blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
392d2df7e9043d08cda1c6419ba451dccaf6711b | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /test/mod_implicit.lean | 255dd812a725181ed797778f2bf6a6321b6df71f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 540 | lean | import tactic.interactive
import data.nat.basic
variables (p : ℕ → Prop) (a b : ℕ)
example (h : p (a + b)) : p (b + a) :=
begin
rw add_comm,
-- `guard_target` fails because the instances don't match
success_if_fail { guard_target p (a + b) },
guard_target_mod_implicit p (a + b),
assumption
end
example (h : p (b + a)) : p (a + b) :=
begin
rw add_comm at h,
-- `guard_hyp` fails because the instances don't match
success_if_fail { guard_hyp h : p (a + b) },
guard_hyp_mod_implicit h : p (a + b),
assumption
end
|
8147824ec2e465a89f06b3b769385846f1cda1d7 | 27a31d06bcfc7c5d379fd04a08a9f5ed3f5302d4 | /stage0/src/Lean/Elab/PreDefinition/Basic.lean | 3e0ce92a6aae11057f86e8c53190fece409b9228 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | joehendrix/lean4 | 0d1486945f7ca9fe225070374338f4f7e74bab03 | 1221bdd3c7d5395baa451ce8fdd2c2f8a00cbc8f | refs/heads/master | 1,640,573,727,861 | 1,639,662,710,000 | 1,639,665,515,000 | 198,893,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,564,084,645,000 | 1,564,084,644,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,235 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Util.SCC
import Lean.Meta.AbstractNestedProofs
import Lean.Elab.Term
import Lean.Elab.DefView
import Lean.Elab.PreDefinition.MkInhabitant
namespace Lean.Elab
open Meta
open Term
/--
A (potentially recursive) definition.
The elaborator converts it into Kernel definitions using many different strategies.
-/
structure PreDefinition where
ref : Syntax
kind : DefKind
levelParams : List Name
modifiers : Modifiers
declName : Name
type : Expr
value : Expr
deriving Inhabited
def instantiateMVarsAtPreDecls (preDefs : Array PreDefinition) : TermElabM (Array PreDefinition) :=
preDefs.mapM fun preDef => do
pure { preDef with type := (← instantiateMVars preDef.type), value := (← instantiateMVars preDef.value) }
private def levelMVarToParamPreDeclsAux (preDefs : Array PreDefinition) : StateRefT Nat TermElabM (Array PreDefinition) :=
preDefs.mapM fun preDef => do
pure { preDef with type := (← levelMVarToParam' preDef.type), value := (← levelMVarToParam' preDef.value) }
def levelMVarToParamPreDecls (preDefs : Array PreDefinition) : TermElabM (Array PreDefinition) :=
(levelMVarToParamPreDeclsAux preDefs).run' 1
private def getLevelParamsPreDecls (preDefs : Array PreDefinition) (scopeLevelNames allUserLevelNames : List Name) : TermElabM (List Name) := do
let mut s : CollectLevelParams.State := {}
for preDef in preDefs do
s := collectLevelParams s preDef.type
s := collectLevelParams s preDef.value
match sortDeclLevelParams scopeLevelNames allUserLevelNames s.params with
| Except.error msg => throwError msg
| Except.ok levelParams => pure levelParams
def fixLevelParams (preDefs : Array PreDefinition) (scopeLevelNames allUserLevelNames : List Name) : TermElabM (Array PreDefinition) := do
-- We used to use `shareCommon` here, but is was a bottleneck
let levelParams ← getLevelParamsPreDecls preDefs scopeLevelNames allUserLevelNames
let us := levelParams.map mkLevelParam
let fixExpr (e : Expr) : Expr :=
e.replace fun c => match c with
| Expr.const declName _ _ => if preDefs.any fun preDef => preDef.declName == declName then some $ Lean.mkConst declName us else none
| _ => none
pure $ preDefs.map fun preDef =>
{ preDef with
type := fixExpr preDef.type,
value := fixExpr preDef.value,
levelParams := levelParams }
def applyAttributesOf (preDefs : Array PreDefinition) (applicationTime : AttributeApplicationTime) : TermElabM Unit := do
for preDef in preDefs do
applyAttributesAt preDef.declName preDef.modifiers.attrs applicationTime
def abstractNestedProofs (preDef : PreDefinition) : MetaM PreDefinition :=
if preDef.kind.isTheorem || preDef.kind.isExample then
pure preDef
else do
let value ← Meta.abstractNestedProofs preDef.declName preDef.value
pure { preDef with value := value }
/- Auxiliary method for (temporarily) adding pre definition as an axiom -/
def addAsAxiom (preDef : PreDefinition) : MetaM Unit := do
withRef preDef.ref do
addDecl <| Declaration.axiomDecl { name := preDef.declName, levelParams := preDef.levelParams, type := preDef.type, isUnsafe := preDef.modifiers.isUnsafe }
private def shouldGenCodeFor (preDef : PreDefinition) : Bool :=
!preDef.kind.isTheorem && !preDef.modifiers.isNoncomputable
private def compileDecl (decl : Declaration) : TermElabM Bool := do
try
Lean.compileDecl decl
catch ex =>
if (← read).isNoncomputableSection then
return false
else
throw ex
return true
private def addNonRecAux (preDef : PreDefinition) (compile : Bool) : TermElabM Unit :=
withRef preDef.ref do
let preDef ← abstractNestedProofs preDef
let env ← getEnv
let decl :=
match preDef.kind with
| DefKind.«theorem» =>
Declaration.thmDecl { name := preDef.declName, levelParams := preDef.levelParams, type := preDef.type, value := preDef.value }
| DefKind.«opaque» =>
Declaration.opaqueDecl { name := preDef.declName, levelParams := preDef.levelParams, type := preDef.type, value := preDef.value,
isUnsafe := preDef.modifiers.isUnsafe }
| DefKind.«abbrev» =>
Declaration.defnDecl { name := preDef.declName, levelParams := preDef.levelParams, type := preDef.type, value := preDef.value,
hints := ReducibilityHints.«abbrev»,
safety := if preDef.modifiers.isUnsafe then DefinitionSafety.unsafe else DefinitionSafety.safe }
| _ => -- definitions and examples
Declaration.defnDecl { name := preDef.declName, levelParams := preDef.levelParams, type := preDef.type, value := preDef.value,
hints := ReducibilityHints.regular (getMaxHeight env preDef.value + 1),
safety := if preDef.modifiers.isUnsafe then DefinitionSafety.unsafe else DefinitionSafety.safe }
addDecl decl
withSaveInfoContext do -- save new env
addTermInfo preDef.ref (← mkConstWithLevelParams preDef.declName) (isBinder := true)
applyAttributesOf #[preDef] AttributeApplicationTime.afterTypeChecking
if compile && shouldGenCodeFor preDef then
unless (← compileDecl decl) do
return ()
applyAttributesOf #[preDef] AttributeApplicationTime.afterCompilation
def addAndCompileNonRec (preDef : PreDefinition) : TermElabM Unit := do
addNonRecAux preDef true
def addNonRec (preDef : PreDefinition) : TermElabM Unit := do
addNonRecAux preDef false
def addAndCompileUnsafe (preDefs : Array PreDefinition) (safety := DefinitionSafety.unsafe) : TermElabM Unit :=
withRef preDefs[0].ref do
let decl := Declaration.mutualDefnDecl $ preDefs.toList.map fun preDef => {
name := preDef.declName
levelParams := preDef.levelParams
type := preDef.type
value := preDef.value
safety := safety
hints := ReducibilityHints.opaque
}
addDecl decl
withSaveInfoContext do -- save new env
for preDef in preDefs do
addTermInfo preDef.ref (← mkConstWithLevelParams preDef.declName) (isBinder := true)
applyAttributesOf preDefs AttributeApplicationTime.afterTypeChecking
unless (← compileDecl decl) do
return ()
applyAttributesOf preDefs AttributeApplicationTime.afterCompilation
return ()
def addAndCompilePartialRec (preDefs : Array PreDefinition) : TermElabM Unit := do
if preDefs.all shouldGenCodeFor then
addAndCompileUnsafe (safety := DefinitionSafety.partial) <| preDefs.map fun preDef =>
{ preDef with
declName := Compiler.mkUnsafeRecName preDef.declName,
value := preDef.value.replace fun e => match e with
| Expr.const declName us _ =>
if preDefs.any fun preDef => preDef.declName == declName then
some $ mkConst (Compiler.mkUnsafeRecName declName) us
else
none
| _ => none,
modifiers := {} }
end Lean.Elab
|
583a218e84aaa5ca022b1e72a574d56c44cbe142 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/data/rat/floor.lean | 48218e3a14fa33f81465e7beae5864a3ec33d896 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,435 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import algebra.floor
import tactic.field_simp
/-!
# Floor Function for Rational Numbers
## Summary
We define the `floor` function and the `floor_ring` instance on `ℚ`. Some technical lemmas relating
`floor` to integer division and modulo arithmetic are derived as well as some simple inequalities.
## Tags
rat, rationals, ℚ, floor
-/
open int
namespace rat
/-- `floor q` is the largest integer `z` such that `z ≤ q` -/
protected def floor : ℚ → ℤ
| ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ := n / d
protected theorem le_floor {z : ℤ} : ∀ {r : ℚ}, z ≤ rat.floor r ↔ (z : ℚ) ≤ r
| ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ := begin
simp [rat.floor],
rw [num_denom'],
have h' := int.coe_nat_lt.2 h,
conv { to_rhs,
rw [coe_int_eq_mk, rat.le_def zero_lt_one h', mul_one] },
exact int.le_div_iff_mul_le h'
end
instance : floor_ring ℚ :=
floor_ring.of_floor ℚ rat.floor $ λ a z, rat.le_floor.symm
protected lemma floor_def {q : ℚ} : ⌊q⌋ = q.num / q.denom := by { cases q, refl }
lemma floor_int_div_nat_eq_div {n : ℤ} {d : ℕ} : ⌊(↑n : ℚ) / (↑d : ℚ)⌋ = n / (↑d : ℤ) :=
begin
rw [rat.floor_def],
cases decidable.em (d = 0) with d_eq_zero d_ne_zero,
{ simp [d_eq_zero] },
{ cases decidable.em (n = 0) with n_eq_zero n_ne_zero,
{ simp [n_eq_zero] },
{ set q := (n : ℚ) / d with q_eq,
obtain ⟨c, n_eq_c_mul_num, d_eq_c_mul_denom⟩ : ∃ c, n = c * q.num ∧ (d : ℤ) = c * q.denom, by
{ rw q_eq,
exact_mod_cast (@rat.exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_denom n d n_ne_zero
(by exact_mod_cast d_ne_zero)) },
suffices : q.num / q.denom = c * q.num / (c * q.denom),
by rwa [n_eq_c_mul_num, d_eq_c_mul_denom],
suffices : c > 0, by solve_by_elim [int.mul_div_mul_of_pos],
have q_denom_mul_c_pos : (0 : ℤ) < q.denom * c, by
{ have : (d : ℤ) > 0, by exact_mod_cast (pos_iff_ne_zero.elim_right d_ne_zero),
rwa [d_eq_c_mul_denom, mul_comm] at this },
suffices : (0 : ℤ) ≤ q.denom, from pos_of_mul_pos_left q_denom_mul_c_pos this,
exact_mod_cast (le_of_lt q.pos) } }
end
end rat
lemma int.mod_nat_eq_sub_mul_floor_rat_div {n : ℤ} {d : ℕ} : n % d = n - d * ⌊(n : ℚ) / d⌋ :=
by rw [(eq_sub_of_add_eq $ int.mod_add_div n d), rat.floor_int_div_nat_eq_div]
lemma nat.coprime_sub_mul_floor_rat_div_of_coprime {n d : ℕ} (n_coprime_d : n.coprime d) :
((n : ℤ) - d * ⌊(n : ℚ)/ d⌋).nat_abs.coprime d :=
begin
have : (n : ℤ) % d = n - d * ⌊(n : ℚ)/ d⌋, from int.mod_nat_eq_sub_mul_floor_rat_div,
rw ←this,
have : d.coprime n, from n_coprime_d.symm,
rwa [nat.coprime, nat.gcd_rec] at this
end
namespace rat
lemma num_lt_succ_floor_mul_denom (q : ℚ) : q.num < (⌊q⌋ + 1) * q.denom :=
begin
suffices : (q.num : ℚ) < (⌊q⌋ + 1) * q.denom, by exact_mod_cast this,
suffices : (q.num : ℚ) < (q - fract q + 1) * q.denom, by
{ have : (⌊q⌋ : ℚ) = q - fract q, from (eq_sub_of_add_eq $ floor_add_fract q),
rwa this },
suffices : (q.num : ℚ) < q.num + (1 - fract q) * q.denom, by
{ have : (q - fract q + 1) * q.denom = q.num + (1 - fract q) * q.denom, calc
(q - fract q + 1) * q.denom = (q + (1 - fract q)) * q.denom : by ring
... = q * q.denom + (1 - fract q) * q.denom : by rw add_mul
... = q.num + (1 - fract q) * q.denom : by simp,
rwa this },
suffices : 0 < (1 - fract q) * q.denom, by { rw ←sub_lt_iff_lt_add', simpa },
have : 0 < 1 - fract q, by
{ have : fract q < 1, from fract_lt_one q,
have : 0 + fract q < 1, by simp [this],
rwa lt_sub_iff_add_lt },
exact mul_pos this (by exact_mod_cast q.pos)
end
lemma fract_inv_num_lt_num_of_pos {q : ℚ} (q_pos : 0 < q): (fract q⁻¹).num < q.num :=
begin
-- we know that the numerator must be positive
have q_num_pos : 0 < q.num, from rat.num_pos_iff_pos.elim_right q_pos,
-- we will work with the absolute value of the numerator, which is equal to the numerator
have q_num_abs_eq_q_num : (q.num.nat_abs : ℤ) = q.num, from
(int.nat_abs_of_nonneg q_num_pos.le),
set q_inv := (q.denom : ℚ) / q.num with q_inv_def,
have q_inv_eq : q⁻¹ = q_inv, from rat.inv_def',
suffices : (q_inv - ⌊q_inv⌋).num < q.num, by rwa q_inv_eq,
suffices : ((q.denom - q.num * ⌊q_inv⌋ : ℚ) / q.num).num < q.num, by
field_simp [this, (ne_of_gt q_num_pos)],
suffices : (q.denom : ℤ) - q.num * ⌊q_inv⌋ < q.num, by
{ -- use that `q.num` and `q.denom` are coprime to show that the numerator stays unreduced
have : ((q.denom - q.num * ⌊q_inv⌋ : ℚ) / q.num).num = q.denom - q.num * ⌊q_inv⌋, by
{ suffices : ((q.denom : ℤ) - q.num * ⌊q_inv⌋).nat_abs.coprime q.num.nat_abs, by
exact_mod_cast (rat.num_div_eq_of_coprime q_num_pos this),
have : (q.num.nat_abs : ℚ) = (q.num : ℚ), by exact_mod_cast q_num_abs_eq_q_num,
have tmp := nat.coprime_sub_mul_floor_rat_div_of_coprime q.cop.symm,
simpa only [this, q_num_abs_eq_q_num] using tmp },
rwa this },
-- to show the claim, start with the following inequality
have q_inv_num_denom_ineq : q⁻¹.num - ⌊q⁻¹⌋ * q⁻¹.denom < q⁻¹.denom, by
{ have : q⁻¹.num < (⌊q⁻¹⌋ + 1) * q⁻¹.denom, from rat.num_lt_succ_floor_mul_denom q⁻¹,
have : q⁻¹.num < ⌊q⁻¹⌋ * q⁻¹.denom + q⁻¹.denom, by rwa [right_distrib, one_mul] at this,
rwa [←sub_lt_iff_lt_add'] at this },
-- use that `q.num` and `q.denom` are coprime to show that q_inv is the unreduced reciprocal
-- of `q`
have : q_inv.num = q.denom ∧ q_inv.denom = q.num.nat_abs, by
{ have coprime_q_denom_q_num : q.denom.coprime q.num.nat_abs, from q.cop.symm,
have : int.nat_abs q.denom = q.denom, by simp,
rw ←this at coprime_q_denom_q_num,
rw q_inv_def,
split,
{ exact_mod_cast (rat.num_div_eq_of_coprime q_num_pos coprime_q_denom_q_num) },
{ suffices : (((q.denom : ℚ) / q.num).denom : ℤ) = q.num.nat_abs, by exact_mod_cast this,
rw q_num_abs_eq_q_num,
exact_mod_cast (rat.denom_div_eq_of_coprime q_num_pos coprime_q_denom_q_num) } },
rwa [q_inv_eq, this.left, this.right, q_num_abs_eq_q_num, mul_comm] at q_inv_num_denom_ineq
end
end rat
|
cbe67305bb5dc8549fcb7340871e661f48b59740 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/lake/test/lock/lakefile.lean | cdc964be56af022d30e8f39584e93b1740c58ccf | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 101 | lean | import Lake
open Lake DSL
package «lock»
lean_lib Loop
lean_lib Nop
lean_lib Error
lean_lib Wait
|
1bd7d70ae2bd6bbae13e9bce32d4898e3843a926 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/1937.lean | d440730148f9cc08ff4bb83f30a65f43a4891990 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,789 | lean | structure BundledFunction (α β : Sort _) :=
(toFun : α → β)
namespace BundledFunction
-- `simp` doesn't seem to unify partial applications of structure projections:
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/.60simp.60.20failing.20on.20partial.20application.20of.20projections
def id (α) : BundledFunction α α := ⟨λ a => a⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_id : (id α).toFun = _root_.id := rfl
example (x : α) : (id α).toFun x = x :=
by simp only [coe_id, id_eq] -- should succeed
example (x : α) : (id α).toFun x = x :=
by rw [coe_id, id_eq] -- succeeds
-- seems to be another instance of the same behaviour:
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/.60simp.60.20calls.20broken.20in.20mathlib4.23922/near/314790371
def otherProjection (f : BundledFunction α β) : α → β := f.toFun
-- Projections functions are expanded when populating the discrimination tree, and are indexed as `Expr.proj` objects.
-- `@toFun α β` cannot be expanded into `Expr.proj` since there is a missing argument. The workaround is to add the missing argument.
-- Then, we get `a.1 = otherProjection a`
@[simp] theorem toFun_eq_otherProjection : @toFun α β a = otherProjection a := rfl
@[simp] theorem id_apply : (id α).otherProjection x = x := rfl
example : (id α).toFun x = x := by simp only [toFun_eq_otherProjection, id_apply]; done -- should work
example : (id α).toFun x = x := by rw [toFun_eq_otherProjection, id_apply] -- succeeds
end BundledFunction
-- `simp` is happy with partial applications in other functions:
def id2 (x : α) := x
@[simp] theorem id2_eq_id : @id2 α = id := rfl
example : id2 x = x := by simp only [id2_eq_id, id_eq] -- works fine
example : id2 x = x := by rw [id2_eq_id, id_eq] -- succeeds
|
51becc2f04a2cda38aafe29bd0c82c675a26d76c | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /src/Init/Data/Stack.lean | 47ab22409b01d44455ccc4ac025b0b1bfa983031 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 197 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Daniel Selsam
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Stack.Basic
|
d87afd3182f11b9d10bc5e7816c13ba18f213fc5 | 590f94277ab689acdc713c44e3bbca2e012fc074 | /Sequent Calculus (Lean)/src/rightRules.lean | 65102e4105fdba46c821736c5a2f51e1bd652824 | [] | no_license | Bpalkmim/iALC | bd3f882ad942c876d65c2d33cb50a36b2f8e5d16 | 9c2982ae916d01d9ebab9d58e0842292ed974876 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,527,062,560 | 1,631,502,537,000 | 1,631,502,537,000 | 108,029,498 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,949 | lean | -- Regras do lado direito do sequente de SCiALC.
-- Autor: Bernardo Alkmim
-- bpalkmim@gmail.com
import .basics
namespace rightRulesSCiALC
open iALCbasics
-- Subjunção
constant subj_r {Δ : list Formula} {α β : Formula} :
Proof (Sequent (α :: Δ) β) → Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.subj α β))
-- Subjunção com nominals
constant subj_r_n {Δ : list Formula} {α β : Formula} {X : Nominal} :
Proof (Sequent (Formula.elemOf X α :: Δ) (Formula.elemOf X β)) → Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.elemOf X (Formula.subj α β)))
-- Conjunção
constant conj_r {Δ : list Formula} {α β : Formula} :
Proof (Sequent Δ α) → Proof (Sequent Δ β) → Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.conj α β))
-- Disjunção (duas regras)
constant disj_r1 {Δ : list Formula} {α : Formula} (β : Formula) :
Proof (Sequent Δ α) → Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.disj α β))
constant disj_r2 {Δ : list Formula} {β : Formula} (α : Formula):
Proof (Sequent Δ β) → Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.disj α β))
-- Disjunção com nominals (duas regras)
constant disj_r1_n {Δ : list Formula} {α : Formula} (β : Formula) (X : Nominal) :
Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.elemOf X α)) → Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.elemOf X (Formula.disj α β)))
constant disj_r2_n {Δ : list Formula} {β : Formula} (α : Formula) (X : Nominal):
Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.elemOf X β)) → Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.elemOf X (Formula.disj α β)))
-- Restrição universal
constant forall_r {Δ : list Formula} {R : Role} {X Y : Nominal} {α : Formula} :
Proof (Sequent (Formula.relation R X Y :: Δ) (Formula.elemOf Y α)) → Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.elemOf X (Formula.univ R α)))
-- Restrição existencial
constant exists_r {Δ : list Formula} {R : Role} {X Y : Nominal} {α : Formula} :
Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.relation R X Y)) → Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.elemOf Y α)) → Proof (Sequent Δ (Formula.elemOf X (Formula.exis R α)))
end rightRulesSCiALC |
f8470379cb531819bcd92bc18985d41dec13b1f4 | 957a80ea22c5abb4f4670b250d55534d9db99108 | /library/init/meta/attribute.lean | 031381a0951be9450b3b28ff8503841d87d5d803 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean | aa1e64d604051e602fcf4610061314b9a37ab8cd | f1ec117a24459b59c6ff9e56a1d09d9e9e60a6c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,202,909,807 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 75,319,626 | 2 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,539,290,164,000 | 1,480,616,104,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,269 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import init.meta.tactic init.meta.rb_map init.meta.has_reflect
meta constant attribute.get_instances : name → tactic (list name)
meta constant attribute.fingerprint : name → tactic nat
meta structure user_attribute :=
(name : name)
(descr : string)
/- Optional handler that will be called after the attribute has been applied to a declaration.
Failing the tactic will fail the entire `attribute/def/...` command, i.e. the attribute will
not be applied after all.
Declaring an `after_set` handler without a `before_unset` handler will make the attribute
non-removable. -/
(after_set : option (Π (decl : _root_.name) (prio : nat) (persistent : bool), command) := none)
/- Optional handler that will be called before the attribute is removed from a declaration. -/
(before_unset : option (Π (decl : _root_.name) (persistent : bool), command) := none)
/- Registers a new user-defined attribute. The argument must be the name of a definition of type
`user_attribute` or a sub-structure. -/
meta def attribute.register (decl : name) : command :=
tactic.set_basic_attribute ``user_attribute decl tt
meta structure caching_user_attribute (α : Type) extends user_attribute :=
(mk_cache : list _root_.name → tactic α)
(dependencies : list _root_.name)
meta constant caching_user_attribute.get_cache : Π {α : Type}, caching_user_attribute α → tactic α
open tactic
meta def register_attribute := attribute.register
meta def mk_name_set_attr (attr_name : name) : command :=
do let t := `(caching_user_attribute name_set),
let v := `({name := attr_name,
descr := "name_set attribute",
mk_cache := λ ns, return (name_set.of_list ns),
dependencies := [] } : caching_user_attribute name_set),
add_meta_definition attr_name [] t v,
register_attribute attr_name
meta def get_name_set_for_attr (attr_name : name) : tactic name_set :=
do
cnst ← return (expr.const attr_name []),
attr ← eval_expr (caching_user_attribute name_set) cnst,
caching_user_attribute.get_cache attr
|
7057131bccc4d2b450d00197cd7405cbfbafd036 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/algebraic_topology/cech_nerve.lean | 9c21341cfe6cb8f09f6f5a5a3804b367e00bb27c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,911 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz
-/
import algebraic_topology.simplicial_object
import category_theory.limits.shapes.wide_pullbacks
import category_theory.arrow
/-!
# The Čech Nerve
This file provides a definition of the Čech nerve associated to an arrow, provided
the base category has the correct wide pullbacks.
Several variants are provided, given `f : arrow C`:
1. `f.cech_nerve` is the Čech nerve, considered as a simplicial object in `C`.
2. `f.augmented_cech_nerve` is the augmented Čech nerve, considered as an
augmented simplicial object in `C`.
3. `simplicial_object.cech_nerve` and `simplicial_object.augmented_cech_nerve` are
functorial versions of 1 resp. 2.
-/
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
noncomputable theory
universes v u
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
namespace category_theory.arrow
variables (f : arrow C)
variables [∀ n : ℕ, has_wide_pullback f.right (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), f.left) (λ i, f.hom)]
/-- The Čech nerve associated to an arrow. -/
@[simps]
def cech_nerve : simplicial_object C :=
{ obj := λ n, wide_pullback f.right
(λ i : ulift (fin (n.unop.len + 1)), f.left) (λ i, f.hom),
map := λ m n g, wide_pullback.lift (wide_pullback.base _)
(λ i, wide_pullback.π (λ i, f.hom) $ ulift.up $ g.unop.to_order_hom i.down) $ λ j, by simp,
map_id' := λ x, by { ext ⟨⟩, { simpa }, { simp } },
map_comp' := λ x y z f g, by { ext ⟨⟩, { simpa }, { simp } } }
/-- The morphism between Čech nerves associated to a morphism of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def map_cech_nerve {f g : arrow C}
[∀ n : ℕ, has_wide_pullback f.right (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), f.left) (λ i, f.hom)]
[∀ n : ℕ, has_wide_pullback g.right (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), g.left) (λ i, g.hom)]
(F : f ⟶ g) : f.cech_nerve ⟶ g.cech_nerve :=
{ app := λ n, wide_pullback.lift (wide_pullback.base _ ≫ F.right)
(λ i, wide_pullback.π _ i ≫ F.left) $ λ j, by simp,
naturality' := λ x y f, by { ext ⟨⟩, { simp }, { simp } } }
/-- The augmented Čech nerve associated to an arrow. -/
@[simps]
def augmented_cech_nerve : simplicial_object.augmented C :=
{ left := f.cech_nerve,
right := f.right,
hom :=
{ app := λ i, wide_pullback.base _,
naturality' := λ x y f, by { dsimp, simp } } }
/-- The morphism between augmented Čech nerve associated to a morphism of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def map_augmented_cech_nerve {f g : arrow C}
[∀ n : ℕ, has_wide_pullback f.right (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), f.left) (λ i, f.hom)]
[∀ n : ℕ, has_wide_pullback g.right (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), g.left) (λ i, g.hom)]
(F : f ⟶ g) : f.augmented_cech_nerve ⟶ g.augmented_cech_nerve :=
{ left := map_cech_nerve F,
right := F.right,
w' := by { ext, simp } }
end category_theory.arrow
namespace category_theory
namespace simplicial_object
variables [∀ (n : ℕ) (f : arrow C),
has_wide_pullback f.right (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), f.left) (λ i, f.hom)]
/-- The Čech nerve construction, as a functor from `arrow C`. -/
@[simps]
def cech_nerve : arrow C ⥤ simplicial_object C :=
{ obj := λ f, f.cech_nerve,
map := λ f g F, arrow.map_cech_nerve F,
map_id' := λ i, by { ext, { simp }, { simp } },
map_comp' := λ x y z f g, by { ext, { simp }, { simp } } }
/-- The augmented Čech nerve construction, as a functor from `arrow C`. -/
@[simps]
def augmented_cech_nerve : arrow C ⥤ simplicial_object.augmented C :=
{ obj := λ f, f.augmented_cech_nerve,
map := λ f g F, arrow.map_augmented_cech_nerve F,
map_id' := λ x, by { ext, { simp }, { simp }, { refl } },
map_comp' := λ x y z f g, by { ext, { simp }, { simp }, { refl } } }
/-- A helper function used in defining the Čech adjunction. -/
@[simps]
def equivalence_right_to_left (X : simplicial_object.augmented C) (F : arrow C)
(G : X ⟶ F.augmented_cech_nerve) : augmented.to_arrow.obj X ⟶ F :=
{ left := G.left.app _ ≫ wide_pullback.π (λ i, F.hom) ⟨0⟩,
right := G.right,
w' := begin
have := G.w,
apply_fun (λ e, e.app (opposite.op $ simplex_category.mk 0)) at this,
simpa using this,
end }
/-- A helper function used in defining the Čech adjunction. -/
@[simps]
def equivalence_left_to_right (X : simplicial_object.augmented C) (F : arrow C)
(G : augmented.to_arrow.obj X ⟶ F) : X ⟶ F.augmented_cech_nerve :=
{ left :=
{ app := λ x, limits.wide_pullback.lift (X.hom.app _ ≫ G.right)
(λ i, X.left.map (simplex_category.const x.unop i.down).op ≫ G.left)
(λ i, by { dsimp, erw [category.assoc, arrow.w,
augmented.to_arrow_obj_hom, nat_trans.naturality_assoc,
functor.const.obj_map, category.id_comp] } ),
naturality' := begin
intros x y f,
ext,
{ dsimp,
simp only [wide_pullback.lift_π, category.assoc],
rw [← category.assoc, ← X.left.map_comp],
refl },
{ dsimp,
simp only [functor.const.obj_map, nat_trans.naturality_assoc,
wide_pullback.lift_base, category.assoc],
erw category.id_comp }
end },
right := G.right,
w' := by { ext, dsimp, simp } }
/-- A helper function used in defining the Čech adjunction. -/
@[simps]
def cech_nerve_equiv (X : simplicial_object.augmented C) (F : arrow C) :
(augmented.to_arrow.obj X ⟶ F) ≃ (X ⟶ F.augmented_cech_nerve) :=
{ to_fun := equivalence_left_to_right _ _,
inv_fun := equivalence_right_to_left _ _,
left_inv := begin
intro A,
dsimp,
ext,
{ dsimp,
erw wide_pullback.lift_π,
nth_rewrite 1 ← category.id_comp A.left,
congr' 1,
convert X.left.map_id _,
rw ← op_id,
congr' 1,
ext ⟨a,ha⟩,
change a < 1 at ha,
change 0 = a,
linarith },
{ refl, }
end,
right_inv := begin
intro A,
ext _ ⟨j⟩,
{ dsimp,
simp only [arrow.cech_nerve_map, wide_pullback.lift_π, nat_trans.naturality_assoc],
erw wide_pullback.lift_π,
refl },
{ erw wide_pullback.lift_base,
have := A.w,
apply_fun (λ e, e.app x) at this,
rw nat_trans.comp_app at this,
erw this,
refl },
{ refl }
end }
/-- The augmented Čech nerve construction is right adjoint to the `to_arrow` functor. -/
abbreviation cech_nerve_adjunction :
(augmented.to_arrow : _ ⥤ arrow C) ⊣ augmented_cech_nerve :=
adjunction.mk_of_hom_equiv
{ hom_equiv := cech_nerve_equiv,
hom_equiv_naturality_left_symm' := λ x y f g h, by { ext, { simp }, { simp } },
hom_equiv_naturality_right' := λ x y f g h, by { ext, { simp }, { simp }, { refl } } }
end simplicial_object
end category_theory
namespace category_theory.arrow
variables (f : arrow C)
variables [∀ n : ℕ, has_wide_pushout f.left (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), f.right) (λ i, f.hom)]
/-- The Čech conerve associated to an arrow. -/
@[simps]
def cech_conerve : cosimplicial_object C :=
{ obj := λ n, wide_pushout f.left
(λ i : ulift (fin (n.len + 1)), f.right) (λ i, f.hom),
map := λ m n g, wide_pushout.desc (wide_pushout.head _)
(λ i, wide_pushout.ι (λ i, f.hom) $ ulift.up $ g.to_order_hom i.down) $
λ i, by { rw [wide_pushout.arrow_ι (λ i, f.hom)] },
map_id' := λ x, by { ext ⟨⟩, { simpa }, { simp } },
map_comp' := λ x y z f g, by { ext ⟨⟩, { simpa }, { simp } } }
/-- The morphism between Čech conerves associated to a morphism of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def map_cech_conerve {f g : arrow C}
[∀ n : ℕ, has_wide_pushout f.left (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), f.right) (λ i, f.hom)]
[∀ n : ℕ, has_wide_pushout g.left (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), g.right) (λ i, g.hom)]
(F : f ⟶ g) : f.cech_conerve ⟶ g.cech_conerve :=
{ app := λ n, wide_pushout.desc (F.left ≫ wide_pushout.head _)
(λ i, F.right ≫ wide_pushout.ι _ i) $
λ i, by { rw [← arrow.w_assoc F, wide_pushout.arrow_ι (λ i, g.hom)] },
naturality' := λ x y f, by { ext, { simp }, { simp } } }
/-- The augmented Čech conerve associated to an arrow. -/
@[simps]
def augmented_cech_conerve : cosimplicial_object.augmented C :=
{ left := f.left,
right := f.cech_conerve,
hom :=
{ app := λ i, wide_pushout.head _,
naturality' := λ x y f, by { dsimp, simp } } }
/-- The morphism between augmented Čech conerves associated to a morphism of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def map_augmented_cech_conerve {f g : arrow C}
[∀ n : ℕ, has_wide_pushout f.left (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), f.right) (λ i, f.hom)]
[∀ n : ℕ, has_wide_pushout g.left (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), g.right) (λ i, g.hom)]
(F : f ⟶ g) : f.augmented_cech_conerve ⟶ g.augmented_cech_conerve :=
{ left := F.left,
right := map_cech_conerve F,
w' := by { ext, simp } }
end category_theory.arrow
namespace category_theory
namespace cosimplicial_object
variables [∀ (n : ℕ) (f : arrow C),
has_wide_pushout f.left (λ i : ulift (fin (n+1)), f.right) (λ i, f.hom)]
/-- The Čech conerve construction, as a functor from `arrow C`. -/
@[simps]
def cech_conerve : arrow C ⥤ cosimplicial_object C :=
{ obj := λ f, f.cech_conerve,
map := λ f g F, arrow.map_cech_conerve F,
map_id' := λ i, by { ext, { dsimp, simp }, { dsimp, simp } },
map_comp' := λ f g h F G, by { ext, { simp }, { simp } } }
/-- The augmented Čech conerve construction, as a functor from `arrow C`. -/
@[simps]
def augmented_cech_conerve : arrow C ⥤ cosimplicial_object.augmented C :=
{ obj := λ f, f.augmented_cech_conerve,
map := λ f g F, arrow.map_augmented_cech_conerve F,
map_id' := λ f, by { ext, { refl }, { dsimp, simp }, { dsimp, simp } },
map_comp' := λ f g h F G, by { ext, { refl }, { simp }, { simp } } }
/-- A helper function used in defining the Čech conerve adjunction. -/
@[simps]
def equivalence_left_to_right (F : arrow C) (X : cosimplicial_object.augmented C)
(G : F.augmented_cech_conerve ⟶ X) : F ⟶ augmented.to_arrow.obj X :=
{ left := G.left,
right :=
(wide_pushout.ι (λ i, F.hom) (_root_.ulift.up 0) ≫ G.right.app (simplex_category.mk 0) : _),
w' := begin
have := G.w,
apply_fun (λ e, e.app (simplex_category.mk 0)) at this,
simpa only [category_theory.functor.id_map, augmented.to_arrow_obj_hom,
wide_pushout.arrow_ι_assoc (λ i, F.hom)],
end }
/-- A helper function used in defining the Čech conerve adjunction. -/
@[simps]
def equivalence_right_to_left (F : arrow C) (X : cosimplicial_object.augmented C)
(G : F ⟶ augmented.to_arrow.obj X) : F.augmented_cech_conerve ⟶ X :=
{ left := G.left,
right := { app := λ x, limits.wide_pushout.desc (G.left ≫ X.hom.app _)
(λ i, G.right ≫ X.right.map (simplex_category.const x i.down))
begin
rintros ⟨j⟩,
rw ← arrow.w_assoc G,
have t := X.hom.naturality (x.const j),
dsimp at t ⊢,
simp only [category.id_comp] at t,
rw ← t,
end,
naturality' := begin
intros x y f,
ext,
{ dsimp,
simp only [wide_pushout.ι_desc_assoc, wide_pushout.ι_desc],
rw [category.assoc, ←X.right.map_comp],
refl },
{ dsimp,
simp only [functor.const.obj_map, ←nat_trans.naturality,
wide_pushout.head_desc_assoc, wide_pushout.head_desc, category.assoc],
erw category.id_comp }
end },
w' := by { ext, simp } }
/-- A helper function used in defining the Čech conerve adjunction. -/
@[simps]
def cech_conerve_equiv (F : arrow C) (X : cosimplicial_object.augmented C) :
(F.augmented_cech_conerve ⟶ X) ≃ (F ⟶ augmented.to_arrow.obj X) :=
{ to_fun := equivalence_left_to_right _ _,
inv_fun := equivalence_right_to_left _ _,
left_inv := begin
intro A,
dsimp,
ext _, { refl }, ext _ ⟨⟩, -- A bug in the `ext` tactic?
{ dsimp,
simp only [arrow.cech_conerve_map, wide_pushout.ι_desc, category.assoc,
← nat_trans.naturality, wide_pushout.ι_desc_assoc],
refl },
{ erw wide_pushout.head_desc,
have := A.w,
apply_fun (λ e, e.app x) at this,
rw nat_trans.comp_app at this,
erw this,
refl },
end,
right_inv := begin
intro A,
ext,
{ refl, },
{ dsimp,
erw wide_pushout.ι_desc,
nth_rewrite 1 ← category.comp_id A.right,
congr' 1,
convert X.right.map_id _,
ext ⟨a,ha⟩,
change a < 1 at ha,
change 0 = a,
linarith },
end }
/-- The augmented Čech conerve construction is left adjoint to the `to_arrow` functor. -/
abbreviation cech_conerve_adjunction :
augmented_cech_conerve ⊣ (augmented.to_arrow : _ ⥤ arrow C) :=
adjunction.mk_of_hom_equiv
{ hom_equiv := cech_conerve_equiv,
hom_equiv_naturality_left_symm' := λ x y f g h, by { ext, { refl }, { simp }, { simp } },
hom_equiv_naturality_right' := λ x y f g h, by { ext, { simp }, { simp } } }
end cosimplicial_object
end category_theory
|
97122f053a0937d7275cd9a6d4f3ec853ab9f296 | 8d65764a9e5f0923a67fc435eb1a5a1d02fd80e3 | /src/category_theory/is_connected.lean | dbd3cee42c779ade098d6c19ce8f680cbdb51c17 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | troyjlee/mathlib | e18d4b8026e32062ab9e89bc3b003a5d1cfec3f5 | 45e7eb8447555247246e3fe91c87066506c14875 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,248,035,046 | 1,629,470,528,000 | 1,629,470,528,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,447 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import data.list.chain
import category_theory.punit
import category_theory.groupoid
/-!
# Connected category
Define a connected category as a _nonempty_ category for which every functor
to a discrete category is isomorphic to the constant functor.
NB. Some authors include the empty category as connected, we do not.
We instead are interested in categories with exactly one 'connected
component'.
We give some equivalent definitions:
- A nonempty category for which every functor to a discrete category is
constant on objects.
See `any_functor_const_on_obj` and `connected.of_any_functor_const_on_obj`.
- A nonempty category for which every function `F` for which the presence of a
morphism `f : j₁ ⟶ j₂` implies `F j₁ = F j₂` must be constant everywhere.
See `constant_of_preserves_morphisms` and `connected.of_constant_of_preserves_morphisms`.
- A nonempty category for which any subset of its elements containing the
default and closed under morphisms is everything.
See `induct_on_objects` and `connected.of_induct`.
- A nonempty category for which every object is related under the reflexive
transitive closure of the relation "there is a morphism in some direction
from `j₁` to `j₂`".
See `connected_zigzag` and `zigzag_connected`.
- A nonempty category for which for any two objects there is a sequence of
morphisms (some reversed) from one to the other.
See `exists_zigzag'` and `connected_of_zigzag`.
We also prove the result that the functor given by `(X × -)` preserves any
connected limit. That is, any limit of shape `J` where `J` is a connected
category is preserved by the functor `(X × -)`. This appears in `category_theory.limits.connected`.
-/
universes v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable theory
open category_theory.category
namespace category_theory
/--
A possibly empty category for which every functor to a discrete category is constant.
-/
class is_preconnected (J : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} J] : Prop :=
(iso_constant : Π {α : Type u₁} (F : J ⥤ discrete α) (j : J),
nonempty (F ≅ (functor.const J).obj (F.obj j)))
/--
We define a connected category as a _nonempty_ category for which every
functor to a discrete category is constant.
NB. Some authors include the empty category as connected, we do not.
We instead are interested in categories with exactly one 'connected
component'.
This allows us to show that the functor X ⨯ - preserves connected limits.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002S
-/
class is_connected (J : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} J] extends is_preconnected J : Prop :=
[is_nonempty : nonempty J]
attribute [instance, priority 100] is_connected.is_nonempty
variables {J : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} J]
variables {K : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} K]
/--
If `J` is connected, any functor `F : J ⥤ discrete α` is isomorphic to
the constant functor with value `F.obj j` (for any choice of `j`).
-/
def iso_constant [is_preconnected J] {α : Type u₁} (F : J ⥤ discrete α) (j : J) :
F ≅ (functor.const J).obj (F.obj j) :=
(is_preconnected.iso_constant F j).some
/--
If J is connected, any functor to a discrete category is constant on objects.
The converse is given in `is_connected.of_any_functor_const_on_obj`.
-/
lemma any_functor_const_on_obj [is_preconnected J]
{α : Type u₁} (F : J ⥤ discrete α) (j j' : J) :
F.obj j = F.obj j' :=
((iso_constant F j').hom.app j).down.1
/--
If any functor to a discrete category is constant on objects, J is connected.
The converse of `any_functor_const_on_obj`.
-/
lemma is_connected.of_any_functor_const_on_obj [nonempty J]
(h : ∀ {α : Type u₁} (F : J ⥤ discrete α), ∀ (j j' : J), F.obj j = F.obj j') :
is_connected J :=
{ iso_constant := λ α F j',
⟨nat_iso.of_components (λ j, eq_to_iso (h F j j')) (λ _ _ _, subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩ }
/--
If `J` is connected, then given any function `F` such that the presence of a
morphism `j₁ ⟶ j₂` implies `F j₁ = F j₂`, we have that `F` is constant.
This can be thought of as a local-to-global property.
The converse is shown in `is_connected.of_constant_of_preserves_morphisms`
-/
lemma constant_of_preserves_morphisms [is_preconnected J] {α : Type u₁} (F : J → α)
(h : ∀ (j₁ j₂ : J) (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂), F j₁ = F j₂) (j j' : J) :
F j = F j' :=
any_functor_const_on_obj { obj := F, map := λ _ _ f, eq_to_hom (h _ _ f) } j j'
/--
`J` is connected if: given any function `F : J → α` which is constant for any
`j₁, j₂` for which there is a morphism `j₁ ⟶ j₂`, then `F` is constant.
This can be thought of as a local-to-global property.
The converse of `constant_of_preserves_morphisms`.
-/
lemma is_connected.of_constant_of_preserves_morphisms [nonempty J]
(h : ∀ {α : Type u₁} (F : J → α), (∀ {j₁ j₂ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂), F j₁ = F j₂) →
(∀ j j' : J, F j = F j')) :
is_connected J :=
is_connected.of_any_functor_const_on_obj (λ _ F, h F.obj (λ _ _ f, (F.map f).down.1))
/--
An inductive-like property for the objects of a connected category.
If the set `p` is nonempty, and `p` is closed under morphisms of `J`,
then `p` contains all of `J`.
The converse is given in `is_connected.of_induct`.
-/
lemma induct_on_objects [is_preconnected J] (p : set J) {j₀ : J} (h0 : j₀ ∈ p)
(h1 : ∀ {j₁ j₂ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂), j₁ ∈ p ↔ j₂ ∈ p) (j : J) :
j ∈ p :=
begin
injection (constant_of_preserves_morphisms (λ k, ulift.up (k ∈ p)) (λ j₁ j₂ f, _) j j₀) with i,
rwa i,
dsimp,
exact congr_arg ulift.up (propext (h1 f)),
end
/--
If any maximal connected component containing some element j₀ of J is all of J, then J is connected.
The converse of `induct_on_objects`.
-/
lemma is_connected.of_induct [nonempty J] {j₀ : J}
(h : ∀ (p : set J), j₀ ∈ p → (∀ {j₁ j₂ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂), j₁ ∈ p ↔ j₂ ∈ p) → ∀ (j : J), j ∈ p) :
is_connected J :=
is_connected.of_constant_of_preserves_morphisms (λ α F a,
begin
have w := h {j | F j = F j₀} rfl (λ _ _ f, by simp [a f]),
dsimp at w,
intros j j',
rw [w j, w j'],
end)
/--
Another induction principle for `is_preconnected J`:
given a type family `Z : J → Sort*` and
a rule for transporting in *both* directions along a morphism in `J`,
we can transport an `x : Z j₀` to a point in `Z j` for any `j`.
-/
lemma is_preconnected_induction [is_preconnected J] (Z : J → Sort*)
(h₁ : Π {j₁ j₂ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂), Z j₁ → Z j₂)
(h₂ : Π {j₁ j₂ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂), Z j₂ → Z j₁)
{j₀ : J} (x : Z j₀) (j : J) : nonempty (Z j) :=
(induct_on_objects {j | nonempty (Z j)} ⟨x⟩
(λ j₁ j₂ f, ⟨by { rintro ⟨y⟩, exact ⟨h₁ f y⟩, }, by { rintro ⟨y⟩, exact ⟨h₂ f y⟩, }⟩) j : _)
/-- If `J` and `K` are equivalent, then if `J` is preconnected then `K` is as well. -/
lemma is_preconnected_of_equivalent {K : Type u₁} [category.{v₂} K] [is_preconnected J]
(e : J ≌ K) :
is_preconnected K :=
{ iso_constant := λ α F k, ⟨
calc F ≅ e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⋙ F : (e.inv_fun_id_assoc F).symm
... ≅ e.inverse ⋙ (functor.const J).obj ((e.functor ⋙ F).obj (e.inverse.obj k)) :
iso_whisker_left e.inverse (iso_constant (e.functor ⋙ F) (e.inverse.obj k))
... ≅ e.inverse ⋙ (functor.const J).obj (F.obj k) :
iso_whisker_left _ ((F ⋙ functor.const J).map_iso (e.counit_iso.app k))
... ≅ (functor.const K).obj (F.obj k) : nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso.refl _) (by simp),
⟩ }
/-- If `J` and `K` are equivalent, then if `J` is connected then `K` is as well. -/
lemma is_connected_of_equivalent {K : Type u₁} [category.{v₂} K]
(e : J ≌ K) [is_connected J] :
is_connected K :=
{ is_nonempty := nonempty.map e.functor.obj (by apply_instance),
to_is_preconnected := is_preconnected_of_equivalent e }
/-- j₁ and j₂ are related by `zag` if there is a morphism between them. -/
@[reducible]
def zag (j₁ j₂ : J) : Prop := nonempty (j₁ ⟶ j₂) ∨ nonempty (j₂ ⟶ j₁)
lemma zag_symmetric : symmetric (@zag J _) :=
λ j₂ j₁ h, h.swap
/--
`j₁` and `j₂` are related by `zigzag` if there is a chain of
morphisms from `j₁` to `j₂`, with backward morphisms allowed.
-/
@[reducible]
def zigzag : J → J → Prop := relation.refl_trans_gen zag
lemma zigzag_symmetric : symmetric (@zigzag J _) :=
relation.refl_trans_gen.symmetric zag_symmetric
lemma zigzag_equivalence : _root_.equivalence (@zigzag J _) :=
mk_equivalence _
relation.reflexive_refl_trans_gen
zigzag_symmetric
relation.transitive_refl_trans_gen
/--
The setoid given by the equivalence relation `zigzag`. A quotient for this
setoid is a connected component of the category.
-/
def zigzag.setoid (J : Type u₂) [category.{v₁} J] : setoid J :=
{ r := zigzag,
iseqv := zigzag_equivalence }
/--
If there is a zigzag from `j₁` to `j₂`, then there is a zigzag from `F j₁` to
`F j₂` as long as `F` is a functor.
-/
lemma zigzag_obj_of_zigzag (F : J ⥤ K) {j₁ j₂ : J} (h : zigzag j₁ j₂) :
zigzag (F.obj j₁) (F.obj j₂) :=
begin
refine relation.refl_trans_gen_lift _ _ h,
intros j k,
exact or.imp (nonempty.map (λ f, F.map f)) (nonempty.map (λ f, F.map f))
end
-- TODO: figure out the right way to generalise this to `zigzag`.
lemma zag_of_zag_obj (F : J ⥤ K) [full F] {j₁ j₂ : J} (h : zag (F.obj j₁) (F.obj j₂)) :
zag j₁ j₂ :=
or.imp (nonempty.map F.preimage) (nonempty.map F.preimage) h
/-- Any equivalence relation containing (⟶) holds for all pairs of a connected category. -/
lemma equiv_relation [is_connected J] (r : J → J → Prop) (hr : _root_.equivalence r)
(h : ∀ {j₁ j₂ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂), r j₁ j₂) :
∀ (j₁ j₂ : J), r j₁ j₂ :=
begin
have z : ∀ (j : J), r (classical.arbitrary J) j :=
induct_on_objects (λ k, r (classical.arbitrary J) k)
(hr.1 (classical.arbitrary J)) (λ _ _ f, ⟨λ t, hr.2.2 t (h f), λ t, hr.2.2 t (hr.2.1 (h f))⟩),
intros, apply hr.2.2 (hr.2.1 (z _)) (z _)
end
/-- In a connected category, any two objects are related by `zigzag`. -/
lemma is_connected_zigzag [is_connected J] (j₁ j₂ : J) : zigzag j₁ j₂ :=
equiv_relation _ zigzag_equivalence
(λ _ _ f, relation.refl_trans_gen.single (or.inl (nonempty.intro f))) _ _
/--
If any two objects in an nonempty category are related by `zigzag`, the category is connected.
-/
lemma zigzag_is_connected [nonempty J] (h : ∀ (j₁ j₂ : J), zigzag j₁ j₂) : is_connected J :=
begin
apply is_connected.of_induct,
intros p hp hjp j,
have: ∀ (j₁ j₂ : J), zigzag j₁ j₂ → (j₁ ∈ p ↔ j₂ ∈ p),
{ introv k,
induction k with _ _ rt_zag zag,
{ refl },
{ rw k_ih,
rcases zag with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_⟩⟩,
apply hjp zag,
apply (hjp zag).symm } },
rwa this j (classical.arbitrary J) (h _ _)
end
lemma exists_zigzag' [is_connected J] (j₁ j₂ : J) :
∃ l, list.chain zag j₁ l ∧ list.last (j₁ :: l) (list.cons_ne_nil _ _) = j₂ :=
list.exists_chain_of_relation_refl_trans_gen (is_connected_zigzag _ _)
/--
If any two objects in an nonempty category are linked by a sequence of (potentially reversed)
morphisms, then J is connected.
The converse of `exists_zigzag'`.
-/
lemma is_connected_of_zigzag [nonempty J]
(h : ∀ (j₁ j₂ : J), ∃ l, list.chain zag j₁ l ∧ list.last (j₁ :: l) (list.cons_ne_nil _ _) = j₂) :
is_connected J :=
begin
apply zigzag_is_connected,
intros j₁ j₂,
rcases h j₁ j₂ with ⟨l, hl₁, hl₂⟩,
apply list.relation_refl_trans_gen_of_exists_chain l hl₁ hl₂,
end
/-- If `discrete α` is connected, then `α` is (type-)equivalent to `punit`. -/
def discrete_is_connected_equiv_punit {α : Type u₁} [is_connected (discrete α)] : α ≃ punit :=
discrete.equiv_of_equivalence
{ functor := functor.star α,
inverse := discrete.functor (λ _, classical.arbitrary _),
unit_iso := by { exact (iso_constant _ (classical.arbitrary _)), },
counit_iso := functor.punit_ext _ _ }
variables {C : Type u₂} [category.{u₁} C]
/--
For objects `X Y : C`, any natural transformation `α : const X ⟶ const Y` from a connected
category must be constant.
This is the key property of connected categories which we use to establish properties about limits.
-/
lemma nat_trans_from_is_connected [is_preconnected J] {X Y : C}
(α : (functor.const J).obj X ⟶ (functor.const J).obj Y) :
∀ (j j' : J), α.app j = (α.app j' : X ⟶ Y) :=
@constant_of_preserves_morphisms _ _ _
(X ⟶ Y)
(λ j, α.app j)
(λ _ _ f, (by { have := α.naturality f, erw [id_comp, comp_id] at this, exact this.symm }))
instance [is_connected J] : full (functor.const J : C ⥤ J ⥤ C) :=
{ preimage := λ X Y f, f.app (classical.arbitrary J),
witness' := λ X Y f,
begin
ext j,
apply nat_trans_from_is_connected f (classical.arbitrary J) j,
end }
instance nonempty_hom_of_connected_groupoid {G} [groupoid G] [is_connected G] :
∀ (x y : G), nonempty (x ⟶ y) :=
begin
refine equiv_relation _ _ (λ j₁ j₂, nonempty.intro),
exact ⟨λ j, ⟨𝟙 _⟩, λ j₁ j₂, nonempty.map (λ f, inv f), λ _ _ _, nonempty.map2 (≫)⟩,
end
end category_theory
|
f194954daef9b58050ba0cfa5c9b75c9bea000fb | 48eee836fdb5c613d9a20741c17db44c8e12e61c | /src/algebra/theories/category.lean | 3e21b5b03998df205b86ac5f78deffe56f3e5050 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fgdorais/lean-universal | 06430443a4abe51e303e602684c2977d1f5c0834 | 9259b0f7fb3aa83a9e0a7a3eaa44c262e42cc9b1 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,479,744,136 | 1,589,473,399,000 | 1,589,473,399,000 | 196,287,552 | 1 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,505 | lean | -- Copyright © 2019 François G. Dorais. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
import .basic
import .monoid
import .group
import .action
namespace algebra
/-
signature command cannot handle operation parameters,
so we define category_sig manually; category_hom is missing.
-/
structure category_sig {α : Type*} (β : α → α → Type*) :=
(op (a b c : α) : β a b → β b c → β a c)
(id (a : α) : β a a)
namespace category_sig
variables {α : Type*} {β : α → α → Type*} (s : category_sig β)
@[signature_instance]
definition to_monoid (a : α) : monoid_sig (β a a) :=
{ op := s.op a a a
, id := s.id a
}
@[signature_instance]
definition to_left_action (a b : α) : left_action_sig (β a a) (β a b) :=
{ act := s.op a a b
}
@[signature_instance]
definition to_right_action (a b : α) : right_action_sig (β a a) (β b a) :=
{ act := s.op b a a
}
end category_sig
/- TODO: fix theory attribute to handle parameters correctly -/
class category {α : Type*} {β : α → α → Type*} (s : category_sig β) : Prop := intro ::
(assoc (a b c d) : identity.op_compatibility (s.op a c d) (s.op a b c) (s.op a b d) (s.op b c d))
(left_identity (a b) : identity.op_left_identity (s.op a a b) (s.id a))
(right_identity (a b) : identity.op_right_identity (s.op a b b) (s.id b))
attribute [identity_instance] category.assoc
attribute [identity_instance] category.left_identity
attribute [identity_instance] category.right_identity
namespace category
variables {α : Type*} {β : α → α → Type*} (s : category_sig β) [i : category s]
definition infer
[Π (a b c d), class.op_compatibility (s.op a c d) (s.op a b c) (s.op a b d) (s.op b c d)]
[Π (a b), class.op_left_identity (s.op a a b) (s.id a)]
[Π (a b), class.op_right_identity (s.op a b b) (s.id b)] : category s :=
category.intro
(λ _ _ _ _, op_compatibility _ _ _ _)
(λ _ _, op_left_identity _ _)
(λ _ _, op_right_identity _ _)
include i
instance to_monoid (a : α) : monoid (s.to_monoid a) := monoid.infer _
instance to_left_monoid_action (a b : α) : left_monoid_action (s.to_monoid a) (s.to_left_action a b) := left_monoid_action.infer _ _
instance to_right_monoid_action (a b : α) : right_monoid_action (s.to_monoid a) (s.to_right_action a b) := right_monoid_action.infer _ _
end category
end algebra
/- move to monoid when ready -/
namespace algebra
namespace monoid_sig
variables {α : Type*} (s : monoid_sig α)
@[signature_instance]
definition to_category : category_sig (λ (_ _ : unit), α) :=
{ op := λ _ _ _, s.op
, id := λ _, s.id
}
end monoid_sig
namespace monoid
variables {α : Type*} (s : monoid_sig α) [monoid s]
@[identity_instance]
theorem to_category_compatibility (a b c d : unit) : identity.op_compatibility (s.to_category.op a c d) (s.to_category.op a b c) (s.to_category.op a b d) (s.to_category.op b c d) :=
show identity.op_compatibility s.op s.op s.op s.op, from op_associative s.op
@[identity_instance]
theorem to_category_left_identity (a b : unit) : identity.op_left_identity (s.to_category.op a a b) (s.to_category.id a) :=
show identity.op_left_identity s.op s.id, from op_left_identity s.op s.id
@[identity_instance]
theorem to_category_right_identity (a b : unit) : identity.op_right_identity (s.to_category.op a b b) (s.to_category.id b) :=
show identity.op_right_identity s.op s.id, from op_right_identity s.op s.id
instance to_category : category s.to_category := category.infer _
end monoid
end algebra |
6ecc4e544eeef5a72f0a3e0d5ff892054ddbc700 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/data/setoid/partition.lean | 665d242399391e9b1266e801a10761ea62ada402 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,910 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Patrick Massot
-/
import data.setoid.basic
import data.set.pairwise
/-!
# Equivalence relations: partitions
This file comprises properties of equivalence relations viewed as partitions.
There are two implementations of partitions here:
* A collection `c : set (set α)` of sets is a partition of `α` if `∅ ∉ c` and each element `a : α`
belongs to a unique set `b ∈ c`. This is expressed as `is_partition c`
* An indexed partition is a map `s : ι → α` whose image is a partition. This is
expressed as `indexed_partition s`.
Of course both implementations are related to `quotient` and `setoid`.
## Tags
setoid, equivalence, iseqv, relation, equivalence relation, partition, equivalence class
-/
namespace setoid
variables {α : Type*}
/-- If x ∈ α is in 2 elements of a set of sets partitioning α, those 2 sets are equal. -/
lemma eq_of_mem_eqv_class {c : set (set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b)
{x b b'} (hc : b ∈ c) (hb : x ∈ b) (hc' : b' ∈ c) (hb' : x ∈ b') :
b = b' :=
(H x).unique2 hc hb hc' hb'
/-- Makes an equivalence relation from a set of sets partitioning α. -/
def mk_classes (c : set (set α)) (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) :
setoid α :=
⟨λ x y, ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s → y ∈ s, ⟨λ _ _ _ hx, hx,
λ x y h s hs hy, (H x).elim2 $ λ t ht hx _,
have s = t, from eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs hy ht (h t ht hx),
this.symm ▸ hx,
λ x y z h1 h2 s hs hx, (H y).elim2 $ λ t ht hy _, (H z).elim2 $ λ t' ht' hz _,
have hst : s = t, from eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs (h1 _ hs hx) ht hy,
have htt' : t = t', from eq_of_mem_eqv_class H ht (h2 _ ht hy) ht' hz,
(hst.trans htt').symm ▸ hz⟩⟩
/-- Makes the equivalence classes of an equivalence relation. -/
def classes (r : setoid α) : set (set α) :=
{s | ∃ y, s = {x | r.rel x y}}
lemma mem_classes (r : setoid α) (y) : {x | r.rel x y} ∈ r.classes := ⟨y, rfl⟩
/-- Two equivalence relations are equal iff all their equivalence classes are equal. -/
lemma eq_iff_classes_eq {r₁ r₂ : setoid α} :
r₁ = r₂ ↔ ∀ x, {y | r₁.rel x y} = {y | r₂.rel x y} :=
⟨λ h x, h ▸ rfl, λ h, ext' $ λ x, set.ext_iff.1 $ h x⟩
lemma rel_iff_exists_classes (r : setoid α) {x y} :
r.rel x y ↔ ∃ c ∈ r.classes, x ∈ c ∧ y ∈ c :=
⟨λ h, ⟨_, r.mem_classes y, h, r.refl' y⟩,
λ ⟨c, ⟨z, hz⟩, hx, hy⟩, by { subst c, exact r.trans' hx (r.symm' hy) }⟩
/-- Two equivalence relations are equal iff their equivalence classes are equal. -/
lemma classes_inj {r₁ r₂ : setoid α} :
r₁ = r₂ ↔ r₁.classes = r₂.classes :=
⟨λ h, h ▸ rfl, λ h, ext' $ λ a b, by simp only [rel_iff_exists_classes, exists_prop, h] ⟩
/-- The empty set is not an equivalence class. -/
lemma empty_not_mem_classes {r : setoid α} : ∅ ∉ r.classes :=
λ ⟨y, hy⟩, set.not_mem_empty y $ hy.symm ▸ r.refl' y
/-- Equivalence classes partition the type. -/
lemma classes_eqv_classes {r : setoid α} (a) : ∃! b ∈ r.classes, a ∈ b :=
exists_unique.intro2 {x | r.rel x a} (r.mem_classes a) (r.refl' _) $
begin
rintros _ ⟨y, rfl⟩ ha,
ext x,
exact ⟨λ hx, r.trans' hx (r.symm' ha), λ hx, r.trans' hx ha⟩
end
/-- If x ∈ α is in 2 equivalence classes, the equivalence classes are equal. -/
lemma eq_of_mem_classes {r : setoid α} {x b} (hc : b ∈ r.classes)
(hb : x ∈ b) {b'} (hc' : b' ∈ r.classes) (hb' : x ∈ b') : b = b' :=
eq_of_mem_eqv_class classes_eqv_classes hc hb hc' hb'
/-- The elements of a set of sets partitioning α are the equivalence classes of the
equivalence relation defined by the set of sets. -/
lemma eq_eqv_class_of_mem {c : set (set α)}
(H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {s y} (hs : s ∈ c) (hy : y ∈ s) :
s = {x | (mk_classes c H).rel x y} :=
set.ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hs', symm' (mk_classes c H) $ λ b' hb' h', eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs hy hb' h' ▸ hs',
λ hx, (H x).elim2 $ λ b' hc' hb' h',
(eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs hy hc' $ hx b' hc' hb').symm ▸ hb'⟩
/-- The equivalence classes of the equivalence relation defined by a set of sets
partitioning α are elements of the set of sets. -/
lemma eqv_class_mem {c : set (set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {y} :
{x | (mk_classes c H).rel x y} ∈ c :=
(H y).elim2 $ λ b hc hy hb, eq_eqv_class_of_mem H hc hy ▸ hc
lemma eqv_class_mem' {c : set (set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {x} :
{y : α | (mk_classes c H).rel x y} ∈ c :=
by { convert setoid.eqv_class_mem H, ext, rw setoid.comm' }
/-- Distinct elements of a set of sets partitioning α are disjoint. -/
lemma eqv_classes_disjoint {c : set (set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) :
c.pairwise_disjoint id :=
λ b₁ h₁ b₂ h₂ h, set.disjoint_left.2 $
λ x hx1 hx2, (H x).elim2 $ λ b hc hx hb, h $ eq_of_mem_eqv_class H h₁ hx1 h₂ hx2
/-- A set of disjoint sets covering α partition α (classical). -/
lemma eqv_classes_of_disjoint_union {c : set (set α)}
(hu : set.sUnion c = @set.univ α) (H : c.pairwise_disjoint id) (a) :
∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b :=
let ⟨b, hc, ha⟩ := set.mem_sUnion.1 $ show a ∈ _, by rw hu; exact set.mem_univ a in
exists_unique.intro2 b hc ha $ λ b' hc' ha', H.elim_set hc' hc a ha' ha
/-- Makes an equivalence relation from a set of disjoints sets covering α. -/
def setoid_of_disjoint_union {c : set (set α)} (hu : set.sUnion c = @set.univ α)
(H : c.pairwise_disjoint id) : setoid α :=
setoid.mk_classes c $ eqv_classes_of_disjoint_union hu H
/-- The equivalence relation made from the equivalence classes of an equivalence
relation r equals r. -/
theorem mk_classes_classes (r : setoid α) :
mk_classes r.classes classes_eqv_classes = r :=
ext' $ λ x y, ⟨λ h, r.symm' (h {z | r.rel z x} (r.mem_classes x) $ r.refl' x),
λ h b hb hx, eq_of_mem_classes (r.mem_classes x) (r.refl' x) hb hx ▸ r.symm' h⟩
@[simp] theorem sUnion_classes (r : setoid α) : ⋃₀ r.classes = set.univ :=
set.eq_univ_of_forall $ λ x, set.mem_sUnion.2 ⟨{ y | r.rel y x }, ⟨x, rfl⟩, setoid.refl _⟩
section partition
/-- A collection `c : set (set α)` of sets is a partition of `α` into pairwise
disjoint sets if `∅ ∉ c` and each element `a : α` belongs to a unique set `b ∈ c`. -/
def is_partition (c : set (set α)) :=
∅ ∉ c ∧ ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b
/-- A partition of `α` does not contain the empty set. -/
lemma nonempty_of_mem_partition {c : set (set α)} (hc : is_partition c) {s} (h : s ∈ c) :
s.nonempty :=
set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty.1 $ λ hs0, hc.1 $ hs0 ▸ h
lemma is_partition_classes (r : setoid α) : is_partition r.classes :=
⟨empty_not_mem_classes, classes_eqv_classes⟩
lemma is_partition.pairwise_disjoint {c : set (set α)} (hc : is_partition c) :
c.pairwise_disjoint id :=
eqv_classes_disjoint hc.2
lemma is_partition.sUnion_eq_univ {c : set (set α)} (hc : is_partition c) :
⋃₀ c = set.univ :=
set.eq_univ_of_forall $ λ x, set.mem_sUnion.2 $
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hc.2 x in ⟨t, by clear_aux_decl; finish⟩
/-- All elements of a partition of α are the equivalence class of some y ∈ α. -/
lemma exists_of_mem_partition {c : set (set α)} (hc : is_partition c) {s} (hs : s ∈ c) :
∃ y, s = {x | (mk_classes c hc.2).rel x y} :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_partition hc hs in
⟨y, eq_eqv_class_of_mem hc.2 hs hy⟩
/-- The equivalence classes of the equivalence relation defined by a partition of α equal
the original partition. -/
theorem classes_mk_classes (c : set (set α)) (hc : is_partition c) :
(mk_classes c hc.2).classes = c :=
set.ext $ λ s,
⟨λ ⟨y, hs⟩, (hc.2 y).elim2 $ λ b hm hb hy,
by rwa (show s = b, from hs.symm ▸ set.ext
(λ x, ⟨λ hx, symm' (mk_classes c hc.2) hx b hm hb,
λ hx b' hc' hx', eq_of_mem_eqv_class hc.2 hm hx hc' hx' ▸ hb⟩)),
exists_of_mem_partition hc⟩
/-- Defining `≤` on partitions as the `≤` defined on their induced equivalence relations. -/
instance partition.le : has_le (subtype (@is_partition α)) :=
⟨λ x y, mk_classes x.1 x.2.2 ≤ mk_classes y.1 y.2.2⟩
/-- Defining a partial order on partitions as the partial order on their induced
equivalence relations. -/
instance partition.partial_order : partial_order (subtype (@is_partition α)) :=
{ le := (≤),
lt := λ x y, x ≤ y ∧ ¬y ≤ x,
le_refl := λ _, @le_refl (setoid α) _ _,
le_trans := λ _ _ _, @le_trans (setoid α) _ _ _ _,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ _ _, iff.rfl,
le_antisymm := λ x y hx hy, let h := @le_antisymm (setoid α) _ _ _ hx hy in by
rw [subtype.ext_iff_val, ←classes_mk_classes x.1 x.2, ←classes_mk_classes y.1 y.2, h] }
variables (α)
/-- The order-preserving bijection between equivalence relations on a type `α`, and
partitions of `α` into subsets. -/
protected def partition.order_iso :
setoid α ≃o {C : set (set α) // is_partition C} :=
{ to_fun := λ r, ⟨r.classes, empty_not_mem_classes, classes_eqv_classes⟩,
inv_fun := λ C, mk_classes C.1 C.2.2,
left_inv := mk_classes_classes,
right_inv := λ C, by rw [subtype.ext_iff_val, ←classes_mk_classes C.1 C.2],
map_rel_iff' := λ r s,
by { conv_rhs { rw [←mk_classes_classes r, ←mk_classes_classes s] }, refl } }
variables {α}
/-- A complete lattice instance for partitions; there is more infrastructure for the
equivalent complete lattice on equivalence relations. -/
instance partition.complete_lattice : complete_lattice (subtype (@is_partition α)) :=
galois_insertion.lift_complete_lattice $ @order_iso.to_galois_insertion
_ (subtype (@is_partition α)) _ (partial_order.to_preorder _) $ partition.order_iso α
end partition
end setoid
/-- Constructive information associated with a partition of a type `α` indexed by another type `ι`,
`s : ι → set α`.
`indexed_partition.index` sends an element to its index, while `indexed_partition.some` sends
an index to an element of the corresponding set.
This type is primarily useful for definitional control of `s` - if this is not needed, then
`setoid.ker index` by itself may be sufficient. -/
structure indexed_partition {ι α : Type*} (s : ι → set α) :=
(eq_of_mem : ∀ {x i j}, x ∈ s i → x ∈ s j → i = j)
(some : ι → α)
(some_mem : ∀ i, some i ∈ s i)
(index : α → ι)
(mem_index : ∀ x, x ∈ s (index x))
/-- The non-constructive constructor for `indexed_partition`. -/
noncomputable
def indexed_partition.mk' {ι α : Type*} (s : ι → set α) (dis : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → disjoint (s i) (s j))
(nonempty : ∀ i, (s i).nonempty) (ex : ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ s i) : indexed_partition s :=
{ eq_of_mem := λ x i j hxi hxj, classical.by_contradiction $ λ h, dis _ _ h ⟨hxi, hxj⟩,
some := λ i, (nonempty i).some,
some_mem := λ i, (nonempty i).some_spec,
index := λ x, (ex x).some,
mem_index := λ x, (ex x).some_spec }
namespace indexed_partition
open set
variables {ι α : Type*} {s : ι → set α} (hs : indexed_partition s)
/-- On a unique index set there is the obvious trivial partition -/
instance [unique ι] [inhabited α] :
inhabited (indexed_partition (λ i : ι, (set.univ : set α))) :=
⟨{ eq_of_mem := λ x i j hi hj, subsingleton.elim _ _,
some := λ i, default α,
some_mem := set.mem_univ,
index := λ a, default ι,
mem_index := set.mem_univ }⟩
attribute [simp] some_mem mem_index
include hs
lemma exists_mem (x : α) : ∃ i, x ∈ s i := ⟨hs.index x, hs.mem_index x⟩
lemma Union : (⋃ i, s i) = univ :=
by { ext x, simp [hs.exists_mem x] }
lemma disjoint : ∀ {i j}, i ≠ j → disjoint (s i) (s j) :=
λ i j h x ⟨hxi, hxj⟩, h (hs.eq_of_mem hxi hxj)
lemma mem_iff_index_eq {x i} : x ∈ s i ↔ hs.index x = i :=
⟨λ hxi, (hs.eq_of_mem hxi (hs.mem_index x)).symm, λ h, h ▸ hs.mem_index _⟩
lemma eq (i) : s i = {x | hs.index x = i} :=
set.ext $ λ _, hs.mem_iff_index_eq
/-- The equivalence relation associated to an indexed partition. Two
elements are equivalent if they belong to the same set of the partition. -/
protected abbreviation setoid (hs : indexed_partition s) : setoid α :=
setoid.ker hs.index
@[simp] lemma index_some (i : ι) : hs.index (hs.some i) = i :=
(mem_iff_index_eq _).1 $ hs.some_mem i
lemma some_index (x : α) : hs.setoid.rel (hs.some (hs.index x)) x :=
hs.index_some (hs.index x)
/-- The quotient associated to an indexed partition. -/
protected def quotient := quotient hs.setoid
/-- The projection onto the quotient associated to an indexed partition. -/
def proj : α → hs.quotient := quotient.mk'
instance [inhabited α] : inhabited (hs.quotient) := ⟨hs.proj (default α)⟩
lemma proj_eq_iff {x y : α} : hs.proj x = hs.proj y ↔ hs.index x = hs.index y :=
quotient.eq_rel
@[simp] lemma proj_some_index (x : α) : hs.proj (hs.some (hs.index x)) = hs.proj x :=
quotient.eq'.2 (hs.some_index x)
/-- The obvious equivalence between the quotient associated to an indexed partition and
the indexing type. -/
def equiv_quotient : ι ≃ hs.quotient :=
(setoid.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse hs.index hs.some $ hs.index_some).symm
@[simp] lemma equiv_quotient_index_apply (x : α) : hs.equiv_quotient (hs.index x) = hs.proj x :=
hs.proj_eq_iff.mpr (some_index hs x)
@[simp] lemma equiv_quotient_symm_proj_apply (x : α) :
hs.equiv_quotient.symm (hs.proj x) = hs.index x :=
rfl
lemma equiv_quotient_index : hs.equiv_quotient ∘ hs.index = hs.proj :=
funext hs.equiv_quotient_index_apply
/-- A map choosing a representative for each element of the quotient associated to an indexed
partition. This is a computable version of `quotient.out'` using `indexed_partition.some`. -/
def out : hs.quotient ↪ α :=
hs.equiv_quotient.symm.to_embedding.trans ⟨hs.some, function.left_inverse.injective hs.index_some⟩
/-- This lemma is analogous to `quotient.mk_out'`. -/
@[simp]
lemma out_proj (x : α) : hs.out (hs.proj x) = hs.some (hs.index x) :=
rfl
/-- The indices of `quotient.out'` and `indexed_partition.out` are equal. -/
lemma index_out' (x : hs.quotient) : hs.index (x.out') = hs.index (hs.out x) :=
quotient.induction_on' x $ λ x, (setoid.ker_apply_mk_out' x).trans (hs.index_some _).symm
/-- This lemma is analogous to `quotient.out_eq'`. -/
@[simp] lemma proj_out (x : hs.quotient) : hs.proj (hs.out x) = x :=
quotient.induction_on' x $ λ x, quotient.sound' $ hs.some_index x
lemma class_of {x : α} : set_of (hs.setoid.rel x) = s (hs.index x) :=
set.ext $ λ y, eq_comm.trans hs.mem_iff_index_eq.symm
lemma proj_fiber (x : hs.quotient) : hs.proj ⁻¹' {x} = s (hs.equiv_quotient.symm x) :=
quotient.induction_on' x $ λ x, begin
ext y,
simp only [set.mem_preimage, set.mem_singleton_iff, hs.mem_iff_index_eq],
exact quotient.eq',
end
end indexed_partition
|
36c6f4159067768f94e4f78a87c86dfdc755af60 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/special_functions/gamma.lean | a090be162a3f6c059aaddef0bb9770c4ba64b08d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 23,778 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import measure_theory.integral.exp_decay
import analysis.calculus.parametric_integral
import analysis.special_functions.integrals
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. In the complex case we also prove that the resulting function is
holomorphic on `ℂ` away from the points `{-n : n ∈ ℤ}`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable theory
open filter interval_integral set real measure_theory asymptotics
open_locale topological_space
lemma integral_exp_neg_Ioi : ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ioi 0, exp (-x) = 1 :=
begin
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (interval_integral_tendsto_integral_Ioi _ _ tendsto_id) _,
{ simpa only [neg_mul, one_mul] using exp_neg_integrable_on_Ioi 0 zero_lt_one, },
{ simpa using tendsto_exp_neg_at_top_nhds_0.const_sub 1, },
end
namespace real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
lemma Gamma_integrand_is_o (s : ℝ) :
(λ x:ℝ, exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[at_top] (λ x:ℝ, exp (-(1/2) * x)) :=
begin
refine is_o_of_tendsto (λ x hx, _) _,
{ exfalso, exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx },
have : (λ (x:ℝ), exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) = (λ (x:ℝ), exp ((1 / 2) * x) / x ^ s )⁻¹,
{ ext1 x,
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← real.exp_add],
left,
ring },
rw this,
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_at_top s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_at_top,
end
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a real variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Gamma_integral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for `0 < s`. -/
def Gamma_integral (s : ℝ) : ℝ := ∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
lemma Gamma_integral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
integrable_on (λ x:ℝ, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) :=
begin
rw [←Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrable_on_union],
split,
{ rw ←integrable_on_Icc_iff_integrable_on_Ioc,
refine integrable_on.continuous_on_mul continuous_on_id.neg.exp _ is_compact_Icc,
refine (interval_integrable_iff_integrable_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp _,
exact interval_integrable_rpow' (by linarith), },
{ refine integrable_of_is_O_exp_neg one_half_pos _ (Gamma_integrand_is_o _ ).is_O,
refine continuous_on_id.neg.exp.mul (continuous_on_id.rpow_const _),
intros x hx,
exact or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne' }
end
lemma Gamma_integral_one : Gamma_integral 1 = 1 :=
by simpa only [Gamma_integral, sub_self, rpow_zero, mul_one] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi
end real
namespace complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(real.exp (-x)), complex.exp (↑(-x)), and complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
lemma Gamma_integral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
integrable_on (λ x, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) :=
begin
split,
{ refine continuous_on.ae_strongly_measurable _ measurable_set_Ioi,
apply (continuous_of_real.comp continuous_neg.exp).continuous_on.mul,
apply continuous_at.continuous_on,
intros x hx,
have : continuous_at (λ x:ℂ, x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x,
{ apply continuous_at_cpow_const, rw of_real_re, exact or.inl hx, },
exact continuous_at.comp this continuous_of_real.continuous_at },
{ rw ←has_finite_integral_norm_iff,
refine has_finite_integral.congr (real.Gamma_integral_convergent hs).2 _,
refine (ae_restrict_iff' measurable_set_Ioi).mpr (ae_of_all _ (λ x hx, _)),
dsimp only,
rw [norm_eq_abs, map_mul, abs_of_nonneg $ le_of_lt $ exp_pos $ -x,
abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _],
simp }
end
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `complex.Gamma_integral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def Gamma_integral (s : ℂ) : ℂ := ∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
lemma Gamma_integral_of_real (s : ℝ) :
Gamma_integral ↑s = ↑(s.Gamma_integral) :=
begin
rw [real.Gamma_integral, ←integral_of_real],
refine set_integral_congr measurable_set_Ioi _,
intros x hx, dsimp only,
rw [of_real_mul, of_real_cpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le],
simp,
end
lemma Gamma_integral_one : Gamma_integral 1 = 1 :=
begin
rw [←of_real_one, Gamma_integral_of_real, of_real_inj],
exact real.Gamma_integral_one,
end
end complex
/-! Now we establish the recurrence relation `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)` using integration by parts. -/
namespace complex
section Gamma_recurrence
/-- The indefinite version of the `Γ` function, `Γ(s, X) = ∫ x ∈ 0..X, exp(-x) x ^ (s - 1)`. -/
def partial_Gamma (s : ℂ) (X : ℝ) : ℂ := ∫ x in 0..X, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
lemma tendsto_partial_Gamma {s : ℂ} (hs: 0 < s.re) :
tendsto (λ X:ℝ, partial_Gamma s X) at_top (𝓝 $ Gamma_integral s) :=
interval_integral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (Gamma_integral_convergent hs) tendsto_id
private lemma Gamma_integrand_interval_integrable (s : ℂ) {X : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s.re) (hX : 0 ≤ X):
interval_integrable (λ x, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X :=
begin
rw interval_integrable_iff_integrable_Ioc_of_le hX,
exact integrable_on.mono_set (Gamma_integral_convergent hs) Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
end
private lemma Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X):
interval_integrable (λ x, -((-x).exp * x ^ s) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X :=
begin
convert (Gamma_integrand_interval_integrable (s+1) _ hX).neg,
{ ext1, simp only [add_sub_cancel, pi.neg_apply] },
{ simp only [add_re, one_re], linarith,},
end
private lemma Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {Y : ℝ} (hY : 0 ≤ Y) :
interval_integrable (λ (x : ℝ), (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 Y :=
begin
have : (λ x, (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(λ x, s * ((-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ),
{ ext1, ring, },
rw [this, interval_integrable_iff_integrable_Ioc_of_le hY],
split,
{ refine (continuous_on_const.mul _).ae_strongly_measurable measurable_set_Ioc,
apply (continuous_of_real.comp continuous_neg.exp).continuous_on.mul,
apply continuous_at.continuous_on,
intros x hx,
refine (_ : continuous_at (λ x:ℂ, x ^ (s - 1)) _).comp continuous_of_real.continuous_at,
apply continuous_at_cpow_const, rw of_real_re, exact or.inl hx.1, },
rw ←has_finite_integral_norm_iff,
simp_rw [norm_eq_abs, map_mul],
refine (((real.Gamma_integral_convergent hs).mono_set
Ioc_subset_Ioi_self).has_finite_integral.congr _).const_mul _,
rw [eventually_eq, ae_restrict_iff'],
{ apply ae_of_all, intros x hx,
rw [abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le,abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1],
simp },
{ exact measurable_set_Ioc},
end
/-- The recurrence relation for the indefinite version of the `Γ` function. -/
lemma partial_Gamma_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs: 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
partial_Gamma (s + 1) X = s * partial_Gamma s X - (-X).exp * X ^ s :=
begin
rw [partial_Gamma, partial_Gamma, add_sub_cancel],
have F_der_I: (∀ (x:ℝ), (x ∈ Ioo 0 X) → has_deriv_at (λ x, (-x).exp * x ^ s : ℝ → ℂ)
( -((-x).exp * x ^ s) + (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1))) x),
{ intros x hx,
have d1 : has_deriv_at (λ (y: ℝ), (-y).exp) (-(-x).exp) x,
{ simpa using (has_deriv_at_neg x).exp },
have d1b : has_deriv_at (λ y, ↑(-y).exp : ℝ → ℂ) (↑-(-x).exp) x,
{ convert has_deriv_at.scomp x of_real_clm.has_deriv_at d1, simp, },
have d2: has_deriv_at (λ (y : ℝ), ↑y ^ s) (s * x ^ (s - 1)) x,
{ have t := @has_deriv_at.cpow_const _ _ _ s (has_deriv_at_id ↑x),
simp only [id.def, of_real_re, of_real_im,
ne.def, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, or_false, mul_one] at t,
simpa using has_deriv_at.comp x (t hx.left) of_real_clm.has_deriv_at, },
simpa only [of_real_neg, neg_mul] using d1b.mul d2 },
have cont := (continuous_of_real.comp continuous_neg.exp).mul
(continuous_of_real_cpow_const hs),
have der_ible := (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX).add
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX),
have int_eval := integral_eq_sub_of_has_deriv_at_of_le hX cont.continuous_on F_der_I der_ible,
-- We are basically done here but manipulating the output into the right form is fiddly.
apply_fun (λ x:ℂ, -x) at int_eval,
rw [interval_integral.integral_add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX)
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX), interval_integral.integral_neg, neg_add, neg_neg]
at int_eval,
replace int_eval := eq_sub_of_add_eq int_eval,
rw [int_eval, sub_neg_eq_add, neg_sub, add_comm, add_sub],
simp only [sub_left_inj, add_left_inj],
have : (λ x, (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) = (λ x, s * (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ),
{ ext1, ring,},
rw this,
have t := @integral_const_mul (0:ℝ) X volume _ _ s (λ x:ℝ, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)),
dsimp at t, rw [←t, of_real_zero, zero_cpow],
{ rw [mul_zero, add_zero], congr', ext1, ring },
{ contrapose! hs, rw [hs, zero_re] }
end
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` integral. -/
theorem Gamma_integral_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs: 0 < s.re) :
Gamma_integral (s + 1) = s * Gamma_integral s :=
begin
suffices : tendsto (s+1).partial_Gamma at_top (𝓝 $ s * Gamma_integral s),
{ refine tendsto_nhds_unique _ this,
apply tendsto_partial_Gamma, rw [add_re, one_re], linarith, },
have : (λ X:ℝ, s * partial_Gamma s X - X ^ s * (-X).exp) =ᶠ[at_top] (s+1).partial_Gamma,
{ apply eventually_eq_of_mem (Ici_mem_at_top (0:ℝ)),
intros X hX,
rw partial_Gamma_add_one hs (mem_Ici.mp hX),
ring_nf, },
refine tendsto.congr' this _,
suffices : tendsto (λ X, -X ^ s * (-X).exp : ℝ → ℂ) at_top (𝓝 0),
{ simpa using tendsto.add (tendsto.const_mul s (tendsto_partial_Gamma hs)) this },
rw tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero,
have : (λ (e : ℝ), ‖-(e:ℂ) ^ s * (-e).exp‖ ) =ᶠ[at_top] (λ (e : ℝ), e ^ s.re * (-1 * e).exp ),
{ refine eventually_eq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_at_top 0) _,
intros x hx, dsimp only,
rw [norm_eq_abs, map_mul, abs.map_neg, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos(-x)).le, neg_mul, one_mul],},
exact (tendsto_congr' this).mpr (tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_at_top_nhds_0 _ _ zero_lt_one),
end
end Gamma_recurrence
/-! Now we define `Γ(s)` on the whole complex plane, by recursion. -/
section Gamma_def
/-- The `n`th function in this family is `Γ(s)` if `-n < s.re`, and junk otherwise. -/
noncomputable def Gamma_aux : ℕ → (ℂ → ℂ)
| 0 := Gamma_integral
| (n+1) := λ s:ℂ, (Gamma_aux n (s+1)) / s
lemma Gamma_aux_recurrence1 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
Gamma_aux n s = Gamma_aux n (s+1) / s :=
begin
induction n with n hn generalizing s,
{ simp only [nat.cast_zero, neg_lt_zero] at h1,
dsimp only [Gamma_aux], rw Gamma_integral_add_one h1,
rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel], contrapose! h1, rw h1,
simp },
{ dsimp only [Gamma_aux],
have hh1 : -(s+1).re < n,
{ rw [nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.cast_add, nat.cast_one] at h1,
rw [add_re, one_re], linarith, },
rw ←(hn (s+1) hh1) }
end
lemma Gamma_aux_recurrence2 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
Gamma_aux n s = Gamma_aux (n+1) s :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp only [nat.cast_zero, neg_lt_zero] at h1,
dsimp only [Gamma_aux],
rw [Gamma_integral_add_one h1, mul_div_cancel_left],
rintro rfl,
rw [zero_re] at h1,
exact h1.false },
{ dsimp only [Gamma_aux],
have : (Gamma_aux n (s + 1 + 1)) / (s+1) = Gamma_aux n (s + 1),
{ have hh1 : -(s+1).re < n,
{ rw [nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.cast_add, nat.cast_one] at h1,
rw [add_re, one_re], linarith, },
rw Gamma_aux_recurrence1 (s+1) n hh1, },
rw this },
end
/-- The `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`). -/
@[pp_nodot] def Gamma (s : ℂ) : ℂ := Gamma_aux ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ s
lemma Gamma_eq_Gamma_aux (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) : Gamma s = Gamma_aux n s :=
begin
have u : ∀ (k : ℕ), Gamma_aux (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) s = Gamma s,
{ intro k, induction k with k hk,
{ simp [Gamma],},
{ rw [←hk, nat.succ_eq_add_one, ←add_assoc],
refine (Gamma_aux_recurrence2 s (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) _).symm,
rw nat.cast_add,
have i0 := nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re),
simp only [sub_sub_cancel_left] at i0,
refine lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg i0 _,
rw [←nat.cast_zero, nat.cast_le], exact nat.zero_le k, } },
convert (u $ n - ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊).symm, rw nat.add_sub_of_le,
by_cases (0 ≤ 1 - s.re),
{ apply nat.le_of_lt_succ,
exact_mod_cast lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.floor_le h) (by linarith : 1 - s.re < n + 1) },
{ rw nat.floor_of_nonpos, linarith, linarith },
end
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` function. -/
theorem Gamma_add_one (s : ℂ) (h2 : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s+1) = s * Gamma s :=
begin
let n := ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊,
have t1 : -s.re < n,
{ simpa only [sub_sub_cancel_left] using nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re) },
have t2 : -(s+1).re < n,
{ rw [add_re, one_re], linarith, },
rw [Gamma_eq_Gamma_aux s n t1, Gamma_eq_Gamma_aux (s+1) n t2, Gamma_aux_recurrence1 s n t1],
field_simp, ring,
end
theorem Gamma_eq_integral (s : ℂ) (hs : 0 < s.re) : Gamma s = Gamma_integral s :=
Gamma_eq_Gamma_aux s 0 (by { norm_cast, linarith })
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n+1) = nat.factorial n :=
begin
induction n with n hn,
{ rw [nat.cast_zero, zero_add], rw Gamma_eq_integral,
simpa using Gamma_integral_one, simp,},
rw (Gamma_add_one n.succ $ nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr $ nat.succ_ne_zero n),
{ simp only [nat.cast_succ, nat.factorial_succ, nat.cast_mul], congr, exact hn },
end
end Gamma_def
end complex
/-! Now check that the `Γ` function is differentiable, wherever this makes sense. -/
section Gamma_has_deriv
/-- Integrand for the derivative of the `Γ` function -/
def dGamma_integrand (s : ℂ) (x : ℝ) : ℂ := exp (-x) * log x * x ^ (s - 1)
/-- Integrand for the absolute value of the derivative of the `Γ` function -/
def dGamma_integrand_real (s x : ℝ) : ℝ := |exp (-x) * log x * x ^ (s - 1)|
lemma dGamma_integrand_is_o_at_top (s : ℝ) :
(λ x : ℝ, exp (-x) * log x * x ^ (s - 1)) =o[at_top] (λ x, exp (-(1/2) * x)) :=
begin
refine is_o_of_tendsto (λ x hx, _) _,
{ exfalso, exact (-(1/2) * x).exp_pos.ne' hx, },
have : eventually_eq at_top (λ (x : ℝ), exp (-x) * log x * x ^ (s - 1) / exp (-(1 / 2) * x))
(λ (x : ℝ), (λ z:ℝ, exp (1 / 2 * z) / z ^ s) x * (λ z:ℝ, z / log z) x)⁻¹,
{ refine eventually_of_mem (Ioi_mem_at_top 1) _,
intros x hx, dsimp,
replace hx := lt_trans zero_lt_one (mem_Ioi.mp hx),
rw [real.exp_neg, neg_mul, real.exp_neg, rpow_sub hx],
have : exp x = exp(x/2) * exp(x/2),
{ rw [←real.exp_add, add_halves], },
rw this, field_simp [hx.ne', exp_ne_zero (x/2)], ring, },
refine tendsto.congr' this.symm (tendsto.inv_tendsto_at_top _),
apply tendsto.at_top_mul_at_top (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_at_top s (1/2) one_half_pos),
refine tendsto.congr' _ ((tendsto_exp_div_pow_at_top 1).comp tendsto_log_at_top),
apply eventually_eq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_at_top (0:ℝ)),
intros x hx, simp [exp_log hx],
end
/-- Absolute convergence of the integral which will give the derivative of the `Γ` function on
`1 < re s`. -/
lemma dGamma_integral_abs_convergent (s : ℝ) (hs : 1 < s) :
integrable_on (λ x:ℝ, ‖exp (-x) * log x * x ^ (s-1)‖) (Ioi 0) :=
begin
rw [←Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrable_on_union],
refine ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩,
{ refine continuous_on.ae_strongly_measurable (continuous_on.mul _ _).norm measurable_set_Ioc,
{ refine (continuous_exp.comp continuous_neg).continuous_on.mul (continuous_on_log.mono _),
simp, },
{ apply continuous_on_id.rpow_const, intros x hx, right, linarith }, },
{ apply has_finite_integral_of_bounded,
swap, { exact 1 / (s - 1), },
refine (ae_restrict_iff' measurable_set_Ioc).mpr (ae_of_all _ (λ x hx, _)),
rw [norm_norm, norm_eq_abs, mul_assoc, abs_mul, ←one_mul (1 / (s - 1))],
refine mul_le_mul _ _ (abs_nonneg _) zero_le_one,
{ rw [abs_of_pos (exp_pos(-x)), exp_le_one_iff, neg_le, neg_zero], exact hx.1.le },
{ exact (abs_log_mul_self_rpow_lt x (s-1) hx.1 hx.2 (sub_pos.mpr hs)).le }, },
{ have := (dGamma_integrand_is_o_at_top s).is_O.norm_left,
refine integrable_of_is_O_exp_neg one_half_pos (continuous_on.mul _ _).norm this,
{ refine (continuous_exp.comp continuous_neg).continuous_on.mul (continuous_on_log.mono _),
simp, },
{ apply continuous_at.continuous_on (λ x hx, _),
apply continuous_at_id.rpow continuous_at_const,
dsimp, right, linarith, }, }
end
/-- A uniform bound for the `s`-derivative of the `Γ` integrand for `s` in vertical strips. -/
lemma loc_unif_bound_dGamma_integrand {t : ℂ} {s1 s2 x : ℝ} (ht1 : s1 ≤ t.re)
(ht2: t.re ≤ s2) (hx : 0 < x) :
‖dGamma_integrand t x‖ ≤ dGamma_integrand_real s1 x + dGamma_integrand_real s2 x :=
begin
rcases le_or_lt 1 x with h|h,
{ -- case 1 ≤ x
refine le_add_of_nonneg_of_le (abs_nonneg _) _,
rw [dGamma_integrand, dGamma_integrand_real, complex.norm_eq_abs, map_mul, abs_mul,
←complex.of_real_mul, complex.abs_of_real],
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (abs_nonneg _),
rw complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
refine le_trans _ (le_abs_self _),
apply rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le h,
rw [complex.sub_re, complex.one_re], linarith, },
{ refine le_add_of_le_of_nonneg _ (abs_nonneg _),
rw [dGamma_integrand, dGamma_integrand_real, complex.norm_eq_abs, map_mul, abs_mul,
←complex.of_real_mul, complex.abs_of_real],
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (abs_nonneg _),
rw complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
refine le_trans _ (le_abs_self _),
apply rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx h.le,
rw [complex.sub_re, complex.one_re], linarith, },
end
namespace complex
/-- The derivative of the `Γ` integral, at any `s ∈ ℂ` with `1 < re s`, is given by the integral
of `exp (-x) * log x * x ^ (s - 1)` over `[0, ∞)`. -/
theorem has_deriv_at_Gamma_integral {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < s.re) :
(integrable_on (λ x, real.exp (-x) * real.log x * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) volume) ∧
(has_deriv_at Gamma_integral (∫ x:ℝ in Ioi 0, real.exp (-x) * real.log x * x ^ (s - 1)) s) :=
begin
let ε := (s.re - 1) / 2,
let μ := volume.restrict (Ioi (0:ℝ)),
let bound := (λ x:ℝ, dGamma_integrand_real (s.re - ε) x + dGamma_integrand_real (s.re + ε) x),
have cont : ∀ (t : ℂ), continuous_on (λ x, real.exp (-x) * x ^ (t - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0),
{ intro t, apply (continuous_of_real.comp continuous_neg.exp).continuous_on.mul,
apply continuous_at.continuous_on, intros x hx,
refine (continuous_at_cpow_const _).comp continuous_of_real.continuous_at,
exact or.inl hx, },
have eps_pos: 0 < ε := div_pos (sub_pos.mpr hs) zero_lt_two,
have hF_meas : ∀ᶠ (t : ℂ) in 𝓝 s,
ae_strongly_measurable (λ x, real.exp(-x) * x ^ (t - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) μ,
{ apply eventually_of_forall, intro t,
exact (cont t).ae_strongly_measurable measurable_set_Ioi, },
have hF'_meas : ae_strongly_measurable (dGamma_integrand s) μ,
{ refine continuous_on.ae_strongly_measurable _ measurable_set_Ioi,
have : dGamma_integrand s = (λ x, real.exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) * real.log x : ℝ → ℂ),
{ ext1, simp only [dGamma_integrand], ring },
rw this,
refine continuous_on.mul (cont s) (continuous_at.continuous_on _),
exact λ x hx, continuous_of_real.continuous_at.comp (continuous_at_log (mem_Ioi.mp hx).ne'), },
have h_bound : ∀ᵐ (x : ℝ) ∂μ, ∀ (t : ℂ), t ∈ metric.ball s ε → ‖ dGamma_integrand t x ‖ ≤ bound x,
{ refine (ae_restrict_iff' measurable_set_Ioi).mpr (ae_of_all _ (λ x hx, _)),
intros t ht,
rw [metric.mem_ball, complex.dist_eq] at ht,
replace ht := lt_of_le_of_lt (complex.abs_re_le_abs $ t - s ) ht,
rw [complex.sub_re, @abs_sub_lt_iff ℝ _ t.re s.re ((s.re - 1) / 2) ] at ht,
refine loc_unif_bound_dGamma_integrand _ _ hx,
all_goals { simp only [ε], linarith } },
have bound_integrable : integrable bound μ,
{ apply integrable.add,
{ refine dGamma_integral_abs_convergent (s.re - ε) _,
field_simp, rw one_lt_div,
{ linarith }, { exact zero_lt_two }, },
{ refine dGamma_integral_abs_convergent (s.re + ε) _, linarith, }, },
have h_diff : ∀ᵐ (x : ℝ) ∂μ, ∀ (t : ℂ), t ∈ metric.ball s ε
→ has_deriv_at (λ u, real.exp (-x) * x ^ (u - 1) : ℂ → ℂ) (dGamma_integrand t x) t,
{ refine (ae_restrict_iff' measurable_set_Ioi).mpr (ae_of_all _ (λ x hx, _)),
intros t ht, rw mem_Ioi at hx,
simp only [dGamma_integrand],
rw mul_assoc,
apply has_deriv_at.const_mul,
rw [of_real_log hx.le, mul_comm],
have := ((has_deriv_at_id t).sub_const 1).const_cpow (or.inl (of_real_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne')),
rwa mul_one at this },
exact (has_deriv_at_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_deriv_le eps_pos hF_meas
(Gamma_integral_convergent (zero_lt_one.trans hs)) hF'_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_diff),
end
lemma differentiable_at_Gamma_aux (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : (1 - s.re) < n ) (h2 : ∀ m:ℕ, s + m ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at ℂ (Gamma_aux n) s :=
begin
induction n with n hn generalizing s,
{ refine (has_deriv_at_Gamma_integral _).2.differentiable_at,
rw nat.cast_zero at h1, linarith },
{ dsimp only [Gamma_aux],
specialize hn (s + 1),
have a : 1 - (s + 1).re < ↑n,
{ rw nat.cast_succ at h1, rw [complex.add_re, complex.one_re], linarith },
have b : ∀ m:ℕ, s + 1 + m ≠ 0,
{ intro m, have := h2 (1 + m), rwa [nat.cast_add, nat.cast_one, ←add_assoc] at this },
refine differentiable_at.div (differentiable_at.comp _ (hn a b) _) _ _,
simp, simp, simpa using h2 0 }
end
theorem differentiable_at_Gamma (s : ℂ) (hs : ∀ m:ℕ, s + m ≠ 0) : differentiable_at ℂ Gamma s :=
begin
let n := ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + 1,
have hn : 1 - s.re < n := by exact_mod_cast nat.lt_floor_add_one (1 - s.re),
apply (differentiable_at_Gamma_aux s n hn hs).congr_of_eventually_eq,
let S := { t : ℂ | 1 - t.re < n },
have : S ∈ 𝓝 s,
{ rw mem_nhds_iff, use S,
refine ⟨subset.rfl, _, hn⟩,
have : S = re⁻¹' Ioi (1 - n : ℝ),
{ ext, rw [preimage,Ioi, mem_set_of_eq, mem_set_of_eq, mem_set_of_eq], exact sub_lt_comm },
rw this,
refine continuous.is_open_preimage continuous_re _ is_open_Ioi, },
apply eventually_eq_of_mem this,
intros t ht, rw mem_set_of_eq at ht,
apply Gamma_eq_Gamma_aux, linarith,
end
end complex
end Gamma_has_deriv
|
f578439f0e326ad9d56cdaaade97ec238d88e864 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/data/multiset/lattice.lean | 1ed7e108374c89337d38bf800aec73d7efed633f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,153 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.multiset.finset_ops
import data.multiset.fold
/-!
# Lattice operations on multisets
-/
namespace multiset
variables {α : Type*}
/-! ### sup -/
section sup
-- can be defined with just `[has_bot α]` where some lemmas hold without requiring `[order_bot α]`
variables [semilattice_sup α] [order_bot α]
/-- Supremum of a multiset: `sup {a, b, c} = a ⊔ b ⊔ c` -/
def sup (s : multiset α) : α := s.fold (⊔) ⊥
@[simp] lemma sup_coe (l : list α) : sup (l : multiset α) = l.foldr (⊔) ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma sup_zero : (0 : multiset α).sup = ⊥ :=
fold_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma sup_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(a ::ₘ s).sup = a ⊔ s.sup :=
fold_cons_left _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sup_singleton {a : α} : ({a} : multiset α).sup = a :=
sup_bot_eq
@[simp] lemma sup_add (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) : (s₁ + s₂).sup = s₁.sup ⊔ s₂.sup :=
eq.trans (by simp [sup]) (fold_add _ _ _ _ _)
lemma sup_le {s : multiset α} {a : α} : s.sup ≤ a ↔ (∀b ∈ s, b ≤ a) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib] {contextual := tt})
lemma le_sup {s : multiset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ≤ s.sup :=
sup_le.1 le_rfl _ h
lemma sup_mono {s₁ s₂ : multiset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.sup ≤ s₂.sup :=
sup_le.2 $ assume b hb, le_sup (h hb)
variables [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] lemma sup_dedup (s : multiset α) : (dedup s).sup = s.sup :=
fold_dedup_idem _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sup_ndunion (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(ndunion s₁ s₂).sup = s₁.sup ⊔ s₂.sup :=
by rw [← sup_dedup, dedup_ext.2, sup_dedup, sup_add]; simp
@[simp] lemma sup_union (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).sup = s₁.sup ⊔ s₂.sup :=
by rw [← sup_dedup, dedup_ext.2, sup_dedup, sup_add]; simp
@[simp] lemma sup_ndinsert (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(ndinsert a s).sup = a ⊔ s.sup :=
by rw [← sup_dedup, dedup_ext.2, sup_dedup, sup_cons]; simp
lemma nodup_sup_iff {α : Type*} [decidable_eq α] {m : multiset (multiset α) } :
m.sup.nodup ↔ ∀ (a : multiset α), a ∈ m → a.nodup :=
begin
apply m.induction_on,
{ simp },
{ intros a s h,
simp [h] }
end
end sup
/-! ### inf -/
section inf
-- can be defined with just `[has_top α]` where some lemmas hold without requiring `[order_top α]`
variables [semilattice_inf α] [order_top α]
/-- Infimum of a multiset: `inf {a, b, c} = a ⊓ b ⊓ c` -/
def inf (s : multiset α) : α := s.fold (⊓) ⊤
@[simp] lemma inf_coe (l : list α) : inf (l : multiset α) = l.foldr (⊓) ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] lemma inf_zero : (0 : multiset α).inf = ⊤ :=
fold_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma inf_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(a ::ₘ s).inf = a ⊓ s.inf :=
fold_cons_left _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma inf_singleton {a : α} : ({a} : multiset α).inf = a :=
inf_top_eq
@[simp] lemma inf_add (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) : (s₁ + s₂).inf = s₁.inf ⊓ s₂.inf :=
eq.trans (by simp [inf]) (fold_add _ _ _ _ _)
lemma le_inf {s : multiset α} {a : α} : a ≤ s.inf ↔ (∀b ∈ s, a ≤ b) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib] {contextual := tt})
lemma inf_le {s : multiset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.inf ≤ a :=
le_inf.1 le_rfl _ h
lemma inf_mono {s₁ s₂ : multiset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂.inf ≤ s₁.inf :=
le_inf.2 $ assume b hb, inf_le (h hb)
variables [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] lemma inf_dedup (s : multiset α) : (dedup s).inf = s.inf :=
fold_dedup_idem _ _ _
@[simp] lemma inf_ndunion (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(ndunion s₁ s₂).inf = s₁.inf ⊓ s₂.inf :=
by rw [← inf_dedup, dedup_ext.2, inf_dedup, inf_add]; simp
@[simp] lemma inf_union (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).inf = s₁.inf ⊓ s₂.inf :=
by rw [← inf_dedup, dedup_ext.2, inf_dedup, inf_add]; simp
@[simp] lemma inf_ndinsert (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(ndinsert a s).inf = a ⊓ s.inf :=
by rw [← inf_dedup, dedup_ext.2, inf_dedup, inf_cons]; simp
end inf
end multiset
|
c0d0b6c1d242f58fbccf828343f92862e33cc966 | ce6917c5bacabee346655160b74a307b4a5ab620 | /src/ch4/ex0401.lean | b63843db055ad39a42f0639b6bb2884366243c8b | [] | no_license | Ailrun/Theorem_Proving_in_Lean | ae6a23f3c54d62d401314d6a771e8ff8b4132db2 | 2eb1b5caf93c6a5a555c79e9097cf2ba5a66cf68 | refs/heads/master | 1,609,838,270,467 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 240,967,761 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 301 | lean | open nat
example : ∃ x : ℕ, x > 0 :=
have h : 1 > 0, from zero_lt_succ 0,
exists.intro 1 h
example (x : ℕ) (h : x > 0) : ∃ y, y < x :=
exists.intro 0 h
example (x y z : ℕ) (hxy : x < y) (hyz : y < z) :
∃ w, x < w ∧ w < z :=
exists.intro y (and.intro hxy hyz)
#check @exists.intro
|
67e034a0492e754185fdbf73db1fd1290ccb4f25 | 26bff4ed296b8373c92b6b025f5d60cdf02104b9 | /hott/arity.hlean | 58ed580f158072d2e041466495d74a7d9e650c83 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | guiquanz/lean | b8a878ea24f237b84b0e6f6be2f300e8bf028229 | 242f8ba0486860e53e257c443e965a82ee342db3 | refs/heads/master | 1,526,680,092,098 | 1,427,492,833,000 | 1,427,493,281,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,314 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Module: init.path
Author: Floris van Doorn
Theorems about functions with multiple arguments
-/
variables {A U V W X Y Z : Type} {B : A → Type} {C : Πa, B a → Type} {D : Πa b, C a b → Type}
{E : Πa b c, D a b c → Type}
variables {a a' : A} {u u' : U} {v v' : V} {w w' : W} {x x' x'' : X} {y y' : Y}
{b : B a} {b' : B a'}
{c : C a b} {c' : C a' b'}
{d : D a b c} {d' : D a' b' c'}
namespace eq
/-
Naming convention:
The theorem which states how to construct an path between two function applications is
api₀i₁...iₙ.
Here i₀, ... iₙ are digits, n is the arity of the function(s),
and iⱼ specifies the dimension of the path between the jᵗʰ argument
(i₀ specifies the dimension of the path between the functions).
A value iⱼ ≡ 0 means that the jᵗʰ arguments are definitionally equal
The functions are non-dependent, except when the theorem name contains trailing zeroes
(where the function is dependent only in the arguments where it doesn't result in any
transports in the theorem statement).
For the fully-dependent versions (except that the conclusion doesn't contain a transport)
we write
apDi₀i₁...iₙ.
For versions where only some arguments depend on some other arguments,
or for versions with transport in the conclusion (like apD), we don't have a
consistent naming scheme (yet).
We don't prove each theorem systematically, but prove only the ones which we actually need.
-/
definition homotopy2 [reducible] (f g : Πa b, C a b) : Type :=
Πa b, f a b = g a b
definition homotopy3 [reducible] (f g : Πa b c, D a b c) : Type :=
Πa b c, f a b c = g a b c
definition homotopy4 [reducible] (f g : Πa b c d, E a b c d) : Type :=
Πa b c d, f a b c d = g a b c d
notation f `∼2`:50 g := homotopy2 f g
notation f `∼3`:50 g := homotopy3 f g
definition ap011 (f : U → V → W) (Hu : u = u') (Hv : v = v') : f u v = f u' v' :=
eq.rec_on Hu (ap (f u) Hv)
definition ap0111 (f : U → V → W → X) (Hu : u = u') (Hv : v = v') (Hw : w = w')
: f u v w = f u' v' w' :=
eq.rec_on Hu (ap011 (f u) Hv Hw)
definition ap01111 (f : U → V → W → X → Y) (Hu : u = u') (Hv : v = v') (Hw : w = w') (Hx : x = x')
: f u v w x = f u' v' w' x' :=
eq.rec_on Hu (ap0111 (f u) Hv Hw Hx)
definition ap010 (f : X → Πa, B a) (Hx : x = x') : f x ∼ f x' :=
λa, eq.rec_on Hx idp
definition ap0100 (f : X → Πa b, C a b) (Hx : x = x') : f x ∼2 f x' :=
λa b, eq.rec_on Hx idp
definition ap01000 (f : X → Πa b c, D a b c) (Hx : x = x') : f x ∼3 f x' :=
λa b c, eq.rec_on Hx idp
definition apD011 (f : Πa, B a → Z) (Ha : a = a') (Hb : (Ha ▹ b) = b')
: f a b = f a' b' :=
eq.rec_on Hb (eq.rec_on Ha idp)
definition apD0111 (f : Πa b, C a b → Z) (Ha : a = a') (Hb : (Ha ▹ b) = b')
(Hc : apD011 C Ha Hb ▹ c = c')
: f a b c = f a' b' c' :=
eq.rec_on Hc (eq.rec_on Hb (eq.rec_on Ha idp))
definition apD01111 (f : Πa b c, D a b c → Z) (Ha : a = a') (Hb : (Ha ▹ b) = b')
(Hc : apD011 C Ha Hb ▹ c = c') (Hd : apD0111 D Ha Hb Hc ▹ d = d')
: f a b c d = f a' b' c' d' :=
eq.rec_on Hd (eq.rec_on Hc (eq.rec_on Hb (eq.rec_on Ha idp)))
definition apD100 {f g : Πa b, C a b} (p : f = g) : f ∼2 g :=
λa b, apD10 (apD10 p a) b
definition apD1000 {f g : Πa b c, D a b c} (p : f = g) : f ∼3 g :=
λa b c, apD100 (apD10 p a) b c
/- some properties of these variants of ap -/
-- we only prove what is needed somewhere
definition ap010_con (f : X → Πa, B a) (p : x = x') (q : x' = x'') :
ap010 f (p ⬝ q) a = ap010 f p a ⬝ ap010 f q a :=
eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp)
definition ap010_ap (f : X → Πa, B a) (g : Y → X) (p : y = y') :
ap010 f (ap g p) a = ap010 (λy, f (g y)) p a :=
eq.rec_on p idp
/- the following theorems are function extentionality for functions with multiple arguments -/
definition eq_of_homotopy2 {f g : Πa b, C a b} (H : f ∼2 g) : f = g :=
eq_of_homotopy (λa, eq_of_homotopy (H a))
definition eq_of_homotopy3 {f g : Πa b c, D a b c} (H : f ∼3 g) : f = g :=
eq_of_homotopy (λa, eq_of_homotopy2 (H a))
definition eq_of_homotopy2_id (f : Πa b, C a b)
: eq_of_homotopy2 (λa b, idpath (f a b)) = idpath f :=
begin
apply concat,
{apply (ap (λx, eq_of_homotopy x)), apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a, apply eq_of_homotopy_id},
apply eq_of_homotopy_id
end
definition eq_of_homotopy3_id (f : Πa b c, D a b c)
: eq_of_homotopy3 (λa b c, idpath (f a b c)) = idpath f :=
begin
apply concat,
{apply (ap (λx, eq_of_homotopy x)), apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a, apply eq_of_homotopy2_id},
apply eq_of_homotopy_id
end
end eq
open eq is_equiv
namespace funext
definition is_equiv_apD100 [instance] (f g : Πa b, C a b) : is_equiv (@apD100 A B C f g) :=
adjointify _
eq_of_homotopy2
begin
intro H, esimp {apD100,eq_of_homotopy2, function.compose},
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a,
apply concat, apply (ap (λx, @apD10 _ (λb : B a, _) _ _ (x a))), apply (retr apD10),
--TODO: remove implicit argument after #469 is closed
apply (retr apD10)
end
begin
intro p, cases p, apply eq_of_homotopy2_id
end
definition is_equiv_apD1000 [instance] (f g : Πa b c, D a b c)
: is_equiv (@apD1000 A B C D f g) :=
adjointify _
eq_of_homotopy3
begin
intro H, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a,
apply concat,
{apply (ap (λx, @apD100 _ _ (λ(b : B a)(c : C a b), _) _ _ (x a))),
apply (retr apD10)},
--TODO: remove implicit argument after #469 is closed
apply (@retr _ _ apD100 !is_equiv_apD100) --is explicit argument needed here?
end
begin
intro p, cases p, apply eq_of_homotopy3_id
end
end funext
namespace eq
open funext
local attribute funext.is_equiv_apD100 [instance]
protected definition homotopy2.rec_on {f g : Πa b, C a b} {P : (f ∼2 g) → Type}
(p : f ∼2 g) (H : Π(q : f = g), P (apD100 q)) : P p :=
retr apD100 p ▹ H (eq_of_homotopy2 p)
protected definition homotopy3.rec_on {f g : Πa b c, D a b c} {P : (f ∼3 g) → Type}
(p : f ∼3 g) (H : Π(q : f = g), P (apD1000 q)) : P p :=
retr apD1000 p ▹ H (eq_of_homotopy3 p)
definition apD10_ap (f : X → Πa, B a) (p : x = x')
: apD10 (ap f p) = ap010 f p :=
eq.rec_on p idp
definition eq_of_homotopy_ap010 (f : X → Πa, B a) (p : x = x')
: eq_of_homotopy (ap010 f p) = ap f p :=
inv_eq_of_eq !apD10_ap⁻¹
definition ap_eq_ap_of_homotopy {f : X → Πa, B a} {p q : x = x'} (H : ap010 f p ∼ ap010 f q)
: ap f p = ap f q :=
calc
ap f p = eq_of_homotopy (ap010 f p) : eq_of_homotopy_ap010
... = eq_of_homotopy (ap010 f q) : eq_of_homotopy H
... = ap f q : eq_of_homotopy_ap010
end eq
|
b17780cbd66a3242065b40d91b93c6aa305b447d | 43390109ab88557e6090f3245c47479c123ee500 | /src/M1F/problem_bank/0502/S0502.lean | d7a0d0603bb3dbf4973ba091da5262645975deb0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Ja1941/xena-UROP-2018 | 41f0956519f94d56b8bf6834a8d39473f4923200 | b111fb87f343cf79eca3b886f99ee15c1dd9884b | refs/heads/master | 1,662,355,955,139 | 1,590,577,325,000 | 1,590,577,325,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 944 | lean | import algebra.group_power tactic.norm_num algebra.big_operators
theorem Q2 (n : ℕ) : n ≥ 2 → nat.pow 4 n > nat.pow 3 n + nat.pow 2 n :=
begin
intro H_n_ge_2,
cases n with n1,
exfalso,revert H_n_ge_2, exact dec_trivial,
cases n1 with n2,
exfalso,revert H_n_ge_2, exact dec_trivial,
clear H_n_ge_2,
induction n2 with d Hd,
exact dec_trivial,
let e := nat.succ (nat.succ d),
show nat.pow 4 e*4>nat.pow 3 e*3+nat.pow 2 e*2,
change nat.pow 4 (nat.succ (nat.succ d)) > nat.pow 3 (nat.succ (nat.succ d)) + nat.pow 2 (nat.succ (nat.succ d))
with nat.pow 4 e>nat.pow 3 e+nat.pow 2 e at Hd,
exact calc
nat.pow 4 e * 4 > (nat.pow 3 e + nat.pow 2 e) * 4 : mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right Hd (dec_trivial)
... = nat.pow 3 e*4+nat.pow 2 e*4 : add_mul _ _ _
... ≥ nat.pow 3 e*3+nat.pow 2 e*4 : add_le_add_right (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (dec_trivial)) _
... ≥ nat.pow 3 e*3+nat.pow 2 e*2 : add_le_add_left (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (dec_trivial)) _,
end
|
e55fdb7f3195c2f5353a6a451e33b7bf95448c55 | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/topology/algebra/module.lean | 27934b72e413a0cd577aa5d531bdb3057141fe34 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 41,779 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import topology.algebra.ring
import topology.uniform_space.uniform_embedding
import ring_theory.algebra
import linear_algebra.projection
/-!
# Theory of topological modules and continuous linear maps.
We define classes `topological_semimodule`, `topological_module` and `topological_vector_spaces`,
as extensions of the corresponding algebraic classes where the algebraic operations are continuous.
We also define continuous linear maps, as linear maps between topological modules which are
continuous. The set of continuous linear maps between the topological `R`-modules `M` and `M₂` is
denoted by `M →L[R] M₂`.
Continuous linear equivalences are denoted by `M ≃L[R] M₂`.
## Implementation notes
Topological vector spaces are defined as an `abbreviation` for topological modules,
if the base ring is a field. This has as advantage that topological vector spaces are completely
transparent for type class inference, which means that all instances for topological modules
are immediately picked up for vector spaces as well.
A cosmetic disadvantage is that one can not extend topological vector spaces.
The solution is to extend `topological_module` instead.
-/
open filter
open_locale topological_space big_operators
universes u v w u'
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A topological semimodule, over a semiring which is also a topological space, is a
semimodule in which scalar multiplication is continuous. In applications, R will be a topological
semiring and M a topological additive semigroup, but this is not needed for the definition -/
class topological_semimodule (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[semiring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
[semimodule R M] : Prop :=
(continuous_smul : continuous (λp : R × M, p.1 • p.2))
end prio
section
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
[semiring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
[semimodule R M] [topological_semimodule R M]
lemma continuous_smul : continuous (λp:R×M, p.1 • p.2) :=
topological_semimodule.continuous_smul
lemma continuous.smul {α : Type*} [topological_space α] {f : α → R} {g : α → M}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λp, f p • g p) :=
continuous_smul.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
lemma tendsto_smul {c : R} {x : M} : tendsto (λp:R×M, p.fst • p.snd) (𝓝 (c, x)) (𝓝 (c • x)) :=
continuous_smul.tendsto _
lemma filter.tendsto.smul {α : Type*} {l : filter α} {f : α → R} {g : α → M} {c : R} {x : M}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 c)) (hg : tendsto g l (𝓝 x)) : tendsto (λ a, f a • g a) l (𝓝 (c • x)) :=
tendsto_smul.comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
end
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A topological module, over a ring which is also a topological space, is a module in which
scalar multiplication is continuous. In applications, `R` will be a topological ring and `M` a
topological additive group, but this is not needed for the definition -/
class topological_module (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[ring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[module R M]
extends topological_semimodule R M : Prop
/-- A topological vector space is a topological module over a field. -/
abbreviation topological_vector_space (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[field R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] :=
topological_module R M
end prio
section
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*}
[ring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[module R M] [topological_module R M]
/-- Scalar multiplication by a unit is a homeomorphism from a
topological module onto itself. -/
protected def homeomorph.smul_of_unit (a : units R) : M ≃ₜ M :=
{ to_fun := λ x, (a : R) • x,
inv_fun := λ x, ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • x,
right_inv := λ x, calc (a : R) • ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • x = x :
by rw [smul_smul, units.mul_inv, one_smul],
left_inv := λ x, calc ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • (a : R) • x = x :
by rw [smul_smul, units.inv_mul, one_smul],
continuous_to_fun := continuous_const.smul continuous_id,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_const.smul continuous_id }
lemma is_open_map_smul_of_unit (a : units R) : is_open_map (λ (x : M), (a : R) • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_unit a).is_open_map
lemma is_closed_map_smul_of_unit (a : units R) : is_closed_map (λ (x : M), (a : R) • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_unit a).is_closed_map
/-- If `M` is a topological module over `R` and `0` is a limit of invertible elements of `R`, then
`⊤` is the only submodule of `M` with a nonempty interior.
This is the case, e.g., if `R` is a nondiscrete normed field. -/
lemma submodule.eq_top_of_nonempty_interior' [has_continuous_add M]
[ne_bot (nhds_within (0:R) {x | is_unit x})]
(s : submodule R M) (hs : (interior (s:set M)).nonempty) :
s = ⊤ :=
begin
rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine (submodule.eq_top_iff'.2 $ λ x, _),
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds] at hy,
have : tendsto (λ c:R, y + c • x) (nhds_within 0 {x | is_unit x}) (𝓝 (y + (0:R) • x)),
from tendsto_const_nhds.add ((tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_id).smul
tendsto_const_nhds),
rw [zero_smul, add_zero] at this,
rcases nonempty_of_mem_sets (inter_mem_sets (mem_map.1 (this hy)) self_mem_nhds_within)
with ⟨_, hu, u, rfl⟩,
have hy' : y ∈ ↑s := mem_of_nhds hy,
exact (s.smul_mem_iff' _).1 ((s.add_mem_iff_right hy').1 hu)
end
end
section
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} {a : R}
[field R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[vector_space R M] [topological_vector_space R M]
/-- Scalar multiplication by a non-zero field element is a
homeomorphism from a topological vector space onto itself. -/
protected def homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : M ≃ₜ M :=
{.. homeomorph.smul_of_unit (units.mk0 a ha)}
lemma is_open_map_smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : is_open_map (λ (x : M), a • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero ha).is_open_map
lemma is_closed_map_smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : is_closed_map (λ (x : M), a • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero ha).is_closed_map
end
/-- Continuous linear maps between modules. We only put the type classes that are necessary for the
definition, although in applications `M` and `M₂` will be topological modules over the topological
ring `R`. -/
structure continuous_linear_map
(R : Type*) [semiring R]
(M : Type*) [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
(M₂ : Type*) [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
extends linear_map R M M₂ :=
(cont : continuous to_fun . tactic.interactive.continuity')
notation M ` →L[`:25 R `] ` M₂ := continuous_linear_map R M M₂
/-- Continuous linear equivalences between modules. We only put the type classes that are necessary
for the definition, although in applications `M` and `M₂` will be topological modules over the
topological ring `R`. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure continuous_linear_equiv
(R : Type*) [semiring R]
(M : Type*) [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
(M₂ : Type*) [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
extends linear_equiv R M M₂ :=
(continuous_to_fun : continuous to_fun . tactic.interactive.continuity')
(continuous_inv_fun : continuous inv_fun . tactic.interactive.continuity')
notation M ` ≃L[`:50 R `] ` M₂ := continuous_linear_equiv R M M₂
namespace continuous_linear_map
section semiring
/- Properties that hold for non-necessarily commutative semirings. -/
variables
{R : Type*} [semiring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_monoid M₄]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] [semimodule R M₄]
/-- Coerce continuous linear maps to linear maps. -/
instance : has_coe (M →L[R] M₂) (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨to_linear_map⟩
/-- Coerce continuous linear maps to functions. -/
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance to_fun : has_coe_to_fun $ M →L[R] M₂ := ⟨λ _, M → M₂, λ f, f⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) : (mk f h : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mk' (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) : (mk f h : M → M₂) = f := rfl
@[continuity]
protected lemma continuous (f : M →L[R] M₂) : continuous f := f.2
theorem coe_injective : function.injective (coe : (M →L[R] M₂) → (M →ₗ[R] M₂)) :=
by { intros f g H, cases f, cases g, congr' 1, exact H }
theorem coe_injective' ⦃f g : M →L[R] M₂⦄ (H : (f : M → M₂) = g) : f = g :=
coe_injective $ linear_map.coe_injective H
@[ext] theorem ext {f g : M →L[R] M₂} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_injective' $ funext h
theorem ext_iff {f g : M →L[R] M₂} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨λ h x, by rw h, by ext⟩
variables (c : R) (f g : M →L[R] M₂) (h : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (x y z : M)
-- make some straightforward lemmas available to `simp`.
@[simp] lemma map_zero : f (0 : M) = 0 := (to_linear_map _).map_zero
@[simp] lemma map_add : f (x + y) = f x + f y := (to_linear_map _).map_add _ _
@[simp] lemma map_smul : f (c • x) = c • f x := (to_linear_map _).map_smul _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_coe : ((f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : (M → M₂)) = (f : M → M₂) := rfl
/-- The continuous map that is constantly zero. -/
instance: has_zero (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨⟨0, continuous_const⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply : (0 : M →L[R] M₂) x = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = 0 := rfl
/- no simp attribute on the next line as simp does not always simplify `0 x` to `0`
when `0` is the zero function, while it does for the zero continuous linear map,
and this is the most important property we care about. -/
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_zero' : ((0 : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = 0 := rfl
section
variables (R M)
/-- the identity map as a continuous linear map. -/
def id : M →L[R] M :=
⟨linear_map.id, continuous_id⟩
end
instance : has_one (M →L[R] M) := ⟨id R M⟩
lemma id_apply : id R M x = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_id : (id R M : M →ₗ[R] M) = linear_map.id := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_id' : (id R M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_apply : (1 : M →L[R] M) x = x := rfl
section add
variables [has_continuous_add M₂]
instance : has_add (M →L[R] M₂) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply : (f + g) x = f x + g x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add : (((f + g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) + g := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_add' : (((f + g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = (f : M → M₂) + g := rfl
instance : add_comm_monoid (M →L[R] M₂) :=
by { refine {zero := 0, add := (+), ..}; intros; ext;
apply_rules [zero_add, add_assoc, add_zero, add_left_neg, add_comm] }
lemma sum_apply {ι : Type*} (t : finset ι) (f : ι → M →L[R] M₂) (b : M) :
(∑ d in t, f d) b = ∑ d in t, f d b :=
begin
haveI : is_add_monoid_hom (λ (g : M →L[R] M₂), g b) :=
{ map_add := λ f g, continuous_linear_map.add_apply f g b, map_zero := by simp },
exact (finset.sum_hom t (λ g : M →L[R] M₂, g b)).symm
end
end add
/-- Composition of bounded linear maps. -/
def comp (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) : M →L[R] M₃ :=
⟨linear_map.comp g.to_linear_map f.to_linear_map, g.2.comp f.2⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_comp : ((h.comp f) : (M →ₗ[R] M₃)) = (h : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_comp' : ((h.comp f) : (M → M₃)) = (h : M₂ → M₃) ∘ f := rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_id : f.comp (id R M) = f :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp : (id R M₂).comp f = f :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_zero : f.comp (0 : M₃ →L[R] M) = 0 :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] theorem zero_comp : (0 : M₂ →L[R] M₃).comp f = 0 :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma comp_add [has_continuous_add M₂] [has_continuous_add M₃]
(g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f₁ f₂ : M →L[R] M₂) :
g.comp (f₁ + f₂) = g.comp f₁ + g.comp f₂ :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma add_comp [has_continuous_add M₃]
(g₁ g₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) :
(g₁ + g₂).comp f = g₁.comp f + g₂.comp f :=
by { ext, simp }
theorem comp_assoc (h : M₃ →L[R] M₄) (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) :=
rfl
instance : has_mul (M →L[R] M) := ⟨comp⟩
lemma mul_def (f g : M →L[R] M) : f * g = f.comp g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (f g : M →L[R] M) : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g := rfl
lemma mul_apply (f g : M →L[R] M) (x : M) : (f * g) x = f (g x) := rfl
/-- The cartesian product of two bounded linear maps, as a bounded linear map. -/
protected def prod (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) : M →L[R] (M₂ × M₃) :=
{ cont := f₁.2.prod_mk f₂.2,
..f₁.to_linear_map.prod f₂.to_linear_map }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) :
(f₁.prod f₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃) = linear_map.prod f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma prod_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) (x : M) :
f₁.prod f₂ x = (f₁ x, f₂ x) :=
rfl
/-- Kernel of a continuous linear map. -/
def ker (f : M →L[R] M₂) : submodule R M := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker
@[norm_cast] lemma ker_coe : (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker = f.ker := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_ker {f : M →L[R] M₂} {x} : x ∈ f.ker ↔ f x = 0 := linear_map.mem_ker
lemma is_closed_ker [t1_space M₂] : is_closed (f.ker : set M) :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.1 f.cont _ is_closed_singleton
@[simp] lemma apply_ker (x : f.ker) : f x = 0 := mem_ker.1 x.2
lemma is_complete_ker {M' : Type*} [uniform_space M'] [complete_space M'] [add_comm_monoid M']
[semimodule R M'] [t1_space M₂] (f : M' →L[R] M₂) :
is_complete (f.ker : set M') :=
f.is_closed_ker.is_complete
instance complete_space_ker {M' : Type*} [uniform_space M'] [complete_space M'] [add_comm_monoid M']
[semimodule R M'] [t1_space M₂] (f : M' →L[R] M₂) :
complete_space f.ker :=
f.is_closed_ker.complete_space_coe
@[simp] lemma ker_prod (f : M →L[R] M₂) (g : M →L[R] M₃) :
ker (f.prod g) = ker f ⊓ ker g :=
linear_map.ker_prod f g
/-- Range of a continuous linear map. -/
def range (f : M →L[R] M₂) : submodule R M₂ := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).range
lemma range_coe : (f.range : set M₂) = set.range f := linear_map.range_coe _
lemma mem_range {f : M →L[R] M₂} {y} : y ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ x, f x = y := linear_map.mem_range
lemma range_prod_le (f : M →L[R] M₂) (g : M →L[R] M₃) :
range (f.prod g) ≤ (range f).prod (range g) :=
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).range_prod_le g
/-- Restrict codomain of a continuous linear map. -/
def cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
M →L[R] p :=
{ cont := continuous_subtype_mk h f.continuous,
to_linear_map := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).cod_restrict p h}
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
(f.cod_restrict p h : M →ₗ[R] p) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).cod_restrict p h :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_cod_restrict_apply (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) (x) :
(f.cod_restrict p h x : M₂) = f x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma ker_cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
ker (f.cod_restrict p h) = ker f :=
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker_cod_restrict p h
/-- Embedding of a submodule into the ambient space as a continuous linear map. -/
def subtype_val (p : submodule R M) : p →L[R] M :=
{ cont := continuous_subtype_val,
to_linear_map := p.subtype }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_subtype_val (p : submodule R M) :
(subtype_val p : p →ₗ[R] M) = p.subtype :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma subtype_val_apply (p : submodule R M) (x : p) :
(subtype_val p : p → M) x = x :=
rfl
variables (R M M₂)
/-- `prod.fst` as a `continuous_linear_map`. -/
def fst : M × M₂ →L[R] M :=
{ cont := continuous_fst, to_linear_map := linear_map.fst R M M₂ }
/-- `prod.snd` as a `continuous_linear_map`. -/
def snd : M × M₂ →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := continuous_snd, to_linear_map := linear_map.snd R M M₂ }
variables {R M M₂}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst : (fst R M M₂ : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M) = linear_map.fst R M M₂ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst' : (fst R M M₂ : M × M₂ → M) = prod.fst := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd : (snd R M M₂ : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) = linear_map.snd R M M₂ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd' : (snd R M M₂ : M × M₂ → M₂) = prod.snd := rfl
@[simp] lemma fst_prod_snd : (fst R M M₂).prod (snd R M M₂) = id R (M × M₂) := ext $ λ ⟨x, y⟩, rfl
/-- `prod.map` of two continuous linear maps. -/
def prod_map (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) : (M × M₃) →L[R] (M₂ × M₄) :=
(f₁.comp (fst R M M₃)).prod (f₂.comp (snd R M M₃))
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod_map (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :
(f₁.prod_map f₂ : (M × M₃) →ₗ[R] (M₂ × M₄)) = ((f₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂).prod_map (f₂ : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄)) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod_map' (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :
⇑(f₁.prod_map f₂) = prod.map f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
/-- The continuous linear map given by `(x, y) ↦ f₁ x + f₂ y`. -/
def coprod [has_continuous_add M₃] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) :
(M × M₂) →L[R] M₃ :=
⟨linear_map.coprod f₁ f₂, (f₁.cont.comp continuous_fst).add (f₂.cont.comp continuous_snd)⟩
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_coprod [has_continuous_add M₃]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) :
(f₁.coprod f₂ : (M × M₂) →ₗ[R] M₃) = linear_map.coprod f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coprod_apply [has_continuous_add M₃] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (x) :
f₁.coprod f₂ x = f₁ x.1 + f₂ x.2 := rfl
variables [topological_space R] [topological_semimodule R M₂]
/-- The linear map `λ x, c x • f`. Associates to a scalar-valued linear map and an element of
`M₂` the `M₂`-valued linear map obtained by multiplying the two (a.k.a. tensoring by `M₂`) -/
def smul_right (c : M →L[R] R) (f : M₂) : M →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := c.2.smul continuous_const,
..c.to_linear_map.smul_right f }
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_apply {c : M →L[R] R} {f : M₂} {x : M} :
(smul_right c f : M → M₂) x = (c : M → R) x • f :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_one_one (c : R →L[R] M₂) : smul_right 1 ((c : R → M₂) 1) = c :=
by ext; simp [-continuous_linear_map.map_smul, (continuous_linear_map.map_smul _ _ _).symm]
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_one_eq_iff {f f' : M₂} :
smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f = smul_right 1 f' ↔ f = f' :=
⟨λ h, have (smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f : R → M₂) 1 = (smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f' : R → M₂) 1,
by rw h,
by simp at this; assumption,
by cc⟩
lemma smul_right_comp [topological_semimodule R R] {x : M₂} {c : R} :
(smul_right 1 x : R →L[R] M₂).comp (smul_right 1 c : R →L[R] R) = smul_right 1 (c • x) :=
by { ext, simp [mul_smul] }
end semiring
section pi
variables
{R : Type*} [semiring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [semimodule R M₂]
{ι : Type*} {φ : ι → Type*} [∀i, topological_space (φ i)] [∀i, add_comm_monoid (φ i)] [∀i, semimodule R (φ i)]
/-- `pi` construction for continuous linear functions. From a family of continuous linear functions
it produces a continuous linear function into a family of topological modules. -/
def pi (f : Πi, M →L[R] φ i) : M →L[R] (Πi, φ i) :=
⟨linear_map.pi (λ i, (f i : M →ₗ[R] φ i)),
continuous_pi (λ i, (f i).continuous)⟩
@[simp] lemma pi_apply (f : Πi, M →L[R] φ i) (c : M) (i : ι) :
pi f c i = f i c := rfl
lemma pi_eq_zero (f : Πi, M →L[R] φ i) : pi f = 0 ↔ (∀i, f i = 0) :=
by simp only [ext_iff, pi_apply, function.funext_iff]; exact ⟨λh a b, h b a, λh a b, h b a⟩
lemma pi_zero : pi (λi, 0 : Πi, M →L[R] φ i) = 0 := by ext; refl
lemma pi_comp (f : Πi, M →L[R] φ i) (g : M₂ →L[R] M) : (pi f).comp g = pi (λi, (f i).comp g) := rfl
/-- The projections from a family of topological modules are continuous linear maps. -/
def proj (i : ι) : (Πi, φ i) →L[R] φ i :=
⟨linear_map.proj i, continuous_apply _⟩
@[simp] lemma proj_apply (i : ι) (b : Πi, φ i) : (proj i : (Πi, φ i) →L[R] φ i) b = b i := rfl
lemma proj_pi (f : Πi, M₂ →L[R] φ i) (i : ι) : (proj i).comp (pi f) = f i :=
ext $ assume c, rfl
lemma infi_ker_proj : (⨅i, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i)) = ⊥ :=
linear_map.infi_ker_proj
variables (R φ)
/-- If `I` and `J` are complementary index sets, the product of the kernels of the `J`th projections of
`φ` is linearly equivalent to the product over `I`. -/
def infi_ker_proj_equiv {I J : set ι} [decidable_pred (λi, i ∈ I)]
(hd : disjoint I J) (hu : set.univ ⊆ I ∪ J) :
(⨅i ∈ J, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i)) ≃L[R] (Πi:I, φ i) :=
⟨ linear_map.infi_ker_proj_equiv R φ hd hu,
continuous_pi (λ i, begin
have := @continuous_subtype_coe _ _ (λ x, x ∈ (⨅i ∈ J, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i))),
have := continuous.comp (by exact continuous_apply i) this,
exact this
end),
continuous_subtype_mk _ (continuous_pi (λ i, begin
dsimp, split_ifs; [apply continuous_apply, exact continuous_const]
end)) ⟩
end pi
section ring
variables
{R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_group M₄]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] [semimodule R M₄]
variables (c : R) (f g : M →L[R] M₂) (h : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (x y z : M)
@[simp] lemma map_neg : f (-x) = - (f x) := (to_linear_map _).map_neg _
@[simp] lemma map_sub : f (x - y) = f x - f y := (to_linear_map _).map_sub _ _
@[simp] lemma sub_apply' (x : M) : ((f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
lemma range_prod_eq {f : M →L[R] M₂} {g : M →L[R] M₃} (h : ker f ⊔ ker g = ⊤) :
range (f.prod g) = (range f).prod (range g) :=
linear_map.range_prod_eq h
section
variables [topological_add_group M₂]
instance : has_neg (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨λ f, ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_apply : (-f) x = - (f x) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg : (((-f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = -(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_neg' : (((-f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = -(f : M → M₂) := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (M →L[R] M₂) :=
by { refine {zero := 0, add := (+), neg := has_neg.neg, ..}; intros; ext;
apply_rules [zero_add, add_assoc, add_zero, add_left_neg, add_comm] }
lemma sub_apply (x : M) : (f - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub : (((f - g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) - g := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub' : (((f - g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = (f : M → M₂) - g := rfl
end
instance [topological_add_group M] : ring (M →L[R] M) :=
{ mul := (*),
one := 1,
mul_one := λ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
one_mul := λ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
mul_assoc := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
left_distrib := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, map_add _ _ _,
right_distrib := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, linear_map.add_apply _ _ _,
..continuous_linear_map.add_comm_group }
lemma smul_right_one_pow [topological_space R]
[topological_add_group R] [topological_semimodule R R] (c : R) (n : ℕ) :
(smul_right 1 c : R →L[R] R)^n = smul_right 1 (c^n) :=
begin
induction n with n ihn,
{ ext, simp },
{ rw [pow_succ, ihn, mul_def, smul_right_comp, smul_eq_mul, pow_succ'] }
end
/-- Given a right inverse `f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M` to `f₁ : M →L[R] M₂`,
`proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h` is the projection `M →L[R] f₁.ker` along `f₂.range`. -/
def proj_ker_of_right_inverse [topological_add_group M] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M →L[R] f₁.ker :=
(id R M - f₂.comp f₁).cod_restrict f₁.ker $ λ x, by simp [h (f₁ x)]
@[simp] lemma coe_proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
(f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h x : M) = x - f₂ (f₁ x) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply_idem [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : f₁.ker) :
f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h x = x :=
subtype.ext_iff_val.2 $ by simp
@[simp] lemma proj_ker_of_right_inverse_comp_inv [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (y : M₂) :
f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h (f₂ y) = 0 :=
subtype.ext_iff_val.2 $ by simp [h y]
end ring
section comm_ring
variables
{R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [topological_space R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
[module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃] [topological_module R M₃]
instance : has_scalar R (M →L[R] M₃) :=
⟨λ c f, ⟨c • f, continuous_const.smul f.2⟩⟩
variables (c : R) (h : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f g : M →L[R] M₂) (x y z : M)
@[simp] lemma smul_comp : (c • h).comp f = c • (h.comp f) := rfl
variable [topological_module R M₂]
@[simp] lemma smul_apply : (c • f) x = c • (f x) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_apply : (((c • f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = c • (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_apply' : (((c • f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = c • (f : M → M₂) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_smul : h.comp (c • f) = c • (h.comp f) := by { ext, simp }
variable [topological_add_group M₂]
instance : module R (M →L[R] M₂) :=
{ smul_zero := λ _, ext $ λ _, smul_zero _,
zero_smul := λ _, ext $ λ _, zero_smul _ _,
one_smul := λ _, ext $ λ _, one_smul _ _,
mul_smul := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, mul_smul _ _ _,
add_smul := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, add_smul _ _ _,
smul_add := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, smul_add _ _ _ }
instance : algebra R (M₂ →L[R] M₂) :=
algebra.of_semimodule' (λ c f, ext $ λ x, rfl) (λ c f, ext $ λ x, f.map_smul c x)
end comm_ring
end continuous_linear_map
namespace continuous_linear_equiv
section add_comm_monoid
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_monoid M₄]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] [semimodule R M₄]
/-- A continuous linear equivalence induces a continuous linear map. -/
def to_continuous_linear_map (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := e.continuous_to_fun,
..e.to_linear_equiv.to_linear_map }
/-- Coerce continuous linear equivs to continuous linear maps. -/
instance : has_coe (M ≃L[R] M₂) (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨to_continuous_linear_map⟩
/-- Coerce continuous linear equivs to maps. -/
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (M ≃L[R] M₂) := ⟨λ _, M → M₂, λ f, f⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_def_rev (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e.to_continuous_linear_map = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (b : M) : (e : M →L[R] M₂) b = e b := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_coe (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : ((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = e := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : M ≃L[R] M₂} (h : (f : M → M₂) = g) : f = g :=
begin
cases f; cases g,
simp only,
ext x,
induction h,
refl
end
/-- A continuous linear equivalence induces a homeomorphism. -/
def to_homeomorph (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M ≃ₜ M₂ := { ..e }
-- Make some straightforward lemmas available to `simp`.
@[simp] lemma map_zero (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e (0 : M) = 0 := (e : M →L[R] M₂).map_zero
@[simp] lemma map_add (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x y : M) : e (x + y) = e x + e y :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_add x y
@[simp] lemma map_smul (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (c : R) (x : M) : e (c • x) = c • (e x) :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_smul c x
@[simp] lemma map_eq_zero_iff (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x : M} : e x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
e.to_linear_equiv.map_eq_zero_iff
attribute [continuity]
continuous_linear_equiv.continuous_to_fun continuous_linear_equiv.continuous_inv_fun
@[continuity]
protected lemma continuous (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : continuous (e : M → M₂) :=
e.continuous_to_fun
protected lemma continuous_on (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {s : set M} : continuous_on (e : M → M₂) s :=
e.continuous.continuous_on
protected lemma continuous_at (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x : M} : continuous_at (e : M → M₂) x :=
e.continuous.continuous_at
protected lemma continuous_within_at (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {s : set M} {x : M} :
continuous_within_at (e : M → M₂) s x :=
e.continuous.continuous_within_at
lemma comp_continuous_on_iff
{α : Type*} [topological_space α] (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (f : α → M) (s : set α) :
continuous_on (e ∘ f) s ↔ continuous_on f s :=
e.to_homeomorph.comp_continuous_on_iff _ _
lemma comp_continuous_iff
{α : Type*} [topological_space α] (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (f : α → M) :
continuous (e ∘ f) ↔ continuous f :=
e.to_homeomorph.comp_continuous_iff _
/-- An extensionality lemma for `R ≃L[R] M`. -/
lemma ext₁ [topological_space R] {f g : R ≃L[R] M} (h : f 1 = g 1) : f = g :=
ext $ funext $ λ x, mul_one x ▸ by rw [← smul_eq_mul, map_smul, h, map_smul]
section
variables (R M)
/-- The identity map as a continuous linear equivalence. -/
@[refl] protected def refl : M ≃L[R] M :=
{ continuous_to_fun := continuous_id,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_id,
.. linear_equiv.refl R M }
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_refl :
(continuous_linear_equiv.refl R M : M →L[R] M) = continuous_linear_map.id R M := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_refl' :
(continuous_linear_equiv.refl R M : M → M) = id := rfl
/-- The inverse of a continuous linear equivalence as a continuous linear equivalence-/
@[symm] protected def symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M₂ ≃L[R] M :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e.continuous_inv_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e.continuous_to_fun,
.. e.to_linear_equiv.symm }
@[simp] lemma symm_to_linear_equiv (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
e.symm.to_linear_equiv = e.to_linear_equiv.symm :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- The composition of two continuous linear equivalences as a continuous linear equivalence. -/
@[trans] protected def trans (e₁ : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃L[R] M₃) : M ≃L[R] M₃ :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e₂.continuous_to_fun.comp e₁.continuous_to_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e₁.continuous_inv_fun.comp e₂.continuous_inv_fun,
.. e₁.to_linear_equiv.trans e₂.to_linear_equiv }
@[simp] lemma trans_to_linear_equiv (e₁ : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃L[R] M₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).to_linear_equiv = e₁.to_linear_equiv.trans e₂.to_linear_equiv :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- Product of two continuous linear equivalences. The map comes from `equiv.prod_congr`. -/
def prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) : (M × M₃) ≃L[R] (M₂ × M₄) :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e.continuous_to_fun.prod_map e'.continuous_to_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e.continuous_inv_fun.prod_map e'.continuous_inv_fun,
.. e.to_linear_equiv.prod e'.to_linear_equiv }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma prod_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (x) :
e.prod e' x = (e x.1, e' x.2) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) :
(e.prod e' : (M × M₃) →L[R] (M₂ × M₄)) = (e : M →L[R] M₂).prod_map (e' : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :=
rfl
theorem bijective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.bijective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.bijective
theorem injective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.injective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.injective
theorem surjective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.surjective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.surjective
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (c : M₂) : e (e.symm c) = c := e.1.6 c
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (b : M) : e.symm (e b) = b := e.1.5 b
@[simp] theorem coe_comp_coe_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e : M →L[R] M₂).comp (e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) = continuous_linear_map.id R M₂ :=
continuous_linear_map.ext e.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] theorem coe_symm_comp_coe (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M).comp (e : M →L[R] M₂) = continuous_linear_map.id R M :=
continuous_linear_map.ext e.symm_apply_apply
lemma symm_comp_self (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e.symm : M₂ → M) ∘ (e : M → M₂) = id :=
by{ ext x, exact symm_apply_apply e x }
lemma self_comp_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e : M → M₂) ∘ (e.symm : M₂ → M) = id :=
by{ ext x, exact apply_symm_apply e x }
@[simp] lemma symm_comp_self' (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
((e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) : M₂ → M) ∘ ((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = id :=
symm_comp_self e
@[simp] lemma self_comp_symm' (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) ∘ ((e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) : M₂ → M) = id :=
self_comp_symm e
@[simp] theorem symm_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e.symm.symm = e :=
by { ext x, refl }
theorem symm_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x : M) : e.symm.symm x = e x :=
rfl
lemma symm_apply_eq (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y :=
e.to_linear_equiv.symm_apply_eq
lemma eq_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x :=
e.to_linear_equiv.eq_symm_apply
/-- Create a `continuous_linear_equiv` from two `continuous_linear_map`s that are
inverse of each other. -/
def equiv_of_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h₁ : function.left_inverse f₂ f₁)
(h₂ : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M ≃L[R] M₂ :=
{ to_fun := f₁,
continuous_to_fun := f₁.continuous,
inv_fun := f₂,
continuous_inv_fun := f₂.continuous,
left_inv := h₁,
right_inv := h₂,
.. f₁ }
@[simp] lemma equiv_of_inverse_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ h₁ h₂ x) :
equiv_of_inverse f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ x = f₁ x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_equiv_of_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ h₁ h₂) :
(equiv_of_inverse f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂).symm = equiv_of_inverse f₂ f₁ h₂ h₁ :=
rfl
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_group M₄]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] [semimodule R M₄]
variables [topological_add_group M₄]
/-- Equivalence given by a block lower diagonal matrix. `e` and `e'` are diagonal square blocks,
and `f` is a rectangular block below the diagonal. -/
def skew_prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) :
(M × M₃) ≃L[R] M₂ × M₄ :=
{ continuous_to_fun := (e.continuous_to_fun.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk
((e'.continuous_to_fun.comp continuous_snd).add $ f.continuous.comp continuous_fst),
continuous_inv_fun := (e.continuous_inv_fun.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk
(e'.continuous_inv_fun.comp $ continuous_snd.sub $ f.continuous.comp $
e.continuous_inv_fun.comp continuous_fst),
.. e.to_linear_equiv.skew_prod e'.to_linear_equiv ↑f }
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) (x) :
e.skew_prod e' f x = (e x.1, e' x.2 + f x.1) := rfl
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) (x) :
(e.skew_prod e' f).symm x = (e.symm x.1, e'.symm (x.2 - f (e.symm x.1))) := rfl
end add_comm_group
section ring
variables {R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M] [semimodule R M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂] [semimodule R M₂]
@[simp] lemma map_sub (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x y : M) : e (x - y) = e x - e y :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_sub x y
@[simp] lemma map_neg (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x : M) : e (-x) = -e x := (e : M →L[R] M₂).map_neg x
section
variables (R) [topological_space R] [topological_module R R]
/-- Continuous linear equivalences `R ≃L[R] R` are enumerated by `units R`. -/
def units_equiv_aut : units R ≃ (R ≃L[R] R) :=
{ to_fun := λ u, equiv_of_inverse
(continuous_linear_map.smul_right 1 ↑u)
(continuous_linear_map.smul_right 1 ↑u⁻¹)
(λ x, by simp) (λ x, by simp),
inv_fun := λ e, ⟨e 1, e.symm 1,
by rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, symm_apply_apply],
by rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, apply_symm_apply]⟩,
left_inv := λ u, units.ext $ by simp,
right_inv := λ e, ext₁ $ by simp }
variable {R}
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_apply (u : units R) (x : R) : units_equiv_aut R u x = x * u := rfl
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_apply_symm (u : units R) (x : R) :
(units_equiv_aut R u).symm x = x * ↑u⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_symm_apply (e : R ≃L[R] R) :
↑((units_equiv_aut R).symm e) = e 1 :=
rfl
end
variables [topological_add_group M]
open continuous_linear_map (id fst snd subtype_val mem_ker)
/-- A pair of continuous linear maps such that `f₁ ∘ f₂ = id` generates a continuous
linear equivalence `e` between `M` and `M₂ × f₁.ker` such that `(e x).2 = x` for `x ∈ f₁.ker`,
`(e x).1 = f₁ x`, and `(e (f₂ y)).2 = 0`. The map is given by `e x = (f₁ x, x - f₂ (f₁ x))`. -/
def equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M ≃L[R] M₂ × f₁.ker :=
equiv_of_inverse (f₁.prod (f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h)) (f₂.coprod (subtype_val f₁.ker))
(λ x, by simp)
(λ ⟨x, y⟩, by simp [h x])
@[simp] lemma fst_equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
(equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h x).1 = f₁ x := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
((equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h x).2 : M) = x - f₂ (f₁ x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_of_right_inverse_symm_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (y : M₂ × f₁.ker) :
(equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h).symm y = f₂ y.1 + y.2 := rfl
end ring
end continuous_linear_equiv
namespace submodule
variables
{R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂]
open continuous_linear_map
/-- A submodule `p` is called *complemented* if there exists a continuous projection `M →ₗ[R] p`. -/
def closed_complemented (p : submodule R M) : Prop := ∃ f : M →L[R] p, ∀ x : p, f x = x
lemma closed_complemented.has_closed_complement {p : submodule R M} [t1_space p]
(h : closed_complemented p) :
∃ (q : submodule R M) (hq : is_closed (q : set M)), is_compl p q :=
exists.elim h $ λ f hf, ⟨f.ker, f.is_closed_ker, linear_map.is_compl_of_proj hf⟩
protected lemma closed_complemented.is_closed [topological_add_group M] [t1_space M]
{p : submodule R M} (h : closed_complemented p) :
is_closed (p : set M) :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨f, hf⟩,
have : ker (id R M - (subtype_val p).comp f) = p := linear_map.ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj hf,
exact this ▸ (is_closed_ker _)
end
@[simp] lemma closed_complemented_bot : closed_complemented (⊥ : submodule R M) :=
⟨0, λ x, by simp only [zero_apply, eq_zero_of_bot_submodule x]⟩
@[simp] lemma closed_complemented_top : closed_complemented (⊤ : submodule R M) :=
⟨(id R M).cod_restrict ⊤ (λ x, trivial), λ x, subtype.ext_iff_val.2 $ by simp⟩
end submodule
lemma continuous_linear_map.closed_complemented_ker_of_right_inverse {R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M] [module R M₂]
[topological_add_group M] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
f₁.ker.closed_complemented :=
⟨f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h, f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply_idem f₂ h⟩
|
3b566f9e37491cfdf2f86060c86e59190e84b084 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/algebra/star/basic.lean | 0b2482caa873297ed7e548cc3a85c90a9fcc31ce | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,301 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import tactic.apply_fun
import algebra.field.opposite
import algebra.field_power
import algebra.ring.aut
import group_theory.group_action.units
import group_theory.group_action.opposite
import algebra.ring.comp_typeclasses
/-!
# Star monoids, rings, and modules
We introduce the basic algebraic notions of star monoids, star rings, and star modules.
A star algebra is simply a star ring that is also a star module.
These are implemented as "mixin" typeclasses, so to summon a star ring (for example)
one needs to write `(R : Type) [ring R] [star_ring R]`.
This avoids difficulties with diamond inheritance.
We also define the class `star_ordered_ring R`, which says that the order on `R` respects the
star operation, i.e. an element `r` is nonnegative iff there exists an `s` such that
`r = star s * s`.
For now we simply do not introduce notations,
as different users are expected to feel strongly about the relative merits of
`r^*`, `r†`, `rᘁ`, and so on.
Our star rings are actually star semirings, but of course we can prove
`star_neg : star (-r) = - star r` when the underlying semiring is a ring.
## TODO
* In a Banach star algebra without a well-defined square root, the natural ordering is given by the
positive cone which is the closure of the sums of elements `star r * r`. A weaker version of
`star_ordered_ring` could be defined for this case. Note that the current definition has the
advantage of not requiring a topology.
-/
universes u v
open mul_opposite
/--
Notation typeclass (with no default notation!) for an algebraic structure with a star operation.
-/
class has_star (R : Type u) :=
(star : R → R)
variables {R : Type u}
export has_star (star)
/--
A star operation (e.g. complex conjugate).
-/
add_decl_doc star
/--
Typeclass for a star operation with is involutive.
-/
class has_involutive_star (R : Type u) extends has_star R :=
(star_involutive : function.involutive star)
export has_involutive_star (star_involutive)
@[simp] lemma star_star [has_involutive_star R] (r : R) : star (star r) = r :=
star_involutive _
lemma star_injective [has_involutive_star R] : function.injective (star : R → R) :=
star_involutive.injective
/-- `star` as an equivalence when it is involutive. -/
protected def equiv.star [has_involutive_star R] : equiv.perm R :=
star_involutive.to_perm _
lemma eq_star_of_eq_star [has_involutive_star R] {r s : R} (h : r = star s) : s = star r :=
by simp [h]
lemma eq_star_iff_eq_star [has_involutive_star R] {r s : R} : r = star s ↔ s = star r :=
⟨eq_star_of_eq_star, eq_star_of_eq_star⟩
lemma star_eq_iff_star_eq [has_involutive_star R] {r s : R} : star r = s ↔ star s = r :=
eq_comm.trans $ eq_star_iff_eq_star.trans eq_comm
/--
Typeclass for a trivial star operation. This is mostly meant for `ℝ`.
-/
class has_trivial_star (R : Type u) [has_star R] : Prop :=
(star_trivial : ∀ (r : R), star r = r)
export has_trivial_star (star_trivial)
attribute [simp] star_trivial
/--
A `*`-semigroup is a semigroup `R` with an involutive operations `star`
so `star (r * s) = star s * star r`.
-/
class star_semigroup (R : Type u) [semigroup R] extends has_involutive_star R :=
(star_mul : ∀ r s : R, star (r * s) = star s * star r)
export star_semigroup (star_mul)
attribute [simp] star_mul
/-- In a commutative ring, make `simp` prefer leaving the order unchanged. -/
@[simp] lemma star_mul' [comm_semigroup R] [star_semigroup R] (x y : R) :
star (x * y) = star x * star y :=
(star_mul x y).trans (mul_comm _ _)
/-- `star` as an `mul_equiv` from `R` to `Rᵐᵒᵖ` -/
@[simps apply]
def star_mul_equiv [semigroup R] [star_semigroup R] : R ≃* Rᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ to_fun := λ x, mul_opposite.op (star x),
map_mul' := λ x y, (star_mul x y).symm ▸ (mul_opposite.op_mul _ _),
..(has_involutive_star.star_involutive.to_perm star).trans op_equiv}
/-- `star` as a `mul_aut` for commutative `R`. -/
@[simps apply]
def star_mul_aut [comm_semigroup R] [star_semigroup R] : mul_aut R :=
{ to_fun := star,
map_mul' := star_mul',
..(has_involutive_star.star_involutive.to_perm star) }
variables (R)
@[simp] lemma star_one [monoid R] [star_semigroup R] : star (1 : R) = 1 :=
op_injective $ (star_mul_equiv : R ≃* Rᵐᵒᵖ).map_one.trans (op_one _).symm
variables {R}
@[simp] lemma star_pow [monoid R] [star_semigroup R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) : star (x ^ n) = star x ^ n :=
op_injective $
((star_mul_equiv : R ≃* Rᵐᵒᵖ).to_monoid_hom.map_pow x n).trans (op_pow (star x) n).symm
@[simp] lemma star_inv [group R] [star_semigroup R] (x : R) : star (x⁻¹) = (star x)⁻¹ :=
op_injective $
((star_mul_equiv : R ≃* Rᵐᵒᵖ).to_monoid_hom.map_inv x).trans (op_inv (star x)).symm
@[simp] lemma star_zpow [group R] [star_semigroup R] (x : R) (z : ℤ) : star (x ^ z) = star x ^ z :=
op_injective $
((star_mul_equiv : R ≃* Rᵐᵒᵖ).to_monoid_hom.map_zpow x z).trans (op_zpow (star x) z).symm
/-- When multiplication is commutative, `star` preserves division. -/
@[simp] lemma star_div [comm_group R] [star_semigroup R] (x y : R) :
star (x / y) = star x / star y :=
(star_mul_aut : R ≃* R).to_monoid_hom.map_div _ _
section
open_locale big_operators
@[simp] lemma star_prod [comm_monoid R] [star_semigroup R] {α : Type*}
(s : finset α) (f : α → R):
star (∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ x in s, star (f x) :=
(star_mul_aut : R ≃* R).map_prod _ _
end
/--
Any commutative monoid admits the trivial `*`-structure.
See note [reducible non-instances].
-/
@[reducible]
def star_semigroup_of_comm {R : Type*} [comm_monoid R] : star_semigroup R :=
{ star := id,
star_involutive := λ x, rfl,
star_mul := mul_comm }
section
local attribute [instance] star_semigroup_of_comm
/-- Note that since `star_semigroup_of_comm` is reducible, `simp` can already prove this. --/
lemma star_id_of_comm {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] {x : R} : star x = x := rfl
end
/--
A `*`-additive monoid `R` is an additive monoid with an involutive `star` operation which
preserves addition.
-/
class star_add_monoid (R : Type u) [add_monoid R] extends has_involutive_star R :=
(star_add : ∀ r s : R, star (r + s) = star r + star s)
export star_add_monoid (star_add)
attribute [simp] star_add
/-- `star` as an `add_equiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def star_add_equiv [add_monoid R] [star_add_monoid R] : R ≃+ R :=
{ to_fun := star,
map_add' := star_add,
..(has_involutive_star.star_involutive.to_perm star)}
variables (R)
@[simp] lemma star_zero [add_monoid R] [star_add_monoid R] : star (0 : R) = 0 :=
(star_add_equiv : R ≃+ R).map_zero
variables {R}
@[simp]
lemma star_eq_zero [add_monoid R] [star_add_monoid R] {x : R} : star x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
star_add_equiv.map_eq_zero_iff
lemma star_ne_zero [add_monoid R] [star_add_monoid R] {x : R} : star x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
star_eq_zero.not
@[simp] lemma star_neg [add_group R] [star_add_monoid R] (r : R) : star (-r) = - star r :=
(star_add_equiv : R ≃+ R).map_neg _
@[simp] lemma star_sub [add_group R] [star_add_monoid R] (r s : R) :
star (r - s) = star r - star s :=
(star_add_equiv : R ≃+ R).map_sub _ _
@[simp] lemma star_nsmul [add_monoid R] [star_add_monoid R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
star (n • x) = n • star x :=
(star_add_equiv : R ≃+ R).to_add_monoid_hom.map_nsmul _ _
@[simp] lemma star_zsmul [add_group R] [star_add_monoid R] (x : R) (n : ℤ) :
star (n • x) = n • star x :=
(star_add_equiv : R ≃+ R).to_add_monoid_hom.map_zsmul _ _
section
open_locale big_operators
@[simp] lemma star_sum [add_comm_monoid R] [star_add_monoid R] {α : Type*}
(s : finset α) (f : α → R):
star (∑ x in s, f x) = ∑ x in s, star (f x) :=
(star_add_equiv : R ≃+ R).map_sum _ _
end
/--
A `*`-ring `R` is a (semi)ring with an involutive `star` operation which is additive
which makes `R` with its multiplicative structure into a `*`-semigroup
(i.e. `star (r * s) = star s * star r`).
-/
class star_ring (R : Type u) [non_unital_semiring R] extends star_semigroup R :=
(star_add : ∀ r s : R, star (r + s) = star r + star s)
@[priority 100]
instance star_ring.to_star_add_monoid [non_unital_semiring R] [star_ring R] : star_add_monoid R :=
{ star_add := star_ring.star_add }
/-- `star` as an `ring_equiv` from `R` to `Rᵐᵒᵖ` -/
@[simps apply]
def star_ring_equiv [non_unital_semiring R] [star_ring R] : R ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ to_fun := λ x, mul_opposite.op (star x),
..star_add_equiv.trans (mul_opposite.op_add_equiv : R ≃+ Rᵐᵒᵖ),
..star_mul_equiv }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma star_nat_cast [semiring R] [star_ring R] (n : ℕ) :
star (n : R) = n :=
(congr_arg unop (map_nat_cast (star_ring_equiv : R ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ) n)).trans (unop_nat_cast _)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma star_int_cast [ring R] [star_ring R] (z : ℤ) :
star (z : R) = z :=
(congr_arg unop ((star_ring_equiv : R ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ).to_ring_hom.map_int_cast z)).trans (unop_int_cast _)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma star_rat_cast [division_ring R] [char_zero R] [star_ring R] (r : ℚ) :
star (r : R) = r :=
(congr_arg unop $ map_rat_cast (star_ring_equiv : R ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ) r).trans (unop_rat_cast _)
/-- `star` as a ring automorphism, for commutative `R`. -/
@[simps apply]
def star_ring_aut [comm_semiring R] [star_ring R] : ring_aut R :=
{ to_fun := star,
..star_add_equiv,
..star_mul_aut }
variables (R)
/-- `star` as a ring endomorphism, for commutative `R`. This is used to denote complex
conjugation, and is available under the notation `conj` in the locale `complex_conjugate`.
Note that this is the preferred form (over `star_ring_aut`, available under the same hypotheses)
because the notation `E →ₗ⋆[R] F` for an `R`-conjugate-linear map (short for
`E →ₛₗ[star_ring_end R] F`) does not pretty-print if there is a coercion involved, as would be the
case for `(↑star_ring_aut : R →* R)`. -/
def star_ring_end [comm_semiring R] [star_ring R] : R →+* R := @star_ring_aut R _ _
variables {R}
localized "notation `conj` := star_ring_end _" in complex_conjugate
/-- This is not a simp lemma, since we usually want simp to keep `star_ring_end` bundled.
For example, for complex conjugation, we don't want simp to turn `conj x`
into the bare function `star x` automatically since most lemmas are about `conj x`. -/
lemma star_ring_end_apply [comm_semiring R] [star_ring R] {x : R} :
star_ring_end R x = star x := rfl
@[simp] lemma star_ring_end_self_apply [comm_semiring R] [star_ring R] (x : R) :
star_ring_end R (star_ring_end R x) = x := star_star x
-- A more convenient name for complex conjugation
alias star_ring_end_self_apply ← complex.conj_conj
alias star_ring_end_self_apply ← is_R_or_C.conj_conj
@[simp] lemma star_inv' [division_ring R] [star_ring R] (x : R) : star (x⁻¹) = (star x)⁻¹ :=
op_injective $
((star_ring_equiv : R ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ).to_ring_hom.map_inv x).trans (op_inv (star x)).symm
@[simp] lemma star_zpow₀ [division_ring R] [star_ring R] (x : R) (z : ℤ) :
star (x ^ z) = star x ^ z :=
op_injective $
((star_ring_equiv : R ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ).to_ring_hom.map_zpow x z).trans (op_zpow (star x) z).symm
/-- When multiplication is commutative, `star` preserves division. -/
@[simp] lemma star_div' [field R] [star_ring R] (x y : R) : star (x / y) = star x / star y :=
(star_ring_end R).map_div _ _
@[simp] lemma star_bit0 [add_monoid R] [star_add_monoid R] (r : R) :
star (bit0 r) = bit0 (star r) :=
by simp [bit0]
@[simp] lemma star_bit1 [semiring R] [star_ring R] (r : R) : star (bit1 r) = bit1 (star r) :=
by simp [bit1]
/--
Any commutative semiring admits the trivial `*`-structure.
See note [reducible non-instances].
-/
@[reducible]
def star_ring_of_comm {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] : star_ring R :=
{ star := id,
star_add := λ x y, rfl,
..star_semigroup_of_comm }
/--
An ordered `*`-ring is a ring which is both an `ordered_add_comm_group` and a `*`-ring,
and `0 ≤ r ↔ ∃ s, r = star s * s`.
-/
class star_ordered_ring (R : Type u) [non_unital_semiring R] [partial_order R]
extends star_ring R :=
(add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : R, a ≤ b → ∀ c : R, c + a ≤ c + b)
(nonneg_iff : ∀ r : R, 0 ≤ r ↔ ∃ s, r = star s * s)
namespace star_ordered_ring
variables [ring R] [partial_order R] [star_ordered_ring R]
@[priority 100] -- see note [lower instance priority]
instance : ordered_add_comm_group R :=
{ ..show ring R, by apply_instance,
..show partial_order R, by apply_instance,
..show star_ordered_ring R, by apply_instance }
end star_ordered_ring
lemma star_mul_self_nonneg
[non_unital_semiring R] [partial_order R] [star_ordered_ring R] {r : R} : 0 ≤ star r * r :=
(star_ordered_ring.nonneg_iff _).mpr ⟨r, rfl⟩
lemma star_mul_self_nonneg'
[non_unital_semiring R] [partial_order R] [star_ordered_ring R] {r : R} : 0 ≤ r * star r :=
by { nth_rewrite_rhs 0 [←star_star r], exact star_mul_self_nonneg }
/--
A star module `A` over a star ring `R` is a module which is a star add monoid,
and the two star structures are compatible in the sense
`star (r • a) = star r • star a`.
Note that it is up to the user of this typeclass to enforce
`[semiring R] [star_ring R] [add_comm_monoid A] [star_add_monoid A] [module R A]`, and that
the statement only requires `[has_star R] [has_star A] [has_scalar R A]`.
If used as `[comm_ring R] [star_ring R] [semiring A] [star_ring A] [algebra R A]`, this represents a
star algebra.
-/
class star_module (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [has_star R] [has_star A] [has_scalar R A] : Prop :=
(star_smul : ∀ (r : R) (a : A), star (r • a) = star r • star a)
export star_module (star_smul)
attribute [simp] star_smul
/-- A commutative star monoid is a star module over itself via `monoid.to_mul_action`. -/
instance star_semigroup.to_star_module [comm_monoid R] [star_semigroup R] : star_module R R :=
⟨star_mul'⟩
namespace ring_hom_inv_pair
/-- Instance needed to define star-linear maps over a commutative star ring
(ex: conjugate-linear maps when R = ℂ). -/
instance [comm_semiring R] [star_ring R] :
ring_hom_inv_pair (star_ring_end R) (star_ring_end R) :=
⟨ring_hom.ext star_star, ring_hom.ext star_star⟩
end ring_hom_inv_pair
/-! ### Instances -/
namespace units
variables [monoid R] [star_semigroup R]
instance : star_semigroup Rˣ :=
{ star := λ u,
{ val := star u,
inv := star ↑u⁻¹,
val_inv := (star_mul _ _).symm.trans $ (congr_arg star u.inv_val).trans $ star_one _,
inv_val := (star_mul _ _).symm.trans $ (congr_arg star u.val_inv).trans $ star_one _ },
star_involutive := λ u, units.ext (star_involutive _),
star_mul := λ u v, units.ext (star_mul _ _) }
@[simp] lemma coe_star (u : Rˣ) : ↑(star u) = (star ↑u : R) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_star_inv (u : Rˣ) : ↑(star u)⁻¹ = (star ↑u⁻¹ : R) := rfl
instance {A : Type*} [has_star A] [has_scalar R A] [star_module R A] : star_module Rˣ A :=
⟨λ u a, (star_smul ↑u a : _)⟩
end units
lemma is_unit.star [monoid R] [star_semigroup R] {a : R} : is_unit a → is_unit (star a)
| ⟨u, hu⟩ := ⟨star u, hu ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma is_unit_star [monoid R] [star_semigroup R] {a : R} : is_unit (star a) ↔ is_unit a :=
⟨λ h, star_star a ▸ h.star, is_unit.star⟩
lemma ring.inverse_star [semiring R] [star_ring R] (a : R) :
ring.inverse (star a) = star (ring.inverse a) :=
begin
by_cases ha : is_unit a,
{ obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := ha,
rw [ring.inverse_unit, ←units.coe_star, ring.inverse_unit, ←units.coe_star_inv], },
rw [ring.inverse_non_unit _ ha, ring.inverse_non_unit _ (mt is_unit_star.mp ha), star_zero],
end
instance invertible.star {R : Type*} [monoid R] [star_semigroup R] (r : R) [invertible r] :
invertible (star r) :=
{ inv_of := star (⅟r),
inv_of_mul_self := by rw [←star_mul, mul_inv_of_self, star_one],
mul_inv_of_self := by rw [←star_mul, inv_of_mul_self, star_one] }
lemma star_inv_of {R : Type*} [monoid R] [star_semigroup R] (r : R)
[invertible r] [invertible (star r)] :
star (⅟r) = ⅟(star r) :=
by { letI := invertible.star r, convert (rfl : star (⅟r) = _) }
namespace mul_opposite
/-- The opposite type carries the same star operation. -/
instance [has_star R] : has_star (Rᵐᵒᵖ) :=
{ star := λ r, op (star (r.unop)) }
@[simp] lemma unop_star [has_star R] (r : Rᵐᵒᵖ) : unop (star r) = star (unop r) := rfl
@[simp] lemma op_star [has_star R] (r : R) : op (star r) = star (op r) := rfl
instance [has_involutive_star R] : has_involutive_star (Rᵐᵒᵖ) :=
{ star_involutive := λ r, unop_injective (star_star r.unop) }
instance [monoid R] [star_semigroup R] : star_semigroup (Rᵐᵒᵖ) :=
{ star_mul := λ x y, unop_injective (star_mul y.unop x.unop) }
instance [add_monoid R] [star_add_monoid R] : star_add_monoid (Rᵐᵒᵖ) :=
{ star_add := λ x y, unop_injective (star_add x.unop y.unop) }
instance [semiring R] [star_ring R] : star_ring (Rᵐᵒᵖ) :=
{ .. mul_opposite.star_add_monoid }
end mul_opposite
/-- A commutative star monoid is a star module over its opposite via
`monoid.to_opposite_mul_action`. -/
instance star_semigroup.to_opposite_star_module [comm_monoid R] [star_semigroup R] :
star_module Rᵐᵒᵖ R :=
⟨λ r s, star_mul' s r.unop⟩
|
73d17b53b0a3ad54cd6c4efdcc2965ebc495ee75 | 957a80ea22c5abb4f4670b250d55534d9db99108 | /library/init/data/ordering.lean | 4f5aa1f8d8792650b65346efc678ad8229676d71 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean | aa1e64d604051e602fcf4610061314b9a37ab8cd | f1ec117a24459b59c6ff9e56a1d09d9e9e60a6c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,202,909,807 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 75,319,626 | 2 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,539,290,164,000 | 1,480,616,104,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,775 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.data.repr init.data.prod init.data.sum.basic
universes u v
inductive ordering
| lt | eq | gt
namespace ordering
def swap : ordering → ordering
| lt := gt
| eq := eq
| gt := lt
def or_else : ordering → thunk ordering → ordering
| lt _ := lt
| eq f := f ()
| gt _ := gt
theorem swap_swap : ∀ (o : ordering), o.swap.swap = o
| lt := rfl
| eq := rfl
| gt := rfl
end ordering
open ordering
instance : has_repr ordering :=
⟨(λ s, match s with | ordering.lt := "lt" | ordering.eq := "eq" | ordering.gt := "gt" end)⟩
class has_ordering (α : Type u) :=
(cmp : α → α → ordering)
def nat.cmp (a b : nat) : ordering :=
if a < b then ordering.lt
else if a = b then ordering.eq
else ordering.gt
instance : has_ordering nat :=
⟨nat.cmp⟩
instance (n) : has_ordering (fin n) :=
⟨λ a b, nat.cmp a.1 b.1⟩
instance : has_ordering char :=
fin.has_ordering _
instance : has_ordering unsigned :=
fin.has_ordering _
def list.cmp {α : Type u} [has_ordering α] : list α → list α → ordering
| [] [] := ordering.eq
| [] (b::l') := ordering.lt
| (a::l) [] := ordering.gt
| (a::l) (b::l') := (has_ordering.cmp a b).or_else (list.cmp l l')
instance {α : Type u} [has_ordering α] : has_ordering (list α) :=
⟨list.cmp⟩
def string.cmp (s1 s2 : string) : ordering :=
list.cmp s1.to_list s2.to_list
instance : has_ordering string :=
⟨string.cmp⟩
section
open prod
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [has_ordering α] [has_ordering β]
def prod.cmp : α × β → α × β → ordering
| (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) := (has_ordering.cmp a₁ a₂).or_else (has_ordering.cmp b₁ b₂)
instance {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [has_ordering α] [has_ordering β] : has_ordering (α × β) :=
⟨prod.cmp⟩
end
section
open sum
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [has_ordering α] [has_ordering β]
def sum.cmp : α ⊕ β → α ⊕ β → ordering
| (inl a₁) (inl a₂) := has_ordering.cmp a₁ a₂
| (inr b₁) (inr b₂) := has_ordering.cmp b₁ b₂
| (inl a₁) (inr b₂) := lt
| (inr b₁) (inl a₂) := gt
instance {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [has_ordering α] [has_ordering β] : has_ordering (α ⊕ β) :=
⟨sum.cmp⟩
end
section
open option
variables {α : Type u} [has_ordering α]
def option.cmp : option α → option α → ordering
| (some a₁) (some a₂) := has_ordering.cmp a₁ a₂
| (some a₁) none := gt
| none (some a₂) := lt
| none none := eq
instance {α : Type u} [has_ordering α] : has_ordering (option α) :=
⟨option.cmp⟩
end
|
b99d692e8eeeb429b096f6fd82e745efbdac48fb | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/tactic/ring.lean | 4dcb10f74db63e0f1addc892faec9c9ff8deedaf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 32,558 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import tactic.norm_num
import data.fin.basic
/-!
# `ring`
Evaluate expressions in the language of commutative (semi)rings.
Based on <http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/courses/tt-2014/read/10.1.1.61.3041.pdf> .
-/
namespace tactic
namespace ring
/-- The normal form that `ring` uses is mediated by the function `horner a x n b := a * x ^ n + b`.
The reason we use a definition rather than the (more readable) expression on the right is because
this expression contains a number of typeclass arguments in different positions, while `horner`
contains only one `comm_semiring` instance at the top level. See also `horner_expr` for a
description of normal form. -/
def horner {α} [comm_semiring α] (a x : α) (n : ℕ) (b : α) := a * x ^ n + b
/-- This cache contains data required by the `ring` tactic during execution. -/
meta structure cache :=
(α : expr)
(univ : level)
(comm_semiring_inst : expr)
(red : transparency)
(ic : ref instance_cache)
(nc : ref instance_cache)
(atoms : ref (buffer expr))
/-- The monad that `ring` works in. This is a reader monad containing a mutable cache (using `ref`
for mutability), as well as the list of atoms-up-to-defeq encountered thus far, used for atom
sorting. -/
@[derive [monad, alternative]]
meta def ring_m (α : Type) : Type :=
reader_t cache tactic α
/-- Get the `ring` data from the monad. -/
meta def get_cache : ring_m cache := reader_t.read
/-- Get an already encountered atom by its index. -/
meta def get_atom (n : ℕ) : ring_m expr :=
⟨λ c, do es ← read_ref c.atoms, pure (es.read' n)⟩
/-- Get the index corresponding to an atomic expression, if it has already been encountered, or
put it in the list of atoms and return the new index, otherwise. -/
meta def add_atom (e : expr) : ring_m ℕ :=
⟨λ c, do
let red := c.red,
es ← read_ref c.atoms,
es.iterate failed (λ n e' t, t <|> (is_def_eq e e' red $> n)) <|>
(es.size <$ write_ref c.atoms (es.push_back e))⟩
/-- Lift a tactic into the `ring_m` monad. -/
@[inline] meta def lift {α} (m : tactic α) : ring_m α := reader_t.lift m
/-- Run a `ring_m` tactic in the tactic monad. This version of `ring_m.run` uses an external
atoms ref, so that subexpressions can be named across multiple `ring_m` calls. -/
meta def ring_m.run' (red : transparency) (atoms : ref (buffer expr))
(e : expr) {α} (m : ring_m α) : tactic α :=
do α ← infer_type e,
u ← mk_meta_univ,
infer_type α >>= unify (expr.sort (level.succ u)),
u ← get_univ_assignment u,
ic ← mk_instance_cache α,
(ic, c) ← ic.get ``comm_semiring,
nc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ),
using_new_ref ic $ λ r,
using_new_ref nc $ λ nr,
reader_t.run m ⟨α, u, c, red, r, nr, atoms⟩
/-- Run a `ring_m` tactic in the tactic monad. -/
meta def ring_m.run (red : transparency) (e : expr) {α} (m : ring_m α) : tactic α :=
using_new_ref mk_buffer $ λ atoms, ring_m.run' red atoms e m
/-- Lift an instance cache tactic (probably from `norm_num`) to the `ring_m` monad. This version
is abstract over the instance cache in question (either the ring `α`, or `ℕ` for exponents). -/
@[inline] meta def ic_lift' (icf : cache → ref instance_cache) {α}
(f : instance_cache → tactic (instance_cache × α)) : ring_m α :=
⟨λ c, do
let r := icf c,
ic ← read_ref r,
(ic', a) ← f ic,
a <$ write_ref r ic'⟩
/-- Lift an instance cache tactic (probably from `norm_num`) to the `ring_m` monad. This uses
the instance cache corresponding to the ring `α`. -/
@[inline] meta def ic_lift {α} : (instance_cache → tactic (instance_cache × α)) → ring_m α :=
ic_lift' cache.ic
/-- Lift an instance cache tactic (probably from `norm_num`) to the `ring_m` monad. This uses
the instance cache corresponding to `ℕ`, which is used for computations in the exponent. -/
@[inline] meta def nc_lift {α} : (instance_cache → tactic (instance_cache × α)) → ring_m α :=
ic_lift' cache.nc
/-- Apply a theorem that expects a `comm_semiring` instance. This is a special case of
`ic_lift mk_app`, but it comes up often because `horner` and all its theorems have this assumption;
it also does not require the tactic monad which improves access speed a bit. -/
meta def cache.cs_app (c : cache) (n : name) : list expr → expr :=
(@expr.const tt n [c.univ] c.α c.comm_semiring_inst).mk_app
/-- Every expression in the language of commutative semirings can be viewed as a sum of monomials,
where each monomial is a product of powers of atoms. We fix a global order on atoms (up to
definitional equality), and then separate the terms according to their smallest atom. So the top
level expression is `a * x^n + b` where `x` is the smallest atom and `n > 0` is a numeral, and
`n` is maximal (so `a` contains at least one monomial not containing an `x`), and `b` contains no
monomials with an `x` (hence all atoms in `b` are larger than `x`).
If there is no `x` satisfying these constraints, then the expression must be a numeral. Even though
we are working over rings, we allow rational constants when these can be interpreted in the ring,
so we can solve problems like `x / 3 = 1 / 3 * x` even though these are not technically in the
language of rings.
These constraints ensure that there is a unique normal form for each ring expression, and so the
algorithm is simply to calculate the normal form of each side and compare for equality.
To allow us to efficiently pattern match on normal forms, we maintain this inductive type that
holds a normalized expression together with its structure. All the `expr`s in this type could be
removed without loss of information, and conversely the `horner_expr` structure and the `ℕ` and
`ℚ` values can be recovered from the top level `expr`, but we keep both in order to keep proof
producing normalization functions efficient. -/
meta inductive horner_expr : Type
| const (e : expr) (coeff : ℚ) : horner_expr
| xadd (e : expr) (a : horner_expr) (x : expr × ℕ) (n : expr × ℕ) (b : horner_expr) : horner_expr
/-- Get the expression corresponding to a `horner_expr`. This can be calculated recursively from
the structure, but we cache the exprs in all subterms so that this function can be computed in
constant time. -/
meta def horner_expr.e : horner_expr → expr
| (horner_expr.const e _) := e
| (horner_expr.xadd e _ _ _ _) := e
/-- Is this expr the constant `0`? -/
meta def horner_expr.is_zero : horner_expr → bool
| (horner_expr.const _ c) := c = 0
| _ := ff
meta instance : has_coe horner_expr expr := ⟨horner_expr.e⟩
meta instance : has_coe_to_fun horner_expr (λ _, expr → expr) := ⟨λ e, ⇑(e : expr)⟩
/-- Construct a `xadd` node, generating the cached expr using the input cache. -/
meta def horner_expr.xadd' (c : cache) (a : horner_expr)
(x : expr × ℕ) (n : expr × ℕ) (b : horner_expr) : horner_expr :=
horner_expr.xadd (c.cs_app ``horner [a, x.1, n.1, b]) a x n b
open horner_expr
/-- Pretty printer for `horner_expr`. -/
meta def horner_expr.to_string : horner_expr → string
| (const e c) := to_string (e, c)
| (xadd e a x (_, n) b) :=
"(" ++ a.to_string ++ ") * (" ++ to_string x.1 ++ ")^"
++ to_string n ++ " + " ++ b.to_string
/-- Pretty printer for `horner_expr`. -/
meta def horner_expr.pp : horner_expr → tactic format
| (const e c) := pp (e, c)
| (xadd e a x (_, n) b) := do
pa ← a.pp, pb ← b.pp, px ← pp x.1,
return $ "(" ++ pa ++ ") * (" ++ px ++ ")^" ++ to_string n ++ " + " ++ pb
meta instance : has_to_tactic_format horner_expr := ⟨horner_expr.pp⟩
/-- Reflexivity conversion for a `horner_expr`. -/
meta def horner_expr.refl_conv (e : horner_expr) : ring_m (horner_expr × expr) :=
do p ← lift $ mk_eq_refl e, return (e, p)
theorem zero_horner {α} [comm_semiring α] (x n b) :
@horner α _ 0 x n b = b :=
by simp [horner]
theorem horner_horner {α} [comm_semiring α] (a₁ x n₁ n₂ b n')
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n') :
@horner α _ (horner a₁ x n₁ 0) x n₂ b = horner a₁ x n' b :=
by simp [h.symm, horner, pow_add, mul_assoc]
/-- Evaluate `horner a n x b` where `a` and `b` are already in normal form. -/
meta def eval_horner : horner_expr → expr × ℕ → expr × ℕ → horner_expr → ring_m (horner_expr × expr)
| ha@(const a coeff) x n b := do
c ← get_cache,
if coeff = 0 then
return (b, c.cs_app ``zero_horner [x.1, n.1, b])
else (xadd' c ha x n b).refl_conv
| ha@(xadd a a₁ x₁ n₁ b₁) x n b := do
c ← get_cache,
if x₁.2 = x.2 ∧ b₁.e.to_nat = some 0 then do
(n', h) ← nc_lift $ λ nc, norm_num.prove_add_nat' nc n₁.1 n.1,
return (xadd' c a₁ x (n', n₁.2 + n.2) b,
c.cs_app ``horner_horner [a₁, x.1, n₁.1, n.1, b, n', h])
else (xadd' c ha x n b).refl_conv
theorem const_add_horner {α} [comm_semiring α] (k a x n b b') (h : k + b = b') :
k + @horner α _ a x n b = horner a x n b' :=
by simp [h.symm, horner]; cc
theorem horner_add_const {α} [comm_semiring α] (a x n b k b') (h : b + k = b') :
@horner α _ a x n b + k = horner a x n b' :=
by simp [h.symm, horner, add_assoc]
theorem horner_add_horner_lt {α} [comm_semiring α] (a₁ x n₁ b₁ a₂ n₂ b₂ k a' b')
(h₁ : n₁ + k = n₂) (h₂ : (a₁ + horner a₂ x k 0 : α) = a') (h₃ : b₁ + b₂ = b') :
@horner α _ a₁ x n₁ b₁ + horner a₂ x n₂ b₂ = horner a' x n₁ b' :=
by simp [h₂.symm, h₃.symm, h₁.symm, horner, pow_add, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]; cc
theorem horner_add_horner_gt {α} [comm_semiring α] (a₁ x n₁ b₁ a₂ n₂ b₂ k a' b')
(h₁ : n₂ + k = n₁) (h₂ : (horner a₁ x k 0 + a₂ : α) = a') (h₃ : b₁ + b₂ = b') :
@horner α _ a₁ x n₁ b₁ + horner a₂ x n₂ b₂ = horner a' x n₂ b' :=
by simp [h₂.symm, h₃.symm, h₁.symm, horner, pow_add, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]; cc
theorem horner_add_horner_eq {α} [comm_semiring α] (a₁ x n b₁ a₂ b₂ a' b' t)
(h₁ : a₁ + a₂ = a') (h₂ : b₁ + b₂ = b') (h₃ : horner a' x n b' = t) :
@horner α _ a₁ x n b₁ + horner a₂ x n b₂ = t :=
by simp [h₃.symm, h₂.symm, h₁.symm, horner, add_mul, mul_comm (x ^ n)]; cc
/-- Evaluate `a + b` where `a` and `b` are already in normal form. -/
meta def eval_add : horner_expr → horner_expr → ring_m (horner_expr × expr)
| (const e₁ c₁) (const e₂ c₂) := ic_lift $ λ ic, do
let n := c₁ + c₂,
(ic, e) ← ic.of_rat n,
(ic, p) ← norm_num.prove_add_rat ic e₁ e₂ e c₁ c₂ n,
return (ic, const e n, p)
| he₁@(const e₁ c₁) he₂@(xadd e₂ a x n b) := do
c ← get_cache,
if c₁ = 0 then ic_lift $ λ ic, do
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``zero_add [e₂],
return (ic, he₂, p)
else do
(b', h) ← eval_add he₁ b,
return (xadd' c a x n b',
c.cs_app ``const_add_horner [e₁, a, x.1, n.1, b, b', h])
| he₁@(xadd e₁ a x n b) he₂@(const e₂ c₂) := do
c ← get_cache,
if c₂ = 0 then ic_lift $ λ ic, do
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``add_zero [e₁],
return (ic, he₁, p)
else do
(b', h) ← eval_add b he₂,
return (xadd' c a x n b',
c.cs_app ``horner_add_const [a, x.1, n.1, b, e₂, b', h])
| he₁@(xadd e₁ a₁ x₁ n₁ b₁) he₂@(xadd e₂ a₂ x₂ n₂ b₂) := do
c ← get_cache,
if x₁.2 < x₂.2 then do
(b', h) ← eval_add b₁ he₂,
return (xadd' c a₁ x₁ n₁ b',
c.cs_app ``horner_add_const [a₁, x₁.1, n₁.1, b₁, e₂, b', h])
else if x₁.2 ≠ x₂.2 then do
(b', h) ← eval_add he₁ b₂,
return (xadd' c a₂ x₂ n₂ b',
c.cs_app ``const_add_horner [e₁, a₂, x₂.1, n₂.1, b₂, b', h])
else if n₁.2 < n₂.2 then do
let k := n₂.2 - n₁.2,
(ek, h₁) ← nc_lift (λ nc, do
(nc, ek) ← nc.of_nat k,
(nc, h₁) ← norm_num.prove_add_nat nc n₁.1 ek n₂.1,
return (nc, ek, h₁)),
α0 ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
(a', h₂) ← eval_add a₁ (xadd' c a₂ x₁ (ek, k) (const α0 0)),
(b', h₃) ← eval_add b₁ b₂,
return (xadd' c a' x₁ n₁ b',
c.cs_app ``horner_add_horner_lt [a₁, x₁.1, n₁.1, b₁, a₂, n₂.1, b₂, ek, a', b', h₁, h₂, h₃])
else if n₁.2 ≠ n₂.2 then do
let k := n₁.2 - n₂.2,
(ek, h₁) ← nc_lift (λ nc, do
(nc, ek) ← nc.of_nat k,
(nc, h₁) ← norm_num.prove_add_nat nc n₂.1 ek n₁.1,
return (nc, ek, h₁)),
α0 ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
(a', h₂) ← eval_add (xadd' c a₁ x₁ (ek, k) (const α0 0)) a₂,
(b', h₃) ← eval_add b₁ b₂,
return (xadd' c a' x₁ n₂ b',
c.cs_app ``horner_add_horner_gt [a₁, x₁.1, n₁.1, b₁, a₂, n₂.1, b₂, ek, a', b', h₁, h₂, h₃])
else do
(a', h₁) ← eval_add a₁ a₂,
(b', h₂) ← eval_add b₁ b₂,
(t, h₃) ← eval_horner a' x₁ n₁ b',
return (t, c.cs_app ``horner_add_horner_eq
[a₁, x₁.1, n₁.1, b₁, a₂, b₂, a', b', t, h₁, h₂, h₃])
theorem horner_neg {α} [comm_ring α] (a x n b a' b')
(h₁ : -a = a') (h₂ : -b = b') :
-@horner α _ a x n b = horner a' x n b' :=
by simp [h₂.symm, h₁.symm, horner]; cc
/-- Evaluate `-a` where `a` is already in normal form. -/
meta def eval_neg : horner_expr → ring_m (horner_expr × expr)
| (const e coeff) := do
(e', p) ← ic_lift $ λ ic, norm_num.prove_neg ic e,
return (const e' (-coeff), p)
| (xadd e a x n b) := do
c ← get_cache,
(a', h₁) ← eval_neg a,
(b', h₂) ← eval_neg b,
p ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``horner_neg [a, x.1, n.1, b, a', b', h₁, h₂],
return (xadd' c a' x n b', p)
theorem horner_const_mul {α} [comm_semiring α] (c a x n b a' b')
(h₁ : c * a = a') (h₂ : c * b = b') :
c * @horner α _ a x n b = horner a' x n b' :=
by simp [h₂.symm, h₁.symm, horner, mul_add, mul_assoc]
theorem horner_mul_const {α} [comm_semiring α] (a x n b c a' b')
(h₁ : a * c = a') (h₂ : b * c = b') :
@horner α _ a x n b * c = horner a' x n b' :=
by simp [h₂.symm, h₁.symm, horner, add_mul, mul_right_comm]
/-- Evaluate `k * a` where `k` is a rational numeral and `a` is in normal form. -/
meta def eval_const_mul (k : expr × ℚ) :
horner_expr → ring_m (horner_expr × expr)
| (const e coeff) := do
(e', p) ← ic_lift $ λ ic, norm_num.prove_mul_rat ic k.1 e k.2 coeff,
return (const e' (k.2 * coeff), p)
| (xadd e a x n b) := do
c ← get_cache,
(a', h₁) ← eval_const_mul a,
(b', h₂) ← eval_const_mul b,
return (xadd' c a' x n b',
c.cs_app ``horner_const_mul [k.1, a, x.1, n.1, b, a', b', h₁, h₂])
theorem horner_mul_horner_zero {α} [comm_semiring α] (a₁ x n₁ b₁ a₂ n₂ aa t)
(h₁ : @horner α _ a₁ x n₁ b₁ * a₂ = aa)
(h₂ : horner aa x n₂ 0 = t) :
horner a₁ x n₁ b₁ * horner a₂ x n₂ 0 = t :=
by rw [← h₂, ← h₁];
simp [horner, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
theorem horner_mul_horner {α} [comm_semiring α]
(a₁ x n₁ b₁ a₂ n₂ b₂ aa haa ab bb t)
(h₁ : @horner α _ a₁ x n₁ b₁ * a₂ = aa)
(h₂ : horner aa x n₂ 0 = haa)
(h₃ : a₁ * b₂ = ab) (h₄ : b₁ * b₂ = bb)
(H : haa + horner ab x n₁ bb = t) :
horner a₁ x n₁ b₁ * horner a₂ x n₂ b₂ = t :=
by rw [← H, ← h₂, ← h₁, ← h₃, ← h₄];
simp [horner, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
/-- Evaluate `a * b` where `a` and `b` are in normal form. -/
meta def eval_mul : horner_expr → horner_expr → ring_m (horner_expr × expr)
| (const e₁ c₁) (const e₂ c₂) := do
(e', p) ← ic_lift $ λ ic, norm_num.prove_mul_rat ic e₁ e₂ c₁ c₂,
return (const e' (c₁ * c₂), p)
| (const e₁ c₁) e₂ :=
if c₁ = 0 then do
c ← get_cache,
α0 ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
p ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``zero_mul [e₂],
return (const α0 0, p)
else if c₁ = 1 then do
p ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``one_mul [e₂],
return (e₂, p)
else eval_const_mul (e₁, c₁) e₂
| e₁ he₂@(const e₂ c₂) := do
p₁ ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``mul_comm [e₁, e₂],
(e', p₂) ← eval_mul he₂ e₁,
p ← lift $ mk_eq_trans p₁ p₂, return (e', p)
| he₁@(xadd e₁ a₁ x₁ n₁ b₁) he₂@(xadd e₂ a₂ x₂ n₂ b₂) := do
c ← get_cache,
if x₁.2 < x₂.2 then do
(a', h₁) ← eval_mul a₁ he₂,
(b', h₂) ← eval_mul b₁ he₂,
return (xadd' c a' x₁ n₁ b',
c.cs_app ``horner_mul_const [a₁, x₁.1, n₁.1, b₁, e₂, a', b', h₁, h₂])
else if x₁.2 ≠ x₂.2 then do
(a', h₁) ← eval_mul he₁ a₂,
(b', h₂) ← eval_mul he₁ b₂,
return (xadd' c a' x₂ n₂ b',
c.cs_app ``horner_const_mul [e₁, a₂, x₂.1, n₂.1, b₂, a', b', h₁, h₂])
else do
(aa, h₁) ← eval_mul he₁ a₂,
α0 ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
(haa, h₂) ← eval_horner aa x₁ n₂ (const α0 0),
if b₂.is_zero then
return (haa, c.cs_app ``horner_mul_horner_zero
[a₁, x₁.1, n₁.1, b₁, a₂, n₂.1, aa, haa, h₁, h₂])
else do
(ab, h₃) ← eval_mul a₁ b₂,
(bb, h₄) ← eval_mul b₁ b₂,
(t, H) ← eval_add haa (xadd' c ab x₁ n₁ bb),
return (t, c.cs_app ``horner_mul_horner
[a₁, x₁.1, n₁.1, b₁, a₂, n₂.1, b₂, aa, haa, ab, bb, t, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄, H])
theorem horner_pow {α} [comm_semiring α] (a x n m n' a') (h₁ : n * m = n') (h₂ : a ^ m = a') :
@horner α _ a x n 0 ^ m = horner a' x n' 0 :=
by simp [h₁.symm, h₂.symm, horner, mul_pow, pow_mul]
theorem pow_succ {α} [comm_semiring α] (a n b c)
(h₁ : (a:α) ^ n = b) (h₂ : b * a = c) : a ^ (n + 1) = c :=
by rw [← h₂, ← h₁, pow_succ']
/-- Evaluate `a ^ n` where `a` is in normal form and `n` is a natural numeral. -/
meta def eval_pow : horner_expr → expr × ℕ → ring_m (horner_expr × expr)
| e (_, 0) := do
c ← get_cache,
α1 ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_one.one [],
p ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``pow_zero [e],
return (const α1 1, p)
| e (_, 1) := do
p ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``pow_one [e],
return (e, p)
| (const e coeff) (e₂, m) := ic_lift $ λ ic, do
(ic, e', p) ← norm_num.prove_pow e coeff ic e₂,
return (ic, const e' (coeff ^ m), p)
| he@(xadd e a x n b) m := do
c ← get_cache,
match b.e.to_nat with
| some 0 := do
(n', h₁) ← nc_lift $ λ nc, norm_num.prove_mul_rat nc n.1 m.1 n.2 m.2,
(a', h₂) ← eval_pow a m,
α0 ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
return (xadd' c a' x (n', n.2 * m.2) (const α0 0),
c.cs_app ``horner_pow [a, x.1, n.1, m.1, n', a', h₁, h₂])
| _ := do
e₂ ← nc_lift $ λ nc, nc.of_nat (m.2-1),
(tl, hl) ← eval_pow he (e₂, m.2-1),
(t, p₂) ← eval_mul tl he,
return (t, c.cs_app ``pow_succ [e, e₂, tl, t, hl, p₂])
end
theorem horner_atom {α} [comm_semiring α] (x : α) : x = horner 1 x 1 0 :=
by simp [horner]
/-- Evaluate `a` where `a` is an atom. -/
meta def eval_atom (e : expr) : ring_m (horner_expr × expr) :=
do c ← get_cache,
i ← add_atom e,
α0 ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
α1 ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_one.one [],
return (xadd' c (const α1 1) (e, i) (`(1), 1) (const α0 0),
c.cs_app ``horner_atom [e])
/-- Evaluate `a` where `a` is an atom. -/
meta def eval_norm_atom (norm_atom : expr → tactic (expr × expr))
(e : expr) : ring_m (horner_expr × expr) :=
do o ← lift $ try_core (guard (e.get_app_args.length > 0) >> norm_atom e),
match o with
| none := eval_atom e
| some (e', p) := do
(e₂, p₂) ← eval_atom e',
prod.mk e₂ <$> lift (mk_eq_trans p p₂)
end
lemma subst_into_pow {α} [monoid α] (l r tl tr t)
(prl : (l : α) = tl) (prr : (r : ℕ) = tr) (prt : tl ^ tr = t) : l ^ r = t :=
by rw [prl, prr, prt]
lemma unfold_sub {α} [add_group α] (a b c : α)
(h : a + -b = c) : a - b = c :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, h]
lemma unfold_div {α} [division_ring α] (a b c : α)
(h : a * b⁻¹ = c) : a / b = c :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, h]
/-- Evaluate a ring expression `e` recursively to normal form, together with a proof of
equality. -/
meta def eval (norm_atom : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) : expr → ring_m (horner_expr × expr)
| `(%%e₁ + %%e₂) := do
(e₁', p₁) ← eval e₁,
(e₂', p₂) ← eval e₂,
(e', p') ← eval_add e₁' e₂',
p ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``norm_num.subst_into_add [e₁, e₂, e₁', e₂', e', p₁, p₂, p'],
return (e', p)
| e@`(@has_sub.sub %%α %%inst %%e₁ %%e₂) :=
mcond (succeeds (lift $ mk_app ``comm_ring [α] >>= mk_instance))
(do
e₂' ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [e₂],
e ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_add.add [e₁, e₂'],
(e', p) ← eval e,
p' ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``unfold_sub [e₁, e₂, e', p],
return (e', p'))
(eval_norm_atom norm_atom e)
| `(- %%e) := do
(e₁, p₁) ← eval e,
(e₂, p₂) ← eval_neg e₁,
p ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``norm_num.subst_into_neg [e, e₁, e₂, p₁, p₂],
return (e₂, p)
| `(%%e₁ * %%e₂) := do
(e₁', p₁) ← eval e₁,
(e₂', p₂) ← eval e₂,
(e', p') ← eval_mul e₁' e₂',
p ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``norm_num.subst_into_mul [e₁, e₂, e₁', e₂', e', p₁, p₂, p'],
return (e', p)
| e@`(has_inv.inv %%_) := (do
(e', p) ← lift $ norm_num.derive e <|> refl_conv e,
n ← lift $ e'.to_rat,
return (const e' n, p)) <|> eval_norm_atom norm_atom e
| e@`(@has_div.div _ %%inst %%e₁ %%e₂) := mcond
(succeeds (do
inst' ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``div_inv_monoid.to_has_div [],
lift $ is_def_eq inst inst'))
(do
e₂' ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_inv.inv [e₂],
e ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``has_mul.mul [e₁, e₂'],
(e', p) ← eval e,
p' ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``unfold_div [e₁, e₂, e', p],
return (e', p'))
(eval_norm_atom norm_atom e)
| e@`(@has_pow.pow _ _ %%inst %%e₁ %%e₂) := mcond
(succeeds (do
inst' ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``monoid.has_pow [],
lift $ is_def_eq inst inst'))
(do
(e₂', p₂) ← lift $ norm_num.derive e₂ <|> refl_conv e₂,
match e₂'.to_nat with
| some k := do
(e₁', p₁) ← eval e₁,
(e', p') ← eval_pow e₁' (e₂, k),
p ← ic_lift $ λ ic, ic.mk_app ``subst_into_pow [e₁, e₂, e₁', e₂', e', p₁, p₂, p'],
return (e', p)
| _ := eval_norm_atom norm_atom e
end)
(eval_norm_atom norm_atom e)
| e := match e.to_nat with
| some n := (const e n).refl_conv
| none := eval_norm_atom norm_atom e
end
/-- Evaluate a ring expression `e` recursively to normal form, together with a proof of
equality. -/
meta def eval' (red : transparency) (atoms : ref (buffer expr))
(norm_atom : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
ring_m.run' red atoms e $ do (e', p) ← eval norm_atom e, return (e', p)
theorem horner_def' {α} [comm_semiring α] (a x n b) : @horner α _ a x n b = x ^ n * a + b :=
by simp [horner, mul_comm]
theorem mul_assoc_rev {α} [semigroup α] (a b c : α) : a * (b * c) = a * b * c :=
by simp [mul_assoc]
theorem pow_add_rev {α} [monoid α] (a : α) (m n : ℕ) : a ^ m * a ^ n = a ^ (m + n) :=
by simp [pow_add]
theorem pow_add_rev_right {α} [monoid α] (a b : α) (m n : ℕ) :
b * a ^ m * a ^ n = b * a ^ (m + n) :=
by simp [pow_add, mul_assoc]
theorem add_neg_eq_sub {α} [add_group α] (a b : α) : a + -b = a - b := (sub_eq_add_neg a b).symm
/-- If `ring` fails to close the goal, it falls back on normalizing the expression to a "pretty"
form so that you can see why it failed. This setting adjusts the resulting form:
* `raw` is the form that `ring` actually uses internally, with iterated applications of `horner`.
Not very readable but useful if you don't want any postprocessing.
This results in terms like `horner (horner (horner 3 y 1 0) x 2 1) x 1 (horner 1 y 1 0)`.
* `horner` maintains the Horner form structure, but it unfolds the `horner` definition itself,
and tries to otherwise minimize parentheses.
This results in terms like `(3 * x ^ 2 * y + 1) * x + y`.
* `SOP` means sum of products form, expanding everything to monomials.
This results in terms like `3 * x ^ 3 * y + x + y`. -/
@[derive [has_reflect, decidable_eq]]
inductive normalize_mode | raw | SOP | horner
instance : inhabited normalize_mode := ⟨normalize_mode.horner⟩
/-- A `ring`-based normalization simplifier that rewrites ring expressions into the specified mode.
See `normalize`. This version takes a list of atoms to persist across multiple calls.
* `atoms`: a mutable reference containing the atom set from the previous call
* `red`: the reducibility setting to use when comparing atoms for defeq
* `mode`: the normalization style (see `normalize_mode`)
* `recursive`: if true, atoms will be reduced recursively using `normalize'`
* `e`: the expression to normalize
* `inner`: This should be set to `ff`. It is used internally to disable normalization
at the top level when called from `eval` in order to prevent an infinite loop
`eval' -> eval_atom -> normalize' -> eval'` when called on something that can't
be simplified like `x`.
-/
meta def normalize' (atoms : ref (buffer expr))
(red : transparency) (mode := normalize_mode.horner) (recursive := tt) :
expr → opt_param _ ff → tactic (expr × expr)
| e inner := do
pow_lemma ← simp_lemmas.mk.add_simp ``pow_one,
let lemmas := match mode with
| normalize_mode.SOP :=
[``horner_def', ``add_zero, ``mul_one, ``mul_add, ``mul_sub,
``mul_assoc_rev, ``pow_add_rev, ``pow_add_rev_right,
``mul_neg, ``add_neg_eq_sub]
| normalize_mode.horner :=
[``horner.equations._eqn_1, ``add_zero, ``one_mul, ``pow_one,
``neg_mul, ``add_neg_eq_sub]
| _ := []
end,
lemmas ← lemmas.mfoldl simp_lemmas.add_simp simp_lemmas.mk,
trans_conv
(λ e, do
guard (mode ≠ normalize_mode.raw),
(e', pr, _) ← simplify simp_lemmas.mk [] e,
pure (e', pr))
(λ e, do
a ← read_ref atoms,
let norm_rec := if recursive then λ e, normalize' e tt else λ _, failed,
(a, e', pr) ← ext_simplify_core a {}
simp_lemmas.mk (λ _, failed) (λ a _ _ p e, do
guard (inner → p.is_some),
write_ref atoms a,
(new_e, pr) ← eval' red atoms norm_rec e,
(new_e, pr) ← match mode with
| normalize_mode.raw := λ _, pure (new_e, pr)
| normalize_mode.horner := trans_conv (λ _, pure (new_e, pr))
(λ e, do (e', prf, _) ← simplify lemmas [] e, pure (e', prf))
| normalize_mode.SOP :=
trans_conv (λ _, pure (new_e, pr)) $
trans_conv (λ e, do (e', prf, _) ← simplify lemmas [] e, pure (e', prf)) $
simp_bottom_up' (λ e, norm_num.derive e <|> pow_lemma.rewrite e)
end e,
guard (¬ new_e =ₐ e),
a ← read_ref atoms,
pure (a, new_e, some pr, ff))
(λ _ _ _ _ _, failed) `eq e,
write_ref atoms a,
pure (e', pr))
e
/-- A `ring`-based normalization simplifier that rewrites ring expressions into the specified mode.
* `raw` is the form that `ring` actually uses internally, with iterated applications of `horner`.
Not very readable but useful if you don't want any postprocessing.
This results in terms like `horner (horner (horner 3 y 1 0) x 2 1) x 1 (horner 1 y 1 0)`.
* `horner` maintains the Horner form structure, but it unfolds the `horner` definition itself,
and tries to otherwise minimize parentheses.
This results in terms like `(3 * x ^ 2 * y + 1) * x + y`.
* `SOP` means sum of products form, expanding everything to monomials.
This results in terms like `3 * x ^ 3 * y + x + y`. -/
meta def normalize (red : transparency) (mode := normalize_mode.horner)
(recursive := tt) (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
using_new_ref mk_buffer $ λ atoms, normalize' atoms red mode recursive e
/-- Configuration for `ring_nf`.
* `recursive`: if true, atoms inside ring expressions will be reduced recursively
-/
@[derive inhabited] structure ring_nf_cfg := (recursive := tt)
end ring
namespace interactive
open tactic.ring
setup_tactic_parser
/-- Tactic for solving equations in the language of *commutative* (semi)rings.
This version of `ring` fails if the target is not an equality
that is provable by the axioms of commutative (semi)rings. -/
meta def ring1 (red : parse (tk "!")?) : tactic unit :=
let transp := if red.is_some then semireducible else reducible in
do `(%%e₁ = %%e₂) ← target >>= instantiate_mvars,
((e₁', p₁), (e₂', p₂)) ← ring_m.run transp e₁ $
prod.mk <$> eval (λ _, failed) e₁ <*> eval (λ _, failed) e₂,
is_def_eq e₁' e₂',
p ← mk_eq_symm p₂ >>= mk_eq_trans p₁,
tactic.exact p
/-- Parser for `ring_nf`'s `mode` argument, which can only be the "keywords" `raw`, `horner` or
`SOP`. (Because these are not actually keywords we use a name parser and postprocess the result.)
-/
meta def ring.mode : lean.parser ring.normalize_mode :=
with_desc "(SOP|raw|horner)?" $
do mode ← ident?, match mode with
| none := pure ring.normalize_mode.horner
| some `horner := pure ring.normalize_mode.horner
| some `SOP := pure ring.normalize_mode.SOP
| some `raw := pure ring.normalize_mode.raw
| _ := failed
end
/-- Simplification tactic for expressions in the language of commutative (semi)rings,
which rewrites all ring expressions into a normal form. When writing a normal form,
`ring_nf SOP` will use sum-of-products form instead of horner form.
`ring_nf!` will use a more aggressive reducibility setting to identify atoms.
-/
meta def ring_nf (red : parse (tk "!")?) (SOP : parse ring.mode) (loc : parse location)
(cfg : ring_nf_cfg := {}) : tactic unit :=
do ns ← loc.get_locals,
let transp := if red.is_some then semireducible else reducible,
tt ← using_new_ref mk_buffer $ λ atoms,
tactic.replace_at (normalize' atoms transp SOP cfg.recursive) ns loc.include_goal
| fail "ring_nf failed to simplify",
when loc.include_goal $ try tactic.reflexivity
/-- Tactic for solving equations in the language of *commutative* (semi)rings.
`ring!` will use a more aggressive reducibility setting to identify atoms.
If the goal is not solvable, it falls back to rewriting all ring expressions
into a normal form, with a suggestion to use `ring_nf` instead, if this is the intent.
See also `ring1`, which is the same as `ring` but without the fallback behavior.
Based on [Proving Equalities in a Commutative Ring Done Right
in Coq](http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/courses/tt-2014/read/10.1.1.61.3041.pdf) by Benjamin Grégoire
and Assia Mahboubi.
-/
meta def ring (red : parse (tk "!")?) : tactic unit :=
ring1 red <|>
(ring_nf red normalize_mode.horner (loc.ns [none]) >> trace "Try this: ring_nf")
add_hint_tactic "ring"
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "ring",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [``ring, ``ring_nf, ``ring1],
inherit_description_from := ``ring,
tags := ["arithmetic", "simplification", "decision procedure"] }
end interactive
end tactic
namespace conv.interactive
open conv interactive
open tactic tactic.interactive (ring.mode ring1)
open tactic.ring (normalize normalize_mode.horner)
local postfix (name := parser.optional) `?`:9001 := optional
/--
Normalises expressions in commutative (semi-)rings inside of a `conv` block using the tactic `ring`.
-/
meta def ring_nf (red : parse (lean.parser.tk "!")?) (SOP : parse ring.mode)
(cfg : ring.ring_nf_cfg := {}) : conv unit :=
let transp := if red.is_some then semireducible else reducible in
replace_lhs (normalize transp SOP cfg.recursive)
<|> fail "ring_nf failed to simplify"
/--
Normalises expressions in commutative (semi-)rings inside of a `conv` block using the tactic `ring`.
-/
meta def ring (red : parse (lean.parser.tk "!")?) : conv unit :=
let transp := if red.is_some then semireducible else reducible in
discharge_eq_lhs (ring1 red)
<|> (replace_lhs (normalize transp normalize_mode.horner) >> trace "Try this: ring_nf")
<|> fail "ring failed to simplify"
end conv.interactive
|
488e1c090f41bf9c05a5e33ffd5e6cdcfa38d534 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/data/nat/upto.lean | e8996cd788fc8338eeec3167010a81da7b2865b8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,386 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import data.nat.order.basic
/-!
# `nat.upto`
`nat.upto p`, with `p` a predicate on `ℕ`, is a subtype of elements `n : ℕ` such that no value
(strictly) below `n` satisfies `p`.
This type has the property that `>` is well-founded when `∃ i, p i`, which allows us to implement
searches on `ℕ`, starting at `0` and with an unknown upper-bound.
It is similar to the well founded relation constructed to define `nat.find` with
the difference that, in `nat.upto p`, `p` does not need to be decidable. In fact,
`nat.find` could be slightly altered to factor decidability out of its
well founded relation and would then fulfill the same purpose as this file.
-/
namespace nat
/-- The subtype of natural numbers `i` which have the property that
no `j` less than `i` satisfies `p`. This is an initial segment of the
natural numbers, up to and including the first value satisfying `p`.
We will be particularly interested in the case where there exists a value
satisfying `p`, because in this case the `>` relation is well-founded. -/
@[reducible]
def upto (p : ℕ → Prop) : Type := {i : ℕ // ∀ j < i, ¬ p j}
namespace upto
variable {p : ℕ → Prop}
/-- Lift the "greater than" relation on natural numbers to `nat.upto`. -/
protected def gt (p) (x y : upto p) : Prop := x.1 > y.1
instance : has_lt (upto p) := ⟨λ x y, x.1 < y.1⟩
/-- The "greater than" relation on `upto p` is well founded if (and only if) there exists a value
satisfying `p`. -/
protected lemma wf : (∃ x, p x) → well_founded (upto.gt p)
| ⟨x, h⟩ := begin
suffices : upto.gt p = measure (λ y : nat.upto p, x - y.val),
{ rw this, apply measure_wf },
ext ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, _⟩,
dsimp [measure, inv_image, upto.gt],
rw tsub_lt_tsub_iff_left_of_le,
exact le_of_not_lt (λ h', ha _ h' h),
end
/-- Zero is always a member of `nat.upto p` because it has no predecessors. -/
def zero : nat.upto p := ⟨0, λ j h, false.elim (nat.not_lt_zero _ h)⟩
/-- The successor of `n` is in `nat.upto p` provided that `n` doesn't satisfy `p`. -/
def succ (x : nat.upto p) (h : ¬ p x.val) : nat.upto p :=
⟨x.val.succ, λ j h', begin
rcases nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 h' with h' | rfl;
[exact x.2 _ h', exact h]
end⟩
end upto
end nat
|
081130e80d78c3998f638f1e6cb155b9581bac0d | 4efff1f47634ff19e2f786deadd394270a59ecd2 | /src/topology/algebra/ordered.lean | 1f1096a1a08c628333a22a1244fa379c5af03446 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | agjftucker/mathlib | d634cd0d5256b6325e3c55bb7fb2403548371707 | 87fe50de17b00af533f72a102d0adefe4a2285e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,378,131,941 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 160,748,509 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,141,789,000 | 1,544,141,789,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 117,668 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import tactic.tfae
import order.liminf_limsup
import data.set.intervals.image_preimage
import data.set.intervals.ord_connected
import data.set.intervals.surj_on
import topology.algebra.group
import topology.extend_from_subset
import order.filter.interval
/-!
# Theory of topology on ordered spaces
## Main definitions
The order topology on an ordered space is the topology generated by all open intervals (or
equivalently by those of the form `(-∞, a)` and `(b, +∞)`). We define it as `preorder.topology α`.
However, we do *not* register it as an instance (as many existing ordered types already have
topologies, which would be equal but not definitionally equal to `preorder.topology α`). Instead,
we introduce a class `order_topology α`(which is a `Prop`, also known as a mixin) saying that on
the type `α` having already a topological space structure and a preorder structure, the topological
structure is equal to the order topology.
We also introduce another (mixin) class `order_closed_topology α` saying that the set of points
`(x, y)` with `x ≤ y` is closed in the product space. This is automatically satisfied on a linear
order with the order topology.
We prove many basic properties of such topologies.
## Main statements
This file contains the proofs of the following facts. For exact requirements (`order_closed_topology`
vs `order_topology`, `preorder` vs `partial_order` vs `linear_order` etc) see their statements.
### Open / closed sets
* `is_open_lt` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x < g x}` is open;
* `is_open_Iio`, `is_open_Ioi`, `is_open_Ioo` : open intervals are open;
* `is_closed_le` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x ≤ g x}` is closed;
* `is_closed_Iic`, `is_closed_Ici`, `is_closed_Icc` : closed intervals are closed;
* `frontier_le_subset_eq`, `frontier_lt_subset_eq` : frontiers of both `{x | f x ≤ g x}`
and `{x | f x < g x}` are included by `{x | f x = g x}`;
* `exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds`, `exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds` : if `x < y`, then any
neighborhood of `x` includes an interval `[x, z)` for some `z ∈ (x, y]`, and any neighborhood
of `y` includes an interval `(z, y]` for some `z ∈ [x, y)`.
### Convergence and inequalities
* `le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a`, `g` converges to `b`, and eventually
`f x ≤ g x`, then `a ≤ b`
* `le_of_tendsto`, `ge_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a` and eventually `f x ≤ b`
(resp., `b ≤ f x`), then `a ≤ b` (resp., `b ≤ a); we also provide primed versions
that assume the inequalities to hold for all `x`.
### Min, max, `Sup` and `Inf`
* `continuous.min`, `continuous.max`: pointwise `min`/`max` of two continuous functions is
continuous.
* `tendsto.min`, `tendsto.max` : if `f` tends to `a` and `g` tends to `b`, then their pointwise
`min`/`max` tend to `min a b` and `max a b`, respectively.
* `tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le` : theorem known as squeeze theorem,
sandwich theorem, theorem of Carabinieri, and two policemen (and a drunk) theorem; if `g` and `h`
both converge to `a`, and eventually `g x ≤ f x ≤ h x`, then `f` converges to `a`.
### Connected sets and Intermediate Value Theorem
* `is_preconnected_I??` : all intervals `I??` are preconnected,
* `is_preconnected.intermediate_value`, `intermediate_value_univ` : Intermediate Value Theorem for
connected sets and connected spaces, respectively;
* `intermediate_value_Icc`, `intermediate_value_Icc'`: Intermediate Value Theorem for functions
on closed intervals.
### Miscellaneous facts
* `is_compact.exists_forall_le`, `is_compact.exists_forall_ge` : extreme value theorem, a continuous
function on a compact set takes its minimum and maximum values.
* `is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhds_within` : “Continuous induction” principle;
if `s ∩ [a, b]` is closed, `a ∈ s`, and for each `x ∈ [a, b) ∩ s` some of its right neighborhoods
is included `s`, then `[a, b] ⊆ s`.
* `is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt`, `is_closed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt` : two
other versions of the “continuous induction” principle.
## Implementation
We do _not_ register the order topology as an instance on a preorder (or even on a linear order).
Indeed, on many such spaces, a topology has already been constructed in a different way (think
of the discrete spaces `ℕ` or `ℤ`, or `ℝ` that could inherit a topology as the completion of `ℚ`),
and is in general not defeq to the one generated by the intervals. We make it available as a
definition `preorder.topology α` though, that can be registered as an instance when necessary, or
for specific types.
-/
open classical set filter topological_space
open function (curry uncurry)
open_locale topological_space classical filter
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- A topology on a set which is both a topological space and a preorder is _order-closed_ if the
set of points `(x, y)` with `x ≤ y` is closed in the product space. We introduce this as a mixin.
This property is satisfied for the order topology on a linear order, but it can be satisfied more
generally, and suffices to derive many interesting properties relating order and topology. -/
class order_closed_topology (α : Type*) [topological_space α] [preorder α] : Prop :=
(is_closed_le' : is_closed {p:α×α | p.1 ≤ p.2})
instance : Π [topological_space α], topological_space (order_dual α) := id
section order_closed_topology
section preorder
variables [topological_space α] [preorder α] [t : order_closed_topology α]
include t
lemma is_closed_le [topological_space β] {f g : β → α} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
is_closed {b | f b ≤ g b} :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.mp (hf.prod_mk hg) _ t.is_closed_le'
lemma is_closed_le' (a : α) : is_closed {b | b ≤ a} :=
is_closed_le continuous_id continuous_const
lemma is_closed_Iic {a : α} : is_closed (Iic a) :=
is_closed_le' a
lemma is_closed_ge' (a : α) : is_closed {b | a ≤ b} :=
is_closed_le continuous_const continuous_id
lemma is_closed_Ici {a : α} : is_closed (Ici a) :=
is_closed_ge' a
instance : order_closed_topology (order_dual α) :=
⟨continuous_swap _ (@order_closed_topology.is_closed_le' α _ _ _)⟩
lemma is_closed_Icc {a b : α} : is_closed (Icc a b) :=
is_closed_inter is_closed_Ici is_closed_Iic
@[simp] lemma closure_Icc (a b : α) : closure (Icc a b) = Icc a b :=
is_closed_Icc.closure_eq
@[simp] lemma closure_Iic (a : α) : closure (Iic a) = Iic a :=
is_closed_Iic.closure_eq
@[simp] lemma closure_Ici (a : α) : closure (Ici a) = Ici a :=
is_closed_Ici.closure_eq
lemma le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto {f g : β → α} {b : filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} [ne_bot b]
(hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) (h : f ≤ᶠ[b] g) :
a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
have tendsto (λb, (f b, g b)) b (𝓝 (a₁, a₂)),
by rw [nhds_prod_eq]; exact hf.prod_mk hg,
show (a₁, a₂) ∈ {p:α×α | p.1 ≤ p.2},
from t.is_closed_le'.mem_of_tendsto this h
lemma le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' {f g : β → α} {b : filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} [ne_bot b]
(hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) (h : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto hf hg (eventually_of_forall h)
lemma le_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {a b : α} {x : filter β}
[ne_bot x] (lim : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (h : ∀ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto lim tendsto_const_nhds h
lemma le_of_tendsto' {f : β → α} {a b : α} {x : filter β}
[ne_bot x] (lim : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (h : ∀ c, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto lim (eventually_of_forall h)
lemma ge_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {a b : α} {x : filter β} [ne_bot x]
(lim : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (h : ∀ᶠ c in x, b ≤ f c) : b ≤ a :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto tendsto_const_nhds lim h
lemma ge_of_tendsto' {f : β → α} {a b : α} {x : filter β} [ne_bot x]
(lim : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (h : ∀ c, b ≤ f c) : b ≤ a :=
ge_of_tendsto lim (eventually_of_forall h)
@[simp]
lemma closure_le_eq [topological_space β] {f g : β → α} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
closure {b | f b ≤ g b} = {b | f b ≤ g b} :=
(is_closed_le hf hg).closure_eq
lemma closure_lt_subset_le [topological_space β] {f g : β → α} (hf : continuous f)
(hg : continuous g) :
closure {b | f b < g b} ⊆ {b | f b ≤ g b} :=
by { rw [←closure_le_eq hf hg], exact closure_mono (λ b, le_of_lt) }
lemma continuous_within_at.closure_le [topological_space β]
{f g : β → α} {s : set β} {x : β} (hx : x ∈ closure s)
(hf : continuous_within_at f s x)
(hg : continuous_within_at g s x)
(h : ∀ y ∈ s, f y ≤ g y) : f x ≤ g x :=
show (f x, g x) ∈ {p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2},
from order_closed_topology.is_closed_le'.closure_subset ((hf.prod hg).mem_closure hx h)
/-- If `s` is a closed set and two functions `f` and `g` are continuous on `s`,
then the set `{x ∈ s | f x ≤ g x}` is a closed set. -/
lemma is_closed.is_closed_le [topological_space β] {f g : β → α} {s : set β} (hs : is_closed s)
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hg : continuous_on g s) :
is_closed {x ∈ s | f x ≤ g x} :=
(hf.prod hg).preimage_closed_of_closed hs order_closed_topology.is_closed_le'
omit t
lemma nhds_within_Ici_ne_bot {a b : α} (H₂ : a ≤ b) :
𝓝[Ici a] b ≠ ⊥ :=
nhds_within_ne_bot_of_mem H₂
lemma nhds_within_Ici_self_ne_bot (a : α) :
𝓝[Ici a] a ≠ ⊥ :=
nhds_within_Ici_ne_bot (le_refl a)
lemma nhds_within_Iic_ne_bot {a b : α} (H : a ≤ b) :
𝓝[Iic b] a ≠ ⊥ :=
nhds_within_ne_bot_of_mem H
lemma nhds_within_Iic_self_ne_bot (a : α) :
𝓝[Iic a] a ≠ ⊥ :=
nhds_within_Iic_ne_bot (le_refl a)
end preorder
section partial_order
variables [topological_space α] [partial_order α] [t : order_closed_topology α]
include t
private lemma is_closed_eq : is_closed {p : α × α | p.1 = p.2} :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff];
exact is_closed_inter t.is_closed_le' (is_closed_le continuous_snd continuous_fst)
@[priority 90] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance order_closed_topology.to_t2_space : t2_space α :=
{ t2 :=
have is_open {p : α × α | p.1 ≠ p.2}, from is_closed_eq,
assume a b h,
let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, ha, hb, h⟩ := is_open_prod_iff.mp this a b h in
⟨u, v, hu, hv, ha, hb,
set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ assume a ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
have a ≠ a, from @h (a, a) ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
this rfl⟩ }
end partial_order
section linear_order
variables [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [order_closed_topology α]
lemma is_open_lt [topological_space β] {f g : β → α} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
is_open {b | f b < g b} :=
by simp [lt_iff_not_ge, -not_le]; exact is_closed_le hg hf
variables {a b : α}
lemma is_open_Iio : is_open (Iio a) :=
is_open_lt continuous_id continuous_const
lemma is_open_Ioi : is_open (Ioi a) :=
is_open_lt continuous_const continuous_id
lemma is_open_Ioo : is_open (Ioo a b) :=
is_open_inter is_open_Ioi is_open_Iio
@[simp] lemma interior_Ioi : interior (Ioi a) = Ioi a :=
is_open_Ioi.interior_eq
@[simp] lemma interior_Iio : interior (Iio a) = Iio a :=
is_open_Iio.interior_eq
@[simp] lemma interior_Ioo : interior (Ioo a b) = Ioo a b :=
is_open_Ioo.interior_eq
/-- Intermediate value theorem for two functions: if `f` and `g` are two continuous functions
on a preconnected space and `f a ≤ g a` and `g b ≤ f b`, then for some `x` we have `f x = g x`. -/
lemma intermediate_value_univ₂ {γ : Type*} [topological_space γ] [preconnected_space γ] {a b : γ}
{f g : γ → α} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) (ha : f a ≤ g a) (hb : g b ≤ f b) :
∃ x, f x = g x :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, h, hfg, hgf⟩ : (univ ∩ {x | f x ≤ g x ∧ g x ≤ f x}).nonempty,
from is_preconnected_closed_iff.1 preconnected_space.is_preconnected_univ _ _
(is_closed_le hf hg) (is_closed_le hg hf) (λ x hx, le_total _ _) ⟨a, trivial, ha⟩
⟨b, trivial, hb⟩,
exact ⟨x, le_antisymm hfg hgf⟩
end
/-- Intermediate value theorem for two functions: if `f` and `g` are two functions continuous
on a preconnected set `s` and for some `a b ∈ s` we have `f a ≤ g a` and `g b ≤ f b`,
then for some `x ∈ s` we have `f x = g x`. -/
lemma is_preconnected.intermediate_value₂ {γ : Type*} [topological_space γ] {s : set γ}
(hs : is_preconnected s) {a b : γ} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) {f g : γ → α}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hg : continuous_on g s) (ha' : f a ≤ g a) (hb' : g b ≤ f b) :
∃ x ∈ s, f x = g x :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := @intermediate_value_univ₂ α _ _ _ s _ (subtype.preconnected_space hs) ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
_ _ (continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hf) (continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hg)
ha' hb'
in ⟨x, x.2, hx⟩
/-- Intermediate Value Theorem for continuous functions on connected sets. -/
lemma is_preconnected.intermediate_value {γ : Type*} [topological_space γ] {s : set γ}
(hs : is_preconnected s) {a b : γ} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) {f : γ → α}
(hf : continuous_on f s) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' s :=
λ x hx, mem_image_iff_bex.2 $ hs.intermediate_value₂ ha hb hf continuous_on_const hx.1 hx.2
/-- Intermediate Value Theorem for continuous functions on connected spaces. -/
lemma intermediate_value_univ {γ : Type*} [topological_space γ] [preconnected_space γ]
(a b : γ) {f : γ → α} (hf : continuous f) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ range f :=
λ x hx, intermediate_value_univ₂ hf continuous_const hx.1 hx.2
/-- If a preconnected set contains endpoints of an interval, then it includes the whole interval. -/
lemma is_preconnected.Icc_subset {s : set α} (hs : is_preconnected s)
{a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
Icc a b ⊆ s :=
by simpa only [image_id] using hs.intermediate_value ha hb continuous_on_id
/-- If a preconnected set contains endpoints of an interval, then it includes the whole interval. -/
lemma is_connected.Icc_subset {s : set α} (hs : is_connected s)
{a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
Icc a b ⊆ s :=
hs.2.Icc_subset ha hb
/-- If preconnected set in a linear order space is unbounded below and above, then it is the whole
space. -/
lemma is_preconnected.eq_univ_of_unbounded {s : set α} (hs : is_preconnected s) (hb : ¬bdd_below s)
(ha : ¬bdd_above s) :
s = univ :=
begin
refine eq_univ_of_forall (λ x, _),
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ s, y < x := not_bdd_below_iff.1 hb x,
obtain ⟨z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s, x < z := not_bdd_above_iff.1 ha x,
exact hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨le_of_lt hy, le_of_lt hz⟩
end
/-!
### Neighborhoods to the left and to the right on an `order_closed_topology`
Limits to the left and to the right of real functions are defined in terms of neighborhoods to
the left and to the right, either open or closed, i.e., members of `𝓝[Ioi a] a` and
`𝓝[Ici a] a` on the right, and similarly on the left. Here we simply prove that all
right-neighborhoods of a point are equal, and we'll prove later other useful characterizations which
require the stronger hypothesis `order_topology α` -/
/-!
#### Right neighborhoods, point excluded
-/
lemma Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ico a c) :
Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[Ioi b] b :=
mem_nhds_within.2 ⟨Iio c, is_open_Iio, H.2,
by rw [inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iio]; exact Ioo_subset_Ioo_left H.1⟩
lemma Ioc_mem_nhds_within_Ioi {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ico a c) :
Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[Ioi b] b :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
lemma Ico_mem_nhds_within_Ioi {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ico a c) :
Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[Ioi b] b :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
lemma Icc_mem_nhds_within_Ioi {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ico a c) :
Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[Ioi b] b :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi H) Ioo_subset_Icc_self
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Ioc_eq_nhds_within_Ioi {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
𝓝[Ioc a b] a = 𝓝[Ioi a] a :=
le_antisymm (nhds_within_mono _ Ioc_subset_Ioi_self) $
nhds_within_le_of_mem $ Ioc_mem_nhds_within_Ioi $ left_mem_Ico.2 h
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Ioo_eq_nhds_within_Ioi {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
𝓝[Ioo a b] a = 𝓝[Ioi a] a :=
le_antisymm (nhds_within_mono _ Ioo_subset_Ioi_self) $
nhds_within_le_of_mem $ Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi $ left_mem_Ico.2 h
@[simp]
lemma continuous_within_at_Ioc_iff_Ioi [topological_space β] {a b : α} {f : α → β} (h : a < b) :
continuous_within_at f (Ioc a b) a ↔ continuous_within_at f (Ioi a) a :=
by simp only [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_Ioc_eq_nhds_within_Ioi h]
@[simp]
lemma continuous_within_at_Ioo_iff_Ioi [topological_space β] {a b : α} {f : α → β} (h : a < b) :
continuous_within_at f (Ioo a b) a ↔ continuous_within_at f (Ioi a) a :=
by simp only [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_Ioo_eq_nhds_within_Ioi h]
/-!
#### Left neighborhoods, point excluded
-/
lemma Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Iio {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) :
Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[Iio b] b :=
by simpa only [dual_Ioo] using @Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ _ ⟨H.2, H.1⟩
lemma Ico_mem_nhds_within_Iio {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) :
Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[Iio b] b :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Iio H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
lemma Ioc_mem_nhds_within_Iio {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) :
Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[Iio b] b :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Iio H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
lemma Icc_mem_nhds_within_Iio {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) :
Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[Iio b] b :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Iio H) Ioo_subset_Icc_self
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Ico_eq_nhds_within_Iio {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
𝓝[Ico a b] b = 𝓝[Iio b] b :=
by simpa only [dual_Ioc] using @nhds_within_Ioc_eq_nhds_within_Ioi (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ h
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Ioo_eq_nhds_within_Iio {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
𝓝[Ioo a b] b = 𝓝[Iio b] b :=
by simpa only [dual_Ioo] using @nhds_within_Ioo_eq_nhds_within_Ioi (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ h
@[simp] lemma continuous_within_at_Ico_iff_Iio [topological_space β] {a b : α} {f : α → β} (h : a < b) :
continuous_within_at f (Ico a b) b ↔ continuous_within_at f (Iio b) b :=
by simp only [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_Ico_eq_nhds_within_Iio h]
@[simp] lemma continuous_within_at_Ioo_iff_Iio [topological_space β] {a b : α} {f : α → β} (h : a < b) :
continuous_within_at f (Ioo a b) b ↔ continuous_within_at f (Iio b) b :=
by simp only [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_Ioo_eq_nhds_within_Iio h]
/-!
#### Right neighborhoods, point included
-/
lemma Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ici {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) :
Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[Ici b] b :=
mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds $ mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioo H
lemma Ioc_mem_nhds_within_Ici {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) :
Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[Ici b] b :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ici H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
lemma Ico_mem_nhds_within_Ici {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ico a c) :
Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[Ici b] b :=
mem_nhds_within.2 ⟨Iio c, is_open_Iio, H.2,
by simp only [inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iio, Ico_subset_Ico_left H.1]⟩
lemma Icc_mem_nhds_within_Ici {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ico a c) :
Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[Ici b] b :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ico_mem_nhds_within_Ici H) Ico_subset_Icc_self
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Icc_eq_nhds_within_Ici {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
𝓝[Icc a b] a = 𝓝[Ici a] a :=
le_antisymm (nhds_within_mono _ Icc_subset_Ici_self) $
nhds_within_le_of_mem $ Icc_mem_nhds_within_Ici $ left_mem_Ico.2 h
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Ico_eq_nhds_within_Ici {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
𝓝[Ico a b] a = 𝓝[Ici a] a :=
le_antisymm (nhds_within_mono _ (λ x, and.left)) $
nhds_within_le_of_mem $ Ico_mem_nhds_within_Ici $ left_mem_Ico.2 h
@[simp]
lemma continuous_within_at_Icc_iff_Ici [topological_space β] {a b : α} {f : α → β} (h : a < b) :
continuous_within_at f (Icc a b) a ↔ continuous_within_at f (Ici a) a :=
by simp only [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_Icc_eq_nhds_within_Ici h]
@[simp]
lemma continuous_within_at_Ico_iff_Ici [topological_space β] {a b : α} {f : α → β} (h : a < b) :
continuous_within_at f (Ico a b) a ↔ continuous_within_at f (Ici a) a :=
by simp only [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_Ico_eq_nhds_within_Ici h]
/-!
#### Left neighborhoods, point included
-/
lemma Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Iic {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) :
Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[Iic b] b :=
mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds $ mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioo H
lemma Ico_mem_nhds_within_Iic {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) :
Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[Iic b] b :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Iic H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
lemma Ioc_mem_nhds_within_Iic {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) :
Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[Iic b] b :=
by simpa only [dual_Ico] using @Ico_mem_nhds_within_Ici (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ _ ⟨H.2, H.1⟩
lemma Icc_mem_nhds_within_Iic {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) :
Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[Iic b] b :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioc_mem_nhds_within_Iic H) Ioc_subset_Icc_self
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Icc_eq_nhds_within_Iic {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
𝓝[Icc a b] b = 𝓝[Iic b] b :=
by simpa only [dual_Icc] using @nhds_within_Icc_eq_nhds_within_Ici (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ h
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Ioc_eq_nhds_within_Iic {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
𝓝[Ioc a b] b = 𝓝[Iic b] b :=
by simpa only [dual_Ico] using @nhds_within_Ico_eq_nhds_within_Ici (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ h
@[simp]
lemma continuous_within_at_Icc_iff_Iic [topological_space β] {a b : α} {f : α → β} (h : a < b) :
continuous_within_at f (Icc a b) b ↔ continuous_within_at f (Iic b) b :=
by simp only [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_Icc_eq_nhds_within_Iic h]
@[simp]
lemma continuous_within_at_Ioc_iff_Iic [topological_space β] {a b : α} {f : α → β} (h : a < b) :
continuous_within_at f (Ioc a b) b ↔ continuous_within_at f (Iic b) b :=
by simp only [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_Ioc_eq_nhds_within_Iic h]
end linear_order
section decidable_linear_order
variables [topological_space α] [decidable_linear_order α] [order_closed_topology α] {f g : β → α}
section
variables [topological_space β] (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g)
include hf hg
lemma frontier_le_subset_eq : frontier {b | f b ≤ g b} ⊆ {b | f b = g b} :=
begin
rw [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, closure_le_eq hf hg],
rintros b ⟨hb₁, hb₂⟩,
refine le_antisymm hb₁ (closure_lt_subset_le hg hf _),
convert hb₂ using 2, simp only [not_le.symm], refl
end
lemma frontier_lt_subset_eq : frontier {b | f b < g b} ⊆ {b | f b = g b} :=
by rw ← frontier_compl;
convert frontier_le_subset_eq hg hf; simp [ext_iff, eq_comm]
@[continuity] lemma continuous.min : continuous (λb, min (f b) (g b)) :=
have ∀b∈frontier {b | f b ≤ g b}, f b = g b, from assume b hb, frontier_le_subset_eq hf hg hb,
continuous_if this hf hg
@[continuity] lemma continuous.max : continuous (λb, max (f b) (g b)) :=
@continuous.min (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf hg
end
lemma tendsto.max {b : filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} (hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) :
tendsto (λb, max (f b) (g b)) b (𝓝 (max a₁ a₂)) :=
show tendsto ((λp:α×α, max p.1 p.2) ∘ (λb, (f b, g b))) b (𝓝 (max a₁ a₂)),
from tendsto.comp
begin
rw [←nhds_prod_eq],
from continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp (continuous_fst.max continuous_snd) _
end
(hf.prod_mk hg)
lemma tendsto.min {b : filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} (hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) :
tendsto (λb, min (f b) (g b)) b (𝓝 (min a₁ a₂)) :=
show tendsto ((λp:α×α, min p.1 p.2) ∘ (λb, (f b, g b))) b (𝓝 (min a₁ a₂)),
from tendsto.comp
begin
rw [←nhds_prod_eq],
from continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp (continuous_fst.min continuous_snd) _
end
(hf.prod_mk hg)
end decidable_linear_order
end order_closed_topology
/-- The order topology on an ordered type is the topology generated by open intervals. We register
it on a preorder, but it is mostly interesting in linear orders, where it is also order-closed.
We define it as a mixin. If you want to introduce the order topology on a preorder, use
`preorder.topology`. -/
class order_topology (α : Type*) [t : topological_space α] [preorder α] : Prop :=
(topology_eq_generate_intervals : t = generate_from {s | ∃a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a})
/-- (Order) topology on a partial order `α` generated by the subbase of open intervals
`(a, ∞) = { x ∣ a < x }, (-∞ , b) = {x ∣ x < b}` for all `a, b` in `α`. We do not register it as an
instance as many ordered sets are already endowed with the same topology, most often in a non-defeq
way though. Register as a local instance when necessary. -/
def preorder.topology (α : Type*) [preorder α] : topological_space α :=
generate_from {s : set α | ∃ (a : α), s = {b : α | a < b} ∨ s = {b : α | b < a}}
section order_topology
instance {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [partial_order α] [order_topology α] :
order_topology (order_dual α) :=
⟨by convert @order_topology.topology_eq_generate_intervals α _ _ _;
conv in (_ ∨ _) { rw or.comm }; refl⟩
section partial_order
variables [topological_space α] [partial_order α] [t : order_topology α]
include t
lemma is_open_iff_generate_intervals {s : set α} :
is_open s ↔ generate_open {s | ∃a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a} s :=
by rw [t.topology_eq_generate_intervals]; refl
lemma is_open_lt' (a : α) : is_open {b:α | a < b} :=
by rw [@is_open_iff_generate_intervals α _ _ t]; exact generate_open.basic _ ⟨a, or.inl rfl⟩
lemma is_open_gt' (a : α) : is_open {b:α | b < a} :=
by rw [@is_open_iff_generate_intervals α _ _ t]; exact generate_open.basic _ ⟨a, or.inr rfl⟩
lemma lt_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, a < x :=
mem_nhds_sets (is_open_lt' _) h
lemma le_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, a ≤ x :=
(𝓝 b).sets_of_superset (lt_mem_nhds h) $ assume b hb, le_of_lt hb
lemma gt_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x < b :=
mem_nhds_sets (is_open_gt' _) h
lemma ge_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ≤ b :=
(𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (gt_mem_nhds h) $ assume b hb, le_of_lt hb
lemma nhds_eq_order (a : α) :
𝓝 a = (⨅b ∈ Iio a, 𝓟 (Ioi b)) ⊓ (⨅b ∈ Ioi a, 𝓟 (Iio b)) :=
by rw [t.topology_eq_generate_intervals, nhds_generate_from];
from le_antisymm
(le_inf
(le_infi $ assume b, le_infi $ assume hb,
infi_le_of_le {c : α | b < c} $ infi_le _ ⟨hb, b, or.inl rfl⟩)
(le_infi $ assume b, le_infi $ assume hb,
infi_le_of_le {c : α | c < b} $ infi_le _ ⟨hb, b, or.inr rfl⟩))
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume ⟨ha, b, hs⟩,
match s, ha, hs with
| _, h, (or.inl rfl) := inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ h
| _, h, (or.inr rfl) := inf_le_right_of_le $ infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ h
end)
lemma tendsto_order {f : β → α} {a : α} {x : filter β} :
tendsto f x (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ a' < a, ∀ᶠ b in x, a' < f b) ∧ (∀ a' > a, ∀ᶠ b in x, f b < a') :=
by simp [nhds_eq_order a, tendsto_inf, tendsto_infi, tendsto_principal]
instance tendsto_Icc_class_nhds (a : α) : tendsto_Ixx_class Icc (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) :=
begin
simp only [nhds_eq_order, infi_subtype'],
refine ((has_basis_infi_principal_finite _).inf
(has_basis_infi_principal_finite _)).tendsto_Ixx_class (λ s hs, _),
refine (ord_connected_bInter _).inter (ord_connected_bInter _); intros _ _,
exacts [ord_connected_Ioi, ord_connected_Iio]
end
instance tendsto_Ico_class_nhds (a : α) : tendsto_Ixx_class Ico (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) :=
tendsto_Ixx_class_of_subset (λ _ _, Ico_subset_Icc_self)
instance tendsto_Ioc_class_nhds (a : α) : tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) :=
tendsto_Ixx_class_of_subset (λ _ _, Ioc_subset_Icc_self)
instance tendsto_Ioo_class_nhds (a : α) : tendsto_Ixx_class Ioo (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) :=
tendsto_Ixx_class_of_subset (λ _ _, Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
instance tendsto_Ixx_nhds_within (a : α) {s t : set α} {Ixx}
[tendsto_Ixx_class Ixx (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a)] [tendsto_Ixx_class Ixx (𝓟 s) (𝓟 t)]:
tendsto_Ixx_class Ixx (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] a) :=
filter.tendsto_Ixx_class_inf
/-- Also known as squeeze or sandwich theorem. This version assumes that inequalities hold
eventually for the filter. -/
lemma tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' {f g h : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α}
(hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a)) (hh : tendsto h b (𝓝 a))
(hgf : ∀ᶠ b in b, g b ≤ f b) (hfh : ∀ᶠ b in b, f b ≤ h b) :
tendsto f b (𝓝 a) :=
tendsto_order.2
⟨assume a' h',
have ∀ᶠ b in b, a' < g b, from (tendsto_order.1 hg).left a' h',
by filter_upwards [this, hgf] assume a, lt_of_lt_of_le,
assume a' h',
have ∀ᶠ b in b, h b < a', from (tendsto_order.1 hh).right a' h',
by filter_upwards [this, hfh] assume a h₁ h₂, lt_of_le_of_lt h₂ h₁⟩
/-- Also known as squeeze or sandwich theorem. This version assumes that inequalities hold
everywhere. -/
lemma tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le {f g h : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α}
(hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a)) (hh : tendsto h b (𝓝 a)) (hgf : g ≤ f) (hfh : f ≤ h) :
tendsto f b (𝓝 a) :=
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' hg hh
(eventually_of_forall hgf) (eventually_of_forall hfh)
lemma nhds_order_unbounded {a : α} (hu : ∃u, a < u) (hl : ∃l, l < a) :
𝓝 a = (⨅l (h₂ : l < a) u (h₂ : a < u), 𝓟 (Ioo l u)) :=
calc 𝓝 a = (⨅b<a, 𝓟 {c | b < c}) ⊓ (⨅b>a, 𝓟 {c | c < b}) : nhds_eq_order a
... = (⨅b<a, 𝓟 {c | b < c} ⊓ (⨅b>a, 𝓟 {c | c < b})) : binfi_inf hl
... = (⨅l<a, (⨅u>a, 𝓟 {c | c < u} ⊓ 𝓟 {c | l < c})) :
begin
congr, funext x,
congr, funext hx,
rw [inf_comm],
apply binfi_inf hu
end
... = _ : by simp [inter_comm]; refl
lemma tendsto_order_unbounded {f : β → α} {a : α} {x : filter β}
(hu : ∃u, a < u) (hl : ∃l, l < a) (h : ∀l u, l < a → a < u → ∀ᶠ b in x, l < f b ∧ f b < u) :
tendsto f x (𝓝 a) :=
by rw [nhds_order_unbounded hu hl];
from (tendsto_infi.2 $ assume l, tendsto_infi.2 $ assume hl,
tendsto_infi.2 $ assume u, tendsto_infi.2 $ assume hu, tendsto_principal.2 $ h l u hl hu)
end partial_order
theorem induced_order_topology' {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
[partial_order α] [ta : topological_space β] [partial_order β] [order_topology β]
(f : α → β) (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y)
(H₁ : ∀ {a x}, x < f a → ∃ b < a, x ≤ f b)
(H₂ : ∀ {a x}, f a < x → ∃ b > a, f b ≤ x) :
@order_topology _ (induced f ta) _ :=
begin
letI := induced f ta,
refine ⟨eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds (λ a, _)⟩,
rw [nhds_induced, nhds_generate_from, nhds_eq_order (f a)],
apply le_antisymm,
{ refine le_infi (λ s, le_infi $ λ hs, le_principal_iff.2 _),
rcases hs with ⟨ab, b, rfl|rfl⟩,
{ exact mem_comap_sets.2 ⟨{x | f b < x},
mem_inf_sets_of_left $ mem_infi_sets _ $ mem_infi_sets (hf.2 ab) $ mem_principal_self _,
λ x, hf.1⟩ },
{ exact mem_comap_sets.2 ⟨{x | x < f b},
mem_inf_sets_of_right $ mem_infi_sets _ $ mem_infi_sets (hf.2 ab) $ mem_principal_self _,
λ x, hf.1⟩ } },
{ rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap],
refine le_inf _ _; refine le_infi (λ x, le_infi $ λ h, le_principal_iff.2 _); simp,
{ rcases H₁ h with ⟨b, ab, xb⟩,
refine mem_infi_sets _ (mem_infi_sets ⟨ab, b, or.inl rfl⟩ (mem_principal_sets.2 _)),
exact λ c hc, lt_of_le_of_lt xb (hf.2 hc) },
{ rcases H₂ h with ⟨b, ab, xb⟩,
refine mem_infi_sets _ (mem_infi_sets ⟨ab, b, or.inr rfl⟩ (mem_principal_sets.2 _)),
exact λ c hc, lt_of_lt_of_le (hf.2 hc) xb } },
end
theorem induced_order_topology {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
[partial_order α] [ta : topological_space β] [partial_order β] [order_topology β]
(f : α → β) (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y)
(H : ∀ {x y}, x < y → ∃ a, x < f a ∧ f a < y) :
@order_topology _ (induced f ta) _ :=
induced_order_topology' f @hf
(λ a x xa, let ⟨b, xb, ba⟩ := H xa in ⟨b, hf.1 ba, le_of_lt xb⟩)
(λ a x ax, let ⟨b, ab, bx⟩ := H ax in ⟨b, hf.1 ab, le_of_lt bx⟩)
lemma nhds_top_order [topological_space α] [order_top α] [order_topology α] :
𝓝 (⊤:α) = (⨅l (h₂ : l < ⊤), 𝓟 (Ioi l)) :=
by simp [nhds_eq_order (⊤:α)]
lemma nhds_bot_order [topological_space α] [order_bot α] [order_topology α] :
𝓝 (⊥:α) = (⨅l (h₂ : ⊥ < l), 𝓟 (Iio l)) :=
by simp [nhds_eq_order (⊥:α)]
section linear_order
variables [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [order_topology α]
lemma exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds' {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) {l : α} (hl : l < a) :
∃ l' ∈ Ico l a, Ioc l' a ⊆ s :=
begin
rw [nhds_eq_order a] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, hts⟩,
-- First we show that `t₂` includes `(-∞, a]`, so it suffices to show `(l', ∞) ⊆ t₁`
suffices : ∃ l' ∈ Ico l a, Ioi l' ⊆ t₁,
{ have A : 𝓟 (Iic a) ≤ ⨅ b ∈ Ioi a, 𝓟 (Iio b),
from (le_infi $ λ b, le_infi $ λ hb, principal_mono.2 $ Iic_subset_Iio.2 hb),
have B : t₁ ∩ Iic a ⊆ s,
from subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_right _ (A ht₂)) hts,
from this.imp (λ l', Exists.imp $ λ hl' hl x hx, B ⟨hl hx.1, hx.2⟩) },
clear hts ht₂ t₂,
-- Now we find `l` such that `(l', ∞) ⊆ t₁`
letI := classical.DLO α,
rw [mem_binfi] at ht₁,
{ rcases ht₁ with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩,
exact ⟨max b l, ⟨le_max_right _ _, max_lt hb hl⟩,
λ x hx, hb' $ Ioi_subset_Ioi (le_max_left _ _) hx⟩ },
{ intros b hb b' hb', simp only [mem_Iio] at hb hb',
use [max b b', max_lt hb hb'],
simp [le_refl] },
exact ⟨l, hl⟩
end
lemma exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) {u : α} (hu : a < u) :
∃ u' ∈ Ioc a u, Ico a u' ⊆ s :=
begin
convert @exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds' (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ hs _ hu,
ext, rw [dual_Ico, dual_Ioc]
end
lemma exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h : ∃ l, l < a) :
∃ l < a, Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
let ⟨l', hl'⟩ := h in let ⟨l, hl⟩ := exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds' hs hl' in ⟨l, hl.fst.2, hl.snd⟩
lemma exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h : ∃ u, a < u) :
∃ u (_ : a < u), Ico a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨l', hl'⟩ := h in let ⟨l, hl⟩ := exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' hs hl' in ⟨l, hl.fst.1, hl.snd⟩
lemma mem_nhds_unbounded {a : α} {s : set α} (hu : ∃u, a < u) (hl : ∃l, l < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (∃l u, l < a ∧ a < u ∧ ∀b, l < b → b < u → b ∈ s) :=
let ⟨l, hl'⟩ := hl, ⟨u, hu'⟩ := hu in
have 𝓝 a = (⨅p : {l // l < a} × {u // a < u}, 𝓟 (Ioo p.1.val p.2.val)),
by simp [nhds_order_unbounded hu hl, infi_subtype, infi_prod],
iff.intro
(assume hs, by rw [this] at hs; from infi_sets_induct hs
⟨l, u, hl', hu', by simp⟩
begin
intro p, rcases p with ⟨⟨l, hl⟩, ⟨u, hu⟩⟩,
simp [set.subset_def],
intros s₁ s₂ hs₁ l' hl' u' hu' hs₂,
letI := classical.DLO α,
refine ⟨max l l', _, min u u', _⟩;
simp [*, lt_min_iff, max_lt_iff] {contextual := tt}
end
(assume s₁ s₂ h ⟨l, u, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩, ⟨l, u, h₁, h₂, assume b hu hl, h $ h₃ _ hu hl⟩))
(assume ⟨l, u, hl, hu, h⟩,
by rw [this]; exact mem_infi_sets ⟨⟨l, hl⟩, ⟨u, hu⟩⟩ (assume b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h b h₁ h₂))
lemma order_separated {a₁ a₂ : α} (h : a₁ < a₂) :
∃u v : set α, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ a₁ ∈ u ∧ a₂ ∈ v ∧ (∀b₁∈u, ∀b₂∈v, b₁ < b₂) :=
match dense_or_discrete a₁ a₂ with
| or.inl ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := ⟨{a' | a' < a}, {a' | a < a'}, is_open_gt' a, is_open_lt' a, ha₁, ha₂,
assume b₁ h₁ b₂ h₂, lt_trans h₁ h₂⟩
| or.inr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := ⟨{a | a < a₂}, {a | a₁ < a}, is_open_gt' a₂, is_open_lt' a₁, h, h,
assume b₁ hb₁ b₂ hb₂,
calc b₁ ≤ a₁ : h₂ _ hb₁
... < a₂ : h
... ≤ b₂ : h₁ _ hb₂⟩
end
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance order_topology.to_order_closed_topology : order_closed_topology α :=
{ is_closed_le' :=
is_open_prod_iff.mpr $ assume a₁ a₂ (h : ¬ a₁ ≤ a₂),
have h : a₂ < a₁, from lt_of_not_ge h,
let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, ha₁, ha₂, h⟩ := order_separated h in
⟨v, u, hv, hu, ha₂, ha₁, assume ⟨b₁, b₂⟩ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, not_le_of_gt $ h b₂ h₂ b₁ h₁⟩ }
lemma order_topology.t2_space : t2_space α := by apply_instance
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance order_topology.regular_space : regular_space α :=
{ regular := assume s a hs ha,
have hs' : sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 a, from mem_nhds_sets hs ha,
have ∃t:set α, is_open t ∧ (∀l∈ s, l < a → l ∈ t) ∧ 𝓝[t] a = ⊥,
from by_cases
(assume h : ∃l, l < a,
let ⟨l, hl, h⟩ := exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds hs' h in
match dense_or_discrete l a with
| or.inl ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := ⟨{a | a < b}, is_open_gt' _,
assume c hcs hca, show c < b,
from lt_of_not_ge $ assume hbc, h ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le hb₁ hbc, le_of_lt hca⟩ hcs,
inf_principal_eq_bot $ (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (mem_nhds_sets (is_open_lt' _) hb₂) $
assume x (hx : b < x), show ¬ x < b, from not_lt.2 $ le_of_lt hx⟩
| or.inr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := ⟨{a' | a' < a}, is_open_gt' _, assume b hbs hba, hba,
inf_principal_eq_bot $ (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (mem_nhds_sets (is_open_lt' _) hl) $
assume x (hx : l < x), show ¬ x < a, from not_lt.2 $ h₁ _ hx⟩
end)
(assume : ¬ ∃l, l < a, ⟨∅, is_open_empty, assume l _ hl, (this ⟨l, hl⟩).elim,
nhds_within_empty _⟩),
let ⟨t₁, ht₁o, ht₁s, ht₁a⟩ := this in
have ∃t:set α, is_open t ∧ (∀u∈ s, u>a → u ∈ t) ∧ 𝓝[t] a = ⊥,
from by_cases
(assume h : ∃u, u > a,
let ⟨u, hu, h⟩ := exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds hs' h in
match dense_or_discrete a u with
| or.inl ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := ⟨{a | b < a}, is_open_lt' _,
assume c hcs hca, show c > b,
from lt_of_not_ge $ assume hbc, h ⟨le_of_lt hca, lt_of_le_of_lt hbc hb₂⟩ hcs,
inf_principal_eq_bot $ (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (mem_nhds_sets (is_open_gt' _) hb₁) $
assume x (hx : b > x), show ¬ x > b, from not_lt.2 $ le_of_lt hx⟩
| or.inr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := ⟨{a' | a' > a}, is_open_lt' _, assume b hbs hba, hba,
inf_principal_eq_bot $ (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (mem_nhds_sets (is_open_gt' _) hu) $
assume x (hx : u > x), show ¬ x > a, from not_lt.2 $ h₂ _ hx⟩
end)
(assume : ¬ ∃u, u > a, ⟨∅, is_open_empty, assume l _ hl, (this ⟨l, hl⟩).elim,
nhds_within_empty _⟩),
let ⟨t₂, ht₂o, ht₂s, ht₂a⟩ := this in
⟨t₁ ∪ t₂, is_open_union ht₁o ht₂o,
assume x hx,
have x ≠ a, from assume eq, ha $ eq ▸ hx,
(ne_iff_lt_or_gt.mp this).imp (ht₁s _ hx) (ht₂s _ hx),
by rw [nhds_within_union, ht₁a, ht₂a, bot_sup_eq]⟩,
..order_topology.t2_space }
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, u)` containing `a`,
provided `a` is neither a bottom element nor a top element. -/
lemma mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' {a l' u' : α} {s : set α}
(hl' : l' < a) (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃l u, a ∈ Ioo l u ∧ Ioo l u ⊆ s :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' h hu' with ⟨u, au, hu⟩,
rcases exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds' h hl' with ⟨l, la, hl⟩,
refine ⟨l, u, ⟨la.2, au.1⟩, λx hx, _⟩,
cases le_total a x with hax hax,
{ exact hu ⟨hax, hx.2⟩ },
{ exact hl ⟨hx.1, hax⟩ } },
{ rintros ⟨l, u, ha, h⟩,
apply mem_sets_of_superset (mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioo ha) h }
end
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, u)` containing `a`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [no_top_order α] [no_bot_order α] {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃l u, a ∈ Ioo l u ∧ Ioo l u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨l', hl'⟩ := no_bot a in let ⟨u', hu'⟩ := no_top a in mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' hl' hu'
lemma Iio_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : Iio b ∈ 𝓝 a :=
mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio h
lemma Ioi_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : Ioi a ∈ 𝓝 b :=
mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioi h
lemma Ioo_mem_nhds {a b x : α} (ha : a < x) (hb : x < b) : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioo ⟨ha, hb⟩
lemma disjoint_nhds_at_top [no_top_order α] (x : α) :
disjoint (𝓝 x) at_top :=
begin
rw filter.disjoint_iff,
cases no_top x with a ha,
use [Iio a, Ici a, Iio_mem_nhds ha, mem_at_top a],
rw [inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iio, Ico_self]
end
@[simp] lemma inf_nhds_at_top [no_top_order α] (x : α) :
𝓝 x ⊓ at_top = ⊥ :=
disjoint_iff.1 (disjoint_nhds_at_top x)
lemma disjoint_nhds_at_bot [no_bot_order α] (x : α) :
disjoint (𝓝 x) at_bot :=
@disjoint_nhds_at_top (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ x
@[simp] lemma inf_nhds_at_bot [no_bot_order α] (x : α) :
𝓝 x ⊓ at_bot = ⊥ :=
@inf_nhds_at_top (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ x
lemma not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_at_top [no_top_order α]
{F : filter β} [ne_bot F] {f : β → α} (hf : tendsto f F at_top) (x : α) :
¬ tendsto f F (𝓝 x) :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_at_top x).symm
lemma not_tendsto_at_top_of_tendsto_nhds [no_top_order α]
{F : filter β} [ne_bot F] {f : β → α} {x : α} (hf : tendsto f F (𝓝 x)) :
¬ tendsto f F at_top :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_at_top x)
lemma not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_at_bot [no_bot_order α]
{F : filter β} [ne_bot F] {f : β → α} (hf : tendsto f F at_bot) (x : α) :
¬ tendsto f F (𝓝 x) :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_at_bot x).symm
lemma not_tendsto_at_bot_of_tendsto_nhds [no_bot_order α]
{F : filter β} [ne_bot F] {f : β → α} {x : α} (hf : tendsto f F (𝓝 x)) :
¬ tendsto f F at_bot :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_at_bot x)
/-!
### Neighborhoods to the left and to the right on an `order_topology`
We've seen some properties of left and right neighborhood of a point in an `order_closed_topology`.
In an `order_topology`, such neighborhoods can be characterized as the sets containing suitable
intervals to the right or to the left of `a`. We give now these characterizations. -/
-- NB: If you extend the list, append to the end please to avoid breaking the API
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)`
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b]`
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b)`
3. `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u ∈ (a, b]`
4. `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u > a` -/
lemma tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ioi {a b : α} (hab : a < b) (s : set α) :
tfae [s ∈ 𝓝[Ioi a] a, -- 0 : `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioc a b] a, -- 1 : `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b]`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioo a b] a, -- 2 : `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b)`
∃ u ∈ Ioc a b, Ioo a u ⊆ s, -- 3 : `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u ∈ (a, b]`
∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s] := -- 4 : `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u > a`
begin
tfae_have : 1 ↔ 2, by rw [nhds_within_Ioc_eq_nhds_within_Ioi hab],
tfae_have : 1 ↔ 3, by rw [nhds_within_Ioo_eq_nhds_within_Ioi hab],
tfae_have : 4 → 5, from λ ⟨u, umem, hu⟩, ⟨u, umem.1, hu⟩,
tfae_have : 5 → 1,
{ rintros ⟨u, hau, hu⟩,
exact mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi ⟨le_refl a, hau⟩) hu },
tfae_have : 1 → 4,
{ assume h,
rcases mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 h with ⟨v, va, hv⟩,
rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' va hab with ⟨u, au, hu⟩,
refine ⟨u, au, λx hx, _⟩,
refine hv ⟨hu ⟨le_of_lt hx.1, hx.2⟩, _⟩,
exact hx.1 },
tfae_finish
end
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ioo_subset {a u' : α} {s : set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioi a] a ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioc a u', Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ioi hu' s).out 0 3
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u)`
with `a < u < u'`, provided `a` is not a top element. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' {a u' : α} {s : set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioi a] a ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ioi hu' s).out 0 4
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u)`
with `a < u`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [no_top_order α] {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioi a] a ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨u', hu'⟩ := no_top a in mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' hu'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u]`
with `a < u`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioc_subset [no_top_order α] [densely_ordered α]
{a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[Ioi a] a ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioi a, Ioc a u ⊆ s :=
begin
rw mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset,
split,
{ rintros ⟨u, au, as⟩,
rcases dense au with ⟨v, hv⟩,
exact ⟨v, hv.1, λx hx, as ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 hv.2⟩⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨u, au, as⟩,
exact ⟨u, au, subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ioc_self as⟩ }
end
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b)`
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b)`
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b)`
3. `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
4. `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l < b` -/
lemma tfae_mem_nhds_within_Iio {a b : α} (h : a < b) (s : set α) :
tfae [s ∈ 𝓝[Iio b] b, -- 0 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b)`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ico a b] b, -- 1 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b)`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioo a b] b, -- 2 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Ico a b, Ioo l b ⊆ s, -- 3 : `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Iio b, Ioo l b ⊆ s] := -- 4 : `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l < b`
begin
have := @tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ioi (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ h s,
-- If we call `convert` here, it generates wrong equations, so we need to simplify first
simp only [exists_prop] at this ⊢,
rw [dual_Ioi, dual_Ioc, dual_Ioo] at this,
convert this; ext l; rw [dual_Ioo]
end
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iio_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset {a l' : α} {s : set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[Iio a] a ↔ ∃l ∈ Ico l' a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Iio hl' s).out 0 3
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a)`
with `l < a`, provided `a` is not a bottom element. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iio_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' {a l' : α} {s : set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[Iio a] a ↔ ∃l ∈ Iio a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Iio hl' s).out 0 4
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a)`
with `l < a`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iio_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [no_bot_order α] {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[Iio a] a ↔ ∃l ∈ Iio a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
let ⟨l', hl'⟩ := no_bot a in mem_nhds_within_Iio_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' hl'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `[l, a)`
with `l < a`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iio_iff_exists_Ico_subset [no_bot_order α] [densely_ordered α]
{a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[Iio a] a ↔ ∃l ∈ Iio a, Ico l a ⊆ s :=
begin
convert @mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioc_subset (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ _ _,
simp only [dual_Ioc], refl
end
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)`
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, b]`
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, b)`
3. `s` includes `[a, u)` for some `u ∈ (a, b]`
4. `s` includes `[a, u)` for some `u > a` -/
lemma tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ici {a b : α} (hab : a < b) (s : set α) :
tfae [s ∈ 𝓝[Ici a] a, -- 0 : `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)`
s ∈ 𝓝[Icc a b] a, -- 1 : `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, b]`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ico a b] a, -- 2 : `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, b)`
∃ u ∈ Ioc a b, Ico a u ⊆ s, -- 3 : `s` includes `[a, u)` for some `u ∈ (a, b]`
∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ico a u ⊆ s] := -- 4 : `s` includes `[a, u)` for some `u > a`
begin
tfae_have : 1 ↔ 2, by rw [nhds_within_Icc_eq_nhds_within_Ici hab],
tfae_have : 1 ↔ 3, by rw [nhds_within_Ico_eq_nhds_within_Ici hab],
tfae_have : 4 → 5, from λ ⟨u, umem, hu⟩, ⟨u, umem.1, hu⟩,
tfae_have : 5 → 1,
{ rintros ⟨u, hau, hu⟩,
exact mem_sets_of_superset (Ico_mem_nhds_within_Ici ⟨le_refl a, hau⟩) hu },
tfae_have : 1 → 4,
{ assume h,
rcases mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 h with ⟨v, va, hv⟩,
rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' va hab with ⟨u, au, hu⟩,
refine ⟨u, au, λx hx, _⟩,
refine hv ⟨hu ⟨hx.1, hx.2⟩, _⟩,
exact hx.1 },
tfae_finish
end
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ico_subset {a u' : α} {s : set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[Ici a] a ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioc a u', Ico a u ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ici hu' s).out 0 3 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u)`
with `a < u < u'`, provided `a` is not a top element. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset' {a u' : α} {s : set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[Ici a] a ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioi a, Ico a u ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ici hu' s).out 0 4 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u)`
with `a < u`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset [no_top_order α] {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[Ici a] a ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioi a, Ico a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨u', hu'⟩ := no_top a in mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset' hu'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u]`
with `a < u`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Icc_subset' [no_top_order α] [densely_ordered α]
{a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[Ici a] a ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioi a, Icc a u ⊆ s :=
begin
rw mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset,
split,
{ rintros ⟨u, au, as⟩,
rcases dense au with ⟨v, hv⟩,
exact ⟨v, hv.1, λx hx, as ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 hv.2⟩⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨u, au, as⟩,
exact ⟨u, au, subset.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self as⟩ }
end
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b]`
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b]`
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b]`
3. `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
4. `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l < b` -/
lemma tfae_mem_nhds_within_Iic {a b : α} (h : a < b) (s : set α) :
tfae [s ∈ 𝓝[Iic b] b, -- 0 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b]`
s ∈ 𝓝[Icc a b] b, -- 1 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b]`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioc a b] b, -- 2 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b]`
∃ l ∈ Ico a b, Ioc l b ⊆ s, -- 3 : `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Iio b, Ioc l b ⊆ s] := -- 4 : `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l < b`
begin
have := @tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ici (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ h s,
-- If we call `convert` here, it generates wrong equations, so we need to simplify first
simp only [exists_prop] at this ⊢,
rw [dual_Icc, dual_Ioc, dual_Ioi] at this,
convert this; ext l; rw [dual_Ico]
end
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioc_subset {a l' : α} {s : set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[Iic a] a ↔ ∃l ∈ Ico l' a, Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Iic hl' s).out 0 3 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a]`
with `l < a`, provided `a` is not a bottom element. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset' {a l' : α} {s : set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[Iic a] a ↔ ∃l ∈ Iio a, Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Iic hl' s).out 0 4 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a]`
with `l < a`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset [no_bot_order α] {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[Iic a] a ↔ ∃l ∈ Iio a, Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
let ⟨l', hl'⟩ := no_bot a in mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset' hl'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `[l, a]`
with `l < a`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_Icc_subset' [no_bot_order α] [densely_ordered α]
{a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[Iic a] a ↔ ∃l ∈ Iio a, Icc l a ⊆ s :=
begin
convert @mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Icc_subset' (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ _ _,
simp_rw (show ∀ u : order_dual α, @Icc (order_dual α) _ a u = @Icc α _ u a, from λ u, dual_Icc),
refl,
end
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u]`
with `a < u`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Icc_subset [no_top_order α] [densely_ordered α]
{a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[Ici a] a ↔ ∃u, a < u ∧ Icc a u ⊆ s :=
begin
rw mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset,
split,
{ rintros ⟨u, au, as⟩,
rcases dense au with ⟨v, hv⟩,
exact ⟨v, hv.1, λx hx, as ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 hv.2⟩⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨u, au, as⟩,
exact ⟨u, au, subset.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self as⟩ }
end
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `[l, a]`
with `l < a`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_Icc_subset [no_bot_order α] [densely_ordered α]
{a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[Iic a] a ↔ ∃l, l < a ∧ Icc l a ⊆ s :=
begin
rw mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset,
split,
{ rintros ⟨l, la, as⟩,
rcases dense la with ⟨v, hv⟩,
refine ⟨v, hv.2, λx hx, as ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le hv.1 hx.1, hx.2⟩⟩, },
{ rintros ⟨l, la, as⟩,
exact ⟨l, la, subset.trans Ioc_subset_Icc_self as⟩ }
end
section functions
variables [topological_space β] [linear_order β] [order_topology β]
/-- If `f : α → β` is strictly monotone and surjective, it is everywhere right-continuous. Superseded
later in this file by `continuous_of_strict_mono_surjective` (same assumptions). -/
lemma continuous_right_of_strict_mono_surjective
{f : α → β} (h_mono : strict_mono f) (h_surj : function.surjective f) (a : α) :
continuous_within_at f (Ici a) a :=
begin
have ha : a ∈ Ici a := left_mem_Ici,
intros s hs,
by_cases hfa_top : ∃ p, f a < p,
{ obtain ⟨q, hq, hqs⟩ : ∃ q ∈ Ioi (f a), Ico (f a) q ⊆ s :=
exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds hs hfa_top,
refine mem_sets_of_superset (mem_map.2 _) hqs,
have h_surj_on := surj_on_Ici_of_monotone_surjective h_mono.monotone h_surj a,
rcases h_surj_on (Ioi_subset_Ici_self hq) with ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hx with rfl|hax, { exact (lt_irrefl _ hq).elim },
refine mem_sets_of_superset (Ico_mem_nhds_within_Ici (left_mem_Ico.2 hax)) _,
intros z hz,
exact ⟨h_mono.monotone hz.1, h_mono hz.2⟩ },
{ push_neg at hfa_top,
have ha_top : ∀ x : α, x ≤ a := strict_mono.top_preimage_top h_mono hfa_top,
rw [Ici_singleton_of_top ha_top, nhds_within_eq_map_subtype_coe (mem_singleton a),
nhds_discrete {x : α // x ∈ {a}}],
{ exact mem_pure_sets.mpr (mem_of_nhds hs) },
{ apply_instance } }
end
/-- If `f : α → β` is strictly monotone and surjective, it is everywhere left-continuous. Superseded
later in this file by `continuous_of_strict_mono_surjective` (same assumptions). -/
lemma continuous_left_of_strict_mono_surjective
{f : α → β} (h_mono : strict_mono f) (h_surj : function.surjective f) (a : α) :
continuous_within_at f (Iic a) a :=
begin
apply @continuous_right_of_strict_mono_surjective (order_dual α) (order_dual β),
{ exact λ x y hxy, h_mono hxy },
{ simpa only [dual_Icc] }
end
end functions
end linear_order
section linear_ordered_ring
variables [topological_space α] [linear_ordered_ring α] [order_topology α]
variables {l : filter β} {f g : β → α}
/- TODO The theorems in this section ought to be written in the context of linearly ordered
(additive) commutative groups rather than linearly ordered rings; however, the former concept does
not currently exist in mathlib. -/
/-- In a linearly ordered ring with the order topology, if `f` tends to `C` and `g` tends to
`at_top` then `f + g` tends to `at_top`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_tendsto_left
{C : α} (hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 C)) (hg : tendsto g l at_top) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top :=
begin
obtain ⟨C', hC'⟩ : ∃ C', C' < C := no_bot C,
refine tendsto_at_top_add_left_of_le' _ C' _ hg,
rw tendsto_order at hf,
exact (hf.1 C' hC').mp (eventually_of_forall (λ x hx, le_of_lt hx))
end
/-- In a linearly ordered ring with the order topology, if `f` tends to `C` and `g` tends to
`at_bot` then `f + g` tends to `at_bot`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_tendsto_left
{C : α} (hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 C)) (hg : tendsto g l at_bot) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot :=
begin
obtain ⟨C', hC'⟩ : ∃ C', C < C' := no_top C,
refine tendsto_at_bot_add_left_of_ge' _ C' _ hg,
rw tendsto_order at hf,
exact (hf.2 C' hC').mp (eventually_of_forall (λ x hx, le_of_lt hx))
end
/-- In a linearly ordered ring with the order topology, if `f` tends to `at_top` and `g` tends to
`C` then `f + g` tends to `at_top`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_tendsto_right
{C : α} (hf : tendsto f l at_top) (hg : tendsto g l (𝓝 C)) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top :=
begin
convert tendsto_at_top_add_tendsto_left hg hf,
ext,
exact add_comm _ _,
end
/-- In a linearly ordered ring with the order topology, if `f` tends to `at_bot` and `g` tends to
`C` then `f + g` tends to `at_bot`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_tendsto_right
{C : α} (hf : tendsto f l at_bot) (hg : tendsto g l (𝓝 C)) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot :=
begin
convert tendsto_at_bot_add_tendsto_left hg hf,
ext,
exact add_comm _ _,
end
end linear_ordered_ring
lemma preimage_neg [add_group α] : preimage (has_neg.neg : α → α) = image (has_neg.neg : α → α) :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse neg_neg neg_neg).symm
lemma filter.map_neg [add_group α] : map (has_neg.neg : α → α) = comap (has_neg.neg : α → α) :=
funext $ assume f, map_eq_comap_of_inverse (funext neg_neg) (funext neg_neg)
section topological_add_group
variables [topological_space α] [ordered_add_comm_group α] [topological_add_group α]
lemma neg_preimage_closure {s : set α} : (λr:α, -r) ⁻¹' closure s = closure ((λr:α, -r) '' s) :=
have (λr:α, -r) ∘ (λr:α, -r) = id, from funext neg_neg,
by rw [preimage_neg]; exact
(subset.antisymm (image_closure_subset_closure_image continuous_neg) $
calc closure ((λ (r : α), -r) '' s) = (λr, -r) '' ((λr, -r) '' closure ((λ (r : α), -r) '' s)) :
by rw [←image_comp, this, image_id]
... ⊆ (λr, -r) '' closure ((λr, -r) '' ((λ (r : α), -r) '' s)) :
monotone_image $ image_closure_subset_closure_image continuous_neg
... = _ : by rw [←image_comp, this, image_id])
end topological_add_group
section order_topology
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
[linear_order α] [linear_order β] [order_topology α] [order_topology β]
lemma is_lub.nhds_within_ne_bot {a : α} {s : set α} (ha : is_lub s a) (hs : s.nonempty) :
ne_bot (𝓝[s] a) :=
let ⟨a', ha'⟩ := hs in
forall_sets_nonempty_iff_ne_bot.mp $ assume t ht,
let ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, ht⟩ := mem_inf_sets.mp ht in
by_cases
(assume h : a = a',
have a ∈ t₁, from mem_of_nhds ht₁,
have a ∈ t₂, from ht₂ $ by rwa [h],
⟨a, ht ⟨‹a ∈ t₁›, ‹a ∈ t₂›⟩⟩)
(assume : a ≠ a',
have a' < a, from lt_of_le_of_ne (ha.left ‹a' ∈ s›) this.symm,
let ⟨l, hl, hlt₁⟩ := exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds ht₁ ⟨a', this⟩ in
have ∃a'∈s, l < a',
from classical.by_contradiction $ assume : ¬ ∃a'∈s, l < a',
have ∀a'∈s, a' ≤ l, from assume a ha, not_lt.1 $ assume ha', this ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩,
have ¬ l < a, from not_lt.2 $ ha.right this,
this ‹l < a›,
let ⟨a', ha', ha'l⟩ := this in
have a' ∈ t₁, from hlt₁ ⟨‹l < a'›, ha.left ha'⟩,
⟨a', ht ⟨‹a' ∈ t₁›, ht₂ ‹a' ∈ s›⟩⟩)
lemma is_glb.nhds_within_ne_bot : ∀ {a : α} {s : set α}, is_glb s a → s.nonempty →
ne_bot (𝓝[s] a) :=
@is_lub.nhds_within_ne_bot (order_dual α) _ _ _
lemma is_lub_of_mem_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} {f : filter α}
(hsa : a ∈ upper_bounds s) (hsf : s ∈ f) [ne_bot (f ⊓ 𝓝 a)] : is_lub s a :=
⟨hsa, assume b hb,
not_lt.1 $ assume hba,
have s ∩ {a | b < a} ∈ f ⊓ 𝓝 a,
from inter_mem_inf_sets hsf (mem_nhds_sets (is_open_lt' _) hba),
let ⟨x, ⟨hxs, hxb⟩⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_sets this in
have b < b, from lt_of_lt_of_le hxb $ hb hxs,
lt_irrefl b this⟩
lemma is_glb_of_mem_nhds : ∀ {s : set α} {a : α} {f : filter α},
a ∈ lower_bounds s → s ∈ f → ne_bot (f ⊓ 𝓝 a) → is_glb s a :=
@is_lub_of_mem_nhds (order_dual α) _ _ _
lemma is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α} {b : β}
(hf : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, x ≤ y → f x ≤ f y) (ha : is_lub s a) (hs : s.nonempty)
(hb : tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b)) : is_lub (f '' s) b :=
have hnbot : ne_bot (𝓝[s] a), from ha.nhds_within_ne_bot hs,
have ∀a'∈s, ¬ b < f a',
from assume a' ha' h,
have ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, x < f a', from mem_nhds_sets (is_open_gt' _) h,
let ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, hs⟩ := mem_inf_sets.mp (hb this) in
by_cases
(assume h : a = a',
have a ∈ t₁ ∩ t₂, from ⟨mem_of_nhds ht₁, ht₂ $ by rwa [h]⟩,
have f a < f a', from hs this,
lt_irrefl (f a') $ by rwa [h] at this)
(assume h : a ≠ a',
have a' < a, from lt_of_le_of_ne (ha.left ha') h.symm,
have {x | a' < x} ∈ 𝓝 a, from mem_nhds_sets (is_open_lt' _) this,
have {x | a' < x} ∩ t₁ ∈ 𝓝 a, from inter_mem_sets this ht₁,
have ({x | a' < x} ∩ t₁) ∩ s ∈ 𝓝[s] a,
from inter_mem_inf_sets this (subset.refl s),
let ⟨x, ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, hx₃⟩ := hnbot.nonempty_of_mem this in
have hxa' : f x < f a', from hs ⟨hx₂, ht₂ hx₃⟩,
have ha'x : f a' ≤ f x, from hf _ ha' _ hx₃ $ le_of_lt hx₁,
lt_irrefl _ (lt_of_le_of_lt ha'x hxa')),
and.intro
(assume b' ⟨a', ha', h_eq⟩, h_eq ▸ not_lt.1 $ this _ ha')
(assume b' hb', by exactI (le_of_tendsto hb $
mem_inf_sets_of_right $ assume x hx, hb' $ mem_image_of_mem _ hx))
lemma is_glb_of_is_glb_of_tendsto {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α} {b : β}
(hf : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, x ≤ y → f x ≤ f y) : is_glb s a → s.nonempty →
tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) → is_glb (f '' s) b :=
@is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ f s a b
(λ x hx y hy, hf y hy x hx)
lemma is_glb_of_is_lub_of_tendsto : ∀ {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α} {b : β},
(∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, x ≤ y → f y ≤ f x) → is_lub s a → s.nonempty →
tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) → is_glb (f '' s) b :=
@is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto α (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _
lemma is_lub_of_is_glb_of_tendsto : ∀ {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α} {b : β},
(∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, x ≤ y → f y ≤ f x) → is_glb s a → s.nonempty →
tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) → is_lub (f '' s) b :=
@is_glb_of_is_glb_of_tendsto α (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _
lemma mem_closure_of_is_lub {a : α} {s : set α} (ha : is_lub s a) (hs : s.nonempty) :
a ∈ closure s :=
by rw closure_eq_cluster_pts; exact ha.nhds_within_ne_bot hs
lemma mem_of_is_lub_of_is_closed {a : α} {s : set α} (ha : is_lub s a) (hs : s.nonempty)
(sc : is_closed s) : a ∈ s :=
by rw ←sc.closure_eq; exact mem_closure_of_is_lub ha hs
lemma mem_closure_of_is_glb {a : α} {s : set α} (ha : is_glb s a) (hs : s.nonempty) :
a ∈ closure s :=
by rw closure_eq_cluster_pts; exact ha.nhds_within_ne_bot hs
lemma mem_of_is_glb_of_is_closed {a : α} {s : set α} (ha : is_glb s a) (hs : s.nonempty)
(sc : is_closed s) : a ∈ s :=
by rw ←sc.closure_eq; exact mem_closure_of_is_glb ha hs
/-- A compact set is bounded below -/
lemma is_compact.bdd_below {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [linear_order α]
[order_closed_topology α] [nonempty α] {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) : bdd_below s :=
begin
by_contra H,
letI := classical.DLO α,
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover_image (λ x (_ : x ∈ s), @is_open_Ioi _ _ _ _ x) _
with ⟨t, st, ft, ht⟩,
{ refine H (ft.bdd_below.imp $ λ C hC y hy, _),
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 (ht hy) with ⟨x, hx, xy⟩,
exact le_trans (hC hx) (le_of_lt xy) },
{ refine λ x hx, mem_bUnion_iff.2 (not_imp_comm.1 _ H),
exact λ h, ⟨x, λ y hy, le_of_not_lt (h.imp $ λ ys, ⟨_, hy, ys⟩)⟩ }
end
/-- A compact set is bounded above -/
lemma is_compact.bdd_above {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [linear_order α]
[order_topology α] : Π [nonempty α] {s : set α}, is_compact s → bdd_above s :=
@is_compact.bdd_below (order_dual α) _ _ _
end order_topology
section linear_order
variables [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [order_topology α] [densely_ordered α]
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, +∞)` is the closed interval `[a, +∞)`, unless `a` is a top
element. -/
lemma closure_Ioi' {a b : α} (hab : a < b) :
closure (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ exact closure_minimal Ioi_subset_Ici_self is_closed_Ici },
{ assume x hx,
by_cases h : x = a,
{ rw h, exact mem_closure_of_is_glb is_glb_Ioi ⟨_, hab⟩ },
{ exact subset_closure (lt_of_le_of_ne hx (ne.symm h)) } }
end
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, +∞)` is the closed interval `[a, +∞)`. -/
@[simp] lemma closure_Ioi (a : α) [no_top_order α] :
closure (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := no_top a in closure_Ioi' hb
/-- The closure of the interval `(-∞, a)` is the closed interval `(-∞, a]`, unless `a` is a bottom
element. -/
lemma closure_Iio' {a b : α} (hab : b < a) :
closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ exact closure_minimal Iio_subset_Iic_self is_closed_Iic },
{ assume x hx,
by_cases h : x = a,
{ rw h, exact mem_closure_of_is_lub is_lub_Iio ⟨_, hab⟩ },
{ apply subset_closure, by simpa [h] using lt_or_eq_of_le hx } }
end
/-- The closure of the interval `(-∞, a)` is the interval `(-∞, a]`. -/
@[simp] lemma closure_Iio (a : α) [no_bot_order α] :
closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := no_bot a in closure_Iio' hb
/-- The closure of the open interval `(a, b)` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp] lemma closure_Ioo {a b : α} (hab : a < b) :
closure (Ioo a b) = Icc a b :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ exact closure_minimal Ioo_subset_Icc_self is_closed_Icc },
{ have hab' : (Ioo a b).nonempty, from nonempty_Ioo.2 hab,
assume x hx,
by_cases h : x = a,
{ rw h, exact mem_closure_of_is_glb (is_glb_Ioo hab) hab' },
by_cases h' : x = b,
{ rw h', refine mem_closure_of_is_lub (is_lub_Ioo hab) hab' },
exact subset_closure ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne hx.1 (ne.symm h), by simpa [h'] using lt_or_eq_of_le hx.2⟩ }
end
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, b]` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp] lemma closure_Ioc {a b : α} (hab : a < b) :
closure (Ioc a b) = Icc a b :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ exact closure_minimal Ioc_subset_Icc_self is_closed_Icc },
{ apply subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ioc_self),
rw closure_Ioo hab }
end
/-- The closure of the interval `[a, b)` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp] lemma closure_Ico {a b : α} (hab : a < b) :
closure (Ico a b) = Icc a b :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ exact closure_minimal Ico_subset_Icc_self is_closed_Icc },
{ apply subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self),
rw closure_Ioo hab }
end
@[simp] lemma interior_Ici [no_bot_order α] {a : α} : interior (Ici a) = Ioi a :=
by rw [← compl_Iio, interior_compl, closure_Iio, compl_Iic]
@[simp] lemma interior_Iic [no_top_order α] {a : α} : interior (Iic a) = Iio a :=
by rw [← compl_Ioi, interior_compl, closure_Ioi, compl_Ici]
@[simp] lemma interior_Icc [no_bot_order α] [no_top_order α] {a b : α}:
interior (Icc a b) = Ioo a b :=
by rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp] lemma interior_Ico [no_bot_order α] {a b : α} : interior (Ico a b) = Ioo a b :=
by rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iio, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp] lemma interior_Ioc [no_top_order α] {a b : α} : interior (Ioc a b) = Ioo a b :=
by rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ioi, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp] lemma frontier_Ici [no_bot_order α] {a : α} : frontier (Ici a) = {a} :=
by simp [frontier]
@[simp] lemma frontier_Iic [no_top_order α] {a : α} : frontier (Iic a) = {a} :=
by simp [frontier]
@[simp] lemma frontier_Ioi [no_top_order α] {a : α} : frontier (Ioi a) = {a} :=
by simp [frontier]
@[simp] lemma frontier_Iio [no_bot_order α] {a : α} : frontier (Iio a) = {a} :=
by simp [frontier]
@[simp] lemma frontier_Icc [no_bot_order α] [no_top_order α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
frontier (Icc a b) = {a, b} :=
by simp [frontier, le_of_lt h, Icc_diff_Ioo_same]
@[simp] lemma frontier_Ioo {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ioo a b) = {a, b} :=
by simp [frontier, h, le_of_lt h, Icc_diff_Ioo_same]
@[simp] lemma frontier_Ico [no_bot_order α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ico a b) = {a, b} :=
by simp [frontier, h, le_of_lt h, Icc_diff_Ioo_same]
@[simp] lemma frontier_Ioc [no_top_order α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ioc a b) = {a, b} :=
by simp [frontier, h, le_of_lt h, Icc_diff_Ioo_same]
lemma nhds_within_Ioi_ne_bot' {a b c : α} (H₁ : a < c) (H₂ : a ≤ b) :
ne_bot (𝓝[Ioi a] b) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot.1 $ by { rw [closure_Ioi' H₁], exact H₂ }
lemma nhds_within_Ioi_ne_bot [no_top_order α] {a b : α} (H : a ≤ b) :
ne_bot (𝓝[Ioi a] b) :=
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := no_top a in nhds_within_Ioi_ne_bot' hc H
lemma nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot' {a b : α} (H : a < b) :
ne_bot (𝓝[Ioi a] a) :=
nhds_within_Ioi_ne_bot' H (le_refl a)
@[instance]
lemma nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot [no_top_order α] (a : α) :
ne_bot (𝓝[Ioi a] a) :=
nhds_within_Ioi_ne_bot (le_refl a)
lemma nhds_within_Iio_ne_bot' {a b c : α} (H₁ : a < c) (H₂ : b ≤ c) :
ne_bot (𝓝[Iio c] b) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot.1 $ by { rw [closure_Iio' H₁], exact H₂ }
lemma nhds_within_Iio_ne_bot [no_bot_order α] {a b : α} (H : a ≤ b) :
ne_bot (𝓝[Iio b] a) :=
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := no_bot b in nhds_within_Iio_ne_bot' hc H
lemma nhds_within_Iio_self_ne_bot' {a b : α} (H : a < b) :
ne_bot (𝓝[Iio b] b) :=
nhds_within_Iio_ne_bot' H (le_refl b)
@[instance]
lemma nhds_within_Iio_self_ne_bot [no_bot_order α] (a : α) :
ne_bot (𝓝[Iio a] a) :=
nhds_within_Iio_ne_bot (le_refl a)
end linear_order
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
[complete_linear_order β] [topological_space β] [order_topology β] [nonempty γ]
lemma Sup_mem_closure {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α]
[order_topology α] {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) :
Sup s ∈ closure s :=
mem_closure_of_is_lub (is_lub_Sup _) hs
lemma Inf_mem_closure {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α]
[order_topology α] {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) :
Inf s ∈ closure s :=
mem_closure_of_is_glb (is_glb_Inf _) hs
lemma is_closed.Sup_mem {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α]
[order_topology α] {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) (hc : is_closed s) :
Sup s ∈ s :=
mem_of_is_lub_of_is_closed (is_lub_Sup _) hs hc
lemma is_closed.Inf_mem {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α]
[order_topology α] {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) (hc : is_closed s) :
Inf s ∈ s :=
mem_of_is_glb_of_is_closed (is_glb_Inf _) hs hc
/-- A monotone function continuous at the supremum of a nonempty set sends this supremum to
the supremum of the image of this set. -/
lemma map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Sup s))
(Mf : monotone f) (hs : s.nonempty) :
f (Sup s) = Sup (f '' s) :=
--This is a particular case of the more general is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto
(is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto (λ x hx y hy xy, Mf xy) (is_lub_Sup _) hs $
Cf.mono_left inf_le_left).Sup_eq.symm
/-- A monotone function `s` sending `bot` to `bot` and continuous at the supremum of a set sends
this supremum to the supremum of the image of this set. -/
lemma map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Sup s))
(Mf : monotone f) (fbot : f ⊥ = ⊥) :
f (Sup s) = Sup (f '' s) :=
begin
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ simp [h, fbot] },
{ exact map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' Cf Mf h }
end
/-- A monotone function continuous at the indexed supremum over a nonempty `Sort` sends this indexed
supremum to the indexed supremum of the composition. -/
lemma map_supr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' {ι : Sort*} [nonempty ι] {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (supr g)) (Mf : monotone f) :
f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨆ i, f (g i) :=
by rw [supr, map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' Cf Mf (range_nonempty g), ← range_comp, supr]
/-- If a monotone function sending `bot` to `bot` is continuous at the indexed supremum over
a `Sort`, then it sends this indexed supremum to the indexed supremum of the composition. -/
lemma map_supr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (supr g)) (Mf : monotone f) (fbot : f ⊥ = ⊥) :
f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨆ i, f (g i) :=
by rw [supr, map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone Cf Mf fbot, ← range_comp, supr]
/-- A monotone function continuous at the infimum of a nonempty set sends this infimum to
the infimum of the image of this set. -/
lemma map_Inf_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Inf s))
(Mf : monotone f) (hs : s.nonempty) :
f (Inf s) = Inf (f '' s) :=
@map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ f s Cf
Mf.order_dual hs
/-- A monotone function `s` sending `top` to `top` and continuous at the infimum of a set sends
this infimum to the infimum of the image of this set. -/
lemma map_Inf_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Inf s))
(Mf : monotone f) (ftop : f ⊤ = ⊤) :
f (Inf s) = Inf (f '' s) :=
@map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ f s Cf
Mf.order_dual ftop
/-- A monotone function continuous at the indexed infimum over a nonempty `Sort` sends this indexed
infimum to the indexed infimum of the composition. -/
lemma map_infi_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' {ι : Sort*} [nonempty ι] {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (infi g)) (Mf : monotone f) :
f (⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f (g i) :=
@map_supr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ ι _ f g Cf
Mf.order_dual
/-- If a monotone function sending `top` to `top` is continuous at the indexed infimum over
a `Sort`, then it sends this indexed infimum to the indexed infimum of the composition. -/
lemma map_infi_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (infi g)) (Mf : monotone f) (ftop : f ⊤ = ⊤) :
f (infi g) = infi (f ∘ g) :=
@map_supr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ ι f g Cf
Mf.order_dual ftop
end complete_linear_order
section conditionally_complete_linear_order
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
[conditionally_complete_linear_order β] [topological_space β] [order_topology β] [nonempty γ]
lemma cSup_mem_closure {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) (B : bdd_above s) : Sup s ∈ closure s :=
mem_closure_of_is_lub (is_lub_cSup hs B) hs
lemma cInf_mem_closure {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) (B : bdd_below s) : Inf s ∈ closure s :=
mem_closure_of_is_glb (is_glb_cInf hs B) hs
lemma is_closed.cSup_mem {s : set α} (hc : is_closed s) (hs : s.nonempty) (B : bdd_above s) :
Sup s ∈ s :=
mem_of_is_lub_of_is_closed (is_lub_cSup hs B) hs hc
lemma is_closed.cInf_mem {s : set α} (hc : is_closed s) (hs : s.nonempty) (B : bdd_below s) :
Inf s ∈ s :=
mem_of_is_glb_of_is_closed (is_glb_cInf hs B) hs hc
/-- If a monotone function is continuous at the supremum of a nonempty bounded above set `s`,
then it sends this supremum to the supremum of the image of `s`. -/
lemma map_cSup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Sup s))
(Mf : monotone f) (ne : s.nonempty) (H : bdd_above s) :
f (Sup s) = Sup (f '' s) :=
begin
refine ((is_lub_cSup (ne.image f) (Mf.map_bdd_above H)).unique _).symm,
refine is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto (λx hx y hy xy, Mf xy) (is_lub_cSup ne H) ne _,
exact Cf.mono_left inf_le_left
end
/-- If a monotone function is continuous at the indexed supremum of a bounded function on
a nonempty `Sort`, then it sends this supremum to the supremum of the composition. -/
lemma map_csupr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {g : γ → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (⨆ i, g i)) (Mf : monotone f) (H : bdd_above (range g)) :
f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨆ i, f (g i) :=
by rw [supr, map_cSup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone Cf Mf (range_nonempty _) H, ← range_comp, supr]
/-- If a monotone function is continuous at the infimum of a nonempty bounded below set `s`,
then it sends this infimum to the infimum of the image of `s`. -/
lemma map_cInf_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Inf s))
(Mf : monotone f) (ne : s.nonempty) (H : bdd_below s) :
f (Inf s) = Inf (f '' s) :=
@map_cSup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ f s Cf
Mf.order_dual ne H
/-- A continuous monotone function sends indexed infimum to indexed infimum in conditionally
complete linear order, under a boundedness assumption. -/
lemma map_cinfi_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {g : γ → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (⨅ i, g i)) (Mf : monotone f) (H : bdd_below (range g)) :
f (⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f (g i) :=
@map_csupr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Cf Mf.order_dual H
/-- A bounded connected subset of a conditionally complete linear order includes the open interval
`(Inf s, Sup s)`. -/
lemma is_connected.Ioo_cInf_cSup_subset {s : set α} (hs : is_connected s) (hb : bdd_below s)
(ha : bdd_above s) :
Ioo (Inf s) (Sup s) ⊆ s :=
λ x hx, let ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ := (is_glb_lt_iff (is_glb_cInf hs.nonempty hb)).1 hx.1 in
let ⟨z, zs, hz⟩ := (lt_is_lub_iff (is_lub_cSup hs.nonempty ha)).1 hx.2 in
hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨le_of_lt hy, le_of_lt hz⟩
lemma eq_Icc_cInf_cSup_of_connected_bdd_closed {s : set α} (hc : is_connected s) (hb : bdd_below s)
(ha : bdd_above s) (hcl : is_closed s) :
s = Icc (Inf s) (Sup s) :=
subset.antisymm (subset_Icc_cInf_cSup hb ha) $
hc.Icc_subset (hcl.cInf_mem hc.nonempty hb) (hcl.cSup_mem hc.nonempty ha)
lemma is_preconnected.Ioi_cInf_subset {s : set α} (hs : is_preconnected s) (hb : bdd_below s)
(ha : ¬bdd_above s) :
Ioi (Inf s) ⊆ s :=
begin
have sne : s.nonempty := @nonempty_of_not_bdd_above α _ s ⟨Inf ∅⟩ ha,
intros x hx,
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ s, y < x := (is_glb_lt_iff (is_glb_cInf sne hb)).1 hx,
obtain ⟨z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s, x < z := not_bdd_above_iff.1 ha x,
exact hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨le_of_lt hy, le_of_lt hz⟩
end
lemma is_preconnected.Iio_cSup_subset {s : set α} (hs : is_preconnected s) (hb : ¬bdd_below s)
(ha : bdd_above s) :
Iio (Sup s) ⊆ s :=
@is_preconnected.Ioi_cInf_subset (order_dual α) _ _ _ s hs ha hb
/-- A preconnected set in a conditionally complete linear order is either one of the intervals
`[Inf s, Sup s]`, `[Inf s, Sup s)`, `(Inf s, Sup s]`, `(Inf s, Sup s)`, `[Inf s, +∞)`,
`(Inf s, +∞)`, `(-∞, Sup s]`, `(-∞, Sup s)`, `(-∞, +∞)`, or `∅`. The converse statement requires
`α` to be densely ordererd. -/
lemma is_preconnected.mem_intervals {s : set α} (hs : is_preconnected s) :
s ∈ ({Icc (Inf s) (Sup s), Ico (Inf s) (Sup s), Ioc (Inf s) (Sup s), Ioo (Inf s) (Sup s),
Ici (Inf s), Ioi (Inf s), Iic (Sup s), Iio (Sup s), univ, ∅} : set (set α)) :=
begin
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl|hne,
{ apply_rules [or.inr, mem_singleton] },
have hs' : is_connected s := ⟨hne, hs⟩,
by_cases hb : bdd_below s; by_cases ha : bdd_above s,
{ rcases mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset (hs'.Ioo_cInf_cSup_subset hb ha)
(subset_Icc_cInf_cSup hb ha) with hs|hs|hs|hs,
{ exact (or.inl hs) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inl hs) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inl hs) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inl hs) } },
{ refine (or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inr _),
cases mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset (hs.Ioi_cInf_subset hb ha) (λ x hx, cInf_le hb hx)
with hs hs,
{ exact or.inl hs },
{ exact or.inr (or.inl hs) } },
{ iterate 6 { apply or.inr },
cases mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset (hs.Iio_cSup_subset hb ha) (λ x hx, le_cSup ha hx)
with hs hs,
{ exact or.inl hs },
{ exact or.inr (or.inl hs) } },
{ iterate 8 { apply or.inr },
exact or.inl (hs.eq_univ_of_unbounded hb ha) }
end
/-- A preconnected set is either one of the intervals `Icc`, `Ico`, `Ioc`, `Ioo`, `Ici`, `Ioi`,
`Iic`, `Iio`, or `univ`, or `∅`. The converse statement requires `α` to be densely ordererd. Though
one can represent `∅` as `(Inf s, Inf s)`, we include it into the list of possible cases to improve
readability. -/
lemma set_of_is_preconnected_subset_of_ordered :
{s : set α | is_preconnected s} ⊆
-- bounded intervals
(range (uncurry Icc) ∪ range (uncurry Ico) ∪ range (uncurry Ioc) ∪ range (uncurry Ioo)) ∪
-- unbounded intervals and `univ`
(range Ici ∪ range Ioi ∪ range Iic ∪ range Iio ∪ {univ, ∅}) :=
begin
intros s hs,
rcases hs.mem_intervals with hs|hs|hs|hs|hs|hs|hs|hs|hs|hs,
{ exact (or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl ⟨(Inf s, Sup s), hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inr ⟨(Inf s, Sup s), hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inr ⟨(Inf s, Sup s), hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inl $ or.inr ⟨(Inf s, Sup s), hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl ⟨Inf s, hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inr ⟨Inf s, hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inr ⟨Sup s, hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inl $ or.inr ⟨Sup s, hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inl hs) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inr hs) }
end
/-- A "continuous induction principle" for a closed interval: if a set `s` meets `[a, b]`
on a closed subset, contains `a`, and the set `s ∩ [a, b)` has no maximal point, then `b ∈ s`. -/
lemma is_closed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt {a b : α} {s : set α} (hs : is_closed (s ∩ Icc a b))
(ha : a ∈ s) (hab : a ≤ b) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, (s ∩ Ioc x b).nonempty) :
b ∈ s :=
begin
let S := s ∩ Icc a b,
replace ha : a ∈ S, from ⟨ha, left_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩,
have Sbd : bdd_above S, from ⟨b, λ z hz, hz.2.2⟩,
let c := Sup (s ∩ Icc a b),
have c_mem : c ∈ S, from hs.cSup_mem ⟨_, ha⟩ Sbd,
have c_le : c ≤ b, from cSup_le ⟨_, ha⟩ (λ x hx, hx.2.2),
cases eq_or_lt_of_le c_le with hc hc, from hc ▸ c_mem.1,
exfalso,
rcases hgt c ⟨c_mem.1, c_mem.2.1, hc⟩ with ⟨x, xs, cx, xb⟩,
exact not_lt_of_le (le_cSup Sbd ⟨xs, le_trans (le_cSup Sbd ha) (le_of_lt cx), xb⟩) cx
end
/-- A "continuous induction principle" for a closed interval: if a set `s` meets `[a, b]`
on a closed subset, contains `a`, and for any `a ≤ x < y ≤ b`, `x ∈ s`, the set `s ∩ (x, y]`
is not empty, then `[a, b] ⊆ s`. -/
lemma is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt {a b : α} {s : set α} (hs : is_closed (s ∩ Icc a b))
(ha : a ∈ s) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, ∀ y ∈ Ioi x, (s ∩ Ioc x y).nonempty) :
Icc a b ⊆ s :=
begin
assume y hy,
have : is_closed (s ∩ Icc a y),
{ suffices : s ∩ Icc a y = s ∩ Icc a b ∩ Icc a y,
{ rw this, exact is_closed_inter hs is_closed_Icc },
rw [inter_assoc],
congr,
exact (inter_eq_self_of_subset_right $ Icc_subset_Icc_right hy.2).symm },
exact is_closed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt this ha hy.1
(λ x hx, hgt x ⟨hx.1, Ico_subset_Ico_right hy.2 hx.2⟩ y hx.2.2)
end
section densely_ordered
variables [densely_ordered α] {a b : α}
/-- A "continuous induction principle" for a closed interval: if a set `s` meets `[a, b]`
on a closed subset, contains `a`, and for any `x ∈ s ∩ [a, b)` the set `s` includes some open
neighborhood of `x` within `(x, +∞)`, then `[a, b] ⊆ s`. -/
lemma is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhds_within {a b : α} {s : set α}
(hs : is_closed (s ∩ Icc a b)) (ha : a ∈ s)
(hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, s ∈ 𝓝[Ioi x] x) :
Icc a b ⊆ s :=
begin
apply hs.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt ha,
rintros x ⟨hxs, hxab⟩ y hyxb,
have : s ∩ Ioc x y ∈ 𝓝[Ioi x] x,
from inter_mem_sets (hgt x ⟨hxs, hxab⟩) (Ioc_mem_nhds_within_Ioi ⟨le_refl _, hyxb⟩),
exact (nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot' hxab.2).nonempty_of_mem this
end
/-- A closed interval in a densely ordered conditionally complete linear order is preconnected. -/
lemma is_preconnected_Icc : is_preconnected (Icc a b) :=
is_preconnected_closed_iff.2
begin
rintros s t hs ht hab ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩,
wlog hxy : x ≤ y := le_total x y using [x y s t, y x t s],
have xyab : Icc x y ⊆ Icc a b := Icc_subset_Icc hx.1.1 hy.1.2,
by_contradiction hst,
suffices : Icc x y ⊆ s,
from hst ⟨y, xyab $ right_mem_Icc.2 hxy, this $ right_mem_Icc.2 hxy, hy.2⟩,
apply (is_closed_inter hs is_closed_Icc).Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhds_within hx.2,
rintros z ⟨zs, hz⟩,
have zt : z ∈ tᶜ, from λ zt, hst ⟨z, xyab $ Ico_subset_Icc_self hz, zs, zt⟩,
have : tᶜ ∩ Ioc z y ∈ 𝓝[Ioi z] z,
{ rw [← nhds_within_Ioc_eq_nhds_within_Ioi hz.2],
exact mem_nhds_within.2 ⟨tᶜ, ht, zt, subset.refl _⟩},
apply mem_sets_of_superset this,
have : Ioc z y ⊆ s ∪ t, from λ w hw, hab (xyab ⟨le_trans hz.1 (le_of_lt hw.1), hw.2⟩),
exact λ w ⟨wt, wzy⟩, (this wzy).elim id (λ h, (wt h).elim)
end
lemma is_preconnected_interval : is_preconnected (interval a b) := is_preconnected_Icc
lemma is_preconnected_iff_ord_connected {s : set α} :
is_preconnected s ↔ ord_connected s :=
⟨λ h x hx y hy, h.Icc_subset hx hy, λ h, is_preconnected_of_forall_pair $ λ x y hx hy,
⟨interval x y, h.interval_subset hx hy, left_mem_interval, right_mem_interval,
is_preconnected_interval⟩⟩
alias is_preconnected_iff_ord_connected ↔
is_preconnected.ord_connected set.ord_connected.is_preconnected
lemma is_preconnected_Ici : is_preconnected (Ici a) := ord_connected_Ici.is_preconnected
lemma is_preconnected_Iic : is_preconnected (Iic a) := ord_connected_Iic.is_preconnected
lemma is_preconnected_Iio : is_preconnected (Iio a) := ord_connected_Iio.is_preconnected
lemma is_preconnected_Ioi : is_preconnected (Ioi a) := ord_connected_Ioi.is_preconnected
lemma is_preconnected_Ioo : is_preconnected (Ioo a b) := ord_connected_Ioo.is_preconnected
lemma is_preconnected_Ioc : is_preconnected (Ioc a b) := ord_connected_Ioc.is_preconnected
lemma is_preconnected_Ico : is_preconnected (Ico a b) := ord_connected_Ico.is_preconnected
@[priority 100]
instance ordered_connected_space : preconnected_space α :=
⟨ord_connected_univ.is_preconnected⟩
/-- In a dense conditionally complete linear order, the set of preconnected sets is exactly
the set of the intervals `Icc`, `Ico`, `Ioc`, `Ioo`, `Ici`, `Ioi`, `Iic`, `Iio`, `(-∞, +∞)`,
or `∅`. Though one can represent `∅` as `(Inf s, Inf s)`, we include it into the list of
possible cases to improve readability. -/
lemma set_of_is_preconnected_eq_of_ordered :
{s : set α | is_preconnected s} =
-- bounded intervals
(range (uncurry Icc) ∪ range (uncurry Ico) ∪ range (uncurry Ioc) ∪ range (uncurry Ioo)) ∪
-- unbounded intervals and `univ`
(range Ici ∪ range Ioi ∪ range Iic ∪ range Iio ∪ {univ, ∅}) :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm set_of_is_preconnected_subset_of_ordered _,
simp only [subset_def, -mem_range, forall_range_iff, uncurry, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib,
mem_union, mem_set_of_eq, insert_eq, mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq, forall_true_iff, and_true,
is_preconnected_Icc, is_preconnected_Ico, is_preconnected_Ioc,
is_preconnected_Ioo, is_preconnected_Ioi, is_preconnected_Iio, is_preconnected_Ici,
is_preconnected_Iic, is_preconnected_univ, is_preconnected_empty],
end
/--Intermediate Value Theorem for continuous functions on closed intervals, case `f a ≤ t ≤ f b`.-/
lemma intermediate_value_Icc {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → β} (hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b)) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' (Icc a b) :=
is_preconnected_Icc.intermediate_value (left_mem_Icc.2 hab) (right_mem_Icc.2 hab) hf
/--Intermediate Value Theorem for continuous functions on closed intervals, case `f a ≥ t ≥ f b`.-/
lemma intermediate_value_Icc' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → β} (hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b)) :
Icc (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' (Icc a b) :=
is_preconnected_Icc.intermediate_value (right_mem_Icc.2 hab) (left_mem_Icc.2 hab) hf
/-- A continuous function which tendsto `at_top` `at_top` and to `at_bot` `at_bot` is surjective. -/
lemma surjective_of_continuous {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) (h_top : tendsto f at_top at_top)
(h_bot : tendsto f at_bot at_bot) :
function.surjective f :=
begin
intros p,
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b, p ≤ f b,
{ rcases ((tendsto_at_top_at_top _).mp h_top) p with ⟨b, hb⟩,
exact ⟨b, hb b rfl.ge⟩ },
obtain ⟨a, hab, ha⟩ : ∃ a, a ≤ b ∧ f a ≤ p,
{ rcases ((tendsto_at_bot_at_bot _).mp h_bot) p with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact ⟨min x b, min_le_right x b, hx (min x b) (min_le_left x b)⟩ },
rcases intermediate_value_Icc hab hf.continuous_on ⟨ha, hb⟩ with ⟨x, _, hx⟩,
exact ⟨x, hx⟩
end
/-- A continuous function which tendsto `at_bot` `at_top` and to `at_top` `at_bot` is surjective. -/
lemma surjective_of_continuous' {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) (h_top : tendsto f at_bot at_top)
(h_bot : tendsto f at_top at_bot) :
function.surjective f :=
@surjective_of_continuous (order_dual α) β _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf h_top h_bot
end densely_ordered
lemma is_compact.Inf_mem {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
Inf s ∈ s :=
hs.is_closed.cInf_mem ne_s hs.bdd_below
lemma is_compact.Sup_mem {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
Sup s ∈ s :=
@is_compact.Inf_mem (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ hs ne_s
lemma is_compact.is_glb_Inf {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
is_glb s (Inf s) :=
is_glb_cInf ne_s hs.bdd_below
lemma is_compact.is_lub_Sup {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
is_lub s (Sup s) :=
@is_compact.is_glb_Inf (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ hs ne_s
lemma is_compact.is_least_Inf {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
is_least s (Inf s) :=
⟨hs.Inf_mem ne_s, (hs.is_glb_Inf ne_s).1⟩
lemma is_compact.is_greatest_Sup {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
is_greatest s (Sup s) :=
@is_compact.is_least_Inf (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ hs ne_s
lemma is_compact.exists_is_least {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
∃ x, is_least s x :=
⟨_, hs.is_least_Inf ne_s⟩
lemma is_compact.exists_is_greatest {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
∃ x, is_greatest s x :=
⟨_, hs.is_greatest_Sup ne_s⟩
lemma is_compact.exists_is_glb {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
∃ x ∈ s, is_glb s x :=
⟨_, hs.Inf_mem ne_s, hs.is_glb_Inf ne_s⟩
lemma is_compact.exists_is_lub {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
∃ x ∈ s, is_lub s x :=
⟨_, hs.Sup_mem ne_s, hs.is_lub_Sup ne_s⟩
lemma is_compact.exists_Inf_image_eq {α : Type u} [topological_space α]
{s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : continuous_on f s) :
∃ x ∈ s, Inf (f '' s) = f x :=
let ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ := (hs.image_of_continuous_on hf).Inf_mem (ne_s.image f)
in ⟨x, hxs, hx.symm⟩
/-- The extreme value theorem: a continuous function realizes its minimum on a compact set -/
lemma is_compact.exists_forall_le {α : Type u} [topological_space α]
{s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : continuous_on f s) :
∃x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x ≤ f y :=
begin
rcases hs.exists_Inf_image_eq ne_s hf with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩,
refine ⟨x, hxs, λ y hy, _⟩,
rw ← hx,
exact ((hs.image_of_continuous_on hf).is_glb_Inf (ne_s.image f)).1 (mem_image_of_mem _ hy)
end
/-- The extreme value theorem: a continuous function realizes its maximum on a compact set -/
lemma is_compact.exists_forall_ge {α : Type u} [topological_space α]:
∀ {s : set α}, is_compact s → s.nonempty → ∀ {f : α → β}, continuous_on f s →
∃x∈s, ∀y∈s, f y ≤ f x :=
@is_compact.exists_forall_le (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _
lemma is_compact.exists_Sup_image_eq {α : Type u} [topological_space α]:
∀ {s : set α}, is_compact s → s.nonempty → ∀ {f : α → β}, continuous_on f s →
∃ x ∈ s, Sup (f '' s) = f x :=
@is_compact.exists_Inf_image_eq (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _
lemma eq_Icc_of_connected_compact {s : set α} (h₁ : is_connected s) (h₂ : is_compact s) :
s = Icc (Inf s) (Sup s) :=
eq_Icc_cInf_cSup_of_connected_bdd_closed h₁ h₂.bdd_below h₂.bdd_above
h₂.is_closed
end conditionally_complete_linear_order
section liminf_limsup
section order_closed_topology
variables [semilattice_sup α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
lemma is_bounded_le_nhds (a : α) : (𝓝 a).is_bounded (≤) :=
match forall_le_or_exists_lt_sup a with
| or.inl h := ⟨a, eventually_of_forall h⟩
| or.inr ⟨b, hb⟩ := ⟨b, ge_mem_nhds hb⟩
end
lemma filter.tendsto.is_bounded_under_le {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α}
(h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : f.is_bounded_under (≤) u :=
(is_bounded_le_nhds a).mono h
lemma is_cobounded_ge_nhds (a : α) : (𝓝 a).is_cobounded (≥) :=
(is_bounded_le_nhds a).is_cobounded_flip
lemma filter.tendsto.is_cobounded_under_ge {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α}
[ne_bot f] (h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : f.is_cobounded_under (≥) u :=
h.is_bounded_under_le.is_cobounded_flip
end order_closed_topology
section order_closed_topology
variables [semilattice_inf α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
lemma is_bounded_ge_nhds (a : α) : (𝓝 a).is_bounded (≥) :=
@is_bounded_le_nhds (order_dual α) _ _ _ a
lemma filter.tendsto.is_bounded_under_ge {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α}
(h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : f.is_bounded_under (≥) u :=
(is_bounded_ge_nhds a).mono h
lemma is_cobounded_le_nhds (a : α) : (𝓝 a).is_cobounded (≤) :=
(is_bounded_ge_nhds a).is_cobounded_flip
lemma filter.tendsto.is_cobounded_under_le {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α}
[ne_bot f] (h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : f.is_cobounded_under (≤) u :=
h.is_bounded_under_ge.is_cobounded_flip
end order_closed_topology
section conditionally_complete_linear_order
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order α]
theorem lt_mem_sets_of_Limsup_lt {f : filter α} {b} (h : f.is_bounded (≤)) (l : f.Limsup < b) :
∀ᶠ a in f, a < b :=
let ⟨c, (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, a ≤ c), hcb⟩ := exists_lt_of_cInf_lt h l in
mem_sets_of_superset h $ assume a hac, lt_of_le_of_lt hac hcb
theorem gt_mem_sets_of_Liminf_gt : ∀ {f : filter α} {b}, f.is_bounded (≥) → b < f.Liminf →
∀ᶠ a in f, b < a :=
@lt_mem_sets_of_Limsup_lt (order_dual α) _
variables [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
/-- If the liminf and the limsup of a filter coincide, then this filter converges to
their common value, at least if the filter is eventually bounded above and below. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_Limsup_eq_Liminf {f : filter α} {a : α}
(hl : f.is_bounded (≤)) (hg : f.is_bounded (≥)) (hs : f.Limsup = a) (hi : f.Liminf = a) :
f ≤ 𝓝 a :=
tendsto_order.2 $ and.intro
(assume b hb, gt_mem_sets_of_Liminf_gt hg $ hi.symm ▸ hb)
(assume b hb, lt_mem_sets_of_Limsup_lt hl $ hs.symm ▸ hb)
theorem Limsup_nhds (a : α) : Limsup (𝓝 a) = a :=
cInf_intro (is_bounded_le_nhds a)
(assume a' (h : {n : α | n ≤ a'} ∈ 𝓝 a), show a ≤ a', from @mem_of_nhds α _ a _ h)
(assume b (hba : a < b), show ∃c (h : {n : α | n ≤ c} ∈ 𝓝 a), c < b, from
match dense_or_discrete a b with
| or.inl ⟨c, hac, hcb⟩ := ⟨c, ge_mem_nhds hac, hcb⟩
| or.inr ⟨_, h⟩ := ⟨a, (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (gt_mem_nhds hba) h, hba⟩
end)
theorem Liminf_nhds : ∀ (a : α), Liminf (𝓝 a) = a :=
@Limsup_nhds (order_dual α) _ _ _
/-- If a filter is converging, its limsup coincides with its limit. -/
theorem Liminf_eq_of_le_nhds {f : filter α} {a : α} [ne_bot f] (h : f ≤ 𝓝 a) : f.Liminf = a :=
have hb_ge : is_bounded (≥) f, from (is_bounded_ge_nhds a).mono h,
have hb_le : is_bounded (≤) f, from (is_bounded_le_nhds a).mono h,
le_antisymm
(calc f.Liminf ≤ f.Limsup : Liminf_le_Limsup hb_le hb_ge
... ≤ (𝓝 a).Limsup :
Limsup_le_Limsup_of_le h hb_ge.is_cobounded_flip (is_bounded_le_nhds a)
... = a : Limsup_nhds a)
(calc a = (𝓝 a).Liminf : (Liminf_nhds a).symm
... ≤ f.Liminf :
Liminf_le_Liminf_of_le h (is_bounded_ge_nhds a) hb_le.is_cobounded_flip)
/-- If a filter is converging, its liminf coincides with its limit. -/
theorem Limsup_eq_of_le_nhds : ∀ {f : filter α} {a : α} [ne_bot f], f ≤ 𝓝 a → f.Limsup = a :=
@Liminf_eq_of_le_nhds (order_dual α) _ _ _
end conditionally_complete_linear_order
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
-- In complete_linear_order, the above theorems take a simpler form
/-- If the liminf and the limsup of a function coincide, then the limit of the function
exists and has the same value -/
theorem tendsto_of_liminf_eq_limsup {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α}
(hinf : liminf f u = a) (hsup : limsup f u = a) : tendsto u f (𝓝 a) :=
le_nhds_of_Limsup_eq_Liminf is_bounded_le_of_top is_bounded_ge_of_bot hsup hinf
/-- If a number `a` is less than or equal to the `liminf` of a function `f` at some filter
and is greater than or equal to the `limsup` of `f`, then `f` tends to `a` along this filter. -/
theorem tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α}
(hinf : a ≤ liminf f u) (hsup : limsup f u ≤ a) :
tendsto u f (𝓝 a) :=
if hf : f = ⊥ then hf.symm ▸ tendsto_bot
else by haveI : ne_bot f := hf; exact tendsto_of_liminf_eq_limsup
(le_antisymm (le_trans liminf_le_limsup hsup) hinf)
(le_antisymm hsup (le_trans hinf liminf_le_limsup))
/-- If a function has a limit, then its limsup coincides with its limit-/
theorem filter.tendsto.limsup_eq {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} [ne_bot f]
(h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : limsup f u = a :=
Limsup_eq_of_le_nhds h
/-- If a function has a limit, then its liminf coincides with its limit-/
theorem filter.tendsto.liminf_eq {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} [ne_bot f]
(h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : liminf f u = a :=
Liminf_eq_of_le_nhds h
end complete_linear_order
end liminf_limsup
end order_topology
lemma order_topology_of_nhds_abs
{α : Type*} [decidable_linear_ordered_add_comm_group α] [topological_space α]
(h_nhds : ∀a:α, 𝓝 a = (⨅r>0, 𝓟 {b | abs (a - b) < r})) : order_topology α :=
order_topology.mk $ eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds $ assume a:α, le_antisymm_iff.mpr
begin
simp [infi_and, topological_space.nhds_generate_from,
h_nhds, le_infi_iff, -le_principal_iff, and_comm],
refine ⟨λ s ha b hs, _, λ r hr, _⟩,
{ rcases hs with rfl | rfl,
{ refine infi_le_of_le (a - b)
(infi_le_of_le (lt_sub_left_of_add_lt $ by simpa using ha) $
principal_mono.mpr $ assume c (hc : abs (a - c) < a - b), _),
have : a - c < a - b := lt_of_le_of_lt (le_abs_self _) hc,
exact lt_of_neg_lt_neg (lt_of_add_lt_add_left this) },
{ refine infi_le_of_le (b - a)
(infi_le_of_le (lt_sub_left_of_add_lt $ by simpa using ha) $
principal_mono.mpr $ assume c (hc : abs (a - c) < b - a), _),
have : abs (c - a) < b - a, {rw abs_sub; simpa using hc},
have : c - a < b - a := lt_of_le_of_lt (le_abs_self _) this,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_right this } },
{ have h : {b | abs (a - b) < r} = {b | a - r < b} ∩ {b | b < a + r},
from set.ext (assume b,
by simp [abs_lt, sub_lt, lt_sub_iff_add_lt, sub_lt_iff_lt_add']; cc),
rw [h, ← inf_principal],
apply le_inf _ _,
{ exact infi_le_of_le {b : α | a - r < b} (infi_le_of_le (sub_lt_self a hr) $
infi_le_of_le (a - r) $ infi_le _ (or.inl rfl)) },
{ exact infi_le_of_le {b : α | b < a + r} (infi_le_of_le (lt_add_of_pos_right _ hr) $
infi_le_of_le (a + r) $ infi_le _ (or.inr rfl)) } }
end
lemma tendsto_at_top_supr_nat [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
(f : ℕ → α) (hf : monotone f) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 (⨆i, f i)) :=
tendsto_order.2 $ and.intro
(assume a ha, let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_supr_iff.1 ha in
mem_at_top_sets.2 ⟨n, assume i hi, lt_of_lt_of_le hn (hf hi)⟩)
(assume a ha, univ_mem_sets' (assume n, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_supr _ n) ha))
lemma tendsto_at_top_infi_nat [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
(f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀{n m}, n ≤ m → f m ≤ f n) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 (⨅i, f i)) :=
@tendsto_at_top_supr_nat (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ @hf
lemma supr_eq_of_tendsto {α} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
{f : ℕ → α} {a : α} (hf : monotone f) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a) → supr f = a :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_at_top_supr_nat f hf)
lemma infi_eq_of_tendsto {α} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
{f : ℕ → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀n m, n ≤ m → f m ≤ f n) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a) → infi f = a :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_at_top_infi_nat f hf)
/-- $\lim_{x\to+\infty}|x|=+\infty$ -/
lemma tendsto_abs_at_top_at_top [decidable_linear_ordered_add_comm_group α] :
tendsto (abs : α → α) at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_mono (λ n, le_abs_self _) tendsto_id
local notation `|` x `|` := abs x
lemma decidable_linear_ordered_add_comm_group.tendsto_nhds
[decidable_linear_ordered_add_comm_group α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α] {β : Type*}
(f : β → α) (x : filter β) (a : α) :
filter.tendsto f x (nhds a) ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : α), ∀ᶠ b in x, |f b - a| < ε :=
begin
rw (show _, from @tendsto_order α), -- does not work without `show` for some reason
split,
{ rintros ⟨hyp_lt_a, hyp_gt_a⟩ ε ε_pos,
suffices : {b : β | f b - a < ε ∧ a - f b < ε} ∈ x, by simpa only [abs_sub_lt_iff],
have set1 : {b : β | a - f b < ε} ∈ x,
{ have : {b : β | a - ε < f b} ∈ x, from hyp_lt_a (a - ε) (sub_lt_self a ε_pos),
have : ∀ b, a - f b < ε ↔ a - ε < f b, by { intro _, exact sub_lt },
simpa only [this] },
have set2 : {b : β | f b - a < ε} ∈ x,
{ have : {b : β | a + ε > f b} ∈ x, from hyp_gt_a (a + ε) (lt_add_of_pos_right a ε_pos),
have : ∀ b, f b - a < ε ↔ a + ε > f b, by { intro _, exact sub_lt_iff_lt_add' },
simpa only [this] },
exact (x.inter_sets set2 set1) },
{ assume hyp_ε_pos,
split,
{ assume a' a'_lt_a,
let ε := a - a',
have : {b : β | |f b - a| < ε} ∈ x, from hyp_ε_pos ε (sub_pos.elim_right a'_lt_a),
have : {b : β | f b - a < ε ∧ a - f b < ε} ∈ x, by simpa only [abs_sub_lt_iff] using this,
have : {b : β | a - f b < ε} ∈ x, from x.sets_of_superset this (set.inter_subset_right _ _),
have : ∀ b, a' < f b ↔ a - f b < ε, by {intro b, rw [sub_lt, sub_sub_self] },
simpa only [this] },
{ assume a' a'_gt_a,
let ε := a' - a,
have : {b : β | |f b - a| < ε} ∈ x, from hyp_ε_pos ε (sub_pos.elim_right a'_gt_a),
have : {b : β | f b - a < ε ∧ a - f b < ε} ∈ x, by simpa only [abs_sub_lt_iff] using this,
have : {b : β | f b - a < ε} ∈ x, from x.sets_of_superset this (set.inter_subset_left _ _),
have : ∀ b, f b < a' ↔ f b - a < ε, by { intro b, simp [lt_sub_iff_add_lt] },
simpa only [this] }}
end
/-!
Here is a counter-example to a version of the following with `conditionally_complete_lattice α`.
Take `α = [0, 1) → ℝ` with the natural lattice structure, `ι = ℕ`. Put `f n x = -x^n`. Then
`⨆ n, f n = 0` while none of `f n` is strictly greater than the constant function `-0.5`.
-/
lemma tendsto_at_top_csupr {ι α : Type*} [preorder ι] [topological_space α]
[conditionally_complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
{f : ι → α} (h_mono : monotone f) (hbdd : bdd_above $ range f) :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 (⨆i, f i)) :=
begin
by_cases hi : nonempty ι,
{ resetI,
rw tendsto_order,
split,
{ intros a h,
cases exists_lt_of_lt_csupr h with N hN,
apply eventually.mono (mem_at_top N),
exact λ i hi, lt_of_lt_of_le hN (h_mono hi) },
{ exact λ a h, eventually_of_forall (λ n, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_csupr hbdd n) h) } },
{ exact tendsto_of_not_nonempty hi }
end
lemma tendsto_at_top_supr {ι α : Type*} [preorder ι] [topological_space α]
[complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α] {f : ι → α} (h_mono : monotone f) :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 (⨆i, f i)) :=
tendsto_at_top_csupr h_mono (order_top.bdd_above _)
lemma tendsto_of_monotone {ι α : Type*} [preorder ι] [topological_space α]
[conditionally_complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α] {f : ι → α} (h_mono : monotone f) :
tendsto f at_top at_top ∨ (∃ l, tendsto f at_top (𝓝 l)) :=
if H : bdd_above (range f) then or.inr ⟨_, tendsto_at_top_csupr h_mono H⟩
else or.inl $ tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone' h_mono H
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_inv_nhds_within_Ioi [ordered_comm_group α]
[topological_space α] [topological_group α] {a : α} :
tendsto has_inv.inv (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝[Iio (a⁻¹)] (a⁻¹)) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf $ by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_inv_nhds_within_Iio [ordered_comm_group α]
[topological_space α] [topological_group α] {a : α} :
tendsto has_inv.inv (𝓝[Iio a] a) (𝓝[Ioi (a⁻¹)] (a⁻¹)) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf $ by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_inv_nhds_within_Ioi_inv [ordered_comm_group α]
[topological_space α] [topological_group α] {a : α} :
tendsto has_inv.inv (𝓝[Ioi (a⁻¹)] (a⁻¹)) (𝓝[Iio a] a) :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @tendsto_inv_nhds_within_Ioi _ _ _ _ (a⁻¹)
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_inv_nhds_within_Iio_inv [ordered_comm_group α]
[topological_space α] [topological_group α] {a : α} :
tendsto has_inv.inv (𝓝[Iio (a⁻¹)] (a⁻¹)) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @tendsto_inv_nhds_within_Iio _ _ _ _ (a⁻¹)
lemma nhds_left_sup_nhds_right (a : α) [topological_space α] [linear_order α] :
nhds_within a (Iic a) ⊔ nhds_within a (Ici a) = 𝓝 a :=
by rw [← nhds_within_union, Iic_union_Ici, nhds_within_univ]
lemma nhds_left'_sup_nhds_right (a : α) [topological_space α] [linear_order α] :
nhds_within a (Iio a) ⊔ nhds_within a (Ici a) = 𝓝 a :=
by rw [← nhds_within_union, Iio_union_Ici, nhds_within_univ]
lemma nhds_left_sup_nhds_right' (a : α) [topological_space α] [linear_order α] :
nhds_within a (Iic a) ⊔ nhds_within a (Ioi a) = 𝓝 a :=
by rw [← nhds_within_union, Iic_union_Ioi, nhds_within_univ]
lemma continuous_at_iff_continuous_left_right [topological_space α] [linear_order α]
[topological_space β] {a : α} {f : α → β} :
continuous_at f a ↔ continuous_within_at f (Iic a) a ∧ continuous_within_at f (Ici a) a :=
by simp only [continuous_within_at, continuous_at, ← tendsto_sup, nhds_left_sup_nhds_right]
lemma continuous_on_Icc_extend_from_Ioo [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [densely_ordered α]
[order_topology α] [topological_space β] [regular_space β] {f : α → β} {a b : α}
{la lb : β} (hab : a < b) (hf : continuous_on f (Ioo a b))
(ha : tendsto f (nhds_within a $ Ioi a) (𝓝 la))
(hb : tendsto f (nhds_within b $ Iio b) (𝓝 lb)) :
continuous_on (extend_from (Ioo a b) f) (Icc a b) :=
begin
apply continuous_on_extend_from,
{ rw closure_Ioo hab, },
{ intros x x_in,
rcases mem_Ioo_or_eq_endpoints_of_mem_Icc x_in with rfl | rfl | h,
{ use la,
simpa [hab] },
{ use lb,
simpa [hab] },
{ use [f x, hf x h] } }
end
lemma eq_lim_at_left_extend_from_Ioo [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [densely_ordered α]
[order_topology α] [topological_space β] [t2_space β] {f : α → β} {a b : α}
{la : β} (hab : a < b) (ha : tendsto f (nhds_within a $ Ioi a) (𝓝 la)) :
extend_from (Ioo a b) f a = la :=
begin
apply extend_from_eq,
{ rw closure_Ioo hab,
simp only [le_of_lt hab, left_mem_Icc, right_mem_Icc] },
{ simpa [hab] }
end
lemma eq_lim_at_right_extend_from_Ioo [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [densely_ordered α]
[order_topology α] [topological_space β] [t2_space β] {f : α → β} {a b : α}
{lb : β} (hab : a < b) (hb : tendsto f (nhds_within b $ Iio b) (𝓝 lb)) :
extend_from (Ioo a b) f b = lb :=
begin
apply extend_from_eq,
{ rw closure_Ioo hab,
simp only [le_of_lt hab, left_mem_Icc, right_mem_Icc] },
{ simpa [hab] }
end
lemma continuous_on_Ico_extend_from_Ioo [topological_space α]
[linear_order α] [densely_ordered α] [order_topology α] [topological_space β]
[regular_space β] {f : α → β} {a b : α} {la : β} (hab : a < b) (hf : continuous_on f (Ioo a b))
(ha : tendsto f (nhds_within a $ Ioi a) (𝓝 la)) :
continuous_on (extend_from (Ioo a b) f) (Ico a b) :=
begin
apply continuous_on_extend_from,
{ rw [closure_Ioo hab], exact Ico_subset_Icc_self, },
{ intros x x_in,
rcases mem_Ioo_or_eq_left_of_mem_Ico x_in with rfl | h,
{ use la,
simpa [hab] },
{ use [f x, hf x h] } }
end
lemma continuous_on_Ioc_extend_from_Ioo [topological_space α]
[linear_order α] [densely_ordered α] [order_topology α] [topological_space β]
[regular_space β] {f : α → β} {a b : α} {lb : β} (hab : a < b) (hf : continuous_on f (Ioo a b))
(hb : tendsto f (nhds_within b $ Iio b) (𝓝 lb)) :
continuous_on (extend_from (Ioo a b) f) (Ioc a b) :=
begin
have := @continuous_on_Ico_extend_from_Ioo (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f _ _ _ hab,
erw [dual_Ico, dual_Ioi, dual_Ioo] at this,
exact this hf hb
end
lemma continuous_within_at_Ioi_iff_Ici
{α β : Type*} [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [topological_space β] {a : α} {f : α → β} :
continuous_within_at f (Ioi a) a ↔ continuous_within_at f (Ici a) a :=
begin
split,
{ intros h s hs,
specialize h hs,
rw [mem_map, mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter] at *,
rcases h with ⟨u, huna, hu⟩,
use [u, huna],
{ intros x hx,
cases hx with hxu hx,
by_cases h : x = a,
{ rw [h, mem_set_of_eq],
exact mem_of_nhds hs, },
exact hu ⟨hxu, lt_of_le_of_ne hx (ne_comm.2 h)⟩ } },
{ intros h,
exact h.mono Ioi_subset_Ici_self }
end
lemma continuous_within_at_Iio_iff_Iic
{α β : Type*} [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [topological_space β] {a : α} {f : α → β} :
continuous_within_at f (Iio a) a ↔ continuous_within_at f (Iic a) a :=
begin
have := @continuous_within_at_Ioi_iff_Ici (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ f,
erw [dual_Ici, dual_Ioi] at this,
exact this,
end
lemma continuous_at_iff_continuous_left'_right' [topological_space α] [linear_order α]
[topological_space β] {a : α} {f : α → β} :
continuous_at f a ↔ continuous_within_at f (Iio a) a ∧ continuous_within_at f (Ioi a) a :=
by rw [continuous_within_at_Ioi_iff_Ici, continuous_within_at_Iio_iff_Iic,
continuous_at_iff_continuous_left_right]
section homeomorphisms
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
section linear_order
variables [linear_order α] [order_topology α]
variables [linear_order β] [order_topology β]
/-- If `f : α → β` is strictly monotone and surjective, it is everywhere continuous. -/
lemma continuous_at_of_strict_mono_surjective
{f : α → β} (h_mono : strict_mono f) (h_surj : function.surjective f) (a : α) :
continuous_at f a :=
continuous_at_iff_continuous_left_right.mpr
⟨continuous_left_of_strict_mono_surjective h_mono h_surj a,
continuous_right_of_strict_mono_surjective h_mono h_surj a⟩
/-- If `f : α → β` is strictly monotone and surjective, it is continuous. -/
lemma continuous_of_strict_mono_surjective
{f : α → β} (h_mono : strict_mono f) (h_surj : function.surjective f) :
continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr (continuous_at_of_strict_mono_surjective h_mono h_surj)
/-- If `f : α ≃ β` is strictly monotone, its inverse is continuous. -/
lemma continuous_inv_of_strict_mono_equiv (e : α ≃ β) (h_mono : strict_mono e.to_fun) :
continuous e.inv_fun :=
begin
have hinv_mono : strict_mono e.inv_fun,
{ intros x y hxy,
rw [← h_mono.lt_iff_lt, e.right_inv, e.right_inv],
exact hxy },
have hinv_surj : function.surjective e.inv_fun,
{ intros x,
exact ⟨e.to_fun x, e.left_inv x⟩ },
exact continuous_of_strict_mono_surjective hinv_mono hinv_surj
end
/-- If `f : α → β` is strictly monotone and surjective, it is a homeomorphism. -/
noncomputable def homeomorph_of_strict_mono_surjective
(f : α → β) (h_mono : strict_mono f) (h_surj : function.surjective f) :
homeomorph α β :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.of_bijective f ⟨strict_mono.injective h_mono, h_surj⟩,
continuous_to_fun := continuous_of_strict_mono_surjective h_mono h_surj,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_inv_of_strict_mono_equiv
(equiv.of_bijective f ⟨strict_mono.injective h_mono, h_surj⟩) h_mono }
@[simp] lemma coe_homeomorph_of_strict_mono_surjective
(f : α → β) (h_mono : strict_mono f) (h_surj : function.surjective f) :
(homeomorph_of_strict_mono_surjective f h_mono h_surj : α → β) = f := rfl
end linear_order
section conditionally_complete_linear_order
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order α] [densely_ordered α] [order_topology α]
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order β] [order_topology β]
/-- If `f : α → β` is strictly monotone and continuous, and tendsto `at_top` `at_top` and to
`at_bot` `at_bot`, then it is a homeomorphism. -/
noncomputable def homeomorph_of_strict_mono_continuous
(f : α → β) (h_mono : strict_mono f) (h_cont : continuous f) (h_top : tendsto f at_top at_top)
(h_bot : tendsto f at_bot at_bot) :
homeomorph α β :=
homeomorph_of_strict_mono_surjective f h_mono (surjective_of_continuous h_cont h_top h_bot)
@[simp] lemma coe_homeomorph_of_strict_mono_continuous
(f : α → β) (h_mono : strict_mono f) (h_cont : continuous f) (h_top : tendsto f at_top at_top)
(h_bot : tendsto f at_bot at_bot) :
(homeomorph_of_strict_mono_continuous f h_mono h_cont h_top h_bot : α → β) = f := rfl
end conditionally_complete_linear_order
end homeomorphisms
|
5b0900343d58e94a5a050a676656635164d89ce4 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/data/fin/tuple/monotone.lean | d5973fc02cc0393e49bd99646f098fb075821d76 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,887 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import data.fin.vec_notation
/-!
# Monotone finite sequences
In this file we prove `simp` lemmas that allow to simplify propositions like `monotone ![a, b, c]`.
-/
open set fin matrix function
variables {α : Type*}
lemma lift_fun_vec_cons {n : ℕ} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trans α r] {f : fin (n + 1) → α} {a : α} :
((<) ⇒ r) (vec_cons a f) (vec_cons a f) ↔ r a (f 0) ∧ ((<) ⇒ r) f f :=
by simp only [lift_fun_iff_succ r, forall_fin_succ, cons_val_succ, cons_val_zero, ← succ_cast_succ,
cast_succ_zero]
variables [preorder α] {n : ℕ} {f : fin (n + 1) → α} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma strict_mono_vec_cons : strict_mono (vec_cons a f) ↔ a < f 0 ∧ strict_mono f :=
lift_fun_vec_cons (<)
@[simp] lemma monotone_vec_cons : monotone (vec_cons a f) ↔ a ≤ f 0 ∧ monotone f :=
by simpa only [monotone_iff_forall_lt] using @lift_fun_vec_cons α n (≤) _ f a
@[simp] lemma strict_anti_vec_cons : strict_anti (vec_cons a f) ↔ f 0 < a ∧ strict_anti f :=
lift_fun_vec_cons (>)
@[simp] lemma antitone_vec_cons : antitone (vec_cons a f) ↔ f 0 ≤ a ∧ antitone f :=
@monotone_vec_cons αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
lemma strict_mono.vec_cons (hf : strict_mono f) (ha : a < f 0) :
strict_mono (vec_cons a f) :=
strict_mono_vec_cons.2 ⟨ha, hf⟩
lemma strict_anti.vec_cons (hf : strict_anti f) (ha : f 0 < a) :
strict_anti (vec_cons a f) :=
strict_anti_vec_cons.2 ⟨ha, hf⟩
lemma monotone.vec_cons (hf : monotone f) (ha : a ≤ f 0) :
monotone (vec_cons a f) :=
monotone_vec_cons.2 ⟨ha, hf⟩
lemma antitone.vec_cons (hf : antitone f) (ha : f 0 ≤ a) :
antitone (vec_cons a f) :=
antitone_vec_cons.2 ⟨ha, hf⟩
example : monotone ![1, 2, 2, 3] := by simp [subsingleton.monotone]
|
e1449d95c9b7801c6e90d0fd955ee1d29e1e53f0 | 969dbdfed67fda40a6f5a2b4f8c4a3c7dc01e0fb | /src/topology/continuous_map.lean | c35555b5be2ccec8817fefe19a0b10f6ccd9344b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | SAAluthwela/mathlib | 62044349d72dd63983a8500214736aa7779634d3 | 83a4b8b990907291421de54a78988c024dc8a552 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,433,873,417 | 1,615,998,031,000 | 1,615,998,031,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,676 | lean | /-
Copyright © 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Nicolò Cavalleri.
-/
import topology.subset_properties
import topology.tactic
import topology.algebra.ordered
/-!
# Continuous bundled map
In this file we define the type `continuous_map` of continuous bundled maps.
-/
/-- Bundled continuous maps. -/
@[protect_proj]
structure continuous_map (α : Type*) (β : Type*)
[topological_space α] [topological_space β] :=
(to_fun : α → β)
(continuous_to_fun : continuous to_fun . tactic.interactive.continuity')
notation `C(` α `, ` β `)` := continuous_map α β
namespace continuous_map
attribute [continuity] continuous_map.continuous_to_fun
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [topological_space γ]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (C(α, β)) := ⟨_, continuous_map.to_fun⟩
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe {f : C(α, β)} : f.to_fun = (f : α → β) := rfl
variables {α β} {f g : continuous_map α β}
protected lemma continuous (f : C(α, β)) : continuous f := f.continuous_to_fun
@[continuity] lemma coe_continuous : continuous (f : α → β) := f.continuous_to_fun
@[ext] theorem ext (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
by cases f; cases g; congr'; exact funext H
instance [inhabited β] : inhabited C(α, β) :=
⟨{ to_fun := λ _, default _, }⟩
lemma coe_inj ⦃f g : C(α, β)⦄ (h : (f : α → β) = g) : f = g :=
by cases f; cases g; cases h; refl
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (f : α → β) (h : continuous f) :
⇑(⟨f, h⟩ : continuous_map α β) = f := rfl
section
variables (α β)
/--
The continuous functions from `α` to `β` are the same as the plain functions when `α` is discrete.
-/
@[simps]
def equiv_fn_of_discrete [discrete_topology α] : C(α, β) ≃ (α → β) :=
⟨(λ f, f), (λ f, ⟨f, continuous_of_discrete_topology⟩),
λ f, by { ext, refl, }, λ f, by { ext, refl, }⟩
end
/-- The identity as a continuous map. -/
def id : C(α, α) := ⟨id⟩
@[simp] lemma id_coe : (id : α → α) = id := rfl
lemma id_apply (a : α) : id a = a := rfl
/-- The composition of continuous maps, as a continuous map. -/
def comp (f : C(β, γ)) (g : C(α, β)) : C(α, γ) := ⟨f ∘ g⟩
@[simp] lemma comp_coe (f : C(β, γ)) (g : C(α, β)) : (comp f g : α → γ) = f ∘ g := rfl
lemma comp_apply (f : C(β, γ)) (g : C(α, β)) (a : α) : comp f g a = f (g a) := rfl
/-- Constant map as a continuous map -/
def const (b : β) : C(α, β) := ⟨λ x, b⟩
@[simp] lemma const_coe (b : β) : (const b : α → β) = (λ x, b) := rfl
lemma const_apply (b : β) (a : α) : const b a = b := rfl
/-!
We now set up the partial order and lattice structure (given by pointwise min and max)
on continuous functions.
-/
section lattice
instance partial_order [partial_order β] :
partial_order C(α, β) :=
partial_order.lift (λ f, f.to_fun) (by tidy)
lemma le_def [partial_order β] {f g : C(α, β)} : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ a, f a ≤ g a :=
pi.le_def
lemma lt_def [partial_order β] {f g : C(α, β)} :
f < g ↔ (∀ a, f a ≤ g a) ∧ (∃ a, f a < g a) :=
pi.lt_def
instance has_sup [linear_order β] [order_closed_topology β] : has_sup C(α, β) :=
{ sup := λ f g, { to_fun := λ a, max (f a) (g a), } }
@[simp] lemma sup_apply [linear_order β] [order_closed_topology β] (f g : C(α, β)) (a : α) :
(f ⊔ g) a = max (f a) (g a) :=
rfl
instance [linear_order β] [order_closed_topology β] : semilattice_sup C(α, β) :=
{ le_sup_left := λ f g, le_def.mpr (by simp [le_refl]),
le_sup_right := λ f g, le_def.mpr (by simp [le_refl]),
sup_le := λ f₁ f₂ g w₁ w₂, le_def.mpr (λ a, by simp [le_def.mp w₁ a, le_def.mp w₂ a]),
..continuous_map.partial_order,
..continuous_map.has_sup, }
instance has_inf [linear_order β] [order_closed_topology β] : has_inf C(α, β) :=
{ inf := λ f g, { to_fun := λ a, min (f a) (g a), } }
@[simp] lemma inf_apply [linear_order β] [order_closed_topology β] (f g : C(α, β)) (a : α) :
(f ⊓ g) a = min (f a) (g a) :=
rfl
instance [linear_order β] [order_closed_topology β] : semilattice_inf C(α, β) :=
{ inf_le_left := λ f g, le_def.mpr (by simp [le_refl]),
inf_le_right := λ f g, le_def.mpr (by simp [le_refl]),
le_inf := λ f₁ f₂ g w₁ w₂, le_def.mpr (λ a, by simp [le_def.mp w₁ a, le_def.mp w₂ a]),
..continuous_map.partial_order,
..continuous_map.has_inf, }
instance [linear_order β] [order_closed_topology β] : lattice C(α, β) :=
{ ..continuous_map.semilattice_inf,
..continuous_map.semilattice_sup }
end lattice
end continuous_map
|
639d2cc0eaea54e71b58ceac0efe10c29d2c460b | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/topology/uniform_space/uniform_convergence.lean | 51617d510def593c3c97ebda6abf359be1c6db43 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,751 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import topology.uniform_space.basic
/-!
# Uniform convergence
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` (with values in a metric space) converges uniformly on a set `s` to a
function `f` if, for all `ε > 0`, for all large enough `n`, one has for all `y ∈ s` the inequality
`dist (f y, Fₙ y) < ε`. Under uniform convergence, many properties of the `Fₙ` pass to the limit,
most notably continuity. We prove this in the file, defining the notion of uniform convergence
in the more general setting of uniform spaces, and with respect to an arbitrary indexing set
endowed with a filter (instead of just `ℕ` with `at_top`).
## Main results
Let `α` be a topological space, `β` a uniform space, `Fₙ` and `f` be functions from `α`to `β`
(where the index `n` belongs to an indexing type `ι` endowed with a filter `p`).
* `tendsto_uniformly_on F f p s`: the fact that `Fₙ` converges uniformly to `f` on `s`. This means
that, for any entourage `u` of the diagonal, for large enough `n` (with respect to `p`), one has
`(f y, Fₙ y) ∈ u` for all `y ∈ s`.
* `tendsto_uniformly F f p`: same notion with `s = univ`.
* `tendsto_uniformly_on.continuous_on`: a uniform limit on a set of functions which are continuous
on this set is itself continuous on this set.
* `tendsto_uniformly.continuous`: a uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous.
* `tendsto_uniformly_on.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f` on a set `s`, and `gₙ` tends
to `x` within `s`, then `Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x` if `f` is continuous at `x` within `s`.
* `tendsto_uniformly.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f`, and `gₙ` tends to `x`, then
`Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x`.
We also define notions where the convergence is locally uniform, called
`tendsto_locally_uniformly_on F f p s` and `tendsto_locally_uniformly F f p`. The previous theorems
all have corresponding versions under locally uniform convergence.
## Implementation notes
Most results hold under weaker assumptions of locally uniform approximation. In a first section,
we prove the results under these weaker assumptions. Then, we derive the results on uniform
convergence from them.
## Tags
Uniform limit, uniform convergence, tends uniformly to
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale topological_space classical uniformity
open set filter
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-!
### Different notions of uniform convergence
We define uniform convergence and locally uniform convergence, on a set or in the whole space.
-/
variables {ι : Type*} [uniform_space β]
{F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {s s' : set α} {x : α} {p : filter ι} {g : ι → α}
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` with
respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x ∈ s`. -/
def tendsto_uniformly_on (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : filter ι) (s : set α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x ∈ s, (f x, F n x) ∈ u
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` with respect to a
filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x`. -/
def tendsto_uniformly (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : filter ι) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x, (f x, F n x) ∈ u
lemma tendsto_uniformly_on_univ :
tendsto_uniformly_on F f p univ ↔ tendsto_uniformly F f p :=
by simp [tendsto_uniformly_on, tendsto_uniformly]
lemma tendsto_uniformly_on.mono {s' : set α}
(h : tendsto_uniformly_on F f p s) (h' : s' ⊆ s) : tendsto_uniformly_on F f p s' :=
λ u hu, (h u hu).mono (λ n hn x hx, hn x (h' hx))
lemma tendsto_uniformly.tendsto_uniformly_on
(h : tendsto_uniformly F f p) : tendsto_uniformly_on F f p s :=
(tendsto_uniformly_on_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ s)
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a set -/
lemma tendsto_uniformly_on.comp (h : tendsto_uniformly_on F f p s) (g : γ → α) :
tendsto_uniformly_on (λ n, F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) :=
begin
assume u hu,
apply (h u hu).mono (λ n hn, _),
exact λ x hx, hn _ hx
end
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence -/
lemma tendsto_uniformly.comp (h : tendsto_uniformly F f p) (g : γ → α) :
tendsto_uniformly (λ n, F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p :=
begin
assume u hu,
apply (h u hu).mono (λ n hn, _),
exact λ x, hn _
end
variable [topological_space α]
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges locally uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function
`f` with respect to a filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, for any `x ∈ s`, one
has `p`-eventually `(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `y` in a neighborhood of `x` in `s`. -/
def tendsto_locally_uniformly_on (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : filter ι) (s : set α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ nhds_within x s, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, (f y, F n y) ∈ u
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges locally uniformly to a limiting function `f` with respect
to a filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, for any `x`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `y` in a neighborhood of `x`. -/
def tendsto_locally_uniformly (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : filter ι) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ (x : α), ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, (f y, F n y) ∈ u
lemma tendsto_uniformly_on.tendsto_locally_uniformly_on
(h : tendsto_uniformly_on F f p s) : tendsto_locally_uniformly_on F f p s :=
λ u hu x hx, ⟨s, self_mem_nhds_within, h u hu⟩
lemma tendsto_uniformly.tendsto_locally_uniformly
(h : tendsto_uniformly F f p) : tendsto_locally_uniformly F f p :=
λ u hu x, ⟨univ, univ_mem_sets, by simpa using h u hu⟩
lemma tendsto_locally_uniformly_on.mono (h : tendsto_locally_uniformly_on F f p s) (h' : s' ⊆ s) :
tendsto_locally_uniformly_on F f p s' :=
begin
assume u hu x hx,
rcases h u hu x (h' hx) with ⟨t, ht, H⟩,
exact ⟨t, nhds_within_mono x h' ht, H.mono (λ n, id)⟩
end
lemma tendsto_locally_uniformly_on_univ :
tendsto_locally_uniformly_on F f p univ ↔ tendsto_locally_uniformly F f p :=
by simp [tendsto_locally_uniformly_on, tendsto_locally_uniformly, nhds_within_univ]
lemma tendsto_locally_uniformly_on.comp [topological_space γ] {t : set γ}
(h : tendsto_locally_uniformly_on F f p s)
(g : γ → α) (hg : maps_to g t s) (cg : continuous_on g t) :
tendsto_locally_uniformly_on (λ n, (F n) ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p t :=
begin
assume u hu x hx,
rcases h u hu (g x) (hg hx) with ⟨a, ha, H⟩,
have : g⁻¹' a ∈ nhds_within x t :=
((cg x hx).preimage_mem_nhds_within' (nhds_within_mono (g x) hg.image_subset ha)),
exact ⟨g ⁻¹' a, this, H.mono (λ n hn y hy, hn _ hy)⟩
end
lemma tendsto_locally_uniformly.comp [topological_space γ]
(h : tendsto_locally_uniformly F f p) (g : γ → α) (cg : continuous g) :
tendsto_locally_uniformly (λ n, (F n) ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p :=
begin
rw ← tendsto_locally_uniformly_on_univ at h ⊢,
rw continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ at cg,
exact h.comp _ (maps_to_univ _ _) cg
end
/-!
### Uniform approximation
In this section, we give lemmas ensuring that a function is continuous if it can be approximated
uniformly by continuous functions. We give various versions, within a set or the whole space, at
a single point or at all points, with locally uniform approximation or uniform approximation. All
the statements are derived from a statement about locally uniform approximation within a set at
a point, called `continuous_within_at_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous_within_at`. -/
/-- A function which can be locally uniformly approximated by functions which are continuous
within a set at a point is continuous within this set at this point. -/
lemma continuous_within_at_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous_within_at
(hx : x ∈ s) (L : ∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∃ t ∈ nhds_within x s, ∃ n, ∀ y ∈ t, (f y, F n y) ∈ u)
(C : ∀ n, continuous_within_at (F n) s x) : continuous_within_at f s x :=
begin
apply uniform.continuous_within_at_iff'_left.2 (λ u₀ hu₀, _),
obtain ⟨u₁, h₁, u₁₀⟩ : ∃ (u : set (β × β)) (H : u ∈ 𝓤 β), comp_rel u u ⊆ u₀ :=
comp_mem_uniformity_sets hu₀,
obtain ⟨u₂, h₂, hsymm, u₂₁⟩ : ∃ (u : set (β × β)) (H : u ∈ 𝓤 β),
(∀{a b}, (a, b) ∈ u → (b, a) ∈ u) ∧ comp_rel u u ⊆ u₁ := comp_symm_of_uniformity h₁,
rcases L u₂ h₂ with ⟨t, tx, n, ht⟩,
have A : ∀ᶠ y in nhds_within x s, (f y, F n y) ∈ u₂ := eventually.mono tx ht,
have B : ∀ᶠ y in nhds_within x s, (F n y, F n x) ∈ u₂ :=
uniform.continuous_within_at_iff'_left.1 (C n) h₂,
have C : ∀ᶠ y in nhds_within x s, (f y, F n x) ∈ u₁ :=
(A.and B).mono (λ y hy, u₂₁ (prod_mk_mem_comp_rel hy.1 hy.2)),
have : (F n x, f x) ∈ u₁ :=
u₂₁ (prod_mk_mem_comp_rel (refl_mem_uniformity h₂) (hsymm (A.self_of_nhds_within hx))),
exact C.mono (λ y hy, u₁₀ (prod_mk_mem_comp_rel hy this))
end
/-- A function which can be locally uniformly approximated by functions which are continuous at
a point is continuous at this point. -/
lemma continuous_at_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous_at
(L : ∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ n, ∀ y ∈ t, (f y, F n y) ∈ u) (C : ∀ n, continuous_at (F n) x) :
continuous_at f x :=
begin
simp only [← continuous_within_at_univ] at C ⊢,
apply continuous_within_at_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous_within_at (mem_univ _) _ C,
simpa [nhds_within_univ] using L
end
/-- A function which can be locally uniformly approximated by functions which are continuous
on a set is continuous on this set. -/
lemma continuous_on_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous_on
(L : ∀ (x ∈ s) (u ∈ 𝓤 β), ∃t ∈ nhds_within x s, ∃n, ∀ y ∈ t, (f y, F n y) ∈ u)
(C : ∀ n, continuous_on (F n) s) : continuous_on f s :=
λ x hx, continuous_within_at_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous_within_at hx
(L x hx) (λ n, C n x hx)
/-- A function which can be uniformly approximated by functions which are continuous on a set
is continuous on this set. -/
lemma continuous_on_of_uniform_approx_of_continuous_on
(L : ∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∃ n, ∀ y ∈ s, (f y, F n y) ∈ u) :
(∀ n, continuous_on (F n) s) → continuous_on f s :=
continuous_on_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous_on
(λ x hx u hu, ⟨s, self_mem_nhds_within, L u hu⟩)
/-- A function which can be locally uniformly approximated by continuous functions is continuous. -/
lemma continuous_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous
(L : ∀ (x : α), ∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ n, ∀ y ∈ t, (f y, F n y) ∈ u)
(C : ∀ n, continuous (F n)) : continuous f :=
begin
simp only [continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ] at ⊢ C,
apply continuous_on_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous_on _ C,
simpa [nhds_within_univ] using L
end
/-- A function which can be uniformly approximated by continuous functions is continuous. -/
lemma continuous_of_uniform_approx_of_continuous (L : ∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∃ N, ∀ y, (f y, F N y) ∈ u) :
(∀ n, continuous (F n)) → continuous f :=
continuous_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous $ λx u hu,
⟨univ, by simpa [filter.univ_mem_sets] using L u hu⟩
/-!
### Uniform limits
From the previous statements on uniform approximation, we deduce continuity results for uniform
limits.
-/
/-- A locally uniform limit on a set of functions which are continuous on this set is itself
continuous on this set. -/
lemma tendsto_locally_uniformly_on.continuous_on (h : tendsto_locally_uniformly_on F f p s)
(hc : ∀ n, continuous_on (F n) s) (hp : p ≠ ⊥) : continuous_on f s :=
begin
apply continuous_on_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous_on (λ x hx u hu, _) hc,
rcases h u hu x hx with ⟨t, ht, H⟩,
exact ⟨t, ht, H.exists hp⟩
end
/-- A uniform limit on a set of functions which are continuous on this set is itself continuous
on this set. -/
lemma tendsto_uniformly_on.continuous_on (h : tendsto_uniformly_on F f p s)
(hc : ∀ n, continuous_on (F n) s) (hp : p ≠ ⊥) : continuous_on f s :=
h.tendsto_locally_uniformly_on.continuous_on hc hp
/-- A locally uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous. -/
lemma tendsto_locally_uniformly.continuous (h : tendsto_locally_uniformly F f p)
(hc : ∀ n, continuous (F n)) (hp : p ≠ ⊥) : continuous f :=
begin
apply continuous_of_locally_uniform_approx_of_continuous (λ x u hu, _) hc,
rcases h u hu x with ⟨t, ht, H⟩,
exact ⟨t, ht, H.exists hp⟩
end
/-- A uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous. -/
lemma tendsto_uniformly.continuous (h : tendsto_uniformly F f p)
(hc : ∀ n, continuous (F n)) (hp : p ≠ ⊥) : continuous f :=
h.tendsto_locally_uniformly.continuous hc hp
/-!
### Composing limits under uniform convergence
In general, if `Fₙ` converges pointwise to a function `f`, and `gₙ` tends to `x`, it is not true
that `Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x`. It is true however if the convergence of `Fₙ` to `f` is uniform. In
this paragraph, we prove variations around this statement.
-/
/-- If `Fₙ` converges locally uniformly on a neighborhood of `x` within a set `s` to a function `f`
which is continuous at `x` within `s `, and `gₙ` tends to `x` within `s`, then `Fₙ (gₙ)` tends
to `f x`. -/
lemma tendsto_comp_of_locally_uniform_limit_within
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (hg : tendsto g p (nhds_within x s))
(hunif : ∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∃ t ∈ nhds_within x s, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, (f y, F n y) ∈ u) :
tendsto (λ n, F n (g n)) p (𝓝 (f x)) :=
begin
apply uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.2 (λ u₀ hu₀, _),
obtain ⟨u₁, h₁, u₁₀⟩ : ∃ (u : set (β × β)) (H : u ∈ 𝓤 β), comp_rel u u ⊆ u₀ :=
comp_mem_uniformity_sets hu₀,
rcases hunif u₁ h₁ with ⟨s, sx, hs⟩,
have A : ∀ᶠ n in p, g n ∈ s := hg sx,
have B : ∀ᶠ n in p, (f x, f (g n)) ∈ u₁ := hg (uniform.continuous_within_at_iff'_right.1 h h₁),
refine ((hs.and A).and B).mono (λ y hy, _),
rcases hy with ⟨⟨H1, H2⟩, H3⟩,
exact u₁₀ (prod_mk_mem_comp_rel H3 (H1 _ H2))
end
/-- If `Fₙ` converges locally uniformly on a neighborhood of `x` to a function `f` which is
continuous at `x`, and `gₙ` tends to `x`, then `Fₙ (gₙ)` tends to `f x`. -/
lemma tendsto_comp_of_locally_uniform_limit (h : continuous_at f x) (hg : tendsto g p (𝓝 x))
(hunif : ∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, (f y, F n y) ∈ u) :
tendsto (λ n, F n (g n)) p (𝓝 (f x)) :=
begin
rw ← continuous_within_at_univ at h,
rw ← nhds_within_univ at hunif hg,
exact tendsto_comp_of_locally_uniform_limit_within h hg hunif
end
/-- If `Fₙ` tends locally uniformly to `f` on a set `s`, and `gₙ` tends to `x` within `s`, then
`Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x` if `f` is continuous at `x` within `s` and `x ∈ s`. -/
lemma tendsto_locally_uniformly_on.tendsto_comp (h : tendsto_locally_uniformly_on F f p s)
(hf : continuous_within_at f s x) (hx : x ∈ s) (hg : tendsto g p (nhds_within x s)) :
tendsto (λ n, F n (g n)) p (𝓝 (f x)) :=
tendsto_comp_of_locally_uniform_limit_within hf hg (λ u hu, h u hu x hx)
/-- If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f` on a set `s`, and `gₙ` tends to `x` within `s`, then `Fₙ gₙ` tends
to `f x` if `f` is continuous at `x` within `s`. -/
lemma tendsto_uniformly_on.tendsto_comp (h : tendsto_uniformly_on F f p s)
(hf : continuous_within_at f s x) (hg : tendsto g p (nhds_within x s)) :
tendsto (λ n, F n (g n)) p (𝓝 (f x)) :=
tendsto_comp_of_locally_uniform_limit_within hf hg (λ u hu, ⟨s, self_mem_nhds_within, h u hu⟩)
/-- If `Fₙ` tends locally uniformly to `f`, and `gₙ` tends to `x`, then `Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x`. -/
lemma tendsto_locally_uniformly.tendsto_comp (h : tendsto_locally_uniformly F f p)
(hf : continuous_at f x) (hg : tendsto g p (𝓝 x)) : tendsto (λ n, F n (g n)) p (𝓝 (f x)) :=
tendsto_comp_of_locally_uniform_limit hf hg (λ u hu, h u hu x)
/-- If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f`, and `gₙ` tends to `x`, then `Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x`. -/
lemma tendsto_uniformly.tendsto_comp (h : tendsto_uniformly F f p)
(hf : continuous_at f x) (hg : tendsto g p (𝓝 x)) : tendsto (λ n, F n (g n)) p (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h.tendsto_locally_uniformly.tendsto_comp hf hg
|
72bd817355090e8970f7c459674a1e9f34098024 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/topology/subset_properties.lean | db7641c548ac8914001b0c5dbb54e7952567a0f7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 54,400 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import topology.continuous_on
/-!
# Properties of subsets of topological spaces
## Main definitions
`compact`, `is_clopen`, `is_irreducible`, `is_connected`, `is_totally_disconnected`, `is_totally_separated`
TODO: write better docs
## On the definition of irreducible and connected sets/spaces
In informal mathematics, irreducible and connected spaces are assumed to be nonempty.
We formalise the predicate without that assumption
as `is_preirreducible` and `is_preconnected` respectively.
In other words, the only difference is whether the empty space
counts as irreducible and/or connected.
There are good reasons to consider the empty space to be “too simple to be simple”
See also https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple,
and in particular
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple#relationship_to_biased_definitions.
-/
open set filter classical
open_locale classical topological_space
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [topological_space α]
/- compact sets -/
section compact
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every filter `f` that contains `s`,
every set of `f` also meets every neighborhood of some `a ∈ s`. -/
def compact (s : set α) := ∀f, f ≠ ⊥ → f ≤ principal s → ∃a∈s, f ⊓ 𝓝 a ≠ ⊥
lemma compact.inter_right {s t : set α} (hs : compact s) (ht : is_closed t) : compact (s ∩ t) :=
assume f hnf hstf,
let ⟨a, hsa, (ha : f ⊓ 𝓝 a ≠ ⊥)⟩ := hs f hnf (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_left _ _))) in
have a ∈ t,
from ht.mem_of_nhds_within_ne_bot $ ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot (by { rw inf_comm at ha, exact ha }) $
inf_le_inf_left _ (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_right _ _))),
⟨a, ⟨hsa, this⟩, ha⟩
lemma compact.inter_left {s t : set α} (ht : compact t) (hs : is_closed s) : compact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
lemma compact_diff {s t : set α} (hs : compact s) (ht : is_open t) : compact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (is_closed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
lemma compact_of_is_closed_subset {s t : set α}
(hs : compact s) (ht : is_closed t) (h : t ⊆ s) : compact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
lemma compact.adherence_nhdset {s t : set α} {f : filter α}
(hs : compact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ principal s) (ht₁ : is_open t) (ht₂ : ∀a∈s, 𝓝 a ⊓ f ≠ ⊥ → a ∈ t) :
t ∈ f :=
classical.by_cases mem_sets_of_eq_bot $
assume : f ⊓ principal (- t) ≠ ⊥,
let ⟨a, ha, (hfa : f ⊓ principal (-t) ⊓ 𝓝 a ≠ ⊥)⟩ := hs _ this $ inf_le_left_of_le hf₂ in
have a ∈ t,
from ht₂ a ha $ ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hfa $ le_inf inf_le_right $ inf_le_left_of_le inf_le_left,
have (-t) ∩ t ∈ nhds_within a (-t),
from inter_mem_nhds_within _ (mem_nhds_sets ht₁ this),
have A : nhds_within a (-t) = ⊥,
from empty_in_sets_eq_bot.1 $ compl_inter_self t ▸ this,
have nhds_within a (-t) ≠ ⊥,
from ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hfa $ le_inf inf_le_right $ inf_le_left_of_le inf_le_right,
absurd A this
lemma compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds {s : set α} :
compact s ↔ (∀f, is_ultrafilter f → f ≤ principal s → ∃a∈s, f ≤ 𝓝 a) :=
⟨assume hs : compact s, assume f hf hfs,
let ⟨a, ha, h⟩ := hs _ hf.left hfs in
⟨a, ha, le_of_ultrafilter hf h⟩,
assume hs : (∀f, is_ultrafilter f → f ≤ principal s → ∃a∈s, f ≤ 𝓝 a),
assume f hf hfs,
let ⟨a, ha, (h : ultrafilter_of f ≤ 𝓝 a)⟩ :=
hs (ultrafilter_of f) (ultrafilter_ultrafilter_of hf) (le_trans ultrafilter_of_le hfs) in
have ultrafilter_of f ⊓ 𝓝 a ≠ ⊥,
by simp only [inf_of_le_left, h]; exact (ultrafilter_ultrafilter_of hf).left,
⟨a, ha, ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot this (inf_le_inf_right _ ultrafilter_of_le)⟩⟩
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
lemma compact.elim_finite_subcover {s : set α} {ι : Type v} (hs : compact s)
(U : ι → set α) (hUo : ∀i, is_open (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ t : finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
classical.by_contradiction $ assume h,
have h : ∀ t : finset ι, ¬ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i,
from assume t ht, h ⟨t, ht⟩,
let
f : filter α := (⨅t:finset ι, principal (s - ⋃ i ∈ t, U i)),
⟨a, ha⟩ := (@ne_empty_iff_nonempty α s).1 (assume h', h ∅ $ h'.symm ▸ empty_subset _)
in
have f ≠ ⊥, from infi_ne_bot_of_directed ⟨a⟩
(assume t₁ t₂, ⟨t₁ ∪ t₂,
principal_mono.mpr $ diff_subset_diff_right $
bUnion_subset_bUnion_left $ finset.subset_union_left _ _,
principal_mono.mpr $ diff_subset_diff_right $
bUnion_subset_bUnion_left $ finset.subset_union_right _ _⟩)
(assume t, show principal (s \ _) ≠ ⊥,
by simp only [ne.def, principal_eq_bot_iff, diff_eq_empty]; exact h _),
have f ≤ principal s, from infi_le_of_le ∅ $
show principal (s \ _) ≤ principal s, from le_principal_iff.2 (diff_subset _ _),
let
⟨a, ha, (h : f ⊓ 𝓝 a ≠ ⊥)⟩ := hs f ‹f ≠ ⊥› this,
⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, (ha : a ∈ U i)⟩ := hsU ha
in
have f ≤ principal (- U i),
from infi_le_of_le {i} $ principal_mono.mpr $ show s - _ ⊆ - U i, by simp [diff_subset_iff],
have is_closed (- U i), from is_open_compl_iff.mp $ by rw compl_compl; exact hUo i,
have a ∈ - U i, from is_closed_iff_nhds.mp this _ $ ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot h $
le_inf inf_le_right (inf_le_left_of_le ‹f ≤ principal (- U i)›),
this ‹a ∈ U i›
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids this compact set. -/
lemma compact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {s : set α} {ι : Type v} (hs : compact s)
(Z : ι → set α) (hZc : ∀i, is_closed (Z i)) (hsZ : s ∩ (⋂ i, Z i) = ∅) :
∃ t : finset ι, s ∩ (⋂ i ∈ t, Z i) = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_finite_subcover (λ i, - Z i) hZc
(by simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, set.mem_Union,
exists_prop, set.mem_inter_eq, not_and, iff_self, set.mem_Inter, set.mem_compl_eq] using hsZ)
in
⟨t, by simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, set.mem_Union,
exists_prop, set.mem_inter_eq, not_and, iff_self, set.mem_Inter, set.mem_compl_eq] using ht⟩
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
lemma compact.nonempty_Inter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed
{ι : Type v} [hι : nonempty ι] (Z : ι → set α) (hZd : directed (⊇) Z)
(hZn : ∀ i, (Z i).nonempty) (hZc : ∀ i, compact (Z i)) (hZcl : ∀ i, is_closed (Z i)) :
(⋂ i, Z i).nonempty :=
begin
apply hι.elim,
intro i₀,
let Z' := λ i, Z i ∩ Z i₀,
suffices : (⋂ i, Z' i).nonempty,
{ exact nonempty.mono (Inter_subset_Inter $ assume i, inter_subset_left (Z i) (Z i₀)) this },
rw ← ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
intro H,
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ : ∃ (t : finset ι), ((Z i₀) ∩ ⋂ (i ∈ t), Z' i) = ∅,
from (hZc i₀).elim_finite_subfamily_closed Z'
(assume i, is_closed_inter (hZcl i) (hZcl i₀)) (by rw [H, inter_empty]),
obtain ⟨i₁, hi₁⟩ : ∃ i₁ : ι, Z i₁ ⊆ Z i₀ ∧ ∀ i ∈ t, Z i₁ ⊆ Z' i,
{ rcases directed.finset_le hι hZd t with ⟨i, hi⟩,
rcases hZd i i₀ with ⟨i₁, hi₁, hi₁₀⟩,
use [i₁, hi₁₀],
intros j hj,
exact subset_inter (subset.trans hi₁ (hi j hj)) hi₁₀ },
suffices : ((Z i₀) ∩ ⋂ (i ∈ t), Z' i).nonempty,
{ rw ← ne_empty_iff_nonempty at this, contradiction },
refine nonempty.mono _ (hZn i₁),
exact subset_inter hi₁.left (subset_bInter hi₁.right)
end
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for sequences indexed by `ℕ`:
the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
lemma compact.nonempty_Inter_of_sequence_nonempty_compact_closed
(Z : ℕ → set α) (hZd : ∀ i, Z (i+1) ⊆ Z i)
(hZn : ∀ i, (Z i).nonempty) (hZ0 : compact (Z 0)) (hZcl : ∀ i, is_closed (Z i)) :
(⋂ i, Z i).nonempty :=
have Zmono : _, from @monotone_of_monotone_nat (order_dual _) _ Z hZd,
have hZd : directed (⊇) Z, from directed_of_mono Z Zmono,
have ∀ i, Z i ⊆ Z 0, from assume i, Zmono $ zero_le i,
have hZc : ∀ i, compact (Z i), from assume i, compact_of_is_closed_subset hZ0 (hZcl i) (this i),
compact.nonempty_Inter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed Z hZd hZn hZc hZcl
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
lemma compact.elim_finite_subcover_image {s : set α} {b : set β} {c : β → set α}
(hs : compact s) (hc₁ : ∀i∈b, is_open (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃i∈b, c i) :
∃b'⊆b, finite b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃i∈b', c i :=
begin
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (λ i, c i.1 : b → set α) _ _ with ⟨d, hd⟩,
refine ⟨↑(d.image subtype.val), _, finset.finite_to_set _, _⟩,
{ intros i hi,
erw finset.mem_image at hi,
rcases hi with ⟨s, hsd, rfl⟩,
exact s.property },
{ refine subset.trans hd _,
rintros x ⟨_, ⟨s, rfl⟩, ⟨_, ⟨hsd, rfl⟩, H⟩⟩,
refine ⟨c s.val, ⟨s.val, _⟩, H⟩,
simp [finset.mem_image_of_mem subtype.val hsd] },
{ rintro ⟨i, hi⟩, exact hc₁ i hi },
{ refine subset.trans hc₂ _,
rintros x ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, ⟨_, ⟨hib, rfl⟩, H⟩⟩,
exact ⟨_, ⟨⟨i, hib⟩, rfl⟩, H⟩ },
end
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed {s : set α}
(h : Π {ι : Type u} (Z : ι → (set α)), (∀ i, is_closed (Z i)) →
s ∩ (⋂ i, Z i) = ∅ → (∃ (t : finset ι), s ∩ (⋂ i ∈ t, Z i) = ∅)) :
compact s :=
assume f hfn hfs, classical.by_contradiction $ assume : ¬ (∃x∈s, f ⊓ 𝓝 x ≠ ⊥),
have hf : ∀x∈s, 𝓝 x ⊓ f = ⊥,
by simpa only [not_exists, not_not, inf_comm],
have ¬ ∃x∈s, ∀t∈f.sets, x ∈ closure t,
from assume ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩,
have ∅ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f, by rw [empty_in_sets_eq_bot, hf x hxs],
let ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, ht⟩ := by rw [mem_inf_sets] at this; exact this in
have ∅ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ principal t₂,
from (𝓝 x ⊓ principal t₂).sets_of_superset (inter_mem_inf_sets ht₁ (subset.refl t₂)) ht,
have 𝓝 x ⊓ principal t₂ = ⊥,
by rwa [empty_in_sets_eq_bot] at this,
by simp only [closure_eq_nhds] at hx; exact hx t₂ ht₂ this,
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := h (λ i : f.sets, closure i.1) (λ i, is_closed_closure)
(by simpa [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, not_exists]) in
have (⋂i∈t, subtype.val i) ∈ f,
from Inter_mem_sets t.finite_to_set $ assume i hi, i.2,
have s ∩ (⋂i∈t, subtype.val i) ∈ f,
from inter_mem_sets (le_principal_iff.1 hfs) this,
have ∅ ∈ f,
from mem_sets_of_superset this $ assume x ⟨hxs, hx⟩,
let ⟨i, hit, hxi⟩ := (show ∃i ∈ t, x ∉ closure (subtype.val i),
by { rw [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem] at ht, simpa [hxs, not_forall] using ht x }) in
have x ∈ closure i.val, from subset_closure (mem_bInter_iff.mp hx i hit),
show false, from hxi this,
hfn $ by rwa [empty_in_sets_eq_bot] at this
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
lemma compact_of_finite_subcover {s : set α}
(h : Π {ι : Type u} (U : ι → (set α)), (∀ i, is_open (U i)) →
s ⊆ (⋃ i, U i) → (∃ (t : finset ι), s ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ t, U i))) :
compact s :=
compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed $
assume ι Z hZc hsZ,
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := h (λ i, - Z i) (assume i, is_open_compl_iff.mpr $ hZc i)
(by simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, set.mem_Union,
exists_prop, set.mem_inter_eq, not_and, iff_self, set.mem_Inter, set.mem_compl_eq] using hsZ)
in
⟨t, by simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, set.mem_Union,
exists_prop, set.mem_inter_eq, not_and, iff_self, set.mem_Inter, set.mem_compl_eq] using ht⟩
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
lemma compact_iff_finite_subcover {s : set α} :
compact s ↔ (Π {ι : Type u} (U : ι → (set α)), (∀ i, is_open (U i)) →
s ⊆ (⋃ i, U i) → (∃ (t : finset ι), s ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ t, U i))) :=
⟨assume hs ι, hs.elim_finite_subcover, compact_of_finite_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem compact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed {s : set α} :
compact s ↔ (Π {ι : Type u} (Z : ι → (set α)), (∀ i, is_closed (Z i)) →
s ∩ (⋂ i, Z i) = ∅ → (∃ (t : finset ι), s ∩ (⋂ i ∈ t, Z i) = ∅)) :=
⟨assume hs ι, hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed, compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed⟩
@[simp]
lemma compact_empty : compact (∅ : set α) :=
assume f hnf hsf, not.elim hnf $
empty_in_sets_eq_bot.1 $ le_principal_iff.1 hsf
@[simp]
lemma compact_singleton {a : α} : compact ({a} : set α) :=
compact_of_finite_subcover $ assume ι U hUo hsU,
let ⟨i, hai⟩ := (show ∃i : ι, a ∈ U i, from mem_Union.1 $ singleton_subset_iff.1 hsU) in
⟨{i}, singleton_subset_iff.2 (by simpa only [finset.bUnion_singleton])⟩
lemma set.finite.compact_bUnion {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : finite s)
(hf : ∀i ∈ s, compact (f i)) :
compact (⋃i ∈ s, f i) :=
compact_of_finite_subcover $ assume ι U hUo hsU,
have ∀i : subtype s, ∃t : finset ι, f i ⊆ (⋃ j ∈ t, U j), from
assume ⟨i, hi⟩, (hf i hi).elim_finite_subcover _ hUo
(calc f i ⊆ ⋃i ∈ s, f i : subset_bUnion_of_mem hi
... ⊆ ⋃j, U j : hsU),
let ⟨finite_subcovers, h⟩ := axiom_of_choice this in
by haveI : fintype (subtype s) := hs.fintype; exact
let t := finset.bind finset.univ finite_subcovers in
have (⋃i ∈ s, f i) ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ t, U i), from bUnion_subset $
assume i hi, calc
f i ⊆ (⋃ j ∈ finite_subcovers ⟨i, hi⟩, U j) : (h ⟨i, hi⟩)
... ⊆ (⋃ j ∈ t, U j) : bUnion_subset_bUnion_left $
assume j hj, finset.mem_bind.mpr ⟨_, finset.mem_univ _, hj⟩,
⟨t, this⟩
lemma compact_Union {f : β → set α} [fintype β]
(h : ∀i, compact (f i)) : compact (⋃i, f i) :=
by rw ← bUnion_univ; exact finite_univ.compact_bUnion (λ i _, h i)
lemma set.finite.compact {s : set α} (hs : finite s) : compact s :=
bUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.compact_bUnion (λ _ _, compact_singleton)
lemma compact.union {s t : set α} (hs : compact s) (ht : compact t) : compact (s ∪ t) :=
by rw union_eq_Union; exact compact_Union (λ b, by cases b; assumption)
section tube_lemma
variables [topological_space β]
/-- `nhds_contain_boxes s t` means that any open neighborhood of `s × t` in `α × β` includes
a product of an open neighborhood of `s` by an open neighborhood of `t`. -/
def nhds_contain_boxes (s : set α) (t : set β) : Prop :=
∀ (n : set (α × β)) (hn : is_open n) (hp : set.prod s t ⊆ n),
∃ (u : set α) (v : set β), is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ set.prod u v ⊆ n
lemma nhds_contain_boxes.symm {s : set α} {t : set β} :
nhds_contain_boxes s t → nhds_contain_boxes t s :=
assume H n hn hp,
let ⟨u, v, uo, vo, su, tv, p⟩ :=
H (prod.swap ⁻¹' n)
(continuous_swap n hn)
(by rwa [←image_subset_iff, prod.swap, image_swap_prod]) in
⟨v, u, vo, uo, tv, su,
by rwa [←image_subset_iff, prod.swap, image_swap_prod] at p⟩
lemma nhds_contain_boxes.comm {s : set α} {t : set β} :
nhds_contain_boxes s t ↔ nhds_contain_boxes t s :=
iff.intro nhds_contain_boxes.symm nhds_contain_boxes.symm
lemma nhds_contain_boxes_of_singleton {x : α} {y : β} :
nhds_contain_boxes ({x} : set α) ({y} : set β) :=
assume n hn hp,
let ⟨u, v, uo, vo, xu, yv, hp'⟩ :=
is_open_prod_iff.mp hn x y (hp $ by simp) in
⟨u, v, uo, vo, by simpa, by simpa, hp'⟩
lemma nhds_contain_boxes_of_compact {s : set α} (hs : compact s) (t : set β)
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, nhds_contain_boxes ({x} : set α) t) : nhds_contain_boxes s t :=
assume n hn hp,
have ∀x : subtype s, ∃uv : set α × set β,
is_open uv.1 ∧ is_open uv.2 ∧ {↑x} ⊆ uv.1 ∧ t ⊆ uv.2 ∧ set.prod uv.1 uv.2 ⊆ n,
from assume ⟨x, hx⟩,
have set.prod {x} t ⊆ n, from
subset.trans (prod_mono (by simpa) (subset.refl _)) hp,
let ⟨ux,vx,H1⟩ := H x hx n hn this in ⟨⟨ux,vx⟩,H1⟩,
let ⟨uvs, h⟩ := classical.axiom_of_choice this in
have us_cover : s ⊆ ⋃i, (uvs i).1, from
assume x hx, set.subset_Union _ ⟨x,hx⟩ (by simpa using (h ⟨x,hx⟩).2.2.1),
let ⟨s0, s0_cover⟩ :=
hs.elim_finite_subcover _ (λi, (h i).1) us_cover in
let u := ⋃(i ∈ s0), (uvs i).1 in
let v := ⋂(i ∈ s0), (uvs i).2 in
have is_open u, from is_open_bUnion (λi _, (h i).1),
have is_open v, from is_open_bInter s0.finite_to_set (λi _, (h i).2.1),
have t ⊆ v, from subset_bInter (λi _, (h i).2.2.2.1),
have set.prod u v ⊆ n, from assume ⟨x',y'⟩ ⟨hx',hy'⟩,
have ∃i ∈ s0, x' ∈ (uvs i).1, by simpa using hx',
let ⟨i,is0,hi⟩ := this in
(h i).2.2.2.2 ⟨hi, (bInter_subset_of_mem is0 : v ⊆ (uvs i).2) hy'⟩,
⟨u, v, ‹is_open u›, ‹is_open v›, s0_cover, ‹t ⊆ v›, ‹set.prod u v ⊆ n›⟩
lemma generalized_tube_lemma {s : set α} (hs : compact s) {t : set β} (ht : compact t)
{n : set (α × β)} (hn : is_open n) (hp : set.prod s t ⊆ n) :
∃ (u : set α) (v : set β), is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ set.prod u v ⊆ n :=
have _, from
nhds_contain_boxes_of_compact hs t $ assume x _, nhds_contain_boxes.symm $
nhds_contain_boxes_of_compact ht {x} $ assume y _, nhds_contain_boxes_of_singleton,
this n hn hp
end tube_lemma
/-- Type class for compact spaces. Separation is sometimes included in the definition, especially
in the French literature, but we do not include it here. -/
class compact_space (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(compact_univ : compact (univ : set α))
lemma compact_univ [h : compact_space α] : compact (univ : set α) := h.compact_univ
lemma cluster_point_of_compact [compact_space α]
{f : filter α} (h : f ≠ ⊥) : ∃ x, f ⊓ 𝓝 x ≠ ⊥ :=
by simpa using compact_univ f h (by simpa using f.univ_sets)
theorem compact_space_of_finite_subfamily_closed {α : Type u} [topological_space α]
(h : Π {ι : Type u} (Z : ι → (set α)), (∀ i, is_closed (Z i)) →
(⋂ i, Z i) = ∅ → (∃ (t : finset ι), (⋂ i ∈ t, Z i) = ∅)) :
compact_space α :=
{ compact_univ :=
begin
apply compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed,
intros ι Z, specialize h Z,
simpa using h
end }
lemma is_closed.compact [compact_space α] {s : set α} (h : is_closed s) :
compact s :=
compact_of_is_closed_subset compact_univ h (subset_univ _)
variables [topological_space β]
lemma compact.image_of_continuous_on {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hs : compact s)
(hf : continuous_on f s) : compact (f '' s) :=
begin
intros l lne ls,
have ne_bot : l.comap f ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥,
from comap_inf_principal_ne_bot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls),
rcases hs (l.comap f ⊓ principal s) ne_bot inf_le_right with ⟨a, has, ha⟩,
use [f a, mem_image_of_mem f has],
rw [inf_assoc, @inf_comm _ _ _ (𝓝 a)] at ha,
exact ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot (@@map_ne_bot f ha) (tendsto_comap.inf $ hf a has)
end
lemma compact.image {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hs : compact s) (hf : continuous f) :
compact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuous_on hf.continuous_on
lemma compact_range [compact_space α] {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) :
compact (range f) :=
by rw ← image_univ; exact compact_univ.image hf
local notation `𝓟` := principal
/-- If X is compact then pr₂ : X × Y → Y is a closed map -/
theorem is_closed_proj_of_compact
{X : Type*} [topological_space X] [compact_space X]
{Y : Type*} [topological_space Y] :
is_closed_map (prod.snd : X × Y → Y) :=
begin
set πX := (prod.fst : X × Y → X),
set πY := (prod.snd : X × Y → Y),
assume C (hC : is_closed C),
rw is_closed_iff_nhds at hC ⊢,
assume y (y_closure : 𝓝 y ⊓ 𝓟 (πY '' C) ≠ ⊥),
have : map πX (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C) ≠ ⊥,
{ suffices : map πY (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C) ≠ ⊥,
from map_ne_bot (λ h, this $ by rw h ; exact map_bot ),
calc map πY (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C) =
𝓝 y ⊓ map πY (𝓟 C) : filter.push_pull' _ _ _
... = 𝓝 y ⊓ 𝓟 (πY '' C) : by rw map_principal
... ≠ ⊥ : y_closure },
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, map πX (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C) ⊓ 𝓝 x ≠ ⊥,
from cluster_point_of_compact this,
refine ⟨⟨x, y⟩, _, by simp [πY]⟩,
apply hC,
rw ← filter.map_ne_bot_iff πX,
calc map πX (𝓝 (x, y) ⊓ 𝓟 C)
= map πX (comap πX (𝓝 x) ⊓ comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C) : by rw [nhds_prod_eq, filter.prod]
... = map πX (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C ⊓ comap πX (𝓝 x)) : by ac_refl
... = map πX (comap πY (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓟 C) ⊓ 𝓝 x : by rw filter.push_pull
... ≠ ⊥ : hx,
end
lemma embedding.compact_iff_compact_image {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : embedding f) :
compact s ↔ compact (f '' s) :=
iff.intro (assume h, h.image hf.continuous) $ assume h, begin
rw compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds at ⊢ h,
intros u hu us',
let u' : filter β := map f u,
have : u' ≤ principal (f '' s), begin
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_principal], convert us',
exact preimage_image_eq _ hf.inj
end,
rcases h u' (ultrafilter_map hu) this with ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, ⟨⟩⟩, _⟩,
refine ⟨a, ha, _⟩,
rwa [hf.induced, nhds_induced, ←map_le_iff_le_comap]
end
lemma compact_iff_compact_in_subtype {p : α → Prop} {s : set {a // p a}} :
compact s ↔ compact (subtype.val '' s) :=
embedding_subtype_val.compact_iff_compact_image
lemma compact_iff_compact_univ {s : set α} : compact s ↔ compact (univ : set (subtype s)) :=
by rw [compact_iff_compact_in_subtype, image_univ, subtype.val_range]; refl
lemma compact_iff_compact_space {s : set α} : compact s ↔ compact_space s :=
compact_iff_compact_univ.trans ⟨λ h, ⟨h⟩, @compact_space.compact_univ _ _⟩
lemma compact.prod {s : set α} {t : set β} (hs : compact s) (ht : compact t) : compact (set.prod s t) :=
begin
rw compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds at hs ht ⊢,
intros f hf hfs,
rw le_principal_iff at hfs,
rcases hs (map prod.fst f) (ultrafilter_map hf)
(le_principal_iff.2 (mem_map_sets_iff.2
⟨_, hfs, image_subset_iff.2 (λ s h, h.1)⟩)) with ⟨a, sa, ha⟩,
rcases ht (map prod.snd f) (ultrafilter_map hf)
(le_principal_iff.2 (mem_map_sets_iff.2
⟨_, hfs, image_subset_iff.2 (λ s h, h.2)⟩)) with ⟨b, tb, hb⟩,
rw map_le_iff_le_comap at ha hb,
refine ⟨⟨a, b⟩, ⟨sa, tb⟩, _⟩,
rw nhds_prod_eq, exact le_inf ha hb
end
/-- Finite topological spaces are compact. -/
@[priority 100] instance fintype.compact_space [fintype α] : compact_space α :=
{ compact_univ := set.finite_univ.compact }
/-- The product of two compact spaces is compact. -/
instance [compact_space α] [compact_space β] : compact_space (α × β) :=
⟨by { rw ← univ_prod_univ, exact compact_univ.prod compact_univ }⟩
/-- The disjoint union of two compact spaces is compact. -/
instance [compact_space α] [compact_space β] : compact_space (α ⊕ β) :=
⟨begin
rw ← range_inl_union_range_inr,
exact (compact_range continuous_inl).union (compact_range continuous_inr)
end⟩
section tychonoff
variables {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀i, topological_space (π i)]
/-- Tychonoff's theorem -/
lemma compact_pi_infinite {s : Πi:ι, set (π i)} :
(∀i, compact (s i)) → compact {x : Πi:ι, π i | ∀i, x i ∈ s i} :=
begin
simp [compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, nhds_pi],
exact assume h f hf hfs,
let p : Πi:ι, filter (π i) := λi, map (λx:Πi:ι, π i, x i) f in
have ∀i:ι, ∃a, a∈s i ∧ p i ≤ 𝓝 a,
from assume i, h i (p i) (ultrafilter_map hf) $
show (λx:Πi:ι, π i, x i) ⁻¹' s i ∈ f.sets,
from mem_sets_of_superset hfs $ assume x (hx : ∀i, x i ∈ s i), hx i,
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := classical.axiom_of_choice this in
⟨a, assume i, (ha i).left, assume i, map_le_iff_le_comap.mp $ (ha i).right⟩
end
instance pi.compact [∀i:ι, compact_space (π i)] : compact_space (Πi, π i) :=
⟨begin
have A : compact {x : Πi:ι, π i | ∀i, x i ∈ (univ : set (π i))} :=
compact_pi_infinite (λi, compact_univ),
have : {x : Πi:ι, π i | ∀i, x i ∈ (univ : set (π i))} = univ := by ext; simp,
rwa this at A,
end⟩
end tychonoff
instance quot.compact_space {r : α → α → Prop} [compact_space α] :
compact_space (quot r) :=
⟨by { rw ← range_quot_mk, exact compact_range continuous_quot_mk }⟩
instance quotient.compact_space {s : setoid α} [compact_space α] :
compact_space (quotient s) :=
quot.compact_space
/-- There are various definitions of "locally compact space" in the literature, which agree for
Hausdorff spaces but not in general. This one is the precise condition on X needed for the
evaluation `map C(X, Y) × X → Y` to be continuous for all `Y` when `C(X, Y)` is given the
compact-open topology. -/
class locally_compact_space (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(local_compact_nhds : ∀ (x : α) (n ∈ 𝓝 x), ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, s ⊆ n ∧ compact s)
end compact
section clopen
/-- A set is clopen if it is both open and closed. -/
def is_clopen (s : set α) : Prop :=
is_open s ∧ is_closed s
theorem is_clopen_union {s t : set α} (hs : is_clopen s) (ht : is_clopen t) : is_clopen (s ∪ t) :=
⟨is_open_union hs.1 ht.1, is_closed_union hs.2 ht.2⟩
theorem is_clopen_inter {s t : set α} (hs : is_clopen s) (ht : is_clopen t) : is_clopen (s ∩ t) :=
⟨is_open_inter hs.1 ht.1, is_closed_inter hs.2 ht.2⟩
@[simp] theorem is_clopen_empty : is_clopen (∅ : set α) :=
⟨is_open_empty, is_closed_empty⟩
@[simp] theorem is_clopen_univ : is_clopen (univ : set α) :=
⟨is_open_univ, is_closed_univ⟩
theorem is_clopen_compl {s : set α} (hs : is_clopen s) : is_clopen (-s) :=
⟨hs.2, is_closed_compl_iff.2 hs.1⟩
@[simp] theorem is_clopen_compl_iff {s : set α} : is_clopen (-s) ↔ is_clopen s :=
⟨λ h, compl_compl s ▸ is_clopen_compl h, is_clopen_compl⟩
theorem is_clopen_diff {s t : set α} (hs : is_clopen s) (ht : is_clopen t) : is_clopen (s-t) :=
is_clopen_inter hs (is_clopen_compl ht)
end clopen
section preirreducible
/-- A preirreducible set `s` is one where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens on `s`. -/
def is_preirreducible (s : set α) : Prop :=
∀ (u v : set α), is_open u → is_open v →
(s ∩ u).nonempty → (s ∩ v).nonempty → (s ∩ (u ∩ v)).nonempty
/-- An irreducible set `s` is one that is nonempty and
where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens on `s`. -/
def is_irreducible (s : set α) : Prop :=
s.nonempty ∧ is_preirreducible s
lemma is_irreducible.nonempty {s : set α} (h : is_irreducible s) :
s.nonempty := h.1
lemma is_irreducible.is_preirreducible {s : set α} (h : is_irreducible s) :
is_preirreducible s := h.2
theorem is_preirreducible_empty : is_preirreducible (∅ : set α) :=
λ _ _ _ _ _ ⟨x, h1, h2⟩, h1.elim
theorem is_irreducible_singleton {x} : is_irreducible ({x} : set α) :=
⟨singleton_nonempty x,
λ u v _ _ ⟨y, h1, h2⟩ ⟨z, h3, h4⟩, by rw mem_singleton_iff at h1 h3;
substs y z; exact ⟨x, rfl, h2, h4⟩⟩
theorem is_preirreducible.closure {s : set α} (H : is_preirreducible s) :
is_preirreducible (closure s) :=
λ u v hu hv ⟨y, hycs, hyu⟩ ⟨z, hzcs, hzv⟩,
let ⟨p, hpu, hps⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 hycs u hu hyu in
let ⟨q, hqv, hqs⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 hzcs v hv hzv in
let ⟨r, hrs, hruv⟩ := H u v hu hv ⟨p, hps, hpu⟩ ⟨q, hqs, hqv⟩ in
⟨r, subset_closure hrs, hruv⟩
lemma is_irreducible.closure {s : set α} (h : is_irreducible s) :
is_irreducible (closure s) :=
⟨h.nonempty.closure, h.is_preirreducible.closure⟩
theorem exists_preirreducible (s : set α) (H : is_preirreducible s) :
∃ t : set α, is_preirreducible t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ u, is_preirreducible u → t ⊆ u → u = t :=
let ⟨m, hm, hsm, hmm⟩ := zorn.zorn_subset₀ {t : set α | is_preirreducible t}
(λ c hc hcc hcn, let ⟨t, htc⟩ := hcn in
⟨⋃₀ c, λ u v hu hv ⟨y, hy, hyu⟩ ⟨z, hz, hzv⟩,
let ⟨p, hpc, hyp⟩ := mem_sUnion.1 hy,
⟨q, hqc, hzq⟩ := mem_sUnion.1 hz in
or.cases_on (zorn.chain.total hcc hpc hqc)
(assume hpq : p ⊆ q, let ⟨x, hxp, hxuv⟩ := hc hqc u v hu hv
⟨y, hpq hyp, hyu⟩ ⟨z, hzq, hzv⟩ in
⟨x, mem_sUnion_of_mem hxp hqc, hxuv⟩)
(assume hqp : q ⊆ p, let ⟨x, hxp, hxuv⟩ := hc hpc u v hu hv
⟨y, hyp, hyu⟩ ⟨z, hqp hzq, hzv⟩ in
⟨x, mem_sUnion_of_mem hxp hpc, hxuv⟩),
λ x hxc, set.subset_sUnion_of_mem hxc⟩) s H in
⟨m, hm, hsm, λ u hu hmu, hmm _ hu hmu⟩
/-- A maximal irreducible set that contains a given point. -/
def irreducible_component (x : α) : set α :=
classical.some (exists_preirreducible {x} is_irreducible_singleton.is_preirreducible)
lemma irreducible_component_property (x : α) :
is_preirreducible (irreducible_component x) ∧ {x} ⊆ (irreducible_component x) ∧
∀ u, is_preirreducible u → (irreducible_component x) ⊆ u → u = (irreducible_component x) :=
classical.some_spec (exists_preirreducible {x} is_irreducible_singleton.is_preirreducible)
theorem mem_irreducible_component {x : α} : x ∈ irreducible_component x :=
singleton_subset_iff.1 (irreducible_component_property x).2.1
theorem is_irreducible_irreducible_component {x : α} : is_irreducible (irreducible_component x) :=
⟨⟨x, mem_irreducible_component⟩, (irreducible_component_property x).1⟩
theorem eq_irreducible_component {x : α} :
∀ {s : set α}, is_preirreducible s → irreducible_component x ⊆ s → s = irreducible_component x :=
(irreducible_component_property x).2.2
theorem is_closed_irreducible_component {x : α} :
is_closed (irreducible_component x) :=
closure_eq_iff_is_closed.1 $ eq_irreducible_component
is_irreducible_irreducible_component.is_preirreducible.closure
subset_closure
/-- A preirreducible space is one where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens. -/
class preirreducible_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(is_preirreducible_univ [] : is_preirreducible (univ : set α))
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- An irreducible space is one that is nonempty
and where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens. -/
class irreducible_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] extends preirreducible_space α : Prop :=
(to_nonempty [] : nonempty α)
end prio
attribute [instance, priority 50] irreducible_space.to_nonempty -- see Note [lower instance priority]
theorem nonempty_preirreducible_inter [preirreducible_space α] {s t : set α} :
is_open s → is_open t → s.nonempty → t.nonempty → (s ∩ t).nonempty :=
by simpa only [univ_inter, univ_subset_iff] using
@preirreducible_space.is_preirreducible_univ α _ _ s t
theorem is_preirreducible.image [topological_space β] {s : set α} (H : is_preirreducible s)
(f : α → β) (hf : continuous_on f s) : is_preirreducible (f '' s) :=
begin
rintros u v hu hv ⟨_, ⟨⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, hxu⟩⟩ ⟨_, ⟨⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hyv⟩⟩,
rw ← set.mem_preimage at hxu hyv,
rcases continuous_on_iff'.1 hf u hu with ⟨u', hu', u'_eq⟩,
rcases continuous_on_iff'.1 hf v hv with ⟨v', hv', v'_eq⟩,
have := H u' v' hu' hv',
rw [set.inter_comm s u', ← u'_eq] at this,
rw [set.inter_comm s v', ← v'_eq] at this,
rcases this ⟨x, hxu, hx⟩ ⟨y, hyv, hy⟩ with ⟨z, hzs, hzu', hzv'⟩,
refine ⟨f z, mem_image_of_mem f hzs, _, _⟩,
all_goals
{ rw ← set.mem_preimage,
apply set.mem_of_mem_inter_left,
show z ∈ _ ∩ s,
simp [*] }
end
theorem is_irreducible.image [topological_space β] {s : set α} (H : is_irreducible s)
(f : α → β) (hf : continuous_on f s) : is_irreducible (f '' s) :=
⟨nonempty_image_iff.mpr H.nonempty, H.is_preirreducible.image f hf⟩
lemma subtype.preirreducible_space {s : set α} (h : is_preirreducible s) :
preirreducible_space s :=
{ is_preirreducible_univ :=
begin
intros u v hu hv hsu hsv,
rw is_open_induced_iff at hu hv,
rcases hu with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩,
rcases hv with ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩,
rcases hsu with ⟨⟨x, hxs⟩, hxs', hxu⟩,
rcases hsv with ⟨⟨y, hys⟩, hys', hyv⟩,
rcases h u v hu hv ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩ with ⟨z, hzs, ⟨hzu, hzv⟩⟩,
exact ⟨⟨z, hzs⟩, ⟨set.mem_univ _, ⟨hzu, hzv⟩⟩⟩
end }
lemma subtype.irreducible_space {s : set α} (h : is_irreducible s) :
irreducible_space s :=
{ is_preirreducible_univ :=
(subtype.preirreducible_space h.is_preirreducible).is_preirreducible_univ,
to_nonempty := h.nonempty.to_subtype }
/-- A set `s` is irreducible if and only if
for every finite collection of open sets all of whose members intersect `s`,
`s` also intersects the intersection of the entire collection
(i.e., there is an element of `s` contained in every member of the collection). -/
lemma is_irreducible_iff_sInter {s : set α} :
is_irreducible s ↔
∀ (U : finset (set α)) (hU : ∀ u ∈ U, is_open u) (H : ∀ u ∈ U, (s ∩ u).nonempty),
(s ∩ ⋂₀ ↑U).nonempty :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ intro U, apply finset.induction_on U,
{ intros, simpa using h.nonempty },
{ intros u U hu IH hU H,
rw [finset.coe_insert, sInter_insert],
apply h.2,
{ solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_self] },
{ apply is_open_sInter (finset.finite_to_set U),
intros, solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_of_mem] },
{ solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_self] },
{ apply IH,
all_goals { intros, solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_of_mem] } } } },
{ split,
{ simpa using h ∅ _ _; intro u; simp },
intros u v hu hv hu' hv',
simpa using h {u,v} _ _,
all_goals
{ intro t,
rw [finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton],
rintro (rfl|rfl); assumption } }
end
/-- A set is preirreducible if and only if
for every cover by two closed sets, it is contained in one of the two covering sets. -/
lemma is_preirreducible_iff_closed_union_closed {s : set α} :
is_preirreducible s ↔
∀ (z₁ z₂ : set α), is_closed z₁ → is_closed z₂ → s ⊆ z₁ ∪ z₂ → s ⊆ z₁ ∨ s ⊆ z₂ :=
begin
split,
all_goals
{ intros h t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂,
specialize h (-t₁) (-t₂),
simp only [is_open_compl_iff, is_closed_compl_iff] at h,
specialize h ht₁ ht₂ },
{ contrapose!, simp only [not_subset],
rintro ⟨⟨x, hx, hx'⟩, ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩⟩,
rcases h ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩ with ⟨z, hz, hz'⟩,
rw ← compl_union at hz',
exact ⟨z, hz, hz'⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩,
rw ← compl_inter at h,
delta set.nonempty,
rw imp_iff_not_or at h,
contrapose! h,
split,
{ intros z hz hz', exact h z ⟨hz, hz'⟩ },
{ split; intro H; refine H _ ‹_›; assumption } }
end
/-- A set is irreducible if and only if
for every cover by a finite collection of closed sets,
it is contained in one of the members of the collection. -/
lemma is_irreducible_iff_sUnion_closed {s : set α} :
is_irreducible s ↔
∀ (Z : finset (set α)) (hZ : ∀ z ∈ Z, is_closed z) (H : s ⊆ ⋃₀ ↑Z),
∃ z ∈ Z, s ⊆ z :=
begin
rw [is_irreducible, is_preirreducible_iff_closed_union_closed],
split; intro h,
{ intro Z, apply finset.induction_on Z,
{ intros, rw [finset.coe_empty, sUnion_empty] at H,
rcases h.1 with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exfalso, tauto },
{ intros z Z hz IH hZ H,
cases h.2 z (⋃₀ ↑Z) _ _ _
with h' h',
{ exact ⟨z, finset.mem_insert_self _ _, h'⟩ },
{ rcases IH _ h' with ⟨z', hz', hsz'⟩,
{ exact ⟨z', finset.mem_insert_of_mem hz', hsz'⟩ },
{ intros, solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_of_mem] } },
{ solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_self] },
{ rw sUnion_eq_bUnion,
apply is_closed_bUnion (finset.finite_to_set Z),
{ intros, solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_of_mem] } },
{ simpa using H } } },
{ split,
{ by_contradiction hs,
simpa using h ∅ _ _,
{ intro z, simp },
{ simpa [set.nonempty] using hs } },
intros z₁ z₂ hz₁ hz₂ H,
have := h {z₁, z₂} _ _,
simp only [exists_prop, finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton] at this,
{ rcases this with ⟨z, rfl|rfl, hz⟩; tauto },
{ intro t,
rw [finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton],
rintro (rfl|rfl); assumption },
{ simpa using H } }
end
end preirreducible
section preconnected
/-- A preconnected set is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def is_preconnected (s : set α) : Prop :=
∀ (u v : set α), is_open u → is_open v → s ⊆ u ∪ v →
(s ∩ u).nonempty → (s ∩ v).nonempty → (s ∩ (u ∩ v)).nonempty
/-- A connected set is one that is nonempty and where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def is_connected (s : set α) : Prop :=
s.nonempty ∧ is_preconnected s
lemma is_connected.nonempty {s : set α} (h : is_connected s) :
s.nonempty := h.1
lemma is_connected.is_preconnected {s : set α} (h : is_connected s) :
is_preconnected s := h.2
theorem is_preirreducible.is_preconnected {s : set α} (H : is_preirreducible s) : is_preconnected s :=
λ _ _ hu hv _, H _ _ hu hv
theorem is_irreducible.is_connected {s : set α} (H : is_irreducible s) : is_connected s :=
⟨H.nonempty, H.is_preirreducible.is_preconnected⟩
theorem is_preconnected_empty : is_preconnected (∅ : set α) :=
is_preirreducible_empty.is_preconnected
theorem is_connected_singleton {x} : is_connected ({x} : set α) :=
is_irreducible_singleton.is_connected
/-- If any point of a set is joined to a fixed point by a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem is_preconnected_of_forall {s : set α} (x : α)
(H : ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t ⊆ s, x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ is_preconnected t) :
is_preconnected s :=
begin
rintros u v hu hv hs ⟨z, zs, zu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩,
have xs : x ∈ s, by { rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, yt, ht⟩, exact ts xt },
wlog xu : x ∈ u := hs xs using [u v y z, v u z y],
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, yt, ht⟩,
have := ht u v hu hv(subset.trans ts hs) ⟨x, xt, xu⟩ ⟨y, yt, yv⟩,
exact this.imp (λ z hz, ⟨ts hz.1, hz.2⟩)
end
/-- If any two points of a set are contained in a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem is_preconnected_of_forall_pair {s : set α}
(H : ∀ x y ∈ s, ∃ t ⊆ s, x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ is_preconnected t) :
is_preconnected s :=
begin
rintros u v hu hv hs ⟨x, xs, xu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩,
rcases H x y xs ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, yt, ht⟩,
have := ht u v hu hv(subset.trans ts hs) ⟨x, xt, xu⟩ ⟨y, yt, yv⟩,
exact this.imp (λ z hz, ⟨ts hz.1, hz.2⟩)
end
/-- A union of a family of preconnected sets with a common point is preconnected as well. -/
theorem is_preconnected_sUnion (x : α) (c : set (set α)) (H1 : ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s)
(H2 : ∀ s ∈ c, is_preconnected s) : is_preconnected (⋃₀ c) :=
begin
apply is_preconnected_of_forall x,
rintros y ⟨s, sc, ys⟩,
exact ⟨s, subset_sUnion_of_mem sc, H1 s sc, ys, H2 s sc⟩
end
theorem is_preconnected.union (x : α) {s t : set α} (H1 : x ∈ s) (H2 : x ∈ t)
(H3 : is_preconnected s) (H4 : is_preconnected t) : is_preconnected (s ∪ t) :=
sUnion_pair s t ▸ is_preconnected_sUnion x {s, t}
(by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h); assumption)
(by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h); assumption)
theorem is_connected.union {s t : set α} (H : (s ∩ t).nonempty)
(Hs : is_connected s) (Ht : is_connected t) : is_connected (s ∪ t) :=
begin
rcases H with ⟨x, hx⟩,
refine ⟨⟨x, mem_union_left t (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx)⟩, _⟩,
exact is_preconnected.union x (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx) (mem_of_mem_inter_right hx)
Hs.is_preconnected Ht.is_preconnected
end
theorem is_preconnected.closure {s : set α} (H : is_preconnected s) :
is_preconnected (closure s) :=
λ u v hu hv hcsuv ⟨y, hycs, hyu⟩ ⟨z, hzcs, hzv⟩,
let ⟨p, hpu, hps⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 hycs u hu hyu in
let ⟨q, hqv, hqs⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 hzcs v hv hzv in
let ⟨r, hrs, hruv⟩ := H u v hu hv (subset.trans subset_closure hcsuv) ⟨p, hps, hpu⟩ ⟨q, hqs, hqv⟩ in
⟨r, subset_closure hrs, hruv⟩
theorem is_connected.closure {s : set α} (H : is_connected s) :
is_connected (closure s) :=
⟨H.nonempty.closure, H.is_preconnected.closure⟩
theorem is_preconnected.image [topological_space β] {s : set α} (H : is_preconnected s)
(f : α → β) (hf : continuous_on f s) : is_preconnected (f '' s) :=
begin
-- Unfold/destruct definitions in hypotheses
rintros u v hu hv huv ⟨_, ⟨x, xs, rfl⟩, xu⟩ ⟨_, ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩, yv⟩,
rcases continuous_on_iff'.1 hf u hu with ⟨u', hu', u'_eq⟩,
rcases continuous_on_iff'.1 hf v hv with ⟨v', hv', v'_eq⟩,
-- Reformulate `huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v` in terms of `u'` and `v'`
replace huv : s ⊆ u' ∪ v',
{ rw [image_subset_iff, preimage_union] at huv,
replace huv := subset_inter huv (subset.refl _),
rw [inter_distrib_right, u'_eq, v'_eq, ← inter_distrib_right] at huv,
exact (subset_inter_iff.1 huv).1 },
-- Now `s ⊆ u' ∪ v'`, so we can apply `‹is_preconnected s›`
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ : (s ∩ (u' ∩ v')).nonempty,
{ refine H u' v' hu' hv' huv ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩; rw inter_comm,
exacts [u'_eq ▸ ⟨xu, xs⟩, v'_eq ▸ ⟨yv, ys⟩] },
rw [← inter_self s, inter_assoc, inter_left_comm s u', ← inter_assoc,
inter_comm s, inter_comm s, ← u'_eq, ← v'_eq] at hz,
exact ⟨f z, ⟨z, hz.1.2, rfl⟩, hz.1.1, hz.2.1⟩
end
theorem is_connected.image [topological_space β] {s : set α} (H : is_connected s)
(f : α → β) (hf : continuous_on f s) : is_connected (f '' s) :=
⟨nonempty_image_iff.mpr H.nonempty, H.is_preconnected.image f hf⟩
theorem is_preconnected_closed_iff {s : set α} :
is_preconnected s ↔ ∀ t t', is_closed t → is_closed t' → s ⊆ t ∪ t' →
(s ∩ t).nonempty → (s ∩ t').nonempty → (s ∩ (t ∩ t')).nonempty :=
⟨begin
rintros h t t' ht ht' htt' ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ ⟨y, ys, yt'⟩,
by_contradiction h',
rw [← ne_empty_iff_nonempty, ne.def, not_not, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint, compl_inter] at h',
have xt' : x ∉ t', from (h' xs).elim (absurd xt) id,
have yt : y ∉ t, from (h' ys).elim id (absurd yt'),
have := ne_empty_iff_nonempty.2 (h (-t) (-t') (is_open_compl_iff.2 ht)
(is_open_compl_iff.2 ht') h' ⟨y, ys, yt⟩ ⟨x, xs, xt'⟩),
rw [ne.def, ← compl_union, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint, compl_compl] at this,
contradiction
end,
begin
rintros h u v hu hv huv ⟨x, xs, xu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩,
by_contradiction h',
rw [← ne_empty_iff_nonempty, ne.def, not_not,
← subset_compl_iff_disjoint, compl_inter] at h',
have xv : x ∉ v, from (h' xs).elim (absurd xu) id,
have yu : y ∉ u, from (h' ys).elim id (absurd yv),
have := ne_empty_iff_nonempty.2 (h (-u) (-v) (is_closed_compl_iff.2 hu)
(is_closed_compl_iff.2 hv) h' ⟨y, ys, yu⟩ ⟨x, xs, xv⟩),
rw [ne.def, ← compl_union, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint, compl_compl] at this,
contradiction
end⟩
/-- The connected component of a point is the maximal connected set
that contains this point. -/
def connected_component (x : α) : set α :=
⋃₀ { s : set α | is_preconnected s ∧ x ∈ s }
theorem mem_connected_component {x : α} : x ∈ connected_component x :=
mem_sUnion_of_mem (mem_singleton x) ⟨is_connected_singleton.is_preconnected, mem_singleton x⟩
theorem is_connected_connected_component {x : α} : is_connected (connected_component x) :=
⟨⟨x, mem_connected_component⟩, is_preconnected_sUnion x _ (λ _, and.right) (λ _, and.left)⟩
theorem subset_connected_component {x : α} {s : set α} (H1 : is_preconnected s) (H2 : x ∈ s) :
s ⊆ connected_component x :=
λ z hz, mem_sUnion_of_mem hz ⟨H1, H2⟩
theorem is_closed_connected_component {x : α} :
is_closed (connected_component x) :=
closure_eq_iff_is_closed.1 $ subset.antisymm
(subset_connected_component
is_connected_connected_component.closure.is_preconnected
(subset_closure mem_connected_component))
subset_closure
theorem irreducible_component_subset_connected_component {x : α} :
irreducible_component x ⊆ connected_component x :=
subset_connected_component
is_irreducible_irreducible_component.is_connected.is_preconnected
mem_irreducible_component
/-- A preconnected space is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
class preconnected_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(is_preconnected_univ : is_preconnected (univ : set α))
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A connected space is a nonempty one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
class connected_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] extends preconnected_space α : Prop :=
(to_nonempty : nonempty α)
end prio
attribute [instance, priority 50] connected_space.to_nonempty -- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance preirreducible_space.preconnected_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α]
[preirreducible_space α] : preconnected_space α :=
⟨(preirreducible_space.is_preirreducible_univ α).is_preconnected⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance irreducible_space.connected_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α]
[irreducible_space α] : connected_space α :=
{ to_nonempty := irreducible_space.to_nonempty α }
theorem nonempty_inter [preconnected_space α] {s t : set α} :
is_open s → is_open t → s ∪ t = univ → s.nonempty → t.nonempty → (s ∩ t).nonempty :=
by simpa only [univ_inter, univ_subset_iff] using
@preconnected_space.is_preconnected_univ α _ _ s t
theorem is_clopen_iff [preconnected_space α] {s : set α} : is_clopen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = univ :=
⟨λ hs, classical.by_contradiction $ λ h,
have h1 : s ≠ ∅ ∧ -s ≠ ∅, from ⟨mt or.inl h,
mt (λ h2, or.inr $ (by rw [← compl_compl s, h2, compl_empty] : s = univ)) h⟩,
let ⟨_, h2, h3⟩ := nonempty_inter hs.1 hs.2 (union_compl_self s)
(ne_empty_iff_nonempty.1 h1.1) (ne_empty_iff_nonempty.1 h1.2) in
h3 h2,
by rintro (rfl | rfl); [exact is_clopen_empty, exact is_clopen_univ]⟩
lemma subtype.preconnected_space {s : set α} (h : is_preconnected s) :
preconnected_space s :=
{ is_preconnected_univ :=
begin
intros u v hu hv hs hsu hsv,
rw is_open_induced_iff at hu hv,
rcases hu with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩,
rcases hv with ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩,
rcases hsu with ⟨⟨x, hxs⟩, hxs', hxu⟩,
rcases hsv with ⟨⟨y, hys⟩, hys', hyv⟩,
rcases h u v hu hv _ ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩ with ⟨z, hzs, ⟨hzu, hzv⟩⟩,
exact ⟨⟨z, hzs⟩, ⟨set.mem_univ _, ⟨hzu, hzv⟩⟩⟩,
intros z hz,
rcases hs (set.mem_univ ⟨z, hz⟩) with hzu|hzv,
{ left, assumption },
{ right, assumption }
end }
lemma subtype.connected_space {s : set α} (h : is_connected s) :
connected_space s :=
{ is_preconnected_univ :=
(subtype.preconnected_space h.is_preconnected).is_preconnected_univ,
to_nonempty := h.nonempty.to_subtype }
/-- A set `s` is preconnected if and only if
for every cover by two open sets that are disjoint on `s`,
it is contained in one of the two covering sets. -/
lemma is_preconnected_iff_subset_of_disjoint {s : set α} :
is_preconnected s ↔
∀ (u v : set α) (hu : is_open u) (hv : is_open v) (hs : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (huv : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅),
s ⊆ u ∨ s ⊆ v :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ intros u v hu hv hs huv,
specialize h u v hu hv hs,
contrapose! huv,
rw ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
simp [not_subset] at huv,
rcases huv with ⟨⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩, ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩⟩,
have hxv : x ∈ v := classical.or_iff_not_imp_left.mp (hs hxs) hxu,
have hyu : y ∈ u := classical.or_iff_not_imp_right.mp (hs hys) hyv,
exact h ⟨y, hys, hyu⟩ ⟨x, hxs, hxv⟩ },
{ intros u v hu hv hs hsu hsv,
rw ← ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
intro H,
specialize h u v hu hv hs H,
contrapose H,
apply ne_empty_iff_nonempty.mpr,
cases h,
{ rcases hsv with ⟨x, hxs, hxv⟩, exact ⟨x, hxs, ⟨h hxs, hxv⟩⟩ },
{ rcases hsu with ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩, exact ⟨x, hxs, ⟨hxu, h hxs⟩⟩ } }
end
/-- A set `s` is connected if and only if
for every cover by a finite collection of open sets that are pairwise disjoint on `s`,
it is contained in one of the members of the collection. -/
lemma is_connected_iff_sUnion_disjoint_open {s : set α} :
is_connected s ↔
∀ (U : finset (set α)) (H : ∀ (u v : set α), u ∈ U → v ∈ U → (s ∩ (u ∩ v)).nonempty → u = v)
(hU : ∀ u ∈ U, is_open u) (hs : s ⊆ ⋃₀ ↑U),
∃ u ∈ U, s ⊆ u :=
begin
rw [is_connected, is_preconnected_iff_subset_of_disjoint],
split; intro h,
{ intro U, apply finset.induction_on U,
{ rcases h.left,
suffices : s ⊆ ∅ → false, { simpa },
intro, solve_by_elim },
{ intros u U hu IH hs hU H,
rw [finset.coe_insert, sUnion_insert] at H,
cases h.2 u (⋃₀ ↑U) _ _ H _ with hsu hsU,
{ exact ⟨u, finset.mem_insert_self _ _, hsu⟩ },
{ rcases IH _ _ hsU with ⟨v, hvU, hsv⟩,
{ exact ⟨v, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hvU, hsv⟩ },
{ intros, apply hs; solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_of_mem] },
{ intros, solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_of_mem] } },
{ solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_self] },
{ apply is_open_sUnion,
intros, solve_by_elim [finset.mem_insert_of_mem] },
{ apply eq_empty_of_subset_empty,
rintro x ⟨hxs, hxu, hxU⟩,
rw mem_sUnion at hxU,
rcases hxU with ⟨v, hvU, hxv⟩,
rcases hs u v (finset.mem_insert_self _ _) (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hvU) _ with rfl,
{ contradiction },
{ exact ⟨x, hxs, hxu, hxv⟩ } } } },
{ split,
{ rw ← ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
by_contradiction hs, push_neg at hs, subst hs,
simpa using h ∅ _ _ _; simp },
intros u v hu hv hs hsuv,
rcases h {u, v} _ _ _ with ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩,
{ rw [finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton] at ht,
rcases ht with rfl|rfl; tauto },
{ intros t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂ hst,
rw ← ne_empty_iff_nonempty at hst,
rw [finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton] at ht₁ ht₂,
rcases ht₁ with rfl|rfl; rcases ht₂ with rfl|rfl,
all_goals { refl <|> contradiction <|> skip },
rw inter_comm t₁ at hst, contradiction },
{ intro t,
rw [finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton],
rintro (rfl|rfl); assumption },
{ simpa using hs } }
end
end preconnected
section totally_disconnected
/-- A set is called totally disconnected if all of its connected components are singletons. -/
def is_totally_disconnected (s : set α) : Prop :=
∀ t, t ⊆ s → is_preconnected t → subsingleton t
theorem is_totally_disconnected_empty : is_totally_disconnected (∅ : set α) :=
λ t ht _, ⟨λ ⟨_, h⟩, (ht h).elim⟩
theorem is_totally_disconnected_singleton {x} : is_totally_disconnected ({x} : set α) :=
λ t ht _, ⟨λ ⟨p, hp⟩ ⟨q, hq⟩, subtype.eq $ show p = q,
from (eq_of_mem_singleton (ht hp)).symm ▸ (eq_of_mem_singleton (ht hq)).symm⟩
/-- A space is totally disconnected if all of its connected components are singletons. -/
class totally_disconnected_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(is_totally_disconnected_univ : is_totally_disconnected (univ : set α))
end totally_disconnected
section totally_separated
/-- A set `s` is called totally separated if any two points of this set can be separated
by two disjoint open sets covering `s`. -/
def is_totally_separated (s : set α) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → ∃ u v : set α, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧
x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ s ⊆ u ∪ v ∧ u ∩ v = ∅
theorem is_totally_separated_empty : is_totally_separated (∅ : set α) :=
λ x, false.elim
theorem is_totally_separated_singleton {x} : is_totally_separated ({x} : set α) :=
λ p hp q hq hpq, (hpq $ (eq_of_mem_singleton hp).symm ▸ (eq_of_mem_singleton hq).symm).elim
theorem is_totally_disconnected_of_is_totally_separated {s : set α}
(H : is_totally_separated s) : is_totally_disconnected s :=
λ t hts ht, ⟨λ ⟨x, hxt⟩ ⟨y, hyt⟩, subtype.eq $ classical.by_contradiction $
assume hxy : x ≠ y, let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, hxu, hyv, hsuv, huv⟩ := H x (hts hxt) y (hts hyt) hxy in
let ⟨r, hrt, hruv⟩ := ht u v hu hv (subset.trans hts hsuv) ⟨x, hxt, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hyt, hyv⟩ in
(ext_iff.1 huv r).1 hruv⟩
/-- A space is totally separated if any two points can be separated by two disjoint open sets
covering the whole space. -/
class totally_separated_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(is_totally_separated_univ [] : is_totally_separated (univ : set α))
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance totally_separated_space.totally_disconnected_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α]
[totally_separated_space α] : totally_disconnected_space α :=
⟨is_totally_disconnected_of_is_totally_separated $ totally_separated_space.is_totally_separated_univ α⟩
end totally_separated
|
a9323d8a3f9bee9e5172055c83d02a114f44ebfe | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/ring_theory/witt_vector/structure_polynomial.lean | 884a059a1e176cbd02d70bfb1f6523f0d748d189 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,892 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.data.matrix.notation
import Mathlib.field_theory.mv_polynomial
import Mathlib.field_theory.finite.polynomial
import Mathlib.number_theory.basic
import Mathlib.ring_theory.witt_vector.witt_polynomial
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_2 u_1
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Witt structure polynomials
In this file we prove the main theorem that makes the whole theory of Witt vectors work.
Briefly, consider a polynomial `Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ` over the integers,
with polynomials variables indexed by an arbitrary type `idx`.
Then there exists a unique family of polynomials `φ : ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) Φ`
such that for all `n : ℕ` we have (`witt_structure_int_exists_unique`)
```
bind₁ φ (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) = bind₁ (λ i, (rename (prod.mk i) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n))) Φ
```
In other words: evaluating the `n`-th Witt polynomial on the family `φ`
is the same as evaluating `Φ` on the (appropriately renamed) `n`-th Witt polynomials.
N.b.: As far as we know, these polynomials do not have a name in the literature,
so we have decided to call them the “Witt structure polynomials”. See `witt_structure_int`.
## Special cases
With the main result of this file in place, we apply it to certain special polynomials.
For example, by taking `Φ = X tt + X ff` resp. `Φ = X tt * X ff`
we obtain families of polynomials `witt_add` resp. `witt_mul`
(with type `ℕ → mv_polynomial (bool × ℕ) ℤ`) that will be used in later files to define the
addition and multiplication on the ring of Witt vectors.
## Outline of the proof
The proof of `witt_structure_int_exists_unique` is rather technical, and takes up most of this file.
We start by proving the analogous version for polynomials with rational coefficients,
instead of integer coefficients.
In this case, the solution is rather easy,
since the Witt polynomials form a faithful change of coordinates
in the polynomial ring `mv_polynomial ℕ ℚ`.
We therefore obtain a family of polynomials `witt_structure_rat Φ`
for every `Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ`.
If `Φ` has integer coefficients, then the polynomials `witt_structure_rat Φ n` do so as well.
Proving this claim is the essential core of this file, and culminates in
`map_witt_structure_int`, which proves that upon mapping the coefficients
of `witt_structure_int Φ n` from the integers to the rationals,
one obtains `witt_structure_rat Φ n`.
Ultimately, the proof of `map_witt_structure_int` relies on
```
dvd_sub_pow_of_dvd_sub {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {p : ℕ} {a b : R} :
(p : R) ∣ a - b → ∀ (k : ℕ), (p : R) ^ (k + 1) ∣ a ^ p ^ k - b ^ p ^ k
```
## Main results
* `witt_structure_rat Φ`: the family of polynomials `ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ`
associated with `Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ` and satisfying the property explained above.
* `witt_structure_rat_prop`: the proof that `witt_structure_rat` indeed satisfies the property.
* `witt_structure_int Φ`: the family of polynomials `ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ`
associated with `Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ` and satisfying the property explained above.
* `map_witt_structure_int`: the proof that the integral polynomials `with_structure_int Φ`
are equal to `witt_structure_rat Φ` when mapped to polynomials with rational coefficients.
* `witt_structure_int_prop`: the proof that `witt_structure_int` indeed satisfies the property.
* Five families of polynomials that will be used to define the ring structure
on the ring of Witt vectors:
- `witt_vector.witt_zero`
- `witt_vector.witt_one`
- `witt_vector.witt_add`
- `witt_vector.witt_mul`
- `witt_vector.witt_neg`
(We also define `witt_vector.witt_sub`, and later we will prove that it describes subtraction,
which is defined as `λ a b, a + -b`. See `witt_vector.sub_coeff` for this proof.)
-/
-- This lemma reduces a bundled morphism to a "mere" function,
-- and consequently the simplifier cannot use a lot of powerful simp-lemmas.
-- We disable this locally, and probably it should be disabled globally in mathlib.
/-- `witt_structure_rat Φ` is a family of polynomials `ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ`
that are uniquely characterised by the property that
```
bind₁ (witt_structure_rat p Φ) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n) =
bind₁ (λ i, (rename (prod.mk i) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n))) Φ
```
In other words: evaluating the `n`-th Witt polynomial on the family `witt_structure_rat Φ`
is the same as evaluating `Φ` on the (appropriately renamed) `n`-th Witt polynomials.
See `witt_structure_rat_prop` for this property,
and `witt_structure_rat_exists_unique` for the fact that `witt_structure_rat`
gives the unique family of polynomials with this property.
These polynomials turn out to have integral coefficients,
but it requires some effort to show this.
See `witt_structure_int` for the version with integral coefficients,
and `map_witt_structure_int` for the fact that it is equal to `witt_structure_rat`
when mapped to polynomials over the rationals. -/
def witt_structure_rat (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) : mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ :=
coe_fn
(mv_polynomial.bind₁
fun (k : ℕ) =>
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ fun (i : idx) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename (Prod.mk i)) (witt_polynomial p ℚ k)) Φ)
(X_in_terms_of_W p ℚ n)
theorem witt_structure_rat_prop (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) : coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ (witt_structure_rat p Φ)) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n) =
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ fun (i : idx) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename (Prod.mk i)) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n)) Φ := sorry
theorem witt_structure_rat_exists_unique (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) : exists_unique
fun (φ : ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ) =>
∀ (n : ℕ),
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ φ) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n) =
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ fun (i : idx) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename (Prod.mk i)) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n))
Φ := sorry
theorem witt_structure_rat_rec_aux (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) : witt_structure_rat p Φ n * coe_fn mv_polynomial.C (↑p ^ n) =
coe_fn
(mv_polynomial.bind₁ fun (b : idx) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename fun (i : ℕ) => (b, i)) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n))
Φ -
finset.sum (finset.range n) fun (i : ℕ) => coe_fn mv_polynomial.C (↑p ^ i) * witt_structure_rat p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i) := sorry
/-- Write `witt_structure_rat p φ n` in terms of `witt_structure_rat p φ i` for `i < n`. -/
theorem witt_structure_rat_rec (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) : witt_structure_rat p Φ n =
coe_fn mv_polynomial.C (1 / ↑p ^ n) *
(coe_fn
(mv_polynomial.bind₁
fun (b : idx) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename fun (i : ℕ) => (b, i)) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n))
Φ -
finset.sum (finset.range n)
fun (i : ℕ) => coe_fn mv_polynomial.C (↑p ^ i) * witt_structure_rat p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i)) := sorry
/-- `witt_structure_int Φ` is a family of polynomials `ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ`
that are uniquely characterised by the property that
```
bind₁ (witt_structure_int p Φ) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n) =
bind₁ (λ i, (rename (prod.mk i) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n))) Φ
```
In other words: evaluating the `n`-th Witt polynomial on the family `witt_structure_int Φ`
is the same as evaluating `Φ` on the (appropriately renamed) `n`-th Witt polynomials.
See `witt_structure_int_prop` for this property,
and `witt_structure_int_exists_unique` for the fact that `witt_structure_int`
gives the unique family of polynomials with this property. -/
def witt_structure_int (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) : mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ :=
finsupp.map_range rat.num sorry (witt_structure_rat p (coe_fn (mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ)) Φ) n)
theorem bind₁_rename_expand_witt_polynomial {p : ℕ} {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) (IH : ∀ (m : ℕ),
m < n + 1 →
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ)) (witt_structure_int p Φ m) =
witt_structure_rat p (coe_fn (mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ)) Φ) m) : coe_fn
(mv_polynomial.bind₁
fun (b : idx) =>
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename fun (i : ℕ) => (b, i)) (coe_fn (mv_polynomial.expand p) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n)))
Φ =
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ fun (i : ℕ) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.expand p) (witt_structure_int p Φ i))
(witt_polynomial p ℤ n) := sorry
theorem C_p_pow_dvd_bind₁_rename_witt_polynomial_sub_sum {p : ℕ} {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) (IH : ∀ (m : ℕ),
m < n →
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ)) (witt_structure_int p Φ m) =
witt_structure_rat p (coe_fn (mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ)) Φ) m) : coe_fn mv_polynomial.C ↑(p ^ n) ∣
coe_fn
(mv_polynomial.bind₁ fun (b : idx) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename fun (i : ℕ) => (b, i)) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n))
Φ -
finset.sum (finset.range n) fun (i : ℕ) => coe_fn mv_polynomial.C (↑p ^ i) * witt_structure_int p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i) := sorry
@[simp] theorem map_witt_structure_int (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) : coe_fn (mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ)) (witt_structure_int p Φ n) =
witt_structure_rat p (coe_fn (mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ)) Φ) n := sorry
theorem witt_structure_int_prop (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) : coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ (witt_structure_int p Φ)) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) =
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ fun (i : idx) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename (Prod.mk i)) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n)) Φ := sorry
theorem eq_witt_structure_int (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (φ : ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ) (h : ∀ (n : ℕ),
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ φ) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) =
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ fun (i : idx) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename (Prod.mk i)) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n)) Φ) : φ = witt_structure_int p Φ := sorry
theorem witt_structure_int_exists_unique (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) : exists_unique
fun (φ : ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ) =>
∀ (n : ℕ),
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ φ) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) =
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.bind₁ fun (i : idx) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename (Prod.mk i)) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n))
Φ :=
Exists.intro (witt_structure_int p Φ) { left := witt_structure_int_prop p Φ, right := eq_witt_structure_int p Φ }
theorem witt_structure_prop (p : ℕ) {R : Type u_1} {idx : Type u_2} [comm_ring R] [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) : coe_fn (mv_polynomial.aeval fun (i : ℕ) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom R)) (witt_structure_int p Φ i))
(witt_polynomial p ℤ n) =
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.aeval fun (i : idx) => coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename (Prod.mk i)) (witt_polynomial p R n)) Φ := sorry
theorem witt_structure_int_rename (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] {σ : Type u_1} (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (f : idx → σ) (n : ℕ) : witt_structure_int p (coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename f) Φ) n =
coe_fn (mv_polynomial.rename (prod.map f id)) (witt_structure_int p Φ n) := sorry
@[simp] theorem constant_coeff_witt_structure_rat_zero (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) : coe_fn mv_polynomial.constant_coeff (witt_structure_rat p Φ 0) = coe_fn mv_polynomial.constant_coeff Φ := sorry
theorem constant_coeff_witt_structure_rat (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) (h : coe_fn mv_polynomial.constant_coeff Φ = 0) (n : ℕ) : coe_fn mv_polynomial.constant_coeff (witt_structure_rat p Φ n) = 0 := sorry
@[simp] theorem constant_coeff_witt_structure_int_zero (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) : coe_fn mv_polynomial.constant_coeff (witt_structure_int p Φ 0) = coe_fn mv_polynomial.constant_coeff Φ := sorry
theorem constant_coeff_witt_structure_int (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (h : coe_fn mv_polynomial.constant_coeff Φ = 0) (n : ℕ) : coe_fn mv_polynomial.constant_coeff (witt_structure_int p Φ n) = 0 := sorry
-- we could relax the fintype on `idx`, but then we need to cast from finset to set.
-- for our applications `idx` is always finite.
theorem witt_structure_rat_vars (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] [fintype idx] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) : mv_polynomial.vars (witt_structure_rat p Φ n) ⊆ finset.product finset.univ (finset.range (n + 1)) := sorry
-- we could relax the fintype on `idx`, but then we need to cast from finset to set.
-- for our applications `idx` is always finite.
theorem witt_structure_int_vars (p : ℕ) {idx : Type u_2} [hp : fact (nat.prime p)] [fintype idx] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) : mv_polynomial.vars (witt_structure_int p Φ n) ⊆ finset.product finset.univ (finset.range (n + 1)) := sorry
|
b510e86f0d942c0d234da295f7c0ce4ab640ca6f | a6b711a4e8db20755026231f7ed529a9014b2b6d | /ZZ_IGNORE/RAW/type_and_set_theory.lean | 8bfd74b96452641c4d85ba9b83b449dc3dccc676 | [] | no_license | chaseboettner/cs-dm-1 | b67d4a7e86f56bce59d2af115503769749d423b2 | 80b35f2957ffaa45b8b7a4479a3570a2d6eb4db0 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,367,603,488 | 1,536,235,675,000 | 1,536,235,675,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,792 | lean | /- ** Logical Foundations of Mathematics ** -/
/-
Modern mathematics is axiomatic. It's logical. It is
"founded" on mutually consistent axioms and inference
rules.
There is however more than one way to establish the
logical foundations of mathematics.
The most widely used axiomatic foundation comprises a
set of axioms that describes what it means to be a set,
and everything else then builds on the concept of sets.
The resulting theory is called "set theory." Set theory
is the most widely accepted and used logical foundation
for everyday mathematics.
The natural numbers for example can be "formalized" as
sets. Zero is represented by the empty set; one by the
set that contains only the empty set; two by the set
that contains that set; and so forth.
The specific set theory foundation for ordinary
mathematics is known as Zermelo-Frankl Set Theory
with the Axiom of Choice (often abbreviated as ZFC).
The axioms of ZFC capture our "naïve" view of sets
as collections of elements. It took much time and
great care, however, to craft a set of axioms that
are not self-contradicting. The original formulation
of set theory turned out to be inconsistent!
(Does the set of all sets that do not contain
themselves contain itself? If it does, then it
doesn't, and if it doesn't then it does: a real
inconsistency! In fact it was this problem that
led mathematicians to a much more careful notion
of what it means to be a set, as captured by the
axioms of ZFC.
As another example of an inconsistency, there's
a word in the English language to describe words
that describe themselves: autological. The antonym
of autological is heterological. "Polysyllabic" is
autological, but "palindrome" is heterological.
Is the word "heterological" heterological? If the
word doesn't describe itself, then it is, but then
the word would describe itself. So, yeah, English
is inconsistent in this sense.)
The axioms of ZFC are somewhat technical; we will
not explore them in this class. What you might want
to remember is that if you want to prove even simple
mathematical proposition in a precise, fully formal
way using ZFC, it is a complex and messy affair.
In fact, it's so messy that most mathematicians trade
in rigorous but informal proofs. By informal
proofs we mean mathematical arguments written in a
stylized form of a natural language, such as English.
For example, a proof of 0 = 0 and 1 = 1 might read
like this: "To prove the proposition, which is a
conjunction, we need proofs of the two parts. The
first, 0 = 0, is proved by noting that equality is
a reflexive relation, and 1 = 1 is proved similarly.
Given that both conjuncts are so, then so is the
overall conjunction. So it is shown (QED in latin)."
Because machines aren't much good at figuring out what
natural language text means with mathematical precision,
it's nearly impossible today for computers to check that
purported informal proofs are correct. Proof checking
remains a demanding, mostly human, and social process.
When a mathematician claims to have produced a proof
of a theorem of potential significance, other experts
come together (often as reviewers for journals to which
mathematical purported proofs are generally submitted
for review and publication) to see if they can find
any errors in reasoning. They often do!
Such human proof checking has in some cases proved to
be nearly intractable. For example, in 2012, Shinichi
Mochizuki, a reclusive Japanse mathematician, quietly
posted to the web a 500-page "putative" proof of a
major mathematical conjecture (proposition for which
there is not yet a proof) in number theory and geometry.
If correct, it could revolutionize mathematics. Yet the
work is so complex and unusual that the mathematical
community even to this day has still been unable even
to comprehend the overall concept, not to mention
checking every last detail for subtle errors.
-/
/-
HOMEWORK: Read this article. https://www.sciencealert.com/nightmarish-500-page-math-proof-even-experts-can-t-understand-about-published-shinichi-mochizuki
-/
/-
An alternative foundation for mathematics (in particular
for what is called "constructive" mathematics) is available
in what is called "type theory." It's basically a different
(from ZFC) set of axioms and inference rules on which math
can be based. Not surprisingly, types, rather than sets, are
a fundamental building block of mathematics in type theory.
Sets can be modeled, but they are not built in.
From your high school math background, you probably
already have a reasonable intuition for sets as collections
of values. A type also defines a set of values, and each
value in that set has that type. But whereas a value can be
in many sets, in type theory a value has exactly one type.
Whenever you see a value, or an expression that reduces to
a value, in type theory, it thus makes sense to ask the
question, what is its type? Every well formed expression
and value in a type theory has exactly one type.
In Lean, we can ask the type of an expression (including
of a literal expression that directly denotes a value) by
using the check command. Hover your mouse over the #check
command. Note that ℕ is mathematical notation for "natural
number", the type of non-negative integers.
-/
-- The types of some literal expressions
#check 0
#check "Hello"
#check tt
-- defining a binding of an identifier to a value
def foo := 0
-- The type of a variable expression
#check foo
-- The types of some more complex expressions
#check 1 + foo
#check "Hello " ++ "Logic!"
#check tt && ff
/-
Without getting into complicated details, it will suffice
for now to say that proofs are much more tractable objects
in type theory than in set theory. Type theory has thus
emerged as an important framework for *automating* the
handling of logic in both mathematics and computer science.
For computer scientists, it is also the main foundation for
functional programming, the theory of programming languages,
and for formal verification of software correctness, which
is vitally important when ultra-high levels of confidence
in the correctness of code is required (e.g., for security).
This very tool and language that you're using now, the Lean
prover, is based on type theory. It's am example of what's
known in the business as a proof assistant. But you can just
think of it for now as a really cool tool in which you can
write both programs and logic, and that can help you to
construct "manageable" proofs. Through the magic of type
checking it then *automatically* determines whether a proof
is valid for a given proposition.
This technology holds the promise of eventually changing
the way that code is written and verified, and even the way
that mathematics work.
-/
|
b97861b1253d4b0eff92d12a78741316905c59f5 | 94096349332b0a0e223a22a3917c8f253cd39235 | /src/game/world1/level2.lean | 5d56394b7bd4d76c5b951e4b4654c7a74f16116f | [] | no_license | robertylewis/natural_number_game | 26156e10ef7b45248549915cc4d1ab3d8c3afc85 | b210c05cd627242f791db1ee3f365ee7829674c9 | refs/heads/master | 1,598,964,725,038 | 1,572,602,236,000 | 1,572,602,236,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,780 | lean | import mynat.mul -- hide
namespace mynat -- hide
/-
# World 1 : Tutorial world
## level 2: The rewrite (`rw`) tactic.
The rewrite tactic is the way to "substitute in" the value
of a variable. In general, if you have a hypothesis of the form `A = B`, and your
goal mentions the left hand side `A` somewhere, then
the `rewrite` tactic will replace the `A` in your goal with a `B`.
Below is a theorem which cannot be
proved using `refl` -- you need a rewrite first.
Delete the sorry and take a look in the top right box at what we have.
The variables $x$ and $y$ are natural numbers, and we have
a proof `h` that $y = x + 7$. Our goal
is to prove that $2y=2(x+7)$. This goal is obvious -- we just
substitute in $y = x+7$ and we're done. In Lean, we do
this substitution using the `rw` tactic. So start your proof with
`rw h,`
and then hit enter. **Don't forget the comma.**
Did you see what happened to the goal? The goal doesn't close,
but it *changes* from `⊢ 2 * y = 2 * (x + 7)` to `⊢ 2 * (x + 7) = 2 * (x + 7)`.
We can just close this goal with
`refl,`
by writing it on the line after `rw h,`. Don't forget the comma, hit
enter, and enjoy seeing the "Proof complete!" message in the
top right window. The other reason you'll know you're
done is that the bottom right window (the error window)
becomes empty.
-/
/- Lemma : no-side-bar
If $x$ and $y$ are natural numbers,
and $y=x+7$, then $2y=2(x+7)$.
-/
lemma example2 (x y z : mynat) (h : y = x + 7) : 2 * y = 2 * (x + 7) :=
begin [less_leaky]
rw h,
refl
end
/- Tactic : rw
The `rw` tactic is a way to do "substituting in".
If `h : A = B` is a hypothesis (i.e., a proof of `A = B`)
and your goal contains one or more `A`s, then `rw h`
will change them all to `B`'s. If you want to change
`B`s to `A`s instead, try `rw ←h` (get the arrow with `\l`).
### Example:
If it looks like this in the top right hand box:
```
x y : mynat
h : x = y + 3
⊢ 1 + x = y + 4
```
then
`rw h,`
will change the goal into `⊢ 1 + (y + 3) = y + 4`.
Note of course that this goal is still far from solved.
### Example:
You can rewrite a hypothesis as well.
For example, if your local context looks like this:
```
x y : mynat
h1 : x = y + 3
h2 : 2 * y = x
⊢ y = 3
```
then `rw h1 at h2` will turn `h2` into `h2 : 2 * y = y + 3`.
-/
/-
## Exploring your proof.
Click on `refl,` and then use the arrow keys to move
your cursor around the proof. Go up and down and note that
the goal changes -- indeed you can inspect Lean's "state" at each
line of the proof (the hypotheses, and the goal).
Try to figure out the exact place where the goal changes.
The comma tells Lean "I've finished writing this tactic now,
please process it." Lean ignores newlines, but pays great
attention to commas.
-/
end mynat -- hide |
5c3fb610fa9a21be54818e1873d2f94e75c17a8b | bb31430994044506fa42fd667e2d556327e18dfe | /src/order/prop_instances.lean | e27289e1d81534d314ae4a884ee558eb1eafd36d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sgouezel/mathlib | 0cb4e5335a2ba189fa7af96d83a377f83270e503 | 00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,527,483,042 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 119,598,202 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,517,348,647,000 | 1,517,348,646,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,807 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import order.disjoint
import order.with_bot
/-!
# The order on `Prop`
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Instances on `Prop` such as `distrib_lattice`, `bounded_order`, `linear_order`.
-/
/-- Propositions form a distributive lattice. -/
instance Prop.distrib_lattice : distrib_lattice Prop :=
{ sup := or,
le_sup_left := @or.inl,
le_sup_right := @or.inr,
sup_le := λ a b c, or.rec,
inf := and,
inf_le_left := @and.left,
inf_le_right := @and.right,
le_inf := λ a b c Hab Hac Ha, and.intro (Hab Ha) (Hac Ha),
le_sup_inf := λ a b c, or_and_distrib_left.2,
..Prop.partial_order }
/-- Propositions form a bounded order. -/
instance Prop.bounded_order : bounded_order Prop :=
{ top := true,
le_top := λ a Ha, true.intro,
bot := false,
bot_le := @false.elim }
lemma Prop.bot_eq_false : (⊥ : Prop) = false := rfl
lemma Prop.top_eq_true : (⊤ : Prop) = true := rfl
instance Prop.le_is_total : is_total Prop (≤) :=
⟨λ p q, by { change (p → q) ∨ (q → p), tauto! }⟩
noncomputable instance Prop.linear_order : linear_order Prop :=
by classical; exact lattice.to_linear_order Prop
@[simp] lemma sup_Prop_eq : (⊔) = (∨) := rfl
@[simp] lemma inf_Prop_eq : (⊓) = (∧) := rfl
namespace pi
variables {ι : Type*} {α' : ι → Type*} [Π i, partial_order (α' i)]
lemma disjoint_iff [Π i, order_bot (α' i)] {f g : Π i, α' i} :
disjoint f g ↔ ∀ i, disjoint (f i) (g i) :=
begin
split,
{ intros h i x hf hg,
refine (update_le_iff.mp $
-- this line doesn't work
h (update_le_iff.mpr ⟨hf, λ _ _, _⟩) (update_le_iff.mpr ⟨hg, λ _ _, _⟩)).1,
{ exact ⊥},
{ exact bot_le },
{ exact bot_le }, },
{ intros h x hf hg i,
apply h i (hf i) (hg i) },
end
lemma codisjoint_iff [Π i, order_top (α' i)] {f g : Π i, α' i} :
codisjoint f g ↔ ∀ i, codisjoint (f i) (g i) :=
@disjoint_iff _ (λ i, (α' i)ᵒᵈ) _ _ _ _
lemma is_compl_iff [Π i, bounded_order (α' i)] {f g : Π i, α' i} :
is_compl f g ↔ ∀ i, is_compl (f i) (g i) :=
by simp_rw [is_compl_iff, disjoint_iff, codisjoint_iff, forall_and_distrib]
end pi
@[simp] lemma Prop.disjoint_iff {P Q : Prop} : disjoint P Q ↔ ¬(P ∧ Q) := disjoint_iff_inf_le
@[simp] lemma Prop.codisjoint_iff {P Q : Prop} : codisjoint P Q ↔ P ∨ Q :=
codisjoint_iff_le_sup.trans $ forall_const _
@[simp] lemma Prop.is_compl_iff {P Q : Prop} : is_compl P Q ↔ ¬(P ↔ Q) :=
begin
rw [is_compl_iff, Prop.disjoint_iff, Prop.codisjoint_iff, not_iff],
tauto,
end
|
2252179fa72e70702d6dbe6fcbccce7bbb26d704 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /hott/init/ua.hlean | 5ece71c4c665c968aa5e5faa40427c90e85b928d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,969 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer, Floris van Doorn
Ported from Coq HoTT
-/
prelude
import .equiv
open eq equiv is_equiv
--Ensure that the types compared are in the same universe
section
universe variable l
variables {A B : Type.{l}}
definition is_equiv_cast_of_eq [constructor] (H : A = B) : is_equiv (cast H) :=
is_equiv_tr (λX, X) H
definition equiv_of_eq [constructor] (H : A = B) : A ≃ B :=
equiv.mk _ (is_equiv_cast_of_eq H)
definition equiv_of_eq_refl [reducible] [unfold_full] (A : Type)
: equiv_of_eq (refl A) = equiv.refl :=
idp
end
axiom univalence (A B : Type) : is_equiv (@equiv_of_eq A B)
attribute univalence [instance]
-- This is the version of univalence axiom we will probably use most often
definition ua [reducible] {A B : Type} : A ≃ B → A = B :=
equiv_of_eq⁻¹
definition eq_equiv_equiv (A B : Type) : (A = B) ≃ (A ≃ B) :=
equiv.mk equiv_of_eq _
definition equiv_of_eq_ua [reducible] {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) : equiv_of_eq (ua f) = f :=
right_inv equiv_of_eq f
definition cast_ua_fn {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) : cast (ua f) = f :=
ap to_fun (equiv_of_eq_ua f)
definition cast_ua {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) (a : A) : cast (ua f) a = f a :=
ap10 (cast_ua_fn f) a
definition ua_equiv_of_eq [reducible] {A B : Type} (p : A = B) : ua (equiv_of_eq p) = p :=
left_inv equiv_of_eq p
definition eq_of_equiv_lift {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) : A = lift B :=
ua (f ⬝e !equiv_lift)
namespace equiv
definition ua_refl (A : Type) : ua erfl = idpath A :=
eq_of_fn_eq_fn !eq_equiv_equiv (right_inv !eq_equiv_equiv erfl)
-- One consequence of UA is that we can transport along equivalencies of types
-- We can use this for calculation evironments
protected definition transport_of_equiv [subst] (P : Type → Type) {A B : Type} (H : A ≃ B)
: P A → P B :=
eq.transport P (ua H)
-- we can "recurse" on equivalences, by replacing them by (equiv_of_eq _)
definition rec_on_ua [recursor] {A B : Type} {P : A ≃ B → Type}
(f : A ≃ B) (H : Π(q : A = B), P (equiv_of_eq q)) : P f :=
right_inv equiv_of_eq f ▸ H (ua f)
-- a variant where we immediately recurse on the equality in the new goal
definition rec_on_ua_idp [recursor] {A : Type} {P : Π{B}, A ≃ B → Type} {B : Type}
(f : A ≃ B) (H : P equiv.refl) : P f :=
rec_on_ua f (λq, eq.rec_on q H)
-- a variant where (equiv_of_eq (ua f)) will be replaced by f in the new goal
definition rec_on_ua' {A B : Type} {P : A ≃ B → A = B → Type}
(f : A ≃ B) (H : Π(q : A = B), P (equiv_of_eq q) q) : P f (ua f) :=
right_inv equiv_of_eq f ▸ H (ua f)
-- a variant where we do both
definition rec_on_ua_idp' {A : Type} {P : Π{B}, A ≃ B → A = B → Type} {B : Type}
(f : A ≃ B) (H : P equiv.refl idp) : P f (ua f) :=
rec_on_ua' f (λq, eq.rec_on q H)
end equiv
|
470baf43cf419201171d50a7dd6fcbdc7e59d7f1 | 6e41ee3ac9b96e8980a16295cc21f131e731884f | /tests/lean/run/e6.lean | 167a4c5beebaccb2102b291cc8ae914f76c5ca93 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | EgbertRijke/lean | 3426cfa0e5b3d35d12fc3fd7318b35574cb67dc3 | 4f2e0c6d7fc9274d953cfa1c37ab2f3e799ab183 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,834,871,476 | 1,422,159,801,000 | 1,422,159,801,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 635 | lean | prelude
precedence `+`:65
namespace nat
constant nat : Type.{1}
constant add : nat → nat → nat
infixl + := add
end nat
namespace int
open nat (nat)
constant int : Type.{1}
constant add : int → int → int
infixl + := add
constant of_nat : nat → int
persistent attribute of_nat [coercion]
end int
open int
open nat
constants n m : nat
constants i j : int
check n + m
check i + j
check i + n
check i + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n +
n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n +
n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n +
n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n + n
|
24d4cc93dd34d40a6e65fcaa33d82f610ffd4f82 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/ring_theory/artinian.lean | dc54afeb8af1b9603f6fdf59a750f0e39a37b124 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,603 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import linear_algebra.basic
import linear_algebra.prod
import linear_algebra.pi
import data.set_like.fintype
import linear_algebra.linear_independent
import tactic.linarith
import algebra.algebra.basic
import ring_theory.noetherian
import ring_theory.jacobson_ideal
import ring_theory.nilpotent
import ring_theory.nakayama
/-!
# Artinian rings and modules
A module satisfying these equivalent conditions is said to be an *Artinian* R-module
if every decreasing chain of submodules is eventually constant, or equivalently,
if the relation `<` on submodules is well founded.
A ring is an *Artinian ring* if it is Artinian as a module over itself.
(Note that we do not assume yet that our rings are commutative,
so perhaps this should be called "left Artinian".
To avoid cumbersome names once we specialize to the commutative case,
we don't make this explicit in the declaration names.)
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a ring and let `M` and `P` be `R`-modules. Let `N` be an `R`-submodule of `M`.
* `is_artinian R M` is the proposition that `M` is a Artinian `R`-module. It is a class,
implemented as the predicate that the `<` relation on submodules is well founded.
## References
* [M. F. Atiyah and I. G. Macdonald, *Introduction to commutative algebra*][atiyah-macdonald]
* [samuel]
## Tags
Artinian, artinian, Artinian ring, Artinian module, artinian ring, artinian module
-/
open set
open_locale big_operators pointwise
/--
`is_artinian R M` is the proposition that `M` is an Artinian `R`-module,
implemented as the well-foundedness of submodule inclusion.
-/
class is_artinian (R M) [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] : Prop :=
(well_founded_submodule_lt [] : well_founded ((<) : submodule R M → submodule R M → Prop))
section
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} {P : Type*} {N : Type*}
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group P] [add_comm_group N]
variables [module R M] [module R P] [module R N]
open is_artinian
include R
theorem is_artinian_of_injective (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (h : function.injective f)
[is_artinian R P] : is_artinian R M :=
⟨subrelation.wf
(λ A B hAB, show A.map f < B.map f,
from submodule.map_strict_mono_of_injective h hAB)
(inv_image.wf (submodule.map f) (is_artinian.well_founded_submodule_lt R P))⟩
instance is_artinian_submodule' [is_artinian R M] (N : submodule R M) : is_artinian R N :=
is_artinian_of_injective N.subtype subtype.val_injective
lemma is_artinian_of_le {s t : submodule R M} [ht : is_artinian R t]
(h : s ≤ t) : is_artinian R s :=
is_artinian_of_injective (submodule.of_le h) (submodule.of_le_injective h)
variable (M)
theorem is_artinian_of_surjective (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (hf : function.surjective f)
[is_artinian R M] : is_artinian R P :=
⟨subrelation.wf
(λ A B hAB, show A.comap f < B.comap f,
from submodule.comap_strict_mono_of_surjective hf hAB)
(inv_image.wf (submodule.comap f) (is_artinian.well_founded_submodule_lt _ _))⟩
variable {M}
theorem is_artinian_of_linear_equiv (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P)
[is_artinian R M] : is_artinian R P :=
is_artinian_of_surjective _ f.to_linear_map f.to_equiv.surjective
theorem is_artinian_of_range_eq_ker
[is_artinian R M] [is_artinian R P]
(f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P)
(hf : function.injective f)
(hg : function.surjective g)
(h : f.range = g.ker) :
is_artinian R N :=
⟨well_founded_lt_exact_sequence
(is_artinian.well_founded_submodule_lt _ _)
(is_artinian.well_founded_submodule_lt _ _)
f.range
(submodule.map f)
(submodule.comap f)
(submodule.comap g)
(submodule.map g)
(submodule.gci_map_comap hf)
(submodule.gi_map_comap hg)
(by simp [submodule.map_comap_eq, inf_comm])
(by simp [submodule.comap_map_eq, h])⟩
instance is_artinian_prod [is_artinian R M]
[is_artinian R P] : is_artinian R (M × P) :=
is_artinian_of_range_eq_ker
(linear_map.inl R M P)
(linear_map.snd R M P)
linear_map.inl_injective
linear_map.snd_surjective
(linear_map.range_inl R M P)
@[instance, priority 100]
lemma is_artinian_of_fintype [fintype M] : is_artinian R M :=
⟨fintype.well_founded_of_trans_of_irrefl _⟩
local attribute [elab_as_eliminator] fintype.induction_empty_option
instance is_artinian_pi {R ι : Type*} [fintype ι] : Π {M : ι → Type*} [ring R]
[Π i, add_comm_group (M i)], by exactI Π [Π i, module R (M i)],
by exactI Π [∀ i, is_artinian R (M i)], is_artinian R (Π i, M i) :=
fintype.induction_empty_option
(begin
introsI α β e hα M _ _ _ _,
exact is_artinian_of_linear_equiv
(linear_equiv.Pi_congr_left R M e)
end)
(by { introsI M _ _ _ _, apply_instance })
(begin
introsI α _ ih M _ _ _ _,
exact is_artinian_of_linear_equiv
(linear_equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod R).symm,
end)
ι
/-- A version of `is_artinian_pi` for non-dependent functions. We need this instance because
sometimes Lean fails to apply the dependent version in non-dependent settings (e.g., it fails to
prove that `ι → ℝ` is finite dimensional over `ℝ`). -/
instance is_artinian_pi' {R ι M : Type*} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [fintype ι]
[is_artinian R M] : is_artinian R (ι → M) :=
is_artinian_pi
end
open is_artinian submodule function
section
variables {R M : Type*} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
theorem is_artinian_iff_well_founded :
is_artinian R M ↔ well_founded ((<) : submodule R M → submodule R M → Prop) :=
⟨λ h, h.1, is_artinian.mk⟩
variables {R M}
lemma is_artinian.finite_of_linear_independent [nontrivial R] [is_artinian R M]
{s : set M} (hs : linear_independent R (coe : s → M)) : s.finite :=
begin
refine classical.by_contradiction (λ hf, (rel_embedding.well_founded_iff_no_descending_seq.1
(well_founded_submodule_lt R M)).elim' _),
have f : ℕ ↪ s, from @infinite.nat_embedding s ⟨λ f, hf ⟨f⟩⟩,
have : ∀ n, (coe ∘ f) '' {m | n ≤ m} ⊆ s,
{ rintros n x ⟨y, hy₁, rfl⟩, exact (f y).2 },
have : ∀ a b : ℕ, a ≤ b ↔
span R ((coe ∘ f) '' {m | b ≤ m}) ≤ span R ((coe ∘ f) '' {m | a ≤ m}),
{ assume a b,
rw [span_le_span_iff hs (this b) (this a),
set.image_subset_image_iff (subtype.coe_injective.comp f.injective),
set.subset_def],
simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq],
exact ⟨λ hab x, le_trans hab, λ h, (h _ le_rfl)⟩ },
exact ⟨⟨λ n, span R ((coe ∘ f) '' {m | n ≤ m}),
λ x y, by simp [le_antisymm_iff, (this _ _).symm] {contextual := tt}⟩,
begin
intros a b,
conv_rhs { rw [gt, lt_iff_le_not_le, this, this, ← lt_iff_le_not_le] },
simp
end⟩
end
/-- A module is Artinian iff every nonempty set of submodules has a minimal submodule among them.
-/
theorem set_has_minimal_iff_artinian :
(∀ a : set $ submodule R M, a.nonempty → ∃ M' ∈ a, ∀ I ∈ a, I ≤ M' → I = M') ↔
is_artinian R M :=
by rw [is_artinian_iff_well_founded, well_founded.well_founded_iff_has_min']
theorem is_artinian.set_has_minimal [is_artinian R M] (a : set $ submodule R M) (ha : a.nonempty) :
∃ M' ∈ a, ∀ I ∈ a, I ≤ M' → I = M' :=
set_has_minimal_iff_artinian.mpr ‹_› a ha
/-- A module is Artinian iff every decreasing chain of submodules stabilizes. -/
theorem monotone_stabilizes_iff_artinian :
(∀ (f : ℕ →o (submodule R M)ᵒᵈ), ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → f n = f m)
↔ is_artinian R M :=
by rw [is_artinian_iff_well_founded];
exact (well_founded.monotone_chain_condition (submodule R M)ᵒᵈ).symm
theorem is_artinian.monotone_stabilizes [is_artinian R M] (f : ℕ →o (submodule R M)ᵒᵈ) :
∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → f n = f m :=
monotone_stabilizes_iff_artinian.mpr ‹_› f
/-- If `∀ I > J, P I` implies `P J`, then `P` holds for all submodules. -/
lemma is_artinian.induction [is_artinian R M] {P : submodule R M → Prop}
(hgt : ∀ I, (∀ J < I, P J) → P I) (I : submodule R M) : P I :=
well_founded.recursion (well_founded_submodule_lt R M) I hgt
/--
For any endomorphism of a Artinian module, there is some nontrivial iterate
with disjoint kernel and range.
-/
theorem is_artinian.exists_endomorphism_iterate_ker_sup_range_eq_top
[I : is_artinian R M] (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : ∃ n : ℕ, n ≠ 0 ∧ (f ^ n).ker ⊔ (f ^ n).range = ⊤ :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, w⟩ := monotone_stabilizes_iff_artinian.mpr I
(f.iterate_range.comp ⟨λ n, n+1, λ n m w, by linarith⟩),
specialize w ((n + 1) + n) (by linarith),
dsimp at w,
refine ⟨n + 1, nat.succ_ne_zero _, _⟩,
simp_rw [eq_top_iff', mem_sup],
intro x,
have : (f^(n + 1)) x ∈ (f ^ ((n + 1) + n + 1)).range,
{ rw ← w, exact mem_range_self _ },
rcases this with ⟨y, hy⟩,
use x - (f ^ (n+1)) y,
split,
{ rw [linear_map.mem_ker, linear_map.map_sub, ← hy, sub_eq_zero, pow_add],
simp [iterate_add_apply], },
{ use (f^ (n+1)) y,
simp }
end
/-- Any injective endomorphism of an Artinian module is surjective. -/
theorem is_artinian.surjective_of_injective_endomorphism [is_artinian R M]
(f : M →ₗ[R] M) (s : injective f) : surjective f :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, ne, w⟩ := is_artinian.exists_endomorphism_iterate_ker_sup_range_eq_top f,
rw [linear_map.ker_eq_bot.mpr (linear_map.iterate_injective s n), bot_sup_eq,
linear_map.range_eq_top] at w,
exact linear_map.surjective_of_iterate_surjective ne w,
end
/-- Any injective endomorphism of an Artinian module is bijective. -/
theorem is_artinian.bijective_of_injective_endomorphism [is_artinian R M]
(f : M →ₗ[R] M) (s : injective f) : bijective f :=
⟨s, is_artinian.surjective_of_injective_endomorphism f s⟩
/--
A sequence `f` of submodules of a artinian module,
with the supremum `f (n+1)` and the infinum of `f 0`, ..., `f n` being ⊤,
is eventually ⊤.
-/
lemma is_artinian.disjoint_partial_infs_eventually_top [I : is_artinian R M]
(f : ℕ → submodule R M) (h : ∀ n, disjoint
(partial_sups (order_dual.to_dual ∘ f) n) (order_dual.to_dual (f (n+1)))) :
∃ n : ℕ, ∀ m, n ≤ m → f m = ⊤ :=
begin
-- A little off-by-one cleanup first:
suffices t : ∃ n : ℕ, ∀ m, n ≤ m → order_dual.to_dual f (m+1) = ⊤,
{ obtain ⟨n, w⟩ := t,
use n+1,
rintros (_|m) p,
{ cases p, },
{ apply w,
exact nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp p }, },
obtain ⟨n, w⟩ := monotone_stabilizes_iff_artinian.mpr I (partial_sups (order_dual.to_dual ∘ f)),
exact ⟨n, (λ m p, eq_bot_of_disjoint_absorbs (h m)
((eq.symm (w (m + 1) (le_add_right p))).trans (w m p)))⟩
end
universe w
variables {N : Type w} [add_comm_group N] [module R N]
-- TODO: Prove this for artinian modules
-- /--
-- If `M ⊕ N` embeds into `M`, for `M` noetherian over `R`, then `N` is trivial.
-- -/
-- noncomputable def is_noetherian.equiv_punit_of_prod_injective [is_noetherian R M]
-- (f : M × N →ₗ[R] M) (i : injective f) : N ≃ₗ[R] punit.{w+1} :=
-- begin
-- apply nonempty.some,
-- obtain ⟨n, w⟩ := is_noetherian.disjoint_partial_sups_eventually_bot (f.tailing i)
-- (f.tailings_disjoint_tailing i),
-- specialize w n (le_refl n),
-- apply nonempty.intro,
-- refine (f.tailing_linear_equiv i n).symm.trans _,
-- rw w,
-- exact submodule.bot_equiv_punit,
-- end
end
/--
A ring is Artinian if it is Artinian as a module over itself.
-/
class is_artinian_ring (R) [ring R] extends is_artinian R R : Prop
theorem is_artinian_ring_iff {R} [ring R] : is_artinian_ring R ↔ is_artinian R R :=
⟨λ h, h.1, @is_artinian_ring.mk _ _⟩
theorem ring.is_artinian_of_zero_eq_one {R} [ring R] (h01 : (0 : R) = 1) : is_artinian_ring R :=
by haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h01;
haveI := fintype.of_subsingleton (0:R); split;
apply_instance
theorem is_artinian_of_submodule_of_artinian (R M) [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
(N : submodule R M) (h : is_artinian R M) : is_artinian R N :=
by apply_instance
theorem is_artinian_of_quotient_of_artinian (R) [ring R] (M) [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
(N : submodule R M) (h : is_artinian R M) : is_artinian R (M ⧸ N) :=
is_artinian_of_surjective M (submodule.mkq N) (submodule.quotient.mk_surjective N)
/-- If `M / S / R` is a scalar tower, and `M / R` is Artinian, then `M / S` is
also Artinian. -/
theorem is_artinian_of_tower (R) {S M} [comm_ring R] [ring S]
[add_comm_group M] [algebra R S] [module S M] [module R M] [is_scalar_tower R S M]
(h : is_artinian R M) : is_artinian S M :=
begin
rw is_artinian_iff_well_founded at h ⊢,
refine (submodule.restrict_scalars_embedding R S M).well_founded h
end
theorem is_artinian_of_fg_of_artinian {R M} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
(N : submodule R M) [is_artinian_ring R] (hN : N.fg) : is_artinian R N :=
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := hN in
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq M,
haveI := classical.dec_eq R,
letI : is_artinian R R := by apply_instance,
have : ∀ x ∈ s, x ∈ N, from λ x hx, hs ▸ submodule.subset_span hx,
refine @@is_artinian_of_surjective ((↑s : set M) → R) _ _ _ (pi.module _ _ _)
_ _ _ is_artinian_pi,
{ fapply linear_map.mk,
{ exact λ f, ⟨∑ i in s.attach, f i • i.1, N.sum_mem (λ c _, N.smul_mem _ $ this _ c.2)⟩ },
{ intros f g, apply subtype.eq,
change ∑ i in s.attach, (f i + g i) • _ = _,
simp only [add_smul, finset.sum_add_distrib], refl },
{ intros c f, apply subtype.eq,
change ∑ i in s.attach, (c • f i) • _ = _,
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_smul],
exact finset.smul_sum.symm } },
rintro ⟨n, hn⟩, change n ∈ N at hn,
rw [← hs, ← set.image_id ↑s, finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total] at hn,
rcases hn with ⟨l, hl1, hl2⟩,
refine ⟨λ x, l x, subtype.ext _⟩,
change ∑ i in s.attach, l i • (i : M) = n,
rw [@finset.sum_attach M M s _ (λ i, l i • i), ← hl2,
finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum, eq_comm],
refine finset.sum_subset hl1 (λ x _ hx, _),
rw [finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.1 hx, zero_smul]
end
lemma is_artinian_of_fg_of_artinian' {R M} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
[is_artinian_ring R] (h : (⊤ : submodule R M).fg) : is_artinian R M :=
have is_artinian R (⊤ : submodule R M), from is_artinian_of_fg_of_artinian _ h,
by exactI is_artinian_of_linear_equiv (linear_equiv.of_top (⊤ : submodule R M) rfl)
/-- In a module over a artinian ring, the submodule generated by finitely many vectors is
artinian. -/
theorem is_artinian_span_of_finite (R) {M} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
[is_artinian_ring R] {A : set M} (hA : finite A) : is_artinian R (submodule.span R A) :=
is_artinian_of_fg_of_artinian _ (submodule.fg_def.mpr ⟨A, hA, rfl⟩)
theorem is_artinian_ring_of_surjective (R) [ring R] (S) [ring S]
(f : R →+* S) (hf : function.surjective f)
[H : is_artinian_ring R] : is_artinian_ring S :=
begin
rw [is_artinian_ring_iff, is_artinian_iff_well_founded] at H ⊢,
exact order_embedding.well_founded (ideal.order_embedding_of_surjective f hf) H,
end
instance is_artinian_ring_range {R} [ring R] {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S)
[is_artinian_ring R] : is_artinian_ring f.range :=
is_artinian_ring_of_surjective R f.range f.range_restrict
f.range_restrict_surjective
theorem is_artinian_ring_of_ring_equiv (R) [ring R] {S} [ring S]
(f : R ≃+* S) [is_artinian_ring R] : is_artinian_ring S :=
is_artinian_ring_of_surjective R S f.to_ring_hom f.to_equiv.surjective
namespace is_artinian_ring
open is_artinian
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [is_artinian_ring R]
lemma is_nilpotent_jacobson_bot : is_nilpotent (ideal.jacobson (⊥ : ideal R)) :=
begin
let Jac := ideal.jacobson (⊥ : ideal R),
let f : ℕ →o (ideal R)ᵒᵈ := ⟨λ n, Jac ^ n, λ _ _ h, ideal.pow_le_pow h⟩,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → Jac ^ n = Jac ^ m := is_artinian.monotone_stabilizes f,
refine ⟨n, _⟩,
let J : ideal R := annihilator (Jac ^ n),
suffices : J = ⊤,
{ have hJ : J • Jac ^ n = ⊥ := annihilator_smul (Jac ^ n),
simpa only [this, top_smul, ideal.zero_eq_bot] using hJ },
by_contradiction hJ, change J ≠ ⊤ at hJ,
rcases is_artinian.set_has_minimal {J' : ideal R | J < J'} ⟨⊤, hJ.lt_top⟩
with ⟨J', hJJ' : J < J', hJ' : ∀ I, J < I → I ≤ J' → I = J'⟩,
rcases set_like.exists_of_lt hJJ' with ⟨x, hxJ', hxJ⟩,
obtain rfl : J ⊔ ideal.span {x} = J',
{ refine hJ' (J ⊔ ideal.span {x}) _ _,
{ rw set_like.lt_iff_le_and_exists,
exact ⟨le_sup_left, ⟨x, mem_sup_right (mem_span_singleton_self x), hxJ⟩⟩ },
{ exact (sup_le hJJ'.le (span_le.2 (singleton_subset_iff.2 hxJ'))) } },
have : J ⊔ Jac • ideal.span {x} ≤ J ⊔ ideal.span {x},
from sup_le_sup_left (smul_le.2 (λ _ _ _, submodule.smul_mem _ _)) _,
have : Jac * ideal.span {x} ≤ J, --Need version 4 of Nakayamas lemma on Stacks
{ classical, by_contradiction H,
refine H (smul_sup_le_of_le_smul_of_le_jacobson_bot
(fg_span_singleton _) le_rfl (hJ' _ _ this).ge),
exact lt_of_le_of_ne le_sup_left (λ h, H $ h.symm ▸ le_sup_right) },
have : ideal.span {x} * Jac ^ (n + 1) ≤ ⊥,
calc ideal.span {x} * Jac ^ (n + 1) = ideal.span {x} * Jac * Jac ^ n :
by rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc]
... ≤ J * Jac ^ n : mul_le_mul (by rwa mul_comm) le_rfl
... = ⊥ : by simp [J],
refine hxJ (mem_annihilator.2 (λ y hy, (mem_bot R).1 _)),
refine this (mul_mem_mul (mem_span_singleton_self x) _),
rwa [← hn (n + 1) (nat.le_succ _)]
end
end is_artinian_ring
|
9159579a224eed8edf69f992aeb8c6a2683e8c7c | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/linear_algebra/affine_space/affine_equiv.lean | 2e6f89d2306a32c16344e1b185dfcff45c7e2365 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,927 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import linear_algebra.affine_space.affine_map
import algebra.invertible
/-!
# Affine equivalences
In this file we define `affine_equiv k P₁ P₂` (notation: `P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂`) to be the type of affine
equivalences between `P₁` and `P₂, i.e., equivalences such that both forward and inverse maps are
affine maps.
We define the following equivalences:
* `affine_equiv.refl k P`: the identity map as an `affine_equiv`;
* `e.symm`: the inverse map of an `affine_equiv` as an `affine_equiv`;
* `e.trans e'`: composition of two `affine_equiv`s; note that the order follows `mathlib`'s
`category_theory` convention (apply `e`, then `e'`), not the convention used in function
composition and compositions of bundled morphisms.
## Tags
affine space, affine equivalence
-/
open function set
open_locale affine
/-- An affine equivalence is an equivalence between affine spaces such that both forward
and inverse maps are affine.
We define it using an `equiv` for the map and a `linear_equiv` for the linear part in order
to allow affine equivalences with good definitional equalities. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure affine_equiv (k P₁ P₂ : Type*) {V₁ V₂ : Type*} [ring k]
[add_comm_group V₁] [module k V₁] [add_torsor V₁ P₁]
[add_comm_group V₂] [module k V₂] [add_torsor V₂ P₂] extends P₁ ≃ P₂ :=
(linear : V₁ ≃ₗ[k] V₂)
(map_vadd' : ∀ (p : P₁) (v : V₁), to_equiv (v +ᵥ p) = linear v +ᵥ to_equiv p)
notation P₁ ` ≃ᵃ[`:25 k:25 `] `:0 P₂:0 := affine_equiv k P₁ P₂
instance (k : Type*) {V1 : Type*} (P1 : Type*) {V2 : Type*} (P2 : Type*)
[ring k]
[add_comm_group V1] [module k V1] [affine_space V1 P1]
[add_comm_group V2] [module k V2] [affine_space V2 P2] :
has_coe_to_fun (P1 ≃ᵃ[k] P2) :=
⟨_, λ e, e.to_fun⟩
variables {k V₁ V₂ V₃ V₄ P₁ P₂ P₃ P₄ : Type*} [ring k]
[add_comm_group V₁] [module k V₁] [add_torsor V₁ P₁]
[add_comm_group V₂] [module k V₂] [add_torsor V₂ P₂]
[add_comm_group V₃] [module k V₃] [add_torsor V₃ P₃]
[add_comm_group V₄] [module k V₄] [add_torsor V₄ P₄]
namespace linear_equiv
/-- Interpret a linear equivalence between modules as an affine equivalence. -/
def to_affine_equiv (e : V₁ ≃ₗ[k] V₂) : V₁ ≃ᵃ[k] V₂ :=
{ to_equiv := e.to_equiv,
linear := e,
map_vadd' := λ p v, e.map_add v p }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_affine_equiv (e : V₁ ≃ₗ[k] V₂) : ⇑e.to_affine_equiv = e := rfl
end linear_equiv
namespace affine_equiv
variables (k P₁)
include V₁
/-- Identity map as an `affine_equiv`. -/
@[refl] def refl : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₁ :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.refl P₁,
linear := linear_equiv.refl k V₁,
map_vadd' := λ _ _, rfl }
@[simp] lemma coe_refl : ⇑(refl k P₁) = id := rfl
lemma refl_apply (x : P₁) : refl k P₁ x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_equiv_refl : (refl k P₁).to_equiv = equiv.refl P₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma linear_refl : (refl k P₁).linear = linear_equiv.refl k V₁ := rfl
variables {k P₁}
include V₂
@[simp] lemma map_vadd (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (p : P₁) (v : V₁) : e (v +ᵥ p) = e.linear v +ᵥ e p :=
e.map_vadd' p v
@[simp] lemma coe_to_equiv (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : ⇑e.to_equiv = e := rfl
/-- Reinterpret an `affine_equiv` as an `affine_map`. -/
def to_affine_map (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂ := { to_fun := e, .. e }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_affine_map (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) :
(e.to_affine_map : P₁ → P₂) = (e : P₁ → P₂) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_affine_map_mk (f : P₁ ≃ P₂) (f' : V₁ ≃ₗ[k] V₂) (h) :
to_affine_map (mk f f' h) = ⟨f, f', h⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma linear_to_affine_map (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : e.to_affine_map.linear = e.linear := rfl
lemma to_affine_map_injective : injective (to_affine_map : (P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) → (P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂)) :=
begin
rintros ⟨e, el, h⟩ ⟨e', el', h'⟩ H,
simp only [to_affine_map_mk, equiv.coe_inj, linear_equiv.to_linear_map_inj] at H,
congr,
exacts [H.1, H.2]
end
@[simp] lemma to_affine_map_inj {e e' : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂} :
e.to_affine_map = e'.to_affine_map ↔ e = e' :=
to_affine_map_injective.eq_iff
@[ext] lemma ext {e e' : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂} (h : ∀ x, e x = e' x) : e = e' :=
to_affine_map_injective $ affine_map.ext h
lemma coe_fn_injective : injective (λ (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (x : P₁), e x) :=
λ e e' H, ext $ congr_fun H
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fn_inj {e e' : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂} : ⇑e = e' ↔ e = e' :=
coe_fn_injective.eq_iff
lemma to_equiv_injective : injective (to_equiv : (P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) → (P₁ ≃ P₂)) :=
λ e e' H, ext $ equiv.ext_iff.1 H
@[simp] lemma to_equiv_inj {e e' : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂} : e.to_equiv = e'.to_equiv ↔ e = e' :=
to_equiv_injective.eq_iff
/-- Construct an affine equivalence by verifying the relation between the map and its linear part at
one base point. Namely, this function takes an equivalence `e : P₁ ≃ P₂`, a linear equivalece
`e' : V₁ ≃ₗ[k] V₂`, and a point `p` such that for any other point `p'` we have
`e p' = e' (p' -ᵥ p) +ᵥ e p`. -/
def mk' (e : P₁ ≃ P₂) (e' : V₁ ≃ₗ[k] V₂) (p : P₁) (h : ∀ p' : P₁, e p' = e' (p' -ᵥ p) +ᵥ e p) :
P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂ :=
{ to_equiv := e,
linear := e',
.. affine_map.mk' e (e' : V₁ →ₗ[k] V₂) p h }
@[simp] lemma coe_mk' (e : P₁ ≃ P₂) (e' : V₁ ≃ₗ[k] V₂) (p h) : ⇑(mk' e e' p h) = e := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_equiv_mk' (e : P₁ ≃ P₂) (e' : V₁ ≃ₗ[k] V₂) (p h) :
(mk' e e' p h).to_equiv = e := rfl
@[simp] lemma linear_mk' (e : P₁ ≃ P₂) (e' : V₁ ≃ₗ[k] V₂) (p h) :
(mk' e e' p h).linear = e' := rfl
/-- Inverse of an affine equivalence as an affine equivalence. -/
@[symm] def symm (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : P₂ ≃ᵃ[k] P₁ :=
{ to_equiv := e.to_equiv.symm,
linear := e.linear.symm,
map_vadd' := λ v p, e.to_equiv.symm.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.2 $
by simpa using (e.to_equiv.apply_symm_apply v).symm }
@[simp] lemma symm_to_equiv (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : e.to_equiv.symm = e.symm.to_equiv := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_linear (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : e.linear.symm = e.symm.linear := rfl
protected lemma bijective (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : bijective e := e.to_equiv.bijective
protected lemma surjective (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : surjective e := e.to_equiv.surjective
protected lemma injective (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : injective e := e.to_equiv.injective
@[simp] lemma range_eq (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : range e = univ := e.surjective.range_eq
@[simp] lemma apply_symm_apply (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (p : P₂) : e (e.symm p) = p :=
e.to_equiv.apply_symm_apply p
@[simp] lemma symm_apply_apply (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (p : P₁) : e.symm (e p) = p :=
e.to_equiv.symm_apply_apply p
lemma apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) {p₁ p₂} : e p₁ = p₂ ↔ p₁ = e.symm p₂ :=
e.to_equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma apply_eq_iff_eq (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) {p₁ p₂ : P₁} : e p₁ = e p₂ ↔ p₁ = p₂ :=
e.to_equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq
omit V₂
@[simp] lemma symm_refl : (refl k P₁).symm = refl k P₁ := rfl
include V₂ V₃
/-- Composition of two `affine_equiv`alences, applied left to right. -/
@[trans] def trans (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (e' : P₂ ≃ᵃ[k] P₃) : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₃ :=
{ to_equiv := e.to_equiv.trans e'.to_equiv,
linear := e.linear.trans e'.linear,
map_vadd' := λ p v, by simp only [linear_equiv.trans_apply, coe_to_equiv, (∘),
equiv.coe_trans, map_vadd] }
@[simp] lemma coe_trans (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (e' : P₂ ≃ᵃ[k] P₃) : ⇑(e.trans e') = e' ∘ e := rfl
lemma trans_apply (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (e' : P₂ ≃ᵃ[k] P₃) (p : P₁) : e.trans e' p = e' (e p) := rfl
include V₄
lemma trans_assoc (e₁ : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (e₂ : P₂ ≃ᵃ[k] P₃) (e₃ : P₃ ≃ᵃ[k] P₄) :
(e₁.trans e₂).trans e₃ = e₁.trans (e₂.trans e₃) :=
ext $ λ _, rfl
omit V₃ V₄
@[simp] lemma trans_refl (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : e.trans (refl k P₂) = e :=
ext $ λ _, rfl
@[simp] lemma refl_trans (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : (refl k P₁).trans e = e :=
ext $ λ _, rfl
@[simp] lemma trans_symm (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : e.trans e.symm = refl k P₁ :=
ext e.symm_apply_apply
@[simp] lemma symm_trans (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) : e.symm.trans e = refl k P₂ :=
ext e.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma apply_line_map (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) (a b : P₁) (c : k) :
e (affine_map.line_map a b c) = affine_map.line_map (e a) (e b) c :=
e.to_affine_map.apply_line_map a b c
omit V₂
instance : group (P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₁) :=
{ one := refl k P₁,
mul := λ e e', e'.trans e,
inv := symm,
mul_assoc := λ e₁ e₂ e₃, trans_assoc _ _ _,
one_mul := trans_refl,
mul_one := refl_trans,
mul_left_inv := trans_symm }
lemma one_def : (1 : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₁) = refl k P₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ⇑(1 : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₁) = id := rfl
lemma mul_def (e e' : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₁) : e * e' = e'.trans e := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (e e' : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₁) : ⇑(e * e') = e ∘ e' := rfl
lemma inv_def (e : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₁) : e⁻¹ = e.symm := rfl
variable (k)
/-- The map `v ↦ v +ᵥ b` as an affine equivalence between a module `V` and an affine space `P` with
tangent space `V`. -/
def vadd_const (b : P₁) : V₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₁ :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.vadd_const b,
linear := linear_equiv.refl _ _,
map_vadd' := λ p v, add_vadd _ _ _ }
@[simp] lemma linear_vadd_const (b : P₁) : (vadd_const k b).linear = linear_equiv.refl k V₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma vadd_const_apply (b : P₁) (v : V₁) : vadd_const k b v = v +ᵥ b := rfl
@[simp] lemma vadd_const_symm_apply (b p : P₁) : (vadd_const k b).symm p = p -ᵥ b := rfl
/-- `p' ↦ p -ᵥ p'` as an equivalence. -/
def const_vsub (p : P₁) : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] V₁ :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.const_vsub p,
linear := linear_equiv.neg k,
map_vadd' := λ p' v, by simp [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, neg_add_eq_sub] }
@[simp] lemma coe_const_vsub (p : P₁) : ⇑(const_vsub k p) = (-ᵥ) p := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_const_vsub_symm (p : P₁) : ⇑(const_vsub k p).symm = λ v, -v +ᵥ p := rfl
variable (P₁)
/-- The map `p ↦ v +ᵥ p` as an affine automorphism of an affine space. -/
def const_vadd (v : V₁) : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₁ :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.const_vadd P₁ v,
linear := linear_equiv.refl _ _,
map_vadd' := λ p w, vadd_comm _ _ _ }
@[simp] lemma linear_const_vadd (v : V₁) : (const_vadd k P₁ v).linear = linear_equiv.refl _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma const_vadd_apply (v : V₁) (p : P₁) : const_vadd k P₁ v p = v +ᵥ p := rfl
@[simp] lemma const_vadd_symm_apply (v : V₁) (p : P₁) : (const_vadd k P₁ v).symm p = -v +ᵥ p := rfl
variable {P₁}
open function
/-- Point reflection in `x` as a permutation. -/
def point_reflection (x : P₁) : P₁ ≃ᵃ[k] P₁ := (const_vsub k x).trans (vadd_const k x)
lemma point_reflection_apply (x y : P₁) : point_reflection k x y = x -ᵥ y +ᵥ x := rfl
@[simp] lemma point_reflection_symm (x : P₁) : (point_reflection k x).symm = point_reflection k x :=
to_equiv_injective $ equiv.point_reflection_symm x
@[simp] lemma to_equiv_point_reflection (x : P₁) :
(point_reflection k x).to_equiv = equiv.point_reflection x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma point_reflection_self (x : P₁) : point_reflection k x x = x := vsub_vadd _ _
lemma point_reflection_involutive (x : P₁) : involutive (point_reflection k x : P₁ → P₁) :=
equiv.point_reflection_involutive x
/-- `x` is the only fixed point of `point_reflection x`. This lemma requires
`x + x = y + y ↔ x = y`. There is no typeclass to use here, so we add it as an explicit argument. -/
lemma point_reflection_fixed_iff_of_injective_bit0 {x y : P₁} (h : injective (bit0 : V₁ → V₁)) :
point_reflection k x y = y ↔ y = x :=
equiv.point_reflection_fixed_iff_of_injective_bit0 h
lemma injective_point_reflection_left_of_injective_bit0 (h : injective (bit0 : V₁ → V₁)) (y : P₁) :
injective (λ x : P₁, point_reflection k x y) :=
equiv.injective_point_reflection_left_of_injective_bit0 h y
lemma injective_point_reflection_left_of_module [invertible (2:k)]:
∀ y, injective (λ x : P₁, point_reflection k x y) :=
injective_point_reflection_left_of_injective_bit0 k $ λ x y h,
by rwa [bit0, bit0, ← two_smul k x, ← two_smul k y,
(is_unit_of_invertible (2:k)).smul_left_cancel] at h
lemma point_reflection_fixed_iff_of_module [invertible (2:k)] {x y : P₁} :
point_reflection k x y = y ↔ y = x :=
((injective_point_reflection_left_of_module k y).eq_iff' (point_reflection_self k y)).trans eq_comm
end affine_equiv
namespace affine_map
open affine_equiv
include V₁
lemma line_map_vadd (v v' : V₁) (p : P₁) (c : k) :
line_map v v' c +ᵥ p = line_map (v +ᵥ p) (v' +ᵥ p) c :=
(vadd_const k p).apply_line_map v v' c
lemma line_map_vsub (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P₁) (c : k) :
line_map p₁ p₂ c -ᵥ p₃ = line_map (p₁ -ᵥ p₃) (p₂ -ᵥ p₃) c :=
(vadd_const k p₃).symm.apply_line_map p₁ p₂ c
lemma vsub_line_map (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P₁) (c : k) :
p₁ -ᵥ line_map p₂ p₃ c = line_map (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₁ -ᵥ p₃) c :=
(const_vsub k p₁).apply_line_map p₂ p₃ c
lemma vadd_line_map (v : V₁) (p₁ p₂ : P₁) (c : k) :
v +ᵥ line_map p₁ p₂ c = line_map (v +ᵥ p₁) (v +ᵥ p₂) c :=
(const_vadd k P₁ v).apply_line_map p₁ p₂ c
variables {R' : Type*} [comm_ring R'] [module R' V₁]
lemma homothety_neg_one_apply (c p : P₁) :
homothety c (-1:R') p = point_reflection R' c p :=
by simp [homothety_apply, point_reflection_apply]
end affine_map
|
57bcd77a6ebe65f2a33c38ba69f9ba6fe0bfb426 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/matchUnifyBug.lean | 82aba9cf208dc4548e01252e06ed3ee6279f3bfe | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,078 | lean | inductive Color where
| Red
| Black
open Color
inductive rbnode : Nat → Color → Type where
| Leaf : rbnode 1 Black
| R {h}
(left : rbnode h Black)
(value : Int)
(right : rbnode h Black) : rbnode h Red
| B {h cl cr}
(left : rbnode h cl)
(value : Int)
(right : rbnode h cr) : rbnode (h+1) Black
open rbnode
inductive hiddenTree : Nat → Type
| HR {h} (node : rbnode h Red) : hiddenTree h
| HB {h} (node : rbnode (h+1) Black) : hiddenTree (h+1)
open hiddenTree
inductive almostNode : Nat → Type
| LR {h cR} (left:rbnode h Red) (value:Int) (right:rbnode h cR) : almostNode h
| RR {h cL} (left:rbnode h cL) (value:Int) (right:rbnode h Red) : almostNode h
| V {h c} (node:rbnode h c) : almostNode h
open almostNode
def balanceRR {h c} (left : rbnode h c) (y : Int) (right : hiddenTree h) : almostNode h :=
match h, c, left, right with
| _, _, left, HR c => RR left y c
| n+1, _, R a x b, HB c => LR (R a x b) y c
| _, _, B a x b, HB c => V (R (B a x b) y c)
| _, _, Leaf, HB c => V (R Leaf y c)
|
78695fa117ac2af36c12d4dbc515d9884a277556 | 022215fec0be87ac6243b0f4fa3cc2939361d7d0 | /src/category_theory/instances/Top/stalks.lean | 51481c58e02b1beec20a2df2f16c14e3e3ed9d1d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | PaulGustafson/mathlib | 4aa7bc81ca971fdd7b6e50bf3a245fade2978391 | c49ac06ff9fa1371e9b6050a121df618cfd3fb80 | refs/heads/master | 1,590,798,947,521 | 1,559,220,227,000 | 1,559,220,227,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,461 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Scott Morrison
import category_theory.instances.Top.open_nhds
import category_theory.instances.Top.presheaf
import category_theory.limits.limits
universes v u v' u'
open category_theory
open category_theory.instances
open category_theory.instances.Top
open category_theory.limits
open topological_space
variables {C : Type u} [𝒞 : category.{v+1} C]
include 𝒞
variables [has_colimits.{v} C]
variables {X Y Z : Top.{v}}
namespace category_theory.instances.Top.presheaf
variables (C)
/-- Stalks are functorial with respect to morphisms of presheaves over a fixed `X`. -/
def stalk_functor (x : X) : X.presheaf C ⥤ C :=
((whiskering_left _ _ C).obj (open_nhds.inclusion x).op) ⋙ colim
variables {C}
/--
The stalk of a presheaf `F` at a point `x` is calculated as the colimit of the functor
nbhds x ⥤ opens F.X ⥤ C
-/
def stalk (ℱ : X.presheaf C) (x : X) : C :=
(stalk_functor C x).obj ℱ -- -- colimit (nbhds_inclusion x ⋙ ℱ)
@[simp] lemma stalk_functor_obj (ℱ : X.presheaf C) (x : X) : (stalk_functor C x).obj ℱ = ℱ.stalk x := rfl
variables (C)
def stalk_pushforward (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : X.presheaf C) (x : X) : (f _* ℱ).stalk (f x) ⟶ ℱ.stalk x :=
begin
-- This is a hack; Lean doesn't like to elaborate the term written directly.
transitivity,
swap,
exact colimit.pre _ (open_nhds.map f x).op,
exact colim.map (whisker_right (nat_trans.op (open_nhds.inclusion_map_iso f x).inv) ℱ),
end
-- Here are two other potential solutions, suggested by @fpvandoorn at
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/1018#discussion_r283978240
-- However, I can't get the subsequent two proofs to work with either one.
-- def stalk_pushforward (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : X.presheaf C) (x : X) : (f _* ℱ).stalk (f x) ⟶ ℱ.stalk x :=
-- colim.map ((functor.associator _ _ _).inv ≫
-- whisker_right (nat_trans.op (open_nhds.inclusion_map_iso f x).inv) ℱ) ≫
-- colimit.pre ((open_nhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ ℱ) (open_nhds.map f x).op
-- def stalk_pushforward (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : X.presheaf C) (x : X) : (f _* ℱ).stalk (f x) ⟶ ℱ.stalk x :=
-- (colim.map (whisker_right (nat_trans.op (open_nhds.inclusion_map_iso f x).inv) ℱ) :
-- colim.obj ((open_nhds.inclusion (f x) ⋙ opens.map f).op ⋙ ℱ) ⟶ _) ≫
-- colimit.pre ((open_nhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ ℱ) (open_nhds.map f x).op
namespace stalk_pushforward
local attribute [tidy] tactic.op_induction'
@[simp] lemma id (ℱ : X.presheaf C) (x : X) :
ℱ.stalk_pushforward C (𝟙 X) x = (stalk_functor C x).map ((pushforward.id ℱ).hom) :=
begin
dsimp [stalk_pushforward, stalk_functor],
tidy,
end
@[simp] lemma comp (ℱ : X.presheaf C) (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x : X) :
ℱ.stalk_pushforward C (f ≫ g) x =
((f _* ℱ).stalk_pushforward C g (f x)) ≫ (ℱ.stalk_pushforward C f x) :=
begin
dsimp [stalk_pushforward, stalk_functor, pushforward],
ext U,
op_induction U,
cases U,
cases U_val,
simp only [colim.ι_map_assoc, colimit.ι_pre_assoc, colimit.ι_pre,
whisker_right.app, category.assoc],
dsimp,
simp only [category.id_comp, category_theory.functor.map_id],
-- FIXME A simp lemma which unfortunately doesn't fire:
rw [category_theory.functor.map_id],
dsimp,
simp,
end
end stalk_pushforward
end category_theory.instances.Top.presheaf
|
92172275676db44b39cf359e66166d696200c9b3 | 18425d4bab0b5e4677ef791d0065e16639493248 | /function/bijection.lean | 8c4577d5671d6c1226a0088376d61c2514f7644e | [
"MIT"
] | permissive | tizmd/lean-finitary | 5feb94a2474b55c0f23e4b61b9ac42403bf222f7 | 8958fdb3fa3d9fcc304e116fd339448875025e95 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,397,193,043 | 1,497,517,825,000 | 1,497,517,825,000 | 93,048,842 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,041 | lean | universes u v
open function
class bijection {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (f : α → β) :=
(inv : β → α)
(left_inverse_of_inv : left_inverse inv f)
(right_inverse_of_inv : right_inverse inv f)
namespace bijection
variables {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {f : α → β}
instance of_id : bijection (@id α) :=
⟨ id, take a, rfl, take a, rfl⟩
instance inverse (iso_f : bijection f) : bijection (inv f) :=
⟨f, right_inverse_of_inv f, left_inverse_of_inv f⟩
def injective_of_bijection (iso_f : bijection f) : injective f :=
injective_of_left_inverse (left_inverse_of_inv f)
lemma eq_of_inv_of_bijection (iso₁ iso₂: bijection f) : iso₁.inv = iso₂.inv :=
begin
apply funext,
intro,
apply injective_of_bijection,
assumption,
rw iso₁.right_inverse_of_inv,
rw iso₂.right_inverse_of_inv
end
lemma bijection_of_iff {a b : Prop} (h : a ↔ b) : bijection (h.mp) :=
{
inv := h.mpr,
left_inverse_of_inv := take p, proof_irrel _ _,
right_inverse_of_inv := take p, proof_irrel _ _
}
private def has_right_inverse_of_bijection (iso_f : bijection f) : has_right_inverse f := ⟨ inv f , right_inverse_of_inv f⟩
def surjective_of_bijection (iso_f : bijection f) : surjective f :=
surjective_of_has_right_inverse (has_right_inverse_of_bijection iso_f)
def bijective_of_bijection (iso_f : bijection f) : bijective f := ⟨ injective_of_bijection iso_f , surjective_of_bijection iso_f⟩
universe w
variables {γ : Sort w} {g : β → γ}
instance comp (iso_f : bijection f) (iso_g : bijection g) : bijection (g ∘ f) :=
⟨ inv f ∘ inv g,
begin
intro a,
simp [comp],
repeat {rw [left_inverse_of_inv]}
end,
begin
intro c,
simp [comp],
rw [right_inverse_of_inv f, right_inverse_of_inv g]
end⟩
end bijection
def has_bijection {α : Sort u}{β : Sort v} (f : α → β) := ∃ g : β → α, left_inverse g f ∧ right_inverse g f
namespace has_bijection
variables {α : Sort u}{β : Sort v} {f : α → β}
def injective_of_has_bijection : has_bijection f → injective f :=
λ ex, exists.elim ex (λ g h, injective_of_left_inverse (and.left h))
def surjective_of_has_bijection : has_bijection f → surjective f :=
λ ex, exists.elim ex (λ g h, surjective_of_has_right_inverse (exists.intro g (and.right h)))
def bijective_of_has_bijection : has_bijection f → bijective f := λ h, and.intro (injective_of_has_bijection h) (surjective_of_has_bijection h)
def of_bijection [ins : bijection f] : has_bijection f := exists.intro ins.inv (and.intro ins.left_inverse_of_inv ins.right_inverse_of_inv)
universe w
variables {γ : Sort w} {g : β → γ}
def trans : has_bijection f → has_bijection g → has_bijection (g ∘ f) :=
begin
intros fH gH,
cases fH with f_inv f_inv_h,
cases gH with g_inv g_inv_h,
apply (exists.intro (f_inv ∘ g_inv)),
apply and.intro,
{
intro x,
simp [comp],
rw [g_inv_h.left, f_inv_h.left]
},
{
intro x,
simp [comp],
rw [f_inv_h.right, g_inv_h.right]
}
end
end has_bijection
|
06974f587ea92c6943904f8d4641e7074a4d232b | ce89339993655da64b6ccb555c837ce6c10f9ef4 | /zeptometer/topprover/37.lean | d23f2574dbe7deab8aa0207e4d3c1492cf043d1f | [] | no_license | zeptometer/LearnLean | ef32dc36a22119f18d843f548d0bb42f907bff5d | bb84d5dbe521127ba134d4dbf9559b294a80b9f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,710,824,322 | 1,601,382,570,000 | 1,601,382,570,000 | 195,228,870 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 359 | lean | inductive iszero : ℕ → Prop
| iszero_0 : iszero 0
| iszero_S : ∀ n, iszero (nat.succ n) → iszero n
example (n) : iszero n ↔ n = 0 := begin
constructor,
intro n_is_zero,
induction n_is_zero, {
refl
}, {
cases n_is_zero_ih,
}, {
intro n_is_zero,
rw n_is_zero,
apply iszero.iszero_0
}
end |
174911c6f27eab83b43cb7c01a67da9ba2e49b48 | fc086f79b20cf002d6f34b023749998408e94fbf | /test/timing.lean | 91526a6c80e30949a0070880e0759b4dd659b40e | [] | no_license | semorrison/lean-tidy | f039460136b898fb282f75efedd92f2d5c5d90f8 | 6c1d46de6cff05e1c2c4c9692af812bca3e13b6c | refs/heads/master | 1,624,461,332,392 | 1,559,655,744,000 | 1,559,655,744,000 | 96,569,994 | 9 | 4 | null | 1,538,287,895,000 | 1,499,455,306,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 271 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Scott Morrison
import tidy.timing
open tactic
private lemma f : 1 = 1 :=
begin
(time_tactic skip) >>= trace,
simp
end
|
03008a1a7980ffe07c82e4dcd0969884bd9b87da | 6e8de6b43162bef473b4a0bd93b71db886df98ce | /src/pregeom/geometrize.lean | f3b9864557cdea78f3b7d0d9a86dcc37d510cd5e | [
"Unlicense"
] | permissive | adamtopaz/comb_geom | 38ec6fde8d2543f56227ec50cdfb86cac6ac33c1 | e16b629d6de3fbdea54a528755e7305dfb51e902 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,613,552,530 | 1,593,199,940,000 | 1,593,199,940,000 | 269,824,442 | 6 | 0 | Unlicense | 1,593,119,545,000 | 1,591,404,975,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,055 | lean | import .basic
import .pullback
import .pushforward
import data.finset
/-!
# Geometrization of a pregeometry
In this file we construct a geometry from a pregeometry in the "standard way".
We do this in four steps, as follows.
Given a pregeometry `T`, we define:
1. The subtype of "regular elements" of `T`, denoted `reg T`.
A "regular" element is an element which is not contained in the closure of `∅`.
2. We construct a pregeometry instance on `reg T`.
3. We construct the quotient of `reg T` by the equivalence relation `rel` defined as
`rel x y ↔ cls x = cls y`.
This quotient type is denoted `geom T`.
4. We construct a geometry structure on `geom T`.
-/
set_option default_priority 100
open_locale classical
namespace pregeom
open has_cl
variables (T : Type*)
/-- The set of "regular elements" (see above). -/
def reg_set [has_cl T] := { t | t ∉ cl (∅ : set T) }
/-- The subtype of regular elements (see above). -/
def reg [has_cl T] := subtype (reg_set T)
namespace reg
/-- A typeclass for regular elements of T. Mainly used to inhabited instance. -/
-- This is only here so that the linted is happy. Is this actually necessary?
class has_reg_element extends has_cl T :=
(elem : T)
(is_regular : elem ∉ cl (∅ : set T))
open has_reg_element
instance [has_reg_element T] : inhabited (reg T) := ⟨⟨elem,is_regular⟩⟩
local notation `ι` := subtype.val
instance has_cl_instance [has_cl T] : has_cl (reg T) := pregeom.pullback.has_cl_instance subtype.val
/-- The relation used to define a geometry from a pregeomery. -/
protected def rel [has_cl T] : reg T → reg T → Prop :=
λ s t, cls s = cls t
variable {T}
protected theorem is_equiv [has_cl T] : equivalence (reg.rel T) :=
begin
refine ⟨_,_,_⟩,
{ unfold reflexive reg.rel,
intro x,
refl, },
{ unfold symmetric reg.rel,
rintros x y hx,
rwa hx, },
{ unfold transitive reg.rel,
intros x y z h1 h2,
rwa [h1, h2], }
end
@[simp]
lemma cl_reg_set_inter [pregeom T] {S : set T} : cl (reg_set T ∩ S) = cl S :=
begin
ext,
split,
{ intro h,
have : reg_set T ∩ S ≤ S, by {intros x hx, cases hx, assumption},
exact monotone this h, },
{ intro h,
have : S ≤ cl (∅ : set T) ∪ (reg_set T ∩ S),
{ intros s hs,
by_cases s ∈ cl (∅ : set T),
{ left, assumption },
{ right,
exact ⟨h,hs⟩, } },
replace h := monotone this h,
rw cl_union_cl_empty at h,
exact h,
}
end
private lemma reg_lift_finset [has_cl T] {W : finset T} : ↑W ⊆ reg_set T → ∃ V : finset (reg T), finset.image ι V = W :=
begin
refine finset.induction_on W _ _; intros,
{ use ∅,
trivial, },
{ have : ↑s ⊆ reg_set T,
{ intros x hx,
apply a_3,
simp [hx], },
rcases a_2 this with ⟨V,rfl⟩,
have : a ∈ reg_set T,
{ apply a_3,
simp, },
use insert ⟨a,this⟩ V,
rwa finset.image_insert, }
end
instance pregeom_instance [pregeom T] : pregeom (reg T) := pregeom.pullback.pregeom_instance subtype.val
@[simp]
theorem regularity [has_cl T] : cl (∅ : set (reg T)) = ∅ :=
begin
change subtype.val ⁻¹' _ = _,
rw set.image_empty,
ext, split; intro hx,
{ change x.val ∈ _ at hx,
have := x.2,
contradiction, },
{ finish, }
end
end reg
/-- The setoid used to construct `geom T` from `reg T`. -/
protected def setoid [has_cl T] : setoid (reg T) := ⟨reg.rel T, reg.is_equiv⟩
/-- The geometry associated to `T`. See above. -/
def geom [has_cl T] := quotient (pregeom.setoid T)
namespace geom
variable {T}
/-- The canonical projection from `reg T` to `geom T`. -/
def to_geom [has_cl T] : reg T → geom T := quotient.mk'
local notation `π` := to_geom
instance [has_cl T] [inhabited (reg T)] : inhabited (geom T) := ⟨ π (default (reg T)) ⟩
/-- A variant of `to_geom`, but which takes a term of type `T` and a proof of "regularity" as inputs. -/
def to_geom_of_reg [has_cl T] {t : T} (h : t ∈ reg_set T) : geom T := π ⟨t,h⟩
theorem eq_iff [has_cl T] {u v : reg T} : π u = π v ↔ cls u = cls v := by simpa [to_geom]
theorem eq_iff' [pregeom T] {u v : reg T} : π u = π v ↔ u ∈ cls v :=
begin
rw eq_iff,
split,
{ intro h, rw ←h, exact mem_cls, },
{ intro h1, ext, split,
{ intro h2,
unfold cls at h1,
rw ←cls_le_iff_mem_cl at h1,
exact h1 h2, },
{ intro h2,
replace h1 := exchange_cls h1 _,
{ unfold cls at h1,
rw ←cls_le_iff_mem_cl at h1,
exact h1 h2, },
{ rw reg.regularity,
tauto, } } }
end
theorem cls_le_pullback_of_mem [pregeom T] {t : reg T} {S : set (geom T) }: π t ∈ S ↔ cls t ≤ π ⁻¹' S :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ intros u hu,
change _ ∈ cls _ at hu,
rw ←eq_iff' at hu,
rwa ←hu at h, },
{ suffices : t ∈ π ⁻¹' S, by exact this,
apply h,
exact mem_cls, }
end
lemma mem_cl_of_mem_mk_eq_mk [pregeom T] {x y : reg T} {S : set (reg T)} : x ∈ cl S → π x = π y → y ∈ cl S :=
begin
intros hx h,
suffices : cls y ≤ cl S, by exact this mem_cls,
rw eq_iff at h,
rw ←h,
change _ ⊆ _,
rw cls_le_iff_mem_cl,
assumption,
end
lemma mem_cl_of_mk_eq_mk [pregeom T] {a b : reg T} {S : set (reg T)} : a ∈ S → π b = π a → b ∈ cl S :=
begin
intros ha h,
rw eq_iff' at h,
replace ha : ({a} : set (reg T)) ≤ S,
{ rintros b ⟨rfl⟩,
assumption, },
apply monotone ha,
assumption,
end
instance has_cl_instance [has_cl T] : has_cl (geom T) :=
⟨ λ S, π '' (cl (π ⁻¹' S)) ⟩
variable [pregeom T]
@[simp]
lemma pullback_insert {t : reg T} {S : set (geom T)} : π ⁻¹' insert (π t) S = cls t ∪ π ⁻¹' S :=
begin
ext, split; intro hx,
{ change π x ∈ _ at hx,
cases hx,
{ left, rwa eq_iff' at hx, },
{ right, exact hx, } },
{ change π x ∈ _,
cases hx,
{ left, rwa eq_iff', },
{ right, exact hx, } }
end
instance pregeom_instance : pregeom (geom T) :=
begin
refine @pregeom.pushforward.pregeom_instance _ _ π _ _ (quot.exists_rep),
intros s t ht,
change π t ∈ _ at ht,
rcases ht with ⟨z,⟨rfl⟩,h2⟩,
change quotient.mk' _ = quotient.mk' _ at h2,
rw quotient.eq' at h2,
change cls s = cls t at h2,
rw h2,
exact mem_cls
end
lemma mem_cls_geom {x y : geom T} : x ∈ cls y → x = y :=
begin
intro hx,
rcases hx with ⟨z,hz,rfl⟩,
rcases quot.exists_rep y with ⟨w,hw,rfl⟩,
rw set.singleton_def at hz,
change _ ∈ cl ( π ⁻¹' (insert (π w) _) ) at hz,
rw pullback_insert at hz,
change π z = π _,
unfold cls at hz,
rw pregeom.cl_cl_union_eq_cl_union at hz,
simp only [insert_emptyc_eq, set.singleton_union, set.preimage_empty] at hz,
rwa eq_iff',
end
instance geom_instance : geometry (geom T) :=
begin
split,
{ intro x,
ext y, split; intro hy,
{ apply mem_cls_geom, assumption, },
{ change y = x at hy,
rw hy,
exact mem_cls, } },
{ change π '' cl (∅ : set (reg T)) = _,
rw reg.regularity,
finish, }
end
end geom
end pregeom |
26cb4c21cc32f747acb8d02ee7024ddb95512856 | 957a80ea22c5abb4f4670b250d55534d9db99108 | /library/init/data/char/classes.lean | 7b29351e7ba7b2f462de63c0c9f53998553e48c4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean | aa1e64d604051e602fcf4610061314b9a37ab8cd | f1ec117a24459b59c6ff9e56a1d09d9e9e60a6c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,202,909,807 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 75,319,626 | 2 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,539,290,164,000 | 1,480,616,104,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,618 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Gabriel Ebner
-/
prelude
import .basic .lemmas init.meta init.data.int
namespace char
def is_whitespace (c : char) : Prop :=
c ∈ [' ', '\t', '\n']
def is_upper (c : char) : Prop :=
c.val ≥ 65 ∧ c.val ≤ 90
def is_lower (c : char) : Prop :=
c.val ≥ 97 ∧ c.val ≤ 122
def is_alpha (c : char) : Prop :=
c.is_upper ∨ c.is_lower
def is_digit (c : char) : Prop :=
c.val ≥ 48 ∧ c.val ≤ 57
def is_alphanum (c : char) : Prop :=
c.is_alpha ∨ c.is_digit
def is_punctuation (c : char) : Prop :=
c ∈ [' ', ',', '.', '?', '!', ';', '-', '\'']
def to_lower (c : char) : char :=
let n := to_nat c in
if n >= 65 ∧ n <= 90 then of_nat (n + 32) else c
instance decidable_is_whitespace : decidable_pred is_whitespace :=
begin intro c, delta is_whitespace, apply_instance end
instance decidable_is_upper : decidable_pred is_upper :=
begin intro c, delta is_upper, apply_instance end
instance decidable_is_lower : decidable_pred is_lower :=
begin intro c, delta is_lower, apply_instance end
instance decidable_is_alpha : decidable_pred is_alpha :=
begin intro c, delta is_alpha, apply_instance end
instance decidable_is_digit : decidable_pred is_digit :=
begin intro c, delta is_digit, apply_instance end
instance decidable_is_alphanum : decidable_pred is_alphanum :=
begin intro c, delta is_alphanum, apply_instance end
instance decidable_is_punctuation : decidable_pred is_punctuation :=
begin intro c, delta is_punctuation, apply_instance end
end char
|
66f767f1ada328c66909c4a18c51ce149bb77f04 | a7eef317ddec01b9fc6cfbb876fe7ac00f205ac7 | /src/algebra/category/Group/images.lean | 25c2fdcdc2bd5cc18b4cabde1ba89a31b4834034 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kmill/mathlib | ea5a007b67ae4e9e18dd50d31d8aa60f650425ee | 1a419a9fea7b959317eddd556e1bb9639f4dcc05 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,578,197,719 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 276,482,939 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,593,637,960,000 | 1,593,637,959,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,782 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebra.category.Group
/-!
# The category of commutative additive groups has images.
-/
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
universe u
namespace AddCommGroup
-- Note that because `injective_of_mono` is currently only proved in `Type 0`,
-- we restrict to the lowest universe here for now.
variables {G H : AddCommGroup.{0}} (f : G ⟶ H)
local attribute [ext] subtype.ext_val
section -- implementation details of `has_image` for AddCommGroup; use the API, not these
/-- the image of a morphism in AddCommGroup is just the bundling of `set.range f` -/
def image : AddCommGroup := AddCommGroup.of (set.range f)
/-- the inclusion of `image f` into the target -/
def image.ι : image f ⟶ H := f.range_subtype_val
instance : mono (image.ι f) := concrete_category.mono_of_injective (image.ι f) subtype.val_injective
/-- the corestriction map to the image -/
def factor_thru_image : G ⟶ image f := add_monoid_hom.range_factorization f
lemma image.fac : factor_thru_image f ≫ image.ι f = f :=
by { ext, refl, }
local attribute [simp] image.fac
variables {f}
/-- the universal property for the image factorisation -/
noncomputable def image.lift (F' : mono_factorisation f) : image f ⟶ F'.I :=
{ to_fun :=
(λ x, F'.e (classical.indefinite_description _ x.2).1 : image f → F'.I),
map_zero' :=
begin
haveI := F'.m_mono,
apply injective_of_mono F'.m,
change (F'.e ≫ F'.m) _ = _,
rw [F'.fac, add_monoid_hom.map_zero],
convert (classical.indefinite_description (λ y, f y = 0) _).2,
end,
map_add' :=
begin
intros x y,
haveI := F'.m_mono,
apply injective_of_mono F'.m,
rw [add_monoid_hom.map_add],
change (F'.e ≫ F'.m) _ = (F'.e ≫ F'.m) _ + (F'.e ≫ F'.m) _,
rw [F'.fac],
rw (classical.indefinite_description (λ z, f z = _) _).2,
rw (classical.indefinite_description (λ z, f z = _) _).2,
rw (classical.indefinite_description (λ z, f z = _) _).2,
refl,
end,
}
lemma image.lift_fac (F' : mono_factorisation f) : image.lift F' ≫ F'.m = image.ι f :=
begin
ext x,
change (F'.e ≫ F'.m) _ = _,
rw [F'.fac, (classical.indefinite_description _ x.2).2],
refl,
end
end
/-- the factorisation of any morphism in AddCommGroup through a mono. -/
def mono_factorisation : mono_factorisation f :=
{ I := image f,
m := image.ι f,
e := factor_thru_image f }
noncomputable instance : has_image f :=
{ F := mono_factorisation f,
is_image :=
{ lift := image.lift,
lift_fac' := image.lift_fac } }
noncomputable instance : has_images.{0} AddCommGroup.{0} :=
{ has_image := infer_instance }
end AddCommGroup
|
7db3fa5978db6515ebcc4fbf2f4a61c141fce365 | efa51dd2edbbbbd6c34bd0ce436415eb405832e7 | /20170116_POPL/super/listex.lean | 0b289b65e2e81eef0620d27dcf2efaf9e4d9be93 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover/presentations | dd031a05bcb12c8855676c77e52ed84246bd889a | 3ce2d132d299409f1de269fa8e95afa1333d644e | refs/heads/master | 1,688,703,388,796 | 1,686,838,383,000 | 1,687,465,742,000 | 29,750,158 | 12 | 9 | Apache-2.0 | 1,540,211,670,000 | 1,422,042,683,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,629 | lean | import tools.super
open list
-- These are the same examples we used to show backchaining. (see backchaining directory)
-- Backchaining is a special case of resolution, so we can solve them using
-- super as well.
set_option trace.super true
-- The first few cases can be handled by super's built-in support for data types
-- and definition unfolding:
-- when super sees a clause [a ∉ b :: bs], it will derive [a ≠ b] and [a ∉ bs].
example (a b c : nat) : a ∈ [b, c] ++ [b, a, b] :=
by super
example (a b c : nat) : a ∈ [b, c] ++ [b, c, c] ++ [b, a, b] :=
by super
example (a b c : nat) (l : list nat) : a ∈ l → a ∈ [b, c] ++ b::l :=
by super
-- However super doesn't know anything about append, so it cannot figure out
-- that append preserves membership:
example (x : nat) (xs ys : list nat) : x ∈ xs → x ∈ xs ++ ys :=
by super
-- So we need to tell super about append. (We also need to give it a few lemmas
-- about membership and cons, otherwise it gets lost.)
universe variable u
lemma in_tail {α : Type u} {a : α} (b : α) {l : list α} : a ∈ l → a ∈ b::l := mem_cons_of_mem _
lemma in_head {α : Type u} (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ a::l := mem_cons_self _ _
lemma in_left {α : Type u} {a : α} {l : list α} (r : list α) : a ∈ l → a ∈ l ++ r := mem_append_left _
lemma in_right {α : Type u} {a : α} (l : list α) {r : list α} : a ∈ r → a ∈ l ++ r := mem_append_right _
example (a b c : nat) (l₁ l₂ : list nat) : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ b::b::c::l₂ ++ b::c::l₁ ++ [c, c, b] :=
by super with in_left in_right in_head in_tail
|
2fb675861829d5a9ddffcc82d805b539a52b5025 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/pkg/prv/Prv.lean | 7d4ffe350960870ada3da02ec5aa8e875409797a | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 160 | lean | import Prv.Foo
#check { name := "leo", val := 15 : Foo }
#check { name := "leo", val := 15 : Foo }.name
#check { name := "leo", val := 15 : Foo }.val -- Error
|
dedf855970e48a6a7ec66ea1adabbdeec0dd1b62 | 1abd1ed12aa68b375cdef28959f39531c6e95b84 | /src/data/equiv/list.lean | a78557c219daa0fa98a086d1af53b00f7466f48f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jumpy4/mathlib | d3829e75173012833e9f15ac16e481e17596de0f | af36f1a35f279f0e5b3c2a77647c6bf2cfd51a13 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,508,842,818 | 1,636,203,271,000 | 1,636,203,271,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,912 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.equiv.denumerable
import data.finset.sort
/-!
# Equivalences involving `list`-like types
This file defines some additional constructive equivalences using `encodable` and the pairing
function on `ℕ`.
-/
open nat list
namespace encodable
variables {α : Type*}
section list
variable [encodable α]
/-- Explicit encoding function for `list α` -/
def encode_list : list α → ℕ
| [] := 0
| (a::l) := succ (mkpair (encode a) (encode_list l))
/-- Explicit decoding function for `list α` -/
def decode_list : ℕ → option (list α)
| 0 := some []
| (succ v) := match unpair v, unpair_right_le v with
| (v₁, v₂), h :=
have v₂ < succ v, from lt_succ_of_le h,
(::) <$> decode α v₁ <*> decode_list v₂
end
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `list α`. This uses the `mkpair` and `unpair` functions from
`data.nat.pairing`. -/
instance list : encodable (list α) :=
⟨encode_list, decode_list, λ l,
by induction l with a l IH; simp [encode_list, decode_list, unpair_mkpair, encodek, *]⟩
@[simp] theorem encode_list_nil : encode (@nil α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem encode_list_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
encode (a :: l) = succ (mkpair (encode a) (encode l)) := rfl
@[simp] theorem decode_list_zero : decode (list α) 0 = some [] :=
show decode_list 0 = some [], by rw decode_list
@[simp] theorem decode_list_succ (v : ℕ) :
decode (list α) (succ v) =
(::) <$> decode α v.unpair.1 <*> decode (list α) v.unpair.2 :=
show decode_list (succ v) = _, begin
cases e : unpair v with v₁ v₂,
simp [decode_list, e], refl
end
theorem length_le_encode : ∀ (l : list α), length l ≤ encode l
| [] := _root_.zero_le _
| (a :: l) := succ_le_succ $ (length_le_encode l).trans (right_le_mkpair _ _)
end list
section finset
variables [encodable α]
private def enle : α → α → Prop := encode ⁻¹'o (≤)
private lemma enle.is_linear_order : is_linear_order α enle :=
(rel_embedding.preimage ⟨encode, encode_injective⟩ (≤)).is_linear_order
private def decidable_enle (a b : α) : decidable (enle a b) :=
by unfold enle order.preimage; apply_instance
local attribute [instance] enle.is_linear_order decidable_enle
/-- Explicit encoding function for `multiset α` -/
def encode_multiset (s : multiset α) : ℕ :=
encode (s.sort enle)
/-- Explicit decoding function for `multiset α` -/
def decode_multiset (n : ℕ) : option (multiset α) :=
coe <$> decode (list α) n
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `multiset α`. -/
instance multiset : encodable (multiset α) :=
⟨encode_multiset, decode_multiset,
λ s, by simp [encode_multiset, decode_multiset, encodek]⟩
end finset
/-- A listable type with decidable equality is encodable. -/
def encodable_of_list [decidable_eq α] (l : list α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ l) : encodable α :=
⟨λ a, index_of a l, l.nth, λ a, index_of_nth (H _)⟩
def trunc_encodable_of_fintype (α : Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] : trunc (encodable α) :=
@@quot.rec_on_subsingleton _
(λ s : multiset α, (∀ x:α, x ∈ s) → trunc (encodable α)) _
finset.univ.1
(λ l H, trunc.mk $ encodable_of_list l H)
finset.mem_univ
/-- A noncomputable way to arbitrarily choose an ordering on a finite type.
It is not made into a global instance, since it involves an arbitrary choice.
This can be locally made into an instance with `local attribute [instance] fintype.encodable`. -/
noncomputable def _root_.fintype.encodable (α : Type*) [fintype α] : encodable α :=
by { classical, exact (encodable.trunc_encodable_of_fintype α).out }
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `vector α n`. -/
instance vector [encodable α] {n} : encodable (vector α n) :=
encodable.subtype
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `fin n → α`. -/
instance fin_arrow [encodable α] {n} : encodable (fin n → α) :=
of_equiv _ (equiv.vector_equiv_fin _ _).symm
instance fin_pi (n) (π : fin n → Type*) [∀ i, encodable (π i)] : encodable (Π i, π i) :=
of_equiv _ (equiv.pi_equiv_subtype_sigma (fin n) π)
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `array n α`. -/
instance array [encodable α] {n} : encodable (array n α) :=
of_equiv _ (equiv.array_equiv_fin _ _)
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `finset α`. -/
instance finset [encodable α] : encodable (finset α) :=
by haveI := decidable_eq_of_encodable α; exact
of_equiv {s : multiset α // s.nodup}
⟨λ ⟨a, b⟩, ⟨a, b⟩, λ ⟨a, b⟩, ⟨a, b⟩, λ ⟨a, b⟩, rfl, λ ⟨a, b⟩, rfl⟩
def fintype_arrow (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] [encodable β] :
trunc (encodable (α → β)) :=
(fintype.trunc_equiv_fin α).map $
λ f, encodable.of_equiv (fin (fintype.card α) → β) $
equiv.arrow_congr f (equiv.refl _)
def fintype_pi (α : Type*) (π : α → Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] [∀ a, encodable (π a)] :
trunc (encodable (Π a, π a)) :=
(encodable.trunc_encodable_of_fintype α).bind $ λ a,
(@fintype_arrow α (Σa, π a) _ _ (@encodable.sigma _ _ a _)).bind $ λ f,
trunc.mk $ @encodable.of_equiv _ _ (@encodable.subtype _ _ f _) (equiv.pi_equiv_subtype_sigma α π)
/-- The elements of a `fintype` as a sorted list. -/
def sorted_univ (α) [fintype α] [encodable α] : list α :=
finset.univ.sort (encodable.encode' α ⁻¹'o (≤))
theorem mem_sorted_univ {α} [fintype α] [encodable α] (x : α) : x ∈ sorted_univ α :=
(finset.mem_sort _).2 (finset.mem_univ _)
theorem length_sorted_univ {α} [fintype α] [encodable α] :
(sorted_univ α).length = fintype.card α :=
finset.length_sort _
theorem sorted_univ_nodup {α} [fintype α] [encodable α] : (sorted_univ α).nodup :=
finset.sort_nodup _ _
/-- An encodable `fintype` is equivalent to the same size `fin`. -/
def fintype_equiv_fin {α} [fintype α] [encodable α] :
α ≃ fin (fintype.card α) :=
begin
haveI : decidable_eq α := encodable.decidable_eq_of_encodable _,
transitivity,
{ exact fintype.equiv_fin_of_forall_mem_list mem_sorted_univ (@sorted_univ_nodup α _ _) },
exact equiv.cast (congr_arg _ (@length_sorted_univ α _ _))
end
/-- If `α` and `β` are encodable and `α` is a fintype, then `α → β` is encodable as well. -/
instance fintype_arrow_of_encodable {α β : Type*} [encodable α] [fintype α] [encodable β] :
encodable (α → β) :=
of_equiv (fin (fintype.card α) → β) $ equiv.arrow_congr fintype_equiv_fin (equiv.refl _)
end encodable
namespace denumerable
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [denumerable α] [denumerable β]
open encodable
section list
theorem denumerable_list_aux : ∀ n : ℕ,
∃ a ∈ @decode_list α _ n, encode_list a = n
| 0 := by rw decode_list; exact ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
| (succ v) := begin
cases e : unpair v with v₁ v₂,
have h := unpair_right_le v,
rw e at h,
rcases have v₂ < succ v, from lt_succ_of_le h,
denumerable_list_aux v₂ with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩,
rw option.mem_def at h₁,
use of_nat α v₁ :: a,
simp [decode_list, e, h₂, h₁, encode_list, mkpair_unpair' e],
end
/-- If `α` is denumerable, then so is `list α`. -/
instance denumerable_list : denumerable (list α) := ⟨denumerable_list_aux⟩
@[simp] theorem list_of_nat_zero : of_nat (list α) 0 = [] :=
by rw [← @encode_list_nil α, of_nat_encode]
@[simp] theorem list_of_nat_succ (v : ℕ) :
of_nat (list α) (succ v) =
of_nat α v.unpair.1 :: of_nat (list α) v.unpair.2 :=
of_nat_of_decode $ show decode_list (succ v) = _,
begin
cases e : unpair v with v₁ v₂,
simp [decode_list, e],
rw [show decode_list v₂ = decode (list α) v₂,
from rfl, decode_eq_of_nat]; refl
end
end list
section multiset
/-- Outputs the list of differences of the input list, that is
`lower [a₁, a₂, ...] n = [a₁ - n, a₂ - a₁, ...]` -/
def lower : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m - n) :: lower l m
/-- Outputs the list of partial sums of the input list, that is
`raise [a₁, a₂, ...] n = [n + a₁, n + a₁ + a₂, ...]` -/
def raise : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m + n) :: raise l (m + n)
lemma lower_raise : ∀ l n, lower (raise l n) n = l
| [] n := rfl
| (m :: l) n := by rw [raise, lower, add_tsub_cancel_right, lower_raise]
lemma raise_lower : ∀ {l n}, list.sorted (≤) (n :: l) → raise (lower l n) n = l
| [] n h := rfl
| (m :: l) n h :=
have n ≤ m, from list.rel_of_sorted_cons h _ (l.mem_cons_self _),
by simp [raise, lower, tsub_add_cancel_of_le this,
raise_lower (list.sorted_of_sorted_cons h)]
lemma raise_chain : ∀ l n, list.chain (≤) n (raise l n)
| [] n := list.chain.nil
| (m :: l) n := list.chain.cons (nat.le_add_left _ _) (raise_chain _ _)
/-- `raise l n` is an non-decreasing sequence. -/
lemma raise_sorted : ∀ l n, list.sorted (≤) (raise l n)
| [] n := list.sorted_nil
| (m :: l) n := (list.chain_iff_pairwise (@le_trans _ _)).1 (raise_chain _ _)
/-- If `α` is denumerable, then so is `multiset α`. Warning: this is *not* the same encoding as used
in `encodable.multiset`. -/
instance multiset : denumerable (multiset α) := mk' ⟨
λ s : multiset α, encode $ lower ((s.map encode).sort (≤)) 0,
λ n, multiset.map (of_nat α) (raise (of_nat (list ℕ) n) 0),
λ s, by have := raise_lower
(list.sorted_cons.2 ⟨λ n _, zero_le n, (s.map encode).sort_sorted _⟩);
simp [-multiset.coe_map, this],
λ n, by simp [-multiset.coe_map, list.merge_sort_eq_self _ (raise_sorted _ _), lower_raise]⟩
end multiset
section finset
/-- Outputs the list of differences minus one of the input list, that is
`lower' [a₁, a₂, a₃, ...] n = [a₁ - n, a₂ - a₁ - 1, a₃ - a₂ - 1, ...]`. -/
def lower' : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m - n) :: lower' l (m + 1)
/-- Outputs the list of partial sums plus one of the input list, that is
`raise [a₁, a₂, a₃, ...] n = [n + a₁, n + a₁ + a₂ + 1, n + a₁ + a₂ + a₃ + 2, ...]`. Adding one each
time ensures the elements are distinct. -/
def raise' : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m + n) :: raise' l (m + n + 1)
lemma lower_raise' : ∀ l n, lower' (raise' l n) n = l
| [] n := rfl
| (m :: l) n := by simp [raise', lower', add_tsub_cancel_right, lower_raise']
lemma raise_lower' : ∀ {l n}, (∀ m ∈ l, n ≤ m) → list.sorted (<) l → raise' (lower' l n) n = l
| [] n h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (m :: l) n h₁ h₂ :=
have n ≤ m, from h₁ _ (l.mem_cons_self _),
by simp [raise', lower', tsub_add_cancel_of_le this, raise_lower'
(list.rel_of_sorted_cons h₂ : ∀ a ∈ l, m < a) (list.sorted_of_sorted_cons h₂)]
lemma raise'_chain : ∀ l {m n}, m < n → list.chain (<) m (raise' l n)
| [] m n h := list.chain.nil
| (a :: l) m n h := list.chain.cons
(lt_of_lt_of_le h (nat.le_add_left _ _)) (raise'_chain _ (lt_succ_self _))
/-- `raise' l n` is a strictly increasing sequence. -/
lemma raise'_sorted : ∀ l n, list.sorted (<) (raise' l n)
| [] n := list.sorted_nil
| (m :: l) n := (list.chain_iff_pairwise (@lt_trans _ _)).1
(raise'_chain _ (lt_succ_self _))
/-- Makes `raise' l n` into a finset. Elements are distinct thanks to `raise'_sorted`. -/
def raise'_finset (l : list ℕ) (n : ℕ) : finset ℕ :=
⟨raise' l n, (raise'_sorted _ _).imp (@ne_of_lt _ _)⟩
/-- If `α` is denumerable, then so is `finset α`. Warning: this is *not* the same encoding as used
in `encodable.finset`. -/
instance finset : denumerable (finset α) := mk' ⟨
λ s : finset α, encode $ lower' ((s.map (eqv α).to_embedding).sort (≤)) 0,
λ n, finset.map (eqv α).symm.to_embedding (raise'_finset (of_nat (list ℕ) n) 0),
λ s, finset.eq_of_veq $ by simp [-multiset.coe_map, raise'_finset,
raise_lower' (λ n _, zero_le n) (finset.sort_sorted_lt _)],
λ n, by simp [-multiset.coe_map, finset.map, raise'_finset, finset.sort,
list.merge_sort_eq_self (≤) ((raise'_sorted _ _).imp (@le_of_lt _ _)),
lower_raise']⟩
end finset
end denumerable
namespace equiv
/-- The type lists on unit is canonically equivalent to the natural numbers. -/
def list_unit_equiv : list unit ≃ ℕ :=
{ to_fun := list.length,
inv_fun := list.repeat (),
left_inv := λ u, list.length_injective (by simp),
right_inv := λ n, list.length_repeat () n }
/-- `list ℕ` is equivalent to `ℕ`. -/
def list_nat_equiv_nat : list ℕ ≃ ℕ := denumerable.eqv _
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `ℕ`, then `list α` is equivalent to `α`. -/
def list_equiv_self_of_equiv_nat {α : Type} (e : α ≃ ℕ) : list α ≃ α :=
calc list α ≃ list ℕ : list_equiv_of_equiv e
... ≃ ℕ : list_nat_equiv_nat
... ≃ α : e.symm
end equiv
|
550341e1582df0d49a0e40d0cab952cc0468ff39 | 26ac254ecb57ffcb886ff709cf018390161a9225 | /src/geometry/manifold/real_instances.lean | e6d96c1f92fc0bd9e386498a2add3d40104a60d8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eric-wieser/mathlib | 42842584f584359bbe1fc8b88b3ff937c8acd72d | d0df6b81cd0920ad569158c06a3fd5abb9e63301 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,546,404,255 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 281,173,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,263,582,000 | 1,595,263,581,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,755 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import geometry.manifold.smooth_manifold_with_corners
import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
import analysis.normed_space.real_inner_product
/-!
# Constructing examples of manifolds over ℝ
We introduce the necessary bits to be able to define manifolds modelled over `ℝ^n`, boundaryless
or with boundary or with corners. As a concrete example, we construct explicitly the manifold with
boundary structure on the real interval `[x, y]`.
More specifically, we introduce
* `model_with_corners ℝ (euclidean_space (fin n)) (euclidean_half_space n)` for the model space used
to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with boundary
* `model_with_corners ℝ (euclidean_space (fin n)) (euclidean_quadrant n)` for the model space used
to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with corners
## Notations
In the locale `manifold`, we introduce the notations
* `𝓡 n` for the identity model with corners on `euclidean_space (fin n)`
* `𝓡∂ n` for `model_with_corners ℝ (euclidean_space (fin n)) (euclidean_half_space n)`.
For instance, if a manifold `M` is boundaryless, smooth and modelled on `euclidean_space (fin m)`,
and `N` is smooth with boundary modelled on `euclidean_half_space n`, and `f : M → N` is a smooth
map, then the derivative of `f` can be written simply as `mfderiv (𝓡 m) (𝓡∂ n) f` (as to why the
model with corners can not be implicit, see the discussion in `smooth_manifold_with_corners.lean`).
## Implementation notes
The manifold structure on the interval `[x, y] = Icc x y` requires the assumption `x < y` as a
typeclass. We provide it as `[fact (x < y)]`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open set
open_locale manifold
/--
The half-space in `ℝ^n`, used to model manifolds with boundary. We only define it when
`1 ≤ n`, as the definition only makes sense in this case.
-/
def euclidean_half_space (n : ℕ) [has_zero (fin n)] : Type :=
{x : euclidean_space (fin n) // 0 ≤ x 0}
/--
The quadrant in `ℝ^n`, used to model manifolds with corners, made of all vectors with nonnegative
coordinates.
-/
def euclidean_quadrant (n : ℕ) : Type := {x : euclidean_space (fin n) // ∀i:fin n, 0 ≤ x i}
section
/- Register class instances for euclidean half-space and quadrant, that can not be noticed
without the following reducibility attribute (which is only set in this section). -/
local attribute [reducible] euclidean_half_space euclidean_quadrant
variable {n : ℕ}
instance [has_zero (fin n)] : topological_space (euclidean_half_space n) := by apply_instance
instance : topological_space (euclidean_quadrant n) := by apply_instance
instance [has_zero (fin n)] : inhabited (euclidean_half_space n) := ⟨⟨0, le_refl _⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (euclidean_quadrant n) := ⟨⟨0, λ i, le_refl _⟩⟩
lemma range_half_space (n : ℕ) [has_zero (fin n)] :
range (λx : euclidean_half_space n, x.val) = {y | 0 ≤ y 0} :=
by simp
lemma range_quadrant (n : ℕ) :
range (λx : euclidean_quadrant n, x.val) = {y | ∀i:fin n, 0 ≤ y i} :=
by simp
end
/--
Definition of the model with corners `(euclidean_space (fin n), euclidean_half_space n)`, used as a
model for manifolds with boundary. In the locale `manifold`, use the shortcut `𝓡∂ n`.
-/
def model_with_corners_euclidean_half_space (n : ℕ) [has_zero (fin n)] :
model_with_corners ℝ (euclidean_space (fin n)) (euclidean_half_space n) :=
{ to_fun := λx, x.val,
inv_fun := λx, ⟨λi, if h : i = 0 then max (x i) 0 else x i, by simp [le_refl]⟩,
source := univ,
target := range (λx : euclidean_half_space n, x.val),
map_source' := λx hx, by simpa only [subtype.range_val] using x.property,
map_target' := λx hx, mem_univ _,
left_inv' := λ⟨xval, xprop⟩ hx, begin
rw subtype.mk_eq_mk,
ext1 i,
by_cases hi : i = 0,
{ rw hi, simp only [xprop, dif_pos, max_eq_left] },
{ simp only [hi, dif_neg, not_false_iff] }
end,
right_inv' := λx hx, begin
simp only [mem_set_of_eq, subtype.range_val_subtype] at hx,
ext1 i,
by_cases hi : i = 0,
{ rw hi, simp only [hx, dif_pos, max_eq_left] } ,
{ simp only [hi, dif_neg, not_false_iff] }
end,
source_eq := rfl,
unique_diff' := begin
/- To check that the half-space has the unique differentiability property, we use the criterion
`unique_diff_on_convex`: it suffices to check that it is convex and with nonempty interior. -/
rw range_half_space,
apply unique_diff_on_convex,
show convex {y : euclidean_space (fin n) | 0 ≤ y 0},
{ assume x y hx hy a b ha hb hab,
simpa only [add_zero] using add_le_add (mul_nonneg ha hx) (mul_nonneg hb hy) },
show (interior {y : euclidean_space (fin n) | 0 ≤ y 0}).nonempty,
{ use (λi, 1),
rw mem_interior,
refine ⟨(pi (univ : set (fin n)) (λi, (Ioi 0 : set ℝ))), _,
is_open_set_pi finite_univ (λa ha, is_open_Ioi), _⟩,
{ assume x hx,
simp only [pi, forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ, mem_Ioi] at hx,
exact le_of_lt (hx 0) },
{ simp only [pi, forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ, mem_Ioi],
assume i,
exact zero_lt_one } }
end,
continuous_to_fun := continuous_subtype_val,
continuous_inv_fun := begin
apply continuous_subtype_mk,
apply continuous_pi,
assume i,
by_cases h : i = 0,
{ rw h,
simp only [dif_pos],
have : continuous (λx:ℝ, max x 0) := continuous_id.max continuous_const,
exact this.comp (continuous_apply 0) },
{ simp only [h, dif_neg, not_false_iff],
exact continuous_apply i }
end }
/--
Definition of the model with corners `(euclidean_space (fin n), euclidean_quadrant n)`, used as a
model for manifolds with corners -/
def model_with_corners_euclidean_quadrant (n : ℕ) :
model_with_corners ℝ (euclidean_space (fin n)) (euclidean_quadrant n) :=
{ to_fun := λx, x.val,
inv_fun := λx, ⟨λi, max (x i) 0, λi, by simp only [le_refl, or_true, le_max_iff]⟩,
source := univ,
target := range (λx : euclidean_quadrant n, x.val),
map_source' := λx hx, by simpa only [subtype.range_val] using x.property,
map_target' := λx hx, mem_univ _,
left_inv' := λ⟨xval, xprop⟩ hx, begin
rw subtype.mk_eq_mk,
ext1 i,
simp only [xprop i, max_eq_left]
end,
right_inv' := λx hx, begin
rw range_quadrant at hx,
ext1 i,
simp only [hx i, max_eq_left]
end,
source_eq := rfl,
unique_diff' := begin
/- To check that the quadrant has the unique differentiability property, we use the criterion
`unique_diff_on_convex`: it suffices to check that it is convex and with nonempty interior. -/
rw range_quadrant,
apply unique_diff_on_convex,
show convex {y : euclidean_space (fin n) | ∀ (i : fin n), 0 ≤ y i},
{ assume x y hx hy a b ha hb hab i,
simpa only [add_zero] using add_le_add (mul_nonneg ha (hx i)) (mul_nonneg hb (hy i)) },
show (interior {y : euclidean_space (fin n) | ∀ (i : fin n), 0 ≤ y i}).nonempty,
{ use (λi, 1),
rw mem_interior,
refine ⟨(pi (univ : set (fin n)) (λi, (Ioi 0 : set ℝ))), _,
is_open_set_pi finite_univ (λa ha, is_open_Ioi), _⟩,
{ assume x hx i,
simp only [pi, forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ, mem_Ioi] at hx,
exact le_of_lt (hx i) },
{ simp only [pi, forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ, mem_Ioi],
assume i,
exact zero_lt_one } }
end,
continuous_to_fun := continuous_subtype_val,
continuous_inv_fun := begin
apply continuous_subtype_mk,
apply continuous_pi,
assume i,
have : continuous (λx:ℝ, max x 0) := continuous.max continuous_id continuous_const,
exact this.comp (continuous_apply i)
end }
localized "notation `𝓡 `n := model_with_corners_self ℝ (euclidean_space (fin n))" in manifold
localized "notation `𝓡∂ `n := model_with_corners_euclidean_half_space n" in manifold
/--
The left chart for the topological space `[x, y]`, defined on `[x,y)` and sending `x` to `0` in
`euclidean_half_space 1`.
-/
def Icc_left_chart (x y : ℝ) [fact (x < y)] :
local_homeomorph (Icc x y) (euclidean_half_space 1) :=
{ source := {z : Icc x y | z.val < y},
target := {z : euclidean_half_space 1 | z.val 0 < y - x},
to_fun := λ(z : Icc x y), ⟨λi, z.val - x, sub_nonneg.mpr z.property.1⟩,
inv_fun := λz, ⟨min (z.val 0 + x) y, by simp [le_refl, z.prop, le_of_lt ‹x < y›]⟩,
map_source' := by simp only [imp_self, sub_lt_sub_iff_right, mem_set_of_eq, forall_true_iff],
map_target' :=
by { simp only [min_lt_iff, mem_set_of_eq], assume z hz, left,
dsimp [-subtype.val_eq_coe] at hz, linarith },
left_inv' := begin
rintros ⟨z, hz⟩ h'z,
simp only [mem_set_of_eq, mem_Icc] at hz h'z,
simp only [hz, min_eq_left, sub_add_cancel]
end,
right_inv' := begin
rintros ⟨z, hz⟩ h'z,
rw subtype.mk_eq_mk,
funext,
dsimp at hz h'z,
have A : x + z 0 ≤ y, by linarith,
rw subsingleton.elim i 0,
simp only [A, add_comm, add_sub_cancel', min_eq_left],
end,
open_source := begin
have : is_open {z : ℝ | z < y} := is_open_Iio,
exact continuous_subtype_val _ this
end,
open_target := begin
have : is_open {z : ℝ | z < y - x} := is_open_Iio,
have : is_open {z : euclidean_space (fin 1) | z 0 < y - x} :=
@continuous_apply (fin 1) (λ _, ℝ) _ 0 _ this,
exact continuous_subtype_val _ this
end,
continuous_to_fun := begin
apply continuous.continuous_on,
apply continuous_subtype_mk,
have : continuous (λ (z : ℝ) (i : fin 1), z - x) :=
continuous.sub (continuous_pi $ λi, continuous_id) continuous_const,
exact this.comp continuous_subtype_val,
end,
continuous_inv_fun := begin
apply continuous.continuous_on,
apply continuous_subtype_mk,
have A : continuous (λ z : ℝ, min (z + x) y) :=
(continuous_id.add continuous_const).min continuous_const,
have B : continuous (λz : euclidean_space (fin 1), z 0) := continuous_apply 0,
exact (A.comp B).comp continuous_subtype_val
end }
/--
The right chart for the topological space `[x, y]`, defined on `(x,y]` and sending `y` to `0` in
`euclidean_half_space 1`.
-/
def Icc_right_chart (x y : ℝ) [fact (x < y)] :
local_homeomorph (Icc x y) (euclidean_half_space 1) :=
{ source := {z : Icc x y | x < z.val},
target := {z : euclidean_half_space 1 | z.val 0 < y - x},
to_fun := λ(z : Icc x y), ⟨λi, y - z.val, sub_nonneg.mpr z.property.2⟩,
inv_fun := λz,
⟨max (y - z.val 0) x, by simp [le_refl, z.prop, le_of_lt ‹x < y›, sub_eq_add_neg]⟩,
map_source' := by simp only [imp_self, mem_set_of_eq, sub_lt_sub_iff_left, forall_true_iff],
map_target' :=
by { simp only [lt_max_iff, mem_set_of_eq], assume z hz, left,
dsimp [-subtype.val_eq_coe] at hz, linarith },
left_inv' := begin
rintros ⟨z, hz⟩ h'z,
simp only [mem_set_of_eq, mem_Icc] at hz h'z,
simp only [hz, sub_eq_add_neg, max_eq_left, add_add_neg_cancel'_right, neg_add_rev, neg_neg]
end,
right_inv' := begin
rintros ⟨z, hz⟩ h'z,
rw subtype.mk_eq_mk,
funext,
dsimp at hz h'z,
have A : x ≤ y - z 0, by linarith,
rw subsingleton.elim i 0,
simp only [A, sub_sub_cancel, max_eq_left],
end,
open_source := begin
have : is_open {z : ℝ | x < z} := is_open_Ioi,
exact continuous_subtype_val _ this
end,
open_target := begin
have : is_open {z : ℝ | z < y - x} := is_open_Iio,
have : is_open {z : euclidean_space (fin 1) | z 0 < y - x} :=
@continuous_apply (fin 1) (λ _, ℝ) _ 0 _ this,
exact continuous_subtype_val _ this
end,
continuous_to_fun := begin
apply continuous.continuous_on,
apply continuous_subtype_mk,
have : continuous (λ (z : ℝ) (i : fin 1), y - z) :=
continuous_const.sub (continuous_pi (λi, continuous_id)),
exact this.comp continuous_subtype_val,
end,
continuous_inv_fun := begin
apply continuous.continuous_on,
apply continuous_subtype_mk,
have A : continuous (λ z : ℝ, max (y - z) x) :=
(continuous_const.sub continuous_id).max continuous_const,
have B : continuous (λz : euclidean_space (fin 1), z 0) := continuous_apply 0,
exact (A.comp B).comp continuous_subtype_val
end }
/--
Charted space structure on `[x, y]`, using only two charts taking values in `euclidean_half_space 1`.
-/
instance Icc_manifold (x y : ℝ) [fact (x < y)] : charted_space (euclidean_half_space 1) (Icc x y) :=
{ atlas := {Icc_left_chart x y, Icc_right_chart x y},
chart_at := λz, if z.val < y then Icc_left_chart x y else Icc_right_chart x y,
mem_chart_source := λz, begin
by_cases h' : z.val < y,
{ simp only [h', if_true],
exact h' },
{ simp only [h', if_false],
apply lt_of_lt_of_le ‹x < y›,
simpa only [not_lt] using h'}
end,
chart_mem_atlas := λz, by { by_cases h' : z.val < y; simp [h'] } }
/--
The manifold structure on `[x, y]` is smooth.
-/
instance Icc_smooth_manifold (x y : ℝ) [fact (x < y)] :
smooth_manifold_with_corners (𝓡∂ 1) (Icc x y) :=
begin
have M : times_cont_diff_on ℝ ∞ (λz : euclidean_space (fin 1), - z + (λi, y - x)) univ,
{ rw times_cont_diff_on_univ,
exact times_cont_diff_id.neg.add times_cont_diff_const },
haveI : has_groupoid (Icc x y) (times_cont_diff_groupoid ∞ (𝓡∂ 1)) :=
begin
apply has_groupoid_of_pregroupoid,
assume e e' he he',
simp only [atlas, mem_singleton_iff, mem_insert_iff] at he he',
/- We need to check that any composition of two charts gives a `C^∞` function. Each chart can be
either the left chart or the right chart, leaving 4 possibilities that we handle successively.
-/
rcases he with rfl | rfl; rcases he' with rfl | rfl,
{ -- `e = left chart`, `e' = left chart`
refine (mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr _).1,
exact symm_trans_mem_times_cont_diff_groupoid _ _ _ },
{ -- `e = left chart`, `e' = right chart`
apply M.congr_mono _ (subset_univ _),
assume z hz,
simp only [model_with_corners_euclidean_half_space, Icc_left_chart, Icc_right_chart, dif_pos,
lt_add_iff_pos_left, max_lt_iff, lt_min_iff, sub_pos, lt_max_iff, subtype.range_val]
with mfld_simps at hz,
have A : 0 ≤ z 0 := hz.2,
have B : z 0 + x ≤ y, by { have := hz.1.1.1, linarith },
ext i,
rw subsingleton.elim i 0,
simp only [model_with_corners_euclidean_half_space, Icc_left_chart, Icc_right_chart, A, B,
pi_Lp.add_apply, dif_pos, min_eq_left, max_eq_left, pi_Lp.neg_apply] with mfld_simps,
ring },
{ -- `e = right chart`, `e' = left chart`
apply M.congr_mono _ (subset_univ _),
assume z hz,
simp only [model_with_corners_euclidean_half_space, Icc_left_chart, Icc_right_chart, dif_pos,
max_lt_iff, sub_pos, subtype.range_val] with mfld_simps at hz,
have A : 0 ≤ z 0 := hz.2,
have B : x ≤ y - z 0, by { have := hz.1.1.1, dsimp at this, linarith },
ext i,
rw subsingleton.elim i 0,
simp only [model_with_corners_euclidean_half_space, Icc_left_chart, Icc_right_chart, A, B,
pi_Lp.add_apply, dif_pos, max_eq_left, pi_Lp.neg_apply] with mfld_simps,
ring },
{ -- `e = right chart`, `e' = right chart`
refine (mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr _).1,
exact symm_trans_mem_times_cont_diff_groupoid _ _ _ }
end,
constructor
end
/- Register an instance of `0 < 1` to be able to use freely the manifold structure on `Icc 0 1`. -/
instance : fact ((0 : ℝ) < 1) := zero_lt_one
|
a1ab2f35c690f95b5e9a92a72cff5650bbe0d0fb | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/data/nat/cast.lean | 972a4b3822453e3d2a906a09a13e1d557e87bf79 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,885 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.nat.basic
import data.nat.cast.defs
import algebra.group.pi
import tactic.pi_instances
/-!
# Cast of natural numbers (additional theorems)
This file proves additional properties about the *canonical* homomorphism from
the natural numbers into an additive monoid with a one (`nat.cast`).
## Main declarations
* `cast_add_monoid_hom`: `cast` bundled as an `add_monoid_hom`.
* `cast_ring_hom`: `cast` bundled as a `ring_hom`.
-/
namespace nat
variables {α : Type*}
/-- `coe : ℕ → α` as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
def cast_add_monoid_hom (α : Type*) [add_monoid_with_one α] : ℕ →+ α :=
{ to_fun := coe,
map_add' := cast_add,
map_zero' := cast_zero }
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_add_monoid_hom [add_monoid_with_one α] :
(cast_add_monoid_hom α : ℕ → α) = coe := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_mul [non_assoc_semiring α] (m n : ℕ) :
((m * n : ℕ) : α) = m * n :=
by induction n; simp [mul_succ, mul_add, *]
/-- `coe : ℕ → α` as a `ring_hom` -/
def cast_ring_hom (α : Type*) [non_assoc_semiring α] : ℕ →+* α :=
{ to_fun := coe,
map_one' := cast_one,
map_mul' := cast_mul,
.. cast_add_monoid_hom α }
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_ring_hom [non_assoc_semiring α] : (cast_ring_hom α : ℕ → α) = coe := rfl
lemma cast_commute [non_assoc_semiring α] (n : ℕ) (x : α) : commute ↑n x :=
nat.rec_on n (by rw [cast_zero]; exact commute.zero_left x) $
λ n ihn, by rw [cast_succ]; exact ihn.add_left (commute.one_left x)
lemma cast_comm [non_assoc_semiring α] (n : ℕ) (x : α) : (n : α) * x = x * n :=
(cast_commute n x).eq
lemma commute_cast [non_assoc_semiring α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) : commute x n :=
(n.cast_commute x).symm
section
variables [ordered_semiring α]
@[mono] theorem mono_cast : monotone (coe : ℕ → α) :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ $ λ n, by rw [nat.cast_succ]; exact le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one
@[simp] theorem cast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ (n : α) :=
@nat.cast_zero α _ ▸ mono_cast (nat.zero_le n)
variable [nontrivial α]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_le {m n : ℕ} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
strict_mono_cast.le_iff_le
@[simp, norm_cast, mono] theorem cast_lt {m n : ℕ} : (m : α) < n ↔ m < n :=
strict_mono_cast.lt_iff_lt
@[simp] theorem cast_pos {n : ℕ} : (0 : α) < n ↔ 0 < n :=
by rw [← cast_zero, cast_lt]
lemma cast_add_one_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < (n : α) + 1 :=
add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos n.cast_nonneg zero_lt_one
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem one_lt_cast {n : ℕ} : 1 < (n : α) ↔ 1 < n :=
by rw [← cast_one, cast_lt]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem one_le_cast {n : ℕ} : 1 ≤ (n : α) ↔ 1 ≤ n :=
by rw [← cast_one, cast_le]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_lt_one {n : ℕ} : (n : α) < 1 ↔ n = 0 :=
by rw [← cast_one, cast_lt, lt_succ_iff, le_zero_iff]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_le_one {n : ℕ} : (n : α) ≤ 1 ↔ n ≤ 1 :=
by rw [← cast_one, cast_le]
end
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_min [linear_ordered_semiring α] {a b : ℕ} :
(↑(min a b) : α) = min a b :=
(@mono_cast α _).map_min
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_max [linear_ordered_semiring α] {a b : ℕ} :
(↑(max a b) : α) = max a b :=
(@mono_cast α _).map_max
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem abs_cast [linear_ordered_ring α] (a : ℕ) :
|(a : α)| = a :=
abs_of_nonneg (cast_nonneg a)
lemma coe_nat_dvd [semiring α] {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∣ n) : (m : α) ∣ (n : α) :=
map_dvd (nat.cast_ring_hom α) h
alias coe_nat_dvd ← _root_.has_dvd.dvd.nat_cast
end nat
namespace prod
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [add_monoid_with_one α] [add_monoid_with_one β]
instance : add_monoid_with_one (α × β) :=
{ nat_cast := λ n, (n, n),
nat_cast_zero := congr_arg2 prod.mk nat.cast_zero nat.cast_zero,
nat_cast_succ := λ n, congr_arg2 prod.mk (nat.cast_succ _) (nat.cast_succ _),
.. prod.add_monoid, .. prod.has_one }
@[simp] lemma fst_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : (n : α × β).fst = n :=
by induction n; simp *
@[simp] lemma snd_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : (n : α × β).snd = n :=
by induction n; simp *
end prod
section add_monoid_hom_class
variables {A B F : Type*} [add_monoid_with_one B]
lemma ext_nat' [add_monoid A] [add_monoid_hom_class F ℕ A] (f g : F) (h : f 1 = g 1) : f = g :=
fun_like.ext f g $ begin
apply nat.rec,
{ simp only [nat.nat_zero_eq_zero, map_zero] },
simp [nat.succ_eq_add_one, h] {contextual := tt}
end
@[ext] lemma add_monoid_hom.ext_nat [add_monoid A] : ∀ {f g : ℕ →+ A}, ∀ h : f 1 = g 1, f = g :=
ext_nat'
variable [add_monoid_with_one A]
-- these versions are primed so that the `ring_hom_class` versions aren't
lemma eq_nat_cast' [add_monoid_hom_class F ℕ A] (f : F) (h1 : f 1 = 1) :
∀ n : ℕ, f n = n
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := by rw [map_add, h1, eq_nat_cast' n, nat.cast_add_one]
lemma map_nat_cast' {A} [add_monoid_with_one A] [add_monoid_hom_class F A B]
(f : F) (h : f 1 = 1) : ∀ (n : ℕ), f n = n
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := by rw [nat.cast_add, map_add, nat.cast_add, map_nat_cast', nat.cast_one, h, nat.cast_one]
end add_monoid_hom_class
section monoid_with_zero_hom_class
variables {A F : Type*} [mul_zero_one_class A]
/-- If two `monoid_with_zero_hom`s agree on the positive naturals they are equal. -/
theorem ext_nat'' [monoid_with_zero_hom_class F ℕ A] (f g : F)
(h_pos : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → f n = g n) : f = g :=
begin
apply fun_like.ext,
rintro (_|n),
{ simp },
exact h_pos n.succ_pos
end
@[ext] theorem monoid_with_zero_hom.ext_nat :
∀ {f g : ℕ →*₀ A}, (∀ {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → f n = g n) → f = g := ext_nat''
end monoid_with_zero_hom_class
section ring_hom_class
variables {R S F : Type*} [non_assoc_semiring R] [non_assoc_semiring S]
@[simp] lemma eq_nat_cast [ring_hom_class F ℕ R] (f : F) : ∀ n, f n = n :=
eq_nat_cast' f $ map_one f
@[simp] lemma map_nat_cast [ring_hom_class F R S] (f : F) : ∀ n : ℕ, f (n : R) = n :=
map_nat_cast' f $ map_one f
lemma ext_nat [ring_hom_class F ℕ R] (f g : F) : f = g :=
ext_nat' f g $ by simp only [map_one]
end ring_hom_class
namespace ring_hom
/-- This is primed to match `ring_hom.eq_int_cast'`. -/
lemma eq_nat_cast' {R} [non_assoc_semiring R] (f : ℕ →+* R) : f = nat.cast_ring_hom R :=
ring_hom.ext $ eq_nat_cast f
end ring_hom
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat.cast_id (n : ℕ) : ↑n = n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma nat.cast_ring_hom_nat : nat.cast_ring_hom ℕ = ring_hom.id ℕ := rfl
@[simp] theorem nat.cast_with_bot (n : ℕ) :
@coe ℕ (with_bot ℕ) (@coe_to_lift _ _ nat.cast_coe) n = n := rfl
-- I don't think `ring_hom_class` is good here, because of the `subsingleton` TC slowness
instance nat.unique_ring_hom {R : Type*} [non_assoc_semiring R] : unique (ℕ →+* R) :=
{ default := nat.cast_ring_hom R, uniq := ring_hom.eq_nat_cast' }
namespace mul_opposite
variables {α : Type*} [add_monoid_with_one α]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma op_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : op (n : α) = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma unop_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : unop (n : αᵐᵒᵖ) = n := rfl
end mul_opposite
namespace with_top
variables {α : Type*}
variables [add_monoid_with_one α]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nat : ∀ (n : ℕ), ((n : α) : with_top α) = n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by { push_cast, rw [coe_nat n] }
@[simp] lemma nat_ne_top (n : nat) : (n : with_top α) ≠ ⊤ :=
by { rw [←coe_nat n], apply coe_ne_top }
@[simp] lemma top_ne_nat (n : nat) : (⊤ : with_top α) ≠ n :=
by { rw [←coe_nat n], apply top_ne_coe }
lemma add_one_le_of_lt {i n : with_top ℕ} (h : i < n) : i + 1 ≤ n :=
begin
cases n, { exact le_top },
cases i, { exact (not_le_of_lt h le_top).elim },
exact with_top.coe_le_coe.2 (with_top.coe_lt_coe.1 h)
end
lemma one_le_iff_pos {n : with_top ℕ} : 1 ≤ n ↔ 0 < n :=
⟨lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one),
λ h, by simpa only [zero_add] using add_one_le_of_lt h⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma nat_induction {P : with_top ℕ → Prop} (a : with_top ℕ)
(h0 : P 0) (hsuc : ∀n:ℕ, P n → P n.succ) (htop : (∀n : ℕ, P n) → P ⊤) : P a :=
begin
have A : ∀n:ℕ, P n := λ n, nat.rec_on n h0 hsuc,
cases a,
{ exact htop A },
{ exact A a }
end
end with_top
namespace pi
variables {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, has_nat_cast (β a)]
instance : has_nat_cast (∀ a, β a) :=
by refine_struct { .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
lemma nat_apply (n : ℕ) (a : α) : (n : ∀ a, β a) a = n := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (n : ∀ a, β a) = λ _, n := rfl
end pi
namespace pi
variables {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, add_monoid_with_one (β a)]
instance : add_monoid_with_one (∀ a, β a) :=
by refine_struct { .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
end pi
|
5ec0866efc6ef682ecb7158d25877730bb744283 | 64874bd1010548c7f5a6e3e8902efa63baaff785 | /tests/lean/run/eq23.lean | e1a44aafcee00c40ab5a3070d9d0567a0cae7bc4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | tjiaqi/lean | 4634d729795c164664d10d093f3545287c76628f | d0ce4cf62f4246b0600c07e074d86e51f2195e30 | refs/heads/master | 1,622,323,796,480 | 1,422,643,069,000 | 1,422,643,069,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 586 | lean | open nat
inductive tree (A : Type) :=
leaf : A → tree A,
node : tree_list A → tree A
with tree_list :=
nil : tree_list A,
cons : tree A → tree_list A → tree_list A
namespace tree_list
definition len {A : Type} : tree_list A → nat,
len (nil A) := 0,
len (cons t l) := len l + 1
theorem len_nil {A : Type} : len (nil A) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem len_cons {A : Type} (t : tree A) (l : tree_list A) : len (cons t l) = len l + 1 :=
rfl
variables (A : Type) (t1 t2 t3 : tree A)
example : len (cons t1 (cons t2 (cons t3 (nil A)))) = 3 :=
rfl
print definition len
end tree_list
|
8b304b98710e997f02f2e9970901651dfeaf6738 | 947b78d97130d56365ae2ec264df196ce769371a | /src/Lean/Expr.lean | 96029827b6bb6d66a0d3a9a658b244a9db2dd335 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shyamalschandra/lean4 | 27044812be8698f0c79147615b1d5090b9f4b037 | 6e7a883b21eaf62831e8111b251dc9b18f40e604 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,417,126,371 | 1,601,859,995,000 | 1,601,860,020,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 36,868 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Data.KVMap
import Lean.Level
namespace Lean
inductive Literal
| natVal (val : Nat)
| strVal (val : String)
instance Literal.inhabited : Inhabited Literal := ⟨Literal.natVal 0⟩
def Literal.hash : Literal → USize
| Literal.natVal v => hash v
| Literal.strVal v => hash v
instance Literal.hashable : Hashable Literal := ⟨Literal.hash⟩
def Literal.beq : Literal → Literal → Bool
| Literal.natVal v₁, Literal.natVal v₂ => v₁ == v₂
| Literal.strVal v₁, Literal.strVal v₂ => v₁ == v₂
| _, _ => false
instance Literal.hasBeq : HasBeq Literal := ⟨Literal.beq⟩
def Literal.lt : Literal → Literal → Bool
| Literal.natVal _, Literal.strVal _ => true
| Literal.natVal v₁, Literal.natVal v₂ => v₁ < v₂
| Literal.strVal v₁, Literal.strVal v₂ => v₁ < v₂
| _, _ => false
instance Literal.hasLess : HasLess Literal := ⟨fun a b => a.lt b⟩
inductive BinderInfo
| default | implicit | strictImplicit | instImplicit | auxDecl
def BinderInfo.hash : BinderInfo → USize
| BinderInfo.default => 947
| BinderInfo.implicit => 1019
| BinderInfo.strictImplicit => 1087
| BinderInfo.instImplicit => 1153
| BinderInfo.auxDecl => 1229
def BinderInfo.isExplicit : BinderInfo → Bool
| BinderInfo.implicit => false
| BinderInfo.strictImplicit => false
| BinderInfo.instImplicit => false
| _ => true
instance BinderInfo.hashable : Hashable BinderInfo := ⟨BinderInfo.hash⟩
instance BinderInfo.inhabited : Inhabited BinderInfo := ⟨BinderInfo.default⟩
def BinderInfo.isInstImplicit : BinderInfo → Bool
| BinderInfo.instImplicit => true
| _ => false
def BinderInfo.isAuxDecl : BinderInfo → Bool
| BinderInfo.auxDecl => true
| _ => false
protected def BinderInfo.beq : BinderInfo → BinderInfo → Bool
| BinderInfo.default, BinderInfo.default => true
| BinderInfo.implicit, BinderInfo.implicit => true
| BinderInfo.strictImplicit, BinderInfo.strictImplicit => true
| BinderInfo.instImplicit, BinderInfo.instImplicit => true
| BinderInfo.auxDecl, BinderInfo.auxDecl => true
| _, _ => false
instance BinderInfo.hasBeq : HasBeq BinderInfo := ⟨BinderInfo.beq⟩
abbrev MData := KVMap
abbrev MData.empty : MData := {}
/--
Cached hash code, cached results, and other data for `Expr`.
hash : 32-bits
hasFVar : 1-bit
hasExprMVar : 1-bit
hasLevelMVar : 1-bit
hasLevelParam : 1-bit
nonDepLet : 1-bit
binderInfo : 3-bits
looseBVarRange : 24-bits -/
def Expr.Data := UInt64
instance Expr.Data.inhabited : Inhabited Expr.Data :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited UInt64)
def Expr.Data.hash (c : Expr.Data) : USize :=
c.toUInt32.toUSize
instance Expr.Data.hasBeq : HasBeq Expr.Data :=
⟨fun (a b : UInt64) => a == b⟩
def Expr.Data.looseBVarRange (c : Expr.Data) : UInt32 :=
(c.shiftRight 40).toUInt32
def Expr.Data.hasFVar (c : Expr.Data) : Bool :=
((c.shiftRight 32).land 1) == 1
def Expr.Data.hasExprMVar (c : Expr.Data) : Bool :=
((c.shiftRight 33).land 1) == 1
def Expr.Data.hasLevelMVar (c : Expr.Data) : Bool :=
((c.shiftRight 34).land 1) == 1
def Expr.Data.hasLevelParam (c : Expr.Data) : Bool :=
((c.shiftRight 35).land 1) == 1
def Expr.Data.nonDepLet (c : Expr.Data) : Bool :=
((c.shiftRight 36).land 1) == 1
@[extern c inline "(uint8_t)((#1 << 24) >> 61)"]
def Expr.Data.binderInfo (c : Expr.Data) : BinderInfo :=
let bi := (c.shiftLeft 24).shiftRight 61;
if bi == 0 then BinderInfo.default
else if bi == 1 then BinderInfo.implicit
else if bi == 2 then BinderInfo.strictImplicit
else if bi == 3 then BinderInfo.instImplicit
else BinderInfo.auxDecl
@[extern c inline "(uint64_t)#1"]
def BinderInfo.toUInt64 : BinderInfo → UInt64
| BinderInfo.default => 0
| BinderInfo.implicit => 1
| BinderInfo.strictImplicit => 2
| BinderInfo.instImplicit => 3
| BinderInfo.auxDecl => 4
@[inline] private def Expr.mkDataCore
(h : USize) (looseBVarRange : Nat)
(hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam nonDepLet : Bool) (bi : BinderInfo)
: Expr.Data :=
if looseBVarRange > Nat.pow 2 24 - 1 then panic! "bound variable index is too big"
else
let r : UInt64 :=
h.toUInt32.toUInt64 +
hasFVar.toUInt64.shiftLeft 32 +
hasExprMVar.toUInt64.shiftLeft 33 +
hasLevelMVar.toUInt64.shiftLeft 34 +
hasLevelParam.toUInt64.shiftLeft 35 +
nonDepLet.toUInt64.shiftLeft 36 +
bi.toUInt64.shiftLeft 37 +
looseBVarRange.toUInt64.shiftLeft 40;
r
def Expr.mkData (h : USize) (looseBVarRange : Nat := 0) (hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam : Bool := false) : Expr.Data :=
Expr.mkDataCore h looseBVarRange hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam false BinderInfo.default
def Expr.mkDataForBinder (h : USize) (looseBVarRange : Nat) (hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam : Bool) (bi : BinderInfo) : Expr.Data :=
Expr.mkDataCore h looseBVarRange hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam false bi
def Expr.mkDataForLet (h : USize) (looseBVarRange : Nat) (hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam nonDepLet : Bool) : Expr.Data :=
Expr.mkDataCore h looseBVarRange hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam nonDepLet BinderInfo.default
open Expr
abbrev MVarId := Name
abbrev FVarId := Name
/- We use the `E` suffix (short for `Expr`) to avoid collision with keywords.
We considered using «...», but it is too inconvenient to use. -/
inductive Expr
| bvar : Nat → Data → Expr -- bound variables
| fvar : FVarId → Data → Expr -- free variables
| mvar : MVarId → Data → Expr -- meta variables
| sort : Level → Data → Expr -- Sort
| const : Name → List Level → Data → Expr -- constants
| app : Expr → Expr → Data → Expr -- application
| lam : Name → Expr → Expr → Data → Expr -- lambda abstraction
| forallE : Name → Expr → Expr → Data → Expr -- (dependent) arrow
| letE : Name → Expr → Expr → Expr → Data → Expr -- let expressions
| lit : Literal → Data → Expr -- literals
| mdata : MData → Expr → Data → Expr -- metadata
| proj : Name → Nat → Expr → Data → Expr -- projection
-- IMPORTANT: the following constructor will be deleted
| localE : Name → Name → Expr → Data → Expr -- Lean2 legacy. TODO: delete
namespace Expr
instance : Inhabited Expr :=
⟨sort (arbitrary _) (arbitrary _)⟩
@[inline] def data : Expr → Data
| bvar _ d => d
| fvar _ d => d
| mvar _ d => d
| sort _ d => d
| const _ _ d => d
| app _ _ d => d
| lam _ _ _ d => d
| forallE _ _ _ d => d
| letE _ _ _ _ d => d
| lit _ d => d
| mdata _ _ d => d
| proj _ _ _ d => d
| localE _ _ _ d => d
def ctorName : Expr → String
| bvar _ _ => "bvar"
| fvar _ _ => "fvar"
| mvar _ _ => "mvar"
| sort _ _ => "sort"
| const _ _ _ => "const"
| app _ _ _ => "app"
| lam _ _ _ _ => "lam"
| forallE _ _ _ _ => "forallE"
| letE _ _ _ _ _ => "letE"
| lit _ _ => "lit"
| mdata _ _ _ => "mdata"
| proj _ _ _ _ => "proj"
| localE _ _ _ _ => "localE"
def hash (e : Expr) : USize :=
e.data.hash
instance : Hashable Expr := ⟨Expr.hash⟩
def hasFVar (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.data.hasFVar
def hasExprMVar (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.data.hasExprMVar
def hasLevelMVar (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.data.hasLevelMVar
def hasMVar (e : Expr) : Bool :=
let d := e.data;
d.hasExprMVar || d.hasLevelMVar
def hasLevelParam (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.data.hasLevelParam
def looseBVarRange (e : Expr) : Nat :=
e.data.looseBVarRange.toNat
def binderInfo (e : Expr) : BinderInfo :=
e.data.binderInfo
@[export lean_expr_hash] def hashEx : Expr → USize := hash
@[export lean_expr_has_fvar] def hasFVarEx : Expr → Bool := hasFVar
@[export lean_expr_has_expr_mvar] def hasExprMVarEx : Expr → Bool := hasExprMVar
@[export lean_expr_has_level_mvar] def hasLevelMVarEx : Expr → Bool := hasLevelMVar
@[export lean_expr_has_mvar] def hasMVarEx : Expr → Bool := hasMVar
@[export lean_expr_has_level_param] def hasLevelParamEx : Expr → Bool := hasLevelParam
@[export lean_expr_loose_bvar_range] def looseBVarRangeEx (e : Expr) : UInt32 := e.data.looseBVarRange
@[export lean_expr_binder_info] def binderInfoEx : Expr → BinderInfo := binderInfo
end Expr
def mkLit (l : Literal) : Expr :=
Expr.lit l $ mkData (mixHash 3 (hash l))
def mkNatLit (n : Nat) : Expr :=
mkLit (Literal.natVal n)
def mkStrLit (s : String) : Expr :=
mkLit (Literal.strVal s)
def mkConst (n : Name) (lvls : List Level := []) : Expr :=
Expr.const n lvls $ mkData (mixHash 5 $ mixHash (hash n) (hash lvls)) 0 false false (lvls.any Level.hasMVar) (lvls.any Level.hasParam)
def Literal.type : Literal → Expr
| Literal.natVal _ => mkConst `Nat
| Literal.strVal _ => mkConst `String
@[export lean_lit_type]
def Literal.typeEx : Literal → Expr := Literal.type
def mkBVar (idx : Nat) : Expr :=
Expr.bvar idx $ mkData (mixHash 7 $ hash idx) (idx+1)
def mkSort (lvl : Level) : Expr :=
Expr.sort lvl $ mkData (mixHash 11 $ hash lvl) 0 false false lvl.hasMVar lvl.hasParam
def mkFVar (fvarId : FVarId) : Expr :=
Expr.fvar fvarId $ mkData (mixHash 13 $ hash fvarId) 0 true
def mkMVar (fvarId : MVarId) : Expr :=
Expr.mvar fvarId $ mkData (mixHash 17 $ hash fvarId) 0 false true
def mkMData (d : MData) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
Expr.mdata d e $ mkData (mixHash 19 $ hash e) e.looseBVarRange e.hasFVar e.hasExprMVar e.hasLevelMVar e.hasLevelParam
def mkProj (s : Name) (i : Nat) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
Expr.proj s i e $ mkData (mixHash 23 $ mixHash (hash s) $ mixHash (hash i) (hash e))
e.looseBVarRange e.hasFVar e.hasExprMVar e.hasLevelMVar e.hasLevelParam
def mkApp (f a : Expr) : Expr :=
Expr.app f a $ mkData (mixHash 29 $ mixHash (hash f) (hash a))
(Nat.max f.looseBVarRange a.looseBVarRange)
(f.hasFVar || a.hasFVar)
(f.hasExprMVar || a.hasExprMVar)
(f.hasLevelMVar || a.hasLevelMVar)
(f.hasLevelParam || a.hasLevelParam)
def mkLambda (x : Name) (bi : BinderInfo) (t : Expr) (b : Expr) : Expr :=
-- let x := x.eraseMacroScopes;
Expr.lam x t b $ mkDataForBinder (mixHash 31 $ mixHash (hash t) (hash b))
(Nat.max t.looseBVarRange (b.looseBVarRange - 1))
(t.hasFVar || b.hasFVar)
(t.hasExprMVar || b.hasExprMVar)
(t.hasLevelMVar || b.hasLevelMVar)
(t.hasLevelParam || b.hasLevelParam)
bi
def mkForall (x : Name) (bi : BinderInfo) (t : Expr) (b : Expr) : Expr :=
-- let x := x.eraseMacroScopes;
Expr.forallE x t b $ mkDataForBinder (mixHash 37 $ mixHash (hash t) (hash b))
(Nat.max t.looseBVarRange (b.looseBVarRange - 1))
(t.hasFVar || b.hasFVar)
(t.hasExprMVar || b.hasExprMVar)
(t.hasLevelMVar || b.hasLevelMVar)
(t.hasLevelParam || b.hasLevelParam)
bi
/- Return `Unit -> type` -/
def mkThunkType (type : Expr) : Expr :=
mkForall Name.anonymous BinderInfo.default (Lean.mkConst `Unit) type
/- Return `fun (_ : Unit), e` -/
def mkThunk (type : Expr) : Expr :=
mkLambda `_ BinderInfo.default (Lean.mkConst `Unit) type
def mkLet (x : Name) (t : Expr) (v : Expr) (b : Expr) (nonDep : Bool := false) : Expr :=
-- let x := x.eraseMacroScopes;
Expr.letE x t v b $ mkDataForLet (mixHash 41 $ mixHash (hash t) $ mixHash (hash v) (hash b))
(Nat.max (Nat.max t.looseBVarRange v.looseBVarRange) (b.looseBVarRange - 1))
(t.hasFVar || v.hasFVar || b.hasFVar)
(t.hasExprMVar || v.hasExprMVar || b.hasExprMVar)
(t.hasLevelMVar || v.hasLevelMVar || b.hasLevelMVar)
(t.hasLevelParam || v.hasLevelParam || b.hasLevelParam)
nonDep
-- TODO: delete
def mkLocal (x u : Name) (t : Expr) (bi : BinderInfo) : Expr :=
Expr.localE x u t $ mkDataForBinder (mixHash 43 $ hash t) t.looseBVarRange true t.hasExprMVar t.hasLevelMVar t.hasLevelParam bi
@[export lean_expr_mk_bvar] def mkBVarEx : Nat → Expr := mkBVar
@[export lean_expr_mk_fvar] def mkFVarEx : FVarId → Expr := mkFVar
@[export lean_expr_mk_mvar] def mkMVarEx : MVarId → Expr := mkMVar
@[export lean_expr_mk_sort] def mkSortEx : Level → Expr := mkSort
@[export lean_expr_mk_const] def mkConstEx (c : Name) (lvls : List Level) : Expr := mkConst c lvls
@[export lean_expr_mk_app] def mkAppEx : Expr → Expr → Expr := mkApp
@[export lean_expr_mk_lambda] def mkLambdaEx (n : Name) (d b : Expr) (bi : BinderInfo) : Expr := mkLambda n bi d b
@[export lean_expr_mk_forall] def mkForallEx (n : Name) (d b : Expr) (bi : BinderInfo) : Expr := mkForall n bi d b
@[export lean_expr_mk_let] def mkLetEx (n : Name) (t v b : Expr) : Expr := mkLet n t v b
@[export lean_expr_mk_lit] def mkLitEx : Literal → Expr := mkLit
@[export lean_expr_mk_mdata] def mkMDataEx : MData → Expr → Expr := mkMData
@[export lean_expr_mk_proj] def mkProjEx : Name → Nat → Expr → Expr := mkProj
@[export lean_expr_mk_local] def mkLocalEx : Name → Name → Expr → BinderInfo → Expr := mkLocal
def mkAppN (f : Expr) (args : Array Expr) : Expr :=
args.foldl mkApp f
private partial def mkAppRangeAux (n : Nat) (args : Array Expr) : Nat → Expr → Expr
| i, e => if i < n then mkAppRangeAux (i+1) (mkApp e (args.get! i)) else e
/-- `mkAppRange f i j #[a_1, ..., a_i, ..., a_j, ... ]` ==> the expression `f a_i ... a_{j-1}` -/
def mkAppRange (f : Expr) (i j : Nat) (args : Array Expr) : Expr :=
mkAppRangeAux j args i f
def mkAppRev (fn : Expr) (revArgs : Array Expr) : Expr :=
revArgs.foldr (fun a r => mkApp r a) fn
namespace Expr
-- TODO: implement it in Lean
@[extern "lean_expr_dbg_to_string"]
constant dbgToString (e : @& Expr) : String := arbitrary String
@[extern "lean_expr_quick_lt"]
constant quickLt (a : @& Expr) (b : @& Expr) : Bool := arbitrary _
@[extern "lean_expr_lt"]
constant lt (a : @& Expr) (b : @& Expr) : Bool := arbitrary _
/- Return true iff `a` and `b` are alpha equivalent.
Binder annotations are ignored. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_eqv"]
constant eqv (a : @& Expr) (b : @& Expr) : Bool := arbitrary _
instance : HasBeq Expr := ⟨Expr.eqv⟩
/- Return true iff `a` and `b` are equal.
Binder names and annotations are taking into account. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_equal"]
constant equal (a : @& Expr) (b : @& Expr) : Bool := arbitrary _
def isSort : Expr → Bool
| sort _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isBVar : Expr → Bool
| bvar _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isMVar : Expr → Bool
| mvar _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isFVar : Expr → Bool
| fvar _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isApp : Expr → Bool
| app _ _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isProj : Expr → Bool
| proj _ _ _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isConst : Expr → Bool
| const _ _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isConstOf : Expr → Name → Bool
| const n _ _, m => n == m
| _, _ => false
def isForall : Expr → Bool
| forallE _ _ _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isLambda : Expr → Bool
| lam _ _ _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isBinding : Expr → Bool
| lam _ _ _ _ => true
| forallE _ _ _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isLet : Expr → Bool
| letE _ _ _ _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isMData : Expr → Bool
| mdata _ _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isLit : Expr → Bool
| lit _ _ => true
| _ => false
def getAppFn : Expr → Expr
| app f a _ => getAppFn f
| e => e
def getAppNumArgsAux : Expr → Nat → Nat
| app f a _, n => getAppNumArgsAux f (n+1)
| e, n => n
def getAppNumArgs (e : Expr) : Nat :=
getAppNumArgsAux e 0
private def getAppArgsAux : Expr → Array Expr → Nat → Array Expr
| app f a _, as, i => getAppArgsAux f (as.set! i a) (i-1)
| _, as, _ => as
@[inline] def getAppArgs (e : Expr) : Array Expr :=
let dummy := mkSort levelZero;
let nargs := e.getAppNumArgs;
getAppArgsAux e (mkArray nargs dummy) (nargs-1)
private def getAppRevArgsAux : Expr → Array Expr → Array Expr
| app f a _, as => getAppRevArgsAux f (as.push a)
| _, as => as
@[inline] def getAppRevArgs (e : Expr) : Array Expr :=
getAppRevArgsAux e (Array.mkEmpty e.getAppNumArgs)
@[specialize] def withAppAux {α} (k : Expr → Array Expr → α) : Expr → Array Expr → Nat → α
| app f a _, as, i => withAppAux f (as.set! i a) (i-1)
| f, as, i => k f as
@[inline] def withApp {α} (e : Expr) (k : Expr → Array Expr → α) : α :=
let dummy := mkSort levelZero;
let nargs := e.getAppNumArgs;
withAppAux k e (mkArray nargs dummy) (nargs-1)
@[specialize] private def withAppRevAux {α} (k : Expr → Array Expr → α) : Expr → Array Expr → α
| app f a _, as => withAppRevAux f (as.push a)
| f, as => k f as
@[inline] def withAppRev {α} (e : Expr) (k : Expr → Array Expr → α) : α :=
withAppRevAux k e (Array.mkEmpty e.getAppNumArgs)
def getRevArgD : Expr → Nat → Expr → Expr
| app f a _, 0, _ => a
| app f _ _, i+1, v => getRevArgD f i v
| _, _, v => v
def getRevArg! : Expr → Nat → Expr
| app f a _, 0 => a
| app f _ _, i+1 => getRevArg! f i
| _, _ => panic! "invalid index"
@[inline] def getArg! (e : Expr) (i : Nat) (n := e.getAppNumArgs) : Expr :=
getRevArg! e (n - i - 1)
@[inline] def getArgD (e : Expr) (i : Nat) (v₀ : Expr) (n := e.getAppNumArgs) : Expr :=
getRevArgD e (n - i - 1) v₀
def isAppOf (e : Expr) (n : Name) : Bool :=
match e.getAppFn with
| const c _ _ => c == n
| _ => false
def isAppOfArity : Expr → Name → Nat → Bool
| const c _ _, n, 0 => c == n
| app f _ _, n, a+1 => isAppOfArity f n a
| _, _, _ => false
def appFn! : Expr → Expr
| app f _ _ => f
| _ => panic! "application expected"
def appArg! : Expr → Expr
| app _ a _ => a
| _ => panic! "application expected"
def isNatLit : Expr → Bool
| lit (Literal.natVal _) _ => true
| _ => false
def natLit? : Expr → Option Nat
| lit (Literal.natVal v) _ => v
| _ => none
def isStringLit : Expr → Bool
| lit (Literal.strVal _) _ => true
| _ => false
def isCharLit (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.isAppOfArity `Char.ofNat 1 && e.appArg!.isNatLit
def constName! : Expr → Name
| const n _ _ => n
| _ => panic! "constant expected"
def constName? : Expr → Option Name
| const n _ _ => some n
| _ => none
def constLevels! : Expr → List Level
| const _ ls _ => ls
| _ => panic! "constant expected"
def bvarIdx! : Expr → Nat
| bvar idx _ => idx
| _ => panic! "bvar expected"
def fvarId! : Expr → FVarId
| fvar n _ => n
| _ => panic! "fvar expected"
def mvarId! : Expr → MVarId
| mvar n _ => n
| _ => panic! "mvar expected"
def bindingName! : Expr → Name
| forallE n _ _ _ => n
| lam n _ _ _ => n
| _ => panic! "binding expected"
def bindingDomain! : Expr → Expr
| forallE _ d _ _ => d
| lam _ d _ _ => d
| _ => panic! "binding expected"
def bindingBody! : Expr → Expr
| forallE _ _ b _ => b
| lam _ _ b _ => b
| _ => panic! "binding expected"
def bindingInfo! : Expr → BinderInfo
| forallE _ _ _ c => c.binderInfo
| lam _ _ _ c => c.binderInfo
| _ => panic! "binding expected"
def letName! : Expr → Name
| letE n _ _ _ _ => n
| _ => panic! "let expression expected"
def consumeMData : Expr → Expr
| mdata _ e _ => consumeMData e
| e => e
def hasLooseBVars (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.looseBVarRange > 0
@[extern "lean_expr_has_loose_bvar"]
constant hasLooseBVar (e : @& Expr) (bvarIdx : @& Nat) : Bool := arbitrary _
/-- Return true if `e` contains the loose bound variable `bvarIdx` in an explicit parameter, or in the range if `tryRange == true`. -/
def hasLooseBVarInExplicitDomain : Expr → Nat → Bool → Bool
| Expr.forallE _ d b c, bvarIdx, tryRange => (c.binderInfo.isExplicit && hasLooseBVar d bvarIdx) || hasLooseBVarInExplicitDomain b (bvarIdx+1) tryRange
| e, bvarIdx, tryRange => tryRange && hasLooseBVar e bvarIdx
/--
Lower the loose bound variables `>= s` in `e` by `d`.
That is, a loose bound variable `bvar i`.
`i >= s` is mapped into `bvar (i-d)`.
Remark: if `s < d`, then result is `e` -/
@[extern "lean_expr_lower_loose_bvars"]
constant lowerLooseBVars (e : @& Expr) (s d : @& Nat) : Expr := arbitrary _
/--
Lift loose bound variables `>= s` in `e` by `d`. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_lift_loose_bvars"]
constant liftLooseBVars (e : @& Expr) (s d : @& Nat) : Expr := arbitrary _
/--
`inferImplicit e numParams considerRange` updates the first `numParams` parameter binder annotations of the `e` forall type.
It marks any parameter with an explicit binder annotation if there is another explicit arguments that depends on it or
the resulting type if `considerRange == true`.
Remark: we use this function to infer the bind annotations of inductive datatype constructors, and structure projections.
When the `{}` annotation is used in these commands, we set `considerRange == false`.
-/
def inferImplicit : Expr → Nat → Bool → Expr
| Expr.forallE n d b c, i+1, considerRange =>
let b := inferImplicit b i considerRange;
let newInfo := if c.binderInfo.isExplicit && hasLooseBVarInExplicitDomain b 0 considerRange then BinderInfo.implicit else c.binderInfo;
mkForall n newInfo d b
| e, 0, _ => e
| e, _, _ => e
/-- Instantiate the loose bound variables in `e` using `subst`.
That is, a loose `Expr.bvar i` is replaced with `subst[i]`. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_instantiate"]
constant instantiate (e : @& Expr) (subst : @& Array Expr) : Expr := arbitrary _
@[extern "lean_expr_instantiate1"]
constant instantiate1 (e : @& Expr) (subst : @& Expr) : Expr := arbitrary _
/-- Similar to instantiate, but `Expr.bvar i` is replaced with `subst[subst.size - i - 1]` -/
@[extern "lean_expr_instantiate_rev"]
constant instantiateRev (e : @& Expr) (subst : @& Array Expr) : Expr := arbitrary _
/-- Similar to `instantiate`, but consider only the variables `xs` in the range `[beginIdx, endIdx)`.
Function panics if `beginIdx <= endIdx <= xs.size` does not hold. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_instantiate_range"]
constant instantiateRange (e : @& Expr) (beginIdx endIdx : @& Nat) (xs : @& Array Expr) : Expr := arbitrary _
/-- Similar to `instantiateRev`, but consider only the variables `xs` in the range `[beginIdx, endIdx)`.
Function panics if `beginIdx <= endIdx <= xs.size` does not hold. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_instantiate_rev_range"]
constant instantiateRevRange (e : @& Expr) (beginIdx endIdx : @& Nat) (xs : @& Array Expr) : Expr := arbitrary _
/-- Replace free variables `xs` with loose bound variables. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_abstract"]
constant abstract (e : @& Expr) (xs : @& Array Expr) : Expr := arbitrary _
/-- Similar to `abstract`, but consider only the first `min n xs.size` entries in `xs`. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_abstract_range"]
constant abstractRange (e : @& Expr) (n : @& Nat) (xs : @& Array Expr) : Expr := arbitrary _
/-- Replace occurrences of the free variable `fvar` in `e` with `v` -/
def replaceFVar (e : Expr) (fvar : Expr) (v : Expr) : Expr :=
(e.abstract #[fvar]).instantiate1 v
/-- Replace occurrences of the free variable `fvarId` in `e` with `v` -/
def replaceFVarId (e : Expr) (fvarId : FVarId) (v : Expr) : Expr :=
replaceFVar e (mkFVar fvarId) v
/-- Replace occurrences of the free variables `fvars` in `e` with `vs` -/
def replaceFVars (e : Expr) (fvars : Array Expr) (vs : Array Expr) : Expr :=
(e.abstract fvars).instantiateRev vs
instance : HasToString Expr :=
⟨Expr.dbgToString⟩
-- TODO: should not use dbgToString, but constructors.
instance : HasRepr Expr :=
⟨Expr.dbgToString⟩
def isAtomic : Expr → Bool
| Expr.const _ _ _ => true
| Expr.sort _ _ => true
| Expr.bvar _ _ => true
| Expr.lit _ _ => true
| Expr.mvar _ _ => true
| Expr.fvar _ _ => true
| _ => false
end Expr
def mkAppB (f a b : Expr) := mkApp (mkApp f a) b
def mkApp2 (f a b : Expr) := mkAppB f a b
def mkApp3 (f a b c : Expr) := mkApp (mkAppB f a b) c
def mkApp4 (f a b c d : Expr) := mkAppB (mkAppB f a b) c d
def mkApp5 (f a b c d e : Expr) := mkApp (mkApp4 f a b c d) e
def mkApp6 (f a b c d e₁ e₂ : Expr) := mkAppB (mkApp4 f a b c d) e₁ e₂
def mkApp7 (f a b c d e₁ e₂ e₃ : Expr) := mkApp3 (mkApp4 f a b c d) e₁ e₂ e₃
def mkApp8 (f a b c d e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄ : Expr) := mkApp4 (mkApp4 f a b c d) e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄
def mkApp9 (f a b c d e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄ e₅ : Expr) := mkApp5 (mkApp4 f a b c d) e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄ e₅
def mkApp10 (f a b c d e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄ e₅ e₆ : Expr) := mkApp6 (mkApp4 f a b c d) e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄ e₅ e₆
def mkDecIsTrue (pred proof : Expr) :=
mkAppB (mkConst `Decidable.isTrue) pred proof
def mkDecIsFalse (pred proof : Expr) :=
mkAppB (mkConst `Decidable.isFalse) pred proof
open Std (HashMap HashSet PHashMap PHashSet)
abbrev ExprMap (α : Type) := HashMap Expr α
abbrev PersistentExprMap (α : Type) := PHashMap Expr α
abbrev ExprSet := HashSet Expr
abbrev PersistentExprSet := PHashSet Expr
abbrev PExprSet := PersistentExprSet
/- Auxiliary type for forcing `==` to be structural equality for `Expr` -/
structure ExprStructEq :=
(val : Expr)
instance exprToExprStructEqOld : HasCoe Expr ExprStructEq := ⟨ExprStructEq.mk⟩
instance exprToExprStructEq : Coe Expr ExprStructEq := ⟨ExprStructEq.mk⟩
namespace ExprStructEq
protected def beq : ExprStructEq → ExprStructEq → Bool
| ⟨e₁⟩, ⟨e₂⟩ => Expr.equal e₁ e₂
protected def hash : ExprStructEq → USize
| ⟨e⟩ => e.hash
instance : Inhabited ExprStructEq := ⟨{ val := arbitrary _ }⟩
instance : HasBeq ExprStructEq := ⟨ExprStructEq.beq⟩
instance : Hashable ExprStructEq := ⟨ExprStructEq.hash⟩
instance : HasToString ExprStructEq := ⟨fun e => toString e.val⟩
instance : HasRepr ExprStructEq := ⟨fun e => repr e.val⟩
end ExprStructEq
abbrev ExprStructMap (α : Type) := HashMap ExprStructEq α
abbrev PersistentExprStructMap (α : Type) := PHashMap ExprStructEq α
namespace Expr
private partial def mkAppRevRangeAux (revArgs : Array Expr) (start : Nat) : Expr → Nat → Expr
| b, i =>
if i == start then b
else
let i := i - 1;
mkAppRevRangeAux (mkApp b (revArgs.get! i)) i
/-- `mkAppRevRange f b e args == mkAppRev f (revArgs.extract b e)` -/
def mkAppRevRange (f : Expr) (beginIdx endIdx : Nat) (revArgs : Array Expr) : Expr :=
mkAppRevRangeAux revArgs beginIdx f endIdx
private def betaRevAux (revArgs : Array Expr) (sz : Nat) : Expr → Nat → Expr
| Expr.lam _ _ b _, i =>
if i + 1 < sz then
betaRevAux b (i+1)
else
let n := sz - (i + 1);
mkAppRevRange (b.instantiateRange n sz revArgs) 0 n revArgs
| Expr.mdata _ b _, i => betaRevAux b i
| b, i =>
let n := sz - i;
mkAppRevRange (b.instantiateRange n sz revArgs) 0 n revArgs
/-- If `f` is a lambda expression, than "beta-reduce" it using `revArgs`.
This function is often used with `getAppRev` or `withAppRev`.
Examples:
- `betaRev (fun x y => t x y) #[]` ==> `fun x y => t x y`
- `betaRev (fun x y => t x y) #[a]` ==> `fun y => t a y`
- `betaRev (fun x y => t x y) #[a, b]` ==> t b a`
- `betaRev (fun x y => t x y) #[a, b, c, d]` ==> t d c b a`
Suppose `t` is `(fun x y => t x y) a b c d`, then
`args := t.getAppRev` is `#[d, c, b, a]`,
and `betaRev (fun x y => t x y) #[d, c, b, a]` is `t a b c d`. -/
def betaRev (f : Expr) (revArgs : Array Expr) : Expr :=
if revArgs.size == 0 then f
else betaRevAux revArgs revArgs.size f 0
def isHeadBetaTargetFn : Expr → Bool
| Expr.lam _ _ _ _ => true
| Expr.mdata _ b _ => isHeadBetaTargetFn b
| _ => false
def headBeta (e : Expr) : Expr :=
let f := e.getAppFn;
if f.isHeadBetaTargetFn then betaRev f e.getAppRevArgs else e
def isHeadBetaTarget (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.getAppFn.isHeadBetaTargetFn
private def etaExpandedBody : Expr → Nat → Nat → Option Expr
| app f (bvar j _) _, n+1, i => if j == i then etaExpandedBody f n (i+1) else none
| _, n+1, _ => none
| f, 0, _ => if f.hasLooseBVars then none else some f
private def etaExpandedAux : Expr → Nat → Option Expr
| lam _ _ b _, n => etaExpandedAux b (n+1)
| e, n => etaExpandedBody e n 0
/--
If `e` is of the form `(fun x₁ ... xₙ => f x₁ ... xₙ)` and `f` does not contain `x₁`, ..., `xₙ`,
then return `some f`. Otherwise, return `none`.
It assumes `e` does not have loose bound variables.
Remark: `ₙ` may be 0 -/
def etaExpanded? (e : Expr) : Option Expr :=
etaExpandedAux e 0
/-- Similar to `etaExpanded?`, but only succeeds if `ₙ ≥ 1`. -/
def etaExpandedStrict? : Expr → Option Expr
| lam _ _ b _ => etaExpandedAux b 1
| _ => none
def getOptParamDefault? (e : Expr) : Option Expr :=
if e.isAppOfArity `optParam 2 then
some e.appArg!
else
none
def getAutoParamTactic? (e : Expr) : Option Expr :=
if e.isAppOfArity `autoParam 2 then
some e.appArg!
else
none
def isOptParam (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.isAppOfArity `optParam 2
def isAutoParam (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.isAppOfArity `autoParam 2
@[specialize] private partial def hasAnyFVarAux (p : FVarId → Bool) : Expr → Bool
| e => if !e.hasFVar then false else
match e with
| Expr.forallE _ d b _ => hasAnyFVarAux d || hasAnyFVarAux b
| Expr.lam _ d b _ => hasAnyFVarAux d || hasAnyFVarAux b
| Expr.mdata _ e _ => hasAnyFVarAux e
| Expr.letE _ t v b _ => hasAnyFVarAux t || hasAnyFVarAux v || hasAnyFVarAux b
| Expr.app f a _ => hasAnyFVarAux f || hasAnyFVarAux a
| Expr.proj _ _ e _ => hasAnyFVarAux e
| Expr.localE _ _ _ _ => unreachable!
| e@(Expr.fvar fvarId _) => p fvarId
| e => false
/-- Return true iff `e` contains a free variable which statisfies `p`. -/
@[inline] def hasAnyFVar (e : Expr) (p : FVarId → Bool) : Bool :=
hasAnyFVarAux p e
/- The update functions here are defined using C code. They will try to avoid
allocating new values using pointer equality.
The hypotheses `(h : e.is... = true)` are used to ensure Lean will not crash
at runtime.
The `update*!` functions are inlined and provide a convenient way of using the
update proofs without providing proofs.
Note that if they are used under a match-expression, the compiler will eliminate
the double-match. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_update_app"]
def updateApp (e : Expr) (newFn : Expr) (newArg : Expr) (h : e.isApp = true) : Expr :=
mkApp newFn newArg
@[inline] def updateApp! (e : Expr) (newFn : Expr) (newArg : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| app fn arg c => updateApp (app fn arg c) newFn newArg rfl
| _ => panic! "application expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_const"]
def updateConst (e : Expr) (newLevels : List Level) (h : e.isConst = true) : Expr :=
mkConst e.constName! newLevels
@[inline] def updateConst! (e : Expr) (newLevels : List Level) : Expr :=
match e with
| const n ls c => updateConst (const n ls c) newLevels rfl
| _ => panic! "constant expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_sort"]
def updateSort (e : Expr) (newLevel : Level) (h : e.isSort = true) : Expr :=
mkSort newLevel
@[inline] def updateSort! (e : Expr) (newLevel : Level) : Expr :=
match e with
| sort l c => updateSort (sort l c) newLevel rfl
| _ => panic! "level expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_proj"]
def updateProj (e : Expr) (newExpr : Expr) (h : e.isProj = true) : Expr :=
match e with
| proj s i _ _ => mkProj s i newExpr
| _ => e -- unreachable because of `h`
@[extern "lean_expr_update_mdata"]
def updateMData (e : Expr) (newExpr : Expr) (h : e.isMData = true) : Expr :=
match e with
| mdata d _ _ => mkMData d newExpr
| _ => e -- unreachable because of `h`
@[inline] def updateMData! (e : Expr) (newExpr : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| mdata d e c => updateMData (mdata d e c) newExpr rfl
| _ => panic! "mdata expected"
@[inline] def updateProj! (e : Expr) (newExpr : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| proj s i e c => updateProj (proj s i e c) newExpr rfl
| _ => panic! "proj expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_forall"]
def updateForall (e : Expr) (newBinfo : BinderInfo) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) (h : e.isForall = true) : Expr :=
mkForall e.bindingName! newBinfo newDomain newBody
@[inline] def updateForall! (e : Expr) (newBinfo : BinderInfo) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| forallE n d b c => updateForall (forallE n d b c) newBinfo newDomain newBody rfl
| _ => panic! "forall expected"
@[inline] def updateForallE! (e : Expr) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| forallE n d b c => updateForall (forallE n d b c) c.binderInfo newDomain newBody rfl
| _ => panic! "forall expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_lambda"]
def updateLambda (e : Expr) (newBinfo : BinderInfo) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) (h : e.isLambda = true) : Expr :=
mkLambda e.bindingName! newBinfo newDomain newBody
@[inline] def updateLambda! (e : Expr) (newBinfo : BinderInfo) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| lam n d b c => updateLambda (lam n d b c) newBinfo newDomain newBody rfl
| _ => panic! "lambda expected"
@[inline] def updateLambdaE! (e : Expr) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| lam n d b c => updateLambda (lam n d b c) c.binderInfo newDomain newBody rfl
| _ => panic! "lambda expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_let"]
def updateLet (e : Expr) (newType : Expr) (newVal : Expr) (newBody : Expr) (h : e.isLet = true) : Expr :=
mkLet e.letName! newType newVal newBody
@[inline] def updateLet! (e : Expr) (newType : Expr) (newVal : Expr) (newBody : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| letE n t v b c => updateLet (letE n t v b c) newType newVal newBody rfl
| _ => panic! "let expression expected"
def updateFn : Expr → Expr → Expr
| e@(app f a _), g => e.updateApp (updateFn f g) a rfl
| _, g => g
/- Instantiate level parameters -/
namespace InstantiateLevelParams
@[inline] def visit (f : Expr → Expr) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
if e.hasLevelParam then f e else e
@[specialize] partial def instantiate (s : Name → Option Level) : Expr → Expr
| e@(lam n d b _) => e.updateLambdaE! (visit instantiate d) (visit instantiate b)
| e@(forallE n d b _) => e.updateForallE! (visit instantiate d) (visit instantiate b)
| e@(letE n t v b _) => e.updateLet! (visit instantiate t) (visit instantiate v) (visit instantiate b)
| e@(app f a _) => e.updateApp (visit instantiate f) (visit instantiate a) rfl
| e@(proj _ _ s _) => e.updateProj (visit instantiate s) rfl
| e@(mdata _ b _) => e.updateMData (visit instantiate b) rfl
| e@(const _ us _) => e.updateConst (us.map (fun u => u.instantiateParams s)) rfl
| e@(sort u _) => e.updateSort (u.instantiateParams s) rfl
| localE _ _ _ _ => unreachable!
| e => e
end InstantiateLevelParams
@[inline] def instantiateLevelParamsCore (s : Name → Option Level) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
if e.hasLevelParam then InstantiateLevelParams.instantiate s e else e
private def getParamSubst : List Name → List Level → Name → Option Level
| p::ps, u::us, p' => if p == p' then some u else getParamSubst ps us p'
| _, _, _ => none
def instantiateLevelParams (e : Expr) (paramNames : List Name) (lvls : List Level) : Expr :=
instantiateLevelParamsCore (getParamSubst paramNames lvls) e
private partial def getParamSubstArray (ps : Array Name) (us : Array Level) (p' : Name) : Nat → Option Level
| i =>
if h : i < ps.size then
let p := ps.get ⟨i, h⟩;
if h : i < us.size then
let u := us.get ⟨i, h⟩;
if p == p' then some u else getParamSubstArray (i+1)
else none
else none
def instantiateLevelParamsArray (e : Expr) (paramNames : Array Name) (lvls : Array Level) : Expr :=
instantiateLevelParamsCore (fun p => getParamSubstArray paramNames lvls p 0) e
end Expr
def mkAnnotation (kind : Name) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
mkMData (KVMap.empty.insert kind (DataValue.ofBool true)) e
def annotation? (kind : Name) (e : Expr) : Option Expr :=
match e with
| Expr.mdata d b _ => if d.size == 1 && d.getBool kind false then some b else none
| _ => none
def mkFreshFVarId {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadNameGenerator m] : m FVarId :=
mkFreshId
def mkFreshMVarId {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadNameGenerator m] : m FVarId :=
mkFreshId
end Lean
|
0b7efe31babb437c4753cc7d82c29c0d129c2543 | 737dc4b96c97368cb66b925eeea3ab633ec3d702 | /src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Induction.lean | e8e431d50fe18d34d0b9d75be8571c07cd913d76 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Bioye97/lean4 | 1ace34638efd9913dc5991443777b01a08983289 | bc3900cbb9adda83eed7e6affeaade7cfd07716d | refs/heads/master | 1,690,589,820,211 | 1,631,051,000,000 | 1,631,067,598,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,026 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Util.CollectFVars
import Lean.Parser.Term
import Lean.Meta.RecursorInfo
import Lean.Meta.CollectMVars
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.ElimInfo
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Induction
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Cases
import Lean.Meta.GeneralizeVars
import Lean.Elab.App
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.ElabTerm
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Generalize
namespace Lean.Elab.Tactic
open Meta
/-
Given an `inductionAlt` of the form
```
nodeWithAntiquot "inductionAlt" `Lean.Parser.Tactic.inductionAlt $ ident' >> many ident' >> darrow >> termParser
```
-/
private def getAltName (alt : Syntax) : Name :=
-- alt[1] is of the form (("@"? ident) <|> "_")
if alt[1].hasArgs then alt[1][1].getId.eraseMacroScopes else `_
private def altHasExplicitModifier (alt : Syntax) : Bool :=
alt[1].hasArgs && !alt[1][0].isNone
private def getAltVarNames (alt : Syntax) : Array Name :=
alt[2].getArgs.map getNameOfIdent'
private def getAltRHS (alt : Syntax) : Syntax :=
alt[4]
private def getAltDArrow (alt : Syntax) : Syntax :=
alt[3]
-- Return true if `stx` is a term occurring in the RHS of the induction/cases tactic
def isHoleRHS (rhs : Syntax) : Bool :=
rhs.isOfKind ``Parser.Term.syntheticHole || rhs.isOfKind ``Parser.Term.hole
def evalAlt (mvarId : MVarId) (alt : Syntax) (remainingGoals : Array MVarId) : TacticM (Array MVarId) :=
let rhs := getAltRHS alt
withCaseRef (getAltDArrow alt) rhs do
if isHoleRHS rhs then
let gs' ← withMVarContext mvarId $ withRef rhs do
let mvarDecl ← getMVarDecl mvarId
let val ← elabTermEnsuringType rhs mvarDecl.type
assignExprMVar mvarId val
let gs' ← getMVarsNoDelayed val
tagUntaggedGoals mvarDecl.userName `induction gs'.toList
pure gs'
return remainingGoals ++ gs'
else
setGoals [mvarId]
closeUsingOrAdmit (withTacticInfoContext alt (evalTactic rhs))
return remainingGoals
/-
Helper method for creating an user-defined eliminator/recursor application.
-/
namespace ElimApp
structure Context where
elimInfo : ElimInfo
targets : Array Expr -- targets provided by the user
structure State where
argPos : Nat := 0 -- current argument position
targetPos : Nat := 0 -- current target at targetsStx
f : Expr
fType : Expr
alts : Array (Name × MVarId) := #[]
insts : Array MVarId := #[]
abbrev M := ReaderT Context $ StateRefT State TermElabM
private def addNewArg (arg : Expr) : M Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with argPos := s.argPos+1, f := mkApp s.f arg, fType := s.fType.bindingBody!.instantiate1 arg }
/- Return the binder name at `fType`. This method assumes `fType` is a function type. -/
private def getBindingName : M Name := return (← get).fType.bindingName!
/- Return the next argument expected type. This method assumes `fType` is a function type. -/
private def getArgExpectedType : M Expr := return (← get).fType.bindingDomain!
private def getFType : M Expr := do
let fType ← whnfForall (← get).fType
modify fun s => { s with fType := fType }
pure fType
structure Result where
elimApp : Expr
alts : Array (Name × MVarId) := #[]
others : Array MVarId := #[]
/--
Construct the an eliminator/recursor application. `targets` contains the explicit and implicit targets for
the eliminator. For example, the indices of builtin recursors are considered implicit targets.
Remark: the method `addImplicitTargets` may be used to compute the sequence of implicit and explicit targets
from the explicit ones.
-/
partial def mkElimApp (elimName : Name) (elimInfo : ElimInfo) (targets : Array Expr) (tag : Name) : TermElabM Result := do
let rec loop : M Unit := do
match (← getFType) with
| Expr.forallE binderName _ _ c =>
let ctx ← read
let argPos := (← get).argPos
if ctx.elimInfo.motivePos == argPos then
let motive ← mkFreshExprMVar (← getArgExpectedType) MetavarKind.syntheticOpaque
addNewArg motive
else if ctx.elimInfo.targetsPos.contains argPos then
let s ← get
let ctx ← read
unless s.targetPos < ctx.targets.size do
throwError "insufficient number of targets for '{elimName}'"
let target := ctx.targets[s.targetPos]
let expectedType ← getArgExpectedType
let target ← Term.ensureHasType expectedType target
modify fun s => { s with targetPos := s.targetPos + 1 }
addNewArg target
else match c.binderInfo with
| BinderInfo.implicit =>
let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar (← getArgExpectedType)
addNewArg arg
| BinderInfo.strictImplicit =>
let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar (← getArgExpectedType)
addNewArg arg
| BinderInfo.instImplicit =>
let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar (← getArgExpectedType) (kind := MetavarKind.synthetic) (userName := appendTag tag binderName)
modify fun s => { s with insts := s.insts.push arg.mvarId! }
addNewArg arg
| _ =>
let arg ← mkFreshExprSyntheticOpaqueMVar (← getArgExpectedType) (tag := appendTag tag binderName)
let x ← getBindingName
modify fun s => { s with alts := s.alts.push (x, arg.mvarId!) }
addNewArg arg
loop
| _ =>
pure ()
let f ← Term.mkConst elimName
let fType ← inferType f
let (_, s) ← loop.run { elimInfo := elimInfo, targets := targets } |>.run { f := f, fType := fType }
let mut others := #[]
for mvarId in s.insts do
try
unless (← Term.synthesizeInstMVarCore mvarId) do
setMVarKind mvarId MetavarKind.syntheticOpaque
others := others.push mvarId
catch _ =>
setMVarKind mvarId MetavarKind.syntheticOpaque
others := others.push mvarId
return { elimApp := (← instantiateMVars s.f), alts := s.alts, others := others }
/- Given a goal `... targets ... |- C[targets]` associated with `mvarId`, assign
`motiveArg := fun targets => C[targets]` -/
def setMotiveArg (mvarId : MVarId) (motiveArg : MVarId) (targets : Array FVarId) : MetaM Unit := do
let type ← inferType (mkMVar mvarId)
let motive ← mkLambdaFVars (targets.map mkFVar) type
let motiverInferredType ← inferType motive
let motiveType ← inferType (mkMVar motiveArg)
unless (← isDefEqGuarded motiverInferredType motiveType) do
throwError "type mismatch when assigning motive{indentExpr motive}\n{← mkHasTypeButIsExpectedMsg motiverInferredType motiveType}"
assignExprMVar motiveArg motive
private def getAltNumFields (elimInfo : ElimInfo) (altName : Name) : TermElabM Nat := do
for altInfo in elimInfo.altsInfo do
if altInfo.name == altName then
return altInfo.numFields
throwError "unknown alternative name '{altName}'"
private def checkAltNames (alts : Array (Name × MVarId)) (altsSyntax : Array Syntax) : TacticM Unit :=
for altStx in altsSyntax do
let altName := getAltName altStx
if altName != `_ then
unless alts.any fun (n, _) => n == altName do
throwErrorAt altStx "invalid alternative name '{altName}'"
def evalAlts (elimInfo : ElimInfo) (alts : Array (Name × MVarId)) (optPreTac : Syntax) (altsSyntax : Array Syntax)
(initialInfo : Info)
(numEqs : Nat := 0) (numGeneralized : Nat := 0) (toClear : Array FVarId := #[]) : TacticM Unit := do
checkAltNames alts altsSyntax
let hasAlts := altsSyntax.size > 0
if hasAlts then
-- default to initial state outside of alts
withInfoContext go initialInfo
else go
where
go := do
let hasAlts := altsSyntax.size > 0
let mut usedWildcard := false
let mut subgoals := #[] -- when alternatives are not provided, we accumulate subgoals here
let mut altsSyntax := altsSyntax
for (altName, altMVarId) in alts do
let numFields ← getAltNumFields elimInfo altName
let mut isWildcard := false
let altStx? ←
match altsSyntax.findIdx? (fun alt => getAltName alt == altName) with
| some idx =>
let altStx := altsSyntax[idx]
altsSyntax := altsSyntax.eraseIdx idx
pure (some altStx)
| none => match altsSyntax.findIdx? (fun alt => getAltName alt == `_) with
| some idx =>
isWildcard := true
pure (some altsSyntax[idx])
| none =>
pure none
match altStx? with
| none =>
let mut (_, altMVarId) ← introN altMVarId numFields
match (← Cases.unifyEqs numEqs altMVarId {}) with
| none => pure () -- alternative is not reachable
| some (altMVarId', _) =>
(_, altMVarId) ← introNP altMVarId' numGeneralized
for fvarId in toClear do
altMVarId ← tryClear altMVarId fvarId
let altMVarIds ← applyPreTac altMVarId
if !hasAlts then
-- User did not provide alternatives using `|`
subgoals := subgoals ++ altMVarIds.toArray
else if altMVarIds.isEmpty then
pure ()
else
logError m!"alternative '{altName}' has not been provided"
altMVarIds.forM fun mvarId => admitGoal mvarId
| some altStx =>
(subgoals, usedWildcard) ← withRef altStx do
let unusedAlt :=
if isWildcard then
pure (#[], usedWildcard)
else
throwError "alternative '{altName}' is not needed"
let altVarNames := getAltVarNames altStx
if altVarNames.size > numFields then
logError m!"too many variable names provided at alternative '{altName}', #{altVarNames.size} provided, but #{numFields} expected"
let mut (_, altMVarId) ← introN altMVarId numFields altVarNames.toList (useNamesForExplicitOnly := !altHasExplicitModifier altStx)
match (← Cases.unifyEqs numEqs altMVarId {}) with
| none => unusedAlt
| some (altMVarId', _) =>
(_, altMVarId) ← introNP altMVarId' numGeneralized
for fvarId in toClear do
altMVarId ← tryClear altMVarId fvarId
let altMVarIds ← applyPreTac altMVarId
if altMVarIds.isEmpty then
unusedAlt
else
let mut subgoals := subgoals
for altMVarId' in altMVarIds do
subgoals ← evalAlt altMVarId' altStx subgoals
pure (subgoals, usedWildcard || isWildcard)
if usedWildcard then
altsSyntax := altsSyntax.filter fun alt => getAltName alt != `_
unless altsSyntax.isEmpty do
logErrorAt altsSyntax[0] "unused alternative"
setGoals subgoals.toList
applyPreTac (mvarId : MVarId) : TacticM (List MVarId) :=
if optPreTac.isNone then
return [mvarId]
else
evalTacticAt optPreTac[0] mvarId
end ElimApp
/-
Recall that
```
generalizingVars := optional (" generalizing " >> many1 ident)
«induction» := leading_parser nonReservedSymbol "induction " >> majorPremise >> usingRec >> generalizingVars >> optional inductionAlts
```
`stx` is syntax for `induction`. -/
private def getUserGeneralizingFVarIds (stx : Syntax) : TacticM (Array FVarId) :=
withRef stx do
let generalizingStx := stx[3]
if generalizingStx.isNone then
pure #[]
else
trace[Elab.induction] "{generalizingStx}"
let vars := generalizingStx[1].getArgs
getFVarIds vars
-- process `generalizingVars` subterm of induction Syntax `stx`.
private def generalizeVars (mvarId : MVarId) (stx : Syntax) (targets : Array Expr) : TacticM (Nat × MVarId) :=
withMVarContext mvarId do
let userFVarIds ← getUserGeneralizingFVarIds stx
let forbidden ← mkGeneralizationForbiddenSet targets
let mut s ← getFVarSetToGeneralize targets forbidden
for userFVarId in userFVarIds do
if forbidden.contains userFVarId then
throwError "variable cannot be generalized because target depends on it{indentExpr (mkFVar userFVarId)}"
if s.contains userFVarId then
throwError "unnecessary 'generalizing' argument, variable '{mkFVar userFVarId}' is generalized automatically"
s := s.insert userFVarId
let fvarIds ← sortFVars s
let (fvarIds, mvarId') ← Meta.revert mvarId fvarIds
return (fvarIds.size, mvarId')
-- syntax inductionAlts := "with " (tactic)? withPosition( (colGe inductionAlt)+)
private def getAltsOfInductionAlts (inductionAlts : Syntax) : Array Syntax :=
inductionAlts[2].getArgs
private def getAltsOfOptInductionAlts (optInductionAlts : Syntax) : Array Syntax :=
if optInductionAlts.isNone then #[] else getAltsOfInductionAlts optInductionAlts[0]
private def getOptPreTacOfOptInductionAlts (optInductionAlts : Syntax) : Syntax :=
if optInductionAlts.isNone then mkNullNode else optInductionAlts[0][1]
/-
We may have at most one `| _ => ...` (wildcard alternative), and it must not set variable names.
The idea is to make sure users do not write unstructured tactics. -/
private def checkAltsOfOptInductionAlts (optInductionAlts : Syntax) : TacticM Unit :=
unless optInductionAlts.isNone do
let mut found := false
for alt in getAltsOfInductionAlts optInductionAlts[0] do
let n := getAltName alt
if n == `_ then
unless (getAltVarNames alt).isEmpty do
throwErrorAt alt "wildcard alternative must not specify variable names"
if found then
throwErrorAt alt "more than one wildcard alternative '| _ => ...' used"
found := true
def getInductiveValFromMajor (major : Expr) : TacticM InductiveVal :=
liftMetaMAtMain fun mvarId => do
let majorType ← inferType major
let majorType ← whnf majorType
matchConstInduct majorType.getAppFn
(fun _ => Meta.throwTacticEx `induction mvarId m!"major premise type is not an inductive type {indentExpr majorType}")
(fun val _ => pure val)
-- `optElimId` is of the form `("using" ident)?`
private def getElimNameInfo (optElimId : Syntax) (targets : Array Expr) (induction : Bool): TacticM (Name × ElimInfo) := do
if optElimId.isNone then
unless targets.size == 1 do
throwError "eliminator must be provided when multiple targets are used (use 'using <eliminator-name>')"
let indVal ← getInductiveValFromMajor targets[0]
let elimName := if induction then mkRecName indVal.name else mkCasesOnName indVal.name
pure (elimName, ← getElimInfo elimName)
else
let elimId := optElimId[1]
let elimName ← withRef elimId do resolveGlobalConstNoOverloadWithInfo elimId
pure (elimName, ← withRef elimId do getElimInfo elimName)
private def generalizeTargets (exprs : Array Expr) : TacticM (Array Expr) := do
if exprs.all (·.isFVar) then
return exprs
else
liftMetaTacticAux fun mvarId => do
let (fvarIds, mvarId) ← generalize mvarId (exprs.map fun expr => { expr })
return (fvarIds.map mkFVar, [mvarId])
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.induction] def evalInduction : Tactic := fun stx => focus do
let targets ← withMainContext <| stx[1].getSepArgs.mapM (elabTerm . none)
let targets ← generalizeTargets targets
let (elimName, elimInfo) ← getElimNameInfo stx[2] targets (induction := true)
let mvarId ← getMainGoal
-- save initial info before main goal is reassigned
let initInfo ← mkTacticInfo (← getMCtx) (← getUnsolvedGoals) (← getRef)
let tag ← getMVarTag mvarId
withMVarContext mvarId do
let targets ← addImplicitTargets elimInfo targets
checkTargets targets
let targetFVarIds := targets.map (·.fvarId!)
let (n, mvarId) ← generalizeVars mvarId stx targets
withMVarContext mvarId do
let result ← withRef stx[1] do -- use target position as reference
ElimApp.mkElimApp elimName elimInfo targets tag
let elimArgs := result.elimApp.getAppArgs
let motiveType ← inferType elimArgs[elimInfo.motivePos]
ElimApp.setMotiveArg mvarId elimArgs[elimInfo.motivePos].mvarId! targetFVarIds
let optInductionAlts := stx[4]
let optPreTac := getOptPreTacOfOptInductionAlts optInductionAlts
let alts := getAltsOfOptInductionAlts optInductionAlts
assignExprMVar mvarId result.elimApp
ElimApp.evalAlts elimInfo result.alts optPreTac alts initInfo (numGeneralized := n) (toClear := targetFVarIds)
appendGoals result.others.toList
where
checkTargets (targets : Array Expr) : MetaM Unit := do
let mut foundFVars : FVarIdSet := {}
for target in targets do
unless target.isFVar do
throwError "index in target's type is not a variable (consider using the `cases` tactic instead){indentExpr target}"
if foundFVars.contains target.fvarId! then
throwError "target (or one of its indices) occurs more than once{indentExpr target}"
def elabCasesTargets (targets : Array Syntax) : TacticM (Array Expr) :=
withMainContext do
let args ← targets.mapM fun target => do
let hName? := if target[0].isNone then none else some target[0][0].getId
let expr ← elabTerm target[1] none
return { expr, hName? : GeneralizeArg }
if args.all fun arg => arg.expr.isFVar && arg.hName?.isNone then
return args.map (·.expr)
else
liftMetaTacticAux fun mvarId => do
let (fvarIds, mvarId) ← generalize mvarId args
return (fvarIds[:targets.size].toArray.map mkFVar, [mvarId])
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Elab.cases
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.cases] def evalCases : Tactic := fun stx => focus do
-- leading_parser nonReservedSymbol "cases " >> sepBy1 (group majorPremise) ", " >> usingRec >> optInductionAlts
let targets ← elabCasesTargets stx[1].getSepArgs
let optInductionAlts := stx[3]
let optPreTac := getOptPreTacOfOptInductionAlts optInductionAlts
let alts := getAltsOfOptInductionAlts optInductionAlts
let targetRef := stx[1]
let (elimName, elimInfo) ← getElimNameInfo stx[2] targets (induction := false)
let mvarId ← getMainGoal
-- save initial info before main goal is reassigned
let initInfo ← mkTacticInfo (← getMCtx) (← getUnsolvedGoals) (← getRef)
let tag ← getMVarTag mvarId
withMVarContext mvarId do
let targets ← addImplicitTargets elimInfo targets
let result ← withRef targetRef <| ElimApp.mkElimApp elimName elimInfo targets tag
let elimArgs := result.elimApp.getAppArgs
let targets ← elimInfo.targetsPos.mapM fun i => instantiateMVars elimArgs[i]
let motiveType ← inferType elimArgs[elimInfo.motivePos]
let mvarId ← generalizeTargetsEq mvarId motiveType targets
let (targetsNew, mvarId) ← introN mvarId targets.size
withMVarContext mvarId do
ElimApp.setMotiveArg mvarId elimArgs[elimInfo.motivePos].mvarId! targetsNew
assignExprMVar mvarId result.elimApp
ElimApp.evalAlts elimInfo result.alts optPreTac alts initInfo (numEqs := targets.size) (toClear := targetsNew)
end Lean.Elab.Tactic
|
29c37861ae9177860047fab73a2f12761867735e | a047a4718edfa935d17231e9e6ecec8c7b701e05 | /src/data/nat/basic.lean | e4892e05a36919207b2215d242f9a4d7b0ec4420 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | utensil-contrib/mathlib | bae0c9fafe5e2bdb516efc89d6f8c1502ecc9767 | b91909e77e219098a2f8cc031f89d595fe274bd2 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,048,976,965 | 1,592,442,701,000 | 1,592,442,701,000 | 273,197,855 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,592,472,812,000 | 1,592,472,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 62,855 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.ordered_ring
import algebra.order_functions
import init_.data.nat.lemmas
/-!
# Basic operations on the natural numbers
This files has some basic lemmas about natural numbers, definition of the `choice` function,
and extra recursors:
* `le_rec_on`, `le_induction`: recursion and induction principles starting at non-zero numbers.
* `decreasing_induction` : recursion growing downwards.
* `strong_rec'` : recursion based on strong inequalities.
-/
universes u v
attribute [protected] nat.pow_zero nat.pow_succ
instance : canonically_ordered_comm_semiring ℕ :=
{ le_iff_exists_add := assume a b,
⟨assume h, let ⟨c, hc⟩ := nat.le.dest h in ⟨c, hc.symm⟩,
assume ⟨c, hc⟩, hc.symm ▸ nat.le_add_right _ _⟩,
zero_ne_one := ne_of_lt zero_lt_one,
mul_eq_zero_iff := assume a b,
iff.intro nat.eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero (by simp [or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt}),
bot := 0,
bot_le := nat.zero_le,
.. (infer_instance : ordered_add_comm_monoid ℕ),
.. (infer_instance : linear_ordered_semiring ℕ),
.. (infer_instance : comm_semiring ℕ) }
namespace nat
variables {m n k : ℕ}
-- Sometimes a bare `nat.add` or similar appears as a consequence of unfolding
-- during pattern matching. These lemmas package them back up as typeclass
-- mediated operations.
@[simp] theorem add_def {a b : ℕ} : nat.add a b = a + b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_def {a b : ℕ} : nat.mul a b = a * b := rfl
attribute [simp] nat.add_sub_cancel nat.add_sub_cancel_left
attribute [simp] nat.sub_self
@[simp] lemma succ_pos' {n : ℕ} : 0 < succ n := succ_pos n
theorem succ_inj' {n m : ℕ} : succ n = succ m ↔ n = m :=
⟨succ_inj, congr_arg _⟩
theorem succ_le_succ_iff {m n : ℕ} : succ m ≤ succ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨le_of_succ_le_succ, succ_le_succ⟩
lemma zero_max {m : nat} : max 0 m = m :=
max_eq_right (zero_le _)
theorem max_succ_succ {m n : ℕ} :
max (succ m) (succ n) = succ (max m n) :=
begin
by_cases h1 : m ≤ n,
rw [max_eq_right h1, max_eq_right (succ_le_succ h1)],
{ rw not_le at h1, have h2 := le_of_lt h1,
rw [max_eq_left h2, max_eq_left (succ_le_succ h2)] }
end
lemma not_succ_lt_self {n : ℕ} : ¬succ n < n :=
not_lt_of_ge (nat.le_succ _)
theorem lt_succ_iff {m n : ℕ} : m < succ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
succ_le_succ_iff
lemma succ_le_iff {m n : ℕ} : succ m ≤ n ↔ m < n :=
⟨lt_of_succ_le, succ_le_of_lt⟩
lemma lt_iff_add_one_le {m n : ℕ} : m < n ↔ m + 1 ≤ n :=
by rw succ_le_iff
-- Just a restatement of `nat.lt_succ_iff` using `+1`.
lemma lt_add_one_iff {a b : ℕ} : a < b + 1 ↔ a ≤ b :=
lt_succ_iff
-- A flipped version of `lt_add_one_iff`.
lemma lt_one_add_iff {a b : ℕ} : a < 1 + b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by simp only [add_comm, lt_succ_iff]
-- This is true reflexively, by the definition of `≤` on ℕ,
-- but it's still useful to have, to convince Lean to change the syntactic type.
lemma add_one_le_iff {a b : ℕ} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
iff.refl _
lemma one_add_le_iff {a b : ℕ} : 1 + a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
by simp only [add_comm, add_one_le_iff]
theorem of_le_succ {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m.succ) : n ≤ m ∨ n = m.succ :=
(lt_or_eq_of_le H).imp le_of_lt_succ id
/-- Recursion starting at a non-zero number: given a map `C k → C (k+1)` for each `k`,
there is a map from `C n` to each `C m`, `n ≤ m`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def le_rec_on {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n : ℕ} : Π {m : ℕ}, n ≤ m → (Π {k}, C k → C (k+1)) → C n → C m
| 0 H next x := eq.rec_on (eq_zero_of_le_zero H) x
| (m+1) H next x := or.by_cases (of_le_succ H) (λ h : n ≤ m, next $ le_rec_on h @next x) (λ h : n = m + 1, eq.rec_on h x)
theorem le_rec_on_self {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n} {h : n ≤ n} {next} (x : C n) : (le_rec_on h next x : C n) = x :=
by cases n; unfold le_rec_on or.by_cases; rw [dif_neg n.not_succ_le_self, dif_pos rfl]
theorem le_rec_on_succ {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (h1 : n ≤ m) {h2 : n ≤ m+1} {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h2 @next x : C (m+1)) = next (le_rec_on h1 @next x : C m) :=
by conv { to_lhs, rw [le_rec_on, or.by_cases, dif_pos h1] }
theorem le_rec_on_succ' {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n} {h : n ≤ n+1} {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h next x : C (n+1)) = next x :=
by rw [le_rec_on_succ (le_refl n), le_rec_on_self]
theorem le_rec_on_trans {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m k} (hnm : n ≤ m) (hmk : m ≤ k) {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on (le_trans hnm hmk) @next x : C k) = le_rec_on hmk @next (le_rec_on hnm @next x) :=
begin
induction hmk with k hmk ih, { rw le_rec_on_self },
rw [le_rec_on_succ (le_trans hnm hmk), ih, le_rec_on_succ]
end
theorem le_rec_on_succ_left {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (h1 : n ≤ m) (h2 : n+1 ≤ m)
{next : Π{{k}}, C k → C (k+1)} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h2 next (next x) : C m) = (le_rec_on h1 next x : C m) :=
begin
rw [subsingleton.elim h1 (le_trans (le_succ n) h2),
le_rec_on_trans (le_succ n) h2, le_rec_on_succ']
end
theorem le_rec_on_injective {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (hnm : n ≤ m)
(next : Π n, C n → C (n+1)) (Hnext : ∀ n, function.injective (next n)) :
function.injective (le_rec_on hnm next) :=
begin
induction hnm with m hnm ih, { intros x y H, rwa [le_rec_on_self, le_rec_on_self] at H },
intros x y H, rw [le_rec_on_succ hnm, le_rec_on_succ hnm] at H, exact ih (Hnext _ H)
end
theorem le_rec_on_surjective {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (hnm : n ≤ m)
(next : Π n, C n → C (n+1)) (Hnext : ∀ n, function.surjective (next n)) :
function.surjective (le_rec_on hnm next) :=
begin
induction hnm with m hnm ih, { intros x, use x, rw le_rec_on_self },
intros x, rcases Hnext _ x with ⟨w, rfl⟩, rcases ih w with ⟨x, rfl⟩, use x, rw le_rec_on_succ
end
theorem pred_eq_of_eq_succ {m n : ℕ} (H : m = n.succ) : m.pred = n := by simp [H]
@[simp] lemma pred_eq_succ_iff {n m : ℕ} : pred n = succ m ↔ n = m + 2 :=
by cases n; split; rintro ⟨⟩; refl
theorem pred_sub (n m : ℕ) : pred n - m = pred (n - m) :=
by rw [← sub_one, nat.sub_sub, one_add]; refl
@[simp]
lemma add_succ_sub_one (n m : ℕ) : (n + succ m) - 1 = n + m :=
by rw [add_succ, succ_sub_one]
@[simp]
lemma succ_add_sub_one (n m : ℕ) : (succ n + m) - 1 = n + m :=
by rw [succ_add, succ_sub_one]
lemma pred_eq_sub_one (n : ℕ) : pred n = n - 1 := rfl
lemma one_le_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : 1 ≤ m :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) h
lemma le_pred_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h : m < n) : m ≤ n - 1 :=
nat.sub_le_sub_right h 1
lemma le_of_pred_lt {m n : ℕ} : pred m < n → m ≤ n :=
match m with
| 0 := le_of_lt
| m+1 := id
end
/-- This ensures that `simp` succeeds on `pred (n + 1) = n`. -/
@[simp] lemma pred_one_add (n : ℕ) : pred (1 + n) = n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_one, pred_succ]
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero : 0 < n ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨ne_of_gt, nat.pos_of_ne_zero⟩
lemma one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 1 < n ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ n ≠ 1
| 0 := dec_trivial
| 1 := dec_trivial
| (n+2) := dec_trivial
theorem eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt {a b : ℕ} (h1 : a < b + 1) (h2 : ¬ a < b) : a = b :=
have h3 : a ≤ b, from le_of_lt_succ h1,
or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_not_lt h2) (λ h, h) (λ h, absurd h (not_lt_of_ge h3))
protected theorem le_sub_add (n m : ℕ) : n ≤ n - m + m :=
or.elim (le_total n m)
(assume : n ≤ m, begin rw [sub_eq_zero_of_le this, zero_add], exact this end)
(assume : m ≤ n, begin rw (nat.sub_add_cancel this) end)
theorem sub_add_eq_max (n m : ℕ) : n - m + m = max n m :=
eq_max (nat.le_sub_add _ _) (le_add_left _ _) $ λ k h₁ h₂,
by rw ← nat.sub_add_cancel h₂; exact
add_le_add_right (nat.sub_le_sub_right h₁ _) _
theorem add_sub_eq_max (n m : ℕ) : n + (m - n) = max n m :=
by rw [add_comm, max_comm, sub_add_eq_max]
theorem sub_add_min (n m : ℕ) : n - m + min n m = n :=
(le_total n m).elim
(λ h, by rw [min_eq_left h, sub_eq_zero_of_le h, zero_add])
(λ h, by rw [min_eq_right h, nat.sub_add_cancel h])
protected theorem add_sub_cancel' {n m : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : m + (n - m) = n :=
by rw [add_comm, nat.sub_add_cancel h]
protected theorem sub_eq_of_eq_add (h : k = m + n) : k - m = n :=
begin rw [h, nat.add_sub_cancel_left] end
theorem sub_cancel {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : a ≤ c) (w : b - a = c - a) : b = c :=
by rw [←nat.sub_add_cancel h₁, ←nat.sub_add_cancel h₂, w]
lemma sub_sub_sub_cancel_right {a b c : ℕ} (h₂ : c ≤ b) : (a - c) - (b - c) = a - b :=
by rw [nat.sub_sub, ←nat.add_sub_assoc h₂, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
lemma add_sub_cancel_right (n m k : ℕ) : n + (m + k) - k = n + m :=
by { rw [nat.add_sub_assoc, nat.add_sub_cancel], apply k.le_add_left }
protected lemma sub_add_eq_add_sub {a b c : ℕ} (h : b ≤ a) : (a - b) + c = (a + c) - b :=
by rw [add_comm a, nat.add_sub_assoc h, add_comm]
theorem sub_min (n m : ℕ) : n - min n m = n - m :=
nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add $ by rw [add_comm, sub_add_min]
theorem sub_sub_assoc {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : b ≤ a) (h₂ : c ≤ b) : a - (b - c) = a - b + c :=
(nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (le_trans (nat.sub_le _ _) h₁)).2 $
by rw [add_right_comm, add_assoc, nat.sub_add_cancel h₂, nat.sub_add_cancel h₁]
protected theorem lt_of_sub_pos (h : 0 < n - m) : m < n :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume : n ≤ m,
have n - m = 0, from sub_eq_zero_of_le this,
begin rw this at h, exact lt_irrefl _ h end)
protected theorem lt_of_sub_lt_sub_right : m - k < n - k → m < n :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h, nat.sub_le_sub_right h _)
protected theorem lt_of_sub_lt_sub_left : m - n < m - k → k < n :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (nat.sub_le_sub_left _)
protected theorem sub_lt_self (h₁ : 0 < m) (h₂ : 0 < n) : m - n < m :=
calc
m - n = succ (pred m) - succ (pred n) : by rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₁, succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₂]
... = pred m - pred n : by rw succ_sub_succ
... ≤ pred m : sub_le _ _
... < succ (pred m) : lt_succ_self _
... = m : succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₁
protected theorem le_sub_right_of_add_le (h : m + k ≤ n) : m ≤ n - k :=
by rw ← nat.add_sub_cancel m k; exact nat.sub_le_sub_right h k
protected theorem le_sub_left_of_add_le (h : k + m ≤ n) : m ≤ n - k :=
nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le (by rwa add_comm at h)
protected theorem lt_sub_right_of_add_lt (h : m + k < n) : m < n - k :=
lt_of_succ_le $ nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le $
by rw succ_add; exact succ_le_of_lt h
protected theorem lt_sub_left_of_add_lt (h : k + m < n) : m < n - k :=
nat.lt_sub_right_of_add_lt (by rwa add_comm at h)
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_right (h : m < n - k) : m + k < n :=
@nat.lt_of_sub_lt_sub_right _ _ k (by rwa nat.add_sub_cancel)
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_left (h : m < n - k) : k + m < n :=
by rw add_comm; exact nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right h
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_le_right : n - k ≤ m → n ≤ m + k :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.lt_sub_right_of_add_lt
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_le_left : n - k ≤ m → n ≤ k + m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.lt_sub_left_of_add_lt
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_lt_right : n - k < m → n < m + k :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_lt_left : n - k < m → n < k + m :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le nat.le_sub_left_of_add_le
protected theorem sub_le_left_of_le_add : n ≤ k + m → n - k ≤ m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left
protected theorem sub_le_right_of_le_add : n ≤ m + k → n - k ≤ m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right
protected theorem sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add (H : n ≤ k) : k - n < m ↔ k < n + m :=
⟨nat.lt_add_of_sub_lt_left,
λ h₁,
have succ k ≤ n + m, from succ_le_of_lt h₁,
have succ (k - n) ≤ m, from
calc succ (k - n) = succ k - n : by rw (succ_sub H)
... ≤ n + m - n : nat.sub_le_sub_right this n
... = m : by rw nat.add_sub_cancel_left,
lt_of_succ_le this⟩
protected theorem le_sub_left_iff_add_le (H : m ≤ k) : n ≤ k - m ↔ m + n ≤ k :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 (nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add H)
protected theorem le_sub_right_iff_add_le (H : n ≤ k) : m ≤ k - n ↔ m + n ≤ k :=
by rw [nat.le_sub_left_iff_add_le H, add_comm]
protected theorem lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt : n < k - m ↔ m + n < k :=
⟨nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left, nat.lt_sub_left_of_add_lt⟩
protected theorem lt_sub_right_iff_add_lt : m < k - n ↔ m + n < k :=
by rw [nat.lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt, add_comm]
theorem sub_le_left_iff_le_add : m - n ≤ k ↔ m ≤ n + k :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 nat.lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt
theorem sub_le_right_iff_le_add : m - k ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n + k :=
by rw [nat.sub_le_left_iff_le_add, add_comm]
protected theorem sub_lt_right_iff_lt_add (H : k ≤ m) : m - k < n ↔ m < n + k :=
by rw [nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add H, add_comm]
protected theorem sub_le_sub_left_iff (H : k ≤ m) : m - n ≤ m - k ↔ k ≤ n :=
⟨λ h,
have k + (m - k) - n ≤ m - k, by rwa nat.add_sub_cancel' H,
nat.le_of_add_le_add_right (nat.le_add_of_sub_le_left this),
nat.sub_le_sub_left _⟩
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_right_iff (H : k ≤ m) : m - k < n - k ↔ m < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (nat.sub_le_sub_right_iff _ _ _ H)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_left_iff (H : n ≤ m) : m - n < m - k ↔ k < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (nat.sub_le_sub_left_iff H)
protected theorem sub_le_iff : m - n ≤ k ↔ m - k ≤ n :=
nat.sub_le_left_iff_le_add.trans nat.sub_le_right_iff_le_add.symm
protected lemma sub_le_self (n m : ℕ) : n - m ≤ n :=
nat.sub_le_left_of_le_add (nat.le_add_left _ _)
protected theorem sub_lt_iff (h₁ : n ≤ m) (h₂ : k ≤ m) : m - n < k ↔ m - k < n :=
(nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add h₁).trans (nat.sub_lt_right_iff_lt_add h₂).symm
lemma pred_le_iff {n m : ℕ} : pred n ≤ m ↔ n ≤ succ m :=
@nat.sub_le_right_iff_le_add n m 1
lemma lt_pred_iff {n m : ℕ} : n < pred m ↔ succ n < m :=
@nat.lt_sub_right_iff_add_lt n 1 m
lemma lt_of_lt_pred {a b : ℕ} (h : a < b - 1) : a < b :=
lt_of_succ_lt (lt_pred_iff.1 h)
protected theorem mul_ne_zero {n m : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) (m0 : m ≠ 0) : n * m ≠ 0
| nm := (eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero nm).elim n0 m0
@[simp] protected theorem mul_eq_zero {a b : ℕ} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
iff.intro eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero (by simp [or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt})
@[simp] protected theorem zero_eq_mul {a b : ℕ} : 0 = a * b ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
by rw [eq_comm, nat.mul_eq_zero]
lemma eq_zero_of_double_le {a : ℕ} (h : 2 * a ≤ a) : a = 0 :=
nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero $
by rwa [two_mul, nat.add_le_to_le_sub, nat.sub_self] at h; refl
lemma eq_zero_of_mul_le {a b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (h : b * a ≤ a) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_double_le $ le_trans (nat.mul_le_mul_right _ hb) h
lemma le_mul_of_pos_left {m n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : m ≤ n * m :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← one_mul(m)]},
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (nat.succ_le_of_lt h) dec_trivial,
end
lemma le_mul_of_pos_right {m n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : m ≤ m * n :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← mul_one(m)]},
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (nat.succ_le_of_lt h) dec_trivial,
end
theorem two_mul_ne_two_mul_add_one {n m} : 2 * n ≠ 2 * m + 1 :=
mt (congr_arg (%2)) (by rw [add_comm, add_mul_mod_self_left, mul_mod_right]; exact dec_trivial)
/-- Recursion principle based on `<`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected def strong_rec' {p : ℕ → Sort u} (H : ∀ n, (∀ m, m < n → p m) → p n) : ∀ (n : ℕ), p n
| n := H n (λ m hm, strong_rec' m)
/-- Recursion principle based on `<` applied to some natural number. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def strong_rec_on' {P : ℕ → Sort*} (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ n, (∀ m, m < n → P m) → P n) : P n :=
nat.strong_rec' h n
theorem strong_rec_on_beta' {P : ℕ → Sort*} {h} {n : ℕ} :
(strong_rec_on' n h : P n) = h n (λ m hmn, (strong_rec_on' m h : P m)) :=
by { simp only [strong_rec_on'], rw nat.strong_rec' }
attribute [simp] nat.div_self
protected lemma div_le_of_le_mul' {m n : ℕ} {k} (h : m ≤ k * n) : m / k ≤ n :=
(eq_zero_or_pos k).elim
(λ k0, by rw [k0, nat.div_zero]; apply zero_le)
(λ k0, (decidable.mul_le_mul_left k0).1 $
calc k * (m / k)
≤ m % k + k * (m / k) : le_add_left _ _
... = m : mod_add_div _ _
... ≤ k * n : h)
protected lemma div_le_self' (m n : ℕ) : m / n ≤ m :=
(eq_zero_or_pos n).elim
(λ n0, by rw [n0, nat.div_zero]; apply zero_le)
(λ n0, nat.div_le_of_le_mul' $ calc
m = 1 * m : (one_mul _).symm
... ≤ n * m : mul_le_mul_right _ n0)
/-- A version of `nat.div_lt_self` using successors, rather than additional hypotheses. -/
lemma div_lt_self' (n b : ℕ) : (n+1)/(b+2) < n+1 :=
nat.div_lt_self (nat.succ_pos n) (nat.succ_lt_succ (nat.succ_pos _))
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le' {x y : ℕ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : 0 < k) : x ≤ y / k ↔ x * k ≤ y :=
begin
revert x, refine nat.strong_rec' _ y,
clear y, intros y IH x,
cases decidable.lt_or_le y k with h h,
{ rw [div_eq_of_lt h],
cases x with x,
{ simp [zero_mul, zero_le] },
{ rw succ_mul,
exact iff_of_false (not_succ_le_zero _)
(not_le_of_lt $ lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_add_left _ _)) } },
{ rw [div_eq_sub_div k0 h],
cases x with x,
{ simp [zero_mul, zero_le] },
{ rw [← add_one, nat.add_le_add_iff_le_right, succ_mul,
IH _ (sub_lt_of_pos_le _ _ k0 h), add_le_to_le_sub _ h] } }
end
theorem div_mul_le_self' (m n : ℕ) : m / n * n ≤ m :=
(nat.eq_zero_or_pos n).elim (λ n0, by simp [n0, zero_le]) $ λ n0,
(le_div_iff_mul_le' n0).1 (le_refl _)
theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul' {x y : ℕ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : 0 < k) : x / k < y ↔ x < y * k :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div_iff_mul_le' k0
protected theorem div_le_div_right {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) {k : ℕ} : n / k ≤ m / k :=
(nat.eq_zero_or_pos k).elim (λ k0, by simp [k0]) $ λ hk,
(le_div_iff_mul_le' hk).2 $ le_trans (nat.div_mul_le_self' _ _) h
lemma lt_of_div_lt_div {m n k : ℕ} (h : m / k < n / k) : m < n :=
by_contradiction $ λ h₁, absurd h (not_lt_of_ge (nat.div_le_div_right (not_lt.1 h₁)))
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : ℕ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = b * c :=
by rw [← H2, nat.mul_div_cancel' H1]
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : ℕ} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = b * c :=
⟨nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H⟩
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : ℕ} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = c * b :=
by rw mul_comm; exact nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_left {a b c : ℕ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = c * b :=
by rw [mul_comm, nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H1 H2]
protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left' {a b : ℕ} (Hd : a ∣ b) : a * (b / a) = b :=
by rw [mul_comm,nat.div_mul_cancel Hd]
protected theorem div_mod_unique {n k m d : ℕ} (h : 0 < k) :
n / k = d ∧ n % k = m ↔ m + k * d = n ∧ m < k :=
⟨λ ⟨e₁, e₂⟩, e₁ ▸ e₂ ▸ ⟨mod_add_div _ _, mod_lt _ h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁ ▸ by rw [add_mul_div_left _ _ h, add_mul_mod_self_left];
simp [div_eq_of_lt, mod_eq_of_lt, h₂]⟩
lemma two_mul_odd_div_two {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 2 = 1) : 2 * (n / 2) = n - 1 :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw [← nat.mod_add_div n 2, hn, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]}
lemma div_dvd_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (h : b ∣ a) : (a / b) ∣ a :=
⟨b, (nat.div_mul_cancel h).symm⟩
protected lemma div_pos {a b : ℕ} (hba : b ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a / b :=
nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, lt_irrefl a
(calc a = a % b : by simpa [h] using (mod_add_div a b).symm
... < b : nat.mod_lt a hb
... ≤ a : hba))
protected theorem mul_left_inj {a b c : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
⟨nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right ha, λ e, e ▸ rfl⟩
protected theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
⟨nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left ha, λ e, e ▸ rfl⟩
protected lemma div_div_self : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, b ∣ a → 0 < a → a / (a / b) = b
| a 0 h₁ h₂ := by rw eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁; refl
| 0 b h₁ h₂ := absurd h₂ dec_trivial
| (a+1) (b+1) h₁ h₂ :=
(nat.mul_left_inj (nat.div_pos (le_of_dvd (succ_pos a) h₁) (succ_pos b))).1 $
by rw [nat.div_mul_cancel (div_dvd_of_dvd h₁), nat.mul_div_cancel' h₁]
protected lemma div_lt_of_lt_mul {m n k : ℕ} (h : m < n * k) : m / n < k :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
(calc n * (m / n) ≤ m % n + n * (m / n) : nat.le_add_left _ _
... = m : mod_add_div _ _
... < n * k : h)
(nat.zero_le n)
lemma lt_mul_of_div_lt {a b c : ℕ} (h : a / c < b) (w : 0 < c) : a < b * c :=
lt_of_not_ge $ not_le_of_gt h ∘ (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ w).2
protected lemma div_eq_zero_iff {a b : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) : a / b = 0 ↔ a < b :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← mod_add_div a b, h, mul_zero, add_zero]; exact mod_lt _ hb,
λ h, by rw [← nat.mul_right_inj hb, ← @add_left_cancel_iff _ _ (a % b), mod_add_div,
mod_eq_of_lt h, mul_zero, add_zero]⟩
lemma eq_zero_of_le_div {a b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ a / b) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_mul_le hb $
by rw mul_comm; exact (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le' (lt_of_lt_of_le dec_trivial hb)).1 h
lemma mul_div_le_mul_div_assoc (a b c : ℕ) : a * (b / c) ≤ (a * b) / c :=
if hc0 : c = 0 then by simp [hc0]
else (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0)).2
(by rw [mul_assoc]; exact mul_le_mul_left _ (nat.div_mul_le_self _ _))
lemma div_mul_div_le_div (a b c : ℕ) : ((a / c) * b) / a ≤ b / c :=
if ha0 : a = 0 then by simp [ha0]
else calc a / c * b / a ≤ b * a / c / a :
nat.div_le_div_right (by rw [mul_comm];
exact mul_div_le_mul_div_assoc _ _ _)
... = b / c : by rw [nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, mul_comm b, mul_comm c,
nat.mul_div_mul _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero ha0)]
lemma eq_zero_of_le_half {a : ℕ} (h : a ≤ a / 2) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_le_div (le_refl _) h
lemma mod_mul_right_div_self (a b c : ℕ) : a % (b * c) / b = (a / b) % c :=
if hb : b = 0 then by simp [hb] else if hc : c = 0 then by simp [hc]
else by conv {to_rhs, rw ← mod_add_div a (b * c)};
rw [mul_assoc, nat.add_mul_div_left _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb), add_mul_mod_self_left,
mod_eq_of_lt (nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul (mod_lt _ (mul_pos (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb) (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc))))]
lemma mod_mul_left_div_self (a b c : ℕ) : a % (c * b) / b = (a / b) % c :=
by rw [mul_comm c, mod_mul_right_div_self]
/- The `n+1`-st triangle number is `n` more than the `n`-th triangle number -/
lemma triangle_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1) * ((n + 1) - 1) / 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 + n :=
begin
rw [← add_mul_div_left, mul_comm 2 n, ← mul_add, nat.add_sub_cancel, mul_comm],
cases n; refl, apply zero_lt_succ
end
@[simp] protected theorem dvd_one {n : ℕ} : n ∣ 1 ↔ n = 1 :=
⟨eq_one_of_dvd_one, λ e, e.symm ▸ dvd_refl _⟩
protected theorem dvd_add_left {k m n : ℕ} (h : k ∣ n) : k ∣ m + n ↔ k ∣ m :=
(nat.dvd_add_iff_left h).symm
protected theorem dvd_add_right {k m n : ℕ} (h : k ∣ m) : k ∣ m + n ↔ k ∣ n :=
(nat.dvd_add_iff_right h).symm
/-- A natural number m divides the sum m + n if and only if m divides b.-/
@[simp] protected lemma dvd_add_self_left {m n : ℕ} :
m ∣ m + n ↔ m ∣ n :=
nat.dvd_add_right (dvd_refl m)
/-- A natural number m divides the sum n + m if and only if m divides b.-/
@[simp] protected lemma dvd_add_self_right {m n : ℕ} :
m ∣ n + m ↔ m ∣ n :=
nat.dvd_add_left (dvd_refl m)
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_left {a b c : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : a * b ∣ a * c ↔ b ∣ c :=
exists_congr $ λ d, by rw [mul_assoc, nat.mul_right_inj ha]
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_right {a b c : ℕ} (hc : 0 < c) : a * c ∣ b * c ↔ a ∣ b :=
exists_congr $ λ d, by rw [mul_right_comm, nat.mul_left_inj hc]
lemma succ_div : ∀ (a b : ℕ), (a + 1) / b =
a / b + if b ∣ a + 1 then 1 else 0
| a 0 := by simp
| 0 1 := rfl
| 0 (b+2) := have hb2 : b + 2 > 1, from dec_trivial,
by simp [ne_of_gt hb2, div_eq_of_lt hb2]
| (a+1) (b+1) := begin
rw [nat.div_def], conv_rhs { rw nat.div_def },
by_cases hb_eq_a : b = a + 1,
{ simp [hb_eq_a, le_refl] },
by_cases hb_le_a1 : b ≤ a + 1,
{ have hb_le_a : b ≤ a, from le_of_lt_succ (lt_of_le_of_ne hb_le_a1 hb_eq_a),
have h₁ : (0 < b + 1 ∧ b + 1 ≤ a + 1 + 1),
from ⟨succ_pos _, (add_le_add_iff_right _).2 hb_le_a1⟩,
have h₂ : (0 < b + 1 ∧ b + 1 ≤ a + 1),
from ⟨succ_pos _, (add_le_add_iff_right _).2 hb_le_a⟩,
have dvd_iff : b + 1 ∣ a - b + 1 ↔ b + 1 ∣ a + 1 + 1,
{ rw [nat.dvd_add_iff_left (dvd_refl (b + 1)),
← nat.add_sub_add_right a 1 b, add_comm (_ - _), add_assoc,
nat.sub_add_cancel (succ_le_succ hb_le_a), add_comm 1] },
have wf : a - b < a + 1, from lt_succ_of_le (nat.sub_le_self _ _),
rw [if_pos h₁, if_pos h₂, nat.add_sub_add_right, nat.sub_add_comm hb_le_a,
by exact have _ := wf, succ_div (a - b),
nat.add_sub_add_right],
simp [dvd_iff, succ_eq_add_one, add_comm 1, add_assoc] },
{ have hba : ¬ b ≤ a,
from not_le_of_gt (lt_trans (lt_succ_self a) (lt_of_not_ge hb_le_a1)),
have hb_dvd_a : ¬ b + 1 ∣ a + 2,
from λ h, hb_le_a1 (le_of_succ_le_succ (le_of_dvd (succ_pos _) h)),
simp [hba, hb_le_a1, hb_dvd_a], }
end
lemma succ_div_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hba : b ∣ a + 1) :
(a + 1) / b = a / b + 1 :=
by rw [succ_div, if_pos hba]
lemma succ_div_of_not_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hba : ¬ b ∣ a + 1) :
(a + 1) / b = a / b :=
by rw [succ_div, if_neg hba, add_zero]
@[simp] theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (n : nat) {m k : nat} (h : m ∣ k) : n % k % m = n % m :=
begin
conv { to_rhs, rw ←mod_add_div n k },
rcases h with ⟨t, rfl⟩, rw [mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
end
@[simp] theorem mod_mod (a n : ℕ) : (a % n) % n = a % n :=
(eq_zero_or_pos n).elim
(λ n0, by simp [n0])
(λ npos, mod_eq_of_lt (mod_lt _ npos))
/-- If `a` and `b` are equal mod `c`, `a - b` is zero mod `c`. -/
lemma sub_mod_eq_zero_of_mod_eq {a b c : ℕ} (h : a % c = b % c) : (a - b) % c = 0 :=
by rw [←nat.mod_add_div a c, ←nat.mod_add_div b c, ←h, ←nat.sub_sub, nat.add_sub_cancel_left,
←nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, nat.mul_mod_right]
lemma dvd_sub_mod (k : ℕ) : n ∣ (k - (k % n)) :=
⟨k / n, nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add (nat.mod_add_div k n).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem mod_add_mod (m n k : ℕ) : (m % n + k) % n = (m + k) % n :=
by have := (add_mul_mod_self_left (m % n + k) n (m / n)).symm;
rwa [add_right_comm, mod_add_div] at this
@[simp] theorem add_mod_mod (m n k : ℕ) : (m + n % k) % k = (m + n) % k :=
by rw [add_comm, mod_add_mod, add_comm]
lemma add_mod (a b n : ℕ) : (a + b) % n = ((a % n) + (b % n)) % n :=
by rw [add_mod_mod, mod_add_mod]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_right {m n k : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(m + i) % n = (k + i) % n :=
by rw [← mod_add_mod, ← mod_add_mod k, H]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_left {m n k : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(i + m) % n = (i + k) % n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_mod_eq_add_mod_right _ H, add_comm]
lemma mul_mod (a b n : ℕ) : (a * b) % n = ((a % n) * (b % n)) % n :=
begin
conv_lhs {
rw [←mod_add_div a n, ←mod_add_div b n, right_distrib, left_distrib, left_distrib,
mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ←left_distrib n _ _, add_mul_mod_self_left,
mul_comm _ (n * (b / n)), mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left] }
end
theorem add_pos_left {m : ℕ} (h : 0 < m) (n : ℕ) : 0 < m + n :=
calc
m + n > 0 + n : nat.add_lt_add_right h n
... = n : nat.zero_add n
... ≥ 0 : zero_le n
theorem add_pos_right (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : 0 < m + n :=
begin rw add_comm, exact add_pos_left h m end
theorem add_pos_iff_pos_or_pos (m n : ℕ) : 0 < m + n ↔ 0 < m ∨ 0 < n :=
iff.intro
begin
intro h,
cases m with m,
{simp [zero_add] at h, exact or.inr h},
exact or.inl (succ_pos _)
end
begin
intro h, cases h with mpos npos,
{ apply add_pos_left mpos },
apply add_pos_right _ npos
end
lemma add_eq_one_iff : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, a + b = 1 ↔ (a = 0 ∧ b = 1) ∨ (a = 1 ∧ b = 0)
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 1 := dec_trivial
| 1 0 := dec_trivial
| 1 1 := dec_trivial
| (a+2) _ := by rw add_right_comm; exact dec_trivial
| _ (b+2) := by rw [← add_assoc]; simp only [nat.succ_inj', nat.succ_ne_zero]; simp
lemma mul_eq_one_iff : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, a * b = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∧ b = 1
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 1 := dec_trivial
| 1 0 := dec_trivial
| (a+2) 0 := by simp
| 0 (b+2) := by simp
| (a+1) (b+1) := ⟨λ h, by simp only [add_mul, mul_add, mul_add, one_mul, mul_one,
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm, nat.succ_inj', add_eq_zero_iff] at h; simp [h.1.2, h.2],
by clear_aux_decl; finish⟩
lemma mul_right_eq_self_iff {a b : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 :=
suffices a * b = a * 1 ↔ b = 1, by rwa mul_one at this,
nat.mul_right_inj ha
lemma mul_left_eq_self_iff {a b : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 :=
by rw [mul_comm, nat.mul_right_eq_self_iff hb]
lemma lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq {n i : ℕ} : n < i.succ ↔ (n < i ∨ n = i) :=
lt_succ_iff.trans le_iff_lt_or_eq
theorem le_zero_iff {i : ℕ} : i ≤ 0 ↔ i = 0 :=
⟨nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero, assume h, h ▸ le_refl i⟩
theorem le_add_one_iff {i j : ℕ} : i ≤ j + 1 ↔ (i ≤ j ∨ i = j + 1) :=
⟨assume h,
match nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h with
| or.inl h := or.inr h
| or.inr h := or.inl $ nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h
end,
or.rec (assume h, le_trans h $ nat.le_add_right _ _) le_of_eq⟩
theorem mul_self_inj {n m : ℕ} : n * n = m * m ↔ n = m :=
le_antisymm_iff.trans (le_antisymm_iff.trans
(and_congr mul_self_le_mul_self_iff mul_self_le_mul_self_iff)).symm
section facts
-- Inject some simple facts into the typeclass system.
-- This `fact` should not be confused with the factorial function `nat.fact`!
instance succ_pos'' (n : ℕ) : _root_.fact (0 < n.succ) := n.succ_pos
instance pos_of_one_lt (n : ℕ) [h : fact (1 < n)] : fact (0 < n) :=
lt_trans zero_lt_one h
end facts
instance decidable_ball_lt (n : nat) (P : Π k < n, Prop) :
∀ [H : ∀ n h, decidable (P n h)], decidable (∀ n h, P n h) :=
begin
induction n with n IH; intro; resetI,
{ exact is_true (λ n, dec_trivial) },
cases IH (λ k h, P k (lt_succ_of_lt h)) with h,
{ refine is_false (mt _ h), intros hn k h, apply hn },
by_cases p : P n (lt_succ_self n),
{ exact is_true (λ k h',
(lt_or_eq_of_le $ le_of_lt_succ h').elim (h _)
(λ e, match k, e, h' with _, rfl, h := p end)) },
{ exact is_false (mt (λ hn, hn _ _) p) }
end
instance decidable_forall_fin {n : ℕ} (P : fin n → Prop)
[H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀ i, P i) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ k h, P ⟨k, h⟩) ⟨λ a ⟨k, h⟩, a k h, λ a k h, a ⟨k, h⟩⟩
instance decidable_ball_le (n : ℕ) (P : Π k ≤ n, Prop)
[H : ∀ n h, decidable (P n h)] : decidable (∀ n h, P n h) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ k (h : k < succ n), P k (le_of_lt_succ h))
⟨λ a k h, a k (lt_succ_of_le h), λ a k h, a k _⟩
instance decidable_lo_hi (lo hi : ℕ) (P : ℕ → Prop) [H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀x, lo ≤ x → x < hi → P x) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ x < hi - lo, P (lo + x))
⟨λal x hl hh, by have := al (x - lo) (lt_of_not_ge $
(not_congr (nat.sub_le_sub_right_iff _ _ _ hl)).2 $ not_le_of_gt hh);
rwa [nat.add_sub_of_le hl] at this,
λal x h, al _ (nat.le_add_right _ _) (nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left h)⟩
instance decidable_lo_hi_le (lo hi : ℕ) (P : ℕ → Prop) [H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀x, lo ≤ x → x ≤ hi → P x) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀x, lo ≤ x → x < hi + 1 → P x) $
ball_congr $ λ x hl, imp_congr lt_succ_iff iff.rfl
protected theorem bit0_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : bit0 n ≤ bit0 m :=
add_le_add h h
protected theorem bit1_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : bit1 n ≤ bit1 m :=
succ_le_succ (add_le_add h h)
theorem bit_le : ∀ (b : bool) {n m : ℕ}, n ≤ m → bit b n ≤ bit b m
| tt n m h := nat.bit1_le h
| ff n m h := nat.bit0_le h
theorem bit_ne_zero (b) {n} (h : n ≠ 0) : bit b n ≠ 0 :=
by cases b; [exact nat.bit0_ne_zero h, exact nat.bit1_ne_zero _]
theorem bit0_le_bit : ∀ (b) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → bit0 m ≤ bit b n
| tt m n h := le_of_lt $ nat.bit0_lt_bit1 h
| ff m n h := nat.bit0_le h
theorem bit_le_bit1 : ∀ (b) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → bit b m ≤ bit1 n
| ff m n h := le_of_lt $ nat.bit0_lt_bit1 h
| tt m n h := nat.bit1_le h
theorem bit_lt_bit0 : ∀ (b) {n m : ℕ}, n < m → bit b n < bit0 m
| tt n m h := nat.bit1_lt_bit0 h
| ff n m h := nat.bit0_lt h
theorem bit_lt_bit (a b) {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : bit a n < bit b m :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (bit_lt_bit0 _ h) (bit0_le_bit _ (le_refl _))
@[simp] lemma bit0_le_bit1_iff : bit0 k ≤ bit1 n ↔ k ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by rwa [← nat.lt_succ_iff, n.bit1_eq_succ_bit0, ← n.bit0_succ_eq,
bit0_lt_bit0, nat.lt_succ_iff] at h, λ h, le_of_lt (nat.bit0_lt_bit1 h)⟩
@[simp] lemma bit0_lt_bit1_iff : bit0 k < bit1 n ↔ k ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, bit0_le_bit1_iff.1 (le_of_lt h), nat.bit0_lt_bit1⟩
@[simp] lemma bit1_le_bit0_iff : bit1 k ≤ bit0 n ↔ k < n :=
⟨λ h, by rwa [k.bit1_eq_succ_bit0, succ_le_iff, bit0_lt_bit0] at h,
λ h, le_of_lt (nat.bit1_lt_bit0 h)⟩
@[simp] lemma bit1_lt_bit0_iff : bit1 k < bit0 n ↔ k < n :=
⟨λ h, bit1_le_bit0_iff.1 (le_of_lt h), nat.bit1_lt_bit0⟩
@[simp] lemma one_le_bit0_iff : 1 ≤ bit0 n ↔ 0 < n :=
by { convert bit1_le_bit0_iff, refl, }
@[simp] lemma one_lt_bit0_iff : 1 < bit0 n ↔ 1 ≤ n :=
by { convert bit1_lt_bit0_iff, refl, }
@[simp] lemma bit_le_bit_iff : ∀ {b : bool}, bit b k ≤ bit b n ↔ k ≤ n
| ff := bit0_le_bit0
| tt := bit1_le_bit1
@[simp] lemma bit_lt_bit_iff : ∀ {b : bool}, bit b k < bit b n ↔ k < n
| ff := bit0_lt_bit0
| tt := bit1_lt_bit1
@[simp] lemma bit_le_bit1_iff : ∀ {b : bool}, bit b k ≤ bit1 n ↔ k ≤ n
| ff := bit0_le_bit1_iff
| tt := bit1_le_bit1
lemma pos_of_bit0_pos {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < bit0 n) : 0 < n :=
by { cases n, cases h, apply succ_pos, }
/-- Define a function on `ℕ` depending on parity of the argument. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def bit_cases {C : ℕ → Sort u} (H : Π b n, C (bit b n)) (n : ℕ) : C n :=
eq.rec_on n.bit_decomp (H (bodd n) (div2 n))
/- partial subtraction -/
/-- Partial predecessor operation. Returns `ppred n = some m`
if `n = m + 1`, otherwise `none`. -/
@[simp] def ppred : ℕ → option ℕ
| 0 := none
| (n+1) := some n
/-- Partial subtraction operation. Returns `psub m n = some k`
if `m = n + k`, otherwise `none`. -/
@[simp] def psub (m : ℕ) : ℕ → option ℕ
| 0 := some m
| (n+1) := psub n >>= ppred
theorem pred_eq_ppred (n : ℕ) : pred n = (ppred n).get_or_else 0 :=
by cases n; refl
theorem sub_eq_psub (m : ℕ) : ∀ n, m - n = (psub m n).get_or_else 0
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := (pred_eq_ppred (m-n)).trans $
by rw [sub_eq_psub, psub]; cases psub m n; refl
@[simp] theorem ppred_eq_some {m : ℕ} : ∀ {n}, ppred n = some m ↔ succ m = n
| 0 := by split; intro h; contradiction
| (n+1) := by dsimp; split; intro h; injection h; subst n
@[simp] theorem ppred_eq_none : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ppred n = none ↔ n = 0
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := by dsimp; split; contradiction
theorem psub_eq_some {m : ℕ} : ∀ {n k}, psub m n = some k ↔ k + n = m
| 0 k := by simp [eq_comm]
| (n+1) k :=
begin
dsimp,
apply option.bind_eq_some.trans,
simp [psub_eq_some, add_comm, add_left_comm, nat.succ_eq_add_one]
end
theorem psub_eq_none (m n : ℕ) : psub m n = none ↔ m < n :=
begin
cases s : psub m n; simp [eq_comm],
{ show m < n, refine lt_of_not_ge (λ h, _),
cases le.dest h with k e,
injection s.symm.trans (psub_eq_some.2 $ (add_comm _ _).trans e) },
{ show n ≤ m, rw ← psub_eq_some.1 s, apply le_add_left }
end
theorem ppred_eq_pred {n} (h : 0 < n) : ppred n = some (pred n) :=
ppred_eq_some.2 $ succ_pred_eq_of_pos h
theorem psub_eq_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : psub m n = some (m - n) :=
psub_eq_some.2 $ nat.sub_add_cancel h
theorem psub_add (m n k) : psub m (n + k) = do x ← psub m n, psub x k :=
by induction k; simp [*, add_succ, bind_assoc]
/- pow -/
attribute [simp] nat.pow_zero nat.pow_one
@[simp] lemma one_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, 1 ^ n = 1
| 0 := rfl
| (k+1) := show 1^k * 1 = 1, by rw [mul_one, one_pow]
theorem pow_add (a m n : ℕ) : a^(m + n) = a^m * a^n :=
by induction n; simp [*, nat.pow_succ, mul_assoc]
theorem pow_two (a : ℕ) : a ^ 2 = a * a := show (1 * a) * a = _, by rw one_mul
theorem pow_dvd_pow (a : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : a^m ∣ a^n :=
by rw [← nat.add_sub_cancel' h, pow_add]; apply dvd_mul_right
theorem pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (h : a ∣ b) : ∀ n:ℕ, a^n ∣ b^n
| 0 := dvd_refl _
| (n+1) := mul_dvd_mul (pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd n) h
theorem mul_pow (a b n : ℕ) : (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [*, nat.pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
protected theorem pow_mul (a b n : ℕ) : n ^ (a * b) = (n ^ a) ^ b :=
by induction b; simp [*, nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.pow_add, mul_add, mul_comm]
theorem pow_pos {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < p ^ n
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := mul_pos (pow_pos _) hp
lemma pow_eq_mul_pow_sub (p : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : p ^ m * p ^ (n - m) = p ^ n :=
by rw [←nat.pow_add, nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
lemma pow_lt_pow_succ {p : ℕ} (h : 1 < p) (n : ℕ) : p^n < p^(n+1) :=
suffices p^n*1 < p^n*p, by simpa,
nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (nat.pow_pos (lt_of_succ_lt h) n)
lemma lt_pow_self {p : ℕ} (h : 1 < p) : ∀ n : ℕ, n < p ^ n
| 0 := by simp [zero_lt_one]
| (n+1) := calc
n + 1 < p^n + 1 : nat.add_lt_add_right (lt_pow_self _) _
... ≤ p ^ (n+1) : pow_lt_pow_succ h _
lemma lt_two_pow (n : ℕ) : n < 2^n :=
lt_pow_self dec_trivial n
lemma one_le_pow (n m : ℕ) (h : 0 < m) : 1 ≤ m^n :=
one_pow n ▸ pow_le_pow_of_le_left h n
lemma one_le_pow' (n m : ℕ) : 1 ≤ (m+1)^n := one_le_pow n (m+1) (succ_pos m)
lemma one_le_two_pow (n : ℕ) : 1 ≤ 2^n := one_le_pow n 2 dec_trivial
lemma one_lt_pow (n m : ℕ) (h₀ : 0 < n) (h₁ : 1 < m) : 1 < m^n :=
one_pow n ▸ pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left h₁ h₀
lemma one_lt_pow' (n m : ℕ) : 1 < (m+2)^(n+1) :=
one_lt_pow (n+1) (m+2) (succ_pos n) (nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl)
lemma one_lt_two_pow (n : ℕ) (h₀ : 0 < n) : 1 < 2^n := one_lt_pow n 2 h₀ dec_trivial
lemma one_lt_two_pow' (n : ℕ) : 1 < 2^(n+1) := one_lt_pow (n+1) 2 (succ_pos n) dec_trivial
lemma pow_right_strict_mono {x : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : strict_mono (nat.pow x) :=
λ _ _, pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right k
lemma pow_le_iff_le_right {x m n : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : x^m ≤ x^n ↔ m ≤ n :=
strict_mono.le_iff_le (pow_right_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_lt_iff_lt_right {x m n : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : x^m < x^n ↔ m < n :=
strict_mono.lt_iff_lt (pow_right_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_right_injective {x : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : function.injective (nat.pow x) :=
strict_mono.injective (pow_right_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_dvd_pow_iff_pow_le_pow {k l : ℕ} : Π {x : ℕ} (w : 0 < x), x^k ∣ x^l ↔ x^k ≤ x^l
| (x+1) w :=
begin
split,
{ intro a, exact le_of_dvd (pow_pos (succ_pos x) l) a, },
{ intro a, cases x with x,
{ simp only [one_pow], },
{ have le := (pow_le_iff_le_right (le_add_left _ _)).mp a,
use (x+2)^(l-k),
rw [←nat.pow_add, add_comm k, nat.sub_add_cancel le], } }
end
/-- If `1 < x`, then `x^k` divides `x^l` if and only if `k` is at most `l`. -/
lemma pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right {x k l : ℕ} (w : 1 < x) : x^k ∣ x^l ↔ k ≤ l :=
by rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_pow_le_pow (lt_of_succ_lt w), pow_le_iff_le_right w]
lemma pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right' {b k l : ℕ} : (b+2)^k ∣ (b+2)^l ↔ k ≤ l :=
pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right (nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl)
lemma pow_left_strict_mono {m : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : strict_mono (λ (x : ℕ), x^m) :=
λ _ _ h, pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left h k
lemma pow_le_iff_le_left {m x y : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : x^m ≤ y^m ↔ x ≤ y :=
strict_mono.le_iff_le (pow_left_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_lt_iff_lt_left {m x y : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : x^m < y^m ↔ x < y :=
strict_mono.lt_iff_lt (pow_left_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_left_injective {m : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : function.injective (λ (x : ℕ), x^m) :=
strict_mono.injective (pow_left_strict_mono k)
lemma not_pos_pow_dvd : ∀ {p k : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) (hk : 1 < k), ¬ p^k ∣ p
| (succ p) (succ k) hp hk h :=
have (succ p)^k * succ p ∣ 1 * succ p, by simpa,
have (succ p) ^ k ∣ 1, from dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (succ_pos _) this,
have he : (succ p) ^ k = 1, from eq_one_of_dvd_one this,
have k < (succ p) ^ k, from lt_pow_self hp k,
have k < 1, by rwa [he] at this,
have k = 0, from eq_zero_of_le_zero $ le_of_lt_succ this,
have 1 < 1, by rwa [this] at hk,
absurd this dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bodd_div2_eq (n : ℕ) : bodd_div2 n = (bodd n, div2 n) :=
by unfold bodd div2; cases bodd_div2 n; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit0 (n) : bodd (bit0 n) = ff := bodd_bit ff n
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit1 (n) : bodd (bit1 n) = tt := bodd_bit tt n
@[simp] lemma div2_bit0 (n) : div2 (bit0 n) = n := div2_bit ff n
@[simp] lemma div2_bit1 (n) : div2 (bit1 n) = n := div2_bit tt n
/- size and shift -/
theorem shiftl'_ne_zero_left (b) {m} (h : m ≠ 0) (n) : shiftl' b m n ≠ 0 :=
by induction n; simp [shiftl', bit_ne_zero, *]
theorem shiftl'_tt_ne_zero (m) : ∀ {n} (h : n ≠ 0), shiftl' tt m n ≠ 0
| 0 h := absurd rfl h
| (succ n) _ := nat.bit1_ne_zero _
@[simp] theorem size_zero : size 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem size_bit {b n} (h : bit b n ≠ 0) : size (bit b n) = succ (size n) :=
begin
rw size,
conv { to_lhs, rw [binary_rec], simp [h] },
rw div2_bit,
end
@[simp] theorem size_bit0 {n} (h : n ≠ 0) : size (bit0 n) = succ (size n) :=
@size_bit ff n (nat.bit0_ne_zero h)
@[simp] theorem size_bit1 (n) : size (bit1 n) = succ (size n) :=
@size_bit tt n (nat.bit1_ne_zero n)
@[simp] theorem size_one : size 1 = 1 := by apply size_bit1 0
@[simp] theorem size_shiftl' {b m n} (h : shiftl' b m n ≠ 0) :
size (shiftl' b m n) = size m + n :=
begin
induction n with n IH; simp [shiftl'] at h ⊢,
rw [size_bit h, nat.add_succ],
by_cases s0 : shiftl' b m n = 0; [skip, rw [IH s0]],
rw s0 at h ⊢,
cases b, {exact absurd rfl h},
have : shiftl' tt m n + 1 = 1 := congr_arg (+1) s0,
rw [shiftl'_tt_eq_mul_pow] at this,
have m0 := succ_inj (eq_one_of_dvd_one ⟨_, this.symm⟩),
subst m0,
simp at this,
have : n = 0 := eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_not_gt $ λ hn,
ne_of_gt (pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right dec_trivial hn) this),
subst n, refl
end
@[simp] theorem size_shiftl {m} (h : m ≠ 0) (n) :
size (shiftl m n) = size m + n :=
size_shiftl' (shiftl'_ne_zero_left _ h _)
theorem lt_size_self (n : ℕ) : n < 2^size n :=
begin
rw [← one_shiftl],
have : ∀ {n}, n = 0 → n < shiftl 1 (size n) :=
λ n e, by subst e; exact dec_trivial,
apply binary_rec _ _ n, {apply this rfl},
intros b n IH,
by_cases bit b n = 0, {apply this h},
rw [size_bit h, shiftl_succ],
exact bit_lt_bit0 _ IH
end
theorem size_le {m n : ℕ} : size m ≤ n ↔ m < 2^n :=
⟨λ h, lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_size_self _) (pow_le_pow_of_le_right dec_trivial h),
begin
rw [← one_shiftl], revert n,
apply binary_rec _ _ m,
{ intros n h, apply zero_le },
{ intros b m IH n h,
by_cases e : bit b m = 0, { rw e, apply zero_le },
rw [size_bit e],
cases n with n,
{ exact e.elim (eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_lt_succ h)) },
{ apply succ_le_succ (IH _),
apply lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h', bit0_le_bit _ h') h } }
end⟩
theorem lt_size {m n : ℕ} : m < size n ↔ 2^m ≤ n :=
by rw [← not_lt, iff_not_comm, not_lt, size_le]
theorem size_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < size n ↔ 0 < n :=
by rw lt_size; refl
theorem size_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : size n = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
by have := @size_pos n; simp [pos_iff_ne_zero] at this;
exact not_iff_not.1 this
theorem size_pow {n : ℕ} : size (2^n) = n+1 :=
le_antisymm
(size_le.2 $ pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right dec_trivial (lt_succ_self _))
(lt_size.2 $ le_refl _)
theorem size_le_size {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : size m ≤ size n :=
size_le.2 $ lt_of_le_of_lt h (lt_size_self _)
/- factorial -/
/-- `fact n` is the factorial of `n`. -/
@[simp] def fact : nat → nat
| 0 := 1
| (succ n) := succ n * fact n
@[simp] theorem fact_zero : fact 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fact_succ (n) : fact (succ n) = succ n * fact n := rfl
@[simp] theorem fact_one : fact 1 = 1 := rfl
theorem fact_pos : ∀ n, 0 < fact n
| 0 := zero_lt_one
| (succ n) := mul_pos (succ_pos _) (fact_pos n)
theorem fact_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : fact n ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (fact_pos _)
theorem fact_dvd_fact {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : fact m ∣ fact n :=
begin
induction n with n IH; simp,
{ have := eq_zero_of_le_zero h, subst m, simp },
{ cases eq_or_lt_of_le h with he hl,
{ subst m, simp },
{ apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (IH (le_of_lt_succ hl)) } }
end
theorem dvd_fact : ∀ {m n}, 0 < m → m ≤ n → m ∣ fact n
| (succ m) n _ h := dvd_of_mul_right_dvd (fact_dvd_fact h)
theorem fact_le {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : fact m ≤ fact n :=
le_of_dvd (fact_pos _) (fact_dvd_fact h)
lemma fact_mul_pow_le_fact : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m.fact * m.succ ^ n ≤ (m + n).fact
| m 0 := by simp
| m (n+1) :=
by rw [← add_assoc, nat.fact_succ, mul_comm (nat.succ _), nat.pow_succ, ← mul_assoc];
exact mul_le_mul fact_mul_pow_le_fact
(nat.succ_le_succ (nat.le_add_right _ _)) (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)
lemma monotone_fact : monotone fact := λ n m, fact_le
lemma fact_lt (h0 : 0 < n) : n.fact < m.fact ↔ n < m :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rw [← not_le], intro hmn, apply not_le_of_lt h (fact_le hmn) },
{ have : ∀(n : ℕ), 0 < n → n.fact < n.succ.fact,
{ intros k hk, rw [fact_succ, succ_mul, lt_add_iff_pos_left],
apply mul_pos hk (fact_pos k) },
induction h generalizing h0,
{ exact this _ h0, },
{ refine lt_trans (h_ih h0) (this _ _), exact lt_trans h0 (lt_of_succ_le h_a) }}
end
lemma one_lt_fact : 1 < n.fact ↔ 1 < n :=
by { convert fact_lt _, refl, exact one_pos }
lemma fact_eq_one : n.fact = 1 ↔ n ≤ 1 :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rw [← not_lt, ← one_lt_fact, h], apply lt_irrefl },
{ cases h with h h, refl, cases h, refl }
end
lemma fact_inj (h0 : 1 < n.fact) : n.fact = m.fact ↔ n = m :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy n m with hnm|hnm|hnm,
{ exfalso, rw [← fact_lt, h] at hnm, exact lt_irrefl _ hnm,
rw [one_lt_fact] at h0, exact lt_trans one_pos h0 },
{ exact hnm },
{ exfalso, rw [← fact_lt, h] at hnm, exact lt_irrefl _ hnm,
rw [h, one_lt_fact] at h0, exact lt_trans one_pos h0 }},
{ rw h }
end
/- choose -/
/-- `choose n k` is the number of `k`-element subsets in an `n`-element set. Also known as binomial
coefficients. -/
def choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| _ 0 := 1
| 0 (k + 1) := 0
| (n + 1) (k + 1) := choose n k + choose n (k + 1)
@[simp] lemma choose_zero_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 0 = 1 := by cases n; refl
@[simp] lemma choose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : choose 0 (succ k) = 0 := rfl
lemma choose_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) : choose (succ n) (succ k) = choose n k + choose n (succ k) := rfl
lemma choose_eq_zero_of_lt : ∀ {n k}, n < k → choose n k = 0
| _ 0 hk := absurd hk dec_trivial
| 0 (k + 1) hk := choose_zero_succ _
| (n + 1) (k + 1) hk :=
have hnk : n < k, from lt_of_succ_lt_succ hk,
have hnk1 : n < k + 1, from lt_of_succ_lt hk,
by rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk1]
@[simp] lemma choose_self (n : ℕ) : choose n n = 1 :=
by induction n; simp [*, choose, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)]
@[simp] lemma choose_succ_self (n : ℕ) : choose n (succ n) = 0 :=
choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
@[simp] lemma choose_one_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 1 = n :=
by induction n; simp [*, choose, add_comm]
/-- `choose n 2` is the `n`-th triangle number. -/
lemma choose_two_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
simp,
{rw triangle_succ n, simp [choose, ih], rw add_comm},
end
lemma choose_pos : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → 0 < choose n k
| 0 _ hk := by rw [eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]; exact dec_trivial
| (n + 1) 0 hk := by simp; exact dec_trivial
| (n + 1) (k + 1) hk := by rw choose_succ_succ;
exact add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (choose_pos (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)) (nat.zero_le _)
lemma succ_mul_choose_eq : ∀ n k, succ n * choose n k = choose (succ n) (succ k) * succ k
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 (k + 1) := by simp [choose]
| (n + 1) 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) (k + 1) :=
by rw [choose_succ_succ (succ n) (succ k), add_mul, ←succ_mul_choose_eq, mul_succ,
←succ_mul_choose_eq, add_right_comm, ←mul_add, ←choose_succ_succ, ←succ_mul]
lemma choose_mul_fact_mul_fact : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → choose n k * fact k * fact (n - k) = fact n
| 0 _ hk := by simp [eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]
| (n + 1) 0 hk := by simp
| (n + 1) (succ k) hk :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le hk with hk₁ hk₁,
{ have h : choose n k * fact (succ k) * fact (n - k) = succ k * fact n :=
by rw ← choose_mul_fact_mul_fact (le_of_succ_le_succ hk);
simp [fact_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm],
have h₁ : fact (n - k) = (n - k) * fact (n - succ k) :=
by rw [← succ_sub_succ, succ_sub (le_of_lt_succ hk₁), fact_succ],
have h₂ : choose n (succ k) * fact (succ k) * ((n - k) * fact (n - succ k)) = (n - k) * fact n :=
by rw ← choose_mul_fact_mul_fact (le_of_lt_succ hk₁);
simp [fact_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc],
have h₃ : k * fact n ≤ n * fact n := mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_succ_le_succ hk),
rw [choose_succ_succ, add_mul, add_mul, succ_sub_succ, h, h₁, h₂, ← add_one, add_mul, nat.mul_sub_right_distrib,
fact_succ, ← nat.add_sub_assoc h₃, add_assoc, ← add_mul, nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm] },
{ simp [hk₁, mul_comm, choose, nat.sub_self] }
end
theorem choose_eq_fact_div_fact {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n k = fact n / (fact k * fact (n - k)) :=
begin
have : fact n = choose n k * (fact k * fact (n - k)) :=
by rw ← mul_assoc; exact (choose_mul_fact_mul_fact hk).symm,
exact (nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (mul_pos (fact_pos _) (fact_pos _)) this).symm
end
theorem fact_mul_fact_dvd_fact {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : fact k * fact (n - k) ∣ fact n :=
by rw [←choose_mul_fact_mul_fact hk, mul_assoc]; exact dvd_mul_left _ _
@[simp] lemma choose_symm {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n (n-k) = choose n k :=
by rw [choose_eq_fact_div_fact hk, choose_eq_fact_div_fact (sub_le _ _), nat.sub_sub_self hk, mul_comm]
lemma choose_symm_of_eq_add {n a b : ℕ} (h : n = a + b) : nat.choose n a = nat.choose n b :=
by { convert nat.choose_symm (nat.le_add_left _ _), rw nat.add_sub_cancel}
lemma choose_symm_add {a b : ℕ} : choose (a+b) a = choose (a+b) b :=
choose_symm_of_eq_add rfl
lemma choose_symm_half (m : ℕ) : choose (2 * m + 1) (m + 1) = choose (2 * m + 1) m :=
by { apply choose_symm_of_eq_add, rw [add_comm m 1, add_assoc 1 m m, add_comm (2 * m) 1, two_mul m] }
lemma choose_succ_right_eq (n k : ℕ) : choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) = choose n k * (n - k) :=
begin
have e : (n+1) * choose n k = choose n k * (k+1) + choose n (k+1) * (k+1),
rw [← right_distrib, ← choose_succ_succ, succ_mul_choose_eq],
rw [← nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add e, mul_comm, ← nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, nat.add_sub_add_right]
end
@[simp] lemma choose_succ_self_right : ∀ (n:ℕ), (n+1).choose n = n+1
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_succ_self_right, choose_self]
lemma choose_mul_succ_eq (n k : ℕ) :
(n.choose k) * (n + 1) = ((n+1).choose k) * (n + 1 - k) :=
begin
induction k with k ih, { simp },
by_cases hk : n < k + 1,
{ rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hk, sub_eq_zero_of_le hk, zero_mul, mul_zero] },
push_neg at hk,
replace hk : k + 1 ≤ n + 1 := _root_.le_add_right hk,
rw [choose_succ_succ],
rw [add_mul, succ_sub_succ],
rw [← choose_succ_right_eq],
rw [← succ_sub_succ, nat.mul_sub_left_distrib],
symmetry,
apply nat.add_sub_cancel',
exact mul_le_mul_left _ hk,
end
theorem units_eq_one (u : units ℕ) : u = 1 :=
units.ext $ nat.eq_one_of_dvd_one ⟨u.inv, u.val_inv.symm⟩
theorem add_units_eq_zero (u : add_units ℕ) : u = 0 :=
add_units.ext $ (nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero u.val_neg).1
@[simp] protected theorem is_unit_iff {n : ℕ} : is_unit n ↔ n = 1 :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨u, hu⟩, match n, u, hu, nat.units_eq_one u with _, _, rfl, rfl := rfl end)
(assume h, h.symm ▸ ⟨1, rfl⟩)
section find_greatest
/-- `find_greatest P b` is the largest `i ≤ bound` such that `P i` holds, or `0` if no such `i`
exists -/
protected def find_greatest (P : ℕ → Prop) [decidable_pred P] : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| (n + 1) := if P (n + 1) then n + 1 else find_greatest n
variables {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P]
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_zero : nat.find_greatest P 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_eq : ∀{b}, P b → nat.find_greatest P b = b
| 0 h := rfl
| (n + 1) h := by simp [nat.find_greatest, h]
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_of_not {b} (h : ¬ P (b + 1)) :
nat.find_greatest P (b + 1) = nat.find_greatest P b :=
by simp [nat.find_greatest, h]
lemma find_greatest_spec_and_le :
∀{b m}, m ≤ b → P m → P (nat.find_greatest P b) ∧ m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b
| 0 m hm hP :=
have m = 0, from le_antisymm hm (nat.zero_le _),
show P 0 ∧ m ≤ 0, from this ▸ ⟨hP, le_refl _⟩
| (b + 1) m hm hP :=
begin
by_cases h : P (b + 1),
{ simp [h, hm] },
{ have : m ≠ b + 1 := assume this, h $ this ▸ hP,
have : m ≤ b := (le_of_not_gt $ assume h : b + 1 ≤ m, this $ le_antisymm hm h),
have : P (nat.find_greatest P b) ∧ m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b :=
find_greatest_spec_and_le this hP,
simp [h, this] }
end
lemma find_greatest_spec {b} : (∃m, m ≤ b ∧ P m) → P (nat.find_greatest P b)
| ⟨m, hmb, hm⟩ := (find_greatest_spec_and_le hmb hm).1
lemma find_greatest_le : ∀ {b}, nat.find_greatest P b ≤ b
| 0 := le_refl _
| (b + 1) :=
have nat.find_greatest P b ≤ b + 1, from le_trans find_greatest_le (nat.le_succ b),
by by_cases P (b + 1); simp [h, this]
lemma le_find_greatest {b m} (hmb : m ≤ b) (hm : P m) : m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b :=
(find_greatest_spec_and_le hmb hm).2
lemma find_greatest_is_greatest {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] {b} :
(∃ m, m ≤ b ∧ P m) → ∀ k, nat.find_greatest P b < k ∧ k ≤ b → ¬ P k
| ⟨m, hmb, hP⟩ k ⟨hk, hkb⟩ hPk := lt_irrefl k $ lt_of_le_of_lt (le_find_greatest hkb hPk) hk
lemma find_greatest_eq_zero {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] :
∀ {b}, (∀ n ≤ b, ¬ P n) → nat.find_greatest P b = 0
| 0 h := find_greatest_zero
| (n + 1) h :=
begin
have := nat.find_greatest_of_not (h (n + 1) (le_refl _)),
rw this, exact find_greatest_eq_zero (assume k hk, h k (le_trans hk $ nat.le_succ _))
end
lemma find_greatest_of_ne_zero {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] :
∀ {b m}, nat.find_greatest P b = m → m ≠ 0 → P m
| 0 m rfl h := by { have := @find_greatest_zero P _, contradiction }
| (b + 1) m rfl h :=
decidable.by_cases
(assume hb : P (b + 1), by { have := find_greatest_eq hb, rw this, exact hb })
(assume hb : ¬ P (b + 1), find_greatest_of_ne_zero (find_greatest_of_not hb).symm h)
end find_greatest
section div
lemma dvd_div_of_mul_dvd {a b c : ℕ} (h : a * b ∣ c) : b ∣ c / a :=
if ha : a = 0 then
by simp [ha]
else
have ha : 0 < a, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero ha,
have h1 : ∃ d, c = a * b * d, from h,
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := h1 in
have hac : a ∣ c, from dvd_of_mul_right_dvd h,
have h2 : c / a = b * d, from nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right ha (by simpa [mul_assoc] using hd),
show ∃ d, c / a = b * d, from ⟨d, h2⟩
lemma mul_dvd_of_dvd_div {a b c : ℕ} (hab : c ∣ b) (h : a ∣ b / c) : c * a ∣ b :=
have h1 : ∃ d, b / c = a * d, from h,
have h2 : ∃ e, b = c * e, from hab,
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := h1, ⟨e, he⟩ := h2 in
have h3 : b = a * d * c, from
nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_left hab hd,
show ∃ d, b = c * a * d, from ⟨d, by cc⟩
lemma div_mul_div {a b c d : ℕ} (hab : b ∣ a) (hcd : d ∣ c) :
(a / b) * (c / d) = (a * c) / (b * d) :=
have exi1 : ∃ x, a = b * x, from hab,
have exi2 : ∃ y, c = d * y, from hcd,
if hb : b = 0 then by simp [hb]
else have 0 < b, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb,
if hd : d = 0 then by simp [hd]
else have 0 < d, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero hd,
begin
cases exi1 with x hx, cases exi2 with y hy,
rw [hx, hy, nat.mul_div_cancel_left, nat.mul_div_cancel_left],
symmetry,
apply nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left,
apply mul_pos,
repeat {assumption},
cc
end
lemma pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd {p m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hdiv : p ^ n ∣ k) : p ^ m ∣ k :=
have p ^ m ∣ p ^ n, from pow_dvd_pow _ hmn,
dvd_trans this hdiv
lemma dvd_of_pow_dvd {p k m : ℕ} (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hpk : p^k ∣ m) : p ∣ m :=
by rw ←nat.pow_one p; exact pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd hk hpk
lemma eq_of_dvd_of_div_eq_one {a b : ℕ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : b / a = 1) : a = b :=
by rw [←nat.div_mul_cancel w, h, one_mul]
lemma eq_zero_of_dvd_of_div_eq_zero {a b : ℕ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : b / a = 0) : b = 0 :=
by rw [←nat.div_mul_cancel w, h, zero_mul]
/-- If a small natural number is divisible by a larger natural number,
the small number is zero. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_dvd_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : b < a) : b = 0 :=
nat.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_div_eq_zero w
((nat.div_eq_zero_iff (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le b) h)).elim_right h)
lemma div_le_div_left {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : c ≤ b) (h₂ : 0 < c) : a / b ≤ a / c :=
(nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ h₂).2 $
le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ h₁) (div_mul_le_self _ _)
lemma div_eq_self {a b : ℕ} : a / b = a ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 1 :=
begin
split,
{ intro,
cases b,
{ simp * at * },
{ cases b,
{ right, refl },
{ left,
have : a / (b + 2) ≤ a / 2 := div_le_div_left (by simp) dec_trivial,
refine eq_zero_of_le_half _,
simp * at * } } },
{ rintros (rfl|rfl); simp }
end
end div
lemma exists_eq_add_of_le : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → ∃ k : ℕ, n = m + k
| 0 0 h := ⟨0, by simp⟩
| 0 (n+1) h := ⟨n+1, by simp⟩
| (m+1) (n+1) h :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_eq_add_of_le (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) in
⟨k, by simp [hk, add_comm, add_left_comm]⟩
lemma exists_eq_add_of_lt : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m < n → ∃ k : ℕ, n = m + k + 1
| 0 0 h := false.elim $ lt_irrefl _ h
| 0 (n+1) h := ⟨n, by simp⟩
| (m+1) (n+1) h := let ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_eq_add_of_le (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) in ⟨k, by simp [hk]⟩
lemma with_bot.add_eq_zero_iff : ∀ {n m : with_bot ℕ}, n + m = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 0
| none m := iff_of_false dec_trivial (λ h, absurd h.1 dec_trivial)
| n none := iff_of_false (by cases n; exact dec_trivial)
(λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial)
| (some n) (some m) := show (n + m : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ) ↔ (n : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ) ∧
(m : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ),
by rw [← with_bot.coe_add, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe, add_eq_zero_iff' (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)]
lemma with_bot.add_eq_one_iff : ∀ {n m : with_bot ℕ}, n + m = 1 ↔ (n = 0 ∧ m = 1) ∨ (n = 1 ∧ m = 0)
| none none := dec_trivial
| none (some m) := dec_trivial
| (some n) none := iff_of_false dec_trivial (λ h, h.elim (λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial)
(λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial))
| (some n) (some 0) := by erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe]; simp
| (some n) (some (m + 1)) := by erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe]; simp [nat.add_succ, nat.succ_inj', nat.succ_ne_zero]
@[simp] lemma with_bot.coe_nonneg {n : ℕ} : 0 ≤ (n : with_bot ℕ) :=
by rw [← with_bot.coe_zero, with_bot.coe_le_coe]; exact nat.zero_le _
@[simp] lemma with_bot.lt_zero_iff (n : with_bot ℕ) : n < 0 ↔ n = ⊥ :=
option.cases_on n dec_trivial (λ n, iff_of_false
(by simp [with_bot.some_eq_coe]) (λ h, option.no_confusion h))
-- induction
/-- Induction principle starting at a non-zero number. For maps to a `Sort*` see `le_rec_on`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma le_induction {P : nat → Prop} {m} (h0 : P m) (h1 : ∀ n, m ≤ n → P n → P (n + 1)) :
∀ n, m ≤ n → P n :=
by apply nat.less_than_or_equal.rec h0; exact h1
/-- Decreasing induction: if `P (k+1)` implies `P k`, then `P n` implies `P m` for all `m ≤ n`.
Also works for functions to `Sort*`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def decreasing_induction {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n)
(hP : P n) : P m :=
le_rec_on mn (λ k ih hsk, ih $ h k hsk) (λ h, h) hP
@[simp] lemma decreasing_induction_self {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {n : ℕ}
(nn : n ≤ n) (hP : P n) : (decreasing_induction h nn hP : P n) = hP :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_self] }
lemma decreasing_induction_succ {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n)
(msn : m ≤ n + 1) (hP : P (n+1)) :
(decreasing_induction h msn hP : P m) = decreasing_induction h mn (h n hP) :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_succ] }
@[simp] lemma decreasing_induction_succ' {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m : ℕ}
(msm : m ≤ m + 1) (hP : P (m+1)) : (decreasing_induction h msm hP : P m) = h m hP :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_succ'] }
lemma decreasing_induction_trans {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n k : ℕ}
(mn : m ≤ n) (nk : n ≤ k) (hP : P k) :
(decreasing_induction h (le_trans mn nk) hP : P m) =
decreasing_induction h mn (decreasing_induction h nk hP) :=
by { induction nk with k nk ih, rw [decreasing_induction_self],
rw [decreasing_induction_succ h (le_trans mn nk), ih, decreasing_induction_succ] }
lemma decreasing_induction_succ_left {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ}
(smn : m + 1 ≤ n) (mn : m ≤ n) (hP : P n) :
(decreasing_induction h mn hP : P m) = h m (decreasing_induction h smn hP) :=
by { rw [subsingleton.elim mn (le_trans (le_succ m) smn), decreasing_induction_trans,
decreasing_induction_succ'] }
end nat
|
797379f9580a1a0484c66c9bd307eeede0943185 | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /stage0/src/Lean/Meta/SortLocalDecls.lean | f51ce34e258a3b9e6caef3bfd2dc732bb5b74529 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,806 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Basic
namespace Lean.Meta
namespace SortLocalDecls
structure Context where
localDecls : NameMap LocalDecl := {}
structure State where
visited : NameSet := {}
result : Array LocalDecl := #[]
abbrev M := ReaderT Context $ StateRefT State MetaM
mutual
partial def visitExpr (e : Expr) : M Unit := do
match e with
| Expr.proj _ _ e _ => visitExpr e
| Expr.forallE _ d b _ => visitExpr d; visitExpr b
| Expr.lam _ d b _ => visitExpr d; visitExpr b
| Expr.letE _ t v b _ => visitExpr t; visitExpr v; visitExpr b
| Expr.app f a _ => visitExpr f; visitExpr a
| Expr.mdata _ b _ => visitExpr b
| Expr.mvar _ _ => let v ← instantiateMVars e; unless v.isMVar do visitExpr v
| Expr.fvar fvarId _ => if let some localDecl := (← read).localDecls.find? fvarId.name then visitLocalDecl localDecl
| _ => return ()
partial def visitLocalDecl (localDecl : LocalDecl) : M Unit := do
unless (← get).visited.contains localDecl.fvarId.name do
modify fun s => { s with visited := s.visited.insert localDecl.fvarId.name }
visitExpr localDecl.type
if let some val := localDecl.value? then
visitExpr val
modify fun s => { s with result := s.result.push localDecl }
end
end SortLocalDecls
open SortLocalDecls in
def sortLocalDecls (localDecls : Array LocalDecl) : MetaM (Array LocalDecl) :=
let aux : M (Array LocalDecl) := do localDecls.forM visitLocalDecl; return (← get).result
aux.run { localDecls := localDecls.foldl (init := {}) fun s d => s.insert d.fvarId.name d } |>.run' {}
end Lean.Meta
|
473f8923bb58e948dadb25211044ac2fe1510fc9 | 4767244035cdd124e1ce3d0c81128f8929df6163 | /algebra/group.lean | bc4a8dc6432873a2a7601fcceff6ce8c6556f2a3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | 5HT/mathlib | b941fecacd31a9c5dd0abad58770084b8a1e56b1 | 40fa9ade2f5649569639608db5e621e5fad0cc02 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,978,681,358 | 1,546,681,764,000 | 1,546,681,764,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 29,050 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
Various multiplicative and additive structures.
-/
import tactic.interactive data.option.defs
section pending_1857
/- Transport multiplicative to additive -/
section transport
open tactic
@[user_attribute]
meta def to_additive_attr : user_attribute (name_map name) name :=
{ name := `to_additive,
descr := "Transport multiplicative to additive",
cache_cfg := ⟨λ ns, ns.mfoldl (λ dict n, do
val ← to_additive_attr.get_param n,
pure $ dict.insert n val) mk_name_map, []⟩,
parser := lean.parser.ident,
after_set := some $ λ src _ _, do
env ← get_env,
dict ← to_additive_attr.get_cache,
tgt ← to_additive_attr.get_param src,
(get_decl tgt >> skip) <|>
transport_with_dict dict src tgt }
end transport
/- map operations -/
attribute [to_additive has_add.add] has_mul.mul
attribute [to_additive has_zero.zero] has_one.one
attribute [to_additive has_neg.neg] has_inv.inv
attribute [to_additive has_add] has_mul
attribute [to_additive has_zero] has_one
attribute [to_additive has_neg] has_inv
/- map constructors -/
attribute [to_additive has_add.mk] has_mul.mk
attribute [to_additive has_zero.mk] has_one.mk
attribute [to_additive has_neg.mk] has_inv.mk
/- map structures -/
attribute [to_additive add_semigroup] semigroup
attribute [to_additive add_semigroup.mk] semigroup.mk
attribute [to_additive add_semigroup.to_has_add] semigroup.to_has_mul
attribute [to_additive add_semigroup.add_assoc] semigroup.mul_assoc
attribute [to_additive add_semigroup.add] semigroup.mul
attribute [to_additive add_comm_semigroup] comm_semigroup
attribute [to_additive add_comm_semigroup.mk] comm_semigroup.mk
attribute [to_additive add_comm_semigroup.to_add_semigroup] comm_semigroup.to_semigroup
attribute [to_additive add_comm_semigroup.add_comm] comm_semigroup.mul_comm
attribute [to_additive add_left_cancel_semigroup] left_cancel_semigroup
attribute [to_additive add_left_cancel_semigroup.mk] left_cancel_semigroup.mk
attribute [to_additive add_left_cancel_semigroup.to_add_semigroup] left_cancel_semigroup.to_semigroup
attribute [to_additive add_left_cancel_semigroup.add_left_cancel] left_cancel_semigroup.mul_left_cancel
attribute [to_additive add_right_cancel_semigroup] right_cancel_semigroup
attribute [to_additive add_right_cancel_semigroup.mk] right_cancel_semigroup.mk
attribute [to_additive add_right_cancel_semigroup.to_add_semigroup] right_cancel_semigroup.to_semigroup
attribute [to_additive add_right_cancel_semigroup.add_right_cancel] right_cancel_semigroup.mul_right_cancel
attribute [to_additive add_monoid] monoid
attribute [to_additive add_monoid.mk] monoid.mk
attribute [to_additive add_monoid.to_has_zero] monoid.to_has_one
attribute [to_additive add_monoid.to_add_semigroup] monoid.to_semigroup
attribute [to_additive add_monoid.add] monoid.mul
attribute [to_additive add_monoid.add_assoc] monoid.mul_assoc
attribute [to_additive add_monoid.zero] monoid.one
attribute [to_additive add_monoid.zero_add] monoid.one_mul
attribute [to_additive add_monoid.add_zero] monoid.mul_one
attribute [to_additive add_comm_monoid] comm_monoid
attribute [to_additive add_comm_monoid.mk] comm_monoid.mk
attribute [to_additive add_comm_monoid.to_add_monoid] comm_monoid.to_monoid
attribute [to_additive add_comm_monoid.to_add_comm_semigroup] comm_monoid.to_comm_semigroup
attribute [to_additive add_group] group
attribute [to_additive add_group.mk] group.mk
attribute [to_additive add_group.to_has_neg] group.to_has_inv
attribute [to_additive add_group.to_add_monoid] group.to_monoid
attribute [to_additive add_group.add_left_neg] group.mul_left_inv
attribute [to_additive add_group.add] group.mul
attribute [to_additive add_group.add_assoc] group.mul_assoc
attribute [to_additive add_group.zero] group.one
attribute [to_additive add_group.zero_add] group.one_mul
attribute [to_additive add_group.add_zero] group.mul_one
attribute [to_additive add_group.neg] group.inv
attribute [to_additive add_comm_group] comm_group
attribute [to_additive add_comm_group.mk] comm_group.mk
attribute [to_additive add_comm_group.to_add_group] comm_group.to_group
attribute [to_additive add_comm_group.to_add_comm_monoid] comm_group.to_comm_monoid
/- map theorems -/
attribute [to_additive add_assoc] mul_assoc
attribute [to_additive add_semigroup_to_is_associative] semigroup_to_is_associative
attribute [to_additive add_comm] mul_comm
attribute [to_additive add_comm_semigroup_to_is_commutative] comm_semigroup_to_is_commutative
attribute [to_additive add_left_comm] mul_left_comm
attribute [to_additive add_right_comm] mul_right_comm
attribute [to_additive add_left_cancel] mul_left_cancel
attribute [to_additive add_right_cancel] mul_right_cancel
attribute [to_additive add_left_cancel_iff] mul_left_cancel_iff
attribute [to_additive add_right_cancel_iff] mul_right_cancel_iff
attribute [to_additive zero_add] one_mul
attribute [to_additive add_zero] mul_one
attribute [to_additive add_left_neg] mul_left_inv
attribute [to_additive neg_add_self] inv_mul_self
attribute [to_additive neg_add_cancel_left] inv_mul_cancel_left
attribute [to_additive neg_add_cancel_right] inv_mul_cancel_right
attribute [to_additive neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero] inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one
attribute [to_additive neg_zero] one_inv
attribute [to_additive neg_neg] inv_inv
attribute [to_additive add_right_neg] mul_right_inv
attribute [to_additive add_neg_self] mul_inv_self
attribute [to_additive neg_inj] inv_inj
attribute [to_additive add_group.add_left_cancel] group.mul_left_cancel
attribute [to_additive add_group.add_right_cancel] group.mul_right_cancel
attribute [to_additive add_group.to_left_cancel_add_semigroup] group.to_left_cancel_semigroup
attribute [to_additive add_group.to_right_cancel_add_semigroup] group.to_right_cancel_semigroup
attribute [to_additive add_neg_cancel_left] mul_inv_cancel_left
attribute [to_additive add_neg_cancel_right] mul_inv_cancel_right
attribute [to_additive neg_add_rev] mul_inv_rev
attribute [to_additive eq_neg_of_eq_neg] eq_inv_of_eq_inv
attribute [to_additive eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero] eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one
attribute [to_additive eq_add_neg_of_add_eq] eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq
attribute [to_additive eq_neg_add_of_add_eq] eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq
attribute [to_additive neg_add_eq_of_eq_add] inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul
attribute [to_additive add_neg_eq_of_eq_add] mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul
attribute [to_additive eq_add_of_add_neg_eq] eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq
attribute [to_additive eq_add_of_neg_add_eq] eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq
attribute [to_additive add_eq_of_eq_neg_add] mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul
attribute [to_additive add_eq_of_eq_add_neg] mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv
attribute [to_additive neg_add] mul_inv
end pending_1857
instance monoid_to_is_left_id {α : Type*} [monoid α]
: is_left_id α (*) 1 :=
⟨ monoid.one_mul ⟩
instance monoid_to_is_right_id {α : Type*} [monoid α]
: is_right_id α (*) 1 :=
⟨ monoid.mul_one ⟩
instance add_monoid_to_is_left_id {α : Type*} [add_monoid α]
: is_left_id α (+) 0 :=
⟨ add_monoid.zero_add ⟩
instance add_monoid_to_is_right_id {α : Type*} [add_monoid α]
: is_right_id α (+) 0 :=
⟨ add_monoid.add_zero ⟩
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
def additive (α : Type*) := α
def multiplicative (α : Type*) := α
instance [semigroup α] : add_semigroup (additive α) :=
{ add := ((*) : α → α → α),
add_assoc := @mul_assoc _ _ }
instance [add_semigroup α] : semigroup (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul := ((+) : α → α → α),
mul_assoc := @add_assoc _ _ }
instance [comm_semigroup α] : add_comm_semigroup (additive α) :=
{ add_comm := @mul_comm _ _,
..additive.add_semigroup }
instance [add_comm_semigroup α] : comm_semigroup (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul_comm := @add_comm _ _,
..multiplicative.semigroup }
instance [left_cancel_semigroup α] : add_left_cancel_semigroup (additive α) :=
{ add_left_cancel := @mul_left_cancel _ _,
..additive.add_semigroup }
instance [add_left_cancel_semigroup α] : left_cancel_semigroup (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul_left_cancel := @add_left_cancel _ _,
..multiplicative.semigroup }
instance [right_cancel_semigroup α] : add_right_cancel_semigroup (additive α) :=
{ add_right_cancel := @mul_right_cancel _ _,
..additive.add_semigroup }
instance [add_right_cancel_semigroup α] : right_cancel_semigroup (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul_right_cancel := @add_right_cancel _ _,
..multiplicative.semigroup }
@[simp, to_additive add_left_inj]
theorem mul_left_inj [left_cancel_semigroup α] (a : α) {b c : α} : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
⟨mul_left_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp, to_additive add_right_inj]
theorem mul_right_inj [right_cancel_semigroup α] (a : α) {b c : α} : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
⟨mul_right_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
structure units (α : Type u) [monoid α] :=
(val : α)
(inv : α)
(val_inv : val * inv = 1)
(inv_val : inv * val = 1)
namespace units
variables [monoid α] {a b c : units α}
instance : has_coe (units α) α := ⟨val⟩
@[extensionality] theorem ext : ∀ {a b : units α}, (a : α) = b → a = b
| ⟨v, i₁, vi₁, iv₁⟩ ⟨v', i₂, vi₂, iv₂⟩ e :=
by change v = v' at e; subst v'; congr;
simpa only [iv₂, vi₁, one_mul, mul_one] using mul_assoc i₂ v i₁
theorem ext_iff {a b : units α} : a = b ↔ (a : α) = b :=
⟨congr_arg _, ext⟩
instance [decidable_eq α] : decidable_eq (units α)
| a b := decidable_of_iff' _ ext_iff
protected def mul (u₁ u₂ : units α) : units α :=
⟨u₁.val * u₂.val, u₂.inv * u₁.inv,
have u₁.val * (u₂.val * u₂.inv) * u₁.inv = 1,
by rw [u₂.val_inv]; rw [mul_one, u₁.val_inv],
by simpa only [mul_assoc],
have u₂.inv * (u₁.inv * u₁.val) * u₂.val = 1,
by rw [u₁.inv_val]; rw [mul_one, u₂.inv_val],
by simpa only [mul_assoc]⟩
protected def inv' (u : units α) : units α :=
⟨u.inv, u.val, u.inv_val, u.val_inv⟩
instance : has_mul (units α) := ⟨units.mul⟩
instance : has_one (units α) := ⟨⟨1, 1, mul_one 1, one_mul 1⟩⟩
instance : has_inv (units α) := ⟨units.inv'⟩
variables (a b)
@[simp] lemma coe_mul : (↑(a * b) : α) = a * b := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ((1 : units α) : α) = 1 := rfl
lemma val_coe : (↑a : α) = a.val := rfl
lemma coe_inv : ((a⁻¹ : units α) : α) = a.inv := rfl
@[simp] lemma inv_mul : (↑a⁻¹ * a : α) = 1 := inv_val _
@[simp] lemma mul_inv : (a * ↑a⁻¹ : α) = 1 := val_inv _
@[simp] lemma mul_inv_cancel_left (a : units α) (b : α) : (a:α) * (↑a⁻¹ * b) = b :=
by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_inv, one_mul]
@[simp] lemma inv_mul_cancel_left (a : units α) (b : α) : (↑a⁻¹:α) * (a * b) = b :=
by rw [← mul_assoc, inv_mul, one_mul]
@[simp] lemma mul_inv_cancel_right (a : α) (b : units α) : a * b * ↑b⁻¹ = a :=
by rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv, mul_one]
@[simp] lemma inv_mul_cancel_right (a : α) (b : units α) : a * ↑b⁻¹ * b = a :=
by rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul, mul_one]
instance : group (units α) :=
by refine {mul := (*), one := 1, inv := has_inv.inv, ..};
{ intros, apply ext, simp only [coe_mul, coe_one,
mul_assoc, one_mul, mul_one, inv_mul] }
instance {α} [comm_monoid α] : comm_group (units α) :=
{ mul_comm := λ u₁ u₂, ext $ mul_comm _ _, ..units.group }
instance [has_repr α] : has_repr (units α) := ⟨repr ∘ val⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_left_inj (a : units α) {b c : α} : (a:α) * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left] using congr_arg ((*) ↑(a⁻¹ : units α)) h, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_right_inj (a : units α) {b c : α} : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right] using congr_arg (* ↑(a⁻¹ : units α)) h, congr_arg _⟩
end units
theorem nat.units_eq_one (u : units ℕ) : u = 1 :=
units.ext $ nat.eq_one_of_dvd_one ⟨u.inv, u.val_inv.symm⟩
def units.mk_of_mul_eq_one [comm_monoid α] (a b : α) (hab : a * b = 1) : units α :=
⟨a, b, hab, (mul_comm b a).trans hab⟩
@[to_additive with_zero]
def with_one (α) := option α
@[to_additive with_zero.has_coe_t]
instance : has_coe_t α (with_one α) := ⟨some⟩
instance [semigroup α] : monoid (with_one α) :=
{ one := none,
mul := option.lift_or_get (*),
mul_assoc := (option.lift_or_get_assoc _).1,
one_mul := (option.lift_or_get_is_left_id _).1,
mul_one := (option.lift_or_get_is_right_id _).1 }
attribute [to_additive with_zero.add_monoid._proof_1] with_one.monoid._proof_1
attribute [to_additive with_zero.add_monoid._proof_2] with_one.monoid._proof_2
attribute [to_additive with_zero.add_monoid._proof_3] with_one.monoid._proof_3
attribute [to_additive with_zero.add_monoid] with_one.monoid
instance [semigroup α] : mul_zero_class (with_zero α) :=
{ zero := none,
mul := λ o₁ o₂, o₁.bind (λ a, o₂.map (λ b, a * b)),
zero_mul := λ a, rfl,
mul_zero := λ a, by cases a; refl,
..with_zero.add_monoid }
instance [semigroup α] : semigroup (with_zero α) :=
{ mul_assoc := λ a b c, match a, b, c with
| none, _, _ := rfl
| some a, none, _ := rfl
| some a, some b, none := rfl
| some a, some b, some c := congr_arg some (mul_assoc _ _ _)
end,
..with_zero.mul_zero_class }
instance [comm_semigroup α] : comm_semigroup (with_zero α) :=
{ mul_comm := λ a b, match a, b with
| none, _ := (mul_zero _).symm
| some a, none := rfl
| some a, some b := congr_arg some (mul_comm _ _)
end,
..with_zero.semigroup }
instance [monoid α] : monoid (with_zero α) :=
{ one := some 1,
one_mul := λ a, match a with
| none := rfl
| some a := congr_arg some $ one_mul _
end,
mul_one := λ a, match a with
| none := rfl
| some a := congr_arg some $ mul_one _
end,
..with_zero.semigroup }
instance [comm_monoid α] : comm_monoid (with_zero α) :=
{ ..with_zero.monoid, ..with_zero.comm_semigroup }
instance [monoid α] : add_monoid (additive α) :=
{ zero := (1 : α),
zero_add := @one_mul _ _,
add_zero := @mul_one _ _,
..additive.add_semigroup }
instance [add_monoid α] : monoid (multiplicative α) :=
{ one := (0 : α),
one_mul := @zero_add _ _,
mul_one := @add_zero _ _,
..multiplicative.semigroup }
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {a b c : α}
/-- Partial division. It is defined when the
second argument is invertible, and unlike the division operator
in `division_ring` it is not totalized at zero. -/
def divp (a : α) (u) : α := a * (u⁻¹ : units α)
infix ` /ₚ `:70 := divp
@[simp] theorem divp_self (u : units α) : (u : α) /ₚ u = 1 := units.mul_inv _
@[simp] theorem divp_one (a : α) : a /ₚ 1 = a := mul_one _
theorem divp_assoc (a b : α) (u : units α) : a * b /ₚ u = a * (b /ₚ u) :=
mul_assoc _ _ _
@[simp] theorem divp_mul_cancel (a : α) (u : units α) : a /ₚ u * u = a :=
(mul_assoc _ _ _).trans $ by rw [units.inv_mul, mul_one]
@[simp] theorem mul_divp_cancel (a : α) (u : units α) : (a * u) /ₚ u = a :=
(mul_assoc _ _ _).trans $ by rw [units.mul_inv, mul_one]
@[simp] theorem divp_right_inj (u : units α) {a b : α} : a /ₚ u = b /ₚ u ↔ a = b :=
units.mul_right_inj _
theorem divp_eq_one (a : α) (u : units α) : a /ₚ u = 1 ↔ a = u :=
(units.mul_right_inj u).symm.trans $ by rw [divp_mul_cancel, one_mul]
@[simp] theorem one_divp (u : units α) : 1 /ₚ u = ↑u⁻¹ :=
one_mul _
end monoid
instance [comm_semigroup α] : comm_monoid (with_one α) :=
{ mul_comm := (option.lift_or_get_comm _).1,
..with_one.monoid }
instance [add_comm_semigroup α] : add_comm_monoid (with_zero α) :=
{ add_comm := (option.lift_or_get_comm _).1,
..with_zero.add_monoid }
attribute [to_additive with_zero.add_comm_monoid] with_one.comm_monoid
instance [comm_monoid α] : add_comm_monoid (additive α) :=
{ add_comm := @mul_comm α _,
..additive.add_monoid }
instance [add_comm_monoid α] : comm_monoid (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul_comm := @add_comm α _,
..multiplicative.monoid }
instance [group α] : add_group (additive α) :=
{ neg := @has_inv.inv α _,
add_left_neg := @mul_left_inv _ _,
..additive.add_monoid }
instance [add_group α] : group (multiplicative α) :=
{ inv := @has_neg.neg α _,
mul_left_inv := @add_left_neg _ _,
..multiplicative.monoid }
section group
variables [group α] {a b c : α}
instance : has_lift α (units α) :=
⟨λ a, ⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_self _, inv_mul_self _⟩⟩
@[simp, to_additive neg_inj']
theorem inv_inj' : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← inv_inv a, h, inv_inv], congr_arg _⟩
@[to_additive eq_of_neg_eq_neg]
theorem eq_of_inv_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ → a = b :=
inv_inj'.1
@[simp, to_additive add_self_iff_eq_zero]
theorem mul_self_iff_eq_one : a * a = a ↔ a = 1 :=
by have := @mul_left_inj _ _ a a 1; rwa mul_one at this
@[simp, to_additive neg_eq_zero]
theorem inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
by rw [← @inv_inj' _ _ a 1, one_inv]
@[simp, to_additive neg_ne_zero]
theorem inv_ne_one : a⁻¹ ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
not_congr inv_eq_one
@[to_additive left_inverse_neg]
theorem left_inverse_inv (α) [group α] :
function.left_inverse (λ a : α, a⁻¹) (λ a, a⁻¹) :=
assume a, inv_inv a
attribute [simp] mul_inv_cancel_left add_neg_cancel_left
mul_inv_cancel_right add_neg_cancel_right
@[to_additive eq_neg_iff_eq_neg]
theorem eq_inv_iff_eq_inv : a = b⁻¹ ↔ b = a⁻¹ :=
⟨eq_inv_of_eq_inv, eq_inv_of_eq_inv⟩
@[to_additive neg_eq_iff_neg_eq]
theorem inv_eq_iff_inv_eq : a⁻¹ = b ↔ b⁻¹ = a :=
by rw [eq_comm, @eq_comm _ _ a, eq_inv_iff_eq_inv]
@[to_additive add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv : a * b = 1 ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
by simpa [mul_left_inv, -mul_right_inj] using @mul_right_inj _ _ b a (b⁻¹)
@[to_additive add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq : a * b = 1 ↔ a⁻¹ = b :=
by rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, eq_inv_iff_eq_inv, eq_comm]
@[to_additive eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero]
theorem eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one : a = b⁻¹ ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv.symm
@[to_additive neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero]
theorem inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq.symm
@[to_additive eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq]
theorem eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq : a = b * c⁻¹ ↔ a * c = b :=
⟨λ h, by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_right], λ h, by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
@[to_additive eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq]
theorem eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq : a = b⁻¹ * c ↔ b * a = c :=
⟨λ h, by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left], λ h, by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add]
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul : a⁻¹ * b = c ↔ b = a * c :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left], λ h, by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add]
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul : a * b⁻¹ = c ↔ a = c * b :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right], λ h, by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
@[to_additive add_neg_eq_zero]
theorem mul_inv_eq_one {a b : α} : a * b⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = b :=
by rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_inv]
@[to_additive neg_comm_of_comm]
theorem inv_comm_of_comm {a b : α} (H : a * b = b * a) : a⁻¹ * b = b * a⁻¹ :=
begin
have : a⁻¹ * (b * a) * a⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * (a * b) * a⁻¹ :=
congr_arg (λ x:α, a⁻¹ * x * a⁻¹) H.symm,
rwa [inv_mul_cancel_left, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_right] at this
end
end group
instance [comm_group α] : add_comm_group (additive α) :=
{ add_comm := @mul_comm α _,
..additive.add_group }
instance [add_comm_group α] : comm_group (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul_comm := @add_comm α _,
..multiplicative.group }
section add_monoid
variables [add_monoid α] {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma bit0_zero : bit0 (0 : α) = 0 := add_zero _
@[simp] lemma bit1_zero [has_one α] : bit1 (0 : α) = 1 :=
show 0+0+1=(1:α), by rw [zero_add, zero_add]
end add_monoid
section add_group
variables [add_group α] {a b c : α}
local attribute [simp] sub_eq_add_neg
def sub_sub_cancel := @sub_sub_self
@[simp] lemma sub_left_inj : a - b = a - c ↔ b = c :=
(add_left_inj _).trans neg_inj'
@[simp] lemma sub_right_inj : b - a = c - a ↔ b = c :=
add_right_inj _
lemma sub_add_sub_cancel (a b c : α) : (a - b) + (b - c) = a - c :=
by rw [← add_sub_assoc, sub_add_cancel]
lemma sub_sub_sub_cancel_right (a b c : α) : (a - c) - (b - c) = a - b :=
by rw [← neg_sub c b, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_add_sub_cancel]
theorem sub_eq_zero : a - b = 0 ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_sub_eq_zero, λ h, by rw [h, sub_self]⟩
theorem sub_ne_zero : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_congr sub_eq_zero
theorem eq_sub_iff_add_eq : a = b - c ↔ a + c = b :=
eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq
theorem sub_eq_iff_eq_add : a - b = c ↔ a = c + b :=
add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add
theorem eq_iff_eq_of_sub_eq_sub {a b c d : α} (H : a - b = c - d) : a = b ↔ c = d :=
by rw [← sub_eq_zero, H, sub_eq_zero]
theorem left_inverse_sub_add_left (c : α) : function.left_inverse (λ x, x - c) (λ x, x + c) :=
assume x, add_sub_cancel x c
theorem left_inverse_add_left_sub (c : α) : function.left_inverse (λ x, x + c) (λ x, x - c) :=
assume x, sub_add_cancel x c
theorem left_inverse_add_right_neg_add (c : α) :
function.left_inverse (λ x, c + x) (λ x, - c + x) :=
assume x, add_neg_cancel_left c x
theorem left_inverse_neg_add_add_right (c : α) :
function.left_inverse (λ x, - c + x) (λ x, c + x) :=
assume x, neg_add_cancel_left c x
end add_group
section add_comm_group
variables [add_comm_group α] {a b c : α}
lemma sub_eq_neg_add (a b : α) : a - b = -b + a :=
add_comm _ _
theorem neg_add' (a b : α) : -(a + b) = -a - b := neg_add a b
lemma neg_sub_neg (a b : α) : -a - -b = b - a := by simp
lemma eq_sub_iff_add_eq' : a = b - c ↔ c + a = b :=
by rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, add_comm]
lemma sub_eq_iff_eq_add' : a - b = c ↔ a = b + c :=
by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, add_comm]
lemma add_sub_cancel' (a b : α) : a + b - a = b :=
by rw [sub_eq_neg_add, neg_add_cancel_left]
lemma add_sub_cancel'_right (a b : α) : a + (b - a) = b :=
by rw [← add_sub_assoc, add_sub_cancel']
lemma sub_right_comm (a b c : α) : a - b - c = a - c - b :=
add_right_comm _ _ _
lemma sub_add_sub_cancel' (a b c : α) : (a - b) + (c - a) = c - b :=
by rw add_comm; apply sub_add_sub_cancel
lemma sub_sub_sub_cancel_left (a b c : α) : (c - a) - (c - b) = b - a :=
by rw [← neg_sub b c, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, sub_add_sub_cancel]
end add_comm_group
section is_conj
variables [group α] [group β]
def is_conj (a b : α) := ∃ c : α, c * a * c⁻¹ = b
@[refl] lemma is_conj_refl (a : α) : is_conj a a :=
⟨1, by rw [one_mul, one_inv, mul_one]⟩
@[symm] lemma is_conj_symm (a b : α) : is_conj a b → is_conj b a
| ⟨c, hc⟩ := ⟨c⁻¹, by rw [← hc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_right, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
@[trans] lemma is_conj_trans (a b c : α) : is_conj a b → is_conj b c → is_conj a c
| ⟨c₁, hc₁⟩ ⟨c₂, hc₂⟩ := ⟨c₂ * c₁, by rw [← hc₂, ← hc₁, mul_inv_rev]; simp only [mul_assoc]⟩
@[simp] lemma is_conj_iff_eq {α : Type*} [comm_group α] {a b : α} : is_conj a b ↔ a = b :=
⟨λ ⟨c, hc⟩, by rw [← hc, mul_right_comm, mul_inv_self, one_mul], λ h, by rw h⟩
end is_conj
class is_monoid_hom [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
(map_one : f 1 = 1)
(map_mul : ∀ {x y}, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
class is_add_monoid_hom [add_monoid α] [add_monoid β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
(map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(map_add : ∀ {x y}, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
attribute [to_additive is_add_monoid_hom] is_monoid_hom
attribute [to_additive is_add_monoid_hom.map_add] is_monoid_hom.map_mul
attribute [to_additive is_add_monoid_hom.mk] is_monoid_hom.mk
namespace is_monoid_hom
variables [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α → β) [is_monoid_hom f]
@[to_additive is_add_monoid_hom.id]
instance id : is_monoid_hom (@id α) := by refine {..}; intros; refl
@[to_additive is_add_monoid_hom.id]
instance comp {γ} [monoid γ] (g : β → γ) [is_monoid_hom g] :
is_monoid_hom (g ∘ f) :=
{ map_mul := λ x y, show g _ = g _ * g _, by rw [map_mul f, map_mul g],
map_one := show g _ = 1, by rw [map_one f, map_one g] }
instance is_add_monoid_hom_mul_left {γ : Type*} [semiring γ] (x : γ) : is_add_monoid_hom (λ y : γ, x * y) :=
by refine_struct {..}; simp [mul_add]
instance is_add_monoid_hom_mul_right {γ : Type*} [semiring γ] (x : γ) : is_add_monoid_hom (λ y : γ, y * x) :=
by refine_struct {..}; simp [add_mul]
end is_monoid_hom
-- TODO rename fields of is_group_hom: mul ↝ map_mul?
/-- Predicate for group homomorphism. -/
class is_group_hom [group α] [group β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
(mul : ∀ a b : α, f (a * b) = f a * f b)
class is_add_group_hom [add_group α] [add_group β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
(add : ∀ a b, f (a + b) = f a + f b)
attribute [to_additive is_add_group_hom] is_group_hom
attribute [to_additive is_add_group_hom.add] is_group_hom.mul
attribute [to_additive is_add_group_hom.mk] is_group_hom.mk
namespace is_group_hom
variables [group α] [group β] (f : α → β) [is_group_hom f]
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom.zero]
theorem one : f 1 = 1 :=
mul_self_iff_eq_one.1 $ by rw [← mul f, one_mul]
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom.neg]
theorem inv (a : α) : f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹ :=
eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one $ by rw [← mul f, inv_mul_self, one f]
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom.id]
instance id : is_group_hom (@id α) :=
⟨λ _ _, rfl⟩
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom.comp]
instance comp {γ} [group γ] (g : β → γ) [is_group_hom g] :
is_group_hom (g ∘ f) :=
⟨λ x y, show g _ = g _ * g _, by rw [mul f, mul g]⟩
protected lemma is_conj (f : α → β) [is_group_hom f] {a b : α} : is_conj a b → is_conj (f a) (f b)
| ⟨c, hc⟩ := ⟨f c, by rw [← is_group_hom.mul f, ← is_group_hom.inv f, ← is_group_hom.mul f, hc]⟩
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom.to_is_add_monoid_hom]
lemma to_is_monoid_hom (f : α → β) [is_group_hom f] : is_monoid_hom f :=
⟨is_group_hom.one f, is_group_hom.mul f⟩
attribute [instance] is_group_hom.to_is_monoid_hom
is_add_group_hom.to_is_add_monoid_hom
end is_group_hom
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom_add]
lemma is_group_hom_mul {α β} [group α] [comm_group β]
(f g : α → β) [is_group_hom f] [is_group_hom g] :
is_group_hom (λa, f a * g a) :=
⟨assume a b, by simp only [is_group_hom.mul f, is_group_hom.mul g, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]⟩
attribute [instance] is_group_hom_mul is_add_group_hom_add
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom_neg]
lemma is_group_hom_inv {α β} [group α] [comm_group β] (f : α → β) [is_group_hom f] :
is_group_hom (λa, (f a)⁻¹) :=
⟨assume a b, by rw [is_group_hom.mul f, mul_inv]⟩
attribute [instance] is_group_hom_inv is_add_group_hom_neg
@[to_additive neg.is_add_group_hom]
lemma inv.is_group_hom [comm_group α] : is_group_hom (has_inv.inv : α → α) :=
⟨by simp [mul_inv_rev, mul_comm]⟩
attribute [instance] inv.is_group_hom neg.is_add_group_hom
/-- Predicate for group anti-homomorphism, or a homomorphism
into the opposite group. -/
class is_group_anti_hom {β : Type*} [group α] [group β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
(mul : ∀ a b : α, f (a * b) = f b * f a)
namespace is_group_anti_hom
variables [group α] [group β] (f : α → β) [w : is_group_anti_hom f]
include w
theorem one : f 1 = 1 :=
mul_self_iff_eq_one.1 $ by rw [← mul f, one_mul]
theorem inv (a : α) : f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹ :=
eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one $ by rw [← mul f, mul_inv_self, one f]
end is_group_anti_hom
theorem inv_is_group_anti_hom [group α] : is_group_anti_hom (λ x : α, x⁻¹) :=
⟨mul_inv_rev⟩
namespace is_add_group_hom
variables [add_group α] [add_group β] (f : α → β) [is_add_group_hom f]
lemma sub (a b) : f (a - b) = f a - f b :=
calc f (a - b) = f (a + -b) : rfl
... = f a + f (-b) : add f _ _
... = f a - f b : by simp[neg f]
end is_add_group_hom
lemma is_add_group_hom_sub {α β} [add_group α] [add_comm_group β]
(f g : α → β) [is_add_group_hom f] [is_add_group_hom g] :
is_add_group_hom (λa, f a - g a) :=
is_add_group_hom_add f (λa, - g a)
attribute [instance] is_add_group_hom_sub
namespace units
variables [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α → β) [is_monoid_hom f]
definition map : units α → units β :=
λ u, ⟨f u.val, f u.inv,
by rw [← is_monoid_hom.map_mul f, u.val_inv, is_monoid_hom.map_one f],
by rw [← is_monoid_hom.map_mul f, u.inv_val, is_monoid_hom.map_one f] ⟩
instance : is_group_hom (units.map f) :=
⟨λ a b, by ext; exact is_monoid_hom.map_mul f ⟩
instance : is_monoid_hom (coe : units α → α) :=
⟨by simp, by simp⟩
end units
|
01a1cc521ba37daaac7f2eed3b42cedffbf17c45 | b29f946a2f0afd23ef86b9219116968babbb9f4f | /src/xenalib/M1P1.lean | 6e8d0048fbde747562d76d6507d4303cc07da021 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ImperialCollegeLondon/M1P1-lean | 58be7394fded719d95e45e6b10e1ecf2ed3c7c4c | 3723468cc50f8bebd00a9811caf25224a578de17 | refs/heads/master | 1,587,063,867,779 | 1,572,727,164,000 | 1,572,727,164,000 | 165,845,802 | 14 | 4 | Apache-2.0 | 1,549,730,698,000 | 1,547,554,675,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 619 | lean | import tactic.linarith data.real.basic
local notation `|` x `|` := abs x
lemma zero_of_abs_lt_all (x : ℝ) (h : ∀ ε > 0, |x| < ε) : x = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_abs_eq_zero $ eq_of_le_of_forall_le_of_dense (abs_nonneg x) $ λ ε ε_pos, le_of_lt (h ε ε_pos)
-- The next few things should be hidden
@[user_attribute]
meta def ineq_rules : user_attribute :=
{ name := `ineq_rules,
descr := "lemmas usable to prove inequalities" }
attribute [ineq_rules] add_lt_add le_max_left le_max_right
meta def obvious_ineq := `[linarith <|> apply_rules ineq_rules]
run_cmd add_interactive [`obvious_ineq]
-- end of scary things
|
81a3835eceda080738414af725c2bb01a8e23218 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /doc/examples/NFM2022/nfm15.lean | 46e493c70d37f560a4e1543c22efa1039f4bd826 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 702 | lean | /- intro tactic variants -/
example (p q : α → Prop) : (∃ x, p x ∧ q x) → ∃ x, q x ∧ p x := by
intro h
match h with
| Exists.intro w (And.intro hp hq) => exact Exists.intro w (And.intro hq hp)
example (p q : α → Prop) : (∃ x, p x ∧ q x) → ∃ x, q x ∧ p x := by
intro (Exists.intro _ (And.intro hp hq))
exact Exists.intro _ (And.intro hq hp)
example (p q : α → Prop) : (∃ x, p x ∧ q x) → ∃ x, q x ∧ p x := by
intro ⟨_, hp, hq⟩
exact ⟨_, hq, hp⟩
example (α : Type) (p q : α → Prop) : (∃ x, p x ∨ q x) → ∃ x, q x ∨ p x := by
intro
| ⟨_, .inl h⟩ => exact ⟨_, .inr h⟩
| ⟨_, .inr h⟩ => exact ⟨_, .inl h⟩
|
d80da5de05ff143e353716aaa56e5815bdcc88d7 | 48eee836fdb5c613d9a20741c17db44c8e12e61c | /src/util/prod.lean | c6eab8909af7b44a85c923a57de24ee66a1461cf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fgdorais/lean-universal | 06430443a4abe51e303e602684c2977d1f5c0834 | 9259b0f7fb3aa83a9e0a7a3eaa44c262e42cc9b1 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,479,744,136 | 1,589,473,399,000 | 1,589,473,399,000 | 196,287,552 | 1 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 427 | lean | -- Copyright © 2019 François G. Dorais. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
def prod.eq {α : Type*} {β : Type*} : Π {x y : prod α β}, x.fst = y.fst → x.snd = y.snd → x = y
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ rfl rfl := rfl
def pprod.eq {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} : Π {x y : pprod α β}, x.fst = y.fst → x.snd = y.snd → x = y
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ rfl rfl := rfl
|
e7d7f231c8449888b4d0e3b5c3f4d26b3801e7c0 | 137c667471a40116a7afd7261f030b30180468c2 | /src/analysis/normed_space/basic.lean | 2a1d595f8a6ee418c30899e3e53178483af04ff7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bragadeesh153/mathlib | 46bf814cfb1eecb34b5d1549b9117dc60f657792 | b577bb2cd1f96eb47031878256856020b76f73cd | refs/heads/master | 1,687,435,188,334 | 1,626,384,207,000 | 1,626,384,207,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 85,857 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.punit_instances
import topology.instances.nnreal
import topology.algebra.module
import topology.algebra.algebra
import topology.algebra.group_completion
import topology.metric_space.completion
import topology.algebra.ordered.liminf_limsup
import topology.sequences
/-!
# Normed spaces
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `∥x∥ = 0 → x = 0` we start setting up the
theory of `semi_normed_group` and we specialize to `normed_group` at the end.
-/
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {ι : Type*}
noncomputable theory
open filter metric
open_locale topological_space big_operators nnreal ennreal uniformity
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`. This class is designed to
be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm. -/
class has_norm (α : Type*) := (norm : α → ℝ)
export has_norm (norm)
notation `∥` e `∥` := norm e
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ∥x - y∥`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class semi_normed_group (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, add_comm_group α, pseudo_metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ∥x - y∥` defines
a metric space structure. -/
class normed_group (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, add_comm_group α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
/-- A normed group is a seminormed group. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_group.to_semi_normed_group [β : normed_group α] : semi_normed_group α :=
{ ..β }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a translation invariant pseudodistance -/
def semi_normed_group.of_add_dist [has_norm α] [add_comm_group α] [pseudo_metric_space α]
(H1 : ∀ x:α, ∥x∥ = dist x 0)
(H2 : ∀ x y z : α, dist x y ≤ dist (x + z) (y + z)) : semi_normed_group α :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw H1, apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_right_neg y], apply H2 },
{ have := H2 (x-y) 0 y, rwa [sub_add_cancel, zero_add] at this }
end }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a translation invariant pseudodistance -/
def semi_normed_group.of_add_dist' [has_norm α] [add_comm_group α] [pseudo_metric_space α]
(H1 : ∀ x:α, ∥x∥ = dist x 0)
(H2 : ∀ x y z : α, dist (x + z) (y + z) ≤ dist x y) : semi_normed_group α :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw H1, apply le_antisymm,
{ have := H2 (x-y) 0 y, rwa [sub_add_cancel, zero_add] at this },
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_right_neg y], apply H2 }
end }
/-- A seminormed group can be built from a seminorm that satisfies algebraic properties. This is
formalised in this structure. -/
structure semi_normed_group.core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α] : Prop :=
(norm_zero : ∥(0 : α)∥ = 0)
(triangle : ∀ x y : α, ∥x + y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ + ∥y∥)
(norm_neg : ∀ x : α, ∥-x∥ = ∥x∥)
/-- Constructing a seminormed group from core properties of a seminorm, i.e., registering the
pseudodistance and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. -/
noncomputable def semi_normed_group.of_core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α]
(C : semi_normed_group.core α) : semi_normed_group α :=
{ dist := λ x y, ∥x - y∥,
dist_eq := assume x y, by refl,
dist_self := assume x, by simp [C.norm_zero],
dist_triangle := assume x y z,
calc ∥x - z∥ = ∥x - y + (y - z)∥ : by rw sub_add_sub_cancel
... ≤ ∥x - y∥ + ∥y - z∥ : C.triangle _ _,
dist_comm := assume x y,
calc ∥x - y∥ = ∥ -(y - x)∥ : by simp
... = ∥y - x∥ : by { rw [C.norm_neg] } }
instance : normed_group punit :=
{ norm := function.const _ 0,
dist_eq := λ _ _, rfl, }
@[simp] lemma punit.norm_eq_zero (r : punit) : ∥r∥ = 0 := rfl
instance : normed_group ℝ :=
{ norm := λ x, abs x,
dist_eq := assume x y, rfl }
lemma real.norm_eq_abs (r : ℝ) : ∥r∥ = abs r := rfl
section semi_normed_group
variables [semi_normed_group α] [semi_normed_group β]
lemma dist_eq_norm (g h : α) : dist g h = ∥g - h∥ :=
semi_normed_group.dist_eq _ _
lemma dist_eq_norm' (g h : α) : dist g h = ∥h - g∥ :=
by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma dist_zero_right (g : α) : dist g 0 = ∥g∥ :=
by rw [dist_eq_norm, sub_zero]
@[simp] lemma dist_zero_left : dist (0:α) = norm :=
funext $ λ g, by rw [dist_comm, dist_zero_right]
lemma tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top [proper_space α] :
tendsto norm (cocompact α) at_top :=
by simpa only [dist_zero_right] using tendsto_dist_right_cocompact_at_top (0:α)
lemma norm_sub_rev (g h : α) : ∥g - h∥ = ∥h - g∥ :=
by simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using dist_comm g h
@[simp] lemma norm_neg (g : α) : ∥-g∥ = ∥g∥ :=
by simpa using norm_sub_rev 0 g
@[simp] lemma dist_add_left (g h₁ h₂ : α) : dist (g + h₁) (g + h₂) = dist h₁ h₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma dist_add_right (g₁ g₂ h : α) : dist (g₁ + h) (g₂ + h) = dist g₁ g₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma dist_neg_neg (g h : α) : dist (-g) (-h) = dist g h :=
by simp only [dist_eq_norm, neg_sub_neg, norm_sub_rev]
@[simp] lemma dist_sub_left (g h₁ h₂ : α) : dist (g - h₁) (g - h₂) = dist h₁ h₂ :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, dist_add_left, dist_neg_neg]
@[simp] lemma dist_sub_right (g₁ g₂ h : α) : dist (g₁ - h) (g₂ - h) = dist g₁ g₂ :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using dist_add_right _ _ _
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
lemma norm_add_le (g h : α) : ∥g + h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using dist_triangle g 0 (-h)
lemma norm_add_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ : α} {n₁ n₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ∥g₁∥ ≤ n₁) (H₂ : ∥g₂∥ ≤ n₂) :
∥g₁ + g₂∥ ≤ n₁ + n₂ :=
le_trans (norm_add_le g₁ g₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ dist g₁ h₁ + dist g₂ h₂ :=
by simpa only [dist_add_left, dist_add_right] using dist_triangle (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂)
lemma dist_add_add_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α} {d₁ d₂ : ℝ}
(H₁ : dist g₁ h₁ ≤ d₁) (H₂ : dist g₂ h₂ ≤ d₂) :
dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ d₁ + d₂ :=
le_trans (dist_add_add_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_sub_sub_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
dist (g₁ - g₂) (h₁ - h₂) ≤ dist g₁ h₁ + dist g₂ h₂ :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, dist_neg_neg] using dist_add_add_le g₁ (-g₂) h₁ (-h₂)
lemma dist_sub_sub_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α} {d₁ d₂ : ℝ}
(H₁ : dist g₁ h₁ ≤ d₁) (H₂ : dist g₂ h₂ ≤ d₂) :
dist (g₁ - g₂) (h₁ - h₂) ≤ d₁ + d₂ :=
le_trans (dist_sub_sub_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma abs_dist_sub_le_dist_add_add (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
abs (dist g₁ h₁ - dist g₂ h₂) ≤ dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) :=
by simpa only [dist_add_left, dist_add_right, dist_comm h₂]
using abs_dist_sub_le (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) (h₁ + g₂)
@[simp] lemma norm_nonneg (g : α) : 0 ≤ ∥g∥ :=
by { rw[←dist_zero_right], exact dist_nonneg }
@[simp] lemma norm_zero : ∥(0:α)∥ = 0 := by rw [← dist_zero_right, dist_self]
@[nontriviality] lemma norm_of_subsingleton [subsingleton α] (x : α) : ∥x∥ = 0 :=
by rw [subsingleton.elim x 0, norm_zero]
lemma norm_sum_le {β} : ∀(s : finset β) (f : β → α), ∥∑ a in s, f a∥ ≤ ∑ a in s, ∥ f a ∥ :=
finset.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le
lemma norm_sum_le_of_le {β} (s : finset β) {f : β → α} {n : β → ℝ} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ∥f b∥ ≤ n b) :
∥∑ b in s, f b∥ ≤ ∑ b in s, n b :=
le_trans (norm_sum_le s f) (finset.sum_le_sum h)
lemma norm_sub_le (g h : α) : ∥g - h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using dist_triangle g 0 h
lemma norm_sub_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ : α} {n₁ n₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ∥g₁∥ ≤ n₁) (H₂ : ∥g₂∥ ≤ n₂) :
∥g₁ - g₂∥ ≤ n₁ + n₂ :=
le_trans (norm_sub_le g₁ g₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_le_norm_add_norm (g h : α) : dist g h ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by { rw dist_eq_norm, apply norm_sub_le }
lemma abs_norm_sub_norm_le (g h : α) : abs(∥g∥ - ∥h∥) ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using abs_dist_sub_le g h 0
lemma norm_sub_norm_le (g h : α) : ∥g∥ - ∥h∥ ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_norm_sub_norm_le g h)
lemma dist_norm_norm_le (g h : α) : dist ∥g∥ ∥h∥ ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le g h
lemma norm_le_insert (u v : α) : ∥v∥ ≤ ∥u∥ + ∥u - v∥ :=
calc ∥v∥ = ∥u - (u - v)∥ : by abel
... ≤ ∥u∥ + ∥u - v∥ : norm_sub_le u _
lemma norm_le_insert' (u v : α) : ∥u∥ ≤ ∥v∥ + ∥u - v∥ :=
by { rw norm_sub_rev, exact norm_le_insert v u }
lemma ball_0_eq (ε : ℝ) : ball (0:α) ε = {x | ∥x∥ < ε} :=
set.ext $ assume a, by simp
lemma mem_ball_iff_norm {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ ball g r ↔ ∥h - g∥ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm]
lemma add_mem_ball_iff_norm {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
g + h ∈ ball g r ↔ ∥h∥ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball_iff_norm, add_sub_cancel']
lemma mem_ball_iff_norm' {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ ball g r ↔ ∥g - h∥ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma mem_ball_0_iff {ε : ℝ} {x : α} : x ∈ ball (0 : α) ε ↔ ∥x∥ < ε :=
by rw [mem_ball, dist_zero_right]
lemma mem_closed_ball_iff_norm {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ closed_ball g r ↔ ∥h - g∥ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm]
lemma add_mem_closed_ball_iff_norm {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
g + h ∈ closed_ball g r ↔ ∥h∥ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball_iff_norm, add_sub_cancel']
lemma mem_closed_ball_iff_norm' {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ closed_ball g r ↔ ∥g - h∥ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball', dist_eq_norm]
lemma norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball {g h : α} {r : ℝ} (H : h ∈ closed_ball g r) :
∥h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + r :=
calc
∥h∥ = ∥g + (h - g)∥ : by rw [add_sub_cancel'_right]
... ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h - g∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... ≤ ∥g∥ + r : by { apply add_le_add_left, rw ← dist_eq_norm, exact H }
lemma norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le {a b : α} {c : ℝ} (h : dist a b ≤ c) :
∥a∥ ≤ ∥b∥ + c :=
norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball h
lemma norm_lt_of_mem_ball {g h : α} {r : ℝ} (H : h ∈ ball g r) :
∥h∥ < ∥g∥ + r :=
calc
∥h∥ = ∥g + (h - g)∥ : by rw [add_sub_cancel'_right]
... ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h - g∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... < ∥g∥ + r : by { apply add_lt_add_left, rw ← dist_eq_norm, exact H }
lemma norm_lt_norm_add_const_of_dist_lt {a b : α} {c : ℝ} (h : dist a b < c) :
∥a∥ < ∥b∥ + c :=
norm_lt_of_mem_ball h
lemma bounded_iff_forall_norm_le {s : set α} : bounded s ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ∥x∥ ≤ C :=
begin
rw bounded_iff_subset_ball (0 : α),
exact exists_congr (λ r, by simp [(⊆), set.subset]),
end
@[simp] lemma mem_sphere_iff_norm (v w : α) (r : ℝ) : w ∈ sphere v r ↔ ∥w - v∥ = r :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm {w : α} {r : ℝ} : w ∈ sphere (0:α) r ↔ ∥w∥ = r :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_of_mem_sphere {r : ℝ} (x : sphere (0:α) r) : ∥(x:α)∥ = r :=
mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm.mp x.2
lemma ne_zero_of_norm_pos {g : α} : 0 < ∥ g ∥ → g ≠ 0 :=
begin
intros hpos hzero,
rw [hzero, norm_zero] at hpos,
exact lt_irrefl 0 hpos,
end
lemma nonzero_of_mem_sphere {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : sphere (0:α) r) : (x:α) ≠ 0 :=
begin
refine ne_zero_of_norm_pos _,
rwa norm_eq_of_mem_sphere x,
end
lemma nonzero_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (0:α) 1) : (x:α) ≠ 0 :=
by { apply nonzero_of_mem_sphere, norm_num }
/-- We equip the sphere, in a seminormed group, with a formal operation of negation, namely the
antipodal map. -/
instance {r : ℝ} : has_neg (sphere (0:α) r) :=
{ neg := λ w, ⟨-↑w, by simp⟩ }
@[simp] lemma coe_neg_sphere {r : ℝ} (v : sphere (0:α) r) :
(((-v) : sphere _ _) : α) = - (v:α) :=
rfl
namespace isometric
/-- Addition `y ↦ y + x` as an `isometry`. -/
protected def add_right (x : α) : α ≃ᵢ α :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 $ λ y z, dist_add_right _ _ _,
.. equiv.add_right x }
@[simp] lemma add_right_to_equiv (x : α) :
(isometric.add_right x).to_equiv = equiv.add_right x := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_add_right (x : α) : (isometric.add_right x : α → α) = λ y, y + x := rfl
lemma add_right_apply (x y : α) : (isometric.add_right x : α → α) y = y + x := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_right_symm (x : α) :
(isometric.add_right x).symm = isometric.add_right (-x) :=
ext $ λ y, rfl
/-- Addition `y ↦ x + y` as an `isometry`. -/
protected def add_left (x : α) : α ≃ᵢ α :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 $ λ y z, dist_add_left _ _ _,
to_equiv := equiv.add_left x }
@[simp] lemma add_left_to_equiv (x : α) :
(isometric.add_left x).to_equiv = equiv.add_left x := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_add_left (x : α) : ⇑(isometric.add_left x) = (+) x := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_left_symm (x : α) :
(isometric.add_left x).symm = isometric.add_left (-x) :=
ext $ λ y, rfl
variable (α)
/-- Negation `x ↦ -x` as an `isometry`. -/
protected def neg : α ≃ᵢ α :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 $ λ x y, dist_neg_neg _ _,
to_equiv := equiv.neg α }
variable {α}
@[simp] lemma neg_symm : (isometric.neg α).symm = isometric.neg α := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_to_equiv : (isometric.neg α).to_equiv = equiv.neg α := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_neg : ⇑(isometric.neg α) = has_neg.neg := rfl
end isometric
theorem normed_group.tendsto_nhds_zero {f : γ → α} {l : filter γ} :
tendsto f l (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ∥ f x ∥ < ε :=
metric.tendsto_nhds.trans $ by simp only [dist_zero_right]
lemma normed_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : α → β} {x : α} {y : β} :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ∥x' - x∥ < δ → ∥f x' - y∥ < ε :=
by simp_rw [metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm]
lemma normed_group.cauchy_seq_iff {u : ℕ → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → ∥u m - u n∥ < ε :=
by simp [metric.cauchy_seq_iff, dist_eq_norm]
lemma cauchy_seq.add {u v : ℕ → α} (hu : cauchy_seq u) (hv : cauchy_seq v) : cauchy_seq (u + v) :=
begin
rw normed_group.cauchy_seq_iff at *,
intros ε ε_pos,
rcases hu (ε/2) (half_pos ε_pos) with ⟨Nu, hNu⟩,
rcases hv (ε/2) (half_pos ε_pos) with ⟨Nv, hNv⟩,
use max Nu Nv,
intros m n hm hn,
replace hm := max_le_iff.mp hm,
replace hn := max_le_iff.mp hn,
calc ∥(u + v) m - (u + v) n∥ = ∥u m + v m - (u n + v n)∥ : rfl
... = ∥(u m - u n) + (v m - v n)∥ : by abel
... ≤ ∥u m - u n∥ + ∥v m - v n∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... < ε : by linarith only [hNu m n hm.1 hn.1, hNv m n hm.2 hn.2]
end
open finset
lemma cauchy_seq_sum_of_eventually_eq {u v : ℕ → α} {N : ℕ} (huv : ∀ n ≥ N, u n = v n)
(hv : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∑ k in range (n+1), v k)) : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), u k) :=
begin
let d : ℕ → α := λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), (u k - v k),
rw show (λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), u k) = d + (λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), v k),
by { ext n, simp [d] },
have : ∀ n ≥ N, d n = d N,
{ intros n hn,
dsimp [d],
rw eventually_constant_sum _ hn,
intros m hm,
simp [huv m hm] },
exact (tendsto_at_top_of_eventually_const this).cauchy_seq.add hv
end
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`. -/
lemma add_monoid_hom.lipschitz_of_bound (f :α →+ β) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀x, ∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥) :
lipschitz_with (real.to_nnreal C) f :=
lipschitz_with.of_dist_le' $ λ x y, by simpa only [dist_eq_norm, f.map_sub] using h (x - y)
lemma lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le {f : α → β} {C : ℝ≥0} {s : set α} :
lipschitz_on_with C f s ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), ∥f x - f y∥ ≤ C * ∥x - y∥ :=
by simp only [lipschitz_on_with_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm]
lemma lipschitz_on_with.norm_sub_le {f : α → β} {C : ℝ≥0} {s : set α} (h : lipschitz_on_with C f s)
{x y : α} (x_in : x ∈ s) (y_in : y ∈ s) : ∥f x - f y∥ ≤ C * ∥x - y∥ :=
lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le.mp h x x_in y y_in
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥`.
The analogous condition for a linear map of normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`. -/
lemma add_monoid_hom.continuous_of_bound (f : α →+ β) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀x, ∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥) :
continuous f :=
(f.lipschitz_of_bound C h).continuous
lemma is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on {γ : Type*} [topological_space γ]
{s : set γ} (hs : is_compact s) {f : γ → α} (hf : continuous_on f s) :
∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ∥f x∥ ≤ C :=
begin
have : bounded (f '' s) := (hs.image_of_continuous_on hf).bounded,
rcases bounded_iff_forall_norm_le.1 this with ⟨C, hC⟩,
exact ⟨C, λ x hx, hC _ (set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx)⟩,
end
lemma add_monoid_hom.isometry_iff_norm (f : α →+ β) : isometry f ↔ ∀ x, ∥f x∥ = ∥x∥ :=
begin
simp only [isometry_emetric_iff_metric, dist_eq_norm, ← f.map_sub],
refine ⟨λ h x, _, λ h x y, h _⟩,
simpa using h x 0
end
lemma add_monoid_hom.isometry_of_norm (f : α →+ β) (hf : ∀ x, ∥f x∥ = ∥x∥) : isometry f :=
f.isometry_iff_norm.2 hf
lemma controlled_sum_of_mem_closure {s : add_subgroup α} {g : α}
(hg : g ∈ closure (s : set α)) {b : ℕ → ℝ} (b_pos : ∀ n, 0 < b n) :
∃ v : ℕ → α,
tendsto (λ n, ∑ i in range (n+1), v i) at_top (𝓝 g) ∧
(∀ n, v n ∈ s) ∧
∥v 0 - g∥ < b 0 ∧
∀ n > 0, ∥v n∥ < b n :=
begin
obtain ⟨u : ℕ → α, u_in : ∀ n, u n ∈ s, lim_u : tendsto u at_top (𝓝 g)⟩ :=
mem_closure_iff_seq_limit.mp hg,
obtain ⟨n₀, hn₀⟩ : ∃ n₀, ∀ n ≥ n₀, ∥u n - g∥ < b 0,
{ have : {x | ∥x - g∥ < b 0} ∈ 𝓝 g,
{ simp_rw ← dist_eq_norm,
exact metric.ball_mem_nhds _ (b_pos _) },
exact filter.tendsto_at_top'.mp lim_u _ this },
set z : ℕ → α := λ n, u (n + n₀),
have lim_z : tendsto z at_top (𝓝 g) := lim_u.comp (tendsto_add_at_top_nat n₀),
have mem_𝓤 : ∀ n, {p : α × α | ∥p.1 - p.2∥ < b (n + 1)} ∈ 𝓤 α :=
λ n, by simpa [← dist_eq_norm] using metric.dist_mem_uniformity (b_pos $ n+1),
obtain ⟨φ : ℕ → ℕ, φ_extr : strict_mono φ,
hφ : ∀ n, ∥z (φ $ n + 1) - z (φ n)∥ < b (n + 1)⟩ :=
lim_z.cauchy_seq.subseq_mem mem_𝓤,
set w : ℕ → α := z ∘ φ,
have hw : tendsto w at_top (𝓝 g),
from lim_z.comp φ_extr.tendsto_at_top,
set v : ℕ → α := λ i, if i = 0 then w 0 else w i - w (i - 1),
refine ⟨v, tendsto.congr (finset.eq_sum_range_sub' w) hw , _,
hn₀ _ (n₀.le_add_left _), _⟩,
{ rintro ⟨⟩,
{ change w 0 ∈ s,
apply u_in },
{ apply s.sub_mem ; apply u_in }, },
{ intros l hl,
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ : ∃ k, l = k+1, exact nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hl),
apply hφ },
end
lemma controlled_sum_of_mem_closure_range {j : α →+ β} {h : β}
(Hh : h ∈ (closure $ (j.range : set β))) {b : ℕ → ℝ} (b_pos : ∀ n, 0 < b n) :
∃ g : ℕ → α,
tendsto (λ n, ∑ i in range (n+1), j (g i)) at_top (𝓝 h) ∧
∥j (g 0) - h∥ < b 0 ∧
∀ n > 0, ∥j (g n)∥ < b n :=
begin
rcases controlled_sum_of_mem_closure Hh b_pos with ⟨v, sum_v, v_in, hv₀, hv_pos⟩,
choose g hg using v_in,
change ∀ (n : ℕ), j (g n) = v n at hg,
refine ⟨g, by simpa [← hg] using sum_v, by simpa [hg 0] using hv₀, λ n hn,
by simpa [hg] using hv_pos n hn⟩
end
section nnnorm
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0`. -/
class has_nnnorm (α : Type*) := (nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0)
export has_nnnorm (nnnorm)
notation `∥`e`∥₊` := nnnorm e
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_group.to_has_nnnorm : has_nnnorm α := ⟨λ a, ⟨norm a, norm_nonneg a⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nnnorm (a : α) : (∥a∥₊ : ℝ) = norm a := rfl
lemma nndist_eq_nnnorm (a b : α) : nndist a b = ∥a - b∥₊ := nnreal.eq $ dist_eq_norm _ _
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_zero : ∥(0 : α)∥₊ = 0 :=
nnreal.eq norm_zero
lemma nnnorm_add_le (g h : α) : ∥g + h∥₊ ≤ ∥g∥₊ + ∥h∥₊ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ norm_add_le g h
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_neg (g : α) : ∥-g∥₊ = ∥g∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_neg g
lemma nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le (g h : α) : nndist ∥g∥₊ ∥h∥₊ ≤ ∥g - h∥₊ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ dist_norm_norm_le g h
lemma of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm (x : β) : ennreal.of_real ∥x∥ = (∥x∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) :=
ennreal.of_real_eq_coe_nnreal _
lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub (x y : β) : edist x y = (∥x - y∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm, of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm (x : β) : edist x 0 = (∥x∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by rw [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub, _root_.sub_zero]
lemma mem_emetric_ball_0_iff {x : β} {r : ℝ≥0∞} : x ∈ emetric.ball (0 : β) r ↔ ↑∥x∥₊ < r :=
by rw [emetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma nndist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
nndist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ nndist g₁ h₁ + nndist g₂ h₂ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ dist_add_add_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂
lemma edist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
edist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ edist g₁ h₁ + edist g₂ h₂ :=
by { simp only [edist_nndist], norm_cast, apply nndist_add_add_le }
lemma nnnorm_sum_le {β} : ∀(s : finset β) (f : β → α),
∥∑ a in s, f a∥₊ ≤ ∑ a in s, ∥f a∥₊ :=
finset.le_sum_of_subadditive nnnorm nnnorm_zero nnnorm_add_le
end nnnorm
lemma lipschitz_with.neg {α : Type*} [pseudo_emetric_space α] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with K f) : lipschitz_with K (λ x, -f x) :=
λ x y, by simpa only [edist_dist, dist_neg_neg] using hf x y
lemma lipschitz_with.add {α : Type*} [pseudo_emetric_space α] {Kf : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x + g x) :=
λ x y,
calc edist (f x + g x) (f y + g y) ≤ edist (f x) (f y) + edist (g x) (g y) :
edist_add_add_le _ _ _ _
... ≤ Kf * edist x y + Kg * edist x y :
add_le_add (hf x y) (hg x y)
... = (Kf + Kg) * edist x y :
(add_mul _ _ _).symm
lemma lipschitz_with.sub {α : Type*} [pseudo_emetric_space α] {Kf : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x - g x) :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
lemma antilipschitz_with.add_lipschitz_with {α : Type*} [pseudo_metric_space α] {Kf : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} (hf : antilipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g)
(hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) : antilipschitz_with (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ (λ x, f x + g x) :=
begin
refine antilipschitz_with.of_le_mul_dist (λ x y, _),
rw [nnreal.coe_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
rw le_div_iff (nnreal.coe_pos.2 $ nnreal.sub_pos.2 hK),
rw [mul_comm, nnreal.coe_sub (le_of_lt hK), sub_mul],
calc ↑Kf⁻¹ * dist x y - Kg * dist x y ≤ dist (f x) (f y) - dist (g x) (g y) :
sub_le_sub (hf.mul_le_dist x y) (hg.dist_le_mul x y)
... ≤ _ : le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_dist_sub_le_dist_add_add _ _ _ _)
end
lemma antilipschitz_with.add_sub_lipschitz_with {α : Type*} [pseudo_metric_space α] {Kf : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} (hf : antilipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg (g - f))
(hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) : antilipschitz_with (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ g :=
by simpa only [pi.sub_apply, add_sub_cancel'_right] using hf.add_lipschitz_with hg hK
/-- A subgroup of a seminormed group is also a seminormed group,
with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance add_subgroup.semi_normed_group {E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] (s : add_subgroup E) :
semi_normed_group s :=
{ norm := λx, norm (x : E),
dist_eq := λx y, dist_eq_norm (x : E) (y : E) }
/-- If `x` is an element of a subgroup `s` of a seminormed group `E`, its norm in `s` is equal to
its norm in `E`. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_norm_subgroup {E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] {s : add_subgroup E} (x : s) :
∥x∥ = ∥(x:E)∥ :=
rfl
/-- A submodule of a seminormed group is also a seminormed group, with the restriction of the norm.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
instance submodule.semi_normed_group {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} (s : submodule 𝕜 E) : semi_normed_group s :=
{ norm := λx, norm (x : E),
dist_eq := λx y, dist_eq_norm (x : E) (y : E) }
/-- If `x` is an element of a submodule `s` of a normed group `E`, its norm in `E` is equal to its
norm in `s`.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma submodule.norm_coe {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} {s : submodule 𝕜 E} (x : s) :
∥(x : E)∥ = ∥x∥ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma submodule.norm_mk {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} {s : submodule 𝕜 E} (x : E) (hx : x ∈ s) :
∥(⟨x, hx⟩ : s)∥ = ∥x∥ :=
rfl
/-- seminormed group instance on the product of two seminormed groups, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.semi_normed_group : semi_normed_group (α × β) :=
{ norm := λx, max ∥x.1∥ ∥x.2∥,
dist_eq := assume (x y : α × β),
show max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2) = (max ∥(x - y).1∥ ∥(x - y).2∥), by simp [dist_eq_norm] }
lemma prod.semi_norm_def (x : α × β) : ∥x∥ = (max ∥x.1∥ ∥x.2∥) := rfl
lemma prod.nnsemi_norm_def (x : α × β) : ∥x∥₊ = max (∥x.1∥₊) (∥x.2∥₊) :=
by { have := x.semi_norm_def, simp only [← coe_nnnorm] at this, exact_mod_cast this }
lemma semi_norm_fst_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.1∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_left _ _
lemma semi_norm_snd_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.2∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_right _ _
lemma semi_norm_prod_le_iff {x : α × β} {r : ℝ} :
∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∥x.1∥ ≤ r ∧ ∥x.2∥ ≤ r :=
max_le_iff
/-- seminormed group instance on the product of finitely many seminormed groups,
using the sup norm. -/
instance pi.semi_normed_group {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, semi_normed_group (π i)] :
semi_normed_group (Πi, π i) :=
{ norm := λf, ((finset.sup finset.univ (λ b, ∥f b∥₊) : ℝ≥0) : ℝ),
dist_eq := assume x y,
congr_arg (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) $ congr_arg (finset.sup finset.univ) $ funext $ assume a,
show nndist (x a) (y a) = ∥x a - y a∥₊, from nndist_eq_nnnorm _ _ }
/-- The seminorm of an element in a product space is `≤ r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
lemma pi_semi_norm_le_iff {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, semi_normed_group (π i)] {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 ≤ r) {x : Πi, π i} : ∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∀i, ∥x i∥ ≤ r :=
by simp only [← dist_zero_right, dist_pi_le_iff hr, pi.zero_apply]
/-- The seminorm of an element in a product space is `< r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
lemma pi_semi_norm_lt_iff {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, semi_normed_group (π i)] {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 < r) {x : Πi, π i} : ∥x∥ < r ↔ ∀i, ∥x i∥ < r :=
by simp only [← dist_zero_right, dist_pi_lt_iff hr, pi.zero_apply]
lemma semi_norm_le_pi_norm {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, semi_normed_group (π i)] (x : Πi, π i)
(i : ι) : ∥x i∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
(pi_semi_norm_le_iff (norm_nonneg x)).1 (le_refl _) i
@[simp] lemma pi_semi_norm_const [nonempty ι] [fintype ι] (a : α) : ∥(λ i : ι, a)∥ = ∥a∥ :=
by simpa only [← dist_zero_right] using dist_pi_const a 0
@[simp] lemma pi_nnsemi_norm_const [nonempty ι] [fintype ι] (a : α) :
∥(λ i : ι, a)∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ pi_semi_norm_const a
lemma tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero {f : ι → β} {a : filter ι} {b : β} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 b) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ∥f e - b∥) a (𝓝 0) :=
by { convert tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero, simp [dist_eq_norm] }
lemma is_bounded_under_of_tendsto {l : filter ι} {f : ι → α} {c : α}
(h : filter.tendsto f l (𝓝 c)) : is_bounded_under (≤) l (λ x, ∥f x∥) :=
⟨∥c∥ + 1, @tendsto.eventually ι α f _ _ (λ k, ∥k∥ ≤ ∥c∥ + 1) h (filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem.mpr
⟨metric.closed_ball c 1, metric.closed_ball_mem_nhds c zero_lt_one,
λ y hy, norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le hy⟩)⟩
lemma tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero {f : γ → β} {a : filter γ} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 0) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ∥f e∥) a (𝓝 0) :=
by { rw [tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero], simp only [sub_zero] }
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a real
function `g` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`.
In this pair of lemmas (`squeeze_zero_norm'` and `squeeze_zero_norm`), following a convention of
similar lemmas in `topology.metric_space.basic` and `topology.algebra.ordered`, the `'` version is
phrased using "eventually" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely. -/
lemma squeeze_zero_norm' {f : γ → α} {g : γ → ℝ} {t₀ : filter γ}
(h : ∀ᶠ n in t₀, ∥f n∥ ≤ g n)
(h' : tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) : tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mpr
(squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall (λ n, norm_nonneg _)) h h')
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `g` which
tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`. -/
lemma squeeze_zero_norm {f : γ → α} {g : γ → ℝ} {t₀ : filter γ}
(h : ∀ (n:γ), ∥f n∥ ≤ g n)
(h' : tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) :
tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
squeeze_zero_norm' (eventually_of_forall h) h'
lemma tendsto_norm_sub_self (x : α) : tendsto (λ g : α, ∥g - x∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ g, (x:α)) (𝓝 x) _)
lemma tendsto_norm {x : α} : tendsto (λg : α, ∥g∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 ∥x∥) :=
by simpa using tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ g, (0:α)) _ _)
lemma tendsto_norm_zero : tendsto (λg : α, ∥g∥) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa using tendsto_norm_sub_self (0:α)
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_norm : continuous (λg:α, ∥g∥) :=
by simpa using continuous_id.dist (continuous_const : continuous (λ g, (0:α)))
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_nnnorm : continuous (λ (a : α), ∥a∥₊) :=
continuous_subtype_mk _ continuous_norm
lemma lipschitz_with_one_norm : lipschitz_with 1 (norm : α → ℝ) :=
by simpa only [dist_zero_left] using lipschitz_with.dist_right (0 : α)
lemma uniform_continuous_norm : uniform_continuous (norm : α → ℝ) :=
lipschitz_with_one_norm.uniform_continuous
lemma uniform_continuous_nnnorm : uniform_continuous (λ (a : α), ∥a∥₊) :=
uniform_continuous_subtype_mk uniform_continuous_norm _
section
variables {l : filter γ} {f : γ → α} {a : α}
lemma filter.tendsto.norm {a : α} (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : tendsto (λ x, ∥f x∥) l (𝓝 ∥a∥) :=
tendsto_norm.comp h
lemma filter.tendsto.nnnorm (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λ x, ∥f x∥₊) l (𝓝 (∥a∥₊)) :=
tendsto.comp continuous_nnnorm.continuous_at h
end
section
variables [topological_space γ] {f : γ → α} {s : set γ} {a : γ} {b : α}
lemma continuous.norm (h : continuous f) : continuous (λ x, ∥f x∥) := continuous_norm.comp h
lemma continuous.nnnorm (h : continuous f) : continuous (λ x, ∥f x∥₊) :=
continuous_nnnorm.comp h
lemma continuous_at.norm (h : continuous_at f a) : continuous_at (λ x, ∥f x∥) a := h.norm
lemma continuous_at.nnnorm (h : continuous_at f a) : continuous_at (λ x, ∥f x∥₊) a := h.nnnorm
lemma continuous_within_at.norm (h : continuous_within_at f s a) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, ∥f x∥) s a :=
h.norm
lemma continuous_within_at.nnnorm (h : continuous_within_at f s a) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, ∥f x∥₊) s a :=
h.nnnorm
lemma continuous_on.norm (h : continuous_on f s) : continuous_on (λ x, ∥f x∥) s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).norm
lemma continuous_on.nnnorm (h : continuous_on f s) : continuous_on (λ x, ∥f x∥₊) s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).nnnorm
end
/-- If `∥y∥→∞`, then we can assume `y≠x` for any fixed `x`. -/
lemma eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top {l : filter γ} {f : γ → α}
(h : tendsto (λ y, ∥f y∥) l at_top) (x : α) :
∀ᶠ y in l, f y ≠ x :=
begin
have : ∀ᶠ y in l, 1 + ∥x∥ ≤ ∥f y∥ := h (mem_at_top (1 + ∥x∥)),
refine this.mono (λ y hy hxy, _),
subst x,
exact not_le_of_lt zero_lt_one (add_le_iff_nonpos_left.1 hy)
end
/-- A seminormed group is a uniform additive group, i.e., addition and subtraction are uniformly
continuous. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_uniform_group : uniform_add_group α :=
⟨(lipschitz_with.prod_fst.sub lipschitz_with.prod_snd).uniform_continuous⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_top_monoid : has_continuous_add α :=
by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_top_group : topological_add_group α :=
by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
lemma nat.norm_cast_le [has_one α] : ∀ n : ℕ, ∥(n : α)∥ ≤ n * ∥(1 : α)∥
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := by { rw [n.cast_succ, n.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul],
exact norm_add_le_of_le (nat.norm_cast_le n) le_rfl }
lemma semi_normed_group.mem_closure_iff {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ y ∈ s, ∥x - y∥ < ε :=
by simp [metric.mem_closure_iff, dist_eq_norm]
lemma norm_le_zero_iff' [separated_space α] {g : α} :
∥g∥ ≤ 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
begin
have : g = 0 ↔ g ∈ closure ({0} : set α),
by simpa only [separated_space.out, mem_id_rel, sub_zero] using group_separation_rel g (0 : α),
rw [this, semi_normed_group.mem_closure_iff],
simp [forall_lt_iff_le']
end
lemma norm_eq_zero_iff' [separated_space α] {g : α} : ∥g∥ = 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw ← norm_le_zero_iff' },
split ; intro h,
{ rw h },
{ exact le_antisymm h (norm_nonneg g) }
end
lemma norm_pos_iff' [separated_space α] {g : α} : 0 < ∥g∥ ↔ g ≠ 0 :=
begin
rw lt_iff_le_and_ne,
simp only [norm_nonneg, true_and],
rw [ne_comm],
exact not_iff_not_of_iff (norm_eq_zero_iff'),
end
end semi_normed_group
section normed_group
/-- Construct a normed group from a translation invariant distance -/
def normed_group.of_add_dist [has_norm α] [add_comm_group α] [metric_space α]
(H1 : ∀ x:α, ∥x∥ = dist x 0)
(H2 : ∀ x y z : α, dist x y ≤ dist (x + z) (y + z)) : normed_group α :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw H1, apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_right_neg y], apply H2 },
{ have := H2 (x-y) 0 y, rwa [sub_add_cancel, zero_add] at this }
end }
/-- A normed group can be built from a norm that satisfies algebraic properties. This is
formalised in this structure. -/
structure normed_group.core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α] : Prop :=
(norm_eq_zero_iff : ∀ x : α, ∥x∥ = 0 ↔ x = 0)
(triangle : ∀ x y : α, ∥x + y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ + ∥y∥)
(norm_neg : ∀ x : α, ∥-x∥ = ∥x∥)
/-- The `semi_normed_group.core` induced by a `normed_group.core`. -/
lemma normed_group.core.to_semi_normed_group.core {α : Type*} [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α]
(C : normed_group.core α) : semi_normed_group.core α :=
{ norm_zero := (C.norm_eq_zero_iff 0).2 rfl,
triangle := C.triangle,
norm_neg := C.norm_neg }
/-- Constructing a normed group from core properties of a norm, i.e., registering the distance and
the metric space structure from the norm properties. -/
noncomputable def normed_group.of_core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α]
(C : normed_group.core α) : normed_group α :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λ x y h,
begin
rw [dist_eq_norm] at h,
exact sub_eq_zero.mp ((C.norm_eq_zero_iff _).1 h)
end
..semi_normed_group.of_core α (normed_group.core.to_semi_normed_group.core C) }
variables [normed_group α] [normed_group β]
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_zero {g : α} : ∥g∥ = 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
dist_zero_right g ▸ dist_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma norm_pos_iff {g : α} : 0 < ∥ g ∥ ↔ g ≠ 0 :=
dist_zero_right g ▸ dist_pos
@[simp] lemma norm_le_zero_iff {g : α} : ∥g∥ ≤ 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
by { rw [← dist_zero_right], exact dist_le_zero }
lemma eq_of_norm_sub_le_zero {g h : α} (a : ∥g - h∥ ≤ 0) : g = h :=
by rwa [← sub_eq_zero, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
lemma eq_of_norm_sub_eq_zero {u v : α} (h : ∥u - v∥ = 0) : u = v :=
begin
apply eq_of_dist_eq_zero,
rwa dist_eq_norm
end
lemma norm_sub_eq_zero_iff {u v : α} : ∥u - v∥ = 0 ↔ u = v :=
begin
convert dist_eq_zero,
rwa dist_eq_norm
end
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq_zero {a : α} : ∥a∥₊ = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simp only [nnreal.eq_iff.symm, nnreal.coe_zero, coe_nnnorm, norm_eq_zero]
/-- A subgroup of a normed group is also a normed group, with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance add_subgroup.normed_group {E : Type*} [normed_group E] (s : add_subgroup E) :
normed_group s :=
{ ..add_subgroup.semi_normed_group s }
/-- A submodule of a normed group is also a normed group, with the restriction of the norm.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
instance submodule.normed_group {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} (s : submodule 𝕜 E) : normed_group s :=
{ ..submodule.semi_normed_group s }
/-- normed group instance on the product of two normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.normed_group : normed_group (α × β) := { ..prod.semi_normed_group }
lemma prod.norm_def (x : α × β) : ∥x∥ = (max ∥x.1∥ ∥x.2∥) := rfl
lemma prod.nnnorm_def (x : α × β) : ∥x∥₊ = max (∥x.1∥₊) (∥x.2∥₊) :=
by { have := x.norm_def, simp only [← coe_nnnorm] at this, exact_mod_cast this }
lemma norm_fst_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.1∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_left _ _
lemma norm_snd_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.2∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_right _ _
lemma norm_prod_le_iff {x : α × β} {r : ℝ} :
∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∥x.1∥ ≤ r ∧ ∥x.2∥ ≤ r :=
max_le_iff
/-- normed group instance on the product of finitely many normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
instance pi.normed_group {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] :
normed_group (Πi, π i) := { ..pi.semi_normed_group }
/-- The norm of an element in a product space is `≤ r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
lemma pi_norm_le_iff {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r)
{x : Πi, π i} : ∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∀i, ∥x i∥ ≤ r :=
by simp only [← dist_zero_right, dist_pi_le_iff hr, pi.zero_apply]
/-- The norm of an element in a product space is `< r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
lemma pi_norm_lt_iff {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r)
{x : Πi, π i} : ∥x∥ < r ↔ ∀i, ∥x i∥ < r :=
by simp only [← dist_zero_right, dist_pi_lt_iff hr, pi.zero_apply]
lemma norm_le_pi_norm {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] (x : Πi, π i) (i : ι) :
∥x i∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
(pi_norm_le_iff (norm_nonneg x)).1 (le_refl _) i
@[simp] lemma pi_norm_const [nonempty ι] [fintype ι] (a : α) : ∥(λ i : ι, a)∥ = ∥a∥ :=
by simpa only [← dist_zero_right] using dist_pi_const a 0
@[simp] lemma pi_nnnorm_const [nonempty ι] [fintype ι] (a : α) :
∥(λ i : ι, a)∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ pi_norm_const a
lemma tendsto_norm_nhds_within_zero : tendsto (norm : α → ℝ) (𝓝[{0}ᶜ] 0) (𝓝[set.Ioi 0] 0) :=
(continuous_norm.tendsto' (0 : α) 0 norm_zero).inf $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $
λ x, norm_pos_iff.2
end normed_group
section semi_normed_ring
/-- A seminormed ring is a ring endowed with a seminorm which satisfies the inequality
`∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class semi_normed_ring (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, ring α, pseudo_metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) ≤ norm a * norm b)
/-- A normed ring is a ring endowed with a norm which satisfies the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class normed_ring (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, ring α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) ≤ norm a * norm b)
/-- A normed ring is a seminormed ring. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_ring.to_semi_normed_ring [β : normed_ring α] : semi_normed_ring α :=
{ ..β }
/-- A seminormed commutative ring is a commutative ring endowed with a seminorm which satisfies
the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class semi_normed_comm_ring (α : Type*) extends semi_normed_ring α :=
(mul_comm : ∀ x y : α, x * y = y * x)
/-- A normed commutative ring is a commutative ring endowed with a norm which satisfies
the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class normed_comm_ring (α : Type*) extends normed_ring α :=
(mul_comm : ∀ x y : α, x * y = y * x)
/-- A normed commutative ring is a seminormed commutative ring. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_comm_ring.to_semi_normed_comm_ring [β : normed_comm_ring α] :
semi_normed_comm_ring α := { ..β }
instance : normed_comm_ring punit :=
{ norm_mul := λ _ _, by simp,
..punit.normed_group,
..punit.comm_ring, }
/-- A mixin class with the axiom `∥1∥ = 1`. Many `normed_ring`s and all `normed_field`s satisfy this
axiom. -/
class norm_one_class (α : Type*) [has_norm α] [has_one α] : Prop :=
(norm_one : ∥(1:α)∥ = 1)
export norm_one_class (norm_one)
attribute [simp] norm_one
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_one [semi_normed_group α] [has_one α] [norm_one_class α] : ∥(1 : α)∥₊ = 1 :=
nnreal.eq norm_one
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_comm_ring.to_comm_ring [β : semi_normed_comm_ring α] : comm_ring α := { ..β }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_ring.to_normed_group [β : normed_ring α] : normed_group α := { ..β }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_ring.to_semi_normed_group [β : semi_normed_ring α] :
semi_normed_group α := { ..β }
instance prod.norm_one_class [normed_group α] [has_one α] [norm_one_class α]
[normed_group β] [has_one β] [norm_one_class β] :
norm_one_class (α × β) :=
⟨by simp [prod.norm_def]⟩
variables [semi_normed_ring α]
lemma norm_mul_le (a b : α) : (∥a*b∥) ≤ (∥a∥) * (∥b∥) :=
semi_normed_ring.norm_mul _ _
/-- A subalgebra of a seminormed ring is also a seminormed ring, with the restriction of the norm.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
instance subalgebra.semi_normed_ring {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : comm_ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_ring E] {_ : algebra 𝕜 E} (s : subalgebra 𝕜 E) : semi_normed_ring s :=
{ norm_mul := λ a b, norm_mul_le a.1 b.1,
..s.to_submodule.semi_normed_group }
/-- A subalgebra of a normed ring is also a normed ring, with the restriction of the norm.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
instance subalgebra.normed_ring {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : comm_ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [normed_ring E] {_ : algebra 𝕜 E} (s : subalgebra 𝕜 E) : normed_ring s :=
{ ..s.semi_normed_ring }
lemma list.norm_prod_le' : ∀ {l : list α}, l ≠ [] → ∥l.prod∥ ≤ (l.map norm).prod
| [] h := (h rfl).elim
| [a] _ := by simp
| (a :: b :: l) _ :=
begin
rw [list.map_cons, list.prod_cons, @list.prod_cons _ _ _ ∥a∥],
refine le_trans (norm_mul_le _ _) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _)),
exact list.norm_prod_le' (list.cons_ne_nil b l)
end
lemma list.norm_prod_le [norm_one_class α] : ∀ l : list α, ∥l.prod∥ ≤ (l.map norm).prod
| [] := by simp
| (a::l) := list.norm_prod_le' (list.cons_ne_nil a l)
lemma finset.norm_prod_le' {α : Type*} [normed_comm_ring α] (s : finset ι) (hs : s.nonempty)
(f : ι → α) :
∥∏ i in s, f i∥ ≤ ∏ i in s, ∥f i∥ :=
begin
rcases s with ⟨⟨l⟩, hl⟩,
have : l.map f ≠ [], by simpa using hs,
simpa using list.norm_prod_le' this
end
lemma finset.norm_prod_le {α : Type*} [normed_comm_ring α] [norm_one_class α] (s : finset ι)
(f : ι → α) :
∥∏ i in s, f i∥ ≤ ∏ i in s, ∥f i∥ :=
begin
rcases s with ⟨⟨l⟩, hl⟩,
simpa using (l.map f).norm_prod_le
end
/-- If `α` is a seminormed ring, then `∥a^n∥≤ ∥a∥^n` for `n > 0`. See also `norm_pow_le`. -/
lemma norm_pow_le' (a : α) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → ∥a^n∥ ≤ ∥a∥^n
| 1 h := by simp
| (n+2) h := by { rw [pow_succ _ (n+1), pow_succ _ (n+1)],
exact le_trans (norm_mul_le a (a^(n+1)))
(mul_le_mul (le_refl _)
(norm_pow_le' (nat.succ_pos _)) (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) }
/-- If `α` is a seminormed ring with `∥1∥=1`, then `∥a^n∥≤ ∥a∥^n`. See also `norm_pow_le'`. -/
lemma norm_pow_le [norm_one_class α] (a : α) : ∀ (n : ℕ), ∥a^n∥ ≤ ∥a∥^n
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := norm_pow_le' a n.zero_lt_succ
lemma eventually_norm_pow_le (a : α) : ∀ᶠ (n:ℕ) in at_top, ∥a ^ n∥ ≤ ∥a∥ ^ n :=
eventually_at_top.mpr ⟨1, λ b h, norm_pow_le' a (nat.succ_le_iff.mp h)⟩
/-- In a seminormed ring, the left-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is bounded. -/
lemma mul_left_bound (x : α) :
∀ (y:α), ∥add_monoid_hom.mul_left x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
norm_mul_le x
/-- In a seminormed ring, the right-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is bounded. -/
lemma mul_right_bound (x : α) :
∀ (y:α), ∥add_monoid_hom.mul_right x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
λ y, by {rw mul_comm, convert norm_mul_le y x}
/-- Seminormed ring structure on the product of two seminormed rings, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.semi_normed_ring [semi_normed_ring β] : semi_normed_ring (α × β) :=
{ norm_mul := assume x y,
calc
∥x * y∥ = ∥(x.1*y.1, x.2*y.2)∥ : rfl
... = (max ∥x.1*y.1∥ ∥x.2*y.2∥) : rfl
... ≤ (max (∥x.1∥*∥y.1∥) (∥x.2∥*∥y.2∥)) :
max_le_max (norm_mul_le (x.1) (y.1)) (norm_mul_le (x.2) (y.2))
... = (max (∥x.1∥*∥y.1∥) (∥y.2∥*∥x.2∥)) : by simp[mul_comm]
... ≤ (max (∥x.1∥) (∥x.2∥)) * (max (∥y.2∥) (∥y.1∥)) :
by apply max_mul_mul_le_max_mul_max; simp [norm_nonneg]
... = (max (∥x.1∥) (∥x.2∥)) * (max (∥y.1∥) (∥y.2∥)) : by simp [max_comm]
... = (∥x∥*∥y∥) : rfl,
..prod.semi_normed_group }
end semi_normed_ring
section normed_ring
variables [normed_ring α]
lemma units.norm_pos [nontrivial α] (x : units α) : 0 < ∥(x:α)∥ :=
norm_pos_iff.mpr (units.ne_zero x)
/-- Normed ring structure on the product of two normed rings, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.normed_ring [normed_ring β] : normed_ring (α × β) :=
{ norm_mul := norm_mul_le,
..prod.semi_normed_group }
end normed_ring
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_ring_top_monoid [semi_normed_ring α] : has_continuous_mul α :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 $
begin
have : ∀ e : α × α, ∥e.1 * e.2 - x.1 * x.2∥ ≤ ∥e.1∥ * ∥e.2 - x.2∥ + ∥e.1 - x.1∥ * ∥x.2∥,
{ intro e,
calc ∥e.1 * e.2 - x.1 * x.2∥ ≤ ∥e.1 * (e.2 - x.2) + (e.1 - x.1) * x.2∥ :
by rw [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel]
... ≤ ∥e.1∥ * ∥e.2 - x.2∥ + ∥e.1 - x.1∥ * ∥x.2∥ :
norm_add_le_of_le (norm_mul_le _ _) (norm_mul_le _ _) },
refine squeeze_zero (λ e, norm_nonneg _) this _,
convert ((continuous_fst.tendsto x).norm.mul ((continuous_snd.tendsto x).sub
tendsto_const_nhds).norm).add
(((continuous_fst.tendsto x).sub tendsto_const_nhds).norm.mul _),
show tendsto _ _ _, from tendsto_const_nhds,
simp
end ⟩
/-- A seminormed ring is a topological ring. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_top_ring [semi_normed_ring α] : topological_ring α :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 $
have ∀ e : α, -e - -x = -(e - x), by intro; simp,
by simp only [this, norm_neg]; apply tendsto_norm_sub_self ⟩
/-- A normed field is a field with a norm satisfying ∥x y∥ = ∥x∥ ∥y∥. -/
class normed_field (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, field α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul' : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) = norm a * norm b)
/-- A nondiscrete normed field is a normed field in which there is an element of norm different from
`0` and `1`. This makes it possible to bring any element arbitrarily close to `0` by multiplication
by the powers of any element, and thus to relate algebra and topology. -/
class nondiscrete_normed_field (α : Type*) extends normed_field α :=
(non_trivial : ∃x:α, 1<∥x∥)
namespace normed_field
section normed_field
variables [normed_field α]
@[simp] lemma norm_mul (a b : α) : ∥a * b∥ = ∥a∥ * ∥b∥ :=
normed_field.norm_mul' a b
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance to_normed_comm_ring : normed_comm_ring α :=
{ norm_mul := λ a b, (norm_mul a b).le, ..‹normed_field α› }
@[priority 900]
instance to_norm_one_class : norm_one_class α :=
⟨mul_left_cancel' (mt norm_eq_zero.1 (@one_ne_zero α _ _)) $
by rw [← norm_mul, mul_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_mul (a b : α) : ∥a * b∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ * ∥b∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_mul a b
/-- `norm` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps] def norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ := ⟨norm, norm_zero, norm_one, norm_mul⟩
/-- `nnnorm` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps] def nnnorm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ≥0 :=
⟨nnnorm, nnnorm_zero, nnnorm_one, nnnorm_mul⟩
@[simp] lemma norm_pow (a : α) : ∀ (n : ℕ), ∥a ^ n∥ = ∥a∥ ^ n :=
(norm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ).map_pow a
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ∥a ^ n∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ ^ n :=
(nnnorm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ≥0).map_pow a n
@[simp] lemma norm_prod (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∥∏ b in s, f b∥ = ∏ b in s, ∥f b∥ :=
(norm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ).map_prod f s
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_prod (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∥∏ b in s, f b∥₊ = ∏ b in s, ∥f b∥₊ :=
(nnnorm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ≥0).map_prod f s
@[simp] lemma norm_div (a b : α) : ∥a / b∥ = ∥a∥ / ∥b∥ :=
(norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ).map_div a b
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_div (a b : α) : ∥a / b∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ / ∥b∥₊ :=
(nnnorm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ≥0).map_div a b
@[simp] lemma norm_inv (a : α) : ∥a⁻¹∥ = ∥a∥⁻¹ :=
(norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ).map_inv' a
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_inv (a : α) : ∥a⁻¹∥₊ = ∥a∥₊⁻¹ :=
nnreal.eq $ by simp
@[simp] lemma norm_fpow : ∀ (a : α) (n : ℤ), ∥a^n∥ = ∥a∥^n :=
(norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ).map_fpow
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_fpow : ∀ (a : α) (n : ℤ), ∥a ^ n∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ ^ n :=
(nnnorm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ≥0).map_fpow
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance : has_continuous_inv' α :=
begin
refine ⟨λ r r0, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 _⟩,
have r0' : 0 < ∥r∥ := norm_pos_iff.2 r0,
rcases exists_between r0' with ⟨ε, ε0, εr⟩,
have : ∀ᶠ e in 𝓝 r, ∥e⁻¹ - r⁻¹∥ ≤ ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ε,
{ filter_upwards [(is_open_lt continuous_const continuous_norm).eventually_mem εr],
intros e he,
have e0 : e ≠ 0 := norm_pos_iff.1 (ε0.trans he),
calc ∥e⁻¹ - r⁻¹∥ = ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ∥e∥ : by field_simp [mul_comm]
... ≤ ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ε :
div_le_div_of_le_left (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) ε0 he.le },
refine squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall $ λ _, norm_nonneg _) this _,
refine (continuous_const.sub continuous_id).norm.div_const.div_const.tendsto' _ _ _,
simp
end
end normed_field
variables (α) [nondiscrete_normed_field α]
lemma exists_one_lt_norm : ∃x : α, 1 < ∥x∥ := ‹nondiscrete_normed_field α›.non_trivial
lemma exists_norm_lt_one : ∃x : α, 0 < ∥x∥ ∧ ∥x∥ < 1 :=
begin
rcases exists_one_lt_norm α with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine ⟨y⁻¹, _, _⟩,
{ simp only [inv_eq_zero, ne.def, norm_pos_iff],
rintro rfl,
rw norm_zero at hy,
exact lt_asymm zero_lt_one hy },
{ simp [inv_lt_one hy] }
end
lemma exists_lt_norm (r : ℝ) : ∃ x : α, r < ∥x∥ :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm α in
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := pow_unbounded_of_one_lt r hw in
⟨w^n, by rwa norm_pow⟩
lemma exists_norm_lt {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : ∃ x : α, 0 < ∥x∥ ∧ ∥x∥ < r :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm α in
let ⟨n, hle, hlt⟩ := exists_int_pow_near' hr hw in
⟨w^n, by { rw norm_fpow; exact fpow_pos_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hw) _},
by rwa norm_fpow⟩
variable {α}
@[instance]
lemma punctured_nhds_ne_bot (x : α) : ne_bot (𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x) :=
begin
rw [← mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot, metric.mem_closure_iff],
rintros ε ε0,
rcases normed_field.exists_norm_lt α ε0 with ⟨b, hb0, hbε⟩,
refine ⟨x + b, mt (set.mem_singleton_iff.trans add_right_eq_self).1 $ norm_pos_iff.1 hb0, _⟩,
rwa [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel'],
end
@[instance]
lemma nhds_within_is_unit_ne_bot : ne_bot (𝓝[{x : α | is_unit x}] 0) :=
by simpa only [is_unit_iff_ne_zero] using punctured_nhds_ne_bot (0:α)
end normed_field
instance : normed_field ℝ :=
{ norm_mul' := abs_mul,
.. real.normed_group }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℝ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by { unfold norm, rw abs_of_nonneg; norm_num }⟩ }
namespace real
lemma norm_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ∥x∥ = x :=
abs_of_nonneg hx
@[simp] lemma norm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ∥(n : ℝ)∥ = n := abs_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ∥(n : ℝ)∥₊ = n := nnreal.eq $ by simp
@[simp] lemma norm_two : ∥(2 : ℝ)∥ = 2 := abs_of_pos (@zero_lt_two ℝ _ _)
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_two : ∥(2 : ℝ)∥₊ = 2 := nnreal.eq $ by simp
lemma nnnorm_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ∥x∥₊ = ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_of_nonneg hx
lemma ennnorm_eq_of_real {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (∥x∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = ennreal.of_real x :=
by { rw [← of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, norm_of_nonneg hx] }
end real
namespace nnreal
open_locale nnreal
@[simp] lemma norm_eq (x : ℝ≥0) : ∥(x : ℝ)∥ = x :=
by rw [real.norm_eq_abs, x.abs_eq]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq (x : ℝ≥0) : ∥(x : ℝ)∥₊ = x :=
nnreal.eq $ real.norm_of_nonneg x.2
end nnreal
@[simp] lemma norm_norm [semi_normed_group α] (x : α) : ∥∥x∥∥ = ∥x∥ :=
real.norm_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _)
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_norm [semi_normed_group α] (a : α) : ∥∥a∥∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ :=
by simpa [real.nnnorm_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a)]
/-- A restatement of `metric_space.tendsto_at_top` in terms of the norm. -/
lemma normed_group.tendsto_at_top [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] {β : Type*} [semi_normed_group β]
{f : α → β} {b : β} :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → ∥f n - b∥ < ε :=
(at_top_basis.tendsto_iff metric.nhds_basis_ball).trans (by simp [dist_eq_norm])
/--
A variant of `normed_group.tendsto_at_top` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
lemma normed_group.tendsto_at_top' [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [no_top_order α]
{β : Type*} [semi_normed_group β]
{f : α → β} {b : β} :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N < n → ∥f n - b∥ < ε :=
(at_top_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff metric.nhds_basis_ball).trans (by simp [dist_eq_norm])
instance : normed_comm_ring ℤ :=
{ norm := λ n, ∥(n : ℝ)∥,
norm_mul := λ m n, le_of_eq $ by simp only [norm, int.cast_mul, abs_mul],
dist_eq := λ m n, by simp only [int.dist_eq, norm, int.cast_sub],
mul_comm := mul_comm }
@[norm_cast] lemma int.norm_cast_real (m : ℤ) : ∥(m : ℝ)∥ = ∥m∥ := rfl
lemma int.norm_eq_abs (n : ℤ) : ∥n∥ = abs n := rfl
lemma nnreal.coe_nat_abs (n : ℤ) : (n.nat_abs : ℝ≥0) = ∥n∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ calc ((n.nat_abs : ℝ≥0) : ℝ)
= (n.nat_abs : ℤ) : by simp only [int.cast_coe_nat, nnreal.coe_nat_cast]
... = abs n : by simp only [← int.abs_eq_nat_abs, int.cast_abs]
... = ∥n∥ : rfl
instance : norm_one_class ℤ :=
⟨by simp [← int.norm_cast_real]⟩
instance : normed_field ℚ :=
{ norm := λ r, ∥(r : ℝ)∥,
norm_mul' := λ r₁ r₂, by simp only [norm, rat.cast_mul, abs_mul],
dist_eq := λ r₁ r₂, by simp only [rat.dist_eq, norm, rat.cast_sub] }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℚ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by { unfold norm, rw abs_of_nonneg; norm_num }⟩ }
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma rat.norm_cast_real (r : ℚ) : ∥(r : ℝ)∥ = ∥r∥ := rfl
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma int.norm_cast_rat (m : ℤ) : ∥(m : ℚ)∥ = ∥m∥ :=
by rw [← rat.norm_cast_real, ← int.norm_cast_real]; congr' 1; norm_cast
-- Now that we've installed the norm on `ℤ`,
-- we can state some lemmas about `nsmul` and `gsmul`.
section
variables [semi_normed_group α]
lemma norm_nsmul_le (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥ ≤ n * ∥a∥ :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ simp only [norm_zero, nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul] },
simp only [nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_smul, add_mul, one_mul, nat.cast_add,
nat.cast_one, one_nsmul],
exact norm_add_le_of_le ih le_rfl
end
lemma norm_gsmul_le (n : ℤ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥ ≤ ∥n∥ * ∥a∥ :=
begin
induction n with n n,
{ simp only [int.of_nat_eq_coe, gsmul_coe_nat],
convert norm_nsmul_le n a,
exact nat.abs_cast n },
{ simp only [int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe, neg_smul, norm_neg, gsmul_coe_nat],
convert norm_nsmul_le n.succ a,
exact nat.abs_cast n.succ, }
end
lemma nnnorm_nsmul_le (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥₊ ≤ n * ∥a∥₊ :=
by simpa only [←nnreal.coe_le_coe, nnreal.coe_mul, nnreal.coe_nat_cast]
using norm_nsmul_le n a
lemma nnnorm_gsmul_le (n : ℤ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥₊ ≤ ∥n∥₊ * ∥a∥₊ :=
by simpa only [←nnreal.coe_le_coe, nnreal.coe_mul] using norm_gsmul_le n a
end
section semi_normed_space
section prio
set_option extends_priority 920
-- Here, we set a rather high priority for the instance `[semi_normed_space α β] : module α β`
-- to take precedence over `semiring.to_module` as this leads to instance paths with better
-- unification properties.
/-- A seminormed space over a normed field is a vector space endowed with a seminorm which satisfies
the equality `∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥`. We require only `∥c • x∥ ≤ ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in the definition, then prove
`∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in `norm_smul`. -/
class semi_normed_space (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [normed_field α] [semi_normed_group β]
extends module α β :=
(norm_smul_le : ∀ (a:α) (b:β), ∥a • b∥ ≤ ∥a∥ * ∥b∥)
set_option extends_priority 920
-- Here, we set a rather high priority for the instance `[normed_space α β] : module α β`
-- to take precedence over `semiring.to_module` as this leads to instance paths with better
-- unification properties.
/-- A normed space over a normed field is a vector space endowed with a norm which satisfies the
equality `∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥`. We require only `∥c • x∥ ≤ ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in the definition, then prove
`∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in `norm_smul`. -/
class normed_space (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [normed_field α] [normed_group β]
extends module α β :=
(norm_smul_le : ∀ (a:α) (b:β), ∥a • b∥ ≤ ∥a∥ * ∥b∥)
/-- A normed space is a seminormed space. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_space.to_semi_normed_space [normed_field α] [normed_group β]
[γ : normed_space α β] : semi_normed_space α β := { ..γ }
end prio
variables [normed_field α] [semi_normed_group β]
instance normed_field.to_normed_space : normed_space α α :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ a b, le_of_eq (normed_field.norm_mul a b) }
lemma norm_smul [semi_normed_space α β] (s : α) (x : β) : ∥s • x∥ = ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ :=
begin
by_cases h : s = 0,
{ simp [h] },
{ refine le_antisymm (semi_normed_space.norm_smul_le s x) _,
calc ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ = ∥s∥ * ∥s⁻¹ • s • x∥ : by rw [inv_smul_smul' h]
... ≤ ∥s∥ * (∥s⁻¹∥ * ∥s • x∥) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (semi_normed_space.norm_smul_le _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
... = ∥s • x∥ :
by rw [normed_field.norm_inv, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel (mt norm_eq_zero.1 h), one_mul] }
end
@[simp] lemma abs_norm_eq_norm (z : β) : abs ∥z∥ = ∥z∥ :=
(abs_eq (norm_nonneg z)).mpr (or.inl rfl)
lemma dist_smul [semi_normed_space α β] (s : α) (x y : β) : dist (s • x) (s • y) = ∥s∥ * dist x y :=
by simp only [dist_eq_norm, (norm_smul _ _).symm, smul_sub]
lemma nnnorm_smul [semi_normed_space α β] (s : α) (x : β) : ∥s • x∥₊ = ∥s∥₊ * ∥x∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_smul s x
lemma nndist_smul [semi_normed_space α β] (s : α) (x y : β) :
nndist (s • x) (s • y) = ∥s∥₊ * nndist x y :=
nnreal.eq $ dist_smul s x y
lemma norm_smul_of_nonneg [semi_normed_space ℝ β] {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 ≤ t) (x : β) :
∥t • x∥ = t * ∥x∥ := by rw [norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ht]
variables {E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] [semi_normed_space α E]
variables {F : Type*} [semi_normed_group F] [semi_normed_space α F]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_space.has_continuous_smul : has_continuous_smul α E :=
begin
refine { continuous_smul := continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $
λ p, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 _ },
refine squeeze_zero (λ _, norm_nonneg _) _ _,
{ exact λ q, ∥q.1 - p.1∥ * ∥q.2∥ + ∥p.1∥ * ∥q.2 - p.2∥ },
{ intro q,
rw [← sub_add_sub_cancel, ← norm_smul, ← norm_smul, smul_sub, sub_smul],
exact norm_add_le _ _ },
{ conv { congr, skip, skip, congr, rw [← zero_add (0:ℝ)], congr,
rw [← zero_mul ∥p.2∥], skip, rw [← mul_zero ∥p.1∥] },
exact ((tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1 (continuous_fst.tendsto p)).mul
(continuous_snd.tendsto p).norm).add
(tendsto_const_nhds.mul (tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1 (continuous_snd.tendsto p))) }
end
theorem eventually_nhds_norm_smul_sub_lt (c : α) (x : E) {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 < ε) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, ∥c • (y - x)∥ < ε :=
have tendsto (λ y, ∥c • (y - x)∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0),
from (continuous_const.smul (continuous_id.sub continuous_const)).norm.tendsto' _ _ (by simp),
this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds h)
theorem closure_ball [semi_normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
closure (ball x r) = closed_ball x r :=
begin
refine set.subset.antisymm closure_ball_subset_closed_ball (λ y hy, _),
have : continuous_within_at (λ c : ℝ, c • (y - x) + x) (set.Ico 0 1) 1 :=
((continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const).continuous_within_at,
convert this.mem_closure _ _,
{ rw [one_smul, sub_add_cancel] },
{ simp [closure_Ico (@zero_lt_one ℝ _ _), zero_le_one] },
{ rintros c ⟨hc0, hc1⟩,
rw [set.mem_preimage, mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel, norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_nonneg hc0, mul_comm, ← mul_one r],
rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm] at hy,
apply mul_lt_mul'; assumption }
end
theorem frontier_ball [semi_normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
frontier (ball x r) = sphere x r :=
begin
rw [frontier, closure_ball x hr, is_open_ball.interior_eq],
ext x, exact (@eq_iff_le_not_lt ℝ _ _ _).symm
end
theorem interior_closed_ball [semi_normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
interior (closed_ball x r) = ball x r :=
begin
refine set.subset.antisymm _ ball_subset_interior_closed_ball,
intros y hy,
rcases le_iff_lt_or_eq.1 (mem_closed_ball.1 $ interior_subset hy) with hr|rfl, { exact hr },
set f : ℝ → E := λ c : ℝ, c • (y - x) + x,
suffices : f ⁻¹' closed_ball x (dist y x) ⊆ set.Icc (-1) 1,
{ have hfc : continuous f := (continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const,
have hf1 : (1:ℝ) ∈ f ⁻¹' (interior (closed_ball x $ dist y x)), by simpa [f],
have h1 : (1:ℝ) ∈ interior (set.Icc (-1:ℝ) 1) :=
interior_mono this (preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage hfc hf1),
contrapose h1,
simp },
intros c hc,
rw [set.mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_le_mul_right hr],
simpa [f, dist_eq_norm, norm_smul] using hc
end
theorem frontier_closed_ball [semi_normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
frontier (closed_ball x r) = sphere x r :=
by rw [frontier, closure_closed_ball, interior_closed_ball x hr,
closed_ball_diff_ball]
variables (α)
lemma ne_neg_of_mem_sphere [char_zero α] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : sphere (0:E) r) : x ≠ - x :=
λ h, nonzero_of_mem_sphere hr x (eq_zero_of_eq_neg α (by { conv_lhs {rw h}, simp }))
lemma ne_neg_of_mem_unit_sphere [char_zero α] (x : sphere (0:E) 1) : x ≠ - x :=
ne_neg_of_mem_sphere α (by norm_num) x
variables {α}
open normed_field
/-- The product of two seminormed spaces is a seminormed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance prod.semi_normed_space : semi_normed_space α (E × F) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ s x, le_of_eq $ by simp [prod.semi_norm_def, norm_smul, mul_max_of_nonneg],
..prod.normed_group,
..prod.module }
/-- The product of finitely many seminormed spaces is a seminormed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance pi.semi_normed_space {E : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, semi_normed_group (E i)]
[∀i, semi_normed_space α (E i)] : semi_normed_space α (Πi, E i) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ a f, le_of_eq $
show (↑(finset.sup finset.univ (λ (b : ι), ∥a • f b∥₊)) : ℝ) =
∥a∥₊ * ↑(finset.sup finset.univ (λ (b : ι), ∥f b∥₊)),
by simp only [(nnreal.coe_mul _ _).symm, nnreal.mul_finset_sup, nnnorm_smul] }
/-- A subspace of a seminormed space is also a normed space, with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance submodule.semi_normed_space {𝕜 R : Type*} [has_scalar 𝕜 R] [normed_field 𝕜] [ring R]
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] [semi_normed_space 𝕜 E] [module R E]
[is_scalar_tower 𝕜 R E] (s : submodule R E) :
semi_normed_space 𝕜 s :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ norm_smul c (x : E) }
/-- If there is a scalar `c` with `∥c∥>1`, then any element of with norm different from `0` can be
moved by scalar multiplication to any shell of width `∥c∥`. Also recap information on the norm of
the rescaling element that shows up in applications. -/
lemma rescale_to_shell_semi_normed {c : α} (hc : 1 < ∥c∥) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) {x : E}
(hx : ∥x∥ ≠ 0) : ∃d:α, d ≠ 0 ∧ ∥d • x∥ < ε ∧ (ε/∥c∥ ≤ ∥d • x∥) ∧ (∥d∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥) :=
begin
have xεpos : 0 < ∥x∥/ε := div_pos ((ne.symm hx).le_iff_lt.1 (norm_nonneg x)) εpos,
rcases exists_int_pow_near xεpos hc with ⟨n, hn⟩,
have cpos : 0 < ∥c∥ := lt_trans (zero_lt_one : (0 :ℝ) < 1) hc,
have cnpos : 0 < ∥c^(n+1)∥ := by { rw norm_fpow, exact lt_trans xεpos hn.2 },
refine ⟨(c^(n+1))⁻¹, _, _, _, _⟩,
show (c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ ≠ 0,
by rwa [ne.def, inv_eq_zero, ← ne.def, ← norm_pos_iff],
show ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ • x∥ < ε,
{ rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff cnpos, mul_comm, norm_fpow],
exact (div_lt_iff εpos).1 (hn.2) },
show ε / ∥c∥ ≤ ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ • x∥,
{ rw [div_le_iff cpos, norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_fpow, fpow_add (ne_of_gt cpos),
gpow_one, mul_inv_rev', mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_gt cpos),
one_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul, le_div_iff (fpow_pos_of_pos cpos _), mul_comm],
exact (le_div_iff εpos).1 hn.1 },
show ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
{ have : ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥ = ε⁻¹ * ∥x∥ * ∥c∥, by ring,
rw [norm_inv, inv_inv', norm_fpow, fpow_add (ne_of_gt cpos), gpow_one, this, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hn.1 (norm_nonneg _) }
end
end semi_normed_space
section normed_space
variables [normed_field α]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space α E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space α F]
open normed_field
theorem interior_closed_ball' [normed_space ℝ E] [nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
interior (closed_ball x r) = ball x r :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with hr|rfl|hr,
{ simp [closed_ball_eq_empty_iff_neg.2 hr, ball_eq_empty_iff_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt hr)] },
{ suffices : x ∉ interior {x},
{ rw [ball_zero, closed_ball_zero, ← set.subset_empty_iff],
intros y hy,
obtain rfl : y = x := set.mem_singleton_iff.1 (interior_subset hy),
exact this hy },
rw [← set.mem_compl_iff, ← closure_compl],
rcases exists_ne (0 : E) with ⟨z, hz⟩,
suffices : (λ c : ℝ, x + c • z) 0 ∈ closure ({x}ᶜ : set E),
by simpa only [zero_smul, add_zero] using this,
have : (0:ℝ) ∈ closure (set.Ioi (0:ℝ)), by simp [closure_Ioi],
refine (continuous_const.add (continuous_id.smul
continuous_const)).continuous_within_at.mem_closure this _,
intros c hc,
simp [smul_eq_zero, hz, ne_of_gt hc] },
{ exact interior_closed_ball x hr }
end
theorem frontier_closed_ball' [normed_space ℝ E] [nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
frontier (closed_ball x r) = sphere x r :=
by rw [frontier, closure_closed_ball, interior_closed_ball' x r, closed_ball_diff_ball]
variables {α}
/-- If there is a scalar `c` with `∥c∥>1`, then any element can be moved by scalar multiplication to
any shell of width `∥c∥`. Also recap information on the norm of the rescaling element that shows
up in applications. -/
lemma rescale_to_shell {c : α} (hc : 1 < ∥c∥) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃d:α, d ≠ 0 ∧ ∥d • x∥ < ε ∧ (ε/∥c∥ ≤ ∥d • x∥) ∧ (∥d∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥) :=
rescale_to_shell_semi_normed hc εpos (ne_of_lt (norm_pos_iff.2 hx)).symm
/-- The product of two normed spaces is a normed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance : normed_space α (E × F) := { ..prod.semi_normed_space }
/-- The product of finitely many normed spaces is a normed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance pi.normed_space {E : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (E i)]
[∀i, normed_space α (E i)] : normed_space α (Πi, E i) :=
{ ..pi.semi_normed_space }
/-- A subspace of a normed space is also a normed space, with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance submodule.normed_space {𝕜 R : Type*} [has_scalar 𝕜 R] [normed_field 𝕜] [ring R]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [module R E]
[is_scalar_tower 𝕜 R E] (s : submodule R E) :
normed_space 𝕜 s :=
{ ..submodule.semi_normed_space s }
end normed_space
section normed_algebra
/-- A seminormed algebra `𝕜'` over `𝕜` is an algebra endowed with a seminorm for which the
embedding of `𝕜` in `𝕜'` is an isometry. -/
class semi_normed_algebra (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [semi_normed_ring 𝕜']
extends algebra 𝕜 𝕜' :=
(norm_algebra_map_eq : ∀x:𝕜, ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥)
/-- A normed algebra `𝕜'` over `𝕜` is an algebra endowed with a norm for which the embedding of
`𝕜` in `𝕜'` is an isometry. -/
class normed_algebra (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_ring 𝕜']
extends algebra 𝕜 𝕜' :=
(norm_algebra_map_eq : ∀x:𝕜, ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥)
/-- A normed algebra is a seminormed algebra. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_algebra.to_semi_normed_algebra (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜]
[normed_ring 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] : semi_normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜' :=
{ norm_algebra_map_eq := normed_algebra.norm_algebra_map_eq }
@[simp] lemma norm_algebra_map_eq {𝕜 : Type*} (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [semi_normed_ring 𝕜']
[h : semi_normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] (x : 𝕜) : ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥ :=
semi_normed_algebra.norm_algebra_map_eq _
/-- In a normed algebra, the inclusion of the base field in the extended field is an isometry. -/
lemma algebra_map_isometry (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [semi_normed_ring 𝕜']
[semi_normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] : isometry (algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜') :=
begin
refine isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 (λx y, _),
rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm, ← ring_hom.map_sub, norm_algebra_map_eq],
end
variables (𝕜 : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜]
variables (𝕜' : Type*) [semi_normed_ring 𝕜']
@[priority 100]
instance semi_normed_algebra.to_semi_normed_space [h : semi_normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] :
semi_normed_space 𝕜 𝕜' :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ s x, calc
∥s • x∥ = ∥((algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜') s) * x∥ : by { rw h.smul_def', refl }
... ≤ ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' s∥ * ∥x∥ : semi_normed_ring.norm_mul _ _
... = ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ : by rw norm_algebra_map_eq,
..h }
@[priority 100]
instance normed_algebra.to_normed_space (𝕜 : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] (𝕜' : Type*)
[normed_ring 𝕜'] [h : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] : normed_space 𝕜 𝕜' :=
{ norm_smul_le := semi_normed_space.norm_smul_le,
..h }
instance normed_algebra.id : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜 :=
{ norm_algebra_map_eq := by simp,
.. algebra.id 𝕜}
variables (𝕜') [semi_normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
include 𝕜
lemma normed_algebra.norm_one : ∥(1:𝕜')∥ = 1 :=
by simpa using (norm_algebra_map_eq 𝕜' (1:𝕜))
lemma normed_algebra.norm_one_class : norm_one_class 𝕜' :=
⟨normed_algebra.norm_one 𝕜 𝕜'⟩
lemma normed_algebra.zero_ne_one : (0:𝕜') ≠ 1 :=
begin
refine (ne_zero_of_norm_pos _).symm,
rw normed_algebra.norm_one 𝕜 𝕜', norm_num,
end
lemma normed_algebra.nontrivial : nontrivial 𝕜' :=
⟨⟨0, 1, normed_algebra.zero_ne_one 𝕜 𝕜'⟩⟩
end normed_algebra
section restrict_scalars
variables (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
(E : Type*) [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜' E]
(F : Type*) [semi_normed_group F] [semi_normed_space 𝕜' F]
/-- Warning: This declaration should be used judiciously.
Please consider using `is_scalar_tower` instead.
`𝕜`-seminormed space structure induced by a `𝕜'`-seminormed space structure when `𝕜'` is a
seminormed algebra over `𝕜`. Not registered as an instance as `𝕜'` can not be inferred.
The type synonym `module.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E` will be endowed with this instance by default.
-/
def semi_normed_space.restrict_scalars : semi_normed_space 𝕜 F :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ begin
change ∥(algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' c) • x∥ = ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
simp [norm_smul]
end,
..restrict_scalars.module 𝕜 𝕜' F }
/-- Warning: This declaration should be used judiciously.
Please consider using `is_scalar_tower` instead.
`𝕜`-normed space structure induced by a `𝕜'`-normed space structure when `𝕜'` is a
normed algebra over `𝕜`. Not registered as an instance as `𝕜'` can not be inferred.
The type synonym `module.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E` will be endowed with this instance by default.
-/
def normed_space.restrict_scalars : normed_space 𝕜 E :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ begin
change ∥(algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' c) • x∥ = ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
simp [norm_smul]
end,
..restrict_scalars.module 𝕜 𝕜' E }
instance {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {F : Type*} [I : semi_normed_group F] :
semi_normed_group (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) := I
instance {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {E : Type*} [I : normed_group E] :
normed_group (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) := I
instance module.restrict_scalars.semi_normed_space_orig {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {F : Type*}
[normed_field 𝕜'] [semi_normed_group F] [I : semi_normed_space 𝕜' F] :
semi_normed_space 𝕜' (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) := I
instance module.restrict_scalars.normed_space_orig {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {E : Type*}
[normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_group E] [I : normed_space 𝕜' E] :
normed_space 𝕜' (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) := I
instance : semi_normed_space 𝕜 (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) :=
(semi_normed_space.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F : semi_normed_space 𝕜 F)
instance : normed_space 𝕜 (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) :=
(normed_space.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E : normed_space 𝕜 E)
end restrict_scalars
section summable
open_locale classical
open finset filter
variables [semi_normed_group α] [semi_normed_group β]
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm {f : ι → α} :
cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ i in s, f i) ↔
∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃s:finset ι, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∥ ∑ i in t, f i ∥ < ε :=
begin
rw [cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing, nhds_basis_ball.forall_iff],
{ simp only [ball_0_eq, set.mem_set_of_eq] },
{ rintros s t hst ⟨s', hs'⟩,
exact ⟨s', λ t' ht', hst $ hs' _ ht'⟩ }
end
lemma summable_iff_vanishing_norm [complete_space α] {f : ι → α} :
summable f ↔ ∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃s:finset ι, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∥ ∑ i in t, f i ∥ < ε :=
by rw [summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset, cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm]
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) : cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ i in s, f i) :=
cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm.2 $ assume ε hε,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := summable_iff_vanishing_norm.1 hg ε hε in
⟨s, assume t ht,
have ∥∑ i in t, g i∥ < ε := hs t ht,
have nn : 0 ≤ ∑ i in t, g i := finset.sum_nonneg (assume a _, le_trans (norm_nonneg _) (h a)),
lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_sum_le_of_le t (λ i _, h i)) $
by rwa [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg nn] at this⟩
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_of_summable_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥)) :
cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ a in s, f a) :=
cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
/-- If a function `f` is summable in norm, and along some sequence of finsets exhausting the space
its sum is converging to a limit `a`, then this holds along all finsets, i.e., `f` is summable
with sum `a`. -/
lemma has_sum_of_subseq_of_summable {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥))
{s : γ → finset ι} {p : filter γ} [ne_bot p]
(hs : tendsto s p at_top) {a : α} (ha : tendsto (λ b, ∑ i in s b, f i) p (𝓝 a)) :
has_sum f a :=
tendsto_nhds_of_cauchy_seq_of_subseq (cauchy_seq_finset_of_summable_norm hf) hs ha
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm {f : ℕ → α} {a : α} (hf : summable (λi, ∥f i∥)) :
has_sum f a ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, ∑ i in range n, f i) at_top (𝓝 a) :=
⟨λ h, h.tendsto_sum_nat,
λ h, has_sum_of_subseq_of_summable hf tendsto_finset_range h⟩
/-- The direct comparison test for series: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `g`
which is summable, then `f` is summable. -/
lemma summable_of_norm_bounded
[complete_space α] {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g) (h : ∀i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) :
summable f :=
by { rw summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset, exact cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded g hg h }
lemma has_sum.norm_le_of_bounded {f : ι → α} {g : ι → ℝ} {a : α} {b : ℝ}
(hf : has_sum f a) (hg : has_sum g b) (h : ∀ i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) :
∥a∥ ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' hf.norm hg $ λ s, norm_sum_le_of_le _ $ λ i hi, h i
/-- Quantitative result associated to the direct comparison test for series: If `∑' i, g i` is
summable, and for all `i`, `∥f i∥ ≤ g i`, then `∥∑' i, f i∥ ≤ ∑' i, g i`. Note that we do not
assume that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete space. -/
lemma tsum_of_norm_bounded {f : ι → α} {g : ι → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (hg : has_sum g a)
(h : ∀ i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) :
∥∑' i : ι, f i∥ ≤ a :=
begin
by_cases hf : summable f,
{ exact hf.has_sum.norm_le_of_bounded hg h },
{ rw [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf, norm_zero],
exact ge_of_tendsto' hg (λ s, sum_nonneg $ λ i hi, (norm_nonneg _).trans (h i)) }
end
/-- If `∑' i, ∥f i∥` is summable, then `∥∑' i, f i∥ ≤ (∑' i, ∥f i∥)`. Note that we do not assume
that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete space. -/
lemma norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λi, ∥f i∥)) :
∥∑' i, f i∥ ≤ ∑' i, ∥f i∥ :=
tsum_of_norm_bounded hf.has_sum $ λ i, le_rfl
/-- Quantitative result associated to the direct comparison test for series: If `∑' i, g i` is
summable, and for all `i`, `nnnorm (f i) ≤ g i`, then `nnnorm (∑' i, f i) ≤ ∑' i, g i`. Note that we
do not assume that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete
space. -/
lemma tsum_of_nnnorm_bounded {f : ι → α} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {a : ℝ≥0} (hg : has_sum g a)
(h : ∀ i, nnnorm (f i) ≤ g i) :
nnnorm (∑' i : ι, f i) ≤ a :=
begin
simp only [← nnreal.coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.has_sum_coe, coe_nnnorm] at *,
exact tsum_of_norm_bounded hg h
end
/-- If `∑' i, nnnorm (f i)` is summable, then `nnnorm (∑' i, f i) ≤ ∑' i, nnnorm (f i)`. Note that
we do not assume that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete
space. -/
lemma nnnorm_tsum_le {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λi, nnnorm (f i))) :
nnnorm (∑' i, f i) ≤ ∑' i, nnnorm (f i) :=
tsum_of_nnnorm_bounded hf.has_sum (λ i, le_rfl)
variable [complete_space α]
/-- Variant of the direct comparison test for series: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a
real function `g` which is summable, then `f` is summable. -/
lemma summable_of_norm_bounded_eventually {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) : summable f :=
begin
replace h := mem_cofinite.1 h,
refine h.summable_compl_iff.mp _,
refine summable_of_norm_bounded _ (h.summable_compl_iff.mpr hg) _,
rintros ⟨a, h'⟩,
simpa using h'
end
lemma summable_of_nnnorm_bounded {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ≥0) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀i, ∥f i∥₊ ≤ g i) : summable f :=
summable_of_norm_bounded (λ i, (g i : ℝ)) (nnreal.summable_coe.2 hg) (λ i, by exact_mod_cast h i)
lemma summable_of_summable_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥)) : summable f :=
summable_of_norm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
lemma summable_of_summable_nnnorm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λ a, ∥f a∥₊)) : summable f :=
summable_of_nnnorm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
end summable
namespace uniform_space
namespace completion
variables (V : Type*)
instance [uniform_space V] [has_norm V] :
has_norm (completion V) :=
{ norm := completion.extension has_norm.norm }
@[simp] lemma norm_coe {V} [semi_normed_group V] (v : V) :
∥(v : completion V)∥ = ∥v∥ :=
completion.extension_coe uniform_continuous_norm v
instance [semi_normed_group V] : normed_group (completion V) :=
{ dist_eq :=
begin
intros x y,
apply completion.induction_on₂ x y; clear x y,
{ refine is_closed_eq (completion.uniform_continuous_extension₂ _).continuous _,
exact continuous.comp completion.continuous_extension continuous_sub },
{ intros x y,
rw [← completion.coe_sub, norm_coe, metric.completion.dist_eq, dist_eq_norm] }
end,
.. (show add_comm_group (completion V), by apply_instance),
.. (show metric_space (completion V), by apply_instance) }
end completion
end uniform_space
|
d6c62c5bb68996a1b30bafc1b13273bb02f9f0af | dd0f5513e11c52db157d2fcc8456d9401a6cd9da | /08_Building_Theories_and_Proofs.org.15.lean | 58546623931ffd671a5ce74c7d07363221743197 | [] | no_license | cjmazey/lean-tutorial | ba559a49f82aa6c5848b9bf17b7389bf7f4ba645 | 381f61c9fcac56d01d959ae0fa6e376f2c4e3b34 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,286,098,832 | 1,447,124,923,000 | 1,447,124,923,000 | 43,082,433 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 73 | lean | import standard
definition pr1 [reducible] (A : Type) (a b : A) : A := a
|
c21edcc0e3a6419761d65213b1aa15a5e185fe0f | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/field_theory/ax_grothendieck.lean | 7cec7336d2e9faea04dd1e9dbd81247b6a05ddb2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,106 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2023 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import data.mv_polynomial.basic
import ring_theory.algebraic
import data.fintype.card
/-!
# Ax-Grothendieck for algebraic extensions of `zmod p`
This file proves that if `R` is an algebraic extension of a finite field,
then any injective polynomial map `R^n -> R^n` is also surjective.
This proof is required for the true Ax-Grothendieck theorem, which proves the same result
for any algebraically closed field of characteristic zero.
## TODO
The proof of the theorem for characteristic zero is not in mathlib, but it is at
https://github.com/Jlh18/ModelTheoryInLean8
-/
noncomputable theory
open mv_polynomial finset function
/-- Any injective polynomial map over an algebraic extension of a finite field is surjective. -/
lemma ax_grothendieck_of_locally_finite {ι K R : Type*} [field K] [finite K] [comm_ring R]
[finite ι] [algebra K R] (alg : algebra.is_algebraic K R)
(ps : ι → mv_polynomial ι R)
(hinj : injective (λ v i, eval v (ps i))) :
surjective (λ v i, eval v (ps i)) :=
begin
have is_int : ∀ x : R, is_integral K x,
from λ x, is_algebraic_iff_is_integral.1 (alg x),
classical,
intros v,
casesI nonempty_fintype ι,
/- `s` is the set of all coefficients of the polynomial, as well as all of
the coordinates of `v`, the point I am trying to find the preimage of. -/
let s : finset R := finset.bUnion (univ : finset ι)
(λ i, (ps i).support.image (λ x, coeff x (ps i)))
∪ (univ : finset ι).image v,
have hv : ∀ i, v i ∈ algebra.adjoin K (s : set R),
from λ j, algebra.subset_adjoin
(mem_union_right _
(mem_image.2 ⟨j, mem_univ _, rfl⟩)),
have hs₁ : ∀ (i : ι) (k : ι →₀ ℕ), k ∈ (ps i).support →
coeff k (ps i) ∈ algebra.adjoin K (s : set R),
from λ i k hk, algebra.subset_adjoin
(mem_union_left _ (mem_bUnion.2
⟨i, mem_univ _, mem_image_of_mem _ hk⟩)),
have hs : ∀ i, mv_polynomial.eval v (ps i) ∈ algebra.adjoin K (s : set R),
from λ i, eval_mem (hs₁ _) hv,
letI := is_noetherian_adjoin_finset s (λ x _, is_int x),
letI := module.is_noetherian.finite K (algebra.adjoin K (s : set R)),
letI : finite (algebra.adjoin K (s : set R)) :=
finite_dimensional.finite_of_finite
K (algebra.adjoin K (s : set R)),
/- The restriction of the polynomial map, `ps`, to the subalgebra generated by `s` -/
let res : (ι → algebra.adjoin K (s : set R)) →
(ι → algebra.adjoin K (s : set R)) :=
λ x i, ⟨eval (λ j : ι, (x j : R)) (ps i),
eval_mem (hs₁ _) (λ i, (x i).2)⟩,
have hres_inj : injective res,
{ intros x y hxy,
ext i,
simp only [res, subtype.ext_iff, funext_iff] at hxy,
exact congr_fun (hinj (funext hxy)) i },
have hres_surj : surjective res,
from finite.injective_iff_surjective.1 hres_inj,
cases hres_surj (λ i, ⟨v i, hv i⟩) with w hw,
use λ i, w i,
simpa only [res, subtype.ext_iff, funext_iff] using hw,
end
|
916be6aa5d741ab9bd984bffd1bc57f81f7786f4 | 26ac254ecb57ffcb886ff709cf018390161a9225 | /test/library_search/basic.lean | 469581490b4d3ea86a347efa56019924b5c15411 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eric-wieser/mathlib | 42842584f584359bbe1fc8b88b3ff937c8acd72d | d0df6b81cd0920ad569158c06a3fd5abb9e63301 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,546,404,255 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 281,173,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,263,582,000 | 1,595,263,581,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,755 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import tactic.suggest -- No other imports, for fast testing
/- Turn off trace messages so they don't pollute the test build: -/
set_option trace.silence_library_search true
/- For debugging purposes, we can display the list of lemmas: -/
-- set_option trace.suggest true
namespace test.library_search
-- Check that `library_search` fails if there are no goals.
example : true :=
begin
trivial,
success_if_fail { library_search },
end
-- Verify that `library_search` solves goals via `solve_by_elim` when the library isn't
-- even needed.
example (P : Prop) (p : P) : P :=
by library_search
example (P : Prop) (p : P) (np : ¬P) : false :=
by library_search
example (X : Type) (P : Prop) (x : X) (h : Π x : X, x = x → P) : P :=
by library_search
example (α : Prop) : α → α :=
by library_search -- says: `exact id`
example (p : Prop) [decidable p] : (¬¬p) → p :=
by library_search -- says: `exact not_not.mp`
example (a b : Prop) (h : a ∧ b) : a :=
by library_search -- says: `exact h.left`
example (P Q : Prop) [decidable P] [decidable Q]: (¬ Q → ¬ P) → (P → Q) :=
by library_search -- says: `exact not_imp_not.mp`
example (a b : ℕ) : a + b = b + a :=
by library_search -- says: `exact add_comm a b`
example (n m k : ℕ) : n * (m - k) = n * m - n * k :=
by library_search -- says: `exact nat.mul_sub_left_distrib n m k`
example (n m k : ℕ) : n * m - n * k = n * (m - k) :=
by library_search -- says: `exact eq.symm (nat.mul_sub_left_distrib n m k)`
example {α : Type} (x y : α) : x = y ↔ y = x :=
by library_search -- says: `exact eq_comm`
example (a b : ℕ) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
by library_search -- says: `exact add_pos ha hb`
section synonym
-- Synonym `>` for `<` in another part of the goal
example (a b : ℕ) (ha : a > 0) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
by library_search -- says: `exact add_pos ha hb`
example (a b : ℕ) (h : a ∣ b) (w : b > 0) : a ≤ b :=
by library_search -- says: `exact nat.le_of_dvd w h`
example (a b : ℕ) (h : a ∣ b) (w : b > 0) : b ≥ a :=
by library_search -- says: `exact nat.le_of_dvd w h`
-- A lemma with head symbol `¬` can be used to prove `¬ p` or `⊥`
example (a : ℕ) : ¬ (a < 0) := by library_search -- says `exact not_lt_bot`
example (a : ℕ) (h : a < 0) : false := by library_search -- says `exact not_lt_bot h`
-- An inductive type hides the constructor's arguments enough
-- so that `library_search` doesn't accidentally close the goal.
inductive P : ℕ → Prop
| gt_in_head {n : ℕ} : n < 0 → P n
-- This lemma with `>` as its head symbol should also be found for goals with head symbol `<`.
lemma lemma_with_gt_in_head (a : ℕ) (h : P a) : 0 > a := by { cases h, assumption }
-- This lemma with `false` as its head symbols should also be found for goals with head symbol `¬`.
lemma lemma_with_false_in_head (a b : ℕ) (h1 : a < b) (h2 : P a) : false :=
by { apply nat.not_lt_zero, cases h2, assumption }
example (a : ℕ) (h : P a) : 0 > a := by library_search -- says `exact lemma_with_gt_in_head a h`
example (a : ℕ) (h : P a) : a < 0 := by library_search -- says `exact lemma_with_gt_in_head a h`
example (a b : ℕ) (h1 : a < b) (h2 : P a) : false := by library_search
-- says `exact lemma_with_false_in_head a b h1 h2`
example (a b : ℕ) (h1 : a < b) : ¬ (P a) := by library_search!
-- says `exact lemma_with_false_in_head a b h1`
end synonym
-- We even find `iff` results:
example : ∀ P : Prop, ¬(P ↔ ¬P) :=
by library_search! -- says: `λ (a : Prop), (iff_not_self a).mp`
example {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : a ∣ c) (h₂ : a ∣ b + c) : a ∣ b :=
by library_search -- says `exact (nat.dvd_add_left h₁).mp h₂`
-- Checking examples from issue #2220
example {α : Sort*} (h : empty) : α :=
by library_search
example {α : Type*} (h : empty) : α :=
by library_search
def map_from_sum {A B C : Type} (f : A → C) (g : B → C) : (A ⊕ B) → C := by library_search
-- Test that we can provide custom `apply` tactics,
-- e.g. to change how aggressively we unfold definitions in trying to apply lemmas.
lemma bind_singleton {α β} (x : α) (f : α → list β) : list.bind [x] f = f x :=
begin
success_if_fail {
library_search { apply := λ e, tactic.apply e { md := tactic.transparency.reducible } },
},
library_search!,
end
constant f : ℕ → ℕ
axiom F (a b : ℕ) : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b
example (a b : ℕ) (h : a ≤ b) : f a ≤ f b := by library_search
-- Test #3432
theorem nonzero_gt_one (n : ℕ) : ¬ n = 0 → n ≥ 1 :=
by library_search! -- `exact nat.pos_of_ne_zero`
end test.library_search
|
905dec26bd2b956d30f1b3255ad82cb2ad36eac1 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/data/list/nodup.lean | ec6d0989c2caccfb9b8de3921df539136b3c10ab | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,240 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kenny Lau
-/
import data.list.pairwise
import data.list.forall2
/-!
# Lists with no duplicates
`list.nodup` is defined in `data/list/defs`. In this file we prove various properties of this
predicate.
-/
universes u v
open nat function
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace list
@[simp] theorem forall_mem_ne {a : α} {l : list α} : (∀ (a' : α), a' ∈ l → ¬a = a') ↔ a ∉ l :=
⟨λ h m, h _ m rfl, λ h a' m e, h (e.symm ▸ m)⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_nil : @nodup α [] := pairwise.nil
@[simp] theorem nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} : nodup (a::l) ↔ a ∉ l ∧ nodup l :=
by simp only [nodup, pairwise_cons, forall_mem_ne]
protected lemma pairwise.nodup {l : list α} {r : α → α → Prop} [is_irrefl α r] (h : pairwise r l) :
nodup l :=
h.imp $ λ a b, ne_of_irrefl
lemma rel_nodup {r : α → β → Prop} (hr : relator.bi_unique r) : (forall₂ r ⇒ (↔)) nodup nodup
| _ _ forall₂.nil := by simp only [nodup_nil]
| _ _ (forall₂.cons hab h) :=
by simpa only [nodup_cons] using relator.rel_and (relator.rel_not (rel_mem hr hab h))
(rel_nodup h)
theorem nodup_cons_of_nodup {a : α} {l : list α} (m : a ∉ l) (n : nodup l) : nodup (a::l) :=
nodup_cons.2 ⟨m, n⟩
theorem nodup_singleton (a : α) : nodup [a] :=
nodup_cons_of_nodup (not_mem_nil a) nodup_nil
theorem nodup_of_nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup (a::l)) : nodup l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).2
theorem not_mem_of_nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup (a::l)) : a ∉ l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).1
theorem not_nodup_cons_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l → ¬ nodup (a :: l) :=
imp_not_comm.1 not_mem_of_nodup_cons
theorem nodup_of_sublist {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → nodup l₂ → nodup l₁ :=
pairwise_of_sublist
theorem not_nodup_pair (a : α) : ¬ nodup [a, a] :=
not_nodup_cons_of_mem $ mem_singleton_self _
theorem nodup_iff_sublist {l : list α} : nodup l ↔ ∀ a, ¬ [a, a] <+ l :=
⟨λ d a h, not_nodup_pair a (nodup_of_sublist h d), begin
induction l with a l IH; intro h, {exact nodup_nil},
exact nodup_cons_of_nodup
(λ al, h a $ cons_sublist_cons _ $ singleton_sublist.2 al)
(IH $ λ a s, h a $ sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s)
end⟩
theorem nodup_iff_nth_le_inj {l : list α} :
nodup l ↔ ∀ i j h₁ h₂, nth_le l i h₁ = nth_le l j h₂ → i = j :=
pairwise_iff_nth_le.trans
⟨λ H i j h₁ h₂ h, ((lt_trichotomy _ _)
.resolve_left (λ h', H _ _ h₂ h' h))
.resolve_right (λ h', H _ _ h₁ h' h.symm),
λ H i j h₁ h₂ h, ne_of_lt h₂ (H _ _ _ _ h)⟩
@[simp] theorem nth_le_index_of [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} (H : nodup l) (n h) :
index_of (nth_le l n h) l = n :=
nodup_iff_nth_le_inj.1 H _ _ _ h $
index_of_nth_le $ index_of_lt_length.2 $ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem nodup_iff_count_le_one [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} : nodup l ↔ ∀ a, count a l ≤ 1 :=
nodup_iff_sublist.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a,
have [a, a] <+ l ↔ 1 < count a l, from (@le_count_iff_repeat_sublist _ _ a l 2).symm,
(not_congr this).trans not_lt
theorem nodup_repeat (a : α) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, nodup (repeat a n) ↔ n ≤ 1
| 0 := by simp [nat.zero_le]
| 1 := by simp
| (n+2) := iff_of_false
(λ H, nodup_iff_sublist.1 H a ((repeat_sublist_repeat _).2 (le_add_left 2 n)))
(not_le_of_lt $ le_add_left 2 n)
@[simp] theorem count_eq_one_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α}
(d : nodup l) (h : a ∈ l) : count a l = 1 :=
le_antisymm (nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 d a) (count_pos.2 h)
theorem nodup_of_nodup_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) → nodup l₁ :=
nodup_of_sublist (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
theorem nodup_of_nodup_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) → nodup l₂ :=
nodup_of_sublist (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) ↔ nodup l₁ ∧ nodup l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [nodup, pairwise_append, disjoint_iff_ne]
theorem disjoint_of_nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : nodup (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(nodup_append.1 d).2.2
theorem nodup_append_of_nodup {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : nodup l₂)
(dj : disjoint l₁ l₂) : nodup (l₁++l₂) :=
nodup_append.2 ⟨d₁, d₂, dj⟩
theorem nodup_append_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) ↔ nodup (l₂++l₁) :=
by simp only [nodup_append, and.left_comm, disjoint_comm]
theorem nodup_middle {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁ ++ a::l₂) ↔ nodup (a::(l₁++l₂)) :=
by simp only [nodup_append, not_or_distrib, and.left_comm, and_assoc, nodup_cons, mem_append,
disjoint_cons_right]
theorem nodup_of_nodup_map (f : α → β) {l : list α} : nodup (map f l) → nodup l :=
pairwise_of_pairwise_map f $ λ a b, mt $ congr_arg f
theorem nodup_map_on {f : α → β} {l : list α} (H : ∀x∈l, ∀y∈l, f x = f y → x = y)
(d : nodup l) : nodup (map f l) :=
pairwise_map_of_pairwise _ (by exact λ a b ⟨ma, mb, n⟩ e, n (H a ma b mb e)) (pairwise.and_mem.1 d)
theorem nodup_map {f : α → β} {l : list α} (hf : injective f) : nodup l → nodup (map f l) :=
nodup_map_on (assume x _ y _ h, hf h)
theorem nodup_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : list α} (hf : injective f) : nodup (map f l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨nodup_of_nodup_map _, nodup_map hf⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_attach {l : list α} : nodup (attach l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨λ h, attach_map_val l ▸ nodup_map (λ a b, subtype.eq) h,
λ h, nodup_of_nodup_map subtype.val ((attach_map_val l).symm ▸ h)⟩
theorem nodup_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {l : list α} {H}
(hf : ∀ a ha b hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h : nodup l) : nodup (pmap f l H) :=
by rw [pmap_eq_map_attach]; exact nodup_map
(λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h, by congr; exact hf a (H _ ha) b (H _ hb) h)
(nodup_attach.2 h)
theorem nodup_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {l} : nodup l → nodup (filter p l) :=
pairwise_filter_of_pairwise p
@[simp] theorem nodup_reverse {l : list α} : nodup (reverse l) ↔ nodup l :=
pairwise_reverse.trans $ by simp only [nodup, ne.def, eq_comm]
theorem nodup_erase_eq_filter [decidable_eq α] (a : α) {l} (d : nodup l) :
l.erase a = filter (≠ a) l :=
begin
induction d with b l m d IH, {refl},
by_cases b = a,
{ subst h, rw [erase_cons_head, filter_cons_of_neg],
symmetry, rw filter_eq_self, simpa only [ne.def, eq_comm] using m, exact not_not_intro rfl },
{ rw [erase_cons_tail _ h, filter_cons_of_pos, IH], exact h }
end
theorem nodup_erase_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] (a : α) {l} : nodup l → nodup (l.erase a) :=
nodup_of_sublist (erase_sublist _ _)
theorem nodup_diff [decidable_eq α] : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁.nodup), (l₁.diff l₂).nodup
| l₁ [] h := h
| l₁ (a::l₂) h := by rw diff_cons; exact nodup_diff (nodup_erase_of_nodup _ h)
theorem mem_erase_iff_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {a b : α} {l} (d : nodup l) :
a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l :=
by rw nodup_erase_eq_filter b d; simp only [mem_filter, and_comm]
theorem mem_erase_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l} (h : nodup l) : a ∉ l.erase a :=
λ H, ((mem_erase_iff_of_nodup h).1 H).1 rfl
theorem nodup_join {L : list (list α)} :
nodup (join L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, nodup l) ∧ pairwise disjoint L :=
by simp only [nodup, pairwise_join, disjoint_left.symm, forall_mem_ne]
theorem nodup_bind {l₁ : list α} {f : α → list β} : nodup (l₁.bind f) ↔
(∀ x ∈ l₁, nodup (f x)) ∧ pairwise (λ (a b : α), disjoint (f a) (f b)) l₁ :=
by simp only [list.bind, nodup_join, pairwise_map, and_comm, and.left_comm, mem_map,
exists_imp_distrib, and_imp];
rw [show (∀ (l : list β) (x : α), f x = l → x ∈ l₁ → nodup l) ↔
(∀ (x : α), x ∈ l₁ → nodup (f x)),
from forall_swap.trans $ forall_congr $ λ_, forall_eq']
theorem nodup_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : nodup l₂) :
nodup (product l₁ l₂) :=
nodup_bind.2
⟨λ a ma, nodup_map (left_inverse.injective (λ b, (rfl : (a,b).2 = b))) d₂,
d₁.imp $ λ a₁ a₂ n x h₁ h₂, begin
rcases mem_map.1 h₁ with ⟨b₁, mb₁, rfl⟩,
rcases mem_map.1 h₂ with ⟨b₂, mb₂, ⟨⟩⟩,
exact n rfl
end⟩
theorem nodup_sigma {σ : α → Type*} {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)}
(d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : ∀ a, nodup (l₂ a)) : nodup (l₁.sigma l₂) :=
nodup_bind.2
⟨λ a ma, nodup_map (λ b b' h, by injection h with _ h; exact eq_of_heq h) (d₂ a),
d₁.imp $ λ a₁ a₂ n x h₁ h₂, begin
rcases mem_map.1 h₁ with ⟨b₁, mb₁, rfl⟩,
rcases mem_map.1 h₂ with ⟨b₂, mb₂, ⟨⟩⟩,
exact n rfl
end⟩
theorem nodup_filter_map {f : α → option β} {l : list α}
(H : ∀ (a a' : α) (b : β), b ∈ f a → b ∈ f a' → a = a') :
nodup l → nodup (filter_map f l) :=
pairwise_filter_map_of_pairwise f $ λ a a' n b bm b' bm' e, n $ H a a' b' (e ▸ bm) bm'
theorem nodup_concat {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) (h' : nodup l) : nodup (concat l a) :=
by rw concat_eq_append; exact nodup_append_of_nodup h' (nodup_singleton _) (disjoint_singleton.2 h)
theorem nodup_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup l) : nodup (insert a l) :=
if h' : a ∈ l then by rw [insert_of_mem h']; exact h
else by rw [insert_of_not_mem h', nodup_cons]; split; assumption
theorem nodup_union [decidable_eq α] (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : nodup l₂) :
nodup (l₁ ∪ l₂) :=
begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ ih generalizing l₂,
{ exact h },
apply nodup_insert,
exact ih h
end
theorem nodup_inter_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {l₁ : list α} (l₂) : nodup l₁ → nodup (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
nodup_filter _
@[simp] theorem nodup_sublists {l : list α} : nodup (sublists l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨λ h, nodup_of_nodup_map _ (nodup_of_sublist (map_ret_sublist_sublists _) h),
λ h, (pairwise_sublists h).imp (λ _ _ h, mt reverse_inj.2 h.to_ne)⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_sublists' {l : list α} : nodup (sublists' l) ↔ nodup l :=
by rw [sublists'_eq_sublists, nodup_map_iff reverse_injective,
nodup_sublists, nodup_reverse]
lemma nodup_sublists_len {α : Type*} (n) {l : list α}
(nd : nodup l) : (sublists_len n l).nodup :=
nodup_of_sublist (sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _) (nodup_sublists'.2 nd)
lemma diff_eq_filter_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] :
∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl₁ : l₁.nodup), l₁.diff l₂ = l₁.filter (∉ l₂)
| l₁ [] hl₁ := by simp
| l₁ (a::l₂) hl₁ :=
begin
rw [diff_cons, diff_eq_filter_of_nodup (nodup_erase_of_nodup _ hl₁),
nodup_erase_eq_filter _ hl₁, filter_filter],
simp only [mem_cons_iff, not_or_distrib, and.comm],
congr
end
lemma mem_diff_iff_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl₁ : l₁.nodup) {a : α} :
a ∈ l₁.diff l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∉ l₂ :=
by rw [diff_eq_filter_of_nodup hl₁, mem_filter]
lemma nodup_update_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} {a : α} (hl : l.nodup) (ha : a ∉ l),
(l.update_nth n a).nodup
| [] n a hl ha := nodup_nil
| (b::l) 0 a hl ha := nodup_cons.2 ⟨mt (mem_cons_of_mem _) ha, (nodup_cons.1 hl).2⟩
| (b::l) (n+1) a hl ha := nodup_cons.2
⟨λ h, (mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth h).elim
(nodup_cons.1 hl).1
(λ hba, ha (hba ▸ mem_cons_self _ _)),
nodup_update_nth (nodup_cons.1 hl).2 (mt (mem_cons_of_mem _) ha)⟩
lemma nodup.map_update [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} (hl : l.nodup) (f : α → β) (x : α) (y : β) :
l.map (function.update f x y) =
if x ∈ l then (l.map f).update_nth (l.index_of x) y else l.map f :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ihl, { simp },
rw [nodup_cons] at hl,
simp only [mem_cons_iff, map, ihl hl.2],
by_cases H : hd = x,
{ subst hd,
simp [update_nth, hl.1] },
{ simp [ne.symm H, H, update_nth, ← apply_ite (cons (f hd))] }
end
end list
theorem option.to_list_nodup {α} : ∀ o : option α, o.to_list.nodup
| none := list.nodup_nil
| (some x) := list.nodup_singleton x
|
3bc7b90a8f26ffe79db82f899e02cb50a0dd2381 | 7007bb645068e0b6b859aab9da7cf5c1c79e98be | /library/init/meta/widget/interactive_expr.lean | 43c965641e202c0fbaafcf5256110717b8a0c674 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | EdAyers/lean | 7d3fb852380bc386545ebc119b7d03c128c3ce1c | be72c8dc527a062e243a408480f487a55b06cb0a | refs/heads/master | 1,624,443,179,694 | 1,592,837,958,000 | 1,592,837,958,000 | 154,972,348 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,557,768,267,000 | 1,540,649,772,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,089 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) E.W.Ayers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: E.W.Ayers
-/
prelude
import init.meta.widget.basic
import init.meta.widget.tactic_component
import init.meta.tagged_format
import init.data.punit
import init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance
meta def subexpr := (expr × expr.address)
namespace widget
open tagged_format
open html attr
namespace interactive_expression
/-- eformat but without any of the formatting stuff like highlighting, groups etc. -/
meta inductive sf : Type
| tag_expr : expr.address → expr → sf → sf
| compose : sf → sf → sf
| of_string : string → sf
private meta def to_simple : eformat → sf
| (tag ⟨ea,e⟩ m) := sf.tag_expr ea e $ to_simple m
| (group m) := to_simple m
| (nest i m) := to_simple m
| (highlight i m) := to_simple m
| (of_format f) := sf.of_string $ format.to_string f
| (compose x y) := sf.compose (to_simple x) (to_simple y)
private meta def sf.flatten : sf → sf
| (sf.tag_expr e ea m) := (sf.tag_expr e ea $ sf.flatten m)
| (sf.compose x y) :=
match (sf.flatten x), (sf.flatten y) with
| (sf.of_string sx), (sf.of_string sy) := sf.of_string (sx ++ sy)
| (sf.of_string sx), (sf.compose (sf.of_string sy) z) := sf.compose (sf.of_string (sx ++ sy)) z
| (sf.compose x (sf.of_string sy)), (sf.of_string sz) := sf.compose x (sf.of_string (sy ++ sz))
| (sf.compose x (sf.of_string sy1)), (sf.compose (sf.of_string sy2) z) := sf.compose x (sf.compose (sf.of_string (sy1 ++ sy2)) z)
| x, y := sf.compose x y
end
| (sf.of_string s) := sf.of_string s
meta inductive action (γ : Type)
| on_mouse_enter : subexpr → action
| on_mouse_leave_all : action
| on_click : subexpr → action
| on_tooltip_action : γ → action
| on_close_tooltip : action
meta def view {γ} (tooltip_component : tc subexpr (action γ)) (click_address : option expr.address) (select_address : option expr.address) :
subexpr → sf → tactic (list (html (action γ)))
| ⟨ce, current_address⟩ (sf.tag_expr ea e m) := do
let new_address := current_address ++ ea,
let select_attrs : list (attr (action γ)) := if some new_address = select_address then [className "highlight"] else [],
click_attrs : list (attr (action γ)) ←
if some new_address = click_address then do
content ← tc.to_html tooltip_component (e, new_address),
pure [tooltip $ h "div" [] [
h "button" [cn "fr pointer ba br3", on_click (λ _, action.on_close_tooltip)] ["x"],
content
]]
else pure [],
let as := [className "expr-boundary", key (ea)] ++ select_attrs ++ click_attrs,
inner ← view (e,new_address) m,
pure [h "span" as inner]
| ca (sf.compose x y) := pure (++) <*> view ca x <*> view ca y
| ca (sf.of_string s) := pure
[h "span" [
on_mouse_enter (λ _, action.on_mouse_enter ca),
on_click (λ _, action.on_click ca),
key s
] [html.of_string s]]
/-- Make an interactive expression. -/
meta def mk {γ} (tooltip : tc subexpr γ) : tc expr γ :=
let tooltip_comp :=
component.with_props_eq (λ (x y : tactic_state × expr × expr.address), x.2.2 = y.2.2)
$ component.map_action (action.on_tooltip_action) tooltip in
tc.mk_simple
(action γ)
(option subexpr × option subexpr)
(λ e, pure $ (none, none))
(λ e ⟨ca, sa⟩ act, pure $
match act with
| (action.on_mouse_enter ⟨e, ea⟩) := ((ca, some (e, ea)), none)
| (action.on_mouse_leave_all) := ((ca, none), none)
| (action.on_click ⟨e, ea⟩) := if some (e,ea) = ca then ((none, sa), none) else ((some (e, ea), sa), none)
| (action.on_tooltip_action g) := ((none, sa), some g)
| (action.on_close_tooltip) := ((none, sa), none)
end
)
(λ e ⟨ca, sa⟩, do
ts ← tactic.read,
let m : sf := sf.flatten $ to_simple $ tactic_state.pp_tagged ts e,
let m : sf := sf.tag_expr [] e m, -- [hack] in pp.cpp I forgot to add an expr-boundary for the root expression.
v ← view tooltip_comp (prod.snd <$> ca) (prod.snd <$> sa) ⟨e, []⟩ m,
pure $
[ h "span" [
className "expr",
key e.hash,
on_mouse_leave (λ _, action.on_mouse_leave_all) ] $ v
]
)
/-- Render the implicit arguments for an expression in fancy, little pills. -/
meta def implicit_arg_list (tooltip : tc subexpr empty) (e : expr) : tactic $ html empty := do
fn ← (mk tooltip) $ expr.get_app_fn e,
args ← list.mmap (mk tooltip) $ expr.get_app_args e,
pure $ h "div" []
( (h "span" [className "bg-blue br3 ma1 ph2 white"] [fn]) ::
list.map (λ a, h "span" [className "bg-gray br3 ma1 ph2 white"] [a]) args
)
meta def type_tooltip : tc subexpr empty :=
tc.stateless (λ ⟨e,ea⟩, do
y ← tactic.infer_type e,
y_comp ← mk type_tooltip y,
implicit_args ← implicit_arg_list type_tooltip e,
pure [
h "div" [] [
h "div" [] [y_comp],
h "hr" [] [],
implicit_args
]
]
)
end interactive_expression
@[derive decidable_eq]
meta inductive filter_type
| none
| no_instances
| only_props
meta def filter_local : filter_type → expr → tactic bool
| (filter_type.none) e := pure tt
| (filter_type.no_instances) e := do
t ← tactic.infer_type e,
bnot <$> tactic.is_class t
| (filter_type.only_props) e := do
t ← tactic.infer_type e,
tactic.is_prop t
meta def filter_component : component filter_type filter_type :=
component.stateless (λ lf,
[ h "label" [] ["filter: "],
select [
⟨filter_type.none, "0", ["no filter"]⟩,
⟨filter_type.no_instances, "1", ["no instances"]⟩,
⟨filter_type.only_props, "2", ["only props"]⟩
] lf
]
)
meta def html.of_name {α : Type} : name → html α
| n := html.of_string $ name.to_string n
open tactic
meta def show_type_component : tc expr empty :=
tc.stateless (λ x, do
y ← infer_type x,
y_comp ← interactive_expression.mk interactive_expression.type_tooltip $ y,
pure y_comp
)
/-- A group of local constants in the context that should be rendered as one line. -/
@[derive decidable_eq]
meta structure local_collection :=
(key : string)
(locals : list expr)
(type : expr)
/-- Group consecutive locals according to whether they have the same type -/
meta def to_local_collection : list local_collection → list expr → tactic (list local_collection)
| acc [] := pure $ list.map (λ lc : local_collection, {locals := lc.locals.reverse, ..lc}) $ list.reverse $ acc
| acc (l::ls) := do
l_type ← infer_type l,
(do (⟨k,ns,t⟩::acc) ← pure acc,
is_def_eq t l_type,
to_local_collection (⟨k,l::ns,t⟩::acc) ls)
<|> (to_local_collection (⟨to_string $ expr.local_uniq_name $ l, [l], l_type⟩::acc) ls)
/-- Component that displays the main (first) goal. -/
meta def tactic_view_goal {γ} (local_c : tc local_collection γ) (target_c : tc expr γ) : tc filter_type γ :=
tc.stateless $ λ ft, do
g@(expr.mvar u_n pp_n y) ← main_goal,
set_goals [g],
lcs ← local_context,
lcs ← list.mfilter (filter_local ft) lcs,
lcs ← to_local_collection [] lcs,
lchs ← lcs.mmap (λ lc, do
lh ← local_c lc,
ns ← pure $ lc.locals.map (λ n, h "span" [cn "goal-hyp b ml2"] [html.of_name $ expr.local_pp_name n]),
pure $ h "li" [key lc.key] (ns ++ [" : ", h "span" [cn "goal-hyp-type"] [lh]])),
t_comp ← target_c g,
pure $ h "ul" [key g.hash, className "list pl0 font-code"] $ lchs ++ [
h "li" [key u_n] [
h "span" [cn "goal-vdash b"] ["⊢ "],
t_comp
]]
meta inductive tactic_view_action (γ : Type)
| out (a:γ): tactic_view_action
| filter (f: filter_type): tactic_view_action
/-- Component that displays all goals, together with the `$n goals` message. -/
meta def tactic_view_component {γ} (local_c : tc local_collection γ) (target_c : tc expr γ) : tc unit γ :=
tc.mk_simple
(tactic_view_action γ)
(filter_type)
(λ _, pure $ filter_type.none)
(λ ⟨⟩ ft a, match a with
| (tactic_view_action.out a) := pure (ft, some a)
| (tactic_view_action.filter ft) := pure (ft, none)
end)
(λ ⟨⟩ ft, do
gs ← get_goals,
hs ← gs.mmap (λ g, do set_goals [g], flip tc.to_html ft $ tactic_view_goal local_c target_c),
set_goals gs,
let goal_message :=
if gs.length = 0 then
"goals accomplished"
else if gs.length = 1 then
"1 goal"
else
to_string gs.length ++ " goals",
let goal_message : html γ := h "strong" [cn "goal-goals"] [goal_message],
let goals : html γ := h "ul" [className "list pl0"]
$ list.map_with_index (λ i x,
let border_cn := if i < hs.length then "ba bl-0 bt-0 br-0 b--dotted b--black-30" else "" in
h "li" [className $ "lh-copy " ++ border_cn, key i] [x])
$ (goal_message :: hs),
pure [
h "div" [className "fr"] [html.of_component ft $ component.map_action tactic_view_action.filter filter_component],
html.map_action tactic_view_action.out goals
])
/-- Component that displays the term-mode goal. -/
meta def tactic_view_term_goal {γ} (local_c : tc local_collection γ) (target_c : tc expr γ) : tc unit γ :=
tc.stateless $ λ _, do
goal ← flip tc.to_html (filter_type.none) $ tactic_view_goal local_c target_c,
pure [h "ul" [className "list pl0"] [
h "li" [className "lh-copy"] [h "strong" [cn "goal-goals"] ["expected type:"]],
h "li" [className "lh-copy"] [goal]]]
meta def show_local_collection_component : tc local_collection empty :=
tc.stateless (λ lc, do
(l::_) ← pure lc.locals,
c ← show_type_component l,
pure [c]
)
meta def tactic_render : tc unit string :=
component.ignore_action $ tactic_view_component show_local_collection_component show_type_component
meta def tactic_state_widget : component tactic_state string :=
tc.to_component tactic_render
/--
Widget used to display term-proof goals.
-/
meta def term_goal_widget : component tactic_state string :=
(tactic_view_term_goal show_local_collection_component show_type_component).to_component
end widget
|
5f44eda505e67e22c88e5cc9159ab15b3c40f720 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/group_theory/subsemigroup/membership.lean | 90d4d0e144b89cb2980f2e9f8fad7d797bb8b8fe | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,991 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import group_theory.subsemigroup.basic
/-!
# Subsemigroups: membership criteria
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file we prove various facts about membership in a subsemigroup.
The intent is to mimic `group_theory/submonoid/membership`, but currently this file is mostly a
stub and only provides rudimentary support.
* `mem_supr_of_directed`, `coe_supr_of_directed`, `mem_Sup_of_directed_on`,
`coe_Sup_of_directed_on`: the supremum of a directed collection of subsemigroup is their union.
## TODO
* Define the `free_semigroup` generated by a set. This might require some rather substantial
additions to low-level API. For example, developing the subtype of nonempty lists, then defining
a product on nonempty lists, powers where the exponent is a positive natural, et cetera.
Another option would be to define the `free_semigroup` as the subsemigroup (pushed to be a
semigroup) of the `free_monoid` consisting of non-identity elements.
## Tags
subsemigroup
-/
variables {ι : Sort*} {M A B : Type*}
section non_assoc
variables [has_mul M]
open set
namespace subsemigroup
-- TODO: this section can be generalized to `[mul_mem_class B M] [complete_lattice B]`
-- such that `complete_lattice.le` coincides with `set_like.le`
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_supr_of_directed {S : ι → subsemigroup M} (hS : directed (≤) S) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⨆ i, S i) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ S i :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ ⟨i, hi⟩, (set_like.le_def.1 $ le_supr S i) hi⟩,
suffices : x ∈ closure (⋃ i, (S i : set M)) → ∃ i, x ∈ S i,
by simpa only [closure_Union, closure_eq (S _)] using this,
refine (λ hx, closure_induction hx (λ y hy, mem_Union.mp hy) _),
{ rintros x y ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩,
rcases hS i j with ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩,
exact ⟨k, (S k).mul_mem (hki hi) (hkj hj)⟩ }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma coe_supr_of_directed {S : ι → subsemigroup M} (hS : directed (≤) S) :
((⨆ i, S i : subsemigroup M) : set M) = ⋃ i, ↑(S i) :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp [mem_supr_of_directed hS]
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_Sup_of_directed_on {S : set (subsemigroup M)}
(hS : directed_on (≤) S) {x : M} :
x ∈ Sup S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, x ∈ s :=
by simp only [Sup_eq_supr', mem_supr_of_directed hS.directed_coe, set_coe.exists, subtype.coe_mk]
@[to_additive]
lemma coe_Sup_of_directed_on {S : set (subsemigroup M)}
(hS : directed_on (≤) S) :
(↑(Sup S) : set M) = ⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp [mem_Sup_of_directed_on hS]
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_sup_left {S T : subsemigroup M} : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show S ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_left
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_sup_right {S T : subsemigroup M} : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show T ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_right
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_mem_sup {S T : subsemigroup M} {x y : M} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ T) : x * y ∈ S ⊔ T :=
mul_mem (mem_sup_left hx) (mem_sup_right hy)
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_supr_of_mem {S : ι → subsemigroup M} (i : ι) :
∀ {x : M}, x ∈ S i → x ∈ supr S :=
show S i ≤ supr S, from le_supr _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_Sup_of_mem {S : set (subsemigroup M)} {s : subsemigroup M}
(hs : s ∈ S) : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ s → x ∈ Sup S :=
show s ≤ Sup S, from le_Sup hs
/-- An induction principle for elements of `⨆ i, S i`.
If `C` holds all elements of `S i` for all `i`, and is preserved under multiplication,
then it holds for all elements of the supremum of `S`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator, to_additive /-" An induction principle for elements of `⨆ i, S i`.
If `C` holds all elements of `S i` for all `i`, and is preserved under addition,
then it holds for all elements of the supremum of `S`. "-/]
lemma supr_induction (S : ι → subsemigroup M) {C : M → Prop} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, S i)
(hp : ∀ i (x ∈ S i), C x)
(hmul : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x * y)) : C x :=
begin
rw supr_eq_closure at hx,
refine closure_induction hx (λ x hx, _) hmul,
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := set.mem_Union.mp hx,
exact hp _ _ hi,
end
/-- A dependent version of `subsemigroup.supr_induction`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator, to_additive /-"A dependent version of `add_subsemigroup.supr_induction`. "-/]
lemma supr_induction' (S : ι → subsemigroup M) {C : Π x, (x ∈ ⨆ i, S i) → Prop}
(hp : ∀ i (x ∈ S i), C x (mem_supr_of_mem i ‹_›))
(hmul : ∀ x y hx hy, C x hx → C y hy → C (x * y) (mul_mem ‹_› ‹_›))
{x : M} (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, S i) : C x hx :=
begin
refine exists.elim _ (λ (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, S i) (hc : C x hx), hc),
refine supr_induction S hx (λ i x hx, _) (λ x y, _),
{ exact ⟨_, hp _ _ hx⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨_, Cx⟩ ⟨_, Cy⟩,
exact ⟨_, hmul _ _ _ _ Cx Cy⟩ },
end
end subsemigroup
end non_assoc
|
5a5da4eded35707b6504828820592d30ad03f9ff | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/measure_theory/measure/finite_measure.lean | 3efd56a6070fefd63589e64bbf5e857c48b26fb9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 33,306 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import topology.continuous_function.bounded
import topology.algebra.module.weak_dual
import measure_theory.integral.bochner
/-!
# Finite measures
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file defines the type of finite measures on a given measurable space. When the underlying
space has a topology and the measurable space structure (sigma algebra) is finer than the Borel
sigma algebra, then the type of finite measures is equipped with the topology of weak convergence
of measures. The topology of weak convergence is the coarsest topology w.r.t. which
for every bounded continuous `ℝ≥0`-valued function `f`, the integration of `f` against the
measure is continuous.
## Main definitions
The main definitions are
* the type `measure_theory.finite_measure Ω` with the topology of weak convergence;
* `measure_theory.finite_measure.to_weak_dual_bcnn : finite_measure Ω → (weak_dual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0))`
allowing to interpret a finite measure as a continuous linear functional on the space of
bounded continuous nonnegative functions on `Ω`. This is used for the definition of the
topology of weak convergence.
## Main results
* Finite measures `μ` on `Ω` give rise to continuous linear functionals on the space of
bounded continuous nonnegative functions on `Ω` via integration:
`measure_theory.finite_measure.to_weak_dual_bcnn : finite_measure Ω → (weak_dual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0))`
* `measure_theory.finite_measure.tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto`: Convergence of finite
measures is characterized by the convergence of integrals of all bounded continuous functions.
This shows that the chosen definition of topology coincides with the common textbook definition
of weak convergence of measures. A similar characterization by the convergence of integrals (in
the `measure_theory.lintegral` sense) of all bounded continuous nonnegative functions is
`measure_theory.finite_measure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto`.
## Implementation notes
The topology of weak convergence of finite Borel measures is defined using a mapping from
`measure_theory.finite_measure Ω` to `weak_dual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)`, inheriting the topology from the
latter.
The implementation of `measure_theory.finite_measure Ω` and is directly as a subtype of
`measure_theory.measure Ω`, and the coercion to a function is the composition `ennreal.to_nnreal`
and the coercion to function of `measure_theory.measure Ω`. Another alternative would have been to
use a bijection with `measure_theory.vector_measure Ω ℝ≥0` as an intermediate step. Some
considerations:
* Potential advantages of using the `nnreal`-valued vector measure alternative:
* The coercion to function would avoid need to compose with `ennreal.to_nnreal`, the
`nnreal`-valued API could be more directly available.
* Potential drawbacks of the vector measure alternative:
* The coercion to function would lose monotonicity, as non-measurable sets would be defined to
have measure 0.
* No integration theory directly. E.g., the topology definition requires
`measure_theory.lintegral` w.r.t. a coercion to `measure_theory.measure Ω` in any case.
## References
* [Billingsley, *Convergence of probability measures*][billingsley1999]
## Tags
weak convergence of measures, finite measure
-/
noncomputable theory
open measure_theory
open set
open filter
open bounded_continuous_function
open_locale topology ennreal nnreal bounded_continuous_function
namespace measure_theory
namespace finite_measure
section finite_measure
/-! ### Finite measures
In this section we define the `Type` of `finite_measure Ω`, when `Ω` is a measurable space. Finite
measures on `Ω` are a module over `ℝ≥0`.
If `Ω` is moreover a topological space and the sigma algebra on `Ω` is finer than the Borel sigma
algebra (i.e. `[opens_measurable_space Ω]`), then `finite_measure Ω` is equipped with the topology
of weak convergence of measures. This is implemented by defining a pairing of finite measures `μ`
on `Ω` with continuous bounded nonnegative functions `f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0` via integration, and using the
associated weak topology (essentially the weak-star topology on the dual of `Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0`).
-/
variables {Ω : Type*} [measurable_space Ω]
/-- Finite measures are defined as the subtype of measures that have the property of being finite
measures (i.e., their total mass is finite). -/
def _root_.measure_theory.finite_measure (Ω : Type*) [measurable_space Ω] : Type* :=
{μ : measure Ω // is_finite_measure μ}
/-- A finite measure can be interpreted as a measure. -/
instance : has_coe (finite_measure Ω) (measure_theory.measure Ω) := coe_subtype
instance is_finite_measure (μ : finite_measure Ω) :
is_finite_measure (μ : measure Ω) := μ.prop
instance : has_coe_to_fun (finite_measure Ω) (λ _, set Ω → ℝ≥0) :=
⟨λ μ s, (μ s).to_nnreal⟩
lemma coe_fn_eq_to_nnreal_coe_fn_to_measure (ν : finite_measure Ω) :
(ν : set Ω → ℝ≥0) = λ s, ((ν : measure Ω) s).to_nnreal := rfl
@[simp] lemma ennreal_coe_fn_eq_coe_fn_to_measure (ν : finite_measure Ω) (s : set Ω) :
(ν s : ℝ≥0∞) = (ν : measure Ω) s := ennreal.coe_to_nnreal (measure_lt_top ↑ν s).ne
@[simp] lemma val_eq_to_measure (ν : finite_measure Ω) : ν.val = (ν : measure Ω) := rfl
lemma coe_injective : function.injective (coe : finite_measure Ω → measure Ω) :=
subtype.coe_injective
lemma apply_mono (μ : finite_measure Ω) {s₁ s₂ : set Ω} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ :=
begin
change ((μ : measure Ω) s₁).to_nnreal ≤ ((μ : measure Ω) s₂).to_nnreal,
have key : (μ : measure Ω) s₁ ≤ (μ : measure Ω) s₂ := (μ : measure Ω).mono h,
apply (ennreal.to_nnreal_le_to_nnreal (measure_ne_top _ s₁) (measure_ne_top _ s₂)).mpr key,
end
/-- The (total) mass of a finite measure `μ` is `μ univ`, i.e., the cast to `nnreal` of
`(μ : measure Ω) univ`. -/
def mass (μ : finite_measure Ω) : ℝ≥0 := μ univ
@[simp] lemma ennreal_mass {μ : finite_measure Ω} :
(μ.mass : ℝ≥0∞) = (μ : measure Ω) univ := ennreal_coe_fn_eq_coe_fn_to_measure μ set.univ
instance has_zero : has_zero (finite_measure Ω) :=
{ zero := ⟨0, measure_theory.is_finite_measure_zero⟩ }
@[simp] lemma zero.mass : (0 : finite_measure Ω).mass = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mass_zero_iff (μ : finite_measure Ω) : μ.mass = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ μ_mass, _, (λ hμ, by simp only [hμ, zero.mass])⟩,
ext1,
apply measure.measure_univ_eq_zero.mp,
rwa [← ennreal_mass, ennreal.coe_eq_zero],
end
lemma mass_nonzero_iff (μ : finite_measure Ω) : μ.mass ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
begin
rw not_iff_not,
exact finite_measure.mass_zero_iff μ,
end
@[ext] lemma eq_of_forall_measure_apply_eq (μ ν : finite_measure Ω)
(h : ∀ (s : set Ω), measurable_set s → (μ : measure Ω) s = (ν : measure Ω) s) :
μ = ν :=
by { ext1, ext1 s s_mble, exact h s s_mble, }
lemma eq_of_forall_apply_eq (μ ν : finite_measure Ω)
(h : ∀ (s : set Ω), measurable_set s → μ s = ν s) :
μ = ν :=
begin
ext1 s s_mble,
simpa [ennreal_coe_fn_eq_coe_fn_to_measure] using congr_arg (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) (h s s_mble),
end
instance : inhabited (finite_measure Ω) := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_add (finite_measure Ω) :=
{ add := λ μ ν, ⟨μ + ν, measure_theory.is_finite_measure_add⟩ }
variables {R : Type*} [has_smul R ℝ≥0] [has_smul R ℝ≥0∞] [is_scalar_tower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞]
[is_scalar_tower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance : has_smul R (finite_measure Ω) :=
{ smul := λ (c : R) μ, ⟨c • μ, measure_theory.is_finite_measure_smul_of_nnreal_tower⟩, }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : (coe : finite_measure Ω → measure Ω) 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (μ ν : finite_measure Ω) : ↑(μ + ν) = (↑μ + ↑ν : measure Ω) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_smul (c : R) (μ : finite_measure Ω) :
↑(c • μ) = (c • ↑μ : measure Ω) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fn_zero :
(⇑(0 : finite_measure Ω) : set Ω → ℝ≥0) = (0 : set Ω → ℝ≥0) := by { funext, refl, }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fn_add (μ ν : finite_measure Ω) :
(⇑(μ + ν) : set Ω → ℝ≥0) = (⇑μ + ⇑ν : set Ω → ℝ≥0) :=
by { funext, simp [← ennreal.coe_eq_coe], }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fn_smul [is_scalar_tower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] (c : R) (μ : finite_measure Ω) :
(⇑(c • μ) : set Ω → ℝ≥0) = c • (⇑μ : set Ω → ℝ≥0) :=
by { funext, simp [← ennreal.coe_eq_coe, ennreal.coe_smul], }
instance : add_comm_monoid (finite_measure Ω) :=
coe_injective.add_comm_monoid coe coe_zero coe_add (λ _ _, coe_smul _ _)
/-- Coercion is an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps]
def coe_add_monoid_hom : finite_measure Ω →+ measure Ω :=
{ to_fun := coe, map_zero' := coe_zero, map_add' := coe_add }
instance {Ω : Type*} [measurable_space Ω] : module ℝ≥0 (finite_measure Ω) :=
function.injective.module _ coe_add_monoid_hom coe_injective coe_smul
@[simp] lemma coe_fn_smul_apply [is_scalar_tower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0]
(c : R) (μ : finite_measure Ω) (s : set Ω) :
(c • μ) s = c • (μ s) :=
by { simp only [coe_fn_smul, pi.smul_apply], }
/-- Restrict a finite measure μ to a set A. -/
def restrict (μ : finite_measure Ω) (A : set Ω) : finite_measure Ω :=
{ val := (μ : measure Ω).restrict A,
property := measure_theory.is_finite_measure_restrict μ A, }
lemma restrict_measure_eq (μ : finite_measure Ω) (A : set Ω) :
(μ.restrict A : measure Ω) = (μ : measure Ω).restrict A := rfl
lemma restrict_apply_measure (μ : finite_measure Ω) (A : set Ω)
{s : set Ω} (s_mble : measurable_set s) :
(μ.restrict A : measure Ω) s = (μ : measure Ω) (s ∩ A) :=
measure.restrict_apply s_mble
lemma restrict_apply (μ : finite_measure Ω) (A : set Ω)
{s : set Ω} (s_mble : measurable_set s) :
(μ.restrict A) s = μ (s ∩ A) :=
begin
apply congr_arg ennreal.to_nnreal,
exact measure.restrict_apply s_mble,
end
lemma restrict_mass (μ : finite_measure Ω) (A : set Ω) :
(μ.restrict A).mass = μ A :=
by simp only [mass, restrict_apply μ A measurable_set.univ, univ_inter]
lemma restrict_eq_zero_iff (μ : finite_measure Ω) (A : set Ω) :
μ.restrict A = 0 ↔ μ A = 0 :=
by rw [← mass_zero_iff, restrict_mass]
lemma restrict_nonzero_iff (μ : finite_measure Ω) (A : set Ω) :
μ.restrict A ≠ 0 ↔ μ A ≠ 0 :=
by rw [← mass_nonzero_iff, restrict_mass]
variables [topological_space Ω]
/-- The pairing of a finite (Borel) measure `μ` with a nonnegative bounded continuous
function is obtained by (Lebesgue) integrating the (test) function against the measure.
This is `finite_measure.test_against_nn`. -/
def test_against_nn (μ : finite_measure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0 :=
(∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : measure Ω)).to_nnreal
lemma _root_.bounded_continuous_function.nnreal.to_ennreal_comp_measurable {Ω : Type*}
[topological_space Ω] [measurable_space Ω] [opens_measurable_space Ω] (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
measurable (λ ω, (f ω : ℝ≥0∞)) :=
measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal.comp f.continuous.measurable
lemma _root_.measure_theory.lintegral_lt_top_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal
(μ : measure Ω) [is_finite_measure μ] (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂μ < ∞ :=
begin
apply is_finite_measure.lintegral_lt_top_of_bounded_to_ennreal,
use nndist f 0,
intros x,
have key := bounded_continuous_function.nnreal.upper_bound f x,
rw ennreal.coe_le_coe,
have eq : nndist f 0 = ⟨dist f 0, dist_nonneg⟩,
{ ext,
simp only [real.coe_to_nnreal', max_eq_left_iff, subtype.coe_mk, coe_nndist], },
rwa eq at key,
end
@[simp] lemma test_against_nn_coe_eq {μ : finite_measure Ω} {f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} :
(μ.test_against_nn f : ℝ≥0∞) = ∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : measure Ω) :=
ennreal.coe_to_nnreal (lintegral_lt_top_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal _ f).ne
lemma test_against_nn_const (μ : finite_measure Ω) (c : ℝ≥0) :
μ.test_against_nn (bounded_continuous_function.const Ω c) = c * μ.mass :=
by simp [← ennreal.coe_eq_coe]
lemma test_against_nn_mono (μ : finite_measure Ω)
{f g : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} (f_le_g : (f : Ω → ℝ≥0) ≤ g) :
μ.test_against_nn f ≤ μ.test_against_nn g :=
begin
simp only [←ennreal.coe_le_coe, test_against_nn_coe_eq],
exact lintegral_mono (λ ω, ennreal.coe_mono (f_le_g ω)),
end
@[simp] lemma test_against_nn_zero (μ : finite_measure Ω) : μ.test_against_nn 0 = 0 :=
by simpa only [zero_mul] using μ.test_against_nn_const 0
@[simp] lemma test_against_nn_one (μ : finite_measure Ω) : μ.test_against_nn 1 = μ.mass :=
begin
simp only [test_against_nn, coe_one, pi.one_apply, ennreal.coe_one, lintegral_one],
refl,
end
@[simp] lemma zero.test_against_nn_apply (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
(0 : finite_measure Ω).test_against_nn f = 0 :=
by simp only [test_against_nn, coe_zero, lintegral_zero_measure, ennreal.zero_to_nnreal]
lemma zero.test_against_nn : (0 : finite_measure Ω).test_against_nn = 0 :=
by { funext, simp only [zero.test_against_nn_apply, pi.zero_apply], }
@[simp] lemma smul_test_against_nn_apply (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : finite_measure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
(c • μ).test_against_nn f = c • (μ.test_against_nn f) :=
by simp only [test_against_nn, coe_smul, smul_eq_mul, ← ennreal.smul_to_nnreal,
ennreal.smul_def, lintegral_smul_measure]
variables [opens_measurable_space Ω]
lemma test_against_nn_add (μ : finite_measure Ω) (f₁ f₂ : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.test_against_nn (f₁ + f₂) = μ.test_against_nn f₁ + μ.test_against_nn f₂ :=
begin
simp only [←ennreal.coe_eq_coe, bounded_continuous_function.coe_add, ennreal.coe_add,
pi.add_apply, test_against_nn_coe_eq],
exact lintegral_add_left (bounded_continuous_function.nnreal.to_ennreal_comp_measurable _) _
end
lemma test_against_nn_smul [is_scalar_tower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] [pseudo_metric_space R] [has_zero R]
[has_bounded_smul R ℝ≥0]
(μ : finite_measure Ω) (c : R) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.test_against_nn (c • f) = c • μ.test_against_nn f :=
begin
simp only [←ennreal.coe_eq_coe, bounded_continuous_function.coe_smul,
test_against_nn_coe_eq, ennreal.coe_smul],
simp_rw [←smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞ c (f _ : ℝ≥0∞), ←smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞ c (lintegral _ _ : ℝ≥0∞),
smul_eq_mul],
exact @lintegral_const_mul _ _ (μ : measure Ω) (c • 1) _
(bounded_continuous_function.nnreal.to_ennreal_comp_measurable f),
end
lemma test_against_nn_lipschitz_estimate (μ : finite_measure Ω) (f g : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.test_against_nn f ≤ μ.test_against_nn g + (nndist f g) * μ.mass :=
begin
simp only [←μ.test_against_nn_const (nndist f g), ←test_against_nn_add, ←ennreal.coe_le_coe,
bounded_continuous_function.coe_add, const_apply, ennreal.coe_add, pi.add_apply,
coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist, test_against_nn_coe_eq],
apply lintegral_mono,
have le_dist : ∀ ω, dist (f ω) (g ω) ≤ nndist f g :=
bounded_continuous_function.dist_coe_le_dist,
intros ω,
have le' : f ω ≤ g ω + nndist f g,
{ apply (nnreal.le_add_nndist (f ω) (g ω)).trans,
rw add_le_add_iff_left,
exact dist_le_coe.mp (le_dist ω), },
have le : (f ω : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (g ω : ℝ≥0∞) + (nndist f g),
by { rw ←ennreal.coe_add, exact ennreal.coe_mono le', },
rwa [coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist] at le,
end
lemma test_against_nn_lipschitz (μ : finite_measure Ω) :
lipschitz_with μ.mass (λ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0), μ.test_against_nn f) :=
begin
rw lipschitz_with_iff_dist_le_mul,
intros f₁ f₂,
suffices : abs (μ.test_against_nn f₁ - μ.test_against_nn f₂ : ℝ) ≤ μ.mass * (dist f₁ f₂),
{ rwa nnreal.dist_eq, },
apply abs_le.mpr,
split,
{ have key' := μ.test_against_nn_lipschitz_estimate f₂ f₁,
rw mul_comm at key',
suffices : ↑(μ.test_against_nn f₂) ≤ ↑(μ.test_against_nn f₁) + ↑(μ.mass) * dist f₁ f₂,
{ linarith, },
have key := nnreal.coe_mono key',
rwa [nnreal.coe_add, nnreal.coe_mul, nndist_comm] at key, },
{ have key' := μ.test_against_nn_lipschitz_estimate f₁ f₂,
rw mul_comm at key',
suffices : ↑(μ.test_against_nn f₁) ≤ ↑(μ.test_against_nn f₂) + ↑(μ.mass) * dist f₁ f₂,
{ linarith, },
have key := nnreal.coe_mono key',
rwa [nnreal.coe_add, nnreal.coe_mul] at key, },
end
/-- Finite measures yield elements of the `weak_dual` of bounded continuous nonnegative
functions via `measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn`, i.e., integration. -/
def to_weak_dual_bcnn (μ : finite_measure Ω) :
weak_dual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, μ.test_against_nn f,
map_add' := test_against_nn_add μ,
map_smul' := test_against_nn_smul μ,
cont := μ.test_against_nn_lipschitz.continuous, }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_weak_dual_bcnn (μ : finite_measure Ω) :
⇑μ.to_weak_dual_bcnn = μ.test_against_nn := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_weak_dual_bcnn_apply (μ : finite_measure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.to_weak_dual_bcnn f = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ : measure Ω)).to_nnreal := rfl
/-- The topology of weak convergence on `measure_theory.finite_measure Ω` is inherited (induced)
from the weak-* topology on `weak_dual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)` via the function
`measure_theory.finite_measure.to_weak_dual_bcnn`. -/
instance : topological_space (finite_measure Ω) :=
topological_space.induced to_weak_dual_bcnn infer_instance
lemma to_weak_dual_bcnn_continuous :
continuous (@to_weak_dual_bcnn Ω _ _ _) :=
continuous_induced_dom
/- Integration of (nonnegative bounded continuous) test functions against finite Borel measures
depends continuously on the measure. -/
lemma continuous_test_against_nn_eval (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
continuous (λ (μ : finite_measure Ω), μ.test_against_nn f) :=
(by apply (weak_bilin.eval_continuous _ _).comp to_weak_dual_bcnn_continuous :
continuous ((λ φ : weak_dual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0), φ f) ∘ to_weak_dual_bcnn))
/-- The total mass of a finite measure depends continuously on the measure. -/
lemma continuous_mass : continuous (λ (μ : finite_measure Ω), μ.mass) :=
by { simp_rw ←test_against_nn_one, exact continuous_test_against_nn_eval 1, }
/-- Convergence of finite measures implies the convergence of their total masses. -/
lemma _root_.filter.tendsto.mass {γ : Type*} {F : filter γ}
{μs : γ → finite_measure Ω} {μ : finite_measure Ω} (h : tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ)) :
tendsto (λ i, (μs i).mass) F (𝓝 μ.mass) :=
(continuous_mass.tendsto μ).comp h
lemma tendsto_iff_weak_star_tendsto {γ : Type*} {F : filter γ}
{μs : γ → finite_measure Ω} {μ : finite_measure Ω} :
tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔ tendsto (λ i, (μs(i)).to_weak_dual_bcnn) F (𝓝 μ.to_weak_dual_bcnn) :=
inducing.tendsto_nhds_iff ⟨rfl⟩
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_to_weak_dual_bcnn_tendsto
{γ : Type*} {F : filter γ} {μs : γ → finite_measure Ω} {μ : finite_measure Ω} :
tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔
∀ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0), tendsto (λ i, (μs i).to_weak_dual_bcnn f) F (𝓝 (μ.to_weak_dual_bcnn f)) :=
by { rw [tendsto_iff_weak_star_tendsto, tendsto_iff_forall_eval_tendsto_top_dual_pairing], refl, }
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_test_against_nn_tendsto
{γ : Type*} {F : filter γ} {μs : γ → finite_measure Ω} {μ : finite_measure Ω} :
tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔
∀ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0), tendsto (λ i, (μs i).test_against_nn f) F (𝓝 (μ.test_against_nn f)) :=
by { rw finite_measure.tendsto_iff_forall_to_weak_dual_bcnn_tendsto, refl, }
/-- If the total masses of finite measures tend to zero, then the measures tend to
zero. This formulation concerns the associated functionals on bounded continuous
nonnegative test functions. See `finite_measure.tendsto_zero_of_tendsto_zero_mass` for
a formulation stating the weak convergence of measures. -/
lemma tendsto_zero_test_against_nn_of_tendsto_zero_mass
{γ : Type*} {F : filter γ} {μs : γ → finite_measure Ω}
(mass_lim : tendsto (λ i, (μs i).mass) F (𝓝 0)) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
tendsto (λ i, (μs i).test_against_nn f) F (𝓝 0) :=
begin
apply tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.mpr,
have obs := λ i, (μs i).test_against_nn_lipschitz_estimate f 0,
simp_rw [test_against_nn_zero, zero_add] at obs,
simp_rw (show ∀ i, dist ((μs i).test_against_nn f) 0 = (μs i).test_against_nn f,
by simp only [dist_nndist, nnreal.nndist_zero_eq_val', eq_self_iff_true,
implies_true_iff]),
refine squeeze_zero (λ i, nnreal.coe_nonneg _) obs _,
simp_rw nnreal.coe_mul,
have lim_pair : tendsto (λ i, (⟨nndist f 0, (μs i).mass⟩ : ℝ × ℝ)) F (𝓝 (⟨nndist f 0, 0⟩)),
{ refine (prod.tendsto_iff _ _).mpr ⟨tendsto_const_nhds, _⟩,
exact (nnreal.continuous_coe.tendsto 0).comp mass_lim, },
have key := tendsto_mul.comp lim_pair,
rwa mul_zero at key,
end
/-- If the total masses of finite measures tend to zero, then the measures tend to zero. -/
lemma tendsto_zero_of_tendsto_zero_mass {γ : Type*} {F : filter γ}
{μs : γ → finite_measure Ω} (mass_lim : tendsto (λ i, (μs i).mass) F (𝓝 0)) :
tendsto μs F (𝓝 0) :=
begin
rw tendsto_iff_forall_test_against_nn_tendsto,
intro f,
convert tendsto_zero_test_against_nn_of_tendsto_zero_mass mass_lim f,
rw [zero.test_against_nn_apply],
end
/-- A characterization of weak convergence in terms of integrals of bounded continuous
nonnegative functions. -/
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto {γ : Type*} {F : filter γ}
{μs : γ → finite_measure Ω} {μ : finite_measure Ω} :
tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔
∀ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0),
tendsto (λ i, (∫⁻ x, (f x) ∂(μs(i) : measure Ω))) F (𝓝 ((∫⁻ x, (f x) ∂(μ : measure Ω)))) :=
begin
rw tendsto_iff_forall_to_weak_dual_bcnn_tendsto,
simp_rw [to_weak_dual_bcnn_apply _ _, ←test_against_nn_coe_eq,
ennreal.tendsto_coe, ennreal.to_nnreal_coe],
end
end finite_measure -- section
section finite_measure_bounded_convergence
/-! ### Bounded convergence results for finite measures
This section is about bounded convergence theorems for finite measures.
-/
variables {Ω : Type*} [measurable_space Ω] [topological_space Ω] [opens_measurable_space Ω]
/-- A bounded convergence theorem for a finite measure:
If bounded continuous non-negative functions are uniformly bounded by a constant and tend to a
limit, then their integrals against the finite measure tend to the integral of the limit.
This formulation assumes:
* the functions tend to a limit along a countably generated filter;
* the limit is in the almost everywhere sense;
* boundedness holds almost everywhere;
* integration is `measure_theory.lintegral`, i.e., the functions and their integrals are
`ℝ≥0∞`-valued.
-/
lemma tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const {ι : Type*} {L : filter ι} [L.is_countably_generated]
(μ : measure Ω) [is_finite_measure μ] {fs : ι → (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)} {c : ℝ≥0}
(fs_le_const : ∀ᶠ i in L, ∀ᵐ (ω : Ω) ∂μ, fs i ω ≤ c) {f : Ω → ℝ≥0}
(fs_lim : ∀ᵐ (ω : Ω) ∂μ, tendsto (λ i, fs i ω) L (𝓝 (f ω))) :
tendsto (λ i, (∫⁻ ω, fs i ω ∂μ)) L (𝓝 (∫⁻ ω, (f ω) ∂μ)) :=
begin
simpa only using tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (λ _, c)
(eventually_of_forall ((λ i, (ennreal.continuous_coe.comp (fs i).continuous).measurable)))
_ ((@lintegral_const_lt_top _ _ μ _ _ (@ennreal.coe_ne_top c)).ne) _,
{ simpa only [ennreal.coe_le_coe] using fs_le_const, },
{ simpa only [ennreal.tendsto_coe] using fs_lim, },
end
/-- A bounded convergence theorem for a finite measure:
If a sequence of bounded continuous non-negative functions are uniformly bounded by a constant
and tend pointwise to a limit, then their integrals (`measure_theory.lintegral`) against the finite
measure tend to the integral of the limit.
A related result with more general assumptions is
`measure_theory.finite_measure.tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const`.
-/
lemma tendsto_lintegral_nn_of_le_const (μ : finite_measure Ω) {fs : ℕ → (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)} {c : ℝ≥0}
(fs_le_const : ∀ n ω, fs n ω ≤ c) {f : Ω → ℝ≥0}
(fs_lim : ∀ ω, tendsto (λ n, fs n ω) at_top (𝓝 (f ω))) :
tendsto (λ n, (∫⁻ ω, fs n ω ∂(μ : measure Ω))) at_top (𝓝 (∫⁻ ω, (f ω) ∂(μ : measure Ω))) :=
tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const μ
(eventually_of_forall (λ n, eventually_of_forall (fs_le_const n))) (eventually_of_forall fs_lim)
/-- A bounded convergence theorem for a finite measure:
If bounded continuous non-negative functions are uniformly bounded by a constant and tend to a
limit, then their integrals against the finite measure tend to the integral of the limit.
This formulation assumes:
* the functions tend to a limit along a countably generated filter;
* the limit is in the almost everywhere sense;
* boundedness holds almost everywhere;
* integration is the pairing against non-negative continuous test functions
(`measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn`).
A related result using `measure_theory.lintegral` for integration is
`measure_theory.finite_measure.tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const`.
-/
lemma tendsto_test_against_nn_filter_of_le_const {ι : Type*} {L : filter ι}
[L.is_countably_generated] {μ : finite_measure Ω} {fs : ι → (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)} {c : ℝ≥0}
(fs_le_const : ∀ᶠ i in L, ∀ᵐ (ω : Ω) ∂(μ : measure Ω), fs i ω ≤ c) {f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0}
(fs_lim : ∀ᵐ (ω : Ω) ∂(μ : measure Ω), tendsto (λ i, fs i ω) L (𝓝 (f ω))) :
tendsto (λ i, μ.test_against_nn (fs i)) L (𝓝 (μ.test_against_nn f)) :=
begin
apply (ennreal.tendsto_to_nnreal
(lintegral_lt_top_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal (μ : measure Ω) f).ne).comp,
exact tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const μ fs_le_const fs_lim,
end
/-- A bounded convergence theorem for a finite measure:
If a sequence of bounded continuous non-negative functions are uniformly bounded by a constant and
tend pointwise to a limit, then their integrals (`measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn`)
against the finite measure tend to the integral of the limit.
Related results:
* `measure_theory.finite_measure.tendsto_test_against_nn_filter_of_le_const`:
more general assumptions
* `measure_theory.finite_measure.tendsto_lintegral_nn_of_le_const`:
using `measure_theory.lintegral` for integration.
-/
lemma tendsto_test_against_nn_of_le_const {μ : finite_measure Ω}
{fs : ℕ → (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)} {c : ℝ≥0} (fs_le_const : ∀ n ω, fs n ω ≤ c) {f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0}
(fs_lim : ∀ ω, tendsto (λ n, fs n ω) at_top (𝓝 (f ω))) :
tendsto (λ n, μ.test_against_nn (fs n)) at_top (𝓝 (μ.test_against_nn f)) :=
tendsto_test_against_nn_filter_of_le_const
(eventually_of_forall (λ n, eventually_of_forall (fs_le_const n))) (eventually_of_forall fs_lim)
end finite_measure_bounded_convergence -- section
section finite_measure_convergence_by_bounded_continuous_functions
/-! ### Weak convergence of finite measures with bounded continuous real-valued functions
In this section we characterize the weak convergence of finite measures by the usual (defining)
condition that the integrals of all bounded continuous real-valued functions converge.
-/
variables {Ω : Type*} [measurable_space Ω] [topological_space Ω] [opens_measurable_space Ω]
lemma integrable_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal
(μ : measure Ω) [is_finite_measure μ] (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
integrable ((coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ ⇑f) μ :=
begin
refine ⟨(nnreal.continuous_coe.comp f.continuous).measurable.ae_strongly_measurable, _⟩,
simp only [has_finite_integral, nnreal.nnnorm_eq],
exact lintegral_lt_top_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal _ f,
end
lemma integrable_of_bounded_continuous_to_real
(μ : measure Ω) [is_finite_measure μ] (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ) :
integrable ⇑f μ :=
begin
refine ⟨f.continuous.measurable.ae_strongly_measurable, _⟩,
have aux : (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ ⇑f.nnnorm = (λ x, ‖f x‖),
{ ext ω,
simp only [function.comp_app, bounded_continuous_function.nnnorm_coe_fun_eq, coe_nnnorm], },
apply (has_finite_integral_iff_norm ⇑f).mpr,
rw ← of_real_integral_eq_lintegral_of_real,
{ exact ennreal.of_real_lt_top, },
{ exact aux ▸ integrable_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal μ f.nnnorm, },
{ exact eventually_of_forall (λ ω, norm_nonneg (f ω)), },
end
lemma _root_.bounded_continuous_function.integral_eq_integral_nnreal_part_sub
(μ : measure Ω) [is_finite_measure μ] (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ) :
∫ ω, f ω ∂μ = ∫ ω, f.nnreal_part ω ∂μ - ∫ ω, (-f).nnreal_part ω ∂μ :=
by simp only [f.self_eq_nnreal_part_sub_nnreal_part_neg,
pi.sub_apply, integral_sub, integrable_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal]
lemma lintegral_lt_top_of_bounded_continuous_to_real
{Ω : Type*} [measurable_space Ω] [topological_space Ω] (μ : measure Ω) [is_finite_measure μ]
(f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ) :
∫⁻ ω, ennreal.of_real (f ω) ∂μ < ∞ :=
lintegral_lt_top_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal _ f.nnreal_part
theorem tendsto_of_forall_integral_tendsto
{γ : Type*} {F : filter γ} {μs : γ → finite_measure Ω} {μ : finite_measure Ω}
(h : (∀ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ),
tendsto (λ i, (∫ x, (f x) ∂(μs i : measure Ω))) F (𝓝 ((∫ x, (f x) ∂(μ : measure Ω)))))) :
tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) :=
begin
apply (@tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto Ω _ _ _ γ F μs μ).mpr,
intro f,
have key := @ennreal.tendsto_to_real_iff _ F
_ (λ i, (lintegral_lt_top_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal (μs i : measure Ω) f).ne)
_ (lintegral_lt_top_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal (μ : measure Ω) f).ne,
simp only [ennreal.of_real_coe_nnreal] at key,
apply key.mp,
have lip : lipschitz_with 1 (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ), from isometry_subtype_coe.lipschitz,
set f₀ := bounded_continuous_function.comp _ lip f with def_f₀,
have f₀_eq : ⇑f₀ = (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ ⇑f, by refl,
have f₀_nn : 0 ≤ ⇑f₀, from λ _, by simp only [f₀_eq, pi.zero_apply, nnreal.zero_le_coe],
have f₀_ae_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[(μ : measure Ω)] ⇑f₀, from eventually_of_forall f₀_nn,
have f₀_ae_nns : ∀ i, 0 ≤ᵐ[(μs i : measure Ω)] ⇑f₀, from λ i, eventually_of_forall f₀_nn,
have aux := integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae f₀_ae_nn
f₀.continuous.measurable.ae_strongly_measurable,
have auxs := λ i, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (f₀_ae_nns i)
f₀.continuous.measurable.ae_strongly_measurable,
simp only [f₀_eq, ennreal.of_real_coe_nnreal] at aux auxs,
simpa only [←aux, ←auxs] using h f₀,
end
lemma _root_.bounded_continuous_function.nnreal.to_real_lintegral_eq_integral
(f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) (μ : measure Ω) :
(∫⁻ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ).to_real = (∫ x, f x ∂μ) :=
begin
rw integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _
(nnreal.continuous_coe.comp f.continuous).measurable.ae_strongly_measurable,
{ simp only [ennreal.of_real_coe_nnreal], },
{ apply eventually_of_forall,
simp only [pi.zero_apply, nnreal.zero_le_coe, implies_true_iff], },
end
/-- A characterization of weak convergence in terms of integrals of bounded continuous
real-valued functions. -/
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto
{γ : Type*} {F : filter γ} {μs : γ → finite_measure Ω} {μ : finite_measure Ω} :
tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔
∀ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ),
tendsto (λ i, (∫ x, (f x) ∂(μs i : measure Ω))) F (𝓝 ((∫ x, (f x) ∂(μ : measure Ω)))) :=
begin
refine ⟨_, tendsto_of_forall_integral_tendsto⟩,
rw tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto,
intros h f,
simp_rw bounded_continuous_function.integral_eq_integral_nnreal_part_sub,
set f_pos := f.nnreal_part with def_f_pos,
set f_neg := (-f).nnreal_part with def_f_neg,
have tends_pos := (ennreal.tendsto_to_real
((lintegral_lt_top_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal (μ : measure Ω) f_pos).ne)).comp (h f_pos),
have tends_neg := (ennreal.tendsto_to_real
((lintegral_lt_top_of_bounded_continuous_to_nnreal (μ : measure Ω) f_neg).ne)).comp (h f_neg),
have aux : ∀ (g : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0), ennreal.to_real ∘ (λ (i : γ), ∫⁻ (x : Ω), ↑(g x) ∂(μs i : measure Ω))
= λ (i : γ), (∫⁻ (x : Ω), ↑(g x) ∂(μs i : measure Ω)).to_real, from λ _, rfl,
simp_rw [aux, bounded_continuous_function.nnreal.to_real_lintegral_eq_integral]
at tends_pos tends_neg,
exact tendsto.sub tends_pos tends_neg,
end
end finite_measure_convergence_by_bounded_continuous_functions -- section
end finite_measure -- namespace
end measure_theory -- namespace
|
6e67e8671a8b2777be5cea0b5157fe170b1f255f | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/order/succ_pred/linear_locally_finite.lean | 39db9c91883a89af54f9943c3cb2d5326977c0dc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,520 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import order.locally_finite
import order.succ_pred.basic
import order.hom.basic
import data.countable.basic
import logic.encodable.basic
/-!
# Linear locally finite orders
We prove that a `linear_order` which is a `locally_finite_order` also verifies
* `succ_order`
* `pred_order`
* `is_succ_archimedean`
* `is_pred_archimedean`
* `countable`
Furthermore, we show that there is an `order_iso` between such an order and a subset of `ℤ`.
## Main definitions
* `to_Z i0 i`: in a linear order on which we can define predecessors and successors and which is
succ-archimedean, we can assign a unique integer `to_Z i0 i` to each element `i : ι` while
respecting the order, starting from `to_Z i0 i0 = 0`.
## Main results
Instances about linear locally finite orders:
* `linear_locally_finite_order.succ_order`: a linear locally finite order has a successor function.
* `linear_locally_finite_order.pred_order`: a linear locally finite order has a predecessor
function.
* `linear_locally_finite_order.is_succ_archimedean`: a linear locally finite order is
succ-archimedean.
* `linear_order.pred_archimedean_of_succ_archimedean`: a succ-archimedean linear order is also
pred-archimedean.
* `countable_of_linear_succ_pred_arch` : a succ-archimedean linear order is countable.
About `to_Z`:
* `order_iso_range_to_Z_of_linear_succ_pred_arch`: `to_Z` defines an `order_iso` between `ι` and its
range.
* `order_iso_nat_of_linear_succ_pred_arch`: if the order has a bot but no top, `to_Z` defines an
`order_iso` between `ι` and `ℕ`.
* `order_iso_int_of_linear_succ_pred_arch`: if the order has neither bot nor top, `to_Z` defines an
`order_iso` between `ι` and `ℤ`.
* `order_iso_range_of_linear_succ_pred_arch`: if the order has both a bot and a top, `to_Z` gives an
`order_iso` between `ι` and `finset.range ((to_Z ⊥ ⊤).to_nat + 1)`.
-/
open order
variables {ι : Type*} [linear_order ι]
namespace linear_locally_finite_order
/-- Successor in a linear order. This defines a true successor only when `i` is isolated from above,
i.e. when `i` is not the greatest lower bound of `(i, ∞)`. -/
noncomputable def succ_fn (i : ι) : ι := (exists_glb_Ioi i).some
lemma succ_fn_spec (i : ι) : is_glb (set.Ioi i) (succ_fn i) := (exists_glb_Ioi i).some_spec
lemma le_succ_fn (i : ι) : i ≤ succ_fn i :=
by { rw [le_is_glb_iff (succ_fn_spec i), mem_lower_bounds], exact λ x hx, (le_of_lt hx), }
lemma is_glb_Ioc_of_is_glb_Ioi {i j k : ι} (hij_lt : i < j) (h : is_glb (set.Ioi i) k) :
is_glb (set.Ioc i j) k :=
begin
simp_rw [is_glb, is_greatest, mem_upper_bounds, mem_lower_bounds] at h ⊢,
refine ⟨λ x hx, h.1 x hx.1, λ x hx, h.2 x _⟩,
intros y hy,
cases le_or_lt y j with h_le h_lt,
{ exact hx y ⟨hy, h_le⟩, },
{ exact le_trans (hx j ⟨hij_lt, le_rfl⟩) h_lt.le, },
end
lemma is_max_of_succ_fn_le [locally_finite_order ι] (i : ι) (hi : succ_fn i ≤ i) : is_max i :=
begin
refine λ j hij, not_lt.mp (λ hij_lt, _),
have h_succ_fn_eq : succ_fn i = i := le_antisymm hi (le_succ_fn i),
have h_glb : is_glb (finset.Ioc i j : set ι) i,
{ rw finset.coe_Ioc,
have h := succ_fn_spec i,
rw h_succ_fn_eq at h,
exact is_glb_Ioc_of_is_glb_Ioi hij_lt h, },
have hi_mem : i ∈ finset.Ioc i j,
{ refine finset.is_glb_mem _ h_glb _,
exact ⟨_, finset.mem_Ioc.mpr ⟨hij_lt, le_rfl⟩⟩, },
rw finset.mem_Ioc at hi_mem,
exact lt_irrefl i hi_mem.1,
end
lemma succ_fn_le_of_lt (i j : ι) (hij : i < j) : succ_fn i ≤ j :=
by { have h := succ_fn_spec i, rw [is_glb, is_greatest, mem_lower_bounds] at h, exact h.1 j hij, }
lemma le_of_lt_succ_fn (j i : ι) (hij : j < succ_fn i) : j ≤ i :=
begin
rw lt_is_glb_iff (succ_fn_spec i) at hij,
obtain ⟨k, hk_lb, hk⟩ := hij,
rw mem_lower_bounds at hk_lb,
exact not_lt.mp (λ hi_lt_j, not_le.mpr hk (hk_lb j hi_lt_j)),
end
@[priority 100]
noncomputable instance [locally_finite_order ι] : succ_order ι :=
{ succ := succ_fn,
le_succ := le_succ_fn,
max_of_succ_le := is_max_of_succ_fn_le,
succ_le_of_lt := succ_fn_le_of_lt,
le_of_lt_succ := le_of_lt_succ_fn, }
@[priority 100]
noncomputable instance [locally_finite_order ι] : pred_order ι :=
@order_dual.pred_order ιᵒᵈ _ _
end linear_locally_finite_order
@[priority 100]
instance linear_locally_finite_order.is_succ_archimedean [locally_finite_order ι] :
is_succ_archimedean ι :=
{ exists_succ_iterate_of_le := λ i j hij,
begin
rw le_iff_lt_or_eq at hij,
cases hij,
swap, { refine ⟨0, _⟩, simpa only [function.iterate_zero, id.def] using hij, },
by_contra h,
push_neg at h,
have h_lt : ∀ n, succ^[n] i < j,
{ intro n,
induction n with n hn,
{ simpa only [function.iterate_zero, id.def] using hij, },
{ refine lt_of_le_of_ne _ (h _),
rw [function.iterate_succ', function.comp_app],
exact succ_le_of_lt hn, }, },
have h_mem : ∀ n, succ^[n] i ∈ finset.Icc i j,
from λ n, finset.mem_Icc.mpr ⟨le_succ_iterate n i, (h_lt n).le⟩,
obtain ⟨n, m, hnm, h_eq⟩ : ∃ n m, n < m ∧ (succ^[n] i = (succ^[m] i)),
{ let f : ℕ → finset.Icc i j := λ n, ⟨succ^[n] i, h_mem n⟩,
obtain ⟨n, m, hnm_ne, hfnm⟩ : ∃ n m, n ≠ m ∧ f n = f m,
from finite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_infinite f,
have hnm_eq : (succ^[n] i) = (succ^[m] i),
{ simpa only [subtype.mk_eq_mk] using hfnm, },
cases le_total n m with h_le h_le,
{ exact ⟨n, m, lt_of_le_of_ne h_le hnm_ne, hnm_eq⟩, },
{ exact ⟨m, n, lt_of_le_of_ne h_le hnm_ne.symm, hnm_eq.symm ⟩, }, },
have h_max : is_max (succ^[n] i) := is_max_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne h_eq hnm.ne,
exact not_le.mpr (h_lt n) (h_max (h_lt n).le),
end }
@[priority 100]
instance linear_order.pred_archimedean_of_succ_archimedean [succ_order ι] [pred_order ι]
[is_succ_archimedean ι] :
is_pred_archimedean ι :=
{ exists_pred_iterate_of_le := λ i j hij,
begin
have h_exists := exists_succ_iterate_of_le hij,
obtain ⟨n, hn_eq, hn_lt_ne⟩ : ∃ n, (succ^[n] i = j) ∧ (∀ m < n, succ^[m] i ≠ j),
from ⟨nat.find h_exists, nat.find_spec h_exists, λ m hmn, nat.find_min h_exists hmn⟩,
refine ⟨n, _⟩,
rw ← hn_eq,
induction n with n hn,
{ simp only [function.iterate_zero, id.def], },
{ rw pred_succ_iterate_of_not_is_max,
rw [nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero],
suffices : (succ^[n] i) < (succ^[n.succ] i), from not_is_max_of_lt this,
refine lt_of_le_of_ne _ _,
{ rw function.iterate_succ',
exact le_succ _, },
{ rw hn_eq,
exact hn_lt_ne _ (nat.lt_succ_self n), }, },
end }
section to_Z
variables [succ_order ι] [is_succ_archimedean ι] [pred_order ι] {i0 i : ι}
/-- `to_Z` numbers elements of `ι` according to their order, starting from `i0`. We prove in
`order_iso_range_to_Z_of_linear_succ_pred_arch` that this defines an `order_iso` between `ι` and
the range of `to_Z`. -/
def to_Z (i0 i : ι) : ℤ :=
dite (i0 ≤ i) (λ hi, nat.find (exists_succ_iterate_of_le hi))
(λ hi, - nat.find (exists_pred_iterate_of_le (not_le.mp hi).le))
lemma to_Z_of_ge (hi : i0 ≤ i) : to_Z i0 i = nat.find (exists_succ_iterate_of_le hi) := dif_pos hi
lemma to_Z_of_lt (hi : i < i0) : to_Z i0 i = - nat.find (exists_pred_iterate_of_le hi.le) :=
dif_neg (not_le.mpr hi)
@[simp] lemma to_Z_of_eq : to_Z i0 i0 = 0 :=
begin
rw to_Z_of_ge le_rfl,
norm_cast,
refine le_antisymm (nat.find_le _) (zero_le _),
rw [function.iterate_zero, id.def],
end
lemma iterate_succ_to_Z (i : ι) (hi : i0 ≤ i) : succ^[(to_Z i0 i).to_nat] i0 = i :=
by { rw [to_Z_of_ge hi, int.to_nat_coe_nat], exact nat.find_spec (exists_succ_iterate_of_le hi), }
lemma iterate_pred_to_Z (i : ι) (hi : i < i0) : pred^[(- to_Z i0 i).to_nat] i0 = i :=
begin
rw [to_Z_of_lt hi, neg_neg, int.to_nat_coe_nat],
exact nat.find_spec (exists_pred_iterate_of_le hi.le),
end
lemma to_Z_nonneg (hi : i0 ≤ i) : 0 ≤ to_Z i0 i :=
by { rw to_Z_of_ge hi, exact nat.cast_nonneg _, }
lemma to_Z_neg (hi : i < i0) : to_Z i0 i < 0 :=
begin
refine lt_of_le_of_ne _ _,
{ rw [to_Z_of_lt hi, neg_nonpos], exact nat.cast_nonneg _, },
{ by_contra,
have h_eq := iterate_pred_to_Z i hi,
rw [← h_eq, h] at hi,
simpa only [neg_zero, int.to_nat_zero, function.iterate_zero, id.def, lt_self_iff_false]
using hi, },
end
lemma to_Z_iterate_succ_le (n : ℕ) : to_Z i0 (succ^[n] i0) ≤ n :=
begin
rw to_Z_of_ge (le_succ_iterate _ _),
norm_cast,
exact nat.find_min' (exists_succ_iterate_of_le _) rfl,
end
lemma to_Z_iterate_pred_ge (n : ℕ) : -(n : ℤ) ≤ to_Z i0 (pred^[n] i0) :=
begin
cases le_or_lt i0 (pred^[n] i0) with h h,
{ have h_eq : (pred^[n] i0) = i0 := le_antisymm (pred_iterate_le _ _) h,
rw [h_eq, to_Z_of_eq],
simp only [right.neg_nonpos_iff, nat.cast_nonneg],},
{ rw [to_Z_of_lt h, neg_le_neg_iff],
norm_cast,
exact nat.find_min' (exists_pred_iterate_of_le _) rfl, },
end
lemma to_Z_iterate_succ_of_not_is_max (n : ℕ) (hn : ¬ is_max (succ^[n] i0)) :
to_Z i0 (succ^[n] i0) = n :=
begin
let m := (to_Z i0 (succ^[n] i0)).to_nat,
have h_eq : (succ^[m] i0) = (succ^[n] i0) := iterate_succ_to_Z _ (le_succ_iterate _ _),
by_cases hmn : m = n,
{ nth_rewrite 1 ← hmn,
simp_rw [m],
rw [int.to_nat_eq_max, to_Z_of_ge (le_succ_iterate _ _), max_eq_left],
exact nat.cast_nonneg _, },
suffices : is_max (succ^[n] i0), from absurd this hn,
exact is_max_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne h_eq.symm (ne.symm hmn),
end
lemma to_Z_iterate_pred_of_not_is_min (n : ℕ) (hn : ¬ is_min (pred^[n] i0)) :
to_Z i0 (pred^[n] i0) = -n :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp only [function.iterate_zero, id.def, to_Z_of_eq, nat.cast_zero, neg_zero], },
have : (pred^[n.succ] i0) < i0,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_ne (pred_iterate_le _ _) (λ h_pred_iterate_eq, hn _),
have h_pred_eq_pred : (pred^[n.succ] i0) = (pred^[0] i0),
{ rwa [function.iterate_zero, id.def], },
exact is_min_iterate_pred_of_eq_of_ne h_pred_eq_pred (nat.succ_ne_zero n), },
let m := (- to_Z i0 (pred^[n.succ] i0)).to_nat,
have h_eq : (pred^[m] i0) = (pred^[n.succ] i0) := iterate_pred_to_Z _ this,
by_cases hmn : m = n.succ,
{ nth_rewrite 1 ← hmn,
simp_rw [m],
rw [int.to_nat_eq_max, to_Z_of_lt this, max_eq_left, neg_neg],
rw neg_neg,
exact nat.cast_nonneg _, },
{ suffices : is_min (pred^[n.succ] i0), from absurd this hn,
exact is_min_iterate_pred_of_eq_of_ne h_eq.symm (ne.symm hmn), },
end
lemma le_of_to_Z_le {j : ι} (h_le : to_Z i0 i ≤ to_Z i0 j) : i ≤ j :=
begin
cases le_or_lt i0 i with hi hi; cases le_or_lt i0 j with hj hj,
{ rw [← iterate_succ_to_Z i hi, ← iterate_succ_to_Z j hj],
exact monotone.monotone_iterate_of_le_map succ_mono (le_succ _) (int.to_nat_le_to_nat h_le), },
{ exact absurd ((to_Z_neg hj).trans_le (to_Z_nonneg hi)) (not_lt.mpr h_le), },
{ exact hi.le.trans hj, },
{ rw [← iterate_pred_to_Z i hi, ← iterate_pred_to_Z j hj],
refine monotone.antitone_iterate_of_map_le pred_mono (pred_le _) (int.to_nat_le_to_nat _),
exact neg_le_neg h_le, },
end
lemma to_Z_mono {i j : ι} (h_le : i ≤ j) : to_Z i0 i ≤ to_Z i0 j :=
begin
by_cases hi_max : is_max i,
{ rw le_antisymm h_le (hi_max h_le), },
by_cases hj_min : is_min j,
{ rw le_antisymm h_le (hj_min h_le), },
cases le_or_lt i0 i with hi hi; cases le_or_lt i0 j with hj hj,
{ let m := nat.find (exists_succ_iterate_of_le h_le),
have hm : (succ^[m] i = j) := nat.find_spec (exists_succ_iterate_of_le h_le),
have hj_eq : j = (succ^[(to_Z i0 i).to_nat + m] i0),
{ rw [← hm, add_comm],
nth_rewrite 0 ← iterate_succ_to_Z i hi,
rw function.iterate_add, },
by_contra h,
push_neg at h,
by_cases hm0 : m = 0,
{ rw [hm0, function.iterate_zero, id.def] at hm,
rw hm at h,
exact lt_irrefl _ h, },
refine hi_max (max_of_succ_le (le_trans _ (@le_of_to_Z_le _ _ _ _ _ i0 _ _ _))),
{ exact j, },
{ have h_succ_le : (succ^[(to_Z i0 i).to_nat + 1] i0) ≤ j,
{ rw hj_eq,
refine monotone.monotone_iterate_of_le_map succ_mono (le_succ i0) (add_le_add_left _ _),
exact nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm0, },
rwa [function.iterate_succ', function.comp_app, iterate_succ_to_Z i hi] at h_succ_le, },
{ exact h.le, }, },
{ exact absurd h_le (not_le.mpr (hj.trans_le hi)), },
{ exact (to_Z_neg hi).le.trans (to_Z_nonneg hj), },
{ let m := nat.find (exists_pred_iterate_of_le h_le),
have hm : (pred^[m] j = i) := nat.find_spec (exists_pred_iterate_of_le h_le),
have hj_eq : i = (pred^[(-to_Z i0 j).to_nat + m] i0),
{ rw [← hm, add_comm],
nth_rewrite 0 ← iterate_pred_to_Z j hj,
rw function.iterate_add, },
by_contra h,
push_neg at h,
by_cases hm0 : m = 0,
{ rw [hm0, function.iterate_zero, id.def] at hm,
rw hm at h,
exact lt_irrefl _ h, },
refine hj_min (min_of_le_pred _),
refine (@le_of_to_Z_le _ _ _ _ _ i0 _ _ _).trans _,
{ exact i, },
{ exact h.le, },
{ have h_le_pred : i ≤ (pred^[(-to_Z i0 j).to_nat + 1] i0),
{ rw hj_eq,
refine monotone.antitone_iterate_of_map_le pred_mono (pred_le i0) (add_le_add_left _ _),
exact nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm0, },
rwa [function.iterate_succ', function.comp_app, iterate_pred_to_Z j hj]
at h_le_pred, }, },
end
lemma to_Z_le_iff (i j : ι) : to_Z i0 i ≤ to_Z i0 j ↔ i ≤ j :=
⟨le_of_to_Z_le, to_Z_mono⟩
lemma to_Z_iterate_succ [no_max_order ι] (n : ℕ) : to_Z i0 (succ^[n] i0) = n :=
to_Z_iterate_succ_of_not_is_max n (not_is_max _)
lemma to_Z_iterate_pred [no_min_order ι] (n : ℕ) : to_Z i0 (pred^[n] i0) = -n :=
to_Z_iterate_pred_of_not_is_min n (not_is_min _)
lemma injective_to_Z : function.injective (to_Z i0) :=
λ i j hij, le_antisymm (le_of_to_Z_le hij.le) (le_of_to_Z_le hij.symm.le)
end to_Z
section order_iso
variables [succ_order ι] [pred_order ι] [is_succ_archimedean ι]
/-- `to_Z` defines an `order_iso` between `ι` and its range. -/
noncomputable
def order_iso_range_to_Z_of_linear_succ_pred_arch [hι : nonempty ι] :
ι ≃o set.range (to_Z hι.some) :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.of_injective _ injective_to_Z,
map_rel_iff' := to_Z_le_iff, }
@[priority 100]
instance countable_of_linear_succ_pred_arch : countable ι :=
begin
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty ι with _ hι,
{ apply_instance, },
{ exact countable.of_equiv _ (order_iso_range_to_Z_of_linear_succ_pred_arch).symm.to_equiv, },
end
/-- If the order has neither bot nor top, `to_Z` defines an `order_iso` between `ι` and `ℤ`. -/
noncomputable
def order_iso_int_of_linear_succ_pred_arch [no_max_order ι] [no_min_order ι] [hι : nonempty ι] :
ι ≃o ℤ :=
{ to_fun := to_Z hι.some,
inv_fun := λ n, if 0 ≤ n then (succ^[n.to_nat] hι.some) else (pred^[(-n).to_nat] hι.some),
left_inv := λ i,
begin
cases le_or_lt hι.some i with hi hi,
{ have h_nonneg : 0 ≤ to_Z hι.some i := to_Z_nonneg hi,
simp_rw if_pos h_nonneg,
exact iterate_succ_to_Z i hi, },
{ have h_neg : to_Z hι.some i < 0 := to_Z_neg hi,
simp_rw if_neg (not_le.mpr h_neg),
exact iterate_pred_to_Z i hi, },
end,
right_inv := λ n,
begin
cases le_or_lt 0 n with hn hn,
{ simp_rw if_pos hn,
rw to_Z_iterate_succ,
exact int.to_nat_of_nonneg hn, },
{ simp_rw if_neg (not_le.mpr hn),
rw to_Z_iterate_pred,
simp only [hn.le, int.to_nat_of_nonneg, right.nonneg_neg_iff, neg_neg], },
end,
map_rel_iff' := to_Z_le_iff, }
/-- If the order has a bot but no top, `to_Z` defines an `order_iso` between `ι` and `ℕ`. -/
def order_iso_nat_of_linear_succ_pred_arch [no_max_order ι] [order_bot ι] :
ι ≃o ℕ :=
{ to_fun := λ i, (to_Z ⊥ i).to_nat,
inv_fun := λ n, succ^[n] ⊥,
left_inv := λ i, by { simp_rw if_pos (to_Z_nonneg bot_le), exact iterate_succ_to_Z i bot_le, },
right_inv := λ n,
begin
simp_rw if_pos bot_le,
rw to_Z_iterate_succ,
exact int.to_nat_coe_nat n,
end,
map_rel_iff' := λ i j,
begin
simp only [equiv.coe_fn_mk, int.to_nat_le],
rw [← @to_Z_le_iff ι _ _ _ _ ⊥, int.to_nat_of_nonneg (to_Z_nonneg bot_le)],
end, }
/-- If the order has both a bot and a top, `to_Z` gives an `order_iso` between `ι` and
`finset.range n` for some `n`. -/
def order_iso_range_of_linear_succ_pred_arch [order_bot ι] [order_top ι] :
ι ≃o finset.range ((to_Z ⊥ (⊤ : ι)).to_nat + 1) :=
{ to_fun := λ i, ⟨(to_Z ⊥ i).to_nat,
finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mpr (int.to_nat_le_to_nat ((to_Z_le_iff _ _).mpr le_top))⟩,
inv_fun := λ n, succ^[n] ⊥,
left_inv := λ i, iterate_succ_to_Z i bot_le,
right_inv := λ n, begin
ext1,
simp only [subtype.coe_mk],
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ rw int.to_nat_le,
exact (to_Z_iterate_succ_le _), },
by_cases hn_max : is_max (succ^[↑n] (⊥ : ι)),
{ rw [← is_top_iff_is_max, is_top_iff_eq_top] at hn_max,
rw hn_max,
exact nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (finset.mem_range.mp n.prop), },
{ rw to_Z_iterate_succ_of_not_is_max _ hn_max,
simp only [int.to_nat_coe_nat], },
end,
map_rel_iff' := λ i j,
begin
simp only [equiv.coe_fn_mk, subtype.mk_le_mk, int.to_nat_le],
rw [← @to_Z_le_iff ι _ _ _ _ ⊥, int.to_nat_of_nonneg (to_Z_nonneg bot_le)],
end, }
end order_iso
|
ab0f929a1428c84fad8bfbddba083f37a3ec1a0b | ed27983dd289b3bcad416f0b1927105d6ef19db8 | /src/inClassNotes/type_library/list_test.lean | 85fd16332f2f5666be583fedf82bcd10cfa6947e | [] | no_license | liuxin-James/complogic-s21 | 0d55b76dbe25024473d31d98b5b83655c365f811 | 13e03e0114626643b44015c654151fb651603486 | refs/heads/master | 1,681,109,264,463 | 1,618,848,261,000 | 1,618,848,261,000 | 337,599,491 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,613,141,619,000 | 1,612,925,555,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,463 | lean | import .list
namespace hidden
-- list is polymorphic
#check list nat -- nat lives in Type
#check list bool -- bool lives in Type
#check list Type -- Type lives in Type 1
#check list (Type 1) -- Type 1 lives in Type 2
/-
Some lists of nats
-/
#eval list.nil -- can't infer α
#eval @list.nil nat -- can't infer α
#eval (list.nil : list nat)
/-
Top-down (outside-in) refinement
-/
def lnat0 : list nat := list.nil
def lnat1 : list nat :=
list.cons
(1)
(list.cons
(2)
list.nil
)
def lstr1 : list string :=
list.cons
("1")
(list.cons
("2")
(list.nil)
)
/-
cons
/ \
"hi" cons
/ \
"ho" ...
-/
-- FUNCTIONS
def head { α : Type } : list α → option α
| list.nil := none
| (list.cons h t) := some h
#reduce head lnat1
def tail { α : Type } : list α → option (list α)
| list.nil := none
| (list.cons h t) := some t
-- recursive definition of length (by cases)
-- strucute recursion can guarantees to teminate
def length {α : Type} : list α → nat
| list.nil := 0
| (list.cons h t) := (length t) + 1 -- length in context
def append {α : Type} : list α → list α → list α
| list.nil m := m
| (list.cons h t) m := list.cons h (append t m)
-- h :: append t m
#eval append lnat0 lnat1
def pure {α : Type} : α → list α
| a := list.cons a list.nil
def reverse {α : Type} : list α → list α
| list.nil := list.nil
| (list.cons h t) := append(reverse t) (pure h)
#eval reverse lnat1
#eval reverse (list.cons 1 (list.cons 2 list.nil))
end hidden
/-
From here on, we use Lean's identical
definition of the list type, but we
gain the benefit of additional notation.
-/
/-
NOTATION
-/
#eval list.cons "hi" (list.cons "ho" list.nil)
#eval ["hi", "ho"]
#eval list.cons "hi" ["ho"]
#eval "hi"::["ho"]
#eval
let s : string :=
let a := ["hi","ho"]
in
(match a with
| list.nil := "oops"
| (h::t) := h
end)
in s ++ "!"
-- more examples
#eval [1,2,3,4,5]
#eval 1::[2,3,4,5]
#eval 1::2::3::4::5::list.nil
def head { α : Type } : list α → option α
| list.nil := none
| (h::t) := some h
def tail { α : Type } : list α → option (list α)
| list.nil := none
| (h::t) := some t
-- recursive definition of length (by cases)
def length {α : Type} : list α → nat
| list.nil := 0
| (h::t) := (_) + 1 -- length in context
#eval list.append ["Hi","Ho"] ["!"]
#eval ["Hi","Ho"] ++ ["!"]
#check @pure list
#eval (pure 5 : list nat)
#eval (pure 5 : option nat) -- whoa (later)
def reverse {α : Type} : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (h::t) := (reverse t)++[h] -- use nice notation here
universe u
/-
HIGHER ORDER FUNCTIONS
-/
/-
Suppose we want to map a list of
strings to a list of bools, where
each bool is tt if the length of
the corresponding string is even,
and false otherwise.
-/
def strlist := ["Hello", "There", "Lean"]
def map_ev_string_bool :
list string →
list bool
| list.nil := list.nil
| (h::t) := (h.length%2=0)::(map_ev_string_bool t)
#eval map_ev_string_bool strlist
def map_odd_string_bool :
list string →
list bool
| list.nil := list.nil
| (h::t) := (h.length%2=1)::_
def map_string_bang_string :
list string →
list string
| list.nil := list.nil
| (h::t) := (h++"!")::(map_string_bang_string t)
#eval map_string_bang_string strlist
/-
Dimensions of variation?
-- argument list element type, α
-- result list element type, β
-- function used to transform α → β
-/
def map_list {α β : Type u} :
(α → β) → list α → list β
| f list.nil := list.nil
| f (h::t) := (f h)::(map_list f t)
#eval map_list
(λ (s : string), s.length)
(strlist)
#eval map_list
(λ (s : string), (s.length%2=0:bool))
(strlist)
def exclafy : list string → list string :=
map_list (λ (s : string), s++"!") -- arg
#eval exclafy ["Whoa","That","Is","COOL"]
/-
Define reduce, or fold, over a list.
Let's start with an example. Suppose
we're given a list of strings and we
want to know if they are all of even
length. What we need is a function,
allEvenLength : list string → bool,
that returns tt iff all strings in
the list have even length.
Let's do an informal case analysis:
First we consider the case where the
given list of strings, l, is not empty.
In this case it has the form (h::t),
with (h : string) and (t : list string).
And in this case, every string in the
list will have even length iff (1) h
is of even length *AND* every string
in the tail, t, of l, also has even
length.
Now consider the case where l is nil.
What Boolean value do we return? One
might guess false ... incorrectly.
Suppose our function returned false
(ff) for the empty list. Consider a
case where l = ["Hi"]. That is, the
list, l = (list.cons "Hi" list.nil).
The list is non-empty, so the first
rule applies: return the AND of two
Boolean values: one for "Hi" and one
for the rest of the list. For "Hi"
we will get true, as "Hi" has even
length, so our result will have to
be (tt ∧ X), where X is the result
for the rest of the list. But here
the rest of the list is empty. So
what *must* R, the result for the
empty list, be for the function to
return the right result, tt (as all
strings in the list are even length)?
Clearly the answer must be true (tt).
What would happen if it were ff?
So now we have our algorithm!
-/
-- first a predicate function
def isEvenStr (s : string) : bool :=
(s.length % 2 = 0)
def allEvenStr : list string → bool
| list.nil := tt
| (h::t) := band (isEvenStr h) (allEvenStr t)
#eval allEvenStr []
#eval allEvenStr ["Hi"]
#eval allEvenStr ["Hi!"]
#eval allEvenStr ["Hi","There!"]
#eval allEvenStr ["Hi","Ho!"]
/-
Now suppose we want to know if there
is *at least* one string of even length
in any given list of strings.
Again we do a case analysis.
There is at least one even-length
string in a non-empty list, l = h::t,
iff h is of even length OR there is at
least one even-lenght string in the
rest of the list.
Now suppose t is the empty string.
What result must be returned for the
function to work. Consider the case
where l = ["Hi!"] = (cons "Hi" nil).
The correct answer here is (ff ∨ X),
with the ff because "Hi!" is not of
even length, and X is the answer for
the empty list. To get the correct
answer, it must be that X = ff. So
now again we have our algorithm.
-/
/-
The key idea both here and in the
preceding example is that the answer
for the empty list must leave the
result for the preceding elements
unchanged. The result must be the
*identity element* for the Boolean
operator being used to combine the
values for the head and rest of the
list.
The identity element for Boolean and
is tt, and for Boolean or it is ff.
∀ (b : bool), b ∧ tt = b
∀ (b : bool), b ∨ ff = b
We can see these propositions are true
by case analysis. Case 1: b = tt. In
this case b ∧ tt = tt and b = tt so
b ∧ t = b. Exercise: Finish up.
-/
def someEvenStr : list string → bool
| list.nil := ff
| (h::t) := bor (isEvenStr h) (someEvenStr t)
#eval someEvenStr []
#eval someEvenStr ["Hi"]
#eval someEvenStr ["Hi!"]
#eval someEvenStr ["Hello","Lean"]
#eval someEvenStr ["Hello","Lean!"]
/-
Now a key observation: Our two functions
are very similar, varying in only a few
dimensions. Let's factor dimensions of
variation into parameter to generalize
our definition.
First, we want to be able to operte on
lists of values of any type, not just
strings. Let call the list element type
α.
Second, in general, we want to reduce
a list (l : list α) to a value of some
other type, let's call it β, just as in
our examples we reduced lists of values
of type α = string to a final result of
type β = bool.
Third, we need a function to compute
the answer for a non-empty list (h::t)
where (1) (h : α), (2) the result for
the rest of the list is of type β, and
(3) the final combined result is of type
β. The type of this reducing function is
thus α → β → β.
Finally, we need a result value for the
empty list. This value obviously has to
be of type β.
Those are our parameters!
Given:
{ α : Type u}
{ β : Type u}
( f : α → β → β )
( id : β)
( l : list α)
Compute result : β
-/
-- By case analysis on the list l
def fold { α : Type u} { β : Type u} :
( α → β → β ) → β → list α → β
| f id list.nil := id
| f id (h::t) := f h (fold f id t)
-- allEven
def allStrCombine : string → bool → bool
| s b := band (isEvenStr s) b
def allEvenStr' (l : list string) : bool :=
fold allStrCombine tt l
def someStrCombine : string → bool → bool
| s b := bor (isEvenStr s) b
def someEvenStr' (l : list string) : bool :=
fold someStrCombine ff l
#eval allEvenStr' []
#eval allEvenStr' ["Hi"]
#eval allEvenStr' ["Hi!"]
#eval allEvenStr' ["Hi","There!"]
#eval allEvenStr' ["Hi","Ho!"]
#eval someEvenStr []
#eval someEvenStr' ["Hi"]
#eval someEvenStr' ["Hi!"]
#eval someEvenStr' ["Hello","Lean"]
#eval someEvenStr' ["Hello","Lean!"]
#eval fold nat.add 0 [10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1]
#eval fold nat.mul 1 [10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1]
#eval fold string.append "" ["Hello, ", "Lean. ", "We ", "love ", "you!"]
/-
Given a predicate function on the type of
element in a list, return the sublist of
elements for which predicate is true.
Define filter by case analysis with one
case a base case and the other case using
"structural recursion" on list argument.
An opportunity to introduces if/then/else
expression in Lean.
-/
def filter' {α : Type u} :
(α → bool) → list α → list α
| f list.nil := list.nil
| f (h::t) := if (f h)
then h::(filter' f t)
else (filter' f t)
/-
Take opportunity to introduce let
bindings. Binds name to result of
evaluation, then evaluates expr in
context of that additional binding.
-/
def filter {α : Type u} :
(α → bool) → list α → list α
| f list.nil := list.nil
| f (h::t) := let restOfResult := (filter f t)
in
if (f h)
then h::restOfResult
else restOfResult
def isEven (n : nat) : bool := n%2 = 0
#eval filter isEven []
#eval filter isEven [0,1,2,3,5,6,7,9,10]
/-
Note: the body of a let can use another
let. That is, let bindings can be chained.
let x := 1 in
let y := 2+3 in
let z := 3*4 in
x + y + z
To what value does this expression reduce?
-/
|
b67d4c9cb1cc5f0d50d6dbd49b7a24bd217bc7d6 | 853df553b1d6ca524e3f0a79aedd32dde5d27ec3 | /src/data/list/basic.lean | 427fe3b39d16282346ab2942edad8fc15679516d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | DanielFabian/mathlib | efc3a50b5dde303c59eeb6353ef4c35a345d7112 | f520d07eba0c852e96fe26da71d85bf6d40fcc2a | refs/heads/master | 1,668,739,922,971 | 1,595,201,756,000 | 1,595,201,756,000 | 279,469,476 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,594,696,604,000 | 1,594,696,604,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 155,352 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import deprecated.group
import data.nat.basic
import order.rel_classes
import algebra.order_functions
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
open function nat
namespace list
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
attribute [inline] list.head
instance : is_left_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ nil_append ⟩
instance : is_right_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ append_nil ⟩
instance : is_associative (list α) has_append.append :=
⟨ append_assoc ⟩
theorem cons_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ [].
theorem head_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → h₁ = h₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pheq)
theorem tail_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → t₁ = t₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pteq)
theorem cons_injective {a : α} : injective (cons a) :=
assume l₁ l₂, assume Pe, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Pe
theorem cons_inj (a : α) {l l' : list α} : a::l = a::l' ↔ l = l' :=
⟨λ e, cons_injective e, congr_arg _⟩
/-! ### mem -/
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ [a] := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] → a = b :=
assume : a ∈ [b], or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, this)
(assume : a ∈ [], absurd this (not_mem_nil a))
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton, or.inl⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b::l → b ∈ l → a ∈ l :=
assume ainbl binl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(assume : a = b, begin subst a, exact binl end)
(assume : a ∈ l, this)
theorem eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ (a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l) :=
classical.by_cases or.inl $ assume : a ≠ b, h.elim or.inl $ assume h, or.inr ⟨this, h⟩
theorem not_mem_append {a : α} {s t : list α} (h₁ : a ∉ s) (h₂ : a ∉ t) : a ∉ s ++ t :=
mt mem_append.1 $ not_or_distrib.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : l ≠ [] :=
by intro e; rw e at h; cases h
theorem mem_split {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ a :: t :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {cases h}, rcases h with rfl | h,
{ exact ⟨[], l, rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ih h with ⟨s, t, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b::s, t, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem mem_of_ne_of_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ≠ y) (h₂ : a ∈ y :: l) : a ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₂) (λe, absurd e h₁) (λr, r)
theorem ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
theorem not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ≠ y → a ∉ l → a ∉ y::l :=
assume p1 p2, not.intro (assume Pain, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pain) (not_or p1 p2))
theorem ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ y::l → a ≠ y ∧ a ∉ l :=
assume p, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons p) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons p)
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : f a ∈ map f l :=
begin
induction l with b l' ih,
{cases h},
{rcases h with rfl | h,
{exact or.inl rfl},
{exact or.inr (ih h)}}
end
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} (h : b ∈ map f l) :
∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
begin
induction l with c l' ih,
{cases h},
{cases (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) with h h,
{exact ⟨c, mem_cons_self _ _, h.symm⟩},
{rcases ih h with ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
exact ⟨a, mem_cons_of_mem _ ha₁, ha₂⟩ }}
end
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} : b ∈ map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map, λ ⟨a, la, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact mem_map_of_mem f la⟩
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : injective f) {a : α} {l : list α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ m, let ⟨a', m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m in H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
lemma forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : list α} {P : β → Prop} :
(∀ i ∈ l.map f, P i) ↔ ∀ j ∈ l, P (f j) :=
begin
split,
{ assume H j hj,
exact H (f j) (mem_map_of_mem f hj) },
{ assume H i hi,
rcases mem_map.1 hi with ⟨j, hj, ji⟩,
rw ← ji,
exact H j hj }
end
@[simp] lemma map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} : list.map f l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨by cases l; simp only [forall_prop_of_true, map, forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff],
λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, a ∈ join L ↔ ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l
| [] := ⟨false.elim, λ⟨_, h, _⟩, false.elim h⟩
| (c :: L) := by simp only [join, mem_append, @mem_join L, mem_cons_iff, or_and_distrib_right,
exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} {L : list (list α)} : a ∈ join L → ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l :=
mem_join.1
theorem mem_join_of_mem {a : α} {L : list (list α)} {l} (lL : l ∈ L) (al : a ∈ l) : a ∈ join L :=
mem_join.2 ⟨l, lL, al⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
iff.trans mem_join
⟨λ ⟨l', h1, h2⟩, let ⟨a, al, fa⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h1 in ⟨a, al, fa.symm ▸ h2⟩,
λ ⟨a, al, bfa⟩, ⟨f a, mem_map_of_mem _ al, bfa⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} :
b ∈ list.bind l f → ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
mem_bind.1
theorem mem_bind_of_mem {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (h : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ list.bind l f :=
mem_bind.2 ⟨a, al, h⟩
lemma bind_map {g : α → list β} {f : β → γ} :
∀(l : list α), list.map f (l.bind g) = l.bind (λa, (g a).map f)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [cons_bind, map_append, bind_map l]
/-! ### length -/
theorem length_eq_zero {l : list α} : length l = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_pos_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → 0 < length l
| (b::l) _ := zero_lt_succ _
theorem exists_mem_of_length_pos : ∀ {l : list α}, 0 < length l → ∃ a, a ∈ l
| (b::l) _ := ⟨b, mem_cons_self _ _⟩
theorem length_pos_iff_exists_mem {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l :=
⟨exists_mem_of_length_pos, λ ⟨a, h⟩, length_pos_of_mem h⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_length_pos {l : list α} : 0 < length l → l ≠ [] :=
λ h1 h2, lt_irrefl 0 ((length_eq_zero.2 h2).subst h1)
theorem length_pos_of_ne_nil {l : list α} : l ≠ [] → 0 < length l :=
λ h, pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ λ h0, h $ length_eq_zero.1 h0
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem length_eq_one {l : list α} : length l = 1 ↔ ∃ a, l = [a] :=
⟨match l with [a], _ := ⟨a, rfl⟩ end, λ ⟨a, e⟩, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma exists_of_length_succ {n} :
∀ l : list α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [] H := absurd H.symm $ succ_ne_zero n
| (h :: t) H := ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
lemma length_injective_iff : injective (list.length : list α → ℕ) ↔ subsingleton α :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, refine ⟨λ x y, _⟩, suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, refl },
{ intros hα l1 l2 hl, induction l1 generalizing l2; cases l2,
{ refl }, { cases hl }, { cases hl },
congr, exactI subsingleton.elim _ _, apply l1_ih, simpa using hl }
end
lemma length_injective [subsingleton α] : injective (length : list α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr $ by apply_instance
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
lemma empty_eq : (∅ : list α) = [] := by refl
lemma singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : list α) = [x] := rfl
lemma insert_neg [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∉ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
if_neg h
lemma insert_pos [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∈ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = l :=
if_pos h
lemma doubleton_eq [decidable_eq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : list α) = [x, y] :=
by { rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq], rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton] }
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ∀ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
@[simp] theorem forall_mem_cons' {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ (x : α), x = a ∨ x ∈ l → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp only [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp only [mem_cons_iff, forall_mem_cons']
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
(forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem forall_mem_singleton {p : α → Prop} {a : α} : (∀ x ∈ [a], p x) ↔ p a :=
by simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ++ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem not_exists_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : list α) (h : p a) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.intro a (mem_cons_self _ _) h
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ l, p x) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xl px, bex.intro x (mem_cons_of_mem _ xl) px)
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xal px,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal)
(assume : x = a, begin rw ←this, left, exact px end)
(assume : x ∈ l, or.inr (bex.intro x this px)))
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : list α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons
(assume h, or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists)
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {l m : list α} :
a::l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m :=
by simp only [subset_def, mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : list α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
λ a h, (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
@[simp] theorem append_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, simp only [subset_def] at *, split; intros; simp* },
{ rintro ⟨h1, h2⟩, apply append_subset_of_subset_of_subset h1 h2 }
end
theorem eq_nil_of_subset_nil : ∀ {l : list α}, l ⊆ [] → l = []
| [] s := rfl
| (a::l) s := false.elim $ s $ mem_cons_self a l
theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : list α} : l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ l :=
show l = [] ↔ l ⊆ [], from ⟨λ e, e ▸ subset.refl _, eq_nil_of_subset_nil⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
λ x, by simp only [mem_map, not_and, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp]; exact λ a h e, ⟨a, H h, e⟩
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (h : injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_subset f⟩, intros h2 x hx,
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩,
cases h hxx', exact hx'
end
/-! ### append -/
lemma append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : list α} : list.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma singleton_append {x : α} {l : list α} : [x] ++ l = x :: l := rfl
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left (s t : list α) : s ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right (s t : list α) : t ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
@[simp] lemma append_eq_nil {p q : list α} : (p ++ q) = [] ↔ p = [] ∧ q = [] :=
by cases p; simp only [nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, false_and]
@[simp] lemma nil_eq_append_iff {a b : list α} : [] = a ++ b ↔ a = [] ∧ b = [] :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_nil]
lemma append_eq_cons_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
a ++ b = x :: c ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by cases a; simp only [and_assoc, @eq_comm _ c, nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true,
true_and, false_and, exists_false, false_or, or_false, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left']
lemma cons_eq_append_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
(x :: c : list α) = a ++ b ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_cons_iff]
lemma append_eq_append_iff {a b c d : list α} :
a ++ b = c ++ d ↔ (∃a', c = a ++ a' ∧ b = a' ++ d) ∨ (∃c', a = c ++ c' ∧ d = c' ++ b) :=
begin
induction a generalizing c,
case nil { rw nil_append, split,
{ rintro rfl, left, exact ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨a', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨a', H, rfl⟩), {refl}, {rw [← append_assoc, ← H], refl} } },
case cons : a as ih {
cases c,
{ simp only [cons_append, nil_append, false_and, exists_false, false_or, exists_eq_left'],
exact eq_comm },
{ simp only [cons_append, @eq_comm _ a, ih, and_assoc, and_or_distrib_left,
exists_and_distrib_left] } }
end
@[simp] theorem split_at_eq_take_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), split_at n l = (take n l, drop n l)
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp only [split_at, split_at_eq_take_drop n xs, take, drop]
@[simp] theorem take_append_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := congr_arg (cons x) $ take_append_drop n xs
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
theorem append_inj :
∀ {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}, s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂ → length s₁ = length s₂ → s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂
| [] [] t₁ t₂ h hl := ⟨rfl, h⟩
| (a::s₁) [] t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl
| [] (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm
| (a::s₁) (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion h $ λab hap,
let ⟨e1, e2⟩ := @append_inj s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ hap (succ.inj hl) in
by rw [ab, e1, e2]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem append_inj_right {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).left
theorem append_inj' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) :
s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj h $ @nat.add_right_cancel _ (length t₁) _ $
let hap := congr_arg length h in by simp only [length_append] at hap; rwa [← hl] at hap
theorem append_inj_right' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).left
theorem append_left_cancel {s t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj_right h rfl
theorem append_right_cancel {s₁ s₂ t : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t) : s₁ = s₂ :=
append_inj_left' h rfl
theorem append_right_inj {t₁ t₂ : list α} (s) : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂ ↔ t₁ = t₂ :=
⟨append_left_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
theorem append_left_inj {s₁ s₂ : list α} (t) : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
⟨append_right_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
theorem map_eq_append_split {f : α → β} {l : list α} {s₁ s₂ : list β}
(h : map f l = s₁ ++ s₂) : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = s₁ ∧ map f l₂ = s₂ :=
begin
have := h, rw [← take_append_drop (length s₁) l] at this ⊢,
rw map_append at this,
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, append_inj this _⟩,
rw [length_map, length_take, min_eq_left],
rw [← length_map f l, h, length_append],
apply nat.le_add_right
end
/-! ### repeat -/
@[simp] theorem repeat_succ (a : α) (n) : repeat a (n + 1) = a :: repeat a n := rfl
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} : ∀ {n}, b ∈ repeat a n → b = a
| (n+1) h := or.elim h id $ @eq_of_mem_repeat _
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ b ∈ l, b = a) → l = repeat a l.length
| [] H := rfl
| (b::l) H := by cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂;
unfold length repeat; congr; [exact H₁, exact eq_repeat_of_mem H₂]
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {l : list α} : l = repeat a l.length ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat, eq_repeat_of_mem⟩
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : l = repeat a n ↔ length l = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨length_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_add (a : α) (m n) : repeat a (m + n) = repeat a m ++ repeat a n :=
by induction m; simp only [*, zero_add, succ_add, repeat]; split; refl
theorem repeat_subset_singleton (a : α) (n) : repeat a n ⊆ [a] :=
λ b h, mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_repeat h)
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : list α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) l = repeat b l.length :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ :=
by rw map_const at h; exact eq_of_mem_repeat h
@[simp] theorem map_repeat (f : α → β) (a : α) (n) : map f (repeat a n) = repeat (f a) n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem tail_repeat (a : α) (n) : tail (repeat a n) = repeat a n.pred :=
by cases n; refl
@[simp] theorem join_repeat_nil (n : ℕ) : join (repeat [] n) = @nil α :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, join, append_nil]]
/-! ### pure -/
@[simp] theorem mem_pure {α} (x y : α) :
x ∈ (pure y : list α) ↔ x = y := by simp! [pure,list.ret]
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → list β) (l : list α) :
l >>= f = l.bind f := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_append (f : α → list β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).bind f = l₁.bind f ++ l₂.bind f :=
append_bind _ _ _
@[simp] theorem bind_singleton (f : α → list β) (x : α) : [x].bind f = f x :=
append_nil (f x)
/-! ### concat -/
theorem concat_nil (a : α) : concat [] a = [a] := rfl
theorem concat_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : concat (a :: l) b = a :: concat l b := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_eq_append (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = l ++ [a] :=
by induction l; simp only [*, concat]; split; refl
theorem concat_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a ≠ [] :=
by simp
theorem concat_append (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : concat l₁ a ++ l₂ = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ :=
by simp
theorem length_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : length (concat l a) = succ (length l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, length_append, length]
theorem append_concat (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ++ concat l₂ a = concat (l₁ ++ l₂) a :=
by simp
/-! ### reverse -/
@[simp] theorem reverse_nil : reverse (@nil α) = [] := rfl
local attribute [simp] reverse_core
@[simp] theorem reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = reverse l ++ [a] :=
have aux : ∀ l₁ l₂, reverse_core l₁ l₂ ++ [a] = reverse_core l₁ (l₂ ++ [a]),
by intro l₁; induction l₁; intros; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, cons_append]],
(aux l nil).symm
theorem reverse_core_eq (l₁ l₂ : list α) : reverse_core l₁ l₂ = reverse l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by induction l₁ generalizing l₂; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, reverse_cons, append_assoc]];
refl
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = concat (reverse l) a :=
by simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_append (s t : list α) : reverse (s ++ t) = (reverse t) ++ (reverse s) :=
by induction s; [rw [nil_append, reverse_nil, append_nil],
simp only [*, cons_append, reverse_cons, append_assoc]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (l : list α) : reverse (reverse l) = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, reverse_append]]; refl
theorem reverse_injective : injective (@reverse α) :=
left_inverse.injective reverse_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem reverse_eq_nil {l : list α} : reverse l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
@reverse_inj _ l []
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem length_reverse (l : list α) : length (reverse l) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, length_append, length]]
@[simp] theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map, reverse_cons, map_append]]
theorem map_reverse_core (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
map f (reverse_core l₁ l₂) = reverse_core (map f l₁) (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [reverse_core_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ reverse l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, mem_cons_iff,
not_mem_nil, false_or, or_false, or_comm]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_repeat (a : α) (n) : reverse (repeat a n) = repeat a n :=
eq_repeat.2 ⟨by simp only [length_reverse, length_repeat],
λ b h, eq_of_mem_repeat (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def reverse_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C [])
(H1 : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), C l → C (l ++ [a])) : C l :=
begin
rw ← reverse_reverse l,
induction reverse l,
{ exact H0 },
{ rw reverse_cons, exact H1 _ _ ih }
end
/-! ### is_nil -/
lemma is_nil_iff_eq_nil {l : list α} : l.is_nil ↔ l = [] :=
list.cases_on l (by simp [is_nil]) (by simp [is_nil])
/-! ### last -/
@[simp] theorem last_cons {a : α} {l : list α} :
∀ (h₁ : a :: l ≠ nil) (h₂ : l ≠ nil), last (a :: l) h₁ = last l h₂ :=
by {induction l; intros, contradiction, reflexivity}
@[simp] theorem last_append {a : α} (l : list α) (h : l ++ [a] ≠ []) : last (l ++ [a]) h = a :=
by induction l;
[refl, simp only [cons_append, last_cons _ (λ H, cons_ne_nil _ _ (append_eq_nil.1 H).2), *]]
theorem last_concat {a : α} (l : list α) (h : concat l a ≠ []) : last (concat l a) h = a :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, last_append]
@[simp] theorem last_singleton (a : α) (h : [a] ≠ []) : last [a] h = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem last_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : list α) (h : a₁::a₂::l ≠ []) :
last (a₁::a₂::l) h = last (a₂::l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) := rfl
theorem last_congr {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
last l₁ h₁ = last l₂ h₂ :=
by subst l₁
theorem last_mem : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), last l h ∈ l
| [] h := absurd rfl h
| [a] h := or.inl rfl
| (a::b::l) h := or.inr $ by { rw [last_cons_cons], exact last_mem (cons_ne_nil b l) }
/-! ### last' -/
@[simp] theorem last'_is_none :
∀ {l : list α}, (last' l).is_none ↔ l = []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_none (b::l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_is_some : ∀ {l : list α}, l.last'.is_some ↔ l ≠ []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_some (b::l)]
theorem mem_last'_eq_last : ∀ {l : list α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.last' → ∃ h, x = last l h
| [] x hx := false.elim $ by simpa using hx
| [a] x hx := have a = x, by simpa using hx, this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| (a::b::l) x hx :=
begin
rw last' at hx,
rcases mem_last'_eq_last hx with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
use cons_ne_nil _ _,
rwa [last_cons]
end
theorem mem_of_mem_last' {l : list α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.last') : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := mem_last'_eq_last ha in h₂.symm ▸ last_mem _
theorem init_append_last' : ∀ {l : list α} (a ∈ l.last'), init l ++ [a] = l
| [] a ha := (option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a] _ rfl := rfl
| (a :: b :: l) c hc := by { rw [last'] at hc, rw [init, cons_append, init_append_last' _ hc] }
theorem ilast_eq_last' [inhabited α] : ∀ l : list α, l.ilast = l.last'.iget
| [] := by simp [ilast, arbitrary]
| [a] := rfl
| [a, b] := rfl
| [a, b, c] := rfl
| (a :: b :: c :: l) := by simp [ilast, ilast_eq_last' (c :: l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_append_cons : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (a : α) (l₂ : list α),
last' (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = last' (a :: l₂)
| [] a l₂ := rfl
| [b] a l₂ := rfl
| (b::c::l₁) a l₂ := by rw [cons_append, cons_append, last', ← cons_append, last'_append_cons]
theorem last'_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : list α) : ∀ {l₂ : list α} (hl₂ : l₂ ≠ []),
last' (l₁ ++ l₂) = last' l₂
| [] hl₂ := by contradiction
| (b::l₂) _ := last'_append_cons l₁ b l₂
/-! ### head(') and tail -/
theorem head_eq_head' [inhabited α] (l : list α) : head l = (head' l).iget :=
by cases l; refl
theorem mem_of_mem_head' {x : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, x ∈ l.head' → x ∈ l
| [] h := (option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| (a::l) h := by { simp only [head', option.mem_def] at h, exact h ▸ or.inl rfl }
@[simp] theorem head_cons [inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : head (a::l) = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_nil : tail (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tail (a::l) = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_append [inhabited α] (t : list α) {s : list α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head (s ++ t) = head s :=
by {induction s, contradiction, refl}
theorem cons_head'_tail : ∀ {l : list α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ head' l), a :: tail l = l
| [] a h := by contradiction
| (b::l) a h := by { simp at h, simp [h] }
theorem head_mem_head' [inhabited α] : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), head l ∈ head' l
| [] h := by contradiction
| (a::l) h := rfl
theorem cons_head_tail [inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []) : (head l)::(tail l) = l :=
cons_head'_tail (head_mem_head' h)
@[simp] theorem head'_map (f : α → β) (l) : head' (map f l) = (head' l).map f := by cases l; refl
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : Π (l : list α), [] <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons _ _ a (nil_sublist l)
@[refl, simp] theorem sublist.refl : Π (l : list α), l <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons2 _ _ a (sublist.refl l)
@[trans] theorem sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ :=
sublist.rec_on h₂ (λ_ s, s)
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH l₁ h₁))
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, @sublist.cases_on _ (λl₁ l₂', l₂' = a :: l₂ → l₁ <+ a :: l₃) _ _ h₁
(λ_, nil_sublist _)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end) rfl)
l₁ h₁
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : l <+ a::l :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist.refl l)
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist.trans (sublist_cons a l₁)
theorem cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ s
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := cons_sublist_cons _ (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₂ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := sublist.refl _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_left _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_right _ _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ {a : α}, a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ._ (sublist.cons ._ ._ a s) := sublist_of_cons_sublist s
| ._ (sublist.cons2 ._ ._ a s) := s
theorem cons_sublist_cons_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons, cons_sublist_cons _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := cons_sublist_cons_iff.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem sublist.append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l :=
begin
induction h with _ _ a _ ih _ _ a _ ih,
{ refl },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist a ih },
{ apply cons_sublist_cons a ih }
end
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a::l₂) :
l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l₁ with b l₁ IH generalizing l,
{ cases h, { left, exact ‹l <+ l₂› }, { right, apply mem_cons_self } },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact or.imp_left (sublist_cons_of_sublist _) (IH h) },
{ exact (IH h).imp (cons_sublist_cons _) (mem_cons_of_mem _) } }
end
theorem sublist.reverse {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse :=
begin
induction h with _ _ _ _ ih _ _ a _ ih, {refl},
{ rw reverse_cons, exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left ih },
{ rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons], exact ih.append_right [a] }
end
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist_iff]
using h.reverse,
λ h, h.append_right l⟩
theorem sublist.append {l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ : list α}
(hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem sublist.subset : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil b h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) b h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) b h :=
match eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h with
| or.inl h := h ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
| or.inr h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
end
theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ h, h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), λ h,
let ⟨s, t, e⟩ := mem_split h in e.symm ▸
(cons_sublist_cons _ (nil_sublist _)).trans (sublist_append_right _ _)⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil $ s.subset
theorem repeat_sublist_repeat (a : α) {m n} : repeat a m <+ repeat a n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [length_repeat] using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by induction h; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sublist.cons]] ⟩
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := rfl
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
absurd (length_le_of_sublist s) $ not_le_of_gt $ by rw h; apply lt_succ_self
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
by rw [length, length] at h; injection h with h; rw eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s (le_antisymm (length_le_of_sublist s) h)
theorem sublist.antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s₁ (length_le_of_sublist s₂)
instance decidable_sublist [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true $ nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λh, list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist l₁ l₂) $
by rw [← h]; exact ⟨cons_sublist_cons _, sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons⟩
else decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist (a::l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, λs, match a, l₁, s, h with
| a, l₁, sublist.cons ._ ._ ._ s', h := s'
| ._, ._, sublist.cons2 t ._ ._ s', h := absurd rfl h
end⟩
/-! ### index_of -/
section index_of
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nil (a : α) : index_of a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem index_of_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
index_of a (b::l) = if a = b then 0 else succ (index_of a l) := rfl
theorem index_of_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : list α) : a = b → index_of a (b::l) = 0 :=
assume e, if_pos e
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (a::l) = 0 :=
index_of_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem index_of_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : list α) : a ≠ b → index_of a (b::l) = succ (index_of a l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
theorem index_of_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _) },
simp only [length, mem_cons_iff, index_of_cons], split_ifs,
{ exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) (λ H, H $ or.inl h) },
{ simp only [h, false_or], rw ← ih, exact succ_inj' }
end
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem index_of_of_not_mem {l : list α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → index_of a l = length l :=
index_of_eq_length.2
theorem index_of_le_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l ≤ length l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {refl},
simp only [length, index_of_cons],
by_cases h : a = b, {rw if_pos h, exact nat.zero_le _},
rw if_neg h, exact succ_le_succ ih
end
theorem index_of_lt_length {a} {l : list α} : index_of a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λh, by_contradiction $ λ al, ne_of_lt h $ index_of_eq_length.2 al,
λal, lt_of_le_of_ne index_of_le_length $ λ h, index_of_eq_length.1 h al⟩
end index_of
/-! ### nth element -/
theorem nth_le_of_mem : ∀ {a} {l : list α}, a ∈ l → ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a
| a (_ :: l) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨0, succ_pos _, rfl⟩
| a (b :: l) (or.inr m) :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem m in ⟨n+1, succ_lt_succ h, e⟩
theorem nth_le_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n} h, nth l n = some (nth_le l n h)
| (a :: l) 0 h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := @nth_le_nth l n _
theorem nth_len_le : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, length l ≤ n → nth l n = none
| [] n h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := nth_len_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)
theorem nth_eq_some {l : list α} {n a} : nth l n = some a ↔ ∃ h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨λ e,
have h : n < length l, from lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn,
by rw nth_len_le hn at e; contradiction,
⟨h, by rw nth_le_nth h at e;
injection e with e; apply nth_le_mem⟩,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_nth _⟩
theorem nth_of_mem {a} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem h in ⟨n, by rw [nth_le_nth, e]⟩
theorem nth_le_mem : ∀ (l : list α) n h, nth_le l n h ∈ l
| (a :: l) 0 h := mem_cons_self _ _
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (nth_le_mem l _ _)
theorem nth_mem {l : list α} {n a} (e : nth l n = some a) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h, e⟩ := nth_eq_some.1 e in e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem mem_iff_nth_le {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨nth_le_of_mem, λ ⟨n, h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _⟩
theorem mem_iff_nth {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
mem_iff_nth_le.trans $ exists_congr $ λ n, nth_eq_some.symm
@[simp] theorem nth_map (f : α → β) : ∀ l n, nth (map f l) n = (nth l n).map f
| [] n := rfl
| (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) := nth_map l n
theorem nth_le_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nth_le (map f l) n H1 = f (nth_le l n H2) :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth, nth_map, nth_le_nth]; refl
/-- A version of `nth_le_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem nth_le_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nth_le l n H) = nth_le (map f l) n ((length_map f l).symm ▸ H) :=
(nth_le_map f _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem nth_le_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nth_le (map f l) n H = f (nth_le l n (length_map f l ▸ H)) :=
nth_le_map f _ _
/-- If one has `nth_le L i hi` in a formula and `h : L = L'`, one can not `rw h` in the formula as
`hi` gives `i < L.length` and not `i < L'.length`. The lemma `nth_le_of_eq` can be used to make
such a rewrite, with `rw (nth_le_of_eq h)`. -/
lemma nth_le_of_eq {L L' : list α} (h : L = L') {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le L' i (h ▸ hi) :=
by { congr, exact h}
@[simp] lemma nth_le_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) :
nth_le [a] n hn = a :=
have hn0 : n = 0 := le_zero_iff.1 (le_of_lt_succ hn),
by subst hn0; refl
lemma nth_le_zero [inhabited α] {L : list α} (h : 0 < L.length) :
L.nth_le 0 h = L.head :=
by { cases L, cases h, simp, }
lemma nth_le_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn₁) (hn₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n hn₁ = l₁.nth_le n hn₂
| [] _ n hn₁ hn₂ := (not_lt_zero _ hn₂).elim
| (a::l) _ 0 hn₁ hn₂ := rfl
| (a::l) _ (n+1) hn₁ hn₂ := by simp only [nth_le, cons_append];
exact nth_le_append _ _
lemma nth_le_append_right_aux {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}
(h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂ : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length) : n - l₁.length < l₂.length :=
begin
rw list.length_append at h₂,
convert (nat.sub_lt_sub_right_iff h₁).mpr h₂,
simp,
end
lemma nth_le_append_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n h₂ = l₂.nth_le (n - l₁.length) (nth_le_append_right_aux h₁ h₂)
| [] _ n h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) _ (n+1) h₁ h₂ :=
begin
dsimp,
conv { to_rhs, congr, skip, rw [←nat.sub_sub, nat.sub.right_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel], },
rw nth_le_append_right (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₁),
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_repeat (a : α) {n m : ℕ} (h : m < (list.repeat a n).length) :
(list.repeat a n).nth_le m h = a :=
eq_of_mem_repeat (nth_le_mem _ _ _)
lemma nth_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₁.nth n :=
have hn' : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length := lt_of_lt_of_le hn
(by rw length_append; exact le_add_right _ _),
by rw [nth_le_nth hn, nth_le_nth hn', nth_le_append]
lemma last_eq_nth_le : ∀ (l : list α) (h : l ≠ []),
last l h = l.nth_le (l.length - 1) (sub_lt (length_pos_of_ne_nil h) one_pos)
| [] h := rfl
| [a] h := by rw [last_singleton, nth_le_singleton]
| (a :: b :: l) h := by { rw [last_cons, last_eq_nth_le (b :: l)],
refl, exact cons_ne_nil b l }
@[simp] lemma nth_concat_length : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), (l ++ [a]).nth l.length = some a
| [] a := rfl
| (b::l) a := by rw [cons_append, length_cons, nth, nth_concat_length]
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (∀n, nth l₁ n = nth l₂ n) → l₁ = l₂
| [] [] h := rfl
| (a::l₁) [] h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| [] (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| (a::l₁) (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0; injection h0 with aa;
simp only [aa, ext (λn, h (n+1))]; split; refl
theorem ext_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂)
(h : ∀n h₁ h₂, nth_le l₁ n h₁ = nth_le l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext $ λn, if h₁ : n < length l₁
then by rw [nth_le_nth, nth_le_nth, h n h₁ (by rwa [← hl])]
else let h₁ := le_of_not_gt h₁ in by { rw [nth_len_le h₁, nth_len_le], rwa [←hl], }
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} :
∀ {l : list α} h, nth_le l (index_of a l) h = a
| (b::l) h := by by_cases h' : a = b;
simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, index_of_cons, nth_le, @index_of_nth_le l]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
nth l (index_of a l) = some a :=
by rw [nth_le_nth, index_of_nth_le (index_of_lt_length.2 h)]
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux1 :
∀ (l r : list α) (i h1 h2), nth_le (reverse_core l r) (i + length l) h1 = nth_le r i h2
| [] r i := λh1 h2, rfl
| (a :: l) r i :=
by rw (show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l, from add_right_comm i (length l) 1);
exact λh1 h2, nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) (i+1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
lemma index_of_inj [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} {x y : α}
(hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) : index_of x l = index_of y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨λ h, have nth_le l (index_of x l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hx) =
nth_le l (index_of y l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hy),
by simp only [h],
by simpa only [index_of_nth_le],
λ h, by subst h⟩
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux2 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i : nat) (h1) (h2),
nth_le (reverse_core l r) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2
| [] r i h1 h2 := absurd h2 (not_lt_zero _)
| (a :: l) r 0 h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) 0,
rw zero_add at aux,
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
end
| (a :: l) r (i+1) h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux2 l (a :: r) i,
have heq := calc length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1)
= length l - (1 + i) : by rw add_comm; refl
... = length l - 1 - i : by rw nat.sub_sub,
rw [← heq] at aux,
apply aux
end
@[simp] theorem nth_le_reverse (l : list α) (i : nat) (h1 h2) :
nth_le (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2 :=
nth_le_reverse_aux2 _ _ _ _ _
lemma eq_cons_of_length_one {l : list α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nth_le 0 (h.symm ▸ zero_lt_one)] :=
begin
refine ext_le (by convert h) (λ n h₁ h₂, _),
simp only [nth_le_singleton],
congr,
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₂)
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail {f g : list α → list α} (m : ℕ) :
∀n (l:list α), (l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g (m + n) =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g m) n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail n l)
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le
{f g : list α → list α} (m n : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g m =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g (m - n)) n :=
begin
rcases le_iff_exists_add.1 h with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rw [nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail]
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same {f g : list α → list α} (n : ℕ) (l:list α) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g n = l.modify_nth_tail (g ∘ f) n :=
by rw [modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le n n l (le_refl n), nat.sub_self]; refl
lemma modify_nth_tail_id :
∀n (l:list α), l.modify_nth_tail id n = l
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_id n l)
theorem remove_nth_eq_nth_tail : ∀ n (l : list α), remove_nth l n = modify_nth_tail tail n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (remove_nth_eq_nth_tail _ _)
theorem update_nth_eq_modify_nth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
update_nth l n a = modify_nth (λ _, a) n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (update_nth_eq_modify_nth _ _)
theorem modify_nth_eq_update_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
modify_nth f n l = ((λ a, update_nth l n (f a)) <$> nth l n).get_or_else l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := (congr_arg (cons b)
(modify_nth_eq_update_nth n l)).trans $ by cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_modify_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (modify_nth f n l) m = (λ a, if n = m then f a else a) <$> nth l m
| n l 0 := by cases l; cases n; refl
| n [] (m+1) := by cases n; refl
| 0 (a::l) (m+1) := by cases nth l m; refl
| (n+1) (a::l) (m+1) := (nth_modify_nth n l m).trans $
by cases nth l m with b; by_cases n = m;
simp only [h, if_pos, if_true, if_false, option.map_none, option.map_some, mt succ.inj,
not_false_iff]
theorem modify_nth_tail_length (f : list α → list α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth_tail f n l) = length l
| 0 l := H _
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (+1) (modify_nth_tail_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem modify_nth_length (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth f n l) = length l :=
modify_nth_tail_length _ (λ l, by cases l; refl)
@[simp] theorem update_nth_length (l : list α) (n) (a : α) :
length (update_nth l n a) = length l :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_length]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (modify_nth f n l) n = f <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (modify_nth f m l) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem nth_update_nth_eq (a : α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = (λ _, a) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_eq]
theorem nth_update_nth_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : list α} (h : n < length l) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = some a :=
by rw [nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth h]; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (update_nth l m a) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_ne _ _ h]
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_eq (l : list α) (i : ℕ) (a : α)
(h : i < (l.update_nth i a).length) : (l.update_nth i a).nth_le i h = a :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← nth_le_nth, nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth]; simp * at *
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_of_ne {l : list α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.update_nth i a).length) :
(l.update_nth i a).nth_le j hj = l.nth_le j (by simpa using hj) :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← list.nth_le_nth, list.nth_update_nth_ne _ _ h, list.nth_le_nth]
lemma mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} {a b : α}
(h : a ∈ l.update_nth n b), a ∈ l ∨ a = b
| [] n a b h := false.elim h
| (c::l) 0 a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
or.inr (or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _)
| (c::l) (n+1) a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
(λ h, h ▸ or.inl (mem_cons_self _ _))
(λ h, (mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth h).elim
(or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _) or.inr)
section insert_nth
variable {a : α}
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_nil (a : α) : insert_nth 0 a [] = [a] := rfl
lemma length_insert_nth : ∀n as, n ≤ length as → length (insert_nth n a as) = length as + 1
| 0 as h := rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := congr_arg nat.succ $ length_insert_nth n as (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
lemma remove_nth_insert_nth (n:ℕ) (l : list α) : (l.insert_nth n a).remove_nth n = l :=
by rw [remove_nth_eq_nth_tail, insert_nth, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same];
from modify_nth_tail_id _ _
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≥ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth (m + 1) a).remove_nth n
| 0 0 [] has _ := (lt_irrefl _ has).elim
| 0 0 (a::as) has hmn := by simp [remove_nth, insert_nth]
| 0 (m+1) (a::as) has hmn := rfl
| (n+1) (m+1) (a::as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≤ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth m a).remove_nth (n + 1)
| n 0 (a :: as) has hmn := rfl
| (n + 1) (m + 1) (a :: as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_comm (a b : α) :
∀(i j : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≤ length l),
(l.insert_nth i a).insert_nth (j + 1) b = (l.insert_nth j b).insert_nth i a
| 0 j l := by simp [insert_nth]
| (i + 1) 0 l := assume h, (nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
| (i + 1) (j+1) [] := by simp
| (i + 1) (j+1) (c::l) :=
assume h₀ h₁,
by simp [insert_nth];
exact insert_nth_comm i j l (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₀) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₁)
lemma mem_insert_nth {a b : α} : ∀ {n : ℕ} {l : list α} (hi : n ≤ l.length),
a ∈ l.insert_nth n b ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l
| 0 as h := iff.rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := begin
dsimp [list.insert_nth],
erw [list.mem_cons_iff, mem_insert_nth (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h), list.mem_cons_iff,
← or.assoc, or_comm (a = a'), or.assoc]
end
end insert_nth
/-! ### map -/
@[simp] lemma map_nil (f : α → β) : map f [] = [] := rfl
lemma map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h in
by rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
lemma map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : list α} : map f l = map g l ↔ (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_congr⟩, intros h x hx,
rw [mem_iff_nth_le] at hx, rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩,
rw [nth_le_map_rev f, nth_le_map_rev g], congr, exact h
end
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : list α) : map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]; split; refl
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : list α) : map f l = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (map g l) = foldl (λx y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldl]]
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldr f a (map g l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldr]]
theorem foldl_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : α → γ → α) (op' : β → γ → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀a x, f (op a x) = op' (f a) x) : foldl op' (f a) l = f (foldl op a l) :=
eq.symm $ by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldl]] }
theorem foldr_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : γ → α → α) (op' : γ → β → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀x a, f (op x a) = op' x (f a)) : foldr op' (f a) l = f (foldr op a l) :=
by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldr]] }
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero $ by rw [← length_map f l, h]; refl
@[simp] theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : list (list α)) :
map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
l.bind (list.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
by unfold list.bind; induction l; simp only [map, join, list.ret, cons_append, nil_append, *];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) : f <$> l = map f l := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : injective (map f) ↔ injective f :=
begin
split; intros h x y hxy,
{ suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, simp [hxy] },
{ induction y generalizing x, simpa using hxy,
cases x, simpa using hxy, simp at hxy, simp [y_ih hxy.2, h hxy.1] }
end
/-! ### map₂ -/
theorem nil_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (l : list β) : map₂ f [] l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) : map₂ f l [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
/-! ### take, drop -/
@[simp] theorem take_zero (l : list α) : take 0 l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_nil : ∀ n, take n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : list α) : take (succ n) (a::l) = a :: take n l := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_length : ∀ (l : list α), take (length l) l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin change a :: (take (length l) l) = a :: l, rw take_length end
theorem take_all_of_le : ∀ {n} {l : list α}, length l ≤ n → take n l = l
| 0 [] h := rfl
| 0 (a::l) h := absurd h (not_le_of_gt (zero_lt_succ _))
| (n+1) [] h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h :=
begin
change a :: take n l = a :: l,
rw [take_all_of_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
end
@[simp] theorem take_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, take (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := congr_arg (cons a) (take_left l₁ l₂)
theorem take_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take_left
theorem take_take : ∀ (n m) (l : list α), take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l
| n 0 l := by rw [min_zero, take_zero, take_nil]
| 0 m l := by rw [zero_min, take_zero, take_zero]
| (succ n) (succ m) nil := by simp only [take_nil]
| (succ n) (succ m) (a::l) := by simp only [take, min_succ_succ, take_take n m l]; split; refl
theorem take_repeat (a : α) : ∀ (n m : ℕ), take n (repeat a m) = repeat a (min n m)
| n 0 := by simp
| 0 m := by simp
| (succ n) (succ m) := by simp [min_succ_succ, take_repeat]
lemma map_take {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).map f = (L.map f).take i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_take], }
lemma take_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ},
n ≤ l₁.length → (l₁ ++ l₂).take n = l₁.take n
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [list.take, list.cons_append, list.take, take_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Taking the first `l₁.length + i` elements in `l₁ ++ l₂` is the same as appending the first
`i` elements of `l₂` to `l₁`. -/
lemma take_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
take (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ (take i l₂) :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, take_cons, l₁_ih, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
end
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_take (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le (L.take j) i (by { rw length_take, exact lt_min hj hi }) :=
by { rw nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm hi, exact nth_le_append _ _ }
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_take' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < (L.take j).length) :
nth_le (L.take j) i hi = nth_le L i (lt_of_lt_of_le hi (by simp [le_refl])) :=
by { simp at hi, rw nth_le_take L _ hi.1 }
@[simp] theorem drop_nil : ∀ n, drop n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_one : ∀ l : list α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := rfl
theorem drop_add : ∀ m n (l : list α), drop (m + n) l = drop m (drop n l)
| m 0 l := rfl
| m (n+1) [] := (drop_nil _).symm
| m (n+1) (a::l) := drop_add m n _
@[simp] theorem drop_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, drop (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := drop_left l₁ l₂
theorem drop_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
drop n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂ :=
by rw ← h; apply drop_left
theorem drop_eq_nth_le_cons : ∀ {n} {l : list α} h,
drop n l = nth_le l n h :: drop (n+1) l
| 0 (a::l) h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := @drop_eq_nth_le_cons n _ _
@[simp] lemma drop_length (l : list α) : l.drop l.length = [] :=
calc l.drop l.length = (l ++ []).drop l.length : by simp
... = [] : drop_left _ _
lemma drop_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l₁.length →
(l₁ ++ l₂).drop n = l₁.drop n ++ l₂
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [drop, cons_append, drop, drop_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Dropping the elements up to `l₁.length + i` in `l₁ + l₂` is the same as dropping the elements
up to `i` in `l₂`. -/
lemma drop_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
drop (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = drop i l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, drop, l₁_ih]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : i + j < L.length) :
nth_le L (i + j) h = nth_le (L.drop i) j
begin
have A : i < L.length := lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h,
rw (take_append_drop i L).symm at h,
simpa only [le_of_lt A, min_eq_left, add_lt_add_iff_left, length_take, length_append] using h
end :=
begin
have A : length (take i L) = i, by simp [le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h)],
rw [nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm h, nth_le_append_right];
simp [A]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : j < (L.drop i).length) :
nth_le (L.drop i) j h = nth_le L (i + j) (nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left ((length_drop i L) ▸ h)) :=
by rw nth_le_drop
@[simp] theorem drop_drop (n : ℕ) : ∀ (m) (l : list α), drop n (drop m l) = drop (n + m) l
| m [] := by simp
| 0 l := by simp
| (m+1) (a::l) :=
calc drop n (drop (m + 1) (a :: l)) = drop n (drop m l) : rfl
... = drop (n + m) l : drop_drop m l
... = drop (n + (m + 1)) (a :: l) : rfl
theorem drop_take : ∀ (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (l : list α),
drop m (take (m + n) l) = take n (drop m l)
| 0 n _ := by simp
| (m+1) n nil := by simp
| (m+1) n (_::l) :=
have h: m + 1 + n = (m+n) + 1, by ac_refl,
by simpa [take_cons, h] using drop_take m n l
lemma map_drop {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.drop i).map f = (L.map f).drop i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_drop], }
theorem modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop (f : list α → list α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modify_nth_tail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := H.symm
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons b) (modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop n l)
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ modify_head f (drop n l) :=
modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ f (nth_le l n h) :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [modify_nth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_nth_le_cons h]; refl
theorem update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
update_nth l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
@[simp] lemma update_nth_eq_nil (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : l.update_nth n a = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by cases l; cases n; simp only [update_nth]
section take'
variable [inhabited α]
@[simp] theorem take'_length : ∀ n l, length (@take' α _ n l) = n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) l := congr_arg succ (take'_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem take'_nil : ∀ n, take' n (@nil α) = repeat (default _) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := congr_arg (cons _) (take'_nil _)
theorem take'_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : list α},
n ≤ length l → take' n l = take n l
| 0 l h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := congr_arg (cons _) $
take'_eq_take $ le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp] theorem take'_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : take' (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(take'_eq_take (by simp only [length_append, nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem take'_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take' n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take'_left
end take'
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
lemma foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α)
{l : list β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih generalizing a, {refl},
unfold foldl,
rw [ih (λ a b bin, H a b $ mem_cons_of_mem _ bin), H a hd (mem_cons_self _ _)]
end
lemma foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β)
{l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih, {refl},
simp only [mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq] at H,
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
end
@[simp] theorem foldl_nil (f : α → β → α) (a : α) : foldl f a [] = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (b : β) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (b::l) = foldl f (f a b) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : foldr f b [] = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
foldr f b (a::l) = f a (foldr f b l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_append (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list β), foldl f a (l₁++l₂) = foldl f (foldl f a l₁) l₂
| a [] l₂ := rfl
| a (b::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldl_append (f a b) l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldr_append (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (l₁ l₂ : list α), foldr f b (l₁++l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁
| b [] l₂ := rfl
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldr_cons, foldr_append b l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : list (list β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_join (foldl f a l) L]
@[simp] theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : list (list α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (λ l b, foldr f b l) b L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldr_append, foldr_join a L, foldr_cons]
theorem foldl_reverse (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (reverse l) = foldr (λx y, f y x) a l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, foldr]]
theorem foldr_reverse (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (l : list α) :
foldr f a (reverse l) = foldl (λx y, f y x) a l :=
let t := foldl_reverse (λx y, f y x) a (reverse l) in
by rw reverse_reverse l at t; rwa t
@[simp] theorem foldr_eta : ∀ (l : list α), foldr cons [] l = l
| [] := rfl
| (x::l) := by simp only [foldr_cons, foldr_eta l]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_foldl {l : list α} : reverse (foldl (λ t h, h :: t) [] l) = l :=
by rw ←foldr_reverse; simp
/- scanl -/
lemma length_scanl {β : Type*} {f : α → β → α} :
∀ a l, length (scanl f a l) = l.length + 1
| a [] := rfl
| a (x :: l) := by erw [length_cons, length_cons, length_scanl]
/- scanr -/
@[simp] theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] := rfl
@[simp] theorem scanr_aux_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α),
scanr_aux f b (a::l) = (foldr f b (a::l), scanr f b l)
| a [] := rfl
| a (x::l) := let t := scanr_aux_cons x l in
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux, t, foldr_cons]
@[simp] theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
scanr f b (a::l) = foldr f b (a::l) :: scanr f b l :=
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux_cons, foldr_cons]; split; refl
section foldl_eq_foldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variables {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : commutative f) (hassoc : associative f)
include hassoc
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l++[b]) = foldr f b (a::l)
| a b nil := rfl
| a b (c :: l) :=
by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw hassoc
include hcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a b nil := hcomm a b
| a b (c::l) := by simp only [foldl_cons];
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc, right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; refl
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a nil := rfl
| a (b :: l) :=
by simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw (foldl_eq_foldr a l)
end foldl_eq_foldr
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → α}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldl,foldl,foldl,← foldl_eq_of_comm',foldl,hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| a [] := rfl
| a (b :: l) := by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf,foldr,foldl_eq_foldr']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → β}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)
include hf
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldr f a (b::l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldr,foldr,foldr,hf,← foldr_eq_of_comm']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [ha : is_associative α op] [hc : is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
include ha
lemma foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * (l <*> a₂)
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ :=
calc a::l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = l <*> (a₁ * (a₂ * a)) : by simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
... = a₁ * (a::l <*> a₂) : by rw [foldl_assoc, foldl_cons]
lemma foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc : ∀{l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * l.foldr (*) a₂
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ := by simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc];
rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
include hc
lemma foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : list α} {a₁ a₂} : (a₁ :: l) <*> a₂ = a₁ * (l <*> a₂) :=
by rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### mfoldl, mfoldr -/
section mfoldl_mfoldr
variables {m : Type v → Type w} [monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_nil (f : β → α → m β) {b} : mfoldl f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_nil (f : α → β → m β) {b} : mfoldr f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_cons {f : β → α → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldl f b (a :: l) = f b a >>= λ b', mfoldl f b' l := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_cons {f : α → β → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldr f b (a :: l) = mfoldr f b l >>= f a := rfl
variables [is_lawful_monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_append {f : β → α → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldl f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldl f b l₁ >>= λ x, mfoldl f x l₂
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldl_nil, pure_bind]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [cons_append, mfoldl_cons, mfoldl_append, bind_assoc]
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_append {f : α → β → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldr f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldr f b l₂ >>= λ x, mfoldr f x l₁
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldr_nil, bind_pure]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [mfoldr_cons, cons_append, mfoldr_append, bind_assoc]
end mfoldl_mfoldr
/-! ### prod and sum -/
-- list.sum was already defined in defs.lean, but we couldn't tag it with `to_additive` yet.
attribute [to_additive] list.prod
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α}
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_nil : ([] : list α).prod = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_singleton : [a].prod = a := one_mul a
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_cons : (a::l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc (a::l).prod = foldl (*) (a * 1) l : by simp only [list.prod, foldl_cons, one_mul, mul_one]
... = _ : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (*) (foldl (*) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ : by simp [list.prod]
... = l₁.prod * l₂.prod : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_join {l : list (list α)} : l.join.prod = (l.map list.prod).prod :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, list.join, map, prod_append, prod_cons]]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldr : l.prod = foldr (*) 1 l :=
list.rec_on l rfl $ λ a l ihl, by rw [prod_cons, foldr_cons, ihl]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (l : list α) {r : β → γ → Prop}
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀⦃a b c⦄, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (l.map f).prod (l.map g).prod :=
list.rec_on l h₁ (λ a l hl, by simp only [map_cons, prod_cons, h₂ hl])
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom [monoid β] (l : list α) (f : α → β) [is_monoid_hom f] :
(l.map f).prod = f l.prod :=
by { simp only [prod, foldl_map, (is_monoid_hom.map_one f).symm],
exact l.foldl_hom _ _ _ 1 (is_monoid_hom.map_mul f) }
-- `to_additive` chokes on the next few lemmas, so we do them by hand below
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_mul_prod_drop :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).prod * (L.drop i).prod = L.prod
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, mul_assoc, prod_take_mul_prod_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_succ :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).prod = (L.take i).prod * L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, prod_take_succ, mul_assoc], }
/-- A list with product not one must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_prod_ne_one (L : list α) (h : L.prod ≠ 1) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
end monoid
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_add_sum_drop [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).sum + (L.drop i).sum = L.sum
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, add_assoc, sum_take_add_sum_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_succ [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L.take i).sum + L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, sum_take_succ, add_assoc], }
lemma eq_of_sum_take_eq [add_left_cancel_monoid α] {L L' : list α} (h : L.length = L'.length)
(h' : ∀ i ≤ L.length, (L.take i).sum = (L'.take i).sum) : L = L' :=
begin
apply ext_le h (λ i h₁ h₂, _),
have : (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L'.take (i + 1)).sum := h' _ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁),
rw [sum_take_succ L i h₁, sum_take_succ L' i h₂, h' i (le_of_lt h₁)] at this,
exact add_left_cancel this
end
lemma monotone_sum_take [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] (L : list α) :
monotone (λ i, (L.take i).sum) :=
begin
apply monotone_of_monotone_nat (λ n, _),
by_cases h : n < L.length,
{ rw sum_take_succ _ _ h,
exact le_add_right (le_refl _) },
{ push_neg at h,
simp [take_all_of_le h, take_all_of_le (le_trans h (nat.le_succ _))] }
end
/-- A list with sum not zero must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero [add_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : L.sum ≠ 0) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
/-- If all elements in a list are bounded below by `1`, then the length of the list is bounded
by the sum of the elements. -/
lemma length_le_sum_of_one_le (L : list ℕ) (h : ∀ i ∈ L, 1 ≤ i) : L.length ≤ L.sum :=
begin
induction L with j L IH h, { simp },
rw [sum_cons, length, add_comm],
exact add_le_add (h _ (set.mem_insert _ _)) (IH (λ i hi, h i (set.mem_union_right _ hi)))
end
-- Now we tie those lemmas back to their multiplicative versions.
attribute [to_additive] prod_take_mul_prod_drop prod_take_succ length_pos_of_prod_ne_one
/-- A list with positive sum must have positive length. -/
-- This is an easy consequence of `length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero`, but often useful in applications.
lemma length_pos_of_sum_pos [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : 0 < L.sum) :
0 < L.length :=
length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero L (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_erase [decidable_eq α] [comm_monoid α] {a} :
Π {l : list α}, a ∈ l → a * (l.erase a).prod = l.prod
| (b::l) h :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem h with rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩,
{ simp only [list.erase, if_pos, prod_cons] },
{ simp only [list.erase, if_neg (mt eq.symm ne), prod_cons, prod_erase h, mul_left_comm a b] }
end
lemma dvd_prod [comm_semiring α] {a} {l : list α} (ha : a ∈ l) : a ∣ l.prod :=
let ⟨s, t, h⟩ := mem_split ha in
by rw [h, prod_append, prod_cons, mul_left_comm]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
@[simp] theorem sum_const_nat (m n : ℕ) : sum (list.repeat m n) = m * n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sum_cons, nat.mul_succ, add_comm]]
theorem dvd_sum [comm_semiring α] {a} {l : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, a ∣ x) : a ∣ l.sum :=
begin
induction l with x l ih,
{ exact dvd_zero _ },
{ rw [list.sum_cons],
exact dvd_add (h _ (mem_cons_self _ _)) (ih (λ x hx, h x (mem_cons_of_mem _ hx))) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_join (L : list (list α)) : length (join L) = sum (map length L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, sum_cons, length_append]]
@[simp] theorem length_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) :
length (list.bind l f) = sum (map (length ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [list.bind, length_join, map_map]
lemma exists_lt_of_sum_lt [decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum < (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x < g x :=
begin
induction l with x l,
{ exfalso, exact lt_irrefl _ h },
{ by_cases h' : f x < g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases l_ih _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩, refine ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left (lt_of_lt_of_le h $ add_le_add_right (le_of_not_gt h') _) }
end
lemma exists_le_of_sum_le [decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(hl : l ≠ []) (f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum ≤ (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x ≤ g x :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ contradiction },
{ by_cases h' : f x ≤ g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases exists_lt_of_sum_lt f g _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩,
exact ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, le_of_lt h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left (lt_of_le_of_lt h $ add_lt_add_right (lt_of_not_ge h') _) }
end
-- Several lemmas about sum/head/tail for `list ℕ`.
-- These are hard to generalize well, as they rely on the fact that `default ℕ = 0`.
-- We'd like to state this as `L.head * L.tail.prod = L.prod`,
-- but because `L.head` relies on an inhabited instances and
-- returns a garbage value for the empty list, this is not possible.
-- Instead we write the statement in terms of `(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1`,
-- and below, restate the lemma just for `ℕ`.
@[to_additive]
lemma head_mul_tail_prod' [monoid α] (L : list α) :
(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1 * L.tail.prod = L.prod :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_add_tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head + L.tail.sum = L.sum :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_le_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head ≤ L.sum :=
nat.le.intro (head_add_tail_sum L)
lemma tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.tail.sum = L.sum - L.head :=
by rw [← head_add_tail_sum L, add_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel]
section
variables {G : Type*} [comm_group G]
attribute [to_additive] alternating_prod
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_nil :
alternating_prod ([] : list G) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_singleton (g : G) :
alternating_prod [g] = g := rfl
@[simp, to_additive alternating_sum_cons_cons']
lemma alternating_prod_cons_cons (g h : G) (l : list G) :
alternating_prod (g :: h :: l) = g * h⁻¹ * alternating_prod l := rfl
lemma alternating_sum_cons_cons {G : Type*} [add_comm_group G] (g h : G) (l : list G) :
alternating_sum (g :: h :: l) = g - h + alternating_sum l := rfl
end
/-! ### join -/
attribute [simp] join
theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] := iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| (l::L) := by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
@[simp] theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : list (list α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ :=
by induction L₁; [refl, simp only [*, join, cons_append, append_assoc]]
lemma join_join (l : list (list (list α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join :=
by { induction l, simp, simp [l_ih] }
/-- In a join, taking the first elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join of the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma take_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.take ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.take i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [take_append, L_ih]
end
/-- In a join, dropping all the elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join after dropping the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma drop_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.drop i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [drop_append, L_ih],
end
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le (L : list α) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.take (i+1)).drop i = [nth_le L i hi] :=
begin
induction L generalizing i,
{ simp only [length] at hi, exact (nat.not_succ_le_zero i hi).elim },
cases i, { simp },
have : i < L_tl.length,
{ simp at hi,
exact nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi },
simp [L_ih this],
refl
end
/-- In a join of sublists, taking the slice between the indices `A` and `B - 1` gives back the
original sublist of index `i` if `A` is the sum of the lenghts of sublists of index `< i`, and
`B` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `≤ i`. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le (L : list (list α)) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.join.take ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum).drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = nth_le L i hi :=
begin
have : (L.map length).take i = ((L.take (i+1)).map length).take i, by simp [map_take, take_take],
simp [take_sum_join, this, drop_sum_join, drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le _ hi]
end
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt1 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum :=
by simp [hi, sum_take_succ, hj]
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt2 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < L.join.length :=
begin
convert lt_of_lt_of_le (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj) (monotone_sum_take _ hi),
have : L.length = (L.map length).length, by simp,
simp [this, -length_map]
end
/-- The `n`-th element in a join of sublists is the `j`-th element of the `i`th sublist,
where `n` can be obtained in terms of `i` and `j` by adding the lengths of all the sublists
of index `< i`, and adding `j`. -/
lemma nth_le_join (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
nth_le L.join (((L.map length).take i).sum + j) (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) =
nth_le (nth_le L i hi) j hj :=
by rw [nth_le_take L.join (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj),
nth_le_drop, nth_le_of_eq (drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le L hi)]
/-- Two lists of sublists are equal iff their joins coincide, as well as the lengths of the
sublists. -/
theorem eq_iff_join_eq (L L' : list (list α)) :
L = L' ↔ L.join = L'.join ∧ map length L = map length L' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, by simp [H], _⟩,
rintros ⟨join_eq, length_eq⟩,
apply ext_le,
{ have : length (map length L) = length (map length L'), by rw length_eq,
simpa using this },
{ assume n h₁ h₂,
rw [← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, ← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, join_eq, length_eq] }
end
/-! ### lexicographic ordering -/
/-- Given a strict order `<` on `α`, the lexicographic strict order on `list α`, for which
`[a0, ..., an] < [b0, ..., b_k]` if `a0 < b0` or `a0 = b0` and `[a1, ..., an] < [b1, ..., bk]`.
The definition is given for any relation `r`, not only strict orders. -/
inductive lex (r : α → α → Prop) : list α → list α → Prop
| nil {a l} : lex [] (a :: l)
| cons {a l₁ l₂} (h : lex l₁ l₂) : lex (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂)
| rel {a₁ l₁ a₂ l₂} (h : r a₁ a₂) : lex (a₁ :: l₁) (a₂ :: l₂)
namespace lex
theorem cons_iff {r : α → α → Prop} [is_irrefl α r] {a l₁ l₂} :
lex r (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂) ↔ lex r l₁ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by cases h with _ _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ _ h;
[exact h, exact (irrefl_of r a h).elim], lex.cons⟩
@[simp] theorem not_nil_right (r : α → α → Prop) (l : list α) : ¬ lex r l [].
instance is_order_connected (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_order_connected α r] [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_order_connected (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| _, [], c::l₃, nil := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, rel _ := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, cons _ := or.inr nil
| _, b::l₂, c::l₃, nil := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, b::l₂, c::l₃, rel h :=
(is_order_connected.conn _ b _ h).imp rel rel
| a::l₁, b::l₂, _::l₃, cons h := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match _ l₂ _ h).imp cons cons },
{ exact or.inr (rel ab) }
end
end⟩
instance is_trichotomous (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_trichotomous (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| [], [] := or.inr (or.inl rfl)
| [], b::l₂ := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, [] := or.inr (or.inr nil)
| a::l₁, b::l₂ := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match l₁ l₂).imp cons
(or.imp (congr_arg _) cons) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr (rel ab)) }
end
end⟩
instance is_asymm (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_asymm α r] : is_asymm (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₁ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.cons h₂ := asymm h₁ h₁
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₂ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.cons h₂ :=
by exact _match _ _ h₁ h₂
end⟩
instance is_strict_total_order (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_strict_total_order' α r] : is_strict_total_order' (list α) (lex r) :=
{..is_strict_weak_order_of_is_order_connected}
instance decidable_rel [decidable_eq α] (r : α → α → Prop)
[decidable_rel r] : decidable_rel (lex r)
| l₁ [] := is_false $ λ h, by cases h
| [] (b::l₂) := is_true lex.nil
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := begin
haveI := decidable_rel l₁ l₂,
refine decidable_of_iff (r a b ∨ a = b ∧ lex r l₁ l₂) ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ rcases h with h | ⟨rfl, h⟩,
{ exact lex.rel h },
{ exact lex.cons h } },
{ rcases h with _|⟨_,_,_,h⟩|⟨_,_,_,_,h⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨rfl, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inl h } }
end
theorem append_right (r : α → α → Prop) :
∀ {s₁ s₂} t, lex r s₁ s₂ → lex r s₁ (s₂ ++ t)
| _ _ t nil := nil
| _ _ t (cons h) := cons (append_right _ h)
| _ _ t (rel r) := rel r
theorem append_left (R : α → α → Prop) {t₁ t₂} (h : lex R t₁ t₂) :
∀ s, lex R (s ++ t₁) (s ++ t₂)
| [] := h
| (a::l) := cons (append_left l)
theorem imp {r s : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) :
∀ l₁ l₂, lex r l₁ l₂ → lex s l₁ l₂
| _ _ nil := nil
| _ _ (cons h) := cons (imp _ _ h)
| _ _ (rel r) := rel (H _ _ r)
theorem to_ne : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, lex (≠) l₁ l₂ → l₁ ≠ l₂
| _ _ (cons h) e := to_ne h (list.cons.inj e).2
| _ _ (rel r) e := r (list.cons.inj e).1
theorem ne_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (H : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) :
lex (≠) l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≠ l₂ :=
⟨to_ne, λ h, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂; cases l₂ with b l₂,
{ contradiction },
{ apply nil },
{ exact (not_lt_of_ge H).elim (succ_pos _) },
{ cases classical.em (a = b) with ab ab,
{ subst b, apply cons,
exact IH (le_of_succ_le_succ H) (mt (congr_arg _) h) },
{ exact rel ab } }
end⟩
end lex
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_lt' [has_lt α] : has_lt (list α) := ⟨lex (<)⟩
theorem nil_lt_cons [has_lt α] (a : α) (l : list α) : [] < a :: l :=
lex.nil
instance [linear_order α] : linear_order (list α) :=
linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_le' [linear_order α] : has_le (list α) :=
preorder.to_has_le _
instance [decidable_linear_order α] : decidable_linear_order (list α) :=
decidable_linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
/-! ### all & any -/
@[simp] theorem all_nil (p : α → bool) : all [] p = tt := rfl
@[simp] theorem all_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
all (a::l) p = (p a && all l p) := rfl
theorem all_iff_forall {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : all l p ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
simp only [all_cons, band_coe_iff, ih, forall_mem_cons]
end
theorem all_iff_forall_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : all l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [all_iff_forall, bool.of_to_bool_iff]
@[simp] theorem any_nil (p : α → bool) : any [] p = ff := rfl
@[simp] theorem any_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
any (a::l) p = (p a || any l p) := rfl
theorem any_iff_exists {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : any l p ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_false bool.not_ff (not_exists_mem_nil _) },
simp only [any_cons, bor_coe_iff, ih, exists_mem_cons_iff]
end
theorem any_iff_exists_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : any l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [any_iff_exists]
theorem any_of_mem {p : α → bool} {a : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : any l p :=
any_iff_exists.2 ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
@[priority 500] instance decidable_forall_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∀ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ all_iff_forall_prop
instance decidable_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∃ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ any_iff_exists_prop
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
/-- Partial map. If `f : Π a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on
`a : α` satisfying `p`, then `pmap f l h` is essentially the same as `map f l`
but is defined only when all members of `l` satisfy `p`, using the proof
to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) : Π l : list α, (∀ a ∈ l, p a) → list β
| [] H := []
| (a::l) H := f a (forall_mem_cons.1 H).1 :: pmap l (forall_mem_cons.1 H).2
/-- "Attach" the proof that the elements of `l` are in `l` to produce a new list
with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ l}`. -/
def attach (l : list α) : list {x // x ∈ l} := pmap subtype.mk l (λ a, id)
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : list α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) l H = map f l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(l : list α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl, rw [pmap, pmap, h, ih]]
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) l H :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : pmap f l H = l.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l (λ a h₁ h₂, rfl)
theorem attach_map_val (l : list α) : l.attach.map subtype.val = l :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact (pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _).trans (map_id l)
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (l : list α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach | ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val]; exact h);
{ rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, m, rfl⟩, exact m }
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H b} : b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b :=
by simp only [pmap_eq_map_attach, mem_map, mem_attach, true_and, subtype.exists]
@[simp] theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, length]]
@[simp] lemma length_attach (L : list α) : L.attach.length = L.length := length_pmap
/-! ### find -/
section find
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} {a : α}
@[simp] theorem find_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : find p [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_pos (l) (h : p a) : find p (a::l) = some a :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_neg (l) (h : ¬ p a) : find p (a::l) = find p l :=
if_neg h
@[simp] theorem find_eq_none : find p l = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ¬ p x :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases h : p a,
{ simp only [find_cons_of_pos _ h, h, not_true, false_and] },
{ rwa [find_cons_of_neg _ h, iff_true_intro h, true_and] }
end
theorem find_some (H : find p l = some a) : p a :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, exact h },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact IH H }
end
@[simp] theorem find_mem (H : find p l = some a) : a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, apply mem_cons_self },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (IH H) }
end
end find
/-! ### lookmap -/
section lookmap
variables (f : α → option α)
@[simp] theorem lookmap_nil : [].lookmap f = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_none {a : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = a :: l.lookmap f :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_some {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = some b) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = b :: l :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
theorem lookmap_some : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap some = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := rfl
theorem lookmap_none : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap (λ _, none) = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := congr_arg (cons a) (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_congr {f g : α → option α} :
∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a ∈ l, f a = g a) → l.lookmap f = l.lookmap g
| [] H := rfl
| (a::l) H := begin
cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂,
cases h : g a with b,
{ simp [h, H₁.trans h, lookmap_congr H₂] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, lookmap_cons_some _ _ (H₁.trans h)] }
end
theorem lookmap_of_forall_not {l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, f a = none) : l.lookmap f = l :=
(lookmap_congr H).trans (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_map_eq (g : α → β) (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), g a = g b) :
∀ l : list α, map g (l.lookmap f) = map g l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin
cases h' : f a with b,
{ simp [h', lookmap_map_eq] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h', h _ _ h'] }
end
theorem lookmap_id' (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), a = b) (l : list α) : l.lookmap f = l :=
by rw [← map_id (l.lookmap f), lookmap_map_eq, map_id]; exact h
theorem length_lookmap (l : list α) : length (l.lookmap f) = length l :=
by rw [← length_map, lookmap_map_eq _ (λ _, ()), length_map]; simp
end lookmap
/-! ### filter_map -/
@[simp] theorem filter_map_nil (f : α → option β) : filter_map f [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (l : list α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = b :: filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]; split; refl
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
simp only [filter_map_cons_some (some ∘ f) _ _ rfl, IH, map_cons], split; refl
end
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
by_cases pa : p a,
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_pos pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ pa], split; refl },
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_neg pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ pa] }
end
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) l :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
cases h : f a with b,
{ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, filter_map_cons_none, IH],
simp only [h, option.none_bind'] },
rw filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h,
cases h' : g b with c;
[ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h', filter_map_cons_none, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h', filter_map_cons_some, IH] ];
simp only [h, h', option.some_bind']
end
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (map f l) = filter_map (g ∘ f) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (filter p l) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map], congr,
funext x,
show (option.guard p x).bind f = ite (p x) (f x) none,
by_cases h : p x,
{ simp only [option.guard, if_pos h, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [option.guard, if_neg h, option.none_bind'] }
end
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (l : list α) : filter_map some l = l :=
by rw filter_map_eq_map; apply map_id
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = some b :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ split, { intro H, cases H }, { rintro ⟨_, H, _⟩, cases H } },
cases h : f a with b',
{ have : f a ≠ some b, {rw h, intro, contradiction},
simp only [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left, this, false_or] },
{ have : f a = some b ↔ b = b',
{ split; intro t, {rw t at h; injection h}, {exact t.symm ▸ h} },
simp only [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this, exists_eq_left] }
end
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = l :=
by simp only [map_filter_map, H, filter_map_some]
theorem sublist.filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter_map f l₁ <+ filter_map f l₂ :=
by induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH;
simp only [filter_map]; cases f a with b;
simp only [filter_map, IH, sublist.cons, sublist.cons2]
theorem sublist.map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_map f ▸ s.filter_map _
/-! ### filter -/
section filter
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
lemma filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
: ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, p x ↔ q x) → filter p l = filter q l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := by rw forall_mem_cons at h; by_cases pa : p a;
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ (h.1.1 pa), filter_congr h.2],
simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ (mt h.1.2 pa), filter_congr h.2]];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (l : list α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
(filter_sublist l).subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → p a
| (b::l) ain :=
if pb : p b then
have a ∈ b :: filter p l, by simpa only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb] using ain,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, begin rw [← this] at pb, exact pb end)
(assume : a ∈ filter p l, of_mem_filter this)
else
begin simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb] at ain, exact (of_mem_filter ain) end
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → a ∈ filter p l
| (_::l) (or.inl rfl) pa := by rw filter_cons_of_pos _ pa; apply mem_cons_self
| (b::l) (or.inr ain) pa := if pb : p b
then by rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb]; apply mem_cons_of_mem; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
else by rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb]; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {l} : a ∈ filter p l ↔ a ∈ l ∧ p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_mem_filter h, of_mem_filter h⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, mem_filter_of_mem h₁ h₂⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases p a,
{ rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, cons_inj, ih, and_iff_right h] },
{ rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h],
refine iff_of_false _ (mt and.left h), intro e,
have := filter_sublist l, rw e at this,
exact not_lt_of_ge (length_le_of_sublist this) (lt_succ_self _) }
end
theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬p a :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter, not_and]
theorem filter_sublist_filter {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_filter p ▸ s.filter_map _
theorem filter_of_map (f : β → α) (l) : filter p (map f l) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_filter_map, filter_map_filter]; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] : ∀ l,
filter p (filter q l) = filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := by by_cases hp : p a; by_cases hq : q a; simp only [hp, hq, filter, if_true, if_false,
true_and, false_and, filter_filter l, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp] lemma filter_true {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, true)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, true) h l = l :=
by convert filter_eq_self.2 (λ _ _, trivial)
@[simp] lemma filter_false {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, false)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, false) h l = [] :=
by convert filter_eq_nil.2 (λ _ _, id)
@[simp] theorem span_eq_take_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
∀ (l : list α), span p l = (take_while p l, drop_while p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) :=
if pa : p a then by simp only [span, if_pos pa, span_eq_take_drop l, take_while, drop_while]
else by simp only [span, take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa]
@[simp] theorem take_while_append_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
∀ (l : list α), take_while p l ++ drop_while p l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := if pa : p a then by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_pos pa, if_pos pa, cons_append,
take_while_append_drop l]
else by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa, if_neg pa, nil_append]
@[simp] theorem countp_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : countp p [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (l) (pa : p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l + 1 :=
if_pos pa
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (l) (pa : ¬ p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l :=
if_neg pa
theorem countp_eq_length_filter (l) : countp p l = length (filter p l) :=
by induction l with x l ih; [refl, by_cases (p x)];
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, countp, ih, if_pos h],
simp only [countp_cons_of_neg _ h, ih, filter_cons_of_neg _ h]]; refl
local attribute [simp] countp_eq_length_filter
@[simp] theorem countp_append (l₁ l₂) : countp p (l₁ ++ l₂) = countp p l₁ + countp p l₂ :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_append, length_append]
theorem countp_pos {l} : 0 < countp p l ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, length_pos_iff_exists_mem, mem_filter, exists_prop]
theorem countp_le_of_sublist {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂ :=
by simpa only [countp_eq_length_filter] using length_le_of_sublist (filter_sublist_filter s)
@[simp] theorem countp_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (l : list α) :
countp p (filter q l) = countp (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_filter]
end filter
/-! ### count -/
section count
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = if a = b then succ (count a l) else count a l := rfl
theorem count_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + (if a = b then 1 else 0) :=
begin rw count_cons, split_ifs; refl end
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (a::l) = succ (count a l) :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (l : list α) : count a (b::l) = count a l :=
if_neg h
theorem count_tail : Π (l : list α) (a : α) (h : 0 < l.length),
l.tail.count a = l.count a - ite (a = list.nth_le l 0 h) 1 0
| (_ :: _) a h := by { rw [count_cons], split_ifs; simp }
theorem count_le_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂} : l₁ <+ l₂ → count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
countp_le_of_sublist
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
count_le_of_sublist _ (sublist_cons _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 := if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂ :=
countp_append
theorem count_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) :=
by simp [-add_comm]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {l : list α} : 0 < count a l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simp only [count, countp_pos, exists_prop, exists_eq_right']
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
λ h', ne_of_gt (count_pos.2 h') h
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by rw [count, countp_eq_length_filter, filter_eq_self.2, length_repeat];
exact λ b m, (eq_of_mem_repeat m).symm
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_sublist {a : α} {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ count a l ↔ repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ h, ((repeat_sublist_repeat a).2 h).trans $
have filter (eq a) l = repeat a (count a l), from eq_repeat.2
⟨by simp only [count, countp_eq_length_filter], λ b m, (of_mem_filter m).symm⟩,
by rw ← this; apply filter_sublist,
λ h, by simpa only [count_repeat] using count_le_of_sublist a h⟩
@[simp] theorem count_filter {p} [decidable_pred p]
{a} {l : list α} (h : p a) : count a (filter p l) = count a l :=
by simp only [count, countp_filter]; congr; exact
set.ext (λ b, and_iff_left_of_imp (λ e, e ▸ h))
end count
/-! ### prefix, suffix, infix -/
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append' (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃) :=
by rw ← list.append_assoc; apply infix_append
theorem nil_prefix (l : list α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : list α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem prefix_refl (l : list α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem suffix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
theorem prefix_concat (a : α) (l) : l <+: concat l a := by simp
theorem infix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem infix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨t, [], by simp only [h, append_nil]⟩
@[refl] theorem infix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ prefix_refl l
theorem nil_infix (l : list α) : [] <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ nil_prefix l
theorem infix_cons {L₁ L₂ : list α} {x : α} : L₁ <:+: L₂ → L₁ <:+: x :: L₂ :=
λ⟨LP, LS, H⟩, ⟨x :: LP, LS, H ▸ rfl⟩
@[trans] theorem is_prefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
@[trans] theorem is_suffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
@[trans] theorem is_infix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
theorem sublist_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
λ⟨s, t, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact (sublist_append_right _ _).trans (sublist_append_left _ _)
theorem sublist_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_prefix
theorem sublist_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_suffix
theorem reverse_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r,
by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
theorem reverse_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
by rw ← reverse_suffix; simp only [reverse_reverse]
theorem length_le_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ ≤ length l₂ :=
length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_infix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_sublist_nil $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_prefix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_prefix s
theorem eq_nil_of_suffix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_suffix s
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨λ⟨s, t, e⟩, ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, by rw [← e, append_assoc]; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
λ⟨._, ⟨t, rfl⟩, ⟨s, e⟩⟩, ⟨s, t, by rw append_assoc; exact e⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_infix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_of_prefix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_prefix s
theorem eq_of_suffix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_suffix s
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α},
l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [] l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ _ := nil_prefix _
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) _ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, e⟩ ll := begin
injection e with _ e', subst b,
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩
(le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
end
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 $ prefix_of_prefix_length_le
(reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp
reverse_prefix.1 reverse_prefix.1
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : list (list α)} {l}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| (_ :: L) l (or.inl rfl) := infix_append [] _ _
| (l' :: L) l (or.inr h) :=
is_infix.trans (infix_of_mem_join h) $ infix_of_suffix $ suffix_append _ _
theorem prefix_append_right_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr $ λ r, by rw [append_assoc, append_right_inj]
theorem prefix_cons_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_right_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : list α) : take n l <+: l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : list α) : drop n l <:+ l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem tail_suffix (l : list α) : tail l <:+ l := by rw ← drop_one; apply drop_suffix
theorem tail_subset (l : list α) : tail l ⊆ l := (sublist_of_suffix (tail_suffix l)).subset
theorem prefix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ ++ drop (length l₁) l₂ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; rw drop_left, λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ take (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ ++ l₁ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; simp only [length_append, nat.add_sub_cancel, take_left], λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_take {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ = take (length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_right_cancel $
(prefix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ take_prefix _ _⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_drop {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ l₁ = drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_left_cancel $
(suffix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ drop_suffix _ _⟩
instance decidable_prefix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_iff _ _ (by rw [← h, prefix_cons_inj])
(decidable_prefix l₁ l₂)
else
is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, h $ by injection te
-- Alternatively, use mem_tails
instance decidable_suffix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, append_nil _⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ mt (length_le_of_sublist ∘ sublist_of_suffix) dec_trivial
| l₁ l₂ := let len1 := length l₁, len2 := length l₂ in
if hl : len1 ≤ len2 then
decidable_of_iff' (l₁ = drop (len2-len1) l₂) suffix_iff_eq_drop
else is_false $ λ h, hl $ length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_suffix h
@[simp] theorem mem_inits : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ inits t ↔ s <+: t
| s [] := suffices s = nil ↔ s <+: nil, by simpa only [inits, mem_singleton],
⟨λh, h.symm ▸ prefix_refl [], eq_nil_of_prefix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) :=
suffices (s = nil ∨ ∃ l ∈ inits t, a :: l = s) ↔ s <+: a :: t, by simpa,
⟨λo, match s, o with
| ._, or.inl rfl := ⟨_, rfl⟩
| s, or.inr ⟨r, hr, hs⟩ := let ⟨s, ht⟩ := (mem_inits _ _).1 hr in
by rw [← hs, ← ht]; exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
end, λmi, match s, mi with
| [], ⟨._, rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| (b::s), ⟨r, hr⟩ := list.no_confusion hr $ λba (st : s++r = t), or.inr $
by rw ba; exact ⟨_, (mem_inits _ _).2 ⟨_, st⟩, rfl⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_tails : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ tails t ↔ s <:+ t
| s [] := by simp only [tails, mem_singleton];
exact ⟨λh, by rw h; exact suffix_refl [], eq_nil_of_suffix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) := by simp only [tails, mem_cons_iff, mem_tails s t];
exact show s = a :: t ∨ s <:+ t ↔ s <:+ a :: t, from
⟨λo, match s, t, o with
| ._, t, or.inl rfl := suffix_refl _
| s, ._, or.inr ⟨l, rfl⟩ := ⟨a::l, rfl⟩
end, λe, match s, t, e with
| ._, t, ⟨[], rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| s, t, ⟨b::l, he⟩ := list.no_confusion he (λab lt, or.inr ⟨l, lt⟩)
end⟩
instance decidable_infix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨[], l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨s, t, te⟩, absurd te $ append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left _ _ $
append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ _ $ λh, list.no_confusion h
| l₁ l₂ := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (list.decidable_bex (λt, l₁ <+: t) (tails l₂)) $
by refine (exists_congr (λt, _)).trans (infix_iff_prefix_suffix _ _).symm;
exact ⟨λ⟨h1, h2⟩, ⟨h2, (mem_tails _ _).1 h1⟩, λ⟨h2, h1⟩, ⟨(mem_tails _ _).2 h1, h2⟩⟩
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem map_sublists'_aux (g : list β → list γ) (l : list α) (f r) :
map g (sublists'_aux l f r) = sublists'_aux l (g ∘ f) (map g r) :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_append (r' : list (list β)) (l : list α) (f r) :
sublists'_aux l f (r ++ r') = sublists'_aux l f r ++ r' :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_eq_sublists' (l f r) :
@sublists'_aux α β l f r = map f (sublists' l) ++ r :=
by rw [sublists', map_sublists'_aux, ← sublists'_aux_append]; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) :=
by rw [sublists', sublists'_aux]; simp only [sublists'_aux_eq_sublists', map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists' {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t :=
begin
induction t with a t IH generalizing s,
{ simp only [sublists'_nil, mem_singleton],
exact ⟨λ h, by rw h, eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩ },
simp only [sublists'_cons, mem_append, IH, mem_map],
split; intro h, rcases h with h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩,
{ exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ h },
{ exact cons_sublist_cons _ h },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h s _ _ h,
{ exact or.inl h },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, h, rfl⟩ } }
end
@[simp] theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : list α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [sublists'_cons, length_append, length_sublists' l, length_map,
length, nat.pow_succ, mul_succ, mul_zero, zero_add]
@[simp] theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux : ∀ l (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ l f = sublists_aux l (λ ys r, f ys ++ r)
| [] f := rfl
| (a::l) f := by rw [sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux]; simp only [*, append_assoc]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁ (l : list α) :
sublists_aux l cons = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, [x]) :=
by rw [sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux]; refl
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux {a : α} {l : list α}
(IH₁ : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β), sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(IH₂ : ∀ (f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(f : list α → list β → list β) : sublists_aux (a::l) f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux (a::l) cons) :=
begin
simp only [sublists_aux, foldr_cons], rw [IH₂, IH₁], congr' 1,
induction sublists_aux l cons with _ _ ih, {refl},
simp only [ih, foldr_cons]
end
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr (l : list α) : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
suffices _ ∧ ∀ f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons),
from this.1,
begin
induction l with a l IH, {split; intro; refl},
exact ⟨sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.1 IH.2,
sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.2 IH.2⟩
end
theorem sublists_aux_cons_cons (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists_aux (a::l) cons = [a] :: foldr (λys r, ys :: (a :: ys) :: r) [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
by rw [← sublists_aux_eq_foldr]; refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_append : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α) (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ (l₁ ++ l₂) f = sublists_aux₁ l₁ f ++
sublists_aux₁ l₂ (λ x, f x ++ sublists_aux₁ l₁ (f ∘ (++ x)))
| [] l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, nil_append, append_nil]
| (a::l₁) l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, cons_append, sublists_aux₁_append l₁, append_assoc];
refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_concat (l : list α) (a : α) (f : list α → list β) :
sublists_aux₁ (l ++ [a]) f = sublists_aux₁ l f ++
f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, f (x ++ [a])) :=
by simp only [sublists_aux₁_append, sublists_aux₁, append_assoc, append_nil]
theorem sublists_aux₁_bind : ∀ (l : list α)
(f : list α → list β) (g : β → list γ),
(sublists_aux₁ l f).bind g = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, (f x).bind g)
| [] f g := rfl
| (a::l) f g := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, bind_append, sublists_aux₁_bind l]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists_aux (l₁ ++ l₂) cons = sublists_aux l₁ cons ++
(do x ← sublists_aux l₂ cons, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
begin
simp only [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux₁_append, bind_eq_bind,
sublists_aux₁_bind],
congr, funext x, apply congr_arg _,
rw [← bind_ret_eq_map, sublists_aux₁_bind], exact (append_nil _).symm
end
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (do x ← sublists l₂, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
by simp only [map, sublists, sublists_aux_cons_append, map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind,
cons_bind, map_id', append_nil, cons_append, map_id' (λ _, rfl)]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists_concat (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (λ x, x ++ [a]) (sublists l) :=
by rw [sublists_append, sublists_singleton, bind_eq_bind, cons_bind, cons_bind, nil_bind,
map_eq_map, map_eq_map, map_id' (append_nil), append_nil]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : list α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) :=
by induction l with hd tl ih; [refl,
simp only [reverse_cons, sublists_append, sublists'_cons, map_append, ih, sublists_singleton,
map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind, map_map, cons_bind, append_nil, nil_bind, (∘)]]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : list α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : list α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', map_map, map_id' (reverse_reverse)]
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : list α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists_aux_ne_nil : ∀ (l : list α), [] ∉ sublists_aux l cons
| [] := id
| (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_aux_cons_cons],
refine not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (cons_ne_nil _ _).symm _,
have := sublists_aux_ne_nil l, revert this,
induction sublists_aux l cons; intro, {rwa foldr},
simp only [foldr, mem_cons_iff, false_or, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨ne_of_not_mem_cons this, ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons this)⟩
end
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t :=
by rw [← reverse_sublist_iff, ← mem_sublists',
sublists'_reverse, mem_map_of_injective reverse_injective]
@[simp] theorem length_sublists (l : list α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', length_map, length_sublists', length_reverse]
theorem map_ret_sublist_sublists (l : list α) : map list.ret l <+ sublists l :=
reverse_rec_on l (nil_sublist _) $
λ l a IH, by simp only [map, map_append, sublists_concat]; exact
((append_sublist_append_left _).2 $ singleton_sublist.2 $
mem_map.2 ⟨[], mem_sublists.2 (nil_sublist _), by refl⟩).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 IH)
/-! ### sublists_len -/
/-- Auxiliary function to construct the list of all sublists of a given length. Given an
integer `n`, a list `l`, a function `f` and an auxiliary list `L`, it returns the list made of
of `f` applied to all sublists of `l` of length `n`, concatenated with `L`. -/
def sublists_len_aux {α β : Type*} : ℕ → list α → (list α → β) → list β → list β
| 0 l f r := f [] :: r
| (n+1) [] f r := r
| (n+1) (a::l) f r := sublists_len_aux (n + 1) l f
(sublists_len_aux n l (f ∘ list.cons a) r)
/-- The list of all sublists of a list `l` that are of length `n`. For instance, for
`l = [0, 1, 2, 3]` and `n = 2`, one gets
`[[2, 3], [1, 3], [1, 2], [0, 3], [0, 2], [0, 1]]`. -/
def sublists_len {α : Type*} (n : ℕ) (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
sublists_len_aux n l id []
lemma sublists_len_aux_append {α β γ : Type*} :
∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (g : β → γ) (r : list β) (s : list γ),
sublists_len_aux n l (g ∘ f) (r.map g ++ s) =
(sublists_len_aux n l f r).map g ++ s
| 0 l f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) [] f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) f g r s := begin
unfold sublists_len_aux,
rw [show ((g ∘ f) ∘ list.cons a) = (g ∘ f ∘ list.cons a), by refl,
sublists_len_aux_append, sublists_len_aux_append]
end
lemma sublists_len_aux_eq {α β : Type*} (l : list α) (n) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux n l f r = (sublists_len n l).map f ++ r :=
by rw [sublists_len, ← sublists_len_aux_append]; refl
lemma sublists_len_aux_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux 0 l f r = f [] :: r := by cases l; refl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) :
sublists_len 0 l = [[]] := sublists_len_aux_zero _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_nil {α : Type*} (n) :
sublists_len (n+1) (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_cons {α : Type*} (n) (a : α) (l) :
sublists_len (n + 1) (a::l) =
sublists_len (n + 1) l ++ (sublists_len n l).map (cons a) :=
by rw [sublists_len, sublists_len_aux, sublists_len_aux_eq,
sublists_len_aux_eq, map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] lemma length_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
length (sublists_len n l) = nat.choose (length l) n
| 0 l := by simp
| (n+1) [] := by simp
| (n+1) (a::l) := by simp [-add_comm, nat.choose, *]; apply add_comm
lemma sublists_len_sublist_sublists' {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
sublists_len n l <+ sublists' l
| 0 l := singleton_sublist.2 (mem_sublists'.2 (nil_sublist _))
| (n+1) [] := nil_sublist _
| (n+1) (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, sublists'_cons],
exact (sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).append
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).map _)
end
lemma sublists_len_sublist_of_sublist
{α : Type*} (n) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : sublists_len n l₁ <+ sublists_len n l₂ :=
begin
induction n with n IHn generalizing l₁ l₂, {simp},
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH, {refl},
{ refine IH.trans _,
rw sublists_len_succ_cons,
apply sublist_append_left },
{ simp [sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact IH.append ((IHn s).map _) }
end
lemma length_of_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ {n} {l l' : list α},
l' ∈ sublists_len n l → length l' = n
| 0 l l' (or.inl rfl) := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) l' h := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, mem_append, mem_map] at h,
rcases h with h | ⟨l', h, rfl⟩,
{ exact length_of_sublists_len h },
{ exact congr_arg (+1) (length_of_sublists_len h) },
end
lemma mem_sublists_len_self {α : Type*} {l l' : list α}
(h : l' <+ l) : l' ∈ sublists_len (length l') l :=
begin
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ cases l₁ with b l₁,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_left _ IH } },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_right _ (mem_map.2 ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩) }
end
@[simp] lemma mem_sublists_len {α : Type*} {n} {l l' : list α} :
l' ∈ sublists_len n l ↔ l' <+ l ∧ length l' = n :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_sublists'.1
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).subset h),
length_of_sublists_len h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ ▸ mem_sublists_len_self h₁⟩
/-! ### permutations -/
section permutations
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_nil (is : list α) : permutations_aux [] is = [] :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_cons (t : α) (ts is : list α) :
permutations_aux (t :: ts) is = foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2)
(permutations_aux ts (t::is)) (permutations is) :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]; refl
end permutations
/-! ### insert -/
section insert
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem insert_nil (a : α) : insert a nil = [a] := rfl
theorem insert.def (a : α) (l : list α) : insert a l = if a ∈ l then l else a :: l := rfl
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : insert a l = l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_pos h]
@[simp, priority 970]
theorem insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : insert a l = a :: l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_neg h]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ insert b l ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
by_cases h' : b ∈ l,
{ simp only [insert_of_mem h'],
apply (or_iff_right_of_imp _).symm,
exact λ e, e.symm ▸ h' },
simp only [insert_of_not_mem h', mem_cons_iff]
end
@[simp] theorem suffix_insert (a : α) (l : list α) : l <:+ insert a l :=
by by_cases a ∈ l; [simp only [insert_of_mem h], simp only [insert_of_not_mem h, suffix_cons]]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ insert a l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inl rfl)
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : a ∈ insert b l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inr h)
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ insert b l) : a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
mem_insert_iff.1 h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l :=
by rw insert_of_mem h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l + 1 :=
by rw insert_of_not_mem h; refl
end insert
/-! ### erasep -/
section erasep
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
@[simp] theorem erasep_nil : [].erasep p = [] := rfl
theorem erasep_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
(a :: l).erasep p = if p a then l else a :: l.erasep p := rfl
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : list α} (h : p a) : (a :: l).erasep p = l :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ¬ p a) :
(a::l).erasep p = a :: l.erasep p :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
theorem erasep_of_forall_not {l : list α}
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ¬ p a) : l.erasep p = l :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl,
simp [h _ (or.inl rfl), ih (forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h)]]
theorem exists_of_erasep {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {cases al},
by_cases pb : p b,
{ exact ⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩ },
{ rcases al with rfl | al, {exact pb.elim pa},
rcases IH al with ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
exact ⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw h₃; refl, by simp [pb, h₄]⟩ }
end
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
l.erasep p = l ∨ ∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
by_cases h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a,
{ rcases h with ⟨a, ha, pa⟩,
exact or.inr (exists_of_erasep ha pa) },
{ simp at h, exact or.inl (erasep_of_forall_not h) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_erasep_of_mem {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.erasep p) = pred (length l) :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep al pa with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩;
rw e₂; simp [-add_comm, e₁]; refl
theorem erasep_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁.erasep p ++ l₂
| (x::xs) l₂ h := begin
by_cases h' : p x; simp [h'],
rw erasep_append_left l₂ (mem_of_ne_of_mem (mt _ h') h),
rintro rfl, exact pa
end
theorem erasep_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂.erasep p
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| (x::xs) l₂ h := by simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1,
erasep_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem erasep_sublist (l : list α) : l.erasep p <+ l :=
by rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩;
[rw h, {rw [h₄, h₃], simp}]
theorem erasep_subset (l : list α) : l.erasep p ⊆ l :=
(erasep_sublist l).subset
theorem sublist.erasep {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erasep p <+ l₂.erasep p :=
begin
induction s,
case list.sublist.slnil { refl },
case list.sublist.cons : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [IH.trans (erasep_sublist _), IH.cons _ _ _] },
case list.sublist.cons2 : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [s, IH.cons2 _ _ _] }
end
theorem mem_of_mem_erasep {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erasep p → a ∈ l :=
@erasep_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erasep_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (pa : ¬ p a) : a ∈ l.erasep p ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨mem_of_mem_erasep, λ al, begin
rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
{ rwa h },
{ rw h₄, rw h₃ at al,
have : a ≠ c, {rintro rfl, exact pa.elim h₂},
simpa [this] using al }
end⟩
theorem erasep_map (f : β → α) :
∀ (l : list β), (map f l).erasep p = map f (l.erasep (p ∘ f))
| [] := rfl
| (b::l) := by by_cases p (f b); simp [h, erasep_map l]
@[simp] theorem extractp_eq_find_erasep :
∀ l : list α, extractp p l = (find p l, erasep p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [extractp, pa, extractp_eq_find_erasep l]
end erasep
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem erase_nil (a : α) : [].erase a = [] := rfl
theorem erase_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
(b :: l).erase a = if b = a then l else b :: l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erase a = l :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : b ≠ a) :
(b::l).erase a = b :: l.erase a :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_neg h]; split; refl
theorem erase_eq_erasep (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a = l.erasep (eq a) :=
by { induction l with b l, {refl},
by_cases a = b; [simp [h], simp [h, ne.symm h, *]] }
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : l.erase a = l :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erasep_of_forall_not]; rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem exists_erase_eq {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep h rfl with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, rfl, h₂, h₃⟩;
rw erase_eq_erasep; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, λ h, h₁ _ h rfl, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (l.erase a) = pred (length l) :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact length_erasep_of_mem h rfl
theorem erase_append_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact erasep_append_left (by refl) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁ ++ l₂.erase a :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_append_right];
rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; apply erasep_sublist
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a ⊆ l :=
(erase_sublist a l).subset
theorem sublist.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact sublist.erasep h
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erase b → a ∈ l :=
@erase_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {l : list α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact mem_erasep_of_neg ab.symm
theorem erase_comm (a b : α) (l : list α) : (l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a :=
if ab : a = b then by rw ab else
if ha : a ∈ l then
if hb : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha, hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩, hb :=
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
by rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
by rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
theorem map_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {a : α}
(l : list α) : map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_map]; congr;
ext b; simp [finj.eq_iff]
theorem map_foldl_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (foldl list.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (λ l a, l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ :=
by induction l₂ generalizing l₁; [refl,
simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
@[simp] theorem count_erase_self (a : α) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s a) = pred (count a s)
| [] := by simp
| (h :: t) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
by_cases p : h = a,
{ rw [if_pos p, count_cons', if_pos p.symm], simp },
{ rw [if_neg p, count_cons', count_cons', if_neg (λ x : a = h, p x.symm), count_erase_self],
simp, }
end
@[simp] theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s b) = count a s
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [count_cons', h, if_neg ab], simp },
{ rw [count_cons', count_cons', count_erase_of_ne] }
end
end erase
/-! ### diff -/
section diff
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : list α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
if h : a ∈ l₁ then by simp only [list.diff, if_pos h]
else by simp only [list.diff, if_neg h, erase_of_not_mem h]
@[simp] theorem nil_diff (l : list α) : [].diff l = [] :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, diff_cons, erase_of_not_mem (not_mem_nil _)]]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁.diff l₂ = foldl list.erase l₁ l₂
| l₁ [] := rfl
| l₁ (a::l₂) := (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_append]
@[simp] theorem map_diff [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
theorem diff_sublist : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, l₁.diff l₂ <+ l₁
| l₁ [] := sublist.refl _
| l₁ (a::l₂) := calc l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ : diff_cons _ _ _
... <+ l₁.erase a : diff_sublist _ _
... <+ l₁ : list.erase_sublist _ _
theorem diff_subset (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁.diff l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
(diff_sublist _ _).subset
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ → a ∈ l₁.diff l₂
| l₁ [] h₁ h₂ := h₁
| l₁ (b::l₂) h₁ h₂ := by rw diff_cons; exact
mem_diff_of_mem ((mem_erase_of_ne (ne_of_not_mem_cons h₂)).2 h₁) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h₂)
theorem sublist.diff_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃: list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.diff l₃ <+ l₂.diff l₃
| l₁ l₂ [] h := h
| l₁ l₂ (a::l₃) h := by simp only
[diff_cons, (h.erase _).diff_right]
theorem erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α},
l₁ <+ l₂ → (l₂.erase a).diff (l₁.erase a) <+ l₂.diff l₁
| [] l₂ h := erase_sublist _ _
| (b::l₁) l₂ h := if heq : b = a then by simp only [heq, erase_cons_head, diff_cons]
else by simpa only [erase_cons_head, erase_cons_tail _ heq, diff_cons,
erase_comm a b l₂]
using erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist (h.erase b)
end diff
/-! ### enum -/
theorem length_enum_from : ∀ n (l : list α), length (enum_from n l) = length l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a::l) := congr_arg nat.succ (length_enum_from _ _)
theorem length_enum : ∀ (l : list α), length (enum l) = length l := length_enum_from _
@[simp] theorem enum_from_nth : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (enum_from n l) m = (λ a, (n + m, a)) <$> nth l m
| n [] m := rfl
| n (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| n (a :: l) (m+1) := (enum_from_nth (n+1) l m).trans $
by rw [add_right_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_nth : ∀ (l : list α) n,
nth (enum l) n = (λ a, (n, a)) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [enum, enum_from_nth, zero_add]; intros; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_snd : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum_from n l) = l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_snd _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_snd : ∀ (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum l) = l := enum_from_map_snd _
theorem mem_enum_from {x : α} {i : ℕ} :
∀ {j : ℕ} (xs : list α), (i, x) ∈ xs.enum_from j → j ≤ i ∧ i < j + xs.length ∧ x ∈ xs
| j [] := by simp [enum_from]
| j (y :: ys) :=
suffices i = j ∧ x = y ∨ (i, x) ∈ enum_from (j + 1) ys →
j ≤ i ∧ i < j + (length ys + 1) ∧ (x = y ∨ x ∈ ys),
by simpa [enum_from, mem_enum_from ys],
begin
rintro (h|h),
{ refine ⟨le_of_eq h.1.symm,h.1 ▸ _,or.inl h.2⟩,
apply nat.lt_add_of_pos_right; simp },
{ obtain ⟨hji, hijlen, hmem⟩ := mem_enum_from _ h,
refine ⟨_, _, _⟩,
{ exact le_trans (nat.le_succ _) hji },
{ convert hijlen using 1, ac_refl },
{ simp [hmem] } }
end
/-! ### product -/
@[simp] theorem nil_product (l : list β) : product (@nil α) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β)
: product (a::l₁) l₂ = map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_nil : ∀ (l : list α), product l (@nil β) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [product_cons, product_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ :=
by simp only [product, mem_bind, mem_map, prod.ext_iff, exists_prop,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [exact (zero_mul _).symm,
simp only [length, product_cons, length_append, IH,
right_distrib, one_mul, length_map, add_comm]]
/-! ### sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
@[simp] theorem nil_sigma (l : Π a, list (σ a)) : (@nil α).sigma l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a))
: (a::l₁).sigma l₂ = map (sigma.mk a) (l₂ a) ++ l₁.sigma l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_nil : ∀ (l : list α), l.sigma (λ a, @nil (σ a)) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [sigma_cons, sigma_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)} {a : α} {b : σ a} :
sigma.mk a b ∈ l₁.sigma l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ a :=
by simp only [list.sigma, mem_bind, mem_map, exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_left,
and.left_comm, exists_eq_left, heq_iff_eq, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
length (l₁.sigma l₂) = (l₁.map (λ a, length (l₂ a))).sum :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [refl,
simp only [map, sigma_cons, length_append, length_map, IH, sum_cons]]
end
/-! ### disjoint -/
section disjoint
theorem disjoint.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : disjoint l₂ l₁
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ disjoint l₂ l₁ :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l l₂) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m₁ := d (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l₁ l) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m m₁ := d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (list.subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (list.subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : list α) : disjoint [] l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : list α) : disjoint l [] :=
by rw disjoint_comm; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_singleton, forall_eq]; refl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint (l₁++l₂) l ↔ disjoint l₁ l ∧ disjoint l₂ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint l (l₁++l₂) ↔ disjoint l l₁ ∧ disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_append_left]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ a ∉ l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(@disjoint_append_left _ [a] l₁ l₂).trans $ by simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) ↔ a ∉ l₁ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_cons_left]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
end disjoint
/-! ### union -/
section union
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : list α) : [] ∪ l = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_union (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : a :: l₁ ∪ l₂ = insert a (l₁ ∪ l₂) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂ :=
by induction l₁; simp only [nil_union, not_mem_nil, false_or, cons_union, mem_insert_iff,
mem_cons_iff, or_assoc, *]
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : list α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [] l₂ := ⟨[], by refl, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) l₂ := let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
if h : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂
then ⟨t, sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, by simp only [e, cons_union, insert_of_mem h]⟩
else ⟨a::t, cons_sublist_cons _ s, by simp only [cons_append, cons_union, e, insert_of_not_mem h];
split; refl⟩
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp (λ a, and.right)
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
end union
/-! ### inter -/
section inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem inter_nil (l : list α) : [] ∩ l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
if_neg h
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₂ :=
of_mem_filter
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂ :=
mem_filter
theorem inter_subset_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset _
theorem inter_subset_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
λ a h, mem_inter.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_inter, not_and]; refl
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x)
(l₂ : list α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right {p : α → Prop} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
end inter
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α)
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_x p l hp).property
lemma choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l := (choose_spec _ _ _).1
lemma choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) := (choose_spec _ _ _).2
end choose
-- A jumble of lost lemmas:
theorem ilast'_mem : ∀ a l, @ilast' α a l ∈ a :: l
| a [] := or.inl rfl
| a (b::l) := or.inr (ilast'_mem b l)
@[simp] lemma nth_le_attach (L : list α) (i) (H : i < L.attach.length) :
(L.attach.nth_le i H).1 = L.nth_le i (length_attach L ▸ H) :=
calc (L.attach.nth_le i H).1
= (L.attach.map subtype.val).nth_le i (by simpa using H) : by rw nth_le_map'
... = L.nth_le i _ : by congr; apply attach_map_val
end list
@[to_additive]
theorem monoid_hom.map_list_prod {α β : Type*} [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α →* β) (l : list α) :
f l.prod = (l.map f).prod :=
(l.prod_hom f).symm
namespace list
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_map_hom {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (L : list α) (f : α → β) (g : β →* γ) :
(L.map (g ∘ f)).prod = g ((L.map f).prod) :=
by {rw g.map_list_prod, exact congr_arg _ (map_map _ _ _).symm}
theorem sum_map_mul_left {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, r * f b)).sum = r * (L.map f).sum :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_left r
theorem sum_map_mul_right {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, f b * r)).sum = (L.map f).sum * r :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_right r
end list
|
ec870a479f8c997c4f7bc7eabf2294a6c5798f12 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/tactic/explode_widget_auto.lean | 2fb28f5ece2dd00e5ddb5dae1a3a32d23809ec0d | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 651 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Minchao Wu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Minchao Wu
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.tactic.explode
import Mathlib.tactic.interactive_expr
import Mathlib.PostPort
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# `#explode_widget` command
Render a widget that displays an `#explode` proof, providing more
interactivity such as jumping to definitions and exploding constants
occurring in the exploded proofs.
-/
namespace tactic
namespace explode_widget
/-- Redefine some of the style attributes for better formatting. -/
end Mathlib |
111cb27056c875556a3c11e037f063b02ede8103 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/analysis/convex/simplicial_complex/basic.lean | 20a7e59aa8b218ab6b97af1f6d88537efb88c162 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,765 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import analysis.convex.topology
import tactic.by_contra
/-!
# Simplicial complexes
In this file, we define simplicial complexes in `𝕜`-modules. A simplicial complex is a collection
of simplices closed by inclusion (of vertices) and intersection (of underlying sets).
We model them by a downward-closed set of affine independent finite sets whose convex hulls "glue
nicely", each finite set and its convex hull corresponding respectively to the vertices and the
underlying set of a simplex.
## Main declarations
* `simplicial_complex 𝕜 E`: A simplicial complex in the `𝕜`-module `E`.
* `simplicial_complex.vertices`: The zero dimensional faces of a simplicial complex.
* `simplicial_complex.facets`: The maximal faces of a simplicial complex.
## Notation
`s ∈ K` means that `s` is a face of `K`.
`K ≤ L` means that the faces of `K` are faces of `L`.
## Implementation notes
"glue nicely" usually means that the intersection of two faces (as sets in the ambient space) is a
face. Given that we store the vertices, not the faces, this would be a bit awkward to spell.
Instead, `simplicial_complex.inter_subset_convex_hull` is an equivalent condition which works on the
vertices.
## TODO
Simplicial complexes can be generalized to affine spaces once `convex_hull` has been ported.
-/
open finset set
variables (𝕜 E : Type*) {ι : Type*} [ordered_ring 𝕜] [add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E]
namespace geometry
/-- A simplicial complex in a `𝕜`-module is a collection of simplices which glue nicely together.
Note that the textbook meaning of "glue nicely" is given in
`geometry.simplicial_complex.disjoint_or_exists_inter_eq_convex_hull`. It is mostly useless, as
`geometry.simplicial_complex.convex_hull_inter_convex_hull` is enough for all purposes. -/
-- TODO: update to new binder order? not sure what binder order is correct for `down_closed`.
@[ext] structure simplicial_complex :=
(faces : set (finset E))
(not_empty_mem : ∅ ∉ faces)
(indep : ∀ {s}, s ∈ faces → affine_independent 𝕜 (coe : (s : set E) → E))
(down_closed : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ⊆ s → t ≠ ∅ → t ∈ faces)
(inter_subset_convex_hull : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ∈ faces →
convex_hull 𝕜 ↑s ∩ convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t ⊆ convex_hull 𝕜 (s ∩ t : set E))
namespace simplicial_complex
variables {𝕜 E} {K : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E} {s t : finset E} {x : E}
/-- A `finset` belongs to a `simplicial_complex` if it's a face of it. -/
instance : has_mem (finset E) (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) := ⟨λ s K, s ∈ K.faces⟩
/-- The underlying space of a simplicial complex is the union of its faces. -/
def space (K : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) : set E := ⋃ s ∈ K.faces, convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E)
lemma mem_space_iff : x ∈ K.space ↔ ∃ s ∈ K.faces, x ∈ convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E) := mem_Union₂
lemma convex_hull_subset_space (hs : s ∈ K.faces) : convex_hull 𝕜 ↑s ⊆ K.space :=
subset_bUnion_of_mem hs
protected lemma subset_space (hs : s ∈ K.faces) : (s : set E) ⊆ K.space :=
(subset_convex_hull 𝕜 _).trans $ convex_hull_subset_space hs
lemma convex_hull_inter_convex_hull (hs : s ∈ K.faces) (ht : t ∈ K.faces) :
convex_hull 𝕜 ↑s ∩ convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t = convex_hull 𝕜 (s ∩ t : set E) :=
(K.inter_subset_convex_hull hs ht).antisymm $ subset_inter
(convex_hull_mono $ set.inter_subset_left _ _) $ convex_hull_mono $ set.inter_subset_right _ _
/-- The conclusion is the usual meaning of "glue nicely" in textbooks. It turns out to be quite
unusable, as it's about faces as sets in space rather than simplices. Further, additional structure
on `𝕜` means the only choice of `u` is `s ∩ t` (but it's hard to prove). -/
lemma disjoint_or_exists_inter_eq_convex_hull (hs : s ∈ K.faces) (ht : t ∈ K.faces) :
disjoint (convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E)) (convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t) ∨
∃ u ∈ K.faces, convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E) ∩ convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t = convex_hull 𝕜 ↑u :=
begin
classical,
by_contra' h,
refine h.2 (s ∩ t) (K.down_closed hs (inter_subset_left _ _) $ λ hst, h.1 $
(K.inter_subset_convex_hull hs ht).trans _) _,
{ rw [←coe_inter, hst, coe_empty, convex_hull_empty],
refl },
{ rw [coe_inter, convex_hull_inter_convex_hull hs ht] }
end
/-- Construct a simplicial complex by removing the empty face for you. -/
@[simps] def of_erase
(faces : set (finset E))
(indep : ∀ s ∈ faces, affine_independent 𝕜 (coe : (s : set E) → E))
(down_closed : ∀ s ∈ faces, ∀ t ⊆ s, t ∈ faces)
(inter_subset_convex_hull : ∀ s t ∈ faces,
convex_hull 𝕜 ↑s ∩ convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t ⊆ convex_hull 𝕜 (s ∩ t : set E)) :
simplicial_complex 𝕜 E :=
{ faces := faces \ {∅},
not_empty_mem := λ h, h.2 (mem_singleton _),
indep := λ s hs, indep _ hs.1,
down_closed := λ s t hs hts ht, ⟨down_closed _ hs.1 _ hts, ht⟩,
inter_subset_convex_hull := λ s t hs ht, inter_subset_convex_hull _ hs.1 _ ht.1 }
/-- Construct a simplicial complex as a subset of a given simplicial complex. -/
@[simps] def of_subcomplex (K : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E)
(faces : set (finset E))
(subset : faces ⊆ K.faces)
(down_closed : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ⊆ s → t ∈ faces) :
simplicial_complex 𝕜 E :=
{ faces := faces,
not_empty_mem := λ h, K.not_empty_mem (subset h),
indep := λ s hs, K.indep (subset hs),
down_closed := λ s t hs hts _, down_closed hs hts,
inter_subset_convex_hull := λ s t hs ht, K.inter_subset_convex_hull (subset hs) (subset ht) }
/-! ### Vertices -/
/-- The vertices of a simplicial complex are its zero dimensional faces. -/
def vertices (K : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) : set E := {x | {x} ∈ K.faces}
lemma mem_vertices : x ∈ K.vertices ↔ {x} ∈ K.faces := iff.rfl
lemma vertices_eq : K.vertices = ⋃ k ∈ K.faces, (k : set E) :=
begin
ext x,
refine ⟨λ h, mem_bUnion h $ mem_coe.2 $ mem_singleton_self x, λ h, _⟩,
obtain ⟨s, hs, hx⟩ := mem_Union₂.1 h,
exact K.down_closed hs (finset.singleton_subset_iff.2 $ mem_coe.1 hx) (singleton_ne_empty _),
end
lemma vertices_subset_space : K.vertices ⊆ K.space :=
vertices_eq.subset.trans $ Union₂_mono $ λ x hx, subset_convex_hull 𝕜 x
lemma vertex_mem_convex_hull_iff (hx : x ∈ K.vertices) (hs : s ∈ K.faces) :
x ∈ convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E) ↔ x ∈ s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, subset_convex_hull _ _ h⟩,
classical,
have h := K.inter_subset_convex_hull hx hs ⟨by simp, h⟩,
by_contra H,
rwa [←coe_inter, finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1
(finset.disjoint_singleton_right.2 H).symm, coe_empty, convex_hull_empty] at h,
end
/-- A face is a subset of another one iff its vertices are. -/
lemma face_subset_face_iff (hs : s ∈ K.faces) (ht : t ∈ K.faces) :
convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E) ⊆ convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨λ h x hxs, (vertex_mem_convex_hull_iff (K.down_closed hs (finset.singleton_subset_iff.2 hxs) $
singleton_ne_empty _) ht).1 (h (subset_convex_hull 𝕜 ↑s hxs)), convex_hull_mono⟩
/-! ### Facets -/
/-- A facet of a simplicial complex is a maximal face. -/
def facets (K : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) : set (finset E) :=
{s ∈ K.faces | ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ K.faces → s ⊆ t → s = t}
lemma mem_facets : s ∈ K.facets ↔ s ∈ K.faces ∧ ∀ t ∈ K.faces, s ⊆ t → s = t := mem_sep_iff
lemma facets_subset : K.facets ⊆ K.faces := λ s hs, hs.1
lemma not_facet_iff_subface (hs : s ∈ K.faces) : (s ∉ K.facets ↔ ∃ t, t ∈ K.faces ∧ s ⊂ t) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ (hs' : ¬ (_ ∧ _)), _, _⟩,
{ push_neg at hs',
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs' hs,
exact ⟨t, ht.1, ⟨ht.2.1, (λ hts, ht.2.2 (subset.antisymm ht.2.1 hts))⟩⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨t, ht⟩ ⟨hs, hs'⟩,
have := hs' ht.1 ht.2.1,
rw this at ht,
exact ht.2.2 (subset.refl t) } -- `has_ssubset.ssubset.ne` would be handy here
end
/-!
### The semilattice of simplicial complexes
`K ≤ L` means that `K.faces ⊆ L.faces`.
-/
variables (𝕜 E)
/-- The complex consisting of only the faces present in both of its arguments. -/
instance : has_inf (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) :=
⟨λ K L, { faces := K.faces ∩ L.faces,
not_empty_mem := λ h, K.not_empty_mem (set.inter_subset_left _ _ h),
indep := λ s hs, K.indep hs.1,
down_closed := λ s t hs hst ht, ⟨K.down_closed hs.1 hst ht, L.down_closed hs.2 hst ht⟩,
inter_subset_convex_hull := λ s t hs ht, K.inter_subset_convex_hull hs.1 ht.1 }⟩
instance : semilattice_inf (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) :=
{ inf := (⊓),
inf_le_left := λ K L s hs, hs.1,
inf_le_right := λ K L s hs, hs.2,
le_inf := λ K L M hKL hKM s hs, ⟨hKL hs, hKM hs⟩,
.. (partial_order.lift faces $ λ x y, ext _ _) }
instance : has_bot (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ faces := ∅,
not_empty_mem := set.not_mem_empty ∅,
indep := λ s hs, (set.not_mem_empty _ hs).elim,
down_closed := λ s _ hs, (set.not_mem_empty _ hs).elim,
inter_subset_convex_hull := λ s _ hs, (set.not_mem_empty _ hs).elim }⟩
instance : order_bot (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) :=
{ bot_le := λ K, set.empty_subset _, .. simplicial_complex.has_bot 𝕜 E }
instance : inhabited (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) := ⟨⊥⟩
variables {𝕜 E}
lemma faces_bot : (⊥ : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E).faces = ∅ := rfl
lemma space_bot : (⊥ : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E).space = ∅ := set.bUnion_empty _
lemma facets_bot : (⊥ : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E).facets = ∅ := eq_empty_of_subset_empty facets_subset
end simplicial_complex
end geometry
|
f4fc7b2e66cb87130f6158d02964a61ba34f124a | 6b45072eb2b3db3ecaace2a7a0241ce81f815787 | /data/nat/sub.lean | 42c66d7974dc06a3be56513befa58e80b3bd2112 | [] | no_license | avigad/library_dev | 27b47257382667b5eb7e6476c4f5b0d685dd3ddc | 9d8ac7c7798ca550874e90fed585caad030bbfac | refs/heads/master | 1,610,452,468,791 | 1,500,712,839,000 | 1,500,713,478,000 | 69,311,142 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,474,942,903,000 | 1,474,942,902,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,270 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Jeremy Avigad
Subtraction on the natural numbers, as well as min, max, and distance.
-/
namespace nat
/- interaction with inequalities -/
protected theorem le_sub_add (n m : ℕ) : n ≤ n - m + m :=
or.elim (le_total n m)
(assume : n ≤ m, begin rw [sub_eq_zero_of_le this, zero_add], exact this end)
(assume : m ≤ n, begin rw (nat.sub_add_cancel this) end)
protected theorem sub_eq_of_eq_add {n m k : ℕ} (h : k = n + m) : k - n = m :=
begin rw [h, nat.add_sub_cancel_left] end
protected theorem lt_of_sub_pos {m n : ℕ} (h : n - m > 0) : m < n :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume : m ≥ n,
have n - m = 0, from sub_eq_zero_of_le this,
begin rw this at h, exact lt_irrefl _ h end)
protected theorem lt_of_sub_lt_sub_right {n m k : ℕ} (h : n - k < m - k) : n < m :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume : m ≤ n,
have m - k ≤ n - k, from nat.sub_le_sub_right this _,
not_le_of_gt h this)
protected theorem lt_of_sub_lt_sub_left {n m k : ℕ} (h : n - m < n - k) : k < m :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume : m ≤ k,
have n - k ≤ n - m, from nat.sub_le_sub_left _ this,
not_le_of_gt h this)
protected theorem sub_lt_self {m n : ℕ} (h₁ : m > 0) (h₂ : n > 0) : m - n < m :=
calc
m - n = succ (pred m) - succ (pred n) : by rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₁, succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₂]
... = pred m - pred n : by rw succ_sub_succ
... ≤ pred m : sub_le _ _
... < succ (pred m) : lt_succ_self _
... = m : succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₁
protected theorem le_sub_of_add_le {m n k : ℕ} (h : m + k ≤ n) : m ≤ n - k :=
calc
m = m + k - k : by rw nat.add_sub_cancel
... ≤ n - k : nat.sub_le_sub_right h k
protected theorem lt_sub_of_add_lt {m n k : ℕ} (h : m + k < n) : m < n - k :=
lt_of_succ_le (nat.le_sub_of_add_le (calc
succ m + k = succ (m + k) : by rw succ_add
... ≤ n : succ_le_of_lt h))
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub {m n k : ℕ} (h : m < n - k) : m + k < n :=
@nat.lt_of_sub_lt_sub_right _ _ k (by rwa nat.add_sub_cancel)
protected theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {k n m : nat} (h₁ : k < n + m) (h₂ : n ≤ k) : k - n < m :=
have succ k ≤ n + m, from succ_le_of_lt h₁,
have succ (k - n) ≤ m, from
calc succ (k - n) = succ k - n : by rw (succ_sub h₂)
... ≤ n + m - n : nat.sub_le_sub_right this n
... = m : by rw nat.add_sub_cancel_left,
lt_of_succ_le this
/- distance -/
definition dist (n m : ℕ) := (n - m) + (m - n)
theorem dist.def (n m : ℕ) : dist n m = (n - m) + (m - n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem dist_comm (n m : ℕ) : dist n m = dist m n :=
by simp [dist.def]
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (n : ℕ) : dist n n = 0 :=
by simp [dist.def, nat.sub_self]
theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero {n m : ℕ} (h : dist n m = 0) : n = m :=
have n - m = 0, from eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h,
have n ≤ m, from nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero this,
have m - n = 0, from eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h,
have m ≤ n, from nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero this,
le_antisymm ‹n ≤ m› ‹m ≤ n›
theorem dist_eq_zero {n m : ℕ} (h : n = m) : dist n m = 0 :=
begin rw [h, dist_self] end
theorem dist_eq_sub_of_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : dist n m = m - n :=
begin rw [dist.def, sub_eq_zero_of_le h, zero_add] end
theorem dist_eq_sub_of_ge {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≥ m) : dist n m = n - m :=
begin rw [dist_comm], apply dist_eq_sub_of_le h end
theorem dist_zero_right (n : ℕ) : dist n 0 = n :=
eq.trans (dist_eq_sub_of_ge (zero_le n)) (nat.sub_zero n)
theorem dist_zero_left (n : ℕ) : dist 0 n = n :=
eq.trans (dist_eq_sub_of_le (zero_le n)) (nat.sub_zero n)
theorem dist_add_add_right (n k m : ℕ) : dist (n + k) (m + k) = dist n m :=
calc
dist (n + k) (m + k) = ((n + k) - (m + k)) + ((m + k)-(n + k)) : rfl
... = (n - m) + ((m + k) - (n + k)) : by rw nat.add_sub_add_right
... = (n - m) + (m - n) : by rw nat.add_sub_add_right
theorem dist_add_add_left (k n m : ℕ) : dist (k + n) (k + m) = dist n m :=
begin rw [add_comm k n, add_comm k m], apply dist_add_add_right end
theorem dist_eq_intro {n m k l : ℕ} (h : n + m = k + l) : dist n k = dist l m :=
calc
dist n k = dist (n + m) (k + m) : by rw dist_add_add_right
... = dist (k + l) (k + m) : by rw h
... = dist l m : by rw dist_add_add_left
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_add_sub (n m k : ℕ) : n - k ≤ (n - m) + (m - k) :=
or.elim (le_total k m)
(assume : k ≤ m,
begin rw ←nat.add_sub_assoc this, apply nat.sub_le_sub_right, apply nat.le_sub_add end)
(assume : k ≥ m,
begin rw [sub_eq_zero_of_le this, add_zero], apply nat.sub_le_sub_left, exact this end)
theorem dist.triangle_inequality (n m k : ℕ) : dist n k ≤ dist n m + dist m k :=
have dist n m + dist m k = (n - m) + (m - k) + ((k - m) + (m - n)), by simp [dist.def],
begin
rw [this, dist.def], apply add_le_add, repeat { apply nat.sub_lt_sub_add_sub }
end
theorem dist_mul_right (n k m : ℕ) : dist (n * k) (m * k) = dist n m * k :=
by rw [dist.def, dist.def, right_distrib, nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, nat.mul_sub_right_distrib]
theorem dist_mul_left (k n m : ℕ) : dist (k * n) (k * m) = k * dist n m :=
by rw [mul_comm k n, mul_comm k m, dist_mul_right, mul_comm]
-- TODO(Jeremy): do when we have max and minx
--lemma dist_eq_max_sub_min {i j : nat} : dist i j = (max i j) - min i j :=
--sorry
/-
or.elim (lt_or_ge i j)
(assume : i < j,
by rw [max_eq_right_of_lt this, min_eq_left_of_lt this, dist_eq_sub_of_lt this])
(assume : i ≥ j,
by rw [max_eq_left this , min_eq_right this, dist_eq_sub_of_ge this])
-/
lemma dist_succ_succ {i j : nat} : dist (succ i) (succ j) = dist i j :=
by simp [dist.def, succ_sub_succ]
lemma dist_pos_of_ne {i j : nat} : i ≠ j → dist i j > 0 :=
assume hne, nat.lt_by_cases
(assume : i < j,
begin rw [dist_eq_sub_of_le (le_of_lt this)], apply nat.sub_pos_of_lt this end)
(assume : i = j, by contradiction)
(assume : i > j,
begin rw [dist_eq_sub_of_ge (le_of_lt this)], apply nat.sub_pos_of_lt this end)
end nat
|
576308f29dccebd7cd695f62b8e5bf51bc20b83e | fe25de614feb5587799621c41487aaee0d083b08 | /stage0/src/Lean/Syntax.lean | d57f633c22286bda3d353c01f424569fd28e685f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pollend/lean4 | e8469c2f5fb8779b773618c3267883cf21fb9fac | c913886938c4b3b83238a3f99673c6c5a9cec270 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,973,251,481 | 1,628,039,739,000 | 1,628,039,739,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,096 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Data.Name
import Lean.Data.Format
namespace Lean
def SourceInfo.updateTrailing (trailing : Substring) : SourceInfo → SourceInfo
| SourceInfo.original leading pos _ endPos => SourceInfo.original leading pos trailing endPos
| info => info
/- Syntax AST -/
inductive IsNode : Syntax → Prop where
| mk (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (args : Array Syntax) : IsNode (Syntax.node kind args)
def SyntaxNode : Type := {s : Syntax // IsNode s }
def unreachIsNodeMissing {β} (h : IsNode Syntax.missing) : β := False.elim (nomatch h)
def unreachIsNodeAtom {β} {info val} (h : IsNode (Syntax.atom info val)) : β := False.elim (nomatch h)
def unreachIsNodeIdent {β info rawVal val preresolved} (h : IsNode (Syntax.ident info rawVal val preresolved)) : β := False.elim (nomatch h)
namespace SyntaxNode
@[inline] def getKind (n : SyntaxNode) : SyntaxNodeKind :=
match n with
| ⟨Syntax.node k args, _⟩ => k
| ⟨Syntax.missing, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeMissing h
| ⟨Syntax.atom .., h⟩ => unreachIsNodeAtom h
| ⟨Syntax.ident .., h⟩ => unreachIsNodeIdent h
@[inline] def withArgs {β} (n : SyntaxNode) (fn : Array Syntax → β) : β :=
match n with
| ⟨Syntax.node _ args, _⟩ => fn args
| ⟨Syntax.missing, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeMissing h
| ⟨Syntax.atom _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeAtom h
| ⟨Syntax.ident _ _ _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeIdent h
@[inline] def getNumArgs (n : SyntaxNode) : Nat :=
withArgs n $ fun args => args.size
@[inline] def getArg (n : SyntaxNode) (i : Nat) : Syntax :=
withArgs n $ fun args => args.get! i
@[inline] def getArgs (n : SyntaxNode) : Array Syntax :=
withArgs n $ fun args => args
@[inline] def modifyArgs (n : SyntaxNode) (fn : Array Syntax → Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
match n with
| ⟨Syntax.node kind args, _⟩ => Syntax.node kind (fn args)
| ⟨Syntax.missing, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeMissing h
| ⟨Syntax.atom _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeAtom h
| ⟨Syntax.ident _ _ _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeIdent h
end SyntaxNode
namespace Syntax
def getAtomVal! : Syntax → String
| atom _ val => val
| _ => panic! "getAtomVal!: not an atom"
def setAtomVal : Syntax → String → Syntax
| atom info _, v => (atom info v)
| stx, _ => stx
@[inline] def ifNode {β} (stx : Syntax) (hyes : SyntaxNode → β) (hno : Unit → β) : β :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node k args => hyes ⟨Syntax.node k args, IsNode.mk k args⟩
| _ => hno ()
@[inline] def ifNodeKind {β} (stx : Syntax) (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (hyes : SyntaxNode → β) (hno : Unit → β) : β :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node k args => if k == kind then hyes ⟨Syntax.node k args, IsNode.mk k args⟩ else hno ()
| _ => hno ()
def asNode : Syntax → SyntaxNode
| Syntax.node kind args => ⟨Syntax.node kind args, IsNode.mk kind args⟩
| _ => ⟨Syntax.node nullKind #[], IsNode.mk nullKind #[]⟩
def getIdAt (stx : Syntax) (i : Nat) : Name :=
(stx.getArg i).getId
@[inline] def modifyArgs (stx : Syntax) (fn : Array Syntax → Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx with
| node k args => node k (fn args)
| stx => stx
@[inline] def modifyArg (stx : Syntax) (i : Nat) (fn : Syntax → Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx with
| node k args => node k (args.modify i fn)
| stx => stx
@[specialize] partial def replaceM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (fn : Syntax → m (Option Syntax)) : Syntax → m (Syntax)
| stx@(node kind args) => do
match (← fn stx) with
| some stx => return stx
| none => return node kind (← args.mapM (replaceM fn))
| stx => do
let o ← fn stx
return o.getD stx
@[specialize] partial def rewriteBottomUpM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (fn : Syntax → m (Syntax)) : Syntax → m (Syntax)
| node kind args => do
let args ← args.mapM (rewriteBottomUpM fn)
fn (node kind args)
| stx => fn stx
@[inline] def rewriteBottomUp (fn : Syntax → Syntax) (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
Id.run $ stx.rewriteBottomUpM fn
private def updateInfo : SourceInfo → String.Pos → String.Pos → SourceInfo
| SourceInfo.original lead pos trail endPos, leadStart, trailStop =>
SourceInfo.original { lead with startPos := leadStart } pos { trail with stopPos := trailStop } endPos
| info, _, _ => info
private def chooseNiceTrailStop (trail : Substring) : String.Pos :=
trail.startPos + trail.posOf '\n'
/- Remark: the State `String.Pos` is the `SourceInfo.trailing.stopPos` of the previous token,
or the beginning of the String. -/
@[inline]
private def updateLeadingAux : Syntax → StateM String.Pos (Option Syntax)
| atom info@(SourceInfo.original lead _ trail _) val => do
let trailStop := chooseNiceTrailStop trail
let newInfo := updateInfo info (← get) trailStop
set trailStop
pure $ some (atom newInfo val)
| ident info@(SourceInfo.original lead _ trail _) rawVal val pre => do
let trailStop := chooseNiceTrailStop trail
let newInfo := updateInfo info (← get) trailStop
set trailStop
pure $ some (ident newInfo rawVal val pre)
| _ => pure none
/-- Set `SourceInfo.leading` according to the trailing stop of the preceding token.
The result is a round-tripping syntax tree IF, in the input syntax tree,
* all leading stops, atom contents, and trailing starts are correct
* trailing stops are between the trailing start and the next leading stop.
Remark: after parsing, all `SourceInfo.leading` fields are empty.
The `Syntax` argument is the output produced by the parser for `source`.
This function "fixes" the `source.leading` field.
Additionally, we try to choose "nicer" splits between leading and trailing stops
according to some heuristics so that e.g. comments are associated to the (intuitively)
correct token.
Note that the `SourceInfo.trailing` fields must be correct.
The implementation of this Function relies on this property. -/
def updateLeading : Syntax → Syntax :=
fun stx => (replaceM updateLeadingAux stx).run' 0
partial def updateTrailing (trailing : Substring) : Syntax → Syntax
| Syntax.atom info val => Syntax.atom (info.updateTrailing trailing) val
| Syntax.ident info rawVal val pre => Syntax.ident (info.updateTrailing trailing) rawVal val pre
| n@(Syntax.node k args) =>
if args.size == 0 then n
else
let i := args.size - 1
let last := updateTrailing trailing args[i]
let args := args.set! i last;
Syntax.node k args
| s => s
partial def getTailWithPos : Syntax → Option Syntax
| stx@(atom info _) => info.getPos?.map fun _ => stx
| stx@(ident info ..) => info.getPos?.map fun _ => stx
| node _ args => args.findSomeRev? getTailWithPos
| _ => none
open SourceInfo in
/-- Split an `ident` into its dot-separated components while preserving source info.
Macro scopes are first erased. For example, `` `foo.bla.boo._@._hyg.4 `` ↦ `` [`foo, `bla, `boo] ``.
If `nFields` is set, we take that many fields from the end and keep the remaining components
as one name. For example, `` `foo.bla.boo `` with `(nFields := 1)` ↦ `` [`foo.bla, `boo] ``. -/
def identComponents (stx : Syntax) (nFields? : Option Nat := none) : List Syntax :=
match stx with
| ident (SourceInfo.original lead pos trail _) rawStr val _ =>
let val := val.eraseMacroScopes
-- With original info, we assume that `rawStr` represents `val`.
let nameComps := nameComps val nFields?
let rawComps := splitNameLit rawStr
let rawComps :=
if let some nFields := nFields? then
let nPrefix := rawComps.length - nFields
let prefixSz := rawComps.take nPrefix |>.foldl (init := 0) fun acc (ss : Substring) => acc + ss.bsize + 1
let prefixSz := prefixSz - 1 -- The last component has no dot
rawStr.extract 0 prefixSz :: rawComps.drop nPrefix
else
rawComps
assert! nameComps.length == rawComps.length
nameComps.zip rawComps |>.map fun (id, ss) =>
let off := ss.startPos - rawStr.startPos
let lead := if off == 0 then lead else "".toSubstring
let trail := if ss.stopPos == rawStr.stopPos then trail else "".toSubstring
let info := original lead (pos + off) trail (pos + off + ss.bsize)
ident info ss id []
| ident si _ val _ =>
let val := val.eraseMacroScopes
/- With non-original info:
- `rawStr` can take all kinds of forms so we only use `val`.
- there is no source extent to offset, so we pass it as-is. -/
nameComps val nFields? |>.map fun n => ident si n.toString.toSubstring n []
| _ => unreachable!
where
nameComps (n : Name) (nFields? : Option Nat) : List Name :=
if let some nFields := nFields? then
let nameComps := n.components
let nPrefix := nameComps.length - nFields
let namePrefix := nameComps.take nPrefix |>.foldl (init := Name.anonymous) fun acc n => acc ++ n
namePrefix :: nameComps.drop nPrefix
else
n.components
structure TopDown where
firstChoiceOnly : Bool
stx : Syntax
/--
`for _ in stx.topDown` iterates through each node and leaf in `stx` top-down, left-to-right.
If `firstChoiceOnly` is `true`, only visit the first argument of each choice node.
-/
def topDown (stx : Syntax) (firstChoiceOnly := false) : TopDown := ⟨firstChoiceOnly, stx⟩
partial instance : ForIn m TopDown Syntax where
forIn := fun ⟨firstChoiceOnly, stx⟩ init f => do
let rec @[specialize] loop stx b [Inhabited (typeOf% b)] := do
match (← f stx b) with
| ForInStep.yield b' =>
let mut b := b'
if let Syntax.node k args := stx then
if firstChoiceOnly && k == choiceKind then
return ← loop args[0] b
else
for arg in args do
match (← loop arg b) with
| ForInStep.yield b' => b := b'
| ForInStep.done b' => return ForInStep.done b'
return ForInStep.yield b
| ForInStep.done b => return ForInStep.done b
match (← @loop stx init ⟨init⟩) with
| ForInStep.yield b => return b
| ForInStep.done b => return b
partial def reprint (stx : Syntax) : Option String :=
OptionM.run do
let mut s := ""
for stx in stx.topDown (firstChoiceOnly := true) do
match stx with
| atom info val => s := s ++ reprintLeaf info val
| ident info rawVal _ _ => s := s ++ reprintLeaf info rawVal.toString
| node kind args =>
if kind == choiceKind then
-- this visit the first arg twice, but that should hardly be a problem
-- given that choice nodes are quite rare and small
let s0 ← reprint args[0]
for arg in args[1:] do
let s' ← reprint arg
guard (s0 == s')
| _ => pure ()
return s
where
reprintLeaf (info : SourceInfo) (val : String) : String :=
match info with
| SourceInfo.original lead _ trail _ => s!"{lead}{val}{trail}"
-- no source info => add gracious amounts of whitespace to definitely separate tokens
-- Note that the proper pretty printer does not use this function.
-- The parser as well always produces source info, so round-tripping is still
-- guaranteed.
| _ => s!" {val} "
def hasMissing (stx : Syntax) : Bool := do
for stx in stx.topDown do
if stx.isMissing then
return true
return false
/--
Represents a cursor into a syntax tree that can be read, written, and advanced down/up/left/right.
Indices are allowed to be out-of-bound, in which case `cur` is `Syntax.missing`.
If the `Traverser` is used linearly, updates are linear in the `Syntax` object as well.
-/
structure Traverser where
cur : Syntax
parents : Array Syntax
idxs : Array Nat
namespace Traverser
def fromSyntax (stx : Syntax) : Traverser :=
⟨stx, #[], #[]⟩
def setCur (t : Traverser) (stx : Syntax) : Traverser :=
{ t with cur := stx }
/-- Advance to the `idx`-th child of the current node. -/
def down (t : Traverser) (idx : Nat) : Traverser :=
if idx < t.cur.getNumArgs then
{ cur := t.cur.getArg idx, parents := t.parents.push $ t.cur.setArg idx arbitrary, idxs := t.idxs.push idx }
else
{ cur := Syntax.missing, parents := t.parents.push t.cur, idxs := t.idxs.push idx }
/-- Advance to the parent of the current node, if any. -/
def up (t : Traverser) : Traverser :=
if t.parents.size > 0 then
let cur := if t.idxs.back < t.parents.back.getNumArgs then t.parents.back.setArg t.idxs.back t.cur else t.parents.back
{ cur := cur, parents := t.parents.pop, idxs := t.idxs.pop }
else
t
/-- Advance to the left sibling of the current node, if any. -/
def left (t : Traverser) : Traverser :=
if t.parents.size > 0 then
t.up.down (t.idxs.back - 1)
else
t
/-- Advance to the right sibling of the current node, if any. -/
def right (t : Traverser) : Traverser :=
if t.parents.size > 0 then
t.up.down (t.idxs.back + 1)
else
t
end Traverser
/-- Monad class that gives read/write access to a `Traverser`. -/
class MonadTraverser (m : Type → Type) where
st : MonadState Traverser m
namespace MonadTraverser
variable {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [t : MonadTraverser m]
def getCur : m Syntax := Traverser.cur <$> t.st.get
def setCur (stx : Syntax) : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.setCur stx)
def goDown (idx : Nat) : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.down idx)
def goUp : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.up)
def goLeft : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.left)
def goRight : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.right)
def getIdx : m Nat := do
let st ← t.st.get
st.idxs.back?.getD 0
end MonadTraverser
end Syntax
namespace SyntaxNode
@[inline] def getIdAt (n : SyntaxNode) (i : Nat) : Name :=
(n.getArg i).getId
end SyntaxNode
def mkListNode (args : Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
Syntax.node nullKind args
namespace Syntax
-- quotation node kinds are formed from a unique quotation name plus "quot"
def isQuot : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.node (Name.str _ "quot" _) _ => true
| Syntax.node `Lean.Parser.Term.dynamicQuot _ => true
| _ => false
def getQuotContent (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
if stx.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.dynamicQuot then
stx[3]
else
stx[1]
-- antiquotation node kinds are formed from the original node kind (if any) plus "antiquot"
def isAntiquot : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.node (Name.str _ "antiquot" _) _ => true
| _ => false
def mkAntiquotNode (term : Syntax) (nesting := 0) (name : Option String := none) (kind := Name.anonymous) : Syntax :=
let nesting := mkNullNode (mkArray nesting (mkAtom "$"))
let term := match term.isIdent with
| true => term
| false => mkNode `antiquotNestedExpr #[mkAtom "(", term, mkAtom ")"]
let name := match name with
| some name => mkNode `antiquotName #[mkAtom ":", mkAtom name]
| none => mkNullNode
mkNode (kind ++ `antiquot) #[mkAtom "$", nesting, term, name]
-- Antiquotations can be escaped as in `$$x`, which is useful for nesting macros. Also works for antiquotation splices.
def isEscapedAntiquot (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
!stx[1].getArgs.isEmpty
-- Also works for antiquotation splices.
def unescapeAntiquot (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
if isAntiquot stx then
stx.setArg 1 $ mkNullNode stx[1].getArgs.pop
else
stx
-- Also works for token antiquotations.
def getAntiquotTerm (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
let e := if stx.isAntiquot then stx[2] else stx[3]
if e.isIdent then e
else
-- `e` is from `"(" >> termParser >> ")"`
e[1]
def antiquotKind? : Syntax → Option SyntaxNodeKind
| Syntax.node (Name.str k "antiquot" _) args =>
if args[3].isOfKind `antiquotName then some k
else
-- we treat all antiquotations where the kind was left implicit (`$e`) the same (see `elimAntiquotChoices`)
some Name.anonymous
| _ => none
-- An "antiquotation splice" is something like `$[...]?` or `$[...]*`.
def antiquotSpliceKind? : Syntax → Option SyntaxNodeKind
| Syntax.node (Name.str k "antiquot_scope" _) args => some k
| _ => none
def isAntiquotSplice (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
antiquotSpliceKind? stx |>.isSome
def getAntiquotSpliceContents (stx : Syntax) : Array Syntax :=
stx[3].getArgs
-- `$[..],*` or `$x,*` ~> `,*`
def getAntiquotSpliceSuffix (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
if stx.isAntiquotSplice then
stx[5]
else
stx[1]
def mkAntiquotSpliceNode (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (contents : Array Syntax) (suffix : String) (nesting := 0) : Syntax :=
let nesting := mkNullNode (mkArray nesting (mkAtom "$"))
mkNode (kind ++ `antiquot_splice) #[mkAtom "$", nesting, mkAtom "[", mkNullNode contents, mkAtom "]", mkAtom suffix]
-- `$x,*` etc.
def antiquotSuffixSplice? : Syntax → Option SyntaxNodeKind
| Syntax.node (Name.str k "antiquot_suffix_splice" _) args => some k
| _ => none
def isAntiquotSuffixSplice (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
antiquotSuffixSplice? stx |>.isSome
-- `$x` in the example above
def getAntiquotSuffixSpliceInner (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
stx[0]
def mkAntiquotSuffixSpliceNode (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (inner : Syntax) (suffix : String) : Syntax :=
mkNode (kind ++ `antiquot_suffix_splice) #[inner, mkAtom suffix]
def isTokenAntiquot (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
stx.isOfKind `token_antiquot
def isAnyAntiquot (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
stx.isAntiquot || stx.isAntiquotSplice || stx.isAntiquotSuffixSplice || stx.isTokenAntiquot
end Syntax
end Lean
|
a2c9e2d89f6b2bc9f2b2752ab2e8416667435e50 | 6c7d3318f9e137ff78c170e5986abe531d316cd1 | /inClassNotes/02_polymorphicTypes.lean | 0f99e140accd6d05e533a7edc0a0ac11cc4f8699 | [] | no_license | sethfertig/complogic-s21 | 3a2c1d90cbb4a9292a8afbe78f46797193f4293f | efb63424d873def3945a04238327b2551af67500 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,812,457,719 | 1,613,059,434,000 | 1,613,059,434,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,457 | lean | namespace hidden
/-
Inductive, aka algebraic, data types
- sum types
- product types and case analysis
- parametrically polymorphic
- sum of product types and destructuring
-/
/-
SUM TYPES
A value of such a type is "one of these OR
one of those OR one of something else." SUM
means OR in this sense.
-/
inductive romanNumeral : Type
| I : romanNumeral
| II : romanNumeral
| III : romanNumeral
| IV : romanNumeral
| V : romanNumeral
-- The empty data type
inductive empty : Type -- Look Ma, no terms ("uninhabited")
def x : empty := _
def funny : empty → empty
| e := e
-- The unit data type
inductive unit : Type -- A type with one value (void)
| star : unit
-- The bool data type
inductive bool : Type -- Two values
| tt : bool
| ff -- leave type to be inferred
-- An inductive type with seven values
inductive day : Type
| sun
| mon
| tue
| wed
| thu
| fri
| sat
open day
/-
CASE ANALYSIS
We generally define functions that consume
values of sum types by case analysis. To know
what to return, we need to know what form of
value we got as an argument.
-/
def next_day : day → day
| sun := mon
| mon := tue
| tue := wed
| wed := thu
| thu := fri
| fri := sat
| sat := sun
/-
The left side of a case is usually called
a pattern. Argument values are matched to
patterns in the order in which patterns are
using a "unification" algorithm (more on that
later). Function evaluation finds the first
pattern that matches and return the result
obtained by evaluating the expression on the
right hand side of that pattern-matching
rule.
-/
#reduce next_day sun
#reduce next_day sat
/-
The _ character can be used to match any value.
All functions in Lean must be total. We often use
_ to cover all other cases no covered explicitly
so far.
-/
def isWeekday : day → bool
| sat := bool.ff
| sun := bool.ff
| _ := bool.tt
/-
PRODUCT TYPES (records, structures)
-/
/-
A product type has one constructor
that takes and bundles up values of
zero or more other types into records,
or structures.
In a value of a product type there a
value for the first field of an object
AND a value for the secon AND a value
for the third, etc. PRODUCT in this
sense means AND.
-/
/-
Note: The empty type can be viewed as
also a product type with zero fields.
-/
/-
We now define a product type with
one field.
To understand such type definitions
you need to understand that a
constructor, C, is like a function,
with zero or more arguments, the only
thing it does is to package up its
arguments into a term, (C a₀ ... aₙ).
A value of our box type can thus be
visualized as a box (term) with a
single value, the argument to box.mk,
inside.
As usual there are several syntactic
variants for defining inductive types.
-/
inductive box_nat' : Type
| mk (val : ℕ) -- : box_nat'
inductive box_nat'' : Type
| mk : ℕ → box_nat''
structure box_nat''' : Type :=
mk :: (val : ℕ)
structure box_nat := -- readable
(val : ℕ)
-- Let's create such a value
def aBox := box_nat.mk 3
-- What does the resulting term look like?
#reduce aBox
/-
Given a box, we "destructure" it using
"pattern matching" to get at the values
that were used in its construction: in
this case to access the ℕ inside a box.
Here we see a more interesting form of
unification. The key ideas are (1) the
algorithm determines whether a pattern
matches, (2) it binds names to parts of
the object being matched accordingly.
-/
def unbox_nat : box_nat → ℕ
-- box_nat.mk 3 -- pattern matching, unification
| (box_nat.mk n) := n
#eval unbox_nat aBox
/-
When you use the "structure" syntax, Lean
generates a projection (accessor) function
for each field automatically.
-/
#eval box_nat.val aBox
#eval aBox.val -- Preferred notation
/-
Polymorphic types
-/
/-
We immediately see the same problem
as with functions: the need for a many
variants varying only in the type of
value "contained in the box".
The solution is analogous: make our
type polymorphic by having it take a
type-valued parameter and by making
the value it contains of the type
that is the value of that parameter.
-/
structure box (α : Type) : Type :=
(val : α)
def nat_box : box nat := box.mk 3
def bool_box : box bool := box.mk bool.tt
#check nat_box
#check box
def str_box : box string:= box.mk "Hello, Lean!"
def bool_box' := box.mk bool.tt
#eval nat_box.val
#eval str_box.val
#eval bool_box.val
def fun_box : box (nat → nat) := box.mk (nat.succ)
#check nat.succ
#eval nat.succ 4
/-
Polymorphic product types with two
fields -- the type of ordered pairs --
and two type parameters accordingly.
-/
structure prod (α β : Type) : Type :=
(fst : α)
(snd : β)
-- Self-test: What's the type of prod?
-- "Introduce" some pairs
def pair1 := prod.mk 4 "Hi"
#check pair1
#check prod
#eval prod.fst pair1
#eval prod.snd pair1
#eval pair1.fst
#eval pair1.snd
def pair2 := prod.mk "Bye" tt
-- "Eliminate" some pairs
#eval pair1.fst
#eval pair1.snd
#eval pair2.fst
#eval pair2.snd
#check prod
structure phythagorean_triple : Type :=
(a : ℕ)
(b : ℕ)
(c : ℕ)
(cert: a*a + b*b = c*c)
def py_tri : phythagorean_triple :=
phythagorean_triple.mk
3 4 5
rfl
#reduce py_tri.cert -- construct proof that 25 = 25
def py_tri_bad : phythagorean_triple :=
phythagorean_triple.mk
3 4 6
rfl -- can't construct proof that 25 = 36
-- Try that in mere Haskell. No way!
end hidden
|
ff0c6e72209837694e4e16ac541c6033cb462e9f | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/order/filter/cofinite.lean | b76cfd963457e51986e9622297c5326c8e25562d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,942 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import order.filter.at_top_bot
/-!
# The cofinite filter
In this file we define
`cofinite`: the filter of sets with finite complement
and prove its basic properties. In particular, we prove that for `ℕ` it is equal to `at_top`.
## TODO
Define filters for other cardinalities of the complement.
-/
open set
open_locale classical
variables {α : Type*}
namespace filter
/-- The cofinite filter is the filter of subsets whose complements are finite. -/
def cofinite : filter α :=
{ sets := {s | finite sᶜ},
univ_sets := by simp only [compl_univ, finite_empty, mem_set_of_eq],
sets_of_superset := assume s t (hs : finite sᶜ) (st: s ⊆ t),
hs.subset $ compl_subset_compl.2 st,
inter_sets := assume s t (hs : finite sᶜ) (ht : finite (tᶜ)),
by simp only [compl_inter, finite.union, ht, hs, mem_set_of_eq] }
@[simp] lemma mem_cofinite {s : set α} : s ∈ (@cofinite α) ↔ finite sᶜ := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in cofinite, p x) ↔ finite {x | ¬p x} := iff.rfl
instance cofinite_ne_bot [infinite α] : ne_bot (@cofinite α) :=
⟨mt empty_in_sets_eq_bot.mpr $ by { simp only [mem_cofinite, compl_empty], exact infinite_univ }⟩
lemma frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in cofinite, p x) ↔ set.infinite {x | p x} :=
by simp only [filter.frequently, filter.eventually, mem_cofinite, compl_set_of, not_not,
set.infinite]
/-- The coproduct of the cofinite filters on two types is the cofinite filter on their product. -/
lemma coprod_cofinite {β : Type*} :
(cofinite : filter α).coprod (cofinite : filter β) = cofinite :=
begin
ext S,
simp only [mem_coprod_iff, exists_prop, mem_comap_sets, mem_cofinite],
split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨A, hAf, hAS⟩, B, hBf, hBS⟩,
rw [← compl_subset_compl, ← preimage_compl] at hAS hBS,
exact (hAf.prod hBf).subset (subset_inter hAS hBS) },
{ intro hS,
refine ⟨⟨(prod.fst '' Sᶜ)ᶜ, _, _⟩, ⟨(prod.snd '' Sᶜ)ᶜ, _, _⟩⟩,
{ simpa using hS.image prod.fst },
{ simpa [compl_subset_comm] using subset_preimage_image prod.fst Sᶜ },
{ simpa using hS.image prod.snd },
{ simpa [compl_subset_comm] using subset_preimage_image prod.snd Sᶜ } },
end
end filter
open filter
lemma set.finite.compl_mem_cofinite {s : set α} (hs : s.finite) : sᶜ ∈ (@cofinite α) :=
mem_cofinite.2 $ (compl_compl s).symm ▸ hs
lemma set.finite.eventually_cofinite_nmem {s : set α} (hs : s.finite) : ∀ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∉ s :=
hs.compl_mem_cofinite
lemma finset.eventually_cofinite_nmem (s : finset α) : ∀ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∉ s :=
s.finite_to_set.eventually_cofinite_nmem
lemma set.infinite_iff_frequently_cofinite {s : set α} :
set.infinite s ↔ (∃ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∈ s) :=
frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite.symm
lemma filter.eventually_cofinite_ne (x : α) : ∀ᶠ a in cofinite, a ≠ x :=
(set.finite_singleton x).eventually_cofinite_nmem
/-- For natural numbers the filters `cofinite` and `at_top` coincide. -/
lemma nat.cofinite_eq_at_top : @cofinite ℕ = at_top :=
begin
ext s,
simp only [mem_cofinite, mem_at_top_sets],
split,
{ assume hs,
use (hs.to_finset.sup id) + 1,
assume b hb,
by_contradiction hbs,
have := hs.to_finset.subset_range_sup_succ (hs.mem_to_finset.2 hbs),
exact not_lt_of_le hb (finset.mem_range.1 this) },
{ rintros ⟨N, hN⟩,
apply (finite_lt_nat N).subset,
assume n hn,
change n < N,
exact lt_of_not_ge (λ hn', hn $ hN n hn') }
end
lemma nat.frequently_at_top_iff_infinite {p : ℕ → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ n in at_top, p n) ↔ set.infinite {n | p n} :=
by simp only [← nat.cofinite_eq_at_top, frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite]
|
7cf9a306868d33fc79ba37ede4bcc354708e93aa | aa5a655c05e5359a70646b7154e7cac59f0b4132 | /src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Rewrite.lean | 8d0c2436ebd07d22329f7755888a77cfb826def4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lambdaxymox/lean4 | ae943c960a42247e06eff25c35338268d07454cb | 278d47c77270664ef29715faab467feac8a0f446 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,891,867,340 | 1,612,500,005,000 | 1,612,500,005,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,409 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Rewrite
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Replace
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Basic
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.ElabTerm
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Location
namespace Lean.Elab.Tactic
open Meta
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Tactic.rewriteSeq] def expandRewriteTactic : Macro := fun stx =>
let seq := stx[1][1].getSepArgs
let loc := stx[2]
return mkNullNode <| seq.map fun rwRule => Syntax.node ``Parser.Tactic.rewrite #[mkAtomFrom rwRule "rewrite ", rwRule, loc]
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Tactic.erewriteSeq] def expandERewriteTactic : Macro := fun stx =>
let seq := stx[1][1].getSepArgs
let loc := stx[2]
return mkNullNode <| seq.map fun rwRule => Syntax.node ``Parser.Tactic.erewrite #[mkAtomFrom rwRule "erewrite ", rwRule, loc]
def rewriteTarget (stx : Syntax) (symm : Bool) (mode : TransparencyMode) : TacticM Unit := do
let (g, gs) ← getMainGoal
withMVarContext g do
let e ← elabTerm stx none true
let target ← instantiateMVars (← getMVarDecl g).type
let r ← rewrite g target e symm (mode := mode)
let g' ← replaceTargetEq g r.eNew r.eqProof
setGoals (g' :: r.mvarIds ++ gs)
def rewriteLocalDeclFVarId (stx : Syntax) (symm : Bool) (fvarId : FVarId) (mode : TransparencyMode) : TacticM Unit := do
let (g, gs) ← getMainGoal
withMVarContext g do
let e ← elabTerm stx none true
let localDecl ← getLocalDecl fvarId
let rwResult ← rewrite g localDecl.type e symm (mode := mode)
let replaceResult ← replaceLocalDecl g fvarId rwResult.eNew rwResult.eqProof
setGoals (replaceResult.mvarId :: rwResult.mvarIds ++ gs)
def rewriteLocalDecl (stx : Syntax) (symm : Bool) (userName : Name) (mode : TransparencyMode) : TacticM Unit :=
withMainMVarContext do
let localDecl ← getLocalDeclFromUserName userName
rewriteLocalDeclFVarId stx symm localDecl.fvarId mode
def rewriteAll (stx : Syntax) (symm : Bool) (mode : TransparencyMode) : TacticM Unit := do
let worked ← «try» $ rewriteTarget stx symm mode
withMainMVarContext do
let mut worked := worked
-- We must traverse backwards because `replaceLocalDecl` uses the revert/intro idiom
for fvarId in (← getLCtx).getFVarIds.reverse do
worked := worked || (← «try» $ rewriteLocalDeclFVarId stx symm fvarId mode)
unless worked do
let (mvarId, _) ← getMainGoal
throwTacticEx `rewrite mvarId "did not find instance of the pattern in the current goal"
def evalRewriteCore (mode : TransparencyMode) : Tactic := fun stx => do
let rule := stx[1]
let symm := !rule[0].isNone
let term := rule[1]
let loc := expandOptLocation stx[2]
match loc with
| Location.target => rewriteTarget term symm mode
| Location.localDecls userNames => userNames.forM (rewriteLocalDecl term symm · mode)
| Location.wildcard => rewriteAll term symm mode
/-
```
def rwRule := parser! optional (unicodeSymbol "←" "<-") >> termParser
def «rewrite» := parser! "rewrite" >> rwRule >> optional location
```
-/
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.rewrite] def evalRewrite : Tactic :=
evalRewriteCore TransparencyMode.instances
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.erewrite] def evalERewrite : Tactic :=
evalRewriteCore TransparencyMode.default
end Lean.Elab.Tactic
|
4f6a56bfcbf6dda80a13ff7b5ff5b65963d67e08 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/analysis/normed_space/bounded_linear_maps.lean | 9a980a1eab7fde345b911869240ccfa3ae49b1ed | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,596 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import analysis.normed_space.multilinear
import analysis.normed_space.units
import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics
/-!
# Bounded linear maps
This file defines a class stating that a map between normed vector spaces is (bi)linear and
continuous.
Instead of asking for continuity, the definition takes the equivalent condition (because the space
is normed) that `∥f x∥` is bounded by a multiple of `∥x∥`. Hence the "bounded" in the name refers to
`∥f x∥/∥x∥` rather than `∥f x∥` itself.
## Main definitions
* `is_bounded_linear_map`: Class stating that a map `f : E → F` is linear and has `∥f x∥` bounded
by a multiple of `∥x∥`.
* `is_bounded_bilinear_map`: Class stating that a map `f : E × F → G` is bilinear and continuous,
but through the simpler to provide statement that `∥f (x, y)∥` is bounded by a multiple of
`∥x∥ * ∥y∥`
* `is_bounded_bilinear_map.linear_deriv`: Derivative of a continuous bilinear map as a linear map.
* `is_bounded_bilinear_map.deriv`: Derivative of a continuous bilinear map as a continuous linear
map. The proof that it is indeed the derivative is `is_bounded_bilinear_map.has_fderiv_at` in
`analysis.calculus.fderiv`.
## Main theorems
* `is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous`: A bounded bilinear map is continuous.
* `continuous_linear_equiv.is_open`: The continuous linear equivalences are an open subset of the
set of continuous linear maps between a pair of Banach spaces. Placed in this file because its
proof uses `is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous`.
## Notes
The main use of this file is `is_bounded_bilinear_map`. The file `analysis.normed_space.multilinear`
already expounds the theory of multilinear maps, but the `2`-variables case is sufficiently simpler
to currently deserve its own treatment.
`is_bounded_linear_map` is effectively an unbundled version of `continuous_linear_map` (defined
in `topology.algebra.module.basic`, theory over normed spaces developed in
`analysis.normed_space.operator_norm`), albeit the name disparity. A bundled
`continuous_linear_map` is to be preferred over a `is_bounded_linear_map` hypothesis. Historical
artifact, really.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators topological_space
open filter (tendsto) metric
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
{G : Type*} [normed_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G]
/-- A function `f` satisfies `is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f` if it is linear and satisfies the
inequality `∥f x∥ ≤ M * ∥x∥` for some positive constant `M`. -/
structure is_bounded_linear_map (𝕜 : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F] (f : E → F)
extends is_linear_map 𝕜 f : Prop :=
(bound : ∃ M, 0 < M ∧ ∀ x : E, ∥f x∥ ≤ M * ∥x∥)
lemma is_linear_map.with_bound
{f : E → F} (hf : is_linear_map 𝕜 f) (M : ℝ) (h : ∀ x : E, ∥f x∥ ≤ M * ∥x∥) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f :=
⟨ hf, classical.by_cases
(assume : M ≤ 0, ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ x,
(h x).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (this.trans zero_le_one) (norm_nonneg x)⟩)
(assume : ¬ M ≤ 0, ⟨M, lt_of_not_ge this, h⟩)⟩
/-- A continuous linear map satisfies `is_bounded_linear_map` -/
lemma continuous_linear_map.is_bounded_linear_map (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f :=
{ bound := f.bound,
..f.to_linear_map.is_linear }
namespace is_bounded_linear_map
/-- Construct a linear map from a function `f` satisfying `is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f`. -/
def to_linear_map (f : E → F) (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) : E →ₗ[𝕜] F :=
(is_linear_map.mk' _ h.to_is_linear_map)
/-- Construct a continuous linear map from is_bounded_linear_map -/
def to_continuous_linear_map {f : E → F} (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
{ cont := let ⟨C, Cpos, hC⟩ := hf.bound in (to_linear_map f hf).continuous_of_bound C hC,
..to_linear_map f hf}
lemma zero : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ (x:E), (0:F)) :=
(0 : E →ₗ[𝕜] F).is_linear.with_bound 0 $ by simp [le_refl]
lemma id : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ (x:E), x) :=
linear_map.id.is_linear.with_bound 1 $ by simp [le_refl]
lemma fst : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ x : E × F, x.1) :=
begin
refine (linear_map.fst 𝕜 E F).is_linear.with_bound 1 (λ x, _),
rw one_mul,
exact le_max_left _ _
end
lemma snd : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ x : E × F, x.2) :=
begin
refine (linear_map.snd 𝕜 E F).is_linear.with_bound 1 (λ x, _),
rw one_mul,
exact le_max_right _ _
end
variables {f g : E → F}
lemma smul (c : 𝕜) (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (c • f) :=
let ⟨hlf, M, hMp, hM⟩ := hf in
(c • hlf.mk' f).is_linear.with_bound (∥c∥ * M) $ λ x,
calc ∥c • f x∥ = ∥c∥ * ∥f x∥ : norm_smul c (f x)
... ≤ ∥c∥ * (M * ∥x∥) : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hM _) (norm_nonneg _)
... = (∥c∥ * M) * ∥x∥ : (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
lemma neg (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ e, -f e) :=
begin
rw show (λ e, -f e) = (λ e, (-1 : 𝕜) • f e), { funext, simp },
exact smul (-1) hf
end
lemma add (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) (hg : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 g) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ e, f e + g e) :=
let ⟨hlf, Mf, hMfp, hMf⟩ := hf in
let ⟨hlg, Mg, hMgp, hMg⟩ := hg in
(hlf.mk' _ + hlg.mk' _).is_linear.with_bound (Mf + Mg) $ λ x,
calc ∥f x + g x∥ ≤ Mf * ∥x∥ + Mg * ∥x∥ : norm_add_le_of_le (hMf x) (hMg x)
... ≤ (Mf + Mg) * ∥x∥ : by rw add_mul
lemma sub (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) (hg : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 g) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ e, f e - g e) :=
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using add hf (neg hg)
lemma comp {g : F → G}
(hg : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 g) (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (g ∘ f) :=
(hg.to_continuous_linear_map.comp hf.to_continuous_linear_map).is_bounded_linear_map
protected lemma tendsto (x : E) (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
let ⟨hf, M, hMp, hM⟩ := hf in
tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 $
squeeze_zero (λ e, norm_nonneg _)
(λ e,
calc ∥f e - f x∥ = ∥hf.mk' f (e - x)∥ : by rw (hf.mk' _).map_sub e x; refl
... ≤ M * ∥e - x∥ : hM (e - x))
(suffices tendsto (λ (e : E), M * ∥e - x∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (M * 0)), by simpa,
tendsto_const_nhds.mul (tendsto_norm_sub_self _))
lemma continuous (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) : continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ _, hf.tendsto _
lemma lim_zero_bounded_linear_map (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
tendsto f (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) :=
(hf.1.mk' _).map_zero ▸ continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 hf.continuous 0
section
open asymptotics filter
theorem is_O_id {f : E → F} (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) (l : filter E) :
is_O f (λ x, x) l :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hM⟩ := h.bound in is_O.of_bound _ (mem_of_superset univ_mem (λ x _, hM x))
theorem is_O_comp {E : Type*} {g : F → G} (hg : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 g)
{f : E → F} (l : filter E) : is_O (λ x', g (f x')) f l :=
(hg.is_O_id ⊤).comp_tendsto le_top
theorem is_O_sub {f : E → F} (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f)
(l : filter E) (x : E) : is_O (λ x', f (x' - x)) (λ x', x' - x) l :=
is_O_comp h l
end
end is_bounded_linear_map
section
variables {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι]
/-- Taking the cartesian product of two continuous multilinear maps
is a bounded linear operation. -/
lemma is_bounded_linear_map_prod_multilinear
{E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, normed_group (E i)] [∀ i, normed_space 𝕜 (E i)] :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜
(λ p : (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E F) × (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G), p.1.prod p.2) :=
{ map_add := λ p₁ p₂, by { ext1 m, refl },
map_smul := λ c p, by { ext1 m, refl },
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ p, begin
rw one_mul,
apply continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) (λ m, _),
rw [continuous_multilinear_map.prod_apply, norm_prod_le_iff],
split,
{ exact (p.1.le_op_norm m).trans
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (norm_fst_le p) (finset.prod_nonneg (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _))) },
{ exact (p.2.le_op_norm m).trans
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (norm_snd_le p) (finset.prod_nonneg (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _))) },
end⟩ }
/-- Given a fixed continuous linear map `g`, associating to a continuous multilinear map `f` the
continuous multilinear map `f (g m₁, ..., g mₙ)` is a bounded linear operation. -/
lemma is_bounded_linear_map_continuous_multilinear_map_comp_linear (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : ι), E) F,
f.comp_continuous_linear_map (λ _, g)) :=
begin
refine is_linear_map.with_bound ⟨λ f₁ f₂, by { ext m, refl }, λ c f, by { ext m, refl }⟩
(∥g∥ ^ (fintype.card ι)) (λ f, _),
apply continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ _ (λ m, _),
{ apply_rules [mul_nonneg, pow_nonneg, norm_nonneg] },
calc ∥f (g ∘ m)∥ ≤
∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥g (m i)∥ : f.le_op_norm _
... ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, (∥g∥ * ∥m i∥) : begin
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _),
exact finset.prod_le_prod (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _) (λ i hi, g.le_op_norm _)
end
... = ∥g∥ ^ fintype.card ι * ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ :
by { simp [finset.prod_mul_distrib, finset.card_univ], ring }
end
end
section bilinear_map
variable (𝕜)
/-- A map `f : E × F → G` satisfies `is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f` if it is bilinear and
continuous. -/
structure is_bounded_bilinear_map (f : E × F → G) : Prop :=
(add_left : ∀ (x₁ x₂ : E) (y : F), f (x₁ + x₂, y) = f (x₁, y) + f (x₂, y))
(smul_left : ∀ (c : 𝕜) (x : E) (y : F), f (c • x, y) = c • f (x, y))
(add_right : ∀ (x : E) (y₁ y₂ : F), f (x, y₁ + y₂) = f (x, y₁) + f (x, y₂))
(smul_right : ∀ (c : 𝕜) (x : E) (y : F), f (x, c • y) = c • f (x,y))
(bound : ∃ C > 0, ∀ (x : E) (y : F), ∥f (x, y)∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥ * ∥y∥)
variable {𝕜}
variable {f : E × F → G}
lemma continuous_linear_map.is_bounded_bilinear_map (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : E × F, f x.1 x.2) :=
{ add_left := λ x₁ x₂ y, by rw [f.map_add, continuous_linear_map.add_apply],
smul_left := λ c x y, by rw [f.map_smul _, continuous_linear_map.smul_apply],
add_right := λ x, (f x).map_add,
smul_right := λ c x y, (f x).map_smul c y,
bound := ⟨max ∥f∥ 1, zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _),
λ x y, (f.le_op_norm₂ x y).trans $
by apply_rules [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right, norm_nonneg, le_max_left]⟩ }
protected lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_O (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) :
asymptotics.is_O f (λ p : E × F, ∥p.1∥ * ∥p.2∥) ⊤ :=
let ⟨C, Cpos, hC⟩ := h.bound in asymptotics.is_O.of_bound _ $
filter.eventually_of_forall $ λ ⟨x, y⟩, by simpa [mul_assoc] using hC x y
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_O_comp {α : Type*} (H : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f)
{g : α → E} {h : α → F} {l : filter α} :
asymptotics.is_O (λ x, f (g x, h x)) (λ x, ∥g x∥ * ∥h x∥) l :=
H.is_O.comp_tendsto le_top
protected lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_O' (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) :
asymptotics.is_O f (λ p : E × F, ∥p∥ * ∥p∥) ⊤ :=
h.is_O.trans (asymptotics.is_O_fst_prod'.norm_norm.mul asymptotics.is_O_snd_prod'.norm_norm)
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.map_sub_left (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) {x y : E} {z : F} :
f (x - y, z) = f (x, z) - f(y, z) :=
calc f (x - y, z) = f (x + (-1 : 𝕜) • y, z) : by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
... = f (x, z) + (-1 : 𝕜) • f (y, z) : by simp only [h.add_left, h.smul_left]
... = f (x, z) - f (y, z) : by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.map_sub_right (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) {x : E} {y z : F} :
f (x, y - z) = f (x, y) - f (x, z) :=
calc f (x, y - z) = f (x, y + (-1 : 𝕜) • z) : by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
... = f (x, y) + (-1 : 𝕜) • f (x, z) : by simp only [h.add_right, h.smul_right]
... = f (x, y) - f (x, z) : by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) :
continuous f :=
begin
have one_ne : (1:ℝ) ≠ 0 := by simp,
obtain ⟨C, (Cpos : 0 < C), hC⟩ := h.bound,
rw continuous_iff_continuous_at,
intros x,
have H : ∀ (a:E) (b:F), ∥f (a, b)∥ ≤ C * ∥∥a∥ * ∥b∥∥,
{ intros a b,
simpa [mul_assoc] using hC a b },
have h₁ : asymptotics.is_o (λ e : E × F, f (e.1 - x.1, e.2)) (λ e, (1:ℝ)) (𝓝 x),
{ refine (asymptotics.is_O_of_le' (𝓝 x) (λ e, H (e.1 - x.1) e.2)).trans_is_o _,
rw asymptotics.is_o_const_iff one_ne,
convert ((continuous_fst.sub continuous_const).norm.mul continuous_snd.norm).continuous_at,
{ simp },
apply_instance },
have h₂ : asymptotics.is_o (λ e : E × F, f (x.1, e.2 - x.2)) (λ e, (1:ℝ)) (𝓝 x),
{ refine (asymptotics.is_O_of_le' (𝓝 x) (λ e, H x.1 (e.2 - x.2))).trans_is_o _,
rw asymptotics.is_o_const_iff one_ne,
convert (continuous_const.mul (continuous_snd.sub continuous_const).norm).continuous_at,
{ simp },
apply_instance },
have := h₁.add h₂,
rw asymptotics.is_o_const_iff one_ne at this,
change tendsto _ _ _,
convert this.add_const (f x),
{ ext e,
simp [h.map_sub_left, h.map_sub_right], },
{ simp }
end
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous_left (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) {e₂ : F} :
continuous (λe₁, f (e₁, e₂)) :=
h.continuous.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous_right (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) {e₁ : E} :
continuous (λe₂, f (e₁, e₂)) :=
h.continuous.comp (continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id)
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_bounded_linear_map_left (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) (y : F) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ x, f (x, y)) :=
{ map_add := λ x x', h.add_left _ _ _,
map_smul := λ c x, h.smul_left _ _ _,
bound := begin
rcases h.bound with ⟨C, C_pos, hC⟩,
refine ⟨C * (∥y∥ + 1), mul_pos C_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le (zero_lt_one) (by simp)), λ x, _⟩,
have : ∥y∥ ≤ ∥y∥ + 1, by simp [zero_le_one],
calc ∥f (x, y)∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ : hC x y
... ≤ C * ∥x∥ * (∥y∥ + 1) :
by apply_rules [norm_nonneg, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left, le_of_lt C_pos, mul_nonneg]
... = C * (∥y∥ + 1) * ∥x∥ : by ring
end }
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_bounded_linear_map_right
(h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) (x : E) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ y, f (x, y)) :=
{ map_add := λ y y', h.add_right _ _ _,
map_smul := λ c y, h.smul_right _ _ _,
bound := begin
rcases h.bound with ⟨C, C_pos, hC⟩,
refine ⟨C * (∥x∥ + 1), mul_pos C_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le (zero_lt_one) (by simp)), λ y, _⟩,
have : ∥x∥ ≤ ∥x∥ + 1, by simp [zero_le_one],
calc ∥f (x, y)∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ : hC x y
... ≤ C * (∥x∥ + 1) * ∥y∥ :
by apply_rules [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right, norm_nonneg, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left,
le_of_lt C_pos]
end }
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul {𝕜' : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜']
[normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [normed_space 𝕜' E]
[is_scalar_tower 𝕜 𝕜' E] :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (p : 𝕜' × E), p.1 • p.2) :=
{ add_left := add_smul,
smul_left := λ c x y, by simp [smul_assoc],
add_right := smul_add,
smul_right := λ c x y, by simp [smul_assoc, smul_algebra_smul_comm],
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ x y, by simp [norm_smul] ⟩ }
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_mul :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (p : 𝕜 × 𝕜), p.1 * p.2) :=
by simp_rw ← smul_eq_mul; exact is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (p : (E →L[𝕜] F) × (F →L[𝕜] G)), p.2.comp p.1) :=
{ add_left := λ x₁ x₂ y, begin
ext z,
change y (x₁ z + x₂ z) = y (x₁ z) + y (x₂ z),
rw y.map_add
end,
smul_left := λ c x y, begin
ext z,
change y (c • (x z)) = c • y (x z),
rw continuous_linear_map.map_smul
end,
add_right := λ x y₁ y₂, rfl,
smul_right := λ c x y, rfl,
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ x y, calc
∥continuous_linear_map.comp ((x, y).snd) ((x, y).fst)∥
≤ ∥y∥ * ∥x∥ : continuous_linear_map.op_norm_comp_le _ _
... = 1 * ∥x∥ * ∥ y∥ : by ring ⟩ }
lemma continuous_linear_map.is_bounded_linear_map_comp_left (g : F →L[𝕜] G) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ (f : E →L[𝕜] F), continuous_linear_map.comp g f) :=
is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp.is_bounded_linear_map_left _
lemma continuous_linear_map.is_bounded_linear_map_comp_right (f : E →L[𝕜] F) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ (g : F →L[𝕜] G), continuous_linear_map.comp g f) :=
is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp.is_bounded_linear_map_right _
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_apply :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ p : (E →L[𝕜] F) × E, p.1 p.2) :=
{ add_left := by simp,
smul_left := by simp,
add_right := by simp,
smul_right := by simp,
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, by simp [continuous_linear_map.le_op_norm]⟩ }
/-- The function `continuous_linear_map.smul_right`, associating to a continuous linear map
`f : E → 𝕜` and a scalar `c : F` the tensor product `f ⊗ c` as a continuous linear map from `E` to
`F`, is a bounded bilinear map. -/
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul_right :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜
(λ p, (continuous_linear_map.smul_right : (E →L[𝕜] 𝕜) → F → (E →L[𝕜] F)) p.1 p.2) :=
{ add_left := λ m₁ m₂ f, by { ext z, simp [add_smul] },
smul_left := λ c m f, by { ext z, simp [mul_smul] },
add_right := λ m f₁ f₂, by { ext z, simp [smul_add] },
smul_right := λ c m f, by { ext z, simp [smul_smul, mul_comm] },
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ m f, by simp⟩ }
/-- The composition of a continuous linear map with a continuous multilinear map is a bounded
bilinear operation. -/
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp_multilinear {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*}
[decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι] [∀ i, normed_group (E i)] [∀ i, normed_space 𝕜 (E i)] :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ p : (F →L[𝕜] G) × (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E F),
p.1.comp_continuous_multilinear_map p.2) :=
{ add_left := λ g₁ g₂ f, by { ext m, refl },
smul_left := λ c g f, by { ext m, refl },
add_right := λ g f₁ f₂, by { ext m, simp },
smul_right := λ c g f, by { ext m, simp },
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ g f, begin
apply continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ _ (λ m, _),
{ apply_rules [mul_nonneg, zero_le_one, norm_nonneg] },
calc ∥g (f m)∥ ≤ ∥g∥ * ∥f m∥ : g.le_op_norm _
... ≤ ∥g∥ * (∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (f.le_op_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
... = 1 * ∥g∥ * ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ : by ring
end⟩ }
/-- Definition of the derivative of a bilinear map `f`, given at a point `p` by
`q ↦ f(p.1, q.2) + f(q.1, p.2)` as in the standard formula for the derivative of a product.
We define this function here as a linear map `E × F →ₗ[𝕜] G`, then `is_bounded_bilinear_map.deriv`
strengthens it to a continuous linear map `E × F →L[𝕜] G`.
``. -/
def is_bounded_bilinear_map.linear_deriv (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) (p : E × F) :
E × F →ₗ[𝕜] G :=
{ to_fun := λ q, f (p.1, q.2) + f (q.1, p.2),
map_add' := λ q₁ q₂, begin
change f (p.1, q₁.2 + q₂.2) + f (q₁.1 + q₂.1, p.2) =
f (p.1, q₁.2) + f (q₁.1, p.2) + (f (p.1, q₂.2) + f (q₂.1, p.2)),
simp [h.add_left, h.add_right], abel
end,
map_smul' := λ c q, begin
change f (p.1, c • q.2) + f (c • q.1, p.2) = c • (f (p.1, q.2) + f (q.1, p.2)),
simp [h.smul_left, h.smul_right, smul_add]
end }
/-- The derivative of a bounded bilinear map at a point `p : E × F`, as a continuous linear map
from `E × F` to `G`. The statement that this is indeed the derivative of `f` is
`is_bounded_bilinear_map.has_fderiv_at` in `analysis.calculus.fderiv`. -/
def is_bounded_bilinear_map.deriv (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) (p : E × F) : E × F →L[𝕜] G :=
(h.linear_deriv p).mk_continuous_of_exists_bound $ begin
rcases h.bound with ⟨C, Cpos, hC⟩,
refine ⟨C * ∥p.1∥ + C * ∥p.2∥, λ q, _⟩,
calc ∥f (p.1, q.2) + f (q.1, p.2)∥
≤ C * ∥p.1∥ * ∥q.2∥ + C * ∥q.1∥ * ∥p.2∥ : norm_add_le_of_le (hC _ _) (hC _ _)
... ≤ C * ∥p.1∥ * ∥q∥ + C * ∥q∥ * ∥p.2∥ : begin
apply add_le_add,
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(le_max_right _ _) (mul_nonneg (le_of_lt Cpos) (norm_nonneg _)),
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (norm_nonneg _),
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_left _ _) (le_of_lt Cpos),
end
... = (C * ∥p.1∥ + C * ∥p.2∥) * ∥q∥ : by ring
end
@[simp] lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_deriv_coe (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) (p q : E × F) :
h.deriv p q = f (p.1, q.2) + f (q.1, p.2) := rfl
variables (𝕜)
/-- The function `lmul_left_right : 𝕜' × 𝕜' → (𝕜' →L[𝕜] 𝕜')` is a bounded bilinear map. -/
lemma continuous_linear_map.lmul_left_right_is_bounded_bilinear
(𝕜' : Type*) [normed_ring 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ p : 𝕜' × 𝕜', continuous_linear_map.lmul_left_right 𝕜 𝕜' p.1 p.2) :=
(continuous_linear_map.lmul_left_right 𝕜 𝕜').is_bounded_bilinear_map
variables {𝕜}
/-- Given a bounded bilinear map `f`, the map associating to a point `p` the derivative of `f` at
`p` is itself a bounded linear map. -/
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_bounded_linear_map_deriv (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ p : E × F, h.deriv p) :=
begin
rcases h.bound with ⟨C, Cpos : 0 < C, hC⟩,
refine is_linear_map.with_bound ⟨λ p₁ p₂, _, λ c p, _⟩ (C + C) (λ p, _),
{ ext; simp [h.add_left, h.add_right]; abel },
{ ext; simp [h.smul_left, h.smul_right, smul_add] },
{ refine continuous_linear_map.op_norm_le_bound _
(mul_nonneg (add_nonneg Cpos.le Cpos.le) (norm_nonneg _)) (λ q, _),
calc ∥f (p.1, q.2) + f (q.1, p.2)∥
≤ C * ∥p.1∥ * ∥q.2∥ + C * ∥q.1∥ * ∥p.2∥ : norm_add_le_of_le (hC _ _) (hC _ _)
... ≤ C * ∥p∥ * ∥q∥ + C * ∥q∥ * ∥p∥ : by apply_rules [add_le_add, mul_le_mul, norm_nonneg,
Cpos.le, le_refl, le_max_left, le_max_right, mul_nonneg]
... = (C + C) * ∥p∥ * ∥q∥ : by ring },
end
end bilinear_map
namespace continuous_linear_equiv
open set
/-!
### The set of continuous linear equivalences between two Banach spaces is open
In this section we establish that the set of continuous linear equivalences between two Banach
spaces is an open subset of the space of linear maps between them.
-/
protected lemma is_open [complete_space E] : is_open (range (coe : (E ≃L[𝕜] F) → (E →L[𝕜] F))) :=
begin
rw [is_open_iff_mem_nhds, forall_range_iff],
refine λ e, is_open.mem_nhds _ (mem_range_self _),
let O : (E →L[𝕜] F) → (E →L[𝕜] E) := λ f, (e.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f,
have h_O : continuous O := is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp.continuous_left,
convert units.is_open.preimage h_O using 1,
ext f',
split,
{ rintros ⟨e', rfl⟩,
exact ⟨(e'.trans e.symm).to_unit, rfl⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨w, hw⟩,
use (units_equiv 𝕜 E w).trans e,
ext x,
simp [coe_fn_coe_base' w, hw] }
end
protected lemma nhds [complete_space E] (e : E ≃L[𝕜] F) :
(range (coe : (E ≃L[𝕜] F) → (E →L[𝕜] F))) ∈ 𝓝 (e : E →L[𝕜] F) :=
is_open.mem_nhds continuous_linear_equiv.is_open (by simp)
end continuous_linear_equiv
|
8e3a969b80b1637dbb3938b5bf78025f1db13fe7 | 03338d7688221ff94beea53202aeb7371a960c3b | /src/action.lean | beb4bd334ade7d31028e6c6ca7b0e3f75146f691 | [] | no_license | dwarn/nielsen-schreier-lean | 6edd2ae9fdc93e2c6b4dfe35c0fb55e36d6ab5ca | 99fb30c0bf321c651edbb7524101604cf0242ea1 | refs/heads/master | 1,617,993,640,671 | 1,584,787,300,000 | 1,584,787,300,000 | 248,867,596 | 3 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 26,885 | lean | import group_theory.free_group
group_theory.group_action
logic.relation
noncomputable theory
open free_group mul_action classical
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
section
parameters {α : Type}
@[reducible] private def G := free_group α
parameters (Q : Type) [mul_action G Q] (r : Q) (trans_act : orbit G r = set.univ)
@[simp] lemma nil_is_id : (mk [] : G) = 1 := rfl
lemma id_is_id (x : Q) : (mk [] : G) • x = x := by simp
lemma invinv (a : α) (b : bool) : mk [(a,b)] * mk [(a,!b)] = 1
:= mul_inv_self _
@[simp] lemma inv_is_inv (x : Q) (a : α) (b : bool)
: mk [(a,b)] • mk [(a,!b)] • x = x
:= by {rw [smul_smul, invinv _ _], simp}
@[simp] lemma is_inv_inv (x : Q) (a : α) (b : bool)
: mk [(a,!b)] • mk [(a,b)] • x = x := begin
have h : mk [(a,!b)] • mk [(a,!!b)] • x = x,
exact inv_is_inv x a (!b),
rwa bnot_bnot at h,
end
lemma cons_smul (p : α × bool) (l : list (α × bool)) (x : Q)
: mk [p] • mk l • x = (mk (p::l):G) • x := by {rwa smul_smul, refl}
inductive edge (s : Q) : Q → Type
| intro (p : α × bool) : edge (mk [p] • s)
variables {s t : Q}
@[simp] def proj : Π {s t}, edge s t → α × bool
| _ _ ⟨_, p⟩ := p
def change_end {s t t'} (h : t = t') : edge s t → edge s t' := λ p, eq.rec p h
@[simp] lemma change_proj : Π {s t t'} (h : t = t') (e : edge s t),
proj (change_end h e) = proj e
| _ _ _ rfl _ := rfl
@[reducible] def pbnot {β : Type} : β × bool → β × bool
| (a, b) := (a, !b)
lemma pbnot_pbnot : ∀ p : α × bool, pbnot (pbnot p) = p
| (a, b) := by simp
@[reducible] def rev : Π {s t}, edge s t → edge t s
| _ _ ⟨s, (a,b)⟩ := change_end (is_inv_inv s a b) ⟨mk [(a,b)] • s, (a,!b)⟩
@[simp] lemma rev_proj : Π {s t} (e : edge s t), proj (rev e) = pbnot (proj e)
| _ _ ⟨s, (a,b)⟩ := by {rw change_proj, refl}
lemma edge_hext : Π {s t t'} {e : edge s t} {e' : edge s t'} (h : proj e = proj e'), e == e'
| _ _ _ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ rfl := heq.rfl
lemma edge_ext {s t} {e e' : edge s t} (h : proj e = proj e') : e = e'
:= eq_of_heq $ edge_hext h
@[simp] lemma rev_rev : Π {s t} (e : edge s t), rev (rev e) = e
| _ _ ⟨s, (a,b)⟩ := by {apply edge_ext, simp}
inductive path : Q → Q → Type
| nil (s : Q) : path s s
| cons {s t t' : Q} (p : path s t) (e : edge t t') : path s t'
instance e_to_p {s t : Q} : has_coe (edge s t) (path s t) := ⟨λ e, path.cons (path.nil _) e⟩
def path_length : Π {s t : Q} (p : path s t), ℕ
| _ _ (path.nil _) := 0
| _ _ (path.cons p _) := path_length p + 1
@[simp] def pconcat : Π {a b c : Q}, path a b → path b c → path a c
| _ _ _ p (path.nil _) := p
| _ _ _ p (path.cons q e) := path.cons (pconcat p q) e
@[simp] def prev : Π {a b : Q}, path a b → path b a
| _ _ (path.nil _) := path.nil _
| _ _ (path.cons q e) := pconcat ↑(rev e) (prev q)
@[simp] def pmul : Π {a b : Q}, path a b → G
| _ _ (path.nil _) := 1
| _ _ (path.cons q e) := mk [proj e] * pmul q
@[simp] lemma pconcat_mul : ∀ {a b c : Q} (p : path a b) (q : path b c),
pmul (pconcat p q) = pmul q * pmul p
| _ _ _ _ (path.nil _) := by simp
| _ _ _ _ (path.cons _ _) := by {simp, rw [pconcat_mul, mul_assoc]}
@[simp] lemma pmul_smul : ∀ {a b : Q} (p : path a b), pmul p • a = b
| _ _ (path.nil _) := by simp
| s _ (path.cons p ⟨t, x⟩) := by {simp, rw [←smul_smul, pmul_smul]}
@[simp] def path_from_list (s : Q) : Π (l : list (α × bool)), Σ t, path s t
| [] := ⟨s, path.nil s⟩
| (p :: l) := ⟨_, path.cons (path_from_list l).2 ⟨_, p⟩⟩
lemma pfl_cons (s : Q) (l : list (α × bool)) (p : α × bool) :
(path_from_list s (p::l)).2 = path.cons (path_from_list s l).2 ⟨_, p⟩ := rfl
lemma pfl_cons' (s : Q) (l : list (α × bool)) (p : α × bool) :
path_from_list s (p::l) = ⟨_, path.cons (path_from_list s l).2 ⟨_, p⟩⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma pfl_concat : Π (s : Q) (l : list (α × bool)) (l' : list (α × bool)),
path_from_list s (l' ++ l) = ⟨_, pconcat (path_from_list s l).2
(path_from_list _ l').2⟩
| s l [] := sigma.eq rfl rfl
| s l (p::l') := begin
have hh : (p::l') ++ l = p::(l'++l), from rfl,
rw [hh, pfl_cons', pfl_concat, pfl_cons],
simp,
end
lemma pfl_end (s : Q) : Π (l : list (α × bool)), (path_from_list s l).1 = mk l • s
| [] := by simp
| (p :: l) := by {simp, rw pfl_end, apply cons_smul}
@[reducible] def list_from_path : Π {s t : Q} (p : path s t), list (α × bool)
| _ _ (path.nil _) := []
| _ _ (path.cons p e) := (proj e) :: list_from_path p
lemma lfp_cons {s t t' : Q} {p : path s t} {e : edge t t'}
: list_from_path (path.cons p e) = (proj e) :: list_from_path p := rfl
lemma path_cons_ext : Π {s t t' : Q} (p : path s t) (e : edge t t'),
(⟨mk [proj e] • t, path.cons p ⟨t, proj e⟩⟩ : Σ x, path s x) = ⟨t', path.cons p e⟩
| s _ _ p ⟨t, a⟩ := rfl
lemma path_from_path : Π {s t : Q} (p : path s t), path_from_list s (list_from_path p) = ⟨t, p⟩
| _ _ (path.nil _) := by simp
| s t' (path.cons p (e:edge t _)) := begin
have h : list_from_path (path.cons p e) = (proj e) :: list_from_path p, from rfl,
rw [h, pfl_cons', path_from_path],
exact path_cons_ext p e,
end
lemma list_from_list (s : Q) : Π (l : list (α × bool)), list_from_path (path_from_list s l).2 = l
| [] := rfl
| (x::l) := begin
rw pfl_cons,
rw lfp_cons,
simp,
apply list_from_list,
end
lemma pmul_list : Π {a b : Q} (p : path a b), pmul p = mk (list_from_path p)
| _ _ (path.nil _) := by simp
| _ _ (path.cons _ _) := by {simp, rw pmul_list, simp}
@[simp] lemma path_length_nil {s : Q} : path_length (path.nil s) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma path_length_cons {s t t' : Q} (p : path s t) (e : edge t t')
: path_length (path.cons p e) = path_length p + 1 := rfl
lemma path_length_zero : Π {s t : Q} (p : path s t), path_length p = 0 → t = s
| _ _ (path.nil _) _ := rfl
| s t (path.cons p e) h := begin
exfalso,
rw path_length_cons at h,
exact (nat.succ_ne_zero _) h
end
def dist_ub (t : Q) (n : ℕ) : Prop := ∃ p : path r t, path_length p = n
lemma dist_ub_from_path {t : Q} (p : path r t) : dist_ub t (path_length p) := ⟨p, rfl⟩
include trans_act
lemma connected (x : Q) : nonempty (path r x) := begin
have hx : x ∈ orbit G r,
rw trans_act,
trivial,
cases hx with g hg,
simp at hg,
induction g with l,
apply nonempty.intro,
rw ←hg,
have p : path r (mk l • r),
rw ←pfl_end,
exact (path_from_list r l).2,
exact p,
simp,
end
lemma dist_is_bounded (t : Q) : ∃ n : ℕ, dist_ub t n := begin
cases (connected t) with p,
use path_length p,
exact dist_ub_from_path p
end
def dist (t : Q) : ℕ := nat.find $ dist_is_bounded t
lemma dist_is_attained (t : Q) : ∃ p : path r t, path_length p = dist t
:= nat.find_spec $ dist_is_bounded t
lemma dist_is_dist (t : Q) (p : path r t) : dist t ≤ path_length p :=
nat.find_min' _ $ dist_ub_from_path p
lemma dist_zero_iff {t : Q} : dist t = 0 ↔ t = r := begin
split,
intro h,
cases dist_is_attained t with p hp,
rw h at hp,
exact path_length_zero p hp,
intro h,
rw h,
rw le_antisymm_iff,
split,
exact dist_is_dist r (path.nil r),
simp,
end
@[simp] lemma dist_root : dist r = 0 := dist_zero_iff.mpr rfl
def inbhd (x : Q) : Type := Σ y : Q, edge y x
def onbhd (x : Q) : Type := Σ y : Q, edge x y
lemma dist_is_lipschitz (x : Q) (q : onbhd x) : dist q.1 ≤ dist x + 1 := begin
cases dist_is_attained x with p hp,
rw ←hp,
exact dist_is_dist q.1 (path.cons p q.2),
end
lemma ex_closer_nbr (x : Q) (hx : x ≠ r) : ∃ p : inbhd x, dist x = dist p.1 + 1 := begin
cases dist_is_attained x with p hp,
cases p with p e,
exfalso,
apply hx,
refl,
use p_t,
use p_e,
rw le_antisymm_iff,
split,
exact dist_is_lipschitz p_t ⟨x, p_e⟩,
rw ←hp,
simp,
exact dist_is_dist _ _
end
def my_closer_nbr (x : Q) (hx : x ≠ r) : {p : inbhd x // dist x = dist p.1 + 1} :=
subtype_of_exists $ ex_closer_nbr x hx
def nb (t : Q) (hn : t ≠ r) : Q := (my_closer_nbr t hn).1.1
def nb_is_nb (t : Q) (hn : t ≠ r) : dist t = dist (nb t hn) + 1 := (my_closer_nbr t hn).2
def nb_edge (t : Q) (hn : t ≠ r) : edge (nb t hn) t := (my_closer_nbr t hn).1.2
section bar
universe v
@[simp] def rec_aux {P : ℕ → Sort v} (f : Π n, (Π m, n = m+1 → P m) → P n) : Π n, P n
| 0 := f 0 (λ m h, false.elim $ nat.succ_ne_zero m h.symm)
| (n+1) := f (n+1) (λ m h, eq.rec (rec_aux n) (nat.succ_inj h))
end bar
section tree_recursion
universe u
parameters {pt : Q → Sort u} (ptr : pt r) (pt_succ : Π t (hn : t ≠ r), pt (nb t hn) → pt t)
@[simp] def helper (n) (f : Π m : ℕ, n = m+1 → (Π x, dist x = m → pt x)) (t) (h : dist t = n) : pt t :=
dite (t=r) (λ hr, eq.rec ptr hr.symm) $ λ hnr,
pt_succ t hnr (f (dist $ nb t hnr) (eq.rec (nb_is_nb t hnr) h) _ rfl)
def tree_recursion (t : Q) : pt t := rec_aux helper (dist t) t rfl
lemma my_ext {t : Q} : Π n (h : dist t = n),
rec_aux helper n t h = rec_aux helper (dist t) t rfl | _ rfl := rfl
lemma recursion_at_root : tree_recursion r = ptr := begin
have hh : tree_recursion r = rec_aux helper 0 r dist_root,
exact (my_ext 0 dist_root).symm,
rw hh,
simp,
end
lemma recursion_away (t : Q) (h : t ≠ r) : tree_recursion t
= pt_succ t h (tree_recursion (nb t h)) := begin
have hh : tree_recursion t = rec_aux helper (dist (nb t h) + 1) t (nb_is_nb t h),
exact (my_ext _ (nb_is_nb t h)).symm,
rw hh,
simp,
apply dif_neg,
end
end tree_recursion
def tree_path : Π t, path r t := tree_recursion (path.nil r)
(λ t hn p, path.cons p (nb_edge t hn))
def is_in_dir_tree {s t : Q} (e : edge s t) : Prop :=
∃ (hn : t ≠ r), (my_closer_nbr t hn).1 = ⟨s, e⟩
def is_in_tree {s t : Q} (e : edge s t) : Prop :=
is_in_dir_tree e ∨ is_in_dir_tree (rev e)
lemma is_in_tree_unfold {s t : Q} (e : edge s t)
: is_in_tree e ↔ is_in_dir_tree e ∨ is_in_dir_tree (rev e) := by refl
lemma is_in_tree_rev {s t : Q} {e : edge s t} : is_in_tree (rev e) ↔ is_in_tree e :=
by {repeat {rw is_in_tree_unfold}, simp, tauto}
lemma not_in_tree_rev {s t : Q} {e : edge s t} : ¬is_in_tree (rev e) ↔ ¬is_in_tree e
:= by {rw is_in_tree_rev}
def R : Type := {p : Σ s t, edge s t // ¬is_in_tree p.2.2 ∧ (proj p.2.2).2}
def to_s (x : R) : Q := x.1.1
def to_t (x : R) : Q := x.1.2.1
def to_edge (x : R) : edge (to_s x) (to_t x) := x.1.2.2
def rmk (s t : Q) (e : edge s t) (h : ¬ is_in_tree e) (hh : (proj e).2)
: R := ⟨⟨s, t, e⟩, h, hh⟩
def rmk_ext : Π {s t : Q} {e e' : edge s t} {h : ¬is_in_tree e} {hh : (proj e).2}
{h' : ¬is_in_tree e'} {hh' : (proj e').2} (he : e = e'), rmk s t e h hh = rmk s t e' h' hh'
| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ rfl := rfl
lemma rev_ori : Π {s t} {e : edge s t}, (proj (rev e)).2 ↔ ¬(proj e).2
| _ _ ⟨s, (a,tt)⟩ := by simp
| _ _ ⟨s, (a,ff)⟩ := by simp
def from_edge {s t : Q} (e : edge s t) (h : ¬is_in_tree e) : R × bool :=
dite (proj e).2 (λ hh, (rmk s t e h hh, tt))
(λ hh, (rmk t s (rev e) (not_in_tree_rev.mpr h) (rev_ori.mpr hh), ff))
lemma from_edge_unfold {s t : Q} (e : edge s t) (h : ¬is_in_tree e) :
from_edge e h = dite (proj e).2 (λ hh, (rmk s t e h hh, tt))
(λ hh, (rmk t s (rev e) (not_in_tree_rev.mpr h) (rev_ori.mpr hh), ff)) := rfl
lemma r_from_r : Π x : R, from_edge (to_edge x) x.2.1 = (x, tt)
| ⟨⟨s, ⟨t, e⟩⟩, ⟨h, hh⟩⟩ := begin
rw [from_edge_unfold, dif_pos],
refl,
assumption,
end
lemma from_edge_rev : Π {s t : Q} (e : edge s t) (h : ¬ is_in_tree e)
(h' : ¬ is_in_tree (rev e)), from_edge (rev e) h' = pbnot (from_edge e h)
| _ _ ⟨s, (a,tt)⟩ h h' := begin
repeat {rw from_edge_unfold},
rw [dif_neg, dif_pos, rmk_ext (rev_rev _)],
refl,
simp,
simp,
end
| _ _ ⟨s, (a,ff)⟩ h h' :=
by {repeat {rw from_edge_unfold}, rw [dif_pos, dif_neg], refl, simp}
def from_edge_maybe {s t} (e : edge s t) : list (R × bool) :=
dite (is_in_tree e) (λ _, []) (list.ret ∘ from_edge e)
lemma fem_unfold {s t} {e : edge s t} :
from_edge_maybe e = dite (is_in_tree e) (λ _, []) (λ h, [from_edge e h]) := rfl
def to_loop (x : R) : path r r :=
pconcat (path.cons (tree_path (to_s x)) (to_edge x)) $ prev $ tree_path (to_t x)
def F := free_group R
@[simp] private def H := stabilizer G r
instance H_is_subgroup : is_subgroup H := mul_action.is_subgroup r
@[simp] noncomputable def plist : Π {a b : Q}, path a b → list (R × bool)
| _ _ (path.nil _) := []
| _ _ (path.cons p e) := from_edge_maybe e ++ plist p
lemma plist_wd : Π {s s' : Q} (h : s = s') (l : list (α × bool)),
plist (path_from_list s l).snd = plist (path_from_list s' l).snd
| _ _ rfl _ := rfl
lemma plist_concat : Π {a b c : Q} (p : path a b) (p' : path b c),
plist (pconcat p p') = plist p' ++ plist p
| a _ _ p (path.nil b) := by simp
| a b c' p (path.cons p' e) := by {simp, rw plist_concat}
lemma tree_path_root : tree_path r = path.nil r
:= recursion_at_root _ _
lemma tree_path_away {x : Q} (hn : x ≠ r)
: tree_path x = path.cons (tree_path (nb x hn)) (nb_edge x hn)
:= recursion_away _ _ _ _
@[reducible] def rlist : Q → list (α × bool) → list (R × bool)
:= λ s l, plist (path_from_list s l).2
@[simp] lemma rlist_concat (s : Q) (l l' : list (α × bool)) :
rlist s (l' ++ l) = rlist (mk l • s) l' ++ rlist s l := begin
have h : rlist s (l' ++ l) = plist (path_from_list s (l' ++ l)).2, from rfl,
rw [h, pfl_concat],
simp,
rw [plist_concat, plist_wd (pfl_end s l) l'],
end
@[simp] def rmul : Q → list (α × bool) → F := λ s l, mk (rlist s l)
lemma concat_to_mul {l l' : list (R × bool)} :
mk (l++l') = mk l * mk l' := rfl
lemma rlist_singleton {t : Q} {p : α × bool} :
rlist t [p] = plist (path.cons (path.nil t) (edge.intro t p)) := rfl
lemma plist_singleton {s t : Q} {e : edge s t} : plist (path.cons (path.nil s) e)
= from_edge_maybe e := by simp
lemma change_fem : Π {s t t'} {e : edge s t} (h : t = t'),
from_edge_maybe e = from_edge_maybe (change_end h e)
| _ _ _ _ rfl := rfl
lemma plist_tp : Π {x : Q}, plist (tree_path x) = []
:= tree_recursion (by {rw tree_path_root, simp}) begin
intros x hn h,
rw tree_path_away hn,
simp,
split,
rw fem_unfold,
rw dif_pos,
apply or.inl,
use hn,
exact sigma.eq rfl rfl,
assumption,
end
lemma plist_rev_tp : Π {x : Q}, plist (prev $ tree_path x) = []
:= tree_recursion (by {rw tree_path_root, simp}) begin
intros x hn h,
rw tree_path_away hn,
simp,
rw plist_concat,
simp,
split,
assumption,
have p : ↑(rev (nb_edge x hn)) = path.cons (path.nil _) (rev (nb_edge x hn)),
refl,
rw p,
rw plist_singleton,
rw fem_unfold,
rw dif_pos,
apply or.inr,
rw rev_rev,
use hn,
exact sigma.eq rfl rfl,
end
lemma pbnot_inv {β : Type} : Π (p : β × bool), mk [pbnot p] * mk [p] = 1
| (a, b) := inv_mul_self $ mk [(a,b)]
lemma inv_pbnot {β : Type} : Π (p : β × bool), mk [p] * mk [pbnot p] = 1
| (a, b) := mul_inv_self $ mk [(a,b)]
lemma red_smul : ∀ {s l l'}, red.step l l' → rmul s l = rmul s l'
| s _ _ (@red.step.bnot _ L1 L2 a b) := begin
simp,
have h : (mk ((a,b)::(a,!b)::L2) : G) = mk L2,
from quot.sound (@red.step.bnot _ [] L2 a b),
rw h,
suffices g : mk (rlist s ((a,b)::(a,!b)::L2)) = mk (rlist s L2),
by {repeat {rw concat_to_mul}, cc},
have h : (((a,b)::(a,!b)::L2):list(α×bool)) = [(a,b)] ++ [(a,!b)] ++ L2,
from rfl,
rw h,
repeat {rw rlist_concat},
repeat {rw concat_to_mul},
set t := mk L2 • s,
suffices g : mk (rlist (mk [(a,!b)] • t) [(a,b)]) * mk (rlist t [(a,!b)]) = 1,
by {rw g, simp},
repeat {rw rlist_singleton},
repeat {rw plist_singleton},
set e := edge.intro t (a,!b),
have h : from_edge_maybe (edge.intro (mk [(a,!b)] • t) (a,!!b)) = from_edge_maybe (rev e),
apply change_fem,
rw bnot_bnot at h,
rw h,
repeat {rw fem_unfold},
cases (em $ is_in_tree e) with pos neg,
rw [dif_pos, dif_pos],
simp,
assumption,
rwa is_in_tree_rev,
rw [dif_neg, dif_neg, from_edge_rev],
apply pbnot_inv,
assumption,
rwa is_in_tree_rev,
end
instance f_is_group : group F := free_group.group
def f_of_g : G → F := quot.lift (rmul r) (@red_smul r)
def f_of_h : H → F := f_of_g ∘ coe
def h_of_f : F → H := to_group $ λ a, ⟨pmul (to_loop a), by simp⟩
lemma f_of_g.mk (l : list (α × bool)) : f_of_g (mk l) = rmul r l := rfl
lemma f_of_h_mul : ∀ (x : G) (y : H), f_of_g (x*y) = f_of_g x * f_of_g y
| x ⟨y, h⟩ := begin
induction x with l,
induction y with l',
simp,
simp at h,
repeat {rw f_of_g.mk},
simp,
rw h,
simp,
simp,
end
instance f_of_h.is_hom : is_group_hom f_of_h := {map_mul := λ x y, f_of_h_mul x y}
instance h_of_f.is_hom : is_group_hom h_of_f := to_group.is_group_hom
lemma coe_mul {a b : H} : ↑(a*b) = (↑a * ↑b:G) := rfl
lemma pmul_tp_change : Π {s t : Q} {e : edge s t} (h : is_in_dir_tree e),
mk [proj e] * pmul (tree_path s) = pmul (tree_path t)
| s t e ⟨hn, he⟩ := begin
have p : s = (my_closer_nbr t hn).1.1,
rw he,
have q : proj e = proj ((my_closer_nbr t hn).1.2),
rw he,
rw q,
rw p,
suffices g : mk [proj (nb_edge t hn)] * pmul (tree_path (nb t hn))
= pmul (tree_path t),
exact g,
rw tree_path_away hn,
simp,
end
lemma pmul_prev : Π {s t} (p : path s t), pmul (prev p) = (pmul p)⁻¹
| _ _ (path.nil s) := by simp
| s t' (path.cons p (e:edge t _)) := begin
simp,
rw pmul_prev,
simp,
have h : ↑(rev e) = path.cons (path.nil t') (rev e), from rfl,
rw h,
simp,
cases proj e with a b,
refl,
end
lemma h_of_f.from_edge {s t} {e : edge s t} (hn : ¬is_in_tree e) (h : (proj e).2) :
↑(h_of_f (mk [from_edge e hn])) = (pmul (tree_path t))⁻¹ * mk [proj e] *
pmul (tree_path s) := begin
rw from_edge_unfold,
rw dif_pos h,
have p : ∀ x, h_of_f x = to_group (λ a, ⟨pmul (to_loop a), by simp⟩) x,
intro x,
refl,
rw p,
have q : mk [(rmk s t e hn h, tt)] = of (rmk s t e hn h), from rfl,
rw q,
rw to_group.of,
simp,
have p' : to_loop (rmk s t e hn h) = pconcat (path.cons (tree_path s) e) (prev (tree_path t)),
refl,
rw p',
simp,
rw mul_assoc,
simp,
apply pmul_prev,
exact r, -- TODO: where does this goal come from???
end
lemma pbnot_is_inv {β : Type} : Π (p : β × bool), mk [pbnot p] = (mk [p])⁻¹
| (x, b) := rfl
lemma coe_inv {x : H} : (↑x⁻¹ : G) = (↑x)⁻¹ := rfl
lemma h_of_f.from_edge' {s t} {e : edge s t} (hn : ¬is_in_tree e) (h : ¬(proj e).2) :
↑(h_of_f (mk [from_edge e hn])) = (pmul (tree_path t))⁻¹ * mk [proj e] *
pmul (tree_path s) := begin
have p : from_edge e hn = pbnot (from_edge (rev e) (not_in_tree_rev.mpr hn)),
rw from_edge_unfold,
rw from_edge_unfold,
rw [dif_neg, dif_pos],
refl,
assumption,
rw p,
rw pbnot_is_inv,
rw is_group_hom.map_inv h_of_f,
have q : ↥(proj $ rev e).2,
rw rev_ori,
assumption,
rw coe_inv,
rw h_of_f.from_edge,
repeat {rw mul_inv_rev},
repeat {rw mul_assoc},
rw mul_left_inj,
rw inv_inv,
rw mul_right_inj,
rw rev_proj,
rw pbnot_is_inv,
simp,
assumption,
end
lemma g_of_p : Π {s t} {p : path s t}, pmul p
= pmul (tree_path t) * h_of_f (mk $ plist p) * (pmul (tree_path s))⁻¹
| _ _ (path.nil s) := begin
have h : plist (path.nil s) = [], from rfl,
rw h,
have h' : h_of_f (mk []) = 1, from rfl,
rw h',
simp,
end
| s t' (path.cons p (e:edge t _)) := begin
simp,
rw g_of_p,
rw ←mul_assoc,
simp,
have h : mk (from_edge_maybe e ++ plist p) =
mk (from_edge_maybe e) * mk (plist p), from rfl,
rw h,
rw is_mul_hom.map_mul h_of_f,
rw coe_mul,
repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
simp,
cases (em $ is_in_tree e) with pos neg,
rw [fem_unfold, dif_pos pos],
have h' : h_of_f (mk []) = 1, from rfl,
rw h',
simp,
cases pos with a b,
exact pmul_tp_change a,
rw ←pmul_tp_change b,
rw ←mul_assoc,
simp,
exact inv_pbnot _,
rw [fem_unfold, dif_neg neg],
cases (em (proj e).2) with x y,
rw h_of_f.from_edge neg x,
repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
simp,
rw h_of_f.from_edge' neg y,
repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
simp,
end
instance f_of_f_is_hom : is_group_hom (f_of_h ∘ h_of_f) := is_group_hom.comp _ _
lemma f_of_f (f : F) : f_of_h (h_of_f f) = f := begin
suffices g : f_of_h (h_of_f f) = to_group of f,
rw g,
exact to_group.of_eq _,
apply to_group.unique (f_of_h ∘ h_of_f),
intro x,
simp,
have p : h_of_f (of x) = ⟨pmul (to_loop x), by simp⟩, from to_group.of,
rw p,
have p : f_of_h ⟨pmul (to_loop x), by simp⟩ = f_of_g (pmul (to_loop x)), from rfl,
rw [p, pmul_list, f_of_g.mk],
have p : rmul r (list_from_path (to_loop x)) = mk (plist (path_from_list r (list_from_path (to_loop x))).2),
refl,
rw [p, path_from_path],
simp,
have p : to_loop x = pconcat (path.cons (tree_path (to_s x)) (to_edge x))
(prev $ tree_path (to_t x)),
refl,
rw [p, plist_concat, plist_rev_tp],
simp,
rw plist_tp,
simp,
rw [fem_unfold, dif_neg, r_from_r],
refl,
exact r,
end
lemma h_of_h : ∀ h : H, h_of_f (f_of_h h) = h
| ⟨x, hh⟩ := begin
induction x with l,
have p : f_of_h = f_of_g ∘ coe, from rfl,
rw p,
rw subtype.ext,
simp,
rw f_of_g.mk,
have h : rmul r l = mk (plist (path_from_list r l).2),
refl,
rw h,
have q : mk l = mk (list_from_path (path_from_list r l).2),
rw list_from_list r l,
rw q,
set pp := (path_from_list r l).2 with hpp,
rw ←pmul_list,
rw g_of_p,
have h' : pmul (tree_path (path_from_list r l).1) = pmul (tree_path $ mk l • r),
rw pfl_end r l,
rw h',
have hh' : mk l • r = r, from hh,
rw hh',
repeat {rw tree_path_root},
simp,
refl,
exact r,
simp, -- TODO: ???
end
def isom : stabilizer G r ≃* free_group R
:= ⟨f_of_h, h_of_f, h_of_h, f_of_f, is_mul_hom.map_mul _⟩
@[simp] def rhs_of_lhs : Q × α ⊕ unit → Q ⊕ R
| (sum.inl (s, a)) := dite (is_in_tree ⟨s, (a,tt)⟩)
(λ _, sum.inl $ ite (is_in_dir_tree ⟨s, (a,tt)⟩) (of a • s) s)
(λ hn, sum.inr $ (from_edge ⟨s, (a,tt)⟩ hn).1)
| (sum.inr ()) := sum.inl r
@[simp] def lhs_of_rhs : Q ⊕ R → Q × α ⊕ unit
| (sum.inl s) := dite (s = r) (λ _, sum.inr ())
(λ hn, sum.inl (ite (proj $ nb_edge s hn).2 (nb s hn) s, (proj $ nb_edge s hn).1))
| (sum.inr ⟨⟨_, _, s, (a,b)⟩, _⟩) := sum.inl (s, a)
def lhs_of_lhs : ∀ x, lhs_of_rhs (rhs_of_lhs x) = x
| (sum.inl (s,a)) := dite (is_in_tree ⟨s, (a,tt)⟩)
begin
intro pos,
simp,
rw dif_pos pos,
simp,
set e := edge.intro s (a,tt),
cases (em $ is_in_dir_tree e) with vr rv,
rw if_pos vr,
cases vr with hn he,
have p : mk [(a,tt)] = of a, from rfl,
rw p at hn,
rw dif_neg hn,
rw sum.inl.inj_iff,
set t := (my_closer_nbr (of a • s) hn).val,
have hne : nb_edge (of a • s) hn_1 = t.2, from rfl,
repeat {rw hne},
have hnb : nb (of a • s) hn_1 = t.1, from rfl,
have hv : t = ⟨s, e⟩, from he,
have hp : proj t.2 = proj (⟨s, e⟩:inbhd (of a • s)).2,
exact congr_arg (λ x : inbhd (of a • s), proj x.2) hv,
repeat {rw hp},
simp,
rw hnb,
rw hv,
rw if_neg rv,
have h : is_in_dir_tree (rev e),
cases pos with le ri,
exact false.elim (rv le),
assumption,
cases h with hn he,
rw dif_neg hn,
rw sum.inl.inj_iff,
set t := (my_closer_nbr s hn).val,
have hne : nb_edge s hn = t.2, from rfl,
repeat {rw hne},
have hnb : nb s hn = t.1, from rfl,
have hv : t = ⟨of a • s, rev e⟩, from he,
have hp : proj t.2 = proj (⟨of a • s, rev e⟩ : inbhd s).2,
exact congr_arg (λ x : inbhd s, proj x.2) hv,
repeat {rw hp},
simp,
end begin
intro neg,
simp,
rw dif_neg neg,
rw from_edge_unfold,
rw dif_pos,
swap,
simp,
simp,
have h : rmk s (mk [(a,tt)] • s) ⟨s, (a,tt)⟩ neg (by simp) = ⟨⟨s, of a • s, s, (a,tt)⟩, neg, (by simp)⟩,
refl,
rw h,
refl,
end
| (sum.inr ()) := by simp
def end_is_end : Π {s t} (e : edge s t), mk [proj e] • s = t
| _ _ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
def change_is_in_dir_tree : Π {s t t'} {e : edge s t}
(h : t = t'), is_in_dir_tree (change_end h e) ↔ is_in_dir_tree e
| _ _ _ _ rfl := by refl
def change_is_in_tree : Π {s t t'} {e : edge s t}
(h : t = t'), is_in_tree (change_end h e) ↔ is_in_tree e
| _ _ _ _ rfl := by refl
lemma nb.unique : Π {s s'} {h : s ≠ r} {h' : s' ≠ r} (he : s = s'), nb s h = nb s' h'
| _ _ _ _ rfl := rfl
def not_in_2_cycle (s) : Prop
:= ∀ (h : s ≠ r) (h' : nb s h ≠ r), s ≠ nb (nb s h) h'
lemma no_2_cycle : ∀ (s) (h : s ≠ r) (h' : nb s h ≠ r), s ≠ nb (nb s h) h'
:= @tree_recursion not_in_2_cycle (λ h, false.elim (h rfl)) begin
intros t hn f hn' h' he,
rw he at hn,
apply f h' hn,
apply nb.unique,
cc,
end
def rhs_of_rhs : ∀ x, rhs_of_lhs (lhs_of_rhs x) = x
| (sum.inl s) := dite (s = r) (λ h, eq.rec (by simp) h.symm) begin
intro hn,
simp,
rw dif_neg hn,
cases (em $ (proj (nb_edge s hn)).2) with le ri,
rw if_pos le,
simp,
have h : ((proj $ nb_edge s hn).1, tt) = proj (nb_edge s hn),
ext,
refl,
simp,
symmetry,
assumption,
rw h,
set t := proj (nb_edge s hn),
have p : mk [t] • (nb s hn) = s,
exact end_is_end _,
have he : edge.intro (nb s hn) t = change_end p.symm (nb_edge s hn),
apply edge_ext,
simp,
have hd : is_in_dir_tree (edge.intro (nb s hn) t),
rw he,
rw change_is_in_dir_tree,
use hn,
exact sigma.eq rfl rfl,
have ht : is_in_tree (edge.intro (nb s hn) t),
exact or.inl hd,
rw dif_pos ht,
rw sum.inl.inj_iff,
rw if_pos hd,
rw ←h at p,
exact p,
rw if_neg ri,
simp,
have hp : ((proj $ nb_edge s hn).1, tt) = proj (rev $ nb_edge s hn),
rw rev_proj,
ext,
have ha : ∀ x, (pbnot x).1 = x.1,
intro x,
cases x with a b,
refl,
rw ha,
simp,
symmetry,
have ha : ∀ x, (pbnot x).2 = !x.2,
intro x,
cases x with a b,
refl,
rw ha,
simp,
exact bool_eq_false ri,
have hm : mk [proj $ rev $ nb_edge s hn] • s = nb s hn,
exact end_is_end _,
rw hp,
rw dif_pos,
rw sum.inl.inj_iff,
rw if_neg,
intro h,
cases h with hn' hh,
have hs : nb (mk [proj $ rev $ nb_edge s hn] • s) hn' = s,
exact congr_arg _ hh,
rw nb.unique hm at hs,
swap,
rw ←hm,
assumption,
apply no_2_cycle s,
exact hs.symm,
have he : edge.intro s (proj $ rev $ nb_edge s hn) = change_end hm.symm (rev $ nb_edge s hn),
apply edge_ext,
simp,
rw he,
rw change_is_in_tree,
rw is_in_tree_rev,
apply or.inl,
use hn,
exact sigma.eq rfl rfl,
end
| (sum.inr ⟨⟨_, _, s, (a, b)⟩, h, hh⟩) := begin
simp,
have hh' : b = tt, from hh,
rw hh' at h,
have h' : ¬is_in_tree ⟨s, (a, tt)⟩, from h,
rw dif_neg h',
rw sum.inr.inj_iff,
rw from_edge_unfold,
rw dif_pos,
swap,
simp,
rw subtype.ext,
simp,
rw hh',
refl,
end
def index_equiv : Q × α ⊕ unit ≃ Q ⊕ R
:= ⟨rhs_of_lhs, lhs_of_rhs, lhs_of_lhs, rhs_of_rhs⟩
end |
3ff725d6fb5c5f8bb4088f59b69177dfeeaa58c8 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/print.lean | 95d491db708774740615c43c68d05f1b62b1d29e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 254 | lean | import data.num logic data.prod data.nat data.int algebra.category.basic
open num prod int nat category
print instances inhabited
print raw 3+2
print options
print coercions Category
print "-----------"
print coercions
print "-----------"
print classes
|
614ee15874217a31c615bb1a404cfce8d9ad3a9b | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/analysis/convex/integral.lean | cabfade17b69ca3ca7412cadf588f8e522c487d1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,796 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.convex.function
import measure_theory.integral.set_integral
/-!
# Jensen's inequality for integrals
In this file we prove four theorems:
* `convex.smul_integral_mem`: if `μ` is a non-zero finite measure on `α`, `s` is a convex closed set
in `E`, and `f` is an integrable function sending `μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the average value
of `f` belongs to `s`: `(μ univ).to_real⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s`. See also `convex.center_mass_mem`
for a finite sum version of this lemma.
* `convex.integral_mem`: if `μ` is a probability measure on `α`, `s` is a convex closed set in `E`,
and `f` is an integrable function sending `μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the expected value of `f`
belongs to `s`: `∫ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s`. See also `convex.sum_mem` for a finite sum version of this
lemma.
* `convex_on.map_smul_integral_le`: Convex Jensen's inequality: If a function `g : E → ℝ` is convex
and continuous on a convex closed set `s`, `μ` is a finite non-zero measure on `α`, and
`f : α → E` is a function sending `μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the value of `g` at the average
value of `f` is less than or equal to the average value of `g ∘ f` provided that both `f` and
`g ∘ f` are integrable. See also `convex_on.map_sum_le` for a finite sum version of this lemma.
* `convex_on.map_integral_le`: Convex Jensen's inequality: If a function `g : E → ℝ` is convex and
continuous on a convex closed set `s`, `μ` is a probability measure on `α`, and `f : α → E` is a
function sending `μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the value of `g` at the expected value of `f` is
less than or equal to the expected value of `g ∘ f` provided that both `f` and `g ∘ f` are
integrable. See also `convex_on.map_sum_le` for a finite sum version of this lemma.
## Tags
convex, integral, center mass, Jensen's inequality
-/
open measure_theory set filter
open_locale topological_space big_operators
variables {α E : Type*} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
[normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [complete_space E]
[topological_space.second_countable_topology E] [measurable_space E] [borel_space E]
private lemma convex.smul_integral_mem_of_measurable
[is_finite_measure μ] {s : set E} (hs : convex ℝ s) (hsc : is_closed s)
(hμ : μ ≠ 0) {f : α → E} (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ) (hfm : measurable f) :
(μ univ).to_real⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s :=
begin
unfreezingI { rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|⟨y₀, h₀⟩ },
{ refine (hμ _).elim, simpa using hfs },
rw ← hsc.closure_eq at hfs,
have hc : integrable (λ _, y₀) μ := integrable_const _,
set F : ℕ → simple_func α E := simple_func.approx_on f hfm s y₀ h₀,
have : tendsto (λ n, (F n).integral μ) at_top (𝓝 $ ∫ x, f x ∂μ),
{ simp only [simple_func.integral_eq_integral _
(simple_func.integrable_approx_on hfm hfi h₀ hc _)],
exact tendsto_integral_of_L1 _ hfi
(eventually_of_forall $ simple_func.integrable_approx_on hfm hfi h₀ hc)
(simple_func.tendsto_approx_on_L1_nnnorm hfm h₀ hfs (hfi.sub hc).2) },
refine hsc.mem_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.smul this) (eventually_of_forall $ λ n, _),
have : ∑ y in (F n).range, (μ ((F n) ⁻¹' {y})).to_real = (μ univ).to_real,
by rw [← (F n).sum_range_measure_preimage_singleton, @ennreal.to_real_sum _ _
(λ y, μ ((F n) ⁻¹' {y})) (λ _ _, (measure_ne_top _ _))],
rw [← this, simple_func.integral],
refine hs.center_mass_mem (λ _ _, ennreal.to_real_nonneg) _ _,
{ rw [this, ennreal.to_real_pos_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero, ne.def, measure.measure_univ_eq_zero],
exact ⟨hμ, measure_ne_top _ _⟩ },
{ simp only [simple_func.mem_range],
rintros _ ⟨x, rfl⟩,
exact simple_func.approx_on_mem hfm h₀ n x }
end
/-- If `μ` is a non-zero finite measure on `α`, `s` is a convex closed set in `E`, and `f` is an
integrable function sending `μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the average value of `f` belongs to `s`:
`(μ univ).to_real⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s`. See also `convex.center_mass_mem` for a finite sum version
of this lemma. -/
lemma convex.smul_integral_mem
[is_finite_measure μ] {s : set E} (hs : convex ℝ s) (hsc : is_closed s)
(hμ : μ ≠ 0) {f : α → E} (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
(μ univ).to_real⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s :=
begin
have : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, hfi.ae_measurable.mk f x ∈ s,
{ filter_upwards [hfs, hfi.ae_measurable.ae_eq_mk],
assume a ha h,
rwa ← h },
convert convex.smul_integral_mem_of_measurable hs hsc hμ this
(hfi.congr hfi.ae_measurable.ae_eq_mk) (hfi.ae_measurable.measurable_mk) using 2,
apply integral_congr_ae,
exact hfi.ae_measurable.ae_eq_mk
end
/-- If `μ` is a probability measure on `α`, `s` is a convex closed set in `E`, and `f` is an
integrable function sending `μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the expected value of `f` belongs to `s`:
`∫ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s`. See also `convex.sum_mem` for a finite sum version of this lemma. -/
lemma convex.integral_mem [is_probability_measure μ] {s : set E} (hs : convex ℝ s)
(hsc : is_closed s) {f : α → E} (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s :=
by simpa [measure_univ] using hs.smul_integral_mem hsc (is_probability_measure.ne_zero μ) hf hfi
/-- Jensen's inequality: if a function `g : E → ℝ` is convex and continuous on a convex closed set
`s`, `μ` is a finite non-zero measure on `α`, and `f : α → E` is a function sending `μ`-a.e. points
to `s`, then the value of `g` at the average value of `f` is less than or equal to the average value
of `g ∘ f` provided that both `f` and `g ∘ f` are integrable. See also `convex.map_center_mass_le`
for a finite sum version of this lemma. -/
lemma convex_on.map_smul_integral_le [is_finite_measure μ] {s : set E} {g : E → ℝ}
(hg : convex_on ℝ s g) (hgc : continuous_on g s) (hsc : is_closed s) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) {f : α → E}
(hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ) (hgi : integrable (g ∘ f) μ) :
g ((μ univ).to_real⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ) ≤ (μ univ).to_real⁻¹ • ∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ :=
begin
set t := {p : E × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ g p.1 ≤ p.2},
have ht_conv : convex ℝ t := hg.convex_epigraph,
have ht_closed : is_closed t :=
(hsc.preimage continuous_fst).is_closed_le (hgc.comp continuous_on_fst (subset.refl _))
continuous_on_snd,
have ht_mem : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, (f x, g (f x)) ∈ t := hfs.mono (λ x hx, ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩),
simpa [integral_pair hfi hgi]
using (ht_conv.smul_integral_mem ht_closed hμ ht_mem (hfi.prod_mk hgi)).2
end
/-- Convex **Jensen's inequality**: if a function `g : E → ℝ` is convex and continuous on a convex
closed set `s`, `μ` is a probability measure on `α`, and `f : α → E` is a function sending `μ`-a.e.
points to `s`, then the value of `g` at the expected value of `f` is less than or equal to the
expected value of `g ∘ f` provided that both `f` and `g ∘ f` are integrable. See also
`convex_on.map_center_mass_le` for a finite sum version of this lemma. -/
lemma convex_on.map_integral_le [is_probability_measure μ] {s : set E} {g : E → ℝ}
(hg : convex_on ℝ s g) (hgc : continuous_on g s) (hsc : is_closed s) {f : α → E}
(hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ) (hgi : integrable (g ∘ f) μ) :
g (∫ x, f x ∂μ) ≤ ∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ :=
by simpa [measure_univ]
using hg.map_smul_integral_le hgc hsc (is_probability_measure.ne_zero μ) hfs hfi hgi
|
19443366a8aad7187dbc6c16fe02488a235453d0 | 432d948a4d3d242fdfb44b81c9e1b1baacd58617 | /src/data/list/rotate.lean | deca75582c79c683d7a180e483bf8f9a14232e00 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JLimperg/aesop3 | 306cc6570c556568897ed2e508c8869667252e8a | a4a116f650cc7403428e72bd2e2c4cda300fe03f | refs/heads/master | 1,682,884,916,368 | 1,620,320,033,000 | 1,620,320,033,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,591 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import data.list.basic
universes u
variables {α : Type u}
open nat
namespace list
lemma rotate_mod (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (n % l.length) = l.rotate n :=
by simp [rotate]
@[simp] lemma rotate_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : list α).rotate n = [] := by cases n; simp [rotate]
@[simp] lemma rotate_zero (l : list α) : l.rotate 0 = l := by simp [rotate]
@[simp] lemma rotate'_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : list α).rotate' n = [] := by cases n; refl
@[simp] lemma rotate'_zero (l : list α) : l.rotate' 0 = l := by cases l; refl
lemma rotate'_cons_succ (l : list α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : list α).rotate' n.succ = (l ++ [a]).rotate' n := by simp [rotate']
@[simp] lemma length_rotate' : ∀ (l : list α) (n : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).length = l.length
| [] n := rfl
| (a::l) 0 := rfl
| (a::l) (n+1) := by rw [list.rotate', length_rotate' (l ++ [a]) n]; simp
lemma rotate'_eq_take_append_drop : ∀ {l : list α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l.length →
l.rotate' n = l.drop n ++ l.take n
| [] n h := by simp [drop_append_of_le_length h]
| l 0 h := by simp [take_append_of_le_length h]
| (a::l) (n+1) h :=
have hnl : n ≤ l.length, from le_of_succ_le_succ h,
have hnl' : n ≤ (l ++ [a]).length,
by rw [length_append, length_cons, list.length, zero_add];
exact (le_of_succ_le h),
by rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_eq_take_append_drop hnl', drop, take,
drop_append_of_le_length hnl, take_append_of_le_length hnl];
simp
lemma rotate'_rotate' : ∀ (l : list α) (n m : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).rotate' m = l.rotate' (n + m)
| (a::l) 0 m := by simp
| [] n m := by simp
| (a::l) (n+1) m := by rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_rotate', add_right_comm, rotate'_cons_succ]
@[simp] lemma rotate'_length (l : list α) : rotate' l l.length = l :=
by rw rotate'_eq_take_append_drop (le_refl _); simp
@[simp] lemma rotate'_length_mul (l : list α) : ∀ n : ℕ, l.rotate' (l.length * n) = l
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) :=
calc l.rotate' (l.length * (n + 1)) =
(l.rotate' (l.length * n)).rotate' (l.rotate' (l.length * n)).length :
by simp [-rotate'_length, nat.mul_succ, rotate'_rotate']
... = l : by rw [rotate'_length, rotate'_length_mul]
lemma rotate'_mod (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate' (n % l.length) = l.rotate' n :=
calc l.rotate' (n % l.length) = (l.rotate' (n % l.length)).rotate'
((l.rotate' (n % l.length)).length * (n / l.length)) : by rw rotate'_length_mul
... = l.rotate' n : by rw [rotate'_rotate', length_rotate', nat.mod_add_div]
lemma rotate_eq_rotate' (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n = l.rotate' n :=
if h : l.length = 0 then by simp [length_eq_zero, *] at *
else by
rw [← rotate'_mod, rotate'_eq_take_append_drop (le_of_lt (nat.mod_lt _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))];
simp [rotate]
lemma rotate_cons_succ (l : list α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : list α).rotate n.succ = (l ++ [a]).rotate n :=
by rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_cons_succ]
@[simp] lemma mem_rotate : ∀ {l : list α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}, a ∈ l.rotate n ↔ a ∈ l
| [] _ n := by simp
| (a::l) _ 0 := by simp
| (a::l) _ (n+1) := by simp [rotate_cons_succ, mem_rotate, or.comm]
@[simp] lemma length_rotate (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).length = l.length :=
by rw [rotate_eq_rotate', length_rotate']
lemma rotate_eq_take_append_drop {l : list α} {n : ℕ} : n ≤ l.length →
l.rotate n = l.drop n ++ l.take n :=
by rw rotate_eq_rotate'; exact rotate'_eq_take_append_drop
lemma rotate_rotate (l : list α) (n m : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).rotate m = l.rotate (n + m) :=
by rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_rotate']
@[simp] lemma rotate_length (l : list α) : rotate l l.length = l :=
by rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length]
@[simp] lemma rotate_length_mul (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (l.length * n) = l :=
by rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length_mul]
lemma prod_rotate_eq_one_of_prod_eq_one [group α] : ∀ {l : list α} (hl : l.prod = 1) (n : ℕ),
(l.rotate n).prod = 1
| [] _ _ := by simp
| (a::l) hl n :=
have n % list.length (a :: l) ≤ list.length (a :: l), from le_of_lt (nat.mod_lt _ dec_trivial),
by rw ← list.take_append_drop (n % list.length (a :: l)) (a :: l) at hl;
rw [← rotate_mod, rotate_eq_take_append_drop this, list.prod_append, mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq,
← one_mul (list.prod _)⁻¹, ← hl, list.prod_append, mul_assoc, mul_inv_self, mul_one]
end list
|
7c7d4f3fa3961fbd04b08631f8d82e8b1f1c472b | 947b78d97130d56365ae2ec264df196ce769371a | /stage0/src/Lean/Scopes.lean | 59db0a88c0ca3d6c72afdecd0c27e57ac4351599 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shyamalschandra/lean4 | 27044812be8698f0c79147615b1d5090b9f4b037 | 6e7a883b21eaf62831e8111b251dc9b18f40e604 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,417,126,371 | 1,601,859,995,000 | 1,601,860,020,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,707 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Environment
namespace Lean
namespace TODELETE
/- Scope management
TODO: delete after we delete parser implemented in C++.
We have decided to store scope information at ElabState
-/
structure ScopeManagerState :=
(allNamespaces : NameSet := {})
/- Stack of namespaces for each each open namespace and section -/
(namespaces : List Name := [])
/- Stack of namespace/section headers -/
(headers : List Name := [])
(isNamespace : List Bool := [])
namespace ScopeManagerState
instance : Inhabited ScopeManagerState := ⟨{}⟩
def saveNamespace (s : ScopeManagerState) (n : Name) : ScopeManagerState :=
{ s with allNamespaces := s.allNamespaces.insert n }
end ScopeManagerState
def regScopeManagerExtension : IO (SimplePersistentEnvExtension Name ScopeManagerState) :=
registerSimplePersistentEnvExtension {
name := `scopes,
addImportedFn := fun as => mkStateFromImportedEntries ScopeManagerState.saveNamespace {} as,
addEntryFn := fun s n => { s with allNamespaces := s.allNamespaces.insert n },
}
@[init regScopeManagerExtension]
constant scopeManagerExt : SimplePersistentEnvExtension Name ScopeManagerState := arbitrary _
@[export lean_get_namespaces]
def getNamespaces (env : Environment) : List Name :=
(scopeManagerExt.getState env).namespaces
def getNamespaceSet (env : Environment) : NameSet :=
(scopeManagerExt.getState env).allNamespaces
@[export lean_is_namespace]
def isNamespace (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Bool :=
(getNamespaceSet env).contains n
@[export lean_in_section]
def inSection (env : Environment) : Bool :=
match (scopeManagerExt.getState env).isNamespace with
| (b::_) => !b
| _ => false
@[export lean_has_open_scopes]
def hasOpenScopes (env : Environment) : Bool :=
!(getNamespaces env).isEmpty
@[export lean_get_namespace]
def getNamespace (env : Environment) : Name :=
match getNamespaces env with
| (n::_) => n
| _ => Name.anonymous
@[export lean_get_scope_header]
def getScopeHeader (env : Environment) : Name :=
match (scopeManagerExt.getState env).headers with
| (n::_) => n
| _ => Name.anonymous
@[export lean_to_valid_namespace]
def toValidNamespace (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Option Name :=
let s := scopeManagerExt.getState env;
if s.allNamespaces.contains n then some n
else s.namespaces.foldl
(fun r ns => match r with
| some _ => r
| none =>
let c := ns ++ n;
if s.allNamespaces.contains c then some c else none)
none
def registerNamespaceAux (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Environment :=
if (getNamespaceSet env).contains n then env else scopeManagerExt.addEntry env n
@[export lean_register_namespace]
def registerNamespace : Environment → Name → Environment
| env, n@(Name.str p _ _) => registerNamespace (registerNamespaceAux env n) p
| env, _ => env
def pushScopeCore (env : Environment) (header : Name) (isNamespace : Bool) : Environment :=
let ns := getNamespace env;
let newNs := if isNamespace then ns ++ header else ns;
let env := registerNamespaceAux env newNs;
let env := scopeManagerExt.modifyState env $ fun s =>
{ s with
headers := header :: s.headers,
namespaces := newNs :: s.namespaces,
isNamespace := isNamespace :: s.isNamespace };
env
def popScopeCore (env : Environment) : Environment :=
if (getNamespaces env).isEmpty then env
else scopeManagerExt.modifyState env $ fun s =>
{ s with
headers := s.headers.tail!,
namespaces := s.namespaces.tail!,
isNamespace := s.isNamespace.tail! }
end TODELETE
end Lean
|
5080dc54f7ff37e3787d02dead772b8007e79019 | 4b846d8dabdc64e7ea03552bad8f7fa74763fc67 | /library/init/meta/simp_tactic.lean | f654fd0f691d1211fc445cf7612cd36f5ce8b190 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pacchiano/lean | 9324b33f3ac3b5c5647285160f9f6ea8d0d767dc | fdadada3a970377a6df8afcd629a6f2eab6e84e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,357,380,399 | 1,489,870,101,000 | 1,489,870,101,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,208 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.meta.tactic init.meta.attribute init.meta.constructor_tactic
import init.meta.relation_tactics init.meta.occurrences init.meta.quote
open tactic
meta constant simp_lemmas : Type
meta constant simp_lemmas.mk : simp_lemmas
meta constant simp_lemmas.join : simp_lemmas → simp_lemmas → simp_lemmas
meta constant simp_lemmas.erase : simp_lemmas → list name → simp_lemmas
meta constant simp_lemmas.mk_default_core : transparency → tactic simp_lemmas
meta constant simp_lemmas.add_core : transparency → simp_lemmas → expr → tactic simp_lemmas
meta constant simp_lemmas.add_simp_core : transparency → simp_lemmas → name → tactic simp_lemmas
meta constant simp_lemmas.add_congr_core : transparency → simp_lemmas → name → tactic simp_lemmas
meta def simp_lemmas.mk_default : tactic simp_lemmas :=
simp_lemmas.mk_default_core reducible
meta def simp_lemmas.add : simp_lemmas → expr → tactic simp_lemmas :=
simp_lemmas.add_core reducible
meta def simp_lemmas.add_simp : simp_lemmas → name → tactic simp_lemmas :=
simp_lemmas.add_simp_core reducible
meta def simp_lemmas.add_congr : simp_lemmas → name → tactic simp_lemmas :=
simp_lemmas.add_congr_core reducible
meta def simp_lemmas.append : simp_lemmas → list expr → tactic simp_lemmas
| sls [] := return sls
| sls (l::ls) := do
new_sls ← simp_lemmas.add sls l,
simp_lemmas.append new_sls ls
/- (simp_lemmas.rewrite_core m s prove R e) apply a simplification lemma from 's'
- 'prove' is used to discharge proof obligations.
- 'R' is the equivalence relation being used (e.g., 'eq', 'iff')
- 'e' is the expression to be "simplified"
Result (new_e, pr) is the new expression 'new_e' and a proof (pr : e R new_e) -/
meta constant simp_lemmas.rewrite_core : transparency → simp_lemmas → tactic unit → name → expr → tactic (expr × expr)
meta def simp_lemmas.rewrite : simp_lemmas → tactic unit → name → expr → tactic (expr × expr) :=
simp_lemmas.rewrite_core reducible
/- (simp_lemmas.drewrite s e) tries to rewrite 'e' using only refl lemmas in 's' -/
meta constant simp_lemmas.drewrite_core : transparency → simp_lemmas → expr → tactic expr
meta def simp_lemmas.drewrite : simp_lemmas → expr → tactic expr :=
simp_lemmas.drewrite_core reducible
/- (Definitional) Simplify the given expression using *only* reflexivity equality lemmas from the given set of lemmas.
The resulting expression is definitionally equal to the input. -/
meta constant simp_lemmas.dsimplify_core (max_steps : nat) (visit_instances : bool) : simp_lemmas → expr → tactic expr
meta constant is_valid_simp_lemma_cnst : transparency → name → tactic bool
meta constant is_valid_simp_lemma : transparency → expr → tactic bool
def default_max_steps := 10000000
meta def simp_lemmas.dsimplify : simp_lemmas → expr → tactic expr :=
simp_lemmas.dsimplify_core default_max_steps ff
meta constant simp_lemmas.pp : simp_lemmas → tactic format
namespace tactic
/- (get_eqn_lemmas_for deps d) returns the automatically generated equational lemmas for definition d.
If deps is tt, then lemmas for automatically generated auxiliary declarations used to define d are also included. -/
meta constant get_eqn_lemmas_for : bool → name → tactic (list name)
meta constant dsimplify_core
/- The user state type. -/
{α : Type}
/- Initial user data -/
(a : α)
(max_steps : nat)
/- If visit_instances = ff, then instance implicit arguments are not visited, but
tactic will canonize them. -/
(visit_instances : bool)
/- (pre a e) is invoked before visiting the children of subterm 'e',
if it succeeds the result (new_a, new_e, flag) where
- 'new_a' is the new value for the user data
- 'new_e' is a new expression that must be definitionally equal to 'e',
- 'flag' if tt 'new_e' children should be visited, and 'post' invoked. -/
(pre : α → expr → tactic (α × expr × bool))
/- (post a e) is invoked after visiting the children of subterm 'e',
The output is similar to (pre a e), but the 'flag' indicates whether
the new expression should be revisited or not. -/
(post : α → expr → tactic (α × expr × bool))
: expr → tactic (α × expr)
meta def dsimplify
(pre : expr → tactic (expr × bool))
(post : expr → tactic (expr × bool))
: expr → tactic expr :=
λ e, do (a, new_e) ← dsimplify_core () default_max_steps ff
(λ u e, do r ← pre e, return (u, r))
(λ u e, do r ← post e, return (u, r)) e,
return new_e
meta constant dunfold_expr_core : transparency → expr → tactic expr
meta def dunfold_expr : expr → tactic expr :=
dunfold_expr_core reducible
meta constant unfold_projection_core : transparency → expr → tactic expr
meta def unfold_projection : expr → tactic expr :=
unfold_projection_core reducible
meta def dunfold_occs_core (m : transparency) (max_steps : nat) (occs : occurrences) (cs : list name) (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
let unfold (c : nat) (e : expr) : tactic (nat × expr × bool) := do
guard (cs^.any e^.is_app_of),
new_e ← dunfold_expr_core m e,
if occs^.contains c
then return (c+1, new_e, tt)
else return (c+1, e, tt)
in do (c, new_e) ← dsimplify_core 1 max_steps tt unfold (λ c e, failed) e,
return new_e
meta def dunfold_core (m : transparency) (max_steps : nat) (cs : list name) (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
let unfold (u : unit) (e : expr) : tactic (unit × expr × bool) := do
guard (cs^.any e^.is_app_of),
new_e ← dunfold_expr_core m e,
return (u, new_e, tt)
in do (c, new_e) ← dsimplify_core () max_steps tt (λ c e, failed) unfold e,
return new_e
meta def dunfold : list name → tactic unit :=
λ cs, target >>= dunfold_core reducible default_max_steps cs >>= change
meta def dunfold_occs_of (occs : list nat) (c : name) : tactic unit :=
target >>= dunfold_occs_core reducible default_max_steps (occurrences.pos occs) [c] >>= change
meta def dunfold_core_at (occs : occurrences) (cs : list name) (h : expr) : tactic unit :=
do num_reverted ← revert h,
(expr.pi n bi d b : expr) ← target,
new_d ← dunfold_occs_core reducible default_max_steps occs cs d,
change $ expr.pi n bi new_d b,
intron num_reverted
meta def dunfold_at (cs : list name) (h : expr) : tactic unit :=
do num_reverted ← revert h,
(expr.pi n bi d b : expr) ← target,
new_d ← dunfold_core reducible default_max_steps cs d,
change $ expr.pi n bi new_d b,
intron num_reverted
structure delta_config :=
(max_steps := default_max_steps)
(visit_instances := tt)
private meta def is_delta_target (e : expr) (cs : list name) : bool :=
cs^.any (λ c,
if e^.is_app_of c then tt /- Exact match -/
else let f := e^.get_app_fn in
/- f is an auxiliary constant generated when compiling c -/
f^.is_constant && f^.const_name^.is_internal && (f^.const_name^.get_prefix = c))
/- Delta reduce the given constant names -/
meta def delta_core (cfg : delta_config) (cs : list name) (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
let unfold (u : unit) (e : expr) : tactic (unit × expr × bool) := do
guard (is_delta_target e cs),
(expr.const f_name f_lvls) ← return e^.get_app_fn,
env ← get_env,
decl ← env^.get f_name,
new_f ← decl^.instantiate_value_univ_params f_lvls,
new_e ← head_beta (expr.mk_app new_f e^.get_app_args),
return (u, new_e, tt)
in do (c, new_e) ← dsimplify_core () cfg^.max_steps cfg^.visit_instances (λ c e, failed) unfold e,
return new_e
meta def delta (cs : list name) : tactic unit :=
target >>= delta_core {} cs >>= change
meta def delta_at (cs : list name) (h : expr) : tactic unit :=
do num_reverted ← revert h,
(expr.pi n bi d b : expr) ← target,
new_d ← delta_core {} cs d,
change $ expr.pi n bi new_d b,
intron num_reverted
structure simp_config :=
(max_steps : nat := default_max_steps)
(contextual : bool := ff)
(lift_eq : bool := tt)
(canonize_instances : bool := tt)
(canonize_proofs : bool := ff)
(use_axioms : bool := tt)
(zeta : bool := tt)
meta constant simplify_core
(c : simp_config)
(s : simp_lemmas)
(r : name) :
expr → tactic (expr × expr)
meta constant ext_simplify_core
/- The user state type. -/
{α : Type}
/- Initial user data -/
(a : α)
(c : simp_config)
/- Congruence and simplification lemmas.
Remark: the simplification lemmas at not applied automatically like in the simplify_core tactic.
the caller must use them at pre/post. -/
(s : simp_lemmas)
/- Tactic for dischaging hypothesis in conditional rewriting rules.
The argument 'α' is the current user state. -/
(prove : α → tactic α)
/- (pre a S r s p e) is invoked before visiting the children of subterm 'e',
'r' is the simplification relation being used, 's' is the updated set of lemmas if 'contextual' is tt,
'p' is the "parent" expression (if there is one).
if it succeeds the result is (new_a, new_e, new_pr, flag) where
- 'new_a' is the new value for the user data
- 'new_e' is a new expression s.t. 'e r new_e'
- 'new_pr' is a proof for 'e r new_e', If it is none, the proof is assumed to be by reflexivity
- 'flag' if tt 'new_e' children should be visited, and 'post' invoked. -/
(pre : α → simp_lemmas → name → option expr → expr → tactic (α × expr × option expr × bool))
/- (post a r s p e) is invoked after visiting the children of subterm 'e',
The output is similar to (pre a r s p e), but the 'flag' indicates whether
the new expression should be revisited or not. -/
(post : α → simp_lemmas → name → option expr → expr → tactic (α × expr × option expr × bool))
/- simplification relation -/
(r : name) :
expr → tactic (α × expr × expr)
meta def simplify (S : simp_lemmas) (e : expr) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
do e_type ← infer_type e >>= whnf,
simplify_core cfg S `eq e
meta def replace_target (new_target : expr) (pr : expr) : tactic unit :=
do assert `htarget new_target, swap,
ht ← get_local `htarget,
mk_eq_mpr pr ht >>= exact
meta def simplify_goal (S : simp_lemmas) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target,
(new_t, pr) ← simplify S t cfg,
replace_target new_t pr
meta def simp (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do S ← simp_lemmas.mk_default,
simplify_goal S cfg >> try triv >> try (reflexivity reducible)
meta def simp_using (hs : list expr) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do S ← simp_lemmas.mk_default,
S ← S^.append hs,
simplify_goal S cfg >> try triv
meta def dsimp_core (s : simp_lemmas) : tactic unit :=
target >>= s^.dsimplify >>= change
meta def dsimp : tactic unit :=
simp_lemmas.mk_default >>= dsimp_core
meta def dsimp_at_core (s : simp_lemmas) (h : expr) : tactic unit :=
do num_reverted : ℕ ← revert h,
expr.pi n bi d b ← target,
h_simp ← s^.dsimplify d,
change $ expr.pi n bi h_simp b,
intron num_reverted
meta def dsimp_at (h : expr) : tactic unit :=
do s ← simp_lemmas.mk_default, dsimp_at_core s h
private meta def is_equation : expr → bool
| (expr.pi n bi d b) := is_equation b
| e := match (expr.is_eq e) with (some a) := tt | none := ff end
private meta def collect_simps : list expr → tactic (list expr)
| [] := return []
| (h :: hs) := do
result ← collect_simps hs,
htype ← infer_type h >>= whnf,
if is_equation htype
then return (h :: result)
else do
pr ← is_prop htype,
return $ if pr then (h :: result) else result
meta def collect_ctx_simps : tactic (list expr) :=
local_context >>= collect_simps
/-- Simplify target using all hypotheses in the local context. -/
meta def simp_using_hs (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do es ← collect_ctx_simps, simp_using es cfg
meta def simph (cfg : simp_config := {}) :=
simp_using_hs cfg
meta def intro1_aux : bool → list name → tactic expr
| ff _ := intro1
| tt (n::ns) := intro n
| _ _ := failed
meta def simp_intro_aux (cfg : simp_config) (updt : bool) : simp_lemmas → bool → list name → tactic simp_lemmas
| S tt [] := try (simplify_goal S cfg) >> return S
| S use_ns ns := do
t ← target,
if t^.is_napp_of `not 1 then
intro1_aux use_ns ns >> simp_intro_aux S use_ns ns^.tail
else if t^.is_arrow then
do {
d ← return t^.binding_domain,
(new_d, h_d_eq_new_d) ← simplify S d cfg,
h_d ← intro1_aux use_ns ns,
h_new_d ← mk_eq_mp h_d_eq_new_d h_d,
assertv_core h_d^.local_pp_name new_d h_new_d,
h_new ← intro1,
new_S ← if updt && is_equation new_d then S^.add h_new else return S,
clear h_d,
simp_intro_aux new_S use_ns ns
}
<|>
-- failed to simplify... we just introduce and continue
(intro1_aux use_ns ns >> simp_intro_aux S use_ns ns^.tail)
else if t^.is_pi || t^.is_let then
intro1_aux use_ns ns >> simp_intro_aux S use_ns ns^.tail
else do
new_t ← whnf t reducible,
if new_t^.is_pi then change new_t >> simp_intro_aux S use_ns ns
else
try (simplify_goal S cfg) >>
mcond (expr.is_pi <$> target)
(simp_intro_aux S use_ns ns)
(if use_ns ∧ ¬ns^.empty then failed else return S)
meta def simp_intros_using (s : simp_lemmas) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
step $ simp_intro_aux cfg ff s ff []
meta def simph_intros_using (s : simp_lemmas) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
step $
do s ← collect_ctx_simps >>= s^.append,
simp_intro_aux cfg tt s ff []
meta def simp_intro_lst_using (ns : list name) (s : simp_lemmas) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
step $ simp_intro_aux cfg ff s tt ns
meta def simph_intro_lst_using (ns : list name) (s : simp_lemmas) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
step $
do s ← collect_ctx_simps >>= s^.append,
simp_intro_aux cfg tt s tt ns
meta def simp_at (h : expr) (extra_lemmas : list expr := []) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do when (expr.is_local_constant h = ff) (fail "tactic simp_at failed, the given expression is not a hypothesis"),
htype ← infer_type h,
S ← simp_lemmas.mk_default,
S ← S^.append extra_lemmas,
(new_htype, heq) ← simplify S htype cfg,
assert (expr.local_pp_name h) new_htype,
mk_eq_mp heq h >>= exact,
try $ clear h
meta def simp_at_using_hs (h : expr) (extra_lemmas : list expr := []) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do hs ← collect_ctx_simps,
simp_at h (list.filter (≠ h) hs ++ extra_lemmas) cfg
meta def simph_at (h : expr) (extra_lemmas : list expr := []) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
simp_at_using_hs h extra_lemmas cfg
meta def mk_eq_simp_ext (simp_ext : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) : tactic unit :=
do (lhs, rhs) ← target >>= match_eq,
(new_rhs, heq) ← simp_ext lhs,
unify rhs new_rhs,
exact heq
/- Simp attribute support -/
meta def to_simp_lemmas : simp_lemmas → list name → tactic simp_lemmas
| S [] := return S
| S (n::ns) := do S' ← S^.add_simp n, to_simp_lemmas S' ns
meta def mk_simp_attr (attr_name : name) : command :=
do let t := ```(caching_user_attribute simp_lemmas),
v ← to_expr ``({name := %%(quote attr_name),
descr := "simplifier attribute",
mk_cache := λ ns, do {tactic.to_simp_lemmas simp_lemmas.mk ns},
dependencies := [`reducibility] } : caching_user_attribute simp_lemmas),
add_decl (declaration.defn attr_name [] t v reducibility_hints.abbrev ff),
attribute.register attr_name
meta def get_user_simp_lemmas (attr_name : name) : tactic simp_lemmas :=
if attr_name = `default then simp_lemmas.mk_default
else do
cnst ← return (expr.const attr_name []),
attr ← eval_expr (caching_user_attribute simp_lemmas) cnst,
caching_user_attribute.get_cache attr
meta def join_user_simp_lemmas_core : simp_lemmas → list name → tactic simp_lemmas
| S [] := return S
| S (attr_name::R) := do S' ← get_user_simp_lemmas attr_name, join_user_simp_lemmas_core (S^.join S') R
meta def join_user_simp_lemmas : list name → tactic simp_lemmas
| [] := simp_lemmas.mk_default
| attr_names := join_user_simp_lemmas_core simp_lemmas.mk attr_names
/- Normalize numerical expression, returns a pair (n, pr) where n is the resultant numeral,
and pr is a proof that the input argument is equal to n. -/
meta constant norm_num : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
meta def simplify_top_down {α} (a : α) (pre : α → expr → tactic (α × expr × expr)) (e : expr) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic (α × expr × expr) :=
ext_simplify_core a cfg simp_lemmas.mk (λ _, failed)
(λ a _ _ _ e, do (new_a, new_e, pr) ← pre a e, guard (¬ new_e =ₐ e), return (new_a, new_e, some pr, tt))
(λ _ _ _ _ _, failed)
`eq e
meta def simp_top_down (pre : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target,
(_, new_target, pr) ← simplify_top_down () (λ _ e, do (new_e, pr) ← pre e, return ((), new_e, pr)) t cfg,
replace_target new_target pr
meta def simplify_bottom_up {α} (a : α) (post : α → expr → tactic (α × expr × expr)) (e : expr) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic (α × expr × expr) :=
ext_simplify_core a cfg simp_lemmas.mk (λ _, failed)
(λ _ _ _ _ _, failed)
(λ a _ _ _ e, do (new_a, new_e, pr) ← post a e, guard (¬ new_e =ₐ e), return (new_a, new_e, some pr, tt))
`eq e
meta def simp_bottom_up (post : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target,
(_, new_target, pr) ← simplify_bottom_up () (λ _ e, do (new_e, pr) ← post e, return ((), new_e, pr)) t cfg,
replace_target new_target pr
end tactic
export tactic (mk_simp_attr)
|
b329d7edd3fc3e46e4fd7642bb87642f0f7ef5ed | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/data/rat/order.lean | a328433fd2dbf30165e9a4471502e29e88526efe | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,515 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.rat.basic
/-!
# Order for Rational Numbers
## Summary
We define the order on `ℚ`, prove that `ℚ` is a discrete, linearly ordered field, and define
functions such as `abs` and `sqrt` that depend on this order.
## Notations
- `/.` is infix notation for `rat.mk`.
## Tags
rat, rationals, field, ℚ, numerator, denominator, num, denom, order, ordering, sqrt, abs
-/
namespace rat
variables (a b c : ℚ)
open_locale rat
protected def nonneg : ℚ → Prop
| ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ := 0 ≤ n
@[simp] theorem mk_nonneg (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (h : 0 < b) : (a /. b).nonneg ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
begin
generalize ha : a /. b = x, cases x with n₁ d₁ h₁ c₁, rw num_denom' at ha,
simp [rat.nonneg],
have d0 := int.coe_nat_lt.2 h₁,
have := (mk_eq (ne_of_gt h) (ne_of_gt d0)).1 ha,
constructor; intro h₂,
{ apply nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right _ d0,
rw this, exact mul_nonneg h₂ (le_of_lt h) },
{ apply nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right _ h,
rw ← this, exact mul_nonneg h₂ (int.coe_zero_le _) },
end
protected lemma nonneg_add {a b} : rat.nonneg a → rat.nonneg b → rat.nonneg (a + b) :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
begin
have d₁0 : 0 < (d₁:ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h₁),
have d₂0 : 0 < (d₂:ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h₂),
simp [d₁0, d₂0, h₁, h₂, mul_pos' d₁0 d₂0],
intros n₁0 n₂0,
apply add_nonneg; apply mul_nonneg; {assumption <|> apply int.coe_zero_le},
end
protected lemma nonneg_mul {a b} : rat.nonneg a → rat.nonneg b → rat.nonneg (a * b) :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
begin
have d₁0 : 0 < (d₁:ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h₁),
have d₂0 : 0 < (d₂:ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h₂),
simp [d₁0, d₂0, h₁, h₂, mul_pos' d₁0 d₂0],
exact mul_nonneg
end
protected lemma nonneg_antisymm {a} : rat.nonneg a → rat.nonneg (-a) → a = 0 :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
begin
have d0 : 0 < (d:ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h),
simp [d0, h],
exact λ h₁ h₂, le_antisymm h₂ h₁
end
protected lemma nonneg_total : rat.nonneg a ∨ rat.nonneg (-a) :=
by cases a with n; exact
or.imp_right neg_nonneg_of_nonpos (le_total 0 n)
instance decidable_nonneg : decidable (rat.nonneg a) :=
by cases a; unfold rat.nonneg; apply_instance
protected def le (a b : ℚ) := rat.nonneg (b - a)
instance : has_le ℚ := ⟨rat.le⟩
instance decidable_le : decidable_rel ((≤) : ℚ → ℚ → Prop)
| a b := show decidable (rat.nonneg (b - a)), by apply_instance
protected theorem le_def {a b c d : ℤ} (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) :
a /. b ≤ c /. d ↔ a * d ≤ c * b :=
show rat.nonneg _ ↔ _,
by simpa [ne_of_gt b0, ne_of_gt d0, mul_pos' b0 d0, mul_comm]
using @sub_nonneg _ _ (b * c) (a * d)
protected theorem le_refl : a ≤ a :=
show rat.nonneg (a - a), by rw sub_self; exact le_refl (0 : ℤ)
protected theorem le_total : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a :=
by have := rat.nonneg_total (b - a); rwa neg_sub at this
protected theorem le_antisymm {a b : ℚ} (hab : a ≤ b) (hba : b ≤ a) : a = b :=
by have := eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero (rat.nonneg_antisymm hba $ by simpa);
rwa neg_neg at this
protected theorem le_trans {a b c : ℚ} (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ≤ c :=
have rat.nonneg (b - a + (c - b)), from rat.nonneg_add hab hbc,
by simpa
instance : decidable_linear_order ℚ :=
{ le := rat.le,
le_refl := rat.le_refl,
le_trans := @rat.le_trans,
le_antisymm := @rat.le_antisymm,
le_total := rat.le_total,
decidable_eq := by apply_instance,
decidable_le := assume a b, rat.decidable_nonneg (b - a) }
/- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
instance : has_lt ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : lattice.distrib_lattice ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : lattice.lattice ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : lattice.semilattice_inf ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : lattice.semilattice_sup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : lattice.has_inf ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : lattice.has_sup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : linear_order ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : partial_order ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : preorder ℚ := by apply_instance
protected lemma le_def' {p q : ℚ} : p ≤ q ↔ p.num * q.denom ≤ q.num * p.denom :=
begin
rw [←(@num_denom q), ←(@num_denom p)],
conv_rhs { simp only [num_denom] },
exact rat.le_def (by exact_mod_cast p.pos) (by exact_mod_cast q.pos)
end
protected lemma lt_def {p q : ℚ} : p < q ↔ p.num * q.denom < q.num * p.denom :=
begin
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, rat.le_def'],
suffices : p ≠ q ↔ p.num * q.denom ≠ q.num * p.denom, by {
split; intro h,
{ exact lt_iff_le_and_ne.elim_right ⟨h.left, (this.elim_left h.right)⟩ },
{ have tmp := lt_iff_le_and_ne.elim_left h, exact ⟨tmp.left, this.elim_right tmp.right⟩ }},
exact (not_iff_not.elim_right eq_iff_mul_eq_mul)
end
theorem nonneg_iff_zero_le {a} : rat.nonneg a ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
show rat.nonneg a ↔ rat.nonneg (a - 0), by simp
theorem num_nonneg_iff_zero_le : ∀ {a : ℚ}, 0 ≤ a.num ↔ 0 ≤ a
| ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ := @nonneg_iff_zero_le ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
protected theorem add_le_add_left {a b c : ℚ} : c + a ≤ c + b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by unfold has_le.le rat.le; rw add_sub_add_left_eq_sub
protected theorem mul_nonneg {a b : ℚ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a * b :=
by rw ← nonneg_iff_zero_le at ha hb ⊢; exact rat.nonneg_mul ha hb
instance : discrete_linear_ordered_field ℚ :=
{ zero_lt_one := dec_trivial,
add_le_add_left := assume a b ab c, rat.add_le_add_left.2 ab,
add_lt_add_left := assume a b ab c, lt_of_not_ge $ λ ba,
not_le_of_lt ab $ rat.add_le_add_left.1 ba,
mul_nonneg := @rat.mul_nonneg,
mul_pos := assume a b ha hb, lt_of_le_of_ne
(rat.mul_nonneg (le_of_lt ha) (le_of_lt hb))
(mul_ne_zero (ne_of_lt ha).symm (ne_of_lt hb).symm).symm,
..rat.discrete_field, ..rat.decidable_linear_order }
/- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
instance : linear_ordered_field ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : linear_ordered_comm_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : linear_ordered_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : ordered_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : decidable_linear_ordered_semiring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : linear_ordered_semiring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : ordered_semiring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : decidable_linear_ordered_comm_group ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : ordered_comm_group ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : ordered_cancel_comm_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : ordered_comm_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
attribute [irreducible] rat.le
theorem num_pos_iff_pos {a : ℚ} : 0 < a.num ↔ 0 < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $
by simpa [(by cases a; refl : (-a).num = -a.num)]
using @num_nonneg_iff_zero_le (-a)
lemma div_lt_div_iff_mul_lt_mul {a b c d : ℤ} (b_pos : 0 < b) (d_pos : 0 < d) :
(a : ℚ) / b < c / d ↔ a * d < c * b :=
begin
simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le],
apply and_congr,
{ simp [div_num_denom, (rat.le_def b_pos d_pos)] },
{ apply not_iff_not_of_iff, simp [div_num_denom, (rat.le_def d_pos b_pos)] }
end
lemma lt_one_iff_num_lt_denom {q : ℚ} : q < 1 ↔ q.num < q.denom :=
begin
cases decidable.em (0 < q) with q_pos q_nonpos,
{ simp [rat.lt_def] },
{ replace q_nonpos : q ≤ 0, from not_lt.elim_left q_nonpos,
have : q.num < q.denom, by
{ have : ¬0 < q.num ↔ ¬0 < q, from not_iff_not.elim_right num_pos_iff_pos,
simp only [not_lt] at this,
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (this.elim_right q_nonpos) (by exact_mod_cast q.pos) },
simp only [this, (lt_of_le_of_lt q_nonpos zero_lt_one)] }
end
theorem abs_def (q : ℚ) : abs q = q.num.nat_abs /. q.denom :=
begin
have hz : (0:ℚ) = 0 /. 1 := rfl,
cases le_total q 0 with hq hq,
{ rw [abs_of_nonpos hq],
rw [←(@num_denom q), hz, rat.le_def (int.coe_nat_pos.2 q.pos) zero_lt_one,
mul_one, zero_mul] at hq,
rw [int.of_nat_nat_abs_of_nonpos hq, ← neg_def, num_denom] },
{ rw [abs_of_nonneg hq],
rw [←(@num_denom q), hz, rat.le_def zero_lt_one (int.coe_nat_pos.2 q.pos),
mul_one, zero_mul] at hq,
rw [int.nat_abs_of_nonneg hq, num_denom] }
end
section sqrt
def sqrt (q : ℚ) : ℚ := rat.mk (int.sqrt q.num) (nat.sqrt q.denom)
theorem sqrt_eq (q : ℚ) : rat.sqrt (q*q) = abs q :=
by rw [sqrt, mul_self_num, mul_self_denom, int.sqrt_eq, nat.sqrt_eq, abs_def]
theorem exists_mul_self (x : ℚ) : (∃ q, q * q = x) ↔ rat.sqrt x * rat.sqrt x = x :=
⟨λ ⟨n, hn⟩, by rw [← hn, sqrt_eq, abs_mul_abs_self],
λ h, ⟨rat.sqrt x, h⟩⟩
theorem sqrt_nonneg (q : ℚ) : 0 ≤ rat.sqrt q :=
nonneg_iff_zero_le.1 $ (mk_nonneg _ $ int.coe_nat_pos.2 $
nat.pos_of_ne_zero $ λ H, nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 q.pos $ nat.sqrt_eq_zero.1 H).2 trivial
end sqrt
end rat
|
7e9b5a31e94d361ede3d5cd260b45e649cbd2656 | 2a70b774d16dbdf5a533432ee0ebab6838df0948 | /_target/deps/mathlib/src/logic/function/basic.lean | d702206c5bcb161ca359df28bca7234b88fca63c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hjvromen/lewis | 40b035973df7c77ebf927afab7878c76d05ff758 | 105b675f73630f028ad5d890897a51b3c1146fb0 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,944,636,343 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 327,553,599 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,776 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import logic.basic
import data.option.defs
/-!
# Miscellaneous function constructions and lemmas
-/
universes u v w
namespace function
section
variables {α β γ : Sort*} {f : α → β}
/-- Evaluate a function at an argument. Useful if you want to talk about the partially applied
`function.eval x : (Π x, β x) → β x`. -/
@[reducible] def eval {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : Π x, β x) : β x := f x
@[simp] lemma eval_apply {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : Π x, β x) : eval x f = f x := rfl
lemma comp_apply {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {φ : Sort w} (f : β → φ) (g : α → β) (a : α) :
(f ∘ g) a = f (g a) := rfl
lemma const_def {y : β} : (λ x : α, y) = const α y := rfl
@[simp] lemma const_apply {y : β} {x : α} : const α y x = y := rfl
@[simp] lemma const_comp {f : α → β} {c : γ} : const β c ∘ f = const α c := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_const {f : β → γ} {b : β} : f ∘ const α b = const α (f b) := rfl
lemma id_def : @id α = λ x, x := rfl
lemma hfunext {α α': Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {β' : α' → Sort v} {f : Πa, β a} {f' : Πa, β' a}
(hα : α = α') (h : ∀a a', a == a' → f a == f' a') : f == f' :=
begin
subst hα,
have : ∀a, f a == f' a,
{ intro a, exact h a a (heq.refl a) },
have : β = β',
{ funext a, exact type_eq_of_heq (this a) },
subst this,
apply heq_of_eq,
funext a,
exact eq_of_heq (this a)
end
lemma funext_iff {β : α → Sort*} {f₁ f₂ : Π (x : α), β x} : f₁ = f₂ ↔ (∀a, f₁ a = f₂ a) :=
iff.intro (assume h a, h ▸ rfl) funext
@[simp] theorem injective.eq_iff (I : injective f) {a b : α} :
f a = f b ↔ a = b :=
⟨@I _ _, congr_arg f⟩
theorem injective.eq_iff' (I : injective f) {a b : α} {c : β} (h : f b = c) :
f a = c ↔ a = b :=
h ▸ I.eq_iff
lemma injective.ne (hf : injective f) {a₁ a₂ : α} : a₁ ≠ a₂ → f a₁ ≠ f a₂ :=
mt (assume h, hf h)
lemma injective.ne_iff (hf : injective f) {x y : α} : f x ≠ f y ↔ x ≠ y :=
⟨mt $ congr_arg f, hf.ne⟩
lemma injective.ne_iff' (hf : injective f) {x y : α} {z : β} (h : f y = z) :
f x ≠ z ↔ x ≠ y :=
h ▸ hf.ne_iff
/-- If the co-domain `β` of an injective function `f : α → β` has decidable equality, then
the domain `α` also has decidable equality. -/
def injective.decidable_eq [decidable_eq β] (I : injective f) : decidable_eq α :=
λ a b, decidable_of_iff _ I.eq_iff
lemma injective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (I : injective (f ∘ g)) : injective g :=
λ x y h, I $ show f (g x) = f (g y), from congr_arg f h
lemma surjective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (S : surjective (f ∘ g)) : surjective f :=
λ y, let ⟨x, h⟩ := S y in ⟨g x, h⟩
instance decidable_eq_pfun (p : Prop) [decidable p] (α : p → Type*)
[Π hp, decidable_eq (α hp)] : decidable_eq (Π hp, α hp)
| f g := decidable_of_iff (∀ hp, f hp = g hp) funext_iff.symm
theorem surjective.forall {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y, p y) ↔ ∀ x, p (f x) :=
⟨λ h x, h (f x), λ h y, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y in hx ▸ h x⟩
theorem surjective.forall₂ {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.forall.trans $ forall_congr $ λ x, hf.forall
theorem surjective.forall₃ {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.forall.trans $ forall_congr $ λ x, hf.forall₂
theorem surjective.exists {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y, p y) ↔ ∃ x, p (f x) :=
⟨λ ⟨y, hy⟩, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y in ⟨x, hx.symm ▸ hy⟩, λ ⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨f x, hx⟩⟩
theorem surjective.exists₂ {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.exists.trans $ exists_congr $ λ x, hf.exists
theorem surjective.exists₃ {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.exists.trans $ exists_congr $ λ x, hf.exists₂
/-- Cantor's diagonal argument implies that there are no surjective functions from `α`
to `set α`. -/
theorem cantor_surjective {α} (f : α → set α) : ¬ function.surjective f | h :=
let ⟨D, e⟩ := h (λ a, ¬ f a a) in
(iff_not_self (f D D)).1 $ iff_of_eq (congr_fun e D)
/-- Cantor's diagonal argument implies that there are no injective functions from `set α` to `α`. -/
theorem cantor_injective {α : Type*} (f : (set α) → α) :
¬ function.injective f | i :=
cantor_surjective (λ a b, ∀ U, a = f U → U b) $
right_inverse.surjective (λ U, funext $ λ a, propext ⟨λ h, h U rfl, λ h' U' e, i e ▸ h'⟩)
/-- `g` is a partial inverse to `f` (an injective but not necessarily
surjective function) if `g y = some x` implies `f x = y`, and `g y = none`
implies that `y` is not in the range of `f`. -/
def is_partial_inv {α β} (f : α → β) (g : β → option α) : Prop :=
∀ x y, g y = some x ↔ f x = y
theorem is_partial_inv_left {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : is_partial_inv f g) (x) : g (f x) = some x :=
(H _ _).2 rfl
theorem injective_of_partial_inv {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : is_partial_inv f g) : injective f :=
λ a b h, option.some.inj $ ((H _ _).2 h).symm.trans ((H _ _).2 rfl)
theorem injective_of_partial_inv_right {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : is_partial_inv f g)
(x y b) (h₁ : b ∈ g x) (h₂ : b ∈ g y) : x = y :=
((H _ _).1 h₁).symm.trans ((H _ _).1 h₂)
theorem left_inverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : left_inverse f g) : f ∘ g = id :=
funext h
theorem left_inverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : left_inverse f g ↔ f ∘ g = id :=
⟨left_inverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
theorem right_inverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : right_inverse f g) : g ∘ f = id :=
funext h
theorem right_inverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : right_inverse f g ↔ g ∘ f = id :=
⟨right_inverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
theorem left_inverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β}
(hf : left_inverse f g) (hh : left_inverse h i) : left_inverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
assume a, show h (f (g (i a))) = a, by rw [hf (i a), hh a]
theorem right_inverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β}
(hf : right_inverse f g) (hh : right_inverse h i) : right_inverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
left_inverse.comp hh hf
theorem left_inverse.right_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : left_inverse g f) :
right_inverse f g := h
theorem right_inverse.left_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : right_inverse g f) :
left_inverse f g := h
theorem left_inverse.surjective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : left_inverse f g) :
surjective f :=
h.right_inverse.surjective
theorem right_inverse.injective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : right_inverse f g) :
injective f :=
h.left_inverse.injective
theorem left_inverse.eq_right_inverse {f : α → β} {g₁ g₂ : β → α} (h₁ : left_inverse g₁ f)
(h₂ : right_inverse g₂ f) :
g₁ = g₂ :=
calc g₁ = g₁ ∘ f ∘ g₂ : by rw [h₂.comp_eq_id, comp.right_id]
... = g₂ : by rw [← comp.assoc, h₁.comp_eq_id, comp.left_id]
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
/-- We can use choice to construct explicitly a partial inverse for
a given injective function `f`. -/
noncomputable def partial_inv {α β} (f : α → β) (b : β) : option α :=
if h : ∃ a, f a = b then some (classical.some h) else none
theorem partial_inv_of_injective {α β} {f : α → β} (I : injective f) :
is_partial_inv f (partial_inv f) | a b :=
⟨λ h, if h' : ∃ a, f a = b then begin
rw [partial_inv, dif_pos h'] at h,
injection h with h, subst h,
apply classical.some_spec h'
end else by rw [partial_inv, dif_neg h'] at h; contradiction,
λ e, e ▸ have h : ∃ a', f a' = f a, from ⟨_, rfl⟩,
(dif_pos h).trans (congr_arg _ (I $ classical.some_spec h))⟩
theorem partial_inv_left {α β} {f : α → β} (I : injective f) : ∀ x, partial_inv f (f x) = some x :=
is_partial_inv_left (partial_inv_of_injective I)
end
section inv_fun
variables {α : Type u} [n : nonempty α] {β : Sort v} {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α} {b : β}
include n
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
/-- Construct the inverse for a function `f` on domain `s`. This function is a right inverse of `f`
on `f '' s`. -/
noncomputable def inv_fun_on (f : α → β) (s : set α) (b : β) : α :=
if h : ∃a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b then classical.some h else classical.choice n
theorem inv_fun_on_pos (h : ∃a∈s, f a = b) : inv_fun_on f s b ∈ s ∧ f (inv_fun_on f s b) = b :=
by rw [bex_def] at h; rw [inv_fun_on, dif_pos h]; exact classical.some_spec h
theorem inv_fun_on_mem (h : ∃a∈s, f a = b) : inv_fun_on f s b ∈ s := (inv_fun_on_pos h).left
theorem inv_fun_on_eq (h : ∃a∈s, f a = b) : f (inv_fun_on f s b) = b := (inv_fun_on_pos h).right
theorem inv_fun_on_eq' (h : ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), f x = f y → x = y) (ha : a ∈ s) :
inv_fun_on f s (f a) = a :=
have ∃a'∈s, f a' = f a, from ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩,
h _ (inv_fun_on_mem this) _ ha (inv_fun_on_eq this)
theorem inv_fun_on_neg (h : ¬ ∃a∈s, f a = b) : inv_fun_on f s b = classical.choice n :=
by rw [bex_def] at h; rw [inv_fun_on, dif_neg h]
/-- The inverse of a function (which is a left inverse if `f` is injective
and a right inverse if `f` is surjective). -/
noncomputable def inv_fun (f : α → β) : β → α := inv_fun_on f set.univ
theorem inv_fun_eq (h : ∃a, f a = b) : f (inv_fun f b) = b :=
inv_fun_on_eq $ let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h in ⟨a, trivial, ha⟩
lemma inv_fun_neg (h : ¬ ∃ a, f a = b) : inv_fun f b = classical.choice n :=
by refine inv_fun_on_neg (mt _ h); exact assume ⟨a, _, ha⟩, ⟨a, ha⟩
theorem inv_fun_eq_of_injective_of_right_inverse {g : β → α}
(hf : injective f) (hg : right_inverse g f) : inv_fun f = g :=
funext $ assume b,
hf begin rw [hg b], exact inv_fun_eq ⟨g b, hg b⟩ end
lemma right_inverse_inv_fun (hf : surjective f) : right_inverse (inv_fun f) f :=
assume b, inv_fun_eq $ hf b
lemma left_inverse_inv_fun (hf : injective f) : left_inverse (inv_fun f) f :=
assume b,
have f (inv_fun f (f b)) = f b,
from inv_fun_eq ⟨b, rfl⟩,
hf this
lemma inv_fun_surjective (hf : injective f) : surjective (inv_fun f) :=
(left_inverse_inv_fun hf).surjective
lemma inv_fun_comp (hf : injective f) : inv_fun f ∘ f = id := funext $ left_inverse_inv_fun hf
end inv_fun
section inv_fun
variables {α : Type u} [i : nonempty α] {β : Sort v} {f : α → β}
include i
lemma injective.has_left_inverse (hf : injective f) : has_left_inverse f :=
⟨inv_fun f, left_inverse_inv_fun hf⟩
lemma injective_iff_has_left_inverse : injective f ↔ has_left_inverse f :=
⟨injective.has_left_inverse, has_left_inverse.injective⟩
end inv_fun
section surj_inv
variables {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {f : α → β}
/-- The inverse of a surjective function. (Unlike `inv_fun`, this does not require
`α` to be inhabited.) -/
noncomputable def surj_inv {f : α → β} (h : surjective f) (b : β) : α := classical.some (h b)
lemma surj_inv_eq (h : surjective f) (b) : f (surj_inv h b) = b := classical.some_spec (h b)
lemma right_inverse_surj_inv (hf : surjective f) : right_inverse (surj_inv hf) f :=
surj_inv_eq hf
lemma left_inverse_surj_inv (hf : bijective f) : left_inverse (surj_inv hf.2) f :=
right_inverse_of_injective_of_left_inverse hf.1 (right_inverse_surj_inv hf.2)
lemma surjective.has_right_inverse (hf : surjective f) : has_right_inverse f :=
⟨_, right_inverse_surj_inv hf⟩
lemma surjective_iff_has_right_inverse : surjective f ↔ has_right_inverse f :=
⟨surjective.has_right_inverse, has_right_inverse.surjective⟩
lemma bijective_iff_has_inverse : bijective f ↔ ∃ g, left_inverse g f ∧ right_inverse g f :=
⟨λ hf, ⟨_, left_inverse_surj_inv hf, right_inverse_surj_inv hf.2⟩,
λ ⟨g, gl, gr⟩, ⟨gl.injective, gr.surjective⟩⟩
lemma injective_surj_inv (h : surjective f) : injective (surj_inv h) :=
(right_inverse_surj_inv h).injective
end surj_inv
section update
variables {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {α' : Sort w} [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq α']
/-- Replacing the value of a function at a given point by a given value. -/
def update (f : Πa, β a) (a' : α) (v : β a') (a : α) : β a :=
if h : a = a' then eq.rec v h.symm else f a
/-- On non-dependent functions, `function.update` can be expressed as an `ite` -/
lemma update_apply {β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a' : α) (b : β) (a : α) :
update f a' b a = if a = a' then b else f a :=
begin
dunfold update,
congr,
funext,
rw eq_rec_constant,
end
@[simp] lemma update_same (a : α) (v : β a) (f : Πa, β a) : update f a v a = v :=
dif_pos rfl
lemma update_injective (f : Πa, β a) (a' : α) : injective (update f a') :=
λ v v' h, have _ := congr_fun h a', by rwa [update_same, update_same] at this
@[simp] lemma update_noteq {a a' : α} (h : a ≠ a') (v : β a') (f : Πa, β a) : update f a' v a = f a :=
dif_neg h
lemma forall_update_iff (f : Π a, β a) {a : α} {b : β a} (p : Π a, β a → Prop) :
(∀ x, p x (update f a b x)) ↔ p a b ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, p x (f x) :=
calc (∀ x, p x (update f a b x)) ↔ ∀ x, (x = a ∨ x ≠ a) → p x (update f a b x) :
by simp only [ne.def, classical.em, forall_prop_of_true]
... ↔ p a b ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, p x (f x) :
by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib] { contextual := tt }
lemma update_eq_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {f g : Π a, β a} :
update f a b = g ↔ b = g a ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, f x = g x :=
funext_iff.trans $ forall_update_iff _ (λ x y, y = g x)
lemma eq_update_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {f g : Π a, β a} :
g = update f a b ↔ g a = b ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, g x = f x :=
funext_iff.trans $ forall_update_iff _ (λ x y, g x = y)
@[simp] lemma update_eq_self (a : α) (f : Πa, β a) : update f a (f a) = f :=
update_eq_iff.2 ⟨rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
lemma update_comp {β : Sort v} (f : α → β) {g : α' → α} (hg : injective g) (a : α') (v : β) :
(update f (g a) v) ∘ g = update (f ∘ g) a v :=
eq_update_iff.2 ⟨update_same _ _ _, λ x hx, update_noteq (hg.ne hx) _ _⟩
lemma apply_update {ι : Sort*} [decidable_eq ι] {α β : ι → Sort*}
(f : Π i, α i → β i) (g : Π i, α i) (i : ι) (v : α i) (j : ι) :
f j (update g i v j) = update (λ k, f k (g k)) i (f i v) j :=
begin
by_cases h : j = i,
{ subst j, simp },
{ simp [h] }
end
lemma comp_update {α' : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (f : α' → β) (g : α → α') (i : α) (v : α') :
f ∘ (update g i v) = update (f ∘ g) i (f v) :=
funext $ apply_update _ _ _ _
theorem update_comm {α} [decidable_eq α] {β : α → Sort*}
{a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (v : β a) (w : β b) (f : Πa, β a) :
update (update f a v) b w = update (update f b w) a v :=
begin
funext c, simp only [update],
by_cases h₁ : c = b; by_cases h₂ : c = a; try {simp [h₁, h₂]},
cases h (h₂.symm.trans h₁),
end
@[simp] theorem update_idem {α} [decidable_eq α] {β : α → Sort*}
{a : α} (v w : β a) (f : Πa, β a) : update (update f a v) a w = update f a w :=
by {funext b, by_cases b = a; simp [update, h]}
end update
section extend
noncomputable theory
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
variables {α β γ : Type*} {f : α → β}
/-- `extend f g e'` extends a function `g : α → γ`
along a function `f : α → β` to a function `β → γ`,
by using the values of `g` on the range of `f`
and the values of an auxiliary function `e' : β → γ` elsewhere.
Mostly useful when `f` is injective. -/
def extend (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) : β → γ :=
λ b, if h : ∃ a, f a = b then g (classical.some h) else e' b
lemma extend_def (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) (b : β) :
extend f g e' b = if h : ∃ a, f a = b then g (classical.some h) else e' b := rfl
@[simp] lemma extend_apply (hf : injective f) (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) (a : α) :
extend f g e' (f a) = g a :=
begin
simp only [extend_def, dif_pos, exists_apply_eq_apply],
exact congr_arg g (hf $ classical.some_spec (exists_apply_eq_apply f a))
end
@[simp] lemma extend_comp (hf : injective f) (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) :
extend f g e' ∘ f = g :=
funext $ λ a, extend_apply hf g e' a
end extend
lemma uncurry_def {α β γ} (f : α → β → γ) : uncurry f = (λp, f p.1 p.2) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma uncurry_apply_pair {α β γ} (f : α → β → γ) (x : α) (y : β) :
uncurry f (x, y) = f x y :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma curry_apply {α β γ} (f : α × β → γ) (x : α) (y : β) :
curry f x y = f (x, y) :=
rfl
section bicomp
variables {α β γ δ ε : Type*}
/-- Compose a binary function `f` with a pair of unary functions `g` and `h`.
If both arguments of `f` have the same type and `g = h`, then `bicompl f g g = f on g`. -/
def bicompl (f : γ → δ → ε) (g : α → γ) (h : β → δ) (a b) :=
f (g a) (h b)
/-- Compose an unary function `f` with a binary function `g`. -/
def bicompr (f : γ → δ) (g : α → β → γ) (a b) :=
f (g a b)
-- Suggested local notation:
local notation f `∘₂` g := bicompr f g
lemma uncurry_bicompr (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
uncurry (g ∘₂ f) = (g ∘ uncurry f) := rfl
lemma uncurry_bicompl (f : γ → δ → ε) (g : α → γ) (h : β → δ) :
uncurry (bicompl f g h) = (uncurry f) ∘ (prod.map g h) :=
rfl
end bicomp
section uncurry
variables {α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- Records a way to turn an element of `α` into a function from `β` to `γ`. The most generic use
is to recursively uncurry. For instance `f : α → β → γ → δ` will be turned into
`↿f : α × β × γ → δ`. One can also add instances for bundled maps. -/
class has_uncurry (α : Type*) (β : out_param Type*) (γ : out_param Type*) := (uncurry : α → (β → γ))
/-- Uncurrying operator. The most generic use is to recursively uncurry. For instance
`f : α → β → γ → δ` will be turned into `↿f : α × β × γ → δ`. One can also add instances
for bundled maps.-/
add_decl_doc has_uncurry.uncurry
notation `↿`:max x:max := has_uncurry.uncurry x
instance has_uncurry_base : has_uncurry (α → β) α β := ⟨id⟩
instance has_uncurry_induction [has_uncurry β γ δ] : has_uncurry (α → β) (α × γ) δ :=
⟨λ f p, ↿(f p.1) p.2⟩
end uncurry
/-- A function is involutive, if `f ∘ f = id`. -/
def involutive {α} (f : α → α) : Prop := ∀ x, f (f x) = x
lemma involutive_iff_iter_2_eq_id {α} {f : α → α} : involutive f ↔ (f^[2] = id) :=
funext_iff.symm
namespace involutive
variables {α : Sort u} {f : α → α} (h : involutive f)
include h
@[simp]
lemma comp_self : f ∘ f = id := funext h
protected lemma left_inverse : left_inverse f f := h
protected lemma right_inverse : right_inverse f f := h
protected lemma injective : injective f := h.left_inverse.injective
protected lemma surjective : surjective f := λ x, ⟨f x, h x⟩
protected lemma bijective : bijective f := ⟨h.injective, h.surjective⟩
/-- Involuting an `ite` of an involuted value `x : α` negates the `Prop` condition in the `ite`. -/
protected lemma ite_not (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x : α) :
f (ite P x (f x)) = ite (¬ P) x (f x) :=
by rw [apply_ite f, h, ite_not]
end involutive
/-- The property of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` being injective.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the corresponding function `α × β → γ` being injective.
-/
@[reducible] def injective2 {α β γ} (f : α → β → γ) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂⦄, f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂ → a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂
namespace injective2
variables {α β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → γ)
protected lemma left (hf : injective2 f) ⦃a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂⦄ (h : f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂) : a₁ = a₂ :=
(hf h).1
protected lemma right (hf : injective2 f) ⦃a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂⦄ (h : f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂) : b₁ = b₂ :=
(hf h).2
lemma eq_iff (hf : injective2 f) ⦃a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂⦄ : f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ :=
⟨λ h, hf h, λ⟨h1, h2⟩, congr_arg2 f h1 h2⟩
end injective2
section sometimes
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
/-- `sometimes f` evaluates to some value of `f`, if it exists. This function is especially
interesting in the case where `α` is a proposition, in which case `f` is necessarily a
constant function, so that `sometimes f = f a` for all `a`. -/
noncomputable def sometimes {α β} [nonempty β] (f : α → β) : β :=
if h : nonempty α then f (classical.choice h) else classical.choice ‹_›
theorem sometimes_eq {p : Prop} {α} [nonempty α] (f : p → α) (a : p) : sometimes f = f a :=
dif_pos ⟨a⟩
theorem sometimes_spec {p : Prop} {α} [nonempty α]
(P : α → Prop) (f : p → α) (a : p) (h : P (f a)) : P (sometimes f) :=
by rwa sometimes_eq
end sometimes
end function
/-- `s.piecewise f g` is the function equal to `f` on the set `s`, and to `g` on its complement. -/
def set.piecewise {α : Type u} {β : α → Sort v} (s : set α) (f g : Πi, β i) [∀j, decidable (j ∈ s)] :
Πi, β i :=
λi, if i ∈ s then f i else g i
|
631bcc789585b7b2f82e7155c3b060fba0b66194 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/algebra/field/basic.lean | 814b4696d87dc4ac1ef4c43c671da5a7a22f34c5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,277 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.field.defs
import algebra.group_with_zero.units.lemmas
import algebra.hom.ring
import algebra.ring.commute
/-!
# Lemmas about division (semi)rings and (semi)fields
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
-/
open function order_dual set
set_option old_structure_cmd true
universe u
variables {α β K : Type*}
section division_semiring
variables [division_semiring α] {a b c d : α}
lemma add_div (a b c : α) : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, add_mul]
@[field_simps] lemma div_add_div_same (a b c : α) : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
(add_div _ _ _).symm
lemma same_add_div (h : b ≠ 0) : (b + a) / b = 1 + a / b := by rw [←div_self h, add_div]
lemma div_add_same (h : b ≠ 0) : (a + b) / b = a / b + 1 := by rw [←div_self h, add_div]
lemma one_add_div (h : b ≠ 0 ) : 1 + a / b = (b + a) / b := (same_add_div h).symm
lemma div_add_one (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b + 1 = (a + b) / b := (div_add_same h).symm
lemma one_div_mul_add_mul_one_div_eq_one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(1 / a) * (a + b) * (1 / b) = 1 / a + 1 / b :=
by rw [mul_add, one_div_mul_cancel ha, add_mul, one_mul, mul_assoc, mul_one_div_cancel hb, mul_one,
add_comm]
lemma add_div_eq_mul_add_div (a b : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a + b / c = (a * c + b) / c :=
(eq_div_iff_mul_eq hc).2 $ by rw [right_distrib, (div_mul_cancel _ hc)]
@[field_simps] lemma add_div' (a b c : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) : b + a / c = (b * c + a) / c :=
by rw [add_div, mul_div_cancel _ hc]
@[field_simps] lemma div_add' (a b c : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c + b = (a + b * c) / c :=
by rwa [add_comm, add_div', add_comm]
protected lemma commute.div_add_div (hbc : commute b c) (hbd : commute b d) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hd : d ≠ 0) : a / b + c / d = (a * d + b * c) / (b * d) :=
by rw [add_div, mul_div_mul_right _ b hd, hbc.eq, hbd.eq, mul_div_mul_right c d hb]
protected lemma commute.one_div_add_one_div (hab : commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a + 1 / b = (a + b) / (a * b) :=
by rw [(commute.one_right a).div_add_div hab ha hb, one_mul, mul_one, add_comm]
protected lemma commute.inv_add_inv (hab : commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ + b⁻¹ = (a + b) / (a * b) :=
by rw [inv_eq_one_div, inv_eq_one_div, hab.one_div_add_one_div ha hb]
end division_semiring
section division_monoid
variables [division_monoid K] [has_distrib_neg K] {a b : K}
lemma one_div_neg_one_eq_neg_one : (1:K) / (-1) = -1 :=
have (-1) * (-1) = (1:K), by rw [neg_mul_neg, one_mul],
eq.symm (eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right this)
lemma one_div_neg_eq_neg_one_div (a : K) : 1 / (- a) = - (1 / a) :=
calc
1 / (- a) = 1 / ((-1) * a) : by rw neg_eq_neg_one_mul
... = (1 / a) * (1 / (- 1)) : by rw one_div_mul_one_div_rev
... = (1 / a) * (-1) : by rw one_div_neg_one_eq_neg_one
... = - (1 / a) : by rw [mul_neg, mul_one]
lemma div_neg_eq_neg_div (a b : K) : b / (- a) = - (b / a) :=
calc
b / (- a) = b * (1 / (- a)) : by rw [← inv_eq_one_div, division_def]
... = b * -(1 / a) : by rw one_div_neg_eq_neg_one_div
... = -(b * (1 / a)) : by rw neg_mul_eq_mul_neg
... = - (b / a) : by rw mul_one_div
lemma neg_div (a b : K) : (-b) / a = - (b / a) :=
by rw [neg_eq_neg_one_mul, mul_div_assoc, ← neg_eq_neg_one_mul]
@[field_simps] lemma neg_div' (a b : K) : - (b / a) = (-b) / a :=
by simp [neg_div]
lemma neg_div_neg_eq (a b : K) : (-a) / (-b) = a / b :=
by rw [div_neg_eq_neg_div, neg_div, neg_neg]
lemma neg_inv : - a⁻¹ = (- a)⁻¹ :=
by rw [inv_eq_one_div, inv_eq_one_div, div_neg_eq_neg_div]
lemma div_neg (a : K) : a / -b = -(a / b) :=
by rw [← div_neg_eq_neg_div]
lemma inv_neg : (-a)⁻¹ = -(a⁻¹) :=
by rw neg_inv
end division_monoid
section division_ring
variables [division_ring K] {a b c d : K}
@[simp] lemma div_neg_self {a : K} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / -a = -1 :=
by rw [div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self h]
@[simp] lemma neg_div_self {a : K} (h : a ≠ 0) : (-a) / a = -1 :=
by rw [neg_div, div_self h]
lemma div_sub_div_same (a b c : K) : (a / c) - (b / c) = (a - b) / c :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_div, div_add_div_same, sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma same_sub_div {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : (b - a) / b = 1 - a / b :=
by simpa only [← @div_self _ _ b h] using (div_sub_div_same b a b).symm
lemma one_sub_div {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : 1 - a / b = (b - a) / b := (same_sub_div h).symm
lemma div_sub_same {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : (a - b) / b = a / b - 1 :=
by simpa only [← @div_self _ _ b h] using (div_sub_div_same a b b).symm
lemma div_sub_one {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b - 1 = (a - b) / b := (div_sub_same h).symm
lemma sub_div (a b c : K) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
(div_sub_div_same _ _ _).symm
/-- See `inv_sub_inv` for the more convenient version when `K` is commutative. -/
lemma inv_sub_inv' {a b : K} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ - b⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * (b - a) * b⁻¹ :=
by rw [mul_sub, sub_mul, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ hb, inv_mul_cancel ha, one_mul]
lemma one_div_mul_sub_mul_one_div_eq_one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(1 / a) * (b - a) * (1 / b) = 1 / a - 1 / b :=
by rw [(mul_sub_left_distrib (1 / a)), (one_div_mul_cancel ha), mul_sub_right_distrib,
one_mul, mul_assoc, (mul_one_div_cancel hb), mul_one]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance division_ring.is_domain : is_domain K :=
no_zero_divisors.to_is_domain _
protected lemma commute.div_sub_div (hbc : commute b c) (hbd : commute b d) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hd : d ≠ 0) : a / b - c / d = (a * d - b * c) / (b * d) :=
by simpa only [mul_neg, neg_div, ←sub_eq_add_neg] using hbc.neg_right.div_add_div hbd hb hd
protected lemma commute.inv_sub_inv (hab : commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ - b⁻¹ = (b - a) / (a * b) :=
by simp only [inv_eq_one_div, (commute.one_right a).div_sub_div hab ha hb, one_mul, mul_one]
end division_ring
section semifield
variables [semifield α] {a b c d : α}
lemma div_add_div (a : α) (c : α) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) :
(a / b) + (c / d) = ((a * d) + (b * c)) / (b * d) :=
(commute.all b _).div_add_div (commute.all _ _) hb hd
lemma one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : 1 / a + 1 / b = (a + b) / (a * b) :=
(commute.all a _).one_div_add_one_div ha hb
lemma inv_add_inv (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ + b⁻¹ = (a + b) / (a * b) :=
(commute.all a _).inv_add_inv ha hb
end semifield
section field
variable [field K]
local attribute [simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm
@[field_simps] lemma div_sub_div (a : K) {b : K} (c : K) {d : K} (hb : b ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) :
(a / b) - (c / d) = ((a * d) - (b * c)) / (b * d) :=
(commute.all b _).div_sub_div (commute.all _ _) hb hd
lemma inv_sub_inv {a b : K} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ - b⁻¹ = (b - a) / (a * b) :=
(commute.all a _).inv_sub_inv ha hb
@[field_simps] lemma sub_div' (a b c : K) (hc : c ≠ 0) : b - a / c = (b * c - a) / c :=
by simpa using div_sub_div b a one_ne_zero hc
@[field_simps] lemma div_sub' (a b c : K) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c - b = (a - c * b) / c :=
by simpa using div_sub_div a b hc one_ne_zero
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance field.is_domain : is_domain K :=
{ ..division_ring.is_domain }
end field
namespace ring_hom
protected lemma injective [division_ring α] [semiring β] [nontrivial β] (f : α →+* β) :
injective f :=
(injective_iff_map_eq_zero f).2 $ λ x, (map_eq_zero f).1
end ring_hom
section noncomputable_defs
variables {R : Type*} [nontrivial R]
/-- Constructs a `division_ring` structure on a `ring` consisting only of units and 0. -/
noncomputable def division_ring_of_is_unit_or_eq_zero [hR : ring R]
(h : ∀ (a : R), is_unit a ∨ a = 0) : division_ring R :=
{ .. (group_with_zero_of_is_unit_or_eq_zero h), .. hR }
/-- Constructs a `field` structure on a `comm_ring` consisting only of units and 0.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
noncomputable def field_of_is_unit_or_eq_zero [hR : comm_ring R]
(h : ∀ (a : R), is_unit a ∨ a = 0) : field R :=
{ .. (group_with_zero_of_is_unit_or_eq_zero h), .. hR }
end noncomputable_defs
/-- Pullback a `division_semiring` along an injective function. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.division_semiring [division_semiring β] [has_zero α] [has_mul α]
[has_add α] [has_one α] [has_inv α] [has_div α] [has_smul ℕ α] [has_pow α ℕ] [has_pow α ℤ]
[has_nat_cast α]
(f : α → β) (hf : injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(inv : ∀ x, f (x⁻¹) = (f x)⁻¹) (div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y)
(nsmul : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) (zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(nat_cast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) :
division_semiring α :=
{ .. hf.group_with_zero f zero one mul inv div npow zpow,
.. hf.semiring f zero one add mul nsmul npow nat_cast }
/-- Pullback a `division_ring` along an injective function.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def function.injective.division_ring [division_ring K] {K'}
[has_zero K'] [has_one K'] [has_add K'] [has_mul K'] [has_neg K'] [has_sub K'] [has_inv K']
[has_div K'] [has_smul ℕ K'] [has_smul ℤ K'] [has_smul ℚ K'] [has_pow K' ℕ] [has_pow K' ℤ]
[has_nat_cast K'] [has_int_cast K'] [has_rat_cast K']
(f : K' → K) (hf : injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) (sub : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y)
(inv : ∀ x, f (x⁻¹) = (f x)⁻¹) (div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y)
(nsmul : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (n • x) = n • f x) (zsmul : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(qsmul : ∀ x (n : ℚ), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) (zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(nat_cast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) (int_cast : ∀ n : ℤ, f n = n) (rat_cast : ∀ n : ℚ, f n = n) :
division_ring K' :=
{ rat_cast := coe,
rat_cast_mk := λ a b h1 h2, hf (by erw [rat_cast, mul, inv, int_cast, nat_cast];
exact division_ring.rat_cast_mk a b h1 h2),
qsmul := (•),
qsmul_eq_mul' := λ a x, hf (by erw [qsmul, mul, rat.smul_def, rat_cast]),
.. hf.group_with_zero f zero one mul inv div npow zpow,
.. hf.ring f zero one add mul neg sub nsmul zsmul npow nat_cast int_cast }
/-- Pullback a `field` along an injective function. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.semifield [semifield β] [has_zero α] [has_mul α] [has_add α]
[has_one α] [has_inv α] [has_div α] [has_smul ℕ α] [has_pow α ℕ] [has_pow α ℤ]
[has_nat_cast α]
(f : α → β) (hf : injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(inv : ∀ x, f (x⁻¹) = (f x)⁻¹) (div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y)
(nsmul : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) (zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(nat_cast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) :
semifield α :=
{ .. hf.comm_group_with_zero f zero one mul inv div npow zpow,
.. hf.comm_semiring f zero one add mul nsmul npow nat_cast }
/-- Pullback a `field` along an injective function.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def function.injective.field [field K] {K'}
[has_zero K'] [has_mul K'] [has_add K'] [has_neg K'] [has_sub K'] [has_one K'] [has_inv K']
[has_div K'] [has_smul ℕ K'] [has_smul ℤ K'] [has_smul ℚ K'] [has_pow K' ℕ] [has_pow K' ℤ]
[has_nat_cast K'] [has_int_cast K'] [has_rat_cast K']
(f : K' → K) (hf : injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) (sub : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y)
(inv : ∀ x, f (x⁻¹) = (f x)⁻¹) (div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y)
(nsmul : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (n • x) = n • f x) (zsmul : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(qsmul : ∀ x (n : ℚ), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) (zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(nat_cast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) (int_cast : ∀ n : ℤ, f n = n) (rat_cast : ∀ n : ℚ, f n = n) :
field K' :=
{ rat_cast := coe,
rat_cast_mk := λ a b h1 h2, hf (by erw [rat_cast, mul, inv, int_cast, nat_cast];
exact division_ring.rat_cast_mk a b h1 h2),
qsmul := (•),
qsmul_eq_mul' := λ a x, hf (by erw [qsmul, mul, rat.smul_def, rat_cast]),
.. hf.comm_group_with_zero f zero one mul inv div npow zpow,
.. hf.comm_ring f zero one add mul neg sub nsmul zsmul npow nat_cast int_cast }
/-! ### Order dual -/
instance [h : has_rat_cast α] : has_rat_cast αᵒᵈ := h
instance [h : division_semiring α] : division_semiring αᵒᵈ := h
instance [h : division_ring α] : division_ring αᵒᵈ := h
instance [h : semifield α] : semifield αᵒᵈ := h
instance [h : field α] : field αᵒᵈ := h
@[simp] lemma to_dual_rat_cast [has_rat_cast α] (n : ℚ) : to_dual (n : α) = n := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_dual_rat_cast [has_rat_cast α] (n : ℚ) : (of_dual n : α) = n := rfl
/-! ### Lexicographic order -/
instance [h : has_rat_cast α] : has_rat_cast (lex α) := h
instance [h : division_semiring α] : division_semiring (lex α) := h
instance [h : division_ring α] : division_ring (lex α) := h
instance [h : semifield α] : semifield (lex α) := h
instance [h : field α] : field (lex α) := h
@[simp] lemma to_lex_rat_cast [has_rat_cast α] (n : ℚ) : to_lex (n : α) = n := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_lex_rat_cast [has_rat_cast α] (n : ℚ) : (of_lex n : α) = n := rfl
|
25a30cd0e4f5105f9d6bd277a28b220a0871dad7 | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/data/set/basic.lean | 08af3259a3f2e0249e16bdcd031d7145f5ec7bf0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 77,623 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import order.symm_diff
import logic.function.iterate
/-!
# Basic properties of sets
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Sets in Lean are homogeneous; all their elements have the same type. Sets whose elements
have type `X` are thus defined as `set X := X → Prop`. Note that this function need not
be decidable. The definition is in the core library.
This file provides some basic definitions related to sets and functions not present in the core
library, as well as extra lemmas for functions in the core library (empty set, univ, union,
intersection, insert, singleton, set-theoretic difference, complement, and powerset).
Note that a set is a term, not a type. There is a coercion from `set α` to `Type*` sending
`s` to the corresponding subtype `↥s`.
See also the file `set_theory/zfc.lean`, which contains an encoding of ZFC set theory in Lean.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `f : α → β` is a function,
- `s : set α` and `s₁ s₂ : set α` are subsets of `α`
- `t : set β` is a subset of `β`.
Definitions in the file:
* `nonempty s : Prop` : the predicate `s ≠ ∅`. Note that this is the preferred way to express the
fact that `s` has an element (see the Implementation Notes).
* `subsingleton s : Prop` : the predicate saying that `s` has at most one element.
* `nontrivial s : Prop` : the predicate saying that `s` has at least two distinct elements.
* `inclusion s₁ s₂ : ↥s₁ → ↥s₂` : the map `↥s₁ → ↥s₂` induced by an inclusion `s₁ ⊆ s₂`.
## Notation
* `sᶜ` for the complement of `s`
## Implementation notes
* `s.nonempty` is to be preferred to `s ≠ ∅` or `∃ x, x ∈ s`. It has the advantage that
the `s.nonempty` dot notation can be used.
* For `s : set α`, do not use `subtype s`. Instead use `↥s` or `(s : Type*)` or `s`.
## Tags
set, sets, subset, subsets, union, intersection, insert, singleton, complement, powerset
-/
/-! ### Set coercion to a type -/
open function
universes u v w x
namespace set
variables {α : Type*} {s t : set α}
instance : has_le (set α) := ⟨λ s t, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ t⟩
instance : has_subset (set α) := ⟨(≤)⟩
instance {α : Type*} : boolean_algebra (set α) :=
{ sup := λ s t, {x | x ∈ s ∨ x ∈ t},
le := (≤),
lt := λ s t, s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s,
inf := λ s t, {x | x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t},
bot := ∅,
compl := λ s, {x | x ∉ s},
top := univ,
sdiff := λ s t, {x | x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t},
.. (infer_instance : boolean_algebra (α → Prop)) }
instance : has_ssubset (set α) := ⟨(<)⟩
instance : has_union (set α) := ⟨(⊔)⟩
instance : has_inter (set α) := ⟨(⊓)⟩
@[simp] lemma top_eq_univ : (⊤ : set α) = univ := rfl
@[simp] lemma bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : set α) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma sup_eq_union : ((⊔) : set α → set α → set α) = (∪) := rfl
@[simp] lemma inf_eq_inter : ((⊓) : set α → set α → set α) = (∩) := rfl
@[simp] lemma le_eq_subset : ((≤) : set α → set α → Prop) = (⊆) := rfl
@[simp] lemma lt_eq_ssubset : ((<) : set α → set α → Prop) = (⊂) := rfl
lemma le_iff_subset : s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t := iff.rfl
lemma lt_iff_ssubset : s < t ↔ s ⊂ t := iff.rfl
alias le_iff_subset ↔ _root_.has_le.le.subset _root_.has_subset.subset.le
alias lt_iff_ssubset ↔ _root_.has_lt.lt.ssubset _root_.has_ssubset.ssubset.lt
/-- Coercion from a set to the corresponding subtype. -/
instance {α : Type u} : has_coe_to_sort (set α) (Type u) := ⟨λ s, {x // x ∈ s}⟩
instance pi_set_coe.can_lift (ι : Type u) (α : Π i : ι, Type v) [ne : Π i, nonempty (α i)]
(s : set ι) :
can_lift (Π i : s, α i) (Π i, α i) (λ f i, f i) (λ _, true) :=
pi_subtype.can_lift ι α s
instance pi_set_coe.can_lift' (ι : Type u) (α : Type v) [ne : nonempty α] (s : set ι) :
can_lift (s → α) (ι → α) (λ f i, f i) (λ _, true) :=
pi_set_coe.can_lift ι (λ _, α) s
end set
section set_coe
variables {α : Type u}
theorem set.coe_eq_subtype (s : set α) : ↥s = {x // x ∈ s} := rfl
@[simp] theorem set.coe_set_of (p : α → Prop) : ↥{x | p x} = {x // p x} := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_coe.forall {s : set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∀ x : s, p x) ↔ (∀ x (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩) :=
subtype.forall
@[simp] theorem set_coe.exists {s : set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ (∃ x (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩) :=
subtype.exists
theorem set_coe.exists' {s : set α} {p : Π x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∃ x (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ (∃ x : s, p x x.2) :=
(@set_coe.exists _ _ $ λ x, p x.1 x.2).symm
theorem set_coe.forall' {s : set α} {p : Π x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∀ x (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ (∀ x : s, p x x.2) :=
(@set_coe.forall _ _ $ λ x, p x.1 x.2).symm
@[simp] theorem set_coe_cast : ∀ {s t : set α} (H' : s = t) (H : ↥s = ↥t) (x : s),
cast H x = ⟨x.1, H' ▸ x.2⟩
| s _ rfl _ ⟨x, h⟩ := rfl
theorem set_coe.ext {s : set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b → a = b :=
subtype.eq
theorem set_coe.ext_iff {s : set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b ↔ a = b :=
iff.intro set_coe.ext (assume h, h ▸ rfl)
end set_coe
/-- See also `subtype.prop` -/
lemma subtype.mem {α : Type*} {s : set α} (p : s) : (p : α) ∈ s := p.prop
/-- Duplicate of `eq.subset'`, which currently has elaboration problems. -/
lemma eq.subset {α} {s t : set α} : s = t → s ⊆ t := eq.subset'
namespace set
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x} {a b : α} {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : set α}
instance : inhabited (set α) := ⟨∅⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {a b : set α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ a ↔ x ∈ b) : a = b :=
funext (assume x, propext (h x))
theorem ext_iff {s t : set α} : s = t ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨λ h x, by rw h, ext⟩
@[trans] theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {x : α} {s t : set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t := h hx
lemma forall_in_swap {p : α → β → Prop} :
(∀ (a ∈ s) b, p a b) ↔ ∀ b (a ∈ s), p a b :=
by tauto
/-! ### Lemmas about `mem` and `set_of` -/
lemma mem_set_of {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ {x | p x} ↔ p a := iff.rfl
/-- If `h : a ∈ {x | p x}` then `h.out : p x`. These are definitionally equal, but this can
nevertheless be useful for various reasons, e.g. to apply further projection notation or in an
argument to `simp`. -/
lemma _root_.has_mem.mem.out {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (h : a ∈ {x | p x}) : p a := h
theorem nmem_set_of_iff {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∉ {x | p x} ↔ ¬ p a := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem set_of_mem_eq {s : set α} : {x | x ∈ s} = s := rfl
theorem set_of_set {s : set α} : set_of s = s := rfl
lemma set_of_app_iff {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : {x | p x} x ↔ p x := iff.rfl
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a := iff.rfl
lemma set_of_bijective : bijective (set_of : (α → Prop) → set α) := bijective_id
@[simp] theorem set_of_subset_set_of {p q : α → Prop} :
{a | p a} ⊆ {a | q a} ↔ (∀a, p a → q a) := iff.rfl
lemma set_of_and {p q : α → Prop} : {a | p a ∧ q a} = {a | p a} ∩ {a | q a} := rfl
lemma set_of_or {p q : α → Prop} : {a | p a ∨ q a} = {a | p a} ∪ {a | q a} := rfl
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
instance : is_refl (set α) (⊆) := has_le.le.is_refl
instance : is_trans (set α) (⊆) := has_le.le.is_trans
instance : is_antisymm (set α) (⊆) := has_le.le.is_antisymm
instance : is_irrefl (set α) (⊂) := has_lt.lt.is_irrefl
instance : is_trans (set α) (⊂) := has_lt.lt.is_trans
instance : is_asymm (set α) (⊂) := has_lt.lt.is_asymm
instance : is_nonstrict_strict_order (set α) (⊆) (⊂) := ⟨λ _ _, iff.rfl⟩
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
lemma subset_def : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := rfl
lemma ssubset_def : s ⊂ t = (s ⊆ t ∧ ¬ t ⊆ s) := rfl
@[refl] theorem subset.refl (a : set α) : a ⊆ a := assume x, id
theorem subset.rfl {s : set α} : s ⊆ s := subset.refl s
@[trans] theorem subset.trans {a b c : set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c := λ x h, bc $ ab h
@[trans] theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {x y : α} {s : set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
theorem subset.antisymm {a b : set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
set.ext $ λ x, ⟨@h₁ _, @h₂ _⟩
theorem subset.antisymm_iff {a b : set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨λ e, ⟨e.subset, e.symm.subset⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
-- an alternative name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : set α} : a ⊆ b → b ⊆ a → a = b := subset.antisymm
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : set α} {a : α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ := @h _
theorem not_mem_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt $ mem_of_subset_of_mem h
theorem not_subset : (¬ s ⊆ t) ↔ ∃a ∈ s, a ∉ t := by simp only [subset_def, not_forall]
/-! ### Definition of strict subsets `s ⊂ t` and basic properties. -/
protected theorem eq_or_ssubset_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s = t ∨ s ⊂ t :=
eq_or_lt_of_le h
lemma exists_of_ssubset {s t : set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : (∃x∈t, x ∉ s) :=
not_subset.1 h.2
protected lemma ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne (set α) _ s t
lemma ssubset_iff_of_subset {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨exists_of_ssubset, λ ⟨x, hxt, hxs⟩, ⟨h, λ h, hxs $ h hxt⟩⟩
protected lemma ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨subset.trans hs₁s₂.1 hs₂s₃, λ hs₃s₁, hs₁s₂.2 (subset.trans hs₂s₃ hs₃s₁)⟩
protected lemma ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨subset.trans hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃.1, λ hs₃s₁, hs₂s₃.2 (subset.trans hs₃s₁ hs₁s₂)⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬ (x ∈ (∅ : set α)) := id
@[simp] theorem not_not_mem : ¬ (a ∉ s) ↔ a ∈ s := not_not
/-! ### Non-empty sets -/
/-- The property `s.nonempty` expresses the fact that the set `s` is not empty. It should be used
in theorem assumptions instead of `∃ x, x ∈ s` or `s ≠ ∅` as it gives access to a nice API thanks
to the dot notation. -/
protected def nonempty (s : set α) : Prop := ∃ x, x ∈ s
@[simp] lemma nonempty_coe_sort {s : set α} : nonempty ↥s ↔ s.nonempty := nonempty_subtype
alias nonempty_coe_sort ↔ _ nonempty.coe_sort
lemma nonempty_def : s.nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s := iff.rfl
lemma nonempty_of_mem {x} (h : x ∈ s) : s.nonempty := ⟨x, h⟩
theorem nonempty.not_subset_empty : s.nonempty → ¬(s ⊆ ∅)
| ⟨x, hx⟩ hs := hs hx
/-- Extract a witness from `s.nonempty`. This function might be used instead of case analysis
on the argument. Note that it makes a proof depend on the `classical.choice` axiom. -/
protected noncomputable def nonempty.some (h : s.nonempty) : α := classical.some h
protected lemma nonempty.some_mem (h : s.nonempty) : h.some ∈ s := classical.some_spec h
lemma nonempty.mono (ht : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.nonempty) : t.nonempty := hs.imp ht
lemma nonempty_of_not_subset (h : ¬s ⊆ t) : (s \ t).nonempty :=
let ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ := not_subset.1 h in ⟨x, xs, xt⟩
lemma nonempty_of_ssubset (ht : s ⊂ t) : (t \ s).nonempty :=
nonempty_of_not_subset ht.2
lemma nonempty.of_diff (h : (s \ t).nonempty) : s.nonempty := h.imp $ λ _, and.left
lemma nonempty_of_ssubset' (ht : s ⊂ t) : t.nonempty := (nonempty_of_ssubset ht).of_diff
lemma nonempty.inl (hs : s.nonempty) : (s ∪ t).nonempty := hs.imp $ λ _, or.inl
lemma nonempty.inr (ht : t.nonempty) : (s ∪ t).nonempty := ht.imp $ λ _, or.inr
@[simp] lemma union_nonempty : (s ∪ t).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty ∨ t.nonempty := exists_or_distrib
lemma nonempty.left (h : (s ∩ t).nonempty) : s.nonempty := h.imp $ λ _, and.left
lemma nonempty.right (h : (s ∩ t).nonempty) : t.nonempty := h.imp $ λ _, and.right
lemma inter_nonempty : (s ∩ t).nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t := iff.rfl
lemma inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left : (s ∩ t).nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ t :=
by simp_rw [inter_nonempty, exists_prop]
lemma inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right : (s ∩ t).nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∈ s :=
by simp_rw [inter_nonempty, exists_prop, and_comm]
lemma nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty : nonempty α ↔ (univ : set α).nonempty :=
⟨λ ⟨x⟩, ⟨x, trivial⟩, λ ⟨x, _⟩, ⟨x⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma univ_nonempty : ∀ [h : nonempty α], (univ : set α).nonempty
| ⟨x⟩ := ⟨x, trivial⟩
lemma nonempty.to_subtype : s.nonempty → nonempty s := nonempty_subtype.2
lemma nonempty.to_type : s.nonempty → nonempty α := λ ⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨x⟩
instance [nonempty α] : nonempty (set.univ : set α) := set.univ_nonempty.to_subtype
lemma nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype [nonempty s] : s.nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›
/-! ### Lemmas about the empty set -/
theorem empty_def : (∅ : set α) = {x | false} := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_empty_iff_false (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : set α) ↔ false := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem set_of_false : {a : α | false} = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_subset (s : set α) : ∅ ⊆ s.
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
(subset.antisymm_iff.trans $ and_iff_left (empty_subset _)).symm
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s := subset_empty_iff.symm
lemma eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (h : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ := subset_empty_iff.1 h
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ := subset_empty_iff.1
theorem eq_empty_of_is_empty [is_empty α] (s : set α) : s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ λ x hx, is_empty_elim x
/-- There is exactly one set of a type that is empty. -/
instance unique_empty [is_empty α] : unique (set α) :=
{ default := ∅, uniq := eq_empty_of_is_empty }
/-- See also `set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty`. -/
lemma not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : set α} : ¬s.nonempty ↔ s = ∅ :=
by simp only [set.nonempty, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, not_exists]
/-- See also `set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty`. -/
lemma nonempty_iff_ne_empty : s.nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ := not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.not_right
alias nonempty_iff_ne_empty ↔ nonempty.ne_empty _
@[simp] lemma not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : set α).nonempty := λ ⟨x, hx⟩, hx
@[simp] lemma is_empty_coe_sort {s : set α} : is_empty ↥s ↔ s = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 $ by simpa using nonempty_iff_ne_empty
lemma eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : set α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.nonempty :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 $ e ▸ h
theorem ball_empty_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ (∅ : set α), p x) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ x, false.elim
instance (α : Type u) : is_empty.{u+1} (∅ : set α) :=
⟨λ x, x.2⟩
@[simp] lemma empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (set α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias empty_ssubset ↔ _ nonempty.empty_ssubset
/-!
### Universal set.
In Lean `@univ α` (or `univ : set α`) is the set that contains all elements of type `α`.
Mathematically it is the same as `α` but it has a different type.
-/
@[simp] theorem set_of_true : {x : α | true} = univ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_univ (x : α) : x ∈ @univ α := trivial
@[simp] lemma univ_eq_empty_iff : (univ : set α) = ∅ ↔ is_empty α :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans ⟨λ H, ⟨λ x, H x trivial⟩, λ H x _, @is_empty.false α H x⟩
theorem empty_ne_univ [nonempty α] : (∅ : set α) ≠ univ :=
λ e, not_is_empty_of_nonempty α $ univ_eq_empty_iff.1 e.symm
@[simp] theorem subset_univ (s : set α) : s ⊆ univ := λ x H, trivial
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ := @top_le_iff _ _ _ s
alias univ_subset_iff ↔ eq_univ_of_univ_subset _
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
univ_subset_iff.symm.trans $ forall_congr $ λ x, imp_iff_right trivial
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ := eq_univ_iff_forall.2
lemma nonempty.eq_univ [subsingleton α] : s.nonempty → s = univ :=
by { rintro ⟨x, hx⟩, refine eq_univ_of_forall (λ y, by rwa subsingleton.elim y x) }
lemma eq_univ_of_subset {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s = univ) : t = univ :=
eq_univ_of_univ_subset $ hs ▸ h
lemma exists_mem_of_nonempty (α) : ∀ [nonempty α], ∃x:α, x ∈ (univ : set α)
| ⟨x⟩ := ⟨x, trivial⟩
lemma ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem {α : Type*} (s : set α) : s ≠ univ ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s :=
by rw [←not_forall, ←eq_univ_iff_forall]
lemma not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem {α : Type*} {s t : set α} :
¬ s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t :=
by simp [subset_def]
lemma univ_unique [unique α] : @set.univ α = {default} :=
set.ext $ λ x, iff_of_true trivial $ subsingleton.elim x default
lemma ssubset_univ_iff : s ⊂ univ ↔ s ≠ univ := lt_top_iff_ne_top
instance nontrivial_of_nonempty [nonempty α] : nontrivial (set α) := ⟨⟨∅, univ, empty_ne_univ⟩⟩
/-! ### Lemmas about union -/
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = {a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂} := rfl
theorem mem_union_left {x : α} {a : set α} (b : set α) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b := or.inl
theorem mem_union_right {x : α} {b : set α} (a : set α) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b := or.inr
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : α} {a b : set α} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := H
theorem mem_union.elim {x : α} {a b : set α} {P : Prop}
(H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P) (H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
@[simp] theorem mem_union (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ (x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b) := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem union_self (a : set α) : a ∪ a = a := ext $ λ x, or_self _
@[simp] theorem union_empty (a : set α) : a ∪ ∅ = a := ext $ λ x, or_false _
@[simp] theorem empty_union (a : set α) : ∅ ∪ a = a := ext $ λ x, false_or _
theorem union_comm (a b : set α) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a := ext $ λ x, or.comm
theorem union_assoc (a b c : set α) : (a ∪ b) ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) := ext $ λ x, or.assoc
instance union_is_assoc : is_associative (set α) (∪) := ⟨union_assoc⟩
instance union_is_comm : is_commutative (set α) (∪) := ⟨union_comm⟩
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
ext $ λ x, or.left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ s₃ = (s₁ ∪ s₃) ∪ s₂ :=
ext $ λ x, or.right_comm
@[simp] theorem union_eq_left_iff_subset {s t : set α} : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sup_eq_left
@[simp] theorem union_eq_right_iff_subset {s t : set α} : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sup_eq_right
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
union_eq_right_iff_subset.mpr h
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∪ t = s :=
union_eq_left_iff_subset.mpr h
@[simp] theorem subset_union_left (s t : set α) : s ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x, or.inl
@[simp] theorem subset_union_right (s t : set α) : t ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x, or.inr
theorem union_subset {s t r : set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r :=
λ x, or.rec (@sr _) (@tr _)
@[simp] theorem union_subset_iff {s t u : set α} : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(forall_congr (by exact λ x, or_imp_distrib)).trans forall_and_distrib
theorem union_subset_union {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α}
(h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ∪ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ∪ t₂ := λ x, or.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
theorem union_subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : set α} (t) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h subset.rfl
theorem union_subset_union_right (s) {t₁ t₂ : set α} (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union subset.rfl h
lemma subset_union_of_subset_left {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (u : set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
subset.trans h (subset_union_left t u)
lemma subset_union_of_subset_right {s u : set α} (h : s ⊆ u) (t : set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
subset.trans h (subset_union_right t u)
lemma union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ⊔ u := sup_congr_left ht hu
lemma union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u := sup_congr_right hs ht
lemma union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t := sup_eq_sup_iff_left
lemma union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u := sup_eq_sup_iff_right
@[simp] theorem union_empty_iff {s t : set α} : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ :=
by simp only [← subset_empty_iff]; exact union_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma union_univ {s : set α} : s ∪ univ = univ := sup_top_eq
@[simp] lemma univ_union {s : set α} : univ ∪ s = univ := top_sup_eq
/-! ### Lemmas about intersection -/
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = {a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂} := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inter_iff (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ (x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b) := iff.rfl
theorem mem_inter {x : α} {a b : set α} (ha : x ∈ a) (hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b := ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : α} {a b : set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a := h.left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : α} {a b : set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b := h.right
@[simp] theorem inter_self (a : set α) : a ∩ a = a := ext $ λ x, and_self _
@[simp] theorem inter_empty (a : set α) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ := ext $ λ x, and_false _
@[simp] theorem empty_inter (a : set α) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ := ext $ λ x, false_and _
theorem inter_comm (a b : set α) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a := ext $ λ x, and.comm
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : set α) : (a ∩ b) ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) := ext $ λ x, and.assoc
instance inter_is_assoc : is_associative (set α) (∩) := ⟨inter_assoc⟩
instance inter_is_comm : is_commutative (set α) (∩) := ⟨inter_comm⟩
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext $ λ x, and.left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ∩ s₃ = (s₁ ∩ s₃) ∩ s₂ :=
ext $ λ x, and.right_comm
@[simp] theorem inter_subset_left (s t : set α) : s ∩ t ⊆ s := λ x, and.left
@[simp] theorem inter_subset_right (s t : set α) : s ∩ t ⊆ t := λ x, and.right
theorem subset_inter {s t r : set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t := λ x h, ⟨rs h, rt h⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_inter_iff {s t r : set α} : r ⊆ s ∩ t ↔ r ⊆ s ∧ r ⊆ t :=
(forall_congr (by exact λ x, imp_and_distrib)).trans forall_and_distrib
@[simp] theorem inter_eq_left_iff_subset {s t : set α} : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_left
@[simp] theorem inter_eq_right_iff_subset {s t : set α} : s ∩ t = t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
inf_eq_right
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : set α} : s ⊆ t → s ∩ t = s :=
inter_eq_left_iff_subset.mpr
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : set α} : t ⊆ s → s ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_right_iff_subset.mpr
lemma inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u := inf_congr_left ht hu
lemma inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u := inf_congr_right hs ht
lemma inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u := inf_eq_inf_iff_left
lemma inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t := inf_eq_inf_iff_right
@[simp] theorem inter_univ (a : set α) : a ∩ univ = a := inf_top_eq
@[simp] theorem univ_inter (a : set α) : univ ∩ a = a := top_inf_eq
theorem inter_subset_inter {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α}
(h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂ := λ x, and.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : set α} (u : set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter H subset.rfl
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : set α} (u : set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
inter_subset_inter subset.rfl H
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right $ subset_union_left _ _
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right $ subset_union_right _ _
lemma inter_set_of_eq_sep (s : set α) (p : α → Prop) : s ∩ {a | p a} = {a ∈ s | p a} := rfl
lemma set_of_inter_eq_sep (p : α → Prop) (s : set α) : {a | p a} ∩ s = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
inter_comm _ _
/-! ### Distributivity laws -/
theorem inter_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sup_left
theorem inter_union_distrib_left {s t u : set α} : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sup_left
theorem inter_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∪ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sup_right
theorem union_inter_distrib_right {s t u : set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∪ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sup_right
theorem union_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∪ (t ∩ u) = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left
theorem union_inter_distrib_left {s t u : set α} : s ∪ (t ∩ u) = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left
theorem union_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : (s ∩ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right
theorem inter_union_distrib_right {s t u : set α} : (s ∩ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right
lemma union_union_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = (s ∪ t) ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
lemma union_union_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : (s ∪ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
lemma inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = (s ∩ t) ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
lemma inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : (s ∩ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
lemma union_union_union_comm (s t u v : set α) : (s ∪ t) ∪ (u ∪ v) = (s ∪ u) ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
lemma inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : set α) : (s ∩ t) ∩ (u ∩ v) = (s ∩ u) ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
/-!
### Lemmas about `insert`
`insert α s` is the set `{α} ∪ s`.
-/
theorem insert_def (x : α) (s : set α) : insert x s = { y | y = x ∨ y ∈ s } := rfl
@[simp] theorem subset_insert (x : α) (s : set α) : s ⊆ insert x s := λ y, or.inr
theorem mem_insert (x : α) (s : set α) : x ∈ insert x s := or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {x : α} {s : set α} (y : α) : x ∈ s → x ∈ insert y s := or.inr
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {x a : α} {s : set α} : x ∈ insert a s → x = a ∨ x ∈ s := id
lemma mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne : b ∈ insert a s → b ≠ a → b ∈ s := or.resolve_left
lemma eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert : b ∈ insert a s → b ∉ s → b = a := or.resolve_right
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {x a : α} {s : set α} : x ∈ insert a s ↔ x = a ∨ x ∈ s := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
ext $ λ x, or_iff_right_of_imp $ λ e, e.symm ▸ h
lemma ne_insert_of_not_mem {s : set α} (t : set α) {a : α} : a ∉ s → s ≠ insert a t :=
mt $ λ e, e.symm ▸ mem_insert _ _
@[simp] lemma insert_eq_self : insert a s = s ↔ a ∈ s := ⟨λ h, h ▸ mem_insert _ _, insert_eq_of_mem⟩
lemma insert_ne_self : insert a s ≠ s ↔ a ∉ s := insert_eq_self.not
theorem insert_subset : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ (a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t) :=
by simp only [subset_def, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq, mem_insert_iff]
theorem insert_subset_insert (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t := λ x, or.imp_right (@h _)
theorem insert_subset_insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h x hx, _, insert_subset_insert⟩,
rcases h (subset_insert _ _ hx) with (rfl|hxt),
exacts [(ha hx).elim, hxt]
end
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
forall₂_congr $ λ b hb, or_iff_right $ ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha
theorem ssubset_iff_insert {s t : set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t :=
begin
simp only [insert_subset, exists_and_distrib_right, ssubset_def, not_subset],
simp only [exists_prop, and_comm]
end
theorem ssubset_insert {s : set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_insert.2 ⟨a, h, subset.rfl⟩
theorem insert_comm (a b : α) (s : set α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext $ λ x, or.left_comm
@[simp] lemma insert_idem (a : α) (s : set α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
insert_eq_of_mem $ mem_insert _ _
theorem insert_union : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) := ext $ λ x, or.assoc
@[simp] theorem union_insert : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) := ext $ λ x, or.left_comm
@[simp] theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : set α) : (insert a s).nonempty := ⟨a, mem_insert a s⟩
instance (a : α) (s : set α) : nonempty (insert a s : set α) := (insert_nonempty a s).to_subtype
lemma insert_inter_distrib (a : α) (s t : set α) : insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t :=
ext $ λ y, or_and_distrib_left
lemma insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : set α) : insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t :=
ext $ λ _, or_or_distrib_left _ _ _
lemma insert_inj (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s = insert b s ↔ a = b :=
⟨λ h, eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (h.subst $ mem_insert a s) ha, congr_arg _⟩
-- useful in proofs by induction
theorem forall_of_forall_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α}
(H : ∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → P x) (x) (h : x ∈ s) : P x := H _ (or.inr h)
theorem forall_insert_of_forall {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α}
(H : ∀ x, x ∈ s → P x) (ha : P a) (x) (h : x ∈ insert a s) : P x :=
h.elim (λ e, e.symm ▸ ha) (H _)
theorem bex_insert_iff {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α} :
(∃ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ P a ∨ (∃ x ∈ s, P x) :=
bex_or_left_distrib.trans $ or_congr_left' bex_eq_left
theorem ball_insert_iff {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α} :
(∀ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ P a ∧ (∀x ∈ s, P x) :=
ball_or_left_distrib.trans $ and_congr_left' forall_eq
/-! ### Lemmas about singletons -/
theorem singleton_def (a : α) : ({a} : set α) = insert a ∅ := (insert_emptyc_eq _).symm
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton_iff {a b : α} : a ∈ ({b} : set α) ↔ a = b := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma set_of_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : {n | n = a} = {a} := rfl
@[simp] lemma set_of_eq_eq_singleton' {a : α} : {x | a = x} = {a} := ext $ λ x, eq_comm
-- TODO: again, annotation needed
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : set α) := @rfl _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : set α)) : x = y := h
@[simp] theorem singleton_eq_singleton_iff {x y : α} : {x} = ({y} : set α) ↔ x = y :=
ext_iff.trans eq_iff_eq_cancel_left
lemma singleton_injective : injective (singleton : α → set α) :=
λ _ _, singleton_eq_singleton_iff.mp
theorem mem_singleton_of_eq {x y : α} (H : x = y) : x ∈ ({y} : set α) := H
theorem insert_eq (x : α) (s : set α) : insert x s = ({x} : set α) ∪ s := rfl
@[simp] theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : set α).nonempty :=
⟨a, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : set α) ≠ ∅ := (singleton_nonempty _).ne_empty
@[simp] lemma empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : set α) ⊂ {a} := (singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
@[simp] theorem singleton_subset_iff {a : α} {s : set α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := forall_eq
lemma singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : set α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
theorem set_compr_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : {b | b = a} = {a} := rfl
@[simp] theorem singleton_union : {a} ∪ s = insert a s := rfl
@[simp] theorem union_singleton : s ∪ {a} = insert a s := union_comm _ _
@[simp] theorem singleton_inter_nonempty : ({a} ∩ s).nonempty ↔ a ∈ s :=
by simp only [set.nonempty, mem_inter_iff, mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_left]
@[simp] theorem inter_singleton_nonempty : (s ∩ {a}).nonempty ↔ a ∈ s :=
by rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_nonempty]
@[simp] theorem singleton_inter_eq_empty : {a} ∩ s = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans singleton_inter_nonempty.not
@[simp] theorem inter_singleton_eq_empty : s ∩ {a} = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
by rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_eq_empty]
lemma nmem_singleton_empty {s : set α} : s ∉ ({∅} : set (set α)) ↔ s.nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
instance unique_singleton (a : α) : unique ↥({a} : set α) :=
⟨⟨⟨a, mem_singleton a⟩⟩, λ ⟨x, h⟩, subtype.eq h⟩
lemma eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
subset.antisymm_iff.trans $ and.comm.trans $ and_congr_left' singleton_subset_iff
lemma eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem : s = {a} ↔ s.nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.trans $ and_congr_left $ λ H, ⟨λ h', ⟨_, h'⟩, λ ⟨x, h⟩, H x h ▸ h⟩
-- while `simp` is capable of proving this, it is not capable of turning the LHS into the RHS.
@[simp] lemma default_coe_singleton (x : α) : (default : ({x} : set α)) = ⟨x, rfl⟩ := rfl
/-! ### Lemmas about pairs -/
@[simp] theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : set α) = {a} := union_self _
theorem pair_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : set α) = {b, a} := union_comm _ _
lemma pair_eq_pair_iff {x y z w : α} :
({x, y} : set α) = {z, w} ↔ x = z ∧ y = w ∨ x = w ∧ y = z :=
begin
simp only [set.subset.antisymm_iff, set.insert_subset, set.mem_insert_iff, set.mem_singleton_iff,
set.singleton_subset_iff],
split,
{ tauto! },
{ rintro (⟨rfl,rfl⟩|⟨rfl,rfl⟩); simp }
end
/-! ### Lemmas about sets defined as `{x ∈ s | p x}`. -/
section sep
variables {p q : α → Prop} {x : α}
theorem mem_sep (xs : x ∈ s) (px : p x) : x ∈ {x ∈ s | p x} := ⟨xs, px⟩
@[simp] theorem sep_mem_eq : {x ∈ s | x ∈ t} = s ∩ t := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_sep_iff : x ∈ {x ∈ s | p x} ↔ x ∈ s ∧ p x := iff.rfl
theorem sep_ext_iff : {x ∈ s | p x} = {x ∈ s | q x} ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, (p x ↔ q x) :=
by simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and.congr_right_iff]
theorem sep_eq_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : {x ∈ t | x ∈ s} = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h
@[simp] theorem sep_subset (s : set α) (p : α → Prop) : {x ∈ s | p x} ⊆ s := λ x, and.left
@[simp] lemma sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true : {x ∈ s | p x} = s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
by simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
@[simp] lemma sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false : {x ∈ s | p x} = ∅ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ p x :=
by simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_and]
@[simp] lemma sep_true : {x ∈ s | true} = s := inter_univ s
@[simp] lemma sep_false : {x ∈ s | false} = ∅ := inter_empty s
@[simp] lemma sep_empty (p : α → Prop) : {x ∈ (∅ : set α) | p x} = ∅ := empty_inter p
@[simp] lemma sep_univ : {x ∈ (univ : set α) | p x} = {x | p x} := univ_inter p
@[simp] lemma sep_union : {x ∈ s ∪ t | p x} = {x ∈ s | p x} ∪ {x ∈ t | p x} :=
union_inter_distrib_right
@[simp] lemma sep_inter : {x ∈ s ∩ t | p x} = {x ∈ s | p x} ∩ {x ∈ t | p x} :=
inter_inter_distrib_right s t p
@[simp] lemma sep_and : {x ∈ s | p x ∧ q x} = {x ∈ s | p x} ∩ {x ∈ s | q x} :=
inter_inter_distrib_left s p q
@[simp] lemma sep_or : {x ∈ s | p x ∨ q x} = {x ∈ s | p x} ∪ {x ∈ s | q x} :=
inter_union_distrib_left
@[simp] lemma sep_set_of : {x ∈ {y | p y} | q x} = {x | p x ∧ q x} := rfl
end sep
@[simp] lemma subset_singleton_iff {α : Type*} {s : set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, y = x :=
iff.rfl
lemma subset_singleton_iff_eq {s : set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {x} :=
begin
obtain (rfl | hs) := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty,
use ⟨λ _, or.inl rfl, λ _, empty_subset _⟩,
simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, hs, hs.ne_empty],
end
lemma nonempty.subset_singleton_iff (h : s.nonempty) : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff_eq.trans $ or_iff_right h.ne_empty
lemma ssubset_singleton_iff {s : set α} {x : α} : s ⊂ {x} ↔ s = ∅ :=
begin
rw [ssubset_iff_subset_ne, subset_singleton_iff_eq, or_and_distrib_right, and_not_self, or_false,
and_iff_left_iff_imp],
exact λ h, ne_of_eq_of_ne h (singleton_ne_empty _).symm,
end
lemma eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : set α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
/-! ### Disjointness -/
protected theorem disjoint_iff : disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t ⊆ ∅ := disjoint_iff_inf_le
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty : disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
lemma _root_.disjoint.inter_eq : disjoint s t → s ∩ t = ∅ := disjoint.eq_bot
lemma disjoint_left : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.trans $ forall_congr $ λ _, not_and
lemma disjoint_right : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t → a ∉ s := by rw [disjoint.comm, disjoint_left]
lemma not_disjoint_iff : ¬disjoint s t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
set.disjoint_iff.not.trans $ not_forall.trans $ exists_congr $ λ x, not_not
lemma not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).nonempty := not_disjoint_iff
alias not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter ↔ _ nonempty.not_disjoint
lemma disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : set α) : disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).nonempty :=
(em _).imp_right not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter.mp
lemma disjoint_iff_forall_ne : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), x ≠ y :=
by simp only [ne.def, disjoint_left, @imp_not_comm _ (_ = _), forall_eq']
lemma _root_.disjoint.ne_of_mem (h : disjoint s t) {x y} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ t) : x ≠ y :=
disjoint_iff_forall_ne.mp h x hx y hy
lemma disjoint_of_subset_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h : disjoint s₂ t) : disjoint s₁ t := h.mono_left hs
lemma disjoint_of_subset_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (h : disjoint s t₂) : disjoint s t₁ := h.mono_right ht
lemma disjoint_of_subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (h : disjoint s₂ t₂) : disjoint s₁ t₁ :=
h.mono hs ht
@[simp] lemma disjoint_union_left : disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ disjoint s u ∧ disjoint t u :=
disjoint_sup_left
@[simp] lemma disjoint_union_right : disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ disjoint s t ∧ disjoint s u :=
disjoint_sup_right
@[simp] lemma disjoint_empty (s : set α) : disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right
@[simp] lemma empty_disjoint (s : set α) : disjoint ∅ s := disjoint_bot_left
@[simp] lemma univ_disjoint : disjoint univ s ↔ s = ∅ := top_disjoint
@[simp] lemma disjoint_univ : disjoint s univ ↔ s = ∅ := disjoint_top
lemma disjoint_sdiff_left : disjoint (t \ s) s := disjoint_sdiff_self_left
lemma disjoint_sdiff_right : disjoint s (t \ s) := disjoint_sdiff_self_right
lemma diff_union_diff_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (hut : u ⊆ t) : s \ t ∪ t \ u = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel hts hut
lemma diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union (h : u ⊆ s) : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ u := sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup h
@[simp] lemma disjoint_singleton_left : disjoint {a} s ↔ a ∉ s :=
by simp [set.disjoint_iff, subset_def]; exact iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma disjoint_singleton_right : disjoint s {a} ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint.comm.trans disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma disjoint_singleton : disjoint ({a} : set α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b :=
by rw [disjoint_singleton_left, mem_singleton_iff]
lemma subset_diff : s ⊆ t \ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ disjoint s u := le_iff_subset.symm.trans le_sdiff
lemma inter_diff_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = (s ∩ t) \ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_left _ _ _
lemma inter_diff_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : s \ t ∩ u = (s ∩ u) \ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_right _ _ _
/-! ### Lemmas about complement -/
lemma compl_def (s : set α) : sᶜ = {x | x ∉ s} := rfl
theorem mem_compl {s : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) : x ∈ sᶜ := h
lemma compl_set_of {α} (p : α → Prop) : {a | p a}ᶜ = { a | ¬ p a } := rfl
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ sᶜ) : x ∉ s := h
@[simp] theorem mem_compl_iff (s : set α) (x : α) : x ∈ sᶜ ↔ (x ∉ s) := iff.rfl
lemma not_mem_compl_iff {x : α} : x ∉ sᶜ ↔ x ∈ s := not_not
@[simp] theorem inter_compl_self (s : set α) : s ∩ sᶜ = ∅ := inf_compl_eq_bot
@[simp] theorem compl_inter_self (s : set α) : sᶜ ∩ s = ∅ := compl_inf_eq_bot
@[simp] theorem compl_empty : (∅ : set α)ᶜ = univ := compl_bot
@[simp] theorem compl_union (s t : set α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∩ tᶜ := compl_sup
theorem compl_inter (s t : set α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∪ tᶜ := compl_inf
@[simp] theorem compl_univ : (univ : set α)ᶜ = ∅ := compl_top
@[simp] lemma compl_empty_iff {s : set α} : sᶜ = ∅ ↔ s = univ := compl_eq_bot
@[simp] lemma compl_univ_iff {s : set α} : sᶜ = univ ↔ s = ∅ := compl_eq_top
lemma compl_ne_univ : sᶜ ≠ univ ↔ s.nonempty := compl_univ_iff.not.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
lemma nonempty_compl : sᶜ.nonempty ↔ s ≠ univ := (ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem s).symm
lemma mem_compl_singleton_iff {a x : α} : x ∈ ({a} : set α)ᶜ ↔ x ≠ a := iff.rfl
lemma compl_singleton_eq (a : α) : ({a} : set α)ᶜ = {x | x ≠ a} := rfl
@[simp] lemma compl_ne_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({x | x ≠ a} : set α)ᶜ = {a} := compl_compl _
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : set α) : s ∪ t = (sᶜ ∩ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext $ λ x, or_iff_not_and_not
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : set α) : s ∩ t = (sᶜ ∪ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext $ λ x, and_iff_not_or_not
@[simp] theorem union_compl_self (s : set α) : s ∪ sᶜ = univ := eq_univ_iff_forall.2 $ λ x, em _
@[simp] theorem compl_union_self (s : set α) : sᶜ ∪ s = univ := by rw [union_comm, union_compl_self]
lemma compl_subset_comm : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ tᶜ ⊆ s := @compl_le_iff_compl_le _ s _ _
lemma subset_compl_comm : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ sᶜ := @le_compl_iff_le_compl _ _ _ t
@[simp] lemma compl_subset_compl : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ s := @compl_le_compl_iff_le (set α) _ _ _
lemma subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ disjoint t s :=
@le_compl_iff_disjoint_left (set α) _ _ _
lemma subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ disjoint s t :=
@le_compl_iff_disjoint_right (set α) _ _ _
lemma disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset : disjoint sᶜ t ↔ t ⊆ s := disjoint_compl_left_iff
lemma disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset : disjoint s tᶜ ↔ s ⊆ t := disjoint_compl_right_iff
alias subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right ↔ _ _root_.disjoint.subset_compl_right
alias subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left ↔ _ _root_.disjoint.subset_compl_left
alias disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset ↔ _ _root_.has_subset.subset.disjoint_compl_left
alias disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset ↔ _ _root_.has_subset.subset.disjoint_compl_right
theorem subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset {s t u : set α} : s ⊆ t ∪ uᶜ ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
(@is_compl_compl _ u _).le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le
theorem compl_subset_iff_union {s t : set α} : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ s ∪ t = univ :=
iff.symm $ eq_univ_iff_forall.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a, or_iff_not_imp_left
@[simp] lemma subset_compl_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : set α} : s ⊆ {a}ᶜ ↔ a ∉ s :=
subset_compl_comm.trans singleton_subset_iff
theorem inter_subset (a b c : set α) : a ∩ b ⊆ c ↔ a ⊆ bᶜ ∪ c :=
forall_congr $ λ x, and_imp.trans $ imp_congr_right $ λ _, imp_iff_not_or
lemma inter_compl_nonempty_iff {s t : set α} : (s ∩ tᶜ).nonempty ↔ ¬ s ⊆ t :=
(not_subset.trans $ exists_congr $ by exact λ x, by simp [mem_compl]).symm
/-! ### Lemmas about set difference -/
theorem diff_eq (s t : set α) : s \ t = s ∩ tᶜ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_diff {s t : set α} (x : α) : x ∈ s \ t ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := iff.rfl
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {s t : set α} {x : α} (h1 : x ∈ s) (h2 : x ∉ t) : x ∈ s \ t :=
⟨h1, h2⟩
lemma not_mem_diff_of_mem {s t : set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ t) : x ∉ s \ t :=
λ h, h.2 hx
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
h.left
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
h.right
theorem diff_eq_compl_inter {s t : set α} : s \ t = tᶜ ∩ s :=
by rw [diff_eq, inter_comm]
theorem nonempty_diff {s t : set α} : (s \ t).nonempty ↔ ¬ (s ⊆ t) := inter_compl_nonempty_iff
theorem diff_subset (s t : set α) : s \ t ⊆ s := show s \ t ≤ s, from sdiff_le
theorem union_diff_cancel' {s t u : set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ⊆ u) : t ∪ (u \ s) = u :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' h₁ h₂
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ (t \ s) = t :=
sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
theorem union_diff_cancel_left {s t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left $ disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
theorem union_diff_cancel_right {s t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right $ disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
@[simp] theorem union_diff_left {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
@[simp] theorem union_diff_right {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
theorem union_diff_distrib {s t u : set α} : (s ∪ t) \ u = s \ u ∪ t \ u :=
sup_sdiff
theorem inter_diff_assoc (a b c : set α) : (a ∩ b) \ c = a ∩ (b \ c) :=
inf_sdiff_assoc
@[simp] theorem inter_diff_self (a b : set α) : a ∩ (b \ a) = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_right
@[simp] theorem inter_union_diff (s t : set α) : (s ∩ t) ∪ (s \ t) = s :=
sup_inf_sdiff s t
@[simp] lemma diff_union_inter (s t : set α) : (s \ t) ∪ (s ∩ t) = s :=
by { rw union_comm, exact sup_inf_sdiff _ _ }
@[simp] theorem inter_union_compl (s t : set α) : (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ tᶜ) = s := inter_union_diff _ _
theorem diff_subset_diff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₂ ⊆ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \ t₂ :=
show s₁ ≤ s₂ → t₂ ≤ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ≤ s₂ \ t₂, from sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem diff_subset_diff_left {s₁ s₂ t : set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ \ t ⊆ s₂ \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_right ‹s₁ ≤ s₂›
theorem diff_subset_diff_right {s t u : set α} (h : t ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ s \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_left ‹t ≤ u›
theorem compl_eq_univ_diff (s : set α) : sᶜ = univ \ s :=
top_sdiff.symm
@[simp] lemma empty_diff (s : set α) : (∅ \ s : set α) = ∅ :=
bot_sdiff
theorem diff_eq_empty {s t : set α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp] theorem diff_empty {s : set α} : s \ ∅ = s :=
sdiff_bot
@[simp] lemma diff_univ (s : set α) : s \ univ = ∅ := diff_eq_empty.2 (subset_univ s)
theorem diff_diff {u : set α} : s \ t \ u = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sdiff_left
-- the following statement contains parentheses to help the reader
lemma diff_diff_comm {s t u : set α} : (s \ t) \ u = (s \ u) \ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_comm
lemma diff_subset_iff {s t u : set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ t ∪ u, from sdiff_le_iff
lemma subset_diff_union (s t : set α) : s ⊆ (s \ t) ∪ t :=
show s ≤ (s \ t) ∪ t, from le_sdiff_sup
lemma diff_union_of_subset {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) :
(s \ t) ∪ t = s :=
subset.antisymm (union_subset (diff_subset _ _) h) (subset_diff_union _ _)
@[simp] lemma diff_singleton_subset_iff {x : α} {s t : set α} : s \ {x} ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ insert x t :=
by { rw [←union_singleton, union_comm], apply diff_subset_iff }
lemma subset_diff_singleton {x : α} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hx : x ∉ s) : s ⊆ t \ {x} :=
subset_inter h $ subset_compl_comm.1 $ singleton_subset_iff.2 hx
lemma subset_insert_diff_singleton (x : α) (s : set α) : s ⊆ insert x (s \ {x}) :=
by rw [←diff_singleton_subset_iff]
lemma diff_subset_comm {s t u : set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s \ u ⊆ t :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s \ u ≤ t, from sdiff_le_comm
lemma diff_inter {s t u : set α} : s \ (t ∩ u) = (s \ t) ∪ (s \ u) :=
sdiff_inf
lemma diff_inter_diff {s t u : set α} : s \ t ∩ (s \ u) = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sup.symm
lemma diff_compl : s \ tᶜ = s ∩ t := sdiff_compl
lemma diff_diff_right {s t u : set α} : s \ (t \ u) = (s \ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) :=
sdiff_sdiff_right'
@[simp] theorem insert_diff_of_mem (s) (h : a ∈ t) : insert a s \ t = s \ t :=
by { ext, split; simp [or_imp_distrib, h] {contextual := tt} }
theorem insert_diff_of_not_mem (s) (h : a ∉ t) : insert a s \ t = insert a (s \ t) :=
begin
classical,
ext x,
by_cases h' : x ∈ t,
{ have : x ≠ a,
{ assume H,
rw H at h',
exact h h' },
simp [h, h', this] },
{ simp [h, h'] }
end
lemma insert_diff_self_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∉ s) :
insert a s \ {a} = s :=
by { ext, simp [and_iff_left_of_imp (λ hx : x ∈ s, show x ≠ a, from λ hxa, h $ hxa ▸ hx)] }
@[simp] lemma insert_diff_eq_singleton {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∉ s) :
insert a s \ s = {a} :=
begin
ext,
rw [set.mem_diff, set.mem_insert_iff, set.mem_singleton_iff, or_and_distrib_right,
and_not_self, or_false, and_iff_left_iff_imp],
rintro rfl,
exact h,
end
lemma inter_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : s ∩ insert a t = insert a (s ∩ t) :=
by rw [insert_inter_distrib, insert_eq_of_mem h]
lemma insert_inter_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : insert a s ∩ t = insert a (s ∩ t) :=
by rw [insert_inter_distrib, insert_eq_of_mem h]
lemma inter_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ∩ insert a t = s ∩ t :=
ext $ λ x, and_congr_right $ λ hx, or_iff_right $ ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
lemma insert_inter_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ t) : insert a s ∩ t = s ∩ t :=
ext $ λ x, and_congr_left $ λ hx, or_iff_right $ ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
@[simp] lemma union_diff_self {s t : set α} : s ∪ (t \ s) = s ∪ t := sup_sdiff_self _ _
@[simp] lemma diff_union_self {s t : set α} : (s \ t) ∪ t = s ∪ t := sdiff_sup_self _ _
@[simp] theorem diff_inter_self {a b : set α} : (b \ a) ∩ a = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_left
@[simp] theorem diff_inter_self_eq_diff {s t : set α} : s \ (t ∩ s) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_right _ _
@[simp] theorem diff_self_inter {s t : set α} : s \ (s ∩ t) = s \ t := sdiff_inf_self_left _ _
@[simp] theorem diff_singleton_eq_self {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∉ s) : s \ {a} = s :=
sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint.2 $ by simp [h]
@[simp] lemma diff_singleton_ssubset {s : set α} {a : α} : s \ {a} ⊂ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
sdiff_le.lt_iff_ne.trans $ sdiff_eq_left.not.trans $ by simp
@[simp] theorem insert_diff_singleton {a : α} {s : set α} :
insert a (s \ {a}) = insert a s :=
by simp [insert_eq, union_diff_self, -union_singleton, -singleton_union]
lemma insert_diff_singleton_comm (hab : a ≠ b) (s : set α) :
insert a (s \ {b}) = insert a s \ {b} :=
by simp_rw [←union_singleton, union_diff_distrib,
diff_singleton_eq_self (mem_singleton_iff.not.2 hab.symm)]
@[simp] lemma diff_self {s : set α} : s \ s = ∅ := sdiff_self
lemma diff_diff_right_self (s t : set α) : s \ (s \ t) = s ∩ t := sdiff_sdiff_right_self
lemma diff_diff_cancel_left {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : t \ (t \ s) = s :=
sdiff_sdiff_eq_self h
lemma mem_diff_singleton {x y : α} {s : set α} : x ∈ s \ {y} ↔ (x ∈ s ∧ x ≠ y) :=
iff.rfl
lemma mem_diff_singleton_empty {t : set (set α)} : s ∈ t \ {∅} ↔ s ∈ t ∧ s.nonempty :=
mem_diff_singleton.trans $ and_congr_right' nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
lemma union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter (s t : set α) :
s ∪ t = (s \ t) ∪ (t \ s) ∪ (s ∩ t) :=
sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf
/-! ### Symmetric difference -/
lemma mem_symm_diff : a ∈ s ∆ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t ∨ a ∈ t ∧ a ∉ s := iff.rfl
protected lemma symm_diff_def (s t : set α) : s ∆ t = s \ t ∪ t \ s := rfl
lemma symm_diff_subset_union : s ∆ t ⊆ s ∪ t := @symm_diff_le_sup (set α) _ _ _
@[simp] lemma symm_diff_eq_empty : s ∆ t = ∅ ↔ s = t := symm_diff_eq_bot
@[simp] lemma symm_diff_nonempty : (s ∆ t).nonempty ↔ s ≠ t :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans symm_diff_eq_empty.not
lemma inter_symm_diff_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∩ t ∆ u = (s ∩ t) ∆ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_symm_diff_distrib_left _ _ _
lemma inter_symm_diff_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : s ∆ t ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∆ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_symm_diff_distrib_right _ _ _
lemma subset_symm_diff_union_symm_diff_left (h : disjoint s t) : u ⊆ s ∆ u ∪ t ∆ u :=
h.le_symm_diff_sup_symm_diff_left
lemma subset_symm_diff_union_symm_diff_right (h : disjoint t u) : s ⊆ s ∆ t ∪ s ∆ u :=
h.le_symm_diff_sup_symm_diff_right
/-! ### Powerset -/
/-- `𝒫 s = set.powerset s` is the set of all subsets of `s`. -/
def powerset (s : set α) : set (set α) := {t | t ⊆ s}
prefix `𝒫`:100 := powerset
theorem mem_powerset {x s : set α} (h : x ⊆ s) : x ∈ 𝒫 s := h
theorem subset_of_mem_powerset {x s : set α} (h : x ∈ 𝒫 s) : x ⊆ s := h
@[simp] theorem mem_powerset_iff (x s : set α) : x ∈ 𝒫 s ↔ x ⊆ s := iff.rfl
theorem powerset_inter (s t : set α) : 𝒫 (s ∩ t) = 𝒫 s ∩ 𝒫 t :=
ext $ λ u, subset_inter_iff
@[simp] theorem powerset_mono : 𝒫 s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨λ h, h (subset.refl s), λ h u hu, subset.trans hu h⟩
theorem monotone_powerset : monotone (powerset : set α → set (set α)) :=
λ s t, powerset_mono.2
@[simp] theorem powerset_nonempty : (𝒫 s).nonempty :=
⟨∅, empty_subset s⟩
@[simp] theorem powerset_empty : 𝒫 (∅ : set α) = {∅} :=
ext $ λ s, subset_empty_iff
@[simp] theorem powerset_univ : 𝒫 (univ : set α) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall subset_univ
/-- The powerset of a singleton contains only `∅` and the singleton itself. -/
theorem powerset_singleton (x : α) : 𝒫 ({x} : set α) = {∅, {x}} :=
by { ext y, rw [mem_powerset_iff, subset_singleton_iff_eq, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] }
/-! ### Sets defined as an if-then-else -/
lemma mem_dite_univ_right (p : Prop) [decidable p] (t : p → set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then t h else univ) ↔ (∀ h : p, x ∈ t h) :=
by split_ifs; simp [h]
@[simp] lemma mem_ite_univ_right (p : Prop) [decidable p] (t : set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p t set.univ ↔ (p → x ∈ t) :=
mem_dite_univ_right p (λ _, t) x
lemma mem_dite_univ_left (p : Prop) [decidable p] (t : ¬ p → set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then univ else t h) ↔ (∀ h : ¬ p, x ∈ t h) :=
by split_ifs; simp [h]
@[simp] lemma mem_ite_univ_left (p : Prop) [decidable p] (t : set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p set.univ t ↔ (¬ p → x ∈ t) :=
mem_dite_univ_left p (λ _, t) x
lemma mem_dite_empty_right (p : Prop) [decidable p] (t : p → set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then t h else ∅) ↔ (∃ h : p, x ∈ t h) :=
by split_ifs; simp [h]
@[simp] lemma mem_ite_empty_right (p : Prop) [decidable p] (t : set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p t ∅ ↔ p ∧ x ∈ t :=
by split_ifs; simp [h]
lemma mem_dite_empty_left (p : Prop) [decidable p] (t : ¬ p → set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then ∅ else t h) ↔ (∃ h : ¬ p, x ∈ t h) :=
by split_ifs; simp [h]
@[simp] lemma mem_ite_empty_left (p : Prop) [decidable p] (t : set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p ∅ t ↔ ¬ p ∧ x ∈ t :=
by split_ifs; simp [h]
/-! ### If-then-else for sets -/
/-- `ite` for sets: `set.ite t s s' ∩ t = s ∩ t`, `set.ite t s s' ∩ tᶜ = s' ∩ tᶜ`.
Defined as `s ∩ t ∪ s' \ t`. -/
protected def ite (t s s' : set α) : set α := s ∩ t ∪ s' \ t
@[simp] lemma ite_inter_self (t s s' : set α) : t.ite s s' ∩ t = s ∩ t :=
by rw [set.ite, union_inter_distrib_right, diff_inter_self, inter_assoc, inter_self, union_empty]
@[simp] lemma ite_compl (t s s' : set α) : tᶜ.ite s s' = t.ite s' s :=
by rw [set.ite, set.ite, diff_compl, union_comm, diff_eq]
@[simp] lemma ite_inter_compl_self (t s s' : set α) : t.ite s s' ∩ tᶜ = s' ∩ tᶜ :=
by rw [← ite_compl, ite_inter_self]
@[simp] lemma ite_diff_self (t s s' : set α) : t.ite s s' \ t = s' \ t :=
ite_inter_compl_self t s s'
@[simp] lemma ite_same (t s : set α) : t.ite s s = s := inter_union_diff _ _
@[simp] lemma ite_left (s t : set α) : s.ite s t = s ∪ t := by simp [set.ite]
@[simp] lemma ite_right (s t : set α) : s.ite t s = t ∩ s := by simp [set.ite]
@[simp] lemma ite_empty (s s' : set α) : set.ite ∅ s s' = s' :=
by simp [set.ite]
@[simp] lemma ite_univ (s s' : set α) : set.ite univ s s' = s :=
by simp [set.ite]
@[simp] lemma ite_empty_left (t s : set α) : t.ite ∅ s = s \ t :=
by simp [set.ite]
@[simp] lemma ite_empty_right (t s : set α) : t.ite s ∅ = s ∩ t :=
by simp [set.ite]
lemma ite_mono (t : set α) {s₁ s₁' s₂ s₂' : set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h' : s₁' ⊆ s₂') :
t.ite s₁ s₁' ⊆ t.ite s₂ s₂' :=
union_subset_union (inter_subset_inter_left _ h) (inter_subset_inter_left _ h')
lemma ite_subset_union (t s s' : set α) : t.ite s s' ⊆ s ∪ s' :=
union_subset_union (inter_subset_left _ _) (diff_subset _ _)
lemma inter_subset_ite (t s s' : set α) : s ∩ s' ⊆ t.ite s s' :=
ite_same t (s ∩ s') ▸ ite_mono _ (inter_subset_left _ _) (inter_subset_right _ _)
lemma ite_inter_inter (t s₁ s₂ s₁' s₂' : set α) :
t.ite (s₁ ∩ s₂) (s₁' ∩ s₂') = t.ite s₁ s₁' ∩ t.ite s₂ s₂' :=
by { ext x, simp only [set.ite, set.mem_inter_iff, set.mem_diff, set.mem_union], itauto }
lemma ite_inter (t s₁ s₂ s : set α) :
t.ite (s₁ ∩ s) (s₂ ∩ s) = t.ite s₁ s₂ ∩ s :=
by rw [ite_inter_inter, ite_same]
lemma ite_inter_of_inter_eq (t : set α) {s₁ s₂ s : set α} (h : s₁ ∩ s = s₂ ∩ s) :
t.ite s₁ s₂ ∩ s = s₁ ∩ s :=
by rw [← ite_inter, ← h, ite_same]
lemma subset_ite {t s s' u : set α} : u ⊆ t.ite s s' ↔ u ∩ t ⊆ s ∧ u \ t ⊆ s' :=
begin
simp only [subset_def, ← forall_and_distrib],
refine forall_congr (λ x, _),
by_cases hx : x ∈ t; simp [*, set.ite]
end
/-! ### Subsingleton -/
/-- A set `s` is a `subsingleton` if it has at most one element. -/
protected def subsingleton (s : set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x⦄ (hx : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (hy : y ∈ s), x = y
lemma subsingleton.anti (ht : t.subsingleton) (hst : s ⊆ t) : s.subsingleton :=
λ x hx y hy, ht (hst hx) (hst hy)
lemma subsingleton.eq_singleton_of_mem (hs : s.subsingleton) {x:α} (hx : x ∈ s) : s = {x} :=
ext $ λ y, ⟨λ hy, (hs hx hy) ▸ mem_singleton _, λ hy, (eq_of_mem_singleton hy).symm ▸ hx⟩
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_empty : (∅ : set α).subsingleton := λ x, false.elim
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_singleton {a} : ({a} : set α).subsingleton :=
λ x hx y hy, (eq_of_mem_singleton hx).symm ▸ (eq_of_mem_singleton hy).symm ▸ rfl
lemma subsingleton_of_subset_singleton (h : s ⊆ {a}) : s.subsingleton :=
subsingleton_singleton.anti h
lemma subsingleton_of_forall_eq (a : α) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, b = a) : s.subsingleton :=
λ b hb c hc, (h _ hb).trans (h _ hc).symm
lemma subsingleton_iff_singleton {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : s.subsingleton ↔ s = {x} :=
⟨λ h, h.eq_singleton_of_mem hx, λ h,h.symm ▸ subsingleton_singleton⟩
lemma subsingleton.eq_empty_or_singleton (hs : s.subsingleton) :
s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim or.inl (λ ⟨x, hx⟩, or.inr ⟨x, hs.eq_singleton_of_mem hx⟩)
lemma subsingleton.induction_on {p : set α → Prop} (hs : s.subsingleton) (he : p ∅)
(h₁ : ∀ x, p {x}) : p s :=
by { rcases hs.eq_empty_or_singleton with rfl|⟨x, rfl⟩, exacts [he, h₁ _] }
lemma subsingleton_univ [subsingleton α] : (univ : set α).subsingleton :=
λ x hx y hy, subsingleton.elim x y
lemma subsingleton_of_univ_subsingleton (h : (univ : set α).subsingleton) : subsingleton α :=
⟨λ a b, h (mem_univ a) (mem_univ b)⟩
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_univ_iff : (univ : set α).subsingleton ↔ subsingleton α :=
⟨subsingleton_of_univ_subsingleton, λ h, @subsingleton_univ _ h⟩
lemma subsingleton_of_subsingleton [subsingleton α] {s : set α} : set.subsingleton s :=
subsingleton_univ.anti (subset_univ s)
lemma subsingleton_is_top (α : Type*) [partial_order α] : set.subsingleton {x : α | is_top x} :=
λ x hx y hy, hx.is_max.eq_of_le (hy x)
lemma subsingleton_is_bot (α : Type*) [partial_order α] : set.subsingleton {x : α | is_bot x} :=
λ x hx y hy, hx.is_min.eq_of_ge (hy x)
lemma exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton :
(∃ a : α, s = {a}) ↔ s.nonempty ∧ s.subsingleton :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ h, _⟩,
{ rintros ⟨a, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨singleton_nonempty a, subsingleton_singleton⟩ },
{ exact h.2.eq_empty_or_singleton.resolve_left h.1.ne_empty },
end
/-- `s`, coerced to a type, is a subsingleton type if and only if `s` is a subsingleton set. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma subsingleton_coe (s : set α) : subsingleton s ↔ s.subsingleton :=
begin
split,
{ refine λ h, (λ a ha b hb, _),
exact set_coe.ext_iff.2 (@subsingleton.elim s h ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩) },
{ exact λ h, subsingleton.intro (λ a b, set_coe.ext (h a.property b.property)) }
end
lemma subsingleton.coe_sort {s : set α} : s.subsingleton → subsingleton s := s.subsingleton_coe.2
/-- The `coe_sort` of a set `s` in a subsingleton type is a subsingleton.
For the corresponding result for `subtype`, see `subtype.subsingleton`. -/
instance subsingleton_coe_of_subsingleton [subsingleton α] {s : set α} : subsingleton s :=
by { rw [s.subsingleton_coe], exact subsingleton_of_subsingleton }
/-! ### Nontrivial -/
/-- A set `s` is `nontrivial` if it has at least two distinct elements. -/
protected def nontrivial (s : set α) : Prop := ∃ x y ∈ s, x ≠ y
lemma nontrivial_of_mem_mem_ne {x y} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) : s.nontrivial :=
⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
/-- Extract witnesses from s.nontrivial. This function might be used instead of case analysis on the
argument. Note that it makes a proof depend on the classical.choice axiom. -/
protected noncomputable def nontrivial.some (hs : s.nontrivial) : α × α :=
(hs.some, hs.some_spec.some_spec.some)
protected lemma nontrivial.some_fst_mem (hs : s.nontrivial) : hs.some.fst ∈ s := hs.some_spec.some
protected lemma nontrivial.some_snd_mem (hs : s.nontrivial) : hs.some.snd ∈ s :=
hs.some_spec.some_spec.some_spec.some
protected lemma nontrivial.some_fst_ne_some_snd (hs : s.nontrivial) : hs.some.fst ≠ hs.some.snd :=
hs.some_spec.some_spec.some_spec.some_spec
lemma nontrivial.mono (hs : s.nontrivial) (hst : s ⊆ t) : t.nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs in ⟨x, hst hx, y, hst hy, hxy⟩
lemma nontrivial_pair {x y} (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : set α).nontrivial :=
⟨x, mem_insert _ _, y, mem_insert_of_mem _ (mem_singleton _), hxy⟩
lemma nontrivial_of_pair_subset {x y} (hxy : x ≠ y) (h : {x, y} ⊆ s) : s.nontrivial :=
(nontrivial_pair hxy).mono h
lemma nontrivial.pair_subset (hs : s.nontrivial) : ∃ x y (hab : x ≠ y), {x, y} ⊆ s :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs in ⟨x, y, hxy, insert_subset.2 ⟨hx, (singleton_subset_iff.2 hy)⟩⟩
lemma nontrivial_iff_pair_subset : s.nontrivial ↔ ∃ x y (hxy : x ≠ y), {x, y} ⊆ s :=
⟨nontrivial.pair_subset, λ H, let ⟨x, y, hxy, h⟩ := H in nontrivial_of_pair_subset hxy h⟩
lemma nontrivial_of_exists_ne {x} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : ∃ y ∈ s, y ≠ x) : s.nontrivial :=
let ⟨y, hy, hyx⟩ := h in ⟨y, hy, x, hx, hyx⟩
lemma nontrivial.exists_ne (hs : s.nontrivial) (z) : ∃ x ∈ s, x ≠ z :=
begin
by_contra H, push_neg at H,
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩,
rw [H x hx, H y hy] at hxy,
exact hxy rfl
end
lemma nontrivial_iff_exists_ne {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : s.nontrivial ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, y ≠ x :=
⟨λ H, H.exists_ne _, nontrivial_of_exists_ne hx⟩
lemma nontrivial_of_lt [preorder α] {x y} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x < y) : s.nontrivial :=
⟨x, hx, y, hy, ne_of_lt hxy⟩
lemma nontrivial_of_exists_lt [preorder α] (H : ∃ x y ∈ s, x < y) : s.nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := H in nontrivial_of_lt hx hy hxy
lemma nontrivial.exists_lt [linear_order α] (hs : s.nontrivial) : ∃ x y ∈ s, x < y :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs in
or.elim (lt_or_gt_of_ne hxy) (λ H, ⟨x, hx, y, hy, H⟩) (λ H, ⟨y, hy, x, hx, H⟩)
lemma nontrivial_iff_exists_lt [linear_order α] : s.nontrivial ↔ ∃ x y ∈ s, x < y :=
⟨nontrivial.exists_lt, nontrivial_of_exists_lt⟩
protected lemma nontrivial.nonempty (hs : s.nontrivial) : s.nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx, _⟩ := hs in ⟨x, hx⟩
protected lemma nontrivial.ne_empty (hs : s.nontrivial) : s ≠ ∅ := hs.nonempty.ne_empty
lemma nontrivial.not_subset_empty (hs : s.nontrivial) : ¬ s ⊆ ∅ := hs.nonempty.not_subset_empty
@[simp] lemma not_nontrivial_empty : ¬ (∅ : set α).nontrivial := λ h, h.ne_empty rfl
@[simp] lemma not_nontrivial_singleton {x} : ¬ ({x} : set α).nontrivial :=
λ H, begin
rw nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (mem_singleton x) at H,
exact let ⟨y, hy, hya⟩ := H in hya (mem_singleton_iff.1 hy)
end
lemma nontrivial.ne_singleton {x} (hs : s.nontrivial) : s ≠ {x} :=
λ H, by { rw H at hs, exact not_nontrivial_singleton hs }
lemma nontrivial.not_subset_singleton {x} (hs : s.nontrivial) : ¬ s ⊆ {x} :=
(not_congr subset_singleton_iff_eq).2 (not_or hs.ne_empty hs.ne_singleton)
lemma nontrivial_univ [nontrivial α] : (univ : set α).nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, y, hxy⟩ := exists_pair_ne α in ⟨x, mem_univ _, y, mem_univ _, hxy⟩
lemma nontrivial_of_univ_nontrivial (h : (univ : set α).nontrivial) : nontrivial α :=
let ⟨x, _, y, _, hxy⟩ := h in ⟨⟨x, y, hxy⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma nontrivial_univ_iff : (univ : set α).nontrivial ↔ nontrivial α :=
⟨nontrivial_of_univ_nontrivial, λ h, @nontrivial_univ _ h⟩
lemma nontrivial_of_nontrivial (hs : s.nontrivial) : nontrivial α :=
let ⟨x, _, y, _, hxy⟩ := hs in ⟨⟨x, y, hxy⟩⟩
/-- `s`, coerced to a type, is a nontrivial type if and only if `s` is a nontrivial set. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma nontrivial_coe_sort {s : set α} : nontrivial s ↔ s.nontrivial :=
by simp_rw [← nontrivial_univ_iff, set.nontrivial, mem_univ,
exists_true_left, set_coe.exists, subtype.mk_eq_mk]
alias nontrivial_coe_sort ↔ _ nontrivial.coe_sort
/-- A type with a set `s` whose `coe_sort` is a nontrivial type is nontrivial.
For the corresponding result for `subtype`, see `subtype.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne`. -/
lemma nontrivial_of_nontrivial_coe (hs : nontrivial s) : nontrivial α :=
nontrivial_of_nontrivial $ nontrivial_coe_sort.1 hs
theorem nontrivial_mono {α : Type*} {s t : set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : nontrivial s) :
nontrivial t := nontrivial.coe_sort $ (nontrivial_coe_sort.1 hs).mono hst
@[simp] lemma not_subsingleton_iff : ¬ s.subsingleton ↔ s.nontrivial :=
by simp_rw [set.subsingleton, set.nontrivial, not_forall]
@[simp] lemma not_nontrivial_iff : ¬ s.nontrivial ↔ s.subsingleton :=
iff.not_left not_subsingleton_iff.symm
alias not_nontrivial_iff ↔ _ subsingleton.not_nontrivial
alias not_subsingleton_iff ↔ _ nontrivial.not_subsingleton
protected lemma subsingleton_or_nontrivial (s : set α) : s.subsingleton ∨ s.nontrivial :=
by simp [or_iff_not_imp_right]
lemma eq_singleton_or_nontrivial (ha : a ∈ s) : s = {a} ∨ s.nontrivial :=
by { rw ←subsingleton_iff_singleton ha, exact s.subsingleton_or_nontrivial }
lemma nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton (ha : a ∈ s) : s.nontrivial ↔ s ≠ {a} :=
⟨nontrivial.ne_singleton, (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).resolve_left⟩
lemma nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial : s.nonempty → (∃ a, s = {a}) ∨ s.nontrivial :=
λ ⟨a, ha⟩, (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).imp_left $ exists.intro a
theorem univ_eq_true_false : univ = ({true, false} : set Prop) :=
eq.symm $ eq_univ_of_forall $ classical.cases (by simp) (by simp)
section preorder
variables [preorder α] [preorder β] {f : α → β}
lemma monotone_on_iff_monotone : monotone_on f s ↔ monotone (λ a : s, f a) :=
by simp [monotone, monotone_on]
lemma antitone_on_iff_antitone : antitone_on f s ↔ antitone (λ a : s, f a) :=
by simp [antitone, antitone_on]
lemma strict_mono_on_iff_strict_mono : strict_mono_on f s ↔ strict_mono (λ a : s, f a) :=
by simp [strict_mono, strict_mono_on]
lemma strict_anti_on_iff_strict_anti : strict_anti_on f s ↔ strict_anti (λ a : s, f a) :=
by simp [strict_anti, strict_anti_on]
variables (f)
/-! ### Monotonicity on singletons -/
protected lemma subsingleton.monotone_on (h : s.subsingleton) :
monotone_on f s :=
λ a ha b hb _, (congr_arg _ (h ha hb)).le
protected lemma subsingleton.antitone_on (h : s.subsingleton) :
antitone_on f s :=
λ a ha b hb _, (congr_arg _ (h hb ha)).le
protected lemma subsingleton.strict_mono_on (h : s.subsingleton) :
strict_mono_on f s :=
λ a ha b hb hlt, (hlt.ne (h ha hb)).elim
protected lemma subsingleton.strict_anti_on (h : s.subsingleton) :
strict_anti_on f s :=
λ a ha b hb hlt, (hlt.ne (h ha hb)).elim
@[simp] lemma monotone_on_singleton : monotone_on f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.monotone_on f
@[simp] lemma antitone_on_singleton : antitone_on f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.antitone_on f
@[simp] lemma strict_mono_on_singleton : strict_mono_on f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.strict_mono_on f
@[simp] lemma strict_anti_on_singleton : strict_anti_on f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.strict_anti_on f
end preorder
section linear_order
variables [linear_order α] [linear_order β] {f : α → β}
/-- A function between linear orders which is neither monotone nor antitone makes a dent upright or
downright. -/
lemma not_monotone_on_not_antitone_on_iff_exists_le_le :
¬ monotone_on f s ∧ ¬ antitone_on f s ↔ ∃ a b c ∈ s, a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ c ∧
(f a < f b ∧ f c < f b ∨ f b < f a ∧ f b < f c) :=
by simp [monotone_on_iff_monotone, antitone_on_iff_antitone, and_assoc, exists_and_distrib_left,
not_monotone_not_antitone_iff_exists_le_le, @and.left_comm (_ ∈ s)]
/-- A function between linear orders which is neither monotone nor antitone makes a dent upright or
downright. -/
lemma not_monotone_on_not_antitone_on_iff_exists_lt_lt :
¬ monotone_on f s ∧ ¬ antitone_on f s ↔ ∃ a b c ∈ s, a < b ∧ b < c ∧
(f a < f b ∧ f c < f b ∨ f b < f a ∧ f b < f c) :=
by simp [monotone_on_iff_monotone, antitone_on_iff_antitone, and_assoc, exists_and_distrib_left,
not_monotone_not_antitone_iff_exists_lt_lt, @and.left_comm (_ ∈ s)]
end linear_order
end set
open set
namespace function
variables {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {f : α → β}
lemma injective.nonempty_apply_iff {f : set α → set β} (hf : injective f)
(h2 : f ∅ = ∅) {s : set α} : (f s).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
by rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ← h2, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, hf.ne_iff]
end function
open function
namespace set
/-! ### Lemmas about `inclusion`, the injection of subtypes induced by `⊆` -/
section inclusion
variables {α : Type*} {s t u : set α}
/-- `inclusion` is the "identity" function between two subsets `s` and `t`, where `s ⊆ t` -/
def inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) : s → t :=
λ x : s, (⟨x, h x.2⟩ : t)
@[simp] lemma inclusion_self (x : s) : inclusion subset.rfl x = x := by { cases x, refl }
lemma inclusion_eq_id (h : s ⊆ s) : inclusion h = id := funext inclusion_self
@[simp] lemma inclusion_mk {h : s ⊆ t} (a : α) (ha : a ∈ s) : inclusion h ⟨a, ha⟩ = ⟨a, h ha⟩ := rfl
lemma inclusion_right (h : s ⊆ t) (x : t) (m : (x : α) ∈ s) : inclusion h ⟨x, m⟩ = x :=
by { cases x, refl }
@[simp] lemma inclusion_inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (htu : t ⊆ u) (x : s) :
inclusion htu (inclusion hst x) = inclusion (hst.trans htu) x :=
by { cases x, refl }
@[simp] lemma inclusion_comp_inclusion {α} {s t u : set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (htu : t ⊆ u) :
inclusion htu ∘ inclusion hst = inclusion (hst.trans htu) :=
funext (inclusion_inclusion hst htu)
@[simp] lemma coe_inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) (x : s) : (inclusion h x : α) = (x : α) := rfl
lemma inclusion_injective (h : s ⊆ t) : injective (inclusion h)
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := subtype.ext_iff_val.2 ∘ subtype.ext_iff_val.1
lemma eq_of_inclusion_surjective {s t : set α} {h : s ⊆ t}
(h_surj : function.surjective (inclusion h)) : s = t :=
begin
refine set.subset.antisymm h (λ x hx, _),
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := h_surj ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact mem_of_eq_of_mem (congr_arg coe hy).symm y.prop,
end
end inclusion
end set
namespace subsingleton
variables {α : Type*} [subsingleton α]
lemma eq_univ_of_nonempty {s : set α} : s.nonempty → s = univ :=
λ ⟨x, hx⟩, eq_univ_of_forall $ λ y, subsingleton.elim x y ▸ hx
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma set_cases {p : set α → Prop} (h0 : p ∅) (h1 : p univ) (s) : p s :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ h0) $ λ h, (eq_univ_of_nonempty h).symm ▸ h1
lemma mem_iff_nonempty {α : Type*} [subsingleton α] {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ s ↔ s.nonempty :=
⟨λ hx, ⟨x, hx⟩, λ ⟨y, hy⟩, subsingleton.elim y x ▸ hy⟩
end subsingleton
/-! ### Decidability instances for sets -/
namespace set
variables {α : Type u} (s t : set α) (a : α)
instance decidable_sdiff [decidable (a ∈ s)] [decidable (a ∈ t)] : decidable (a ∈ s \ t) :=
(by apply_instance : decidable (a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t))
instance decidable_inter [decidable (a ∈ s)] [decidable (a ∈ t)] : decidable (a ∈ s ∩ t) :=
(by apply_instance : decidable (a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t))
instance decidable_union [decidable (a ∈ s)] [decidable (a ∈ t)] : decidable (a ∈ s ∪ t) :=
(by apply_instance : decidable (a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t))
instance decidable_compl [decidable (a ∈ s)] : decidable (a ∈ sᶜ) :=
(by apply_instance : decidable (a ∉ s))
instance decidable_emptyset : decidable_pred (∈ (∅ : set α)) :=
λ _, decidable.is_false (by simp)
instance decidable_univ : decidable_pred (∈ (set.univ : set α)) :=
λ _, decidable.is_true (by simp)
instance decidable_set_of (p : α → Prop) [decidable (p a)] : decidable (a ∈ {a | p a}) :=
by assumption
end set
/-! ### Monotone lemmas for sets -/
section monotone
variables {α β : Type*}
theorem monotone.inter [preorder β] {f g : β → set α}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λ x, f x ∩ g x) :=
hf.inf hg
theorem monotone_on.inter [preorder β] {f g : β → set α} {s : set β}
(hf : monotone_on f s) (hg : monotone_on g s) : monotone_on (λ x, f x ∩ g x) s :=
hf.inf hg
theorem antitone.inter [preorder β] {f g : β → set α}
(hf : antitone f) (hg : antitone g) : antitone (λ x, f x ∩ g x) :=
hf.inf hg
theorem antitone_on.inter [preorder β] {f g : β → set α} {s : set β}
(hf : antitone_on f s) (hg : antitone_on g s) : antitone_on (λ x, f x ∩ g x) s :=
hf.inf hg
theorem monotone.union [preorder β] {f g : β → set α}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λ x, f x ∪ g x) :=
hf.sup hg
theorem monotone_on.union [preorder β] {f g : β → set α} {s : set β}
(hf : monotone_on f s) (hg : monotone_on g s) : monotone_on (λ x, f x ∪ g x) s :=
hf.sup hg
theorem antitone.union [preorder β] {f g : β → set α}
(hf : antitone f) (hg : antitone g) : antitone (λ x, f x ∪ g x) :=
hf.sup hg
theorem antitone_on.union [preorder β] {f g : β → set α} {s : set β}
(hf : antitone_on f s) (hg : antitone_on g s) : antitone_on (λ x, f x ∪ g x) s :=
hf.sup hg
namespace set
theorem monotone_set_of [preorder α] {p : α → β → Prop}
(hp : ∀ b, monotone (λ a, p a b)) : monotone (λ a, {b | p a b}) :=
λ a a' h b, hp b h
theorem antitone_set_of [preorder α] {p : α → β → Prop}
(hp : ∀ b, antitone (λ a, p a b)) : antitone (λ a, {b | p a b}) :=
λ a a' h b, hp b h
/-- Quantifying over a set is antitone in the set -/
lemma antitone_bforall {P : α → Prop} : antitone (λ s : set α, ∀ x ∈ s, P x) :=
λ s t hst h x hx, h x $ hst hx
end set
end monotone
/-! ### Disjoint sets -/
variables {α β : Type*} {s t u : set α} {f : α → β}
namespace disjoint
theorem union_left (hs : disjoint s u) (ht : disjoint t u) : disjoint (s ∪ t) u :=
hs.sup_left ht
theorem union_right (ht : disjoint s t) (hu : disjoint s u) : disjoint s (t ∪ u) :=
ht.sup_right hu
lemma inter_left (u : set α) (h : disjoint s t) : disjoint (s ∩ u) t :=
h.inf_left u
lemma inter_left' (u : set α) (h : disjoint s t) : disjoint (u ∩ s) t :=
h.inf_left' _
lemma inter_right (u : set α) (h : disjoint s t) : disjoint s (t ∩ u) :=
h.inf_right _
lemma inter_right' (u : set α) (h : disjoint s t) : disjoint s (u ∩ t) :=
h.inf_right' _
lemma subset_left_of_subset_union (h : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (hac : disjoint s u) : s ⊆ t :=
hac.left_le_of_le_sup_right h
lemma subset_right_of_subset_union (h : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (hab : disjoint s t) : s ⊆ u :=
hab.left_le_of_le_sup_left h
end disjoint
|
8336d091d0fc60ce48bbc5a131c0ee5a8251f334 | 4b846d8dabdc64e7ea03552bad8f7fa74763fc67 | /tests/lean/run/unreachable_cases.lean | 66d49b92454c7b1fc26ee8035626bc573e2de195 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pacchiano/lean | 9324b33f3ac3b5c5647285160f9f6ea8d0d767dc | fdadada3a970377a6df8afcd629a6f2eab6e84e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,357,380,399 | 1,489,870,101,000 | 1,489,870,101,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 558 | lean | open nat prod
inductive ifin : ℕ → Type -- inductively defined fin-type
| fz : Π n, ifin (succ n)
| fs : Π {n}, ifin n → ifin (succ n)
open ifin
definition foo {N : Type} : Π{n : ℕ}, N → ifin n → (N × ifin n)
| (succ k) n (fz .k) := sorry
| (succ k) n (fs x) := sorry
definition bar {N : Type} : Π{n : ℕ}, (N × ifin n) → (N × ifin n)
| (succ k) (n, fz .k) := sorry
| (succ k) (n, fs x) := sorry
definition bar2 {N : Type} : Π{n : ℕ}, (N × ifin n) → (N × ifin n)
| (succ k) (n, fz .k) := sorry
| (succ k) (n, fs x) := sorry
|
6a104f28c853104e164f314ef5fbb347c93492c7 | a4673261e60b025e2c8c825dfa4ab9108246c32e | /stage0/src/Init/Core.lean | 63a238332ea9e4e26c88a11f44f2814e65fdbad9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/lean4 | c02dec0cc32c4bccab009285475f265f17d73228 | 2909313475588cc20ac0436e55548a4502050d0a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,129,550,893 | 1,606,415,348,000 | 1,606,415,348,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 34,727 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
notation, basic datatypes and type classes
-/
prelude
import Init.Prelude
import Init.Notation
universes u v w
def inline {α : Sort u} (a : α) : α := a
@[inline] def flip {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {φ : Sort w} (f : α → β → φ) : β → α → φ :=
fun b a => f a b
/- Remark: thunks have an efficient implementation in the runtime. -/
structure Thunk (α : Type u) : Type u :=
(fn : Unit → α)
attribute [extern "lean_mk_thunk"] Thunk.mk
@[noinline, extern "lean_thunk_pure"]
protected def Thunk.pure {α : Type u} (a : α) : Thunk α :=
⟨fun _ => a⟩
@[noinline, extern "lean_thunk_get_own"]
protected def Thunk.get {α : Type u} (x : @& Thunk α) : α :=
x.fn ()
@[noinline, extern "lean_thunk_map"]
protected def Thunk.map {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (x : Thunk α) : Thunk β :=
⟨fun _ => f x.get⟩
@[noinline, extern "lean_thunk_bind"]
protected def Thunk.bind {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (x : Thunk α) (f : α → Thunk β) : Thunk β :=
⟨fun _ => (f x.get).get⟩
abbrev Eq.ndrecOn.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : α → Sort u1} {b : α} (h : Eq a b) (m : motive a) : motive b :=
Eq.ndrec m h
structure Iff (a b : Prop) : Prop :=
intro :: (mp : a → b) (mpr : b → a)
infix:20 " <-> " => Iff
infix:20 " ↔ " => Iff
/- Eq basic support -/
theorem Eq.trans {α : Sort u} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b = c) : a = c :=
h₂ ▸ h₁
inductive Sum (α : Type u) (β : Type v) :=
| inl (val : α) : Sum α β
| inr (val : β) : Sum α β
inductive PSum (α : Sort u) (β : Sort v) :=
| inl (val : α) : PSum α β
| inr (val : β) : PSum α β
structure Sigma {α : Type u} (β : α → Type v) :=
mk :: (fst : α) (snd : β fst)
attribute [unbox] Sigma
structure PSigma {α : Sort u} (β : α → Sort v) :=
mk :: (fst : α) (snd : β fst)
inductive Exists {α : Sort u} (p : α → Prop) : Prop :=
| intro (w : α) (h : p w) : Exists p
/- Auxiliary type used to compile `for x in xs` notation. -/
inductive ForInStep (α : Type u) :=
| done : α → ForInStep α
| yield : α → ForInStep α
/- Auxiliary type used to compile `do` notation. -/
inductive DoResultPRBC (α β σ : Type u) :=
| «pure» : α → σ → DoResultPRBC α β σ
| «return» : β → σ → DoResultPRBC α β σ
| «break» : σ → DoResultPRBC α β σ
| «continue» : σ → DoResultPRBC α β σ
/- Auxiliary type used to compile `do` notation. -/
inductive DoResultPR (α β σ : Type u) :=
| «pure» : α → σ → DoResultPR α β σ
| «return» : β → σ → DoResultPR α β σ
/- Auxiliary type used to compile `do` notation. -/
inductive DoResultBC (σ : Type u) :=
| «break» : σ → DoResultBC σ
| «continue» : σ → DoResultBC σ
/- Auxiliary type used to compile `do` notation. -/
inductive DoResultSBC (α σ : Type u) :=
| «pureReturn» : α → σ → DoResultSBC α σ
| «break» : σ → DoResultSBC α σ
| «continue» : σ → DoResultSBC α σ
class HasEquiv (α : Sort u) := (Equiv : α → α → Prop)
infix:50 " ≈ " => HasEquiv.Equiv
class EmptyCollection (α : Type u) := (emptyCollection : α)
/- Remark: tasks have an efficient implementation in the runtime. -/
structure Task (α : Type u) : Type u := pure ::
(get : α)
attribute [extern "lean_task_pure"] Task.pure
attribute [extern "lean_task_get_own"] Task.get
namespace Task
/-- Task priority. Tasks with higher priority will always be scheduled before ones with lower priority. -/
abbrev Priority := Nat
def Priority.default : Priority := 0
-- see `LEAN_MAX_PRIO`
def Priority.max : Priority := 8
/--
Any priority higher than `Task.Priority.max` will result in the task being scheduled immediately on a dedicated thread.
This is particularly useful for long-running and/or I/O-bound tasks since Lean will by default allocate no more
non-dedicated workers than the number of cores to reduce context switches. -/
def Priority.dedicated : Priority := 9
@[noinline, extern "lean_task_spawn"]
protected def spawn {α : Type u} (fn : Unit → α) (prio := Priority.default) : Task α :=
⟨fn ()⟩
@[noinline, extern "lean_task_map"]
protected def map {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (x : Task α) (prio := Priority.default) : Task β :=
⟨f x.get⟩
@[noinline, extern "lean_task_bind"]
protected def bind {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (x : Task α) (f : α → Task β) (prio := Priority.default) : Task β :=
⟨(f x.get).get⟩
end Task
/- Some type that is not a scalar value in our runtime. -/
structure NonScalar :=
(val : Nat)
/- Some type that is not a scalar value in our runtime and is universe polymorphic. -/
inductive PNonScalar : Type u :=
| mk (v : Nat) : PNonScalar
theorem natAddZero (n : Nat) : n + 0 = n := rfl
theorem optParamEq (α : Sort u) (default : α) : optParam α default = α := rfl
/- Boolean operators -/
@[extern c inline "#1 || #2"] def strictOr (b₁ b₂ : Bool) := b₁ || b₂
@[extern c inline "#1 && #2"] def strictAnd (b₁ b₂ : Bool) := b₁ && b₂
@[inline] def bne {α : Type u} [BEq α] (a b : α) : Bool :=
!(a == b)
infix:50 " != " => bne
/- Logical connectives an equality -/
def implies (a b : Prop) := a → b
theorem implies.trans {p q r : Prop} (h₁ : implies p q) (h₂ : implies q r) : implies p r :=
fun hp => h₂ (h₁ hp)
def trivial : True := ⟨⟩
theorem mt {a b : Prop} (h₁ : a → b) (h₂ : ¬b) : ¬a :=
fun ha => h₂ (h₁ ha)
theorem notFalse : ¬False := id
-- proof irrelevance is built in
theorem proofIrrel {a : Prop} (h₁ h₂ : a) : h₁ = h₂ := rfl
theorem id.def {α : Sort u} (a : α) : id a = a := rfl
@[macroInline] def Eq.mp {α β : Sort u} (h : α = β) (a : α) : β :=
h ▸ a
@[macroInline] def Eq.mpr {α β : Sort u} (h : α = β) (b : β) : α :=
h ▸ b
theorem Eq.substr {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {a b : α} (h₁ : b = a) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
h₁ ▸ h₂
theorem congr {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {a₁ a₂ : α} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : a₁ = a₂) : f₁ a₁ = f₂ a₂ :=
h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl
theorem congrFun {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {f g : ∀ x, β x} (h : f = g) (a : α) : f a = g a :=
h ▸ rfl
theorem castEq {α : Sort u} (h : α = α) (a : α) : cast h a = a :=
rfl
@[reducible] def Ne {α : Sort u} (a b : α) :=
¬(a = b)
infix:50 " ≠ " => Ne
section Ne
variable {α : Sort u}
variables {a b : α} {p : Prop}
theorem Ne.intro (h : a = b → False) : a ≠ b := h
theorem Ne.elim (h : a ≠ b) : a = b → False := h
theorem Ne.irrefl (h : a ≠ a) : False := h rfl
theorem Ne.symm (h : a ≠ b) : b ≠ a :=
fun h₁ => h (h₁.symm)
theorem falseOfNe : a ≠ a → False := Ne.irrefl
theorem neFalseOfSelf : p → p ≠ False :=
fun (hp : p) (h : p = False) => h ▸ hp
theorem neTrueOfNot : ¬p → p ≠ True :=
fun (hnp : ¬p) (h : p = True) =>
have ¬True from h ▸ hnp
this trivial
theorem trueNeFalse : ¬True = False :=
neFalseOfSelf trivial
end Ne
section
variables {α β φ : Sort u} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : φ}
theorem HEq.ndrec.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} → β → Sort u1} (m : motive a) {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : a ≅ b) : motive b :=
@HEq.rec α a (fun b _ => motive b) m β b h
theorem HEq.ndrecOn.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} → β → Sort u1} {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : a ≅ b) (m : motive a) : motive b :=
@HEq.rec α a (fun b _ => motive b) m β b h
theorem HEq.elim {α : Sort u} {a : α} {p : α → Sort v} {b : α} (h₁ : a ≅ b) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
eqOfHEq h₁ ▸ h₂
theorem HEq.subst {p : (T : Sort u) → T → Prop} (h₁ : a ≅ b) (h₂ : p α a) : p β b :=
HEq.ndrecOn h₁ h₂
theorem HEq.symm (h : a ≅ b) : b ≅ a :=
HEq.ndrecOn (motive := fun x => x ≅ a) h (HEq.refl a)
theorem heqOfEq (h : a = a') : a ≅ a' :=
Eq.subst h (HEq.refl a)
theorem HEq.trans (h₁ : a ≅ b) (h₂ : b ≅ c) : a ≅ c :=
HEq.subst h₂ h₁
theorem heqOfHEqOfEq (h₁ : a ≅ b) (h₂ : b = b') : a ≅ b' :=
HEq.trans h₁ (heqOfEq h₂)
theorem heqOfEqOfHEq (h₁ : a = a') (h₂ : a' ≅ b) : a ≅ b :=
HEq.trans (heqOfEq h₁) h₂
def typeEqOfHEq (h : a ≅ b) : α = β :=
HEq.ndrecOn (motive := @fun (x : Sort u) _ => α = x) h (Eq.refl α)
end
theorem eqRecHEq {α : Sort u} {φ : α → Sort v} : {a a' : α} → (h : a = a') → (p : φ a) → (Eq.recOn (motive := fun x _ => φ x) h p) ≅ p
| a, _, rfl, p => HEq.refl p
theorem heqOfEqRecEq {α β : Sort u} {a : α} {b : β} (h₁ : α = β) (h₂ : Eq.rec (motive := fun α _ => α) a h₁ = b) : a ≅ b := by
subst h₁
apply heqOfEq
exact h₂
done
theorem castHEq : ∀ {α β : Sort u} (h : α = β) (a : α), cast h a ≅ a
| α, _, rfl, a => HEq.refl a
variables {a b c d : Prop}
theorem iffIffImpliesAndImplies (a b : Prop) : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) ∧ (b → a) :=
Iff.intro (fun h => And.intro h.mp h.mpr) (fun h => Iff.intro h.left h.right)
theorem Iff.refl (a : Prop) : a ↔ a :=
Iff.intro (fun h => h) (fun h => h)
theorem Iff.rfl {a : Prop} : a ↔ a :=
Iff.refl a
theorem Iff.trans (h₁ : a ↔ b) (h₂ : b ↔ c) : a ↔ c :=
Iff.intro
(fun ha => Iff.mp h₂ (Iff.mp h₁ ha))
(fun hc => Iff.mpr h₁ (Iff.mpr h₂ hc))
theorem Iff.symm (h : a ↔ b) : b ↔ a :=
Iff.intro (Iff.mpr h) (Iff.mp h)
theorem Iff.comm : (a ↔ b) ↔ (b ↔ a) :=
Iff.intro Iff.symm Iff.symm
/- Exists -/
theorem Exists.elim {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop}
(h₁ : Exists (fun x => p x)) (h₂ : ∀ (a : α), p a → b) : b :=
h₂ h₁.1 h₁.2
/- Decidable -/
theorem decideTrueEqTrue (h : Decidable True) : @decide True h = true :=
match h with
| isTrue h => rfl
| isFalse h => False.elim <| h ⟨⟩
theorem decideFalseEqFalse (h : Decidable False) : @decide False h = false :=
match h with
| isFalse h => rfl
| isTrue h => False.elim h
/-- Similar to `decide`, but uses an explicit instance -/
@[inline] def toBoolUsing {p : Prop} (d : Decidable p) : Bool :=
@decide p d
theorem toBoolUsingEqTrue {p : Prop} (d : Decidable p) (h : p) : toBoolUsing d = true :=
@decideEqTrue _ d h
theorem ofBoolUsingEqTrue {p : Prop} {d : Decidable p} (h : toBoolUsing d = true) : p :=
@ofDecideEqTrue _ d h
theorem ofBoolUsingEqFalse {p : Prop} {d : Decidable p} (h : toBoolUsing d = false) : ¬ p :=
@ofDecideEqFalse _ d h
instance : Decidable True :=
isTrue trivial
instance : Decidable False :=
isFalse notFalse
namespace Decidable
variables {p q : Prop}
@[macroInline] def byCases {q : Sort u} [dec : Decidable p] (h1 : p → q) (h2 : ¬p → q) : q :=
match dec with
| isTrue h => h1 h
| isFalse h => h2 h
theorem em (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : p ∨ ¬p :=
byCases Or.inl Or.inr
theorem byContradiction [dec : Decidable p] (h : ¬p → False) : p :=
byCases id (fun np => False.elim (h np))
theorem ofNotNot [Decidable p] : ¬ ¬ p → p :=
fun hnn => byContradiction (fun hn => absurd hn hnn)
theorem notAndIffOrNot (p q : Prop) [d₁ : Decidable p] [d₂ : Decidable q] : ¬ (p ∧ q) ↔ ¬ p ∨ ¬ q :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => match d₁, d₂ with
| isTrue h₁, isTrue h₂ => absurd (And.intro h₁ h₂) h
| _, isFalse h₂ => Or.inr h₂
| isFalse h₁, _ => Or.inl h₁)
(fun (h) ⟨hp, hq⟩ => match h with
| Or.inl h => h hp
| Or.inr h => h hq)
end Decidable
section
variables {p q : Prop}
@[inline] def decidableOfDecidableOfIff (hp : Decidable p) (h : p ↔ q) : Decidable q :=
if hp : p then
isTrue (Iff.mp h hp)
else
isFalse fun hq => absurd (Iff.mpr h hq) hp
@[inline] def decidableOfDecidableOfEq (hp : Decidable p) (h : p = q) : Decidable q :=
h ▸ hp
end
@[macroInline] instance {p q} [Decidable p] [Decidable q] : Decidable (p → q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then isTrue (fun h => hq)
else isFalse (fun h => absurd (h hp) hq)
else isTrue (fun h => absurd h hp)
instance {p q} [Decidable p] [Decidable q] : Decidable (p ↔ q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then
isTrue ⟨fun _ => hq, fun _ => hp⟩
else
isFalse fun h => hq (h.1 hp)
else
if hq : q then
isFalse fun h => hp (h.2 hq)
else
isTrue ⟨fun h => absurd h hp, fun h => absurd h hq⟩
/- if-then-else expression theorems -/
theorem ifPos {c : Prop} [h : Decidable c] (hc : c) {α : Sort u} {t e : α} : (ite c t e) = t :=
match h with
| (isTrue hc) => rfl
| (isFalse hnc) => absurd hc hnc
theorem ifNeg {c : Prop} [h : Decidable c] (hnc : ¬c) {α : Sort u} {t e : α} : (ite c t e) = e :=
match h with
| (isTrue hc) => absurd hc hnc
| (isFalse hnc) => rfl
theorem difPos {c : Prop} [h : Decidable c] (hc : c) {α : Sort u} {t : c → α} {e : ¬ c → α} : (dite c t e) = t hc :=
match h with
| (isTrue hc) => rfl
| (isFalse hnc) => absurd hc hnc
theorem difNeg {c : Prop} [h : Decidable c] (hnc : ¬c) {α : Sort u} {t : c → α} {e : ¬ c → α} : (dite c t e) = e hnc :=
match h with
| (isTrue hc) => absurd hc hnc
| (isFalse hnc) => rfl
-- Remark: dite and ite are "defally equal" when we ignore the proofs.
theorem difEqIf (c : Prop) [h : Decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t : α) (e : α) : dite c (fun h => t) (fun h => e) = ite c t e :=
match h with
| (isTrue hc) => rfl
| (isFalse hnc) => rfl
instance {c t e : Prop} [dC : Decidable c] [dT : Decidable t] [dE : Decidable e] : Decidable (if c then t else e) :=
match dC with
| (isTrue hc) => dT
| (isFalse hc) => dE
instance {c : Prop} {t : c → Prop} {e : ¬c → Prop} [dC : Decidable c] [dT : ∀ h, Decidable (t h)] [dE : ∀ h, Decidable (e h)] : Decidable (if h : c then t h else e h) :=
match dC with
| (isTrue hc) => dT hc
| (isFalse hc) => dE hc
/- Inhabited -/
instance : Inhabited Prop where
default := True
instance : Inhabited Bool where
default := false
instance : Inhabited True where
default := trivial
instance : Inhabited NonScalar where
default := ⟨arbitrary⟩
instance : Inhabited PNonScalar.{u} where
default := ⟨arbitrary⟩
instance {α} [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (ForInStep α) where
default := ForInStep.done (arbitrary)
class inductive Nonempty (α : Sort u) : Prop :=
| intro (val : α) : Nonempty α
protected def Nonempty.elim {α : Sort u} {p : Prop} (h₁ : Nonempty α) (h₂ : α → p) : p :=
h₂ h₁.1
instance {α : Sort u} [Inhabited α] : Nonempty α where
val := arbitrary
theorem nonemptyOfExists {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} : Exists (fun x => p x) → Nonempty α
| ⟨w, h⟩ => ⟨w⟩
/- Subsingleton -/
class inductive Subsingleton (α : Sort u) : Prop :=
| intro (h : (a b : α) → a = b) : Subsingleton α
protected def Subsingleton.elim {α : Sort u} [h : Subsingleton α] : (a b : α) → a = b :=
match h with
| intro h => h
protected def Subsingleton.helim {α β : Sort u} [h₁ : Subsingleton α] (h₂ : α = β) (a : α) (b : β) : a ≅ b := by
subst h₂
apply heqOfEq
apply Subsingleton.elim
instance (p : Prop) : Subsingleton p :=
⟨fun a b => proofIrrel a b⟩
instance (p : Prop) : Subsingleton (Decidable p) :=
Subsingleton.intro fun
| (isTrue t₁) => fun
| (isTrue t₂) => proofIrrel t₁ t₂ ▸ rfl
| (isFalse f₂) => absurd t₁ f₂
| (isFalse f₁) => fun
| (isTrue t₂) => absurd t₂ f₁
| (isFalse f₂) => proofIrrel f₁ f₂ ▸ rfl
theorem recSubsingleton
{p : Prop} [h : Decidable p]
{h₁ : p → Sort u}
{h₂ : ¬p → Sort u}
[h₃ : ∀ (h : p), Subsingleton (h₁ h)]
[h₄ : ∀ (h : ¬p), Subsingleton (h₂ h)]
: Subsingleton (Decidable.casesOn (motive := fun _ => Sort u) h h₂ h₁) :=
match h with
| (isTrue h) => h₃ h
| (isFalse h) => h₄ h
structure Equivalence {α : Sort u} (r : α → α → Prop) : Prop :=
(refl : ∀ x, r x x)
(symm : ∀ {x y}, r x y → r y x)
(trans : ∀ {x y z}, r x y → r y z → r x z)
def emptyRelation {α : Sort u} (a₁ a₂ : α) : Prop :=
False
def Subrelation {α : Sort u} (q r : α → α → Prop) :=
∀ {x y}, q x y → r x y
def InvImage {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (r : β → β → Prop) (f : α → β) : α → α → Prop :=
fun a₁ a₂ => r (f a₁) (f a₂)
inductive TC {α : Sort u} (r : α → α → Prop) : α → α → Prop :=
| base : ∀ a b, r a b → TC r a b
| trans : ∀ a b c, TC r a b → TC r b c → TC r a c
/- Subtype -/
namespace Subtype
def existsOfSubtype {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop} : { x // p x } → Exists (fun x => p x)
| ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨a, h⟩
variables {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop}
protected theorem eq : ∀ {a1 a2 : {x // p x}}, val a1 = val a2 → a1 = a2
| ⟨x, h1⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, rfl => rfl
theorem eta (a : {x // p x}) (h : p (val a)) : mk (val a) h = a := by
cases a
exact rfl
instance {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (h : p a) : Inhabited {x // p x} where
default := ⟨a, h⟩
instance {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq {x : α // p x} :=
fun ⟨a, h₁⟩ ⟨b, h₂⟩ =>
if h : a = b then isTrue (by subst h; exact rfl)
else isFalse (fun h' => Subtype.noConfusion h' (fun h' => absurd h' h))
end Subtype
/- Sum -/
section
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
instance Sum.inhabitedLeft [h : Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Sum α β) where
default := Sum.inl arbitrary
instance Sum.inhabitedRight [h : Inhabited β] : Inhabited (Sum α β) where
default := Sum.inr arbitrary
instance {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : DecidableEq (Sum α β) := fun a b =>
match a, b with
| (Sum.inl a), (Sum.inl b) =>
if h : a = b then isTrue (h ▸ rfl)
else isFalse (fun h' => Sum.noConfusion h' (fun h' => absurd h' h))
| (Sum.inr a), (Sum.inr b) =>
if h : a = b then isTrue (h ▸ rfl)
else isFalse (fun h' => Sum.noConfusion h' (fun h' => absurd h' h))
| (Sum.inr a), (Sum.inl b) => isFalse (fun h => Sum.noConfusion h)
| (Sum.inl a), (Sum.inr b) => isFalse (fun h => Sum.noConfusion h)
end
/- Product -/
section
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
instance [Inhabited α] [Inhabited β] : Inhabited (α × β) where
default := (arbitrary, arbitrary)
instance [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : DecidableEq (α × β) :=
fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨a', b'⟩ =>
match (decEq a a') with
| (isTrue e₁) =>
match (decEq b b') with
| (isTrue e₂) => isTrue (e₁ ▸ e₂ ▸ rfl)
| (isFalse n₂) => isFalse (fun h => Prod.noConfusion h (fun e₁' e₂' => absurd e₂' n₂))
| (isFalse n₁) => isFalse (fun h => Prod.noConfusion h (fun e₁' e₂' => absurd e₁' n₁))
instance [BEq α] [BEq β] : BEq (α × β) where
beq := fun ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ => a₁ == a₂ && b₁ == b₂
instance [HasLess α] [HasLess β] : HasLess (α × β) where
Less s t := s.1 < t.1 ∨ (s.1 = t.1 ∧ s.2 < t.2)
instance prodHasDecidableLt
[HasLess α] [HasLess β] [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
[(a b : α) → Decidable (a < b)] [(a b : β) → Decidable (a < b)]
: (s t : α × β) → Decidable (s < t) :=
fun t s => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (_ ∨ _))
theorem Prod.ltDef [HasLess α] [HasLess β] (s t : α × β) : (s < t) = (s.1 < t.1 ∨ (s.1 = t.1 ∧ s.2 < t.2)) :=
rfl
end
def Prod.map.{u₁, u₂, v₁, v₂} {α₁ : Type u₁} {α₂ : Type u₂} {β₁ : Type v₁} {β₂ : Type v₂}
(f : α₁ → α₂) (g : β₁ → β₂) : α₁ × β₁ → α₂ × β₂
| (a, b) => (f a, g b)
/- Dependent products -/
theorem exOfPsig {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop} : (PSigma (fun x => p x)) → Exists (fun x => p x)
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
protected theorem PSigma.eta {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ : β a₁} {b₂ : β a₂}
(h₁ : a₁ = a₂) (h₂ : Eq.ndrec b₁ h₁ = b₂) : PSigma.mk a₁ b₁ = PSigma.mk a₂ b₂ := by
subst h₁
subst h₂
exact rfl
/- Universe polymorphic unit -/
theorem punitEq (a b : PUnit) : a = b := by
cases a; cases b; exact rfl
theorem punitEqPUnit (a : PUnit) : a = () :=
punitEq a ()
instance : Subsingleton PUnit :=
Subsingleton.intro punitEq
instance : Inhabited PUnit where
default := ⟨⟩
instance : DecidableEq PUnit :=
fun a b => isTrue (punitEq a b)
/- Setoid -/
class Setoid (α : Sort u) :=
(r : α → α → Prop)
(iseqv {} : Equivalence r)
instance {α : Sort u} [Setoid α] : HasEquiv α :=
⟨Setoid.r⟩
namespace Setoid
variables {α : Sort u} [Setoid α]
theorem refl (a : α) : a ≈ a :=
(Setoid.iseqv α).refl a
theorem symm {a b : α} (hab : a ≈ b) : b ≈ a :=
(Setoid.iseqv α).symm hab
theorem trans {a b c : α} (hab : a ≈ b) (hbc : b ≈ c) : a ≈ c :=
(Setoid.iseqv α).trans hab hbc
end Setoid
/- Propositional extensionality -/
axiom propext {a b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) → a = b
/- Quotients -/
-- Iff can now be used to do substitutions in a calculation
theorem iffSubst {a b : Prop} {p : Prop → Prop} (h₁ : a ↔ b) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
Eq.subst (propext h₁) h₂
namespace Quot
axiom sound : ∀ {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} {a b : α}, r a b → Quot.mk r a = Quot.mk r b
protected theorem liftBeta {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} {β : Sort v}
(f : α → β)
(c : (a b : α) → r a b → f a = f b)
(a : α)
: lift f c (Quot.mk r a) = f a :=
rfl
protected theorem indBeta {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} {motive : Quot r → Prop}
(p : (a : α) → motive (Quot.mk r a))
(a : α)
: (ind p (Quot.mk r a) : motive (Quot.mk r a)) = p a :=
rfl
protected abbrev liftOn {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {r : α → α → Prop} (q : Quot r) (f : α → β) (c : (a b : α) → r a b → f a = f b) : β :=
lift f c q
protected theorem inductionOn {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} {motive : Quot r → Prop}
(q : Quot r)
(h : (a : α) → motive (Quot.mk r a))
: motive q :=
ind h q
theorem existsRep {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} (q : Quot r) : Exists (fun a => (Quot.mk r a) = q) :=
Quot.inductionOn (motive := fun q => Exists (fun a => (Quot.mk r a) = q)) q (fun a => ⟨a, rfl⟩)
section
variable {α : Sort u}
variable {r : α → α → Prop}
variable {motive : Quot r → Sort v}
@[reducible, macroInline]
protected def indep (f : (a : α) → motive (Quot.mk r a)) (a : α) : PSigma motive :=
⟨Quot.mk r a, f a⟩
protected theorem indepCoherent
(f : (a : α) → motive (Quot.mk r a))
(h : (a b : α) → (p : r a b) → Eq.ndrec (f a) (sound p) = f b)
: (a b : α) → r a b → Quot.indep f a = Quot.indep f b :=
fun a b e => PSigma.eta (sound e) (h a b e)
protected theorem liftIndepPr1
(f : (a : α) → motive (Quot.mk r a))
(h : ∀ (a b : α) (p : r a b), Eq.ndrec (f a) (sound p) = f b)
(q : Quot r)
: (lift (Quot.indep f) (Quot.indepCoherent f h) q).1 = q := by
induction q using Quot.ind
exact rfl
protected abbrev rec
(f : (a : α) → motive (Quot.mk r a))
(h : (a b : α) → (p : r a b) → Eq.ndrec (f a) (sound p) = f b)
(q : Quot r) : motive q :=
Eq.ndrecOn (Quot.liftIndepPr1 f h q) ((lift (Quot.indep f) (Quot.indepCoherent f h) q).2)
protected abbrev recOn
(q : Quot r)
(f : (a : α) → motive (Quot.mk r a))
(h : (a b : α) → (p : r a b) → Eq.ndrec (f a) (sound p) = f b)
: motive q :=
Quot.rec f h q
protected abbrev recOnSubsingleton
[h : (a : α) → Subsingleton (motive (Quot.mk r a))]
(q : Quot r)
(f : (a : α) → motive (Quot.mk r a))
: motive q := by
induction q using Quot.rec
apply f
apply Subsingleton.elim
protected abbrev hrecOn
(q : Quot r)
(f : (a : α) → motive (Quot.mk r a))
(c : (a b : α) → (p : r a b) → f a ≅ f b)
: motive q :=
Quot.recOn q f fun a b p => eqOfHEq <|
have p₁ : Eq.ndrec (f a) (sound p) ≅ f a := eqRecHEq (sound p) (f a)
HEq.trans p₁ (c a b p)
end
end Quot
def Quotient {α : Sort u} (s : Setoid α) :=
@Quot α Setoid.r
namespace Quotient
@[inline]
protected def mk {α : Sort u} [s : Setoid α] (a : α) : Quotient s :=
Quot.mk Setoid.r a
def sound {α : Sort u} [s : Setoid α] {a b : α} : a ≈ b → Quotient.mk a = Quotient.mk b :=
Quot.sound
protected abbrev lift {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} [s : Setoid α] (f : α → β) : ((a b : α) → a ≈ b → f a = f b) → Quotient s → β :=
Quot.lift f
protected theorem ind {α : Sort u} [s : Setoid α] {motive : Quotient s → Prop} : ((a : α) → motive (Quotient.mk a)) → (q : Quot Setoid.r) → motive q :=
Quot.ind
protected abbrev liftOn {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} [s : Setoid α] (q : Quotient s) (f : α → β) (c : (a b : α) → a ≈ b → f a = f b) : β :=
Quot.liftOn q f c
protected theorem inductionOn {α : Sort u} [s : Setoid α] {motive : Quotient s → Prop}
(q : Quotient s)
(h : (a : α) → motive (Quotient.mk a))
: motive q :=
Quot.inductionOn q h
theorem existsRep {α : Sort u} [s : Setoid α] (q : Quotient s) : Exists (fun (a : α) => Quotient.mk a = q) :=
Quot.existsRep q
section
variable {α : Sort u}
variable [s : Setoid α]
variable {motive : Quotient s → Sort v}
@[inline]
protected def rec
(f : (a : α) → motive (Quotient.mk a))
(h : (a b : α) → (p : a ≈ b) → Eq.ndrec (f a) (Quotient.sound p) = f b)
(q : Quotient s)
: motive q :=
Quot.rec f h q
protected abbrev recOn
(q : Quotient s)
(f : (a : α) → motive (Quotient.mk a))
(h : (a b : α) → (p : a ≈ b) → Eq.ndrec (f a) (Quotient.sound p) = f b)
: motive q :=
Quot.recOn q f h
protected abbrev recOnSubsingleton
[h : (a : α) → Subsingleton (motive (Quotient.mk a))]
(q : Quotient s)
(f : (a : α) → motive (Quotient.mk a))
: motive q :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton (h := h) q f
protected abbrev hrecOn
(q : Quotient s)
(f : (a : α) → motive (Quotient.mk a))
(c : (a b : α) → (p : a ≈ b) → f a ≅ f b)
: motive q :=
Quot.hrecOn q f c
end
section
universes uA uB uC
variables {α : Sort uA} {β : Sort uB} {φ : Sort uC}
variables [s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid β]
protected abbrev lift₂
(f : α → β → φ)
(c : (a₁ : α) → (b₁ : β) → (a₂ : α) → (b₂ : β) → a₁ ≈ a₂ → b₁ ≈ b₂ → f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂)
(q₁ : Quotient s₁) (q₂ : Quotient s₂)
: φ := by
apply Quotient.lift (fun (a₁ : α) => Quotient.lift (f a₁) (fun (a b : β) => c a₁ a a₁ b (Setoid.refl a₁)) q₂) _ q₁
intros
induction q₂ using Quotient.ind
apply c; assumption; apply Setoid.refl
protected abbrev liftOn₂
(q₁ : Quotient s₁)
(q₂ : Quotient s₂)
(f : α → β → φ)
(c : (a₁ : α) → (b₁ : β) → (a₂ : α) → (b₂ : β) → a₁ ≈ a₂ → b₁ ≈ b₂ → f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂)
: φ :=
Quotient.lift₂ f c q₁ q₂
protected theorem ind₂
{motive : Quotient s₁ → Quotient s₂ → Prop}
(h : (a : α) → (b : β) → motive (Quotient.mk a) (Quotient.mk b))
(q₁ : Quotient s₁)
(q₂ : Quotient s₂)
: motive q₁ q₂ := by
induction q₁ using Quotient.ind
induction q₂ using Quotient.ind
apply h
protected theorem inductionOn₂
{motive : Quotient s₁ → Quotient s₂ → Prop}
(q₁ : Quotient s₁)
(q₂ : Quotient s₂)
(h : (a : α) → (b : β) → motive (Quotient.mk a) (Quotient.mk b))
: motive q₁ q₂ := by
induction q₁ using Quotient.ind
induction q₂ using Quotient.ind
apply h
protected theorem inductionOn₃
[s₃ : Setoid φ]
{motive : Quotient s₁ → Quotient s₂ → Quotient s₃ → Prop}
(q₁ : Quotient s₁)
(q₂ : Quotient s₂)
(q₃ : Quotient s₃)
(h : (a : α) → (b : β) → (c : φ) → motive (Quotient.mk a) (Quotient.mk b) (Quotient.mk c))
: motive q₁ q₂ q₃ := by
induction q₁ using Quotient.ind
induction q₂ using Quotient.ind
induction q₃ using Quotient.ind
apply h
end
section Exact
variable {α : Sort u}
private def rel [s : Setoid α] (q₁ q₂ : Quotient s) : Prop :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ q₁ q₂
(fun a₁ a₂ => a₁ ≈ a₂)
(fun a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ a₁b₁ a₂b₂ =>
propext (Iff.intro
(fun a₁a₂ => Setoid.trans (Setoid.symm a₁b₁) (Setoid.trans a₁a₂ a₂b₂))
(fun b₁b₂ => Setoid.trans a₁b₁ (Setoid.trans b₁b₂ (Setoid.symm a₂b₂)))))
private theorem rel.refl [s : Setoid α] (q : Quotient s) : rel q q :=
Quot.inductionOn (motive := fun q => rel q q) q (fun a => Setoid.refl a)
private theorem eqImpRel [s : Setoid α] {q₁ q₂ : Quotient s} : q₁ = q₂ → rel q₁ q₂ :=
fun h => Eq.ndrecOn h (rel.refl q₁)
theorem exact [s : Setoid α] {a b : α} : Quotient.mk a = Quotient.mk b → a ≈ b :=
fun h => eqImpRel h
end Exact
section
universes uA uB uC
variables {α : Sort uA} {β : Sort uB}
variables [s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid β]
protected abbrev recOnSubsingleton₂
{motive : Quotient s₁ → Quotient s₂ → Sort uC}
[s : (a : α) → (b : β) → Subsingleton (motive (Quotient.mk a) (Quotient.mk b))]
(q₁ : Quotient s₁)
(q₂ : Quotient s₂)
(g : (a : α) → (b : β) → motive (Quotient.mk a) (Quotient.mk b))
: motive q₁ q₂ := by
induction q₁ using Quot.recOnSubsingleton
induction q₂ using Quot.recOnSubsingleton
intro a; apply s
induction q₂ using Quot.recOnSubsingleton
intro a; apply s
apply g
end
end Quotient
section
variable {α : Type u}
variable (r : α → α → Prop)
instance {α : Sort u} {s : Setoid α} [d : ∀ (a b : α), Decidable (a ≈ b)] : DecidableEq (Quotient s) :=
fun (q₁ q₂ : Quotient s) =>
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ (motive := fun a b => Decidable (a = b)) q₁ q₂
(fun a₁ a₂ =>
match (d a₁ a₂) with
| (isTrue h₁) => isTrue (Quotient.sound h₁)
| (isFalse h₂) => isFalse (fun h => absurd (Quotient.exact h) h₂))
/- Function extensionality -/
namespace Function
variables {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v}
def Equiv (f₁ f₂ : ∀ (x : α), β x) : Prop := ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x
protected theorem Equiv.refl (f : ∀ (x : α), β x) : Equiv f f :=
fun x => rfl
protected theorem Equiv.symm {f₁ f₂ : ∀ (x : α), β x} : Equiv f₁ f₂ → Equiv f₂ f₁ :=
fun h x => Eq.symm (h x)
protected theorem Equiv.trans {f₁ f₂ f₃ : ∀ (x : α), β x} : Equiv f₁ f₂ → Equiv f₂ f₃ → Equiv f₁ f₃ :=
fun h₁ h₂ x => Eq.trans (h₁ x) (h₂ x)
protected theorem Equiv.isEquivalence (α : Sort u) (β : α → Sort v) : Equivalence (@Function.Equiv α β) := {
refl := Equiv.refl,
symm := Equiv.symm,
trans := Equiv.trans
}
end Function
section
open Quotient
variables {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v}
@[instance]
private def funSetoid (α : Sort u) (β : α → Sort v) : Setoid (∀ (x : α), β x) :=
Setoid.mk (@Function.Equiv α β) (Function.Equiv.isEquivalence α β)
private def extfunApp (f : Quotient <| funSetoid α β) (x : α) : β x :=
Quot.liftOn f
(fun (f : ∀ (x : α), β x) => f x)
(fun f₁ f₂ h => h x)
theorem funext {f₁ f₂ : ∀ (x : α), β x} (h : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) : f₁ = f₂ := by
show extfunApp (Quotient.mk f₁) = extfunApp (Quotient.mk f₂)
apply congrArg
apply Quotient.sound
exact h
end
instance {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [∀ a, Subsingleton (β a)] : Subsingleton (∀ a, β a) :=
⟨fun f₁ f₂ => funext (fun a => Subsingleton.elim (f₁ a) (f₂ a))⟩
/- Squash -/
def Squash (α : Type u) := Quot (fun (a b : α) => True)
def Squash.mk {α : Type u} (x : α) : Squash α := Quot.mk _ x
theorem Squash.ind {α : Type u} {motive : Squash α → Prop} (h : ∀ (a : α), motive (Squash.mk a)) : ∀ (q : Squash α), motive q :=
Quot.ind h
@[inline] def Squash.lift {α β} [Subsingleton β] (s : Squash α) (f : α → β) : β :=
Quot.lift f (fun a b _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _) s
instance {α} : Subsingleton (Squash α) := ⟨fun a b =>
Squash.ind (motive := fun a => a = b)
(fun a => Squash.ind (motive := fun b => Squash.mk a = b)
(fun b => show Quot.mk _ a = Quot.mk _ b by apply Quot.sound; exact trivial)
b)
a⟩
namespace Lean
/- Kernel reduction hints -/
/--
When the kernel tries to reduce a term `Lean.reduceBool c`, it will invoke the Lean interpreter to evaluate `c`.
The kernel will not use the interpreter if `c` is not a constant.
This feature is useful for performing proofs by reflection.
Remark: the Lean frontend allows terms of the from `Lean.reduceBool t` where `t` is a term not containing
free variables. The frontend automatically declares a fresh auxiliary constant `c` and replaces the term with
`Lean.reduceBool c`. The main motivation is that the code for `t` will be pre-compiled.
Warning: by using this feature, the Lean compiler and interpreter become part of your trusted code base.
This is extra 30k lines of code. More importantly, you will probably not be able to check your developement using
external type checkers (e.g., Trepplein) that do not implement this feature.
Keep in mind that if you are using Lean as programming language, you are already trusting the Lean compiler and interpreter.
So, you are mainly losing the capability of type checking your developement using external checkers.
Recall that the compiler trusts the correctness of all `[implementedBy ...]` and `[extern ...]` annotations.
If an extern function is executed, then the trusted code base will also include the implementation of the associated
foreign function.
-/
constant reduceBool (b : Bool) : Bool := b
/--
Similar to `Lean.reduceBool` for closed `Nat` terms.
Remark: we do not have plans for supporting a generic `reduceValue {α} (a : α) : α := a`.
The main issue is that it is non-trivial to convert an arbitrary runtime object back into a Lean expression.
We believe `Lean.reduceBool` enables most interesting applications (e.g., proof by reflection). -/
constant reduceNat (n : Nat) : Nat := n
axiom ofReduceBool (a b : Bool) (h : reduceBool a = b) : a = b
axiom ofReduceNat (a b : Nat) (h : reduceNat a = b) : a = b
end Lean
|
d942db6d4bbe5efc2b9a19babf06ddf356ac0c2a | 947b78d97130d56365ae2ec264df196ce769371a | /src/Lean/Data/Lsp/Diagnostics.lean | 0e42e756966a1a57d16075357820120aba98b23c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shyamalschandra/lean4 | 27044812be8698f0c79147615b1d5090b9f4b037 | 6e7a883b21eaf62831e8111b251dc9b18f40e604 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,417,126,371 | 1,601,859,995,000 | 1,601,860,020,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,080 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Marc Huisinga. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Marc Huisinga, Wojciech Nawrocki
-/
import Lean.Data.Json
import Lean.Data.Lsp.Basic
import Lean.Data.Lsp.Utf16
import Lean.Message
/-! Definitions and functionality for emitting diagnostic information
such as errors, warnings and #command outputs from the LSP server. -/
namespace Lean
namespace Lsp
open Json
inductive DiagnosticSeverity
| error | warning | information | hint
instance DiagnosticSeverity.hasFromJson : HasFromJson DiagnosticSeverity :=
⟨fun j => match j.getNat? with
| some 1 => DiagnosticSeverity.error
| some 2 => DiagnosticSeverity.warning
| some 3 => DiagnosticSeverity.information
| some 4 => DiagnosticSeverity.hint
| _ => none⟩
instance DiagnosticSeverity.hasToJson : HasToJson DiagnosticSeverity :=
⟨fun o => match o with
| DiagnosticSeverity.error => (1 : Nat)
| DiagnosticSeverity.warning => (2 : Nat)
| DiagnosticSeverity.information => (3 : Nat)
| DiagnosticSeverity.hint => (4 : Nat)⟩
inductive DiagnosticCode
| int (i : Int)
| string (s : String)
instance DiagnosticCode.hasFromJson : HasFromJson DiagnosticCode :=
⟨fun j => match j with
| num (i : Int) => DiagnosticCode.int i
| str s => DiagnosticCode.string s
| _ => none⟩
instance DiagnosticCode.hasToJson : HasToJson DiagnosticCode :=
⟨fun o => match o with
| DiagnosticCode.int i => i
| DiagnosticCode.string s => s⟩
inductive DiagnosticTag
| unnecessary
| deprecated
instance DiagnosticTag.hasFromJson : HasFromJson DiagnosticTag :=
⟨fun j => match j.getNat? with
| some 1 => DiagnosticTag.unnecessary
| some 2 => DiagnosticTag.deprecated
| _ => none⟩
instance DiagnosticTag.hasToJson : HasToJson DiagnosticTag :=
⟨fun o => match o with
| DiagnosticTag.unnecessary => (1 : Nat)
| DiagnosticTag.deprecated => (2 : Nat)⟩
structure DiagnosticRelatedInformation :=
(location : Location)
(message : String)
instance DiagnosticRelatedInformation.hasFromJson : HasFromJson DiagnosticRelatedInformation :=
⟨fun j => do
location ← j.getObjValAs? Location "location";
message ← j.getObjValAs? String "message";
pure ⟨location, message⟩⟩
instance DiagnosticRelatedInformation.hasToJson : HasToJson DiagnosticRelatedInformation :=
⟨fun o => mkObj [
⟨"location", toJson o.location⟩,
⟨"message", o.message⟩]⟩
structure Diagnostic :=
(range : Range)
(severity? : Option DiagnosticSeverity := none)
(code? : Option DiagnosticCode := none)
(source? : Option String := none)
(message : String)
(tags? : Option (Array DiagnosticTag) := none)
(relatedInformation? : Option (Array DiagnosticRelatedInformation) := none)
instance Diagnostic.hasFromJson : HasFromJson Diagnostic :=
⟨fun j => do
range ← j.getObjValAs? Range "range";
let severity? := j.getObjValAs? DiagnosticSeverity "severity";
let code? := j.getObjValAs? DiagnosticCode "code";
let source? := j.getObjValAs? String "source";
message ← j.getObjValAs? String "message";
let tags? := j.getObjValAs? (Array DiagnosticTag) "tags";
let relatedInformation? := j.getObjValAs? (Array DiagnosticRelatedInformation) "relatedInformation";
pure ⟨range, severity?, code?, source?, message, tags?, relatedInformation?⟩⟩
instance Diagnostic.hasToJson : HasToJson Diagnostic :=
⟨fun o => mkObj $
opt "severity" o.severity? ++
opt "code" o.code? ++
opt "source" o.source? ++
opt "tags" o.tags? ++
opt "relatedInformation" o.relatedInformation? ++ [
⟨"range", toJson o.range⟩,
⟨"message", o.message⟩]⟩
structure PublishDiagnosticsParams :=
(uri : DocumentUri)
(version? : Option Int := none)
(diagnostics: Array Diagnostic)
instance PublishDiagnosticsParams.hasFromJson : HasFromJson PublishDiagnosticsParams :=
⟨fun j => do
uri ← j.getObjValAs? DocumentUri "uri";
let version? := j.getObjValAs? Int "version";
diagnostics ← j.getObjValAs? (Array Diagnostic) "diagnostics";
pure ⟨uri, version?, diagnostics⟩⟩
instance PublishDiagnosticsParams.hasToJson : HasToJson PublishDiagnosticsParams :=
⟨fun o => mkObj $
opt "version" o.version? ++ [
⟨"uri", toJson o.uri⟩,
⟨"diagnostics", toJson o.diagnostics⟩]⟩
/-- Transform a Lean Message concerning the given text into an LSP Diagnostic. -/
def msgToDiagnostic (text : FileMap) (m : Message) : IO Diagnostic := do
let low : Lsp.Position := text.leanPosToLspPos m.pos;
let high : Lsp.Position := match m.endPos with
| some endPos => text.leanPosToLspPos endPos
| none => low;
let range : Range := ⟨low, high⟩;
let severity := match m.severity with
| MessageSeverity.information => DiagnosticSeverity.information
| MessageSeverity.warning => DiagnosticSeverity.warning
| MessageSeverity.error => DiagnosticSeverity.error;
let source := "Lean 4 server";
message ← m.data.toString;
pure { range := range,
severity? := severity,
source? := source,
message := message,
}
end Lsp
end Lean
|
19f6678d3a607c3d485e5ba4ddca846f101652e2 | efa51dd2edbbbbd6c34bd0ce436415eb405832e7 | /20161026_ICTAC_Tutorial/ex27.lean | 01dcfaf46ad8c000259f1e68ad63b2deae544f9e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover/presentations | dd031a05bcb12c8855676c77e52ed84246bd889a | 3ce2d132d299409f1de269fa8e95afa1333d644e | refs/heads/master | 1,688,703,388,796 | 1,686,838,383,000 | 1,687,465,742,000 | 29,750,158 | 12 | 9 | Apache-2.0 | 1,540,211,670,000 | 1,422,042,683,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 219 | lean | variables A B : Type
variable a : A
variable b : B
check @id -- Π {A : Type u_1}, A → A
check @id A -- A → A
check @id B -- B → B
check @id A a -- A
check @id B b -- B
check id
check id a
|
fac6b60a532bd1132dd1094999fba4c9523686f5 | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/field_theory/mv_polynomial.lean | 9c4f6df95e4ce460dbbeb18e066bd50b1f386f89 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,389 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl
Multivariate functions of the form `α^n → α` are isomorphic to multivariate polynomials in
`n` variables.
-/
import linear_algebra.finsupp_vector_space field_theory.finite data.mv_polynomial
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
open lattice set linear_map submodule
namespace mv_polynomial
universes u v
variables {σ : Type u} {α : Type v}
instance [discrete_field α] : vector_space α (mv_polynomial σ α) :=
finsupp.vector_space _ _
section
variables (σ α) [discrete_field α] (m : ℕ)
def restrict_total_degree : submodule α (mv_polynomial σ α) :=
finsupp.supported _ _ {n | n.sum (λn e, e) ≤ m }
lemma mem_restrict_total_degree (p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
p ∈ restrict_total_degree σ α m ↔ p.total_degree ≤ m :=
begin
rw [total_degree, finset.sup_le_iff],
refl
end
end
section
variables (σ α)
def restrict_degree (m : ℕ) [discrete_field α] : submodule α (mv_polynomial σ α) :=
finsupp.supported _ _ {n | ∀i, n i ≤ m }
end
lemma mem_restrict_degree [discrete_field α] (p : mv_polynomial σ α) (n : ℕ) :
p ∈ restrict_degree σ α n ↔ (∀s ∈ p.support, ∀i, (s : σ →₀ ℕ) i ≤ n) :=
begin
rw [restrict_degree, finsupp.mem_supported],
refl
end
lemma mem_restrict_degree_iff_sup [discrete_field α] (p : mv_polynomial σ α) (n : ℕ) :
p ∈ restrict_degree σ α n ↔ ∀i, p.degrees.count i ≤ n :=
begin
simp only [mem_restrict_degree, degrees, multiset.count_sup, finsupp.count_to_multiset,
finset.sup_le_iff],
exact ⟨assume h n s hs, h s hs n, assume h s hs n, h n s hs⟩
end
lemma map_range_eq_map {β : Type*}
[comm_ring α] [comm_ring β] (p : mv_polynomial σ α)
(f : α → β) [is_semiring_hom f]:
finsupp.map_range f (is_semiring_hom.map_zero f) p = p.map f :=
begin
rw [← finsupp.sum_single p, finsupp.sum, finsupp.map_range_finset_sum,
← finset.sum_hom (map f)],
{ refine finset.sum_congr rfl (assume n _, _),
rw [finsupp.map_range_single, ← monomial, ← monomial, map_monomial] },
apply_instance
end
section
variables (σ α)
lemma is_basis_monomials [discrete_field α] :
is_basis α ((λs, (monomial s 1 : mv_polynomial σ α))) :=
suffices is_basis α (λ (sa : Σ _, unit), (monomial sa.1 1 : mv_polynomial σ α)),
begin
apply is_basis.comp this (λ (s : σ →₀ ℕ), ⟨s, punit.star⟩),
split,
{ intros x y hxy,
simpa using hxy },
{ intros x,
rcases x with ⟨x₁, x₂⟩,
use x₁,
rw punit_eq punit.star x₂ }
end,
begin
apply finsupp.is_basis_single (λ _ _, (1 : α)),
intro _,
apply is_basis_singleton_one,
end
end
end mv_polynomial
namespace mv_polynomial
universe u
variables (σ : Type u) (α : Type u) [discrete_field α]
open_locale classical
lemma dim_mv_polynomial : vector_space.dim α (mv_polynomial σ α) = cardinal.mk (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
by rw [← cardinal.lift_inj, ← (is_basis_monomials σ α).mk_eq_dim]
end mv_polynomial
namespace mv_polynomial
variables {α : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variables [discrete_field α] [fintype α] [fintype σ]
def indicator (a : σ → α) : mv_polynomial σ α :=
finset.univ.prod (λn, 1 - (X n - C (a n))^(fintype.card α - 1))
lemma eval_indicator_apply_eq_one (a : σ → α) :
eval a (indicator a) = 1 :=
have 0 < fintype.card α - 1,
begin
rw [← finite_field.card_units, fintype.card_pos_iff],
exact ⟨1⟩
end,
by simp only [indicator, (finset.prod_hom (eval a)).symm, eval_sub,
is_ring_hom.map_one (eval a), is_semiring_hom.map_pow (eval a), eval_X, eval_C,
sub_self, zero_pow this, sub_zero, finset.prod_const_one]
lemma eval_indicator_apply_eq_zero (a b : σ → α) (h : a ≠ b) :
eval a (indicator b) = 0 :=
have ∃i, a i ≠ b i, by rwa [(≠), function.funext_iff, not_forall] at h,
begin
rcases this with ⟨i, hi⟩,
simp only [indicator, (finset.prod_hom (eval a)).symm, eval_sub,
is_ring_hom.map_one (eval a), is_semiring_hom.map_pow (eval a), eval_X, eval_C,
sub_self, finset.prod_eq_zero_iff],
refine ⟨i, finset.mem_univ _, _⟩,
rw [finite_field.pow_card_sub_one_eq_one, sub_self],
rwa [(≠), sub_eq_zero],
end
lemma degrees_indicator (c : σ → α) :
degrees (indicator c) ≤ finset.univ.sum (λs:σ, add_monoid.smul (fintype.card α - 1) {s}) :=
begin
rw [indicator],
refine le_trans (degrees_prod _ _) (finset.sum_le_sum $ assume s hs, _),
refine le_trans (degrees_sub _ _) _,
rw [degrees_one, ← bot_eq_zero, bot_sup_eq],
refine le_trans (degrees_pow _ _) (add_monoid.smul_le_smul_of_le_right _ _),
refine le_trans (degrees_sub _ _) _,
rw [degrees_C, ← bot_eq_zero, sup_bot_eq],
exact degrees_X _
end
set_option class.instance_max_depth 50
lemma indicator_mem_restrict_degree (c : σ → α) :
indicator c ∈ restrict_degree σ α (fintype.card α - 1) :=
begin
rw [mem_restrict_degree_iff_sup, indicator],
assume n,
refine le_trans (multiset.count_le_of_le _ $ degrees_indicator _) (le_of_eq _),
rw [← finset.sum_hom (multiset.count n)],
simp only [is_add_monoid_hom.map_smul (multiset.count n), multiset.singleton_eq_singleton,
add_monoid.smul_eq_mul, nat.cast_id],
transitivity,
refine finset.sum_eq_single n _ _,
{ assume b hb ne, rw [multiset.count_cons_of_ne ne.symm, multiset.count_zero, mul_zero] },
{ assume h, exact (h $ finset.mem_univ _).elim },
{ rw [multiset.count_cons_self, multiset.count_zero, mul_one] }
end
section
variables (α σ)
def evalₗ : mv_polynomial σ α →ₗ[α] (σ → α) → α :=
⟨ λp e, p.eval e,
assume p q, funext $ assume e, eval_add,
assume a p, funext $ assume e, by rw [smul_eq_C_mul, eval_mul, eval_C]; refl ⟩
end
section
lemma evalₗ_apply (p : mv_polynomial σ α) (e : σ → α) : evalₗ α σ p e = p.eval e :=
rfl
end
lemma map_restrict_dom_evalₗ : (restrict_degree σ α (fintype.card α - 1)).map (evalₗ α σ) = ⊤ :=
begin
refine top_unique (submodule.le_def'.2 $ assume e _, mem_map.2 _),
refine ⟨finset.univ.sum (λn:σ → α, e n • indicator n), _, _⟩,
{ exact sum_mem _ (assume c _, smul_mem _ _ (indicator_mem_restrict_degree _)) },
{ ext n,
simp only [linear_map.map_sum, @pi.finset_sum_apply (σ → α) (λ_, α) _ _ _ _ _,
pi.smul_apply, linear_map.map_smul],
simp only [evalₗ_apply],
transitivity,
refine finset.sum_eq_single n _ _,
{ assume b _ h,
rw [eval_indicator_apply_eq_zero _ _ h.symm, smul_zero] },
{ assume h, exact (h $ finset.mem_univ n).elim },
{ rw [eval_indicator_apply_eq_one, smul_eq_mul, mul_one] } }
end
end mv_polynomial
namespace mv_polynomial
universe u
variables (σ : Type u) (α : Type u) [fintype σ] [discrete_field α] [fintype α]
@[derive [add_comm_group, vector_space α]]
def R : Type u := restrict_degree σ α (fintype.card α - 1)
noncomputable instance decidable_restrict_degree (m : ℕ) :
decidable_pred (λn, n ∈ {n : σ →₀ ℕ | ∀i, n i ≤ m }) :=
by simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq]; apply_instance
set_option class.instance_max_depth 60
lemma dim_R : vector_space.dim α (R σ α) = fintype.card (σ → α) :=
calc vector_space.dim α (R σ α) =
vector_space.dim α (↥{s : σ →₀ ℕ | ∀ (n : σ), s n ≤ fintype.card α - 1} →₀ α) :
linear_equiv.dim_eq
(finsupp.supported_equiv_finsupp {s : σ →₀ ℕ | ∀n:σ, s n ≤ fintype.card α - 1 })
... = cardinal.mk {s : σ →₀ ℕ | ∀ (n : σ), s n ≤ fintype.card α - 1} :
by rw [finsupp.dim_eq, dim_of_field, mul_one]
... = cardinal.mk {s : σ → ℕ | ∀ (n : σ), s n < fintype.card α } :
begin
refine quotient.sound ⟨equiv.subtype_congr finsupp.equiv_fun_on_fintype $ assume f, _⟩,
refine forall_congr (assume n, nat.le_sub_right_iff_add_le _),
exact fintype.card_pos_iff.2 ⟨0⟩
end
... = cardinal.mk (σ → {n // n < fintype.card α}) :
quotient.sound ⟨@equiv.subtype_pi_equiv_pi σ (λ_, ℕ) (λs n, n < fintype.card α)⟩
... = cardinal.mk (σ → fin (fintype.card α)) :
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.arrow_congr (equiv.refl σ) (equiv.fin_equiv_subtype _).symm⟩
... = cardinal.mk (σ → α) :
begin
refine (trunc.induction_on (fintype.equiv_fin α) $ assume (e : α ≃ fin (fintype.card α)), _),
refine quotient.sound ⟨equiv.arrow_congr (equiv.refl σ) e.symm⟩
end
... = fintype.card (σ → α) : cardinal.fintype_card _
def evalᵢ : R σ α →ₗ[α] (σ → α) → α :=
((evalₗ α σ).comp (restrict_degree σ α (fintype.card α - 1)).subtype)
lemma range_evalᵢ : (evalᵢ σ α).range = ⊤ :=
begin
rw [evalᵢ, linear_map.range_comp, range_subtype],
exact map_restrict_dom_evalₗ
end
lemma ker_evalₗ : (evalᵢ σ α).ker = ⊥ :=
begin
refine injective_of_surjective _ _ _ (range_evalᵢ _ _),
{ rw [dim_R], exact cardinal.nat_lt_omega _ },
{ rw [dim_R, dim_fun, dim_of_field, mul_one] }
end
lemma eq_zero_of_eval_eq_zero (p : mv_polynomial σ α)
(h : ∀v:σ → α, p.eval v = 0) (hp : p ∈ restrict_degree σ α (fintype.card α - 1)) :
p = 0 :=
let p' : R σ α := ⟨p, hp⟩ in
have p' ∈ (evalᵢ σ α).ker := by rw [mem_ker]; ext v; exact h v,
show p'.1 = (0 : R σ α).1,
begin
rw [ker_evalₗ, mem_bot] at this,
rw [this]
end
end mv_polynomial
|
b6eb3b1ea558db932af3192e8fe8d3fd6ab92a54 | 2a70b774d16dbdf5a533432ee0ebab6838df0948 | /_target/deps/mathlib/src/topology/sheaves/sheaf_condition/pairwise_intersections.lean | 3e0e6ce5611db1f426b129e17693b5883b1e9280 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hjvromen/lewis | 40b035973df7c77ebf927afab7878c76d05ff758 | 105b675f73630f028ad5d890897a51b3c1146fb0 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,944,636,343 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 327,553,599 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,851 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import topology.sheaves.sheaf
import category_theory.limits.preserves.basic
import category_theory.category.pairwise
/-!
# Equivalent formulations of the sheaf condition
We give an equivalent formulation of the sheaf condition.
Given any indexed type `ι`, we define `overlap ι`,
a category with objects corresponding to
* individual open sets, `single i`, and
* intersections of pairs of open sets, `pair i j`,
with morphisms from `pair i j` to both `single i` and `single j`.
Any open cover `U : ι → opens X` provides a functor `diagram U : overlap ι ⥤ (opens X)ᵒᵖ`.
There is a canonical cone over this functor, `cone U`, whose cone point is `supr U`,
and in fact this is a limit cone.
A presheaf `F : presheaf C X` is a sheaf precisely if it preserves this limit.
We express this in two equivalent ways, as
* `is_limit (F.map_cone (cone U))`, or
* `preserves_limit (diagram U) F`
-/
noncomputable theory
universes v u
open topological_space
open Top
open opposite
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
namespace Top.presheaf
variables {X : Top.{v}}
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
/--
An alternative formulation of the sheaf condition
(which we prove equivalent to the usual one below as
`sheaf_condition_equiv_sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections`).
A presheaf is a sheaf if `F` sends the cone `(pairwise.cocone U).op` to a limit cone.
(Recall `pairwise.cocone U`, has cone point `supr U`, mapping down to the `U i` and the `U i ⊓ U j`.)
-/
@[derive subsingleton, nolint has_inhabited_instance]
def sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections (F : presheaf C X) : Type (max u (v+1)) :=
Π ⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens X), is_limit (F.map_cone (pairwise.cocone U).op)
/--
An alternative formulation of the sheaf condition
(which we prove equivalent to the usual one below as
`sheaf_condition_equiv_sheaf_condition_preserves_limit_pairwise_intersections`).
A presheaf is a sheaf if `F` preserves the limit of `pairwise.diagram U`.
(Recall `pairwise.diagram U` is the diagram consisting of the pairwise intersections
`U i ⊓ U j` mapping into the open sets `U i`. This diagram has limit `supr U`.)
-/
@[derive subsingleton, nolint has_inhabited_instance]
def sheaf_condition_preserves_limit_pairwise_intersections
(F : presheaf C X) : Type (max u (v+1)) :=
Π ⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens X), preserves_limit (pairwise.diagram U).op F
/-!
The remainder of this file shows that these conditions are equivalent
to the usual sheaf condition.
-/
variables [has_products C]
namespace sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections
open category_theory.pairwise category_theory.pairwise.hom
open sheaf_condition_equalizer_products
/-- Implementation of `sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections.cone_equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def cone_equiv_functor_obj (F : presheaf C X)
⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens ↥X) (c : limits.cone ((diagram U).op ⋙ F)) :
limits.cone (sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.diagram F U) :=
{ X := c.X,
π :=
{ app := λ Z,
walking_parallel_pair.cases_on Z
(pi.lift (λ (i : ι), c.π.app (op (single i))))
(pi.lift (λ (b : ι × ι), c.π.app (op (pair b.1 b.2)))),
naturality' := λ Y Z f,
begin
cases Y; cases Z; cases f,
{ ext i, dsimp,
simp only [limit.lift_π, category.id_comp, fan.mk_π_app, category_theory.functor.map_id, category.assoc],
dsimp,
simp only [limit.lift_π, category.id_comp, fan.mk_π_app], },
{ ext ⟨i, j⟩, dsimp [sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.left_res],
simp only [limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, category.id_comp, fan.mk_π_app, category.assoc],
have h := c.π.naturality (has_hom.hom.op (hom.left i j)),
dsimp at h,
simpa using h, },
{ ext ⟨i, j⟩, dsimp [sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.right_res],
simp only [limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, category.id_comp, fan.mk_π_app, category.assoc],
have h := c.π.naturality (has_hom.hom.op (hom.right i j)),
dsimp at h,
simpa using h, },
{ ext i, dsimp,
simp only [limit.lift_π, category.id_comp, fan.mk_π_app, category_theory.functor.map_id, category.assoc],
dsimp,
simp only [limit.lift_π, category.id_comp, fan.mk_π_app], },
end, }, }
section
local attribute [tidy] tactic.case_bash
/-- Implementation of `sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections.cone_equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def cone_equiv_functor (F : presheaf C X)
⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens ↥X) :
limits.cone ((diagram U).op ⋙ F) ⥤ limits.cone (sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.diagram F U) :=
{ obj := λ c, cone_equiv_functor_obj F U c,
map := λ c c' f,
{ hom := f.hom, }, }.
end
/-- Implementation of `sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections.cone_equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def cone_equiv_inverse_obj (F : presheaf C X)
⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens ↥X)
(c : limits.cone (sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.diagram F U)) :
limits.cone ((diagram U).op ⋙ F) :=
{ X := c.X,
π :=
{ app :=
begin
intro x,
op_induction x,
rcases x with (⟨i⟩|⟨i,j⟩),
{ exact c.π.app (walking_parallel_pair.zero) ≫ pi.π _ i, },
{ exact c.π.app (walking_parallel_pair.one) ≫ pi.π _ (i, j), }
end,
naturality' :=
begin
-- Unfortunately `op_induction` isn't up to the task here, and we need to use `generalize`.
intros x y f,
have ex : x = op (unop x) := rfl,
have ey : y = op (unop y) := rfl,
revert ex ey,
generalize : unop x = x',
generalize : unop y = y',
rintro rfl rfl,
have ef : f = f.unop.op := rfl,
revert ef,
generalize : f.unop = f',
rintro rfl,
rcases x' with ⟨i⟩|⟨⟩; rcases y' with ⟨⟩|⟨j,j⟩; rcases f' with ⟨⟩,
{ dsimp, erw [F.map_id], simp, },
{ dsimp, simp only [category.id_comp, category.assoc],
have h := c.π.naturality (walking_parallel_pair_hom.left),
dsimp [sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.left_res] at h,
simp only [category.id_comp] at h,
have h' := h =≫ pi.π _ (i, j),
rw h',
simp,
refl, },
{ dsimp, simp only [category.id_comp, category.assoc],
have h := c.π.naturality (walking_parallel_pair_hom.right),
dsimp [sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.right_res] at h,
simp only [category.id_comp] at h,
have h' := h =≫ pi.π _ (j, i),
rw h',
simp,
refl, },
{ dsimp, erw [F.map_id], simp, },
end, }, }
/-- Implementation of `sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections.cone_equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def cone_equiv_inverse (F : presheaf C X)
⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens ↥X) :
limits.cone (sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.diagram F U) ⥤ limits.cone ((diagram U).op ⋙ F) :=
{ obj := λ c, cone_equiv_inverse_obj F U c,
map := λ c c' f,
{ hom := f.hom,
w' :=
begin
intro x,
op_induction x,
rcases x with (⟨i⟩|⟨i,j⟩),
{ dsimp,
rw [←(f.w walking_parallel_pair.zero), category.assoc], },
{ dsimp,
rw [←(f.w walking_parallel_pair.one), category.assoc], },
end }, }.
/-- Implementation of `sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections.cone_equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def cone_equiv_unit_iso_app (F : presheaf C X) ⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens ↥X)
(c : cone ((diagram U).op ⋙ F)) :
(𝟭 (cone ((diagram U).op ⋙ F))).obj c ≅
(cone_equiv_functor F U ⋙ cone_equiv_inverse F U).obj c :=
{ hom :=
{ hom := 𝟙 _,
w' := λ j, begin op_induction j, rcases j; tidy, end, },
inv :=
{ hom := 𝟙 _,
w' := λ j, begin op_induction j, rcases j; tidy, end }}
/-- Implementation of `sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections.cone_equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def cone_equiv_unit_iso (F : presheaf C X) ⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens X) :
𝟭 (limits.cone ((diagram U).op ⋙ F)) ≅
cone_equiv_functor F U ⋙ cone_equiv_inverse F U :=
nat_iso.of_components (cone_equiv_unit_iso_app F U) (by tidy)
/-- Implementation of `sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections.cone_equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def cone_equiv_counit_iso (F : presheaf C X) ⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens X) :
cone_equiv_inverse F U ⋙ cone_equiv_functor F U ≅
𝟭 (limits.cone (sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.diagram F U)) :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ c,
{ hom :=
{ hom := 𝟙 _,
w' :=
begin
rintro ⟨_|_⟩,
{ ext, dsimp, simp, },
{ ext ⟨i,j⟩, dsimp, simp, },
end },
inv :=
{ hom := 𝟙 _,
w' :=
begin
rintro ⟨_|_⟩,
{ ext, dsimp, simp, },
{ ext ⟨i,j⟩, dsimp, simp, },
end, }}) (by tidy)
/--
Cones over `diagram U ⋙ F` are the same as a cones over the usual sheaf condition equalizer diagram.
-/
@[simps]
def cone_equiv (F : presheaf C X) ⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens X) :
limits.cone ((diagram U).op ⋙ F) ≌ limits.cone (sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.diagram F U) :=
{ functor := cone_equiv_functor F U,
inverse := cone_equiv_inverse F U,
unit_iso := cone_equiv_unit_iso F U,
counit_iso := cone_equiv_counit_iso F U, }
local attribute [reducible]
sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.res
sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.left_res
/--
If `sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.fork` is an equalizer,
then `F.map_cone (cone U)` is a limit cone.
-/
def is_limit_map_cone_of_is_limit_sheaf_condition_fork
(F : presheaf C X) ⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens X)
(P : is_limit (sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.fork F U)) :
is_limit (F.map_cone (cocone U).op) :=
is_limit.of_iso_limit ((is_limit.of_cone_equiv (cone_equiv F U).symm).symm P)
{ hom :=
{ hom := 𝟙 _,
w' :=
begin
intro x,
op_induction x,
rcases x with ⟨⟩,
{ dsimp, simp, refl, },
{ dsimp,
simp only [limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, category.id_comp, fan.mk_π_app, category.assoc],
rw ←F.map_comp,
refl, }
end },
inv :=
{ hom := 𝟙 _,
w' :=
begin
intro x,
op_induction x,
rcases x with ⟨⟩,
{ dsimp, simp, refl, },
{ dsimp,
simp only [limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, category.id_comp, fan.mk_π_app, category.assoc],
rw ←F.map_comp,
refl, }
end }, }
/--
If `F.map_cone (cone U)` is a limit cone,
then `sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.fork` is an equalizer.
-/
def is_limit_sheaf_condition_fork_of_is_limit_map_cone
(F : presheaf C X) ⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens X)
(Q : is_limit (F.map_cone (cocone U).op)) :
is_limit (sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.fork F U) :=
is_limit.of_iso_limit ((is_limit.of_cone_equiv (cone_equiv F U)).symm Q)
{ hom :=
{ hom := 𝟙 _,
w' :=
begin
rintro ⟨⟩,
{ dsimp, simp, refl, },
{ dsimp, ext ⟨i, j⟩,
simp only [limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, category.id_comp, fan.mk_π_app, category.assoc],
rw ←F.map_comp,
refl, }
end },
inv :=
{ hom := 𝟙 _,
w' :=
begin
rintro ⟨⟩,
{ dsimp, simp, refl, },
{ dsimp, ext ⟨i, j⟩,
simp only [limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, category.id_comp, fan.mk_π_app, category.assoc],
rw ←F.map_comp,
refl, }
end }, }
end sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections
open sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections
/--
The sheaf condition in terms of an equalizer diagram is equivalent
to the reformulation in terms of a limit diagram over `U i` and `U i ⊓ U j`.
-/
def sheaf_condition_equiv_sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections (F : presheaf C X) :
F.sheaf_condition ≃ F.sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections :=
equiv.Pi_congr_right (λ i, equiv.Pi_congr_right (λ U,
equiv_of_subsingleton_of_subsingleton
(is_limit_map_cone_of_is_limit_sheaf_condition_fork F U)
(is_limit_sheaf_condition_fork_of_is_limit_map_cone F U)))
/--
The sheaf condition in terms of an equalizer diagram is equivalent
to the reformulation in terms of the presheaf preserving the limit of the diagram
consisting of the `U i` and `U i ⊓ U j`.
-/
def sheaf_condition_equiv_sheaf_condition_preserves_limit_pairwise_intersections
(F : presheaf C X) :
F.sheaf_condition ≃ F.sheaf_condition_preserves_limit_pairwise_intersections :=
equiv.trans
(sheaf_condition_equiv_sheaf_condition_pairwise_intersections F)
(equiv.Pi_congr_right (λ i, equiv.Pi_congr_right (λ U,
equiv_of_subsingleton_of_subsingleton
(λ P, preserves_limit_of_preserves_limit_cone (pairwise.cocone_is_colimit U).op P)
(by { introI, exact preserves_limit.preserves (pairwise.cocone_is_colimit U).op }))))
end Top.presheaf
|
1cdab74b2f9a091a699366925896bd2de056ba8e | 0c1546a496eccfb56620165cad015f88d56190c5 | /tests/lean/run/my_tac_class.lean | 1f230427200b3e945dc2457e56d4e963ef899926 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Solertis/lean | 491e0939957486f664498fbfb02546e042699958 | 84188c5aa1673fdf37a082b2de8562dddf53df3f | refs/heads/master | 1,610,174,257,606 | 1,486,263,620,000 | 1,486,263,620,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,632 | lean | meta def mytac :=
state_t nat tactic
meta instance : monad mytac :=
state_t.monad _ _
meta instance : monad.has_monad_lift tactic mytac :=
monad.monad_transformer_lift (state_t nat) tactic
meta instance (α : Type) : has_coe (tactic α) (mytac α) :=
⟨monad.monad_lift⟩
namespace mytac
meta def step {α : Type} (t : mytac α) : mytac unit :=
t >> return ()
meta def rstep {α : Type} (line : nat) (col : nat) (t : mytac α) : mytac unit :=
λ v s, tactic_result.cases_on (@scope_trace _ line col (t v s))
(λ ⟨a, v⟩ new_s, tactic_result.success ((), v) new_s)
(λ msg_thunk e new_s,
let msg := msg_thunk () ++ format.line ++ to_fmt "value: " ++ to_fmt v ++ format.line ++ to_fmt "state:" ++ format.line ++ new_s^.to_format in
(tactic.report_error line col msg >> tactic.failed) new_s)
meta def execute (tac : mytac unit) : tactic unit :=
tac 0 >> return ()
meta def save_info (line col : nat) : mytac unit :=
do v ← state_t.read,
s ← tactic.read,
tactic.save_info_thunk line col
(λ _, to_fmt "Custom state: " ++ to_fmt v ++ format.line ++
tactic_state.to_format s)
namespace interactive
meta def intros : mytac unit :=
tactic.intros >> return ()
meta def constructor : mytac unit :=
tactic.constructor
meta def trace (s : string) : mytac unit :=
tactic.trace s
meta def assumption : mytac unit :=
tactic.assumption
meta def inc : mytac unit :=
do v ← state_t.read, state_t.write (v+1)
end interactive
end mytac
example (p q : Prop) : p → q → p ∧ q :=
begin [mytac]
intros,
inc,
trace "test",
constructor,
inc,
assumption,
assumption
end
|
683878f0b18d1e4332d5f55c6f20a5e50913b10e | 9028d228ac200bbefe3a711342514dd4e4458bff | /src/topology/category/Compactum.lean | f3c248c0c9f5f054d1b0dd01ea6b14639c2695de | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mcncm/mathlib | 8d25099344d9d2bee62822cb9ed43aa3e09fa05e | fde3d78cadeec5ef827b16ae55664ef115e66f57 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,743,316,277 | 1,602,618,514,000 | 1,602,618,514,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,248 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz
-/
import category_theory.monad.types
import category_theory.monad.limits
import category_theory.equivalence
import topology.category.CompHaus
import data.set.constructions
/-!
# Compacta and Compact Hausdorff Spaces
Recall that, given a monad `M` on `Type*`, an *algebra* for `M` consists of the following data:
- A type `X : Type*`
- A "structure" map `M X → X`.
This data must also satisfy a distributivity and unit axiom, and algebras for `M` form a category
in an evident way.
See the file `category_theory.monad.algebra` for a general version, as well as the following link.
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/monad
This file proves the equivalence between the category of *compact Hausdorff topological spaces*
and the category of algebras for the *ultrafilter monad*.
## Notation:
Here are the main objects introduced in this file.
- `Compactum` is the type of compacta, which we define as algebras for the ultrafilter monad.
- `Compactum_to_CompHaus` is the functor `Compactum ⥤ CompHaus`. Here `CompHaus` is the usual
category of compact Hausdorff spaces.
- `Compactum_to_CompHaus.is_equivalence` is a term of type `is_equivalence Compactum_to_CompHaus`.
The proof of this equivalence is a bit technical. But the idea is quite simply that the structure
map `ultrafilter X → X` for an algebra `X` of the ultrafilter monad should be considered as the map
sending an ultrafilter to its limit in `X`. The topology on `X` is then defined by mimicking the
characterization of open sets in terms of ultrafilters.
Any `X : Compactum` is endowed with a coercion to `Type*`, as well as the following instances:
- `topological_space X`.
- `compact_space X`.
- `t2_space X`.
Any morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` of is endowed with a coercion to a function `X → Y`, which is shown to
be continuous in `continuous_of_hom`.
The function `Compactum.of_topological_space` can be used to construct a `Compactum` from a
topological space which satisfies `compact_space` and `t2_space`.
We also add wrappers around structures which already exist. Here are the main ones, all in the
`Compactum` namespace:
- `forget : Compactum ⥤ Type*` is the forgetful functor, which induces a `concrete_category`
instance for `Compactum`.
- `free : Type* ⥤ Compactum` is the left adjoint to `forget`, and the adjunction is in `adj`.
- `str : ultrafilter X → X` is the structure map for `X : Compactum`.
The notation `X.str` is preferred.
- `join : ultrafilter (ultrafilter X) → ultrafilter X` is the monadic join for `X : Compactum`.
Again, the notation `X.join` is preferred.
- `incl : X → ultrafilter X` is the unit for `X : Compactum`. The notation `X.incl` is preferred.
## References
- E. Manes, Algebraic Theories, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 26, Springer-Verlag, 1976.
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/ultrafilter
-/
open category_theory filter topological_space category_theory.limits has_finite_inter
open_locale classical
local notation `β` := of_type_functor ultrafilter
/-- The type `Compactum` of Compacta, defined as algebras for the ultrafilter monad. -/
@[derive [category, inhabited]]
def Compactum := monad.algebra β
namespace Compactum
/-- The forgetful functor to Type* -/
@[derive [creates_limits,faithful]]
def forget : Compactum ⥤ Type* := monad.forget _
/-- The "free" Compactum functor. -/
def free : Type* ⥤ Compactum := monad.free _
/-- The adjunction between `free` and `forget`. -/
def adj : free ⊣ forget := monad.adj _
-- Basic instances
instance : concrete_category Compactum := { forget := forget }
instance : has_coe_to_sort Compactum := ⟨Type*,forget.obj⟩
instance {X Y : Compactum} : has_coe_to_fun (X ⟶ Y) := ⟨λ f, X → Y, λ f, f.f⟩
instance : has_limits Compactum := has_limits_of_has_limits_creates_limits forget
/-- The structure map for a compactum, essentially sending an ultrafilter to its limit. -/
def str (X : Compactum) : ultrafilter X → X := X.a
/-- The monadic join. -/
def join (X : Compactum) : ultrafilter (ultrafilter X) → ultrafilter X := (μ_ β).app _
/-- The inclusion of `X` into `ultrafilter X`. -/
def incl (X : Compactum) : X → ultrafilter X := (η_ β).app _
@[simp] lemma str_incl (X : Compactum) (x : X) : X.str (X.incl x) = x :=
begin
change ((η_ β).app _ ≫ X.a) _ = _,
rw monad.algebra.unit,
refl,
end
@[simp] lemma str_hom_commute (X Y : Compactum) (f : X ⟶ Y) (xs : ultrafilter X) :
f (X.str xs) = Y.str (ultrafilter.map f xs) :=
begin
change (X.a ≫ f.f) _ = _,
rw ←f.h,
refl,
end
@[simp] lemma join_distrib (X : Compactum) (uux : ultrafilter (ultrafilter X)) :
X.str (X.join uux) = X.str (ultrafilter.map X.str uux) :=
begin
change ((μ_ β).app _ ≫ X.a) _ = _,
rw monad.algebra.assoc,
refl,
end
instance {X : Compactum} : topological_space X :=
{ is_open := { U | ∀ (F : ultrafilter X), X.str F ∈ U → U ∈ F.1 },
is_open_univ := λ _ _, filter.univ_sets _,
is_open_inter := λ S T h3 h4 h5 h6,
filter.inter_sets _ (h3 _ h6.1) (h4 _ h6.2),
is_open_sUnion := λ S h1 F ⟨T,hT,h2⟩,
filter.sets_of_superset _ (h1 T hT _ h2) (set.subset_sUnion_of_mem hT) }
theorem is_closed_iff {X : Compactum} (S : set X) : is_closed S ↔
(∀ F : ultrafilter X, S ∈ F.1 → X.str F ∈ S) :=
begin
split,
{ intros cond F h,
by_contradiction c,
specialize cond F c,
cases F with F hF,
rw ultrafilter_iff_compl_mem_iff_not_mem at hF,
rw hF at cond,
contradiction },
{ intros h1 F h2,
specialize h1 F,
cases mem_or_compl_mem_of_ultrafilter F.2 S;
finish }
end
instance {X : Compactum} : compact_space X :=
begin
constructor,
rw compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds,
intros F hF h,
refine ⟨X.str ⟨F,hF⟩, by tauto, _⟩,
rw le_nhds_iff,
intros S h1 h2,
exact h2 ⟨F,hF⟩ h1,
end
/-- A local definition used only in the proofs. -/
private def basic {X : Compactum} (A : set X) : set (ultrafilter X) := {F | A ∈ F.1}
/-- A local definition used only in the proofs. -/
private def cl {X : Compactum} (A : set X) : set X := X.str '' (basic A)
private lemma basic_inter {X : Compactum} (A B : set X) : basic (A ∩ B) = basic A ∩ basic B :=
begin
ext G,
split,
{ intro hG,
refine ⟨_, _⟩;
apply filter.sets_of_superset _ hG;
intros x hx;
finish },
{ rintros ⟨h1,h2⟩,
exact G.val.inter_sets h1 h2 }
end
private lemma subset_cl {X : Compactum} (A : set X) : A ⊆ cl A := λ a ha, ⟨X.incl a, ha,by simp⟩
private theorem cl_cl {X : Compactum} (A : set X) : cl (cl A) ⊆ cl A :=
begin
rintros _ ⟨F,hF,rfl⟩,
-- Notation to be used in this proof.
let fsu := finset (set (ultrafilter X)),
let ssu := set (set (ultrafilter X)),
let ι : fsu → ssu := coe,
let C0 : ssu := {Z | ∃ B ∈ F.1, X.str ⁻¹' B = Z},
let AA := {G : ultrafilter X | A ∈ G.1},
let C1 := insert AA C0,
let C2 := finite_inter_closure C1,
-- C0 is closed under intersections.
have claim1 : ∀ B C ∈ C0, B ∩ C ∈ C0,
{ rintros B C ⟨Q,hQ,rfl⟩ ⟨R,hR,rfl⟩,
use Q ∩ R,
simp only [and_true, eq_self_iff_true, set.preimage_inter, subtype.val_eq_coe],
exact inter_sets _ hQ hR },
-- All sets in C0 are nonempty.
have claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, set.nonempty B,
{ rintros B ⟨Q,hQ,rfl⟩,
obtain ⟨q⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_ultrafilter _ F.2 hQ,
use X.incl q,
simpa, },
-- The intersection of AA with every set in C0 is nonempty.
have claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, (AA ∩ B).nonempty,
{ rintros B ⟨Q,hQ,rfl⟩,
have : (Q ∩ cl A).nonempty,
{ apply nonempty_of_mem_ultrafilter _ F.2,
exact F.1.inter_sets hQ hF },
rcases this with ⟨q,hq1,P,hq2,hq3⟩,
refine ⟨P,hq2,_⟩,
rw ←hq3 at hq1,
simpa },
-- Suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subcollection of C1 is nonempty.
suffices : ∀ (T : fsu), ι T ⊆ C1 → (⋂₀ ι T).nonempty,
{ obtain ⟨G,h1,hG⟩ := exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this,
let GG : ultrafilter (ultrafilter X) := ⟨G, hG⟩,
use X.join GG,
have : ultrafilter.map X.str GG = F,
{ suffices : (ultrafilter.map X.str GG).1 ≤ F.1,
{ ext1,
exact is_ultrafilter.unique F.2 (ultrafilter.map X.str GG).2.1 this },
intros S hS,
refine h1 (or.inr ⟨S, by simpa⟩) },
rw [join_distrib, this],
exact ⟨h1 (or.inl rfl), rfl⟩ },
-- C2 is closed under finite intersections (by construction!).
have claim4 := finite_inter_closure_has_finite_inter C1,
-- C0 is closed under finite intersections by claim1.
have claim5 : has_finite_inter C0 := ⟨⟨set.univ, filter.univ_sets _, by simp⟩, claim1⟩,
-- Every element of C2 is nonempty.
have claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, (P : set (ultrafilter X)).nonempty,
{ suffices : ∀ P ∈ C2, P ∈ C0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ C0, P = AA ∩ Q,
{ intros P hP,
cases this P hP,
{ exact claim2 _ h },
{ rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩,
exact claim3 _ hQ } },
intros P hP,
exact claim5.finite_inter_closure_insert _ hP },
intros T hT,
-- Suffices to show that the intersection of the T's is contained in C2.
suffices : ⋂₀ ι T ∈ C2, by exact claim6 _ this,
-- Finish
apply claim4.finite_inter_mem,
intros t ht,
exact finite_inter_closure.basic (@hT t ht),
end
lemma is_closed_cl {X : Compactum} (A : set X) : is_closed (cl A) :=
begin
rw is_closed_iff,
intros F hF,
exact cl_cl _ ⟨F, hF, rfl⟩,
end
lemma str_eq_of_le_nhds {X : Compactum} (F : ultrafilter X) (x : X) :
F.1 ≤ nhds x → X.str F = x :=
begin
-- Notation to be used in this proof.
let fsu := finset (set (ultrafilter X)),
let ssu := set (set (ultrafilter X)),
let ι : fsu → ssu := coe,
let T0 : ssu := { S | ∃ A ∈ F.1, S = basic A },
let AA := (X.str ⁻¹' {x}),
let T1 := insert AA T0,
let T2 := finite_inter_closure T1,
intro cond,
-- If F contains a closed set A, then x is contained in A.
have claim1 : ∀ (A : set X), is_closed A → A ∈ F.1 → x ∈ A,
{ intros A hA h,
by_contradiction,
rw le_nhds_iff at cond,
specialize cond Aᶜ a hA,
rw ultrafilter_iff_compl_mem_iff_not_mem.mp F.2 at cond,
contradiction },
-- If A ∈ F, then x ∈ cl A.
have claim2 : ∀ (A : set X), A ∈ F.1 → x ∈ cl A,
{ intros A hA,
exact claim1 (cl A) (is_closed_cl A) (F.val.sets_of_superset hA (subset_cl A)) },
-- T0 is closed under intersections.
have claim3 : ∀ (S1 S2 ∈ T0), S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0,
{ rintros S1 S2 ⟨S1, hS1, rfl⟩ ⟨S2, hS2, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨S1 ∩ S2, F.1.inter_sets hS1 hS2, by simp [basic_inter]⟩ },
-- For every S ∈ T0, the intersection AA ∩ S is nonempty.
have claim4 : ∀ (S ∈ T0), (AA ∩ S).nonempty,
{ rintros S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩,
rcases claim2 _ hS with ⟨G, hG, hG2⟩,
exact ⟨G, hG2, hG⟩ },
-- Every element of T0 is nonempty.
have claim5 : ∀ (S ∈ T0), set.nonempty S,
{ rintros S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨F, hS⟩ },
-- Every element of T2 is nonempty.
have claim6 : ∀ (S ∈ T2), set.nonempty S,
{ suffices : ∀ S ∈ T2, S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q,
{ intros S hS,
cases this _ hS with h h,
{ exact claim5 S h },
{ rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩,
exact claim4 Q hQ } },
intros S hS,
apply finite_inter_closure_insert,
{ split,
{ use set.univ,
refine ⟨filter.univ_sets _, _⟩,
ext,
refine ⟨_, by tauto⟩,
{ intro,
apply filter.univ_sets, } },
{ exact claim3} },
{ exact hS} },
-- It suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subset of T1 is nonempty.
suffices : ∀ (F : fsu), ↑F ⊆ T1 → (⋂₀ ι F).nonempty,
{ obtain ⟨G,h1,hG⟩ := exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this,
let GG : ultrafilter (ultrafilter X) := ⟨G, hG⟩,
have c1 : X.join GG = F,
{ suffices : (X.join GG).1 ≤ F.1,
{ ext1,
exact is_ultrafilter.unique F.2 (join X GG).2.1 this},
intros P hP,
exact h1 (or.inr ⟨P, hP, rfl⟩) },
have c2 : ultrafilter.map X.str GG = X.incl x,
{ suffices : (ultrafilter.map X.str GG).1 ≤ (X.incl x).1,
{ ext1,
exact is_ultrafilter.unique (incl X x).2 (ultrafilter.map (str X) GG).2.1 this },
intros P hP,
apply filter.sets_of_superset _ (h1 (or.inl rfl)),
rintros x ⟨rfl⟩,
exact hP },
simp [←c1, c2] },
-- Finish...
intros T hT,
refine claim6 _ (finite_inter_mem (finite_inter_closure_has_finite_inter _) _ _),
intros t ht,
exact finite_inter_closure.basic (@hT t ht)
end
lemma le_nhds_of_str_eq {X : Compactum} (F : ultrafilter X) (x : X) :
X.str F = x → F.1 ≤ nhds x := λ h, le_nhds_iff.mpr (λ s hx hs, hs _ $ by rwa h)
-- All the hard work above boils down to this t2_space instance.
instance {X : Compactum} : t2_space X :=
begin
rw t2_iff_ultrafilter,
intros _ _ _ hF hx hy,
replace hx := str_eq_of_le_nhds ⟨_, hF⟩ _ hx,
replace hy := str_eq_of_le_nhds ⟨_, hF⟩ _ hy,
cc,
end
/-- The structure map of a compactum actually computes limits. -/
lemma Lim_eq_str {X : Compactum} (F : ultrafilter X) : F.Lim = X.str F :=
begin
erw [is_ultrafilter.Lim_eq_iff_le_nhds, le_nhds_iff],
tauto,
end
lemma cl_eq_closure {X : Compactum} (A : set X) : cl A = closure A :=
begin
ext,
rw mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter,
split,
{ rintro ⟨F, h1, h2⟩,
exact ⟨F, h1, le_nhds_of_str_eq _ _ h2⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨F, h1, h2⟩,
exact ⟨F, h1, str_eq_of_le_nhds _ _ h2⟩ }
end
/-- Any morphism of compacta is continuous. -/
lemma continuous_of_hom {X Y : Compactum} (f : X ⟶ Y) : continuous f :=
begin
rw continuous_iff_ultrafilter,
intros x _ h1 h2,
change (ultrafilter.map f ⟨_, h1⟩).1 ≤ _,
apply le_nhds_of_str_eq,
rw [← str_hom_commute, str_eq_of_le_nhds ⟨_, h1⟩ x h2],
end
/-- Given any compact Hausdorff space, we construct a Compactum. -/
noncomputable def of_topological_space (X : Type*) [topological_space X]
[compact_space X] [t2_space X] : Compactum :=
{ A := X,
a := ultrafilter.Lim,
unit' := by {ext x, exact Lim_eq (by finish [le_nhds_iff]) },
assoc' := begin
ext FF,
change ultrafilter (ultrafilter X) at FF,
set x := (ultrafilter.map ultrafilter.Lim FF).Lim with c1,
have c2 : ∀ (U : set X) (F : ultrafilter X), F.Lim ∈ U → is_open U → U ∈ F.1,
{ intros U F h1 hU,
exact c1 ▸ is_open_iff_ultrafilter.mp hU _ h1 _ F.2 (is_ultrafilter.le_nhds_Lim _) },
have c3 : (ultrafilter.map ultrafilter.Lim FF).1 ≤ nhds x,
{ rw le_nhds_iff,
intros U hx hU,
refine c2 _ _ (by rwa ← c1) hU },
have c4 : ∀ (U : set X), x ∈ U → is_open U → { G : ultrafilter X | U ∈ G.1 } ∈ FF.1,
{ intros U hx hU,
suffices : ultrafilter.Lim ⁻¹' U ∈ FF.1,
{ apply filter.sets_of_superset _ this,
intros P hP,
exact c2 U P hP hU},
exact @c3 U (mem_nhds_sets hU hx) },
apply Lim_eq,
rw le_nhds_iff,
exact c4,
end }
/-- Any continuous map between Compacta is a morphism of compacta. -/
def hom_of_continuous {X Y : Compactum} (f : X → Y) (cont : continuous f) : X ⟶ Y :=
{ f := f,
h' := begin
rw continuous_iff_ultrafilter at cont,
ext (F : ultrafilter X),
specialize cont (X.str F) F.1 F.2 (le_nhds_of_str_eq F (X.str F) rfl),
have := str_eq_of_le_nhds (ultrafilter.map f F) _ cont,
simpa only [←this, types_comp_apply, of_type_functor_map],
end }
end Compactum
/-- The functor functor from Compactum to CompHaus. -/
def Compactum_to_CompHaus : Compactum ⥤ CompHaus :=
{ obj := λ X, { to_Top := { α := X } },
map := λ X Y f,
{ to_fun := f,
continuous_to_fun := Compactum.continuous_of_hom _ }}
namespace Compactum_to_CompHaus
/-- The functor Compactum_to_CompHaus is full. -/
def full : full Compactum_to_CompHaus :=
{ preimage := λ X Y f, Compactum.hom_of_continuous f.1 f.2 }
/-- The functor Compactum_to_CompHaus is faithful. -/
lemma faithful : faithful Compactum_to_CompHaus := {}
/-- This definition is used to prove essential surjectivity of Compactum_to_CompHaus. -/
noncomputable def iso_of_topological_space {D : CompHaus} :
Compactum_to_CompHaus.obj (Compactum.of_topological_space D) ≅ D :=
{ hom :=
{ to_fun := id,
continuous_to_fun := λ _ h, by {rw is_open_iff_ultrafilter' at h, exact h} },
inv :=
{ to_fun := id,
continuous_to_fun := λ _ h1, by {rw is_open_iff_ultrafilter', intros _ h2, exact h1 _ h2} } }
/-- The functor Compactum_to_CompHaus is essentially surjective. -/
noncomputable def ess_surj : ess_surj Compactum_to_CompHaus :=
{ obj_preimage := λ X, Compactum.of_topological_space X,
iso' := λ _, iso_of_topological_space }
/-- The functor Compactum_to_CompHaus is an equivalence of categories. -/
noncomputable def is_equivalence : is_equivalence Compactum_to_CompHaus :=
begin
apply equivalence.equivalence_of_fully_faithfully_ess_surj _,
exact Compactum_to_CompHaus.full,
exact Compactum_to_CompHaus.faithful,
exact Compactum_to_CompHaus.ess_surj,
end
end Compactum_to_CompHaus
|
b0086eb07d72e5a12b32bc73fadff6af5abdad78 | 0c1546a496eccfb56620165cad015f88d56190c5 | /library/tools/super/resolution.lean | 6d8cdf7d6f528c0e2afede768a4b8947dcb6cba4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Solertis/lean | 491e0939957486f664498fbfb02546e042699958 | 84188c5aa1673fdf37a082b2de8562dddf53df3f | refs/heads/master | 1,610,174,257,606 | 1,486,263,620,000 | 1,486,263,620,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,294 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner
-/
import .clause .prover_state .utils
open tactic monad
namespace super
variable gt : expr → expr → bool
variables (ac1 ac2 : derived_clause)
variables (c1 c2 : clause)
variables (i1 i2 : nat)
-- c1 : ... → ¬a → ...
-- c2 : ... → a → ...
meta def try_resolve : tactic clause := do
qf1 ← c1^.open_metan c1^.num_quants,
qf2 ← c2^.open_metan c2^.num_quants,
-- FIXME: using default transparency unifies m*n with (x*y*z)*w here ???
unify_core transparency.reducible (qf1.1^.get_lit i1)^.formula (qf2.1^.get_lit i2)^.formula,
qf1i ← qf1.1^.inst_mvars,
guard $ clause.is_maximal gt qf1i i1,
op1 ← qf1.1^.open_constn i1,
op2 ← qf2.1^.open_constn c2^.num_lits,
a_in_op2 ← (op2.2^.nth i2)^.to_monad,
clause.meta_closure (qf1.2 ++ qf2.2) $
(op1.1^.inst (op2.1^.close_const a_in_op2)^.proof)^.close_constn (op1.2 ++ op2.2^.remove_nth i2)
meta def try_add_resolvent : prover unit := do
c' ← try_resolve gt ac1^.c ac2^.c i1 i2,
inf_score 1 [ac1^.sc, ac2^.sc] >>= mk_derived c' >>= add_inferred
meta def maybe_add_resolvent : prover unit :=
try_add_resolvent gt ac1 ac2 i1 i2 <|> return ()
meta def resolution_left_inf : inference :=
take given, do active ← get_active, sequence' $ do
given_i ← given^.selected,
guard $ clause.literal.is_neg (given^.c^.get_lit given_i),
other ← rb_map.values active,
guard $ ¬given^.sc^.in_sos ∨ ¬other^.sc^.in_sos,
other_i ← other^.selected,
guard $ clause.literal.is_pos (other^.c^.get_lit other_i),
[maybe_add_resolvent gt other given other_i given_i]
meta def resolution_right_inf : inference :=
take given, do active ← get_active, sequence' $ do
given_i ← given^.selected,
guard $ clause.literal.is_pos (given^.c^.get_lit given_i),
other ← rb_map.values active,
guard $ ¬given^.sc^.in_sos ∨ ¬other^.sc^.in_sos,
other_i ← other^.selected,
guard $ clause.literal.is_neg (other^.c^.get_lit other_i),
[maybe_add_resolvent gt given other given_i other_i]
@[super.inf]
meta def resolution_inf : inf_decl := inf_decl.mk 40 $
take given, do gt ← get_term_order, resolution_left_inf gt given >> resolution_right_inf gt given
end super
|
57dcfac18c48bb72fb8568afce08e3c4f14dbf47 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/algebra/add_torsor.lean | c840681c3923a8915af8511d356c6a829ef33d29 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,340 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.group.prod
import algebra.group.type_tags
import algebra.group.pi
import algebra.pointwise
import data.equiv.basic
import data.set.finite
/-!
# Torsors of additive group actions
This file defines torsors of additive group actions.
## Notations
The group elements are referred to as acting on points. This file
defines the notation `+ᵥ` for adding a group element to a point and
`-ᵥ` for subtracting two points to produce a group element.
## Implementation notes
Affine spaces are the motivating example of torsors of additive group actions. It may be appropriate
to refactor in terms of the general definition of group actions, via `to_additive`, when there is a
use for multiplicative torsors (currently mathlib only develops the theory of group actions for
multiplicative group actions).
## Notations
* `v +ᵥ p` is a notation for `has_vadd.vadd`, the left action of an additive monoid;
* `p₁ -ᵥ p₂` is a notation for `has_vsub.vsub`, difference between two points in an additive torsor
as an element of the corresponding additive group;
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
/-- Type class for the `-ᵥ` notation. -/
class has_vsub (G : out_param Type*) (P : Type*) :=
(vsub : P → P → G)
infix ` -ᵥ `:65 := has_vsub.vsub
/-- An `add_torsor G P` gives a structure to the nonempty type `P`,
acted on by an `add_group G` with a transitive and free action given
by the `+ᵥ` operation and a corresponding subtraction given by the
`-ᵥ` operation. In the case of a vector space, it is an affine
space. -/
class add_torsor (G : out_param Type*) (P : Type*) [out_param $ add_group G]
extends add_action G P, has_vsub G P :=
[nonempty : nonempty P]
(vsub_vadd' : ∀ (p1 p2 : P), (p1 -ᵥ p2 : G) +ᵥ p2 = p1)
(vadd_vsub' : ∀ (g : G) (p : P), g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g)
attribute [instance, priority 100, nolint dangerous_instance] add_torsor.nonempty
attribute [nolint dangerous_instance] add_torsor.to_has_vsub
/-- An `add_group G` is a torsor for itself. -/
@[nolint instance_priority]
instance add_group_is_add_torsor (G : Type*) [add_group G] :
add_torsor G G :=
{ vsub := has_sub.sub,
vsub_vadd' := sub_add_cancel,
vadd_vsub' := add_sub_cancel }
/-- Simplify subtraction for a torsor for an `add_group G` over
itself. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_eq_sub {G : Type*} [add_group G] (g1 g2 : G) : g1 -ᵥ g2 = g1 - g2 :=
rfl
section general
variables {G : Type*} {P : Type*} [add_group G] [T : add_torsor G P]
include T
/-- Adding the result of subtracting from another point produces that
point. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_vadd (p1 p2 : P) : p1 -ᵥ p2 +ᵥ p2 = p1 :=
add_torsor.vsub_vadd' p1 p2
/-- Adding a group element then subtracting the original point
produces that group element. -/
@[simp] lemma vadd_vsub (g : G) (p : P) : g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g :=
add_torsor.vadd_vsub' g p
/-- If the same point added to two group elements produces equal
results, those group elements are equal. -/
lemma vadd_right_cancel {g1 g2 : G} (p : P) (h : g1 +ᵥ p = g2 +ᵥ p) : g1 = g2 :=
by rw [←vadd_vsub g1, h, vadd_vsub]
@[simp] lemma vadd_right_cancel_iff {g1 g2 : G} (p : P) : g1 +ᵥ p = g2 +ᵥ p ↔ g1 = g2 :=
⟨vadd_right_cancel p, λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
/-- Adding a group element to the point `p` is an injective
function. -/
lemma vadd_right_injective (p : P) : function.injective ((+ᵥ p) : G → P) :=
λ g1 g2, vadd_right_cancel p
/-- Adding a group element to a point, then subtracting another point,
produces the same result as subtracting the points then adding the
group element. -/
lemma vadd_vsub_assoc (g : G) (p1 p2 : P) : g +ᵥ p1 -ᵥ p2 = g + (p1 -ᵥ p2) :=
begin
apply vadd_right_cancel p2,
rw [vsub_vadd, add_vadd, vsub_vadd]
end
/-- Subtracting a point from itself produces 0. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_self (p : P) : p -ᵥ p = (0 : G) :=
by rw [←zero_add (p -ᵥ p), ←vadd_vsub_assoc, vadd_vsub]
/-- If subtracting two points produces 0, they are equal. -/
lemma eq_of_vsub_eq_zero {p1 p2 : P} (h : p1 -ᵥ p2 = (0 : G)) : p1 = p2 :=
by rw [←vsub_vadd p1 p2, h, zero_vadd]
/-- Subtracting two points produces 0 if and only if they are
equal. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq {p1 p2 : P} : p1 -ᵥ p2 = (0 : G) ↔ p1 = p2 :=
iff.intro eq_of_vsub_eq_zero (λ h, h ▸ vsub_self _)
/-- Cancellation adding the results of two subtractions. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_add_vsub_cancel (p1 p2 p3 : P) : p1 -ᵥ p2 + (p2 -ᵥ p3) = (p1 -ᵥ p3) :=
begin
apply vadd_right_cancel p3,
rw [add_vadd, vsub_vadd, vsub_vadd, vsub_vadd]
end
/-- Subtracting two points in the reverse order produces the negation
of subtracting them. -/
@[simp] lemma neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev (p1 p2 : P) : -(p1 -ᵥ p2) = (p2 -ᵥ p1) :=
begin
refine neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero (vadd_right_cancel p1 _),
rw [vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self],
end
/-- Subtracting the result of adding a group element produces the same result
as subtracting the points and subtracting that group element. -/
lemma vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub (p1 p2 : P) (g : G) : p1 -ᵥ (g +ᵥ p2) = (p1 -ᵥ p2) - g :=
by rw [←add_right_inj (p2 -ᵥ p1 : G), vsub_add_vsub_cancel, ←neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, vadd_vsub,
←add_sub_assoc, ←neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_add_self, zero_sub]
/-- Cancellation subtracting the results of two subtractions. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right (p1 p2 p3 : P) :
(p1 -ᵥ p3) - (p2 -ᵥ p3) = (p1 -ᵥ p2) :=
by rw [←vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd]
/-- Convert between an equality with adding a group element to a point
and an equality of a subtraction of two points with a group
element. -/
lemma eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq (p1 : P) (g : G) (p2 : P) : p1 = g +ᵥ p2 ↔ p1 -ᵥ p2 = g :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ vadd_vsub _ _, λ h, h ▸ (vsub_vadd _ _).symm⟩
lemma vadd_eq_vadd_iff_neg_add_eq_vsub {v₁ v₂ : G} {p₁ p₂ : P} :
v₁ +ᵥ p₁ = v₂ +ᵥ p₂ ↔ - v₁ + v₂ = p₁ -ᵥ p₂ :=
by rw [eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq, vadd_vsub_assoc, ← add_right_inj (-v₁), neg_add_cancel_left, eq_comm]
namespace set
instance has_vsub : has_vsub (set G) (set P) := ⟨set.image2 (-ᵥ)⟩
section vsub
variables (s t : set P)
@[simp] lemma vsub_empty : s -ᵥ ∅ = ∅ := set.image2_empty_right
@[simp] lemma empty_vsub : ∅ -ᵥ s = ∅ := set.image2_empty_left
@[simp] lemma singleton_vsub (p : P) : {p} -ᵥ s = ((-ᵥ) p) '' s :=
image2_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma vsub_singleton (p : P) : s -ᵥ {p} = (-ᵥ p) '' s :=
image2_singleton_right
@[simp] lemma singleton_vsub_self (p : P) : ({p} : set P) -ᵥ {p} = {(0:G)} :=
by simp
variables {s t}
/-- `vsub` of a finite set is finite. -/
lemma finite.vsub (hs : finite s) (ht : finite t) : finite (s -ᵥ t) :=
hs.image2 _ ht
/-- Each pairwise difference is in the `vsub` set. -/
lemma vsub_mem_vsub {ps pt : P} (hs : ps ∈ s) (ht : pt ∈ t) :
(ps -ᵥ pt) ∈ s -ᵥ t :=
mem_image2_of_mem hs ht
/-- `s -ᵥ t` is monotone in both arguments. -/
@[mono] lemma vsub_subset_vsub {s' t' : set P} (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') :
s -ᵥ t ⊆ s' -ᵥ t' :=
image2_subset hs ht
lemma vsub_self_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : s -ᵥ s ⊆ t -ᵥ t := vsub_subset_vsub h h
lemma vsub_subset_iff {u : set G} : s -ᵥ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), x -ᵥ y ∈ u :=
image2_subset_iff
end vsub
instance add_action : add_action (set G) (set P) :=
{ vadd := set.image2 (+ᵥ),
zero_vadd := λ s, by simp [← singleton_zero],
add_vadd := λ s t p, by { apply image2_assoc, intros, apply add_vadd } }
variables {s s' : set G} {t t' : set P}
@[mono] lemma vadd_subset_vadd (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : s +ᵥ t ⊆ s' +ᵥ t' :=
image2_subset hs ht
@[simp] lemma vadd_singleton (s : set G) (p : P) : s +ᵥ {p} = (+ᵥ p) '' s := image2_singleton_right
@[simp] lemma singleton_vadd (v : G) (s : set P) : ({v} : set G) +ᵥ s = ((+ᵥ) v) '' s :=
image2_singleton_left
lemma finite.vadd (hs : finite s) (ht : finite t) : finite (s +ᵥ t) := hs.image2 _ ht
end set
@[simp] lemma vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right (v₁ v₂ : G) (p : P) :
(v₁ +ᵥ p) -ᵥ (v₂ +ᵥ p) = v₁ - v₂ :=
by rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self, add_zero]
/-- If the same point subtracted from two points produces equal
results, those points are equal. -/
lemma vsub_left_cancel {p1 p2 p : P} (h : p1 -ᵥ p = p2 -ᵥ p) : p1 = p2 :=
by rwa [←sub_eq_zero, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
/-- The same point subtracted from two points produces equal results
if and only if those points are equal. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_left_cancel_iff {p1 p2 p : P} : (p1 -ᵥ p) = p2 -ᵥ p ↔ p1 = p2 :=
⟨vsub_left_cancel, λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
/-- Subtracting the point `p` is an injective function. -/
lemma vsub_left_injective (p : P) : function.injective ((-ᵥ p) : P → G) :=
λ p2 p3, vsub_left_cancel
/-- If subtracting two points from the same point produces equal
results, those points are equal. -/
lemma vsub_right_cancel {p1 p2 p : P} (h : p -ᵥ p1 = p -ᵥ p2) : p1 = p2 :=
begin
refine vadd_left_cancel (p -ᵥ p2) _,
rw [vsub_vadd, ← h, vsub_vadd]
end
/-- Subtracting two points from the same point produces equal results
if and only if those points are equal. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_right_cancel_iff {p1 p2 p : P} : p -ᵥ p1 = p -ᵥ p2 ↔ p1 = p2 :=
⟨vsub_right_cancel, λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
/-- Subtracting a point from the point `p` is an injective
function. -/
lemma vsub_right_injective (p : P) : function.injective ((-ᵥ) p : P → G) :=
λ p2 p3, vsub_right_cancel
end general
section comm
variables {G : Type*} {P : Type*} [add_comm_group G] [add_torsor G P]
include G
/-- Cancellation subtracting the results of two subtractions. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left (p1 p2 p3 : P) :
(p3 -ᵥ p2) - (p3 -ᵥ p1) = (p1 -ᵥ p2) :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel]
@[simp] lemma vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left (v : G) (p1 p2 : P) :
(v +ᵥ p1) -ᵥ (v +ᵥ p2) = p1 -ᵥ p2 :=
by rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, add_sub_cancel']
lemma vsub_vadd_comm (p1 p2 p3 : P) : (p1 -ᵥ p2 : G) +ᵥ p3 = p3 -ᵥ p2 +ᵥ p1 :=
begin
rw [←@vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq G, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub],
simp
end
lemma vadd_eq_vadd_iff_sub_eq_vsub {v₁ v₂ : G} {p₁ p₂ : P} :
v₁ +ᵥ p₁ = v₂ +ᵥ p₂ ↔ v₂ - v₁ = p₁ -ᵥ p₂ :=
by rw [vadd_eq_vadd_iff_neg_add_eq_vsub, neg_add_eq_sub]
lemma vsub_sub_vsub_comm (p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P) :
(p₁ -ᵥ p₂) - (p₃ -ᵥ p₄) = (p₁ -ᵥ p₃) - (p₂ -ᵥ p₄) :=
by rw [← vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_comm, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub]
end comm
namespace prod
variables {G : Type*} {P : Type*} {G' : Type*} {P' : Type*} [add_group G] [add_group G']
[add_torsor G P] [add_torsor G' P']
instance : add_torsor (G × G') (P × P') :=
{ vadd := λ v p, (v.1 +ᵥ p.1, v.2 +ᵥ p.2),
zero_vadd := λ p, by simp,
add_vadd := by simp [add_vadd],
vsub := λ p₁ p₂, (p₁.1 -ᵥ p₂.1, p₁.2 -ᵥ p₂.2),
nonempty := prod.nonempty,
vsub_vadd' := λ p₁ p₂, show (p₁.1 -ᵥ p₂.1 +ᵥ p₂.1, _) = p₁, by simp,
vadd_vsub' := λ v p, show (v.1 +ᵥ p.1 -ᵥ p.1, v.2 +ᵥ p.2 -ᵥ p.2) =v, by simp }
@[simp] lemma fst_vadd (v : G × G') (p : P × P') : (v +ᵥ p).1 = v.1 +ᵥ p.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_vadd (v : G × G') (p : P × P') : (v +ᵥ p).2 = v.2 +ᵥ p.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_vadd_mk (v : G) (v' : G') (p : P) (p' : P') :
(v, v') +ᵥ (p, p') = (v +ᵥ p, v' +ᵥ p') := rfl
@[simp] lemma fst_vsub (p₁ p₂ : P × P') : (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : G × G').1 = p₁.1 -ᵥ p₂.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_vsub (p₁ p₂ : P × P') : (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : G × G').2 = p₁.2 -ᵥ p₂.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_vsub_mk (p₁ p₂ : P) (p₁' p₂' : P') :
((p₁, p₁') -ᵥ (p₂, p₂') : G × G') = (p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₁' -ᵥ p₂') := rfl
end prod
namespace pi
universes u v w
variables {I : Type u} {fg : I → Type v} [∀ i, add_group (fg i)] {fp : I → Type w}
open add_action add_torsor
/-- A product of `add_torsor`s is an `add_torsor`. -/
instance [T : ∀ i, add_torsor (fg i) (fp i)] : add_torsor (Π i, fg i) (Π i, fp i) :=
{ vadd := λ g p, λ i, g i +ᵥ p i,
zero_vadd := λ p, funext $ λ i, zero_vadd (fg i) (p i),
add_vadd := λ g₁ g₂ p, funext $ λ i, add_vadd (g₁ i) (g₂ i) (p i),
vsub := λ p₁ p₂, λ i, p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i,
nonempty := ⟨λ i, classical.choice (T i).nonempty⟩,
vsub_vadd' := λ p₁ p₂, funext $ λ i, vsub_vadd (p₁ i) (p₂ i),
vadd_vsub' := λ g p, funext $ λ i, vadd_vsub (g i) (p i) }
/-- Addition in a product of `add_torsor`s. -/
@[simp] lemma vadd_apply [T : ∀ i, add_torsor (fg i) (fp i)] (x : Π i, fg i) (y : Π i, fp i)
{i : I} : (x +ᵥ y) i = x i +ᵥ y i
:= rfl
end pi
namespace equiv
variables {G : Type*} {P : Type*} [add_group G] [add_torsor G P]
include G
/-- `v ↦ v +ᵥ p` as an equivalence. -/
def vadd_const (p : P) : G ≃ P :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v +ᵥ p,
inv_fun := λ p', p' -ᵥ p,
left_inv := λ v, vadd_vsub _ _,
right_inv := λ p', vsub_vadd _ _ }
@[simp] lemma coe_vadd_const (p : P) : ⇑(vadd_const p) = λ v, v+ᵥ p := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_vadd_const_symm (p : P) : ⇑(vadd_const p).symm = λ p', p' -ᵥ p := rfl
/-- `p' ↦ p -ᵥ p'` as an equivalence. -/
def const_vsub (p : P) : P ≃ G :=
{ to_fun := (-ᵥ) p,
inv_fun := λ v, -v +ᵥ p,
left_inv := λ p', by simp,
right_inv := λ v, by simp [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub] }
@[simp] lemma coe_const_vsub (p : P) : ⇑(const_vsub p) = (-ᵥ) p := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_const_vsub_symm (p : P) : ⇑(const_vsub p).symm = λ v, -v +ᵥ p := rfl
variables (P)
/-- The permutation given by `p ↦ v +ᵥ p`. -/
def const_vadd (v : G) : equiv.perm P :=
{ to_fun := (+ᵥ) v,
inv_fun := (+ᵥ) (-v),
left_inv := λ p, by simp [vadd_vadd],
right_inv := λ p, by simp [vadd_vadd] }
@[simp] lemma coe_const_vadd (v : G) : ⇑(const_vadd P v) = (+ᵥ) v := rfl
variable (G)
@[simp] lemma const_vadd_zero : const_vadd P (0:G) = 1 := ext $ zero_vadd G
variable {G}
@[simp] lemma const_vadd_add (v₁ v₂ : G) :
const_vadd P (v₁ + v₂) = const_vadd P v₁ * const_vadd P v₂ :=
ext $ add_vadd v₁ v₂
/-- `equiv.const_vadd` as a homomorphism from `multiplicative G` to `equiv.perm P` -/
def const_vadd_hom : multiplicative G →* equiv.perm P :=
{ to_fun := λ v, const_vadd P v.to_add,
map_one' := const_vadd_zero G P,
map_mul' := const_vadd_add P }
variable {P}
open function
/-- Point reflection in `x` as a permutation. -/
def point_reflection (x : P) : perm P := (const_vsub x).trans (vadd_const x)
lemma point_reflection_apply (x y : P) : point_reflection x y = x -ᵥ y +ᵥ x := rfl
@[simp] lemma point_reflection_symm (x : P) : (point_reflection x).symm = point_reflection x :=
ext $ by simp [point_reflection]
@[simp] lemma point_reflection_self (x : P) : point_reflection x x = x := vsub_vadd _ _
lemma point_reflection_involutive (x : P) : involutive (point_reflection x : P → P) :=
λ y, (equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply _).2 $ by rw point_reflection_symm
/-- `x` is the only fixed point of `point_reflection x`. This lemma requires
`x + x = y + y ↔ x = y`. There is no typeclass to use here, so we add it as an explicit argument. -/
lemma point_reflection_fixed_iff_of_injective_bit0 {x y : P} (h : injective (bit0 : G → G)) :
point_reflection x y = y ↔ y = x :=
by rw [point_reflection_apply, eq_comm, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev,
neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, ← bit0, ← bit0_zero, h.eq_iff, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq, eq_comm]
omit G
lemma injective_point_reflection_left_of_injective_bit0 {G P : Type*} [add_comm_group G]
[add_torsor G P] (h : injective (bit0 : G → G)) (y : P) :
injective (λ x : P, point_reflection x y) :=
λ x₁ x₂ (hy : point_reflection x₁ y = point_reflection x₂ y),
by rwa [point_reflection_apply, point_reflection_apply, vadd_eq_vadd_iff_sub_eq_vsub,
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, ← bit0, ← bit0_zero,
h.eq_iff, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hy
end equiv
|
c2f640a96f8c1291aaece872c033d63f4d903cb9 | ce4db867008cc96ee6ea6a34d39c2fa7c6ccb536 | /src/Supposons.lean | 0e5099226e70069385a5b230d1ed24e7c5932b31 | [] | no_license | PatrickMassot/lean-bavard | ab0ceedd6bab43dc0444903a80b911c5fbfb23c3 | 92a1a8c7ff322e4f575ec709b8c5348990d64f18 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,565,084,665 | 1,616,158,570,000 | 1,616,158,570,000 | 348,144,867 | 1 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,510 | lean | import tactic
import .tokens
import .commun
namespace tactic
setup_tactic_parser
@[derive has_reflect]
meta inductive Supposons_args
| regular : list pexpr → Supposons_args
| absurde : name → option pexpr → Supposons_args
meta def Supposons_parser : lean.parser Supposons_args :=
with_desc "... / Supposons par l'absurde ..." $
do { _ ← tk "par", _ ← tk "l'absurde",
n ← ident,
do { _ ← tk ":",
hyp ← texpr,
pure (Supposons_args.absurde n (some hyp)) } <|>
pure (Supposons_args.absurde n none)} <|>
Supposons_args.regular <$> ((tk "que")? *>parse_binders tac_rbp)
private meta def supposons_core (n : name) (ty : pexpr) :=
do verifie_nom n,
t ← target,
when (not $ t.is_pi) whnf_target,
t ← target,
when (not $ t.is_arrow) $
fail "Il n'y a rien à supposer ici, le but n'est pas une implication",
ty ← i_to_expr ty,
unify ty t.binding_domain,
intro_core n >> skip
open Supposons_args
/-- Introduit une hypothèse quand le but est une implication,
ou bien démarre un raisonnement par l'absurde. -/
@[interactive]
meta def Supposons : parse Supposons_parser → tactic unit
| (regular le) := do le.mmap' (λ b : pexpr,
supposons_core b.local_pp_name b.local_type)
| (absurde n hyp) := do
by_contradiction n,
try (interactive.push_neg (loc.ns [n])),
when hyp.is_some (do
Hyp ← hyp >>= to_expr,
let sp := simp_arg_type.symm_expr ``(exists_prop),
try (interactive.simp_core {} skip tt [sp] [] $ loc.ns [n]),
ehyp ← get_local n,
change_core Hyp (some ehyp))
end tactic
example : ∀ n > 0, true :=
begin
intro n,
success_if_fail { Supposons H : n < 0 },
success_if_fail { Supposons n : n > 0 },
Supposons H : n > 0,
trivial
end
example : ∀ n > 0, true :=
begin
intro n,
Supposons que H : n > 0,
trivial
end
example : ∀ n > 0, true :=
begin
success_if_fail { Supposons n },
intro n,
Supposons H : n > 0,
trivial
end
example (P Q : Prop) (h : ¬ Q → ¬ P) : P → Q :=
begin
Supposons hP,
Supposons par l'absurde hnQ,
exact h hnQ hP,
end
example (P Q : Prop) (h : ¬ Q → ¬ P) : P → Q :=
begin
Supposons hP,
Supposons par l'absurde hnQ : ¬ Q,
exact h hnQ hP,
end
example (P Q : Prop) (h : Q → ¬ P) : P → ¬ Q :=
begin
Supposons hP,
Supposons par l'absurde hnQ : Q,
exact h hnQ hP,
end |
e8b7c2d1c7963da7fedd7198786cd03f4571eb70 | f3a5af2927397cf346ec0e24312bfff077f00425 | /src/mynat/pow.lean | 045da93a38ecccce10bca2117f5dd35b9ba0f964 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ImperialCollegeLondon/natural_number_game | 05c39e1586408cfb563d1a12e1085a90726ab655 | f29b6c2884299fc63fdfc81ae5d7daaa3219f9fd | refs/heads/master | 1,688,570,964,990 | 1,636,908,242,000 | 1,636,908,242,000 | 195,403,790 | 277 | 84 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,547,955,000 | 1,562,328,792,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 380 | lean | import mynat.mul
namespace mynat
def pow : mynat → mynat → mynat
| m zero := one
| m (succ n) := pow m n * m
instance : has_pow mynat mynat := ⟨pow⟩
-- notation a ^ b := pow a b
example : (1 : mynat) ^ (1 : mynat) = 1 :=
begin
refl
end
lemma pow_zero (m : mynat) : m ^ (0 : mynat) = 1 := rfl
lemma pow_succ (m n : mynat) : m ^ (succ n) = m ^ n * m := rfl
end mynat |
8257869b85a298289ff23d19abbc1c2f5176cf3f | 77c5b91fae1b966ddd1db969ba37b6f0e4901e88 | /src/algebra/squarefree.lean | f7aa6904f762dacd92e196fcc4de8a100399f50f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dexmagic/mathlib | ff48eefc56e2412429b31d4fddd41a976eb287ce | 7a5d15a955a92a90e1d398b2281916b9c41270b2 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,481,322,046 | 1,633,360,193,000 | 1,633,360,193,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,747 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import ring_theory.unique_factorization_domain
import ring_theory.int.basic
import number_theory.divisors
/-!
# Squarefree elements of monoids
An element of a monoid is squarefree when it is not divisible by any squares
except the squares of units.
## Main Definitions
- `squarefree r` indicates that `r` is only divisible by `x * x` if `x` is a unit.
## Main Results
- `multiplicity.squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one`: `x` is `squarefree` iff for every `y`, either
`multiplicity y x ≤ 1` or `is_unit y`.
- `unique_factorization_monoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_factors`: A nonzero element `x` of a unique
factorization monoid is squarefree iff `factors x` has no duplicate factors.
- `nat.squarefree_iff_nodup_factors`: A positive natural number `x` is squarefree iff
the list `factors x` has no duplicate factors.
## Tags
squarefree, multiplicity
-/
variables {R : Type*}
/-- An element of a monoid is squarefree if the only squares that
divide it are the squares of units. -/
def squarefree [monoid R] (r : R) : Prop := ∀ x : R, x * x ∣ r → is_unit x
@[simp]
lemma is_unit.squarefree [comm_monoid R] {x : R} (h : is_unit x) :
squarefree x :=
λ y hdvd, is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left (is_unit_of_dvd_unit hdvd h)
@[simp]
lemma squarefree_one [comm_monoid R] : squarefree (1 : R) :=
is_unit_one.squarefree
@[simp]
lemma not_squarefree_zero [monoid_with_zero R] [nontrivial R] : ¬ squarefree (0 : R) :=
begin
erw [not_forall],
exact ⟨0, (by simp)⟩,
end
@[simp]
lemma irreducible.squarefree [comm_monoid R] {x : R} (h : irreducible x) :
squarefree x :=
begin
rintros y ⟨z, hz⟩,
rw mul_assoc at hz,
rcases h.is_unit_or_is_unit hz with hu | hu,
{ exact hu },
{ apply is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left hu },
end
@[simp]
lemma prime.squarefree [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero R] {x : R} (h : prime x) :
squarefree x :=
h.irreducible.squarefree
lemma squarefree_of_dvd_of_squarefree [comm_monoid R]
{x y : R} (hdvd : x ∣ y) (hsq : squarefree y) :
squarefree x :=
λ a h, hsq _ (h.trans hdvd)
namespace multiplicity
variables [comm_monoid R] [decidable_rel (has_dvd.dvd : R → R → Prop)]
lemma squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one (r : R) :
squarefree r ↔ ∀ x : R, multiplicity x r ≤ 1 ∨ is_unit x :=
begin
refine forall_congr (λ a, _),
rw [← sq, pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, or_iff_not_imp_left, not_le, imp_congr],
swap, { refl },
convert enat.add_one_le_iff_lt (enat.coe_ne_top 1),
norm_cast,
end
end multiplicity
namespace unique_factorization_monoid
variables [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero R] [nontrivial R] [unique_factorization_monoid R]
variables [normalization_monoid R]
lemma squarefree_iff_nodup_normalized_factors [decidable_eq R] {x : R} (x0 : x ≠ 0) :
squarefree x ↔ multiset.nodup (normalized_factors x) :=
begin
have drel : decidable_rel (has_dvd.dvd : R → R → Prop),
{ classical,
apply_instance, },
haveI := drel,
rw [multiplicity.squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one, multiset.nodup_iff_count_le_one],
split; intros h a,
{ by_cases hmem : a ∈ normalized_factors x,
{ have ha := irreducible_of_normalized_factor _ hmem,
rcases h a with h | h,
{ rw ← normalize_normalized_factor _ hmem,
rw [multiplicity_eq_count_normalized_factors ha x0] at h,
assumption_mod_cast },
{ have := ha.1, contradiction, } },
{ simp [multiset.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem hmem] } },
{ rw or_iff_not_imp_right, intro hu,
by_cases h0 : a = 0,
{ simp [h0, x0] },
rcases wf_dvd_monoid.exists_irreducible_factor hu h0 with ⟨b, hib, hdvd⟩,
apply le_trans (multiplicity.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_of_dvd_left hdvd),
rw [multiplicity_eq_count_normalized_factors hib x0],
specialize h (normalize b),
assumption_mod_cast }
end
lemma dvd_pow_iff_dvd_of_squarefree {x y : R} {n : ℕ} (hsq : squarefree x) (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
x ∣ y ^ n ↔ x ∣ y :=
begin
classical,
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ simp [hx, pow_eq_zero_iff (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)] },
by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ simp [hy, zero_pow (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)] },
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, h.pow h0⟩,
rw [dvd_iff_normalized_factors_le_normalized_factors hx (pow_ne_zero n hy),
normalized_factors_pow,
((squarefree_iff_nodup_normalized_factors hx).1 hsq).le_nsmul_iff_le h0] at h,
rwa dvd_iff_normalized_factors_le_normalized_factors hx hy,
end
end unique_factorization_monoid
namespace nat
lemma squarefree_iff_nodup_factors {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
squarefree n ↔ n.factors.nodup :=
begin
rw [unique_factorization_monoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_normalized_factors h0, nat.factors_eq],
simp,
end
instance : decidable_pred (squarefree : ℕ → Prop)
| 0 := is_false not_squarefree_zero
| (n + 1) := decidable_of_iff _ (squarefree_iff_nodup_factors (nat.succ_ne_zero n)).symm
open unique_factorization_monoid
lemma divisors_filter_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
(n.divisors.filter squarefree).val =
(unique_factorization_monoid.normalized_factors n).to_finset.powerset.val.map
(λ x, x.val.prod) :=
begin
rw multiset.nodup_ext (finset.nodup _) (multiset.nodup_map_on _ (finset.nodup _)),
{ intro a,
simp only [multiset.mem_filter, id.def, multiset.mem_map, finset.filter_val, ← finset.mem_def,
mem_divisors],
split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨an, h0⟩, hsq⟩,
use (unique_factorization_monoid.normalized_factors a).to_finset,
simp only [id.def, finset.mem_powerset],
rcases an with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
rw mul_ne_zero_iff at h0,
rw unique_factorization_monoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_normalized_factors h0.1 at hsq,
rw [multiset.to_finset_subset, multiset.to_finset_val, multiset.erase_dup_eq_self.2 hsq,
← associated_iff_eq, normalized_factors_mul h0.1 h0.2],
exact ⟨multiset.subset_of_le (multiset.le_add_right _ _), normalized_factors_prod h0.1⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩,
rw [finset.mem_powerset, ← finset.val_le_iff, multiset.to_finset_val] at hs,
have hs0 : s.val.prod ≠ 0,
{ rw [ne.def, multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff],
simp only [exists_prop, id.def, exists_eq_right],
intro con,
apply not_irreducible_zero (irreducible_of_normalized_factor 0
(multiset.mem_erase_dup.1 (multiset.mem_of_le hs con))) },
rw (normalized_factors_prod h0).symm.dvd_iff_dvd_right,
refine ⟨⟨multiset.prod_dvd_prod (le_trans hs (multiset.erase_dup_le _)), h0⟩, _⟩,
have h := unique_factorization_monoid.factors_unique irreducible_of_normalized_factor
(λ x hx, irreducible_of_normalized_factor x (multiset.mem_of_le
(le_trans hs (multiset.erase_dup_le _)) hx)) (normalized_factors_prod hs0),
rw [associated_eq_eq, multiset.rel_eq] at h,
rw [unique_factorization_monoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_normalized_factors hs0, h],
apply s.nodup } },
{ intros x hx y hy h,
rw [← finset.val_inj, ← multiset.rel_eq, ← associated_eq_eq],
rw [← finset.mem_def, finset.mem_powerset] at hx hy,
apply unique_factorization_monoid.factors_unique _ _ (associated_iff_eq.2 h),
{ intros z hz,
apply irreducible_of_normalized_factor z,
rw ← multiset.mem_to_finset,
apply hx hz },
{ intros z hz,
apply irreducible_of_normalized_factor z,
rw ← multiset.mem_to_finset,
apply hy hz } }
end
open_locale big_operators
lemma sum_divisors_filter_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0)
{α : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α] {f : ℕ → α} :
∑ i in (n.divisors.filter squarefree), f i =
∑ i in (unique_factorization_monoid.normalized_factors n).to_finset.powerset, f (i.val.prod) :=
by rw [finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum, divisors_filter_squarefree h0, multiset.map_map,
finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum]
lemma sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
∃ a b : ℕ, 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ b ^ 2 * a = n ∧ squarefree a :=
begin
let S := {s ∈ finset.range (n + 1) | s ∣ n ∧ ∃ x, s = x ^ 2},
have hSne : S.nonempty,
{ use 1,
have h1 : 0 < n ∧ ∃ (x : ℕ), 1 = x ^ 2 := ⟨hn, ⟨1, (one_pow 2).symm⟩⟩,
simpa [S] },
let s := finset.max' S hSne,
have hs : s ∈ S := finset.max'_mem S hSne,
simp only [finset.sep_def, S, finset.mem_filter, finset.mem_range] at hs,
obtain ⟨hsn1, ⟨a, hsa⟩, ⟨b, hsb⟩⟩ := hs,
rw hsa at hn,
obtain ⟨hlts, hlta⟩ := canonically_ordered_comm_semiring.mul_pos.mp hn,
rw hsb at hsa hn hlts,
refine ⟨a, b, hlta, (pow_pos_iff zero_lt_two).mp hlts, hsa.symm, _⟩,
rintro x ⟨y, hy⟩,
rw nat.is_unit_iff,
by_contra hx,
refine lt_le_antisymm _ (finset.le_max' S ((b * x) ^ 2) _),
{ simp_rw [S, hsa, finset.sep_def, finset.mem_filter, finset.mem_range],
refine ⟨lt_succ_iff.mpr (le_of_dvd hn _), _, ⟨b * x, rfl⟩⟩; use y; rw hy; ring },
{ convert lt_mul_of_one_lt_right hlts
(one_lt_pow 2 x zero_lt_two (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨λ h, by simp * at *, hx⟩)),
rw mul_pow },
end
lemma sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos' {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) :
∃ a b : ℕ, (b + 1) ^ 2 * (a + 1) = n ∧ squarefree (a + 1) :=
begin
obtain ⟨a₁, b₁, ha₁, hb₁, hab₁, hab₂⟩ := sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos h,
refine ⟨a₁.pred, b₁.pred, _, _⟩;
simpa only [add_one, succ_pred_eq_of_pos, ha₁, hb₁],
end
lemma sq_mul_squarefree (n : ℕ) : ∃ a b : ℕ, b ^ 2 * a = n ∧ squarefree a :=
begin
cases n,
{ exact ⟨1, 0, (by simp), squarefree_one⟩ },
{ obtain ⟨a, b, -, -, h₁, h₂⟩ := sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos (succ_pos n),
exact ⟨a, b, h₁, h₂⟩ },
end
end nat
|
c4b46dbae1601b636a184b534f85b9cca264fd31 | 05f637fa14ac28031cb1ea92086a0f4eb23ff2b1 | /src/builtin/optional.lean | aa7b685fc62c7ce5df7b147a8e7d4fc7d5cb4859 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean0.1 | 1ce92751d664aacff0529e139083304a7bbc8a71 | 0dc6fb974aa85ed6f305a2f4b10a53a44ee5f0ef | refs/heads/master | 1,610,830,535,062 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 19,588,851 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,978 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Author: Leonardo de Moura
import macros subtype
using subtype
-- We are encoding the (optional A) as a subset of A → Bool where
-- none is the predicate that is false everywhere
-- some(a) is the predicate that is true only at a
definition optional_pred (A : (Type U)) := (λ p : A → Bool, (∀ x, ¬ p x) ∨ exists_unique p)
definition optional (A : (Type U)) := subtype (A → Bool) (optional_pred A)
namespace optional
theorem some_pred {A : (Type U)} (a : A) : optional_pred A (λ x, x = a)
:= or_intror
(∀ x, ¬ x = a)
(exists_intro a
(and_intro (refl a) (take y, assume H : y ≠ a, H)))
theorem none_pred (A : (Type U)) : optional_pred A (λ x, false)
:= or_introl (take x, not_false_trivial) (exists_unique (λ x, false))
theorem inhab (A : (Type U)) : inhabited (optional A)
:= subtype_inhabited (exists_intro (λ x, false) (none_pred A))
definition none {A : (Type U)} : optional A
:= abst (λ x, false) (inhab A)
definition some {A : (Type U)} (a : A) : optional A
:= abst (λ x, x = a) (inhab A)
definition is_some {A : (Type U)} (n : optional A) := ∃ x : A, some x = n
theorem injectivity {A : (Type U)} {a a' : A} : some a = some a' → a = a'
:= assume Heq : some a = some a',
have eq_reps : (λ x, x = a) = (λ x, x = a'),
from abst_inj (inhab A) (some_pred a) (some_pred a') Heq,
show a = a',
from (congr1 eq_reps a) ◂ (refl a)
theorem distinct {A : (Type U)} (a : A) : some a ≠ none
:= not_intro (assume N : some a = none,
have eq_reps : (λ x, x = a) = (λ x, false),
from abst_inj (inhab A) (some_pred a) (none_pred A) N,
show false,
from (congr1 eq_reps a) ◂ (refl a))
definition value {A : (Type U)} (n : optional A) (H : is_some n) : A
:= ε (inhabited_ex_intro H) (λ x, some x = n)
theorem is_some_some {A : (Type U)} (a : A) : is_some (some a)
:= exists_intro a (refl (some a))
theorem not_is_some_none {A : (Type U)} : ¬ is_some (@none A)
:= not_intro (assume N : is_some (@none A),
obtain (w : A) (Hw : some w = @none A),
from N,
show false,
from absurd Hw (distinct w))
theorem value_some {A : (Type U)} (a : A) (H : is_some (some a)) : value (some a) H = a
:= have eq1 : some (value (some a) H) = some a,
from eps_ax (inhabited_ex_intro H) a (refl (some a)),
show value (some a) H = a,
from injectivity eq1
theorem false_pred {A : (Type U)} {p : A → Bool} (H : ∀ x, ¬ p x) : p = λ x, false
:= funext (λ x, eqf_intro (H x))
theorem singleton_pred {A : (Type U)} {p : A → Bool} {w : A} (H : p w ∧ ∀ y, y ≠ w → ¬ p y) : p = (λ x, x = w)
:= funext (take x, iff_intro
(assume Hpx : p x,
show x = w,
from by_contradiction (assume N : x ≠ w,
show false, from absurd Hpx (and_elimr H x N)))
(assume Heq : x = w,
show p x,
from subst (and_eliml H) (symm Heq)))
theorem dichotomy {A : (Type U)} (n : optional A) : n = none ∨ ∃ a, n = some a
:= have pred : optional_pred A (rep n),
from P_rep n,
show n = none ∨ ∃ a, n = some a,
from or_elim pred
(assume Hl : ∀ x : A, ¬ rep n x,
have rep_n_eq : rep n = λ x, false,
from false_pred Hl,
have rep_none_eq : rep none = λ x, false,
from rep_abst (inhab A) (λ x, false) (none_pred A),
show n = none ∨ ∃ a, n = some a,
from or_introl (rep_inj (trans rep_n_eq (symm rep_none_eq)))
(∃ a, n = some a))
(assume Hr : ∃ x, rep n x ∧ ∀ y, y ≠ x → ¬ rep n y,
obtain (w : A) (Hw : rep n w ∧ ∀ y, y ≠ w → ¬ rep n y),
from Hr,
have rep_n_eq : rep n = λ x, x = w,
from singleton_pred Hw,
have rep_some_eq : rep (some w) = λ x, x = w,
from rep_abst (inhab A) (λ x, x = w) (some_pred w),
have n_eq_some : n = some w,
from rep_inj (trans rep_n_eq (symm rep_some_eq)),
show n = none ∨ ∃ a, n = some a,
from or_intror (n = none)
(exists_intro w n_eq_some))
theorem induction {A : (Type U)} {P : optional A → Bool} (H1 : P none) (H2 : ∀ x, P (some x)) : ∀ n, P n
:= take n, or_elim (dichotomy n)
(assume Heq : n = none,
show P n,
from subst H1 (symm Heq))
(assume Hex : ∃ a, n = some a,
obtain (w : A) (Hw : n = some w),
from Hex,
show P n,
from subst (H2 w) (symm Hw))
set_opaque some true
set_opaque none true
set_opaque is_some true
set_opaque value true
end
set_opaque optional true
set_opaque optional_pred true
definition optional_inhabited := optional::inhab
add_rewrite optional::is_some_some optional::not_is_some_none optional::distinct optional::value_some
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.