)
fun (h : x = 0) => absurd (h ▸ hx) hM
theorem powers_le_non_zero_divisors_of_domain {A : Type u_2} [integral_domain A] {a : A}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : submonoid.powers a ≤ non_zero_divisors A :=
le_non_zero_divisors_of_domain
fun (h : ↑0 ∈ submonoid.powers a) =>
absurd (Exists.rec_on h fun (_x : ℕ) (hn : a ^ _x = ↑0) => pow_eq_zero hn) ha
theorem map_le_non_zero_divisors_of_injective {A : Type u_2} [integral_domain A] {B : Type u_1}
[integral_domain B] {f : A →+* B} (hf : function.injective ⇑f) {M : submonoid A}
(hM : M ≤ non_zero_divisors A) : submonoid.map (↑f) M ≤ non_zero_divisors B :=
sorry
end Mathlib |
1963975c177182c59ab8187786757cea09141af8 | a7eef317ddec01b9fc6cfbb876fe7ac00f205ac7 | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/zero.lean | 682e05b14d1f29dfd07117795b513bc040a1cc0a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kmill/mathlib | ea5a007b67ae4e9e18dd50d31d8aa60f650425ee | 1a419a9fea7b959317eddd556e1bb9639f4dcc05 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,578,197,719 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 276,482,939 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,593,637,960,000 | 1,593,637,959,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,751 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.limits.shapes.binary_products
import category_theory.limits.shapes.images
import category_theory.epi_mono
import category_theory.punit
import category_theory.discrete_category
/-!
# Zero morphisms and zero objects
A category "has zero morphisms" if there is a designated "zero morphism" in each morphism space,
and compositions of zero morphisms with anything give the zero morphism. (Notice this is extra
structure, not merely a property.)
A category "has a zero object" if it has an object which is both initial and terminal. Having a
zero object provides zero morphisms, as the unique morphisms factoring through the zero object.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_morphism
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
universes v u
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.limits
variables (C : Type u) [category.{v} C]
/-- A category "has zero morphisms" if there is a designated "zero morphism" in each morphism space,
and compositions of zero morphisms with anything give the zero morphism. -/
class has_zero_morphisms :=
[has_zero : Π X Y : C, has_zero (X ⟶ Y)]
(comp_zero' : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C), f ≫ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = (0 : X ⟶ Z) . obviously)
(zero_comp' : ∀ (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z), (0 : X ⟶ Y) ≫ f = (0 : X ⟶ Z) . obviously)
attribute [instance] has_zero_morphisms.has_zero
restate_axiom has_zero_morphisms.comp_zero'
attribute [simp] has_zero_morphisms.comp_zero
restate_axiom has_zero_morphisms.zero_comp'
attribute [simp, reassoc] has_zero_morphisms.zero_comp
instance has_zero_morphisms_pempty : has_zero_morphisms (discrete pempty) :=
{ has_zero := by tidy }
instance has_zero_morphisms_punit : has_zero_morphisms (discrete punit) :=
{ has_zero := by tidy }
namespace has_zero_morphisms
variables {C}
/-- This lemma will be immediately superseded by `ext`, below. -/
private lemma ext_aux (I J : has_zero_morphisms C)
(w : ∀ X Y : C, (@has_zero_morphisms.has_zero _ _ I X Y).zero = (@has_zero_morphisms.has_zero _ _ J X Y).zero) : I = J :=
begin
casesI I, casesI J,
congr,
{ ext X Y,
exact w X Y },
{ apply proof_irrel_heq, },
{ apply proof_irrel_heq, }
end
/--
If you're tempted to use this lemma "in the wild", you should probably
carefully consider whether you've made a mistake in allowing two
instances of `has_zero_morphisms` to exist at all.
See, particularly, the note on `zero_morphisms_of_zero_object` below.
-/
lemma ext (I J : has_zero_morphisms C) : I = J :=
begin
apply ext_aux,
intros X Y,
rw ←@has_zero_morphisms.comp_zero _ _ I X X (@has_zero_morphisms.has_zero _ _ J X X).zero,
rw @has_zero_morphisms.zero_comp _ _ J,
end
instance : subsingleton (has_zero_morphisms C) :=
⟨ext⟩
end has_zero_morphisms
open has_zero_morphisms
section
variables {C} [has_zero_morphisms C]
lemma zero_of_comp_mono {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [mono g] (h : f ≫ g = 0) : f = 0 :=
by { rw [←zero_comp X g, cancel_mono] at h, exact h }
lemma zero_of_epi_comp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) {g : Y ⟶ Z} [epi f] (h : f ≫ g = 0) : g = 0 :=
by { rw [←comp_zero f Z, cancel_epi] at h, exact h }
lemma eq_zero_of_image_eq_zero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [has_image f] (w : image.ι f = 0) : f = 0 :=
by rw [←image.fac f, w, has_zero_morphisms.comp_zero]
lemma nonzero_image_of_nonzero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [has_image f] (w : f ≠ 0) : image.ι f ≠ 0 :=
λ h, w (eq_zero_of_image_eq_zero h)
end
section
universes v' u'
variables (D : Type u') [category.{v'} D]
variables [has_zero_morphisms C] [has_zero_morphisms D]
@[simp] lemma equivalence_preserves_zero_morphisms (F : C ≌ D) (X Y : C) :
F.functor.map (0 : X ⟶ Y) = (0 : F.functor.obj X ⟶ F.functor.obj Y) :=
begin
have t : F.functor.map (0 : X ⟶ Y) = F.functor.map (0 : X ⟶ Y) ≫ (0 : F.functor.obj Y ⟶ F.functor.obj Y),
{ apply faithful.map_injective (F.inverse),
rw [functor.map_comp, equivalence.inv_fun_map],
dsimp,
rw [zero_comp, comp_zero, zero_comp], },
exact t.trans (by simp)
end
end
/-- A category "has a zero object" if it has an object which is both initial and terminal. -/
class has_zero_object :=
(zero : C)
(unique_to : Π X : C, unique (zero ⟶ X))
(unique_from : Π X : C, unique (X ⟶ zero))
instance has_zero_object_punit : has_zero_object (discrete punit) :=
{ zero := punit.star,
unique_to := by tidy,
unique_from := by tidy, }
variables {C}
namespace has_zero_object
variables [has_zero_object C]
/--
Construct a `has_zero C` for a category with a zero object.
This can not be a global instance as it will trigger for every `has_zero C` typeclass search.
-/
protected def has_zero : has_zero C :=
{ zero := has_zero_object.zero }
local attribute [instance] has_zero_object.has_zero
local attribute [instance] has_zero_object.unique_to has_zero_object.unique_from
@[ext]
lemma to_zero_ext {X : C} (f g : X ⟶ 0) : f = g :=
by rw [(has_zero_object.unique_from X).uniq f, (has_zero_object.unique_from X).uniq g]
@[ext]
lemma from_zero_ext {X : C} (f g : 0 ⟶ X) : f = g :=
by rw [(has_zero_object.unique_to X).uniq f, (has_zero_object.unique_to X).uniq g]
instance {X : C} (f : 0 ⟶ X) : mono f :=
{ right_cancellation := λ Z g h w, by ext, }
instance {X : C} (f : X ⟶ 0) : epi f :=
{ left_cancellation := λ Z g h w, by ext, }
/-- A category with a zero object has zero morphisms.
It is rarely a good idea to use this. Many categories that have a zero object have zero
morphisms for some other reason, for example from additivity. Library code that uses
`zero_morphisms_of_zero_object` will then be incompatible with these categories because
the `has_zero_morphisms` instances will not be definitionally equal. For this reason library
code should generally ask for an instance of `has_zero_morphisms` separately, even if it already
asks for an instance of `has_zero_objects`. -/
def zero_morphisms_of_zero_object : has_zero_morphisms C :=
{ has_zero := λ X Y,
{ zero := inhabited.default (X ⟶ 0) ≫ inhabited.default (0 ⟶ Y) },
zero_comp' := λ X Y Z f, by { dunfold has_zero.zero, rw category.assoc, congr, },
comp_zero' := λ X Y Z f, by { dunfold has_zero.zero, rw ←category.assoc, congr, }}
section
variable [has_zero_morphisms C]
/-- An arrow ending in the zero object is zero -/
-- This can't be a `simp` lemma because the left hand side would be a metavariable.
lemma zero_of_to_zero {X : C} (f : X ⟶ 0) : f = 0 :=
by ext
/-- An arrow starting at the zero object is zero -/
lemma zero_of_from_zero {X : C} (f : 0 ⟶ X) : f = 0 :=
by ext
end
/-- A zero object is in particular initial. -/
def has_initial : has_initial C :=
has_initial_of_unique 0
/-- A zero object is in particular terminal. -/
def has_terminal : has_terminal C :=
has_terminal_of_unique 0
end has_zero_object
/-- If there are zero morphisms, any initial object is a zero object. -/
@[priority 50]
instance has_zero_object_of_has_initial_object
[has_zero_morphisms C] [has_initial C] : has_zero_object C :=
{ zero := ⊥_ C,
unique_to := λ X, ⟨⟨0⟩, by tidy⟩,
unique_from := λ X, ⟨⟨0⟩, λ f,
calc
f = f ≫ 𝟙 _ : (category.comp_id _).symm
... = f ≫ 0 : by congr
... = 0 : has_zero_morphisms.comp_zero _ _
⟩ }
/-- If there are zero morphisms, any terminal object is a zero object. -/
@[priority 50]
instance has_zero_object_of_has_terminal_object
[has_zero_morphisms C] [has_terminal C] : has_zero_object C :=
{ zero := ⊤_ C,
unique_from := λ X, ⟨⟨0⟩, by tidy⟩,
unique_to := λ X, ⟨⟨0⟩, λ f,
calc
f = 𝟙 _ ≫ f : (category.id_comp _).symm
... = 0 ≫ f : by congr
... = 0 : has_zero_morphisms.zero_comp _ _
⟩ }
/-- In the presence of zero morphisms, coprojections into a coproduct are (split) monomorphisms. -/
instance split_mono_sigma_ι
{β : Type v} [decidable_eq β]
[has_zero_morphisms C]
(f : β → C) [has_colimit (discrete.functor f)] (b : β) : split_mono (sigma.ι f b) :=
{ retraction := sigma.desc (λ b', if h : b' = b then eq_to_hom (congr_arg f h) else 0), }
/-- In the presence of zero morphisms, projections into a product are (split) epimorphisms. -/
instance split_epi_pi_π
{β : Type v} [decidable_eq β]
[has_zero_morphisms C]
(f : β → C) [has_limit (discrete.functor f)] (b : β) : split_epi (pi.π f b) :=
{ section_ := pi.lift (λ b', if h : b = b' then eq_to_hom (congr_arg f h) else 0), }
/-- In the presence of zero morphisms, coprojections into a coproduct are (split) monomorphisms. -/
instance split_mono_coprod_inl
[has_zero_morphisms C] {X Y : C} [has_colimit (pair X Y)] :
split_mono (coprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y) :=
{ retraction := coprod.desc (𝟙 X) 0, }
/-- In the presence of zero morphisms, coprojections into a coproduct are (split) monomorphisms. -/
instance split_mono_coprod_inr
[has_zero_morphisms C] {X Y : C} [has_colimit (pair X Y)] :
split_mono (coprod.inr : Y ⟶ X ⨿ Y) :=
{ retraction := coprod.desc 0 (𝟙 Y), }
/-- In the presence of zero morphisms, projections into a product are (split) epimorphisms. -/
instance split_epi_prod_fst
[has_zero_morphisms C] {X Y : C} [has_limit (pair X Y)] :
split_epi (prod.fst : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X) :=
{ section_ := prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0, }
/-- In the presence of zero morphisms, projections into a product are (split) epimorphisms. -/
instance split_epi_prod_snd
[has_zero_morphisms C] {X Y : C} [has_limit (pair X Y)] :
split_epi (prod.snd : X ⨯ Y ⟶ Y) :=
{ section_ := prod.lift 0 (𝟙 Y), }
end category_theory.limits
|
6806db561b0e159543720cd7a6d849f786e09ebc | ece1fcd81204f318535500cde1f3c6433de98f46 | /src/affine_algebraic_set/V.lean | a95d725e4d37c4231589466515769a1f97a18ceb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/M4P33 | ab5d90bda269428aee16885dbd33f0d21d7d2f79 | d3b56421fcb03b935d9012e5a5b35e1c1ad0b0b4 | refs/heads/master | 1,607,921,471,294 | 1,579,298,081,000 | 1,579,298,081,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,899 | lean | /-
Algebraic geometry M4P33, Jan-Mar 2020, formalised in Lean.
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Buzzard
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, and whoever else in the class wants to join in.
Note: if you are viewing this file in a browser via the following
link:
https://leanprover-community.github.io/lean-web-editor/#url=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githubusercontent.com%2FImperialCollegeLondon%2FM4P33%2Fmaster%2Fsrc%2Faffine_algebraic_set%2FV.lean
then you can click around on the code and see the state of Lean's "brain"
at any point within any begin/end proof block.
-/
-- imports the theory of multivariable polynomials over rings
import data.mv_polynomial
import for_mathlib.mv_polynomial
-- imports the concept of the radical of an ideal
import ring_theory.ideal_operations
/-!
# Lecture 2 : The 𝕍 construction
Let k be a commutative ring and let n be a natural number.
This file defines the map 𝕍 from subsets of k[X₁,X₂,…,Xₙ]
to subsets of kⁿ, and proves basic properties about this map.
To get 𝕍 in VS Code, type `\bbV`.
Note: we never assume that the number of variables is finite,
so actually instead of using a natural number n, we use an
arbitrary set n for our variables.
All the definitions work for k a commutative ring, but not all
of the the theorems do. However, computer scientists want us to set
up the theory in as much generality as possible, and I believe that
mathematicians should learn to think more like computer scientists.
So k starts off being a commutative ring, and occasionally changes later.
## Lean 3 notation: important comments.
Because we're not using Lean 4, we will have to deal with some
awkward notational issues.
* the multivariable polynomial ring k[X₁,X₂,…,Xₙ] is denoted
`mv_polynomial n k`.
* The set kⁿ is denoted
`n → k`.
(note: this means maps from n to k, and if you're thinking
about n as {1,2,3,...,n} then you can see that this makes sense).
* subsets of a set X are denoted
`set X`
* The subset of X which is all of X is not called X :-) It's called
`univ`
* To evaluate a polynomial f on a vector x, we write
`eval x f`
Note the order! "Maps on the right".
## Important definitions
* `𝕍 : set (mv_polynomial n k) → set (n → k)`
sending a subset S of k[X₁,X₂,…Xₙ] to the subset of kⁿ cut out
by the zeros of all the elements of S.
## References
Martin Orr's lecture notes at
https://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/Martin.Orr/2017-8/alg-geom/
## Tags
algebraic geometry, algebraic variety, 𝕍
-/
-- code starts here
-- We're dealing with multivariable polynomials so let's open the
-- namespace to get easy access to all the functions
open mv_polynomial
-- let k be a commutative ring
variables {k : Type*} [comm_ring k]
-- and let n be any set, but pretend it's {1,2,...,n} with n a natural number.
-- We'll work with polynomials in variables X_i for i ∈ n.
variable {n : Type*}
/- recall:
Maths Lean 3
---------------------------------------
k[X₁, X₂, ..., Xₙ] mv_polynomial n k
kⁿ n → k
subsets of X set X
the subset X of X univ
f(x) eval x f
-/
/-- 𝕍 : the function sending a subset S of k[X₁,X₂,…Xₙ] to
the subset of kⁿ defined as the intersection of the zeros of all
the elements of S. For more details, see Martin Orr's notes -/
def 𝕍 (S : set (mv_polynomial n k)) : set (n → k) :=
{x : n → k | ∀ f ∈ S, eval x f = 0}
-- Now let's prove a bunch of theorems about 𝕍, in a namespace
namespace affine_algebraic_set
-- the theorems will be about sets, so let's open the set namespace
-- giving us easier access to theorems about sets
open set
-- The following lemma has a trivial proof so don't worry about it.
/-- x ∈ 𝕍 S ↔ for all f ∈ S, f(x) = 0. This is true by definition. -/
lemma mem_𝕍_iff {S : set (mv_polynomial n k)} {x : n → k} :
x ∈ 𝕍 S ↔ ∀ f ∈ S, eval x f = 0 := iff.rfl
-- The rest of the proofs in this file are supposed to be comprehensible
-- to mathematicians
/-- 𝕍(∅) = kⁿ -/
lemma 𝕍_empty : 𝕍 (∅ : set (mv_polynomial n k)) = univ :=
begin
-- We need to show that for all x in kⁿ, x ∈ 𝕍 ∅
rw eq_univ_iff_forall,
-- so say x ∈ kⁿ.
intro x,
-- By definition of 𝕍, we need to check that f(x) = 0 for all f in ∅
rw mem_𝕍_iff,
-- so say f is a polynomial
intro f,
-- and f is in the empty set
intro hf,
-- well, our assumptions give a contradiction,
-- and we can deduce anything from a contradiction
cases hf,
end
/-- Over a non-zero commutative ring, 𝕍 (k[X₁,X₂,…,Xₙ]) = ∅ -/
lemma 𝕍_univ {k : Type*} [nonzero_comm_ring k] {n : Type*} :
𝕍 (univ : set (mv_polynomial n k)) = ∅ :=
begin
-- It suffices to show that for all x ∈ kⁿ, x isn't in 𝕍 (all polynomials)
rw eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
-- so say x ∈ kⁿ
intro x,
-- we need to check that it's not true that for every polynomial f, f(x) = 0
rw mem_𝕍_iff,
-- so let's assume that f(x) = 0 for every polynomial f,
intro h,
-- and get a contradiction (note that the goal is now `false`).
-- Let's consider the constant polynomial 1; we deduce 1(x) = 0.
replace h := h (C 1) (mem_univ _),
-- evaluating 1 at x gives the value 1
rw eval_C at h,
-- so 1 = 0 in k, which contradicts k being non-zero
exact zero_ne_one h.symm
end
/-- 𝕍({0}) = kⁿ -/
lemma 𝕍_zero : 𝕍 ({0} : set (mv_polynomial n k)) = univ :=
begin
-- It suffices to prove every element of kⁿ is in 𝕍(0)
rw eq_univ_iff_forall,
-- so say x ∈ kⁿ
intro x,
-- To prove it's in V(0), we need to show f(x)=0 for all f in {0}
rw mem_𝕍_iff,
-- so take f in {0}
intros f hf,
-- Then it's zero!
rw mem_singleton_iff at hf,
-- so we have to prove 0(x) = 0
rw hf,
-- which is obvious
refl,
end
/-- If k ≠ 0 then 𝕍({1}) = ∅ -/
lemma 𝕍_one {k : Type*} [nonzero_comm_ring k] {n : Type*} :
𝕍 ({1} : set (mv_polynomial n k)) = ∅ :=
begin
-- this is basically the same proof as 𝕍_univ
-- It suffices to show that for all x ∈ kⁿ, x isn't in 𝕍 ({1})
rw eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
-- so say x ∈ kⁿ
intro x,
-- we need to check that it's not true that for all f ∈ {1}, f(x) = 0
rw mem_𝕍_iff,
-- so let's assume that f(x) = 0 for every polynomial f in {1},
intro h,
-- and get a contradiction (note that the goal is now `false`).
-- Setting f = 1, we deduce 1(x) = 0.
replace h := h (C 1) (mem_singleton _),
-- evaluating the polynomial 1 at x gives the value 1
rw eval_C at h,
-- so 1 = 0 in k, which contradicts k being non-zero
exact zero_ne_one h.symm
end
/-- If S ⊆ T then 𝕍(T) ⊆ 𝕍(S) -/
theorem 𝕍_antimono (S T : set (mv_polynomial n k)) :
S ⊆ T → 𝕍 T ⊆ 𝕍 S :=
begin
-- We are assuming S ⊆ T
intro hST,
-- Let x ∈ 𝕍 T be arbitrary
intros x hx,
-- We want to prove x ∈ 𝕍 S.
-- We know that ∀ t ∈ T, t(x) = 0, and we want to
-- prove that ∀ s ∈ S, s(x) = 0.
rw mem_𝕍_iff at hx ⊢,
-- So say s ∈ S.
intros s hs,
-- we want to prove s(x) = 0.
-- But t(x) = 0 for all t in T, so it suffices to prove s ∈ T
apply hx,
-- and this is clear because S ⊆ T
exact hST hs
end
theorem 𝕍_union (S T : set (mv_polynomial n k)) :
𝕍 (S ∪ T) = 𝕍 S ∩ 𝕍 T :=
begin
-- let's prove this equality of sets by proving ⊆ and ⊇
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{ -- Step 1: we prove the inclusion 𝕍 (S ∪ T) ⊆ 𝕍 S ∩ 𝕍 T.
-- So let x be an element of the LHS
intros x hx,
-- then x ∈ 𝕍 (S ∪ T) so ∀ f ∈ S ∪ T, f(x) = 0. Call this hypothesis `hx`.
rw mem_𝕍_iff at hx,
-- To prove x ∈ 𝕍 S ∩ 𝕍 T, it suffices to prove x ∈ 𝕍 S and x ∈ 𝕍 T
split,
{ -- We deal with the two cases separately.
-- To prove x ∈ 𝕍 S, we need to show that for all f ∈ S, f(x) = 0
rw mem_𝕍_iff,
-- so say f ∈ S
intros f hf,
-- By hypothesis `hx`, it suffices to prove that f ∈ S ∪ T
apply hx,
-- but this is obvious
left, assumption
},
{ -- To prove x ∈ 𝕍 T, the argument is the same,
-- so we write it the way a computer scientist would.
-- (they prefer one incomprehensible line to four simple ones)
exact mem_𝕍_iff.2 (λ f hf, hx _ (set.subset_union_right _ _ hf)),
},
},
{ -- Step 2: we prove the other inclusion.
-- ⊢ 𝕍 S ∩ 𝕍 T ⊆ 𝕍 (S ∪ T) (NB `⊢` means "the goal is")
-- say x is in 𝕍 S and 𝕍 T
rintro x ⟨hxS, hxT⟩,
-- We need to show that for all f ∈ S ∪ T, f(x) = 0
rw mem_𝕍_iff,
-- so choose f in S ∪ T
intros f hf,
-- Well, f is either in S or in T, so there are two cases.
cases hf,
{ -- Say f ∈ S
-- Recall that x ∈ 𝕍 S, so ∀ f ∈ S, f(x) = 0
rw mem_𝕍_iff at hxS,
-- so we're done.
exact hxS f hf
},
{ -- Say f ∈ T
-- The argument is the same so we do it in one step
exact hxT f hf,
}
}
end
-- Infinite (or rather, arbitrary) unions work just the same
-- We consider a collection Sᵢ of subsets indexed by i ∈ I.
theorem 𝕍_Union {I : Type*} (S : I → set (mv_polynomial n k)) :
𝕍 (⋃ i, S i) = ⋂ i, 𝕍 (S i) :=
begin
-- To prove equality of two subsets of kⁿ it suffices to prove ⊆ and ⊇.
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{ -- Goal: 𝕍 (⋃ i, S i) ⊆ ⋂ i, 𝕍 (S i)
-- Let x be in the left hand side
intros x hx,
-- it suffices to prove that for all j, x ∈ 𝕍 (S j)
rw set.mem_Inter,
-- so choose some j ∈ I
intro j,
-- and say f ∈ S j.
intros f hf,
-- We now want to prove f(x) = 0.
-- Now we know x ∈ 𝕍 (⋃ i, S i), so g(x) = 0 for all g in ⋃ i, S i
-- Hence it suffices to prove that f ∈ ⋃ i, S i
apply hx,
-- By definition of the infinite union, it suffices to find
-- some i ∈ I such that f ∈ S i
rw set.mem_Union,
-- and we can use j for this i
use j,
-- and what we need to show is true now by assumption, because f ∈ S j
assumption
},
{ -- Now the other way.
-- ⊢ (⋂ (i : I), 𝕍 (S i)) ⊆ 𝕍 (⋃ (i : I), S i)
-- Say x is in the left hand side
intros x hx,
-- It suffices to show that for all f ∈ ⋃ i, S i, f(x) = 0
rw mem_𝕍_iff,
-- so say f is a polynomial in this union
intros f hf,
-- If f is in the union, then it's in one of the S i, so say f ∈ S j
rw set.mem_Union at hf,
cases hf with j hj,
-- Now we know x is in the intersection of the 𝕍 (S i) for all i,
-- so x ∈ 𝕍 (S j)
rw set.mem_Inter at hx,
have hxj := hx j,
-- and because h(x) = 0 for every element h ∈ S j,
-- and we know f ∈ S j, we deduce f(x) = 0 as required.
exact hxj _ hj
}
end
-- For convenience, let's define multiplication on subsets of k[X₁,X₂,…,Xₙ]
-- in the obvious way: S * T := {s * t | s ∈ S, t ∈ T}.
instance : has_mul (set (mv_polynomial n k)) :=
⟨λ S T, {u | ∃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), u = s * t}⟩
-- For this theorem, we need that k satisfies a * b = 0 => a = 0 or b = 0
theorem 𝕍_mul {k : Type*} [integral_domain k] {n : Type*}
(S T : set (mv_polynomial n k)) :
𝕍 (S * T) = 𝕍 S ∪ 𝕍 T :=
begin
-- to prove that the two sets are equal we will prove ⊆ and ⊇
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{ -- This is the "harder" of the two inclusions;
-- we need to check that if x vanishes on every element of S*T,
-- then x ∈ 𝕍 S or x ∈ 𝕍 T. So let x be in 𝕍 (S * T)
intros x hx,
-- We then know that for every f ∈ S * T, f(x) = 0
rw mem_𝕍_iff at hx,
-- Note for logicians: in this proof, we will assume
-- the law of the excluded middle.
classical,
-- If x ∈ 𝕍 S then the result is easy...
by_cases hx2 : x ∈ 𝕍 S,
-- because 𝕍 S ⊆ 𝕍 S ∪ 𝕍 T
exact subset_union_left _ _ hx2,
-- ...so we can assume assume x ∉ 𝕍 S,
-- and hence that there's s ∈ S such that s(x) ≠ 0
rw mem_𝕍_iff at hx2, push_neg at hx2, rcases hx2 with ⟨s, hs, hsx⟩,
-- we now show x ∈ 𝕍 T,
right,
-- i.e., that for all t ∈ T we have t(x) = 0
rw mem_𝕍_iff,
-- So say t ∈ T
intros t ht,
-- We want to prove that t(x) = 0.
-- Now by assumption, x vanishes on s * t.
replace hx := hx (s * t) ⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩,
-- so s(x) * t(x) = 0
rw eval_mul at hx,
-- so either s(x) or t(x) = 0,
cases mul_eq_zero.1 hx with hxs hxt,
-- So the case s(x) = 0 is a contradiction
contradiction,
-- and t(x) = 0 is what we wanted to prove
assumption
},
{ -- Here's the easier of the two inclusions.
-- say x ∈ 𝕍 S ∪ 𝕍 T,
intros x hx,
-- it's either in 𝕍 S or 𝕍 T.
cases hx with hxS hxT,
{ -- Say x ∈ 𝕍 S.
-- We know that x vanishes at every element of S.
rw mem_𝕍_iff at hxS,
-- We want to prove x vanishes at every polynomial of the form s * t
-- with s ∈ S and t ∈ T.
rw mem_𝕍_iff,
-- so let's take a polynomial of the form s * t
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩,
-- we need to show st(x)=0. So it suffices to show s(x)*t(x)=0
rw eval_mul,
-- Because x ∈ 𝕍 S, we have s(x)=0.
replace hxS := hxS s hs,
-- so it suffices to show 0 * t(x) = 0
rw hxS,
-- but this is obvious
apply zero_mul,
},
{ -- This is the case x ∈ 𝕍 T and it's of course completely analogous.
-- If I knew more about Lean's `WLOG` tactic I might not have to do
-- this case. I'll just do it the computer science way (i.e., a proof
-- which is quick to write but harder for a human to understand)
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩,
rw [eval_mul, hxT t ht, mul_zero],
}
}
end
/-- 𝕍(S) equals 𝕍(<S>), where <S> denotes the
ideal of k[X₁,…,Xₙ] spanned by S. -/
theorem 𝕍_span (S : set (mv_polynomial n k)) : 𝕍 S = 𝕍 (ideal.span S) :=
begin
-- Let's prove ⊆ and ⊇
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{ -- This way is the tricky way
-- We need to prove 𝕍(S) ⊆ 𝕍(<S>), and we prove
-- this by induction on the ideal <S>.
-- Say x ∈ 𝕍(S)
intros x hx,
-- We need to prove that f(x) = 0 for all f in <S>
rw mem_𝕍_iff,
-- so say f ∈ <S>
intros f hf,
-- Apply the principle of induction for ideals.
apply submodule.span_induction hf,
-- We now have four goals!
{
-- first goal -- check that if g ∈ S then g(x) = 0
intros g hg,
-- this follows because x ∈ 𝕍(S)
exact hx _ hg,
},
{ -- second goal -- check that if g = 0 then g(x) = 0
-- this is true by definition
refl
},
{ -- third goal -- check that if g(x) = 0 and h(x) = 0
-- then (g+h)(x) = 0
intros g h hg hh,
-- This is easy because (g+h)(x)=g(x)+h(x)
rw eval_add,
-- and 0 + 0 = 0
rw [hg, hh, zero_add],
},
{ -- finally, say g(x) = 0 and r ∈ k[X₁,…,Xₙ]
intros r g hg,
-- Need to check (r*g)(x) = 0
rw smul_eq_mul,
-- i.e. that r(x)*g(x)=0
rw eval_mul,
-- but g(x)=0
rw hg,
-- so this is obvious
exact mul_zero _,
}
},
{ -- The fact that 𝕍(<S>) ⊆ 𝕍(S) follows from 𝕍_antimono and
-- the fact that S ⊆ <S>
apply 𝕍_antimono,
exact ideal.subset_span,
}
end
/-- If I is an ideal of k[X₁,…,Xₙ] then 𝕍(I)=𝕍(√I), where √I is
the radical of I -/
theorem 𝕍_radical' {k : Type*} [integral_domain k] {n : Type*}
(I : ideal (mv_polynomial n k)) :
𝕍 (↑I : set (mv_polynomial n k)) = 𝕍 (↑(ideal.radical I) : set _) :=
begin
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{ -- this is the slightly trickier direction;
-- we want to prove 𝕍(I) ⊆ 𝕍(√I). So say x ∈ 𝕍(I).
intros x hx,
rw mem_𝕍_iff,
intro f,
intro hf,
cases hf with n hfn,
rw mem_𝕍_iff at hx,
replace hx := hx _ hfn,
rw eval_pow at hx,
exact pow_eq_zero hx,
},
{ -- this is the easy way
apply 𝕍_antimono,
apply ideal.le_radical,
}
end
end affine_algebraic_set
-- Pedantic exercise: we assumed a * b = 0 => a = 0 or b = 0. Give an
-- example of a commutative ring with that property which is not an
-- integral domain. Is the theorem still true for this ring?
-- Questions or comments? You can often find me on the Lean chat
-- at https://leanprover.zulipchat.com (login required,
-- real names preferred, be nice)
-- Prove a theorem. Write a function. xenaproject.wordpress.com
|
f0e4d17a1270f4053d093d85a5c376818aa7deae | 27a31d06bcfc7c5d379fd04a08a9f5ed3f5302d4 | /stage0/src/Init/Data/List/Basic.lean | 9c55aef4a6e3acd01f8cd3f9c75fd9103b6c5b3d | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | joehendrix/lean4 | 0d1486945f7ca9fe225070374338f4f7e74bab03 | 1221bdd3c7d5395baa451ce8fdd2c2f8a00cbc8f | refs/heads/master | 1,640,573,727,861 | 1,639,662,710,000 | 1,639,665,515,000 | 198,893,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,564,084,645,000 | 1,564,084,644,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,471 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.SimpLemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
open Decidable List
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
namespace List
theorem length_add_eq_lengthTRAux (as : List α) (n : Nat) : as.length + n = as.lengthTRAux n := by
induction as generalizing n with
| nil => simp [length, lengthTRAux]
| cons a as ih =>
simp [length, lengthTRAux, ← ih, Nat.succ_add]
rfl
@[csimp] theorem length_eq_lenghtTR : @List.length = @List.lengthTR := by
apply funext; intro α; apply funext; intro as
simp [lengthTR, ← length_add_eq_lengthTRAux]
@[simp] theorem length_nil : length ([] : List α) = 0 :=
rfl
def reverseAux : List α → List α → List α
| [], r => r
| a::l, r => reverseAux l (a::r)
def reverse (as : List α) :List α :=
reverseAux as []
theorem reverseAux_reverseAux_nil (as bs : List α) : reverseAux (reverseAux as bs) [] = reverseAux bs as := by
induction as generalizing bs with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as ih => simp [reverseAux, ih]
theorem reverseAux_reverseAux (as bs cs : List α) : reverseAux (reverseAux as bs) cs = reverseAux bs (reverseAux (reverseAux as []) cs) := by
induction as generalizing bs cs with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as ih => simp [reverseAux, ih (a::bs), ih [a]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (as : List α) : as.reverse.reverse = as := by
simp [reverse]; rw [reverseAux_reverseAux_nil]; rfl
protected def append : List α → List α → List α
| [], bs => bs
| a::as, bs => a :: List.append as bs
def appendTR (as bs : List α) : List α :=
reverseAux as.reverse bs
@[csimp] theorem append_eq_appendTR : @List.append = @appendTR := by
apply funext; intro α; apply funext; intro as; apply funext; intro bs
simp [appendTR, reverse]
induction as with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as ih =>
simp [reverseAux, List.append, ih, reverseAux_reverseAux]
instance : Append (List α) := ⟨List.append⟩
@[simp] theorem nil_append (as : List α) : [] ++ as = as := rfl
@[simp] theorem append_nil (as : List α) : as ++ [] = as := by
induction as with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as ih =>
simp_all [HAppend.hAppend, Append.append, List.append]
@[simp] theorem cons_append (a : α) (as bs : List α) : (a::as) ++ bs = a::(as ++ bs) := rfl
theorem append_assoc (as bs cs : List α) : (as ++ bs) ++ cs = as ++ (bs ++ cs) := by
induction as with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as ih => simp [ih]
instance : EmptyCollection (List α) := ⟨List.nil⟩
protected def erase {α} [BEq α] : List α → α → List α
| [], b => []
| a::as, b => match a == b with
| true => as
| false => a :: List.erase as b
def eraseIdx : List α → Nat → List α
| [], _ => []
| a::as, 0 => as
| a::as, n+1 => a :: eraseIdx as n
def isEmpty : List α → Bool
| [] => true
| _ :: _ => false
@[specialize] def map (f : α → β) : List α → List β
| [] => []
| a::as => f a :: map f as
@[specialize] def mapTRAux (f : α → β) : List α → List β → List β
| [], bs => bs.reverse
| a::as, bs => mapTRAux f as (f a :: bs)
@[inline] def mapTR (f : α → β) (as : List α) : List β :=
mapTRAux f as []
theorem reverseAux_eq_append (as bs : List α) : reverseAux as bs = reverseAux as [] ++ bs := by
induction as generalizing bs with
| nil => simp [reverseAux]
| cons a as ih =>
simp [reverseAux]
rw [ih (a :: bs), ih [a], append_assoc]
rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_nil : reverse ([] : List α) = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_cons (a : α) (as : List α) : reverse (a :: as) = reverse as ++ [a] := by
simp [reverse, reverseAux]
rw [← reverseAux_eq_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_append (as bs : List α) : (as ++ bs).reverse = bs.reverse ++ as.reverse := by
induction as generalizing bs with
| nil => simp
| cons a as ih => simp [ih]; rw [append_assoc]
theorem mapTRAux_eq (f : α → β) (as : List α) (bs : List β) : mapTRAux f as bs = bs.reverse ++ map f as := by
induction as generalizing bs with
| nil => simp [mapTRAux, map]
| cons a as ih =>
simp [mapTRAux, map]
rw [ih (f a :: bs), reverse_cons, append_assoc]
rfl
@[csimp] theorem map_eq_mapTR : @map = @mapTR := by
apply funext; intro α; apply funext; intro β; apply funext; intro f; apply funext; intro as
simp [mapTR, mapTRAux_eq]
@[specialize] def map₂ (f : α → β → γ) : List α → List β → List γ
| [], _ => []
| _, [] => []
| a::as, b::bs => f a b :: map₂ f as bs
def join : List (List α) → List α
| [] => []
| a :: as => a ++ join as
@[specialize] def filterMap (f : α → Option β) : List α → List β
| [] => []
| a::as =>
match f a with
| none => filterMap f as
| some b => b :: filterMap f as
@[specialize] def filterAux (p : α → Bool) : List α → List α → List α
| [], rs => rs.reverse
| a::as, rs => match p a with
| true => filterAux p as (a::rs)
| false => filterAux p as rs
@[inline] def filter (p : α → Bool) (as : List α) : List α :=
filterAux p as []
@[specialize] def partitionAux (p : α → Bool) : List α → List α × List α → List α × List α
| [], (bs, cs) => (bs.reverse, cs.reverse)
| a::as, (bs, cs) =>
match p a with
| true => partitionAux p as (a::bs, cs)
| false => partitionAux p as (bs, a::cs)
@[inline] def partition (p : α → Bool) (as : List α) : List α × List α :=
partitionAux p as ([], [])
def dropWhile (p : α → Bool) : List α → List α
| [] => []
| a::l => match p a with
| true => dropWhile p l
| false => a::l
def find? (p : α → Bool) : List α → Option α
| [] => none
| a::as => match p a with
| true => some a
| false => find? p as
def findSome? (f : α → Option β) : List α → Option β
| [] => none
| a::as => match f a with
| some b => some b
| none => findSome? f as
def replace [BEq α] : List α → α → α → List α
| [], _, _ => []
| a::as, b, c => match a == b with
| true => c::as
| false => a :: (replace as b c)
def elem [BEq α] (a : α) : List α → Bool
| [] => false
| b::bs => match a == b with
| true => true
| false => elem a bs
def notElem [BEq α] (a : α) (as : List α) : Bool :=
!(as.elem a)
abbrev contains [BEq α] (as : List α) (a : α) : Bool :=
elem a as
def eraseDupsAux {α} [BEq α] : List α → List α → List α
| [], bs => bs.reverse
| a::as, bs => match bs.elem a with
| true => eraseDupsAux as bs
| false => eraseDupsAux as (a::bs)
def eraseDups {α} [BEq α] (as : List α) : List α :=
eraseDupsAux as []
def eraseRepsAux {α} [BEq α] : α → List α → List α → List α
| a, [], rs => (a::rs).reverse
| a, a'::as, rs => match a == a' with
| true => eraseRepsAux a as rs
| false => eraseRepsAux a' as (a::rs)
/-- Erase repeated adjacent elements. -/
def eraseReps {α} [BEq α] : List α → List α
| [] => []
| a::as => eraseRepsAux a as []
@[specialize] def spanAux (p : α → Bool) : List α → List α → List α × List α
| [], rs => (rs.reverse, [])
| a::as, rs => match p a with
| true => spanAux p as (a::rs)
| false => (rs.reverse, a::as)
@[inline] def span (p : α → Bool) (as : List α) : List α × List α :=
spanAux p as []
@[specialize] def groupByAux (eq : α → α → Bool) : List α → List (List α) → List (List α)
| a::as, (ag::g)::gs => match eq a ag with
| true => groupByAux eq as ((a::ag::g)::gs)
| false => groupByAux eq as ([a]::(ag::g).reverse::gs)
| _, gs => gs.reverse
@[specialize] def groupBy (p : α → α → Bool) : List α → List (List α)
| [] => []
| a::as => groupByAux p as [[a]]
def lookup [BEq α] : α → List (α × β) → Option β
| _, [] => none
| a, (k,b)::es => match a == k with
| true => some b
| false => lookup a es
def removeAll [BEq α] (xs ys : List α) : List α :=
xs.filter (fun x => ys.notElem x)
def drop : Nat → List α → List α
| 0, a => a
| n+1, [] => []
| n+1, a::as => drop n as
def take : Nat → List α → List α
| 0, a => []
| n+1, [] => []
| n+1, a::as => a :: take n as
def takeWhile (p : α → Bool) : List α → List α
| [] => []
| hd :: tl => match p hd with
| true => hd :: takeWhile p tl
| false => []
@[specialize] def foldr (f : α → β → β) (init : β) : List α → β
| [] => init
| a :: l => f a (foldr f init l)
@[inline] def any (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) : Bool :=
foldr (fun a r => p a || r) false l
@[inline] def all (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) : Bool :=
foldr (fun a r => p a && r) true l
def or (bs : List Bool) : Bool := bs.any id
def and (bs : List Bool) : Bool := bs.all id
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) : List α → List β → List γ
| x::xs, y::ys => f x y :: zipWith f xs ys
| _, _ => []
def zip : List α → List β → List (Prod α β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
def unzip : List (α × β) → List α × List β
| [] => ([], [])
| (a, b) :: t => match unzip t with | (al, bl) => (a::al, b::bl)
def rangeAux : Nat → List Nat → List Nat
| 0, ns => ns
| n+1, ns => rangeAux n (n::ns)
def range (n : Nat) : List Nat :=
rangeAux n []
def iota : Nat → List Nat
| 0 => []
| m@(n+1) => m :: iota n
def enumFrom : Nat → List α → List (Nat × α)
| n, [] => nil
| n, x :: xs => (n, x) :: enumFrom (n + 1) xs
def enum : List α → List (Nat × α) := enumFrom 0
def init : List α → List α
| [] => []
| [a] => []
| a::l => a::init l
def intersperse (sep : α) : List α → List α
| [] => []
| [x] => [x]
| x::xs => x :: sep :: intersperse sep xs
def intercalate (sep : List α) (xs : List (List α)) : List α :=
join (intersperse sep xs)
@[inline] protected def bind {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (a : List α) (b : α → List β) : List β := join (map b a)
@[inline] protected def pure {α : Type u} (a : α) : List α := [a]
inductive lt [LT α] : List α → List α → Prop where
| nil (b : α) (bs : List α) : lt [] (b::bs)
| head {a : α} (as : List α) {b : α} (bs : List α) : a < b → lt (a::as) (b::bs)
| tail {a : α} {as : List α} {b : α} {bs : List α} : ¬ a < b → ¬ b < a → lt as bs → lt (a::as) (b::bs)
instance [LT α] : LT (List α) := ⟨List.lt⟩
instance hasDecidableLt [LT α] [h : DecidableRel (α:=α) (·<·)] : (l₁ l₂ : List α) → Decidable (l₁ < l₂)
| [], [] => isFalse (fun h => nomatch h)
| [], b::bs => isTrue (List.lt.nil _ _)
| a::as, [] => isFalse (fun h => nomatch h)
| a::as, b::bs =>
match h a b with
| isTrue h₁ => isTrue (List.lt.head _ _ h₁)
| isFalse h₁ =>
match h b a with
| isTrue h₂ => isFalse (fun h => match h with
| List.lt.head _ _ h₁' => absurd h₁' h₁
| List.lt.tail _ h₂' _ => absurd h₂ h₂')
| isFalse h₂ =>
match hasDecidableLt as bs with
| isTrue h₃ => isTrue (List.lt.tail h₁ h₂ h₃)
| isFalse h₃ => isFalse (fun h => match h with
| List.lt.head _ _ h₁' => absurd h₁' h₁
| List.lt.tail _ _ h₃' => absurd h₃' h₃)
@[reducible] protected def le [LT α] (a b : List α) : Prop := ¬ b < a
instance [LT α] : LE (List α) := ⟨List.le⟩
instance [LT α] [h : DecidableRel ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop)] : (l₁ l₂ : List α) → Decidable (l₁ ≤ l₂) :=
fun a b => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (Not _))
/-- `isPrefixOf l₁ l₂` returns `true` Iff `l₁` is a prefix of `l₂`. -/
def isPrefixOf [BEq α] : List α → List α → Bool
| [], _ => true
| _, [] => false
| a::as, b::bs => a == b && isPrefixOf as bs
/-- `isSuffixOf l₁ l₂` returns `true` Iff `l₁` is a suffix of `l₂`. -/
def isSuffixOf [BEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Bool :=
isPrefixOf l₁.reverse l₂.reverse
@[specialize] def isEqv : List α → List α → (α → α → Bool) → Bool
| [], [], _ => true
| a::as, b::bs, eqv => eqv a b && isEqv as bs eqv
| _, _, eqv => false
protected def beq [BEq α] : List α → List α → Bool
| [], [] => true
| a::as, b::bs => a == b && List.beq as bs
| _, _ => false
instance [BEq α] : BEq (List α) := ⟨List.beq⟩
def replicate {α : Type u} (n : Nat) (a : α) : List α :=
let rec loop : Nat → List α → List α
| 0, as => as
| n+1, as => loop n (a::as)
loop n []
def dropLast {α} : List α → List α
| [] => []
| [a] => []
| a::as => a :: dropLast as
@[simp] theorem length_replicate (n : Nat) (a : α) : (replicate n a).length = n :=
let rec aux (n : Nat) (as : List α) : (replicate.loop a n as).length = n + as.length := by
induction n generalizing as with
| zero => simp [replicate.loop]
| succ n ih => simp [replicate.loop, ih, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_succ]
aux n []
@[simp] theorem length_concat (as : List α) (a : α) : (concat as a).length = as.length + 1 := by
induction as with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs ih => simp [concat, ih]
@[simp] theorem length_set (as : List α) (i : Nat) (a : α) : (as.set i a).length = as.length := by
induction as generalizing i with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs ih =>
cases i with
| zero => rfl
| succ i => simp [set, ih]
@[simp] theorem length_dropLast (as : List α) : as.dropLast.length = as.length - 1 := by
match as with
| [] => rfl
| [a] => rfl
| a::b::as =>
have ih := length_dropLast (b::as)
simp[dropLast, ih]
rfl
@[simp] theorem length_append (as bs : List α) : (as ++ bs).length = as.length + bs.length := by
induction as with
| nil => simp
| cons a as ih => simp [ih, Nat.succ_add]
@[simp] theorem length_reverse (as : List α) : (as.reverse).length = as.length := by
induction as with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as ih => simp [ih]
def maximum? [LT α] [DecidableRel (@LT.lt α _)] : List α → Option α
| [] => none
| a::as => some <| as.foldl max a
def minimum? [LE α] [DecidableRel (@LE.le α _)] : List α → Option α
| [] => none
| a::as => some <| as.foldl min a
end List
|
7ec593f405444cfed4c3df7d0cd372f13f61c739 | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/tactic/library_note.lean | 4800b4b5aeac422e01be59351f65cac87767db7c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,394 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
/-!
# Library notes
At various places in mathlib, we leave implementation notes that are referenced from many other
files. To keep track of these notes, we use the command `library_note`. This makes it easy to
retrieve a list of all notes, e.g. for documentation output.
An example from `meta.expr`:
```
library_note "open expressions"
"Some declarations work with open expressions, i.e. an expr that has free variables.
Terms will free variables are not well-typed, and one should not use them in tactics like
`infer_type` or `unify`. You can still do syntactic analysis/manipulation on them.
The reason for working with open types is for performance: instantiating variables requires
iterating through the expression. In one performance test `pi_binders` was more than 6x
quicker than `mk_local_pis` (when applied to the type of all imported declarations 100x)."
```
These notes can be referenced in mathlib with the syntax `Note [note id]`.
Often, these references will be made in code comments (`--`) that won't be displayed in docs.
If such a reference is made in a doc string or module doc, it will be linked to the corresponding
note in the doc display.
Since these notes are used in files imported by `tactic.core`, this file has no imports.
## Implementation details
`library_note note_id note_msg` creates a declaration `` `library_note.i `` for some `i`.
This declaration is a pair of strings `note_id` and `note_msg`, and it gets tagged with the
`library_note` attribute.
-/
/-- A rudimentary hash function on strings. -/
def string.hash (s : string) : ℕ :=
s.fold 1 (λ h c, (33*h + c.val) % unsigned_sz)
/-- A user attribute `library_note` for tagging decls of type `string × string` for use in note output. -/
@[user_attribute] meta def library_note_attr : user_attribute :=
{ name := `library_note,
descr := "Notes about library features to be included in documentation" }
open tactic
/-- Creates a name to store `note_id`. -/
private meta def get_name_for (note_id : string) : name :=
`library_note <.> ("_" ++ to_string note_id.hash)
/-- If `note_name` and `note` are `pexpr`s representing strings,
`add_library_note note_name note` adds a declaration of type `string × string` and tags it with
the `library_note` attribute. -/
meta def tactic.add_library_note (note_name note : pexpr) : tactic unit :=
do note_name ← to_expr note_name,
note ← to_expr note,
let decl_name := get_name_for (to_string note_name),
body ← to_expr ``((%%note_name, %%note) : string × string),
add_decl $ mk_definition decl_name [] `(string × string) body,
library_note_attr.set decl_name () tt none
open lean lean.parser interactive
/-- A command to add library notes. Syntax:
```
library_note "note id" "note content"
``` -/
@[user_command] meta def library_note (_ : parse (tk "library_note")) : parser unit :=
do name ← parser.pexpr,
note ← parser.pexpr,
of_tactic $ tactic.add_library_note name note
/-- Collects all notes in the current environment. Returns a list of pairs `(note_id, note_content)` -/
meta def tactic.get_library_notes : tactic (list (string × string)) :=
attribute.get_instances `library_note >>= list.mmap (λ dcl, mk_const dcl >>= eval_expr (string × string))
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.